>>36780020>Twilight deliberately discards her pony friendsFirst off, she leaves them behind with regret for reasons. Second off, nobody is discarded, since she goes back afterwords. If anything, she discards her human friends for her pony friends, but even that line of reasoning is severely flawed in ways I don't feel like getting into.
>for the sake of their human counterpartsGenerally "saving a world" is more important than hanging out with friends, yes. This is a problem, how?
>just to help them win a battle of the bands contestAnd save the world
>while teaching kids that friends are about as interchangeable as objectsBut she doesn't discard her pony friends, she just spends some time in a different place than them for a while.
>like last timeAlright, so last time Twilight didn't have a choice to leave her friends behind. At all, really. It wasn't twilight, it wasn't deliberately, she didn't discard them, her friends wouldn't have been ponies, she wouldn't have done it for the sake of their human counterparts since she didn't know they existed, she wouldn't have done it for the battle of the bands because one that wasn't involved and two she went into the situation completely blind. She wouldn't have taught anyone that friends were interchangable because she was in a real fucking hurry to get back home. Getting home to her REAL friends was her entire motivation in the first movie, more or less. Not a
single word of that sentence starting with "like last time" is even SLIGHTLY like fucking last time.
>And, whatever usefulness they could of otherwise had in that movie gets tossed aside as wellI can't really make heads or tails of this sentence, would you mind elaborating?
Actually, don't. I've heard enough. I don't think you understand human interaction very well. I've taken your bait. Happy?