[ home ] [ site / arch ] [ pony / oat / chat ] [ rp / fan ]

/fan/ - Fanworks

A hub for fan projects.
Name?

This field is optional. You can choose any name you want, or you can post anonymously by leaving this field empty.

Tripcodes are a way to identify yourself between posts without having to register with the site. To use a tripcode, enter your name as ‹name›#‹key›.You can choose anything you want as the key—it is private and will never be shown to other posters or stored on the server. For example:

Rarity#bestpony → Rarity!.4PK7yxdII

If you want a tripcode containing specific words, you can download a program designed to search for tripcodes, such as Tripcode Explorer.

Email?

Entering an e-mail is optional.

There are also code words you can enter here which perform certain actions when you submit your post.

  • sage — lets you post without bumping a thread.
  • nonoko — uses the original post behavior to redirect to the board index.

These can be used at the same time as an e-mail address by typing ‹email›#‹action›.

You can also use Skype names in place of an e-mail. The notation is the same as a link to a username on skype itself, which is skype:‹username›

Subject
Comment?
Giving emphasis
[b] Bold [/b] Ctrl + B
[i] Italic [/i] Ctrl + I
[u] Underlined [/u] Ctrl + U
[s] Strikethrough [/s] Ctrl + R
Hiding text
[?] Spoiler text [/?] Ctrl + S
[h] Hide block of text [/h] Ctrl + H
Special
[rcv] Royal Canterlot voice [/rcv] Ctrl + K
[shy] Fluttershy voice [/shy]
[cs] Comic Sans [/cs]
[tt] Monospaced [/tt]
[d20], [4d6] — Dice rolls
URLs and linking
Link to a post on the current board
>>1234
Link to another board
>>>/pony/
Link to a post on another board
>>>/pony/1234
Hypertext links
[url=https://www.ponychan.net/] Ponychan [/url]
File
Options
Password?

This field is for editing and deletions.


Pre-reader 63.546"s Equestria Daily Feedback Thread Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 23[Last 50 Posts]

#Reviewer

As everyone should know by now, Equestria Daily has gone almost exclusively to short bullet-point reviews, except in cases where only a small number of items need to be corrected for posting. I enjoy giving longer reviews, but can no longer do so through Equestria Daily, so I will post them here. I will only do so for stories that in my estimation would have passed the old automoon system; others will get only the bullet-point treatment in the email.

This thread is only for the authors in question and me. They are free to ask questions or ask me to remove their reviews from the thread for any reason. For any other traffic, I will ask a mod to delete it. General questions about Equestria Daily or the pre-reading process should be posted here:
>>128414

Note that I won't give an exhaustive list of errors; I'll provide a representative list of the types of problems I find and leave it to the author to scour his story for the rest.

To avoid repeating myself, I'll post a few of the more common discussion topics up here; your review may refer you to one or more of these.

Dash and hyphen use:
Hyphens are reserved for stuttering and hyphenated words. Please use a proper dash otherwise. They can be the em dash (Alt+0151) with no spaces around it or en dash (Alt+0150) surrounded by spaces. Some usage (primarily American) employs only the em dash, while other usage (primarily British) employs an em dash for cutoffs and an en dash for asides. It doesn't matter which system an author uses, as long as he is consistent.

Comma use with conjunctions:
There may be other grammatical reasons to place commas, but in the simplest forms, commas accompany conjunctions to separate clauses, not to separate two items of a compound subject, verb, or object. The most common simple sentence forms are:

He performed this action and that action.
He and she performed this action.
He and she performed this action and that action.
He performed this action, and she performed that action.

Dialogue punctuation/capitalization:
When transitioning from a quote into a speech tag, you use a comma in place of a period (other end punctuation would remain unchanged), and the tag is not capitalized by default. Here are the most common forms:

"Speech," he said.
"Speech." He performed a non-speaking action.
"Beginning of quoted sentence," he said, "end of quoted sentence."

Lavender Unicorn Syndrome (LUS):
This is overuse of descriptors such as "the lavender unicorn" when referring to a character. Most times, a name or pronoun will do, and they blend in without pulling attention away from what's happening in a story. These descriptors also tell us information we already know, for the most part. If anyone doesn't know that Twilight is a lavender unicorn, it'd be odd to find him this waist-deep in the fanfiction community.

When it's okay to use them are (very sparingly!) for a bit of flavor, when they actually do impart some new information, or when there are a lot of characters present, such that names quickly get repetitive and pronouns are ambiguous.

Talking heads:
This refers to conversations that have back-and-forth dialogue with little in the way of action to separate them. The characters may as well be disembodied heads floating in a featureless void, for all I know. Half of a conversation is nonverbal cues. They carry so much of the emotional content of what's said, so give the reader the complete picture. Use the same techniques as show versus tell. Speaking of which...

Show versus tell:
It's better to get the reader to interpret a character's emotions than to tell them outright. Devices for doing that include body language, reactions, facial expressions, actions, and sometimes speech and thought. The three biggest red flags are outright naming an emotion (sad), -ly adverb form (happily), and prepositional phrase form (in excitement). The last one in particular is almost always redundant with an action it follows. You'll bore the reader just throwing cold facts at him. This is akin to an actor expecting the audience to intuit his mood from his actions and speech rather than stating it outright. The latter is more efficient, but also quite boring. Showing is not always necessary, but is a better idea when emotions run high, the story is at a critical plot point, you want the reader to feel something along with the character, or it's early in the story where you need to hook the reader.

Saidisms:
The verb "said" (and to a degree, other common ones like "answered," "replied," "stated") blend in without calling much attention to themselves. It's okay to use other speaking verbs like "shouted," "muttered," "whispered," etc. to convey a mood or tone of voice, but after a point, the reader starts noticing the choice of speaking verb more than the speech itself, which is a bad thing. The more often an author uses more exotic ones, the more the reader will remember them more than the story. A good mix of mundane speaking verbs, more unusual ones, and going without a speech tag at all will serve a story well.

Head hopping:
It is okay to change character perspectives within a story, but doing so too abruptly or too often is jarring to the reader. An author must consider whether the information he's presenting would be available to the intended perspective character. If not, then he must consider whether the information is important enough to be necessary, can be presented in such a way that the perspective character can perceive it, or if a shift of perspective is truly the best way. And if a shift is justified, then be prepared to stay in that character's perspective for some time. Staying there for only a sentence or paragraph just jerks the reader around. And when changing perspectives, do so smoothly. Imagine a camera, gradually zooming out of one character to a more objective viewpoint, then zooming in on another.

Authors can find further information and other reviewing resources here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dqgYO7OqGDcE3CZ8V6WDOBKTITjzvbrHdyXOFtm_dfI/edit

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 24

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Cadet Leader Lemon Sweet exclaimed, clapping her hooves together excitedly//

We'll see if I have to end up giving you the full show-vs-tell speech, but here, the word "excitedly" is undoing the nice image you had going. The choice of speaking verb and the action of clapping her hooves already gives me a mental picture of excitement (the clapping could also be an attention-getting thing, I suppose—you could add in a facial expression to be clearer if you wanted), so bluntly telling me that's what it is just obviates it all, and turns it into a cold fact. You don't always have to show, but right here at the beginning is the place to grab the reader's interest, and getting him into the characters' mindsets and creating a vivid picture are essential here.

>lets give them a real send off//

let's, send-off

>The little crowd of local fillies burst into applause//

They just did that three sentences ago, and with much the same phrasing.

>one of them - a little periwinkle unicorn named Dinky Doo piped up//

First, use a proper dash instead of a hyphen. Either an em dash with no spaces around it (Alt+0151 = —) or an en dash with spaces around it (primarily British usage, Alt+0150 = –). Second, you don't complete the aside, as the rest of the sentence isn't detached like the description of Dinky. You should place another dash after her name. However, you could make do with commas instead, as the phrase is a legitimate appositive for "one of them."

>to which the three older fillies in question blushed and rubbed at the back of their heads//

Bad choice of preposition here. I think you meant "at." Let me rearrange the phrase to illustrate:
Yours: "The three older fillies in question blushed to this."
Mine: "The three older fillies in question blushed at this."

>Tag-a-long//

You call her "Tag Along" in the synopsis, and the official name of the cookie is "Tagalong." I can understand that you might take some liberties with that official name, but be consistent.

>It doesn’t seem like its been that long, does it?

Its/it's confusion.

>She’d been mimicking a certain posh pony’s accent for years in secret, and as she grew older and into her grown up voice//

Grown-up. Two things here. It's obviously tough to convey such an accent, and it would go a long way toward doing so if you made more careful word choice for her. That would also eliminate the need to have the narrator fill me in on this. It would stand on its own more with less explanation, and would also help establish different voices for your three characters.

>That brought on a wince at the memory.//

You've done this a couple of times now. Using demonstratives (this, that, these, those) on their own is weak, as they have vague antecedents that are often large chunks of narration. Try to find an appropriate noun to place after it, like: "That memory brought on a wince."

>Maple Syrup//

Why is "Syrup" capitalized? Unless it's someone's name, in which case the sentence takes on a whole new disturbing meaning.

>Do-si-do//

This matches the official cookie name, but you spelled it "Do-si-Do" in the synopsis. Again, be consistent.

>She stuck her tongue out and the three friends giggled in unison.//

Watch when and when not to use a comma with a conjunction. You usually don't when you simply have a compound structure of two subjects, verbs, or objects, but you do when you have two clauses, each with its own separate subject and verb, which is the case here.

>Although they had come close before - they had never quite gotten enough to outsell one of the teams from the bigger cities.//

Inappropriate dash use. This is just a dependent clause leading into a main clause. Use a comma.

>Manehatten//

They have now updated the canon map to the more realistic spelling of "Manehattan."

>and even freakin’ Appleloosa!//

You haven't established a narrative voice that should be doing this. It's been pretty objective and jumping around to each character, but here it takes on a very personal aspect. It's inconsistent, and it's unclear whose emotions this is supposed to express.

>Thin Mint flung a hoof across her eyes and made a dramatic sob.//

You just used "dramatically" a couple sentences ago (which was a telly use, by the way), so watch the word repetition.

>would-have-been record breaking//

As you've used it, this whole phrase should be hyphenated.

>Do-si-do had suspected foul play as rumor had it//

Minor point, but note that using no comma with an "as" clause tends to create the feel of "at the same time that," while including one tends to create a feel of "because."

>Diamond Tiara had been on that team, and had used her father’s chain of stores to sell the cookies//

See prior note about comma use with conjunctions. You don't need this one.

>rubbing at her horn a little in frustration//

Yeah, you'll get the show-versus-tell speech.

>Look I want that badge as much as you do//

Missing comma for the invective.

>Tag-a-long growled something unintelligible//

Odd narrative choice again. Since your narrator seems to know everyone's thoughts, why not this? It's only unintelligible to one or two of the characters, after all. Tagalong knows what she said.

>Dosi//

Same issue. Having the narrator use a nickname for her while not in a clear perspective and still taking on aspects of being omniscient is jarring.

>sales-drive//

This isn't a hyphenated term.

>Hold the bucking phone!//

Use of "bucking" in this way is incredibly cliched.

>That’s right girls!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>most importantly of those changes//

Used an adverb where you need an adjective.

>Which is an oddly apt thing to say I think//

Missing comma.

>but…You really think we can pull this off?//

There's no need to capitalize after an ellipsis if what follows makes syntactic sense as a continuous sentence.

>Tag-a-long let a slow grin flow across her face, her eyes sparkling intensely.//

See, here's a spot where you do a good job of showing. Give me the mental picture, and let her actions and appearance speak for themselves.

>Tag Along//

And another inconsistent spelling.

>yanno//

I've never seen this spelling. I think "y'know" would be clearer.

>Her voice trailed off//

It's redundant for the narration to tell me what the punctuation already does.

>Do-Si-Do//

Inconsistent again.

>‘nother//

Several things can confuse smart quotes. One is putting an apostrophe on the beginning of a word. This one is backward. If you add one after it, then delete the first, it will look right.

>larger than life//

Hyphenate.

>forever!

Italicize ! or ? when it's on a word in italics. You got this right earlier.

>Or Imprisoned, Exiled, Executed, Banished//

I don't get why all this is capitalized.

>em’//

Apostrophe on the wrong end.

>‘em//

Another backward apostrophe.

>the way Cookie Cadet’s do//

Misused apostrophe. This is a plural, not a possessive.

>Tag reminded her, carting in the next stack of boxes//

Participial phrases commonly make for misplace modifiers. If they start a clause, they're presumed to modify the subject; elsewhere, they're presumed to modify the nearest prior noun or pronoun object. Sometimes, they can modify other things, if the reader applies a little logic, but unless you keep this issue in mid, you will eventually run into misdirection or ambiguity. Here, I can't tell which one is carting in the next stack of boxes. By virtue of closeness in the sentence, it refers to "her" (Thin Mint), but I bet you meant it to be Tagalong.

>” That got a nod from Pinkie//

Extraneous space.

>Tag-a-long enthused//

That is in no way, shape, or form a speaking verb.

>she winked cheekily at Tag//

Exact action she just did two paragraphs ago.

>Tag Along burbled//

Seriously?

>Thin Mint said with understandable awe//

Understandable to whom? The narrator's not speaking in a particular character's voice.

>delicious smelling//

Hyphenate.

>“Okay.” Tag Along said with her nose buried in a thick scroll.//

Dialogue punctuation.

>“Laser Pointers?

Missing your closing quotation marks.

I'll say here that it's a bit annoying to read through 28 paragraphs of dialogue with only three actions interspersed. Talking heads is somewhat justified in this type of scene, but you carry it to an extreme.

>Of course, that didn’t mean they could stop trying to sell cookies - every box might count. Of course//

Repetitive, starting consecutive sentences with the same thing, where you're not playing it for some kind of effect.

>thin Mint//

Capitalization.

>Spike the Dragon//

Just "Spike" will do.

>And so it went//

Very awkward change of tone here. You'd been taking us through the scene with a combination of narration and dialogue, but here, you switch to summarizing everything through the narration. Not sure why you chose to do that, but it's odd and not particularly effective.

>Ditzy Do//

Spelling. And since Ditzy and Derpy are apparently different canon ponies, are you sure you don't want to go with Derpy?

>I swear half the town is trying to figure out if you’re trying//

Missing comma and repetitive wording.

>Tag felt some of the tension drain out of her. This was going to give her a massive tension headache//

More word repetition.

>“Ah, well… You know us. We’re not really party girls.” Do-si-do commented a little lamely//

Dialogue punctuation.

>They especially loved parties that involved dancing and doing things their parent’s would not necessarily approve of.//

Misused apostrophe.

>The slightly sexy sounding voice//

I have no idea where you're going with this…

>Sup//

’Sup

>in comical relief//

Please refrain from telling the reader how he is supposed to feel about something. If you have to say something is funny, chances are that it isn't.

>one of the biggest party night//

Number disagreement.

>The sleek black bodystocking’s she’d been expecting//

Misused apostrophe.

>44th //

Spell out numbers this short.

>“The Son of Dr. Negative”//

Book titles are underlined or (preferably) in italics.

>So instead of drowning in her own sorrows//

Actually, I wish you had given me a little about that. It'd add more realism, since that's certainly something that'd be on her mind, it'd make me more emotionally invested in the characters, and it would provide more impetus for why they're involved in this activity.

>masculine//

You're rather overusing this word here.

>penetrated the crate walls//

More word repetition.

>gimmie//

gimme

>Sun Raising ceremony//

You didn't capitalize this in the previous paragraph.

>Sugarcube corner//

Capitalization

>familiar looking unicorn browsing over several large and ancient looking//

More repetitive phrasing.

>Grabbing both of her friends by the collars of their ninja-bunny suits, she hauled them quickly down a side path//

Note that participles imply concurrent action, so you have her grabbing them at the same time she hauls them down the hallway. Surely these actions are in sequence, not at the same time.

>“Hah! Got it,” Tag grinned at her fellow fillies.//

How do you grin a sentence?

>Thin Mint - being the pegasi of the group//

Unless she's more than one pony, you need "pegasus."

>heavy looking water balloons//

They prepared this equipment together. More than thinking they looked heavy, she'd know whether they were heavy.

>with quite the comical effect//

Please let your comedy speak for itself.

>“Minty! Get the windows open! Dosi! We need the chow!”//

Given that she valued the anonymity their outfits were providing, why is she shouting out their names?

>and similar giggles were summoned up from her friends//

Odd phrasing and unnecessary passive voice.

>if they had been any of the guests foals//

Missing apostrophe.

>book cases//

bookcases

>giving it the impression of having a cheerful fire in it//

Set off the participle with a comma.

>Thin Mint ,and//

Spacing error.

>pegasi fashion//

Noun adjuncts are singular.

>At least they were still technically not adults, which meant the worst they’d get was some kind of punishment-fits-the-crime.//

Wouldn't that be the goal, regardless of age?

>“Hey girls,” a quiet and slightly amused voice startled her out of her thoughts, and sure enough, there was Twilight Sparkle sitting with a slightly amused smile on her face. //

Missing a speaking action, and repetitive phrasing.

>S’okay//

’S okay

>Tag muttered a little, and Pinkie perked up a little bit at the reassurance - not much, but a little.//

Repetitive.

>The Look//

I have no idea what this is. You've never defined it.

>Tag felt her hooves root to the floor for a brief moment, until she felt//

More repetition.

See the notes on comma use with conjunctions, dash and hyphen use, show versus tell, talking heads, and saidisms at the top of this thread. It may help to read the head hopping note, too, though that's not exactly the problem you have.

You have a very inconsistent narrative voice that can't decide whether it's omniscient or following one of the characters. Really, any arrangement can be made to work, but it has to achieve some purpose. I just felt jostled back and forth between being in an omniscient viewpoint, spending a little time with two of the characters, then settling in with the third the longer the story went on.

It's also a little curious how young and somewhat immature these girls sound, and how close an association they seem to have with the Cutie Mark Crusaders, given that you've made them just a year short of college age. There's a bit of a disconnect in how old they act and how old they actually are. Perhaps it would work better if you made them younger and either abandoned the "we're going to be splitting up soon" angle or came up with another reason for it. Conversely, you could mature them to make them act more age-appropriate.

In addition to the spots I marked, here are some other troubling word counts:

little - 34
look - 32
start/began - 20 I advise authors to avoid these, except where the beginning is noteworthy because it's abrupt or the action doesn't finish. Otherwise, it's obvious that any given action begins.
just - 39
"to be" verbs - I only looked for "is" and "was," and still got 133. You need to choose more active verbs.
as - 99 This suggests you're overusing "as" clauses.

As is another common problem, even for words that aren't used too much in the story as a whole, when you do use them, you tend to do so in clusters, which makes them stand out more.

This is a cute idea for a story, and I love the names you chose for these characters. But it's a little on the superficial side, especially considering the amount of time it spends in a subjective point of view. Though it seems odd to have the official name be Cookie Cadets when they do so much more than just the cookies.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you <i>have</i> to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadet Leader Lemon Sweet exclaimed, clapping her hooves together excitedly//</span><br />We&#039;ll see if I have to end up giving you the full show-vs-tell speech, but here, the word &quot;excitedly&quot; is undoing the nice image you had going. The choice of speaking verb and the action of clapping her hooves already gives me a mental picture of excitement (the clapping could also be an attention-getting thing, I suppose—you could add in a facial expression to be clearer if you wanted), so bluntly telling me that&#039;s what it is just obviates it all, and turns it into a cold fact. You don&#039;t always have to show, but right here at the beginning is the place to grab the reader&#039;s interest, and getting him into the characters&#039; mindsets and creating a vivid picture are essential here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lets give them a real send off//</span><br />let&#039;s, send-off<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The little crowd of local fillies burst into applause//</span><br />They just did that three sentences ago, and with much the same phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one of them - a little periwinkle unicorn named Dinky Doo piped up//</span><br />First, use a proper dash instead of a hyphen. Either an em dash with no spaces around it (Alt+0151 = —) or an en dash with spaces around it (primarily British usage, Alt+0150 = –). Second, you don&#039;t complete the aside, as the rest of the sentence isn&#039;t detached like the description of Dinky. You should place another dash after her name. However, you could make do with commas instead, as the phrase is a legitimate appositive for &quot;one of them.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to which the three older fillies in question blushed and rubbed at the back of their heads//</span><br />Bad choice of preposition here. I think you meant &quot;at.&quot; Let me rearrange the phrase to illustrate:<br />Yours: &quot;The three older fillies in question blushed to this.&quot;<br />Mine: &quot;The three older fillies in question blushed at this.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag-a-long//</span><br />You call her &quot;Tag Along&quot; in the synopsis, and the official name of the cookie is &quot;Tagalong.&quot; I can understand that you might take some liberties with that official name, but be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It doesn’t seem like its been that long, does it?</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She’d been mimicking a certain posh pony’s accent for years in secret, and as she grew older and into her grown up voice//</span><br />Grown-up. Two things here. It&#039;s obviously tough to convey such an accent, and it would go a long way toward doing so if you made more careful word choice for her. That would also eliminate the need to have the narrator fill me in on this. It would stand on its own more with less explanation, and would also help establish different voices for your three characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That brought on a wince at the memory.//</span><br />You&#039;ve done this a couple of times now. Using demonstratives (this, that, these, those) on their own is weak, as they have vague antecedents that are often large chunks of narration. Try to find an appropriate noun to place after it, like: &quot;That memory brought on a wince.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maple Syrup//</span><br />Why is &quot;Syrup&quot; capitalized? Unless it&#039;s someone&#039;s name, in which case the sentence takes on a whole new disturbing meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do-si-do//</span><br />This matches the official cookie name, but you spelled it &quot;Do-si-Do&quot; in the synopsis. Again, be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stuck her tongue out and the three friends giggled in unison.//</span><br />Watch when and when not to use a comma with a conjunction. You usually don&#039;t when you simply have a compound structure of two subjects, verbs, or objects, but you do when you have two clauses, each with its own separate subject and verb, which is the case here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Although they had come close before - they had never quite gotten enough to outsell one of the teams from the bigger cities.//</span><br />Inappropriate dash use. This is just a dependent clause leading into a main clause. Use a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Manehatten//</span><br />They have now updated the canon map to the more realistic spelling of &quot;Manehattan.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and even freakin’ Appleloosa!//</span><br />You haven&#039;t established a narrative voice that should be doing this. It&#039;s been pretty objective and jumping around to each character, but here it takes on a very personal aspect. It&#039;s inconsistent, and it&#039;s unclear whose emotions this is supposed to express.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thin Mint flung a hoof across her eyes and made a dramatic sob.//</span><br />You just used &quot;dramatically&quot; a couple sentences ago (which was a telly use, by the way), so watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;would-have-been record breaking//</span><br />As you&#039;ve used it, this whole phrase should be hyphenated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do-si-do had suspected foul play as rumor had it//</span><br />Minor point, but note that using no comma with an &quot;as&quot; clause tends to create the feel of &quot;at the same time that,&quot; while including one tends to create a feel of &quot;because.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond Tiara had been on that team, and had used her father’s chain of stores to sell the cookies//</span><br />See prior note about comma use with conjunctions. You don&#039;t need this one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rubbing at her horn a little in frustration//</span><br />Yeah, you&#039;ll get the show-versus-tell speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look I want that badge as much as you do//</span><br />Missing comma for the invective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag-a-long growled something unintelligible//</span><br />Odd narrative choice again. Since your narrator seems to know everyone&#039;s thoughts, why not this? It&#039;s only unintelligible to one or two of the characters, after all. Tagalong knows what she said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dosi//</span><br />Same issue. Having the narrator use a nickname for her while not in a clear perspective and still taking on aspects of being omniscient is jarring.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sales-drive//</span><br />This isn&#039;t a hyphenated term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hold the bucking phone!//</span><br />Use of &quot;bucking&quot; in this way is incredibly cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That’s right girls!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;most importantly of those changes//</span><br />Used an adverb where you need an adjective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Which is an oddly apt thing to say I think//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but…You really think we can pull this off?//</span><br />There&#039;s no need to capitalize after an ellipsis if what follows makes syntactic sense as a continuous sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag-a-long let a slow grin flow across her face, her eyes sparkling intensely.//</span><br />See, here&#039;s a spot where you do a good job of showing. Give me the mental picture, and let her actions and appearance speak for themselves.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag Along//</span><br />And another inconsistent spelling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yanno//</span><br />I&#039;ve never seen this spelling. I think &quot;y&#039;know&quot; would be clearer.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her voice trailed off//</span><br />It&#039;s redundant for the narration to tell me what the punctuation already does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do-Si-Do//</span><br />Inconsistent again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘nother//</span><br />Several things can confuse smart quotes. One is putting an apostrophe on the beginning of a word. This one is backward. If you add one after it, then delete the first, it will look right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;larger than life//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>forever</i>!</span><br />Italicize ! or ? when it&#039;s on a word in italics. You got this right earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Or Imprisoned, Exiled, Executed, Banished//</span><br />I don&#039;t get why all this is capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;em’//</span><br />Apostrophe on the wrong end.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Another backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the way Cookie Cadet’s do//</span><br />Misused apostrophe. This is a plural, not a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag reminded her, carting in the next stack of boxes//</span><br />Participial phrases commonly make for misplace modifiers. If they start a clause, they&#039;re presumed to modify the subject; elsewhere, they&#039;re presumed to modify the nearest prior noun or pronoun object. Sometimes, they can modify other things, if the reader applies a little logic, but unless you keep this issue in mid, you will eventually run into misdirection or ambiguity. Here, I can&#039;t tell which one is carting in the next stack of boxes. By virtue of closeness in the sentence, it refers to &quot;her&quot; (Thin Mint), but I bet you meant it to be Tagalong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;” That got a nod from Pinkie//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag-a-long enthused//</span><br />That is in no way, shape, or form a speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she winked cheekily at Tag//</span><br />Exact action she just did two paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag Along burbled//</span><br />Seriously?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thin Mint said with understandable awe//</span><br />Understandable to whom? The narrator&#039;s not speaking in a particular character&#039;s voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;delicious smelling//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Okay.” Tag Along said with her nose buried in a thick scroll.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Laser Pointers?</span><br />Missing your closing quotation marks.<br /><br />I&#039;ll say here that it&#039;s a bit annoying to read through 28 paragraphs of dialogue with only three actions interspersed. Talking heads is somewhat justified in this type of scene, but you carry it to an extreme.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Of course, that didn’t mean they could stop trying to sell cookies - every box might count. Of course//</span><br />Repetitive, starting consecutive sentences with the same thing, where you&#039;re not playing it for some kind of effect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thin Mint//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike the Dragon//</span><br />Just &quot;Spike&quot; will do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And so it went//</span><br />Very awkward change of tone here. You&#039;d been taking us through the scene with a combination of narration and dialogue, but here, you switch to summarizing everything through the narration. Not sure why you chose to do that, but it&#039;s odd and not particularly effective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ditzy Do//</span><br />Spelling. And since Ditzy and Derpy are apparently different canon ponies, are you sure you don&#039;t want to go with Derpy?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I swear half the town is trying to figure out if you’re trying//</span><br />Missing comma and repetitive wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag felt some of the tension drain out of her. This was going to give her a massive tension headache//</span><br />More word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Ah, well… You know us. We’re not really party girls.” Do-si-do commented a little lamely//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They especially loved parties that involved dancing and doing things their parent’s would not necessarily approve of.//</span><br />Misused apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The slightly sexy sounding voice//</span><br />I have no idea where you&#039;re going with this…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sup//</span><br />’Sup<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in comical relief//</span><br />Please refrain from telling the reader how he is supposed to feel about something. If you have to say something is funny, chances are that it isn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one of the biggest party night//</span><br />Number disagreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sleek black bodystocking’s she’d been expecting//</span><br />Misused apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;44th //</span><br />Spell out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“The Son of Dr. Negative”//</span><br />Book titles are underlined or (preferably) in italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So instead of drowning in her own sorrows//</span><br />Actually, I wish you <i>had</i> given me a little about that. It&#039;d add more realism, since that&#039;s certainly something that&#039;d be on her mind, it&#039;d make me more emotionally invested in the characters, and it would provide more impetus for why they&#039;re involved in this activity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;masculine//</span><br />You&#039;re rather overusing this word here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;penetrated the crate walls//</span><br />More word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gimmie//</span><br />gimme<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sun Raising ceremony//</span><br />You didn&#039;t capitalize this in the previous paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sugarcube corner//</span><br />Capitalization<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;familiar looking unicorn browsing over several large and ancient looking//</span><br />More repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Grabbing both of her friends by the collars of their ninja-bunny suits, she hauled them quickly down a side path//</span><br />Note that participles imply concurrent action, so you have her grabbing them at the same time she hauls them down the hallway. Surely these actions are in sequence, not at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Hah! Got it,” Tag grinned at her fellow fillies.//</span><br />How do you grin a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thin Mint - being the pegasi of the group//</span><br />Unless she&#039;s more than one pony, you need &quot;pegasus.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;heavy looking water balloons//</span><br />They prepared this equipment together. More than thinking they <i>looked</i> heavy, she&#039;d <i>know</i> whether they were heavy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with quite the comical effect//</span><br />Please let your comedy speak for itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Minty! Get the windows open! Dosi! We need the chow!”//</span><br />Given that she valued the anonymity their outfits were providing, why is she shouting out their names?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and similar giggles were summoned up from her friends//</span><br />Odd phrasing and unnecessary passive voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if they had been any of the guests foals//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;book cases//</span><br />bookcases<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;giving it the impression of having a cheerful fire in it//</span><br />Set off the participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thin Mint ,and//</span><br />Spacing error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pegasi fashion//</span><br />Noun adjuncts are singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At least they were still technically not adults, which meant the worst they’d get was some kind of punishment-fits-the-crime.//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t that be the goal, regardless of age?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Hey girls,” a quiet and slightly amused voice startled her out of her thoughts, and sure enough, there was Twilight Sparkle sitting with a slightly amused smile on her face. //</span><br />Missing a speaking action, and repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S’okay//</span><br />’S okay<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag muttered a little, and Pinkie perked up a little bit at the reassurance - not much, but a little.//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Look//</span><br />I have no idea what this is. You&#039;ve never defined it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tag felt her hooves root to the floor for a brief moment, until she felt//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br />See the notes on comma use with conjunctions, dash and hyphen use, show versus tell, talking heads, and saidisms at the top of this thread. It may help to read the head hopping note, too, though that&#039;s not exactly the problem you have.<br /><br />You have a very inconsistent narrative voice that can&#039;t decide whether it&#039;s omniscient or following one of the characters. Really, any arrangement can be made to work, but it has to achieve some purpose. I just felt jostled back and forth between being in an omniscient viewpoint, spending a little time with two of the characters, then settling in with the third the longer the story went on.<br /><br />It&#039;s also a little curious how young and somewhat immature these girls sound, and how close an association they seem to have with the Cutie Mark Crusaders, given that you&#039;ve made them just a year short of college age. There&#039;s a bit of a disconnect in how old they act and how old they actually are. Perhaps it would work better if you made them younger and either abandoned the &quot;we&#039;re going to be splitting up soon&quot; angle or came up with another reason for it. Conversely, you could mature them to make them act more age-appropriate.<br /><br />In addition to the spots I marked, here are some other troubling word counts:<br /><br />little - 34<br />look - 32<br />start/began - 20 I advise authors to avoid these, except where the beginning is noteworthy because it&#039;s abrupt or the action doesn&#039;t finish. Otherwise, it&#039;s obvious that any given action begins.<br />just - 39<br />&quot;to be&quot; verbs - I only looked for &quot;is&quot; and &quot;was,&quot; and still got 133. You need to choose more active verbs.<br />as - 99 This suggests you&#039;re overusing &quot;as&quot; clauses.<br /><br />As is another common problem, even for words that aren&#039;t used too much in the story as a whole, when you do use them, you tend to do so in clusters, which makes them stand out more.<br /><br />This is a cute idea for a story, and I love the names you chose for these characters. But it&#039;s a little on the superficial side, especially considering the amount of time it spends in a subjective point of view. Though it seems odd to have the official name be Cookie Cadets when they do so much more than just the cookies.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Oct 14th, 2013 12:28</span></div><br/>

vimbert!23hC9EoLsgCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 25

Well, 63, gotta say I'm a tad surprised; I figured you'd go for reviews outside of the system. Might it not be a good idea to provide the title of the fic in question you're giving the list for, if only to help the author find it?Well, 63, gotta say I&#039;m a tad surprised; I figured you&#039;d go for reviews outside of the system. Might it not be a good idea to provide the title of the fic in question you&#039;re giving the list for, if only to help the author find it?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 26

>>128889
No, I provide a link to the review in the email from EqD, so the author knows where to find it, and he's the only one who matters.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#128889" onclick="return highlight('128889', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|128889">&gt;&gt;128889</a><br />No, I provide a link to the review in the email from EqD, so the author knows where to find it, and he&#039;s the only one who matters.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 27

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The poor little filly gets so down every time I have to tell her no…//

Keep in mind your medium here. This is a speech affectation. There are times when an ellipsis makes sense in a letter, but only when the writer does so deliberately because it attaches some meaning. She wouldn't just trail off because she lost her train of thought. Letters don't work that way. Things like this are why letter stories are so much harder to write than everyone thinks they are, though you're doing better than most.

>Her school year just ended//

>between working my mail route and my new gig as a waitress at the Cumulus Club//
Again, this just screams exposition dump. Who would actually write like this? Sandy presumably knows her well enough to be aware of the mail route, so why would she spell it out like this? It takes great care to make these things be believable. She'd likely just refer to the mail route as work, and then you could work in an anecdote to show what her job is.

>dead end//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>I suppose that life is just one big aerial acrobatic, with each of us going through the motions. There are the ups and the downs, the twists and the turns, but never for a moment do I doubt that we're part of the same routine, and that you'll be there to catch me as I fall, as I will be for you.//

I'll be the first to say this is a subjective viewpoint, but the fact that she uses such flowery language here doesn't mesh at all with the harried mother just trying to find a moment of respite from her hyperactive daughter. It takes time to craft language like this, so when does she find a spare moment to do so? And if it's because she's leaving Scootaloo unsupervised while she does so, even the noise would grate on her. In short, she sounds way too composed for the image you're trying to create of her.

>I've had broken limbs and muscle cramps, but this is something out of a nightmare, Sandy.//

You're using an awful lot of direct address in these letters. It's obvious to whom she's writing. You don't need to keep saying so. Direct address should be held for occasional emphasis. This is yet another speech affectation that shouldn't carry over to letters.

>Sandy, I have cancer.//

Given that her complaints have been largely about her lifestyle and very little about physical discomfort, this just comes out of left field. It'd take time for that blood test to come back, and in the meantime, she never wrote Sandy about her concerns?

>The doctor even told me that if I make it to remission, there is a good chance that the cancer will come back//

Sounds like awful bedside manner to me. Being truthful is one thing, but bleak?

>I know that survival rates for my cancer are pretty high//

So what happened to the "even if you go into remission, the cancer will probably return"?

>I haven't been able to get a proper diagnosis from an oncologist//

She's starting a treatment program without a proper diagnosis?

I can't tell you not to put links in your story, but it's generally a bad idea to encourage people to click away from your story.

>my first of many surgeries//

You really are rushing through this. It's unusual to go to surgery until after a course of chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment. You made an oblique reference to such, but not in a way that she was going through it herself, or how it made her feel. Surely that would have been noteworthy enough to write about.

>mine and my daughter's future//

my

>I can't even think straight. My hooves are shaking, despite the medicine they gave me to calm me before anesthesia.//

Again, this is awfully technical for a letter, and so formal as to undercut any sense of fear that the text is trying to assure me is there. She can't think straight, and yet she can wax poetic and say things like "as if I were floating in some surreal dream world where the universe and karma take turns playing cruel jokes on me." I don't buy it.

>It's so cold in this hospital//

It's also unhealthy for her to be so. The staff don't want her to be cold. They'd adjust the thermostat, bring in extra blankets, something.

>placing some port beneath my skin//

Now this makes sense. But why hasn't she mentioned it until now? This is the third time she's brought up surgery, and it wouldn't have been a surprise.

>self esteem//

Hyphenate.

>it doesn't take more than an hour or so for them to walk or fly right out the door they came in//

So why did Dash have to stay in the hospital?

>We are, all of us, bound to magic. As much as I'm sure you're pained to admit it, we ponies are as magical as the dragons themselves. Furthermore, each pony has a unique magic to themselves. These mana conduits, as the doctor calls them, run through our bodies like invisible blood vessels, holding our spirits to our bodies. And when another pony's mana conduits cross our own, via something like using magic to stitch a broken bone… Well, the consequences are as terrifying as you'll likely believe.//

Headcanon infodump is a bad thing when trying to keep up an emotional moment. This is all pretty irrelevant.

>which in this unfortunate case, means the leukemia would grow out of control and kill me within minutes//

That depends, doesn't it? Presumably the doctors can control what grows and what doesn't. Forcing skin cells to reproduce so that they cover a wound without making the blood cells within the skin's capillaries also reproduce, for instance. So why couldn't a doctor enhance the body's immune response, which is generally overpowered by serious cancer, while simultaneously not enhancing the growth of the cancer itself?

>And I'm almost certain my mane is falling out.//

Seems like the kind of thing she'd know pretty definitively.

>The nurses took Scootaloo, Sandy. My baby girl isn't here. She was crying too much, so they took her away, and now I'm crying too.//

Where did they take her, and why would they prevent her from visiting at all? This falls under the heading of "piling on." You don't need to add tragedy for the sake of tragedy. The least amount of tragedy needed to make the story work is generally the best.

>shorn//

Well, no, they fell out.

>run by a delightful young mare who runs//

Watch the word repetition.

>custom made//

Hyphenate.

>I must apologize for the… urgency, I suppose… in my last letter.//

Again, this is something you'd do with speech, not with writing.

>one to many ciders//

to/too confusion

>long term//

>short term//
Hyphenate.

>It's been two weeks to the day that I was first diagnosed with leukemia//

She's gone bald in less than two weeks? That would be very unusual.

>I don't know why, it's something I ought to be used to by now.//

Comma splice. You've tacked together two complete sentences.

>being their for your loved ones//

there/their confusion

Your mechanics were quite good, so I don't have too many complaints there. As such, I was able to go into more depth with my in-line comments and don't really need to say much more here. My main issues are that the letters are often inconsistent in tone with Firefly's state of mind, and that there are a number of things that are incompatible with a letter-format story (a common error in this type of story).

Watch your "to be" verbs, though. I only searched for the two simplest ones—is and was—and still found 120. It makes your story much more interesting to choose more active verbs. Using "to be" verbs is pretty inevitable, but I bet you could cut that down significantly.

Now, to the tumblr you link. Is that your tumblr? If not, have you gotten permission from the owner to use his story? It's also odd that you rely on the tumblr itself to tell a bit of the story, namely that Sandy was there when Firefly died. And as far in debt as Firefly was, it really rang hollow that Sandy couldn't somehow raise train fare for what is a really short trip (remember, in "The Best Night Ever," a coach trip at a walking pace from Canterlot to Ponyville took just a few hours). I was certain you'd somehow play it that Sandy was intentionally avoiding Firefly.

Next, emotions work best in contrast. You start off with a miserable mother, and everything just goes down from there. You have but a few one-sentence light moments anywhere in the story. Sad is sad when it's compared to happy. It'd serve your story much better if you worked in some upbeat moments.

Lastly, it's a bit weak on the conflict. Like I said, I thought you were building toward some confrontation between Sandy and Firefly. As it is, we just have this omnipresent tragedy, but we don't really see anything change as a result of it. There's no resolution of interpersonal conflict, no moment of character growth. A story can survive without such, but rare is the story that can do it well. You're relying on the sadness only, and that's a very tricky balancing act to achieve.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The poor little filly gets so down every time I have to tell her no…//</span><br />Keep in mind your medium here. This is a speech affectation. There are times when an ellipsis makes sense in a letter, but only when the writer does so deliberately because it attaches some meaning. She wouldn&#039;t just trail off because she lost her train of thought. Letters don&#039;t work that way. Things like this are why letter stories are so much harder to write than everyone thinks they are, though you&#039;re doing better than most.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her school year just ended//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;between working my mail route and my new gig as a waitress at the Cumulus Club//</span><br />Again, this just screams exposition dump. Who would actually write like this? Sandy presumably knows her well enough to be aware of the mail route, so why would she spell it out like this? It takes great care to make these things be believable. She&#039;d likely just refer to the mail route as work, and then you could work in an anecdote to show what her job is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dead end//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I suppose that life is just one big aerial acrobatic, with each of us going through the motions. There are the ups and the downs, the twists and the turns, but never for a moment do I doubt that we&#039;re part of the same routine, and that you&#039;ll be there to catch me as I fall, as I will be for you.//</span><br />I&#039;ll be the first to say this is a subjective viewpoint, but the fact that she uses such flowery language here doesn&#039;t mesh at all with the harried mother just trying to find a moment of respite from her hyperactive daughter. It takes time to craft language like this, so when does she find a spare moment to do so? And if it&#039;s because she&#039;s leaving Scootaloo unsupervised while she does so, even the noise would grate on her. In short, she sounds way too composed for the image you&#039;re trying to create of her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;ve had broken limbs and muscle cramps, but this is something out of a nightmare, Sandy.//</span><br />You&#039;re using an awful lot of direct address in these letters. It&#039;s obvious to whom she&#039;s writing. You don&#039;t need to keep saying so. Direct address should be held for occasional emphasis. This is yet another speech affectation that shouldn&#039;t carry over to letters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sandy, I have cancer.//</span><br />Given that her complaints have been largely about her lifestyle and very little about physical discomfort, this just comes out of left field. It&#039;d take time for that blood test to come back, and in the meantime, she never wrote Sandy about her concerns?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The doctor even told me that if I make it to remission, there is a good chance that the cancer will come back//</span><br />Sounds like awful bedside manner to me. Being truthful is one thing, but bleak?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know that survival rates for my cancer are pretty high//</span><br />So what happened to the &quot;even if you go into remission, the cancer will probably return&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I haven&#039;t been able to get a proper diagnosis from an oncologist//</span><br />She&#039;s starting a treatment program without a proper diagnosis?<br /><br />I can&#039;t tell you not to put links in your story, but it&#039;s generally a bad idea to encourage people to click away from your story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my first of many surgeries//</span><br />You really are rushing through this. It&#039;s unusual to go to surgery until after a course of chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment. You made an oblique reference to such, but not in a way that she was going through it herself, or how it made her feel. Surely that would have been noteworthy enough to write about.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mine and my daughter&#039;s future//</span><br />my<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can&#039;t even think straight. My hooves are shaking, despite the medicine they gave me to calm me before anesthesia.//</span><br />Again, this is awfully technical for a letter, and so formal as to undercut any sense of fear that the text is trying to assure me is there. She can&#039;t think straight, and yet she can wax poetic and say things like &quot;as if I were floating in some surreal dream world where the universe and karma take turns playing cruel jokes on me.&quot; I don&#039;t buy it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s so cold in this hospital//</span><br />It&#039;s also unhealthy for her to be so. The staff don&#039;t want her to be cold. They&#039;d adjust the thermostat, bring in extra blankets, something.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;placing some port beneath my skin//</span><br />Now this makes sense. But why hasn&#039;t she mentioned it until now? This is the third time she&#039;s brought up surgery, and it wouldn&#039;t have been a surprise.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;self esteem//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it doesn&#039;t take more than an hour or so for them to walk or fly right out the door they came in//</span><br />So why did Dash have to stay in the hospital?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We are, all of us, bound to magic. As much as I&#039;m sure you&#039;re pained to admit it, we ponies are as magical as the dragons themselves. Furthermore, each pony has a unique magic to themselves. These mana conduits, as the doctor calls them, run through our bodies like invisible blood vessels, holding our spirits to our bodies. And when another pony&#039;s mana conduits cross our own, via something like using magic to stitch a broken bone… Well, the consequences are as terrifying as you&#039;ll likely believe.//</span><br />Headcanon infodump is a bad thing when trying to keep up an emotional moment. This is all pretty irrelevant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which in this unfortunate case, means the leukemia would grow out of control and kill me within minutes//</span><br />That depends, doesn&#039;t it? Presumably the doctors can control what grows and what doesn&#039;t. Forcing skin cells to reproduce so that they cover a wound without making the blood cells within the skin&#039;s capillaries also reproduce, for instance. So why couldn&#039;t a doctor enhance the body&#039;s immune response, which is generally overpowered by serious cancer, while simultaneously not enhancing the growth of the cancer itself?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And I&#039;m almost certain my mane is falling out.//</span><br />Seems like the kind of thing she&#039;d know pretty definitively.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The nurses took Scootaloo, Sandy. My baby girl isn&#039;t here. She was crying too much, so they took her away, and now I&#039;m crying too.//</span><br />Where did they take her, and why would they prevent her from visiting at all? This falls under the heading of &quot;piling on.&quot; You don&#039;t need to add tragedy for the sake of tragedy. The least amount of tragedy needed to make the story work is generally the best.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shorn//</span><br />Well, no, they fell out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;run by a delightful young mare who runs//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;custom made//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I must apologize for the… urgency, I suppose… in my last letter.//</span><br />Again, this is something you&#039;d do with speech, not with writing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one to many ciders//</span><br />to/too confusion<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long term//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;short term//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s been two weeks to the day that I was first diagnosed with leukemia//</span><br />She&#039;s gone bald in less than two weeks? That would be very unusual.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t know why, it&#039;s something I ought to be used to by now.//</span><br />Comma splice. You&#039;ve tacked together two complete sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;being their for your loved ones//</span><br />there/their confusion<br /><br />Your mechanics were quite good, so I don&#039;t have too many complaints there. As such, I was able to go into more depth with my in-line comments and don&#039;t really need to say much more here. My main issues are that the letters are often inconsistent in tone with Firefly&#039;s state of mind, and that there are a number of things that are incompatible with a letter-format story (a common error in this type of story).<br /><br />Watch your &quot;to be&quot; verbs, though. I only searched for the two simplest ones—is and was—and still found 120. It makes your story much more interesting to choose more active verbs. Using &quot;to be&quot; verbs is pretty inevitable, but I bet you could cut that down significantly.<br /><br />Now, to the tumblr you link. Is that your tumblr? If not, have you gotten permission from the owner to use his story? It&#039;s also odd that you rely on the tumblr itself to tell a bit of the story, namely that Sandy was there when Firefly died. And as far in debt as Firefly was, it really rang hollow that Sandy couldn&#039;t somehow raise train fare for what is a really short trip (remember, in &quot;The Best Night Ever,&quot; a coach trip at a walking pace from Canterlot to Ponyville took just a few hours). I was certain you&#039;d somehow play it that Sandy was intentionally avoiding Firefly.<br /><br />Next, emotions work best in contrast. You start off with a miserable mother, and everything just goes down from there. You have but a few one-sentence light moments anywhere in the story. Sad is sad when it&#039;s compared to happy. It&#039;d serve your story much better if you worked in some upbeat moments.<br /><br />Lastly, it&#039;s a bit weak on the conflict. Like I said, I thought you were building toward some confrontation between Sandy and Firefly. As it is, we just have this omnipresent tragedy, but we don&#039;t really see anything change as a result of it. There&#039;s no resolution of interpersonal conflict, no moment of character growth. A story can survive without such, but rare is the story that can do it well. You&#039;re relying on the sadness only, and that&#039;s a very tricky balancing act to achieve.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 28

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Hearths Warming Eve//
Hearth's

>Can Rarity turn an old Dress Me Daisy doll into the perfect present before morning?//

As these things go, this isn't too bad, but it's considered bad practice to use rhetorical questions in your synopsis.

Story:
>Rarity sighed with relief//
I've seen that you submitted several stories within a short time, so while it's reasonable that you wouldn't have been able to incorporate the feedback from the earliest ones into the later ones, I believe you would have been given the "show, don't tell" speech by now. In case you haven't, or it didn't sink in, please refer to the relevant section at the top of this thread. (If you got a review from Amacita on one of your stories, this is the same discussion that he uses.)

>her magically levitating sewing needle//

"Magically" is redundant here. There's no other means by which it would levitate, so it's unnecessary to say so.

>it was obviously intended//

Be careful when you say something is obvious. Obvious to whom? The narrator hasn't adopted any particular character's perspective yet, and in being thusly objective, he shouldn't be expressing his own opinions. It's essentially telling the reader it should be obvious to him, and readers generally don't like being told what they should think. The other issue: Your first paragraph has four sentences and four "to be" verbs. These are inherently boring verbs. While it's not necessary or even advisable to avoid them altogether, staying away from them whenever possible is a good idea. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. And active verbs will serve you well at the beginning, where you're trying to grab the reader. Take your "In front of her was a small dress form" versus "In front of her sat a small dress form." It's easy to fix in many cases, ad it makes a big but subtle difference.

>Opal purred and clawed at the carpet, curling herself up for a nap.//

Two issues here. First, the "curling…" phrase is a misplaced modifier, and participles are especially common for those. Descriptors like to latch onto the nearest object, so it sounds like the carpet is curling her up for a nap. Next, the use of the participial phrase at all. Well over half your sentences so far either have a participial phrase or an absolute phrase (which use participle verb forms). Such structural repetition can get your story in a rut. I'm very aware that I'm reading so many of them, and you don't want the writing itself to distract the reader from the story.

>Rarity heard a knock on her door and slowly trotted over//

This made me look, since you just used the word "slowly" not long ago. It turns out you only use it 7 times in the story, which isn't bad at all, but when you do use it, you tend to do so in clusters, so it still creates a repetitive feel.

>size and intensity of the knocking//

What exactly would the size of knocking be?

>into my nice clean floor//

"Onto" sounds better, imo.

>Orphan Foals Shelter//

Wouldn't that be Orphaned? And maybe Foals'?

>Pinkie left some holiday cookies on the table, feel free to help yourself.//

Comma splice. You've got two complete sentences tacked together with one.

>said Sweetie Belle, skulking over to the kitchen table and putting on her most theatrical frown//

Here's another issue with your narrative voice. You'd eventually settled into Rarity as your perspective character, but here, you pop into Sweetie Belle's for a single sentence. Only she would know it was her most theatrical smile, and not just a theatrical smile. You have to be careful who your perspective character is and which information she would actually have access to.

>Pinkie could make anyone smile//

"Anypony," perhaps?

>leaving only one thing unfinished - the packing and wrapping of the dress she’d made for Sweetie Belle.//

Please use a proper dash, but in this instance, a colon would be more appropriate, since you're clarifying or defining the "one thing." Though, I'd also argue that the passive voice is unnecessary here. Just "packing and wrapping the dress she’d made for Sweetie Belle" would do. For other dashes throughout the story, see the hyphen/dash use section at the top of this thread.

>ready to be placed under the tree//

Again, unnecessary passive voice. In addition to diverting the action, passive voice also leads to overuse of "to be" verbs. You could just say "ready to go under the tree," and it'd be much more active without losing any meaning.

>Apparently the little filly had decided to try to open some of the cabinets that were out of her reach by piling the pots and pans on top of one another.//

How could she tell this after they'd fallen? It's a bit of a leap. Lead me through her conclusion.

>ARE//

Italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis.

>And she knew how much her father loved them.//

By now, I've noticed how often you tell us what Rarity "knew." It's also starting to get repetitive, but it's also the type of information to avoid. Even if you just say "And her father certainly loved them," you've taken that bit out without changing anything.

>already forgetting the mess she made//

It's a completed action, so use a past participle. "she'd made"

>“That was baking, not cooking!”//

Well, she also tried to make juice, garnish some eggs, etc. without success.

>Rarity just pushed Sweetie Belle into the snow//

Suggest rephrasing, as this first comes across like a bully action, as if Rarity is shoving her to the ground.

>some day//

As phrased, you can use this as a single word.

>Thanks Mom//

Missing comma for direct address.

>doing her best to feign enthusiasm//

This is a tougher type of telling to detect, as you don't directly name any emotions, but you're still relying on me to create the scene for you. I don't know what this looks like—you don't create a visual.

>Rarity’s mild disappointment slowly shifted to mild panic//

And now you are directly naming emotions.

>Lil’//

Li'l

>but it was clear that she was near to tears//

How so? Paint the picture for me. It gets me much more connected to the characters to figure it out from the evidence than to have you tell me.

>With that//

Phrases like this and "at this point" that refer directly to the narration are a bad idea.

>as she thought aloud to herself//

A lot of this is unnecessary. Of course it's aloud, since you haven't punctuated it as a thought, and of course it's to herself, since nobody else is present.

A lot of these things Rarity says to herself are a bit formal, and she's talking to herself rather a lot. They may work better as indirect thoughts in the narration.

>These must be my old clothes//

Wait, so they give away Sweetie Belle's clothes, but not Rarity's?

>as she extracted the toy from underneath the crushed remains of a toy make-up kit//

Repetition of "toy."

>1/6th//

Spell out these numbers.

>and though the designs were a bit tight in a few places//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>one last look. There was one last thing//

Phrase repetition.

>How…How did you get in here Sweetie?//

Another missing comma for direct address, and please leave a space after the ellipsis.

>and when you didn’t come down for breakfast//

Another missing comma for the dependent clause.

>Sweetie was wearing the Hearth’s Warming Eve dress Rarity had made//

So, not only did she pick the lock without Rarity hearing, she put on the dress, found the doll and clothes, and kept her enthusiasm quiet enough not to wake Rarity, and then wakes her up? It doesn't seem to add up.

>Sweetie was positively brimming with happiness//

Show it. It's especially important, here at an emotional climax of the story.

>Rarity smiled, and put a hoof around her excited sister.//

See the section at the top of this thread about comma use with conjunctions.

>It’s very simple, you just take an existing pattern and divide all the measurements by six.//

Comma splice.

>following her sister with a mixture of awe and joy in her eyes//

More telling you'll want to fix.

>Hearths Warming//

Misspelled again.

I rather like this story. It's sweet and does a nice job of getting at that sisterly relationship. That said, there are obviously a few problems here. Most are with the writing style; I didn't find any glaring character or plot issues. The only other plot-related thing I'd point out is that close-knit families like this typically coordinate their gift-giving. On the one hand, Rarity should have known that her mom had gotten Sweetie Belle only clothes, and on the other, her mother should have known not to do that. She's already raised one filly, and apparently gave her a number of toys, so this isn't alien to her, even for someone like Rarity who probably preferred clothes. She's not suddenly going to be clueless on what to get her younger daughter. That might take a bit of thought to explain.

Now to the style issues. I marked a couple of odd point-of-view shifts and commented once about how you need to think about what your focus character would know. Shifts in perspective can be done, but only when necessary, and they need to be handled smoothly. For this story, I don't think you ever need to leave Rarity's head. You might want to refer to the head-hopping section at the top of this thread.

Next, you rely heavily on participles. Read back through and see how many sentences go "She performed this action, performing this other action." It gets your writing into a very clunky feel when the sentences have the same structure and rhythm over and over again. You need to vary this more.

I also commented that you seemed to be telling me what characters "knew" a lot. There are actually only 12 of these in the story, but they're all clustered up front, and it's weak to do this too often. Better to make a direct comment to the direct knowledge than use a "to know" or related verb.

Last one's the biggie: "to be" verbs.

was: 69
were: 21
be: 17
been: 11
is: 6
wasn't: 4
isn't: 2

And this is without checking more indeterminate ones like "there's" or "she's," though I don't recall seeing too many of those. The point is that these are weak verbs, and you're using a ton of them. They indicate overuse of telling (somewhat of an issue here), passive voice (a minor issue, but still present), or a need to choose more active verbs (we have a winner).

Now, look at another family of words: start/begin and their other forms. I counted 10, which doesn't sound like much, but most of them are within a few paragraphs of each other. It's also a fairly redundant verb—any given action would obviously begin. It's only worth noting when that beginning is abrupt, or the action never finishes.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearths Warming Eve//</span><br />Hearth&#039;s<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Can Rarity turn an old Dress Me Daisy doll into the perfect present before morning?//</span><br />As these things go, this isn&#039;t too bad, but it&#039;s considered bad practice to use rhetorical questions in your synopsis.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity sighed with relief//</span><br />I&#039;ve seen that you submitted several stories within a short time, so while it&#039;s reasonable that you wouldn&#039;t have been able to incorporate the feedback from the earliest ones into the later ones, I believe you would have been given the &quot;show, don&#039;t tell&quot; speech by now. In case you haven&#039;t, or it didn&#039;t sink in, please refer to the relevant section at the top of this thread. (If you got a review from Amacita on one of your stories, this is the same discussion that he uses.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her magically levitating sewing needle//</span><br />&quot;Magically&quot; is redundant here. There&#039;s no other means by which it would levitate, so it&#039;s unnecessary to say so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it was obviously intended//</span><br />Be careful when you say something is obvious. Obvious to whom? The narrator hasn&#039;t adopted any particular character&#039;s perspective yet, and in being thusly objective, he shouldn&#039;t be expressing his own opinions. It&#039;s essentially telling the reader it should be obvious to him, and readers generally don&#039;t like being told what they should think. The other issue: Your first paragraph has four sentences and four &quot;to be&quot; verbs. These are inherently boring verbs. While it&#039;s not necessary or even advisable to avoid them altogether, staying away from them whenever possible is a good idea. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. And active verbs will serve you well at the beginning, where you&#039;re trying to grab the reader. Take your &quot;In front of her was a small dress form&quot; versus &quot;In front of her sat a small dress form.&quot; It&#039;s easy to fix in many cases, ad it makes a big but subtle difference.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Opal purred and clawed at the carpet, curling herself up for a nap.//</span><br />Two issues here. First, the &quot;curling…&quot; phrase is a misplaced modifier, and participles are especially common for those. Descriptors like to latch onto the nearest object, so it sounds like the carpet is curling her up for a nap. Next, the use of the participial phrase at all. Well over half your sentences so far either have a participial phrase or an absolute phrase (which use participle verb forms). Such structural repetition can get your story in a rut. I&#039;m very aware that I&#039;m reading so many of them, and you don&#039;t want the writing itself to distract the reader from the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity heard a knock on her door and slowly trotted over//</span><br />This made me look, since you just used the word &quot;slowly&quot; not long ago. It turns out you only use it 7 times in the story, which isn&#039;t bad at all, but when you do use it, you tend to do so in clusters, so it still creates a repetitive feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;size and intensity of the knocking//</span><br />What exactly would the size of knocking be?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;into my nice clean floor//</span><br />&quot;Onto&quot; sounds better, imo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Orphan Foals Shelter//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t that be Orphaned? And maybe Foals&#039;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie left some holiday cookies on the table, feel free to help yourself.//</span><br />Comma splice. You&#039;ve got two complete sentences tacked together with one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said Sweetie Belle, skulking over to the kitchen table and putting on her most theatrical frown//</span><br />Here&#039;s another issue with your narrative voice. You&#039;d eventually settled into Rarity as your perspective character, but here, you pop into Sweetie Belle&#039;s for a single sentence. Only she would know it was her most theatrical smile, and not just <i>a</i> theatrical smile. You have to be careful who your perspective character is and which information she would actually have access to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie could make anyone smile//</span><br />&quot;Anypony,&quot; perhaps?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaving only one thing unfinished - the packing and wrapping of the dress she’d made for Sweetie Belle.//</span><br />Please use a proper dash, but in this instance, a colon would be more appropriate, since you&#039;re clarifying or defining the &quot;one thing.&quot; Though, I&#039;d also argue that the passive voice is unnecessary here. Just &quot;packing and wrapping the dress she’d made for Sweetie Belle&quot; would do. For other dashes throughout the story, see the hyphen/dash use section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ready to be placed under the tree//</span><br />Again, unnecessary passive voice. In addition to diverting the action, passive voice also leads to overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You could just say &quot;ready to go under the tree,&quot; and it&#039;d be much more active without losing any meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apparently the little filly had decided to try to open some of the cabinets that were out of her reach by piling the pots and pans on top of one another.//</span><br />How could she tell this after they&#039;d fallen? It&#039;s a bit of a leap. Lead me through her conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ARE//</span><br />Italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And she knew how much her father loved them.//</span><br />By now, I&#039;ve noticed how often you tell us what Rarity &quot;knew.&quot; It&#039;s also starting to get repetitive, but it&#039;s also the type of information to avoid. Even if you just say &quot;And her father certainly loved them,&quot; you&#039;ve taken that bit out without changing anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;already forgetting the mess she made//</span><br />It&#039;s a completed action, so use a past participle. &quot;she&#039;d made&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That was baking, not cooking!”//</span><br />Well, she also tried to make juice, garnish some eggs, etc. without success.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity just pushed Sweetie Belle into the snow//</span><br />Suggest rephrasing, as this first comes across like a bully action, as if Rarity is shoving her to the ground.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;some day//</span><br />As phrased, you can use this as a single word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thanks Mom//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;doing her best to feign enthusiasm//</span><br />This is a tougher type of telling to detect, as you don&#039;t directly name any emotions, but you&#039;re still relying on me to create the scene for you. I don&#039;t know what this looks like—you don&#039;t create a visual.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s mild disappointment slowly shifted to mild panic//</span><br />And now you <i>are</i> directly naming emotions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lil’//</span><br />Li&#039;l<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but it was clear that she was near to tears//</span><br />How so? Paint the picture for me. It gets me much more connected to the characters to figure it out from the evidence than to have you tell me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that//</span><br />Phrases like this and &quot;at this point&quot; that refer directly to the narration are a bad idea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she thought aloud to herself//</span><br />A lot of this is unnecessary. Of course it&#039;s aloud, since you haven&#039;t punctuated it as a thought, and of course it&#039;s to herself, since nobody else is present.<br /><br />A lot of these things Rarity says to herself are a bit formal, and she&#039;s talking to herself rather a lot. They may work better as indirect thoughts in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;These must be my old clothes//</span><br />Wait, so they give away Sweetie Belle&#039;s clothes, but not Rarity&#039;s?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she extracted the toy from underneath the crushed remains of a toy make-up kit//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;toy.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;1/6th//</span><br />Spell out these numbers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and though the designs were a bit tight in a few places//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one last look. There was one last thing//</span><br />Phrase repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How…How did you get in here Sweetie?//</span><br />Another missing comma for direct address, and please leave a space after the ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when you didn’t come down for breakfast//</span><br />Another missing comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie was wearing the Hearth’s Warming Eve dress Rarity had made//</span><br />So, not only did she pick the lock without Rarity hearing, she put on the dress, found the doll and clothes, and kept her enthusiasm quiet enough not to wake Rarity, and <i>then</i> wakes her up? It doesn&#039;t seem to add up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie was positively brimming with happiness//</span><br />Show it. It&#039;s especially important, here at an emotional climax of the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity smiled, and put a hoof around her excited sister.//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread about comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s very simple, you just take an existing pattern and divide all the measurements by six.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;following her sister with a mixture of awe and joy in her eyes//</span><br />More telling you&#039;ll want to fix.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearths Warming//</span><br />Misspelled again.<br /><br />I rather like this story. It&#039;s sweet and does a nice job of getting at that sisterly relationship. That said, there are obviously a few problems here. Most are with the writing style; I didn&#039;t find any glaring character or plot issues. The only other plot-related thing I&#039;d point out is that close-knit families like this typically coordinate their gift-giving. On the one hand, Rarity should have known that her mom had gotten Sweetie Belle only clothes, and on the other, her mother should have known not to do that. She&#039;s already raised one filly, and apparently gave her a number of toys, so this isn&#039;t alien to her, even for someone like Rarity who probably preferred clothes. She&#039;s not suddenly going to be clueless on what to get her younger daughter. That might take a bit of thought to explain.<br /><br />Now to the style issues. I marked a couple of odd point-of-view shifts and commented once about how you need to think about what your focus character would know. Shifts in perspective can be done, but only when necessary, and they need to be handled smoothly. For this story, I don&#039;t think you ever need to leave Rarity&#039;s head. You might want to refer to the head-hopping section at the top of this thread.<br /><br />Next, you rely <i>heavily</i> on participles. Read back through and see how many sentences go &quot;She performed this action, performing this other action.&quot; It gets your writing into a very clunky feel when the sentences have the same structure and rhythm over and over again. You need to vary this more.<br /><br />I also commented that you seemed to be telling me what characters &quot;knew&quot; a lot. There are actually only 12 of these in the story, but they&#039;re all clustered up front, and it&#039;s weak to do this too often. Better to make a direct comment to the direct knowledge than use a &quot;to know&quot; or related verb.<br /><br />Last one&#039;s the biggie: &quot;to be&quot; verbs.<br /><br />was: 69<br />were: 21<br />be: 17<br />been: 11<br />is: 6<br />wasn&#039;t: 4<br />isn&#039;t: 2<br /><br />And this is without checking more indeterminate ones like &quot;there&#039;s&quot; or &quot;she&#039;s,&quot; though I don&#039;t recall seeing too many of those. The point is that these are weak verbs, and you&#039;re using a ton of them. They indicate overuse of telling (somewhat of an issue here), passive voice (a minor issue, but still present), or a need to choose more active verbs (we have a winner).<br /><br />Now, look at another family of words: start/begin and their other forms. I counted 10, which doesn&#039;t sound like much, but most of them are within a few paragraphs of each other. It&#039;s also a fairly redundant verb—any given action would obviously begin. It&#039;s only worth noting when that beginning is abrupt, or the action never finishes.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Nov 2nd, 2013 16:58</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 29

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>a bunch of scarves which were hurriedly tossed on top//

This is a nonrestrictive clause; use "that," not "which."

>“We must hurry.”//

This line feels very detached. I get no sense of how she means it. She's forcing a grin, but she's not being insincere, so I can't realy tell what her state of mind is here.

>the basket was scooped up//

There's not really a reason to use passive voice here. If you wanted to draw attention to the basket, sure, but it doesn't hold any importance.

>The basket was magically hefted//

More unnecessary passive voice, and nearly the same phrasing as last time.

>where the sun was shining and uncomfortably hot on Opal’s fluffy pelt//

Precisely because of the fluffy pelt, it'd take a substantial delay before she felt the increased warmth.

>The basket was magically hefted into the air and towards the door they went//

Missing a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>easy going//

One word.

>but she’d learn to tolerate Rarity and her neurotic ways. But this//

I think you meant that to be "learned." And having the two "but" clauses in a row creates the feel of a double negative. You're excepting an exception.

>Often, Opal would awake in the dead of night to mutters and the shambling of hooves, and there would be Rarity, flustered, mane a mess as she trotted frantically about the boutique, her sewing glasses perched crooked on her muzzle as she dug through shelves of fabric.//

Here's a sentence that rambles on so long (to no purpose) that it loses focus. If each of these topics is important, then let them each get their own focus by chopping this up a bit. As it is, you're also repeating structures, which gives it a choppy feel. We have main clause, dependent clause, participial phrase, absolute phrase, dependent "as" clause, absolute phrase, dependent "as" clause.

>persisted on//

in

>It was only with great resilience did Opal finally stop pawing the bow from her hair.//

Syntax is off. Typical phrasing would be: "It was only with great resilience that Opal finally stopped…" I also question the word choice "resilience." It means to bounce back from a hardship. You seem to be aiming for something more like self-control.

>I’m here to examine your um… wears//

Unless you're going for a pun (and then having nobody react to it to complete the joke, for some reason), it's "wares."

>They were at a street vender//

"Vendor" is the preferred spelling. And that's a person. It makes more sense to say they're at a vendor's.

>draped with rolls of fabric and other decorations//

Why so vague? "Other decorations"? You're entirely relying on me to paint that picture. That's your job. And certainly Opal would be able to elaborate more on the fabric, given where she lives. She'd surely take notice of the colors, patterns, etc.

>Opal had to mewl silently to herself//

How does one do something silently that is, by definition, a noise?

>“Ah, Rarity!” the mousy mare exclaimed, “how nice to see you again!”//

You've punctuated/capitalized this as if the quote were a single, continuous sentence, yet you provided end punctuation to the first part. You can't have it both ways.

>eyes scanning the wears//

Yeah, you're spelling that wrong.

>She turned her head to the vendor//

Now you are spelling it this way. Make up your mind.

>on it’s cage and cocked it’s feathery head//

Its/it's confusion.

>The vendor deadpanned. “Zang?”//

Comma, not a period.

>Yes, Zang//

Inconsistent capitalization. And "zing" is a real word. Why are you inventing this one?

>Pizzaz, poof, fizzle//

Pizzazz. And I think you may have been going for "sizzle." "Fizzle" means something entirely different.

>The vendor maintained her bored and slightly irritated expression.//

You're also robbing me of the visual when you directly inform me of a character's emotions. What does this look like? This is a classic show-versus-tell problem. You might want to read that section at the top of this thread.

>Whenever Rarity was unhappy//

Missing comma after the dependent clause. You should read the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>but in the dead of night? In the dark?//

Somehow, I doubt this is the first time she's done this. She even refers to doing such in canon.

>nighttime Boutique//

I don't get the word choice "nighttime" here. Sure, it's night, but as a modifier? It makes it sound like an after-hours business.

>of still mare dressed in wedding attire//

Missing a word.

>stitching a short line in the flesh//

>stitched into her hoof//
Repetitive phrasing. In fact, it feels like there's a lot of repetitive description of this incident.

>Opal mewled quietly//

More repetition. She just "said quietly" a few lines back.

>Rarity fell asleep with the sewing machine on. Opal hissed quietly as she buried her head in her basket, trying to block out the sound.//

I don't see how this warrants being a scene.

>Opal lay in in the windowsill//

Repeated word.

>Apple Bloom said in compromise//

The "in compromise" is useless filler, and as the narrator is in Opal's perspective, and you've already said she doesn't understand what they say, how could she interpret it as compromise, especially that quickly?

>Sweetie Belle made a face//

What kind? Don't be so vague.

>The two other fillies both snickered and shamelessly tried to hide their laughter.//

How can they laugh and try to hide their laughing? It's redundant at least and contradictory at worst. And what's shameless about it?

>Sweetie Belle seemed rather eager to get away from the topic.//

How so? And how does Opal even know what the topic is? It also looks like you have a different indentation here.

>prefered //

Preferred.

>due to the occasion, though, mainly due to//

More repetition.

>Opal prowled for hours, doing cat-like things around town//

This really begs for more explanation, given that she's essentially the narrator and would find these activities enjoyable. There's no reason for her to gloss over them.

>the door that lead out//

led

>crumpled up and half-finished sketches. The wastebasket beside it had completely overflown and was spilling its contents of crumpled//

Repetition. And a missing hyphen.

>From the closet door, came//

Unneeded comma, since it leads into the verb.

>the two-inch opening the led off into darkness//

Typo.

>flailing her hind legs in the as she squirmed//

Another typo. Really, any word processor will catch many of these things. Mind the squiggly lines, please.

>a squinted look//

Just a squint will do.

>who’s eyebrows//

whose

>dress-up//

You din't hyphenate this earlier. Be consistent.

>Scootaloo’s left eyebrow was completely out of sight, the right one scrunched down right over her eye.”//

Extraneous quotation mark.

>Thank the can opener//

That right there is damn funny.

>A pillow that also didn’t appear to be working.//

She's the one using it. "Appear" shouldn't come into it. She'd know explicitly whether it was working.

>her eyes bore down upon to wear she was sewing//

That doesn't parse. I can't figure out exactly what you're trying to say. I think you mixed up "wear" with "where," but even that doesn't entirely fix it.

>catfood//

cat food

>Ponies never did smell good, but fear always smelled the worse.//

That "the" is extraneous.

>One stuck, the others bounced off and showered to the floor in a deafening clatter.//

Comma splice.

>Blue magic//

You described it as purple way back in the first scene.

>the fowl dress//

Foul. Unless you're making an awful "Scootaloo is a chicken" joke, in which case you're completely undercutting the story's tone.

>The real confusion set in she she//

I think you can see the problem.

There is a lot of repetition in this story. A few of the descriptions felt like they rehashed a small number of points multiple times, and there were many words and phrases that appeared two or three times within a couple of paragraphs. A few of the biggest offenders:

Various forms of "to be": is, 10; was, 124; be, 20; been, 18; wasn't, 13; isn't, 2. And those are just the easier ones to spot. This is a very boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. Take "his hair was red" versus "a shock of red hair sat atop his head." Even a touch of action makes it come alive. Overuse of these verbs can indicate too much passive voice, telly language, and a need to choose more active verbs, all of which I saw here.

You employ an awful lot of "as" clauses to the point that I became keenly aware of each additional one I saw. Not only does this create a repetitive, plodding feel, but it draws attention away from the story and onto the writing itself. It can also throw off the chronology, since these "as" clauses imply concurrent action which you may not have intended. You use "as" 48 times in the story; while not all were used in that sense, the majority were, and when you did use them, you tended to do so in clusters; there are quite a lot early on, which makes them stand out even more.

There was also a lot of telly language and some Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There are explanations of those at the top of this thread as well.

Lastly, there was a severe disconnect in your narrative voice. The story is ostensibly told from Opal's perspective, but it repeatedly makes judgment calls that she is incapable of. Part of this is related to show-versus-tell. When the narrator tells me someone is making a compromise, it's implying that Opal is telling me it's a compromise. For that to work, Opal would have to understand what a compromise is, and yet you stressed on more than one occasion that she finds ponies pretty strange and inscrutable, and she doesn't understand what they say. So how does she interpret their actions that way? Showing is about giving me the evidence and letting me draw the conclusions; this is especially necessary for a narrator like this one, who is in Opal's perspective and can't make these conclusions on her own. So showing would not only make the narrative voice more believable, but is good for engaging storytelling anyway. It's important to realize what your narrative point of view is and what it's capable of, then work within those limitations. Your descriptions of what she smells and senses from Rarity were good. Her blunt conclusions about other characters' emotions and intentions weren't.

I'm also curious about how Scootaloo went missing that long without anyone coming to inquire about her, and how she wouldn't have known where Sweetie Belle went. It doesn't seem like Sweetie Belle would go off without telling her.

As a concept, this story wasn't bad, and the unusual choice of an animal's perspective could make for a unique tale. And I have to admit to being a sucker for certain types of open-ended conclusions.

Edit: I asked another pre-reader for a second opinion as to whether the gore was too much. I thought it was probably fine, and he agreed, but he objected to using dialogue at all in a story told from a non-sentient animal's perspective. While I wouldn't go that far, I've already commented on how it's odd that Opal reacts to and often understands what the ponies do and say, particularly since you've explicitly said she doesn't understand their speech or actions.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bunch of scarves which were hurriedly tossed on top//</span><br />This is a nonrestrictive clause; use &quot;that,&quot; not &quot;which.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“We must hurry.”//</span><br />This line feels very detached. I get no sense of how she means it. She&#039;s forcing a grin, but she&#039;s not being insincere, so I can&#039;t realy tell what her state of mind is here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the basket was scooped up//</span><br />There&#039;s not really a reason to use passive voice here. If you wanted to draw attention to the basket, sure, but it doesn&#039;t hold any importance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The basket was magically hefted//</span><br />More unnecessary passive voice, and nearly the same phrasing as last time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;where the sun was shining and uncomfortably hot on Opal’s fluffy pelt//</span><br />Precisely because of the fluffy pelt, it&#039;d take a substantial delay before she felt the increased warmth.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The basket was magically hefted into the air and towards the door they went//</span><br />Missing a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;easy going//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but she’d learn to tolerate Rarity and her neurotic ways. But this//</span><br />I think you meant that to be &quot;learned.&quot; And having the two &quot;but&quot; clauses in a row creates the feel of a double negative. You&#039;re excepting an exception.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Often, Opal would awake in the dead of night to mutters and the shambling of hooves, and there would be Rarity, flustered, mane a mess as she trotted frantically about the boutique, her sewing glasses perched crooked on her muzzle as she dug through shelves of fabric.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a sentence that rambles on so long (to no purpose) that it loses focus. If each of these topics is important, then let them each get their own focus by chopping this up a bit. As it is, you&#039;re also repeating structures, which gives it a choppy feel. We have main clause, dependent clause, participial phrase, absolute phrase, dependent &quot;as&quot; clause, absolute phrase, dependent &quot;as&quot; clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;persisted on//</span><br />in<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was only with great resilience did Opal finally stop pawing the bow from her hair.//</span><br />Syntax is off. Typical phrasing would be: &quot;It was only with great resilience that Opal finally stopped…&quot; I also question the word choice &quot;resilience.&quot; It means to bounce back from a hardship. You seem to be aiming for something more like self-control.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m here to examine your um… wears//</span><br />Unless you&#039;re going for a pun (and then having nobody react to it to complete the joke, for some reason), it&#039;s &quot;wares.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They were at a street vender//</span><br />&quot;Vendor&quot; is the preferred spelling. And that&#039;s a person. It makes more sense to say they&#039;re at a vendor&#039;s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;draped with rolls of fabric and other decorations//</span><br />Why so vague? &quot;Other decorations&quot;? You&#039;re entirely relying on me to paint that picture. That&#039;s your job. And certainly Opal would be able to elaborate more on the fabric, given where she lives. She&#039;d surely take notice of the colors, patterns, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Opal had to mewl silently to herself//</span><br />How does one do something silently that is, by definition, a noise?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Ah, Rarity!” the mousy mare exclaimed, “how nice to see you again!”//</span><br />You&#039;ve punctuated/capitalized this as if the quote were a single, continuous sentence, yet you provided end punctuation to the first part. You can&#039;t have it both ways.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyes scanning the wears//</span><br />Yeah, you&#039;re spelling that wrong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned her head to the vendor//</span><br />Now you <i>are</i> spelling it this way. Make up your mind.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on it’s cage and cocked it’s feathery head//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The vendor deadpanned. “Zang?”//</span><br />Comma, not a period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes, Zang//</span><br />Inconsistent capitalization. And &quot;zing&quot; is a real word. Why are you inventing this one?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pizzaz, poof, fizzle//</span><br />Pizzazz. And I think you may have been going for &quot;sizzle.&quot; &quot;Fizzle&quot; means something entirely different.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The vendor maintained her bored and slightly irritated expression.//</span><br />You&#039;re also robbing me of the visual when you directly inform me of a character&#039;s emotions. What does this look like? This is a classic show-versus-tell problem. You might want to read that section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Whenever Rarity was unhappy//</span><br />Missing comma after the dependent clause. You should read the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but in the dead of night? In the dark?//</span><br />Somehow, I doubt this is the first time she&#039;s done this. She even refers to doing such in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nighttime Boutique//</span><br />I don&#039;t get the word choice &quot;nighttime&quot; here. Sure, it&#039;s night, but as a modifier? It makes it sound like an after-hours business.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of still mare dressed in wedding attire//</span><br />Missing a word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stitching a short line in the flesh//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stitched into her hoof//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing. In fact, it feels like there&#039;s a lot of repetitive description of this incident.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Opal mewled quietly//</span><br />More repetition. She just &quot;said quietly&quot; a few lines back.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity fell asleep with the sewing machine on. Opal hissed quietly as she buried her head in her basket, trying to block out the sound.//</span><br />I don&#039;t see how this warrants being a scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Opal lay in in the windowsill//</span><br />Repeated word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom said in compromise//</span><br />The &quot;in compromise&quot; is useless filler, and as the narrator is in Opal&#039;s perspective, and you&#039;ve already said she doesn&#039;t understand what they say, how could she interpret it as compromise, especially that quickly?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle made a face//</span><br />What kind? Don&#039;t be so vague.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two other fillies both snickered and shamelessly tried to hide their laughter.//</span><br />How can they laugh and try to hide their laughing? It&#039;s redundant at least and contradictory at worst. And what&#039;s shameless about it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle seemed rather eager to get away from the topic.//</span><br />How so? And how does Opal even know what the topic is? It also looks like you have a different indentation here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;prefered //</span><br />Preferred.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;due to the occasion, though, mainly due to//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Opal prowled for hours, doing cat-like things around town//</span><br />This really begs for more explanation, given that she&#039;s essentially the narrator and would find these activities enjoyable. There&#039;s no reason for her to gloss over them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the door that lead out//</span><br />led<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crumpled up and half-finished sketches. The wastebasket beside it had completely overflown and was spilling its contents of crumpled//</span><br />Repetition. And a missing hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;From the closet door, came//</span><br />Unneeded comma, since it leads into the verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the two-inch opening the led off into darkness//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flailing her hind legs in the as she squirmed//</span><br />Another typo. Really, any word processor will catch many of these things. Mind the squiggly lines, please.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a squinted look//</span><br />Just a squint will do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who’s eyebrows//</span><br />whose<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dress-up//</span><br />You din&#039;t hyphenate this earlier. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo’s left eyebrow was completely out of sight, the right one scrunched down right over her eye.”//</span><br />Extraneous quotation mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thank the can opener//</span><br />That right there is damn funny.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A pillow that also didn’t appear to be working.//</span><br />She&#039;s the one using it. &quot;Appear&quot; shouldn&#039;t come into it. She&#039;d know explicitly whether it was working.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyes bore down upon to wear she was sewing//</span><br />That doesn&#039;t parse. I can&#039;t figure out exactly what you&#039;re trying to say. I think you mixed up &quot;wear&quot; with &quot;where,&quot; but even that doesn&#039;t entirely fix it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;catfood//</span><br />cat food<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponies never did smell good, but fear always smelled the worse.//</span><br />That &quot;the&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One stuck, the others bounced off and showered to the floor in a deafening clatter.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Blue magic//</span><br />You described it as purple way back in the first scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the fowl dress//</span><br />Foul. Unless you&#039;re making an awful &quot;Scootaloo is a chicken&quot; joke, in which case you&#039;re completely undercutting the story&#039;s tone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The real confusion set in she she//</span><br />I think you can see the problem.<br /><br />There is a lot of repetition in this story. A few of the descriptions felt like they rehashed a small number of points multiple times, and there were many words and phrases that appeared two or three times within a couple of paragraphs. A few of the biggest offenders:<br /><br />Various forms of &quot;to be&quot;: is, 10; was, 124; be, 20; been, 18; wasn&#039;t, 13; isn&#039;t, 2. And those are just the easier ones to spot. This is a very boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. Take &quot;his hair was red&quot; versus &quot;a shock of red hair sat atop his head.&quot; Even a touch of action makes it come alive. Overuse of these verbs can indicate too much passive voice, telly language, and a need to choose more active verbs, all of which I saw here.<br /><br />You employ an awful lot of &quot;as&quot; clauses to the point that I became keenly aware of each additional one I saw. Not only does this create a repetitive, plodding feel, but it draws attention away from the story and onto the writing itself. It can also throw off the chronology, since these &quot;as&quot; clauses imply concurrent action which you may not have intended. You use &quot;as&quot; 48 times in the story; while not all were used in that sense, the majority were, and when you did use them, you tended to do so in clusters; there are quite a lot early on, which makes them stand out even more.<br /><br />There was also a lot of telly language and some Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There are explanations of those at the top of this thread as well.<br /><br />Lastly, there was a severe disconnect in your narrative voice. The story is ostensibly told from Opal&#039;s perspective, but it repeatedly makes judgment calls that she is incapable of. Part of this is related to show-versus-tell. When the narrator tells me someone is making a compromise, it&#039;s implying that Opal is telling me it&#039;s a compromise. For that to work, Opal would have to understand what a compromise is, and yet you stressed on more than one occasion that she finds ponies pretty strange and inscrutable, and she doesn&#039;t understand what they say. So how does she interpret their actions that way? Showing is about giving me the evidence and letting me draw the conclusions; this is especially necessary for a narrator like this one, who is in Opal&#039;s perspective and can&#039;t make these conclusions on her own. So showing would not only make the narrative voice more believable, but is good for engaging storytelling anyway. It&#039;s important to realize what your narrative point of view is and what it&#039;s capable of, then work within those limitations. Your descriptions of what she smells and senses from Rarity were good. Her blunt conclusions about other characters&#039; emotions and intentions weren&#039;t.<br /><br />I&#039;m also curious about how Scootaloo went missing that long without anyone coming to inquire about her, and how she wouldn&#039;t have known where Sweetie Belle went. It doesn&#039;t seem like Sweetie Belle would go off without telling her.<br /><br />As a concept, this story wasn&#039;t bad, and the unusual choice of an animal&#039;s perspective could make for a unique tale. And I have to admit to being a sucker for certain types of open-ended conclusions.<br /><br />Edit: I asked another pre-reader for a second opinion as to whether the gore was too much. I thought it was probably fine, and he agreed, but he objected to using dialogue at all in a story told from a non-sentient animal&#039;s perspective. While I wouldn&#039;t go that far, I&#039;ve already commented on how it&#039;s odd that Opal reacts to and often understands what the ponies do and say, particularly since you&#039;ve explicitly said she doesn&#039;t understand their speech or actions.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Nov 2nd, 2013 21:19</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 30

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>It was warm in the apple grove, but Applejack was cold inside.//

Alright, first sentence, and you're already beating me over the head. Slight weather-report opening here, but not too bad. However, throw me some imagery. I like the contrasting hot/cold thing, but you can achieve it with a much less blunt instrument. Especially on the cold side—you don't want to disarm any process of discovery about the characters' emotions, particularly right off the bat, where you need to grab the reader's attention. You might want to read over the show-versus-tell section at the top of this thread.

>She stood on the bank of the pond, looking out over the murky water.//

This isn't a bad one, as examples go, but you need to watch out for misplaced modifiers. Participial phrases are a common problem in this respect. Due to their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the pond is looking out over the water. A bit of logic helps the reader sort it out on his own, but if you let too many of these slip, you will eventually run into ones that are vague or outright misleading.

>The sun was shining, and the day was a little warmer than Applejack would have liked//

I can see I'm going to have an issue with your "to be" verbs. More on this later, but note that I'm only five sentences in, and I've already counted five instances of "was."

>It felt better in the shade of the apple trees, away from the gaze of the sun.//

Watch these indirect possessions. They're often clunky and unnecessary. When they do work is where they shift focus onto the object because what owns that object is immaterial. I'd say you're justified in that respect for the first one—the shade is much more pertinent that the trees. But in the second, the sun is more important than the gaze, so rephrasing as "the sun's gaze" is more direct and concise while losing no meaning and placing the focus more judiciously.

>The only way into the grove was to follow the stream through a small gap in the trees, and it was very out of the way of the road//

That seems odd. Growing the trees so close together would restrict their ability to produce fruit and make them more difficult to harvest. Plus, a pond is a very useful asset for a farm, so making it inaccessible doesn't ring true. That last bit is awkwardly worded, too.

>one way or the either//

one way or the other

>With deft, earth-pony manipulations of her hooves//

I don't see what's more deft about earth ponies' hooves. It's fine if you want that to be a conceit for your story, but referencing a piece of headcanon obliquely like that is pretty jarring, not to mention that it's immaterial to the story.

>Even thinking the name sent a pang of regret//

Yeah, read the show-versus-tell part. It directly talks about this kind of phrasing. Some of it's okay in a story, but use it sparingly.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

As per canon, Sugarcube Corner.

>setting her mind to overdrive//

Minor point here, and feel free to ignore me, but this word choice is odd. "Overdrive" references a technology that doesn't exist in Equestria, at least as far as we've seen in canon.

>“Rarity, I think I love you!”//

Um… why doesn't this have the Romance/Shipping tag?

>like an incomprehensible river of repressed feelings//

They are repressed feelings, so it kind of robs your simile of its imagery.

>There was only confusion, and amusement.//

>Then that look changed, replaced by utter confusion in an instant.//
These would seem to be contradictory.

>and the water was slightly discolored from the runoff of the newsprint//

If it has as much current as you say it does, this wouldn't happen. No ink from any previous trip would be left by the time the next boat came along.

>Sweet Apple Acres had always passed to a daughter or granddaughter//

So what about Apple Bloom?

>Her family would be there for her, but Granny Smith would be disappointed, even if she didn’t mean to be, even if she still loved and cherished Applejack with all her heart, she would never get to see any great-grandfoals.//

Depending on how you wanted this to be structured, one of the last two commas is a splice.

>Applejack turned around.//

Repetitive phrasing with a couple sentences ago.

>Then, “Can we talk?”//

A bit too vague as to who says this.

>unphased//

unfazed

>I’ve been shot down more times than a lady would care to admit//

This might need some justification, too. Look how easily she manipulated stallions through flirting in "Putting Your Hoof Down" and "The Best Night Ever." Aside from the singular example of Blueblood, she seems to be able to get what she wants.

>How am I supposed to help you model dresses like I do sometimes//

Okay, this sounds very unlike Applejack. Not that you can't make her into that, but it's a pretty drastic change from canon that begs explanation. More on this later.

>How am I supposed to let you smile at me and flutter your eyelashes all playful like and call me ‘darling’ and not read too much into it//

You've been using commas with these extended lists of "and" or "or." Be consistent.

>marry some stallion anyway because it would be the right thing to do//

This "right thing" phrasing really cuts against a lot of the things you'd been saying, that her attraction to Rarity wouldn't be stigmatized, even by Granny Smith. Either she persnoally thinks something's wrong with it, which would be an interesting conflict to follow if you care to develop it, or this just comes across as contradictory.

>Her eyes swam in a sea of salt.//

Awkward phrasing.

>nearly-finished//

-ly adverbs are generally exempt from such hyphenation.

>after all they had been thorough//

Typo.

>Rarity nodded, patted Applejack on the shoulder, and headed for the small opening where the grove opened up to the rest of the fields.//

If this is such a secret place, how did Rarity know where it was in the first place? Not that this can't be explained—I'll touch on this in a moment.

Closing time. I liked this story. It's a nice take on this type of infatuation, one that I rarely see. Applejack's not hampered by anyone's opinion of the appropriateness of her attraction, but Rarity simply doesn't return it. It's unusual to see a take on it where everything doesn't magically work out.

That said, it has a common issue with romance stories: it drops us into the middle of things and expects us to drum up the enthusiasm for this pairing on our own without providing it in the story. How that's done really depends on the story. In some cases, it really means going back to square one and taking us through the entire relationship. In some, that's overkill, and that's probably the case here. But you have to give us something. You can't just jump into "oh, AJ's madly fallen for Rarity" and expect us to swallow it whole. Make it real. Why does AJ feel that way? What times in the past has Rarity done something to endear herself to AJ, unintentionally, of course. Let me see these. A few flashbacks that take us through the phases of this relationship would go a long way—when AJ first thought something but tried to deny it, once she had to accept it, when it became a significant source of stress. And that brings up two side points. The scene at Sugarcube Corner might do better as a flashback as well. I'm glad that you did include dialogue there and didn't gloss over it entirely as narration, but if you do decide to include other flashbacks, it might create a more consistent feel to do this bit like that as well. Also, AJ is pretty clueless about whether Rarity might return her feelings. As such good friends as they are and as much time as they supposedly spent together, AJ must have some idea. When did she try to tease that info out of Rarity, drop hints, read her reaction? It's a bit of a stretch to think she's completely in the dark here. Of course, better informed doesn't necessarily mean correct.

The only other big issue I see is your overuse of "to be" verbs. I only searched for the two most common forms, is and was, and came up with over seventy. That's far too many for this word count. It's an inherently boring verb. Readers are much more interested in what happens, not what simply is. Overuse of "to be" verbs tends to indicate three problems: too much passive voice (I didn't notice any), too much telly language (you did fine on this front, too—I only had to point out a couple of places), and a need to choose more active verbs (that's the biggie). Go back through and see what you can do about those. It's impractical to remove all of them, but I bet you can get rid of over half without much trouble. It doesn't even take much fancy language. Just "he sat there" versus "he was there" gives a more active feel to the writing.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was warm in the apple grove, but Applejack was cold inside.//</span><br />Alright, first sentence, and you&#039;re already beating me over the head. Slight weather-report opening here, but not too bad. However, throw me some imagery. I like the contrasting hot/cold thing, but you can achieve it with a much less blunt instrument. Especially on the cold side—you don&#039;t want to disarm any process of discovery about the characters&#039; emotions, particularly right off the bat, where you need to grab the reader&#039;s attention. You might want to read over the show-versus-tell section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stood on the bank of the pond, looking out over the murky water.//</span><br />This isn&#039;t a bad one, as examples go, but you need to watch out for misplaced modifiers. Participial phrases are a common problem in this respect. Due to their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the pond is looking out over the water. A bit of logic helps the reader sort it out on his own, but if you let too many of these slip, you will eventually run into ones that are vague or outright misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sun was shining, and the day was a little warmer than Applejack would have liked//</span><br />I can see I&#039;m going to have an issue with your &quot;to be&quot; verbs. More on this later, but note that I&#039;m only five sentences in, and I&#039;ve already counted five instances of &quot;was.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It felt better in the shade of the apple trees, away from the gaze of the sun.//</span><br />Watch these indirect possessions. They&#039;re often clunky and unnecessary. When they do work is where they shift focus onto the object because what owns that object is immaterial. I&#039;d say you&#039;re justified in that respect for the first one—the shade is much more pertinent that the trees. But in the second, the sun is more important than the gaze, so rephrasing as &quot;the sun&#039;s gaze&quot; is more direct and concise while losing no meaning and placing the focus more judiciously.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The only way into the grove was to follow the stream through a small gap in the trees, and it was very out of the way of the road//</span><br />That seems odd. Growing the trees so close together would restrict their ability to produce fruit and make them more difficult to harvest. Plus, a pond is a very useful asset for a farm, so making it inaccessible doesn&#039;t ring true. That last bit is awkwardly worded, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one way or the either//</span><br />one way or the other<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With deft, earth-pony manipulations of her hooves//</span><br />I don&#039;t see what&#039;s more deft about earth ponies&#039; hooves. It&#039;s fine if you want that to be a conceit for your story, but referencing a piece of headcanon obliquely like that is pretty jarring, not to mention that it&#039;s immaterial to the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even thinking the name sent a pang of regret//</span><br />Yeah, read the show-versus-tell part. It directly talks about this kind of phrasing. Some of it&#039;s okay in a story, but use it sparingly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sugar Cube Corner//</span><br />As per canon, Sugarcube Corner.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;setting her mind to overdrive//</span><br />Minor point here, and feel free to ignore me, but this word choice is odd. &quot;Overdrive&quot; references a technology that doesn&#039;t exist in Equestria, at least as far as we&#039;ve seen in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Rarity, I think I love you!”//</span><br />Um… why doesn&#039;t this have the Romance/Shipping tag?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like an incomprehensible river of repressed feelings//</span><br />They <i>are</i> repressed feelings, so it kind of robs your simile of its imagery.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was only confusion, and amusement.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then that look changed, replaced by utter confusion in an instant.//</span><br />These would seem to be contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the water was slightly discolored from the runoff of the newsprint//</span><br />If it has as much current as you say it does, this wouldn&#039;t happen. No ink from any previous trip would be left by the time the next boat came along.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweet Apple Acres had always passed to a daughter or granddaughter//</span><br />So what about Apple Bloom?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her family would be there for her, but Granny Smith would be disappointed, even if she didn’t mean to be, even if she still loved and cherished Applejack with all her heart, she would never get to see any great-grandfoals.//</span><br />Depending on how you wanted this to be structured, one of the last two commas is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack turned around.//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing with a couple sentences ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then, “Can we talk?”//</span><br />A bit too vague as to who says this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unphased//</span><br />unfazed<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve been shot down more times than a lady would care to admit//</span><br />This might need some justification, too. Look how easily she manipulated stallions through flirting in &quot;Putting Your Hoof Down&quot; and &quot;The Best Night Ever.&quot; Aside from the singular example of Blueblood, she seems to be able to get what she wants.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How am I supposed to help you model dresses like I do sometimes//</span><br />Okay, this sounds very unlike Applejack. Not that you can&#039;t make her into that, but it&#039;s a pretty drastic change from canon that begs explanation. More on this later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How am I supposed to let you smile at me and flutter your eyelashes all playful like and call me ‘darling’ and not read too much into it//</span><br />You&#039;ve been using commas with these extended lists of &quot;and&quot; or &quot;or.&quot; Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;marry some stallion anyway because it would be the right thing to do//</span><br />This &quot;right thing&quot; phrasing really cuts against a lot of the things you&#039;d been saying, that her attraction to Rarity wouldn&#039;t be stigmatized, even by Granny Smith. Either she persnoally thinks something&#039;s wrong with it, which would be an interesting conflict to follow if you care to develop it, or this just comes across as contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes swam in a sea of salt.//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nearly-finished//</span><br />-ly adverbs are generally exempt from such hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after all they had been thorough//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity nodded, patted Applejack on the shoulder, and headed for the small opening where the grove opened up to the rest of the fields.//</span><br />If this is such a secret place, how did Rarity know where it was in the first place? Not that this can&#039;t be explained—I&#039;ll touch on this in a moment.<br /><br />Closing time. I liked this story. It&#039;s a nice take on this type of infatuation, one that I rarely see. Applejack&#039;s not hampered by anyone&#039;s opinion of the appropriateness of her attraction, but Rarity simply doesn&#039;t return it. It&#039;s unusual to see a take on it where everything doesn&#039;t magically work out.<br /><br />That said, it has a common issue with romance stories: it drops us into the middle of things and expects us to drum up the enthusiasm for this pairing on our own without providing it in the story. How that&#039;s done really depends on the story. In some cases, it really means going back to square one and taking us through the entire relationship. In some, that&#039;s overkill, and that&#039;s probably the case here. But you have to give us <i>something</i>. You can&#039;t just jump into &quot;oh, AJ&#039;s madly fallen for Rarity&quot; and expect us to swallow it whole. Make it real. Why does AJ feel that way? What times in the past has Rarity done something to endear herself to AJ, unintentionally, of course. Let me see these. A few flashbacks that take us through the phases of this relationship would go a long way—when AJ first thought something but tried to deny it, once she had to accept it, when it became a significant source of stress. And that brings up two side points. The scene at Sugarcube Corner might do better as a flashback as well. I&#039;m glad that you did include dialogue there and didn&#039;t gloss over it entirely as narration, but if you do decide to include other flashbacks, it might create a more consistent feel to do this bit like that as well. Also, AJ is pretty clueless about whether Rarity might return her feelings. As such good friends as they are and as much time as they supposedly spent together, AJ must have some idea. When did she try to tease that info out of Rarity, drop hints, read her reaction? It&#039;s a bit of a stretch to think she&#039;s completely in the dark here. Of course, better informed doesn&#039;t necessarily mean correct.<br /><br />The only other big issue I see is your overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. I only searched for the two most common forms, is and was, and came up with over seventy. That&#039;s far too many for this word count. It&#039;s an inherently boring verb. Readers are much more interested in what happens, not what simply <i>is</i>. Overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs tends to indicate three problems: too much passive voice (I didn&#039;t notice any), too much telly language (you did fine on this front, too—I only had to point out a couple of places), and a need to choose more active verbs (that&#039;s the biggie). Go back through and see what you can do about those. It&#039;s impractical to remove all of them, but I bet you can get rid of over half without much trouble. It doesn&#039;t even take much fancy language. Just &quot;he sat there&quot; versus &quot;he was there&quot; gives a more active feel to the writing.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 31

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Quickly shaking the chill from her hooves//

Canon from "Winter Wrap Up" doesn't imply that handling snow clouds would do this.

>“Last one!” she said//

Somewhat repetitive with your first sentence.

>poofed//

It's not the best idea to use sound effects as your verb.

>and let her fall into the snowstorm beneath//

If it's gone, it's not there to let her do anything.

>Hundreds of snowflakes blew horizontally through the air//

The number is rather determinate. If she has a good feel for being able to gauge the amount, do something to indicate that; otherwise, it feels disconnected from her situation, since she'd be too distracted to count them. "Through the air" here is redundant/obvious.

>All of the ice, snow, and wind had rapidly changed the atmosphere from a mild cold to an arctic tundra.//

Two things: The description is incongruous, as you're likening the atmosphere to terrain. It's not a very apt comparison. Second, not that for snow to form, the air has to be cold already; the actual changing of water vapor to snowflakes warms the air up a little.

>Ponyville sat just a small ways//

You do see this in common usage, but technically, using "ways" as a singular is incorrect.

>Horse apples//

Typically written as one word.

>at the edge of her periphery//

Redundant. Periphery is the edge.

>What are you doing out here, Fluttershy?! Didn’t you notice the storm?!//

Okay, you're overdoing the interrobangs. They're fine for sparing use, but the more you have, the less effective they become. They make things stand out, and when everything stands out, nothing does.

>Class-4//

Write out numbers that short.

>Everyone//

everpony, perhaps?

>W-what about you?//

Consider what sounds actually gets repeated when writing a stutter. "Wh-what"

>eep

She actually said it, so lose the italics and put it in quotes.

>“This isn’t safe!”//

Refer back a few points ago to how nothing stands out if everything does. This is your 27th dialogue sentence. 23 of them end in an exclamation mark or interrobang. You've pretty much stripped the exclamation mark of commanding any attention for the rest of your story.

>Rainbow Dash wasted no time in strapping the bags around her own back, tucking the straps under her wings.//

Beware of misplaced modifiers, particularly participles. Any sort of modifier tends to latch onto the nearest possible object, so your "tucking the straps…" phrase wants to describe "back." We even have to go back through another possibility, "bags," before we get to the intended "Rainbow Dash."

>As she stepped out of her boots and pushed them to the side, a streak of water following them across the floor, she looked to the side and asked//

While grammatically sound, that absolute phrase is awkwardly placed. It took a couple of readings to sort out the syntax.

>She shook her own body much more thoroughly than Fluttershy had, but her shivering body wouldn’t forgive her so easily.//

Odd to have "body" named as a subject in one clause and an object in the other like this. Might want to rephrase.

>“Th-thanks,” Rainbow said, standing stock still and staring at nothing in particular through squinted eyes. Many little creatures looked at her from around the room, most with worried expressions.//

Your narrator's perspective is pretty nebulous here. It was pretty firmly with Dash in the first scene, but here, it's pretty distant from anyone. You've said Dash isn't staring at anything, and yet the narrator has her seeing these creatures looking back at her. So which is it?

>Her motions were almost mechanical.//

That really places the burden on me to visualize. It's the writer's job to set the scene. Give me more about how this looks.

>Fluttershy suddenly appeared in front of her//

"Suddenly" does have its place, but it's often better to convey the suddenness through the language or the lack of segue to the "sudden" action rather than actually using this word.

>T-tank//

Proper noun. You have to capitalize both.

>Her eyes were big and profound//

"Profound" isn't really a physical quality…

>“Make yourself comfortable,” said Fluttershy, moving towards the kitchen again.//

Note how often you use this sentence structure. "She performed this action, performing this other action." You don't want to create a repetitive feel. Now, the simpler a sentence form is, the more you can get away with it before it gets repetitive. The basic "She performed this action" blends in for longer before it starts calling attention to itself, and tha's really the key: you don't want the writing calling attention to itself.

>Two little rabbits hopped up to it and began eating hurriedly.//

Also watch how often you use -ly adverbs like this. They're pretty weak descriptors, but thank goodness I haven't caught you using them to convey emotions. Yet. Also beware using start/begin as your verb. I've noticed several already. They're obvious, in that any given action will begin. It's only worth using this verb to emphasize the beginning because it's abrupt or the action never finishes.

>I was out of animal feed.//

If being out in the storm was such a big deal, why was the store where she bought this still open?

>a half a dozen//

Lose one of those a's. Doesn't matter which.

>birdfeeder//

bird feeder

>The birds all fluttered to it immediately.//

Well, not all bids eat seeds, and even ones that do eat them prefer different kinds. This might need some clarification.

>Not a big deal?//

When a ! or ? is attached to an italicized word, italicize it as well.

>eyeing her strangely//

Too vague. I have no idea what this looks like, either literally or through some imagery. Describe it.

>with an audible squish//

Again with the sound effects. This is a valid word. Just leave it as such.

>I’ve got some spare winter clothes upstairs.//

And a professional weather pony who knew she might possibly get caught in this didn't take the precaution of having her own with her?

>The world was black and very ferocious-looking.//

How can it be both? I get what you're going for, but you need to say it.

>It was a terrifying scene.//

To whom? Neither pony appears frightened, and I don't want the narrator's opinion.

>knowing I could crash and burn at any second//

That speaks more to a style of flying, not the more generic topic. If any kind of flying were this dangerous, pegasi would be rare.

>to not fly//

not to fly

>She quickly returned to staring blankly at Fluttershy.//

This is the fifth "stare" in the last dozen or so paragraphs. Mix up your word choice some more. You might need to go for more description, as your other main synonyms ("look" and "gaze") are also getting some mileage on them.

>Other ponies feel those things too.//

You had me until now. It makes sense that Dash might have overlooked how Fluttershy feels, but everyone? And when a cutie mark is such a pervasive part of their life? She should understand inherently how they all feel.

>The few animals that remained in the room//

You don't need "in the room," and it's repetitive with the last sentence anyway.

>W-what//

Again, "Wh-what."

>It’s Harriot the bear!//

Wait, how would a badger know that? All the animals are holed up in their individual homes, right? Might need a bit of explanation.

>She resumed her mad rush//

She was described as "cantering to the kitchen." That's not a mad rush.

>with that//

Phrases like this and "at that point" are horribly self-referential things to have in narration, expect for first-person.

>just staring at the door//

Oh, good, we're back to the staring.

>staring up at the nothing on the ceiling//



>her face nonplussed//

"Nonplussed" is more of an attitude than an expression. It's not really something a face can be. A face can express surprise, for instance, but it can't be surprised.

>ever!//

Again, italicize that punctuation.

You use "stare" 10 times. That doesn't sound so bad. It's only about once per page on average. But as is a common problem, you tend to repeat certain words in clusters, and most of these are on just a couple of pages. Same thing with start/begin (14 instances), look (24), just (28). And on to your "to be" verbs. I'm only looking at the most common forms, but we have be (15), been (4), was (21), is (15), were (17), isn't (2), wasn't (1), weren't (1). That's 76, or about one every 3.5 sentences, 1 per paragraph, 10 per page. While it's not necessary or even a good thing to eliminate them altogether (doing so in dialogue can be especially difficult while maintaining a natural tone), it's a good idea to reduce them wherever you can. It's not that hard, if you put a little thought into it. Overuse of "to be" verbs can indicate excessive passive voice (I didn't see any), telly language (I'll get to that in a second), or a need to choose more active verbs (there we go). It's much more interesting to read about what happens than what is. An active verb spices up even mundane things a bit, like the difference between "There he was" and "There he sat."

I like your characterization of Fluttershy. She knows what her talent is and has confidence in it. And Dash's dialogue is well done. Now, you don't really have any conflict here. I can excuse that in the case of showing character development, but you've chosen to have Dash's character grow by finding out something she should already know. You might need to tweak that to give this story some bite. Or you could add in some conflict by having Dash agonize over Fluttershy while she's gone, wonder what's taking her so long, thinking she should have insisted on going along, etc. Just spitballing here, but you get the idea.

I was pleased I didn't catch you using telly language, but part of that seems to be because you didn't delve into their emotions that consistently. There were spots where you had nice body language, dialogue, and word choice to create a vivid picture of how they must look and feel, but there were other places that it felt a bit superficial. Take the last scene, for instance. Fluttershy comes in, and we get a physical description, but nothing she says or does backs up that she must be exhausted. You're leaning on events a bit much, and secondarily, on dialogue, to carry the story, but it takes a bit more nuanced approach to create that emotional attachment.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Quickly shaking the chill from her hooves//</span><br />Canon from &quot;Winter Wrap Up&quot; doesn&#039;t imply that handling snow clouds would do this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Last one!” she said//</span><br />Somewhat repetitive with your first sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>poofed</i>//</span><br />It&#039;s not the best idea to use sound effects as your verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and let her fall into the snowstorm beneath//</span><br />If it&#039;s gone, it&#039;s not there to let her do anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hundreds of snowflakes blew horizontally through the air//</span><br />The number is rather determinate. If she has a good feel for being able to gauge the amount, do something to indicate that; otherwise, it feels disconnected from her situation, since she&#039;d be too distracted to count them. &quot;Through the air&quot; here is redundant/obvious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All of the ice, snow, and wind had rapidly changed the atmosphere from a mild cold to an arctic tundra.//</span><br />Two things: The description is incongruous, as you&#039;re likening the atmosphere to terrain. It&#039;s not a very apt comparison. Second, not that for snow to form, the air has to be cold already; the actual changing of water vapor to snowflakes warms the air up a little.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville sat just a small ways//</span><br />You do see this in common usage, but technically, using &quot;ways&quot; as a singular is incorrect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Horse apples//</span><br />Typically written as one word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at the edge of her periphery//</span><br />Redundant. Periphery <i>is</i> the edge.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What are you doing out here, Fluttershy?! Didn’t you notice the storm?!//</span><br />Okay, you&#039;re overdoing the interrobangs. They&#039;re fine for sparing use, but the more you have, the less effective they become. They make things stand out, and when everything stands out, nothing does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Class-4//</span><br />Write out numbers that short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everyone//</span><br />everpony, perhaps?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;W-what about you?//</span><br />Consider what sounds actually gets repeated when writing a stutter. &quot;Wh-what&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>eep</i></span><br />She actually said it, so lose the italics and put it in quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“This isn’t safe!”//</span><br />Refer back a few points ago to how nothing stands out if everything does. This is your 27th dialogue sentence. 23 of them end in an exclamation mark or interrobang. You&#039;ve pretty much stripped the exclamation mark of commanding any attention for the rest of your story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash wasted no time in strapping the bags around her own back, tucking the straps under her wings.//</span><br />Beware of misplaced modifiers, particularly participles. Any sort of modifier tends to latch onto the nearest possible object, so your &quot;tucking the straps…&quot; phrase wants to describe &quot;back.&quot; We even have to go back through another possibility, &quot;bags,&quot; before we get to the intended &quot;Rainbow Dash.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she stepped out of her boots and pushed them to the side, a streak of water following them across the floor, she looked to the side and asked//</span><br />While grammatically sound, that absolute phrase is awkwardly placed. It took a couple of readings to sort out the syntax.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She shook her own body much more thoroughly than Fluttershy had, but her shivering body wouldn’t forgive her so easily.//</span><br />Odd to have &quot;body&quot; named as a subject in one clause and an object in the other like this. Might want to rephrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Th-thanks,” Rainbow said, standing stock still and staring at nothing in particular through squinted eyes. Many little creatures looked at her from around the room, most with worried expressions.//</span><br />Your narrator&#039;s perspective is pretty nebulous here. It was pretty firmly with Dash in the first scene, but here, it&#039;s pretty distant from anyone. You&#039;ve said Dash isn&#039;t staring at anything, and yet the narrator has her seeing these creatures looking back at her. So which is it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her motions were almost mechanical.//</span><br />That really places the burden on me to visualize. It&#039;s the writer&#039;s job to set the scene. Give me more about how this looks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy suddenly appeared in front of her//</span><br />&quot;Suddenly&quot; does have its place, but it&#039;s often better to convey the suddenness through the language or the lack of segue to the &quot;sudden&quot; action rather than actually using this word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-tank//</span><br />Proper noun. You have to capitalize both.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes were big and profound//</span><br />&quot;Profound&quot; isn&#039;t really a physical quality…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Make yourself comfortable,” said Fluttershy, moving towards the kitchen again.//</span><br />Note how often you use this sentence structure. &quot;She performed this action, performing this other action.&quot; You don&#039;t want to create a repetitive feel. Now, the simpler a sentence form is, the more you can get away with it before it gets repetitive. The basic &quot;She performed this action&quot; blends in for longer before it starts calling attention to itself, and tha&#039;s really the key: you don&#039;t want the writing calling attention to itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Two little rabbits hopped up to it and began eating hurriedly.//</span><br />Also watch how often you use -ly adverbs like this. They&#039;re pretty weak descriptors, but thank goodness I haven&#039;t caught you using them to convey emotions. Yet. Also beware using start/begin as your verb. I&#039;ve noticed several already. They&#039;re obvious, in that any given action will begin. It&#039;s only worth using this verb to emphasize the beginning because it&#039;s abrupt or the action never finishes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was out of animal feed.//</span><br />If being out in the storm was such a big deal, why was the store where she bought this still open?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a half a dozen//</span><br />Lose one of those a&#039;s. Doesn&#039;t matter which.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;birdfeeder//</span><br />bird feeder<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The birds all fluttered to it immediately.//</span><br />Well, not all bids eat seeds, and even ones that do eat them prefer different kinds. This might need some clarification.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Not a big deal</i>?//</span><br />When a ! or ? is attached to an italicized word, italicize it as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyeing her strangely//</span><br />Too vague. I have no idea what this looks like, either literally or through some imagery. Describe it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with an audible <i>squish</i>//</span><br />Again with the sound effects. This is a valid word. Just leave it as such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve got some spare winter clothes upstairs.//</span><br />And a professional weather pony who knew she might possibly get caught in this didn&#039;t take the precaution of having her own with her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The world was black and very ferocious-looking.//</span><br />How can it be both? I get what you&#039;re going for, but you need to say it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a terrifying scene.//</span><br />To whom? Neither pony appears frightened, and I don&#039;t want the narrator&#039;s opinion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knowing I could crash and burn at any second//</span><br />That speaks more to a style of flying, not the more generic topic. If any kind of flying were this dangerous, pegasi would be rare.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not fly//</span><br />not to fly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She quickly returned to staring blankly at Fluttershy.//</span><br />This is the fifth &quot;stare&quot; in the last dozen or so paragraphs. Mix up your word choice some more. You might need to go for more description, as your other main synonyms (&quot;look&quot; and &quot;gaze&quot;) are also getting some mileage on them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Other ponies feel those things too.//</span><br />You had me until now. It makes sense that Dash might have overlooked how Fluttershy feels, but everyone? And when a cutie mark is such a pervasive part of their life? She should understand inherently how they all feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The few animals that remained in the room//</span><br />You don&#039;t need &quot;in the room,&quot; and it&#039;s repetitive with the last sentence anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;W-what//</span><br />Again, &quot;Wh-what.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s Harriot the bear!//</span><br />Wait, how would a badger know that? All the animals are holed up in their individual homes, right? Might need a bit of explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She resumed her mad rush//</span><br />She was described as &quot;cantering to the kitchen.&quot; That&#039;s not a mad rush.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with that//</span><br />Phrases like this and &quot;at that point&quot; are horribly self-referential things to have in narration, expect for first-person.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just staring at the door//</span><br />Oh, good, we&#039;re back to the staring.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;staring up at the nothing on the ceiling//</span><br />…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her face nonplussed//</span><br />&quot;Nonplussed&quot; is more of an attitude than an expression. It&#039;s not really something a face can be. A face can express surprise, for instance, but it can&#039;t <i>be</i> surprised.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>ever</i>!//</span><br />Again, italicize that punctuation.<br /><br />You use &quot;stare&quot; 10 times. That doesn&#039;t sound so bad. It&#039;s only about once per page on average. But as is a common problem, you tend to repeat certain words in clusters, and most of these are on just a couple of pages. Same thing with start/begin (14 instances), look (24), just (28). And on to your &quot;to be&quot; verbs. I&#039;m only looking at the most common forms, but we have be (15), been (4), was (21), is (15), were (17), isn&#039;t (2), wasn&#039;t (1), weren&#039;t (1). That&#039;s 76, or about one every 3.5 sentences, 1 per paragraph, 10 per page. While it&#039;s not necessary or even a good thing to eliminate them altogether (doing so in dialogue can be especially difficult while maintaining a natural tone), it&#039;s a good idea to reduce them wherever you can. It&#039;s not that hard, if you put a little thought into it. Overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs can indicate excessive passive voice (I didn&#039;t see any), telly language (I&#039;ll get to that in a second), or a need to choose more active verbs (there we go). It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens than what is. An active verb spices up even mundane things a bit, like the difference between &quot;There he was&quot; and &quot;There he sat.&quot;<br /><br />I like your characterization of Fluttershy. She knows what her talent is and has confidence in it. And Dash&#039;s dialogue is well done. Now, you don&#039;t really have any conflict here. I can excuse that in the case of showing character development, but you&#039;ve chosen to have Dash&#039;s character grow by finding out something she should already know. You might need to tweak that to give this story some bite. Or you could add in some conflict by having Dash agonize over Fluttershy while she&#039;s gone, wonder what&#039;s taking her so long, thinking she should have insisted on going along, etc. Just spitballing here, but you get the idea.<br /><br />I was pleased I didn&#039;t catch you using telly language, but part of that seems to be because you didn&#039;t delve into their emotions that consistently. There were spots where you had nice body language, dialogue, and word choice to create a vivid picture of how they must look and feel, but there were other places that it felt a bit superficial. Take the last scene, for instance. Fluttershy comes in, and we get a physical description, but nothing she says or does backs up that she must be exhausted. You&#039;re leaning on events a bit much, and secondarily, on dialogue, to carry the story, but it takes a bit more nuanced approach to create that emotional attachment.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 32

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Roma bucked a beige hind leg at one of the poles holding up the awning of her market stall but her hoof just scraped at the wood.//

Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. And a minor thing: it's kind of forced to work in her color this way. For one, we start in a moment of high emotion, and her color doesn't seem to be the kind of thing that would stand out to someone watching, so it interrupts the action. Insofar as the narrator seems to be in Roma's perspective anyway, this doesn't seem like the kind of information she'd find important. And for another thing, you're naturally throwing a lot of information at the reader this early in the story, so it's best to keep this to what's pertinent for now. Does it matter what color she is? probably not. IMO, if it's never important, it's not worth mentioning at all, but I'll grant that many readers in this fandom like such descriptions, so at least find a less obtrusive place to work it in.

>With a snort//

This is your ninth sentence, and we finally get one that doesn't start with the subject. Try to mix up your openers a bit more. Not too much, but a little helps keep it from feeling repetitive. I've looked ahead, and this is somewhat of an issue throughout the story. Also be careful how you mix it up, as many authors quickly run into overuse of "as" clauses and "he did this, doing that" structures.

>tomato dotted//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>—ack!” The cap dropped to the ground again as a loud knocking came from the counter behind her.//

This is all out of sorts. She reacts to the knocking before it happens. It's important for the sequencing of events to make sense, or it subconsciously doesn't add up.

>What has gotten in to you?//

Usually, that's "into" as one word.

>Rainy gulped as her wide eyes drifted between the counter, the broken pole, and Roma.//

You've actually got a good bit of action interspersed with the dialogue here. This is a good way to add realism and remind us that the conversants aren't just disembodied floating heads. The only thing I'll say is that this is the first one of these actions that gives us information about the characters' emotions. Try to work a bit more of that in. And kudos for getting at the emotion indirectly instead of outright naming how they feel. This is the correct way to handle "show-versus-tell."

>or something. Does Aura have a card or something//

Watch for word or phrase repetition where it's not being done for some deliberate effect.

>Berry Pinch//

Did you mean Berry Punch? Or is this an OC?

>I’m just tryin’ ta be civil, Roma. Somethin’ ya seem to be losin’ yer grip on today.//

A little accent goes a long way. You don't want imitative spellings to slow the reader down at all. By clipping the g's off those verbs, you've already created an informal voice, and I guarantee you readers will already hear the "to" and "your" in their heads as you've already spelled them. I'd recommend toning this back a bit.

>Crafty Crate trotted past Roma, stepping carefully around the strewn papers and tomatoes.//

Watch for misplaced modifiers. Participles are especially notorious for this. Modifiers like to latch onto the nearest possible object in most cases. Here, proximity suggests it's Roma who's "stepping carefully." In many cases, the reader can just apply a bit of logic to figure out what you meant, but in this case, it truly is ambiguous. I suspect it's Crate doing the stepping, but I can't tell.

>I was tellin’ Raindrops, here,” he nodded towards the pegasus mare, “about how Pinkie//

That's not how to work an aside into a quote. Here are your options:
I was tellin’ Raindrops, here—” he nodded towards the pegasus mare “—about how Pinkie
if he actually stops speaking to nod, or:
I was tellin’ Raindrops, here”—he nodded towards the pegasus mare—“about how Pinkie
if the speech is continuous.

>Nearby a couple of ponies//

While it's not unusual to go without commas for introductory elements like this in British usage, it feels like you're going for a preposition sense here, which substantially changes the meaning.

>Sorry sirs//

Missing comma for direct address.

>Behind the three Raindrops looked up from the gathered papers.//

Here's another introductory element that's kind of misleading without a comma. It makes it sound like there are three Raindrops there.

>—gack!” Rainy looked up to see Roma pouncing at her//

Again, you've got the reaction before the cause.

>Beige legs and a panicked expression//

See, here's the place to work in her color. You could probably delete the first one. But why just her legs? Isn't she a solid color?

>A few moved to start gathering them back up again while others began to whisper back and forth.//

I've noticed a number of these "start" and "begin" verbs. They're often overused by inexperienced authors. It's obvious that any given action would begin. It's best to reserve these words for times when a beginning is noteworthy because it's abrupt or because the action gets interrupted, fails, etc.

>Roma pushed herself off of Raindrops and looked around in horror.//

Have a look at the show versus tell section at the top of this thread. You seem to be doing fine on that front, but I want you to see how this "in horror" is completely redundant with the description in the following sentence, which does a far better job of connecting me with the character, since I have to interpret her actions to infer what her emotions are.

>One of the ponies helping gasped and pulled one of the pages//

Repetitive phrasing.

>looked around at the others with a look of disgust.//

Repetitive use of "look," and telly "of disgust." Show me how he looks, what he does, and let me figure out he's disgusted.

>Some turned faces filled with concern and shame at one another while others simply shrugged.//

As I say in the aforementioned description, it's not always necessary to show. For these ponies in the crowd that we will probably never see again, it's not crucial to show with them, but you're pushing it by piling up the "concern and shame."

>When she didn’t turn//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>Rainy’s expression hardened with rage.//

Yeah, ease off those prepositional emotions.

>she had left it in the counter//

Usually "on" a counter. If it's inside, it's not really the counter anymore—more like a cabinet or shelf.

>to not push//

not to push

>but her and Rarity had tried to lighten her mood some//

That first "her" should be a "she."

>a soft thud//

Sound effects are discouraged in narration, but as this is a valid word anyway, just remove the italics.

>Gummy crawled out from underneath an end table holding a pink balloon in his jaws//

Another misplaced modifier. It sounds like the end table is holding a balloon.

>By Celestia they won’t take her.//

Missing comma for the invective.

>I’ve got some stamps in my saddlebag, let me get those and how about you mail the card to her?//

Comma splice.

>The sun had yet to raise fully//

Rise. "Raise" requires a direct object.

>I sure am glad you think so, sweetie, we may be eating them for a while.//

Another comma splice.

All told, a rather nice story. You only make a few consistent errors, and those are easy ones to fix. I do have two comments on how the story unfolds, however.

Roma's reaction to the "sorry" balloon was so muted and went by so fast that it's not at all clear that she reasoned out what it was. She's pretty matter-of-fact about something that sould be a pretty big emotional moment for her.

Second, it's odd that advertising would be such an alien concept to them. As much as their world is like ours, I'd err on the side of something that timeless existing there, unless canon has specifically said it isn't. Even in your case, the ponies aren't reacting to the cards as if they're some wonderful, newfangled thing. Perhaps it's akin more to a celebrity endorsement, except that there was no indication the cards were identifiable as coming from Pinkie. Maybe something to think about.

In addition, take a look through your use of "to be" verbs. You actually didn't have all that many. Over the few most common forms, I only counted about 40, or maybe one per page. But there were a few spots that you used them in clusters, so just watch that. I'll spare you the full speech, since you seemed to avoid them pretty well, an so must know something about keeping them in check.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Roma bucked a beige hind leg at one of the poles holding up the awning of her market stall but her hoof just scraped at the wood.//</span><br />Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. And a minor thing: it&#039;s kind of forced to work in her color this way. For one, we start in a moment of high emotion, and her color doesn&#039;t seem to be the kind of thing that would stand out to someone watching, so it interrupts the action. Insofar as the narrator seems to be in Roma&#039;s perspective anyway, this doesn&#039;t seem like the kind of information she&#039;d find important. And for another thing, you&#039;re naturally throwing a lot of information at the reader this early in the story, so it&#039;s best to keep this to what&#039;s pertinent for now. Does it matter what color she is? probably not. IMO, if it&#039;s never important, it&#039;s not worth mentioning at all, but I&#039;ll grant that many readers in this fandom like such descriptions, so at least find a less obtrusive place to work it in.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With a snort//</span><br />This is your ninth sentence, and we finally get one that doesn&#039;t start with the subject. Try to mix up your openers a bit more. Not too much, but a little helps keep it from feeling repetitive. I&#039;ve looked ahead, and this is somewhat of an issue throughout the story. Also be careful <i>how</i> you mix it up, as many authors quickly run into overuse of &quot;as&quot; clauses and &quot;he did this, doing that&quot; structures.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tomato dotted//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;—ack!” The cap dropped to the ground again as a loud knocking came from the counter behind her.//</span><br />This is all out of sorts. She reacts to the knocking before it happens. It&#039;s important for the sequencing of events to make sense, or it subconsciously doesn&#039;t add up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What has gotten <i>in</i> to you?//</span><br />Usually, that&#039;s &quot;into&quot; as one word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainy gulped as her wide eyes drifted between the counter, the broken pole, and Roma.//</span><br />You&#039;ve actually got a good bit of action interspersed with the dialogue here. This is a good way to add realism and remind us that the conversants aren&#039;t just disembodied floating heads. The only thing I&#039;ll say is that this is the first one of these actions that gives us information about the characters&#039; emotions. Try to work a bit more of that in. And kudos for getting at the emotion indirectly instead of outright naming how they feel. This is the correct way to handle &quot;show-versus-tell.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or something. Does Aura have a card or something//</span><br />Watch for word or phrase repetition where it&#039;s not being done for some deliberate effect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berry Pinch//</span><br />Did you mean Berry Punch? Or is this an OC?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m just tryin’ ta be civil, Roma. Somethin’ ya seem to be losin’ yer grip on today.//</span><br />A little accent goes a long way. You don&#039;t want imitative spellings to slow the reader down at all. By clipping the g&#039;s off those verbs, you&#039;ve already created an informal voice, and I guarantee you readers will already hear the &quot;to&quot; and &quot;your&quot; in their heads as you&#039;ve already spelled them. I&#039;d recommend toning this back a bit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Crafty Crate trotted past Roma, stepping carefully around the strewn papers and tomatoes.//</span><br />Watch for misplaced modifiers. Participles are especially notorious for this. Modifiers like to latch onto the nearest possible object in most cases. Here, proximity suggests it&#039;s Roma who&#039;s &quot;stepping carefully.&quot; In many cases, the reader can just apply a bit of logic to figure out what you meant, but in this case, it truly is ambiguous. I suspect it&#039;s Crate doing the stepping, but I can&#039;t tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was tellin’ Raindrops, here,” he nodded towards the pegasus mare, “about how Pinkie//</span><br />That&#039;s not how to work an aside into a quote. Here are your options:<br />I was tellin’ Raindrops, here—” he nodded towards the pegasus mare “—about how Pinkie<br />if he actually stops speaking to nod, or:<br />I was tellin’ Raindrops, here”—he nodded towards the pegasus mare—“about how Pinkie<br />if the speech is continuous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nearby a couple of ponies//</span><br />While it&#039;s not unusual to go without commas for introductory elements like this in British usage, it feels like you&#039;re going for a preposition sense here, which substantially changes the meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sorry sirs//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Behind the three Raindrops looked up from the gathered papers.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another introductory element that&#039;s kind of misleading without a comma. It makes it sound like there are three Raindrops there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;—gack!” Rainy looked up to see Roma pouncing at her//</span><br />Again, you&#039;ve got the reaction before the cause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Beige legs and a panicked expression//</span><br />See, here&#039;s the place to work in her color. You could probably delete the first one. But why just her legs? Isn&#039;t she a solid color?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A few moved to start gathering them back up again while others began to whisper back and forth.//</span><br />I&#039;ve noticed a number of these &quot;start&quot; and &quot;begin&quot; verbs. They&#039;re often overused by inexperienced authors. It&#039;s obvious that any given action would begin. It&#039;s best to reserve these words for times when a beginning is noteworthy because it&#039;s abrupt or because the action gets interrupted, fails, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Roma pushed herself off of Raindrops and looked around in horror.//</span><br />Have a look at the show versus tell section at the top of this thread. You seem to be doing fine on that front, but I want you to see how this &quot;in horror&quot; is completely redundant with the description in the following sentence, which does a far better job of connecting me with the character, since I have to interpret her actions to infer what her emotions are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One of the ponies helping gasped and pulled one of the pages//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked around at the others with a look of disgust.//</span><br />Repetitive use of &quot;look,&quot; and telly &quot;of disgust.&quot; Show me how he looks, what he does, and let me figure out he&#039;s disgusted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Some turned faces filled with concern and shame at one another while others simply shrugged.//</span><br />As I say in the aforementioned description, it&#039;s not always necessary to show. For these ponies in the crowd that we will probably never see again, it&#039;s not crucial to show with them, but you&#039;re pushing it by piling up the &quot;concern and shame.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When she didn’t turn//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainy’s expression hardened with rage.//</span><br />Yeah, ease off those prepositional emotions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she had left it in the counter//</span><br />Usually &quot;on&quot; a counter. If it&#039;s inside, it&#039;s not really the counter anymore—more like a cabinet or shelf.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not push//</span><br />not to push<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but her and Rarity had tried to lighten her mood some//</span><br />That first &quot;her&quot; should be a &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a soft <i>thud</i>//</span><br />Sound effects are discouraged in narration, but as this is a valid word anyway, just remove the italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gummy crawled out from underneath an end table holding a pink balloon in his jaws//</span><br />Another misplaced modifier. It sounds like the end table is holding a balloon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>By Celestia they won’t take her.</i>//</span><br />Missing comma for the invective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve got some stamps in my saddlebag, let me get those and how about you mail the card to her?//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sun had yet to raise fully//</span><br />Rise. &quot;Raise&quot; requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I sure am glad you think so, sweetie, we may be eating them for a while.//</span><br />Another comma splice.<br /><br />All told, a rather nice story. You only make a few consistent errors, and those are easy ones to fix. I do have two comments on how the story unfolds, however.<br /><br />Roma&#039;s reaction to the &quot;sorry&quot; balloon was so muted and went by so fast that it&#039;s not at all clear that she reasoned out what it was. She&#039;s pretty matter-of-fact about something that sould be a pretty big emotional moment for her.<br /><br />Second, it&#039;s odd that advertising would be such an alien concept to them. As much as their world is like ours, I&#039;d err on the side of something that timeless existing there, unless canon has specifically said it isn&#039;t. Even in your case, the ponies aren&#039;t reacting to the cards as if they&#039;re some wonderful, newfangled thing. Perhaps it&#039;s akin more to a celebrity endorsement, except that there was no indication the cards were identifiable as coming from Pinkie. Maybe something to think about.<br /><br />In addition, take a look through your use of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You actually didn&#039;t have all that many. Over the few most common forms, I only counted about 40, or maybe one per page. But there were a few spots that you used them in clusters, so just watch that. I&#039;ll spare you the full speech, since you seemed to avoid them pretty well, an so must know something about keeping them in check.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 33

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>One thousand years.

>
>A long time for nearly anyone, except a select few, and one of those few was currently sitting in her favorite chair awaiting a visitor.//
The first sentence takes an almost personal voice, and then the second immediately pushes back out to an external viewpoint. You should decide whether you want a more objective or subjective narrator, then keep a fairly consistent voice, unless you want to do the occasional shift between characters.

>as kind as they could be given everything that had happened//

Missing a comma for the participle.

>she would have been ecstatic to find that she would//

Watch repetitive phrasings. There's probably a better way to word this.

>through a millennia//

The singular is "millennium."

>, she believed his name was Locked Tight,//

This can't quite be inserted in this way since it's an independent clause, and it's structured as an aside anyway, so it'd work better with dashes.

>…quite the echo though.//

A leading ellipsis is for times when a speaker is picking up an earlier dropped thought or is just becoming audible. It doesn't really work here. And capitalize.

>draconiquus//

I think canon spelling is "draconequus."

>Thank you for bringing him, that will be all.//

Comma splice.

>the strange creature he’d escorted//

This smacks of skipping into Lock's perspective for a moment. He's the only one there who would consider Discord strange. See previous comment about keeping a steady perspective.

>(on the ceiling, of course)//

Parentheticals rarely work in narration, and even more than the first time, this is striking an abnormally conversational tone as compared to the bulk of the narration.

>what looked suspiciously like a diary//

And now you're in Discord's head. You ought to pay attention to what information your perspective character would have access to. If you're with Celestia, you can have her interpret this based on how Discord acts and what he says, but you have to give me that evidence. She wouldn't know this explicitly.

>Celestia had looked at him in the most unbelievably tired and care worn way she had ever done in the entirety of his knowledge of her//

Careworn. And I can't believe that she would ever have looked at him that way until quite recently. The sentence ends with some awkward phrasing as well.

>I am old, Discord; frightfully old.//

A properly used semicolon would have independent clauses somewhere on both sides.

>Celestia melancholy//

Seems like you're missing a comma, but I'd also discourage you from bluntly informing me of her emotion like this.

>It opened easily and she pointed to a bright cluster of stars.//

When you start a new clause (separate subject with its own verb), you usually need to use a comma.

>“Your parents are a couple of gas giants that send light through the deep reaches of space to make tiny dots in the sky?”//

I'm kind of getting mood whiplash from him. He's oddly bland and formal at times, which isn't like him. And then we get these playful lines, but they aren't backed up with any context. He wouldn't just deadpan everything, for instance. You're relying on the dialogue alone to carry his attitude.

>Chaos and order must remain in balance, if either dominates then life is doomed.//

Comma splice and a missing comma between clauses.

>Discord raised a skeptical eyebrow.//

You're directly telling me emotions again, and this one is superfluous, as the raised eyebrow already conveys skepticism. Read the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread.

>I’m just surprised you knew.//

Perhaps an emphasis on "you"?

>feigned death in the air//

I have no idea how this would look. Describe it to me. Otherwise, it's empty words.

>as you well know//

And this is really the point, isn't it? Discord already knows all of this, so it's being said purely for the reader's benefit. There are other ways of working it in gradually without resorting to an infodump.

>And, Sombra was last, and even then//

You don't need the first comma, and using the multiple "and"s creates a repetitive feel.

>reform//

I'd question this word choice, as the most common definition is quite opposite of what you want.

>It was a little irksome hearing that the pony who’d locked you up in stone a little while ago had spent your entire sentence looking for the folks who could put you right back in.//

It's best not to address the reader like this, and we have some narrative dissonance again.

>Discord sat with his elbow resting on his head, his chin resting on his knee.//

That's rather… contorted. Did you mean for this to be comical?

>And, a small mountain of presents filled a corner of the hall near the thrones.//

It's fairly rare for a comma after a conjunction to be correct. This one isn't.

>For Luna, it would be the greatest of delights to have so many give her so much deserved affection and attention.//

This is a really overlooked part of the story. Celestia obviously cares a lot for her sister, but this strong emotion and the lengths to which she'd go to create a special event for her barely get a sentence's mention.

>I don’t think I could have done a better job myself.”

>
>Celestia allowed Twilight a few moments to bask in the glow of her job well done//
"Done a better job" and "job well done" is fairly repetitive phrasing.

>very awed and timid looking//

Describe that look. Don't just tell me what it is.

>With a small giggle and a deep breath for courage//

Twilight accepts this huge responsibility very quickly and without much wrestling it over in her mind. It's not enough to ask whether an action would be reasonable for a character. An author must also show that the means and motivation also make sense, and by glossing over all that, two things happen: there isn't much emotional investment in what happens and it begins to feel like plot convenience rather than a natural flow of events.

>spell-//

Use a proper dash for cutoffs.

>the trails left by the tears still shined out//

"Shined" takes a direct object. It's what you do to shoes or brass. You want "shone."

>With that//

You have a lot of these introductory elements that don't have a comma to set them off. While it's not mandatory, particularly in British usage, it sometimes is a good idea for disambiguation. While that's not the case here, the choice of your introductory phrase is. Ones like this and "at that point" refer directly to the narration ad are immersion-breaking. They starkly remind the reader that he's reading text and not experiencing it.

Comma usage is the only predominant mechanical thing I'd point out. Really, it's more that while the premise is fine (frankly, just about any premise can be done well), it's treated rather superficially. Part of this is show-versus-tell. Many emotions are presented to me at face value instead of making me interpret them, but there are also many places where you don't delve into the characters' feelings at all. I pointed out a few; Luna's decision to follow her sister and Twilight's reactions to… well, everything also come to mind.

Another common problem is overuse of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring—it's much more interesting to read about what happens that what merely is. Of the simpler forms, I counted 33 in chapter 2 and 63 in chapter 1. While it's not necessary to eliminate them altogether, this is a pretty high count for this length of story. They can indicate too much passive voice (I didn't see any), telly language (some), and a need to choose more active verbs (definitely).

Lastly, the narrative voice flits around into multiple perspectives. It would do well to adopt a more consistent mood and stay with one character, where feasible (clearly, staying with Celestia isn't an option once she's gone). Discord also comes across as odd. His playful voice is largely absent, and when it does appear, it's sudden. Not that you can't get there from canon, but you have to connect the dots a little better. It's not enough just to say that things have changed over time. This gets back to making character motivations feel realistic.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One thousand years.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A long time for nearly anyone, except a select few, and one of those few was currently sitting in her favorite chair awaiting a visitor.//</span><br />The first sentence takes an almost personal voice, and then the second immediately pushes back out to an external viewpoint. You should decide whether you want a more objective or subjective narrator, then keep a fairly consistent voice, unless you want to do the occasional shift between characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as kind as they could be given everything that had happened//</span><br />Missing a comma for the participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she would have been ecstatic to find that she would//</span><br />Watch repetitive phrasings. There&#039;s probably a better way to word this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;through a millennia//</span><br />The singular is &quot;millennium.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;, she believed his name was Locked Tight,//</span><br />This can&#039;t quite be inserted in this way since it&#039;s an independent clause, and it&#039;s structured as an aside anyway, so it&#039;d work better with dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…quite the echo though.//</span><br />A leading ellipsis is for times when a speaker is picking up an earlier dropped thought or is just becoming audible. It doesn&#039;t really work here. And capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;draconiquus//</span><br />I think canon spelling is &quot;draconequus.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thank you for bringing him, that will be all.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the strange creature he’d escorted//</span><br />This smacks of skipping into Lock&#039;s perspective for a moment. He&#039;s the only one there who would consider Discord strange. See previous comment about keeping a steady perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(on the ceiling, of course)//</span><br />Parentheticals rarely work in narration, and even more than the first time, this is striking an abnormally conversational tone as compared to the bulk of the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;what looked suspiciously like a diary//</span><br />And now you&#039;re in Discord&#039;s head. You ought to pay attention to what information your perspective character would have access to. If you&#039;re with Celestia, you can have her interpret this based on how Discord acts and what he says, but you have to give me that evidence. She wouldn&#039;t know this explicitly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia had looked at him in the most unbelievably tired and care worn way she had ever done in the entirety of his knowledge of her//</span><br />Careworn. And I can&#039;t believe that she would ever have looked at him that way until quite recently. The sentence ends with some awkward phrasing as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am old, Discord; frightfully old.//</span><br />A properly used semicolon would have independent clauses somewhere on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia melancholy//</span><br />Seems like you&#039;re missing a comma, but I&#039;d also discourage you from bluntly informing me of her emotion like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It opened easily and she pointed to a bright cluster of stars.//</span><br />When you start a new clause (separate subject with its own verb), you usually need to use a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Your parents are a couple of gas giants that send light through the deep reaches of space to make tiny dots in the sky?”//</span><br />I&#039;m kind of getting mood whiplash from him. He&#039;s oddly bland and formal at times, which isn&#039;t like him. And then we get these playful lines, but they aren&#039;t backed up with any context. He wouldn&#039;t just deadpan everything, for instance. You&#039;re relying on the dialogue alone to carry his attitude.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chaos and order must remain in balance, if either dominates then life is doomed.//</span><br />Comma splice and a missing comma between clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discord raised a skeptical eyebrow.//</span><br />You&#039;re directly telling me emotions again, and this one is superfluous, as the raised eyebrow already conveys skepticism. Read the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m just surprised you knew.//</span><br />Perhaps an emphasis on &quot;you&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;feigned death in the air//</span><br />I have no idea how this would look. Describe it to me. Otherwise, it&#039;s empty words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as you well know//</span><br />And this is really the point, isn&#039;t it? Discord already knows all of this, so it&#039;s being said purely for the reader&#039;s benefit. There are other ways of working it in gradually without resorting to an infodump.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And, Sombra was last, and even then//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the first comma, and using the multiple &quot;and&quot;s creates a repetitive feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reform//</span><br />I&#039;d question this word choice, as the most common definition is quite opposite of what you want.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a little irksome hearing that the pony who’d locked you up in stone a little while ago had spent your entire sentence looking for the folks who could put you right back in.//</span><br />It&#039;s best not to address the reader like this, and we have some narrative dissonance again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discord sat with his elbow resting on his head, his chin resting on his knee.//</span><br />That&#039;s rather… contorted. Did you mean for this to be comical?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And, a small mountain of presents filled a corner of the hall near the thrones.//</span><br />It&#039;s fairly rare for a comma after a conjunction to be correct. This one isn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For Luna, it would be the greatest of delights to have so many give her so much deserved affection and attention.//</span><br />This is a really overlooked part of the story. Celestia obviously cares a lot for her sister, but this strong emotion and the lengths to which she&#039;d go to create a special event for her barely get a sentence&#039;s mention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t think I could have done a better job myself.”</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia allowed Twilight a few moments to bask in the glow of her job well done//</span><br />&quot;Done a better job&quot; and &quot;job well done&quot; is fairly repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;very awed and timid looking//</span><br />Describe that look. Don&#039;t just tell me what it is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With a small giggle and a deep breath for courage//</span><br />Twilight accepts this huge responsibility very quickly and without much wrestling it over in her mind. It&#039;s not enough to ask whether an action would be reasonable for a character. An author must also show that the means and motivation also make sense, and by glossing over all that, two things happen: there isn&#039;t much emotional investment in what happens and it begins to feel like plot convenience rather than a natural flow of events.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spell-//</span><br />Use a proper dash for cutoffs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the trails left by the tears still shined out//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; takes a direct object. It&#039;s what you do to shoes or brass. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that//</span><br />You have a lot of these introductory elements that don&#039;t have a comma to set them off. While it&#039;s not mandatory, particularly in British usage, it sometimes is a good idea for disambiguation. While that&#039;s not the case here, the choice of your introductory phrase is. Ones like this and &quot;at that point&quot; refer directly to the narration ad are immersion-breaking. They starkly remind the reader that he&#039;s reading text and not experiencing it.<br /><br />Comma usage is the only predominant mechanical thing I&#039;d point out. Really, it&#039;s more that while the premise is fine (frankly, just about any premise can be done well), it&#039;s treated rather superficially. Part of this is show-versus-tell. Many emotions are presented to me at face value instead of making me interpret them, but there are also many places where you don&#039;t delve into the characters&#039; feelings at all. I pointed out a few; Luna&#039;s decision to follow her sister and Twilight&#039;s reactions to… well, everything also come to mind.<br /><br />Another common problem is overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring—it&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens that what merely is. Of the simpler forms, I counted 33 in chapter 2 and 63 in chapter 1. While it&#039;s not necessary to eliminate them altogether, this is a pretty high count for this length of story. They can indicate too much passive voice (I didn&#039;t see any), telly language (some), and a need to choose more active verbs (definitely).<br /><br />Lastly, the narrative voice flits around into multiple perspectives. It would do well to adopt a more consistent mood and stay with one character, where feasible (clearly, staying with Celestia isn&#039;t an option once she&#039;s gone). Discord also comes across as odd. His playful voice is largely absent, and when it does appear, it&#039;s sudden. Not that you can&#039;t get there from canon, but you have to connect the dots a little better. It&#039;s not enough just to say that things have changed over time. This gets back to making character motivations feel realistic.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 34

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Foals happily ran about as the constant ringing of the bell announced the end of school.//

Three problems already. First, the bell doesn't ring that long. I'd hardly characterize it as "constant." And gviven that, "as" clauses imply concurrent action. They wouldn't run around until after it rang, not somehow be synchronized with it. And third, we have telly language, which is a bad thing to do right off the bat when you're trying to hook the reader. Read the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>Of all the days for Silver Spoon to get sick, why must it be today? And I don’t even have those blank flanks around to make fun of!

This is a common issue: characters speaking to themselves in an overly formal manner and solely for the purpose of giving exposition. You have to make this type of thing feel natural, but it's forced here.

>Diamond walked away from the schoolhouse, taking the dusty road in front of it//

Note that participles are prime candidates for misplaced modifiers. This one's not bad, as we can apply a bit of logic to sort it out, but if you don't pay attention, you'll eventually say something ambiguous or outright misleading. Participles ike to latch onto the nearest available object, so it sounds like the schoolhouse is taking the road.

>The warm rays of the sun and the soft chirps of the birds//

This type of indirect possession is often clunky and unwarranted. If there's some thematic or stylistic reason you want to put special focus on the rays or the chirps, fine, but I don't see any here. "The sun's warm rays and the birds' soft chirping" is more concise and direct.

>Diamond’s line of thought was abruptly lost//

Passive voice is a more prevalent but similar issue. If there's a reason you need to draw attention to the "line of thought" far more so than Diamond, fine, but there's no need here. Passive voice is an inherently boring structure; it really only works when you need it's ability to divert attention.

>Diamond changed her course, and walked over the grassy field towards the mysterious silhouette.//

See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>(that probably appeared because of the tempest that plagued Ponyville last night),//

Parentheticals strike a much more conversational tone than your narrator is using. They don't really fit with an objective viewpoint. And the way you've structured that sentence, you shouldn't use the comma.

>his yellow coat with a brown color for a brief moment, before most of the brown liquid flowed back into the pool//

I'm getting color overload here, given that you already mentioned Snails's two colors, and your use of "coat" is immediately misleading in this context. Plus, the double use of "brown" is repetitive.

>She knew that Snails was a bit strange - but to play//

Please use a proper dash.

>as if he was a pig//

When speaking hypothetically like this, please use subjunctive mood = "as if he were"

>It’s really fun, it’s like playing in a pool and in the sand at the same time.//

Comma splice.

>Snails’//

While it's common to see this, the proper possessive is still to put the full apostrophe-s on for singular words, even when they already end in "s."

>Only a slow and dumb pony like yourself could think that such thing would be fu-//

Missing a word. And once again, please use a proper dash.

>At that moment a big blob of mud hit her right in the face, spreading the mud through most of her fur and making her tiara fall on the grass.//

Repetition of "mud," which exposes a bigger problem. You have another bad participle here, and this time, it's a dangling one: whatever it modifies never appears in the sentence. The only options for what is "spreading the mud" are "face" (somehow, I doubt her face is spreading mud) and "blob of mud" (it spreads itself?)

>the source of the laughter: a certain unicorn that was rolling around in laughter//

So, the source of laughter is laughter? I see…

>“It. Is. On…” Diamond said with a intense stare.//

Typo. And why is DT doing Rarity's schtick?

>How dare you dirty me and my tiara!?//

That's not normally posed as any sort of question. You can just go with the exclamation mark.

>The response was Snails popping his head out from the mud and sputtering mud on her face with his mouth.//

Yet more repetition of "mud." You're in the middle of a stretch where you use the word 15 times in 13 paragraphs!

>With incredible agility, Snails, still inside the mud, moved from the spot where he was to a few feet behind Diamond Tiara, who was looking around for him.

So, she's on top of him, and then somehow loses track of where he is? I'm not buying it.

>Using his horn//

You'll normally set off participles with a comma.

>With incredible reflexes//

You do this in several places. It's unclear which perspective your narrator has adopted. So when he goes on to make a judgment like "incredible," whose opinion is that? I don't mind hearing a character's opinion, but if the narrator isn't speaking for one of them, I don't care what he thinks.

>And the feelings of disdain and anger that Diamond Tiara had became feelings of joy that caused her to smile like she never smiled before.//

Yeah, this is majorly telly language. Get me to figure out what she feels. Don't just tell me.

>The Sun//

Why is that capitalized?

>The memory sparked an idea within her mind. She got up from the grass and walked towards Snails. Noticing this, he rolled on his stomach and looked at her.//

See, now you do adopt a perspective. Somewhat. But it's jerking back and forth between them. Within the same paragraph. Only she could know that an idea had sparked in her mind, and only he could know that he noticed it, unless you narrate how one of them perceived those things about the other by reading thei body language, for example.

>eyes that shined like two jewels//

"Shined" takes a direct object. It's what you do to shoes and brass. You want "shone."

>“Wha- what is it?” he managed to stutter//

When you've already spelled out the stutter, you don't need to mention it again.

>“You’re in,”//

Given what happens after this, I think you meant to say "it."

>following behind//

Redundant

>a unexpected turn//

Typo. Really, most word processors will catch this type of mistake.

>In a flash, an idea appeared on Snails’ mind, an idea that turned his happy grin into a wicked smile.//

"in Snails's mind." And he just got the idea that "Hey, I can actually catch her! Good thing I remembered!" That's awfully contrived.

>And…” Diamond shuffled closer to Snails’ side, causing her pink fur to mix with his yellow fur, “you can call me Dia if you want.”//

Tossing an aside into a quote is done like this:
And—” Diamond shuffled closer to Snails’ side, causing her pink fur to mix with his yellow fur “—you can call me Dia if you want.”

There's not much meat here. This story concentrates on the actions alone, leaving emotions mostly to telly language and Tiara's forced conversations with herself. And her transforming attitude about Snails is a rather sudden one. It doesn't feel like something that would actually happen—more like it's molded that way for plot convenience. And since that's the entire source of the conflict and character growth here, none of it comes across as authentic. To be blunt, this needs a lot of work, and I'd recommend gaining more experience as a writer before attempting to give it a serious revision.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Foals happily ran about as the constant ringing of the bell announced the end of school.//</span><br />Three problems already. First, the bell doesn&#039;t ring that long. I&#039;d hardly characterize it as &quot;constant.&quot; And gviven that, &quot;as&quot; clauses imply concurrent action. They wouldn&#039;t run around until after it rang, not somehow be synchronized with it. And third, we have telly language, which is a bad thing to do right off the bat when you&#039;re trying to hook the reader. Read the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Of all the days for Silver Spoon to get sick, why must it be today? And I don’t even have those blank flanks around to make fun of!</i></span><br />This is a common issue: characters speaking to themselves in an overly formal manner and solely for the purpose of giving exposition. You have to make this type of thing feel natural, but it&#039;s forced here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond walked away from the schoolhouse, taking the dusty road in front of it//</span><br />Note that participles are prime candidates for misplaced modifiers. This one&#039;s not bad, as we can apply a bit of logic to sort it out, but if you don&#039;t pay attention, you&#039;ll eventually say something ambiguous or outright misleading. Participles ike to latch onto the nearest available object, so it sounds like the schoolhouse is taking the road.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The warm rays of the sun and the soft chirps of the birds//</span><br />This type of indirect possession is often clunky and unwarranted. If there&#039;s some thematic or stylistic reason you want to put special focus on the rays or the chirps, fine, but I don&#039;t see any here. &quot;The sun&#039;s warm rays and the birds&#039; soft chirping&quot; is more concise and direct.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond’s line of thought was abruptly lost//</span><br />Passive voice is a more prevalent but similar issue. If there&#039;s a reason you need to draw attention to the &quot;line of thought&quot; far more so than Diamond, fine, but there&#039;s no need here. Passive voice is an inherently boring structure; it really only works when you need it&#039;s ability to divert attention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond changed her course, and walked over the grassy field towards the mysterious silhouette.//</span><br />See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(that probably appeared because of the tempest that plagued Ponyville last night),//</span><br />Parentheticals strike a much more conversational tone than your narrator is using. They don&#039;t really fit with an objective viewpoint. And the way you&#039;ve structured that sentence, you shouldn&#039;t use the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his yellow coat with a brown color for a brief moment, before most of the brown liquid flowed back into the pool//</span><br />I&#039;m getting color overload here, given that you already mentioned Snails&#039;s two colors, and your use of &quot;coat&quot; is immediately misleading in this context. Plus, the double use of &quot;brown&quot; is repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She knew that Snails was a bit strange - but to play//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as if he was a pig//</span><br />When speaking hypothetically like this, please use subjunctive mood = &quot;as if he were&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s really fun, it’s like playing in a pool and in the sand at the same time.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Snails’//</span><br />While it&#039;s common to see this, the proper possessive is still to put the full apostrophe-s on for singular words, even when they already end in &quot;s.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Only a slow and dumb pony like yourself could think that such thing would be fu-//</span><br />Missing a word. And once again, please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At that moment a big blob of mud hit her right in the face, spreading the mud through most of her fur and making her tiara fall on the grass.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;mud,&quot; which exposes a bigger problem. You have another bad participle here, and this time, it&#039;s a dangling one: whatever it modifies never appears in the sentence. The only options for what is &quot;spreading the mud&quot; are &quot;face&quot; (somehow, I doubt her face is spreading mud) and &quot;blob of mud&quot; (it spreads itself?)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the source of the laughter: a certain unicorn that was rolling around in laughter//</span><br />So, the source of laughter is laughter? I see…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“It. Is. On…” Diamond said with a intense stare.//</span><br />Typo. And why is DT doing Rarity&#039;s schtick?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How <i>dare</i> you dirty me and my tiara!?//</span><br />That&#039;s not normally posed as any sort of question. You can just go with the exclamation mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The response was Snails popping his head out from the mud and sputtering mud on her face with his mouth.//</span><br />Yet more repetition of &quot;mud.&quot; You&#039;re in the middle of a stretch where you use the word 15 times in 13 paragraphs!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With incredible agility, Snails, still inside the mud, moved from the spot where he was to a few feet behind Diamond Tiara, who was looking around for him.</span><br />So, she&#039;s on top of him, and then somehow loses track of where he is? I&#039;m not buying it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Using his horn//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off participles with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With incredible reflexes//</span><br />You do this in several places. It&#039;s unclear which perspective your narrator has adopted. So when he goes on to make a judgment like &quot;incredible,&quot; whose opinion is that? I don&#039;t mind hearing a character&#039;s opinion, but if the narrator isn&#039;t speaking for one of them, I don&#039;t care what he thinks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And the feelings of disdain and anger that Diamond Tiara had became feelings of joy that caused her to smile like she never smiled before.//</span><br />Yeah, this is majorly telly language. Get me to figure out what she feels. Don&#039;t just tell me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Sun//</span><br />Why is that capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The memory sparked an idea within her mind. She got up from the grass and walked towards Snails. Noticing this, he rolled on his stomach and looked at her.//</span><br />See, now you do adopt a perspective. Somewhat. But it&#039;s jerking back and forth between them. Within the same paragraph. Only she could know that an idea had sparked in her mind, and only he could know that he noticed it, unless you narrate how one of them perceived those things about the other by reading thei body language, for example.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyes that shined like two jewels//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; takes a direct object. It&#039;s what you do to shoes and brass. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Wha- what is it?” he managed to stutter//</span><br />When you&#039;ve already spelled out the stutter, you don&#039;t need to mention it again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You’re in,”//</span><br />Given what happens after this, I think you meant to say &quot;it.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;following behind//</span><br />Redundant<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a unexpected turn//</span><br />Typo. Really, most word processors will catch this type of mistake.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In a flash, an idea appeared on Snails’ mind, an idea that turned his happy grin into a wicked smile.//</span><br />&quot;in Snails&#039;s mind.&quot; And he just got the idea that &quot;Hey, I can actually catch her! Good thing I remembered!&quot; That&#039;s awfully contrived.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And…” Diamond shuffled closer to Snails’ side, causing her pink fur to mix with his yellow fur, “you can call me Dia if you want.”//</span><br />Tossing an aside into a quote is done like this:<br />And—” Diamond shuffled closer to Snails’ side, causing her pink fur to mix with his yellow fur “—you can call me Dia if you want.”<br /><br />There&#039;s not much meat here. This story concentrates on the actions alone, leaving emotions mostly to telly language and Tiara&#039;s forced conversations with herself. And her transforming attitude about Snails is a rather sudden one. It doesn&#039;t feel like something that would actually happen—more like it&#039;s molded that way for plot convenience. And since that&#039;s the entire source of the conflict and character growth here, none of it comes across as authentic. To be blunt, this needs a lot of work, and I&#039;d recommend gaining more experience as a writer before attempting to give it a serious revision.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 35

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:

>Rainbow Dash finds herself hospitalized with injuries after going into a flat spin while trying to teach Twilight Sparkle some new moves. While there, finds herself rooming with Ivy Cluster, a young colt suffering from leukemia.//

Missing word and close repetition of "while." Also, I doubt readers will care, but the idea of a horse going into a sustained flat spin is laughable. (Yes, aerodynamics is my day job.)

>she finds herself needing//

So, for the second time in three sentences, she "finds herself" doing something. Besides being repetitive, this is a commonly overused expression by inexperienced writers.

>Rainbow must confront the loss, and the fundamental fact that life is not fair.//

Unnecessary comma.

Story:

>You were trying to show me how to do something you called a ‘yaw turn’ when suddenly you began to…I think ‘stall’ is the word?//

Stall would be very gentle for something like a pegasus wing that's not really pushing the boundaries of design. Natural wings are pretty all-purpose as opposed to something that would have a hard stall due to being designed for a very specific use. What'd strike me as more realistic is an asymmetric stall during a hard pull-up, which would roll her pretty badly and might even get her into a pilot-induced oscillation. See, the problem with getting technical is that most readers won't know to question it, but you can be hung out to dry when a reader does know the subject. It pays to get it right.

>It was only now that Rainbow Dash realized she was in a hospital bed.//

Okay, now I can tell that you're writing from Dash's perspective. I'd encourage you to make that clear from sentence one. It came across as very sterile and clinical, where you should have had her coming out of a daze, wondering what the pounding in her head was, etc.

>Broken bones were part of the job when you wanted to be an ace flyer//

It can be tricky, but it's worth avoiding even the appearance of addressing the author.

>the inevitable result of failing to execute a trick properly//

But in canon, she's messed up tricks several times without breaking any bones.

>while we were worried you were unconscious due to a concussion, it appears to have just been the result of nausea and shock//

I must confess to being out of my element here, but do shock (possibly) and nausea (I doubt this one) really cause unconsciousness?

>Daring Do and the Crystal Chalice//

Book titles should be underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>for awhile//

"Awhile" and "a while" are often interchangeable, but you need a noun to serve as the preposition's object, so it should technically be two words here.

>The pain in her leg was intense.//

This is very bland. I'm just to take the narrator's word for it? Step me through her reaction. Give me some imagery as to what this feels like, show me her physical reaction, etc.

>Twilight smiled and began to head for the door. “I’ll make sure it’s in my saddlebag tomorrow. Now just try to relax, and get better soon. You wanna get better in time to see the Wonderbolts perform over Canterlot, don’t you?”//

Fine point here. "Begin" and "start" actions are overused by inexperienced writers, and I usually advise to refrain from using them except in cases where the beginning is worth accentuating because it's abrupt or the action never finishes. Taking it in that sense, this can work—she stops heading for the door to speak. Otherwise, she's just chattering as she keeps walking out into the hall. But you didn't show her stopping, so I can't assume that. And that's an awful lot of dialogue to get out if she doesn't stop. Might be worth clarifying.

>There were more important things to pay attention to than Twilight's motor mouth.//

I get that you mean the book is more important at the moment, but you don't transition to it at all. She just starts reading. It's a bit abrupt, given that this is a very cogent thought that doesn't feel at all distracted by said book.

>Rainbow Dash squealed with delight//

Placing a mood or emotion after in, for, or with is telly and almost always redundant. We already get the picture from the squeal. Just leave it at that.

>Almost.//

Indentation is off here.

>came a small male voice//

She's got plenty of time to identify him as male. At that age, it can be hard to tell the difference, so it's a little disconcerting to get a snap judgment.

>She was a little embarrassed to be caught reading aloud.//

A tiny bit repetitive with the line a few sentences back, but it's also a bit incongruous. She was adamant that a book like this demanded to be read, and while she didn't know Ivy was there, she couldn't have had any expectations that a nurse or doctor wouldn't enter unnanounced.

>This seemed to mollify her roommate//

Use of this, that, these, or those as pronouns is weak in narration, since they have broad antecedents and refer to the text itself. Try to find an appropriate noun to put after it.

>shuffling down into his sheets. He must have been trying to sit up//

Which is it? Down or up?

>Daring Do and the Coconut of Quendor//

Same deal with punctuating book titles.

>was very perceptive. “Are you saying I’m not smart?”//

These don't seem to go together, unless she's admitting she's not smart and she's afraid he noticed. You're also tossing me quite a lot of "to be" verbs here. It's not a killer, but see if you can keep things a bit more active.

>At least she and Ivy could agree on something.//

This makes it sound like they'd been in an argument, but there hasn't really been a point of contention, other than the single one Dash contrived.

>He was hooked up to numerous machines//

And given that the room had been quiet, did she hear any of them either now or earlier? Might add a bit of atmosphere.

>Rainbow Dash laid back in her bed and looked//

Lay/lie confusion. And the fourth use of "look" in the last five paragraphs.

>House//

Why is this capitalized?

>There was a deep sorrow in his voice, a sadness//

Given that this is a pretty critical emotional moment, I'd like to see it get more power than this. Some imagery would work here. Be sure to concentrate exactly what about his voice conveys sadness instead of just telling me that's what it is, but keep th language under control so it still sounds compatible with Dash.

>How… How//

Inconsistent with your prior spacing of ellipses.

>He looked cold, despite the fact that he had more blankets than Rainbow Dash. Rainbow turned back to her book, glad for an excuse not to look at the colt.//

"Look" instances 8 and 9 of 22 in the story. That's getting up there, especially since you tend to use them in clumps like this.

>Pinkie was a total spaz, but at least she was good to have around when you needed cheering up.//

Addressing the reader again, and hitting me with the "to be" verbs again. For instance, consider "it came in handy to have her around" in place of "she was good to have around." It's a more active construct.

>On the inside it was yellow cake with chocolate marbling//

How does she know this? You haven't mentioned cutting into it yet.

>combination of sugar and chocolate//

Not sure what you mean by this, since chocolate generally includes sugar.

>Rainbow Dash messily dug in to a piece//

Not sure this is in character for her. I haven't seen any adult eat messily except Pinkie.

>as soon as they left he had started crying//

Comma between the clauses.

>petulant//

For someone who thinks "tenacious" is a sneeze, I doubt she knows that word, and it's generally a good idea to keep your narrator within the ballpark of the perspective character's intelligence level.

>Pinkie Pie grabbed a slice of cake and put it on a paper plate, bouncing over to the other side of the curtain.//

Watch for misplaced modifiers. By their proximity, it sounds like the plate is bouncing.

>she stopped suddenly//

Missed capitalization. This isn't a speech tag.

>Rainbow pulled aside the curtain to see the action the action.//



>She was somewhat relieved.//

Give be a brief reaction here instead. Her jaw unclenches, her shoulders relax, she sighs… something like one of those.

>“It’s not just chocolate”//

Missing punctuation.

>MARBLED//

Italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis.

>until he started crying//

It's starting to get a bit melodramatic that he cries as much as he does. Children are amazingly resilient about such things, and just come to accept them as the way things are.

>Pinkie hefted a bite-sized piece of the cake with a plastic fork.//

Wait, you said the nurse was helping him.

>‘Keep Smiling, signed Ponyacci ‘//

Extraneous space.

>while Rainbow was thoroughly sick of the joke//

But she was taking measures to make sure she didn't hear it…

>It was hard to look at him, sometimes.//

Unnecessary comma.

>but incredibly sad//

You're beating this drum awfully loudly.

>I dunno kid

Missing comma for direct address.

>Besides, Ivy//

Extraneous space.

>Rainbow Dash bit her lip and looked at the floor. “Then what’s got you scared?” said Rainbow, biting her lip and looking at the floor.//

So, she's biting her lip and looking at the floor, you say?

>sonic rainboom//

Inconsistent capitalization.

>She was, halfway through the book.//

Unnecessary comma.

>She wasn’t supposed to cry, she was supposed to be the tough, cool pony that everypony looked up to.//

Comma splice.

>It’s not just good publicity, it keeps one humble.//

Another comma splice.

>The nurse frowned, looking down at the floor.//

Her reaction is pretty bland. Put yourself in her position. What would you say to Dash? How would you act? The nurse is pretty familiar with her, so it's not like she's talking to a stranger.

>“Buck you!” This wasn’t supposed to happen! “You bucking idiots!//

Oh, goody. Using "buck" as an expletive, especially since it'd be very inappropriate the first time she said it several scenes ago.

>Rainbows shoulder//

Missing apostrophe.

>Dashie, please!//

When has Twilight ever called her that?

>Rainbow Dash moved to kick at the desk//

She already kicked it…

>Twilight began to cry.//

I'm unclear as to her motivation for doing so, other than the token sadness here. Does she feel bad for Dash? Or had she become attached to Ivy as well from her visits with Dash?

>Please Rainbow//

Missing comma for direct address again.

>princess!

When used as a term of address, capitalize this. And when ! or ? is attached to an italicized word, italicize it, too.

>If Celestia, or I, could have made//

Unnecessary commas.

>Rainbow Dash felt a tear run down her cheek.//

Oh, please don't do the single tear cliche.

>“But you didn’t!”//

This doesn't follow from what Twilight said. Is Dash just misunderstanding her?

>Twilight panted for breath.//

She's that out of shape? She hasn't gone very far.

>“Tell it to Ivy!” mumbled Dash//

I'm not sure how you mumble something emphatically.

>She leaned into Twilight, trying her best to hide her sobs.//

The exact action Twilight just did in the last paragraph… And your participle is truly ambiguous here. By proximity, Twilight is trying to hide her sobs, but I think you actually meant Dash, and there's no way to say definitively.

>“I miss him.”//

That's a pretty rapid transition for someone who didn't want to be seen crying just a couple of paragraphs ago.

>wiped a tear from her cheek//

Not again…

>Rainbow Dash sniffed//

She just did so. She can again, but call attention to the repetition, so it doesn't appear as an oversight.

In this penultimate scene, scroll down the page and note what the first word of each paragraph is. I think you'll notice a pattern. Unless they reinforce something thematic, patterns are a bad thing.

>It felt weird talking to a stone that represented somepony instead of the pony itself.//

Yeah, you've said three times already that it was weird or awkward. And yet her dialogue isn't coming across as forced. Consider how comfortable she was in her hospital room reading aloud when she thought she was alone. Now she is, so why is it such a big deal? I could see her finding a nice peace precisely because of that.

>It just wasn't the same//

I'd axe this, given that she says exactly this just after.

>With that//

That's another type of phrase I usually advise avoiding, since it directly references the narration.

I almost feel like something's missing between the last two scenes. For one, it might help smooth the about-face of attitude she has. For another, did she attend the funeral? What happened there? But, you know, that could easily come down to personal preference. A lot of the things I've marked are pretty subjective and are meant more as suggestions.

I found this at least an authentic depiction of how this would happen, but I felt a bit distant from it. There's plenty of info like body language that tends to draw the reader closer to the character, but I still didn't quite connect, and that may just be me. Take this line: "Rainbow didn’t want to admit it, but she needed this hug very badly." That's a more insidious kind of telling to root out, but consider that while it doesn't directly tell me of her emotions, it's exceptionally close to doing so, and more to the point, it's not something that creates a visual on its own. Convince me she needs the hug. What kinds of thinga might do that? Well, She could accept it and try to fight it in fits and starts. Maybe she can read from Twilight's reaction that she's surprised at how long Dash stays in the hug. Maybe Twi assumes it's over and pulls back, but Dash doesn't let go, so Twi squeezes her again. And Dash just enjoys the feeling of a warm coat against her cheek. These are the kinds of subtleties that can really draw a reader in.

Really, the only things I'd say you need to fix are the mechanical issues and a few bits that are essentially plot holes. But give the rest a think as well and decide what you agree would help the story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash finds herself hospitalized with injuries after going into a flat spin while trying to teach Twilight Sparkle some new moves. While there, finds herself rooming with Ivy Cluster, a young colt suffering from leukemia.//</span><br />Missing word and close repetition of &quot;while.&quot; Also, I doubt readers will care, but the idea of a horse going into a sustained flat spin is laughable. (Yes, aerodynamics is my day job.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she finds herself needing//</span><br />So, for the second time in three sentences, she &quot;finds herself&quot; doing something. Besides being repetitive, this is a commonly overused expression by inexperienced writers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow must confront the loss, and the fundamental fact that life is not fair.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br />Story:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You were trying to show me how to do something you called a ‘yaw turn’ when suddenly you began to…I think ‘stall’ is the word?//</span><br />Stall would be very gentle for something like a pegasus wing that&#039;s not really pushing the boundaries of design. Natural wings are pretty all-purpose as opposed to something that would have a hard stall due to being designed for a very specific use. What&#039;d strike me as more realistic is an asymmetric stall during a hard pull-up, which would roll her pretty badly and might even get her into a pilot-induced oscillation. See, the problem with getting technical is that most readers won&#039;t know to question it, but you can be hung out to dry when a reader does know the subject. It pays to get it right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was only now that Rainbow Dash realized she was in a hospital bed.//</span><br />Okay, now I can tell that you&#039;re writing from Dash&#039;s perspective. I&#039;d encourage you to make that clear from sentence one. It came across as very sterile and clinical, where you should have had her coming out of a daze, wondering what the pounding in her head was, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Broken bones were part of the job when you wanted to be an ace flyer//</span><br />It can be tricky, but it&#039;s worth avoiding even the appearance of addressing the author.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the inevitable result of failing to execute a trick properly//</span><br />But in canon, she&#039;s messed up tricks several times without breaking any bones.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while we were worried you were unconscious due to a concussion, it appears to have just been the result of nausea and shock//</span><br />I must confess to being out of my element here, but do shock (possibly) and nausea (I doubt this one) really cause unconsciousness?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Daring Do and the Crystal Chalice//</span><br />Book titles should be underlined or (preferably) italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for awhile//</span><br />&quot;Awhile&quot; and &quot;a while&quot; are often interchangeable, but you need a noun to serve as the preposition&#039;s object, so it should technically be two words here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pain in her leg was intense.//</span><br />This is very bland. I&#039;m just to take the narrator&#039;s word for it? Step me through her reaction. Give me some imagery as to what this feels like, show me her physical reaction, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight smiled and began to head for the door. “I’ll make sure it’s in my saddlebag tomorrow. Now just try to relax, and get better soon. You wanna get better in time to see the Wonderbolts perform over Canterlot, don’t you?”//</span><br />Fine point here. &quot;Begin&quot; and &quot;start&quot; actions are overused by inexperienced writers, and I usually advise to refrain from using them except in cases where the beginning is worth accentuating because it&#039;s abrupt or the action never finishes. Taking it in that sense, this can work—she stops heading for the door to speak. Otherwise, she&#039;s just chattering as she keeps walking out into the hall. But you didn&#039;t show her stopping, so I can&#039;t assume that. And that&#039;s an awful lot of dialogue to get out if she doesn&#039;t stop. Might be worth clarifying.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There were more important things to pay attention to than Twilight&#039;s motor mouth.//</span><br />I get that you mean the book is more important at the moment, but you don&#039;t transition to it at all. She just starts reading. It&#039;s a bit abrupt, given that this is a very cogent thought that doesn&#039;t feel at all distracted by said book.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash squealed with delight//</span><br />Placing a mood or emotion after in, for, or with is telly and almost always redundant. We already get the picture from the squeal. Just leave it at that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Almost.//</span><br />Indentation is off here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;came a small male voice//</span><br />She&#039;s got plenty of time to identify him as male. At that age, it can be hard to tell the difference, so it&#039;s a little disconcerting to get a snap judgment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was a little embarrassed to be caught reading aloud.//</span><br />A tiny bit repetitive with the line a few sentences back, but it&#039;s also a bit incongruous. She was adamant that a book like this demanded to be read, and while she didn&#039;t know Ivy was there, she couldn&#039;t have had any expectations that a nurse or doctor wouldn&#039;t enter unnanounced.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This seemed to mollify her roommate//</span><br />Use of this, that, these, or those as pronouns is weak in narration, since they have broad antecedents and refer to the text itself. Try to find an appropriate noun to put after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shuffling down into his sheets. He must have been trying to sit up//</span><br />Which is it? Down or up?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Daring Do and the Coconut of Quendor//</span><br />Same deal with punctuating book titles.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was very perceptive. “Are you saying I’m not smart?”//</span><br />These don&#039;t seem to go together, unless she&#039;s admitting she&#039;s not smart and she&#039;s afraid he noticed. You&#039;re also tossing me quite a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs here. It&#039;s not a killer, but see if you can keep things a bit more active.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At least she and Ivy could agree on something.//</span><br />This makes it sound like they&#039;d been in an argument, but there hasn&#039;t really been a point of contention, other than the single one Dash contrived.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was hooked up to numerous machines//</span><br />And given that the room had been quiet, did she hear any of them either now or earlier? Might add a bit of atmosphere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash laid back in her bed and looked//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. And the fourth use of &quot;look&quot; in the last five paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;House//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was a deep sorrow in his voice, a sadness//</span><br />Given that this is a pretty critical emotional moment, I&#039;d like to see it get more power than this. Some imagery would work here. Be sure to concentrate exactly what about his voice conveys sadness instead of just telling me that&#039;s what it is, but keep th language under control so it still sounds compatible with Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How… How//</span><br />Inconsistent with your prior spacing of ellipses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He looked cold, despite the fact that he had more blankets than Rainbow Dash. Rainbow turned back to her book, glad for an excuse not to look at the colt.//</span><br />&quot;Look&quot; instances 8 and 9 of 22 in the story. That&#039;s getting up there, especially since you tend to use them in clumps like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie was a total spaz, but at least she was good to have around when you needed cheering up.//</span><br />Addressing the reader again, and hitting me with the &quot;to be&quot; verbs again. For instance, consider &quot;it came in handy to have her around&quot; in place of &quot;she was good to have around.&quot; It&#039;s a more active construct.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On the inside it was yellow cake with chocolate marbling//</span><br />How does she know this? You haven&#039;t mentioned cutting into it yet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;combination of sugar and chocolate//</span><br />Not sure what you mean by this, since chocolate generally includes sugar.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash messily dug in to a piece//</span><br />Not sure this is in character for her. I haven&#039;t seen any adult eat messily except Pinkie.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as soon as they left he had started crying//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;petulant//</span><br />For someone who thinks &quot;tenacious&quot; is a sneeze, I doubt she knows that word, and it&#039;s generally a good idea to keep your narrator within the ballpark of the perspective character&#039;s intelligence level.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie grabbed a slice of cake and put it on a paper plate, bouncing over to the other side of the curtain.//</span><br />Watch for misplaced modifiers. By their proximity, it sounds like the plate is bouncing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she stopped suddenly//</span><br />Missed capitalization. This isn&#039;t a speech tag.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow pulled aside the curtain to see the action the action.//</span><br />…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was somewhat relieved.//</span><br />Give be a brief reaction here instead. Her jaw unclenches, her shoulders relax, she sighs… something like one of those.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“It’s not just chocolate”//</span><br />Missing punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;MARBLED//</span><br />Italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;until he started crying//</span><br />It&#039;s starting to get a bit melodramatic that he cries as much as he does. Children are amazingly resilient about such things, and just come to accept them as the way things are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie hefted a bite-sized piece of the cake with a plastic fork.//</span><br />Wait, you said the nurse was helping him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Keep Smiling, signed Ponyacci ‘//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while Rainbow was thoroughly sick of the joke//</span><br />But she was taking measures to make sure she didn&#039;t hear it…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was hard to look at him, sometimes.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but incredibly sad//</span><br />You&#039;re beating this drum awfully loudly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I dunno kid</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Besides, Ivy//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash bit her lip and looked at the floor. “Then what’s got you scared?” said Rainbow, biting her lip and looking at the floor.//</span><br />So, she&#039;s biting her lip and looking at the floor, you say?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sonic rainboom//</span><br />Inconsistent capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was, halfway through the book.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wasn’t supposed to cry, she was supposed to be the tough, cool pony that everypony looked up to.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s not just good publicity, it keeps one humble.//</span><br />Another comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The nurse frowned, looking down at the floor.//</span><br />Her reaction is pretty bland. Put yourself in her position. What would you say to Dash? How would you act? The nurse is pretty familiar with her, so it&#039;s not like she&#039;s talking to a stranger.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Buck you!” This wasn’t supposed to happen! “You bucking idiots!//</span><br />Oh, goody. Using &quot;buck&quot; as an expletive, especially since it&#039;d be very inappropriate the first time she said it several scenes ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbows shoulder//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dashie, please!//</span><br />When has Twilight ever called her that?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash moved to kick at the desk//</span><br />She already kicked it…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight began to cry.//</span><br />I&#039;m unclear as to her motivation for doing so, other than the token sadness here. Does she feel bad for Dash? Or had she become attached to Ivy as well from her visits with Dash?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Please Rainbow//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>princess</i>!</span><br />When used as a term of address, capitalize this. And when ! or ? is attached to an italicized word, italicize it, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If Celestia, or I, could have made//</span><br />Unnecessary commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash felt a tear run down her cheek.//</span><br />Oh, please don&#039;t do the single tear cliche.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“But you didn’t!”//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t follow from what Twilight said. Is Dash just misunderstanding her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight panted for breath.//</span><br />She&#039;s that out of shape? She hasn&#039;t gone very far.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Tell it to Ivy!” mumbled Dash//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure how you mumble something emphatically.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She leaned into Twilight, trying her best to hide her sobs.//</span><br />The exact action Twilight just did in the last paragraph… And your participle is truly ambiguous here. By proximity, Twilight is trying to hide her sobs, but I think you actually meant Dash, and there&#039;s no way to say definitively.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I miss him.”//</span><br />That&#039;s a pretty rapid transition for someone who didn&#039;t want to be seen crying just a couple of paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wiped a tear from her cheek//</span><br />Not again…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash sniffed//</span><br />She just did so. She can again, but call attention to the repetition, so it doesn&#039;t appear as an oversight.<br /><br />In this penultimate scene, scroll down the page and note what the first word of each paragraph is. I think you&#039;ll notice a pattern. Unless they reinforce something thematic, patterns are a bad thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It felt weird talking to a stone that represented somepony instead of the pony itself.//</span><br />Yeah, you&#039;ve said three times already that it was weird or awkward. And yet her dialogue isn&#039;t coming across as forced. Consider how comfortable she was in her hospital room reading aloud when she thought she was alone. Now she is, so why is it such a big deal? I could see her finding a nice peace precisely because of that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It just wasn&#039;t the same//</span><br />I&#039;d axe this, given that she says exactly this just after.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that//</span><br />That&#039;s another type of phrase I usually advise avoiding, since it directly references the narration.<br /><br />I almost feel like something&#039;s missing between the last two scenes. For one, it might help smooth the about-face of attitude she has. For another, did she attend the funeral? What happened there? But, you know, that could easily come down to personal preference. A lot of the things I&#039;ve marked are pretty subjective and are meant more as suggestions.<br /><br />I found this at least an authentic depiction of how this would happen, but I felt a bit distant from it. There&#039;s plenty of info like body language that tends to draw the reader closer to the character, but I still didn&#039;t quite connect, and that may just be me. Take this line: &quot;Rainbow didn’t want to admit it, but she needed this hug very badly.&quot; That&#039;s a more insidious kind of telling to root out, but consider that while it doesn&#039;t directly tell me of her emotions, it&#039;s exceptionally close to doing so, and more to the point, it&#039;s not something that creates a visual on its own. Convince me she needs the hug. What kinds of thinga might do that? Well, She could accept it and try to fight it in fits and starts. Maybe she can read from Twilight&#039;s reaction that she&#039;s surprised at how long Dash stays in the hug. Maybe Twi assumes it&#039;s over and pulls back, but Dash doesn&#039;t let go, so Twi squeezes her again. And Dash just enjoys the feeling of a warm coat against her cheek. These are the kinds of subtleties that can really draw a reader in.<br /><br />Really, the only things I&#039;d say you <i>need</i> to fix are the mechanical issues and a few bits that are essentially plot holes. But give the rest a think as well and decide what you agree would help the story.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 36

>>129124
>I must confess to being out of my element here, but do shock (possibly) and nausea (I doubt this one) really cause unconsciousness?
Yes.

(Don't bother about me, I just wanted to answer this question.)<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129124" onclick="return highlight('129124', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129124">&gt;&gt;129124</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I must confess to being out of my element here, but do shock (possibly) and nausea (I doubt this one) really cause unconsciousness?</span><br />Yes.<br /><br />(Don&#039;t bother about me, I just wanted to answer this question.)<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 37

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First, let me say that I read a few paragraphs in before I started compiling notes. So I will note here that I already like the tone you're striking and I like your idea for the story, but some things about the way you're telling it aren't sitting right with me. I'll try to point out as many of those as I can.

>I tapped my chin with my hoofsie.//

I loved the first few sentences until I got to this one. Not that they were perfect—they all had the same structure and length, so got to feel repetitive (1: main clause, participial phrase; 2: main clause, absolute phrase, which uses a participial verb form; 3: main clause, participial phrase). But I didn't know until this sentence that the narrator was Pinkie. That nice imagery and calming language you'd used all of a sudden felt out of place. It's often a good idea anyway to have your narrator roughly mirror the focus character's attitude, sensibilities, and intelligence, but it's crucial when that character is the narrator. And this just doesn't sound like language Pinkie would use.

Edit: I didn't see too much more of this, really, but while your Pinkie voice was convincing, the second chapter in Celestia's voice came across as more bland. I didn't get the sense that there was a lot going on beneath the surface, except where you went out of your way to say so explicitly, which isn't the best way of doing it.

>I added ‘mind reading’ to my mental list of ‘Things Princess Celestia can do because she’s Princess Celestia’. I also added it to my paper list, which I stuffed in my mane once I was done with it.//

You don't need to capitalize "Things" the way you're using it. But my main issue in this exceprt is a lack of reactions. Pinkie doesn't react to Celestia's apparent mind reading, other than a matter-of-fact thought about it? And then you have this nice sight gag, but it loses its absurdity when you omit part of the action (her pulling out the list and writing on it), which would have added a ridiculousness factor for Celestia taking no notice of it, or, well, having Celestia take notice of it and offer a reaction.

>Not the business, or the ponies Applejack likes, but the cube.//

This comes across as forced, since she already identified them as being in packets.

>‘Cause//

Smart quotes always give you a backwards leading apostrophe. You'll have to fix it manually. In fact, you have quite a few of these.

>cheerfully//

Your choice of speaking verb already conveys this. No need to be telly.

>Both of us were sat on her bed//

Syntax implies that someone else was responsible for sitting them there.

>your Highness//

Capitalize both words.

>one on one//

In this instance, hyphenate.

>I am glad to hear that, I never would have thought otherwise.//

Comma splice.

>every day, bringing light onto a new day//

A bit repetitive use of "day."

>I looked up at her with pleading eyes.//

Here's why first-person narrators get somewhat of a pass for being telly, at least about their own emotions. It's awfully self-aware of her to describe her own eyes as pleading.

>Maybe she could all those royal things//

Missing word.

>you gain more experience each time you level up//

Why the gamer reference? That really supposes a lot about Equestrian culture, that it's a pervasive enough expression that Pinkie would know what it meant, or that despite all canon evidence, she's a gamer herself. This line killed the mood for me.

>lil’//

li’l

>while I got wrapped up in magic and got lowered to the ground//

Repetitive phrasing.

>The calendar had pictures of my friends for every month.//

This sentence is completely out of place. It has nothing to do with what's going on, and it doesn't seem like the kind of detail she'd notice right then, anyway.

>you’re birthday//

Your/you're confusion.

>What about her sister?//

This really does beg the question: would Luna know when Celestia's birthday is? And do they know when Luna's is?

>Celestia sipped her tea, thinking.//

Three things about this: Watch for misplaced modifiers. Participles try to modify the nearest prior object, so it sounds like the tea is thinking. Second, you've been using "think," or other variations on it, a lot lately. Third, it might be better anyway to describe her appearance and get me to realize she's thinking instead of just telling me that.

>Or maybe that was Celestia’s perfume.//

This kind of defeated what was building into a nice sweet moment.

>Even after I passed away, I’d make sure that her birthday date would be in my will, and remembered for all time.//

Oddly morbid thought, and if she starts celebrating her birthday on the summer solstice and Celestia endorses the practice, Pinkie shouldn't be worried that it wouldn't continue, anyway.

>Yeah, Celestia has rock wings.//

That's just weird…

>She had lost//

I think you're missing a direct object here.

>It was cold all of a sudden and my tongue didn't like that one bit.//

Missing comma between the clauses.

>I may have not known her//

There's a fine shade of meaning between this and "I may not have known her," and I don't think you chose the right one.

>deciding to change tact//

The phrase is "change tack." It's an expression taken from sailing.

>earnesty//

earnestness

>was a delight to watch//

I'm not going to point out every place—in fact, I'm only pointing out a couple—but places like this really keep the reader at a disconnect. Like I said, you get somewhat of a reprieve from showing for a first-person narrator, but you still need to try in moments like this, where there's a nice subtle undercurrent, and you could really get the reader to identify with the character. Give me more about how this makes her feel, not just that it was a delight. What physical sensations might it bring? What imagery might she use to describe it? This is a symptom of a larger issue: you're passing up opportunities to delve beyond what happens and let us see how the characters feel about it. Or you do, but in such a way that it gives us the emotions directly instead of getting us to interpret them from cues. You might benefit from reading the show versus tell section at the top of this thread.

>Of all the Elements, Laughter is the brightest. Yes, Magic is very powerful, but it requires the other elements in order to be such. Laughter does not have such an issue. Laughter stands tall, a light in the darkness, a beacon of hope.//

Point taken about Magic's role, but you've made a bold statement here that Laughter is superior to the remaining four elements, too, without backing it up. If you'd made a less extreme point, maybe, but you set it apart, then abandoned the line of reasoning.

>Neigh//

Pony puns really don't help carry a serious mood. And now you've used this one twice.

>I opened my wing, gesturing at the space around it with a nod.//

This is just a little creepy…

>pristine looking//

Hyphenate compound modifiers.

>and offered it to.//

Missing word.

>I didn’t decline; it looked luscious. It tasted just as good as it looked.//

This goes by awfully fast. I think dwelling a bit on her enjoyment of the treat would make for a nice moment.

>eyes-wide//

Opposite problem here: you don't need that hyphen.

>Said hoof then touched my nose, leaving it covered in a sugary mess.//

That's awfully presumptuous of her.

Watch your use of "to be" verbs. Here are my counts of the most common forms:
was: 67
is: 26
were: 9
be: 18
been: 4
That's an awful lot for this length of story. It can indicate telly language (somewhat of a problem), overuse of passive voice (I didn't really see any that I felt was unwarranted), or a need to choose more active verbs (that's the big one here). Even something as simple as "his shirt was red" versus "he wore a red shirt." Many instances are easy to change, and they give your prose a much more active and interesting feel. Readers are more engaged by what happens, not what is. It's not necessary to get rid of them all, but I bet you could effect a significant reduction and make your story much more readable in the process.

I usually try to make some wrap-up comments here, but it'd just be harping on all the things I've already said. There's not some overarching wisdom to impart. So, succinctly, you need a little closer emotional attachment between the reader and your characters. Give me more about how they feel about what they're saying, but in abstract terms: what imagery it inspires, how it makes them act, what they think about it. You do it right in some places, so I know you're capable.

The last thing I'll say is that a story needs either a conflict or some character growth. You're obviously going for the latter here, but it's still pretty weak. Yes, Pinkie's undecided, but that doesn't mean she didn't learn anything. It could be that the lesson hasn't sunk it yet, or that it has and she doesn't know what she wants to do about it yet. Again, I think you're going for the latter, but just because she hasn't pledged to live her life differently, she can still have an epiphany. She hasn't considered this possibility before, and suddenly there it is. Does she ask some new questions? Does she hold it inside, but clearly has an "aha" moment? What would that look like? Character growth means contrasting the before and after, and shows or implies what consequences occur. Celestia also sees Pinkie off on the first step of her journey, but since Pinkie isn't embracing it fully, what might Celestia do to convince her? Maybe invite her to tea again, with an obvious topic of conversation? Make it a regular appointment? I'm also curious as to what made Celestia think of doing this in the first place. What evidence did she have that everything wasn't right with Pinkie?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />First, let me say that I read a few paragraphs in before I started compiling notes. So I will note here that I already like the tone you&#039;re striking and I like your idea for the story, but some things about the way you&#039;re telling it aren&#039;t sitting right with me. I&#039;ll try to point out as many of those as I can.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I tapped my chin with my hoofsie.//</span><br />I loved the first few sentences until I got to this one. Not that they were perfect—they all had the same structure and length, so got to feel repetitive (1: main clause, participial phrase; 2: main clause, absolute phrase, which uses a participial verb form; 3: main clause, participial phrase). But I didn&#039;t know until this sentence that the narrator was Pinkie. That nice imagery and calming language you&#039;d used all of a sudden felt out of place. It&#039;s often a good idea anyway to have your narrator roughly mirror the focus character&#039;s attitude, sensibilities, and intelligence, but it&#039;s crucial when that character is the narrator. And this just doesn&#039;t sound like language Pinkie would use.<br /><br />Edit: I didn&#039;t see too much more of this, really, but while your Pinkie voice was convincing, the second chapter in Celestia&#039;s voice came across as more bland. I didn&#039;t get the sense that there was a lot going on beneath the surface, except where you went out of your way to say so explicitly, which isn&#039;t the best way of doing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I added ‘mind reading’ to my mental list of ‘Things Princess Celestia can do because she’s Princess Celestia’. I also added it to my paper list, which I stuffed in my mane once I was done with it.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to capitalize &quot;Things&quot; the way you&#039;re using it. But my main issue in this exceprt is a lack of reactions. Pinkie doesn&#039;t react to Celestia&#039;s apparent mind reading, other than a matter-of-fact thought about it? And then you have this nice sight gag, but it loses its absurdity when you omit part of the action (her pulling out the list and writing on it), which would have added a ridiculousness factor for Celestia taking no notice of it, or, well, having Celestia take notice of it and offer a reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not the business, or the ponies Applejack likes, but the cube.//</span><br />This comes across as forced, since she already identified them as being in packets.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Cause//</span><br />Smart quotes always give you a backwards leading apostrophe. You&#039;ll have to fix it manually. In fact, you have quite a few of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cheerfully//</span><br />Your choice of speaking verb already conveys this. No need to be telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Both of us were sat on her bed//</span><br />Syntax implies that someone else was responsible for sitting them there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Highness//</span><br />Capitalize both words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one on one//</span><br />In this instance, hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am glad to hear that, I never would have thought otherwise.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;every day, bringing light onto a new day//</span><br />A bit repetitive use of &quot;day.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I looked up at her with pleading eyes.//</span><br />Here&#039;s why first-person narrators get somewhat of a pass for being telly, at least about their own emotions. It&#039;s awfully self-aware of her to describe her own eyes as pleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maybe she could all those royal things//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you gain more experience each time you level up//</span><br />Why the gamer reference? That really supposes a lot about Equestrian culture, that it&#039;s a pervasive enough expression that Pinkie would know what it meant, or that despite all canon evidence, she&#039;s a gamer herself. This line killed the mood for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lil’//</span><br />li’l<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while I got wrapped up in magic and got lowered to the ground//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The calendar had pictures of my friends for every month.//</span><br />This sentence is completely out of place. It has nothing to do with what&#039;s going on, and it doesn&#039;t seem like the kind of detail she&#039;d notice right then, anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you’re birthday//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What about her sister?//</span><br />This really does beg the question: would Luna know when Celestia&#039;s birthday is? And do they know when Luna&#039;s is?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia sipped her tea, thinking.//</span><br />Three things about this: Watch for misplaced modifiers. Participles try to modify the nearest prior object, so it sounds like the tea is thinking. Second, you&#039;ve been using &quot;think,&quot; or other variations on it, a lot lately. Third, it might be better anyway to describe her appearance and get me to realize she&#039;s thinking instead of just telling me that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Or maybe that was Celestia’s perfume.//</span><br />This kind of defeated what was building into a nice sweet moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even after I passed away, I’d make sure that her birthday date would be in my will, and remembered for all time.//</span><br />Oddly morbid thought, and if she starts celebrating her birthday on the summer solstice and Celestia endorses the practice, Pinkie shouldn&#039;t be worried that it wouldn&#039;t continue, anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, Celestia has rock wings.//</span><br />That&#039;s just weird…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had lost//</span><br />I think you&#039;re missing a direct object here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was cold all of a sudden and my tongue didn&#039;t like that one bit.//</span><br />Missing comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I may have not known her//</span><br />There&#039;s a fine shade of meaning between this and &quot;I may not have known her,&quot; and I don&#039;t think you chose the right one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;deciding to change tact//</span><br />The phrase is &quot;change tack.&quot; It&#039;s an expression taken from sailing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;earnesty//</span><br />earnestness<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was a delight to watch//</span><br />I&#039;m not going to point out every place—in fact, I&#039;m only pointing out a couple—but places like this really keep the reader at a disconnect. Like I said, you get somewhat of a reprieve from showing for a first-person narrator, but you still need to try in moments like this, where there&#039;s a nice subtle undercurrent, and you could really get the reader to identify with the character. Give me more about how this makes her feel, not just that it was a delight. What physical sensations might it bring? What imagery might she use to describe it? This is a symptom of a larger issue: you&#039;re passing up opportunities to delve beyond what happens and let us see how the characters feel about it. Or you do, but in such a way that it gives us the emotions directly instead of getting us to interpret them from cues. You might benefit from reading the show versus tell section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Of all the Elements, Laughter is the brightest. Yes, Magic is very powerful, but it requires the other elements in order to be such. Laughter does not have such an issue. Laughter stands tall, a light in the darkness, a beacon of hope.//</span><br />Point taken about Magic&#039;s role, but you&#039;ve made a bold statement here that Laughter is superior to the remaining four elements, too, without backing it up. If you&#039;d made a less extreme point, maybe, but you set it apart, then abandoned the line of reasoning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Neigh//</span><br />Pony puns really don&#039;t help carry a serious mood. And now you&#039;ve used this one twice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I opened my wing, gesturing at the space around it with a nod.//</span><br />This is just a little creepy…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pristine looking//</span><br />Hyphenate compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and offered it to.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn’t decline; it looked luscious. It tasted just as good as it looked.//</span><br />This goes by awfully fast. I think dwelling a bit on her enjoyment of the treat would make for a nice moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyes-wide//</span><br />Opposite problem here: you don&#039;t need that hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Said hoof then touched my nose, leaving it covered in a sugary mess.//</span><br />That&#039;s awfully presumptuous of her.<br /><br />Watch your use of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Here are my counts of the most common forms:<br />was: 67<br />is: 26<br />were: 9<br />be: 18<br />been: 4<br />That&#039;s an awful lot for this length of story. It can indicate telly language (somewhat of a problem), overuse of passive voice (I didn&#039;t really see any that I felt was unwarranted), or a need to choose more active verbs (that&#039;s the big one here). Even something as simple as &quot;his shirt was red&quot; versus &quot;he wore a red shirt.&quot; Many instances are easy to change, and they give your prose a much more active and interesting feel. Readers are more engaged by what happens, not what is. It&#039;s not necessary to get rid of them all, but I bet you could effect a significant reduction and make your story much more readable in the process.<br /><br />I usually try to make some wrap-up comments here, but it&#039;d just be harping on all the things I&#039;ve already said. There&#039;s not some overarching wisdom to impart. So, succinctly, you need a little closer emotional attachment between the reader and your characters. Give me more about how they feel about what they&#039;re saying, but in abstract terms: what imagery it inspires, how it makes them act, what they think about it. You do it right in some places, so I know you&#039;re capable.<br /><br />The last thing I&#039;ll say is that a story needs either a conflict or some character growth. You&#039;re obviously going for the latter here, but it&#039;s still pretty weak. Yes, Pinkie&#039;s undecided, but that doesn&#039;t mean she didn&#039;t learn anything. It could be that the lesson hasn&#039;t sunk it yet, or that it has and she doesn&#039;t know what she wants to do about it yet. Again, I think you&#039;re going for the latter, but just because she hasn&#039;t pledged to live her life differently, she can still have an epiphany. She hasn&#039;t considered this possibility before, and suddenly there it is. Does she ask some new questions? Does she hold it inside, but clearly has an &quot;aha&quot; moment? What would that look like? Character growth means contrasting the before and after, and shows or implies what consequences occur. Celestia also sees Pinkie off on the first step of her journey, but since Pinkie isn&#039;t embracing it fully, what might Celestia do to convince her? Maybe invite her to tea again, with an obvious topic of conversation? Make it a regular appointment? I&#039;m also curious as to what made Celestia think of doing this in the first place. What evidence did she have that everything wasn&#039;t right with Pinkie?<br />

JaketheGingerCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 38

>>129127
Hi there! Author of the fic here.

First of all, thanks for taking the time to review my story! It's nice to get some detailed feedback about my story, although I do understand the need for efficiency within the EQD pre-reading staff.

Also, I rarely use any 'chan' sites, so their layout horribly confuses me. Apologies if anything seems unclear in my posting.

I'll address bigger points and all that good stuff, 'cause there's quite a lot. (Which is good!)

First, Pinkie's narrative voice. Writing her is… tricky, at best. It's a fine line between keeping coherency and just the right amount of 'Pinkieness'. I tried to cut down on her going off on tangents, but without any it doesn't feel as Pinkie as it could be, at least to me.

As for the first few sentences… I kind of intended it to be a bit jarring. I fully believe Pinkie can take a look at things and see their beauty and think about it. Sure, we see her in the show as a random party pony, but I've always thought there's more to her than that. She's not just an extreme up or down. She has a whole lot of in between too. Now I'm going off on a tangent! If you'd like to discuss her further, feel free to poke me. Point is, writing her is a balance between subtlety and randomness, which probably can be jarring at times.

With Celestia, it was my first time writing her narrative voice, so I agree that it's probably a it bland.

With show vs. tell, I find it quite difficult to show. At least, with character emotions. I'm not sure why, but I find it pretty hard to describe a character's facial expression, other than just going "She frowned" or, "She smiled" or something more complex like "She furrowed her brows". Describing the face is tough, because even a minor movement can drastically change the way a character looks. And I do dislike repetition, but sometimes it's unavoidable, unfortunately. Still annoys me though!

Same kinda thing for sentence variation and 'to be' verbs. I do think I need more of them, but it's very tricky to thing of more varied ways when you're not sure of many ways to do it. I'm not trying to make sorry excuses; I think I have to read more fics.

Finally, the point of the story and character growth. I'll admit… there's not much a point to it. It was just a test that got a little out of hand: could I write Pinkie and Celestia in the story, with them just talking, and make it engaging? Hopefully I succeeded, but these matters are very subjective.

Thanks again for reviewing! Hope to hear from you soon!

-JaketheGinger
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129127" onclick="return highlight('129127', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129127">&gt;&gt;129127</a><br />Hi there! Author of the fic here. <br /><br />First of all, thanks for taking the time to review my story! It&#039;s nice to get some detailed feedback about my story, although I do understand the need for efficiency within the EQD pre-reading staff. <br /><br />Also, I rarely use any &#039;chan&#039; sites, so their layout horribly confuses me. Apologies if anything seems unclear in my posting. <br /><br />I&#039;ll address bigger points and all that good stuff, &#039;cause there&#039;s quite a lot. (Which is good!)<br /><br />First, Pinkie&#039;s narrative voice. Writing her is… tricky, at best. It&#039;s a fine line between keeping coherency and just the right amount of &#039;Pinkieness&#039;. I tried to cut down on her going off on tangents, but without any it doesn&#039;t feel as Pinkie as it could be, at least to me. <br /><br />As for the first few sentences… I kind of intended it to be a bit jarring. I fully believe Pinkie can take a look at things and see their beauty and think about it. Sure, we see her in the show as a random party pony, but I&#039;ve always thought there&#039;s more to her than that. She&#039;s not just an extreme up or down. She has a whole lot of in between too. Now I&#039;m going off on a tangent! If you&#039;d like to discuss her further, feel free to poke me. Point is, writing her is a balance between subtlety and randomness, which probably can be jarring at times.<br /><br />With Celestia, it was my first time writing her narrative voice, so I agree that it&#039;s probably a it bland.<br /><br />With show vs. tell, I find it quite difficult to show. At least, with character emotions. I&#039;m not sure why, but I find it pretty hard to describe a character&#039;s facial expression, other than just going &quot;She frowned&quot; or, &quot;She smiled&quot; or something more complex like &quot;She furrowed her brows&quot;. Describing the face is tough, because even a minor movement can drastically change the way a character looks. And I do dislike repetition, but sometimes it&#039;s unavoidable, unfortunately. Still annoys me though!<br /><br />Same kinda thing for sentence variation and &#039;to be&#039; verbs. I do think I need more of them, but it&#039;s very tricky to thing of more varied ways when you&#039;re not sure of many ways to do it. I&#039;m not trying to make sorry excuses; I think I have to read more fics. <br /><br />Finally, the point of the story and character growth. I&#039;ll admit… there&#039;s not much a point to it. It was just a test that got a little out of hand: could I write Pinkie and Celestia in the story, with them just talking, and make it engaging? Hopefully I succeeded, but these matters are very subjective. <br /><br />Thanks again for reviewing! Hope to hear from you soon!<br /><br />-JaketheGinger<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 39

>>129129
>writing her is a balance between subtlety and randomness, which probably can be jarring at times
Oh, I completely agree that Pinkie is capable of serious thought. But in canon, even when she is serious, she still has a rather playful way of talking about it. Take "Party of One," for example, or when she was worried about Dash going off to the Wonderbolts Academy.

Over those first few sentences, my concern wasn't so much what Pinkie was saying as how she was saying it. Those seemed to be much more formal and use word choices that I couldn't imagine for Pinkie.

>With show vs. tell, I find it quite difficult to show.

In that section at the top of this thread, I go into some more of the devices that writers can use. It does take some experience before a writer develops a good sense of what is or isn't telly and when telling is okay. It's not all facial expression. There are other things you can do than a frown or a furrowed brow. Take other synonyms that have sightly different connotations than a frown, like a scowl or a grimace. But then there's a lot of other body language: fidgeting to imply restlessness or distraction, trudging or plodding to indicate many flavors of sadness… There's what they say and what speaking verbs you use. Just imagine observing a real person in a conversation or really doing anything. What are all the little things they do? That's what adds all the realism and subtext, and that's what removes the need to have the narrator outright say how the character feels. Imagine your character is in a play, and the stage director is about to send him out for his scene. What would the director tell him to do to communicate his character's mood to the audience?

>Same kinda thing for sentence variation and 'to be' verbs.

These aren't that difficult to do, either, but it does take some concentration to remain aware of it. For "to be" verbs, it really is just this simple: when you find yourself using one, see if you can rephrase the sentence without one in such a way that it doesn't lose any meaning and still has a good flow, like you could imagine an everyday person saying it. For sentence structure, it can hinge a lot on personal preference. Granted, this is my preference, though I'm not going to force it on anyone, and I wouldn't require you to use my system to get onto EqD. My go-to sentences are the simple and compound. ("he dd this," "he did this, and she did that.") They're so common that they blend in, and they go by without notice until you've hit four or five in a row. The main thing is to keep them with varying lengths and to throw in a different structure every third or fourth sentences or so. And those others can be many things: dialogue, a stylistically used fragment, or placing an element other than the subject first, like having a dependent clause, participle, adverb, prepositional phrase, absolute phrase, or participial phrase up front. As a more unusual structure, these ones stand out more, so they get repetitive faster. Word choice works the same way. Which word would you notice more if it were used three times in a sentence, "the" or "antediluvian"?

>Finally, the point of the story and character growth.

I see that you did have some character growth, but it's so subdued as to be almost unnoticeable. You can have the nature of the growth be the same, but I'd advise making it a little more overt. As it is, it's unclear whether Pinkie learned anything or will do anything about it.

Any more questions? Feel free to reply.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129129" onclick="return highlight('129129', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129129">&gt;&gt;129129</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;writing her is a balance between subtlety and randomness, which probably can be jarring at times</span><br />Oh, I completely agree that Pinkie is capable of serious thought. But in canon, even when she <i>is</i> serious, she still has a rather playful way of talking about it. Take &quot;Party of One,&quot; for example, or when she was worried about Dash going off to the Wonderbolts Academy.<br /><br />Over those first few sentences, my concern wasn&#039;t so much what Pinkie was saying as how she was saying it. Those seemed to be much more formal and use word choices that I couldn&#039;t imagine for Pinkie.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With show vs. tell, I find it quite difficult to show.</span><br />In that section at the top of this thread, I go into some more of the devices that writers can use. It does take some experience before a writer develops a good sense of what is or isn&#039;t telly and when telling is okay. It&#039;s not all facial expression. There are other things you can do than a frown or a furrowed brow. Take other synonyms that have sightly different connotations than a frown, like a scowl or a grimace. But then there&#039;s a lot of other body language: fidgeting to imply restlessness or distraction, trudging or plodding to indicate many flavors of sadness… There&#039;s what they say and what speaking verbs you use. Just imagine observing a real person in a conversation or really doing anything. What are all the little things they do? That&#039;s what adds all the realism and subtext, and that&#039;s what removes the need to have the narrator outright say how the character feels. Imagine your character is in a play, and the stage director is about to send him out for his scene. What would the director tell him to do to communicate his character&#039;s mood to the audience?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Same kinda thing for sentence variation and &#039;to be&#039; verbs.</span><br />These aren&#039;t that difficult to do, either, but it does take some concentration to remain aware of it. For &quot;to be&quot; verbs, it really is just this simple: when you find yourself using one, see if you can rephrase the sentence without one in such a way that it doesn&#039;t lose any meaning and still has a good flow, like you could imagine an everyday person saying it. For sentence structure, it can hinge a lot on personal preference. Granted, this is my preference, though I&#039;m not going to force it on anyone, and I wouldn&#039;t require you to use my system to get onto EqD. My go-to sentences are the simple and compound. (&quot;he dd this,&quot; &quot;he did this, and she did that.&quot;) They&#039;re so common that they blend in, and they go by without notice until you&#039;ve hit four or five in a row. The main thing is to keep them with varying lengths and to throw in a different structure every third or fourth sentences or so. And those others can be many things: dialogue, a stylistically used fragment, or placing an element other than the subject first, like having a dependent clause, participle, adverb, prepositional phrase, absolute phrase, or participial phrase up front. As a more unusual structure, these ones stand out more, so they get repetitive faster. Word choice works the same way. Which word would you notice more if it were used three times in a sentence, &quot;the&quot; or &quot;antediluvian&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Finally, the point of the story and character growth.</span><br />I see that you did have some character growth, but it&#039;s so subdued as to be almost unnoticeable. You can have the nature of the growth be the same, but I&#039;d advise making it a little more overt. As it is, it&#039;s unclear whether Pinkie learned anything or will do anything about it.<br /><br />Any more questions? Feel free to reply.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Nov 16th, 2013 13:46</span></div><br/>

One Last Thing Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 40

>>129132
>>129132

Thanks for the quick and detailed response! It's kinda odd how it's inspired me to look for more reviews on my fics, but I suppose that's a good thing, eh?

I just have one last question, but if it's too much trouble, don't worry about it. But I would like to see what I did right. Seeing the stuff I did well will help me transition more smoothly into making all my stuff as good, if you catch my drift.

Thanks again!

-JaketheGinger<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129132" onclick="return highlight('129132', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129132">&gt;&gt;129132</a><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129132" onclick="return highlight('129132', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129132">&gt;&gt;129132</a><br /><br />Thanks for the quick and detailed response! It&#039;s kinda odd how it&#039;s inspired me to look for more reviews on my fics, but I suppose that&#039;s a good thing, eh?<br /><br />I just have one last question, but if it&#039;s too much trouble, don&#039;t worry about it. But I would like to see what I did <i>right</i>. Seeing the stuff I did well will help me transition more smoothly into making all my stuff as good, if you catch my drift.<br /><br />Thanks again!<br /><br />-JaketheGinger<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 41

>>129133
There's a lot that was done right. As I said, this story is pretty close to being postable, so it takes a lot less space to mark mistakes.

For one, you have a good sense of Pinkie's character. Her dialogue and narration were convincing. For another, you showed a good restraint in the story's emotions. Too many authors go over the top, and would have Pinkie bursting into tears when confronted with her weakness, but here, while it was still clear how the characters felt, it was a strong undercurrent instead of being pushed into the reader's face. And what most inexperienced writers don't realize is that this is the more powerful and realistic way to do it. I also didn't find much in the way of mechanical problems, which is always nice. While I think you need to do more with it, I liked the last part where Celestia was gently hinting to Pinkie and watching her pick it up. It was nicely constructed and subtle. It's kind of hard to work in anything other than generalities when pointing out what went right; if I saw a specific line I thought was wonderful, for example, I would have said so in the review, since it's essentially the notes I'm taking as I read.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129133" onclick="return highlight('129133', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129133">&gt;&gt;129133</a><br />There&#039;s a lot that was done right. As I said, this story is pretty close to being postable, so it takes a lot less space to mark mistakes.<br /><br />For one, you have a good sense of Pinkie&#039;s character. Her dialogue and narration were convincing. For another, you showed a good restraint in the story&#039;s emotions. Too many authors go over the top, and would have Pinkie bursting into tears when confronted with her weakness, but here, while it was still clear how the characters felt, it was a strong undercurrent instead of being pushed into the reader&#039;s face. And what most inexperienced writers don&#039;t realize is that this is the more powerful and realistic way to do it. I also didn&#039;t find much in the way of mechanical problems, which is always nice. While I think you need to do more with it, I liked the last part where Celestia was gently hinting to Pinkie and watching her pick it up. It was nicely constructed and subtle. It&#039;s kind of hard to work in anything other than generalities when pointing out what went right; if I saw a specific line I thought was wonderful, for example, I would have said so in the review, since it&#039;s essentially the notes I&#039;m taking as I read.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 42

I really found very few mechanical problems, so I'm not going to pick at those.

The writing was good here, and there were some good horror elements going on, but it needs a tune-up.

First, I'm not sure the journal format is doing anything for you. At least the entries are plausible for a journal, which is more than I can say for most such stories, but they're structured more for plot convenience than anything else. He doesn't write every day, and when he does, it's only to mention the specific things that tie directly to the plot and nothing else. Presuming that the character doesn't know what's needed for the plot, and that there are a lot of unnamed, everyday things going on in between, it loses some authenticity. This first-person narration is reminiscent of Lovecraft, but he was happy to have the narrator simply take us through the events, and didn't often rely on a gimmick like a journal. And he still had his characters relate things that were tangential to the main conflict, because that makes things realistic. They were important on that day, so he spoke of them. The fact that other things turned out to be more important in hindsight wouldn't have been known to him at the time. Where this really falls apart is the last entry. He wrote it while being pursued? I don't really see how he even had an opportunity to make that entry.

Next, horror is most effective when it's behind the scenes, affects the full spectrum of perception, and has a purpose. So, one at a time. Behind the scenes: Things are scarier when you don't see them. You actually did well with this—there's nothing blatant happening, so a lot is left to my imagination. However, in your climax, the faculty and students are all chasing the protagonist. You had this nice vague danger going on, and then things became a bit too concrete. The true force behind it all is still hidden, which is good, but that raises another issue. But first, the perception. It's too common to have horror focus on the visual, and to some degree, the auditory. Don't forget the wonderful mood-setting and eerieness you can achieve using touch, taste, and smell. Good horror makes a full assault on all the senses with subtle things that don't belong. And onto the third point, which pulls back the other issue I said I'd discuss in a moment. There needs to be a purpose. Having things hidden in the background is great, but that doesn't mean we should remain in the dark as to why things happen. We never get the slightest hint as to what is happening at this school. For all I know, they're covering for a meth lab. I have no sense of the nature of what's controlling everything, and I have no idea why this particular character was targeted. They sought him out as a math teacher. Why? Is that something they need? Or is he someone they wanted for another reason? When everything's aimless, it's like a random murder. While a horrible event, it lacks a sense of urgency.

Then, I'd urge you to provide me with more of an emotional response from our protagonist. He goes through these unsettling experiences, then rarely has little to say about how they made him feel, other than a token phrase. He's more concerned with listing facts and events. Now atmosphere can carry a story to some degree, and the aforementioned Lovecraft does have a tendency to create these rather stoic, detached narrators, and if that's really what you want to do , I can't say it's impossible. But you'd find it much easier to connect with a reader by doing so on an emotional level, rather than relying on the situation to carry the story by itself.

Finally, why is this a pony story? I could replace all of your characters with humans, make some extremely minor tweaks to the language, and we'd have a story that wasn't lacking in any context. A pony story should make use of the MLP universe in such a way that it's irrevocably (or at least by a substantial preponderance) rooted in that world. I have to say that this isn't tied into MLP strongly enough that I'd call it a no-doubt pony story.I really found very few mechanical problems, so I&#039;m not going to pick at those.<br /><br />The writing was good here, and there were some good horror elements going on, but it needs a tune-up.<br /><br />First, I&#039;m not sure the journal format is doing anything for you. At least the entries are plausible for a journal, which is more than I can say for most such stories, but they&#039;re structured more for plot convenience than anything else. He doesn&#039;t write every day, and when he does, it&#039;s only to mention the specific things that tie directly to the plot and nothing else. Presuming that the character doesn&#039;t know what&#039;s needed for the plot, and that there are a lot of unnamed, everyday things going on in between, it loses some authenticity. This first-person narration is reminiscent of Lovecraft, but he was happy to have the narrator simply take us through the events, and didn&#039;t often rely on a gimmick like a journal. And he still had his characters relate things that were tangential to the main conflict, because that makes things realistic. They were important on that day, so he spoke of them. The fact that other things turned out to be more important in hindsight wouldn&#039;t have been known to him at the time. Where this really falls apart is the last entry. He wrote it while being pursued? I don&#039;t really see how he even had an opportunity to make that entry.<br /><br />Next, horror is most effective when it&#039;s behind the scenes, affects the full spectrum of perception, and has a purpose. So, one at a time. Behind the scenes: Things are scarier when you <i>don&#039;t</i> see them. You actually did well with this—there&#039;s nothing blatant happening, so a lot is left to my imagination. However, in your climax, the faculty and students are all chasing the protagonist. You had this nice vague danger going on, and then things became a bit too concrete. The true force behind it all is still hidden, which is good, but that raises another issue. But first, the perception. It&#039;s too common to have horror focus on the visual, and to some degree, the auditory. Don&#039;t forget the wonderful mood-setting and eerieness you can achieve using touch, taste, and smell. Good horror makes a full assault on all the senses with subtle things that don&#039;t belong. And onto the third point, which pulls back the other issue I said I&#039;d discuss in a moment. There needs to be a purpose. Having things hidden in the background is great, but that doesn&#039;t mean we should remain in the dark as to <i>why</i> things happen. We never get the slightest hint as to what is happening at this school. For all I know, they&#039;re covering for a meth lab. I have no sense of the nature of what&#039;s controlling everything, and I have no idea why this particular character was targeted. They sought him out as a math teacher. Why? Is that something they need? Or is he someone they wanted for another reason? When everything&#039;s aimless, it&#039;s like a random murder. While a horrible event, it lacks a sense of urgency.<br /><br />Then, I&#039;d urge you to provide me with more of an emotional response from our protagonist. He goes through these unsettling experiences, then rarely has little to say about how they made him feel, other than a token phrase. He&#039;s more concerned with listing facts and events. Now atmosphere can carry a story to some degree, and the aforementioned Lovecraft does have a tendency to create these rather stoic, detached narrators, and if that&#039;s really what you want to do , I can&#039;t say it&#039;s impossible. But you&#039;d find it much easier to connect with a reader by doing so on an emotional level, rather than relying on the situation to carry the story by itself.<br /><br />Finally, why is this a pony story? I could replace all of your characters with humans, make some extremely minor tweaks to the language, and we&#039;d have a story that wasn&#039;t lacking in any context. A pony story should make use of the MLP universe in such a way that it&#039;s irrevocably (or at least by a substantial preponderance) rooted in that world. I have to say that this isn&#039;t tied into MLP strongly enough that I&#039;d call it a no-doubt pony story.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 43

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>he stammered//

It's generally best to avoid speech tags that are already evident from the speech itself. The one exception is "asked," since it's so common.

>Twilight's unwavering glare testing his resolve//

The story had seemed in Twilight's viewpoint until now, but the way this is phrased, it's not something she could know. You can make it something she knows by giving me the context she uses to draw that conclusion. By switching into the guard's perspective, you make the narrative choppy. They can be done, but have to be managed carefully. You should read the head-hopping section at the top of this thread.

>The guard looked around nervously.//

This is the first time I've caught you being telly, so maybe it's something you've got a good handle on, and if you don't do it much, it's okay. But you might need to read the show-versus-tell section at the top of this thread. Bottom line: I'd rather you paint a picture for me and get me to conclude he's nervous than just tell me that.

>your Highness//

The whole term is an honorific. Capitalize both words.

>the guard shook his head//

This is not a speaking action. It should be a separate sentence or paired with a speaking verb.

>Thank you for your time, guard//

The fact that she doesn't know his name makes her seem less than personable.

>The guard saluted and watched Twilight trot down the corridor.//

Now you're back in the guard's head again. It's only for one paragraph, and I don't get anything pertinent from it, so what's the point? It would help the story if you established a clear perspective.

>As she disappeared around a corner//

Missing a comma to set off this dependent clause.

>stepped aside to allow her access to the room//

This would work better if you had established their positions to start with. Now, I have to backtrack and place Luna in the doorway.

>elegantly//

There are a lot of ways this could look. Let me see what was in your head.

>Luna sat down on her haunches and watched as Twilight nervously chewed her lower lip, while counting the beads of sweat rolling down her brow.//

The last part is vaguely placed within the sentence. I can't tell who's sweating and who is counting.

>Twilight eventually broke the silence//

Again, this is not a speaking action.

>When I questioned him about it//

Another dependent clause that needs a comma.

>once straight//

This is used as a multi-word modifier, so hyphenate it.

>The battle was unfortunately lost and she chucked heartily//

See the section on comma usage with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>"Princess Celestia's own guards are using what could very well be a private nickname for her! Something needs to be done to stop them!"//

She sure is jumping to conclusions, especially given that Luna doesn't seem concerned.

>Choking back giggles she spoke as calmly as she could.//

This is a sentence fragment, and you haven't adopted a conversational tone for your narrator for which this would be appropriate.

>"That's exactly what I was thinking," Luna grinned.//

Those tags again. How do you grin a sentence?

>We will not let you down, you have our word.//

Comma splice. You have two sentences tacked together with a comma.

>Luna smiled at that//

Beware using demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns, since they have vague, broad antecedents and refer to the narration itself. Better to put an appropriate noun after it. The preceding couple lines of dialogue are also rather forced and unnatural. And finally, this is a very weak scene ending. It just kind of peters out without coming to any sort of conclusion or cliffhanger.

>Raising a forehoof//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>she knocked gently on the door a couple of times, and then pounded on it relentlessly//

Another "comma usage with conjunctions" problem, and we lack any context for why she changes her urgency here.

>The door was quickly opened, and a disgruntled Celestia//

There's no reason for the passive voice, and since this emotion is the crux of your story, I'd advise against bluntly telling it to me.

>mother or father gets you up, but since she's not here//

Mismatch (mother or father -> she) and missing comma.

>Twilight could only giggle in response as Luna continued her story.//

These very short scenes make the story choppy. If they're important, then make more happen in them, or they amount to little more than interruptions. If they're not important, then get rid of them.

>"My mind is racing with the many ways in which this could go wrong."//

Very unnatural dialogue.

>began its descent, paving the way for a new day to begin//

Watch word repetition within a close space.

>taking in a deep intake//

Redundant.

>she said sheepishly//

She just said something sheepishly a few paragraphs ago. And the deeper I get into the story, the more of these telly adverbs I see.

>"You will do… as… I… command!" She bellowed.//

Capitalization.

>Luna could only watch in silent awe as the sun slowly, and with some reluctance, began to make its ascent into the sky. Celestia continued to struggle as sweat gathered on her forehead, but she showed no signs of giving up the fight.//

You use quite a few of these "as" clauses. Particularly in places like this, where you have them in consecutive sentences, it can get repetitive.

>Luna rushed to her sisters side//

Missing apostrophe.

>Celestia looked at her flank, a crestfallen look//

More close repetition.

>her sisters face//

Another missing apostrophe.

>Perhaps your destiny was to get zapped by the sun and not raise it?//

I don't see how this explanation makes any more sense than assuming she got the nickname for raising the sun. Nothing about getting hit on the butt clicks as a more obvious explanation than simply being the location of her cutie mark. And you're not going to say why the sun did that? Luna does attempt a reason, but it's more whimsical and implies sentience on the sun's part, which is odd.

>I can only pray that she never finds out about the existence of 'Moonbutt'.//

Given that Luna knows why ponies assume Celestia is called Sunbutt, how can she not assume the same of herself?

>That is one particular tale that Celestia would be all too eager to tell.//

This doesn't quite fit with her "grumbling," since I can't see why it would make her angry.

Overall, there are a scattering of comma problems, invalid speaking verbs, and telly language that gets more prevalent the further I got into the story. The two absolute worst places to be telly are at the story's climax and at the beginning. At least you didn't so much at the beginning, which will help you snare more readers.

Second, you have a very inconsistent narrator. Having a truly objective one is fine, though it's often better in that case still to keep the viewpoint with a consistent character as much as possible, even if he doesn't adopt that character's voice and become more subjective. But your narrator keeps hovering over several characters and dipping lightly into their perspectives, which just ends up jerking the reader around.

Finally, this plays as a nice scene, but it's weak as a story. You don't play this information as any kind of conflict, and we don't see any character growth or get some insight into one of them as a result of reading it. Yes, Celestia has a minor struggle to get her cutie mark, but it's a foregone conclusion. So what is at stake exactly, and what bad thing would happen if the characters fail to achieve it. Or on the character side, how has one of them changed as a result of the experience?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he stammered//</span><br />It&#039;s generally best to avoid speech tags that are already evident from the speech itself. The one exception is &quot;asked,&quot; since it&#039;s so common.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight&#039;s unwavering glare testing his resolve//</span><br />The story had seemed in Twilight&#039;s viewpoint until now, but the way this is phrased, it&#039;s not something she could know. You can make it something she knows by giving me the context she uses to draw that conclusion. By switching into the guard&#039;s perspective, you make the narrative choppy. They can be done, but have to be managed carefully. You should read the head-hopping section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The guard looked around nervously.//</span><br />This is the first time I&#039;ve caught you being telly, so maybe it&#039;s something you&#039;ve got a good handle on, and if you don&#039;t do it much, it&#039;s okay. But you might need to read the show-versus-tell section at the top of this thread. Bottom line: I&#039;d rather you paint a picture for me and get me to conclude he&#039;s nervous than just tell me that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Highness//</span><br />The whole term is an honorific. Capitalize both words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the guard shook his head//</span><br />This is not a speaking action. It should be a separate sentence or paired with a speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thank you for your time, guard//</span><br />The fact that she doesn&#039;t know his name makes her seem less than personable.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The guard saluted and watched Twilight trot down the corridor.//</span><br />Now you&#039;re back in the guard&#039;s head again. It&#039;s only for one paragraph, and I don&#039;t get anything pertinent from it, so what&#039;s the point? It would help the story if you established a clear perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she disappeared around a corner//</span><br />Missing a comma to set off this dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stepped aside to allow her access to the room//</span><br />This would work better if you had established their positions to start with. Now, I have to backtrack and place Luna in the doorway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;elegantly//</span><br />There are a lot of ways this could look. Let me see what was in your head.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna sat down on her haunches and watched as Twilight nervously chewed her lower lip, while counting the beads of sweat rolling down her brow.//</span><br />The last part is vaguely placed within the sentence. I can&#039;t tell who&#039;s sweating and who is counting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight eventually broke the silence//</span><br />Again, this is not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I questioned him about it//</span><br />Another dependent clause that needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once straight//</span><br />This is used as a multi-word modifier, so hyphenate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The battle was unfortunately lost and she chucked heartily//</span><br />See the section on comma usage with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Princess Celestia&#039;s own guards are using what could very well be a private nickname for her! Something needs to be done to stop them!&quot;//</span><br />She sure is jumping to conclusions, especially given that Luna doesn&#039;t seem concerned.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Choking back giggles she spoke as calmly as she could.//</span><br />This is a sentence fragment, and you haven&#039;t adopted a conversational tone for your narrator for which this would be appropriate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;That&#039;s exactly what I was thinking,&quot; Luna grinned.//</span><br />Those tags again. How do you grin a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We will not let you down, you have our word.//</span><br />Comma splice. You have two sentences tacked together with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna smiled at that//</span><br />Beware using demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns, since they have vague, broad antecedents and refer to the narration itself. Better to put an appropriate noun after it. The preceding couple lines of dialogue are also rather forced and unnatural. And finally, this is a very weak scene ending. It just kind of peters out without coming to any sort of conclusion or cliffhanger.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Raising a forehoof//</span><br />Set off participial phrases with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she knocked gently on the door a couple of times, and then pounded on it relentlessly//</span><br />Another &quot;comma usage with conjunctions&quot; problem, and we lack any context for why she changes her urgency here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The door was quickly opened, and a disgruntled Celestia//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason for the passive voice, and since this emotion is the crux of your story, I&#039;d advise against bluntly telling it to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mother or father gets you up, but since she&#039;s not here//</span><br />Mismatch (mother or father -&gt; she) and missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight could only giggle in response as Luna continued her story.//</span><br />These very short scenes make the story choppy. If they&#039;re important, then make more happen in them, or they amount to little more than interruptions. If they&#039;re not important, then get rid of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;My mind is racing with the many ways in which this could go wrong.&quot;//</span><br />Very unnatural dialogue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;began its descent, paving the way for a new day to begin//</span><br />Watch word repetition within a close space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taking in a deep intake//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she said sheepishly//</span><br />She just said something sheepishly a few paragraphs ago. And the deeper I get into the story, the more of these telly adverbs I see.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;You will do… as… I… command!&quot; She bellowed.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna could only watch in silent awe as the sun slowly, and with some reluctance, began to make its ascent into the sky. Celestia continued to struggle as sweat gathered on her forehead, but she showed no signs of giving up the fight.//</span><br />You use quite a few of these &quot;as&quot; clauses. Particularly in places like this, where you have them in consecutive sentences, it can get repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna rushed to her sisters side//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia looked at her flank, a crestfallen look//</span><br />More close repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her sisters face//</span><br />Another missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Perhaps your destiny was to get zapped by the sun and not raise it?//</span><br />I don&#039;t see how this explanation makes any more sense than assuming she got the nickname for raising the sun. Nothing about getting hit on the butt clicks as a more obvious explanation than simply being the location of her cutie mark. And you&#039;re not going to say why the sun did that? Luna does attempt a reason, but it&#039;s more whimsical and implies sentience on the sun&#039;s part, which is odd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can only pray that she never finds out about the existence of &#039;Moonbutt&#039;.//</span><br />Given that Luna knows why ponies assume Celestia is called Sunbutt, how can she not assume the same of herself?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That is one particular tale that Celestia would be all too eager to tell.//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t quite fit with her &quot;grumbling,&quot; since I can&#039;t see why it would make her angry.<br /><br />Overall, there are a scattering of comma problems, invalid speaking verbs, and telly language that gets more prevalent the further I got into the story. The two absolute worst places to be telly are at the story&#039;s climax and at the beginning. At least you didn&#039;t so much at the beginning, which will help you snare more readers.<br /><br />Second, you have a very inconsistent narrator. Having a truly objective one is fine, though it&#039;s often better in that case still to keep the viewpoint with a consistent character as much as possible, even if he doesn&#039;t adopt that character&#039;s voice and become more subjective. But your narrator keeps hovering over several characters and dipping lightly into their perspectives, which just ends up jerking the reader around.<br /><br />Finally, this plays as a nice scene, but it&#039;s weak as a story. You don&#039;t play this information as any kind of conflict, and we don&#039;t see any character growth or get some insight into one of them as a result of reading it. Yes, Celestia has a minor struggle to get her cutie mark, but it&#039;s a foregone conclusion. So what is at stake exactly, and what bad thing would happen if the characters fail to achieve it. Or on the character side, how has one of them changed as a result of the experience?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 44

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:

Why is this all in italics? I don't see the purpose. Italics make things stand out and if everything stands out, nothing does.

Story:

>When Fluttershy moved to stand up//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>labcoat//

lab coat

>harsh chemical light//

That would be very unusual to have a chemical light, as they don't last very long. While I'd bet you meant that in a more figurative sense, it still struck me as odd.

>she pawed at the floor with one of her hooves, looking everywhere but at the strange stallion//

She hasn't gotten up yet, so how are her hooves on the ground? If she's seated, maybe a back hoof is, but "pawed" often connotes a forehoof. Also watch your misplaced modifiers, participles in particular. By their proximity, it sounds like the hooves are looking everywhere.

>tiled surfaces//

You already mentioned the "tiled walls." Watch the repetition.

>Don’t worry Fluttershy.//

Missing comma for direct address.

>her cheeks flushing red in embarrassment//

There's a section on show-versus-tell at the top of this thread, and it talks about this kind of telling. We already get embarrassment from the flushed cheeks. Telling us it's embarrassment is redundant and lacks any subtlety.

>“S-Sorry!” she apologized//

You only capitalize the first one, unless it's a proper noun. And it's best to avoid speaking verbs that are aready obvious from the speech itself, including such gems as "trailed off," "interrupted," "stammered," and "apologized" here. Notable exceptions are more common ones like "asked," "shouted," "yelled," and so on.

>He nodded in understand//

Verb form, but again, this is telly and unnecessary.

>off the floor//

Oh, okay. She was on the floor the whole time. The "pawing" thing makes more sense now (though I still think it's odd the have a hoof "paw"), but you should make her position clear much earlier in the story.

>She blinked at him a few times before smiling.//

A couple of things here. First, she goes through a lot of dialogue about her animals here, but aside from this little bit, you don't touch on how she feels about any of it. Is she saying it in a monotone, like it's all rote to her? Is she beaming and clutching her hooves to her chest like she's lost in a reverie? Is she frowning, like it's all become a chore? Get at her emotions. Second, your narrator had been down in Fluttersy's head before. He said things that only she knows internally, so he was in her mindset. Yet here, where she should be getting emotional, that narrator keeps a curious distance from her. It kind of left me scratching my head as to what you want this narrator to be. He's closely attached to her when the more mundane things happen, but backs away when emotions set in? You'd typically see the opposite, or else have him in her perspective constantly.

>hum of the air conditioning//

How does this feel? Fanfics too often focus only on what can be seen or heard. This would be a nice touch for one of the neglected senses.

>The cold, empty room//

If it's already cold, why is the air conditioning running?

>T-There//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Surely "Th-there." And again, only capitalize the first, unless there's some other reason the word would need to be capitalized. You do this a lot.

>She flinched. “Yes,” whispered Fluttershy, eyes clenched tight against the harsh memory.//

There you go. Now you're getting more at her emotions. Depending on what kind of narrator you want, you could even forge a closer connection by using some indirect thought.

>T-Then//

Th-then

>the steady click like a metronome underscoring Fluttershy’s muffled cries//

Here's another way to consider your narrative viewpoint. If the narrator is with Fluttershy, would she even notice this while she's "wracked with her violent sobs"? Possibly, but just mentioning it casually like this doesn't quite work. Consider how she'd perceive it.

>to scream at his uncaring tone, to berate him for showing no concern for those animals that had been murdered right in front of her//

See, you're decidedly in Fluttershy's head here. Yet she showed no such reaction when he said these things. We're getting it after the fact, which decouples it an distances the reader from your character's emotions.

>s-shut//

Last one I'm going to mark. A lot of your hyphenations need correction for capitalized letters and what the repeated sound would actually be.

>cold patch of numbness//

If it's numb, how does it feel cold?

>elements of harmony//

We usually see this capitalized, but it's your call.

>He froze still//

Redundant.

>She let herself lay back down on the tiles//

Confusion of "lay" and "lie."

> if I could just take nap//

Missing word.

>A pegasus by the name of…” He checked his notes. “Rainbow Dash?”//

What you've written here isn't wrong, but a more common way of having a narrative interruption in speech is like this:
A pegasus by the name of—” he checked his notes “—Rainbow Dash?”
Or have the dashes outside the quotes if the speech doesn't actually stop for the action.

>as her friend’s smiling visage filling her thoughts//

Verb form error.

>She spat out a something//

Syntax.

>He pressed himself up against wall she drew closer//

More syntax problems.

>a pneumatic sigh that was lost beneath the cacophony made by her hoof banging away on the polished steel//

Again, what's her perception? The narrator is in her head, so when you say she couldn't hear it, then the narrator can't, either.

Overall, the few consistent mechanical problems are actually easy fixes. Just mind what I said about your narrative voice. It really was distracting when you switched between objective and subjective viewpoints in a flash and in counterintuitive ways.

Now, I saw your big reveal coming a mile off, at least in a way. I wouldn't have been surprised to see her as a werewolf or zombie, either. It may be that you need to keep it hidden better, but that's a very subjective thing. No matter how well you obscure it, though, someone will just have a moment of insight or make a lucky guess, and maybe it's just my turn for that.

Lastly, something about Fluttershy's situation didn't ring true. By the plant matter that's part of her, I take it that the strange timberwolf didn't just start a new creature by attacking her, but actually incorporated itself into her. But what about it made her dominant? Before, it was more than just the wolf, but the whole acted like the wolf. Why did Fluttershy become the part in control? In some ways, both the wolf and Fluttershy acted not quite like themselves, like they were at least experiencing some influence from their other parts. Again, if the wolf was able to maintain control still, why not when Fluttershy was added? But more to the point, Fluttershy's lapses out of her normal mindset are quite vague. It might do better if she exhibited specific traits of her other parts at times, like she followed the thought processes of a wolf at one point, or briefly took on Applejack's voice. This would have to be managed carefully to keep it effective, of course, and would probably prevent you from hiding your reveal until late, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Keeping Dash and AJ out of it until near the end would be a good idea, but the rest could be played either way. This is not a requirement, of course—I'm just trying to brainstorm a bit to see what else might make this a more effective story.

Another tip for horror, and one I touched on already, is not to neglect any of the senses. Good horror also includes odd physical sensations, smells, tastes, things that are just a little out of place and getting consistently more unsettling.

This wasn't badly written; really, the narrative quirks and resulting emotional distance from Fluttershy were the big issues. Fix those up, and you could have a nice story here.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><br />Why is this all in italics? I don&#039;t see the purpose. Italics make things stand out and if everything stands out, nothing does.<br /><br />Story:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When Fluttershy moved to stand up//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;labcoat//</span><br />lab coat<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;harsh chemical light//</span><br />That would be very unusual to have a chemical light, as they don&#039;t last very long. While I&#039;d bet you meant that in a more figurative sense, it still struck me as odd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she pawed at the floor with one of her hooves, looking everywhere but at the strange stallion//</span><br />She hasn&#039;t gotten up yet, so how are her hooves on the ground? If she&#039;s seated, maybe a back hoof is, but &quot;pawed&quot; often connotes a forehoof. Also watch your misplaced modifiers, participles in particular. By their proximity, it sounds like the hooves are looking everywhere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tiled surfaces//</span><br />You already mentioned the &quot;tiled walls.&quot; Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t worry Fluttershy.//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her cheeks flushing red in embarrassment//</span><br />There&#039;s a section on show-versus-tell at the top of this thread, and it talks about this kind of telling. We already get embarrassment from the flushed cheeks. Telling us it&#039;s embarrassment is redundant and lacks any subtlety.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“S-Sorry!” she apologized//</span><br />You only capitalize the first one, unless it&#039;s a proper noun. And it&#039;s best to avoid speaking verbs that are aready obvious from the speech itself, including such gems as &quot;trailed off,&quot; &quot;interrupted,&quot; &quot;stammered,&quot; and &quot;apologized&quot; here. Notable exceptions are more common ones like &quot;asked,&quot; &quot;shouted,&quot; &quot;yelled,&quot; and so on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He nodded in understand//</span><br />Verb form, but again, this is telly and unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;off the floor//</span><br />Oh, okay. She was on the floor the whole time. The &quot;pawing&quot; thing makes more sense now (though I still think it&#039;s odd the have a hoof &quot;paw&quot;), but you should make her position clear much earlier in the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She blinked at him a few times before smiling.//</span><br />A couple of things here. First, she goes through a lot of dialogue about her animals here, but aside from this little bit, you don&#039;t touch on how she feels about any of it. Is she saying it in a monotone, like it&#039;s all rote to her? Is she beaming and clutching her hooves to her chest like she&#039;s lost in a reverie? Is she frowning, like it&#039;s all become a chore? Get at her emotions. Second, your narrator had been down in Fluttersy&#039;s head before. He said things that only she knows internally, so he was in her mindset. Yet here, where she should be getting emotional, that narrator keeps a curious distance from her. It kind of left me scratching my head as to what you want this narrator to be. He&#039;s closely attached to her when the more mundane things happen, but backs away when emotions set in? You&#039;d typically see the opposite, or else have him in her perspective constantly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hum of the air conditioning//</span><br />How does this feel? Fanfics too often focus only on what can be seen or heard. This would be a nice touch for one of the neglected senses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The cold, empty room//</span><br />If it&#039;s already cold, why is the air conditioning running?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-There//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Surely &quot;Th-there.&quot; And again, only capitalize the first, unless there&#039;s some other reason the word would need to be capitalized. You do this a lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She flinched. “Yes,” whispered Fluttershy, eyes clenched tight against the harsh memory.//</span><br />There you go. Now you&#039;re getting more at her emotions. Depending on what kind of narrator you want, you could even forge a closer connection by using some indirect thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-Then//</span><br />Th-then<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the steady click like a metronome underscoring Fluttershy’s muffled cries//</span><br />Here&#039;s another way to consider your narrative viewpoint. If the narrator is with Fluttershy, would she even notice this while she&#039;s &quot;wracked with her violent sobs&quot;? Possibly, but just mentioning it casually like this doesn&#039;t quite work. Consider how she&#039;d perceive it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to scream at his uncaring tone, to berate him for showing no concern for those animals that had been murdered right in front of her//</span><br />See, you&#039;re decidedly in Fluttershy&#039;s head here. Yet she showed no such reaction when he said these things. We&#039;re getting it after the fact, which decouples it an distances the reader from your character&#039;s emotions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;s-shut//</span><br />Last one I&#039;m going to mark. A lot of your hyphenations need correction for capitalized letters and what the repeated sound would actually be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cold patch of numbness//</span><br />If it&#039;s numb, how does it feel cold?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;elements of harmony//</span><br />We usually see this capitalized, but it&#039;s your call.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He froze still//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She let herself lay back down on the tiles//</span><br />Confusion of &quot;lay&quot; and &quot;lie.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; if I could just take nap//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A pegasus by the name of…” He checked his notes. “Rainbow Dash?”//</span><br />What you&#039;ve written here isn&#039;t wrong, but a more common way of having a narrative interruption in speech is like this:<br />A pegasus by the name of—” he checked his notes “—Rainbow Dash?”<br />Or have the dashes outside the quotes if the speech doesn&#039;t actually stop for the action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as her friend’s smiling visage filling her thoughts//</span><br />Verb form error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She spat out a something//</span><br />Syntax.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He pressed himself up against wall she drew closer//</span><br />More syntax problems.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a pneumatic sigh that was lost beneath the cacophony made by her hoof banging away on the polished steel//</span><br />Again, what&#039;s her perception? The narrator is in her head, so when you say she couldn&#039;t hear it, then the narrator can&#039;t, either.<br /><br />Overall, the few consistent mechanical problems are actually easy fixes. Just mind what I said about your narrative voice. It really was distracting when you switched between objective and subjective viewpoints in a flash and in counterintuitive ways.<br /><br />Now, I saw your big reveal coming a mile off, at least in a way. I wouldn&#039;t have been surprised to see her as a werewolf or zombie, either. It may be that you need to keep it hidden better, but that&#039;s a very subjective thing. No matter how well you obscure it, though, someone will just have a moment of insight or make a lucky guess, and maybe it&#039;s just my turn for that.<br /><br />Lastly, something about Fluttershy&#039;s situation didn&#039;t ring true. By the plant matter that&#039;s part of her, I take it that the strange timberwolf didn&#039;t just start a new creature by attacking her, but actually incorporated itself into her. But what about it made her dominant? Before, it was more than just the wolf, but the whole acted like the wolf. Why did Fluttershy become the part in control? In some ways, both the wolf and Fluttershy acted not quite like themselves, like they were at least experiencing some influence from their other parts. Again, if the wolf was able to maintain control still, why not when Fluttershy was added? But more to the point, Fluttershy&#039;s lapses out of her normal mindset are quite vague. It might do better if she exhibited specific traits of her other parts at times, like she followed the thought processes of a wolf at one point, or briefly took on Applejack&#039;s voice. This would have to be managed carefully to keep it effective, of course, and would probably prevent you from hiding your reveal until late, but that&#039;s not necessarily a bad thing. Keeping Dash and AJ out of it until near the end would be a good idea, but the rest could be played either way. This is not a requirement, of course—I&#039;m just trying to brainstorm a bit to see what else might make this a more effective story.<br /><br />Another tip for horror, and one I touched on already, is not to neglect any of the senses. Good horror also includes odd physical sensations, smells, tastes, things that are just a little out of place and getting consistently more unsettling.<br /><br />This wasn&#039;t badly written; really, the narrative quirks and resulting emotional distance from Fluttershy were the big issues. Fix those up, and you could have a nice story here.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 45

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>You might wanna call it a benefit//

It's generally not a good idea to address the reader, unless you're writing second-person.

>I jerk upright to great protest of my back.//

Missing word.

>Disoriented and confused//

Participles and participial phrases are usually set off with commas.

>all too familiar//

Hyphenate most multi-word phrases used as a single descriptor.

>After being done with my morning toilet//

British writer, I presume? This isn't a usage you hear much in American English, particularly not from a southerner like Applejack.

>living on Sweet Apple Acres

I've only ever seen this phrased with "in."

>It's the news: //

A fine point, but it's best to have a subjective narrator stick pretty close to the focus character's diction and intelligence level, and this is required for a first-person narrator. Bottom line: Applejack doesn't seem the type to use colons. A few wouldn't stick out much, but you use quite a few, relatively speaking, and it just creates a distance from the character, because it doesn't feel right for her.

>Flim Flam Brother's//

Brothers', yes?

>Anyway, the buffet is up and I get myself some cereal and a cup of coffee.//

See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>I just don't like them rolls they have here, I liked the ones we had back home better…//

Comma splice.

>cause//

Missing the leading apostrophe (and beware smart quotes, which will try to draw it in the wrong direction). I could see spelling it without the apostrophe if it was something she'd written, but you shouldn't assume the error in speech.

>Darn AJ,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address requires commas on both sides.

>the big shed in the back of the building had blow over last night//

Verb form.

>Everytime//

In this usage, it should be two words.

>pouring over bills//

poring

>It's been laying here

Lay/lie confusion.

>handwriting//

Perhaps just call it writing or script instead of the more pony hoofwriting or mouthwriting.

>cutiemark crusader's//

Cutie Mark Crusaders'

>Me, wringing out my hair like a wet rag//

No reason to capitalize that.

>Big Mac leaning on a fence bathed in the light of an orange sundown, a straw casually hangin’ from his mouth, gazing into space.//

Participles are common violators of misplaced modifiers. They like to describe the nearest prior object, but take your "gazing into space" phrase. You have to wade back through "mouth" (which it would seem to modify), "straw," "sundown," "light," and "fence" before getting to the correct one. It's jus awkwardly placed.

>When I had a grip on myself again//

Another comma needed for a dependent clause.

>O.K.//

Spell out "okay."

>Zap apple//

If you're going to capitalize "Zap," you should probably do so with "apple" as well.

>taking the mickey out of//

Is this a British expression? I've never heard it before, but more to the point, it's not a southern one that Applejack could be expected to know.

>‘em//

I warned you about this once. The smart quotes have assumed something else and bent the apostrophe the wrong way. You have a number of these.

>on that picture//

in

>a sharp sting in my neck tells me he didn't like the angle I fell asleep in//

She refers to her neck as a "he"?

>lung full//

In this sense, "lungful."

>Back on Sweet Apple Acres//

More normal would be "at."

>slowlz//

Typo

>old chap//

Yeah, a southerner isn't going to say that.

>I didn’t notice I’ve been holding//

Just so you know, the "X I didn't even know I'd been Y-ing" is a very cliched phrasing.

I'm really on the fence about this. It's well-written, and a stark portrayal of someone feeling like she's outlived her usefulness. My only reservations are that it doesn't develop in any way. There's no conflict in the story and no character growth to speak of, the two standard ways of keeping up interest for the reader. We do gain some insight into Applejack, but it's a static thing. First off, that means it doesn't build to much of a climax. Particularly through the memories that Applejack goes through when looking at her photo album, we get more of an accounting of her life in list fashion. It's very factual. If she had more of an emotional response to each of these memories, it would connect the character and the reader better. As it is, it comes across fairly sterile. Second, what building it does just keeps ramping up the tragedy. This is what I refer to as "piling on." We begin with an elderly Applejack feeling sorry for herself. Then we get that she feels like a burden and a source of guilt for Twilight. Then we get a hint that Apple Bloom has some hidden regret about the situation, then we learn that Big Mac had a rather undignified fate, and end up with Applejack feeling suicidal. Things just keep getting worse. Sure some real-life situations are just like this. But not all, and not even most.

My advice on this front is twofold. Only include the amount of tragedy that you have to include. How much is necessary to get your point across and set up the plot? Use that and no more. Any needless tear-jerking you add on top of that is a pointless grab for the reader's heartstrings. Yes, it works on a fair number of readers, but it's not good practice, and those that can recognize it for what it is will often be resentful of the emotional manipulation. Is it necessary for Apple Bloom to harbor some hidden regrets? Is it necessary for Big Mac's life to follow that course? I don't think eliminating either one would alter the story appreciably. The other point, which is related, is that sadness works best by contrast. If you intersperse happy moments in the sad, then the sad stands out much more. You do go through some happy times in the photo album, but go back to my point about most of the story just being a slow escalation of tragedies. A reader gets numb to it. So instead of giving Big Mac yet another ugly turn, have Applejack rejoice in his pleasant waning years, for instance. It would also lend credence to her current state of despair that even those happy memories couldn't buoy her mood. Just a suggestion, but it illustrates my point.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You might wanna call it a benefit//</span><br />It&#039;s generally not a good idea to address the reader, unless you&#039;re writing second-person.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I jerk upright to great protest of my back.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Disoriented and confused//</span><br />Participles and participial phrases are usually set off with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all too familiar//</span><br />Hyphenate most multi-word phrases used as a single descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After being done with my morning toilet//</span><br />British writer, I presume? This isn&#039;t a usage you hear much in American English, particularly not from a southerner like Applejack.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;living on Sweet Apple Acres</span><br />I&#039;ve only ever seen this phrased with &quot;in.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s the news: //</span><br />A fine point, but it&#039;s best to have a subjective narrator stick pretty close to the focus character&#039;s diction and intelligence level, and this is required for a first-person narrator. Bottom line: Applejack doesn&#039;t seem the type to use colons. A few wouldn&#039;t stick out much, but you use quite a few, relatively speaking, and it just creates a distance from the character, because it doesn&#039;t feel right for her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Flim Flam Brother&#039;s//</span><br />Brothers&#039;, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Anyway, the buffet is up and I get myself some cereal and a cup of coffee.//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I just don&#039;t like them rolls they have here, I liked the ones we had back home better…//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cause//</span><br />Missing the leading apostrophe (and beware smart quotes, which will try to draw it in the wrong direction). I could see spelling it without the apostrophe if it was something she&#039;d written, but you shouldn&#039;t assume the error in speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Darn AJ,//</span><br />In the middle of a sentence, direct address requires commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the big shed in the back of the building had blow over last night//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everytime//</span><br />In this usage, it should be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pouring over bills//</span><br />poring<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s been laying here</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;handwriting//</span><br />Perhaps just call it writing or script instead of the more pony hoofwriting or mouthwriting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cutiemark crusader&#039;s//</span><br />Cutie Mark Crusaders&#039;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Me, wringing out my hair like a wet rag//</span><br />No reason to capitalize that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Big Mac leaning on a fence bathed in the light of an orange sundown, a straw casually hangin’ from his mouth, gazing into space.//</span><br />Participles are common violators of misplaced modifiers. They like to describe the nearest prior object, but take your &quot;gazing into space&quot; phrase. You have to wade back through &quot;mouth&quot; (which it would seem to modify), &quot;straw,&quot; &quot;sundown,&quot; &quot;light,&quot; and &quot;fence&quot; before getting to the correct one. It&#039;s jus awkwardly placed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I had a grip on myself again//</span><br />Another comma needed for a dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;O.K.//</span><br />Spell out &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Zap apple//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to capitalize &quot;Zap,&quot; you should probably do so with &quot;apple&quot; as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taking the mickey out of//</span><br />Is this a British expression? I&#039;ve never heard it before, but more to the point, it&#039;s not a southern one that Applejack could be expected to know.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />I warned you about this once. The smart quotes have assumed something else and bent the apostrophe the wrong way. You have a number of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on that picture//</span><br />in<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a sharp sting in my neck tells me he didn&#039;t like the angle I fell asleep in//</span><br />She refers to her neck as a &quot;he&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lung full//</span><br />In this sense, &quot;lungful.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Back on Sweet Apple Acres//</span><br />More normal would be &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;slowlz//</span><br />Typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;old chap//</span><br />Yeah, a southerner isn&#039;t going to say that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn’t notice I’ve been holding//</span><br />Just so you know, the &quot;X I didn&#039;t even know I&#039;d been Y-ing&quot; is a very cliched phrasing.<br /><br />I&#039;m really on the fence about this. It&#039;s well-written, and a stark portrayal of someone feeling like she&#039;s outlived her usefulness. My only reservations are that it doesn&#039;t develop in any way. There&#039;s no conflict in the story and no character growth to speak of, the two standard ways of keeping up interest for the reader. We do gain some insight into Applejack, but it&#039;s a static thing. First off, that means it doesn&#039;t build to much of a climax. Particularly through the memories that Applejack goes through when looking at her photo album, we get more of an accounting of her life in list fashion. It&#039;s very factual. If she had more of an emotional response to each of these memories, it would connect the character and the reader better. As it is, it comes across fairly sterile. Second, what building it does just keeps ramping up the tragedy. This is what I refer to as &quot;piling on.&quot; We begin with an elderly Applejack feeling sorry for herself. Then we get that she feels like a burden and a source of guilt for Twilight. Then we get a hint that Apple Bloom has some hidden regret about the situation, then we learn that Big Mac had a rather undignified fate, and end up with Applejack feeling suicidal. Things just keep getting worse. Sure some real-life situations are just like this. But not all, and not even most.<br /><br />My advice on this front is twofold. Only include the amount of tragedy that you have to include. How much is necessary to get your point across and set up the plot? Use that and no more. Any needless tear-jerking you add on top of that is a pointless grab for the reader&#039;s heartstrings. Yes, it works on a fair number of readers, but it&#039;s not good practice, and those that can recognize it for what it is will often be resentful of the emotional manipulation. Is it necessary for Apple Bloom to harbor some hidden regrets? Is it necessary for Big Mac&#039;s life to follow that course? I don&#039;t think eliminating either one would alter the story appreciably. The other point, which is related, is that sadness works best by contrast. If you intersperse happy moments in the sad, then the sad stands out much more. You do go through some happy times in the photo album, but go back to my point about most of the story just being a slow escalation of tragedies. A reader gets numb to it. So instead of giving Big Mac yet another ugly turn, have Applejack rejoice in his pleasant waning years, for instance. It would also lend credence to her current state of despair that even those happy memories couldn&#039;t buoy her mood. Just a suggestion, but it illustrates my point.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Dec 3rd, 2013 17:45</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 46

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The synopsis is rather dull. It makes zero indication as to what the story is about.

The introduction is already striking me as odd. It plays at a frame story and addresses the reader directly.

>After all, I lived in a library for my whole life.//

Well, no, before he moved to Ponyville, he presumably lived in Twilight's room in the castle (though Faust's headcanon had him raised by Celestia for part of that time while Twilight was younger).

>That’s the name of my mother, by the way.//

This feels out of place in a written medium. It;s more the kind of thing he'd say in person, not write down once he's had time to collect his thoughts, so it comes across as inauthentic.

>Dragon eggs weren’t exact an easy resource to come by//

Typo.

>Most of my early years in Canterlot with her were spent helping her organize things, and keeping her company since her family couldn’t visit her often.//

See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. I saw a number of these throughout the story.

>Heh…//

Again, this comes across as weirdly informal for something that we know is recorded as a story.

>she was grateful to have somepony //

Fine point here, and I know he's used this term in canon, but since he's including himself, would he use the "pony" version, particularly considering that he's (presumably) quite a bit older now?

>half finished//

Hyphenate your multi-word terms that act as a single modifier. You do this several times.

>Twilight had giggled. I just refused to say anything//

Mixing tenses.

>sweating//

A reptile?

>Nothing’s wrong Twilight!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>lept//

leapt

>lying in the corner//

You could just cut this "lying" out, particularly since you just used it very soon before, even though it was in a different sense.

>knowing that I had done wrong//

Most participles will be set off with a comma.

>or hours for teleportation//

How would that take hours?

>I was her closest and only friend after all.//

By now, I'm noticing that you use "after all" quite often.

>ordinary routine//

Somewhat redundant.

>For years I tried to get her to talk to ponies, trying to coax her to come to parties or hang out with some of my friends, but she always declined.//

Misplaced modifier. It sounds like "ponies" are trying to coax her. And repetition of "try."

>That was the day that I first discovered that//

Might want to rephrase. 3 instances of "that" in 9 words.

>That was why I was so excited when Princess Celestia gave her a new assignment as her star pupil: to go to Ponyville and make a few friends.//

Look how far the material after the colon is from what it's clarifying.

>R-rarity//

It's a proper noun, so both instances should be capitalized.

>“You didn’t want to crush me. I understand.” I stood up and simply shook my head, turning to leave. “Don’t worry, Rarity. I don’t hate you. I’m not even angry. I’m just thankful that you let me know.”

This situation is sure resolved quickly. You build it up as if it's some big thing, then it's over very quickly and with no fanfare. If he wants to brush it off because it's not the main point of what he has to say, fine, but he needs to indicate that, if it's the case.

>the Carousel Boutique//

You don't need "the" when using specific names. You go to the store, but you go to Wal-Mart.

>I just went straight to my bed and laid down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Twilight would be right there//

How did Twilight not know that Rarity was already in a relationship? That's certainly the type of thing that girls share, and Rarity had no apparent motivation to keep it secret.

>her eyes shining with sadness, but also pride

I can give you a pass when Spike talks about himself this way. But it's a bad idea to have him be telly when he's speaking about other characters.

>hard working//

One word.

>gentlecoltly//

Again, this isn't a word I would typically think of as applied to a dragon. Yes, Twilight would be used to using this word, but I also think she'd be sensitive enough to have an awareness of it.

>animals, and Pinkie//

Extraneous space.

>Fluttershy had opened a clinic in Canterlot to help sick and injured animals//

Given that animals would be more prevalent in a rural area, why would she do this?

>if you’re a species that lives longer like I am//

It'd sound smoother if the "like referred to the thing closest to it ("lives longer," not "species"): if you’re a species that lives longer like I do.

>That’s probably the one that stands by the most.//

Did you mean "stands out"?

>Being forced to stop moving…//

I'm also going to say that all the ellipses also are out of place, since this is supposed to be something that Spike has written. They indicate half-formed thoughts that peter out, and while this occurs in conversation, a writer has as long as he likes to sort out what he wants to write. They can serve occasionally to imply further information, but they're really a spoken thing more than a written thing.

>Spikey wikey//

The whole thing's a nickname. Capitalize both words.

>She laid back//

Lay/lie confusion again. "Lie/lay/had lain" takes no direct object, "lay/laid/had laid" does take one. You lie down, and you lay your head down.

>trying to reach up and get something by her bedside, in the nightstand that lay next to her//

There's no reason for that comma.

>together, smiling and having fun together//

Repetitive.

>I figure it’s what she would have wanted.//

Really? Maybe it's just me, but I figure she'd want to go out in a spectacular crash while trying a very dangerous trick.

>And then Daring Do put her whip and hat on her coat rack, sitting on her office chair.//

Sounds like the coat rack is sitting on the chair.

>she laid there in her chair//

Lay/lie again.

>a clear night’s sky//

Just use "night."

Now for a session of point/counterpoint.

Against your story is that it's a pretty common setup, particularly since it goes through the deaths of all 6 friends, even though it only lingers on two of them. It's become somewhat of a cliche to include all six and give special weight to the last of the group. It's also a bit weak on the conflict/growth front. There's no make-or-break moment where Spike must make a decision that will affect his future. There's nothing at stake. We don't see anything fundamental change about him as a character.

For your story is that you barely mentioned four of the deaths, so it's not an ad nauseam collation of their final moments. The writing is pretty good, and you actually have a good setup for a decisive moment on Spike's part. Ask yourself: What about Twilight's death changes Spike? Show the after in stark contrast to the before, when he comes to some realization. He does have a subtle one, choosing to be happy about the time he shared with them. And then you mention subsequent Elements. Did he befriend them all? And what does he do with this newfound happiness? Volunteer as a docent at their memorials so he can teach generations about their accomplishments? Read Daring Do stories to children at the library? This probably isn't the kind of story that will show clear conflict, but I'd like to see something along the lines of concrete character growth.

Lastly, I'll reiterate the issue of the narrator's voice, insofar as this is supposed to be something Spike has written. It relies on a lot of conversational conceits, and thus loses the feel of something he's taken the time to write. It may actually be wiser to remove that and just have him narrate as if he's speaking, but then it'd be more important not to have him address the reader.

There were certain words I saw turn up a lot. "Sad" made 18 entries, which doesn't sound like a lot, but if you look at where they occur, you use them in clumps, which only makes them sound more repetitive. "That" appears 130 times. It really stuck out, and suggests you're relying on its use as the start of noun clauses too much and using repetitive sentence formulations as a result. It's actually quite common to remove it as a conjunction leading off a noun clause, so you could take care of a fair number that way. "Was" shows up 114 times, and I suspect other forms of that verb also make themselves known frequently. That's a verb writers can stand to do without, to a large degree. There are 38 instances of "just," and like "sad," they tend to occur in clumps.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />The synopsis is rather dull. It makes zero indication as to what the story is about.<br /><br />The introduction is already striking me as odd. It plays at a frame story and addresses the reader directly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After all, I lived in a library for my whole life.//</span><br />Well, no, before he moved to Ponyville, he presumably lived in Twilight&#039;s room in the castle (though Faust&#039;s headcanon had him raised by Celestia for part of that time while Twilight was younger).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That’s the name of my mother, by the way.//</span><br />This feels out of place in a written medium. It;s more the kind of thing he&#039;d say in person, not write down once he&#039;s had time to collect his thoughts, so it comes across as inauthentic.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dragon eggs weren’t exact an easy resource to come by//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Most of my early years in Canterlot with her were spent helping her organize things, and keeping her company since her family couldn’t visit her often.//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. I saw a number of these throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Heh…//</span><br />Again, this comes across as weirdly informal for something that we know is recorded as a story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was grateful to have somepony //</span><br />Fine point here, and I know he&#039;s used this term in canon, but since he&#039;s including himself, would he use the &quot;pony&quot; version, particularly considering that he&#039;s (presumably) quite a bit older now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half finished//</span><br />Hyphenate your multi-word terms that act as a single modifier. You do this several times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight had giggled. I just refused to say anything//</span><br />Mixing tenses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sweating//</span><br />A reptile?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nothing’s wrong Twilight!//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lept//</span><br />leapt<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lying in the corner//</span><br />You could just cut this &quot;lying&quot; out, particularly since you just used it very soon before, even though it was in a different sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knowing that I had done wrong//</span><br />Most participles will be set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or hours for teleportation//</span><br />How would that take hours?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was her closest and only friend after all.//</span><br />By now, I&#039;m noticing that you use &quot;after all&quot; quite often.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ordinary routine//</span><br />Somewhat redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For years I tried to get her to talk to ponies, trying to coax her to come to parties or hang out with some of my friends, but she always declined.//</span><br />Misplaced modifier. It sounds like &quot;ponies&quot; are trying to coax her. And repetition of &quot;try.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That was the day that I first discovered that//</span><br />Might want to rephrase. 3 instances of &quot;that&quot; in 9 words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That was why I was so excited when Princess Celestia gave her a new assignment as her star pupil: to go to Ponyville and make a few friends.//</span><br />Look how far the material after the colon is from what it&#039;s clarifying.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;R-rarity//</span><br />It&#039;s a proper noun, so both instances should be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You didn’t want to crush me. I understand.” I stood up and simply shook my head, turning to leave. “Don’t worry, Rarity. I don’t hate you. I’m not even angry. I’m just thankful that you let me know.”</span><br />This situation is sure resolved quickly. You build it up as if it&#039;s some big thing, then it&#039;s over very quickly and with no fanfare. If he wants to brush it off because it&#039;s not the main point of what he has to say, fine, but he needs to indicate that, if it&#039;s the case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Carousel Boutique//</span><br />You don&#039;t need &quot;the&quot; when using specific names. You go to the store, but you go to Wal-Mart.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I just went straight to my bed and laid down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight would be right there//</span><br />How did Twilight not know that Rarity was already in a relationship? That&#039;s certainly the type of thing that girls share, and Rarity had no apparent motivation to keep it secret.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyes shining with sadness, but also pride</span><br />I can give you a pass when Spike talks about himself this way. But it&#039;s a bad idea to have him be telly when he&#039;s speaking about other characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hard working//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gentlecoltly//</span><br />Again, this isn&#039;t a word I would typically think of as applied to a dragon. Yes, Twilight would be used to using this word, but I also think she&#039;d be sensitive enough to have an awareness of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;animals, and Pinkie//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy had opened a clinic in Canterlot to help sick and injured animals//</span><br />Given that animals would be more prevalent in a rural area, why would she do this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if you’re a species that lives longer like I am//</span><br />It&#039;d sound smoother if the &quot;like referred to the thing closest to it (&quot;lives longer,&quot; not &quot;species&quot;): if you’re a species that lives longer like I do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That’s probably the one that stands by the most.//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;stands out&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Being forced to stop moving…//</span><br />I&#039;m also going to say that all the ellipses also are out of place, since this is supposed to be something that Spike has written. They indicate half-formed thoughts that peter out, and while this occurs in conversation, a writer has as long as he likes to sort out what he wants to write. They can serve occasionally to imply further information, but they&#039;re really a spoken thing more than a written thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spikey wikey//</span><br />The whole thing&#039;s a nickname. Capitalize both words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She laid back//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion again. &quot;Lie/lay/had lain&quot; takes no direct object, &quot;lay/laid/had laid&quot; does take one. You lie down, and you lay your head down.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trying to reach up and get something by her bedside, in the nightstand that lay next to her//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason for that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;together, smiling and having fun together//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I figure it’s what she would have wanted.//</span><br />Really? Maybe it&#039;s just me, but I figure she&#039;d want to go out in a spectacular crash while trying a very dangerous trick.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And then Daring Do put her whip and hat on her coat rack, sitting on her office chair.//</span><br />Sounds like the coat rack is sitting on the chair.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she laid there in her chair//</span><br />Lay/lie again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a clear night’s sky//</span><br />Just use &quot;night.&quot;<br /><br />Now for a session of point/counterpoint.<br /><br />Against your story is that it&#039;s a pretty common setup, particularly since it goes through the deaths of all 6 friends, even though it only lingers on two of them. It&#039;s become somewhat of a cliche to include all six and give special weight to the last of the group. It&#039;s also a bit weak on the conflict/growth front. There&#039;s no make-or-break moment where Spike must make a decision that will affect his future. There&#039;s nothing at stake. We don&#039;t see anything fundamental change about him as a character.<br /><br />For your story is that you barely mentioned four of the deaths, so it&#039;s not an ad nauseam collation of their final moments. The writing is pretty good, and you actually have a good setup for a decisive moment on Spike&#039;s part. Ask yourself: What about Twilight&#039;s death changes Spike? Show the after in stark contrast to the before, when he comes to some realization. He does have a subtle one, choosing to be happy about the time he shared with them. And then you mention subsequent Elements. Did he befriend them all? And what does he do with this newfound happiness? Volunteer as a docent at their memorials so he can teach generations about their accomplishments? Read Daring Do stories to children at the library? This probably isn&#039;t the kind of story that will show clear conflict, but I&#039;d like to see something along the lines of concrete character growth.<br /><br />Lastly, I&#039;ll reiterate the issue of the narrator&#039;s voice, insofar as this is supposed to be something Spike has written. It relies on a lot of conversational conceits, and thus loses the feel of something he&#039;s taken the time to write. It may actually be wiser to remove that and just have him narrate as if he&#039;s speaking, but then it&#039;d be more important not to have him address the reader.<br /><br />There were certain words I saw turn up a lot. &quot;Sad&quot; made 18 entries, which doesn&#039;t sound like a lot, but if you look at where they occur, you use them in clumps, which only makes them sound more repetitive. &quot;That&quot; appears 130 times. It really stuck out, and suggests you&#039;re relying on its use as the start of noun clauses too much and using repetitive sentence formulations as a result. It&#039;s actually quite common to remove it as a conjunction leading off a noun clause, so you could take care of a fair number that way. &quot;Was&quot; shows up 114 times, and I suspect other forms of that verb also make themselves known frequently. That&#039;s a verb writers can stand to do without, to a large degree. There are 38 instances of &quot;just,&quot; and like &quot;sad,&quot; they tend to occur in clumps.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 47

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:

>ever now and then//

Typo.

Story:

Your opening scene needs help. Having the narrator barge in and summarize the situation very quickly externalizes the reader from forming a connection with Twilight. You need to do a better job of grabbing the reader's interest than this. Go right into the dream. Make it immediately obvious that it is one, since you're not trying to play it as ambiguous, but the "hey, this is happening" followed by it actually happening is just throwing a needless speed bump in there.

>terrified sweat//

I see what you're going for, but it ends up personifying the sweat, and it just sounds weird.

>This is impossible! Nopony could possibly do this!

Redundant.

>scrutinizing look//

Describe it. Now is not the time to be telly. Twilight's perception at this moment is a severe source of stress for her, and she'd take great notice of how they regard her. Shortening all that to "scrutinizing" cheapens it.

>the chance to attempt such an opportunity//

Redundant language.

>with sadness//

See the section on telly language at the top of this thread. This is a particular kind of phrasing that is rarely necessary.

>She felt her horn light up and felt//

Repetitive phrasing.

>blood vessels in her face starting to light up//

Given that the story is from her viewpoint, how would she know this? Not to mention that it's kind of weird anyway.

>bottom thirtieth//

That's an awfully precise judgment to make, considering that it's far from the foremost thing on her mind.

>yet, you cannot even perform//

Commas after conjunctions are rarely correct. This one is not.

>Celestia’s School For Gifted and Talented Unicorns//

I don't believe the canon name has "and Talented" in it.

>signalling for her to leave//

This is unnecessary information that the reader can already figure out.

>Celestia barely even payed attention to Twilight//

Using "payed" instead of "paid" is typical of a specific definition of the word which you aren't using.

>seemingly annoyed//

How does Twilight conclude this?

>then-//

Use a proper em dash for cutoffs.

>Twilight was cut off//

No need for passive voice, and the "cut off" is redundant with what we can already see in the quote.

>to signify an order to be silent//

More language that is redundant. These meaningless phrases smack of strecthing for word count, which, considering how long the story is, could well be precisely what you were doing.

>nodded in agreement//

More redundant phrasing.

>The door burst open as her father charged in, scanning the room for any immediate signs of danger.//

Note that participles and "as" clauses synchronize actions, so all three of these things happen simultaneously. The first two, I could see, or the last two, but not all three. He's not scanning the room until after the door bursts open.

>beddings//

bedding

>Twilight shook her head to relieve herself of the shock of her father bursting into her room.//

Repetitive language, and more questionable content that the reader could have been left to intuit.

>E-everything’s fine dad//

Missing comma for direct address, and when using it as a term of address or reference, capitalize "Dad." Watch for other similar instances of "Mom" and "Dad."

>he could see her face clearly. He could see//

Repetitive language.

>Her father took a seat on the bed next to her, smiling softly.//

I bet you want the father to b smiling softly, but this tends to say she was.

>Twilight shifted and her features twisted into a grimace//

Missing comma. See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

Her father's inner monologue here is obviously a change in perspective. I don't see that it accomplishes anything. What does he reveal that's new or critical to the story? Shifting point of view is always a disorienting thing, so a writer must always judge whether the gains are greater than the losses. I don't think there's anything gained here.

>surprising him a bit//

This is still in his perspective. Especially in a story this short, you really shouldn't be jumping around to different characters without a very good reason.

>over take//

One word.

>You’ve done excellently in everything you’ve put your hoof too.//

To/too confusion.

>And you’ve made us so proud.”//

When one paragraph ends while still in a quote, and the next one starts with speech from the same character, you can leave off the closing quotation marks from the first paragraph.

>Twilight giggled and climbed back down onto the bed.//

Fourth straight paragraph that's started with "Twilight."

There is a notable lack of character growth or conflict here. Twilight experiences a very common and mundane bout of self-doubt. It's just a very pat piece, and one that plays more as a scene than a story. While pleasant enough, it's not really a well-developed thing. What changes about Twilight? How is she different for the experience? There's nothing here. Rather than go on about stylistic things, I'll just say that this needs to be something with a lot more meat to it before we could post it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ever now and then//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br />Story:<br /><br />Your opening scene needs help. Having the narrator barge in and summarize the situation very quickly externalizes the reader from forming a connection with Twilight. You need to do a better job of grabbing the reader&#039;s interest than this. Go right into the dream. Make it immediately obvious that it is one, since you&#039;re not trying to play it as ambiguous, but the &quot;hey, this is happening&quot; followed by it actually happening is just throwing a needless speed bump in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;terrified sweat//</span><br />I see what you&#039;re going for, but it ends up personifying the sweat, and it just sounds weird.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>This is impossible! Nopony could possibly do this!</i></span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scrutinizing look//</span><br />Describe it. Now is not the time to be telly. Twilight&#039;s perception at this moment is a severe source of stress for her, and she&#039;d take great notice of how they regard her. Shortening all that to &quot;scrutinizing&quot; cheapens it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the chance to attempt such an opportunity//</span><br />Redundant language.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with sadness//</span><br />See the section on telly language at the top of this thread. This is a particular kind of phrasing that is rarely necessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt her horn light up and felt//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blood vessels in her face starting to light up//</span><br />Given that the story is from her viewpoint, how would she know this? Not to mention that it&#039;s kind of weird anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bottom thirtieth//</span><br />That&#039;s an awfully precise judgment to make, considering that it&#039;s far from the foremost thing on her mind.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yet, you cannot even perform//</span><br />Commas after conjunctions are rarely correct. This one is not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia’s School For Gifted and Talented Unicorns//</span><br />I don&#039;t believe the canon name has &quot;and Talented&quot; in it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;signalling for her to leave//</span><br />This is unnecessary information that the reader can already figure out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia barely even payed attention to Twilight//</span><br />Using &quot;payed&quot; instead of &quot;paid&quot; is typical of a specific definition of the word which you aren&#039;t using.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;seemingly annoyed//</span><br />How does Twilight conclude this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then-//</span><br />Use a proper em dash for cutoffs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was cut off//</span><br />No need for passive voice, and the &quot;cut off&quot; is redundant with what we can already see in the quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to signify an order to be silent//</span><br />More language that is redundant. These meaningless phrases smack of strecthing for word count, which, considering how long the story is, could well be precisely what you were doing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nodded in agreement//</span><br />More redundant phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The door burst open as her father charged in, scanning the room for any immediate signs of danger.//</span><br />Note that participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses synchronize actions, so all three of these things happen simultaneously. The first two, I could see, or the last two, but not all three. He&#039;s not scanning the room until after the door bursts open.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;beddings//</span><br />bedding<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight shook her head to relieve herself of the shock of her father bursting into her room.//</span><br />Repetitive language, and more questionable content that the reader could have been left to intuit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;E-everything’s fine dad//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address, and when using it as a term of address or reference, capitalize &quot;Dad.&quot; Watch for other similar instances of &quot;Mom&quot; and &quot;Dad.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he could see her face clearly. He could see//</span><br />Repetitive language.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her father took a seat on the bed next to her, smiling softly.//</span><br />I bet you want the father to b smiling softly, but this tends to say she was.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight shifted and her features twisted into a grimace//</span><br />Missing comma. See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br />Her father&#039;s inner monologue here is obviously a change in perspective. I don&#039;t see that it accomplishes anything. What does he reveal that&#039;s new or critical to the story? Shifting point of view is always a disorienting thing, so a writer must always judge whether the gains are greater than the losses. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything gained here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;surprising him a bit//</span><br />This is still in his perspective. Especially in a story this short, you really shouldn&#039;t be jumping around to different characters without a very good reason.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;over take//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You’ve done excellently in everything you’ve put your hoof too.//</span><br />To/too confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And you’ve made us so proud.”//</span><br />When one paragraph ends while still in a quote, and the next one starts with speech from the same character, you can leave off the closing quotation marks from the first paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight giggled and climbed back down onto the bed.//</span><br />Fourth straight paragraph that&#039;s started with &quot;Twilight.&quot;<br /><br />There is a notable lack of character growth or conflict here. Twilight experiences a very common and mundane bout of self-doubt. It&#039;s just a very pat piece, and one that plays more as a scene than a story. While pleasant enough, it&#039;s not really a well-developed thing. What changes about Twilight? How is she different for the experience? There&#039;s nothing here. Rather than go on about stylistic things, I&#039;ll just say that this needs to be something with a lot more meat to it before we could post it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 48

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The storm clouds over Ponyville parted with a flash of lightning and a peal of thunder.//

Do you realize how close this is to "It was a dark and stormy night"?

>It was pulled by a duo of armored, bat-winged pegasi//

I don't see the need for passive voice here. It transfers the focus onto the chariot or the action, neither of which is interesting. Let the batponies carry the focus.

>Carnival games and food stands were set up all throughout the streets, and a silver and blue flag adorned with a crescent moon waved proudly atop the Town Hall.//

I'm seeing an awful lot of "to be" verbs so far. They're inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens not what is. Compare your two clauses here. The secon uses an active verb (waved) that makes it a more vivid read. I'm still getting a lot of passive voice, though.

>thump//

No need to italicize this as a sound effect. It's a valid word. Just leave it alone.

>Luna released the concealing shadows, flying out of the chariot//

Watch for misplaced modifiers, particularly participles. It sounds like the shadows are flying out of the chariot.

>returned, and the moonlight gently faded away. Luna’s eyes returned//

Watch repetition of words in a close space.

>And finally we get some kind of emotional reaction from Luna. She'd been awfully stoic up until now. You might want to bring in this aspect earlier, maybe her apprehension at how she would be received. The sooner you can make that emotional connection with a reader, the sooner you can grab his interest.


>thousand year-old//

Hyphenate the whole thing.

>Luna landed gracefully on the ground.//

The "on the ground" part is useless filler. Since the narrator is in Luna's perspective, it's odd for her to judge the landing as graceful herself. Perhaps just give me a few of her actions and their intent rather than have her draw the conclusion for me.

>heard several sighs of audible relief.//

First, these "with/of/in emotion" phrases are almost always telly and redundant with something already in the sentence Second, if she heard it, then you don't need to tell me it's audible.

>to not be//

I'm more of a stickler for split infinitives than most. While I'll still let many slide, these "not" ones are just so grating. "not to be"

>Luna mingled with the crowd for a few minutes, exchanging pleasantries and providing advice and blessings as royals are wont to do. However, her eyes kept scanning the crowd//

Repetition of "crowd."

>‘Twould//

Your smart quotes have given you an open quotation mark instead of an apostrophe. I suspect there are more of these; you'll have to find them and force them the other way.

>Luna shook her head in amusement.//

Another one of these redundant "in emotion" phrases.

>decorations of the transformed Ponyville.

>
>It was clear that the town had pulled out all the stops. Every building was adorned with various decorations
More repetition.

>haybales//

hay bales

>Low hanging//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors. I've seen a few of these.

>S-So//

Unless it's a proper noun, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>Twilight said with a stutter//

And there's no need to point out the stutter when we already saw it in the speech.

>damper//

You sure you didn't mean "dampen"? Damper is only a noun.

>Luna's tone gained a bitter tinge//

Given that she holds the perspective, it's odd for her to get at the bitterness indirectly through her tone or even notice it there.

>“I can… ”//

Extraneous space.

>T-Thank//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated. "Th-thank"

>It was probably just that Twilight was a tad absentminded, and tended to turn inward for her reflections.//

See the section on at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>Passersby stopped to gawk as they went, their faces were filled with awe and excitement.//

You've either got a comma splice there, or you've inserted an extraneous word into the second part that was supposed to be an absolute phrase.

>dings!//

Yeah, axe the sound effects.

>One-hundred eighty//

No hyphen.

>figid//

Typo.

>but however//

Redundant.

>laser-like//

So… ponies know what lasers are?

>Princess Celestia laid comfortably on her favorite silk pillow//

Lay/lie confusion.

>pulled a toffee out a small candy bag//

Missing word.

>and who know?//

Verb form.

>The symptoms are all there: Lapses in awareness, physical fatigue, a primal, almost magnetic attraction to darkness, and spiritual deterioration.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>The two of them had relocated to the balcony connected to the study.//

This is a really odd transition. Just tell me when they walk out there. Don't have it happen but hold back on telling me until after the fact.

>Her face quickly fell back into a morose melancholy//

Watch the telling. Better to describe how she looks in more basic terms and let the reader decode how she feels from it. There's a section on this at the top of the thread, too. Some telliness is fine, but we're at a pretty critical part of the story here.

>She stood there with her jaw hanging open for a few seconds while Luna stood there//

More repetition.

>She turned away to glower at nothing in particular//

Watch the head-hopping. This scene had been in Luna's perspective, but only Celestia would characterize it as "nothing in particular."

>ONLY//

Except in cases of Royal Canterlot Voice, italics are preferred for emphasis.

>I’m okay with that, but then that’s the only time you can do it. Fair?//

This is incredibly petty and narrow-minded of her, given that they're discussing the health of their subjects and that ceding to Luna on this matter is probably to everyone's benefit.

>Celestia rubbed the bridge of her nose.//

Do ponies even have this? You might better just characterize it as rubbing between her eyes.

>Celestia ignited another fire beside herself to keep warm.//

They're still out on the balcony. There's a facility out there for this?

>Celestia blinked. “As in, right here, right now?”//

This is now the eighth paragraph in a row that goes: <Short simple sentence with a token action. Speech.> It's really getting a plodding feel, like I'm reading a list.

>you’re going to be leaving your body behind, aren’t you? //

This necessarily begins a new sentence—it couldn't follow syntactically from the first. Capitalize.

>I can only hope that one day I’ll find a way to make it up to you.//

This is awfullt rushed, and an odd time to bring it up. It might be worth getting at her motivation for saying this or drawing it out a bit so it's not so sudden. It smacks of going for a needless emotional reaction from the reader that's tangential at best to the story.

>rebooted//

Another word choice that's questionable as part of the pony lexicon.

>experimentation//

Used that twice within a few sentences.

>into the city of Canterlot beyond. She called upon the power of the Garden and stretched herself out even farther, extending past the city, out into the valley beyond//

Even more repetition.

>The damage of being exposed to a thousand years of light//

Are you saying the effects are cumulative over generations? Because you just mentioned that she's gathering those less than three years old, so they don't have a thousand years of exposure… only three. Even the adults would only have some small finite length as well.

A word about song lyrics. Some readers simply skip them as a rule. I give them a chance, but I stop if I see that they're not bearing any of the plot. Unless there's something critical in them, like a song that gives Twilight a clue to the location of an artifact, for instance, they don't serve much purpose. Aside from a bit of needless mood-setting, I can't say these add anything.

>enormous, teal//

These are hierarchical adjectives and don't need a comma between them.

>face-to-face//

When used in a manner like this, where it doesn't precede its object (you're using it as a predicate adjective), you don't need the hyphens.

>“I am your Princess.”//

It looks like your open quotes are in normal font, while the close quotes are in italics. You do this multiple times.

>The children weren't as bright as they once were anymore. Their outlines were faint, and their eyes were half-lidded with dreamy looks on their faces. Luna wished she could keep them here longer, to share with them the true wonders and beauty of the night, but they foals were too impressionable. She welcomed those who had an affinity for darkness, yes, but too much of it would be just as much of a problem as an overabundance of light.//

I've gone through dozens of sentences in this area and only counted two that didn't start with the subject. This part of the story really needs some variety in sentence structure, but don't go overboard with it. A little here and there works wonders.

>but they foals were too impressionable//

Typo.

>split throughout the sky like a meteor shower//

Actually, a meteor shower is pretty organized. The meteors all emanate from a common spot and all move in the same direction.

>but if nothing else, then they’ll just need the same treatment as the adults.//

Get rid of that "then."

>Celestia defended//

Questionable choice of speaking verb. It takes a direct object, but that object is the thing being defended, not the words that do so.

>They may want to go back If they were to have any memories of it//

Extraneous capitalization.

>Twenty Five Years Later-//

Surely there's a less blunt instrument you can use than this. Work it into the narration, have it revealed in some dialogue, etc.

>long tonight due to things starting with an unnaturally long//

Repetition.

>Minute’s widened.//

Missing word.

>Things had gone well over the last two and a half decades//

See? You did it nicely there. Now you don't need that obtrusive opening line for this scene.

>She had her own Realm now//

That's a rather teasing thing to insinuate without explaining anything.

>Luna was grateful//

Start here and scroll back up a bit. Note how repetitive the first words of each paragraph are.

>She was just glad that there hadn't been any lasting effects, a shift in either direction could cause ponykind to descend into madness.//

Comma splice.

>“W—Where….”//

Again, consider what sound would actually be repeated (wh-where). You also need a hyphen for the stutter, not a dash, and you have one too many dots in the ellipsis.

Nice story, but you might want to allow Luna a bit more of an emotional response, if only internally. She's bordering on stoic about it, and if she were more touched by the remembrance of the song, it might carry more power. Now I do see that the song comes in important, but note that only a small part of it is, and only the fact that it was remembered, not the words themselves. At least the remembered part is short enough that readers will probably stick with it, so I'd encourage you to limit it to that and gloss over the rest of it as Luna continuing to sing.

The only other thing I'd point out is the sheer amount of repetition: Sentence after sentence with the same structure, several paragraphs in a row starting with the same thing, repeated use of words and phrases in a close space without a thematic reason for doing so. I've also pointed out the specific example of "to be." Just looking for the most common forms, I counted over 200. That is incredibly high. I pointed out one sentence where you used that verb unnecessarily in one clause, then picked an action verb in the other clause where you could have been lazy and used another "to be" verb. It causes several problems: overuse of passive voice (somewhat of a problem here), telly language (again, some), and a need for more active verb choice (this is the main one). Keep an eye out for these verbs as you read back through and eliminate a bunch of these. It's impractical to go without them entirely, but you should have no trouble getting rid of the majority of them.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The storm clouds over Ponyville parted with a flash of lightning and a peal of thunder.//</span><br />Do you realize how close this is to &quot;It was a dark and stormy night&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was pulled by a duo of armored, bat-winged pegasi//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the need for passive voice here. It transfers the focus onto the chariot or the action, neither of which is interesting. Let the batponies carry the focus.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carnival games and food stands were set up all throughout the streets, and a silver and blue flag adorned with a crescent moon waved proudly atop the Town Hall.//</span><br />I&#039;m seeing an awful lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs so far. They&#039;re inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens not what is. Compare your two clauses here. The secon uses an active verb (waved) that makes it a more vivid read. I&#039;m still getting a lot of passive voice, though.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>thump</i>//</span><br />No need to italicize this as a sound effect. It&#039;s a valid word. Just leave it alone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna released the concealing shadows, flying out of the chariot//</span><br />Watch for misplaced modifiers, particularly participles. It sounds like the shadows are flying out of the chariot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;returned, and the moonlight gently faded away. Luna’s eyes returned//</span><br />Watch repetition of words in a close space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And finally we get some kind of emotional reaction from Luna. She&#039;d been awfully stoic up until now. You might want to bring in this aspect earlier, maybe her apprehension at how she would be received. The sooner you can make that emotional connection with a reader, the sooner you can grab his interest.</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thousand year-old//</span><br />Hyphenate the whole thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna landed gracefully on the ground.//</span><br />The &quot;on the ground&quot; part is useless filler. Since the narrator is in Luna&#039;s perspective, it&#039;s odd for her to judge the landing as graceful herself. Perhaps just give me a few of her actions and their intent rather than have her draw the conclusion for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;heard several sighs of audible relief.//</span><br />First, these &quot;with/of/in emotion&quot; phrases are almost always telly and redundant with something already in the sentence Second, if she heard it, then you don&#039;t need to tell me it&#039;s audible.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not be//</span><br />I&#039;m more of a stickler for split infinitives than most. While I&#039;ll still let many slide, these &quot;not&quot; ones are just so grating. &quot;not to be&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna mingled with the crowd for a few minutes, exchanging pleasantries and providing advice and blessings as royals are wont to do. However, her eyes kept scanning the crowd//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;crowd.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Twould//</span><br />Your smart quotes have given you an open quotation mark instead of an apostrophe. I suspect there are more of these; you&#039;ll have to find them and force them the other way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna shook her head in amusement.//</span><br />Another one of these redundant &quot;in emotion&quot; phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;decorations of the transformed Ponyville.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was clear that the town had pulled out all the stops. Every building was adorned with various decorations</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;haybales//</span><br />hay bales<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Low hanging//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors. I&#039;ve seen a few of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S-So//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a proper noun, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight said with a stutter//</span><br />And there&#039;s no need to point out the stutter when we already saw it in the speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;damper//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;dampen&quot;? Damper is only a noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna&#039;s tone gained a bitter tinge//</span><br />Given that she holds the perspective, it&#039;s odd for her to get at the bitterness indirectly through her tone or even notice it there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I can… ”//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-Thank//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated. &quot;Th-thank&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was probably just that Twilight was a tad absentminded, and tended to turn inward for her reflections.//</span><br />See the section on at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Passersby stopped to gawk as they went, their faces were filled with awe and excitement.//</span><br />You&#039;ve either got a comma splice there, or you&#039;ve inserted an extraneous word into the second part that was supposed to be an absolute phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>dings!</i>//</span><br />Yeah, axe the sound effects.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One-hundred eighty//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;figid//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but however//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laser-like//</span><br />So… ponies know what lasers are?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Celestia laid comfortably on her favorite silk pillow//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pulled a toffee out a small candy bag//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and who know?//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The symptoms are all there: Lapses in awareness, physical fatigue, a primal, almost magnetic attraction to darkness, and spiritual deterioration.//</span><br />Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two of them had relocated to the balcony connected to the study.//</span><br />This is a really odd transition. Just tell me when they walk out there. Don&#039;t have it happen but hold back on telling me until after the fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her face quickly fell back into a morose melancholy//</span><br />Watch the telling. Better to describe how she looks in more basic terms and let the reader decode how she feels from it. There&#039;s a section on this at the top of the thread, too. Some telliness is fine, but we&#039;re at a pretty critical part of the story here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stood there with her jaw hanging open for a few seconds while Luna stood there//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned away to glower at nothing in particular//</span><br />Watch the head-hopping. This scene had been in Luna&#039;s perspective, but only Celestia would characterize it as &quot;nothing in particular.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ONLY//</span><br />Except in cases of Royal Canterlot Voice, italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m okay with that, but then that’s the only time you can do it. Fair?//</span><br />This is incredibly petty and narrow-minded of her, given that they&#039;re discussing the health of their subjects and that ceding to Luna on this matter is probably to everyone&#039;s benefit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia rubbed the bridge of her nose.//</span><br />Do ponies even have this? You might better just characterize it as rubbing between her eyes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia ignited another fire beside herself to keep warm.//</span><br />They&#039;re still out on the balcony. There&#039;s a facility out there for this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia blinked. “As in, right here, right now?”//</span><br />This is now the eighth paragraph in a row that goes: &lt;Short simple sentence with a token action. Speech.&gt; It&#039;s really getting a plodding feel, like I&#039;m reading a list.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you’re going to be leaving your body behind, aren’t you? //</span><br />This necessarily begins a new sentence—it couldn&#039;t follow syntactically from the first. Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can only hope that one day I’ll find a way to make it up to you.//</span><br />This is awfullt rushed, and an odd time to bring it up. It might be worth getting at her motivation for saying this or drawing it out a bit so it&#039;s not so sudden. It smacks of going for a needless emotional reaction from the reader that&#039;s tangential at best to the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rebooted//</span><br />Another word choice that&#039;s questionable as part of the pony lexicon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;experimentation//</span><br />Used that twice within a few sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;into the city of Canterlot beyond. She called upon the power of the Garden and stretched herself out even farther, extending past the city, out into the valley beyond//</span><br />Even more repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The damage of being exposed to a thousand years of light//</span><br />Are you saying the effects are cumulative over generations? Because you just mentioned that she&#039;s gathering those less than three years old, so they don&#039;t have a thousand years of exposure… only three. Even the adults would only have some small finite length as well.<br /><br />A word about song lyrics. Some readers simply skip them as a rule. I give them a chance, but I stop if I see that they&#039;re not bearing any of the plot. Unless there&#039;s something critical in them, like a song that gives Twilight a clue to the location of an artifact, for instance, they don&#039;t serve much purpose. Aside from a bit of needless mood-setting, I can&#039;t say these add anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;enormous, teal//</span><br />These are hierarchical adjectives and don&#039;t need a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;face-to-face//</span><br />When used in a manner like this, where it doesn&#039;t precede its object (you&#039;re using it as a predicate adjective), you don&#039;t need the hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“<i>I am your Princess.”</i>//</span><br />It looks like your open quotes are in normal font, while the close quotes are in italics. You do this multiple times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The children weren&#039;t as bright as they once were anymore. Their outlines were faint, and their eyes were half-lidded with dreamy looks on their faces. Luna wished she could keep them here longer, to share with them the true wonders and beauty of the night, but they foals were too impressionable. She welcomed those who had an affinity for darkness, yes, but too much of it would be just as much of a problem as an overabundance of light.//</span><br />I&#039;ve gone through dozens of sentences in this area and only counted two that didn&#039;t start with the subject. This part of the story really needs some variety in sentence structure, but don&#039;t go overboard with it. A little here and there works wonders.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but they foals were too impressionable//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;split throughout the sky like a meteor shower//</span><br />Actually, a meteor shower is pretty organized. The meteors all emanate from a common spot and all move in the same direction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but if nothing else, then they’ll just need the same treatment as the adults.//</span><br />Get rid of that &quot;then.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia defended//</span><br />Questionable choice of speaking verb. It takes a direct object, but that object is the thing being defended, not the words that do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They may want to go back If they were to have any memories of it//</span><br />Extraneous capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twenty Five Years Later-//</span><br />Surely there&#039;s a less blunt instrument you can use than this. Work it into the narration, have it revealed in some dialogue, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long tonight due to things starting with an unnaturally long//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Minute’s widened.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Things had gone well over the last two and a half decades//</span><br />See? You did it nicely there. Now you don&#039;t need that obtrusive opening line for this scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had her own Realm now//</span><br />That&#039;s a rather teasing thing to insinuate without explaining anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna was grateful//</span><br />Start here and scroll back up a bit. Note how repetitive the first words of each paragraph are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was just glad that there hadn&#039;t been any lasting effects, a shift in either direction could cause ponykind to descend into madness.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“W—Where….”//</span><br />Again, consider what sound would actually be repeated (wh-where). You also need a hyphen for the stutter, not a dash, and you have one too many dots in the ellipsis.<br /><br />Nice story, but you might want to allow Luna a bit more of an emotional response, if only internally. She&#039;s bordering on stoic about it, and if she were more touched by the remembrance of the song, it might carry more power. Now I do see that the song comes in important, but note that only a small part of it is, and only the fact that it was remembered, not the words themselves. At least the remembered part is short enough that readers will probably stick with it, so I&#039;d encourage you to limit it to that and gloss over the rest of it as Luna continuing to sing.<br /><br />The only other thing I&#039;d point out is the sheer amount of repetition: Sentence after sentence with the same structure, several paragraphs in a row starting with the same thing, repeated use of words and phrases in a close space without a thematic reason for doing so. I&#039;ve also pointed out the specific example of &quot;to be.&quot; Just looking for the most common forms, I counted over 200. That is incredibly high. I pointed out one sentence where you used that verb unnecessarily in one clause, then picked an action verb in the other clause where you could have been lazy and used another &quot;to be&quot; verb. It causes several problems: overuse of passive voice (somewhat of a problem here), telly language (again, some), and a need for more active verb choice (this is the main one). Keep an eye out for these verbs as you read back through and eliminate a bunch of these. It&#039;s impractical to go without them entirely, but you should have no trouble getting rid of the majority of them.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 49

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I was found in the woods as a foal//

What was that scene break for? You didn't change perspective, time, or location. Cadance is still right there talking to Shining Armor, and weirdly waffling back and forth between narrating and speaking.

>before-//

Please use a proper dash for interruptions.

>She cast a spell that drained the warm feelings of the villagers in an empty attempt to fill the void in her heart.//

So… she's a changeling?

>You can't do this!//

As this is the first piece of dialogue, you should identify the speaker with a speech tag. You can settle into going without tags later, once we've gotten accustomed to the various characters' voices.

>"No time to waste, then. I shall begin immediately."//

That's awfully florid language for one who warrants being addressed as "child."

>not the imposing structure of stone and wood suspended from an overgrown grove of trees entwined together I found before me//

This is a very winding sentence that changes focus so many times that it just comes across as a jumble. If these are all ideas worth mentioning, you could stand to do so over a few sentences.

>"So I'm going to be your friend."//

This whole exchange is very forced. She's already decided sight-unseen to befriend this mare? It's going to take a little more of her internal reasoning to get me there. Otherwise it just ends up as this incongruous mix of naivete and very mature vocabulary.

>I could tell I struck a nerve, though she tried not to let it show.//

For the previous dozen or so paragraphs, I've gotten barely three character actions. Have a look at the section on Talking Heads at the top of this thread.

>my fear that what happened next//

This is an odd juxtaposition, given that she just told Prismia that was her fear, and I doubt you did this intentionally, since you're not making a point from it.

>After the mob is through with me, you should go back to them. Don't throw your life away over three days with an unlovable monster.//

That's a very abrupt change of heart. And given that it's a main point of the story, it's not helping you to gloss over it all. Let me see a more gradual transformation.

>The flames spread like-//

Use a proper dash for asides, too.

>– not that it was literally a room, but close enough,//

Again use a proper dash, and pair it with one at the end of the aside.

>your majesty//

Capitalize the honorific.

>Aunt Tia grinned slyly.//

You're really wavering between flashback mode and having present-day Cadance narrate. It's disorienting. Here, she's at least working more in flashback mode, when she wouldn't refer to Celestia as such.

So you framed the story as Cadance talking to Shining Armor, then went into the flashback with a scene break, waffled on whether it was actually being presented as a flashback, then went back to Shining Armor without a scene break. It's just very… inconsistent.

Cadance also concentrates so much on what happens at the expense of how any of it made her feel. This is an amazing experience, and yet it all comes across very factually, as if she's reading a lab report.

That's really the big overall advice I have, since it's the elephant in the room that needs to be addressed before ironing out the details: find a consistent narrative voice and forge a much more emotional connection between Cadance and the reader so that he cares what happens to her. The story is really all about the emotions of this experience; Shining Armor doesn't seem particularly interested, and the outcome is already known, so conveying her personal experience is the only thing left, and it does that in a fairly cold manner.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was found in the woods as a foal//</span><br />What was that scene break for? You didn&#039;t change perspective, time, or location. Cadance is still right there talking to Shining Armor, and weirdly waffling back and forth between narrating and speaking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;before-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash for interruptions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She cast a spell that drained the warm feelings of the villagers in an empty attempt to fill the void in her heart.//</span><br />So… she&#039;s a changeling?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You can&#039;t do this!//</span><br />As this is the first piece of dialogue, you should identify the speaker with a speech tag. You can settle into going without tags later, once we&#039;ve gotten accustomed to the various characters&#039; voices.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;No time to waste, then. I shall begin immediately.&quot;//</span><br />That&#039;s awfully florid language for one who warrants being addressed as &quot;child.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not the imposing structure of stone and wood suspended from an overgrown grove of trees entwined together I found before me//</span><br />This is a very winding sentence that changes focus so many times that it just comes across as a jumble. If these are all ideas worth mentioning, you could stand to do so over a few sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;So I&#039;m going to be your friend.&quot;//</span><br />This whole exchange is very forced. She&#039;s already decided sight-unseen to befriend this mare? It&#039;s going to take a little more of her internal reasoning to get me there. Otherwise it just ends up as this incongruous mix of naivete and very mature vocabulary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I could tell I struck a nerve, though she tried not to let it show.//</span><br />For the previous dozen or so paragraphs, I&#039;ve gotten barely three character actions. Have a look at the section on Talking Heads at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my fear that what happened next//</span><br />This is an odd juxtaposition, given that she just told Prismia that was her fear, and I doubt you did this intentionally, since you&#039;re not making a point from it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After the mob is through with me, you should go back to them. Don&#039;t throw your life away over three days with an unlovable monster.//</span><br />That&#039;s a very abrupt change of heart. And given that it&#039;s a main point of the story, it&#039;s not helping you to gloss over it all. Let me see a more gradual transformation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The flames spread like-//</span><br />Use a proper dash for asides, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;– not that it was literally a room, but close enough,//</span><br />Again use a proper dash, and pair it with one at the end of the aside.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your majesty//</span><br />Capitalize the honorific.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Aunt Tia grinned slyly.//</span><br />You&#039;re really wavering between flashback mode and having present-day Cadance narrate. It&#039;s disorienting. Here, she&#039;s at least working more in flashback mode, when she wouldn&#039;t refer to Celestia as such.<br /><br />So you framed the story as Cadance talking to Shining Armor, then went into the flashback with a scene break, waffled on whether it was actually being presented as a flashback, then went back to Shining Armor <i>without</i> a scene break. It&#039;s just very… inconsistent.<br /><br />Cadance also concentrates so much on what happens at the expense of how any of it made her feel. This is an amazing experience, and yet it all comes across very factually, as if she&#039;s reading a lab report.<br /><br />That&#039;s really the big overall advice I have, since it&#039;s the elephant in the room that needs to be addressed before ironing out the details: find a consistent narrative voice and forge a much more emotional connection between Cadance and the reader so that he cares what happens to her. The story is really all about the emotions of this experience; Shining Armor doesn&#039;t seem particularly interested, and the outcome is already known, so conveying her personal experience is the only thing left, and it does that in a fairly cold manner.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Dec 2nd, 2013 21:48</span></div><br/>

story AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 50

>>129233

First off, thank you for the detailed review. It's incredibly valuable to me.

I won't comment on the mechanical things and simply fix them. Since you wondered, though: I'm not British, but German.

You're right that the story lacks conflict and character growth. It's more an emotional picture than a story, really. This is wanted, though; AJ's life is static, and it is the lack of conflict/progression that breaks her. Some sort of character growth in the timespan of a single day would be unrealistic, and a longer timespan would break the concept. I'm pretty lost on how to fix this.

Thanks for making me aware of the "piling on" issue. I've had someone comment before that the story felt too manipulative, which made him shield himself from the emotions. I didn't heed his words then, but having it spelled out here certainly made me see the point. I guess I wanted to cram in too much. Dementia and only living through your progeny are old-people-problems, too… I tried to include some happy memories as counterbalance, but all that is heavily outweighed by bad-ends. I'll work it over.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129233" onclick="return highlight('129233', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129233">&gt;&gt;129233</a><br /><br />First off, thank you for the detailed review. It&#039;s incredibly valuable to me.<br /><br />I won&#039;t comment on the mechanical things and simply fix them. Since you wondered, though: I&#039;m not British, but German.<br /><br />You&#039;re right that the story lacks conflict and character growth. It&#039;s more an emotional picture than a story, really. This is wanted, though; AJ&#039;s life is static, and it is the lack of conflict/progression that breaks her. Some sort of character growth in the timespan of a single day would be unrealistic, and a longer timespan would break the concept. I&#039;m pretty lost on how to fix this.<br /><br />Thanks for making me aware of the &quot;piling on&quot; issue. I&#039;ve had someone comment before that the story felt too manipulative, which made him shield himself from the emotions. I didn&#039;t heed his words then, but having it spelled out here certainly made me see the point. I guess I wanted to cram in too much. Dementia and only living through your progeny are old-people-problems, too… I tried to include some happy memories as counterbalance, but all that is heavily outweighed by bad-ends. I&#039;ll work it over.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 51

>>129253
Even though we're only with AJ for one day, that doesn't mean you can't grow her or give us some insight into her character. The AJ we get at the end of the story is the exact same one we have at the beginning. Aside from finding out why she's sad, there's not much point in reading. Let us learn something surprising about her. Let her come to an important realization about herself. Let her come to a turning point and make a decision. Something.

Not that you can't have a story like this that has a thin plot, but they're difficult to do well.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129253" onclick="return highlight('129253', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129253">&gt;&gt;129253</a><br />Even though we&#039;re only with AJ for one day, that doesn&#039;t mean you can&#039;t grow her or give us some insight into her character. The AJ we get at the end of the story is the exact same one we have at the beginning. Aside from finding out <i>why</i> she&#039;s sad, there&#039;s not much point in reading. Let us learn something surprising about her. Let her come to an important realization about herself. Let her come to a turning point and make a decision. Something.<br /><br />Not that you can&#039;t have a story like this that has a thin plot, but they&#039;re difficult to do well.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 52

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:

This needs a ton of help. Your first bit tells us this story's relation to another. Move that to the end, and put it in a separate paragraph. Next, we get a sentence the twist and winds so much that it loses focus. We have <Adverbial prepositional phrase>, <another adverbial prepositional phrase>, <subject>, <appositive>, <second item in list>, <third item in list>, <predicate>, <appositive with its own internal comma>. Seven commas in one sentence. You're making it do too much. Please write out the number, and it's not necessary to capitalize after the colon, since it doesn't refer to multiple sentences. Then finally, we get teo sentences that address the reader (you). They can be tricky to avoid, but it is possible.

Story:

That first paragraph really doesn't accomplish anything. It speaks in bland generalities and doesn't get to the point.

I'm only a couple of paragraphs in and I'm already noting the number of colons. It's not that they're misused; it's that there are so many that it feels unnatural. You don't want the writing calling attention to itself, and this is one thing that will do it: overusing unusual punctuation or language. Now that I look, there are only three colons in the text, but guess what? They're all within the first four paragraphs. That's setting an initial impression that you don't want.

>The shining streets were bustling with commotion and activity. Street venders and activities at every corner visited by the crystal ponies who, on this day, seemed to shine a little brighter than usual.//

Passive voice is often a bad choice, but pasrticularly so early in the story, where you need action to grab the reader's interest. That second sentence is incomplete as well, and oddly so. You're not taking a conversational tone, and I don't see a thematic reason for it.

>the largest crowds were not visiting flugelhorn or hatstands, or even watching the jousts. Rather, it was the newscolts who attracted the largest crowds.//

Watch for close repetition of words and phrases. You've reused "the largest crowds" here for no apparent stylistic reason.

>One-hundred//

Hyphens only go between the tens and ones words. Twenty-three, eighty-six thousand, four hundred sixty-one.

>a dark, a robed figure//

Extraneous word.

>The figure moved to the thinnest part of the crowd//

This is the seventh instance of "crowd" in the last five paragraphs.

>adorned in brown vestiges contrary towards it’s onyx-colored counterpart//

This is horribly contorted. First, I don't think "vestige" is the word you want here. Perhaps "vestments"? You've confused "it's" with "its," and your language of "contrary… counterpart" is fairly redundant. Furthermore how does brown contrast with onyx? Much onyx is brown, and onyx is preferably in high contrast to itself anyway, mixing a light hue with a dark one, so in contrast to contrast is… bland?

>The slender cloaked pony raised a hoof, carefully pulling back the hood of the cloak revealing a white face, a horn, and a few locks of her long, scarlet mane protruding from the shadows of her attire, her purple eyes glistening just as brightly as her crystal coat.//

Another sentence that rambles on so long that it loses focus. It goes from the pony to the cloak to a number of her features to her cloak again to her features again. If these are all truly important, they deserve to be digested in smaller chunks. You also use three participles in the sentence. Repetition of structure is as bad as repetition of words.

>casted//

cast

>horrendous//

Now you need to be careful with your narrative voice. Who is making this judgment? The narrator isn't in any character's perspective, so he's essentially telling me this is how I should feel about them, but I don't have any evidence to agree with him.

>After the attack I was so worried, I know you live near the outskirts so I would’ve come//

That comma is a splice, and you're missing one later in the sentence. See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>placed a hoof towards//

"Place" connotes setting something still, but "towards" indicates motion. This doesn't fit.

>Jokes. She wasn’t exactly a fan of this stallion’s humor, and right now certainly was not a time for joking. This was the greatest disaster which the empire had seen since the second age!//

Way too abrupt. You have to ease through transitions of perspective. Your narrator has been objective so far, and without any warning, we're pushed very deep into her thoughts. It's jarring. You have to do these things smoothly. As the only established perspective, this also suggests she's the one making the judgment of "horrendous" earlier, but we know that's not the case.

>She was at a loss for words.//

You don't need to narrate what's already apparent from the speech.

>Woah//

Why can nobody ever spell this right? Whoa.

And now we're tossed into his perspective. See the section at the top of this thread on head-hopping.

>city state//

city-state

>then," he turned to the mare, "Gloriana//

That's not how to punctuate a narrative aside in a quote.
then—" he turned to the mare "—Gloriana

>Gloriana put a hoof to Somber’s horn, pushing him back, nearly causing him to lose his balance as he clumsily regained his hoofing.//

Note that participles and "as" or "while" clauses synchronize actions, so the "put," "pushing," "causing," and "regained" all happen at the same time. That doesn't work.

>and bitterly added//

I'm seeing a lot of these -ly adverbs. Some are okay, but it doesn't take many to make the story telly. See the section at the top of this thread on show versus tell. To paraphrase, I have no indication of her mood here except for that one word. It's better to get me to interpret her mood through details of how she looks and acts, and what inflections she makes in her speech. Show me what and observer would note about her, not what conclusions he would draw from what he sees.

>Somber couldn’t help but laugh at her plight//

Missing end punctuation.

>Nobles were notorious for never being able to swallow their pride, and even Gloriana was no exception.//

This is a rather subjective statement, but I have no idea who holds the perspective here, so I don't know whose opinion it is. It's a fine point, but if you instead phrase it as "The populace commonly considered nobles to be notorious…" then you've changed it from the narrator's opinion to a statement of fact.

>“It’s okay” he assured her.//

Dialogue punctuation.

>Stallion//

Why is this capitalized?

>I'll get to you throughPalace garden.//

Something's clearly messed up.

>She lied down//

Lay/lie confusion. Actually, it's confusion of two different meanings of "lie."

>her armed held//

Typo, and… she has an arm?

>I must be insane for leaving behind any more nights like this….

A four-dot ellipsis is typical for formal writing, but it's unusual to see in fiction.

>He looked down at Gloriana, sliding out from underneath her grasp.//

Another thing to watch with participles: they're common candidates for misplaced modifiers. Due to their proximity, it sounds like Gloriana is the one "sliding."

>With that//

Phrases like this and "at that point" are horribly self-referential to the narration.

>he carefully trotted to the window, undoing the latch.//

Here's another example of a synchronization issue. He can't undo the latch at the same time he's trotting to the window, unless you want to add some language to say he's doing it with his magic.

>Camp Spyrius//

Another one of these oddly off-putting introductions.

>cyan coated//

You've done pretty well with hyphenating your compound descriptors, so this may just be an oversight.

>the shine of his coat dimmed from exhaustion and perspiration//

Wouldn't perspiration increase the shine?

>The unicorn smugly replied “Well isn’t that a first?”//

Another dialogue punctuation error. There's a section on this at the top of the thread.

>trying as he tried//

Looks like you changed your mind and forgot to delete the loser.

>but–//

Looks like you missed one of these.

>turning to lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>?’.//

Doubled end punctuation.

>being a unicorn and all//

You'd capitalized "unicorn" in chapter 1. Be consistent.

>‘em//

Your smart quotes have made the apostrophe backward.

>The cyan stallion//

You're using this phrase quite a lot. See the section at the top of this thread on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.

>half-heartedly//

halfheartedly

>the atmosphere of the camp was filled with fear; the fear of certain death.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause anywhere after it.

>little more than police officers, and with the low crime rate they did little more than//

Repetition.

>three-dozen//

No reason to hyphenate that.

The writing here was mostly good. The dialogue was well done, and while the narration had a few nice turns of phrase, it felt stiff and unnatural in places. The story itself is fine—it's more that there are so many of these niggling errors. I'd say the two major ones are the flighty narrator and the overabundance of participial phrases, sometimes several in one sentence, which can also cause timing problems and be misplaced modifiers.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><br />This needs a ton of help. Your first bit tells us this story&#039;s relation to another. Move that to the end, and put it in a separate paragraph. Next, we get a sentence the twist and winds so much that it loses focus. We have &lt;Adverbial prepositional phrase&gt;, &lt;another adverbial prepositional phrase&gt;, &lt;subject&gt;, &lt;appositive&gt;, &lt;second item in list&gt;, &lt;third item in list&gt;, &lt;predicate&gt;, &lt;appositive with its own internal comma&gt;. Seven commas in one sentence. You&#039;re making it do too much. Please write out the number, and it&#039;s not necessary to capitalize after the colon, since it doesn&#039;t refer to multiple sentences. Then finally, we get teo sentences that address the reader (you). They can be tricky to avoid, but it is possible.<br /><br />Story:<br /><br />That first paragraph really doesn&#039;t accomplish anything. It speaks in bland generalities and doesn&#039;t get to the point.<br /><br />I&#039;m only a couple of paragraphs in and I&#039;m already noting the number of colons. It&#039;s not that they&#039;re misused; it&#039;s that there are so many that it feels unnatural. You don&#039;t want the writing calling attention to itself, and this is one thing that will do it: overusing unusual punctuation or language. Now that I look, there are only three colons in the text, but guess what? They&#039;re all within the first four paragraphs. That&#039;s setting an initial impression that you don&#039;t want.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The shining streets were bustling with commotion and activity. Street venders and activities at every corner visited by the crystal ponies who, on this day, seemed to shine a little brighter than usual.//</span><br />Passive voice is often a bad choice, but pasrticularly so early in the story, where you need action to grab the reader&#039;s interest. That second sentence is incomplete as well, and oddly so. You&#039;re not taking a conversational tone, and I don&#039;t see a thematic reason for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the largest crowds were not visiting flugelhorn or hatstands, or even watching the jousts. Rather, it was the newscolts who attracted the largest crowds.//</span><br />Watch for close repetition of words and phrases. You&#039;ve reused &quot;the largest crowds&quot; here for no apparent stylistic reason.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One-hundred//</span><br />Hyphens only go between the tens and ones words. Twenty-three, eighty-six thousand, four hundred sixty-one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a dark, a robed figure//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The figure moved to the thinnest part of the crowd//</span><br />This is the seventh instance of &quot;crowd&quot; in the last five paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;adorned in brown vestiges contrary towards it’s onyx-colored counterpart//</span><br />This is horribly contorted. First, I don&#039;t think &quot;vestige&quot; is the word you want here. Perhaps &quot;vestments&quot;? You&#039;ve confused &quot;it&#039;s&quot; with &quot;its,&quot; and your language of &quot;contrary… counterpart&quot; is fairly redundant. Furthermore how does brown contrast with onyx? Much onyx is brown, and onyx is preferably in high contrast to itself anyway, mixing a light hue with a dark one, so in contrast to contrast is… bland?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The slender cloaked pony raised a hoof, carefully pulling back the hood of the cloak revealing a white face, a horn, and a few locks of her long, scarlet mane protruding from the shadows of her attire, her purple eyes glistening just as brightly as her crystal coat.//</span><br />Another sentence that rambles on so long that it loses focus. It goes from the pony to the cloak to a number of her features to her cloak again to her features again. If these are all truly important, they deserve to be digested in smaller chunks. You also use three participles in the sentence. Repetition of structure is as bad as repetition of words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;casted//</span><br />cast<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;horrendous//</span><br />Now you need to be careful with your narrative voice. Who is making this judgment? The narrator isn&#039;t in any character&#039;s perspective, so he&#039;s essentially telling me this is how I should feel about them, but I don&#039;t have any evidence to agree with him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After the attack I was so worried, I know you live near the outskirts so I would’ve come//</span><br />That comma is a splice, and you&#039;re missing one later in the sentence. See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;placed a hoof towards//</span><br />&quot;Place&quot; connotes setting something still, but &quot;towards&quot; indicates motion. This doesn&#039;t fit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Jokes. She wasn’t exactly a fan of this stallion’s humor, and right now certainly was not a time for joking. This was the greatest disaster which the empire had seen since the second age!//</span><br />Way too abrupt. You have to ease through transitions of perspective. Your narrator has been objective so far, and without any warning, we&#039;re pushed very deep into her thoughts. It&#039;s jarring. You have to do these things smoothly. As the only established perspective, this also suggests she&#039;s the one making the judgment of &quot;horrendous&quot; earlier, but we know that&#039;s not the case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was at a loss for words.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to narrate what&#039;s already apparent from the speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Woah//</span><br />Why can nobody ever spell this right? Whoa.<br /><br />And now we&#039;re tossed into his perspective. See the section at the top of this thread on head-hopping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;city state//</span><br />city-state<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then,&quot; he turned to the mare, &quot;Gloriana//</span><br />That&#039;s not how to punctuate a narrative aside in a quote.<br />then—&quot; he turned to the mare &quot;—Gloriana<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gloriana put a hoof to Somber’s horn, pushing him back, nearly causing him to lose his balance as he clumsily regained his hoofing.//</span><br />Note that participles and &quot;as&quot; or &quot;while&quot; clauses synchronize actions, so the &quot;put,&quot; &quot;pushing,&quot; &quot;causing,&quot; and &quot;regained&quot; all happen at the same time. That doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and bitterly added//</span><br />I&#039;m seeing a lot of these -ly adverbs. Some are okay, but it doesn&#039;t take many to make the story telly. See the section at the top of this thread on show versus tell. To paraphrase, I have no indication of her mood here except for that one word. It&#039;s better to get me to interpret her mood through details of how she looks and acts, and what inflections she makes in her speech. Show me what and observer would note about her, not what conclusions he would draw from what he sees.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Somber couldn’t help but laugh at her plight//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nobles were notorious for never being able to swallow their pride, and even Gloriana was no exception.//</span><br />This is a rather subjective statement, but I have no idea who holds the perspective here, so I don&#039;t know whose opinion it is. It&#039;s a fine point, but if you instead phrase it as &quot;The populace commonly considered nobles to be notorious…&quot; then you&#039;ve changed it from the narrator&#039;s opinion to a statement of fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“It’s okay” he assured her.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Stallion//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;ll get to you throughPalace garden.//</span><br />Something&#039;s clearly messed up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She lied down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. Actually, it&#039;s confusion of two different meanings of &quot;lie.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her armed held//</span><br />Typo, and… she has an arm?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>I must be insane for leaving behind any more nights like this….</i></span><br />A four-dot ellipsis is typical for formal writing, but it&#039;s unusual to see in fiction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He looked down at Gloriana, sliding out from underneath her grasp.//</span><br />Another thing to watch with participles: they&#039;re common candidates for misplaced modifiers. Due to their proximity, it sounds like Gloriana is the one &quot;sliding.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that//</span><br />Phrases like this and &quot;at that point&quot; are horribly self-referential to the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he carefully trotted to the window, undoing the latch.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another example of a synchronization issue. He can&#039;t undo the latch at the same time he&#039;s trotting to the window, unless you want to add some language to say he&#039;s doing it with his magic.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Camp Spyrius//</span><br />Another one of these oddly off-putting introductions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cyan coated//</span><br />You&#039;ve done pretty well with hyphenating your compound descriptors, so this may just be an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the shine of his coat dimmed from exhaustion and perspiration//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t perspiration increase the shine?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The unicorn smugly replied “Well isn’t that a first?”//</span><br />Another dialogue punctuation error. There&#039;s a section on this at the top of the thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trying as he tried//</span><br />Looks like you changed your mind and forgot to delete the loser.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but–//</span><br />Looks like you missed one of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;turning to lay down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;?’.//</span><br />Doubled end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;being a unicorn and all//</span><br />You&#039;d capitalized &quot;unicorn&quot; in chapter 1. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Your smart quotes have made the apostrophe backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The cyan stallion//</span><br />You&#039;re using this phrase quite a lot. See the section at the top of this thread on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half-heartedly//</span><br />halfheartedly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the atmosphere of the camp was filled with fear; the fear of certain death.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause anywhere after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little more than police officers, and with the low crime rate they did little more than//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;three-dozen//</span><br />No reason to hyphenate that.<br /><br />The writing here was mostly good. The dialogue was well done, and while the narration had a few nice turns of phrase, it felt stiff and unnatural in places. The story itself is fine—it&#039;s more that there are so many of these niggling errors. I&#039;d say the two major ones are the flighty narrator and the overabundance of participial phrases, sometimes several in one sentence, which can also cause timing problems and be misplaced modifiers.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 53

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Applejack stares up into the azure sea searching for just one single nimbus; a beacon of hope to light the fetid dark disaster of her wilting crop.//

Participial phrases ("searching for just one single nimbus") are normally set off with commas. Furthermore, they're prime candidates for misplaced modifiers. Due to its placement in the sentence, it sounds like the "azure sea" is searching, not Applejack. Finally, the semicolon is misused; there is no independent clause anywhere after it.

>if just a few trees could survive this terrible drought//

Given that the weather over Sweet Apple Acres is controlled by pegasi, why would they have let it get this bad? It bears some explanation.

>The leaves have long ago lost their luscious hues and all about reeks with the silent air of decay.//

See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>An’ plenty of it.//

Here's your problem with Applejack's section in a nutshell. If you'd kept the narrator completely objective, I could have at least understood the desire to write in this purple a fashion. But you had the narrator himself delve into her thoughts and present them as his own, and especially here, where you even have him take on her voice. It's a good idea anyway to have a narrator adopt the focus character's general word choice and intelligence level when being subjectively in that character's viewpoint, but especially when you effectively make that character the narrator. In short, this section is supposed to be Applejack communicating her thoughts to me, but it sounds nothing like her. Pinkie was marginally better, and Dash's daytime section was actually convincing. Rarity's and Twilight's parts fit them well enough.

>She has to water the trees, the crop, she cannot spare long from their side, only long enough to sleep a couple of hours//

Comma splices abound. I can appreciate taking some artistic license in ignoring grammatical rules, but they have to be for a purpose. I don't see one here. Rambling on like this tends to communicate that a character is becoming unfocused or upset, and while I can believe she would be, given the situation, there's nothing in the narration to indicate she feels that way. Convince me that she's feeling desperate, and this kind of speech might flow more naturally.

>But…there were normally orders, orders for her scrim-scrumptious sweetastic treats…nopony seemed hungerful in this silly-solly heatwave…still, it can’t hurt to keep plenty of fantastic delights on the go, just in case…just in case somepony comes in; it doesn’t do to have a happy shop short of munchables.//

This is just too much. You have at least four sentences shoved together with ellipses in what seems to be attempting a deep stream-of-consciousness style (which you also tried at the end of Applejack's part in an odd switch of tactics) that's difficult to pull off and keep interesting. Word to the wise: many readers find this irritating.

>door - the stench//

Please use proper dashes.

>why can’t you help them Fluttershy?//

Missing comma for direct address.

>The fire crackles mirthlessly as the shadows pressed//

Verb tense inconsistency.

>to say: “you are nothing.//

Missed capitalization.

>‘cause//

Smart quotes always draw leading apostrophes in the wrong direction. You'll have to force it. There's more than one of these.

>She can’t stop looking, so she looks at the fire…try not to close your eyes, just keep looking, got to keep looking.//

See, this is another dissonance you have going with your narrator. You switch between indirect and direct though in a single sentence, yet you don't punctuate or italicize the latter as such.

>so inspiring!!//

A single exclamation mark will do nicely.

>Sigh.//

The way you have it, she actually thinks this word instead of doing it.

>being the only other unicorn, Rarity is the node of correspondence//

Why would this be the case? Twilight has never shown a preference for unicorns.

I'll be the first to admit that I can be dense about reading between the lines, but here's what I got from your story:

Everyone misses Twilight, and it's sending a ripple effect through Ponyville. Dash can't force herself to do her weather job, either through missing Twilight or wondering what happened to Rarity. The resulting heat wave is keeping anyone from being interested in buying from Pinkie, ruining the crops at Sweet Apple Acres, and driving Fluttershy's animals to seek other dangerous food sources once their normal ones died off.

This requires a lot of suspension of disbelief. First, Rarity's fate is entirely tangential to all this. Who kidnapped her, why has there been no ransom demand, why hasn't Twilight tried corresponding with anyone but her…? When Dash's irresponsibility is severely affecting the livelihood of an entire town, why has nobody stepped in to figure out why and do something about it? Canterlot would really be so blind to as to what's going on in Ponyville? That's horribly irresponsible governing.

I've touched on the narrative voice. It's unnecessarily purple, particularly for characters that I could never envision thinking in those terms. It creates a huge distance between the character and the reader, particularly since much of this narration is in a highly personal viewpoint for each of them. That connection with the characters is what keeps the reader interested. Here, I see the events unfold, but it doesn't make me care what happens for their sake. When canon Dash thinks "tenacity" is a sneeze, yet you have her using words like "mirthlessly," all I can think is that this isn't Dash.

The stream-of-consciousness style was also off-putting, as only Fluttershy's section placed her in a situation where she would be speaing more off-the-cuff, without time to organize her thoughts. It became irritating to read, and the overabundance of ellipses stringing together multiple sentences into one detracted from the readability in an unjustified way, in my opinion.

Lastly, besides the bit I think I discerned from reading between the lines, anything of the plot from this story has already occurred. In the story itself, nothing happens. It's just a parade of each of the main characters lamenting their current situation. There's also the concept of "piling on." Sadness works best in contrast. If you just have sad after sad after sad, it diminishes the impact of the whole thing. In your favor, Twilight wasn't down, and Pinkie kept a positive attitude, but those weren't actually happy events; Pinkie was just exercising mood control, and Twilight was merely ignorant of the situation. What's at stake in the story that leads to a resolution? What characters deal with a challenge and change or give us insight into them as a result? This plays as a fair enough series of scenes, but not so much as a story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack stares up into the azure sea searching for just one single nimbus; a beacon of hope to light the fetid dark disaster of her wilting crop.//</span><br />Participial phrases (&quot;searching for just one single nimbus&quot;) are normally set off with commas. Furthermore, they&#039;re prime candidates for misplaced modifiers. Due to its placement in the sentence, it sounds like the &quot;azure sea&quot; is searching, not Applejack. Finally, the semicolon is misused; there is no independent clause anywhere after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if just a few trees could survive this terrible drought//</span><br />Given that the weather over Sweet Apple Acres is controlled by pegasi, why would they have let it get this bad? It bears some explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The leaves have long ago lost their luscious hues and all about reeks with the silent air of decay.//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;An’ plenty of it.//</span><br />Here&#039;s your problem with Applejack&#039;s section in a nutshell. If you&#039;d kept the narrator completely objective, I could have at least understood the desire to write in this purple a fashion. But you had the narrator himself delve into her thoughts and present them as his own, and especially here, where you even have him take on her voice. It&#039;s a good idea anyway to have a narrator adopt the focus character&#039;s general word choice and intelligence level when being subjectively in that character&#039;s viewpoint, but especially when you effectively make that character the narrator. In short, this section is supposed to be Applejack communicating her thoughts to me, but it sounds nothing like her. Pinkie was marginally better, and Dash&#039;s daytime section was actually convincing. Rarity&#039;s and Twilight&#039;s parts fit them well enough.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She has to water the trees, the crop, she cannot spare long from their side, only long enough to sleep a couple of hours//</span><br />Comma splices abound. I can appreciate taking some artistic license in ignoring grammatical rules, but they have to be for a purpose. I don&#039;t see one here. Rambling on like this tends to communicate that a character is becoming unfocused or upset, and while I can believe she would be, given the situation, there&#039;s nothing in the narration to indicate she feels that way. Convince me that she&#039;s feeling desperate, and this kind of speech might flow more naturally.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But…there were normally orders, orders for her scrim-scrumptious sweetastic treats…nopony seemed hungerful in this silly-solly heatwave…still, it can’t hurt to keep plenty of fantastic delights on the go, just in case…just in case somepony comes in; it doesn’t do to have a happy shop short of munchables.//</span><br />This is just too much. You have at least four sentences shoved together with ellipses in what seems to be attempting a deep stream-of-consciousness style (which you also tried at the end of Applejack&#039;s part in an odd switch of tactics) that&#039;s difficult to pull off and keep interesting. Word to the wise: many readers find this irritating.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;door - the stench//</span><br />Please use proper dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;why can’t you help them Fluttershy?//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The fire crackles mirthlessly as the shadows pressed//</span><br />Verb tense inconsistency.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to say: “<i>you are nothing</i>.//</span><br />Missed capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br />Smart quotes always draw leading apostrophes in the wrong direction. You&#039;ll have to force it. There&#039;s more than one of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She can’t stop looking, so she looks at the fire…try not to close your eyes, just keep looking, got to keep looking.//</span><br />See, this is another dissonance you have going with your narrator. You switch between indirect and direct though in a single sentence, yet you don&#039;t punctuate or italicize the latter as such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so inspiring!!//</span><br />A single exclamation mark will do nicely.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Sigh</i>.//</span><br />The way you have it, she actually thinks this word instead of doing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;being the only other unicorn, Rarity is the node of correspondence//</span><br />Why would this be the case? Twilight has never shown a preference for unicorns.<br /><br />I&#039;ll be the first to admit that I can be dense about reading between the lines, but here&#039;s what I got from your story:<br /><br />Everyone misses Twilight, and it&#039;s sending a ripple effect through Ponyville. Dash can&#039;t force herself to do her weather job, either through missing Twilight or wondering what happened to Rarity. The resulting heat wave is keeping anyone from being interested in buying from Pinkie, ruining the crops at Sweet Apple Acres, and driving Fluttershy&#039;s animals to seek other dangerous food sources once their normal ones died off.<br /><br />This requires a lot of suspension of disbelief. First, Rarity&#039;s fate is entirely tangential to all this. Who kidnapped her, why has there been no ransom demand, why hasn&#039;t Twilight tried corresponding with anyone but her…? When Dash&#039;s irresponsibility is severely affecting the livelihood of an entire town, why has nobody stepped in to figure out why and do something about it? Canterlot would really be so blind to as to what&#039;s going on in Ponyville? That&#039;s horribly irresponsible governing.<br /><br />I&#039;ve touched on the narrative voice. It&#039;s unnecessarily purple, particularly for characters that I could never envision thinking in those terms. It creates a huge distance between the character and the reader, particularly since much of this narration is in a highly personal viewpoint for each of them. That connection with the characters is what keeps the reader interested. Here, I see the events unfold, but it doesn&#039;t make me care what happens for their sake. When canon Dash thinks &quot;tenacity&quot; is a sneeze, yet you have her using words like &quot;mirthlessly,&quot; all I can think is that this isn&#039;t Dash.<br /><br />The stream-of-consciousness style was also off-putting, as only Fluttershy&#039;s section placed her in a situation where she would be speaing more off-the-cuff, without time to organize her thoughts. It became irritating to read, and the overabundance of ellipses stringing together multiple sentences into one detracted from the readability in an unjustified way, in my opinion.<br /><br />Lastly, besides the bit I think I discerned from reading between the lines, anything of the plot from this story has already occurred. In the story itself, nothing happens. It&#039;s just a parade of each of the main characters lamenting their current situation. There&#039;s also the concept of &quot;piling on.&quot; Sadness works best in contrast. If you just have sad after sad after sad, it diminishes the impact of the whole thing. In your favor, Twilight wasn&#039;t down, and Pinkie kept a positive attitude, but those weren&#039;t actually happy events; Pinkie was just exercising mood control, and Twilight was merely ignorant of the situation. What&#039;s at stake in the story that leads to a resolution? What characters deal with a challenge and change or give us insight into them as a result? This plays as a fair enough series of scenes, but not so much as a story.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 54

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:

>Hearths Warming Tree//

Hearth's Warming. And why is "Tree" capitalized?

Story:

>Rainbow Dash wheeled through the air above the Everfree Forest, sending up light flurries of fresh snow in her wake.//

This one isn't too bad, but this is something you need to keep in mind as a writer. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object (unless they start a clause—then, the subject). So it sounds like the forest is sending up flurries. We can apply a bit of logic to sort things out, but if you don't watch yourself, you will eventually end up saying something that is misleading or ambiguous.

>so the melted snow wouldn’t ruin it//

Wait, what's melting the snow? When Dash flew by, the snow didn't drip down—it drifted. Besides, melting snow wouldn't ruin her hat. Its function is to shield her from the weather, so it's perfectly capable of getting wet. If it was that much of a problem, why did she wear it out in the snow in the first place, or walk under snowy trees?

>and just before she hit the ground//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>blowing piles of snow into the air, coming to gentle landing just in front of Applejack//

Missing a word in there, and it's awkward to stack up two participles like this. You could just put an "and" in there to make it a compound one, but… also note that participles imply that things happen at the same time, so she's snapping out her wings, blowing piles of snow, and coming to a landing all simultaneously. That doesn't work.

>“I’m sorry, it’s just . . . your face!”//

And am I allowed to see this face, or do I have to take the narrator's word that it was funny?

>Hearths Warming//

Hearth's Warming

>and she wants a big one this year of us to decorate//

I think you meant "for."

>There was a pause.//

This has got to be one of the dullest sentences that somehow get used all the time. What happens during this pause?

>“Then yeah, it’s better.”//

The conversation that ends her is just a little bit "talking heads" (there's a section explaining that at the top of this thread). More importantly, we're not getting much in the way of characterization here. Everything's sterile action; show me a few indications of their moods, how they're feeling.

>Rainbow Dash loped ahead of Applejack, sometimes fluttering her wings a little, but she didn’t take off once the wind really started up.//

Here's a participle that would be truly ambiguous, except that only one of them has wings, so it has to be Dash who is "fluttering," though grammatically, Applejack's indicated. If they were both pegasi, I wouldn't know which one you meant.

>It’s not like I asked, you just showed up this morning.//

Comma splice.

>Applejack waved nodded.//

Huh?

>Her ears, though, stung and her nose felt numb.//

See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>I’ll drag it by myself, if you want to.//

If she wants to what? I can't tell what you're trying to say, but I'm guessing you just need to go without that "to."

>The pine needles tickled when they brushed over Applejack’s fur.//

Again, a very factual statement where you could have used it to create a fun moment. How does it feel? How does she react?

>drifting down to the Everfree Forest below//

You were with the ponies, so this is a jarring shift of perspective, essentially into the snowflakes' point of view, but it'd fix it if you just removed "below."

>a few made it down to them//

Watch your word repetition. This is the third "down" in this paragraph alone.

>A thick bed of pine needles surrounded the base//

If it's dropped its needles already, how would it make a good Hearth's Warming tree? And they're not old needles—it's snowed recently, but they're not covered.

>Rainbow smiled.//

That's really been your go-to body language.Give me some more variety, in word choice at least, and preferably in what they do.

>She’s gonna side.//

Maybe that's just an expression unfamiliar to me, but I don't know what this means.

>Applejack felt a sweat beginning to build up, which was a strange sort of sensation to her.//

Certainly an industrious pony like her is used to working during the winter. This shouldn't be anything new to her.

>Applejack indicated to the tree.//

Fine point, but "indicating the tree" means she's pointing to it. "Indicating for the tree" means she's calling something to the tree's attention.

>It was hard to see anymore than a few feet in any direction//

In this usage "any more" needs to be two words.

>the tree was laying sideways//

Lay/lie confusion.

>W-We’re//

Unless there's some other reason to capitalize the word (it's a proper noun, for instance), you only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>“Th-The cold, I don’t like it. I don’t like it one bit.”//

Wait, what? She's a weather pony. And during Winter Wrap Up, ponies of all kinds are seen out in the snow without much clothing. This is also a rather sudden change in her. I'm left more confused than anything.

>When I was a filly, I flew up too high and . . . it was so cold, Applejack.//

I don't get it. This wouldn't be a sudden thing. Temperature changes with altitude very gradually, and all she'd have to do to get out of it would be to dive back down. This might bear some more solid justification.

>We’re stuck here, that’s what.//

Or… they could leave the tree behind for now. This is invented drama. There's no reason they have to stay there.

>He told me, that if I ever felt too cold//

Why in the world is that comma there?

>tied Rainbow down//

And if the tree rolls while it's sliding?

>brought it down in massive blow//

Missing word.

>The tree picked up speed going down the hill, and soon the wind and snow were nothing more than annoyances that were blowing past the speeding trunk.//

I'm not bothering to point out much of the word repetition here—you'll need to hunt those by yourself—but two uses of "speed" in the same sentence.

I mentioned the "talking heads" once, and it did pop up in the story a few more times. You want to keep the reader involved in the story, so make a constant effort to put their emotions on display. Dialogue is one way of doing that, but you have to deliver in a variety of ways—dialogue alone gets stale.

I mentioned the repetition, too, and I wanted to point out a few words that you used an awful lot, because they're common ones for that problem. 32 instances of "just." That's not a ton, but there are places where you use several with a couple of paragraphs, which makes it stand out more. 26 instances of "began" or "started." That really is too many. Inexperienced authors use these all the time. It's obvious that any given action would start. It's only worth calling attention to the beginning when it's sudden or the action gets interrupted. Otherwise, it's an empty verb. Finally, I only looked for the most common forms, but you had 92. That's a lot for this word count. First, it can mean you're using too much passive voice, some of which I did see. Second, it can indicate telly language, though I didn't really see much—more on that later. And third, it can mean that you need to choose more active verbs. And that's really the thing here. "To be" is really a boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. Action is dynamic; being is static. It's impractical to remove them all, but I bet you could reduce that significantly, and your story would be better for it.

Lastly, the major conflict here felt quite contrived. It would seem to be inherent in a pegasus to have resistance to cold, or how else would they do their jobs effectively? You might need to come up with a more believable conflict. Perhaps it's getting late and Dash is afraid of the dark, or she's terrified of some animal noises she hears or something. I'm just spitballing here, but it's going to be difficult to sell "Dash can't take the cold" without a lot of explanation as to why.

So what went right? Well, I didn't catch you being telly, which is always a good thing. You have a good sense of their voices; I found that the dialogue fit them well. Those are some of the tougher things to get right, so the writing's not bad.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearths Warming Tree//</span><br />Hearth&#039;s Warming. And why is &quot;Tree&quot; capitalized?<br /><br />Story:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash wheeled through the air above the Everfree Forest, sending up light flurries of fresh snow in her wake.//</span><br />This one isn&#039;t too bad, but this is something you need to keep in mind as a writer. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object (unless they start a clause—then, the subject). So it sounds like the forest is sending up flurries. We can apply a bit of logic to sort things out, but if you don&#039;t watch yourself, you will eventually end up saying something that is misleading or ambiguous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so the melted snow wouldn’t ruin it//</span><br />Wait, what&#039;s melting the snow? When Dash flew by, the snow didn&#039;t drip down—it drifted. Besides, melting snow wouldn&#039;t ruin her hat. Its function is to shield her from the weather, so it&#039;s perfectly capable of getting wet. If it was that much of a problem, why did she wear it out in the snow in the first place, or walk under snowy trees?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and just before she hit the ground//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blowing piles of snow into the air, coming to gentle landing just in front of Applejack//</span><br />Missing a word in there, and it&#039;s awkward to stack up two participles like this. You could just put an &quot;and&quot; in there to make it a compound one, but… also note that participles imply that things happen at the same time, so she&#039;s snapping out her wings, blowing piles of snow, and coming to a landing all simultaneously. That doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I’m sorry, it’s just . . . your face!”//</span><br />And am I allowed to see this face, or do I have to take the narrator&#039;s word that it was funny?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearths Warming//</span><br />Hearth&#039;s Warming<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she wants a big one this year of us to decorate//</span><br />I think you meant &quot;for.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was a pause.//</span><br />This has got to be one of the dullest sentences that somehow get used all the time. What happens during this pause?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Then yeah, it’s better.”//</span><br />The conversation that ends her is just a little bit &quot;talking heads&quot; (there&#039;s a section explaining that at the top of this thread). More importantly, we&#039;re not getting much in the way of characterization here. Everything&#039;s sterile action; show me a few indications of their moods, how they&#039;re feeling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash loped ahead of Applejack, sometimes fluttering her wings a little, but she didn’t take off once the wind really started up.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a participle that would be truly ambiguous, except that only one of them has wings, so it has to be Dash who is &quot;fluttering,&quot; though grammatically, Applejack&#039;s indicated. If they were both pegasi, I wouldn&#039;t know which one you meant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s not like I asked, you just showed up this morning.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack waved nodded.//</span><br />Huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her ears, though, stung and her nose felt numb.//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ll drag it by myself, if you want to.//</span><br />If she wants to what? I can&#039;t tell what you&#039;re trying to say, but I&#039;m guessing you just need to go without that &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pine needles tickled when they brushed over Applejack’s fur.//</span><br />Again, a very factual statement where you could have used it to create a fun moment. How does it feel? How does she react?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;drifting down to the Everfree Forest below//</span><br />You were with the ponies, so this is a jarring shift of perspective, essentially into the snowflakes&#039; point of view, but it&#039;d fix it if you just removed &quot;below.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a few made it down to them//</span><br />Watch your word repetition. This is the third &quot;down&quot; in this paragraph alone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A thick bed of pine needles surrounded the base//</span><br />If it&#039;s dropped its needles already, how would it make a good Hearth&#039;s Warming tree? And they&#039;re not old needles—it&#039;s snowed recently, but they&#039;re not covered.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow smiled.//</span><br />That&#039;s really been your go-to body language.Give me some more variety, in word choice at least, and preferably in what they do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She’s gonna side.//</span><br />Maybe that&#039;s just an expression unfamiliar to me, but I don&#039;t know what this means.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack felt a sweat beginning to build up, which was a strange sort of sensation to her.//</span><br />Certainly an industrious pony like her is used to working during the winter. This shouldn&#039;t be anything new to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack indicated to the tree.//</span><br />Fine point, but &quot;indicating the tree&quot; means she&#039;s pointing to it. &quot;Indicating for the tree&quot; means she&#039;s calling something to the tree&#039;s attention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was hard to see anymore than a few feet in any direction//</span><br />In this usage &quot;any more&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the tree was laying sideways//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;W-We’re//</span><br />Unless there&#039;s some other reason to capitalize the word (it&#039;s a proper noun, for instance), you only capitalize the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Th-The cold, I don’t like it. I don’t like it one bit.”//</span><br />Wait, what? She&#039;s a weather pony. And during Winter Wrap Up, ponies of all kinds are seen out in the snow without much clothing. This is also a rather sudden change in her. I&#039;m left more confused than anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I was a filly, I flew up too high and . . . it was so cold, Applejack.//</span><br />I don&#039;t get it. This wouldn&#039;t be a sudden thing. Temperature changes with altitude very gradually, and all she&#039;d have to do to get out of it would be to dive back down. This might bear some more solid justification.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We’re stuck here, that’s what.//</span><br />Or… they could leave the tree behind for now. This is invented drama. There&#039;s no reason they have to stay there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He told me, that if I ever felt too cold//</span><br />Why in the world is that comma there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tied Rainbow down//</span><br />And if the tree rolls while it&#039;s sliding?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brought it down in massive blow//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The tree picked up speed going down the hill, and soon the wind and snow were nothing more than annoyances that were blowing past the speeding trunk.//</span><br />I&#039;m not bothering to point out much of the word repetition here—you&#039;ll need to hunt those by yourself—but two uses of &quot;speed&quot; in the same sentence.<br /><br />I mentioned the &quot;talking heads&quot; once, and it did pop up in the story a few more times. You want to keep the reader involved in the story, so make a constant effort to put their emotions on display. Dialogue is one way of doing that, but you have to deliver in a variety of ways—dialogue alone gets stale.<br /><br />I mentioned the repetition, too, and I wanted to point out a few words that you used an awful lot, because they&#039;re common ones for that problem. 32 instances of &quot;just.&quot; That&#039;s not a ton, but there are places where you use several with a couple of paragraphs, which makes it stand out more. 26 instances of &quot;began&quot; or &quot;started.&quot; That really is too many. Inexperienced authors use these all the time. It&#039;s obvious that any given action would start. It&#039;s only worth calling attention to the beginning when it&#039;s sudden or the action gets interrupted. Otherwise, it&#039;s an empty verb. Finally, I only looked for the most common forms, but you had 92. That&#039;s a lot for this word count. First, it can mean you&#039;re using too much passive voice, some of which I did see. Second, it can indicate telly language, though I didn&#039;t really see much—more on that later. And third, it can mean that you need to choose more active verbs. And that&#039;s really the thing here. &quot;To be&quot; is really a boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. Action is dynamic; being is static. It&#039;s impractical to remove them all, but I bet you could reduce that significantly, and your story would be better for it.<br /><br />Lastly, the major conflict here felt quite contrived. It would seem to be inherent in a pegasus to have resistance to cold, or how else would they do their jobs effectively? You might need to come up with a more believable conflict. Perhaps it&#039;s getting late and Dash is afraid of the dark, or she&#039;s terrified of some animal noises she hears or something. I&#039;m just spitballing here, but it&#039;s going to be difficult to sell &quot;Dash can&#039;t take the cold&quot; without a lot of explanation as to why.<br /><br />So what went right? Well, I didn&#039;t catch you being telly, which is always a good thing. You have a good sense of their voices; I found that the dialogue fit them well. Those are some of the tougher things to get right, so the writing&#039;s not bad.<br />

Thank you for your review, I greatly appreciate it. Fluttershy OakleyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 55

>>129270
Edit: This is with regards to the penultimate review on this page

Thank you very much for your carefully considered review, I do appreciate it. Not to be prissy, but some of the grammatical "errors" are but trans-Atlantic miscommunication (certainly, semi-colons are used differently…and "comma use with conjunction" is a comma splice over here. This goes for missing capitalisation and improper dashes too)…but I suppose that's fine : ) Um…I'll take some of what you said quite seriously; the Applejack section *is* rather poor and there's no denying it. If my intended effect wasn't pulled off then it wasn't pulled off (using a crescendo of personality {hence the unfittingness of AJ's section} in the narrative tone, with the ensuing peak and crash at Dash's transition {only to begin once more}, might have been…well, um, a bit much? :D). For instance, the weather situation, the reason for Rarity's kidnap & the lack of intervention *are* all explained…but, I must admit, the reasons are very much, as you put it, "between the lines". I don't…urgh :D I don't make it easy for readers, I'll be the first to admit, but even so…I didn't think the point was invisible. I take it you're not a fan of Beckett? :D Um…seriously though, I really do appreciate your efforts and will think long, and hard, upon your criticisms; this fiction (there *is* a plot but…again, I'm not going to spell it out because I'm difficult :D Even so…it's not a "story" and was never intended to be) is obviously beyond repair but, perhaps, the next needn't be : )
Xxxx

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129270" onclick="return highlight('129270', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129270">&gt;&gt;129270</a><br />Edit: This is with regards to the penultimate review on this page<br /> <br />Thank you very much for your carefully considered review, I do appreciate it. Not to be prissy, but some of the grammatical &quot;errors&quot; are but trans-Atlantic miscommunication (certainly, semi-colons are used differently…and &quot;comma use with conjunction&quot; is a comma splice over here. This goes for missing capitalisation and improper dashes too)…but I suppose that&#039;s fine : ) Um…I&#039;ll take some of what you said quite seriously; the Applejack section *is* rather poor and there&#039;s no denying it. If my intended effect wasn&#039;t pulled off then it wasn&#039;t pulled off (using a crescendo of personality {hence the unfittingness of AJ&#039;s section} in the narrative tone, with the ensuing peak and crash at Dash&#039;s transition {only to begin once more}, might have been…well, um, a bit much? :D). For instance, the weather situation, the reason for Rarity&#039;s kidnap &amp; the lack of intervention *are* all explained…but, I must admit, the reasons are very much, as you put it, &quot;between the lines&quot;. I don&#039;t…urgh :D I don&#039;t make it easy for readers, I&#039;ll be the first to admit, but even so…I didn&#039;t think the point was invisible. I take it you&#039;re not a fan of Beckett? :D Um…seriously though, I really do appreciate your efforts and will think long, and hard, upon your criticisms; this fiction (there *is* a plot but…again, I&#039;m not going to spell it out because I&#039;m difficult :D Even so…it&#039;s not a &quot;story&quot; and was never intended to be) is obviously beyond repair but, perhaps, the next needn&#039;t be : )<br />Xxxx<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Thu, Dec 12th, 2013 03:46</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 56

>>129301
Comma splices are a different thing entirely; at least as far as I understand it from my British colleagues, the American concept is the same. The examples in my section are all compound structures or instances of a dependent clause. Splices occur when a comma separates two parts of a sentence that have independent clauses and any material attached to them. As in:
This is a comma splice, where a dash, period, or semicolon would have worked, it has two independent clauses with only a comma in between.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129301" onclick="return highlight('129301', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129301">&gt;&gt;129301</a><br />Comma splices are a different thing entirely; at least as far as I understand it from my British colleagues, the American concept is the same. The examples in my section are all compound structures or instances of a dependent clause. Splices occur when a comma separates two parts of a sentence that have independent clauses and any material attached to them. As in:<br />This is a comma splice, where a dash, period, or semicolon would have worked, it has two independent clauses with only a comma in between.<br />

Fluttershy OakleyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 57

>>129305
Thank you for the grammatical instruction. Whilst I still feel that no comma should precede an "and" (sparing the Oxford Comma, of course) as this would negate its purpose, perhaps I've been ill informed throughout my education with regards to the specificity of the error…um…ta :D
Xxx<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129305" onclick="return highlight('129305', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129305">&gt;&gt;129305</a><br />Thank you for the grammatical instruction. Whilst I still feel that no comma should precede an &quot;and&quot; (sparing the Oxford Comma, of course) as this would negate its purpose, perhaps I&#039;ve been ill informed throughout my education with regards to the specificity of the error…um…ta :D<br />Xxx<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 58

>>129308
I suggest opening the nearest book on your bookshelf and counting the number of commas preceding "and". I can assure you that it's quite common. The word bears no particular exception to the general rules of comma usage in any English variant that I'm aware of.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129308" onclick="return highlight('129308', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129308">&gt;&gt;129308</a><br />I suggest opening the nearest book on your bookshelf and counting the number of commas preceding &quot;and&quot;. I can assure you that it&#039;s quite common. The word bears no particular exception to the general rules of comma usage in any English variant that I&#039;m aware of.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 59

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Outside, the winter wind drove snow across the yard, building drifts against fences, berms, and buildings, but inside, the farmhouse seemed to sigh in contentment, bundled up against the cold evening.//

It feels a bit repetitive to have participial phrases in both clauses, but also note that the first is misplaced, though not a bad one. Participles like to modify the nearest object in the sentence, so it seems like the yard is building drifts. Like I said, this one isn't bad, since it's not that far from its object, and it's easy to sort out with some logic. But if you're not mindful of it, you will eventually misplace one in such a way that it's ambiguous or genuinely misleading.

>she was in the kitchen, collecting ingredients while the oven preheated.//

Notice that every sentence in this paragraph has nearly identical construction. "X was Y-ing, <participial phrase>." The only exceptions are one instance of an absolute phrase instead of a participle (but which still uses a participial verb form), and a dependent clause leading the final sentence. There are times that such repetition can be used for effect, and I think you're on the edge of that, it's not obviously anything more than an oversight.

>She only had her favorite pie once a year, when her friends were otherwise occupied with their own lives, their own families, and so no one save the Apples had ever seen her enjoy her favorite pie.//

Starting and ending the sentence with "her favorite pie" again doesn't have any stylistic purpose I can find, so it just comes across as careless repetition.

>and ushered Applejack from the room, shutting the door behind them//

Here's another issue with participles: they imply concurrent action. Here, she wouldn't shut the door until after she'd ushered AJ out.

>She watched with interest an hour later//

I can't help but feel like skipping the wait is glossing over what could have been a cute moment.

>pony-back rides were enjoyed//

I don't see the purpose in the passive voice here. In addition to being static, they shift focus, and there's no clear reason here as to why you'd want the reader to notice the pony-back rides more so than AJ or the verb. I'll also ask: why pony-back? It's not like "piggyback" is anything related to human anatomy. Not a big deal, but I just found it strange.

>The pecans had risen to the top and been toasted by the oven’s heat, shining with a patina of sugary coating.//

Again, why the passive voice? Try "…to the top and toasted in the oven's heat…" That's an active construct, and it loses no meaning. Another misplaced modifier, too: it sounds like the heat is shining.

>She looked around and saw everyone else already taking bites of their own slices of pie, their eyes falling shut in expressions of bliss.//

First, I'd like to see these "expressions of bliss." Getting me to conclude that from the cues you provide will leave much more of an impression than just having you tell me that's how they feel. Second, another note about repetition. This is the third straight sentence that begins with "she," again without a stylistic reason for doing so. And every sentence in the paragraph starts with the subject. This simple structure will likely prevail, but work in a variation here and there.

>They would go through the pecan halves her father brought home from the market, taking care to select only the best specimens for inclusion//

And here we go. This one is genuinely ambiguous. Your participial phrase "taking care…" could refer either to what the mares are doing in the kitchen or what the father did at the market. I believe you mean the mares, but the father is more clearly indicated. Then you stack up another participle after it. Better to use and "and" to make it a compound one than have two separate ones in series.

>for it was out of season yet welcome all the same,//

Dependent clauses like this are usually set off with commas at both ends.

>with young Apple Bloom//

Another case of feeling like you've glossed over something important. Why wait until now to bring her up? Wouldn't AJ have a memory of her mother baking a pie while having to take care of an infant Apple Bloom, or perhaps while pregnant with her?

>She found the pie plate, the mixing bowl, the whisk in their usual places. She carefully selected the best pecan halves from the small supply in the pantry; she peered into the glass measuring cup as she poured sugar.//

Besides the repetitiveness of beginning all of these clauses with "she," consider the following: All three of these sentences convey the same type of information. Non stands out more than the others in importance. So why are two connected with a semicolon, as if closely linked thoughts, one flowing into the other, while the remaining one is left out? It makes the narration a bit choppy.

>When she slid the pie into the oven, she went and sat at the door to the kitchen//

I'd argue that's an "after," not a "when."

>‘til//

Your smart quotes drew the apostrophe backward. They will always do this for a leading apostrophe. Paste one in, or add one after it and delete the first.

>Apple Bloom looked down at hers. She’d been too young to have any last year.//

Ah, so she was around the previous year! Would have been nice to see her woven into the memory of it, then.

First, you are correct that we can allow stories below the word count limit, as long as we're convinced they're good enough to warrant the exception. The further below the threshold they are, the more they need to stand out, and you're pretty far below. I think I've made a few suggestions that would help you add to the story without resorting to meaningless filler, which is obviously the wrong thing to do—we see too many stories barely above the limit that have clearly done this.

So, I liked this story. It was a nice take on this family tradition, but not without its problems. There was quite a bit of repetition, and one further example I hadn't pointed out: you used various forms of "to be" over 40 times. That's about one every third sentence. This is an inherently boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. A few of these are tied up in the handful of times I pointed out telly language or passive voice, but for the most part, you need to choose more active verbs.

For the most part, you had a light touch with the emotions, which is nice, but with a story this short and with such strong overtones, it doesn't take much telling to ruin the effect. Just remember to place yourself as an observer and show me only what you perceive, not what you conclude from those observations. You can show me her tears; don't tell me she's sad. You can show me that she's hopping around; don't tell me she's happy. That's not a complete ban, of course, but you get the picture. You get much more from watching a character act sad in a movie than you would if he just turned to the camera and announced that he was sad. You spend a good amount of time describing the surroundings, but I would like a bit more about how these character feel about things—ultimately, that's what connects them with the reader.

The last bit I have to say is the one I'm least sure about, because you're closer to the edge here even than with the other issues. I'll be blunt: this plays more as a scene than a story. There's no conflict built up with something put at stake. We don't see a character striving to get something and then resolving that struggle. Absent conflict, a story can also provide character growth. We see someone changed by an experience, with the "before" contrasted against the "after." I don't really see that here, either. There's no "aha!" moment where we discover something new about AJ's character, or where she makes a decision that will alter her life appreciably. Things happen to her, and she goes with the flow. And so it goes. Poo tee weet.

Now, if you delved into why she wants to keep this a secret (especially after she did bake for them the one year, which is odd), and maybe she wrestles with her reasons, or maybe if she wants to pass on the tradition to Apple Bloom, you might have something. That's not to say that it's impossible to write an engaging story without conflict or character growth, but it is difficult. Since you were inspired to write this story, maybe no such angle would mesh with your vision of what you want your story to be, and if so, that's fine. I'd have to put some serious thought into whether it could stand well enough as is, or maybe get another opinion on it. In any case, I do want you to address the other points I brought up, and give this some thought. You've obviously got my interest, or I wouldn't have written so much about such a short story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Outside, the winter wind drove snow across the yard, building drifts against fences, berms, and buildings, but inside, the farmhouse seemed to sigh in contentment, bundled up against the cold evening.//</span><br />It feels a bit repetitive to have participial phrases in both clauses, but also note that the first is misplaced, though not a bad one. Participles like to modify the nearest object in the sentence, so it seems like the yard is building drifts. Like I said, this one isn&#039;t bad, since it&#039;s not that far from its object, and it&#039;s easy to sort out with some logic. But if you&#039;re not mindful of it, you will eventually misplace one in such a way that it&#039;s ambiguous or genuinely misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was in the kitchen, collecting ingredients while the oven preheated.//</span><br />Notice that every sentence in this paragraph has nearly identical construction. &quot;X was Y-ing, &lt;participial phrase&gt;.&quot; The only exceptions are one instance of an absolute phrase instead of a participle (but which still uses a participial verb form), and a dependent clause leading the final sentence. There are times that such repetition can be used for effect, and I think you&#039;re on the edge of that, it&#039;s not obviously anything more than an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She only had her favorite pie once a year, when her friends were otherwise occupied with their own lives, their own families, and so no one save the Apples had ever seen her enjoy her favorite pie.//</span><br />Starting and ending the sentence with &quot;her favorite pie&quot; again doesn&#039;t have any stylistic purpose I can find, so it just comes across as careless repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and ushered Applejack from the room, shutting the door behind them//</span><br />Here&#039;s another issue with participles: they imply concurrent action. Here, she wouldn&#039;t shut the door until after she&#039;d ushered AJ out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She watched with interest an hour later//</span><br />I can&#039;t help but feel like skipping the wait is glossing over what could have been a cute moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pony-back rides were enjoyed//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the purpose in the passive voice here. In addition to being static, they shift focus, and there&#039;s no clear reason here as to why you&#039;d want the reader to notice the pony-back rides more so than AJ or the verb. I&#039;ll also ask: why pony-back? It&#039;s not like &quot;piggyback&quot; is anything related to human anatomy. Not a big deal, but I just found it strange.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pecans had risen to the top and been toasted by the oven’s heat, shining with a patina of sugary coating.//</span><br />Again, why the passive voice? Try &quot;…to the top and toasted in the oven&#039;s heat…&quot; That&#039;s an active construct, and it loses no meaning. Another misplaced modifier, too: it sounds like the heat is shining.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked around and saw everyone else already taking bites of their own slices of pie, their eyes falling shut in expressions of bliss.//</span><br />First, I&#039;d like to see these &quot;expressions of bliss.&quot; Getting me to conclude that from the cues you provide will leave much more of an impression than just having you tell me that&#039;s how they feel. Second, another note about repetition. This is the third straight sentence that begins with &quot;she,&quot; again without a stylistic reason for doing so. And every sentence in the paragraph starts with the subject. This simple structure will likely prevail, but work in a variation here and there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They would go through the pecan halves her father brought home from the market, taking care to select only the best specimens for inclusion//</span><br />And here we go. This one is genuinely ambiguous. Your participial phrase &quot;taking care…&quot; could refer either to what the mares are doing in the kitchen or what the father did at the market. I believe you mean the mares, but the father is more clearly indicated. Then you stack up another participle after it. Better to use and &quot;and&quot; to make it a compound one than have two separate ones in series.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for it was out of season yet welcome all the same,//</span><br />Dependent clauses like this are usually set off with commas at both ends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with young Apple Bloom//</span><br />Another case of feeling like you&#039;ve glossed over something important. Why wait until now to bring her up? Wouldn&#039;t AJ have a memory of her mother baking a pie while having to take care of an infant Apple Bloom, or perhaps while pregnant with her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She found the pie plate, the mixing bowl, the whisk in their usual places. She carefully selected the best pecan halves from the small supply in the pantry; she peered into the glass measuring cup as she poured sugar.//</span><br />Besides the repetitiveness of beginning all of these clauses with &quot;she,&quot; consider the following: All three of these sentences convey the same type of information. Non stands out more than the others in importance. So why are two connected with a semicolon, as if closely linked thoughts, one flowing into the other, while the remaining one is left out? It makes the narration a bit choppy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When she slid the pie into the oven, she went and sat at the door to the kitchen//</span><br />I&#039;d argue that&#039;s an &quot;after,&quot; not a &quot;when.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘til//</span><br />Your smart quotes drew the apostrophe backward. They will always do this for a leading apostrophe. Paste one in, or add one after it and delete the first.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom looked down at hers. She’d been too young to have any last year.//</span><br />Ah, so she <i>was</i> around the previous year! Would have been nice to see her woven into the memory of it, then.<br /><br />First, you are correct that we can allow stories below the word count limit, as long as we&#039;re convinced they&#039;re good enough to warrant the exception. The further below the threshold they are, the more they need to stand out, and you&#039;re pretty far below. I think I&#039;ve made a few suggestions that would help you add to the story without resorting to meaningless filler, which is obviously the wrong thing to do—we see too many stories barely above the limit that have clearly done this.<br /><br />So, I liked this story. It was a nice take on this family tradition, but not without its problems. There was quite a bit of repetition, and one further example I hadn&#039;t pointed out: you used various forms of &quot;to be&quot; over 40 times. That&#039;s about one every third sentence. This is an inherently boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply <i>is</i>. A few of these are tied up in the handful of times I pointed out telly language or passive voice, but for the most part, you need to choose more active verbs.<br /><br />For the most part, you had a light touch with the emotions, which is nice, but with a story this short and with such strong overtones, it doesn&#039;t take much telling to ruin the effect. Just remember to place yourself as an observer and show me only what you perceive, not what you conclude from those observations. You can show me her tears; don&#039;t tell me she&#039;s sad. You can show me that she&#039;s hopping around; don&#039;t tell me she&#039;s happy. That&#039;s not a complete ban, of course, but you get the picture. You get much more from watching a character act sad in a movie than you would if he just turned to the camera and announced that he was sad. You spend a good amount of time describing the surroundings, but I would like a bit more about how these character feel about things—ultimately, that&#039;s what connects them with the reader.<br /><br />The last bit I have to say is the one I&#039;m least sure about, because you&#039;re closer to the edge here even than with the other issues. I&#039;ll be blunt: this plays more as a scene than a story. There&#039;s no conflict built up with something put at stake. We don&#039;t see a character striving to get something and then resolving that struggle. Absent conflict, a story can also provide character growth. We see someone changed by an experience, with the &quot;before&quot; contrasted against the &quot;after.&quot; I don&#039;t really see that here, either. There&#039;s no &quot;aha!&quot; moment where we discover something new about AJ&#039;s character, or where she makes a decision that will alter her life appreciably. Things happen to her, and she goes with the flow. And so it goes. Poo tee weet.<br /><br />Now, if you delved into why she wants to keep this a secret (especially after she did bake for them the one year, which is odd), and maybe she wrestles with her reasons, or maybe if she wants to pass on the tradition to Apple Bloom, you might have something. That&#039;s not to say that it&#039;s impossible to write an engaging story without conflict or character growth, but it is difficult. Since you were inspired to write this story, maybe no such angle would mesh with your vision of what you want your story to be, and if so, that&#039;s fine. I&#039;d have to put some serious thought into whether it could stand well enough as is, or maybe get another opinion on it. In any case, I do want you to address the other points I brought up, and give this some thought. You&#039;ve obviously got my interest, or I wouldn&#039;t have written so much about such a short story.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 60

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First, I'll say that I have high expectations of this story going in, based on the various reputations involved. As a result, I'm going to dig deeper for things to comment on, since it's less "this is what it will take to be accepted for posting" and more "these are my impressions and suggestions for how you could make it even better."

>She merrily returns one full of charisma//

The choice of "charisma" here struck me as odd. First, it's a bit telly, since you don't show me how this looks. I can forgive a bit of telliness here and there, when a moment isn't particularly evocative. I would caution you against doing it much at the beginning of a story, where you're trying to hook the reader. My other reaction was that I don't see any reason for providing this info. Your protagonist doesn't react to it in any way, and "charisma" is the type of thing to produce an emotion or reaction in the observer. It felt incomplete to use that word, but not have the narrator link it to a feeling or action it provokes in her.

>silhouetted building//

I fell like the scene setting is lacking here. "Silhouetted" implies something specific about the lighting, but we're never given any cues about it. It's not until the next sentence that we get a clue as to why—it's storming—but what's backlighting the building? Lightning, dying daylight, streetlamps, …?

>They are talking about something—I wonder if it’s about me—but their voices are lost to howling wind and thunderous rain.//

Another thing that's a good idea to watch, especially early in the story, is overuse of "to be" verbs. Three in this sentence alone, and in my opinion, ones that would be easy to place with active verbs and rephrase. "To be" is an inherently boring verb.

>even though I’m on my haunches//

Dependent clause should be set off with commas on both ends.

>leaving me alone with only this sparse patch of upholstery//

Look how far this participle is from what it modifies, and it's stacked up behind another participle. It leaves the sentence feeling choppy.

>My entire life is written in this book and it’s something only my eyes can see.//

Another spot where you need a comma to separate the clauses. I see a few more of these. Exceptions can be made for the sake of flow, but you're consistently doing this. I have a brief section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Wind surges into the cabin, rustling myself and blowing dirty water into my face.//

That's not the way reflexive pronouns work; they need to have the referenced person or thing as the subject as well. Just use "me" here.

>unabated howl//

You described the wind as "howling" just a few paragraphs back. This is borderline, but beware repeating words or phrases in a close space. The more unusual they are, the more breathing room you need to give them.

>I’m at a loss for capacity//

I have no idea what this means…

>It reminds me a little of the sun flower//

Do you mean sunflower? In either case, "the" implies you're referring to something specific, and I have no idea what that is. Even if you mean a generic sunflower, I don't get the comparison you're trying to make.

Okay, these places where you use colored text… I can't see the word "color." Keep in mind that different users and applications have different background colors, and when you play with them, you run the risk that they won't show up. I'm guessing you made these white (I have a white background). I'm also assuming you did this on purpose so the reader can't see other colors, but beware of making the reader do too much word, i.e., highlighting these words to see what they are. In fact, those colors aren't invisible to her; they're gray. So why didn't you make them gray? Ironically, especially considering an aspect of your story, I'm colorblind and can't see much of the colored text right anyway, so the effect is lost on me.

This brings up a point… Are you colorblind? The way Pinkie describes that she can actually see pink and that other shades appear as shades of gray to her—it doesn't ring true, at least in my experience. You see, I have no frame of reference to know what green really looks like, and while I know intellectually that I see it as a shade of gray, I wouldn't describe it as such. It's simply what green is to me, since I don't know anything else. Yes, I have trouble telling it from the colors I know as red and tan and gray, but it's still green to me.

I'm also at a loss as to why Dash needs to take shelter in the carriage. They're in a street in front of a building. She could have gone inside or under the eaves or something.

>like there’s an expected word on a page that’s mysteriously absent//

And given that this is exactly what you did, it smacks of shouting in the reader's ear: "Hey, you! Notice this! I did this thing!"

>I can tell she doesn’t want to be here as much as I do//

I don't think this says what you meant. You want something closer to: "I can tell she finds her current predicament as distasteful as I do." What you said is that Pinkie likes being here, but Dash is less enthusiastic.

I'm noticing more and more comma splices in the narration. While you have some license insofar as it's essentially dialogue, it's starting to grate on me.

>her gaze fixated out the window//

You're confusing "fixated" with "fixed." She could conceivably be fixated, but it implies a mental process, which her gaze couldn't have.

>To emphasize this she sighs//

To emphasize what? Pinkie's perception of her? This really suggests that Dash does it intentionally because of smoething she'd have no way of knowing.

>Her name feels empty, however rapturous it might be, and I can’t help but feel sympathy for her.//

Watch the repetition of "feel" here. This is a very dangerous word anyway. In a tight perspective like this, you can get away with more telling, but Pinkie seems to be operating on a more stimulus-response level. Rather than jumping to her conclusion, it might work better to show what physical sensations or evoked memories or imagery it brings out in her.

>I release a breath I didn’t know I’ve been holding.//

Yipe. Cliche ahoy.

>rattles the carriage//

This shaking and rattling of the carriage is starting to get repetitive.

>Her happiness does not diminish the slightest//

I think you're missing an "in" here, and I'd really rather you show this part, as it's a pretty critical moment in their becoming friends.

>I follow the motion as best I could//

Inconsistent verb tense.

>clapping her hooves together to emphasize the point//

So she's emphasizing again? Repetitive.

>Arsenopyrite//

Okay, I don't get at all why this is the first thing that'd pop into her mind. It wouldn't be any more unpleasant than any generic rock or dirt, really. It's not a mineral that forms particularly sharp corners or needle-like shapes, or that would be caustic. Maybe something like Whewellite, obsidian, carborundum. For that matter, plain old Halite would hurt like hell. A freshly broken piece of "stinkspat" Fluorite?

>wonderbolt’s//

Given that she's pretty much intuited what this means some time ago, why are you still putting it in lower case?

>I tap my hooves together and look at her shyly.

I'm seeing more of this telly language now. It's not really obtrusive, but you might want to read over the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread and decide if you ought to be forging a deeper connection in places.

>The sky above bellows thunder angrily and is obscured by rainfall.//

And yet you said there was "perpetual darkness." There's some inconsistency as to what they can actually see and not see, including each other.

>ever since I saw the sun flower//

Okay, I guess I'm catching on that this is the Rainboom…

>and myself now curious//

That phrasing just grates on me.

>She trails off//

In most cases, it's bad form to tell me what I can already deduce from the punctuation. Exceptions are common things like "ask" and "shout," but when you use an ellipsis to trail off or a dash for an interruption, you don't need to reiterate that as the speaking action.

>She smiles a brings up a hoof between us.//

Typo.

>“See, you asked me a question…” She brings up her other hoof. “…and then I asked one!”//

The way to wedge a narrative aside into a quote is thus:
“See, you asked me a question—” she brings up her other hoof “—and then I asked one!”

>but my eyes are fixated//

Another odd use of that word…

>I trace my hoof through its tangles, attentive with every motion.//

Watch out for misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the tangles are attentive.

>I see obsidian//

What shade of her tail is so dark as to appear this black?

>sucumb

succumb

>It’s entire population is all pegasi like myself,”—she flexes her wing and it rubs into me—“and when I was a filly

Its/it's confusion. That comma needs to go. And note the difference with the example I gave you earlier. Here, the dashes are with the narration, while in my example, they were with the speech. Both are acceptable. The difference is that in my example, the speaker stops while the aside occurs. It seemed appropriate for that case, and I wonder if it isn't here as well. The form you have here tends to indicate that the speech never stopped.

>her cheerful mood dampers//

Dampens, yes?

>fast enough to break the sound barrier//

Well, in canon occurrences, she's formed a shockwave well before she achieves the rainboom. By estimating it from conical shock tables, she's going about Mach 7 before the rainboom forms. Though I certainly don't expect the animators actually intended that level of detail…

>Even with the hazard billowing just outside the carriage//

Hazard? Okay, you've gone to the thesaurus one too many times.

>She brings her debased eyes back up to mine.//

I don't at all get that word choice. The connotation is way off.

>She looks perplexed//

Show me how this looks. As out-of-touch as Pinkie is with reading emotions in general, having her make the conclusions for me seems even more off-kilter, like her accuracy is tied to narrative convenience.

>for awhile//

"Awhile" and "a while" are pretty interchangeable, but not in this case. The preposition "for" needs an object, so you have to make it two words so there's a noun there to serve that function. I see a few other instances. You might want to Ctrl-f for this.

>I forget what going on in this scene//

Typo.

>Just…!//

I'm not one to complain about question marks or exclamation marks after a dash or question marks after an ellipsis, but this combination has never made sense to me. She's trailing off… emphatically? They have pretty opposite functions.

>all of the sudden//

all of a sudden. You do this again later. Suddenness can be awkward to point out in narration, though. We had no reason to expect she'd be cold, so just leaving this bit off would still generate that effect. In fact, with this lead-in, it feels like she senses it coming on, such that it actually takes away from the suddenness.

>who’s else//

who else's

>my mom wasn’t really…” Her voice trails off//

You're doing that thing again…

>She sighs again//

There's an awful lot of sighing going on in this part of the story.

>Without thinking Rocky rolls out of my hooves and I reach for it as far as I can.//

I get that British convention often doesn't use commas for introductory elements, but I'd suggest one here, or it sounds like "Rocky" is a direct object for "thinking." However, "without thinking" is clearly supposed to modify Pinkie, but she never appears in that clause, only her hooves. So you're saying that Rocky isn't thinking. While I believe you, it isn't particularly illustrative.

>There’re a few more droplets//

There was an earlier spot I let slide where you used "there's" with a plural. But if you're going to use this form here, be consistent.

>a curtain being risen//

Raised. "Rise" doesn't take a direct object.

>weight I hadn’t known I’ve been carrying

Cliche reprised.

>laying in bed//

Lay/lie confusion

>Oh that’s not a problem dear.//

Missing comma for direct address.

First off, this was well written. It didn't feel as long as it actually is. But there are a few things I want to go over.

There were only a few consistent mechanical things: commas between clauses, some mistaken phrasings, etc. Nothing much there, and certainly things you're capable of fixing. Just note that I only marked a couple of examples for each—you'll need to root them out.

I talked some about Pinkie's colorblindness, but I'll touch on it a bit more here, since I've seen how it all plays out now. So, she's never know color, then gets a bunch of it in a burst. It's not like she'd understand it, though. She can see red for that moment, but she doesn't know it's red intrinsically. She'd just know she saw some confusing things she'd never seen before, and now they're gone. Put a little more thought into making this feel authentic.

So, Pinkie is telling this story. And yet you use very dense, florid speech for her. I can't help but feel like this is a story told from the point of view of someone who's interesting, but not Pinkie. She only shares a name and a few details about her life with Pinkie. It's a good idea even in a third-person narration to keep your narrator close to word choice and intelligence level commensurate with your focus character, and that's even more imperative in first-person. This just doesn't sound like Pinkie. Not that Pinkie could never be this introspective and intelligent-sounding, but canon Pinkie is always your starting point. If you want her to be something different, you need to get me there first, or you might as well use an OC. Now there are times when such a disconnect can work, and I'd be inclined to overlook it, were this in third person, but I can help coming back to this: The narrator is supposed to be Pinkie, but sounds nothing like her.

I caught you being telly a few times where I felt it was inopportune, but there weren't too many instances. It's worth a scan over points where the emotion runs high to make sure you're engaging the reader enough.

I didn't at all care for the words colored so they'd be missing. Enhancing the story is one thing, but making it difficult to read is another. You don't want to slow the reader down at all. This is akin to giving very phonetic spellings for a thick accent. Yes, it creates an effect, but it's just irritating to read.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />First, I&#039;ll say that I have high expectations of this story going in, based on the various reputations involved. As a result, I&#039;m going to dig deeper for things to comment on, since it&#039;s less &quot;this is what it will take to be accepted for posting&quot; and more &quot;these are my impressions and suggestions for how you could make it even better.&quot; <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She merrily returns one full of charisma//</span><br />The choice of &quot;charisma&quot; here struck me as odd. First, it&#039;s a bit telly, since you don&#039;t show me how this looks. I can forgive a bit of telliness here and there, when a moment isn&#039;t particularly evocative. I would caution you against doing it much at the beginning of a story, where you&#039;re trying to hook the reader. My other reaction was that I don&#039;t see any reason for providing this info. Your protagonist doesn&#039;t react to it in any way, and &quot;charisma&quot; is the type of thing to produce an emotion or reaction in the observer. It felt incomplete to use that word, but not have the narrator link it to a feeling or action it provokes in her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;silhouetted building//</span><br />I fell like the scene setting is lacking here. &quot;Silhouetted&quot; implies something specific about the lighting, but we&#039;re never given any cues about it. It&#039;s not until the next sentence that we get a clue as to why—it&#039;s storming—but what&#039;s backlighting the building? Lightning, dying daylight, streetlamps, …?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They are talking about something—I wonder if it’s about me—but their voices are lost to howling wind and thunderous rain.//</span><br />Another thing that&#039;s a good idea to watch, especially early in the story, is overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Three in this sentence alone, and in my opinion, ones that would be easy to place with active verbs and rephrase. &quot;To be&quot; is an inherently boring verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even though I’m on my haunches//</span><br />Dependent clause should be set off with commas on both ends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaving me alone with only this sparse patch of upholstery//</span><br />Look how far this participle is from what it modifies, and it&#039;s stacked up behind another participle. It leaves the sentence feeling choppy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My entire life is written in this book and it’s something only my eyes can see.//</span><br />Another spot where you need a comma to separate the clauses. I see a few more of these. Exceptions can be made for the sake of flow, but you&#039;re consistently doing this. I have a brief section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wind surges into the cabin, rustling myself and blowing dirty water into my face.//</span><br />That&#039;s not the way reflexive pronouns work; they need to have the referenced person or thing as the subject as well. Just use &quot;me&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unabated howl//</span><br />You described the wind as &quot;howling&quot; just a few paragraphs back. This is borderline, but beware repeating words or phrases in a close space. The more unusual they are, the more breathing room you need to give them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m at a loss for capacity//</span><br />I have no idea what this means…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It reminds me a little of the sun flower//</span><br />Do you mean sunflower? In either case, &quot;the&quot; implies you&#039;re referring to something specific, and I have no idea what that is. Even if you mean a generic sunflower, I don&#039;t get the comparison you&#039;re trying to make.<br /><br />Okay, these places where you use colored text… I can&#039;t see the word &quot;color.&quot; Keep in mind that different users and applications have different background colors, and when you play with them, you run the risk that they won&#039;t show up. I&#039;m guessing you made these white (I have a white background). I&#039;m also assuming you did this on purpose so the reader can&#039;t see other colors, but beware of making the reader do too much word, i.e., highlighting these words to see what they are. In fact, those colors aren&#039;t invisible to her; they&#039;re gray. So why didn&#039;t you make them gray? Ironically, especially considering an aspect of your story, I&#039;m colorblind and can&#039;t see much of the colored text right anyway, so the effect is lost on me.<br /><br />This brings up a point… Are you colorblind? The way Pinkie describes that she can actually see pink and that other shades appear as shades of gray to her—it doesn&#039;t ring true, at least in my experience. You see, I have no frame of reference to know what green really looks like, and while I know intellectually that I see it as a shade of gray, I wouldn&#039;t describe it as such. It&#039;s simply what green <i>is</i> to me, since I don&#039;t know anything else. Yes, I have trouble telling it from the colors I know as red and tan and gray, but it&#039;s still green to me.<br /><br />I&#039;m also at a loss as to why Dash needs to take shelter in the carriage. They&#039;re in a street in front of a building. She could have gone inside or under the eaves or something.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like there’s an expected word on a page that’s mysteriously absent//</span><br />And given that this is exactly what you did, it smacks of shouting in the reader&#039;s ear: &quot;Hey, you! Notice this! I did this thing!&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can tell she doesn’t want to be here as much as I do//</span><br />I don&#039;t think this says what you meant. You want something closer to: &quot;I can tell she finds her current predicament as distasteful as I do.&quot; What you said is that Pinkie likes being here, but Dash is less enthusiastic.<br /><br />I&#039;m noticing more and more comma splices in the narration. While you have some license insofar as it&#039;s essentially dialogue, it&#039;s starting to grate on me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her gaze fixated out the window//</span><br />You&#039;re confusing &quot;fixated&quot; with &quot;fixed.&quot; She could conceivably be fixated, but it implies a mental process, which her gaze couldn&#039;t have.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To emphasize this she sighs//</span><br />To emphasize what? Pinkie&#039;s perception of her? This really suggests that Dash does it intentionally because of smoething she&#039;d have no way of knowing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her name feels empty, however rapturous it might be, and I can’t help but feel sympathy for her.//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;feel&quot; here. This is a very dangerous word anyway. In a tight perspective like this, you can get away with more telling, but Pinkie seems to be operating on a more stimulus-response level. Rather than jumping to her conclusion, it might work better to show what physical sensations or evoked memories or imagery it brings out in her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I release a breath I didn’t know I’ve been holding.//</span><br />Yipe. Cliche ahoy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rattles the carriage//</span><br />This shaking and rattling of the carriage is starting to get repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her happiness does not diminish the slightest//</span><br />I think you&#039;re missing an &quot;in&quot; here, and I&#039;d really rather you show this part, as it&#039;s a pretty critical moment in their becoming friends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I follow the motion as best I could//</span><br />Inconsistent verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;clapping her hooves together to emphasize the point//</span><br />So she&#039;s emphasizing again? Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Arsenopyrite//</span><br />Okay, I don&#039;t get at all why this is the first thing that&#039;d pop into her mind. It wouldn&#039;t be any more unpleasant than any generic rock or dirt, really. It&#039;s not a mineral that forms particularly sharp corners or needle-like shapes, or that would be caustic. Maybe something like Whewellite, obsidian, carborundum. For that matter, plain old Halite would hurt like hell. A freshly broken piece of &quot;stinkspat&quot; Fluorite?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wonderbolt’s//</span><br />Given that she&#039;s pretty much intuited what this means some time ago, why are you still putting it in lower case?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I tap my hooves together and look at her shyly.</span><br />I&#039;m seeing more of this telly language now. It&#039;s not really obtrusive, but you might want to read over the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread and decide if you ought to be forging a deeper connection in places.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sky above bellows thunder angrily and is obscured by rainfall.//</span><br />And yet you said there was &quot;perpetual darkness.&quot; There&#039;s some inconsistency as to what they can actually see and not see, including each other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ever since I saw the sun flower//</span><br />Okay, I guess I&#039;m catching on that this is the Rainboom…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and myself now curious//</span><br />That phrasing just grates on me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trails off//</span><br />In most cases, it&#039;s bad form to tell me what I can already deduce from the punctuation. Exceptions are common things like &quot;ask&quot; and &quot;shout,&quot; but when you use an ellipsis to trail off or a dash for an interruption, you don&#039;t need to reiterate that as the speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smiles a brings up a hoof between us.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“See, you asked me a question…” She brings up her other hoof. “…and then I asked one!”//</span><br />The way to wedge a narrative aside into a quote is thus:<br />“See, you asked me a question—” she brings up her other hoof “—and then I asked one!”<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but my eyes are fixated//</span><br />Another odd use of that word…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I trace my hoof through its tangles, attentive with every motion.//</span><br />Watch out for misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the tangles are attentive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I see obsidian//</span><br />What shade of her tail is so dark as to appear this black?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sucumb</span><br />succumb<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s entire population is all pegasi like myself,”—she flexes her wing and it rubs into me—“and when I was a filly</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion. That comma needs to go. And note the difference with the example I gave you earlier. Here, the dashes are with the narration, while in my example, they were with the speech. Both are acceptable. The difference is that in my example, the speaker stops while the aside occurs. It seemed appropriate for that case, and I wonder if it isn&#039;t here as well. The form you have here tends to indicate that the speech never stopped.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her cheerful mood dampers//</span><br />Dampens, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fast enough to break the sound barrier//</span><br />Well, in canon occurrences, she&#039;s formed a shockwave well before she achieves the rainboom. By estimating it from conical shock tables, she&#039;s going about Mach 7 before the rainboom forms. Though I certainly don&#039;t expect the animators actually intended that level of detail…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even with the hazard billowing just outside the carriage//</span><br />Hazard? Okay, you&#039;ve gone to the thesaurus one too many times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She brings her debased eyes back up to mine.//</span><br />I don&#039;t at all get that word choice. The connotation is way off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looks perplexed//</span><br />Show me how this looks. As out-of-touch as Pinkie is with reading emotions in general, having her make the conclusions for me seems even more off-kilter, like her accuracy is tied to narrative convenience.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for awhile//</span><br />&quot;Awhile&quot; and &quot;a while&quot; are pretty interchangeable, but not in this case. The preposition &quot;for&quot; needs an object, so you have to make it two words so there&#039;s a noun there to serve that function. I see a few other instances. You might want to Ctrl-f for this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I forget what going on in this scene//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just…!//</span><br />I&#039;m not one to complain about question marks or exclamation marks after a dash or question marks after an ellipsis, but this combination has never made sense to me. She&#039;s trailing off… emphatically? They have pretty opposite functions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all of the sudden//</span><br />all of a sudden. You do this again later. Suddenness can be awkward to point out in narration, though. We had no reason to expect she&#039;d be cold, so just leaving this bit off would still generate that effect. In fact, with this lead-in, it feels like she senses it coming on, such that it actually takes away from the suddenness.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who’s else//</span><br />who else&#039;s<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my mom wasn’t really…” Her voice trails off//</span><br />You&#039;re doing that thing again…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sighs again//</span><br />There&#039;s an awful lot of sighing going on in this part of the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without thinking Rocky rolls out of my hooves and I reach for it as far as I can.//</span><br />I get that British convention often doesn&#039;t use commas for introductory elements, but I&#039;d suggest one here, or it sounds like &quot;Rocky&quot; is a direct object for &quot;thinking.&quot; However, &quot;without thinking&quot; is clearly supposed to modify Pinkie, but she never appears in that clause, only her hooves. So you&#039;re saying that Rocky isn&#039;t thinking. While I believe you, it isn&#039;t particularly illustrative.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There’re a few more droplets//</span><br />There was an earlier spot I let slide where you used &quot;there&#039;s&quot; with a plural. But if you&#039;re going to use this form here, be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a curtain being risen//</span><br />Raised. &quot;Rise&quot; doesn&#039;t take a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;weight I hadn’t known I’ve been carrying</span><br />Cliche reprised.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying in bed//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh that’s not a problem dear.//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br />First off, this was well written. It didn&#039;t feel as long as it actually is. But there are a few things I want to go over.<br /><br />There were only a few consistent mechanical things: commas between clauses, some mistaken phrasings, etc. Nothing much there, and certainly things you&#039;re capable of fixing. Just note that I only marked a couple of examples for each—you&#039;ll need to root them out.<br /><br />I talked some about Pinkie&#039;s colorblindness, but I&#039;ll touch on it a bit more here, since I&#039;ve seen how it all plays out now. So, she&#039;s never know color, then gets a bunch of it in a burst. It&#039;s not like she&#039;d understand it, though. She can see red for that moment, but she doesn&#039;t <i>know</i> it&#039;s red intrinsically. She&#039;d just know she saw some confusing things she&#039;d never seen before, and now they&#039;re gone. Put a little more thought into making this feel authentic.<br /><br />So, Pinkie is telling this story. And yet you use very dense, florid speech for her. I can&#039;t help but feel like this is a story told from the point of view of someone who&#039;s interesting, but not Pinkie. She only shares a name and a few details about her life with Pinkie. It&#039;s a good idea even in a third-person narration to keep your narrator close to word choice and intelligence level commensurate with your focus character, and that&#039;s even more imperative in first-person. This just doesn&#039;t sound like Pinkie. Not that Pinkie could never be this introspective and intelligent-sounding, but canon Pinkie is always your starting point. If you want her to be something different, you need to get me there first, or you might as well use an OC. Now there are times when such a disconnect can work, and I&#039;d be inclined to overlook it, were this in third person, but I can help coming back to this: The narrator is supposed to <i>be</i> Pinkie, but sounds nothing like her.<br /><br />I caught you being telly a few times where I felt it was inopportune, but there weren&#039;t too many instances. It&#039;s worth a scan over points where the emotion runs high to make sure you&#039;re engaging the reader enough.<br /><br />I didn&#039;t at all care for the words colored so they&#039;d be missing. Enhancing the story is one thing, but making it difficult to read is another. You don&#039;t want to slow the reader down at all. This is akin to giving very phonetic spellings for a thick accent. Yes, it creates an effect, but it&#039;s just irritating to read.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 61

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

On the chapter title:
At least it's not the story's title, but these inscrutable foreign language titles inspire little more than an eye roll with most readers. They won't bother looking it up, and so it ends up meaning nothing, and even comes across as pretentious.

>waited somewhat impatiently//

This is your first sentence. You want to set a vivid scene and immediately draw the reader in. Being telly isn't the way to accomplish that. Show me what they do and get me to deduce that they're impatient.

>Spike and Twilight both tapped their feet on the empty platform.//

And now you do show us a bit, but it's detached, sandwiched between two bits of action, and pretty short and uninformative for the mood you're trying to create. Just the tapping feet can mean several different things.

>gruff looking //

Hyphenate compound descriptors.

>She dug into one of the two saddlebags she was wearing with her snout.//

You might want to relocate that "with her snout" after "dug" or to the beginning of the sentences. As it is, it sounds like she was wearing her snout, which while true, isn't a useful piece of information.

>The train driver gave the pair a hard look.//

Wait, when did he join in? You had the conductor talking to them, but that's not the driver.

>princess’//

Though it's common to see this, as a singular term, the proper possessive is "princess's."

>Spike stuck out his chest a little at the pony being rude to his adoptive big sister and best friend. //

>Her heart swelled with appreciation when Spike took her offences as his own.//
Note the jumpy perspective. These are both internal attitudes, and so require the narrator to have switched perspectives over the course of two sentences. Perspective shifts can occur, but they need to be smooth and carefully considered. Is this information vital? Is it impossible to communicate both parts from the same perspective? Unless there's a compelling reason to change, it's better to stay with one character's point of view for extended stretches.

>The stallion huffed in annoyance.//

>Twilight was practically bubbling with eagerness//
More telling. You're lapsing into it quite a bit. Some can fly, but this is too much. Your story should be a little movie playing in my head. You provide the visuals, and I'll figure out the emotions. Have a look at the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread.

>Assuming my research and hypothesis is correct//

Number mismatch.

>resistant to it's effects//

Its/it's confusion.

>did the princess have any advise//

advice

> Maybe others theorized this before, but never found any significant evidence.//

A common problem. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You don't need one here, since you don't have a new clause, but you can get some leeway for the sake of flow.

>Time seemed to fly by. Before they knew it, the train came to a grinding halt.//

This is a very, very abrupt transition. You didn't ease into it at all. They're in the middle of talking, and then, hey, time skip.

>All right you two,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

>Alright//

Be consistent about which way you spell this.

>feeling more than a little bit irked by the driver's attitude//

More telling, and you're mixing up their jobs again. A conductor isn't who drives the train.

>Spike looked at the bulging saddle bags, a slight twinge of guilt made his claws twitch.//

Comma splice.

>Spike was suffering much more from his own boredom than the heat.//

and just three short sentences later…
>The patient pony made sure not to take that frustration out on her number one assistant and friend.//
More of these back-and-forth swings of perspective.

>The dragon’s ear fin twitched as he overheard that last part.//

You don't exactly overhear what's said directly to you…

>With that said//

Phrases like this that reference the writing itself are immersion-breaking.

>the unicorn levitated a red and white checkered blanket//

Getting a bit much LUS here. And this conversation has been a little talking heads, too. There are short discussions of both at the top os this thread.

>'Geographical Locations and their Histories'//

Book titles don't go in quotes. Thery're underlined or, preferably, italicized.

>She clutched her tummy harder. “I-I think I’m gonna-“

>The poor mare was unable to finish
You either have an unintentional line break or forgot to leave a blank one. And please use a proper dash for interruptions.

>Owe//

You sure you didn't mean "ow"?

>Don’t worry Spike.//

Another missing comma for direct address.

>She nudged his shoulder with her snout, starting to worry.//

Participles are common as misplaced modifiers. By proximity here, it sounds like her snout is starting to worry.

>wide eyed//

Again, hyphenate your compound descriptors.

At this point, I have to ask why there's a rail line maintained to a place nobody goes…

>She couldn’t tell her assistant the truth –//

You're inconsistent about using an actual dash or a double hyphen.

>Beyond the unnerving fear she felt, she still felt//

Close repetition of "felt." And telly. "Feel" is a dangerous verb, since it encourages telliness. It's best reserved for physical sensations.

>she certain that some extinct species must be responsible instead//

Missing word.

>Twilight took out her camera and took a few more pictures.//

Repetition of "took."

>“Look over there,” Spike said while pointing, “See the top of that building?”//

The way you've punctuated it, the two parts of the quote form a single, continuous sentence, which they can't. You must have realized that; you didn't capitalize it that way.

>Over a set of shorter structures that might once have been grocery stores//

Why would multiple grocery stores have been that close together? And what about them leads her to conclude that's what they might be?

>Strange, Twilight thought.//

Put thoughts in italics or quotes. I believe you used italics in an earlier instance.

>figures moving//

Extraneous space.

>Death before surrender!!!//

Watch the multiple punctuation. One exclamation mark is plenty.

>“Yes ma’am,” Spike saluted.//

That's not a speaking action.

>metal behemoths//

You used "behemoth" not that long ago. The more unusual a word, the more it sticks in the mind, then feels repetitive when you use it again too soon.

>Spike nodded; and before either knew it, they had drifted off to sleep.//

With all the thoughts that must be rushing through their heads, that was easy.

>The dragon looked to his sister//

I guess I can't fault you for this, but canon plays their relationship as closer to mother/son. Consider the complete lack of a reaction of Spike to Shining Armor, especially as compared to Twilight. He certainly doesn't seem invested in that family beyond her.

>light turning//

Another extraneous space. You might want to do a Ctrl-f for two spaces.

>Spike felt the strangest feeling of enchantment with her.//

I warned you about using "feel," plus this is repetitive.

>a much bigger lady standing next to her looking out a window. The little girl was playing with a doll as the older female looked out the window.//

So, she was looking out a window?

>burntout//

burnt-out

>His eye's overflowed//

Why the possessive?

>mucus leaking his nose//

Missing a "from."

>His tears moistening her fur, waking her slightly from her restless sleep.//

You haven't been using a narrator that speaks in fragments, so it feels out of place to do it suddenly here.

>“I don’t want to talk about it."//

This really implies that he fully understands the nature of what he saw. If he felt like the chance might not come again to interact with these scenes, wouldn't he want to take her to see? Or if he thought there was any chance of danger to Twilight, he'd warn her. I don't buy this reaction.

>researchers turned adventurers//

Though not a modifier, this is also a hyphenated term.

>Those of which were not inked out//

Lose the "of."

>that would likely appeal to a certain unicorn DJ//

This is hopelessly gratuitous. Canon has never suggested Twilight has any relationship with her whatsoever, and you're not offering any evidence to support such here, either.

>a smoking barrel//

From your earlier description of what were apparently tanks:
>they also had long tubes sticking out; all pointed away from the building//
So does she know what a barrel is or not? These are contradictory.

>but still substantially larger then a pony//

Then/than confusion.

>They recognized the body shape as that possessed by the beings in their separate visions.//

Yes, you already mentioned that it was "another one of the bipeds." I've seen you do a fair amount of this type of rehashing.

>Spikes voice//

Missing apostrophe.

> It had short cut hair, barely more then fuzz on it's head and around it's mouth, both were dark brown.//

It's/its AND than/then confusion. The fun has been doubled! And the second comma is a splice.

>It also possessed hair just above it's expressive grey eyes

It's/its. Really. Mistakes with this were pretty spotty early on, but four of them in two sentences?

>Gasses//

gases

>nebulas//

I think Twilight would use the more formal plural "nebulae."

>carrying members of the race from place to place//

The unintentional rhyme here is undercutting the serious mood.

>They could not hear her anymore than a weapon could hear the pleas of its victims to stop.//

The way you're using it here, "any more" needs to be two words.

>I don’t want to see anymore.//

Same thing again, unless you actually mean Twilight wants to lose her sight.

>“Wait! Don’t go!” The pony called.//

Capitalization error.

>hind quarters//

hindquarters

So, the mechanical things first. There were a lot of little ones. Things I had to point out multiple times? Watch those. Given how many editing passes I assume this has been through, I'm surprised how many typos are still in there, and things like inconsistent dash use and thought formatting.

Stylistically, there was some talking heads, which tends to make conversations feel bland, and until the end, there was a lack of emotional attachment to the characters. The narrative focused more on the progression of events at the expense of how the characters felt about it, and when you did touch on the emotions, more often than not it was to bluntly inform me of them.

The plot was actually interesting. It kept me reading to find out what this is, but there was a huge disconnect overshadowing it all for me. I touched on it tangentially once already. There's a train line running out here that nobody ever actually uses, and yet it makes the trip regularly. Celestia certainly seemed to know what Twilight might find. I got more of a feel of "Go there—you might learn something interesting" than "I have no idea what's there, so I need you to explore the area" from her. And if she had the slightest inkling at all, she's knowingly sending Twilight into horrible danger. It'd be hard to believe that Celestia truly didn't have any idea what was there, given the nearby train station.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />On the chapter title:<br />At least it&#039;s not the story&#039;s title, but these inscrutable foreign language titles inspire little more than an eye roll with most readers. They won&#039;t bother looking it up, and so it ends up meaning nothing, and even comes across as pretentious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waited somewhat impatiently//</span><br />This is your first sentence. You want to set a vivid scene and immediately draw the reader in. Being telly isn&#039;t the way to accomplish that. Show me what they do and get me to deduce that they&#039;re impatient.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike and Twilight both tapped their feet on the empty platform.//</span><br />And now you do show us a bit, but it&#039;s detached, sandwiched between two bits of action, and pretty short and uninformative for the mood you&#039;re trying to create. Just the tapping feet can mean several different things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gruff looking //</span><br />Hyphenate compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She dug into one of the two saddlebags she was wearing with her snout.//</span><br />You might want to relocate that &quot;with her snout&quot; after &quot;dug&quot; or to the beginning of the sentences. As it is, it sounds like she was wearing her snout, which while true, isn&#039;t a useful piece of information.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The train driver gave the pair a hard look.//</span><br />Wait, when did he join in? You had the conductor talking to them, but that&#039;s not the driver.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princess’//</span><br />Though it&#039;s common to see this, as a singular term, the proper possessive is &quot;princess&#039;s.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike stuck out his chest a little at the pony being rude to his adoptive big sister and best friend. //</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her heart swelled with appreciation when Spike took her offences as his own.//</span><br />Note the jumpy perspective. These are both internal attitudes, and so require the narrator to have switched perspectives over the course of two sentences. Perspective shifts can occur, but they need to be smooth and carefully considered. Is this information vital? Is it impossible to communicate both parts from the same perspective? Unless there&#039;s a compelling reason to change, it&#039;s better to stay with one character&#039;s point of view for extended stretches.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stallion huffed in annoyance.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was practically bubbling with eagerness//</span><br />More telling. You&#039;re lapsing into it quite a bit. Some can fly, but this is too much. Your story should be a little movie playing in my head. You provide the visuals, and I&#039;ll figure out the emotions. Have a look at the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Assuming my research and hypothesis is correct//</span><br />Number mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;resistant to it&#039;s effects//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;did the princess have any advise//</span><br />advice<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; Maybe others theorized this before, but never found any significant evidence.//</span><br />A common problem. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You don&#039;t need one here, since you don&#039;t have a new clause, but you can get some leeway for the sake of flow.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Time seemed to fly by. Before they knew it, the train came to a grinding halt.//</span><br />This is a very, very abrupt transition. You didn&#039;t ease into it at all. They&#039;re in the middle of talking, and then, hey, time skip.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All right you two,//</span><br />In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Alright//</span><br />Be consistent about which way you spell this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;feeling more than a little bit irked by the driver&#039;s attitude//</span><br />More telling, and you&#039;re mixing up their jobs again. A conductor isn&#039;t who drives the train.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike looked at the bulging saddle bags, a slight twinge of guilt made his claws twitch.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike was suffering much more from his own boredom than the heat.//</span><br />and just three short sentences later…<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The patient pony made sure not to take that frustration out on her number one assistant and friend.//</span><br />More of these back-and-forth swings of perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The dragon’s ear fin twitched as he overheard that last part.//</span><br />You don&#039;t exactly overhear what&#039;s said directly to you…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that said//</span><br />Phrases like this that reference the writing itself are immersion-breaking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the unicorn levitated a red and white checkered blanket//</span><br />Getting a bit much LUS here. And this conversation has been a little talking heads, too. There are short discussions of both at the top os this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;Geographical Locations and their Histories&#039;//</span><br />Book titles don&#039;t go in quotes. Thery&#039;re underlined or, preferably, italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She clutched her tummy harder. “I-I think I’m gonna-“</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The poor mare was unable to finish</span><br />You either have an unintentional line break or forgot to leave a blank one. And please use a proper dash for interruptions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Owe//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;ow&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t worry Spike.//</span><br />Another missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She nudged his shoulder with her snout, starting to worry.//</span><br />Participles are common as misplaced modifiers. By proximity here, it sounds like her snout is starting to worry.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wide eyed//</span><br />Again, hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br />At this point, I have to ask why there&#039;s a rail line maintained to a place nobody goes…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She couldn’t tell her assistant the truth –//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent about using an actual dash or a double hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Beyond the unnerving fear she felt, she still felt//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;felt.&quot; And telly. &quot;Feel&quot; is a dangerous verb, since it encourages telliness. It&#039;s best reserved for physical sensations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she certain that some extinct species must be responsible instead//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight took out her camera and took a few more pictures.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;took.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Look over there,” Spike said while pointing, “See the top of that building?”//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve punctuated it, the two parts of the quote form a single, continuous sentence, which they can&#039;t. You must have realized that; you didn&#039;t capitalize it that way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Over a set of shorter structures that might once have been grocery stores//</span><br />Why would multiple grocery stores have been that close together? And what about them leads her to conclude that&#039;s what they might be?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Strange, Twilight thought.//</span><br />Put thoughts in italics or quotes. I believe you used italics in an earlier instance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;figures moving//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Death before surrender!!!</i>//</span><br />Watch the multiple punctuation. One exclamation mark is plenty.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yes ma’am,” Spike saluted.//</span><br />That&#039;s not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;metal behemoths//</span><br />You used &quot;behemoth&quot; not that long ago. The more unusual a word, the more it sticks in the mind, then feels repetitive when you use it again too soon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike nodded; and before either knew it, they had drifted off to sleep.//</span><br />With all the thoughts that must be rushing through their heads, that was easy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The dragon looked to his sister//</span><br />I guess I can&#039;t fault you for this, but canon plays their relationship as closer to mother/son. Consider the complete lack of a reaction of Spike to Shining Armor, especially as compared to Twilight. He certainly doesn&#039;t seem invested in that family beyond her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;light turning//</span><br />Another extraneous space. You might want to do a Ctrl-f for two spaces.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike felt the strangest feeling of enchantment with her.//</span><br />I warned you about using &quot;feel,&quot; plus this is repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a much bigger lady standing next to her looking out a window. The little girl was playing with a doll as the older female looked out the window.//</span><br />So, she was looking out a window?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;burntout//</span><br />burnt-out<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His eye&#039;s overflowed//</span><br />Why the possessive?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mucus leaking his nose//</span><br />Missing a &quot;from.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His tears moistening her fur, waking her slightly from her restless sleep.//</span><br />You haven&#039;t been using a narrator that speaks in fragments, so it feels out of place to do it suddenly here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I don’t want to talk about it.&quot;//</span><br />This really implies that he fully understands the nature of what he saw. If he felt like the chance might not come again to interact with these scenes, wouldn&#039;t he want to take her to see? Or if he thought there was any chance of danger to Twilight, he&#039;d warn her. I don&#039;t buy this reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;researchers turned adventurers//</span><br />Though not a modifier, this is also a hyphenated term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Those of which were not inked out//</span><br />Lose the &quot;of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that would likely appeal to a certain unicorn DJ//</span><br />This is hopelessly gratuitous. Canon has never suggested Twilight has any relationship with her whatsoever, and you&#039;re not offering any evidence to support such here, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a smoking barrel//</span><br />From your earlier description of what were apparently tanks:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they also had long tubes sticking out; all pointed away from the building//</span><br />So does she know what a barrel is or not? These are contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but still substantially larger then a pony//</span><br />Then/than confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They recognized the body shape as that possessed by the beings in their separate visions.//</span><br />Yes, you already mentioned that it was &quot;another one of the bipeds.&quot; I&#039;ve seen you do a fair amount of this type of rehashing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spikes voice//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; It had short cut hair, barely more then fuzz on it&#039;s head and around it&#039;s mouth, both were dark brown.//</span><br />It&#039;s/its AND than/then confusion. The fun has been doubled! And the second comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It also possessed hair just above it&#039;s expressive grey eyes</span><br />It&#039;s/its. Really. Mistakes with this were pretty spotty early on, but four of them in two sentences?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gasses//</span><br />gases<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nebulas//</span><br />I think Twilight would use the more formal plural &quot;nebulae.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;carrying members of the race from place to place//</span><br />The unintentional rhyme here is undercutting the serious mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They could not hear her anymore than a weapon could hear the pleas of its victims to stop.//</span><br />The way you&#039;re using it here, &quot;any more&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t want to see anymore.//</span><br />Same thing again, unless you actually mean Twilight wants to lose her sight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Wait! Don’t go!” The pony called.//</span><br />Capitalization error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hind quarters//</span><br />hindquarters<br /><br />So, the mechanical things first. There were a lot of little ones. Things I had to point out multiple times? Watch those. Given how many editing passes I assume this has been through, I&#039;m surprised how many typos are still in there, and things like inconsistent dash use and thought formatting.<br /><br />Stylistically, there was some talking heads, which tends to make conversations feel bland, and until the end, there was a lack of emotional attachment to the characters. The narrative focused more on the progression of events at the expense of how the characters felt about it, and when you did touch on the emotions, more often than not it was to bluntly inform me of them.<br /><br />The plot was actually interesting. It kept me reading to find out what this is, but there was a huge disconnect overshadowing it all for me. I touched on it tangentially once already. There&#039;s a train line running out here that nobody ever actually uses, and yet it makes the trip regularly. Celestia certainly seemed to know what Twilight might find. I got more of a feel of &quot;Go there—you might learn something interesting&quot; than &quot;I have no idea what&#039;s there, so I need you to explore the area&quot; from her. And if she had the slightest inkling at all, she&#039;s knowingly sending Twilight into horrible danger. It&#039;d be hard to believe that Celestia truly didn&#039;t have any idea what was there, given the nearby train station.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 62

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“But muuuuuum!” whined Chrysalis, “all the ponies get to take part in Nightmare Night!”//

The way you've punctuated this, both parts of the quote should form a single, continuous sentence. So let's remove the narration and see how it looks:
“But muuuuuum! all the ponies get to take part in Nightmare Night!”
Doesn't work, does it?

>Screeching to a halt as she came to the door, she burst into the study startling her father.//

Note that participles and "as" clauses imply simultaneous action, so all of this happens at the same time. She screeches to a halt, gets to the door, and bursts through it simultaneously, when in fact there would be a sequence to it.

>trick or treating//

That's a hyphenated term.

>She nodded her head and grinned, “Uhuh, in New Hoofshire!”//

You have no speaking verb in your attribution. You can't nod or grin a sentence.

>Chrysalis’//

Though it's common to see this, for a singular word, the proper possessive would be "Chrysalis's."

>But dad//

When used as a term of address, capitalize "Dad."

>hi sweetie//

Missing comma for direct address.

>muuuuum!//

When a question mark or exclamation mark is attached to an italicized word, you will commonly italicize it as well.

>Don’t talk about Commander Obsidian like that youngling, he’s a respectable changeling who will take care of you.//

Another missing comma for direct address, and the one you have is a splice.

This conversation was pretty talking heads. There's a discussion of that at the top of this thread.

>-Meanwhile, in a different part of the hive-//

This is a very blunt instrument. Surely, the reader can figure this out on his own.

>This was short-lived//

Demonstratives (this, that, these, those) make poor pronouns, since they often have vague and overly broad antecedents that refer to the writing itself.

>captain//

Same as "Dad." As a term of address, it would be capitalized.

>The door opened revealing a changeling//

You should set off most participles with commas.

>Obsidian scowled at the captain who quickly cut himself off//

Without a comma before "who," it implies there is more than one captain present, and you're specifying which one.

>Obsidian however,//

"However" needs commas on both sides.

>Satisfied with her work, she cackled to herself//

This is the fourth sentence in a row with a participle. Your sentence structure is getting repetitive.

>“I see. That should be fun for the two of you,” the captain smiled.//

Another poor choice of speaking verb. How do you smile a sentence?

>Obsidian also noticed she’d managed to cut a pair of holes for her wings which was quite impressive.//

What exactly would be so much more impressive about the wing holes over the eye and horn ones?

>Your, majesty//

Why in the world is that comma there? And the entire honorific would be capitalized.

>he’s like a…” Metamorphosis twirled his hoof in the air, “…grumpy grandfather to her.//

Here's how you do a narrative aside breaking a quote:
he’s like a—” Metamorphosis twirled his hoof in the air “—grumpy grandfather to her.

>W-who//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Wh-who

>the colt who was dress as the vampire//

Verb form error.

>You can call me, Lucky Feather//

Why is that comma there?

>Chrysalis breath//

Missing possessive.

>lets go get some sweets!//

Let's

>He couldn’t risk calling out for her lest he blow both of their covers, he tried to keep his calm and remember his training as a guard but none of that seemed relevant to him at the time.//

The one comma you have is a splice, and you're missing two others that should be there.

>I was like that at my age to//

To/too confusion.

>They thanked the mare and quickly scampered over to his mother, giggling in glee.//

Participles are commonly misplaced modifiers. By proximity, you're saying that the mother giggled, but I'm betting you meant the group of children.

>‘cos//

Smart quotes break when you try to make a leading apostrophe. It's backward.

Hm. Not much happens here. We don't learn anything interesting about any of the characters, the plot is formulaic and predictable, and none of the jokes were laugh-out-loud funny. It's lightly heartwarming, I guess, but we're looking for things that stand out in some way, and this really doesn't.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“But <i>muuuuuum!</i>” whined Chrysalis, “all the ponies get to take part in Nightmare Night!”//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve punctuated this, both parts of the quote should form a single, continuous sentence. So let&#039;s remove the narration and see how it looks:<br />“But <i>muuuuuum!</i> all the ponies get to take part in Nightmare Night!”<br />Doesn&#039;t work, does it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Screeching to a halt as she came to the door, she burst into the study startling her father.//</span><br />Note that participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses imply simultaneous action, so all of this happens at the same time. She screeches to a halt, gets to the door, and bursts through it simultaneously, when in fact there would be a sequence to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trick or treating//</span><br />That&#039;s a hyphenated term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She nodded her head and grinned, “Uhuh, in New Hoofshire!”//</span><br />You have no speaking verb in your attribution. You can&#039;t nod or grin a sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chrysalis’//</span><br />Though it&#039;s common to see this, for a singular word, the proper possessive would be &quot;Chrysalis&#039;s.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But dad//</span><br />When used as a term of address, capitalize &quot;Dad.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hi sweetie//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>muuuuum</i>!//</span><br />When a question mark or exclamation mark is attached to an italicized word, you will commonly italicize it as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t talk about Commander Obsidian like that youngling, he’s a respectable changeling who will take care of you.//</span><br />Another missing comma for direct address, and the one you have is a splice.<br /><br />This conversation was pretty talking heads. There&#039;s a discussion of that at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b>-Meanwhile, in a different part of the hive-</b>//</span><br />This is a very blunt instrument. Surely, the reader can figure this out on his own.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This was short-lived//</span><br />Demonstratives (this, that, these, those) make poor pronouns, since they often have vague and overly broad antecedents that refer to the writing itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;captain//</span><br />Same as &quot;Dad.&quot; As a term of address, it would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The door opened revealing a changeling//</span><br />You should set off most participles with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Obsidian scowled at the captain who quickly cut himself off//</span><br />Without a comma before &quot;who,&quot; it implies there is more than one captain present, and you&#039;re specifying which one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Obsidian however,//</span><br />&quot;However&quot; needs commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Satisfied with her work, she cackled to herself//</span><br />This is the fourth sentence in a row with a participle. Your sentence structure is getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I see. That should be fun for the two of you,” the captain smiled.//</span><br />Another poor choice of speaking verb. How do you smile a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Obsidian also noticed she’d managed to cut a pair of holes for her wings which was quite impressive.//</span><br />What exactly would be so much more impressive about the wing holes over the eye and horn ones?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your, majesty//</span><br />Why in the world is that comma there? And the entire honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he’s like a…” Metamorphosis twirled his hoof in the air, “…grumpy grandfather to her.//</span><br />Here&#039;s how you do a narrative aside breaking a quote:<br />he’s like a—” Metamorphosis twirled his hoof in the air “—grumpy grandfather to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;W-who//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Wh-who<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the colt who was dress as the vampire//</span><br />Verb form error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You can call me, Lucky Feather//</span><br />Why is that comma there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chrysalis breath//</span><br />Missing possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lets go get some sweets!//</span><br />Let&#039;s<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He couldn’t risk calling out for her lest he blow both of their covers, he tried to keep his calm and remember his training as a guard but none of that seemed relevant to him at the time.//</span><br />The one comma you have is a splice, and you&#039;re missing two others that should be there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was like that at my age to//</span><br />To/too confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They thanked the mare and quickly scampered over to his mother, giggling in glee.//</span><br />Participles are commonly misplaced modifiers. By proximity, you&#039;re saying that the mother giggled, but I&#039;m betting you meant the group of children.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cos//</span><br />Smart quotes break when you try to make a leading apostrophe. It&#039;s backward.<br /><br />Hm. Not much happens here. We don&#039;t learn anything interesting about any of the characters, the plot is formulaic and predictable, and none of the jokes were laugh-out-loud funny. It&#039;s lightly heartwarming, I guess, but we&#039;re looking for things that stand out in some way, and this really doesn&#039;t.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 63

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>going to//

Extraneous space.

>that she was sure that now that I was a princess//

This is a pretty ungainly phrasing. You have three nested "that" noun clauses.

>When you're a princess, it's so easy to forget your roots.//

Fine point, but it's easy to slip into addressing the reader like this. It can take some thought to rephrase and avoid doing so, but it's a bad idea to address the reader, unless you've established a framing device in which the narrator will regularly interact with the reader, or you have a second-person point of view, where the reader is actually a character in the story.

>I want to remember my little ponies.//

Besides sounding trite, this doesn't quite mesh with her previous statement. Calling them "her" ponies isn't exactly grounded, and is a notable difference from how she thinks of them in canon.

>(politely of course)//

Actual parentheses work better in articles of writing, as in a letter or journal entry. As narration, you could just use dashes or commas here, but if you're married to the parentheses, it's not out of the question.

>Inasmuch unless she was too busy//

The "inasmuch" doesn't parse here.

>I also told her not to call me Shirley.//

This is a very old and very tired joke.

>Where was I?//

Okay, so you do establish the reader as someone listening to Twilight tell this story. That introduces another issue. It's implied in any first-person story that the narrator is telling it to someone, though you can generally get away without establishing who and why. But that can't really be swept under the rug when you involve the reader like this. Why does she want to tell me the story? And why am I listening to her?

>Febreze//

Using real-life brand names is problematic at best. You could just generically say "air freshener" without losing any meaning.

>every time she visits, her allergies act up and she has sneezing fits for a week//

Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>sing song//

Hyphenate. The way you've phrased this, it makes it sound like Fluttershy always talks in a sing-song voice, which isn't the case. Maybe "a" instead of "her" would work better.

>I really miss my friends sometimes.//

This is a pretty throwaway line. You don't really do anything to justify it or make it mean anything. Just the brief reminiscence about Shy and Dash brought this on? Then say so. And how does it make her feel? Don't tell me bluntly, but give me a couple of symptoms. Maybe she stares off for a moment, maybe she gets a warm feeling.

>Oh, hi Twilight!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>where I was sitting sipping tea on her couch//

You at least had Shy bringing her tea, but the last time you told me where Twi was, she'd just come through the door. When did she get to the couch?

>and droppings of animals poop//

First, you're missing an apostrophe, but this is also redundant. "Droppings of poop" is like saying "pee of urine."

>Sparkle do best: Organize!//

You don't need to capitalize after a colon when it doesn't refer to multiple sentences.

>a broom, if that's

>ok with you."//
Why is this line break here?

>Huh, what is that smell?, I thought.

Any end punctuation takes the place of a comma in transitioning out of speech.

>*POMPH!* went my wings.//

Made-up words for sounds effects are a bad idea, and so is putting asterisks around them. Just describe the sound.

>I'm sorry overreacted like that.//

Missing word.

>ok//

Write this out as "okay."

>She cut me off.//

This was already evident from the way you punctuated the dialogue. You don't need to indicate it again.

>Celestia's hot sun.//

This is one of the most cliched things you could have possibly said. It's bad enough in narration, but as dialogue? When have they ever said this in canon?

>when they do eat, the can up to a third of their weight in food//

Typo and another missing word.

>a newborn bunny I had to put down because of severe birth defects//

This has really disturbing implications. She wouldn't bury it? How do the bunny's parents feel about it?

>And you're third question?//

Your/you're confusion.

>Ow!–…eye.//

Don't combine a dash and an ellipsis like this. They mean very different things.

>The next thirty seconds went way to fast.//

To/too confusion again.

>I actually literally heard a “squee” sound, like she was a cartoon character or something.//

Meta for the sake of meta is… a thing, I guess. Not a good thing.

>You licked her?!//

Given that reptiles are transmitters of salmonella, I'm with Twilight here.

>"She… she has… hepatic cancer."//

Letting the text itself do the work for you is cheating. Kind of.

>Hepatic is Gricean for… liver right?//

I have a hard time believing that Twilight would have to work this hard to figure that out.

>She doesn't speak Equestrian very well.//

Very well? You stated explicitly earlier that she couldn't understand anything Twilight said.

>"I mean just that: I don't know why I can talk to animals, or why I understand what they say. I just do. I guess I'm blessed with a gift."//

You've just gone through eleven paragraphs with only two actions breaking up all the dialogue, one of them a blatant tell. Check out the section on talking heads at the top of this thread.

>I shuttered watching the thing//

Shuddered.

>She also was several years older than the rest of us, come to think of it.//

Well, she's only one year older than Pinkie, as per canon.

>two hundred and sixty six//

Surely, someone as scientific as Twilight would know how to say a number properly. There's never an "and," and it's "sixty-six."

>example,//

Because you're ending this part of the quote with a dash to work in the aside, you don't need the comma.

>A few days latter//

later

>watch her bury her animals//

Okay, let's bring up that baby rabbit again. Why not feed Gabriella to another one of her patients?

>writing about this//

So she's writing this story as opposed to telling it to someone? Because the odd vocal quirks she used earlier in the story absolutely do not belong in something written. They're conversational.

I get that Twilight learns a lesson, but we don't get to see her, y'know, learn it. She breaks down, Fluttershy explains things to her, and then we see her afterward, once she's internalized it. We never get to see the moment when she gets it, and that's where the real power is.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;going to//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that she was sure that now that I was a princess//</span><br />This is a pretty ungainly phrasing. You have three nested &quot;that&quot; noun clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When you&#039;re a princess, it&#039;s so easy to forget your roots.//</span><br />Fine point, but it&#039;s easy to slip into addressing the reader like this. It can take some thought to rephrase and avoid doing so, but it&#039;s a bad idea to address the reader, unless you&#039;ve established a framing device in which the narrator will regularly interact with the reader, or you have a second-person point of view, where the reader is actually a character in the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I want to remember my little ponies.//</span><br />Besides sounding trite, this doesn&#039;t quite mesh with her previous statement. Calling them &quot;her&quot; ponies isn&#039;t exactly grounded, and is a notable difference from how she thinks of them in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(politely of course)//</span><br />Actual parentheses work better in articles of writing, as in a letter or journal entry. As narration, you could just use dashes or commas here, but if you&#039;re married to the parentheses, it&#039;s not out of the question.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Inasmuch unless she was too busy//</span><br />The &quot;inasmuch&quot; doesn&#039;t parse here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I also told her not to call me Shirley.//</span><br />This is a very old and very tired joke.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Where was I?//</span><br />Okay, so you <i>do</i> establish the reader as someone listening to Twilight tell this story. That introduces another issue. It&#039;s implied in any first-person story that the narrator is telling it to someone, though you can generally get away without establishing who and why. But that can&#039;t really be swept under the rug when you involve the reader like this. Why does she want to tell me the story? And why am I listening to her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Febreze//</span><br />Using real-life brand names is problematic at best. You could just generically say &quot;air freshener&quot; without losing any meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;every time she visits, her allergies act up and she has sneezing fits for a week//</span><br />Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sing song//</span><br />Hyphenate. The way you&#039;ve phrased this, it makes it sound like Fluttershy always talks in a sing-song voice, which isn&#039;t the case. Maybe &quot;a&quot; instead of &quot;her&quot; would work better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I really miss my friends sometimes.//</span><br />This is a pretty throwaway line. You don&#039;t really do anything to justify it or make it mean anything. Just the brief reminiscence about Shy and Dash brought this on? Then say so. And how does it make her feel? Don&#039;t tell me bluntly, but give me a couple of symptoms. Maybe she stares off for a moment, maybe she gets a warm feeling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, hi Twilight!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;where I was sitting sipping tea on her couch//</span><br />You at least had Shy bringing her tea, but the last time you told me where Twi was, she&#039;d just come through the door. When did she get to the couch?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and droppings of animals poop//</span><br />First, you&#039;re missing an apostrophe, but this is also redundant. &quot;Droppings of poop&quot; is like saying &quot;pee of urine.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sparkle do best: Organize!//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to capitalize after a colon when it doesn&#039;t refer to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a broom, if that&#039;s</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ok with you.&quot;//</span><br />Why is this line break here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Huh, what is that smell?</i>, I thought.</span><br />Any end punctuation takes the place of a comma in transitioning out of speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;*POMPH!* went my wings.//</span><br />Made-up words for sounds effects are a bad idea, and so is putting asterisks around them. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m sorry overreacted like that.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ok//</span><br />Write this out as &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She cut me off.//</span><br />This was already evident from the way you punctuated the dialogue. You don&#039;t need to indicate it again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia&#039;s hot sun.//</span><br />This is one of the most cliched things you could have possibly said. It&#039;s bad enough in narration, but as dialogue? When have they ever said this in canon?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when they do eat, the can up to a third of their weight in food//</span><br />Typo and another missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a newborn bunny I had to put down because of severe birth defects//</span><br />This has really disturbing implications. She wouldn&#039;t bury it? How do the bunny&#039;s parents feel about it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And you&#039;re third question?//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ow!–…eye.//</span><br />Don&#039;t combine a dash and an ellipsis like this. They mean very different things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The next thirty seconds went way to fast.//</span><br />To/too confusion again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I actually literally heard a “squee” sound, like she was a cartoon character or something.//</span><br />Meta for the sake of meta is… a thing, I guess. Not a good thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You licked her?!//</span><br />Given that reptiles are transmitters of salmonella, I&#039;m with Twilight here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;She… she has… hepatic cancer.&quot;//</span><br />Letting the text itself do the work for you is cheating. Kind of.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hepatic is Gricean for… liver right?//</span><br />I have a hard time believing that Twilight would have to work this hard to figure that out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She doesn&#039;t speak Equestrian very well.//</span><br />Very well? You stated explicitly earlier that she couldn&#039;t understand anything Twilight said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I mean just that: I don&#039;t know why I can talk to animals, or why I understand what they say. I just do. I guess I&#039;m blessed with a gift.&quot;//</span><br />You&#039;ve just gone through eleven paragraphs with only two actions breaking up all the dialogue, one of them a blatant tell. Check out the section on talking heads at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I shuttered watching the thing//</span><br />Shuddered.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She also was several years older than the rest of us, come to think of it.//</span><br />Well, she&#039;s only one year older than Pinkie, as per canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two hundred and sixty six//</span><br />Surely, someone as scientific as Twilight would know how to say a number properly. There&#039;s never an &quot;and,&quot; and it&#039;s &quot;sixty-six.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;example,//</span><br />Because you&#039;re ending this part of the quote with a dash to work in the aside, you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A few days latter//</span><br />later<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;watch her bury her animals//</span><br />Okay, let&#039;s bring up that baby rabbit again. Why not feed Gabriella to another one of her patients?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;writing about this//</span><br />So she&#039;s writing this story as opposed to telling it to someone? Because the odd vocal quirks she used earlier in the story absolutely do not belong in something written. They&#039;re conversational.<br /><br />I get that Twilight learns a lesson, but we don&#039;t get to see her, y&#039;know, learn it. She breaks down, Fluttershy explains things to her, and then we see her afterward, once she&#039;s internalized it. We never get to see the moment when she gets it, and that&#039;s where the real power is.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 64

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the various cities municipal guards//

cities'

>Someday, she will return.//

I don't see a good reason for coloring this text. In fact, it appears so pale, that I almost didn't see it/ I thought you just had an extra line break to mark a weak scene break.

>deep blue manes. Deeply//

Watch the repetition, even if the words are used in different senses.

>Moon doth//

>star goes out and the sun gutters//
Why the inconsistency in using archaic language?

>She would rejoice at their loyalty, and reward them for their service.//

See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. Bottom line: you don't need one here, since it's all a single clause.

>the Sun Princess’ tasks//

While it's common to see this, singular terms do technically take the full apostrophe-s. The proper possessive would be "Princess's."

>respect for their monarch, whom they had served with unbreakable respect//

Watch the repetition again.

>Forty two//

Forty-two

First, the good news. This is well-written and almost free of mechanical problems, which is pretty rare. The backstory behind the batponies' creation is an interesting take on things.

Now the bad news. There isn't much story here. There is a ton of history, but it's all presented in a detached way. We don't get to see any of it unfold. The power of a story is in connecting to the characters who live it, but we don't see anyone live anything. The first third of the story is a narrative info-dump. The second third is Luna's info-dump monologue. The last third is Celestia's info-dump monologue. We're being told about all of this after the fact and see nothing but lip service as to how any of them felt about any of it. Even the little bit of conflict presented (whether the Nocturne will accept Luna's explanation and forgive her) is glossed over. They react in a way that shows they still revere her, but it's all action, no emotion. The same from Luna, who walks among them, but never reacts or lets on how any of it makes her feel. It's a lovely piece of world-building and a nice basis to use for a story, but what's here reads like a biography or a history textbook, not a story with a message.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the various cities municipal guards//</span><br />cities&#039;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Someday, she will return.//</span><br />I don&#039;t see a good reason for coloring this text. In fact, it appears so pale, that I almost didn&#039;t see it/ I thought you just had an extra line break to mark a weak scene break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;deep blue manes. Deeply//</span><br />Watch the repetition, even if the words are used in different senses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Moon doth</i>//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>star goes out and the sun gutters</i>//</span><br />Why the inconsistency in using archaic language?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She would rejoice at their loyalty, and reward them for their service.//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. Bottom line: you don&#039;t need one here, since it&#039;s all a single clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Sun Princess’ tasks//</span><br />While it&#039;s common to see this, singular terms do technically take the full apostrophe-s. The proper possessive would be &quot;Princess&#039;s.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;respect for their monarch, whom they had served with unbreakable respect//</span><br />Watch the repetition again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Forty two//</span><br />Forty-two<br /><br />First, the good news. This is well-written and almost free of mechanical problems, which is pretty rare. The backstory behind the batponies&#039; creation is an interesting take on things.<br /><br />Now the bad news. There isn&#039;t much story here. There is a ton of history, but it&#039;s all presented in a detached way. We don&#039;t get to see any of it unfold. The power of a story is in connecting to the characters who live it, but we don&#039;t see anyone live anything. The first third of the story is a narrative info-dump. The second third is Luna&#039;s info-dump monologue. The last third is Celestia&#039;s info-dump monologue. We&#039;re being told about all of this after the fact and see nothing but lip service as to how any of them felt about any of it. Even the little bit of conflict presented (whether the Nocturne will accept Luna&#039;s explanation and forgive her) is glossed over. They react in a way that shows they still revere her, but it&#039;s all action, no emotion. The same from Luna, who walks among them, but never reacts or lets on how any of it makes her feel. It&#039;s a lovely piece of world-building and a nice basis to use for a story, but what&#039;s here reads like a biography or a history textbook, not a story with a message.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 65

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>another torrent of tears //

When was the first?

>Wordlessly the two adults left the room.

>
>"That should keep her asleep for a while," the doctor reported.//
This is an odd juxtaposition. They leave wordlessly, then there are immediately words. Give me a transition. Where did they go? How much time passed?

>Her voice trailed off desperately.//

The ellipsis already shows her trailing off. You don't need to repeat it in the narration.

>Doctor Clearwater had trained for years to be a doctor//

I bet you can rephrase that to avoid repeating "doctor."

>The sight of her alone brought another torrent of tears streaming down her eyes//

This is clearly from the mother's perspective, and it's only the story's second paragraph. In the third, it's unclear that there is a perspective. Then in the fifth, we get this:
>he felt bitter that this mare would even make him say it//
Don't jerk the reader around with frequent changes of perspective like this. The longer you stay in one perspective, the more the reader identifies with that character and cares about him/her. Have a look at the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>There are worse odds than a coin toss.//

I hardly think his prognosis would be this dire for something he could only approximate as less than 50/50. Those are actually not bad odds for many serious conditions.

>Even without looking//

Participles are normally set off with commas.

>Don't make me say it, you bitch, he thought//

Wow. This is coming out of nowhere. What motivation would he have to be this mad at her? If he's studied to be a doctor as much as you imply, this is also something they're trained to handle. He'd tell the truth, cushion it as much as he felt was warranted, and stand by the facts. If there's some history here that's influencing him, you need to go into it to get me there. And the "he thought" part isn't actually his thought. It wouldn't be italicized.

>SOME//

Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis, except in the case of the Royal Canterlot Voice.

>Her mane, nearly as ragged as her daughter's, fell messily around her face in a way that was oddly alluring. Even her misery was tragically beautiful.//

And after silently cussing her out, he's now attracted to her in her moment of pain? I am now officially creeped out by this character.

>she began to sob//

Why "began"? You already had her sobbing in the first paragraph.

>If only she had recognized the early signs, if only the doctor had diagnosed Windflower quicker//

And now you've switched perspectives within a single paragraph.

>Outside the night had fallen unnoticed and a cold October breeze whistled through the trees.//

See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Maybe she will have a bit of peace//

If this is a thought, as indicated, italicize it.

>there came a point in which//

Usually phrased "at which."

>tear swollen//

Hyphenate compound descriptors.

>You are right, Princess. I do not know where I am going, but I have to keep going. It's time for me to stop being afraid.//

That was a rather quick change of heart. Really, it signifies that the central conflict of this chapter was no big deal. There was no struggle to achieve the goal, much like going grocery shopping.

>equestrian//

Capitalization, unless you literally mean "one who rides on horseback."

>As she fell into the dream//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>Casting the Princess one more brisk glance//

You're inconsistent in capitalizing "princess."

>movable press//

You should probably go with "printing press" or "movable type."

>such joy!//

When ! or ? is attached to an italicized word, it's normally italicized as well.

>made, this//

Extraneous space.

>your royal highness//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>We would love to see thy progress.//

You're being inconsistent with her archaic speech. Here, from chapter 1:
>"Child, why do you weep so?"//
This would be: "Child, why dost thou weep so?"

>corner stone//

cornerstone

>(Somewhat un-princess like)//

First, this wouldn't be capitalized. Second, actual parentheses work best in articles of writing, like a journal entry, or possibly in a first-person or very subjective third-person narration. But in an objective narration, it feels out of place, and in any narration, you could just as easily use dashes or possibly commas.

>No longer did desks and ink and parchment fill the room, instead it was dominated by a series of heavy presses//

Comma splice.

>a moments confusion//

Missing apostrophe.

>"Good morning, your highness," bowed a thickly built red stalltion//

Your attribution has no speaking verb.

>!!!!Grandpappy Flam's Miracle Elixer!!!

Is there a reason for the asymmetric number of exclamation marks and their boldness? And is the misspelling intentional?

>A common street remedy for every pain you can think of//

I know it can be tricky to avoid some phrasings that address the reader, but you really should. It feels out of place to suddenly do this when you haven't established a narrator that will speak to the reader.

>Slowly she made her way through the mess, searching carefully for Inkstar, expecting the worst but praying for the best.//

Why is there a line break here? It also feels abit clunky to have two participial phrases stacked up in series like this, particularly since it exacerbates the problem of misplaced modifiers. As phrased, it sounds like the mess is searching, which we can at least sort out with a bit of logic, but it really does sound like Inkstar is the one expecting the worst.

>be you winged or horned or hooved//

Um… aren't they all hooved?

>How like a mother kissing her foal goodnight!//

Since the narrator hasn't settled into a perspective here, I can't tell who's expressing this opinion. The only candidate I can fathom is Luna, but this is a rather detached and flippant sentiment, given how morose she just was over Inkstar's death.

>not reach//

Another extraneous space.

>It filled her stomach and turned it's empty caverns//

Its/it's confusion. It's also confusing to have the first "it" and the one in "its" refer to different things.

>And the unicorn Inkstar, so wronged by the world, so lost, seeking the peace of dreams through opiates to banish her from the real world, only to die by that which gave her escape.//

I have to say that we met her so briefly that I formed no attachment to her. There's some default sympathy for her situation, but I just don't care that much about what happened to her. We saw one nice dream of hers, but for all we know, she was an asshole.

>Why was her night abused//

What about when ponies sleep during the day? Particularly for the sick child, she probably slept during much of the day.

>earth bound//

earthbound

>Why did ponies use it to hide instead of explore?//

This begs the question about daydreams, which are very much in this character. Can Luna see them? Can Celestia?

>She will help fix the pain of nightmares//

Why the tense shift?

>reclined recumbent//

Redundant.

>The concerns of a mortal politician were mere dust motes in the mind of an immortal Sun God. It should be enough for him to merely bask in her glory.//

Okay, you're also blindsiding me with this characterization of Celestia. You can get some leeway to present her like this before giving the explanation, but there needs to be one. Canon is your starting point, and if you're going to play her differently, you have to connect the dots to get me there.

>We must speak with the at once.

thee

>"Princess Luna." she said insistently//

Dialogue punctuation.

>Things that effect the peace of my night as well as your day.//

While you could argue a valid meaning here, it would be unusual. As worded, you are saying these things cause the peace. I believe you meant "affect," as in these things influence the peace, but do not directly cause it.

> treatable. " she paused//

Extraneous space, capitalization.

>We just helped pass another Filly tonight.//

You have a lot of these odd, inconsistent capitalizations. I can't see why you'd capitalize this, and you didn't in the previous sentence.

>Luna paused.//

So, two consecutive actions for her are pauses?

>"And what would you have me do about this."//

It's a question…

>we could reach more ponies in their dreams to try and sooth them.//

soothe

>equestria//

And then you don't capitalize this… I just don't get it.

>"We-"//

Please use a proper dash.

>Celestia, stepping down from her throne, cut her off//

Missing end punctuation, and once again, an action that is redundant with how the quote was punctuated. And another thing: When speech is cut off, the very next thing I read needs to be that interruption. If not, it undercuts the suddenness when the narrator has time to wedge something else in. As such, it feels like Celestia stepping off the throne is what made Luna stop speaking, and I can't imagine why that would be the case, unless you give me an explanation. More likely, Celestia's words stopped Luna, so they should immediately follow the cutoff.

>HOW Princess Luna//

See, when you use multiple ways of emphasizing things, I have no idea what they mean relative to each other. Which part of this is louder? It's better to use the narration and choice of speaking verbs to get this across.

>livlihoods//

livelihoods. Mind the squiggly lines, please. Most of the time. Well, maybe half the time. At least they can spot things like this.

>Step by step, Inch by inch//

All I can think of when I read this was Niagara Falls.

>The frigid wind felt like feathered ice on her coat as the wind rushed over her, exalting her, worshiping her as she willed herself higher and higher.//

Multiple "as" clauses in the sentence make it feel repetitive.

>"And she deserved more. "//

Another extraneous space.

>cottony//

You just used "cotton" earlier in the same paragraph, and the repetition isn't for any evident stylistic reason.

>when those eyes closed ceased too the strain of muscles and the beating of feathered wings//

Awkward phrasing.

>long overdo child//

Overdue

>Cold, panicked anger flushed though Luna's blood. Jealousy and rage and anger assaulted the immortal princess of night before crashing into a wave of despair that nearly choked her.//

There have been little bits and pieces throughout, but this is hugely telly and serves only to distance me from her. I connect to a character by figuring out how she feels from the evidence, not by having it fed to me. Look through the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>"I'M WARNING YOU. I GOT'S A RAKE!"//

This is a serious shift of tone. It's almost funny, and I don't think it was supposed to be.

There are obviously some mechanical issues. Things I had to mark several times? Those'd be the ones. And I didn't mark every one, or even the majority—just enough to give you the gist of what to look for.

On a stylistic note, the two biggest problems were the jerky narration and repetition. I've onge on about the head hopping already and pointed out numerous example of the repetition. But here's one I haven't mentioned yet: to be. In your first chapter, just the "was" form appears 27 times. That's a huge amount for this word count. Consider also that it's an inherently boring verb. I'd much rather read about what happens, not what is. Overuse of this verb points to telling problems (there were a few), too much passive voice (only a little here), and a need to choose more active verbs (that'd be the biggie).

On a characterization front, I'd just say it's an interesting reversal of the presumed attitudes of Luna and Celestia, but so far I've seen no bridge between canon Celestia and your portrayal of her. You can't string a reader along but so far without drawing that line between them and expect him to stay interested. Luna's feelings are also a bit empty, since I don't feel them with her. We don't get to know the two who died enough to care about them, so we don't have a default position to sympathize with Luna, and we don't even really see her emotions on display about it, either.

You do have a knack for description, though it tends toward purple at times. When in Luna's perspective, that may suit her to a degree, but it won't serve all your characters, particularly if you keep switching points of view.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;another torrent of tears //</span><br />When was the first?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wordlessly the two adults left the room.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;That should keep her asleep for a while,&quot; the doctor reported.//</span><br />This is an odd juxtaposition. They leave wordlessly, then there are immediately words. Give me a transition. Where did they go? How much time passed?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her voice trailed off desperately.//</span><br />The ellipsis already shows her trailing off. You don&#039;t need to repeat it in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Doctor Clearwater had trained for years to be a doctor//</span><br />I bet you can rephrase that to avoid repeating &quot;doctor.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sight of her alone brought another torrent of tears streaming down her eyes//</span><br />This is clearly from the mother&#039;s perspective, and it&#039;s only the story&#039;s second paragraph. In the third, it&#039;s unclear that there is a perspective. Then in the fifth, we get this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he felt bitter that this mare would even make him say it//</span><br />Don&#039;t jerk the reader around with frequent changes of perspective like this. The longer you stay in one perspective, the more the reader identifies with that character and cares about him/her. Have a look at the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There are worse odds than a coin toss.//</span><br />I hardly think his prognosis would be this dire for something he could only approximate as less than 50/50. Those are actually not bad odds for many serious conditions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even without looking//</span><br />Participles are normally set off with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Don&#039;t make me say it, you bitch, he thought</i>//</span><br />Wow. This is coming out of nowhere. What motivation would he have to be this mad at her? If he&#039;s studied to be a doctor as much as you imply, this is also something they&#039;re trained to handle. He&#039;d tell the truth, cushion it as much as he felt was warranted, and stand by the facts. If there&#039;s some history here that&#039;s influencing him, you need to go into it to get me there. And the &quot;he thought&quot; part isn&#039;t actually his thought. It wouldn&#039;t be italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;SOME//</span><br />Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis, except in the case of the Royal Canterlot Voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her mane, nearly as ragged as her daughter&#039;s, fell messily around her face in a way that was oddly alluring. Even her misery was tragically beautiful.//</span><br />And after silently cussing her out, he&#039;s now attracted to her in her moment of pain? I am now officially creeped out by this character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she began to sob//</span><br />Why &quot;began&quot;? You already had her sobbing in the first paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If only she had recognized the early signs, if only the doctor had diagnosed Windflower quicker//</span><br />And now you&#039;ve switched perspectives within a single paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Outside the night had fallen unnoticed and a cold October breeze whistled through the trees.//</span><br />See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maybe she will have a bit of peace//</span><br />If this is a thought, as indicated, italicize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;there came a point in which//</span><br />Usually phrased &quot;at which.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tear swollen//</span><br />Hyphenate compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You are right, Princess. I do not know where I am going, but I have to keep going. It&#039;s time for me to stop being afraid.//</span><br />That was a rather quick change of heart. Really, it signifies that the central conflict of this chapter was no big deal. There was no struggle to achieve the goal, much like going grocery shopping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;equestrian//</span><br />Capitalization, unless you literally mean &quot;one who rides on horseback.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she fell into the dream//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Casting the Princess one more brisk glance//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent in capitalizing &quot;princess.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;movable press//</span><br />You should probably go with &quot;printing press&quot; or &quot;movable type.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>such joy</i>!//</span><br />When ! or ? is attached to an italicized word, it&#039;s normally italicized as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;made, this//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your royal highness//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We would love to see thy progress.//</span><br />You&#039;re being inconsistent with her archaic speech. Here, from chapter 1:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Child, why do you weep so?&quot;//</span><br />This would be: &quot;Child, why dost thou weep so?&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>corner stone</i>//</span><br />cornerstone<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(Somewhat un-princess like)//</span><br />First, this wouldn&#039;t be capitalized. Second, actual parentheses work best in articles of writing, like a journal entry, or possibly in a first-person or very subjective third-person narration. But in an objective narration, it feels out of place, and in any narration, you could just as easily use dashes or possibly commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No longer did desks and ink and parchment fill the room, instead it was dominated by a series of heavy presses//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a moments confusion//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Good morning, your highness,&quot; bowed a thickly built red stalltion//</span><br />Your attribution has no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b>!!!!Grandpappy Flam&#039;s Miracle Elixer</b>!!!</span><br />Is there a reason for the asymmetric number of exclamation marks and their boldness? And is the misspelling intentional?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A common street remedy for every pain you can think of//</span><br />I know it can be tricky to avoid some phrasings that address the reader, but you really should. It feels out of place to suddenly do this when you haven&#039;t established a narrator that will speak to the reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Slowly she made her way through the mess, searching carefully for Inkstar, expecting the worst but praying for the best.//</span><br />Why is there a line break here? It also feels abit clunky to have two participial phrases stacked up in series like this, particularly since it exacerbates the problem of misplaced modifiers. As phrased, it sounds like the mess is searching, which we can at least sort out with a bit of logic, but it really does sound like Inkstar is the one expecting the worst.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>be you winged or horned or hooved</i>//</span><br />Um… aren&#039;t they all hooved?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How like a mother kissing her foal goodnight!//</span><br />Since the narrator hasn&#039;t settled into a perspective here, I can&#039;t tell who&#039;s expressing this opinion. The only candidate I can fathom is Luna, but this is a rather detached and flippant sentiment, given how morose she just was over Inkstar&#039;s death.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not reach//</span><br />Another extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It filled her stomach and turned it&#039;s empty caverns//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion. It&#039;s also confusing to have the first &quot;it&quot; and the one in &quot;its&quot; refer to different things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And the unicorn Inkstar, so wronged by the world, so lost, seeking the peace of dreams through opiates to banish her from the real world, only to die by that which gave her escape.//</span><br />I have to say that we met her so briefly that I formed no attachment to her. There&#039;s some default sympathy for her situation, but I just don&#039;t care that much about what happened to her. We saw one nice dream of hers, but for all we know, she was an asshole.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why was her night abused//</span><br />What about when ponies sleep during the day? Particularly for the sick child, she probably slept during much of the day.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;earth bound//</span><br />earthbound<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why did ponies use it to hide instead of explore?//</span><br />This begs the question about daydreams, which are very much in this character. Can Luna see them? Can Celestia?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She will help fix the pain of nightmares//</span><br />Why the tense shift?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reclined recumbent//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The concerns of a mortal politician were mere dust motes in the mind of an immortal Sun God. It should be enough for him to merely bask in her glory.//</span><br />Okay, you&#039;re also blindsiding me with this characterization of Celestia. You can get some leeway to present her like this before giving the explanation, but there needs to be one. Canon is your starting point, and if you&#039;re going to play her differently, you have to connect the dots to get me there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b>We must speak with the at once.</b></span><br />thee<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Princess Luna.&quot; she said insistently//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Things that effect the peace of my night as well as your day.//</span><br />While you could argue a valid meaning here, it would be unusual. As worded, you are saying these things cause the peace. I believe you meant &quot;affect,&quot; as in these things influence the peace, but do not directly cause it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; treatable. &quot; she paused//</span><br />Extraneous space, capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We just helped pass another Filly tonight.//</span><br />You have a lot of these odd, inconsistent capitalizations. I can&#039;t see why you&#039;d capitalize this, and you didn&#039;t in the previous sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna paused.//</span><br />So, two consecutive actions for her are pauses?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;And what would you have me do about this.&quot;//</span><br />It&#039;s a question…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we could reach more ponies in their dreams to try and sooth them.//</span><br />soothe<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;equestria//</span><br />And then you don&#039;t capitalize this… I just don&#039;t get it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;We-&quot;//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia, stepping down from her throne, cut her off//</span><br />Missing end punctuation, and once again, an action that is redundant with how the quote was punctuated. And another thing: When speech is cut off, the very next thing I read needs to be that interruption. If not, it undercuts the suddenness when the narrator has time to wedge something else in. As such, it feels like Celestia stepping off the throne is what made Luna stop speaking, and I can&#039;t imagine why that would be the case, unless you give me an explanation. More likely, Celestia&#039;s words stopped Luna, so they should immediately follow the cutoff.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;HOW <i>Princess Luna</i>//</span><br />See, when you use multiple ways of emphasizing things, I have no idea what they mean relative to each other. Which part of this is louder? It&#039;s better to use the narration and choice of speaking verbs to get this across.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;livlihoods//</span><br />livelihoods. Mind the squiggly lines, please. Most of the time. Well, maybe half the time. At least they can spot things like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Step by step, Inch by inch//</span><br />All I can think of when I read this was Niagara Falls.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The frigid wind felt like feathered ice on her coat as the wind rushed over her, exalting her, worshiping her as she willed herself higher and higher.//</span><br />Multiple &quot;as&quot; clauses in the sentence make it feel repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;<i>And she deserved more.</i> &quot;//</span><br />Another extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cottony//</span><br />You just used &quot;cotton&quot; earlier in the same paragraph, and the repetition isn&#039;t for any evident stylistic reason.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when those eyes closed ceased too the strain of muscles and the beating of feathered wings//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long overdo child//</span><br />Overdue<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cold, panicked anger flushed though Luna&#039;s blood. Jealousy and rage and anger assaulted the immortal princess of night before crashing into a wave of despair that nearly choked her.//</span><br />There have been little bits and pieces throughout, but this is hugely telly and serves only to distance me from her. I connect to a character by figuring out how she feels from the evidence, not by having it fed to me. Look through the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b>&quot;I&#039;M WARNING YOU. I GOT&#039;S A RAKE!&quot;</b>//</span><br />This is a serious shift of tone. It&#039;s almost funny, and I don&#039;t think it was supposed to be.<br /><br />There are obviously some mechanical issues. Things I had to mark several times? Those&#039;d be the ones. And I didn&#039;t mark every one, or even the majority—just enough to give you the gist of what to look for.<br /><br />On a stylistic note, the two biggest problems were the jerky narration and repetition. I&#039;ve onge on about the head hopping already and pointed out numerous example of the repetition. But here&#039;s one I haven&#039;t mentioned yet: to be. In your first chapter, just the &quot;was&quot; form appears 27 times. That&#039;s a huge amount for this word count. Consider also that it&#039;s an inherently boring verb. I&#039;d much rather read about what happens, not what is. Overuse of this verb points to telling problems (there were a few), too much passive voice (only a little here), and a need to choose more active verbs (that&#039;d be the biggie).<br /><br />On a characterization front, I&#039;d just say it&#039;s an interesting reversal of the presumed attitudes of Luna and Celestia, but so far I&#039;ve seen no bridge between canon Celestia and your portrayal of her. You can&#039;t string a reader along but so far without drawing that line between them and expect him to stay interested. Luna&#039;s feelings are also a bit empty, since I don&#039;t feel them with her. We don&#039;t get to know the two who died enough to care about them, so we don&#039;t have a default position to sympathize with Luna, and we don&#039;t even really see her emotions on display about it, either.<br /><br />You do have a knack for description, though it tends toward purple at times. When in Luna&#039;s perspective, that may suit her to a degree, but it won&#039;t serve all your characters, particularly if you keep switching points of view.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 66

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>were crammed//

Up front in the story is not the best place for passive voice, especially when you could avoid it altogether by simply substituting "had" for "were."

>the royal palace//

I waffle myself on what to call the place, but they have referred to it in canon as Canterlot Castle.

>to have witnessed such an event//

You just used "witness" earlier in the paragraph. Watch the repetition.

>”,m wewwy bword,”//

I have to say, I've never been a fan of indicating volume through font size. It's kind of a lazy way of getting around having to describe it in narration. I'm also not sure what that first comma is doing there, and it appears to have flipped the smart quotes the wrong way at the beginning.

>Boredom - the complete absence of fun.//

Well… lack of engaging activity, not necessarily fun. But that's a minor point. Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen, but I think a colon would be more appropriate here anyway, since you're defining the term.

>as she continued to brush her mane.//

Okay, I'll speak up about this. You first had a "began to brush her mane" statement. I didn't say anything then, since it was the first instance of this in the story, but it's a common verb to overuse. Every action begins. It's only worth pointing out the beginning when it's notable for some reason, like it's an abrupt change, or the action gets interrupted. I let it slide, since it looks so far like it won't be a frequent issue for you, but then you go on with a "continued brushing" action, which is again something very obvious. Switch it up. Add a twist to the action, give it a bit more character.

>She finished brushing her mane//

Okay, you completed the trifecta of obvious statements.

>“Oh, you needn't actually do anything,” Celestia clarified, “Just keep an eye on her.//

Dialogue capitalization/punctuation. You probably meant to have "just" in lower case, but I'd argue that sits too close to a comma splice, so I'd recommend putting a period after "clarified."

>She turned to face Luna, bemused.//

Probably the first time I've caught you being telly, so good on that front. Of course, you don't always have to show, but I would like to see this expression from her instead of having it summed up for me.

>It was very difficult for her, even as a ruler of an entire country, to deny her sister when she used that tactic.//

I almost commented on this earlier, but I have to say something now. Your first paragraph made a statement that wouldn't be outwardly obvious ("This was a momentous occasion, after all, for there were few in attendance who could claim to have witnessed such an event within their lifetimes as was occurring here today.") Thus it's from a specific perspective, to a degree—kind of the crowd's mindset. But then you switch into Luna's perspective. I didn't mind that so much, since the crows mind helped establish the setting and wasn't a specific character anyway. But after spending the whole story in Luna's head, you suddenly bump us over in to Celestia's for the grand total of one paragraph. Perspective shifts can be done, but they need to be smooth and necessary. Is this information vital? Can it only be told through Celestia's perspective and not read from her by another's perception? And if it is necessary, surely it's worth staying with her for a while.

>deep in thought.//

Removable. Your description of her already gets this across.

>No matter how she looked at it, her inability to get the hang of flying just didn't make any sense to her.//

And here you go again. You were in Pinkie's point of view, so why switch to Twilight's? You could convey this same information through Twilight's body language as seen by Pinkie. Edit: I thought you were going to stay with Pinkie, since she's listed as a main character, but it would probably work better to have this scene entirely in Twilight's perspective and rework the little bit that was in Pinkie's head. You can get somewhat of a pass on this in comedy, as internal reactions can carry much of the humor, but it's just too much here.

>with concern.//

A common type of telly language. These prepositional phrases are almost always redundant with the description or action they follow.

>in annoyance//

And again. Get rid of these. If you think what's left isn't clear, you can add a bit more description.

>royalty?//

Commonly, a ? or ! will be italicized when it's on an italicized word.

>Princess Luna, however, was quick to grab hold of a chance to avoid having to watch Twilight all day.//

>Not even Twilight could resist staring open-mouthed at the princess. Surely she hadn't just heard what she thought she had heard.//
Yeah, fix that perspective. It's jumping all over the place.

>(much to her annoyance)//

Actual parentheses work best in a very deep perspective or, preferably, in articles of writing, like a diary or letter. In shallower or objective points of view, these often render better with commas or dashes.

>video games, with Luna absolutely crushing Pinkie's high score//

Oh, good. Gamer Luna meme. (Don't mind me. I just hate these, but I won't make you change it.)

>all-too familiar//

You don't need the hyphen.

>"I know, we can go to Sugarcube Corner!" she beamed.//

That speaking verb… How does one beam a sentence?

>"…and//

Even though it doesn't actually start the sentence, capitalize. Lower case is for when we had the beginning of the sentence earlier, and it's picking back up.

>Let us go inside and you can show me more//

Missing comma between the clauses.

>welcome, princess//

As a term of address, "Princess" would be capitalized.

>Sweetie darling,//

These are separate terms of direct address, so put a comma between them.

>H-hello, princess!//

Same.

>Pinkie suddenly gasped, interrupting her.//

Two things: The previous dialogue trailed off, which isn't an interruption, and once that's fixed, the speech will already indicate an interruption; you don't need to reiterate it here.

>Mrs. Cake looked scandalized//

And how does this look?

>She and Pinkie were sitting at a table outside, admiring the absurdly oversized bag of cotton candy Pinkie had bought for them.//

Note that participles can frequently be misplaced modifiers. By proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the table is admiring the candy. We can discount that with a bit of logic, but then it's ambiguous whether you mean Pinkie, Luna, or both are admiring it.

>amazing!//

Italicize the !. You're inconsistent at this.

>an entire ball of it…" she eyed the bag of candy, "this large//

You've almost got it. Here's how to work in the aside:
an entire ball of it –" she eyed the bag of candy "– this large

>So it had come to this.//

I think you want a colon here.

>hyped up//

Hyphenate.

>careful consideration//

Extraneous space in there.

>on hot days. On this day//

Feels repetitive.

>rocky lake bed//

They're generally just muddy.

>Rainbow, my wings are sore and it's getting late.//

Needs a coma between the clauses.

>Pinkie greeted with a big smile//

Transitive verb requires a direct object.

>Unbeknownst to Princess Luna, ingesting high concentrations of sugar comes with horrible side effects, including terrible belly pains and dehydration, and a low, almost depressing feeling upon coming down from the initial high.//

This is more science lesson than something interesting. Just have her experience those symptoms instead of externalizing them like this.

>doing so caused her head to hurt so she just closed her eyes again and lay still//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

Mechanically, there were a mixed bag of things but just as many appeared to be oversights than consistent problems. So just watch the ones I had to point out multiple times. Note that I didn't point out every instance, just enough to show what the issue is. You have to root out the rest.

In style, I pointed out a few instances of telling. I kind of already explained it, but you might want to read over the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread. The only other things I'd point out are these:

Saidisms. You have about 160 quotes in your story, but you only used "said" seven times. It's a verb designed to blend in and avoid notice. While your choice of speaking verb can lend flavor to your writing, picking unusual ones too often begins to draw attention to them and away from the actual speech, which is a bad thing. YMMV, but I usually aim for a balnce of about 1/3 said, 1/3 other verbs, and 1/3 no tag.

"To be." You use this verb a lot. was/wasn't: 61 times, is/isn't: 36, were/weren't: 15, be/been/being: 56. There will be other hidden ones, too, like in "she's." That's a ton for this word count. It's an inherently boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. This high a count can indicate telly language, too much passive voice, and a need to choose more active verbs.

I rather liked this story. The biggest things that need to be fixed are the deluge of "to be" verbs, the jerky perspective shifts, and some telling. Get those in order, and I'd be happy to post this on the blog.

Resubmit when you're ready, and I'll grab it again so it doesn't have as long a wait again.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;were crammed//</span><br />Up front in the story is not the best place for passive voice, especially when you could avoid it altogether by simply substituting &quot;had&quot; for &quot;were.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the royal palace//</span><br />I waffle myself on what to call the place, but they have referred to it in canon as Canterlot Castle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to have witnessed such an event//</span><br />You just used &quot;witness&quot; earlier in the paragraph. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;”,m wewwy bword,”//</span><br />I have to say, I&#039;ve never been a fan of indicating volume through font size. It&#039;s kind of a lazy way of getting around having to describe it in narration. I&#039;m also not sure what that first comma is doing there, and it appears to have flipped the smart quotes the wrong way at the beginning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Boredom - the complete absence of fun.//</span><br />Well… lack of engaging activity, not necessarily fun. But that&#039;s a minor point. Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen, but I think a colon would be more appropriate here anyway, since you&#039;re defining the term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she continued to brush her mane.//</span><br />Okay, I&#039;ll speak up about this. You first had a &quot;began to brush her mane&quot; statement. I didn&#039;t say anything then, since it was the first instance of this in the story, but it&#039;s a common verb to overuse. Every action begins. It&#039;s only worth pointing out the beginning when it&#039;s notable for some reason, like it&#039;s an abrupt change, or the action gets interrupted. I let it slide, since it looks so far like it won&#039;t be a frequent issue for you, but then you go on with a &quot;continued brushing&quot; action, which is again something very obvious. Switch it up. Add a twist to the action, give it a bit more character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She finished brushing her mane//</span><br />Okay, you completed the trifecta of obvious statements.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh, you needn&#039;t actually do anything,” Celestia clarified, “Just keep an eye on her.//</span><br />Dialogue capitalization/punctuation. You probably meant to have &quot;just&quot; in lower case, but I&#039;d argue that sits too close to a comma splice, so I&#039;d recommend putting a period after &quot;clarified.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned to face Luna, bemused.//</span><br />Probably the first time I&#039;ve caught you being telly, so good on that front. Of course, you don&#039;t always have to show, but I would like to see this expression from her instead of having it summed up for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was very difficult for her, even as a ruler of an entire country, to deny her sister when she used that tactic.//</span><br />I almost commented on this earlier, but I have to say something now. Your first paragraph made a statement that wouldn&#039;t be outwardly obvious (&quot;This was a momentous occasion, after all, for there were few in attendance who could claim to have witnessed such an event within their lifetimes as was occurring here today.&quot;) Thus it&#039;s from a specific perspective, to a degree—kind of the crowd&#039;s mindset. But then you switch into Luna&#039;s perspective. I didn&#039;t mind that so much, since the crows mind helped establish the setting and wasn&#039;t a specific character anyway. But after spending the whole story in Luna&#039;s head, you suddenly bump us over in to Celestia&#039;s for the grand total of one paragraph. Perspective shifts can be done, but they need to be smooth and necessary. Is this information vital? Can it only be told through Celestia&#039;s perspective and not read from her by another&#039;s perception? And if it is necessary, surely it&#039;s worth staying with her for a while.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;deep in thought.//</span><br />Removable. Your description of her already gets this across.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No matter how she looked at it, her inability to get the hang of flying just didn&#039;t make any sense to her.//</span><br />And here you go again. You were in Pinkie&#039;s point of view, so why switch to Twilight&#039;s? You could convey this same information through Twilight&#039;s body language as seen by Pinkie. Edit: I thought you were going to stay with Pinkie, since she&#039;s listed as a main character, but it would probably work better to have this scene entirely in Twilight&#039;s perspective and rework the little bit that was in Pinkie&#039;s head. You can get somewhat of a pass on this in comedy, as internal reactions can carry much of the humor, but it&#039;s just too much here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with concern.//</span><br />A common type of telly language. These prepositional phrases are almost always redundant with the description or action they follow.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in annoyance//</span><br />And again. Get rid of these. If you think what&#039;s left isn&#039;t clear, you can add a bit more description.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>royalty</i>?//</span><br />Commonly, a ? or ! will be italicized when it&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Luna, however, was quick to grab hold of a chance to avoid having to watch Twilight all day.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not even Twilight could resist staring open-mouthed at the princess. Surely she hadn&#039;t just heard what she thought she had heard.//</span><br />Yeah, fix that perspective. It&#039;s jumping all over the place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(much to her annoyance)//</span><br />Actual parentheses work best in a very deep perspective or, preferably, in articles of writing, like a diary or letter. In shallower or objective points of view, these often render better with commas or dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;video games, with Luna absolutely crushing Pinkie&#039;s high score//</span><br />Oh, good. Gamer Luna meme. (Don&#039;t mind me. I just hate these, but I won&#039;t make you change it.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all-too familiar//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I know, we can go to Sugarcube Corner!&quot; she beamed.//</span><br />That speaking verb… How does one beam a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;…and//</span><br />Even though it doesn&#039;t actually start the sentence, capitalize. Lower case is for when we had the beginning of the sentence earlier, and it&#039;s picking back up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Let us go inside and you can show me more//</span><br />Missing comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;welcome, princess//</span><br />As a term of address, &quot;Princess&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie darling,//</span><br />These are separate terms of direct address, so put a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;H-hello, princess!//</span><br />Same.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie suddenly gasped, interrupting her.//</span><br />Two things: The previous dialogue trailed off, which isn&#039;t an interruption, and once that&#039;s fixed, the speech will already indicate an interruption; you don&#039;t need to reiterate it here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mrs. Cake looked scandalized//</span><br />And how does this look?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She and Pinkie were sitting at a table outside, admiring the absurdly oversized bag of cotton candy Pinkie had bought for them.//</span><br />Note that participles can frequently be misplaced modifiers. By proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the table is admiring the candy. We can discount that with a bit of logic, but then it&#039;s ambiguous whether you mean Pinkie, Luna, or both are admiring it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;amazing!//</span><br />Italicize the !. You&#039;re inconsistent at this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an entire ball of it…&quot; she eyed the bag of candy, &quot;<i>this</i> large//</span><br />You&#039;ve almost got it. Here&#039;s how to work in the aside:<br />an entire ball of it –&quot; she eyed the bag of candy &quot;– <i>this</i> large<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So it had come to this.//</span><br />I think you want a colon here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hyped up//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;careful consideration//</span><br />Extraneous space in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on hot days. On this day//</span><br />Feels repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rocky lake bed//</span><br />They&#039;re generally just muddy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow, my wings are sore and it&#039;s getting late.//</span><br />Needs a coma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie greeted with a big smile//</span><br />Transitive verb requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Unbeknownst to Princess Luna, ingesting high concentrations of sugar comes with horrible side effects, including terrible belly pains and dehydration, and a low, almost depressing feeling upon coming down from the initial high.//</span><br />This is more science lesson than something interesting. Just have her experience those symptoms instead of externalizing them like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;doing so caused her head to hurt so she just closed her eyes again and lay still//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br />Mechanically, there were a mixed bag of things but just as many appeared to be oversights than consistent problems. So just watch the ones I had to point out multiple times. Note that I didn&#039;t point out every instance, just enough to show what the issue is. You have to root out the rest.<br /><br />In style, I pointed out a few instances of telling. I kind of already explained it, but you might want to read over the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread. The only other things I&#039;d point out are these:<br /><br />Saidisms. You have about 160 quotes in your story, but you only used &quot;said&quot; seven times. It&#039;s a verb designed to blend in and avoid notice. While your choice of speaking verb can lend flavor to your writing, picking unusual ones too often begins to draw attention to them and away from the actual speech, which is a bad thing. YMMV, but I usually aim for a balnce of about 1/3 said, 1/3 other verbs, and 1/3 no tag.<br /><br />&quot;To be.&quot; You use this verb a lot. was/wasn&#039;t: 61 times, is/isn&#039;t: 36, were/weren&#039;t: 15, be/been/being: 56. There will be other hidden ones, too, like in &quot;she&#039;s.&quot; That&#039;s a ton for this word count. It&#039;s an inherently boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. This high a count can indicate telly language, too much passive voice, and a need to choose more active verbs.<br /><br />I rather liked this story. The biggest things that need to be fixed are the deluge of &quot;to be&quot; verbs, the jerky perspective shifts, and some telling. Get those in order, and I&#039;d be happy to post this on the blog.<br /><br />Resubmit when you&#039;re ready, and I&#039;ll grab it again so it doesn&#039;t have as long a wait again.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Dec 24th, 2013 12:55</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 67

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>It has been ten years since we've held a Summer Sun Celebration here, after all.//

Almost feels like that "has" should be emphasized.

>Twilight muttered as she unrolled the scroll.//

Okay, two things. First, when you use an unusual speaking verb, it stands out as repetitive when you use it again, unless you space them out quite a bit. You just used "muttered" a few paragraphs ago. Also note this "as" clause. You've been using an awful lot of "as" clauses and participial phrases already. It's giving the narration a repetitive feel to the structure. Another thing to watch is that both of these things imply that actions are simultaneous. I haven't caught you in an impossibility yet, but if you keep using these so much, you're likely to run into that trap at some point.

>annoyance replacing her prior shock//

It's far more effective to demonstrate these moods and get me to infer them than to state them outright. It's the old "show versus tell" problem. What would an outside observer see about her appearance and actions that would lead him to conclude this about her?

>Donut Joe’s//

Did you mean Pony Joe's? Or is this something you're making up for this story?

>she muttered//

You're doing that thing again…

>Discord waited until he was sure Twilight was far enough away, then flicked his talon at the stage.//

I want to caution you here. The scene to this point had been in Twilight's perspective, but you spend this last paragraph in Discord's. Now, such a thing can be done, most often for comedic effect, and at least you spend the whole paragraph there. It will stand out as out of place if this is the only time in the story you do it. I'll keep an eye out for it as I read, but you have to be very careful with perspective shifts and make sure everything you do with them is intentional. Many writers slip between perspective without realizing they're doing it. You might want to read over the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>Come on Cloudchaser//

Missing comma for direct address.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>“—and so then//

Even though it's not really the beginning of the sentence, go ahead and capitalize this. You leave it lower case if this was picking up again from an earlier incomplete sentence, but we don't have that here.

>No sense letting her last foray into romance color the future.//

I've never been a fan of little throwaway lines like this that hint at a lot but never explore any of it.

>Dishes flew everywhere as the thick wood , and for a long second everypony was deathly silent//

Extraneous space, and apparently a missing word there.

>your Highness//

The "Your" is also capitalized in the honorific.

>one simple fact.//

You go on to define or clarify the fact, so a colon would be appropriate here.

>Her frown deepened and she levitated a few napkins over to help bandage the injury.//

You've had the occasional issue with this. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Once they were secure she turned her attention to his head, using a trickle of power to bring him back to wakefulness.//

I'll just point this out as another danger of using participles. They can easily be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, his head is using a trickle of power. We can sort it out with a bit of logic, but they can sound awkward, and if you aren't careful, you will eventually run into one that is ambiguous or outright misleading.

>He shouted incoherently, wings spasming; and//

You do see a few authors do this for effect, but there's really no reason to use both a semicolon and a conjunction. They're redundant.

>The floor chimed as he climbed off the stair, ringing off the columns spaced around the perimeter.//

First off, I have no idea what "the floor chimed" means, given that he's obviously not on an elevator. But now we have a more blatant misplaced modifier. It sounds like the stair is ringing. In fact, I'd go so far as to call it a dangling participle, since the sound effect never appears as a noun, so only the floor or the stairs could be ringing. I'm also not a fan of using a pronoun as the first introduction to a character. Even something generic would work better.

>she was cut off as Pound buzzed his wings, the colt dashing past her into the hallway for the door.//

Capitalization, as this aside isn't inserted inside the quote. But more to the point, when the punctuation already indicates being cut off, you don't need to reiterate that in the narration.

>You know Twilight, a princes//

Another missing comma for direct address, typo.

>Okay then, if it’s not magic, than what is it?//

Than/then confusion.

>keep em to yourself//

Missing apostrophe on "em," and watch the direction your software will want to draw it. Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>Pokemon//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this.

>Sure, it was a little tough at first,” a ripple of laughter ran through the crowd as she smiled, “but together we found our place.//

You're trying to punctuate an aside like an attribution. This way only works if you have a speaking verb. Here's what you want:
Sure, it was a little tough at first—” a ripple of laughter ran through the crowd as she smiled “—but together we found our place.

There are a few consistent problems here. First of all, "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring. I'd much rather read about what happens, not what simply is. You don't actually use that many, but when you do, they occur in clusters, 3 or 4 in a paragraph. Even that's unavoidable at times, but I bet you could break that up some. I also talked earlier about your overuse of participles and "as" clauses. They tend to make the sentence structures repetitive. You use "as" 24 times in chapter 1 and 32 more times in chapter 2. They're not all used in this sense, but most are.

Also have a look at the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. I noticed a few too many of the "happily" and "in excitement" types of telly language for my taste. Just be careful to note what's happening in the story when you do that and decide whether you need to the reader to share that emotion with the character or whether it's an unimportant detail.

The story's actually not bad so far. Tighten these things up a bit, and I could see it on the blog, but I would like to get a better sens of where it's going first. Along those lines, I'd like to see another chapter or a brief summary of what you have planned to make sure you have an engaging idea going forward and that you'll tie in the Pokemon part in a meaningful way instead of just having it tacked on as a "hey, this is cool" thing.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It has been ten years since we&#039;ve held a Summer Sun Celebration here, after all.//</span><br />Almost feels like that &quot;has&quot; should be emphasized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight muttered as she unrolled the scroll.//</span><br />Okay, two things. First, when you use an unusual speaking verb, it stands out as repetitive when you use it again, unless you space them out quite a bit. You just used &quot;muttered&quot; a few paragraphs ago. Also note this &quot;as&quot; clause. You&#039;ve been using an awful lot of &quot;as&quot; clauses and participial phrases already. It&#039;s giving the narration a repetitive feel to the structure. Another thing to watch is that both of these things imply that actions are simultaneous. I haven&#039;t caught you in an impossibility yet, but if you keep using these so much, you&#039;re likely to run into that trap at some point.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;annoyance replacing her prior shock//</span><br />It&#039;s far more effective to demonstrate these moods and get me to infer them than to state them outright. It&#039;s the old &quot;show versus tell&quot; problem. What would an outside observer see about her appearance and actions that would lead him to conclude this about her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Donut Joe’s//</span><br />Did you mean Pony Joe&#039;s? Or is this something you&#039;re making up for this story?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she muttered//</span><br />You&#039;re doing that thing again…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discord waited until he was sure Twilight was far enough away, then flicked his talon at the stage.//</span><br />I want to caution you here. The scene to this point had been in Twilight&#039;s perspective, but you spend this last paragraph in Discord&#039;s. Now, such a thing can be done, most often for comedic effect, and at least you spend the whole paragraph there. It will stand out as out of place if this is the only time in the story you do it. I&#039;ll keep an eye out for it as I read, but you have to be very careful with perspective shifts and make sure everything you do with them is intentional. Many writers slip between perspective without realizing they&#039;re doing it. You might want to read over the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Come on Cloudchaser//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“—and so then//</span><br />Even though it&#039;s not really the beginning of the sentence, go ahead and capitalize this. You leave it lower case if this was picking up again from an earlier incomplete sentence, but we don&#039;t have that here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No sense letting her last foray into romance color the future.//</span><br />I&#039;ve never been a fan of little throwaway lines like this that hint at a lot but never explore any of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dishes flew everywhere as the thick wood , and for a long second everypony was deathly silent//</span><br />Extraneous space, and apparently a missing word there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Highness//</span><br />The &quot;Your&quot; is also capitalized in the honorific.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one simple fact.//</span><br />You go on to define or clarify the fact, so a colon would be appropriate here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her frown deepened and she levitated a few napkins over to help bandage the injury.//</span><br />You&#039;ve had the occasional issue with this. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once they were secure she turned her attention to his head, using a trickle of power to bring him back to wakefulness.//</span><br />I&#039;ll just point this out as another danger of using participles. They can easily be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, his head is using a trickle of power. We can sort it out with a bit of logic, but they can sound awkward, and if you aren&#039;t careful, you will eventually run into one that is ambiguous or outright misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He shouted incoherently, wings spasming; and//</span><br />You do see a few authors do this for effect, but there&#039;s really no reason to use both a semicolon and a conjunction. They&#039;re redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The floor chimed as he climbed off the stair, ringing off the columns spaced around the perimeter.//</span><br />First off, I have no idea what &quot;the floor chimed&quot; means, given that he&#039;s obviously not on an elevator. But now we have a more blatant misplaced modifier. It sounds like the stair is ringing. In fact, I&#039;d go so far as to call it a dangling participle, since the sound effect never appears as a noun, so only the floor or the stairs could be ringing. I&#039;m also not a fan of using a pronoun as the first introduction to a character. Even something generic would work better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was cut off as Pound buzzed his wings, the colt dashing past her into the hallway for the door.//</span><br />Capitalization, as this aside isn&#039;t inserted inside the quote. But more to the point, when the punctuation already indicates being cut off, you don&#039;t need to reiterate that in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You know Twilight, a princes//</span><br />Another missing comma for direct address, typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Okay then, if it’s not magic, than what is it?//</span><br />Than/then confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;keep em to yourself//</span><br />Missing apostrophe on &quot;em,&quot; and watch the direction your software will want to draw it. Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pokemon//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at capitalizing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sure, it was a little tough at first,” a ripple of laughter ran through the crowd as she smiled, “but together we found our place.//</span><br />You&#039;re trying to punctuate an aside like an attribution. This way only works if you have a speaking verb. Here&#039;s what you want:<br />Sure, it was a little tough at first—” a ripple of laughter ran through the crowd as she smiled “—but together we found our place.<br /><br />There are a few consistent problems here. First of all, &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring. I&#039;d much rather read about what happens, not what simply is. You don&#039;t actually use that many, but when you do, they occur in clusters, 3 or 4 in a paragraph. Even that&#039;s unavoidable at times, but I bet you could break that up some. I also talked earlier about your overuse of participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses. They tend to make the sentence structures repetitive. You use &quot;as&quot; 24 times in chapter 1 and 32 more times in chapter 2. They&#039;re not all used in this sense, but most are.<br /><br />Also have a look at the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread. I noticed a few too many of the &quot;happily&quot; and &quot;in excitement&quot; types of telly language for my taste. Just be careful to note what&#039;s happening in the story when you do that and decide whether you need to the reader to share that emotion with the character or whether it&#039;s an unimportant detail.<br /><br />The story&#039;s actually not bad so far. Tighten these things up a bit, and I could see it on the blog, but I would like to get a better sens of where it&#039;s going first. Along those lines, I&#039;d like to see another chapter or a brief summary of what you have planned to make sure you have an engaging idea going forward and that you&#039;ll tie in the Pokemon part in a meaningful way instead of just having it tacked on as a &quot;hey, this is cool&quot; thing.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 68

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>On paper, it seemed like a swell idea.//

If you just tell your story with a first-person narrator, that's one thing. It invites the question of why the narrator wants to tell the story and why I want to listen to him, but there's kind of an unspoken agreement to gloss that over, unless the reader is very picky. However, if you address the reader or create a framing device like this that clearly sets it up as the narrator sitting there and telling me the story, then it's much harder to overlook.

>But most ideas seem that way on paper I suppose.//

Missing comma.

>tough looking//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors.

>Better still, they worst they can send after us//

Typo.

>In light of that Hank found the idea to be agreeable//

Introductory elements don't always have to have commas, particularly in British usage, but without one, it sounds like "that" is trying to start a noun clause.

>hide out//

hideout

>Most of them were drab in color but one stood out from the rest.//

Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. I've already seen a few instances.

>As evening moved onto night//

You need "on to" as separate words here. It means something different.

>but before she could//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>What's what is called?//

That "is" feels extraneous.

>The game silly!//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>Not wanting to provide my real name, my eyes jumped around the cave for something to inspire a different identity.//

You have a genuine dangling participle here. "Not wanting to provide my real name" describes "I," but the speaker never names himself in the sentence. This says that his eyes don't want to reveal his name.

>set down our sleeping bags down//

Watch the repetition.

>When I woke up the next morning//

Another dependent clause needing a comma.

>Diana//

Canon is Diane, iirc.

>Snake Eye, would you mind terribly if I tied up and gagged our resident princess?//

So he's not keeping up the fake names anymore?

>I didn't really have any emotion tied to the act//

And such is the state of this story on the whole. I'm getting a lot of actions described, but little in the way of how any of the characters feel about what's happening. That emotional connection is what makes a story engaging. Be careful how you show emotion, though. In order to head off problems, you might want to look over the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread.

>Ooh, Let's play Princesses now!//

You haven't capitalized "princesses" until now, and there's no reason for "let's" to be capitalized.

>should someone stick around the watch the door//

Typo.

>tough burly//

Coordinate adjectives need a comma between them.

>shouldn't of//

shouldn't have

>Within seconds the cave was filled playful chatter and noise.//

Missing word.

>However, he did return my gaze directly and only sat there like a dumb sack of beans.//

I have to think you meant "didn't."

>Good morning, gentlecolts,"//

Missing your opening quotation marks.

>Not once did he take his eyes of Hank and I.//

People often use "I" when they shouldn't because they're afraid of being wrong. "Me" is actually appropriate here, since it's the object of a preposition. Try taking out "Hank."
"Not once did he take his eyes of I."
Doesn't work.

>clearly enjoying the introductions//

I'll just point this out as a place where you need to show instead of tell. This is his conclusion. What evidence does he base it on? Let me see the same evidence and draw my own conclusion. If you write it well, I'll get where you want me to go.

>leaving Hank and I alone with her father.//

Again, "me." It's a direct object of "leaving."

>it might have allowed Hank and I//

Same deal.

>Pinkie Pie genuinely cares for you both about//

Some wording got jumbled there.

And then you never close up the story with the framing device you introduced at the beginning.

I like this story. It's got a good idea and is a fun little read. But it does need some work. First, there's a fair amount of telly language, but more than that, it often skips getting at the emotional content at all. If already referred you to the info on "show versus tell." Just make sure your story doesn't amount to a simple list of actions. How your characters feel about those actions is just as important, and it's what draws the reader into the story. Next, you need to put some thought into your framing device. It feels slapped on and doesn't do anything to enhance the story. Thus, it's dead weight. Either go without it or put some more work into making it effective. On a stylistic side, I'll warn you about your speaking verbs. I'm not sure there was a single one you used more than two or three times. The verb "said" is designed to blend in. It doesn't call attention to itself and lets the speech carry the focus. While it's nice to mix in some other ones for flavor, if you do it too often, the writing itself steals focus from what the story is saying, which is bad. I found myself noticing which speaking verbs you were using, so my attention was split from the story. I usually aim for an even split between "said," a mix of other verbs, and going without an attribution. YMMV, but you don't want to end up at one extreme end of that spectrum.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On paper, it seemed like a swell idea.//</span><br />If you just tell your story with a first-person narrator, that&#039;s one thing. It invites the question of why the narrator wants to tell the story and why I want to listen to him, but there&#039;s kind of an unspoken agreement to gloss that over, unless the reader is very picky. However, if you address the reader or create a framing device like this that clearly sets it up as the narrator sitting there and telling me the story, then it&#039;s much harder to overlook.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But most ideas seem that way on paper I suppose.//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tough looking//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Better still, they worst they can send after us//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In light of that Hank found the idea to be agreeable//</span><br />Introductory elements don&#039;t always have to have commas, particularly in British usage, but without one, it sounds like &quot;that&quot; is trying to start a noun clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hide out//</span><br />hideout<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Most of them were drab in color but one stood out from the rest.//</span><br />Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. I&#039;ve already seen a few instances.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As evening moved onto night//</span><br />You need &quot;on to&quot; as separate words here. It means something different.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before she could//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What&#039;s what is called?//</span><br />That &quot;is&quot; feels extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The game silly!//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not wanting to provide my real name, my eyes jumped around the cave for something to inspire a different identity.//</span><br />You have a genuine dangling participle here. &quot;Not wanting to provide my real name&quot; describes &quot;I,&quot; but the speaker never names himself in the sentence. This says that his eyes don&#039;t want to reveal his name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;set down our sleeping bags down//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I woke up the next morning//</span><br />Another dependent clause needing a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diana//</span><br />Canon is Diane, iirc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Snake Eye, would you mind terribly if I tied up and gagged our resident princess?//</span><br />So he&#039;s not keeping up the fake names anymore?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn&#039;t really have any emotion tied to the act//</span><br />And such is the state of this story on the whole. I&#039;m getting a lot of actions described, but little in the way of how any of the characters feel about what&#039;s happening. That emotional connection is what makes a story engaging. Be careful how you show emotion, though. In order to head off problems, you might want to look over the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ooh, Let&#039;s play Princesses now!//</span><br />You haven&#039;t capitalized &quot;princesses&quot; until now, and there&#039;s no reason for &quot;let&#039;s&quot; to be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;should someone stick around the watch the door//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tough burly//</span><br />Coordinate adjectives need a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shouldn&#039;t of//</span><br />shouldn&#039;t have<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Within seconds the cave was filled playful chatter and noise.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;However, he did return my gaze directly and only sat there like a dumb sack of beans.//</span><br />I have to think you meant &quot;didn&#039;t.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Good morning, gentlecolts,&quot;//</span><br />Missing your opening quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not once did he take his eyes of Hank and I.//</span><br />People often use &quot;I&quot; when they shouldn&#039;t because they&#039;re afraid of being wrong. &quot;Me&quot; is actually appropriate here, since it&#039;s the object of a preposition. Try taking out &quot;Hank.&quot;<br />&quot;Not once did he take his eyes of I.&quot;<br />Doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;clearly enjoying the introductions//</span><br />I&#039;ll just point this out as a place where you need to show instead of tell. This is his conclusion. What evidence does he base it on? Let me see the same evidence and draw my own conclusion. If you write it well, I&#039;ll get where you want me to go.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaving Hank and I alone with her father.//</span><br />Again, &quot;me.&quot; It&#039;s a direct object of &quot;leaving.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it might have allowed Hank and I//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie genuinely cares for you both about//</span><br />Some wording got jumbled there.<br /><br />And then you never close up the story with the framing device you introduced at the beginning.<br /><br />I like this story. It&#039;s got a good idea and is a fun little read. But it does need some work. First, there&#039;s a fair amount of telly language, but more than that, it often skips getting at the emotional content at all. If already referred you to the info on &quot;show versus tell.&quot; Just make sure your story doesn&#039;t amount to a simple list of actions. How your characters feel about those actions is just as important, and it&#039;s what draws the reader into the story. Next, you need to put some thought into your framing device. It feels slapped on and doesn&#039;t do anything to enhance the story. Thus, it&#039;s dead weight. Either go without it or put some more work into making it effective. On a stylistic side, I&#039;ll warn you about your speaking verbs. I&#039;m not sure there was a single one you used more than two or three times. The verb &quot;said&quot; is designed to blend in. It doesn&#039;t call attention to itself and lets the speech carry the focus. While it&#039;s nice to mix in some other ones for flavor, if you do it too often, the writing itself steals focus from what the story is saying, which is bad. I found myself noticing which speaking verbs you were using, so my attention was split from the story. I usually aim for an even split between &quot;said,&quot; a mix of other verbs, and going without an attribution. YMMV, but you don&#039;t want to end up at one extreme end of that spectrum.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 69

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The night was silent and peaceful; as though nothing could ever go amiss.//

Misused semicolon. And this is disturbingly akin to "It was a dark and stormy night" as an opening line.

>Night birds trilled shrilly but their voices would not carry.//

Check out the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>She was the darkness; she was the moon itself. She was Princess Luna.//

You sure you don't mean Batman?

>to feel the strong and passionate grief//

Extraneous space in there, and this is rather telly language. That can be acceptable in places, but at the beginning of the story is a bad time to put that distance between the reader and your character. Have a look at the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread.

>Luna choked back the tears that threatened at her wide navy eyes//

That "at" is extraneous.

>"Shining Armor," She put on her most dignified voice, "What brings you here?"//

Your attribution has no speaking verb, and it's capitalized wrong, anyway.

>Armor lost his unbalanced discomfort and sat with a sudden ease.//

>He leaned over, peering through the night into Luna's distressed face.//
A couple more examples of where you bluntly tell me a character's mood or emotion. I sense this will be a consistent problem.

>but he//

Another extraneous space. You might want to do a Ctrl-f for two spaces.

>excitedly//

Besides being telly, you just used this adverb for Shining Armor not a few sentences ago.

>Luna though fiercely//

Typo.

>but her legacy will live on//

Inconsistent verb tense.

A note on word repetition: you use "smile" 7 times in this chapter, which isn't that much, but they all occur within 8 paragraphs of each other.

>whom was her own father's grandmother//

who

>never witnessed its glory, it's beauty//

Its/it's confusion.

>Snow Sparkle's cottage laid//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Now she could almost see the fuzzy white tip of the mountain.//

This ends only the second paragraph of this chapter, and you've already used "mountain" 7 times.

>the quick expel//

The noun form is "expulsion."

>Hardened sleet hailed//

This is just a big mishmash. Sleet is hardened by nature, and it doesn't hail. It sleets.

>From her perch she could see the faint candle light glow of her home and the distant hills of Equestria; if she looked hard enough.//

Another misused semicolon.

Really, the rest is just the same problems over and over again.

To sum up, the major issues were telly language, dialogue capitalization and punctuation, coma use, semicolon use, and repetition.

Another word about that last one: In your first chapter, I had to get pretty far in before I saw much variation in sentence structure. Almost every one began with the subject, and they all had about the same length. It gets your writing in a rut. And beware of the verb "to be." It's a boring verb, but one many writers tend to overuse. You had 22 instances of "was" alone in the first chapter. That's even a little more frequent than once every other sentence. You need to choose more active verbs.

The conflict is also a bit on the weak side. When Snow Sparkle finds her talent, she doesn't have much of a reaction to it. She resents it beforehand, but once she's found it, she's rather stoic. Her emotional development on this issue is what will engage the reader, and it's just not there. Instead, it seems to be played more for Luna's benefit, but she doesn't have much reaction either. And their decision to sequester Snow Sparkle up in the mountains to basically force her into finding a talent they suspect she has is rather cruel. Why do they do this? That's not that standard. Take the CMCs, for example. They're allowed their freedom to find their talents at their own pace. Why be so rigorous with Snow Sparkle?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The night was silent and peaceful; as though nothing could ever go amiss.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. And this is disturbingly akin to &quot;It was a dark and stormy night&quot; as an opening line.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Night birds trilled shrilly but their voices would not carry.//</span><br />Check out the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was the darkness; she was the moon itself. She was Princess Luna.//</span><br />You sure you don&#039;t mean Batman?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to feel the strong and passionate grief//</span><br />Extraneous space in there, and this is rather telly language. That can be acceptable in places, but at the beginning of the story is a bad time to put that distance between the reader and your character. Have a look at the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna choked back the tears that threatened at her wide navy eyes//</span><br />That &quot;at&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Shining Armor,&quot; She put on her most dignified voice, &quot;What brings you here?&quot;//</span><br />Your attribution has no speaking verb, and it&#039;s capitalized wrong, anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Armor lost his unbalanced discomfort and sat with a sudden ease.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He leaned over, peering through the night into Luna&#039;s distressed face.//</span><br />A couple more examples of where you bluntly tell me a character&#039;s mood or emotion. I sense this will be a consistent problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but he//</span><br />Another extraneous space. You might want to do a Ctrl-f for two spaces.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;excitedly//</span><br />Besides being telly, you just used this adverb for Shining Armor not a few sentences ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna though fiercely//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but her legacy will live on//</span><br />Inconsistent verb tense.<br /><br />A note on word repetition: you use &quot;smile&quot; 7 times in this chapter, which isn&#039;t that much, but they all occur within 8 paragraphs of each other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whom was her own father&#039;s grandmother//</span><br />who<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;never witnessed its glory, it&#039;s beauty//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Snow Sparkle&#039;s cottage laid//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now she could almost see the fuzzy white tip of the mountain.//</span><br />This ends only the second paragraph of this chapter, and you&#039;ve already used &quot;mountain&quot; 7 times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the quick expel//</span><br />The noun form is &quot;expulsion.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hardened sleet hailed//</span><br />This is just a big mishmash. Sleet is hardened by nature, and it doesn&#039;t hail. It sleets.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;From her perch she could see the faint candle light glow of her home and the distant hills of Equestria; if she looked hard enough.//</span><br />Another misused semicolon.<br /><br />Really, the rest is just the same problems over and over again.<br /><br />To sum up, the major issues were telly language, dialogue capitalization and punctuation, coma use, semicolon use, and repetition.<br /><br />Another word about that last one: In your first chapter, I had to get pretty far in before I saw much variation in sentence structure. Almost every one began with the subject, and they all had about the same length. It gets your writing in a rut. And beware of the verb &quot;to be.&quot; It&#039;s a boring verb, but one many writers tend to overuse. You had 22 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone in the first chapter. That&#039;s even a little more frequent than once every other sentence. You need to choose more active verbs.<br /><br />The conflict is also a bit on the weak side. When Snow Sparkle finds her talent, she doesn&#039;t have much of a reaction to it. She resents it beforehand, but once she&#039;s found it, she&#039;s rather stoic. Her emotional development on this issue is what will engage the reader, and it&#039;s just not there. Instead, it seems to be played more for Luna&#039;s benefit, but she doesn&#039;t have much reaction either. And their decision to sequester Snow Sparkle up in the mountains to basically force her into finding a talent they suspect she has is rather cruel. Why do they do this? That&#039;s not that standard. Take the CMCs, for example. They&#039;re allowed their freedom to find their talents at their own pace. Why be so rigorous with Snow Sparkle?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 70

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Do you have any questions about what I just told you?” he asks something along those lines.//

That's not a dialogue attribution. Really, it's a separate sentence. Also, you go on using only "he" for quite some time. I've scanned ahead a few paragraphs and see nothing but that. It's best to establish that character early, most times before you ever use a pronoun for reference. You don't have to name him; something generic like "the pony" can even work, just so your pronouns have an antecedent.

>they look pale, he should have them redone//

Comma splice.

>I know it not now, but from memory; I can’t see anything right now, but I remember that before now it couldn’t have be seen as too much different.//

That's an awfully jumbled thought that reiterates a couple of things. Plus, there's a verb form error and three instances of "now" in the same sentence.

>I presume that, even if I did//

That comma is unnecessary.

>The white light above us doesn’t help, it’s getting in the way of things.//

Another comma splice.

>I feel at ease.//

It's a more engaging read when you give me the symptoms instead of the diagnosis. Describe what effect being at ease has on her and let me conclude how she feels. You might want to have a look at the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>I usually use my magic, I’m very good at it; although it feels nice, opening a door on my own.//

The first comma is a splice, and the semicolon is misused—there isn't an independent clause after it.

>I can see the cracks on the sidewalk and the ants that live there//

Ants out on a sidewalk wet enough that it's splashing on her?

>Why would someone pick a favorite color? I had asked him. Is there any point to it? A color is a color, what makes one a favorite?//

Why are you punctuating dialogue like thoughts?

>Even when they’re young//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>dancing the ever waltz//

Missing a word there? Something like "ever-present"?

>How instinctual could it have become, now, that we are born to exemplify the very rules we as children set out to protest, just in our own right?//

That second comma can go. However, the main thing here is that the narrative voice is wavering between simple, dazed-sounding speech and philosophical posturing. From what I know of her situation so far, it's not impossible that her mind is actually oscillating like this, but aside from the narration itself, there's nothing to indicate why. There's no emotional attachment to what she's saying that seems to drive her mood in these directions. It's like riding in a car blindfolded. You feel the turns, but you don't know why you're turning and can't anticipate them. You can get some leeway for this, but at some point, you have to provide some motivation, or it just feels directionless. We'll see how far you take it.

>had ran//

had run

>It is as if to say that only when frozen, only when tested past the capacity of its endurance does something become one with that which is around it, and even then that bond can be shattered thoughtlessly by the smallest, most insignificant force.//

Repetition of "test" from the previous sentence. I'm also not following your metaphor here. It took a pretty big force to crack the frozen dirt. Frozen soil is stronger, after all, but then you go on the call that strength insignificant. And how is that cracked soil "becoming one with that which is around it"?

>something as minuscule as a rabbit’s paw can still shatter it into a million pieces.//

A rabbit's paw isn't going to do much to soil unless it's extremely loose or wet. It won't do anything to frozen soil. None of this is ringing true. You don't want your story's primary emotional thread sounding like psychobabble.

>There would be time, endless time, such an amount of time that the greatest mathematicians of our world would find it incalculable, only frustrating.//

Mathematicians are specially equipped to deal with concepts of infinity. You keep sacrificing meaning for poetic gradiloquence.

>The streets around me appear empty//

"Appear" wouldn't enter into it. She has an unobstructed view of them. She'd know explicitly whether they were empty.

>Her body is covered by a light brown jacket, a compliment to the stetson hat and red scarf she wears.//

"Stetson" is a proper noun (and, incidentally, not really what she wears, but so many authors use it that I can let it slide). And you've confused "compliment" with "complement."

>Her blonde mane runs freely down her neck, lacking in the usual red bands that would hold her ponytail together.//

I've noticed several of these misplaced modifiers. Participles are common for them. By proximity, it sounds like her neck is lacking in the usual red bands.

>“You must be”—she bites her lip and pulls her scarf tighter—“freezing, Twi’.//

"Twi" is just a nickname. You don't need the apostrophe. Also, presuming that biting her lip necessitates a momentary stop in her speech, put the dashes inside the quotes to indicate that pause.

>Her concern is more than obvious, she isn’t attempting to hide it.//

So what does this look like?

>Am I so important as to inflict pain upon someone else just temporarily relieve my own?//

Missing word.

>for awhile//

"A while" and "awhile" are interchangeable in some respects, but not when you need a noun. Here, "for" requires an object, so it should be two words.

>happily sipping their hot chocolate as they sit and talk about nothing but their favorite colors.//

This also feels incredibly inconsistent. Maybe it's only Twilight's perception of what's going on inside, but she just spent a while going on about Applejack's depth and sincerity, then in her next breath she's condemning her as just another shallow reveler? If you tried to build up AJ as a character, you just tore her back down.

The only consistent mechanical thing I saw was comma splices, so pretty good on that front.

Stylistically, this is full of narrative whiplash. Twilight's in a daze one moment and then waxing poetic in the next without any reason for the change. Applejack's a deep thinker and treasured friend one moment and a superficial partygoer the next. And too many of the metaphors are built up with fancy verbiage to obscure their nonsensical meanings. I'll also point out the sheer number of colons and semicolons. There are 24 in only 2600 words. You don't want a writing tic like this drawing attention to itself, to where the reader notices things about the writing itself. It breaks immersion.

Plot-wise, nothing happens. The only thing that can be called a conflict is Twilight's decision whether to tell Applejack what's troubling her, but that comes and goes in less than a page. We never get the first inkling of what Twilight's problem is, and nobody does anything about it. Twilight doesn't undergo any character growth as a result. You have a scene here, but not a story. What changed? What was at stake? What goal did anyone have? What bad thing would have happened if that goal weren't achieved? I've seen you make that exact criticism of a story before.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do you have any questions about what I just told you?” he asks something along those lines.//</span><br />That&#039;s not a dialogue attribution. Really, it&#039;s a separate sentence. Also, you go on using only &quot;he&quot; for quite some time. I&#039;ve scanned ahead a few paragraphs and see nothing but that. It&#039;s best to establish that character early, most times before you ever use a pronoun for reference. You don&#039;t have to name him; something generic like &quot;the pony&quot; can even work, just so your pronouns have an antecedent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they look pale, he should have them redone//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know it not now, but from memory; I can’t see anything right now, but I remember that before now it couldn’t have be seen as too much different.//</span><br />That&#039;s an awfully jumbled thought that reiterates a couple of things. Plus, there&#039;s a verb form error and three instances of &quot;now&quot; in the same sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I presume that, even if I did//</span><br />That comma is unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The white light above us doesn’t help, it’s getting in the way of things.//</span><br />Another comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I feel at ease.//</span><br />It&#039;s a more engaging read when you give me the symptoms instead of the diagnosis. Describe what effect being at ease has on her and let me conclude how she feels. You might want to have a look at the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I usually use my magic, I’m very good at it; although it feels nice, opening a door on my own.//</span><br />The first comma is a splice, and the semicolon is misused—there isn&#039;t an independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can see the cracks on the sidewalk and the ants that live there//</span><br />Ants out on a sidewalk wet enough that it&#039;s splashing on her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Why would someone pick a favorite color?</i> I had asked him. <i>Is there any point to it? A color is a color, what makes one a favorite?</i>//</span><br />Why are you punctuating dialogue like thoughts?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even when they’re young//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dancing the ever waltz//</span><br />Missing a word there? Something like &quot;ever-present&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How instinctual could it have become, now, that we are born to exemplify the very rules we as children set out to protest, just in our own right?//</span><br />That second comma can go. However, the main thing here is that the narrative voice is wavering between simple, dazed-sounding speech and philosophical posturing. From what I know of her situation so far, it&#039;s not impossible that her mind is actually oscillating like this, but aside from the narration itself, there&#039;s nothing to indicate why. There&#039;s no emotional attachment to what she&#039;s saying that seems to drive her mood in these directions. It&#039;s like riding in a car blindfolded. You feel the turns, but you don&#039;t know why you&#039;re turning and can&#039;t anticipate them. You can get some leeway for this, but at some point, you have to provide some motivation, or it just feels directionless. We&#039;ll see how far you take it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;had ran//</span><br />had run<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It is as if to say that only when frozen, only when tested past the capacity of its endurance does something become one with that which is around it, and even then that bond can be shattered thoughtlessly by the smallest, most insignificant force.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;test&quot; from the previous sentence. I&#039;m also not following your metaphor here. It took a pretty big force to crack the frozen dirt. Frozen soil is stronger, after all, but then you go on the call that strength insignificant. And how is that cracked soil &quot;becoming one with that which is around it&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something as minuscule as a rabbit’s paw can still shatter it into a million pieces.//</span><br />A rabbit&#039;s paw isn&#039;t going to do much to soil unless it&#039;s extremely loose or wet. It won&#039;t do <i>anything</i> to frozen soil. None of this is ringing true. You don&#039;t want your story&#039;s primary emotional thread sounding like psychobabble.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There would be time, endless time, such an amount of time that the greatest mathematicians of our world would find it incalculable, only frustrating.//</span><br />Mathematicians are specially equipped to deal with concepts of infinity. You keep sacrificing meaning for poetic gradiloquence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The streets around me appear empty//</span><br />&quot;Appear&quot; wouldn&#039;t enter into it. She has an unobstructed view of them. She&#039;d know explicitly whether they were empty.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her body is covered by a light brown jacket, a compliment to the stetson hat and red scarf she wears.//</span><br />&quot;Stetson&quot; is a proper noun (and, incidentally, not really what she wears, but so many authors use it that I can let it slide). And you&#039;ve confused &quot;compliment&quot; with &quot;complement.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her blonde mane runs freely down her neck, lacking in the usual red bands that would hold her ponytail together.//</span><br />I&#039;ve noticed several of these misplaced modifiers. Participles are common for them. By proximity, it sounds like her neck is lacking in the usual red bands.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You must be”—she bites her lip and pulls her scarf tighter—“freezing, Twi’.//</span><br />&quot;Twi&quot; is just a nickname. You don&#039;t need the apostrophe. Also, presuming that biting her lip necessitates a momentary stop in her speech, put the dashes inside the quotes to indicate that pause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her concern is more than obvious, she isn’t attempting to hide it.//</span><br />So what does this look like?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Am I so important as to inflict pain upon someone else just temporarily relieve my own?//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for awhile//</span><br />&quot;A while&quot; and &quot;awhile&quot; are interchangeable in some respects, but not when you need a noun. Here, &quot;for&quot; requires an object, so it should be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;happily sipping their hot chocolate as they sit and talk about nothing but their favorite colors.//</span><br />This also feels incredibly inconsistent. Maybe it&#039;s only Twilight&#039;s perception of what&#039;s going on inside, but she just spent a while going on about Applejack&#039;s depth and sincerity, then in her next breath she&#039;s condemning her as just another shallow reveler? If you tried to build up AJ as a character, you just tore her back down.<br /><br />The only consistent mechanical thing I saw was comma splices, so pretty good on that front.<br /><br />Stylistically, this is full of narrative whiplash. Twilight&#039;s in a daze one moment and then waxing poetic in the next without any reason for the change. Applejack&#039;s a deep thinker and treasured friend one moment and a superficial partygoer the next. And too many of the metaphors are built up with fancy verbiage to obscure their nonsensical meanings. I&#039;ll also point out the sheer number of colons and semicolons. There are 24 in only 2600 words. You don&#039;t want a writing tic like this drawing attention to itself, to where the reader notices things about the writing itself. It breaks immersion.<br /><br />Plot-wise, nothing happens. The only thing that can be called a conflict is Twilight&#039;s decision whether to tell Applejack what&#039;s troubling her, but that comes and goes in less than a page. We never get the first inkling of what Twilight&#039;s problem is, and nobody does anything about it. Twilight doesn&#039;t undergo any character growth as a result. You have a scene here, but not a story. What changed? What was at stake? What goal did anyone have? What bad thing would have happened if that goal weren&#039;t achieved? I&#039;ve seen you make that exact criticism of a story before.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 71

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>So I’m Vinyl Scratch, and I have to write this stupid book so Octy can chill a bit, but actually-//

This format is going to be troublesome to critique. It's got plenty of mechanical errors so far, but as it's meant to be something that Vinyl wrote, would it represent the same kinds of mistakes she'd make? Quite possibly. Except that I doubt they were intentional, at least the majority of them. I'm actually impressed that you've avoided one of the biggest traps with diary stories so far, at least until now. Being cut off like this is a speech affectation. When you write, it's a slow enough process that you have time to plane out what you want to say. You wouldn't have an abrupt change of direction like this. It needs to sound like something she'd actually write in a diary, not something she'd say out loud.

>I’m a DJ, and I love my job.//

Needs a line break here.

>I love handing some autographs to my fans//

And what is this "hand" you speak of?

>against all whining of my parents and the raised forefinger//

Missing a word, and "forefinger"? You haven't marked this as a human story, so I'm not sure what to think here.

>going down to snack something//

Missing word.

>Wub-’n-Classic//

Needs another apostrophe after the n.

>Scratch!’,//

Doubled-up punctuation.

>‘round//

Smart quotes routinely fail on leading apostrophes. This one's backward.

>records to spin ‘n cake to eat//

Same deal with this contraction as before, but this comes across as more of a speech affectation again. Would she really choose to write that instead of spelling out "and"? I doubt it.

>3am//

You've been putting a space in there.

>Christmas//

"Hearth's Warming" in canon, yes?

>you’- look//

You don't need the hyphen. The quotes already group the compound modifier.

>(of course nothing like that ever happened to me, as I’m pretty awesome and stuff)//

Implying that being awesome prevents rape? I… I don't even know where to start with this.

>So ehm//

>Mh//
Again, these are speech affectations.

>See- ehm//

Please use a proper dash.

>Duuude//

Same deal. You talk like that, but you don't write like that.

>Being in the club all night isn’t new to me, but usually I stay sober during my performance, don’t want to fuck up all this awesome music, y’know?//

Okay, watch the language. There's only so much we're willing to take. But here's another trap writers fall into when doing diary formats: You're including quoted speech. In a letter or diary entry, you'd summarize what was said, not quote it. It's the little things like this that make it sound unconvincing as an actual diary.

>DJ P0N-3//

You're not always consistent in how you capitalize this.

>Wanna hear about that last time? Alright then.//

This is just immersion-breaking. Who's she talking to? And what's her motivation to write this now? She clearly remembers it well—it's not like she'll forget if she doesn't get it down. There are certain difficulties that come with choosing a diary format, and you can't just gloss them over or slap "this is a diary" on a standard narrative and think it will work.

>’What?//

This quotation mark is backward.

>somepony knocked our door//

Another missing word.

>Yet.//

This doesn't make sense, given the phrasing that came before.

>Wouldn’t had been//

have

>Octy came up to ask me if I could lower the volume//

Yeah… you just said so.

>came back to live//

life

>putted//

put

>But there are also some good news today.//

Subject/verb number agreement.

>tick//

The term you want is "tic." Again, Vinyl may not know that, but at some point, you're making the story hard to understand in the name of character. And that's giving you a big benefit of the doubt that this was intentional.

>The Great and Powerful Trixie//

What makes her a VIP?

>Cya//

You're inconsistent about putting line breaks with this at the ends of your chapters.

>she finally got herself into those ponies minds//

Missing apostrophe.

>Ruben was send//

sent

>I hurts//

Subject/verb agreement.

>If I just break contact to Ruben//

Phrasing. There are a lot of these little problems the further I go. It's like you didn't edit the later chapters as well.

>I woke up slowly.//

And you're not writing a diary anymore? It's a really rough transition when a story adopts a storytelling method for many chapters, then abruptly changes it later. I mean, I get why you did it, but that doesn't help smooth things out. If you'd had it as a regular narrative all along where she writes her entries at the end of each chapter, it would be more consistent.

>I started to squirm. Is this the end?//

This is the first break we've had in paragraph after paragraph of nothing but speech. Look at the section on talking heads at the top of this thread. After the first sentence here, the change in tense marks a change from narration to thought. You need to consider more carefully how you're doing this, whether you need to italicize the thought or reword things to keep the tense consistent.

>You wasn’t//

C'mon…

>they seemed to be involved into this//

Phrasing, but… where is she getting this? I've read the entries, and I'm not getting that impression.

>Smack//

Sound effects in narration aren't the best idea.

Aside from the mechanical issues, which I can't even tell how many are on purpose, We have the whiplash of storytelling method, talking heads, and a plot that's so out of left field that I didn't know whether to take it seriously. The editing got worse as I went on, and I'm more convinced that Vinyl's mistakes are more oversight than intention now.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So I’m Vinyl Scratch, and I have to write this stupid book so Octy can chill a bit, but actually-//</span><br />This format is going to be troublesome to critique. It&#039;s got plenty of mechanical errors so far, but as it&#039;s meant to be something that Vinyl wrote, would it represent the same kinds of mistakes she&#039;d make? Quite possibly. Except that I doubt they were intentional, at least the majority of them. I&#039;m actually impressed that you&#039;ve avoided one of the biggest traps with diary stories so far, at least until now. Being cut off like this is a speech affectation. When you write, it&#039;s a slow enough process that you have time to plane out what you want to say. You wouldn&#039;t have an abrupt change of direction like this. It needs to sound like something she&#039;d actually write in a diary, not something she&#039;d say out loud.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m a DJ, and I love my job.//</span><br />Needs a line break here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I love handing some autographs to my fans//</span><br />And what is this &quot;hand&quot; you speak of?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;against all whining of my parents and the raised forefinger//</span><br />Missing a word, and &quot;forefinger&quot;? You haven&#039;t marked this as a human story, so I&#039;m not sure what to think here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;going down to snack something//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wub-’n-Classic//</span><br />Needs another apostrophe after the n.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scratch!’,//</span><br />Doubled-up punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘round//</span><br />Smart quotes routinely fail on leading apostrophes. This one&#039;s backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;records to spin ‘n cake to eat//</span><br />Same deal with this contraction as before, but this comes across as more of a speech affectation again. Would she really choose to write that instead of spelling out &quot;and&quot;? I doubt it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;3am//</span><br />You&#039;ve been putting a space in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Christmas//</span><br />&quot;Hearth&#039;s Warming&quot; in canon, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you’- look//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the hyphen. The quotes already group the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(of course nothing like that ever happened to me, as I’m pretty awesome and stuff)//</span><br />Implying that being awesome prevents rape? I… I don&#039;t even know where to start with this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So ehm//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mh//</span><br />Again, these are speech affectations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;See- ehm//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Duuude//</span><br />Same deal. You talk like that, but you don&#039;t write like that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Being in the club all night isn’t new to me, but usually I stay sober during my performance, don’t want to fuck up all this awesome music, y’know?//</span><br />Okay, watch the language. There&#039;s only so much we&#039;re willing to take. But here&#039;s another trap writers fall into when doing diary formats: You&#039;re including quoted speech. In a letter or diary entry, you&#039;d summarize what was said, not quote it. It&#039;s the little things like this that make it sound unconvincing as an actual diary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;DJ P0N-3//</span><br />You&#039;re not always consistent in how you capitalize this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wanna hear about that last time? Alright then.//</span><br />This is just immersion-breaking. Who&#039;s she talking to? And what&#039;s her motivation to write this now? She clearly remembers it well—it&#039;s not like she&#039;ll forget if she doesn&#039;t get it down. There are certain difficulties that come with choosing a diary format, and you can&#039;t just gloss them over or slap &quot;this is a diary&quot; on a standard narrative and think it will work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;’What?//</span><br />This quotation mark is backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;somepony knocked our door//</span><br />Another missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yet.//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t make sense, given the phrasing that came before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wouldn’t had been//</span><br />have<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octy came up to ask me if I could lower the volume//</span><br />Yeah… you just said so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;came back to live//</span><br />life<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;putted//</span><br />put<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But there are also some good news today.//</span><br />Subject/verb number agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tick//</span><br />The term you want is &quot;tic.&quot; Again, Vinyl may not know that, but at some point, you&#039;re making the story hard to understand in the name of character. And that&#039;s giving you a big benefit of the doubt that this was intentional.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Great and Powerful Trixie//</span><br />What makes her a VIP?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cya//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent about putting line breaks with this at the ends of your chapters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she finally got herself into those ponies minds//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ruben was send//</span><br />sent<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hurts//</span><br />Subject/verb agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I just break contact to Ruben//</span><br />Phrasing. There are a lot of these little problems the further I go. It&#039;s like you didn&#039;t edit the later chapters as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I woke up slowly.//</span><br />And you&#039;re not writing a diary anymore? It&#039;s a really rough transition when a story adopts a storytelling method for many chapters, then abruptly changes it later. I mean, I get why you did it, but that doesn&#039;t help smooth things out. If you&#039;d had it as a regular narrative all along where she writes her entries at the end of each chapter, it would be more consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I started to squirm. Is this the end?//</span><br />This is the first break we&#039;ve had in paragraph after paragraph of nothing but speech. Look at the section on talking heads at the top of this thread. After the first sentence here, the change in tense marks a change from narration to thought. You need to consider more carefully how you&#039;re doing this, whether you need to italicize the thought or reword things to keep the tense consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You wasn’t//</span><br />C&#039;mon…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they seemed to be involved into this//</span><br />Phrasing, but… where is she getting this? I&#039;ve read the entries, and I&#039;m not getting that impression.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Smack//</span><br />Sound effects in narration aren&#039;t the best idea.<br /><br />Aside from the mechanical issues, which I can&#039;t even tell how many are on purpose, We have the whiplash of storytelling method, talking heads, and a plot that&#039;s so out of left field that I didn&#039;t know whether to take it seriously. The editing got worse as I went on, and I&#039;m more convinced that Vinyl&#039;s mistakes are more oversight than intention now.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 72

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>and took position//

Missing word.

>After she landed, Celestia//

First, it's ambiguous whether you mean Celestia landed or Twilight did. Plus you already mentioned that Twilight landed.

>…and//

Going without capitalization is for sentences that pick up where previous ones leave off. Since there is no previous sentence, capitalize this.

>He merely dismissed the notion that the list was incomplete, or otherwise had errors.//

See the section on head-hopping at the top of this thread. You've been in Twilight's head, and I don't see a reason to transfer into Spike's perspective like this.

>She was annoyed//

And check out the section on "show versus tell," too. It's better to lead me to this conclusion through evidence you present instead of telling me her mood directly.

>She now felt silly that she has neglected such a simple thing, and was glad Spike was sleeping and couldn't see her mistake.//

Verb form. Also check out the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>who awoke with a groan//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>Twilight was surprised at this.//

Beware using demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns. They have vague, broad antecedents that refer to the narration itself. Fortunately, the fix is easy: find an appropriate noun to put after it.

>exotic looking//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors.

>Princess Twilight;//

Misused semicolon. There is no independent clause before it.

>massively racist policies//

Agreed. Where is this coming from? There's no indication of such in canon, so it's rather abrupt to jump straight to it. You need to connect the dots.

>A single tear rolled down her cheek.//

This is incredibly cliched. If she cries, just have her cry.

>Celestia looked at Twilight with a look of worry.//

Besides being telly, she just did this a few paragraphs ago.

>" Well//

Extraneous space.

>turn me back into a unicorn.//

Missing closing quotation marks.

The few emotions you do get across are done in a telly manner, but there's really not that much emotional content to begin with. The narration focuses too much on what happens at the expense of how anyone feels about those events. It reads more like a historical record, not a narrative. And this is a huge decision Twilight is making, yet he makes a snap judgment. She's going to give up being a princess after one day, and Celestia is so willing to indulge her? She's not even portrayed as that emotional about it, more bored and frustrated than anything, even where paperwork would seem to be up her alley, getting everything documented and squared away. It's just all to detached from the character to draw the reader into it and make him feel bad for Twilight, and her decision is made and supported much too lightly.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and took position//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After she landed, Celestia//</span><br />First, it&#039;s ambiguous whether you mean Celestia landed or Twilight did. Plus you already mentioned that Twilight landed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…and//</span><br />Going without capitalization is for sentences that pick up where previous ones leave off. Since there is no previous sentence, capitalize this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He merely dismissed the notion that the list was incomplete, or otherwise had errors.//</span><br />See the section on head-hopping at the top of this thread. You&#039;ve been in Twilight&#039;s head, and I don&#039;t see a reason to transfer into Spike&#039;s perspective like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was annoyed//</span><br />And check out the section on &quot;show versus tell,&quot; too. It&#039;s better to lead me to this conclusion through evidence you present instead of telling me her mood directly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She now felt silly that she has neglected such a simple thing, and was glad Spike was sleeping and couldn&#039;t see her mistake.//</span><br />Verb form. Also check out the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who awoke with a groan//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was surprised at this.//</span><br />Beware using demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns. They have vague, broad antecedents that refer to the narration itself. Fortunately, the fix is easy: find an appropriate noun to put after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;exotic looking//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Twilight;//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There is no independent clause before it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;massively racist policies//</span><br />Agreed. Where is this coming from? There&#039;s no indication of such in canon, so it&#039;s rather abrupt to jump straight to it. You need to connect the dots.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A single tear rolled down her cheek.//</span><br />This is incredibly cliched. If she cries, just have her cry.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia looked at Twilight with a look of worry.//</span><br />Besides being telly, she just did this a few paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot; Well//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;turn me back into a unicorn.//</span><br />Missing closing quotation marks.<br /><br />The few emotions you do get across are done in a telly manner, but there&#039;s really not that much emotional content to begin with. The narration focuses too much on what happens at the expense of how anyone feels about those events. It reads more like a historical record, not a narrative. And this is a huge decision Twilight is making, yet he makes a snap judgment. She&#039;s going to give up being a princess after one day, and Celestia is so willing to indulge her? She&#039;s not even portrayed as that emotional about it, more bored and frustrated than anything, even where paperwork would seem to be up her alley, getting everything documented and squared away. It&#039;s just all to detached from the character to draw the reader into it and make him feel bad for Twilight, and her decision is made and supported much too lightly.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 73

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>The only one who came to her birthday was herself.//
That's not how reflexive pronouns work. She'd need to be the subject as well. Grammatically speaking, the "herself" should be "she." You could actually put "she herself" or "Pinkie herself" there.

Story:
Your opening paragraph presents the entire emotional context to set up your story. But you present it all so factually and quickly that it doesn't sink in or leave much of an impression on the reader. And unfortunately, you're not going to be able to do that quickly. People grow apart. It happens. I'm not going to feel sorry for Pinkie unless I know how losing these particular friends makes her feel, so that I feel it along with her. At least you don't have to start from ground zero. Canon already establishes that they're good friends, so that's a given. But you do need to present these in such a way that it fills in more of the backstory and shows me the pain instead of summing it all up for me. You do a little of that with Rarity in particular, so that's a step in the right direction.

>between she and the twins- but even that felt more like a business partnership//

Please use a proper dash. And as the object of a preposition, you need "her," not "she."

>Ponyville didn't feel like home anymore. Nowhere that she could, and did eventually visit, did anymore. Every morning when she woke, she told herself; "Today will be better. Today ponies will love me again. Today my friends will remember me."//

If we're to believe "Magical Mystery Cure," the town doesn't function without her. And she considers everyone a friend. This might take some more justification to connect the dots from canon.

>Dasha//

Huh?

>The years had treated her well, it seemed she hadn't aged a day since that last spat//

Comma splice.

>“Well yeah. But you’re close. Just come with us, Pinkie, I thought you were our friend?”//

Looks like you're missing a line break there, the last comma is a splice, and that's not really a question.

>She plastered on a fake smile as she sat at her little desk, beginning to slowly and painfully brush out her straightened mane.//

Watch placement of participles. They often make for misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the desk is beginning to brush her mane.

>Heh, that was a funny word, accrued.//

You're making the character aware of a third-person narration. Bad, bad idea.

> She grabbed down a towel and finished drying herself, pulling a brush onto her hoof and running the stiff bristles through her mane to finish straightening and neatening it.//

Watch the word repetition in a close space, as in the "finish" here.

>maw//

Inasmuch as you're trying to adopt a subjective viewpoint, it would behoove you to use language you could imagine the character using, even if you don't actually adopt her voice. This just doesn't ring true as a word Pinkie would ever use.

>Immediately she moved for the kitchen and started a pot of coffee, cooking herself a fried egg inside a piece of toast for breakfast while she waited on the pot.//

Another thing to note about participles: they imply concurrent action. So she's starting a pot of coffee, cooking the egg, and waiting on the coffee all at the same time.

Your left margin is uneven. I suspect you're using a set number of spaces for indentation. FiMFiction will stretch that and distort it. You'll need to replace those indentations with tabs.

>Pinkie sighed deeply, and returned to her meal.//

Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>You never really got used to Pinkie's melancholy, you just.. made room for it.//

Ellipsis is missing a dot. It's really odd to address the reader when the narrator hasn't been making a point of it, and in this case, seems to have leapt into Pumpkin and Pound's perspective, even though they're not there.

>Dutifully, the twins marched along behind her to school//

If Pinkie's 40, that makes the twins what, 15 or 20 at least? They still need to be walked to school?

>She smiles, yes, that would be nice.//

Verb tense, and why are you going from an objective to a subjective viewpoint in the same sentence?

>an empty amber bottle marked with a label in uncomprehensible Equestrian lays on its side on the floor.//

Lay/lie confusion. incomprehensible

>She rolled onto her side//

You've begun the last four paragraphs with the same word. Mix it up.

>"Drop!".//

You don't need to double up on the end punctuation.

>Pinkie knew where she was being lead now.//

led

>The curly-maned mare snorted and pawed//

You already had her do that half a page ago, almost word for word.

>Earth pony//

"Earth" would not be capitalized in this sense.

And now that I'm finished reading, I see that the bulk of the points I've made or planned to make in summary down here have already been noted in the WRITE review posted in the story's comments. I have to say, I agree with most of what's there, but there are two in particular that I want to emphasize.

This story hinges on the reader feeling Pinkie's utter hopelessness and pain. The source of that hopelessness and pain is her distance from her friends, which we are only ever told about in narrative summary. All of that backstory needs much more detail to seem real and to bring the reader's emotions to bear.

And suicide is a very serious theme to undertake, particularly in this fandom. As such, Equestria Daily tends to stay away from such stories unless they are exceptionally good and give the subject the appropriate gravity without glorifying suicide in any way. While I can' accuse you of the last one of those, since I can't even tell whether Pinkie actually killed herself and came to some sort of peace with some of her alter egos in a sort of afterlife or found the strength to go on living with those same alter egos as support. In any case, it still needs to stand head and shoulders above the piles of other suicide stories, and it just doesn't.

And a further word about repetition—I encountered a lot of "to be" verbs, over 60 across both chapters. That's a lot for a story this short. They're boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read action verbs. I bet you could weed out a bunch of these.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The only one who came to her birthday was herself.//</span><br />That&#039;s not how reflexive pronouns work. She&#039;d need to be the subject as well. Grammatically speaking, the &quot;herself&quot; should be &quot;she.&quot; You could actually put &quot;she herself&quot; or &quot;Pinkie herself&quot; there.<br /><br />Story:<br />Your opening paragraph presents the entire emotional context to set up your story. But you present it all so factually and quickly that it doesn&#039;t sink in or leave much of an impression on the reader. And unfortunately, you&#039;re not going to be able to do that quickly. People grow apart. It happens. I&#039;m not going to feel sorry for Pinkie unless I know how losing these particular friends makes her feel, so that I feel it along with her. At least you don&#039;t have to start from ground zero. Canon already establishes that they&#039;re good friends, so that&#039;s a given. But you do need to present these in such a way that it fills in more of the backstory and shows me the pain instead of summing it all up for me. You do a little of that with Rarity in particular, so that&#039;s a step in the right direction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;between she and the twins- but even that felt more like a business partnership//</span><br />Please use a proper dash. And as the object of a preposition, you need &quot;her,&quot; not &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville didn&#039;t feel like home anymore. Nowhere that she could, and did eventually visit, did anymore. Every morning when she woke, she told herself; &quot;Today will be better. Today ponies will love me again. Today my friends will remember me.&quot;//</span><br />If we&#039;re to believe &quot;Magical Mystery Cure,&quot; the town doesn&#039;t function without her. And she considers everyone a friend. This might take some more justification to connect the dots from canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dasha//</span><br />Huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The years had treated her well, it seemed she hadn&#039;t aged a day since that last spat//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Well yeah. But you’re close. Just come with us, Pinkie, I thought you were our friend?”//</span><br />Looks like you&#039;re missing a line break there, the last comma is a splice, and that&#039;s not really a question.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She plastered on a fake smile as she sat at her little desk, beginning to slowly and painfully brush out her straightened mane.//</span><br />Watch placement of participles. They often make for misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the desk is beginning to brush her mane.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Heh, that was a funny word, accrued.//</span><br />You&#039;re making the character aware of a third-person narration. Bad, bad idea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; She grabbed down a towel and finished drying herself, pulling a brush onto her hoof and running the stiff bristles through her mane to finish straightening and neatening it.//</span><br />Watch the word repetition in a close space, as in the &quot;finish&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;maw//</span><br />Inasmuch as you&#039;re trying to adopt a subjective viewpoint, it would behoove you to use language you could imagine the character using, even if you don&#039;t actually adopt her voice. This just doesn&#039;t ring true as a word Pinkie would ever use.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Immediately she moved for the kitchen and started a pot of coffee, cooking herself a fried egg inside a piece of toast for breakfast while she waited on the pot.//</span><br />Another thing to note about participles: they imply concurrent action. So she&#039;s starting a pot of coffee, cooking the egg, and waiting on the coffee all at the same time.<br /><br />Your left margin is uneven. I suspect you&#039;re using a set number of spaces for indentation. FiMFiction will stretch that and distort it. You&#039;ll need to replace those indentations with tabs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie sighed deeply, and returned to her meal.//</span><br />Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You never really got used to Pinkie&#039;s melancholy, you just.. made room for it.//</span><br />Ellipsis is missing a dot. It&#039;s really odd to address the reader when the narrator hasn&#039;t been making a point of it, and in this case, seems to have leapt into Pumpkin and Pound&#039;s perspective, even though they&#039;re not there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dutifully, the twins marched along behind her to school//</span><br />If Pinkie&#039;s 40, that makes the twins what, 15 or 20 at least? They still need to be walked to school?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smiles, yes, that would be nice.//</span><br />Verb tense, and why are you going from an objective to a subjective viewpoint in the same sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an empty amber bottle marked with a label in uncomprehensible Equestrian lays on its side on the floor.//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. incomprehensible<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She rolled onto her side//</span><br />You&#039;ve begun the last four paragraphs with the same word. Mix it up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Drop!&quot;.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to double up on the end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie knew where she was being lead now.//</span><br />led<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The curly-maned mare snorted and pawed//</span><br />You already had her do that half a page ago, almost word for word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Earth pony//</span><br />&quot;Earth&quot; would not be capitalized in this sense.<br /><br />And now that I&#039;m finished reading, I see that the bulk of the points I&#039;ve made or planned to make in summary down here have already been noted in the WRITE review posted in the story&#039;s comments. I have to say, I agree with most of what&#039;s there, but there are two in particular that I want to emphasize.<br /><br />This story hinges on the reader feeling Pinkie&#039;s utter hopelessness and pain. The source of that hopelessness and pain is her distance from her friends, which we are only ever told about in narrative summary. All of that backstory needs much more detail to seem real and to bring the reader&#039;s emotions to bear.<br /><br />And suicide is a very serious theme to undertake, particularly in this fandom. As such, Equestria Daily tends to stay away from such stories unless they are exceptionally good and give the subject the appropriate gravity without glorifying suicide in any way. While I can&#039; accuse you of the last one of those, since I can&#039;t even tell whether Pinkie actually killed herself and came to some sort of peace with some of her alter egos in a sort of afterlife or found the strength to go on living with those same alter egos as support. In any case, it still needs to stand head and shoulders above the piles of other suicide stories, and it just doesn&#039;t.<br /><br />And a further word about repetition—I encountered a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs, over 60 across both chapters. That&#039;s a lot for a story this short. They&#039;re boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read action verbs. I bet you could weed out a bunch of these.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 74

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'd recommend cutting the second paragraph of your synopsis. It's not the kind of thing that's enticing, and it really tells us nothing about the story.

>This time Rarity’s face was tear-streaked, her eyes filled with a primal rage, her knees shaking and about the give out from despair, even her mane and tail were starting to show signs of neglect.//

This sentence is much better than the "pool of emotions" stated in the first one, in that it gives me the symptoms of how she feels and lets me draw the conclusions, except for that "despair" part. This is especially important right at the beginning of the story, where you're trying to forge an immediate connection between the character and the reader. You might want to look at the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. The second comma here is a splice, and you have a typo in there.

>a string of desperate false confessions, the misunderstanding and subsequent battle between three local waiters and her old compatriot Tempeh//

Since I have zero idea what any of this is, it's not going to carry any weight in trying to make her situation sympathetic to me.

>She was basically eternally single now.//

I get that she's prone to exaggeration, but this is coming out of nowhere. Her thoughts hadn't been running toward failure at romance, and yet that's what this all led to.

>THAT//

Italics are preferred for emphasis.

Okay, the bit in italics… The colored text isn't helping you. It's not immediately evident what the significance is, and when the reader has to go back over it to figure it out, that's a bad thing. It's also a fairly lazy way of getting at her mindset without actually describing it.

>so she wouldn’t be stopping in unexpectedly//

Set this dependent clause off with a comma. You'd normally do that anyway, but without one here, it sounds like you're giving Sweetie Belle's motivation for being away.

>tantrum//

You're telling me she's having a tantrum, but I don't really get to see it.

>(s)//

All these parentheticals are getting to be a bit much. I'll give you some leeway, since it's a very subjective narrator, but you don't want tics drawing attention to the writing itself and away from the story.

>“ –‘and//

Capitalize, since this isn't continuing a sentence begun earlier. You also have an extraneous space in there. An ellipsis would be more appropriate than a dash, since the speech isn't breaking in; we're just gradually becoming aware of it.

>Ya’ll//

Why can't anyone spell this right?

Your Applejack accent is a bit much. Readers will mostly fill it in for you. You don' have to resort to so many imitative spellings like "tha" and "ta."

>It was really…” she paused, searching for the best word, yet ending flatly with, "…weird."//

Here's how to work an aside into a quote:
It was really—” she paused, searching for the best word, yet ending flatly with "—weird."
Note you also have a mix of simple and fancier quotation marks.

>She felt the need to emphasize Rarity's genuine wishes that the note contained. Ensure her friends understood and would permit her to try this.//

The first sentence is pretty meaningless, and the second just plain doesn't parse.

>If- no//

Please use a proper dash.

>iffn//

if'm

>Each exchanged looks, and turned to leave with short parting words.//

Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>*ahem*//

No. Sound effects in narration are bad enough, but you've crossed the line into a first person narration by doing this.

>And failures//

Why in the world is this in a bigger font?

>she laid on her back on her sheets, staring and wondering//

Lay/lie confusion. Also note that participles can easily be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the sheets are staring and wondering.

>calling her nutty//

This is also coming out of nowhere. We haven't seen any of this happen. Maybe it's only in her mind, but we haven't seen her impression of it happening, either. That's one of the biggest problems with this story: it expects us to take things that are scarcely mentioned, and then make an emotional investment in them so that Rarity's situation makes perfect sense and we care about her.

>knowing internally//

As opposed to?

>They can't grasp my pain//

And herein lies the problem. I can't either. I'm seeing little evidence of it. All I have is her vague statements and some telly language that shortcuts the emotional discovery process and feeds me the conclusions.

>That sullen sorrow turned to annoyance and indignation.//

…And here's a prime example of it.

>A cover to save himself from my love expressed!//

And this is a common problem with shipping stories. You've just stated that she was attracted to him, and I'm supposed to just accept that and care about it. I have no evidence of how much she cares for him or what sort of chemistry they have together. I can't tell whether this is some years-long thing that's devastating her or a momentary infatuation that she's exaggerating. All I know is that the narrator says she likes him, and I supposed to develop some attachment to the idea. It doesn't work that way. Don't assume I'll care. You have to make me care.

>heart!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>She paused, her glaze trailing along the floor.//

Either that's a typo, or there are some very disturbing implications that make this story unsuitable for Equestria Daily…

>The mixes had slowly returned more reasoned and calm than before//

Mixes? I can't figure out what you mean.

>look could look//

Watch the repetition.

>"Though…,"//

You don't use the comma when there's some other kind of end punctuation there..

>Elsewhere, a pink pony suddenly sneezed colorful confetti out her ears.//

I have no reference as to what this is supposed to mean. Pinkie Sense? Just a random comment?

>Her surveyal//

survey

>this love and relations headaches//

Hyphenate your compound modifier, and you have a number agreement problem (this… headaches).

Okay, I'm at day nine now, and I have to wonder what happened to Opal. She's surely back from the groomer, and in canon, Rarity uses her as a sounding board. Why wouldn't she be there?

>She cut herself short//

You don't need to say what the punctuation already does.

>get~!//

~ is not punctuation. If you mean she's trilling or singing the word, then say so.

>If I knew here was the best entertainer in town//

Phrasing.

>Here in front of her was one who would never judge her//

Except that she has been judging her all week…

I've said it already, but I'll say it again: The biggest issue in this story is a decided lack of emotional investment. We're given a very vague idea as to what put her in this funk in the first place, so that leaves it all feeling very external to me. What emotional context we get from Rarity herself is biased heavily toward telly language, which again just leaves everything external. You're asking me to come up with the buy-in, but that's your job. It might have been more effective to throw out the whole bit with Fancy Pants and leave it as some generic thing that's shaken her self-esteem. Then there's not so much of an impetus to want that back story explained.

The resolution is fairly weak. Essentially, she's trading one mental calamity for another and hasn't addressed the core problem, but I'm not prepared to say that's a deal-breaking choice. While it means I personally found the ending unsatisfying, I can't call it that in an objective sense.

So where were Rarity's friends? They express all this concern for her, and while I can appreciate that they'd give her space if she needed it, they'd at least check in without being intrusive. And while it's possible that happened off camera, it would be completely on me to invent it. It just seems odd to give them a role in the story at all and then do nothing with them.

On a note about repetition, you have well over 150 "to be" verbs in your story. That's a ton for one of this length. While I can understand that you'd have more in dialogue and a narration that tends toward a dialogue feel, but I bet you could reduce that quite a bit. It's an inherently boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is.

I will say that you have a nice touch with Rarity's voice. Her conversations with the mirror seemed nicely in character, and while the slower, introspective nature of the story may well be pretty hit-or-miss with readers or even what particular mood they're in at the time, I enjoyed watching her progression.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />I&#039;d recommend cutting the second paragraph of your synopsis. It&#039;s not the kind of thing that&#039;s enticing, and it really tells us nothing about the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This time Rarity’s face was tear-streaked, her eyes filled with a primal rage, her knees shaking and about the give out from despair, even her mane and tail were starting to show signs of neglect.//</span><br />This sentence is much better than the &quot;pool of emotions&quot; stated in the first one, in that it gives me the symptoms of how she feels and lets me draw the conclusions, except for that &quot;despair&quot; part. This is especially important right at the beginning of the story, where you&#039;re trying to forge an immediate connection between the character and the reader. You might want to look at the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread. The second comma here is a splice, and you have a typo in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a string of desperate false confessions, the misunderstanding and subsequent battle between three local waiters and her old compatriot Tempeh//</span><br />Since I have zero idea what any of this is, it&#039;s not going to carry any weight in trying to make her situation sympathetic to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was basically eternally single now.//</span><br />I get that she&#039;s prone to exaggeration, but this is coming out of nowhere. Her thoughts hadn&#039;t been running toward failure at romance, and yet that&#039;s what this all led to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;THAT//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br />Okay, the bit in italics… The colored text isn&#039;t helping you. It&#039;s not immediately evident what the significance is, and when the reader has to go back over it to figure it out, that&#039;s a bad thing. It&#039;s also a fairly lazy way of getting at her mindset without actually describing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so she wouldn’t be stopping in unexpectedly//</span><br />Set this dependent clause off with a comma. You&#039;d normally do that anyway, but without one here, it sounds like you&#039;re giving Sweetie Belle&#039;s motivation for being away.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tantrum//</span><br />You&#039;re telling me she&#039;s having a tantrum, but I don&#039;t really get to see it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(s)//</span><br />All these parentheticals are getting to be a bit much. I&#039;ll give you some leeway, since it&#039;s a very subjective narrator, but you don&#039;t want tics drawing attention to the writing itself and away from the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“ –‘and//</span><br />Capitalize, since this isn&#039;t continuing a sentence begun earlier. You also have an extraneous space in there. An ellipsis would be more appropriate than a dash, since the speech isn&#039;t breaking in; we&#039;re just gradually becoming aware of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ya’ll//</span><br />Why can&#039;t anyone spell this right?<br /><br />Your Applejack accent is a bit much. Readers will mostly fill it in for you. You don&#039; have to resort to so many imitative spellings like &quot;tha&quot; and &quot;ta.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was really…” she paused, searching for the best word, yet ending flatly with, &quot;…weird.&quot;//</span><br />Here&#039;s how to work an aside into a quote:<br />It was really—” she paused, searching for the best word, yet ending flatly with &quot;—weird.&quot;<br />Note you also have a mix of simple and fancier quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt the need to emphasize Rarity&#039;s genuine wishes that the note contained. Ensure her friends understood and would permit her to try this.//</span><br />The first sentence is pretty meaningless, and the second just plain doesn&#039;t parse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If- no//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;iffn//</span><br />if&#039;m<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Each exchanged looks, and turned to leave with short parting words.//</span><br />Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;*ahem*//</span><br />No. Sound effects in narration are bad enough, but you&#039;ve crossed the line into a first person narration by doing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And failures//</span><br />Why in the world is this in a bigger font?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she laid on her back on her sheets, staring and wondering//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. Also note that participles can easily be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the sheets are staring and wondering.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;calling her nutty//</span><br />This is also coming out of nowhere. We haven&#039;t seen any of this happen. Maybe it&#039;s only in her mind, but we haven&#039;t seen her impression of it happening, either. That&#039;s one of the biggest problems with this story: it expects us to take things that are scarcely mentioned, and then make an emotional investment in them so that Rarity&#039;s situation makes perfect sense and we care about her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knowing internally//</span><br />As opposed to?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They can&#039;t grasp my pain//</span><br />And herein lies the problem. I can&#039;t either. I&#039;m seeing little evidence of it. All I have is her vague statements and some telly language that shortcuts the emotional discovery process and feeds me the conclusions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That sullen sorrow turned to annoyance and indignation.//</span><br />…And here&#039;s a prime example of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A cover to save himself from my love expressed!//</span><br />And this is a common problem with shipping stories. You&#039;ve just stated that she was attracted to him, and I&#039;m supposed to just accept that and care about it. I have no evidence of how much she cares for him or what sort of chemistry they have together. I can&#039;t tell whether this is some years-long thing that&#039;s devastating her or a momentary infatuation that she&#039;s exaggerating. All I know is that the narrator says she likes him, and I supposed to develop some attachment to the idea. It doesn&#039;t work that way. Don&#039;t assume I&#039;ll care. You have to make me care.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;heart!!//</span><br />One exclamation mark is plenty.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She paused, her glaze trailing along the floor.//</span><br />Either that&#039;s a typo, or there are some very disturbing implications that make this story unsuitable for Equestria Daily…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mixes had slowly returned more reasoned and calm than before//</span><br />Mixes? I can&#039;t figure out what you mean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;look could look//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Though…,&quot;//</span><br />You don&#039;t use the comma when there&#039;s some other kind of end punctuation there..<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Elsewhere, a pink pony suddenly sneezed colorful confetti out her ears.//</span><br />I have no reference as to what this is supposed to mean. Pinkie Sense? Just a random comment?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her surveyal//</span><br />survey<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this love and relations headaches//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifier, and you have a number agreement problem (this… headaches).<br /><br />Okay, I&#039;m at day nine now, and I have to wonder what happened to Opal. She&#039;s surely back from the groomer, and in canon, Rarity uses her as a sounding board. Why wouldn&#039;t she be there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She cut herself short//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to say what the punctuation already does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;get~!//</span><br />~ is not punctuation. If you mean she&#039;s trilling or singing the word, then say so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I knew here was the best entertainer in town//</span><br />Phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Here in front of her was one who would never judge her//</span><br />Except that she has been judging her all week…<br /><br />I&#039;ve said it already, but I&#039;ll say it again: The biggest issue in this story is a decided lack of emotional investment. We&#039;re given a very vague idea as to what put her in this funk in the first place, so that leaves it all feeling very external to me. What emotional context we get from Rarity herself is biased heavily toward telly language, which again just leaves everything external. You&#039;re asking me to come up with the buy-in, but that&#039;s your job. It might have been more effective to throw out the whole bit with Fancy Pants and leave it as some generic thing that&#039;s shaken her self-esteem. Then there&#039;s not so much of an impetus to want that back story explained.<br /><br />The resolution is fairly weak. Essentially, she&#039;s trading one mental calamity for another and hasn&#039;t addressed the core problem, but I&#039;m not prepared to say that&#039;s a deal-breaking choice. While it means I personally found the ending unsatisfying, I can&#039;t call it that in an objective sense.<br /><br />So where were Rarity&#039;s friends? They express all this concern for her, and while I can appreciate that they&#039;d give her space if she needed it, they&#039;d at least check in without being intrusive. And while it&#039;s possible that happened off camera, it would be completely on me to invent it. It just seems odd to give them a role in the story at all and then do nothing with them.<br /><br />On a note about repetition, you have well over 150 &quot;to be&quot; verbs in your story. That&#039;s a ton for one of this length. While I can understand that you&#039;d have more in dialogue and a narration that tends toward a dialogue feel, but I bet you could reduce that quite a bit. It&#039;s an inherently boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is.<br /><br />I will say that you have a nice touch with Rarity&#039;s voice. Her conversations with the mirror seemed nicely in character, and while the slower, introspective nature of the story may well be pretty hit-or-miss with readers or even what particular mood they&#039;re in at the time, I enjoyed watching her progression.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 75

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>with my first salary//

That's just an odd phrasing. A salary is an ongoing thing, so technically she'd still be on her first salary. She's likely not salaried, though—I imagine her type of job would be an hourly wage. Bottom line: I think this would work better as "Paycheck," and I think that's closer to the meaning you were going for anyway.

>That and a few pieces of cakes//

While this could have a valid meaning as written, it's still just phrased oddly. Try just singular "cake."

>can you imagine two Pinkie’s running around the place?//

This shouldn't be a possessive. Lose the apostrophe.

>Like, twenty Pinkies!//

This begs the question of when you envision this story occurring. Given what happened in "Too Many Pinkie Pies," you may need to make it clear that this story predates that, or the reader is just going to wonder why that's conveniently slipped her mind. Edit: Now you've definitely got a problem. Gummy's definitely seen alive in canon after "TMPP," so she'd have already seen this exact scenario happen before.

>Like, twenty Pinkies!//

I'm only through two paragraphs, and already 8 of 14 sentences end in an exclamation mark. For one thing, readers already know Pinkie is excitable and will fill in a lot of that tone for you. For another, exclamation marks are meant to make things stand out, and when a lot of things stand out, it weakens them all. Consider the extreme: When everything stands out, nothing does.

>caught my eyes//

I've only ever seen this phrase in the singular: caught my eye.

>you already know his name by now//

This opens a can of worms. If your narrator isn't one that's going to address the reader regularly, it's best to avoid doing so altogether. The other issue is that by dragging me in as an effective character, you're courting the edge of needing to justify my presence there, as you would with any character. Why would I be there with her? Why does she want to tell me the story? Why do I want to listen? When you make me part of the story, you have to consider my motivations, too.

>It didn’t even hurt really. It was just gummy.//

It wouldn't have hurt, even if he had teeth. It's not like she can feel her tail.

>GUMMY!//

Italics are preferred over bold, underline, or all caps for emphasis (except in the specific instance of something in writing).

>Mister-Chomp-A-Lot//

That first hyphen can go. You don't say "Mister-Smith," do you?

>WHY WON’T YOU TALK TO ME GUMMY?//

Missing comma for direct address.

>What if Gummy was to die?//

This is an extremely odd disconnect that she'd independently conceive of this possibility. I could see her in denial that Gummy could ever die in the first place, but she's conceding that.

>ol//

Missing apostrophe.

So now that I'm at the end, I have to wonder why Gummy isn't starting to smell. There's a pretty big issue of being sanitary here that it's hard to believe everyone can just gloss over for her benefit.

There were the few odd editing issues that had me worried because they all cropped up near the beginning, but I was pleased to see the mechanics improve when I got further in. Still you don't want those being the first impression the reader gets, so fix those up.

There's a fine line here with Pinkie's friends trying to help her. Since it's from her perspective, I could believe that they'd tried a few times, but that it didn't even register with her. But she'd at least know what they said to her. And the bit about Twilight making Gummy move didn't really ring true. She's very down-to-earth and practical. She'd realize that wasn't really helping and again with being unsanitary. Particularly since there's strength in numbers, wouldn't her friends have made sure she understood, particularly with the emphasis they always place on friendship? It really makes the whole thing feel detached to me, like they don't care enough about her to use some tough love. Whether or not she actually gets the picture is another thing, but I think the story would be a lot stronger for making it clear that they were all doing their due diligence.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with my first salary//</span><br />That&#039;s just an odd phrasing. A salary is an ongoing thing, so technically she&#039;d still be on her first salary. She&#039;s likely not salaried, though—I imagine her type of job would be an hourly wage. Bottom line: I think this would work better as &quot;Paycheck,&quot; and I think that&#039;s closer to the meaning you were going for anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That and a few pieces of cakes//</span><br />While this could have a valid meaning as written, it&#039;s still just phrased oddly. Try just singular &quot;cake.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;can you imagine two Pinkie’s running around the place?//</span><br />This shouldn&#039;t be a possessive. Lose the apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Like, twenty Pinkies!//</span><br />This begs the question of when you envision this story occurring. Given what happened in &quot;Too Many Pinkie Pies,&quot; you may need to make it clear that this story predates that, or the reader is just going to wonder why that&#039;s conveniently slipped her mind. Edit: Now you&#039;ve definitely got a problem. Gummy&#039;s definitely seen alive in canon after &quot;<abbr title="Too Many Pinkie Pies">TMPP</abbr>,&quot; so she&#039;d have already seen this exact scenario happen before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Like, twenty Pinkies!//</span><br />I&#039;m only through two paragraphs, and already 8 of 14 sentences end in an exclamation mark. For one thing, readers already know Pinkie is excitable and will fill in a lot of that tone for you. For another, exclamation marks are meant to make things stand out, and when a lot of things stand out, it weakens them all. Consider the extreme: When everything stands out, nothing does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;caught my eyes//</span><br />I&#039;ve only ever seen this phrase in the singular: caught my eye.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you already know his name by now//</span><br />This opens a can of worms. If your narrator isn&#039;t one that&#039;s going to address the reader regularly, it&#039;s best to avoid doing so altogether. The other issue is that by dragging me in as an effective character, you&#039;re courting the edge of needing to justify my presence there, as you would with any character. Why would I be there with her? Why does she want to tell me the story? Why do I want to listen? When you make me part of the story, you have to consider my motivations, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It didn’t even hurt really. It was just gummy.//</span><br />It wouldn&#039;t have hurt, even if he had teeth. It&#039;s not like she can feel her tail.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;GUMMY!//</span><br />Italics are preferred over bold, underline, or all caps for emphasis (except in the specific instance of something in writing).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mister-Chomp-A-Lot//</span><br />That first hyphen can go. You don&#039;t say &quot;Mister-Smith,&quot; do you?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;WHY WON’T YOU TALK TO ME GUMMY?//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What if Gummy was to die?//</span><br />This is an extremely odd disconnect that she&#039;d independently conceive of this possibility. I could see her in denial that Gummy could ever die in the first place, but she&#039;s conceding that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ol//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br />So now that I&#039;m at the end, I have to wonder why Gummy isn&#039;t starting to smell. There&#039;s a pretty big issue of being sanitary here that it&#039;s hard to believe everyone can just gloss over for her benefit.<br /><br />There were the few odd editing issues that had me worried because they all cropped up near the beginning, but I was pleased to see the mechanics improve when I got further in. Still you don&#039;t want those being the first impression the reader gets, so fix those up.<br /><br />There&#039;s a fine line here with Pinkie&#039;s friends trying to help her. Since it&#039;s from her perspective, I could believe that they&#039;d tried a few times, but that it didn&#039;t even register with her. But she&#039;d at least know what they said to her. And the bit about Twilight making Gummy move didn&#039;t really ring true. She&#039;s very down-to-earth and practical. She&#039;d realize that wasn&#039;t really helping and again with being unsanitary. Particularly since there&#039;s strength in numbers, wouldn&#039;t her friends have made sure she understood, particularly with the emphasis they always place on friendship? It really makes the whole thing feel detached to me, like they don&#039;t care enough about her to use some tough love. Whether or not she actually gets the picture is another thing, but I think the story would be a lot stronger for making it clear that they were all doing their due diligence.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 76

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Berryshine is a pony with a history and a reputation, neither of which she is very proud of. However, a series of events forces her to re-examine her life.//

First, that's not a very enticing synopsis. You'd do better to play up the emotions surrounding this re-examining. Frankly, the same can be said of the title. Second, you're doubling up on the "of." The "of which" already contains the "of" you try to end the sentence with.

Depending on the browser and font, your scene break dividers are running longer than one line. Either use a shorter one and center it or take advantage of the [hr] character that FiMFiction provides.

>How do you explain to your adopted daughter that you weren’t always the humble grape farmer that she knew you as?//

Right off the bat, you're striking an odd note with your narrator. I did a search of "you" through the first chapter. Most occur in dialogue. Of the ones that appear in narration, some are of the type that are meant as a generic person; they're not necessarily addressed at me. For those, it might be better to rephrase them so they don't tend to address the reader, but that's not a huge problem. What bothers me is your opening scene. In there, the narrator definitely addresses the reader. You don't keep that up through the story, so it's almost like you're creating a frame for the story in which Berry is sitting down with me and telling me the story. That begs the questions: Who am I to her? Why am I there? Why does she want me in particular to hear it? Why am I listening? When you create a character for me to be, that character needs the same justifications for being there and motivations as any other character would. You can't just skip that part because you think it'd be interesting to use this framing device.

>Clint Clydesdale//

I have no idea what pun this is supposed to be. It sounds nothing like "Eastwood," so I have to think you're just making something up out of the blue, and in that case, I have no reference as to how menacing this is supposed to be.

>She has this wild poof of orange hair and her cutie mark is a bunch of carrots, which labeled her as a farmer.//

Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. I see a number of these throughout the story. And that "labeled" shouldn't be in past tense, assuming there isn't some reason it wouldn't label her as a farmer anymore.

>some horse college//

Assuming you're making a pun on "cow college" (really, I can't figure out what else this might mean), an A&M university would be a cow college, right?

>if was to come for the ceremony//

Missing a word. Really, this would use subjunctive mood as well ("were"), but it's up to you as to whether Berry knows that.

>NOT//

Italics are preferred for emphasis.

>two twins//

Redundant.

>head-to-hoof//

In this usage, there's no need to hyphenate this. It's not being used as a modifier.

>shampooed and conditioned my main and tail//

Are you serious? There are a few words that I expect anyone who writes horse words to get right.

>plum colored//

That one does need a hyphen.

>As a further act of contrition//

I'm still not buying why Rarity would be feeling contrite. She enforced her standards and got Berry to abide by them. She should be satisfied, not apologetic.

>Phillydelphia//

You're missing the pun by spelling it that way…

>Making wine is fun, it’s also how I make my living.//

Comma splice.

>He winced l and crinkled his nose at me.//

Jumbled wording.

>in disapproval//

You've been doing well so far, but I'll point you to the discussion on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread for an explanation of why phrases like this are usually empty filler.

>rocked off my flank and barely able to stand on all fours//

This is an oddly candid assessment from her, given that she's been insistent that she can handle her liquor and doesn't actually drink all that much. We have all the evidence we need from her actions, and that disconnect is rather telling of her problem, so it's a little disappointing to see her acknowledge it so readily.

>hoping up and down//

Typo.

>some other pony’s fur under my hooves//

How does that work? They're not like fingernails, where there's actually a space for things to get caught. I don't know where fur would collect or how it would get there.

>you’ve give anything to take back//

Typo and a missing word.

>She didn’t look very happy to see me//

You've got a few spots like this, too, where you draw the conclusion for me instead of describing how she looks and acts and let me deduce how she feels. That said, you get some leeway in a first-person narration.

>Merry was delighted and was practically bouncing on her hooves. She still had her cap and gown on and was carrying her diploma in a new saddlebag. My sister, Sherry, was holding back.//

What's with all the past participles? Besides creating a repetitive feel, it's not really fitting what's around it.

>full grown//

Hyphen needed again.

>Look Auntie Berry!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>I should’ve just left her hold onto it.//

Typo.

>It was a thing of beauty and I had destroyed it.//

This is an emotional climax of your story. At least it should be, except that there is absolutely no emotion here. This is all factual. She's telling me what events occurred, but I'm getting zero evidence as to how she felt about it. Maybe you do so later, but by then, it's to far disconnected from the actual occurrence. Here's where you really need to draw me into her viewpoint and get me to feel what she does. This is the essence of an engaging read. Really, I didn't have too many complaints about the story until now, but this definitely needs some attention.

>I don’t know which was worse—the sound of the frame breaking or the sound of my niece crying.//

>What was the big deal? I was sure they’d replace it.//
I can't see how these two things are compatible.

>I…I…//

I'll finally say something about this. We do see writers use this format sometimes, but I'm never sure whether it's something they were taught, as it's an unusual system. Most common is to put a space between the ellipsis and the word that follows it.

>I sat on my flank on the floor//

What floor is this? The last place you mentioned where she was, it was in the dirt outside the auditorium.

>Forget it! Just stay away. Stay away forever!//

Her daughter's old enough to make this decision for herself, and she was actually happy to see Berry. I could see Sherry saying this for herself, but not for her daughter as well.

>so I hoisted myself up and trudged back to the station//

Comma to set off the dependent clause.

>vomit//

When did this happen, and why did she never mention it until now?

>trip–no//

You've got proper dashes elsewhere in the story, so why not here?

>and wasn’t none too happy //

She hasn't adopted any speech patterns so far that lead me to believe she'd use s double negative like this.

>That won’t do miss.//

Another missing comma for direct address.

>shards of glass got//

Where's the glass coming from? And you have an extraneous space in there.

>When I finally stopped I didn’t even open my eyes, I just lay there//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause, and the comma you do have here is a splice.

>spread eagled//

Another hyphen, please.

I'll also mention this here: You have 52 instances just of "was" in this chapter. I'm sure I'd find more if I checked other forms of "to be." I noticed a lot of them in chapter 1 as well. This is an inherently boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens than what is. You really need to be choosing more active verbs. This is a lot for this word count—more than one every third sentence for "was" alone. That increases to one every other sentence if I include a few more of the common forms of this verb. Some of that verb is fine, but this is too much. I bet you can rephrase things in a more active way for a half of those or more.

>I never placed much stock in things like that.//

This is the fifth straight sentence to begin with "I."

>I kept my thoughts occupied //

The relationship is skewed here. Nothing occupies her thoughts, but her thoughts can occupy her.

>If I couldn’t remember the constellations, I thought I’d made up a few of my own.//

Verb tense.

>but I would get lost and somehow the thing would find me//

She states this as a certainty, while it feels more like a probability, unless she wants to state that she's sure it would happen this way.

>my hopes of reaching Ponyville by afternoon was diminishing//

Subject/verb number disagreement.

>I was relieved but still very uneasy.//

Yes, but give me the symptoms, not the diagnosis. I need to be able to picture this in my head. You're making me do all the work.

>They stood and moved about on their back legs.//

Yes, you already said so.

>Their faces were flat//

Fifth straight sentence that starts with "they" or "their."

>Berryshine…//

Missing a line break.

>the one whom I thought was the leader//

Who

>Their next act really frightened me.//

Yes, but aside from the narrator outright telling me this, I wouldn't know. She's certainly not acting or speaking like she's afraid.

>What do you want from me.//

It's a question, yes?

>No. You are not.//

Why is this not italicized like the rest of their speech?

>That wasn’t much there that looked interesting//

Phrasing

>Little pieces of junk was scattered//

Subject/verb number agreement.

I'l also say here that I'm noticing a lot more word repetition in this chapter.

>Do you think you could find your own home on it?//

More missed italics.

>Then how would pointing out our home on it be any help?//

Another missed line break.

>some bit of the junk that was just laying around//

Lay/lie confusion, but your call on whether Berry would know that.

>My sister and niece? Well, it took a while, but they forgave me, too.//

So, the entire conflict you slowly built up is miraculously solved, and off-screen at that?

Okay, what the hell did I just read?

You spent the first two chapters presenting a nice life challenge for her. As I've said, my main complaints with it are that we got little to no emotional investment in it, and Berry's attitude keeps wavering. It's all presented in a very clinical and dry manner, and Berry herself doesn't seem to react much to it, but at least the premise was there. This was workable.

And then you threw in chapter 3. It had absolutely nothing to do with anything that came before. It's not related to her history or her problem. It does nothing to resolve that problem. It does nothing to shed a new light on her character. It just… does nothing. You could cut that entire chapter from the story, and you'd be better for it. And then the real conflict you'd cultivated all along conveniently goes away. No emotional struggle, no self-discovery, no confrontation with her family. It just goes away.

You had a promising beginning, but then the whole thing ran off the rails. I'd encourage you to punch up the first two chapters with a lot more emotional context and a steady attitude toward her problem, give some thought to how you want to handle the device of having me as a character that she's telling her story, then scrap the last two chapters and reimagine the ending. Resolve that conflict that you spent so long creating. Let me see it unfold in front of me, not just get a half-sentence summary that assures me everything worked out.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berryshine is a pony with a history and a reputation, neither of which she is very proud of. However, a series of events forces her to re-examine her life.//</span><br />First, that&#039;s not a very enticing synopsis. You&#039;d do better to play up the emotions surrounding this re-examining. Frankly, the same can be said of the title. Second, you&#039;re doubling up on the &quot;of.&quot; The &quot;of which&quot; already contains the &quot;of&quot; you try to end the sentence with.<br /><br />Depending on the browser and font, your scene break dividers are running longer than one line. Either use a shorter one and center it or take advantage of the [hr] character that FiMFiction provides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How do you explain to your adopted daughter that you weren’t always the humble grape farmer that she knew you as?//</span><br />Right off the bat, you&#039;re striking an odd note with your narrator. I did a search of &quot;you&quot; through the first chapter. Most occur in dialogue. Of the ones that appear in narration, some are of the type that are meant as a generic person; they&#039;re not necessarily addressed at me. For those, it might be better to rephrase them so they don&#039;t tend to address the reader, but that&#039;s not a huge problem. What bothers me is your opening scene. In there, the narrator definitely addresses the reader. You don&#039;t keep that up through the story, so it&#039;s almost like you&#039;re creating a frame for the story in which Berry is sitting down with me and telling me the story. That begs the questions: Who am I to her? Why am I there? Why does she want me in particular to hear it? Why am I listening? When you create a character for me to be, that character needs the same justifications for being there and motivations as any other character would. You can&#039;t just skip that part because you think it&#039;d be interesting to use this framing device.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Clint Clydesdale//</span><br />I have no idea what pun this is supposed to be. It sounds nothing like &quot;Eastwood,&quot; so I have to think you&#039;re just making something up out of the blue, and in that case, I have no reference as to how menacing this is supposed to be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She has this wild poof of orange hair and her cutie mark is a bunch of carrots, which labeled her as a farmer.//</span><br />Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. I see a number of these throughout the story. And that &quot;labeled&quot; shouldn&#039;t be in past tense, assuming there isn&#039;t some reason it wouldn&#039;t label her as a farmer anymore.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;some horse college//</span><br />Assuming you&#039;re making a pun on &quot;cow college&quot; (really, I can&#039;t figure out what else this might mean), an A&amp;M university would be a cow college, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if was to come for the ceremony//</span><br />Missing a word. Really, this would use subjunctive mood as well (&quot;were&quot;), but it&#039;s up to you as to whether Berry knows that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;NOT//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two twins//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;head-to-hoof//</span><br />In this usage, there&#039;s no need to hyphenate this. It&#039;s not being used as a modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shampooed and conditioned my main and tail//</span><br />Are you serious? There are a few words that I expect anyone who writes horse words to get right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;plum colored//</span><br />That one does need a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As a further act of contrition//</span><br />I&#039;m still not buying why Rarity would be feeling contrite. She enforced her standards and got Berry to abide by them. She should be satisfied, not apologetic.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Phillydelphia//</span><br />You&#039;re missing the pun by spelling it that way…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Making wine is fun, it’s also how I make my living.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He winced l and crinkled his nose at me.//</span><br />Jumbled wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in disapproval//</span><br />You&#039;ve been doing well so far, but I&#039;ll point you to the discussion on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread for an explanation of why phrases like this are usually empty filler.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rocked off my flank and barely able to stand on all fours//</span><br />This is an oddly candid assessment from her, given that she&#039;s been insistent that she can handle her liquor and doesn&#039;t actually drink all that much. We have all the evidence we need from her actions, and that disconnect is rather telling of her problem, so it&#039;s a little disappointing to see her acknowledge it so readily.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoping up and down//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;some other pony’s fur under my hooves//</span><br />How does that work? They&#039;re not like fingernails, where there&#039;s actually a space for things to get caught. I don&#039;t know where fur would collect or how it would get there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you’ve give anything to take back//</span><br />Typo and a missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t look very happy to see me//</span><br />You&#039;ve got a few spots like this, too, where you draw the conclusion for me instead of describing how she looks and acts and let me deduce how she feels. That said, you get some leeway in a first-person narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Merry was delighted and was practically bouncing on her hooves. She still had her cap and gown on and was carrying her diploma in a new saddlebag. My sister, Sherry, was holding back.//</span><br />What&#039;s with all the past participles? Besides creating a repetitive feel, it&#039;s not really fitting what&#039;s around it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;full grown//</span><br />Hyphen needed again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look Auntie Berry!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I should’ve just left her hold onto it.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a thing of beauty and I had destroyed it.//</span><br />This is an emotional climax of your story. At least it should be, except that there is absolutely no emotion here. This is all factual. She&#039;s telling me what events occurred, but I&#039;m getting zero evidence as to how she felt about it. Maybe you do so later, but by then, it&#039;s to far disconnected from the actual occurrence. Here&#039;s where you really need to draw me into her viewpoint and get me to feel what she does. This is the essence of an engaging read. Really, I didn&#039;t have too many complaints about the story until now, but this definitely needs some attention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t know which was worse—the sound of the frame breaking or the sound of my niece crying.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What was the big deal? I was sure they’d replace it.//</span><br />I can&#039;t see how these two things are compatible.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I…I…//</span><br />I&#039;ll finally say something about this. We do see writers use this format sometimes, but I&#039;m never sure whether it&#039;s something they were taught, as it&#039;s an unusual system. Most common is to put a space between the ellipsis and the word that follows it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I sat on my flank on the floor//</span><br />What floor is this? The last place you mentioned where she was, it was in the dirt outside the auditorium.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Forget it! Just stay away. Stay away forever!//</span><br />Her daughter&#039;s old enough to make this decision for herself, and she was actually happy to see Berry. I could see Sherry saying this for herself, but not for her daughter as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so I hoisted myself up and trudged back to the station//</span><br />Comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;vomit//</span><br />When did this happen, and why did she never mention it until now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trip–no//</span><br />You&#039;ve got proper dashes elsewhere in the story, so why not here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and wasn’t none too happy //</span><br />She hasn&#039;t adopted any speech patterns so far that lead me to believe she&#039;d use s double negative like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That won’t do miss.//</span><br />Another missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shards of glass got//</span><br />Where&#039;s the glass coming from? And you have an extraneous space in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I finally stopped I didn’t even open my eyes, I just lay there//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause, and the comma you do have here is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spread eagled//</span><br />Another hyphen, please.<br /><br />I&#039;ll also mention this here: You have 52 instances just of &quot;was&quot; in this chapter. I&#039;m sure I&#039;d find more if I checked other forms of &quot;to be.&quot; I noticed a lot of them in chapter 1 as well. This is an inherently boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens than what is. You really need to be choosing more active verbs. This is a lot for this word count—more than one every third sentence for &quot;was&quot; alone. That increases to one every other sentence if I include a few more of the common forms of this verb. Some of that verb is fine, but this is too much. I bet you can rephrase things in a more active way for a half of those or more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I never placed much stock in things like that.//</span><br />This is the fifth straight sentence to begin with &quot;I.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I kept my thoughts occupied //</span><br />The relationship is skewed here. Nothing occupies her thoughts, but her thoughts can occupy her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I couldn’t remember the constellations, I thought I’d made up a few of my own.//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but I would get lost and somehow the thing would find me//</span><br />She states this as a certainty, while it feels more like a probability, unless she wants to state that she&#039;s sure it would happen this way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my hopes of reaching Ponyville by afternoon was diminishing//</span><br />Subject/verb number disagreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was relieved but still very uneasy.//</span><br />Yes, but give me the symptoms, not the diagnosis. I need to be able to picture this in my head. You&#039;re making me do all the work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They stood and moved about on their back legs.//</span><br />Yes, you already said so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Their faces were flat//</span><br />Fifth straight sentence that starts with &quot;they&quot; or &quot;their.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berryshine…//</span><br />Missing a line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the one whom I thought was the leader//</span><br />Who<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Their next act really frightened me.//</span><br />Yes, but aside from the narrator outright telling me this, I wouldn&#039;t know. She&#039;s certainly not acting or speaking like she&#039;s afraid.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What do you want from me.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No. You are not.//</span><br />Why is this not italicized like the rest of their speech?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That wasn’t much there that looked interesting//</span><br />Phrasing<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Little pieces of junk was scattered//</span><br />Subject/verb number agreement.<br /><br />I&#039;l also say here that I&#039;m noticing a lot more word repetition in this chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do you think you could find your own home on it?//</span><br />More missed italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then how would pointing out our home on it be any help?//</span><br />Another missed line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;some bit of the junk that was just laying around//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion, but your call on whether Berry would know that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My sister and niece? Well, it took a while, but they forgave me, too.//</span><br />So, the entire conflict you slowly built up is miraculously solved, and off-screen at that?<br /><br />Okay, what the hay did I just read?<br /><br />You spent the first two chapters presenting a nice life challenge for her. As I&#039;ve said, my main complaints with it are that we got little to no emotional investment in it, and Berry&#039;s attitude keeps wavering. It&#039;s all presented in a very clinical and dry manner, and Berry herself doesn&#039;t seem to react much to it, but at least the premise was there. This was workable.<br /><br />And then you threw in chapter 3. It had absolutely nothing to do with anything that came before. It&#039;s not related to her history or her problem. It does nothing to resolve that problem. It does nothing to shed a new light on her character. It just… does nothing. You could cut that entire chapter from the story, and you&#039;d be better for it. And then the real conflict you&#039;d cultivated all along conveniently goes away. No emotional struggle, no self-discovery, no confrontation with her family. It just goes away.<br /><br />You had a promising beginning, but then the whole thing ran off the rails. I&#039;d encourage you to punch up the first two chapters with a lot more emotional context and a steady attitude toward her problem, give some thought to how you want to handle the device of having me as a character that she&#039;s telling her story, then scrap the last two chapters and reimagine the ending. Resolve that conflict that you spent so long creating. Let me see it unfold in front of me, not just get a half-sentence summary that assures me everything worked out.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 77

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Why are her colours muted and melancholy when theirs are bright and cheerful?//

There are plenty of examples of unexciting colorings. Time Turner… Octavia… Caramel… Are you saying that such color schemes didn't exist when this story takes place?

>"Where am I?," she thought.//

Dialogue punctuation.

>She used her somewhat logical brain, to try and piece together her past.//

Unnecessary comma.

>"Hello?" Grey Scale called out once more, becoming nervous.//

I get that you're trying to make this pony very logical and analytical. But that doesn't mean she has no emotion, just that she supporesses it. Yet you've really given me nothing to indicate how she feels about her situation. If she doesn't care, why should I? And then here, where you finally give me some emotional context, it's all tell and no show. Look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Friendly consciousness, do you know the same information as your dark counterpart?//

The very fact that they answer to these titles (and indicated them to her themselves, no less!) really undercuts the dilemma she's having in choosing between them.

>Not really, but you can call me Loyalty if you want.//

Fine point, but I get what you're doing here in trying to suggest this is somehow Rainbow Dash's personality, but it doesn't seem like her as much as the dark one seems like Nightmare Moon. Some of the speech sounds like Dash well enough, but she's pretty lazy, too, and it's not really like her to be so forward in volunteering to help a friend; she more sits back and waits to be asked. And she's only warning Gray Scale about NMM instead of being disdainful toward her. I don't think Dash would be that respectful.

>perfectly preened slate grey//

Hyphenate the compound modifier (slate-grey) and put a comma after "preened." These are essentially coordinate adjectives.

>Yeah, but I think Nightmare just sort of tunes you and I out.//

People often use "you and I" in this manner for fear of getting it wrong. Sometimes "you and me" is correct, as in this case.

>the first sign she saw of civilisation//

Watch the repetition. You used almost the same phrasing a few paragraphs back.

>fenced in//

Another compound modifier that needs a hyphen.

>"My name is Fluttershy…"//

Using a visual effect like font size is a fairly lazy way of getting around actually having to describe the voice in narration. And with regards to this conversation, read the section on "talking heads" at the top of this thread.

>she trailed off//

You don't need to tell me she trailed off when I can already tell that from the punctuation.

>"Well, um, the only alicorns I've ever seen are the princesses and Twilight," -Fluttershy shivered- "And Nightmare Moon…"//

Please use proper dashes. Here's how to capitalize/punctuate an aside like this:
"Well, um, the only alicorns I've ever seen are the princesses and Twilight"—Fluttershy shivered—"and Nightmare Moon…"

>You sorta look like somepony else I know too, but I can't really put my hoof on it…Anyway, her cutie mark was a turquoise crescent moon on a dark purple background.//

So she can't quite remember who this is, yet perfectly remembers her cutie mark?

>Most fled with cries of 'Nightmare Moon!' when they saw her cutie mark.//

So with this much evidence as to what her name might be, what's her motivation to keep thinking of herself as Grey Scale? Might be worth seeing a bit of her thought process on this.

>So you're the one who's been scaring everypony in town, eh?//

How in the world has Rainbow even heard about this yet?

>Rainbow Dash wondered why 'Nightmare Moon' wasn't using any magic.//

Why are you changing perspective here? Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>am not, Nightmare Moon//

Why is that comma there?

So, why was Rainbow Dash just sitting around her house if she's been warned about Nightmare Moon? She also has surprisingly little reaction to the injuries she's sustained.

New alicorns are long-standing objects of skepticism in this fandom, and with good reason. They're often too good to be true. Now, I don't see any warning signs screaming at me so far, but we're also not far enough into the story to see exactly what she's going to do. I'd encourage you to wait until you have a couple more chapters or to include a brief outline of your expected plot if you decide to resubmit, so we can see what direction the story will take.

The main issue I'd stress the most is the lack of emotional context to most of what happens. The story focuses on the events that happen at the expense of how the characters feel about it. And then when we do get some emotional content, it's handed to us bluntly instead of through the subtle cues that make for an engaging read.

I'd also caution you on overuse of "to be" verbs. There are 35 instances of "was" alone in chapter 2, and they often get used in clusters. Consider whether you could be choosing more active verbs. "To be" is just boring.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why are her colours muted and melancholy when theirs are bright and cheerful?//</span><br />There are plenty of examples of unexciting colorings. Time Turner… Octavia… Caramel… Are you saying that such color schemes didn&#039;t exist when this story takes place?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;<i>Where am I?</i>,&quot; she thought.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She used her somewhat logical brain, to try and piece together her past.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Hello?&quot; Grey Scale called out once more, becoming nervous.//</span><br />I get that you&#039;re trying to make this pony very logical and analytical. But that doesn&#039;t mean she has no emotion, just that she supporesses it. Yet you&#039;ve really given me nothing to indicate how she feels about her situation. If she doesn&#039;t care, why should I? And then here, where you finally give me some emotional context, it&#039;s all tell and no show. Look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Friendly consciousness, do you know the same information as your dark counterpart?//</span><br />The very fact that they answer to these titles (and indicated them to her themselves, no less!) really undercuts the dilemma she&#039;s having in choosing between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not really, but you can call me Loyalty if you want.//</span><br />Fine point, but I get what you&#039;re doing here in trying to suggest this is somehow Rainbow Dash&#039;s personality, but it doesn&#039;t seem like her as much as the dark one seems like Nightmare Moon. Some of the speech sounds like Dash well enough, but she&#039;s pretty lazy, too, and it&#039;s not really like her to be so forward in volunteering to help a friend; she more sits back and waits to be asked. And she&#039;s only warning Gray Scale about NMM instead of being disdainful toward her. I don&#039;t think Dash would be that respectful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;perfectly preened slate grey//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier (slate-grey) and put a comma after &quot;preened.&quot; These are essentially coordinate adjectives.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, but I think Nightmare just sort of tunes you and I out.//</span><br />People often use &quot;you and I&quot; in this manner for fear of getting it wrong. Sometimes &quot;you and me&quot; is correct, as in this case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the first sign she saw of civilisation//</span><br />Watch the repetition. You used almost the same phrasing a few paragraphs back.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fenced in//</span><br />Another compound modifier that needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;My name is Fluttershy…&quot;//</span><br />Using a visual effect like font size is a fairly lazy way of getting around actually having to describe the voice in narration. And with regards to this conversation, read the section on &quot;talking heads&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she trailed off//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to tell me she trailed off when I can already tell that from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Well, um, the only alicorns I&#039;ve ever seen are the princesses and Twilight,&quot; -Fluttershy shivered- &quot;And Nightmare Moon…&quot;//</span><br />Please use proper dashes. Here&#039;s how to capitalize/punctuate an aside like this:<br />&quot;Well, um, the only alicorns I&#039;ve ever seen are the princesses and Twilight&quot;—Fluttershy shivered—&quot;and Nightmare Moon…&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You sorta look like somepony else I know too, but I can&#039;t really put my hoof on it…Anyway, her cutie mark was a turquoise crescent moon on a dark purple background.//</span><br />So she can&#039;t quite remember who this is, yet perfectly remembers her cutie mark?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Most fled with cries of &#039;Nightmare Moon!&#039; when they saw her cutie mark.//</span><br />So with this much evidence as to what her name might be, what&#039;s her motivation to keep thinking of herself as Grey Scale? Might be worth seeing a bit of her thought process on this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So you&#039;re the one who&#039;s been scaring everypony in town, eh?//</span><br />How in the world has Rainbow even heard about this yet?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash wondered why &#039;Nightmare Moon&#039; wasn&#039;t using any magic.//</span><br />Why are you changing perspective here? Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;am not, Nightmare Moon//</span><br />Why is that comma there?<br /><br />So, why was Rainbow Dash just sitting around her house if she&#039;s been warned about Nightmare Moon? She also has surprisingly little reaction to the injuries she&#039;s sustained.<br /><br />New alicorns are long-standing objects of skepticism in this fandom, and with good reason. They&#039;re often too good to be true. Now, I don&#039;t see any warning signs screaming at me so far, but we&#039;re also not far enough into the story to see exactly what she&#039;s going to do. I&#039;d encourage you to wait until you have a couple more chapters or to include a brief outline of your expected plot if you decide to resubmit, so we can see what direction the story will take.<br /><br />The main issue I&#039;d stress the most is the lack of emotional context to most of what happens. The story focuses on the events that happen at the expense of how the characters feel about it. And then when we do get some emotional content, it&#039;s handed to us bluntly instead of through the subtle cues that make for an engaging read.<br /><br />I&#039;d also caution you on overuse of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. There are 35 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone in chapter 2, and they often get used in clusters. Consider whether you could be choosing more active verbs. &quot;To be&quot; is just boring.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 78

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Oh Maker, don't let me be wrong…//

My first impression is that you have an awful lot of "to be" verbs in your opening scene. They're boring verbs. They don't make things happen. This is where you should be grabbing the reader's attention, and active verbs are much better at that. I'll also say that it would help solidify things a little bit if you gave an antecedent for all those pronouns. You use "she" and "her" a lot in this scene. I'd recommend replacing the first instance with something a little more definite, even if it's generic, like "that pony" or some such. Missing a comma for direct address here, too.

Second scene:
There's no reason for this to be in italics. It's already identifiable as a flashback, and it's not a small part of another scene; it's a scene all its own. The point of italics is to make something stand out, but when you make the entire scene stand out, nothing does, and it just gets irritating to read that much italic type.

>the streets had been overflowing with crowds that day, for reasons I'd never kept track of//

This is nonsensical. Why would anyone keep track of reasons why the streets would be crowded? And when not doing so is the default, pointing out that she didn't has no meaning.

>I struggled on the borders of the crowd, trying to resist the forcefulness of the music she controlled//

Watch your misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the crowd is trying to resist.

>Atop the stage of a fountain//

What is the stage of a fountain?

>And she kissed me//

She's into kissing random strangers? I hope this ends up meaning something to the story…

>I'd learnt to play their music before I could speak their tongue//

I get that equine anatomy means playing it in a different way, but their music is exactly like ours. Your word choices of "starting from scratch" and "their music" seems to imply she already had knowledge, but had to adapt, yet, like I said, aside from the physical movements, there wouldn't be any need to re-learn what she already knew.

>her speakers set perilously on my bare coffee table, surmounted by a pair of sunglasses//

This really sounds like the sunglasses are on the speakers. There is a real danger of misinterpretations like this when you string together so many descriptive elements in a sentence. And I find that you keep having these lists of participles, absolutes, etc. Take the sentence this comes from: <clause fragment>, <absolute phrase>, <absolute phrase>, <absolute phrase>, <participial phrase>. The more unusual sentence structures stick out more and more quickly create a repetitive feel when you use them too much. And this structure in particular really makes it feel like I'm readin a list. It gets in a rut.

>she looked at me curiously//

You get somewhat of a pass on telly language for a first-person narrator, but not so much when she's describing other people. What does this look like? Describe it and get me to conclude she's curious. You might want to read over the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>I muttered, flicking on the coffee maker on the counter, ignoring her//

And another example of stacking elements. It's ambiguous whether they're stacked. It more readily says that the counter is ignoring her.

>like bees to a beautiful flower//

The "beautiful" is irrelevant here, since it has nothing to do with why the bees are there.

>She could have swept the classical scene under the carpet with ease.//

This is a pretty sweeping statement. Are you saying that the Equestrian music scene is so different from ours? If so, it bears mentioning. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I'm going to assume Equestrian tastes in music are similar to ours. Or are you saying this type of music is new to them? If so, again I need some justification.

>less and less patrons//

"Less" is for collective quantities. You want "fewer."

>her eyes featureless behind tinted glass//

So how can she see them?

>As if she could ever understand my past, that section of myself that none of them could ever understand.//

I don't see the point of the repetition. With some well-placed emphasis, you could call attention to it and thus use it for effect, but as is, it just feels like an oversight.

>like a newborn flinching from a mother's touch//

When does this ever happen? This would be a sign of a medical problem or abuse.

>reaching for the-//

Please use a proper dash.

>"Yes," I cleared my throat, "yes, I think we do."//

Your attribution has no speaking verb.

>"Better than Doe," She smirked, "and Please, call me Vee. Everyone does."//

Same thing, and it's incorrectly capitalized.

>She looked uncomfortable now//

Yeah, you're doing it again. By bluntly informing me of her emotions, you don't make me figure her out, and figuring her out is what immerses me in the story and makes me care about your characters.

>I am still learning myself//

I hope you meant that to work on multiple levels, because it does.

>So what do you play; Violin, double bass…cello?//

Misused semicolon, unnecessary capitalization.

>"Piano," She said mechanically, "Just//

The way you've punctuated this, it's one sentence, so the quote goes:
Piano, just started today…
That sounds odd to me, but maybe you wanted it that way. In any case, you'e got a bad capitalization here, and possibly a second one of those and a punctuation error.

>I heard in the media of her errors//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

>She was the reason they were there, I was just a sideshow//

Comma splice.

>And as the show came to a close amid roaring applause that first night, and we bowed together, side by side as equals, even in our overwhelming victory, I still managed to hate her.//

And even more oppressively dens description. Look at how front-loaded that sentence is. The main though is "I still managed to hate her," but it gets dwarfed by all the intro.

>If we walked to close together//

To/too confusion

>what I//

Extraneous space.

>dancing under candelabras of spinning gold//

Another phrase that I have no idea as to what it means.

>The theft of my cello case, and my precious necklace within.//

Why is this not indented?

>it's star flashing as I gave chase//

Its/it's confusion.

>"Sunset Shimmer!"//

Okay, you lost me. What possible motive would Sunset have for taking this? The crown had a purpose. She stole it because she needed it to accomplish something specific. She wasn't a petty thief out for monetary gain. If you want me to believe she'd want the cello (or maybe the necklace, and in that case why she knew it was there and why she wanted the cello with it), you'll need to justify it. Lugging that thing around will seriously hamper her ability to get away, and to what end? What possible use does she have for it?

>naked//

Um… Twilight showed up fully clothed. Don't go all Ponyfall on me.

>to keep//

Another extraneous space.

>Her eyes, her heart, her soul ware all the same//

I'm assuming that's a typo.

>The ups and downs show you're alive//

Missing end punctuation.

>Y-Yeah//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, you only do the first one.

>maker//

You capitalized that earlier.

>months….//

One too many dots there.

I hit on most of the points I wanted to make in the detailed items, so just a few more.

This writing is very dense and purple. Besides the stacking up of elements I already noted, it makes sentences ramble on long enough to where they lose focus. Both of those are definite issues at times. The purpleness is subjective. I will say it didn't bother me so much, but I'm unusually tolerant of that. It will turn off a decent number of potential readers, though.

I also touched on the plot problem I had with why Sunset Shimmer stole the cello. And you never hint at whether Octavia ever finds her necklace. There are also some odd deviations, like how the counterparts all have the same names. Why would Octavia adopt a different name, unless she'd encountered that world's version of her, in which case why did nobody find it odd that they looked the same? And why would she adopt a name that doesn't really fit in that world?

We're also left with a weak resolution and odd pacing. There's no big conflict that gets solved at the end—just a reunion that was obvious from the beginning. Some stories can survive with that, and I didn't think this was bad on that front, but just that it doesn't address the aftermath. Did Vinyl come through before or after Twilight, such that they know how to return? Is that the next battle, or are they just going to stay where they are? What kind of doesn't help you here is that you actually did have a stronger conflict earlier: their learning to appreciate each other. And I wouldn't at all recommend taking that out to make the ending stronger in contrast, since it serves another function of justifying their feelings for each other, something that too many romance stories skip over and expect us to take for granted.

And a bit more aout the "to be" verbs. You had 95 instances of "was" alone. That is a huge amount for this word count. You really need to be choosing more active verbs.

So… you made me like a TaviScratch, which is no mean feat. The only things I'd say really have to be fixed are the odd mechanical things, the nonsensical phrasings, get the emotional context less telly, and the dialogue punctuation/capitalization/attribution problems. I'd also recommend you look at the plot points and element stacking/dense prose, but if they're not things you're willing to address, say so if/when you resubmit so I can let a different pre-reader evaluate it for those.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh Maker, don&#039;t let me be wrong…//</span><br />My first impression is that you have an awful lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs in your opening scene. They&#039;re boring verbs. They don&#039;t make things happen. This is where you should be grabbing the reader&#039;s attention, and active verbs are much better at that. I&#039;ll also say that it would help solidify things a little bit if you gave an antecedent for all those pronouns. You use &quot;she&quot; and &quot;her&quot; a lot in this scene. I&#039;d recommend replacing the first instance with something a little more definite, even if it&#039;s generic, like &quot;that pony&quot; or some such. Missing a comma for direct address here, too.<br /><br />Second scene:<br />There&#039;s no reason for this to be in italics. It&#039;s already identifiable as a flashback, and it&#039;s not a small part of another scene; it&#039;s a scene all its own. The point of italics is to make something stand out, but when you make the entire scene stand out, nothing does, and it just gets irritating to read that much italic type.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the streets had been overflowing with crowds that day, for reasons I&#039;d never kept track of//</span><br />This is nonsensical. Why would anyone keep track of reasons why the streets would be crowded? And when not doing so is the default, pointing out that she didn&#039;t has no meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I struggled on the borders of the crowd, trying to resist the forcefulness of the music she controlled//</span><br />Watch your misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the crowd is trying to resist.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Atop the stage of a fountain//</span><br />What is the stage of a fountain?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And she kissed me//</span><br />She&#039;s into kissing random strangers? I hope this ends up meaning something to the story…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;d learnt to play their music before I could speak their tongue//</span><br />I get that equine anatomy means playing it in a different way, but their music is exactly like ours. Your word choices of &quot;starting from scratch&quot; and &quot;their music&quot; seems to imply she already had knowledge, but had to adapt, yet, like I said, aside from the physical movements, there wouldn&#039;t be any need to re-learn what she already knew.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her speakers set perilously on my bare coffee table, surmounted by a pair of sunglasses//</span><br />This really sounds like the sunglasses are on the speakers. There is a real danger of misinterpretations like this when you string together so many descriptive elements in a sentence. And I find that you keep having these lists of participles, absolutes, etc. Take the sentence this comes from: &lt;clause fragment&gt;, &lt;absolute phrase&gt;, &lt;absolute phrase&gt;, &lt;absolute phrase&gt;, &lt;participial phrase&gt;. The more unusual sentence structures stick out more and more quickly create a repetitive feel when you use them too much. And this structure in particular really makes it feel like I&#039;m readin a list. It gets in a rut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she looked at me curiously//</span><br />You get somewhat of a pass on telly language for a first-person narrator, but not so much when she&#039;s describing other people. What does this look like? Describe it and get me to conclude she&#039;s curious. You might want to read over the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I muttered, flicking on the coffee maker on the counter, ignoring her//</span><br />And another example of stacking elements. It&#039;s ambiguous whether they&#039;re stacked. It more readily says that the counter is ignoring her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like bees to a beautiful flower//</span><br />The &quot;beautiful&quot; is irrelevant here, since it has nothing to do with why the bees are there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could have swept the classical scene under the carpet with ease.//</span><br />This is a pretty sweeping statement. Are you saying that the Equestrian music scene is so different from ours? If so, it bears mentioning. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I&#039;m going to assume Equestrian tastes in music are similar to ours. Or are you saying this type of music is new to them? If so, again I need some justification.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;less and less patrons//</span><br />&quot;Less&quot; is for collective quantities. You want &quot;fewer.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyes featureless behind tinted glass//</span><br />So how can she see them?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As if she could ever understand my past, that section of myself that none of them could ever understand.//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the point of the repetition. With some well-placed emphasis, you could call attention to it and thus use it for effect, but as is, it just feels like an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like a newborn flinching from a mother&#039;s touch//</span><br />When does this ever happen? This would be a sign of a medical problem or abuse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reaching for the-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Yes,&quot; I cleared my throat, &quot;yes, I think we do.&quot;//</span><br />Your attribution has no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Better than Doe,&quot; She smirked, &quot;and Please, call me Vee. Everyone does.&quot;//</span><br />Same thing, and it&#039;s incorrectly capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked uncomfortable now//</span><br />Yeah, you&#039;re doing it again. By bluntly informing me of her emotions, you don&#039;t make me figure her out, and figuring her out is what immerses me in the story and makes me care about your characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am still learning myself//</span><br />I hope you meant that to work on multiple levels, because it does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So what do you play; Violin, double bass…cello?//</span><br />Misused semicolon, unnecessary capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Piano,&quot; She said mechanically, &quot;Just//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve punctuated this, it&#039;s one sentence, so the quote goes:<br />Piano, just started today…<br />That sounds odd to me, but maybe you wanted it that way. In any case, you&#039;e got a bad capitalization here, and possibly a second one of those and a punctuation error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I heard in the media of her errors//</span><br />I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was the reason they were there, I was just a sideshow//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And as the show came to a close amid roaring applause that first night, and we bowed together, side by side as equals, even in our overwhelming victory, I still managed to hate her.//</span><br />And even more oppressively dens description. Look at how front-loaded that sentence is. The main though is &quot;I still managed to hate her,&quot; but it gets dwarfed by all the intro.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If we walked to close together//</span><br />To/too confusion<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;what I//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dancing under candelabras of spinning gold//</span><br />Another phrase that I have no idea as to what it means.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The theft of my cello case, and my precious necklace within.//</span><br />Why is this not indented?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it&#039;s star flashing as I gave chase//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Sunset Shimmer!&quot;//</span><br />Okay, you lost me. What possible motive would Sunset have for taking this? The crown had a purpose. She stole it because she needed it to accomplish something specific. She wasn&#039;t a petty thief out for monetary gain. If you want me to believe she&#039;d want the cello (or maybe the necklace, and in that case why she knew it was there and why she wanted the cello with it), you&#039;ll need to justify it. Lugging that thing around will seriously hamper her ability to get away, and to what end? What possible use does she have for it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;naked//</span><br />Um… Twilight showed up fully clothed. Don&#039;t go all Ponyfall on me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to keep//</span><br />Another extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes, her heart, her soul ware all the same//</span><br />I&#039;m assuming that&#039;s a typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The ups and downs show you&#039;re alive//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Y-Yeah//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway, you only do the first one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;maker//</span><br />You capitalized that earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;months….//</span><br />One too many dots there.<br /><br />I hit on most of the points I wanted to make in the detailed items, so just a few more.<br /><br />This writing is very dense and purple. Besides the stacking up of elements I already noted, it makes sentences ramble on long enough to where they lose focus. Both of those are definite issues at times. The purpleness is subjective. I will say it didn&#039;t bother me so much, but I&#039;m unusually tolerant of that. It will turn off a decent number of potential readers, though.<br /><br />I also touched on the plot problem I had with why Sunset Shimmer stole the cello. And you never hint at whether Octavia ever finds her necklace. There are also some odd deviations, like how the counterparts all have the same names. Why would Octavia adopt a different name, unless she&#039;d encountered that world&#039;s version of her, in which case why did nobody find it odd that they looked the same? And why would she adopt a name that doesn&#039;t really fit in that world?<br /><br />We&#039;re also left with a weak resolution and odd pacing. There&#039;s no big conflict that gets solved at the end—just a reunion that was obvious from the beginning. Some stories can survive with that, and I didn&#039;t think this was bad on that front, but just that it doesn&#039;t address the aftermath. Did Vinyl come through before or after Twilight, such that they know how to return? Is that the next battle, or are they just going to stay where they are? What kind of doesn&#039;t help you here is that you actually did have a stronger conflict earlier: their learning to appreciate each other. And I wouldn&#039;t at all recommend taking that out to make the ending stronger in contrast, since it serves another function of justifying their feelings for each other, something that too many romance stories skip over and expect us to take for granted.<br /><br />And a bit more aout the &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You had 95 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone. That is a huge amount for this word count. You really need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />So… you made me like a TaviScratch, which is no mean feat. The only things I&#039;d say really <i>have</i> to be fixed are the odd mechanical things, the nonsensical phrasings, get the emotional context less telly, and the dialogue punctuation/capitalization/attribution problems. I&#039;d also recommend you look at the plot points and element stacking/dense prose, but if they&#039;re not things you&#039;re willing to address, say so if/when you resubmit so I can let a different pre-reader evaluate it for those.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 79

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“I’m your daughter! I need you to love me Mother!”//

Missing comma for direct address. And why is this entire scene in bold? For that matter, why are your flashback scenes in italics? That'd be fine if they were quite short and worked into other scenes, but when you italicize an entire scene, there's really no point. Italics make something stand out, and when an entire scene stands out, nothing in it does. I gather that you may be playing with fonts to indicate time periods, but the narration is really the best place to do that.

>her eyelids opened to reveal jade green eyes and my suspicions were confirmed//

Missing comma between clauses. And hyphenate the compound modifier.

>filly hood//

Fillyhood, as in "childhood."

>we connected in very special way//

Missing word.

>Her bright jade filly eyes alight with excitement. Before I knew it, she teleported a daisy into the center of the room.//

Inconsistent verb tense.

>took on the form of a newly blossomed bud: which she floated over and dropped in front of me//

That's not how to use a colon.

>me. Age//

Extraneous space.

>“That’s not all Mother!” my daughter said triumphantly, “I can go the other way to!”//

I suspected before, but this is the first time I could tell for sure—you're not punctuating/capitalizing dialogue and attributions correctly. And to/too confusion here.

>Everypony in the Empire experienced the magical effect of the array at the same time, yet he had been turned to solid crystal, not unlike a statue!//

She's rather unemotional about this. In fact, she's pretty unemotional, period.

>I do not know my daughter//

Missing comma for direct address again. Unless you're literally saying she doesn't know her daughter…

>He has been drained of his life and love, he is no more.//

Comma splice.

>Anger welled up in her eyes.//

And when you do give us some of her emotion, it's blunt. Have a look at the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>He lived a very long life, much longer than mine//

Wait, what? He lived longer than her, yet he died first? That only makes sense if she's significantly younger, but you never explain it, so it just sounds weird.

>he had a flair for her//

Odd word choice.

>I caught her talking to him often; until one day she came forward with the truth and asked for my approval.//

Misused semicolon.

>I was not opposed in anyway//

In this sense, "any way" needs to be two words.

>to nullify the array' effect//

Typo.

>She looked as if she could not believe what she was hearing, “daughter, you must disable the array until we can investigate this further.”//

Capitalization, and your attribution has no speaking action.

>NO!//

Italics are preferred for emphasis.

>The door burst open and a large contingent of guards took position on both sides of the room.//

And just because she declare herself queen, all the guards instantly decide to obey her? This begs so much more explanation.

>clawing at the carpet//

How does she do that without any manner of digits?

I'll be very short here. The elephant in the room is that there's really no emotional investment here. The mother is more interested in listing events for me than telling me how she felt about any of it, and the odd time you do give us any emotional information, it's done in a blunt, telly manner. We get a little more from her daughter, but she's pretty bipolar, swinging erratically back and forth between ingratiating, saccharine, and enraged.

And how does Sombra figure into all this? Just curious.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b>“I’m your daughter! I need you to love me Mother!”</b>//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address. And why is this entire scene in bold? For that matter, why are your flashback scenes in italics? That&#039;d be fine if they were quite short and worked into other scenes, but when you italicize an entire scene, there&#039;s really no point. Italics make something stand out, and when an entire scene stands out, nothing in it does. I gather that you may be playing with fonts to indicate time periods, but the narration is really the best place to do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyelids opened to reveal jade green eyes and my suspicions were confirmed//</span><br />Missing comma between clauses. And hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;filly hood//</span><br />Fillyhood, as in &quot;childhood.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we connected in very special way//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her bright jade filly eyes alight with excitement. Before I knew it, she teleported a daisy into the center of the room.//</span><br />Inconsistent verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;took on the form of a newly blossomed bud: which she floated over and dropped in front of me//</span><br />That&#039;s not how to use a colon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;me. Age//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That’s not all Mother!” my daughter said triumphantly, “I can go the other way to!”//</span><br />I suspected before, but this is the first time I could tell for sure—you&#039;re not punctuating/capitalizing dialogue and attributions correctly. And to/too confusion here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everypony in the Empire experienced the magical effect of the array at the same time, yet he had been turned to solid crystal, not unlike a statue!//</span><br />She&#039;s rather unemotional about this. In fact, she&#039;s pretty unemotional, period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I do not know my daughter//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address again. Unless you&#039;re literally saying she doesn&#039;t know her daughter…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He has been drained of his life and love, he is no more.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Anger welled up in her eyes.//</span><br />And when you do give us some of her emotion, it&#039;s blunt. Have a look at the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He lived a very long life, much longer than mine//</span><br />Wait, what? He lived longer than her, yet he died first? That only makes sense if she&#039;s significantly younger, but you never explain it, so it just sounds weird.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he had a flair for her//</span><br />Odd word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I caught her talking to him often; until one day she came forward with the truth and asked for my approval.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was not opposed in anyway//</span><br />In this sense, &quot;any way&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to nullify the array&#039; effect//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked as if she could not believe what she was hearing, “daughter, you must disable the array until we can investigate this further.”//</span><br />Capitalization, and your attribution has no speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;NO!//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The door burst open and a large contingent of guards took position on both sides of the room.//</span><br />And just because she declare herself queen, all the guards instantly decide to obey her? This begs so much more explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;clawing at the carpet//</span><br />How does she do that without any manner of digits?<br /><br />I&#039;ll be very short here. The elephant in the room is that there&#039;s really no emotional investment here. The mother is more interested in listing events for me than telling me how she felt about any of it, and the odd time you do give us any emotional information, it&#039;s done in a blunt, telly manner. We get a little more from her daughter, but she&#039;s pretty bipolar, swinging erratically back and forth between ingratiating, saccharine, and enraged.<br /><br />And how does Sombra figure into all this? Just curious.<br />

author"s reply Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 80

>>129451
I appreciate the feedback. It shows at least one person has read my story! As far as your review is concerned, this is my reply.

I've made some grammatical changes in the story, as well as a few minor changes in content. I should add that this story was the adaption of another story that I wrote a few months ago that I couldn't get to "work" right.

Overall, I stand by the content. Writing is art after all. Would you dismiss Van Gogh's "The Night Cafe" because the pool table is out of perspective?

MM<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129451" onclick="return highlight('129451', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129451">&gt;&gt;129451</a><br />I appreciate the feedback. It shows at least one person has read my story! As far as your review is concerned, this is my reply.<br /><br />I&#039;ve made some grammatical changes in the story, as well as a few minor changes in content. I should add that this story was the adaption of another story that I wrote a few months ago that I couldn&#039;t get to &quot;work&quot; right.<br /><br />Overall, I stand by the content. Writing is art after all. Would you dismiss Van Gogh&#039;s &quot;The Night Cafe&quot; because the pool table is out of perspective?<br /><br />MM<br />

PsycholooCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 81

>>129427
Forgive me that something I wrote in the space of two days and never looked at again to keep myself from slitting my wrists offended you so greatly, O wise pre-reader.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129427" onclick="return highlight('129427', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129427">&gt;&gt;129427</a><br />Forgive me that something I wrote in the space of two days and never looked at again to keep myself from slitting my wrists offended you so greatly, O wise pre-reader.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 82

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:

I'd encourage you to separate the first two sentences as their own paragraph, as they're the only ones that actually have anything to say about the plot. And then decide if that's enough.

Story:

>except for the yellow eyes with red irises and the two mismatched horns//

This description is a bit obtrusive. With the perspective and the way this statement is rendered, it suggests that Twilight had to gather all this information before concluding who she sees, but she should recognize him instantly. Besides, her surprise is a bit dissonant with listing details like this.

>DISCORD!//

Italics are preferred over all caps or bold for emphasis, except in the case of Royal Canterlot Voice.

>Twilight was angry enough to swipe at him with her hoof, planning to grab him and drag him down from where he was hanging upside down from the rafters, but he swung backward out of her way with ease, pulled his head back up to the level of his body, and poofed, to reappear perched on the back of the chair at the desk on the other side of the room like some absurdly huge, misshapen crow.//

Mega-sentence ahoy! These can work in a stream-of-consciousness way, but in a more standard narration, they just tend to ramble on so long that they lose focus without having a stylistic reason for doing so. By the time I get to the end, I've forgotten what the beginning is about. It changes track so many times—if these are all important ideas to cover, let them each get some better focus by splitting this iver a few sentences. If they aren't all important, then cut them.

>she said angrily.//

Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. You seem to do okay in this department, but right at the beginning of a story is a bad place for telling, since you need to forge a connection with the characters pretty quickly.

>"Are there any dead ones?"//

And this conversation is starting to get a little talking-heads. I have a section on that up top, too. Inject a little more emotion into what they're saying. I imagine a nice expression on her face while she says this, and DIscord's reaction could be funny, but you're making me come up with all that. This is your job.

>….Maybe?//

Three dots in an ellipsis.

>While you're at it why don't you strike a dramatic pose?//

Missing a comma between the clauses.

>one speaking//

Extraneous space.

>Had she heard that right.//

It's a question, right?

>suddenly//

You're using "suddenly" and "abruptly" quite a bit recently. Besides getting repetitive, it suggests that you're relying a bit too much on the narration to create this effect. Unless you telegraph an occurrence, it's surprising by default, just because it appears at all. You can heighten that surprise by using a cutoff or a paragraph break, for instance.

>at the level of right next to her ear//

Awkwardly phrased.

>Are you going to bet your library on the belief that I wouldn't dare to do something randomly destructive for a stupid reason?//

And is he really willing to risk Fluttershy's friendship and Celestia's trust by antagonizing her?

>She wished Spike was here and not over Rarity's//

Missing a word, and when using hypothetical/wishful language, you need subjunctive mood. Fortunately, it's easy to use. "She wished Spike were here…" It's always "were."

>Swing batta!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>(or maybe a rock farm – Twilight had never been to one, so she wasn't sure how they differed from a quarry)//

Parentheses really work best when relaying articles of writing, or maybe in a first-person narration. This could better be conveyed with commas or dashes.

>of rock//

You can cut this, since you've already used "rock quarry" earlier in the sentence. That or remove the earlier instance of "rock."

>I don't even sleep and it put me to sleep.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>all the others, which was//

Subject/verb agreement.

>limbo'd//

I think "limboed" would be fine.

>chest, but he was suddenly so small he barely came up to her chest//

Watch the repetitive wording.

>long skinny//

Coordinate adjectives need a comma between them.

>bowlegs which bowed//

youdontsay.png

>His tongue licking her side.//

I have to think you meant for that to be a comma.

>me!//

You've been good about this so far, so it must just be an oversight, but when you have ! or ? on an italicized word, italicize it too.

>angle , so//

Extraneous space.

>instead of using pointing her horn//

Extraneous word.

>Twilight dropped onto four knees, kneeling//

Yes, that would be the definition.

>Discord's look of smug triumph changed to alarm.//

Yeah, you need to show me this stuff.

>Twilight lowered her head, letting her bangs fall over her eyes and narrowing them so much it would look through her mane like her eyes were closed.//

The last bit is just an irrelevant detail, and since Twilight is the perspective character, it speaks to an intent on her part to want it to look that way, but for no apparent reason.

>cheated!//

>priceless!//
>eternity!//
Same deal with the italicized punctuation.

>laughing uproariously//

It sticks in my head that you've used this phrasing eariler in the story. The more unusual word choice you make, the more likely it'll sound repetitive if you use it again.

>I'll give credit where credit is due, Discord. You make good ice cream.//

She's being awfully accommodating here, given how furious she was about the whole thing from the beginning. It's giving me mood whiplash. I can get that she's pretty self-satisfied here, which can smooth over her mood, but you need to give me that context. I'm not getting much of anything to indicate her mood.

>given my level of superiority//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with commas.

>elements//

You've been capitalizing this.

>He took the rest of his ice cream sundae, all scoops, and dumped the entire bowl over his mouth, eating all the ice cream in a more or less single large gulp.//

That basically says the same thing three times.

>prank!',//

Don't use the comma when there's other punctuation there.

>life or death//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

To me the two biggest problems with this story are the amount of telly language and the pacing. The number of times you pass up the opportunity to give me emotional context at all (talking heads falls under this as well) and how often you just spoon-feed me the emotions limit the degree to which I'm drawn into the story. And as to the pacing… the whole fight scene was extremely drawn out, the detailed actions pretty superfluous, and most of it ended up being unimportant. I can't help feeling like you could have summarized chunks of it without losing anything. That's really where the story dragged, but that could also be a result of the lack of an emotional reaction from Twilight toward what was happening.

I'll also say that the conflict was on the weak side, but not irredeemably so. Twilight makes an arrangement that I can't see her enjoying—she hasn't expressed a desire for a frenemy, after all. And while we do get an insight into Discord's character, it's not like either one of them actually changed as a result of their interaction. But that's more a comment than a criticism—there's enough here to be serviceable, and it's also an artifact of the story you've decided to tell. But I will encourage you to punch it up a bit. After the reveal, the story wraps up pretty quickly without anyone being affected by the outcome. Discord seems more matter-of-fact than happy, and Twilight is more bland than… I don't know what she should be. Terrified?

This story's not too far away. Just give me the emotional context that will connect me better with the characters and provide more meaning to the ending, and I could see this going up on the blog.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><br />I&#039;d encourage you to separate the first two sentences as their own paragraph, as they&#039;re the only ones that actually have anything to say about the plot. And then decide if that&#039;s enough.<br /><br />Story:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;except for the yellow eyes with red irises and the two mismatched horns//</span><br />This description is a bit obtrusive. With the perspective and the way this statement is rendered, it suggests that Twilight had to gather all this information before concluding who she sees, but she should recognize him instantly. Besides, her surprise is a bit dissonant with listing details like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;DISCORD!//</span><br />Italics are preferred over all caps or bold for emphasis, except in the case of Royal Canterlot Voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was angry enough to swipe at him with her hoof, planning to grab him and drag him down from where he was hanging upside down from the rafters, but he swung backward out of her way with ease, pulled his head back up to the level of his body, and poofed, to reappear perched on the back of the chair at the desk on the other side of the room like some absurdly huge, misshapen crow.//</span><br />Mega-sentence ahoy! These can work in a stream-of-consciousness way, but in a more standard narration, they just tend to ramble on so long that they lose focus without having a stylistic reason for doing so. By the time I get to the end, I&#039;ve forgotten what the beginning is about. It changes track so many times—if these are all important ideas to cover, let them each get some better focus by splitting this iver a few sentences. If they aren&#039;t all important, then cut them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she said angrily.//</span><br />Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. You seem to do okay in this department, but right at the beginning of a story is a bad place for telling, since you need to forge a connection with the characters pretty quickly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Are there any dead ones?&quot;//</span><br />And this conversation is starting to get a little talking-heads. I have a section on that up top, too. Inject a little more emotion into what they&#039;re saying. I imagine a nice expression on her face while she says this, and DIscord&#039;s reaction could be funny, but you&#039;re making me come up with all that. This is your job.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;….Maybe?//</span><br />Three dots in an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;While you&#039;re at it why don&#039;t you strike a dramatic pose?//</span><br />Missing a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one speaking//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Had she heard that right.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;suddenly//</span><br />You&#039;re using &quot;suddenly&quot; and &quot;abruptly&quot; quite a bit recently. Besides getting repetitive, it suggests that you&#039;re relying a bit too much on the narration to create this effect. Unless you telegraph an occurrence, it&#039;s surprising by default, just because it appears at all. You can heighten that surprise by using a cutoff or a paragraph break, for instance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at the level of right next to her ear//</span><br />Awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Are you going to bet your library on the belief that I wouldn&#039;t dare to do something randomly destructive for a stupid reason?//</span><br />And is he really willing to risk Fluttershy&#039;s friendship and Celestia&#039;s trust by antagonizing her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wished Spike was here and not over Rarity&#039;s//</span><br />Missing a word, and when using hypothetical/wishful language, you need subjunctive mood. Fortunately, it&#039;s easy to use. &quot;She wished Spike were here…&quot; It&#039;s always &quot;were.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Swing batta!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(or maybe a rock farm – Twilight had never been to one, so she wasn&#039;t sure how they differed from a quarry)//</span><br />Parentheses really work best when relaying articles of writing, or maybe in a first-person narration. This could better be conveyed with commas or dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of rock//</span><br />You can cut this, since you&#039;ve already used &quot;rock quarry&quot; earlier in the sentence. That or remove the earlier instance of &quot;rock.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t even sleep and it put me to sleep.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all the others, which was//</span><br />Subject/verb agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;limbo&#039;d//</span><br />I think &quot;limboed&quot; would be fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;chest, but he was suddenly so small he barely came up to her chest//</span><br />Watch the repetitive wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long skinny//</span><br />Coordinate adjectives need a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bowlegs which bowed//</span><br />youdontsay.png<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His tongue licking her side.//</span><br />I have to think you meant for that to be a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>me</i>!//</span><br />You&#039;ve been good about this so far, so it must just be an oversight, but when you have ! or ? on an italicized word, italicize it too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;angle , so//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;instead of using pointing her horn//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight dropped onto four knees, kneeling//</span><br />Yes, that would be the definition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discord&#039;s look of smug triumph changed to alarm.//</span><br />Yeah, you need to show me this stuff.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight lowered her head, letting her bangs fall over her eyes and narrowing them so much it would look through her mane like her eyes were closed.//</span><br />The last bit is just an irrelevant detail, and since Twilight is the perspective character, it speaks to an intent on her part to want it to look that way, but for no apparent reason.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>cheated</i>!//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>priceless</i>!//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>eternity</i>!//</span><br />Same deal with the italicized punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laughing uproariously//</span><br />It sticks in my head that you&#039;ve used this phrasing eariler in the story. The more unusual word choice you make, the more likely it&#039;ll sound repetitive if you use it again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;ll give credit where credit is due, Discord. You make good ice cream.//</span><br />She&#039;s being awfully accommodating here, given how furious she was about the whole thing from the beginning. It&#039;s giving me mood whiplash. I can get that she&#039;s pretty self-satisfied here, which can smooth over her mood, but you need to give me that context. I&#039;m not getting much of anything to indicate her mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;given my level of superiority//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off participial phrases with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;elements//</span><br />You&#039;ve been capitalizing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He took the rest of his ice cream sundae, all scoops, and dumped the entire bowl over his mouth, eating all the ice cream in a more or less single large gulp.//</span><br />That basically says the same thing three times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;prank!&#039;,//</span><br />Don&#039;t use the comma when there&#039;s other punctuation there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;life or death//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br />To me the two biggest problems with this story are the amount of telly language and the pacing. The number of times you pass up the opportunity to give me emotional context at all (talking heads falls under this as well) and how often you just spoon-feed me the emotions limit the degree to which I&#039;m drawn into the story. And as to the pacing… the whole fight scene was extremely drawn out, the detailed actions pretty superfluous, and most of it ended up being unimportant. I can&#039;t help feeling like you could have summarized chunks of it without losing anything. That&#039;s really where the story dragged, but that could also be a result of the lack of an emotional reaction from Twilight toward what was happening.<br /><br />I&#039;ll also say that the conflict was on the weak side, but not irredeemably so. Twilight makes an arrangement that I can&#039;t see her enjoying—she hasn&#039;t expressed a desire for a frenemy, after all. And while we do get an insight into Discord&#039;s character, it&#039;s not like either one of them actually changed as a result of their interaction. But that&#039;s more a comment than a criticism—there&#039;s enough here to be serviceable, and it&#039;s also an artifact of the story you&#039;ve decided to tell. But I will encourage you to punch it up a bit. After the reveal, the story wraps up pretty quickly without anyone being affected by the outcome. Discord seems more matter-of-fact than happy, and Twilight is more bland than… I don&#039;t know what she should be. Terrified?<br /><br />This story&#039;s not too far away. Just give me the emotional context that will connect me better with the characters and provide more meaning to the ending, and I could see this going up on the blog.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 83

>>129471
I would not, in fact, dismiss it for the pool table being out of perspective, because the pool table belongs there and fits with its surroundings.

>>129472

I was not offended by the story at all. I'm just saying I agree with an earlier criticism you received and decided to ignore. I guess I just don't understand why you explicitly asked WRITE for criticism and then again for that implicit in submitting to Equestria Daily, then bristled at actually getting it.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129471" onclick="return highlight('129471', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129471">&gt;&gt;129471</a><br />I would not, in fact, dismiss it for the pool table being out of perspective, because the pool table belongs there and fits with its surroundings.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129472" onclick="return highlight('129472', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129472">&gt;&gt;129472</a><br />I was not offended by the story at all. I&#039;m just saying I agree with an earlier criticism you received and decided to ignore. I guess I just don&#039;t understand why you explicitly asked WRITE for criticism and then again for that implicit in submitting to Equestria Daily, then bristled at actually getting it.<br />

PsycholooCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 84

>>129476
There's a difference between honest criticism and being a nitpicky dick for its own sake.
Running through and correcting everything when what I asked was "is this sufficient for you circlejerky dickwits", that's the latter.
Have no fear, between this and others like yourself I don't plan on pony-wording anytime soon. It's obvious I don't have any talent, why should I do what makes me happiest and makes me feel fulfilled.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129476" onclick="return highlight('129476', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129476">&gt;&gt;129476</a><br />There&#039;s a difference between honest criticism and being a nitpicky dick for its own sake. <br />Running through and correcting everything when what I asked was &quot;is this sufficient for you round-table discussiony dickwits&quot;, that&#039;s the latter.<br />Have no fear, between this and others like yourself I don&#039;t plan on pony-wording anytime soon. It&#039;s obvious I don&#039;t have any talent, why should I do what makes me happiest and makes me feel fulfilled.<br />

TheOneWhoLovesLyraCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 85

>>129478

Lolz. Another butthurt writer. Not sure why you bother asking for help if you're just gonna spit in its face.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129478" onclick="return highlight('129478', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129478">&gt;&gt;129478</a><br /><br />Lolz. Another butthurt writer. Not sure why you bother asking for help if you&#039;re just gonna spit in its face.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 86

>>129478
Would I have spent two hours reading your story and compiling notes on how to improve it, then post those notes in a place nobody else would see them if my intent was to insult you?

I have a feeling that if all I'd done is give you a flat "no," you'd b upset that you didn't know what needed to be fixed. So you can accept my help and write that much better the next time. Or maybe your way works fine, too.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129478" onclick="return highlight('129478', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129478">&gt;&gt;129478</a><br />Would I have spent two hours reading your story and compiling notes on how to improve it, then post those notes in a place nobody else would see them if my intent was to insult you?<br /><br />I have a feeling that if all I&#039;d done is give you a flat &quot;no,&quot; you&#039;d b upset that you didn&#039;t know what needed to be fixed. So you can accept my help and write that much better the next time. Or maybe your way works fine, too.<br />

PsycholooCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 87

>>129480
If you'd given a flat no I would have gone on my way.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129480" onclick="return highlight('129480', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129480">&gt;&gt;129480</a><br />If you&#039;d given a flat no I would have gone on my way.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 88

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Placing the large angel pony on top of the tree//

More a commentary than a problem with the story, but this makes me wonder what constitutes an angel in Equestria. Though they already named a rabbit that, so it doesn't conflict with canon.

>Placing the large angel pony on top of the tree, Applejack climbed back down the ladder while she blissfully hummed an old Hearth carol to herself.//

Okay, let's revisit this sentence. Participles imply concurrent action, so you have her placing the angel on top of the tree while she's climbing down. That doesn't work.

>to carry it back in to the basement//

I could see this if she were outside, but she's not, so… lose that "in" or change it to "down."

>The sun had begun to set over Equestria that was freshly covered in blanket of snow//

There's snow across all of Equestria? Seems unlikely, and the phrasing's off a bit, too.

>Reaching her hoof into the tree fetching her sister's present, she trotted it over and gleefully dropped it from her mouth into the stocking.//

Missing an "and." Without it, this says the tree was fetching the present. And you have the same synchronization problem with your participles again. She's reaching into the tree at the same time she's trotting over to the hearth. I suspect this will be a recurring issue.

>She treasured the ancient holiday's traditions faithfully observed throughout the generations before her;//

Misused semicolon. You don't have an independent clause after it. You're providing a clarification or definition here, so a colon would be appropriate.

>mistletoes//

That's generally used as a singular, collective term.

>But most of all, Applejack found joy in the spirit of friendship and giving that brought her family together even more intimately after a long year of hard work on the farm.//

There's a fine line here. You're pretty bluntly telling me how Applejack feels about all of this, but you're mitigating it some. The list of traditions you gave is a step in the right direction. Think along those lines here. Give me a couple of short examples here to make this come to life, so I can see it through Applejack's eyes instead of having to take the narrator's word for it.

>Ah' //

What in the world is that apostrophe for? What letters are you contracting?

>who, unbeknownst to her sister, was hiding under a couch in the opposite room.//

Insofar as the narrator is following Applejack around, she wouldn't know this. Now, you could be going for a very objective viewpoint, which is okay, but it makes the narrative less personal, which may not work as well for this story. That's your choice, but I can't help thinking that you're spoiling a surprise by telling me this now. If it's actually important, hold it for when it comes up later.

>She knew well what her sister was referring to.//

So you are taking on a pretty subjective narration then. Yeah, best not to tell me things Applejack couldn't know.

>ah//

And since this is a stand-in for "I," you'll need to capitalize it. That said, the reader knows how the Apple family talks, and they'll largely fill that in for you. Don't go overboard on using imitative spellings for their accent. All of the "Ah" and "ya" spellings are over the top.

>mah'//

Again, what possible purpose does that apostrophe serve?

>This was met with another sigh//

You're using quite a bit of passive voice, too. There are times it provides a valid shift of focus, but all it's doing here is sapping your sentences of action.

>appeased her heart//

Appeased? That's a really odd word choice.

>she shrugged//

How do you shrug a sentence? You need a speaking verb, or else don't use this as an attribution.

>called out to her grandmother from the doorway, who was at the stove//

You need to put the "who" clause right against "grandmother," or it sounds like the doorway is at the stove.

>Howdy Granny!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>has only increased in excitability and amiable silliness with her growing older//

Verb tense, and this is just awkwardly phrased. First, you can assume that readers will already know who Granny Smith is and what she's like. Second, this sentence just doesn't flow naturally. Does this sound like a sentence you might hear someone say, or that a movie voice-over guy might use? Even if you're using very fancy, flowery language, you need to make it sounds like natural speech.

>looked back at her granddaughter winked//

Missing word.

>Though slowed just a little bit in her mind as a result of her age, she was always aware of her granddaughter's pure intentions and understood her concerns.//

More head-hopping. Check out the section on that at the top of this thread.

>She is always delighted//

Another inconsistency in verb tense.

>frozen in joyful fear upon hearing her big sister looking for her in the room she was in//

You have redundant instances of "in," and just more head-hopping (within the same sentence, no less) and awkward phrasing. Read your story out loud. Does this sound like something you'd say if you were telling a story of something that had happened to you as a child?

>With all her excitement returned//

Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. You need to give me the evidence and get me to conclude she's excited, not just tell me she is.

>As Apple Bloom giggled wildly and struggled frantically to run away, her sister playfully grabbed her and tickled her awfully, as Apple Bloom howled with laughter and futilely attempted to free herself.//

It's repetitive to have two "as" clauses in the sentence like this, and that's not even accounting for the problems it causes with the timing of events.

>Despite it's struggle//

Its/it's confusion.

There's just more of the same, so I won't keep pointing out detailed items. The biggest things here are:

Telly language. You need to get us to engage with the characters more, and spoon-feeding us their emotions isn't the way to do that.

Perspectives. Your narrator isn't at all smooth is switching between characters, and I'm not sure that any of the switching is even necessary to the story.

Phrasing. The bulk of the narration just feels unnatural. I could't imagine a real person saying any of this. You have to keep up a good flow to the story, or the writing itself gets in the way. If I'm constantly stumbling over what I read, it just reminds me that I'm reading something and not immersed in a story.

The Apple family accent is overdone. You don't want that slowing down the reader at all.

Overload of "to be" verbs and passive voice. You have 118 instances of "was" alone. These are very boring verbs. You need to choose more active verbs.

Finally, everything is just over-explained. This is related to the telly language, but you spend so much time delving into and spelling out in great detail everyone's motivations and minutiae of trains of thought. You have to leave some of that up to the reader. Subtlety is your friend. You have to give enough evidence to clue the reader in, but then stand back and let him draw his own conclusions. Give your readers some credit.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Placing the large angel pony on top of the tree//</span><br />More a commentary than a problem with the story, but this makes me wonder what constitutes an angel in Equestria. Though they already named a rabbit that, so it doesn&#039;t conflict with canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Placing the large angel pony on top of the tree, Applejack climbed back down the ladder while she blissfully hummed an old Hearth carol to herself.//</span><br />Okay, let&#039;s revisit this sentence. Participles imply concurrent action, so you have her placing the angel on top of the tree while she&#039;s climbing down. That doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to carry it back in to the basement//</span><br />I could see this if she were outside, but she&#039;s not, so… lose that &quot;in&quot; or change it to &quot;down.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sun had begun to set over Equestria that was freshly covered in blanket of snow//</span><br />There&#039;s snow across all of Equestria? Seems unlikely, and the phrasing&#039;s off a bit, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Reaching her hoof into the tree fetching her sister&#039;s present, she trotted it over and gleefully dropped it from her mouth into the stocking.//</span><br />Missing an &quot;and.&quot; Without it, this says the tree was fetching the present. And you have the same synchronization problem with your participles again. She&#039;s reaching into the tree at the same time she&#039;s trotting over to the hearth. I suspect this will be a recurring issue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She treasured the ancient holiday&#039;s traditions faithfully observed throughout the generations before her;//</span><br />Misused semicolon. You don&#039;t have an independent clause after it. You&#039;re providing a clarification or definition here, so a colon would be appropriate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mistletoes//</span><br />That&#039;s generally used as a singular, collective term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But most of all, Applejack found joy in the spirit of friendship and giving that brought her family together even more intimately after a long year of hard work on the farm.//</span><br />There&#039;s a fine line here. You&#039;re pretty bluntly telling me how Applejack feels about all of this, but you&#039;re mitigating it some. The list of traditions you gave is a step in the right direction. Think along those lines here. Give me a couple of short examples here to make this come to life, so I can see it through Applejack&#039;s eyes instead of having to take the narrator&#039;s word for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah&#039; //</span><br />What in the world is that apostrophe for? What letters are you contracting?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who, unbeknownst to her sister, was hiding under a couch in the opposite room.//</span><br />Insofar as the narrator is following Applejack around, she wouldn&#039;t know this. Now, you could be going for a very objective viewpoint, which is okay, but it makes the narrative less personal, which may not work as well for this story. That&#039;s your choice, but I can&#039;t help thinking that you&#039;re spoiling a surprise by telling me this now. If it&#039;s actually important, hold it for when it comes up later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She knew well what her sister was referring to.//</span><br />So you <i>are</i> taking on a pretty subjective narration then. Yeah, best not to tell me things Applejack couldn&#039;t know.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ah//</span><br />And since this is a stand-in for &quot;I,&quot; you&#039;ll need to capitalize it. That said, the reader knows how the Apple family talks, and they&#039;ll largely fill that in for you. Don&#039;t go overboard on using imitative spellings for their accent. All of the &quot;Ah&quot; and &quot;ya&quot; spellings are over the top.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mah&#039;//</span><br />Again, what possible purpose does that apostrophe serve?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This was met with another sigh//</span><br />You&#039;re using quite a bit of passive voice, too. There are times it provides a valid shift of focus, but all it&#039;s doing here is sapping your sentences of action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;appeased her heart//</span><br />Appeased? That&#039;s a really odd word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she shrugged//</span><br />How do you shrug a sentence? You need a speaking verb, or else don&#039;t use this as an attribution.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;called out to her grandmother from the doorway, who was at the stove//</span><br />You need to put the &quot;who&quot; clause right against &quot;grandmother,&quot; or it sounds like the doorway is at the stove.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Howdy Granny!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;has only increased in excitability and amiable silliness with her growing older//</span><br />Verb tense, and this is just awkwardly phrased. First, you can assume that readers will already know who Granny Smith is and what she&#039;s like. Second, this sentence just doesn&#039;t flow naturally. Does this sound like a sentence you might hear someone say, or that a movie voice-over guy might use? Even if you&#039;re using very fancy, flowery language, you need to make it sounds like natural speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked back at her granddaughter winked//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Though slowed just a little bit in her mind as a result of her age, she was always aware of her granddaughter&#039;s pure intentions and understood her concerns.//</span><br />More head-hopping. Check out the section on that at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She is always delighted//</span><br />Another inconsistency in verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;frozen in joyful fear upon hearing her big sister looking for her in the room she was in//</span><br />You have redundant instances of &quot;in,&quot; and just more head-hopping (within the same sentence, no less) and awkward phrasing. Read your story out loud. Does this sound like something you&#039;d say if you were telling a story of something that had happened to you as a child?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With all her excitement returned//</span><br />Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. You need to give me the evidence and get me to conclude she&#039;s excited, not just tell me she is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As Apple Bloom giggled wildly and struggled frantically to run away, her sister playfully grabbed her and tickled her awfully, as Apple Bloom howled with laughter and futilely attempted to free herself.//</span><br />It&#039;s repetitive to have two &quot;as&quot; clauses in the sentence like this, and that&#039;s not even accounting for the problems it causes with the timing of events.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Despite it&#039;s struggle//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br />There&#039;s just more of the same, so I won&#039;t keep pointing out detailed items. The biggest things here are:<br /><br />Telly language. You need to get us to engage with the characters more, and spoon-feeding us their emotions isn&#039;t the way to do that.<br /><br />Perspectives. Your narrator isn&#039;t at all smooth is switching between characters, and I&#039;m not sure that any of the switching is even necessary to the story.<br /><br />Phrasing. The bulk of the narration just feels unnatural. I could&#039;t imagine a real person saying any of this. You have to keep up a good flow to the story, or the writing itself gets in the way. If I&#039;m constantly stumbling over what I read, it just reminds me that I&#039;m reading something and not immersed in a story.<br /><br />The Apple family accent is overdone. You don&#039;t want that slowing down the reader at all.<br /><br />Overload of &quot;to be&quot; verbs and passive voice. You have 118 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone. These are very boring verbs. You need to choose more active verbs.<br /><br />Finally, everything is just over-explained. This is related to the telly language, but you spend so much time delving into and spelling out in great detail everyone&#039;s motivations and minutiae of trains of thought. You have to leave some of that up to the reader. Subtlety is your friend. You have to give enough evidence to clue the reader in, but then stand back and let him draw his own conclusions. Give your readers some credit.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 89

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Bringing the detestable object in front of her eyes, her other hoof slowly began to unscrew the cap.//

Look carefully at what this says. The other hoof is bringing the object in front of her eyes. This doesn't make sense.

>As the cap was removed, a deafening silence was released into the bathroom.//

Are you sure you mean "as" and not something like "after"? I don't see how the silence would be released while the cap is still coming off.

>As she washed away every last trace of that horrid paste//

This is the third straight sentence with an "as" clause. Besides the unintentional synchronization problems that overusing this structure can cause, it just gets your writing in a rut to see that over and over again. Of course, not all of them will be used in this sense, but I count 55 instances of the word in your story. That's a lot for this length. It suggests you're relying on that sentence structure too much, which creates a repetitive feel.

>liquid magma that would boil her skin off, and freezing cold ice-water siphoned directly from the north pole//

Unnecessary comma, and you're dangerously close to a meme there.

>she delicately stepped inside the rushing waterfall, and opened her mouth//

Check out the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>an impressive array//

Be careful expressing opinions. If the narrator's not deep in a character's perspective, such that he's expressing that character's opinion, you generally want to keep him neutral. And this wouldn't be Octavia's opinion, since it's normal for her.

>octavia//

I assume you can see the problem.

>small, white dollop of innocent looking//

You don't need that comma, as they're hierarchical adjectives, and don't forget the hyphen in your compound modifier.

>gorgeous, mulberry eyes//

Hierarchical adjectives again, and watch that narrative opinion again.

>off the an intricately detailed //

Extraneous word.

>Eventually, she lifted up a comb, and scrupulously straightened out her mane, curling her bangs around a precisely calculated curve//

I've passed over a few of these, but you've got a few participles that are misplaced modifiers. By their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the mane is curling her bangs.

>She trotted out of the bathroom, picking up a white collar with a pink bow-tie//

Same thing. It sounds like the bathroom is picking up these things. And "bow tie."

>neck, until it rested upon her neck//

Watch the word repetition.

>on the front-page again//

Another inexplicable hyphenation.

>as it was lowered to the floor//

I don't see a need for the passive voice here, and it's sapping the action from your sentence.

>Another quiet sound filled the living room as the case was gently closed and pushed across the soft velvet of the couch. A bow was drawn, carefully, across the strings.//

More unnecessary passive voice. Consider how it's detaching her from these actions. She's your focus (and only) character—cutting that connection just leaves these actions as strangely disembodied.

>a grand hall. Octavia's band was performing at one of the most famous concert halls in Canterlot.//

And as famous as it is, the best our narrator can muster is "a grand hall."

>Frederic sighed. "Where's Harpo?"//

This conversation is a tad talking heads. There's a section on that at the top of this thread, too. The few character actions are all overly terse to the point of being uninteresting, and only about half suggest an emotion. While, I'm overjoyed that you're not being telly here, I do need to get some emotional context.

>3//

Write out numbers, unless they're exceedingly long.

>iterations of measures 40-50 of the first movement, and even during their playthrough of the coda//

Okay, I'm a music guy, and I have to take issue with some of the terminology here. "Iteration" is an odd term to use for this. Depending on the shade of meaning you want and the timing, perhaps something like verse, reprisal, or recapitulation might work. And any movement could potentially have a coda, so don't presume that "the" coda automatically means the last one.

>matter-of-factly//

You're getting a bit telly here. A facial expression might sell this better than bluntly giving me her mood.

>'till//

Accepted spellings are til, 'til, and till.

>band//

This group isn't really something I'd call a band. Probably something like a quartet, chamber ensemble, or some such. Band implies more pop music or a larger group of winds only or winds and percussion. And given what they're playing, your use of words like "wash" and "ripple" really only reference the slow part of that piece. You're not going to evoke any imagery of the up-tempo part?

>a lone painter caught her eye//

Outdoor painting and music during Hearth's Warming? Sounds awfully cold. Having done it, I can say it is possible, but it is miserable, and it's tough to keep your instrument in tune.

>she quickly trotted back towards the stallion, intent on solving the mystery for good//

And another misplaced modifier. It sounds like the stallion wants to solve the mystery.

>stall - which was more like a collection of various belongings than a stall - Octavia//

Please use proper dashes.

>Octavia hesitated//

That's not a speaking action.

>amatuer//

Spelling.

>french//

Capitalize.

>envelopes//

As a verb, "envelops."

>Beauty Brass’//

If you're married to this, fine, but the few style guides that endorse this practice have mostly bowed to common usage. Traditionally, a singular term always takes the full apostrophe-s.

>in an expression of shock//

Telling again. Watch it. You can get away with it sometimes, but this is a pretty big emotional moment.

>Yeah, right.//

Well… why does she do it, then?

>The stallion nodded in understanding.//

Besides being telly, the "in understanding" is empty filler that's completely redundant with the nod.

>the ladies restroom//

Missing an apostrophe.

>Octavia cast one last sidelong glance at the stallion who had unwittingly stolen her heart before vanishing into the ladies restroom.//

Besides the repetitive use of "ladies [sic] restroom," this really sounds like the stallion was the one who went in there since the "who" clause is right there with him.

>out of place stallion//

Another compound modifier needing hyphenation.

>to-do-list//

The second hyphen shouldn't be there. Now, look over the last couple paragraphs. She's sad. Her actions say so. But the narration, which is deeply in her perspective, is decidedly stoic, even slightly humorous. There's a serious disconnect as to what kind of mood you're trying to create.

>She could find the shop where he worked, and perhaps they could find//

Watch the repetition again.

>trudging//

Just used that word two sentences ago. The more unusual a word, the less you can get away with reusing it.

>had began//

had begun

>The pain that radiated up her foreleg startled her.//

Again, this is coming across as a bit sterile. Let the narration reflect her mood. If it startled her, if should startle the narrator as well, since you're using an objective viewpoint.

>like glittering drops of sadness//

Since that's exactly what they are, it's not a particularly effective simile.

>she found herself//

That's a phrase commonly overused by inexperienced writers, and I'm starting to notice how often you use it.

>Trotting along the cobblestone path, Octavia's quiet whimpering was the only sound that broke the silence of the night.//

A genuine dangling participle. Who's trotting? It can't be Octavia, since she doesn't even appear in the sentence. Only her whimpering does, but it can't trot.

>towards the stars, listening to the silence of the night, interrupted only by her own sniffling//

Beware stacking up descriptive elements like this. It can make sentences clunky. And stacking participles can be risky, as it can be ambiguous whether they're nested. For example, does "interrupted…" describe "night," "silence," or "stars"?

>Certainly she had done plenty of stupid things, it was the nature of being a foal.//

Comma splice.

>She'd gone to the academy because that's where everypony who studied music went to.//

Axe that last "to."

>No, she had to be whatever they wanted her to be.//

This is the part I don't follow. Certainly, she has free time to play or compose what she likes. In the absence of direct evidence from canon, I have to assume Equestria isn't too different from Earth, and musicians frequently cross genres without any sort of derogatory treatment. If you want to paint an Equestria that's substantially different, you have to get me there.

>they could go buck themselves//

This really smacks of fan service, particularly since canon use of "buck" has no profane connotations. You don't have to get cutesy to make your point.

And looking at your A/N, I realize you really, really want to make a societal point here, but I'm nowhere close to being sold that dating this stallion would be "throwing her career away."

Summing-up time.

Mechanically, there were a few comma flubs and a bunch of places where hyphens needed to be or shouldn't have been. A few obtrusive examples of passive voice, an over-reliance on "as" clauses and participial phrases with their attendant timing issues and misplaced modifiers. These didn't kill the story, but they need attention. Similarly, look at how many "to be" verbs you use. For the "was" form alone, I counted 136. That's a lot for this word count. These are inherently boring verbs. You ought to be choosing more active verbs.

You went into present tense briefly, and it's unclear to me whether that was a stylistic choice. It could have worked, but it needs to create an effect, and since it was an isolated incident, I couldn't pick up on a thematic purpose for it. Frankly, it felt more like an oversight.

I wasn't getting as much emotion from the story as I'd like. At times, Octavia shows no reaction to things that should be affecting her, at others, that reaction is told bluntly instead of shown to me, and the narrator rarely feels tuned into her in these moments.

Last item: I got quite a bit of dissonance between her love interest and her disdain of high society. You keep hammering me over the head about how bad the aristocracy is, and it felt like I read the same screed three or four times, to the point this starts to read like a personal soapbox than a pony story. It really ends up overshadowing the love interest, too. A common problem in shipping stories is that we're presented with the happy couple and immediately expected to care. We need to see some interaction, history, proof that these characters have chemistry so we'll become invested in their relationship. So go back to the scene where they first meet, the paragraph that starts: "They talked for almost an hour…" You gloss over a lot of their interaction in summary. There's not a lot here to paint a picture, if you'll pardon the reference. Give me more detail here, make it obvious how they feel about each other, show me what thoughts run through her head as she spends time with him. You need to draw me into this moment, as it sets up everything that follows. Put her emotion, her thrill, her giddiness, her joy on full display here, and it'll bring the whole story alive.

As to not tagging this story as shipping… well, I'm on the fence. Less than half the story is spent on the romance, yet it's what drives everything that happens. If it were my story, I'd use that tag, particularly considering the advice I just gave you, but I'll leave that up to your discretion.

I actually liked this story. Not that that's required—a good story is a good story, whether or not I like it—but I think you can make this light up with a little more attention. Give this another whirl and submit again when you're ready. I'd like to be able to post it on the blog.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bringing the detestable object in front of her eyes, her other hoof slowly began to unscrew the cap.//</span><br />Look carefully at what this says. The other hoof is bringing the object in front of her eyes. This doesn&#039;t make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the cap was removed, a deafening silence was released into the bathroom.//</span><br />Are you sure you mean &quot;as&quot; and not something like &quot;after&quot;? I don&#039;t see how the silence would be released while the cap is still coming off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she washed away every last trace of that horrid paste//</span><br />This is the third straight sentence with an &quot;as&quot; clause. Besides the unintentional synchronization problems that overusing this structure can cause, it just gets your writing in a rut to see that over and over again. Of course, not all of them will be used in this sense, but I count 55 instances of the word in your story. That&#039;s a lot for this length. It suggests you&#039;re relying on that sentence structure too much, which creates a repetitive feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;liquid magma that would boil her skin off, and freezing cold ice-water siphoned directly from the north pole//</span><br />Unnecessary comma, and you&#039;re dangerously close to a meme there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she delicately stepped inside the rushing waterfall, and opened her mouth//</span><br />Check out the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an impressive array//</span><br />Be careful expressing opinions. If the narrator&#039;s not deep in a character&#039;s perspective, such that he&#039;s expressing that character&#039;s opinion, you generally want to keep him neutral. And this wouldn&#039;t be Octavia&#039;s opinion, since it&#039;s normal for her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;octavia//</span><br />I assume you can see the problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;small, white dollop of innocent looking//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that comma, as they&#039;re hierarchical adjectives, and don&#039;t forget the hyphen in your compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gorgeous, mulberry eyes//</span><br />Hierarchical adjectives again, and watch that narrative opinion again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;off the an intricately detailed //</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Eventually, she lifted up a comb, and scrupulously straightened out her mane, curling her bangs around a precisely calculated curve//</span><br />I&#039;ve passed over a few of these, but you&#039;ve got a few participles that are misplaced modifiers. By their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the mane is curling her bangs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trotted out of the bathroom, picking up a white collar with a pink bow-tie//</span><br />Same thing. It sounds like the bathroom is picking up these things. And &quot;bow tie.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;neck, until it rested upon her neck//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on the front-page again//</span><br />Another inexplicable hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as it was lowered to the floor//</span><br />I don&#039;t see a need for the passive voice here, and it&#039;s sapping the action from your sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Another quiet sound filled the living room as the case was gently closed and pushed across the soft velvet of the couch. A bow was drawn, carefully, across the strings.//</span><br />More unnecessary passive voice. Consider how it&#039;s detaching her from these actions. She&#039;s your focus (and only) character—cutting that connection just leaves these actions as strangely disembodied.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a grand hall. Octavia&#039;s band was performing at one of the most famous concert halls in Canterlot.//</span><br />And as famous as it is, the best our narrator can muster is &quot;a grand hall.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Frederic sighed. &quot;Where&#039;s Harpo?&quot;//</span><br />This conversation is a tad talking heads. There&#039;s a section on that at the top of this thread, too. The few character actions are all overly terse to the point of being uninteresting, and only about half suggest an emotion. While, I&#039;m overjoyed that you&#039;re not being telly here, I do need to get some emotional context.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;3//</span><br />Write out numbers, unless they&#039;re exceedingly long.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;iterations of measures 40-50 of the first movement, and even during their playthrough of the coda//</span><br />Okay, I&#039;m a music guy, and I have to take issue with some of the terminology here. &quot;Iteration&quot; is an odd term to use for this. Depending on the shade of meaning you want and the timing, perhaps something like verse, reprisal, or recapitulation might work. And any movement could potentially have a coda, so don&#039;t presume that &quot;the&quot; coda automatically means the last one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;matter-of-factly//</span><br />You&#039;re getting a bit telly here. A facial expression might sell this better than bluntly giving me her mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;till//</span><br />Accepted spellings are til, &#039;til, and till.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;band//</span><br />This group isn&#039;t really something I&#039;d call a band. Probably something like a quartet, chamber ensemble, or some such. Band implies more pop music or a larger group of winds only or winds and percussion. And given what they&#039;re playing, your use of words like &quot;wash&quot; and &quot;ripple&quot; really only reference the slow part of that piece. You&#039;re not going to evoke any imagery of the up-tempo part?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a lone painter caught her eye//</span><br />Outdoor painting and music during Hearth&#039;s Warming? Sounds awfully cold. Having done it, I can say it is possible, but it is miserable, and it&#039;s tough to keep your instrument in tune.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she quickly trotted back towards the stallion, intent on solving the mystery for good//</span><br />And another misplaced modifier. It sounds like the stallion wants to solve the mystery.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stall - which was more like a collection of various belongings than a stall - Octavia//</span><br />Please use proper dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia hesitated//</span><br />That&#039;s not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;amatuer//</span><br />Spelling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;french//</span><br />Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;envelopes//</span><br />As a verb, &quot;envelops.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Beauty Brass’//</span><br />If you&#039;re married to this, fine, but the few style guides that endorse this practice have mostly bowed to common usage. Traditionally, a singular term always takes the full apostrophe-s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in an expression of shock//</span><br />Telling again. Watch it. You can get away with it sometimes, but this is a pretty big emotional moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, <i>right</i>.//</span><br />Well… why does she do it, then?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stallion nodded in understanding.//</span><br />Besides being telly, the &quot;in understanding&quot; is empty filler that&#039;s completely redundant with the nod.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the ladies restroom//</span><br />Missing an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia cast one last sidelong glance at the stallion who had unwittingly stolen her heart before vanishing into the ladies restroom.//</span><br />Besides the repetitive use of &quot;ladies [sic] restroom,&quot; this really sounds like the stallion was the one who went in there since the &quot;who&quot; clause is right there with him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;out of place stallion//</span><br />Another compound modifier needing hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to-do-list//</span><br />The second hyphen shouldn&#039;t be there. Now, look over the last couple paragraphs. She&#039;s sad. Her actions say so. But the narration, which is deeply in her perspective, is decidedly stoic, even slightly humorous. There&#039;s a serious disconnect as to what kind of mood you&#039;re trying to create.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could find the shop where he worked, and perhaps they could find//</span><br />Watch the repetition again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trudging//</span><br />Just used that word two sentences ago. The more unusual a word, the less you can get away with reusing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;had began//</span><br />had begun<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pain that radiated up her foreleg startled her.//</span><br />Again, this is coming across as a bit sterile. Let the narration reflect her mood. If it startled her, if should startle the narrator as well, since you&#039;re using an objective viewpoint.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like glittering drops of sadness//</span><br />Since that&#039;s exactly what they are, it&#039;s not a particularly effective simile.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she found herself//</span><br />That&#039;s a phrase commonly overused by inexperienced writers, and I&#039;m starting to notice how often you use it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Trotting along the cobblestone path, Octavia&#039;s quiet whimpering was the only sound that broke the silence of the night.//</span><br />A genuine dangling participle. Who&#039;s trotting? It can&#039;t be Octavia, since she doesn&#039;t even appear in the sentence. Only her whimpering does, but it can&#039;t trot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;towards the stars, listening to the silence of the night, interrupted only by her own sniffling//</span><br />Beware stacking up descriptive elements like this. It can make sentences clunky. And stacking participles can be risky, as it can be ambiguous whether they&#039;re nested. For example, does &quot;interrupted…&quot; describe &quot;night,&quot; &quot;silence,&quot; or &quot;stars&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Certainly she had done plenty of stupid things, it was the nature of being a foal.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She&#039;d gone to the academy because that&#039;s where everypony who studied music went to.//</span><br />Axe that last &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No, she had to be whatever they wanted her to be.//</span><br />This is the part I don&#039;t follow. Certainly, she has free time to play or compose what she likes. In the absence of direct evidence from canon, I have to assume Equestria isn&#039;t too different from Earth, and musicians frequently cross genres without any sort of derogatory treatment. If you want to paint an Equestria that&#039;s substantially different, you have to get me there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they could go buck themselves//</span><br />This really smacks of fan service, particularly since canon use of &quot;buck&quot; has no profane connotations. You don&#039;t have to get cutesy to make your point.<br /><br />And looking at your A/N, I realize you really, really want to make a societal point here, but I&#039;m nowhere close to being sold that dating this stallion would be &quot;throwing her career away.&quot;<br /><br />Summing-up time.<br /><br />Mechanically, there were a few comma flubs and a bunch of places where hyphens needed to be or shouldn&#039;t have been. A few obtrusive examples of passive voice, an over-reliance on &quot;as&quot; clauses and participial phrases with their attendant timing issues and misplaced modifiers. These didn&#039;t kill the story, but they need attention. Similarly, look at how many &quot;to be&quot; verbs you use. For the &quot;was&quot; form alone, I counted 136. That&#039;s a lot for this word count. These are inherently boring verbs. You ought to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />You went into present tense briefly, and it&#039;s unclear to me whether that was a stylistic choice. It could have worked, but it needs to create an effect, and since it was an isolated incident, I couldn&#039;t pick up on a thematic purpose for it. Frankly, it felt more like an oversight.<br /><br />I wasn&#039;t getting as much emotion from the story as I&#039;d like. At times, Octavia shows no reaction to things that should be affecting her, at others, that reaction is told bluntly instead of shown to me, and the narrator rarely feels tuned into her in these moments.<br /><br />Last item: I got quite a bit of dissonance between her love interest and her disdain of high society. You keep hammering me over the head about how bad the aristocracy is, and it felt like I read the same screed three or four times, to the point this starts to read like a personal soapbox than a pony story. It really ends up overshadowing the love interest, too. A common problem in shipping stories is that we&#039;re presented with the happy couple and immediately expected to care. We need to see some interaction, history, proof that these characters have chemistry so we&#039;ll become invested in their relationship. So go back to the scene where they first meet, the paragraph that starts: &quot;They talked for almost an hour…&quot; You gloss over a lot of their interaction in summary. There&#039;s not a lot here to paint a picture, if you&#039;ll pardon the reference. Give me more detail here, make it obvious how they feel about each other, show me what thoughts run through her head as she spends time with him. You need to draw me into this moment, as it sets up everything that follows. Put her emotion, her thrill, her giddiness, her joy on full display here, and it&#039;ll bring the whole story alive.<br /><br />As to not tagging this story as shipping… well, I&#039;m on the fence. Less than half the story is spent on the romance, yet it&#039;s what drives everything that happens. If it were my story, I&#039;d use that tag, particularly considering the advice I just gave you, but I&#039;ll leave that up to your discretion.<br /><br />I actually liked this story. Not that that&#039;s required—a good story is a good story, whether or not I like it—but I think you can make this light up with a little more attention. Give this another whirl and submit again when you&#039;re ready. I&#039;d like to be able to post it on the blog.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Jan 14th, 2014 21:55</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 90

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement. However, there wasn't much to point out for this story, so I was pretty thorough.

>their heads held down in shame//

The "in shame" is pretty telly and redundant with the action.

>That’s all!?//

It's more common to italicize a ! or ? that goes with an italicized word.

>With them two gone//

Typo.

>she turned to face Twilight, jumping in place just a bit as she saw her friend//

A common danger of participles: misplaced modifiers. Who's jumping? Most writers would mean for Dash to be, but the grammatical assumption is Twilight. In any case, this one's perfectly ambiguous.

>as if visibly swallowing her pride//

The problem with making a simile for a visual effect on her is that she's the perspective character, so it's oddly detached for her to think about herself like this.

>I-don’t-see-the-problem expression//

While the description is cute, it does nothing to help me picture it. I don't know what this would look like.

>“But Cloudsdale is at its apogee from Ponyville?”//

Huh? Canon maps imply its location is fixed.

>it’ll be night and I won’t be able to pull them all by myself in time to start the snowfall//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>a look of complete disbelief//

Yeah, you need some help with telling. Read over the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Spike asked, finally getting a chance to add his own thoughts into the conversation//

Wait, when did he show up? For that matter, how did Twilight get there? It's peculiar to have your characters pop up out of nowhere.

>And with that//

Phrases like this, in which the narration refers to itself, are a bad idea.

>2//

Wait, these are your scene markers? They're a bit… stealthy. I'd encourage you to use a longer string of characters or the bbcode [hr], and leave a blank line after it.

>itself - she//

Use a proper dash, please.

>an eyebrow raised in curiosity//

More of that telling.

>her tone a mix of professional and wonder//

That's pretty telly too. Tone's a tricky thing to get at—you'll probably have an easier time of describing her actions.

>giggled with amusement//

No.

>laughing stock//

One word.

>blinked - in all of the years she’s had//

Dash and verb tense.

>“ground”//

Really odd for her to put these quotes on here when it'd be the norm for her.

>she let her body finally slump with the weariness it felt//

You could drive this home with some more vivid and extensive description here. It'd bring this part alive.

>* * *//

Give me line breaks around this so it actually stands out.

>A soft pop!//

Don't do onomatopoeia in the narration. It's a valid word. Just use it normally.

>reaching over the bed and nuding a snoring lump on the bed//

Repetition of bed, and a very unfortunate typo.

>a look of perplexion upon her face//

Still no.

>with a worried frown//

*sigh*

>so sure in herself//

The phrasing I've always heard is "sure of herself," but if this is one you've heard where you are, then go with it.

>distances - from//

Maybe these are just en dashes that aren't translating to FiMFiction well, but they sure look like hyphens to me.

>her tone one of defeat//

C'mon. Show this through her body language. it's how you connect me to the character. You get me to put myself in her mindset and fiure her out.

>Twilight protested, setting herself firmly on the cloud and closing her eyes.//

You're falling into a repetitive sentence pattern. Look at your dialogue attributions. They're almost always "Speech," she said, <participial phrase or absolute phrase>. It's getting in a rut.

>A warm pulsing sensation slid up her horn as she concentrated, imagining herself, Rainbow Dash and their blanket of clouds and then imagining them above Ponyville.//

Watch your perspective. You started the scene in Rainbow Dash's head, so why are you wandering over th Twilight's now? Look at the section on head-hopping at the top of this thread. The important questions are: Is this information necessary? Could have have still been related through Dash's perspective based on emotional cues she sees? Or could the prior part have been converted to Twilight's perspective? It may be that this is warranted, but give it some thought.

>but this time you’re making an object disappear and reappear instantaneously. But it has to be in that bubble.//

The back-to-back "but" clauses give a double-negative feel.

>Rainbow Dash blinked, trying to make sense of everything.//

And see, you're just as quickly back in Dash's head. If you couldn't stay with Twilight more than a couple paragraphs, it probably wasn't that important.

>“You mean when Pinkie Pie decides to be obnoxious? Yeah.”//

By this point, the conversation is getting a little "talking heads." There's a section on this at the top of the thread, too.

>snowfall - they//

Dash.

>Dash offered a small chuckle that had not even a hint of amusement to Twilight’s ears.//

And you're back in Twilight's perspective again… The early parts of the story didn't do this. Here's another spot where this would be a lot more powerful if you painted me a picture of her body language and facial expression.

>Peppermint Hot Apple Cider//

Why is this capitalized?

>There was more to it than that, Twilight knew.//

And one paragraph later, back in Twilight's head. See how jerky this is?

>She could hear the disappointment in Rainbow Dash’s voice//

Yes, but she's looking right at her! What does she see?

>finishing her mug in one final gulp//

"Finishing" and "final" are pretty redundant.

>her eyebrow raised with curiosity and suspicion//

Please… no more…

>shaking her head in amused disbelief

*weeps openly*

Kidding aside, this was a pretty good story. Most of the fixes needed are easy ones. Fix the telling, the repetitive dialogue attributions, the few hyphen/dash issues, and please space out the scene breaks.

Those shouldn't bee too hard. Ironing out the perspective shifts will take some more thought, however. And the last thing I want to bring up is the underwhelming end. It finally snowed after all that trouble, and… nobody was that excited about it, except Pinkie. Everyone else just threw some offhand comment out, and Applejack seemed to be about to get on her soapbox about class warfare. It's weird. Things just fizzled out. And then you close on a line that seems like it was trying to be funny, but was just left hanging there. And if it's really that close to bedtime, why are none of them showing any signs of being tired? Why aren't the ones who are known to have family spending this holiday with them? And those poor weather factory workers who had to pull a late shift on Hearth's Warming Eve…

I get that you had a conflict built up, but you defused it rather than resolved it. What bad thing would have happened if it had never snowed? Really, nothing, since everyone was resigned to that without any apparent ill effects. It had no teeth. Make it so that it matters how things turn out.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement. However, there wasn&#039;t much to point out for this story, so I was pretty thorough.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;their heads held down in shame//</span><br />The &quot;in shame&quot; is pretty telly and redundant with the action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>That’s all</i>!?//</span><br />It&#039;s more common to italicize a ! or ? that goes with an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With them two gone//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she turned to face Twilight, jumping in place just a bit as she saw her friend//</span><br />A common danger of participles: misplaced modifiers. Who&#039;s jumping? Most writers would mean for Dash to be, but the grammatical assumption is Twilight. In any case, this one&#039;s perfectly ambiguous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as if visibly swallowing her pride//</span><br />The problem with making a simile for a visual effect on her is that she&#039;s the perspective character, so it&#039;s oddly detached for her to think about herself like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I-don’t-see-the-problem expression//</span><br />While the description is cute, it does nothing to help me picture it. I don&#039;t know what this would look like.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“But Cloudsdale is at its apogee from Ponyville?”//</span><br />Huh? Canon maps imply its location is fixed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’ll be night and I won’t be able to pull them all by myself in time to start the snowfall//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a look of complete disbelief//</span><br />Yeah, you need some help with telling. Read over the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike asked, finally getting a chance to add his own thoughts into the conversation//</span><br />Wait, when did he show up? For that matter, how did Twilight get there? It&#039;s peculiar to have your characters pop up out of nowhere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And with that//</span><br />Phrases like this, in which the narration refers to itself, are a bad idea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;2//</span><br />Wait, these are your scene markers? They&#039;re a bit… stealthy. I&#039;d encourage you to use a longer string of characters or the bbcode [hr], and leave a blank line after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;itself - she//</span><br />Use a proper dash, please.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an eyebrow raised in curiosity//</span><br />More of that telling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her tone a mix of professional and wonder//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty telly too. Tone&#039;s a tricky thing to get at—you&#039;ll probably have an easier time of describing her actions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;giggled with amusement//</span><br />No.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laughing stock//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blinked - in all of the years she’s had//</span><br />Dash and verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“ground”//</span><br />Really odd for her to put these quotes on here when it&#039;d be the norm for her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she let her body finally slump with the weariness it felt//</span><br />You could drive this home with some more vivid and extensive description here. It&#039;d bring this part alive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;* * *//</span><br />Give me line breaks around this so it actually stands out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A soft <i>pop!</i>//</span><br />Don&#039;t do onomatopoeia in the narration. It&#039;s a valid word. Just use it normally.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reaching over the bed and nuding a snoring lump on the bed//</span><br />Repetition of bed, and a very unfortunate typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a look of perplexion upon her face//</span><br />Still no.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a worried frown//</span><br />*sigh*<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so <i>sure</i> in herself//</span><br />The phrasing I&#039;ve always heard is &quot;sure of herself,&quot; but if this is one you&#039;ve heard where you are, then go with it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;distances - from//</span><br />Maybe these are just en dashes that aren&#039;t translating to FiMFiction well, but they sure look like hyphens to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her tone one of defeat//</span><br />C&#039;mon. Show this through her body language. it&#039;s how you connect me to the character. You get me to put myself in her mindset and fiure her out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight protested, setting herself firmly on the cloud and closing her eyes.//</span><br />You&#039;re falling into a repetitive sentence pattern. Look at your dialogue attributions. They&#039;re almost always &quot;Speech,&quot; she said, &lt;participial phrase or absolute phrase&gt;. It&#039;s getting in a rut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A warm pulsing sensation slid up her horn as she concentrated, imagining herself, Rainbow Dash and their blanket of clouds and then imagining them above Ponyville.//</span><br />Watch your perspective. You started the scene in Rainbow Dash&#039;s head, so why are you wandering over th Twilight&#039;s now? Look at the section on head-hopping at the top of this thread. The important questions are: Is this information necessary? Could have have still been related through Dash&#039;s perspective based on emotional cues she sees? Or could the prior part have been converted to Twilight&#039;s perspective? It may be that this is warranted, but give it some thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but this time you’re making an object disappear and reappear instantaneously. But it has to be in that bubble.//</span><br />The back-to-back &quot;but&quot; clauses give a double-negative feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash blinked, trying to make sense of everything.//</span><br />And see, you&#039;re just as quickly back in Dash&#039;s head. If you couldn&#039;t stay with Twilight more than a couple paragraphs, it probably wasn&#039;t that important.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You mean when Pinkie Pie decides to be obnoxious? Yeah.”//</span><br />By this point, the conversation is getting a little &quot;talking heads.&quot; There&#039;s a section on this at the top of the thread, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;snowfall - they//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash offered a small chuckle that had not even a hint of amusement to Twilight’s ears.//</span><br />And you&#039;re back in Twilight&#039;s perspective again… The early parts of the story didn&#039;t do this. Here&#039;s another spot where this would be a lot more powerful if you painted me a picture of her body language and facial expression.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Peppermint Hot Apple Cider//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was more to it than that, Twilight knew.//</span><br />And one paragraph later, back in Twilight&#039;s head. See how jerky this is?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could hear the disappointment in Rainbow Dash’s voice//</span><br />Yes, but she&#039;s looking right at her! What does she <i>see?</i><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;finishing her mug in one final gulp//</span><br />&quot;Finishing&quot; and &quot;final&quot; are pretty redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyebrow raised with curiosity and suspicion//</span><br />Please… no more…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shaking her head in amused disbelief</span><br />*weeps openly*<br /><br />Kidding aside, this was a pretty good story. Most of the fixes needed are easy ones. Fix the telling, the repetitive dialogue attributions, the few hyphen/dash issues, and please space out the scene breaks.<br /><br />Those shouldn&#039;t bee too hard. Ironing out the perspective shifts will take some more thought, however. And the last thing I want to bring up is the underwhelming end. It finally snowed after all that trouble, and… nobody was that excited about it, except Pinkie. Everyone else just threw some offhand comment out, and Applejack seemed to be about to get on her soapbox about class warfare. It&#039;s weird. Things just fizzled out. And then you close on a line that seems like it was trying to be funny, but was just left hanging there. And if it&#039;s really that close to bedtime, why are none of them showing any signs of being tired? Why aren&#039;t the ones who are known to have family spending this holiday with them? And those poor weather factory workers who had to pull a late shift on Hearth&#039;s Warming Eve…<br /><br />I get that you had a conflict built up, but you defused it rather than resolved it. What bad thing would have happened if it had never snowed? Really, nothing, since everyone was resigned to that without any apparent ill effects. It had no teeth. Make it so that it matters how things turn out.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 91

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>There's a new bar in town; Raised In A Barn//
Misused semicolon. You're giving a definition or clarification, so go with a colon.

>And, Vinyl//

There's no reason for that comma.

Story:
>"What? I don't have a drinking problem!"//
>Berry Punch was appalled at the accusation of her having a drinking problem.//
Well… yes. You're basically repeating what the quote already said. And then you're conveying some emotional context in a very blunt fashion. It's better to present me with her body language, facial expression, etc, and get me to interpret her emotion. See the section at the top of this thread on show versus tell. Also, you never do tell me what's going on in this scene. Where is she? Who's talking to her? And if Berry's somewhere discussing a drinking problem, why in the world does she think it'll be a good idea to work in a bar?

>The mare - whose color she could not remember after that night, nor the color of her mane, just her icy blue eyes - she was speaking to replied://

Please use proper dashes, not hyphens. And why are you placing the speech in a different paragraph than the attribution?

>clearly exasperated//

Show me this. Writing's so much more powerful when you get me into the characters' heads and make me identify with them. By telling, you short-circuit that.

>Okay dear!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>Berry Punch made a quick gallop for the knob of her cottage//

The cottage presumably has more than one door… and even if not, that just sounds weird.

>Vinyl waved the thing in her hand.//

Wait, what? She has a hand?

You're inconsistent about italicizing question marks and exclamation marks that go with italicized words.

>"Plus, I'll make sure you don't drink too much," - Vinyl winked - "And even if you do end up having a hangover, I'll look after Piña Colada."//

Here's how to do an aside in a quote. Pay attention to the capitalization and punctuation.
"Plus, I'll make sure you don't drink too much—" Vinyl winked "—and even if you do end up having a hangover, I'll look after Piña Colada."

>"Lyra's sick and Bon-Bon has a voice acting gig."//

These conversations get dangerously close to talking heads at times. There's a section on that up top, too.

>"Already coming," Vinyl went into puppy-dog mode.//

There's no speaking action in your attribution.

>"It was good, mama," Piña Colada poured some milk into a cup.//

Same thing.

>Oreo's//

No apostrophe here. And why are you using human brands? Does it really matter that it's specifically Oreos?

>letting her mind wonder//

You probably meant "wander."

>Berry Punch put opened the door//

Typos.

>Berry Punch did not make much money at the shoe factory she worked at and did not have much money for luxuries.//

Repetitive wording, and you really have to find a more elegant way of working expository information into the narration without just dropping it on me.

>Taste Of Neighsa was the Neighsan restaurant Sweet And Sour worked at.//

Same thing re: inelegant exposition.

>"People love the new Sweet And Sour Chicken,"//

Is that implying they eat chicken or a "Scootaloo is a chicken" reference? Either way, just no.

>Freshman//

Why is this capitalized?

>she heard a knock on her door and Berry Punch walked down and opened the door//

Missing comma between the clauses and repetitive use of "door."

>her hair was pulled back into a French braid and she was wearing a green skirt with a flower tucked into her hair.//

Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions, too.

>THAT//

Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis.

>The walk to Raised In A Barn//

Why does the size of the indent change for the rest of the story here?

>it said 'Raised In A Barn'//

Given that we already know that to be the bar's name, I don't see the point in saying so.

>An Hour And Several Drinks Later…//

Why don't you actually show us some of this?

>Extrovert//

That is a really, really, really strange name for a pony.

>and would be due any day now//

I see you did your research on the gestation period of ponies, but she was already showing at the beginning of that eleven months.

I guess I'm kind of at a loss as to what I can say succinctly about this. It's very telly, for oe. It's also incredibly rushed. None of the scenes give the reader any breathing room to get to know the characters or watch them react to what's happening. It just all blows by so quickly. There's also not much in the way of conflict. A few events happened, but what was the importance of it all? What was at stake? There needs to be something that a main character wants and a struggle to get it, with the implication that something bad will happen if she doesn't get it. That's really the foundation for writing, except for a pure character piece, but those are hard to write well.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s a new bar in town; Raised In A <i>Bar</i>n//</span><br />Misused semicolon. You&#039;re giving a definition or clarification, so go with a colon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And, Vinyl//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason for that comma.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;What? I don&#039;t have a drinking problem!&quot;//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berry Punch was appalled at the accusation of her having a drinking problem.//</span><br />Well… yes. You&#039;re basically repeating what the quote already said. And then you&#039;re conveying some emotional context in a very blunt fashion. It&#039;s better to present me with her body language, facial expression, etc, and get me to interpret her emotion. See the section at the top of this thread on show versus tell. Also, you never do tell me what&#039;s going on in this scene. Where is she? Who&#039;s talking to her? And if Berry&#039;s somewhere discussing a drinking problem, why in the world does she think it&#039;ll be a good idea to work in a bar?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mare - whose color she could not remember after that night, nor the color of her mane, just her icy blue eyes - she was speaking to replied://</span><br />Please use proper dashes, not hyphens. And why are you placing the speech in a different paragraph than the attribution?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;clearly exasperated//</span><br />Show me this. Writing&#039;s so much more powerful when you get me into the characters&#039; heads and make me identify with them. By telling, you short-circuit that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Okay dear!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berry Punch made a quick gallop for the knob of her cottage//</span><br />The cottage presumably has more than one door… and even if not, that just sounds weird.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Vinyl waved the thing in her hand.//</span><br />Wait, what? She has a hand?<br /><br />You&#039;re inconsistent about italicizing question marks and exclamation marks that go with italicized words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Plus, I&#039;ll make sure you don&#039;t drink too much,&quot; - Vinyl winked - &quot;And even if you do end up having a hangover, I&#039;ll look after Piña Colada.&quot;//</span><br />Here&#039;s how to do an aside in a quote. Pay attention to the capitalization and punctuation.<br />&quot;Plus, I&#039;ll make sure you don&#039;t drink too much—&quot; Vinyl winked &quot;—and even if you do end up having a hangover, I&#039;ll look after Piña Colada.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Lyra&#039;s sick and Bon-Bon has a voice acting gig.&quot;//</span><br />These conversations get dangerously close to talking heads at times. There&#039;s a section on that up top, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Already coming,&quot; Vinyl went into puppy-dog mode.//</span><br />There&#039;s no speaking action in your attribution.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;It was good, mama,&quot; Piña Colada poured some milk into a cup.//</span><br />Same thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oreo&#039;s//</span><br />No apostrophe here. And why are you using human brands? Does it really matter that it&#039;s specifically Oreos?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;letting her mind wonder//</span><br />You probably meant &quot;wander.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berry Punch put opened the door//</span><br />Typos.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berry Punch did not make much money at the shoe factory she worked at and did not have much money for luxuries.//</span><br />Repetitive wording, and you really have to find a more elegant way of working expository information into the narration without just dropping it on me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Taste Of Neighsa was the Neighsan restaurant Sweet And Sour worked at.//</span><br />Same thing re: inelegant exposition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;People love the new Sweet And Sour Chicken,&quot;//</span><br />Is that implying they eat chicken or a &quot;Scootaloo is a chicken&quot; reference? Either way, just no.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Freshman</i>//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she heard a knock on her door and Berry Punch walked down and opened the door//</span><br />Missing comma between the clauses and repetitive use of &quot;door.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her hair was pulled back into a French braid and she was wearing a green skirt with a flower tucked into her hair.//</span><br />Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;THAT//</span><br />Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The walk to Raised In A Barn//</span><br />Why does the size of the indent change for the rest of the story here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it said &#039;Raised In A Barn&#039;//</span><br />Given that we already know that to be the bar&#039;s name, I don&#039;t see the point in saying so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>An Hour And Several Drinks Later…</i>//</span><br />Why don&#039;t you actually show us some of this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Extrovert//</span><br />That is a really, really, really strange name for a pony.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and would be due any day now//</span><br />I see you did your research on the gestation period of ponies, but she was already showing at the beginning of that eleven months.<br /><br />I guess I&#039;m kind of at a loss as to what I can say succinctly about this. It&#039;s very telly, for oe. It&#039;s also incredibly rushed. None of the scenes give the reader any breathing room to get to know the characters or watch them react to what&#039;s happening. It just all blows by so quickly. There&#039;s also not much in the way of conflict. A few events happened, but what was the importance of it all? What was at stake? There needs to be something that a main character wants and a struggle to get it, with the implication that something bad will happen if she doesn&#039;t get it. That&#039;s really the foundation for writing, except for a pure character piece, but those are hard to write well.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 92

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>new found//
One word.

>King and Queens monstrous army//

Missing apostrophe.

>Or will they witness the destruction of their home, first hand?//

Unnecessary comma and "firsthand." Also note that rhetorical questions in a synopsis are pretty weak.

Story:
>The raging heat is felt across its dirt streets//
Given that we have no characters yet, who's feeling the heat?

>darkened sky is revealed by plumes of smoke//

Smoke reveals the sky? And dark sky at that? I have no idea what you mean.

>Her dark indigo mane waves in the thermals that now plague the air and her wings ache with every furious beat.//

See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>She lands near the centre square of the town weakened and out of breath.//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>smoke filled air//

Missing a hyphen in your compound descriptor.

>“Hello.” She calls.//

Also see the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization.

>as she begins to feel emotions of anxiety and loss//

Yow. It doesn't get much more telly than that. I also prescribe the section on show versus tell.

>Without warning her emotions take control of her as, she in unable to stop crying//

Some botched syntax there.

>The young Alicorns eyes//

Missing apostrophe.

>As the Alicorn begins to focus on the ruins, her heartbeat quickens, soon it is the only sound she can hear.//

Comma splice.

>lone walls//

The fact that "walls" is plural kind of defeats the use of "lone."

>its limbs flex and bends//

Subject/verb agreement.

>a might bellow//

Typo.

>Their wings bearing the silver glint that broke her mesmerized state.//

Fragment and close repetition of the "silver glint."

>One of them turns; her brilliant green eyes fixated on the shocked princess.//

Misused semicolon.

I've noticed by now that it's incredibly rare for you to start a sentence with anything but the subject.

>More footsteps begin to echo in the town.//

This is the 15th of 35 instances of "begin" in your story. Besides being a nearly useless verb, you really need to avoid repetition like this. It gets your writing in a rut.

>Gale jokingly jests.//

That's pretty redundant.

Why are none of these ponies surprised by the changelings' size? Besides Chrysalis, they've never seen one any bigger than a normal pony.

There's really no plot or characterization to speak of yet, so I'm mostly looking at the mechanics, and I've already spelled out what the consistent problems are. You're also well below the required word count for a submission.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;new found//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;King and Queens monstrous army//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Or will they witness the destruction of their home, first hand?//</span><br />Unnecessary comma and &quot;firsthand.&quot; Also note that rhetorical questions in a synopsis are pretty weak.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The raging heat is felt across its dirt streets//</span><br />Given that we have no characters yet, who&#039;s feeling the heat?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;darkened sky is revealed by plumes of smoke//</span><br />Smoke reveals the sky? And dark sky at that? I have no idea what you mean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her dark indigo mane waves in the thermals that now plague the air and her wings ache with every furious beat.//</span><br />See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She lands near the centre square of the town weakened and out of breath.//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;smoke filled air//</span><br />Missing a hyphen in your compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Hello.” She calls.//</span><br />Also see the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she begins to feel emotions of anxiety and loss//</span><br />Yow. It doesn&#039;t get much more telly than that. I also prescribe the section on show versus tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without warning her emotions take control of her as, she in unable to stop crying//</span><br />Some botched syntax there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The young Alicorns eyes//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the Alicorn begins to focus on the ruins, her heartbeat quickens, soon it is the only sound she can hear.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lone walls//</span><br />The fact that &quot;walls&quot; is plural kind of defeats the use of &quot;lone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its limbs flex and bends//</span><br />Subject/verb agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a might bellow//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Their wings bearing the silver glint that broke her mesmerized state.//</span><br />Fragment and close repetition of the &quot;silver glint.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One of them turns; her brilliant green eyes fixated on the shocked princess.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br />I&#039;ve noticed by now that it&#039;s incredibly rare for you to start a sentence with anything but the subject.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;More footsteps begin to echo in the town.//</span><br />This is the 15th of 35 instances of &quot;begin&quot; in your story. Besides being a nearly useless verb, you really need to avoid repetition like this. It gets your writing in a rut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gale jokingly jests.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty redundant.<br /><br />Why are none of these ponies surprised by the changelings&#039; size? Besides Chrysalis, they&#039;ve never seen one any bigger than a normal pony.<br /><br />There&#039;s really no plot or characterization to speak of yet, so I&#039;m mostly looking at the mechanics, and I&#039;ve already spelled out what the consistent problems are. You&#039;re also well below the required word count for a submission.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 93

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Queen Leisha watched over her kingdom proudly. She smiled as her subjects pranced around in small happy jumps of excitement.//

And you're already off on the wrong foot. The beginning of a story is an especially bad place to use telly language, since you need to make your characters immediately engaging. Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>The little fillies and colts loved her, and played with her whenever she was out walking-which was quite often.//

Please use a proper dash. And also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>"My Queen?" A guard asked from behind.//

…and the section on dialogue punctuation/capitalization.

>Yes Commander Silver?//

Missing comma for direct address.

>the up most respect//

utmost

>Leshias'//

Misplaced apostrophe.

>5th//

Spell out numbers unless they're quite lon.

I'm getting very muted emotional responses from everyone except the queen, and hers are completely out of context—she keeps wondering what she's done, but we don't see any physical evidence of how it makes her feel.

>He look at her//

Verb form.

>The silver fur looks familiar… But there are a ton of silver coated stallions in the kingdom. His light green eyes are different though. I've only known 1 silver coated green eyed pony in the kingdom. He must be him.//

This lacks in subtlety. It's just leading me by the hand through what I'm supposed to think. That's not a good way to keep the reader interested.

>No No No.//

Capitalization.

>That sure shut her up.//

And why the sudden jump into his perspective? Have a look at the section oon head hopping, too.

>"Who are you?//

Some uneven indentations in this chapter.

>Your in the kingdom of jewels.//

Your/you're confusion.

>That is why I helped this kingdom!!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>It felt as if something had began to corrupt her heart.//

So show me! Don't make me take the narrator's word for it.

>Not to long ago//

To/too confusion.

>After weeks of meals that would make your stomach turn over//

Why is your narrator addressing me?

>E-Excuse//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter unless it's a proper noun.

>~Pearl.//

~ is not proper punctuation.

>Pearl was sitting there smiling, and finally said,

>
>"Glad your feeling better."
Why are you putting a paragraph break between the attribution and dialogue?

Okay, there's just more of the same. Besides the consistent mechanical problems, the emotional context either isn't there or is done without any subtlety, and I keep encountering awkwardly worded sentences. You also have repetitive sentence structures. Look how rarely you begin a sentence with anything but the subject, and look how many of those opening words are the same. And look at how many "to be" verbs you use. There are very boring verbs. You need to choose more active language. There were 34 instances of "was" alone in the last chapter. There's just a lot that needs to be addressed with the writing itself before I can even look at characterization and plot.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Queen Leisha watched over her kingdom proudly. She smiled as her subjects pranced around in small happy jumps of excitement.//</span><br />And you&#039;re already off on the wrong foot. The beginning of a story is an especially bad place to use telly language, since you need to make your characters immediately engaging. Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The little fillies and colts loved her, and played with her whenever she was out walking-which was quite often.//</span><br />Please use a proper dash. And also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;My Queen?&quot; A guard asked from behind.//</span><br />…and the section on dialogue punctuation/capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes Commander Silver?//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the up most respect//</span><br />utmost<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Leshias&#039;//</span><br />Misplaced apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;5th//</span><br />Spell out numbers unless they&#039;re quite lon.<br /><br />I&#039;m getting very muted emotional responses from everyone except the queen, and hers are completely out of context—she keeps wondering what she&#039;s done, but we don&#039;t see any physical evidence of how it makes her feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He look at her//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The silver fur looks familiar… But there are a ton of silver coated stallions in the kingdom. His light green eyes are different though. I&#039;ve only known 1 silver coated green eyed pony in the kingdom. He must be him.//</span><br />This lacks in subtlety. It&#039;s just leading me by the hand through what I&#039;m supposed to think. That&#039;s not a good way to keep the reader interested.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No No No.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That sure shut her up.//</span><br />And why the sudden jump into his perspective? Have a look at the section oon head hopping, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Who are you?//</span><br />Some uneven indentations in this chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your in the kingdom of jewels.//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That is why I helped this kingdom!!!//</span><br />One exclamation mark is plenty.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It felt as if something had began to corrupt her heart.//</span><br />So show me! Don&#039;t make me take the narrator&#039;s word for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not to long ago//</span><br />To/too confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After weeks of meals that would make your stomach turn over//</span><br />Why is your narrator addressing me?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;E-Excuse//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter unless it&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;~Pearl.//</span><br />~ is not proper punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pearl was sitting there smiling, and finally said,</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Glad your feeling better.&quot;</span><br />Why are you putting a paragraph break between the attribution and dialogue?<br /><br />Okay, there&#039;s just more of the same. Besides the consistent mechanical problems, the emotional context either isn&#039;t there or is done without any subtlety, and I keep encountering awkwardly worded sentences. You also have repetitive sentence structures. Look how rarely you begin a sentence with anything but the subject, and look how many of those opening words are the same. And look at how many &quot;to be&quot; verbs you use. There are very boring verbs. You need to choose more active language. There were 34 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone in the last chapter. There&#039;s just a lot that needs to be addressed with the writing itself before I can even look at characterization and plot.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 94

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Their Queen//
Why is "Their" capitalized? And you didn't capitalize "Queen" the other time you used it.

Story:
>egg sacks//
egg sacs

>Queen Chrysalis sat in the middle of the swarm, looking smugly forward at the platform and the five ordinary changeling drones that sat upon it.//

Participles can often be misplaced modifiers. By their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the swarm is looking smugly forward.

>Off to the right, one of the changelings watching the proceedings transformed into a gray stallion, “Those changelings are terrible. I hope the Princesses do something about them.”//

You've punctuated this like an attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>One to the left turned into a unicorn mare, “Don't worry sweetie, those changelings are gone.//

And you're doing it again.

>in an ever more disgusted face//

Don't just tell me she's disgusted. Describe how she acts and appears so that I deduce her disgust. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. For that matter, also read the part about talking heads, as this conversation has shown no emotional context for anyone by Chrysalis.

>as We wish to institute an incentive-based pay scale, as We feel it is more effective//

Watch stacking up the "as" clauses like that. It makes your writing repetitive.

>A-Are you sure?//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a proper noun.

>you know, the basics//

Wait, why is the narrator talking to me?

>7th//

Write out numbers this short.

>Pandemonium enveloped the room.//

I… don't even know where to start. There's playing it dry, but this is to the extreme. And I have no idea what's happening. You're asking me to invent the funny scene for you, but this kind of humor comes from surprise, and I'm not going to be surprised by something I thought of myself.

>Can thou believest that?!//

Why does she speak in this manner for the grand total of one sentence? And at least get it right. "Canst thou believe that?"

>The five looked at Luna's detailed invasion map. They glanced around before focusing their attention back onto the map. A few changelings poked their head out of the chamber and looked down the tunnels for any signs of the alicorns. Several other changelings walked up to the map nonchalantly. The five once again looked around, as if the alicorns would return at any moment.//

Your story suffers from a lot of this. You're just listing action after action. There's no emotion to it, no zing, no atmosphere. You can only get away with that during an action scene.

>It's uses could greatly enhance Us.//

Its/it's confusion.

>The five ignored her adorable antics and stood up//

What's your perspective here? If they're ignoring her, then they wouldn't notice it was adorable. So who is it that the narrator's speaking for when he judges it so?

>green slim//

Typo.

>exoskeletons//

Okay, let's go back to the part where one of them was holding a bag of frozen peas. How do you bruise an exoskeleton?

>fifteen hundred page//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors.

>That's beneath me,.//

Typo.

>Los Pegasus//

Iirc, the writers said this was a play on Las Vegas, not Los Angeles.

A/N:
>who's//
whose

First: this was funny. Not the kind of thing I could read multiple times and get a laugh out of it each time, but for a one-time read, the jokes were more hit than miss.

However, there is quite a bit of work to be done still. The emotional investment isn't there, and it manifests in a couple of the things I pointed out: telly language and listing actions at the expense of emotional content. So you've got spots throughout the spectrum. Action without emotion is boring. Telly emotion can keep up interest, but it's not engaging or memorable.

Now, a word about your use of colors and fonts. The tentacle creature's font was difficult to read. There are places where it obscures the words on the line above or below it as well. This is a bad thing. But backing off from that specific example, I never saw a need for it. I know why you did it. I'm just saying it didn't work. I'm guessing you like Pratchett and the way he uses a special font for Death. Why that works is because he goes into quite the description the first time he uses it in any given book of how that speech sounds. And with that explanation, the font becomes meaningful. When I see it again, I automatically hear it the way Pratchett described it. You don't. Small-caps green font only means the hive is speaking, as far as I know, but that's already obvious, so it adds nothing. When Twilight switches from black speech to purple, how am I supposed to hear that any differently? You'd have to describe how it sounds different, and then given that it's only a few sentences, it's not really worth running with that gimmick, because the explanation alone would already give me what I need t hear it right. Bottom line: the only one of these that I'd think could ever work is the hive's speech, and even then, you need to tell me up front what it signifies about the sound or how it's perceived so that it actually has a use.

As to the mechanics, you seem to be laboring under the delusion that any random action sitting against speech can be joined to it with a comma, sometimes even on both ends. To the former: only if it's a speaking action, and to the latter: no.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Their Queen//</span><br />Why is &quot;Their&quot; capitalized? And you didn&#039;t capitalize &quot;Queen&quot; the other time you used it.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;egg sacks//</span><br />egg sacs<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Queen Chrysalis sat in the middle of the swarm, looking smugly forward at the platform and the five ordinary changeling drones that sat upon it.//</span><br />Participles can often be misplaced modifiers. By their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like the swarm is looking smugly forward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Off to the right, one of the changelings watching the proceedings transformed into a gray stallion, “Those changelings are terrible. I hope the Princesses do something about them.”//</span><br />You&#039;ve punctuated this like an attribution, but there&#039;s no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One to the left turned into a unicorn mare, “Don&#039;t worry sweetie, those changelings are gone.//</span><br />And you&#039;re doing it again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in an ever more disgusted face//</span><br />Don&#039;t just tell me she&#039;s disgusted. Describe how she acts and appears so that I deduce her disgust. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. For that matter, also read the part about talking heads, as this conversation has shown no emotional context for anyone by Chrysalis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as We wish to institute an incentive-based pay scale, as We feel it is more effective//</span><br />Watch stacking up the &quot;as&quot; clauses like that. It makes your writing repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A-Are you sure?//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you know, the basics//</span><br />Wait, why is the narrator talking to me?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;7th//</span><br />Write out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pandemonium enveloped the room.//</span><br />I… don&#039;t even know where to start. There&#039;s playing it dry, but this is to the extreme. And I have no idea what&#039;s happening. You&#039;re asking me to invent the funny scene for you, but this kind of humor comes from surprise, and I&#039;m not going to be surprised by something I thought of myself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Can thou believest that?!//</span><br />Why does she speak in this manner for the grand total of one sentence? And at least get it right. &quot;Canst thou believe that?&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The five looked at Luna&#039;s detailed invasion map. They glanced around before focusing their attention back onto the map. A few changelings poked their head out of the chamber and looked down the tunnels for any signs of the alicorns. Several other changelings walked up to the map nonchalantly. The five once again looked around, as if the alicorns would return at any moment.//</span><br />Your story suffers from a lot of this. You&#039;re just listing action after action. There&#039;s no emotion to it, no zing, no atmosphere. You can only get away with that during an action scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s uses could greatly enhance Us.//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The five ignored her adorable antics and stood up//</span><br />What&#039;s your perspective here? If they&#039;re ignoring her, then they wouldn&#039;t notice it was adorable. So who is it that the narrator&#039;s speaking for when he judges it so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;green slim//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;exoskeletons//</span><br />Okay, let&#039;s go back to the part where one of them was holding a bag of frozen peas. How do you bruise an exoskeleton?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fifteen hundred page//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That&#039;s beneath me,.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Los Pegasus//</span><br />Iirc, the writers said this was a play on Las Vegas, not Los Angeles.<br /><br />A/N:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who&#039;s//</span><br />whose<br /><br />First: this was funny. Not the kind of thing I could read multiple times and get a laugh out of it each time, but for a one-time read, the jokes were more hit than miss.<br /><br />However, there is quite a bit of work to be done still. The emotional investment isn&#039;t there, and it manifests in a couple of the things I pointed out: telly language and listing actions at the expense of emotional content. So you&#039;ve got spots throughout the spectrum. Action without emotion is boring. Telly emotion can keep up interest, but it&#039;s not engaging or memorable.<br /><br />Now, a word about your use of colors and fonts. The tentacle creature&#039;s font was difficult to read. There are places where it obscures the words on the line above or below it as well. This is a bad thing. But backing off from that specific example, I never saw a need for it. I know why you did it. I&#039;m just saying it didn&#039;t work. I&#039;m guessing you like Pratchett and the way he uses a special font for Death. Why that works is because he goes into quite the description the first time he uses it in any given book of how that speech sounds. And with that explanation, the font becomes meaningful. When I see it again, I automatically hear it the way Pratchett described it. You don&#039;t. Small-caps green font only means the hive is speaking, as far as I know, but that&#039;s already obvious, so it adds nothing. When Twilight switches from black speech to purple, how am I supposed to hear that any differently? You&#039;d have to describe how it sounds different, and then given that it&#039;s only a few sentences, it&#039;s not really worth running with that gimmick, because the explanation alone would already give me what I need t hear it right. Bottom line: the only one of these that I&#039;d think could ever work is the hive&#039;s speech, and even then, you need to tell me up front what it signifies about the sound or how it&#039;s perceived so that it actually has a use.<br /><br />As to the mechanics, you seem to be laboring under the delusion that any random action sitting against speech can be joined to it with a comma, sometimes even on both ends. To the former: only if it&#039;s a speaking action, and to the latter: no.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 95

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>The Hearth's warming pageant is coming up and Rarity is given the unique opportunity to make Princess Luna a dress for the occasion.//
I'll grant you that synopses aren't the easiest things to write well. First, it really helps to keep things active, so the passive "is given" doesn't provide an engaging hook. You need a comma between the clauses (see the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread). And capitalize the whole occasion, "Hearth's Warming."

Story:
My first impression gets delayed. I've just read your synopsis and decided I'm interested enough to move on to the story, and the first thing I get is the author's note. It really pushes me out of the bit of immersion I already got from the synopsis. You need to keep me engaged. I'd recommend moving the A/N to the end.

>“Sister, the Hearth’s Warming pageant is just around the corner! Whatever shall we do?”//

After a few paragraphs, I finally got to why she was agitated. But it's only a reason for her to be agitated, not Celestia as well. So why the "we" here?

>Celestia didn’t bat an eye as she continued signing through Equestria’s tax reforms, “It’s still three weeks away, Luna. No need to get yourself worked up quite yet.”//

You've punctuated the lead-in as if it were an attribution, but you have no speaking verb. You can't just take any random action and attach it to a quote with a comma.

>ruffling her wings in agitation//

Telly, specifically the "in agitation" part. Read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, which directly addresses this type of phrasing.

>Her own desk, covered in paperwork from days of foreign diplomatic meetings, all utterly ignored in the Lunar Princesses current predicament.//

This isn't a complete sentence. Fragments can work for effect, but usually as follow-up comments and when in a subjective viewpoint, neither of which you have here, so it feels more like an oversight. You also have a plural where you need a possessive (Lunar Princess's).

>“Come now, sister,” Celestia smiled patronizingly as she lowered her quill, “It’s not like you to act the filly around this time of year. It’s just a pageant, Lulu.”//

Same deal with the non-speaking-action attribution, but you've also punctuated it like the quoted sentence is continuous, yet you haven't capitalized it that way. Have a look at the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization, too. And that "patronizingly" is telly. Show me how it looks and let me determine the emotion on my own. If you write it well, I'll get where you want me to go.

>Well sister//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>It’s simply the way it is, sister//

When used as a term of address, "Sister" would be capitalized.

>Sweetie Belle peeked down the stairway//

Missing a period (though I suspect you would have put a comma there).

>Rarity didn’t seem to hear her sister leave//

Who holds your perspective here? Not Sweetie Belle, because she's gone. Not Rarity, because she wouldn't use "seem" here; she'd know explicitly whether she heard her sister leave. Opal? I can't tell. Such is the danger of having your narrator make judgments. We have to know whose judgments they are.

>ignoring the unicorns whining//

Missing apostrophe.

>The items around her feel to the ground in a shocked clatter//

Typo. And how exactly would the items or clatter be shocked?

>Rarity wrung her hooves nervously as the train rattled along the tracks. She glanced nervously out the compartment’s window at the rapidly approaching city against the mountainside.She was furiously listing off all the eight hooves high ponies she knew and not many came to mind.//

Missing a space before the last sentence. Look at the emotions here. They're all being spoon-fed to me: furiously, nervously (used in successive sentences—watch the repetition).

>It took a moment of terrified cowering on the seat before she realized the train had only gone into a tunnel.//

And given the number of times she's been to Canterlot, this surprises her?

>Just…//

It's much more common to leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it's at one end of a sentence, but if you're married to this, it isn't unheard of.

>“I want you to escort her to me. I do not expect her to get into trouble in a city such as this, but getting lost is easy for one not accustomed to the city’s layout.”//

Rarity's been to the palace how many times by now? Off the top of my head, I can think of 5 times in canon.

>The wisp’s blue light blinked twice in union with each other.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to be saying.

>Luna turned to her wisps a look of panic on her face.//

Missing comma, besides being very telly, and why does she have more than one of them now?

>What do you mean there is no ‘E’ in Olde anymore?//

How would that "E" have even been audible?

>the guard asks//

Why the switch to present tense?

>deva//

diva

>she said trying to recover from the embarrassment she just experienced.//

Most times, you'll set off a participle with a comma. And the telling again!

>W..wait!//

Do a stutter with a hyphen, do an ellipsis.

>she would of seen//

Would have. C'mon. That's a rookie mistake.

>hearth's warming//

You've been inconsistent at capitalizing this and using the apostrophe.

>back side//

One word.

>it’s place//

Its/it's confusion.

>visibly darkened//

As opposed to…? Audibly darkened?

>a brush floated up too her hair//

Too/to confusion.

>your Majesty//

You're also inconsistent at capitalizing the full honorific.

>Cutie mark//

More inconsistent capitalization.

>“Very well then,” Rarity started with a smile. “Shall we get started?”//

Watch the word repetition.

>Her horn shined brightly//

"Shined" takes a direct object. You want "shone."

>T-thank//

Think of what sound would actually be repeated. Th-thank.

>Oh! well…//

Capitalization.

>Rarity”//

Missing punctuation.

>legs - gracefully//

Please use a proper hyphen.

>beautiful!’

This needs to be a double quote.

>as those word’s left the seamstresses muzzle//

And now that you finally use an apostrophe, it's wrong, and you ironically have a spot a few words later that needs one.

>she looked as if she was about to choke on pure embarrassment//

This scene had held to Rarity's perspective, but how does she know what her face looks like? And then in the following sentence, you're definitely in Luna's perspective. Have a look at the section on head hopping, too.

>the sudden heavy quiet//

Missing end punctuation.

>Somewhere in Ponyville, one Pinkie Pie suddenly had a massive attack of the trembles and started checking for violently swinging doors.//

Why does this constitute a scene?

>“W-well, I…’//

Another mismatch of quotes.

>Oh, no, t-take your time~!//

~ is not proper punctuation.

>infront//

Typo.

>We..//

Three dots in an ellipsis.

>Luna looked down at the table//

She was already doing so. You don't need to tell me again.

There are obviously a number of persistent mechanical problems here. Now, while this was a cute story, it suffers from a common issue with shipping stories. Simply put, the characters are shoved together, and the reader is expected to share the author's enthusiasm for the pairing. There's nothing presented to make it believable. Luna and Rarity have encountered each other briefly before, but no reference is made to that. Luna is just suddenly going to have romantic thoughts because she shares close quarters with her for a single night? And Rarity conveniently reciprocates? It's your job to make this relationship seem natural. You have to justify it to the point that it makes sense this could happen. There's no latent attraction? Neither one of them thinks fondly on the few times they'd met before and noticed things that endeared the other to them? Sometimes it takes starting from square one, and sometimes we can see the happy couple already together, but in either case, it takes showing me that they have reasonable chemistry together and that it all develops in a natural way.

It's like the difference between turning on a sad movie just in time to see someone die and watching the whole thing to know exactly what's being lost. One's got some default, superficial emotional reaction, but the other contains the real investment that makes me care about the characters. All that was here was a single kiss and a few moments of being comedically uncomfortable. Neither one really even had an emotional reaction to what was happening romantically. Luna basically admits that the wisp is acting partly to voice her libido, and Rarity is blissfully oblivious… until she's already magically in love. It takes a deeper picture of a relationship to stand out above all the other shipping stories we receive.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Hearth&#039;s warming pageant is coming up and Rarity is given the unique opportunity to make Princess Luna a dress for the occasion.//</span><br />I&#039;ll grant you that synopses aren&#039;t the easiest things to write well. First, it really helps to keep things active, so the passive &quot;is given&quot; doesn&#039;t provide an engaging hook. You need a comma between the clauses (see the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread). And capitalize the whole occasion, &quot;Hearth&#039;s Warming.&quot;<br /><br />Story:<br />My first impression gets delayed. I&#039;ve just read your synopsis and decided I&#039;m interested enough to move on to the story, and the first thing I get is the author&#039;s note. It really pushes me out of the bit of immersion I already got from the synopsis. You need to keep me engaged. I&#039;d recommend moving the A/N to the end.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Sister, the Hearth’s Warming pageant is just around the corner! Whatever shall we do?”//</span><br />After a few paragraphs, I finally got to why she was agitated. But it&#039;s only a reason for her to be agitated, not Celestia as well. So why the &quot;we&quot; here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia didn’t bat an eye as she continued signing through Equestria’s tax reforms, “It’s still three weeks away, Luna. No need to get yourself worked up quite yet.”//</span><br />You&#039;ve punctuated the lead-in as if it were an attribution, but you have no speaking verb. You can&#039;t just take any random action and attach it to a quote with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ruffling her wings in agitation//</span><br />Telly, specifically the &quot;in agitation&quot; part. Read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, which directly addresses this type of phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her own desk, covered in paperwork from days of foreign diplomatic meetings, all utterly ignored in the Lunar Princesses current predicament.//</span><br />This isn&#039;t a complete sentence. Fragments can work for effect, but usually as follow-up comments and when in a subjective viewpoint, neither of which you have here, so it feels more like an oversight. You also have a plural where you need a possessive (Lunar Princess&#039;s).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Come now, sister,” Celestia smiled patronizingly as she lowered her quill, “It’s not like you to act the filly around this time of year. It’s just a pageant, Lulu.”//</span><br />Same deal with the non-speaking-action attribution, but you&#039;ve also punctuated it like the quoted sentence is continuous, yet you haven&#039;t capitalized it that way. Have a look at the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization, too. And that &quot;patronizingly&quot; is telly. Show me how it looks and let me determine the emotion on my own. If you write it well, I&#039;ll get where you want me to go.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well sister//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s simply the way it is, sister//</span><br />When used as a term of address, &quot;Sister&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle peeked down the stairway//</span><br />Missing a period (though I suspect you would have put a comma there).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity didn’t seem to hear her sister leave//</span><br />Who holds your perspective here? Not Sweetie Belle, because she&#039;s gone. Not Rarity, because she wouldn&#039;t use &quot;seem&quot; here; she&#039;d know explicitly whether she heard her sister leave. Opal? I can&#039;t tell. Such is the danger of having your narrator make judgments. We have to know whose judgments they are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ignoring the unicorns whining//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The items around her feel to the ground in a shocked clatter//</span><br />Typo. And how exactly would the items or clatter be shocked?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity wrung her hooves nervously as the train rattled along the tracks. She glanced nervously out the compartment’s window at the rapidly approaching city against the mountainside.She was furiously listing off all the eight hooves high ponies she knew and not many came to mind.//</span><br />Missing a space before the last sentence. Look at the emotions here. They&#039;re all being spoon-fed to me: furiously, nervously (used in successive sentences—watch the repetition).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It took a moment of terrified cowering on the seat before she realized the train had only gone into a tunnel.//</span><br />And given the number of times she&#039;s been to Canterlot, this surprises her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just…//</span><br />It&#039;s much more common to leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it&#039;s at one end of a sentence, but if you&#039;re married to this, it isn&#039;t unheard of.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I want you to escort her to me. I do not expect her to get into trouble in a city such as this, but getting lost is easy for one not accustomed to the city’s layout.”//</span><br />Rarity&#039;s been to the palace how many times by now? Off the top of my head, I can think of 5 times in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The wisp’s blue light blinked twice in union with each other.//</span><br />I have no idea what this is supposed to be saying.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna turned to her wisps a look of panic on her face.//</span><br />Missing comma, besides being very telly, and why does she have more than one of them now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What do you mean there is no ‘E’ in Olde anymore?//</span><br />How would that &quot;E&quot; have even been audible?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the guard asks//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;deva//</span><br />diva<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she said trying to recover from the embarrassment she just experienced.//</span><br />Most times, you&#039;ll set off a participle with a comma. And the telling again!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;W..wait!//</span><br />Do a stutter with a hyphen, do an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she would of seen//</span><br />Would have. C&#039;mon. That&#039;s a rookie mistake.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hearth&#039;s warming//</span><br />You&#039;ve been inconsistent at capitalizing this and using the apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back side//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s place//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;visibly darkened//</span><br />As opposed to…? Audibly darkened?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a brush floated up too her hair//</span><br />Too/to confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Majesty//</span><br />You&#039;re also inconsistent at capitalizing the full honorific.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cutie mark//</span><br />More inconsistent capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Very well then,” Rarity started with a smile. “Shall we get started?”//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her horn shined brightly//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; takes a direct object. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-thank//</span><br />Think of what sound would actually be repeated. Th-thank.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh! well…//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity”//</span><br />Missing punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;legs - gracefully//</span><br />Please use a proper hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;beautiful!’</span><br />This needs to be a double quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as those word’s left the seamstresses muzzle//</span><br />And now that you finally use an apostrophe, it&#039;s wrong, and you ironically have a spot a few words later that needs one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she looked as if she was about to choke on pure embarrassment//</span><br />This scene had held to Rarity&#039;s perspective, but how does she know what her face looks like? And then in the following sentence, you&#039;re definitely in Luna&#039;s perspective. Have a look at the section on head hopping, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the sudden heavy quiet//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Somewhere in Ponyville, one Pinkie Pie suddenly had a massive attack of the trembles and started checking for violently swinging doors.//</span><br />Why does this constitute a scene?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“W-well, I…’//</span><br />Another mismatch of quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, no, t-take your time~!//</span><br />~ is not proper punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;infront//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We..//</span><br />Three dots in an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna looked down at the table//</span><br />She was already doing so. You don&#039;t need to tell me again.<br /><br />There are obviously a number of persistent mechanical problems here. Now, while this was a cute story, it suffers from a common issue with shipping stories. Simply put, the characters are shoved together, and the reader is expected to share the author&#039;s enthusiasm for the pairing. There&#039;s nothing presented to make it believable. Luna and Rarity have encountered each other briefly before, but no reference is made to that. Luna is just suddenly going to have romantic thoughts because she shares close quarters with her for a single night? And Rarity conveniently reciprocates? It&#039;s your job to make this relationship seem natural. You have to justify it to the point that it makes sense this could happen. There&#039;s no latent attraction? Neither one of them thinks fondly on the few times they&#039;d met before and noticed things that endeared the other to them? Sometimes it takes starting from square one, and sometimes we can see the happy couple already together, but in either case, it takes showing me that they have reasonable chemistry together and that it all develops in a natural way.<br /><br />It&#039;s like the difference between turning on a sad movie just in time to see someone die and watching the whole thing to know exactly what&#039;s being lost. One&#039;s got some default, superficial emotional reaction, but the other contains the real investment that makes me care about the characters. All that was here was a single kiss and a few moments of being comedically uncomfortable. Neither one really even had an emotional reaction to what was happening romantically. Luna basically admits that the wisp is acting partly to voice her libido, and Rarity is blissfully oblivious… until she&#039;s already magically in love. It takes a deeper picture of a relationship to stand out above all the other shipping stories we receive.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 96

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>knock//

>Knock knock knock//
Don't put sound effects in the narration like this. Just describe it.

>She intended to give whomever was knocking a piece of her mind.//

That's actually a situation fo "whoever." It's the subject of the noun clause "whoever was knocking."

Big Mac's accent is coming across too thick. Ya, mah, Ah… The reader knows how he sounds and will fill it in for you. It's more about word choice and phrasing. You don't want to make it difficult to read or have something like this draw attention to the narration itself.

>Twilight began plotting the most efficient sequence to wake each pony.//

Don't summarize, especially since this wouldn't happen instantaneously. Take me through a couple of these thoughts.

>knowing//

If you're going to clip the g's off his words, be consistent about it.

I'd encourage you to take advantage of FiMFiction's [hr] bbcode character to draw a more definitive scene break.

>“Rainbow Dash! That’s not helping. Show some decorum.”//

Since this is the first time she speaks, and it's not a cold open, you probably shouldn't go without attributing it. And it's standard to italicize a ! or ? when it's on an italicized word.

>Dash zipped away.//

C'mon. Good chance for a bit of comedy here. Give me a little body language or facial expression.

>“Actually, the anandamide in chocolate is a natural mood enhancer.”//

You should attribute this, too. It wasn't clear to me that this wasn't Pinkie speaking until I got to the next paragraph. Since Pinkie and Rarity were the two most recent conversants, the assumption is the unattributed dialogue will be one of them, unless it has an very distinctive voice.

>ya’ll//

You spelled this right the first time you used it. Why not here?

>Fluttershy jumped as she felt something small brush her legs as it flit by.//

The stacked "as" clauses are repetitive, and there's a verb tense problem at the end there. Also watch the perspective here. You started the story in Twilight's head, but since then, it's really backed off into an objective viewpoint. Little dips into a character's perspective like this are fine in that case, but you ought to keep things even. If you do this very irregularly, it feels more choppy. But don't fall into the trap of making very abrupt switches into a deep perspective, either. It's a delicate thing to get right.

>Apple Bloom emerged from the forest of legs to throw her forelegs around her sister.//

To avoid repetition of "legs," you might want to rephrase the hug.

>‘bout//

Smart quotes never get leading apostrophes right. This one's backward. I bet there are others. Do a sweep for these.

>He shot a glance towards Applejack and she nodded.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. There's a section at the top of this thread that explains comma use with conjunctions.

>The old mare was as good as her word and the girls soon found themselves seated in the Apple living room.//

Same thing. And "Apples' living room" probably works better.

>Applejack noted with silent gratitude that Rarity withheld her usual comments on the absolute necessity of owning at least one fine china set.//

Careful. Your perspective's starting to jump around. This is AJ's, and the previous sentence wavered very close to Rarity's.

>Dash ignored the glares coming her way.//

See, unless you say how someone else interpreted her behavior this way, you're in Dash's head now.

>darling//

You're also falling into the fandom conceit that Rarity says this all the time. This is already at least the third time I've seen it, while canon Rarity only says it maybe once every other episode (yes, someone's done the research), and I can't remember her doing it more than twice in any episodes.

>one notch above semi-solid//

Piling on vague degrees makes something even more vague. One notch above solid, I could see, but semi-solid is pretty nebulous to start with.

>She also reached for the sugar bowl, adding one spoonful before passing it to Pinkie//

Watch your participles. They can often be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the bowl is adding a spoonful.

>“We’ve found evidence//

When the previous paragraph ends with a quote, and the next starts with another by the same speaker, you can leave the closing quotation marks off the previous paragraph.

>blinked several time//

Typo.

>Might be that thick accent o’ yours//

My point exactly about the Apple family accent. It's overdone. You mention the doctor's, but you didn't write one for him at all. And it didn't end up mattering. Though if you want the reader to hear one, you should mention this before he speaks.

> No Apple, and Ah mean No Apple//

Why is that second "no" capitalized?

>ice-water//

No hyphen here.

>Pinkie piped up with a question//

And yet she never asked one…

>shuteye//

Shut-eye.

>“Actually… I do know of a way we can find out tonight.//

Forgot to close those quotes.

>bleary eyed//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>Twilight purposefully ignored Rainbow’s question and instead kept her eyes to the floor as she stalked into the kitchen. Cabinets being flung open followed by the sound of clinking glass could be heard.//

Perspective again. You start in Twilight's head (only she could know it was "purposeful"), but by the end of the same paragraph, you're in an indeterminate one, but definitely not Twilight's, since she's the one making the noise. Don't switch perspective within a paragraph.

>She returned with a tumbler and a bottle of scotch held aloft in her magic//

Okay, you kind of veered off the track there. She's never dealt with any interpersonal crises remotely like this, even ons involving her friends, even ones that were her fault. Look at how she behaved in "Magical Mystery Cure" after being th one who caused all the trouble. And despite canon instances of cider (maybe not) and salt licks (definitely) being intoxicating substances, she's never seen to care much for either one.

>thaumantic//

You spelled it "thaummantic" last time you used it. And since it's not really a thing, I guess you can use what you want, as long as you're consistent.

>Thaumantic overdoses are incredibly rare so there isn’t much information//

Needs a comma between the clauses again.

>…so that’s it then?//

A leading ellipsis os really for completing an earlier quote that got interrupted or for the speaker just becoming audible. You don't really have either here. In any case, not having the former means that you should capitalize this anyway.

>INJUSTICE! Injustice, I say!//

Italics are preferred for emphasis. And her word choice here is rather melodramatic. She's been given a big shock, so she's not immediately going to scoop up some big words. She's going to blast out whatever comes into her head as a reflex, which would be pretty raw emotion. You had me going with pretty accurate character reactions so far, but this one doesn't quite ring true.

>Twilight’s own eyes narrowed at underlying accusation.//

Missing word.

>“How long have you known, Twi?” Applejack sat in front of the case which had once held the Elements of Harmony, running a hoof along the glass.//

That body language kind of doesn't suit her mood here, unless you do something to explain it more. I'm of a mind of a drill sergeant running his finger over some insignificant surface so he can find a bit of dust and bitch out his men, and that doesn't suit AJ.

>The Princess had me undergo a full examination by the best doctors and mages in Canterlot. My thaum count was off the charts//

And so it never occurred to her that magic might affect her friends like this? She's cast spells on all of them at times.

>The unicorn swooned onto her summoned chaise lounge.//

Be very careful here. You're pulling canon theatrics into a decidedly non-canon subject. It's undercutting the moment's seriousness. Even Rarity was self-deprecating about the swooning at times, so it loses its impact as an authentic response.

>“…”//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not here. If her pause is meaningful, show me what she's doing. If it's not then skip it.

>she wailed//

That's an abrupt change from lying there quietly and without any discernible expression. You're letting adherence to canon interfere with the prevailing mood again. This would be more powerful if you went for a more authentic emotional reaction. Well, unless your intent is to have the entire thing to turn out happy in the end, then it might work this way. Your call on that, I guess.

>I always wanted to know, wanted to feel//

To be fair, they can't conceive, but they could have an embryonic implantation and still be pregnant… I know to some that's not enough, but… food for thought.

>A barely audible growl came from Applejack’s direction, but Dash didn’t appear to notice.//

Didn't appear to whom? You don't have an identifiable perspective here.

>“Whatever. Not like you do either.”//

I really don't see why Dash is pushing AJ's buttons like this. It's not like Dash is mad about anything. So what's her motivation for being deliberately antagonistic like this? Especially about a subject that she should know means a lot to the Apples.

>We all know Granny Smith does most the work//

Missing word.

>A jet of steam escaped Applejack’s nostrils.//

File that under the cartoon theatrics versus realism again. It doesn't fit the mood.

>Her name is Zuri.//

Oh, please, please tell me this isn't a reference to a certain show on Disney.

>We got traditions, and one of them is that you only become an Apple by birth or marriage.//

Hm. Given a certain recent episode, you might need to rethink this.

>flea ridden//

Hyphenate.

>You expect me to the believe//

Extraneous word in there.

>a bucket of horse manure//

This just sounds odd to me. Isn't this like one of us saying, "This is a toilet of people crap!"

I liked this story. I really did. The only consistent problems I'd note are the wavering perspective and the overdone Apple accents. There were also a few spots where you chose not to attribute dialogue, and it wasn't always obvious who was speaking. Watch that when it's the first time someone speaks, or there are more than two characters speaking.

Y'know, I went into this with quite a few plot-related problems I expected I'd have to write up, but you actually addressed pretty much all of them, so good job on exploring the topic. I do have a few hang-ups still.

If this is the type of thing they normally scan for during a physical, wouldn't it also be pretty public knowledge? I mean, everyone knows radiation is a bad thing, but there's a certain amount everyone gets that doesn't hurt anything. If you get exposed to a large amount, you know that's a bad thing. Though that's not really something they check for in a physical, so say something like cholesterol. I just have a hard time believing that this is catching them by surprise so much. And why is the effect so specific to reproduction? It's not possibly going to cause any other health problems? That would seem to be an evolution toward limiting the gene pool for strong magic users, which… well, I'm not sure what implications that would have. Is this also specific to females? If so, why? If not, why wouldn't someone like Starswirl already know about it? For that matter, during "Magic Duel," Twilight refers to "high level unicorns" who can cast age spells. So there are very powerful unicorns out there. Do they have the same problem? What about Spike? He's been subjected to an awful lot of magic.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knock//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Knock knock knock//</span><br />Don&#039;t put sound effects in the narration like this. Just describe it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She intended to give whomever was knocking a piece of her mind.//</span><br />That&#039;s actually a situation fo &quot;whoever.&quot; It&#039;s the subject of the noun clause &quot;whoever was knocking.&quot;<br /><br />Big Mac&#039;s accent is coming across too thick. Ya, mah, Ah… The reader knows how he sounds and will fill it in for you. It&#039;s more about word choice and phrasing. You don&#039;t want to make it difficult to read or have something like this draw attention to the narration itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight began plotting the most efficient sequence to wake each pony.//</span><br />Don&#039;t summarize, especially since this wouldn&#039;t happen instantaneously. Take me through a couple of these thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knowing//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to clip the g&#039;s off his words, be consistent about it.<br /><br />I&#039;d encourage you to take advantage of FiMFiction&#039;s [hr] bbcode character to draw a more definitive scene break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Rainbow <i>Dash</i>! That’s not helping. Show some decorum.”//</span><br />Since this is the first time she speaks, and it&#039;s not a cold open, you probably shouldn&#039;t go without attributing it. And it&#039;s standard to italicize a ! or ? when it&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash zipped away.//</span><br />C&#039;mon. Good chance for a bit of comedy here. Give me a little body language or facial expression.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Actually, the anandamide in chocolate is a natural mood enhancer.”//</span><br />You should attribute this, too. It wasn&#039;t clear to me that this wasn&#039;t Pinkie speaking until I got to the next paragraph. Since Pinkie and Rarity were the two most recent conversants, the assumption is the unattributed dialogue will be one of them, unless it has an very distinctive voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ya’ll//</span><br />You spelled this right the first time you used it. Why not here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy jumped as she felt something small brush her legs as it flit by.//</span><br />The stacked &quot;as&quot; clauses are repetitive, and there&#039;s a verb tense problem at the end there. Also watch the perspective here. You started the story in Twilight&#039;s head, but since then, it&#039;s really backed off into an objective viewpoint. Little dips into a character&#039;s perspective like this are fine in that case, but you ought to keep things even. If you do this very irregularly, it feels more choppy. But don&#039;t fall into the trap of making very abrupt switches into a deep perspective, either. It&#039;s a delicate thing to get right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom emerged from the forest of legs to throw her forelegs around her sister.//</span><br />To avoid repetition of &quot;legs,&quot; you might want to rephrase the hug.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘bout//</span><br />Smart quotes never get leading apostrophes right. This one&#039;s backward. I bet there are others. Do a sweep for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He shot a glance towards Applejack and she nodded.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread that explains comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The old mare was as good as her word and the girls soon found themselves seated in the Apple living room.//</span><br />Same thing. And &quot;Apples&#039; living room&quot; probably works better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack noted with silent gratitude that Rarity withheld her usual comments on the absolute necessity of owning at least one fine china set.//</span><br />Careful. Your perspective&#039;s starting to jump around. This is AJ&#039;s, and the previous sentence wavered very close to Rarity&#039;s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash ignored the glares coming her way.//</span><br />See, unless you say how someone else interpreted her behavior this way, you&#039;re in Dash&#039;s head now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;darling//</span><br />You&#039;re also falling into the fandom conceit that Rarity says this all the time. This is already at least the third time I&#039;ve seen it, while canon Rarity only says it maybe once every other episode (yes, someone&#039;s done the research), and I can&#039;t remember her doing it more than twice in any episodes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one notch above semi-solid//</span><br />Piling on vague degrees makes something even more vague. One notch above solid, I could see, but semi-solid is pretty nebulous to start with.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She also reached for the sugar bowl, adding one spoonful before passing it to Pinkie//</span><br />Watch your participles. They can often be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like the bowl is adding a spoonful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“We’ve found evidence//</span><br />When the previous paragraph ends with a quote, and the next starts with another by the same speaker, you can leave the closing quotation marks off the previous paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blinked several time//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Might be that thick accent o’ yours//</span><br />My point exactly about the Apple family accent. It&#039;s overdone. You mention the doctor&#039;s, but you didn&#039;t write one for him at all. And it didn&#039;t end up mattering. Though if you want the reader to hear one, you should mention this before he speaks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; No Apple, and Ah mean <i>No Apple</i>//</span><br />Why is that second &quot;no&quot; capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ice-water//</span><br />No hyphen here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie piped up with a question//</span><br />And yet she never asked one…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shuteye//</span><br />Shut-eye.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Actually… I do know of a way we can find out tonight.//</span><br />Forgot to close those quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bleary eyed//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight purposefully ignored Rainbow’s question and instead kept her eyes to the floor as she stalked into the kitchen. Cabinets being flung open followed by the sound of clinking glass could be heard.//</span><br />Perspective again. You start in Twilight&#039;s head (only she could know it was &quot;purposeful&quot;), but by the end of the same paragraph, you&#039;re in an indeterminate one, but definitely not Twilight&#039;s, since she&#039;s the one making the noise. Don&#039;t switch perspective within a paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She returned with a tumbler and a bottle of scotch held aloft in her magic//</span><br />Okay, you kind of veered off the track there. She&#039;s never dealt with any interpersonal crises remotely like this, even ons involving her friends, even ones that were her fault. Look at how she behaved in &quot;Magical Mystery Cure&quot; after being th one who caused all the trouble. And despite canon instances of cider (maybe not) and salt licks (definitely) being intoxicating substances, she&#039;s never seen to care much for either one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thaumantic//</span><br />You spelled it &quot;thaummantic&quot; last time you used it. And since it&#039;s not really a thing, I guess you can use what you want, as long as you&#039;re consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thaumantic overdoses are incredibly rare so there isn’t much information//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…so that’s it then?//</span><br />A leading ellipsis os really for completing an earlier quote that got interrupted or for the speaker just becoming audible. You don&#039;t really have either here. In any case, not having the former means that you should capitalize this anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;INJUSTICE! Injustice, I say!//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis. And her word choice here is rather melodramatic. She&#039;s been given a big shock, so she&#039;s not immediately going to scoop up some big words. She&#039;s going to blast out whatever comes into her head as a reflex, which would be pretty raw emotion. You had me going with pretty accurate character reactions so far, but this one doesn&#039;t quite ring true.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s own eyes narrowed at underlying accusation.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“How long have you known, Twi?” Applejack sat in front of the case which had once held the Elements of Harmony, running a hoof along the glass.//</span><br />That body language kind of doesn&#039;t suit her mood here, unless you do something to explain it more. I&#039;m of a mind of a drill sergeant running his finger over some insignificant surface so he can find a bit of dust and bitch out his men, and that doesn&#039;t suit AJ.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Princess had me undergo a full examination by the best doctors and mages in Canterlot. My thaum count was off the charts//</span><br />And so it never occurred to her that magic might affect her friends like this? She&#039;s cast spells on all of them at times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The unicorn swooned onto her summoned chaise lounge.//</span><br />Be very careful here. You&#039;re pulling canon theatrics into a decidedly non-canon subject. It&#039;s undercutting the moment&#039;s seriousness. Even Rarity was self-deprecating about the swooning at times, so it loses its impact as an authentic response.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“…”//</span><br />This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not here. If her pause is meaningful, show me what she&#039;s doing. If it&#039;s not then skip it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she wailed//</span><br />That&#039;s an abrupt change from lying there quietly and without any discernible expression. You&#039;re letting adherence to canon interfere with the prevailing mood again. This would be more powerful if you went for a more authentic emotional reaction. Well, unless your intent is to have the entire thing to turn out happy in the end, then it might work this way. Your call on that, I guess.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I always wanted to know, wanted to feel//</span><br />To be fair, they can&#039;t conceive, but they could have an embryonic implantation and still be pregnant… I know to some that&#039;s not enough, but… food for thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A barely audible growl came from Applejack’s direction, but Dash didn’t appear to notice.//</span><br />Didn&#039;t appear to whom? You don&#039;t have an identifiable perspective here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Whatever. Not like you do either.”//</span><br />I really don&#039;t see why Dash is pushing AJ&#039;s buttons like this. It&#039;s not like Dash is mad about anything. So what&#039;s her motivation for being deliberately antagonistic like this? Especially about a subject that she should know means a lot to the Apples.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We all know Granny Smith does most the work//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A jet of steam escaped Applejack’s nostrils.//</span><br />File that under the cartoon theatrics versus realism again. It doesn&#039;t fit the mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her name is Zuri.//</span><br />Oh, please, please tell me this isn&#039;t a reference to a certain show on Disney.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We got traditions, and one of them is that you only become an Apple by birth or marriage.//</span><br />Hm. Given a certain recent episode, you might need to rethink this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flea ridden//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You expect me to the believe//</span><br />Extraneous word in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bucket of horse manure//</span><br />This just sounds odd to me. Isn&#039;t this like one of us saying, &quot;This is a toilet of people crap!&quot;<br /><br />I liked this story. I really did. The only consistent problems I&#039;d note are the wavering perspective and the overdone Apple accents. There were also a few spots where you chose not to attribute dialogue, and it wasn&#039;t always obvious who was speaking. Watch that when it&#039;s the first time someone speaks, or there are more than two characters speaking.<br /><br />Y&#039;know, I went into this with quite a few plot-related problems I expected I&#039;d have to write up, but you actually addressed pretty much all of them, so good job on exploring the topic. I do have a few hang-ups still.<br /><br />If this is the type of thing they normally scan for during a physical, wouldn&#039;t it also be pretty public knowledge? I mean, everyone knows radiation is a bad thing, but there&#039;s a certain amount everyone gets that doesn&#039;t hurt anything. If you get exposed to a large amount, you know that&#039;s a bad thing. Though that&#039;s not really something they check for in a physical, so say something like cholesterol. I just have a hard time believing that this is catching them by surprise so much. And why is the effect so specific to reproduction? It&#039;s not possibly going to cause any other health problems? That would seem to be an evolution toward limiting the gene pool for strong magic users, which… well, I&#039;m not sure what implications that would have. Is this also specific to females? If so, why? If not, why wouldn&#039;t someone like Starswirl already know about it? For that matter, during &quot;Magic Duel,&quot; Twilight refers to &quot;high level unicorns&quot; who can cast age spells. So there are very powerful unicorns out there. Do they have the same problem? What about Spike? He&#039;s been subjected to an awful lot of magic.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 97

I'm struck by the number of "to be" verbs in the opening paragraph. You want to grab the reader's interest immediately, and action is a far better way of doing this.

>Very well, princess//

As a term of address, that would be capitalized.

>unsure if she should go on//

And after starting the story in Celestia's perspective, you're dipping into Plumed Quill's here. Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread if you want to see some rationale on why perspective shifts need to be considered with care, though I suspect this one is more oversight. This is information that you don't need o be in Quill's perspective to convey; you can instead show me what Celestia sees that would lead her to conclude this.

>Princess Celestia stopped in her tracks.//

How can she stop in her tracks if you never had her going anywhere? Unless you mean that figuratively, though neither did I get the sense that she had any momentum built up in her thoughts.

>turning back to face them//

Ah, so now it appears the bit I flagged in the previous comments did refer to physical movement. Then, you do need to show that she started to leave the room.

>and if it does//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>leaving Celestia alone with her thoughts//

Most times, you'll want to set off participles with a comma.

>She removed her crown and set it on the throne behind her; It was feeling exceptionally heavy right at the moment.//

Don't capitalize after a semicolon.

>supposedly-infinite//

-ly adverbs are mostly exempt from hyphenation, especially in two-word phrases.

>and even if they weren’t//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause again.

>That’s why she was surprised when she reached the dining room, and saw Princess Luna had already begun dinner without her.//

Unnecessary comma, since there's no new clause, and watch the use of demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns, since they often have broad, vague antecedents and are self-referential to the narration.

>who looked tense and uncomfortable//

What about his demeanor makes her conclude this?

>hoping to put him at ease//

Again, it'd be more powerful to show me what she does to accomplish this than bluntly tell me her purpose.

>your majesty//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>her mind finally made the connection.//

Capitalization.

>waiters appeared at her side in an instant, placing a goblet of wine next to her plate//

Multiple waiters placed one goblet? Either it's one waiter, or you need to give the others something to do.

>“Umm…” Glinting Steel bit his lip, eyes darting to his lap as he tried to recall, “didn’t that end a long time ago?”//

You're capitalizing this as if the intervening bit is a speech attribution, but you have no speaking action. This also is another shallow perspective switch that doesn't add anything. Best to stay with Celestia. What does she see him do such that she concludes he's trying to remember. Frankly, biting his lip is enough.

>cease fire//

Hyphenate.

>Although…” Luna glanced over to her sister, “…some of us are more optimistic than others.”//

Maybe this is what you were trying to do with the last quote I commented on. To put a narrative aside in a quote, here's what you do:
>Although—” Luna glanced over to her sister “—some of us are more optimistic than others.”
if the speech actually stops for the action, or:
>Although”—Luna glanced over to her sister—“some of us are more optimistic than others.”
if the speech is continuous.

>she shuddered.//

Capitalization. This isn't a dialogue attribution, so it needs to be a separate sentence.

>She paused, and gulped down more wine.//

No need for the comma. There isn't a new clause.

>Luna had been right, it really was good.//

Comma splice. A dash or semicolon would be appropriate.

>felt her ire beginning to rise//

And how does this feel? Are there any physical symptoms, any thoughts that arise?

>overly-lavish//

Same as before, no hyphen for the -ly adverb.

>“Well, we’ll soon fix that. Cheers!” She floated her own glass over the center of the table//

I'm guessing the speaker and actor here are Luna, but it's not at all clear. Just name her as the speaker.

>she paused, noticing for the first time that her words were coming out a bit slurred.//

Capitalization.

>Feeling a bit tipsy, sister?//

As a term of address that would be capitalized.

>“I’m not as think as you drunk I am.”//

Old joke is old. This is less endearing and more inducing of an eye roll.

>but before he could//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>radiating a pleasant warmth through the room//

Comma for the participial phrase.

>He picked up a rook, paused, then placed it back down and moved his bishop instead.//

He's only made one move so far, a pawn. What possible move could he have made that would make a rook and a bishop both options?

>The worst thing you can do is is//

Extraneous word, or failure to punctuate a stutter.

>but he sensed he was about to anyway//

Again, why the perspective shift? At least you stay there longer than a sentence or two, but Celestia's still awake. I'm not sure it buys you anything.

>I don’t have any good answers, princess//

Capitalization.

>There were worse ways to spend the night.//

Well, given the extreme uncomfortableness he expressed in even being around them, I'm not sure he'd be so circumspect.

Of the most common forms, I counted 103 "to be" verbs in the first chapter. That's getting up there for this word count. It didn't stand out to the point that it felt repetitive, but it does indicate that you could be choosing more active verbs, which is always a good thing.

>She forced herself to look out the window, and saw that it was midmorning.//

No comma needed. There's no new clause or lengthy compound structure.

>with what in Celestia’s opinion was completely unwarranted smugness//

And what about it made Celestia conclude it was smugness? Show me the same evidence.

>Besides, half of Equestria already believes you have a secret harem hidden away in some wing of the palace//

So… Luna's the one more in touch with the populace? I guess it can go as a comedic conceit, but this is the kind of thing that usually warrants some explanation.

>At the realization she was really going ahead with that, a bitter taste leaked into her mouth, and she wrinkled her nose. “That’s truly what you wish to do then? Surrender to their demand just to bring them to the negotiating table?”//

There's nothing suggesting that this paragraph is about Luna, but I suspect it is. You need to make that clear.

>Luna walked over and settled onto the cushions next to her, and nuzzled her cheek.//

Unnecessary comma.

>Celestia trailed off.//

You don't need to reiterate what I can already get from the punctuation. It creates a repetitive feel.

>If you signed it//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>and if you didn’t sign it//

Same deal.

>Luna giggled, and draped a wing over Celestia as the two shared a moment.//

Another unneeded comma. And keep in mind that "as" clauses (and participles, for that matter) imply concurrent action, so they share the moment while Celestia drapes her wing, while it'd more likely be the draping first, followed by the moment.

>kingdom//

Without a king?

>Remember, Tia. Listen to your heart.//

Okay, personal opinion warning: this is 100% my thing and not at all Equestria Daily's policy, and it will not affect your acceptance or rejection. I imagine few readers will have an issue with it. This is a nice sentiment, but one way Luna tried to get her to realize it just didn't fit for me. She thinks that setting Celestia up to have drunken sex with someone she has no reason to care about any more than some other random pony on the street, which is essentially what he is, fits with this philosophy? Sure there are stories where what Luna did would fit, but in prodding her to find some higher moral position above duty, making empty connections is part of it? If her message had been "You need to let loose," maybe, but that's not what she's saying. it feels more like a stretch that was shoehorned in for the sake of titillation.

>double checked//

Hyphenate.

>Even when she’d been willing to meet them halfway, and offer them a mutually beneficial arrangement.//

Unnecessary comma.

>sternly-worded//

No hyphen.

>hold up//

holdup

>bullshit//

This is a really, really odd word choice, given that bulls in Equestria are sentient.

>your ‘emperor’ is the thickest, most insufferable moron who I have ever had the displeasure of meeting//

whom

I know of you by reputation, and your writing is up to a par that I'd expect. It was clean enough that I was able to be pretty thorough in compiling notes. I pointed out just about every problem spot I saw instead of just listing a couple and leaving you to find the rest. I did do that for a few things, so you should still make a sweep, but I've listed most of them for you.

I will reiterate, in what again is only my personal opinion, that I didn't care for the romantic angle here, because it really felt at odds with the overall message. Frankly, so did the drunkenness. Listening to your heart and hedonism may sound on the surface to be the same thing, but one is more a conscience thing, and the other is more a "screw everyone else—I'm going to do what I want to do" thing, and Luna comes off as more manipulative than helpful. Really, that thematic dissonance is hurting this story's impact for me.

That said, I don't have to like a story to recognize that it's well written, and I don't see any reason to keep it off the blog if you touch those other things up. And I do enjoy it when princesses go into no-nonsense mode.

Edit:
Now that I've had more time to stew on it, this business with Glinting Steel just bugs me even more. By Luna's own exaggerated opinion, only half the population would be interested in such an arrangement, and Glinting Steel hasn't expressed anything but uncomfortableness about it. Even internally, he was barely accepting, and more in an "Oh well, I can't do anything about it" sense. Does anyone care to find out how he feels about it? Maybe he's married or in a relationship. And yet the Princesses don't give that a second's thought. They attempt to coerce him into being Celestia's stress-relief boy-toy without any thought to what he might want. And I'm supposed to find this heartwarming? I could see this working in a comedy, where being out of character is more readily acceptable for the sake of humor, but this is really out of sorts with the overall message you'e trying to convey. It's actually kind of creepy.

Like I said, this didn't affect my verdict on your story, but it does mean I'll have a different pre-reader take your story on resubmit to see if they share my concern.I&#039;m struck by the number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs in the opening paragraph. You want to grab the reader&#039;s interest immediately, and action is a far better way of doing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Very well, princess//</span><br />As a term of address, that would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unsure if she should go on//</span><br />And after starting the story in Celestia&#039;s perspective, you&#039;re dipping into Plumed Quill&#039;s here. Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread if you want to see some rationale on why perspective shifts need to be considered with care, though I suspect this one is more oversight. This is information that you don&#039;t need o be in Quill&#039;s perspective to convey; you can instead show me what Celestia sees that would lead her to conclude this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Celestia stopped in her tracks.//</span><br />How can she stop in her tracks if you never had her going anywhere? Unless you mean that figuratively, though neither did I get the sense that she had any momentum built up in her thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;turning back to face them//</span><br />Ah, so now it appears the bit I flagged in the previous comments did refer to physical movement. Then, you do need to show that she started to leave the room.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if it does//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaving Celestia alone with her thoughts//</span><br />Most times, you&#039;ll want to set off participles with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She removed her crown and set it on the throne behind her; It was feeling exceptionally heavy right at the moment.//</span><br />Don&#039;t capitalize after a semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;supposedly-infinite//</span><br />-ly adverbs are mostly exempt from hyphenation, especially in two-word phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and even if they weren’t//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That’s why she was surprised when she reached the dining room, and saw Princess Luna had already begun dinner without her.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma, since there&#039;s no new clause, and watch the use of demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns, since they often have broad, vague antecedents and are self-referential to the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who looked tense and uncomfortable//</span><br />What about his demeanor makes her conclude this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoping to put him at ease//</span><br />Again, it&#039;d be more powerful to show me what she does to accomplish this than bluntly tell me her purpose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your majesty//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her mind finally made the connection.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waiters appeared at her side in an instant, placing a goblet of wine next to her plate//</span><br />Multiple waiters placed one goblet? Either it&#039;s one waiter, or you need to give the others something to do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Umm…” Glinting Steel bit his lip, eyes darting to his lap as he tried to recall, “didn’t that end a long time ago?”//</span><br />You&#039;re capitalizing this as if the intervening bit is a speech attribution, but you have no speaking action. This also is another shallow perspective switch that doesn&#039;t add anything. Best to stay with Celestia. What does she see him do such that she concludes he&#039;s trying to remember. Frankly, biting his lip is enough.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cease fire//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Although…” Luna glanced over to her sister, “…some of us are more optimistic than others.”//</span><br />Maybe this is what you were trying to do with the last quote I commented on. To put a narrative aside in a quote, here&#039;s what you do:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Although—” Luna glanced over to her sister “—some of us are more optimistic than others.”</span><br />if the speech actually stops for the action, or:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Although”—Luna glanced over to her sister—“some of us are more optimistic than others.”</span><br />if the speech is continuous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she shuddered.//</span><br />Capitalization. This isn&#039;t a dialogue attribution, so it needs to be a separate sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She paused, and gulped down more wine.//</span><br />No need for the comma. There isn&#039;t a new clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna had been right, it really was good.//</span><br />Comma splice. A dash or semicolon would be appropriate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;felt her ire beginning to rise//</span><br />And how does this feel? Are there any physical symptoms, any thoughts that arise?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;overly-lavish//</span><br />Same as before, no hyphen for the -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Well, we’ll soon fix that. Cheers!” She floated her own glass over the center of the table//</span><br />I&#039;m guessing the speaker and actor here are Luna, but it&#039;s not at all clear. Just name her as the speaker.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she paused, noticing for the first time that her words were coming out a bit slurred.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Feeling a bit tipsy, sister?//</span><br />As a term of address that would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I’m not as think as you drunk I am.”//</span><br />Old joke is old. This is less endearing and more inducing of an eye roll.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before he could//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;radiating a pleasant warmth through the room//</span><br />Comma for the participial phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He picked up a rook, paused, then placed it back down and moved his bishop instead.//</span><br />He&#039;s only made one move so far, a pawn. What possible move could he have made that would make a rook and a bishop both options?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The worst thing you can do is is//</span><br />Extraneous word, or failure to punctuate a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but he sensed he was about to anyway//</span><br />Again, why the perspective shift? At least you stay there longer than a sentence or two, but Celestia&#039;s still awake. I&#039;m not sure it buys you anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t have any good answers, princess//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There were worse ways to spend the night.//</span><br />Well, given the extreme uncomfortableness he expressed in even being around them, I&#039;m not sure he&#039;d be so circumspect.<br /><br />Of the most common forms, I counted 103 &quot;to be&quot; verbs in the first chapter. That&#039;s getting up there for this word count. It didn&#039;t stand out to the point that it felt repetitive, but it does indicate that you could be choosing more active verbs, which is always a good thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She forced herself to look out the window, and saw that it was midmorning.//</span><br />No comma needed. There&#039;s no new clause or lengthy compound structure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with what in Celestia’s opinion was completely unwarranted smugness//</span><br />And what about it made Celestia conclude it was smugness? Show me the same evidence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Besides, half of Equestria already believes you have a secret harem hidden away in some wing of the palace//</span><br />So… Luna&#039;s the one more in touch with the populace? I guess it can go as a comedic conceit, but this is the kind of thing that usually warrants some explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At the realization she was really going ahead with that, a bitter taste leaked into her mouth, and she wrinkled her nose. “That’s truly what you wish to do then? Surrender to their demand just to bring them to the negotiating table?”//</span><br />There&#039;s nothing suggesting that this paragraph is about Luna, but I suspect it is. You need to make that clear.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna walked over and settled onto the cushions next to her, and nuzzled her cheek.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia trailed off.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to reiterate what I can already get from the punctuation. It creates a repetitive feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If you signed it//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if you didn’t sign it//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna giggled, and draped a wing over Celestia as the two shared a moment.//</span><br />Another unneeded comma. And keep in mind that &quot;as&quot; clauses (and participles, for that matter) imply concurrent action, so they share the moment while Celestia drapes her wing, while it&#039;d more likely be the draping first, followed by the moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;kingdom//</span><br />Without a king?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Remember, Tia. Listen to your heart.//</span><br />Okay, personal opinion warning: this is 100% my thing and not at all Equestria Daily&#039;s policy, and it will not affect your acceptance or rejection. I imagine few readers will have an issue with it. This is a nice sentiment, but one way Luna tried to get her to realize it just didn&#039;t fit for me. She thinks that setting Celestia up to have drunken sex with someone she has no reason to care about any more than some other random pony on the street, which is essentially what he is, fits with this philosophy? Sure there are stories where what Luna did would fit, but in prodding her to find some higher moral position above duty, making empty connections is part of it? If her message had been &quot;You need to let loose,&quot; maybe, but that&#039;s not what she&#039;s saying. it feels more like a stretch that was shoehorned in for the sake of titillation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;double checked//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even when she’d been willing to meet them halfway, and offer them a mutually beneficial arrangement.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sternly-worded//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hold up//</span><br />holdup<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bullshit//</span><br />This is a really, really odd word choice, given that bulls in Equestria are sentient.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your ‘emperor’ is the thickest, most insufferable moron who I have ever had the displeasure of meeting//</span><br />whom<br /><br />I know of you by reputation, and your writing is up to a par that I&#039;d expect. It was clean enough that I was able to be pretty thorough in compiling notes. I pointed out just about every problem spot I saw instead of just listing a couple and leaving you to find the rest. I did do that for a few things, so you should still make a sweep, but I&#039;ve listed most of them for you.<br /><br />I will reiterate, in what again is only my personal opinion, that I didn&#039;t care for the romantic angle here, because it really felt at odds with the overall message. Frankly, so did the drunkenness. Listening to your heart and hedonism may sound on the surface to be the same thing, but one is more a conscience thing, and the other is more a &quot;screw everyone else—I&#039;m going to do what I want to do&quot; thing, and Luna comes off as more manipulative than helpful. Really, that thematic dissonance is hurting this story&#039;s impact for me.<br /><br />That said, I don&#039;t have to like a story to recognize that it&#039;s well written, and I don&#039;t see any reason to keep it off the blog if you touch those other things up. And I do enjoy it when princesses go into no-nonsense mode.<br /><br />Edit:<br />Now that I&#039;ve had more time to stew on it, this business with Glinting Steel just bugs me even more. By Luna&#039;s own exaggerated opinion, only half the population would be interested in such an arrangement, and Glinting Steel hasn&#039;t expressed anything but uncomfortableness about it. Even internally, he was barely accepting, and more in an &quot;Oh well, I can&#039;t do anything about it&quot; sense. Does anyone care to find out how he feels about it? Maybe he&#039;s married or in a relationship. And yet the Princesses don&#039;t give that a second&#039;s thought. They attempt to coerce him into being Celestia&#039;s stress-relief boy-toy without any thought to what he might want. And I&#039;m supposed to find this <i>heartwarming?</i> I could see this working in a comedy, where being out of character is more readily acceptable for the sake of humor, but this is really out of sorts with the overall message you&#039;e trying to convey. It&#039;s actually kind of creepy.<br /><br />Like I said, this didn&#039;t affect my verdict on your story, but it does mean I&#039;ll have a different pre-reader take your story on resubmit to see if they share my concern.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Jan 20th, 2014 11:05</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 98

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>It's been a year since Twist earned her cutie mark and a year since she's talked to Applebloom. //
That verb tense is off. Given that you're using a present tense to start, just use simple past later (she talked). And it's "Apple Bloom."

>more fun then Applebloom ever was//

Than/then confusion.

Story:
>Diamond Tiara scanned it and then flashed a hooves-up at Twist.//
This is the third straight sentence (of three total so far) that uses an "and then" construction. It's getting repetitive.

>She had long since established that Applebloom had only valued her for her similar predicament.//

You're kind of glossing over a lot of what would add emotional weight to your story. How does she feel about these past events? If you don't set up that it means much to her now, it kind of defeats the entire premise of your story. And what was her thought process that established it? You throw it out there like I should already know what it is.

>And that's why how the brilliant military strategist//

Extraneous word in there.

>RECESS!//

Italics are preferred for shouting, and the word choice of "chanted" implies they're saying it repeatedly. It might be more effective just to have them do so.

>suavely//

Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Bottom line here is that it'd be a much more interesting read if you described her body language for me so I could visualize this and draw my own conclusion about her mood. When you sum it up for me, it's not as engaging.

>three month//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>thounds//

I'm of two minds on this. First, you're inconsistent about getting every s. However, you have to be careful writing accents and speech impediments. You don't want to make the dialogue difficult to read. Many, many authors overdo the Apples' accent, and it's really not necessary, since the readers know the characters already and will mostly fill it in for you. The same is true of Twist, but she turns up in the show and fanfiction so seldom that you're probably okay here.

>abashed//

Watch the telling again. Show me this.

>"DID SOMEONE SAY CUPCAKES?" a shrill voice screamed from upstairs as Silver Spoon handed over the bits for the cupcakes. She rolled her eyes and mouthed Pinkie Pie.//

Just one speaker per paragraph, please.

>the only remnants sticky mouths and hooves on the Cutie Mark Crusaders//

That's pretty awkwardly phrased and doesn't exactly say what it means.

>Ah remember when ah was friends with Twist.//

If you're going to substitute "Ah" for "I," it needs to be capitalized the same.

>Twist nodded, and crossed her hooves, the shorthand for a Pinkie promise that they had developed.//

Why would this group have adopted Pinkie's routine? Especially after they tried to avoid her—they clearly don't think much of her.

>Twist remembered the day Diamond Tiara and Silver Spoon had invited her to a private picnic at the edge of the Everfree Forest and shown her that there was more to the ponies than what they seemed.//

So, you're going to take the entire exposition that provides the bridge from canon to your story and sum it up in one sentence of narration?

>She said school is in about an hour//

A sleepover on a school night?

>almost-but-not-quite not//

That's a whole lot more convoluted than it needs to be. I'm not sure what that second "not" is doing there.

>ta'//

Apostrophes signify skipped letters. What letter are you skipping here? It's just an imitative spelling (and one that goes overboard for a written accent, for that matter).

>Besides, I technically have a foalsitter. We have an agreement that she is not actually responsible for me.//

Another little item that comes out of left field. These really have the feel of patches put on the story to cover up plot holes, but they're pretty fragile. I don't think you even needed to bring up this subject. The CMCs go around unsupervised all the time.

>Cheerilee stormed back into the school house, her tail switching in sync with her heavy hooffalls.//

So… she's upset that they're fighting… and then immediately leaves them unsupervised?

>Silver Spoon adjusted her glasses and smirked.//

This indentation is inconsistent.

>one-hundred percent real//

That's all one compound modifier.

>So far it was a normal spoon with a round lump of silver at the end that enabled it to be attached to a hoof.//

Canon earth ponies don't seem to have any trouble with the spoons they already have…

>I have received word from your teacher, Miss Cheerilee,

Why does he need to clarify who her teacher is? Seems like the kind of thing she could assume Silver Spoon knew…

>I didn't to have to do this//

Extraneous word.

>Fluttershy' eyes//

Missing letter.

>Rarity quickly stitched a row of sequins onto a slinky dress, and tossed it in a pile.//

I've noticed a few of these, too. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>@&$#%//

First, just write out whatever she said. I can take it. Second, is she really the type to do this? She's the first one to bow to authority. Take her behavior with Babs Seed. She was the one telling them all along to go to Applejack.

>What…..//

Three dots in an ellipsis.

>sugercube//

sugarcube

>she still had the natural hollow bones of a Pegasus//

I don't see how this point is relevant. It's empty filler.

>Besides, the only reason he got into the Wonderbolts Academy was because they needed somewhere to send him after he got kicked out of that reform flight school for wing-size-boosting steroids that backfired.//

Watch the infodump. This really smacks of something Dash would already know if she's actually this close to Scootaloo.

>She's refused to let me see it before she finished.//

Verb tense. If Twilight's already finished, then… she's finished. Right?

>Twist groaned and started to clean up.//

This is a really strange place to end a chapter. It's a completely bland moment. You either want to leave the reader on a cliffhanger or wrap up a plot point. This just… goes nowhere. What possible importance does this final scene have?

There are really two main things keeping me from getting into this story enough to comment on the finer points of character and plot.

First, what emotional content I'm getting is mostly telly or very heavy-handed and overexplained through direct thought. Thought is certainly one avenue to convey mood, but it takes a good mix of things to give an engaging picture of your characters. You need more emotional context, and you need to use a variety of methods of showing to achieve that.

Second, there are a lot of things here that are a significant step away from canon, but that I'm supposed to accept with one sentence of explanation. In canon, Apple Bloom and Twist are friends. Sure, it disheartened Apple Bloom when Twist got her cutie mark, but they didn't get hostile toward each other. And Twist certainly seems like the kind of social outcast that Diamond Tiara and Silver Spoon would continue to prey on. You're not limited to canon, of course, but you're better served using it as your starting point. So when you start right off with Twist as the CMCs' enemy and fast friends with the terrible twosome, it's going to take more than just your word to get me there. You have to connect the dots so that it feels like a natural progression of events instead of just an alternate-universe-type plunge into unexplained differences. There were other such conceits in the story as well, but that was the biggest.

And after five chapters, I still don't have a sense of where the story is going. There's none of this "abandonment" that the title promises. We just have the occasional skirmish between these two factions, but without any direction for why this is happening or any goal that either is working toward. Except for the CMCs' continued pursuit of their cutie marks, but that's pretty standard fare, and it's not evident that that has anything to do with Twist's storyline. You do have conflict in the story, I'll give you that, but it's not working toward anything.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s been a year since Twist earned her cutie mark and a year since she&#039;s talked to Applebloom. //</span><br />That verb tense is off. Given that you&#039;re using a present tense to start, just use simple past later (she talked). And it&#039;s &quot;Apple Bloom.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;more fun then Applebloom ever was//</span><br />Than/then confusion.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond Tiara scanned it and then flashed a hooves-up at Twist.//</span><br />This is the third straight sentence (of three total so far) that uses an &quot;and then&quot; construction. It&#039;s getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had long since established that Applebloom had only valued her for her similar predicament.//</span><br />You&#039;re kind of glossing over a lot of what would add emotional weight to your story. How does she feel about these past events? If you don&#039;t set up that it means much to her now, it kind of defeats the entire premise of your story. And what was her thought process that established it? You throw it out there like I should already know what it is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And that&#039;s why how the brilliant military strategist//</span><br />Extraneous word in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;RECESS!//</span><br />Italics are preferred for shouting, and the word choice of &quot;chanted&quot; implies they&#039;re saying it repeatedly. It might be more effective just to have them do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;suavely//</span><br />Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Bottom line here is that it&#039;d be a much more interesting read if you described her body language for me so I could visualize this and draw my own conclusion about her mood. When you sum it up for me, it&#039;s not as engaging.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;three month//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thounds//</span><br />I&#039;m of two minds on this. First, you&#039;re inconsistent about getting every s. However, you have to be careful writing accents and speech impediments. You don&#039;t want to make the dialogue difficult to read. Many, many authors overdo the Apples&#039; accent, and it&#039;s really not necessary, since the readers know the characters already and will mostly fill it in for you. The same is true of Twist, but she turns up in the show and fanfiction so seldom that you&#039;re probably okay here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;abashed//</span><br />Watch the telling again. Show me this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;DID SOMEONE SAY CUPCAKES?&quot; a shrill voice screamed from upstairs as Silver Spoon handed over the bits for the cupcakes. She rolled her eyes and mouthed <i>Pinkie Pie</i>.//</span><br />Just one speaker per paragraph, please.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the only remnants sticky mouths and hooves on the Cutie Mark Crusaders//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty awkwardly phrased and doesn&#039;t exactly say what it means.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah remember when ah was friends with Twist.//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to substitute &quot;Ah&quot; for &quot;I,&quot; it needs to be capitalized the same.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twist nodded, and crossed her hooves, the shorthand for a Pinkie promise that they had developed.//</span><br />Why would this group have adopted Pinkie&#039;s routine? Especially after they tried to avoid her—they clearly don&#039;t think much of her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twist remembered the day Diamond Tiara and Silver Spoon had invited her to a private picnic at the edge of the Everfree Forest and shown her that there was more to the ponies than what they seemed.//</span><br />So, you&#039;re going to take the entire exposition that provides the bridge from canon to your story and sum it up in one sentence of narration?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She said school is in about an hour//</span><br />A sleepover on a school night?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;almost-but-not-quite not//</span><br />That&#039;s a whole lot more convoluted than it needs to be. I&#039;m not sure what that second &quot;not&quot; is doing there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ta&#039;//</span><br />Apostrophes signify skipped letters. What letter are you skipping here? It&#039;s just an imitative spelling (and one that goes overboard for a written accent, for that matter).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Besides, I technically have a foalsitter. We have an agreement that she is not actually responsible for me.//</span><br />Another little item that comes out of left field. These really have the feel of patches put on the story to cover up plot holes, but they&#039;re pretty fragile. I don&#039;t think you even needed to bring up this subject. The CMCs go around unsupervised all the time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee stormed back into the school house, her tail switching in sync with her heavy hooffalls.//</span><br />So… she&#039;s upset that they&#039;re fighting… and then immediately leaves them unsupervised?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silver Spoon adjusted her glasses and smirked.//</span><br />This indentation is inconsistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one-hundred percent real//</span><br />That&#039;s all one compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So far it was a normal spoon with a round lump of silver at the end that enabled it to be attached to a hoof.//</span><br />Canon earth ponies don&#039;t seem to have any trouble with the spoons they already have…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>I have received word from your teacher, Miss Cheerilee,</i></span><br />Why does he need to clarify who her teacher is? Seems like the kind of thing she could assume Silver Spoon knew…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn&#039;t to have to do this//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy&#039; eyes//</span><br />Missing letter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity quickly stitched a row of sequins onto a slinky dress, and tossed it in a pile.//</span><br />I&#039;ve noticed a few of these, too. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;@&amp;$#%//</span><br />First, just write out whatever she said. I can take it. Second, is she really the type to do this? She&#039;s the first one to bow to authority. Take her behavior with Babs Seed. She was the one telling them all along to go to Applejack.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What…..//</span><br />Three dots in an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sugercube//</span><br />sugarcube<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she still had the natural hollow bones of a Pegasus//</span><br />I don&#039;t see how this point is relevant. It&#039;s empty filler.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Besides, the only reason he got into the Wonderbolts Academy was because they needed somewhere to send him after he got kicked out of that reform flight school for wing-size-boosting steroids that backfired.//</span><br />Watch the infodump. This really smacks of something Dash would already know if she&#039;s actually this close to Scootaloo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She&#039;s refused to let me see it before she finished.//</span><br />Verb tense. If Twilight&#039;s already finished, then… she&#039;s finished. Right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twist groaned and started to clean up.//</span><br />This is a really strange place to end a chapter. It&#039;s a completely bland moment. You either want to leave the reader on a cliffhanger or wrap up a plot point. This just… goes nowhere. What possible importance does this final scene have?<br /><br />There are really two main things keeping me from getting into this story enough to comment on the finer points of character and plot.<br /><br />First, what emotional content I&#039;m getting is mostly telly or very heavy-handed and overexplained through direct thought. Thought is certainly one avenue to convey mood, but it takes a good mix of things to give an engaging picture of your characters. You need more emotional context, and you need to use a variety of methods of showing to achieve that.<br /><br />Second, there are a lot of things here that are a significant step away from canon, but that I&#039;m supposed to accept with one sentence of explanation. In canon, Apple Bloom and Twist are friends. Sure, it disheartened Apple Bloom when Twist got her cutie mark, but they didn&#039;t get hostile toward each other. And Twist certainly seems like the kind of social outcast that Diamond Tiara and Silver Spoon would continue to prey on. You&#039;re not limited to canon, of course, but you&#039;re better served using it as your starting point. So when you start right off with Twist as the CMCs&#039; enemy and fast friends with the terrible twosome, it&#039;s going to take more than just your word to get me there. You have to connect the dots so that it feels like a natural progression of events instead of just an alternate-universe-type plunge into unexplained differences. There were other such conceits in the story as well, but that was the biggest.<br /><br />And after five chapters, I still don&#039;t have a sense of where the story is going. There&#039;s none of this &quot;abandonment&quot; that the title promises. We just have the occasional skirmish between these two factions, but without any direction for why this is happening or any goal that either is working toward. Except for the CMCs&#039; continued pursuit of their cutie marks, but that&#039;s pretty standard fare, and it&#039;s not evident that that has anything to do with Twist&#039;s storyline. You do have conflict in the story, I&#039;ll give you that, but it&#039;s not working toward anything.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 99

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>It can calm a storm, it can help a pony find peace; it can bring a splash of color to a grey world.//
If you'd gone with a comma instead of the semicolon, it would have had the feeling of an incomplete list, which isn't grammatically correct, but is a valid and common enough stylistic device. But by using the semicolon, it really feels like you're going for grammatical correctness, in which case the part before it has a comma splice. If you're trying to create a dramatic pause with the semicolon, I'd recommend an ellipsis instead.

Story:
>Passions rode about her as she trotted slowly down the street. A cold Manehattan alley, as desolate and grey as the filly who walked it. Her mane hung heavily from her head, streaming in the rain.//
A lot to say already. There' just a lot of conflicting information here. "Passions rode about her." That's just a cold fact, and I don't know what it means. If you'd said she was sad or depressed for example, at least I'd know what kind of passions, but even then, it's a lot more effective to give me the evidence that will lead me to deduce her mood (see the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread for a more thorough discussion). A trot as a decently brisk pace. "Trotted slowly" borders on contradictory. Then you tell me she's in a street, then go on to describe it as an alley instead. And if a "mane hung heavily," how would it stream? One connotes a big mass of matted hair hanging straight down, while the other is lighter and windblown. Your second sentence is a fragment, which can work in a stylistic sense, but it doesn't here. Such things are effective as follow-up comments, but you hadn't alluded to any significance of the location.

>Small for her age.//

As a contrast, here's a fragment that works, since it's following from the previous sentence.

>She prodded on//

I have to think you meant "plodded."

>Her course changed, automatically//

There's no reason to have a comma here. Well, actually, it needs to go after that word. See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Chewing, she trotted toward one of the sicker colts and pulled out a bottle and a spoon.//

Be careful that you don't get repetitive with your sentence structures. This is the third in a row and the fifth in the paragraph to use a participle.

>poured a measured amount of thick amber liquid onto the spoon//

"Into" would be more accurate.

>purple eyes growing wide with wonder and awe//

Yeah, watch the telling.

>The lid was lifted to reveal the brass notes inside//

The passive voice isn't helping here. It's better to keep things active unless there's a good reason for using the passive voice to shift focus, and you haven't assigned any importance to this lid. I'm quite experienced in music, but admittedly, piano isn't my specialty. Still, I've never heard of any of the pieces inside referred to as "notes," though I'll defer to you if you know that to be a technical term for the hardware.

>Its keys were pristine//

>the whole piano was aged
More contradictory language. Make up your mind.

>She had no words but words were not was she needed.//

Typo. Plus another missing comma.

>She slipped onto the bench and set her hooves on the old, strong instrument before her.//

Where? I mean, if you're bothering to say what she's doing with her hooves, you could at least say she's putting them on the pedals.

>She trembled at it's magnitude//

Its/it's confusion.

>violaceous//

Is there a reason this word is more suitable than "violet"? If you have a good one, then by all means use it. If it has a slight difference of meaning or provides a better rhythm to the sentence, fine. But I can't see anything other than the desire to use a fancier word.

So, where did these kids get a piano? It's implied that Octavia goes there regularly, so she would have noticed it before. It doesn't surprise her? She doesn't want to know how they acquired it and got it there?

>mauve//

That's a rather different color than violet.

>"Is he gonna be okay?" She squeaked.//

Dialogue capitalization. I have a section on that up top, too.

>Deeply moved by this site//

You've confused "site" with "sight."

>smiled in quiet content//

Besides being telly, you want "contentment."

>Though Octavia did not catch his eye, he could feel her acknowledgement.//

Your perspective wanders around a lot. We're mostly with Octavia, but then you occasionally go into the collective of the children, and then here, you've shifted into a particular colt. Besides Octavia, you never stay with any of these perspectives for long. You're in Time's head for only a few sentences, which begs the question of if it's necessary at all. Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>Her complicated expression//

How do I know it's complicated if you won't let me see it?

>The room was large enough to cook and banquet and thrice that size.//

Maybe it's just a syntax issue, but I can't figure out what the "thrice that size" means.

>She happily left them, swerving onto a street and galloping for the inner city.//

Another issue with all the participles you use is that they're prime candidates for misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like "them" is what's "swerving onto a street."

>She had her mother to watch out for.//

Given what follows, and what that implies about what you meant here, I think you need a "her" at the end.

>Not every filly or colt made it safely to freedom, take that as one may.//

Perhaps not, but at a lower success rate than fending for themselves?

>They would never know what had become of him.//

Why not? If he gets adopted or placed somewhere, what's to prevent him from visiting? I certainly haven't seen any indoctrination of these children that teaches them to break off all contact if they leave.

>an air of grace//

>gracefully/
Just a few sentences apart. Watch the repetition.

>orchid colored//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>He gave some small quip//

And we don't get to know what it was? Otherwise, this just comes across as empty filler.

>thunderous booms//

Not sure how you'd get a cello to make a sound like this.

>She pursed his lips//

You meant "her," right?

There's a lot of telly language in here, which is an especially bad thing for a story driven entirely by emotion. It's also just chock full of odd phrasings. I'm having a little trouble telling whether this stems from thesaurus abuse or someone who's not familiar with the language.

Also, there's not really a story here. There's a nice sentiment, but a story needs conflict or character growth. On the conflict side, what's at stake for Octavia? Worry that someone will discover she's helping these foals? Fear that the time she's spending with them is taking away from her other interests? I don't see anything. We need to see clearly that something is at stake, that someone wants something and takes a risk for it and what bad thing will happen if she doesn't get it. Or on the character side, what new insight do we get to see about her? What surprising thing do we learn about her, or even better, that she learns about herself? There's really nothing along those lines, either. Yes, it's different that she's halping these children, but that happens throughout the story. It's not something that's built up and revealed as a surprise. It's just a series of scenes of poor Octavia worried about these children, but not doing anything outlandish or risky to help them. It also sets her up as a bit of a Sympathy Sue character, where everything goes just perfectly wrong for her.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It can calm a storm, it can help a pony find peace; it can bring a splash of color to a grey world.//</span><br />If you&#039;d gone with a comma instead of the semicolon, it would have had the feeling of an incomplete list, which isn&#039;t grammatically correct, but is a valid and common enough stylistic device. But by using the semicolon, it really feels like you&#039;re going for grammatical correctness, in which case the part before it has a comma splice. If you&#039;re trying to create a dramatic pause with the semicolon, I&#039;d recommend an ellipsis instead.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Passions rode about her as she trotted slowly down the street. A cold Manehattan alley, as desolate and grey as the filly who walked it. Her mane hung heavily from her head, streaming in the rain.//</span><br />A lot to say already. There&#039; just a lot of conflicting information here. &quot;Passions rode about her.&quot; That&#039;s just a cold fact, and I don&#039;t know what it means. If you&#039;d said she was sad or depressed for example, at least I&#039;d know what kind of passions, but even then, it&#039;s a lot more effective to give me the evidence that will lead me to deduce her mood (see the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread for a more thorough discussion). A trot as a decently brisk pace. &quot;Trotted slowly&quot; borders on contradictory. Then you tell me she&#039;s in a street, then go on to describe it as an alley instead. And if a &quot;mane hung heavily,&quot; how would it stream? One connotes a big mass of matted hair hanging straight down, while the other is lighter and windblown. Your second sentence is a fragment, which can work in a stylistic sense, but it doesn&#039;t here. Such things are effective as follow-up comments, but you hadn&#039;t alluded to any significance of the location.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Small for her age.//</span><br />As a contrast, here&#039;s a fragment that works, since it&#039;s following from the previous sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She prodded on//</span><br />I have to think you meant &quot;plodded.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her course changed, automatically//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason to have a comma here. Well, actually, it needs to go after that word. See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chewing, she trotted toward one of the sicker colts and pulled out a bottle and a spoon.//</span><br />Be careful that you don&#039;t get repetitive with your sentence structures. This is the third in a row and the fifth in the paragraph to use a participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;poured a measured amount of thick amber liquid onto the spoon//</span><br />&quot;Into&quot; would be more accurate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;purple eyes growing wide with wonder and awe//</span><br />Yeah, watch the telling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The lid was lifted to reveal the brass notes inside//</span><br />The passive voice isn&#039;t helping here. It&#039;s better to keep things active unless there&#039;s a good reason for using the passive voice to shift focus, and you haven&#039;t assigned any importance to this lid. I&#039;m quite experienced in music, but admittedly, piano isn&#039;t my specialty. Still, I&#039;ve never heard of any of the pieces inside referred to as &quot;notes,&quot; though I&#039;ll defer to you if you know that to be a technical term for the hardware.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Its keys were pristine//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the whole piano was aged</span><br />More contradictory language. Make up your mind.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had no words but words were not was she needed.//</span><br />Typo. Plus another missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She slipped onto the bench and set her hooves on the old, strong instrument before her.//</span><br />Where? I mean, if you&#039;re bothering to say what she&#039;s doing with her hooves, you could at least say she&#039;s putting them on the pedals.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trembled at it&#039;s magnitude//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;violaceous//</span><br />Is there a reason this word is more suitable than &quot;violet&quot;? If you have a good one, then by all means use it. If it has a slight difference of meaning or provides a better rhythm to the sentence, fine. But I can&#039;t see anything other than the desire to use a fancier word.<br /><br />So, where did these kids get a piano? It&#039;s implied that Octavia goes there regularly, so she would have noticed it before. It doesn&#039;t surprise her? She doesn&#039;t want to know how they acquired it and got it there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mauve//</span><br />That&#039;s a rather different color than violet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Is he gonna be okay?&quot; She squeaked.//</span><br />Dialogue capitalization. I have a section on that up top, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Deeply moved by this site//</span><br />You&#039;ve confused &quot;site&quot; with &quot;sight.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;smiled in quiet content//</span><br />Besides being telly, you want &quot;contentment.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Though Octavia did not catch his eye, he could feel her acknowledgement.//</span><br />Your perspective wanders around a lot. We&#039;re mostly with Octavia, but then you occasionally go into the collective of the children, and then here, you&#039;ve shifted into a particular colt. Besides Octavia, you never stay with any of these perspectives for long. You&#039;re in Time&#039;s head for only a few sentences, which begs the question of if it&#039;s necessary at all. Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her complicated expression//</span><br />How do I know it&#039;s complicated if you won&#039;t let me see it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The room was large enough to cook and banquet and thrice that size.//</span><br />Maybe it&#039;s just a syntax issue, but I can&#039;t figure out what the &quot;thrice that size&quot; means.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She happily left them, swerving onto a street and galloping for the inner city.//</span><br />Another issue with all the participles you use is that they&#039;re prime candidates for misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like &quot;them&quot; is what&#039;s &quot;swerving onto a street.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had her mother to watch out for.//</span><br />Given what follows, and what that implies about what you meant here, I think you need a &quot;her&quot; at the end.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not every filly or colt made it safely to freedom, take that as one may.//</span><br />Perhaps not, but at a lower success rate than fending for themselves?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They would never know what had become of him.//</span><br />Why not? If he gets adopted or placed somewhere, what&#039;s to prevent him from visiting? I certainly haven&#039;t seen any indoctrination of these children that teaches them to break off all contact if they leave.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an air of grace//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gracefully/</span><br />Just a few sentences apart. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;orchid colored//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He gave some small quip//</span><br />And we don&#039;t get to know what it was? Otherwise, this just comes across as empty filler.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thunderous booms//</span><br />Not sure how you&#039;d get a cello to make a sound like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She pursed his lips//</span><br />You meant &quot;her,&quot; right?<br /><br />There&#039;s a lot of telly language in here, which is an especially bad thing for a story driven entirely by emotion. It&#039;s also just chock full of odd phrasings. I&#039;m having a little trouble telling whether this stems from thesaurus abuse or someone who&#039;s not familiar with the language.<br /><br />Also, there&#039;s not really a story here. There&#039;s a nice sentiment, but a story needs conflict or character growth. On the conflict side, what&#039;s at stake for Octavia? Worry that someone will discover she&#039;s helping these foals? Fear that the time she&#039;s spending with them is taking away from her other interests? I don&#039;t see anything. We need to see clearly that something is at stake, that someone wants something and takes a risk for it and what bad thing will happen if she doesn&#039;t get it. Or on the character side, what new insight do we get to see about her? What surprising thing do we learn about her, or even better, that she learns about herself? There&#039;s really nothing along those lines, either. Yes, it&#039;s different that she&#039;s halping these children, but that happens throughout the story. It&#039;s not something that&#039;s built up and revealed as a surprise. It&#039;s just a series of scenes of poor Octavia worried about these children, but not doing anything outlandish or risky to help them. It also sets her up as a bit of a Sympathy Sue character, where everything goes just perfectly wrong for her.<br />

Luna1337Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 100

>>129536

Thanks! I'll fix everything you pointed out, get an actual editor for the next few chapters, and hopefully get something that doesn't make your eyes bleed!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129536" onclick="return highlight('129536', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129536">&gt;&gt;129536</a><br /><br />Thanks! I&#039;ll fix everything you pointed out, get an actual editor for the next few chapters, and hopefully get something that doesn&#039;t make your eyes bleed!<br />

Seether00Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 101

>>129518

>She returned with a tumbler and a bottle of scotch held aloft in her magic//

Okay, you kind of veered off the track there. She's never dealt with any interpersonal crises remotely like this, even ons involving her friends, even ones that were her fault. Look at how she behaved in "Magical Mystery Cure" after being th one who caused all the trouble. And despite canon instances of cider (maybe not) and salt licks (definitely) being intoxicating substances, she's never seen to care much for either one.

>I don’t she’s dealt with anything of this magnitude. It’s hard to equate the seriousness of not being able to have children with the cutie mark switch. I’ve included drinking, as have other authors.I believe it’s appropriate given her state of mind.


>The Princess had me undergo a full examination by the best doctors and mages in Canterlot. My thaum count was off the charts//

And so it never occurred to her that magic might affect her friends like this? She's cast spells on all of them at times.

>Twilight doesn’t consider the Elements to be capable of a negative result. Also exposure to magic and channeling are two different things in this story. I’ve changed some wording to make it clearer.



>We got traditions, and one of them is that you only become an Apple by birth or marriage.//

Hm. Given a certain recent episode, you might need to rethink this.

>I’ve added a nod to that episode now. I think Pinkie is related and I’m going Applejack believing that as well. I think I can get away with it.


>a bucket of horse manure//

This just sounds odd to me. Isn't this like one of us saying, "This is a toilet of people crap!"

>>It may sound odd, but myself and both my editors really like it the way it is.


I liked this story. I really did.
>> Glad you liked it.


If this is the type of thing they normally scan for during a physical, wouldn't it also be pretty public knowledge? I mean, everyone knows radiation is a bad thing, but there's a certain amount everyone gets that doesn't hurt anything. If you get exposed to a large amount, you know that's a bad thing. Though that's not really something they check for in a physical, so say something like cholesterol. I just have a hard time believing that this is catching them by surprise so much. And why is the effect so specific to reproduction? It's not possibly going to cause any other health problems? That would seem to be an evolution toward limiting the gene pool for strong magic users, which… well, I'm not sure what implications that would have. Is this also specific to females? If so, why? If not, why wouldn't someone like Starswirl already know about it? For that matter, during "Magic Duel," Twilight refers to "high level unicorns" who can cast age spells. So there are very powerful unicorns out there. Do they have the same problem? What about Spike? He's been subjected to an awful lot of magic.

>> As for why they don’t experience other problems. I’ve added some lines about how channeling too much magic is different from just exposure, over-channeling being bad. Also, the theme is more about a cosmic sacrifice for saving the world. That idea and other problems they could potentially have are subjects for later chapters. I didn’t feel it would throwing all those ideas into the first chapter.

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129518" onclick="return highlight('129518', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129518">&gt;&gt;129518</a><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She returned with a tumbler and a bottle of scotch held aloft in her magic//</span><br />Okay, you kind of veered off the track there. She&#039;s never dealt with any interpersonal crises remotely like this, even ons involving her friends, even ones that were her fault. Look at how she behaved in &quot;Magical Mystery Cure&quot; after being th one who caused all the trouble. And despite canon instances of cider (maybe not) and salt licks (definitely) being intoxicating substances, she&#039;s never seen to care much for either one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t she’s dealt with anything of this magnitude. It’s hard to equate the seriousness of not being able to have children with the cutie mark switch. I’ve included drinking, as have other authors.I believe it’s appropriate given her state of mind.</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Princess had me undergo a full examination by the best doctors and mages in Canterlot. My thaum count was off the charts//</span><br />And so it never occurred to her that magic might affect her friends like this? She&#039;s cast spells on all of them at times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight doesn’t consider the Elements to be capable of a negative result. Also exposure to magic and channeling are two different things in this story. I’ve changed some wording to make it clearer. </span><br /><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We got traditions, and one of them is that you only become an Apple by birth or marriage.//</span><br />Hm. Given a certain recent episode, you might need to rethink this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve added a nod to that episode now. I think Pinkie is related and I’m going Applejack believing that as well. I think I can get away with it.</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bucket of horse manure//</span><br />This just sounds odd to me. Isn&#039;t this like one of us saying, &quot;This is a toilet of people crap!&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt;It may sound odd, but myself and both my editors really like it the way it is. </span><br /><br />I liked this story. I really did. <br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt; Glad you liked it.</span><br /><br /><br />If this is the type of thing they normally scan for during a physical, wouldn&#039;t it also be pretty public knowledge? I mean, everyone knows radiation is a bad thing, but there&#039;s a certain amount everyone gets that doesn&#039;t hurt anything. If you get exposed to a large amount, you know that&#039;s a bad thing. Though that&#039;s not really something they check for in a physical, so say something like cholesterol. I just have a hard time believing that this is catching them by surprise so much. And why is the effect so specific to reproduction? It&#039;s not possibly going to cause any other health problems? That would seem to be an evolution toward limiting the gene pool for strong magic users, which… well, I&#039;m not sure what implications that would have. Is this also specific to females? If so, why? If not, why wouldn&#039;t someone like Starswirl already know about it? For that matter, during &quot;Magic Duel,&quot; Twilight refers to &quot;high level unicorns&quot; who can cast age spells. So there are very powerful unicorns out there. Do they have the same problem? What about Spike? He&#039;s been subjected to an awful lot of magic. <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt; As for why they don’t experience other problems. I’ve added some lines about how channeling too much magic is different from just exposure, over-channeling being bad. Also, the theme is more about a cosmic sacrifice for saving the world. That idea and other problems they could potentially have are subjects for later chapters. I didn’t feel it would throwing all those ideas into the first chapter.</span><br />

Seether00Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 102

>>129518
>>129518

>She returned with a tumbler and a bottle of scotch held aloft in her magic//

Okay, you kind of veered off the track there. She's never dealt with any interpersonal crises remotely like this, even ons involving her friends, even ones that were her fault. Look at how she behaved in "Magical Mystery Cure" after being th one who caused all the trouble. And despite canon instances of cider (maybe not) and salt licks (definitely) being intoxicating substances, she's never seen to care much for either one.

>I don’t she’s dealt with anything of this magnitude. It’s hard to equate the seriousness of not being able to have children with the cutie mark switch. I’ve included drinking, as have other authors.I believe it’s appropriate given her state of mind.


>The Princess had me undergo a full examination by the best doctors and mages in Canterlot. My thaum count was off the charts//

And so it never occurred to her that magic might affect her friends like this? She's cast spells on all of them at times.

>Twilight doesn’t consider the Elements to be capable of a negative result. Also exposure to magic and channeling are two different things in this story. I’ve changed some wording to make it clearer.



>We got traditions, and one of them is that you only become an Apple by birth or marriage.//

Hm. Given a certain recent episode, you might need to rethink this.

>I’ve added a nod to that episode now. I think Pinkie is related and I’m going Applejack believing that as well. I think I can get away with it.


>a bucket of horse manure//

This just sounds odd to me. Isn't this like one of us saying, "This is a toilet of people crap!"

>>It may sound odd, but myself and both my editors really like it the way it is.


I liked this story. I really did.
>> Glad you liked it.


If this is the type of thing they normally scan for during a physical, wouldn't it also be pretty public knowledge? I mean, everyone knows radiation is a bad thing, but there's a certain amount everyone gets that doesn't hurt anything. If you get exposed to a large amount, you know that's a bad thing. Though that's not really something they check for in a physical, so say something like cholesterol. I just have a hard time believing that this is catching them by surprise so much. And why is the effect so specific to reproduction? It's not possibly going to cause any other health problems? That would seem to be an evolution toward limiting the gene pool for strong magic users, which… well, I'm not sure what implications that would have. Is this also specific to females? If so, why? If not, why wouldn't someone like Starswirl already know about it? For that matter, during "Magic Duel," Twilight refers to "high level unicorns" who can cast age spells. So there are very powerful unicorns out there. Do they have the same problem? What about Spike? He's been subjected to an awful lot of magic.

>> As for why they don’t experience other problems. I’ve added some lines about how channeling too much magic is different from just exposure, over-channeling being bad. Also, the theme is more about a cosmic sacrifice for saving the world. That idea and other problems they could potentially have are subjects for later chapters. I didn’t feel it would throwing all those ideas into the first chapter.

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129518" onclick="return highlight('129518', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129518">&gt;&gt;129518</a><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129518" onclick="return highlight('129518', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129518">&gt;&gt;129518</a><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She returned with a tumbler and a bottle of scotch held aloft in her magic//</span><br />Okay, you kind of veered off the track there. She&#039;s never dealt with any interpersonal crises remotely like this, even ons involving her friends, even ones that were her fault. Look at how she behaved in &quot;Magical Mystery Cure&quot; after being th one who caused all the trouble. And despite canon instances of cider (maybe not) and salt licks (definitely) being intoxicating substances, she&#039;s never seen to care much for either one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t she’s dealt with anything of this magnitude. It’s hard to equate the seriousness of not being able to have children with the cutie mark switch. I’ve included drinking, as have other authors.I believe it’s appropriate given her state of mind.</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Princess had me undergo a full examination by the best doctors and mages in Canterlot. My thaum count was off the charts//</span><br />And so it never occurred to her that magic might affect her friends like this? She&#039;s cast spells on all of them at times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight doesn’t consider the Elements to be capable of a negative result. Also exposure to magic and channeling are two different things in this story. I’ve changed some wording to make it clearer. </span><br /><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We got traditions, and one of them is that you only become an Apple by birth or marriage.//</span><br />Hm. Given a certain recent episode, you might need to rethink this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve added a nod to that episode now. I think Pinkie is related and I’m going Applejack believing that as well. I think I can get away with it.</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bucket of horse manure//</span><br />This just sounds odd to me. Isn&#039;t this like one of us saying, &quot;This is a toilet of people crap!&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt;It may sound odd, but myself and both my editors really like it the way it is. </span><br /><br />I liked this story. I really did. <br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt; Glad you liked it.</span><br /><br /><br />If this is the type of thing they normally scan for during a physical, wouldn&#039;t it also be pretty public knowledge? I mean, everyone knows radiation is a bad thing, but there&#039;s a certain amount everyone gets that doesn&#039;t hurt anything. If you get exposed to a large amount, you know that&#039;s a bad thing. Though that&#039;s not really something they check for in a physical, so say something like cholesterol. I just have a hard time believing that this is catching them by surprise so much. And why is the effect so specific to reproduction? It&#039;s not possibly going to cause any other health problems? That would seem to be an evolution toward limiting the gene pool for strong magic users, which… well, I&#039;m not sure what implications that would have. Is this also specific to females? If so, why? If not, why wouldn&#039;t someone like Starswirl already know about it? For that matter, during &quot;Magic Duel,&quot; Twilight refers to &quot;high level unicorns&quot; who can cast age spells. So there are very powerful unicorns out there. Do they have the same problem? What about Spike? He&#039;s been subjected to an awful lot of magic. <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt; As for why they don’t experience other problems. I’ve added some lines about how channeling too much magic is different from just exposure, over-channeling being bad. Also, the theme is more about a cosmic sacrifice for saving the world. That idea and other problems they could potentially have are subjects for later chapters. I didn’t feel it would throwing all those ideas into the first chapter.</span><br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 103

>>129555
>I don’t she’s dealt with anything of this magnitude. It’s hard to equate the seriousness of not being able to have children with the cutie mark switch. I’ve included drinking, as have other authors.I believe it’s appropriate given her state of mind.
But she has, when she discovered her own sterility. When people resort to drink over a shock, it's a shock of their own. She's surprised to find out her friends have been affected, but it'd be odd for her to bolt down some booze on their behalf. And she's shown no signs of feeling like she's the one responsible—she doesn't get apologetic about it—so she's not really bolstering herself against anything. If there were some outward signs that she was getting to be an emotional wreck over this, then I could see it.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129555" onclick="return highlight('129555', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129555">&gt;&gt;129555</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t she’s dealt with anything of this magnitude. It’s hard to equate the seriousness of not being able to have children with the cutie mark switch. I’ve included drinking, as have other authors.I believe it’s appropriate given her state of mind.</span><br />But she has, when she discovered her own sterility. When people resort to drink over a shock, it&#039;s a shock of their own. She&#039;s surprised to find out her friends have been affected, but it&#039;d be odd for her to bolt down some booze on their behalf. And she&#039;s shown no signs of feeling like she&#039;s the one responsible—she doesn&#039;t get apologetic about it—so she&#039;s not really bolstering herself against anything. If there were some outward signs that she was getting to be an emotional wreck over this, then I could see it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 104

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
You've split this into three paragraphs, but you don't leave a line break between them, so the formatting looks off.

Story:
You have a bit of a weather report opening, but at least it's got something to do with the immediate happenings, which is better than the vast majority of authors who use one.

>hoping to catch a flake or two before their mouth dried out//

Unless they all share a single mouth, you need a plural.

>tucked away in an ally//

Given that you probably know we do not accept clop, I'll assume you meant to say "alley."

>this?//

The standard is to italicize ! or ? when it's on an italicized word.

>Mr. and Mrs. Cake place a gingerbread mansion//

Why the switch to present tense?

>confused but still happy//

You've skirted the line a couple of times, but this is blatantly telly. Doing so is excusable for Twilight about herself, since she's a first-person narrator, but you shouldn't be about everyone else. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>the parent rehearsals//

I'm guessing you meant "pageant."

>Pinkie attested//

Two things: have a look at the section on saidisms as well, and this is just an odd word choice anyway. The connotation is that she's bearing witness or offering proof, but she wasn't there.

>Applebloom, Applejack's younger sister.//

Apple Bloom. And you can assume your readers will know who she is.

>leading me to believe it was full of bits//

This is rather direct. You could leave this off altogether, and I think it'd be clear, but you could say "jingled with bits" if you think it needs more. As is, it holds the reader's hand a little too much.

>OHMIGOSH!//

Italics are preferred for emphasis.

>Appleblooms'//

Misused apostrophe.

>who only grinned in response//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>It's needles were a bright, minty green and were bunched in tight groups that looked almost like flower buds. The trunk was about as thick as a lamp post, and it was covered by bark in a deep brown color that reminded me of hot chocolate.//

It's/its confusion. Also look at the number of "to be" verbs you use in this description. They're inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You ought to be using active verbs. It's worth scanning the entire story for these.

> Finally the fluorescent color caught my eye and I snatched the tag with my magic before it could disappear again.//

And again, separate the clauses with a comma. Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Fif- fifty//

Don't leave a space in a stutter.

>Applebloom seemed to be panicking.//

I'm not going to point out every area where telling seems out of place to me, but this is one. What is Apple Bloom doing that leads Twilight to draw this conclusion?

>what it would like like//

I think you'll see the problem.

>She too them graciously, running off to find her brother.//

Typo. One other thing—participles imply concurrent action, but she wouldn't run off until after she'd taken the money.

>She seemed to notice me for the first time.//

"Seem" is almost as boring a verb as "to be," though it's more tolerable in that it doesn't get used nearly as much. But this is already the second use in this scene.

>I remembered, thinking back to last year when she had insisted she cover this trimming for the Canterlot city tree.//

That's just awkwardly phrased all over.

>Hearth's warming//

Capitalization.

>"I suppose."//

And I'm finally going to say I don't get Twilight's mood. She's been Ms. Grump the whole time. She's normally very friendly and accommodating of Pinkie's ramblings. Why is she being so standoffish? It's really creating a dissonance with me that she's not acting like Twilight. If you end up explaining it later, it might work out, but it doesn't seem to be heading that way.

>24//

Spell out numbers this short.

>perfectly vertical, and it looked beautiful in the library. "There! It's perfect!"//

Watch the word repetition. You used this one again just a couple of paragraphs back.

>"I thought we should wait until tomorrow." I told her//

Dialogue punctuation.

>cook– eat ginger– well, we can eat!//

Either put spaces on both sides of your dashes or go without spaces altogether.

>to join Pinkie and I//

People often use this phrasing wrong while trying to avoid the more common ways of using it wrong. It's "Pinkie and me." It's part of a compound firect object of the verb "join." Try removing Pinkie from it, and then see what works. "To join I." That's obviously wrong.

>Pinkie trotted out from behind the tree, holding a top hat filled with papers.//

Given the sheer number of participial phrases you use, I'd also caution you that they're often misplaced modifiers. By theor proximity in the sentence, the "holding…" phrase describes the tree. While I can apply a bit of logic to sort it out, you will eventually write something that's ambiguous or outright misleading, if you're not careful.

>I smiled, tucking the paper away.//

And to add to my "given the sheer number of participial phrases you use" from the last comment… Over the past 8 sentences, you use the "<main clause>, <participial phrase>" structure 5 times. And there are more over the next few paragraphs, I see. You're getting into a rut of sentence structure that you didn't have early in the story. Back then, you had more simple and compound sentences, which are so common that they pass unnoticed, as long as you break them up once in a while with something different. But these more elaborate structures stand out more when they get repeated.

>as she thought about what to get for her pony//

Watch your perspective. How would Twilight know this was what Pinkie was thinking?

>"Well, Pinkie probably has some sugary concoction that'll wake you up," I gave her a gentle nudge with my elbow.//

Punctuation. Your attribution has no speaking action, so it needs to be a separate sentence.

>Her accent grew thicker when she was tired out.//

This is your fifth use of "tired" in the last ten paragraphs.

>Applejack seemed to be perking up when there was a knock at the door.//

Watch what this implies. Without a comma, as you have it, it implies the knock was what perked her up. With a comma, it would merely give a chronology, which is what you want.

>Uh-I'm comin'//

Use a dash here, not a hyphen.

>Looks like a gotta be headin' off.//

Seems like you were trying for the common "Ah" imitative spelling. Note that it needs to be capitalized, since it's a stand-in for "I." However let me dissuade you from writing her accent to that degree. Imitative spellings are rarely necessary, and too many just slow the reader down. Readers already know how she sounds and will fill that in for you. It's more about phrasing and word choice.

>bravely//

What about it leads Twilight to conclude it's brave? It adds more power if you make me conclude that instead of feeding it to me.

>Yeah, what gives AJ?//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>Applejack looked instantly relieved. "Thanks." She stepped outside, looking very at home between her siblings.//

Show me!

>We had a long discussion, leading us nowhere but in endless circles, but still bringing up plenty of unpleasant possibilities. We finally disbanded a few hours later, feeling sick with worry about the Apple Family. I knew for sure that five sleepless nights were to come.//

Yow. You're sure glossing over a ton of the emotional context of the story here. You don't have to take me through the evening minute by minute, but seeing everyone's concern is a whole lot different than having it summed up for me.

>I laid awake for a long time//

Lay/lie confusion.

>So they just don't celebrate.//

As long as most of these ponies have known her, none of them ever knew this? I hope you end up explaining…

>T-this//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated. "Th-this," surely.

>Did this every year," Pinkie explained, "And I always fall asleep…//

Don't capitalize the second part of the quote when you continue it like this, as long as the two parts of the quote join into a single, valid sentence.

>Twi//

Apple Bloom's never called her that in canon, and I think she'd show more respect to an adult than that.

>ornament of needle or branch out of place//

Typo.

>My backyard//

Isn't her backyard a street?

>gingerbreadmare//

Gingerbread man isn't a single word, so why would this be?

>feeding her rabbit, Angel//

Again, this is something you can assume the reader will know. Just say she's feeding Angel.

>rather pompously//

Why would she make such a judgment about herself? If it's for an effect, she'd say what that effect was. It's not the time for self-deprecation.

>"Fluttershy and I agreed that you aren't having enough fun," I told them both, "So we're going to have a snowball fight."//

Quote capitalization again.

>a stack of freezing snowballs//

Kind of a redundant description, unless you literally mean they're still in the process of freezing.

>Despite the seriousness with which I'm telling this//

This is a mistake. First, it kicks me out of the moment, since it suggests that the whole thing is actually an after-the-fact retelling of a past event. Second, it addresses me directly. You haven't done so as yet, so it's out of place, and it also opens the can of worms of needing to define my role. Why is she telling me this story? Why do I want to listen? Best to avoid that.

>We aren't sure who won//

Another inexplicable shift to present tense.

>9//

Write it out.

>once empty//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>I rolled my eyes, laying them on top of the sled.//

Vague antecedent. It sounds like she's laying her eyes on the sled.

>I didn't even have to come from me//

You meant "it," right?

>I hooked the clasp on the antlers under my chin, snatching the sled and the scroll as I flew out the door.//

Participles and "as" clauses both imply concurrent actions, so all of these happen at the same time. That doesn't quite work.

>Over hills and down a small dirt path laid Sweet Apple Acres//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>to be sure she was awake//

Missing period.

>I stopped minute//

Missing word.

> I was starting to hear the wheezing breaths of Applebloom as she rushing through the snow to catch up//

Odd choice of verb tense for the first part, and it's outright wrong for the second.

Well, here's where I usually rehash the major problems and bring up overall ones. So, watch the commas, space your dashes right, watch the repetitive sentence structures and ponderous use of participles, and show, don't tell. And you only use "said" 7 times as a dialogue tag out of approximately 250 quotes. I've explained the rationale for why that's problematic in the portion of the thread I referred you to, but I wanted to add the numbers here, so you could see how extreme it was.

The only other thing I want to bring up is—well, aside from Twilight's odd mood through the first couple of scenes, which I mentioned earlier—that the conflict is pretty weak here. There's certainly a conflict from Applejack's point of view, but we don't see that. We get Twilight's point of view, and she certainly does debate how to deal with the situation, but then the solution just drops in her lap. It's a classic deus ex machina. She wasn't particularly beating her head over what to do about it either, so it wasn't like a huge conundrum that was eating her up. It's a bit understated to have much impact. Now, getting back to Applejack. You emphasize how much pride she has, and I tend to agree with you there. But she's immediately willing to swallow that pride? I doubt it. But I have no indication otherwise. You gloss over Applejack's reaction in the short final scene and basically summarize it such that she admitted everything openly and freely. How she talked to them is at least as important as what she said, and you're missing out on a lot of this story's punch by declining to show me this. There's your conflict. It can be shown externally through Twilight's perception—that is, you don't need to transfer into Applejack's point of view to get at it. That's certainly not the only way to bring some real conflict into the story, but I think it's the one that most clearly presents itself.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br />You&#039;ve split this into three paragraphs, but you don&#039;t leave a line break between them, so the formatting looks off.<br /><br />Story:<br />You have a bit of a weather report opening, but at least it&#039;s got something to do with the immediate happenings, which is better than the vast majority of authors who use one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoping to catch a flake or two before their mouth dried out//</span><br />Unless they all share a single mouth, you need a plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tucked away in an ally//</span><br />Given that you probably know we do not accept clop, I&#039;ll assume you meant to say &quot;alley.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>this</i>?//</span><br />The standard is to italicize ! or ? when it&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mr. and Mrs. Cake place a gingerbread mansion//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;confused but still happy//</span><br />You&#039;ve skirted the line a couple of times, but this is blatantly telly. Doing so is excusable for Twilight about herself, since she&#039;s a first-person narrator, but you shouldn&#039;t be about everyone else. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the parent rehearsals//</span><br />I&#039;m guessing you meant &quot;pageant.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie attested//</span><br />Two things: have a look at the section on saidisms as well, and this is just an odd word choice anyway. The connotation is that she&#039;s bearing witness or offering proof, but she wasn&#039;t there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom, Applejack&#039;s younger sister.//</span><br />Apple Bloom. And you can assume your readers will know who she is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leading me to believe it was full of bits//</span><br />This is rather direct. You could leave this off altogether, and I think it&#039;d be clear, but you could say &quot;jingled with bits&quot; if you think it needs more. As is, it holds the reader&#039;s hand a little too much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;OHMIGOSH!//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Appleblooms&#039;//</span><br />Misused apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who only grinned in response//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s needles were a bright, minty green and were bunched in tight groups that looked almost like flower buds. The trunk was about as thick as a lamp post, and it was covered by bark in a deep brown color that reminded me of hot chocolate.//</span><br />It&#039;s/its confusion. Also look at the number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs you use in this description. They&#039;re inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You ought to be using active verbs. It&#039;s worth scanning the entire story for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; Finally the fluorescent color caught my eye and I snatched the tag with my magic before it could disappear again.//</span><br />And again, separate the clauses with a comma. Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fif- fifty//</span><br />Don&#039;t leave a space in a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom seemed to be panicking.//</span><br />I&#039;m not going to point out every area where telling seems out of place to me, but this is one. What is Apple Bloom doing that leads Twilight to draw this conclusion?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;what it would like like//</span><br />I think you&#039;ll see the problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She too them graciously, running off to find her brother.//</span><br />Typo. One other thing—participles imply concurrent action, but she wouldn&#039;t run off until after she&#039;d taken the money.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She seemed to notice me for the first time.//</span><br />&quot;Seem&quot; is almost as boring a verb as &quot;to be,&quot; though it&#039;s more tolerable in that it doesn&#039;t get used nearly as much. But this is already the second use in this scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I remembered, thinking back to last year when she had insisted she cover this trimming for the Canterlot city tree.//</span><br />That&#039;s just awkwardly phrased all over.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearth&#039;s warming//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I suppose.&quot;//</span><br />And I&#039;m finally going to say I don&#039;t get Twilight&#039;s mood. She&#039;s been Ms. Grump the whole time. She&#039;s normally very friendly and accommodating of Pinkie&#039;s ramblings. Why is she being so standoffish? It&#039;s really creating a dissonance with me that she&#039;s not acting like Twilight. If you end up explaining it later, it might work out, but it doesn&#039;t seem to be heading that way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;24//</span><br />Spell out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;perfectly vertical, and it looked beautiful in the library. &quot;There! It&#039;s perfect!&quot;//</span><br />Watch the word repetition. You used this one again just a couple of paragraphs back.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I thought we should wait until tomorrow.&quot; I told her//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cook– eat ginger– well, we can eat!//</span><br />Either put spaces on both sides of your dashes or go without spaces altogether.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to join Pinkie and I//</span><br />People often use this phrasing wrong while trying to avoid the more common ways of using it wrong. It&#039;s &quot;Pinkie and me.&quot; It&#039;s part of a compound firect object of the verb &quot;join.&quot; Try removing Pinkie from it, and then see what works. &quot;To join I.&quot; That&#039;s obviously wrong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie trotted out from behind the tree, holding a top hat filled with papers.//</span><br />Given the sheer number of participial phrases you use, I&#039;d also caution you that they&#039;re often misplaced modifiers. By theor proximity in the sentence, the &quot;holding…&quot; phrase describes the tree. While I can apply a bit of logic to sort it out, you will eventually write something that&#039;s ambiguous or outright misleading, if you&#039;re not careful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I smiled, tucking the paper away.//</span><br />And to add to my &quot;given the sheer number of participial phrases you use&quot; from the last comment… Over the past 8 sentences, you use the &quot;&lt;main clause&gt;, &lt;participial phrase&gt;&quot; structure 5 times. And there are more over the next few paragraphs, I see. You&#039;re getting into a rut of sentence structure that you didn&#039;t have early in the story. Back then, you had more simple and compound sentences, which are so common that they pass unnoticed, as long as you break them up once in a while with something different. But these more elaborate structures stand out more when they get repeated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she thought about what to get for her pony//</span><br />Watch your perspective. How would Twilight know this was what Pinkie was thinking?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Well, Pinkie probably has some sugary concoction that&#039;ll wake you up,&quot; I gave her a gentle nudge with my elbow.//</span><br />Punctuation. Your attribution has no speaking action, so it needs to be a separate sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her accent grew thicker when she was tired out.//</span><br />This is your fifth use of &quot;tired&quot; in the last ten paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack seemed to be perking up when there was a knock at the door.//</span><br />Watch what this implies. Without a comma, as you have it, it implies the knock was what perked her up. With a comma, it would merely give a chronology, which is what you want.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Uh-I&#039;m comin&#039;//</span><br />Use a dash here, not a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Looks like a gotta be headin&#039; off.//</span><br />Seems like you were trying for the common &quot;Ah&quot; imitative spelling. Note that it needs to be capitalized, since it&#039;s a stand-in for &quot;I.&quot; However let me dissuade you from writing her accent to that degree. Imitative spellings are rarely necessary, and too many just slow the reader down. Readers already know how she sounds and will fill that in for you. It&#039;s more about phrasing and word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bravely//</span><br />What about it leads Twilight to conclude it&#039;s brave? It adds more power if you make me conclude that instead of feeding it to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, what gives AJ?//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack looked instantly relieved. &quot;Thanks.&quot; She stepped outside, looking very at home between her siblings.//</span><br />Show me!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We had a long discussion, leading us nowhere but in endless circles, but still bringing up plenty of unpleasant possibilities. We finally disbanded a few hours later, feeling sick with worry about the Apple Family. I knew for sure that five sleepless nights were to come.//</span><br />Yow. You&#039;re sure glossing over a ton of the emotional context of the story here. You don&#039;t have to take me through the evening minute by minute, but seeing everyone&#039;s concern is a whole lot different than having it summed up for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I laid awake for a long time//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So they just don&#039;t celebrate.//</span><br />As long as most of these ponies have known her, none of them ever knew this? I hope you end up explaining…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-this//</span><br />Think about what sound would actually be repeated. &quot;Th-this,&quot; surely.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Did this every year,&quot; Pinkie explained, &quot;And I always fall asleep…//</span><br />Don&#039;t capitalize the second part of the quote when you continue it like this, as long as the two parts of the quote join into a single, valid sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twi//</span><br />Apple Bloom&#039;s never called her that in canon, and I think she&#039;d show more respect to an adult than that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ornament of needle or branch out of place//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My backyard//</span><br />Isn&#039;t her backyard a street?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gingerbreadmare//</span><br />Gingerbread man isn&#039;t a single word, so why would this be?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;feeding her rabbit, Angel//</span><br />Again, this is something you can assume the reader will know. Just say she&#039;s feeding Angel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rather pompously//</span><br />Why would she make such a judgment about herself? If it&#039;s for an effect, she&#039;d say what that effect was. It&#039;s not the time for self-deprecation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Fluttershy and I agreed that you aren&#039;t having enough fun,&quot; I told them both, &quot;So we&#039;re going to have a snowball fight.&quot;//</span><br />Quote capitalization again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a stack of freezing snowballs//</span><br />Kind of a redundant description, unless you literally mean they&#039;re still in the process of freezing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Despite the seriousness with which I&#039;m telling this//</span><br />This is a mistake. First, it kicks me out of the moment, since it suggests that the whole thing is actually an after-the-fact retelling of a past event. Second, it addresses me directly. You haven&#039;t done so as yet, so it&#039;s out of place, and it also opens the can of worms of needing to define my role. Why is she telling me this story? Why do I want to listen? Best to avoid that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We aren&#039;t sure who won//</span><br />Another inexplicable shift to present tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;9//</span><br />Write it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once empty//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I rolled my eyes, laying them on top of the sled.//</span><br />Vague antecedent. It sounds like she&#039;s laying her eyes on the sled.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn&#039;t even have to come from me//</span><br />You meant &quot;it,&quot; right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hooked the clasp on the antlers under my chin, snatching the sled and the scroll as I flew out the door.//</span><br />Participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses both imply concurrent actions, so all of these happen at the same time. That doesn&#039;t quite work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Over hills and down a small dirt path laid Sweet Apple Acres//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to be sure she was awake//</span><br />Missing period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I stopped minute//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; I was starting to hear the wheezing breaths of Applebloom as she rushing through the snow to catch up//</span><br />Odd choice of verb tense for the first part, and it&#039;s outright wrong for the second.<br /><br />Well, here&#039;s where I usually rehash the major problems and bring up overall ones. So, watch the commas, space your dashes right, watch the repetitive sentence structures and ponderous use of participles, and show, don&#039;t tell. And you only use &quot;said&quot; 7 times as a dialogue tag out of approximately 250 quotes. I&#039;ve explained the rationale for why that&#039;s problematic in the portion of the thread I referred you to, but I wanted to add the numbers here, so you could see how extreme it was.<br /><br />The only other thing I want to bring up is—well, aside from Twilight&#039;s odd mood through the first couple of scenes, which I mentioned earlier—that the conflict is pretty weak here. There&#039;s certainly a conflict from Applejack&#039;s point of view, but we don&#039;t see that. We get Twilight&#039;s point of view, and she certainly does debate how to deal with the situation, but then the solution just drops in her lap. It&#039;s a classic deus ex machina. She wasn&#039;t particularly beating her head over what to do about it either, so it wasn&#039;t like a huge conundrum that was eating her up. It&#039;s a bit understated to have much impact. Now, getting back to Applejack. You emphasize how much pride she has, and I tend to agree with you there. But she&#039;s immediately willing to swallow that pride? I doubt it. But I have no indication otherwise. You gloss over Applejack&#039;s reaction in the short final scene and basically summarize it such that she admitted everything openly and freely. How she talked to them is at least as important as what she said, and you&#039;re missing out on a lot of this story&#039;s punch by declining to show me this. There&#039;s your conflict. It can be shown externally through Twilight&#039;s perception—that is, you don&#039;t need to transfer into Applejack&#039;s point of view to get at it. That&#039;s certainly not the only way to bring some real conflict into the story, but I think it&#039;s the one that most clearly presents itself.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sun, Jan 26th, 2014 00:20</span></div><br/>

Seether00Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 105

>>129558
You make a valid point. I am adding some precursor cues. Also, something to make that part less abrupt.

Her own damage, she can cope with. Her friends however, and while doing something she was responsible for, several times… guilt!

That will be very important for her arc in this story as it's her core motivator. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129558" onclick="return highlight('129558', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129558">&gt;&gt;129558</a><br />You make a valid point. I am adding some precursor cues. Also, something to make that part less abrupt.<br /><br />Her own damage, she can cope with. Her friends however, and while doing something she was responsible for, several times… guilt!<br /><br />That will be very important for her arc in this story as it&#039;s her core motivator.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 106

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>less fortunate class mates//
Less-fortunate classmates. I'll also say that someone who would be self-aware about her behavior enough to admit she loved rubbing their faces in it probably wouldn't think of them as circumspectly as "less-fortunate."

Story:
>her Dad//
The difference between whether you do or don't capitalize "dad" depends on whether you're referring to him specifically or as one of a group. So if you'd just said "Dad," it would be capitalized, but in "her dad," it wouldn't.

>All she had to do was pick up her dress and she’d be good to go until then.//

Needs a comma to separate the clauses. See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>wanting to touch on another subject//

This is already the third time you've told me what she did or didn't want. We can already tell what she wants, at least in this case, by what she says. More often that not, you won't want to state her wants directly like this.

>“It’s guaranteed to be amazing.”//

Despite what she says, I'm not seeing any evidence that she's anything but stoic about it. Let me see a reaction or an image that pops into her head.

> the Carousel Boutique//

You don' use "the" with a specific place name, unless it's actually part of the name. For instance, you go to the store, but you go to Wal-Mart.

>where Diamond Tiara was supposed to pick up her dress//

This is already evident. You can assume your readers will know who and what Rarity and Carousel Boutique are.

>They approached their destination eventually, going through the front door into the prim and tidy lobby that was the Carousel Boutique.//

Note that participles imply concurrent action, so she goes through the door at the same time she approaches the building? Same deal with "the" Carousel Boutique, and you're saying that the entire store is the lobby.

>Rarity was there//

Get straight to her action. This is incredibly boring.

>looked down at Diamond Tiara, the pink filly returning an eager look//

Repetitive use of "look," and the "eager look" is pretty telly anyway. Give me a couple of details so that I conclude that about her. It makes the writing much more engaging. You might want to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>“That’s good to hear.” Rarity levitated a nearby present//

You don't attribute this speech, and with Rarity's action immediately following it, she will be presumed as the speaker.

>and carefully set on Diamond’s back//

Missing word.

>and she was surprised that the young filly could lift it on her own//

Also see the section on head hopping. This isn't adding anything to the story, so there's no need to switch from Diamond's perspective to Rarity's particularly since you could have shown Rarity's surprise as Diamond perceives it. If you jerk around the perspective like this, it's jarring to the reader and prevents him from getting settled into your characters.

>Applebloom//

You spelled it right before. Why not now?

>but not before being told where Sweetie Belle might have been//

You were just there. Why didn't you include this as part of the conversation?

>Besides, it was a chance to embarrass another blank flank. Why in Equestria would they pass up that perfect chance?//

Now, this is a pretty realistic reaction. Why didn't she have it immediately when Rarity suggested it?

>They passed a large tree, where they saw the resident weather pony, Rainbow Dash reading off a list for some reason or another.//

What relevance does this have to anything? It's completely empty filler, and the story would be no worse for removing it.

>You’re new outfit//

Your/you're confusion.

>“Can you imagine how embarrassing it must be to be… not special.”//

Isn't this a question?

>They must have been working on something very important to be out here.//

That's quite a leap of logic, and one that's awfully convenient to the plot. Anyone in the park must be there for a very important reason?

>And hopefully all of that hard work would pay off.//

And in this paragraph, you've gone into Sweetie Belle's perspective. It's ping-ponging all over the place.

>caused her to lose focus, causing//

More word repetition.

>She had gotten better this time around, admittedly; whereas a few months ago after even attempting this, she would feel light-headed and almost lose consciousness.//

It's bad practice to use a conjunction after a semicolon. They have pretty redundant purposes.

>She was trying to seem wasn’t fazed, even striking a pose//

A couple of missing words there. And what kind of pose? This is completely vague.

>Even though it was unexpected, they still snickered from the sight of it.//

Besides the awkward phrasing, this doesn't even have an understandable meaning. They don't snicker at unexpected things?

>The pink filly stopped laughing to see the predicament that she was in. She tried to shake her legs free, but her movements were becoming more and more restricted by the magic placed upon her, practically holding her in place.//

This is awfully clinical and formal language for what would certainly be an emotional experience. Since you've been using a more subjective narrator, why have him back off here, where the facts are only half the story?

>The smoke eventually disappeared//

How did it stay there through the "huge gust of wind"?

>just mere//

These are redundant.

>She was still a bit disoriented from what happened, but she was able to determine who and what was in front of her.//

Each of the past four paragraphs has been in a different perspective.

>“If it gets her,” - Diamond pointed at the pony now standing beside her, “-off my back//

You're almost right, but your dash placement is inconsistent, and please don't use hyphens. Here's how it works:
>“If it gets her—” Diamond pointed at the pony now standing beside her “—off my back,
if the speech stops for the action, and:
>“If it gets her”—Diamond pointed at the pony now standing beside her—“off my back,
if it doesn't.

>since they left the park//

This is a completed action in a past-tense narration, so use past perfect. "They had" or "they'd."

>little interruptions//

Singular. As a plural, it would mean there were numerous smal interruptions.

>With that//

Phrases like this, which refer to the writing itself, aren't a good idea, except maybe for a first-person narrator.

>Silver Spoon looked back at pony.//

Missing word.

>a deadpanned look//

Deadpan.

>Twilight approached the filly kneeled down, meeting her at eye-level.//

Some off syntax there.

>Twilight stood and levitated a scroll from her saddle bag//

Wow. Awfully convenient that Twilight had that particular information with her, and that she knew exactly what this was, and that she could tell so quickly, and that she'd had enough of an interest in it lately to have read up on it.

>he looked over at the double//

You'd been capitalizing "Double." Be consistent.

>Twilight tiled her head./

Typo.

>She departed from the fillies//

And after seeing this magical oddity that's apparently interested her recently, she just walks off. And ad the first adult to figure out what's happened, she's not going to see to it that someone's going to take care of her.

>by then it was too late. //

Capitalization.

>They had already gotten too far out of ear-shot,//

Earshot, and your punctuating this like it's a dialogue attribution, but you have no speaking verb.

>asked where Sugarcube was//

Missing a word.

>cute- ceañera//

Extraneous space. For that matter, I don't think the canon spelling uses a hyphen.

>F-Forget it//

Unless it's a proper noun, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>nor has she ever actually heard//

Why the switch to present tense?

>Scootaloo//

Given that your narrator's been in Blue's perspective for most of this scene, he shouldn't know who this is any more than Blue does.

>but not before grabbing a chocolate chip from off one of the tables//

A single chocolate chip? I have to think you meant a cookie or muffin or some such.

>on occasions//

That phrase is normally rendered in the singular.

>I really don’t think mom and dad//

See, in this case, you do need to capitalize "Mom" and "Dad."

>contingency//

Insofar as the narrator is Diamond here, this doesn't strike me as a word she would use, much less know.

>It was a lesson that, regrettable, she had fallen asleep in.//

Regrettably.

>huge!//

Normally, you'll italicize a ! or ? that's on an italicized word. You do so a bit later.

>It’s obvious her special talent isn’t drawing.//

You're in present tense again. Maybe you meant this to be a thought?

>“What’s ‘Mass Effect’?”//

Pretty much the only thing a pop culture reference will do is date your story.

>Just five more five minutes//

Extraneous word.

>There was no response, instead they heard ruckus coming from the other side.//

Comma splice.

The biggest problems are really in the forefront here. A lot of the emotional content was presented in a telly manner, and the narrator's perspective wavered all over the place. You really have to keep mind of who holds the point of view at any given moment and make sure you stick to that.

Aside from that, I'm three chapters in, and I still have no idea what the story's about. Conflict is what drives a story, be it something external that needs to be resolved between characters or internal that results in character growth. In any case, there has to be something that one or more of the characters want. We've met Blue, but she's just along for the ride. She's not working toward anything, and even Twilight's not concerned about how she came to be or what they're going to do with her. I appreciate that you've made Diamond a sympathetic character in that she was largely ignored at her own cuteceanera, but there's also no goal she's trying to achieve. Sweetie Belle actually is trying to attain something, but once her efforts result in Blue, she's left out. I'm sure you intend either Royal Blue or Diamond Tiara to be your protagonist, so have some long-term conflict arise for one or both of them. This far into the story, I really should know what's at stake and who has an interest in it. In fact, that needs to be established as soon as possible. There are some nice character interactions, but the plot doesn't feel like it has a direction so far.

That's actually something I'd recommend an author do on any story: Map out your main characters, define what they want, what they're willing to do to get it, and what bad thing will happen if they don't.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;less fortunate class mates//</span><br />Less-fortunate classmates. I&#039;ll also say that someone who would be self-aware about her behavior enough to admit she loved rubbing their faces in it probably wouldn&#039;t think of them as circumspectly as &quot;less-fortunate.&quot;<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her Dad//</span><br />The difference between whether you do or don&#039;t capitalize &quot;dad&quot; depends on whether you&#039;re referring to him specifically or as one of a group. So if you&#039;d just said &quot;Dad,&quot; it would be capitalized, but in &quot;her dad,&quot; it wouldn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All she had to do was pick up her dress and she’d be good to go until then.//</span><br />Needs a comma to separate the clauses. See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wanting to touch on another subject//</span><br />This is already the third time you&#039;ve told me what she did or didn&#039;t want. We can already tell what she wants, at least in this case, by what she says. More often that not, you won&#039;t want to state her wants directly like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“It’s guaranteed to be amazing.”//</span><br />Despite what she says, I&#039;m not seeing any evidence that she&#039;s anything but stoic about it. Let me see a reaction or an image that pops into her head.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; the Carousel Boutique//</span><br />You don&#039; use &quot;the&quot; with a specific place name, unless it&#039;s actually part of the name. For instance, you go to the store, but you go to Wal-Mart.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;where Diamond Tiara was supposed to pick up her dress//</span><br />This is already evident. You can assume your readers will know who and what Rarity and Carousel Boutique are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They approached their destination eventually, going through the front door into the prim and tidy lobby that was the Carousel Boutique.//</span><br />Note that participles imply concurrent action, so she goes through the door at the same time she approaches the building? Same deal with &quot;the&quot; Carousel Boutique, and you&#039;re saying that the entire store is the lobby.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity was there//</span><br />Get straight to her action. This is incredibly boring.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked down at Diamond Tiara, the pink filly returning an eager look//</span><br />Repetitive use of &quot;look,&quot; and the &quot;eager look&quot; is pretty telly anyway. Give me a couple of details so that I conclude that about her. It makes the writing much more engaging. You might want to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That’s good to hear.” Rarity levitated a nearby present//</span><br />You don&#039;t attribute this speech, and with Rarity&#039;s action immediately following it, she will be presumed as the speaker.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and carefully set on Diamond’s back//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she was surprised that the young filly could lift it on her own//</span><br />Also see the section on head hopping. This isn&#039;t adding anything to the story, so there&#039;s no need to switch from Diamond&#039;s perspective to Rarity&#039;s particularly since you could have shown Rarity&#039;s surprise as Diamond perceives it. If you jerk around the perspective like this, it&#039;s jarring to the reader and prevents him from getting settled into your characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />You spelled it right before. Why not now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but not before being told where Sweetie Belle might have been//</span><br />You were just there. Why didn&#039;t you include this as part of the conversation?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Besides, it was a chance to embarrass another blank flank. Why in Equestria would they pass up that perfect chance?//</span><br />Now, this is a pretty realistic reaction. Why didn&#039;t she have it immediately when Rarity suggested it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They passed a large tree, where they saw the resident weather pony, Rainbow Dash reading off a list for some reason or another.//</span><br />What relevance does this have to anything? It&#039;s completely empty filler, and the story would be no worse for removing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You’re new outfit//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Can you imagine how embarrassing it must be to be… not special.”//</span><br />Isn&#039;t this a question?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They must have been working on something very important to be out here.//</span><br />That&#039;s quite a leap of logic, and one that&#039;s awfully convenient to the plot. Anyone in the park must be there for a very important reason?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And hopefully all of that hard work would pay off.//</span><br />And in this paragraph, you&#039;ve gone into Sweetie Belle&#039;s perspective. It&#039;s ping-ponging all over the place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;caused her to lose focus, causing//</span><br />More word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had gotten better this time around, admittedly; whereas a few months ago after even attempting this, she would feel light-headed and almost lose consciousness.//</span><br />It&#039;s bad practice to use a conjunction after a semicolon. They have pretty redundant purposes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was trying to seem wasn’t fazed, even striking a pose//</span><br />A couple of missing words there. And what kind of pose? This is completely vague.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even though it was unexpected, they still snickered from the sight of it.//</span><br />Besides the awkward phrasing, this doesn&#039;t even have an understandable meaning. They don&#039;t snicker at unexpected things?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pink filly stopped laughing to see the predicament that she was in. She tried to shake her legs free, but her movements were becoming more and more restricted by the magic placed upon her, practically holding her in place.//</span><br />This is awfully clinical and formal language for what would certainly be an emotional experience. Since you&#039;ve been using a more subjective narrator, why have him back off here, where the facts are only half the story?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The smoke eventually disappeared//</span><br />How did it stay there through the &quot;huge gust of wind&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just mere//</span><br />These are redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was still a bit disoriented from what happened, but she was able to determine who and what was in front of her.//</span><br />Each of the past four paragraphs has been in a different perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“If it gets her,” - Diamond pointed at the pony now standing beside her, “-off my back//</span><br />You&#039;re almost right, but your dash placement is inconsistent, and please don&#039;t use hyphens. Here&#039;s how it works:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“If it gets her—” Diamond pointed at the pony now standing beside her “—off my back,</span><br />if the speech stops for the action, and:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“If it gets her”—Diamond pointed at the pony now standing beside her—“off my back,</span><br />if it doesn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;since they left the park//</span><br />This is a completed action in a past-tense narration, so use past perfect. &quot;They had&quot; or &quot;they&#039;d.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little interruptions//</span><br />Singular. As a plural, it would mean there were numerous smal interruptions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that//</span><br />Phrases like this, which refer to the writing itself, aren&#039;t a good idea, except maybe for a first-person narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silver Spoon looked back at pony.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a deadpanned look//</span><br />Deadpan.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight approached the filly kneeled down, meeting her at eye-level.//</span><br />Some off syntax there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight stood and levitated a scroll from her saddle bag//</span><br />Wow. Awfully convenient that Twilight had that particular information with her, and that she knew exactly what this was, and that she could tell so quickly, and that she&#039;d had enough of an interest in it lately to have read up on it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he looked over at the double//</span><br />You&#039;d been capitalizing &quot;Double.&quot; Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight tiled her head./</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She departed from the fillies//</span><br />And after seeing this magical oddity that&#039;s apparently interested her recently, she just walks off. And ad the first adult to figure out what&#039;s happened, she&#039;s not going to see to it that someone&#039;s going to take care of her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;by then it was too late. //</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They had already gotten too far out of ear-shot,//</span><br />Earshot, and your punctuating this like it&#039;s a dialogue attribution, but you have no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;asked where Sugarcube was//</span><br />Missing a word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cute- ceañera//</span><br />Extraneous space. For that matter, I don&#039;t think the canon spelling uses a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;F-Forget it//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a proper noun, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nor has she ever actually heard//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo//</span><br />Given that your narrator&#039;s been in Blue&#039;s perspective for most of this scene, he shouldn&#039;t know who this is any more than Blue does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but not before grabbing a chocolate chip from off one of the tables//</span><br />A single chocolate chip? I have to think you meant a cookie or muffin or some such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on occasions//</span><br />That phrase is normally rendered in the singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I really don’t think mom and dad//</span><br />See, in this case, you do need to capitalize &quot;Mom&quot; and &quot;Dad.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;contingency//</span><br />Insofar as the narrator is Diamond here, this doesn&#039;t strike me as a word she would use, much less know.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a lesson that, regrettable, she had fallen asleep in.//</span><br />Regrettably.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>huge</i>!//</span><br />Normally, you&#039;ll italicize a ! or ? that&#039;s on an italicized word. You do so a bit later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s obvious her special talent isn’t drawing.//</span><br />You&#039;re in present tense again. Maybe you meant this to be a thought?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“What’s ‘Mass Effect’?”//</span><br />Pretty much the only thing a pop culture reference will do is date your story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just five more five minutes//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was no response, instead they heard ruckus coming from the other side.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br />The biggest problems are really in the forefront here. A lot of the emotional content was presented in a telly manner, and the narrator&#039;s perspective wavered all over the place. You really have to keep mind of who holds the point of view at any given moment and make sure you stick to that.<br /><br />Aside from that, I&#039;m three chapters in, and I still have no idea what the story&#039;s about. Conflict is what drives a story, be it something external that needs to be resolved between characters or internal that results in character growth. In any case, there has to be something that one or more of the characters want. We&#039;ve met Blue, but she&#039;s just along for the ride. She&#039;s not working toward anything, and even Twilight&#039;s not concerned about how she came to be or what they&#039;re going to do with her. I appreciate that you&#039;ve made Diamond a sympathetic character in that she was largely ignored at her own cuteceanera, but there&#039;s also no goal she&#039;s trying to achieve. Sweetie Belle actually is trying to attain something, but once her efforts result in Blue, she&#039;s left out. I&#039;m sure you intend either Royal Blue or Diamond Tiara to be your protagonist, so have some long-term conflict arise for one or both of them. This far into the story, I really should know what&#039;s at stake and who has an interest in it. In fact, that needs to be established as soon as possible. There are some nice character interactions, but the plot doesn&#039;t feel like it has a direction so far.<br /><br />That&#039;s actually something I&#039;d recommend an author do on any story: Map out your main characters, define what they want, what they&#039;re willing to do to get it, and what bad thing will happen if they don&#039;t.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 107

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
This format just looks off. You've only got three short sentences, and each is in its own paragraph, but you're inconsistent with the line breaks. It comes across as very choppy.

Story:
>Luna's full moon//
This and "Celestia's sun" are incredibly cliched phrases to use. It just makes you look very unoriginal.

>brilliant glow//

>soft whiteness//
Well, which is it?

>coffee fuelled//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>The stars were her companions, she knew nearly every last one by name.//

Comma splice.

>It was the one place where she could truly feel at peace. It was a place she could go, where the worries of everyday life would slip away.//

A lot of this description was repetitive, and given that you're only two words above our required minimum, I can take a guess as to why. Empty filler is empty. If your story's good enough despite being below word count, we can accept it anyway. I will say that a lot of this description is pretty cold. It's very factual in its conveyance of emotion. Don't just tell me she feels content. Show me through how she acts, looks, speaks, and thinks. You might want to read over the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Especially this early in the story, you need to make an immediate emotional connection between the reader and your character, and that means letting me see this through her experience, not just having the narrator inform me of everything.

>bringing pleasant memories to her head//

By itself, this means nothing. What sort of memories? Describe a couple of them for me.

>As she stared amazed at the surreal beauty within the fountain//

Then why did she just describe it as dull?

>Pinkie could plainly see how depressed she was//

Let me see it, too. That's how you build sympathy for a character. If you get me to conclude she's sad, it's a lot more real than if you merely tell me.

>Sweetie only shrugged in response, her eyes never leaving the ground. Pinkie smiled warmly//

Here's an example of where you did it right. You don't say outright how they're feeling, but I can tell through your descriptions and actions.

>then sat down close—but not too close—next to her//

If we take out the aside, that would read: "then sat down close next to her." You have an extraneous word.

>After a few minutes passed while she gazed at the dancing night sky//

That's a pretty clunky phrasing. You've got competing chronology of "after" and "while" mashed together.

>letting her gaze drift back to the ground//

You never had her look up, so her gaze was already on the ground.

>Sympathy and worry flowed through her head//

Very telly.

>Pinkie wondered//

Using things like wondered, wanted, or thought as narrative actions are pretty weak. Be more direct. If she's wondering something, just have her wonder it.

>Sweetie's voice trailed off.//

I already got that from the punctuation. You don't need to communicate it again.

>She took a deep breath//

You have an awful lot of deep breaths and sighing. Mix up your character actions more.

>Her quivering lips and watery eyes really caught Pinkie's attention however.//

Why? They're not exactly extraordinary things. What about them was so noteworthy that you made a special point of remarking about them?

>who didn't move a muscle as she listened intently//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>"Well…" she paused in thought, looking back to Sweetie, "…no.//

Your attribution has no speaking verb. I looks like you're actually trying to make this an aside though, so this is how you do it:
"Well—" she paused in thought, looking back to Sweetie "—no.
BUT
The break already implies a pause, so you don't need to narrate one.

>the cold ground//

You already used that phrasing. Watch the repetition.

>everyday//

In this sense, you need it to be two words.

>Sweetie Belle didn't move as she absorbed and pondered what she had just heard. Pinkie took advantage of the quiet moment to look back up in the sky and let the glow of the moon calm her mind. She silently thanked her friends for the support they were giving.//

You're keeping a shallow enough perspective throughout the story that I haven't seen any blatant problems, but this is getting close. Note how the first sentence speaks to things only Sweetie Belle would know internally, since you're not presenting it as Pinkie's interpretation of how she's acting. But in the next two sentences, you definitely say things that are internal to Pinkie. An omniscient narrator can certainly wander into different perspectives, but you have to do it smoothly. And you should absolutely not switch perspectives within a paragraph. There's a section on head hopping at the top of this thread that will give the rationale behind this.

>Whatever she said would possibly have an effect on the rest of the filly's life. Whatever she said needed to be perfect.//

That's overdramatizing things a bit, isn't it? She's momentarily upset about Opalescence, but she'll come to terms with it. It's not like she's suddenly going to get suicidal because she's realized her own mortality. For that matter why hasn't Rarity talked to Sweetie Belle? And why hasn't Pinkie asked how Rarity's taking it?

>One that if answered incorrectly could possiblely lead to a long, meaningless life for the little filly.//

Yes, you're definitely going over the top with this. And you have a typo there.

>It's only in most ponies' last moments do they recognize these gifts all around them and the effect they have on our lives.//

Syntax is a little jumbled here. Either lose the "it's" or replace "do" with "that."

>cold ground//

Again with the cold ground, huh?

>a single warm tear roll down her cheek//

It's hard to top "Luna's full moon," but this is an even more cliched thing.

It's a little pat that Sweetie Belle seems to feel completely better at the end. Reassured, maybe, but she'd still need to think things over. I get why you chose Pinkie for this role, but… she doesn't act that much like Pinkie. Subdued Pinkie is fine. It can work. But you need to get me into that mindset of why she's subdued. Part of this goes back to the beginning, where you tell me Pinkie finds her night walks peaceful, but you didn't show me. Show me what makes it peaceful for her and what thoughts and images are running through her head, and that will go a long way toward making this tamer Pinkie feel natural.

So, watch the telling, ease me into Pinkie's mood, what else…?

You had a few issues with word and phrase repetition. One which you probably wouldn't notice is this: was, 29; were, 8; is, 14; be/been/being, 15. That's 66 "to be" verbs, at least the easiest forms to spot. That's not an awful amount for this word count, but it's getting up there. These are very boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about things that happen, not things that are. You should be choosing more active verbs.

Finally, the conflict. I love the angle you took on this, with Opal dying. But I'll reiterate my point about everyone overlooking Rarity's feelings about it. You at least recognize that the story needs to have some conflict, but Pinkie has a really overblown reaction to Sweetie Belle. If she doesn't say the perfect thing in response, Sweetie Belle will forever go through life as a withered shell of her former self and have a dread of death hanging over her? That's too much. And by overplaying it so much, you make Sweetie Belle's miraculous turnaraound feel inauthentic. Understated and subtle is much more powerful than in-your-face. Character growth can serve as a proxy for conflict, and you have Sweetie Belle set up for some. Just give some thought to her. Really put yourself in her situation and think about how you'd react to Pinkie. That realism will come through in the writing.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br />This format just looks off. You&#039;ve only got three short sentences, and each is in its own paragraph, but you&#039;re inconsistent with the line breaks. It comes across as very choppy.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna&#039;s full moon//</span><br />This and &quot;Celestia&#039;s sun&quot; are incredibly cliched phrases to use. It just makes you look very unoriginal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brilliant glow//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;soft whiteness//</span><br />Well, which is it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;coffee fuelled//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stars were her companions, she knew nearly every last one by name.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was the one place where she could truly feel at peace. It was a place she could go, where the worries of everyday life would slip away.//</span><br />A lot of this description was repetitive, and given that you&#039;re only two words above our required minimum, I can take a guess as to why. Empty filler is empty. If your story&#039;s good enough despite being below word count, we can accept it anyway. I will say that a lot of this description is pretty cold. It&#039;s very factual in its conveyance of emotion. Don&#039;t just tell me she feels content. Show me through how she acts, looks, speaks, and thinks. You might want to read over the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Especially this early in the story, you need to make an immediate emotional connection between the reader and your character, and that means letting me see this through her experience, not just having the narrator inform me of everything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bringing pleasant memories to her head//</span><br />By itself, this means nothing. What sort of memories? Describe a couple of them for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she stared amazed at the surreal beauty within the fountain//</span><br />Then why did she just describe it as dull?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie could plainly see how depressed she was//</span><br />Let me see it, too. That&#039;s how you build sympathy for a character. If you get me to conclude she&#039;s sad, it&#039;s a lot more real than if you merely tell me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie only shrugged in response, her eyes never leaving the ground. Pinkie smiled warmly//</span><br />Here&#039;s an example of where you did it right. You don&#039;t say outright how they&#039;re feeling, but I can tell through your descriptions and actions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then sat down close—but not too close—next to her//</span><br />If we take out the aside, that would read: &quot;then sat down close next to her.&quot; You have an extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After a few minutes passed while she gazed at the dancing night sky//</span><br />That&#039;s a pretty clunky phrasing. You&#039;ve got competing chronology of &quot;after&quot; and &quot;while&quot; mashed together.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;letting her gaze drift back to the ground//</span><br />You never had her look up, so her gaze was already on the ground.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sympathy and worry flowed through her head//</span><br />Very telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie wondered//</span><br />Using things like wondered, wanted, or thought as narrative actions are pretty weak. Be more direct. If she&#039;s wondering something, just have her wonder it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie&#039;s voice trailed off.//</span><br />I already got that from the punctuation. You don&#039;t need to communicate it again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She took a deep breath//</span><br />You have an awful lot of deep breaths and sighing. Mix up your character actions more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her quivering lips and watery eyes really caught Pinkie&#039;s attention however.//</span><br />Why? They&#039;re not exactly extraordinary things. What about them was so noteworthy that you made a special point of remarking about them?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who didn&#039;t move a muscle as she listened intently//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Well…&quot; she paused in thought, looking back to Sweetie, &quot;…no.//</span><br />Your attribution has no speaking verb. I looks like you&#039;re actually trying to make this an aside though, so this is how you do it:<br />&quot;Well—&quot; she paused in thought, looking back to Sweetie &quot;—no.<br />BUT<br />The break already implies a pause, so you don&#039;t need to narrate one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the cold ground//</span><br />You already used that phrasing. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;everyday//</span><br />In this sense, you need it to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle didn&#039;t move as she absorbed and pondered what she had just heard. Pinkie took advantage of the quiet moment to look back up in the sky and let the glow of the moon calm her mind. She silently thanked her friends for the support they were giving.//</span><br />You&#039;re keeping a shallow enough perspective throughout the story that I haven&#039;t seen any blatant problems, but this is getting close. Note how the first sentence speaks to things only Sweetie Belle would know internally, since you&#039;re not presenting it as Pinkie&#039;s interpretation of how she&#039;s acting. But in the next two sentences, you definitely say things that are internal to Pinkie. An omniscient narrator can certainly wander into different perspectives, but you have to do it smoothly. And you should absolutely not switch perspectives within a paragraph. There&#039;s a section on head hopping at the top of this thread that will give the rationale behind this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Whatever she said would possibly have an effect on the rest of the filly&#039;s life. Whatever she said needed to be perfect.//</span><br />That&#039;s overdramatizing things a bit, isn&#039;t it? She&#039;s momentarily upset about Opalescence, but she&#039;ll come to terms with it. It&#039;s not like she&#039;s suddenly going to get suicidal because she&#039;s realized her own mortality. For that matter why hasn&#039;t Rarity talked to Sweetie Belle? And why hasn&#039;t Pinkie asked how Rarity&#039;s taking it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One that if answered incorrectly could possiblely lead to a long, meaningless life for the little filly.//</span><br />Yes, you&#039;re definitely going over the top with this. And you have a typo there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s only in most ponies&#039; last moments do they recognize these gifts all around them and the effect they have on our lives.//</span><br />Syntax is a little jumbled here. Either lose the &quot;it&#039;s&quot; or replace &quot;do&quot; with &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cold ground//</span><br />Again with the cold ground, huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a single warm tear roll down her cheek//</span><br />It&#039;s hard to top &quot;Luna&#039;s full moon,&quot; but this is an even more cliched thing.<br /><br />It&#039;s a little pat that Sweetie Belle seems to feel completely better at the end. Reassured, maybe, but she&#039;d still need to think things over. I get why you chose Pinkie for this role, but… she doesn&#039;t act that much like Pinkie. Subdued Pinkie is fine. It can work. But you need to get me into that mindset of why she&#039;s subdued. Part of this goes back to the beginning, where you tell me Pinkie finds her night walks peaceful, but you didn&#039;t show me. Show me what makes it peaceful for her and what thoughts and images are running through her head, and that will go a long way toward making this tamer Pinkie feel natural.<br /><br />So, watch the telling, ease me into Pinkie&#039;s mood, what else…? <br /><br />You had a few issues with word and phrase repetition. One which you probably wouldn&#039;t notice is this: was, 29; were, 8; is, 14; be/been/being, 15. That&#039;s 66 &quot;to be&quot; verbs, at least the easiest forms to spot. That&#039;s not an awful amount for this word count, but it&#039;s getting up there. These are very boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about things that happen, not things that are. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />Finally, the conflict. I love the angle you took on this, with Opal dying. But I&#039;ll reiterate my point about everyone overlooking Rarity&#039;s feelings about it. You at least recognize that the story needs to have some conflict, but Pinkie has a really overblown reaction to Sweetie Belle. If she doesn&#039;t say the perfect thing in response, Sweetie Belle will forever go through life as a withered shell of her former self and have a dread of death hanging over her? That&#039;s too much. And by overplaying it so much, you make Sweetie Belle&#039;s miraculous turnaraound feel inauthentic. Understated and subtle is much more powerful than in-your-face. Character growth can serve as a proxy for conflict, and you have Sweetie Belle set up for some. Just give some thought to her. Really put yourself in her situation and think about how you&#039;d react to Pinkie. That realism will come through in the writing.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 108

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>peaceful in every connotation of the word//

There… really aren't many connotations to that word. And this paragraph is really skirting the edge of a weather report opening. Weather is boring, unless it's critical to the plot. Get to your action or your characters. You can work the weather in later.

>Moments just like this evoked in her a subtle sense of complacency.//

And so we reach the end of the first paragraph. Note how many times you use "to be" verbs in this paragraph. They have their uses, but they're boring verbs on the whole. And boring a reader is especially harmful where you're trying to provide a good hook. Also note that all but one of the ten sentences starts with anything other than the subject. You don't want your writing to get in a rut. Mix it up. Lastly, this sentence I've excerpted is very telly. There's an explanation of show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>trees - a small whistle//

Please use a dash, not a hyphen.

>“Hey there. That's an interesting song.” offered Twilight as she stopped beside the young one at the bubbling brook.//

Dialogue punctuation. There's also a section on this up top.

>Ecclesia//

I assumed you meant to spell it this way. You used "Ecllesia" in your submission form. Careful next time.

>the princess's//

You're using these types of references quite a bit. Check out the section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome, too.

>Do you need to see a doctor?//

Well, absent any signs of injury, why would she assume it was a physical problem?

>Ecclesia looked at her sadly.//

Another example of telly language. There's quite a bit of it in here.

>Twilight chuckled slightly in confusion.//

In addition to being telly, this is the first break we've had from eight solid paragraphs of speech. Another reference: now go read the section on talking heads.

>Thank you. I'm thankful//

Repetitive.

>laid on her back//

Lay/lie confusion.

>“Ssh. It's okay,” She looked at Twilight with her faded golden eyes.//

Dialogue punctuation. That can't be an attribution, since you have no speaking verb.

>It became apparent//

This is oddly disconnected from any of the characters. Your perspective has been with Twilight so far, but you leave it here without going anywhere in particular.

>Look Ecclesia//

Missing comma for direct address.

>several seconds//

There's a lot of this type of phrasing, too. It gets repetitive.

>a tear rolled down her cheek//

The old "single tear" cliche, huh?

>You're precious to me, I care about you and everypony in the world more deeply than you can understand.//

Comma splice.

>Ecclesia smiled with only a hint of sadness.//

I'm not getting much reaction from her, and what I do get is very telly. The result is that she comes across as very bland.

>A- are//

No spaces for a stutter.

>the word felt like a bomb inside her mouth that she dared not speak.//

That's not a dialogue tag. It needs to be a separate paragraph.

>sweeping craggy//

Coordinate adjectives need a comma to separate them.

Really, the biggest stylistic problem here is all the telly language. There were a few mechanical items as well, but nothing consistent enough that I could tell whether you just had a few oversights or got lucky.

On another note, I have to agree with one of your commenters. Whether you intended it to or not, this comes across as a very thinly veiled religious allegory. Personally, that doesn't bother me, but it's pretty close to the line of Equestria Daily policy. It doesn't come under consideration here, since there are enough other things I pointed out already, but if you're going to try resubmitting this again later, I'll have to call in another couple of pre-readers to decide where we stand on this. Even if you didn't have that in mind when writing it, I guarantee that a lot of readers will take it that way.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;peaceful in every connotation of the word//</span><br />There… really aren&#039;t many connotations to that word. And this paragraph is really skirting the edge of a weather report opening. Weather is boring, unless it&#039;s critical to the plot. Get to your action or your characters. You can work the weather in later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Moments just like this evoked in her a subtle sense of complacency.//</span><br />And so we reach the end of the first paragraph. Note how many times you use &quot;to be&quot; verbs in this paragraph. They have their uses, but they&#039;re boring verbs on the whole. And boring a reader is especially harmful where you&#039;re trying to provide a good hook. Also note that all but one of the ten sentences starts with anything other than the subject. You don&#039;t want your writing to get in a rut. Mix it up. Lastly, this sentence I&#039;ve excerpted is very telly. There&#039;s an explanation of show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trees - a small whistle//</span><br />Please use a dash, not a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Hey there. That&#039;s an interesting song.” offered Twilight as she stopped beside the young one at the bubbling brook.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation. There&#039;s also a section on this up top.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ecclesia//</span><br />I assumed you meant to spell it this way. You used &quot;Ecllesia&quot; in your submission form. Careful next time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the princess&#039;s//</span><br />You&#039;re using these types of references quite a bit. Check out the section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do you need to see a doctor?//</span><br />Well, absent any signs of injury, why would she assume it was a physical problem?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ecclesia looked at her sadly.//</span><br />Another example of telly language. There&#039;s quite a bit of it in here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight chuckled slightly in confusion.//</span><br />In addition to being telly, this is the first break we&#039;ve had from eight solid paragraphs of speech. Another reference: now go read the section on talking heads.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thank you. I&#039;m thankful//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laid on her back//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Ssh. It&#039;s okay,” She looked at Twilight with her faded golden eyes.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation. That can&#039;t be an attribution, since you have no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It became apparent//</span><br />This is oddly disconnected from any of the characters. Your perspective has been with Twilight so far, but you leave it here without going anywhere in particular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look Ecclesia//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;several seconds//</span><br />There&#039;s a lot of this type of phrasing, too. It gets repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a tear rolled down her cheek//</span><br />The old &quot;single tear&quot; cliche, huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You&#039;re precious to me, I care about you and everypony in the world more deeply than you can understand.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ecclesia smiled with only a hint of sadness.//</span><br />I&#039;m not getting much reaction from her, and what I do get is very telly. The result is that she comes across as very bland.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A- are//</span><br />No spaces for a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the word felt like a bomb inside her mouth that she dared not speak.//</span><br />That&#039;s not a dialogue tag. It needs to be a separate paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sweeping craggy//</span><br />Coordinate adjectives need a comma to separate them.<br /><br />Really, the biggest stylistic problem here is all the telly language. There were a few mechanical items as well, but nothing consistent enough that I could tell whether you just had a few oversights or got lucky.<br /><br />On another note, I have to agree with one of your commenters. Whether you intended it to or not, this comes across as a very thinly veiled religious allegory. Personally, that doesn&#039;t bother me, but it&#039;s pretty close to the line of Equestria Daily policy. It doesn&#039;t come under consideration here, since there are enough other things I pointed out already, but if you&#039;re going to try resubmitting this again later, I&#039;ll have to call in another couple of pre-readers to decide where we stand on this. Even if you didn&#039;t have that in mind when writing it, I guarantee that a lot of readers will take it that way.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 109

>>129604
Holy smokes! Thank you for the insight! Honestly, I wasn't aware of all the blunders in my writing until this point. I'm genuinely going to use this review to invigorate my writing. Sometimes all it takes is a little outside perspective, I suppose. My current project will greatly benefit now, since it has a lot of the same pitfalls as this fic did. So, thanks for the brutal wake up call. X)<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129604" onclick="return highlight('129604', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129604">&gt;&gt;129604</a><br />Holy smokes! Thank you for the insight! Honestly, I wasn&#039;t aware of all the blunders in my writing until this point. I&#039;m genuinely going to use this review to invigorate my writing. Sometimes all it takes is a little outside perspective, I suppose. My current project will greatly benefit now, since it has a lot of the same pitfalls as this fic did. So, thanks for the brutal wake up call. X)<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 110

>>129558

Alright, I think I am ready to resubmit. I spoke with both my editors about your:

>>But she has, when she discovered her own sterility. When people resort to drink over a shock, it's a shock of their own. She's surprised to find out her friends have been affected, but it'd be odd for her to bolt down some booze on their behalf. And she's shown no signs of feeling like she's the one responsible—she doesn't get apologetic about it—so she's not really bolstering herself against anything. If there were some outward signs that she was getting to be an emotional wreck over this, then I could see it.


This was their responses: "The problem with his assumption here is that he's assuming that telling the girls the bad news doesn't count as painful to Twilght.
And that's just her giving them the news, she has no reason not to expect at least one of them to curse her

Yeah, call it 'the weight of responsibility'
…plus, why else would booze be known as 'liquid courage' ?"

"… what?
No, I don't find this to be true at all.
People also drink to numb themselves for telling friends and loved ones incredibly bad news.

Her own damage, she can cope with. Her friends however, and while doing something she was responsible for, several times… guilt!"

I hope this one disagreement doesn't prejudice you. We three just differ from you on this one point.

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129558" onclick="return highlight('129558', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129558">&gt;&gt;129558</a><br /><br />Alright, I think I am ready to resubmit. I spoke with both my editors about your:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt;But she has, when she discovered her own sterility. When people resort to drink over a shock, it&#039;s a shock of their own. She&#039;s surprised to find out her friends have been affected, but it&#039;d be odd for her to bolt down some booze on their behalf. And she&#039;s shown no signs of feeling like she&#039;s the one responsible—she doesn&#039;t get apologetic about it—so she&#039;s not really bolstering herself against anything. If there were some outward signs that she was getting to be an emotional wreck over this, then I could see it.</span><br /><br />This was their responses: &quot;The problem with his assumption here is that he&#039;s assuming that telling the girls the bad news doesn&#039;t count as painful to Twilght.<br />And that&#039;s just her giving them the news, she has no reason not to expect at least one of them to curse her<br /><br />Yeah, call it &#039;the weight of responsibility&#039;<br />…plus, why else would booze be known as &#039;liquid courage&#039; ?&quot;<br /><br />&quot;… what?<br />No, I don&#039;t find this to be true at all.<br />People also drink to numb themselves for telling friends and loved ones incredibly bad news.<br /><br />Her own damage, she can cope with. Her friends however, and while doing something she was responsible for, several times… guilt!&quot;<br /><br />I hope this one disagreement doesn&#039;t prejudice you. We three just differ from you on this one point.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 111

>>129610
I'm going to post this here in case you'll notice it, since with the way the queue's been going lately, you may well not see it via email before the story gets posted.

>knock//

There's no need to italicize this. It's not being emphasized.

>one her best friends//

Missing an "of."

>I hope ya’ll are happy//

You spelled it correctly earlier (y'all).

>the gnarled messed left//

Typo.

>But, sis//

As a term of address, "Sis" would be capitalized.

>plum ridiculous//

plumb

>Applejack sniffled, and tilted her face back towards the ceiling.//

No comma.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>body scan//

You had this as a single word earlier. Be consistent.

>Twilight purposefully ignored Rainbow’s question and instead kept her eyes to the floor as she stalked into the kitchen. Cabinets being flung open followed by the sound of clinking glass could be heard.//

I'll point this out again. The "purposeful" puts this in Twilight's perspective, but the "could be heard" is in some perspective outside the kitchen. It's a really bad idea to change perspective inside a paragraph.

>scotch//

That's a proper noun.

>the other tribes//

Alicorns are a tribe?

>Rarity’s voice fell to a quiver.//

A quiver doesn't imply softness or a low tone, so this doesn't quite make sense.

>me!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>good ’un//

You mashed this together as one word earlier.

Okay, I'm going to explain the thing about the Scotch again, because I don't think your editors understood what my issue was, though it had seemed like you did in your initial response.

People don't bolt down whiskey purely on another's behalf; they do it on their own. If I hear the stranger next to me at a bar saying he got a divorce notice, I'm not going to need a drink to steady myself. But if the guy's my best friend, I might. In that case, it's because I care enough about him that his pain becomes mine. I'm still doing it on my behalf. So, yes, absolutely Twilight might have a drink in this situation. But I need the context. Let me come at this from another angle.

Say your brother-in-law whom you've never met comes for a visit. He's already there when you get home from work, so you're behind on the conversation. All you hear is him saying, "That's awful," and then he downs a glass of Scotch. He's stony-faced the entire time, and your wife doesn't react to his drinking. How do you interpret his action? Is he drinking because he's upset? He doesn't show it. Maybe it's normal for him to have a drink at this time of day. Your wife doesn't seem to be commiserating with him. So is she unaffected by whatever might be bothering him, or is she just unsurprised? It takes that context to establish what it all means.

So I'm glad you added the bits that showed Twilight was actually getting upset. That contextualizes the drinking for her. But I'm still not getting that from everyone else. They don't react to it at all, which makes it seem like this is completely normal behavior for her, and that steals some of its impact. A little goes a long way. All it'd take is a couple of them raising eyebrows at each other or some such, and voila, you've hammered home the full meaning. Seems like a minor point, but you dwelled on it for a few paragraphs, so it's worth giving it proper attention.

In any case, these are all minor things to address, and they can be handled while you wait for the story to go up.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129610" onclick="return highlight('129610', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129610">&gt;&gt;129610</a><br />I&#039;m going to post this here in case you&#039;ll notice it, since with the way the queue&#039;s been going lately, you may well not see it via email before the story gets posted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>knock</i>//</span><br />There&#039;s no need to italicize this. It&#039;s not being emphasized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one her best friends//</span><br />Missing an &quot;of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hope ya’ll are happy//</span><br />You spelled it correctly earlier (y&#039;all).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the gnarled messed left//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But, <i>sis</i>//</span><br />As a term of address, &quot;Sis&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;plum ridiculous//</span><br />plumb<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack sniffled, and tilted her face back towards the ceiling.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;body scan//</span><br />You had this as a single word earlier. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight purposefully ignored Rainbow’s question and instead kept her eyes to the floor as she stalked into the kitchen. Cabinets being flung open followed by the sound of clinking glass could be heard.//</span><br />I&#039;ll point this out again. The &quot;purposeful&quot; puts this in Twilight&#039;s perspective, but the &quot;could be heard&quot; is in some perspective outside the kitchen. It&#039;s a really bad idea to change perspective inside a paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scotch//</span><br />That&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the other tribes//</span><br />Alicorns are a tribe?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s voice fell to a quiver.//</span><br />A quiver doesn&#039;t imply softness or a low tone, so this doesn&#039;t quite make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>me</i>!//</span><br />Italicize the exclamation mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;good ’un//</span><br />You mashed this together as one word earlier.<br /><br />Okay, I&#039;m going to explain the thing about the Scotch again, because I don&#039;t think your editors understood what my issue was, though it had seemed like you did in your initial response.<br /><br />People don&#039;t bolt down whiskey purely on another&#039;s behalf; they do it on their own. If I hear the stranger next to me at a bar saying he got a divorce notice, I&#039;m not going to need a drink to steady myself. But if the guy&#039;s my best friend, I might. In that case, it&#039;s because I care enough about him that his pain becomes mine. I&#039;m still doing it on my behalf. So, yes, absolutely Twilight might have a drink in this situation. But I need the context. Let me come at this from another angle.<br /><br />Say your brother-in-law whom you&#039;ve never met comes for a visit. He&#039;s already there when you get home from work, so you&#039;re behind on the conversation. All you hear is him saying, &quot;That&#039;s awful,&quot; and then he downs a glass of Scotch. He&#039;s stony-faced the entire time, and your wife doesn&#039;t react to his drinking. How do you interpret his action? Is he drinking because he&#039;s upset? He doesn&#039;t show it. Maybe it&#039;s normal for him to have a drink at this time of day. Your wife doesn&#039;t seem to be commiserating with him. So is she unaffected by whatever might be bothering him, or is she just unsurprised? It takes that context to establish what it all means.<br /><br />So I&#039;m glad you added the bits that showed Twilight was actually getting upset. That contextualizes the drinking for her. But I&#039;m still not getting that from everyone else. They don&#039;t react to it at all, which makes it seem like this is completely normal behavior for her, and that steals some of its impact. A little goes a long way. All it&#039;d take is a couple of them raising eyebrows at each other or some such, and voila, you&#039;ve hammered home the full meaning. Seems like a minor point, but you dwelled on it for a few paragraphs, so it&#039;s worth giving it proper attention.<br /><br />In any case, these are all minor things to address, and they can be handled while you wait for the story to go up.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 112

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Their appetite for horror leads them into a horrifying position//
Watch the word repetition.

Story:
>Applejack was wearing a simple blue dress, while Rarity was decked out in an extravagant gown studded with jewels.//
You're using quite a few of those past participles. I don't see how they add anything here that simple past doesn't, which would also avoid boring "to be" verbs.

>hmmphed//

Onomatopoeia in narration isn't a good idea.

>Applejacks hoof//

Missing apostrophe.

>to seen//

Missing word.

>"And that goes for you too, Apple Bloom and Scootaloo." Applejack amended.//

Dialogue punctuation. There's a section on this at the top of the thread.

>She opened her mouth as if to say something, but it took a moment for her to say anything.//

That's pretty repetitive. Also look back over the previous few paragraphs. Outside of dialogue, it's been quite a while since you started a narrative sentence with anything but the subject.

>she finally committed//

That's a really odd choice of speaking verb. You're pushing the edge on these. When you do it a little, it adds flavor to the story. When you do it a lot, it makes the writing itself noticeable and pushes me out of the story.

>that white book//

Using "that" here doesn't really work. It'd suit a conversational style of a first-person or third-person limited narrator, or it'd work if you'd mentioned it before. But as it is, it just sounds odd.

>she told them//

You got this right in the first sentence. It's an event in the story's past, so use past perfect tense (had told).

>The air in the cellar was chilly, and carried the vague smell of dirt and fruit//

Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread, too.

>this one was made of across work of sticks//

Typo.

>two legged//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>She was relieved//

Here's the main problem I see with your story. I'm getting very little emotional context from these girls. You're telling me all the things they do, but not how they feel about any of it. I gather they're supposed to be scared, but they all seem pretty bland. And on the occasion like this where you do wedge in a bit of emotion, it's too blunt. The section up top about show versus tell will explain.

>At least she couldn't see it from here.//

Wouldn't she be even more unnerved to know it was behind her?

>When Sweetie Belle nosed her way into the center of the covering//

Set off most dependent clauses with commas.

>she noticed Scootaloo//

Given that your narrator isn't being consistently objective, you need to keep in mind who your perspective character is at all times. So far, when he's held a perspective, it's always been Scootaloo's, but here he's adopting Sweetie Belle's.

>Sweetie Belles//

Another missing apostrophe.

>knick-knacks//

Knickknacks. And this is a very odd word choice.

>a figure crude but it was enough for the magician//

Syntax is off.

>laid sprawled//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Kneeled beside his friend//

Verb tense.

>She turned back to her friends, exposing them fully to how badly she was shaking.//

Awkward phrasing.

Finally, toward the end of this scene, you're giving me more indirect cues of the girls' emotions. You really ought to be doing this through the story as well. It just comes across as a big block of text. Surely the girls are reacting or doing something as they listen to the story. Check ni every so often and let me see it.

Wait, what was that scene break for? There's no time skip, no shift of perspective, no change in setting… I don't see a reason for it.

>carefully//

With what's running through her mind right now, she's really going to be that careful with the book?

>Well it isn't here," Sweetie Belle said.//

Missing a line break here.

>Scaredycrow's//

Misused apostrophe.

>CRASH!//

Another one of those sound effects in narration. Just describe it.

>"Where's Granny Smith?"//

Another missing line break. And now that I think of it, why are they scared of the scaredycrow? It wasn't the evil thing in the story. Nothing was said about it being good or bad. If I'm supposed to be scared for them, you need to give me a reason to be.

>Shhhh.

Who says this? Don't just leave it unattributed like this.

>and the world became tilted and her breathing became rapid.//

This is very impersonal and external. This should be a result of Scootaloo's fright, but it's very vague in that regard. It's pretty bland.

>whatever was making it//

Any possible antecedent for "it" is located several paragraphs back. Not the best use of a pronoun.

>She had laid down on the floor//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>Apple Bloom would have would have followed too hadn't a glimpse of white on the floorboards caught her eye//

Syntax is off.

>lead it into a frantic dance//

led

>Her heart near stopped//

nearly

>Scootaloo was snoring in a heap besides her.//

Typo.

>I don’t think its waiting for us//

Its/it's confusion.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

As per canon, Sugarcube.

>Stuffs of cloud//

Huh?

>now you may stride for those dreams//

While this could make sense as written, I wonder if you meant "strive."

And that ending… I still have no idea how these girls feel about it. Is Sweetie Belle still scared of it, or has she changed her mind? I'm also unclear on the Scaredycrow's motives. I could see it as Applejack or one of her friends playing a prank, especially since they mentioned Twilight had been helping with it in the basement. But they sure took the joke far in that case. On the other hand, if this thing is real, how did Twilight not notice anything unusual about it? And it's potrayed as something that doesn't mean them harm, at least. So in either case, driving them to jump out a window, then not making sure they're okay? That's definitely taking it too far. It also doesn't quite ring true that if the girls are that scared, two of them could sleep, and none of them thought of running for help once they were outside.

One more note about repetition: You use a lot of "to be" verbs. They're boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You have 125 instances of "was" alone. If I include other common forms, I find 194. That's almost one every other sentence. You need to be choosing more active verbs.

It's not a bad story, but the lack of emotional investment and the leaps of logic in a few places are holding it back.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Their appetite for horror leads them into a horrifying position//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack was wearing a simple blue dress, while Rarity was decked out in an extravagant gown studded with jewels.//</span><br />You&#039;re using quite a few of those past participles. I don&#039;t see how they add anything here that simple past doesn&#039;t, which would also avoid boring &quot;to be&quot; verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hmmphed//</span><br />Onomatopoeia in narration isn&#039;t a good idea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejacks hoof//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to seen//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;And that goes for you too, Apple Bloom and Scootaloo.&quot; Applejack amended.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation. There&#039;s a section on this at the top of the thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She opened her mouth as if to say something, but it took a moment for her to say anything.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty repetitive. Also look back over the previous few paragraphs. Outside of dialogue, it&#039;s been quite a while since you started a narrative sentence with anything but the subject.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she finally committed//</span><br />That&#039;s a really odd choice of speaking verb. You&#039;re pushing the edge on these. When you do it a little, it adds flavor to the story. When you do it a lot, it makes the writing itself noticeable and pushes me out of the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that white book//</span><br />Using &quot;that&quot; here doesn&#039;t really work. It&#039;d suit a conversational style of a first-person or third-person limited narrator, or it&#039;d work if you&#039;d mentioned it before. But as it is, it just sounds odd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she told them//</span><br />You got this right in the first sentence. It&#039;s an event in the story&#039;s past, so use past perfect tense (had told).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The air in the cellar was chilly, and carried the vague smell of dirt and fruit//</span><br />Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this one was made of across work of sticks//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two legged//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was relieved//</span><br />Here&#039;s the main problem I see with your story. I&#039;m getting very little emotional context from these girls. You&#039;re telling me all the things they do, but not how they feel about any of it. I gather they&#039;re supposed to be scared, but they all seem pretty bland. And on the occasion like this where you do wedge in a bit of emotion, it&#039;s too blunt. The section up top about show versus tell will explain.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At least she couldn&#039;t see it from here.//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t she be even more unnerved to know it was behind her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When Sweetie Belle nosed her way into the center of the covering//</span><br />Set off most dependent clauses with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she noticed Scootaloo//</span><br />Given that your narrator isn&#039;t being consistently objective, you need to keep in mind who your perspective character is at all times. So far, when he&#039;s held a perspective, it&#039;s always been Scootaloo&#039;s, but here he&#039;s adopting Sweetie Belle&#039;s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belles//</span><br />Another missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knick-knacks//</span><br />Knickknacks. And this is a very odd word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a figure crude but it was enough for the magician//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laid sprawled//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Kneeled beside his friend//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned back to her friends, exposing them fully to how badly she was shaking.//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br />Finally, toward the end of this scene, you&#039;re giving me more indirect cues of the girls&#039; emotions. You really ought to be doing this through the story as well. It just comes across as a big block of text. Surely the girls are reacting or doing something as they listen to the story. Check ni every so often and let me see it.<br /><br />Wait, what was that scene break for? There&#039;s no time skip, no shift of perspective, no change in setting… I don&#039;t see a reason for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;carefully//</span><br />With what&#039;s running through her mind right now, she&#039;s really going to be that careful with the book?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well it isn&#039;t here,&quot; Sweetie Belle said.//</span><br />Missing a line break here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scaredycrow&#039;s//</span><br />Misused apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;CRASH!//</span><br />Another one of those sound effects in narration. Just describe it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Where&#039;s Granny Smith?&quot;//</span><br />Another missing line break. And now that I think of it, why are they scared of the scaredycrow? It wasn&#039;t the evil thing in the story. Nothing was said about it being good or bad. If I&#039;m supposed to be scared for them, you need to give me a reason to be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Shhhh</i>.</span><br />Who says this? Don&#039;t just leave it unattributed like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the world became tilted and her breathing became rapid.//</span><br />This is very impersonal and external. This should be a result of Scootaloo&#039;s fright, but it&#039;s very vague in that regard. It&#039;s pretty bland.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whatever was making it//</span><br />Any possible antecedent for &quot;it&quot; is located several paragraphs back. Not the best use of a pronoun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had laid down on the floor//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom would have would have followed too hadn&#039;t a glimpse of white on the floorboards caught her eye//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lead it into a frantic dance//</span><br />led<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her heart near stopped//</span><br />nearly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo was snoring in a heap besides her.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t think its waiting for us//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sugar Cube Corner//</span><br />As per canon, Sugarcube.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Stuffs of cloud//</span><br />Huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now you may stride for those dreams//</span><br />While this could make sense as written, I wonder if you meant &quot;strive.&quot;<br /><br />And that ending… I still have no idea how these girls feel about it. Is Sweetie Belle still scared of it, or has she changed her mind? I&#039;m also unclear on the Scaredycrow&#039;s motives. I could see it as Applejack or one of her friends playing a prank, especially since they mentioned Twilight had been helping with it in the basement. But they sure took the joke far in that case. On the other hand, if this thing is real, how did Twilight not notice anything unusual about it? And it&#039;s potrayed as something that doesn&#039;t mean them harm, at least. So in either case, driving them to jump out a window, then not making sure they&#039;re okay? That&#039;s definitely taking it too far. It also doesn&#039;t quite ring true that if the girls are that scared, two of them could sleep, and none of them thought of running for help once they were outside.<br /><br />One more note about repetition: You use a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You have 125 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone. If I include other common forms, I find 194. That&#039;s almost one every other sentence. You need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />It&#039;s not a bad story, but the lack of emotional investment and the leaps of logic in a few places are holding it back.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 113

>>129622
Thank you for taking the time to write all this out. A simple rejection letter would have worked, but you took the time to point out my word mix-ups and typos, and now my story is better for it. So again, thank you. Besides the easily fixable errors, I won't address your critique for this story, but I will keep it in mind for any future writings of mine.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129622" onclick="return highlight('129622', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129622">&gt;&gt;129622</a><br />Thank you for taking the time to write all this out. A simple rejection letter would have worked, but you took the time to point out my word mix-ups and typos, and now my story is better for it. So again, thank you. Besides the easily fixable errors, I won&#039;t address your critique for this story, but I will keep it in mind for any future writings of mine.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Feb 1st, 2014 15:22</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 114

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Given that on this particular day she is blessed with many wonderful friends and family members, she receives many gifts on her birthday.//
This is odd. "On this particular day" and "she is blessed with many wonderful friends and family" are both valid thoughts, but they're separate. You've made them sound interdependent. She has friends and family on other days, after all.

>one-thousand seven hundred and ninteenth birthday//

Don't put a hyphen there, and it's improper to put an "and" in the number like that.

>She is nonplussed.//

Consider how many people will have to look up that word before they even start on the story. You want to remain accessible.

Story:
>Yes, they washed over her implying that the sun was already high in the sky, which it was.//
Missing a comma for the participle. You also have quite the weather-report opening there, and the whole "her sun" thing is so cliched. Add to that the sheer number of boring "to be" verbs (4 of them in only 3 sentences), and this is a really poor hook.

>She would just a few simple minutes//

Missing word.

>for later possible use, should the occasion ever arise for her to use it//

Repetitive.

>the definition of xanthippe was the third most important thing on the page; the second being a crude drawing of a scowling pegasus mare to drive home the meaning of the word//

Misused semicolon. There is no independent clause after it.

>and thus had a birthday//

You set this off with a comma on one end. Why not the other?

I'm a page or two in now, and I'm just getting crushed under the exposition. A couple of paragraphs is fine, but now you've gone on for paragraph after paragraph of the history and attitudes of this day. There are far more elegant and readable ways of working in exposition gradually and indirectly. The strength of your story is pretty much in the premise alone, and it takes you half your word count to get there.

>She bathed in the perfectly positioned beam of warm sunlight right at the hoof of her bed, and smiled//

Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>For a brief moment, she began panicking.//

And yet I never get that sense from her. Except for these few bland words about it, you never convince me of this. Have a look at the section on show versus tell, too.

>However, everything was cleared up with a simple use of the Royal Canterlot Voice from the mystery pony, as most things tended to be.//

Most things tend to be cleared up by the Royal Canterlot Voice?

>scanned the pile a she chewed//

Typo.

>What book hast she given thee this year?//

if you're going to use archaic language, please get it right. The conjugation for "she" is "hath."

>Yes, We remember that one.//

If she's capitalizing "We" for herself, then why not "thee" for her sister?

>untying the bow that the package was tied//

Repetitive.

>"Thou beguiled us with your subtextual actions, Tia!'//

Mismatched types of quotes. And archaic conjugation again.

>We can figure out who it's from later.//

Whom.

>Dost thou appreciate the gift, sister?//

As a term of address, "Sister" would be capitalized.

>ninety three//

Here's the only spot you'd put a hyphen in a number.

>the head of the squid//

Such phrasings are needlessly indirect. "The squid's head" is much more direct and concise without losing any meaning.

>"I think I'll take him to court tomorrow and see if anypony claims credit for it. I'll be sure to let you know if I find out."//

Yes. You already said as much.

>Luna had denied Celestia's requests to help clean up the mess the two of them had made, part of the party did, admittedly, involve a food fight, and so Celestia was able to go straight to bed.//

The comma before "part" is a splice.

>Just like the other three hundred and sixty-four days of the year, Celestia was woken up by the sound of her alarm clock screeching in her ears.//

So you do a scene break for the short time skip between opening the presents and eating the cake, but you go without one for the entire night?

>Count Vichy's pompous smile flickered when he heard that Luna raised the sun//

This is another issue with the story. There are numerous passages where information is repeated or over-explained. Give the reader some credit.

>Not being able to say that out loud//

Another example of the same. Given that you punctuated it as thought, we already know she didn't say it out lous and can surmise why.

>the Equestrian toy scene would suddenly boom with toy squids//

More word repetition.

>With that bit of excitement passed//

Passed/past confusion.

>A great rush of maternal affection coursed through Celestia, and she hugged Blueblood with her wings and forelegs. Blueblood tensed up, surprised by the embrace//

This is the emotional climax of the story. And the entire context is told to me. There's very little here for me to visualize. You need to paint a picture in my head and let me figure out how they feel from it.

There's not a lot to say that hasn't already been said. The pervasive issues were a weather report opening, long initial info dump, over-explanation, and telly language. I will elaborate on one thing: "to be" verbs. Just do a Ctrl-f for "was" and watch the page light up like a Hearth's Warming tree. Counting all of the more common forms, I came up with 179. That's a ton. It's a little less than one every other sentence, but you tend to use them in clusters, which is a common problem, so they're very locally repetitive. That ratio isn't horrible for a shorter work, but to maintain it over a longer story just gets grating. This is a very boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You need to be choosing more active verbs.

You're also very thin on the conflict or character growth. We get a tiny bit about Blueblood, since his involvement is an unexpected look at his character. But it's a minor point, and neither he nor Celestia show much emotional investment in what happens. She treats the whole thing as more of a curiosity. She's not apparently affected. What was at stake? What changed as a result? What new thing did we learn about a main character? I get that Blueblood's reveal was unexpected, but we're not going to be very invested in someone who doesn't enter the picture until the final few paragraphs. What is it Celestia wants? What bad thing might happen if she doesn't get it? What do we learn about her in the process? An engaging story will address at least one of these.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Given that on this particular day she is blessed with many wonderful friends and family members, she receives many gifts on her birthday.//</span><br />This is odd. &quot;On this particular day&quot; and &quot;she is blessed with many wonderful friends and family&quot; are both valid thoughts, but they&#039;re separate. You&#039;ve made them sound interdependent. She has friends and family on other days, after all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one-thousand seven hundred and ninteenth birthday//</span><br />Don&#039;t put a hyphen there, and it&#039;s improper to put an &quot;and&quot; in the number like that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She is nonplussed.//</span><br />Consider how many people will have to look up that word before they even start on the story. You want to remain accessible.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes, they washed over her implying that the sun was already high in the sky, which it was.//</span><br />Missing a comma for the participle. You also have quite the weather-report opening there, and the whole &quot;her sun&quot; thing is so cliched. Add to that the sheer number of boring &quot;to be&quot; verbs (4 of them in only 3 sentences), and this is a really poor hook.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She would just a few simple minutes//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for later possible use, should the occasion ever arise for her to use it//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the definition of xanthippe was the third most important thing on the page; the second being a crude drawing of a scowling pegasus mare to drive home the meaning of the word//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There is no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and thus had a birthday//</span><br />You set this off with a comma on one end. Why not the other?<br /><br />I&#039;m a page or two in now, and I&#039;m just getting crushed under the exposition. A couple of paragraphs is fine, but now you&#039;ve gone on for paragraph after paragraph of the history and attitudes of this day. There are far more elegant and readable ways of working in exposition gradually and indirectly. The strength of your story is pretty much in the premise alone, and it takes you half your word count to get there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She bathed in the perfectly positioned beam of warm sunlight right at the hoof of her bed, and smiled//</span><br />Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For a brief moment, she began panicking.//</span><br />And yet I never get that sense from her. Except for these few bland words about it, you never convince me of this. Have a look at the section on show versus tell, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;However, everything was cleared up with a simple use of the Royal Canterlot Voice from the mystery pony, as most things tended to be.//</span><br />Most things tend to be cleared up by the Royal Canterlot Voice?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scanned the pile a she chewed//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What book hast she given thee this year?//</span><br />if you&#039;re going to use archaic language, please get it right. The conjugation for &quot;she&quot; is &quot;hath.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes, We remember that one.//</span><br />If she&#039;s capitalizing &quot;We&quot; for herself, then why not &quot;thee&quot; for her sister?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;untying the bow that the package was tied//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Thou beguiled us with your subtextual actions, Tia!&#039;//</span><br />Mismatched types of quotes. And archaic conjugation again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We can figure out who it&#039;s from later.//</span><br />Whom.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dost thou appreciate the gift, sister?//</span><br />As a term of address, &quot;Sister&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ninety three//</span><br />Here&#039;s the only spot you&#039;d put a hyphen in a number.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the head of the squid//</span><br />Such phrasings are needlessly indirect. &quot;The squid&#039;s head&quot; is much more direct and concise without losing any meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I think I&#039;ll take him to court tomorrow and see if anypony claims credit for it. I&#039;ll be sure to let you know if I find out.&quot;//</span><br />Yes. You already said as much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna had denied Celestia&#039;s requests to help clean up the mess the two of them had made, part of the party did, admittedly, involve a food fight, and so Celestia was able to go straight to bed.//</span><br />The comma before &quot;part&quot; is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just like the other three hundred and sixty-four days of the year, Celestia was woken up by the sound of her alarm clock screeching in her ears.//</span><br />So you do a scene break for the short time skip between opening the presents and eating the cake, but you go without one for the entire night?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Count Vichy&#039;s pompous smile flickered when he heard that Luna raised the sun//</span><br />This is another issue with the story. There are numerous passages where information is repeated or over-explained. Give the reader some credit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not being able to say that out loud//</span><br />Another example of the same. Given that you punctuated it as thought, we already know she didn&#039;t say it out lous and can surmise why.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Equestrian toy scene would suddenly boom with toy squids//</span><br />More word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that bit of excitement passed//</span><br />Passed/past confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A great rush of maternal affection coursed through Celestia, and she hugged Blueblood with her wings and forelegs. Blueblood tensed up, surprised by the embrace//</span><br />This is the emotional climax of the story. And the entire context is told to me. There&#039;s very little here for me to visualize. You need to paint a picture in my head and let me figure out how they feel from it.<br /><br />There&#039;s not a lot to say that hasn&#039;t already been said. The pervasive issues were a weather report opening, long initial info dump, over-explanation, and telly language. I will elaborate on one thing: &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Just do a Ctrl-f for &quot;was&quot; and watch the page light up like a Hearth&#039;s Warming tree. Counting all of the more common forms, I came up with 179. That&#039;s a ton. It&#039;s a little less than one every other sentence, but you tend to use them in clusters, which is a common problem, so they&#039;re very locally repetitive. That ratio isn&#039;t horrible for a shorter work, but to maintain it over a longer story just gets grating. This is a very boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />You&#039;re also very thin on the conflict or character growth. We get a tiny bit about Blueblood, since his involvement is an unexpected look at his character. But it&#039;s a minor point, and neither he nor Celestia show much emotional investment in what happens. She treats the whole thing as more of a curiosity. She&#039;s not apparently affected. What was at stake? What changed as a result? What new thing did we learn about a main character? I get that Blueblood&#039;s reveal was unexpected, but we&#039;re not going to be very invested in someone who doesn&#039;t enter the picture until the final few paragraphs. What is it Celestia wants? What bad thing might happen if she doesn&#039;t get it? What do we learn about her in the process? An engaging story will address at least one of these.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 115

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Granny Smith looked to Big Macintosh.//

Watch repeating "looked" so soon after the last time.

>both the color of apple juice//

Not sure why you're repeating that description, either.

>Applejack lie on her side on her bed, facing the wall away from him//

Lay/lie confusion. Also watch the participles. They can often be misplaced modifiers. It sounds like the bed is facing away from him.

>Although the sobbing had gone, it left shuddering motions in her sides in its place.//

Really awkward phrasing.

>OK//

Spell it out as "okay."

>Ah’m allus fine.//

>Y’arready know.//
This is really too much. There are writers who insist on imitating strong accents, but there are several problems with doing so. First, it slows the reader down. Second it presupposes the voice the reader might want to use. Third, since these are predefined characters, the reader already knows how she sounds and will fill that in for you. It's more about word choice and phrasing. A strong visual accent is really a tough thing to get right, especially for a character who gets a lot of lines.

>‘bout//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes wrong. This is backward. I see more of them. You'll need to do a sweep.

>(as he hadn’t come to any sort of conclusion as to what he could, should, couldn’t, or shouldn’t say before)//

Having the narration be this self-aware is really, really clumsy.

>Before he opened his eyes//

You never had him close them…

>Outside the room, Apple Bloom looked at Applejack’s door//

Why the perspective shift? You had me in Big Mac's head, and nothing of note happened with him. Then you jerk me over into Apple Bloom's perspective. If you weren't going to use Big Mac to any significant end, why not start with Apple Bloom from the beginning?

>forlornly//

This is unnecessary. It's telly, for one, but you do more after this to get at her mood in a less blunt manner.

>it was for this reason that Apple Bloom was scared//

Same deal. You might want to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>whose face was still colored with concern//

Telly again, but also very clumsy to have your perspective character note things about herself so externally.

>but found she couldn’t continue//

And now you're in Granny's perspective. Read the section up top about head hopping.

>FIdgeted//

Typo.

>Apple Bloom became afraid.//

The point here is to get us to feel this with her. Noting her emotion as a cold fact is not the way to accomplish that.

>“They din’t live long ‘nuff to make such an impact on yer life ‘s they did ar’s. S’long as we never forget ‘em, an’ keep ‘em in ar hearts, it’ll hurt less an’ less ev’ry year.”//

Just… no. This is such a chore to read.

>B-But//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized no matter what, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>The words refused to leave her mouth, so they left her eyes instead, as tears.//

Okay, I see the poetic meaning you're going for, but this is really strangely phrased.

>She collected herself, and tried again.//

Also see the part about comma use with conjunctions.

>Death ain’t ‘good-bye’. It’s ‘See ya later’.//

Inconsistent capitalization in the quotes.

>'kin//

First, why the mix of plain and fancy quotes, and second, what exactly is the apostrophe contracting? It's an imitative spelling—you haven't removed any letters.

Well, the big things should be obvious. There is a lot of telly language in here, the accents are overwritten to the point of being burdensome to read, and you have a very inconsistent perspective. There's really nothing more to say about that than the reference material I already pointed out.

It's also pretty obvious that Applejack would be crying about her parents, yet you hold it back like it's some surprise. There isn't really any different conflict happening here that hasn't happened in many other stories.

This may warrant a bit more explanation, as canon isn't exactly definitive, but when do you envision this taking place? First, you have AJ's parents die before she went to live in Manehattan. But Apple Bloom must have been quite young at the time, so did Big Mac and Granny Smith really leave her unattended to see AJ off and welcome her home later? And in "The Cutie Mark Chronicles," AJ's pretty forthcoming about why she left town. Does this take place after that episode?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Granny Smith looked to Big Macintosh.//</span><br />Watch repeating &quot;looked&quot; so soon after the last time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;both the color of apple juice//</span><br />Not sure why you&#039;re repeating that description, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack lie on her side on her bed, facing the wall away from him//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. Also watch the participles. They can often be misplaced modifiers. It sounds like the bed is facing away from him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Although the sobbing had gone, it left shuddering motions in her sides in its place.//</span><br />Really awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;OK//</span><br />Spell it out as &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah’m allus fine.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Y’arready know.//</span><br />This is really too much. There are writers who insist on imitating strong accents, but there are several problems with doing so. First, it slows the reader down. Second it presupposes the voice the reader might want to use. Third, since these are predefined characters, the reader already knows how she sounds and will fill that in for you. It&#039;s more about word choice and phrasing. A strong visual accent is really a tough thing to get right, especially for a character who gets a lot of lines.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘bout//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes wrong. This is backward. I see more of them. You&#039;ll need to do a sweep.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(as he hadn’t come to any sort of conclusion as to what he could, should, couldn’t, or shouldn’t say before)//</span><br />Having the narration be this self-aware is really, really clumsy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Before he opened his eyes//</span><br />You never had him close them…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Outside the room, Apple Bloom looked at Applejack’s door//</span><br />Why the perspective shift? You had me in Big Mac&#039;s head, and nothing of note happened with him. Then you jerk me over into Apple Bloom&#039;s perspective. If you weren&#039;t going to use Big Mac to any significant end, why not start with Apple Bloom from the beginning?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;forlornly//</span><br />This is unnecessary. It&#039;s telly, for one, but you do more after this to get at her mood in a less blunt manner.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it was for this reason that Apple Bloom was scared//</span><br />Same deal. You might want to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whose face was still colored with concern//</span><br />Telly again, but also very clumsy to have your perspective character note things about herself so externally.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but found she couldn’t continue//</span><br />And now you&#039;re in Granny&#039;s perspective. Read the section up top about head hopping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;FIdgeted//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom became afraid.//</span><br />The point here is to get us to feel this with her. Noting her emotion as a cold fact is not the way to accomplish that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“They din’t live long ‘nuff to make such an impact on yer life ‘s they did ar’s. S’long as we never forget ‘em, an’ keep ‘em in ar hearts, it’ll hurt less an’ less ev’ry year.”//</span><br />Just… no. This is such a chore to read.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;B-But//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized no matter what, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The words refused to leave her mouth, so they left her eyes instead, as tears.//</span><br />Okay, I see the poetic meaning you&#039;re going for, but this is really strangely phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She collected herself, and tried again.//</span><br />Also see the part about comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Death ain’t ‘good-bye’. It’s ‘See ya later’.//</span><br />Inconsistent capitalization in the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;kin//</span><br />First, why the mix of plain and fancy quotes, and second, what exactly is the apostrophe contracting? It&#039;s an imitative spelling—you haven&#039;t removed any letters.<br /><br />Well, the big things should be obvious. There is a lot of telly language in here, the accents are overwritten to the point of being burdensome to read, and you have a very inconsistent perspective. There&#039;s really nothing more to say about that than the reference material I already pointed out.<br /><br />It&#039;s also pretty obvious that Applejack would be crying about her parents, yet you hold it back like it&#039;s some surprise. There isn&#039;t really any different conflict happening here that hasn&#039;t happened in many other stories.<br /><br />This may warrant a bit more explanation, as canon isn&#039;t exactly definitive, but when do you envision this taking place? First, you have AJ&#039;s parents die before she went to live in Manehattan. But Apple Bloom must have been quite young at the time, so did Big Mac and Granny Smith really leave her unattended to see AJ off and welcome her home later? And in &quot;The Cutie Mark Chronicles,&quot; AJ&#039;s pretty forthcoming about why she left town. Does this take place after that episode?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 116

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Just once I would like to sit with her and actually talk to get, and for her to listen.//
Typo.

>will finally go out…..//

An ellipsis is three dots, and ending a synopsis with one is pretty cliched, anyway.

Story:
>It was a warm, crisp spring day.//
Weather report opening. These are vastly overdone. Your story has a point and characters. Just get to them. Wasting time on the weather only shows that you couldn't think of anything more to say, unless the weather is actually a major plot point. You can work the weather in later.

>as it's light danced across the rolling hills//

Its/it's confusion.

>Maternity Ward//

Why in the world is this capitalized?

>jello//

That's a brand name (Jell-O), one that they presumably wouldn't know in Equestria. Probably better to use "jelly."

>his patience growing thin//

>this, she knew, was her last chance//
You really have to be mindful of whose perspective you want the narrator to emulate, or if you want to keep him outside of any perspective altogether. Look at these examples. The first is in the father's perspective. You don't discuss any external evidence of how someone could tell he felt that way, so you're telling us from inside his head. Likewise for the mother in the second example. Read the section about head hopping at the top of this thread. It'll tell you the rationale behind deciding if and when to shift perspective, but you absolutely shouldn't shift it within a single paragraph, as you've done here.

>"What a sight it was", they always told me, "Seeing the doctor fly up 3 feet in the air, because of a few minute old filly."//

That first comma goes inside the quotes, and there's no need to capitalize "seeing," since it continues the quote from before within the same sentence. There's a section at the top of the thread on dialogue punctuation/capitalization as well. Spell out numbers this short, and hyphenate your compound modifiers (few-minute-old).

>most baby unicorns have magic surges when they are little//

"When they are little" is redundant, since you've already identified them as babies.

>at the time, since she was only a young filly at the time//

Watch close repetition of words and phrases.

>she not get any allowance for a full month//

Syntax is off.

>So she took all of the bits she had saved up, and worked so hard on the dress.//

Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>mom and dad//

When you refer to them in place of names like this (versus a more generic use like "my mom and dad"), they get capitalized.

This extended flashback in italics would be better used as a separate scene. With a proper transition, you wouldn't have to render it in italics. Italics are fine in short bursts, but they get irritating when they go on and on like this. They're intended to make things stand out, but when everything's italicized, it defeats that purpose.

>Yes mommy?//

Missing comma for direct address.

>"I know this is hard on both of you," Mom put her hoof on Rarities shoulder, "Especially you Rarity, since you loved this place so much, and I know we promised to give this place to you once you got older….but this is a big oportunity for us. You two would come with us too. We could all still be together-"//

Where to begin? You've pluralized "Rarity" where you needed a possessive. You've inserted a speech attribution without a speaking verb. You misspelled "opportunity," the capitalization/punctuation pattern is wrong, your ellipsis has too many dots, and you've used a hyphen where you need a dash.

>RARITY!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>My sister became too busy//

This is the third mention of Rarity being busy in the last four sentences. I get the picture.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>Orders flew in because ponies wanted their dresses to be made by one of the Elements of Harmony.//

This might require a bit more justification. There's no evidence in canon that ponies place any importance on this or even recognize them as such.

>-__-//

Seriously? You're going to put emoticons in your text?

>Oh, that old thing, I found it today while I was looking for some fabric.//

That's odd, too. She's sometimes out of touch with her sister, but so much that she'd ruin something she knew meant a lot to her? That's hard to take without some explanation.

>I felt a hoof come up and hit my face.//

And then Rarity hits her for pointing it out? You're losing me. Your left margin is also inconsistent. I at least see you do explain the incident with the dress later on, but she can't come up with a better story? And now it makes even less sense that Rarity would hit her.

>…..//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not here.

>I look around at my surrounds.//

Surroundings

>arguement//

argument

>The nurse's eyes, who I recognized to be Nurse Redheart, widened in shock.//

The "who I recognized" needs to describe something, but it can't describe the nurse, since she doesn't appear in the sentence. Only her eyes do.

>Applebloom, and Scootaloo all piled into the room//

Weren't they already in there? If not, whom did she hear when she woke up?

>" Um…I'm//

Extraneous space, and it's standard to leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it's a leading one or followed by punctuation.

>I don't even know why I asked, after everything she has said and done//

Tense shift.

>S-she//

Consider what sound she would actually be repeating. Sh-she

>No Rarity."//

Missing the opening quotation marks. And a comma for direct address, for that matter.

>Her were cheeks//

Typo.

>you never had anymore time for me//

In this instance "any more" needs to be two words.

>never to busy for your other friends//

To/too confusion.

>ruinning//

Not sure why I'm seeing this many obvious spelling errors. Any word processing software will catch these.

>with a large amethyst in the middle, and small diamonds surrounding it, the amethyst in the shape of a music note//

See how the focus wanders? It goes from the amethyst to the diamonds, and, oh yeah, something else about the amethyst.

>She rubbed the top of my head, "Sweetie Belle//

You can't just attach any given action to speech with a comma. There has to be a speaking action.

>"I hope so too." A voice said.//

And here's the opposite problem. You do have a speaking action, but you haven't punctuated/capitalized it as an attribution.

>I lid down//

Typo, but it also looks like you were about to pick the wrong one of the lay/lie combo.

>Meanwhile, after I had fallen asleep, Rarity had walked outside of my room, to speak with the doctor.//

Wait, how is she narrating events she didn't witness? Unless you tell me how she knows this or you have a framing story in which it makes sense, you don't do that with a first-person narrator.

>When she was hit by the cart, it must have triggered something in that part of her brain, and now the tumor has now begun to grow again//

Okay. How can he possibly know this? He's never seen it before now, so how does he know whether it's grown or not? And she hasn't been in the hospital very long. Even if the accident somehow caused it to grow again, t wouldn't be measurable yet.

>W-what will happen if she does get the operation.//

That's a question. Shouldn't it have a question mark?

>She can get a brain transplant.//

What? How would she even still be Sweetie Belle?

>Not many ponies that age WANT to donate.//

Why would any want to donate? A pony can't exactly live without a brain, so even a 100% success rate is still breaking even. And if you mean only transplanting part of the brain, you've already said that the part of Sweetie Belle's that needs to be removed would likely kill her, so how are the odds any better than that for a donor? There are some serious plausibility problems here. And her head's much bigger than Sweetie Belle's. How will her brain even fit in there?

>They only donors//

Typo.

>lil'//

You see this spelling in commercial use often enough, but the correct spelling is li'l.

>Ya'll//

Y'all

>Get better, Sugarcube//

That's not a nickname specific to Sweetie Belle. It's just a generic term of endearment, so it wouldn't be capitalized.

>Unfortunately, all ponies who do transplant brains do die.//

So those willing donors you mentioned earlier basically wanted to die. That's pretty creepy.

>They tried to smile as they lead Rarity out of the room.//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>one I haven't received from her in a long time//

Verb tense.

>Time Turner looked towards Rarity as I went in the operating room.//

Why the scene break? There's no shift in time, place, or perspective.

>She thinks that when she wakes up, I'll be right there by her side//

You're having Sweetie Belle narrate this, but it's presumably something she doesn't actually witness, since she'd certainly have a reaction to it, but we get none.

>I looked towards the window; It was almost morning in Ponyville.//

Don't capitalize after a semicolon.

> I raised my hoof gently to my head. The pain was almost gone, but still slightly there. I put my hoof to my head//

So she puts her hoof to her head twice?

>Replacing it was a series of stitches that made a line around my entire head.//

She'd have a bandage covering that, surely.

>"Sweetie, we have something to tell you."//

And this is why this whole scenario is incredibly cruel to Sweetie Belle. To put all this on her? And if I'm Rarity, I'm going to be put off by the fact that absolutely everyone accepted my decision without question. Sure shows the relative value they place on her and Sweetie Belle.

>The bright, bubbly mare was no staring at the floor//

Typo.

>She could not cheer her up, for she was also suffering.//

Vague pronoun use. I can't tell who's doing what.

>My parents were sat just next to me//

Phrasing.

>adress//

You ran these two words together.

>Recalling that memory left a whole in my shattered heart.//

hole

>She then used it to wiped her own.//

Verb form.

>We all walked through a long, golden hallway of the castle that lead to a garden full of statues.//

"Led" again.

>I gazed up at them for what seemed like hours, just gazing at their beauty.//

So she gazed, you say.

>besides my sister and I//

This is actually a spot for "me."

>I never thought to much on it.//

To/too confusion again.

>mean't//

Why in the world is that apostrophe there?

>I couldn't just go to Canterlot everyday//

In this usage, "every day" needs to be two words.

>elements//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this.

>A single tear dropped down her check//

Typo, and this is one of the most cliched things you could have possibly done.

Song lyrics…

This is an actual song that Sarah McLachlan sang. You know using non-MLP copyrighted lyrics is against FiMFiction's policy, right?

>It was a fire ruby in the shape of a heart, the same one that Spike had given to Rarity//

Doesn't this imply a lot of disturbing things? First, what did the gem have to do with Sweetie Belle or how she got her cutie mark? It's awfully indirect, saying that the song which caused it was inspired by Rarity, because wouldn't that mean her talent was singing things that had to do with Rarity? And what does this imply about her relationship with Spike? That she's going to inherit his crush? This is also pretty creepy.

>as she looking down upon the world//

Phrasing.

I'd encourage you to use the [hr] bbcode character or something short and centered for scene breaks. The dashes you're drawing can go for multiple lines on a phone.

There's a mixed bag of mechanical problems, all pervasive, but not too many of them consistent, and all are certainly fixable. Really, the big problem here is the plot, and there are two tiers of it. On a fundamental level, some of the things that happen just don't make sense. I've pointed out quite a few of them, like how there's apparently an availability of donor brains, even though this always results in the donor's death. Why are these ponies signing up to be donors? On another level, there are things that potentially could make sense, but don't with the amount of explanation we get. For instance, I can believe that Rarity would be willing to make a sacrifice of this magnitude for her sister, but the context for doing it is nonexistent, so she just makes a snap decision and nobody tries to reason through it with her. I can't believe everypony thinks this is a good idea or is at least neutral about it. I can't just make that leap for you that her decision makes sense. You have to get me there.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just once I would like to sit with her and actually talk to get, and for her to listen.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;will finally go out…..//</span><br />An ellipsis is three dots, and ending a synopsis with one is pretty cliched, anyway.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a warm, crisp spring day.//</span><br />Weather report opening. These are vastly overdone. Your story has a point and characters. Just get to them. Wasting time on the weather only shows that you couldn&#039;t think of anything more to say, unless the weather is actually a major plot point. You can work the weather in later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as it&#039;s light danced across the rolling hills//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maternity Ward//</span><br />Why in the world is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;jello//</span><br />That&#039;s a brand name (Jell-O), one that they presumably wouldn&#039;t know in Equestria. Probably better to use &quot;jelly.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his patience growing thin//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this, she knew, was her last chance//</span><br />You really have to be mindful of whose perspective you want the narrator to emulate, or if you want to keep him outside of any perspective altogether. Look at these examples. The first is in the father&#039;s perspective. You don&#039;t discuss any external evidence of how someone could tell he felt that way, so you&#039;re telling us from inside his head. Likewise for the mother in the second example. Read the section about head hopping at the top of this thread. It&#039;ll tell you the rationale behind deciding if and when to shift perspective, but you absolutely shouldn&#039;t shift it within a single paragraph, as you&#039;ve done here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;What a sight it was&quot;, they always told me, &quot;Seeing the doctor fly up 3 feet in the air, because of a few minute old filly.&quot;//</span><br />That first comma goes inside the quotes, and there&#039;s no need to capitalize &quot;seeing,&quot; since it continues the quote from before within the same sentence. There&#039;s a section at the top of the thread on dialogue punctuation/capitalization as well. Spell out numbers this short, and hyphenate your compound modifiers (few-minute-old).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;most baby unicorns have magic surges when they are little//</span><br />&quot;When they are little&quot; is redundant, since you&#039;ve already identified them as babies.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at the time, since she was only a young filly at the time//</span><br />Watch close repetition of words and phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she not get any allowance for a full month//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So she took all of the bits she had saved up, and worked so hard on the dress.//</span><br />Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mom and dad//</span><br />When you refer to them in place of names like this (versus a more generic use like &quot;my mom and dad&quot;), they get capitalized.<br /><br />This extended flashback in italics would be better used as a separate scene. With a proper transition, you wouldn&#039;t have to render it in italics. Italics are fine in short bursts, but they get irritating when they go on and on like this. They&#039;re intended to make things stand out, but when everything&#039;s italicized, it defeats that purpose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes mommy?//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I know this is hard on both of you,&quot; Mom put her hoof on Rarities shoulder, &quot;Especially you Rarity, since you loved this place so much, and I know we promised to give this place to you once you got older….but this is a big oportunity for us. You two would come with us too. We could all still be together-&quot;//</span><br />Where to begin? You&#039;ve pluralized &quot;Rarity&quot; where you needed a possessive. You&#039;ve inserted a speech attribution without a speaking verb. You misspelled &quot;opportunity,&quot; the capitalization/punctuation pattern is wrong, your ellipsis has too many dots, and you&#039;ve used a hyphen where you need a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;RARITY!!//</span><br />One exclamation mark is plenty.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My sister became too busy//</span><br />This is the third mention of Rarity being busy in the last four sentences. I get the picture.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Orders flew in because ponies wanted their dresses to be made by one of the Elements of Harmony.//</span><br />This might require a bit more justification. There&#039;s no evidence in canon that ponies place any importance on this or even recognize them as such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;-__-//</span><br />Seriously? You&#039;re going to put emoticons in your text?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, that old thing, I found it today while I was looking for some fabric.//</span><br />That&#039;s odd, too. She&#039;s sometimes out of touch with her sister, but so much that she&#039;d ruin something she knew meant a lot to her? That&#039;s hard to take without some explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I felt a hoof come up and hit my face.//</span><br />And then Rarity hits her for pointing it out? You&#039;re losing me. Your left margin is also inconsistent. I at least see you do explain the incident with the dress later on, but she can&#039;t come up with a better story? And now it makes even less sense that Rarity would hit her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…..//</span><br />This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I look around at my surrounds.//</span><br />Surroundings<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;arguement//</span><br />argument<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The nurse&#039;s eyes, who I recognized to be Nurse Redheart, widened in shock.//</span><br />The &quot;who I recognized&quot; needs to describe something, but it can&#039;t describe the nurse, since she doesn&#039;t appear in the sentence. Only her eyes do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom, and Scootaloo all piled into the room//</span><br />Weren&#039;t they already in there? If not, whom did she hear when she woke up?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot; Um…I&#039;m//</span><br />Extraneous space, and it&#039;s standard to leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it&#039;s a leading one or followed by punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t even know why I asked, after everything she has said and done//</span><br />Tense shift.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S-she//</span><br />Consider what sound she would actually be repeating. Sh-she<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No Rarity.&quot;//</span><br />Missing the opening quotation marks. And a comma for direct address, for that matter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her were cheeks//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you never had anymore time for me//</span><br />In this instance &quot;any more&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;never to busy for your other friends//</span><br />To/too confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ruinning//</span><br />Not sure why I&#039;m seeing this many obvious spelling errors. Any word processing software will catch these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a large amethyst in the middle, and small diamonds surrounding it, the amethyst in the shape of a music note//</span><br />See how the focus wanders? It goes from the amethyst to the diamonds, and, oh yeah, something else about the amethyst.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She rubbed the top of my head, &quot;Sweetie Belle//</span><br />You can&#039;t just attach any given action to speech with a comma. There has to be a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I hope so too.&quot; A voice said.//</span><br />And here&#039;s the opposite problem. You do have a speaking action, but you haven&#039;t punctuated/capitalized it as an attribution.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I lid down//</span><br />Typo, but it also looks like you were about to pick the wrong one of the lay/lie combo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Meanwhile, after I had fallen asleep, Rarity had walked outside of my room, to speak with the doctor.//</span><br />Wait, how is she narrating events she didn&#039;t witness? Unless you tell me how she knows this or you have a framing story in which it makes sense, you don&#039;t do that with a first-person narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When she was hit by the cart, it must have triggered something in that part of her brain, and now the tumor has now begun to grow again//</span><br />Okay. How can he possibly know this? He&#039;s never seen it before now, so how does he know whether it&#039;s grown or not? And she hasn&#039;t been in the hospital very long. Even if the accident somehow caused it to grow again, t wouldn&#039;t be measurable yet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;W-what will happen if she does get the operation.//</span><br />That&#039;s a question. Shouldn&#039;t it have a question mark?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She can get a brain transplant.//</span><br />What? How would she even still be Sweetie Belle?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not many ponies that age WANT to donate.//</span><br />Why would any want to donate? A pony can&#039;t exactly live without a brain, so even a 100% success rate is still breaking even. And if you mean only transplanting part of the brain, you&#039;ve already said that the part of Sweetie Belle&#039;s that needs to be removed would likely kill her, so how are the odds any better than that for a donor? There are some serious plausibility problems here. And her head&#039;s much bigger than Sweetie Belle&#039;s. How will her brain even fit in there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They only donors//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lil&#039;//</span><br />You see this spelling in commercial use often enough, but the correct spelling is li&#039;l.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ya&#039;ll//</span><br />Y&#039;all<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Get better, Sugarcube//</span><br />That&#039;s not a nickname specific to Sweetie Belle. It&#039;s just a generic term of endearment, so it wouldn&#039;t be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Unfortunately, all ponies who do transplant brains do die.//</span><br />So those willing donors you mentioned earlier basically wanted to die. That&#039;s pretty creepy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They tried to smile as they lead Rarity out of the room.//</span><br />The past tense of &quot;lead&quot; is &quot;led.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one I haven&#039;t received from her in a long time//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Time Turner looked towards Rarity as I went in the operating room.//</span><br />Why the scene break? There&#039;s no shift in time, place, or perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She thinks that when she wakes up, I&#039;ll be right there by her side//</span><br />You&#039;re having Sweetie Belle narrate this, but it&#039;s presumably something she doesn&#039;t actually witness, since she&#039;d certainly have a reaction to it, but we get none. <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I looked towards the window; It was almost morning in Ponyville.//</span><br />Don&#039;t capitalize after a semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; I raised my hoof gently to my head. The pain was almost gone, but still slightly there. I put my hoof to my head//</span><br />So she puts her hoof to her head twice?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Replacing it was a series of stitches that made a line around my entire head.//</span><br />She&#039;d have a bandage covering that, surely.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Sweetie, we have something to tell you.&quot;//</span><br />And this is why this whole scenario is incredibly cruel to Sweetie Belle. To put all this on her? And if I&#039;m Rarity, I&#039;m going to be put off by the fact that absolutely everyone accepted my decision without question. Sure shows the relative value they place on her and Sweetie Belle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The bright, bubbly mare was no staring at the floor//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could not cheer her up, for she was also suffering.//</span><br />Vague pronoun use. I can&#039;t tell who&#039;s doing what.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My parents were sat just next to me//</span><br />Phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;adress//</span><br />You ran these two words together.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Recalling that memory left a whole in my shattered heart.//</span><br />hole<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She then used it to wiped her own.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We all walked through a long, golden hallway of the castle that lead to a garden full of statues.//</span><br />&quot;Led&quot; again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I gazed up at them for what seemed like hours, just gazing at their beauty.//</span><br />So she gazed, you say.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;besides my sister and I//</span><br />This is actually a spot for &quot;me.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I never thought to much on it.//</span><br />To/too confusion again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mean&#039;t//</span><br />Why in the world is that apostrophe there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I couldn&#039;t just go to Canterlot everyday//</span><br />In this usage, &quot;every day&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;elements//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at capitalizing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A single tear dropped down her check//</span><br />Typo, and this is one of the most cliched things you could have possibly done.<br /><br />Song lyrics…<br /><br />This is an actual song that Sarah McLachlan sang. You know using non-MLP copyrighted lyrics is against FiMFiction&#039;s policy, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a fire ruby in the shape of a heart, the same one that Spike had given to Rarity//</span><br />Doesn&#039;t this imply a lot of disturbing things? First, what did the gem have to do with Sweetie Belle or how she got her cutie mark? It&#039;s awfully indirect, saying that the song which caused it was inspired by Rarity, because wouldn&#039;t that mean her talent was singing things that had to do with Rarity? And what does this imply about her relationship with Spike? That she&#039;s going to inherit his crush? This is also pretty creepy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she looking down upon the world//</span><br />Phrasing.<br /><br />I&#039;d encourage you to use the [hr] bbcode character or something short and centered for scene breaks. The dashes you&#039;re drawing can go for multiple lines on a phone.<br /><br />There&#039;s a mixed bag of mechanical problems, all pervasive, but not too many of them consistent, and all are certainly fixable. Really, the big problem here is the plot, and there are two tiers of it. On a fundamental level, some of the things that happen just don&#039;t make sense. I&#039;ve pointed out quite a few of them, like how there&#039;s apparently an availability of donor brains, even though this always results in the donor&#039;s death. Why are these ponies signing up to be donors? On another level, there are things that potentially could make sense, but don&#039;t with the amount of explanation we get. For instance, I can believe that Rarity would be willing to make a sacrifice of this magnitude for her sister, but the context for doing it is nonexistent, so she just makes a snap decision and nobody tries to reason through it with her. I can&#039;t believe everypony thinks this is a good idea or is at least neutral about it. I can&#039;t just make that leap for you that her decision makes sense. You have to get me there.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 117

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Wonderbolt’s//

As used, it's a noun adjunct, and a plural one at that. You don't need the apostrophe.

>and I am immune to both poison and foodborne illness//

This feels more like a headcanon inclusion. What relevance does it have to the letter's message, and isn't it something Twilight would already know about her? This is the type of thing that makes letter-based stories or even the inclusion of a letter difficult to do well. You really need to think about what would be reasonable to put in the letter without using it as a device for infodump or exposition. And it's "food-borne."

>foals play//

I believe you intended a meaning more like foal's play.

>she thought, as she helped herself to more soup//

Why is this in past tense?

>What was the intent?//

This is the 17th "to be" verb in the first two paragraphs alone. This is bringing the action to a shuddering standstill. It's far more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is, and the beginning of the story (insofar as this is effectively the first chapter), is a crucial spot to draw the reader into the characters and action. You really need to be using primarily active verbs.

>It is a detail of her environment, but not an important one. Catalogued, but without much importance to it.//

You're giving me some narrative whiplash. Take these lines from earlier:
>Well, no. That’s a lie. It’s actually incredibly important//
These lines come from deep in Twilight's perspective, essentially making her the narrator. But here, your narrator, while still adopting an informal tone, is decidedly external to her. She'd be awfully self-aware about her thought process to comment on it this way. I don't buy that she'd actually follow the train of thought like this .

>farm-stuff//

Why is this hyphenated?

>wellbeing//

well-being

>will-of-the-wisp//

Typically, will-o'-the-wisp. Again later in the chapter.

>The letter had been there//

The use of past perfect would be appropriate in a past-tense narration, but you're using present, so go with simple past here.

>Applejack says, cutting Pinkie off with a chuckle//

This is the first bit of characterization I get from any of her lunch companions, outside of what they say. Their part is rather bland. They're not doing anything. They might as well be statues.

>She is analyzing, picturing. She sees the map of the farmhouse and barn and the areas around it as she knows them.//

See, this is much better than the spots I marked earlier. It still gets us in her analytical mood, but in a way that's more personal to her.

>tryin’//

I wouldn't recommend doing this with Pinkie, especially since Applejack's getting a lot of dialogue here. It's not really an affectation Pinkie uses, and it makes their speech blend together.

>Twilight notices for the first time that Rarity has quite moved on past lunch and on to tea//

You just mentioned that she was still chewing, so this doesn't quite make sense, unless you specifying what she's eating, so I know it's not a lunch item, but mentioning it earlier kind of precludes doing so here. Might take a bit of restructuring.

>Less than five hundred words.//

This is a really odd thing to say. It smacks of you looking at the FiMFic word count to make a factual statement, but I can't see Twilight actually counting them.

>saw the latter//

Saw the latter what? I don't see a list of options anywhere. Maybe you meant "letter"?

>as if life was a dissertation//

Subjunctive mood needed here for the hypothetical. "as if life were"

>she has kept the regiment up//

Unless she's joined the military as well, you want "regimen."

>“Do they have coffee?” she asks, blinking. The sun is far, far too bright.//

And she's already commented that soup was a bad choice. ("It's so damn hot! Milk… was a bad choice." Sorry.) She wouldn't think the same thing here about a hot drink?

>It is no problem ‘t all, my dear.//

Your apostrophe is backward, but when has Rarity ever used this contraction?

>I found her on the couch this morning.//

Okay, now I have the context, but why did Rainbow stop by the library before going home? It doesn't make sense. She's familiar enough with the town to find Rarity's home in the dark, particularly since it's apparently her home now, too. It makes that earlier encounter a contrived reason to have Dash and Twilight interact. I see later, this gets a bit of an explanation, but it's weak, especially since Rarity was surprised Dash didn't go upstairs. I can't tell whether you're implying Dash just needed to get away, Rarity suspects she has a thing for Twilight, etc.

>Twilight has dared to try it only once, and the experience haunts her nightmares in an absurd fashion.//

How so? Without knowing, it's a bland fact. If you're trying to inject some humor, it's worth a little extra attention, and if not, you don't need this.

>Florid description has its place, she decides with certainty, like a mason laying brick.//

I don't get the comparison. There's no inherent parallel, and you don't make one.

>But, regardless//

These are redundant.

>A were about barrenness//

Missing word.

>mending.They//

Missing space.

>You took my by surprise.//

Typo.

>Twilight reaches out hesitantly with a hoof then put it down.//

Mismatched verb tenses.

>How could she tell?//

Verb tense again.

>T-thank //

Think about what sound would actually be repeated. Th-thank

>I think a lot depends on you answer.//

Typo.

>food choice seem strange//

Yes, and everyone's choice of beverage, too.

>Am I being foolish?//

You're starting to wander outside what feels like natural conversation. A prepared speech, yes, but this is very fancy language for an off-the-cuff discussion, and people don't normally use direct address this frequently. What she's saying is fine, and the wording itself is nicely crafted at first glance, but it just doesn't feel authentic. Can you imagine two people at the next table in a coffee shop speaking like this?

>pegasi spirit//

Noun adjuncts are almost always singular.

>I’m going to head home now if I may take my leave of you.//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>confidant//

Confidant/confident confusion.

I'll go ahead and comment on this chapter in lieu of waiting until the end. This is the kind of chapter I have to be in the right mood to enjoy, and I'm more forgiving in this regard than many readers. I actually liked it, but I'm not sold on its purpose. It does a great job of setting up a mood, and the character interactions were great (just watch the number of times you directly tell me how someone feels, either through the exact word, like "sad," or through an adverb form, like "happily"—it's forcing a distance from the characters that isn't good for engagement). There's barely a connection between what happens here and the stated plot progression in the synopsis or Celestia's letter. If either had mentioned a little more specifically that the vague things being wrong included interpersonal relationships (and I'm taking a bit of a leap to think this is a symptom of your overarching conflict), this would tie in directly. But without any such link, all I have to go along with the theme so far is these strange happenings with the grass and road. There are some great slice-of-life things happening in this chapter, but they go on far too long to be a nice sidetrack, and I don't see that there's a point yet. It's not that I don't trust there will be eventually, but you can only dangle that carrot so long before I give up and find something else to read. It really wouldn't take much—just give me some bread crumbs to make it obvious this is leading somewhere. If it ends up that you could have cut most of this chapter without affecting the story, then that's absolutely what you should do. Or if this is all important, let me see it. You spend so much time deep in Twilight's thoughts, so why is the majority of it incredibly vague with respect to her worries about her friends? There's a default amount she'd get anyway, since they're her friends, and I'm not getting anything above and beyond that. Honestly, it feels like she's far more concerned about these circles.

>man//

On the fence about this word choice, as canon has had to bow to using some human-centric words before, but it seems like you could get away with using "staff" here.

>your highness//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>storms and//

Extraneous space.

>phenemon//

Phenomena

>who I have sworn to secrecy//

whom

>rutts//

ruts

It's wholly unnecessary for your two letter chapters to be italicized. First, they're already set apart as separate from everything else, and it's obvious they're letters, so you don't need to make that distinction. Casting a letter in italics is only necessary if it's short enough that it doesn't even warrant being its own scene. Second, italics make things stand out, and by having the entire chapter italicized in both cases, you've explicitly shown me that nothing stands out. Not to mention that extended italics get irritating to read.

In the end, I think this story is promising. The mood and interpersonal moments are good, but my top three items would be to make me see during chapter two that these happenings are connected to the overall plot (Twilight coldly noted them all without presenting any suspicions that this was the case), watch where the narrative tone switches to something that feels external to Twilight, and watch the telly language (there's a short discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread, if you need a refresher). As a related note, watch the number of "to be" verbs as well. A decent number of these are tied up in the telly language.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wonderbolt’s//</span><br />As used, it&#039;s a noun adjunct, and a plural one at that. You don&#039;t need the apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and I am immune to both poison and foodborne illness//</span><br />This feels more like a headcanon inclusion. What relevance does it have to the letter&#039;s message, and isn&#039;t it something Twilight would already know about her? This is the type of thing that makes letter-based stories or even the inclusion of a letter difficult to do well. You really need to think about what would be reasonable to put in the letter without using it as a device for infodump or exposition. And it&#039;s &quot;food-borne.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;foals play//</span><br />I believe you intended a meaning more like foal&#039;s play.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she thought, as she helped herself to more soup//</span><br />Why is this in past tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What was the intent?//</span><br />This is the 17th &quot;to be&quot; verb in the first two paragraphs alone. This is bringing the action to a shuddering standstill. It&#039;s far more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is, and the beginning of the story (insofar as this is effectively the first chapter), is a crucial spot to draw the reader into the characters and action. You really need to be using primarily active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It is a detail of her environment, but not an important one. Catalogued, but without much importance to it.//</span><br />You&#039;re giving me some narrative whiplash. Take these lines from earlier:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well, no. That’s a lie. It’s actually incredibly important//</span><br />These lines come from deep in Twilight&#039;s perspective, essentially making her the narrator. But here, your narrator, while still adopting an informal tone, is decidedly external to her. She&#039;d be awfully self-aware about her thought process to comment on it this way. I don&#039;t buy that she&#039;d actually follow the train of thought like this .<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;farm-stuff//</span><br />Why is this hyphenated?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wellbeing//</span><br />well-being<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;will-of-the-wisp//</span><br />Typically, will-o&#039;-the-wisp. Again later in the chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The letter had been there//</span><br />The use of past perfect would be appropriate in a past-tense narration, but you&#039;re using present, so go with simple past here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack says, cutting Pinkie off with a chuckle//</span><br />This is the first bit of characterization I get from any of her lunch companions, outside of what they say. Their part is rather bland. They&#039;re not doing anything. They might as well be statues.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She is analyzing, picturing. She sees the map of the farmhouse and barn and the areas around it as she knows them.//</span><br />See, this is much better than the spots I marked earlier. It still gets us in her analytical mood, but in a way that&#039;s more personal to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tryin’//</span><br />I wouldn&#039;t recommend doing this with Pinkie, especially since Applejack&#039;s getting a lot of dialogue here. It&#039;s not really an affectation Pinkie uses, and it makes their speech blend together.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight notices for the first time that Rarity has quite moved on past lunch and on to tea//</span><br />You just mentioned that she was still chewing, so this doesn&#039;t quite make sense, unless you specifying what she&#039;s eating, so I know it&#039;s not a lunch item, but mentioning it earlier kind of precludes doing so here. Might take a bit of restructuring.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Less than five hundred words.//</span><br />This is a really odd thing to say. It smacks of you looking at the FiMFic word count to make a factual statement, but I can&#039;t see Twilight actually counting them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saw the latter//</span><br />Saw the latter what? I don&#039;t see a list of options anywhere. Maybe you meant &quot;letter&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as if life was a dissertation//</span><br />Subjunctive mood needed here for the hypothetical. &quot;as if life were&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she has kept the regiment up//</span><br />Unless she&#039;s joined the military as well, you want &quot;regimen.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Do they have coffee?” she asks, blinking. The sun is far, far too bright.//</span><br />And she&#039;s already commented that soup was a bad choice. (&quot;It&#039;s so damn hot! Milk… was a bad choice.&quot; Sorry.) She wouldn&#039;t think the same thing here about a hot drink?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It is no problem ‘t all, my dear.//</span><br />Your apostrophe is backward, but when has Rarity ever used this contraction?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I found her on the couch this morning.//</span><br />Okay, now I have the context, but why did Rainbow stop by the library before going home? It doesn&#039;t make sense. She&#039;s familiar enough with the town to find Rarity&#039;s home in the dark, particularly since it&#039;s apparently her home now, too. It makes that earlier encounter a contrived reason to have Dash and Twilight interact. I see later, this gets a bit of an explanation, but it&#039;s weak, especially since Rarity was surprised Dash didn&#039;t go upstairs. I can&#039;t tell whether you&#039;re implying Dash just needed to get away, Rarity suspects she has a thing for Twilight, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight has dared to try it only once, and the experience haunts her nightmares in an absurd fashion.//</span><br />How so? Without knowing, it&#039;s a bland fact. If you&#039;re trying to inject some humor, it&#039;s worth a little extra attention, and if not, you don&#039;t need this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Florid description has its place, she decides with certainty, like a mason laying brick.//</span><br />I don&#039;t get the comparison. There&#039;s no inherent parallel, and you don&#039;t make one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But, regardless//</span><br />These are redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A were about barrenness//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mending.They//</span><br />Missing space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You took my by surprise.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight reaches out hesitantly with a hoof then put it down.//</span><br />Mismatched verb tenses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How could she tell?//</span><br />Verb tense again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-thank //</span><br />Think about what sound would actually be repeated. Th-thank<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I think a lot depends on you answer.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;food choice seem strange//</span><br />Yes, and everyone&#039;s choice of beverage, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Am I being foolish?//</span><br />You&#039;re starting to wander outside what feels like natural conversation. A prepared speech, yes, but this is very fancy language for an off-the-cuff discussion, and people don&#039;t normally use direct address this frequently. What she&#039;s saying is fine, and the wording itself is nicely crafted at first glance, but it just doesn&#039;t feel authentic. Can you imagine two people at the next table in a coffee shop speaking like this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pegasi spirit//</span><br />Noun adjuncts are almost always singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m going to head home now if I may take my leave of you.//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;confidant//</span><br />Confidant/confident confusion.<br /><br />I&#039;ll go ahead and comment on this chapter in lieu of waiting until the end. This is the kind of chapter I have to be in the right mood to enjoy, and I&#039;m more forgiving in this regard than many readers. I actually liked it, but I&#039;m not sold on its purpose. It does a great job of setting up a mood, and the character interactions were great (just watch the number of times you directly tell me how someone feels, either through the exact word, like &quot;sad,&quot; or through an adverb form, like &quot;happily&quot;—it&#039;s forcing a distance from the characters that isn&#039;t good for engagement). There&#039;s barely a connection between what happens here and the stated plot progression in the synopsis or Celestia&#039;s letter. If either had mentioned a little more specifically that the vague things being wrong included interpersonal relationships (and I&#039;m taking a bit of a leap to think this is a symptom of your overarching conflict), this would tie in directly. But without any such link, all I have to go along with the theme so far is these strange happenings with the grass and road. There are some great slice-of-life things happening in this chapter, but they go on far too long to be a nice sidetrack, and I don&#039;t see that there&#039;s a point yet. It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t trust there will be eventually, but you can only dangle that carrot so long before I give up and find something else to read. It really wouldn&#039;t take much—just give me some bread crumbs to make it obvious this is leading somewhere. If it ends up that you could have cut most of this chapter without affecting the story, then that&#039;s absolutely what you should do. Or if this is all important, let me see it. You spend so much time deep in Twilight&#039;s thoughts, so why is the majority of it incredibly vague with respect to her worries about her friends? There&#039;s a default amount she&#039;d get anyway, since they&#039;re her friends, and I&#039;m not getting anything above and beyond that. Honestly, it feels like she&#039;s far more concerned about these circles.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;man//</span><br />On the fence about this word choice, as canon has had to bow to using some human-centric words before, but it seems like you could get away with using &quot;staff&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your highness//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;storms and//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;phenemon//</span><br />Phenomena<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who I have sworn to secrecy//</span><br />whom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rutts//</span><br />ruts<br /><br />It&#039;s wholly unnecessary for your two letter chapters to be italicized. First, they&#039;re already set apart as separate from everything else, and it&#039;s obvious they&#039;re letters, so you don&#039;t need to make that distinction. Casting a letter in italics is only necessary if it&#039;s short enough that it doesn&#039;t even warrant being its own scene. Second, italics make things stand out, and by having the entire chapter italicized in both cases, you&#039;ve explicitly shown me that nothing stands out. Not to mention that extended italics get irritating to read.<br /><br />In the end, I think this story is promising. The mood and interpersonal moments are good, but my top three items would be to make me see during chapter two that these happenings are connected to the overall plot (Twilight coldly noted them all without presenting any suspicions that this was the case), watch where the narrative tone switches to something that feels external to Twilight, and watch the telly language (there&#039;s a short discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread, if you need a refresher). As a related note, watch the number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs as well. A decent number of these are tied up in the telly language.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Feb 11th, 2014 19:39</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 118

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The only critique I'd make of the synopsis is that it only has a short time to grab the reader's interest. It's best to avoid boring "to be" verbs in favor of something active there, and the couple you have wouldn't be hard to replace.

>The slight rise of pressure in her ear was the first tell.//

Pronouns work by antecedent. I've never been a fan of a character's first introduction being via pronoun. If you're trying to create an aura of mystery, a generic term is fine.

>soddened//

"Sodden" is already an adjective. Why are you making a fake verb out of it, and a passive one at that?

>NOW!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty, and italics are preferred for emphasis.

>ok//

Spell it out as "okay."

>Thunder Lane//

Not sure if there's an actual canon spelling, but I've always seen it as one word.

>All she got in response was a look of abject terror//

This is little more than a cold fact unless you show it to me. In some places, that may be enough, but not here where you're trying to create an engaging action sequence right at the beginning of the story.

>rain driven//

Needs a hyphen for the compound descriptor.

>street-by-street, block-by-block//

Hyphens not needed on these.

>Golden Oak library//

Oaks, and "Library" would also be capitalized.

>was broken by the piercing scream//

Passive voice is a bad choice for an action sequence.

>But Rainbow Dash knew that she was no ordinary pegasus. She was the Captain of the weather team, the best flyer in Equestria, a lock for a future spot on the Wonderbolts squad, and most importantly, the Element of Loyalty.//

This all feels really contrived. She's faced with a huge storm, has only seconds to spare, and this is the train of thought she follows? You're slamming on the brakes in the middle of a race.

>a worried look//

You're directly informing me of character emotions an awful lot. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>fogged up//

Another spot where you need a hyphen.

>an audible groan//

Redundant. If it's not audible, it's not a groan, is it?

>spinning - neither//

Please use a proper dash.

>asked Rainbow, as she tried to pull Cloud Kicker off of a clearly blacked out Thunder Lane.//

Note that using a comma with an "as" clause tends to create a meaning of "because."

>"I… Oof… I don't know.//

Earlier in the story, you didn't leave a space after an ellipsis. Be consistent.

>Doing her best to support the injured leg, Rainbow guided Cloud Kicker a few steps to her left and slowly sat her down onto the ledge of the now over-flowing fountain.//

"Overflowing" is one word. Through this section of the story, you're completely undercutting any sense of urgency you'd created before. This wall cloud was supposed to be some hellish thing that would rip apart Ponyville if they didn't do anything to stop it. Well, they didn't get the chance to, and yet: 1) There's absolutely no damage to the town going on, and 2) they're not having any trouble moving around in the weather and are making no attempt to find shelter. A quadruped can limp on three legs well enough, and if this storm has such a legendary fury, and there's debris from the town flying about, wouldn't that be their primary concern?

>The leading edge of the left wing was clearly broken, the normally solid, smooth bone line rough and out of alignment. No bones had broken through//

Huh? It's broken but… not broken? I get what you're saing, but the language is confusing and misleading.

>a vicious shot of pain raced from his damaged wing straight through the rest of his body//

Watch your perspective. You've been in Dash's alone so far, but the way you tell it, this is in his head. Keep your point of view in mind as you write so that you only shift perspective when it's necessary and constructive to do so.

>betraying the pain he was trying to hide with sheer stubbornness//

Most participial phrases should be set off with a comma.

>Yeah, I'm ok//

This is already the 7th use of ok in this scene. Watch the repetition.

>But,//

Commas directly after conjunction are rarely used correctly. This one is not.

>totally unused to using her left hoof for such motions//

Really? It's a little awkward, but would s person really have such a hard time using their off hand to take off goggles that it'd be worth mentioning?

>and this storm's only getting worse! We need to find some shelter//

This is coming very late in the game to be convincing.

>There's mostly businesses here Dash//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>shop keepers//

One word.

>unless you want to break into a store//

And given their injuries, does she really think anyone would blame her?

>A thought clicked in Rainbow's head. The library was just a few blocks past the edge of the square//

But she was already thinking about the library before. You went on for a while about how she longed to be back there. And then she suddenly forgets all about it?

>Just the thought of the bookish unicorn sent her mind racing back to what was supposed to be the biggest event of the night.//

And you're doing it again. While her mind should be primarily on her colleagues, the weather, and her own discomfort, you're going to have her reminisce? What this tells me is that the storm and her friends' injuries are minor enough that she can let her mind wander.

>Since her first introduction to the bookish unicorn//

Second use of that exact descriptor in this paragraph alone, and you're courting the edge of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.

>the nerdy librarian//

And still in the same paragraph. Yeah, definitely LUS. There's a section on that at the top of this thread.

>'Fluttershy may be right',

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>But I'll never know if I don't ask her.

Dialogue capitalization. There's a section for this, too.

>day dream//

One word.

>the incessant assault of rain, wind, and flying debris//

So incessant that it's barely warranted mention? And I counted only one piece of debris.

>the accompanying thunder clap blowing out what few windows remained in Bon Bon's candy store//

You're really crossing the line from realism into movie-type theatrics here. And you've basically said here that there were already some windows blown out in the store. So why the earlier comment about not wanting to break into a store? They could have gotten in there.

>before the incessant lightning found its mark//

Right about here, I'm also noticing that you've repeated "debris" and "incessant" within a few short paragraphs of each other. The more unusual a word is, the less you can get away with repeating it. And what makes them think they'd get struck by lightning? They're next to a bunch of buildings… and headed toward an isolated tree.

>a flash that would have rivaled the sun itself//

The light and heat are generally more intense than the sun…

>water-logged//

waterlogged

>payment for its untimely destruction. Rainbow paid//

Watch that word repetition again.

>Taking a gulp of acrid air//

Your sentence structure is getting in a rut. Every sentence in this paragraph starts with a participle, and two of them tack another on the end. Also note that participles imply concurrent action, and you've got some events in these that wouldn't logically happen simultaneously.

>trapped as she was//

Neither one of them can break that window?

>Seeing the confused look on Rainbow's face//

Watch that perspective again.

>Still, her mind tore at itself, squeezing everything it had into the slowly growing magenta orb at the tip of her horn.//

Yeah, maybe you ought to read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>the hardened glass proving as resilient against her repeated blows as it normally did against the elements//

Consider how well Dash did against the bell-ring test in "Fall Weather Friends." And how she dive-bombed Applejack's old barn into oblivion. I don't buy that a simple window is giving her this much trouble.

>again when Twilight's face again//

More repetition.

>WHY HER, WHY… HY… HY…//

This is really over the top. Effective sad stories usually play more off subtlety than melodrama. Pull it back some.

>the pony that saved her life - and in doing so, captured her heart//

That's not exactly a healthy attitude…

>somewhat jagged scar about an inch long//

And she doesn't remember this at all? Twilight's going to great lengths to infodump it to her as well. This is crossing the line from natural conversation to gratuitous exposition.

>until you came to visit me in the hospital//

If she waited that long to get stitches, they're not going to do her much good.

>still budding//

Yet another term that needs to be hyphenated. I've skipped over quite a few. But they're living together, and you'd still refer to it as budding?

>ghost as it wreaked havoc on Rainbow's mind, twisting her heroism into increasingly ghastly//

More repetition.

The two biggest issues in my mind are the telly language and the logical inconsistencies in the plot. I realize the latter can be justified through dream logic, but at that point, the reader doesn't know it's a dream, and you obviously don't want to let on that it is in order to relieve that disbelief. So you're left with quite a few situations that don't make sense, and you can't have the reader carrying that through thousands of words before it gets explained.

There was also quite a bit of repetition of words, phrases, and sentence structures. One in particular I want to touch on is your use of "to be" verbs. Here is what I counted in chapter 2 alone: was/wasn't - 65, were/weren't - 14, is/isn't - 4, be/been/being - 16. There will be others hidden in contractions, too, but there are 99 already. That's not awful for this word count—roughly one every 3 or 3.5 sentences—but it could stand to be spruced up. These are very boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. Look to use more active verbs.

You also have a really abbreviated conflict at the end, which never gets resolved. Twilight attempts to help Dash, and while it's not necessary to take us all the way through to complete healing, but we're barely introduced to the mechanism for even addressing the conflict when the story ends, and without any indication as to how effective it is.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />The only critique I&#039;d make of the synopsis is that it only has a short time to grab the reader&#039;s interest. It&#039;s best to avoid boring &quot;to be&quot; verbs in favor of something active there, and the couple you have wouldn&#039;t be hard to replace.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The slight rise of pressure in her ear was the first tell.//</span><br />Pronouns work by antecedent. I&#039;ve never been a fan of a character&#039;s first introduction being via pronoun. If you&#039;re trying to create an aura of mystery, a generic term is fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;soddened//</span><br />&quot;Sodden&quot; is already an adjective. Why are you making a fake verb out of it, and a passive one at that?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;NOW!!//</span><br />One exclamation mark is plenty, and italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ok//</span><br />Spell it out as &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thunder Lane//</span><br />Not sure if there&#039;s an actual canon spelling, but I&#039;ve always seen it as one word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All she got in response was a look of abject terror//</span><br />This is little more than a cold fact unless you show it to me. In some places, that may be enough, but not here where you&#039;re trying to create an engaging action sequence right at the beginning of the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rain driven//</span><br />Needs a hyphen for the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;street-by-street, block-by-block//</span><br />Hyphens not needed on these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Golden Oak library//</span><br />Oaks, and &quot;Library&quot; would also be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was broken by the piercing scream//</span><br />Passive voice is a bad choice for an action sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But Rainbow Dash knew that she was no ordinary pegasus. She was the Captain of the weather team, the best flyer in Equestria, a lock for a future spot on the Wonderbolts squad, and most importantly, the Element of Loyalty.//</span><br />This all feels really contrived. She&#039;s faced with a huge storm, has only seconds to spare, and this is the train of thought she follows? You&#039;re slamming on the brakes in the middle of a race.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a worried look//</span><br />You&#039;re directly informing me of character emotions an awful lot. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fogged up//</span><br />Another spot where you need a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an audible groan//</span><br />Redundant. If it&#039;s not audible, it&#039;s not a groan, is it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spinning - neither//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;asked Rainbow, as she tried to pull Cloud Kicker off of a clearly blacked out Thunder Lane.//</span><br />Note that using a comma with an &quot;as&quot; clause tends to create a meaning of &quot;because.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I… Oof… I don&#039;t know.//</span><br />Earlier in the story, you didn&#039;t leave a space after an ellipsis. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Doing her best to support the injured leg, Rainbow guided Cloud Kicker a few steps to her left and slowly sat her down onto the ledge of the now over-flowing fountain.//</span><br />&quot;Overflowing&quot; is one word. Through this section of the story, you&#039;re completely undercutting any sense of urgency you&#039;d created before. This wall cloud was supposed to be some hellish thing that would rip apart Ponyville if they didn&#039;t do anything to stop it. Well, they didn&#039;t get the chance to, and yet: 1) There&#039;s absolutely no damage to the town going on, and 2) they&#039;re not having any trouble moving around in the weather and are making no attempt to find shelter. A quadruped can limp on three legs well enough, and if this storm has such a legendary fury, and there&#039;s debris from the town flying about, wouldn&#039;t that be their primary concern?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The leading edge of the left wing was clearly broken, the normally solid, smooth bone line rough and out of alignment. No bones had broken through//</span><br />Huh? It&#039;s broken but… not broken? I get what you&#039;re saing, but the language is confusing and misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a vicious shot of pain raced from his damaged wing straight through the rest of his body//</span><br />Watch your perspective. You&#039;ve been in Dash&#039;s alone so far, but the way you tell it, this is in his head. Keep your point of view in mind as you write so that you only shift perspective when it&#039;s necessary and constructive to do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;betraying the pain he was trying to hide with sheer stubbornness//</span><br />Most participial phrases should be set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, I&#039;m ok//</span><br />This is already the 7th use of ok in this scene. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But,//</span><br />Commas directly after conjunction are rarely used correctly. This one is not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;totally unused to using her left hoof for such motions//</span><br />Really? It&#039;s a little awkward, but would s person really have such a hard time using their off hand to take off goggles that it&#039;d be worth mentioning?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and this storm&#039;s only getting worse! We need to find some shelter//</span><br />This is coming very late in the game to be convincing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s mostly businesses here Dash//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shop keepers//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unless you want to break into a store//</span><br />And given their injuries, does she really think anyone would blame her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A thought clicked in Rainbow&#039;s head. The library was just a few blocks past the edge of the square//</span><br />But she was already thinking about the library before. You went on for a while about how she longed to be back there. And then she suddenly forgets all about it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just the thought of the bookish unicorn sent her mind racing back to what was supposed to be the biggest event of the night.//</span><br />And you&#039;re doing it again. While her mind should be primarily on her colleagues, the weather, and her own discomfort, you&#039;re going to have her reminisce? What this tells me is that the storm and her friends&#039; injuries are minor enough that she can let her mind wander.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Since her first introduction to the bookish unicorn//</span><br />Second use of that exact descriptor in this paragraph alone, and you&#039;re courting the edge of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the nerdy librarian//</span><br />And still in the same paragraph. Yeah, definitely LUS. There&#039;s a section on that at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>&#039;Fluttershy may be right&#039;,</i></span><br />Comma goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>But I&#039;ll never know if I don&#039;t ask her.</i></span><br />Dialogue capitalization. There&#039;s a section for this, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;day dream//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the incessant assault of rain, wind, and flying debris//</span><br />So incessant that it&#039;s barely warranted mention? And I counted only one piece of debris.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the accompanying thunder clap blowing out what few windows remained in Bon Bon&#039;s candy store//</span><br />You&#039;re really crossing the line from realism into movie-type theatrics here. And you&#039;ve basically said here that there were already some windows blown out in the store. So why the earlier comment about not wanting to break into a store? They could have gotten in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;before the incessant lightning found its mark//</span><br />Right about here, I&#039;m also noticing that you&#039;ve repeated &quot;debris&quot; and &quot;incessant&quot; within a few short paragraphs of each other. The more unusual a word is, the less you can get away with repeating it. And what makes them think they&#039;d get struck by lightning? They&#039;re next to a bunch of buildings… and headed toward an isolated tree.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a flash that would have rivaled the sun itself//</span><br />The light and heat are generally more intense than the sun…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;water-logged//</span><br />waterlogged<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;payment for its untimely destruction. Rainbow paid//</span><br />Watch that word repetition again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Taking a gulp of acrid air//</span><br />Your sentence structure is getting in a rut. Every sentence in this paragraph starts with a participle, and two of them tack another on the end. Also note that participles imply concurrent action, and you&#039;ve got some events in these that wouldn&#039;t logically happen simultaneously.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trapped as she was//</span><br />Neither one of them can break that window?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Seeing the confused look on Rainbow&#039;s face//</span><br />Watch that perspective again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Still, her mind tore at itself, squeezing everything it had into the slowly growing magenta orb at the tip of her horn.//</span><br />Yeah, maybe you ought to read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the hardened glass proving as resilient against her repeated blows as it normally did against the elements//</span><br />Consider how well Dash did against the bell-ring test in &quot;Fall Weather Friends.&quot; And how she dive-bombed Applejack&#039;s old barn into oblivion. I don&#039;t buy that a simple window is giving her this much trouble.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;again when Twilight&#039;s face again//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;WHY HER, WHY… HY… HY…//</span><br />This is really over the top. Effective sad stories usually play more off subtlety than melodrama. Pull it back some.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the pony that saved her life - and in doing so, captured her heart//</span><br />That&#039;s not exactly a healthy attitude…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;somewhat jagged scar about an inch long//</span><br />And she doesn&#039;t remember this at all? Twilight&#039;s going to great lengths to infodump it to her as well. This is crossing the line from natural conversation to gratuitous exposition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;until you came to visit me in the hospital//</span><br />If she waited that long to get stitches, they&#039;re not going to do her much good.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still budding//</span><br />Yet another term that needs to be hyphenated. I&#039;ve skipped over quite a few. But they&#039;re living together, and you&#039;d still refer to it as budding?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ghost as it wreaked havoc on Rainbow&#039;s mind, twisting her heroism into increasingly ghastly//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br />The two biggest issues in my mind are the telly language and the logical inconsistencies in the plot. I realize the latter can be justified through dream logic, but at that point, the reader doesn&#039;t know it&#039;s a dream, and you obviously don&#039;t want to let on that it is in order to relieve that disbelief. So you&#039;re left with quite a few situations that don&#039;t make sense, and you can&#039;t have the reader carrying that through thousands of words before it gets explained.<br /><br />There was also quite a bit of repetition of words, phrases, and sentence structures. One in particular I want to touch on is your use of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Here is what I counted in chapter 2 alone: was/wasn&#039;t - 65, were/weren&#039;t - 14, is/isn&#039;t - 4, be/been/being - 16. There will be others hidden in contractions, too, but there are 99 already. That&#039;s not awful for this word count—roughly one every 3 or 3.5 sentences—but it could stand to be spruced up. These are very boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. Look to use more active verbs.<br /><br />You also have a really abbreviated conflict at the end, which never gets resolved. Twilight attempts to help Dash, and while it&#039;s not necessary to take us all the way through to complete healing, but we&#039;re barely introduced to the mechanism for even addressing the conflict when the story ends, and without any indication as to how effective it is.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 119

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Well, that synopsis leaves a lot to be desired. It tells me absolutely nothing. I honestly get more from the title.

>Before Fluttershy could say a word, she was grabbed by the tail and pulled into a nearby alleyway.//

>a stallion walked by, did a double take, then with only a brief sentence of explanation, started dragging her off//
These are seemingly contradictory.

>average sized//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors.

>Shocked, and more than a little nervous//

Yow. Get me to figure this out from how she looks and acts. Don't just tell me. You should read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>His expression softened, then said//

His expression spoke?

>(!)//

Don't do that.

>Think about others, next time//

You have quite a few unnecessary commas. This one, for instance.

>He turned back to the alley entrance and stood guard.//

You ought to break up these paragraphs. You have five disjoint pieces of speech in this one, and it gets a bit cumbersome to have more than two or three. If you really have that much action to put between the dialogue, that action is probably important enough to warrant a bit more focus than getting lost in the middle of a paragraph.

>Keep your head in the game.//

This long exposition via heard-but-not-heard monologue comes across as pretty clumsy. These aren't things he'd reasonably say out loud. Do you normally go around admitting you find someone attractive, then speculating on their gender, all while within their earshot? There are better ways to get across what he's thinking than this.

>(it came with the apartment. Ah, the fridge, not the carrots. Those he bought)//

Enough with the parentheticals already. I was letting them slide, even though they don't work too well outside of a first-person narrator, but you're bombarding me with them now. Any time you do something that calls attention to the writing itself in an abstract sense, that's a bad thing.

>And no, he didn't name her, so shut up//

Before, he'd seemingly addressed "you" to these unspecified hatchlings, but here, he's pretty clearly speaking to the reader. Do not do this lightly. First, you haven't kept up a narration that will do so throughout the story, so it feels out if place. Second, by involving me, you've opened a can of worms. I need a reason to be there as much as any of the other characters do. So why does he want we to hear this story? Why do I want to listen? Under what circumstances is he telling it?

>expected. He'd expected//

Watch the repetition.

>your highness//

Capitalize the honorific.

>'Everypony', so why can't we have 'Everybuggy'//

In this usage, they don't need to be capitalized.

>and chose not to//

She's being awfully trusting here. He already said why he wouldn't want Chrysalis to have it, but he could have plenty of other motives regarding it. And that's assuming they can even trust him. Why is Twilight taking everything he says at face value?

>Cricket smiled, and said//

Also see the section up top about comma use with conjunctions.

>line….//

Four dots in an ellipsis, and you're using an awful lot of them.

>that proclaimed him to be a (probationary) citizen of Equestria//

Okay, so we're apparently going to skip all the stuff about what makes him trustworthy and how much this means to him. That's kind of the only conflict you had going, and you've completely disarmed it.

>or if he needed to do so as a form of self-defense//

And who gets to judge what is justified? All of the use of this ability by any changeling ever could be argued as self-defense.

>Stupid, Fluttershy, now you've gone and hurt his feelings…//

You'd done a good job previously of keeping each chapter within a single character's perspective. What little subjective flavor you'd used in this one placed it in Twilight's head, but now you're in Fluttershy's. Is the shift necessary? Could you instead narrate one of their parts as perceived by someone else instead of from their viewpoint? Have a look at the section on head hopping at the top of this thread for a rationale.

>Rather than being offended, Fluttershy was surprised to see he was blushing//

Participial phrases can often be misplaced modifiers. Your leading one seems to describe Fluttershy, but that's not your intent.

>His cheeks turned a bright blue when he blushed//

Why? Insect blood isn't blue, at least not that I've ever seen.

>she felt twinge of//

Missing word.

>It contained everything he felt he'd need//

And now you're in Mole's perspective. You really need to give this some thought. But also note that you were in Fluttershy's point of view earlier in the same paragraph, which is a big no-no.

>She was such a cute little thing, she wondered how she and Angel Bunny would get along//

Comma splice. And who is doing the wondering here? I can't tell if you mean Fluttershy or Mole's bunny.

>it was Commander Mole Cricket//

And you've never indicated that Fluttershy knows this about him.

>S-Sorry//

Unless it's a proper noun, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>NOW, DROP AND GIVE ME FIFTY!!!//

Italics are preferred for emphasis, and one exclamation mark is plenty.

>A great many things happened at once//

Yes you just got through using that conceit. It feels repetitive to say it again.

Doesn't seem like a long list of problems, but unfortunately, what's wrong here aren't things that will take a quick fix. First, the emotions are conveyed almost exclusively through telling. The perspective hops around in the last chapter, and there are a few plot problems.

On a specific note about word repetition, you use an awful lot of "to be" verbs. I counted over 70 in your longest chapter alone, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. These are boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs.

Dash is suddenly going to obey a perceived enemy just because he has an authoritative voice? There's absurdity for the sake of comedy, and then there are things that just plain don't make sense. You're also pretty weak on the conflict. There's barely any tension here. Everything just proceeds smoothly on to a nice, happy resolution. You have a minor one in Mole trying to get citizenship, but 1) it's not something he's been working for, 2) he just has it dropped in his lap, 3) there are never any obstacles in his path, and 4) the big moment happens off-screen. A story needs something to drive it forward, and that something is usually conflict of character growth. For the former, what does he want, what is he willing to do to get it, what bad thing will happen if he doesn't? For the latter, what new thing do we learn about a character, and how does he change as a result? It's a nice series of scenes, and it's clever how you used Fluttershy's fangs, but there's not a story arc here.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Well, that synopsis leaves a lot to be desired. It tells me absolutely nothing. I honestly get more from the title.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Before Fluttershy could say a word, she was grabbed by the tail and pulled into a nearby alleyway.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a stallion walked by, did a double take, then with only a brief sentence of explanation, started dragging her off//</span><br />These are seemingly contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;average sized//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shocked, and more than a little nervous//</span><br />Yow. Get me to figure this out from how she looks and acts. Don&#039;t just tell me. You should read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His expression softened, then said//</span><br />His expression spoke?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(!)//</span><br />Don&#039;t do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Think about others, next time//</span><br />You have quite a few unnecessary commas. This one, for instance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He turned back to the alley entrance and stood guard.//</span><br />You ought to break up these paragraphs. You have five disjoint pieces of speech in this one, and it gets a bit cumbersome to have more than two or three. If you really have that much action to put between the dialogue, that action is probably important enough to warrant a bit more focus than getting lost in the middle of a paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Keep your head in the game.//</span><br />This long exposition via heard-but-not-heard monologue comes across as pretty clumsy. These aren&#039;t things he&#039;d reasonably say out loud. Do you normally go around admitting you find someone attractive, then speculating on their gender, all while within their earshot? There are better ways to get across what he&#039;s thinking than this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(it came with the apartment. Ah, the fridge, not the carrots. Those he bought)//</span><br />Enough with the parentheticals already. I was letting them slide, even though they don&#039;t work too well outside of a first-person narrator, but you&#039;re bombarding me with them now. Any time you do something that calls attention to the writing itself in an abstract sense, that&#039;s a bad thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And no, he didn&#039;t name her, so shut up//</span><br />Before, he&#039;d seemingly addressed &quot;you&quot; to these unspecified hatchlings, but here, he&#039;s pretty clearly speaking to the reader. Do not do this lightly. First, you haven&#039;t kept up a narration that will do so throughout the story, so it feels out if place. Second, by involving me, you&#039;ve opened a can of worms. I need a reason to be there as much as any of the other characters do. So why does he want we to hear this story? Why do I want to listen? Under what circumstances is he telling it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;expected. He&#039;d expected//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your highness//</span><br />Capitalize the honorific.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;Everypony&#039;, so why can&#039;t we have &#039;Everybuggy&#039;//</span><br />In this usage, they don&#039;t need to be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and chose not to//</span><br />She&#039;s being awfully trusting here. He already said why he wouldn&#039;t want Chrysalis to have it, but he could have plenty of other motives regarding it. And that&#039;s assuming they can even trust him. Why is Twilight taking everything he says at face value?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cricket smiled, and said//</span><br />Also see the section up top about comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;line….//</span><br />Four dots in an ellipsis, and you&#039;re using an awful lot of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that proclaimed him to be a (probationary) citizen of Equestria//</span><br />Okay, so we&#039;re apparently going to skip all the stuff about what makes him trustworthy and how much this means to him. That&#039;s kind of the only conflict you had going, and you&#039;ve completely disarmed it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or if he needed to do so as a form of self-defense//</span><br />And who gets to judge what is justified? All of the use of this ability by any changeling ever could be argued as self-defense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Stupid, Fluttershy, now you&#039;ve gone and hurt his feelings…//</span><br />You&#039;d done a good job previously of keeping each chapter within a single character&#039;s perspective. What little subjective flavor you&#039;d used in this one placed it in Twilight&#039;s head, but now you&#039;re in Fluttershy&#039;s. Is the shift necessary? Could you instead narrate one of their parts as perceived by someone else instead of from their viewpoint? Have a look at the section on head hopping at the top of this thread for a rationale.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rather than being offended, Fluttershy was surprised to see he was blushing//</span><br />Participial phrases can often be misplaced modifiers. Your leading one seems to describe Fluttershy, but that&#039;s not your intent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His cheeks turned a bright blue when he blushed//</span><br />Why? Insect blood isn&#039;t blue, at least not that I&#039;ve ever seen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she felt twinge of//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It contained everything he felt he&#039;d need//</span><br />And now you&#039;re in Mole&#039;s perspective. You really need to give this some thought. But also note that you were in Fluttershy&#039;s point of view earlier in the same paragraph, which is a big no-no.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was such a cute little thing, she wondered how she and Angel Bunny would get along//</span><br />Comma splice. And who is doing the wondering here? I can&#039;t tell if you mean Fluttershy or Mole&#039;s bunny.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it was Commander Mole Cricket//</span><br />And you&#039;ve never indicated that Fluttershy knows this about him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S-Sorry//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a proper noun, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;NOW, DROP AND GIVE ME FIFTY!!!//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis, and one exclamation mark is plenty.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A great many things happened at once//</span><br />Yes you just got through using that conceit. It feels repetitive to say it again.<br /><br />Doesn&#039;t seem like a long list of problems, but unfortunately, what&#039;s wrong here aren&#039;t things that will take a quick fix. First, the emotions are conveyed almost exclusively through telling. The perspective hops around in the last chapter, and there are a few plot problems.<br /><br />On a specific note about word repetition, you use an awful lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. I counted over 70 in your longest chapter alone, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. These are boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />Dash is suddenly going to obey a perceived enemy just because he has an authoritative voice? There&#039;s absurdity for the sake of comedy, and then there are things that just plain don&#039;t make sense. You&#039;re also pretty weak on the conflict. There&#039;s barely any tension here. Everything just proceeds smoothly on to a nice, happy resolution. You have a minor one in Mole trying to get citizenship, but 1) it&#039;s not something he&#039;s been working for, 2) he just has it dropped in his lap, 3) there are never any obstacles in his path, and 4) the big moment happens off-screen. A story needs something to drive it forward, and that something is usually conflict of character growth. For the former, what does he want, what is he willing to do to get it, what bad thing will happen if he doesn&#039;t? For the latter, what new thing do we learn about a character, and how does he change as a result? It&#039;s a nice series of scenes, and it&#039;s clever how you used Fluttershy&#039;s fangs, but there&#039;s not a story arc here.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 120

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>A lifetime of strict regiments//
While this could possibly mean something as written, I have to think you meant "regimens."

>that rivaled that of Canterlot's Royal Guard; a template for order and leadership//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it.

>100%//

Write out numbers this short.

Story:
>Manual labor, management, engineering;//
There you go with the semicolon again. A colon or dash would work here.

>having barely discovered what ‘stage-fright’ was in her late twenties.//

Stage fright. And I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

>17//

Write out the numbers.

>wanted to flat out jump her bones//

And given how many of these you imply there are, she's still never been asked on a date? And given her personality, as you've established it, why doesn't she ask someone else? She's a take-charge type, so I'm not getting why it isn't a viable option.

>being been//

Typo.

>But at the hooves of Rainbow ‘Professionalism’ Dash, Harshwhinny tasted only defeat.//

This is a completed action in the story's past, so use past perfect tense (had tasted). And finally we're getting to something remotely to do with the story's plot. That was a big wall of exposition to have to wade through so far. There are more elegant ways to work it into the narration. The readers are here to see things happen. Get to them already.

>her looked forward//

Typo.

>nd thus//

Typo.

>“Yoo-hoo!”//

And now, roughly 40% of the way into the story, something actually happens. We start out with a lengthy expository section that defines her character, then we get some action, but it's all narrated. We don't see her interact with any of it, and even the little bits of dialogue are alluded to instead of presented. That's not how to engage a reader.

>Harshwhinny grit her teeth//

Gritted.

>completely forgetting how much she hated lemons//

Given that this happens after she eats the first one, wouldn't it be a good idea to mention it then and give some explanation as to why she does it?

>business mare//

That would be one word, as with the human equivalent.

>stayed silent//

Missing a conjunction here? It's a possible stylistic choice but you haven't been using it so far, so this sticks out as being an oversight.

>wouldn’t'//

Extraneous punctuation.

>counter top//

One word.

>Miss Dash!//

The standard is to italicize a ? or ! that's on an italicized word.

>I—“//

Smart quotes break sometimes, and dashes are one of the usual culprits. These quotes are backward.

>‘cause//

And leading apostrophes would be the other common thing that breaks them.

>squad of empty glassed//

Typo.

>…//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not here.

First, watch your semicolon usage. You didn't attempt many, but every single one of them was wrong.

I was hoping for some depth to the romance, but this is really nothing more than a fling. You haven't made a stab at showing that Harshwhinny has any actual feelings for Dash. She's just looking for a fling, and going for something that has no emotional investment, even if that investment isn't in Dash herself, leaves everything feeling shallow. That can work if you're going for the laughs, but this isn't a comedy.

She thinks of Dash with disdain, but no more than those coworkers whom she used on occasion. And she lamented never being asked on a date, and this situation hasn't changed that. Sure, Dash asked her to dance, but Harshwhinny is the one being forward at the end, so it hasn't alleviated that tension, either. So I'm left wondering exactly what conflict you were trying to set up and how it's resolved. Harshwhinny's situation doesn't seem any different than it was before, except that she's taken up with someone she normally wouldn't have. But if that's improved her self-esteem or her life in any way, I can't tell.

Coupling that with the hefty starting exposition and the subsequent narrative-only beginning of the action, and it just doesn't come across as very engaging.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A lifetime of strict regiments//</span><br />While this could possibly mean something as written, I have to think you meant &quot;regimens.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that rivaled that of Canterlot&#039;s Royal Guard; a template for order and leadership//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;100%//</span><br />Write out numbers this short.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Manual labor, management, engineering;//</span><br />There you go with the semicolon again. A colon or dash would work here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;having barely discovered what ‘stage-fright’ was in her late twenties.//</span><br />Stage fright. And I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;17//</span><br />Write out the numbers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wanted to flat out jump her bones//</span><br />And given how many of these you imply there are, she&#039;s still never been asked on a date? And given her personality, as you&#039;ve established it, why doesn&#039;t she ask someone else? She&#039;s a take-charge type, so I&#039;m not getting why it isn&#039;t a viable option.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;being been//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But at the hooves of Rainbow ‘Professionalism’ Dash, Harshwhinny tasted only defeat.//</span><br />This is a completed action in the story&#039;s past, so use past perfect tense (had tasted). And finally we&#039;re getting to something remotely to do with the story&#039;s plot. That was a big wall of exposition to have to wade through so far. There are more elegant ways to work it into the narration. The readers are here to see things happen. Get to them already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her looked forward//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nd thus//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yoo-hoo!”//</span><br />And now, roughly 40% of the way into the story, something actually happens. We start out with a lengthy expository section that defines her character, then we get some action, but it&#039;s all narrated. We don&#039;t see her interact with any of it, and even the little bits of dialogue are alluded to instead of presented. That&#039;s not how to engage a reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Harshwhinny grit her teeth//</span><br />Gritted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;completely forgetting how much she hated lemons//</span><br />Given that this happens after she eats the first one, wouldn&#039;t it be a good idea to mention it then and give some explanation as to why she does it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;business mare//</span><br />That would be one word, as with the human equivalent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stayed silent//</span><br />Missing a conjunction here? It&#039;s a possible stylistic choice but you haven&#039;t been using it so far, so this sticks out as being an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wouldn’t&#039;//</span><br />Extraneous punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;counter top//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Miss Dash</i>!//</span><br />The standard is to italicize a ? or ! that&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I—“//</span><br />Smart quotes break sometimes, and dashes are one of the usual culprits. These quotes are backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br />And leading apostrophes would be the other common thing that breaks them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;squad of empty glassed//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…//</span><br />This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not here.<br /><br />First, watch your semicolon usage. You didn&#039;t attempt many, but every single one of them was wrong.<br /><br />I was hoping for some depth to the romance, but this is really nothing more than a fling. You haven&#039;t made a stab at showing that Harshwhinny has any actual feelings for Dash. She&#039;s just looking for a fling, and going for something that has no emotional investment, even if that investment isn&#039;t in Dash herself, leaves everything feeling shallow. That can work if you&#039;re going for the laughs, but this isn&#039;t a comedy.<br /><br />She thinks of Dash with disdain, but no more than those coworkers whom she used on occasion. And she lamented never being asked on a date, and this situation hasn&#039;t changed that. Sure, Dash asked her to dance, but Harshwhinny is the one being forward at the end, so it hasn&#039;t alleviated that tension, either. So I&#039;m left wondering exactly what conflict you were trying to set up and how it&#039;s resolved. Harshwhinny&#039;s situation doesn&#039;t seem any different than it was before, except that she&#039;s taken up with someone she normally wouldn&#039;t have. But if that&#039;s improved her self-esteem or her life in any way, I can&#039;t tell.<br /><br />Coupling that with the hefty starting exposition and the subsequent narrative-only beginning of the action, and it just doesn&#039;t come across as very engaging.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Thu, Feb 13th, 2014 22:48</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 121

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Chiselle loves her job as a sculptress and it provides her with some income.//
Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>she cannot sustain herself on her art alone and often take on side jobs to make ends meet//

Subject/verb agreement.

>Will all of her dreams come true, or will she decide it's too much?//

Rhetorical questions are pretty cliched and unproductive in a synopsis.

Story:
>‘Who has time to brush their mane a hundred times, every day?’//
Single quotes or italics. You don't need both.

>The pony//

I'm not sure yet how much of a problem this is going to be, but you're skirting Lavender Unicorn Syndrome here. There's also a section up top about this. As LUS goes, this is an incredibly boring and generic descriptor to use. Pronouns and names are your friends.

>“Who could that be? I don’t open up for another hour,”//

She could just as easily wonder this in the narration. Having characters talk to themselves in unrealistic ways is a quick method for hurting characterization.

>The unicorn opened the door to find a tall, tan-colored earth pony with dark red mane wearing a blue suit and hat.//

Okay, personal opinion time. This is not at all a reason for rejection. I know that the color schemes make physical appearance more interesting than it might be for a human character, and many readers in the fandom like seeing these descriptions for every new character, but I'd urge you to consider whether any of it is really relevant. If there's something about his appearance that becomes important at some point or gives us some insight into his character, that's fine, but if I forget every one of these details, is it going to make any difference at all? Consider how often we get very basic descriptions of characters in mainstream /classic literature, or sometimes no description at all.

>n’//

'n'

>Drumstick//

Maybe you're saying something about his character by doing this. We'll see, but my first impression is that it's odd for him not to simply sign it "Dad."

>her mouth formed a huge grin as she happily skipped back into the kitchen//

The "happily" is a pretty telly word choice, but you don't even need it here. We already get her mood from the grin and the skipping.

>She placed the telegram onto the kitchen’s counter, suddenly she started giggling and skipped in place.//

Comma splice. And more skipping already? Unless you do something to acknowledge that it's repeated or use it in some thematic sense, this feels like an oversight.

>The young girl enjoyed French toast and coffee as she read the morning paper.//

After being so happy, this paragraph describes nothing but a daily routine. She sure doesn't sound like she's any happier than normal.

>two section//

Typo.

>The final piece of the studio laid in a cabinet//

Lay/lie confusion.

>He was wearing a safety vest and hard hat which complimented his gruff face.//

Compliment/complement confusion. Unless you mean his clothes had nice things to say…

>Hello Digger//

Missing comma for direct address.

>dad//

When using "Dad" in place of his name, capitalize it.

>“Welcome to Chip Off The Block!” Chiselle cheerfully sang to a white stallion that just entered. “Yes, yes, I’m here to place an order,” The earth pony replied in a haughty accent as he adjusted his purple bowtie//

You've got two speakers in the same paragraph, a capitalization error for the dialogue tag on the second one, and you're missing the period at the end of the paragraph. And it's "bow tie."

>Pegasus//

You aren't capitalizing the other races, so this would refer specifically to the Greek mythological figure.

>‘til//

Smart quotes get leading apostrophes wrong. This one's backward.

>Chiselle looked away and blushed, “Well//

You can't just attach any action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action.

>the blocks marble//

Missing word.

>The black mane unicorn//

black-maned

>one of the large block//

Typo.

>till//

You spelled this as 'til earlier. Be consistent.

>but-//

Please use a proper dash.

>“Good, I was wondering if you could cover the leading edge of the wings in gold foil.”//

This is the ninth straight paragraph of nothing but speech. There's also an entry on talking heads at the top of this thread that you should read.

>storefronts’//

Misplaced apostrophe. There's only one storefront.

>buttoned up shirt//

I wonder if you meant button-up?

>face. “Rut,”//

Extraneous space.

>The Pegasi sighed//

pegasus

>T-Thank//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Th-thank.

>Her left green eye twitched//

"Green" is an unnecessary detail here. What difference does it make?

>He backed away and back//

Watch the word repetition. And I have to say you've lost my sympathy for Chiselle here. Getting what she's earned is one thing, but shaking this guy down for an inflated price? Seems more like mafia than someone I'd care about.

>“Right, I’ll see you around,” the red mare finished.//

Missing line break.

>Chiselle sat down a small shaping tool//

Set/sat confusion.

>His cutie mark, two drumsticks//

Missing comma on the other side of the appositive.

>and put some of it in front of his young daughter along with a cup of coffee//

He already put the coffee in front of her…

>Say, have you found out what she does for a living yet.//

It's a question isn't it? And what's with the teaser line? What does it have to do with the story?

The mechanical issues are a mixed bag. The biggest consistent thing is comma problems, both in splices and with conjunctions. But the bigger things are stylistic.

You have a bad case of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. I won't rehash the explanation I referred you to of why this is a bad thing, but suffice it to say you're constantly bombarding me with information I already know, like her color, size, and race. Next is the sentence structures. You go through long stretches where almost every sentence starts with the subject, is about the same length, and has a similar inflection. That contributes to giving the prose a plodding feel. Finally, the whole story is very… factual. It focuses almost exclusively on relating event after event at the expense of communicating the emotions involved. If all I get is what happened, it reads like a history textbook. Including how the characters feel about those events is what makes it a story. But you have to be careful about it. I only saw a couple of places where you were being telly, but that's more a function of passing up most of the opportunities to give me emotional context than managing to avoid that particular pitfall. So before you go about adding all that in and end up doing it the wrong way, you should also read the section at the top of this thread on show versus tell.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chiselle loves her job as a sculptress and it provides her with some income.//</span><br />Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she cannot sustain herself on her art alone and often take on side jobs to make ends meet//</span><br />Subject/verb agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Will all of her dreams come true, or will she decide it&#039;s too much?//</span><br />Rhetorical questions are pretty cliched and unproductive in a synopsis.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>‘Who has time to brush their mane a hundred times, every day?’</i>//</span><br />Single quotes or italics. You don&#039;t need both.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pony//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure yet how much of a problem this is going to be, but you&#039;re skirting Lavender Unicorn Syndrome here. There&#039;s also a section up top about this. As LUS goes, this is an incredibly boring and generic descriptor to use. Pronouns and names are your friends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Who could that be? I don’t open up for another hour,”//</span><br />She could just as easily wonder this in the narration. Having characters talk to themselves in unrealistic ways is a quick method for hurting characterization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The unicorn opened the door to find a tall, tan-colored earth pony with dark red mane wearing a blue suit and hat.//</span><br />Okay, personal opinion time. This is not at all a reason for rejection. I know that the color schemes make physical appearance more interesting than it might be for a human character, and many readers in the fandom like seeing these descriptions for every new character, but I&#039;d urge you to consider whether any of it is really relevant. If there&#039;s something about his appearance that becomes important at some point or gives us some insight into his character, that&#039;s fine, but if I forget every one of these details, is it going to make any difference at all? Consider how often we get very basic descriptions of characters in mainstream /classic literature, or sometimes no description at all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;n’//</span><br />&#039;n&#039;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Drumstick//</span><br />Maybe you&#039;re saying something about his character by doing this. We&#039;ll see, but my first impression is that it&#039;s odd for him not to simply sign it &quot;Dad.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her mouth formed a huge grin as she happily skipped back into the kitchen//</span><br />The &quot;happily&quot; is a pretty telly word choice, but you don&#039;t even need it here. We already get her mood from the grin and the skipping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She placed the telegram onto the kitchen’s counter, suddenly she started giggling and skipped in place.//</span><br />Comma splice. And more skipping already? Unless you do something to acknowledge that it&#039;s repeated or use it in some thematic sense, this feels like an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The young girl enjoyed French toast and coffee as she read the morning paper.//</span><br />After being so happy, this paragraph describes nothing but a daily routine. She sure doesn&#039;t sound like she&#039;s any happier than normal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two section//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The final piece of the studio laid in a cabinet//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was wearing a safety vest and hard hat which complimented his gruff face.//</span><br />Compliment/complement confusion. Unless you mean his clothes had nice things to say…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hello Digger//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dad//</span><br />When using &quot;Dad&quot; in place of his name, capitalize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Welcome to Chip Off The Block!” Chiselle cheerfully sang to a white stallion that just entered. “Yes, yes, I’m here to place an order,” The earth pony replied in a haughty accent as he adjusted his purple bowtie//</span><br />You&#039;ve got two speakers in the same paragraph, a capitalization error for the dialogue tag on the second one, and you&#039;re missing the period at the end of the paragraph. And it&#039;s &quot;bow tie.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pegasus//</span><br />You aren&#039;t capitalizing the other races, so this would refer specifically to the Greek mythological figure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘til//</span><br />Smart quotes get leading apostrophes wrong. This one&#039;s backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chiselle looked away and blushed, “Well//</span><br />You can&#039;t just attach any action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the blocks marble//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The black mane unicorn//</span><br />black-maned<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one of the large block//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;till//</span><br />You spelled this as &#039;til earlier. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Good, I was wondering if you could cover the leading edge of the wings in gold foil.”//</span><br />This is the ninth straight paragraph of nothing but speech. There&#039;s also an entry on talking heads at the top of this thread that you should read.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;storefronts’//</span><br />Misplaced apostrophe. There&#039;s only one storefront.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;buttoned up shirt//</span><br />I wonder if you meant button-up?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;face. “Rut,”//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Pegasi sighed//</span><br />pegasus<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-Thank//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Th-thank.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her left green eye twitched//</span><br />&quot;Green&quot; is an unnecessary detail here. What difference does it make?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He backed away and back//</span><br />Watch the word repetition. And I have to say you&#039;ve lost my sympathy for Chiselle here. Getting what she&#039;s earned is one thing, but shaking this guy down for an inflated price? Seems more like mafia than someone I&#039;d care about.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Right, I’ll see you around,” the red mare finished.//</span><br />Missing line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chiselle sat down a small shaping tool//</span><br />Set/sat confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His cutie mark, two drumsticks//</span><br />Missing comma on the other side of the appositive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and put some of it in front of his young daughter along with a cup of coffee//</span><br />He already put the coffee in front of her…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Say, have you found out what she does for a living yet.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question isn&#039;t it? And what&#039;s with the teaser line? What does it have to do with the story?<br /><br />The mechanical issues are a mixed bag. The biggest consistent thing is comma problems, both in splices and with conjunctions. But the bigger things are stylistic.<br /><br />You have a bad case of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. I won&#039;t rehash the explanation I referred you to of why this is a bad thing, but suffice it to say you&#039;re constantly bombarding me with information I already know, like her color, size, and race. Next is the sentence structures. You go through long stretches where almost every sentence starts with the subject, is about the same length, and has a similar inflection. That contributes to giving the prose a plodding feel. Finally, the whole story is very… factual. It focuses almost exclusively on relating event after event at the expense of communicating the emotions involved. If all I get is what happened, it reads like a history textbook. Including how the characters feel about those events is what makes it a story. But you have to be careful about it. I only saw a couple of places where you were being telly, but that&#039;s more a function of passing up most of the opportunities to give me emotional context than managing to avoid that particular pitfall. So before you go about adding all that in and end up doing it the wrong way, you should also read the section at the top of this thread on show versus tell.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sun, Feb 16th, 2014 11:28</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 122

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She grit her teeth//

The only accepted past tense is "gritted."

>The pink pony's sharp voice soon rang out again, shattering the hapless unicorn's hopes of having found some peace and quiet at last.//

Watch the Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There's an explanation of the rationale behind avoiding it at the top of this thread. Suffice it to say you only have two characters, so you don't need to resort to such things to keep them straight.

>Her joints burned as her limbs strained against the metal handle, moving it up and down constantly, thus generating their cart's laughable propulsion on the tracks.//

This is just… odd. "Laughable" propulsion? I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean. And this whole paragraph comes across as rather sterile. I'm getting a very factual account of what happens to Rarity, but not much of how she feels about it.

>The moment the cart came to a full stop, the fashionista collapsed onto the metal handle, panting heavily.//

I've noticed you do this with quite a few of your participles already. These phrases like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start the clause. By default, "panting heavily" wants to describe "handle," because of their proximity. I can figure out what you meant to say, but there's still a little speed bump. And if you're not careful with these, you'll eventually write something that's ambiguous or outright misleading.

>They would have to spend the night out here.//

You blast through these first two scenes rather quickly. In conjunction with my previous comment about needing to see more emotion from the character, there's not that much right here about how uncomfortable she is. Make me feel it with her, I'll be that much more sympathetic with her.

>almost pitch black due to the lack of any lighting//

That's pretty redundant. Isn't that normally the default cause of pitch blackness?

>"Pinkie!" she cried, "Darling, what on Earth are you doing?"//

Dialogue punctuation/capitalization. There's a section at the top of the thread for this, too. And don't capitalize "earth" in this context. It means our planet. For that matter most fanfic writers use something like "what in Equestria."

>She did a couple of flips in the air and landed perfectly on all four of her hooves, then spun around to face her friend, beaming proudly.//

And it's happened. Who's beaming proudly? It's completely ambiguous. Grammatically, speaking, Rarity is, but you seem to be going for Pinkie.

>While she was busy rubbing her eyes, the hyperactive filly//

This is also ambiguous. It sounds like Pinkie's rubbing her eyes, but I bet you mean Rarity.

>She could laugh at, and even//

Unnecessary comma.

>"Oh, for Celestia's sake, Pinkie Pie! If you insist on letting your hair down, at least wait until we get out of all this dust! Besides, straight hair isn't exactly in right now. If you'd just listen to me for once, you could–"

Thoughts are indicated either by your choice of dialogue tag or italics (or in some circles, use of singles quotes). If you're italicizing them, don't use the quotes.

>In the faint illumination, she could just barely make out the silhouette of her friend resting on her side//

Odd to mention this detail now, since she had no apparent difficulty in seeing that Pinkie's mane had gone straight.

>lay her head back down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Her eyes widened at that.//

You've done this a few times, too. When you use "this" or "that" to refer to a broad swath of narration, it's awfully self-aware of the story. You could rephrase this or narrow the scope of the antecedent by just sticking an appropriate noun after it.

>"When was the last time that you did?"//

You're on the edge of being talking heads here. Any action in between the speech is minimal. I have a section on that up top as well.

>thud//

It's a valid word. Just use it normally. Don't put sounds effects in narration.

>my folks faces//

Missing apostrophe.

>She was about to try calming her down when the unicorn suddenly collapsed onto the dirt, her whole body shaking as she sobbed uncontrollably.//

This is really over the top. If you want to get across intense emotions, less is often more. If you go too melodramatic, you lose the feeling of authenticity that's key to a sad story.

>ruined makeup//

So the long, sweaty day and the partial night of sleeping on the ground hadn't done that already?

>messed up//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors.

>She trailed off//

It's not necessary to tell me this when I can already see it from the punctuation.

>hum the chords//

How does one hum a chord?

>Dumb rock!//

Textual effects like this aren't usually a good idea. There's not really an artistic effect here—it's more a lazy way to avoid describing how she says it.

>Her mane and tail have inflated back to their usual poofiness//

Why the switch to present tense?

>"Tell me, now where will you go?

>How long should you be alone?
>Can't you see the brightness of our lives?
>Look up and reach for the sky!"//
These are pretty disjoint thoughts to be forming a coherent song. Really, this puts me in the mind of something from anime.

The only consistent mechanical thing I saw was punctuation and capitalization of thoughts and dialogue. Stylistically, you were pushing it on the talking heads and Lavender Unicorn Syndrome quite a bit.

Watch the "to be" verbs as well. They're inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. Of the easier-to-find forms, you had 103, which is just a little shy of one every 3 sentences or so. That's not horrible, but you should probably concentrate a little more on choosing active verbs.

You got better once you made it into the main conflict of the story, but at least for Rarity, what really puts her in a tough place to start with is that she's making agonizingly little progress through a harsh environment. Yet that opening part of the story was very short on emotion. I need to see her getting desperate, frustrated, overwhelmed, and what have you. That's what sets up everything that follows. And as for what follows… dial it back a bit. You're making a little too much of an obvious grab for the heartstrings.

While I thought your reasoning through how Rarity would have the least to offer in this situation of all of them, I do have to say that this is a pretty common setup for stories we see: one character has an existential crisis, another comforts her and (sometimes) reveals a crisis of her own, and they both have a rather rapid and dramatic reversal of attitude. You have to do something to make your story stand out from the crowd, and while general quality of writing can to some degree, an original angle would really help you in this regard. Getting at the emotion behind it would, too, since it'd flesh out the character motivations. Rarity's part, for instance is rather spurred by very recent events to have such a deep-seated importance to her. Has she ever had these feelings of inadequacy before? Is this really a spur-of-the-moment thing, or has it been brewing for some time? And why are things just now coming to a head for Pinkie? She's been keeping this a secret… but doesn't make much of an effort to hide it from Rarity. She's upset about Applejack breaking a Pinkie Promise… but not Twilight. Why has she never brought it up with her friends before? These aren't the angles you have to take—I'm just brainstorming a bit here to get you thinking about what you can do to distinguish your story from the masses.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She grit her teeth//</span><br />The only accepted past tense is &quot;gritted.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pink pony&#039;s sharp voice soon rang out again, shattering the hapless unicorn&#039;s hopes of having found some peace and quiet at last.//</span><br />Watch the Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There&#039;s an explanation of the rationale behind avoiding it at the top of this thread. Suffice it to say you only have two characters, so you don&#039;t need to resort to such things to keep them straight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her joints burned as her limbs strained against the metal handle, moving it up and down constantly, thus generating their cart&#039;s laughable propulsion on the tracks.//</span><br />This is just… odd. &quot;Laughable&quot; propulsion? I&#039;m not sure what that&#039;s supposed to mean. And this whole paragraph comes across as rather sterile. I&#039;m getting a very factual account of what happens to Rarity, but not much of how she feels about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The moment the cart came to a full stop, the fashionista collapsed onto the metal handle, panting heavily.//</span><br />I&#039;ve noticed you do this with quite a few of your participles already. These phrases like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start the clause. By default, &quot;panting heavily&quot; wants to describe &quot;handle,&quot; because of their proximity. I can figure out what you meant to say, but there&#039;s still a little speed bump. And if you&#039;re not careful with these, you&#039;ll eventually write something that&#039;s ambiguous or outright misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They would have to spend the night out here.//</span><br />You blast through these first two scenes rather quickly. In conjunction with my previous comment about needing to see more emotion from the character, there&#039;s not that much right here about how uncomfortable she is. Make me feel it with her, I&#039;ll be that much more sympathetic with her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;almost pitch black due to the lack of any lighting//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty redundant. Isn&#039;t that normally the default cause of pitch blackness?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Pinkie!&quot; she cried, &quot;Darling, what on Earth are you doing?&quot;//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation/capitalization. There&#039;s a section at the top of the thread for this, too. And don&#039;t capitalize &quot;earth&quot; in this context. It means our planet. For that matter most fanfic writers use something like &quot;what in Equestria.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She did a couple of flips in the air and landed perfectly on all four of her hooves, then spun around to face her friend, beaming proudly.//</span><br />And it&#039;s happened. Who&#039;s beaming proudly? It&#039;s completely ambiguous. Grammatically, speaking, Rarity is, but you seem to be going for Pinkie.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;While she was busy rubbing her eyes, the hyperactive filly//</span><br />This is also ambiguous. It sounds like Pinkie&#039;s rubbing her eyes, but I bet you mean Rarity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could laugh at, and even//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>&quot;Oh, for Celestia&#039;s sake, Pinkie Pie! If you insist on letting your hair down, at least wait until we get out of all this dust! Besides, straight hair isn&#039;t exactly in right now. If you&#039;d just listen to me for once, you could–&quot;</i></span><br />Thoughts are indicated either by your choice of dialogue tag or italics (or in some circles, use of singles quotes). If you&#039;re italicizing them, don&#039;t use the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In the faint illumination, she could just barely make out the silhouette of her friend resting on her side//</span><br />Odd to mention this detail now, since she had no apparent difficulty in seeing that Pinkie&#039;s mane had gone straight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lay her head back down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes widened at that.//</span><br />You&#039;ve done this a few times, too. When you use &quot;this&quot; or &quot;that&quot; to refer to a broad swath of narration, it&#039;s awfully self-aware of the story. You could rephrase this or narrow the scope of the antecedent by just sticking an appropriate noun after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;When was the last time that you did?&quot;//</span><br />You&#039;re on the edge of being talking heads here. Any action in between the speech is minimal. I have a section on that up top as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>thud</i>//</span><br />It&#039;s a valid word. Just use it normally. Don&#039;t put sounds effects in narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my folks faces//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was about to try calming her down when the unicorn suddenly collapsed onto the dirt, her whole body shaking as she sobbed uncontrollably.//</span><br />This is really over the top. If you want to get across intense emotions, less is often more. If you go too melodramatic, you lose the feeling of authenticity that&#039;s key to a sad story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ruined makeup//</span><br />So the long, sweaty day and the partial night of sleeping on the ground hadn&#039;t done that already?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;messed up//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trailed off//</span><br />It&#039;s not necessary to tell me this when I can already see it from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hum the chords//</span><br />How does one hum a chord?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dumb rock!//</span><br />Textual effects like this aren&#039;t usually a good idea. There&#039;s not really an artistic effect here—it&#039;s more a lazy way to avoid describing how she says it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her mane and tail have inflated back to their usual poofiness//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Tell me, now where will you go?</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How long should you be alone?</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Can&#039;t you see the brightness of our lives?</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look up and reach for the sky!&quot;//</span><br />These are pretty disjoint thoughts to be forming a coherent song. Really, this puts me in the mind of something from anime.<br /><br />The only consistent mechanical thing I saw was punctuation and capitalization of thoughts and dialogue. Stylistically, you were pushing it on the talking heads and Lavender Unicorn Syndrome quite a bit.<br /><br />Watch the &quot;to be&quot; verbs as well. They&#039;re inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. Of the easier-to-find forms, you had 103, which is just a little shy of one every 3 sentences or so. That&#039;s not horrible, but you should probably concentrate a little more on choosing active verbs.<br /><br />You got better once you made it into the main conflict of the story, but at least for Rarity, what really puts her in a tough place to start with is that she&#039;s making agonizingly little progress through a harsh environment. Yet that opening part of the story was very short on emotion. I need to see her getting desperate, frustrated, overwhelmed, and what have you. That&#039;s what sets up everything that follows. And as for what follows… dial it back a bit. You&#039;re making a little too much of an obvious grab for the heartstrings.<br /><br />While I thought your reasoning through how Rarity would have the least to offer in this situation of all of them, I do have to say that this is a pretty common setup for stories we see: one character has an existential crisis, another comforts her and (sometimes) reveals a crisis of her own, and they both have a rather rapid and dramatic reversal of attitude. You have to do something to make your story stand out from the crowd, and while general quality of writing can to some degree, an original angle would really help you in this regard. Getting at the emotion behind it would, too, since it&#039;d flesh out the character motivations. Rarity&#039;s part, for instance is rather spurred by very recent events to have such a deep-seated importance to her. Has she ever had these feelings of inadequacy before? Is this really a spur-of-the-moment thing, or has it been brewing for some time? And why are things just now coming to a head for Pinkie? She&#039;s been keeping this a secret… but doesn&#039;t make much of an effort to hide it from Rarity. She&#039;s upset about Applejack breaking a Pinkie Promise… but not Twilight. Why has she never brought it up with her friends before? These aren&#039;t the angles you have to take—I&#039;m just brainstorming a bit here to get you thinking about what you can do to distinguish your story from the masses.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 123

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The pony prisoner shivered, and coughed haggardly.//

Have a look at the information on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. Additionally, it's a little late to be adding in a detail like "haggardly." You've already given me a mental image of what this place looks like and what the character is doing, and now you're re-characterizing that. If you want her to look haggard, make that clear from the beginning.

>Ice coated the place, making the whole area colored in various shades of blue and grey//

Phrasing's a little off. Why not just "coloring the whole are in various shaded"? It's more direct and active that way.

>ice and crystal-encrusted//

Hyphenate the whole thing.

>Her heart filled with pure elation. For the first time in a long time, she felt joy.//

This has far less impact than it would if you got me to deduce from her appearance and actions how she felt. Have a look at the section on show versus tell, too.

>It’s ethereal mass//

It's/its confusion.

>The prisoner’s heart lurched.//

Scroll so that this line is at the bottom of your screen. Then look back up at the first word of each paragraph. I think you'll see a pattern. Unintentional patterns are a bad thing. Many intentional ones are too, but at least the author was thinking about them. You have to be conscious of your sentence structures so you don't get into a rut.

>As she crumpled to the ground, the ice creeped up her legs, threatening to engulf her.//

And along those lines, you also use quite a few participles, and besides being repetitive, they come with a few dangers of their own. A number of yours have been misplaced modifiers. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so grammatically speaking, her legs are threatening to engulf her. It's not hard to figure out what you meant here, but you have to be careful, or you'll eventually write something that's ambiguous or outright misleading. Also, it's "crept."

>Celestia grew even more worried//

More telling. Let me see what this looks like. If I figure it out, it's my conclusion, and you've gotten me invested in the story. If you tell me, it's a cold fact.

That song… I suppose lullabies can be very irregular, but this has no consistent rhythm. And what kind of lullaby has a phrase like "keep evil at bay"?

>When have our worst nightmares ever really come true?//

This is entirely immersion-breaking. You haven't had a narrator that will address the reader, so don't introduce one now. Rhetorical questions in an objective viewpoint are also a bad idea. For that matter, the perspective is wavering here. The opening scene was in Luna's head, but the second one had been in Celestia's viewpoint until the last couple paragraphs, which went to Luna for a brief stay before pulling back to omniscient. You should read the section on head hopping to see why changes in perspective have to be carefully considered.

>Pain was all she felt.//

What little emotional context I'm getting in this scene is telly. You're focusing on the physical sensations. How does she feel about this?

>The gleaming white unicorn horn of the princess was lit up in a glorious way.//

There isn't any need for the passive voice here. Keep it active. And when you use a word like "glorious," you have to be aware what you're saying. Celestia's your perspective character here, so this is her opinion. Why is she thinking that about her own horn, particularly when so much else is on her mind at the moment? Compare to your earlier description of the room as "beautiful." That's a more reasonable judgment for Celestia to be making, but this one isn't.

>revealing the horrible truth laying outside//

Lay/lie confusion.

>The magenta eyes of the princess//

This is an awkward indirect construct. You used another one earlier to describe her horn. Consider just saying "The princess's magenta eyes." It's much more direct and concise.

I have to say that all of these single-sentence and single-line paragraphs are starting to get grating. It's another effect, like using italics, for making things stand out, and when almost everything stands out, nothing does. And like italics, it gets annoying to read after a while.

>“No… please…” She said in a hushed tone//

Dialogue tag capitalization.

>She was helpless to stop herself from destroying all she loved.//

And like I commented last chapter, only two of the last eighteen paragraphs start with something other than "the" or "she."

>melting into liquid//

That's generally how it works.

>eachother//

Typo.

>The sisters proceeded to tell each other their painful accounts of the visions they had seen, frequently breaking down into tears.//

And this is really the emotional crux of the story: sisters sharing their pain with each other and comforting each other. And you blast through it all in four sentences. And it happens off-screen. I normally save something like this for wrap-up comments, but I'll go ahead and discuss it here. A story needs something to propel it forward. Most often, that's conflict, but character growth can work as well. For conflict, you'd need to define what it is that someone wants, what she's willing to do to get it, and what will happen if she doesn't. Then you resolve the conflict. For character growth, you'd need to reveal something surprising about a character or show her working her way through a difficult situation in a way that we learn something about her, preferably that she's changed as a result. Either way, it's about contrasting before and after. What changed as a result of these events? Presumably how these sisters relate to each other and appreciate each other now. But we don't get to see them as they go through this meeting of the minds or what new attitude they have afterward. I like the story's layout, where we get to see both sisters' visions, but this reads more like a series of scenes, not like a story that communicates some meaning with those scenes. Do you want this story to say something about their relationship, or do you just want to have these few scenes play through without an overall message?

>I have no idea, they couldn’t have wandered far//

Comma splice.

>standing up and hooking his front leg around Cadance’s neck, giving her a peck on the cheek//

It's awkward to chain two participial phrases together like this, and you're missing your end punctuation.

>Ach//

When did Cadence become German? Or Scottish?

>standing near the throne, The large crystal//

Typo.

>Celestia apologized with a smile//

First, the use of "apologized" is redundant with the fact that she explicitly said, "I'm sorry." Second, the majority of your speaking verbs here are unusual ones, which tends to call attention to the writing itself over the story. There's also a section up top about saidisms that explains the rationale.

>The crystal key to unveil it was broken//

Wouldn't it have been more effective to seal the trapdoor or destroy the magic door?

>It was good to have a sister.//

This at least begins to bring some meaning to the story, but it's awfully incomplete and understated to carry much significance. We can already assume she feels this way from her behavior at the end of the the show's second episode. So what's different about this time? There is some head hopping in this chapter, too—you begin in Cadence's head and move to Luna's for just the last few dozen words.

Against my normal format, I'll deal with the plot elements first, since I've already given you the long explanation there. The conflict/character growth is weak here.

On the stylistic front, a lot of the events the characters saw in the door were presented without much emotional context until near the end of each, and what was given was mostly telly. Surely these characters have reactions throughout the scenes they're witnessing. You also have some wandering perspectives. The overabundance of such things as very short paragraphs, participial phrases, and beginning sentence with the subject, particularly to open paragraphs, gets the writing in a rut at times. One recurring thing in particular was the number of "to be" verbs. Of the easiest forms to search, I counted 81. That's getting rather up there for this word count—it's a rate of one about every 2.5 sentences. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. I'd encourage you to choose more active verbs.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pony prisoner shivered, and coughed haggardly.//</span><br />Have a look at the information on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. Additionally, it&#039;s a little late to be adding in a detail like &quot;haggardly.&quot; You&#039;ve already given me a mental image of what this place looks like and what the character is doing, and now you&#039;re re-characterizing that. If you want her to look haggard, make that clear from the beginning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ice coated the place, making the whole area colored in various shades of blue and grey//</span><br />Phrasing&#039;s a little off. Why not just &quot;coloring the whole are in various shaded&quot;? It&#039;s more direct and active that way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ice and crystal-encrusted//</span><br />Hyphenate the whole thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her heart filled with pure elation. For the first time in a long time, she felt joy.//</span><br />This has far less impact than it would if you got me to deduce from her appearance and actions how she felt. Have a look at the section on show versus tell, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s ethereal mass//</span><br />It&#039;s/its confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The prisoner’s heart lurched.//</span><br />Scroll so that this line is at the bottom of your screen. Then look back up at the first word of each paragraph. I think you&#039;ll see a pattern. Unintentional patterns are a bad thing. Many intentional ones are too, but at least the author was thinking about them. You have to be conscious of your sentence structures so you don&#039;t get into a rut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she crumpled to the ground, the ice creeped up her legs, threatening to engulf her.//</span><br />And along those lines, you also use quite a few participles, and besides being repetitive, they come with a few dangers of their own. A number of yours have been misplaced modifiers. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so grammatically speaking, her legs are threatening to engulf her. It&#039;s not hard to figure out what you meant here, but you have to be careful, or you&#039;ll eventually write something that&#039;s ambiguous or outright misleading. Also, it&#039;s &quot;crept.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia grew even more worried//</span><br />More telling. Let me see what this looks like. If I figure it out, it&#039;s my conclusion, and you&#039;ve gotten me invested in the story. If you tell me, it&#039;s a cold fact.<br /><br />That song… I suppose lullabies can be very irregular, but this has no consistent rhythm. And what kind of lullaby has a phrase like &quot;keep evil at bay&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When have our worst nightmares ever really come true?//</span><br />This is entirely immersion-breaking. You haven&#039;t had a narrator that will address the reader, so don&#039;t introduce one now. Rhetorical questions in an objective viewpoint are also a bad idea. For that matter, the perspective is wavering here. The opening scene was in Luna&#039;s head, but the second one had been in Celestia&#039;s viewpoint until the last couple paragraphs, which went to Luna for a brief stay before pulling back to omniscient. You should read the section on head hopping to see why changes in perspective have to be carefully considered.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pain was all she felt.//</span><br />What little emotional context I&#039;m getting in this scene is telly. You&#039;re focusing on the physical sensations. How does she feel about this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The gleaming white unicorn horn of the princess was lit up in a glorious way.//</span><br />There isn&#039;t any need for the passive voice here. Keep it active. And when you use a word like &quot;glorious,&quot; you have to be aware what you&#039;re saying. Celestia&#039;s your perspective character here, so this is her opinion. Why is she thinking that about her own horn, particularly when so much else is on her mind at the moment? Compare to your earlier description of the room as &quot;beautiful.&quot; That&#039;s a more reasonable judgment for Celestia to be making, but this one isn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;revealing the horrible truth laying outside//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The magenta eyes of the princess//</span><br />This is an awkward indirect construct. You used another one earlier to describe her horn. Consider just saying &quot;The princess&#039;s magenta eyes.&quot; It&#039;s much more direct and concise.<br /><br />I have to say that all of these single-sentence and single-line paragraphs are starting to get grating. It&#039;s another effect, like using italics, for making things stand out, and when almost everything stands out, nothing does. And like italics, it gets annoying to read after a while.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“No… <i>please</i>…” She said in a hushed tone//</span><br />Dialogue tag capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was helpless to stop herself from destroying all she loved.//</span><br />And like I commented last chapter, only two of the last eighteen paragraphs start with something other than &quot;the&quot; or &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;melting into liquid//</span><br />That&#039;s generally how it works.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eachother//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sisters proceeded to tell each other their painful accounts of the visions they had seen, frequently breaking down into tears.//</span><br />And this is really the emotional crux of the story: sisters sharing their pain with each other and comforting each other. And you blast through it all in four sentences. And it happens off-screen. I normally save something like this for wrap-up comments, but I&#039;ll go ahead and discuss it here. A story needs something to propel it forward. Most often, that&#039;s conflict, but character growth can work as well. For conflict, you&#039;d need to define what it is that someone wants, what she&#039;s willing to do to get it, and what will happen if she doesn&#039;t. Then you resolve the conflict. For character growth, you&#039;d need to reveal something surprising about a character or show her working her way through a difficult situation in a way that we learn something about her, preferably that she&#039;s changed as a result. Either way, it&#039;s about contrasting before and after. What changed as a result of these events? Presumably how these sisters relate to each other and appreciate each other now. But we don&#039;t get to see them as they go through this meeting of the minds or what new attitude they have afterward. I like the story&#039;s layout, where we get to see both sisters&#039; visions, but this reads more like a series of scenes, not like a story that communicates some meaning with those scenes. Do you want this story to say something about their relationship, or do you just want to have these few scenes play through without an overall message?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have no idea, they couldn’t have wandered far//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;standing up and hooking his front leg around Cadance’s neck, giving her a peck on the cheek//</span><br />It&#039;s awkward to chain two participial phrases together like this, and you&#039;re missing your end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ach//</span><br />When did Cadence become German? Or Scottish?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;standing near the throne, The large crystal//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia apologized with a smile//</span><br />First, the use of &quot;apologized&quot; is redundant with the fact that she explicitly said, &quot;I&#039;m sorry.&quot; Second, the majority of your speaking verbs here are unusual ones, which tends to call attention to the writing itself over the story. There&#039;s also a section up top about saidisms that explains the rationale.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The crystal key to unveil it was broken//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t it have been more effective to seal the trapdoor or destroy the magic door?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was good to have a sister.//</span><br />This at least begins to bring some meaning to the story, but it&#039;s awfully incomplete and understated to carry much significance. We can already assume she feels this way from her behavior at the end of the the show&#039;s second episode. So what&#039;s different about this time? There is some head hopping in this chapter, too—you begin in Cadence&#039;s head and move to Luna&#039;s for just the last few dozen words.<br /><br />Against my normal format, I&#039;ll deal with the plot elements first, since I&#039;ve already given you the long explanation there. The conflict/character growth is weak here.<br /><br />On the stylistic front, a lot of the events the characters saw in the door were presented without much emotional context until near the end of each, and what was given was mostly telly. Surely these characters have reactions throughout the scenes they&#039;re witnessing. You also have some wandering perspectives. The overabundance of such things as very short paragraphs, participial phrases, and beginning sentence with the subject, particularly to open paragraphs, gets the writing in a rut at times. One recurring thing in particular was the number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Of the easiest forms to search, I counted 81. That&#039;s getting rather up there for this word count—it&#039;s a rate of one about every 2.5 sentences. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. I&#039;d encourage you to choose more active verbs.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 124

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She sat in the middle of her boutique//

I guess this is more a suggestion than an error, but since pronouns work by antecedent, it's usually a good idea to introduce the character more definitely in her first appearance, even if it's something generic like "the mare."

>the design was mesmerizing, the seams were strong, and the minimalistic use of gemstones added the perfect touch//

This illustrates a problem I'm already seeing. Contrast your three verb choices here: was, was, added. Which one do you think is more interesting? You have 8 "to be" verbs in your first 7 sentences. It's impractical to avoid that verb altogether, but it pays to choose active verbs where you can. That's especially important right here at the beginning, where you're trying to capture the reader's interest, but nothing much is happening here.

>audible sigh//

This is a far-overused phrase by inexperienced writers. It's also redundant filler. A sigh is audible by default. You'd only need to clarify if it wasn't.

>Impatience and excitement coursed through her veins//

You need to create a mental picture for these things. Show me what she does and how she looks in such a way that I deduce her impatience and excitement. That's how you get me invested in her character, how you get me to feel that with her instead of just knowing it as an abstract fact.

>Begrudgingly//

Have a look at the discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread. This is detached from the very mechanical actions that follow. Instead, use her actions to communicate the mood. How would I know she was begrudging if I was in the room watching her?

>someway//

Typo.

>Her friend//

You've already identified her as Fluttershy by this point, so it's really off-putting that you continue referring to her almost exclusively as "her friend."

>that she didn't even know she had//

This is another cliched phrase that inexperienced writers overuse.

>She now felt relaxed, rejuvenated and more than prepared to take on her task once again.//

Show me through how she acts.

>imagining the marvelous gradient gracefully complimenting the fabric//

Compliment/complement confusion. Unless the fabric is saying nice things.

>One week later.//

Surely you can find a more elegant way of working this into the narration. You don't need to wield it like a hammer.

>stiching//

Typo.

>stupid, little//

These are hierarchical adjectives. You don't need the comma.

>She'd many dresses before//

Missing word.

>bolts fabrics and spools of threads//

Missing word and inappropriate plurals.

>began to continue//

These are pretty contradictory.

>ensuring they were perfectly spaced out, yet close enough together to ensure//

Watch the close repetition of words or phrases.

>3//

Spell out numbers this short.

>Once again, a feeling in her gut reminded herself of her lies.//

Reflexive pronouns are used when the same person or thing is the subject.

>she managed to find her voice at this//

Using "this" or "that" to refer to the narration itself is a bad idea. Better to find an appropriate noun to put after it.

>sigh of defeat//

In addition to being telly, these are getting repetitive—you have quite a few of these "sigh of ____" phrasings.

>shuteye//

Shut-eye.

>the white ceiling had filled her vision and she found it most pleasant//

You've done this a few times. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>as it usually did. It usually went//

Repetitive.

There are some good artistic things going on here, and I appreciate how you ended it. But we'll get to the abstract stuff in a moment. First, the mechanical and stylistic things.

There's a decent amount of telling up front, which is one of the worst places to do that in a story, but it seems to improve toward the end. You use a number of cliches, and the declaration of time skips at the beginning of the last few scenes was rather clumsy. And I can't figure out why you persisted in calling Fluttershy "her friend." That's a very odd manifestation of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There was some repetition, but none more so than the plain old verb "to be." Of the few easiest forms to search for, I counted 121. That's immense for this word count, roughly one every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You really need to be choosing more active verbs.

So, to the plot itself… Well, this is obviously a character piece, so it'll live on character growth more than external conflict. You do have one small vehicle present for external conflict, and that's how Fluttershy and Sweetie Belle are being neglected. Yet they don't seem very troubled about it, so it's not played up as such, thus it doesn't trouble me, either. That leaves character growth, so what surprising thing do we learn about a character, how does a character address a challenging situation, and how does a character change as a result of the story's events? Well, there really isn't any of this, either. We already know Rarity's obsessive, so that in and of itself isn't shocking. She doesn't change through the story—she just keeps up this obsessive behavior. Now, a lack of change can be a watershed moment, too, as long as it's the character's choice to remain how she is as a response to a dilemma. But no such dilemma is presented. She just keeps on being the same Rarity she's been throughout the story. There are some other lesser-used methods for portraying character growth, but I won't get into them, since they don't apply here. Bottom line: this was a nice series of scenes, but I wouldn't call it a story. What message does it carry? How does it add to my understanding of a character? This can be a difficult problem to fix, but like I said, you already have a vehicle in place for doing so: Fluttershy and/or Sweetie Belle. If you'd care to delve into how all this is affecting them and what they do about it, then you'd have some real conflict. That's not the only avenue, of course, but give some thought to what you want a reader to take away beyond "Rarity acts like herself, only sometimes more intensely." I will say, though, that you have Rarity's voice down quite well.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sat in the middle of her boutique//</span><br />I guess this is more a suggestion than an error, but since pronouns work by antecedent, it&#039;s usually a good idea to introduce the character more definitely in her first appearance, even if it&#039;s something generic like &quot;the mare.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the design was mesmerizing, the seams were strong, and the minimalistic use of gemstones added the perfect touch//</span><br />This illustrates a problem I&#039;m already seeing. Contrast your three verb choices here: was, was, added. Which one do you think is more interesting? You have 8 &quot;to be&quot; verbs in your first 7 sentences. It&#039;s impractical to avoid that verb altogether, but it pays to choose active verbs where you can. That&#039;s especially important right here at the beginning, where you&#039;re trying to capture the reader&#039;s interest, but nothing much is happening here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;audible sigh//</span><br />This is a far-overused phrase by inexperienced writers. It&#039;s also redundant filler. A sigh is audible by default. You&#039;d only need to clarify if it wasn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Impatience and excitement coursed through her veins//</span><br />You need to create a mental picture for these things. Show me what she does and how she looks in such a way that I deduce her impatience and excitement. That&#039;s how you get me invested in her character, how you get me to feel that with her instead of just knowing it as an abstract fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Begrudgingly//</span><br />Have a look at the discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread. This is detached from the very mechanical actions that follow. Instead, use her actions to communicate the mood. How would I know she was begrudging if I was in the room watching her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;someway//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her friend//</span><br />You&#039;ve already identified her as Fluttershy by this point, so it&#039;s really off-putting that you continue referring to her almost exclusively as &quot;her friend.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that she didn&#039;t even know she had//</span><br />This is another cliched phrase that inexperienced writers overuse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She now felt relaxed, rejuvenated and more than prepared to take on her task once again.//</span><br />Show me through how she acts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;imagining the marvelous gradient gracefully complimenting the fabric//</span><br />Compliment/complement confusion. Unless the fabric is saying nice things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One week later.//</span><br />Surely you can find a more elegant way of working this into the narration. You don&#039;t need to wield it like a hammer.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stiching//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stupid, little//</span><br />These are hierarchical adjectives. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She&#039;d many dresses before//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bolts fabrics and spools of threads//</span><br />Missing word and inappropriate plurals.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;began to continue//</span><br />These are pretty contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ensuring they were perfectly spaced out, yet close enough together to ensure//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words or phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;3//</span><br />Spell out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once again, a feeling in her gut reminded herself of her lies.//</span><br />Reflexive pronouns are used when the same person or thing is the subject.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she managed to find her voice at this//</span><br />Using &quot;this&quot; or &quot;that&quot; to refer to the narration itself is a bad idea. Better to find an appropriate noun to put after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sigh of defeat//</span><br />In addition to being telly, these are getting repetitive—you have quite a few of these &quot;sigh of ____&quot; phrasings.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shuteye//</span><br />Shut-eye.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the white ceiling had filled her vision and she found it most pleasant//</span><br />You&#039;ve done this a few times. Look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as it usually did. It usually went//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br />There are some good artistic things going on here, and I appreciate how you ended it. But we&#039;ll get to the abstract stuff in a moment. First, the mechanical and stylistic things.<br /><br />There&#039;s a decent amount of telling up front, which is one of the worst places to do that in a story, but it seems to improve toward the end. You use a number of cliches, and the declaration of time skips at the beginning of the last few scenes was rather clumsy. And I can&#039;t figure out why you persisted in calling Fluttershy &quot;her friend.&quot; That&#039;s a very odd manifestation of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There was some repetition, but none more so than the plain old verb &quot;to be.&quot; Of the few easiest forms to search for, I counted 121. That&#039;s immense for this word count, roughly one every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You really need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />So, to the plot itself… Well, this is obviously a character piece, so it&#039;ll live on character growth more than external conflict. You do have one small vehicle present for external conflict, and that&#039;s how Fluttershy and Sweetie Belle are being neglected. Yet they don&#039;t seem very troubled about it, so it&#039;s not played up as such, thus it doesn&#039;t trouble me, either. That leaves character growth, so what surprising thing do we learn about a character, how does a character address a challenging situation, and how does a character change as a result of the story&#039;s events? Well, there really isn&#039;t any of this, either. We already know Rarity&#039;s obsessive, so that in and of itself isn&#039;t shocking. She doesn&#039;t change through the story—she just keeps up this obsessive behavior. Now, a lack of change can be a watershed moment, too, as long as it&#039;s the character&#039;s choice to remain how she is as a response to a dilemma. But no such dilemma is presented. She just keeps on being the same Rarity she&#039;s been throughout the story. There are some other lesser-used methods for portraying character growth, but I won&#039;t get into them, since they don&#039;t apply here. Bottom line: this was a nice series of scenes, but I wouldn&#039;t call it a story. What message does it carry? How does it add to my understanding of a character? This can be a difficult problem to fix, but like I said, you already have a vehicle in place for doing so: Fluttershy and/or Sweetie Belle. If you&#039;d care to delve into how all this is affecting them and what they do about it, then you&#039;d have some real conflict. That&#039;s not the only avenue, of course, but give some thought to what you want a reader to take away beyond &quot;Rarity acts like herself, only sometimes more intensely.&quot; I will say, though, that you have Rarity&#039;s voice down quite well.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 125

>>129746

Thank you for the feedback!

I won't argue with most of your observations regarding the technical issues. They seem valid, and since this story was a bit rushed and did not receive nearly enough editing, I will get right on to correcting them.

There are, however, a few points that I must insist on "defending":

1.) The reason the first few scenes are so "short" is because I felt that even the way they are now is a bit too drawn out, and adding any more would just be wasting the reader's time. However, if you believe it wouldn't hurt the story if I added a little more to that part, perhaps focusing on further immersing the reader in Rarity's misery, then I'll work something out…

2.) The "talking heads" thing. If it's okay, I would rather not add very much more than one line or two to offset the total absence of non-verbal details, again because I don't want to pad out the story too much.

3.) Why is Rarity's reaction "over the top"? Or, more importantly: why is "over the top" bad in her case? :D Based on how we've seen her in the show so far, it isn't exactly OOC for her. After all, we're talking about a notorious drama queen who is left stranded in the desert, and is about to be abandoned by her only companion – not to mention one of her best friends. Needless to say, she doesn't take it very well…

I guess that scene is meant to be cathartic somehow. If you think it ruins the mood, though, then I'll dial it back somewhat.

4.) Regarding the final verse of the song, I imagined that it is an incredibly obvious reference to how the Sonic Rainboom appeared on the sky for them at the lowest point in their lives. That, and, in the context of this story, this song was written as part of somepony's silly-filly dream of becoming a singer, so a couple of "cheesy" lines can be expected… ;)

5.) MY STORY IS UNORIGINAL??? T_T

Okay, okay, just kidding. But seriously: is it that much of a "we've seen all this before?" I'll admit that it's a fairly conventional "sadfic", but I didn't try to take any shortcuts by doing something like "somepony close to me has died" or whatever. This story tries to focus on things that are present in the show, but are never actually pointed out: Rarity is almost always the least "useful" member of the Mane Six during any crisis, usually being relegated to a "damsel in distress" (with the exception of the Diamond Dog episode). Pinkie Pie is the Element of Laughter, and she loves seeing ponies smile and making them smile, but whenever they face a more complex issue than what can be solved by singing and over-the-top partying, her efforts become ineffective at best, detrimental at worst.

Rarity's outburst is the culmination of insecurities that she has kept hidden deep within herself, deep enough that even she wasn't aware of them until her friend decided to abandon her, which she saw as the result of her own incompetence in providing consolation. Yes, it's a "spur of the moment" thing in the sense that her own crisis only comes to surface once she sees just how bad the situation has turned out despite her efforts (up to that point, Pinkie Pie didn't mention wanting to actually leave them). This is the reason why that scene is so "over the top." Again, I didn't want to make the description of it any lengthier because I feared it would just make things drag on, but I wanted to present as excessively as possible just how horrible that moment was for her. Perhaps the way I messed up is that it looks far too similar to her "whining scenes," and I don't point out well enough that she's not overacting this time.

As for Pinkie Pie, the story suggests that beneath her invincible joyful demeanor hides an equally insecure pony, who needed just one more experience of inadequacy to start falling apart. It suggests that she tries her hardest to convince everypony around her that she can be happy no matter what happens, something that she uses to lift their spirits as well, but in truth it's more of a peculiar form of denial. She acts the way she does to convince herself just as much as anypony else. This is the main difference between her and Rarity. Hers is a more passive form of denial.

When Twilight broke her Pinkie Promise, she didn't do it in front of anyone else, nor was it such a big issue compared to how Applejack was planning on running away from them. Also, faking a promise is, in a way, even worse than breaking one. Both are a betrayal of trust, but the former is outright deception, and that's what set Pinkie Pie off. It meant that Applejack had zero faith in her from the very beginning. In the context of this story, her anger once she realized that was only fraction of what she felt. It was at that point she became convinced that nopony would ever ask her to help with their problems, beyond maybe throwing a party or two…

All that said, are the aforementioned concepts unoriginal outright, or simply not presented well enough to make the story distinguishable from others of its kind?

Thank you in advance for your help and attention!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129746" onclick="return highlight('129746', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129746">&gt;&gt;129746</a><br /><br />Thank you for the feedback!<br /><br />I won&#039;t argue with most of your observations regarding the technical issues. They seem valid, and since this story was a bit rushed and did not receive nearly enough editing, I will get right on to correcting them. <br /><br />There are, however, a few points that I must insist on &quot;defending&quot;:<br /><br />1.) The reason the first few scenes are so &quot;short&quot; is because I felt that even the way they are now is a bit too drawn out, and adding any more would just be wasting the reader&#039;s time. However, if you believe it wouldn&#039;t hurt the story if I added a little more to that part, perhaps focusing on further immersing the reader in Rarity&#039;s misery, then I&#039;ll work something out…<br /><br />2.) The &quot;talking heads&quot; thing. If it&#039;s okay, I would rather not add very much more than one line or two to offset the total absence of non-verbal details, again because I don&#039;t want to pad out the story too much.<br /><br />3.) Why is Rarity&#039;s reaction &quot;over the top&quot;? Or, more importantly: why is &quot;over the top&quot; bad in her case? :D Based on how we&#039;ve seen her in the show so far, it isn&#039;t exactly OOC for her. After all, we&#039;re talking about a notorious drama queen who is left stranded in the desert, and is about to be abandoned by her only companion – not to mention one of her best friends. Needless to say, she doesn&#039;t take it very well…<br /><br />I guess that scene is meant to be cathartic somehow. If you think it ruins the mood, though, then I&#039;ll dial it back somewhat.<br /><br />4.) Regarding the final verse of the song, I imagined that it is an incredibly obvious reference to how the Sonic Rainboom appeared on the sky for them at the lowest point in their lives. That, and, in the context of this story, this song was written as part of somepony&#039;s silly-filly dream of becoming a singer, so a couple of &quot;cheesy&quot; lines can be expected… ;)<br /><br />5.) MY STORY IS UNORIGINAL??? T_T<br /><br />Okay, okay, just kidding. But seriously: is it that much of a &quot;we&#039;ve seen all this before?&quot; I&#039;ll admit that it&#039;s a fairly conventional &quot;sadfic&quot;, but I didn&#039;t try to take any shortcuts by doing something like &quot;somepony close to me has died&quot; or whatever. This story tries to focus on things that are present in the show, but are never actually pointed out: Rarity is almost always the least &quot;useful&quot; member of the Mane Six during any crisis, usually being relegated to a &quot;damsel in distress&quot; (with the exception of the Diamond Dog episode). Pinkie Pie is the Element of Laughter, and she loves seeing ponies smile and making them smile, but whenever they face a more complex issue than what can be solved by singing and over-the-top partying, her efforts become ineffective at best, detrimental at worst.<br /><br />Rarity&#039;s outburst is the culmination of insecurities that she has kept hidden deep within herself, deep enough that even she wasn&#039;t aware of them until her friend decided to abandon her, which she saw as the result of her own incompetence in providing consolation. Yes, it&#039;s a &quot;spur of the moment&quot; thing in the sense that her own crisis only comes to surface once she sees just how bad the situation has turned out despite her efforts (up to that point, Pinkie Pie didn&#039;t mention wanting to actually leave them). This is the reason why that scene is so &quot;over the top.&quot; Again, I didn&#039;t want to make the description of it any lengthier because I feared it would just make things drag on, but I wanted to present as excessively as possible just how horrible that moment was for her. Perhaps the way I messed up is that it looks far too similar to her &quot;whining scenes,&quot; and I don&#039;t point out well enough that she&#039;s not overacting this time.<br /><br />As for Pinkie Pie, the story suggests that beneath her invincible joyful demeanor hides an equally insecure pony, who needed just one more experience of inadequacy to start falling apart. It suggests that she tries her hardest to convince everypony around her that she can be happy no matter what happens, something that she uses to lift their spirits as well, but in truth it&#039;s more of a peculiar form of denial. She acts the way she does to convince herself just as much as anypony else. This is the main difference between her and Rarity. Hers is a more passive form of denial.<br /><br />When Twilight broke her Pinkie Promise, she didn&#039;t do it in front of anyone else, nor was it such a big issue compared to how Applejack was planning on running away from them. Also, faking a promise is, in a way, even worse than breaking one. Both are a betrayal of trust, but the former is outright deception, and that&#039;s what set Pinkie Pie off. It meant that Applejack had zero faith in her from the very beginning. In the context of this story, her anger once she realized that was only fraction of what she felt. It was at that point she became convinced that nopony would ever ask her to help with their problems, beyond maybe throwing a party or two…<br /><br />All that said, are the aforementioned concepts unoriginal outright, or simply not presented well enough to make the story distinguishable from others of its kind?<br /><br />Thank you in advance for your help and attention!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 126

>>129756
1) & 2) Don't mistake additional story for padding. Padding is useless verbiage that accomplishes nothing. Adding an emotional context to the opening scenes wouldn't be useless. It would lay the groundwork for why their tempers are running short and how Rarity in particular feels like she's not helping. In fact, even before considering their motivations for acting the way they do, adding emotional context is a good idea anyway. If you're not establishing their mindsets in those opening scenes, then what are they there for? Just to provide the setup? If so, I could already understand what's going on if you started the story where they camped for the night. That would render the early scenes useless and warrant cutting them completely. Make them mean something. For th talking heads, it doesn't take much. Just a little movement here and body language there to remind me these are live conversants.

3) Yes, Rarity goes over the top in canon, but they're in lighthearted comedic moments. Levity's out of place in a serious sad moment, so I can only assume you thought her exaggerated reaction was sad. If you're trying to be funny, I'd say it's causing some mood whiplash. If you're trying to be sad, it's too much. The key word here is authenticity. If you see a real person in pain, they'll more often try to control themselves than let themselves go completely. You're dealing with emotions in a more serious way than canon does, so it takes a more realistic approach.

4) You at least might want to go with a fixed rhythm, but it's a minor part of the story and not really a sticking point.

5) I've personally seen only 1 or 2 other stories that directly dealt with the aftermath of Pinkie and Rarity being left behind on the hoofcar. But in a more generic sense, we see a lot of these scenarios where two characters are alone somewhere and reveal feelings of inadequacy to each other. And of those, the question of whether they're a good enough friend is also a predominant theme. That doesn't preclude the possibility that a good story of that type might come along, but it takes more for one to distinguish itself from the rest. Yes, it's hard to find something that nobody else has done, but it's not so hard to find something that nobody else has done well.

My main issue with Pinkie is that she's awfully willing to talk about her insecurities with Rarity. I she had no problem talking about it, then why would she have done so earlier? She should have already learned her lesson in "Party of One" that if she lets her imagination run wild about others' attitudes toward her, then she'll draw the wrong conclusions.I'd think Rarity would have to do more to drag it out of her. But Rarity barely mentions it, and Pinkie immediately comes clean.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129756" onclick="return highlight('129756', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129756">&gt;&gt;129756</a><br />1) &amp; 2) Don&#039;t mistake additional story for padding. Padding is useless verbiage that accomplishes nothing. Adding an emotional context to the opening scenes wouldn&#039;t be useless. It would lay the groundwork for why their tempers are running short and how Rarity in particular feels like she&#039;s not helping. In fact, even before considering their motivations for acting the way they do, adding emotional context is a good idea anyway. If you&#039;re not establishing their mindsets in those opening scenes, then what are they there for? Just to provide the setup? If so, I could already understand what&#039;s going on if you started the story where they camped for the night. That would render the early scenes useless and warrant cutting them completely. Make them mean something. For th talking heads, it doesn&#039;t take much. Just a little movement here and body language there to remind me these are live conversants.<br /><br />3) Yes, Rarity goes over the top in canon, but they&#039;re in lighthearted comedic moments. Levity&#039;s out of place in a serious sad moment, so I can only assume you thought her exaggerated reaction was sad. If you&#039;re trying to be funny, I&#039;d say it&#039;s causing some mood whiplash. If you&#039;re trying to be sad, it&#039;s too much. The key word here is authenticity. If you see a real person in pain, they&#039;ll more often try to control themselves than let themselves go completely. You&#039;re dealing with emotions in a more serious way than canon does, so it takes a more realistic approach.<br /><br />4) You at least might want to go with a fixed rhythm, but it&#039;s a minor part of the story and not really a sticking point.<br /><br />5) I&#039;ve personally seen only 1 or 2 other stories that directly dealt with the aftermath of Pinkie and Rarity being left behind on the hoofcar. But in a more generic sense, we see a lot of these scenarios where two characters are alone somewhere and reveal feelings of inadequacy to each other. And of those, the question of whether they&#039;re a good enough friend is also a predominant theme. That doesn&#039;t preclude the possibility that a good story of that type might come along, but it takes more for one to distinguish itself from the rest. Yes, it&#039;s hard to find something that nobody else has done, but it&#039;s not so hard to find something that nobody else has done well.<br /><br />My main issue with Pinkie is that she&#039;s awfully willing to talk about her insecurities with Rarity. I she had no problem talking about it, then why would she have done so earlier? She should have already learned her lesson in &quot;Party of One&quot; that if she lets her imagination run wild about others&#039; attitudes toward her, then she&#039;ll draw the wrong conclusions.I&#039;d think Rarity would have to do more to drag it out of her. But Rarity barely mentions it, and Pinkie immediately comes clean.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 127

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>freshly-mopped//

In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are the exception to hyphenation.

>(that is, as high as the reclusive pegasus could comfortably manage)//

Minor gripe here, but parentheticals really only work when the narrator is quite intrusive, like when he addresses the reader directly or is a character himself. Fairy tales can also get away with it, since the narrator often takes on affectations in those as well. But if you're going to use a third-person narrator that's not deeply subjective, it feels out of place.

>farmer’s market//

You used "farmers' market" in the synopsis. Be consistent. The plural is more standard. You seem to use the singular throughout the story.

>; yet//

It's pretty redundant to use a conjunction after a semicolon. You might just want to use a period here.

>This time would be different, her resolute expression appeared to declare.//

Now, be very careful with your perspective. It appeared resolute to whom? The narrator? You haven't established him as someone there to witness it. To me? I don't know—you haven't described how this looks. To Fluttershy? Doubtful. Don't toss out judgments when we can't tell whose opinions they are.

>Her right leg carefully bandaged//

I've scanned ahead a bit and don't see how this happened. Did she return home to bandage it? Did she have one with her already and use it right there?

>Her right leg carefully bandaged, Fluttershy took a few tentative steps into the bustling market square, her yellow hooves making muted clacking sounds on the flagstone pavement.//

And back to this sentence. It can get clunky to have multiples of certain constructs in a sentence. You have <absolute phrase>, <main clause>, <absolute phrase>. And it makes the repetition stick out even more that both absolute phrases begin "her <body part>."

>Spotting the familiar face of the orange-maned mare at the carrot stand, she briefly glanced down at the ground, before reluctantly contorting her own face into an exaggerated grimace as she remembered her earlier resolution.//

You might want to break this into two sentences. There's a lot going on, and each action deserves more focus than all getting crammed together. Also note that participles imply concurrent action, so you're saying she spots Carrot Top (why don't you just go ahead and name her?) at the same time she looks at the ground, which doesn't quite make sense.

>whose resolve was somewhat stronger when it came to negotiating for the price of produce//

Kind of goes without saying, doesn't it? Anyone who's familiar with the episode you're playing off of will already know this.

>f-//

Please use a proper dash.

>Uh-oh//

What is this? You haven't been using a subjective viewpoint, and the narrator isn't a character. Did you mean for this to be Fluttershy's thought?

>with-//

Again, use a proper dash. What cuts her off, though? There's nothing in the narration. Is it Carrot Top's speech that does so? Then don't use the intervening narration. After a cutoff, the very next thing needs to be what interrupts, or else the narrator is contradicting the cutoff by having time to put something else in there.

>an appalled expression on his face//

It'll mean more if you let me see it. If I were standing there, what would I notice about how he looks and acts that would lead me to conclude he was appalled?

>The noise//

Missing a paragraph break.

>one by one//

Set this off with commas.

>as she discovered she had unwittingly become the center of attention again//

This is just repeating information you've already given me.

>>confused words to each other in the heat of the moment, before hundreds of ponies, spurred on by the insistent words//

Watch the repetition of phrasing here.

>appeared to be growing more and more agitated//

How so? You might want to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>he crowd of ponies, who had gone from generally indifferent to mildly displeased to vaguely enraged in a matter of seconds//

I haven't seen enraged yet, and you're talking about it as if it's already happened.

>all at once feeling shocked and guilty and frightened//

Yeah, this is getting quite telly.

>Hiding under an upturned apple cart, tears began to form in her eyes//

You have a classic dangling participle here. "Hiding…" is trying to describe Fluttershy, but she never appears in the clause. This says her tears are hiding.

I'm noticing that you use a lot of "as" clauses, particularly here at the end of the chapter. There are 6 of them in the last three long paragraphs alone, plus two other uses of the word in different senses. Repetition like that gets your writing in a rut and draws attention away from the story. You're also pretty reliant of participial phrases. Just be aware of your tendencies so you can try to avoid them.

>innocent fruits and vegetables crushed and trampled underhoof among the casualties of the coming storm//

And yet you're not going to mention the poor lemon merchant? He likely wasn't the only one, either, which is pretty grim. I mean, there's funny, but that was downright violent.

>marketgoers//

You hyphenated this term in the previous chapter.

>unpleasantries – and carrots – that//

Such is the danger of using a double hyphen in place of a dash: on my browser, there's a line break between the hyphens of the first pair.

>perhaps that was the right thing to do. Her heart sank at this thought.//

You're kind of giving me perspective whiplash here. The first part is fairly subjective, but the following is pretty suddenly objective, particularly in that the word choice of "this thought" really places the sentence as external to her.

>day off that day//

Repetitive

>they all currently occupied the local donut shop on the exact opposite side of town//

Surely it wouldn't take long for a pegasus to zip over there and tell them…

>work – after//

Spacing

>fruit-stand-wall//

That last hyphen shouldn't be there.

>originally conceived the idea to construct the barrier in the first place//

"Originally" and "in the first place" are redundant here.

>She shrunk back a few inches upon spotting the edge of the barricade frontier constructed by the other rioters, observing their indignant expressions and industrious attitude.//

Another danger with the number of participles you use: they are commonly misplaced modifiers. By proximity, "observing…" seems to describes the rioters, but that's not what you mean, and it kicks me out of the story when I have to stop and figure that out.

>who was wearing a pumpkin shell as a helmet which slightly impeded his vision//

You really have the habit of cramming an awful lot into sentences. Besides causing them to lose focus, it also makes for extended asides like this one, which doesn't provide any vital information and serve more as stumbling blocks. This one's badly in need of some commas, too. Case in point: If you look over this sentence, it contains no less than four separate "which" clauses.

>and flew around the plaza assigning duties to the assembled ponies, forming haphazard ranks out of the ragtag band of rebels//

And like the time I noted your multiple absolute phrases in a sentence, here you have participles in series, which also adds to confusion as to what they describe. Are they nested? I.e., who's forming ranks, the pegasi or the assembled ponies?

>Mr. What’s-his-name//

All those words would be capitalized.

>began approaching her//

Besides just being a weak and overused action in general, this is the second "begin" in this paragraph.

>miss//

Since he's trying to use that as part of her name, capitalize it.

One further note on repeated words: do a Ctrl-f for "was." You didn't use it too awfully much, but you use it in clusters at times, where it gets locally repetitive.

Well, the biggest definitive problems I can cite are the telly language at some inappropriate times, the very burdensome and over-long sentences that pop up frequently, and the repetitive structures of so many participles and "as" clauses, along with their attendant problems of ambiguity and synchronization.

In the humor department, it certainly had its moments. The "don't trot on me" was a nice touch. But I can't help feeling like you keep beating the same few gags over and over again. That Fluttershy's afraid to come out, that Ace is mentally reviewing his manifesto, and repeated scenes of ponies building up barricades and tearing apart stalls. Each one was funny at first, but then just dragged on past its welcome, only to show up again. Now, humor is definitely a subjective thing, and I didn't find this stupid—it's possible it just doesn't mesh with my sense of humor and readers would find it very funny. As such, if you care to resubmit, I'll have someone else judge it to get a different set of eyes, but I'd encourage you to consider the sheer number of recycled jokes. You might also want to have another chapter or two done, or maybe link a brief outline, so we can tell where the story might be going.

I can accept some level of comic absurdity, too, but it feels like a stretch that this is really the thing that'll set off Ace. And as to the specific infraction he saw, he hasn't caught anyone else doing it, yet he's going to ascribe this behavior to every seller in the market and, by extension, the government? It's a little hard to get behind his reasoning, and it'd help if he had a motivation that I could understand and maybe even sympathize with.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;freshly-mopped//</span><br />In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are the exception to hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(that is, as high as the reclusive pegasus could comfortably manage)//</span><br />Minor gripe here, but parentheticals really only work when the narrator is quite intrusive, like when he addresses the reader directly or is a character himself. Fairy tales can also get away with it, since the narrator often takes on affectations in those as well. But if you&#039;re going to use a third-person narrator that&#039;s not deeply subjective, it feels out of place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;farmer’s market//</span><br />You used &quot;farmers&#039; market&quot; in the synopsis. Be consistent. The plural is more standard. You seem to use the singular throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;; yet//</span><br />It&#039;s pretty redundant to use a conjunction after a semicolon. You might just want to use a period here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This time would be different, her resolute expression appeared to declare.//</span><br />Now, be very careful with your perspective. It appeared resolute to whom? The narrator? You haven&#039;t established him as someone there to witness it. To me? I don&#039;t know—you haven&#039;t described how this looks. To Fluttershy? Doubtful. Don&#039;t toss out judgments when we can&#039;t tell whose opinions they are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her right leg carefully bandaged//</span><br />I&#039;ve scanned ahead a bit and don&#039;t see how this happened. Did she return home to bandage it? Did she have one with her already and use it right there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her right leg carefully bandaged, Fluttershy took a few tentative steps into the bustling market square, her yellow hooves making muted clacking sounds on the flagstone pavement.//</span><br />And back to this sentence. It can get clunky to have multiples of certain constructs in a sentence. You have &lt;absolute phrase&gt;, &lt;main clause&gt;, &lt;absolute phrase&gt;. And it makes the repetition stick out even more that both absolute phrases begin &quot;her &lt;body part&gt;.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spotting the familiar face of the orange-maned mare at the carrot stand, she briefly glanced down at the ground, before reluctantly contorting her own face into an exaggerated grimace as she remembered her earlier resolution.//</span><br />You might want to break this into two sentences. There&#039;s a lot going on, and each action deserves more focus than all getting crammed together. Also note that participles imply concurrent action, so you&#039;re saying she spots Carrot Top (why don&#039;t you just go ahead and name her?) at the same time she looks at the ground, which doesn&#039;t quite make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whose resolve was somewhat stronger when it came to negotiating for the price of produce//</span><br />Kind of goes without saying, doesn&#039;t it? Anyone who&#039;s familiar with the episode you&#039;re playing off of will already know this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;f-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Uh-oh//</span><br />What is this? You haven&#039;t been using a subjective viewpoint, and the narrator isn&#039;t a character. Did you mean for this to be Fluttershy&#039;s thought?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with-//</span><br />Again, use a proper dash. What cuts her off, though? There&#039;s nothing in the narration. Is it Carrot Top&#039;s speech that does so? Then don&#039;t use the intervening narration. After a cutoff, the very next thing needs to be what interrupts, or else the narrator is contradicting the cutoff by having time to put something else in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an appalled expression on his face//</span><br />It&#039;ll mean more if you let me see it. If I were standing there, what would I notice about how he looks and acts that would lead me to conclude he was appalled?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The noise//</span><br />Missing a paragraph break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one by one//</span><br />Set this off with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she discovered she had unwittingly become the center of attention again//</span><br />This is just repeating information you&#039;ve already given me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt;confused words to each other in the heat of the moment, before hundreds of ponies, spurred on by the insistent words//</span><br />Watch the repetition of phrasing here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;appeared to be growing more and more agitated//</span><br />How so? You might want to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he crowd of ponies, who had gone from generally indifferent to mildly displeased to vaguely enraged in a matter of seconds//</span><br />I haven&#039;t seen enraged yet, and you&#039;re talking about it as if it&#039;s already happened.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all at once feeling shocked and guilty and frightened//</span><br />Yeah, this is getting quite telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hiding under an upturned apple cart, tears began to form in her eyes//</span><br />You have a classic dangling participle here. &quot;Hiding…&quot; is trying to describe Fluttershy, but she never appears in the clause. This says her tears are hiding.<br /><br />I&#039;m noticing that you use a lot of &quot;as&quot; clauses, particularly here at the end of the chapter. There are 6 of them in the last three long paragraphs alone, plus two other uses of the word in different senses. Repetition like that gets your writing in a rut and draws attention away from the story. You&#039;re also pretty reliant of participial phrases. Just be aware of your tendencies so you can try to avoid them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;innocent fruits and vegetables crushed and trampled underhoof among the casualties of the coming storm//</span><br />And yet you&#039;re not going to mention the poor lemon merchant? He likely wasn&#039;t the only one, either, which is pretty grim. I mean, there&#039;s funny, but that was downright violent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;marketgoers//</span><br />You hyphenated this term in the previous chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unpleasantries – and carrots – that//</span><br />Such is the danger of using a double hyphen in place of a dash: on my browser, there&#039;s a line break between the hyphens of the first pair.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;perhaps that was the right thing to do. Her heart sank at this thought.//</span><br />You&#039;re kind of giving me perspective whiplash here. The first part is fairly subjective, but the following is pretty suddenly objective, particularly in that the word choice of &quot;this thought&quot; really places the sentence as external to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;day off that day//</span><br />Repetitive<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they all currently occupied the local donut shop on the exact opposite side of town//</span><br />Surely it wouldn&#039;t take long for a pegasus to zip over there and tell them…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;work – after//</span><br />Spacing<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fruit-stand-wall//</span><br />That last hyphen shouldn&#039;t be there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;originally conceived the idea to construct the barrier in the first place//</span><br />&quot;Originally&quot; and &quot;in the first place&quot; are redundant here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She shrunk back a few inches upon spotting the edge of the barricade frontier constructed by the other rioters, observing their indignant expressions and industrious attitude.//</span><br />Another danger with the number of participles you use: they are commonly misplaced modifiers. By proximity, &quot;observing…&quot; seems to describes the rioters, but that&#039;s not what you mean, and it kicks me out of the story when I have to stop and figure that out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who was wearing a pumpkin shell as a helmet which slightly impeded his vision//</span><br />You really have the habit of cramming an awful lot into sentences. Besides causing them to lose focus, it also makes for extended asides like this one, which doesn&#039;t provide any vital information and serve more as stumbling blocks. This one&#039;s badly in need of some commas, too. Case in point: If you look over this sentence, it contains no less than four separate &quot;which&quot; clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and flew around the plaza assigning duties to the assembled ponies, forming haphazard ranks out of the ragtag band of rebels//</span><br />And like the time I noted your multiple absolute phrases in a sentence, here you have participles in series, which also adds to confusion as to what they describe. Are they nested? I.e., who&#039;s forming ranks, the pegasi or the assembled ponies?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mr. What’s-his-name//</span><br />All those words would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;began approaching her//</span><br />Besides just being a weak and overused action in general, this is the second &quot;begin&quot; in this paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;miss//</span><br />Since he&#039;s trying to use that as part of her name, capitalize it.<br /><br />One further note on repeated words: do a Ctrl-f for &quot;was.&quot; You didn&#039;t use it too awfully much, but you use it in clusters at times, where it gets locally repetitive.<br /><br />Well, the biggest definitive problems I can cite are the telly language at some inappropriate times, the very burdensome and over-long sentences that pop up frequently, and the repetitive structures of so many participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses, along with their attendant problems of ambiguity and synchronization.<br /><br />In the humor department, it certainly had its moments. The &quot;don&#039;t trot on me&quot; was a nice touch. But I can&#039;t help feeling like you keep beating the same few gags over and over again. That Fluttershy&#039;s afraid to come out, that Ace is mentally reviewing his manifesto, and repeated scenes of ponies building up barricades and tearing apart stalls. Each one was funny at first, but then just dragged on past its welcome, only to show up again. Now, humor is definitely a subjective thing, and I didn&#039;t find this stupid—it&#039;s possible it just doesn&#039;t mesh with my sense of humor and readers would find it very funny. As such, if you care to resubmit, I&#039;ll have someone else judge it to get a different set of eyes, but I&#039;d encourage you to consider the sheer number of recycled jokes. You might also want to have another chapter or two done, or maybe link a brief outline, so we can tell where the story might be going.<br /><br />I can accept some level of comic absurdity, too, but it feels like a stretch that this is really the thing that&#039;ll set off Ace. And as to the specific infraction he saw, he hasn&#039;t caught anyone else doing it, yet he&#039;s going to ascribe this behavior to every seller in the market and, by extension, the government? It&#039;s a little hard to get behind his reasoning, and it&#039;d help if he had a motivation that I could understand and maybe even sympathize with.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 128

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Distraught and humiliated, she slammed her Manehattanite apartment door, making it undeniably clear that she wished to be left alone.//

This is pretty telly language, which isn't a good idea right at the beginning of the story, where you want to grab the reader's interest and connect him to the character. Take a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Yet,//

It's not often that commas after conjunctions are correctly used. This one is not.

>Bang! Bang! Bang!//

Sound effects in narration are a bad idea. Better to describe the sound. It's also preferred to use italics and description to communicate emphasis and intensity. Bold and all caps aren't.

>The now-aggravated mare//

More telling. I have nothing to go on but your word to understand her mood, so it's pretty cold and distant.

>the sooner see what they want//

Missing word.

>She plastering her fake, signature business-smile on her face//

Verb form.

>T-Take this.//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a proper noun.

>that’s nice to hear but I still have no idea what it entails//

Also see the section on coma use with conjunctions.

>he trailed off as his pupils shrank, inhaling and exhaling as he tried to calm himself.//

You don't need to tell me he's trailing off, since I can already tell from the punctuation. Beware what's implied when you use participles, too. For one, they're commonly misplaced modifiers. By proximity, you're saying his pupils inhaled and exhaled. I can sort it out with a bit of logic, but if you're not careful, you'll write something that's ambiguous or misleading. The other problem is that both participles and "as" clauses synchronize actions, and it's unlikely you meant his pupils shrank at the same time he tried to calm himself. It probably happened in series, not parallel, as they imply opposite moods. Finally, what's special about the "inhaling and exhaling"? They're not elaborated on at all, so I don't know how it's different from default breathing, which of course he'd have to do to live.

>His composure slipped a little//

How so? Let me see it.

>It appears that Stargazer has become… unstable because of it.//

This is a common mistake people make in writing letters in fanfiction. Who would actually put the ellipsis in there. I get tha it's a dramatic pause, but that's a speech affectation. What reason would she have for putting a dramatic pause in the letter, when it's meant to be purely informative. It just doesn't come across as authentic.//

>Elements//

You didn't capitalize this earlier in Stargazer's speech. Be consistent.

>absent-mindedly//

absentmindedly

>She quickly averted her gaze from the book as unbidden thoughts of Stargazer's condition resurfaced.//

And she's sweeping aside his concerns very quickly. As much as he was afraid of it, wouldn't it take more consideration for her to think of using it?

>Like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, the book had lured in a new puppet to play with, using her very mind to lead her into its jaws. As the sun set and the shadows grew longer, a sinister grin spread across the unicorn’s face.//

You've been keeping a narration in Rarity's perspective so far, so it's a bit odd to have the narrator pull back to an omniscient point of view here for just the last few sentences of the scene. There are times that such a thing works, especially if you're creating a storybook feel by doing this and the beginning and ending of scenes, but you didn't start the story that way, so it just feels out of place.

>Rarity stood with another unicorn fashionista//

Given that Rarity's trying to rewrite something that happened to her, why is this scene shown from someone else's perspective?

>he made himself//

This is rendered in the same tense as when he trotted on stage, but he's presumably not still up there making it. So you need past perfect tense to show a completed action in the story's past: had made.

>Hoster was his name; famous for creating the first fashion convention in Manehattan.//

Misused semicolon. There isn't an independent clause anywhere after it.

>silencing the accursed sound. Moments after the silence//

Watch the close repetition of words.

>Him.//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

>And you, trying to destroy me?” it chuckled, “do you really think he didn’t already try that himself?”//

It already chuckled earlier in the paragraph. And the comma after "chuckled" is trying to make the two parts of the quote a single sentence, but you can't do that since you already had end punctuation on the first part.

>desperate//

If it was that desperate, why did it take them two days to get there?

>The walls//

Missing a line break.

>Twilight, why didn’t you do something about that moron? He was totally unprofessional!//

Do what? What sway does Twilight have over hotel employees?

>“Twilight—”//

There's a lot of dialogue around here that's unattributed, and when some of it doesn't even have a character action with it, it gets difficult to tell who's speaking.

>side-effect//

That term doesn't use a hyphen.

>Corruption.//

Wait. How does she know this? It didn't say so in Rarity's letter, so did she send another one later? And if so, she knew a lot more about what she was doing when she used the book, which seriously mars her innocence. If not, then Twilight must have researched the book, but you don't mention her doing that, and Rarity told her very little to go on. How did she manage to figure it out? And when Rarity wrote that letter, she was awfully convinced of the book's danger to claim ignorance when she gave into temptation.

>A stallion in a black suit complimented Rarity on her dress.//

Well, yes, this rehashes what he said. That's unnecessary.

>Make yourself at home; my butler will retrieve anything you require.//

Comma splice. And nobody;s surprised o see her well-dressed and with a butler in a run-down hotel?

>“Fight it! You can do it!//

Missing quotation marks.

>encasing Rarity’s form//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with commas.

>the enraged alabaster unicorn turned to face Twilight, eyes blazing green

You're touching on some Lavender Unicorn Syndrome here. There's a section on this up top, too. And I know from reading, but grammatically, it's ambiguous whose eyes are blazing green.

>That night…//

There are more elegant ways of working this into the narration than stating it outright like stage directions.

>marvelous//

You spelled this "marvellous" earlier. Is that a British spelling?

>Rarity’s sprang up from her bed and scream.//

Verb form.

>laying back down on her bed//

Lay/lie confusion.

>The end?//

Please don't do this.

This story's not bad, but the ending took an ending I didn't expect, more because I was expecting the unexpected. If that's too confusing, basically this ending was easy to see coming.

Mechanically speaking, the main issues were with commas and sound effects, but there was a smattering of other things. Nothing too serious. As to style, there was a lot of telly language here. It can be a difficult thing to wrap your mind around, but it helps to think as if you were a character yourself. Put yourself there as an observer. What would you notice about each character to deduce how they felt? Give me the same evidence. That's probably the biggest issue with the story.

The plot was fine, but seemed to move too fast. Rarity takes a scene to become familiar with the book and what it can do, but then she quite rapidly falls under its control. If she really believes that it's dangerous, surely she'd have more of an internal conflict over whether to use it. There's also a bit of a disconnect in how Rarity and Stargazer act under the book's influence. Stargazer was fully aware of what it had done, and was presumably okay with the trade-off until fairly recently. But Rarity seems pretty oblivious and shows no such resistance to the book's effects. There could be a reason for that, but we never see what it is. For that matter, wouldn't Stargazer think it'd add more impetus to his warnings not to open the book if he told Rarity that doing so may well cause his death? He's familiar with the book, so he should know that. It also takes a bit long for any of their friends to notice the fight. I could see if they were trying to get in and it took them that long, but the first indication we get is when Applejack's already breaking down the door.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Distraught and humiliated, she slammed her Manehattanite apartment door, making it undeniably clear that she wished to be left alone.//</span><br />This is pretty telly language, which isn&#039;t a good idea right at the beginning of the story, where you want to grab the reader&#039;s interest and connect him to the character. Take a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yet,//</span><br />It&#039;s not often that commas after conjunctions are correctly used. This one is not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b><i>Bang! Bang! Bang!</i></b>//</span><br />Sound effects in narration are a bad idea. Better to describe the sound. It&#039;s also preferred to use italics and description to communicate emphasis and intensity. Bold and all caps aren&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The now-aggravated mare//</span><br />More telling. I have nothing to go on but your word to understand her mood, so it&#039;s pretty cold and distant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>the sooner see what they want</i>//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She plastering her fake, signature business-smile on her face//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-Take this.//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that’s nice to hear but I still have no idea what it entails//</span><br />Also see the section on coma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he trailed off as his pupils shrank, inhaling and exhaling as he tried to calm himself.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to tell me he&#039;s trailing off, since I can already tell from the punctuation. Beware what&#039;s implied when you use participles, too. For one, they&#039;re commonly misplaced modifiers. By proximity, you&#039;re saying his pupils inhaled and exhaled. I can sort it out with a bit of logic, but if you&#039;re not careful, you&#039;ll write something that&#039;s ambiguous or misleading. The other problem is that both participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses synchronize actions, and it&#039;s unlikely you meant his pupils shrank at the same time he tried to calm himself. It probably happened in series, not parallel, as they imply opposite moods. Finally, what&#039;s special about the &quot;inhaling and exhaling&quot;? They&#039;re not elaborated on at all, so I don&#039;t know how it&#039;s different from default breathing, which of course he&#039;d have to do to live.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His composure slipped a little//</span><br />How so? Let me see it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>It appears that Stargazer has become… unstable because of it.</i>//</span><br />This is a common mistake people make in writing letters in fanfiction. Who would actually put the ellipsis in there. I get tha it&#039;s a dramatic pause, but that&#039;s a speech affectation. What reason would she have for putting a dramatic pause in the letter, when it&#039;s meant to be purely informative. It just doesn&#039;t come across as authentic.//<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Elements</i>//</span><br />You didn&#039;t capitalize this earlier in Stargazer&#039;s speech. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;absent-mindedly//</span><br />absentmindedly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She quickly averted her gaze from the book as unbidden thoughts of Stargazer&#039;s condition resurfaced.//</span><br />And she&#039;s sweeping aside his concerns very quickly. As much as he was afraid of it, wouldn&#039;t it take more consideration for her to think of using it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, the book had lured in a new puppet to play with, using her very mind to lead her into its jaws. As the sun set and the shadows grew longer, a sinister grin spread across the unicorn’s face.//</span><br />You&#039;ve been keeping a narration in Rarity&#039;s perspective so far, so it&#039;s a bit odd to have the narrator pull back to an omniscient point of view here for just the last few sentences of the scene. There are times that such a thing works, especially if you&#039;re creating a storybook feel by doing this and the beginning and ending of scenes, but you didn&#039;t start the story that way, so it just feels out of place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity stood with another unicorn fashionista//</span><br />Given that Rarity&#039;s trying to rewrite something that happened to her, why is this scene shown from someone else&#039;s perspective?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he made himself//</span><br />This is rendered in the same tense as when he trotted on stage, but he&#039;s presumably not still up there making it. So you need past perfect tense to show a completed action in the story&#039;s past: had made.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hoster was his name; famous for creating the first fashion convention in Manehattan.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There isn&#039;t an independent clause anywhere after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;silencing the accursed sound. Moments after the silence//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Him.</i>//</span><br />Missing your closing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>And you, trying to destroy me?”</i> it chuckled, <i>“do you really think he didn’t already try that himself?”</i>//</span><br />It already chuckled earlier in the paragraph. And the comma after &quot;chuckled&quot; is trying to make the two parts of the quote a single sentence, but you can&#039;t do that since you already had end punctuation on the first part.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;desperate//</span><br />If it was that desperate, why did it take them two days to get there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The walls//</span><br />Missing a line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight, why didn’t you do something about that moron? He was totally unprofessional!//</span><br />Do what? What sway does Twilight have over hotel employees?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Twilight—”//</span><br />There&#039;s a lot of dialogue around here that&#039;s unattributed, and when some of it doesn&#039;t even have a character action with it, it gets difficult to tell who&#039;s speaking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;side-effect//</span><br />That term doesn&#039;t use a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Corruption.//</span><br />Wait. How does she know this? It didn&#039;t say so in Rarity&#039;s letter, so did she send another one later? And if so, she knew a lot more about what she was doing when she used the book, which seriously mars her innocence. If not, then Twilight must have researched the book, but you don&#039;t mention her doing that, and Rarity told her very little to go on. How did she manage to figure it out? And when Rarity wrote that letter, she was awfully convinced of the book&#039;s danger to claim ignorance when she gave into temptation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A stallion in a black suit complimented Rarity on her dress.//</span><br />Well, yes, this rehashes what he said. That&#039;s unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Make yourself at home; my butler will retrieve anything you require.//</span><br />Comma splice. And nobody;s surprised o see her well-dressed and with a butler in a run-down hotel?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Fight it! You can do it!//</span><br />Missing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;encasing Rarity’s form//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off participial phrases with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the enraged alabaster unicorn turned to face Twilight, eyes blazing green</span><br />You&#039;re touching on some Lavender Unicorn Syndrome here. There&#039;s a section on this up top, too. And I know from reading, but grammatically, it&#039;s ambiguous whose eyes are blazing green.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>That night…</i>//</span><br />There are more elegant ways of working this into the narration than stating it outright like stage directions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;marvelous//</span><br />You spelled this &quot;marvellous&quot; earlier. Is that a British spelling?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s sprang up from her bed and scream.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying back down on her bed//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<b><i>The end?</i></b>//</span><br />Please don&#039;t do this.<br /><br />This story&#039;s not bad, but the ending took an ending I didn&#039;t expect, more because I was expecting the unexpected. If that&#039;s too confusing, basically this ending was easy to see coming.<br /><br />Mechanically speaking, the main issues were with commas and sound effects, but there was a smattering of other things. Nothing too serious. As to style, there was a lot of telly language here. It can be a difficult thing to wrap your mind around, but it helps to think as if you were a character yourself. Put yourself there as an observer. What would you notice about each character to deduce how they felt? Give me the same evidence. That&#039;s probably the biggest issue with the story.<br /><br />The plot was fine, but seemed to move too fast. Rarity takes a scene to become familiar with the book and what it can do, but then she quite rapidly falls under its control. If she really believes that it&#039;s dangerous, surely she&#039;d have more of an internal conflict over whether to use it. There&#039;s also a bit of a disconnect in how Rarity and Stargazer act under the book&#039;s influence. Stargazer was fully aware of what it had done, and was presumably okay with the trade-off until fairly recently. But Rarity seems pretty oblivious and shows no such resistance to the book&#039;s effects. There could be a reason for that, but we never see what it is. For that matter, wouldn&#039;t Stargazer think it&#039;d add more impetus to his warnings not to open the book if he told Rarity that doing so may well cause his death? He&#039;s familiar with the book, so he should know that. It also takes a bit long for any of their friends to notice the fight. I could see if they were trying to get in and it took them that long, but the first indication we get is when Applejack&#039;s already breaking down the door.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 129

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The synopsis isn't in the GDoc, obviously, but I'll comment on the one you sent in with your submission.

>ques//

Unless this is some jargon of which I'm unaware (which would itself be a problem), you've misspelled this. I'm guessing you want "queues," but I can't rule out "cues," since I don't really understand what you're trying to say anyway.

>What you think you see becomes your reality and those who are there are blessed and cursed at the same time.//

Missing comma. There's a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

To the story:

>Pinkie lay in her bed, staring dully at the ceiling. She tossed from side to side for a bit, roughing up the freshly laid blue bedspread.//

Watch out for your participles. They can often be misplaced modifiers. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so it sounds like her bad is staring at the ceiling. It's easy to sort this one out with a bit of logic, but if you aren't careful, you eventually will write something that's ambiguous or misleading. Despite its being a fairly minor example, you don't want to toss even a little speed bump this early in the story. Now take the second sentence. There's no ambiguity, because "she" is the only thing the participle could modify. However, you have identical structures here: <main clause>, <participial phrase>. Simpler constructs can pass by without notice, unless you string too many of them together, but the more complex ones become immediately noticeable when they're repeated too much. Again, somewhere in the middle of a story, this would probably escape my eye, but you don't want to establish a repetitive sentence structure right away like this.

>She continued to stare at the ceiling//

Since nothing has happened to make me think she wouldn't continue, this is just superfluous.

>to not//

I'm a stickler for split infinitives, and while I won't enforce them in others' writing as strenuously as in my own, this type is just grating. Swap these two words.

>She broke her stare-down with the ceiling//

And all three sentences in this paragraph begin with "she." I'm only three paragraphs in, and I already have the impression that the writing is going to feel very repetitive here. You don't want a reader thinking that.

>She sighed, returning the room to silence.//

Another danger of participles: they imply simultaneous action. The room wouldn't return to silence until after she sighed, not while she's doing it.

>succume//

I believe you wanted "succumbed."

>“W-what was that?” she asked herself, “White light?”//

The punctuation in the attribution implies that both parts of the quote merge into a single sentence, but they clearly don't. There's a section at the top of this thread on dialogue punctuation and capitalization.

>Pinkie slid back under the blanket//

This implies a totally different positioning of said blanket than the earlier "flinging the blanket off of her." Just a bit more explanation of what exactly she does would clear this up.

>It was important to know that even with a memory like her own//

This could use a comma to set it off from the main clause.

>keep every party and social event she had planned kept//

Watch the repetitive word choice.

>Staring at the notebooks, thoughts of yesterday popped into her head.//

Yet another danger of participles: they can become dangling participles. "Staring at the notebooks" describes Pinkie, but she doesn't appear in the clause in a way that a participle can modify. This explicitly says that her thoughts are staring at the notebooks.

>Pinkie sense//

I generally see this capitalized. I think it's a unique enough thing to do so.

>She reached a hoof up towards her forehead.//

This is the third straight sentence to use "up." It's the little things like this that can disrupt a story's flow.

>full body//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor. Note also that you're in a stretch here where 9 of 13 sentences all start with "she."

>The mirror reflected her familiar imaged.//

Typo.

>“A greasy mane is not candy-storing mane,” she said quietly.//

Missing an "a," I believe.

>She sighed again, and turned back to the window.//

This doesn't need a comma, as per the guidelines I've already referred you to. I'm getting near the bottom of the second page, and she's already sighed four times.

>strapped around to her waist//

Extraneous word.

>Sugar Cube//

Per canon, "Sugarcube."

>A sign of trouble brewing?//

I get that Pinkie's in an unusual situation, but she still has a way of speaking, even when she's serious. This just doesn't sound like her.

>shower head//

Showerhead

>Pinkie shot her hoof back and shook it about, letting the water fly off her hoof.//

Repetitive use of "hoof" where a pronoun would do.

>night-time//

And yet you go on to describe it as a little before sunset.

>Feeling it’s chill bite against her skin//

Its/it's confusion.

>she trailed off//

You don't need to tell me this when I can already see it from the punctuation.

>bashing//

Odd word choice for this situation.

>steaming up the window and mirror//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma. Since you've gotten it right elsewhere, this is probably just an oversight.

>peering through the window//

You just had Pinkie use that verb in the last paragraph.

>She slowly and purposefully wet her mane..//

Extra period.

>The linoleum wall//

Really? If you've seen these, sure, but I've never heard of linoleum anywhere but the floor.

>All she could do was look down at Rarity. Pinkie’s face grew more and more distressed with each second, as she looked down.//

More repetition. It could work stylistically here, but not as it's phrased.

>Pinkie hastily made way for the door.//

Missing word.

>french//

Capitalize.

>tripped over her feat//

Typo.

>Pinkie stood frozen as she gazed down at the broken pieces. Tears welled in her eyes as she stood over the glassware.//

Hard to believe that her first reaction wouldn't be fright from the lightning bolt or at least wondering what it was.

>Pinkie sniffled gently and whipped her nose.//

I'm guessing you meant "wiped."

>She finally noticed the tiny red stains in her hooves and pulled away her hoof.//

Repetition of "hoof," but I'm not sure this would be viable. It's hard to tell exactly how hooves work in canon, as only the males have a different color for them, though the few times we've seen the females polish theirs to a shine, they must have regular horse-type ones. So how do these bleed? They're essentially toenails. There is a spot back near the heel that could bleed, but it'd be hard to cut that by picking up glass. This might need a little more explanation.

>once vibrant//

Another descriptor needing a hyphen.

>Storm clouds gathered around Ponyville; the night sky’s beautiful stars were nowhere to be found.//

Comma splice.

>Lingering memories and abstract thoughts entered her mind once again.//

This is a pretty empty statement if I don't get to see them or how they affect her.

>She looked back toward the window, stained with water, moving one muscle at a time.//

See, these are confusing. The second participle has to leap back over the first and its object to get to what it modifies.

>her bodies soul//

You have a plural where you need a possessive, and you're missing the end punctuation. The possession is odd here, though—her soul belongs to her, not her body. In fact, I'd think they're very distinct things.

>saddness//

Typo.

>It was more a diary then it was an organizational tool.//

Then/than confusion.

>Sadness, loneliness, abandonment, and defeat.//

You've done a lot of mentioning emotions directly over the last few pages. What effect do these emotions have on her? We've seen some evidence, like when she ran back up to her room and got into bed. But this should be the norm. Show me the evidence of how she feels and get me to deduce her emotion. There's a section on show versus tell up top that describes this.

>Pinkies cheek//

Missing apostrophe.

>abandond//

Typo.

>The window creeked open.//

Typo.

>They too, had heartwarming grins on their faces.//

Either surround "too" with commas or don't use any.

>B—Because//

You do this in a couple places. Use a hyphen for a stutter, not a dash. And you only capitalize the first instance of the beginning letter, unless it's a word you have to capitalize anyway, like a name.

>Everything was pristine and without boarders.//

borders

>a hold//

You've alternated on spelling this as one or two words. Be consistent.

I've always been a bit dense at reading between the lines. So this is how I interpreted the ending: Pinkie died, and she's stuck in some sort of limbo where whatever she imagines comes to be. That's all I'm sure of. I think Twilight and Rarity died before her, and I guess Dash too, since she appears, though the journals never mention her. I'm not at all clear whether Pinkie killed them either in real life or by sucking them into this afterlife somehow. Really, none of this matters, unless I have it way wrong and it serves as a data point that you might need to be more clear. But it's not a huge deal for acceptance purposes, unless Pinkie did kill them, because then this kind of falls into the pile of overdone "Pinkie goes murderously nuts" stories. If she really is in control here, I don't get why the other ponies end up trying to coerce her to come out of her home, why they act so differently at the beginning of the story, why the red light hurts her, and why it took Twilight to explain the place to her (unless that's the real Twilight).

Really, though, this suffers from some very basic editing problems that most word processing software would have caught for you. There's also quite a lot of repetition in words, phrases, and sentence structures. It makes the writing get into a rut. That's the tough thing about writing: form is as important as function. It's not enough to have an engaging concept or good prose. It takes both.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />The synopsis isn&#039;t in the GDoc, obviously, but I&#039;ll comment on the one you sent in with your submission.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ques//</span><br />Unless this is some jargon of which I&#039;m unaware (which would itself be a problem), you&#039;ve misspelled this. I&#039;m guessing you want &quot;queues,&quot; but I can&#039;t rule out &quot;cues,&quot; since I don&#039;t really understand what you&#039;re trying to say anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What you think you see becomes your reality and those who are there are blessed and cursed at the same time.//</span><br />Missing comma. There&#039;s a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br />To the story:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie lay in her bed, staring dully at the ceiling. She tossed from side to side for a bit, roughing up the freshly laid blue bedspread.//</span><br />Watch out for your participles. They can often be misplaced modifiers. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so it sounds like her bad is staring at the ceiling. It&#039;s easy to sort this one out with a bit of logic, but if you aren&#039;t careful, you eventually will write something that&#039;s ambiguous or misleading. Despite its being a fairly minor example, you don&#039;t want to toss even a little speed bump this early in the story. Now take the second sentence. There&#039;s no ambiguity, because &quot;she&quot; is the only thing the participle could modify. However, you have identical structures here: &lt;main clause&gt;, &lt;participial phrase&gt;. Simpler constructs can pass by without notice, unless you string too many of them together, but the more complex ones become immediately noticeable when they&#039;re repeated too much. Again, somewhere in the middle of a story, this would probably escape my eye, but you don&#039;t want to establish a repetitive sentence structure right away like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She continued to stare at the ceiling//</span><br />Since nothing has happened to make me think she wouldn&#039;t continue, this is just superfluous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not//</span><br />I&#039;m a stickler for split infinitives, and while I won&#039;t enforce them in others&#039; writing as strenuously as in my own, this type is just grating. Swap these two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She broke her stare-down with the ceiling//</span><br />And all three sentences in this paragraph begin with &quot;she.&quot; I&#039;m only three paragraphs in, and I already have the impression that the writing is going to feel very repetitive here. You don&#039;t want a reader thinking that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sighed, returning the room to silence.//</span><br />Another danger of participles: they imply simultaneous action. The room wouldn&#039;t return to silence until after she sighed, not while she&#039;s doing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;succume//</span><br />I believe you wanted &quot;succumbed.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“W-what was that?” she asked herself, “White light?”//</span><br />The punctuation in the attribution implies that both parts of the quote merge into a single sentence, but they clearly don&#039;t. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread on dialogue punctuation and capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie slid back under the blanket//</span><br />This implies a totally different positioning of said blanket than the earlier &quot;flinging the blanket off of her.&quot; Just a bit more explanation of what exactly she does would clear this up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was important to know that even with a memory like her own//</span><br />This could use a comma to set it off from the main clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;keep every party and social event she had planned kept//</span><br />Watch the repetitive word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Staring at the notebooks, thoughts of yesterday popped into her head.//</span><br />Yet another danger of participles: they can become dangling participles. &quot;Staring at the notebooks&quot; describes Pinkie, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the clause in a way that a participle can modify. This explicitly says that her thoughts are staring at the notebooks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie sense//</span><br />I generally see this capitalized. I think it&#039;s a unique enough thing to do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She reached a hoof up towards her forehead.//</span><br />This is the third straight sentence to use &quot;up.&quot; It&#039;s the little things like this that can disrupt a story&#039;s flow.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;full body//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor. Note also that you&#039;re in a stretch here where 9 of 13 sentences all start with &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mirror reflected her familiar imaged.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“A greasy mane is not candy-storing mane,” she said quietly.//</span><br />Missing an &quot;a,&quot; I believe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sighed again, and turned back to the window.//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t need a comma, as per the guidelines I&#039;ve already referred you to. I&#039;m getting near the bottom of the second page, and she&#039;s already sighed four times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;strapped around to her waist//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sugar Cube//</span><br />Per canon, &quot;Sugarcube.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>A sign of trouble brewing?</i>//</span><br />I get that Pinkie&#039;s in an unusual situation, but she still has a way of speaking, even when she&#039;s serious. This just doesn&#039;t sound like her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shower head//</span><br />Showerhead<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie shot her hoof back and shook it about, letting the water fly off her hoof.//</span><br />Repetitive use of &quot;hoof&quot; where a pronoun would do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;night-time//</span><br />And yet you go on to describe it as a little before sunset.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Feeling it’s chill bite against her skin//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she trailed off//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to tell me this when I can already see it from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bashing//</span><br />Odd word choice for this situation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;steaming up the window and mirror//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma. Since you&#039;ve gotten it right elsewhere, this is probably just an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;peering through the window//</span><br />You just had Pinkie use that verb in the last paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She slowly and purposefully wet her mane..//</span><br />Extra period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The linoleum wall//</span><br />Really? If you&#039;ve seen these, sure, but I&#039;ve never heard of linoleum anywhere but the floor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All she could do was look down at Rarity. Pinkie’s face grew more and more distressed with each second, as she looked down.//</span><br />More repetition. It could work stylistically here, but not as it&#039;s phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie hastily made way for the door.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;french//</span><br />Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tripped over her feat//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie stood frozen as she gazed down at the broken pieces. Tears welled in her eyes as she stood over the glassware.//</span><br />Hard to believe that her first reaction wouldn&#039;t be fright from the lightning bolt or at least wondering what it was.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie sniffled gently and whipped her nose.//</span><br />I&#039;m guessing you meant &quot;wiped.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She finally noticed the tiny red stains in her hooves and pulled away her hoof.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;hoof,&quot; but I&#039;m not sure this would be viable. It&#039;s hard to tell exactly how hooves work in canon, as only the males have a different color for them, though the few times we&#039;ve seen the females polish theirs to a shine, they must have regular horse-type ones. So how do these bleed? They&#039;re essentially toenails. There is a spot back near the heel that could bleed, but it&#039;d be hard to cut that by picking up glass. This might need a little more explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once vibrant//</span><br />Another descriptor needing a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Storm clouds gathered around Ponyville; the night sky’s beautiful stars were nowhere to be found.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lingering memories and abstract thoughts entered her mind once again.//</span><br />This is a pretty empty statement if I don&#039;t get to see them or how they affect her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked back toward the window, stained with water, moving one muscle at a time.//</span><br />See, these are confusing. The second participle has to leap back over the first and its object to get to what it modifies.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her bodies soul//</span><br />You have a plural where you need a possessive, and you&#039;re missing the end punctuation. The possession is odd here, though—her soul belongs to her, not her body. In fact, I&#039;d think they&#039;re very distinct things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saddness//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was more a diary then it was an organizational tool.//</span><br />Then/than confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sadness, loneliness, abandonment, and defeat.//</span><br />You&#039;ve done a lot of mentioning emotions directly over the last few pages. What effect do these emotions have on her? We&#039;ve seen some evidence, like when she ran back up to her room and got into bed. But this should be the norm. Show me the evidence of how she feels and get me to deduce her emotion. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell up top that describes this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkies cheek//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;abandond//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The window creeked open.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They too, had heartwarming grins on their faces.//</span><br />Either surround &quot;too&quot; with commas or don&#039;t use any.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;B—Because//</span><br />You do this in a couple places. Use a hyphen for a stutter, not a dash. And you only capitalize the first instance of the beginning letter, unless it&#039;s a word you have to capitalize anyway, like a name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everything was pristine and without boarders.//</span><br />borders<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a hold//</span><br />You&#039;ve alternated on spelling this as one or two words. Be consistent.<br /><br />I&#039;ve always been a bit dense at reading between the lines. So this is how I interpreted the ending: Pinkie died, and she&#039;s stuck in some sort of limbo where whatever she imagines comes to be. That&#039;s all I&#039;m sure of. I think Twilight and Rarity died before her, and I guess Dash too, since she appears, though the journals never mention her. I&#039;m not at all clear whether Pinkie killed them either in real life or by sucking them into this afterlife somehow. Really, none of this matters, unless I have it way wrong and it serves as a data point that you might need to be more clear. But it&#039;s not a huge deal for acceptance purposes, unless Pinkie did kill them, because then this kind of falls into the pile of overdone &quot;Pinkie goes murderously nuts&quot; stories. If she really is in control here, I don&#039;t get why the other ponies end up trying to coerce her to come out of her home, why they act so differently at the beginning of the story, why the red light hurts her, and why it took Twilight to explain the place to her (unless that&#039;s the real Twilight).<br /><br />Really, though, this suffers from some very basic editing problems that most word processing software would have caught for you. There&#039;s also quite a lot of repetition in words, phrases, and sentence structures. It makes the writing get into a rut. That&#039;s the tough thing about writing: form is as important as function. It&#039;s not enough to have an engaging concept or good prose. It takes both.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 130

>>129761

Okay, I've finished the first round of editing. I've corrected the errors you've pointed out, added a whole lot more (hopefully interesting) substance to the first two sections, got rid of the "talking heads," and altered the ending slightly so it isn't just a straightforward "happy ending after a song."

By the way, I've since remembered why I didn't extend the first scenes any further and didn't force the "getting emotionally attached to Rarity" thing so much before. The original idea was to create a very stark contrast between the problems of the two. Rarity would have been her usual "complaining" self, her biggest issues being that she's tired and dirty. Meanwhile, Pinkie Pie is forced to admit to herself that her skill doesn't go beyond being a clown for everypony around her, which I believe is several orders of magnitude more serious. Admittedly, this fell apart somewhat once I introduced Rarity's breakdown scene as well. I suppose I was kinda hoping for everyone to think what I did: she only started doubting her own worth once the situation became that desperate.

I haven't extended the part with Pinkie's confession yet, since I'm not entirely convinced that she has any reason to hide anything at that point. Since you mentioned "Party of One," in a way, isn't the moral of that episode that not talking to your friends about your problems will only lead to false (and potentially even worse) assumptions? (e.g how she assumed they don't like her parties)

I do have a plan, however, in case you believe it wouldn't hurt the story: the noises Rarity kept waking up to were actually Pinkie getting up and trotting away, then coming back again because she couldn't decide whether to run home or stay. Rarity then notices the "straight hair" and starts asking what is wrong, Pinkie tries to deny it at first, then only talks about part of the problem, etc.

I don't know… what do you think?

Also, thank you again for all the help and attention!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129761" onclick="return highlight('129761', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129761">&gt;&gt;129761</a><br /><br />Okay, I&#039;ve finished the first round of editing. I&#039;ve corrected the errors you&#039;ve pointed out, added a whole lot more (hopefully interesting) substance to the first two sections, got rid of the &quot;talking heads,&quot; and altered the ending slightly so it isn&#039;t just a straightforward &quot;happy ending after a song.&quot; <br /><br />By the way, I&#039;ve since remembered why I didn&#039;t extend the first scenes any further and didn&#039;t force the &quot;getting emotionally attached to Rarity&quot; thing so much before. The original idea was to create a very stark contrast between the problems of the two. Rarity would have been her usual &quot;complaining&quot; self, her biggest issues being that she&#039;s tired and dirty. Meanwhile, Pinkie Pie is forced to admit to herself that her skill doesn&#039;t go beyond being a clown for everypony around her, which I believe is several orders of magnitude more serious. Admittedly, this fell apart somewhat once I introduced Rarity&#039;s breakdown scene as well. I suppose I was kinda hoping for everyone to think what I did: she only started doubting her own worth once the situation became that desperate.<br /><br />I haven&#039;t extended the part with Pinkie&#039;s confession yet, since I&#039;m not entirely convinced that she has any reason to hide anything at that point. Since you mentioned &quot;Party of One,&quot; in a way, isn&#039;t the moral of that episode that not talking to your friends about your problems will only lead to false (and potentially even worse) assumptions? (e.g how she assumed they don&#039;t like her parties)<br /><br />I do have a plan, however, in case you believe it wouldn&#039;t hurt the story: the noises Rarity kept waking up to were actually Pinkie getting up and trotting away, then coming back again because she couldn&#039;t decide whether to run home or stay. Rarity then notices the &quot;straight hair&quot; and starts asking what is wrong, Pinkie tries to deny it at first, then only talks about part of the problem, etc.<br /><br />I don&#039;t know… what do you think?<br /><br />Also, thank you again for all the help and attention!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 131

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The naive mare that had left Ponyville so many years ago sat among the sounds of her assistant Coco sewing up the last of her designs. The young mare worked tirelessly as Suri sipped a steaming cup of coffee. The morning sun made its laborious climb along the buildings as Suri went over the past in her mind.//

You just spent your opening paragraph waxing poetic about the city, then we get only two sentences of what's actually happening before you shuffle us off to a flashback. Let me settle in a bit first. Set the scene, make these things connect. Show how her train of thought leads to the past instead of immediately jumping there.

>drug her down into the drowning depths//

Dragged. And I'm not sure whether the alliteration is intentional, but it tends to create a lighthearted mood. That's fighting the serious tone you're taking.

>The Knitting League were the happiest times of her life.//

That doesn't quite parse with the mixed plural/singular words.

>to not//

I don't harass authors about split infinitives too much, but this one's so easy to avoid. Just swap these words.

>With the coffee mug set aside//

But she didn't set it aside… unless this is supposed to be the action, but it's so passive for that.

>concern in her eyes//

Show me how this looks. Don't just give me the answer. There's a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread that explains.

>as she watched her employer. A sudden harsh sigh from Suri made Coco cringe.//

The story so far has been in Suri's perspective, but these smack of being in Coco's. For one, it's a bit much for Suri to say what made Coco cringe, only that she did. But Suri's not even looking at her right now, so she wouldn't see this. You really have to keep on top of your perspective at all times.

>Y-You//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

>me-//

Please use a proper dash.

>“You know I don’t mean to yell at you like this, right?”//

This comes suddenly and with no transition. Suri was just yelling, and there's no description that she softened her expression or lowered her voice.

>ruffling the blue hair of her assistant//

You'll generally want to set off participles with a comma.

>Coco, in the meantime//

Needs another comma.

>“S-So, this Rarity–” she began before being cut off once more.//

When you have interrupted speech, the very next thing needs to be the interruption. When the narrator has time to say something in between, in undercuts the immediacy of the interruption.

>You have so much work to do and you just wanna hear about that good for nothing mare?//

Good-for-nothing. And see the section up top about comma use with conjunctions, too. You've done that several times.

>Coco ducked her head down, trying to concentrate on her work. Suri glared at the coffee mug, eyes twitching and blood beginning to boil over. She felt as though fire was rushing through her//

See, you're using two different perspectives in the same paragraph. Have a look at the section on head hopping, too.

>it’s cold fingers//

Its/it's confusion.

>her assistants every move//

Missing apostrophe.

>uptown-.

Again, use a proper dash, and lose the period.

>Suri slid her eyes to the side as the sight of Rarity made every muscle in her body tense up.//

Every sentence in this paragraph uses "as," though only 3 of the 4 use it in a time-coordinating clause. Watch the repetition.

>Coco lay on the dressing room’s couch,//

Shouldn't there be a scene break here? And last time you had one, it was just an extra blank line. You need something more noticeable.

>As her hooves strained she remembered bumping into Suri on her first day in the city.//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>We have to go, it’s time to present my work//

Comma splice.

>Suri lead the way//

led

>Coco looked to Suri, trying to think of anything she could say to make the situation better.//

You've had a few of these, but this is the first bad one. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, though you often have them skipping over that one to modify the subject. More often than not, a reader can still sort out what you mean. But here, you're saying that Suri is trying to think of something to say, but you probably meant Coco. It's ambiguous.

>Suri stood up and moved to Coco’s side.//

Missing a line break.

>To see her own creations in the hands of someone else.//

What are these "hands"?

>Suri felt a vessel in her head prepared to burst//

Verb form, and just awkward phrasing.

>Suri grit her teeth.//

gritted

>Suri in the meantime bore a hole into the young mare with her eyes.//

Bored. And "in the meantime" makes this sound like a casual action going on beside the main event. It's anything but.

>the orange one said//

Suri knows Rarity from Ponyville, and the Apples have been there since its founding. She really doesn't know who Applejack is?

>her voice prideful and every word dripping with smugness//

There's a lot of this in here, but just pointing out another spot where you shouldn't be directly informing me of your characters' emotions.

>looking down at the tattered dresses she’d work so hard for//

Worked

>spiders web//

spiderweb

>This isn’t happening, she thought to herself.//

Needs italics for the thought, and the "to herself" is pretty much always redundant for thoughts.

>A tear rolled out of the corner of her eye//

The single tear is one of the most cliched things to use here.

>She looked back one last time//

That's the third use of "look" in this paragraph alone. You use it 41 times in the story, which is getting up there. While I'm on the subject, of the easier forms to search for, you use "to be" 180 times, or about once every third sentence. That's also getting up there. This is a very boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs.

There are some intermittent problems here with repetition and use of commas and hyphens. But the biggest issues is the head-hopping. The perspective constantly bounces back and forth between Suri and Coco, often in consecutive paragraphs, and sometimes even within the same paragraph or sentence. It's very jarring. You can change perspectives from time to time, but really consider when doing so gains you something. It takes a little time to get settled into a character's head, too, and by the time I have, you've pulled me over to a different one. This is your call, but you might do better to stay in Coco's for a while, since she's the one who experiences character growth here. She's the one who changes over the course of the story, but it happened mostly off camera. It might even be interesting to see what significance her gift to Rarity had. Maybe canon will explain it later, but so far, it's just been a generic gift, where it's the thought that matters. Compare to the gift Pinkie got, which meant a lot to Cheese. What does this mean to Coco? Like I said, you don't have to take this angle, but it's an example of how you could focus on some conflict. Or if you want Suri to be the focus, spend less time in Coco's perspective and show how, say, Suri sees some of her old self in Coco, but she's pushing her to toughen up because she thinks it's for the best, even though it hurts her to do it. There are a lot of ways you could go that would make the conflict better aligned with the perspective.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The naive mare that had left Ponyville so many years ago sat among the sounds of her assistant Coco sewing up the last of her designs. The young mare worked tirelessly as Suri sipped a steaming cup of coffee. The morning sun made its laborious climb along the buildings as Suri went over the past in her mind.//</span><br />You just spent your opening paragraph waxing poetic about the city, then we get only two sentences of what&#039;s actually happening before you shuffle us off to a flashback. Let me settle in a bit first. Set the scene, make these things connect. Show how her train of thought leads to the past instead of immediately jumping there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;drug her down into the drowning depths//</span><br />Dragged. And I&#039;m not sure whether the alliteration is intentional, but it tends to create a lighthearted mood. That&#039;s fighting the serious tone you&#039;re taking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Knitting League were the happiest times of her life.//</span><br />That doesn&#039;t quite parse with the mixed plural/singular words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not//</span><br />I don&#039;t harass authors about split infinitives too much, but this one&#039;s so easy to avoid. Just swap these words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With the coffee mug set aside//</span><br />But she didn&#039;t set it aside… unless this is supposed to be the action, but it&#039;s so passive for that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;concern in her eyes//</span><br />Show me how this looks. Don&#039;t just give me the answer. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread that explains.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she watched her employer. A sudden harsh sigh from Suri made Coco cringe.//</span><br />The story so far has been in Suri&#039;s perspective, but these smack of being in Coco&#039;s. For one, it&#039;s a bit much for Suri to say what made Coco cringe, only that she did. But Suri&#039;s not even looking at her right now, so she wouldn&#039;t see this. You really have to keep on top of your perspective at all times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Y-You//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;me-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You know I don’t mean to yell at you like this, right?”//</span><br />This comes suddenly and with no transition. Suri was just yelling, and there&#039;s no description that she softened her expression or lowered her voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ruffling the blue hair of her assistant//</span><br />You&#039;ll generally want to set off participles with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coco, in the meantime//</span><br />Needs another comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“S-So, this Rarity–” she began before being cut off once more.//</span><br />When you have interrupted speech, the very next thing needs to be the interruption. When the narrator has time to say something in between, in undercuts the immediacy of the interruption.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You have so much work to do and you just wanna hear about that good for nothing mare?//</span><br />Good-for-nothing. And see the section up top about comma use with conjunctions, too. You&#039;ve done that several times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coco ducked her head down, trying to concentrate on her work. Suri glared at the coffee mug, eyes twitching and blood beginning to boil over. She felt as though fire was rushing through her//</span><br />See, you&#039;re using two different perspectives in the same paragraph. Have a look at the section on head hopping, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s cold fingers//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her assistants every move//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>uptown-.</i></span><br />Again, use a proper dash, and lose the period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suri slid her eyes to the side as the sight of Rarity made every muscle in her body tense up.//</span><br />Every sentence in this paragraph uses &quot;as,&quot; though only 3 of the 4 use it in a time-coordinating clause. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coco lay on the dressing room’s couch,//</span><br />Shouldn&#039;t there be a scene break here? And last time you had one, it was just an extra blank line. You need something more noticeable.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As her hooves strained she remembered bumping into Suri on her first day in the city.//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We have to go, it’s time to present my work//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suri lead the way//</span><br />led<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coco looked to Suri, trying to think of anything she could say to make the situation better.//</span><br />You&#039;ve had a few of these, but this is the first bad one. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, though you often have them skipping over that one to modify the subject. More often than not, a reader can still sort out what you mean. But here, you&#039;re saying that Suri is trying to think of something to say, but you probably meant Coco. It&#039;s ambiguous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suri stood up and moved to Coco’s side.//</span><br />Missing a line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To see her own creations in the hands of someone else.//</span><br />What are these &quot;hands&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suri felt a vessel in her head prepared to burst//</span><br />Verb form, and just awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suri grit her teeth.//</span><br />gritted<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suri in the meantime bore a hole into the young mare with her eyes.//</span><br />Bored. And &quot;in the meantime&quot; makes this sound like a casual action going on beside the main event. It&#039;s anything but.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the orange one said//</span><br />Suri knows Rarity from Ponyville, and the Apples have been there since its founding. She really doesn&#039;t know who Applejack is?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her voice prideful and every word dripping with smugness//</span><br />There&#039;s a lot of this in here, but just pointing out another spot where you shouldn&#039;t be directly informing me of your characters&#039; emotions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking down at the tattered dresses she’d work so hard for//</span><br />Worked<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spiders web//</span><br />spiderweb<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This isn’t happening, she thought to herself.//</span><br />Needs italics for the thought, and the &quot;to herself&quot; is pretty much always redundant for thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A tear rolled out of the corner of her eye//</span><br />The single tear is one of the most cliched things to use here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked back one last time//</span><br />That&#039;s the third use of &quot;look&quot; in this paragraph alone. You use it 41 times in the story, which is getting up there. While I&#039;m on the subject, of the easier forms to search for, you use &quot;to be&quot; 180 times, or about once every third sentence. That&#039;s also getting up there. This is a very boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />There are some intermittent problems here with repetition and use of commas and hyphens. But the biggest issues is the head-hopping. The perspective constantly bounces back and forth between Suri and Coco, often in consecutive paragraphs, and sometimes even within the same paragraph or sentence. It&#039;s very jarring. You can change perspectives from time to time, but really consider when doing so gains you something. It takes a little time to get settled into a character&#039;s head, too, and by the time I have, you&#039;ve pulled me over to a different one. This is your call, but you might do better to stay in Coco&#039;s for a while, since she&#039;s the one who experiences character growth here. She&#039;s the one who changes over the course of the story, but it happened mostly off camera. It might even be interesting to see what significance her gift to Rarity had. Maybe canon will explain it later, but so far, it&#039;s just been a generic gift, where it&#039;s the thought that matters. Compare to the gift Pinkie got, which meant a lot to Cheese. What does this mean to Coco? Like I said, you don&#039;t have to take this angle, but it&#039;s an example of how you could focus on some conflict. Or if you want Suri to be the focus, spend less time in Coco&#039;s perspective and show how, say, Suri sees some of her old self in Coco, but she&#039;s pushing her to toughen up because she thinks it&#039;s for the best, even though it hurts her to do it. There are a lot of ways you could go that would make the conflict better aligned with the perspective.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 132

>>129773
It's tough to judge on overview. Nearly anything can work if it's written well enough. We'll have to see how it turns out.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129773" onclick="return highlight('129773', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129773">&gt;&gt;129773</a><br />It&#039;s tough to judge on overview. Nearly anything can work if it&#039;s written well enough. We&#039;ll have to see how it turns out.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 133

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The synopsis isn't bad. The only thing I'll say is that you could probably rephrase it to get rid of the "to be" verbs. You have a very limited time to grab the reader's interest, and keeping things active will do that.

>The day was so extraordinarily unremarkable that Pinkie Pie’s tail twitched nervously, and would not seem to stop//

You don't need a comma there, since there's no new clause. There's a full explanation at the top of this thread in the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>ambiguous disaster precautions in anticipation//

Your narrator is taking a subjective viewpoint in Pinkie's perspective, so you have to be careful with the voicing. It keeps up that connection to that character if the narrator speaks roughly in a manner like the character might, and this word choice isn't striking me as something Pinkie might say.

>whole half second//

If you're married to this phrasing, I'd recommend hyphenating "half-second" if for no other reason than to call it out as a separate entity from "whole," but having "whole" and "half" right together like this doesn't flow very well.

>sugarcube corner//

It's the name of the shop. Capitalize it.

>found herself//

Besides being a phrasing overused by inexperienced authors, this suggests that she was passive in ending up there. That's not the case, and it also robs this of action to phrase it this way.

>ridiculously-wide//

In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are generally exempt from hyphenation.

>her mane she was raking//

What does this even mean? You also have two instances of breaking and three (well, two and a half) of taking in all this rhyme. Go for quality over quantity.

>which would most certainly have impressed her contemporary dance teacher, if only she had one//

You're going to make the same joke twice in one paragraph?

>coup de gras/

coup de grace

>a lavender-colored voice rang//

wut

>Twilight Sparkle walked into the kitchen, her brow first wrought in concern, then coated over with confusion.//

Watch the telling. We'll see if it becomes a problem. Since this is Twilight's first appearance, you don't want her seeming disconnected and blase, so it's not a good place for telling.

>Twilight decided the philosophical venture could wait.//

Wait, why have you wandered over to Twilight's perspective? She's not providing any new insight that Pinkie couldn't, so I don't see what it adds.

>22nd Batch//

I can let the "Batch-22" above slide in order to make the reference, but write out this number.

>- er-//

Pleas use proper dashes.

>Stop repeating what you say verba-who?//

And this just confirms that the word choice when Pinkie held the perspective was uncharacteristically highbrow for her.

>“Butter!” the pink menace repeated, and Twilight Sparkle shuddered in bitter agony.//

You're starting to lose me. Having Twilight act out-of-character for the sake of comedic ridiculousness can only go so far. If she's really this miserable, she doesn't have to stay, and I don't see a clear motivation for her to want to stay. She just keeps getting more and more frustrated without any thought as to why it's worth it to her.

>double-handspring//

Without hands?

>It was then that she made her sixth mistake//

Missing end punctuation.

>and crawled into the sink adjacent to Pinkie’s//

Pinkie's what?

>Pinkie sense//

Consensus is to capitalize this.

>Twilight began to understand that Pinkie had interpreted the statement quite differently from its intended meaning.//

That was already obvious. Don't over-explain this.

>sugarcubes//

Two words, in this sense.

>Twilight did her best to mimic the complex movements//

This doesn't really carry any weight if you're just going to allude to it without giving any sort of description.

Mechanically, the only thing I saw consistently was issues with commas, so good job there. As to style, there were a couple spots of inopportune telling. You also went really skewed toward flowery choices of speaking verbs. There are only 16 instances of "said" in the story, though I also noticed quite a few of "asked" as well, which I'd also consider one that blends in. It may just be my perception, then, but consider toning these down some. There's a rationale given at the top of this thread in the section on saidisms. I pointed out one spot where the alliteration got grating, but on the whole, it felt forced in places where meaning was sacrificed for the sake of odd word choice to keep the alliteration going.

Now to perspective. I pointed out a couple of places where the perspective wavered between Pinkie and Twilight, and as I said there, I don't see what the perspective change buys you there. I also have a section on head hopping which gives some of the rationale behind deciding when a perspective change is a good idea. What exacerbates this is that the narration stays equally purple for both perspectives. It's a good idea to have a narrator adopt a voice at least in the ballpark of the focus character. You're narrator feels pretty appropriate for Twilight, but he uses words and phrases that I doubt Pinkie would know, and indeed in one case, she doesn't. Now, there are instances where a mismatch in narrator and character actually works, but it has to be consistent in that regard, whereas yours isn't out of place for Twilight. This story isn't marked as Random, not that I'm a fan of using that tag as an excuse to redefine characters willy-nilly, but Twilight just didn't seem like Twilight here. She has to hold the idiot ball almost constantly for this to work, including having no apparent reason for sticking around at all, and for falling victim to nonsensical puzzles of logic. I could believe filly Twilight acting like this, but adult Twi? She gets flummoxed by Pinkie, not pulled into her mindset. Lastly, this plays out more like a scene than a story. What was at stake? What changed about either of the characters as a result of these events? There's not an overall message here—just a scene about Pinkie using Twilight as a sounding board to work her way through making these cupcakes.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />The synopsis isn&#039;t bad. The only thing I&#039;ll say is that you could probably rephrase it to get rid of the &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You have a very limited time to grab the reader&#039;s interest, and keeping things active will do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The day was so extraordinarily unremarkable that Pinkie Pie’s tail twitched nervously, and would not seem to stop//</span><br />You don&#039;t need a comma there, since there&#039;s no new clause. There&#039;s a full explanation at the top of this thread in the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ambiguous disaster precautions in anticipation//</span><br />Your narrator is taking a subjective viewpoint in Pinkie&#039;s perspective, so you have to be careful with the voicing. It keeps up that connection to that character if the narrator speaks roughly in a manner like the character might, and this word choice isn&#039;t striking me as something Pinkie might say.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whole half second//</span><br />If you&#039;re married to this phrasing, I&#039;d recommend hyphenating &quot;half-second&quot; if for no other reason than to call it out as a separate entity from &quot;whole,&quot; but having &quot;whole&quot; and &quot;half&quot; right together like this doesn&#039;t flow very well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sugarcube corner//</span><br />It&#039;s the name of the shop. Capitalize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;found herself//</span><br />Besides being a phrasing overused by inexperienced authors, this suggests that she was passive in ending up there. That&#039;s not the case, and it also robs this of action to phrase it this way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ridiculously-wide//</span><br />In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are generally exempt from hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her mane she was raking//</span><br />What does this even mean? You also have two instances of breaking and three (well, two and a half) of taking in all this rhyme. Go for quality over quantity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which would most certainly have impressed her contemporary dance teacher, if only she had one//</span><br />You&#039;re going to make the same joke twice in one paragraph?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;coup de gras/</span><br />coup de grace<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a lavender-colored voice rang//</span><br />wut<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight Sparkle walked into the kitchen, her brow first wrought in concern, then coated over with confusion.//</span><br />Watch the telling. We&#039;ll see if it becomes a problem. Since this is Twilight&#039;s first appearance, you don&#039;t want her seeming disconnected and blase, so it&#039;s not a good place for telling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight decided the philosophical venture could wait.//</span><br />Wait, why have you wandered over to Twilight&#039;s perspective? She&#039;s not providing any new insight that Pinkie couldn&#039;t, so I don&#039;t see what it adds.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;22nd Batch//</span><br />I can let the &quot;Batch-22&quot; above slide in order to make the reference, but write out this number.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- er-//</span><br />Pleas use proper dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Stop repeating what you say verba-who?//</span><br />And this just confirms that the word choice when Pinkie held the perspective was uncharacteristically highbrow for her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Butter!” the pink menace repeated, and Twilight Sparkle shuddered in bitter agony.//</span><br />You&#039;re starting to lose me. Having Twilight act out-of-character for the sake of comedic ridiculousness can only go so far. If she&#039;s really this miserable, she doesn&#039;t have to stay, and I don&#039;t see a clear motivation for her to want to stay. She just keeps getting more and more frustrated without any thought as to why it&#039;s worth it to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;double-handspring//</span><br />Without hands?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was then that she made her sixth mistake//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and crawled into the sink adjacent to Pinkie’s//</span><br />Pinkie&#039;s what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie sense//</span><br />Consensus is to capitalize this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight began to understand that Pinkie had interpreted the statement quite differently from its intended meaning.//</span><br />That was already obvious. Don&#039;t over-explain this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sugarcubes//</span><br />Two words, in this sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight did her best to mimic the complex movements//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t really carry any weight if you&#039;re just going to allude to it without giving any sort of description.<br /><br />Mechanically, the only thing I saw consistently was issues with commas, so good job there. As to style, there were a couple spots of inopportune telling. You also went really skewed toward flowery choices of speaking verbs. There are only 16 instances of &quot;said&quot; in the story, though I also noticed quite a few of &quot;asked&quot; as well, which I&#039;d also consider one that blends in. It may just be my perception, then, but consider toning these down some. There&#039;s a rationale given at the top of this thread in the section on saidisms. I pointed out one spot where the alliteration got grating, but on the whole, it felt forced in places where meaning was sacrificed for the sake of odd word choice to keep the alliteration going.<br /><br />Now to perspective. I pointed out a couple of places where the perspective wavered between Pinkie and Twilight, and as I said there, I don&#039;t see what the perspective change buys you there. I also have a section on head hopping which gives some of the rationale behind deciding when a perspective change is a good idea. What exacerbates this is that the narration stays equally purple for both perspectives. It&#039;s a good idea to have a narrator adopt a voice at least in the ballpark of the focus character. You&#039;re narrator feels pretty appropriate for Twilight, but he uses words and phrases that I doubt Pinkie would know, and indeed in one case, she doesn&#039;t. Now, there are instances where a mismatch in narrator and character actually works, but it has to be consistent in that regard, whereas yours isn&#039;t out of place for Twilight. This story isn&#039;t marked as Random, not that I&#039;m a fan of using that tag as an excuse to redefine characters willy-nilly, but Twilight just didn&#039;t seem like Twilight here. She has to hold the idiot ball almost constantly for this to work, including having no apparent reason for sticking around at all, and for falling victim to nonsensical puzzles of logic. I could believe filly Twilight acting like this, but adult Twi? She gets flummoxed by Pinkie, not pulled into her mindset. Lastly, this plays out more like a scene than a story. What was at stake? What changed about either of the characters as a result of these events? There&#039;s not an overall message here—just a scene about Pinkie using Twilight as a sounding board to work her way through making these cupcakes.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 134

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First, the formatting. The paragraph indentations are very inconsistent. This can take some trial and error to get right, as it can vary by browser and device. In Chrome, I'm seeing less than half the paragraphs indented.

>“Over there! I see one over there!” Yelled a high pitched voice.//

Dialogue punctuation/capitalization. There's a section on this at the top of this thread which gives some examples.

>Ribbet !//

Extraneous space. Why capitalize it or include the punctuation, unless you're going to make it a quote. You don't need to. And it's usually spelled "ribbit."

>revealing three bright colored fillies wielding nets//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma. And hyphenate your compound descriptors (bright-colored).

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom.

>What do you think Sweetie Belle?//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>instead of a frogs croak//

Missing apostrophe.

>Sweetie Belle shook out her captive into the jar and the three fillies looked in wonder.//

Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>its’//

Typo.

>Sweetie Belle hopped up on her stubby legs with excitement!//

Why is an objective narrator exclaiming something? And there have been several times already where you've bluntly informed me of a character's emotion. Read the section on show versus tell, too.

>*Ding Dong*//

Don't put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

>an older female voiced emanated from the kitchen//

Typo.

>He leans forward//

Why is this in persent tense?

>instead-//

Please use a proper dash.

>The giant arachnid hissed and rubbed at i’s multiple eyes distracted.//

A couple of typos.

>Two Tone shrill cry of terror//

Missing possessive.

>“Is it true you outran giant spiders and scorpions”//

Missing question mark. And you keep switching tenses in this scene.

Most of these notes were compiled near the beginning of the story. As I went on, I just encountered more and more of the same problems. Really, this needs a lot of editing help before I can even dig into the plot or character.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />First, the formatting. The paragraph indentations are very inconsistent. This can take some trial and error to get right, as it can vary by browser and device. In Chrome, I&#039;m seeing less than half the paragraphs indented.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Over there! I see one over there!” Yelled a high pitched voice.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation/capitalization. There&#039;s a section on this at the top of this thread which gives some examples.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ribbet !//</span><br />Extraneous space. Why capitalize it or include the punctuation, unless you&#039;re going to make it a quote. You don&#039;t need to. And it&#039;s usually spelled &quot;ribbit.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;revealing three bright colored fillies wielding nets//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma. And hyphenate your compound descriptors (bright-colored).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What do you think Sweetie Belle?//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;instead of a frogs croak//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle shook out her captive into the jar and the three fillies looked in wonder.//</span><br />Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its’//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle hopped up on her stubby legs with excitement!//</span><br />Why is an objective narrator exclaiming something? And there have been several times already where you&#039;ve bluntly informed me of a character&#039;s emotion. Read the section on show versus tell, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;*Ding Dong*//</span><br />Don&#039;t put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an older female voiced emanated from the kitchen//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He leans forward//</span><br />Why is this in persent tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;instead-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The giant arachnid hissed and rubbed at i’s multiple eyes distracted.//</span><br />A couple of typos.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Two Tone shrill cry of terror//</span><br />Missing possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Is it true you outran giant spiders and scorpions”//</span><br />Missing question mark. And you keep switching tenses in this scene.<br /><br />Most of these notes were compiled near the beginning of the story. As I went on, I just encountered more and more of the same problems. Really, this needs a lot of editing help before I can even dig into the plot or character.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 135

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

So, I'll tell you up front that script-format stories are one of those things that readers tend not to like unless they're exceptional. So this will really need to stand out.

>The citizens see him as a thing, I see him as a door//

Comma splice. And who is "I" here? You haven't established who this narrator is. And looking ahead, I don't immediately see that you ever do. Why are you narrating in a script anyway? Do you envision these as voice-overs?

>1000//

Write out numbers this short.

>Summer suns celebration//

Summer Sun Celebration

>could I ask when this started to happen Fluttershy?//

Missing comma for direct address.

>Of course, you see when new animals come into town; they usually come to me first.//

Misused semicolon.

>she feels like something is dark and evil lurking in the forest

There's a lot of blatant emotional telling in here. You don't even have a lot of opportunity to give me emotional context, so you really have to get it right when you do. Consider how much communication is nonverbal. Scripts don't give us any of that, so it's inherently a lot tougher to make them enjoyable as something to read, versus seeing it performed. You keep switching between past and present tense here, too.

>Hmm…so these birds are attacking Ponyville you say? I shall go there to see what trouble and shall try with all my may to help.//

So you rhyme… and then tack on a couple more words? Zecora doesn't speak like this.

>Well now Twilight, I haven’t done anything to help yet. I hope that you are exaggerating and might even be telling tales.//

And now she's not going to rhyme at all?

>Turns out the bird is hungry, not for seeds and hot sauce//

Why would a bird be hungry for hot sauce? It's stated here as if it's what would be assumed.

>and the black and yellow coat//

Birds don't have a coat…

>I don’t what though//

Missing word.

>if we don’t go make sure the princess’s are ok//

You have a possessive where you need a plural, and write it out as "okay."

>No.//

That's it? And Twilight just accepts her answer without argument?

>So you took away from the preparations//

Why does the font change here?

>Yes sir!//

Twilight's a "sir"?

>That feeling comes important later on in the story//

If you have to point that out, you're not doing it right.

>Most “high class” ponies in Canterlot never really want to near anything that doesn’t have the symbol of importance.//

How is this germane to the lightning bolt that just hit?

>BOOM//

Don't use sound effects in narration.

>We take the son of a bitch out and we make sure he goes back to hell.//

Death is from hell? So how do ponies get to heaven then?

I just kept seeing the same mistakes over and over again. This desperately needs an editor, but beyond that, it blasts through all of these events without developing the situation or giving the emotional context that makes it come alive. You have to give the reader time to get invested in the story, and it's very difficult to do that with a script, since you're omitting all the nonverbal cues and giving me minimal description. It's like watching a movie blindfolded. I haven't counted, but I suspect it's not up to our minimal word count requirement either. This would have to come back substantially different for us to consider it again, with better immersion and likely not as a script.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />So, I&#039;ll tell you up front that script-format stories are one of those things that readers tend not to like unless they&#039;re exceptional. So this will really need to stand out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The citizens see him as a thing, I see him as a door//</span><br />Comma splice. And who is &quot;I&quot; here? You haven&#039;t established who this narrator is. And looking ahead, I don&#039;t immediately see that you ever do. Why are you narrating in a script anyway? Do you envision these as voice-overs?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;1000//</span><br />Write out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Summer suns celebration//</span><br />Summer Sun Celebration<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;could I ask when this started to happen Fluttershy?//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Of course, you see when new animals come into town; they usually come to me first.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she feels like something is dark and evil lurking in the forest</span><br />There&#039;s a lot of blatant emotional telling in here. You don&#039;t even have a lot of opportunity to give me emotional context, so you really have to get it right when you do. Consider how much communication is nonverbal. Scripts don&#039;t give us any of that, so it&#039;s inherently a lot tougher to make them enjoyable as something to read, versus seeing it performed. You keep switching between past and present tense here, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hmm…so these birds are attacking Ponyville you say? I shall go there to see what trouble and shall try with all my may to help.//</span><br />So you rhyme… and then tack on a couple more words? Zecora doesn&#039;t speak like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well now Twilight, I haven’t done anything to help yet. I hope that you are exaggerating and might even be telling tales.//</span><br />And now she&#039;s not going to rhyme at all?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Turns out the bird is hungry, not for seeds and hot sauce//</span><br />Why would a bird be hungry for hot sauce? It&#039;s stated here as if it&#039;s what would be assumed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the black and yellow coat//</span><br />Birds don&#039;t have a coat…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t what though//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if we don’t go make sure the princess’s are ok//</span><br />You have a possessive where you need a plural, and write it out as &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No.//</span><br />That&#039;s it? And Twilight just accepts her answer without argument?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So you took away from the preparations//</span><br />Why does the font change here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes sir!//</span><br />Twilight&#039;s a &quot;sir&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That feeling comes important later on in the story//</span><br />If you have to point that out, you&#039;re not doing it right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Most “high class” ponies in Canterlot never really want to near anything that doesn’t have the symbol of importance.//</span><br />How is this germane to the lightning bolt that just hit?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;BOOM//</span><br />Don&#039;t use sound effects in narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We take the son of a bitch out and we make sure he goes back to hell.//</span><br />Death is from hell? So how do ponies get to heaven then?<br /><br />I just kept seeing the same mistakes over and over again. This desperately needs an editor, but beyond that, it blasts through all of these events without developing the situation or giving the emotional context that makes it come alive. You have to give the reader time to get invested in the story, and it&#039;s very difficult to do that with a script, since you&#039;re omitting all the nonverbal cues and giving me minimal description. It&#039;s like watching a movie blindfolded. I haven&#039;t counted, but I suspect it&#039;s not up to our minimal word count requirement either. This would have to come back substantially different for us to consider it again, with better immersion and likely not as a script.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 136

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Lyrica sighed, and began considering hanging up.//

Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You're also overloading me on verbs here. "Began considering hanging up." Really, you can do without the "began." It's rarely a necessary verb, and it gets overused by inexperienced writers.

>Lyrica and Lyra both knew that her lease was not in jeopardy, but neither made comment.//

This is just odd. It makes it sound like they can tell that the other knows, but over the phone, that doesn't make sense.

>whinnying with irritation//

Read the section on show versus tell, too.

>mare friend //

One word, as in "girlfriend."

>After that, Lyrica left her message.//

Well, yeah. She goes on to do so. You don't need to tell me.

>Why else would she drop me and hire her as soon as she offered?//

This is phrased as first-person, but you haven't italicized it as a thought.

>At least I’ll have something to take my mind off this mess.//

Another statement that should be indicated as a thought, but you missed an indentation here.

>audible click//

As opposed to?

>She continued towards her destination, breaking into a run when she neared the station. Lyrica waited around for a moment, pacing back and forth irritably.//

This is a really abrupt transition. One second, she's running, and the next, she's pacing around while waiting.

>newly-outfitted//

In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are generally exempt from hyphenation.

>A week later//

Why wouldn't this warrant a new paragraph?

>reporter was attractive//

Why is this just now coming out? Shouldn't you have shown me that during their interaction?

>she had a clear objective in mind: To reinvent herself.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>And so, she decided to start a band, coming up with a format for her group-to-be.//

That's a rather snap decision. Given that it's the theme of the whole story, doesn't this deserve elaboration and a focus on how she feels about it?

>She went to bed, and got up bright and early the next morning to make more flyers.//

You do an awful lot of these time transitions in the middle of paragraphs.

>But in the end, the consequential part of this story//

Referring to the story itself in narration is a mistake. The point is for the reader to get immersed and forget he's reading a story. Don't remind him.

>She sat down on her couch and practiced her guitar, then she got up and made a cup of tea.//

Last time you said where she was, it was in the taxi. So I suppose we're in her home now? You tend to blaze through things like this without giving an accounting of what characters did or where they went. They just suddenly end up somewhere.

>a stand of hair//

strand

>Click, click, click, CLICK!//

Avoid sounds effects in narration. Better to describe the sounds.

>She came back finding that she had forgotten about her dinner, that her spaghetti was overcooked and her garlic bread was scorched.//

She's actually going to leave the house with a boiling pot going?

The two biggest things here are that you spend a lot of time listing actions without showing me how Lyrica feels about any of it. Just reading the events get boring. I want to know what sort of an emotional journey Lyrica's going on. After all, that's why the events are there, right? In a related matter, when you do give me some of her emotional context, it's in the form of blunt, telly statements that directly relate her emotions instead of getting me to deduce them. You also have a tendency to make time skips in the middle of paragraphs and include one or two insignificant events that occurred during it. But sometimes these events are acutally pretty important to the story, yet you still blast over them and give them to us in summary form only. That ends up hurting the pacing—we get detail about a day, and then rip through overnight or a couple of days with just one or two details. If those events are important, elaborate on them. If not, just do a regular scene transition and tell me it's the next day or whatever.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyrica sighed, and began considering hanging up.//</span><br />Have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You&#039;re also overloading me on verbs here. &quot;Began considering hanging up.&quot; Really, you can do without the &quot;began.&quot; It&#039;s rarely a necessary verb, and it gets overused by inexperienced writers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyrica and Lyra both knew that her lease was not in jeopardy, but neither made comment.//</span><br />This is just odd. It makes it sound like they can tell that the other knows, but over the phone, that doesn&#039;t make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whinnying with irritation//</span><br />Read the section on show versus tell, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mare friend //</span><br />One word, as in &quot;girlfriend.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After that, Lyrica left her message.//</span><br />Well, yeah. She goes on to do so. You don&#039;t need to tell me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why else would she drop me and hire her as soon as she offered?//</span><br />This is phrased as first-person, but you haven&#039;t italicized it as a thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At least I’ll have something to take my mind off this mess.//</span><br />Another statement that should be indicated as a thought, but you missed an indentation here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;audible click//</span><br />As opposed to?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She continued towards her destination, breaking into a run when she neared the station. Lyrica waited around for a moment, pacing back and forth irritably.//</span><br />This is a really abrupt transition. One second, she&#039;s running, and the next, she&#039;s pacing around while waiting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;newly-outfitted//</span><br />In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are generally exempt from hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A week later//</span><br />Why wouldn&#039;t this warrant a new paragraph?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reporter was attractive//</span><br />Why is this just now coming out? Shouldn&#039;t you have shown me that during their interaction?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she had a clear objective in mind: To reinvent herself.//</span><br />Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And so, she decided to start a band, coming up with a format for her group-to-be.//</span><br />That&#039;s a rather snap decision. Given that it&#039;s the theme of the whole story, doesn&#039;t this deserve elaboration and a focus on how she feels about it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She went to bed, and got up bright and early the next morning to make more flyers.//</span><br />You do an awful lot of these time transitions in the middle of paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But in the end, the consequential part of this story//</span><br />Referring to the story itself in narration is a mistake. The point is for the reader to get immersed and forget he&#039;s reading a story. Don&#039;t remind him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sat down on her couch and practiced her guitar, then she got up and made a cup of tea.//</span><br />Last time you said where she was, it was in the taxi. So I suppose we&#039;re in her home now? You tend to blaze through things like this without giving an accounting of what characters did or where they went. They just suddenly end up somewhere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a stand of hair//</span><br />strand<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Click, click, click, CLICK!//</span><br />Avoid sounds effects in narration. Better to describe the sounds.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She came back finding that she had forgotten about her dinner, that her spaghetti was overcooked and her garlic bread was scorched.//</span><br />She&#039;s actually going to leave the house with a boiling pot going?<br /><br />The two biggest things here are that you spend a lot of time listing actions without showing me how Lyrica feels about any of it. Just reading the events get boring. I want to know what sort of an emotional journey Lyrica&#039;s going on. After all, that&#039;s why the events are there, right? In a related matter, when you do give me some of her emotional context, it&#039;s in the form of blunt, telly statements that directly relate her emotions instead of getting me to deduce them. You also have a tendency to make time skips in the middle of paragraphs and include one or two insignificant events that occurred during it. But sometimes these events are acutally pretty important to the story, yet you still blast over them and give them to us in summary form only. That ends up hurting the pacing—we get detail about a day, and then rip through overnight or a couple of days with just one or two details. If those events are important, elaborate on them. If not, just do a regular scene transition and tell me it&#039;s the next day or whatever.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 137

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>tearing out off a chunk of it//

Looks like you changed your mind on which preposition to use but forgot to delete the old one.

>Glances//

The indentation's a little uneven here. Looks like it persists here and there throughout the story. Note that this can vary by browser or device.

>from both her table and from around the cafeteria//

Repeating the "from" defeats the purpose of using "both."

>Ya’ve been at it for nearly two months now and I can’t imagine those cold walks home are helping ya rest.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. There's a section on comma use with conjunction at the top of this thread.

>She swooped her arms through her air//

I think you meant "hair"? And probably "swiped"? "Swoop" doesn't take a direct object.

>eyeing everyone else with a gleam in her eyes//

Watch the word repetition.

>blanks stares//

Typo.

>Swabbing a napkin across her mouth, Applejack crumpled it up and put it on top of what was left of her lunch.//

Note that participles imply simultaneous action, so she wiping her mouth at the same time she's crumpling the napkin up.

>said Applejack//

Looking at your speaking verbs from the beginning, I see:
replied, shrieked, pouted, chirped, corrected, muttered, explained, sighed, countered, explained, gushed, and finally we have a said!
I'm estimating about 150-200 quotes in your story, and you only use "said" 24 times. That's actually more than I was expecting it to be, but when you've front-loaded the story with all these exotic ones, you've already created that impression. They become distracting and draw attention away from the story to the writing itself. There's also a section up top about these "saidisms," but I've pretty much given you the explanation here.

>Actual construction workers are fixing it up now, that leaves me to help out cleaning the rest of the school.//

Comma splice. And why are the other girls helping her clean up? The mess wasn't their fault. I could figure out that they just want to help her, but it's worth saying so I don't have to.

>The moon peaked through the eastmost windows//

Peak/peek confusion. You get this wrong a lot. And it's "easternmost."

>Fluttershy clasped the handle//

That's a really odd word choice. Maybe you meant "grasped"?

>emergency lights//

Why are the emergency lights on? That's typically only if there's a power failure or the fire alarm is going off or something. They wouldn't have those on for people to be in the building late—they'd just leave a small number of lights on.

>perpendicular to her forearms//

Is it really important that we know this detail?

>interspaced//

Did you mean "interspersed"? Even so, that suggests a periodic thing, which you don't have here.

>an old-fashioned pocket watch//

I'm not sure what you're doing with this detail. It doesn't set the scene or tell me anything about the character. Maybe it becomes important to the plot? We'll see…

>“We have a…” The janitor readjusted the mops in the closet so that their ends all pointed in different directions. “… history.//

Looks like you're trying to put a narrative aside in a quote. Here's how:
“We have a—” the janitor readjusted the mops in the closet so that their ends all pointed in different directions “—history.

>Turning away from the closet, the group sped away from Discord with Applejack at the head now. Going around a corner, they came to a stop, their footsteps echoing down the halls. Sliding up next to the lockers, Applejack let out a deep breath.//

Have a look at this paragraph. Every sentence goes <participial phrase>, <main clause>. It's getting in a rut. I've noticed the sheer number of participles you use, too.

>lets not waste anymore time//

Missing apostrophe, and in this sense, "any more" needs to be two words.

>one of the doors handles//

Typo.

>were a dizzying array//

Number agreement.

>near the back of the room, near//

More word repetition.

scanned of the ones on the right//
Typo.

>Pinkie sped off to around a corner//

Extraneous word.

>Note to self: Never get between Pinkie and her cosmetics.//

Only capitalize after a comma if it refers to multiple sentences.

>Sliding out into the sink area, she waved her hands through the air, but the room still remained dark. Momentarily frowning, she flicked on her flashlight, casting a yellow glow around her. Grinning, she walked over the sink, humming as she turned it on.//

Another paragraph of very repetitive sentence structures. All three begin with participles, and two end with them. There are five participles in only three sentences.

>M-mr.//

You do need to capitalize both of these, since it's a word that'd have to be capitalized anyway.

>yet,//

It is unusual for commas after conjunctions to be used correctly. This one is not.

>shined a light//

"Shined" is what you do to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

> “It might have moved,” Sunset replied, “maybe we shoul—”//

As punctuated, the entire set of quotes would form a complete sentence, but it'd be a run-on.

>It was as big as person//

Missing word.

>t-the //

Think about what sound would actually be repeated. Not just the "t."

>schpiel//

spiel

>“‘You think,’”//

Why the inner quotes? It's not a direct quotation.

>tried to catch their breaths//

It's a collective noun. Just use it in the singular.

>she turned her head over to the Applejack//

Extraneous word.

>She gather them in a group//

Verb form.

>S-shouldn't//

Again, consider what sound is actually repeated.

>definitely feral now,” Sunset continued. “It’s definitely//

Repeated word. And how exactly does a sentient species go feral?

>Sunset peaked her head out from around a corner//

Missing a line break.

>The thestral spun away from from the trap//

Repeated word.

>Bet you thought you’d got the best me!” she goated.//

Missing word, and you must be going for "goaded." A questionable choice of speaking verb, though.

>Reaching up, she grabbed her upper teeth and yanked them out//

The antecedents for your pronouns are getting ambiguous here. This sounds more like she yanked her own teeth out.

>highlighting her curves//

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be getting from this…

>She ran a hand across her bare skin//

…or this. Where does she have bare skin? Her face? You haven't described her outfit enough for me to tell.

>Costume//

Why would this be capitalized?

>Shy-shy//

Capitalize both parts.

That ending just did not make any sense to me. So Fluttershy is doing a bat costume and is pranking Applejack? The ending joke was just weak. Why would Fluttershy stop to say that rather than continue flying away? And it's not even funny.

The biggest problems here are assorted editing issues, repetition, and a need for some more emotional context. There are too many spots, particularly at the beginning, where you get focused on relaying event after event without showing me how the characters feel about it. This got better toward the end when you went into horror mode, but a word about that as well: Good horror affects all the senses. Too many writers focus on only what is seen or heard in general and for horror specifically. You do have the scene where Pinkie feels warm breath on her neck, so that's a good use of a different sense. What might they smell or taste? Admittedly, the latter is tough to do in this situation, but since it ends up being important, you could describe the flavor of the lipstick. You also have to ratchet up the level of creepiness gradually. Keep it going up a steady slope; if you rely on the same scares over and over again, the reader gets used to them, and they become stale and ineffective. However, you have a very limited number of encounters here: one with Pinkie and one with everyone else, when Applejack gets tangled in the net. I guess this depends on whether you want a fairly quick resolution here, but you could get away with putting in more scenes without making it feel padded, as long as it was building the tension. Finally, the most effective monster is the one you never see. It disarmed the tension somewhat for Pinkie to see as much of it as she did, and it let the air out entirely when Sunset immediately identified what it was and knew it wasn't dangerous. That'll hinge more on how much you want this part of the story to feel like horror or whether you really do want to keep it as light as possible.

Still, this wasn't a bad story, and I enjoyed reading it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tearing out off a chunk of it//</span><br />Looks like you changed your mind on which preposition to use but forgot to delete the old one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Glances//</span><br />The indentation&#039;s a little uneven here. Looks like it persists here and there throughout the story. Note that this can vary by browser or device.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;from both her table and from around the cafeteria//</span><br />Repeating the &quot;from&quot; defeats the purpose of using &quot;both.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ya’ve been at it for nearly two months now and I can’t imagine those cold walks home are helping ya rest.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses. There&#039;s a section on comma use with conjunction at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She swooped her arms through her air//</span><br />I think you meant &quot;hair&quot;? And probably &quot;swiped&quot;? &quot;Swoop&quot; doesn&#039;t take a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyeing everyone else with a gleam in her eyes//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blanks stares//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Swabbing a napkin across her mouth, Applejack crumpled it up and put it on top of what was left of her lunch.//</span><br />Note that participles imply simultaneous action, so she wiping her mouth at the same time she&#039;s crumpling the napkin up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said Applejack//</span><br />Looking at your speaking verbs from the beginning, I see:<br />replied, shrieked, pouted, chirped, corrected, muttered, explained, sighed, countered, explained, gushed, and finally we have a said!<br />I&#039;m estimating about 150-200 quotes in your story, and you only use &quot;said&quot; 24 times. That&#039;s actually more than I was expecting it to be, but when you&#039;ve front-loaded the story with all these exotic ones, you&#039;ve already created that impression. They become distracting and draw attention away from the story to the writing itself. There&#039;s also a section up top about these &quot;saidisms,&quot; but I&#039;ve pretty much given you the explanation here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Actual construction workers are fixing it up now, that leaves me to help out cleaning the rest of the school.//</span><br />Comma splice. And why are the other girls helping her clean up? The mess wasn&#039;t their fault. I could figure out that they just want to help her, but it&#039;s worth saying so I don&#039;t have to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The moon peaked through the eastmost windows//</span><br />Peak/peek confusion. You get this wrong a lot. And it&#039;s &quot;easternmost.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy clasped the handle//</span><br />That&#039;s a really odd word choice. Maybe you meant &quot;grasped&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;emergency lights//</span><br />Why are the emergency lights on? That&#039;s typically only if there&#039;s a power failure or the fire alarm is going off or something. They wouldn&#039;t have those on for people to be in the building late—they&#039;d just leave a small number of lights on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;perpendicular to her forearms//</span><br />Is it really important that we know this detail?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;interspaced//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;interspersed&quot;? Even so, that suggests a periodic thing, which you don&#039;t have here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an old-fashioned pocket watch//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re doing with this detail. It doesn&#039;t set the scene or tell me anything about the character. Maybe it becomes important to the plot? We&#039;ll see…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“We have a…” The janitor readjusted the mops in the closet so that their ends all pointed in different directions. “… history.//</span><br />Looks like you&#039;re trying to put a narrative aside in a quote. Here&#039;s how:<br />“We have a—” the janitor readjusted the mops in the closet so that their ends all pointed in different directions “—history.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Turning away from the closet, the group sped away from Discord with Applejack at the head now. Going around a corner, they came to a stop, their footsteps echoing down the halls. Sliding up next to the lockers, Applejack let out a deep breath.//</span><br />Have a look at this paragraph. Every sentence goes &lt;participial phrase&gt;, &lt;main clause&gt;. It&#039;s getting in a rut. I&#039;ve noticed the sheer number of participles you use, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lets not waste anymore time//</span><br />Missing apostrophe, and in this sense, &quot;any more&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one of the doors handles//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;were a dizzying array//</span><br />Number agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;near the back of the room, near//</span><br />More word repetition.<br /><br />scanned of the ones on the right//<br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie sped off to around a corner//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Note to self: Never get between Pinkie and her cosmetics.//</span><br />Only capitalize after a comma if it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sliding out into the sink area, she waved her hands through the air, but the room still remained dark. Momentarily frowning, she flicked on her flashlight, casting a yellow glow around her. Grinning, she walked over the sink, humming as she turned it on.//</span><br />Another paragraph of very repetitive sentence structures. All three begin with participles, and two end with them. There are five participles in only three sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;M-mr.//</span><br />You do need to capitalize both of these, since it&#039;s a word that&#039;d have to be capitalized anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yet,//</span><br />It is unusual for commas after conjunctions to be used correctly. This one is not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shined a light//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is what you do to brass or shoes. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; “It might have moved,” Sunset replied, “maybe we shoul—”//</span><br />As punctuated, the entire set of quotes would form a complete sentence, but it&#039;d be a run-on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was as big as person//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;t-the //</span><br />Think about what sound would actually be repeated. Not just the &quot;t.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;schpiel//</span><br />spiel<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“‘You think,’”//</span><br />Why the inner quotes? It&#039;s not a direct quotation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tried to catch their breaths//</span><br />It&#039;s a collective noun. Just use it in the singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she turned her head over to the Applejack//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She gather them in a group//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S-shouldn&#039;t//</span><br />Again, consider what sound is actually repeated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;definitely feral now,” Sunset continued. “It’s definitely//</span><br />Repeated word. And how exactly does a sentient species go feral?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset peaked her head out from around a corner//</span><br />Missing a line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The thestral spun away from from the trap//</span><br />Repeated word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bet you thought you’d got the best me!” she goated.//</span><br />Missing word, and you must be going for &quot;goaded.&quot; A questionable choice of speaking verb, though.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Reaching up, she grabbed her upper teeth and yanked them out//</span><br />The antecedents for your pronouns are getting ambiguous here. This sounds more like she yanked her own teeth out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;highlighting her curves//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure what I&#039;m supposed to be getting from this…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She ran a hand across her bare skin//</span><br />…or this. Where does she have bare skin? Her face? You haven&#039;t described her outfit enough for me to tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Costume//</span><br />Why would this be capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shy-shy//</span><br />Capitalize both parts.<br /><br />That ending just did not make any sense to me. So Fluttershy is doing a bat costume and is pranking Applejack? The ending joke was just weak. Why would Fluttershy stop to say that rather than continue flying away? And it&#039;s not even funny.<br /><br />The biggest problems here are assorted editing issues, repetition, and a need for some more emotional context. There are too many spots, particularly at the beginning, where you get focused on relaying event after event without showing me how the characters feel about it. This got better toward the end when you went into horror mode, but a word about that as well: Good horror affects all the senses. Too many writers focus on only what is seen or heard in general and for horror specifically. You do have the scene where Pinkie feels warm breath on her neck, so that&#039;s a good use of a different sense. What might they smell or taste? Admittedly, the latter is tough to do in this situation, but since it ends up being important, you could describe the flavor of the lipstick. You also have to ratchet up the level of creepiness gradually. Keep it going up a steady slope; if you rely on the same scares over and over again, the reader gets used to them, and they become stale and ineffective. However, you have a very limited number of encounters here: one with Pinkie and one with everyone else, when Applejack gets tangled in the net. I guess this depends on whether you want a fairly quick resolution here, but you could get away with putting in more scenes without making it feel padded, as long as it was building the tension. Finally, the most effective monster is the one you never see. It disarmed the tension somewhat for Pinkie to see as much of it as she did, and it let the air out entirely when Sunset immediately identified what it was and knew it wasn&#039;t dangerous. That&#039;ll hinge more on how much you want this part of the story to feel like horror or whether you really do want to keep it as light as possible.<br /><br />Still, this wasn&#039;t a bad story, and I enjoyed reading it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 138

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Boredom - the silent killer.//

I'd say to use a proper dash instead of a hyphen, but a colon seems more appropriate.

>Until now.//

These little quick-hit paragraphs work when they stand out. The more of them you use, the more you defeat their purpose. And I'm seeing quite a few of them.

>(which caused him to almost get tossed in the dungeon)//

Parentheticals work best in a very personal narration, like first-person or deeply subjective third-person.

>But then, suddenly, it hit him - literally.//

And now I will say: please use a proper dash, not a hyphen.

>in quite sometime//

In this sense, "some time" needs to be two words.

>While horrible weather reigned over//

Reigned over what? That phrasing suggests an object.

>And Twilight Sparkle was going to do just that.//

At least it's not the first scene, but a weather-report opening is still a bad idea. I'm also noting the sheer number of "to be" verbs I've seen already. They're inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs.

>"Discord?" she asked, in pure confusion.//

Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Bottom line: this is a big moment in the story, and you'll distance the reader from it if you don't get me to see the confusion for myself.

>its'//

its

>she pressed play and kept her eyes on the bare wall that sufficed as her screen, happily watching each scene unfold.//

You do this a lot, but at least most instances haven't been confusing. Note that participles like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start the sentence. So your "happily watching" tends to describe the screen. In fact, we have to go back through the wall and here eyes before we finally get to the intended object. It's a bad idea to separate a phrase so far from what it describes.

>it had to something absurd//

Syntax is off.

>…he really was childish, wasn't it?//

First off, "it" doesn't work here. Second, a leading ellipsis is for a continued sentence that left off earlier or for speech that's just becoming audible. You don't have either here.

>-you're the most chaotic being in all of Equestria//

Same deal with a leading dash.

>He stroked his goatee in thought, and arched an eyebrow.//

Also have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>so- …//

Don't use these together. They mean opposite things.

>napsack//

The word is "knapsack," but based on your description, I think you want "bindle."

Most of these detailed notes are only examples—the problems occur multiple times through the story. In addition, I'd point out the abundance of unusual speaking verbs you use. It gets better later in the story, but in the beginning, you did this enough that I definitely noticed it, and you don't want the reader noticing the writing itself so much. The rationale behind this is discussed in the section on saidisms at the top of this thread.

Well… okay. We're kind of tossed into shipping here without anything to build it up as natural and believable. Discord at least gives a tiny bit of explanation as to how he feels, but it's still quite sudden, and Twilight immediately decides she reciprocates? These characters need to seem real, and you have to develop some authentic chemistry between them. You can't just throw two characters together and ask me to provide the investment. This is one of the most common problems with shipping stories. The relationship itself is as important as any of the characters. It needs to be developed with the same care, and it needs to have the same depth.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Boredom - the silent killer.//</span><br />I&#039;d say to use a proper dash instead of a hyphen, but a colon seems more appropriate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Until now.//</span><br />These little quick-hit paragraphs work when they stand out. The more of them you use, the more you defeat their purpose. And I&#039;m seeing quite a few of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(which caused him to almost get tossed in the dungeon)//</span><br />Parentheticals work best in a very personal narration, like first-person or deeply subjective third-person.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But then, suddenly, it hit him - literally.//</span><br />And now I will say: please use a proper dash, not a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in quite sometime//</span><br />In this sense, &quot;some time&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;While horrible weather reigned over//</span><br />Reigned over what? That phrasing suggests an object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And Twilight Sparkle was going to do just that.//</span><br />At least it&#039;s not the first scene, but a weather-report opening is still a bad idea. I&#039;m also noting the sheer number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs I&#039;ve seen already. They&#039;re inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Discord?&quot; she asked, in pure confusion.//</span><br />Check out the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Bottom line: this is a big moment in the story, and you&#039;ll distance the reader from it if you don&#039;t get me to see the confusion for myself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its&#039;//</span><br />its<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she pressed play and kept her eyes on the bare wall that sufficed as her screen, happily watching each scene unfold.//</span><br />You do this a lot, but at least most instances haven&#039;t been confusing. Note that participles like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start the sentence. So your &quot;happily watching&quot; tends to describe the screen. In fact, we have to go back through the wall and here eyes before we finally get to the intended object. It&#039;s a bad idea to separate a phrase so far from what it describes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it had to something absurd//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…he really was childish, wasn&#039;t it?//</span><br />First off, &quot;it&quot; doesn&#039;t work here. Second, a leading ellipsis is for a continued sentence that left off earlier or for speech that&#039;s just becoming audible. You don&#039;t have either here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;-you&#039;re the most chaotic being in all of Equestria//</span><br />Same deal with a leading dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He stroked his goatee in thought, and arched an eyebrow.//</span><br />Also have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so- …//</span><br />Don&#039;t use these together. They mean opposite things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;napsack//</span><br />The word is &quot;knapsack,&quot; but based on your description, I think you want &quot;bindle.&quot;<br /><br />Most of these detailed notes are only examples—the problems occur multiple times through the story. In addition, I&#039;d point out the abundance of unusual speaking verbs you use. It gets better later in the story, but in the beginning, you did this enough that I definitely noticed it, and you don&#039;t want the reader noticing the writing itself so much. The rationale behind this is discussed in the section on saidisms at the top of this thread.<br /><br />Well… okay. We&#039;re kind of tossed into shipping here without anything to build it up as natural and believable. Discord at least gives a tiny bit of explanation as to how he feels, but it&#039;s still quite sudden, and Twilight immediately decides she reciprocates? These characters need to seem real, and you have to develop some authentic chemistry between them. You can&#039;t just throw two characters together and ask me to provide the investment. This is one of the most common problems with shipping stories. The relationship itself is as important as any of the characters. It needs to be developed with the same care, and it needs to have the same depth.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 139

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I have to say, that synopsis is the exact opposite of enticing. All I get from it is that there's a soldier involved. I have a better sense of what happens from the story's tags.

>"But it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play"//

If you're going to put this in quotes, the ones nested inside it should be single quotes. And you don't need that comma. That goes for the title on the story's main page as well.

>the only thing one could see were fields and farms//

Number mismatch

>suprisingly comfy seat//

You have to be careful of words that express an opinion. Your narrator hasn't taken on any character's perspective, so who is it that's surprised? It'd be a stretch to say it was the character being described anyway, but he's asleep and can't express any opinions. It's also misspelled.

>The red material of the uniform fit the stallion’s grey hair surprisingly well.//

Besides being repetitive in using the same word again, here's another unattached opinion. I'll also say the amount of past participles is a bit off-putting. Why not go with simple past for most of them? Tacking that "was" on saps the verbs of their action. It's a tense best used sparingly.

>bursted//

While this is an acceptable past tense, it's usually reserved for something like a balloon or bubble. I think "burst" would work much better here.

>He growled, clearly displeased by having to deal with such a passenger.//

See the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Early in the story like this is the place to engage me, and telly language doesn't do that.

>“Thank you very much, “The grey pony replied politely.//

Misplaced quotation marks and dialogue tag capitalization.

>He was used to such reactions, but it didn’t mean he liked them.//

And now we've finally established the narrator as being in the passenger's perspective. But my earlier points about the narrator expressing an opinion still stand, since this character was asleep at the time.

>buffon//

buffoon

>the medals on his chest shined brightly//

"Shined" is what you do to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

>wearer - a//

Please use a proper dash.

>The grey pony thoroughly checked all the details, not excluding the smallest ones.//

The second half of this sentence is entirely extraneous.

>He realized why the command has sent him here//

Why the switch to present tense?

>he’s learnt it’s layout//

Present tense again? And its/it's confusion.

>He took of his shako and bowed.//

Typo.

>“I’m sorry, but we’re all out,” she replied bluntly.//

Now I have to wonder why you're using Applejack at all. She's never shown the least bit of disdain for soldiers or willingness to forgo a sale. So to put her in this situation begs explanation. Either get at what makes Applejack feel this way, or you might as well use an OC here.

>face!|//

Missed the closing quotation marks.

>“Eeyup…”//

This scene was very heavy-handed. It could have been accomplished in the previous scene with some well-placed body language and a couple of muttered phrases instead of over-explaining it all.

>“murderers from Totenhoof//

More missing quotation marks.

>paid by the Princesses for slaughtering civilians and burning cities and villages to the ground//

Wouldn't this imply Applejack would harbor just as much of a grudge, if not more, against Celestia? So why hasn't Celestia done anything about this prevailing mood?

>It had been a few minutes and he had already ran into more Bearers//

See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. And you have a bad verb form here (had run).

>Exactly one hundred and twenty, miss//

"Miss" would be capitalized, since he was trying to use it as part of her name.

>“She didn’t tell you…” The yellow pegasus whispered.//

Dialogue tag capitalization.

>1200//

Spell out numbers unless they get exceedingly long.

>CAN’T YOU SEE IT’S ONE OF THIS BAD, CRUEL MURDERERS?

Syntax is off, this really doesn't sound like something Fluttershy would say, and italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis or volume.

>orders, to//

Extraneous space.

>red-coats

>redcoats//
Inconsistent spelling.

>Don’t think anypony from our town is going to join your band of murderers, sergeant!//

"Sergeant" would be capitalized as a term of address. But back to my earlier point about why ponies should regard Celestia the same way they do these soldiers. As close as Twilight is to Celestia, wouldn't she know the truth? Particularly for someone who appreciates facts more than unfounded impressions?

>ss well as//

Typo.

>The lavender unicorn//

Why do you keep referring to them with these descriptors? He knows who they are.

>wrily//

wryly

>"Oh, boy",//

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>she laughed in response. - “Give me back my shako”!//

Exclamation mark goes inside the quotes, too. And what is that hyphen doing there? As she continues to talk, you don't have her speech in quotes, either.

>bearers//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this.

>“And he hit me!” Rainbow Dash seconded her. “Let me at him!”//

Missing a bunch of line breaks in this area.

>Press gang//

I'm not familiar with this term. Did you mean something like a compulsory draft?

The story itself is fine, aside from the inexplicable use of canon characters in decidedly out-of-character ways. I can't help but think it would have worked with a cast of original characters, but forcing the Elements into roles that don't suit them… really, only Rainbow Dash was believable. Beyond that, this story needs a lot of editing help. There are just a whole lot of very basic and inconsistent errors.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />I have to say, that synopsis is the exact opposite of enticing. All I get from it is that there&#039;s a soldier involved. I have a better sense of what happens from the story&#039;s tags.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>&quot;But it&#039;s &quot;Thank you, Mister Atkins&quot;, when the band begins to play&quot;</i>//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to put this in quotes, the ones nested inside it should be single quotes. And you don&#039;t need that comma. That goes for the title on the story&#039;s main page as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the only thing one could see were fields and farms//</span><br />Number mismatch<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;suprisingly comfy seat//</span><br />You have to be careful of words that express an opinion. Your narrator hasn&#039;t taken on any character&#039;s perspective, so who is it that&#039;s surprised? It&#039;d be a stretch to say it was the character being described anyway, but he&#039;s asleep and can&#039;t express any opinions. It&#039;s also misspelled.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The red material of the uniform fit the stallion’s grey hair surprisingly well.//</span><br />Besides being repetitive in using the same word again, here&#039;s another unattached opinion. I&#039;ll also say the amount of past participles is a bit off-putting. Why not go with simple past for most of them? Tacking that &quot;was&quot; on saps the verbs of their action. It&#039;s a tense best used sparingly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bursted//</span><br />While this is an acceptable past tense, it&#039;s usually reserved for something like a balloon or bubble. I think &quot;burst&quot; would work much better here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He growled, clearly displeased by having to deal with such a passenger.//</span><br />See the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Early in the story like this is the place to engage me, and telly language doesn&#039;t do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Thank you very much, “The grey pony replied politely.//</span><br />Misplaced quotation marks and dialogue tag capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was used to such reactions, but it didn’t mean he liked them.//</span><br />And now we&#039;ve finally established the narrator as being in the passenger&#039;s perspective. But my earlier points about the narrator expressing an opinion still stand, since this character was asleep at the time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;buffon//</span><br />buffoon<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the medals on his chest shined brightly//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is what you do to brass or shoes. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wearer - a//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The grey pony thoroughly checked all the details, not excluding the smallest ones.//</span><br />The second half of this sentence is entirely extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He realized why the command has sent him here//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he’s learnt it’s layout//</span><br />Present tense again? And its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He took of his shako and bowed.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I’m sorry, but we’re all out,” she replied bluntly.//</span><br />Now I have to wonder why you&#039;re using Applejack at all. She&#039;s never shown the least bit of disdain for soldiers or willingness to forgo a sale. So to put her in this situation begs explanation. Either get at what makes Applejack feel this way, or you might as well use an OC here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;face!|//</span><br />Missed the closing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Eeyup…”//</span><br />This scene was very heavy-handed. It could have been accomplished in the previous scene with some well-placed body language and a couple of muttered phrases instead of over-explaining it all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“murderers from Totenhoof//</span><br />More missing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;paid by the Princesses for slaughtering civilians and burning cities and villages to the ground//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t this imply Applejack would harbor just as much of a grudge, if not more, against Celestia? So why hasn&#039;t Celestia done anything about this prevailing mood?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It had been a few minutes and he had already ran into more Bearers//</span><br />See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. And you have a bad verb form here (had run).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Exactly one hundred and twenty, miss//</span><br />&quot;Miss&quot; would be capitalized, since he was trying to use it as part of her name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“She didn’t tell you…” The yellow pegasus whispered.//</span><br />Dialogue tag capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;1200//</span><br />Spell out numbers unless they get exceedingly long.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;CAN’T YOU SEE IT’S ONE OF THIS BAD, CRUEL MURDERERS?</span><br />Syntax is off, this really doesn&#039;t sound like something Fluttershy would say, and italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis or volume.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;orders, to//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;red-coats</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;redcoats//</span><br />Inconsistent spelling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t think anypony from our town is going to join your band of murderers, sergeant!//</span><br />&quot;Sergeant&quot; would be capitalized as a term of address. But back to my earlier point about why ponies should regard Celestia the same way they do these soldiers. As close as Twilight is to Celestia, wouldn&#039;t she know the truth? Particularly for someone who appreciates facts more than unfounded impressions?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<abbr title="Sisterhooves Social">ss</abbr> well as//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The lavender unicorn//</span><br />Why do you keep referring to them with these descriptors? He knows who they are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wrily//</span><br />wryly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Oh, boy&quot;,//</span><br />Comma goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she laughed in response. - “Give me back my shako”!//</span><br />Exclamation mark goes inside the quotes, too. And what is that hyphen doing there? As she continues to talk, you don&#039;t have her speech in quotes, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bearers//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at capitalizing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“And he hit me!” Rainbow Dash seconded her. “Let me at him!”//</span><br />Missing a bunch of line breaks in this area.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Press gang//</span><br />I&#039;m not familiar with this term. Did you mean something like a compulsory draft?<br /><br />The story itself is fine, aside from the inexplicable use of canon characters in decidedly out-of-character ways. I can&#039;t help but think it would have worked with a cast of original characters, but forcing the Elements into roles that don&#039;t suit them… really, only Rainbow Dash was believable. Beyond that, this story needs a lot of editing help. There are just a whole lot of very basic and inconsistent errors.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 140

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Existentialism//

Book titles should be underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>I watched ten page unfold at the speed I usually read at//

Typo and a redundant "at."

>Myself and the child are so very similar in this respect//

Misused reflexive pronoun. They don'y work this way—they aren't nominative case.

>it makes me ask more questions; not about the way things are//

Misused semicolon. There isn't an independent clause anywhere after it.

>She sniffled a bit and went up to room//

Missing word.

>By the time that one kicked I could feel a trembling in my hoof//

Another missing word.

>upset stomachs fatigues me//

Typo.

>Feeling rested enough//

I notice you go without commas after introductory elements, and they're really not required. But you should do so with most participles, even elsewhere in a sentence.

>more emotional of a pony than me//

Comparatives are in nominal case—"than I."

>let my imagination get the better me and actually imagined//

Watch the word repetition.

>Long married//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>unsaid rule said//

Close enough to word repetition that it feels clunky, somewhat also because of the apparent contradiction.

>she is so much farther than reality than I am//

Typo.

>Everyone will be too polite to give her anything but compliment//

Typo.

>She got all sorts compliments//

Missing word.

>out-dated//

I've now noticed a few unnecessarily hyphenated words like outdated and coworkers.

>it irk's me//

Get rid of that apostrophe.

>the sort of pony who humours them and lie//

Typo.

>and my I don't have an absolute meaning//

Some wording got jumbled there.

I really liked this story. That should be evident from the small number of things I found wrong with it. There are a fre more, though. First, have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. I noticed quite a few missing commas from dependent clauses.

Second, you make one or two brief mentions of Sweetie Belle, but I found her strangely absent from the story. I realize that canon is vague about how much time she actually spends at Rarity's, but the implication is that their parents live nearby, since she goes to school there. Kids are good at picking up on when adults are acting differently. I'd think she'd notice. Sure, you may deal with her in later chapters, but I have to think she wouldn't have let it go this long without saying something. And sure, Rarity's not noecessarily mentioning everything that happens to her each day, but that seems like the kind of thing she'd remember.

Do you intend these chapter titles to actually mean these occur a month apart? Because that would be a huge amount of time between a death and a funeral. And with respect to the funeral… Rarity never mentions her mother at all. As distanced as she is from her own feelings, she still seems to be pretty well in touch with others', so why no observations on her mother? And why is her mother never placed at the funeral, or a visit beforehand, or anything at all?

Next issue: You have a ton of "to be" verbs in here. They're boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. Even for descriptions where you use one of these verbs, it's usually possible to recast it with an active verb, and you do so in some places. I get that the use of so many "to be" verbs can create a stagnant feel, and maybe intentionally so, but that's getting across enough in what Rarity says; you don't need it reflected so much in how she says it. I tend to give you some leeway in maintaining this mood, but that only goes so far.

Maybe you meant for it to be this subtle, but it seems to me that Twilight started out trying to get Rarity interested in things that interested her, but when Rarity didn't take to it, then Twilight shifted to taking on Rarity's interests. But there's never a part where Rarity actually discusses the philosophy book with Twilight, so I feel more like I'm completely inventing that. Even so, it's a nice subtext you might consider making clearer.

In a first-person narration, there's an implied audience. Normally, that can just be swept under the rug, but depending on the delivery, it sometimes begs the question of who's listening and why (and some scholars will assert this is always the case). Because of the somewhat conversational tone taken and the way these are dated, it does make me question this more than many other such fics would. So I have to ask: Are these journal entries? If not, why does she want to say these things, and whom does she want to hear them?

I'd encourage you to put in the occasional moment of happiness or levity. Effective sad stories work in contrasts. By interspersing lighter moments (or in some stories, action scenes), you make the sad moments stand out and prevent the reader from becoming inured to them.

Lastly, it's not at all clear where this story is going, and I'd feel more comfortable about it if I had more chapters to work with or a brief summary of your intended plot.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Existentialism//</span><br />Book titles should be underlined or (preferably) italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I watched ten page unfold at the speed I usually read at//</span><br />Typo and a redundant &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Myself and the child are so very similar in this respect//</span><br />Misused reflexive pronoun. They don&#039;y work this way—they aren&#039;t nominative case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it makes me ask more questions; not about the way things are//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There isn&#039;t an independent clause anywhere after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sniffled a bit and went up to room//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;By the time that one kicked I could feel a trembling in my hoof//</span><br />Another missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;upset stomachs fatigues me//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Feeling rested enough//</span><br />I notice you go without commas after introductory elements, and they&#039;re really not required. But you should do so with most participles, even elsewhere in a sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;more emotional of a pony than me//</span><br />Comparatives are in nominal case—&quot;than I.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;let my imagination get the better me and actually imagined//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Long married//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unsaid rule said//</span><br />Close enough to word repetition that it feels clunky, somewhat also because of the apparent contradiction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she is so much farther than reality than I am//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everyone will be too polite to give her anything but compliment//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She got all sorts compliments//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;out-dated//</span><br />I&#039;ve now noticed a few unnecessarily hyphenated words like outdated and coworkers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it irk&#039;s me//</span><br />Get rid of that apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the sort of pony who humours them and lie//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and my I don&#039;t have an absolute meaning//</span><br />Some wording got jumbled there.<br /><br />I really liked this story. That should be evident from the small number of things I found wrong with it. There are a fre more, though. First, have a look at the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. I noticed quite a few missing commas from dependent clauses.<br /><br />Second, you make one or two brief mentions of Sweetie Belle, but I found her strangely absent from the story. I realize that canon is vague about how much time she actually spends at Rarity&#039;s, but the implication is that their parents live nearby, since she goes to school there. Kids are good at picking up on when adults are acting differently. I&#039;d think she&#039;d notice. Sure, you may deal with her in later chapters, but I have to think she wouldn&#039;t have let it go this long without saying something. And sure, Rarity&#039;s not noecessarily mentioning everything that happens to her each day, but that seems like the kind of thing she&#039;d remember. <br /><br />Do you intend these chapter titles to actually mean these occur a month apart? Because that would be a huge amount of time between a death and a funeral. And with respect to the funeral… Rarity never mentions her mother at all. As distanced as she is from her own feelings, she still seems to be pretty well in touch with others&#039;, so why no observations on her mother? And why is her mother never placed at the funeral, or a visit beforehand, or anything at all?<br /><br />Next issue: You have a ton of &quot;to be&quot; verbs in here. They&#039;re boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. Even for descriptions where you use one of these verbs, it&#039;s usually possible to recast it with an active verb, and you do so in some places. I get that the use of so many &quot;to be&quot; verbs can create a stagnant feel, and maybe intentionally so, but that&#039;s getting across enough in what Rarity says; you don&#039;t need it reflected so much in how she says it. I tend to give you some leeway in maintaining this mood, but that only goes so far.<br /><br />Maybe you meant for it to be this subtle, but it seems to me that Twilight started out trying to get Rarity interested in things that interested her, but when Rarity didn&#039;t take to it, then Twilight shifted to taking on Rarity&#039;s interests. But there&#039;s never a part where Rarity actually discusses the philosophy book with Twilight, so I feel more like I&#039;m completely inventing that. Even so, it&#039;s a nice subtext you might consider making clearer.<br /><br />In a first-person narration, there&#039;s an implied audience. Normally, that can just be swept under the rug, but depending on the delivery, it sometimes begs the question of who&#039;s listening and why (and some scholars will assert this is always the case). Because of the somewhat conversational tone taken and the way these are dated, it does make me question this more than many other such fics would. So I have to ask: Are these journal entries? If not, why does she want to say these things, and whom does she want to hear them?<br /><br />I&#039;d encourage you to put in the occasional moment of happiness or levity. Effective sad stories work in contrasts. By interspersing lighter moments (or in some stories, action scenes), you make the sad moments stand out and prevent the reader from becoming inured to them.<br /><br />Lastly, it&#039;s not at all clear where this story is going, and I&#039;d feel more comfortable about it if I had more chapters to work with or a brief summary of your intended plot.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 141

>There are no books, however, so she moves down to the next shelf.//
Given that she's specifically looking for books, why is she wasting her time with this?

>the spines have large words she can't pronounce//

Comma here.

>She takes this as a small victory.//

This paragraph is coming across a little bland, and the sentence structures are a bit repetitive.

>as if just now realizing she'd been addressed//

Just used "realize" a few sentences back.

>The spine is open//

Comma here.

>She moves down one more shelf, and is greeted with what she's looking for.//

No comma this time.

>psyche//

In this sense, "psych."

>What better place to store a journal than desk?//

Missing word.

>something or other//

Should probably hyphenate this.

>Pinkie likely does not hear her.//

Why not? I suppose I'll find out when we get to her part, but for now, it just leaves the picture incomplete, and without an apparent point.

>Behind them is a metal flask that she leaves alone, and another picture frame, that she removes.//

Nitpick, but you're using non-restrictive clauses here, so you really should have "which" instead of "that" for both of them.

>Rarity is right, it is actually quite warm and snug in here.//

Splice.

>Well, I didn't think to bring anything with me. I thought about it//

Aren't these contradictory?

>Twilight makes the noise that means "please stop talking right now before I burst into flames".//

This period can go inside the quotes.

>It's a really fascinating, original sort of the sound.//

Extraneous word.

>one hundred and seventy//

Someone like Twilight would know not to put the "and" in there.

>She regrets that she hasn't kept in touch with him //

Given that he's gone, shouldn't this be a "hadn't"?

>This won't do, she'll have to sort them out by date.//

Splice.

>The vase flowers//

Missing a word.

>Theoretically, they could be flipping through books all day trying to find the right one.//

Well, she estimated two hundred books. That wouldn't take so long.

>Great.//

Your narrator has been very dispassionate through the whole thing. While you did take on a little bit of personal voice for each of their sections, Pinkie's was the only one that sounded conversational, so this feels a little out of place, unless you want to do more of it.

>I can't even begin to imagine just important all of this work is!//

Missing word.

>Every iteration had small differences, and over the last half dozen, I was able to implant suggestions that would echo through into future loops, so we'd know to stop Pinkie from messing with it!//

There is a ST:TNG episode almost exactly like this… And a guest appearance from Kelsey Grammer. Do you have one of those too?

I kind of found myself wanting the cutoffs for each section to have a dash. And the allusions to Spike, Shining Armor, and Cadence don't make much sense. I get that these time loops may have gad a far-reaching effect, but now that they've stopped, what danger is Spike in anymore? I just don't get what Twilight is going to save him from. It's always hard to decide what to do with Pinkie in a serious story like this. She does have a strange mindset about things, but she also knows when to knock it off. You probably don't have any choice put to put her part last, but her attitude in it changed the tone of the story. Dash's part was fairly light, but then we eased into more serious treatment from the next three, which handled the themes well. They all had thoughts wandering around how they'd react to a similar situation. Well, Fluttershy didn't, but she still responded reasonably to the pervading atmosphere. Then we get to Pinkie, and it suddenly turns into a fun story, and then right back again when we get to Twilight. Then the story ends on an underwhelming note, what with the cryptic remark about Spike, Twilight's somewhat muted reaction to the loops' end (well, maybe not on her part, but it's certainly not contagious), and the lack of some pithy statement at the end kind of kept there from being a real conclusion. But I enjoyed reading it, and it was interesting to see how all the different perspectives interconnect. Based on what Twilight said, I guess each of them was supposed to have some sight difference? If so, I missed that. And was I right in thinking that Pinkie was somehow immune to the effect and realized how many times she'd been through the loop?<span class="unkfunc">&gt;There are no books, however, so she moves down to the next shelf.//</span><br />Given that she&#039;s specifically looking for books, why is she wasting her time with this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the spines have large words she can&#039;t pronounce//</span><br />Comma here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She takes this as a small victory.//</span><br />This paragraph is coming across a little bland, and the sentence structures are a bit repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as if just now realizing she&#039;d been addressed//</span><br />Just used &quot;realize&quot; a few sentences back.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The spine is open//</span><br />Comma here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She moves down one more shelf, and is greeted with what she&#039;s looking for.//</span><br />No comma this time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;psyche//</span><br />In this sense, &quot;psych.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What better place to store a journal than desk?//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something or other//</span><br />Should probably hyphenate this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie likely does not hear her.//</span><br />Why not? I suppose I&#039;ll find out when we get to her part, but for now, it just leaves the picture incomplete, and without an apparent point.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Behind them is a metal flask that she leaves alone, and another picture frame, that she removes.//</span><br />Nitpick, but you&#039;re using non-restrictive clauses here, so you really should have &quot;which&quot; instead of &quot;that&quot; for both of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity is right, it is actually quite warm and snug in here.//</span><br />Splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well, I didn&#039;t think to bring anything with me. I thought about it//</span><br />Aren&#039;t these contradictory?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight makes the noise that means &quot;please stop talking right now before I burst into flames&quot;.//</span><br />This period can go inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s a really fascinating, original sort of the sound.//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one hundred and seventy//</span><br />Someone like Twilight would know not to put the &quot;and&quot; in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She regrets that she hasn&#039;t kept in touch with him //</span><br />Given that he&#039;s gone, shouldn&#039;t this be a &quot;hadn&#039;t&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This won&#039;t do, she&#039;ll have to sort them out by date.//</span><br />Splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The vase flowers//</span><br />Missing a word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Theoretically, they could be flipping through books all day trying to find the right one.//</span><br />Well, she estimated two hundred books. That wouldn&#039;t take so long.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Great.//</span><br />Your narrator has been very dispassionate through the whole thing. While you did take on a little bit of personal voice for each of their sections, Pinkie&#039;s was the only one that sounded conversational, so this feels a little out of place, unless you want to do more of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can&#039;t even begin to imagine just important all of this work is!//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Every iteration had small differences, and over the last half dozen, I was able to implant suggestions that would echo through into future loops, so we&#039;d know to stop Pinkie from messing with it!//</span><br />There is a ST:TNG episode almost exactly like this… And a guest appearance from Kelsey Grammer. Do you have one of those too?<br /><br />I kind of found myself wanting the cutoffs for each section to have a dash. And the allusions to Spike, Shining Armor, and Cadence don&#039;t make much sense. I get that these time loops may have gad a far-reaching effect, but now that they&#039;ve stopped, what danger is Spike in anymore? I just don&#039;t get what Twilight is going to save him from. It&#039;s always hard to decide what to do with Pinkie in a serious story like this. She does have a strange mindset about things, but she also knows when to knock it off. You probably don&#039;t have any choice put to put her part last, but her attitude in it changed the tone of the story. Dash&#039;s part was fairly light, but then we eased into more serious treatment from the next three, which handled the themes well. They all had thoughts wandering around how they&#039;d react to a similar situation. Well, Fluttershy didn&#039;t, but she still responded reasonably to the pervading atmosphere. Then we get to Pinkie, and it suddenly turns into a fun story, and then right back again when we get to Twilight. Then the story ends on an underwhelming note, what with the cryptic remark about Spike, Twilight&#039;s somewhat muted reaction to the loops&#039; end (well, maybe not on her part, but it&#039;s certainly not contagious), and the lack of some pithy statement at the end kind of kept there from being a real conclusion. But I enjoyed reading it, and it was interesting to see how all the different perspectives interconnect. Based on what Twilight said, I guess each of them was supposed to have some sight difference? If so, I missed that. And was I right in thinking that Pinkie was somehow immune to the effect and realized how many times she&#039;d been through the loop?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 142

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>(and a single stir counter-clockwise, just to be sure)//

This would work better simply set off with commas. Parenthetical elements really do better when in first-person or sometimes a very deep third-person limited, where there's a very informal and conversational narrator. This narration is a bit formal for that.

>woops//

Whoops

>Twilight giggled as her horn shined bright//

"Shined" is what you did to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

>She felt a slight chill that morning//

This is a finished action in the story's timeline, so use past perfect tense: "had felt."

>with a bored expression. Casually//

Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. We'll see if it's a pervasive problem. It hasn't been so far, and this isn't an instance of high emotion where it'd normally bother me, but right at the beginning of the story, it's important to forge a connection between the reader and your characters, and showing is the way to do that.

>As Twilight passed by him to creep onto her own bed,//

This is already the fifth "as" clause I've seen. You're creating a repetitive feel early on, and even if that doesn't keep up, it's the impression I have now. You also use quite a few participles, which have their own associated dangers. I'll point out if you fall into any of the usual traps.

>finishing a scroll for the Saddle Arabian ambassador. “Did you ever finish//

Watch repeating a word in a close space like this.

>feel for//

Extraneous space.

>Once he was sure it was the right one//

Be careful. Your narrator's been in Twilight's perspective so far. Just look at how often he makes personal comments for her. But this statement is in Spike's point of view. Unless you give me evidence of how she'd know this, it's in his head. Read the section on head hopping to see the rationale on when and how to change perspective.

>breaking the jewels//

Really, cloth would break long before the jewels would. I'm not sure what her concern is.

>I thought she might an exception//

Missing word.

>You didn’t..?//

You still need the three full dots for the ellipsis.

>Not many ponies would go that for a simple gift//

Typo, and the "not many ponies" is a little out of place, considering that she's not talking to one.

>Twilight fidgeted, Spike’s tone was sincere.//

Comma splice.

>Rarity’s the generous one, I’m just a baby dragon.//

Another splice.

>masterly-woven//

In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are generally exempt from hyphenation.

>whatever foundation laid underneath Rarity’s hooves//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Glancing at the clock, she noticed she was late.//

Here's one of the dangers I noted about participles. They connote simultaneous action, but she wouldn't do both of these at the same time. She'd first glance at the clock and then realize she was late.

>present her presents//

More clunky repetition.

>Rarity facehoofed, a massive impact on her face.//

This is… really strange. I'm not sure yet what the importance of all the rhyming is, but you're forcing some weird phrasings and word choices to accomplish it.

>her celebrations discrete//

Surely you meant "discreet."

>Except today, of course, but alas.//

Rhyming "alas" with "rash"? For shame.

>Rarity gasped, becoming quite aghast. “Surely you’re joking, the storm’s come to pass!//

Two things: Why is Rarity's curse forcing others to speak in rhyme as well? And how does that curse carry over to the narration? I could see if this were a first-person narration, such that the narration was still an internal dialogue. But it's not, so she wouldn't be aware of the narration. How then would she rhyme with it? It could even work if the narration and dialogue both rhymed, but you made sure never to require the rhyme to cross from one to the other.

>Rainbow said, her wings twitched in agitation.//

That's either a splice or a verb form error.

>quick as a volt//

Did you mean "bolt"? Because a volt implies nothing about speed.

>Rarity did not want try-//

Missing word. I can't figure out why the dash is necessary, but in any case, please use a proper one and not a hyphen.

>No one could stop her, not even Pan.//

What in the world would Pan have to do with any of this?

>until the dishes gleaned//

"Gleamed," yes?

>Twilight paused with an introspective spark. An idea formed, the creative’s spark.//

And you're going to rhyme "spark" with… "spark." Hm.

>To be honest Rarity, your gift is touching//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>Daring Doo//

Do

>Druish//

What in the world is this? A Spaceballs reference?

I have to commend you for keeping up rhymes for that long. But poetry is something that has to stand out even more for us to accept it, and this relies too much on questionable rhymes and forced word choices/phrasings that sacrifice meaning. You really can't compromise there—you have to do both, and while that's especially difficult, such is the nature of the vehicle you've chosen. I'm also unclear as to what brings on Rarity's part of the story. Would it have happened anyway, or was it caused by Spike's act of generosity toward her? The structure of the story seems to favor the latter, but it's very unclear.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(and a single stir counter-clockwise, just to be sure)//</span><br />This would work better simply set off with commas. Parenthetical elements really do better when in first-person or sometimes a very deep third-person limited, where there&#039;s a very informal and conversational narrator. This narration is a bit formal for that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;woops//</span><br />Whoops<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight giggled as her horn shined bright//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is what you did to brass or shoes. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt a slight chill that morning//</span><br />This is a finished action in the story&#039;s timeline, so use past perfect tense: &quot;had felt.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a bored expression. Casually//</span><br />Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. We&#039;ll see if it&#039;s a pervasive problem. It hasn&#039;t been so far, and this isn&#039;t an instance of high emotion where it&#039;d normally bother me, but right at the beginning of the story, it&#039;s important to forge a connection between the reader and your characters, and showing is the way to do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As Twilight passed by him to creep onto her own bed,//</span><br />This is already the fifth &quot;as&quot; clause I&#039;ve seen. You&#039;re creating a repetitive feel early on, and even if that doesn&#039;t keep up, it&#039;s the impression I have now. You also use quite a few participles, which have their own associated dangers. I&#039;ll point out if you fall into any of the usual traps.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;finishing a scroll for the Saddle Arabian ambassador. “Did you ever finish//</span><br />Watch repeating a word in a close space like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;feel for//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once he was sure it was the right one//</span><br />Be careful. Your narrator&#039;s been in Twilight&#039;s perspective so far. Just look at how often he makes personal comments for her. But this statement is in Spike&#039;s point of view. Unless you give me evidence of how she&#039;d know this, it&#039;s in his head. Read the section on head hopping to see the rationale on when and how to change perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;breaking the jewels//</span><br />Really, cloth would break long before the jewels would. I&#039;m not sure what her concern is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I thought she might an exception//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You didn’t..?//</span><br />You still need the three full dots for the ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not many ponies would go that for a simple gift//</span><br />Typo, and the &quot;not many ponies&quot; is a little out of place, considering that she&#039;s not talking to one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight fidgeted, Spike’s tone was sincere.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s the generous one, I’m just a baby dragon.//</span><br />Another splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;masterly-woven//</span><br />In two-word phrases, -ly adverbs are generally exempt from hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whatever foundation laid underneath Rarity’s hooves//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Glancing at the clock, she noticed she was late.//</span><br />Here&#039;s one of the dangers I noted about participles. They connote simultaneous action, but she wouldn&#039;t do both of these at the same time. She&#039;d first glance at the clock and then realize she was late.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;present her presents//</span><br />More clunky repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity facehoofed, a massive impact on her face.//</span><br />This is… really strange. I&#039;m not sure yet what the importance of all the rhyming is, but you&#039;re forcing some weird phrasings and word choices to accomplish it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her celebrations discrete//</span><br />Surely you meant &quot;discreet.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Except today, of course, but alas.//</span><br />Rhyming &quot;alas&quot; with &quot;rash&quot;? For shame.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity gasped, becoming quite aghast. “Surely you’re joking, the storm’s come to pass!//</span><br />Two things: Why is Rarity&#039;s curse forcing others to speak in rhyme as well? And how does that curse carry over to the narration? I could see if this were a first-person narration, such that the narration was still an internal dialogue. But it&#039;s not, so she wouldn&#039;t be aware of the narration. How then would she rhyme with it? It could even work if the narration and dialogue both rhymed, but you made sure never to require the rhyme to cross from one to the other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow said, her wings twitched in agitation.//</span><br />That&#039;s either a splice or a verb form error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quick as a volt//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;bolt&quot;? Because a volt implies nothing about speed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity did not want try-//</span><br />Missing word. I can&#039;t figure out why the dash is necessary, but in any case, please use a proper one and not a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No one could stop her, not even Pan.//</span><br />What in the world would Pan have to do with any of this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;until the dishes gleaned//</span><br />&quot;Gleamed,&quot; yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight paused with an introspective spark. An idea formed, the creative’s spark.//</span><br />And you&#039;re going to rhyme &quot;spark&quot; with… &quot;spark.&quot; Hm.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To be honest Rarity, your gift is touching//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Daring Doo//</span><br />Do<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Druish//</span><br />What in the world is this? A Spaceballs reference?<br /><br />I have to commend you for keeping up rhymes for that long. But poetry is something that has to stand out even more for us to accept it, and this relies too much on questionable rhymes and forced word choices/phrasings that sacrifice meaning. You really can&#039;t compromise there—you have to do both, and while that&#039;s especially difficult, such is the nature of the vehicle you&#039;ve chosen. I&#039;m also unclear as to what brings on Rarity&#039;s part of the story. Would it have happened anyway, or was it caused by Spike&#039;s act of generosity toward her? The structure of the story seems to favor the latter, but it&#039;s very unclear.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 143

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
First, having so many quick-hit paragraphs here creates a feel that you don't have anything organized or significant to say, since you're relying on an artificial sense of urgency to create interest. Just say what the story's about. That's all that's required. It's also pretty cliched to ask rhetorical questions here.

Story:
>But,//
Most commas after conjunctions aren't used correctly. This one is also not.

>Even with her gasping wails of pure distort//

I'm not sure what word you were going for there, but "distort" doesn't work.

>it became apparent//

It became apparent to whom? Me? Not so—I'm relying on you to tell me. The narrator? I have no idea who he is? Pinkie? She seems to know already. You have to be careful when communicating impressions or opinions that we know who is expressing them.

>stuttering for breath//

I assume you meant "sputtering"?

>Sugercube//

Sugarcube

>the door garble//

I'm guessing you meant "gable"?

>She prodded at the brown fibbers in the welcome mat.//

"Fibers," I guess? There are far too many spelling errors already.

>producing a crestfallen expression//

Don't just tell me she's crestfallen. Describe her appearance and show me her actions such that I concluded it on my own.

>unicorn//

If you're not going to capitalize all the races, don't capitalize any. Your use of "Pegasus" earlier would then refer specifically to the one from Greek mythology.

>rain saturated//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>It was weird because make-up was top priority to Rarity, now it just reminded her of how “frivolous” she was.//

Comma splice.

>Tip-toeing slowly, the weeping grew louder//

Dangling participle. Who's tiptoeing? The sentence doesn't say. This explicitly states that the weeping is tiptoeing.

>She soon realised that Rarity was extremely light on her hooves.//

Why are you shifting perspectives? Not that it can't be done, but you have to carefully consider it. Read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread to get the rationale.

>she informed//

This verb requires a direct object.

>“Oh yes, the pony who makes everypony in town happy is “a nuisance”,”//

When nesting quotes inside other quotes, use single quotation marks.

>I’m I important//

Extraneous word.

>complemented//

Compliment/complement confusion.

>Pinkie’s eye’s reflected the brightest of blues//

Misused apostrophe.

>She hesitated, lying to Pinkie wouldn’t achieve anything//

You don't capitalize these interjected asides, unless the first word is one that has to be capitalized anyway.

>T-that’s//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated.

You're a little on the vague side here, but you're kind of falling into the most common trap of shipping stories: you just throw the two ponies together and expect me to already have a prefabricated investment in the pair. The challenge of shipping is to make the pairing feel natural and authentic. That means demonstrating the=at they have real chemistry together and (usually) giving evidence of the development of that relationship rather than dropping me into the middle of it. You do some things right along these lines, like relating Rarity's thoughts about how she's enjoyed watching Pinkie hop by her boutique these past years, and that they didn't go to Sugarcube Corner together with the intent of having a romantic encounter. So you're on the right track there, but as to the good and bad, you're drawing a little from column A and a little from column B. You have to be very cautious in presenting this relationship so that it feels authentic instead of unjustified. Aside from that, this story has lots of basic editing problems, like misused words and others substituted for others with similar spellings.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br />First, having so many quick-hit paragraphs here creates a feel that you don&#039;t have anything organized or significant to say, since you&#039;re relying on an artificial sense of urgency to create interest. Just say what the story&#039;s about. That&#039;s all that&#039;s required. It&#039;s also pretty cliched to ask rhetorical questions here.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But,//</span><br />Most commas after conjunctions aren&#039;t used correctly. This one is also not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even with her gasping wails of pure distort//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure what word you were going for there, but &quot;distort&quot; doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it became apparent//</span><br />It became apparent to whom? Me? Not so—I&#039;m relying on you to tell me. The narrator? I have no idea who he is? Pinkie? She seems to know already. You have to be careful when communicating impressions or opinions that we know who is expressing them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stuttering for breath//</span><br />I assume you meant &quot;sputtering&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sugercube//</span><br />Sugarcube<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the door garble//</span><br />I&#039;m guessing you meant &quot;gable&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She prodded at the brown fibbers in the welcome mat.//</span><br />&quot;Fibers,&quot; I guess? There are far too many spelling errors already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;producing a crestfallen expression//</span><br />Don&#039;t just tell me she&#039;s crestfallen. Describe her appearance and show me her actions such that I concluded it on my own.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unicorn//</span><br />If you&#039;re not going to capitalize all the races, don&#039;t capitalize any. Your use of &quot;Pegasus&quot; earlier would then refer specifically to the one from Greek mythology.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rain saturated//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was weird because make-up was top priority to Rarity, now it just reminded her of how “frivolous” she was.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tip-toeing slowly, the weeping grew louder//</span><br />Dangling participle. Who&#039;s tiptoeing? The sentence doesn&#039;t say. This explicitly states that the weeping is tiptoeing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She soon realised that Rarity was extremely light on her hooves.//</span><br />Why are you shifting perspectives? Not that it can&#039;t be done, but you have to carefully consider it. Read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread to get the rationale.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she informed//</span><br />This verb requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh yes, the pony who makes everypony in town happy is “a nuisance”,”//</span><br />When nesting quotes inside other quotes, use single quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m I important//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;complemented//</span><br />Compliment/complement confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie’s eye’s reflected the brightest of blues//</span><br />Misused apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She hesitated, lying to Pinkie wouldn’t achieve anything//</span><br />You don&#039;t capitalize these interjected asides, unless the first word is one that has to be capitalized anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-that’s//</span><br />Think about what sound would actually be repeated.<br /><br />You&#039;re a little on the vague side here, but you&#039;re kind of falling into the most common trap of shipping stories: you just throw the two ponies together and expect me to already have a prefabricated investment in the pair. The challenge of shipping is to make the pairing feel natural and authentic. That means demonstrating the=at they have real chemistry together and (usually) giving evidence of the development of that relationship rather than dropping me into the middle of it. You do some things right along these lines, like relating Rarity&#039;s thoughts about how she&#039;s enjoyed watching Pinkie hop by her boutique these past years, and that they didn&#039;t go to Sugarcube Corner together with the intent of having a romantic encounter. So you&#039;re on the right track there, but as to the good and bad, you&#039;re drawing a little from column A and a little from column B. You have to be very cautious in presenting this relationship so that it feels authentic instead of unjustified. Aside from that, this story has lots of basic editing problems, like misused words and others substituted for others with similar spellings.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 144

>>129776

(Regarding the story discussed here: >>129746)

Resubmitted and requested you as the pre-reader. Thank you for all the feedback!
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129776" onclick="return highlight('129776', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129776">&gt;&gt;129776</a><br /><br />(Regarding the story discussed here: <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129746" onclick="return highlight('129746', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129746">&gt;&gt;129746</a>)<br /><br />Resubmitted and requested you as the pre-reader. Thank you for all the feedback!<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Mar 10th, 2014 03:30</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 145

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
Nothing's wrong with it per se, but it's completely quick-hit, one-line paragraphs. Such things are done to stand out, and when everything stands out, nothing does. It's a little of an eyesore.

On the title:
This can work as an overall title, as long as it fits the story. However, I have to say it's odd to see it as the title of the first chapter as well, for two reasons. First, you gnerally only see the story title repeated as a chapter title when there's only one chapter. Second, and interlude, by definition, comes between other things, not first.

>but still winter, nonetheless//

"still" and "nonetheless" are redundant here.

Your second paragraph, and the first one of any length, contains seven "to be" verbs. I suspect this will be an ongoing issue, but you definitely don't want to overload on them here, where you're trying to grab the reader's interest. They're boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs.

>the conductor stated, flatly//

No reason for that comma to be there.

The conductor gave a noncommittal harrumph, and gently shook his leg free of Octavia's grasp.//
Don't put sound effects in narration. It's a valid word anyway. Just use it without the italics, put it in quotes, or describe the sound instead. Also see the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.

>hurriedly made her way back to her hooves//

That's different than having her stand up. This means hat her hooves are elsewhere, and she's going over to them.

>Her cheeks burned as she dragged it along the ground//

Surely she can carry it on her back…

>the case had been so heavy that she could barely lift it//

Really? They're not that heavy, and she's an earth pony, after all.

>ARE YOU A CHANGELING!?//

Okay. This is one of the most common things people do wrong in letters, particularly when the entire story is letters. They put things in a letter that are unreasonable for the format. People have plenty of time to plan what they want to write in a letter. I can buy single-word strikethroughs for misspellings and the like, but an entire sentence? Pinkie wouldn't have needed to change her mind about writing this. I could even let it go as a childish thing with her, but you've explicitly stated erasure marks on the paper. If she's erasing things, why would she strike things through? It doesn't add up.

I'm also noting that nearly every sentence in the letter ends in an exclamation mark. See my comments on the synopsis. The same thing applies. Exclamation marks make things stand out and overusing them defeats the purpose.

>Blinkie//

Well, I'll go ahead and say that they've kind of been given names now (Limestone and Granite), though that's comic canon, and I won't hold you to it.

>treble clef//

Her cutie mark is actually closer to an ampersand. And it's ironic that she plays an instrument that doesn't read treble clef… but I digress.

>“Cello,” Octavia murmured.//

They're both right. The old-fashioned long name is violincello.

>Not again. Not out here in public, where everypony can see you.//

Like where nobody's standing around on the platform or paying attention to her? You certainly haven't painted the picture of a busy area, anyway. By the way, I'm well over the five-minute mark on reading this letter. The train should have left already…

I also have to ask how they could give her a middle name of Octavia and not know what a treble clef is, given how prescient their naming schemes seem to be. For that matter, she has the longer name of "Octavia Melody" in the merchandising.

>she bit back her fury, and her anguish, and her astonishing self-loathing//

This is coming on all of a sudden, and without any evidence. You seem like an experienced enough writer to understand "show versus tell." (There's a section up top about that too, if you need a refresher.) You don't want to dump all this defining information about her in the form of a tell. That's not going to get me invested in her character.

>Her work at the symphony paid virtually nothing//

Top musicians actually earn a comfortable living. I have to think Canterlot would have one of the leading orchestras, and with her being a valedictorian, she should be able to live comfortably.

>then we sat around and smoked weed the rest of the night//

Just so you know, use of real-world drugs is against EqD policy.

>However, the idea never really gained a lot of traction//

You really think so? The idea is actually quite common.

>blighted plot of land like a great, graying wound upon the earth//

Alright, now you've got a character voicing problem. Vinyl holds your perspective here, and this word choice and phrasing plain doesn't work for the personality you've established for her. Unless the bad-girl stuff is just a front over an intelligent interior, but you've given me no evidence of that. If your narrator's in her point of view, then he needs to sound at least in the ballpark of what she might say in terms of vocabulary and phrasing.

>Celestia's light//

This is one of the most cliched phrasings in the fandom.

>But Octavia seemed to know exactly where she was going//

And Vinyl should know exactly why she does…

>along the way, they hadn't so much as glimpsed another living soul//

You already said as much.

>reacquainting herself with the scent of the place//

Why are you popping back into Octavia's head for the grand total of one sentence?

>She was quiet, for a moment//

Why is that comma there?

>S'not//

Consider where the missing letter actually is. 'S not.

Oh yeah, so Octavia could barely lift her cello at the train station, but now she's having not trouble traipsing through the woods with it?

>S'your//

Same deal as before.

>It's you! It's really you!//

This whole paragraph is not a good idea. One or two lines, sure, but this kind of thing gets old fast.

>sis//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>desperate bawling//

Less is often more in emotional moments. If you go over the top, it loses its power.

>the dark, raging waters of her soul//

Yeah, you're getting really maudlin here.

The perspective's really wavering a lot here at the end. You might want to read the section on head hopping, too.

These would be my main laundry list of issues: commas, appropriate narrative voicing, consistent perspective, some melodrama, some telly language, and overload of "to be" verbs. And lose the drug reference.

This story's also pretty weak on the conflict. It was pretty obvious from the beginning of Pinkie's letter that we'd get to this point, and we already knew that Pinkie was accepting of her. And Octavia was willing to go meet Pinkie, or she wouldn't have been at the train station in the first place. So there was no question that this moment would arrive. The real conflict that had been dangled in front of my face was how Octavia would relate to the rest of her family, and… we never get to see that. I really get everything I can from the story within the first few pages. It plays as a nice series of scenes, but there's not really a story there.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br />Nothing&#039;s wrong with it per se, but it&#039;s completely quick-hit, one-line paragraphs. Such things are done to stand out, and when everything stands out, nothing does. It&#039;s a little of an eyesore.<br /><br />On the title:<br />This can work as an overall title, as long as it fits the story. However, I have to say it&#039;s odd to see it as the title of the first chapter as well, for two reasons. First, you gnerally only see the story title repeated as a chapter title when there&#039;s only one chapter. Second, and interlude, by definition, comes between other things, not first.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but still winter, nonetheless//</span><br />&quot;still&quot; and &quot;nonetheless&quot; are redundant here.<br /><br />Your second paragraph, and the first one of any length, contains seven &quot;to be&quot; verbs. I suspect this will be an ongoing issue, but you definitely don&#039;t want to overload on them here, where you&#039;re trying to grab the reader&#039;s interest. They&#039;re boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the conductor stated, flatly//</span><br />No reason for that comma to be there.<br /><br />The conductor gave a noncommittal <i>harrumph</i>, and gently shook his leg free of Octavia&#039;s grasp.//<br />Don&#039;t put sound effects in narration. It&#039;s a valid word anyway. Just use it without the italics, put it in quotes, or describe the sound instead. Also see the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hurriedly made her way back to her hooves//</span><br />That&#039;s different than having her stand up. This means hat her hooves are elsewhere, and she&#039;s going over to them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her cheeks burned as she dragged it along the ground//</span><br />Surely she can carry it on her back…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the case had been so heavy that she could barely lift it//</span><br />Really? They&#039;re not that heavy, and she&#039;s an earth pony, after all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ARE YOU A CHANGELING!?//</span><br />Okay. This is one of the most common things people do wrong in letters, particularly when the entire story is letters. They put things in a letter that are unreasonable for the format. People have plenty of time to plan what they want to write in a letter. I can buy single-word strikethroughs for misspellings and the like, but an entire sentence? Pinkie wouldn&#039;t have needed to change her mind about writing this. I could even let it go as a childish thing with her, but you&#039;ve explicitly stated erasure marks on the paper. If she&#039;s erasing things, why would she strike things through? It doesn&#039;t add up.<br /><br />I&#039;m also noting that nearly every sentence in the letter ends in an exclamation mark. See my comments on the synopsis. The same thing applies. Exclamation marks make things stand out and overusing them defeats the purpose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Blinkie//</span><br />Well, I&#039;ll go ahead and say that they&#039;ve kind of been given names now (Limestone and Granite), though that&#039;s comic canon, and I won&#039;t hold you to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;treble clef//</span><br />Her cutie mark is actually closer to an ampersand. And it&#039;s ironic that she plays an instrument that doesn&#039;t read treble clef… but I digress.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Cello,” Octavia murmured.//</span><br />They&#039;re both right. The old-fashioned long name is violincello.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not again. Not out here in public, where everypony can see you.//</span><br />Like where nobody&#039;s standing around on the platform or paying attention to her? You certainly haven&#039;t painted the picture of a busy area, anyway. By the way, I&#039;m well over the five-minute mark on reading this letter. The train should have left already…<br /><br />I also have to ask how they could give her a middle name of Octavia and not know what a treble clef is, given how prescient their naming schemes seem to be. For that matter, she has the longer name of &quot;Octavia Melody&quot; in the merchandising.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she bit back her fury, and her anguish, and her astonishing self-loathing//</span><br />This is coming on all of a sudden, and without any evidence. You seem like an experienced enough writer to understand &quot;show versus tell.&quot; (There&#039;s a section up top about that too, if you need a refresher.) You don&#039;t want to dump all this defining information about her in the form of a tell. That&#039;s not going to get me invested in her character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her work at the symphony paid virtually nothing//</span><br />Top musicians actually earn a comfortable living. I have to think Canterlot would have one of the leading orchestras, and with her being a valedictorian, she should be able to live comfortably.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then we sat around and smoked weed the rest of the night//</span><br />Just so you know, use of real-world drugs is against EqD policy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;However, the idea never really gained a lot of traction//</span><br />You really think so? The idea is actually quite common.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blighted plot of land like a great, graying wound upon the earth//</span><br />Alright, now you&#039;ve got a character voicing problem. Vinyl holds your perspective here, and this word choice and phrasing plain doesn&#039;t work for the personality you&#039;ve established for her. Unless the bad-girl stuff is just a front over an intelligent interior, but you&#039;ve given me no evidence of that. If your narrator&#039;s in her point of view, then he needs to sound at least in the ballpark of what she might say in terms of vocabulary and phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia&#039;s light//</span><br />This is one of the most cliched phrasings in the fandom.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But Octavia seemed to know exactly where she was going//</span><br />And Vinyl should know exactly why she does…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;along the way, they hadn&#039;t so much as glimpsed another living soul//</span><br />You already said as much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reacquainting herself with the scent of the place//</span><br />Why are you popping back into Octavia&#039;s head for the grand total of one sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was quiet, for a moment//</span><br />Why is that comma there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S&#039;not//</span><br />Consider where the missing letter actually is. &#039;S not.<br /><br />Oh yeah, so Octavia could barely lift her cello at the train station, but now she&#039;s having not trouble traipsing through the woods with it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S&#039;your//</span><br />Same deal as before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s you! It&#039;s really you!//</span><br />This whole paragraph is not a good idea. One or two lines, sure, but this kind of thing gets old fast.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />As a term of address, this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;desperate bawling//</span><br />Less is often more in emotional moments. If you go over the top, it loses its power.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the dark, raging waters of her soul//</span><br />Yeah, you&#039;re getting really maudlin here.<br /><br />The perspective&#039;s really wavering a lot here at the end. You might want to read the section on head hopping, too.<br /><br />These would be my main laundry list of issues: commas, appropriate narrative voicing, consistent perspective, some melodrama, some telly language, and overload of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. And lose the drug reference.<br /><br />This story&#039;s also pretty weak on the conflict. It was pretty obvious from the beginning of Pinkie&#039;s letter that we&#039;d get to this point, and we already knew that Pinkie was accepting of her. And Octavia was willing to go meet Pinkie, or she wouldn&#039;t have been at the train station in the first place. So there was no question that this moment would arrive. The real conflict that had been dangled in front of my face was how Octavia would relate to the rest of her family, and… we never get to see that. I really get everything I can from the story within the first few pages. It plays as a nice series of scenes, but there&#039;s not really a story there.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 146

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>It's quite a strange thing, the power of words.//

It's a tricky thing to strike a conversational tone like this, considering that your narrator doesn't have a perspective. Consider this line from a bit later:
>her rather considerable wings//
This is again a perspective problem. The narrator is expressing an opinion, but whose? He hasn't adopted a character's point of view yet, so nobody in the story. He shouldn't express his own, unless he's been established as a character in his own right, like someone sitting down with me and telling me the story. So whose opinion is it?

>pony kind//

One word, as in "mankind."

>He began to ponder whether or not that was what had brought this about//

And now you're in this Baron's head. I'm betting you don't stay there long enough to justify taking his viewpoint…

>She was a pony who chose her words carefully, and always said what she meant.//

See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Even the guard, who was, on the whole, used to Celestia's little idiosyncrasies, felt a slight hint of unease//

Ah, I was right. Now I'm betting you don't stay with the guard long, either.

>They wondered//

You're doing an awful lot of wondering early on in this story. It's a weak action. Occasional use is fine, but you're relying on it a bit much.

>Richelieu cleared his throat once more and tried again.//

Speaking of weak actions, "to be" is an inherently boring verb. You have eight of them in this paragraph alone. Use more active verbs. They keep things interesting.

>it sound irregular//

Typo.

>Celestia saw a few shudders go through the gathered ponies, but she didn't care.//

And now we're in Celestia's head. Definitely read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>Hearths//

That's a possessive.

>Their expressions ranged from unease to cautious optimism//

And add the section on show versus tell to your reading list.

>watered down//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>The amount of them//

"Amount" is for collective quantities. You want "number."

>Ever social stigma, every bias//

Typo.

>a rather large unicorn stallion name Iron Hoof//

Typo.

>flying close to her, and she looked to see Luna flying//

Watch the word repetition.

>And now that you're standing on the battlefield, I'm afraid that you are now fair game.//

More repetition.

>"Sweet dreams, We hope?"//

Why would she capitalize "We" but not "thee" or "thou"?

>The smiles of both sisters fell, and they turned towards the horizon, igniting their horns to move the sun and the moon.//

I can find no reason why they'd be sad here…

>raise takes//

Did you mean "taxes"?

So, the biggest problems here are the abundance of "to be" verbs, a couple spots of inopportune telling, and a very flighty narrative viewpoint in the early going. I have to say that there's really not much sad there. The ending of the first scene stumped me as to what was supposed to be sad, and the ending of the story had a more forced sad feel to it. So she feels self-conscious about ordering a snowball fight? There are doubtless ones who would enjoy it. Instead of requiring participation, why not schedule a time for all who want to take part? And Luna knows how much fun Celestia thought it would be. Certainly, she'd be willing to help. There's not really a convincing reason here that Celstia can't have a snowball fight.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s quite a strange thing, the power of words.//</span><br />It&#039;s a tricky thing to strike a conversational tone like this, considering that your narrator doesn&#039;t have a perspective. Consider this line from a bit later:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her rather considerable wings//</span><br />This is again a perspective problem. The narrator is expressing an opinion, but whose? He hasn&#039;t adopted a character&#039;s point of view yet, so nobody in the story. He shouldn&#039;t express his own, unless he&#039;s been established as a character in his own right, like someone sitting down with me and telling me the story. So whose opinion is it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pony kind//</span><br />One word, as in &quot;mankind.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He began to ponder whether or not that was what had brought this about//</span><br />And now you&#039;re in this Baron&#039;s head. I&#039;m betting you don&#039;t stay there long enough to justify taking his viewpoint…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was a pony who chose her words carefully, and always said what she meant.//</span><br />See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even the guard, who was, on the whole, used to Celestia&#039;s little idiosyncrasies, felt a slight hint of unease//</span><br />Ah, I was right. Now I&#039;m betting you don&#039;t stay with the guard long, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They wondered//</span><br />You&#039;re doing an awful lot of wondering early on in this story. It&#039;s a weak action. Occasional use is fine, but you&#039;re relying on it a bit much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Richelieu cleared his throat once more and tried again.//</span><br />Speaking of weak actions, &quot;to be&quot; is an inherently boring verb. You have eight of them in this paragraph alone. Use more active verbs. They keep things interesting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it sound irregular//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia saw a few shudders go through the gathered ponies, but she didn&#039;t care.//</span><br />And now we&#039;re in Celestia&#039;s head. Definitely read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearths//</span><br />That&#039;s a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Their expressions ranged from unease to cautious optimism//</span><br />And add the section on show versus tell to your reading list.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;watered down//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The amount of them//</span><br />&quot;Amount&quot; is for collective quantities. You want &quot;number.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ever social stigma, every bias//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a rather large unicorn stallion name Iron Hoof//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flying close to her, and she looked to see Luna flying//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And now that you&#039;re standing on the battlefield, I&#039;m afraid that you are now fair game.//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Sweet dreams, We hope?&quot;//</span><br />Why would she capitalize &quot;We&quot; but not &quot;thee&quot; or &quot;thou&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The smiles of both sisters fell, and they turned towards the horizon, igniting their horns to move the sun and the moon.//</span><br />I can find no reason why they&#039;d be sad here…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;raise takes//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;taxes&quot;?<br /><br />So, the biggest problems here are the abundance of &quot;to be&quot; verbs, a couple spots of inopportune telling, and a very flighty narrative viewpoint in the early going. I have to say that there&#039;s really not much sad there. The ending of the first scene stumped me as to what was supposed to be sad, and the ending of the story had a more forced sad feel to it. So she feels self-conscious about ordering a snowball fight? There are doubtless ones who would enjoy it. Instead of requiring participation, why not schedule a time for all who want to take part? And Luna knows how much fun Celestia thought it would be. Certainly, she&#039;d be willing to help. There&#039;s not really a convincing reason here that Celstia <i>can&#039;t</i> have a snowball fight.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 147

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Pinkie scampered down the dimly lit road, chill winter air rushing past her, bouncing a little on every eighth step, mind a flurry of anticipation.//

First sentence already. Look how back loaded this is. You start off with a nice, clear image and your lead character. So far, so good. Then you tack on a phrase. Then another. Then a third. It gets clunky, and it steals focus from that nice first image. It's like the first Lord of the Rings Movie. It draws to a nice close. But wait, it's not over. Then it draws to a close. But it's not over. You get the picture.

>hope and worry coiled around her throat//

Depending on how you use it in the story, telling isn't necessarily a bad thing, but this is the first emotional note in the story, so you need to make it authentic and connect with the reader. Telling isn't the way to do that. There's a discussion of show versus tell in the OP of this thread.

>her stance was cheerful and confident, her ears up, head cocked slightly//

Same deal. You tell us her emotion, but then you make that unnecessary by going on to describe someone who we can identify as maybe no those exact emotions, but close enough.

>daiquiri//

What about Manehattan conjures a daiquiri? I'd expect something like a cosmopolitan or a long island iced tea.

>you –” Rarity dabbed at Pinkie's muzzle with a handkerchief. “– I//

In an aside put into a quote like this, you don't put a period as end punctuation (other end punctuation can work). The two parts of the sentence need to make sense when joined, though, and these would be separate sentences.

>Had her digression annoyed Rarity.//

This is a question, right?

>Pardon me if this is intrusive, but shouldn't you already know this?//

I was going to chide you for the preceding infodump, but I decided to let it slide. Then you went and made it superfluous…

>… Yes?//

You don't need to leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>Pinkie took a gulp of champagne.//

And considering how she reacted to the last one, nothing happens this time?

>And,//

It's only in specific circumstances that commas after conjunctions are used correctly. This one is not. They're not good things to use for dramatic pauses, if that's what you intended.

>“Pinkie!”

It's standard to italicize ! or ? when it's on an italicized letter.

>S'okay//

Think about where the missing letters actually are. That's where the apostrophe goes. 'S okay.

>when the shock has subsided//

Why is this in present?

>Hush, and kiss me again, you silly, impetuous creature!//

Overblown lines like this really stretch the story's credibility.

>at a reasonably hour tomorrow//

Typo or missing word.

>Given that I will going away to work//

Missing word.

>Earth pony//

Don't capitalize this, unless you're capitalizing the entire two-word phrase and both of the other races as well. As it is, you're referring to our planet, not ground.

>and bit chubby//

Missing word.

First, this is well-written, for the most part. I'm glad you were able to keep the entire thing in Pinkie's perspective instead of ping-ponging between her and Rarity, a mistake many inexperienced writers make. There's not enough here to warrant a strike, but I do need to caution you about a couple of things.

First, I'd at least like to see a summary of where this is going, if not see a couple more finished chapters. Actually, first and second, because this would alleviate both of my concerns. You kept it clean so far, but you hinted at some possible behavior that could cross the line, depending on how explicit you get. The other matter is the stage of their relationship. I see your author's note that you want to write about the relationship after its start instead of leading up to that. This is fine, but it doesn't absolve you of the need to justify the relationship. It's not enough to throw the two characters together, have them act lovey-dovey, and expect me to believe they work well together or care about them. The easy way to do this is, well, to show the relationship develop. It's fine to start where you did in the timeline, but to have an instant attraction? It's pretty thin. I'm allowing the possibility that you had planned to address this in subsequent chapters through flashback or little details. There are lots of ways to make it work. Pinkie can have a fleeting thought about how Rarity standing in the sunbeam reminds her of the time when X happened and Rarity didn't even know Pinkie liked her yet. These are the things that make it real and make me believe these characters love each other, not just because you tell me they do. It's also necessary to show that they have real chemistry together in their moment-by-moment interactions so they they feel authentic. You actually do pretty well on that front, as they have some nice banter together. But look at what we get: Pinkie goes to Rarity's, keeps ogling her, and then she yearns to kiss Rarity without any sort of supporting evidence as to why she'd feel this way. And then, of course, Rarity instantly reciprocates, because everything's always rosy in real romance. Neither one suspected how the other felt, but they conveniently feel the same way at the same time, and kissing someone when you have no idea if they want it is always a good idea, right?

The viability of the romance is really the long pole in the tent here, but given our yes/no policy, I wouldn't be giving you this level of feedback if I didn't think you could make something special out of this.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie scampered down the dimly lit road, chill winter air rushing past her, bouncing a little on every eighth step, mind a flurry of anticipation.//</span><br />First sentence already. Look how back loaded this is. You start off with a nice, clear image and your lead character. So far, so good. Then you tack on a phrase. Then another. Then a third. It gets clunky, and it steals focus from that nice first image. It&#039;s like the first Lord of the Rings Movie. It draws to a nice close. But wait, it&#039;s not over. Then it draws to a close. But it&#039;s not over. You get the picture.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hope and worry coiled around her throat//</span><br />Depending on how you use it in the story, telling isn&#039;t necessarily a bad thing, but this is the first emotional note in the story, so you need to make it authentic and connect with the reader. Telling isn&#039;t the way to do that. There&#039;s a discussion of show versus tell in the OP of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her stance was cheerful and confident, her ears up, head cocked slightly//</span><br />Same deal. You tell us her emotion, but then you make that unnecessary by going on to describe someone who we can identify as maybe no those exact emotions, but close enough.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;daiquiri//</span><br />What about Manehattan conjures a daiquiri? I&#039;d expect something like a cosmopolitan or a long island iced tea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you –” Rarity dabbed at Pinkie&#039;s muzzle with a handkerchief. “– I//</span><br />In an aside put into a quote like this, you don&#039;t put a period as end punctuation (other end punctuation can work). The two parts of the sentence need to make sense when joined, though, and these would be separate sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Had her digression annoyed Rarity.//</span><br />This is a question, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pardon me if this is intrusive, but shouldn&#039;t you already know this?//</span><br />I was going to chide you for the preceding infodump, but I decided to let it slide. Then you went and made it superfluous…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;… Yes?//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to leave a space after a leading ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie took a gulp of champagne.//</span><br />And considering how she reacted to the last one, nothing happens this time?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And,//</span><br />It&#039;s only in specific circumstances that commas after conjunctions are used correctly. This one is not. They&#039;re not good things to use for dramatic pauses, if that&#039;s what you intended.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Pink<i>ie</i>!”</span><br />It&#039;s standard to italicize ! or ? when it&#039;s on an italicized letter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S&#039;okay//</span><br />Think about where the missing letters actually are. That&#039;s where the apostrophe goes. &#039;S okay.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when the shock has subsided//</span><br />Why is this in present?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hush, and kiss me again, you silly, impetuous creature!//</span><br />Overblown lines like this really stretch the story&#039;s credibility.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at a reasonably hour tomorrow//</span><br />Typo or missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Given that I will going away to work//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Earth pony//</span><br />Don&#039;t capitalize this, unless you&#039;re capitalizing the entire two-word phrase and both of the other races as well. As it is, you&#039;re referring to our planet, not ground.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and bit chubby//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br />First, this is well-written, for the most part. I&#039;m glad you were able to keep the entire thing in Pinkie&#039;s perspective instead of ping-ponging between her and Rarity, a mistake many inexperienced writers make. There&#039;s not enough here to warrant a strike, but I do need to caution you about a couple of things.<br /><br />First, I&#039;d at least like to see a summary of where this is going, if not see a couple more finished chapters. Actually, first and second, because this would alleviate both of my concerns. You kept it clean so far, but you hinted at some possible behavior that could cross the line, depending on how explicit you get. The other matter is the stage of their relationship. I see your author&#039;s note that you want to write about the relationship after its start instead of leading up to that. This is fine, but it doesn&#039;t absolve you of the need to justify the relationship. It&#039;s not enough to throw the two characters together, have them act lovey-dovey, and expect me to believe they work well together or care about them. The easy way to do this is, well, to show the relationship develop. It&#039;s fine to start where you did in the timeline, but to have an instant attraction? It&#039;s pretty thin. I&#039;m allowing the possibility that you had planned to address this in subsequent chapters through flashback or little details. There are lots of ways to make it work. Pinkie can have a fleeting thought about how Rarity standing in the sunbeam reminds her of the time when X happened and Rarity didn&#039;t even know Pinkie liked her yet. These are the things that make it real and make me believe these characters love each other, not just because you tell me they do. It&#039;s also necessary to show that they have real chemistry together in their moment-by-moment interactions so they they feel authentic. You actually do pretty well on that front, as they have some nice banter together. But look at what we get: Pinkie goes to Rarity&#039;s, keeps ogling her, and then she yearns to kiss Rarity without any sort of supporting evidence as to why she&#039;d feel this way. And then, of course, Rarity instantly reciprocates, because everything&#039;s always rosy in real romance. Neither one suspected how the other felt, but they conveniently feel the same way at the same time, and kissing someone when you have no idea if they want it is always a good idea, right?<br /><br />The viability of the romance is really the long pole in the tent here, but given our yes/no policy, I wouldn&#039;t be giving you this level of feedback if I didn&#039;t think you could make something special out of this.<br />

Change in pre-reader feedback Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 148

I don't know that many people actually peruse this thread, so I'll cross-post this in the "Ask a Pre-reader" thread as well. Not that many people peruse that one either…

I enjoy helping writers. For the majority of stories I review, I give lengthy feedback for the purpose of helping those authors improve. I used to do so directly through the email Equestria Daily sends out, but when we changed our standards for feedback last year, I opted to do so here instead. We may be on the eve of another change, but I'm revisiting this policy anyway.

I have no idea how many authors actually use the feedback I give. If I go by the number who actually reply or who resubmit their stories after making changes, the figure is around 10%. Maybe a lot more than that do use my advice and I just don't know it, but given that I spend an average of about 2 hours reviewing each one of these, I can't help but feel like I'm spending a lot of time on an activity that few people use.

So in the future, I may go to a system where I only provide this level of feedback to the people most likely to use it: stories that I feel are close to being acceptable for posting. They're the ones most likely to use this feedback, since they have the end goal in sight. I'd still be available to ask for clarification on any of the stories I review, but since I have a bad memory, this would likely involve rereading your story, and I can't commit to having time for any given request. You might do just as well submitting your story to one of the reviewing groups we recommend—they're pretty good at picking up the same problems that we'd identify.

This is being done so I can get to more stories and reduce the queue wait times, so I'd target feedback to the authors most likely to use it. I'd give a full review to every story if I could, and maybe once the queue size is reduced significantly, I can go back to that, but for now, I need to concentrate on what's likely to produce the most return on my time investment.
I don&#039;t know that many people actually peruse this thread, so I&#039;ll cross-post this in the &quot;Ask a Pre-reader&quot; thread as well. Not that many people peruse that one either…<br /><br />I enjoy helping writers. For the majority of stories I review, I give lengthy feedback for the purpose of helping those authors improve. I used to do so directly through the email Equestria Daily sends out, but when we changed our standards for feedback last year, I opted to do so here instead. We may be on the eve of another change, but I&#039;m revisiting this policy anyway.<br /><br />I have no idea how many authors actually use the feedback I give. If I go by the number who actually reply or who resubmit their stories after making changes, the figure is around 10%. Maybe a lot more than that do use my advice and I just don&#039;t know it, but given that I spend an average of about 2 hours reviewing each one of these, I can&#039;t help but feel like I&#039;m spending a lot of time on an activity that few people use.<br /><br />So in the future, I may go to a system where I only provide this level of feedback to the people most likely to use it: stories that I feel are close to being acceptable for posting. They&#039;re the ones most likely to use this feedback, since they have the end goal in sight. I&#039;d still be available to ask for clarification on any of the stories I review, but since I have a bad memory, this would likely involve rereading your story, and I can&#039;t commit to having time for any given request. You might do just as well submitting your story to one of the reviewing groups we recommend—they&#039;re pretty good at picking up the same problems that we&#039;d identify.<br /><br />This is being done so I can get to more stories and reduce the queue wait times, so I&#039;d target feedback to the authors most likely to use it. I&#039;d give a full review to every story if I could, and maybe once the queue size is reduced significantly, I can go back to that, but for now, I need to concentrate on what&#039;s likely to produce the most return on my time investment.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Fri, Mar 14th, 2014 14:11</span></div><br/>

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 149

File: 139502258847.jpg (64.41 KB, 960x567, 137978452445.jpg)

>>129894

Hope it's alright to post this here.

I come here pretty often to read your critiques. It helps my own writing when I see so many examples of things writers do well and things they need to work on. This isn't meant to pressure you into continuing if you don't care to; I just wanted to let you know that your efforts are not unappreciated.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129894" onclick="return highlight('129894', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129894">&gt;&gt;129894</a><br /><br />Hope it&#039;s alright to post this here.<br /><br />I come here pretty often to read your critiques. It helps my own writing when I see so many examples of things writers do well and things they need to work on. This isn&#039;t meant to pressure you into continuing if you don&#039;t care to; I just wanted to let you know that your efforts are not unappreciated.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 150

>>129916
I'm not stopping altogether, just cutting back on the number of stories I do this for. If a story is close to being postable, especially if it's close enough that I'm not giving it a strike, I'll still give feedback here. I just can't do it for every story, for the time being.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129916" onclick="return highlight('129916', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129916">&gt;&gt;129916</a><br />I&#039;m not stopping altogether, just cutting back on the number of stories I do this for. If a story is close to being postable, especially if it&#039;s close enough that I&#039;m not giving it a strike, I&#039;ll still give feedback here. I just can&#039;t do it for every story, for the time being.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 151

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>top-floor window

Unless her room rise multiple stories, I don't see how this works.

>hooting of an owl//

During the day?

>32//

Write out numbers this short.

>Six Months Earlier…//

There are much more elegant ways of working this into the narration.

Her reaction to the letter is very… bland. I get that there's a certain numbness that comes in these situations, but I can tell you from experience that if you write an emotionally distant character as emotionless, it gets boring quickly. Better to show the contrast between what's going on inside and what she allows out.

>At the Hospital…//

Yeah… if you're going to alternate like this, even if it doesn't perfectly follow the pattern, it's not hard to drop cues in the narration that handle this nicely, and after it falls into a regular pattern, the reader will even expect it. It's making the story's time frame feel forced on me, a word I certainly wouldn't use to describe the rest of the story's aspects, so it sticks out.

>The nervousness she felt coming back to her parents' old house was always wiped away by Aunt Rosebud's smile.//

While this isn't a bad spot for telling, it's not exactly warming me up to this as a sweet moment, either. Instead of just naming it as nervousness, just a few words of physical symptoms would carry more power, like if a wave of warmth swept away her jitters whenever she saw that smile.

>wrote,//

You don't need the comma. Transcribed text doesn't use the same rules as dialogue.

>thinking this was too strong//

Note how this phrasing is decidedly external to her mind versus something like her just outright stating that it was too strong. You've been using a pretty subjective narrator, and in my opinion, something like that would suit it better.

>she had felt insecure about her circumstances almost daily//

Way too vague. Give me a couple of examples.

>She 's//

Extraneous space.

>You still have your dignity.//

Wow. That's a really insensitive thing to say. It's actually great, but let me see some more reaction to it. Is Rose really able to keep it under wraps like that? Does Lily realize how it sounded? What does Daisy do?

>even though her kiosk was right between their booths//

Comma to set off the dependent clause.

>she wasn't worried about poverty itself. Shame was her great fear, and month by month a nightmare was coming true.//

You're risking being too blunt and over-explaining things here.

>If this exercise was supposed to help her out of her depression//

At this point, wouldn't she still be in denial about her depression? I don't know how you envision Equestrian law, but based on something you said earlier, I'm not sure they can keep her there against her will.

>and we both have things that need saying//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>This was wrong, she thought as he continued.//

But you haven't italicized it as a thought.

>Sonny//

You spelled it "Sunny" earlier.

>who are you ta-.//

Use a proper dash, not a hyphen. And don't put a period after it. The only end punctuation you can put after a dash, and even then, it's optional, are an exclamation mark or question mark.

>Rose collapsed into sobs.//

For strong emotion, less is often more. People usually try to control themselves, under most circumstances. You don't want to be melodramatic.

>You taught me how to love.//

Ooh, that's pretty cliched.

>I wasn't. your only. secret. Was I?//

Using so many periods like this is kind of clumsy, but at least capitalize after them.

>I waited as long as I could, but this hurt was inevitable//

Well, only because he decided it was. Couldn't he have made the ultimatum before he cheated?

>This time the tears wouldn't come.//

Now, this is much more realistic, compared to her sobbing earlier.

>Daisy's look changed from curiosity to concern.//

Show me this. There's a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Keep it in mind.

>"They left me."//

Well, yeah, she told them to. You had me feeling sympathetic for her, but she just comes across as whiny here.

>Coldheart//

Oh, come on. Subtlety is a thing.

>would like to visit with you in a few minutes if you'd like//

Kind of a repetitive wording there.

>and everything would be confidential//

Another dependent clause needing a comma. There's some info in this under the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>Gathering all the pages she'd filled with her analysis//

You didn't give me the sense there were many. Aside from one vague statement, I only ever saw a few words mentioned, and there was never anything indicating she'd spent much time on it.

>He then engaged her in small talk for a few minutes before saying good night.//

And how does she react to this? Does it relax her? Make her feel like he's being insincere, or just trying to distract her?

>This wasn't day one of her recovery, Rose thought//

You do this a lot: italicize some thoughts, but not italicize others that are directly named as such. It's a bit jarring.

>began splaying outward as her head began to swim//

Watch the word repetition. And start/begin actions are weak anyway. Once in a while, they won't hurt, but they're also obvious. Any given action starts. It's only worth pointing that out when the beginning is noteworthy because it's an abrupt change or the action never finishes. They also sap some of the action from the main verb.

>Roseluck opened her eyes as the sun was rising.//

I suspect I'll go through and count your "to be" verbs at some point. Suffice it to say they're boring, and it's a good idea to limit them where you can. There are certainly times where a past participle works, but if you changed this to "Roseluck opened her eyes as the sun rose," I don't see that anything is lost. Then you also avoid sapping the action from your verb.

>Glancing toward the doorway, she noticed her new pad of paper beside the bed.//

Beware a few aspects of participles. One is that they synchronize actions, so she sees the pad at the same time she glances toward the doorway. While that's possible, you haven't described the layout of these things in a way that makes it intuitive, and I get the sense that one happens after the other anyway.

>This time doesn't have to be a waste. I can find the issue in my thinking//

This is quite an about-face from her thinking in the previous chapter. If that's intentional, you might want to ease me into it, say, mention how the new day has her taking a fresh perspective on things.

>you can only count on yourself//

Missing end punctuation, but since it's something she's jotting down, it's certainly possible that she would have left it off.

>Rose studied her final list//

Now look at the first word of each paragraph so far. Mix it up.

>But her nervousness was soon displaced by hope//

This is a pretty emotional point for the story. Show me this.

>They looked frantic.//

How so? None of the actions you described seem to convey this. Without convincing me of this through how they look and act, it's more of a cold fact that doesn't get me invested in the characters.

>She grabbed a simple tray of alfalfa and joined them.//

And then this. If her parents really look frantic, she's going to get her food first and keep them waiting? And she's going to be so lackadaisical about it?

>sor- sorry//

No spaces around the hyphens in a stutter.

>I was going through clinical depression.//

This is something I was going to bring up later, in the wrap-up comments at the end, but… Her depression is awful sudden. The implication that she "was going through clinical depression" as of yesterday is a little too abrupt. And this ties in with my problem with her suddenly deciding to attempt suicide. Yes, the events that prompted her depression are sudden, but the feeling itself is a bit more gradual. It's not like flipping a switch. And by giving it more of a forced, artificial treatment like this, you're robbing it of the power it could have.

>Honey, this isn't something you simply snap out of. Getting through this will take time.//

Yes. Likewise with getting into it.

>In fact, I was something of a monster to her.//

I could believe his wanting to apologize, but making an admission lik this really looks like plot convenience. You mentioned that the doctor had already spoken to her friends. Wouldn't he have spoken to her parents, too? Wouldn't he want this interaction to occur in a therapy session, where he could mediate? Or at least prepare her for this discussion?

>We've reconciled and he's loved me ever since.//We've reconciled and he's loved me ever since.//

Another spot where you need a comma between clauses.

>24//

Write it out.

>your doctor is off tomorrow and Monday//

Surely, someone else would have the authority to release her. As expensive as she's said this is, they'd force her to stay an extra two days for no good reason? Not buying it.

>Mom, dad…this wasn't your fault.//

As a term of address, "Dad" would be capitalized. And they don't react to this?

>Rose came away as sure as ever that the cause of her depression lay somewhere else.//

Why is she so intent on self-diagnosing? Isn't this what the doctor's there for?

>topics she had listed – the meaning of life, the importance of her work, and the issue of trust//

Given that you're detailing a list of examples or clarifications, a colon would work better than a dash.

>though given the circumstances of your breakup this week//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>she spent the rest of the evening drawing pictures of her with her aunt//

First, I'm surprised that you dropped this plot point as long as you had. She certainly felt like it was an important part of her life, but to lose track of it entirely undercuts that sense of importance. I'll also say again that she's making a very rapid recovery. She had certain feelings that drove her to attempt suicide, and they don't go away overnight. Yet she's very upbeat here, especially about the same things that had gotten her depressed in the first place. On the one hand, it's believable that her mood might swing all over the place, but erratically, not this very steady move from wishing herself dead to very optimistic. It's like you're condensing what normally takes weeks into a couple of days.

>9:15//

Write these out, unless it's a digital clock and you want to present it as a quote.

>She had found her balance.//

Again, this is absurdly quick. I'd also question that she'd be allowed to have something sharp like a pencil.

>you need to stay on your medication//

She hadn't been taking any… Don't spring this on me now.

>Well, that was the hard part//

Except… it wasn't. She sailed through all of it with very little trouble.

>Rose glanced at their booths and Lily broke the awkward silence.//

Another comma needed for a dependent clause. I should have pointed out enough of these by now to give you the picture. I'm not going to point them out anymore unless I'm flagging the sentence for another reason anyway.

>Rose discovered she was beaming, her first genuine smile since before the hospital.//

Okay, I really like this scene where she finds all the cards, and prompted by someone she doesn't know very well. This is a nice authientic emotional moment the likes of which I haven't seen since chapter 1.

>Instead her friends looked hurt, even angry. //

Show me!

>Now honey//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Daisy entered the conversation.//

Well, yes. We can tell by the fact that she speaks. This sentence is the epitome of empty filler.

>Now is the time.//

So, the second half of this scene… I have to admit, his is something I have problems with in my own writing. Everything these characters say is utterly believable. Their emotions and the thoughts they're expressing are authentic, reasonable, and relatable. But how they're saying it comes across as a little too rehearsed. I'd recommend going back over it and rewording things to sound a little more natural and off the cuff.

>a yellow earth pony with an orange mane//

The reader is presumably aware of who Carrot Top is. You don't need this, unless there's something about her appearance that ends up being important to the plot.

>dreaded word suicide//

Since she actually spoke the word, I'd leave it at "dreaded word." It'd be a little more subtle.

>upfront//

Two words.

>Second, I'm not a philosopher//

>Well, here's my philosophy for today//
This is… pretty contradictory. If you're doing it intentionally, Carrot Top needs to be more self-aware about it and call attention to it, probably in a self-deprecating manner.

>But I'm making a new friend, and I wouldn't have it any other way//

The abrupt way you end this scene costs it some of its power. You do go on to have Roseluck reflect on it in the next scene, but what's her immediate reaction here? It de-personalizes it to leave that connection unmade when it's most raw and fresh.

>Obliging her odd request//

Missing an indentation here.

>as if the danger had past//

Passed.

>"Thank you for saving me last week," she said, and they all went inside.//

Same thing here. This is way too understated. Subtlety is a thing, but so is not saying anything. How do her friends react to what she said? What does she think of their reaction?

>She is scared, Lily!//

Minor point, but Daisy's used her name for direct address two quotes in a row now. That doesn't seem natural.

>The next morning//

You tend to do this. <extended scene> <"time passes"> <a very small number of sentences>. And when you do, you tend to short change what happens on both sides of the time skip. How does Rose react to Carrot Top's advice? Is she agreeing just to agree? Does it make sense to her? Then the next morning, how does she feel as she gets out of bed, steels herself to go downstairs and say what she has to say, then speaks up? Definitely don't overstate things—leave something for the reader to intuit on his own, but you have to give me something. Don't make me invent the emotional investment. That's your job.

I will also say that it's a bit odd and convenient that Carrot Top has this expertise. If she has the education, why did she never get licensed? Despite a couple of testimonials in her favor, I'd be curious as to why. For all Roseluck knows, Carrot Top did apply for a license but was rejected. Using her with this almost deus-ex-machina ability smacks of "I need a pony with X expertise, but I really, really wanted to use Carrot Top in the story, so why not force her into that role?" She could use a more realistic background. We can't tell how old she is. Maybe she's a retired therapist? Maybe she writes an advice column on the side? Maybe she was a school counselor until she decided on a career change? I'm just spitballing here, but what you have for her seems pretty contrived.

>and several ponies expressed their delight that Rose was out front again//

Given how much emotional weight this has for her, you should probably give me a little detail. You don't have to do the blow-by-blow account of every customer, but something like a montage of well-wishing would get the point across.

>He. hurt. you.//

I bugged you about this before.

>When some other mare hears word that I was abused//

I guess I'll take her word for it, but I didn't exactly see anything from him that I'd call abuse. Daisy knows him, so maybe she's right, but she's ascribing motives to him that I haven't seen evidence of, and if it's not true, this could unfairly harm him.

It's just now occurred to me that all of Rose's customer interactions have been about flowers as decorations or gifts. They've eaten flowers in canon. Why isn't anyone buying them as food?

>exhibiting the grace and unconditional excellence//

I haven't seen any examples of negative customer interactions, so did this ever come up? It might be interesting to see how she handles it.

>Ponyville's clock tower//

They have called it "Ponyville Tower" in "Putting Your Hoof Down."

>Lily stepped out//

So why is Lily consistently staying out of things now? It says something about their relationship, but I'm left a bit mystified.

>some experimental desserts//

And we don't get to see what any of these are?

>Rebuked, Lily and Daisy looked at each other. "Sure," Lily said.//

Aside from a bit of vaguery from "rebuked" (which is a bit odd in and of itself, since that word choice would tend to be from Daisy and Lily's point of view, not Roseluck's), this is flat and emotionless. They looked at each other? How? In a way that would communicate fury, relief, shame, joy, …?

>Rose met with Fine Print the next day, and a meeting with her creditors was scheduled for Friday at noon. That day at the steps of the town hall, her friends encouraged her.//

Something about this isn't sitting right. I'm not sure a scene at the lawyer's office would be particularly interesting, unless you can wring some emotion out of it in the form of Rose taking charge of things. But you fast forward here without a scene change and blow through this. I think it'd work better if you did a scene break here and did this part as a summary after the fact.

>A tear of joy trickled down her cheek//

The single tear is one of the most cliched things you could have done.

>nearing the edge of town, somewhere near//

Watch that word repetition.

>What if all those trees were dead and bare, and the animals all gone?//

Maybe not the best analogy… since it's getting to autumn, they will be this way soon, though that doesn't mean it all ends.

>That's how I felt when I lost my aunt.//

And she's never really dealt with this in more than a superficial way. I was looking forward to seeing her work through her attachment to a beloved relative, but if it happened at all, it was off camera.

>lunchtime//

Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but I thought you'd spelled this as two words or hyphenated it in a previous chapter.

>The flower shop was closed that day due to a scheduled storm//

They can't do business in bad weather? It didn't seem like it was an outdoor shop.

>Tux 'n Tails//

The contraction has apostrophes on both sides: Tux 'n' Tails. But I have to say, this is a civil suit. The three mares' business didn't exist at the time of the alleged slander, the business wouldn't have been a party to it anyway, since they were private communications, and only one of them is being named as having committed it, so they'd have no grounds to sue either the business or the other two mares. I also don't see how Lady Slipper could be a party to the action either, since the alleged slander had nothing to do with her. I suppose most readers won't know that, but but if you're going to branch out into something that requires a technical understanding, it pays to get it right. Google and Wikipedia are your friends for brief forays into unfamiliar territory.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;top-floor window</span><br />Unless her room rise multiple stories, I don&#039;t see how this works.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hooting of an owl//</span><br />During the day?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;32//</span><br />Write out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Six Months Earlier…//</span><br />There are much more elegant ways of working this into the narration.<br /><br />Her reaction to the letter is very… bland. I get that there&#039;s a certain numbness that comes in these situations, but I can tell you from experience that if you write an emotionally distant character as emotionless, it gets boring quickly. Better to show the contrast between what&#039;s going on inside and what she allows out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At the Hospital…//</span><br />Yeah… if you&#039;re going to alternate like this, even if it doesn&#039;t perfectly follow the pattern, it&#039;s not hard to drop cues in the narration that handle this nicely, and after it falls into a regular pattern, the reader will even expect it. It&#039;s making the story&#039;s time frame feel forced on me, a word I certainly wouldn&#039;t use to describe the rest of the story&#039;s aspects, so it sticks out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The nervousness she felt coming back to her parents&#039; old house was always wiped away by Aunt Rosebud&#039;s smile.//</span><br />While this isn&#039;t a bad spot for telling, it&#039;s not exactly warming me up to this as a sweet moment, either. Instead of just naming it as nervousness, just a few words of physical symptoms would carry more power, like if a wave of warmth swept away her jitters whenever she saw that smile.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wrote,//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the comma. Transcribed text doesn&#039;t use the same rules as dialogue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thinking this was too strong//</span><br />Note how this phrasing is decidedly external to her mind versus something like her just outright stating that it was too strong. You&#039;ve been using a pretty subjective narrator, and in my opinion, something like that would suit it better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she had felt insecure about her circumstances almost daily//</span><br />Way too vague. Give me a couple of examples.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She &#039;s//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You still have your dignity.//</span><br />Wow. That&#039;s a really insensitive thing to say. It&#039;s actually great, but let me see some more reaction to it. Is Rose really able to keep it under wraps like that? Does Lily realize how it sounded? What does Daisy do?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even though her kiosk was right between their booths//</span><br />Comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she wasn&#039;t worried about poverty itself. Shame was her great fear, and month by month a nightmare was coming true.//</span><br />You&#039;re risking being too blunt and over-explaining things here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If this exercise was supposed to help her out of her depression//</span><br />At this point, wouldn&#039;t she still be in denial about her depression? I don&#039;t know how you envision Equestrian law, but based on something you said earlier, I&#039;m not sure they can keep her there against her will.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and we both have things that need saying//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This was wrong, she thought as he continued.//</span><br />But you haven&#039;t italicized it as a thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonny//</span><br />You spelled it &quot;Sunny&quot; earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who are you ta-.//</span><br />Use a proper dash, not a hyphen. And don&#039;t put a period after it. The only end punctuation you can put after a dash, and even then, it&#039;s optional, are an exclamation mark or question mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rose collapsed into sobs.//</span><br />For strong emotion, less is often more. People usually try to control themselves, under most circumstances. You don&#039;t want to be melodramatic.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You taught me how to love.//</span><br />Ooh, that&#039;s pretty cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I wasn&#039;t. your only. secret. Was I?//</span><br />Using so many periods like this is kind of clumsy, but at least capitalize after them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I waited as long as I could, but this hurt was inevitable//</span><br />Well, only because he decided it was. Couldn&#039;t he have made the ultimatum before he cheated?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This time the tears wouldn&#039;t come.//</span><br />Now, this is much more realistic, compared to her sobbing earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Daisy&#039;s look changed from curiosity to concern.//</span><br />Show me this. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. Keep it in mind.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;They left me.&quot;//</span><br />Well, yeah, she told them to. You had me feeling sympathetic for her, but she just comes across as whiny here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coldheart//</span><br />Oh, come on. Subtlety is a thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;would like to visit with you in a few minutes if you&#039;d like//</span><br />Kind of a repetitive wording there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and everything would be confidential//</span><br />Another dependent clause needing a comma. There&#039;s some info in this under the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gathering all the pages she&#039;d filled with her analysis//</span><br />You didn&#039;t give me the sense there were many. Aside from one vague statement, I only ever saw a few words mentioned, and there was never anything indicating she&#039;d spent much time on it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He then engaged her in small talk for a few minutes before saying good night.//</span><br />And how does she react to this? Does it relax her? Make her feel like he&#039;s being insincere, or just trying to distract her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This wasn&#039;t day one of her recovery, Rose thought//</span><br />You do this a lot: italicize some thoughts, but not italicize others that are directly named as such. It&#039;s a bit jarring.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;began splaying outward as her head began to swim//</span><br />Watch the word repetition. And start/begin actions are weak anyway. Once in a while, they won&#039;t hurt, but they&#039;re also obvious. Any given action starts. It&#039;s only worth pointing that out when the beginning is noteworthy because it&#039;s an abrupt change or the action never finishes. They also sap some of the action from the main verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Roseluck opened her eyes as the sun was rising.//</span><br />I suspect I&#039;ll go through and count your &quot;to be&quot; verbs at some point. Suffice it to say they&#039;re boring, and it&#039;s a good idea to limit them where you can. There are certainly times where a past participle works, but if you changed this to &quot;Roseluck opened her eyes as the sun rose,&quot; I don&#039;t see that anything is lost. Then you also avoid sapping the action from your verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Glancing toward the doorway, she noticed her new pad of paper beside the bed.//</span><br />Beware a few aspects of participles. One is that they synchronize actions, so she sees the pad at the same time she glances toward the doorway. While that&#039;s possible, you haven&#039;t described the layout of these things in a way that makes it intuitive, and I get the sense that one happens after the other anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This time doesn&#039;t have to be a waste. I can find the issue in my thinking//</span><br />This is quite an about-face from her thinking in the previous chapter. If that&#039;s intentional, you might want to ease me into it, say, mention how the new day has her taking a fresh perspective on things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you can only count on yourself//</span><br />Missing end punctuation, but since it&#039;s something she&#039;s jotting down, it&#039;s certainly possible that she would have left it off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rose studied her final list//</span><br />Now look at the first word of each paragraph so far. Mix it up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But her nervousness was soon displaced by hope//</span><br />This is a pretty emotional point for the story. Show me this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They looked frantic.//</span><br />How so? None of the actions you described seem to convey this. Without convincing me of this through how they look and act, it&#039;s more of a cold fact that doesn&#039;t get me invested in the characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She grabbed a simple tray of alfalfa and joined them.//</span><br />And then this. If her parents really look frantic, she&#039;s going to get her food first and keep them waiting? And she&#039;s going to be so lackadaisical about it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sor- sorry//</span><br />No spaces around the hyphens in a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was going through clinical depression.//</span><br />This is something I was going to bring up later, in the wrap-up comments at the end, but… Her depression is awful sudden. The implication that she &quot;was going through clinical depression&quot; as of yesterday is a little too abrupt. And this ties in with my problem with her suddenly deciding to attempt suicide. Yes, the events that prompted her depression are sudden, but the feeling itself is a bit more gradual. It&#039;s not like flipping a switch. And by giving it more of a forced, artificial treatment like this, you&#039;re robbing it of the power it could have.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Honey, this isn&#039;t something you simply snap out of. Getting through this will take time.//</span><br />Yes. Likewise with getting <i>into</i> it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In fact, I was something of a monster to her.//</span><br />I could believe his wanting to apologize, but making an admission lik this really looks like plot convenience. You mentioned that the doctor had already spoken to her friends. Wouldn&#039;t he have spoken to her parents, too? Wouldn&#039;t he want this interaction to occur in a therapy session, where he could mediate? Or at least prepare her for this discussion?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We&#039;ve reconciled and he&#039;s loved me ever since.//We&#039;ve reconciled and he&#039;s loved me ever since.//</span><br />Another spot where you need a comma between clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;24//</span><br />Write it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your doctor is off tomorrow and Monday//</span><br />Surely, someone else would have the authority to release her. As expensive as she&#039;s said this is, they&#039;d force her to stay an extra two days for no good reason? Not buying it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mom, dad…this wasn&#039;t your fault.//</span><br />As a term of address, &quot;Dad&quot; would be capitalized. And they don&#039;t react to this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rose came away as sure as ever that the cause of her depression lay somewhere else.//</span><br />Why is she so intent on self-diagnosing? Isn&#039;t this what the doctor&#039;s there for?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;topics she had listed – the meaning of life, the importance of her work, and the issue of trust//</span><br />Given that you&#039;re detailing a list of examples or clarifications, a colon would work better than a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;though given the circumstances of your breakup this week//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she spent the rest of the evening drawing pictures of her with her aunt//</span><br />First, I&#039;m surprised that you dropped this plot point as long as you had. She certainly felt like it was an important part of her life, but to lose track of it entirely undercuts that sense of importance. I&#039;ll also say again that she&#039;s making a very rapid recovery. She had certain feelings that drove her to attempt suicide, and they don&#039;t go away overnight. Yet she&#039;s very upbeat here, especially about the same things that had gotten her depressed in the first place. On the one hand, it&#039;s believable that her mood might swing all over the place, but erratically, not this very steady move from wishing herself dead to very optimistic. It&#039;s like you&#039;re condensing what normally takes weeks into a couple of days.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;9:15//</span><br />Write these out, unless it&#039;s a digital clock and you want to present it as a quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had found her balance.//</span><br />Again, this is absurdly quick. I&#039;d also question that she&#039;d be allowed to have something sharp like a pencil.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you need to stay on your medication//</span><br />She hadn&#039;t been taking any… Don&#039;t spring this on me now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well, that was the hard part//</span><br />Except… it wasn&#039;t. She sailed through all of it with very little trouble.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rose glanced at their booths and Lily broke the awkward silence.//</span><br />Another comma needed for a dependent clause. I should have pointed out enough of these by now to give you the picture. I&#039;m not going to point them out anymore unless I&#039;m flagging the sentence for another reason anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rose discovered she was beaming, her first genuine smile since before the hospital.//</span><br />Okay, I really like this scene where she finds all the cards, and prompted by someone she doesn&#039;t know very well. This is a nice authientic emotional moment the likes of which I haven&#039;t seen since chapter 1.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Instead her friends looked hurt, even angry. //</span><br />Show me!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now honey//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Daisy entered the conversation.//</span><br />Well, yes. We can tell by the fact that she speaks. This sentence is the epitome of empty filler.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now is the time.//</span><br />So, the second half of this scene… I have to admit, his is something I have problems with in my own writing. Everything these characters say is utterly believable. Their emotions and the thoughts they&#039;re expressing are authentic, reasonable, and relatable. But how they&#039;re saying it comes across as a little too rehearsed. I&#039;d recommend going back over it and rewording things to sound a little more natural and off the cuff.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a yellow earth pony with an orange mane//</span><br />The reader is presumably aware of who Carrot Top is. You don&#039;t need this, unless there&#039;s something about her appearance that ends up being important to the plot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dreaded word suicide//</span><br />Since she actually spoke the word, I&#039;d leave it at &quot;dreaded word.&quot; It&#039;d be a little more subtle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;upfront//</span><br />Two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Second, I&#039;m not a philosopher//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well, here&#039;s my philosophy for today//</span><br />This is… pretty contradictory. If you&#039;re doing it intentionally, Carrot Top needs to be more self-aware about it and call attention to it, probably in a self-deprecating manner.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But I&#039;m making a new friend, and I wouldn&#039;t have it any other way//</span><br />The abrupt way you end this scene costs it some of its power. You do go on to have Roseluck reflect on it in the next scene, but what&#039;s her immediate reaction here? It de-personalizes it to leave that connection unmade when it&#039;s most raw and fresh.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Obliging her odd request//</span><br />Missing an indentation here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as if the danger had past//</span><br />Passed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Thank you for saving me last week,&quot; she said, and they all went inside.//</span><br />Same thing here. This is way too understated. Subtlety is a thing, but so is not saying anything. How do her friends react to what she said? What does she think of their reaction?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She is scared, Lily!//</span><br />Minor point, but Daisy&#039;s used her name for direct address two quotes in a row now. That doesn&#039;t seem natural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The next morning//</span><br />You tend to do this. &lt;extended scene&gt; &lt;&quot;time passes&quot;&gt; &lt;a very small number of sentences&gt;. And when you do, you tend to short change what happens on both sides of the time skip. How does Rose react to Carrot Top&#039;s advice? Is she agreeing just to agree? Does it make sense to her? Then the next morning, how does she feel as she gets out of bed, steels herself to go downstairs and say what she has to say, then speaks up? Definitely don&#039;t overstate things—leave something for the reader to intuit on his own, but you have to give me something. Don&#039;t make me invent the emotional investment. That&#039;s your job.<br /><br />I will also say that it&#039;s a bit odd and convenient that Carrot Top has this expertise. If she has the education, why did she never get licensed? Despite a couple of testimonials in her favor, I&#039;d be curious as to why. For all Roseluck knows, Carrot Top did apply for a license but was rejected. Using her with this almost deus-ex-machina ability smacks of &quot;I need a pony with X expertise, but I really, really wanted to use Carrot Top in the story, so why not force her into that role?&quot; She could use a more realistic background. We can&#039;t tell how old she is. Maybe she&#039;s a retired therapist? Maybe she writes an advice column on the side? Maybe she was a school counselor until she decided on a career change? I&#039;m just spitballing here, but what you have for her seems pretty contrived.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and several ponies expressed their delight that Rose was out front again//</span><br />Given how much emotional weight this has for her, you should probably give me a little detail. You don&#039;t have to do the blow-by-blow account of every customer, but something like a montage of well-wishing would get the point across.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He. hurt. you.//</span><br />I bugged you about this before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When some other mare hears word that I was abused//</span><br />I guess I&#039;ll take her word for it, but I didn&#039;t exactly see anything from him that I&#039;d call abuse. Daisy knows him, so maybe she&#039;s right, but she&#039;s ascribing motives to him that I haven&#039;t seen evidence of, and if it&#039;s not true, this could unfairly harm him.<br /><br />It&#039;s just now occurred to me that all of Rose&#039;s customer interactions have been about flowers as decorations or gifts. They&#039;ve eaten flowers in canon. Why isn&#039;t anyone buying them as food?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;exhibiting the grace and unconditional excellence//</span><br />I haven&#039;t seen any examples of negative customer interactions, so did this ever come up? It might be interesting to see how she handles it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville&#039;s clock tower//</span><br />They have called it &quot;Ponyville Tower&quot; in &quot;Putting Your Hoof Down.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily stepped out//</span><br />So why is Lily consistently staying out of things now? It says something about their relationship, but I&#039;m left a bit mystified.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;some experimental desserts//</span><br />And we don&#039;t get to see what any of these are?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rebuked, Lily and Daisy looked at each other. &quot;Sure,&quot; Lily said.//</span><br />Aside from a bit of vaguery from &quot;rebuked&quot; (which is a bit odd in and of itself, since that word choice would tend to be from Daisy and Lily&#039;s point of view, not Roseluck&#039;s), this is flat and emotionless. They looked at each other? How? In a way that would communicate fury, relief, shame, joy, …?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rose met with Fine Print the next day, and a meeting with her creditors was scheduled for Friday at noon. That day at the steps of the town hall, her friends encouraged her.//</span><br />Something about this isn&#039;t sitting right. I&#039;m not sure a scene at the lawyer&#039;s office would be particularly interesting, unless you can wring some emotion out of it in the form of Rose taking charge of things. But you fast forward here without a scene change and blow through this. I think it&#039;d work better if you did a scene break here and did this part as a summary after the fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A tear of joy trickled down her cheek//</span><br />The single tear is one of the most cliched things you could have done.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nearing the edge of town, somewhere near//</span><br />Watch that word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What if all those trees were dead and bare, and the animals all gone?//</span><br />Maybe not the best analogy… since it&#039;s getting to autumn, they will be this way soon, though that doesn&#039;t mean it all ends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That&#039;s how I felt when I lost my aunt.//</span><br />And she&#039;s never really dealt with this in more than a superficial way. I was looking forward to seeing her work through her attachment to a beloved relative, but if it happened at all, it was off camera.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lunchtime//</span><br />Maybe I&#039;m remembering wrong, but I thought you&#039;d spelled this as two words or hyphenated it in a previous chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The flower shop was closed that day due to a scheduled storm//</span><br />They can&#039;t do business in bad weather? It didn&#039;t seem like it was an outdoor shop.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tux &#039;n Tails//</span><br />The contraction has apostrophes on both sides: Tux &#039;n&#039; Tails. But I have to say, this is a civil suit. The three mares&#039; business didn&#039;t exist at the time of the alleged slander, the business wouldn&#039;t have been a party to it anyway, since they were private communications, and only one of them is being named as having committed it, so they&#039;d have no grounds to sue either the business or the other two mares. I also don&#039;t see how Lady Slipper could be a party to the action either, since the alleged slander had nothing to do with her. I suppose most readers won&#039;t know that, but but if you&#039;re going to branch out into something that requires a technical understanding, it pays to get it right. Google and Wikipedia are your friends for brief forays into unfamiliar territory.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 152

>>129927
>The slander part of that letter is true…sort of.//
Well… the plaintiff will have to prove that it's not true (which I think is the case, though you never explicitly said so) and that the person who said it should have known it wasn't true. The latter would be tough, since she actually did think it was true when she said it.

>or if this case turns criminal//

How would a slander case turn criminal?

>Lily looked Rose's direction//

Missing word.

>They say they already have evidence; let's see it.//

Well, that's one of the first things that'd happen during the discovery process. It wouldn't be a big deal.

>Sunb…, uh, the Plaintiff, won't be happy with anything that would let our business survive.//

Why is she so sure of this? I have to say I'm starting to buy into the slander argument myself. You've certainly gone out of your way to make this guy a villain, but I've never seen him do anything particularly bad. He cheated on her, but he was completely civil toward her, and I never saw him mistreat her. You shouldn't just declare someone a villain—you should show he's one, but keep him relatable, too. Some over-the-top, obvious super-villain would be even worse.

>Lily was searching the lobby with her eyes.//

As opposed to?

>The pegasus reached up and petted Rose's mane.//

"Patted," right? Otherwise, this is kinda weird.

>7//

Write it out.

>Tux replied, "No, Your Honor//

This lawyer is utterly incompetent. He brought a case he had no hope of winning. I was going to save this for the wrap-up comments, but I'll go ahead and say it here. This whole court case feels tacked on and tangential to the point the story was making. It smacks of throwing in more conflict for the sake of conflict (which I will address at the end). But even if it somehow worked, it just fizzles out here. It was never more than a momentary concern, and it wouldn't have made a difference to the story if you had removed it completely. That's a pretty good argument for doing so. I appreciate that you're throwing in a stumbling block so that her recovery isn't all rosy, but you've made a few of those already, and ones more directly related to her problem would be more effective.

>and possibly your freedom//

But… slander is a civil matter…

>I order Sunburst to have no further contact with Roseluck or any other owner of Ponyville in Bloom except with the court's permission//

So… she's pre-emptively slapping a restraining order on him that nobody asked for?

Well, I obviously see something in your story, since I spent 5 days reviewing it in this age of predominantly yes/no responses. So what drew me to your story?

First, I thought the opening chapter was a great, honest look at the kind of despair that leads one to become suicidal. Too many stories we get glorify suicide and/or use it as a gateway to Equestria. Or they deal with it as a constant tragedy that gets hammered at the reader relentlessly. This was grounded much more in realism. It's not without its problems though. All the things I had to point out multiple times? Pay attention to those. Here are additional issues that stood out to me that I wanted to comment on (in an unorganized fashion, as it turns out):

Chapter 1 was very good. It set up her conflict and couched it in terms of this beloved aunt that she'd lost. I was looking forward to some nice memories of times together and working through the pain of it. But you all but dropped that aspect of the story. And to some degree, that's just me editorializing. I think that would be a powerful story, but it's not necessarily the one you want to write. I do think you should have given it more than you did, however. She initially describes that as the source of her pain, and even if she's wrong about that, it severely undercut that initial assessment by having her discard it so thoroughly. I did touch on this once already, but she was awfully quick to go from having a few things go wrong with her life to being suicidal. Don't rush things. It needs to feel like it's progressing at a natural pace. I was going to try and show you that other readers may have had the same reaction, but if I look at the number of views for each chapter (490, 288, 264, 220, 244, 217), it actually looks pretty normal. I would have expected more of a drop-off after chapter 2 due to the abrupt change in tone and rather rapid pace of recovery.

Which is my second point. She goes from utter hopelessness to actively seeking her own betterment in just a few days. Yes, medication has something to do with that, but her mood is different from her attitude, and the latter is really what doesn't ring true here. Yes, she has setbacks, but not of the kind to make her question whether she's doing the right thing. It's a bit much that someone so cheerful just recently wanted to take her own life. Again, don't rush it.

Which leads to my next point: contrast is your friend. I already alluded to bad thing after bad thing happening to her before she goes into the hospital. Look at what you did afterward. She has some lovely moments with her friends after she gets out, interspersed with some little relapses. This is nice, and I'd encourage you to do even more with that. Higher highs ad lower lows complement each other to lend weight to the story. I'd encourage you to do that in the hospital as well (and really, I think she'd be there much longer than that, but if you really want to tell it this way, that's your choice). I don't know if this is a situation you've been through. It's really a surreal experience. You latch onto people you meet in there, but they're obviously relationships based on unnatural circumstances, so they encourage you not to try to maintain those friendships after you get out. But they can make for some nice, light, contrasting moments from her emotional turmoil. If you've never seen it, I can recommend the movie "Girl, Interrupted" as a picture of the ups and downs of this process. I thought it was a great portrayal, and for reasons I won't get into, I've never been able to watch it again. But getting back to the point… Not only does shuffling in some happy moments play to the contrast, it also avoids "piling on," or throwing tragedy after tragedy at the reader in an attempt to make the story more emotional, but almost always has quite the opposite effect.

I pointed out a few spots of telly language, and I think I mentioned that there's a discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread. It speaks for itself, so I'll just say that this seemed to get worse the further I made it into the story.

Now, a word on repetition. I pointed out a few specific examples, but one particularly noteworthy one is the use of "to be" verbs. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs, even when the character isn't actually doing anything. For instance, take "He was there" versus "He sat there." They say the same thing, but one says it in a much more interesting fashion, and you can even substitute other verbs for subtle changes in mood, like lay, idled, sprawled… You get the picture. But of the easiest forms to check, I came up with these counts:
was/wasn't: 253 (with 95 in chapter 1 alone)
were/weren't: 82
is/isn't: 96
be/been/being: 195
That's about one every other sentence. This brings an utter standstill to the feeling that your story is in motion toward some goal.

I already complained about the court case plot point, so I'll just say again that it felt weak, pointless, and an example of the "piling on" I mentioned before. It doesn't help that the whole thing seems to have enough techincal problems to be unbelievable anyway, but it's so extraneous to they story's point, and it really changes nothing. I honestly think the story would be better without it. If you still want to have some sort of confrontation with Sunny, fine, but this isn't working.

And then the ending was pretty weak. The last line had no thematic significance, so there was no stinger there. It didn't wrap up a conflict with a nice bow. It just… ended. Really, the line a way back about her recalling seeing the scenery behind the hospital and thinking it was beautiful—that was a much better way of concluding things. It summed up her new attitude and positive outlook.

I know this seems like a lot, but I don't go into this much depth for many stories, and certainly not for ones that I don't feel are worth the time investment to do so. I'm giving you this level of feedback because I want you to come back with something special that I'd be proud to post.

I'd also encourage you not to try to attach this story to ny specific events in the fandom. I'm glad that you didn't do so in the synopsis or an author's note, but you did in the submission comments, and I have to say as many people who'd think of it as a tribute would also think of it as a publicity grab.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129927" onclick="return highlight('129927', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129927">&gt;&gt;129927</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The slander part of that letter is true…sort of.//</span><br />Well… the plaintiff will have to prove that it&#039;s not true (which I think is the case, though you never explicitly said so) and that the person who said it should have known it wasn&#039;t true. The latter would be tough, since she actually did think it was true when she said it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or if this case turns criminal//</span><br />How would a slander case turn criminal?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily looked Rose&#039;s direction//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They say they already have evidence; let&#039;s see it.//</span><br />Well, that&#039;s one of the first things that&#039;d happen during the discovery process. It wouldn&#039;t be a big deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunb…, uh, the Plaintiff, won&#039;t be happy with anything that would let our business survive.//</span><br />Why is she so sure of this? I have to say I&#039;m starting to buy into the slander argument myself. You&#039;ve certainly gone out of your way to make this guy a villain, but I&#039;ve never seen him do anything particularly bad. He cheated on her, but he was completely civil toward her, and I never saw him mistreat her. You shouldn&#039;t just declare someone a villain—you should show he&#039;s one, but keep him relatable, too. Some over-the-top, obvious super-villain would be even worse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily was searching the lobby with her eyes.//</span><br />As opposed to?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pegasus reached up and petted Rose&#039;s mane.//</span><br />&quot;Patted,&quot; right? Otherwise, this is kinda weird.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;7//</span><br />Write it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tux replied, &quot;No, Your Honor//</span><br />This lawyer is utterly incompetent. He brought a case he had no hope of winning. I was going to save this for the wrap-up comments, but I&#039;ll go ahead and say it here. This whole court case feels tacked on and tangential to the point the story was making. It smacks of throwing in more conflict for the sake of conflict (which I will address at the end). But even if it somehow worked, it just fizzles out here. It was never more than a momentary concern, and it wouldn&#039;t have made a difference to the story if you had removed it completely. That&#039;s a pretty good argument for doing so. I appreciate that you&#039;re throwing in a stumbling block so that her recovery isn&#039;t all rosy, but you&#039;ve made a few of those already, and ones more directly related to her problem would be more effective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and possibly your freedom//</span><br />But… slander is a civil matter…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I order Sunburst to have no further contact with Roseluck or any other owner of Ponyville in Bloom except with the court&#039;s permission//</span><br />So… she&#039;s pre-emptively slapping a restraining order on him that nobody asked for?<br /><br />Well, I obviously see something in your story, since I spent 5 days reviewing it in this age of predominantly yes/no responses. So what drew me to your story?<br /><br />First, I thought the opening chapter was a great, honest look at the kind of despair that leads one to become suicidal. Too many stories we get glorify suicide and/or use it as a gateway to Equestria. Or they deal with it as a constant tragedy that gets hammered at the reader relentlessly. This was grounded much more in realism. It&#039;s not without its problems though. All the things I had to point out multiple times? Pay attention to those. Here are additional issues that stood out to me that I wanted to comment on (in an unorganized fashion, as it turns out):<br /><br />Chapter 1 was very good. It set up her conflict and couched it in terms of this beloved aunt that she&#039;d lost. I was looking forward to some nice memories of times together and working through the pain of it. But you all but dropped that aspect of the story. And to some degree, that&#039;s just me editorializing. I think that would be a powerful story, but it&#039;s not necessarily the one you want to write. I do think you should have given it more than you did, however. She initially describes that as the source of her pain, and even if she&#039;s wrong about that, it severely undercut that initial assessment by having her discard it so thoroughly. I did touch on this once already, but she was awfully quick to go from having a few things go wrong with her life to being suicidal. Don&#039;t rush things. It needs to feel like it&#039;s progressing at a natural pace. I was going to try and show you that other readers may have had the same reaction, but if I look at the number of views for each chapter (490, 288, 264, 220, 244, 217), it actually looks pretty normal. I would have expected more of a drop-off after chapter 2 due to the abrupt change in tone and rather rapid pace of recovery.<br /><br />Which is my second point. She goes from utter hopelessness to actively seeking her own betterment in just a few days. Yes, medication has something to do with that, but her mood is different from her attitude, and the latter is really what doesn&#039;t ring true here. Yes, she has setbacks, but not of the kind to make her question whether she&#039;s doing the right thing. It&#039;s a bit much that someone so cheerful just recently wanted to take her own life. Again, don&#039;t rush it.<br /><br />Which leads to my next point: contrast is your friend. I already alluded to bad thing after bad thing happening to her before she goes into the hospital. Look at what you did afterward. She has some lovely moments with her friends after she gets out, interspersed with some little relapses. This is nice, and I&#039;d encourage you to do even more with that. Higher highs ad lower lows complement each other to lend weight to the story. I&#039;d encourage you to do that in the hospital as well (and really, I think she&#039;d be there much longer than that, but if you really want to tell it this way, that&#039;s your choice). I don&#039;t know if this is a situation you&#039;ve been through. It&#039;s really a surreal experience. You latch onto people you meet in there, but they&#039;re obviously relationships based on unnatural circumstances, so they encourage you not to try to maintain those friendships after you get out. But they can make for some nice, light, contrasting moments from her emotional turmoil. If you&#039;ve never seen it, I can recommend the movie &quot;Girl, Interrupted&quot; as a picture of the ups and downs of this process. I thought it was a great portrayal, and for reasons I won&#039;t get into, I&#039;ve never been able to watch it again. But getting back to the point… Not only does shuffling in some happy moments play to the contrast, it also avoids &quot;piling on,&quot; or throwing tragedy after tragedy at the reader in an attempt to make the story more emotional, but almost always has quite the opposite effect.<br /><br />I pointed out a few spots of telly language, and I think I mentioned that there&#039;s a discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread. It speaks for itself, so I&#039;ll just say that this seemed to get worse the further I made it into the story.<br /><br />Now, a word on repetition. I pointed out a few specific examples, but one particularly noteworthy one is the use of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs, even when the character isn&#039;t actually doing anything. For instance, take &quot;He was there&quot; versus &quot;He sat there.&quot; They say the same thing, but one says it in a much more interesting fashion, and you can even substitute other verbs for subtle changes in mood, like lay, idled, sprawled… You get the picture. But of the easiest forms to check, I came up with these counts:<br />was/wasn&#039;t: 253 (with 95 in chapter 1 alone)<br />were/weren&#039;t: 82<br />is/isn&#039;t: 96<br />be/been/being: 195<br />That&#039;s about one every other sentence. This brings an utter standstill to the feeling that your story is in motion toward some goal.<br /><br />I already complained about the court case plot point, so I&#039;ll just say again that it felt weak, pointless, and an example of the &quot;piling on&quot; I mentioned before. It doesn&#039;t help that the whole thing seems to have enough techincal problems to be unbelievable anyway, but it&#039;s so extraneous to they story&#039;s point, and it really changes nothing. I honestly think the story would be better without it. If you still want to have some sort of confrontation with Sunny, fine, but this isn&#039;t working.<br /><br />And then the ending was pretty weak. The last line had no thematic significance, so there was no stinger there. It didn&#039;t wrap up a conflict with a nice bow. It just… ended. Really, the line a way back about her recalling seeing the scenery behind the hospital and thinking it was beautiful—that was a much better way of concluding things. It summed up her new attitude and positive outlook.<br /><br />I know this seems like a lot, but I don&#039;t go into this much depth for many stories, and certainly not for ones that I don&#039;t feel are worth the time investment to do so. I&#039;m giving you this level of feedback because I want you to come back with something special that I&#039;d be proud to post.<br /><br />I&#039;d also encourage you not to try to attach this story to ny specific events in the fandom. I&#039;m glad that you didn&#039;t do so in the synopsis or an author&#039;s note, but you did in the submission comments, and I have to say as many people who&#039;d think of it as a tribute would also think of it as a publicity grab.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Wed, Mar 19th, 2014 17:22</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 153

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Rarity wrapped her forelegs around the small tree, wincing as the sap melded into her fur.//

Watch the participles. First, writers tend to overuse them, and I already see three in just the first seven sentences. But this one's also a misplaced modifier. It wants to describe the nearest prior object, so it sounds like the tree is wincing.

>I-Is//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a proper noun.

>squish//

Lose the italics. Narration isn't the place for sound effects, but it's a valid word anyway.

>grit teeth//

The only accepted past tense of this is "gritted."

>out-of-sight//

You only need the hyphenation when the phrase modifies something that's right next to it. You don't need it for a predicate adjective.

>R-Right, mom.//

Again, only capitalize the first. And when using "Mom" as a term of address or like a name (versus a more generic usage, like "my mom"), capitalize it.

>As soon as she was out-of-sight//

Same deal with the hyphenation. I tend to point out only two or three instances, then leave the rest for the writer to find. And so I turn it over to you.

>Velvet was laying calmly and jabbering excitedly//

Three problems here. First, keep an eye on the telly language. I don't think it's hurting here, but it's popped up occasionally. Second, you've confused lay/lie. And third, you're using a lot of these past participles, like "was [lying]." There is a time and place for that tense, but using it too much is unwieldy, and having that "to be" auxiliary verb saps the action from your main verb. Really consider whether this is necessary. I think the previous instance was, but this one isn't.

>along–except//

>go—//
Be consistent in your dash usage.

>She smiled.//

I'm only a couple of screens in, and this is already the 8th time you've used this action. It's getting repetitive.

>mom!//

Again, capitalize it as a term of address.

>And in the center of it all was Pinkie Pie, bags hanging from her eyes, diligently mopping the floors.//

Another misplace modifier. The "diligently mopping…" is so far from what it describes that it seems to refer to her eyes.

>10:30//

Spell it out. You got it right earlier.

>Fluttershy’s face sagged as she hugged a ficus. She just sighed.//

Why? She should be enjoying this, right?

>By the time Twilight made it home, Her brain//

Capitalization.

>the telltale pitter-patter of dragon claws against woods.//

He's… running through the forest?

>She grit her teeth.//

Gritted.

>Gritting her teeth//

And she just did that. It's a common enough action in writing. Beware overusing it.

>T-There//

Think about what sound she would actually be repeating.

>affixing her daughter with a steady gaze//

Phrasing is off here. The direct object of "affix" should be the object being attached. I wonder if you didn't mean "fixed," though.

>Both Velvet, whose mane had been thrown into a mess, and Spike, who was smothered in dust, walked outside to watch Twilight fly off into the night. Their faces were blank.//

By now, I'm noticing an awful lot of "to be" verbs. You need to be choosing more active verbs. This one is inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about things happening, not just being.

>may-or-may-not//

That's not a hyphenated phrase.

>1//

Spell it out.

>He laid on the floor//

More lay/lie confusion.

>He let out a loud groan as all the furniture in the room slid across the floor, just inadvertently dodging his wife's vanity cabinet.//

This one truly is ambiguous. Is he dodging the vanity, or is the furniture doing it? Grammatically speaking, you're saying the latter.

>S-She//

Same as before—what sound would actually be repeated?

>thump//

Same as before. It's a normal word. Just use it regularly.

>Twilight’s teeth were gritted.//

She does that a lot…

>now shattered//

Now's when you need a hyphen.

>She noticed that, laying on the desk//

More lay/lie confusion. I think all of them I've seen so far are wrong.

>cast her spell, sending the letter-turned-smoke flying out into the air//

She's never done that before… That's Spike's thing.

>Unicorn foals were playing in street below//

Missing word.

>before lying down on her bed//

There you go! Got one right.

>in anyway I can//

In this usage, "any way" should be two words.

>She trailed off,//

You don't need to point this out. I can already tell from the punctuation.

>enforce her barbaric ‘bedtimes’ onto you//

The typical phrasing would just be "on."

>back-and-forth//

Unneeded hyphenation.

>laughing stock//

One word.

>She collapsed into a gaseous form again, and floated past the two mares and out the barred window.//

Missing line break and unnecessary comma (there's no new clause).

>ever-so-slightly//

Unneeded hyphenation.

>she laid her head on the counter//

That one's right too. Getting better at it as you go along.

>Donut Joe//

Wait, this is in Canterlot? What are Lyra and Bon Bon doing there?

>Es tut mir leid.//

In German, all nouns are capitalized. "Es tut mir Leid."

>SMASH//

And this is an egregious example. Just describe the sound.

>Sparkles//

I guess I don't understand why she's taunting Twilight. Yes, she feels left out on the secret, but Velvet was the one giving her grief for it.

Really there's not much wrong here. The only pervasive things I'd say are the abundance of participles and "to be" verbs. Just give this a clean-up pass while you're waiting for it to go through the posting queue.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity wrapped her forelegs around the small tree, wincing as the sap melded into her fur.//</span><br />Watch the participles. First, writers tend to overuse them, and I already see three in just the first seven sentences. But this one&#039;s also a misplaced modifier. It wants to describe the nearest prior object, so it sounds like the tree is wincing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I-Is//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>squish</i>//</span><br />Lose the italics. Narration isn&#039;t the place for sound effects, but it&#039;s a valid word anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;grit teeth//</span><br />The only accepted past tense of this is &quot;gritted.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;out-of-sight//</span><br />You only need the hyphenation when the phrase modifies something that&#039;s right next to it. You don&#039;t need it for a predicate adjective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;R-Right, mom.//</span><br />Again, only capitalize the first. And when using &quot;Mom&quot; as a term of address or like a name (versus a more generic usage, like &quot;my mom&quot;), capitalize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As soon as she was out-of-sight//</span><br />Same deal with the hyphenation. I tend to point out only two or three instances, then leave the rest for the writer to find. And so I turn it over to you.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Velvet was laying calmly and jabbering excitedly//</span><br />Three problems here. First, keep an eye on the telly language. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s hurting here, but it&#039;s popped up occasionally. Second, you&#039;ve confused lay/lie. And third, you&#039;re using a lot of these past participles, like &quot;was [lying].&quot; There is a time and place for that tense, but using it too much is unwieldy, and having that &quot;to be&quot; auxiliary verb saps the action from your main verb. Really consider whether this is necessary. I think the previous instance was, but this one isn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;along–except//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;go—//</span><br />Be consistent in your dash usage.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smiled.//</span><br />I&#039;m only a couple of screens in, and this is already the 8th time you&#039;ve used this action. It&#039;s getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mom!//</span><br />Again, capitalize it as a term of address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And in the center of it all was Pinkie Pie, bags hanging from her eyes, diligently mopping the floors.//</span><br />Another misplace modifier. The &quot;diligently mopping…&quot; is so far from what it describes that it seems to refer to her eyes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;10:30//</span><br />Spell it out. You got it right earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy’s face sagged as she hugged a ficus. She just sighed.//</span><br />Why? She should be enjoying this, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;By the time Twilight made it home, Her brain//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the telltale pitter-patter of dragon claws against woods.//</span><br />He&#039;s… running through the forest?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She grit her teeth.//</span><br />Gritted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gritting her teeth//</span><br />And she just did that. It&#039;s a common enough action in writing. Beware overusing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-There//</span><br />Think about what sound she would actually be repeating.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;affixing her daughter with a steady gaze//</span><br />Phrasing is off here. The direct object of &quot;affix&quot; should be the object being attached. I wonder if you didn&#039;t mean &quot;fixed,&quot; though.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Both Velvet, whose mane had been thrown into a mess, and Spike, who was smothered in dust, walked outside to watch Twilight fly off into the night. Their faces were blank.//</span><br />By now, I&#039;m noticing an awful lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You need to be choosing more active verbs. This one is inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about things happening, not just being.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;may-or-may-not//</span><br />That&#039;s not a hyphenated phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;1//</span><br />Spell it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He laid on the floor//</span><br />More lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He let out a loud groan as all the furniture in the room slid across the floor, just inadvertently dodging his wife&#039;s vanity cabinet.//</span><br />This one truly is ambiguous. Is he dodging the vanity, or is the furniture doing it? Grammatically speaking, you&#039;re saying the latter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S-She//</span><br />Same as before—what sound would actually be repeated?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>thump</i>//</span><br />Same as before. It&#039;s a normal word. Just use it regularly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s teeth were gritted.//</span><br />She does that a lot…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now shattered//</span><br />Now&#039;s when you need a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She noticed that, laying on the desk//</span><br />More lay/lie confusion. I think all of them I&#039;ve seen so far are wrong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cast her spell, sending the letter-turned-smoke flying out into the air//</span><br />She&#039;s never done that before… That&#039;s Spike&#039;s thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Unicorn foals were playing in street below//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;before lying down on her bed//</span><br />There you go! Got one right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in anyway I can//</span><br />In this usage, &quot;any way&quot; should be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trailed off,//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to point this out. I can already tell from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;enforce her barbaric ‘bedtimes’ onto you//</span><br />The typical phrasing would just be &quot;on.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back-and-forth//</span><br />Unneeded hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laughing stock//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She collapsed into a gaseous form again, and floated past the two mares and out the barred window.//</span><br />Missing line break and unnecessary comma (there&#039;s no new clause).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ever-so-slightly//</span><br />Unneeded hyphenation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she laid her head on the counter//</span><br />That one&#039;s right too. Getting better at it as you go along.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Donut Joe//</span><br />Wait, this is in Canterlot? What are Lyra and Bon Bon doing there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Es tut mir leid.//</span><br />In German, all nouns are capitalized. &quot;Es tut mir Leid.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>SMASH</i>//</span><br />And this is an egregious example. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sparkles//</span><br />I guess I don&#039;t understand why she&#039;s taunting Twilight. Yes, she feels left out on the secret, but Velvet was the one giving her grief for it.<br /><br />Really there&#039;s not much wrong here. The only pervasive things I&#039;d say are the abundance of participles and &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Just give this a clean-up pass while you&#039;re waiting for it to go through the posting queue.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 154

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>silver blue//

Needs a hyphen.

>out-of-place//

And in this usage, you don't need the hyphens.

>Luna saw something out-of-place in this dream world, and knew she had found what she sought.//

You don't need that comma, because you haven't begun a new clause. It's just a second verb for the original subject. You do this a number of times.

>…nopony//

Capitalize when it's not picking up from an earlier sentence that trailed off. You do this a number of times. There are also specific times when a leading ellipsis is even appropriate, so watch how often you do this.

>Why do you lay here alone?//

Lay/lie confusion.

>The filly’s anger faded//

You're on the edge of doing a bit much telling in a couple of places I've seen so far. It fits the mood of the story thus far, which is why I'm giving you some leeway, but when you have a moment where you really want the reader to identify with the character, showing is the way to go. You do so afterward by taking me through some of her body language, but that becomes redundant when you've already told me how she feels.

>Now it made sense, this was a dream she was quite familiar with.//

Comma splice.

>Everypony gets their cutie mark in their own time, you should not think you are alone just because you have yet to receive yours.//

And again.

>B-But//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a proper noun.

>Luna watched, her smile growing//

This is the first time in a while that I see any action from Luna. You describe Diamond Tiara's body language well enough, but if all Luna does is speak for long stretches, she comes across as cold and emotionless, which isn't the image I gather you were trying to create for her.

This was not a bad story. It's well below our requirements of 2500 words for a one-shot, but we can waive that if we feel the story is good enough. I'd consider doing so, but the conflict resolution is pretty weak here, so it's not a case where I feel that additional word count wouldn't improve the story. There are a couple of questions I'd have about your version of Luna's dream-viewing capability, but that's not germane to the story's quality.

There are a few things that still stand out to me, though. Are you implying that Diamond Tiara is having a change of heart here? If she's that self-aware of her bullying, then does she intend to stop it? It seems like this could have been yet another teaching point for Luna, though it'd obviously cause some discrepancies with canon if this is supposed to take place during the show. Another is that it undercuts the sense of conflict to the story, given how easily Luna solved her problem. It feels more like she found the answer to a vexing question than she underwent some kind of fundamental character change.

This was an interesting interpretation on her character, but it might require some explanation of why she continues to be unkind to her classmates in canon when it seems to trouble her here. I'd also encourage you to invest her dilemma with more gravity than something Luna can solve so quickly. It begs the question of why Diamond Tiara wouldn't have been able to figure out something that simple herself or get someone like her dad or Cheerilee to help. In fact, Luna would probably assume she had, so asking about it would help her narrow down what argument to make. These are just a few ideas I'm tossing out there. Do what you like, but I do think you need to give the conflict more apparent weight.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;silver blue//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;out-of-place//</span><br />And in this usage, you don&#039;t need the hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna saw something out-of-place in this dream world, and knew she had found what she sought.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that comma, because you haven&#039;t begun a new clause. It&#039;s just a second verb for the original subject. You do this a number of times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…nopony//</span><br />Capitalize when it&#039;s not picking up from an earlier sentence that trailed off. You do this a number of times. There are also specific times when a leading ellipsis is even appropriate, so watch how often you do this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why do you lay here alone?//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The filly’s anger faded//</span><br />You&#039;re on the edge of doing a bit much telling in a couple of places I&#039;ve seen so far. It fits the mood of the story thus far, which is why I&#039;m giving you some leeway, but when you have a moment where you really want the reader to identify with the character, showing is the way to go. You do so afterward by taking me through some of her body language, but that becomes redundant when you&#039;ve already told me how she feels.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now it made sense, this was a dream she was quite familiar with.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everypony gets their cutie mark in their own time, you should not think you are alone just because you have yet to receive yours.//</span><br />And again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;B-But//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna watched, her smile growing//</span><br />This is the first time in a while that I see any action from Luna. You describe Diamond Tiara&#039;s body language well enough, but if all Luna does is speak for long stretches, she comes across as cold and emotionless, which isn&#039;t the image I gather you were trying to create for her.<br /><br />This was not a bad story. It&#039;s well below our requirements of 2500 words for a one-shot, but we can waive that if we feel the story is good enough. I&#039;d consider doing so, but the conflict resolution is pretty weak here, so it&#039;s not a case where I feel that additional word count wouldn&#039;t improve the story. There are a couple of questions I&#039;d have about your version of Luna&#039;s dream-viewing capability, but that&#039;s not germane to the story&#039;s quality.<br /><br />There are a few things that still stand out to me, though. Are you implying that Diamond Tiara is having a change of heart here? If she&#039;s that self-aware of her bullying, then does she intend to stop it? It seems like this could have been yet another teaching point for Luna, though it&#039;d obviously cause some discrepancies with canon if this is supposed to take place during the show. Another is that it undercuts the sense of conflict to the story, given how easily Luna solved her problem. It feels more like she found the answer to a vexing question than she underwent some kind of fundamental character change.<br /><br />This was an interesting interpretation on her character, but it might require some explanation of why she continues to be unkind to her classmates in canon when it seems to trouble her here. I&#039;d also encourage you to invest her dilemma with more gravity than something Luna can solve so quickly. It begs the question of why Diamond Tiara wouldn&#039;t have been able to figure out something that simple herself or get someone like her dad or Cheerilee to help. In fact, Luna would probably assume she had, so asking about it would help her narrow down what argument to make. These are just a few ideas I&#039;m tossing out there. Do what you like, but I do think you need to give the conflict more apparent weight.<br />

SkyTrip !DSxWlQ2A1cCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 155

I'm sorry if I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to find any way to submit a story to you for a review request. Is there anywhere you can redirect me so I can send you my work so far? That is, if you're still doing these reviews.
I&#039;m sorry if I&#039;m missing something obvious here, but I can&#039;t seem to find any way to submit a story to you for a review request. Is there anywhere you can redirect me so I can send you my work so far? That is, if you&#039;re still doing these reviews.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 156

>>129964
Hello, I'm the author of this fic. I've revised the story a bit, increased the world count and expanded the interactions. My only question now is, do I need to re-submit it to be considered again?<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129964" onclick="return highlight('129964', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129964">&gt;&gt;129964</a><br />Hello, I&#039;m the author of this fic. I&#039;ve revised the story a bit, increased the world count and expanded the interactions. My only question now is, do I need to re-submit it to be considered again?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 157

>>129977
This is not a general review thread. This is feedback for stories that were submitted to Equestria Daily.

>>129978

Yes, resubmit through Equestria Daily's form.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129977" onclick="return highlight('129977', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129977">&gt;&gt;129977</a><br />This is not a general review thread. This is feedback for stories that were submitted to Equestria Daily.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129978" onclick="return highlight('129978', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129978">&gt;&gt;129978</a><br />Yes, resubmit through Equestria Daily&#039;s form.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 158

>>129981
Thank you.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129981" onclick="return highlight('129981', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129981">&gt;&gt;129981</a><br />Thank you.<br />

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 159

>>129891

Hi,

Author of the piece here. Hope I'm getting this messageboard thing right.

A few replies, then:

>I was going to chide you for the preceding infodump, but I decided to let it slide. Then you went and made it superfluous…//


I don't know whether this is a criticism or not. Regardless, the situation plays out like this: Pinkie is ignorant about something. She asks Rarity, so Rarity, being excited about, tells her and gets a little carried away before realising it's something Pinkie should know. I'm not really sure what's wrong with that.

>Overblown lines like this really stretch the story's credibility.//

Are you saying it's out of character for Rarity to be excessively dramatic when she's excited?

That's all for the line-by-line comments. The rest are good, and I appreciate you taking the time to mention the small things. Now, onto the meaty things:

Well, I can cheerfully assure you there won't be any sex scenes. I don't know how strict the EQD policy is on this – the closest we're going to get is a few references, maybe edging onto fade-to-black stuff (though that's negotiable).

If there's a sticking point, it's going to be this:

> it doesn't absolve you of the need to justify the relationship. It's not enough to throw the two characters together, have them act lovey-dovey, and expect me to believe they work well together or care about them.//


I confess, I'm not sure what you're looking for here. Your comments indicate you want to see the events earlier than the first chapter. But this wouldn't justify the character's feelings by any meaningful definition of the word, nor would it be very sensible – every piece of fiction has to present some events as given. Nothing could ever get started except at the beginning of the universe otherwise.

If you want to see evidence that they love each other, well – right now, they don't. As of the first chapter, they fancy each other. The purpose of the story as a whole is to show that they can love each other (in the sense that they can learn to get along and find value in a relationship that outweighs the differences they have). I can't show that at the start without undercutting the story.

If you want to see evidence that they fancy each other …

>But look at what we get: Pinkie goes to Rarity's, keeps ogling her, and then she yearns to kiss Rarity without any sort of supporting evidence as to why she'd feel this way. And then, of course, Rarity instantly reciprocates, because everything's always rosy in real romance. Neither one suspected how the other felt, but they conveniently feel the same way at the same time, and kissing someone when you have no idea if they want it is always a good idea, right?//


I know this this is ponyfic review and you're obliged to make at least one snide remark before you finish, but this is kinda daft. The supporting evidence worry I've dealt with above (to the degree that I can interpret it). Feeling the same way at the same time is kind of a necessary prerequisite for romance in general. in the real world too. If it didn't happen often, we'd all be screwed.

And you might want to check your caricature. Putting aside the increasing intimacy before the kiss, there are loads of points that indicate Rarity fancies Pinkie. Obviously I can't mention that explicitly, because we're in Pinkie's POV, but it's not subtle. If you can't see that, then I'm at a loss.

So that's our sticking point. I can give you the plot summary and the draft of the next chapter, but with your issues about justification, I don't know if that would do much good.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129891" onclick="return highlight('129891', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129891">&gt;&gt;129891</a><br /><br />Hi,<br /><br />Author of the piece here. Hope I&#039;m getting this messageboard thing right.<br /><br />A few replies, then:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was going to chide you for the preceding infodump, but I decided to let it slide. Then you went and made it superfluous…//</span><br /><br />I don&#039;t know whether this is a criticism or not. Regardless, the situation plays out like this: Pinkie is ignorant about something. She asks Rarity, so Rarity, being excited about, tells her and gets a little carried away before realising it&#039;s something Pinkie should know. I&#039;m not really sure what&#039;s wrong with that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Overblown lines like this really stretch the story&#039;s credibility.//</span><br />Are you saying it&#039;s out of character for Rarity to be excessively dramatic when she&#039;s excited?<br /><br />That&#039;s all for the line-by-line comments. The rest are good, and I appreciate you taking the time to mention the small things. Now, onto the meaty things:<br /><br />Well, I can cheerfully assure you there won&#039;t be any sex scenes. I don&#039;t know how strict the EQD policy is on this – the closest we&#039;re going to get is a few references, maybe edging onto fade-to-black stuff (though that&#039;s negotiable).<br /><br />If there&#039;s a sticking point, it&#039;s going to be this: <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; it doesn&#039;t absolve you of the need to justify the relationship. It&#039;s not enough to throw the two characters together, have them act lovey-dovey, and expect me to believe they work well together or care about them.//</span><br /><br />I confess, I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re looking for here. Your comments indicate you want to see the events earlier than the first chapter. But this wouldn&#039;t justify the character&#039;s feelings by any meaningful definition of the word, nor would it be very sensible – every piece of fiction has to present some events as given. Nothing could ever get started except at the beginning of the universe otherwise.<br /><br />If you want to see evidence that they love each other, well – right now, they don&#039;t. As of the first chapter, they fancy each other. The purpose of the story as a whole is to show that they can love each other (in the sense that they can learn to get along and find value in a relationship that outweighs the differences they have). I can&#039;t show that at the start without undercutting the story.<br /><br />If you want to see evidence that they fancy each other … <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But look at what we get: Pinkie goes to Rarity&#039;s, keeps ogling her, and then she yearns to kiss Rarity without any sort of supporting evidence as to why she&#039;d feel this way. And then, of course, Rarity instantly reciprocates, because everything&#039;s always rosy in real romance. Neither one suspected how the other felt, but they conveniently feel the same way at the same time, and kissing someone when you have no idea if they want it is always a good idea, right?//</span><br /><br />I know this this is ponyfic review and you&#039;re obliged to make at least one snide remark before you finish, but this is kinda daft. The supporting evidence worry I&#039;ve dealt with above (to the degree that I can interpret it). Feeling the same way at the same time is kind of a necessary prerequisite for romance in general. in the real world too. If it didn&#039;t happen often, we&#039;d all be screwed.<br /><br />And you might want to check your caricature. Putting aside the increasing intimacy before the kiss, there are loads of points that indicate Rarity fancies Pinkie. Obviously I can&#039;t mention that explicitly, because we&#039;re in Pinkie&#039;s POV, but it&#039;s not subtle. If you can&#039;t see that, then I&#039;m at a loss.<br /><br />So that&#039;s our sticking point. I can give you the plot summary and the draft of the next chapter, but with your issues about justification, I don&#039;t know if that would do much good.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 160

>>130018
>I don't know whether this is a criticism or not. Regardless, the situation plays out like this: Pinkie is ignorant about something. She asks Rarity, so Rarity, being excited about, tells her and gets a little carried away before realising it's something Pinkie should know. I'm not really sure what's wrong with that.
The problem here is that it's unbelievable that Rarity would go off on that tangent. It's purely for the benefit of the reader. She wouldn't say this in a real conversation. You don't explain a subject thoroughly, and then ponder that the person to whom you're speaking would already know the information. And by calling attention to that, she's undercutting her own motivation for saying it, because she's basically admitting that she should have known not to.

>Are you saying it's out of character for Rarity to be excessively dramatic when she's excited?

No, I'm saying that it's a poor match for the tone you're striking through the rest of the story. Maybe you intend to take it in a more silly and random direction in future chapters, but in this one, you've created a serious atmosphere. Lines like this then stick out like a joke at a funeral.

>Your comments indicate you want to see the events earlier than the first chapter. But this wouldn't justify the character's feelings by any meaningful definition of the word, nor would it be very sensible – every piece of fiction has to present some events as given. Nothing could ever get started except at the beginning of the universe otherwise.

>And you might want to check your caricature. Putting aside the increasing intimacy before the kiss, there are loads of points that indicate Rarity fancies Pinkie. Obviously I can't mention that explicitly, because we're in Pinkie's POV, but it's not subtle. If you can't see that, then I'm at a loss.
>Feeling the same way at the same time is kind of a necessary prerequisite for romance in general. in the real world too. If it didn't happen often, we'd all be screwed.
I'll deal with these all together.

That's not what I'm saying at all, and I explicitly led you through other methods to establish a relationship besides starting at the beginning (not of the universe, though I was hoping that went without saying): via flashback or implication and anecdote. I also said this was linked to where in their relationship they are. If a story deals with a couple long after they've gotten together, then implication and anecdote are the best ways to go. Show the couple basically acting like an old couple, what with all the rapport, inside jokes, and habits that entails. That's how you create chemistry. There aren't such things at the beginning of a romantic relationship, because the characters are still sorting things out, so it takes a different play. One is to show the action leading from the initial attraction to finally getting together. Another is inserting enough flashbacks of important moments in their development to make it well-rounded. And the last is basically a shorthand way of doing flashbacks, like recalling brief images or symbols tied to their important memories together. Pinkie might remark that for years, she's smiled at a special bracelet Rarity made for her every time she sees it. This is supporting material for the relationship.

This is also the most common mistake in shipping stories. It's the difference between a good story and a superficial one. Take the movie Tangled. Flynn and Rapunzel are obviously supposed to be attractive characters, but they aren't exactly drawn to each other immediately. There's a certain amount of curiosity, but not any romance. Each just wants to use the other to achieve some end, but along the way, they notice things about the other that they find endearing. Flynn comes to love her naivete and her childlike wonder. When he sees her dancing at the festival, he finally notices her beyond the one who's keeping the crown he wants. Then when he watches her staring at all the lanterns in the sky, it sinks in. She's everything he is not, and it's what he's been missing in his life. She must notice this. At first, he tried to hustle her along and get the whole thing over with. But by the dance scene, he's not rushing her anymore. She can see the way he looks at her, and then he goes out of his way to give her an exquisite view of the lanterns. She's not dumb. Inexperienced, yes, but she can tell what's going on. And when they (almost) kiss, it's a mutual decision, and neither one questions whether it's right.

Now compare that to the usual pablum that airs on the Hallmark Channel. Two people share a glance at the market, and they're instantly in love, but neither one knows it. They may have a clumsy dinner where nothing goes right, one of them apologizes for it, and the other initiates a kiss, unprompted. Which of those do you think is more memorable?

We see so many romance stories, and the majority follow the latter scheme. It's not that you don't have any outward signs of attraction. It's that none of it convinces me there's anything more here than shallow flirting. There's nothing to convince me that they love each other. No, you don't have to tell Flynn and Rapunzel's story from the beginning. You can dedicate a scene to having Flynn remember the night they went out in the boat. You can simply have Rapunzel see a flower in the vase in their house years later, and then she spends a couple of sentences reminiscing about the time the little girls did her hair up in flowers and Flynn twirled her around in the market square until her feet hurt.

Yes, feeling love at the same time is (usually) necessary for romance, but the real story lies in discovering this fact. You've had Pinkie oblivious to Rarity's signs. At least I read it that way, but you've confirmed it. People who are oblivious as to whether the objects of their affection like them back would try and get at the information. They'd lead the conversation in that direction, maybe get a gift for the other and see how they react, maybe ask them out. They don't wonder "Does she have any feelings for me at all?" and immediately kiss them. That's a good way to get slapped, or at least possibly squelch any reciprocation by being too aggressive. Reasonable people just don't do that. If Pinkie feels that strongly, is that a risk she's willing to take? There are no extenuating circumstances to suggest she had any compelling reason to do so. Rarity's not dying. She's not about to take up with someone else. If Pinkie plays it slower, what would it cost her? Nothing that I can see.

>I know this this is ponyfic review and you're obliged to make at least one snide remark before you finish//

First, I was very complimentary to your story, so I'm not sure what effect you're trying to achieve with passive-aggressive comments. It's not going to incite me to help you any more than I already have, but here I've gone and done it anyway. Make no mistake: my job is to find good stories to post on EqD. If I can help your story become one of those, fine. If not, then it'll save both of us some time. I was being snide to drive home the point that I see this problem of ridiculously convenient circumstances with stories all the time, and you're not going to rise above the masses without addressing it. You can't submit your story to a forum where criticism is implicit, then get thin-skinned when you receive it. This is rather tame, anyway. Try Nicknack's thread if you want some real tough love.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130018" onclick="return highlight('130018', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130018">&gt;&gt;130018</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t know whether this is a criticism or not. Regardless, the situation plays out like this: Pinkie is ignorant about something. She asks Rarity, so Rarity, being excited about, tells her and gets a little carried away before realising it&#039;s something Pinkie should know. I&#039;m not really sure what&#039;s wrong with that.</span><br />The problem here is that it&#039;s unbelievable that Rarity would go off on that tangent. It&#039;s purely for the benefit of the reader. She wouldn&#039;t say this in a real conversation. You don&#039;t explain a subject thoroughly, and then ponder that the person to whom you&#039;re speaking would already know the information. And by calling attention to that, she&#039;s undercutting her own motivation for saying it, because she&#039;s basically admitting that she should have known not to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Are you saying it&#039;s out of character for Rarity to be excessively dramatic when she&#039;s excited?</span><br />No, I&#039;m saying that it&#039;s a poor match for the tone you&#039;re striking through the rest of the story. Maybe you intend to take it in a more silly and random direction in future chapters, but in this one, you&#039;ve created a serious atmosphere. Lines like this then stick out like a joke at a funeral.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your comments indicate you want to see the events earlier than the first chapter. But this wouldn&#039;t justify the character&#039;s feelings by any meaningful definition of the word, nor would it be very sensible – every piece of fiction has to present some events as given. Nothing could ever get started except at the beginning of the universe otherwise.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And you might want to check your caricature. Putting aside the increasing intimacy before the kiss, there are loads of points that indicate Rarity fancies Pinkie. Obviously I can&#039;t mention that explicitly, because we&#039;re in Pinkie&#039;s POV, but it&#039;s not subtle. If you can&#039;t see that, then I&#039;m at a loss.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Feeling the same way at the same time is kind of a necessary prerequisite for romance in general. in the real world too. If it didn&#039;t happen often, we&#039;d all be screwed.</span><br />I&#039;ll deal with these all together.<br /><br />That&#039;s not what I&#039;m saying at all, and I explicitly led you through other methods to establish a relationship besides starting at the beginning (not of the universe, though I was hoping that went without saying): via flashback or implication and anecdote. I also said this was linked to where in their relationship they are. If a story deals with a couple long after they&#039;ve gotten together, then implication and anecdote are the best ways to go. Show the couple basically acting like an old couple, what with all the rapport, inside jokes, and habits that entails. That&#039;s how you create chemistry. There aren&#039;t such things at the beginning of a romantic relationship, because the characters are still sorting things out, so it takes a different play. One is to show the action leading from the initial attraction to finally getting together. Another is inserting enough flashbacks of important moments in their development to make it well-rounded. And the last is basically a shorthand way of doing flashbacks, like recalling brief images or symbols tied to their important memories together. Pinkie might remark that for years, she&#039;s smiled at a special bracelet Rarity made for her every time she sees it. This is supporting material for the relationship.<br /><br />This is also the most common mistake in shipping stories. It&#039;s the difference between a good story and a superficial one. Take the movie <i>Tangled</i>. Flynn and Rapunzel are obviously supposed to be attractive characters, but they aren&#039;t exactly drawn to each other immediately. There&#039;s a certain amount of curiosity, but not any romance. Each just wants to use the other to achieve some end, but along the way, they notice things about the other that they find endearing. Flynn comes to love her naivete and her childlike wonder. When he sees her dancing at the festival, he finally notices her beyond the one who&#039;s keeping the crown he wants. Then when he watches her staring at all the lanterns in the sky, it sinks in. She&#039;s everything he is not, and it&#039;s what he&#039;s been missing in his life. She must notice this. At first, he tried to hustle her along and get the whole thing over with. But by the dance scene, he&#039;s not rushing her anymore. She can see the way he looks at her, and then he goes out of his way to give her an exquisite view of the lanterns. She&#039;s not dumb. Inexperienced, yes, but she can tell what&#039;s going on. And when they (almost) kiss, it&#039;s a mutual decision, and neither one questions whether it&#039;s right.<br /><br />Now compare that to the usual pablum that airs on the Hallmark Channel. Two people share a glance at the market, and they&#039;re instantly in love, but neither one knows it. They may have a clumsy dinner where nothing goes right, one of them apologizes for it, and the other initiates a kiss, unprompted. Which of those do you think is more memorable?<br /><br />We see so many romance stories, and the majority follow the latter scheme. It&#039;s not that you don&#039;t have any outward signs of attraction. It&#039;s that none of it convinces me there&#039;s anything more here than shallow flirting. There&#039;s nothing to convince me that they <i>love</i> each other. No, you don&#039;t have to tell Flynn and Rapunzel&#039;s story from the beginning. You can dedicate a scene to having Flynn remember the night they went out in the boat. You can simply have Rapunzel see a flower in the vase in their house years later, and then she spends a couple of sentences reminiscing about the time the little girls did her hair up in flowers and Flynn twirled her around in the market square until her feet hurt.<br /><br />Yes, feeling love at the same time is (usually) necessary for romance, but the real story lies in discovering this fact. You&#039;ve had Pinkie oblivious to Rarity&#039;s signs. At least I read it that way, but you&#039;ve confirmed it. People who are oblivious as to whether the objects of their affection like them back would try and get at the information. They&#039;d lead the conversation in that direction, maybe get a gift for the other and see how they react, maybe ask them out. They don&#039;t wonder &quot;Does she have any feelings for me at all?&quot; and immediately kiss them. That&#039;s a good way to get slapped, or at least possibly squelch any reciprocation by being too aggressive. Reasonable people just don&#039;t do that. If Pinkie feels that strongly, is that a risk she&#039;s willing to take? There are no extenuating circumstances to suggest she had any compelling reason to do so. Rarity&#039;s not dying. She&#039;s not about to take up with someone else. If Pinkie plays it slower, what would it cost her? Nothing that I can see.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know this this is ponyfic review and you&#039;re obliged to make at least one snide remark before you finish//</span><br />First, I was very complimentary to your story, so I&#039;m not sure what effect you&#039;re trying to achieve with passive-aggressive comments. It&#039;s not going to incite me to help you any more than I already have, but here I&#039;ve gone and done it anyway. Make no mistake: my job is to find good stories to post on EqD. If I can help your story become one of those, fine. If not, then it&#039;ll save both of us some time. I was being snide to drive home the point that I see this problem of ridiculously convenient circumstances with stories all the time, and you&#039;re not going to rise above the masses without addressing it. You can&#039;t submit your story to a forum where criticism is implicit, then get thin-skinned when you receive it. This is rather tame, anyway. Try Nicknack&#039;s thread if you want some <i>real</i> tough love.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 161

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>You're going to need to know what an orrery is.//

This is a mistake. One of the cardinal rules of using jargon is to give the context of what it means. If the first thing the reader has to do is click away from your story, that's a bad thing. It wouldn't be hard to define what an orrery is by example in the story. Edit: and it ends up that you do. So why have this here? It's a huge immersion-breaking thing before I even start the story.

>Sproing!//

And then the first actual word. Don't put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

>Speaking of the timepieces, there was a superfluous amount of them//

"Amount" is used for collective quantities. You want "number," which is also considered plural, so you'll need to match the verb to it.

>if you just so happened//

It's best to avoid addressing the reader, unless you intend to make the reader a character as well and define his role in being there.

>in the habit of making your loaves of bread in the shape of orreries//

While amusing, this is out of place, as it's irrelevant to his comment about the size of the thing. By this point, you've also tallied 15 "to be" verbs in only a few paragraphs. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. They're also sapping all the action from the story. It's a good idea to keep their ue to a minimum anyway, but especially at the beginning of the story, where you want to grab the reader's interest.

>one thousand, two hundred and sixty five//

One thousand two hundred sixty-five. I can forgive him for using improper phrasing, since it might not be his expertise, but you at lease need to spell it right with the hyphen. Same with the instance later in the paragraph.

>Sighing, I opened a drawer in my workbench, carefully removing a simple wooden box.//

Watch the participles. There are two problems here that are common for them. First, they imply concurrent action, so both of them synchronize their actions with the main verb. I get the sense that he would sigh first or at the same time he opens the drawer, but he can't remove the box while he's still opening the drawer. So be careful of the implied time progression. The other issue is that participles like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start a clause; then, they modify that clause's subject. So this says the workbench is removing the box. It's easy to apply a little logic to sort this out, but if you aren't wary of this structure, you'll eventually write something that's ambiguous or misleading. Say that instead of the workbench, you had a character's name there. I wouldn't know which one you intended to perform the action.

>pay off in the end; not necessarily//

This semicolon is misused. There isn't an independent clause anywhere after it.

>its glow dimming slightly//

This is almost identical to the phrasing you used two paragraphs ago. Watch the repetition.

>miniscule//

And you just used this word not long ago. The more unusual a word is, the more it sticks out when you reuse it.

>a single tear of joy running down my cheek//

This is about the most cliched thing you could have done.

>blaring of my alarm clock//

I was of a mind of an electric clock here, but then you go on to describe the sound as "jingly." "Blaring" connotes a different sound than a ringing.

>I began my job, fixing broken clocks and servicing others.//

Another synchronization issue. He's fixing and servicing multiple clocks at the same time he begins his job. Beginning should only be one of them.

>I rounded a corner and my heart skipped a beat.//

You do this a few times. You can cheat here and there for stylistic reasons, but you generally want to set dependent clauses off with a comma.

>Oh, yeah. I guess I forgot to mention, my name's Gizmo.//

Now you've opened the can of worms I alluded to earlier. This didn't need to be said at all. I can tell that's his name, but now that you've clearly and blatantly involved me in the conversation, I need a motivation to be there, the same as any character would. Why is he telling me this story? What occasion do I have to be with him so he can? Why do I want to hear it? Unless you were prepared to frame the story and justify all this, it might be best to avoid having him speak to me altogether.

>It suits thee well.//

Why are you only going halfway on the old-timey language? The pronouns but not the verbs? (ex: It suiteth thee well.)

>Over those three years we'd actually become pretty good friends.//

>which, for the most part, was kept open to the public by the Princesses//
You're inconsistent at placing commas after introductory elements either is fine, but you ought to keep with one or the other. (Going without is primarily British.)

>Whoa, whoa, whoa. I gotta calm down. I'm sure if I go back and apologize, everything will be alright. These are the Princesses, for pony's sake! It was, therefore, with no small amount of trepidation that I retraced my steps//

Herein lies another problem with addressing me. It can be a tricky prospect to put italicized direct thought in a first-person narration, since the narration itself is essentially that already. But when you have the second statement in a form which connotes telling me the story as a recollection some time after the fact, and then he relates direct thought as direct thought, it loses believability as a method for delivering the information. Tagged direct thought is okay, because it still creates narration of of the thought, if you must. But you've made this a story where the narrator is sitting there telling it to me, so the whole thing has to be credible as a conversation (albeit one-sided), and you can't speak italics, so there has to be some spoken cue for the italics, like an "I thought" tag on it, or better yet, just put it as indirect thought in the narration.

>a faux-leather loveseat in which Princess Luna laid//

Lay/lie confusion.

>placing a hoof gently on her shoulder//

That's awfully forward. I don't see someone touching royalty without permission.

>Everypony still thinks us a monster.//

If you're going to use the royal "We" and "Us," shouldn't you capitalize them?

>She sobbed.//

Yes, and for the third time in four paragraphs, I might add.

>I, like every other pony in this forsaken land//

This sounds awfully rehearsed for something he's scrounging for on the spur of the moment. It's not coming across as natural.

>her face twisted in confusion//

Better to get me to deduce confusion through your description of how she looks and acts than to tell me outright. There's a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread that explains.

>Thou actually thinketh//

So sometimes you do use archaic forms. You need to be consistent, and you need to get them right. "Thou actually thinkest…"

>Yes Ma'am!//

Missing a comma for direct address, and "ma'am" wouldn't be capitalized.

>your Majesty//

The whole thing is an honorific. Capitalize both words.

>The clock's glass facing was completely shattered; the hour hand was lying on the floor and the second hand was bent.//

While the grammar is fine with the semicolon here, I can't say the flow is. A semicolon usually shows two closely related thoughts or a cause-effect relationship. This is more like a list.

>It was good though, the task gave me time to mull over what’d happened.//

Comma splice.

>thou hath//

"Thou hast." C'mon. If you're going to use something in a story that you're not familiar with, do a little research.

>It's a trio of interlocking gears, the largest brass, the smallest gold, and the middle silver.//

How can he tell? They're not actually metal, and their colors are pretty indiscernible from many other metals. Plus they're not particularly strong or durable metals, so wouldn't be the best choice for machine parts.

>We… Trust no word of this incident will leave this study?//

Why is "trust" capitalized? It's a continuation of the sentence, not the beginning of a new one.

>a single tear rolled down her cheek//

Oh, good. Another one of these.

>wits end//

Needs an apostrophe. It doesn't matter whether you treat it as singular or plural.

>What is a horse, anyway?//

You mean like the "Hearts As Strong As Horses" song the CMCs sang in "Flight to the Finish"? And using the word "horseshoe" in many instances? Yeah, they clearly have no idea what a horse is.

>Prench//

They have used the word "French" in canon.

>You know, we are ponies//

How does that change whether or not it's disrespectful to make faces at them?

>The door opened further, admitting her head.//

Her head's already in the room. Wouldn't this be letting it out?

>Her chambers came as no surprise to me//

Just because something isn't moving doesn't mean you can't use an active verb to describe it. Just look at the sheer number of "to be" verbs in this paragraph. Seven total, you use some unneeded passive voice, and you have three "there was/were" phrasings to tell me what's in the room. This paragraph brings any motion the story had to an utter standstill.

>What is it that thou so greatly need to discuss?//

>Now, what doth thou need?//
>thine visit//
>thou hath told me//
>Thy thoughtfulness knows no bounds, it seems.//
>thine misunderstanding//
Archaic language errors again. Seriously, if you're going to use this, learn to do it right.

>It is… Marvelous.//

Same deal with the ellipsis again. You don't capitalize after it unless it necessarily starts a new sentence, but the syntax here allows for a continuation.

>Wouldyoudomethehonorofacompanyingmetolastrance?//

This is very ungainly to read. You don't want to slow the reader down, particularly in this case, since it's the precise opposite of the effect you want to create. Just use the narration or the speaking verb to show how he says it instead of relying on visual effects.

It should be pretty obvious by now what needs work. Learn how to use the archaic language correctly, and take a torch to your "to be" verbs, for starters (a rough count of the most common forms yielded 155 in the first chapter alone. That's a rate of about one every other sentence. This is astronomical (heh). And please stop with the single tears. Basically, if I had to mention anything more than a couple times, it needs attention.

Now, I can understand why you wouldn't know this, since you're new at writing in this fandom. But the generalities of the plot here are ones that we see all the time. This is common for shipping stories, so they have a harder time standing out from the crowd, and that's really what they have to do to get accepted here. You fall into a couple of common pitfalls for such stories. First, the story is all about getting them to that first date, first kiss, marriage proposal, or what have you. That's not where the relationship ends; that's where the interesting part really begins, but stories that have such a stopping point are a dime a dozen. Certainly, the gift he's made for her and the general quality of the writing are points in your favor, but still, the story arc is one we've seen any number of times. What also tends to happen in these stories is that the object of our protagonist's affection immediately and fully reciprocates the feeling, which is not only cliched, but takes away much of the interest in seeing things develop. I never get any picture at all of why she likes him, and from his end, there's nothing more than a physical attraction discussed. It's also very light on the conflict. There are some vague ones: whether he'll work up the courage to ask her out, whether she'll accept, what she'll think of the gift. But the only one that's not a foregone conclusion is how she'll take his initial reaction to her, but it's resolved nearly as quickly as it's introduced, so it has no teeth. What would he have done if she had turned him down? How has either one changed as a result of this experience? We don't know, because we're taken right up to the moment that change might start to occur, then whisked into the future, where we get a nebulous back story that does little besides try to ratchet up the emotion. This is a pleasant enough scene, but it's not really a story with a message to take away.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You&#039;re going to need to know what an orrery is.//</span><br />This is a mistake. One of the cardinal rules of using jargon is to give the context of what it means. If the first thing the reader has to do is click away from your story, that&#039;s a bad thing. It wouldn&#039;t be hard to define what an orrery is by example in the story. Edit: and it ends up that you do. So why have this here? It&#039;s a huge immersion-breaking thing before I even start the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Sproing!</i>//</span><br />And then the first actual word. Don&#039;t put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Speaking of the timepieces, there was a superfluous amount of them//</span><br />&quot;Amount&quot; is used for collective quantities. You want &quot;number,&quot; which is also considered plural, so you&#039;ll need to match the verb to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if you just so happened//</span><br />It&#039;s best to avoid addressing the reader, unless you intend to make the reader a character as well and define his role in being there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in the habit of making your loaves of bread in the shape of orreries//</span><br />While amusing, this is out of place, as it&#039;s irrelevant to his comment about the size of the thing. By this point, you&#039;ve also tallied 15 &quot;to be&quot; verbs in only a few paragraphs. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. They&#039;re also sapping all the action from the story. It&#039;s a good idea to keep their ue to a minimum anyway, but especially at the beginning of the story, where you want to grab the reader&#039;s interest.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one thousand, two hundred and sixty five//</span><br />One thousand two hundred sixty-five. I can forgive him for using improper phrasing, since it might not be his expertise, but you at lease need to spell it right with the hyphen. Same with the instance later in the paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sighing, I opened a drawer in my workbench, carefully removing a simple wooden box.//</span><br />Watch the participles. There are two problems here that are common for them. First, they imply concurrent action, so both of them synchronize their actions with the main verb. I get the sense that he would sigh first or at the same time he opens the drawer, but he can&#039;t remove the box while he&#039;s still opening the drawer. So be careful of the implied time progression. The other issue is that participles like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start a clause; then, they modify that clause&#039;s subject. So this says the workbench is removing the box. It&#039;s easy to apply a little logic to sort this out, but if you aren&#039;t wary of this structure, you&#039;ll eventually write something that&#039;s ambiguous or misleading. Say that instead of the workbench, you had a character&#039;s name there. I wouldn&#039;t know which one you intended to perform the action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pay off in the end; not necessarily//</span><br />This semicolon is misused. There isn&#039;t an independent clause anywhere after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its glow dimming slightly//</span><br />This is almost identical to the phrasing you used two paragraphs ago. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;miniscule//</span><br />And you just used this word not long ago. The more unusual a word is, the more it sticks out when you reuse it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a single tear of joy running down my cheek//</span><br />This is about the most cliched thing you could have done.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blaring of my alarm clock//</span><br />I was of a mind of an electric clock here, but then you go on to describe the sound as &quot;jingly.&quot; &quot;Blaring&quot; connotes a different sound than a ringing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I began my job, fixing broken clocks and servicing others.//</span><br />Another synchronization issue. He&#039;s fixing and servicing multiple clocks at the same time he begins his job. Beginning should only be one of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I rounded a corner and my heart skipped a beat.//</span><br />You do this a few times. You can cheat here and there for stylistic reasons, but you generally want to set dependent clauses off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, yeah. I guess I forgot to mention, my name&#039;s Gizmo.//</span><br />Now you&#039;ve opened the can of worms I alluded to earlier. This didn&#039;t need to be said at all. I can tell that&#039;s his name, but now that you&#039;ve clearly and blatantly involved me in the conversation, I need a motivation to be there, the same as any character would. Why is he telling me this story? What occasion do I have to be with him so he can? Why do I want to hear it? Unless you were prepared to frame the story and justify all this, it might be best to avoid having him speak to me altogether.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It suits thee well.//</span><br />Why are you only going halfway on the old-timey language? The pronouns but not the verbs? (ex: It suiteth thee well.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Over those three years we&#039;d actually become pretty good friends.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which, for the most part, was kept open to the public by the Princesses//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at placing commas after introductory elements either is fine, but you ought to keep with one or the other. (Going without is primarily British.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Whoa, whoa, whoa. I gotta calm down. I&#039;m sure if I go back and apologize, everything will be alright. These are the Princesses, for pony&#039;s sake!</i> It was, therefore, with no small amount of trepidation that I retraced my steps//</span><br />Herein lies another problem with addressing me. It can be a tricky prospect to put italicized direct thought in a first-person narration, since the narration itself is essentially that already. But when you have the second statement in a form which connotes telling me the story as a recollection some time after the fact, and then he relates direct thought <i>as</i> direct thought, it loses believability as a method for delivering the information. Tagged direct thought is okay, because it still creates narration of of the thought, if you must. But you&#039;ve made this a story where the narrator is sitting there telling it to me, so the whole thing has to be credible as a conversation (albeit one-sided), and you can&#039;t speak italics, so there has to be some spoken cue for the italics, like an &quot;I thought&quot; tag on it, or better yet, just put it as indirect thought in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a faux-leather loveseat in which Princess Luna laid//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;placing a hoof gently on her shoulder//</span><br />That&#039;s awfully forward. I don&#039;t see someone touching royalty without permission.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everypony still thinks us a monster.//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to use the royal &quot;We&quot; and &quot;Us,&quot; shouldn&#039;t you capitalize them?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sobbed.//</span><br />Yes, and for the third time in four paragraphs, I might add.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I, like every other pony in this forsaken land//</span><br />This sounds awfully rehearsed for something he&#039;s scrounging for on the spur of the moment. It&#039;s not coming across as natural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her face twisted in confusion//</span><br />Better to get me to deduce confusion through your description of how she looks and acts than to tell me outright. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread that explains.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thou actually thinketh//</span><br />So sometimes you do use archaic forms. You need to be consistent, and you need to get them right. &quot;Thou actually thinkest…&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes Ma&#039;am!//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address, and &quot;ma&#039;am&quot; wouldn&#039;t be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Majesty//</span><br />The whole thing is an honorific. Capitalize both words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The clock&#039;s glass facing was completely shattered; the hour hand was lying on the floor and the second hand was bent.//</span><br />While the grammar is fine with the semicolon here, I can&#039;t say the flow is. A semicolon usually shows two closely related thoughts or a cause-effect relationship. This is more like a list.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was good though, the task gave me time to mull over what’d happened.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thou hath//</span><br />&quot;Thou hast.&quot; C&#039;mon. If you&#039;re going to use something in a story that you&#039;re not familiar with, do a little research.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s a trio of interlocking gears, the largest brass, the smallest gold, and the middle silver.//</span><br />How can he tell? They&#039;re not actually metal, and their colors are pretty indiscernible from many other metals. Plus they&#039;re not particularly strong or durable metals, so wouldn&#039;t be the best choice for machine parts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We… Trust no word of this incident will leave this study?//</span><br />Why is &quot;trust&quot; capitalized? It&#039;s a continuation of the sentence, not the beginning of a new one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a single tear rolled down her cheek//</span><br />Oh, good. Another one of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wits end//</span><br />Needs an apostrophe. It doesn&#039;t matter whether you treat it as singular or plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What is a horse, anyway?//</span><br />You mean like the &quot;Hearts As Strong As Horses&quot; song the CMCs sang in &quot;Flight to the Finish&quot;? And using the word &quot;horseshoe&quot; in many instances? Yeah, they clearly have no idea what a horse is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Prench//</span><br />They have used the word &quot;French&quot; in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You know, we are ponies//</span><br />How does that change whether or not it&#039;s disrespectful to make faces at them?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The door opened further, admitting her head.//</span><br />Her head&#039;s already in the room. Wouldn&#039;t this be letting it out?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her chambers came as no surprise to me//</span><br />Just because something isn&#039;t moving doesn&#039;t mean you can&#039;t use an active verb to describe it. Just look at the sheer number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs in this paragraph. Seven total, you use some unneeded passive voice, and you have three &quot;there was/were&quot; phrasings to tell me what&#039;s in the room. This paragraph brings any motion the story had to an utter standstill.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What is it that thou so greatly need to discuss?//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now, what doth thou need?//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thine visit//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thou hath told me//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thy thoughtfulness knows no bounds, it seems.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thine misunderstanding//</span><br />Archaic language errors again. Seriously, if you&#039;re going to use this, learn to do it right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It is… Marvelous.//</span><br />Same deal with the ellipsis again. You don&#039;t capitalize after it unless it necessarily starts a new sentence, but the syntax here allows for a continuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wouldyoudomethehonorofacompanyingmetolastrance?//</span><br />This is very ungainly to read. You don&#039;t want to slow the reader down, particularly in this case, since it&#039;s the precise opposite of the effect you want to create. Just use the narration or the speaking verb to show how he says it instead of relying on visual effects.<br /><br />It should be pretty obvious by now what needs work. Learn how to use the archaic language correctly, and take a torch to your &quot;to be&quot; verbs, for starters (a rough count of the most common forms yielded 155 in the first chapter alone. That&#039;s a rate of about one every other sentence. This is astronomical (heh). And please stop with the single tears. Basically, if I had to mention anything more than a couple times, it needs attention.<br /><br />Now, I can understand why you wouldn&#039;t know this, since you&#039;re new at writing in this fandom. But the generalities of the plot here are ones that we see all the time. This is common for shipping stories, so they have a harder time standing out from the crowd, and that&#039;s really what they have to do to get accepted here. You fall into a couple of common pitfalls for such stories. First, the story is all about getting them to that first date, first kiss, marriage proposal, or what have you. That&#039;s not where the relationship ends; that&#039;s where the interesting part really begins, but stories that have such a stopping point are a dime a dozen. Certainly, the gift he&#039;s made for her and the general quality of the writing are points in your favor, but still, the story arc is one we&#039;ve seen any number of times. What also tends to happen in these stories is that the object of our protagonist&#039;s affection immediately and fully reciprocates the feeling, which is not only cliched, but takes away much of the interest in seeing things develop. I never get any picture at all of why she likes him, and from his end, there&#039;s nothing more than a physical attraction discussed. It&#039;s also very light on the conflict. There are some vague ones: whether he&#039;ll work up the courage to ask her out, whether she&#039;ll accept, what she&#039;ll think of the gift. But the only one that&#039;s not a foregone conclusion is how she&#039;ll take his initial reaction to her, but it&#039;s resolved nearly as quickly as it&#039;s introduced, so it has no teeth. What would he have done if she had turned him down? How has either one changed as a result of this experience? We don&#039;t know, because we&#039;re taken right up to the moment that change might start to occur, then whisked into the future, where we get a nebulous back story that does little besides try to ratchet up the emotion. This is a pleasant enough scene, but it&#039;s not really a story with a message to take away.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 162

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A stallion pony in Manehattan was dreaming of a cute filly//

Given that stallion → adult and filly → child, this is rather disturbing.

>Luna looked among the children, confused.//

A danger with participles is that in can be ambiguous what they describe. They like to latch onto the nearest prior object when used like his, so you're saying that the children are confused. I believe you meant for Luna to be, though. In any case, it's unclear.

>these children were as happy as could be and the dream was a paradise//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause. There's a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You do this a number of times.

>closed they blended in perfectly//

This is a rather awkward phrasing.

>She knelt on the grass before the filly, drawing her hooves under herself.//

Here's another ambiguous participle. Grammatically speaking, it's the filly who draws her hooves under herself, but I believe you meant Luna.

>The filly glared at the ground and stomped a hoof on it.//

That's an odd action for a pony who isn't standing.

>I bought out all the seats in a restaurants//

Typo.

>her expression, a combination of perplexion and disapproval//

I'm seeing a bit too much of this, too. There's a section at the top of this thread about show versus tell that will explain.

>This filly didn't need lecturing, that wouldn't dispel this nightmare.//

Comma splice.

>"This is your dream," Luna reminded.//

"Remind" is a transitive verb. It requires a direct object.

It's inevitable that some new errors would crop up when you added that much word count to a story, so I'm not surprised at finding new ones to point out.

There are quite a few to be verbs in here. For the easier ones to search on, I counted 86, which is about one every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs and bring the action to a standstill. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You ought to be choosing more active verbs.

I still have an issue with how much Diamond Tiara is actually changed for the experience. You've definitely made some progress on that front, and think the story's improved for it. DT's basically learning two lessons here: how she can effectively use her talent and that she needs to be nicer to her classmates. On the former, Luna makes a nice generalization about how she could do that, but, for example, it might show more of a change on DT's part if she put forth a few ideas of how she might accomplish that. Does anything immediately occur to her that she could do? Her exact reaction will depend on whether you still see her as misguided. This could range from simply saying she wants to pay for a party at the end of the school year to rubbing her hooves together and thinking she'd be the envy of the class if she held a brunch at an exclusive restaurant for them. There are a number of ways you could play it, along with Luna's reaction, from happy to "That's not quite what I meant" to just rolling her eyes and deciding to let it go. On the latter issue, her treatment of her classmates, she's apparently going to apologize to her friends within the dream, but what about real life? Is this just something she' doing because Luna is right there, or has the lesson actually sunk in? Is this something she intends to work on in real life? Certainly, with her personality, I wouldn't expect a sudden and dramatic change of attitude—it's more a case of whether she's just paying lip service or actually got the message.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A stallion pony in Manehattan was dreaming of a cute filly//</span><br />Given that stallion –&gt; adult and filly –&gt; child, this is rather disturbing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna looked among the children, confused.//</span><br />A danger with participles is that in can be ambiguous what they describe. They like to latch onto the nearest prior object when used like his, so you&#039;re saying that the children are confused. I believe you meant for Luna to be, though. In any case, it&#039;s unclear.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;these children were as happy as could be and the dream was a paradise//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause. There&#039;s a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You do this a number of times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;closed they blended in perfectly//</span><br />This is a rather awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She knelt on the grass before the filly, drawing her hooves under herself.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another ambiguous participle. Grammatically speaking, it&#039;s the filly who draws her hooves under herself, but I believe you meant Luna.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The filly glared at the ground and stomped a hoof on it.//</span><br />That&#039;s an odd action for a pony who isn&#039;t standing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I bought out all the seats in a restaurants//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her expression, a combination of perplexion and disapproval//</span><br />I&#039;m seeing a bit too much of this, too. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread about show versus tell that will explain.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This filly didn&#039;t need lecturing, that wouldn&#039;t dispel this nightmare.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;This is your dream,&quot; Luna reminded.//</span><br />&quot;Remind&quot; is a transitive verb. It requires a direct object.<br /><br />It&#039;s inevitable that some new errors would crop up when you added that much word count to a story, so I&#039;m not surprised at finding new ones to point out.<br /><br />There are quite a few to be verbs in here. For the easier ones to search on, I counted 86, which is about one every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs and bring the action to a standstill. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You ought to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />I still have an issue with how much Diamond Tiara is actually changed for the experience. You&#039;ve definitely made some progress on that front, and think the story&#039;s improved for it. DT&#039;s basically learning two lessons here: how she can effectively use her talent and that she needs to be nicer to her classmates. On the former, Luna makes a nice generalization about how she could do that, but, for example, it might show more of a change on DT&#039;s part if she put forth a few ideas of how she might accomplish that. Does anything immediately occur to her that she could do? Her exact reaction will depend on whether you still see her as misguided. This could range from simply saying she wants to pay for a party at the end of the school year to rubbing her hooves together and thinking she&#039;d be the envy of the class if she held a brunch at an exclusive restaurant for them. There are a number of ways you could play it, along with Luna&#039;s reaction, from happy to &quot;That&#039;s not quite what I meant&quot; to just rolling her eyes and deciding to let it go. On the latter issue, her treatment of her classmates, she&#039;s apparently going to apologize to her friends within the dream, but what about real life? Is this just something she&#039; doing because Luna is right there, or has the lesson actually sunk in? Is this something she intends to work on in real life? Certainly, with her personality, I wouldn&#039;t expect a sudden and dramatic change of attitude—it&#039;s more a case of whether she&#039;s just paying lip service or actually got the message.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 163

>>130101
I will take into mind the issues with the story's mechanics. However, I will not revise the content any further than this.

I wanted to leave some things ambiguous and up for reader interpretation, I felt it made the story more thought-provoking and engaging when I left it for readers to think for themselves how this fanfic ties into DT's canon personalities. While I understand you are advising me with intent to improve the story, on my end it is weakening it. It's not the story I wanted to tell anymore.

If this is a problem, I respectfully withdraw it from the ED submissions. I would rather fail my submission and preserve it as I wanted it to be than pass and have readers read something I cannot stand by as an author anymore.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130101" onclick="return highlight('130101', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130101">&gt;&gt;130101</a><br />I will take into mind the issues with the story&#039;s mechanics. However, I will not revise the content any further than this.<br /><br />I wanted to leave some things ambiguous and up for reader interpretation, I felt it made the story more thought-provoking and engaging when I left it for readers to think for themselves how this fanfic ties into DT&#039;s canon personalities. While I understand you are advising me with intent to improve the story, on my end it is weakening it. It&#039;s not the story I wanted to tell anymore.<br /><br />If this is a problem, I respectfully withdraw it from the ED submissions. I would rather fail my submission and preserve it as I wanted it to be than pass and have readers read something I cannot stand by as an author anymore.<br />

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 164

>I'll deal with these all together. … //

Okay, I think we're still miscommunicating. I'll have another go.

As best I can tell, your main issue (putting aside some peripheral stuff) is this:

> It's not that you don't have any outward signs of attraction. It's that none of it convinces me there's anything more here than shallow flirting. There's nothing to convince me that they love each other.//


Well, no. Of course not. They've only just had their first kiss! I don't want you to think they love each other. I want you to think they … well, as I said before, fancy each other. There isn't meant to be anything beyond shallow flirting at this point.

You mention Tangled. I haven't seen it, but from the description, it looks like the same sort of romance you see in the recent spate of Disney/Pixar and Dreamworks films: The leads grate on each other but are forced to work together anyway. They find a few things they like about each other, maybe have a silly argument to increase the tension, then finally get together, kiss, and live happily ever after. From where I'm standing, this isn't realistic in the slightest. They're paint-by-numbers romances, designed to give the audience the warm'n'fuzzies. Now, I don't want to demean these films. Some are excellent. But I see no real love in there.

I'm deliberately avoiding a story like that. I want a story where the first kiss *doesn't* signify love. That comes later. That's what the story as a whole will be about. In some ways, yeah, the story is going to be structurally similar to a get together story – starting off shallow with the trials in the middle forcing the characters to figure out whether they really can love each other – and I'm just moving some of the furniture around to make it better resemble a real life romance. This means that if I were to move true love to the start, I'd undercut the entire structure of the story. There'd be no conflict and no tension, just some stuff that happened.

Maybe I'm being too ambitious. Maybe you think I'm failing to communicate this departure by having the first chapter resemble a crummy get-together tale all by itself … but I'm kinda relying on you, as an experienced pre-reader, to see that *obviously* the first chapter won't have the peak of emotional tension.

>First, I was very complimentary to your story, so I'm not sure what effect you're trying to achieve with passive-aggressive comments./


Woah woah woah. Get off your high horse and back up a moment. It's always a bore when people on the internet take issue with each other's conduct, so I'll keep this short. You were snide. I called you snide. There's no veiled hostility there – the little there is is out in the open.

If you want to know why: Damn nigh everyone seems to feel the need to be a least a little bit unpleasant when criticising someone else's work. Because they think it's witty or it constitutes honesty or some other dumb reason. And I'm frigging tired of it. You were doing pretty well at being forthright without being uncivil until that last bit of sarcasm. To be honest, it came as a bit of a disappointment, so I decided to call you out on it.

<span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;ll deal with these all together. … //</span><br /><br />Okay, I think we&#039;re still miscommunicating. I&#039;ll have another go.<br /><br />As best I can tell, your main issue (putting aside some peripheral stuff) is this: <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; It&#039;s not that you don&#039;t have any outward signs of attraction. It&#039;s that none of it convinces me there&#039;s anything more here than shallow flirting. There&#039;s nothing to convince me that they love each other.//</span><br /><br />Well, no. Of course not. They&#039;ve only just had their first kiss! I don&#039;t want you to think they love each other. I want you to think they … well, as I said before, fancy each other. There isn&#039;t meant to be anything beyond shallow flirting at this point. <br /><br />You mention Tangled. I haven&#039;t seen it, but from the description, it looks like the same sort of romance you see in the recent spate of Disney/Pixar and Dreamworks films: The leads grate on each other but are forced to work together anyway. They find a few things they like about each other, maybe have a silly argument to increase the tension, then finally get together, kiss, and live happily ever after. From where I&#039;m standing, this isn&#039;t realistic in the slightest. They&#039;re paint-by-numbers romances, designed to give the audience the warm&#039;n&#039;fuzzies. Now, I don&#039;t want to demean these films. Some are excellent. But I see no real love in there. <br /><br />I&#039;m deliberately avoiding a story like that. I want a story where the first kiss *doesn&#039;t* signify love. That comes later. That&#039;s what the story as a whole will be about. In some ways, yeah, the story is going to be structurally similar to a get together story – starting off shallow with the trials in the middle forcing the characters to figure out whether they really can love each other – and I&#039;m just moving some of the furniture around to make it better resemble a real life romance. This means that if I were to move true love to the start, I&#039;d undercut the entire structure of the story. There&#039;d be no conflict and no tension, just some stuff that happened.<br /><br />Maybe I&#039;m being too ambitious. Maybe you think I&#039;m failing to communicate this departure by having the first chapter resemble a crummy get-together tale all by itself … but I&#039;m kinda relying on you, as an experienced pre-reader, to see that *obviously* the first chapter won&#039;t have the peak of emotional tension.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;First, I was very complimentary to your story, so I&#039;m not sure what effect you&#039;re trying to achieve with passive-aggressive comments./</span><br /><br />Woah woah woah. Get off your high horse and back up a moment. It&#039;s always a bore when people on the internet take issue with each other&#039;s conduct, so I&#039;ll keep this short. You were snide. I called you snide. There&#039;s no veiled hostility there – the little there is is out in the open.<br /><br />If you want to know why: Damn nigh everyone seems to feel the need to be a least a little bit unpleasant when criticising someone else&#039;s work. Because they think it&#039;s witty or it constitutes honesty or some other dumb reason. And I&#039;m frigging tired of it. You were doing pretty well at being forthright without being uncivil until that last bit of sarcasm. To be honest, it came as a bit of a disappointment, so I decided to call you out on it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 165

>>130109
>Maybe I'm being too ambitious. Maybe you think I'm failing to communicate this departure by having the first chapter resemble a crummy get-together tale all by itself … but I'm kinda relying on you, as an experienced pre-reader, to see that *obviously* the first chapter won't have the peak of emotional tension.
No, given that you haven't gotten to the main conflict promised in your synopsis, I wouldn't expect this to be the high point of your story. And I see you're not above being snide yourself. If you care to look through the other reviews in this thread, you'll see that I only use stronger language when I see the author making the same mistake over and over again. If that's what it takes to break someone of a bad habit, so be it. In any case, I've already spent 3 hours giving you feedback, and I don't seem to be getting anywhere, so I'll be very brief:

Someone who is just deciding she has feelings for someone else and who has no idea whether her love interest returns those feelings in the least is not going to kiss that person. This is not realistic. It's hopelessly cliched, and having the exact situation occur simultaneously from the other side is doubly so. This may not be your story's main conflict, but that doesn't mean you get to short-change it, particularly when it is the main conflict of this chapter. To use your own language and mood, you got "tired of it" when you took offense to my tone. Well, 9 out of 10 shipping stories we get contain this glib type of get-together, and I'm tired of it. That's a big factor in why they get rejected. You may not like Disney movies, but what they do right, at least the recent ones, is give the relationship substantial investment so that the viewer knows the full weight of what the characters have put into it. That realization creates a stake that the viewer has in it as well. You can't just cram two characters together and expect the reader to invent the impetus behind their relationship for you.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130109" onclick="return highlight('130109', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130109">&gt;&gt;130109</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maybe I&#039;m being too ambitious. Maybe you think I&#039;m failing to communicate this departure by having the first chapter resemble a crummy get-together tale all by itself … but I&#039;m kinda relying on you, as an experienced pre-reader, to see that *obviously* the first chapter won&#039;t have the peak of emotional tension.</span><br />No, given that you haven&#039;t gotten to the main conflict promised in your synopsis, I wouldn&#039;t expect this to be the high point of your story. And I see you&#039;re not above being snide yourself. If you care to look through the other reviews in this thread, you&#039;ll see that I only use stronger language when I see the author making the same mistake over and over again. If that&#039;s what it takes to break someone of a bad habit, so be it. In any case, I&#039;ve already spent 3 hours giving you feedback, and I don&#039;t seem to be getting anywhere, so I&#039;ll be very brief:<br /><br />Someone who is just deciding she has feelings for someone else and who has no idea whether her love interest returns those feelings in the least is not going to kiss that person. This is not realistic. It&#039;s hopelessly cliched, and having the exact situation occur simultaneously from the other side is doubly so. This may not be your story&#039;s main conflict, but that doesn&#039;t mean you get to short-change it, particularly when it <i>is</i> the main conflict of this chapter. To use your own language and mood, you got &quot;tired of it&quot; when you took offense to my tone. Well, 9 out of 10 shipping stories we get contain this glib type of get-together, and I&#039;m tired of it. That&#039;s a big factor in why they get rejected. You may not like Disney movies, but what they do right, at least the recent ones, is give the relationship substantial investment so that the viewer knows the full weight of what the characters have put into it. That realization creates a stake that the viewer has in it as well. You can&#039;t just cram two characters together and expect the reader to invent the impetus behind their relationship for you.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 166

>>130105
I can certainly appreciate the desire to be vague about some things in a story, and it can be a powerful tool. But the problem here is that you're being vague about whether the story has a point. If Diamond Tiara doesn't gain any new insight on her cutie mark and she goes back to being the same bully she always was, then none of the characters in the story have changed, and the conflict gets undermined because it's had no effect on anyone. Without character growth or conflict resolution, you don't have a story. There are still ways you can keep things vague. For instance, if DT makes an earnest apology to the children in her dream, but Luna goes on to wonder whether DT will act on it when she wakes up or just dismiss it as fantasy, then we see clear potential and intent for change, since it does happen in the dream, but don't know whether it actually occurs once she wakes up. That's probably not the best way to handle it, but if you think you can do something to address this, I'd be happy to work with you on it.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130105" onclick="return highlight('130105', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130105">&gt;&gt;130105</a><br />I can certainly appreciate the desire to be vague about some things in a story, and it can be a powerful tool. But the problem here is that you&#039;re being vague about whether the story has a point. If Diamond Tiara doesn&#039;t gain any new insight on her cutie mark and she goes back to being the same bully she always was, then none of the characters in the story have changed, and the conflict gets undermined because it&#039;s had no effect on anyone. Without character growth or conflict resolution, you don&#039;t have a story. There are still ways you can keep things vague. For instance, if DT makes an earnest apology to the children in her dream, but Luna goes on to wonder whether DT will act on it when she wakes up or just dismiss it as fantasy, then we see clear potential and intent for change, since it does happen in the dream, but don&#039;t know whether it actually occurs once she wakes up. That&#039;s probably not the best way to handle it, but if you think you can do something to address this, I&#039;d be happy to work with you on it.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 167

>>130111
In my original revision the potential was already there in my view. The fic is not meant to say "here's a story of why DT is so mean and how she gets over it", that's not the story I wanted to tell. I wrote the story in the mindset that DT bullies other ponies to marginalize them and make herself feel better, but coming right out and saying it is boring. I left it out so readers could read between the lines, and so I could focus on what I wanted to write about.

It's a story exploring her cutie mark, its potential meanings, and how she feels about it. That's the entire point of the symbolism of her featureless appearance in the dream, she feels she has no identity because she places such high value on cutie marks and her own is unimpressive - hence Luna seeing her cutie mark as just a black dot. The story doesn't explore the reason for her bullying in a direct manner, it explores her own psyche and view on herself, and I wanted readers to draw their own conclusions about how this is reflected in or by her bullying other ponies.

Your suggested revisions entirely change the focus of the story from what I intend.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130111" onclick="return highlight('130111', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130111">&gt;&gt;130111</a><br />In my original revision the potential was already there in my view. The fic is not meant to say &quot;here&#039;s a story of why DT is so mean and how she gets over it&quot;, that&#039;s not the story I wanted to tell. I wrote the story in the mindset that DT bullies other ponies to marginalize them and make herself feel better, but coming right out and saying it is boring. I left it out so readers could read between the lines, and so I could focus on what I wanted to write about.<br /><br />It&#039;s a story exploring her cutie mark, its potential meanings, and how she feels about it. That&#039;s the entire point of the symbolism of her featureless appearance in the dream, she feels she has no identity because she places such high value on cutie marks and her own is unimpressive - hence Luna seeing her cutie mark as just a black dot. The story doesn&#039;t explore the reason for her bullying in a direct manner, it explores her own psyche and view on herself, and I wanted readers to draw their own conclusions about how this is reflected in or by her bullying other ponies.<br /><br />Your suggested revisions entirely change the focus of the story from what I intend.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Apr 5th, 2014 20:02</span></div><br/>

Reply Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 168

>>130100
Thanks for your help, 63.546. I'll get to work on those immediately. I'm assuming that my story could feasibly be posted to EQD if I fix my errors/inconsistencies, due to the fact that you critiqued it this deeply. I have a question. If I do fix all these errors (and assuming I don't create any more in the process), will the story be approved?

Another question: I don't plan on actually /adding/ to the story. I /do/ plan on rewriting the entire middle scene, a huge portion of the last scene, and most of the epilogue, though. I'll also be introducing a bit more conflict. So, given your comments about the real business being after the first date, will not adding anything after the first date automatically disqualify me?

Thanks,
Unimpressive Vagaries<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130100" onclick="return highlight('130100', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130100">&gt;&gt;130100</a><br />Thanks for your help, 63.546. I&#039;ll get to work on those immediately. I&#039;m assuming that my story could feasibly be posted to EQD if I fix my errors/inconsistencies, due to the fact that you critiqued it this deeply. I have a question. If I do fix all these errors (and assuming I don&#039;t create any more in the process), will the story be approved? <br /><br />Another question: I don&#039;t plan on actually /adding/ to the story. I /do/ plan on rewriting the entire middle scene, a huge portion of the last scene, and most of the epilogue, though. I&#039;ll also be introducing a bit more conflict. So, given your comments about the real business being after the first date, will not adding anything after the first date automatically disqualify me?<br /><br />Thanks, <br />Unimpressive Vagaries<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 169

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Only a short way in, and I'm already seeing a few tics you could do without. I'll take them in order:

You have four "to be" verbs in your opening paragraph. These aren't horrible words, and it's not unusual by the luck of the draw that a paragraph here and there might have as many. but in general, they're boring verbs, since they tell me what is, not what happens. You don't want boring verbs in your opening paragraph especially, but it's a good idea to minimize them throughout the story.

Take this sentence:
"Rarity sighed as she walked along in her fabulous dress, thinking back on the day's earlier events with both regret and embarrassment."
Participles like to modify the nearest prior object when you use them this way. So you're saying that the dress was thinking on the day's earlier events. I can certainly apply a bit of logic and sort it out, but if instead of the dress, you'd had a character in the sentence there, it would be ambiguous whom the participle described. So be careful with those. You've also got some telly language here. I have a section explaining that at the top of this thread. Basically, unless it's really unimportant to the story, it's better for you to get me to figure out that she's embarrassed and regretful through her appearance and actions instead of telling me outright.

And a little later:
"Such thoughts were quickly banished"
Passive voice has its place, but it's yet another way of sapping the action from your verbs. For the same reason, near the beginning of the story isn't a good place for it. It can be used for effect to shift the sentence's focus, but there's not a compelling reason to do so here.

Moving on…

>Trenderhoof//

He asked her to call him "Trend" the first time. Why would she revert to this?

>uncomfortable only for the silently pining mare//

Your perspective has been with Rarity so far, but how would she know it wasn't uncomfortable for him? You have to keep in mind what your perspective is so you don't say something the character couldn't know.

>erstwhile, unintentional//

These are closer to hierarchical than coordinate adjectives. You don't need the comma.

>I'm sure Big Mac'll have some set aside for us." Applejack replied with a chuckle//

Dialogue punctuation.

>She allowed her posture to relax//

>savouring each and every drop as only an Apple knows how. She glanced around to see that few ponies now remained due to the increasing lateness of the hour, which would make it easier to talk, thankfully.//
See how these statements are necessarily from different viewpoints? And thy're in consecutive paragraphs, with no transition between the two. You can switch perspective, but you have to do it smoothly, and you have to consider whether it's even necessary to do so. Is this information vital? Could Applejack's sentiment be rephrased so it shows how Rarity reads it from her behavior? Or vice versa? There's a section on head hopping at the top of this thread that explains.

>down-//

Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen.

>y'all//

As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it's quite rare to see this word used as a singular term.

>it's you, Rarity//

This is the second time in the paragraph Applejack uses her name for direct address. People just don't do this very often in real conversation. It makes their dialogue feel a little artificial.

>"I'm a few things, Rarity, but unless you're involved then "fabulous" ain't normally one of them."//

If you have a quote nested inside another one, use single quotation marks for the inner one.

>"I did wonder," Rarity nodded//

How do you nod a sentence?

>How about you come and sleep in the other guest bedroom tonight, it's quite a walk in the dark back to the Boutique.//

Comma splice.

>Aunt Orange is bound to have something you can use, she always packs spares of that sort of thing.//

And again.

>little snippets and half-conversations that didn’t really adding up to anything of merit//

Typo.

>after all,” at which she winked at Rarity, who blushed at the compliment, “but anything//

There's no speaking verb in your attribution. It looks like you're trying to put a narrative aside in a quote. If so, here's how to do it:
after all—” she winked at Rarity, who blushed at the compliment “—but anything
if the speech stops for the action or:
after all”—she winked at Rarity, who blushed at the compliment—“but anything
if it doesn't. As you seem to employ British usage, you could hav spaced en dashes in place of the unspaced em dashes.

>‘Course//

Three problems here (on only one word, no less!). The apostrophe is backward. Smart quotes are bad at this, and you often have to put two single quotes in a row and delete the first to get a proper leading apostrophe. However, this word doesn't need one. You're eliminating an entire word, not some letters. Thirdly, you have mixed quotation mark styles in your story. You had the simple type early on, but the fancy type here. That leading apostrophe thing only pops up for the fancy quotes, so if that's what you decide to use throughout, you'll have to go back and fix those. But make your quotation mark style consistent.

>that most unfathomable of desires: a best friend’s older brother//

How is this unfathomable? I'd say it's fairly common.

>(and her mind, as best she could)//

Parentheses really work best for first-person narration or very subjective third-person.

>She nodded, happy with her summation, before glancing at the clock and laughing slightly.//

Indentation is off here.

>believe!//

Normally, you'll italicize ! or ? when they're on an italicized word or letter.

>Rarity had been so sure she would be able to win over his affections, too!//

She didn't get the message last time?

>laidback//

laid-back

You have a pretty good sense of who Rarity and Applejack are, so it comes through in their dialogue. That's not a minor thing to get right.

You had a few comma splices and questionable speech attributions, and a few spots of nested quotes. Some telly language here and there… really, the most pervasive things were the flighty perspective and the overload of "to be" verbs. Of the easiest forms to search on, I found 91, which is a rate of about 2 every 5 sentences.

Lastly, while this makes for a nice scene, it doesn't have the character growth or conflict of a story. The only slight conflict is this discussion about what kinds of stallions Applejack and Rarity like, but all that really happens is that Rarity decides her standards may be worth keeping. It doesn't take a struggle for her to get there, either, and it's the exact attitude she had at the beginning of the story. So there was never anything at stake, nothing that could have turned out badly, and no change in any of the characters. It really takes one or more of these to put some impetus behind what happens and make me come away from the story with a message.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Only a short way in, and I&#039;m already seeing a few tics you could do without. I&#039;ll take them in order:<br /><br />You have four &quot;to be&quot; verbs in your opening paragraph. These aren&#039;t horrible words, and it&#039;s not unusual by the luck of the draw that a paragraph here and there might have as many. but in general, they&#039;re boring verbs, since they tell me what is, not what happens. You don&#039;t want boring verbs in your opening paragraph especially, but it&#039;s a good idea to minimize them throughout the story.<br /><br />Take this sentence:<br />&quot;Rarity sighed as she walked along in her fabulous dress, thinking back on the day&#039;s earlier events with both regret and embarrassment.&quot;<br />Participles like to modify the nearest prior object when you use them this way. So you&#039;re saying that the dress was thinking on the day&#039;s earlier events. I can certainly apply a bit of logic and sort it out, but if instead of the dress, you&#039;d had a character in the sentence there, it would be ambiguous whom the participle described. So be careful with those. You&#039;ve also got some telly language here. I have a section explaining that at the top of this thread. Basically, unless it&#039;s really unimportant to the story, it&#039;s better for you to get me to figure out that she&#039;s embarrassed and regretful through her appearance and actions instead of telling me outright.<br /><br />And a little later:<br />&quot;Such thoughts were quickly banished&quot;<br />Passive voice has its place, but it&#039;s yet another way of sapping the action from your verbs. For the same reason, near the beginning of the story isn&#039;t a good place for it. It can be used for effect to shift the sentence&#039;s focus, but there&#039;s not a compelling reason to do so here.<br /><br />Moving on…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Trenderhoof//</span><br />He asked her to call him &quot;Trend&quot; the first time. Why would she revert to this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;uncomfortable only for the silently pining mare//</span><br />Your perspective has been with Rarity so far, but how would she know it wasn&#039;t uncomfortable for him? You have to keep in mind what your perspective is so you don&#039;t say something the character couldn&#039;t know.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;erstwhile, unintentional//</span><br />These are closer to hierarchical than coordinate adjectives. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m sure Big Mac&#039;ll have some set aside for us.&quot; Applejack replied with a chuckle//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She allowed her posture to relax//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;savouring each and every drop as only an Apple knows how. She glanced around to see that few ponies now remained due to the increasing lateness of the hour, which would make it easier to talk, thankfully.//</span><br />See how these statements are necessarily from different viewpoints? And thy&#039;re in consecutive paragraphs, with no transition between the two. You can switch perspective, but you have to do it smoothly, and you have to consider whether it&#039;s even necessary to do so. Is this information vital? Could Applejack&#039;s sentiment be rephrased so it shows how Rarity reads it from her behavior? Or vice versa? There&#039;s a section on head hopping at the top of this thread that explains.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;down-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;y&#039;all//</span><br />As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it&#039;s quite rare to see this word used as a singular term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it&#039;s you, Rarity//</span><br />This is the second time in the paragraph Applejack uses her name for direct address. People just don&#039;t do this very often in real conversation. It makes their dialogue feel a little artificial.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I&#039;m a few things, Rarity, but unless you&#039;re involved then &quot;fabulous&quot; ain&#039;t normally one of them.&quot;//</span><br />If you have a quote nested inside another one, use single quotation marks for the inner one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I did wonder,&quot; Rarity nodded//</span><br />How do you nod a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How about you come and sleep in the other guest bedroom tonight, it&#039;s quite a walk in the dark back to the Boutique.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Aunt Orange is bound to have something you can use, she always packs spares of that sort of thing.//</span><br />And again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little snippets and half-conversations that didn’t really adding up to anything of merit//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after all,” at which she winked at Rarity, who blushed at the compliment, “but anything//</span><br />There&#039;s no speaking verb in your attribution. It looks like you&#039;re trying to put a narrative aside in a quote. If so, here&#039;s how to do it:<br />after all—” she winked at Rarity, who blushed at the compliment “—but anything<br />if the speech stops for the action or:<br />after all”—she winked at Rarity, who blushed at the compliment—“but anything<br />if it doesn&#039;t. As you seem to employ British usage, you could hav spaced en dashes in place of the unspaced em dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Course//</span><br />Three problems here (on only one word, no less!). The apostrophe is backward. Smart quotes are bad at this, and you often have to put two single quotes in a row and delete the first to get a proper leading apostrophe. However, this word doesn&#039;t need one. You&#039;re eliminating an entire word, not some letters. Thirdly, you have mixed quotation mark styles in your story. You had the simple type early on, but the fancy type here. That leading apostrophe thing only pops up for the fancy quotes, so if that&#039;s what you decide to use throughout, you&#039;ll have to go back and fix those. But make your quotation mark style consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that most unfathomable of desires: a best friend’s older brother//</span><br />How is this unfathomable? I&#039;d say it&#039;s fairly common.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(and her mind, as best she could)//</span><br />Parentheses really work best for first-person narration or very subjective third-person.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She nodded, happy with her summation, before glancing at the clock and laughing slightly.//</span><br />Indentation is off here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>believe</i>!//</span><br />Normally, you&#039;ll italicize ! or ? when they&#039;re on an italicized word or letter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity had been so sure she would be able to win over his affections, too!//</span><br />She didn&#039;t get the message last time?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laidback//</span><br />laid-back<br /><br />You have a pretty good sense of who Rarity and Applejack are, so it comes through in their dialogue. That&#039;s not a minor thing to get right.<br /><br />You had a few comma splices and questionable speech attributions, and a few spots of nested quotes. Some telly language here and there… really, the most pervasive things were the flighty perspective and the overload of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Of the easiest forms to search on, I found 91, which is a rate of about 2 every 5 sentences.<br /><br />Lastly, while this makes for a nice scene, it doesn&#039;t have the character growth or conflict of a story. The only slight conflict is this discussion about what kinds of stallions Applejack and Rarity like, but all that really happens is that Rarity decides her standards may be worth keeping. It doesn&#039;t take a struggle for her to get there, either, and it&#039;s the exact attitude she had at the beginning of the story. So there was never anything at stake, nothing that could have turned out badly, and no change in any of the characters. It really takes one or more of these to put some impetus behind what happens and make me come away from the story with a message.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 170

>>130112
It's certainly your prerogative to decide what you want to do with your story, but I hope you can see where I'm coming from. You set up a conflict, then drop it. It's like if Frozen had ended right when the sisters finally met, leaving it up to you to decide what the outcome was. It'd be unsatisfying, and a bad use of my time just to leave things as they were when I started.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130112" onclick="return highlight('130112', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130112">&gt;&gt;130112</a><br />It&#039;s certainly your prerogative to decide what you want to do with your story, but I hope you can see where I&#039;m coming from. You set up a conflict, then drop it. It&#039;s like if <i>Frozen</i> had ended right when the sisters finally met, leaving it up to you to decide what the outcome was. It&#039;d be unsatisfying, and a bad use of my time just to leave things as they were when I started.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 171

>>130119
What you've described could certainly improve things, but as with any story, the proof is in the execution. I can't guarantee anything beforehand, and I might not even be the pre-reader who takes it on the next go-around.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130119" onclick="return highlight('130119', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130119">&gt;&gt;130119</a><br />What you&#039;ve described could certainly improve things, but as with any story, the proof is in the execution. I can&#039;t guarantee anything beforehand, and I might not even be the pre-reader who takes it on the next go-around.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 172

>>130122
I see where you're coming from, and I am not adverse to revising the story further. But not the way you're asking, if you have any other suggestions I'm open to them.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130122" onclick="return highlight('130122', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130122">&gt;&gt;130122</a><br />I see where you&#039;re coming from, and I am not adverse to revising the story further. But not the way you&#039;re asking, if you have any other suggestions I&#039;m open to them.<br />

Jet CannonCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 173

>>130121
Thank you for your review, you've certainly raised several good points. I didn't realise that most of the formatting/punctuation things you mentioned were even there! Quirks of Microsoft Word's interaction with other programs and word processors, I suppose.
From what you've said, if I understand correctly, even with your suggested changes my story would still be unlikely to "make the cut", as it were? Ah well, I can live with that as you've explained it well.
Thank you anyway.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130121" onclick="return highlight('130121', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130121">&gt;&gt;130121</a><br />Thank you for your review, you&#039;ve certainly raised several good points. I didn&#039;t realise that most of the formatting/punctuation things you mentioned were even there! Quirks of Microsoft Word&#039;s interaction with other programs and word processors, I suppose.<br />From what you&#039;ve said, if I understand correctly, even with your suggested changes my story would still be unlikely to &quot;make the cut&quot;, as it were? Ah well, I can live with that as you&#039;ve explained it well.<br />Thank you anyway.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 174

>>130127
I can't say unequivocally whether it would or would not make the cut, because it really depends on what you change and how. The big thing this needs is some real conflict. I'm not necessarily recommending this, because it's pretty cliched, but say Applejack teases out of Rarity that she has such high standards as a rationalization for keeping herself from ever finding someone to date, because deep down she feels she's not worth it. Then Rarity convinces her she is. That's a very pat thing, though certainly workable if written well. But that's what it takes. Have a character that stands to gain or lose something, or who changes in some concrete way.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130127" onclick="return highlight('130127', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130127">&gt;&gt;130127</a><br />I can&#039;t say unequivocally whether it would or would not make the cut, because it really depends on what you change and how. The big thing this needs is some real conflict. I&#039;m not necessarily recommending this, because it&#039;s pretty cliched, but say Applejack teases out of Rarity that she has such high standards as a rationalization for keeping herself from ever finding someone to date, because deep down she feels she&#039;s not worth it. Then Rarity convinces her she is. That&#039;s a very pat thing, though certainly workable if written well. But that&#039;s what it takes. Have a character that stands to gain or lose something, or who changes in some concrete way.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 175

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She couldn’t remember how long she’d been walking//

Minor thing, but I usually recommend trying to stay away from "to be" verbs in the first couple of paragraphs in order to strike an active tone immediately. It's more interesting. Now, this is the only one you have up here in the early going, so it's not a disaster, but it's also one that would be easy to remove. I'd also encourage you to use a more descriptive verb than "walk" here, maybe "trudge" or "plod."

>The viscid earth//

Two issues here. First, in the fluid mechanics world, we do use "inviscid," but we never use this word, always "viscous." YMMV depending on how you might have encountered it before, but that leads to my other point: Your narrator is shadowing Scootaloo, so it's a good idea to keep to language that she might be expected to use herself, even if you don't take on her voice explicitly. And I don't believe she'd know this word.

>pop//

Lose the italics. It's a valid word as is, and you don't need sound effects in the narration, anyway.

>Panting//

You're starting this sentence with a participle when you just ended the previous sentence with one. It creates a repetitive feel.

>exhaustion dulled her fear//

You're in a gray area here, but I think it'd be a little more effective to show me symptoms of her exhaustion rather than just mentioning it as a fact.

>Growling softly, she hauled another hoof up from the slimy muck, wrinkling her nose as it came free.//

Two more participles, and in a single sentence. Many inexperienced writers overuse these, so keep an eye out. You don't want to appear to be one of them. They also synchronize actions, so you have all three of these happening at once. For that matter, the "as" clause does the same thing, so you have four concurrent actions, where it doesn't appear you actually intended that.

>My hooves were all muddy and I couldn’t run right.//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>other, less identifiable, shapes//

You don't need these commas.

>Scootaloo's heart leapt into her throat. “Aaah!”//

Here's a spot where synchronization is actually called for. These would reasonably happen at the same time.

>princess’//

This has become acceptable due to common usage, but the traditional usage would be "princess's." The strongest argument I can make for it is that people who use this common form are inconsistent about it. Would you say "the boss' office" or "the boss's office"? Even people who would write it the first way still speak it the second way.

>Reaching a grime-covered hoof out tentatively//

I'm only one screen into the story, and I've already counted ten participial phrases.

>pointing at the bog as she began to sniffle//

One of my missions in life is to break people of using "start" and "begin" actions when they aren't needed. It's another thing that inexperienced writers do too often. Any given action begins. It's only worth using them when the beginning is abrupt or the action never finishes. Or perhaps when it serves to characterize someone. The extra issue here is that you synchronize the beginning with the pointing, so the pointing ends when the beginning ends, which is… vague and confusing.

>but it always seeks to escape//

>It seeks to reclaim you.//
Repetitive phrasing.

>A smile stretched slowly across Luna's face.//

For a little while now, your perspective has been unclear. You don't have to have one, but it creates a closer connection to the reader when you do, which is a plus in a piece that speaks to emotions like this one. I bring it up here because you seemed to be taking Scootaloo's perspective early in the story. She was your only option, of course, but the narration did seem to dip into her head. But here, the perspective seems to float outside both of them. You haven't really touch ed on Luna's feelings at all, but you're not with Scootaloo anymore—she just closed her eyes, so she can't see this.

>as arcs of glowing magic leapt between the princess’ hooves. The air thrummed with power as the energy coalesced into a ice-blue helmet//

You're using quite a few of these "as" clauses, too.

>Scootaloo gasped, her stomach still somewhere on the ground below. “Wow, you’re even faster than Rainbow Dash!” Laughing, she felt the skin on her face rippling as Luna pumped her wings, propelling them ever-faster into the open sky.//

See, this is very much in Scootaloo's perspective. I'd urge you to put a little phrase here and there throughout the story to color things through Scootaloo's eyes. It'll keep the perspective consistent instead of vaguely wavering between her and an omniscient one. The "ever-faster" doesn't need a hyphen, and it's fairly repetitive with the "even faster."

>Her grin widened//

It's ambiguous whom this describes.

>she threw her hooves out, and relished the silky caress//

You don't need that comma. It's not a new clause, just a second verb for the original subject, and one that's not complex enough to need a comma to keep things organized.

>helix//

Another example of a word choice that's probably too advanced for Scootaloo's perspective.

>but she couldn’t help but notice//

Repetitive phrasing. Try "but she couldn’t help noticing."

>The words were soft; a caress.//

Semicolons are a formal enough structure that it really feels out of place to use them with stylistic fragments.

>each of us suffer//

"Each" is treated as a singular term, so match your verb to that.

>She was more…” Scootaloo twirled her hoof, searching for the word. “… worn down or something.//

Looks like you're trying to put a narrative aside in the quote. Here's how:
She was more—” Scootaloo twirled her hoof, searching for the word “—worn down or something.
if the speech stops for the aside's action and
She was more”—Scootaloo twirled her hoof, searching for the word—“worn down or something.
if it doesn't. I also noticed by chance that the first of these two ellipses is a single character, while the other is three separate dots. You chould do a search and replace of one for the other. It doesn't matter which version you keep.

>She wiped her eyes, throwing her hooves around the princess.//

Here's another example of synchronization gone awry with a participle. She can't do both of these at the same time.

>forever more//

One word.

>She took Scootaloo’s cheeks in her hooves, staring directly into the filly’s eyes.//

This is not a bad instance, but it does illustrate another danger of participles. They like to modify the nearest prior object when they don't begin a clause, so strictly speaking, you're saying that her hooves are staring. I can sort this out with a bit of logic, but if you aren't careful, you will eventually write something that's ambiguous or misleading.

>And at the cliff’s edge, she leapt.//

Well, I'm coming dangerously close to "this is how I would have written it" instead of "this is how it needs to be written," but I would have had Rainbow there with her, if only because she's taking a stupid risk otherwise, and I can't imagine that's the message Luna wanted her to take away from her dream. Dash can be sitting there on the ground, so she's not acting like she'd better baby Scootaloo through it or it won't work. That'd be a powerful statement on Dash's part, I think. What troubles me here is how Scootaloo still thinks about her aunt. Luna's given her a plausible explanation of how the aunt has acted, but she seemed uninvolved or even encouraging Scoot to leave her. I have to think there'd be legal hoops to jump through, but Scootaloo is being very dismissive of someone who may just not know how to show her love. And it also places quite an onus on Dash to have Scoot suddenly say she needs to take full responsibility for her, with Luna's blessing, no less.

Other than that, my only issues are mechanical, but they're pervasive enough that I do want you to make an earnest sweep for them. And yes, I do want to see this posted. The main things are the overload on participles, "as" clauses, and "to be" verbs. It's too ungainly to count participles, but suffice it to say they're everywhere. You have 48 instances of "as." While they're probably not all used in that sense, the majority are, and it did stand out to me as a repetitive structure. And of the easier forms to search on, I counted 138 "to be" verbs, which is a rate of about once every three sentences. Not awful, but could use a little cleaning up.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She couldn’t remember how long she’d been walking//</span><br />Minor thing, but I usually recommend trying to stay away from &quot;to be&quot; verbs in the first couple of paragraphs in order to strike an active tone immediately. It&#039;s more interesting. Now, this is the only one you have up here in the early going, so it&#039;s not a disaster, but it&#039;s also one that would be easy to remove. I&#039;d also encourage you to use a more descriptive verb than &quot;walk&quot; here, maybe &quot;trudge&quot; or &quot;plod.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The viscid earth//</span><br />Two issues here. First, in the fluid mechanics world, we do use &quot;inviscid,&quot; but we never use this word, always &quot;viscous.&quot; YMMV depending on how you might have encountered it before, but that leads to my other point: Your narrator is shadowing Scootaloo, so it&#039;s a good idea to keep to language that she might be expected to use herself, even if you don&#039;t take on her voice explicitly. And I don&#039;t believe she&#039;d know this word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>pop</i>//</span><br />Lose the italics. It&#039;s a valid word as is, and you don&#039;t need sound effects in the narration, anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Panting//</span><br />You&#039;re starting this sentence with a participle when you just ended the previous sentence with one. It creates a repetitive feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;exhaustion dulled her fear//</span><br />You&#039;re in a gray area here, but I think it&#039;d be a little more effective to show me symptoms of her exhaustion rather than just mentioning it as a fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Growling softly, she hauled another hoof up from the slimy muck, wrinkling her nose as it came free.//</span><br />Two more participles, and in a single sentence. Many inexperienced writers overuse these, so keep an eye out. You don&#039;t want to appear to be one of them. They also synchronize actions, so you have all three of these happening at once. For that matter, the &quot;as&quot; clause does the same thing, so you have four concurrent actions, where it doesn&#039;t appear you actually intended that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>My hooves were all muddy and I couldn’t run right.</i>//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;other, less identifiable, shapes//</span><br />You don&#039;t need these commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo&#039;s heart leapt into her throat. “Aaah!”//</span><br />Here&#039;s a spot where synchronization is actually called for. These would reasonably happen at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princess’//</span><br />This has become acceptable due to common usage, but the traditional usage would be &quot;princess&#039;s.&quot; The strongest argument I can make for it is that people who use this common form are inconsistent about it. Would you say &quot;the boss&#039; office&quot; or &quot;the boss&#039;s office&quot;? Even people who would write it the first way still speak it the second way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Reaching a grime-covered hoof out tentatively//</span><br />I&#039;m only one screen into the story, and I&#039;ve already counted ten participial phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pointing at the bog as she began to sniffle//</span><br />One of my missions in life is to break people of using &quot;start&quot; and &quot;begin&quot; actions when they aren&#039;t needed. It&#039;s another thing that inexperienced writers do too often. Any given action begins. It&#039;s only worth using them when the beginning is abrupt or the action never finishes. Or perhaps when it serves to characterize someone. The extra issue here is that you synchronize the beginning with the pointing, so the pointing ends when the beginning ends, which is… vague and confusing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but it always seeks to escape//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It seeks to reclaim you.//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A smile stretched slowly across Luna&#039;s face.//</span><br />For a little while now, your perspective has been unclear. You don&#039;t have to have one, but it creates a closer connection to the reader when you do, which is a plus in a piece that speaks to emotions like this one. I bring it up here because you seemed to be taking Scootaloo&#039;s perspective early in the story. She was your only option, of course, but the narration did seem to dip into her head. But here, the perspective seems to float outside both of them. You haven&#039;t really touch ed on Luna&#039;s feelings at all, but you&#039;re not with Scootaloo anymore—she just closed her eyes, so she can&#039;t see this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as arcs of glowing magic leapt between the princess’ hooves. The air thrummed with power as the energy coalesced into a ice-blue helmet//</span><br />You&#039;re using quite a few of these &quot;as&quot; clauses, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo gasped, her stomach still somewhere on the ground below. “Wow, you’re even faster than Rainbow Dash!” Laughing, she felt the skin on her face rippling as Luna pumped her wings, propelling them ever-faster into the open sky.//</span><br />See, this is very much in Scootaloo&#039;s perspective. I&#039;d urge you to put a little phrase here and there throughout the story to color things through Scootaloo&#039;s eyes. It&#039;ll keep the perspective consistent instead of vaguely wavering between her and an omniscient one. The &quot;ever-faster&quot; doesn&#039;t need a hyphen, and it&#039;s fairly repetitive with the &quot;even faster.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her grin widened//</span><br />It&#039;s ambiguous whom this describes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she threw her hooves out, and relished the silky caress//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that comma. It&#039;s not a new clause, just a second verb for the original subject, and one that&#039;s not complex enough to need a comma to keep things organized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;helix//</span><br />Another example of a word choice that&#039;s probably too advanced for Scootaloo&#039;s perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but she couldn’t help but notice//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing. Try &quot;but she couldn’t help noticing.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The words were soft; a caress.//</span><br />Semicolons are a formal enough structure that it really feels out of place to use them with stylistic fragments.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;each of us suffer//</span><br />&quot;Each&quot; is treated as a singular term, so match your verb to that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was more…” Scootaloo twirled her hoof, searching for the word. “… worn down or something.//</span><br />Looks like you&#039;re trying to put a narrative aside in the quote. Here&#039;s how:<br />She was more—” Scootaloo twirled her hoof, searching for the word “—worn down or something.<br />if the speech stops for the aside&#039;s action and<br />She was more”—Scootaloo twirled her hoof, searching for the word—“worn down or something.<br />if it doesn&#039;t. I also noticed by chance that the first of these two ellipses is a single character, while the other is three separate dots. You chould do a search and replace of one for the other. It doesn&#039;t matter which version you keep.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wiped her eyes, throwing her hooves around the princess.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another example of synchronization gone awry with a participle. She can&#039;t do both of these at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;forever more//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She took Scootaloo’s cheeks in her hooves, staring directly into the filly’s eyes.//</span><br />This is not a bad instance, but it does illustrate another danger of participles. They like to modify the nearest prior object when they don&#039;t begin a clause, so strictly speaking, you&#039;re saying that her hooves are staring. I can sort this out with a bit of logic, but if you aren&#039;t careful, you will eventually write something that&#039;s ambiguous or misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And at the cliff’s edge, she leapt.//</span><br />Well, I&#039;m coming dangerously close to &quot;this is how I would have written it&quot; instead of &quot;this is how it needs to be written,&quot; but I would have had Rainbow there with her, if only because she&#039;s taking a stupid risk otherwise, and I can&#039;t imagine that&#039;s the message Luna wanted her to take away from her dream. Dash can be sitting there on the ground, so she&#039;s not acting like she&#039;d better baby Scootaloo through it or it won&#039;t work. That&#039;d be a powerful statement on Dash&#039;s part, I think. What troubles me here is how Scootaloo still thinks about her aunt. Luna&#039;s given her a plausible explanation of how the aunt has acted, but she seemed uninvolved or even encouraging Scoot to leave her. I have to think there&#039;d be legal hoops to jump through, but Scootaloo is being very dismissive of someone who may just not know how to show her love. And it also places quite an onus on Dash to have Scoot suddenly say she needs to take full responsibility for her, with Luna&#039;s blessing, no less.<br /><br />Other than that, my only issues are mechanical, but they&#039;re pervasive enough that I do want you to make an earnest sweep for them. And yes, I do want to see this posted. The main things are the overload on participles, &quot;as&quot; clauses, and &quot;to be&quot; verbs. It&#039;s too ungainly to count participles, but suffice it to say they&#039;re everywhere. You have 48 instances of &quot;as.&quot; While they&#039;re probably not all used in that sense, the majority are, and it did stand out to me as a repetitive structure. And of the easier forms to search on, I counted 138 &quot;to be&quot; verbs, which is a rate of about once every three sentences. Not awful, but could use a little cleaning up.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Apr 8th, 2014 21:32</span></div><br/>

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 176

I'm not above being snide, no. And it's perfectly reasonable for you to call me out if you think I was being unfair.

>Someone who is just deciding she has feelings for someone else and who has no idea whether her love interest returns those feelings in the least is not going to kiss that person. This is not realistic.


First, I want to note that that "The kiss was unrealistic" is a different problem than "The characters aren't acting like they're in love", even if they're related. I thought the latter was your main problem, which is why I went after it in my last post. (Though in fairness, you said both, so it was an oversight on my part).

In any case, this problem is misguided too. Let's grant for the sake or argument that it's unrealistic to have one character kiss another if they're uncertain of how the other feels. Does this affect the story? Nope. Pinkie is uncertain. And she *doesn't* kiss first. Rarity does. (I hope it's obvious that Rarity very much is aware of how Pinkie feels by this point.) High-risk kissing might be a problem you see a lot, but it's not relevant in the slightest to this story.

(There's other stuff I could chase after, but I'll leave it for the moment because most of it looks tangential and I agree that brevity is the best policy.)I&#039;m not above being snide, no. And it&#039;s perfectly reasonable for you to call me out if you think I was being unfair.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Someone who is just deciding she has feelings for someone else and who has no idea whether her love interest returns those feelings in the least is not going to kiss that person. This is not realistic.</span><br /><br />First, I want to note that that &quot;The kiss was unrealistic&quot; is a different problem than &quot;The characters aren&#039;t acting like they&#039;re in love&quot;, even if they&#039;re related. I thought the latter was your main problem, which is why I went after it in my last post. (Though in fairness, you said both, so it was an oversight on my part).<br /><br />In any case, this problem is misguided too. Let&#039;s grant for the sake or argument that it&#039;s unrealistic to have one character kiss another if they&#039;re uncertain of how the other feels. Does this affect the story? Nope. Pinkie is uncertain. And she *doesn&#039;t* kiss first. Rarity does. (I hope it&#039;s obvious that Rarity very much is aware of how Pinkie feels by this point.) High-risk kissing might be a problem you see a lot, but it&#039;s not relevant in the slightest to this story.<br /><br />(There&#039;s other stuff I could chase after, but I&#039;ll leave it for the moment because most of it looks tangential and I agree that brevity is the best policy.)<br />

Pre-reader 63.546"s EQD Feedback Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 177

>>130130
Thank you for all of this. I'll see about getting with an editor and parsing through it.

My only really comment on it is the advice at the end. You're calling for Rainbow to be there with Scootaloo because of the risk that she's taking, but she's not really risking anything. She's over the water, close enough to see the bugs that the fish are eating. So, maybe ten to fifteen feet up. She's not in any danger. I've had several readers comment about that, as they were confused as well, so there is room for improvement, but I think bringing other ponies in is a little drastic.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130130" onclick="return highlight('130130', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130130">&gt;&gt;130130</a><br />Thank you for all of this. I&#039;ll see about getting with an editor and parsing through it. <br /><br />My only really comment on it is the advice at the end. You&#039;re calling for Rainbow to be there with Scootaloo because of the risk that she&#039;s taking, but she&#039;s not really risking anything. She&#039;s over the water, close enough to see the bugs that the fish are eating. So, maybe ten to fifteen feet up. She&#039;s not in any danger. I&#039;ve had several readers comment about that, as they were confused as well, so there is room for improvement, but I think bringing other ponies in is a little drastic.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 178

>>130146
Fair enough. All I noted was mention of a cliff, so I had something rather high envisioned. If I'm not the only one to point that out, it could probably stand some clarification, but that would be a reasonable thing for her to do if it's not a dangerous drop-off.

The only other thing I'd caution you about with regard to Scootaloo's aunt is that you don't want to add needless tragedy to an already sad story. We refer to that as "piling on." So not only is Scoot angsty about flying, but she's also a neglected child. It's certainly reasonable that Scoot would react to her that way, as children make such knee-jerk leaps, but having everything go wrong that possibly can makes it look like you're taking an obvious grab for the reader's heartstrings, where doing the opposite may carry even more subtle power. Plus if Luna really thinks Scootaloo was mistreated, I don't know that she'd forgo taking action in real life against the aunt.

Just food for thought. You do a good job of thinking things through, so I trust you can come up with something suitable.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130146" onclick="return highlight('130146', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130146">&gt;&gt;130146</a><br />Fair enough. All I noted was mention of a cliff, so I had something rather high envisioned. If I&#039;m not the only one to point that out, it could probably stand some clarification, but that would be a reasonable thing for her to do if it&#039;s not a dangerous drop-off.<br /><br />The only other thing I&#039;d caution you about with regard to Scootaloo&#039;s aunt is that you don&#039;t want to add needless tragedy to an already sad story. We refer to that as &quot;piling on.&quot; So not only is Scoot angsty about flying, but she&#039;s also a neglected child. It&#039;s certainly reasonable that Scoot would react to her that way, as children make such knee-jerk leaps, but having everything go wrong that possibly can makes it look like you&#039;re taking an obvious grab for the reader&#039;s heartstrings, where doing the opposite may carry even more subtle power. Plus if Luna really thinks Scootaloo was mistreated, I don&#039;t know that she&#039;d forgo taking action in real life against the aunt.<br /><br />Just food for thought. You do a good job of thinking things through, so I trust you can come up with something suitable.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Wed, Apr 9th, 2014 18:25</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 179

>>130139
>Let's grant for the sake or argument that it's unrealistic to have one character kiss another if they're uncertain of how the other feels. Does this affect the story? Nope.//
I'd say it unequivocally does affect the story. Few things break reader immersion more quickly than a character behaving in an unrealistic manner, even if it's a minor one who only appears in a single paragraph. That's just twisting the character for plot convenience instead of putting thought into how the character would naturally react to the situation.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130139" onclick="return highlight('130139', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130139">&gt;&gt;130139</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Let&#039;s grant for the sake or argument that it&#039;s unrealistic to have one character kiss another if they&#039;re uncertain of how the other feels. Does this affect the story? Nope.//</span><br />I&#039;d say it unequivocally <i>does</i> affect the story. Few things break reader immersion more quickly than a character behaving in an unrealistic manner, even if it&#039;s a minor one who only appears in a single paragraph. That&#039;s just twisting the character for plot convenience instead of putting thought into how the character would naturally react to the situation.<br />

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 180

>I'd say it unequivocally does affect the story.

I know I'm a pain in the arse and all, but could you at least grant me the respect of reading the whole post?

Again: The criticism doesn't affect the story because a kiss like that doesn't occur in the story.<span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;d say it unequivocally does affect the story.</span><br /><br />I know I&#039;m a pain in the arse and all, but could you at least grant me the respect of reading the whole post?<br /><br />Again: The criticism doesn&#039;t affect the story because <i>a kiss like that doesn&#039;t occur in the story.</i><br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 181

>>130154
I'd appreciate it if you read the entire post as well. I'd quoted your hypothetical instance.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130154" onclick="return highlight('130154', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130154">&gt;&gt;130154</a><br />I&#039;d appreciate it if you read the entire post as well. I&#039;d quoted your hypothetical instance.<br />

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 182

>>130155

Now I'm completely lost. Let's try this again. As I understand it, you current criticism is:

It is unrealistic to have Character A kiss Character B if Character A doesn't know if Character B has feelings for them.

Is that a correct summary of your criticism?

IF SO, it doesn't apply. It doesn't apply because in the story there is no situation where A kisses B and A doesn't know how B feels.


IF NOT, what is your criticism? It shouldn't take long to summarise. The last two I (wrongly?) dealt with take up but a single sentence when stripped of rhetoric and advice.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130155" onclick="return highlight('130155', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130155">&gt;&gt;130155</a><br /><br />Now I&#039;m completely lost. Let&#039;s try this again. As I understand it, you current criticism is:<br /><br /><i>It is unrealistic to have Character A kiss Character B if Character A doesn&#039;t know if Character B has feelings for them.</i><br /><br />Is that a correct summary of your criticism?<br /><br />IF SO, it doesn&#039;t apply. It doesn&#039;t apply because in the story there is no situation where A kisses B and A doesn&#039;t know how B feels.<br /><br /><br />IF NOT, what <i>is</i> your criticism? It shouldn&#039;t take long to summarise. The last two I (wrongly?) dealt with take up but a single sentence when stripped of rhetoric and advice.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 183

>>130158
This has long since stopped being productive for either one of us.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130158" onclick="return highlight('130158', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130158">&gt;&gt;130158</a><br />This has long since stopped being productive for either one of us.<br />

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 184

A little defeatist, perhaps?

You said earlier you spent three hours working on responses. Not for my sake, I know, but to get something good on EQD. And most of those were rhetorical flourishes and tangential comments.

How much longer would it take to answer my very simple yes-or-no question? In the worst case scenario, how much longer would it take to assemble a succinct and concrete one-sentence summary? Not long, I'd wager. So if your mandate is that important to you, why not put in the tiniest bit of effort on the chance that those three hours won't be wasted?

And if you're not going to, what does it say that I lucked out on a pre-reader who'll spend three hours putting together obfuscated criticism but, when prompted, is unable or unwilling to give a clear, succinct, and relevant problem?
A little defeatist, perhaps?<br /><br />You said earlier you spent three hours working on responses. Not for my sake, I know, but to get something good on EQD. And most of those were rhetorical flourishes and tangential comments.<br /><br />How much longer would it take to answer my very simple yes-or-no question? In the worst case scenario, how much longer would it take to assemble a succinct and concrete one-sentence summary? Not long, I&#039;d wager. So if your mandate is that important to you, why not put in the tiniest bit of effort on the chance that those three hours won&#039;t be wasted?<br /><br />And if you&#039;re not going to, what does it say that I lucked out on a pre-reader who&#039;ll spend three hours putting together obfuscated criticism but, when prompted, is unable or unwilling to give a clear, succinct, and relevant problem?<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 185

>>130163
Dude, fuck you.

This guy went through the trouble of trying to help you but you keep coming back to what amounts to "ITS JUST THAT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND MY GENIUS."

In behalf of everyone who reads this thread for some insight into making good stories, get out and stop spamming your stupidity. At this point, I'm a 100% sure the prereaders are considering leaving your submissions for last if not outright ignoring you because you are such an ass.

Now, as before, fuck you.

Oh, and for the record, if you haven't noticed he doesn't need to help you for shit, you entitled excuse of a keyboard masher.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130163" onclick="return highlight('130163', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130163">&gt;&gt;130163</a><br />Dude, fuck you.<br /><br />This guy went through the trouble of trying to help you but you keep coming back to what amounts to &quot;ITS JUST THAT YOU DON&#039;T UNDERSTAND MY GENIUS.&quot;<br /><br />In behalf of everyone who reads this thread for some insight into making good stories, get out and stop spamming your stupidity. At this point, I&#039;m a 100% sure the prereaders are considering leaving your submissions for last if not outright ignoring you because you are such an ass.<br /><br />Now, as before, fuck you.<br /><br />Oh, and for the record, if you haven&#039;t noticed he doesn&#039;t need to help you for shit, you entitled excuse of a keyboard masher.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Fri, Apr 11th, 2014 13:53</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 186

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She seeks the comforting help of one of her best friends, and she is more than happy to help.//

The second "she" is ambiguous. I'd recommend "who" in place of "and she." However, this is also the second "to be" verb in your synopsis. I'd also recommend trying to keep those out of a synopsis, unless it's really the only way to avoid an awkward phrasing, since these verbs aren't very good at grabbing anyone's interest.

>Night had fallen over Ponyville as the shimmering moon raised in the sky.//

Your synchronizing two things here that would really happen in sequence. And "raised" takes a direct object. You want "rose."

>Even though night had fallen//

You're not calling attention to this as any sort of thematic repetition, so it just feels like an oversight. Your opening sentence used almost the exact phrasing, and it's just repetitive.

>a dozen or so of her clones//

There were a lot more than that. Just go back and look at the scene where they were all gathered inside.

>listened to the crickets chirping their serene call. Ponyville was truly down for the night as Pinkie Pie was alone in listening to the crickets//

More obtrusive repetition. You also have five "to be" verbs in this paragraph alone, and I'm seeing a lot in the story in general. Like the point I made about the synopsis, these are boring verbs. Some are fine, but the more you use, the more it saps the action from your story, and action is interesting. Being isn't. And just like the synopsis, it's especially important to have the early part of the story grab the reader's attention.

>She choked back a sob and she ran her hoof down the wall.//

There's a section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. You need one here for the dependent clause.

>even chipping a little//

>Little flecks of paint chipped off//
These are only a few sentences apart. More repetition.

>Pinkie reached out a hoof and softly ran her hoof//

Normally, I'll only point out one or two instances of something before letting you find the rest, but I really wanted to hammer home how much repetition you're doing.

>It has been a mistake to go there.//

Why the switch to present tense?

>Pinkie ran her hoof on the ground to wipe the flecks of paint off.//

Scroll down so that this line is near the bottom of your screen. Then look back up the screen at the first word of each paragraph.

>As she drew closer, she hesitated for a moment when she saw the state that the building was in.//

You have conflicting timings here. "As" clauses mean things happen at the same time, so she hesitates while she's still getting closer? She'd have to stop first. And then the "when" bit triggers the onet of the hesitation, but you'd already set up a chronology, and they're competing for attention. You have to pay attention to the order things happen in, and keep them in a logical order. Most people would 1) draw closer, 2) see the state of the building, 3) hesitate. You have her 1) see the state of the building, 2) draw closer and hesitate at the same time.

>Rarity had clearly been sleeping.//

Here's another thing you have going on. You've given me plenty of evidence to deduce this on my own. Coming right out and saying it anyway is just over-explaining things.

>and she leaned one of her legs one the doorway as if to keep herself from collapsing//

This is phrased as Rarity's perception, since Pinkie would actually know whether she was trying to keep herself from collapsing. But the story had been from Pinkie's perspective so far. Why switch to Rarity? Not that you can't but it has to be carefully considered and done smoothly. There's also a section at the top of this thread on head hopping which will explain.

>Pinkie's lower jaw began quivering.//

It just did that a couple of paragraphs back, so this is hardly it "beginning" to do so. Also note that "begin" and "start" actions are rarely necessary, and are often overused by inexperienced authors.

>Pinkie Pie's lower jaw quivered//

Again?

>she collapsed onto her haunches to being crying again//

That's just awkwardly phrased.

>Landed//

Why is that capitalized?

>I’m sorry Dashie.//

Missing comma for direct address.

>She threw her forelegs around Rainbow Dash's shoulders//

>she wrapped her forelegs around Pinkie's shoulders//
More repetition.

>"That isn't you," Rainbow Dash insisted. "You're not nearly as selfish as they were. They only cared about having fun for themselves, not for other ponies."//

Dash's dialogue is all coming across as pretty bland. You could substitute in any other character, and it wouldn't sound out of place, though it wouldn't have any of their personal touches, either. And I guess that's the point. This doesn't really sound like Dash.

>But my mistake in this instance almost erased me from existence//

You're starting to lose me on authentic-sounding Pinkie dialogue as well. Not so much the mood, but the phrasing and word choice.

I didn't catch you using much telly language, so good on that front. You have huge amounts of repetition, though. I pointed out quite a few instances, and to help illustrate, of the easier forms to check, I counted 117 "to be" verbs. You need to be choosing more active verbs. This is a rate of almost one every other sentence, so every third or fourth verb you use isn't doing anything.

The one plot issue I'd bring up is that Pinkie wants reassurances that the clones didn't endure a painful end, and she wants to talk to Twilight about that. Even her friends refer her to Twilight, but she never gets there. The resolution of that conflict is to sweep it under the rug. That's a very unsatisfying conclusion, and I can't believe it would allay Pinkie's worries for any length of time. This plot thread just gets dropped.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She seeks the comforting help of one of her best friends, and she is more than happy to help.//</span><br />The second &quot;she&quot; is ambiguous. I&#039;d recommend &quot;who&quot; in place of &quot;and she.&quot; However, this is also the second &quot;to be&quot; verb in your synopsis. I&#039;d also recommend trying to keep those out of a synopsis, unless it&#039;s really the only way to avoid an awkward phrasing, since these verbs aren&#039;t very good at grabbing anyone&#039;s interest.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Night had fallen over Ponyville as the shimmering moon raised in the sky.//</span><br />Your synchronizing two things here that would really happen in sequence. And &quot;raised&quot; takes a direct object. You want &quot;rose.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even though night had fallen//</span><br />You&#039;re not calling attention to this as any sort of thematic repetition, so it just feels like an oversight. Your opening sentence used almost the exact phrasing, and it&#039;s just repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a dozen or so of her clones//</span><br />There were a lot more than that. Just go back and look at the scene where they were all gathered inside.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;listened to the crickets chirping their serene call. Ponyville was truly down for the night as Pinkie Pie was alone in listening to the crickets//</span><br />More obtrusive repetition. You also have five &quot;to be&quot; verbs in this paragraph alone, and I&#039;m seeing a lot in the story in general. Like the point I made about the synopsis, these are boring verbs. Some are fine, but the more you use, the more it saps the action from your story, and action is interesting. Being isn&#039;t. And just like the synopsis, it&#039;s especially important to have the early part of the story grab the reader&#039;s attention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She choked back a sob and she ran her hoof down the wall.//</span><br />There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. You need one here for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even chipping a little//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Little flecks of paint chipped off//</span><br />These are only a few sentences apart. More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie reached out a hoof and softly ran her hoof//</span><br />Normally, I&#039;ll only point out one or two instances of something before letting you find the rest, but I really wanted to hammer home how much repetition you&#039;re doing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It has been a mistake to go there.//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie ran her hoof on the ground to wipe the flecks of paint off.//</span><br />Scroll down so that this line is near the bottom of your screen. Then look back up the screen at the first word of each paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she drew closer, she hesitated for a moment when she saw the state that the building was in.//</span><br />You have conflicting timings here. &quot;As&quot; clauses mean things happen at the same time, so she hesitates while she&#039;s still getting closer? She&#039;d have to stop first. And then the &quot;when&quot; bit triggers the onet of the hesitation, but you&#039;d already set up a chronology, and they&#039;re competing for attention. You have to pay attention to the order things happen in, and keep them in a logical order. Most people would 1) draw closer, 2) see the state of the building, 3) hesitate. You have her 1) see the state of the building, 2) draw closer and hesitate at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity had clearly been sleeping.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another thing you have going on. You&#039;ve given me plenty of evidence to deduce this on my own. Coming right out and saying it anyway is just over-explaining things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she leaned one of her legs one the doorway as if to keep herself from collapsing//</span><br />This is phrased as Rarity&#039;s perception, since Pinkie would actually know whether she was trying to keep herself from collapsing. But the story had been from Pinkie&#039;s perspective so far. Why switch to Rarity? Not that you can&#039;t but it has to be carefully considered and done smoothly. There&#039;s also a section at the top of this thread on head hopping which will explain.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie&#039;s lower jaw began quivering.//</span><br />It just did that a couple of paragraphs back, so this is hardly it &quot;beginning&quot; to do so. Also note that &quot;begin&quot; and &quot;start&quot; actions are rarely necessary, and are often overused by inexperienced authors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie&#039;s lower jaw quivered//</span><br />Again?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she collapsed onto her haunches to being crying again//</span><br />That&#039;s just awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Landed//</span><br />Why is that capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sorry Dashie.//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She threw her forelegs around Rainbow Dash&#039;s shoulders//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she wrapped her forelegs around Pinkie&#039;s shoulders//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;That isn&#039;t you,&quot; Rainbow Dash insisted. &quot;You&#039;re not nearly as selfish as they were. They only cared about having fun for themselves, not for other ponies.&quot;//</span><br />Dash&#039;s dialogue is all coming across as pretty bland. You could substitute in any other character, and it wouldn&#039;t sound out of place, though it wouldn&#039;t have any of their personal touches, either. And I guess that&#039;s the point. This doesn&#039;t really sound like Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But my mistake in this instance almost erased me from existence//</span><br />You&#039;re starting to lose me on authentic-sounding Pinkie dialogue as well. Not so much the mood, but the phrasing and word choice.<br /><br />I didn&#039;t catch you using much telly language, so good on that front. You have huge amounts of repetition, though. I pointed out quite a few instances, and to help illustrate, of the easier forms to check, I counted 117 &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You need to be choosing more active verbs. This is a rate of almost one every other sentence, so every third or fourth verb you use isn&#039;t doing anything.<br /><br />The one plot issue I&#039;d bring up is that Pinkie wants reassurances that the clones didn&#039;t endure a painful end, and she wants to talk to Twilight about that. Even her friends refer her to Twilight, but she never gets there. The resolution of that conflict is to sweep it under the rug. That&#039;s a very unsatisfying conclusion, and I can&#039;t believe it would allay Pinkie&#039;s worries for any length of time. This plot thread just gets dropped.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 187

>>130163
Surely insulting me will get me to help you. You've routinely dismissed whatever I've said to you and called the time I invested in you tangential and irrelevant. At this point, I'd have to read your story again to recall specifics, and I'm not going to sink yet more time into this only to be told that you have no intention of listening. It really baffles me how you think your behavior would motivate me to accommodate you at all. As to my mandate, I could have helped two or three other authors in the time I've spent on you, so that is also better served by moving on. You lucked into a pre-reader that helps writers, and if you want to request a different one, you're welcome to, but no pre-reader here will be receptive to a pat and rushed romance like hundreds of others we've rejected. You're not going to get anywhere without addressing that. There's your succinct statement. This is far and above the feedback we are required to give, so if you really want the standard treatment, then here it is:

No.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130163" onclick="return highlight('130163', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130163">&gt;&gt;130163</a><br />Surely insulting me will get me to help you. You&#039;ve routinely dismissed whatever I&#039;ve said to you and called the time I invested in you tangential and irrelevant. At this point, I&#039;d have to read your story again to recall specifics, and I&#039;m not going to sink yet more time into this only to be told that you have no intention of listening. It really baffles me how you think your behavior would motivate me to accommodate you at all. As to my mandate, I could have helped two or three other authors in the time I&#039;ve spent on you, so that is also better served by moving on. You lucked into a pre-reader that helps writers, and if you want to request a different one, you&#039;re welcome to, but no pre-reader here will be receptive to a pat and rushed romance like hundreds of others we&#039;ve rejected. You&#039;re not going to get anywhere without addressing that. There&#039;s your succinct statement. This is far and above the feedback we are required to give, so if you really want the standard treatment, then here it is:<br /><br />No.<br />

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 188

>>130166

I'm not insulting you. Okay, yeah, I've been a bit snippy out frustration, and for that I apologise. But beyond that I've tried to avoid saying anything bad about you as a person. I've even tried to interpret your intentions charitably. I have criticised your conduct where it's been uncivil and your arguments where they've been muddled, and I've been forthright about doing so. If I say your arguments are poor, it's because they're poor. But since you've made this thread, you must see the value in open criticism. If I were criticising someone's work, I'd expect no less.

Nor have I routinely dismissed anything you've said. I accepted nearly all the criticism you gave initially. Of those I challenged you on, I acquiesced to all but one. For that last one, I've been making a prolonged effort to understand what the problem actually is. That's anything but a dismissal. (Don't get me wrong – I will challenge criticism if I think it's poor, because I care about writing well, and I'd take rather a good story that gets rejected than a mediocre one that gets to EQD. But a challenge is not a dismissal. And I do listen to an ponder over every piece of advice I get.)

>At this point, I'd have to read your story again to recall specifics


I think this is the problem. At the risk of trespassing on your intentions – it looks like you have an issue with the story, but can't actually remember what it is beyond something vague like being unrealistic or cliched. (Which I can't do anything with, since I'm getting nearly everything from real life romance). The last concrete thing you pointed to is something that isn't in the story. Neither of us need to be here and I owe you nothing, I know. But I'm being held up by a you problem you have that you can't even remember. I hope you see why that's just a little bit galling.


ETA:
I wanted to leave this until after things were settled so it didn't sound insincere. Now I've effectively managed a permanent rejection, I think they are. Thank you again for the time and effort you've put in. Most of what you said was helpful, and I really do appreciate it.

Take care.

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130166" onclick="return highlight('130166', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130166">&gt;&gt;130166</a><br /><br />I&#039;m not insulting you. Okay, yeah, I&#039;ve been a bit snippy out frustration, and for that I apologise. But beyond that I&#039;ve tried to avoid saying anything bad about you as a person. I&#039;ve even tried to interpret your intentions charitably. I <i>have</i> criticised your conduct where it&#039;s been uncivil and your arguments where they&#039;ve been muddled, and I&#039;ve been forthright about doing so. If I say your arguments are poor, it&#039;s because they&#039;re poor. But since you&#039;ve made this thread, you must see the value in open criticism. If I were criticising someone&#039;s work, I&#039;d expect no less.<br /><br />Nor have I routinely dismissed anything you&#039;ve said. I accepted nearly all the criticism you gave initially. Of those I challenged you on, I acquiesced to all but one. For that last one, I&#039;ve been making a prolonged effort to understand what the problem actually is. That&#039;s anything but a dismissal. (Don&#039;t get me wrong – I will <i>challenge</i> criticism if I think it&#039;s poor, because I care about writing well, and I&#039;d take rather a good story that gets rejected than a mediocre one that gets to EQD. But a challenge is not a dismissal. And I do listen to an ponder over every piece of advice I get.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At this point, I&#039;d have to read your story again to recall specifics</span><br /><br />I think this is the problem. At the risk of trespassing on your intentions – it looks like you have an issue with the story, but can&#039;t actually remember what it is beyond something vague like being unrealistic or cliched. (Which I can&#039;t do anything with, since I&#039;m getting nearly everything from real life romance). The last concrete thing you pointed to is something that isn&#039;t in the story. Neither of us need to be here and I owe you nothing, I know. But I&#039;m being held up by a you problem you have that you can&#039;t even remember. I hope you see why that&#039;s just a little bit galling.<br /><br /><br />ETA:<br />I wanted to leave this until after things were settled so it didn&#039;t sound insincere. Now I&#039;ve effectively managed a permanent rejection, I think they are. Thank you again for the time and effort you&#039;ve put in. Most of what you said was helpful, and I really do appreciate it.<br /><br />Take care.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Apr 12th, 2014 09:14</span></div><br/>

S&SCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 189

>>130164

I'm not your dude, buddy.

Nah, you have a point, Anon. I was treating a public thread like private correspondence. I'll duck out now. Have fun.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130164" onclick="return highlight('130164', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130164">&gt;&gt;130164</a><br /><br />I&#039;m not your dude, buddy.<br /><br />Nah, you have a point, Anon. I was treating a public thread like private correspondence. I&#039;ll duck out now. Have fun.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Apr 12th, 2014 09:18</span></div><br/>

Awaken, Scootaloo EQD Feedback Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 190

>>130147

I don't really see the issue with Scoot's aunt as piling on. It's not in addition to her inability to fly. It's the root cause. We are drilling down past the obvious and moving into her true motivations. She can't fly because she's got all this mental baggage weighing her down, and this is the baggage.

Now, having said that, I'm sure I can find a way to do it that is more satisfying. You are certainly correct that Luna should take a stronger stance in some direction regarding that revelation. I'll be revisiting it in a few weeks and I'll work on that.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130147" onclick="return highlight('130147', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130147">&gt;&gt;130147</a><br /><br />I don&#039;t really see the issue with Scoot&#039;s aunt as piling on. It&#039;s not in addition to her inability to fly. It&#039;s the root cause. We are drilling down past the obvious and moving into her true motivations. She can&#039;t fly because she&#039;s got all this mental baggage weighing her down, and this is the baggage.<br /><br />Now, having said that, I&#039;m sure I can find a way to do it that is more satisfying. You are certainly correct that Luna should take a stronger stance in some direction regarding that revelation. I&#039;ll be revisiting it in a few weeks and I&#039;ll work on that.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 191

>>130175
It's possibly not piling on if you give it a reason for being there, but you hadn't made that connection before, so it felt more like being there for the sake of being there. Neither Scootaloo nor Luna alleged any sort of causation. If Luna's not going to bring it up, then it'll take some thought as to why she doesn't or why it never occurs to her. If this kind of anxiety has this result, Scootaloo certainly can't be the first pegasus who's ever experienced it. And be careful wandering into orphaned/abused Scootaloo. It's a cliched enough thing that you have to get it just right, or it does little more than induce an eye roll.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130175" onclick="return highlight('130175', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130175">&gt;&gt;130175</a><br />It&#039;s possibly not piling on if you give it a reason for being there, but you hadn&#039;t made that connection before, so it felt more like being there for the sake of being there. Neither Scootaloo nor Luna alleged any sort of causation. If Luna&#039;s not going to bring it up, then it&#039;ll take some thought as to why she doesn&#039;t or why it never occurs to her. If this kind of anxiety has this result, Scootaloo certainly can&#039;t be the first pegasus who&#039;s ever experienced it. And be careful wandering into orphaned/abused Scootaloo. It&#039;s a cliched enough thing that you have to get it just right, or it does little more than induce an eye roll.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 192

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>velvet-dark//

There's no inherent comparison for the simile here, as velvet doesn't have to be dark.

>She looks up with a feeling of unease.//

There are times you can get away with this, but right here at the beginning of the story is somewhere you need to forge a connection with the reader. Read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Where is the herd?//

This has a nicer sound to it, but technically a group of ponies is a string. I wouldn't blame you for ignoring that.

>Where is.. is… the thing.//

It's a question, isn't it?

>Muffled sounds—the chewing of grass, faint whickers and whinnies—sound all about me.//

To illustrate, I'll remove the aside. "Muffled sounds sound all about me." See the problem now?

>It must be!//

You're finally giving me some emotion. The short, clipped sentences you're using almost exclusively work for someone in the middle of action (not the case), very young (physically, yes, but it's an older mind inhabiting the dream), or emotional turmoil (which you could have, but don't). She's gotten a little emotional over what she's trying to find, but not about things like finding herself among the herd (wouldn't she take comfort in that?) or having them turn into a forest (wouldn't this surprise or scare her?).

>It is me.//

You need to decide whether she's going to affect an adult's or child's voice. Her "I shall too" is rather adult, but this is more childlike in its missed grammar ("It is I").

>It smirks at me.//

She just said she has trouble seeing it. So how is she going to recognize a nuanced expression like a smirk?

>“Ha! You cannot—you are me. And I am you.”//

This is probably not the best conversation to skimp on the nonverbal cues. You're not quite this bad, but you might want to read the section at the top of this thread on talking heads to see the rationale of why it's important at an emotional crux like this.

>casting a stark shadow beneath me.//

If she was asleep, how is there a shadow beneath her? Was she sleeping standing up?

>I have found the moon, the thing that was missing from the night sky. My moon. I know that it belongs to me. It is on my flanks because it is mine. Now that it is in the sky, all should be well.//

You get somewhat of a pass in dialogue, but watch the "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring and bring action to a standstill. Five of them in a short paragraph… You can probably find ways to rephrase this using active verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is.

>The stone rises, smooth and perfect, all around me.//

Rather repetitive with the scene's second sentence, and I don't see a thematic reason for doing so.

>In the brilliant light the crumbling walls//

This is already the fourth use of "crumbling" in the scene, and again, there's no thematic tie for doing so. If you're being deliberately repetitive, it needs to be obviously intentional, which usually involves putting some sort of emphasis on it so the reader can tell what you're doing.

>I yearn towards it.//

But I don't get that feeling from her, because she states it as a cold fact. This is why showing is so important. I want to know what thought flashes through her head, what physical symptoms it causes, etc.

>still missing//

You're using that as a compound modifier, so hyphenate it.

>The whispers grow louder, more mocking. I run faster, but I trip and fall. The whispers laugh at me, their voices merging into one voice, that mocking voice that is almost, but not quite, my own.//

Again, let me see how this makes her feel. It's all stated as cold fact, so it doesn't get me to identify with her. The repetition of "mocking" almost works here, since you've used "that" to point it out, but the first use refers to multiple whispers, so it doesn't quite match up.

>Let me past//

You sure you didn't mean "Let me pass"?

>Give up! Lay down!//

Lay/lie confusion. And this may just be me, but the up/down juxtaposition here creates an almost comical effect that's at odds with the atmosphere you're trying to create.

>crumbling into gravel beneath me. The floor beneath my hind hooves crumbles too//

More crumbling, huh?

>Does another orb hang beside the moon? I approach, but when I arrive, the tapestry contains only a single pony; a blue figure with wings and horn, curved around a dark moon which shows a bright crescent.//

Misused semicolon, as there isn't an independent clause after it. You're actually defining the pony here, so a colon would be appropriate.

>I pull out an old favorite and settled at a table to read.//

Why the switch to past tense?

>and when I turn//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause. You got it right earlier.

>I halt, feeling confused.//

There's leeway for being telly in first person, since it can be awkward for the narrator to describe her own body language, for instance, but there are other ways of doing so. The language itself can imitate confusion, since she's the one speaking.

>The enemy is between it and I.//

People often make this mistake for fear of getting it wrong. It's actually "between it and me."

>It is glorious.//

And there's not much in there to make me believe she thinks so. You have to give me something. Make me feel it with her. You list a bunch of things that are getting her excited, but you don't show her getting excited.

>Our battle rages for a small eternity.//

Yes, but I have no sense of that other than this short line.

I had already assumed your title came from the song of the same name, but let me caution you when using references like that: make sure they make sense. Consider what the song is saying. Everything seems to be a mirage. That works so far. But look at the song's message: "it wouldn't be make-believe if you believed in me." And it says all these things are fake because the singer is "without your love." There's a powerful sentiment that you're missing. Luna does speculate on whether she hates Celestia, which comes at it from a different direction, but it doesn't play up the tie between illusion and loving/being loved. The song obviously means it in an optimistic way, as in Luna believing in Celestia, but it could also be twisted into Luna's belief in Nightmare Moon. Either way, there's a big difference between "the title sounded cool, and the literal meaning applies" and "I can gain some deeper understanding of the story from the reference."

So, it should be clear by now that the major problem here is the lack of an emotional connection to the character. Most everything is told as stark facts, and I don't get much context as to how Luna feels about it. You have to draw me in and get me to empathize with her situation, but just using blunt assessments of her mood isn't the way to do that.

Another is that this was just chock full of "to be" verbs. I've already explained why they're good to limit, so I'll just hit you with the numbers. Of the easier forms to search for, I counted 86. That's about one every 35 words. Normally, that'd be about one every other sentence, but you tend to use such short sentences that it's not quite that often for you. But it's still the same word frequency. That's also about 13 times per page, so just consider there are that many instances on each page where something doesn't happen.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;velvet-dark//</span><br />There&#039;s no inherent comparison for the simile here, as velvet doesn&#039;t have to be dark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looks up with a feeling of unease.//</span><br />There are times you can get away with this, but right here at the beginning of the story is somewhere you need to forge a connection with the reader. Read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Where is the herd?//</span><br />This has a nicer sound to it, but technically a group of ponies is a string. I wouldn&#039;t blame you for ignoring that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Where is.. is… the thing.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Muffled sounds—the chewing of grass, faint whickers and whinnies—sound all about me.//</span><br />To illustrate, I&#039;ll remove the aside. &quot;Muffled sounds sound all about me.&quot; See the problem now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It must be!//</span><br />You&#039;re finally giving me some emotion. The short, clipped sentences you&#039;re using almost exclusively work for someone in the middle of action (not the case), very young (physically, yes, but it&#039;s an older mind inhabiting the dream), or emotional turmoil (which you could have, but don&#039;t). She&#039;s gotten a little emotional over what she&#039;s trying to find, but not about things like finding herself among the herd (wouldn&#039;t she take comfort in that?) or having them turn into a forest (wouldn&#039;t this surprise or scare her?).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It is me.//</span><br />You need to decide whether she&#039;s going to affect an adult&#039;s or child&#039;s voice. Her &quot;I shall too&quot; is rather adult, but this is more childlike in its missed grammar (&quot;It is I&quot;).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It smirks at me.//</span><br />She just said she has trouble seeing it. So how is she going to recognize a nuanced expression like a smirk?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Ha! You cannot—you are me. And I am you.”//</span><br />This is probably not the best conversation to skimp on the nonverbal cues. You&#039;re not quite this bad, but you might want to read the section at the top of this thread on talking heads to see the rationale of why it&#039;s important at an emotional crux like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;casting a stark shadow beneath me.//</span><br />If she was asleep, how is there a shadow beneath her? Was she sleeping standing up?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have found the moon, the thing that was missing from the night sky. My moon. I know that it belongs to me. It is on my flanks because it is mine. Now that it is in the sky, all should be well.//</span><br />You get somewhat of a pass in dialogue, but watch the &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring and bring action to a standstill. Five of them in a short paragraph… You can probably find ways to rephrase this using active verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stone rises, smooth and perfect, all around me.//</span><br />Rather repetitive with the scene&#039;s second sentence, and I don&#039;t see a thematic reason for doing so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In the brilliant light the crumbling walls//</span><br />This is already the fourth use of &quot;crumbling&quot; in the scene, and again, there&#039;s no thematic tie for doing so. If you&#039;re being deliberately repetitive, it needs to be obviously intentional, which usually involves putting some sort of emphasis on it so the reader can tell what you&#039;re doing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I yearn towards it.//</span><br />But I don&#039;t get that feeling from her, because she states it as a cold fact. This is why showing is so important. I want to know what thought flashes through her head, what physical symptoms it causes, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still missing//</span><br />You&#039;re using that as a compound modifier, so hyphenate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The whispers grow louder, more mocking. I run faster, but I trip and fall. The whispers laugh at me, their voices merging into one voice, that mocking voice that is almost, but not quite, my own.//</span><br />Again, let me see how this makes her feel. It&#039;s all stated as cold fact, so it doesn&#039;t get me to identify with her. The repetition of &quot;mocking&quot; almost works here, since you&#039;ve used &quot;that&quot; to point it out, but the first use refers to multiple whispers, so it doesn&#039;t quite match up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Let me past//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;Let me pass&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Give up! Lay down!//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. And this may just be me, but the up/down juxtaposition here creates an almost comical effect that&#039;s at odds with the atmosphere you&#039;re trying to create.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crumbling into gravel beneath me. The floor beneath my hind hooves crumbles too//</span><br />More crumbling, huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Does another orb hang beside the moon? I approach, but when I arrive, the tapestry contains only a single pony; a blue figure with wings and horn, curved around a dark moon which shows a bright crescent.//</span><br />Misused semicolon, as there isn&#039;t an independent clause after it. You&#039;re actually defining the pony here, so a colon would be appropriate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I pull out an old favorite and settled at a table to read.//</span><br />Why the switch to past tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when I turn//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause. You got it right earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I halt, feeling confused.//</span><br />There&#039;s leeway for being telly in first person, since it can be awkward for the narrator to describe her own body language, for instance, but there are other ways of doing so. The language itself can imitate confusion, since she&#039;s the one speaking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The enemy is between it and I.//</span><br />People often make this mistake for fear of getting it wrong. It&#039;s actually &quot;between it and me.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It is glorious.//</span><br />And there&#039;s not much in there to make me believe she thinks so. You have to give me something. Make me feel it with her. You list a bunch of things that are getting her excited, but you don&#039;t show her getting excited.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Our battle rages for a small eternity.//</span><br />Yes, but I have no sense of that other than this short line.<br /><br />I had already assumed your title came from the song of the same name, but let me caution you when using references like that: make sure they make sense. Consider what the song is saying. Everything seems to be a mirage. That works so far. But look at the song&#039;s message: &quot;it wouldn&#039;t be make-believe if you believed in me.&quot; And it says all these things are fake because the singer is &quot;without your love.&quot; There&#039;s a powerful sentiment that you&#039;re missing. Luna does speculate on whether she hates Celestia, which comes at it from a different direction, but it doesn&#039;t play up the tie between illusion and loving/being loved. The song obviously means it in an optimistic way, as in Luna believing in Celestia, but it could also be twisted into Luna&#039;s belief in Nightmare Moon. Either way, there&#039;s a big difference between &quot;the title sounded cool, and the literal meaning applies&quot; and &quot;I can gain some deeper understanding of the story from the reference.&quot;<br /><br />So, it should be clear by now that the major problem here is the lack of an emotional connection to the character. Most everything is told as stark facts, and I don&#039;t get much context as to how Luna feels about it. You have to draw me in and get me to empathize with her situation, but just using blunt assessments of her mood isn&#039;t the way to do that.<br /><br />Another is that this was just chock full of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. I&#039;ve already explained why they&#039;re good to limit, so I&#039;ll just hit you with the numbers. Of the easier forms to search for, I counted 86. That&#039;s about one every 35 words. Normally, that&#039;d be about one every other sentence, but you tend to use such short sentences that it&#039;s not quite that often for you. But it&#039;s still the same word frequency. That&#039;s also about 13 times per page, so just consider there are that many instances on each page where something <i>doesn&#039;t</i> happen.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Apr 21st, 2014 18:39</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 193

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>an unicorn//

Typo.

>He pulls back as a loose rock stumbles down in front of his hooves, disappearing into the gorge below.//

You have to be careful with participles, as they can commonly be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like his hooves are disappearing.

>saddleback//

Did you mean "saddlebag"?

>he asked wearily//

Why is this past tense?

>the pure despise in the eyes of his assailant//

"Despise" isn't a noun.

>lavendel//

Typo.

>Rar’//

You generally don't need apostrophes for nicknames, as they're short by nature.

>Flutters//

Consider how she'd actually pronounce this cutoff. Since there isn't an "s" sound in the word, would she really stop on one?

>keep company to a senior pony //

Odd phrasing.

>His attempts to rise up prove as futile as on the last time//

Extraneous "on."

>Yes, this is my bedroom. Good to see that they have not robbed my books, nor my chest, although something tells me that they didn’t come here for my property in the first place.//

This voicing served him well at the beginning of the story, where he had the time and space to observe everything around his home. But here, it's really at odds with his situation. He's injured, surrounded by potential enemies, and tied down, and probably not at full mental capacity from the knock on the head. Is he really going to think this carefully and poetically to himself? It's undoing his dire circumstances.

>to fake sleep//

And here you've crossed the line to over-explanation.

>everytime I close my eyes, every time//

Inconsistent spelling (two words are appropriate here).

>lavendel//

Again with this. Is it a British spelling? In any case, it's throwing me for a loop, and you'd much rather have my attention on the story instead of the word choice.

>The alicorn//

You're really bordering on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome here, especially since he's heard their names. In fact, he heard Twilight's just now.

Yeah, this dialogue is really stiff. I can't imagine real people in similar situation speaking in such a formal and rehearsed manner.

>three unicorns, hiding in a cellar, covering in the dark, avoiding one anothers faces//

I have to think you meant "cowering." And you're missing an apostrophe.

>various fragile items//

That's incredibly vague and hardly worth mentioning.

>as in trance//

Missing an "a."

>to his surprisement//

Why not just "to his surprise"? I don't see what the more complex word accomplishes, other than speaking down to the reader.

You did better earlier in the story, but I'm getting an awful lot of telly language about now.

>First his sees//

Typo, otherwise just awkwardly phrased.

>“Got the rules, Professor?”//

This is more a guideline than a rule, but you generally don't want to switch back and forth between speech and narration more than twice in a paragraph. Here, you have four isolated instances of speech.

>whom you’ve let loose//

I don't believe for a second that Rainbow Dash knows how to use "whom" correctly.

>just get out here//

They already are. Perhaps you meant "out of here"?

>whispers the yellow pegasus//

The exact speaking verb and LUS-type description you used for her last speech.

>I’ll be on the nearest cloud you can spot on the sky//

in the sky

>her half closed eyes//

Missing a hyphen for the compound modifier.

>I’m not sure that its wise//

Its/it's confusion.

>laying on her stomach//

Lay/lie confusion.

>pain envelopes his ribs and chest//

envelops

>*cough*//

Don't put sound effects in narration like this.

(I may end up repeating some things from chapter 1, since I've gone some time since reading it, and I don't remember many details about what I said about it.)

>Thin mist enrobes the city like a cape, limiting the stallion’s view to only a few blocks.//

Capes don't generally obstruct vision. Maybe you should go with a cloak?

>Above the blanket of haze, he can see the sun glinting in the Eastern horizon//

"On" the horizon, and why is "Eastern" capitalized?

>while following the shadow grow against the opposite house wall//

Verb form is off, and this really calls for a possessive (house's wall).

>an array of blankets piled on top of each other stir//

Subject-verb number agreement: array stir.

>the cream-white mare with raven mane//

I assume the stallion knows what she looks like,, but it's still odd for you to give me a description of her when she's covered, so in my mind's eye, I can't see her because of the blankets, yet I somehow see through them.

>Arch Freight walks over to her quietly, and plants a kiss on her idly swaying forehead.//

Unneeded comma. It doesn't start a new clause.

>How can it be misty this time of the year//

It's a question, isn't it?

>droopes//

Typo.

>The cold in the room allies with his heavy eyelids//

Unless it's cold to the point of causing hypothermia, cold actually would help him stay awake, relatively speaking.

>He turns away from his family, and leaves the room.//

Another unnecessary comma.

>tenement//

An unusual word like this really sticks out when you repeat it too soon. You just used it in the previous paragraph.

>Still they go on as in trance//

In a trance.

>All and all//

The phrase is "all in all."

>head to the downtown//

Head downtown.

At this point, I'll say that I realize idioms and preposition choice can be really difficult things to get right when they're not in your first language. I can't keep pointing these out. I've already spent several hours reading and taking notes on this story, and I'm barely into chapter 2. What you really need is just someone who will read the story and help you reword all the odd phrasings.

>pa//

When used as a name or term of address, family members are capitalized. You'll need to go through the whole chapter for these. I saw a lot of them.

>I did for nopony else than for you and for your mother; for us. //

Misused semicolon. There isn't an independent clause after it.

>eyeing wearily the shadows that spread from the lifeless apartments//

Are you sure you didn't mean "warily"?

>The stallion takes a step towards the nearest half-opened door, and pushes it gently with a hoof.//

Another unnecessary comma. There's a section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions that explains the basics of when to use commas with compound structures. You do this occasionally, so you'll need to sweep the whole story for them.

>Arch Fright//

Typo. I see several instances of this one.

>Furniture lies scattered and broken in the living room that he finds beyond the hall//

This is coming in the wrong order. You mention the furniture before the room.

>they can’t be having blood in them//

Another really awkward phrasing.

>Trees do not//

Sure they do. Cut them deep enough, and sap comes out.

>dependant//

dependent

>the Castle’s storages//

More awkward phrasing.

>All dressed in armor and military uniforms, he can feel their stares//

As phrased, "All dressed in armor and military uniforms" describes "he." While I believe he's waering armor and a uniform, you r use of the plural "uniforms" makes it clear you meant to refer to the whole group.

>All the four other stallions//

Awkward

>mailed hoof//

Why would he wear this? Standard foot protection is more like boots or greaves, and a hoof isn't vulnerable to attack anyway. It's very hard on its own.

>the way how you all talked over one another//

Awkward

>his round glasses hiding his eyes behind the glimmer of his coat//

I can't tell whether you're saying his glasses hide his eyes or his coat does.

>while our storages are supplemented on a daily basis//

Awkward

>Uneasy tranquil descends//

Awkward. This would normally be phrased with "an," and "tranquil" isn't a noun.

>the one called Proud Freight//

This suggests unfamiliarity, but I don't know where it's coming from. An omniscient narrator wouldn't do this, and the perspective has been with Shining Armor, who should know him well.

>who harbors intents//

Awkward

>I’m not speaking behalf of my emotions, but with them.//

Usually "on behalf of," but this sentence just doesn't make any sense to me.

>the air patrols have registered strange burst of magical energy//

Typo

>pegasi fight back as if their life//

There's more than one of them. Lives.

>fulfil it's purpose//

Its/it's confusion.

>That could even be the reason why Canterlot was attacked in the first place; to create the Device.//

Another misused semicolon.

>The only need to know that now//

Awkward

>if Chrysalis had been capable of seducing the entire Canterlot//

The entire Canterlot what?

>Mayhaps//

mayhap

>Cloud Shield shuns his eyes//

Typo.

>–you became//

Capitalize. He's not picking up a sentence he left off earlier, and grammatically speaking, it isn't even an incomplete sentence.

>raise you right hoof//

Typo.

>Four pairs of eyes nail at Proud Freight//

Awkward

>in the question of this magnitude//

Awkward

>on the mountains spotted with pines and rivers//

For one thing, this makes it sound like you're saying only one mountain range has pines and rivers, and that's the one you mean. For another, "spotted" isn't the best word choice for rivers.

>Twilight watches the midday sun the way she has never before; with scorn.//

Another misused semicolon. Here, you're clarifying or defining something, so a colon would be appropriate.

>It’s the same as on the day as I was born//

Awkward. You don't need that second "as."

>She wipes her eyes, and looks at Rainbow Dash who soars next to her//

The comma you have shouldn't be there, and you've missed a comma that should.

>“Okay, it’s done…what happened to you?” she asks//

Missing end punctuation.

>And if he still hasn’t got the idea//

Verb form.

>Dash frownes her brows//

Awkward.

>but…I’m//

You're inconsistent at leaving a space after an ellipsis.

>Next time I’m trying to kill him//

Awkward.

>She looks each one of them into the eyes//

Awkward.

>says Twilight calmly//

This is the fourth straight piece of dialogue that is said in some "-ly" manner. You're pushing it on being telly here.

>He thinks that we will kill him for what he did in the Project, of course he doesn’t want to talk about it!//

Comma splice.

>narrowes//

Typo.

>Fluttershy seems to shrink under their stares.//

Here's a problem you have sometimes. Your narrator has been very objective through this scene, but use of the word "seem" puts in it someone's perspective, because it's a judgment, not a fact. I just don't know whose. To whom does she "seem" to shrink?

>And like said//

Missing a word.

>But this is a serious level villain we’re talking about!//

Awkward.

>They are both laying on their stomachs//

Lay/lie confusion.

>And before Fluttershy has even properly realized what has happened, she finds herself staring at the stallion unicorn whose life she has saved from the hate of her best friend.//

And only two sentences later:
>The stallion studies the pegasus with a blank expression, fighting to keep his tension inside.//
See the wild swing of perspective between these two characters? You don't want to jerk the reader around like that.

>Fluttershy almost jump on all fours.//

Verb form.

>We saw them all, Draught Tear//

Look how often she addresses him by name in this conversation. Then think about how often you'd actually do that if talking to a friend. It's making her dialogue feel artificial.

>“Bitch Queen”//

This is already inside a quotation, so you need to use single quotation marks for it.

>during it’s short existence//

Its/it's confusion.

>Stand back or I’ll wring her neck around!//

Awkward. And missing a comma.

>Fluttershy’s neck twist//

Verb conjugation.

>Keep you eyes closed.//

Typo.

>disappears in a way of a mirage//

Awkward

>Without a warning//

Awkward

I really had it in my head that I was going to give you a full review of everything you'd written so far. But I've spent over four hours making notes already, and I'm only through the second chapter. The only complaints I have about the story that are attributable to you are these:

1) I'm increasingly seeing adverbs used as stand-ins for meaningful emotional content, particularly attached to speaking verbs. This is getting telly, and if you don't know what that means, there's a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

2) Your characters are starting to blend together for me. We have the mysterious Project stallion, Arch Freight (whose name you consistently misspell), his father, and the rest of the generals. They all have pretty indiscernable personalities. All strong, stoic, introspective, and using similar word choice. I should be able to tell them apart just from small snippets their actions or dialogue, but they all sound like minor variations on the same template.

And lastly, one that's not your fault. See how many times I left a comment that only said "awkward"? This just comes from day-to-day familiarity with English, and what you really need is someone who can read the entire story through and mark all these for you, maybe even suggest changes to make them sound more natural. This is the biggest issue with the story, and it would only take a regular reader or a proofreader to handle that for you. It's a well-written story, and I'd like to see it on the blog, but the sheer number of these awkward phrasings kept wrecking my sense of immersion.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an unicorn//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He pulls back as a loose rock stumbles down in front of his hooves, disappearing into the gorge below.//</span><br />You have to be careful with participles, as they can commonly be misplaced modifiers. By proximity, it sounds like his hooves are disappearing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saddleback//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;saddlebag&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he asked wearily//</span><br />Why is this past tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the pure despise in the eyes of his assailant//</span><br />&quot;Despise&quot; isn&#039;t a noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lavendel//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rar’//</span><br />You generally don&#039;t need apostrophes for nicknames, as they&#039;re short by nature.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Flutters//</span><br />Consider how she&#039;d actually pronounce this cutoff. Since there isn&#039;t an &quot;s&quot; sound in the word, would she really stop on one?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;keep company to a senior pony //</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His attempts to rise up prove as futile as on the last time//</span><br />Extraneous &quot;on.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes, this is my bedroom. Good to see that they have not robbed my books, nor my chest, although something tells me that they didn’t come here for my property in the first place.//</span><br />This voicing served him well at the beginning of the story, where he had the time and space to observe everything around his home. But here, it&#039;s really at odds with his situation. He&#039;s injured, surrounded by potential enemies, and tied down, and probably not at full mental capacity from the knock on the head. Is he really going to think this carefully and poetically to himself? It&#039;s undoing his dire circumstances.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to fake sleep//</span><br />And here you&#039;ve crossed the line to over-explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;everytime I close my eyes, every time//</span><br />Inconsistent spelling (two words are appropriate here).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lavendel//</span><br />Again with this. Is it a British spelling? In any case, it&#039;s throwing me for a loop, and you&#039;d much rather have my attention on the story instead of the word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The alicorn//</span><br />You&#039;re really bordering on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome here, especially since he&#039;s heard their names. In fact, he heard Twilight&#039;s just now.<br /><br />Yeah, this dialogue is really stiff. I can&#039;t imagine real people in similar situation speaking in such a formal and rehearsed manner.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;three unicorns, hiding in a cellar, covering in the dark, avoiding one anothers faces//</span><br />I have to think you meant &quot;cowering.&quot; And you&#039;re missing an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;various fragile items//</span><br />That&#039;s incredibly vague and hardly worth mentioning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as in trance//</span><br />Missing an &quot;a.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to his surprisement//</span><br />Why not just &quot;to his surprise&quot;? I don&#039;t see what the more complex word accomplishes, other than speaking down to the reader.<br /><br />You did better earlier in the story, but I&#039;m getting an awful lot of telly language about now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;First his sees//</span><br />Typo, otherwise just awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Got the rules, Professor?”//</span><br />This is more a guideline than a rule, but you generally don&#039;t want to switch back and forth between speech and narration more than twice in a paragraph. Here, you have four isolated instances of speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whom you’ve let loose//</span><br />I don&#039;t believe for a second that Rainbow Dash knows how to use &quot;whom&quot; correctly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just get out here//</span><br />They already are. Perhaps you meant &quot;out of here&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whispers the yellow pegasus//</span><br />The exact speaking verb and LUS-type description you used for her last speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ll be on the nearest cloud you can spot on the sky//</span><br />in the sky<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her half closed eyes//</span><br />Missing a hyphen for the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m not sure that its wise//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying on her stomach//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pain envelopes his ribs and chest//</span><br />envelops<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;*cough*//</span><br />Don&#039;t put sound effects in narration like this.<br /><br />(I may end up repeating some things from chapter 1, since I&#039;ve gone some time since reading it, and I don&#039;t remember many details about what I said about it.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thin mist enrobes the city like a cape, limiting the stallion’s view to only a few blocks.//</span><br />Capes don&#039;t generally obstruct vision. Maybe you should go with a cloak?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Above the blanket of haze, he can see the sun glinting in the Eastern horizon//</span><br />&quot;On&quot; the horizon, and why is &quot;Eastern&quot; capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while following the shadow grow against the opposite house wall//</span><br />Verb form is off, and this really calls for a possessive (house&#039;s wall).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an array of blankets piled on top of each other stir//</span><br />Subject-verb number agreement: array stir.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the cream-white mare with raven mane//</span><br />I assume the stallion knows what she looks like,, but it&#039;s still odd for you to give me a description of her when she&#039;s covered, so in my mind&#039;s eye, I can&#039;t see her because of the blankets, yet I somehow see through them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Arch Freight walks over to her quietly, and plants a kiss on her idly swaying forehead.//</span><br />Unneeded comma. It doesn&#039;t start a new clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How can it be misty this time of the year//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;droopes//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The cold in the room allies with his heavy eyelids//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s cold to the point of causing hypothermia, cold actually would help him stay awake, relatively speaking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He turns away from his family, and leaves the room.//</span><br />Another unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tenement//</span><br />An unusual word like this really sticks out when you repeat it too soon. You just used it in the previous paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Still they go on as in trance//</span><br />In a trance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All and all//</span><br />The phrase is &quot;all in all.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;head to the downtown//</span><br />Head downtown.<br /><br />At this point, I&#039;ll say that I realize idioms and preposition choice can be really difficult things to get right when they&#039;re not in your first language. I can&#039;t keep pointing these out. I&#039;ve already spent several hours reading and taking notes on this story, and I&#039;m barely into chapter 2. What you really need is just someone who will read the story and help you reword all the odd phrasings.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pa//</span><br />When used as a name or term of address, family members are capitalized. You&#039;ll need to go through the whole chapter for these. I saw a lot of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I did for nopony else than for you and for your mother; for us. //</span><br />Misused semicolon. There isn&#039;t an independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyeing wearily the shadows that spread from the lifeless apartments//</span><br />Are you sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;warily&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stallion takes a step towards the nearest half-opened door, and pushes it gently with a hoof.//</span><br />Another unnecessary comma. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions that explains the basics of when to use commas with compound structures. You do this occasionally, so you&#039;ll need to sweep the whole story for them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Arch Fright//</span><br />Typo. I see several instances of this one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Furniture lies scattered and broken in the living room that he finds beyond the hall//</span><br />This is coming in the wrong order. You mention the furniture before the room.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they can’t be having blood in them//</span><br />Another really awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Trees do not//</span><br />Sure they do. Cut them deep enough, and sap comes out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dependant//</span><br />dependent<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Castle’s storages//</span><br />More awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All dressed in armor and military uniforms, he can feel their stares//</span><br />As phrased, &quot;All dressed in armor and military uniforms&quot; describes &quot;he.&quot; While I believe he&#039;s waering armor and a uniform, you r use of the plural &quot;uniforms&quot; makes it clear you meant to refer to the whole group.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All the four other stallions//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mailed hoof//</span><br />Why would he wear this? Standard foot protection is more like boots or greaves, and a hoof isn&#039;t vulnerable to attack anyway. It&#039;s very hard on its own.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the way how you all talked over one another//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his round glasses hiding his eyes behind the glimmer of his coat//</span><br />I can&#039;t tell whether you&#039;re saying his glasses hide his eyes or his coat does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while our storages are supplemented on a daily basis//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Uneasy tranquil descends//</span><br />Awkward. This would normally be phrased with &quot;an,&quot; and &quot;tranquil&quot; isn&#039;t a noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the one called Proud Freight//</span><br />This suggests unfamiliarity, but I don&#039;t know where it&#039;s coming from. An omniscient narrator wouldn&#039;t do this, and the perspective has been with Shining Armor, who should know him well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who harbors intents//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m not speaking behalf of my emotions, but with them.//</span><br />Usually &quot;on behalf of,&quot; but this sentence just doesn&#039;t make any sense to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the air patrols have registered strange burst of magical energy//</span><br />Typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pegasi fight back as if their life//</span><br />There&#039;s more than one of them. Lives.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fulfil it&#039;s purpose//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That could even be the reason why Canterlot was attacked in the first place; to create the Device.//</span><br />Another misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The only need to know that now//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if Chrysalis had been capable of seducing the entire Canterlot//</span><br />The entire Canterlot what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mayhaps//</span><br />mayhap<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cloud Shield shuns his eyes//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;–you became//</span><br />Capitalize. He&#039;s not picking up a sentence he left off earlier, and grammatically speaking, it isn&#039;t even an incomplete sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;raise you right hoof//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Four pairs of eyes nail at Proud Freight//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in the question of this magnitude//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on the mountains spotted with pines and rivers//</span><br />For one thing, this makes it sound like you&#039;re saying only one mountain range has pines and rivers, and that&#039;s the one you mean. For another, &quot;spotted&quot; isn&#039;t the best word choice for rivers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight watches the midday sun the way she has never before; with scorn.//</span><br />Another misused semicolon. Here, you&#039;re clarifying or defining something, so a colon would be appropriate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s the same as on the day as I was born//</span><br />Awkward. You don&#039;t need that second &quot;as.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wipes her eyes, and looks at Rainbow Dash who soars next to her//</span><br />The comma you have shouldn&#039;t be there, and you&#039;ve missed a comma that should.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Okay, it’s done…what happened to you?” she asks//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And if he still hasn’t got the idea//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash frownes her brows//</span><br />Awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but…I’m//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at leaving a space after an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Next time I’m trying to kill him//</span><br />Awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looks each one of them into the eyes//</span><br />Awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;says Twilight calmly//</span><br />This is the fourth straight piece of dialogue that is said in some &quot;-ly&quot; manner. You&#039;re pushing it on being telly here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He thinks that we will kill him for what he did in the Project, of course he doesn’t want to talk about it!//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;narrowes//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy seems to shrink under their stares.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a problem you have sometimes. Your narrator has been very objective through this scene, but use of the word &quot;seem&quot; puts in it <i>someone&#039;s</i> perspective, because it&#039;s a judgment, not a fact. I just don&#039;t know whose. To whom does she &quot;seem&quot; to shrink?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And like said//</span><br />Missing a word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But this is a serious level villain we’re talking about!//</span><br />Awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They are both laying on their stomachs//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And before Fluttershy has even properly realized what has happened, she finds herself staring at the stallion unicorn whose life she has saved from the hate of her best friend.//</span><br />And only two sentences later:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stallion studies the pegasus with a blank expression, fighting to keep his tension inside.//</span><br />See the wild swing of perspective between these two characters? You don&#039;t want to jerk the reader around like that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy almost jump on all fours.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We saw them all, Draught Tear//</span><br />Look how often she addresses him by name in this conversation. Then think about how often you&#039;d actually do that if talking to a friend. It&#039;s making her dialogue feel artificial.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Bitch Queen”//</span><br />This is already inside a quotation, so you need to use single quotation marks for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;during it’s short existence//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Stand back or I’ll wring her neck around!//</span><br />Awkward. And missing a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy’s neck twist//</span><br />Verb conjugation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Keep you eyes closed.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;disappears in a way of a mirage//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without a warning//</span><br />Awkward<br /><br />I really had it in my head that I was going to give you a full review of everything you&#039;d written so far. But I&#039;ve spent over four hours making notes already, and I&#039;m only through the second chapter. The only complaints I have about the story that are attributable to you are these:<br /><br />1) I&#039;m increasingly seeing adverbs used as stand-ins for meaningful emotional content, particularly attached to speaking verbs. This is getting telly, and if you don&#039;t know what that means, there&#039;s a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br />2) Your characters are starting to blend together for me. We have the mysterious Project stallion, Arch Freight (whose name you consistently misspell), his father, and the rest of the generals. They all have pretty indiscernable personalities. All strong, stoic, introspective, and using similar word choice. I should be able to tell them apart just from small snippets their actions or dialogue, but they all sound like minor variations on the same template.<br /><br />And lastly, one that&#039;s not your fault. See how many times I left a comment that only said &quot;awkward&quot;? This just comes from day-to-day familiarity with English, and what you really need is someone who can read the entire story through and mark all these for you, maybe even suggest changes to make them sound more natural. This is the biggest issue with the story, and it would only take a regular reader or a proofreader to handle that for you. It&#039;s a well-written story, and I&#039;d like to see it on the blog, but the sheer number of these awkward phrasings kept wrecking my sense of immersion.<br />

StankuCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 194

>>130268
It pleases me to see that EqD includes prereaders as thorough and dedicated as you. I myself would have stopped reading well before the end of the first chapter, had I been reading a fic with that many flaws. This brings me to the one real question I have: Where is the supposed potentiality amidst all this awkwardness? A vain question, I know, yet the answer to that would help me as much as everything else you wrote, I feel.

-Stanku<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130268" onclick="return highlight('130268', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130268">&gt;&gt;130268</a><br />It pleases me to see that EqD includes prereaders as thorough and dedicated as you. I myself would have stopped reading well before the end of the first chapter, had I been reading a fic with that many flaws. This brings me to the one real question I have: Where is the supposed potentiality amidst all this awkwardness? A vain question, I know, yet the answer to that would help me as much as everything else you wrote, I feel. <br /><br />-Stanku<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 195

>>130274
The story itself is an engaging one. If someone can overlook awkward turns of phrase and just read through them, they'd be rewarded with an engaging story. Unfortunately, my inner editor won't let me read like that. And the point about a lot of the OCs coming across as identical only occurred to me in hindsight.

It's just the little intricacies of language that made this not sit quite right for me, and someone who has the time to help you rephrase things would make great strides here.

I'm not so concerned with the total number of items I listed, because these were pretty long chapters. I should find more. I look more at the rate that problems occur more than counting them, and you're not doing bad on that score.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130274" onclick="return highlight('130274', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130274">&gt;&gt;130274</a><br />The story itself is an engaging one. If someone can overlook awkward turns of phrase and just read through them, they&#039;d be rewarded with an engaging story. Unfortunately, my inner editor won&#039;t let me read like that. And the point about a lot of the OCs coming across as identical only occurred to me in hindsight.<br /><br />It&#039;s just the little intricacies of language that made this not sit quite right for me, and someone who has the time to help you rephrase things would make great strides here.<br /><br />I&#039;m not so concerned with the total number of items I listed, because these were pretty long chapters. I <i>should</i> find more. I look more at the rate that problems occur more than counting them, and you&#039;re not doing bad on that score.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 196

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Okay, I'll point out some specific examples this time.

>“No! Luna, don’t do this! There will be dire consequences!” Cried out a desperate Twilight Sparkle, clutching her broken front hoof.//

There's a section at the top of this thread on dialogue punctuation and capitalization. In short, "cried" shouldn't be capitalized.

>The Princess of the Night did nothing but laugh at the broken unicorn, “What couldst thou do?//

When you transition from narration to quote or vice versa with a comma, the narration should contain a speaking action, with a few very specific exceptions. "Laugh" is pretty iffy as a speaking action. You can laugh while you speak, but you don't really laugh words.

>Celestia has//

In your use of archaic speech here, this should be "Celestia hath."

>she looked around over to her fallen friends//

Which is it? Over or around? They just sound odd together like this.

>Princess Luna looked curtly at the purple Element of Magic, her frown turning into a smirk, “She hath finally crossed the line.//

Another example. None of that attribution has a speaking action. You need to put one in there or make that part a separate sentence. You do this a lot.

>And then thy precious sun rose from the ashes and it brought forth light unto Equestria.//

You have two separate clauses here, which usually requires putting a comma between them. There's a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>She laughed mockingly, but her expression changed from one of triumph to one of sadness upon looking at the anger on Twilight’s face//

Look how many emotions you're directly informing me of here. It's better to get me to deduce how they feel from what they say, do, and look like. If I was standing there, what would I observe about these characters that might get me to infer these emotions from them? There's a discussion on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Art we//

Are we

>thou would//

wouldst

>for thou//

for thee

>Even her voice changed, Becoming//

Capitalization

>Tomorrow dawns//

dawneth

>the night time has//

nighttime hath

>lokked//

Typo

>“Sunset, what the buck have you done?!” The shocked Night Guard yelled at me, his jaw hung in disbelief.//

Another capitalization problem, and the comma is a splice.

>school mare//

This would be one word, as in "schoolgirl."

>It’s been ten years since Nightmare Moon took over//

See, this completely takes away the need for your "10 years later…" at the beginning of the scene, and it's much more elegant about establishing the time frame.

>and it worried me greatly//

Better to show this through her actions and demeanor than outright stating. Another instance of show versus tell.

>“Oh, I wonder who it is,” I said in a sing-song voice, turning my head around, “Could it be the peculiar pony I see around a lot?//

The way you have this punctuated, the two parts of the quote would have to join into a single sentence. For one, they can't, and for another, you seem to recognize it in some way, since you capitalized both.

>knocking me to the ground as quick as lightning as she stood over me with her wings unfurled//

Note that "as" clauses mean simultaneous action. But she'd have to knock Summer over before she could stand over her.

>high profile//

Hyphenate your compound descriptors.

>All of a sudden//

An example of repetition. You just used this phrase not long ago.

>her majesty//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>Canterlot Castle’s right wing//

Wings are generally identified by direction, as "right" also depends on the viewers orientation.

>not sounding very happy//

That's wierdly self-aware of her.

>brushing my mane with a hairbrush//

Another instance of repetition. There are better ways of phrasing it to avoid that.

>For a second I even thought I saw Coco Pommel//

What possible relevance does this have? If this doesn't turn out to be important later, there's no point in including it.

>I bet I could give him the time of his life-//

You have a hyphen here where you need a dash.

>princes’ smile//

This would indicate that there is more than one prince. And that they all share a single smile…

>Nightmare Moon no longer wore her traditional armor, but instead wore a necklace//

Another example of repetition (wore).

>I recognized her immediately as Apple Bloom.//

And only a paragraph later…
>I immediately recognized her as Sweetie Belle.//

So, I'll stop here. I've pointed out at least one example of each issue I brought up last time.

Another pre-reader looked it over as well, and since pacing is one of the things I'm not so good at catching, I'll include The Carousel Pony's feedback:

"It feels very rushed in spots. The main place it stood out to me was how Sparkler was very remote and aloof and then suddenly became more normal and approachable in a very short span of time. As well Blueblood does something similar. He seems to warm up to Sunset exceptionally fast and it isn't really explained why. Both of them start as rather distant from Sunset and then suddenly become more friendly which seemed odd as there was no explanation for why there were being standoffish in the first place. I would suggest either keeping them aloof and slowly allowing them to warm to her or simply have them be more approachable from the start.

The time frame also felt very difficult to grasp. I wasn't certain when exactly Luna had reverted to NMM and why, so it was difficult to mentally place the characters.

I also felt your scenes could have used more descriptions as it often felt like talking heads just floating in space with no body language to help flesh them out. Even a sentence or two about how the characters are interacting with the scenery."Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Okay, I&#039;ll point out some specific examples this time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“No! Luna, don’t do this! There will be dire consequences!” Cried out a desperate Twilight Sparkle, clutching her broken front hoof.//</span><br />There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread on dialogue punctuation and capitalization. In short, &quot;cried&quot; shouldn&#039;t be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Princess of the Night did nothing but laugh at the broken unicorn, “What couldst thou do?//</span><br />When you transition from narration to quote or vice versa with a comma, the narration should contain a speaking action, with a few very specific exceptions. &quot;Laugh&quot; is pretty iffy as a speaking action. You can laugh while you speak, but you don&#039;t really laugh words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia has//</span><br />In your use of archaic speech here, this should be &quot;Celestia hath.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she looked around over to her fallen friends//</span><br />Which is it? Over or around? They just sound odd together like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Luna looked curtly at the purple Element of Magic, her frown turning into a smirk, “She hath finally crossed the line.//</span><br />Another example. None of that attribution has a speaking action. You need to put one in there or make that part a separate sentence. You do this a <i>lot</i>.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And then thy precious sun rose from the ashes and it brought forth light unto Equestria.//</span><br />You have two separate clauses here, which usually requires putting a comma between them. There&#039;s a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She laughed mockingly, but her expression changed from one of triumph to one of sadness upon looking at the anger on Twilight’s face//</span><br />Look how many emotions you&#039;re directly informing me of here. It&#039;s better to get me to deduce how they feel from what they say, do, and look like. If I was standing there, what would I observe about these characters that might get me to infer these emotions from them? There&#039;s a discussion on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Art we//</span><br />Are we<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thou would//</span><br />wouldst<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for thou//</span><br />for thee<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even her voice changed, Becoming//</span><br />Capitalization<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tomorrow dawns//</span><br />dawneth<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the night time has//</span><br />nighttime hath<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lokked//</span><br />Typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Sunset, what the buck have you done?!” The shocked Night Guard yelled at me, his jaw hung in disbelief.//</span><br />Another capitalization problem, and the comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;school mare//</span><br />This would be one word, as in &quot;schoolgirl.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s been ten years since Nightmare Moon took over//</span><br />See, this completely takes away the need for your &quot;10 years later…&quot; at the beginning of the scene, and it&#039;s much more elegant about establishing the time frame.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and it worried me greatly//</span><br />Better to show this through her actions and demeanor than outright stating. Another instance of show versus tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh, I wonder who it is,” I said in a sing-song voice, turning my head around, “Could it be the peculiar pony I see around a lot?//</span><br />The way you have this punctuated, the two parts of the quote would have to join into a single sentence. For one, they can&#039;t, and for another, you seem to recognize it in some way, since you capitalized both.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knocking me to the ground as quick as lightning as she stood over me with her wings unfurled//</span><br />Note that &quot;as&quot; clauses mean simultaneous action. But she&#039;d have to knock Summer over <i>before</i> she could stand over her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high profile//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All of a sudden//</span><br />An example of repetition. You just used this phrase not long ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her majesty//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlot Castle’s right wing//</span><br />Wings are generally identified by direction, as &quot;right&quot; also depends on the viewers orientation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not sounding very happy//</span><br />That&#039;s wierdly self-aware of her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brushing my mane with a hairbrush//</span><br />Another instance of repetition. There are better ways of phrasing it to avoid that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For a second I even thought I saw Coco Pommel//</span><br />What possible relevance does this have? If this doesn&#039;t turn out to be important later, there&#039;s no point in including it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I bet I could give him the time of his life-//</span><br />You have a hyphen here where you need a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princes’ smile//</span><br />This would indicate that there is more than one prince. And that they all share a single smile…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nightmare Moon no longer wore her traditional armor, but instead wore a necklace//</span><br />Another example of repetition (wore).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I recognized her immediately as Apple Bloom.//</span><br />And only a paragraph later…<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I immediately recognized her as Sweetie Belle.//</span><br /><br />So, I&#039;ll stop here. I&#039;ve pointed out at least one example of each issue I brought up last time.<br /><br />Another pre-reader looked it over as well, and since pacing is one of the things I&#039;m not so good at catching, I&#039;ll include The Carousel Pony&#039;s feedback:<br /><br />&quot;It feels very rushed in spots. The main place it stood out to me was how Sparkler was very remote and aloof and then suddenly became more normal and approachable in a very short span of time. As well Blueblood does something similar. He seems to warm up to Sunset exceptionally fast and it isn&#039;t really explained why. Both of them start as rather distant from Sunset and then suddenly become more friendly which seemed odd as there was no explanation for why there were being standoffish in the first place. I would suggest either keeping them aloof and slowly allowing them to warm to her or simply have them be more approachable from the start.<br /><br />The time frame also felt very difficult to grasp. I wasn&#039;t certain when exactly Luna had reverted to NMM and why, so it was difficult to mentally place the characters. <br /><br />I also felt your scenes could have used more descriptions as it often felt like talking heads just floating in space with no body language to help flesh them out. Even a sentence or two about how the characters are interacting with the scenery.&quot;<br />

StankuCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 197

>>130284
Okay. Thanks for all the helpful comments. I shall make sure that the flaws and awkwards phrases you pointed out will be fixed, and that the rest of the chapters will not repeat them. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130284" onclick="return highlight('130284', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130284">&gt;&gt;130284</a><br />Okay. Thanks for all the helpful comments. I shall make sure that the flaws and awkwards phrases you pointed out will be fixed, and that the rest of the chapters will not repeat them.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 198

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>When paying for damages incurred by her clumsiness leaves her unable to pay for her daughter's birthday present//

Try to avoid word repetition in a close space like your two instances of "pay" here. For instance, you could replace "pay for" with "afford" without losing any meaning.

The only other issue I have with the synopsis is the large number of "to be" verbs. You have five of them in five sentences. They can't practically be avoided altogether, but it's a good idea to minimize them. They're inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You should be choosing more active verbs. It's also a good idea to avoid have the narrator use "you," unless you're going to establish one who will regularly talk to the reader. You could reword the "you" and "yourself" here with "she" and "herself," and I don't think it would hurt anything particularly since it would seem to fit with the following sentence better.

>tomorrow!//

You'll normally italicize ! or ? when they're on an italicized word. You did so earlier.

>Honestly, sometimes it seemed like she had springs in her hooves.//

This is in a pretty tight perspective. Compare to:
>They always did that when she was stressed or preoccupied.//
The latter is an oddly self-aware thing for her to say, so it comes across as a more omniscient statement. Try to keep a consistent perspective.

>How did it get here so soon? she wondered.

This is the same. The remark about springs in her hooves was essentially one of her thoughts that the narrator presented on her behalf. But here, you have her present it. If you're going to do both, the only reason to differentiate is if it's really important for some reason that a quoted thought be very literal, that the reader understands she thought it exactly that way, word for word. I don't see that here. I think it's something you could be more consistent about.

>Hearth’s Warming was a special time of year but it didn’t compare with the importance of a birthday to a young filly.//

There are a few times that breaking this rule can help with flow (that's why I didn't point out the second sentence in this paragraph), but you need a comma between the clauses here. There's a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. that'll explain, if you're unfamiliar with the rule.

>Rather than let her mother put them on, there were dents in the straps where she had tugged the strap tight with her own teeth.//

This is phrased oddly. "Rather than let her mother put them on" describes Dinky, but you go on to describe the dents and straps before getting to her.

>fitted//

In this usage of the word, "fit" is the proper past tense.

>played out their practised lines//

You just used "practised" a few sentences ago, and it' the third instance in the story already. Watch the repetition.

>Derpy may not always get it right when it was her turn on weather duty but she would defy any of the professional weather ponies//

Another spot where you need a comma between clauses.

>“You said it. Tell her happy birthday from me if I don’t see you tomorrow.”//

There's a section at the top of this thread on talking heads. You haven't gone on too long here, but it'd help get the mood across with a few character actions in there.

>a small brown envelope was placed with what they had earned ready for them to collect.//

That's a bit oddly phrased, too. Maybe just a comma after "earned" would do the trick.

>gratefully//

This would carry a lot more weight if you got me to deduce this from her behavior instead of telling me outright.

>and never asked for more than she knew Derpy was able to give//

That's kind of an odd dynamic that Dinky has a sense of what Derpy can afford. Kids rarely know how much their parents make or even have a concept of how much money that is anyway.

>Even when they had to each rehydrated alfalfa//

Typo.

>No, there had to be a mistake.//

Here's another example of where you're having the narrator present her thoughts as his own. This is fine, but be consistent about it. Personally, I find this type of perspective more engaging for emotional pieces.

>and when she had them matching again//

This dependent clause needs commas on both ends.

>though her expression made Derpy suspicious//

Let me see it, too. It'll have a lot more impact if I'm interpreting it than if it's a cold fact.

>What have they shorted me by so much?//

Seems like you meant to say "why".

>Derpy’s voice grew shrill with emotion.//

It's bad enough when you tell me bluntly what emotion she's feeling, but when you couple that with being vague… There's a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread that'll explain.

>Coryphée looked deeply uncomfortable.//

Yes, but let me see it.

>B-But//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

>Derpy remembered a let sitting in her pigeonhole//

Typo and missing a comma.

>Coryphée clearly wished she was anywhere but there.//

This feels pretty repetitive with the earlier:
>obviously wishing Derpy would spontaneously vanish in the next ten seconds//

>She trailed off//

Trailing off or interrupting are things so obviously pointed out by the choice of punctuation that you don't need to point them out again in the narration.

>repeating herself to make sure her mother was paying the proper amount of attention.//

This smacks of being from Dinky's perspective, whereas you've held to Derpy's so far.

>desperation giving rise to a desperate idea in her mind//

It's possible you used this repetition on purpose.

>I don’t like going downstairs for dinner so I eat up in my room//

Needs a comma.

>Wasn’t that why she had put them away in the first place; because seeing them and knowing he would never use them again hurt too much?//

Not really a correct use of a semicolon, since there isn't an independent clause after it. You're defining or clarifying the reason, though, so a colon would work.

>deftness//

You just used that one recently, too. The more unusual a word, the more space you have to give it before using it again, unless you do something to make sure the repetition is intentional for emphasis or some thematic reason.

>Her hooves developed blisters//

I don't get how. Hooves are basically like giant fingernails. You don't get blisters on nails…

>This was a terribly idea//

Typo.

>She could mimic that optimism these days but that was all it was//

Comma needed.

>When she met something hard//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>using her open mouth as a wind sock//

Since the purpose of a wind sock is to indicate the wind's direction, I'm not seeing the comparison here. You're not equating their appearance, but their function.

>Sparkle//

Is this just a typo? Dinky hasn't been calling her by a nickname.

>yacky//

British term or typo? I haven't heard this one before.

>It was plain white with no distinguishing markings or logos; no hint at what it contained.//

Again, you have no independent clause after the semicolon. A dash would work here.

>suspicion that morphed into a fresh wave of shock//

Let me see it!

>N-No//

Capitalization.

>half collapsed//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>“Oh!” Dinky’s mouth formed a small ‘o’//

Feels kind of redundant.

The only few things that seemed to be consistent problems were comma for dependent clauses and misused semicolons, as far as mechanics go, and even then, they weren't flooding me.

I would like to point out the number of times I caught you being telly or told you I wanted to see the emotion you were describing. This is really the way to engage the reader for a piece with emotional content. It's definitely worth a sweep to root that out. And keep an eye on your character perspective.

Finally, I already explained the rationale behind limiting "to be" verbs. You use a lot of them. For the easier forms to search on, I counted 124. That's almost exactly one every 40 words, or about one every 2 1/2 sentences. That's how often something isn't happening. Take a crack at rephrasing a number of these with active verbs.

This is a nice story, and I'd like to see it on the blog. I've read your work before, and I know you're capable of fixing this up. Invest a little more time into it so we can post it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When paying for damages incurred by her clumsiness leaves her unable to pay for her daughter&#039;s birthday present//</span><br />Try to avoid word repetition in a close space like your two instances of &quot;pay&quot; here. For instance, you could replace &quot;pay for&quot; with &quot;afford&quot; without losing any meaning.<br /><br />The only other issue I have with the synopsis is the large number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You have five of them in five sentences. They can&#039;t practically be avoided altogether, but it&#039;s a good idea to minimize them. They&#039;re inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You should be choosing more active verbs. It&#039;s also a good idea to avoid have the narrator use &quot;you,&quot; unless you&#039;re going to establish one who will regularly talk to the reader. You could reword the &quot;you&quot; and &quot;yourself&quot; here with &quot;she&quot; and &quot;herself,&quot; and I don&#039;t think it would hurt anything particularly since it would seem to fit with the following sentence better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>tomorrow</i>!//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally italicize ! or ? when they&#039;re on an italicized word. You did so earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Honestly, sometimes it seemed like she had springs in her hooves.//</span><br />This is in a pretty tight perspective. Compare to:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They always did that when she was stressed or preoccupied.//</span><br />The latter is an oddly self-aware thing for her to say, so it comes across as a more omniscient statement. Try to keep a consistent perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>How did it get here so soon?</i> she wondered.</span><br />This is the same. The remark about springs in her hooves was essentially one of her thoughts that the narrator presented on her behalf. But here, you have her present it. If you&#039;re going to do both, the only reason to differentiate is if it&#039;s really important for some reason that a quoted thought be very literal, that the reader understands she thought it exactly that way, word for word. I don&#039;t see that here. I think it&#039;s something you could be more consistent about.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearth’s Warming was a special time of year but it didn’t compare with the importance of a birthday to a young filly.//</span><br />There are a few times that breaking this rule can help with flow (that&#039;s why I didn&#039;t point out the second sentence in this paragraph), but you need a comma between the clauses here. There&#039;s a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. that&#039;ll explain, if you&#039;re unfamiliar with the rule.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rather than let her mother put them on, there were dents in the straps where she had tugged the strap tight with her own teeth.//</span><br />This is phrased oddly. &quot;Rather than let her mother put them on&quot; describes Dinky, but you go on to describe the dents and straps before getting to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fitted//</span><br />In this usage of the word, &quot;fit&quot; is the proper past tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;played out their practised lines//</span><br />You just used &quot;practised&quot; a few sentences ago, and it&#039; the third instance in the story already. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Derpy may not always get it right when it was her turn on weather duty but she would defy any of the professional weather ponies//</span><br />Another spot where you need a comma between clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You said it. Tell her happy birthday from me if I don’t see you tomorrow.”//</span><br />There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread on talking heads. You haven&#039;t gone on too long here, but it&#039;d help get the mood across with a few character actions in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a small brown envelope was placed with what they had earned ready for them to collect.//</span><br />That&#039;s a bit oddly phrased, too. Maybe just a comma after &quot;earned&quot; would do the trick.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gratefully//</span><br />This would carry a lot more weight if you got me to deduce this from her behavior instead of telling me outright.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and never asked for more than she knew Derpy was able to give//</span><br />That&#039;s kind of an odd dynamic that Dinky has a sense of what Derpy can afford. Kids rarely know how much their parents make or even have a concept of how much money that is anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even when they had to each rehydrated alfalfa//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No, there had to be a mistake.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another example of where you&#039;re having the narrator present her thoughts as his own. This is fine, but be consistent about it. Personally, I find this type of perspective more engaging for emotional pieces.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when she had them matching again//</span><br />This dependent clause needs commas on both ends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;though her expression made Derpy suspicious//</span><br />Let me see it, too. It&#039;ll have a lot more impact if I&#039;m interpreting it than if it&#039;s a cold fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What have they shorted me by so much?//</span><br />Seems like you meant to say &quot;why&quot;.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Derpy’s voice grew shrill with emotion.//</span><br />It&#039;s bad enough when you tell me bluntly what emotion she&#039;s feeling, but when you couple that with being vague… There&#039;s a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread that&#039;ll explain.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coryphée looked deeply uncomfortable.//</span><br />Yes, but let me <i>see</i> it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;B-But//</span><br />Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Derpy remembered a let sitting in her pigeonhole//</span><br />Typo and missing a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coryphée clearly wished she was anywhere but there.//</span><br />This feels pretty repetitive with the earlier:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;obviously wishing Derpy would spontaneously vanish in the next ten seconds//</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trailed off//</span><br />Trailing off or interrupting are things so obviously pointed out by the choice of punctuation that you don&#039;t need to point them out again in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;repeating herself to make sure her mother was paying the proper amount of attention.//</span><br />This smacks of being from Dinky&#039;s perspective, whereas you&#039;ve held to Derpy&#039;s so far.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;desperation giving rise to a desperate idea in her mind//</span><br />It&#039;s possible you used this repetition on purpose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t like going downstairs for dinner so I eat up in my room//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wasn’t that why she had put them away in the first place; because seeing them and knowing he would never use them again hurt too much?//</span><br />Not really a correct use of a semicolon, since there isn&#039;t an independent clause after it. You&#039;re defining or clarifying the reason, though, so a colon would work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;deftness//</span><br />You just used that one recently, too. The more unusual a word, the more space you have to give it before using it again, unless you do something to make sure the repetition is intentional for emphasis or some thematic reason.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her hooves developed blisters//</span><br />I don&#039;t get how. Hooves are basically like giant fingernails. You don&#039;t get blisters on nails…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This was a terribly idea//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could mimic that optimism these days but that was all it was//</span><br />Comma needed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When she met something hard//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;using her open mouth as a wind sock//</span><br />Since the purpose of a wind sock is to indicate the wind&#039;s direction, I&#039;m not seeing the comparison here. You&#039;re not equating their appearance, but their function.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sparkle//</span><br />Is this just a typo? Dinky hasn&#039;t been calling her by a nickname.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yacky//</span><br />British term or typo? I haven&#039;t heard this one before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was plain white with no distinguishing markings or logos; no hint at what it contained.//</span><br />Again, you have no independent clause after the semicolon. A dash would work here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;suspicion that morphed into a fresh wave of shock//</span><br />Let me see it!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;N-No//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half collapsed//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh!” Dinky’s mouth formed a small ‘o’//</span><br />Feels kind of redundant.<br /><br />The only few things that seemed to be consistent problems were comma for dependent clauses and misused semicolons, as far as mechanics go, and even then, they weren&#039;t flooding me.<br /><br />I would like to point out the number of times I caught you being telly or told you I wanted to see the emotion you were describing. This is really the way to engage the reader for a piece with emotional content. It&#039;s definitely worth a sweep to root that out. And keep an eye on your character perspective.<br /><br />Finally, I already explained the rationale behind limiting &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You use a lot of them. For the easier forms to search on, I counted 124. That&#039;s almost exactly one every 40 words, or about one every 2 1/2 sentences. That&#039;s how often something <i>isn&#039;t</i> happening. Take a crack at rephrasing a number of these with active verbs.<br /><br />This is a nice story, and I&#039;d like to see it on the blog. I&#039;ve read your work before, and I know you&#039;re capable of fixing this up. Invest a little more time into it so we can post it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 199

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>were hanging//

Why the switch to past tense?

>dainty-looking//

This is begging for qualification. I can't really imagine what might make a nail dainty. Maybe you just mean they're small, or colored, or ornate. Give me more of a mental picture of what you mean.

>hundred— a//

Since it looks like you're going with em dashes, don't put a space on either side of it. For en dashes, you'd put a space on both sides. Don't put a space on just one side for either type.

>(these are the ones she could agree to part with)//

It's unusual to see parenthetical elements in narration outside of a first-person narrator.

>the way always he sits//

Seems you got a couple of words out of order.

>Carrot Top is embarrassed again that she hadn’t inherited any of her mother's beautiful singing voice.//

This would gain a lot of power if the narrator weren't simply informing me of it. If I saw a bit of her behavior when the memory arises or a half-sentence fleeting anecdote about when she used to listen to her mother sing, it'd really form a connection.

>newly-wed//

newlywed

>Carrot Top sighs at the abrupt ending of her dream.//

This comes across as a tad heavy-handed. We already know from the way the previous scene concluded that it was a dream.

>just the sky just barely//

You're on the edge here. I'm guessing the word repetition wasn't intentional here. If you wanted it to be a thematic repetition, it needs to be a bit more obvious, like using it a third or fourth time, but I suspect it's merely an oversight.

>tissue in cold water//

Not sure why you're making the distinction. Tissue doesn't break up any faster in cold water than any other temperature.

>the room across the bedroom//

That's an odd phrasing, because something across the room is still in the room, but you can't have a room in a room. Not sure whether you meant "across from" (it's on the other side of the hallway) or something closer to "on the opposite side of."

>instead of being neatly stacked under the footboard of her damnably large bed, collecting dust and cobwebs//

I think you're okay here, but descriptive elements like to modify objects near to them, so grammatically speaking, the "collecting…" participle would tend to describe the bed. As in this case, it's often easy to figure out what you meant, but if you don't keep a eye on these types of misplaced modifiers, you might use one that's genuinely ambiguous or misleading.

>sleeping in the room across hers//

Ah, so I get what sense you meant this. I've always seen it phrased "across from." As you have it, it would tend to mean they're in the same room as hers, but at the other end of it.

>half-heartedly//

halfheartedly

>considered//

Another shift to a past-tense verb.

>What is snug and cozy for a married couple, is uncomfortably inadequate for two mares and a foal.//

That comma is unnecessary.

>It had managed//

This tense is out of place in a present-tense narration. It would describe something that happened in the past, but has since stopped, and I don't think that's the case here. Simple past should be fine.

>Bits were always short and as quickly needed as they accumulated. Dinky wasn't a baby anymore, and she needed her own room and desk and books.//

Watch the repetition of "needed."

>Dinky was a smart foal//

Another odd tense. Given the prevailing present tense, it sounds like Dinky isn't smart anymore.

>these kind of things//

Number mismatch. It's either "this kind of thing" or "these kinds of things."

>Carrot had seen//

Again, I think simple past tense would work better here. Past perfect is generally used for an action that is in the story's past when it uses past-tense narration. It has that sense of completion to it, so it implies that Carrot Top doesn't see this anymore.

>Ditzy//

If you're attached to this name, that's fine. I actually like it better, but canon basically said they're different ponies, though they've backed off from having an official name for her.

>“You've already done so much for us, Carrot,” she said, holding the older mare, “You don't owe anything to anypony."//

The way you've punctuated that, both parts of the quote would form a single sentence, but it'd be a comma splice in that case, and you'd have to use lower case to start the second part. In short, change the comma after "mare" to a period. There's a section at the top of this thread explaining the most common ways to capitalize and punctuate quotations.

>In her firmest voice//

Watch your perspective. The story's been from Carrot Top's point of view, but this statement is from Ditzy's (how would Carrot Top know it was her firmest voice?). If Carrot Top can perceive something that leads her to this conclusion, then show me the same evidence instead of giving me the conclusion itself.

>They came to a decision that night.//

And your tense is wavering in this scene. It's jumping back and forth between present and past. In that your narrator is summing up things that happen, particularly at the end of the scene, it may be better to cast the entire scene in past tense, but whatever you do, try to keep it consistent. There are stories that can get away with shifting tenses, but it just feels jarring here.

>a plates//

Typo.

>“Breakfast time, lamby. Say thank you,” Auntie Carrot Top.//

Looks like you meant to put those quotation marks at the end of the sentence.

>to get rid of the fuzzy, sleepy taste that had settled in//

Perspective again. This is firmly in Dinky's head. Nobody else could know this.

>shrunk away from the light, condensing and sharpening until they hugged//

Tense again. Seems like "shrink" and "hug" would work better here.

>Carrot notices that Ditzy takes two sugars with her coffee that day.//

Muddled tenses again. "Notices" implies present tense, but "that day" as opposed to "this day" or "today" implies past.

>But its actually not all that bad//

Its/it's confusion.

>Carrot Top remembers that Hearts and Hooves day is this week.//

This feels like an awfully bland statement of fact for what could possibly involve surprise, regret, worry… I'll talk about this more in my wrap-up comments, but I want to see that reaction.

>With that, Carrot Top could help but think about the first time she met the mailmare.//

A couple of things here. First, phrases like "with that" in which the narration directly references itself are pretty immersion-breaking. I bet you can come up with a better intro than that. Second, it's an odd tense thing again. "Can't" would be more appropriate than "could."

>To be honest, Carrot Top found it a little odd how a filly could talk about anything from Canterlot politics to the weather in Baltimare with the same passionate sincerity.//

I'm going to flag this for now but discuss it later in the wrap-up comments. Just note how the narrator is basically stating Carrot Top's thoughts for her.

>Ever since the accident, her life has been awfully quiet, too quiet, sometimes she just wants to bury her face in the pillows on her couch//

That last comma is a splice, and since this scene is in past tense, the "has been" should really be a "had been."

>young a blue pegasus//

Got a couple of words out of order.

>with a striking rainbow mane she's never seen before//

Another odd tense shift. I'd also encourage you to phrase it as "…she'd never seen before, with a striking rainbow mane." That way, it's clear that it's the mare she'd never seen and not just the mane, as if she knew Dash, but she'd dyed her mane or something.

>There was concern weighing down Roseluck's normally jaunty voice.//

Instead of just telling me there's "concern," describe the voice in a way that I'll infer it. That connects me to the character. It's a related issue, but check out the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread to get the rationale.

>of course she knew about the accident, Carrot bet the entire damned town knew//

Comma splice.

>Roseluck clearly wasn't fooled, but she knew to drop it.//

Here's an example of a good use of perspective. The "clearly" grounds this as Carrot's perception of Roseluck's attitude, so it's keeping the point of view with Carrot.

>Poor thing though, probably doesn't know anypony; probably even moved from Cloudsdale for her foal.//

Semicolons are a formal enough thing that you really have to get them right, and you don't have an independent clause after it. I think a dash would work well.

>Carrot Top wasn't sure about how this made her feel.//

The narration after this gives me the same idea perfectly well, so stating it here so stoically is superfluous.

>light.Today//

Missing a space.

>normally weighed down by a much larger load//

This is pretty redundant with the previous "Her wagon is unfamiliarly light."

>shade cloth//

Might just want to call it an awning.

>You're welcome to first pickings if you want.”

>
>“Why, thank you!” Roseluck says, picking out//
Watch the repetitive use of "picking."

>Roseluck giggles and blushes crimson//

That's a really questionable speaking verb. I could live with giggling a couple of words, but this is used as an attribution for two long sentences.

>Carrot's voice is thin and weak by the end of the last sentence.//

In contrast, this seems like a very external perspective. Carrot Top wouldn't be self-aware enough to realize this about herself, especially given what's happening.

>Grabbing what she could, she boarded the first non-stop train to Canterlot.//

Note that participles imply simultaneous action, so she's grabbing her things from home at the same time she's boarding the train. And it's "nonstop."

>the receptionist behind a glass booth//

Well, she's behind glass. But she's not behind the booth; she's in it.

>Sir//

The only reason to capitalize this as a term of address would be if it's a title, as in a knighthood.

>Carrot Top hooves//

Missing a possessive.

>Cloud Angel//

You had properly been italicizing the ship's name, but now you've stopped.

>hiccuping//

Is that really the best word choice here? That's something else entirely.

>she began to feel a deep, terrible fear//

Right around here, you're spending an awful lot of time directly informing me of character emotions. Show me how they act and get me to deduce those emotions, and I'll care a lot more about their predicament.

>Carrot Top's mouth opened and shut soundlessly. She felt tears swelling in her eyes again. The two looked at each other for a long while, neither knowing what to say to the other.//

This is a great plot development. It contrasts nicely that Carrot found the whole place so alien, even a bit revolting, but suddenly has this common ground with him.

>mid afternoon//

mid-afternoon

>Carrot Top checks the big clock on Town Hall//

There actually isn't a clock on Ponyville's town hall, but there is one on Ponyville Tower.

>‘Scarcity like an armed bandit.’

I can't see a reason for italicizing this, since you already have it enclosed in quotes.

>trying to figure out how this explanation is different from her own//

Another perspective leap. This is in Dinky's point of view unless you qualify it as Carrot's interpretation of how Dinky looks and acts.

That last sentence… I appreciate the point you're trying to make, but it's a bit weak. I think it'd work better if you tied it more strongly to the thematic remarks you'd made all along about the house's size.

So it should be obvious what a few of the main problems are. The perspective jumps around a bit too much, and I'm not sure it needs to jump around at all. You usually have it in Carrot's point of view, so just pay attention to keeping it there. Along those lines, the few places where you put items in parentheses inside the narration seem a bit odd. Like I said, those types of things often work best in first person. But not only with who holds the perspective—you jump between a very tight focus and a distant one. At the risk of saying something you already know, an omniscient or objective narrator stand dispassionately away from the action and has no opinions about it. A limited or subjective narrator effectively takes on one of the characters' perspectives (or can shift between multiple characters, as long as the transition is handled well—I won't go into it, since it doesn't seem applicable here, but you can read the section on talking heads at the top of this thread if you're curious). This narrator can speak the character's thoughts and opinions as his own. You go back and forth between these. There are certainly statements a limited narrator will say that can sound omniscient, like when they're simple statements of fact, so that there are no feelings or opinions involved. That makes it fairly important to delve into a feeling or opinion regularly so you keep the narration subjective often enough to feel consistent. A lot of these parenthetical elements are essentially a limited narrator, and you could take them out of parentheses. That way, the narrator is just speaking on Carrot's behalf, and it forges a closer link between her and the reader. You might want to consider doing so and adding in even more to keep that feel up throughout the story. Or if you'd rather back off to a more objective narrator, again, keep that consistent throughout the story, then if you want to express Carrot's opinions and thoughts, do so as quoted thoughts instead of narration. Either way works; the point is consistency.

Next, the verb tenses go all over the place. I get the sense that you're not a native English speaker; I apologize if I'm wrong about that (your use of German would seem to give me a clue as to your nationality—I took four years of German in school and halfway expected the proverb Carrot alluded to would be a good German one. I was not disappointed, though I thought it would be "Arbeit macht das Leben süß.") I have not dismissed the possibility that these tense changes were intentional, but I couldn't find a reason or pattern, so if they were, please tell me so that I can take another look and see if it accomplishes what you want it to. I'm talking more about changes from one sentence to the next; having a scene in a different tense that the one before it isn't as big a deal, and I could tell in general when you did that.

Next is the sheer number of "to be" verbs. Well, I had the impression that there were a lot, but it's important to verify that after the fact, and of the easier forms to search on, I counted 141. That's about one every three sentences, which isn't awful. So it's not so much the raw number, but more that I noticed plenty of times where you could have easily rephrased using a more active verb. "To be" is a very boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is, so consider trying to reduce them some.

Last issue, and this is more a suggestion. I was hoping to see you make more of this interaction with the griffon officer after the fact. I already told you why I thought it was a powerful moment, and I think it's a wonderful point for the story to make, if you care to have Carrot Top reflect on it at all, on the shallow end, or perhaps even strike up a friendship with him, on the deeper end.

In summary, please fix this story up, because I thought it was a wonderful sentiment, and I'd like to see it go up on the blog.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;were hanging//</span><br />Why the switch to past tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dainty-looking//</span><br />This is begging for qualification. I can&#039;t really imagine what might make a nail dainty. Maybe you just mean they&#039;re small, or colored, or ornate. Give me more of a mental picture of what you mean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hundred— a//</span><br />Since it looks like you&#039;re going with em dashes, don&#039;t put a space on either side of it. For en dashes, you&#039;d put a space on both sides. Don&#039;t put a space on just one side for either type.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(these are the ones she could agree to part with)//</span><br />It&#039;s unusual to see parenthetical elements in narration outside of a first-person narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the way always he sits//</span><br />Seems you got a couple of words out of order.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top is embarrassed again that she hadn’t inherited any of her mother&#039;s beautiful singing voice.//</span><br />This would gain a lot of power if the narrator weren&#039;t simply informing me of it. If I saw a bit of her behavior when the memory arises or a half-sentence fleeting anecdote about when she used to listen to her mother sing, it&#039;d really form a connection.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;newly-wed//</span><br />newlywed<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top sighs at the abrupt ending of her dream.//</span><br />This comes across as a tad heavy-handed. We already know from the way the previous scene concluded that it was a dream.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just the sky just barely//</span><br />You&#039;re on the edge here. I&#039;m guessing the word repetition wasn&#039;t intentional here. If you wanted it to be a thematic repetition, it needs to be a bit more obvious, like using it a third or fourth time, but I suspect it&#039;s merely an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tissue in cold water//</span><br />Not sure why you&#039;re making the distinction. Tissue doesn&#039;t break up any faster in cold water than any other temperature.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the room across the bedroom//</span><br />That&#039;s an odd phrasing, because something across the room is still in the room, but you can&#039;t have a room in a room. Not sure whether you meant &quot;across from&quot; (it&#039;s on the other side of the hallway) or something closer to &quot;on the opposite side of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;instead of being neatly stacked under the footboard of her damnably large bed, collecting dust and cobwebs//</span><br />I think you&#039;re okay here, but descriptive elements like to modify objects near to them, so grammatically speaking, the &quot;collecting…&quot; participle would tend to describe the bed. As in this case, it&#039;s often easy to figure out what you meant, but if you don&#039;t keep a eye on these types of misplaced modifiers, you might use one that&#039;s genuinely ambiguous or misleading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sleeping in the room across hers//</span><br />Ah, so I get what sense you meant this. I&#039;ve always seen it phrased &quot;across from.&quot; As you have it, it would tend to mean they&#039;re in the same room as hers, but at the other end of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half-heartedly//</span><br />halfheartedly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;considered//</span><br />Another shift to a past-tense verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What is snug and cozy for a married couple, is uncomfortably inadequate for two mares and a foal.//</span><br />That comma is unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It had managed//</span><br />This tense is out of place in a present-tense narration. It would describe something that happened in the past, but has since stopped, and I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the case here. Simple past should be fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bits were always short and as quickly needed as they accumulated. Dinky wasn&#039;t a baby anymore, and she needed her own room and desk and books.//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;needed.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dinky was a smart foal//</span><br />Another odd tense. Given the prevailing present tense, it sounds like Dinky isn&#039;t smart anymore.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;these kind of things//</span><br />Number mismatch. It&#039;s either &quot;this kind of thing&quot; or &quot;these kinds of things.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot had seen//</span><br />Again, I think simple past tense would work better here. Past perfect is generally used for an action that is in the story&#039;s past when it uses past-tense narration. It has that sense of completion to it, so it implies that Carrot Top doesn&#039;t see this anymore.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ditzy//</span><br />If you&#039;re attached to this name, that&#039;s fine. I actually like it better, but canon basically said they&#039;re different ponies, though they&#039;ve backed off from having an official name for her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You&#039;ve already done so much for us, Carrot,” she said, holding the older mare, “You don&#039;t owe anything to anypony.&quot;//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve punctuated that, both parts of the quote would form a single sentence, but it&#039;d be a comma splice in that case, and you&#039;d have to use lower case to start the second part. In short, change the comma after &quot;mare&quot; to a period. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread explaining the most common ways to capitalize and punctuate quotations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In her firmest voice//</span><br />Watch your perspective. The story&#039;s been from Carrot Top&#039;s point of view, but this statement is from Ditzy&#039;s (how would Carrot Top know it was her firmest voice?). If Carrot Top can perceive something that leads her to this conclusion, then show me the same evidence instead of giving me the conclusion itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They came to a decision that night.//</span><br />And your tense is wavering in this scene. It&#039;s jumping back and forth between present and past. In that your narrator is summing up things that happen, particularly at the end of the scene, it may be better to cast the entire scene in past tense, but whatever you do, try to keep it consistent. There are stories that can get away with shifting tenses, but it just feels jarring here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a plates//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Breakfast time, lamby. Say thank you,” Auntie Carrot Top.//</span><br />Looks like you meant to put those quotation marks at the end of the sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to get rid of the fuzzy, sleepy taste that had settled in//</span><br />Perspective again. This is firmly in Dinky&#039;s head. Nobody else could know this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shrunk away from the light, condensing and sharpening until they hugged//</span><br />Tense again. Seems like &quot;shrink&quot; and &quot;hug&quot; would work better here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot notices that Ditzy takes two sugars with her coffee that day.//</span><br />Muddled tenses again. &quot;Notices&quot; implies present tense, but &quot;that day&quot; as opposed to &quot;this day&quot; or &quot;today&quot; implies past.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But its actually not all that bad//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top remembers that Hearts and Hooves day is this week.//</span><br />This feels like an awfully bland statement of fact for what could possibly involve surprise, regret, worry… I&#039;ll talk about this more in my wrap-up comments, but I want to see that reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that, Carrot Top could help but think about the first time she met the mailmare.//</span><br />A couple of things here. First, phrases like &quot;with that&quot; in which the narration directly references itself are pretty immersion-breaking. I bet you can come up with a better intro than that. Second, it&#039;s an odd tense thing again. &quot;Can&#039;t&quot; would be more appropriate than &quot;could.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To be honest, Carrot Top found it a little odd how a filly could talk about anything from Canterlot politics to the weather in Baltimare with the same passionate sincerity.//</span><br />I&#039;m going to flag this for now but discuss it later in the wrap-up comments. Just note how the narrator is basically stating Carrot Top&#039;s thoughts for her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ever since the accident, her life has been awfully quiet, too quiet, sometimes she just wants to bury her face in the pillows on her couch//</span><br />That last comma is a splice, and since this scene is in past tense, the &quot;has been&quot; should really be a &quot;had been.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;young a blue pegasus//</span><br />Got a couple of words out of order.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a striking rainbow mane she&#039;s never seen before//</span><br />Another odd tense shift. I&#039;d also encourage you to phrase it as &quot;…she&#039;d never seen before, with a striking rainbow mane.&quot; That way, it&#039;s clear that it&#039;s the mare she&#039;d never seen and not just the mane, as if she knew Dash, but she&#039;d dyed her mane or something.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was concern weighing down Roseluck&#039;s normally jaunty voice.//</span><br />Instead of just telling me there&#039;s &quot;concern,&quot; describe the voice in a way that I&#039;ll infer it. That connects me to the character. It&#039;s a related issue, but check out the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread to get the rationale.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of course she knew about the accident, Carrot bet the entire damned town knew//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Roseluck clearly wasn&#039;t fooled, but she knew to drop it.//</span><br />Here&#039;s an example of a good use of perspective. The &quot;clearly&quot; grounds this as Carrot&#039;s perception of Roseluck&#039;s attitude, so it&#039;s keeping the point of view with Carrot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Poor thing though, probably doesn&#039;t know anypony; probably even moved from Cloudsdale for her foal.//</span><br />Semicolons are a formal enough thing that you really have to get them right, and you don&#039;t have an independent clause after it. I think a dash would work well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top wasn&#039;t sure about how this made her feel.//</span><br />The narration after this gives me the same idea perfectly well, so stating it here so stoically is superfluous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;light.Today//</span><br />Missing a space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;normally weighed down by a much larger load//</span><br />This is pretty redundant with the previous &quot;Her wagon is unfamiliarly light.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shade cloth//</span><br />Might just want to call it an awning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You&#039;re welcome to first pickings if you want.”</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;“Why, thank you!” Roseluck says, picking out//</span><br />Watch the repetitive use of &quot;picking.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Roseluck giggles and blushes crimson//</span><br />That&#039;s a really questionable speaking verb. I could live with giggling a couple of words, but this is used as an attribution for two long sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot&#039;s voice is thin and weak by the end of the last sentence.//</span><br />In contrast, this seems like a very external perspective. Carrot Top wouldn&#039;t be self-aware enough to realize this about herself, especially given what&#039;s happening.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Grabbing what she could, she boarded the first non-stop train to Canterlot.//</span><br />Note that participles imply simultaneous action, so she&#039;s grabbing her things from home at the same time she&#039;s boarding the train. And it&#039;s &quot;nonstop.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the receptionist behind a glass booth//</span><br />Well, she&#039;s behind glass. But she&#039;s not behind the booth; she&#039;s in it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sir//</span><br />The only reason to capitalize this as a term of address would be if it&#039;s a title, as in a knighthood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top hooves//</span><br />Missing a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cloud Angel//</span><br />You had properly been italicizing the ship&#039;s name, but now you&#039;ve stopped.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hiccuping//</span><br />Is that really the best word choice here? That&#039;s something else entirely.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she began to feel a deep, terrible fear//</span><br />Right around here, you&#039;re spending an awful lot of time directly informing me of character emotions. Show me how they act and get me to deduce those emotions, and I&#039;ll care a lot more about their predicament.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top&#039;s mouth opened and shut soundlessly. She felt tears swelling in her eyes again. The two looked at each other for a long while, neither knowing what to say to the other.//</span><br />This is a great plot development. It contrasts nicely that Carrot found the whole place so alien, even a bit revolting, but suddenly has this common ground with him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mid afternoon//</span><br />mid-afternoon<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot Top checks the big clock on Town Hall//</span><br />There actually isn&#039;t a clock on Ponyville&#039;s town hall, but there is one on Ponyville Tower.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>‘Scarcity like an armed bandit.’</i></span><br />I can&#039;t see a reason for italicizing this, since you already have it enclosed in quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trying to figure out how this explanation is different from her own//</span><br />Another perspective leap. This is in Dinky&#039;s point of view unless you qualify it as Carrot&#039;s interpretation of how Dinky looks and acts.<br /><br />That last sentence… I appreciate the point you&#039;re trying to make, but it&#039;s a bit weak. I think it&#039;d work better if you tied it more strongly to the thematic remarks you&#039;d made all along about the house&#039;s size.<br /><br />So it should be obvious what a few of the main problems are. The perspective jumps around a bit too much, and I&#039;m not sure it needs to jump around at all. You usually have it in Carrot&#039;s point of view, so just pay attention to keeping it there. Along those lines, the few places where you put items in parentheses inside the narration seem a bit odd. Like I said, those types of things often work best in first person. But not only with who holds the perspective—you jump between a very tight focus and a distant one. At the risk of saying something you already know, an omniscient or objective narrator stand dispassionately away from the action and has no opinions about it. A limited or subjective narrator effectively takes on one of the characters&#039; perspectives (or can shift between multiple characters, as long as the transition is handled well—I won&#039;t go into it, since it doesn&#039;t seem applicable here, but you can read the section on talking heads at the top of this thread if you&#039;re curious). This narrator can speak the character&#039;s thoughts and opinions as his own. You go back and forth between these. There are certainly statements a limited narrator will say that can sound omniscient, like when they&#039;re simple statements of fact, so that there are no feelings or opinions involved. That makes it fairly important to delve into a feeling or opinion regularly so you keep the narration subjective often enough to feel consistent. A lot of these parenthetical elements are essentially a limited narrator, and you could take them out of parentheses. That way, the narrator is just speaking on Carrot&#039;s behalf, and it forges a closer link between her and the reader. You might want to consider doing so and adding in even more to keep that feel up throughout the story. Or if you&#039;d rather back off to a more objective narrator, again, keep that consistent throughout the story, then if you want to express Carrot&#039;s opinions and thoughts, do so as quoted thoughts instead of narration. Either way works; the point is consistency.<br /><br />Next, the verb tenses go all over the place. I get the sense that you&#039;re not a native English speaker; I apologize if I&#039;m wrong about that (your use of German would seem to give me a clue as to your nationality—I took four years of German in school and halfway expected the proverb Carrot alluded to would be a good German one. I was not disappointed, though I thought it would be &quot;Arbeit macht das Leben süß.&quot;) I have not dismissed the possibility that these tense changes were intentional, but I couldn&#039;t find a reason or pattern, so if they were, please tell me so that I can take another look and see if it accomplishes what you want it to. I&#039;m talking more about changes from one sentence to the next; having a scene in a different tense that the one before it isn&#039;t as big a deal, and I could tell in general when you did that.<br /><br />Next is the sheer number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Well, I had the impression that there were a lot, but it&#039;s important to verify that after the fact, and of the easier forms to search on, I counted 141. That&#039;s about one every three sentences, which isn&#039;t awful. So it&#039;s not so much the raw number, but more that I noticed plenty of times where you could have easily rephrased using a more active verb. &quot;To be&quot; is a very boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is, so consider trying to reduce them some.<br /><br />Last issue, and this is more a suggestion. I was hoping to see you make more of this interaction with the griffon officer after the fact. I already told you why I thought it was a powerful moment, and I think it&#039;s a wonderful point for the story to make, if you care to have Carrot Top reflect on it at all, on the shallow end, or perhaps even strike up a friendship with him, on the deeper end.<br /><br />In summary, please fix this story up, because I thought it was a wonderful sentiment, and I&#039;d like to see it go up on the blog.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, May 3rd, 2014 10:54</span></div><br/>

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 200

>>130339

Thank you for your in-depth response. I especially appreciate your comments on how word choice can muddy the sense of tense or narrative perspective. As a new writer, these concepts can be tricky for me to pick out without an experienced pair of eyes. I'll be sure to talk to my editor about these issues when I have the chance. I'm also pretty embarrassed about all the grammatical/spelling errors; I'm still not used to reading fiction with the intent of finding these.

There are definitely some tense shifts that I'd like to address, but I'd like to clarify my intentions behind the larger-scale ones. I've tried to write the "flashback" sequences in past tense and the "current" events in present tense to make a more implicit distinction between the two and to give the reader the sense that Carrot Top is remembering these past events. Of course, if this is out of hand I'll consider revision. Tense changes within scenes, on the other hand, are not intended at all. Thank you for bringing this issue to light.

Concerning the comma splices, I actually tried to make all of CT's thought interjections (usually in parenthesis) feel organic in the sense that they are written the way someone would think these concepts, not how someone would write them. Clearly this is a swing and a miss, so I'll go ahead and address these problems.

>"Awning"

I can't believe my vocabulary is so meager that I couldn't remember this word. Thanks for the suggestion.

Your compliments on the embassy scene are very appreciated. I was actually really worried that I was shooting too high for a writer of my caliber in that sequence. It means a lot to me that you found it impactful. Thank you.

I'll see what I can do about establishing a greater thematic tie to the size of the house. If anything falls flat here, I'd be glad to fix it.

I like your suggestions about making the narrator feel closer to Carrot Top and the reader. This piece was originally a really experimental mood/tone exercise, so forging this bond between narrator and character is important to me. I'll be sure to try to make narrative perspective more consistent, and I'll try to integrate the parenthetical interjections into the text more intimately.

English is actually my first language, but I attended an international high school in Beijing. This has given both my writing and my speaking an odd "slant" that I occasionally get a little frustrated with. A lot of the students there were speaking English as a second or third language, so they were most comfortable with passively-voiced sentences in their writing. Considering the startling number of "to be"s I've included in this story, I'm guessing it rubbed off on me. Don't worry about suspecting me to be German; I'm actually relieved and flattered. Writing foreign mannerisms and speech was probably one of the biggest reasons why I was afraid that the embassy scene might fall flat.

I'll need to think for a bit about expanding the role of the griffon officer in the story. I liked the way I used him, so I'm a bit apprehensive about any changes to his role. Could you elaborate a little on how and why you'd like to see this done? This sounds like a good idea, but any other information at this point would be appreciated.

Again, thank you for your response. I'm glad to hear that you at least enjoyed the idea of this story. Take care!

-B.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130339" onclick="return highlight('130339', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130339">&gt;&gt;130339</a><br /><br />Thank you for your in-depth response. I especially appreciate your comments on how word choice can muddy the sense of tense or narrative perspective. As a new writer, these concepts can be tricky for me to pick out without an experienced pair of eyes. I&#039;ll be sure to talk to my editor about these issues when I have the chance. I&#039;m also pretty embarrassed about all the grammatical/spelling errors; I&#039;m still not used to reading fiction with the intent of finding these.<br /><br />There are definitely some tense shifts that I&#039;d like to address, but I&#039;d like to clarify my intentions behind the larger-scale ones. I&#039;ve tried to write the &quot;flashback&quot; sequences in past tense and the &quot;current&quot; events in present tense to make a more implicit distinction between the two and to give the reader the sense that Carrot Top is remembering these past events. Of course, if this is out of hand I&#039;ll consider revision. Tense changes within scenes, on the other hand, are not intended at all. Thank you for bringing this issue to light.<br /><br />Concerning the comma splices, I actually tried to make all of CT&#039;s thought interjections (usually in parenthesis) feel organic in the sense that they are written the way someone would think these concepts, not how someone would write them. Clearly this is a swing and a miss, so I&#039;ll go ahead and address these problems.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Awning&quot; </span><br />I can&#039;t believe my vocabulary is so meager that I couldn&#039;t remember this word. Thanks for the suggestion.<br /><br />Your compliments on the embassy scene are very appreciated. I was actually really worried that I was shooting too high for a writer of my caliber in that sequence. It means a lot to me that you found it impactful. Thank you.<br /><br />I&#039;ll see what I can do about establishing a greater thematic tie to the size of the house. If anything falls flat here, I&#039;d be glad to fix it.<br /><br />I like your suggestions about making the narrator feel closer to Carrot Top and the reader. This piece was originally a really experimental mood/tone exercise, so forging this bond between narrator and character is important to me. I&#039;ll be sure to try to make narrative perspective more consistent, and I&#039;ll try to integrate the parenthetical interjections into the text more intimately.<br /><br />English is actually my first language, but I attended an international high school in Beijing. This has given both my writing and my speaking an odd &quot;slant&quot; that I occasionally get a little frustrated with. A lot of the students there were speaking English as a second or third language, so they were most comfortable with passively-voiced sentences in their writing. Considering the startling number of &quot;to be&quot;s I&#039;ve included in this story, I&#039;m guessing it rubbed off on me. Don&#039;t worry about suspecting me to be German; I&#039;m actually relieved and flattered. Writing foreign mannerisms and speech was probably one of the biggest reasons why I was afraid that the embassy scene might fall flat.<br /><br />I&#039;ll need to think for a bit about expanding the role of the griffon officer in the story. I liked the way I used him, so I&#039;m a bit apprehensive about any changes to his role. Could you elaborate a little on how and why you&#039;d like to see this done? This sounds like a good idea, but any other information at this point would be appreciated.<br /><br />Again, thank you for your response. I&#039;m glad to hear that you at least enjoyed the idea of this story. Take care!<br /><br />-B.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, May 3rd, 2014 11:18</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 201

>>130341
I figured that you intended for the flashbacks to be past tense and the regular narration to be present. That's perfectly fine. It's just that within each, the tense jumped around enough that I wasn't sure if you were trying to do something artistic with that.

Regarding the griffon officer, I don't necessarily mean writing an entire new scene to show him having some subsequent interaction with Carrot. It could be something as simple as noticing in the final scene that she's gotten a letter from him or that she's sending him a letter, or even just that she's thinking about him. Even a minor way of showing that she's come out of that interaction with something meaningful and some new perspective on what she found off-putting about his culture would carry a lot of power. It would also show that her feelings from that encounter carry forward instead of just getting dropped when that scene ended. It really wouldn't take much, and then suddenly your story carries another message or reinforces your point of Carrot being accepting of Ditzy, who was also alien in a way.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130341" onclick="return highlight('130341', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130341">&gt;&gt;130341</a><br />I figured that you intended for the flashbacks to be past tense and the regular narration to be present. That&#039;s perfectly fine. It&#039;s just that within each, the tense jumped around enough that I wasn&#039;t sure if you were trying to do something artistic with that.<br /><br />Regarding the griffon officer, I don&#039;t necessarily mean writing an entire new scene to show him having some subsequent interaction with Carrot. It could be something as simple as noticing in the final scene that she&#039;s gotten a letter from him or that she&#039;s sending him a letter, or even just that she&#039;s thinking about him. Even a minor way of showing that she&#039;s come out of that interaction with something meaningful and some new perspective on what she found off-putting about his culture would carry a lot of power. It would also show that her feelings from that encounter carry forward instead of just getting dropped when that scene ended. It really wouldn&#039;t take much, and then suddenly your story carries another message or reinforces your point of Carrot being accepting of Ditzy, who was also alien in a way.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 202

>>130343

Thanks for your help! I'll see what I can do.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130343" onclick="return highlight('130343', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130343">&gt;&gt;130343</a><br /><br />Thanks for your help! I&#039;ll see what I can do.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 203

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>"Can I not sleep for another ten minutes, Mother? I am most comfortable."//

I suspect this will become problematic, but I'll wait and see if we get an explanation. For now, though, this doesn't sound like what a child would say. Same goes for much of the narration, given that it's essentially her thoughts.

>a slight frown finding its way onto my face//

This may just be me, so I won't count it against you, but such flowery language about one's own body language never rings true. She wouldn't think about it this way. She'd just frown. Yes, it can make for more interesting language, but it makes for less authentic first-person narration.

>Mayhaps//

People understandably confuse this with "perhaps." It's "mayhap."

>I love my mother's hugs.//

This stands as a solitary cold fact. What does she like about them? How do they make her feel? Without that, this statement doesn't connect me with the character.

>My smile returns//

>my smile falls//
>My smile returns//
>Once more my smile fades.//
This takes place over just 7 paragraphs. Watch the repetition. You Use "smile" 9 times in just the first two screenfuls.

>nasty ponies//

Given that she's friends with one, I really hope you'll play up this dichotomy in her attitude.

>A joyful feeling fills my heart//

>the joy I feel begins slipping away//
Besides being repetitive, that's getting pretty telly for what should be an important emotional moment.

>and you may begin helping him on the farm when planting time comes//

Okay, you've officially lost me with the narrator's voicing and dialogue. I was unsure how old she was such that she could even be expected to know such syntax and vocabulary. I was also unsure of what their station in life was. I might even buy her being this precocious if she were a member of a noble family who had been trained in diplomacy and the art of conversation from a young age. But they're farmers. We've heard two canon griffons speak, and neither sounded fancy at all, so I have no basis to assume that's their default. So the next step is to show me why these ones break the mold, and I don't see any justification why a farmer's wife and child would speak like Shakespearean actors.

>once again she begins//

While I get what you mean, this sounds somewhat contradictory.

>Mother walks over to a nearby storage closet, and opens it up.//

You've been good about this so far. You don't need this comma, since it's all a single clause. I only pointed out a few of these, but there are more. There's explanation at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

>I like the sound of money jingling.//

This is a much more believable childlike line that waxing philosophical.

>I take five of them from the stack, and place them on a shelf closer to my height.//

Another unnecessary comma.

>the items that Mother requested and wrapping them in the cloths for safekeeping. I note that the food Mother requested//

Repetitive wording again.

>Mother dissolves the cloud//

Why is this necessary?

>three-quarters//

In this usage, you don't need the hyphen.

>I find it intimidating//

Make me see this. Show me a couple of the encounters and how she reacts to them. That will carry far more power than giving me a stoic summary.

>tired looking//

And now you do need the hyphen for the compound modifier.

>The griffin brings the carrot to his mouth once more, but he pauses with it halfway to his mouth//

That's fairly repetitive and contradictory.

>motions for me to lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

You're really losing the character of your narrator during this whole discussion. In the scene at home, she gave her thoughts and impressions constantly, but here, she's staying in the background and delivering only the facts. For all I know, she's a statue standing there. How does she react to the discussion? What are her impressions of this old griffin?

>my eyes wide and fearful//

That's an awfully self-aware thing for a first-person narrator to say. It's like she's more cognizant of the fact that her eyes are wide than the emotion which produced it. And by naming the emotion, it makes it a little less immediate for one that'd come on suddenly like this. It'd take her a second to sort out her feelings. She'd first get a wash of raw, disconnected emotion before she understood it.

>Mother runs her claws through my head feathers//

She does that an awful lot, and with identical phrasing.

>I know today is a scary day, Kadie, but you are a big griffin now, and I know you can be brave when the ponies pass by us.//

This whole scene just gives me an impression of her as a much younger child than one who would use such formal language in speech, much less thought.

>She is noticeably older, I note that she obtained one of the "cutie marks" that the ponies seem to covet since I last saw her, but her identity is unmistakable.//

That first comma is a splice.

>joy in my voice//

See, by having her identify the joy in her voice and not in her, it really detaches her emotions from her, and consequently from me.

>the ones in midnight blue armor have leathery wings that rather remind me of bats protruding from their sides//

Phrasing is a little off here. It sounds like bats are protruding from their sides, since the modifier is located with "bats" and not "wings."

>Some of the flying ponies are in the air//

Aren't all of the flying ponies in the air, by definition? Maybe not all the winged ponies, but all the flying ones are.

Well, this story certainly impresses with its fanciness, but then does the fanciness belong? The few cues I get as to your narrator's age indicate someone maybe a little older than the CMCs, and yet she speaks like a highly educated and refined adult. So does her mother. And they're from a rural farming community. This just doesn't fit. You have two nicely voiced characters, but their voices are completely at odds with who they are. I was convinced in the first couple of paragraphs that Kadie would end up being the emperor's daughter, and that would have worked. But Gustave le Grande and Gilda just don't talk anything like this, and unless those just happen to be two outliers, this isn't language the average griffin would use. But then not only do Kadie and her mother talk this way, some random stranger does as well, and so do a few snippets of conversation from the crowd. In fact, every griffin in the story talks like this. I don't buy it.

The ending… I'm not sure what to make of it. It doesn't come to any conclusion or deliver any message. No characters have changed as a result of these events. There's certainly potential for Kadie to change, but she doesn't do anything with the new information she has. Does she accept Celestia's words? Or does her mother convince her it was all for show? There are times when an open-ended conclusion works, but usually not when it's the sole source of conflict in the story or when one of the major possibilities is that nothing changed and nothing that happened in the story mattered. There's one other way to use character growth as a stand-in for conflict, and it's a difficult one to do well: when one character learns something surprising about another character, even when it's something the reader already knows. So I came into this strongly suspecting that Celestia wouldn't turn out to be some cruel conqueror, and she wasn't. No surprise to me, but possibly one to Kadie, if she believes it. Yet she has very little reaction to it and even less reaction to her mother's response.

This kind of ties in, but the strength of a first-person narrator is that we have direct access to her thoughts, and she can't keep anything from us. Unless she's deliberately suppressing it from her mind, and then we should get that train of thought. Yet she is curiously absent from some of the story's bigger emotional moments, like at the end, and when she spends the bulk of the night in the inn as a stone figure on the shelf watching everything happen around her. Contrast that with the next morning, where she's acting very childlike and genuine, not wanting to get out of bed and go off to this distasteful event. Keep her level of engagement more consistent and make her presence known throughout.

I guess I', also a bit at a loss as to what tags are appropriate. There wasn't really anything sad here, and while adventure is hinted at, it's not directly present. Were it my story, I'd probably just call it [Normal] or maybe [Slice of Life], though people have different ideas of what those entail.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Can I not sleep for another ten minutes, Mother? I am most comfortable.&quot;//</span><br />I suspect this will become problematic, but I&#039;ll wait and see if we get an explanation. For now, though, this doesn&#039;t sound like what a child would say. Same goes for much of the narration, given that it&#039;s essentially her thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a slight frown finding its way onto my face//</span><br />This may just be me, so I won&#039;t count it against you, but such flowery language about one&#039;s own body language never rings true. She wouldn&#039;t think about it this way. She&#039;d just frown. Yes, it can make for more interesting language, but it makes for less authentic first-person narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mayhaps//</span><br />People understandably confuse this with &quot;perhaps.&quot; It&#039;s &quot;mayhap.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I love my mother&#039;s hugs.//</span><br />This stands as a solitary cold fact. What does she like about them? How do they make her feel? Without that, this statement doesn&#039;t connect me with the character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My smile returns//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my smile falls//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My smile returns//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once more my smile fades.//</span><br />This takes place over just 7 paragraphs. Watch the repetition. You Use &quot;smile&quot; 9 times in just the first two screenfuls.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nasty ponies//</span><br />Given that she&#039;s friends with one, I really hope you&#039;ll play up this dichotomy in her attitude.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A joyful feeling fills my heart//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the joy I feel begins slipping away//</span><br />Besides being repetitive, that&#039;s getting pretty telly for what should be an important emotional moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and you may begin helping him on the farm when planting time comes//</span><br />Okay, you&#039;ve officially lost me with the narrator&#039;s voicing and dialogue. I was unsure how old she was such that she could even be expected to know such syntax and vocabulary. I was also unsure of what their station in life was. I might even buy her being this precocious if she were a member of a noble family who had been trained in diplomacy and the art of conversation from a young age. But they&#039;re farmers. We&#039;ve heard two canon griffons speak, and neither sounded fancy at all, so I have no basis to assume that&#039;s their default. So the next step is to show me why these ones break the mold, and I don&#039;t see any justification why a farmer&#039;s wife and child would speak like Shakespearean actors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once again she begins//</span><br />While I get what you mean, this sounds somewhat contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mother walks over to a nearby storage closet, and opens it up.//</span><br />You&#039;ve been good about this so far. You don&#039;t need this comma, since it&#039;s all a single clause. I only pointed out a few of these, but there are more. There&#039;s explanation at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I like the sound of money jingling.//</span><br />This is a much more believable childlike line that waxing philosophical.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I take five of them from the stack, and place them on a shelf closer to my height.//</span><br />Another unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the items that Mother requested and wrapping them in the cloths for safekeeping. I note that the food Mother requested//</span><br />Repetitive wording again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mother dissolves the cloud//</span><br />Why is this necessary?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;three-quarters//</span><br />In this usage, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I find it intimidating//</span><br />Make me see this. Show me a couple of the encounters and how she reacts to them. That will carry far more power than giving me a stoic summary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tired looking//</span><br />And now you do need the hyphen for the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The griffin brings the carrot to his mouth once more, but he pauses with it halfway to his mouth//</span><br />That&#039;s fairly repetitive and contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;motions for me to lay down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br />You&#039;re really losing the character of your narrator during this whole discussion. In the scene at home, she gave her thoughts and impressions constantly, but here, she&#039;s staying in the background and delivering only the facts. For all I know, she&#039;s a statue standing there. How does she react to the discussion? What are her impressions of this old griffin?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my eyes wide and fearful//</span><br />That&#039;s an awfully self-aware thing for a first-person narrator to say. It&#039;s like she&#039;s more cognizant of the fact that her eyes are wide than the emotion which produced it. And by naming the emotion, it makes it a little less immediate for one that&#039;d come on suddenly like this. It&#039;d take her a second to sort out her feelings. She&#039;d first get a wash of raw, disconnected emotion before she understood it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mother runs her claws through my head feathers//</span><br />She does that an awful lot, and with identical phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know today is a scary day, Kadie, but you are a big griffin now, and I know you can be brave when the ponies pass by us.//</span><br />This whole scene just gives me an impression of her as a much younger child than one who would use such formal language in speech, much less thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She is noticeably older, I note that she obtained one of the &quot;cutie marks&quot; that the ponies seem to covet since I last saw her, but her identity is unmistakable.//</span><br />That first comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;joy in my voice//</span><br />See, by having her identify the joy in her voice and not in <i>her</i>, it really detaches her emotions from her, and consequently from me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the ones in midnight blue armor have leathery wings that rather remind me of bats protruding from their sides//</span><br />Phrasing is a little off here. It sounds like bats are protruding from their sides, since the modifier is located with &quot;bats&quot; and not &quot;wings.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Some of the flying ponies are in the air//</span><br />Aren&#039;t <i>all</i> of the flying ponies in the air, by definition? Maybe not all the winged ponies, but all the flying ones are.<br /><br />Well, this story certainly impresses with its fanciness, but then does the fanciness belong? The few cues I get as to your narrator&#039;s age indicate someone maybe a little older than the CMCs, and yet she speaks like a highly educated and refined adult. So does her mother. And they&#039;re from a rural farming community. This just doesn&#039;t fit. You have two nicely voiced characters, but their voices are completely at odds with who they are. I was convinced in the first couple of paragraphs that Kadie would end up being the emperor&#039;s daughter, and that would have worked. But Gustave le Grande and Gilda just don&#039;t talk anything like this, and unless those just happen to be two outliers, this isn&#039;t language the average griffin would use. But then not only do Kadie and her mother talk this way, some random stranger does as well, and so do a few snippets of conversation from the crowd. In fact, <i>every</i> griffin in the story talks like this. I don&#039;t buy it.<br /><br />The ending… I&#039;m not sure what to make of it. It doesn&#039;t come to any conclusion or deliver any message. No characters have changed as a result of these events. There&#039;s certainly potential for Kadie to change, but she doesn&#039;t do anything with the new information she has. Does she accept Celestia&#039;s words? Or does her mother convince her it was all for show? There are times when an open-ended conclusion works, but usually not when it&#039;s the sole source of conflict in the story or when one of the major possibilities is that nothing changed and nothing that happened in the story mattered. There&#039;s one other way to use character growth as a stand-in for conflict, and it&#039;s a difficult one to do well: when one character learns something surprising about another character, even when it&#039;s something the reader already knows. So I came into this strongly suspecting that Celestia wouldn&#039;t turn out to be some cruel conqueror, and she wasn&#039;t. No surprise to me, but possibly one to Kadie, if she believes it. Yet she has very little reaction to it and even less reaction to her mother&#039;s response.<br /><br />This kind of ties in, but the strength of a first-person narrator is that we have direct access to her thoughts, and she can&#039;t keep anything from us. Unless she&#039;s deliberately suppressing it from her mind, and then we should get that train of thought. Yet she is curiously absent from some of the story&#039;s bigger emotional moments, like at the end, and when she spends the bulk of the night in the inn as a stone figure on the shelf watching everything happen around her. Contrast that with the next morning, where she&#039;s acting very childlike and genuine, not wanting to get out of bed and go off to this distasteful event. Keep her level of engagement more consistent and make her presence known throughout.<br /><br />I guess I&#039;, also a bit at a loss as to what tags are appropriate. There wasn&#039;t really anything sad here, and while adventure is hinted at, it&#039;s not directly present. Were it my story, I&#039;d probably just call it [Normal] or maybe [Slice of Life], though people have different ideas of what those entail.<br />

Conquerors Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 204

>>130371
I'll do my best to fix up the errors, then. However, I do have one issue: they talk like that because this story is set before the events of Nightmare Moon. This is over a thousand years in the past, so no, even as farmers she's not going to talk like Gilda. If you have suggestions on how to make that clearer, I'm all ears, of course. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130371" onclick="return highlight('130371', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130371">&gt;&gt;130371</a><br />I&#039;ll do my best to fix up the errors, then. However, I do have one issue: they talk like that because this story is set before the events of Nightmare Moon. This is over a thousand years in the past, so no, even as farmers she&#039;s not going to talk like Gilda. If you have suggestions on how to make that clearer, I&#039;m all ears, of course.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 205

>>130377
I did briefly consider the possibility that this took place in the distant past, but the archaic bits of language here and there are used inconsistently. And in that case, wouldn't there be an even greater difference between the lower and upper classes in understanding of language? The tendency is to assume Equestrian history vaguely mirrors Earth's in the absence of any direct evidence otherwise, so consider how likely it would be for a farmer's daughter in tenth-century England to use proper grammar and have a broad vocabulary. You're free to create a world where they do, of course, but as it's not the natural assumption, it kind of comes out of nowhere.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130377" onclick="return highlight('130377', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130377">&gt;&gt;130377</a><br />I did briefly consider the possibility that this took place in the distant past, but the archaic bits of language here and there are used inconsistently. And in that case, wouldn&#039;t there be an even greater difference between the lower and upper classes in understanding of language? The tendency is to assume Equestrian history vaguely mirrors Earth&#039;s in the absence of any direct evidence otherwise, so consider how likely it would be for a farmer&#039;s daughter in tenth-century England to use proper grammar and have a broad vocabulary. You&#039;re free to create a world where they do, of course, but as it&#039;s not the natural assumption, it kind of comes out of nowhere.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 206

>>130383
Yeah, so any suggestions on how to fix that, then? I mean, I'm not completely familiar with how 10th century farmers would speak, and I think that giving them goofy accents would just destroy the tone. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130383" onclick="return highlight('130383', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130383">&gt;&gt;130383</a><br />Yeah, so any suggestions on how to fix that, then? I mean, I&#039;m not completely familiar with how 10th century farmers would speak, and I think that giving them goofy accents would just destroy the tone.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 207

>>130383
Is it a possibility to make them not necessarily a noble family, like rich enough to live in the capital, but one that own some land, and has peasants that work on the land that they own, and those are the ones that fly with them? Like in Feudal Europe you had the serfs, then the landowners, then the nobles, then the kings etc? That would give reason for Kadie and her mother to speak a little more intelligently: they've had some education. At the same time, though, they aren't nobles, so they aren't hugely important. They're one level down from nobles, but one up from serfs. Obviously I'd have to change one or two more things to fit that into the story, but it's a thought I had. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130383" onclick="return highlight('130383', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130383">&gt;&gt;130383</a><br />Is it a possibility to make them not necessarily a noble family, like rich enough to live in the capital, but one that own some land, and has peasants that work on the land that they own, and those are the ones that fly with them? Like in Feudal Europe you had the serfs, then the landowners, then the nobles, then the kings etc? That would give reason for Kadie and her mother to speak a little more intelligently: they&#039;ve had some education. At the same time, though, they aren&#039;t nobles, so they aren&#039;t hugely important. They&#039;re one level down from nobles, but one up from serfs. Obviously I&#039;d have to change one or two more things to fit that into the story, but it&#039;s a thought I had.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 208

>>130386
There are many tiers of nobility, so they could be one of the lower rungs of that. Basically, anyone with a minor title would still have access to education. In that case, I'd almost see the mother as putting on airs to seem more than she is, and insisting that Kadie speak in such a manner to keep up appearances. That's just one interpretation, but at least an example of where this could come from.

As an example of how a commoner might speak… well, on the one hand, you'd have someone using horrible grammar and packed with colloquialisms, but on the other, the Hearth's Warming play featured some peasants from that time, who spoke in a fairly modern vernacular. While I'd think that play is fairly old, it's certainly possible that it would have been dressed up to feel more sophisticated and may well not be an accurate portrayal.

You did have one use of "thyself," though it wasn't at a time suitable for being formal, unless the mother was just trying to sound very authoritative there. But then not a single "thee" or "thou," so it was an odd departure. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130386" onclick="return highlight('130386', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130386">&gt;&gt;130386</a><br />There are many tiers of nobility, so they could be one of the lower rungs of that. Basically, anyone with a minor title would still have access to education. In that case, I&#039;d almost see the mother as putting on airs to seem more than she is, and insisting that Kadie speak in such a manner to keep up appearances. That&#039;s just one interpretation, but at least an example of where this could come from.<br /><br />As an example of how a commoner might speak… well, on the one hand, you&#039;d have someone using horrible grammar and packed with colloquialisms, but on the other, the Hearth&#039;s Warming play featured some peasants from that time, who spoke in a fairly modern vernacular. While I&#039;d think that play is fairly old, it&#039;s certainly possible that it would have been dressed up to feel more sophisticated and may well not be an accurate portrayal.<br /><br />You did have one use of &quot;thyself,&quot; though it wasn&#039;t at a time suitable for being formal, unless the mother was just trying to sound very authoritative there. But then not a single &quot;thee&quot; or &quot;thou,&quot; so it was an odd departure.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 209

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>everything your doing//

Your/you're confusion.

>Hoo-ee!//

>outta//
One of the most common things writers do wrong with letters and journals is to put things in there that simply don't belong in the format. You're doing alright here, except these two things are much more speech affectations than something someone would actually write. As a fully licensed southerner, I'll also say that it's incredibly rare to see someone use "y'all" as a singular term.

>Twiiiiiiliiiiiight~//

Please no ~ as punctuation.

>her majesty//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>books lie splayed open//

Tense shift.

>She trotted over to the door, opening it enough to peek her head out, and said, “Um, pardon me, guards?”//

Here's another problem that inexperience authors often have. You're using a ton of participles. In the seven sentences of this paragraph, you have four of them. They also bring the danger of synchronization errors and misplaced modifiers, though I haven't noticed any yet.

>‘bolts//

Smart quotes are bad with leading apostrophes. This one's backward.

>She looked back at Twilight, seeing a frown where she had expected an embarrassed smile.//

Watch your perspective. You'd been telling the story from Twilight's point of view so far, but the way this is phrased, it's not how Twilight perceives Rarity; it's told from inside Rarity's head.

>their learning//

Their/they're confusion.

>Rarity’s tone filled with concerned, and she whined slightly.

Avoid informing me directly of character emotions, unless it's a small line of little importance. But here's a pretty crucial emotional moment in the story. Describe how Rarity acts and looks so that I infer her concern. That connects me with the character. I'm also not sure why she'd b whining here. It seems inappropriate. And there's a typo.

>“When I read their letters…” She paused, starting at a crack in the floor. “…I think//

Are you sure you meant "starting" and not "staring"? While this is fine as is, it feels more like you meant it as an aside, which would be punctuated/capitalized like this:
“When I read their letters—” she paused, starting at a crack in the floor “—I think

>wish that I,” she sniffled, “that I//

Now, this one definitely needs to be punctuated like an aside. Really, they both do, since by connecting the narration with a comma, you're making it an attribution, but you have no speaking verbs.

>petting//

You must mean "patting."

>the Rarity//

Huh?

>annunciating//

enunciating

>from out Neighjing//

Phrasing.

>West//

Why is this capitalized?

>age - except//

Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen.

>the Carousel Boutique//

You generally don't put "the" in front of a proper noun that doesn't already include it.

>it’s been the driving a lot of our recent business//

Extraneous word.

>Twilight’s heart swelled.//

It just did that a few paragraphs back. Watch the repetition.

>“Excellent! Next month we should…” A heavy knock on the door interrupted her.//

An interruption would be more of a dash, not an ellipsis.

>is from actually from her//

Phrasing.

>handing//

What's a hand?

First, the good news. The writing is of good quality, and the types of problems I found are pretty easy to fix. I didn't catch you being telly more than once or twice, which is the nemesis of the inexperienced writer, so by luck or by skill, good job on that. You also have a nice feel for character voicing. The letters all sounded authentic, but more so with Rarity's dialogue, since that's an extended interaction and thus harder to get right consistently.

Then the bad. I read the comments, and you seem pretty oblivious to what's already been done again and again in this fandom. Twilight (or any other alicorn) contemplating her immortality is a particularly common theme. That said, there are always fresh angles on old premises, and you're avoiding a great deal of what's been written already by having Twilight react in a completely upbeat manner to all this. She genuinely treasures the letters, and her tears are ones of appreciation. It kind of put me in mind of "Yours Truly," which had a similar play on the significance of letters and an optimistic attitude, though it didn't look at them through the guise of immortality (it preceded Twilicorn). While not without its flaws, that story was a refreshing take on the subject of the emotional connections of friends through letters, in that it didn't devolve into a tear-streaked angst-fest. Now, I'm certainly not the most well-versed person around in the world of ponyfic. I rarely read anything I'm not reviewing, so while I know this is a common topic to tackle, I don't know exactly how common.

It's also a common method to have all of the Mane 6 involved and for the story to focus on the last living one, though I wouldn't necessarily recommend you change that in this case. It would be odd for one or more to be excluded, and they've set this up so that Twilight will only get the letters after they die, so it fits with your premise. But I would ask these things about it: Why would Rarity go ahead and deliver the ones from the rest of them and ruin the surprise, as it were? It seems odd that they didn't each have theirs delivered on the occasion of their death, or since that would blow the secret for the other five when the first one died, hold them all until they all died. In this way, Rarity's letters would be as unexpected as the rest. And there's no indication of why these letters were so special. There are far more than we get to see in the story, so I'm not sure why those ones in particular were chosen. They didn't stand out as especially notable. But I have to think they would have kept up correspondences with Twilight outside of this project. I mean, I think Twilight would notice if they all completely stopped writing to her. So again, what's special about these ones that they get held back while others go through? But getting back to the possibility that they did abstain from writing her all these years, why deprive her of that? She seems the type who would very much enjoy exchanging letters, and while she now has a nice collection of letters from them, she can't answer them.

Another thing you have to ask yourself: what does it matter that the events of this story happened? I don't think you'll have a hard time answering that, but the story doesn't play up the answer very much. What drives a good story is either conflict or character growth. On conflict, what was at stake? What was someone willing to do to achieve a goal? What bad thing would happen if she didn't? For character growth, how is one of them different at the end of the story than at the beginning? What surprising thing do we learn about her than makes us rethink her character? Or (weaker, but still possible) what surprising thing does one character learn about another that makes her rethink her friend, even if it's something we already know? In either case, basically, what message do you want this story to carry? There's a nice sentiment involved, but it doesn't set up and resolve something other than some vague need Twilight has for familiar companionship.

So take these things under advisement and have another crack at it. I enjoyed reading this story, but if you do resubmit, I'd rather have a different pre-reader take it to get a better call on whether this plot is so overdone as to be ubiquitous, even given the nonstandard angle. I can't promise anything.

Before I go, a word about your cover page. Maybe it's as good a choice as any, but I'm not sure I agree with the [Sad] tag here, especially without any other. The situation is one with a certain amount of sadness loaded in it, but none of the characters actually get sad about it. I found it to be more uplifting in its positivity, really. And with more and more people seemingly complaining about the amount of sad posted on Equestria Daily, it might do you well to separate yourself from that as much as you can. In the same vein, the synopsis describes a story heavier on the angst and pain of outliving friends than the story actually delivers. Based on that alone, it sounded like you'd earn that [Sad]. So I'd encourage you to match the tone of your synopsis with that of the story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;everything your doing//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hoo-ee!//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;outta//</span><br />One of the most common things writers do wrong with letters and journals is to put things in there that simply don&#039;t belong in the format. You&#039;re doing alright here, except these two things are much more speech affectations than something someone would actually write. As a fully licensed southerner, I&#039;ll also say that it&#039;s incredibly rare to see someone use &quot;y&#039;all&quot; as a singular term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twiiiiiiliiiiiight~//</span><br />Please no ~ as punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her majesty//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;books lie splayed open//</span><br />Tense shift.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trotted over to the door, opening it enough to peek her head out, and said, “Um, pardon me, guards?”//</span><br />Here&#039;s another problem that inexperience authors often have. You&#039;re using a ton of participles. In the seven sentences of this paragraph, you have four of them. They also bring the danger of synchronization errors and misplaced modifiers, though I haven&#039;t noticed any yet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘bolts//</span><br />Smart quotes are bad with leading apostrophes. This one&#039;s backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked back at Twilight, seeing a frown where she had expected an embarrassed smile.//</span><br />Watch your perspective. You&#039;d been telling the story from Twilight&#039;s point of view so far, but the way this is phrased, it&#039;s not how Twilight perceives Rarity; it&#039;s told from inside Rarity&#039;s head.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;their learning//</span><br />Their/they&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s tone filled with concerned, and she whined slightly.</span><br />Avoid informing me directly of character emotions, unless it&#039;s a small line of little importance. But here&#039;s a pretty crucial emotional moment in the story. Describe how Rarity acts and looks so that I infer her concern. That connects me with the character. I&#039;m also not sure why she&#039;d b whining here. It seems inappropriate. And there&#039;s a typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“When I read their letters…” She paused, starting at a crack in the floor. “…I think//</span><br />Are you sure you meant &quot;starting&quot; and not &quot;staring&quot;? While this is fine as is, it feels more like you meant it as an aside, which would be punctuated/capitalized like this:<br />“When I read their letters—” she paused, starting at a crack in the floor “—I think<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wish that I,” she sniffled, “that I//</span><br />Now, this one definitely needs to be punctuated like an aside. Really, they both do, since by connecting the narration with a comma, you&#039;re making it an attribution, but you have no speaking verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;petting//</span><br />You must mean &quot;patting.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Rarity//</span><br />Huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;annunciating//</span><br />enunciating<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;from out Neighjing//</span><br />Phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;West//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;age - except//</span><br />Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Carousel Boutique//</span><br />You generally don&#039;t put &quot;the&quot; in front of a proper noun that doesn&#039;t already include it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s been the driving a lot of our recent business//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s heart swelled.//</span><br />It just did that a few paragraphs back. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Excellent! Next month we should…” A heavy knock on the door interrupted her.//</span><br />An interruption would be more of a dash, not an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;is from actually from her//</span><br />Phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;handing//</span><br />What&#039;s a hand?<br /><br />First, the good news. The writing is of good quality, and the types of problems I found are pretty easy to fix. I didn&#039;t catch you being telly more than once or twice, which is the nemesis of the inexperienced writer, so by luck or by skill, good job on that. You also have a nice feel for character voicing. The letters all sounded authentic, but more so with Rarity&#039;s dialogue, since that&#039;s an extended interaction and thus harder to get right consistently.<br /><br />Then the bad. I read the comments, and you seem pretty oblivious to what&#039;s already been done again and again in this fandom. Twilight (or any other alicorn) contemplating her immortality is a particularly common theme. That said, there are always fresh angles on old premises, and you&#039;re avoiding a great deal of what&#039;s been written already by having Twilight react in a completely upbeat manner to all this. She genuinely treasures the letters, and her tears are ones of appreciation. It kind of put me in mind of &quot;Yours Truly,&quot; which had a similar play on the significance of letters and an optimistic attitude, though it didn&#039;t look at them through the guise of immortality (it preceded Twilicorn). While not without its flaws, that story was a refreshing take on the subject of the emotional connections of friends through letters, in that it didn&#039;t devolve into a tear-streaked angst-fest. Now, I&#039;m certainly not the most well-versed person around in the world of ponyfic. I rarely read anything I&#039;m not reviewing, so while I know this is a common topic to tackle, I don&#039;t know exactly how common.<br /><br />It&#039;s also a common method to have all of the Mane 6 involved and for the story to focus on the last living one, though I wouldn&#039;t necessarily recommend you change that in this case. It would be odd for one or more to be excluded, and they&#039;ve set this up so that Twilight will only get the letters after they die, so it fits with your premise. But I would ask these things about it: Why would Rarity go ahead and deliver the ones from the rest of them and ruin the surprise, as it were? It seems odd that they didn&#039;t each have theirs delivered on the occasion of their death, or since that would blow the secret for the other five when the first one died, hold them all until they all died. In this way, Rarity&#039;s letters would be as unexpected as the rest. And there&#039;s no indication of why these letters were so special. There are far more than we get to see in the story, so I&#039;m not sure why those ones in particular were chosen. They didn&#039;t stand out as especially notable. But I have to think they would have kept up correspondences with Twilight outside of this project. I mean, I think Twilight would notice if they all completely stopped writing to her. So again, what&#039;s special about these ones that they get held back while others go through? But getting back to the possibility that they did abstain from writing her all these years, why deprive her of that? She seems the type who would very much enjoy exchanging letters, and while she now has a nice collection of letters from them, she can&#039;t answer them.<br /><br />Another thing you have to ask yourself: what does it matter that the events of this story happened? I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll have a hard time answering that, but the story doesn&#039;t play up the answer very much. What drives a good story is either conflict or character growth. On conflict, what was at stake? What was someone willing to do to achieve a goal? What bad thing would happen if she didn&#039;t? For character growth, how is one of them different at the end of the story than at the beginning? What surprising thing do we learn about her than makes us rethink her character? Or (weaker, but still possible) what surprising thing does one character learn about another that makes her rethink her friend, even if it&#039;s something we already know? In either case, basically, what message do you want this story to carry? There&#039;s a nice sentiment involved, but it doesn&#039;t set up and resolve something other than some vague need Twilight has for familiar companionship.<br /><br />So take these things under advisement and have another crack at it. I enjoyed reading this story, but if you do resubmit, I&#039;d rather have a different pre-reader take it to get a better call on whether this plot is so overdone as to be ubiquitous, even given the nonstandard angle. I can&#039;t promise anything.<br /><br />Before I go, a word about your cover page. Maybe it&#039;s as good a choice as any, but I&#039;m not sure I agree with the [Sad] tag here, especially without any other. The situation is one with a certain amount of sadness loaded in it, but none of the characters actually get sad about it. I found it to be more uplifting in its positivity, really. And with more and more people seemingly complaining about the amount of sad posted on Equestria Daily, it might do you well to separate yourself from that as much as you can. In the same vein, the synopsis describes a story heavier on the angst and pain of outliving friends than the story actually delivers. Based on that alone, it sounded like you&#039;d earn that [Sad]. So I&#039;d encourage you to match the tone of your synopsis with that of the story.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 210

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>not eager to get going but not too upset about leaving behind her cottage on the edge of Ponyville//

This really begs illustration. For one, it's the heart of your story, and for another, you need to capture the reader's emotions here at the beginning. She does go on to recall how everyone left town, which works to this end, but it's all a bit vague, especially this bit. A few one-sentence reminiscences brought on by keepsakes she sees lying around, for example, would really create the mood.

>(Fluttershy had heard a lot about her in all the magazines at the spa.)//

There isn't really a reason to put this in parentheses. It works fine a narration, and parentheses work better in a first-person narration, anyway.

>2//

Write out numbers this short.

>and she looked down at the key she had strung on a cord around her neck, which she had also forgotten was there//

So a key had been hanging around her neck for the last two years, and she never noticed it was there? That's awfully plot-convenient, to the point of being absurd.

>She doesn't pay me much attention//

Very similar phrasing to something you wrote just two paragraphs back. It feels repetitive.

>a stammered, 'I-I'//

When you're presenting it as a generic object and not specifically as speech, the rules change a bit. In short, you don't need that comma.

>all the support I can get just to get through the day//

Watch the repetition of "get." It wouldn't be hard to rephrase this to avoid it.

>taunting and teasing and jokes at her expense, which had definitely increased after her mother had died from cancer//

Two big problems here. First, having the teasing increase after her mother died? These kids are really scum. I mean to the point of not being believable in canon Equestria. If you want to build a gritter world, then more power to you, but unless you do that, I can't seen any kids doing that. Second, there's no reason to have her mother die of cancer. It's at best tangential to the plot. It has no direct effect on what happens in the story, so it's piling on sad for the sake of sad. And oddly enough, that makes a story less sad, as it's obvious you're grabbing for easy emotions, so it takes power away from the legitimately sad parts.

>which was about a year later//

So she's apparently in the habit of forgetting about her diary for long stretches? This really brings into doubt that it means anything to her at all.

>something…but//

There are a few forms that ellipsis can take, like… this or … this or . . . this. In any case, you at least need a space after it.

>99%//

Write it out.

>they were flying through the clouds together at a leisurely pace//

Begs the question of who took the photo, but that's a minor thing.

>filling in all the bits and pieces that she could remember of her life//

By completely skipping any of these anecdotes, you're not drawing me into this situation. For me to care about their friendship, I have to know what it means to her, but she's glossing it over.

>Wonderbolt's//

Wonderbolts'

>scanning the sky her cyan, rainbow-maned friend//

Missing word.

>Pony Cancer Rally//

Okay, you are actually tying this in. But it's a little clumsy. This isn't something Dash suddenly cares about. Wouldn't she have supported the cause all along, even back when she lived in Ponyville? If Fluttershy truly inspired her to do this, why did Dash never make an effort to let her know?

>Rainbow Dash looked sad//

There's a section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. Basically, if the emotion is important to the story or character, get me to deduce it from her behavior. Don't just tell me what it is, because that doesn't carry any weight. And this speech just reinforces my point. Dash is going on about this mare whom she respects and counts as a great friend, yet never found the wherewithal to tell Fluttershy any of this? And Fluttershy already noted how Dash hates speaking in public. So she can tell lots of strangers all about this, but not Fluttershy herself? This isn't especially personal info or anything Dash would find embarrassing.

>we think Derpy might have put them in the wrong mailbox//

And whoever got the letters just threw them away? That doesn't sound reasonable.

In all, this is very much like a whole lot of other stories we get. It needs to do something different to stand out. If these two really meant this much to each other, why wouldn't they have made more of an effort to see each other? And unless this is another scenario where everyone left town, Dash would have more of a reason than just Fluttershy to visit. Cloudsdale isn't even that far away.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not eager to get going but not too upset about leaving behind her cottage on the edge of Ponyville//</span><br />This really begs illustration. For one, it&#039;s the heart of your story, and for another, you need to capture the reader&#039;s emotions here at the beginning. She does go on to recall how everyone left town, which works to this end, but it&#039;s all a bit vague, especially this bit. A few one-sentence reminiscences brought on by keepsakes she sees lying around, for example, would really create the mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(Fluttershy had heard a lot about her in all the magazines at the spa.)//</span><br />There isn&#039;t really a reason to put this in parentheses. It works fine a narration, and parentheses work better in a first-person narration, anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;2//</span><br />Write out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she looked down at the key she had strung on a cord around her neck, which she had also forgotten was there//</span><br />So a key had been hanging around her neck for the last two years, and she never noticed it was there? That&#039;s awfully plot-convenient, to the point of being absurd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She doesn&#039;t pay me much attention//</span><br />Very similar phrasing to something you wrote just two paragraphs back. It feels repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a stammered, &#039;I-I&#039;//</span><br />When you&#039;re presenting it as a generic object and not specifically as speech, the rules change a bit. In short, you don&#039;t need that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all the support I can get just to get through the day//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;get.&quot; It wouldn&#039;t be hard to rephrase this to avoid it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taunting and teasing and jokes at her expense, which had definitely increased after her mother had died from cancer//</span><br />Two big problems here. First, having the teasing increase after her mother died? These kids are really scum. I mean to the point of not being believable in canon Equestria. If you want to build a gritter world, then more power to you, but unless you do that, I can&#039;t seen any kids doing that. Second, there&#039;s no reason to have her mother die of cancer. It&#039;s at best tangential to the plot. It has no direct effect on what happens in the story, so it&#039;s piling on sad for the sake of sad. And oddly enough, that makes a story less sad, as it&#039;s obvious you&#039;re grabbing for easy emotions, so it takes power away from the legitimately sad parts. <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which was about a year later//</span><br />So she&#039;s apparently in the habit of forgetting about her diary for long stretches? This really brings into doubt that it means anything to her at all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something…but//</span><br />There are a few forms that ellipsis can take, like… this or … this or . . . this. In any case, you at least need a space after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;99%//</span><br />Write it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they were flying through the clouds together at a leisurely pace//</span><br />Begs the question of who took the photo, but that&#039;s a minor thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;filling in all the bits and pieces that she could remember of her life//</span><br />By completely skipping any of these anecdotes, you&#039;re not drawing me into this situation. For me to care about their friendship, I have to know what it means to her, but she&#039;s glossing it over.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wonderbolt&#039;s//</span><br />Wonderbolts&#039;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scanning the sky her cyan, rainbow-maned friend//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pony Cancer Rally//</span><br />Okay, you are actually tying this in. But it&#039;s a little clumsy. This isn&#039;t something Dash suddenly cares about. Wouldn&#039;t she have supported the cause all along, even back when she lived in Ponyville? If Fluttershy truly inspired her to do this, why did Dash never make an effort to let her know?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash looked sad//</span><br />There&#039;s a section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread. Basically, if the emotion is important to the story or character, get me to deduce it from her behavior. Don&#039;t just tell me what it is, because that doesn&#039;t carry any weight. And this speech just reinforces my point. Dash is going on about this mare whom she respects and counts as a great friend, yet never found the wherewithal to tell Fluttershy any of this? And Fluttershy already noted how Dash hates speaking in public. So she can tell lots of strangers all about this, but not Fluttershy herself? This isn&#039;t especially personal info or anything Dash would find embarrassing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we think Derpy might have put them in the wrong mailbox//</span><br />And whoever got the letters just threw them away? That doesn&#039;t sound reasonable.<br /><br />In all, this is very much like a whole lot of other stories we get. It needs to do something different to stand out. If these two really meant this much to each other, why wouldn&#039;t they have made more of an effort to see each other? And unless this is another scenario where everyone left town, Dash would have more of a reason than just Fluttershy to visit. Cloudsdale isn&#039;t even that far away.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 211

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>in middle of wilderness//
In the middle of the wilderness.

>we know//

Since your story doesn't use a first-person narrator, I'd caution you about introducing elements of one in the synopsis.

>befallen on Equestria//

You don't use an "on" in this phrasing.

Story:
>He is powerful//
Given that Equestrian society seems to be female-dominant, I'm surprised he'd assume this figure was male.

>It’s stopped by the body a pegasus mare yellow as wheat bathing in the light of the summer sun.//

"the body of," and you'd need either an "as" or a comma after "mare."

>He doesn’t hear nor see her collapse to the ground.//

Then how does he know she did? Your narrator has been pretty deep in this character's perspective, so to back out to an omniscient view for a single sentence feels out of place.

>What comes to my name//

Usual phrasing ls "when it comes to."

>this headache is worse than at the time//

Remove the "at."

>moistness forming in his armpits//

I don't think that's a place on horses that's particularly susceptible to sweating.

>Twilight's voice trails away into silence.//

The punctuation already tells me this.

>He can’t sense nor here movement near him.//

Hear/here confusion.

>Silence descents in the room//

descends.

>No…the//

Watch your ellipses. Unless they start a sentence or have punctuation after them, they at least need a space after them. The typical systems are… this, … this, and . . . this.

>He sighs in relief, and stands up.//

Unneeded comma.

>tells the stallion to himself//

the stallion tells himself

>Only the elderly mare shows signs of feelings other than angst and insecurity. In her clouded eyes that have not seen the sun nor the moon for over a decade, a sense of rage resides.//

You're trying to create a visual, but by just telling me the emotion, I don't actually know how this looks.

>making the foals cover deeper behind their parents’ legs//

I think you probably meant "cower."

>His husband and the three foals nod at her words.//

"Her" husband, yes?

>The father smiles at them faintly//

Looks like an unintentional line break here.

>Third crash//

A third crash

>Berryfer glances up at his mother, and sees the flash of doubt in her eyes.//

Unneeded comma.

>Perplexion covers her face.//

Let me see this, not just get the narrator's conclusion about it.

>crabs her ankle//

"Grabs," yes?

>Arch Fright//

Please do a search and replace for this through all chapters. I pointed this out last time. You're inconsistent at spelling his name.

>Her face is a mask of contempt and cool anger.//

You're doing this a bit too much. There's a section at the top of this thread about "show versus tell." You need to let me see their behavior and lead me to the emotions you want to get across instead of simply stating them.

>Do your aerobics or whatever on your own time; we got some questions for you.//

A semicolon strikes me as a bit highbrow for Dash's dialogue.

>how are they going to react when they hear that I don’t have anything for them.//

That's a question, isn't it?

>casually laying on their stomachs//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Needs to be kept an eye on.//

Odd phrasing.

>flapping her wings one metre off the ground//

This says her wings are a metre up, not that she is.

>laying on her stomach on the carpet//

Lay/lie confusion.

>more safe//

safer

>a theatre//

Odd phrasing.

>The bliss of void//

the void

>You can’t just–.//

Don't put a period after a dash.

>cloack//

cloak

>“How can it be misty this time of the year,” asks the mare quietly while closing her eyes.//

It's a question.

>His aimlessly shuffling legs paint random patterns at the dirty plank floor.//

"On," not "at."

>The question stings Arch Freight like a knife.//

You have an odd mixed metaphor there.

>old fashioned//

Hyphenate.

>“That is a good observation. How did you come to make that?”//

I'm not sold on why he speaks so formally. His father is a general, so maybe he comes from an upper-class family, but is he upper-class himself? My read on his occupation wouldn't say so, but I might have it wrong.

>Armor shuns his eyes//

Is that really the word choice you want? It doesn't make sense to me.

>We cannot prolong this any longer.//

That's pretty redundant.

>Supreme Commander, .//

Extraneous space and punctuation.

>yet doesn’t show a speck of the regret that wells up inside him//

How does he know? The scene has been from his perspective, and it's odd for him to make this observation about himself, since he'd be making a judgment call for others.

Regarding formal-sounding speech, Shining Aror also speaks much more formally than he does in canon. It can be explained away, but it does still have to be, well, explained away.

>the entire Canterlot//

"all of Canterlot," or perhaps "the entirety of Canterlot."

>without waiting a response//

Missing a "for."

>She looks each one of them into the eyes//

in the eye

>Let’s cut to the chase then, shall we.//

It's a question.

>It read in the papers we found what you are.//

Awkward phrasing.

>Her!//

You'll normally italicize a ? or ! that's on an italicized word.

>too attractive to be named despise//

Word choice doesn't work here. "Despise" isn't a noun.

This has definitely improved since last time, but there are still a few issues. I'm not necessarily sold on Shining Armor's character voicing, or Arch Freight's for that matter. There's a good amount of telly language in there, too. If it's improved as much as it has this time, I'd tend to say it looks good, but I'd rather have a different pre-reader clear it for posting, someone who can give the full story a read. Once again, due to time constraints, I only made it through the first two chapters. It might help if you gave a more thorough description of your plans for the story in the part of the submission form that asks for the summary. We don't care about spoilers, and nobody outside EqD will ever see what you put there. Namely, you've marked the story as teen for gore, so we'd want to see how bad it gets.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in middle of wilderness//</span><br />In the middle of the wilderness.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we know//</span><br />Since your story doesn&#039;t use a first-person narrator, I&#039;d caution you about introducing elements of one in the synopsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;befallen on Equestria//</span><br />You don&#039;t use an &quot;on&quot; in this phrasing.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He is powerful//</span><br />Given that Equestrian society seems to be female-dominant, I&#039;m surprised he&#039;d assume this figure was male.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s stopped by the body a pegasus mare yellow as wheat bathing in the light of the summer sun.//</span><br />&quot;the body of,&quot; and you&#039;d need either an &quot;as&quot; or a comma after &quot;mare.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He doesn’t hear nor see her collapse to the ground.//</span><br />Then how does he know she did? Your narrator has been pretty deep in this character&#039;s perspective, so to back out to an omniscient view for a single sentence feels out of place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What comes to my name//</span><br />Usual phrasing ls &quot;when it comes to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this headache is worse than at the time//</span><br />Remove the &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;moistness forming in his armpits//</span><br />I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a place on horses that&#039;s particularly susceptible to sweating.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight&#039;s voice trails away into silence.//</span><br />The punctuation already tells me this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He can’t sense nor here movement near him.//</span><br />Hear/here confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silence descents in the room//</span><br />descends.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No…the//</span><br />Watch your ellipses. Unless they start a sentence or have punctuation after them, they at least need a space after them. The typical systems are… this, … this, and . . . this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He sighs in relief, and stands up.//</span><br />Unneeded comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tells the stallion to himself//</span><br />the stallion tells himself<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Only the elderly mare shows signs of feelings other than angst and insecurity. In her clouded eyes that have not seen the sun nor the moon for over a decade, a sense of rage resides.//</span><br />You&#039;re trying to create a visual, but by just telling me the emotion, I don&#039;t actually know how this looks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;making the foals cover deeper behind their parents’ legs//</span><br />I think you probably meant &quot;cower.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His husband and the three foals nod at her words.//</span><br />&quot;Her&quot; husband, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The father smiles at them faintly//</span><br />Looks like an unintentional line break here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Third crash//</span><br />A third crash<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berryfer glances up at his mother, and sees the flash of doubt in her eyes.//</span><br />Unneeded comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Perplexion covers her face.//</span><br />Let me see this, not just get the narrator&#039;s conclusion about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crabs her ankle//</span><br />&quot;Grabs,&quot; yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Arch Fright//</span><br />Please do a search and replace for this through all chapters. I pointed this out last time. You&#039;re inconsistent at spelling his name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her face is a mask of contempt and cool anger.//</span><br />You&#039;re doing this a bit too much. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread about &quot;show versus tell.&quot; You need to let me see their behavior and lead me to the emotions you want to get across instead of simply stating them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do your aerobics or whatever on your own time; we got some questions for you.//</span><br />A semicolon strikes me as a bit highbrow for Dash&#039;s dialogue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;how are they going to react when they hear that I don’t have anything for them.//</span><br />That&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;casually laying on their stomachs//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Needs to be kept an eye on.//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flapping her wings one metre off the ground//</span><br />This says her wings are a metre up, not that she is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying on her stomach on the carpet//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;more safe//</span><br />safer<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a theatre//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The bliss of void//</span><br />the void<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You can’t just–.//</span><br />Don&#039;t put a period after a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cloack//</span><br />cloak<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“How can it be misty this time of the year,” asks the mare quietly while closing her eyes.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His aimlessly shuffling legs paint random patterns at the dirty plank floor.//</span><br />&quot;On,&quot; not &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The question stings Arch Freight like a knife.//</span><br />You have an odd mixed metaphor there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;old fashioned//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That is a good observation. How did you come to make that?”//</span><br />I&#039;m not sold on why he speaks so formally. His father is a general, so maybe he comes from an upper-class family, but is he upper-class himself? My read on his occupation wouldn&#039;t say so, but I might have it wrong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Armor shuns his eyes//</span><br />Is that really the word choice you want? It doesn&#039;t make sense to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We cannot prolong this any longer.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Supreme Commander, .//</span><br />Extraneous space and punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yet doesn’t show a speck of the regret that wells up inside him//</span><br />How does he know? The scene has been from his perspective, and it&#039;s odd for him to make this observation about himself, since he&#039;d be making a judgment call for others.<br /><br />Regarding formal-sounding speech, Shining Aror also speaks much more formally than he does in canon. It can be explained away, but it does still have to be, well, explained away.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the entire Canterlot//</span><br />&quot;all of Canterlot,&quot; or perhaps &quot;the entirety of Canterlot.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;without waiting a response//</span><br />Missing a &quot;for.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looks each one of them into the eyes//</span><br />in the eye<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Let’s cut to the chase then, shall we.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It read in the papers we found what you are.//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her!//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally italicize a ? or ! that&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;too attractive to be named despise//</span><br />Word choice doesn&#039;t work here. &quot;Despise&quot; isn&#039;t a noun.<br /><br />This has definitely improved since last time, but there are still a few issues. I&#039;m not necessarily sold on Shining Armor&#039;s character voicing, or Arch Freight&#039;s for that matter. There&#039;s a good amount of telly language in there, too. If it&#039;s improved as much as it has this time, I&#039;d tend to say it looks good, but I&#039;d rather have a different pre-reader clear it for posting, someone who can give the full story a read. Once again, due to time constraints, I only made it through the first two chapters. It might help if you gave a more thorough description of your plans for the story in the part of the submission form that asks for the summary. We don&#039;t care about spoilers, and nobody outside EqD will ever see what you put there. Namely, you&#039;ve marked the story as teen for gore, so we&#039;d want to see how bad it gets.<br />

StankuCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 212

>>130406
Okay, thanks again for the help.

It felt to me that Armor would speak more formaly in a company of fellow military officers, especially when he played the role of their superior. After all, we haven't really seen how he'd act in such a situation in the show. But I'll see that the issue is addressed. And maybe Arch Freight could loosen up a bit, too.

There was this one sentence in your message that I didn't quite understand:

"If it's improved as much as it has this time, I'd tend to say it looks good, but I'd rather have a different pre-reader clear it for posting, someone who can give the full story a read."

What exactly are you referring to here?

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130406" onclick="return highlight('130406', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130406">&gt;&gt;130406</a><br />Okay, thanks again for the help. <br /><br />It felt to me that Armor would speak more formaly in a company of fellow military officers, especially when he played the role of their superior. After all, we haven&#039;t really seen how he&#039;d act in such a situation in the show. But I&#039;ll see that the issue is addressed. And maybe Arch Freight could loosen up a bit, too. <br /><br />There was this one sentence in your message that I didn&#039;t quite understand:<br /><br />&quot;If it&#039;s improved as much as it has this time, I&#039;d tend to say it looks good, but I&#039;d rather have a different pre-reader clear it for posting, someone who can give the full story a read.&quot;<br /><br />What exactly are you referring to here?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 213

>>130411
It means that your story improved a lot since the last time you submitted it, and if it improves that much again, it stands a good chance of being posted. But I won't be the one making that determination. Since I tend not to grab stories this long, I'll leave it for someone who can quickly read the whole thing instead of taking several days to do it myself. Most pre-readers won't give you this amount of feedback, so I wanted to help as much as I could, but I think you're getting to the point with this story that you don't need it anymore.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130411" onclick="return highlight('130411', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130411">&gt;&gt;130411</a><br />It means that your story improved a lot since the last time you submitted it, and if it improves that much again, it stands a good chance of being posted. But I won&#039;t be the one making that determination. Since I tend not to grab stories this long, I&#039;ll leave it for someone who can quickly read the whole thing instead of taking several days to do it myself. Most pre-readers won&#039;t give you this amount of feedback, so I wanted to help as much as I could, but I think you&#039;re getting to the point with this story that you don&#039;t need it anymore.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 214

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>turn for the worst//
The standard phrasing is "worse."

Story:
>say, “hey//
Dialogue capitalization.

>I hope this doesn’t get as awkward as I think it will.//

Feels a tad repetitive, as Lily had just used that word.

>Why ponies were so ecstatic over the romantic lives of complete strangers, she was quite comfortable never understanding.//

I gave you a pass in the opening letter, since it's reasonable for that, but you're giving me an awful ot of "to be" verbs early on in this story. this is only your second paragraph since the letter, and there are five here, though confined to only two sentences. At least that arrangement suggests it may be necessary as that's typically how mine end up if there's just no other good way of phrasing something, but consider giving it a shot. They're inherently boring verbs, so right at the beginning, where you're trying to grab the reader's interest, isn't a good place for them.

>sky blue//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>Celestia’s sun//

This is an incredibly cliched phrase that will draw an instant eye-roll from readers who hope for more than MOAR FEELS!!!! from a story.

>The Edge of Glory inn and tavern//

Wouldn't "inn and tavern" be part of the place's name, and hence capitalized? I mean, it's your invention, and you can call it what you like, but tacking it on in that manner sure gives it that connotation, as it doesn't feel like something anyone would naturally say on their own.

>the best place to see the sun set and a lover’s getaway//

The phrasing is mismatched here, as the two items in the list require different things of the verb. It sounds like it's a good place to see a lover's getaway. "the best place to see the sun set and find a lover’s getaway" would work, for example.

>give-away//

giveaway

>Get fresh with me again and you can say goodbye to your teeth!//

You have two clauses here, so put a comma between them. There's an explanation at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

>polished wood and shelves and shelves//

I'd suggest a comma after "wood" to differentiate the function of the two "and"s.

>rough and tumble//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>snow white//

Hyphenate.

>bowtie//

Preferred spelling is two words.

>quickly cantering over//

How big is this bar that she has enough space to get up to a canter? That's like running across a bar. How often do you actually see people do that?

>she greeted//

"Greet" is a transitive verb. It needs a direct object.

>sea green//

Hyphenate.

>bayou//

I applaud you for not going overboard with a visual accent, but I'm not seeing any word choice yet that would evoke this. We'll see how it goes.

>in a hushed whisper//

Unless the quote is very short, it's best to put things like this that change how I hear it up front. My default is to hear it in a normal speaking voice, unless the punctuation or earlier dialogue/narration suggests otherwise. So when I finish the quote, I now learn that I was supposed to hear it as a whisper. Then a reader will have to reread the dialogue, which disrupts the story's flow, take it in as a fact without rereading the dialogue, which reduces its effectiveness, or ignore it, which changes the impact.

>sea green//

You just used that descriptor for her mane a few paragraphs back. It's repetitive.

>Lily said with a giggle//

And "giggled" was the speaking verb you ued for her previous instance of dialogue. Repetitive.

>Oh, if only he knew where that horn’s been//

Equestria Daily has a strict policy against horn and wing play. This toes the line, so I brought it up with other pre-readers. We agreed that it's a little over the line, unless it's so integral to the story that taking it out would harm things. But Lily is just trying to playfully embarrass Cadance here, and she wouldn't have to get quite this personal to do so. As a result, we'll have to ask you to tone this down.

>Actually-//

Please use a dash for a cutoff.

>even her taste in alcohol has changed//

Tense change.

>Her horn glowed along with her glass, raising it to her lips and sipping some down.//

I haven't bugged you about a few potential misplaced modifiers, but this one's genuinely a dangling participle. "Raising it to her lips and sipping some down" describes Cadance, but she doesn't appear in the sentence; her horn and lips do, neither of which could perform this action.

>“No problem, sugar,” Lily smiled back.//

That's really questionable as a speaking verb. How do you smile a word? It doesn't imply any sound.

>as if anyone was//

Not an error, but possibly an oversight of using "anypony." But for hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: as if anyone were.

>a small, sexualized, romanticized hole//

This is a bit troubling. It implies a huge amount of world-building and public attitudes toward the princesses that the story just does not support. And frankly, with what Lily has been saying, how is she any different?

>Lily said with a smile//

Look at this and the previous two dialogue attributions. See the repetitive structure?

>ma//

Using it basically as a name (as opposed to a more generic use, like "my ma") requires capitalization.

>small town//

Hyphenate.

>break up//

Breakup or break-up.

>Cadance assured//

Another transitive verb which requires a direct object.

>Cadance giggled//

These laughing verbs make poor speaking actions anyway, but you're really using them a lot. They're best used sparingly anyway, but you're crossing the line to being outright repetitive. For instance, when you use "giggle," you tend to do it 3 or 4 times within the same page, so I really notice the repetition.

>sea green eyes//

You've already told us what color her eyes are. We're not learning anything new about her.

>but-//

Dash.

>She gasped happily//

It's not clear who's doing his, since you mentioned them both in the previous sentence.

>you-//

Dash.

>Cadance let out a giggle and followed suit//

Yet another giggle. But the real issue here: scroll so that this line is at the bottom of your screen. Then look back up at the first word of each paragraph, even scroll back up a bit. It's another type of repetition.

>dre-//

Dash.

>Cadance was cut off//

Yes, I could tell from the punctuation. Besides being redundant, the fact that the narrator can wedge this comment in between the actual cutoff and the event causing it undercuts its suddenness.

>ears laying low//

Lay/lie confusion.

>but for what’s coming//

Comma needed to separate the clauses.

>crying.”//

Since the next paragraph immediately begins with more of her dialogue, you don't need these closing quotation marks.

>to just be the one that//

Cadance is a "whom," not a "that."

>She scoffed//

Second use of this word in as many paragraphs. The more unusual a word, the longer you have to go before repeating it before it gets noticeable.

>"Look how that dream turned out.”//

Different people will tell you different things, but you don't want to bounce back and forth between dialogue and narration too many times in a single paragraph. I usually keep it to two, maybe three at the outside, but you have five in this one.

>for my children and I//

Many people swing the pendulum too far the other way and use "I" where "me" is actually appropriate. It's an object of the preposition "for," so it would use the objective case. To illustrate, make it plural. Would you say "for we" or "for us"?

>“Please don’t hurt him,” she pleaded//

Redundant.

>I’ll just lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>false romantic farces//

Redundant.

>and when they were gone//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>There were no sound//

Number agreement.

>and I could swear she was making passes at me//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>conniving-//

Dash.

>She really did used to mean a lot to me//

She's pretty much repeating word-for-word what he just said.

>“I understand,” he whispered, nudging his nose against hers with a sad smile.//

Look back at how often lately you've used the construction of "Speech," X said, participle.

>if I saw you unhappy on the altar.//

Well… she's not going to be on the altar, right? That would imply a much more disturbing ritual.

I was waiting for you to have Chrysalis acquiesce to Cadance's request to spare Shining Armor, and here's why: Chrysalis says in A Canterlot Wedding that she intends to keep Shining in a trance indefinitely so she can harvest the love from him. Yet you have her plotting to kill him. Why the change? It begs some explanation. While you could go with AU, it seems like you're tying into canon, so that wouldn't work. For that matter, why does she care what a medical examiner would find? By then, she would have already given up her disguise and led the invasion. What difference would it make? Why would there still even be a medical examiner at that point? It implies a functional government, which she'd have to assume would be in a shambles by then.

Anyway, having her give in (and explaining a motivation for doing so) might give you a stronger conflict here, as what you mostly have going for you right now is "oh, that's why things turned out the way they did." What has Chrysalis gained by blabbing her plan? She could have just drugged Cadance and left her wondering why. Chrysalis would have some reason for making sure Cadance knew who had beaten her and why. Otherwise, it's the old cliched "villain explains her plans to the hero for no reason, except maybe to gloat." What was at stake? For Chrysalis, the answer is obvious, but the perspective is with Cadance. To use Chrysalis as the stakeholder, we'd have to see her uncertainty of this working and what bad thing would happen if she failed. I'm not sure that would belong here. Or on the character growth side, you could show how one of them changes as a result of this encounter. Cadance really wouldn't. She's opposed to this evil creature, but we can assume she would be anyway. But if we saw Chrysalis change in some way, won over by Cadance's argument, agreeing to some bargain, that might work. I'm not at all saying this is the best direction for your story. It's just an idea to illustrate the kinds of things that move a story forward. Now, you do have Cadance potentially getting into a situation where she would be tempted to cheat, but she never actually gets there. As soon as it starts heading that way, we get the big reveal, so she never actually faces a decision.

The biggest problem here was repetition, and I pointed out several kinds: word, sentence structure, choice of unsual speaking verb. One I'll look at in a little more detail is the "to be" verb. Here are your counts for the easier forms to search on:
was/wasn't: 54, were/weren't: 18, are/aren't: 7, is/isn't: 8, be/been/being: 53.
That's a rate of almost one every other sentence, and as I said, this count wouldn't have even caught them all. Consider that this is how often something isn't happening in the story. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should try to choose more active verbs.

You use a number of questionable and unusual speaking verbs, which causes two problems. First, the ones akin to laughing are weak anyway, but also get repetitive. Second, at some point, they call attention to themselves. They're nice here and there for flavor, but when they steal attention from the speech itself because the reader notices you're doing it so much, that's a problem, namely saidisms. There are a few bland speaking verbs that just blend in and pass by unnoticed, like asked, answered, said. You have about 150 quotes in your story, but only use "said" 17 times. That's not awful, but it does reinforce the point that I became very aware of your speaking verbs more so than the dialogue. I usually try to aim for a good balance of plain speaking verbs, unusual ones, and unattributed dialogue.

However, this was a well-written story overall, and I could see it getting posted on the blog. I'm a little stumped at the number of downvotes it's gotten.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;turn for the worst//</span><br />The standard phrasing is &quot;worse.&quot;<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;say, “hey//</span><br />Dialogue capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hope this doesn’t get as awkward as I think it will.//</span><br />Feels a tad repetitive, as Lily had just used that word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why ponies were so ecstatic over the romantic lives of complete strangers, she was quite comfortable never understanding.//</span><br />I gave you a pass in the opening letter, since it&#039;s reasonable for that, but you&#039;re giving me an awful ot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs early on in this story. this is only your second paragraph since the letter, and there are five here, though confined to only two sentences. At least that arrangement suggests it may be necessary as that&#039;s typically how mine end up if there&#039;s just no other good way of phrasing something, but consider giving it a shot. They&#039;re inherently boring verbs, so right at the beginning, where you&#039;re trying to grab the reader&#039;s interest, isn&#039;t a good place for them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sky blue//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia’s sun//</span><br />This is an incredibly cliched phrase that will draw an instant eye-roll from readers who hope for more than MOAR FEELS!!!! from a story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Edge of Glory inn and tavern//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t &quot;inn and tavern&quot; be part of the place&#039;s name, and hence capitalized? I mean, it&#039;s your invention, and you can call it what you like, but tacking it on in that manner sure gives it that connotation, as it doesn&#039;t feel like something anyone would naturally say on their own.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the best place to see the sun set and a lover’s getaway//</span><br />The phrasing is mismatched here, as the two items in the list require different things of the verb. It sounds like it&#039;s a good place to see a lover&#039;s getaway. &quot;the best place to see the sun set and find a lover’s getaway&quot; would work, for example.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;give-away//</span><br />giveaway<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Get fresh with me again and you can say goodbye to your teeth!//</span><br />You have two clauses here, so put a comma between them. There&#039;s an explanation at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;polished wood and shelves and shelves//</span><br />I&#039;d suggest a comma after &quot;wood&quot; to differentiate the function of the two &quot;and&quot;s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rough and tumble//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;snow white//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bowtie//</span><br />Preferred spelling is two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quickly cantering over//</span><br />How big is this bar that she has enough space to get up to a canter? That&#039;s like running across a bar. How often do you actually see people do that?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she greeted//</span><br />&quot;Greet&quot; is a transitive verb. It needs a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sea green//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bayou//</span><br />I applaud you for not going overboard with a visual accent, but I&#039;m not seeing any word choice yet that would evoke this. We&#039;ll see how it goes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in a hushed whisper//</span><br />Unless the quote is very short, it&#039;s best to put things like this that change how I hear it up front. My default is to hear it in a normal speaking voice, unless the punctuation or earlier dialogue/narration suggests otherwise. So when I finish the quote, I now learn that I was supposed to hear it as a whisper. Then a reader will have to reread the dialogue, which disrupts the story&#039;s flow, take it in as a fact without rereading the dialogue, which reduces its effectiveness, or ignore it, which changes the impact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sea green//</span><br />You just used that descriptor for her mane a few paragraphs back. It&#039;s repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily said with a giggle//</span><br />And &quot;giggled&quot; was the speaking verb you ued for her previous instance of dialogue. Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, if only he knew where that horn’s been//</span><br />Equestria Daily has a strict policy against horn and wing play. This toes the line, so I brought it up with other pre-readers. We agreed that it&#039;s a little over the line, unless it&#039;s so integral to the story that taking it out would harm things. But Lily is just trying to playfully embarrass Cadance here, and she wouldn&#039;t have to get quite this personal to do so. As a result, we&#039;ll have to ask you to tone this down.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Actually-//</span><br />Please use a dash for a cutoff.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even her taste in alcohol has changed//</span><br />Tense change.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her horn glowed along with her glass, raising it to her lips and sipping some down.//</span><br />I haven&#039;t bugged you about a few potential misplaced modifiers, but this one&#039;s genuinely a dangling participle. &quot;Raising it to her lips and sipping some down&quot; describes Cadance, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the sentence; her horn and lips do, neither of which could perform this action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“No problem, sugar,” Lily smiled back.//</span><br />That&#039;s really questionable as a speaking verb. How do you smile a word? It doesn&#039;t imply any sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as if anyone was//</span><br />Not an error, but possibly an oversight of using &quot;anypony.&quot; But for hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: as if anyone were.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a small, sexualized, romanticized hole//</span><br />This is a bit troubling. It implies a huge amount of world-building and public attitudes toward the princesses that the story just does not support. And frankly, with what Lily has been saying, how is she any different?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily said with a smile//</span><br />Look at this and the previous two dialogue attributions. See the repetitive structure?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ma//</span><br />Using it basically as a name (as opposed to a more generic use, like &quot;my ma&quot;) requires capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;small town//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;break up//</span><br />Breakup or break-up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadance assured//</span><br />Another transitive verb which requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadance giggled//</span><br />These laughing verbs make poor speaking actions anyway, but you&#039;re really using them a lot. They&#039;re best used sparingly anyway, but you&#039;re crossing the line to being outright repetitive. For instance, when you use &quot;giggle,&quot; you tend to do it 3 or 4 times within the same page, so I really notice the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sea green eyes//</span><br />You&#039;ve already told us what color her eyes are. We&#039;re not learning anything new about her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but-//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She gasped happily//</span><br />It&#039;s not clear who&#039;s doing his, since you mentioned them both in the previous sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you-//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadance let out a giggle and followed suit//</span><br />Yet another giggle. But the real issue here: scroll so that this line is at the bottom of your screen. Then look back up at the first word of each paragraph, even scroll back up a bit. It&#039;s another type of repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dre-//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadance was cut off//</span><br />Yes, I could tell from the punctuation. Besides being redundant, the fact that the narrator can wedge this comment in between the actual cutoff and the event causing it undercuts its suddenness.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ears laying low//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but for what’s coming//</span><br />Comma needed to separate the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crying.”//</span><br />Since the next paragraph immediately begins with more of her dialogue, you don&#039;t need these closing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to just be the one that//</span><br />Cadance is a &quot;whom,&quot; not a &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She scoffed//</span><br />Second use of this word in as many paragraphs. The more unusual a word, the longer you have to go before repeating it before it gets noticeable.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Look how that dream turned out.”//</span><br />Different people will tell you different things, but you don&#039;t want to bounce back and forth between dialogue and narration too many times in a single paragraph. I usually keep it to two, maybe three at the outside, but you have five in this one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for my children and I//</span><br />Many people swing the pendulum too far the other way and use &quot;I&quot; where &quot;me&quot; is actually appropriate. It&#039;s an object of the preposition &quot;for,&quot; so it would use the objective case. To illustrate, make it plural. Would you say &quot;for we&quot; or &quot;for us&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Please don’t hurt him,” she pleaded//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ll just lay down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;false romantic farces//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when they were gone//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There were no sound//</span><br />Number agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and I could swear she was making passes at me//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;conniving-//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She really did used to mean a lot to me//</span><br />She&#039;s pretty much repeating word-for-word what he just said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I understand,” he whispered, nudging his nose against hers with a sad smile.//</span><br />Look back at how often lately you&#039;ve used the construction of &quot;Speech,&quot; X said, participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if I saw you unhappy on the altar.//</span><br />Well… she&#039;s not going to be <i>on</i> the altar, right? That would imply a much more disturbing ritual.<br /><br />I was waiting for you to have Chrysalis acquiesce to Cadance&#039;s request to spare Shining Armor, and here&#039;s why: Chrysalis says in A Canterlot Wedding that she intends to keep Shining in a trance indefinitely so she can harvest the love from him. Yet you have her plotting to kill him. Why the change? It begs some explanation. While you could go with AU, it seems like you&#039;re tying into canon, so that wouldn&#039;t work. For that matter, why does she care what a medical examiner would find? By then, she would have already given up her disguise and led the invasion. What difference would it make? Why would there still even be a medical examiner at that point? It implies a functional government, which she&#039;d have to assume would be in a shambles by then.<br /><br />Anyway, having her give in (and explaining a motivation for doing so) might give you a stronger conflict here, as what you mostly have going for you right now is &quot;oh, that&#039;s why things turned out the way they did.&quot; What has Chrysalis gained by blabbing her plan? She could have just drugged Cadance and left her wondering why. Chrysalis would have some reason for making sure Cadance knew who had beaten her and why. Otherwise, it&#039;s the old cliched &quot;villain explains her plans to the hero for no reason, except maybe to gloat.&quot; What was at stake? For Chrysalis, the answer is obvious, but the perspective is with Cadance. To use Chrysalis as the stakeholder, we&#039;d have to see her uncertainty of this working and what bad thing would happen if she failed. I&#039;m not sure that would belong here. Or on the character growth side, you could show how one of them changes as a result of this encounter. Cadance really wouldn&#039;t. She&#039;s opposed to this evil creature, but we can assume she would be anyway. But if we saw Chrysalis change in some way, won over by Cadance&#039;s argument, agreeing to some bargain, that might work. I&#039;m not at all saying this is the best direction for your story. It&#039;s just an idea to illustrate the kinds of things that move a story forward. Now, you do have Cadance potentially getting into a situation where she would be tempted to cheat, but she never actually gets there. As soon as it starts heading that way, we get the big reveal, so she never actually faces a decision.<br /><br />The biggest problem here was repetition, and I pointed out several kinds: word, sentence structure, choice of unsual speaking verb. One I&#039;ll look at in a little more detail is the &quot;to be&quot; verb. Here are your counts for the easier forms to search on:<br />was/wasn&#039;t: 54, were/weren&#039;t: 18, are/aren&#039;t: 7, is/isn&#039;t: 8, be/been/being: 53.<br />That&#039;s a rate of almost one every other sentence, and as I said, this count wouldn&#039;t have even caught them all. Consider that this is how often something <i>isn&#039;t</i> happening in the story. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should try to choose more active verbs.<br /><br />You use a number of questionable and unusual speaking verbs, which causes two problems. First, the ones akin to laughing are weak anyway, but also get repetitive. Second, at some point, they call attention to themselves. They&#039;re nice here and there for flavor, but when they steal attention from the speech itself because the reader notices you&#039;re doing it so much, that&#039;s a problem, namely saidisms. There are a few bland speaking verbs that just blend in and pass by unnoticed, like asked, answered, said. You have about 150 quotes in your story, but only use &quot;said&quot; 17 times. That&#039;s not awful, but it does reinforce the point that I became very aware of your speaking verbs more so than the dialogue. I usually try to aim for a good balance of plain speaking verbs, unusual ones, and unattributed dialogue.<br /><br />However, this was a well-written story overall, and I could see it getting posted on the blog. I&#039;m a little stumped at the number of downvotes it&#039;s gotten.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 215

>because that very morning. Apple Bloom and Sweetie Belle had managed//
Why is that period there? To proudly proclaim who pre-read ,and then have this in the first paragraph… ;-)

>After all, when you’re trying to enjoy your meal at Sugarcube Corner, the last thing you want is a foal screaming at the top of her lungs and running in circles for no reason whatsoever right next to you.//

It's worth avoiding having the narrator address me directly, unless he's going to make a habit of it.

>let’em//

Missing space.

>blame’em//

Why are you running 'em into other words as a contraction? It's an elision.

>of’er//

Same deal.

>snortled//

What is this?

>three hour//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>Twilight took another sip.//

I've already seen this or something nearly identical to it 3 or 4 times, and I'm barely two screens in. Watch the repetition.

>Smack!//

It's preferred to keep sound effect out of narration. Better to describe it.

>…Yeah, I see your point.//

You're using these leading ellipses a lot, but they have a specific purpose: 1) the speaker is just becoming audible because they're getting nearer to the listener, the listener is waking up, etc., or 2) the speaker is completing a sentence that they had previously left hanging. You don't have either here.

>she informed//

This is a transitive verb and requires a direct object.

>Sweetie Belle just ran face-first onto the only tree for miles.//

Surely you meant "into." Otherwise, it wouldn't hurt.

>she’ll be able to work on the fields//

You probably should use "in" here.

>‘bout//

Smart quotes almost always get leading apostrophes backward, like they've done here. Add one after it, then delete the first. You do this a number of times, so be sure to sweep through for it.

>Tell me ‘bout it. Did I tell you about//

Repetitive.

>lil’//

Despite appearing like this in a lot of advertising, the proper spelling is "li'l."

>“Sweetie Belle!” she yelled, “come here for a second!”//

You've capitalized this as if the two parts of the quote make a single spoken sentence, but you've wedged end punctuation in there, so it can't work that way.

>I would try to tell you how smart your sister can be now and then, but right now she’s desperately fighting against the mud puddle and losing. Like, really losing against it. We’re talking crushing defeat here.//

This seems at odds with the work she's done with them during Twilight Time. There's comedic effect, and there's being mean. I don't see Twilight as ever willing to say anyone's dumb, and despite not doing so explicitly here, she's not putting up much of a fight. Plus Sweetie Belle probably has the best vocabulary of them all.

>Ah guess you do have a point in there.//

Lose the "in."

>Ah bet he’ll throw his wife through the window//

This is a really weak joke. It's an obvious reference, but it has no meaning without that. If it carried a double meaning, fine, but it wedges in a episode reference for no more reason than to just have it.

>high height//

Repetitive. You could just remove "high," and it would be fine.

>To Fluttershy’s?//

I'm a little lost as to what's happening here. Is this so they can house-sit for her when she goes to Dash's? You might want to make it clearer.

>will fall down that cloud mansion at least once//

I think there's a missing word in there. "from that cloud mansion" maybe?

This was a fun little story, and you should be good to go after addressing these few things. A couple of last comments, though.

The actions were pretty sparse during a lot of the conversation. For long stretches, I'd see little beyond speaking verbs. This makes a conversation lose its authenticity, besides skimping on all the nonverbal communication that goes on when people talk. And of the actions you did use, a disproportionate number were about them drinking, often in a repetitive manner. You used "sip" 10 times, for example. It very much stuck out to me. And you used three drinking actions for Applejack that were almost identical. Last is the bit about milking the goat. It's fine, in terms of allowable content, but it also sticks out as not fitting with the character of the rest of their conversation. Throwing in a single joke for shock value doesn't work when the rest of the story is so mellow. The conflict is on the weak side, but I like this as a character study, and Twilight does learn some lessons about sisterhood. Though I'll reiterate that she sinks to being derogatory toward the girls, which I don't see as supported by canon. As much eager learners as they are, I don't think she'd be that borderline insulting toward Sweetie Belle. For that matter, canon doesn't support her deliberately running into things and being so clueless about it. While you get some leeway for comedic absurdity, it's problematic to extend that to characters acting in ways that canon wouldn't justify, and Twilight is abiding being outright disrespectful to the girls.

Just submit again when you're ready, and I'll give it a quick scan.<span class="unkfunc">&gt;because that very morning. Apple Bloom and Sweetie Belle had managed//</span><br />Why is that period there? To proudly proclaim who pre-read ,and then have this in the first paragraph… ;-)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After all, when you’re trying to enjoy your meal at Sugarcube Corner, the last thing you want is a foal screaming at the top of her lungs and running in circles for no reason whatsoever right next to you.//</span><br />It&#039;s worth avoiding having the narrator address me directly, unless he&#039;s going to make a habit of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;let’em//</span><br />Missing space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blame’em//</span><br />Why are you running &#039;em into other words as a contraction? It&#039;s an elision.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of’er//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;snortled//</span><br />What is this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;three hour//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight took another sip.//</span><br />I&#039;ve already seen this or something nearly identical to it 3 or 4 times, and I&#039;m barely two screens in. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Smack!</i>//</span><br />It&#039;s preferred to keep sound effect out of narration. Better to describe it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…Yeah, I see your point.//</span><br />You&#039;re using these leading ellipses a lot, but they have a specific purpose: 1) the speaker is just becoming audible because they&#039;re getting nearer to the listener, the listener is waking up, etc., or 2) the speaker is completing a sentence that they had previously left hanging. You don&#039;t have either here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she informed//</span><br />This is a transitive verb and requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle just ran face-first onto the only tree for miles.//</span><br />Surely you meant &quot;into.&quot; Otherwise, it wouldn&#039;t hurt.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she’ll be able to work on the fields//</span><br />You probably should use &quot;in&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘bout//</span><br />Smart quotes almost always get leading apostrophes backward, like they&#039;ve done here. Add one after it, then delete the first. You do this a number of times, so be sure to sweep through for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tell me ‘bout it. Did I tell you about//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lil’//</span><br />Despite appearing like this in a lot of advertising, the proper spelling is &quot;li&#039;l.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Sweetie Belle!” she yelled, “come here for a second!”//</span><br />You&#039;ve capitalized this as if the two parts of the quote make a single spoken sentence, but you&#039;ve wedged end punctuation in there, so it can&#039;t work that way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I would try to tell you how smart your sister can be now and then, but right now she’s desperately fighting against the mud puddle and losing. Like, really losing against it. We’re talking crushing defeat here.//</span><br />This seems at odds with the work she&#039;s done with them during Twilight Time. There&#039;s comedic effect, and there&#039;s being mean. I don&#039;t see Twilight as ever willing to say anyone&#039;s dumb, and despite not doing so explicitly here, she&#039;s not putting up much of a fight. Plus Sweetie Belle probably has the best vocabulary of them all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah guess you do have a point in there.//</span><br />Lose the &quot;in.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah bet he’ll throw his wife through the window//</span><br />This is a really weak joke. It&#039;s an obvious reference, but it has no meaning without that. If it carried a double meaning, fine, but it wedges in a episode reference for no more reason than to just have it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high height//</span><br />Repetitive. You could just remove &quot;high,&quot; and it would be fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To Fluttershy’s?//</span><br />I&#039;m a little lost as to what&#039;s happening here. Is this so they can house-sit for her when she goes to Dash&#039;s? You might want to make it clearer.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;will fall down that cloud mansion at least once//</span><br />I think there&#039;s a missing word in there. &quot;from that cloud mansion&quot; maybe?<br /><br />This was a fun little story, and you should be good to go after addressing these few things. A couple of last comments, though.<br /><br />The actions were pretty sparse during a lot of the conversation. For long stretches, I&#039;d see little beyond speaking verbs. This makes a conversation lose its authenticity, besides skimping on all the nonverbal communication that goes on when people talk. And of the actions you did use, a disproportionate number were about them drinking, often in a repetitive manner. You used &quot;sip&quot; 10 times, for example. It very much stuck out to me. And you used three drinking actions for Applejack that were almost identical. Last is the bit about milking the goat. It&#039;s fine, in terms of allowable content, but it also sticks out as not fitting with the character of the rest of their conversation. Throwing in a single joke for shock value doesn&#039;t work when the rest of the story is so mellow. The conflict is on the weak side, but I like this as a character study, and Twilight does learn some lessons about sisterhood. Though I&#039;ll reiterate that she sinks to being derogatory toward the girls, which I don&#039;t see as supported by canon. As much eager learners as they are, I don&#039;t think she&#039;d be that borderline insulting toward Sweetie Belle. For that matter, canon doesn&#039;t support her deliberately running into things and being so clueless about it. While you get some leeway for comedic absurdity, it&#039;s problematic to extend that to characters acting in ways that canon wouldn&#039;t justify, and Twilight is abiding being outright disrespectful to the girls.<br /><br />Just submit again when you&#039;re ready, and I&#039;ll give it a quick scan.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 216

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

A word about your opening paragraph: it has six "to be" verbs in it. While it's impractical to avoid this verb altogether, you should strive to use more active language where you can. This is an inherently boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. This is especially important at the beginning, where you're trying to grab the reader's interest. It's worth a sweep throughout the story, too.

>Sun…It

At the very least, put a space after the ellipsis (unless it begins a sentence). The accepted formats are… this, and … this, and . . . this.

>down here//

This phrasing indicates he's still in Tartarus, be he's said he's up in Equestria now. Which is it?

>and if I did not flee//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>had changed//

You're using this past perfect tense oddly. There are other applications, but the chief one is to narrate events that take place in the story's past, when it's narrated in past tense. You narrate in present tense, so you should use present perfect tense here (has changed).

>one pair of clothing//

Odd phrasing. And if the guards recognize what he is, why are they letting him pass?

>“State your business,” The unicorn of the two droned while trying to stifle a yawn, “or we will have to ask you to leave.”//

Dialogue capitalization. There's a section on that at the top of this thread. It gives examples of the most common forms. You have recurring problems with this.

>He sighed after a moment and turned to his partner, awaking him with a nudge, “Hey, go get the Captain//

You're punctuating this as an attribution, but you have no speaking verb. You can't just attach any action to dialogue with a comma. You also do this quite a lot.

>mon-I mean-someone//

Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.

>his tail flicked in annoyance//

I've caught you doing this a few times already. There's a section on show versus tell, too, which you should read. In short, get me to see annoyance through how he acts and looks, not just because you told me he was.

>I am no foe…” I lowered my hood, shaking my hair free of the constrainment, “…In fact//

It looks like you're trying to do a narrative aside in a quote. Here's how:
I am no foe—” I lowered my hood, shaking my hair free of the constrainment “—in fact
And I think you wanted "constraint."

>the guards jaws//

Missing an apostrophe.

>my siblings and I were one the few of our kind//

Missing word.

>lower ranked//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>O-Of//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the first part of a stutter.

>He trotted off across the bridge and I followed closely behind//

Needs a comma to separate the clauses.

>Let me check if she is in availible for you.//

Extraneous word, and a typo.

>because when the Captain finally returned//

Another comma needed for a dependent clause.

>I nodded and thanked him, before stepping through the doorframe//

And the opposite case. There is no new clause, so you don't need the comma. And "door frame" is two words.

>a breath I didn’t even know I was holding//

This is a very cliched thing. It broadcasts that you couldn't think of anything original to say.

>She took a sharp inhale//

"Inhale" isn't a noun.

>heart shaped//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>I am suppose to be//

supposed

>I might even have been holding you all back from progression.//

Awkward phrasing.

On a plot note, why has she never tried to escape before? If Cerberus attacks her, so what? She can't die. If she gives it a shot every day for thousands of years, she's bound to make it sometime. While it's certainly not definitive, canon suggests that Celestia knows what's in Tartarus, so it might warrant some explanation as to why she wouldn't know Megan was there. Now, this is just a suggestion, but it might make the story more powerful if we see the beginnings of her getting what she wants. How does it feel? You're very vague with that part—just a "fading away" and her mind becoming "fogged." This should be a huge emotional moment for her, and it goes by very quickly. Really put yourself in her place and imagine all of the complex emotions she's feeling at that moment. Let them all come through, and then show me a little hint of the completion, something like she feels as if she's falling, then the darkness goes away, and she hears a familiar voice calling her name. Again, these are just suggestions, but they're an example of how you could handle this.

You also gloss over this encounter with the Furies that led to her curse. I'll be a lot more invested in her predicament if I know more about how and why that happened, and particularly how she felt about it. I'd expect at the very least plenty of emotional cues from her while recounting the story. It's more difficult to connect with an extensive past like this through narrative summary than by anecdote or flashback, but if that's the direction you want to take, it could work. Though it might feel a little too wedged in to have her enter flashback mode in the midst of her discussion with Celestia. Perhaps it would fit better during her journey there, as that still wouldn't force you to reveal who she is yet.

Even her meeting with Celestia goes by rather quickly. They haven't seen each other in thousands of years, and they can only come up with about a page and a half's worth of things to say to each other?

I'm not entirely sold on the last line. While it's a nice juxtaposition, it suggests that only by going to Hell could she have achieved paradise. But that's not the case, is it? All her loved ones are there, and she presumably would be as well, if she had died normally. I think you're on the edge of having something good to say here, but that's not quite it.

While the plot could use a tune-up, it's really the pervasive mechanical issues and the need for more emotional depth that are the biggest problems. If you don't understand these explanations, please ask or take advantage of the reviewing resources referenced in the Editor's Omnibus, linked at the top of this thread.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />A word about your opening paragraph: it has six &quot;to be&quot; verbs in it. While it&#039;s impractical to avoid this verb altogether, you should strive to use more active language where you can. This is an inherently boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. This is especially important at the beginning, where you&#039;re trying to grab the reader&#039;s interest. It&#039;s worth a sweep throughout the story, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Sun</i>…It</span><br />At the very least, put a space after the ellipsis (unless it begins a sentence). The accepted formats are… this, and … this, and . . . this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;down here//</span><br />This phrasing indicates he&#039;s still in Tartarus, be he&#039;s said he&#039;s up in Equestria now. Which is it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if I did not flee//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;had changed//</span><br />You&#039;re using this past perfect tense oddly. There are other applications, but the chief one is to narrate events that take place in the story&#039;s past, when it&#039;s narrated in past tense. You narrate in present tense, so you should use present perfect tense here (has changed).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one pair of clothing//</span><br />Odd phrasing. And if the guards recognize what he is, why are they letting him pass?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“State your business,” The unicorn of the two droned while trying to stifle a yawn, “or we will have to ask you to leave.”//</span><br />Dialogue capitalization. There&#039;s a section on that at the top of this thread. It gives examples of the most common forms. You have recurring problems with this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He sighed after a moment and turned to his partner, awaking him with a nudge, “Hey, go get the Captain//</span><br />You&#039;re punctuating this as an attribution, but you have no speaking verb. You can&#039;t just attach any action to dialogue with a comma. You also do this quite a lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mon-I mean-<i>someone</i>//</span><br />Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his tail flicked in annoyance//</span><br />I&#039;ve caught you doing this a few times already. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell, too, which you should read. In short, get me to see annoyance through how he acts and looks, not just because you told me he was.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am no foe…” I lowered my hood, shaking my hair free of the constrainment, “…In fact//</span><br />It looks like you&#039;re trying to do a narrative aside in a quote. Here&#039;s how:<br />I am no foe—” I lowered my hood, shaking my hair free of the constrainment “—in fact<br />And I think you wanted &quot;constraint.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the guards jaws//</span><br />Missing an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my siblings and I were one the few of our kind//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lower ranked//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;O-Of//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He trotted off across the bridge and I followed closely behind//</span><br />Needs a comma to separate the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Let me check if she is in availible for you.//</span><br />Extraneous word, and a typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;because when the Captain finally returned//</span><br />Another comma needed for a dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I nodded and thanked him, before stepping through the doorframe//</span><br />And the opposite case. There is no new clause, so you don&#039;t need the comma. And &quot;door frame&quot; is two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a breath I didn’t even know I was holding//</span><br />This is a very cliched thing. It broadcasts that you couldn&#039;t think of anything original to say.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She took a sharp inhale//</span><br />&quot;Inhale&quot; isn&#039;t a noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;heart shaped//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am suppose to be//</span><br />supposed<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I might even have been holding you all back from progression.//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br />On a plot note, why has she never tried to escape before? If Cerberus attacks her, so what? She can&#039;t die. If she gives it a shot every day for thousands of years, she&#039;s bound to make it sometime. While it&#039;s certainly not definitive, canon suggests that Celestia knows what&#039;s in Tartarus, so it might warrant some explanation as to why she wouldn&#039;t know Megan was there. Now, this is just a suggestion, but it might make the story more powerful if we see the beginnings of her getting what she wants. How does it feel? You&#039;re very vague with that part—just a &quot;fading away&quot; and her mind becoming &quot;fogged.&quot; This should be a huge emotional moment for her, and it goes by very quickly. Really put yourself in her place and imagine all of the complex emotions she&#039;s feeling at that moment. Let them all come through, and then show me a little hint of the completion, something like she feels as if she&#039;s falling, then the darkness goes away, and she hears a familiar voice calling her name. Again, these are just suggestions, but they&#039;re an example of how you could handle this.<br /><br />You also gloss over this encounter with the Furies that led to her curse. I&#039;ll be a lot more invested in her predicament if I know more about how and why that happened, and particularly how she felt about it. I&#039;d expect at the very least plenty of emotional cues from her while recounting the story. It&#039;s more difficult to connect with an extensive past like this through narrative summary than by anecdote or flashback, but if that&#039;s the direction you want to take, it could work. Though it might feel a little too wedged in to have her enter flashback mode in the midst of her discussion with Celestia. Perhaps it would fit better during her journey there, as that still wouldn&#039;t force you to reveal who she is yet.<br /><br />Even her meeting with Celestia goes by rather quickly. They haven&#039;t seen each other in thousands of years, and they can only come up with about a page and a half&#039;s worth of things to say to each other?<br /><br />I&#039;m not entirely sold on the last line. While it&#039;s a nice juxtaposition, it suggests that only by going to Hell could she have achieved paradise. But that&#039;s not the case, is it? All her loved ones are there, and she presumably would be as well, if she had died normally. I think you&#039;re on the edge of having something good to say here, but that&#039;s not quite it.<br /><br />While the plot could use a tune-up, it&#039;s really the pervasive mechanical issues and the need for more emotional depth that are the biggest problems. If you don&#039;t understand these explanations, please ask or take advantage of the reviewing resources referenced in the Editor&#039;s Omnibus, linked at the top of this thread.<br />

TheCrystalRingCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 217

>>130488
Thank you for your review. This was written for a WTG, so I did rush it. I wasn't planning on submitting this story originally, and only did so because someone thought I should, so it's not my best work. Thank you regardless.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130488" onclick="return highlight('130488', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130488">&gt;&gt;130488</a><br />Thank you for your review. This was written for a WTG, so I did rush it. I wasn&#039;t planning on submitting this story originally, and only did so because someone thought I should, so it&#039;s not my best work. Thank you regardless.<br />

TheCrystalRingCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 218

<div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Thu, May 22nd, 2014 10:30</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 219

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Nice opening scene. You have my attention.

My second impression is that I'm awash in "to be" verbs. They're all over the place just a few paragraphs in. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. This is especially important at the beginning of the story, where action will hold the reader's interest. I usually save this for the end, but here are your counts for the easier forms to search:
was/wasn't: 41, were/weren't: 21, are/aren't: 4, is/isn't: 5, be/been/being: 20. That's about one every other sentence, so that's how often something isn't happening. I think it would serve your story well to choose more active verbs.

>two-hundred burrows//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>As a nymph my sisters and I//

She and her sisters were a single nymph?

>I had taken a hoof-full of burrows who could barely stop hating and raiding each other long enough to prevent their slow extinction from inbreeding and starvation,//

I agree with that comma. But you need to pair it with one at the beginning of the clause, before "who."

>waded into boiling shallows//

Missing a "the"?

>One such changeling was Hythacine. We had known each other since earliest nymphhood.//

Let me make this clear: this is merely my opinion. I offer it only as something I think will improve your writing in this story, but you can take it or leave it as you wish. It will not affect whether your story gets posted.

This feels like a very strange tangent for me. Here's why: Chrysalis is telling someone this story, but I don't know who. Am I eavesdropping as she tells someone else? Or is she speaking to me? The distinction is often unimportant. It's implicit in most first-person narration that the character is speaking to someone, but it's usually not explicit, so it's easy to sweep that under the rug, though some scholars will say you never can. So, at one end of the spectrum, we have a first person narrator who tells her story. Period. On the other end, we have one who interacts with the reader, invites him in to hear her tale, asks him how he's doing, and frequently breaks into the story to ask if he'd like a drink. The latter rarely works in isolation. It begs the questions of who am I, why does she want to tell me this story, why do I want to listen, where are we and what are we doing as I listen? So a story that adopts a tone of a dialogue between the narrator and reader takes some justification for the reader's presence. This tangent really feels like a conversational one. The narrator is motivated beyond just getting her tale told—she's letting her mind wander and taking me on the trip with her. This fits much more with her sitting down in a room with me and regaling me with her story than just making a record of it for whoever might want to read it, or even musing to herself. This will not bother most readers, but I think taking this into consideration really makes a richer experience. You should think about going without such a conversational affectation or justifying it.

>saving my children and I//

This is a common error for people deathly afraid of misusing "me," but it's actually the correct choice here. It's part of the compound direct object of the verb "saving," so it needs to be in objective case. To use a standardized testing conceit, I:we::me:us. So, would you say "saving we" or "saving us"? The first-person pronoun will take the same case.

>wound so that our companions would not see how badly wounded//

Watch the word repetition.

>her family’s life//

Lives, yes?

>burrow — she//

Since you're going with em dashes, don't put spaces around them. Or you could switch over to en dashes.

>I would have flayed each of my progenitors a dozen times over to save her once.//

You used "flayed" not long ago. The more unusual a word is, the more space you have to give it before using it again, or it sticks out in the reader's head, and he notices the repetition.

>niaids//

Naiads, yes?

>pyrrhic//

In this sense, it's capitalized (lower case refers to poetic meter).

>But if I have learned anything in the months since the Strangest Day//

Comma after the dependent clause.

>it’s that loss can make you choose what you long for//

For the reasons I already discussed at length, it can be problematic for the narrator to address the reader unless it will be habitual and put in context. It can be difficult to avoid at times, but it can also be worth avoiding that can of worms.

>Powerful tools of magic that gave the ponies their strength//

Why is this capitalized?

>The scientists in Canterlot told me later that Discord’s inhibition wave had played havoc with their immune systems, and turned the most minor of infections into ones that even the strongest of changelings could not hope to withstand.//

In contrast to my last comment about commas, there is only a single clause here, so the comma isn't required.

>He had been blinded in one eye, his left ear was torn and half hanging off, and was using magic to support a broken leg.//

Note the placement of the various clauses' subjects. You're saying that his ear was using magic to support a broken leg.

>forty-four//

The coincidence that he saved the exact same number of ponies before and after she noticed him is too extreme to be plausible. It just makes the whole thing feel contrived.

>He wished to make love to me//

This also feels rather forced and engineered to extract sympathy from the reader rather than sound realistic. At least you do make the case that he's behaving in a way she didn't expect, but I have to believe he wants to do this with Chrysalis because he appreciates that she's helping him, not because he looks like Cadance. Still, it's a reasonable doubt she has, so I'm glad she doesn't let him, but it's not clear how well he even knows her, or which reason she's using to deny him. Because of the roles they played, he probably knows who she is, but I have no sense that they've ever met before, so this is really jumping the gun.

>keep Cadance and I//

There's that "me" thing again.

>You took risked everything because there was so little to lose and so much to be gained.//

Addressing the reader again. And a bit of jumbled wording.

>they are all that keeps you going//

Number mismatch. "All" can be plural or singular, but it has a plural antecedent here.

Just resubmit when you're ready, and I'll give it a quick scan.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Nice opening scene. You have my attention.<br /><br />My second impression is that I&#039;m awash in &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re all over the place just a few paragraphs in. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. This is especially important at the beginning of the story, where action will hold the reader&#039;s interest. I usually save this for the end, but here are your counts for the easier forms to search:<br />was/wasn&#039;t: 41, were/weren&#039;t: 21, are/aren&#039;t: 4, is/isn&#039;t: 5, be/been/being: 20. That&#039;s about one every other sentence, so that&#039;s how often something <i>isn&#039;t</i> happening. I think it would serve your story well to choose more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two-hundred burrows//</span><br />No reason to hyphenate that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As a nymph my sisters and I//</span><br />She and her sisters were a single nymph?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I had taken a hoof-full of burrows who could barely stop hating and raiding each other long enough to prevent their slow extinction from inbreeding and starvation,//</span><br />I agree with that comma. But you need to pair it with one at the beginning of the clause, before &quot;who.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waded into boiling shallows//</span><br />Missing a &quot;the&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One such changeling was Hythacine. We had known each other since earliest nymphhood.//</span><br />Let me make this clear: this is merely my opinion. I offer it only as something I think will improve your writing in this story, but you can take it or leave it as you wish. It will not affect whether your story gets posted.<br /><br />This feels like a very strange tangent for me. Here&#039;s why: Chrysalis is telling someone this story, but I don&#039;t know who. Am I eavesdropping as she tells someone else? Or is she speaking to me? The distinction is often unimportant. It&#039;s implicit in most first-person narration that the character is speaking to someone, but it&#039;s usually not explicit, so it&#039;s easy to sweep that under the rug, though some scholars will say you never can. So, at one end of the spectrum, we have a first person narrator who tells her story. Period. On the other end, we have one who interacts with the reader, invites him in to hear her tale, asks him how he&#039;s doing, and frequently breaks into the story to ask if he&#039;d like a drink. The latter rarely works in isolation. It begs the questions of who am I, why does she want to tell me this story, why do I want to listen, where are we and what are we doing as I listen? So a story that adopts a tone of a dialogue between the narrator and reader takes some justification for the reader&#039;s presence. This tangent really feels like a conversational one. The narrator is motivated beyond just getting her tale told—she&#039;s letting her mind wander and taking me on the trip with her. This fits much more with her sitting down in a room with me and regaling me with her story than just making a record of it for whoever might want to read it, or even musing to herself. This will not bother most readers, but I think taking this into consideration really makes a richer experience. You should think about going without such a conversational affectation or justifying it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saving my children and I//</span><br />This is a common error for people deathly afraid of misusing &quot;me,&quot; but it&#039;s actually the correct choice here. It&#039;s part of the compound direct object of the verb &quot;saving,&quot; so it needs to be in objective case. To use a standardized testing conceit, I:we::me:us. So, would you say &quot;saving we&quot; or &quot;saving us&quot;? The first-person pronoun will take the same case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wound so that our companions would not see how badly wounded//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her family’s life//</span><br />Lives, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;burrow — she//</span><br />Since you&#039;re going with em dashes, don&#039;t put spaces around them. Or you could switch over to en dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I would have flayed each of my progenitors a dozen times over to save her once.//</span><br />You used &quot;flayed&quot; not long ago. The more unusual a word is, the more space you have to give it before using it again, or it sticks out in the reader&#039;s head, and he notices the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;niaids//</span><br />Naiads, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pyrrhic//</span><br />In this sense, it&#039;s capitalized (lower case refers to poetic meter).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But if I have learned anything in the months since the Strangest Day//</span><br />Comma after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s that loss can make you choose what you long for//</span><br />For the reasons I already discussed at length, it can be problematic for the narrator to address the reader unless it will be habitual and put in context. It can be difficult to avoid at times, but it can also be worth avoiding that can of worms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Powerful tools of magic that gave the ponies their strength//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The scientists in Canterlot told me later that Discord’s inhibition wave had played havoc with their immune systems, and turned the most minor of infections into ones that even the strongest of changelings could not hope to withstand.//</span><br />In contrast to my last comment about commas, there is only a single clause here, so the comma isn&#039;t required.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He had been blinded in one eye, his left ear was torn and half hanging off, and was using magic to support a broken leg.//</span><br />Note the placement of the various clauses&#039; subjects. You&#039;re saying that his ear was using magic to support a broken leg.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;forty-four//</span><br />The coincidence that he saved the exact same number of ponies before and after she noticed him is too extreme to be plausible. It just makes the whole thing feel contrived.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He wished to make love to me//</span><br />This also feels rather forced and engineered to extract sympathy from the reader rather than sound realistic. At least you do make the case that he&#039;s behaving in a way she didn&#039;t expect, but I have to believe he wants to do this with Chrysalis because he appreciates that she&#039;s helping him, not because he looks like Cadance. Still, it&#039;s a reasonable doubt she has, so I&#039;m glad she doesn&#039;t let him, but it&#039;s not clear how well he even knows her, or which reason she&#039;s using to deny him. Because of the roles they played, he probably knows who she is, but I have no sense that they&#039;ve ever met before, so this is really jumping the gun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;keep Cadance and I//</span><br />There&#039;s that &quot;me&quot; thing again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You took risked everything because there was so little to lose and so much to be gained.//</span><br />Addressing the reader again. And a bit of jumbled wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they are all that keeps you going//</span><br />Number mismatch. &quot;All&quot; can be plural or singular, but it has a plural antecedent here.<br /><br />Just resubmit when you&#039;re ready, and I&#039;ll give it a quick scan.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Wed, May 28th, 2014 19:37</span></div><br/>

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 220

>>130516

I've made several fixes, most of them the technical issues you pointed out. I've kept some things, however.

The few 'and I' bits I've kept constant, as the technically correct way does not sound as grand and full of pomp. Chrysalis is telling a memoir, a history of her nation, and an autohagiography of her role as the sacred leader of the changeling nation. She'd go for arch over Strunk and White any day.

Again, much of the passive 'to be' stuff is intentional. It's a fantastical history, not a thriller. Look at this speech from Conan the Barbarian:

>The ashes were trampled into the Earth, and the blood became as snow. Who knows what they came for… weapons of steel, or murder? It was never known, for their leader rode to the south, while the children went north with the Vanir. No one would ever know that my lord's people had lived at all. His was a tale of sorrow.


Put that all in active voice and you get a paragraph that reads twice as quickly and loses all of its power.

Same deal with the numbers and repetitions of certain words. The numbers in this story are perhaps not meant to be any more accurate than the idea of 144,000 virgins in Revelation, or 40 days and 40 nights of rain.

Finally, Shining Armor's suddenness. The mourning took place after Discord had been defeated, and the changelings had been openly working with the Equestrians to defeat him. As the two high ranking military leaders during the defence of Equestria, it's likely that Chrysalis and Shining Armor would have crossed paths on more than one occasion, as she implies when she mentions seeing him rescue four scores of ponies.

That's about it. Thank you very much for the review, it was incredibly helpful as far as the technical side is concerned. I spent all night with various tweaks and suchlike. Do I simply resubmit at this point?

Thanks again,

Chuck.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130516" onclick="return highlight('130516', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130516">&gt;&gt;130516</a><br /><br />I&#039;ve made several fixes, most of them the technical issues you pointed out. I&#039;ve kept some things, however.<br /><br />The few &#039;and I&#039; bits I&#039;ve kept constant, as the technically correct way does not sound as grand and full of pomp. Chrysalis is telling a memoir, a history of her nation, and an autohagiography of her role as the sacred leader of the changeling nation. She&#039;d go for arch over Strunk and White any day.<br /><br />Again, much of the passive &#039;to be&#039; stuff is intentional. It&#039;s a fantastical history, not a thriller. Look at this speech from Conan the Barbarian:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The ashes were trampled into the Earth, and the blood became as snow. Who knows what they came for… weapons of steel, or murder? It was never known, for their leader rode to the south, while the children went north with the Vanir. No one would ever know that my lord&#039;s people had lived at all. His was a tale of sorrow. </span><br /><br />Put that all in active voice and you get a paragraph that reads twice as quickly and loses all of its power.<br /><br />Same deal with the numbers and repetitions of certain words. The numbers in this story are perhaps not meant to be any more accurate than the idea of 144,000 virgins in Revelation, or 40 days and 40 nights of rain.<br /><br />Finally, Shining Armor&#039;s suddenness. The mourning took place after Discord had been defeated, and the changelings had been openly working with the Equestrians to defeat him. As the two high ranking military leaders during the defence of Equestria, it&#039;s likely that Chrysalis and Shining Armor would have crossed paths on more than one occasion, as she implies when she mentions seeing him rescue four scores of ponies.<br /><br />That&#039;s about it. Thank you very much for the review, it was incredibly helpful as far as the technical side is concerned. I spent all night with various tweaks and suchlike. Do I simply resubmit at this point?<br /><br />Thanks again,<br /><br />Chuck.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 221

>>130521
I'm going to send up your story for posting anyway, because it's good, and because if you listened to everything I said, then you'd have a story which most suits me. I would still like to address a couple of your points, if only to give you some food for thought.

The "and I" is fine if that's an affectation Chrysalis has. There's perfect grammar, and there's grammar perfect for the character. Liberally sprinkling semicolons through a child's speech may be correct, but it does not at all evoke childlike dialogue. So if your mental picture of Chrysalis has her using this deliberately or not knowing the rule, then more power to you.

The "to be" stuff and the quote from Conan… Well, that quote only uses 3 such verbs. It does have plenty of active language (in my opinion, the "it was known" would be better served with an active structure). "to be" verbs do have their place, and it's impractical to avoid them altogether, but they are less engaging. They do have a way of working for grandstanding, and point taken that Chrysalis is trying to convey a grand history, but this causes a couple of hiccups for me. If she's really trying to impress this much, then it inflates my earlier point about who her audience is. And it creates an inconsistent feel, since she's going from these very personal moments to this epic of history. The two would seem to have different purposes and audiences. It's certainly possible for a story to be both, but in one this short, it doesn't have the space to blend back and forth, and it creates more of a mood whiplash than a meandering feel. At least for me. The use of exaggerated numbers is along the same vein again. One minute, it's a very intimate portrait, and the next, it's a Klingon warrior telling of exploits on the battlefield.

I had pretty much figured out that Shining Armor and Chrysalis must have met before, but leaving that completely for the reader to intuit weakens the effect for me. If they had more of a history together, it'd lend strength to why she wants to help him in particular over just wanting to help any given ally. To wit, if he means that much to her, wouldn't he have been on her mind more? If that was such an important part if her life, it's strangely absent until it needs to be introduced for the plot to work, and the effect is to lessen the impact.

So I hope this helps in some way. Maybe you don't agree, and that's fine. I at least hope it gets you thinking the next time you write. And it's a testament to the story that I'm able to dig into these deeper issues rather than spend my time harping at you about badly punctuated dialogue and sloppy characterization. These abstract issues are the difference between a good fic and a wow! fic.


Oh, and you didn't get a strike. Nowadays, those are only for stories that have numerous problems and come back without addressing them in any appreciable manner. This was a "Mars," or "needs no more than a cursory glance to approve posting when it returns."
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130521" onclick="return highlight('130521', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130521">&gt;&gt;130521</a><br />I&#039;m going to send up your story for posting anyway, because it&#039;s good, and because if you listened to everything I said, then you&#039;d have a story which most suits me. I would still like to address a couple of your points, if only to give you some food for thought.<br /><br />The &quot;and I&quot; is fine if that&#039;s an affectation Chrysalis has. There&#039;s perfect grammar, and there&#039;s grammar perfect for the character. Liberally sprinkling semicolons through a child&#039;s speech may be correct, but it does not at all evoke childlike dialogue. So if your mental picture of Chrysalis has her using this deliberately or not knowing the rule, then more power to you.<br /><br />The &quot;to be&quot; stuff and the quote from Conan… Well, that quote only uses 3 such verbs. It does have plenty of active language (in my opinion, the &quot;it was known&quot; would be better served with an active structure). &quot;to be&quot; verbs do have their place, and it&#039;s impractical to avoid them altogether, but they are less engaging. They do have a way of working for grandstanding, and point taken that Chrysalis is trying to convey a grand history, but this causes a couple of hiccups for me. If she&#039;s really trying to impress this much, then it inflates my earlier point about who her audience is. And it creates an inconsistent feel, since she&#039;s going from these very personal moments to this epic of history. The two would seem to have different purposes and audiences. It&#039;s certainly possible for a story to be both, but in one this short, it doesn&#039;t have the space to blend back and forth, and it creates more of a mood whiplash than a meandering feel. At least for me. The use of exaggerated numbers is along the same vein again. One minute, it&#039;s a very intimate portrait, and the next, it&#039;s a Klingon warrior telling of exploits on the battlefield.<br /><br />I had pretty much figured out that Shining Armor and Chrysalis must have met before, but leaving that completely for the reader to intuit weakens the effect for me. If they had more of a history together, it&#039;d lend strength to why she wants to help him in particular over just wanting to help any given ally. To wit, if he means that much to her, wouldn&#039;t he have been on her mind more? If that was such an important part if her life, it&#039;s strangely absent until it needs to be introduced for the plot to work, and the effect is to lessen the impact.<br /><br />So I hope this helps in some way. Maybe you don&#039;t agree, and that&#039;s fine. I at least hope it gets you thinking the next time you write. And it&#039;s a testament to the story that I&#039;m able to dig into these deeper issues rather than spend my time harping at you about badly punctuated dialogue and sloppy characterization. These abstract issues are the difference between a good fic and a wow! fic.<br /><br /><br />Oh, and you didn&#039;t get a strike. Nowadays, those are only for stories that have numerous problems and come back without addressing them in any appreciable manner. This was a &quot;Mars,&quot; or &quot;needs no more than a cursory glance to approve posting when it returns.&quot;<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Thu, May 29th, 2014 16:41</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 222

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>she hadn't laid//

Lay/lie confusion. This is a tricky one. You need "lain" here.

>The shadows made shapes of monsters and demons, before vanishing as her imagination searched for new patterns.//

This is a nice moment, but you suggest so much without actually doing anything. I think it would do you well to linger here. What other shapes does she see? Does her state of mind influence what she sees, or does she let the shapes instead guide her thoughts? How does she feel about what she sees? There's rich ground for a character moment here.

>was - once again - going//

Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.

>woollen//

woolen

>On it//

You're more "in" a picture than "on" it.

>The edges had been blackened slightly, and the frame itself had been shattered beyond all repair//

I don't see the point of the passive voice here. It's unnecessarily circuitous, and while rephrasing is usually the remedy, you could simply remove the "been" in both cases.

>Moon//

Why is this capitalized?

>felt felt//

copied word

>She felt the grain of the wood beneath her hooves, and saw her familiar telescope standing in front of her.//

See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. Basically, you have a compound structure here, not a new clause, so you don't need the comma.

>Tirek's magic was just as ancient, would he be able to do the same?//

Comma splice.

>Fear gripped Twilight's body.//

Read the section on show versus tell, too. Basically, don't just say she was afraid. Get me to conclude it through her actions and appearance.

>Grab whatever valuable you can find.//

"Valuables," yes?

>Then ashes and wreckage.//

By setting this whole scene off (preferably with a bbcode [hr]), you've already obviated the need to put the whole thing in italics. For one, there are more effective ways of hinting to the reader that it's a flashback, the most obvious being that the reader will already know her fight with Tirek came before taking up residence in the castle. But also consider that italics are meant to make things stand out. They just get irritating when everything does. It might be okay for a small number of lines, but an entire scene is too much.

>neither could tell//

Be very careful with your perspective here. Read the section on head hopping. This line gets into both of their heads, but Twilight had been holding the perspective in this scene. For example, only she would be aware of this:
>Twilight had meant to make an effort to bow to her elder.//

>"Twilight…" Luna began, but Twilight cut her off.//

If you really mean that to be a cutoff, use a dash, not an ellipsis.

>And then she would defeat them.//

Defeat whom? Just Tirek, right?

>looking her in the eye now, a look//

Watch the word repetition.

>She felt like she was growing.//

Given that you'e using a limited narration, why not let the narration itself carry more emotion? She's stating an awful lot of these things very factually. It leaves things with a bit of a dry feel.

>away and never given it back//

You don't need that "it."

>Who was this feeble filly?//

Twilight wasn't exactly a filly when this happened. Is Luna using the term in an endearing way? Because it's not accurate…

>Princess'//

This is not technically wrong, but the traditional way is "Princess's." The strongest argument I can make for the traditional way is that even though people may spell it this way, they rarely say it this way, especially for shorter words like "boss." But it has gained acceptance, and if you want to keep it this way, you can.

This is an interesting take on why Twilight gave up her magic. It's a little rushed, and while I only pointed out one example of telly language, there's quite a bit of it in there, which lessens its emotional impact. The only other major complaint I have is the large number of "to be" verbs. These are inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should choose more active verbs where possible. Of the easier forms to search, I counted 136. You're using them at a rate of about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen in your story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she hadn&#039;t laid//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. This is a tricky one. You need &quot;lain&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The shadows made shapes of monsters and demons, before vanishing as her imagination searched for new patterns.//</span><br />This is a nice moment, but you suggest so much without actually doing anything. I think it would do you well to linger here. What other shapes does she see? Does her state of mind influence what she sees, or does she let the shapes instead guide her thoughts? How does she feel about what she sees? There&#039;s rich ground for a character moment here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was - once again - going//</span><br />Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;woollen//</span><br />woolen<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On it//</span><br />You&#039;re more &quot;in&quot; a picture than &quot;on&quot; it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The edges had been blackened slightly, and the frame itself had been shattered beyond all repair//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the point of the passive voice here. It&#039;s unnecessarily circuitous, and while rephrasing is usually the remedy, you could simply remove the &quot;been&quot; in both cases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Moon//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;felt felt//</span><br />copied word<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt the grain of the wood beneath her hooves, and saw her familiar telescope standing in front of her.//</span><br />See the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. Basically, you have a compound structure here, not a new clause, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tirek&#039;s magic was just as ancient, would he be able to do the same?//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fear gripped Twilight&#039;s body.//</span><br />Read the section on show versus tell, too. Basically, don&#039;t just say she was afraid. Get me to conclude it through her actions and appearance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Grab whatever valuable you can find.//</span><br />&quot;Valuables,&quot; yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then ashes and wreckage.//</span><br />By setting this whole scene off (preferably with a bbcode [hr]), you&#039;ve already obviated the need to put the whole thing in italics. For one, there are more effective ways of hinting to the reader that it&#039;s a flashback, the most obvious being that the reader will already know her fight with Tirek came before taking up residence in the castle. But also consider that italics are meant to make things stand out. They just get irritating when everything does. It might be okay for a small number of lines, but an entire scene is too much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;neither could tell//</span><br />Be very careful with your perspective here. Read the section on head hopping. This line gets into both of their heads, but Twilight had been holding the perspective in this scene. For example, only she would be aware of this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight had meant to make an effort to bow to her elder.//</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Twilight…&quot; Luna began, but Twilight cut her off.//</span><br />If you really mean that to be a cutoff, use a dash, not an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And then she would defeat them.//</span><br />Defeat whom? Just Tirek, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking her in the eye now, a look//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt like she was growing.//</span><br />Given that you&#039;e using a limited narration, why not let the narration itself carry more emotion? She&#039;s stating an awful lot of these things very factually. It leaves things with a bit of a dry feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;away and never given it back//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that &quot;it.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Who was this feeble filly?//</span><br />Twilight wasn&#039;t exactly a filly when this happened. Is Luna using the term in an endearing way? Because it&#039;s not accurate…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess&#039;//</span><br />This is not technically wrong, but the traditional way is &quot;Princess&#039;s.&quot; The strongest argument I can make for the traditional way is that even though people may spell it this way, they rarely say it this way, especially for shorter words like &quot;boss.&quot; But it has gained acceptance, and if you want to keep it this way, you can.<br /><br />This is an interesting take on why Twilight gave up her magic. It&#039;s a little rushed, and while I only pointed out one example of telly language, there&#039;s quite a bit of it in there, which lessens its emotional impact. The only other major complaint I have is the large number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. These are inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should choose more active verbs where possible. Of the easier forms to search, I counted 136. You&#039;re using them at a rate of about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something <i>doesn&#039;t</i> happen in your story.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 223

>>130610
Thanks for the advice! I went through and tried to correct all the issues you mentioned, as well as adapt the criticisms you had to the rest of the story in general. Some of the mistakes I should have caught, some I owe to the fact that I write in plain text (no dashes, for one, but I'll make sure to use – in the future and then find/replace it when I post), and some I admit are problems that often get pointed out to me in my writing.
I've re-submitted it with the changes, I hope it's improved some, and if ti's not ready for posting, I'll just keep working, or try harder with my next story :D
The issue of the 's after a word that that ends in s is a debatable one. My own first name ends in an s, so I always was taught (and am very used to) leaving off the additional s. This article summarizes the issue rather well http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/apostrophe-catastrophe-part-two
Once again, thanks for being such a help, and here's to a successful submission in the future!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130610" onclick="return highlight('130610', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130610">&gt;&gt;130610</a><br />Thanks for the advice! I went through and tried to correct all the issues you mentioned, as well as adapt the criticisms you had to the rest of the story in general. Some of the mistakes I should have caught, some I owe to the fact that I write in plain text (no dashes, for one, but I&#039;ll make sure to use – in the future and then find/replace it when I post), and some I admit are problems that often get pointed out to me in my writing.<br />I&#039;ve re-submitted it with the changes, I hope it&#039;s improved some, and if ti&#039;s not ready for posting, I&#039;ll just keep working, or try harder with my next story :D<br />The issue of the &#039;s after a word that that ends in s is a debatable one. My own first name ends in an s, so I always was taught (and am very used to) leaving off the additional s. This article summarizes the issue rather well <a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/apostrophe-catastrophe-part-two">http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/apostrophe-catastrophe-part-two</a><br />Once again, thanks for being such a help, and here&#039;s to a successful submission in the future!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 224

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Don't worry,” Sweetie Belle chirped//

Missing your opening quotation marks. Maybe this is a format thing you're doing, but I've seen these :illuminated" first letters include it.

>Applejack encouraged//

Transitive verb needs a direct object.

>to not//

Swap these. It's an easy infinitive not to split, and it just sounds awkward.

>Applejack turned to Sweetie Belle, eyeing the knife the young unicorn still held in her magical clutches.//

Note that participles like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start a clause, in which case they modify the subject. So by default, you're saying Sweetie Belle is eyeing the knife. If it had been an inanimate object in the sentence there, we could apply a bit of logic to assume you meant Applejack. But since both possible objects are characters, it could plausibly be either of them. In some cases, that ambiguity may never get relieved. At least in this case, you do give us enough info to sort it out, but the sentence is misleading until we get there, and you don't want readers having to reread the sentence to understand it.

>she added upon seeing Rarity's upturned eyebrow.//

Watch your perspective. You started the story in Applejack's head, but unless couched as being her perception of this, it feels like you've moved into Sweetie Belle's head. Then take what soon follows:
>The older unicorn seemed unconvinced.//
This also smacks of being in Sweetie Belle's perspective. You don't want to change perspective unnecessarily, too often, or too rapidly. Read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>Applejack asked as a knife and platter zipped through the air.//

I'm barely a screen into the story, and this is already the seventh "as" clause I've encountered. They're clumped together, too, as half of your first ten sentences had one. If you fall into ruts like this, it makes your writing feel repetitive. "As" clauses are also commonly overused by inexperienced authors. Likewise with participles.

>Applejack leaned against the table, catching Rarity's eye.//

And as I was saying, this is already the fifth participle I've seen, and they're somewhat clustered, too, which gives an impression of being even more locally repetitive.

>She trailed off//

Trailing off and getting cut off are things you typically shouldn't reiterate in the narration, since we can already tell from the punctuation.

>Rarity looked at her sibling with pride.//

I've seen a little of this, too. Read the section on show versus tell. You don't always have to show, but this is a pretty important moment in setting up the characters' motivations. What does this look like? Paint me the picture and let me draw the conclusion.

>lead on//

The past tense of "lead" is "led." (You do this in multiple places.) But based on the phrasing, I believe you wanted "let on."

>in a display of mock astonishment//

Here's the narrator making a conclusion on my behalf again.

>“From mine own sister? Why, I do declare!”//

This is… schizophrenic. Victorian and nineteenth-century southern American?

>sis//

When using this as a term of address, capitalize it.

>It was a simple thing, but it warmed the earth pony's heart more than she could say.//

A word about "to be" verbs: boring. It's much more interesting to rad about what happens, not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs. It's impractical to eliminate them altogether, but this paragraph alone contains six of them. It brings the feeling of forward motion in the story to a halt.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>as a way to hide her embarrassment//

Applejack holds the perspective here, and it sounds odd that she'd be willing to admit it. She might be a little more indirect, like it's hiding her face.

>“Yes,” Rarity smiled.//

How does one smile a sentence?

>enjoying each other's company and the smells and sounds of spring that were ubiquitous in the orchard.//

So show me some of this. What they feel and what smells they notice give quite a bit of insight to their characters, since they'd likely have very different reactions. Hay, for instance, would probably call up far different imagery for Applejack than Rarity. And of course, you may well have to limit yourself to AJ's impressions here, since she's the perspective character.

>“Darling, whatever do you mean?”//

And here's the crux of the dissonance here. Rarity is at once saying they've kept it from Sweetie Belle because she might react badly, and in her next breath, is oblivious to a suggestion that Sweetie Belle might find it odd. She's playing both sides of it here, and it doesn't quite ring true.

>She licked the earth pony's cheek.//

This is weird. Is she trying to rub off a smudge? Or is this supposed to be some form of kiss? It's just left out there without explaining it as either, and it's really awkward.

>jasmine//

Capitalize, as it's the first word in the quote that we get from her.

>She could still picture, exactly, Rarity's eyebrows rising higher and higher as her eyes widened, her mouth open ever so slightly as Applejack regaled the astounded unicorn with a list of her favorite teas, the appropriate season in which they should be brewed, and the attending amount of tea leaves, per cup, that she found to be most satisfactory.//

And now you have two "as" clauses in the same sentence. Since they synchronize actions, you also have a lot of things fighting each other for chronology here.

>the purple coils of the unicorn's mane falling like silken ribbon against her own rustic coat. Beneath her, the century-old, stoic rumblings of the apple tree seemed to pulse reassuringly.//

Another problem with perspective: If you're going to use a limited narrator, you have to take care that the narrator resemble the character, at least vaguely. But these aren't word choices I could see Applejack making, let alone judging her own coat as "rustic."

>Applejack was silent for a long time//

In the lines leading up to this, Applejack's describing something that should be alarming to her: growing apart from family. Yet there's precious little evidence that it bothers her. Just one sigh and grinding teeth. Is she reluctant to admit this? Or does she show any more outward signs of it? Hold it in? It passes by without comment quickly enough that it's hard to assign much importance to it.

>The unicorn leaned back against the tree, wrapping her hooves around the earth pony's neck//

Alright, it's time to call you out on the Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There's a section on that at the top of this thread, too. We know Rarity is a unicorn and Applejack is an earth pony. Saying so doesn't add anything.

>My parent's businesses//

She only had one parent?

>the one's closest to you//

Unnecessary apostrophe.

>she soothed//

Another transitive verb that needs a direct object.

I've already made most of the points I wanted to in the details, which only leaves one. The issue oddly goes from how everyone will regard their relationship (and it's only mentioned that their sisters don't know—do other ponies around town?) to whether Apple Bloom should get a chance to see the world. There's never a connection made between the two, and the first is never resolved. It feels vaguely disconnected and unsatisfying. The former is also the one that involves some sort of real conflict. Just having Applejack feel better about being with Rarity is on the weak side, as we can assume they wouldn't be together if it weren't already something Rarity didn't care about and Applejack didn't feel was worth pushing.

And watch the narrative voice. It really deviates from what Applejack could be expected to say. Since it's not first-person, I wouldn't recommend taking on her accent, but general word choice and intelligence level, yes. He sounds a lot more highbrow than she would.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don&#039;t worry,” Sweetie Belle chirped//</span><br />Missing your opening quotation marks. Maybe this is a format thing you&#039;re doing, but I&#039;ve seen these :illuminated&quot; first letters include it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack encouraged//</span><br />Transitive verb needs a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not//</span><br />Swap these. It&#039;s an easy infinitive not to split, and it just sounds awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack turned to Sweetie Belle, eyeing the knife the young unicorn still held in her magical clutches.//</span><br />Note that participles like to modify the nearest prior object, unless they start a clause, in which case they modify the subject. So by default, you&#039;re saying Sweetie Belle is eyeing the knife. If it had been an inanimate object in the sentence there, we could apply a bit of logic to assume you meant Applejack. But since both possible objects are characters, it could plausibly be either of them. In some cases, that ambiguity may never get relieved. At least in this case, you do give us enough info to sort it out, but the sentence is misleading until we get there, and you don&#039;t want readers having to reread the sentence to understand it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she added upon seeing Rarity&#039;s upturned eyebrow.//</span><br />Watch your perspective. You started the story in Applejack&#039;s head, but unless couched as being her perception of this, it feels like you&#039;ve moved into Sweetie Belle&#039;s head. Then take what soon follows:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The older unicorn seemed unconvinced.//</span><br />This also smacks of being in Sweetie Belle&#039;s perspective. You don&#039;t want to change perspective unnecessarily, too often, or too rapidly. Read the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack asked as a knife and platter zipped through the air.//</span><br />I&#039;m barely a screen into the story, and this is already the seventh &quot;as&quot; clause I&#039;ve encountered. They&#039;re clumped together, too, as half of your first ten sentences had one. If you fall into ruts like this, it makes your writing feel repetitive. &quot;As&quot; clauses are also commonly overused by inexperienced authors. Likewise with participles.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack leaned against the table, catching Rarity&#039;s eye.//</span><br />And as I was saying, this is already the fifth participle I&#039;ve seen, and they&#039;re somewhat clustered, too, which gives an impression of being even more locally repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She trailed off//</span><br />Trailing off and getting cut off are things you typically shouldn&#039;t reiterate in the narration, since we can already tell from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity looked at her sibling with pride.//</span><br />I&#039;ve seen a little of this, too. Read the section on show versus tell. You don&#039;t always have to show, but this is a pretty important moment in setting up the characters&#039; motivations. What does this look like? Paint me the picture and let me draw the conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lead on//</span><br />The past tense of &quot;lead&quot; is &quot;led.&quot; (You do this in multiple places.) But based on the phrasing, I believe you wanted &quot;let on.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in a display of mock astonishment//</span><br />Here&#039;s the narrator making a conclusion on my behalf again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“From mine own sister? Why, I do declare!”//</span><br />This is… schizophrenic. Victorian and nineteenth-century southern American?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />When using this as a term of address, capitalize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a simple thing, but it warmed the earth pony&#039;s heart more than she could say.//</span><br />A word about &quot;to be&quot; verbs: boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to rad about what happens, not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs. It&#039;s impractical to eliminate them altogether, but this paragraph alone contains six of them. It brings the feeling of forward motion in the story to a halt.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as a way to hide her embarrassment//</span><br />Applejack holds the perspective here, and it sounds odd that she&#039;d be willing to admit it. She might be a little more indirect, like it&#039;s hiding her face.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yes,” Rarity smiled.//</span><br />How does one smile a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;enjoying each other&#039;s company and the smells and sounds of spring that were ubiquitous in the orchard.//</span><br />So show me some of this. What they feel and what smells they notice give quite a bit of insight to their characters, since they&#039;d likely have very different reactions. Hay, for instance, would probably call up far different imagery for Applejack than Rarity. And of course, you may well have to limit yourself to AJ&#039;s impressions here, since she&#039;s the perspective character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Darling, whatever do you mean?”//</span><br />And here&#039;s the crux of the dissonance here. Rarity is at once saying they&#039;ve kept it from Sweetie Belle because she might react badly, and in her next breath, is oblivious to a suggestion that Sweetie Belle might find it odd. She&#039;s playing both sides of it here, and it doesn&#039;t quite ring true.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She licked the earth pony&#039;s cheek.//</span><br />This is weird. Is she trying to rub off a smudge? Or is this supposed to be some form of kiss? It&#039;s just left out there without explaining it as either, and it&#039;s really awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;jasmine//</span><br />Capitalize, as it&#039;s the first word in the quote that we get from her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could still picture, exactly, Rarity&#039;s eyebrows rising higher and higher as her eyes widened, her mouth open ever so slightly as Applejack regaled the astounded unicorn with a list of her favorite teas, the appropriate season in which they should be brewed, and the attending amount of tea leaves, per cup, that she found to be most satisfactory.//</span><br />And now you have two &quot;as&quot; clauses in the same sentence. Since they synchronize actions, you also have a lot of things fighting each other for chronology here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the purple coils of the unicorn&#039;s mane falling like silken ribbon against her own rustic coat. Beneath her, the century-old, stoic rumblings of the apple tree seemed to pulse reassuringly.//</span><br />Another problem with perspective: If you&#039;re going to use a limited narrator, you have to take care that the narrator resemble the character, at least vaguely. But these aren&#039;t word choices I could see Applejack making, let alone judging her own coat as &quot;rustic.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack was silent for a long time//</span><br />In the lines leading up to this, Applejack&#039;s describing something that should be alarming to her: growing apart from family. Yet there&#039;s precious little evidence that it bothers her. Just one sigh and grinding teeth. Is she reluctant to admit this? Or does she show any more outward signs of it? Hold it in? It passes by without comment quickly enough that it&#039;s hard to assign much importance to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The unicorn leaned back against the tree, wrapping her hooves around the earth pony&#039;s neck//</span><br />Alright, it&#039;s time to call you out on the Lavender Unicorn Syndrome. There&#039;s a section on that at the top of this thread, too. We know Rarity is a unicorn and Applejack is an earth pony. Saying so doesn&#039;t add anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My parent&#039;s businesses//</span><br />She only had one parent?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the one&#039;s closest to you//</span><br />Unnecessary apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she soothed//</span><br />Another transitive verb that needs a direct object.<br /><br />I&#039;ve already made most of the points I wanted to in the details, which only leaves one. The issue oddly goes from how everyone will regard their relationship (and it&#039;s only mentioned that their sisters don&#039;t know—do other ponies around town?) to whether Apple Bloom should get a chance to see the world. There&#039;s never a connection made between the two, and the first is never resolved. It feels vaguely disconnected and unsatisfying. The former is also the one that involves some sort of real conflict. Just having Applejack feel better about being with Rarity is on the weak side, as we can assume they wouldn&#039;t be together if it weren&#039;t already something Rarity didn&#039;t care about and Applejack didn&#039;t feel was worth pushing.<br /><br />And watch the narrative voice. It really deviates from what Applejack could be expected to say. Since it&#039;s not first-person, I wouldn&#039;t recommend taking on her accent, but general word choice and intelligence level, yes. He sounds a lot more highbrow than she would.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 225

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

So, good news here. I think this is a cute story, and I haven't seen this format done before. It could use some fixing up, though, so I hope that having to redo the text in the graphics isn't a big deal.

The detailed stuff:

>Flying out to the epicentre of the spectral arc, we visited the Summer Flight Camp//

A participle implies concurrent action, so they're flying there at the same time they visit.

>“It was a sonic rainboom!” said young Cirrus Swirl, “Rainbow Dash did it!//

The way you've punctuated that, both parts of the quote would form a single sentence, but you obviously don't believe that, since you stick an exclamation mark in the middle of it.

>then - kaboom - there//

Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.

>Unfortunately Mr Rainbow Dash was not available for comment.//

The reporters flew all the way out there and couldn't be troubled to figure out that Dash is neither a "colt" nor a "Mr"?

>Questions have been asked as to whether she has the experience required to take on the leading role//

This is an incredibly vague thing to say, and where newspapers are pressed for space, they can't afford empty language.

>low lying//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>The leader of the opposition Perfect Storm//

The appositive needs to be set off with commas, or it makes it sound like "Perfect Storm" is an opposition group.

>If we had seen a little less hot air and a bit more action from the mayor//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>We’ve been saying for years that we need to boost recycling, and take waste reduction seriously//

Conversely, there's only one clause here, so you don't need that comma.

>sonic rainboom: A bright rainbow//

You only need to capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>They would have to be really top flyer//

Missing word.

>appearing at the same time as a flyby by a fast pegasus. Some report a bright flash and other effects, but these would appear//

Watch the close repetition of "appear."

>The revival of interest in tales of chivalry//

While interesting, you're stretching credibility a bit to delve into this much of a history lesson on the front page. Newspapers want to cram as many big headlines as they can on the front and relegate the details to the continuations.

>high speed//

Needs a hyphen.

>The most famous experimenter was the maverick millionaire Buster Nimbus//

Needs a comma.

>fog, thunderstorms, and hail showers//

Be consistent about whether you use an Oxford comma.

>old mares' tale//

You're also inconsistent about the placement of the apostrophe here.

>the pegasus filly behind this story//

You need commas on both sides of an appositive.

>lightening//

While weather ponies could certainly create this effect, I believe you meant "lightning."

>lead//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>“We can make no further progress with the current trade minister,” she said, “he’s as stubborn as a mule.”//

Another case where you've punctuated the quote as if both parts form a single sentence, but they don't.

>one day//

Needs a hyphen.

>Red Rose said “The evidence is there for all to see.”//

Missing a comma.

>p20//

Inconsistent with the capital letters you've been using.

>Far-East//

No reason to hyphenate this.

>A TEENAGE PEGASUS was responsible for an outrageous act of high altitude vandalism yesterday//

I doubt she'd have been a teenager. She got her cutie mark doing that, which would place her about the same age as the present-day CMCs. They're portrayed as quite a bit younger than teenagers.

>Then in a foalish hoax boasted that she had created a sonic rainboom.//

I doubt a professional reporter would use sentence fragments in an article.

>well known//

Hyphenate.

>fillies”,//

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>school for gifted unicorns//

Wouldn't this be capitalized?

>Twilight Sparkle, a foalhood friend of Princess Mi Amore Cadenza//

Minor thing, but Twilight knew her very well, and yet didn't know that was her full name. Is it public knowledge?

>examiners notes//

Missing apostrophe.

>rainbow coloured//

Hyphenate.

>The demon spirit, imprisoned in the crystal then spoke to her//

There is no reason for that comma to be there.

>Daring Do and the Quest for the Sapphire Stone//

As a book title, this should be underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>with note on the door//

Missing word.

>P.3//

More inconsistent format.

>the Canterlot lawyer assigned to defend Miss Dash//

Another appositive that needs commas on both sides.

>physically harassing other students; being absent from class without good reason; and behaving in a way to bring the school into disrepute//

None of the list items have their own commas, so there's no reason to use semicolons here.

>Many reporters continued to ask her questions//

That just seems like a vague and pointless thing for an article to say. See my earlier comment about not wasting space on the front page.

>Her defence lawyer Twinkie Tulkinghorn explained://

You sure use this phrasing a lot. It's getting awfully repetitive.

>late night//

Needs a hyphen.

>Council of Equestrian Regions//

Different capitalization than you used in the previous paper.

>much needed//

Needs a hyphen.

And to broader things.

You have Suri Polomare as an adult here, but she certainly appeared to be the same age as Rarity, and her association with Rarity might indicate that as well. But you have Rainbow Dash still as a very young filly.

Likewise, you have Daring Do books existing when Rainbow Dash was still a filly, implying Daring Do was going on adventures and a gifted writer already, yet she doesn't appear in canon to be any older than Dash. For that matter, you also imply that Lyra and Octavia are significantly older than Dash. In contrast, I thought it a rather nice touch that Cheerilee wasn't the teacher.

The rainboom was supposed to have spread all across Equestria, but we only get very local takes on it from Ponyville, Cloudsdale, Canterlot, etc. Would it be possible to have a little more comprehensive coverage, say from Appleloosa, on what a more diverse cross-section of ponies thought?

The last item is that the graphics are nearly impossible to read. I have to click on the images to blow them up, which meant I had to scroll sideways as well as down, and I had to back up a page to click to the next chapter. I don't know what FiMFiction's limits are on picture size and storage, but it'd make it much easier to read if you sized the picture to fit the screen better by default.

I did want to bring up a couple of other reservations I had but that I ultimately decided I could overlook. There really isn't much of a conflict here. Really the only thing at stake was whether Dash would get in trouble, but the treatment of that is so distant (and really, what lawyer would criticize his own client?) that it's not engaging as a conflict. It also spends a significant amount of space rehashing events and accounts we already know from canon. If not for the unique angle, this would be a problem. But at least on the conflict front, we do get a little in the form of this side narrative about the strike.

As I said, this is a cute story, and I'd like to see it posted. Just resubmit it when you're ready, and I'll have another glance.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />So, good news here. I think this is a cute story, and I haven&#039;t seen this format done before. It could use some fixing up, though, so I hope that having to redo the text in the graphics isn&#039;t a big deal.<br /><br />The detailed stuff:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Flying out to the epicentre of the spectral arc, we visited the Summer Flight Camp//</span><br />A participle implies concurrent action, so they&#039;re flying there at the same time they visit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“It was a sonic rainboom!” said young Cirrus Swirl, “Rainbow Dash did it!//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve punctuated that, both parts of the quote would form a single sentence, but you obviously don&#039;t believe that, since you stick an exclamation mark in the middle of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then - kaboom - there//</span><br />Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Unfortunately Mr Rainbow Dash was not available for comment.//</span><br />The reporters flew all the way out there and couldn&#039;t be troubled to figure out that Dash is neither a &quot;colt&quot; nor a &quot;Mr&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Questions have been asked as to whether she has the experience required to take on the leading role//</span><br />This is an incredibly vague thing to say, and where newspapers are pressed for space, they can&#039;t afford empty language.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;low lying//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The leader of the opposition Perfect Storm//</span><br />The appositive needs to be set off with commas, or it makes it sound like &quot;Perfect Storm&quot; is an opposition group.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If we had seen a little less hot air and a bit more action from the mayor//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We’ve been saying for years that we need to boost recycling, and take waste reduction seriously//</span><br />Conversely, there&#039;s only one clause here, so you don&#039;t need that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sonic rainboom: A bright rainbow//</span><br />You only need to capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They would have to be really top flyer//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;appearing at the same time as a flyby by a fast pegasus. Some report a bright flash and other effects, but these would appear//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;appear.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The revival of interest in tales of chivalry//</span><br />While interesting, you&#039;re stretching credibility a bit to delve into this much of a history lesson on the front page. Newspapers want to cram as many big headlines as they can on the front and relegate the details to the continuations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high speed//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The most famous experimenter was the maverick millionaire Buster Nimbus//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fog, thunderstorms, and hail showers//</span><br />Be consistent about whether you use an Oxford comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;old mares&#039; tale//</span><br />You&#039;re also inconsistent about the placement of the apostrophe here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the pegasus filly behind this story//</span><br />You need commas on both sides of an appositive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lightening//</span><br />While weather ponies could certainly create this effect, I believe you meant &quot;lightning.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lead//</span><br />The past tense of &quot;lead&quot; is &quot;led.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“We can make no further progress with the current trade minister,” she said, “he’s as stubborn as a mule.”//</span><br />Another case where you&#039;ve punctuated the quote as if both parts form a single sentence, but they don&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one day//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Red Rose said “The evidence is there for all to see.”//</span><br />Missing a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;p20//</span><br />Inconsistent with the capital letters you&#039;ve been using.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Far-East//</span><br />No reason to hyphenate this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A TEENAGE PEGASUS was responsible for an outrageous act of high altitude vandalism yesterday//</span><br />I doubt she&#039;d have been a teenager. She got her cutie mark doing that, which would place her about the same age as the present-day CMCs. They&#039;re portrayed as quite a bit younger than teenagers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then in a foalish hoax boasted that she had created a sonic rainboom.//</span><br />I doubt a professional reporter would use sentence fragments in an article.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well known//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fillies”,//</span><br />Comma goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;school for gifted unicorns//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t this be capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight Sparkle, a foalhood friend of Princess Mi Amore Cadenza//</span><br />Minor thing, but Twilight knew her very well, and yet didn&#039;t know that was her full name. Is it public knowledge?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;examiners notes//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rainbow coloured//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The demon spirit, imprisoned in the crystal then spoke to her//</span><br />There is no reason for that comma to be there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Daring Do and the Quest for the Sapphire Stone//</span><br />As a book title, this should be underlined or (preferably) italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with note on the door//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;P.3//</span><br />More inconsistent format.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Canterlot lawyer assigned to defend Miss Dash//</span><br />Another appositive that needs commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;physically harassing other students; being absent from class without good reason; and behaving in a way to bring the school into disrepute//</span><br />None of the list items have their own commas, so there&#039;s no reason to use semicolons here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Many reporters continued to ask her questions//</span><br />That just seems like a vague and pointless thing for an article to say. See my earlier comment about not wasting space on the front page.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her defence lawyer Twinkie Tulkinghorn explained://</span><br />You sure use this phrasing a lot. It&#039;s getting awfully repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;late night//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Council of Equestrian Regions//</span><br />Different capitalization than you used in the previous paper.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;much needed//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br />And to broader things.<br /><br />You have Suri Polomare as an adult here, but she certainly appeared to be the same age as Rarity, and her association with Rarity might indicate that as well. But you have Rainbow Dash still as a very young filly.<br /><br />Likewise, you have Daring Do books existing when Rainbow Dash was still a filly, implying Daring Do was going on adventures and a gifted writer already, yet she doesn&#039;t appear in canon to be any older than Dash. For that matter, you also imply that Lyra and Octavia are significantly older than Dash. In contrast, I thought it a rather nice touch that Cheerilee <i>wasn&#039;t</i> the teacher.<br /><br />The rainboom was supposed to have spread all across Equestria, but we only get very local takes on it from Ponyville, Cloudsdale, Canterlot, etc. Would it be possible to have a little more comprehensive coverage, say from Appleloosa, on what a more diverse cross-section of ponies thought?<br /><br />The last item is that the graphics are nearly impossible to read. I have to click on the images to blow them up, which meant I had to scroll sideways as well as down, and I had to back up a page to click to the next chapter. I don&#039;t know what FiMFiction&#039;s limits are on picture size and storage, but it&#039;d make it much easier to read if you sized the picture to fit the screen better by default.<br /><br />I did want to bring up a couple of other reservations I had but that I ultimately decided I could overlook. There really isn&#039;t much of a conflict here. Really the only thing at stake was whether Dash would get in trouble, but the treatment of that is so distant (and really, what lawyer would criticize his own client?) that it&#039;s not engaging <i>as</i> a conflict. It also spends a significant amount of space rehashing events and accounts we already know from canon. If not for the unique angle, this would be a problem. But at least on the conflict front, we do get a little in the form of this side narrative about the strike.<br /><br />As I said, this is a cute story, and I&#039;d like to see it posted. Just resubmit it when you&#039;re ready, and I&#039;ll have another glance.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 226

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She decided to keep an eye on her friend, and try to puzzle out what was so unnerving about what she had seen.//

>Pinkie answered, and started walking.//
Here are a couple of instances where it's all a single clause, so you don't need a comma with the conjunction.

>Cause I didn’t see it coming//

Needs an apostrophe for the elision. And watch it. Smart quotes like to draw leading apostrophes backward.

>Rainbow Dash seemed to brighten a little.//

Watch the perspective. Your story has been told from Dash's point of view so far, but this is external to her. She wouldn't make such a comment about how she seemed to look, since she knows exactly how she feels.

>Rainbow hovered next to Pinkie, but seemed a little afraid to touch her.//

Same thing again. But more than that, it's a little vague. What exactly does she do to make her seem afraid?

>Laying on the floor//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Rainbow and Spike quickly ran to a closet and began to clean up the mess//

Either she puked in the closet or you're missing some character action there.

>Pinkie was lying helpless on the floor//

Well, you got the verb right this time, but it's the same action you already had her do earlier in the paragraph.

>but Pinkie was still lying there//

…for the third time in two paragraphs.

>…oh dear//

Capitalize. She's not picking up an earlier sentence she'd left hanging.

>Rainbow Dash saluted and was out the door in a flash. Twilight turned to Spike, who was just putting away the cleaning supplies. “Spike, come help me. Let’s clean Pinkie up.”//

And here's another thing you have to watch with perspective. You'd been in Dash's, so once she leaves, she can't see what's happening here anymore. And it's really not worth transitioning to someone who can just to justify three sentences. There's a rationale behind this in the head hopping section at the top of this thread.

>Pinkie Pie was still washing when a knock on the door came.//

That's a big change. She was pretty much incapacitated, and now she can manage on her own? And Dash isn't surprised by the improvement?

>Twilight turned to her research, disturbed by Zecora’s remarks.//

Consider what this says. Only Twilight would know this, unless you present it as someone else interpreting her actions this way. It's okay to switch to her across the scene break, but it's a good idea to establish earlier in the scene who will hold it. That's why I didn't say anything about the first couple of sentences, which described things Dash couldn't see—I was waiting to see if she was still the perspective character. You don't want to leave me hanging like that unless the story had taken a decidedly omniscient tone from the start.

>Rainbow let go of her and she wobbled slightly.//

Here's an example of one that does need a comma, since there are two distinct subject/verb pairs, i.e., clauses. There are examples in the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>she chuckled//

It's starting to get grating (and repetitive) how often you use laughing as a speaking action.

>“Do you remember when you cloned yourself in the mirror pool?”//

This'll take a bit of explanation, I'm afraid. Her clones didn't share her memories. She had to teach them about Ponyville and her friends. Now it's possible she did clone herself. The plot suggests that the early clones did go back to do so, but I still don't see how she wouldn't know she was a clone due to lack of any memories before that day.

>You’d have to dive back into the pool. You would dissolve, and your memories would go back to the other Pinkie. If we brought her back out, then, she would have this Pinkie’s memories as well as her own.//

If that's true, wouldn't Pinkie have accumulated all the memories of all the clones? If not, then why not? At this point, I'll also encourage you to read the section on saidisms.

>“Well, Twilight… You see, thinking is like – is like making cupcakes.”//

…And the section on talking heads.

>… No.//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>18//

Write out numbers that short.

>The pair walked into a clearing and found themselves facing the mirror pool.//

They got there awful quickly…

>The pair walked into a clearing and found themselves facing the mirror pool.//

This is the first indication of perspective we get in the scene, with the possible exception of this:
>Twilight closed her eyes to suppress a tear//
The scene has been pretty omniscient. I'd encourage you to keep a consistent and clear perspective.

>I’m sorry Pinkie//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>For a moment, Twilight was paralyzed with fear. What if the real Pinkie didn’t come out? What if she didn’t want to? Or maybe she was dead after all?//

And now you're back in Twilight's head.

This was a nice idea, albeit one that's not exactly original. Still I liked it, but I think it's hampered by two main things.

First is the shifting and unclear perspective. Yes, all the characters have feeling, but there are ways of getting at those while staying within only one of them. She can interpret what she reads from the others, and you can get just as clear an emotional picture as if you'd jumped around to all of them. But by staying with a small number, the reader gets better settled with that one and identifies with her better. So when I spend portions of such a short story in Pinkie's head as well as Twilight's and Dash's. I never get that thorough a picture of any of them.

The other is related, but what emotional information I did get was fleeting. It was a very factual story and didn't dwell that much on how the characters felt. And be careful there—you might want to read the section on show versus tell to avoid the common pitfalls there.

But here's a long-time friend of Dash's, and she doesn't agonize much over what's happening. In fact, she's pretty quick to condemn the clone, then snap right back to considering her a friend. What's going through her head, either because I'm there with her or because I'm with another character who witnesses her behavior and describes it in a way that I can tell how she feels. Likewise, when Twilight knows the truth, but she's acting very stoically as Pinkie comes back from washing up—how does she feel there? Torn up about her friend? Scared to tell her the truth? Dash had to drag the explanation out of her, but Twilight didn't seem too upset about it. In short, really put yourself in each character's place and decide how you'd feel about the situation. You need to make those clear, authentic, and complex emotions come out of your writing. I think you're up to it, or I wouldn't have given you detailed feedback like this.

One other thing I'll mention is that Twilight very quickly figures out that the illusions will dissipate. If the information was that readily available, why didn't it come up back in the same time frame as the episode? Sure, she probably wouldn't want to leave that many Pinkies running around if she knew it'd take a year for them to disappear, but it's never even discussed.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She decided to keep an eye on her friend, and try to puzzle out what was so unnerving about what she had seen.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie answered, and started walking.//</span><br />Here are a couple of instances where it&#039;s all a single clause, so you don&#039;t need a comma with the conjunction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cause I didn’t see it coming//</span><br />Needs an apostrophe for the elision. And watch it. Smart quotes like to draw leading apostrophes backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash seemed to brighten a little.//</span><br />Watch the perspective. Your story has been told from Dash&#039;s point of view so far, but this is external to her. She wouldn&#039;t make such a comment about how she seemed to look, since she knows exactly how she feels.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow hovered next to Pinkie, but seemed a little afraid to touch her.//</span><br />Same thing again. But more than that, it&#039;s a little vague. What exactly does she do to make her seem afraid?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Laying on the floor//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow and Spike quickly ran to a closet and began to clean up the mess//</span><br />Either she puked in the closet or you&#039;re missing some character action there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie was lying helpless on the floor//</span><br />Well, you got the verb right this time, but it&#039;s the same action you already had her do earlier in the paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but Pinkie was still lying there//</span><br />…for the third time in two paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…oh dear//</span><br />Capitalize. She&#039;s not picking up an earlier sentence she&#039;d left hanging.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash saluted and was out the door in a flash. Twilight turned to Spike, who was just putting away the cleaning supplies. “Spike, come help me. Let’s clean Pinkie up.”//</span><br />And here&#039;s another thing you have to watch with perspective. You&#039;d been in Dash&#039;s, so once she leaves, she can&#039;t see what&#039;s happening here anymore. And it&#039;s really not worth transitioning to someone who can just to justify three sentences. There&#039;s a rationale behind this in the head hopping section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie was still washing when a knock on the door came.//</span><br />That&#039;s a big change. She was pretty much incapacitated, and now she can manage on her own? And Dash isn&#039;t surprised by the improvement?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight turned to her research, disturbed by Zecora’s remarks.//</span><br />Consider what this says. Only Twilight would know this, unless you present it as someone else interpreting her actions this way. It&#039;s okay to switch to her across the scene break, but it&#039;s a good idea to establish earlier in the scene who will hold it. That&#039;s why I didn&#039;t say anything about the first couple of sentences, which described things Dash couldn&#039;t see—I was waiting to see if she was still the perspective character. You don&#039;t want to leave me hanging like that unless the story had taken a decidedly omniscient tone from the start.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow let go of her and she wobbled slightly.//</span><br />Here&#039;s an example of one that does need a comma, since there are two distinct subject/verb pairs, i.e., clauses. There are examples in the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she chuckled//</span><br />It&#039;s starting to get grating (and repetitive) how often you use laughing as a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Do you remember when you cloned yourself in the mirror pool?”//</span><br />This&#039;ll take a bit of explanation, I&#039;m afraid. Her clones didn&#039;t share her memories. She had to teach them about Ponyville and her friends. Now it&#039;s possible she did clone herself. The plot suggests that the early clones did go back to do so, but I still don&#039;t see how she wouldn&#039;t know she was a clone due to lack of any memories before that day.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You’d have to dive back into the pool. You would dissolve, and your memories would go back to the other Pinkie. If we brought her back out, then, she would have this Pinkie’s memories as well as her own.//</span><br />If that&#039;s true, wouldn&#039;t Pinkie have accumulated all the memories of all the clones? If not, then why not? At this point, I&#039;ll also encourage you to read the section on saidisms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Well, Twilight… You see, thinking is like – is like making cupcakes.”//</span><br />…And the section on talking heads.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;… No.//</span><br />Don&#039;t leave a space after a leading ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;18//</span><br />Write out numbers that short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pair walked into a clearing and found themselves facing the mirror pool.//</span><br />They got there awful quickly…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pair walked into a clearing and found themselves facing the mirror pool.//</span><br />This is the first indication of perspective we get in the scene, with the possible exception of this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight closed her eyes to suppress a tear//</span><br />The scene has been pretty omniscient. I&#039;d encourage you to keep a consistent and clear perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sorry Pinkie//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For a moment, Twilight was paralyzed with fear. What if the real Pinkie didn’t come out? What if she didn’t want to? Or maybe she was dead after all?//</span><br />And now you&#039;re back in Twilight&#039;s head.<br /><br />This was a nice idea, albeit one that&#039;s not exactly original. Still I liked it, but I think it&#039;s hampered by two main things.<br /><br />First is the shifting and unclear perspective. Yes, all the characters have feeling, but there are ways of getting at those while staying within only one of them. She can interpret what she reads from the others, and you can get just as clear an emotional picture as if you&#039;d jumped around to all of them. But by staying with a small number, the reader gets better settled with that one and identifies with her better. So when I spend portions of such a short story in Pinkie&#039;s head as well as Twilight&#039;s and Dash&#039;s. I never get that thorough a picture of any of them.<br /><br />The other is related, but what emotional information I did get was fleeting. It was a very factual story and didn&#039;t dwell that much on how the characters felt. And be careful there—you might want to read the section on show versus tell to avoid the common pitfalls there.<br /><br />But here&#039;s a long-time friend of Dash&#039;s, and she doesn&#039;t agonize much over what&#039;s happening. In fact, she&#039;s pretty quick to condemn the clone, then snap right back to considering her a friend. What&#039;s going through her head, either because I&#039;m there with her or because I&#039;m with another character who witnesses her behavior and describes it in a way that I can tell how she feels. Likewise, when Twilight knows the truth, but she&#039;s acting very stoically as Pinkie comes back from washing up—how does she feel there? Torn up about her friend? Scared to tell her the truth? Dash had to drag the explanation out of her, but Twilight didn&#039;t seem too upset about it. In short, really put yourself in each character&#039;s place and decide how you&#039;d feel about the situation. You need to make those clear, authentic, and complex emotions come out of your writing. I think you&#039;re up to it, or I wouldn&#039;t have given you detailed feedback like this.<br /><br />One other thing I&#039;ll mention is that Twilight very quickly figures out that the illusions will dissipate. If the information was that readily available, why didn&#039;t it come up back in the same time frame as the episode? Sure, she probably wouldn&#039;t want to leave that many Pinkies running around if she knew it&#039;d take a year for them to disappear, but it&#039;s never even discussed.<br />

The Synthesis of Pinkie Pie (Story No. 130783) SuukorakCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 227

>>130783
First of all, thanks for taking the time to read and respond in such detail to my story. It's my second pony story ever (and my first submission to EQD), so I'm happy it's been able to come this far already.
Most of your critique is valid and well taken. I got a little careless with the grammar, I will admit, and some of the action and speaking is unclear or repetitive. Some others complained about the pacing of the story, which is also a possible issue. However, two things you mentioned might do with a little more attention.
The first thing is the perspective. I usually write with an omniscient narrator, as I tried to do here. The fact that someone with as much experience as you mistook that narrator to be speaking from Rainbow's perspective means that I messed up pretty seriously, somehow. Do you have any advice on how to fix that?
Second, your plot/continuity objections to the story. It's true that the clones in the episode had no memory of Pinkie's past. Nonetheless, if I stuck rigidly to the episode's mechanics, there wouldn't be much of a story left. In fact, the episode itself has some problems with the mechanics, which I won't get into because I'm not here to rant. In short, I hoped to take some artistic license with the precise details of Pinkie's clones. If it detracts too much from the story I can come up with some excuses and throw them in, but I figured it's better to keep Twilight's lectures on quantum mirror mechanics and virtual Pinkies to a minimum.
Once again, thanks for your comments. I will take them to heart and make a thorough revision of the story. If I understand correctly, EQD's "strike system" that it occasionally mentions is no longer in effect, so once I've revised I can resubmit with impunity.
Anyways, thank you very much. I hope you enjoyed my story.>>130783
>>130783

-Suukorak<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130783" onclick="return highlight('130783', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130783">&gt;&gt;130783</a><br />First of all, thanks for taking the time to read and respond in such detail to my story. It&#039;s my second pony story ever (and my first submission to EQD), so I&#039;m happy it&#039;s been able to come this far already.<br />Most of your critique is valid and well taken. I got a little careless with the grammar, I will admit, and some of the action and speaking is unclear or repetitive. Some others complained about the pacing of the story, which is also a possible issue. However, two things you mentioned might do with a little more attention.<br />The first thing is the perspective. I usually write with an omniscient narrator, as I tried to do here. The fact that someone with as much experience as you mistook that narrator to be speaking from Rainbow&#039;s perspective means that I messed up pretty seriously, somehow. Do you have any advice on how to fix that?<br />Second, your plot/continuity objections to the story. It&#039;s true that the clones in the episode had no memory of Pinkie&#039;s past. Nonetheless, if I stuck rigidly to the episode&#039;s mechanics, there wouldn&#039;t be much of a story left. In fact, the episode itself has some problems with the mechanics, which I won&#039;t get into because I&#039;m not here to rant. In short, I hoped to take some artistic license with the precise details of Pinkie&#039;s clones. If it detracts too much from the story I can come up with some excuses and throw them in, but I figured it&#039;s better to keep Twilight&#039;s lectures on quantum mirror mechanics and virtual Pinkies to a minimum.<br />Once again, thanks for your comments. I will take them to heart and make a thorough revision of the story. If I understand correctly, EQD&#039;s &quot;strike system&quot; that it occasionally mentions is no longer in effect, so once I&#039;ve revised I can resubmit with impunity.<br />Anyways, thank you very much. I hope you enjoyed my story.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130783" onclick="return highlight('130783', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130783">&gt;&gt;130783</a><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130783" onclick="return highlight('130783', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130783">&gt;&gt;130783</a><br /><br />-Suukorak<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 228

>>130790
Sorry it took me this long to respond. I've been off the reviewing grid for a couple of days.

Yes, our strike system is mostly gone. The only way you get a strike now is if after you resubmit, the reviewer can't tell that you put any effort into revision. Basically, if it has all the same problems in the same amounts, we'll give it a strike.

As to the narrator, you have to watch for places where he says things that only one character would know, and he phrases it as if it's from his experience rather than the character's. This actually doesn't come up that often, so I'll get to the more common issue: when the narrator expresses one of the character's opinions or emotions for her.

It's the difference between something like:
That was a big cake!

and

Pinkie thought that was a big cake
or
That was a big cake, Pinkie thought.

An omniscient narrator will be careful to attribute subjective judgments to the characters, while a limited one can state judgments as his own.

To throw a monkey wrench into the works, there are exceptions. Primarily, if the omniscient narrator is identified as a character himself, who generally has no direct involvement, but observes the action. Something like a god peering down and seeing what's happening. Then he can express opinions, as long as they're actually his. He still needs to separate his thoughts from the characters'.

Here are a few examples of narration that express opinions or thoughts that the character would have:

Rainbow Dash:
>It was magnificent to be up here, to be able to live and work every day in three dimensions. Then again, it was magnificent just to be Rainbow Dash. And this new move would prove it to them.

Unclear, but presumably Twilight (the narrator is making a judgment call in using "seem," where he should only be dealing in facts, if he's truly omniscient):
>Rainbow Dash seemed to brighten a little.

Either Dash or Twilight (the emphasis indicates an emotional reaction):
>And Pinkie rippled.

Pinkie (nobody else would know this about her, unless the evidence they observed to make the judgment is presented to me as well):
>It was all Pinkie could do to try to stay upright.

Dash (same deal—only she knows why she winced):
>Rainbow wincing with empathy

Granted, some of these can be pretty nitpicky. I'm not going to ding you for having a few of these, but I hope you get the picture. However, some are very blatant, like this one:
>Would she find that Pinkie was going to die?

Here, the narrator is presenting Twilight's internal thought for her. This is the very epitome of a limited narrator.

That said, a limited narrator may actually work best for a story that has a heavy emotional investment like this one. This is just my opinion, but I use limited narration most often, and I reserve omniscient for stories where you don't need to forge a deep connection between the character and the reader, like a light comedy or an action story. Even then, limited narration can still work. It's actually harder to write a purely omniscient story than people think. Most will naturally go to a shallow limited perspective that wavers between characters when they don't pay attention to it.

Finally, as to whether Pinkie would share memories with this clone or the previous ones… You could probably patch together a reasonable explanation in a couple of sentences, but this wasn't a big sticking point. Yes, it's normal to take liberties on a couple of points to make a premise, and if you don't address this, it's okay.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130790" onclick="return highlight('130790', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130790">&gt;&gt;130790</a><br />Sorry it took me this long to respond. I&#039;ve been off the reviewing grid for a couple of days.<br /><br />Yes, our strike system is mostly gone. The only way you get a strike now is if after you resubmit, the reviewer can&#039;t tell that you put any effort into revision. Basically, if it has all the same problems in the same amounts, we&#039;ll give it a strike.<br /><br />As to the narrator, you have to watch for places where he says things that only one character would know, and he phrases it as if it&#039;s from his experience rather than the character&#039;s. This actually doesn&#039;t come up that often, so I&#039;ll get to the more common issue: when the narrator expresses one of the character&#039;s opinions or emotions for her.<br /><br />It&#039;s the difference between something like:<br />That was a big cake!<br /><br />and<br /><br />Pinkie thought that was a big cake<br />or<br /><i>That was a big cake</i>, Pinkie thought.<br /><br />An omniscient narrator will be careful to attribute subjective judgments to the characters, while a limited one can state judgments as his own.<br /><br />To throw a monkey wrench into the works, there are exceptions. Primarily, if the omniscient narrator is identified as a character himself, who generally has no direct involvement, but observes the action. Something like a god peering down and seeing what&#039;s happening. Then he can express opinions, as long as they&#039;re actually his. He still needs to separate his thoughts from the characters&#039;.<br /><br />Here are a few examples of narration that express opinions or thoughts that the character would have:<br /><br />Rainbow Dash:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was magnificent to be up here, to be able to live and work every day in three dimensions. Then again, it was magnificent just to be Rainbow Dash. And this new move would prove it to them.</span><br /><br />Unclear, but presumably Twilight (the narrator is making a judgment call in using &quot;seem,&quot; where he should only be dealing in facts, if he&#039;s truly omniscient):<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash seemed to brighten a little.</span><br /><br />Either Dash or Twilight (the emphasis indicates an emotional reaction):<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And Pinkie <i>rippled</i>.</span><br /><br />Pinkie (nobody else would know this about her, unless the evidence they observed to make the judgment is presented to me as well):<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was all Pinkie could do to try to stay upright.</span><br /><br />Dash (same deal—only she knows why she winced):<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow wincing with empathy</span><br /><br />Granted, some of these can be pretty nitpicky. I&#039;m not going to ding you for having a few of these, but I hope you get the picture. However, some are very blatant, like this one:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Would she find that Pinkie was going to die?</span><br /><br />Here, the narrator is presenting Twilight&#039;s internal thought for her. This is the very epitome of a limited narrator.<br /><br />That said, a limited narrator may actually work best for a story that has a heavy emotional investment like this one. This is just my opinion, but I use limited narration most often, and I reserve omniscient for stories where you don&#039;t need to forge a deep connection between the character and the reader, like a light comedy or an action story. Even then, limited narration can still work. It&#039;s actually harder to write a purely omniscient story than people think. Most will naturally go to a shallow limited perspective that wavers between characters when they don&#039;t pay attention to it.<br /><br />Finally, as to whether Pinkie would share memories with this clone or the previous ones… You could probably patch together a reasonable explanation in a couple of sentences, but this wasn&#039;t a big sticking point. Yes, it&#039;s normal to take liberties on a couple of points to make a premise, and if you don&#039;t address this, it&#039;s okay.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 229

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>a look of puzzlement adorning her face//

Better to describe it to me and get me to figure out she's puzzled. There's a longer description in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>A bit of anger welled up inside Fluttershy's heart//

Same thing again. This was a recurring issue with the story.

>Pinkie frowned and her hopping ceased.//

Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions. I've spotted a few of these throughout the story, both ones that need a comma and ones that shouldn't have one but do.

>shouting words of encouragement//

Repetitive with the use of "encouragingly" in the last paragraph, but honestly, I'd say to leave this alone and kill that previous adverb.

>Fluttershy breathed a sigh of relief.//

Telly, and of a specific type I noted in the show versus tell discussion. In short, you can lose the "of relief" without harming anything.

>Oh, hello little fellow.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>awe inspiring//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>while still chirping//

This is the third mention of a chirp in as many paragraphs and the second in this one. It's getting repetitive.

>the energetic mare//

You just used such a descriptor for her in the last paragraph, and then you use one later in this paragraph to refer to Fluttershy. Read the section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.

>Both ponies eyes//

Missing a possessive in there.

>She shook her head as if trying to shake//

This is borderline, but it;s not really an effective simile that likens an action to itself.

>“She's bleeding really badly. I need to stop it!”//

Formatting issue with the line break here.

>tourniquet//

She has a head wound. I really don't think this is what she should be using.

>her’s//

There is no such word.

>She had long since had feelings for the pink menace she affectionately called Pinkie.//

You had me until here. It's an irrevocably cliched thing for two characters to have coincidentally secret feelings for each other that are both revealed when circumstances force it. Furthermore, it makes for uninteresting romance, as there's no struggle to get the relationship going. It's just ready-made. You have to do something to stand out from the ton of shipping stories we get, and so many have this exact type of plot.

>punchbowl//

Two words.

>gurneys//

This is much closer to a litter.

>The wooden gurney was finally ready for use, she only had one problem.//

Comma splice. You have two complete sentences stitched together with a comma.

>careful not to let her head move//

Descriptive phrases like this are usually set off with a comma.

>flexed his muscles//

He just did that. It sounds repetitive unless you do something to note the repetition so the reader knows it isn't just an oversight.

>Whut//

Don't go overboard on their accent. Really, how would this be pronounced differently that "what"? The reader knows what they sound like. He'll fill most of it in for you. It's more about phrasing and word choice than imitating the accent.

>"Excuse me, Fluttershy. Where's the patient?" Dr. Trotting asked.//

>The doctor nodded and galloped upstairs with his bag.//
These two have very different moods. In the first, he's bothering with pleasantries and doesn't seem overly concerned. In the second, he's acting like it's a dire situation. You need to be consistent.

>Pinkie Pie fell down the crossing//

Repetitive use of "crossing." But I have no reason to think AJ would know what she's talking about. She'd only mentioned taking Rarity up there before. So how would AJ know what she'd been doing or where she went? A short explanation of where it happened might do you good here for credibility.

>for awhile//

Minor point, but you need a noun to serve as the object of the preposition, so it should really be "a while" here.

>"Bye, doctor."

>
>"Thanks a bunch, doc!"//
These are essentially titles, so they should be capitalized as terms of address.

>Iff'n//

Just one "f"

>Oh yeah. I guess somepony should let 'em know. You run along and tell em, sugarcube.//

Inconsistent use of an apostrophe on "em."

>nig—//

Either get rid of the g or add the h. This suggests she actually pronounces the g.

>barely-audible//

You don't need the hyphen in a two-word phrase where the first is an -ly adverb.

>Rainbow Dash would have caught you!//

Why's she so fixated on Dash? Rarity or Twilight would have been able to help her too. Applejack, on the other hand… which is interesting, since she's the other one involved here.

>Hi Fluttershy!//

Missing comma for direct address.

>They each looked anxious//

How so?

>hovering around the room with a present.//

You already mentioned they had gifts.

>“Cool! I’ll race you to the top of the stairs!” Rainbow yelled, taking off at blinding speed.//

Look at how the structure of these exchanges gets repetitive. It's always "Dialogue," attribution, optional action.

>albeit, less enthusiastically//

No reason for that comma to be there.

>She put water in one, and a teabag in the other. As she put water on to boil//

Repetitive phrasing.

>She dropped a few cubes of ice into the glass of water and sat down, patiently waiting for the water to boil.//

Makes it sound like she's trying to boil the ice water.

>Y'all//

As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it's quite rare to hear this word used as a singular.

>and then, a blinding light//

No reason for that comma, either.

>The plate of cupcakes and water she prepared sitting in her outstretched hooves.//

It's okay to use sentence fragments for stylistic effect, but I haven't seen any until now, so it just feels out of place. They also work best as stream-of-consciousness things or follow-up comments, and this is neither.

>bed."//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>Would you… be my special somepony?//

The rushed agreement to start a relationship is pretty cliched, too.

>But,//

No comma.

The stylistic problems are mostly with the telly language. There are a few conversations that get talking heads (there's a discussion on that up top as well).

The bigger issue is that this is so much like any number of other stories we get. Two ponies secretly like each other but have never admitted it, something forces that information into the open, they declare that they like each other (perhaps after a bit of hoof-wringing), they start the relationship, the end.

You have to do something to stand out above that crowd. Here are a few things that pop into my mind immediately, and this certainly isn't a laundry list of things you have to do. It's just what I said: a few directions you could go that would make this story less of a cliche and more of an engaging read. Take them or leave them as you see fit.

The situation where Fluttershy finds out Pinkie likes her, and Fluttershy conveniently reciprocates, is present in so many shipping stories. It's more interesting when Fluttershy didn't suspect, so the story can delve into what she thinks about that. It can be a nice read to see her re-evaluate her attitude toward Pinkie now that she sees her in a different light. But be careful not to sink into the "do I really like mares?" angst. That's rather overdone, too.

We're also just thrown into a situation where they already like each other. We know they do simply because the narrator tells us so. But it's never proven to me. In some stories, this can mean backtracking to when they first meet to show the relationship grow from the beginning. In others, it can be through flashbacks or short anecdotes. For instance, the sight of a particular flower along the road might remind Fluttershy of a time something happened where she found Pinkie endearing. It's not enough just to put two characters together. You need to show me that they actually have chemistry together, that they have real reasons for liking each other, or it's a bland fact.

I suspect you don't want to take on a bigger scope to the story than you already have, but it's another cliche for the story to end right as the couple gets together, or has their first kiss, or whatever. That's really the beginning of the story. It's actually hard to find shipping stories that don't do this, however.

That said, the writing here wasn't bad at all, and the situational setup of having Fluttershy give Pinkie emergency treatment was a nice touch.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a look of puzzlement adorning her face//</span><br />Better to describe it to me and get me to figure out she&#039;s puzzled. There&#039;s a longer description in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A bit of anger welled up inside Fluttershy&#039;s heart//</span><br />Same thing again. This was a recurring issue with the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie frowned and her hopping ceased.//</span><br />Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions. I&#039;ve spotted a few of these throughout the story, both ones that need a comma and ones that shouldn&#039;t have one but do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shouting words of encouragement//</span><br />Repetitive with the use of &quot;encouragingly&quot; in the last paragraph, but honestly, I&#039;d say to leave this alone and kill that previous adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy breathed a sigh of relief.//</span><br />Telly, and of a specific type I noted in the show versus tell discussion. In short, you can lose the &quot;of relief&quot; without harming anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, hello little fellow.//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;awe inspiring//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while still chirping//</span><br />This is the third mention of a chirp in as many paragraphs and the second in this one. It&#039;s getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the energetic mare//</span><br />You just used such a descriptor for her in the last paragraph, and then you use one later in this paragraph to refer to Fluttershy. Read the section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Both ponies eyes//</span><br />Missing a possessive in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She shook her head as if trying to shake//</span><br />This is borderline, but it;s not really an effective simile that likens an action to itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“She&#039;s bleeding really badly. I need to stop it!”//</span><br />Formatting issue with the line break here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tourniquet//</span><br />She has a head wound. I really don&#039;t think this is what she should be using.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her’s//</span><br />There is no such word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had long since had feelings for the pink menace she affectionately called Pinkie.//</span><br />You had me until here. It&#039;s an irrevocably cliched thing for two characters to have coincidentally secret feelings for each other that are both revealed when circumstances force it. Furthermore, it makes for uninteresting romance, as there&#039;s no struggle to get the relationship going. It&#039;s just ready-made. You have to do something to stand out from the ton of shipping stories we get, and so many have this exact type of plot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;punchbowl//</span><br />Two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gurneys//</span><br />This is much closer to a litter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The wooden gurney was finally ready for use, she only had one problem.//</span><br />Comma splice. You have two complete sentences stitched together with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;careful not to let her head move//</span><br />Descriptive phrases like this are usually set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flexed his muscles//</span><br />He just did that. It sounds repetitive unless you do something to note the repetition so the reader knows it isn&#039;t just an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Whut//</span><br />Don&#039;t go overboard on their accent. Really, how would this be pronounced differently that &quot;what&quot;? The reader knows what they sound like. He&#039;ll fill most of it in for you. It&#039;s more about phrasing and word choice than imitating the accent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Excuse me, Fluttershy. Where&#039;s the patient?&quot; Dr. Trotting asked.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The doctor nodded and galloped upstairs with his bag.//</span><br />These two have very different moods. In the first, he&#039;s bothering with pleasantries and doesn&#039;t seem overly concerned. In the second, he&#039;s acting like it&#039;s a dire situation. You need to be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie fell down the crossing//</span><br />Repetitive use of &quot;crossing.&quot; But I have no reason to think AJ would know what she&#039;s talking about. She&#039;d only mentioned taking Rarity up there before. So how would AJ know what she&#039;d been doing or where she went? A short explanation of where it happened might do you good here for credibility.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for awhile//</span><br />Minor point, but you need a noun to serve as the object of the preposition, so it should really be &quot;a while&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Bye, doctor.&quot;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Thanks a bunch, doc!&quot;//</span><br />These are essentially titles, so they should be capitalized as terms of address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Iff&#039;n//</span><br />Just one &quot;f&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh yeah. I guess somepony should let &#039;em know. You run along and tell em, sugarcube.//</span><br />Inconsistent use of an apostrophe on &quot;em.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nig—//</span><br />Either get rid of the g or add the h. This suggests she actually pronounces the g.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;barely-audible//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the hyphen in a two-word phrase where the first is an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash would have caught you!//</span><br />Why&#039;s she so fixated on Dash? Rarity or Twilight would have been able to help her too. Applejack, on the other hand… which is interesting, since she&#039;s the other one involved here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hi Fluttershy!//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They each looked anxious//</span><br />How so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hovering around the room with a present.//</span><br />You already mentioned they had gifts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Cool! I’ll race you to the top of the stairs!” Rainbow yelled, taking off at blinding speed.//</span><br />Look at how the structure of these exchanges gets repetitive. It&#039;s always &quot;Dialogue,&quot; attribution, optional action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;albeit, less enthusiastically//</span><br />No reason for that comma to be there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She put water in one, and a teabag in the other. As she put water on to boil//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She dropped a few cubes of ice into the glass of water and sat down, patiently waiting for the water to boil.//</span><br />Makes it sound like she&#039;s trying to boil the ice water.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Y&#039;all//</span><br />As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it&#039;s quite rare to hear this word used as a singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and then, a blinding light//</span><br />No reason for that comma, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The plate of cupcakes and water she prepared sitting in her outstretched hooves.//</span><br />It&#039;s okay to use sentence fragments for stylistic effect, but I haven&#039;t seen any until now, so it just feels out of place. They also work best as stream-of-consciousness things or follow-up comments, and this is neither.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bed.&quot;//</span><br />Extraneous quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Would you… be my special somepony?//</span><br />The rushed agreement to start a relationship is pretty cliched, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But,//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br />The stylistic problems are mostly with the telly language. There are a few conversations that get talking heads (there&#039;s a discussion on that up top as well).<br /><br />The bigger issue is that this is so much like any number of other stories we get. Two ponies secretly like each other but have never admitted it, something forces that information into the open, they declare that they like each other (perhaps after a bit of hoof-wringing), they start the relationship, the end.<br /><br />You have to do something to stand out above that crowd. Here are a few things that pop into my mind immediately, and this certainly isn&#039;t a laundry list of things you have to do. It&#039;s just what I said: a few directions you could go that would make this story less of a cliche and more of an engaging read. Take them or leave them as you see fit.<br /><br />The situation where Fluttershy finds out Pinkie likes her, and Fluttershy conveniently reciprocates, is present in so many shipping stories. It&#039;s more interesting when Fluttershy didn&#039;t suspect, so the story can delve into what she thinks about that. It can be a nice read to see her re-evaluate her attitude toward Pinkie now that she sees her in a different light. But be careful not to sink into the &quot;do I really like mares?&quot; angst. That&#039;s rather overdone, too.<br /><br />We&#039;re also just thrown into a situation where they already like each other. We know they do simply because the narrator tells us so. But it&#039;s never proven to me. In some stories, this can mean backtracking to when they first meet to show the relationship grow from the beginning. In others, it can be through flashbacks or short anecdotes. For instance, the sight of a particular flower along the road might remind Fluttershy of a time something happened where she found Pinkie endearing. It&#039;s not enough just to put two characters together. You need to show me that they actually have chemistry together, that they have real reasons for liking each other, or it&#039;s a bland fact.<br /><br />I suspect you don&#039;t want to take on a bigger scope to the story than you already have, but it&#039;s another cliche for the story to end right as the couple gets together, or has their first kiss, or whatever. That&#039;s really the beginning of the story. It&#039;s actually hard to find shipping stories that don&#039;t do this, however.<br /><br />That said, the writing here wasn&#039;t bad at all, and the situational setup of having Fluttershy give Pinkie emergency treatment was a nice touch.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 230

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Her beloved teacher looked angry.//

Best to show me how that looks and let me make my own judgment. There's an explanation in the show versus tell section at the top of this thread.

>P—Princess?//

Use a hyphen for a stutter.

>"Twilight Sparkle," Celestia's eyes sharpened, "you just had my sister relive the most painful memories of her life. She came to me in tears."//

You can't just wedge any item between quotes with a comma. It has to be a speaking action, otherwise punctuate it as an aside:
"Twilight Sparkle—" Celestia's eyes sharpened "—you just had my sister relive the most painful memories of her life. She came to me in tears."

>But, but she was having fun!//

You're kind of taking a revisionist history here. The episode felt more like Luna's appearance was by tradition from before her banishment and that was subsequently adapted afterward, not something Twilight engineered. This is particularly so because Twilight didn't seem to expect it. She acted more surprised at the nature of Luna's appearance, not excited. That would really require her to hold the idiot ball if she thought Luna would be comfortable playing that role without even asking her and preparing the townsfolk beforehand. Not every reader will have this problem with it, but I think it's a pretty big logical leap.

>Seeing how mortified Twilight was, she allowed herself to soften somewhat.//

Why are you switching to Celestia's perspective? You'd taken a limited point of view from Twilight's head. You have to consider perspective shifts very carefully. There's a rationale given in the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>I hear they make excellent pastries//

By "Luna Eclipsed," Celestia had already been there. She visited in "A Bird in the Hoof."

>Luna came out of her reverie and gasped, seeing how much she had upset Twilight.//

And now you're popping into Luna's head. You can still get at the emotions of both characters from a single perspective. One just has to be framed as the other's perception. Or if it really is necessary to change perspectives, at least stay there long enough to make it worthwhile.

>a single tear//

This is incredibly cliched.

>she cut off//

It's unnecessary to narrate cutoffs and trailing off, since it's already evident from the punctuation.

>I am pleased to have spent time getting to know my subjects; to have had fun with them.//

Misused semicolon. What follows it doesn't contain an independent clause.

>Luna was showing her that, in spite of everything, she had enjoyed the celebration as well as Twilight's company.//

This would carry a lot more power if we got to see at last one anecdote from it.

I liked the tone you struck, and the writing is good, but it has what I think is a pretty serious plot hole. It's a little below our required word count, and while we can waive that, we'll only do so for stories that stand out as exceptional.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her beloved teacher looked angry.//</span><br />Best to show me how that looks and let me make my own judgment. There&#039;s an explanation in the show versus tell section at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;P—Princess?//</span><br />Use a hyphen for a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Twilight Sparkle,&quot; Celestia&#039;s eyes sharpened, &quot;you just had my sister relive the most painful memories of her life. She came to me in tears.&quot;//</span><br />You can&#039;t just wedge any item between quotes with a comma. It has to be a speaking action, otherwise punctuate it as an aside:<br />&quot;Twilight Sparkle—&quot; Celestia&#039;s eyes sharpened &quot;—you just had my sister relive the most painful memories of her life. She came to me in tears.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But, but she was having fun!//</span><br />You&#039;re kind of taking a revisionist history here. The episode felt more like Luna&#039;s appearance was by tradition from before her banishment and that was subsequently adapted afterward, not something Twilight engineered. This is particularly so because Twilight didn&#039;t seem to expect it. She acted more surprised at the nature of Luna&#039;s appearance, not excited. That would really require her to hold the idiot ball if she thought Luna would be comfortable playing that role without even asking her and preparing the townsfolk beforehand. Not every reader will have this problem with it, but I think it&#039;s a pretty big logical leap.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Seeing how mortified Twilight was, she allowed herself to soften somewhat.//</span><br />Why are you switching to Celestia&#039;s perspective? You&#039;d taken a limited point of view from Twilight&#039;s head. You have to consider perspective shifts very carefully. There&#039;s a rationale given in the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hear they make excellent pastries//</span><br />By &quot;Luna Eclipsed,&quot; Celestia had already been there. She visited in &quot;A Bird in the Hoof.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna came out of her reverie and gasped, seeing how much she had upset Twilight.//</span><br />And now you&#039;re popping into Luna&#039;s head. You can still get at the emotions of both characters from a single perspective. One just has to be framed as the other&#039;s perception. Or if it really is necessary to change perspectives, at least stay there long enough to make it worthwhile.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a single tear//</span><br />This is incredibly cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she cut off//</span><br />It&#039;s unnecessary to narrate cutoffs and trailing off, since it&#039;s already evident from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am pleased to have spent time getting to know my subjects; to have had fun with them.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. What follows it doesn&#039;t contain an independent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna was showing her that, in spite of everything, she had enjoyed the celebration as well as Twilight&#039;s company.//</span><br />This would carry a lot more power if we got to see at last one anecdote from it.<br /><br />I liked the tone you struck, and the writing is good, but it has what I think is a pretty serious plot hole. It&#039;s a little below our required word count, and while we can waive that, we&#039;ll only do so for stories that stand out as exceptional.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 231

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Twi//

When has Spike ever called her this?

>first century//

Needs a hyphen as a compound modifier.

>probably to go find his spelunking gear//

You haven't established a perspective until now, so you'd apparently chosen an omniscient narrator, but this dips into Twilight's head. Might want to make your perspective more consistent.

>quickly overtaken by a minor book avalanche//

How would this not get Spike's attention? He hasn't been gone long, so he couldn't be far away.

>pushing stray books to side//

Missing a word.

>heavily-faded//

Conversely, you don't need a hyphen in a two-word phrase with an -ly adverb.

>Insane Edicts: A Legal History of Equestria//

Book titles are underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>Twilight opened the book and read the inside of the cover where a short synopsis was written.//

Missing a comma for the dependent clause. This happens in the synopsis as well.

>known as one of the most respectable societies in the known//

Watch the word repetition.

>to chronicles//

Verb form.

>with detached disinterest//

The spot where we first meet this character is not the time to get telly.

>20//

Write out numbers this short.

>At least Luna had provided some entertainment.//

We don't get to see any of it? Just this oblique reference? That's pretty unsatisfying.

>Weather Pegasi Union//

Noun adjuncts are singular.

>a rather boorish pegasus stallion//

Given that he's speaking for a pegasus union, it's redundant to tell me he's a pegasus.

>started banging her hoof on the desk//

I've never seen much point in these "start" and "begin" actions that authors like to use so much. It's obvious that any given action will start. It's only worth mentioning if the beginning is noteworthy, as in an abrupt change or the action never finishes for some reason. Here, if you'd just said, "banged her hoof on the desk," what difference would it make?

>All the gathered senators looked up to see an angry Celestia, her mane like roiling water as it tumbled about.//

You started the scene in Celestia's perspective, so why are you backing out into a collective point of view of the assembly? And for only a single sentence?

>Worthington…shire…fields…ville//

Boo for Mr. Deeds reference.

>brows, but//

Extraneous space.

>half-eaten by the looks of it//

And again, from some unspecified perspective outside Celestia. I don't see a reason for this. If you don't want her holding the perspective, then pick a specific character to hold it, or keep things omniscient. Or if you have to change perspective, don't jump around frequently or abruptly. The rationale is given at the top of this thread in the section on head hopping.

>sounded like she was chewing on asphalt//

I have no idea what that would sound like. Other than clicking against her teeth, I suppose, but asphalt is just a hard substance. It wouldn't sound any different than any other hard object, so I don't know why you picked it. It doesn't serve a thematic purpose, and it wouldn't have any importance to her or the narrator, so I'm not sure what it achieves.

>which were far more interesting anyway, he assured himself//

And now into his perspective. You do get some leeway in comedy for doing so, but this is happening an awful lot, and the time you spent in a muddle of collective crowd minds was odd.

>only lasting about a month or so until Celestia finally got tired of the whole thing the government collapsed//

Syntax is off.

>eventually being rebuilt a week later just as it had been before//

Clunky to tack two participles together like you have here.

>read Twilight as she flipped to the last page in the chapter//

So was the preceding scene a flashback, or was it actually written in the book that way? Because I can't see a historical account including dialogue and switching perspective like that, but it comes across that way.

>the name of the author of the book//

A prime example of why these indirect possessions are so clunky. There are times when it's worth flipping them to create emphasis, but there's no reason here. "The author's name" is so much more direct and concise, and what does it lose?

>titled,//

This isn't dialogue. You don't need the comma.

>setting aside the paperwork for the orphanage she was filling out//

The ordering of your phrases inibits clarity here. It sounds like she's filling out an orphanage, whis is rather… grim.

>He looked nervous//

This telly language is hardly necessary, since you go on to describe him as looking nervous well enough anyway.

>nervous, Celestia could tell, from the way his eyes shifted about, and he shuffled his hooves nervously//

So, he's nervous, you say?

>your highness//

Capitalize the honorific.

>princess//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>Staring out at the regal city of Canterlot, the breeze flowed through her mane.

A classic dangling participle. "Staring out at the regal city of Canterlot" describes Celestia, but she doesn't appear in the sentence. This explicitly says that the breeze stared at the city.

>“Moon gazing, I’ll make it illegal.”//

This gives her a rather antagonistic approach to her own sister which is completely unsupported by canon, and in fact directly contradicts it. Not that you can't go there, but you have to connect the dots to explain why she'd reasonably feel this way.

>captain//

Ranks and titles would also be capitalized as terms of direct address.

>which made him visibly uncomfortable//

How so?

>and had them all thrown into the Pit of Unspeakable Agony//

Missing a subject for this clause.

>Rushing back to her desk, she pulled out a quill and parchment, and started to write something down.//

That second comma is unnecessary, as it's just a simple compound structure. But here's another danger of participles: They imply concurrent action. She wouldn't pull out the quill and parchment and start to write until after she'd rushed over to the desk, but you have her doing them at the same time.

>million year//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>billion year//

Same.

>With more than a bit of trepidation, though it was tinged with a bit of guilty excitement//

The telliness has been doubled!

>an audible pop//

That would be true by definition, wouldn't it?

>Looking down at the plate, she saw what was left of the cake sitting there, untouched, unsullied.//

Three of the last four sentences have a participle. Well, one of them is an absolute phrase, but it still uses a participle construction. Watch the repetition.

>to fit anymore inside//

In this case, you need "any more" as two words. An adverb doesn't fit the syntax here.

>To which, of course, the mare knew the answer to.//

The final "to" is doubling the function of the opening "to which."

>“ Princess//

Extraneous space.

>then looked back to the mare, her eyes wide with terror//

This absolute phrase is misplaced to the point of being ambiguous. Whose eyes are wide? The grammar would say the mare, but I suspect you meant Celestia.

>though there was still icing streaked across her face, and crumbs stuck in her fur//

There's no reason for that comma.

>prin–//

You've been using proper dashes, so why stop now?

>could, Celestia//

Extraneous space.

>then a look of confusion came over her//

And what does this look like?

>all confectionary goods are now considered a national treasure and we will take the proper safeguards//

Here's a spot where you actually need a comma to seaparate clauses.

>grimace, she//

Extraneous space. You should probably ctrl-f for two spaces.

>Spike watched her leave, still somewhat in shock. It was only after she’d left the library completely that her request hit him. He looked around at all the books that littered the floor, the last remnants of a decaying book castle. “Oh man…”//

So why are you shifting to his perspective for the grand total of one short paragraph?

>Twilight shuffled her hooves, hiding the book behind her back.//

Wouldn't this require her to be standing on two legs? Otherwise there isn't a "nehind her back."

>She took a deep breath, and pulled the book out//

Another unnecessary comma.

>mid sentence//

Needs a hyphen.

>“—stand…” finished Twilight//

The ellipsis and the choice of "finished" are fairly incongruous.

>he turned around to see a book lying in the grass//

If she's been so thorough as to destroy every known copy of the book, is she really going to be so reckless as to throw it out the window? I mean, what did she think would happen? She could have easily set it ablaze right there. And by not having her even entertain Twilight's questions, you really haven't brought closure to this story arc. It just… ends. There's no conflict, and none is really hinted at. Unless there's the possibility of them getting into an argument about it, that is. More so, there was a potential for character growth here. A minor amount on Twilight's part as she re-evaluates her perception of Celestia, but more on Celestia's part as she tries to explain herself and maybe expresses regret or defiant pride for her prior actions. It's a cute enough set of scenes, but it's essentially a very similar joke three times without any payoff. What with the outlandish tales and inexplicable city of books, I expected this would be some character assassination on Discord's part. But in the end, what did it matter that this story happened? What's different afterward than before? Twilight probably is vaguely leery of Celestia, but that's about it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twi//</span><br />When has Spike ever called her this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;first century//</span><br />Needs a hyphen as a compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;probably to go find his spelunking gear//</span><br />You haven&#039;t established a perspective until now, so you&#039;d apparently chosen an omniscient narrator, but this dips into Twilight&#039;s head. Might want to make your perspective more consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quickly overtaken by a minor book avalanche//</span><br />How would this not get Spike&#039;s attention? He hasn&#039;t been gone long, so he couldn&#039;t be far away.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pushing stray books to side//</span><br />Missing a word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;heavily-faded//</span><br />Conversely, you don&#039;t need a hyphen in a two-word phrase with an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Insane Edicts: A Legal History of Equestria//</span><br />Book titles are underlined or (preferably) italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight opened the book and read the inside of the cover where a short synopsis was written.//</span><br />Missing a comma for the dependent clause. This happens in the synopsis as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;known as one of the most respectable societies in the known//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to chronicles//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with detached disinterest//</span><br />The spot where we first meet this character is not the time to get telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;20//</span><br />Write out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At least Luna had provided some entertainment.//</span><br />We don&#039;t get to see any of it? Just this oblique reference? That&#039;s pretty unsatisfying.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Weather Pegasi Union//</span><br />Noun adjuncts are singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a rather boorish pegasus stallion//</span><br />Given that he&#039;s speaking for a pegasus union, it&#039;s redundant to tell me he&#039;s a pegasus.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;started banging her hoof on the desk//</span><br />I&#039;ve never seen much point in these &quot;start&quot; and &quot;begin&quot; actions that authors like to use so much. It&#039;s obvious that any given action will start. It&#039;s only worth mentioning if the beginning is noteworthy, as in an abrupt change or the action never finishes for some reason. Here, if you&#039;d just said, &quot;banged her hoof on the desk,&quot; what difference would it make?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All the gathered senators looked up to see an angry Celestia, her mane like roiling water as it tumbled about.//</span><br />You started the scene in Celestia&#039;s perspective, so why are you backing out into a collective point of view of the assembly? And for only a single sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Worthington…shire…fields…ville//</span><br />Boo for <i>Mr. Deeds</i> reference.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brows, but//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half-eaten by the looks of it//</span><br />And again, from some unspecified perspective outside Celestia. I don&#039;t see a reason for this. If you don&#039;t want her holding the perspective, then pick a specific character to hold it, or keep things omniscient. Or if you have to change perspective, don&#039;t jump around frequently or abruptly. The rationale is given at the top of this thread in the section on head hopping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sounded like she was chewing on asphalt//</span><br />I have no idea what that would sound like. Other than clicking against her teeth, I suppose, but asphalt is just a hard substance. It wouldn&#039;t sound any different than any other hard object, so I don&#039;t know why you picked it. It doesn&#039;t serve a thematic purpose, and it wouldn&#039;t have any importance to her or the narrator, so I&#039;m not sure what it achieves.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which were far more interesting anyway, he assured himself//</span><br />And now into his perspective. You do get some leeway in comedy for doing so, but this is happening an awful lot, and the time you spent in a muddle of collective crowd minds was odd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;only lasting about a month or so until Celestia finally got tired of the whole thing the government collapsed//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eventually being rebuilt a week later just as it had been before//</span><br />Clunky to tack two participles together like you have here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;read Twilight as she flipped to the last page in the chapter//</span><br />So was the preceding scene a flashback, or was it actually written in the book that way? Because I can&#039;t see a historical account including dialogue and switching perspective like that, but it comes across that way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the name of the author of the book//</span><br />A prime example of why these indirect possessions are so clunky. There are times when it&#039;s worth flipping them to create emphasis, but there&#039;s no reason here. &quot;The author&#039;s name&quot; is so much more direct and concise, and what does it lose?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;titled,//</span><br />This isn&#039;t dialogue. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;setting aside the paperwork for the orphanage she was filling out//</span><br />The ordering of your phrases inibits clarity here. It sounds like she&#039;s filling out an orphanage, whis is rather… grim.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He looked nervous//</span><br />This telly language is hardly necessary, since you go on to describe him as looking nervous well enough anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nervous, Celestia could tell, from the way his eyes shifted about, and he shuffled his hooves nervously//</span><br />So, he&#039;s nervous, you say?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your highness//</span><br />Capitalize the honorific.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princess//</span><br />As a term of address, this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Staring out at the regal city of Canterlot, the breeze flowed through her mane.</span><br />A classic dangling participle. &quot;Staring out at the regal city of Canterlot&quot; describes Celestia, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the sentence. This explicitly says that the breeze stared at the city.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Moon gazing, I’ll make it illegal.”//</span><br />This gives her a rather antagonistic approach to her own sister which is completely unsupported by canon, and in fact directly contradicts it. Not that you can&#039;t go there, but you have to connect the dots to explain why she&#039;d reasonably feel this way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;captain//</span><br />Ranks and titles would also be capitalized as terms of direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which made him visibly uncomfortable//</span><br />How so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and had them all thrown into the Pit of Unspeakable Agony//</span><br />Missing a subject for this clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rushing back to her desk, she pulled out a quill and parchment, and started to write something down.//</span><br />That second comma is unnecessary, as it&#039;s just a simple compound structure. But here&#039;s another danger of participles: They imply concurrent action. She wouldn&#039;t pull out the quill and parchment and start to write until after she&#039;d rushed over to the desk, but you have her doing them at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;million year//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;billion year//</span><br />Same.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With more than a bit of trepidation, though it was tinged with a bit of guilty excitement//</span><br />The telliness has been doubled!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an audible pop//</span><br />That would be true by definition, wouldn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Looking down at the plate, she saw what was left of the cake sitting there, untouched, unsullied.//</span><br />Three of the last four sentences have a participle. Well, one of them is an absolute phrase, but it still uses a participle construction. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to fit anymore inside//</span><br />In this case, you need &quot;any more&quot; as two words. An adverb doesn&#039;t fit the syntax here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To which, of course, the mare knew the answer to.//</span><br />The final &quot;to&quot; is doubling the function of the opening &quot;to which.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“ Princess//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then looked back to the mare, her eyes wide with terror//</span><br />This absolute phrase is misplaced to the point of being ambiguous. Whose eyes are wide? The grammar would say the mare, but I suspect you meant Celestia.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;though there was still icing streaked across her face, and crumbs stuck in her fur//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason for that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;prin–//</span><br />You&#039;ve been using proper dashes, so why stop now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;could, Celestia//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then a look of confusion came over her//</span><br />And what does this look like?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all confectionary goods are now considered a national treasure and we will take the proper safeguards//</span><br />Here&#039;s a spot where you actually need a comma to seaparate clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;grimace, she//</span><br />Extraneous space. You should probably ctrl-f for two spaces.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike watched her leave, still somewhat in shock. It was only after she’d left the library completely that her request hit him. He looked around at all the books that littered the floor, the last remnants of a decaying book castle. “Oh man…”//</span><br />So why are you shifting to his perspective for the grand total of one short paragraph?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight shuffled her hooves, hiding the book behind her back.//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t this require her to be standing on two legs? Otherwise there isn&#039;t a &quot;nehind her back.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She took a deep breath, and pulled the book out//</span><br />Another unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mid sentence//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“—stand…” finished Twilight//</span><br />The ellipsis and the choice of &quot;finished&quot; are fairly incongruous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he turned around to see a book lying in the grass//</span><br />If she&#039;s been so thorough as to destroy every known copy of the book, is she really going to be so reckless as to throw it out the window? I mean, what did she think would happen? She could have easily set it ablaze right there. And by not having her even entertain Twilight&#039;s questions, you really haven&#039;t brought closure to this story arc. It just… ends. There&#039;s no conflict, and none is really hinted at. Unless there&#039;s the possibility of them getting into an argument about it, that is. More so, there was a potential for character growth here. A minor amount on Twilight&#039;s part as she re-evaluates her perception of Celestia, but more on Celestia&#039;s part as she tries to explain herself and maybe expresses regret or defiant pride for her prior actions. It&#039;s a cute enough set of scenes, but it&#039;s essentially a very similar joke three times without any payoff. What with the outlandish tales and inexplicable city of books, I expected this would be some character assassination on Discord&#039;s part. But in the end, what did it matter that this story happened? What&#039;s different afterward than before? Twilight probably is vaguely leery of Celestia, but that&#039;s about it.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Jun 28th, 2014 15:40</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 232

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A magical light gathered all of the scraps into a pile.//

This is a little confusing, given that you just spoke about a candle.

>Something caught his attention//

A lot of things have been catching his attention. This is starting to get repetitive.

I'll say here at the end of the first scene that I've never been a fan of exposition through having a character talk out loud to himself. A limited narrator could say all these things for him. It's kind of a cliche to have characters talk to them selves as a proxy for talking to the reader.

>Celestia rose from her spot and stepped over to Star Swirl, levitating the book with her.//

I'll spare you my usual lecture about misplaced modifiers, but suffice it to say it's problematic to have the "levitating" phrase come immediately after the name of a character it doesn't describe, because then it will seem to.

>“What it is?”//

Word order.

>The two princesses galloped down the corridors//

Why not teleport? I get that it's for plot convenience so you can have them talk, but in terms of making sense, that would be the most expedient way of getting there.

>Liar!//

When a ? or ! is on an italicized word, in most circumstances, italicize it as well.

>In a moment//

You sure you didn't mean something like "in an instant"? This implies some time elapsing, but that's at odds with the sudden cutoff.

>Die!//

Same deal with the italics. Just do a sweep for these.

>you can fight it! You can’t defeat it!//

Maybe I misunderstood what she's saying, but she seems to be giving mixed messages here.

>Her own magic wavered for a moment, but held him in place.//

No need for that comma. It's all one clause, and it's not particularly complex.

>eye-level//

No need for the hyphen.

>“For the time being, though—” Her head lowered to the rock floor. “—there is nothing to be done. I am exhausted.”//

An aside in a quote doesn't need to be capitalized (unless it's a word that has to be anyway), and it doesn't need a period (other end punctuation is fine).

>Cadance looked between the other princesses, frowning.//

Ambiguous as to who's frowning.

>Cadance hung her head//

The exact action Celestia just did.

>Craning her head, the sun stared back at her from the horizon, awaiting her command.//

Yipe. A genuine dangling participle. "Craning her head" describes Celestia, but she doesn't appear in the clause. This explicitly says that the sun craned her head.

>In a flash, Celestia vanished.//

Ah, so now she can teleport.

>“That’s, like, why we came here in the first place!”//

This whole conversation is off-putting. It's not until Luna's mentioned that I could even figure out what was happening, and this gets very talking heads (there's a discussion of that at the top of this thread).

>‘Tis//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Past one in from somewhere else, or add one after it and delete the first one.

>she writhed onto the floor//

"Onto" implies a destination, whereas "on" implies a location. One does not normally writhe from one place to another.

>We had no magic—no way to defend ourselves—so we failed to notice them.//

And so what even attracted them to the princesses? There was nothing there for them, nor was there any appreciable hope for there ever to be.

>Meet me in the Empire as soon as you can.//

I'm a little iffy as to the wisdom in this. It is likely that Cadence has one, but there's no reason to think they'd only attack the princesses. They preferred Starswirl in the past, even though the princesses were available. Inasmuch as all races are described as having magic, wouldn't anyone be a possible victim?

>“So do we get, like, a raincheck or something?”//

Is this really the best place for a joke?

>He stopped pacing//

You don't need this repetitive use of "pace."

>And, Shining Armor?//

No reason to have a comma there. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>She aim a white stream of magic at Cadance’s horn//

Verb form.

>Shining lit his own horn and said, “I’m sorry, Princess Celestia, but… I couldn’t stand to watch that anymore. You were going to kill her.”//

Here's a symptom of a problem I'm seeing off and on. Imagine how emotionally torn he must be here. But read this summary of it and see how little of his emotional state I can get from it. He seems awfully stoic about all this, and at times, all the characters do.

>He pulled her into an embrace, whispering something in her ear.//

Had you chosen a limited narrator, this would work, but an omniscient narrator would know what he said. You could phrase it that the other couldn't hear what he said, since that's true.

>‘Tis//

Backward apostrophe again.

The one thing that makes me uneasy about the ending is that Cadence gets over it immediately. There's the brief moment where she tries to use her magic, but aside from that, it's like she barely cares. It'd take her longer than that to get over losing something that's been a part of her all of her life. For that matter, canon shows that they can transfer their magic to each other. What's keeping the other princess from each donating a share of their magic to her? There are certainly explanations. Perhaps Celestia and Luna couldn't manage the sun and moon after giving any up, and it certainly wouldn't bring back Cadence's talent, since they don't have that to give her. But they could at least get her functional with the basics again, what with levitation and such. They could even draw some from unicorns to get that. I'm surprised Twilight doesn't make any suggestions along these lines, since she's experienced it. Or Celestia, for that matter, since she came up with the idea in the first place.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A magical light gathered all of the scraps into a pile.//</span><br />This is a little confusing, given that you just spoke about a candle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Something caught his attention//</span><br />A lot of things have been catching his attention. This is starting to get repetitive.<br /><br />I&#039;ll say here at the end of the first scene that I&#039;ve never been a fan of exposition through having a character talk out loud to himself. A limited narrator could say all these things for him. It&#039;s kind of a cliche to have characters talk to them selves as a proxy for talking to the reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia rose from her spot and stepped over to Star Swirl, levitating the book with her.//</span><br />I&#039;ll spare you my usual lecture about misplaced modifiers, but suffice it to say it&#039;s problematic to have the &quot;levitating&quot; phrase come immediately after the name of a character it doesn&#039;t describe, because then it will seem to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“What it is?”//</span><br />Word order.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two princesses galloped down the corridors//</span><br />Why not teleport? I get that it&#039;s for plot convenience so you can have them talk, but in terms of making sense, that would be the most expedient way of getting there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Liar</i>!//</span><br />When a ? or ! is on an italicized word, in most circumstances, italicize it as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In a moment//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean something like &quot;in an instant&quot;? This implies some time elapsing, but that&#039;s at odds with the sudden cutoff.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Die</i>!//</span><br />Same deal with the italics. Just do a sweep for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you can fight it! You can’t defeat it!//</span><br />Maybe I misunderstood what she&#039;s saying, but she seems to be giving mixed messages here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her own magic wavered for a moment, but held him in place.//</span><br />No need for that comma. It&#039;s all one clause, and it&#039;s not particularly complex.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eye-level//</span><br />No need for the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“For the time being, though—” Her head lowered to the rock floor. “—there is nothing to be done. I am exhausted.”//</span><br />An aside in a quote doesn&#039;t need to be capitalized (unless it&#039;s a word that has to be anyway), and it doesn&#039;t need a period (other end punctuation is fine).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadance looked between the other princesses, frowning.//</span><br />Ambiguous as to who&#039;s frowning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cadance hung her head//</span><br />The exact action Celestia just did.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Craning her head, the sun stared back at her from the horizon, awaiting her command.//</span><br />Yipe. A genuine dangling participle. &quot;Craning her head&quot; describes Celestia, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the clause. This explicitly says that the sun craned her head.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In a flash, Celestia vanished.//</span><br />Ah, so <i>now</i> she can teleport.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That’s, like, why we came here in the first place!”//</span><br />This whole conversation is off-putting. It&#039;s not until Luna&#039;s mentioned that I could even figure out what was happening, and this gets very talking heads (there&#039;s a discussion of that at the top of this thread).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Tis//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Past one in from somewhere else, or add one after it and delete the first one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she writhed onto the floor//</span><br />&quot;Onto&quot; implies a destination, whereas &quot;on&quot; implies a location. One does not normally writhe from one place to another.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We had no magic—no way to defend ourselves—so we failed to notice them.//</span><br />And so what even attracted them to the princesses? There was nothing there for them, nor was there any appreciable hope for there ever to be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Meet me in the Empire as soon as you can.//</span><br />I&#039;m a little iffy as to the wisdom in this. It is likely that Cadence has one, but there&#039;s no reason to think they&#039;d only attack the princesses. They preferred Starswirl in the past, even though the princesses were available. Inasmuch as all races are described as having magic, wouldn&#039;t anyone be a possible victim?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“So do we get, like, a raincheck or something?”//</span><br />Is this really the best place for a joke?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He stopped pacing//</span><br />You don&#039;t need this repetitive use of &quot;pace.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And, Shining Armor?//</span><br />No reason to have a comma there. They&#039;re not for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She aim a white stream of magic at Cadance’s horn//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shining lit his own horn and said, “I’m sorry, Princess Celestia, but… I couldn’t stand to watch that anymore. You were going to kill her.”//</span><br />Here&#039;s a symptom of a problem I&#039;m seeing off and on. Imagine how emotionally torn he must be here. But read this summary of it and see how little of his emotional state I can get from it. He seems awfully stoic about all this, and at times, all the characters do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He pulled her into an embrace, whispering something in her ear.//</span><br />Had you chosen a limited narrator, this would work, but an omniscient narrator would know what he said. You could phrase it that the other couldn&#039;t hear what he said, since that&#039;s true.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Tis//</span><br />Backward apostrophe again.<br /><br />The one thing that makes me uneasy about the ending is that Cadence gets over it immediately. There&#039;s the brief moment where she tries to use her magic, but aside from that, it&#039;s like she barely cares. It&#039;d take her longer than that to get over losing something that&#039;s been a part of her all of her life. For that matter, canon shows that they can transfer their magic to each other. What&#039;s keeping the other princess from each donating a share of their magic to her? There are certainly explanations. Perhaps Celestia and Luna couldn&#039;t manage the sun and moon after giving any up, and it certainly wouldn&#039;t bring back Cadence&#039;s talent, since they don&#039;t have that to give her. But they could at least get her functional with the basics again, what with levitation and such. They could even draw some from unicorns to get that. I&#039;m surprised Twilight doesn&#039;t make any suggestions along these lines, since she&#039;s experienced it. Or Celestia, for that matter, since she came up with the idea in the first place.<br />

BachiavellianCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 233

Didn't know how else to get in touch with you, so I guess I'll leave this here.

Just wanted to say that I am so grateful for your work. You have my thanks and admiration for dealing with novices like me with politeness and excellence. Every time I get feedback from you, it makes me feel like my manuscript is nothing but awkward attempts at fumbling around with words but in the best possible way.

I look at my writing as a way I've been trying to improve myself as a person, so your input and direction mean a big deal to me. I've got a lot to learn, and I'm glad for your help.

Take care!Didn&#039;t know how else to get in touch with you, so I guess I&#039;ll leave this here.<br /><br />Just wanted to say that I am so grateful for your work. You have my thanks and admiration for dealing with novices like me with politeness and excellence. Every time I get feedback from you, it makes me feel like my manuscript is nothing but awkward attempts at fumbling around with words but in the best possible way.<br /><br />I look at my writing as a way I&#039;ve been trying to improve myself as a person, so your input and direction mean a big deal to me. I&#039;ve got a lot to learn, and I&#039;m glad for your help.<br /><br />Take care!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 234

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>razing her head//

I really hope you meant "raising," or this has already taken a decidedly grim turn.

>YOU//

It's preferred to indicate emphasis through italics.

>A pale yellow pegasus flapped over beside Amethyst, giving her a glare.//

You've used an awful lot of participial phrases so far. It's lending the narration a repetitive feel. There are seven in just the first screenful. Another reason to watch them is that there are three or four problems that come with misusing them, and the more you have, the more likely these problems will crop up.

>She reached to the device hanging around her neck and lifted them to her eyes.//

Number mismatch: device-> them.

>The binoculars produced clicked as Amethyst’s vision zoomed, narrowing down to look through the window of the dingy bar.//

Fairly repetitive with how the first paragraph ended.

>Ember tossed her mane back, and blinked her long eyelashes at him before reaching Amethyst.//

You don't need this comma. It's just separating a compound structure, not clauses. There's an explanation at the top of this thread in the section on comma use with conjunctions. This issue came up every so often.

>Celestia given//

Hyphenate compound modifiers.

>… your face’s right to remain silent…//

Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis. And capitalize this, since it's not picking up on a sentence she previously left hanging.

>‘Cause//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Add a second one, then delete the first, or else just paste one in.

>Ember’s words were cut off//

You don't need to narrate this, as it's already apparent from the punctuation. Furthermore, the action that cuts it off needs to come right after the speech. If the narrator has time to wedge anything else in, it undercuts the immediacy of the interruption.

>messed up//

Another compound descriptor that needs a hyphen.

>Amethyst mumbled, clicking the binoculars a few more times.//

You let off for a while, but it's back with a vengeance. Third sentence in a row with a participle. When you use these more unusual structures consecutively, it gives the prose a list-like feel.

>Mr. Cake gave her a confused look//

I'd rather have a description that helps me picture it in my head rather than having your narrator conclude for me how it looks. I haven't seen any bad spots of telling so far, but it might do you well to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread in case it does come up, or just for future reference.

>the bag was full of-//

Please use a proper dash.

>Amethyst took the binoculars back, tucking it into her trench coat as she smacked Ember on the back of her head.//

And this is the seventh straight sentence of narration that contains a participle.

>case.” Amethyst said//

Dialogue punctuation. There's a section on this up top as well. You seem to get it wrong when the dialogue would end with a period, but takes a comma to transition into an attribution with a speaking verb.

>She then stood up, dusting herself off.//

Here's one of the aforementioned problems that participles can cause. They imply concurrent action, but she wouldn't dust herself off until after she stood.

>Perfect.//

This is a limited narrator in a pretty deep perspective. Contrast it with this:
>Amethyst looked at the other mare, totally unamused.//
The "totally unamused" part is a rather external judgment that would be odd for her to make about herself. She'd focus more on her stream of thought or the physical symptoms of her emotions. It's probably worth trying to tighten this up to achieve a consistent perspective. I do appreciate that all of the limited narration so far has been confined to Amethyst's point of view.

>She lowered her binoculars crept toward the back door.//

Missing word.

>She smirked again… and waited.//

Four sentences in a row begin with "she."

>pocket- covered//

Please use a proper dash.

>cokcing//

Typo.

>she felt afraid//

You've transitioned into Ember's perspective now and actually doe it smoothly, which is no mean feat. But like I noted once before, this feels like an awfully external observation when you can give her rawer thoughts from the limited narrator.

>an almost cartoonish trail of smoke//

This is rather meta and going for a more random brand of humor than the story has been using so far. Basically, it feels out of place.

>“Doesn’t matter, got what I wanted.” she grinned.//

Given the comment I made earlier about dialogue punctuation, I assume you intended for "she grinned" to be a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb. You can capitalize it to make it a separate sentence.

>A look of horror//

Pretty telly and somewhat repetitive with the earlier "looking a bit nervous."

>Oh don’t play coy with me Mr. Cake//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>‘suspicious!’ “//

Extraneous space has broken the smart quotes and made them backward.

>You’ve got it all wrong Ms. Breeze!//

Direct address again.

>Wow Ammy,//

And in the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

>‘The Art of War,’//

Book titles are underlined or (preferably) italicized. You don't need the comma before this, either.

>now drooling//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>Alright Ember//

Direct address again.

>The pegasus//

You're referring to her as such a lot lately. Don't overdo it.

>Amethyst spoke up//

You're using this a lot lately, too. It's not really a valid speaking verb, as it's intransitive, though I'm only guessing that you intended to use it as one, given the punctuation.

>Suddenly, the door to the interrogation room burst open as Mrs. Cake galloped in, embracing Mr. Cake in a massive hug.//

Here's another spot where participles muddle the chronology. "As" clauses also imply simultaneous action, so the door bursting open, Mrs. Cake galloping in, and her embrace all happen at the same instant instead of in sequence.

>I’m sorry for being so secretive honey bun!//

Direct address and inconsistent with your earlier use of "honeybun" as a single word.

>Ember looked like she was about to vomit as she looked at the two slobbery ponies across the room. She stayed silent for a moment, but she mustered up the strength to ask something.//

Look at the inconsistent perspectives here. At first, it's external. She would look like she was about to vomit to someone else, not herself. But then only she would know she'd "mustered up the strength to ask," so that part's in her head.

>cloud clearing//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>that wasn’t the complete truth, Amethyst had done the calculations last night//

This comma is a splice.

>morning Ammy//

Direct address again.

>which usually meant Amethyst was neck deep in filing paperwork//

Why have you gone to Ember's perspective here? The scene didn't start that way, since she wasn't even present.

>Actually…” Ember’s gaze wandered around the office, noticing papers strewn everywhere, which usually meant Amethyst was neck deep in filing paperwork. “…did//

It looks like you're trying to do a narrative aside in a quote. Here's how to do it:
>Actually—” Ember’s gaze wandered around the office, noticing papers strewn everywhere, which usually meant Amethyst was neck deep in filing paperwork “—did//
Or you can put the dashes outside the quotes if the speaker doesn't actually stop. It's odd to personify her gaze here, though, having it and not her notice the papers.

A word here about your ellipsis usage. In some places, it's a single character, and in others, it's three separate dots. Do a search and replace to make them consistent. It doesn't matter which one you use. But except for leading ellipses, at least put a space after them. The three common formats are… this, or … this, or . . . this.

>Yeah Ammy?//

Direct address.

>What I NEED, is money.//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses. You do that a lot in this paragraph.

>she was up in Ember’s face now, very close to pressing their faces together//

This is not a dialogue attribution. You an't just tack on any action with a comma and call it a speech tag. It has to use a speaking verb.

>her mane and horn continuing to spark with electricity//

At least you acknowledge the repetition, but using the same mundane phrasing is just boring.

>Ember looked like she might cry//

At least you'd stayed with Ember's perspective once you went there, but this isn't a judgment she'd make about herself, so i can't tell whose opinion this is. Amethyst's? The client's?

>Then, quick as a flash Amethyst shot over to her desk, bearing a smile.//

Another danger of participles: they like to modify the nearest prior noun or pronoun, unless they start a clause, in which case they like to modify its subject. By proximity, it sounds like the desk is bearing a smile. We can certainly apply a bit of logic to sort things out, but there's actually a possible explanation for how the desk could, so it's a bit ambiguous. The larger point is that if you don't keep this in mind, you will eventually use one in an ambiguous or misleading way.

>waving it off with a hoof//

What does "it" refer to here?

>flowershop//

Two words.

>walked by before, but haven’t had a chance to stop by//

Fairly repetitive phrasings using "by."

>handed it to Ember//

With her… hand?

>how is that even a crime?//

Oh, I dunno. Trespassing? Criminal mischief? Breaking and entering?

>an alternate revenue streams//

Number mismatch.

>That’s Fancy for, ‘We’re broke,’ right?//

You don't need that first comma. It isn't a quote.

>spoke//

You like to use this a lot, but it makes for a very clunky attribution verb.

>Amethyst’s voice trailed off//

Like my earlier point about cutoffs, you don't need to narrate trailing off when it's already apparent from the punctuation.

>despite their upside down position//

Upside-down.

>complementing//

While this has a possible valid meaning (whereby she suggests abetting the criminal), I believe you meant "complimenting."

>She winked, but the caught Amethyst’s eye.//

Some wording got jumbled there.

>It glows a different color depending on the cutie mark of the pony that made the print!//

How would this be very useful? Hooves are essentially toenails. They don't have distinctive patterns, unless you count possible nicks and scratches, but those could be altered at will. And many cutie marks are the same color. It wouldn't be anywhere close to a definitive match.

>Amethysts shook her head.//

Typo.

>right-side up//

Inconsistent with your earlier spelling of "rightside-up."

>a pegasi//

Number mismatch.

>Amethyst screamed pounding her head against a wall.//

Participles are normally set off with a comma.

>As if to emphasize this//

You do this (heh) a few times. It's ungainly to use demonstratives (this, that, these, those) by themselves in narration, as they have vague antecedents that are often large self-referential chunks of the narration itself. Better to rephrase or stick an appropriate noun after it to make it a modifier.

This is a fun story so far. These are likable characters who have an interesting dynamic between them, honestly, just square away these technical problems, and I'll send it up for posting. For some, I pointed out every instance I saw, but for others (namely, dialogue punctuation, participle overuse, comma usage with conjunctions, perspective, and telly language), I left it to you to root it out after I listed examples.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;razing her head//</span><br />I really hope you meant &quot;raising,&quot; or this has already taken a decidedly grim turn.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;YOU//</span><br />It&#039;s preferred to indicate emphasis through italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A pale yellow pegasus flapped over beside Amethyst, giving her a glare.//</span><br />You&#039;ve used an awful lot of participial phrases so far. It&#039;s lending the narration a repetitive feel. There are seven in just the first screenful. Another reason to watch them is that there are three or four problems that come with misusing them, and the more you have, the more likely these problems will crop up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She reached to the device hanging around her neck and lifted them to her eyes.//</span><br />Number mismatch: device-&gt; them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The binoculars produced clicked as Amethyst’s vision zoomed, narrowing down to look through the window of the dingy bar.//</span><br />Fairly repetitive with how the first paragraph ended.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ember tossed her mane back, and blinked her long eyelashes at him before reaching Amethyst.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need this comma. It&#039;s just separating a compound structure, not clauses. There&#039;s an explanation at the top of this thread in the section on comma use with conjunctions. This issue came up every so often.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia given//</span><br />Hyphenate compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;… your face’s right to remain silent…//</span><br />Don&#039;t put a space after a leading ellipsis. And capitalize this, since it&#039;s not picking up on a sentence she previously left hanging.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Cause//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Add a second one, then delete the first, or else just paste one in.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ember’s words were cut off//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to narrate this, as it&#039;s already apparent from the punctuation. Furthermore, the action that cuts it off needs to come right after the speech. If the narrator has time to wedge anything else in, it undercuts the immediacy of the interruption.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;messed up//</span><br />Another compound descriptor that needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst mumbled, clicking the binoculars a few more times.//</span><br />You let off for a while, but it&#039;s back with a vengeance. Third sentence in a row with a participle. When you use these more unusual structures consecutively, it gives the prose a list-like feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mr. Cake gave her a confused look//</span><br />I&#039;d rather have a description that helps me picture it in my head rather than having your narrator conclude for me how it looks. I haven&#039;t seen any bad spots of telling so far, but it might do you well to read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread in case it does come up, or just for future reference.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the bag was full of-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst took the binoculars back, tucking it into her trench coat as she smacked Ember on the back of her head.//</span><br />And this is the seventh straight sentence of narration that contains a participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;case.” Amethyst said//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation. There&#039;s a section on this up top as well. You seem to get it wrong when the dialogue would end with a period, but takes a comma to transition into an attribution with a speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She then stood up, dusting herself off.//</span><br />Here&#039;s one of the aforementioned problems that participles can cause. They imply concurrent action, but she wouldn&#039;t dust herself off until after she stood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Perfect.//</span><br />This is a limited narrator in a pretty deep perspective. Contrast it with this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst looked at the other mare, totally unamused.//</span><br />The &quot;totally unamused&quot; part is a rather external judgment that would be odd for her to make about herself. She&#039;d focus more on her stream of thought or the physical symptoms of her emotions. It&#039;s probably worth trying to tighten this up to achieve a consistent perspective. I do appreciate that all of the limited narration so far has been confined to Amethyst&#039;s point of view.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She lowered her binoculars crept toward the back door.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smirked again… and waited.//</span><br />Four sentences in a row begin with &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pocket- covered//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cokcing//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she felt afraid//</span><br />You&#039;ve transitioned into Ember&#039;s perspective now and actually doe it smoothly, which is no mean feat. But like I noted once before, this feels like an awfully external observation when you can give her rawer thoughts from the limited narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an almost cartoonish trail of smoke//</span><br />This is rather meta and going for a more random brand of humor than the story has been using so far. Basically, it feels out of place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Doesn’t matter, got what I wanted.” she grinned.//</span><br />Given the comment I made earlier about dialogue punctuation, I assume you intended for &quot;she grinned&quot; to be a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb. You can capitalize it to make it a separate sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A look of horror//</span><br />Pretty telly and somewhat repetitive with the earlier &quot;looking a bit nervous.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh don’t play coy with me Mr. Cake//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘suspicious!’ “//</span><br />Extraneous space has broken the smart quotes and made them backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You’ve got it all wrong Ms. Breeze!//</span><br />Direct address again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wow Ammy,//</span><br />And in the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘The Art of War,’//</span><br />Book titles are underlined or (preferably) italicized. You don&#039;t need the comma before this, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now drooling//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Alright Ember//</span><br />Direct address again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pegasus//</span><br />You&#039;re referring to her as such a lot lately. Don&#039;t overdo it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst spoke up//</span><br />You&#039;re using this a lot lately, too. It&#039;s not really a valid speaking verb, as it&#039;s intransitive, though I&#039;m only guessing that you intended to use it as one, given the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suddenly, the door to the interrogation room burst open as Mrs. Cake galloped in, embracing Mr. Cake in a massive hug.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another spot where participles muddle the chronology. &quot;As&quot; clauses also imply simultaneous action, so the door bursting open, Mrs. Cake galloping in, and her embrace all happen at the same instant instead of in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sorry for being so secretive honey bun!//</span><br />Direct address and inconsistent with your earlier use of &quot;honeybun&quot; as a single word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ember looked like she was about to vomit as she looked at the two slobbery ponies across the room. She stayed silent for a moment, but she mustered up the strength to ask something.//</span><br />Look at the inconsistent perspectives here. At first, it&#039;s external. She would look like she was about to vomit to someone else, not herself. But then only she would know she&#039;d &quot;mustered up the strength to ask,&quot; so that part&#039;s in her head.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cloud clearing//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that wasn’t the complete truth, Amethyst had done the calculations last night//</span><br />This comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;morning Ammy//</span><br />Direct address again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which usually meant Amethyst was neck deep in filing paperwork//</span><br />Why have you gone to Ember&#039;s perspective here? The scene didn&#039;t start that way, since she wasn&#039;t even present.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Actually…” Ember’s gaze wandered around the office, noticing papers strewn everywhere, which usually meant Amethyst was neck deep in filing paperwork. “…did//</span><br />It looks like you&#039;re trying to do a narrative aside in a quote. Here&#039;s how to do it:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Actually—” Ember’s gaze wandered around the office, noticing papers strewn everywhere, which usually meant Amethyst was neck deep in filing paperwork “—did//</span><br />Or you can put the dashes outside the quotes if the speaker doesn&#039;t actually stop. It&#039;s odd to personify her gaze here, though, having it and not her notice the papers.<br /><br />A word here about your ellipsis usage. In some places, it&#039;s a single character, and in others, it&#039;s three separate dots. Do a search and replace to make them consistent. It doesn&#039;t matter which one you use. But except for leading ellipses, at least put a space after them. The three common formats are… this, or … this, or . . . this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah Ammy?//</span><br />Direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What I NEED, is money.//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses. You do that a lot in this paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was up in Ember’s face now, very close to pressing their faces together//</span><br />This is not a dialogue attribution. You an&#039;t just tack on any action with a comma and call it a speech tag. It has to use a speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her mane and horn continuing to spark with electricity//</span><br />At least you acknowledge the repetition, but using the same mundane phrasing is just boring.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ember looked like she might cry//</span><br />At least you&#039;d stayed with Ember&#039;s perspective once you went there, but this isn&#039;t a judgment she&#039;d make about herself, so i can&#039;t tell whose opinion this is. Amethyst&#039;s? The client&#039;s?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then, quick as a flash Amethyst shot over to her desk, bearing a smile.//</span><br />Another danger of participles: they like to modify the nearest prior noun or pronoun, unless they start a clause, in which case they like to modify its subject. By proximity, it sounds like the desk is bearing a smile. We can certainly apply a bit of logic to sort things out, but there&#039;s actually a possible explanation for how the desk could, so it&#039;s a bit ambiguous. The larger point is that if you don&#039;t keep this in mind, you will eventually use one in an ambiguous or misleading way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waving it off with a hoof//</span><br />What does &quot;it&quot; refer to here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flowershop//</span><br />Two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;walked by before, but haven’t had a chance to stop by//</span><br />Fairly repetitive phrasings using &quot;by.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;handed it to Ember//</span><br />With her… hand?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;how is that even a crime?//</span><br />Oh, I dunno. Trespassing? Criminal mischief? Breaking and entering?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an alternate revenue streams//</span><br />Number mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That’s Fancy for, ‘We’re broke,’ right?//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that first comma. It isn&#039;t a quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spoke//</span><br />You like to use this a lot, but it makes for a very clunky attribution verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst’s voice trailed off//</span><br />Like my earlier point about cutoffs, you don&#039;t need to narrate trailing off when it&#039;s already apparent from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;despite their upside down position//</span><br />Upside-down.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;complementing//</span><br />While this has a possible valid meaning (whereby she suggests abetting the criminal), I believe you meant &quot;complimenting.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She winked, but the caught Amethyst’s eye.//</span><br />Some wording got jumbled there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It glows a different color depending on the cutie mark of the pony that made the print!//</span><br />How would this be very useful? Hooves are essentially toenails. They don&#039;t have distinctive patterns, unless you count possible nicks and scratches, but those could be altered at will. And many cutie marks are the same color. It wouldn&#039;t be anywhere close to a definitive match.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethysts shook her head.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;right-side up//</span><br />Inconsistent with your earlier spelling of &quot;rightside-up.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a pegasi//</span><br />Number mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst screamed pounding her head against a wall.//</span><br />Participles are normally set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As if to emphasize this//</span><br />You do this (heh) a few times. It&#039;s ungainly to use demonstratives (this, that, these, those) by themselves in narration, as they have vague antecedents that are often large self-referential chunks of the narration itself. Better to rephrase or stick an appropriate noun after it to make it a modifier.<br /><br />This is a fun story so far. These are likable characters who have an interesting dynamic between them, honestly, just square away these technical problems, and I&#039;ll send it up for posting. For some, I pointed out every instance I saw, but for others (namely, dialogue punctuation, participle overuse, comma usage with conjunctions, perspective, and telly language), I left it to you to root it out after I listed examples.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 235

>>130848

Thank you very much for such a detailed analysis. We'll get all these fixed and resubmit it once the issues you have mentioned are addressed!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130848" onclick="return highlight('130848', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130848">&gt;&gt;130848</a><br /><br />Thank you very much for such a detailed analysis. We&#039;ll get all these fixed and resubmit it once the issues you have mentioned are addressed!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 236

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>There was forgoing etiquette and the was forgoing self-respect.//

Typo

>-that-//

Hyphens aren't for emphasis.

>Slamming her door shut behind her, it only took a moment to realize exactly why the sound was so bad.//

Misplaced modifier. It doesn't sound like she's the one doing the slamming. Leading participles modify the subject, so you're describing "it" here.

>a grey pegasus blurted out as she landed in front of Octavia, scrambling to collect the scattered parcels.//

Here, I'll say that I notice you use a whole lot of participles. Besides creating a repetitive structure, they have their own attendant problems. You have a lot that are misplaced modifiers. I haven't said anything until now because it's clear what you mean in most of them, but this one's truly ambiguous. Who's "scrambling"? By the rules of grammar, Octavia is, but I bet you meant Derpy. If there was an inanimate object there in the sentence where Octavia is, then I could apply a bit of logic and sort it out, but if you don't keep modifier placement in mind, you will slip into ambiguous and misleading phrasings at times.

>With that decision made, and her hind legs rested, she resumed playing.//

She was going to take a break, then found the rock and thought about it a bit. That took long enough that she's rested now?

>Meanwhile, much further down the catwalk//

You'd kept the story in a very subjective narration so far, so why break it here? And only for a single paragraph? What does it achieve to have the reader see this now? Better to find out about it the same way a character does later on, since you'll have to do that eventually. There's not even any tension built here, as we have no reason to know or care what's in the box or who Sunset Shimmer is. This could go in the next scene, except that it's easy enough to deduce. I'd recommend cutting it altogether.

So if Vinyl is so well-known, why does she live in an apartment no better than Octavia, who lives on donations day to day? And why would Octavia take her instrument there? She was expecting something pretty seedy, and really, what she gets isn't any better from the perspective of keeping her cello from getting damaged. She's not exactly on a schedule, either, so why not swing by her apartment to drop it off? It's nearby.

>Octavia's embarrassment was plain on her face.//

Don't I get to see it, too? This is another thing I saw intermittently. It's more effective to get me to deduce a character's emotion than to tell me bluntly.

>“‘scuse me, Octavia.//

Capitalization.

>pegasi guards//

Noun adjuncts are singular.

>full blown//

You have a few spots where you don't hyphenate a compound modifier.

>She saw Vinyl flip through the air as the magical blast slammed into her, cringing as the unicorn landed with all the grace of a rag doll.//

Another example of an ambiguous participle.

>Octavia grit her teeth.//

gritted

Indicate direct thoughts with quotes and an appropriate tag or italics.

Hyphens constantly used where dashes are needed, and even then, you use them in some places where commas would be more appropriate.

Spell out numbers.

You also use a ton of "to be" verbs. They are inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 263. That's a little more than one every other sentence on average. That's how often something isn't happening in this story. You need to be choosing more active verbs.

We're kind of thrown into this world without much of a picture of how things got this way. The caste system going on here is like that before Hearth's Warming, but you still reference the princesses, so did that never happen, or has society lapsed back into it somehow? And even in that case, the earth ponies' talent was in producing the food, while you have that happening on the upper tiers where the unicorns live, then what function do they serve in society?

It's possible you address these things in later chapters, and it's actually a good thing to dole out exposition a little at a time, but you can only put it off so long before I just get confused about why things are the way they are.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was forgoing etiquette and the was forgoing self-respect.//</span><br />Typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;-that-//</span><br />Hyphens aren&#039;t for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Slamming her door shut behind her, it only took a moment to realize exactly why the sound was so bad.//</span><br />Misplaced modifier. It doesn&#039;t sound like she&#039;s the one doing the slamming. Leading participles modify the subject, so you&#039;re describing &quot;it&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a grey pegasus blurted out as she landed in front of Octavia, scrambling to collect the scattered parcels.//</span><br />Here, I&#039;ll say that I notice you use a whole lot of participles. Besides creating a repetitive structure, they have their own attendant problems. You have a lot that are misplaced modifiers. I haven&#039;t said anything until now because it&#039;s clear what you mean in most of them, but this one&#039;s truly ambiguous. Who&#039;s &quot;scrambling&quot;? By the rules of grammar, Octavia is, but I bet you meant Derpy. If there was an inanimate object there in the sentence where Octavia is, then I could apply a bit of logic and sort it out, but if you don&#039;t keep modifier placement in mind, you will slip into ambiguous and misleading phrasings at times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With that decision made, and her hind legs rested, she resumed playing.//</span><br />She was going to take a break, then found the rock and thought about it a bit. That took long enough that she&#039;s rested now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Meanwhile, much further down the catwalk//</span><br />You&#039;d kept the story in a very subjective narration so far, so why break it here? And only for a single paragraph? What does it achieve to have the reader see this now? Better to find out about it the same way a character does later on, since you&#039;ll have to do that eventually. There&#039;s not even any tension built here, as we have no reason to know or care what&#039;s in the box or who Sunset Shimmer is. This could go in the next scene, except that it&#039;s easy enough to deduce. I&#039;d recommend cutting it altogether.<br /><br />So if Vinyl is so well-known, why does she live in an apartment no better than Octavia, who lives on donations day to day? And why would Octavia take her instrument there? She was expecting something pretty seedy, and really, what she gets isn&#039;t any better from the perspective of keeping her cello from getting damaged. She&#039;s not exactly on a schedule, either, so why not swing by her apartment to drop it off? It&#039;s nearby.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia&#039;s embarrassment was plain on her face.//</span><br />Don&#039;t I get to see it, too? This is another thing I saw intermittently. It&#039;s more effective to get me to deduce a character&#039;s emotion than to tell me bluntly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“‘scuse me, Octavia.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pegasi guards//</span><br />Noun adjuncts are singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;full blown//</span><br />You have a few spots where you don&#039;t hyphenate a compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She saw Vinyl flip through the air as the magical blast slammed into her, cringing as the unicorn landed with all the grace of a rag doll.//</span><br />Another example of an ambiguous participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia grit her teeth.//</span><br />gritted<br /><br />Indicate direct thoughts with quotes and an appropriate tag or italics.<br /><br />Hyphens constantly used where dashes are needed, and even then, you use them in some places where commas would be more appropriate.<br /><br />Spell out numbers.<br /><br />You also use a ton of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They are inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 263. That&#039;s a little more than one every other sentence on average. That&#039;s how often something isn&#039;t happening in this story. You need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />We&#039;re kind of thrown into this world without much of a picture of how things got this way. The caste system going on here is like that before Hearth&#039;s Warming, but you still reference the princesses, so did that never happen, or has society lapsed back into it somehow? And even in that case, the earth ponies&#039; talent was in producing the food, while you have that happening on the upper tiers where the unicorns live, then what function do they serve in society?<br /><br />It&#039;s possible you address these things in later chapters, and it&#039;s actually a good thing to dole out exposition a little at a time, but you can only put it off so long before I just get confused about why things are the way they are.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Thu, Jul 10th, 2014 21:26</span></div><br/>

ARogueCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 237

>>130858

Heya. First and foremost, thanks for taking the time to read and comment. It is definitely appreciated!

One immediate question, if you don't mind.

>Indicate direct thoughts with quotes and an appropriate tag or italics.

Is this common? I have never read a published work where direct thoughts have been offset by quotes. I actually grabbed a couple books off my shelf to check and found it was simply italicized and offset by commas.

Here's to the next revision!
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130858" onclick="return highlight('130858', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130858">&gt;&gt;130858</a><br /><br />Heya. First and foremost, thanks for taking the time to read and comment. It is definitely appreciated!<br /><br />One immediate question, if you don&#039;t mind.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Indicate direct thoughts with quotes and an appropriate tag or italics.</span><br />Is this common? I have never read a published work where direct thoughts have been offset by quotes. I actually grabbed a couple books off my shelf to check and found it was simply italicized and offset by commas.<br /><br />Here&#039;s to the next revision!<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Wed, Jul 9th, 2014 23:40</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 238

>>130859
It's most common to have thoughts in italics, but you do occasionally see them in quotes, as long as the attribution clearly identifies it as a thought, and even once in a while, differentiating double quotes for spoken dialogue and single quotes for thought.

And one more thing I meant to say about this excerpt:
>She saw Vinyl flip through the air as the magical blast slammed into her, cringing as the unicorn landed with all the grace of a rag doll.//
It's clunky and repetitive to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, but this illustrates another danger of participles: they (and the "as" clauses, for that matter) imply simultaneous actions, so make sure that's actually what you intend. Here, the flipping through the air happens at the same time as the blast hits her (more a cause and effect, but a bit of a gray area), but then Octavia also cringes and sees Vinyl land at the same time. More realistically, the bolt would hit Vinyl, then she'd flip through the air (though again, it wouldn't be too outlandish to have these at the same time), then Octavia grimaces at the same time she sees Vinyl hit the ground.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130859" onclick="return highlight('130859', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130859">&gt;&gt;130859</a><br />It&#039;s most common to have thoughts in italics, but you do occasionally see them in quotes, as long as the attribution clearly identifies it as a thought, and even once in a while, differentiating double quotes for spoken dialogue and single quotes for thought.<br /><br />And one more thing I meant to say about this excerpt:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She saw Vinyl flip through the air as the magical blast slammed into her, cringing as the unicorn landed with all the grace of a rag doll.//</span><br />It&#039;s clunky and repetitive to have two &quot;as&quot; clauses in the same sentence, but this illustrates another danger of participles: they (and the &quot;as&quot; clauses, for that matter) imply simultaneous actions, so make sure that&#039;s actually what you intend. Here, the flipping through the air happens at the same time as the blast hits her (more a cause and effect, but a bit of a gray area), but then Octavia also cringes and sees Vinyl land at the same time. More realistically, the bolt would hit Vinyl, then she&#039;d flip through the air (though again, it wouldn&#039;t be too outlandish to have these at the same time), then Octavia grimaces at the same time she sees Vinyl hit the ground.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Thu, Jul 10th, 2014 21:34</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 239

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>least known//

As a compound modifier, it needs a hyphen.

>High winds caused the arid air to swirl around them, filled with a bitter dust that made one of the smaller of the three mares cough//

Two problems here. First, participles can often be misplaced modifiers. Unless they begin a clause, they like to modify the nearest prior object, so "filled…" would describe "them." In many cases, I could apply a bit of logic and sort things out, but this one's a little ambiguous, since you could have meant it in a figurative sense. Second, "one of the smaller of the three" is empty filler. The phrase implies more than one "smaller" mares, but they have to be compared to another, so this necessarily means one mare is large, and two are small. So you're going through this vague language just to avoid picking between two. If there were a whole crowd, fine, but this is needless obfuscation. Is it the smallest one or the middle one? Just say so.

>sorely-needed//

Conversely, when a compound modifier consists of two words with the first as an -ly adverb, you don't need a hyphen.

>From far away in the hills, the five could see flashes of lightning and hear the booms of thunder//

This doesn't say the thunder and lightning were far away in the hills; it says the ponies were. It's an issue of modifier placement again.

>One of the mares gestured the others to step back, and directed a carefully aimed jet of magic towards the lock//

Missing a "for" there. "Gesture" isn't a transitive verb. See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. You don't need one here, since it's all one clause, and the compound structure isn't lengthy or complex. This is a recurring issue.

>sorrowfully//

Now's not really the time to be telly, since we're being introduced to the characters and getting familiar with them. There's a section up top about show versus tell, too.

>I will change it until morning,” and she cast another protective spell upon the lock.//

You can't just tack any given action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action to do that.

>They hastened up one of the twisting back stairwells, clinging closely to the stone walls//

See, here's another ambiguous participle. Grammatically speaking, the stairwells are clinging to the walls, and to be fair, they actually are. It'd be a valid statement, but i bet you meant it to describe the ponies.

>Then the mare who had not yet spoken rapped gently at the stairwell door.

>
>“May we speak to—”//
Certain words, like "the" and "a," you can get away with repeating. But the use of "spoken/speak" so close here feels repetitive.

>his mane swept back by a simple diadem and clad in a soft red robe//

The subject of this absolute phrase is his mane, not him. His mane isn't clad in a soft red robe.

>~~~//

Why do you have an [hr] character and another one to mark the scene break?

>your Majesty//

The whole phrase is an honorific, so both words would be capitalized.

>carefully-placed//

Same deal as before. No hyphen here.

>“There was a time,” he said, “when I would have said//

Watch the repetition of "said" there. Your dialogue attributions are also very repetitive in structure.

>Your two,” he turned to Flim and Flam, “are petty shysters//

Again, you can't just tack a non-speaking action onto a quote with a comma. You appear to be trying to put a narrative aside in there. Here's how you do one:
Your two—” he turned to Flim and Flam “—are petty shysters
if he stops speaking for the action, or
Your two”—he turned to Flim and Flam—“are petty shysters
if he doesn't. Also be aware that while it has gained common usage, "shyster" is actually a pretty racist term.

>such greed and cruelty such//

More repetition.

>As for you; you are true friends to me//

There's no independent clause before the semicolon.

>‘S’comin’//

For one thing, smart quotes tend to get leading apostrophes backward, as it has here. You have a number of instances of this. But there's no reason to jam the two words together with another apostrophe. There aren't actually any letters missing, which is what the apostrophe would signify. ‘S comin’

These are the few main things that stood out to me: The dialogue is extremely formal to the point of being melodramatic. It feels more like they're reading a script than engaging in real conversation. Everything's so stiff. Possibly with that as a symptom, the other point is that it's an awfully factual story about what should be a very emotional time. I'm getting very little of how the characters feel from their actions or appearance—you're largely using dialogue alone to carry the emotion. It can be more difficult to do so with an omniscient narrator, but there are places where you take a shallow dip into a character's perspective, and that's another way of bringing those feelings out.

As a completed story, there isn't much resolution here, and the main conflict occurs entirely off screen, It may actually have, if Sombra's decision came out of the blue for the rest of them, but there's not even any build-up to it or reaction to the immediate aftermath. We just get told that Sombra's in a form of self-imposed exile, Celestia's been made good, everypony's happy, and for some reason, these Elements have taken on some of their counterparts' habits. It's unclear what sort of significance that's supposed to have.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;least known//</span><br />As a compound modifier, it needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;High winds caused the arid air to swirl around them, filled with a bitter dust that made one of the smaller of the three mares cough//</span><br />Two problems here. First, participles can often be misplaced modifiers. Unless they begin a clause, they like to modify the nearest prior object, so &quot;filled…&quot; would describe &quot;them.&quot; In many cases, I could apply a bit of logic and sort things out, but this one&#039;s a little ambiguous, since you could have meant it in a figurative sense. Second, &quot;one of the smaller of the three&quot; is empty filler. The phrase implies more than one &quot;smaller&quot; mares, but they have to be compared to another, so this necessarily means one mare is large, and two are small. So you&#039;re going through this vague language just to avoid picking between two. If there were a whole crowd, fine, but this is needless obfuscation. Is it the smallest one or the middle one? Just say so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sorely-needed//</span><br />Conversely, when a compound modifier consists of two words with the first as an -ly adverb, you don&#039;t need a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;From far away in the hills, the five could see flashes of lightning and hear the booms of thunder//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t say the thunder and lightning were far away in the hills; it says the ponies were. It&#039;s an issue of modifier placement again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One of the mares gestured the others to step back, and directed a carefully aimed jet of magic towards the lock//</span><br />Missing a &quot;for&quot; there. &quot;Gesture&quot; isn&#039;t a transitive verb. See the section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. You don&#039;t need one here, since it&#039;s all one clause, and the compound structure isn&#039;t lengthy or complex. This is a recurring issue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sorrowfully//</span><br />Now&#039;s not really the time to be telly, since we&#039;re being introduced to the characters and getting familiar with them. There&#039;s a section up top about show versus tell, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I will change it until morning,” and she cast another protective spell upon the lock.//</span><br />You can&#039;t just tack any given action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action to do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They hastened up one of the twisting back stairwells, clinging closely to the stone walls//</span><br />See, here&#039;s another ambiguous participle. Grammatically speaking, the stairwells are clinging to the walls, and to be fair, they actually are. It&#039;d be a valid statement, but i bet you meant it to describe the ponies.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then the mare who had not yet spoken rapped gently at the stairwell door.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;“May we speak to—”//</span><br />Certain words, like &quot;the&quot; and &quot;a,&quot; you can get away with repeating. But the use of &quot;spoken/speak&quot; so close here feels repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his mane swept back by a simple diadem and clad in a soft red robe//</span><br />The subject of this absolute phrase is his mane, not him. His mane isn&#039;t clad in a soft red robe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;~~~//</span><br />Why do you have an [hr] character and another one to mark the scene break?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Majesty//</span><br />The whole phrase is an honorific, so both words would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;carefully-placed//</span><br />Same deal as before. No hyphen here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“There was a time,” he said, “when I would have said//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;said&quot; there. Your dialogue attributions are also very repetitive in structure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your two,” he turned to Flim and Flam, “are petty shysters//</span><br />Again, you can&#039;t just tack a non-speaking action onto a quote with a comma. You appear to be trying to put a narrative aside in there. Here&#039;s how you do one:<br />Your two—” he turned to Flim and Flam “—are petty shysters<br />if he stops speaking for the action, or<br />Your two”—he turned to Flim and Flam—“are petty shysters<br />if he doesn&#039;t. Also be aware that while it has gained common usage, &quot;shyster&quot; is actually a pretty racist term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;such greed and cruelty such//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As for you; you are true friends to me//</span><br />There&#039;s no independent clause before the semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘S’comin’//</span><br />For one thing, smart quotes tend to get leading apostrophes backward, as it has here. You have a number of instances of this. But there&#039;s no reason to jam the two words together with another apostrophe. There aren&#039;t actually any letters missing, which is what the apostrophe would signify. ‘S comin’<br /><br />These are the few main things that stood out to me: The dialogue is extremely formal to the point of being melodramatic. It feels more like they&#039;re reading a script than engaging in real conversation. Everything&#039;s so stiff. Possibly with that as a symptom, the other point is that it&#039;s an awfully factual story about what should be a very emotional time. I&#039;m getting very little of how the characters feel from their actions or appearance—you&#039;re largely using dialogue alone to carry the emotion. It can be more difficult to do so with an omniscient narrator, but there are places where you take a shallow dip into a character&#039;s perspective, and that&#039;s another way of bringing those feelings out.<br /><br />As a completed story, there isn&#039;t much resolution here, and the main conflict occurs entirely off screen, It may actually have, if Sombra&#039;s decision came out of the blue for the rest of them, but there&#039;s not even any build-up to it or reaction to the immediate aftermath. We just get told that Sombra&#039;s in a form of self-imposed exile, Celestia&#039;s been made good, everypony&#039;s happy, and for some reason, these Elements have taken on some of their counterparts&#039; habits. It&#039;s unclear what sort of significance that&#039;s supposed to have.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Jul 15th, 2014 18:30</span></div><br/>

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 240

>>130865
Dear Pre-reader 63.546:

Thank you so much for your feedback! I will take some time to look at your suggestions. Some of your concerns were things that worried me, too. The small things such as misplaced modifiers and the like can easily be dealt with. The tone and pacing might not be, and I'm on the fence about whether or not to try, or to chalk it up as a learning experience, quit trying to be serious, and go back to slice of life/fluff.

I'm stuck with the comic book canon, which is that Sombra's decision did in fact come out of the blue, and wasn't something any of them were expecting. Some of the problem might be that it is comic book canon, not show canon, and needs some sort of explanation or bridge to make it sensible.

I will change "shyster" as soon as I can think of a better term. "Shyster," by the way, is one of those words like "niggardly," which is not racist and whose etymology has nothing to do with racism ("shyster" fr. German "schiesser," "shitter," not "Shylock"), but has acquired a false racist overtone to some people, I suppose, although given my background, I'm surprised that I had never heard of this. In any case, I don't want to offend or shock readers, so out it goes.

I see exactly what you mean about the stiffness and melodramatic tone, and again, I'm not sure if it's fixable. I'm hoping that the fact that you gave it a review means that it might be, although I may not have the writing chops to do it. I think I will stick it in the "Tear My Good Story To Shreds" section of Rage Reviews, and see what one of the reviewers there has to say.

I'm not at all sure it's fixable, but I appreciate the feedback, since I know you really don't have to do this. Thank you!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130865" onclick="return highlight('130865', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130865">&gt;&gt;130865</a><br />Dear Pre-reader 63.546:<br /><br />Thank you so much for your feedback! I will take some time to look at your suggestions. Some of your concerns were things that worried me, too. The small things such as misplaced modifiers and the like can easily be dealt with. The tone and pacing might not be, and I&#039;m on the fence about whether or not to try, or to chalk it up as a learning experience, quit trying to be serious, and go back to slice of life/fluff. <br /><br />I&#039;m stuck with the comic book canon, which is that Sombra&#039;s decision did in fact come out of the blue, and wasn&#039;t something any of them were expecting. Some of the problem might be that it is comic book canon, not show canon, and needs some sort of explanation or bridge to make it sensible.<br /><br />I will change &quot;shyster&quot; as soon as I can think of a better term. &quot;Shyster,&quot; by the way, is one of those words like &quot;niggardly,&quot; which is not racist and whose etymology has nothing to do with racism (&quot;shyster&quot; fr. German &quot;schiesser,&quot; &quot;shitter,&quot; not &quot;Shylock&quot;), but has acquired a false racist overtone to some people, I suppose, although given my background, I&#039;m surprised that I had never heard of this. In any case, I don&#039;t want to offend or shock readers, so out it goes. <br /><br />I see exactly what you mean about the stiffness and melodramatic tone, and again, I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s fixable. I&#039;m hoping that the fact that you gave it a review means that it might be, although I may not have the writing chops to do it. I think I will stick it in the &quot;Tear My Good Story To Shreds&quot; section of Rage Reviews, and see what one of the reviewers there has to say. <br /><br />I&#039;m not at all sure it&#039;s fixable, but I appreciate the feedback, since I know you really don&#039;t have to do this. Thank you!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 241

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>manilla//

manila

>Wonderbolt-related//

Pretty repetitive with the recently-used "academia-related."

>When I applied for school I had to make my own!//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>meticulously-organized//

You don't need a hyphen for two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb.

>she looked awesome//

>The prospect of wearing an official Wonderbolt suit excited her.//
These are incredibly bland for the emotion she should be showing. The second one's rather telly as well, which is a particularly bad idea early in the story, where you're trying to draw me into your characterizations.

>wellbeing//

well-being

>“Rainbow Dash,” Twilight slapped the papers down on the table.//

You can't just tack and given action onto speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action, punctuated as a narrative aside, or made into a separate sentence.

>Feather Flu//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this. Either way is fine, but pick one.

>Twilight shook her head in disbelief.//

Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. In short, the "in disbelief" is entirely superfluous here.

>We’ll take care of this, and then head over to Carousel Boutique to get you fitted for your flight suit.//

In contrast to my third comment, here's a spot where you don't need comma, because it's just a compound structure (and not a lengthy or complex one), not multiple clauses. This is an intermittent issue. I have a section on comma use with conjunctions up top as well.

>“Fine,” Rainbow Dash wrenched her tail out of Twilight’s grip, and stomped past her out the door.//

Another case where you have a non-speaking action masquerading as a speech attribution. At this point, I'll also say that your dialogue structuring is very repetitive. Paragraph after paragraph goes: "Quote." Brief action or dialogue tag. "More speech."

>I- I//

No space after a hyphen when indicating a stutter.

>shouldn’t even phase you//

Phase/faze confusion.

>what?!//

You'll normally see ! or ? italicized when on an italicized word.

>she bit her lip and turned to Twilight.//

I'd say "capitalization error," but I bet this is another one of those non-speaking actions you're trying to use as an attribution.

>paper work//

paperwork

>3//

Write out numbers, unless they're exceedingly long.

>“No, we wouldn’t,” Rainbow Dash mumbled.//

I'm noticing the frequency of "mumble" and "mutter" as a speaking verb. You don't want your choices of them calling attention to themselves. You use "mumble" seven times, which is quite a lot to repeat an unusual speaking verb for this word count. There's a rationale behind this in the section on saidisms.

>how much would you say getting a feather flu shot hurts.//

It's a question, right?

>laid down//

Lay/lie confusion. There's one in Redheart's quote, too, but that could be her misspeaking.

>held up her hoof, which held//

Watch the repetition.

>Rainbow Dash descended sheepishly to the floor.//

I'm only pointing out a couple of these, but this is another bad spot for telling. What does this even look like?

>he stopped as he noted that Rainbow Dash was not a filly.//

Capitalization.

>as he dumped the needle into the waste box//

That's… dangerous. They don't use a sharps container?

>bandaid//

Inconsistent spelling.

>obviously not buying it//

Again, what does this look like? Don't have the narrator draw the conclusion for me. That's not nearly as interesting.

>the boutique//

In the exact same phrasing, you capitalized it earlier. Pick one.

The other issue I'd bring up is one of perspective. You mostly use a limited narrator, who can dip into a character's point of view and speak for her. However, your perspective jumps all over the place. I won't repeat the rationale behind avoiding it; I'll just refer you to the section on head hopping at the top of this thread. But while you're writing, you need to be mindful of what perspective you're using. Do you phrase something in a conversational tone? Do you have the narrator say something that only one character could know? Do you have the narrator expressing a particular character's opinion or judgment? (As a side note, you can still get at some of these things from another perspective. Saying Dash forced her best smile is from her perspective, because only she knows it's forced. But phrasing it as Twilight noticing that her eyes didn't match her grin's sentiment couches it as Twilight's interpretation of Dash's mood.) You switched back and forth between Dash's and Twilight's viewpoints frequently, and you spent a grand total of two sentences in Redheart's head.

Lastly, "to be" verbs. They are inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You need to be choosing more active verbs. I can't catch every instance, because there are a few ambiguous contractions that'd have to be counted manually, but for the easier forms to search with a ctrl-f, I counted 170. That's a little more often than one every other sentence, on average. That's how often something doesn't happen in your story. Just do a search on "was" and watch the screen light up.

That's it for the mechanical and style issues. As to plot, it's a fun story, and I'd tend to let it slide on the strength of that, but it doesn't really come to a conclusion. It's more an extended joke than anything else, and one that's been done before. It would really help your case if you did one simple thing: have Rainbow Dash come to some resolution or realization as a result of her experience. It doesn't have to be some profound thing, and it could even be her rethinking her stance on shots and reaffirming that she hasn't gotten over her fear at all. Something. It gives a sense that it matters what happened in your story, that someone's changed or grown because of it. Otherwise, it's like a filler episode, where you could remove it without affecting what comes after.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;manilla//</span><br />manila<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wonderbolt-related//</span><br />Pretty repetitive with the recently-used &quot;academia-related.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I applied for school I had to make my own!//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;meticulously-organized//</span><br />You don&#039;t need a hyphen for two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she looked awesome//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The prospect of wearing an official Wonderbolt suit excited her.//</span><br />These are incredibly bland for the emotion she should be showing. The second one&#039;s rather telly as well, which is a particularly bad idea early in the story, where you&#039;re trying to draw me into your characterizations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wellbeing//</span><br />well-being<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Rainbow Dash,” Twilight slapped the papers down on the table.//</span><br />You can&#039;t just tack and given action onto speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action, punctuated as a narrative aside, or made into a separate sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Feather Flu//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at capitalizing this. Either way is fine, but pick one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight shook her head in disbelief.//</span><br />Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. In short, the &quot;in disbelief&quot; is entirely superfluous here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We’ll take care of this, and then head over to Carousel Boutique to get you fitted for your flight suit.//</span><br />In contrast to my third comment, here&#039;s a spot where you don&#039;t need comma, because it&#039;s just a compound structure (and not a lengthy or complex one), not multiple clauses. This is an intermittent issue. I have a section on comma use with conjunctions up top as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Fine,” Rainbow Dash wrenched her tail out of Twilight’s grip, and stomped past her out the door.//</span><br />Another case where you have a non-speaking action masquerading as a speech attribution. At this point, I&#039;ll also say that your dialogue structuring is very repetitive. Paragraph after paragraph goes: &quot;Quote.&quot; Brief action or dialogue tag. &quot;More speech.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I- I//</span><br />No space after a hyphen when indicating a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shouldn’t even phase you//</span><br />Phase/faze confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>what</i>?!//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally see ! or ? italicized when on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she bit her lip and turned to Twilight.//</span><br />I&#039;d say &quot;capitalization error,&quot; but I bet this is another one of those non-speaking actions you&#039;re trying to use as an attribution.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;paper work//</span><br />paperwork<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;3//</span><br />Write out numbers, unless they&#039;re exceedingly long.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“No, we wouldn’t,” Rainbow Dash mumbled.//</span><br />I&#039;m noticing the frequency of &quot;mumble&quot; and &quot;mutter&quot; as a speaking verb. You don&#039;t want your choices of them calling attention to themselves. You use &quot;mumble&quot; seven times, which is quite a lot to repeat an unusual speaking verb for this word count. There&#039;s a rationale behind this in the section on saidisms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;how much would you say getting a feather flu shot hurts.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laid down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. There&#039;s one in Redheart&#039;s quote, too, but that could be her misspeaking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;held up her hoof, which held//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash descended sheepishly to the floor.//</span><br />I&#039;m only pointing out a couple of these, but this is another bad spot for telling. What does this even look like?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he stopped as he noted that Rainbow Dash was not a filly.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as he dumped the needle into the waste box//</span><br />That&#039;s… dangerous. They don&#039;t use a sharps container?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bandaid//</span><br />Inconsistent spelling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;obviously not buying it//</span><br />Again, what does this look like? Don&#039;t have the narrator draw the conclusion for me. That&#039;s not nearly as interesting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the boutique//</span><br />In the exact same phrasing, you capitalized it earlier. Pick one.<br /><br />The other issue I&#039;d bring up is one of perspective. You mostly use a limited narrator, who can dip into a character&#039;s point of view and speak for her. However, your perspective jumps all over the place. I won&#039;t repeat the rationale behind avoiding it; I&#039;ll just refer you to the section on head hopping at the top of this thread. But while you&#039;re writing, you need to be mindful of what perspective you&#039;re using. Do you phrase something in a conversational tone? Do you have the narrator say something that only one character could know? Do you have the narrator expressing a particular character&#039;s opinion or judgment? (As a side note, you can still get at some of these things from another perspective. Saying Dash forced her best smile is from her perspective, because only she knows it&#039;s forced. But phrasing it as Twilight noticing that her eyes didn&#039;t match her grin&#039;s sentiment couches it as Twilight&#039;s interpretation of Dash&#039;s mood.) You switched back and forth between Dash&#039;s and Twilight&#039;s viewpoints frequently, and you spent a grand total of two sentences in Redheart&#039;s head.<br /><br />Lastly, &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They are inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what is. You need to be choosing more active verbs. I can&#039;t catch every instance, because there are a few ambiguous contractions that&#039;d have to be counted manually, but for the easier forms to search with a ctrl-f, I counted 170. That&#039;s a little more often than one every other sentence, on average. That&#039;s how often something <i>doesn&#039;t</i> happen in your story. Just do a search on &quot;was&quot; and watch the screen light up.<br /><br />That&#039;s it for the mechanical and style issues. As to plot, it&#039;s a fun story, and I&#039;d tend to let it slide on the strength of that, but it doesn&#039;t really come to a conclusion. It&#039;s more an extended joke than anything else, and one that&#039;s been done before. It would really help your case if you did one simple thing: have Rainbow Dash come to some resolution or realization as a result of her experience. It doesn&#039;t have to be some profound thing, and it could even be her rethinking her stance on shots and reaffirming that she hasn&#039;t gotten over her fear at all. Something. It gives a sense that it matters what happened in your story, that someone&#039;s changed or grown because of it. Otherwise, it&#039;s like a filler episode, where you could remove it without affecting what comes after.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 242

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>several week’s worth//

weeks’

>Look Trixie, forget the mosquitos.//

When in the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

>Minos is throwing it's whole weight into this thing//

Its/it's confusion.

>Gilda continued//

This is the only piece of narration for nine paragraphs. Just two words. Let me see what they're doing as they talk, or they might as well be statues. It's also a more immersive read when you don't rely solely on the dialogue to carry the emotion.

>Griffon Kingdoms//

Not sure whether you meant there to be more than one Griffon Kingdom od if you're just missing an apostrophe.

>Currently, they were letting deer out. The deer walked out of the building//

This is pretty repetitive. At this point, I'll also say that the focus is off-putting here. The scene opens with a one-sentence explanation of how Gilda and Trixie got there, then promptly drops them to go into a very dry explanation of what's happening politically in the country, though it's also very sparing on the context for why things are this way. I can't tell at all whether this is normal (at least under the circumstances) or if nobody could have anticipated what was going on here.

>Gilda called over one of the police officers, and drew her claw over a third of the table. “Keep that stuff, let him keep the rest.” The doe nodded, and cleared away the confiscated goods.//

In the first and last sentences here, you don't need the commas. They aren't separating clauses, just fairly simple compound structures.

>Gilda turned to Trixie, shaking her head.//

Ambiguous modifier. Who's shaking her head? By grammatical conventions, Trixie is, but you probably meant Gilda.

I'm also noticing a lot of repetition. What's stuck in my head recently is the two close uses of "young coconut" and the number of times I saw "looters."

>It’s been cloudy all week and this is still the hottest I’ve ever been.//

Conversely, there are two clauses here (two subjects, each with their own verb: it -> has been, this -> is), so you need a comma. Keep an eye out for these.

>But, I think we can come to a compromise.//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses. There's no grammatical reason to have one here.

>How does that sound.//

It's a question, isn't it?

>“I don’t know why we didn’t try more diplomacy,” she said, “It’s basically just carrot and stick.”//

Dialogue punctuation/capitalization.

>This caught the sergeants attention.//

Missing apostrophe.

There are four main things here.

First, the language is too strong in places. Keep in mind that we're trying to reach a pretty broad audience, and the gratuitous swearing and off-color phrasings go too far.

Second, the narration is rather dry through much of the story. It lists fact after fact after fact without attaching much emotional context to what's happening. That makes it end up feeling rather like reading a list at times.

There are a few spots where you do fine delving into a character's perspective to give their reactions to something, but it jumps around between character enough to feel flighty. It makes the writing feel jerky when it changes perspective too often or abruptly, and for what's here, it may not be necessary to work from any more than a single perspective.

The ending was pretty underwhelming. Part of it is again the lack of an emotional reaction from the characters, but it comes completely out of the blue as well. No mention was made of how they knew anything would be there. Some far-off land, they hear about a war there, and they go profiteering, but they just happened to have this intel? It feels awfully convenient, as they never did anything to acquire the info, so there was no implication they had to do anything to get it. For that matter, it makes the pacing feel off as well. You spent quite a while on the minutiae of deer coming and going, but only 8 sentences on their prize.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;several week’s worth//</span><br />weeks’<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look Trixie, forget the mosquitos.//</span><br />When in the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Minos is throwing it&#039;s whole weight into this thing//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gilda continued//</span><br />This is the only piece of narration for nine paragraphs. Just two words. Let me see what they&#039;re doing as they talk, or they might as well be statues. It&#039;s also a more immersive read when you don&#039;t rely solely on the dialogue to carry the emotion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Griffon Kingdoms//</span><br />Not sure whether you meant there to be more than one Griffon Kingdom od if you&#039;re just missing an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Currently, they were letting deer out. The deer walked out of the building//</span><br />This is pretty repetitive. At this point, I&#039;ll also say that the focus is off-putting here. The scene opens with a one-sentence explanation of how Gilda and Trixie got there, then promptly drops them to go into a very dry explanation of what&#039;s happening politically in the country, though it&#039;s also very sparing on the context for why things are this way. I can&#039;t tell at all whether this is normal (at least under the circumstances) or if nobody could have anticipated what was going on here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gilda called over one of the police officers, and drew her claw over a third of the table. “Keep that stuff, let him keep the rest.” The doe nodded, and cleared away the confiscated goods.//</span><br />In the first and last sentences here, you don&#039;t need the commas. They aren&#039;t separating clauses, just fairly simple compound structures.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gilda turned to Trixie, shaking her head.//</span><br />Ambiguous modifier. Who&#039;s shaking her head? By grammatical conventions, Trixie is, but you probably meant Gilda.<br /><br />I&#039;m also noticing a lot of repetition. What&#039;s stuck in my head recently is the two close uses of &quot;young coconut&quot; and the number of times I saw &quot;looters.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s been cloudy all week and this is still the hottest I’ve ever been.//</span><br />Conversely, there are two clauses here (two subjects, each with their own verb: it -&gt; has been, this -&gt; is), so you need a comma. Keep an eye out for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But, I think we can come to a compromise.//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses. There&#039;s no grammatical reason to have one here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How does that sound.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I don’t know why we didn’t try more diplomacy,” she said, “It’s basically just carrot and stick.”//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation/capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This caught the sergeants attention.//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br />There are four main things here.<br /><br />First, the language is too strong in places. Keep in mind that we&#039;re trying to reach a pretty broad audience, and the gratuitous swearing and off-color phrasings go too far.<br /><br />Second, the narration is rather dry through much of the story. It lists fact after fact after fact without attaching much emotional context to what&#039;s happening. That makes it end up feeling rather like reading a list at times.<br /><br />There are a few spots where you do fine delving into a character&#039;s perspective to give their reactions to something, but it jumps around between character enough to feel flighty. It makes the writing feel jerky when it changes perspective too often or abruptly, and for what&#039;s here, it may not be necessary to work from any more than a single perspective.<br /><br />The ending was pretty underwhelming. Part of it is again the lack of an emotional reaction from the characters, but it comes completely out of the blue as well. No mention was made of how they knew anything would be there. Some far-off land, they hear about a war there, and they go profiteering, but they just happened to have this intel? It feels awfully convenient, as they never did anything to acquire the info, so there was no implication they had to do anything to get it. For that matter, it makes the pacing feel off as well. You spent quite a while on the minutiae of deer coming and going, but only 8 sentences on their prize.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 243

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>signifying that she had heard him//

This rather lacks subtlety. It would have been evident from the way she acted anyway, but it also states as a certainty what Spike couldn't know yet. It's also unnecessarily indirect, as it's the fact that she stopped that's important, not that anything is signified.

>She simply stood there, waiting for him to do something, anything. He tried to move//

I can already see there are likely to be perspective problems. These two sentences abruptly flip from her head to his (the "something, anything" is uniquely her thought process, and she wouldn't know that he tried to move). You don't want the perspective to wander around so much, and definitely not within a paragraph. There's a longer rationale for this in the section about head hopping at the top of this thread.

>He tried to open his mouth//

This is the second sentence in a row to start with this phrasing. That's not necessarily a problem, but two leaves it ambiguous as to whether you're doing something thematic or just had an oversight. If you want repetition for effect, you have to call attention to it somehow, like have the narrator notice it's repeated or use it at least three times. You do have a third item in the list, so if you phrased it the same, then it'd be apparent you did it deliberately.

>still carrying her assortment of flowers//

Odd to mention that, since there's nothing that would suggest she'd do otherwise.

>She continued down the hallway//

This is the exact same action she just took two short paragraphs ago.

>She smiled a little.//

She just did…

>She plodded over to him.//

Not sure that's the best word choice. "Plod" implies a heaviness through fatigue or reluctance. That's not consistent with the way she's been acting.

>Then he noticed the thorns. They were small, but sharp. He hadn’t noticed them at first//

Watch the repetition of "notice."

>He skidded to a halt//

It was described as being only a few doors down and a "trek." Neither would indicate speed, so how did he get going fast enough in that short a distance to necessitate skidding to a halt?

>Twilight was the first to notice his presence.//

Again with "notice." Keep an eye out for words that you're repeating. Sometimes it takes putting the story down for a couple of weeks before looking at it again. Then these kinds of things stand out to you more.

>We were worried sick about you, Spike.//

This wasn't evident from their reaction. Only Twilight said anything, and she was more confrontational than anything.

>Spike kicked at the ground with his right foot, sending some dust flying into the air.//

In a hospital? In the middle of the room? It's more "floor" than "ground," and why would it be so dusty?

>Why is everypony doting on her?//

This sounds a little too old for Spike.

>Reaching down underneath the stand, she pulled up an average-sized glass vase.//

Note that participles imply simultaneous action, but these would happen in sequence.

>The mare in question tossed and turned in her sleep, letting out a little grunt of discomfort when she rolled onto her injured wing. She mumbled something unintelligible before rolling restlessly back onto her other side, desperately searching for sleep’s gentle caress.//

Watch the structural repetition. Both sentences go "main clause, participle." Participles are easy to overuse because they stand out. In fact, that last participle is in Dash's perspective, which is odd because she's not really interacting with anyone or anything, besides the fact that it's another abrupt point-of-view shift.

>concern etching her features//

That's rather blunt. Let me see it if you want it to mean something to me.

>bed-ridden//

bedridden

>Spike stood there like a statue, watching everything unfold before him with alarming stillness.//

The perpective here is unidentifiable. Alarming to whom? Not himself, as he doesn't react to it, and nobody else is paying attention to him.

>She levitated her saddlebags over, pulling out a familiar bouquet of daffodils.//

Another spot where your use of a participle implies concurrent action where there wouldn't be.

>well being//

well-being

>Pinkie darted over to the stereo, pushing the power button with her nose.//

More synchronization issues. You're going to have to scan for these yourself.

>He watered the roses every night, and made sure that they got plenty of sunlight.//

There aren't separate clauses here, so you don't need the comma.

>The Carousel Boutique

The name is just Carousel Boutique.

>lay down next to him//

>laying position//
Lay/lie confusion.

>His eyes slid shut and he folded his arms behind his head.//

Here, there are two clauses, so you need a comma.

>beady//

He's never described them this way until now, but all the other words are the same? Is this a new impression? If not, why hasn't he mentioned it before? The connotations of this word really change the tone of the description.

>"…"//

This passes for dialogue in video games, but not in better fiction. Besides, it tells me nothing about what they're doing in the silence.

>Without warning, Spike sighed.//

Do people normally presage their sighs?

>all of the sudden//

all of a sudden

>Twilight watched him go, a look somewhere between anger and sadness plastered on her face.//

Your perspective's been with Spike. How does he even see this? It's also very telly at a pretty crucial moment.

>He ran in front of her and put a hand out, signifying her to stop.//

The "signifying" thing is odd again, especially since he should know she can't see it.

>He opened his mouth to ask her to say something more, but his mouth snapped shut again immediately after he opened it.

>
>“I… I’ve got to go,” Spike stammered before darting down the hallway.//
This is seemingly contradictory.

>She laid down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>and placed down onto his lap//

Missing word.

>He immediately broke into a sprint//

He just sprinted down the stairs.

>showing that she had heard him approach//

You do a lot of this blunt interpretation of actions. Give the reader some credit. If you write the description well, the motivation behind it will be apparent.

>Oh my god.//

He uses "goddess" elsewhere.

>content to just bask in the glorious silence of friendship//

Are they really friends? They've barely interacted, and about only one or two topics at that.

>bleach-white lily//

That's pretty grim. Those are traditionally used at funerals.

>T-thank//

This is a common mistake. What sound would he actually repeat? Surely not just the "T."

>Spike turned to Roseluck and smiled, and she smiled right back at him.//

That's a lot of smiling going on, especially considering there was another just two sentences back. And another two sentences later. You use this word 39 times in your story. That's a lot for this word count and speaks to a lack of descriptive phrasing.

>She laid sprawled out//

And lay/lie confusion is becoming a systematic problem.

>Suddenly, he wasn’t quite so happy as before.//

Here's a spot where telling works, because the emotion comes over him suddenly, and he's less self-aware about it.

>Celestia-damned//

Sometimes, directly substituting real-world expressions doesn't quite work. This implies she actually has the power to do that, which is a pretty grim idea. And as much as Twilight idolizes Celestia, I doubt she'd disrespect her name like this.

>T-thank//

Same deal with the stutter. This would be pronounced "Tuh-thank."

>‘Sides//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Either paste one in or add a second and delete the first.

>maybe even something more//

I'll comment more on this in the wrap up, but there's nothing in the story to convince me of this.

>“—and//

This would be fine if it were picking up from an earlier sentence that we got to see, but as it's the first part of this thought presented, capitalize it.

>She slammed a hoof down on the countertop, trying to stop laughing; it was to no avail.//

This is also coming out of nowhere. She's never acting any way except pretty emo, so it's odd to see the sudden change. How she gets to be like this around him is a rather important part of their relationship.

>One hundred twenty-three days. Two thousand, nine hundred fifty-two hours. One hundred seventy-seven thousand, one hundred twenty minutes. Ten million, six hundred twenty-seven thousand, two hundred seconds.//

This whole litany is a rather cliched thing to do.

>The kiss was clumsy and awkward at first//

I haven't seen anything in the story to indicate when it takes place, meaning there's also nothing to make me assume it doesn't take place during the show. As such, there's an age problem. How old is Spike? He's known to be several years younger than Twilight, and the girls are all acting like heir show ages. For underage characters, we won't post anything beyond a schoolyard crush.

>The waiter shot him a condescending look//

Not if he wants a tip, he doesn't…

>if such a thing was even possible//

For hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: if such a thing were even possible

>he would die of embarrassment//

Another case where the repetition appears to be a mistake unless you do something to call attention to it, like add emphasis on the "he."

>With a sad smile, Daisy stood up. “If… if you ever want to talk, come and get me, okay?”//

Why does she leave? It's awkward. She just… does. She knows he's upset, I have to think they're well-acquainted by now, and he hasn't asked her to go. This smacks more of "she's leaving because I can't figure out what to have her do."

Now to the overall issues. I'll start with the mundane ones. There were lots of participles, especially in the early going. Besides being repetitive, they caused a number of chronology problems. The perspective jumped around quite a bit as well. For every sentence, you have to keep in mind which character would know the information and whether it's presented as they would perceive it. In addition to the romance angle, it needs to be clear how old Spike is, because much of the narration uses word choices and phrasings that aren't believable for his canon age.

Next is a special kind of repetition, and one that many writers do. You have a lot of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs. Of the forms that are easy to search for, I counted 240. That's almost one every other sentence. That's how often something isn't happening.

Lastly, and most importantly, the treatment of the romance is too shallow to foster much investment in their relationship. There's the default you get for presenting any generic scenario, but there's not a lot of meat to this. First, there's never much presented to show why they work as a couple. Spike talks to her about why she gives out flowers, and from barely more than that, decides that she's a friend and a potential lover. I basically have to take your word for that, as I don't get to see them warm up to each other. They're just together, and the reader has to generate the reasons to care, which some of them will. Then we get to the real romance. We see them hanging out on their same hill, talking the same as they have been all along. There's nothing to show why they have any chemistry, which is where the work in a romance story needs to go. I have to see them behaving like a real couple, but they just rehash the same old material. At least there's the double date, but they're supposed to have been dating for quite some time by then, yet they still behave like they're timid around each other, and there's really no interaction between them. And why does Roseluck keep her illness secret? I know the reason she gives in the story, but that's a completely selfish thing for her to do. First, she alludes to it, which is a horrible tease, then she never brings it up again. Wouldn't she want him to know what he was getting into? Wouldn't she want him to get the most out of their time together? It just seems engineered to generate the most emotional impact possible without doing the work to justify it and make it feel authentic.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;signifying that she had heard him//</span><br />This rather lacks subtlety. It would have been evident from the way she acted anyway, but it also states as a certainty what Spike couldn&#039;t know yet. It&#039;s also unnecessarily indirect, as it&#039;s the fact that she stopped that&#039;s important, not that anything is signified.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She simply stood there, waiting for him to do something, anything. He tried to move//</span><br />I can already see there are likely to be perspective problems. These two sentences abruptly flip from her head to his (the &quot;something, anything&quot; is uniquely her thought process, and she wouldn&#039;t know that he tried to move). You don&#039;t want the perspective to wander around so much, and definitely not within a paragraph. There&#039;s a longer rationale for this in the section about head hopping at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He tried to open his mouth//</span><br />This is the second sentence in a row to start with this phrasing. That&#039;s not necessarily a problem, but two leaves it ambiguous as to whether you&#039;re doing something thematic or just had an oversight. If you want repetition for effect, you have to call attention to it somehow, like have the narrator notice it&#039;s repeated or use it at least three times. You do have a third item in the list, so if you phrased it the same, then it&#039;d be apparent you did it deliberately.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still carrying her assortment of flowers//</span><br />Odd to mention that, since there&#039;s nothing that would suggest she&#039;d do otherwise.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She continued down the hallway//</span><br />This is the exact same action she just took two short paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smiled a little.//</span><br />She just did…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She plodded over to him.//</span><br />Not sure that&#039;s the best word choice. &quot;Plod&quot; implies a heaviness through fatigue or reluctance. That&#039;s not consistent with the way she&#039;s been acting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then he noticed the thorns. They were small, but sharp. He hadn’t noticed them at first//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;notice.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He skidded to a halt//</span><br />It was described as being only a few doors down and a &quot;trek.&quot; Neither would indicate speed, so how did he get going fast enough in that short a distance to necessitate skidding to a halt?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was the first to notice his presence.//</span><br />Again with &quot;notice.&quot; Keep an eye out for words that you&#039;re repeating. Sometimes it takes putting the story down for a couple of weeks before looking at it again. Then these kinds of things stand out to you more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We were worried sick about you, Spike.//</span><br />This wasn&#039;t evident from their reaction. Only Twilight said anything, and she was more confrontational than anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike kicked at the ground with his right foot, sending some dust flying into the air.//</span><br />In a hospital? In the middle of the room? It&#039;s more &quot;floor&quot; than &quot;ground,&quot; and why would it be so dusty?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why is everypony doting on her?//</span><br />This sounds a little too old for Spike.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Reaching down underneath the stand, she pulled up an average-sized glass vase.//</span><br />Note that participles imply simultaneous action, but these would happen in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mare in question tossed and turned in her sleep, letting out a little grunt of discomfort when she rolled onto her injured wing. She mumbled something unintelligible before rolling restlessly back onto her other side, desperately searching for sleep’s gentle caress.//</span><br />Watch the structural repetition. Both sentences go &quot;main clause, participle.&quot; Participles are easy to overuse because they stand out. In fact, that last participle is in Dash&#039;s perspective, which is odd because she&#039;s not really interacting with anyone or anything, besides the fact that it&#039;s another abrupt point-of-view shift.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;concern etching her features//</span><br />That&#039;s rather blunt. Let me see it if you want it to mean something to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bed-ridden//</span><br />bedridden<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike stood there like a statue, watching everything unfold before him with alarming stillness.//</span><br />The perpective here is unidentifiable. Alarming to whom? Not himself, as he doesn&#039;t react to it, and nobody else is paying attention to him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She levitated her saddlebags over, pulling out a familiar bouquet of daffodils.//</span><br />Another spot where your use of a participle implies concurrent action where there wouldn&#039;t be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well being//</span><br />well-being<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie darted over to the stereo, pushing the power button with her nose.//</span><br />More synchronization issues. You&#039;re going to have to scan for these yourself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He watered the roses every night, and made sure that they got plenty of sunlight.//</span><br />There aren&#039;t separate clauses here, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Carousel Boutique</span><br />The name is just Carousel Boutique.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lay down next to him//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying position//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His eyes slid shut and he folded his arms behind his head.//</span><br />Here, there are two clauses, so you need a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;beady//</span><br />He&#039;s never described them this way until now, but all the other words are the same? Is this a new impression? If not, why hasn&#039;t he mentioned it before? The connotations of this word really change the tone of the description.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;…&quot;//</span><br />This passes for dialogue in video games, but not in better fiction. Besides, it tells me nothing about what they&#039;re doing in the silence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without warning, Spike sighed.//</span><br />Do people normally presage their sighs?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all of the sudden//</span><br />all of a sudden<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight watched him go, a look somewhere between anger and sadness plastered on her face.//</span><br />Your perspective&#039;s been with Spike. How does he even see this? It&#039;s also very telly at a pretty crucial moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He ran in front of her and put a hand out, signifying her to stop.//</span><br />The &quot;signifying&quot; thing is odd again, especially since he should know she can&#039;t see it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He opened his mouth to ask her to say something more, but his mouth snapped shut again immediately after he opened it.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I… I’ve got to go,” Spike stammered before darting down the hallway.//</span><br />This is seemingly contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She laid down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and placed down onto his lap//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He immediately broke into a sprint//</span><br />He just sprinted down the stairs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;showing that she had heard him approach//</span><br />You do a lot of this blunt interpretation of actions. Give the reader some credit. If you write the description well, the motivation behind it will be apparent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh my god.//</span><br />He uses &quot;goddess&quot; elsewhere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;content to just bask in the glorious silence of friendship//</span><br />Are they really friends? They&#039;ve barely interacted, and about only one or two topics at that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bleach-white lily//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty grim. Those are traditionally used at funerals.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-thank//</span><br />This is a common mistake. What sound would he actually repeat? Surely not just the &quot;T.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike turned to Roseluck and smiled, and she smiled right back at him.//</span><br />That&#039;s a lot of smiling going on, especially considering there was another just two sentences back. And another two sentences later. You use this word 39 times in your story. That&#039;s a lot for this word count and speaks to a lack of descriptive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She laid sprawled out//</span><br />And lay/lie confusion is becoming a systematic problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suddenly, he wasn’t quite so happy as before.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a spot where telling works, because the emotion comes over him suddenly, and he&#039;s less self-aware about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia-damned//</span><br />Sometimes, directly substituting real-world expressions doesn&#039;t quite work. This implies she actually has the power to do that, which is a pretty grim idea. And as much as Twilight idolizes Celestia, I doubt she&#039;d disrespect her name like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-thank//</span><br />Same deal with the stutter. This would be pronounced &quot;Tuh-thank.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Sides//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Either paste one in or add a second and delete the first.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;maybe even something more//</span><br />I&#039;ll comment more on this in the wrap up, but there&#039;s nothing in the story to convince me of this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“—and//</span><br />This would be fine if it were picking up from an earlier sentence that we got to see, but as it&#039;s the first part of this thought presented, capitalize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She slammed a hoof down on the countertop, trying to stop laughing; it was to no avail.//</span><br />This is also coming out of nowhere. She&#039;s never acting any way except pretty emo, so it&#039;s odd to see the sudden change. How she gets to be like this around him is a rather important part of their relationship.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One hundred twenty-three days. Two thousand, nine hundred fifty-two hours. One hundred seventy-seven thousand, one hundred twenty minutes. Ten million, six hundred twenty-seven thousand, two hundred seconds.//</span><br />This whole litany is a rather cliched thing to do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The kiss was clumsy and awkward at first//</span><br />I haven&#039;t seen anything in the story to indicate when it takes place, meaning there&#039;s also nothing to make me assume it doesn&#039;t take place during the show. As such, there&#039;s an age problem. How old is Spike? He&#039;s known to be several years younger than Twilight, and the girls are all acting like heir show ages. For underage characters, we won&#039;t post anything beyond a schoolyard crush.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The waiter shot him a condescending look//</span><br />Not if he wants a tip, he doesn&#039;t…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if such a thing was even possible//</span><br />For hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: if such a thing were even possible<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he would die of embarrassment//</span><br />Another case where the repetition appears to be a mistake unless you do something to call attention to it, like add emphasis on the &quot;he.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With a sad smile, Daisy stood up. “If… if you ever want to talk, come and get me, okay?”//</span><br />Why does she leave? It&#039;s awkward. She just… does. She knows he&#039;s upset, I have to think they&#039;re well-acquainted by now, and he hasn&#039;t asked her to go. This smacks more of &quot;she&#039;s leaving because I can&#039;t figure out what to have her do.&quot;<br /><br />Now to the overall issues. I&#039;ll start with the mundane ones. There were lots of participles, especially in the early going. Besides being repetitive, they caused a number of chronology problems. The perspective jumped around quite a bit as well. For every sentence, you have to keep in mind which character would know the information and whether it&#039;s presented as they would perceive it. In addition to the romance angle, it needs to be clear how old Spike is, because much of the narration uses word choices and phrasings that aren&#039;t believable for his canon age.<br /><br />Next is a special kind of repetition, and one that many writers do. You have a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs. Of the forms that are easy to search for, I counted 240. That&#039;s almost one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something isn&#039;t happening.<br /><br />Lastly, and most importantly, the treatment of the romance is too shallow to foster much investment in their relationship. There&#039;s the default you get for presenting any generic scenario, but there&#039;s not a lot of meat to this. First, there&#039;s never much presented to show why they work as a couple. Spike talks to her about why she gives out flowers, and from barely more than that, decides that she&#039;s a friend and a potential lover. I basically have to take your word for that, as I don&#039;t get to see them warm up to each other. They&#039;re just together, and the reader has to generate the reasons to care, which some of them will. Then we get to the real romance. We see them hanging out on their same hill, talking the same as they have been all along. There&#039;s nothing to show why they have any chemistry, which is where the work in a romance story needs to go. I have to see them behaving like a real couple, but they just rehash the same old material. At least there&#039;s the double date, but they&#039;re supposed to have been dating for quite some time by then, yet they still behave like they&#039;re timid around each other, and there&#039;s really no interaction between them. And why does Roseluck keep her illness secret? I know the reason she gives in the story, but that&#039;s a completely selfish thing for her to do. First, she alludes to it, which is a horrible tease, then she never brings it up again. Wouldn&#039;t she want him to know what he was getting into? Wouldn&#039;t she want him to get the most out of their time together? It just seems engineered to generate the most emotional impact possible without doing the work to justify it and make it feel authentic.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 244

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I’m afraid Tirek just did too much damage—even by my standards.

>The fire had long since gone out, but piles of soot and ash stood in its place—marking the scene like tombstones.//
In both of these, I don't see what the dash gives you over a comma.

>‘bout//

Smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward, as they have here. Paste one in from somewhere else.

>do you really want a repeat of that awful event?//

But it wouldn't repeat. Spike knows how to cancel the spell now.

>Y-You//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the first part of a stutter.

>something!//

You'll normally see ! or ? italicized when on an italicized word.

>Fluttershy said, resting a hoof around Spike.//

This structure is getting repetitive by now, where you tack a participle onto your speech tag.

>She frowned at the library, “but I guess maybe we should wait till later.//

You can't just tack any action onto a quote with a comma. It has to be a speaking action, and in any case, you need to capitalize the quote, since it's not continuing one from earlier in the sentence.

>rainbow-flavoured//

But when she tasted rainbows at the weather factory, they were really spicy. Doesn't sound like a good flavor for a cupcake.

>we could’ve lost so much more today than just the library. And there are so many other things worth celebrating today//

Watch the close repetition of words, like "today" here.

>She approached him and place one hoof gently on his shoulder.//

Typo.

>Spike stood, letting Twilight’s hoof thump to the ground.//

It was Fluttershy's hoof on him.

>Without looking at her, he said, “You can go ahead. I’m gonna look//

Watch the repetition of "look" here.

>Her eyes turned harsh for a short second—short enough that it could’ve been a trick of the light.//

Your narration is somewhat mixed, feeling omniscient at times and taking on Spike's perspective at others. But those are the only two—I haven't seen anyone else's point of view. But here, the perspective is unidentifiable. Is is a perspective, since it's making a judgment, bu Spike couldn't see this, as Rarity would be turned away from him, so whose perspective is it? And what do you gain by introducing a new perspective, only to spend a single sentence there?

>But there’s no harm in it, and it might help Spike cope a little.//

I get that she's trying to be understanding, but I don't know why she's going about it this way. There's no hurry for her to go look through the castle, the three friends going with her are doing it more out of curiosity than some need, and they're tired anyway. Twilight can tell that Spike needs some closure, but she's just going to leave him behind? What she says right after this also makes her sound rather glib about the whole thing. Moving on is fine, if that's her decision, but as self-aware as she is about it, would she really abandon Spike like this?

>Being so cold with you earlier.//

And Twilight just takes this from him, even going so far as to accept his apology? She's the one being cold and forcing him to move on before he's ready. I'm finding her behavior kind of disturbing.

And then her reaction to the blanket. She's being horribly insensitive here. It just doesn't feel like her. She's supposed to be an expert in friendship, and she's doing a very poor job here.

>His finger made a divot in the fabric//

A divot isn't the impression; it's the material removed that resulted in said impression. So you're saying he carved out a piece of the fabric.

>‘the next room over?’//

This is your choice, but you don't have to put the ? inside the quotes, since it's not part of what Twilight had said.

>Won’t that be great, Spike? A space all to yourself!//

This has gone beyond her pushing him into something new. This smacks of her not really knowing him in the first place, which is pretty tough to believe. As much time as they've spent together, she must know that he enjoys sleeping near her. He's been in situations where he didn't have to, yet he always chose to.

>a bird perch stood in the far corner//

So Owloysius gets to stay with her, but Spike doesn't?

>Seven throne//

Typo.

>He glanced back at the door that led back to his bedroom.//

Watch the repetition of "back."

>What? Sure, I miss that setup, but that new duvet is really awesome.//

I really can't tell whether he's being facetious here. There's no evidence that he isn't saying this in earnest, but he never had that reaction when he was actually using the bed.

Aside from the detailed things, the only overall problem here is that Twilight constantly comes across as cold and cruel to Spike, and yet he's the one who apologizes to her. And when she finally apologizes in return, it's not really for the way she treated him, more about her public image and how she felt about the old library. She comes across as hopelessly oblivious to his feelings, and given what she's the princess of and how well she should know him, it left me with an uneasy feeling the whole time that Twilight wouldn't act like this.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m afraid Tirek just did too much damage—even by my standards.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The fire had long since gone out, but piles of soot and ash stood in its place—marking the scene like tombstones.//</span><br />In both of these, I don&#039;t see what the dash gives you over a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘bout//</span><br />Smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward, as they have here. Paste one in from somewhere else.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;do you really want a repeat of that awful event?//</span><br />But it wouldn&#039;t repeat. Spike knows how to cancel the spell now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Y-You//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>something</i>!//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally see ! or ? italicized when on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy said, resting a hoof around Spike.//</span><br />This structure is getting repetitive by now, where you tack a participle onto your speech tag.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She frowned at the library, “but I guess maybe we should wait till later.//</span><br />You can&#039;t just tack any action onto a quote with a comma. It has to be a speaking action, and in any case, you need to capitalize the quote, since it&#039;s not continuing one from earlier in the sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rainbow-flavoured//</span><br />But when she tasted rainbows at the weather factory, they were really spicy. Doesn&#039;t sound like a good flavor for a cupcake.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we could’ve lost so much more today than just the library. And there are so many other things worth celebrating today//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words, like &quot;today&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She approached him and place one hoof gently on his shoulder.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike stood, letting Twilight’s hoof thump to the ground.//</span><br />It was Fluttershy&#039;s hoof on him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without looking at her, he said, “You can go ahead. I’m gonna look//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;look&quot; here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes turned harsh for a short second—short enough that it could’ve been a trick of the light.//</span><br />Your narration is somewhat mixed, feeling omniscient at times and taking on Spike&#039;s perspective at others. But those are the only two—I haven&#039;t seen anyone else&#039;s point of view. But here, the perspective is unidentifiable. Is <i>is</i> a perspective, since it&#039;s making a judgment, bu Spike couldn&#039;t see this, as Rarity would be turned away from him, so whose perspective is it? And what do you gain by introducing a new perspective, only to spend a single sentence there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But there’s no harm in it, and it might help Spike cope a little.//</span><br />I get that she&#039;s trying to be understanding, but I don&#039;t know why she&#039;s going about it this way. There&#039;s no hurry for her to go look through the castle, the three friends going with her are doing it more out of curiosity than some need, and they&#039;re tired anyway. Twilight can tell that Spike needs some closure, but she&#039;s just going to leave him behind? What she says right after this also makes her sound rather glib about the whole thing. Moving on is fine, if that&#039;s her decision, but as self-aware as she is about it, would she really abandon Spike like this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Being so cold with you earlier.//</span><br />And Twilight just takes this from him, even going so far as to accept his apology? She&#039;s the one being cold and forcing him to move on before he&#039;s ready. I&#039;m finding her behavior kind of disturbing.<br /><br />And then her reaction to the blanket. She&#039;s being horribly insensitive here. It just doesn&#039;t feel like her. She&#039;s supposed to be an expert in friendship, and she&#039;s doing a very poor job here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His finger made a divot in the fabric//</span><br />A divot isn&#039;t the impression; it&#039;s the material removed that resulted in said impression. So you&#039;re saying he carved out a piece of the fabric.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘the next room over?’//</span><br />This is your choice, but you don&#039;t have to put the ? inside the quotes, since it&#039;s not part of what Twilight had said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Won’t that be great, Spike? A space all to yourself!//</span><br />This has gone beyond her pushing him into something new. This smacks of her not really knowing him in the first place, which is pretty tough to believe. As much time as they&#039;ve spent together, she must know that he enjoys sleeping near her. He&#039;s been in situations where he didn&#039;t have to, yet he always chose to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bird perch stood in the far corner//</span><br />So Owloysius gets to stay with her, but Spike doesn&#039;t?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Seven throne//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He glanced back at the door that led back to his bedroom.//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;back.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What? Sure, I miss that setup, but that new duvet is really awesome.//</span><br />I really can&#039;t tell whether he&#039;s being facetious here. There&#039;s no evidence that he isn&#039;t saying this in earnest, but he never had that reaction when he was actually using the bed.<br /><br />Aside from the detailed things, the only overall problem here is that Twilight constantly comes across as cold and cruel to Spike, and yet he&#039;s the one who apologizes to her. And when she finally apologizes in return, it&#039;s not really for the way she treated him, more about her public image and how she felt about the old library. She comes across as hopelessly oblivious to his feelings, and given what she&#039;s the princess of and how well she should know him, it left me with an uneasy feeling the whole time that Twilight wouldn&#039;t act like this.<br />

EQD Feedback: Scars GMPCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 245

>>129713
Sorry to dredge up an old thread, but if you get this note, could you contact me via my fimfic profile and/or email?

I have an EQD related question for you. Thanks for your time!

-GMP<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#129713" onclick="return highlight('129713', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|129713">&gt;&gt;129713</a><br />Sorry to dredge up an old thread, but if you get this note, could you contact me via my fimfic profile and/or email?<br /><br />I have an EQD related question for you. Thanks for your time!<br /><br />-GMP<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 246

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>WHAM!

>
>Crash!
>
>Bam!//
It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration. Just describe them.

>E-emergency Rainbow Dash!//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>Dash exclaimed as she rushed to her window.//

Not counting those sound effects, you already have three "as" clauses in your first three paragraphs. It's making your writing sound very repetitive.

>Derpy followed after Rainbow as they zoomed towards the flames. As they approached the edge of the blaze//

And more of the same.

I'm also noticing a lot of unusual speaking verbs, to the point that they're drawing my attention away from the speech itself. You don't want the reader becoming that aware of it. There's a rationale in the section on saidisms at the top of this thread.

>It’ll help keep it from spreading any further and help anypony on the ground to get through to help, okay?//

So, the keyword is "help" here?

>They all took off in different directions to redistribute what little rain they had to work with. Rainbow Dash took//

Repetition of "took."

>The water tower left her aura, crashing to the ground.//

Here's a danger of participles. They're easy to make into misplaced modifiers. Unless they start a clause, participles like to modify the nearest prior object. In some cases, the reader can apply a little logic and figure out what the writer meant, and while it's likely you meant the water tower crashed to the ground, the grammatical default is that Twilight's aura is, which is also a plausible interpretation, so it leaves your intention ambiguous.

>“Curses!” Twilight stamped a hoof. “How could this have happened!?”//

That's really, really, really cliched and undercuts the story's serious mood.

>Rainbow watched in awe

>Twilight breathed a sigh of relief.
>Twilight nodded in understanding.//
A few examples of telly language. There's a section on show versus tell up top as well. There are times that telly language is olay, and given that this is an action scene, it can be a way to keep the pace quick. Along those lines, the first one of these isn't bad, but the last two are ones where the telling is entirely superfluous. The discussion will explain why.

>Twilight nodded in understanding.//

And then you repeat this sentence exactly just a few paragraphs later.

>Racing out of bed, she threw open her bedroom door.//

Another danger of participles. They signify concurrent action, so you have these two things happening at the same time, while it's more reasonable that they'd happen in sequence.

>Without even realizing it, her hooves were already taking her towards the towering flames at full speed.//

Here's a dangling modifier. "Without even realizing it" should describe Rarity, but it describes her hooves. She doesn't even appear in the clause. And of course her hooves wouldn't realize anything. Be careful with this phrase anyway, as it's pretty cliched as well.

>her parent’s house//

She only has one parent?

>high pitched//

Hyphenate your compound modifiers.

>obfuscated//

Not the best word choice for an action sequence. You don't want the reader having to pause and think about what it means, or worse yet, looking it up. Fancy words are best held for slower moments.

>Racing around above the smoke//

Just used the same verb in the last sentence.

>on hoof//

You used the phrase "on hand" earlier. Be consistent.

>urging her to forsake her own safety to assuage the suffering//

Word choice is suspect here as well. The issue now is that the narrator is speaking in a limited perspective from Dash's point of view, so he needs to sound roughly like her. But I can't see Dash making these word choices, so it creates a disconnect.

>It took Dash a moment to realize what she was holding, or rather, who.//

Technically, this should be "whom," but regarding my previous comment, it would also require Dash to know that, and I doubt she would.

>ground. Pinkie tucked the twins close to her as she and Dash skidded across the ground.//

Repetition of "ground."

>Are you…are you okay?//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>a voice echoed as a cart approached.

>
>A stallion drawing a cart//
Repetitive.

>Worse, was that she knew she wouldn’t even be able to find it again through the smoke.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Her lungs rejected the smoke//

Third use of "smoke" in two paragraphs.

>Halfway up the stairs,//

You're inconsistent about placing a comma after introductory words and phrases like this. Mostly, you go without. Either way is fine (going without is more common in British usage).

>The hot dry air burned her throat and, it was at that point, that she realized her coat was already drying.//

The first comma should go before the conjunction, and the second is unnecessary. But phrases like "at that point" in which the narration directly refers to itself break immersion.

>she stumbled to the top of the stairs where she tripped over something small and soft//

Needs a comma to separate the clauses.

>she just lied there//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Her hoof reflexively recoiled the moment she touched the handle. It burned!//

Hooves are basically like fingernails. It's not going to sense heat that quickly.

>Rarity stumbled away from the burning light. Once she was far enough away, she looked back at Sweetie’s room. It was completely consumed by flames.//

This scene is coming across as very factual. Surely Rarity has an emotional reaction to what she's seeing. When Sweetie Belle's room is full of fire, she's just going to calmly proceed to the next logical place to look? Particularly if you're going to take a limited viewpoint, the narrator should be reflecting Rarity's agitation.

>Luckily, Sweetie Belle managed to fall right on top of her.//

The phrasing makes it sound like Sweetie Belle did so on purpose.

>Finding her just a few feet away, Rarity started towards her.//

Another case where you synchronize actions that should occur in sequence.

>the burning ceiling came down.

>
>The burning debris//
Repetitive.

>Redoubling her efforts, she managed to shift the weight just enough for her to pull herself free.//

The participles are getting just as repetitive as the "as" clauses. This is the third one in the paragraph.

>she laid there a moment//

Lay/lie confusion.

>waiting for the surge of pain to pass. After the worst of it passed//

You'll usually set off a participle with a comma. Repetitive phrasing.

>that she was going to found//

Missing word.

>Alongside Twilight and the mayor, was the Princess of the Night: Luna.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>100%//

Write out numbers as words, unless they're quite long.

>I just-I couldn’t//

Hyphen where you need a dash.

>kicking nearby puddles//

That's more of an "aw shucks" reaction than real despair.

>she shot back//

The exact speaking action as her last quote.

>She hung her head before heading//

I know they're meant in different senses, but it's still a repetitive use of "head."

>like a bit idiot//

Typo.

>she took her frustrations out on Twilight//

Inconsistent with the past perfect tense you've been using.

>Landing next to Rarity’s door, she gave it a sharp series of raps.//

More synchronization problems. I'm not marking all of these.

>Taking wing, she started to explore.//

Three of the last four sentences use a participle, and they even have the same structure. And then so does the first sentence of the next paragraph.

>Dash turned her gaze to the Ponyville hospital. She felt a lump in her throat as she gazed upon it.//

Repetition of "gaze."

>pointing to the wall//

You can cut "to the wall." She already mentioned it, so that part is obvious.

>The worst was when one of the ponies asked for a name she barely recognized and the nurse told the poor stallion that she passed away.//

This is an emotionless fact. Let me see her reaction.

>studying the book before her//

Again, use a comma for the participle.

>Dash defied//

That's a poor choice of speaking verb, as it takes a direct object of the one being defied, not the speech that does so. And it does need a direct object, as it's a transitive verb.

>Even a cursory glance revealed that the fires got close enough to scorch the hairs.//

That's just awkwardly phrased.

>oh-so-slightly//

Cutesy phrasing is undermining the serious mood.

>smoke can be worse since it’s effects linger//

Its/it's confusion.

>Wake up,” she urged. She didn’t stir.//

Ambiguous use of "she." It'll be assumed they have the same antecedent if there's no other potential one in between them.

>taking stand next to her sister//

Syntax is off.

>as she looked out at the blazes.

>
>“We have separated the blaze into five isolated fires//
Repetitive use of "blaze," plus you use a shifting definition of one here.

>Dangit, Rainbow Dash! Did yah oversleep again!//

There's really no need to write such a thick accent for Applejack. Readers know what she sounds like and will fill it in for you. It's more about word choice and expressions for her. You don't want to make her a caricature or push it to the point tat her dialogue is hard to read.

>Applejack ran into Big Mac at the barn. The big, red stallion was hauling an empty cart out of the barn.//

Fairly repetitive use of "barn." You've already said that's where he was.

>Looking back, Dash ran a hoof through her mane.//

Looking back where? Without saying, it sounds like she's looking behind her, which she already was.

>just, gone//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses.

>Dash trailed off//

You don't need to narrate trailing off or cutting off when they're already evident from the punctuation.

>back forth//

Missing word.

>"Right. I'll be right there," she announced, bolting towards Ponyville.//

Repetitive use of "right," and a synchronization problem again.

>Rainbow struggled to catch up to Applejack. "Whoa! What're you doing?" she urged, flying alongside Applejack.//

It wasn't much of a struggle if it took her one short, bland sentence to get there.

>won't me in//

Missing word.

>the hoofsteps above them//

Cut "the." Besides just sounding awkward, it also establishes them as existing before they waited for them.

>we didn't our rain//

Missing word.

>Granny didn't reply, urging Applejack to continue.//

Seemingly contradictory.

>"How awful," Granny said.//

Through this conversation, this sentiment's not coming through for any of them. You're relying on the dialogue alone to carry the emotion, but it'd surely show through their body language as well.

>We could let some ponies stay there tonight if they can't find a proper bed.//

You go back and forth between narration and dialogue four times in this paragraph. You generally want to limit it to twice if possible.

>S-shucks//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated.

>She sighed as she tried to remember the lines she'd rehearsed in her head.//

She's sighing a lot in this scene.

>H-How//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so for the first part of a stutter.

>It might be//

Why scare Apple Bloom with this when AJ has no idea either way? Seems needlessly cruel.

>she curtly said rising to feet and meeting Apple Bloom's glare with one of her own.//

Missing comma and missing word.

>Surely she knows how Apple Bloom's friends're doin'//

I was going to complain about AJ never asking after them. At least you explained that, but now I'm going to complain about Dash not thinking to tell her. Scootaloo would probably be foremost on her mind, so I'm not sure how it slipped away from her.

>charred skeletons of homes and businesses. Many of the ponies were outside of the charred//

More repetition.

>normal, cheerful ponies typical of Ponyville//

"Normal" and "typical" are redundant.

>charred skeleton of a house//

You just used that exact phrase a couple sentences ago. Keep in mind your narration is in Apple Bloom's perspective, and this is some odd word choice for her. It's also odd to have a chapter titled "Aftermath: Applejack" that spends a significant amount of time in Apple Bloom's perspective, especially since we were in Applejack's coming out of the last chapter.

>seen-seen//

You've done this once before. Unless they're really short words, you usually see stutters of partial words and dashes for complete words.

>Mustering her nerve//

And now you've wandered into Cheerilee's point of view. Only she would know this, unless you couch it as Apple Bloom observing something about her that leads her to this conclusion.

>Sweetie Belle's parent's//

Again with her parents? She has two, right?

>charred skeletons//

I'll grant you that it may be tough to come up with a lot of ways to describe smoke and ash, so I cut you some slack in the first chapter. But you've already used this phrase three times in the chapter.

>Shaking off the blow, the looked around at the ponies.//

Typo.

>she'll-she's//

That does need to be a dash.

>towards Ponyville with a huge cart of apple treats. She'd made it about halfway towards Ponyville//

More repetition.

>Silver Spoon-Silver Spoon//

Dash.

>"Yeah," Apple Bloom muttered.//

A lot of muttering and mumbling going on lately.

>couple of dozen ponies//

Lose the "of."

>urged Twilight to stop unloading//

That's not a speaking action, especially since none of what she says accomplishes this.

>The next thing she knew, Applejack found herself just outside Scootaloo's hospital room.//

Authors tend to overuse the "found herself" action. It suggests that the character is caught up in events beyond her perception or control, neither of which is the case here.

>The little filly lied there in her bed

>She lied, motionless, in her bed
>She just lied there//
Lay/lie confusion.

>The tawny unicorn nodded//

You haven't described the doctor yet. For all I know, this refers to Scootaloo.

>At this point//

He really likes this phrase, doesn't he?

>expelling a tear//

Really awkwardly phrased, and the single tear is horribly cliched.

>They-if//

You were doing fine in the first couple of chapters, but I'm finding a lot of hyphens now that need to be dashes.

>picking up her hat and putting it on low over her face//

Why did she put her hat down if she was going to pick it right back up?

>he gently pushed Rarity aside adjusted the mask on Sweetie's face//

Missing word.

>Where's mom and dad//

Capitalize when they're effectively used as names.

>She just gripped her pillow tight as she buried her face in it.//

She has a lot of repetitive actions like this.

>I know of at least five friend's//

Why is that apostrophe there?

>Breathing a deep breath in//

Redundant.

>We'll see yah through this Rarity//

Missing comma for direct address.

The story is quite good, and so is the characterization. The problems are more mechanical and stylistic in nature.

For one, you rely way too much on participles and "as" clauses. They create a repetitive feeling and cause a lot of synchronization problems. You really need to scour the story for these. You also use unusual speaking verbs almost exclusively, to the point that they take attention away from the speech, where it should be. And you use a lot of "to be" verbs. Of the easy forms to search for, here are the counts I came up with for each chapter: 85, 114, 84, 178. Overall, that's a rate of about one every other sentence. This is an inherently boring verb. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You need to be choosing more active verbs. Then there are the more mundane things like consistent lay/lie confusion. I was a little surprised at the number of missing words and typos.

This is a story that's going to live or die based on making an emotional connection with the reader, and there are a number of places where you rely almost exclusively on the dialogue to do that work, at the expense of leaving the narration very factual. That'd be my only overall stylistic issue. Just keep a handle on your narrator's perspective as well.

These aren't all necessarily quick fixes, but I'd like to see this come back in good enough shape to post.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>WHAM!</i></span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Crash!</i></span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Bam!</i>//</span><br />It&#039;s preferred not to put sound effects in narration. Just describe them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;E-emergency Rainbow Dash!//</span><br />Missing a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash exclaimed as she rushed to her window.//</span><br />Not counting those sound effects, you already have three &quot;as&quot; clauses in your first three paragraphs. It&#039;s making your writing sound very repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Derpy followed after Rainbow as they zoomed towards the flames. As they approached the edge of the blaze//</span><br />And more of the same.<br /><br />I&#039;m also noticing a lot of unusual speaking verbs, to the point that they&#039;re drawing my attention away from the speech itself. You don&#039;t want the reader becoming that aware of it. There&#039;s a rationale in the section on saidisms at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’ll help keep it from spreading any further and help anypony on the ground to get through to help, okay?//</span><br />So, the keyword is &quot;help&quot; here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They all took off in different directions to redistribute what little rain they had to work with. Rainbow Dash took//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;took.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The water tower left her aura, crashing to the ground.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a danger of participles. They&#039;re easy to make into misplaced modifiers. Unless they start a clause, participles like to modify the nearest prior object. In some cases, the reader can apply a little logic and figure out what the writer meant, and while it&#039;s likely you meant the water tower crashed to the ground, the grammatical default is that Twilight&#039;s aura is, which is also a plausible interpretation, so it leaves your intention ambiguous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Curses!” Twilight stamped a hoof. “How could this have happened!?”//</span><br />That&#039;s really, really, really cliched and undercuts the story&#039;s serious mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow watched in awe</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight breathed a sigh of relief.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight nodded in understanding.//</span><br />A few examples of telly language. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell up top as well. There are times that telly language is olay, and given that this is an action scene, it can be a way to keep the pace quick. Along those lines, the first one of these isn&#039;t bad, but the last two are ones where the telling is entirely superfluous. The discussion will explain why.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight nodded in understanding.//</span><br />And then you repeat this sentence exactly just a few paragraphs later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Racing out of bed, she threw open her bedroom door.//</span><br />Another danger of participles. They signify concurrent action, so you have these two things happening at the same time, while it&#039;s more reasonable that they&#039;d happen in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without even realizing it, her hooves were already taking her towards the towering flames at full speed.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a dangling modifier. &quot;Without even realizing it&quot; should describe Rarity, but it describes her hooves. She doesn&#039;t even appear in the clause. And of course her hooves wouldn&#039;t realize anything. Be careful with this phrase anyway, as it&#039;s pretty cliched as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her parent’s house//</span><br />She only has one parent?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high pitched//</span><br />Hyphenate your compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;obfuscated//</span><br />Not the best word choice for an action sequence. You don&#039;t want the reader having to pause and think about what it means, or worse yet, looking it up. Fancy words are best held for slower moments.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Racing around above the smoke//</span><br />Just used the same verb in the last sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on hoof//</span><br />You used the phrase &quot;on hand&quot; earlier. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;urging her to forsake her own safety to assuage the suffering//</span><br />Word choice is suspect here as well. The issue now is that the narrator is speaking in a limited perspective from Dash&#039;s point of view, so he needs to sound roughly like her. But I can&#039;t see Dash making these word choices, so it creates a disconnect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It took Dash a moment to realize what she was holding, or rather, who.//</span><br />Technically, this should be &quot;whom,&quot; but regarding my previous comment, it would also require Dash to know that, and I doubt she would.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ground. Pinkie tucked the twins close to her as she and Dash skidded across the ground.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;ground.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Are you…are you okay?//</span><br />Leave a space after the ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a voice echoed as a cart approached. </span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A stallion drawing a cart//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Worse, was that she knew she wouldn’t even be able to find it again through the smoke.//</span><br />No reason to have a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her lungs rejected the smoke//</span><br />Third use of &quot;smoke&quot; in two paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Halfway up the stairs,//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent about placing a comma after introductory words and phrases like this. Mostly, you go without. Either way is fine (going without is more common in British usage).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The hot dry air burned her throat and, it was at that point, that she realized her coat was already drying.//</span><br />The first comma should go before the conjunction, and the second is unnecessary. But phrases like &quot;at that point&quot; in which the narration directly refers to itself break immersion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she stumbled to the top of the stairs where she tripped over something small and soft//</span><br />Needs a comma to separate the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she just lied there//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her hoof reflexively recoiled the moment she touched the handle. It burned!//</span><br />Hooves are basically like fingernails. It&#039;s not going to sense heat that quickly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity stumbled away from the burning light. Once she was far enough away, she looked back at Sweetie’s room. It was completely consumed by flames.//</span><br />This scene is coming across as very factual. Surely Rarity has an emotional reaction to what she&#039;s seeing. When Sweetie Belle&#039;s room is full of fire, she&#039;s just going to calmly proceed to the next logical place to look? Particularly if you&#039;re going to take a limited viewpoint, the narrator should be reflecting Rarity&#039;s agitation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luckily, Sweetie Belle managed to fall right on top of her.//</span><br />The phrasing makes it sound like Sweetie Belle did so on purpose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Finding her just a few feet away, Rarity started towards her.//</span><br />Another case where you synchronize actions that should occur in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the burning ceiling came down.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The burning debris//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Redoubling her efforts, she managed to shift the weight just enough for her to pull herself free.//</span><br />The participles are getting just as repetitive as the &quot;as&quot; clauses. This is the third one in the paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she laid there a moment//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waiting for the surge of pain to pass. After the worst of it passed//</span><br />You&#039;ll usually set off a participle with a comma. Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that she was going to found//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Alongside Twilight and the mayor, was the Princess of the Night: Luna.//</span><br />No reason to have a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;100%//</span><br />Write out numbers as words, unless they&#039;re quite long.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I just-I couldn’t//</span><br />Hyphen where you need a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;kicking nearby puddles//</span><br />That&#039;s more of an &quot;aw shucks&quot; reaction than real despair.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she shot back//</span><br />The exact speaking action as her last quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She hung her head before heading//</span><br />I know they&#039;re meant in different senses, but it&#039;s still a repetitive use of &quot;head.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like a bit idiot//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she took her frustrations out on Twilight//</span><br />Inconsistent with the past perfect tense you&#039;ve been using.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Landing next to Rarity’s door, she gave it a sharp series of raps.//</span><br />More synchronization problems. I&#039;m not marking all of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Taking wing, she started to explore.//</span><br />Three of the last four sentences use a participle, and they even have the same structure. And then so does the first sentence of the next paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash turned her gaze to the Ponyville hospital. She felt a lump in her throat as she gazed upon it.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;gaze.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pointing to the wall//</span><br />You can cut &quot;to the wall.&quot; She already mentioned it, so that part is obvious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The worst was when one of the ponies asked for a name she barely recognized and the nurse told the poor stallion that she passed away.//</span><br />This is an emotionless fact. Let me see her reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;studying the book before her//</span><br />Again, use a comma for the participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash defied//</span><br />That&#039;s a poor choice of speaking verb, as it takes a direct object of the one being defied, not the speech that does so. And it does need a direct object, as it&#039;s a transitive verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even a cursory glance revealed that the fires got close enough to scorch the hairs.//</span><br />That&#039;s just awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;oh-so-slightly//</span><br />Cutesy phrasing is undermining the serious mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;smoke can be worse since it’s effects linger//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wake up,” she urged. She didn’t stir.//</span><br />Ambiguous use of &quot;she.&quot; It&#039;ll be assumed they have the same antecedent if there&#039;s no other potential one in between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taking stand next to her sister//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she looked out at the blazes.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“We have separated the blaze into five isolated fires//</span><br />Repetitive use of &quot;blaze,&quot; plus you use a shifting definition of one here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dangit, Rainbow Dash! Did yah oversleep again!//</span><br />There&#039;s really no need to write such a thick accent for Applejack. Readers know what she sounds like and will fill it in for you. It&#039;s more about word choice and expressions for her. You don&#039;t want to make her a caricature or push it to the point tat her dialogue is hard to read.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack ran into Big Mac at the barn. The big, red stallion was hauling an empty cart out of the barn.//</span><br />Fairly repetitive use of &quot;barn.&quot; You&#039;ve already said that&#039;s where he was.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Looking back, Dash ran a hoof through her mane.//</span><br />Looking back where? Without saying, it sounds like she&#039;s looking behind her, which she already was.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just, gone//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash trailed off//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to narrate trailing off or cutting off when they&#039;re already evident from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back forth//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Right. I&#039;ll be right there,&quot; she announced, bolting towards Ponyville.//</span><br />Repetitive use of &quot;right,&quot; and a synchronization problem again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow struggled to catch up to Applejack. &quot;Whoa! What&#039;re you doing?&quot; she urged, flying alongside Applejack.//</span><br />It wasn&#039;t much of a struggle if it took her one short, bland sentence to get there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;won&#039;t me in//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the hoofsteps above them//</span><br />Cut &quot;the.&quot; Besides just sounding awkward, it also establishes them as existing before they waited for them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we didn&#039;t our rain//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Granny didn&#039;t reply, urging Applejack to continue.//</span><br />Seemingly contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;How awful,&quot; Granny said.//</span><br />Through this conversation, this sentiment&#039;s not coming through for any of them. You&#039;re relying on the dialogue alone to carry the emotion, but it&#039;d surely show through their body language as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We could let some ponies stay there tonight if they can&#039;t find a proper bed.//</span><br />You go back and forth between narration and dialogue four times in this paragraph. You generally want to limit it to twice if possible.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S-shucks//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sighed as she tried to remember the lines she&#039;d rehearsed in her head.//</span><br />She&#039;s sighing a lot in this scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;H-How//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so for the first part of a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It might be//</span><br />Why scare Apple Bloom with this when AJ has no idea either way? Seems needlessly cruel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she curtly said rising to feet and meeting Apple Bloom&#039;s glare with one of her own.//</span><br />Missing comma and missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Surely she knows how Apple Bloom&#039;s friends&#039;re doin&#039;//</span><br />I was going to complain about AJ never asking after them. At least you explained that, but now I&#039;m going to complain about Dash not thinking to tell her. Scootaloo would probably be foremost on her mind, so I&#039;m not sure how it slipped away from her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;charred skeletons of homes and businesses. Many of the ponies were outside of the charred//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;normal, cheerful ponies typical of Ponyville//</span><br />&quot;Normal&quot; and &quot;typical&quot; are redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;charred skeleton of a house//</span><br />You just used that exact phrase a couple sentences ago. Keep in mind your narration is in Apple Bloom&#039;s perspective, and this is some odd word choice for her. It&#039;s also odd to have a chapter titled &quot;Aftermath: Applejack&quot; that spends a significant amount of time in Apple Bloom&#039;s perspective, especially since we were in Applejack&#039;s coming out of the last chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;seen-seen//</span><br />You&#039;ve done this once before. Unless they&#039;re really short words, you usually see stutters of partial words and dashes for complete words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mustering her nerve//</span><br />And now you&#039;ve wandered into Cheerilee&#039;s point of view. Only she would know this, unless you couch it as Apple Bloom observing something about her that leads her to this conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle&#039;s parent&#039;s//</span><br />Again with her parents? She has two, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;charred skeletons//</span><br />I&#039;ll grant you that it may be tough to come up with a lot of ways to describe smoke and ash, so I cut you some slack in the first chapter. But you&#039;ve already used this phrase three times in the chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shaking off the blow, the looked around at the ponies.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she&#039;ll-she&#039;s//</span><br />That does need to be a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;towards Ponyville with a huge cart of apple treats. She&#039;d made it about halfway towards Ponyville//</span><br />More repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silver Spoon-Silver Spoon//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Yeah,&quot; Apple Bloom muttered.//</span><br />A lot of muttering and mumbling going on lately.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;couple of dozen ponies//</span><br />Lose the &quot;of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;urged Twilight to stop unloading//</span><br />That&#039;s not a speaking action, especially since none of what she says accomplishes this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The next thing she knew, Applejack found herself just outside Scootaloo&#039;s hospital room.//</span><br />Authors tend to overuse the &quot;found herself&quot; action. It suggests that the character is caught up in events beyond her perception or control, neither of which is the case here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The little filly lied there in her bed</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She lied, motionless, in her bed</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She just lied there//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The tawny unicorn nodded//</span><br />You haven&#039;t described the doctor yet. For all I know, this refers to Scootaloo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At this point//</span><br />He really likes this phrase, doesn&#039;t he?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;expelling a tear//</span><br />Really awkwardly phrased, and the single tear is horribly cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They-if//</span><br />You were doing fine in the first couple of chapters, but I&#039;m finding a lot of hyphens now that need to be dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;picking up her hat and putting it on low over her face//</span><br />Why did she put her hat down if she was going to pick it right back up?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he gently pushed Rarity aside adjusted the mask on Sweetie&#039;s face//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Where&#039;s mom and dad//</span><br />Capitalize when they&#039;re effectively used as names.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She just gripped her pillow tight as she buried her face in it.//</span><br />She has a lot of repetitive actions like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know of at least five friend&#039;s//</span><br />Why is that apostrophe there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Breathing a deep breath in//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We&#039;ll see yah through this Rarity//</span><br />Missing comma for direct address.<br /><br />The story is quite good, and so is the characterization. The problems are more mechanical and stylistic in nature.<br /><br />For one, you rely way too much on participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses. They create a repetitive feeling and cause a lot of synchronization problems. You really need to scour the story for these. You also use unusual speaking verbs almost exclusively, to the point that they take attention away from the speech, where it should be. And you use a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Of the easy forms to search for, here are the counts I came up with for each chapter: 85, 114, 84, 178. Overall, that&#039;s a rate of about one every other sentence. This is an inherently boring verb. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You need to be choosing more active verbs. Then there are the more mundane things like consistent lay/lie confusion. I was a little surprised at the number of missing words and typos.<br /><br />This is a story that&#039;s going to live or die based on making an emotional connection with the reader, and there are a number of places where you rely almost exclusively on the dialogue to do that work, at the expense of leaving the narration very factual. That&#039;d be my only overall stylistic issue. Just keep a handle on your narrator&#039;s perspective as well.<br /><br />These aren&#039;t all necessarily quick fixes, but I&#039;d like to see this come back in good enough shape to post.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 247

>>130881
You're free to ask questions here. It is a discussion thread as well, if need be. I use a different name on FiMFiction and prefer to keep the two activities separate.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130881" onclick="return highlight('130881', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130881">&gt;&gt;130881</a><br />You&#039;re free to ask questions here. It is a discussion thread as well, if need be. I use a different name on FiMFiction and prefer to keep the two activities separate.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 248

>>130883
Ok<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130883" onclick="return highlight('130883', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130883">&gt;&gt;130883</a><br />Ok<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 249

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>masked desperados//

Repetitive, since Thomas just called Bruce that.

>Sorry dad//

Needs a comma for direct address, and when it's effectively used as a name, capitalize Mom or Dad.

>I’m sure that you were no different when you were his age.//

Missing the closing quotation marks.

>Thomas said admonishingly, though his eyes betrayed his amusement//

Beware directly telling the reader how a character feels. Times to avoid this include key emotional moments, when we first meet an important character, and at the beginning and end of scenes, chapters, or the entire work. There's a section at the top of this thread explaining how to spot the most obvious offending language and a rationale for why it's counterproductive.

>They were just stepping outside of the Monarch Theater.//

I can already tell I'm going to encounter way too many "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring, as it's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. I'll tally them up at the end, but look at this paragraph as an example. You have five of these verbs in only four sentences.

>Thomas Wayne laughed,//

Be careful of your choice of speaking verbs. We'll see as I get further into the story whether this was just a questionable choice or if you are one of those authors who tries to tack non-speaking actions onto quotes. Assuming for now it's the former, then I'll just say that "laugh" is an iffy speaking verb at best, but it may be okay for a very short quote. But I can't see him laughing that entire one, especially since it doesn't suit his mood at all by the end of it.

>Sorry dad//

Direct address and capitalization again. You'll just have to scan for these. I'm not going to mark them all.

>ice-cream//

That's not a hyphenated word.

>Bruce’s head jerked up, “Really!?” he asked, face alight.//

So you are one of those authors who likes to tack non-speaking actions onto quotes with a comma. Don't do that. It's even redundant to try, as you've put an attribution afterward.

>Thomas Wayne nodded sagely, “Really.”//

Okay, I'm not going to mark any more of these either. But if you put an action on a quote with a comma, it has to be a speaking action.

>Can I get double scoop?//

Missing word.

>Thomas and Bruce both turned around to face Martha. “And what would that be, Martha dear?” Thomas asked. //

Looks like there's an extra blank line after this paragraph.

>Thomas spoke up//

You just used that speaking action recently. Have a look at the section on saidisms at the top of this thread. There are only a few speaking verbs that pass by virtually unnoticed. The rest are fine for flavor, but you don't want too many of them.

>she sounded slightly aghast at the idea.//

Capitalization.

>“Cake!” exclaimed Bruce, “Whoopee!”//

Also have a look at the dialogue punctuation/capitalization section. You can only transition out of a quote and back in like this if both parts of the quote form a single sentence, but they don't here. They're obviously punctuated as separate sentences.

>He was frozen.//

Yes, you already said that.

>The man with the gun smiled, it was a sinister smile//

Comma splice.

>the smile that a psycho-killer would smile in a horror movie right before he pulled out an axe and started chopping people up. But this wasn’t a movie.//

Two problems here. First, your narrator is in Bruce's perspective. Child Bruce. And child Bruce presumably hasn't seen horror movies with psycho killers, so what's his frame of reference for this? Second, he should be so dominated by fear here that he'd focus on more precise description of the smile in more concrete terms. If he has time to think about what it reminds him of, it undercuts the tension, unless the action is actually paused here, which you haven't indicated. He should have more of a raw, visceral reaction.

>At first he’s disoriented//

Show me this. Don't leave it as a cold fact. Let me see what he does, what images rush into his head before he can sort it out.

>He’s drenched in sweat, his bedding and pillows are soaked; the sheets have been kicked off.//

Semicolons suggest a formalism that doesn't work well with the comma splice that comes before.

>His body’s trembling; his heart’s pounding like a drum; he can hear the sound in his ears, droning out every other noise.//

Unless they separate items in a superlist, it's pretty clunky to use more than one semicolon in a sentence.

>THUMP, THUMP, THUMP, THUMP//

Don't use sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

>his arms coil into steel springs and his hands ball into fists in front of his chest//

Needs a comma between the clauses. There's an explanation in the section about comma use with conjunctions.

>This all happens//

Use of demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns is often immersion breaking, as it's the narration making note of itself.

>He stands like that for a tense second, as he gathers himself//

Minor point, but using a comma with an "as" clause creates a feel of "because," while going without creates a feel of "at the same time that."

>he speaks into the shadows//

Repetitive with how you'd described her as coming out of the shadows.

>She resembles a horse but to compare her to one would be to compare a chicken to a swan.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. This full description of her feels out of place. You can assume the reader knows who Luna is and what she looks like, and it's not necessary for Bruce's benefit either, as he's apparently met her before.

>though that too would be a shallow comparison//

Another comma needed. I've marked a few examples. You should sweep for the rest.

>Luna sighs, “That is not what I meant, Bruce Wayne.”//

Another questionable choice of speaking verb. This is also another common problem with dialogue. Look how often she uses direct address. That's just not done in natural conversation.

>so-inclined//

That's not a hyphenated phrase.

>she asked innocently

>Luna smiled, and said//
Why the lapse into past tense?

>at your quarters//

The usual phrasing is "in" your quarters.

It's fine to double space after a sentence, but be aware that FiMFiction sometimes put the line break in the middle of it, leaving you with small indentations in the left margin in places.

>earth//

As you've referenced it,this would be capitalized.

>looking affronted//

Describe it for me. That'll get me much more into Bruce's viewpoint.

>gourmet//

Really odd word choice. I'm not sure this means what you think it does. It's more someone who enjoys fine food and drink, not one who prepares it.

>pallet//

palate

>The last time Bruce Wayne had eaten any kind of meat, had been over six months ago: in his own world.//

No need for that comma, and that's an awkward place for a colon.

>the only animal product they cultivate is milk//

Don't they use eggs in their baking? If not, why keep chickens? They don't have any other use.

>he is shocked to see plate after plate heaped high with meats of every kind//

Again, let me see it. You've taken on a limited narrator, so you can have the narration carry his thoughts, opinions and reactions: But when he walks into the dining hall—what? Bacon, sausage, pork chops… He caught himself before tearing into the feast, since he really should seem as civilized as possible. For Luna's sake.

>a small white pony appears at his side, and starts speaking to him in Equestrian.//

Here's the opposite problem. That's all one clause, so it doesn't need a comma.

>Luna says with an amused look.

>
>Bruce looks//
Watch the close repetition of "look."

>walls” Luna says//

Missing comma.

>He echoes.//

I don't know what this means. Did he think this? It's not rendered as a speech attribution. As a separate sentence, it doesn't fit in.

>between out nations//

Typo.

>Aether//

Why is this capitalized? And why is Bruce Wayne using a British spelling?

>now empty//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>My knowledge of Equestria’s economy is somewhat lacking I’m afraid.//

Missing comma.

>slide of steak//

Can't say I'm familiar with this terminology. Perhaps a typo?

>For those that are so inclined, meat is available, but not economical.//

For one who claims not to understand economics, why is she making an economic argument?

>After I learned what protein was//

They really don't know? Nobody in Equestria has that as a dietary need? Or they wouldn't have learned of it from carnivorous races? That's pretty basic science to be ignorant of.

>I am only trying to help you, Bruce Wayne.”//

Since the next paragraph immediately picks up with another quote of hers, you don't need the closing quotation marks here.

>Bruce stares at her warily. Luna stares back, smiling.//

There's an awful lot of staring going on in this scene.

>The question has taken him off guard//

So let the narration reflect his agitation and shock. This is an emotionless fact.

>blind-sided//

blindsided

>Luna takes her glass in horn and takes a long sip.//

Close repetition of "takes."

>Luna’s face and tone betray nothing, but Bruce can tell she’s surprised. Just the slightest twitch of her eyes gives it away. When she wants to, Luna can transform her features into those of a smiling statue.//

Here's an example of two things: good emotional context, through which we can infer Luna's mood through how she looks and acts, versus having the narrator bluntly tell us, and good use of the limited narration to delve beyond the facts to present Bruce's personal thoughts and impressions. These are the kinds of things I'm looking for throughout the story.

>Bruce doesn’t answer.//

I appreciate minimalism, but it would help to get a little more variety in sentence structure. It's quite rare for you to start a sentence of narration with anything but the subject, which also leads to a lot of sentences that start with a name.

>fresh, almost sweet. Every breath feels cool and refreshing//

Kind of repetitive.

>it burns and scratches the throat like a murder of crows//

Your simile is lost on me. How would crows burn and scratch his throat? Scratch, I guess from talons, but it's just odd to even picture crows being in there to do that. And about the burn, I have no idea.

>Batman steps to the edge of the tower veranda, the street is all but invisible below him.//

Comma splice.

>He takes another breath, and steels himself; quashing the burgeoning fear.//

The participle would be set off with a comma, not a semicolon, and the existing comma is unnecessary.

>The wind roars at him, whipping at him//

Repetitive "at him." Really, you could just cut the first one.

>He has to time this perfectly, if he makes a single mistake//

Comma splice.

>Everything slows down.//

Your paragraph indentation gets weird here. This can vary by browser or how you imported the story.

>Batman grabs his cape and spears his arms out to either side, instantly he’s jerked upward//

Comma splice.

>eighty story//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>his knees audibly pop//

As opposed to inaudibly?

>Well that’s something he thinks.//

Missing comma between the thought and the attribution.

>repels//

Rappels, except that refers specifically to a descent.

>Feigned surprise passes over her face.//

What about it makes him decide it's feigned?

You refer to both a balcony and a veranda here. Which is it? They're different things, and a veranda is often on the ground floor.

>“I’m fine,” he says, annoyed.//

Use the narration to have him express his annoyance. Don't just tell me. If an actor came on TV and said, "I'm annoyed," how interesting would that be? Show me the things that actor would do to get across his character's emotion. There's a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, since I seem to be finding a lot of tell spots.

>“I insist.” She says firmly.//

Dialogue punctuation/capitalization.

>and the pain begins to fade, when she opens her eyes//

Comma splice.

>and in its place, is a slight tingling sensation.//

Unnecessary comma.

>Do not worry yourself, Bruce Wayne//

Still, she's calling him by name way too often for a natural-sounding conversation. But what I wanted to point out here is that she's calling him Bruce while the narration is calling him Batman. Insofar as the narration is limited, that would reflect how he sees the situation. So he thinks of himself as Batman right now, but Luna isn't calling him that. Why not? Has he asked her to? Does she not know he goes by that?

>if I was a pony//

Hypothetical statements use subjunctive mood: if I were a pony.

>“for example//

Capitalization.

>but he’d need to see the spell working in real time, to prove it//

Unnecessary comma.

>He tests out his arms and legs, nothing.//

A comma doesn't feel right there. Perhaps a dash.

>back in place. “Thank you,” he says, turning back//

Close repetition of "back."

>says “if//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>I apologize, ‘twas not my intent.//

Comma splice. And smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Paste one in the right way.

>“You fear that when you return to your city that you will not be able to protect it.”//

Would he also be concerned about what's happening in Gotham City during his absence? He never mentions it.

>Bruce doesn’t reply; just stares off into the starry horizon.//

The formalism of a semicolon is contradicted by the use of a sentence fragment.

>They call me,//

Commas are not for dramatic pauses.

>really!?

Capitalization.

>“Okay, boys, let’s go get some ice-cream.//

Missing the closing quotation marks.

>Blood is everywhere.//

I'm not sure how you're deciding verb tense. You rendered the last dream sequences in past tense, so I don't know why you're using present here, particularly since this picks right up from one in the last chapter that was past tense.

>the words spoken slowly through its massive teeth, blood dripping down its chin//

It's clunky to stack up like elements in a sentence, like the two absolute phrases here.

>The pain is excruciating.//

That's rather bland to get it across to the reader.

>broken-glass-voice//

Lose the second hyphen.

>Batman is walking down an alley with his two little sidekicks—when suddenly//

I don't see what the dash accomplishes here. A comma wouldn't change anything.

>Man-Bat brings Batman’s face to his, until they’re scarcely an inch apart.//

They were barely any further apart to start with.

>droplets of bloody spittle fly into Batman’s face as he speaks.//

Capitalization. And this is already the ninth instance of "blood" in the first screenful.

>He tries to desperately to move//

Extraneous word.

>fight!//

You've been italicizing ! or ? when they're on italicized words, which is the preferred way. Be consistent.

>He just lays there//

Lay/lie confusion. Lay/laid/had laid/ takes a direct object. Lie/lay/had lain/ does not.

>says “Don’t//

Missing comma.

>Perfectly//

Why is this capitalized?

>super villains//

Usually rendered as a single word.

>small time//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>ENOUGH!//

Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis or volume.

>a voice thundered out

Another tense shift.

>Suddenly//

You just used this ten words ago. It's also a word that inexperienced writers tend to overuse. If it's sudden, let the narration reflect that.

>CRACK//

Just put it in normal font. It's a valid word.

>and as suddenly as it appeared//

And repeating this word again in the same paragraph.

>blinded, then the filters in his visor adjust and begin to compensate for his blinded//

Repetition of "blinded."

>but before him is no horse , her body is a hurricane made flesh//

Extraneous space and a comma splice.

>Her head is lowered, horn pointed towards Man-Bat.//

You've started four straight sentences with the same word, and it's not creating a thematic effect.

>There's a flash if exquisite pain//

Typo, and he's so stoic about the pain that it's not real to the reader. Surely he reacts to it in some way.

>It’s just a dream; albeit, a very lucid one.//

Misused semicolon. You don't have an independent clause after it.

>it’s not too hard to imagine how he must look right now, his shoulder and chest are soaked in moist warmth underneath his armor//

Comma splice.

>She goes

>her aura//
Extraneous spaces.

>It’s not a human skull, the teeth are too long//

Comma splice.

>But Batman knows beyond any possible doubt, that the skull is looking at him.//

Unnecessary comma.

>Slowly, the claw moves towards the skull and places one bony talon to its teeth conspiratorially. The skull slowly//

Repetition of "slowly."

>shadows//

The use of this word is also getting repetitive.

>Move damn it!//

Missing comma.

>He felt a fury rise up in him//

Tense switch again.

>rake a bloody triptych gashes//

Missing word, and a somewhat odd use of "triptych." It connotes pictures, which would be non-real representations. It would create the feel that they were superficial.

>Shock and horror fight for dominance upon Luna’s face//

Show me.

>says “Not//

Missing comma.

>me,Luna//

Missing space.

>I do not intend to run, nightmare, I intend to fly.//

Missing closing quotation marks.

>You think you’re pretty fluffy wings will save you//

Your/you're confusion.

>beating with stolen life.

>
>Luna beats her wings//
Repetition of "beat."

At this point, I'm just seeing the same problems over and over, so I'll only bring up new ones.

>to hurt harm him//

Syntax is off.

>ten foot

>twenty five foot//
Hyphenate the compound modifiers.

>I just hope you don’t have to do that again, anytime soon.//

Unnecessary comma.

>I fear that is only a matter of time//

Missing word.

>deathdeath//

Not sure what's going on here.

>Restorative magic has never been my strength, and my strength is fading//

Repetitive.

>flash bang//

flashbang

>you !//

Extraneous space.

>takee//

Typo.

>82nd//

Spell out numbers this short.

>eighty two//

Missing hyphen.

>and the takes shape//

Typo.

>Nestled against the wall opposite the elevator//

The fact that he's taking all this space to describe the Bat Cave undercuts the action. It suggests he has time to pause.

>florescent//

fluorescent

>Inside, are racks filled with batarangs//

Absolutely no reason for that comma to be there.

>twenty five-thousand//

You're right in that there needs to be a hyphen there. You're wrong in where you chose to put it.

>twenty three//

You really need to go back through your numbers. You're missing several hyphens.

>plunges the blade into Man-Bat’s chest//

Even if he knows academically that he's not killing, I'm not sure he could go through with an action that would kill under normal circumstances. Wouldn't he find this unsettling? As opposed as he is to guns, for instance, I doubt he could bring himself to shoot Man-Bat, even if he knew it wasn't real.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;masked desperados//</span><br />Repetitive, since Thomas just called Bruce that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sorry dad//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address, and when it&#039;s effectively used as a name, capitalize Mom or Dad.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sure that you were no different when you were his age.//</span><br />Missing the closing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thomas said admonishingly, though his eyes betrayed his amusement//</span><br />Beware directly telling the reader how a character feels. Times to avoid this include key emotional moments, when we first meet an important character, and at the beginning and end of scenes, chapters, or the entire work. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread explaining how to spot the most obvious offending language and a rationale for why it&#039;s counterproductive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They were just stepping outside of the Monarch Theater.//</span><br />I can already tell I&#039;m going to encounter way too many &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring, as it&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. I&#039;ll tally them up at the end, but look at this paragraph as an example. You have five of these verbs in only four sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thomas Wayne laughed,//</span><br />Be careful of your choice of speaking verbs. We&#039;ll see as I get further into the story whether this was just a questionable choice or if you are one of those authors who tries to tack non-speaking actions onto quotes. Assuming for now it&#039;s the former, then I&#039;ll just say that &quot;laugh&quot; is an iffy speaking verb at best, but it may be okay for a very short quote. But I can&#039;t see him laughing that entire one, especially since it doesn&#039;t suit his mood at all by the end of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sorry dad//</span><br />Direct address and capitalization again. You&#039;ll just have to scan for these. I&#039;m not going to mark them all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ice-cream//</span><br />That&#039;s not a hyphenated word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bruce’s head jerked up, “Really!?” he asked, face alight.//</span><br />So you are one of those authors who likes to tack non-speaking actions onto quotes with a comma. Don&#039;t do that. It&#039;s even redundant to try, as you&#039;ve put an attribution afterward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thomas Wayne nodded sagely, “Really.”//</span><br />Okay, I&#039;m not going to mark any more of these either. But if you put an action on a quote with a comma, it has to be a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Can I get double scoop?//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thomas and Bruce both turned around to face Martha. “And what would that be, Martha dear?” Thomas asked. //</span><br />Looks like there&#039;s an extra blank line after this paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thomas spoke up//</span><br />You just used that speaking action recently. Have a look at the section on saidisms at the top of this thread. There are only a few speaking verbs that pass by virtually unnoticed. The rest are fine for flavor, but you don&#039;t want too many of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she sounded slightly aghast at the idea.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Cake!” exclaimed Bruce, “Whoopee!”//</span><br />Also have a look at the dialogue punctuation/capitalization section. You can only transition out of a quote and back in like this if both parts of the quote form a single sentence, but they don&#039;t here. They&#039;re obviously punctuated as separate sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was frozen.//</span><br />Yes, you already said that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The man with the gun smiled, it was a sinister smile//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the smile that a psycho-killer would smile in a horror movie right before he pulled out an axe and started chopping people up. But this wasn’t a movie.//</span><br />Two problems here. First, your narrator is in Bruce&#039;s perspective. Child Bruce. And child Bruce presumably hasn&#039;t seen horror movies with psycho killers, so what&#039;s his frame of reference for this? Second, he should be so dominated by fear here that he&#039;d focus on more precise description of the smile in more concrete terms. If he has time to think about what it reminds him of, it undercuts the tension, unless the action is actually paused here, which you haven&#039;t indicated. He should have more of a raw, visceral reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At first he’s disoriented//</span><br />Show me this. Don&#039;t leave it as a cold fact. Let me see what he does, what images rush into his head before he can sort it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He’s drenched in sweat, his bedding and pillows are soaked; the sheets have been kicked off.//</span><br />Semicolons suggest a formalism that doesn&#039;t work well with the comma splice that comes before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His body’s trembling; his heart’s pounding like a drum; he can hear the sound in his ears, droning out every other noise.//</span><br />Unless they separate items in a superlist, it&#039;s pretty clunky to use more than one semicolon in a sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;THUMP, THUMP, THUMP, THUMP//</span><br />Don&#039;t use sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his arms coil into steel springs and his hands ball into fists in front of his chest//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses. There&#039;s an explanation in the section about comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This all happens//</span><br />Use of demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns is often immersion breaking, as it&#039;s the narration making note of itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He stands like that for a tense second, as he gathers himself//</span><br />Minor point, but using a comma with an &quot;as&quot; clause creates a feel of &quot;because,&quot; while going without creates a feel of &quot;at the same time that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he speaks into the shadows//</span><br />Repetitive with how you&#039;d described her as coming out of the shadows.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She resembles a horse but to compare her to one would be to compare a chicken to a swan.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses. This full description of her feels out of place. You can assume the reader knows who Luna is and what she looks like, and it&#039;s not necessary for Bruce&#039;s benefit either, as he&#039;s apparently met her before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;though that too would be a shallow comparison//</span><br />Another comma needed. I&#039;ve marked a few examples. You should sweep for the rest.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna sighs, “That is not what I meant, Bruce Wayne.”//</span><br />Another questionable choice of speaking verb. This is also another common problem with dialogue. Look how often she uses direct address. That&#039;s just not done in natural conversation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so-inclined//</span><br />That&#039;s not a hyphenated phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she asked innocently</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna smiled, and said//</span><br />Why the lapse into past tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at your quarters//</span><br />The usual phrasing is &quot;in&quot; your quarters.<br /><br />It&#039;s fine to double space after a sentence, but be aware that FiMFiction sometimes put the line break in the middle of it, leaving you with small indentations in the left margin in places.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;earth//</span><br />As you&#039;ve referenced it,this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking affronted//</span><br />Describe it for me. That&#039;ll get me much more into Bruce&#039;s viewpoint.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gourmet//</span><br />Really odd word choice. I&#039;m not sure this means what you think it does. It&#039;s more someone who enjoys fine food and drink, not one who prepares it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pallet//</span><br />palate<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The last time Bruce Wayne had eaten any kind of meat, had been over six months ago: in his own world.//</span><br />No need for that comma, and that&#039;s an awkward place for a colon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the only animal product they cultivate is milk//</span><br />Don&#039;t they use eggs in their baking? If not, why keep chickens? They don&#039;t have any other use.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he is shocked to see plate after plate heaped high with meats of every kind//</span><br />Again, let me see it. You&#039;ve taken on a limited narrator, so you can have the narration carry his thoughts, opinions and reactions: But when he walks into the dining hall—what? Bacon, sausage, pork chops… He caught himself before tearing into the feast, since he really should seem as civilized as possible. For Luna&#039;s sake.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a small white pony appears at his side, and starts speaking to him in Equestrian.//</span><br />Here&#039;s the opposite problem. That&#039;s all one clause, so it doesn&#039;t need a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna says with an amused look.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bruce looks//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;look.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;walls” Luna says//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He echoes.//</span><br />I don&#039;t know what this means. Did he think this? It&#039;s not rendered as a speech attribution. As a separate sentence, it doesn&#039;t fit in.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;between out nations//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Aether//</span><br />Why is this capitalized? And why is Bruce Wayne using a British spelling?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now empty//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My knowledge of Equestria’s economy is somewhat lacking I’m afraid.//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;slide of steak//</span><br />Can&#039;t say I&#039;m familiar with this terminology. Perhaps a typo?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For those that are so inclined, meat is available, but not economical.//</span><br />For one who claims not to understand economics, why is she making an economic argument?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After I learned what protein was//</span><br />They really don&#039;t know? Nobody in Equestria has that as a dietary need? Or they wouldn&#039;t have learned of it from carnivorous races? That&#039;s pretty basic science to be ignorant of.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am only trying to help you, Bruce Wayne.”//</span><br />Since the next paragraph immediately picks up with another quote of hers, you don&#039;t need the closing quotation marks here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bruce stares at her warily. Luna stares back, smiling.//</span><br />There&#039;s an awful lot of staring going on in this scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The question has taken him off guard//</span><br />So let the narration reflect his agitation and shock. This is an emotionless fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blind-sided//</span><br />blindsided<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna takes her glass in horn and takes a long sip.//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;takes.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna’s face and tone betray nothing, but Bruce can tell she’s surprised. Just the slightest twitch of her eyes gives it away. When she wants to, Luna can transform her features into those of a smiling statue.//</span><br />Here&#039;s an example of two things: good emotional context, through which we can infer Luna&#039;s mood through how she looks and acts, versus having the narrator bluntly tell us, and good use of the limited narration to delve beyond the facts to present Bruce&#039;s personal thoughts and impressions. These are the kinds of things I&#039;m looking for throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bruce doesn’t answer.//</span><br />I appreciate minimalism, but it would help to get a little more variety in sentence structure. It&#039;s quite rare for you to start a sentence of narration with anything but the subject, which also leads to a lot of sentences that start with a name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fresh, almost sweet. Every breath feels cool and refreshing//</span><br />Kind of repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it burns and scratches the throat like a murder of crows//</span><br />Your simile is lost on me. How would crows burn and scratch his throat? Scratch, I guess from talons, but it&#039;s just odd to even picture crows being in there to do that. And about the burn, I have no idea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Batman steps to the edge of the tower veranda, the street is all but invisible below him.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He takes another breath, and steels himself; quashing the burgeoning fear.//</span><br />The participle would be set off with a comma, not a semicolon, and the existing comma is unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The wind roars at him, whipping at him//</span><br />Repetitive &quot;at him.&quot; Really, you could just cut the first one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He has to time this perfectly, if he makes a single mistake//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everything slows down.//</span><br />Your paragraph indentation gets weird here. This can vary by browser or how you imported the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Batman grabs his cape and spears his arms out to either side, instantly he’s jerked upward//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eighty story//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his knees audibly pop//</span><br />As opposed to inaudibly?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Well that’s something</i> he thinks.//</span><br />Missing comma between the thought and the attribution.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;repels//</span><br />Rappels, except that refers specifically to a descent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Feigned surprise passes over her face.//</span><br />What about it makes him decide it&#039;s feigned?<br /><br />You refer to both a balcony and a veranda here. Which is it? They&#039;re different things, and a veranda is often on the ground floor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I’m fine,” he says, annoyed.//</span><br />Use the narration to have him express his annoyance. Don&#039;t just tell me. If an actor came on TV and said, &quot;I&#039;m annoyed,&quot; how interesting would that be? Show me the things that actor would do to get across his character&#039;s emotion. There&#039;s a section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, since I seem to be finding a lot of tell spots.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I insist.” She says firmly.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation/capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the pain begins to fade, when she opens her eyes//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and in its place, is a slight tingling sensation.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do not worry yourself, Bruce Wayne//</span><br />Still, she&#039;s calling him by name way too often for a natural-sounding conversation. But what I wanted to point out here is that she&#039;s calling him Bruce while the narration is calling him Batman. Insofar as the narration is limited, that would reflect how he sees the situation. So he thinks of himself as Batman right now, but Luna isn&#039;t calling him that. Why not? Has he asked her to? Does she not know he goes by that?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if I was a pony//</span><br />Hypothetical statements use subjunctive mood: if I were a pony.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“for example//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but he’d need to see the spell working in real time, to prove it//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He tests out his arms and legs, nothing.//</span><br />A comma doesn&#039;t feel right there. Perhaps a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back in place. “Thank you,” he says, turning back//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;back.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;says “if//</span><br />Punctuation/capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I apologize, ‘twas not my intent.//</span><br />Comma splice. And smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Paste one in the right way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You fear that when you return to your city that you will not be able to protect it.”//</span><br />Would he also be concerned about what&#039;s happening in Gotham City during his absence? He never mentions it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bruce doesn’t reply; just stares off into the starry horizon.//</span><br />The formalism of a semicolon is contradicted by the use of a sentence fragment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They call me,//</span><br />Commas are not for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;really!?</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Okay, boys, let’s go get some ice-cream.//</span><br />Missing the closing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Blood is everywhere.//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure how you&#039;re deciding verb tense. You rendered the last dream sequences in past tense, so I don&#039;t know why you&#039;re using present here, particularly since this picks right up from one in the last chapter that was past tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the words spoken slowly through its massive teeth, blood dripping down its chin//</span><br />It&#039;s clunky to stack up like elements in a sentence, like the two absolute phrases here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pain is excruciating.//</span><br />That&#039;s rather bland to get it across to the reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;broken-glass-voice//</span><br />Lose the second hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Batman is walking down an alley with his two little sidekicks—when suddenly//</span><br />I don&#039;t see what the dash accomplishes here. A comma wouldn&#039;t change anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Man-Bat brings Batman’s face to his, until they’re scarcely an inch apart.//</span><br />They were barely any further apart to start with.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;droplets of bloody spittle fly into Batman’s face as he speaks.//</span><br />Capitalization. And this is already the ninth instance of &quot;blood&quot; in the first screenful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He tries to desperately to move//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>fight</i>!//</span><br />You&#039;ve been italicizing ! or ? when they&#039;re on italicized words, which is the preferred way. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He just lays there//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. Lay/laid/had laid/ takes a direct object. Lie/lay/had lain/ does not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;says “Don’t//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Perfectly//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;super villains//</span><br />Usually rendered as a single word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;small time//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ENOUGH!//</span><br />Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis or volume.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a voice thundered out</span><br />Another tense shift.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suddenly//</span><br />You just used this ten words ago. It&#039;s also a word that inexperienced writers tend to overuse. If it&#039;s sudden, let the narration reflect that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;CRACK//</span><br />Just put it in normal font. It&#039;s a valid word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and as suddenly as it appeared//</span><br />And repeating this word again in the same paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blinded, then the filters in his visor adjust and begin to compensate for his blinded//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;blinded.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before him is no horse , her body is a hurricane made flesh//</span><br />Extraneous space and a comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her head is lowered, horn pointed towards Man-Bat.//</span><br />You&#039;ve started four straight sentences with the same word, and it&#039;s not creating a thematic effect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s a flash if exquisite pain//</span><br />Typo, and he&#039;s so stoic about the pain that it&#039;s not real to the reader. Surely he reacts to it in some way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s just a dream; albeit, a very lucid one.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. You don&#039;t have an independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s not too hard to imagine how he must look right now, his shoulder and chest are soaked in moist warmth underneath his armor//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She goes</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her aura//</span><br />Extraneous spaces.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s not a human skull, the teeth are too long//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But Batman knows beyond any possible doubt, that the skull is looking at him.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Slowly, the claw moves towards the skull and places one bony talon to its teeth conspiratorially. The skull slowly//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;slowly.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shadows//</span><br />The use of this word is also getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Move damn it!</i>//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He felt a fury rise up in him//</span><br />Tense switch again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rake a bloody triptych gashes//</span><br />Missing word, and a somewhat odd use of &quot;triptych.&quot; It connotes pictures, which would be non-real representations. It would create the feel that they were superficial.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shock and horror fight for dominance upon Luna’s face//</span><br />Show me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;says “Not//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;me,Luna//</span><br />Missing space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I do not intend to run, nightmare, I intend to fly.//</span><br />Missing closing quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You think you’re pretty fluffy wings will save you//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;beating with stolen life.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna beats her wings//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;beat.&quot;<br /><br />At this point, I&#039;m just seeing the same problems over and over, so I&#039;ll only bring up new ones.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to hurt harm him//</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ten foot</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;twenty five foot//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I just hope you don’t have to do that again, anytime soon.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I fear that is only a matter of time//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;death<i>death</i>//</span><br />Not sure what&#039;s going on here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Restorative magic has never been my strength, and my strength is fading//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flash bang//</span><br />flashbang<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you !//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;takee//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;82nd//</span><br />Spell out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eighty two//</span><br />Missing hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the takes shape//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nestled against the wall opposite the elevator//</span><br />The fact that he&#039;s taking all this space to describe the Bat Cave undercuts the action. It suggests he has time to pause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;florescent//</span><br />fluorescent<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Inside, are racks filled with batarangs//</span><br />Absolutely no reason for that comma to be there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;twenty five-thousand//</span><br />You&#039;re right in that there needs to be a hyphen there. You&#039;re wrong in where you chose to put it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;twenty three//</span><br />You really need to go back through your numbers. You&#039;re missing several hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;plunges the blade into Man-Bat’s chest//</span><br />Even if he knows academically that he&#039;s not killing, I&#039;m not sure he could go through with an action that would kill under normal circumstances. Wouldn&#039;t he find this unsettling? As opposed as he is to guns, for instance, I doubt he could bring himself to shoot Man-Bat, even if he knew it wasn&#039;t real.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 250

>>130886
So, what are the overall issues? First, the mechanical ones. It should be obvious by the frequency with which I had to point things out. Luna uses direct address far too often for reasonable conversation, you have lots of comma splices, non-speaking actions tacked onto speech with commas, missing commas for speech attributions, some missing quotation marks, spots of inappropriate telling, verb tense shifts, sound effects in narration, most of your semicolons are misused, multiple semicolons in a sentence, repetition of words, phrases, and sentence structures. You also use quite a lot of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs.

Partly because of the telling, the narration is pretty dry and doesn't do enough to carry the emotion. Much of that is left solely to the dialogue, and this is most apparent in the two dream sequences from the first chapter, which were pretty dull.

On the good side, the action sequences kept up my interest, you have a nice, dark mood going, and your characterization of Bruce is quite good. His skepticism of Luna and his aloofness come across very well, and it was on the strength of that that I decided to give you a more detailed review.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130886" onclick="return highlight('130886', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130886">&gt;&gt;130886</a><br />So, what are the overall issues? First, the mechanical ones. It should be obvious by the frequency with which I had to point things out. Luna uses direct address far too often for reasonable conversation, you have lots of comma splices, non-speaking actions tacked onto speech with commas, missing commas for speech attributions, some missing quotation marks, spots of inappropriate telling, verb tense shifts, sound effects in narration, most of your semicolons are misused, multiple semicolons in a sentence, repetition of words, phrases, and sentence structures. You also use quite a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />Partly because of the telling, the narration is pretty dry and doesn&#039;t do enough to carry the emotion. Much of that is left solely to the dialogue, and this is most apparent in the two dream sequences from the first chapter, which were pretty dull.<br /><br />On the good side, the action sequences kept up my interest, you have a nice, dark mood going, and your characterization of Bruce is quite good. His skepticism of Luna and his aloofness come across very well, and it was on the strength of that that I decided to give you a more detailed review.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 251

>>130887
I appreciate the effort and time that you have expended to bring these issues to my attention.

You've definitely given me some food for thought.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130887" onclick="return highlight('130887', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130887">&gt;&gt;130887</a><br />I appreciate the effort and time that you have expended to bring these issues to my attention.<br /><br />You&#039;ve definitely given me some food for thought.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 252

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The first few mornings had been terrible.//

It's not practical to rid your story of all "to be" verbs, but it's a good idea to use active language where you can. The beginning of a story is a good place to do so, since it immediately creates action. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You have three already in the first paragraph.

>after-effect//

>side effects//
I realize these are different things, but I been you could rephrase one of them to sound less repetitive.

>remembered— vague//

If you're using en dashes, put a space on both sides. For an em dash, don't leave space on either side. Make a sweep for these.

>sweet metallic//

These are coordinate adjectives and need a comma between them.

>For those first few mornings//

This looks intentional, but there aren't enough cues there for me to assume it isn't a mistake. If it's something that ties in with a thematic element that's already been established, repetition can work. Otherwise, you have to call attention to it so that the reader knows it's deliberate. For instance, placing an "and" before this final one.

>For the first time in her life//

Now you've begun three sentences in a row with the same word.

>Luna’s beautiful night//

References to the princesses' possession of the sun, moon, night, day, etc. are very cliched.

>along with any movie night where Rainbow Dash was in charge of the film//

What does this even mean? It's never explained, so what's the point of bringing it up?

>little critters were nocturnal; they needed just as much love and care as her little day-dwelling friends//

Watch the repetition of "little."

>(Twilight was busy, and apparently Rainbow Dash would have given the stallion the wrong impression)//

Parentheticals like this are best suited for a very conversational narration, like first-person or a very deep third-person limited. Why not just state this outright without the parentheses?

>It was supposed to be a nice night out//

You really gloss over this bar scene. It's not going to carry as much weight if we just see it summarized after the fact. Since it's the whole setup for what happens in the story, I'd recommend spending a little time in there with them.

>Rarity had fallen into a bit of a slump, and had hit the bottle hard//

There's a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You don't need one here, since it's a single clause.

>Fluttershy babbled in panic, as she held Rarity’s limp body in her hooves.//

"As" clauses are a little trickier. With a comma, they tend to create a feel of "because," and without, a feel of "at the same time that." Also, I'd rather see her act panicked than to have you tell me that's how she feels. There's an explanation in the section on show versus tell.

>dimly-lit//

Compound modifiers don't take a hyphen if they're two-word phrases that start with an -ly adverb.

>that stallion, left with Sassaflash//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses.

>lamp post//

lamppost

>sweet metallic//

Repetitive with the way you described it before.

>tongue. as//

Incorrect punctuation.

>Fluttershy darted forward and licked at the blood, before pulling back in horror.//

Unnecessary comma. And don't tell me she's horrified. Show me.

>She watched as the two pinprick holes closed over, the only sign of their encounter was a faint stain of pink against the pale white-gray of Rarity’s coat.//

Comma splice. You used this exact "two pinprick holes" phrasing earlier in the same paragraph. And spelled it differently.

>Fluttershy babbled in panic//

Another phrasing you've used before, word for word.

>Fluttershy lifted her friend over her shoulders. and took flight.//

Extraneous punctuation. And the last time she lifted Rarity like this, it took an "uncanny and unknown strength." It sounds rather routine here.

>Carousel Boutique was not far from the park, and she flew with amazing speed.//

You've been keeping the story in Fluttershy's perspective, so it's odd for her to make the "amazing speed" judgment about herself.

>her eyes did not match the flowing pink mane or her pale-gold coat//

Odd to characterize "the" mane, but "her" coat. One implies a distance, while the other doesn't.

>It— It’s//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the first instance in a stutter.

>“So-you’re-a-vampire-pony-and-you-attacked-one-of-your-best-friends-last-night”//

Use either the quotes or the hyphens. You don't need both.

>Rarity sat on a chair, still a little woozy from blood loss.//

She was perfectly fine in the previous scene. And Fluttershy was never described as drinking much.

>H-How//

Capitalization

>Ponyville Express//

Underline or (preferably) italicize the name of a newspaper.

>Princess Celestia has always denied requests from reporters to allow interviews with the so-called saviors of Equestria.//

Why would Celestia be acting as their press agent?

>again…” Rarity’s blush intensified; her cheeks nearly outshone Twilight’s light spell. “…i-if//

You look like you're trying to put a narrative aside in the quote. Here's how:
again—” Rarity’s blush intensified; her cheeks nearly outshone Twilight’s light spell “—i-if

>“Ya heard Twi; ya need to replenish yer blood, and it ain’t gunna help if it’s all in yer face!”//

Don't overwrite her accent. The reader already knows what she sounds like, and you don't want to make it more difficult to read. Getting her voice right is more about word choice and phrasing.

>“Dibs being fed on next!”//

Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis.

>Princess Celestia frowned at the newspapers laying before her.//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Ponyville Express//

>Manehattan Journal//
>Vanhoover Daily//
>Hive Today//
>Appleloosan Gazette//
>Canterlot Times//
>Canterlot Digest//
Italicize.

>“welcomed our new vampony overlords.”//

This is inconsistent with the way you've formatted the other newspaper quotes. This way is actually preferable. There's no reason to italicize them.

>Luna chuckled as she entered the room.//

You've been using a lot of questionable speaking verbs. This one in particular turns up frequently. You don't want your choice of speaking verbs to stand out more than the speech itself. There's a rationale given in the section on saidisms.

>‘Twas//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, as has happened here.

>“Oh, Tia… you’re no fun anymore.”//

Why does she suddenly drop the formal language here?

>Affection and pranking in one.//

This seems more from Luna's perspective, but the scene has been with Celestia's until now.

>Celestia shrieked, as Luna nuzzled her sister, wiping some of the smelly timberwolf ichor into her cheek.//

Misplaced modifier. "Wiping…" will tend to modify the nearest prior object. If it had been an inanimate object, I could apply a little logi and sort it out, but this is truly ambiguous. Grammatically speaking, Celestia performs this action, but I bet you meant for Luna to.

>WHAT USURPER WOULDST//

The conjugation is just "would" for third person.

>“And you did not think to inform Us?”//

So she capitalizes the pronoun for herself but not for Celestia?

>‘tis//

Another backward apostrophe.

>Ceased.

>
>That is a word. Not really a likeable nor dislikeable word. Just a word. No matter.//
Either you're saying that Fluttershy would actually think this with all the activity happening outside or your narrator is getting awfully meta. Neither one is a good thing.

>throng//

You just used that word.

>THY SUBJECTS//

Whom is she addressing? They're her subjects, right?

>What she saw outside made her practically crap herself.//

This doesn't seem like something Fluttershy would say.

>Strapped to her back was the most intimidating crossbow Fluttershy had ever seen.//

These sentences have an incredibly repetitive structure. And given a crossbow's reload time, they're only briefly intimidating.

>‘tis//

Backward apostrophe. There are more of these. You'll have to find them.

>the powerful buck of the princess//

These indirect possessions are often clunky. If you phrase it as "the princess's powerful buck," it loses nothing and is more direct and concise.

>Luna stepped through, barricading the door behind her.//

Another danger of participles: they synchronize actions. You're saying these happen at the same time, when it's more logical to have one happen after the other.

>leathery wings//

you just said this one sentence ago.

>do thee//

dost thou

>You’re a vampire, Fluttershy, a creature of the night, like myself and many others.//

Why is she dropping the formal speech again?

>thou hath//

hast

>to not//

Swap these.

I guess this means Luna is a vampire? That brings up some points that are never explained. Does Celestia know? If not, shouldn't Luna swear Fluttershy to secrecy? And if Celestia does know, she probably has for a long time, and could have gradually introduced the idea to the public. I just kind of have to accept this without explanation.

That said, this wasn't a bad story at all. A lot of niggling mechanical things and some spots of unapt telling, but nothing too daunting.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The first few mornings had been terrible.//</span><br />It&#039;s not practical to rid your story of all &quot;to be&quot; verbs, but it&#039;s a good idea to use active language where you can. The beginning of a story is a good place to do so, since it immediately creates action. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You have three already in the first paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after-effect//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;side effects//</span><br />I realize these are different things, but I been you could rephrase one of them to sound less repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;remembered— vague//</span><br />If you&#039;re using en dashes, put a space on both sides. For an em dash, don&#039;t leave space on either side. Make a sweep for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sweet metallic//</span><br />These are coordinate adjectives and need a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For those first few mornings//</span><br />This looks intentional, but there aren&#039;t enough cues there for me to assume it isn&#039;t a mistake. If it&#039;s something that ties in with a thematic element that&#039;s already been established, repetition can work. Otherwise, you have to call attention to it so that the reader knows it&#039;s deliberate. For instance, placing an &quot;and&quot; before this final one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For the first time in her life//</span><br />Now you&#039;ve begun three sentences in a row with the same word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna’s beautiful night//</span><br />References to the princesses&#039; possession of the sun, moon, night, day, etc. are very cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;along with any movie night where Rainbow Dash was in charge of the film//</span><br />What does this even mean? It&#039;s never explained, so what&#039;s the point of bringing it up?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little critters were nocturnal; they needed just as much love and care as her little day-dwelling friends//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;little.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(Twilight was busy, and apparently Rainbow Dash would have given the stallion the wrong impression)//</span><br />Parentheticals like this are best suited for a very conversational narration, like first-person or a very deep third-person limited. Why not just state this outright without the parentheses?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was supposed to be a nice night out//</span><br />You really gloss over this bar scene. It&#039;s not going to carry as much weight if we just see it summarized after the fact. Since it&#039;s the whole setup for what happens in the story, I&#039;d recommend spending a little time in there with them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity had fallen into a bit of a slump, and had hit the bottle hard//</span><br />There&#039;s a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. You don&#039;t need one here, since it&#039;s a single clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy babbled in panic, as she held Rarity’s limp body in her hooves.//</span><br />&quot;As&quot; clauses are a little trickier. With a comma, they tend to create a feel of &quot;because,&quot; and without, a feel of &quot;at the same time that.&quot; Also, I&#039;d rather see her act panicked than to have you tell me that&#039;s how she feels. There&#039;s an explanation in the section on show versus tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dimly-lit//</span><br />Compound modifiers don&#039;t take a hyphen if they&#039;re two-word phrases that start with an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that stallion, left with Sassaflash//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lamp post//</span><br />lamppost<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sweet metallic//</span><br />Repetitive with the way you described it before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tongue. as//</span><br />Incorrect punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy darted forward and licked at the blood, before pulling back in horror.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma. And don&#039;t tell me she&#039;s horrified. Show me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She watched as the two pinprick holes closed over, the only sign of their encounter was a faint stain of pink against the pale white-gray of Rarity’s coat.//</span><br />Comma splice. You used this exact &quot;two pinprick holes&quot; phrasing earlier in the same paragraph. And spelled it differently.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy babbled in panic//</span><br />Another phrasing you&#039;ve used before, word for word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy lifted her friend over her shoulders. and took flight.//</span><br />Extraneous punctuation. And the last time she lifted Rarity like this, it took an &quot;uncanny and unknown strength.&quot; It sounds rather routine here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carousel Boutique was not far from the park, and she flew with amazing speed.//</span><br />You&#039;ve been keeping the story in Fluttershy&#039;s perspective, so it&#039;s odd for her to make the &quot;amazing speed&quot; judgment about herself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyes did not match the flowing pink mane or her pale-gold coat//</span><br />Odd to characterize &quot;the&quot; mane, but &quot;her&quot; coat. One implies a distance, while the other doesn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It— It’s//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the first instance in a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“So-you’re-a-vampire-pony-and-you-attacked-one-of-your-best-friends-last-night”//</span><br />Use either the quotes or the hyphens. You don&#039;t need both.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity sat on a chair, still a little woozy from blood loss.//</span><br />She was perfectly fine in the previous scene. And Fluttershy was never described as drinking much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;H-How//</span><br />Capitalization<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville Express//</span><br />Underline or (preferably) italicize the name of a newspaper.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Celestia has always denied requests from reporters to allow interviews with the so-called saviors of Equestria.//</span><br />Why would Celestia be acting as their press agent?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;again…” Rarity’s blush intensified; her cheeks nearly outshone Twilight’s light spell. “…i-if//</span><br />You look like you&#039;re trying to put a narrative aside in the quote. Here&#039;s how:<br />again—” Rarity’s blush intensified; her cheeks nearly outshone Twilight’s light spell “—i-if<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Ya heard Twi; ya need to replenish yer blood, and it ain’t gunna help if it’s all in yer face!”//</span><br />Don&#039;t overwrite her accent. The reader already knows what she sounds like, and you don&#039;t want to make it more difficult to read. Getting her voice right is more about word choice and phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Dibs being fed on next!”//</span><br />Italics are preferred over bold or all caps for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Celestia frowned at the newspapers laying before her.//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville Express//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Manehattan Journal//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Vanhoover Daily//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hive Today//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Appleloosan Gazette//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlot Times//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlot Digest//</span><br />Italicize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“welcomed our new vampony overlords.”//</span><br />This is inconsistent with the way you&#039;ve formatted the other newspaper quotes. This way is actually preferable. There&#039;s no reason to italicize them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna chuckled as she entered the room.//</span><br />You&#039;ve been using a lot of questionable speaking verbs. This one in particular turns up frequently. You don&#039;t want your choice of speaking verbs to stand out more than the speech itself. There&#039;s a rationale given in the section on saidisms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Twas//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, as has happened here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh, Tia… you’re no fun anymore.”//</span><br />Why does she suddenly drop the formal language here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Affection and pranking in one.//</span><br />This seems more from Luna&#039;s perspective, but the scene has been with Celestia&#039;s until now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia shrieked, as Luna nuzzled her sister, wiping some of the smelly timberwolf ichor into her cheek.//</span><br />Misplaced modifier. &quot;Wiping…&quot; will tend to modify the nearest prior object. If it had been an inanimate object, I could apply a little logi and sort it out, but this is truly ambiguous. Grammatically speaking, Celestia performs this action, but I bet you meant for Luna to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;WHAT USURPER WOULDST//</span><br />The conjugation is just &quot;would&quot; for third person.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“And you did not think to inform Us?”//</span><br />So she capitalizes the pronoun for herself but not for Celestia?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘tis//</span><br />Another backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ceased.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That is a word. Not really a likeable nor dislikeable word. Just a word. No matter.//</span><br />Either you&#039;re saying that Fluttershy would actually think this with all the activity happening outside or your narrator is getting awfully meta. Neither one is a good thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;throng//</span><br />You just used that word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;THY SUBJECTS//</span><br />Whom is she addressing? They&#039;re her subjects, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What she saw outside made her practically crap herself.//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t seem like something Fluttershy would say.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Strapped to her back was the most intimidating crossbow Fluttershy had ever seen.//</span><br />These sentences have an incredibly repetitive structure. And given a crossbow&#039;s reload time, they&#039;re only briefly intimidating.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘tis//</span><br />Backward apostrophe. There are more of these. You&#039;ll have to find them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the powerful buck of the princess//</span><br />These indirect possessions are often clunky. If you phrase it as &quot;the princess&#039;s powerful buck,&quot; it loses nothing and is more direct and concise.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna stepped through, barricading the door behind her.//</span><br />Another danger of participles: they synchronize actions. You&#039;re saying these happen at the same time, when it&#039;s more logical to have one happen after the other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leathery wings//</span><br />you just said this one sentence ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;do thee//</span><br />dost thou<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You’re a vampire, Fluttershy, a creature of the night, like myself and many others.//</span><br />Why is she dropping the formal speech again?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thou hath//</span><br />hast<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not//</span><br />Swap these.<br /><br />I guess this means Luna is a vampire? That brings up some points that are never explained. Does Celestia know? If not, shouldn&#039;t Luna swear Fluttershy to secrecy? And if Celestia does know, she probably has for a long time, and could have gradually introduced the idea to the public. I just kind of have to accept this without explanation.<br /><br />That said, this wasn&#039;t a bad story at all. A lot of niggling mechanical things and some spots of unapt telling, but nothing too daunting.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 253

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>raise Rising//

This sounds a bit clumsy just because of the repetition. It lends an almost comic quality to the sentence which isn't really warranted. You could rephrase it as "care for Rising" or some such.

>Both pairs of wings traced out contrails as they squeezed the water from the air//

I appreciate that you're trying to be poetic here and that this unicorn quite possibly dosen't know any better, but this happens precisely for the opposite reason. Condensation forms because of low-pressure areas of the wing, where the local static temperature drops below the dewpoint (yes, my day job is as an aerodynamicist).

>Still, it was almost a boring fight to me; no matter how pretty it looked, I knew how it was going to end.//

You've used all these semicolons correctly, but I have to question the number of them. There are three things to consider. 1) Are they turning up often enough that their mere existence calls attention to itself and distracts from the story? In my opinion, it's getting there. 2) Is it plausible for the type of narration or dialogue? An omniscient viewpoint can use them pretty effectively, but a very limited or a first-person viewpoint will tend to be more stream of consciousness, so semicolons may be a poor fit. This is related to: 3) Is this character the type of person who would express himself with such formalism and know the finer points of grammar? I don't know enough about him yet to say, but given his occupation, it wouldn't seem to be one that requires a high level of education.

>briefly lived//

Awkward phrasing. I'd go with short-lived.

>wump//

It's preferred to keep sound effects out of narration for more serious writing. Just describe the sound.

>I do want to test myself against her.//

Perhaps add emphasis to "myself"? Otherwise, he seems a little to blase about it. I'd like to see a little more emotion from him about it. Is he acting vengeful? Impressed? Eager?

>Ice ran through my veins//

This is the only sens I get of his emotion. He's stating a lot of things factually here, and it would lend more credence if the phrasing and cadence of the narration and the physical symptoms he experiences reflected his emotional state. The former isn't always necessary, depending on narrative choice, but it's a good idea for first-person.

>let out a breath I hadn’t realized I’d been holding//

This is incredibly cliched.

>She tucked her wings tucked//

Repetition.

>As she approached the water, she made no effort to slow, only letting her magic trail out behind her, spooling out like streamers in the wind.//

It's a bit clunky to have two participial phrases in series like this.

>Celestia//

He uses this as invective often enough that it's standing out to me. It's getting distracting.

At this point, my Mary Sue siren is going off. Squall can just do no wrong. Great mother, apparently a great teacher, unassailable in contests. You've lost my sympathies for her. I'd encourage you to have one or both of these victories be difficult. She didn't really even have to try.

>I turned back to them and saw Gertrude tending to her husband, working some of the cramps out of his wings while he grimaced.//

Here's another danger of stacking up participles (and of participles in general): it's easy to make them misplaced modifiers. It's not obvious whether they're nested, i.e., whether "working…" refers to "husband" (this is the grammatical default) or "Gertrude."

>As I walked up to the//

Typo or missing word.

>Mine daughter//

Is this just his ignorance of English cases? Or is this an imitation of the German "mein"? Because if the latter, wouldn't ha also use the forms appropriate to the gender of the noun that follows (meine, in this case)?

>the coats of pegasi coats//

Repetition. And if you end up keeping the latter one, noun adjuncts are singular.

>to pretty effectively repel water except for their own tears//

Why would this be the case, and by what mechanism would it work? Tears are just slightly salty, so are their coats only effective against fresh water, not salt or brackish?

>She nodded and covered my hoof with hers, nuzzling it.//

How is she nuzzling it if it's covered?

>about the other species//

Given that he's using this in the plural, it would be clearer to eliminate "the."

>He actually had made it better, though.//

Maybe emphasize"had"? And watch the "to be" verbs. I didn't notice a ton in the first chapter, but there are six in this paragraph alone. They bring action to a standstill and are boring to read. You should be choosing more active verbs where possible. Then you have five more in the next paragraph. Okay, I'll go ahead and run the count. Of the easier to search forms, I found 77 in this chapter, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen.

>No— I//

Either put space on both sides of a dash or neither. Don't just put space on one side.

>Rising was nine.//

Ah. Mary Sue runs in the family?

>magical bond of parental bond//

Repetitive.

>gangplank//

How big is this ship, and what is its mission? This wouldn't be conducive to loading cargo, for example, unless that will all be handled via crane. But if there's much manual carrying of cargo aboard, they'd probably use something larger, like a brow.

>watching as the the unicorns magicked the mooring lines off the bollards//

A bollard is typically something on the pier, not a ship. So the crew is remotely casting off shore lines from the ship? That's not standard procedure. Line handlers from shore would normally do that, under the port authority, and there may even be a harbor pilot brought aboard to steer the ship out past the breakwater. (Yes, that's also my day job. I'm an aerodynamicist for the Navy.)

>who I could fly with//

Whom. Your call on whether she knows that, since it's in her voice.

>She looked over at him as we continued down the street.//

That's pretty bland. She doesn't even know him yet. Surely she has some sort of reaction.

>She looked back and up at me.//

Same thing again.

>Maybe she thought it was a strange question since I was walking too.//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>vould//

You hadn't been doing the w/v switch in her parents' speech, so why hers?

>I guess my confusion must have shown because she started to elaborate.//

Missing comma.

>I pointed to the door at the far end of it as we walked it.//

Missing word.

>missis Line//

It's akin to a title when used as part of her name like this. Capitalize.

>After placing her saddlebags under the bed//

Would a griffon call them saddlebags? Presumably, they don't wear saddles.

>little Star’s high little//

Repetition.

>Though,//

There's no reason to have a comma there.

>When I asked her fly a bit for me//

Missing word.

>soar high above the city. Putting Gabriella through her paces showed me her ability to soar//

Repetition.

>looked around for a moment//

This is already the 18th (and thankfully last) instance of "look" in the chapter.

>but she can pull lightning from empty air better than I can//

Verb tense.

>She says she’s not very good for a griffon, though.//

Again, why the shift to present tense?

>before I it was time to make them supper.//

Extraneous word.

>they compared when they Guiding got back//

Extraneous word.

>That was just awful. Worse, I knew it wasn’t just something//

"Just" is an easy word to lose track of and overuse. Close repetition of it here.

>Though, I couldn’t imagine my little colt doing anything to get that reaction.//

Again, no comma. It's rare for one after a conjunction to be used correctly.

>Celestia-damned//

This implies that she has (or is suspected to have) the ability and inclination to actually do so, which is a rather disturbing prospect. Adapting Earth expressions isn't always a good idea.

There are a few overall problems here. First off, much of the emotional content is bland. You have a first-person narrator, so you're in an ideal position for the narration itself to carry the emotion through the tone, word choice, and cadence, and yet much of it feels more like a bland listing of event after event. For that matter, the entirety of chapter 4 is narrated. We don't get to see any of the interactions. Squall would have to summarize things she didn't witness, but there's plenty of times she's there, and yet we hear that she had such and such a conversation without ever getting the dialogue. This chapter really dragged. Another issue with the narrative is that it's sometimes at odds with the characters. A first-person narrator is the character and so needs to sound like him, but I remarked at one or two points that the narrator was using formal structures and word choices that didn't seem plausible for the character. You use quite a few "to be" verbs. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 102 in the fourth chapter alone, which is a rate of more than once every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens not what merely is. You need to be choosing more active verbs.

The other biggie is that Squall Line and Rising Star both come across as blatant Mary Sues. Guiding Light has no doubt that Squall will win against the female griffon and sure enough, she does. Quite easily. She even feels bad about it later, so she also gets to take the moral high ground. Then she also beats the male griffon at his own game, which she's never played before. No matter. He's gone in one shot, and she's none the worse for wear. Then the son is charismatic (at least some of his friends abandon him when he sides with Gabriella), very advanced in magic for his age, not just generally, but able to cast spells that have never been seen before, and he's the smartest kid in his class. They're both so implausibly perfect that you've lost any rooting interest I might have in them.

Also note that it's pretty cliched to have a rhetorical question in your synopsis.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;raise Rising//</span><br />This sounds a bit clumsy just because of the repetition. It lends an almost comic quality to the sentence which isn&#039;t really warranted. You could rephrase it as &quot;care for Rising&quot; or some such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Both pairs of wings traced out contrails as they squeezed the water from the air//</span><br />I appreciate that you&#039;re trying to be poetic here and that this unicorn quite possibly dosen&#039;t know any better, but this happens precisely for the opposite reason. Condensation forms because of low-pressure areas of the wing, where the local static temperature drops below the dewpoint (yes, my day job is as an aerodynamicist).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Still, it was almost a boring fight to me; no matter how pretty it looked, I knew how it was going to end.//</span><br />You&#039;ve used all these semicolons correctly, but I have to question the number of them. There are three things to consider. 1) Are they turning up often enough that their mere existence calls attention to itself and distracts from the story? In my opinion, it&#039;s getting there. 2) Is it plausible for the type of narration or dialogue? An omniscient viewpoint can use them pretty effectively, but a very limited or a first-person viewpoint will tend to be more stream of consciousness, so semicolons may be a poor fit. This is related to: 3) Is this character the type of person who would express himself with such formalism and know the finer points of grammar? I don&#039;t know enough about him yet to say, but given his occupation, it wouldn&#039;t seem to be one that requires a high level of education.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;briefly lived//</span><br />Awkward phrasing. I&#039;d go with short-lived.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>wump</i>//</span><br />It&#039;s preferred to keep sound effects out of narration for more serious writing. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I do want to test myself against her.//</span><br />Perhaps add emphasis to &quot;myself&quot;? Otherwise, he seems a little to blase about it. I&#039;d like to see a little more emotion from him about it. Is he acting vengeful? Impressed? Eager?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ice ran through my veins//</span><br />This is the only sens I get of his emotion. He&#039;s stating a lot of things factually here, and it would lend more credence if the phrasing and cadence of the narration and the physical symptoms he experiences reflected his emotional state. The former isn&#039;t always necessary, depending on narrative choice, but it&#039;s a good idea for first-person.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;let out a breath I hadn’t realized I’d been holding//</span><br />This is incredibly cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She tucked her wings tucked//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she approached the water, she made no effort to slow, only letting her magic trail out behind her, spooling out like streamers in the wind.//</span><br />It&#039;s a bit clunky to have two participial phrases in series like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia//</span><br />He uses this as invective often enough that it&#039;s standing out to me. It&#039;s getting distracting.<br /><br />At this point, my Mary Sue siren is going off. Squall can just do no wrong. Great mother, apparently a great teacher, unassailable in contests. You&#039;ve lost my sympathies for her. I&#039;d encourage you to have one or both of these victories be difficult. She didn&#039;t really even have to try.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I turned back to them and saw Gertrude tending to her husband, working some of the cramps out of his wings while he grimaced.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another danger of stacking up participles (and of participles in general): it&#039;s easy to make them misplaced modifiers. It&#039;s not obvious whether they&#039;re nested, i.e., whether &quot;working…&quot; refers to &quot;husband&quot; (this is the grammatical default) or &quot;Gertrude.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As I walked up to the//</span><br />Typo or missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mine daughter//</span><br />Is this just his ignorance of English cases? Or is this an imitation of the German &quot;mein&quot;? Because if the latter, wouldn&#039;t ha also use the forms appropriate to the gender of the noun that follows (meine, in this case)?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the coats of pegasi coats//</span><br />Repetition. And if you end up keeping the latter one, noun adjuncts are singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to pretty effectively repel water except for their own tears//</span><br />Why would this be the case, and by what mechanism would it work? Tears are just slightly salty, so are their coats only effective against fresh water, not salt or brackish?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She nodded and covered my hoof with hers, nuzzling it.//</span><br />How is she nuzzling it if it&#039;s covered?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;about the other species//</span><br />Given that he&#039;s using this in the plural, it would be clearer to eliminate &quot;the.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He actually had made it better, though.//</span><br />Maybe emphasize&quot;had&quot;? And watch the &quot;to be&quot; verbs. I didn&#039;t notice a ton in the first chapter, but there are six in this paragraph alone. They bring action to a standstill and are boring to read. You should be choosing more active verbs where possible. Then you have five more in the next paragraph. Okay, I&#039;ll go ahead and run the count. Of the easier to search forms, I found 77 in this chapter, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No— I//</span><br />Either put space on both sides of a dash or neither. Don&#039;t just put space on one side.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rising was nine.//</span><br />Ah. Mary Sue runs in the family?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;magical bond of parental bond//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gangplank//</span><br />How big is this ship, and what is its mission? This wouldn&#039;t be conducive to loading cargo, for example, unless that will all be handled via crane. But if there&#039;s much manual carrying of cargo aboard, they&#039;d probably use something larger, like a brow.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;watching as the the unicorns magicked the mooring lines off the bollards//</span><br />A bollard is typically something on the pier, not a ship. So the crew is remotely casting off shore lines from the ship? That&#039;s not standard procedure. Line handlers from shore would normally do that, under the port authority, and there may even be a harbor pilot brought aboard to steer the ship out past the breakwater. (Yes, that&#039;s also my day job. I&#039;m an aerodynamicist for the Navy.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who I could fly with//</span><br />Whom. Your call on whether she knows that, since it&#039;s in her voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked over at him as we continued down the street.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty bland. She doesn&#039;t even know him yet. Surely she has some sort of reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked back and up at me.//</span><br />Same thing again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maybe she thought it was a strange question since I was walking too.//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;vould//</span><br />You hadn&#039;t been doing the w/v switch in her parents&#039; speech, so why hers?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I guess my confusion must have shown because she started to elaborate.//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I pointed to the door at the far end of it as we walked it.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;missis Line//</span><br />It&#039;s akin to a title when used as part of her name like this. Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After placing her saddlebags under the bed//</span><br />Would a griffon call them saddlebags? Presumably, they don&#039;t wear saddles.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little Star’s high little//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Though,//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason to have a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I asked her fly a bit for me//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;soar high above the city. Putting Gabriella through her paces showed me her ability to soar//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked around for a moment//</span><br />This is already the 18th (and thankfully last) instance of &quot;look&quot; in the chapter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but she can pull lightning from empty air better than I can//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She says she’s not very good for a griffon, though.//</span><br />Again, why the shift to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;before I it was time to make them supper.//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they compared when they Guiding got back//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That was just awful. Worse, I knew it wasn’t just something//</span><br />&quot;Just&quot; is an easy word to lose track of and overuse. Close repetition of it here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Though, I couldn’t imagine my little colt doing anything to get that reaction.//</span><br />Again, no comma. It&#039;s rare for one after a conjunction to be used correctly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia-damned//</span><br />This implies that she has (or is suspected to have) the ability and inclination to actually do so, which is a rather disturbing prospect. Adapting Earth expressions isn&#039;t always a good idea.<br /><br />There are a few overall problems here. First off, much of the emotional content is bland. You have a first-person narrator, so you&#039;re in an ideal position for the narration itself to carry the emotion through the tone, word choice, and cadence, and yet much of it feels more like a bland listing of event after event. For that matter, the entirety of chapter 4 is narrated. We don&#039;t get to see any of the interactions. Squall would have to summarize things she didn&#039;t witness, but there&#039;s plenty of times she&#039;s there, and yet we hear that she had such and such a conversation without ever getting the dialogue. This chapter really dragged. Another issue with the narrative is that it&#039;s sometimes at odds with the characters. A first-person narrator is the character and so needs to sound like him, but I remarked at one or two points that the narrator was using formal structures and word choices that didn&#039;t seem plausible for the character. You use quite a few &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 102 in the fourth chapter alone, which is a rate of more than once every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens not what merely is. You need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br />The other biggie is that Squall Line and Rising Star both come across as blatant Mary Sues. Guiding Light has no doubt that Squall will win against the female griffon and sure enough, she does. Quite easily. She even feels bad about it later, so she also gets to take the moral high ground. Then she also beats the male griffon at his own game, which she&#039;s never played before. No matter. He&#039;s gone in one shot, and she&#039;s none the worse for wear. Then the son is charismatic (at least some of his friends abandon him when he sides with Gabriella), very advanced in magic for his age, not just generally, but able to cast spells that have never been seen before, and he&#039;s the smartest kid in his class. They&#039;re both so implausibly perfect that you&#039;ve lost any rooting interest I might have in them.<br /><br />Also note that it&#039;s pretty cliched to have a rhetorical question in your synopsis.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 254

>>130937
I addressed your points about extraneous or missing words. Expectedly, they were all in places where I had changed my mind on how to structure the sentence.

"I appreciate that you're trying to be poetic here and that this unicorn quite possibly dosen't know any better, but this happens precisely for the opposite reason. Condensation forms because of low-pressure areas of the wing, where the local static temperature drops below the dewpoint (yes, my day job is as an aerodynamicist)."

Like you guessed, it's Guiding's lack of understanding. However, because I am also very interested in aeronautics, I'll change the verb to "pulled," which is closer to the actual phenomenon and wouldn't be outside the realm of possible words he would use to describe it.

"You've used all these semicolons correctly, but I have to question the number of them. There are three things to consider. 1) Are they turning up often enough that their mere existence calls attention to itself and distracts from the story? In my opinion, it's getting there. 2) Is it plausible for the type of narration or dialogue? An omniscient viewpoint can use them pretty effectively, but a very limited or a first-person viewpoint will tend to be more stream of consciousness, so semicolons may be a poor fit. This is related to: 3) Is this character the type of person who would express himself with such formalism and know the finer points of grammar? I don't know enough about him yet to say, but given his occupation, it wouldn't seem to be one that requires a high level of education."

On your first and second points, I disagree. If I were to punctuate how people actual people talk and (speaking for myself) think, I firmly believe that semicolons would appear often. In my experience, thoughts usually connect to each other highly enough to warrant semicolons. When I write, I make sure to use full stops more often than I would prefer. I don't know if it is only to semicolons you refer with your third point.

">As she approached the water, she made no effort to slow, only letting her magic trail out behind her, spooling out like streamers in the wind.//
It's a bit clunky to have two participial phrases in series like this."

I disagree, but I changed it anyway. I prefer to save on words when possible, and through the attention you called to this sentence, I gave it enough thought to shorten it a bit. It now reads:

As she approached the water, she made no effort to slow, only letting her magic spool out behind her like streamers in the wind.

">I turned back to them and saw Gertrude tending to her husband, working some of the cramps out of his wings while he grimaced.//
Here's another danger of stacking up participles (and of participles in general): it's easy to make them misplaced modifiers. It's not obvious whether they're nested, i.e., whether "working…" refers to "husband" (this is the grammatical default) or "Gertrude."

I fixed this.

I turned back to them and saw Gertrude working some of the cramps out of her husband's wings while he grimaced."

"Is this just his ignorance of English cases? Or is this an imitation of the German "mein"? Because if the latter, wouldn't ha also use the forms appropriate to the gender of the noun that follows (meine, in this case)?"

It's the former. Were it the latter, I would have it in italics, as is standard for foreign words.

">to pretty effectively repel water except for their own tears//
Why would this be the case, and by what mechanism would it work? Tears are just slightly salty, so are their coats only effective against fresh water, not salt or brackish?"

I answer this in the following sentence. Rather, I give a half answer, as Guiding cuts off a full explanation because he cares more about his wife than the phenomena and he doesn't fully understand it himself. I could have gone off on a long world-building spiel, but I felt doing so would harm the scene's tone.

"How is she nuzzling [Guiding's hoof] if it's covered?"

"Smiling, I rested a hoof on her cheek. “I just want you to be happy. Will you be, doing this?”

She nodded and covered my hoof with hers, nuzzling it."

It's easily done because his hoof was already on her cheek.

">watching as the the unicorns magicked the mooring lines off the bollards//
A bollard is typically something on the pier, not a ship. So the crew is remotely casting off shore lines from the ship? That's not standard procedure."

Not here, it's not. However, with unicorns, who have ranged telekinesis, they can and do "remotely [cast] off shore lines from the ship." It's not an issue for them to do so. While I appreciate you sharing your expertise, and I may even find a way to slip some of it into the fifth chapter, not all knowledge from Earth is transferable.

"You hadn't been doing the w/v switch in her parents' speech, so why hers?"

It's mainly for reasons of readability. In places where I felt that such a switch would make it awkward, usually with short words, I avoided it.

">No— I//
Either put space on both sides of a dash or neither. Don't just put space on one side."

I'm keeping this because it's cutting off one sentence, which would typically have no space before it. I thought over this particular bit of punctuation for a while before posting the chapter and came to the conclusion that I would need to change my other spaced dashes to the EN variety if I didn't want to have this be determined solely through context. Given that I use spaced EMs in all of my stories (and everywhere, really), I felt that changing all of them for something that occurs so rarely wasn't worth it.

"How big is this ship, and what is its mission? This wouldn't be conducive to loading cargo, for example, unless that will all be handled via crane. But if there's much manual carrying of cargo aboard, they'd probably use something larger, like a brow."

Again, I'm taking the path of magic — particularly that of the pegasus variety — allowing them to do things in ways not entirely similar to here.

"Would a griffon call them saddlebags? Presumably, they don't wear saddles."

Griffons would likely call them satchels or bags, However, a pony who is commenting on them would call them what she is used to calling them.

"[Celestia-damned] implies that she has (or is suspected to have) the ability and inclination to actually do so, which is a rather disturbing prospect. Adapting Earth expressions isn't always a good idea."

She banished her sister to the moon, and she has had monsters thrown into Tartarus. If the former doesn't fit closely enough to the definition for you, the latter still should.

"For that matter, the entirety of chapter 4 is narrated. We don't get to see any of the interactions."

That was done very deliberately. Without doing so, the story would have derailed from what it was intended to be about: how Rising's parents impact his life. Also, the story would drag on far too long; I had to cover more than a month of Guiding's trip to get to the next (obvious) plot point. What happens in chapter four is a story unto itself, and I want to eventually do it full justice, but in this story, it's not the time or place.

"You use quite a few "to be" verbs. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 102 in the fourth chapter alone, which is a rate of more than once every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens not what merely is. You need to be choosing more active verbs."

What you did there, in those last two sentences, I see it. That was well played, and I commend you for it.

That out of the way, I agree. When I edit for others, I point out the same thing. After all, using "to be" is usually what makes passively constructed sentences boring. I'll work on avoiding this in my prose.

"Then she also beats the male griffon at his own game, which she's never played before. No matter. He's gone in one shot, and she's none the worse for wear."

If someone challenged a professional bodybuilder to an arm wrestling match, even if that person was very well conditioned, the challenger would be expected to lose. This is a similar situation, the difference being that aptitude with lightning is not so easily seen as bulging muscles are. The match is supposed to be akin to bloody knuckles; both sides are expected to be able to take multiple hits from lightning before one gives up. This is typically done between griffons, though. I see their attacks as less powerful but far faster than those of pegasi. Squall's attack took far longer to build than Gregor's, which makes it unsuitable for an actual fight.

"able to cast spells that have never been seen before"

Oh, it has been seen before, and it's not even a difficult spell, really. It's just not commonly used, so Squall isn't familiar with it. Mostly, this sort of spell is used in magic classes for the pegasi and earth ponies who have an interest in higher education and how their world works. Squall doesn't fit into this group.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130937" onclick="return highlight('130937', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130937">&gt;&gt;130937</a><br />I addressed your points about extraneous or missing words. Expectedly, they were all in places where I had changed my mind on how to structure the sentence.<br /><br />&quot;I appreciate that you&#039;re trying to be poetic here and that this unicorn quite possibly dosen&#039;t know any better, but this happens precisely for the opposite reason. Condensation forms because of low-pressure areas of the wing, where the local static temperature drops below the dewpoint (yes, my day job is as an aerodynamicist).&quot;<br /><br />Like you guessed, it&#039;s Guiding&#039;s lack of understanding. However, because I am also very interested in aeronautics, I&#039;ll change the verb to &quot;pulled,&quot; which is closer to the actual phenomenon and wouldn&#039;t be outside the realm of possible words he would use to describe it.<br /><br />&quot;You&#039;ve used all these semicolons correctly, but I have to question the number of them. There are three things to consider. 1) Are they turning up often enough that their mere existence calls attention to itself and distracts from the story? In my opinion, it&#039;s getting there. 2) Is it plausible for the type of narration or dialogue? An omniscient viewpoint can use them pretty effectively, but a very limited or a first-person viewpoint will tend to be more stream of consciousness, so semicolons may be a poor fit. This is related to: 3) Is this character the type of person who would express himself with such formalism and know the finer points of grammar? I don&#039;t know enough about him yet to say, but given his occupation, it wouldn&#039;t seem to be one that requires a high level of education.&quot;<br /><br />On your first and second points, I disagree. If I were to punctuate how people actual people talk and (speaking for myself) think, I firmly believe that semicolons would appear often. In my experience, thoughts usually connect to each other highly enough to warrant semicolons. When I write, I make sure to use full stops more often than I would prefer. I don&#039;t know if it is only to semicolons you refer with your third point.<br /><br />&quot;&gt;As she approached the water, she made no effort to slow, only letting her magic trail out behind her, spooling out like streamers in the wind.//<br />It&#039;s a bit clunky to have two participial phrases in series like this.&quot;<br /><br />I disagree, but I changed it anyway. I prefer to save on words when possible, and through the attention you called to this sentence, I gave it enough thought to shorten it a bit. It now reads:<br /><br />As she approached the water, she made no effort to slow, only letting her magic spool out behind her like streamers in the wind.<br /><br />&quot;&gt;I turned back to them and saw Gertrude tending to her husband, working some of the cramps out of his wings while he grimaced.//<br />Here&#039;s another danger of stacking up participles (and of participles in general): it&#039;s easy to make them misplaced modifiers. It&#039;s not obvious whether they&#039;re nested, i.e., whether &quot;working…&quot; refers to &quot;husband&quot; (this is the grammatical default) or &quot;Gertrude.&quot;<br /><br />I fixed this.<br /><br />I turned back to them and saw Gertrude working some of the cramps out of her husband&#039;s wings while he grimaced.&quot;<br /><br />&quot;Is this just his ignorance of English cases? Or is this an imitation of the German &quot;mein&quot;? Because if the latter, wouldn&#039;t ha also use the forms appropriate to the gender of the noun that follows (meine, in this case)?&quot;<br /><br />It&#039;s the former. Were it the latter, I would have it in italics, as is standard for foreign words.<br /><br />&quot;&gt;to pretty effectively repel water except for their own tears//<br />Why would this be the case, and by what mechanism would it work? Tears are just slightly salty, so are their coats only effective against fresh water, not salt or brackish?&quot;<br /><br />I answer this in the following sentence. Rather, I give a half answer, as Guiding cuts off a full explanation because he cares more about his wife than the phenomena and he doesn&#039;t fully understand it himself. I could have gone off on a long world-building spiel, but I felt doing so would harm the scene&#039;s tone.<br /><br />&quot;How is she nuzzling [Guiding&#039;s hoof] if it&#039;s covered?&quot;<br /><br />&quot;Smiling, I rested a hoof on her cheek. “I just want you to be happy. Will you be, doing this?”<br /><br />She nodded and covered my hoof with hers, nuzzling it.&quot;<br /><br />It&#039;s easily done because his hoof was already on her cheek.<br /><br />&quot;&gt;watching as the the unicorns magicked the mooring lines off the bollards//<br />A bollard is typically something on the pier, not a ship. So the crew is remotely casting off shore lines from the ship? That&#039;s not standard procedure.&quot;<br /><br />Not here, it&#039;s not. However, with unicorns, who have ranged telekinesis, they can and do &quot;remotely [cast] off shore lines from the ship.&quot; It&#039;s not an issue for them to do so. While I appreciate you sharing your expertise, and I may even find a way to slip some of it into the fifth chapter, not all knowledge from Earth is transferable.<br /><br />&quot;You hadn&#039;t been doing the w/v switch in her parents&#039; speech, so why hers?&quot;<br /><br />It&#039;s mainly for reasons of readability. In places where I felt that such a switch would make it awkward, usually with short words, I avoided it.<br /><br />&quot;&gt;No— I//<br />Either put space on both sides of a dash or neither. Don&#039;t just put space on one side.&quot;<br /><br />I&#039;m keeping this because it&#039;s cutting off one sentence, which would typically have no space before it. I thought over this particular bit of punctuation for a while before posting the chapter and came to the conclusion that I would need to change my other spaced dashes to the EN variety if I didn&#039;t want to have this be determined solely through context. Given that I use spaced EMs in all of my stories (and everywhere, really), I felt that changing all of them for something that occurs so rarely wasn&#039;t worth it.<br /><br />&quot;How big is this ship, and what is its mission? This wouldn&#039;t be conducive to loading cargo, for example, unless that will all be handled via crane. But if there&#039;s much manual carrying of cargo aboard, they&#039;d probably use something larger, like a brow.&quot;<br /><br />Again, I&#039;m taking the path of magic — particularly that of the pegasus variety — allowing them to do things in ways not entirely similar to here.<br /><br />&quot;Would a griffon call them saddlebags? Presumably, they don&#039;t wear saddles.&quot;<br /><br />Griffons would likely call them satchels or bags, However, a pony who is commenting on them would call them what she is used to calling them.<br /><br />&quot;[Celestia-damned] implies that she has (or is suspected to have) the ability and inclination to actually do so, which is a rather disturbing prospect. Adapting Earth expressions isn&#039;t always a good idea.&quot;<br /><br />She banished her sister to the moon, and she has had monsters thrown into Tartarus. If the former doesn&#039;t fit closely enough to the definition for you, the latter still should.<br /><br />&quot;For that matter, the entirety of chapter 4 is narrated. We don&#039;t get to see any of the interactions.&quot;<br /><br />That was done very deliberately. Without doing so, the story would have derailed from what it was intended to be about: how Rising&#039;s parents impact his life. Also, the story would drag on far too long; I had to cover more than a month of Guiding&#039;s trip to get to the next (obvious) plot point. What happens in chapter four is a story unto itself, and I want to eventually do it full justice, but in this story, it&#039;s not the time or place.<br /><br />&quot;You use quite a few &quot;to be&quot; verbs. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 102 in the fourth chapter alone, which is a rate of more than once every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens not what merely is. You need to be choosing more active verbs.&quot;<br /><br />What you did there, in those last two sentences, I see it. That was well played, and I commend you for it.<br /><br />That out of the way, I agree. When I edit for others, I point out the same thing. After all, using &quot;to be&quot; is usually what makes passively constructed sentences boring. I&#039;ll work on avoiding this in my prose.<br /><br />&quot;Then she also beats the male griffon at his own game, which she&#039;s never played before. No matter. He&#039;s gone in one shot, and she&#039;s none the worse for wear.&quot;<br /><br />If someone challenged a professional bodybuilder to an arm wrestling match, even if that person was very well conditioned, the challenger would be expected to lose. This is a similar situation, the difference being that aptitude with lightning is not so easily seen as bulging muscles are. The match is supposed to be akin to bloody knuckles; both sides are expected to be able to take multiple hits from lightning before one gives up. This is typically done between griffons, though. I see their attacks as less powerful but far faster than those of pegasi. Squall&#039;s attack took far longer to build than Gregor&#039;s, which makes it unsuitable for an actual fight.<br /><br />&quot;able to cast spells that have never been seen before&quot;<br /><br />Oh, it has been seen before, and it&#039;s not even a difficult spell, really. It&#039;s just not commonly used, so Squall isn&#039;t familiar with it. Mostly, this sort of spell is used in magic classes for the pegasi and earth ponies who have an interest in higher education and how their world works. Squall doesn&#039;t fit into this group.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 255

>>130941
>If I were to punctuate how people actual people talk and (speaking for myself) think, I firmly believe that semicolons would appear often.
You'll find yourself very much in the minority on this one. Semicolons are quite formal, while streams of thought change direction on a whim. It's much more common to see this type of cadence rendered through dashes, ellipses, and fragments.

>I disagree, but I changed it anyway.

Stacking participles makes sentences ramble and leads to misplaced modifiers. You can use them if you like, but any good reviewer will call you on it.

>Were it the latter, I would have it in italics, as is standard for foreign words.

Not necessarily, depending on usage. In your case, you're using a lot of imitative spellings, and it would be distracting to alternate between the two. If someone spoke an entire paragraph in a foreign language, you wouldn't italicize it, or if someone was speaking pidgin English, you wouldn't italicize every other word.

>It's easily done because his hoof was already on her cheek.

It's still misleading. The idea is to achieve clarity.

>Not here, it's not. However, with unicorns, who have ranged telekinesis, they can and do "remotely [cast] off shore lines from the ship." It's not an issue for them to do so. While I appreciate you sharing your expertise, and I may even find a way to slip some of it into the fifth chapter, not all knowledge from Earth is transferable.

The issue wasn't whether it would be feasible for unicorns. The issue is that the port authority doesn't want the ship's hands doing this themselves, because there's no way they know how skilled the workers are and for liability reasons. If he owned the pier, it'd be a different matter.

>I'm keeping this because it's cutting off one sentence, which would typically have no space before it.

It doesn't matter whether a new sentence is starting. You still either leave a space on both sides or run both words against the dash. All of the pre-readers will call you on this.

>Griffons would likely call them satchels or bags, However, a pony who is commenting on them would call them what she is used to calling them.

You've also made these ponies out to be familiar with griffons. Wouldn't this be something they'd know?

>She banished her sister to the moon, and she has had monsters thrown into Tartarus. If the former doesn't fit closely enough to the definition for you, the latter still should.

Banishment is a quite different thing than damnation. One only implies exclusion. The other also implies torment.

>That was done very deliberately.

Proceed at your own risk. It wouldn't take much to show a few of those anecdotes live. By keeping it all as narration, you risk making the chapter very boring and difficult to get through, which was the case for me. The chapters following such often show steep drop-offs in views. You're free to keep it this way if you like, but we've rejected a lot of stories for it.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130941" onclick="return highlight('130941', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130941">&gt;&gt;130941</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I were to punctuate how people actual people talk and (speaking for myself) think, I firmly believe that semicolons would appear often.</span><br />You&#039;ll find yourself very much in the minority on this one. Semicolons are quite formal, while streams of thought change direction on a whim. It&#039;s much more common to see this type of cadence rendered through dashes, ellipses, and fragments.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I disagree, but I changed it anyway.</span><br />Stacking participles makes sentences ramble and leads to misplaced modifiers. You can use them if you like, but any good reviewer will call you on it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Were it the latter, I would have it in italics, as is standard for foreign words.</span><br />Not necessarily, depending on usage. In your case, you&#039;re using a lot of imitative spellings, and it would be distracting to alternate between the two. If someone spoke an entire paragraph in a foreign language, you wouldn&#039;t italicize it, or if someone was speaking pidgin English, you wouldn&#039;t italicize every other word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s easily done because his hoof was already on her cheek.</span><br />It&#039;s still misleading. The idea is to achieve clarity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not here, it&#039;s not. However, with unicorns, who have ranged telekinesis, they can and do &quot;remotely [cast] off shore lines from the ship.&quot; It&#039;s not an issue for them to do so. While I appreciate you sharing your expertise, and I may even find a way to slip some of it into the fifth chapter, not all knowledge from Earth is transferable.</span><br />The issue wasn&#039;t whether it would be feasible for unicorns. The issue is that the port authority doesn&#039;t want the ship&#039;s hands doing this themselves, because there&#039;s no way they know how skilled the workers are and for liability reasons. If he owned the pier, it&#039;d be a different matter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m keeping this because it&#039;s cutting off one sentence, which would typically have no space before it.</span><br />It doesn&#039;t matter whether a new sentence is starting. You still either leave a space on both sides or run both words against the dash. All of the pre-readers will call you on this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Griffons would likely call them satchels or bags, However, a pony who is commenting on them would call them what she is used to calling them.</span><br />You&#039;ve also made these ponies out to be familiar with griffons. Wouldn&#039;t this be something they&#039;d know?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She banished her sister to the moon, and she has had monsters thrown into Tartarus. If the former doesn&#039;t fit closely enough to the definition for you, the latter still should.</span><br />Banishment is a quite different thing than damnation. One only implies exclusion. The other also implies torment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That was done very deliberately.</span><br />Proceed at your own risk. It wouldn&#039;t take much to show a few of those anecdotes live. By keeping it all as narration, you risk making the chapter very boring and difficult to get through, which was the case for me. The chapters following such often show steep drop-offs in views. You&#039;re free to keep it this way if you like, but we&#039;ve rejected a lot of stories for it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 256

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Four of the six sentences in the third paragraph begin with "the," and understandably enough, the subject. In fact, all six sentences start with the subject. It's a fine thing to get across boredom and routine to the reader without making the story boring, so be very careful.

>minutia//

You're using it for a plural reference, so "minutiae."

>if I put it off//

Needs a comma after the dependent clause.

>Even now she was letting her mind think ahead of her.//

You use an awful lot of "to be" verbs. In this case, what does it lose to say, "Even now she let her mind think ahead of her." It's more active. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. Of the easier forms to search, I count 68 in this chapter alone, which is more than one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. You need to be choosing more active verbs.

>Every turn of the page had gotten easier, though. When she finally arrived at the page//

These feel a bit awkward juxtaposed, a little contradictory even.

>adrenalin//

Spelled this way, it's actually a proper noun and not quite what you mean. You want "adrenaline."

>Applejack was already pulling up a plastic bag//

>Twilight was already pulling out the money//
Look at the similarity of these, just one line apart.

>She had asked Cheerilee the name and address of the place twice, this had to be it. //

Comma splice.

>Her tone was defensive than she had intended.//

Missing a "more," I think.

>“Well, perhaps not vocally, but your body language says otherwise.” Cheerilee said simply.//

Dialogue punctuation.

>cross section//

Hyphenate.

>a bunch of judgmental children Is not//

Extraneous capitalization.

>but now that Cheerilee had used the word//

Comma after the dependent clause.

>She turned to leave, and promptly bumped into Pinkie Pie.//

It's all one clause, so you don't need the comma.

>I’ll help you, there’s all sorts of ways to make new friends!//

Comma splice.

>and as she climbed the stairs//

>and just as she was about to try a door//
>Even as she made the decision//
Comma needed after the dependent clauses.

>Oh, hey Twilight!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Except,//

Unneeded comma.

>She had learned several times that Rainbow Dash had plenty of good ideas, sometimes she just needed time to express them.//

Comma splice.

>“Oh, you know,” Dash shrugged, “stuff.”//

You can't shrug dialogue. Maybe you meant that as an action in an aside? If so, here's how to do one:
“Oh, you know—” Dash shrugged “—stuff.”

>Yea//

"Yeah" generally works better, as it's pronounced a little differently.

>Cheerilee draped a hoof over Twilight’s shoulder, started to lead her into the building.//

Using a fragment feels a little out of place here, since you haven't been carrying a tone like that throughout the story.

>Cheerilee over to her desk//

Missing word.

>And yet, she didn’t bother to contradict Cheerilee.//

Unneeded comma.

I'm really torn about this story. The first item might be an oversight, but I think it's an important one. The spell specifically said that the effects weren't permanent. That implies Twilight will eventually revert to her old life. Since the onset of it rewrote her life, the expiration must as well, so it's not like she'll be trapped in this situation once that happens. It does bring up the question of whether she'll remeber any of this, given how she can't remember her real life while under the spell's influence. I have a niggling feeling that you did mean for the spell to be permanent, however, so if that's the case, go back and edit that in.

In either case, though, Twilight hasn't learned anything. The whole point of the story is to deliver a message, and while it does that for the reader, it hasn't done that for Twilight. If the effects are permanent, she'll never learn, and she seems rather unconcerned about it. She's happy with her life, so while she can contemplate this issue of choice, it's not implied that she'd have any regrets about the state of her life. But if the spell is not permanent, then the story's real power comes from her going back to her old life with the new realization that she's the sum of her choices, and while that might mean putting up with boring duties, it also means she has her friends. It might even inspire her to be more assertive about keeping her friends together and streamlining the parts of her day that she doesn't like. While there is a moral on display for the reader, Either Twilight never gets one that has a real, personal application, or the story stops well short of her getting it.

This was a nicely written story, and I would have put it on the fast track to posting (after cleaning up the detailed issues, particularly the plethora of "to be" verbs), but when the story marches inexorably on to deliver an obvious truth to Twilight, only to have her in a situation where she won't ever fully realize it or stopping before she gets to that point, depending on the ambiguity of the spell's permanence, just leaves the whole thing feeling unfinished. If you can do something about that, I'd be happy to post it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Four of the six sentences in the third paragraph begin with &quot;the,&quot; and understandably enough, the subject. In fact, all six sentences start with the subject. It&#039;s a fine thing to get across boredom and routine to the reader without making the story boring, so be very careful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;minutia//</span><br />You&#039;re using it for a plural reference, so &quot;minutiae.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if I put it off//</span><br />Needs a comma after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even now she was letting her mind think ahead of her.//</span><br />You use an awful lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. In this case, what does it lose to say, &quot;Even now she let her mind think ahead of her.&quot; It&#039;s more active. These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. Of the easier forms to search, I count 68 in this chapter alone, which is more than one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something <i>doesn&#039;t</i> happen. You need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Every turn of the page had gotten easier, though. When she finally arrived at the page//</span><br />These feel a bit awkward juxtaposed, a little contradictory even.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;adrenalin//</span><br />Spelled this way, it&#039;s actually a proper noun and not quite what you mean. You want &quot;adrenaline.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack was already pulling up a plastic bag//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was already pulling out the money//</span><br />Look at the similarity of these, just one line apart.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had asked Cheerilee the name and address of the place twice, this had to be it. //</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her tone was defensive than she had intended.//</span><br />Missing a &quot;more,&quot; I think.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Well, perhaps not vocally, but your body language says otherwise.” Cheerilee said simply.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cross section//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bunch of judgmental children Is not//</span><br />Extraneous capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but now that Cheerilee had used the word//</span><br />Comma after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned to leave, and promptly bumped into Pinkie Pie.//</span><br />It&#039;s all one clause, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ll help you, there’s all sorts of ways to make new friends!//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and as she climbed the stairs//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and just as she was about to try a door//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even as she made the decision//</span><br />Comma needed after the dependent clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, hey Twilight!//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Except,//</span><br />Unneeded comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had learned several times that Rainbow Dash had plenty of good ideas, sometimes she just needed time to express them.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh, you know,” Dash shrugged, “stuff.”//</span><br />You can&#039;t shrug dialogue. Maybe you meant that as an action in an aside? If so, here&#039;s how to do one:<br />“Oh, you know—” Dash shrugged “—stuff.”<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yea//</span><br />&quot;Yeah&quot; generally works better, as it&#039;s pronounced a little differently.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee draped a hoof over Twilight’s shoulder, started to lead her into the building.//</span><br />Using a fragment feels a little out of place here, since you haven&#039;t been carrying a tone like that throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee over to her desk//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And yet, she didn’t bother to contradict Cheerilee.//</span><br />Unneeded comma.<br /><br />I&#039;m really torn about this story. The first item might be an oversight, but I think it&#039;s an important one. The spell specifically said that the effects weren&#039;t permanent. That implies Twilight will eventually revert to her old life. Since the onset of it rewrote her life, the expiration must as well, so it&#039;s not like she&#039;ll be trapped in this situation once that happens. It does bring up the question of whether she&#039;ll remeber any of this, given how she can&#039;t remember her real life while under the spell&#039;s influence. I have a niggling feeling that you did mean for the spell to be permanent, however, so if that&#039;s the case, go back and edit that in.<br /><br />In either case, though, Twilight hasn&#039;t learned anything. The whole point of the story is to deliver a message, and while it does that for the reader, it hasn&#039;t done that for Twilight. If the effects are permanent, she&#039;ll never learn, and she seems rather unconcerned about it. She&#039;s happy with her life, so while she can contemplate this issue of choice, it&#039;s not implied that she&#039;d have any regrets about the state of her life. But if the spell is not permanent, then the story&#039;s real power comes from her going back to her old life with the new realization that she&#039;s the sum of her choices, and while that might mean putting up with boring duties, it also means she has her friends. It might even inspire her to be more assertive about keeping her friends together and streamlining the parts of her day that she doesn&#039;t like. While there is a moral on display for the reader, Either Twilight never gets one that has a real, personal application, or the story stops well short of her getting it.<br /><br />This was a nicely written story, and I would have put it on the fast track to posting (after cleaning up the detailed issues, particularly the plethora of &quot;to be&quot; verbs), but when the story marches inexorably on to deliver an obvious truth to Twilight, only to have her in a situation where she won&#039;t ever fully realize it or stopping before she gets to that point, depending on the ambiguity of the spell&#039;s permanence, just leaves the whole thing feeling unfinished. If you can do something about that, I&#039;d be happy to post it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 257

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

So, sadfics are a specialty of mine. Let's see how we can really whip this into something even more special.

>wrought iron//

Since it's being used as a descriptor, hyphenate it.

>The hedges towered over the iron walls and stood as near perfect rectangles all along the property.//

What iron walls? Of the house? Or along the edge of the property? If the latter, she's already described the gate and columns near her, so why didn't she add the walls back then. This leads into my other point: You want the description to flow pretty continuously as her eye scans from the gate, further and further away, until you get to the house. You do that fine, but then you add the hedges and walls afterward. Keep it in a logical order.

>It rustled in a light breeze, as the edges made a desperate attempt to catch in the wind and fly away//

Note that using a comma with an "as" clause tends to create a feeling of "because," while going without more often connotes "at the same time that."

>his daughter; Diamond Tiara//

Your're defining, clarifying, or providing an example here. Use a colon.

>“Although… it would be faster to just go there now.”//

Having a character muse out loud to herself can quickly exhaust a sense of authenticity. She can wonder to herself in the narration. The more she monologues, the less real it will seem.

>porch. His knees wobbled as he trotted to the edge of the porch//

Watch the close repetition of words.

>I’m sorry sir//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>“Best that you do. You wouldn’t want to be on the grounds when Miss Tiara’s dogs are out,” and the door shut behind him.//

You can't just tack an action onto a quote with a comma. It has to be a speaking action. As is, you'd have to make these separate sentences.

>The dog narrowed his eyes and began to growl. He rose from his haunches and started moving slowly towards her, teeth bared.

>
>Apple Bloom tensed and started backing away.//
This is somewhat of a pet peeve for me, but I think it makes for good writing advice, too. You have three sentences in a row with "start" or "begin." These are verbs that inexperienced authors use too often, and often as a blunt tool. It's a given that any action would start, so spelling it out is fairly redundant. It's only worth calling attention to a beginning when it's noteworthy for some reason, like it's abrupt or the action gets interrupted.

>The dog let out a single, ferocious bark, and dug into the ground as it lunged at her.//

The second comma is unnecessary, since it's all a single clause. When using a comma with a conjunction, check to make sure there are actually distinct subject/verb pairs. There are some examples in the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Apple Bloom allowed herself a burst of speed in to close the gap as fast as possible//

That "in" is extraneous.

>It shook its head as it finally stopped and stared at the other dog.//

This is the third time in four sentences that you've used an "as" clause. It makes for a repetitive feel.

>the two dogs synchronized in their movements//

That's pretty awkwardly phrased.

>on Filthy Rich’s property//

This really doesn't bear saying. There's no reason to think she wasn't still there.

>As the dogs closed in, their barks became louder behind her. She barely made it into the bushes as a set of teeth grazed her tail.//

Yeah, it's really getting noticeable how many "as" clauses you use.

>her face full of anger//

Read the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. In short, you'll forge a much stronger emotional connection with the character by describing her in such a way that I can tell she's angry without your having to say so. And it's pretty important to make a connection like that when the character is first introduced.

>On the other side of the bushes, Apple Bloom raised her eyebrow at what she saw.//

Modifier placement is hindering your meaning here. Because of their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like Apple Bloom is on the other side of the bushes.

>Her eyes focused on the stone//

From her vantage point, how could Apple Bloom tell this?

>Hi mom//

Needs a comma for direct address, and when used in place of a name, "Mom" gets capitalized.

>ok//

Spell it out as "okay."

>mommy//

Same as before. Capitalize.

>She started sobbing loudly with nopony around to hear her save for Apple Bloom.//

Be very careful. If you cross the line to melodrama, the story loses its power, because it feels less real. People in general try to control themselves. Plus she'd reasonably assume that someone in the house might hear her. I doubt she'd want the butler to know, and there may well be other staff. Also consider that this isn't a fresh wound for her, so she's had some time to get used to it. In sad stories, less is often more.

>Apple Bloom’s chest felt tightened.//

Why bother putting that "felt" there? It's unnecessary and actually distances the sensation from her.

>She remembered what had happened to Diamond Tiara’s mother so long ago, but only remembered slivers of it.//

Watch the close repetition of "remembered."

>The branch gave way beneath Apple Bloom, and she plummeted to the ground below with a loud scream. She landed hard on the grass and rolled away from the branch in a heap. Her head spun, her vision went blurry and pain lanced at her sides. She struggled to roll onto her belly and stand, aches nipping at each leg. She slowly lifted her head, coming face to face with Diamond Tiara.//

This whole sequence is quite stoic. Where is Apple Bloom's emotion during it? Since you're keeping the narrative point of view with her, the narrator can reflect her mood by getting excited, stating her thoughts for her, changing tracks rapidly. You want the narration to be reflective of her mood and state of mind here.

>She heard soft voice//

Missing word.

>“Are you okay, Apple Bloom?” Scootaloo asked. “You don’t look so good.”//

I'm scanning ahead in the conversation a bit, and for two friends who should be concerned about her, they don't act that way. In fact, they don't act much at all. Let me see some more of their body language and expressions here. There's a rationale give in the section on talking heads at the top of this thread.

>Apple Bloom shook her head, and forced a smile.//

Just a reminder to work out these comma/conjunction issues. I've only pointed out a few examples.

>Scootaloo sneezed and rubbed her nose.//

Missing a line break here. And look at the paragraphs around here. See how many of them begin with a very short declarative sentence. It's nice that you're alternating narration and dialogue pretty well, but when all of the narration has the same structure, it starts to feel like a list.

>she just muttered a quiet, “here.”//

By making this a generic thing and not actual speech through the use of "a," the rules of dialogue don't apply. You're fine with it being lower case, but you don't need the comma.

>as small coils of guilt started working their way up and tightening around her neck//

The physical description is nice but the outright use of "guilt" robs this of its subtlety.

>“Yes, that sounds okay. Thank you, Miss Cheerilee.”//

This could really stand some more description. Spend a little while in Apple Bloom's head while this is going on. Is she doubled over and clutching her stomach? Does she feel like she's going to throw up? Is she going to agree to whatever Cheerilee says just so she can get to that cot quickly? Does she really want Big Mac or AJ to come check on her? Does the cool air in the back room feel good to her? Details like that will really sell this moment. This is a big emotional crux of the story, so don't gloss over what impact it has on her. I see that she never goes to the back room, but there's no reason she couldn't. It might give her a moment to think, and then she leaves. Your call on that one.

>She forced more breaths down into her lungs as she waited for somepony to answer.//

Four sentences in a row with an "as" clause.

>which cast a long, square silhouette into the room//

Well, no, the silhouette would be Apple Bloom's. A silhouette is the backlit shadow, not the light.

>child jewelry//

Odd phrasing. "Children's," maybe?

>On the other side was a four poster bed//

Look how much of this description relies on boring "to be" verbs. You should be choosing more active verbs here.

>Diamond Tiara dismissed//

That's a really questionable choice of speaking verb, but it's transitive in any case. It needs a direct object, and the dialogue doesn't count.

>struggled to back away, but with little effort//

That's kind of contradictory. "Struggle" implies more than a little effort.

>actin//

Missing the apostrophe.

>status improving…thing//

Hyphenate the descriptor and leave a space after the ellipsis. The latter happens throughout the story.

>She collapsed to the ground.//

Pretty repetitive with collapsing to her haunches.

>She couldn’t finish the sentence, she just shrugged and dug herself deeper into her legs.//

Comma splice.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. This happens a few times.

>Diamond Tiara paused. She turned her head, staring with disbelief. “What did you say?”//

This is a bit over the top. It doesn't feel like something a real person would do, more like something you'd see in a Hallmark movie. Really, really put yourself in DT's place and think about what her response would be. Quite possibly, she wouldn't say anything, just watch and wait, leaving the ball in AB's court.

>honest to goodness//

Hyphenate.

>She shuddered and buried her head into Apple Bloom’s neck and wept against her.//

Compare this to the earlier outright sobbing. This is much more controlled and much more natural feeling. I'd argue that it's also much more powerful for its restraint.

>A chill wind swept over the hill on the Rich property.//

The first two paragraphs of this scene have quite a bit of word repetition. That just makes the writing feel unimaginative, unless it's clear that the repetition is deliberate, but there are none of the markers for that here. They would include emphasizing the repetition so that the narrator is obviously aware of it or linking the repetition to some thematic element you've been carrying through the story.

>Goodbye Mommy//

Comma for direct address.

>Diamond Tiara was trembling again//

A lot of your verbs around here have a "to be" auxiliary on them. It's really not necessary, and it diminishes the action to do so.

>and steady her//

The syntax is off here. There are a few ways to change it so it makes sense, but it depends on exactly what you want it to say.

Overall, this was well done. It should be obvious what the consistent problems were by now, but there's nothing fundamentally wrong here, so that really minimizes the amount of work it'd take to fix it up. Just pay attention to the few mechanical and repetition issues I had to keep bringing up, watch the telling at key moments, and consider dialing back some of the melodramatic moments. I also wonder if you wouldn't consider revisiting Silver Spoon's character some. DT appreciates that AB is able to see that there's more to her than she might put out there for the public to see. Maybe now she'd realize that the same could be true of SS? Especially since canon makes DT out to be more of the ringleader, SS wouldn't necessarily be resistant. I mean, you could go full-bore and show all that happening, but it wouldn't be necessary. Just having her admit the possibility and deciding to give it a try would leave another nice optimistic note. Up to you, though.

This is definitely headed in the right direction, and I think you're on the short track to being posted. Please resubmit when you're ready.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />So, sadfics are a specialty of mine. Let&#039;s see how we can really whip this into something even more special.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wrought iron//</span><br />Since it&#039;s being used as a descriptor, hyphenate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The hedges towered over the iron walls and stood as near perfect rectangles all along the property.//</span><br />What iron walls? Of the house? Or along the edge of the property? If the latter, she&#039;s already described the gate and columns near her, so why didn&#039;t she add the walls back then. This leads into my other point: You want the description to flow pretty continuously as her eye scans from the gate, further and further away, until you get to the house. You do that fine, but then you add the hedges and walls afterward. Keep it in a logical order.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It rustled in a light breeze, as the edges made a desperate attempt to catch in the wind and fly away//</span><br />Note that using a comma with an &quot;as&quot; clause tends to create a feeling of &quot;because,&quot; while going without more often connotes &quot;at the same time that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his daughter; Diamond Tiara//</span><br />Your&#039;re defining, clarifying, or providing an example here. Use a colon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Although… it would be faster to just go there now.”//</span><br />Having a character muse out loud to herself can quickly exhaust a sense of authenticity. She can wonder to herself in the narration. The more she monologues, the less real it will seem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;porch. His knees wobbled as he trotted to the edge of the porch//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sorry sir//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Best that you do. You wouldn’t want to be on the grounds when Miss Tiara’s dogs are out,” and the door shut behind him.//</span><br />You can&#039;t just tack an action onto a quote with a comma. It has to be a speaking action. As is, you&#039;d have to make these separate sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The dog narrowed his eyes and began to growl. He rose from his haunches and started moving slowly towards her, teeth bared.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom tensed and started backing away.//</span><br />This is somewhat of a pet peeve for me, but I think it makes for good writing advice, too. You have three sentences in a row with &quot;start&quot; or &quot;begin.&quot; These are verbs that inexperienced authors use too often, and often as a blunt tool. It&#039;s a given that any action would start, so spelling it out is fairly redundant. It&#039;s only worth calling attention to a beginning when it&#039;s noteworthy for some reason, like it&#039;s abrupt or the action gets interrupted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The dog let out a single, ferocious bark, and dug into the ground as it lunged at her.//</span><br />The second comma is unnecessary, since it&#039;s all a single clause. When using a comma with a conjunction, check to make sure there are actually distinct subject/verb pairs. There are some examples in the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom allowed herself a burst of speed in to close the gap as fast as possible//</span><br />That &quot;in&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It shook its head as it finally stopped and stared at the other dog.//</span><br />This is the third time in four sentences that you&#039;ve used an &quot;as&quot; clause. It makes for a repetitive feel.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the two dogs synchronized in their movements//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on Filthy Rich’s property//</span><br />This really doesn&#039;t bear saying. There&#039;s no reason to think she wasn&#039;t still there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the dogs closed in, their barks became louder behind her. She barely made it into the bushes as a set of teeth grazed her tail.//</span><br />Yeah, it&#039;s really getting noticeable how many &quot;as&quot; clauses you use.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her face full of anger//</span><br />Read the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread. In short, you&#039;ll forge a much stronger emotional connection with the character by describing her in such a way that I can tell she&#039;s angry without your having to say so. And it&#039;s pretty important to make a connection like that when the character is first introduced.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On the other side of the bushes, Apple Bloom raised her eyebrow at what she saw.//</span><br />Modifier placement is hindering your meaning here. Because of their proximity in the sentence, it sounds like Apple Bloom is on the other side of the bushes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes focused on the stone//</span><br />From her vantage point, how could Apple Bloom tell this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hi mom//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address, and when used in place of a name, &quot;Mom&quot; gets capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ok//</span><br />Spell it out as &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mommy//</span><br />Same as before. Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She started sobbing loudly with nopony around to hear her save for Apple Bloom.//</span><br />Be very careful. If you cross the line to melodrama, the story loses its power, because it feels less real. People in general try to control themselves. Plus she&#039;d reasonably assume that someone in the house might hear her. I doubt she&#039;d want the butler to know, and there may well be other staff. Also consider that this isn&#039;t a fresh wound for her, so she&#039;s had some time to get used to it. In sad stories, less is often more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom’s chest felt tightened.//</span><br />Why bother putting that &quot;felt&quot; there? It&#039;s unnecessary and actually distances the sensation from her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She remembered what had happened to Diamond Tiara’s mother so long ago, but only remembered slivers of it.//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;remembered.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The branch gave way beneath Apple Bloom, and she plummeted to the ground below with a loud scream. She landed hard on the grass and rolled away from the branch in a heap. Her head spun, her vision went blurry and pain lanced at her sides. She struggled to roll onto her belly and stand, aches nipping at each leg. She slowly lifted her head, coming face to face with Diamond Tiara.//</span><br />This whole sequence is quite stoic. Where is Apple Bloom&#039;s emotion during it? Since you&#039;re keeping the narrative point of view with her, the narrator can reflect her mood by getting excited, stating her thoughts for her, changing tracks rapidly. You want the narration to be reflective of her mood and state of mind here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She heard soft voice//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Are you okay, Apple Bloom?” Scootaloo asked. “You don’t look so good.”//</span><br />I&#039;m scanning ahead in the conversation a bit, and for two friends who should be concerned about her, they don&#039;t act that way. In fact, they don&#039;t act much at all. Let me see some more of their body language and expressions here. There&#039;s a rationale give in the section on talking heads at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom shook her head, and forced a smile.//</span><br />Just a reminder to work out these comma/conjunction issues. I&#039;ve only pointed out a few examples.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo sneezed and rubbed her nose.//</span><br />Missing a line break here. And look at the paragraphs around here. See how many of them begin with a very short declarative sentence. It&#039;s nice that you&#039;re alternating narration and dialogue pretty well, but when all of the narration has the same structure, it starts to feel like a list.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she just muttered a quiet, “here.”//</span><br />By making this a generic thing and not actual speech through the use of &quot;a,&quot; the rules of dialogue don&#039;t apply. You&#039;re fine with it being lower case, but you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as small coils of guilt started working their way up and tightening around her neck//</span><br />The physical description is nice but the outright use of &quot;guilt&quot; robs this of its subtlety.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yes, that sounds okay. Thank you, Miss Cheerilee.”//</span><br />This could really stand some more description. Spend a little while in Apple Bloom&#039;s head while this is going on. Is she doubled over and clutching her stomach? Does she feel like she&#039;s going to throw up? Is she going to agree to whatever Cheerilee says just so she can get to that cot quickly? Does she really want Big Mac or AJ to come check on her? Does the cool air in the back room feel good to her? Details like that will really sell this moment. This is a big emotional crux of the story, so don&#039;t gloss over what impact it has on her. I see that she never goes to the back room, but there&#039;s no reason she couldn&#039;t. It might give her a moment to think, and then she leaves. Your call on that one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She forced more breaths down into her lungs as she waited for somepony to answer.//</span><br />Four sentences in a row with an &quot;as&quot; clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which cast a long, square silhouette into the room//</span><br />Well, no, the silhouette would be Apple Bloom&#039;s. A silhouette is the backlit shadow, not the light.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;child jewelry//</span><br />Odd phrasing. &quot;Children&#039;s,&quot; maybe?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On the other side was a four poster bed//</span><br />Look how much of this description relies on boring &quot;to be&quot; verbs. You should be choosing more active verbs here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond Tiara dismissed//</span><br />That&#039;s a really questionable choice of speaking verb, but it&#039;s transitive in any case. It needs a direct object, and the dialogue doesn&#039;t count.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;struggled to back away, but with little effort//</span><br />That&#039;s kind of contradictory. &quot;Struggle&quot; implies more than a little effort.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;actin//</span><br />Missing the apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;status improving…thing//</span><br />Hyphenate the descriptor and leave a space after the ellipsis. The latter happens throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She collapsed to the ground.//</span><br />Pretty repetitive with collapsing to her haunches.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She couldn’t finish the sentence, she just shrugged and dug herself deeper into her legs.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. This happens a few times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond Tiara paused. She turned her head, staring with disbelief. “What did you say?”//</span><br />This is a bit over the top. It doesn&#039;t feel like something a real person would do, more like something you&#039;d see in a Hallmark movie. Really, really put yourself in DT&#039;s place and think about what her response would be. Quite possibly, she wouldn&#039;t say anything, just watch and wait, leaving the ball in AB&#039;s court.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;honest to goodness//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She shuddered and buried her head into Apple Bloom’s neck and wept against her.//</span><br />Compare this to the earlier outright sobbing. This is much more controlled and much more natural feeling. I&#039;d argue that it&#039;s also much more powerful for its restraint.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A chill wind swept over the hill on the Rich property.//</span><br />The first two paragraphs of this scene have quite a bit of word repetition. That just makes the writing feel unimaginative, unless it&#039;s clear that the repetition is deliberate, but there are none of the markers for that here. They would include emphasizing the repetition so that the narrator is obviously aware of it or linking the repetition to some thematic element you&#039;ve been carrying through the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Goodbye Mommy//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Diamond Tiara was trembling again//</span><br />A lot of your verbs around here have a &quot;to be&quot; auxiliary on them. It&#039;s really not necessary, and it diminishes the action to do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and steady her//</span><br />The syntax is off here. There are a few ways to change it so it makes sense, but it depends on exactly what you want it to say.<br /><br />Overall, this was well done. It should be obvious what the consistent problems were by now, but there&#039;s nothing fundamentally wrong here, so that really minimizes the amount of work it&#039;d take to fix it up. Just pay attention to the few mechanical and repetition issues I had to keep bringing up, watch the telling at key moments, and consider dialing back some of the melodramatic moments. I also wonder if you wouldn&#039;t consider revisiting Silver Spoon&#039;s character some. DT appreciates that AB is able to see that there&#039;s more to her than she might put out there for the public to see. Maybe now she&#039;d realize that the same could be true of <abbr title="Sisterhooves Social">SS</abbr>? Especially since canon makes DT out to be more of the ringleader, <abbr title="Sisterhooves Social">SS</abbr> wouldn&#039;t necessarily be resistant. I mean, you could go full-bore and show all that happening, but it wouldn&#039;t be necessary. Just having her admit the possibility and deciding to give it a try would leave another nice optimistic note. Up to you, though.<br /><br />This is definitely headed in the right direction, and I think you&#039;re on the short track to being posted. Please resubmit when you&#039;re ready.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 258

>>130946
The use of passive voice and similar sentence structure was mostly intentional, though it looks like I overdid it. Twilight is an extremely passive character, and I wanted to get that across without bloating the story with lots of boring minutia.

The description of the spell is a trickier issue–the first draft (and second) gave the spell only the barest of description (a title along the lines of "Obscurity spell" or "Freedom spell" and nothing else). I thought the ambiguity of it gave the reader more room to interpret its effects (and thus the themes of the story). An editor felt that it did the opposite, however; that the unclear mechanics of the spell made the rest of the story harder to invest in.

It seems I may have gone too far in the other direction and made it too explicit (especially the part about it wearing off).

If you have any specific recommendation, I would of course be happy to hear it. Even if not, thanks for your advice so far :)

cp<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130946" onclick="return highlight('130946', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130946">&gt;&gt;130946</a><br />The use of passive voice and similar sentence structure was mostly intentional, though it looks like I overdid it. Twilight is an extremely passive character, and I wanted to get that across without bloating the story with lots of boring minutia.<br /><br />The description of the spell is a trickier issue–the first draft (and second) gave the spell only the barest of description (a title along the lines of &quot;Obscurity spell&quot; or &quot;Freedom spell&quot; and nothing else). I thought the ambiguity of it gave the reader more room to interpret its effects (and thus the themes of the story). An editor felt that it did the opposite, however; that the unclear mechanics of the spell made the rest of the story harder to invest in.<br /><br />It seems I may have gone too far in the other direction and made it too explicit (especially the part about it wearing off).<br /><br />If you have any specific recommendation, I would of course be happy to hear it. Even if not, thanks for your advice so far :)<br /><br />cp<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 259

>>130946
>>130951
Followup question: I've been try to go through the story and change it to have more active sentences. Most of the guides I consulted, however, pointed out that active sentences tend to have sentences that start with the subject.

Your critique pointed to both the overuse of passive voice AND an abundance of sentences starting with the subject as problems. Am I missing something, or is there some way to fix the former without causing the latter?

thanks,
cp<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130946" onclick="return highlight('130946', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130946">&gt;&gt;130946</a><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130951" onclick="return highlight('130951', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130951">&gt;&gt;130951</a><br />Followup question: I&#039;ve been try to go through the story and change it to have more active sentences. Most of the guides I consulted, however, pointed out that active sentences tend to have sentences that start with the subject.<br /><br />Your critique pointed to both the overuse of passive voice AND an abundance of sentences starting with the subject as problems. Am I missing something, or is there some way to fix the former without causing the latter?<br /><br />thanks,<br />cp<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 260

>>130954
Starting with the subject has little to do with passive voice. In fact, many passively voiced sentences start with the subject. Just strive to minimize times when the subject isn't the thing performing the action, as in "The book was placed on the table." As to other ways to begin sentences, there are many. A prepositional phrase, an absolute phrase. (Be careful with these:) A participial phrase, an adverb. In rare instances, a direct or indirect object, a predicate noun/pronoun, or a predicate adjective.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130954" onclick="return highlight('130954', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130954">&gt;&gt;130954</a><br />Starting with the subject has little to do with passive voice. In fact, many passively voiced sentences start with the subject. Just strive to minimize times when the subject isn&#039;t the thing performing the action, as in &quot;The book was placed on the table.&quot; As to other ways to begin sentences, there are many. A prepositional phrase, an absolute phrase. (Be careful with these:) A participial phrase, an adverb. In rare instances, a direct or indirect object, a predicate noun/pronoun, or a predicate adjective.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 261

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>life - with //

Please use proper dashes. This is a recurring issue.

>weeks worth//

Missing apostrophe.

> loosing track of time//

Typo.

>and seeing the car is empty//

Participles should be set off with a comma. You do this in a number of places.

>As the train stops//

Most times, dependent clauses should also be set off with a comma. I also found multiple examples of this.

>"Why wasn't I informed of this last night," a familiar voice asks.//

So where's the question mark?

>Instead there is rubble//

Seems haphazard of him to cause structural damage to the castle, especially since this story isn't the type for exaggeration.

>purple tinged//

Hyphenate compound descriptors.

>Hangs, not in the manner of a picture, but in the way of a nail; not placed with care, but forcefully inserted.//

Semicolons really do call a formalism that needs proper sentence structure, so by having no independent clause afterward, it feels incongruous.

>certainly by mistake, I'm sure//

The "certainly" and "I'm sure" are pretty redundant.

>"The error was mine," I lift his face to meet mine.//

>I should be so fortunate," I turn to my brother.//
If you transition from speech to narration, that narration has to be a speaking action. You can'y just tack on any given action with a comma.

>"Now," I walk passed them to collect my bags.//

Same thing again, plus confusion between past and passed.

>little sister//

Another compound modifier that needs a hyphen.

>Of her castle, if I'm being pedantic.//

This is begging for emphasis on the "her."

>She raises an eyebrow in curiosity.//

These "in/of/with emotion/mood" phrases are almost always redundant with a description already in the sentence.

>would be//

Another hyphen needed. This is also a systemic issue, but one that can be tougher to ferret out on your own, so I've been pointing out most of them.

>I, I'm//

Commas aren't really for dramatic pauses or stutters. A dash, hyphen, or dash would work.

>food on her plates, picking up food//

Watch the close repetition of words.

>leaving the aforementioned brand//

This doesn't strike me as a phrasing that would naturally some up in conversation. She's not in a formal setting or giving a rehearsed speech, so it needs to sound off-the-cuff.

>she hesitates.//

First off, the capitalization pattern suggests a narrative aside, but then the sentence ends. And you don't need to tell me she hesitates when it's already apparent.

>it won't be any less stressful than the first one//

There really wasn't any evidence of stress. If you want we to feel like that discussion was an ordeal, then you need to make their emotions come through more clearly.

>all wrapped up//

Watch the close repetition of "wrap" from the previous paragraph.

>open air//

>once reasonable//
Hyphenate.

>I have to believe each team of planners and architects through history thought they would be the last to add to the city.//

Four of the last five sentences begin with "I." Mix it up a bit more. It's getting repetitive.

>There's waiting line leading to the throne room.//

Missing word.

>I could probably excuse my way passed//

More past/passed confusion. Looks like it's not just a one-time oversight. Learn the difference.

>"What are we waiting in line for,"//

It's a question, isn't it?

>well dressed//

>millennium old//
Hyphenate.

>O//

Why is this capitalized?

>"To what do we owe the pleasure of your most royal presence, Princess Twilight Sparkle,"//

Missing question mark again. This also appears to be a consistent problem.

>Ancient pegasi formal posture//

You're more or less using "pegasi" as a noun adjunct, so it should be singular. You wouldn't say "ancient pegasi history," for instance.

>now archaic//

Hyphenate.

>There is a place in the city for which I hold great affection; my home away from home.//

Another misused semicolon.

>sit by side//

Missing word.

>what appears to be astronomy notes and the exposed pages of several books//

"Appears" is referencing multiple things, so make it plural.

>'please don't worry. I'll take care of them.'//

>'the little miss said the same thing.//
>'sorry sonny//
>'you have to show proper respect to other ponies.'//
Capitalization. It doesn't matter that these are nested quotes. They're still dialogue.

>Speaking of which," I encase the book fort, minus the few open volumes Storm was napping on, in a pink hue. "Do you mind if I clean up?"//

This really seems like you're trying to do a narrative aside breaking a quote. Here's how:
Speaking of which—" I encase the book fort, minus the few open volumes Storm was napping on, in a pink hue "—do you mind if I clean up?"

>Now, little Storm//

Look how often these characters use direct address in this conversation. Then think about how often you do so in one of your everyday conversations.

>in ages passed//

Past.

>She's shaken still//

Pretty much the exact description given of her just a few paragraphs ago.

>dry eyed//

Hyphenate.

Twilight and Luna's conversation is also steeped in such flowery and rehearsed language that it loses a feel of spontaneity and authenticity. Grandstanding has its place, but you're running counter to the intimate atmosphere you're trying to create here. Even if it were justified as an extension of their word games, they're not in a playful mood.

>I was unsure how to react to this change, to this 'niece' my sister adopted.//

So how does she feel about Prince Blueblood? And presumably there are more.

>Regret waters Luna's eyes.//

How would Twilight know it was regret?

>thirty three point three percent//

Hyphenate. And see my previous point about Blueblood.

>"The use for knowledge such as yours is endless," I let slip an unsightly yawn.//

Again attaching a non-speaking action to dialogue.

>I slip out of my cloak, folding it neatly and placing it beside the table Celestia set up for us.//

Here's a common danger of participles: they signify concurrent action. So you have her removing the cloak at the same time she folds it and places it on the table. They'd logically occur in sequence, not simultaneously.

>She takes a long sip of tea, ever calm.//

First, you just described her as "ever calm" not long ago, and second, the placement in the sentence suggests that it's the tea that is ever calm here.

>But this" - I fluff my wings and tap my horn - "is different.//

Note the difference between the dash placement here and in the example I gave you earlier. This one suggests that the speaker doesn't stop for the action, which is probably not the case here.

>I drink deeply from my own//

Conversing over tea is a very common thing in fanfiction. Unfortunately, so is running out of ways to say that a character takes a drink. It gets repetitive quickly. Try to work on that or have them perform different actions than enjoying their tea.

>I drink deep from my tea again.//

Case in point.

>Celestia sips from her cup. Ever calm, ever patient.//

Same. And again with the "ever calm."

>I hadn't realized I was holding my breath//

This is an incredibly cliched thing.

>"Keep up the good work."//

Your call, but I feel like this loses much of its impact due to the lack of any kind of reaction from Twilight. It wouldn't have to be much, but she's learned several lessons already, and I have no indication that she comes away from this meeting with anything.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;life - with //</span><br />Please use proper dashes. This is a recurring issue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;weeks worth//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; loosing track of time//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and seeing the car is empty//</span><br />Participles should be set off with a comma. You do this in a number of places.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the train stops//</span><br />Most times, dependent clauses should also be set off with a comma. I also found multiple examples of this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Why wasn&#039;t I informed of this last night,&quot; a familiar voice asks.//</span><br />So where&#039;s the question mark?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Instead there is rubble//</span><br />Seems haphazard of him to cause structural damage to the castle, especially since this story isn&#039;t the type for exaggeration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;purple tinged//</span><br />Hyphenate compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hangs, not in the manner of a picture, but in the way of a nail; not placed with care, but forcefully inserted.//</span><br />Semicolons really do call a formalism that needs proper sentence structure, so by having no independent clause afterward, it feels incongruous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;certainly by mistake, I&#039;m sure//</span><br />The &quot;certainly&quot; and &quot;I&#039;m sure&quot; are pretty redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;The error was mine,&quot; I lift his face to meet mine.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I should be so fortunate,&quot; I turn to my brother.//</span><br />If you transition from speech to narration, that narration has to be a speaking action. You can&#039;y just tack on any given action with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Now,&quot; I walk passed them to collect my bags.//</span><br />Same thing again, plus confusion between past and passed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little sister//</span><br />Another compound modifier that needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Of her castle, if I&#039;m being pedantic.//</span><br />This is begging for emphasis on the &quot;her.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She raises an eyebrow in curiosity.//</span><br />These &quot;in/of/with emotion/mood&quot; phrases are almost always redundant with a description already in the sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;would be//</span><br />Another hyphen needed. This is also a systemic issue, but one that can be tougher to ferret out on your own, so I&#039;ve been pointing out most of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I, I&#039;m//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t really for dramatic pauses or stutters. A dash, hyphen, or dash would work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;food on her plates, picking up food//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaving the aforementioned brand//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t strike me as a phrasing that would naturally some up in conversation. She&#039;s not in a formal setting or giving a rehearsed speech, so it needs to sound off-the-cuff.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she hesitates.//</span><br />First off, the capitalization pattern suggests a narrative aside, but then the sentence ends. And you don&#039;t need to tell me she hesitates when it&#039;s already apparent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it won&#039;t be any less stressful than the first one//</span><br />There really wasn&#039;t any evidence of stress. If you want we to feel like that discussion was an ordeal, then you need to make their emotions come through more clearly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all wrapped up//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;wrap&quot; from the previous paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;open air//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once reasonable//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have to believe each team of planners and architects through history thought they would be the last to add to the city.//</span><br />Four of the last five sentences begin with &quot;I.&quot; Mix it up a bit more. It&#039;s getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s waiting line leading to the throne room.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I could probably excuse my way passed//</span><br />More past/passed confusion. Looks like it&#039;s not just a one-time oversight. Learn the difference.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;What are we waiting in line for,&quot;//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well dressed//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;millennium old//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;O//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;To what do we owe the pleasure of your most royal presence, Princess Twilight Sparkle,&quot;//</span><br />Missing question mark again. This also appears to be a consistent problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ancient pegasi formal posture//</span><br />You&#039;re more or less using &quot;pegasi&quot; as a noun adjunct, so it should be singular. You wouldn&#039;t say &quot;ancient pegasi history,&quot; for instance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now archaic//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There is a place in the city for which I hold great affection; my home away from home.//</span><br />Another misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sit by side//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;what appears to be astronomy notes and the exposed pages of several books//</span><br />&quot;Appears&quot; is referencing multiple things, so make it plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;please don&#039;t worry. I&#039;ll take care of them.&#039;//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;the little miss said the same thing.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;sorry sonny//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;you have to show proper respect to other ponies.&#039;//</span><br />Capitalization. It doesn&#039;t matter that these are nested quotes. They&#039;re still dialogue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Speaking of which,&quot; I encase the book fort, minus the few open volumes Storm was napping on, in a pink hue. &quot;Do you mind if I clean up?&quot;//</span><br />This really seems like you&#039;re trying to do a narrative aside breaking a quote. Here&#039;s how:<br />Speaking of which—&quot; I encase the book fort, minus the few open volumes Storm was napping on, in a pink hue &quot;—do you mind if I clean up?&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now, little Storm//</span><br />Look how often these characters use direct address in this conversation. Then think about how often you do so in one of your everyday conversations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in ages passed//</span><br />Past.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She&#039;s shaken still//</span><br />Pretty much the exact description given of her just a few paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dry eyed//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br />Twilight and Luna&#039;s conversation is also steeped in such flowery and rehearsed language that it loses a feel of spontaneity and authenticity. Grandstanding has its place, but you&#039;re running counter to the intimate atmosphere you&#039;re trying to create here. Even if it were justified as an extension of their word games, they&#039;re not in a playful mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was unsure how to react to this change, to this &#039;niece&#039; my sister adopted.//</span><br />So how does she feel about Prince Blueblood? And presumably there are more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Regret waters Luna&#039;s eyes.//</span><br />How would Twilight know it was regret?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thirty three point three percent//</span><br />Hyphenate. And see my previous point about Blueblood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;The use for knowledge such as yours is endless,&quot; I let slip an unsightly yawn.//</span><br />Again attaching a non-speaking action to dialogue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I slip out of my cloak, folding it neatly and placing it beside the table Celestia set up for us.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a common danger of participles: they signify concurrent action. So you have her removing the cloak at the same time she folds it and places it on the table. They&#039;d logically occur in sequence, not simultaneously.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She takes a long sip of tea, ever calm.//</span><br />First, you just described her as &quot;ever calm&quot; not long ago, and second, the placement in the sentence suggests that it&#039;s the tea that is ever calm here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But this&quot; - I fluff my wings and tap my horn - &quot;is different.//</span><br />Note the difference between the dash placement here and in the example I gave you earlier. This one suggests that the speaker doesn&#039;t stop for the action, which is probably not the case here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I drink deeply from my own//</span><br />Conversing over tea is a very common thing in fanfiction. Unfortunately, so is running out of ways to say that a character takes a drink. It gets repetitive quickly. Try to work on that or have them perform different actions than enjoying their tea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I drink deep from my tea again.//</span><br />Case in point.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia sips from her cup. Ever calm, ever patient.//</span><br />Same. And again with the &quot;ever calm.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hadn&#039;t realized I was holding my breath//</span><br />This is an incredibly cliched thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Keep up the good work.&quot;//</span><br />Your call, but I feel like this loses much of its impact due to the lack of any kind of reaction from Twilight. It wouldn&#039;t have to be much, but she&#039;s learned several lessons already, and I have no indication that she comes away from this meeting with anything.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 262

>>130963
I appreciate the time you spent combing through my work. It's great to see such detailed feedback. Thank you.

I'll post an in-depth reply once I've had time to edit and give your advice proper consideration.

Thanks again for the time and effort.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130963" onclick="return highlight('130963', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130963">&gt;&gt;130963</a><br />I appreciate the time you spent combing through my work. It&#039;s great to see such detailed feedback. Thank you.<br /><br />I&#039;ll post an in-depth reply once I&#039;ve had time to edit and give your advice proper consideration.<br /><br />Thanks again for the time and effort.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 263

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>blue and white plumage, the former color covering her head and chest with a few blue streaks through it//

So her head and chest are blue with blue streaks? I don't get it…

>while the latter coating her forelegs and wings//

Verb form. I'll also say that since the narration takes Cranky's perspective, it's odd to get this detailed description of her appearance. He's seen her plenty of times before, so why is it catching his notice now?

>One already lost almost all of its leaves//

Verb tense.

>She jabbed him gently in the side, then turned around and walked to the other side of the room.//

Look how often you've already used this "He did one action, then another" structure.

>top class//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>wallpapered walls//

Just "papered" would do fine here and avoid the repetition.

>the one that has succumbed//

Typo/verb tense.

>Liz paused for a moment and turned to look at him//

>then noticed the papers half-obscured by the donkey's hooves on the desk//
Just pointing out these two as examples. The last time we saw her, she was behind him. But the story's keeping to his perspective. So how can he see her do either of these things?

>brown and yellow feathers on her head//

Did I miss something? At the beginning, you described her as having blue and white plumage on her head.

>still drying//

Needs a hyphen.

>expecting the donkey to either be offended, or to announce that the joke was over//

Why are you jumping to her perspective now? There can be justification for doing so, but i don't see it here. This isn't vital information, her could possibly interpret her as acting this way, and you don't stay in her head long enough to make the jump meaningful.

>her expression becoming a little more annoyed//

You're getting pretty telly through this part. Describe her in a way that I can figure out she's annoyed. Don't just tell me.

>He's not going to lose his mind on my watch… she thought.//

>
>Cranky noticed the odd look she was giving him.//
This is a very abrupt change of perspective back to him.

>an annoyed expression on her face//

Besides being the same as the last time you described her, it's another spot of telly language. Look for places where the emotions are important to the story, but your narrator just tells me outright what they are instead of implying them through actions and description.

>he stammered//

This is turning up a bit much as a speaking verb, and I've only seen a couple of instances of "said." There's a section on saidisms at the top of this thread that explains the rationale, but the short version is that you don't want your choice of seapking verbs to draw attention away from the speech itself.

>her tone half-sarcastic, but also showing genuine interest//

This is a big conclusion on his part. What might he see that gave him this impression? That's what you need to be writing. There's a longer explanation in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Her words didn't seem to just bounce off this time.//

This smacks of being back in her perspective, as I can't fathom what it would mean to him.

>Liz decided not to speak this time.//

This sentence is fine, as he could reasonably think this about her, but the rest of the paragraph has hopped back to her perspective. A lot of the narration for several paragraphs in both directions is pretty neutral, so it could be that you do want to go over to her here. At least you're not flipping back and forth, but you do occasionally need to remind the reader whose shoulder he's looking over, so sprinkle in the odd comment here and there to establish that.

>that he has lost//

Typo/verb tense.

>His smug expression//

He's described as such often enough that it's standing out to me as repetitive.

>Bastion suspected some kind of followup was left unsaid.//

And now you're cutting over to him?

You hyped up his decision to leave Ponyville as something important to his current life and mindset, and he teases Liz with that fact, yet we never get the slightest implication as to why he did. It leaves things feeling incomplete.

I usually go into more of a discussion at the end, but there's not much to say here. The problems are simply stated. The core of the writing was good, and Liz's character was well developed, but there's a bit of a disconnect between canon Cranky and this one, apparently brought about by his later time in Ponyville and decision to move away, but we never get any insight to that, so it's not consistent or explained. The writing itself can get repetitive at times, telly in inappropriate places, a bit too fancy with the speaking actions, and jumpy on perspective.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blue and white plumage, the former color covering her head and chest with a few blue streaks through it//</span><br />So her head and chest are blue with blue streaks? I don&#039;t get it…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while the latter coating her forelegs and wings//</span><br />Verb form. I&#039;ll also say that since the narration takes Cranky&#039;s perspective, it&#039;s odd to get this detailed description of her appearance. He&#039;s seen her plenty of times before, so why is it catching his notice now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One already lost almost all of its leaves//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She jabbed him gently in the side, then turned around and walked to the other side of the room.//</span><br />Look how often you&#039;ve already used this &quot;He did one action, then another&quot; structure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;top class//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wallpapered walls//</span><br />Just &quot;papered&quot; would do fine here and avoid the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the one that has succumbed//</span><br />Typo/verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Liz paused for a moment and turned to look at him//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then noticed the papers half-obscured by the donkey&#039;s hooves on the desk//</span><br />Just pointing out these two as examples. The last time we saw her, she was behind him. But the story&#039;s keeping to his perspective. So how can he see her do either of these things?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brown and yellow feathers on her head//</span><br />Did I miss something? At the beginning, you described her as having blue and white plumage on her head.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still drying//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;expecting the donkey to either be offended, or to announce that the joke was over//</span><br />Why are you jumping to her perspective now? There can be justification for doing so, but i don&#039;t see it here. This isn&#039;t vital information, her could possibly interpret her as acting this way, and you don&#039;t stay in her head long enough to make the jump meaningful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her expression becoming a little more annoyed//</span><br />You&#039;re getting pretty telly through this part. Describe her in a way that I can figure out she&#039;s annoyed. Don&#039;t just tell me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>He&#039;s not going to lose his mind on my watch…</i> she thought.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cranky noticed the odd look she was giving him.//</span><br />This is a very abrupt change of perspective back to him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an annoyed expression on her face//</span><br />Besides being the same as the last time you described her, it&#039;s another spot of telly language. Look for places where the emotions are important to the story, but your narrator just tells me outright what they are instead of implying them through actions and description.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he stammered//</span><br />This is turning up a bit much as a speaking verb, and I&#039;ve only seen a couple of instances of &quot;said.&quot; There&#039;s a section on saidisms at the top of this thread that explains the rationale, but the short version is that you don&#039;t want your choice of seapking verbs to draw attention away from the speech itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her tone half-sarcastic, but also showing genuine interest//</span><br />This is a big conclusion on his part. What might he see that gave him this impression? That&#039;s what you need to be writing. There&#039;s a longer explanation in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her words didn&#039;t seem to just bounce off this time.//</span><br />This smacks of being back in her perspective, as I can&#039;t fathom what it would mean to him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Liz decided not to speak this time.//</span><br />This sentence is fine, as he could reasonably think this about her, but the rest of the paragraph has hopped back to her perspective. A lot of the narration for several paragraphs in both directions is pretty neutral, so it could be that you do want to go over to her here. At least you&#039;re not flipping back and forth, but you do occasionally need to remind the reader whose shoulder he&#039;s looking over, so sprinkle in the odd comment here and there to establish that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that he has lost//</span><br />Typo/verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His smug expression//</span><br />He&#039;s described as such often enough that it&#039;s standing out to me as repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bastion suspected some kind of followup was left unsaid.//</span><br />And now you&#039;re cutting over to him?<br /><br />You hyped up his decision to leave Ponyville as something important to his current life and mindset, and he teases Liz with that fact, yet we never get the slightest implication as to why he did. It leaves things feeling incomplete.<br /><br />I usually go into more of a discussion at the end, but there&#039;s not much to say here. The problems are simply stated. The core of the writing was good, and Liz&#039;s character was well developed, but there&#039;s a bit of a disconnect between canon Cranky and this one, apparently brought about by his later time in Ponyville and decision to move away, but we never get any insight to that, so it&#039;s not consistent or explained. The writing itself can get repetitive at times, telly in inappropriate places, a bit too fancy with the speaking actions, and jumpy on perspective.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 264

>>130963

This won't be quite a point-by-point reply, but rest assured all of your feedback has been noted and is being put to good use. I'm embarrassed to have made so many sloppy, amateur mistakes. I am an amateur, but that's no excuse. My hyphens, dashes, participles, and so forth are undergoing rigorous retraining.

>"Why wasn't I informed of this last night," a familiar voice asks.//

>So where's the question mark?
My prereader pointed this out elsewhere, but I failed to correct my mistake throughout. Again, sloppiness on my part.

>Instead there is rubble//

>Seems haphazard of him to cause structural damage to the castle, especially since this story isn't the type for exaggeration.
Shining's door pull was intended to be a quick reaction from a surprised and upset older brother. In hindsight, it seems like a radically violent reaction to a completely nonthreatening situation. I'll mellow it out.

>"The error was mine," I lift his face to meet mine.//

>I should be so fortunate," I turn to my brother.//
>If you transition from speech to narration, that narration has to be a speaking action. You can't just tack on any given action with a comma.
I feel like I should have known this, but I didn't. It's even in your introductory post! Thanks for pointing it out.

>O//

>Why is this capitalized?
Wiktionary says the vocative particle 'O' should be capitalized. I can only pull a few lines from the Chicago Manual of Style's website, but it seems to agree as well.

>it won't be any less stressful than the first one//

>There really wasn't any evidence of stress. If you want we to feel like that discussion was an ordeal, then you need to make their emotions come through more clearly.
Other readers have made similar comments. I'll rethink my wording here.

>So how does she feel about Prince Blueblood? And presumably there are more.

To be honest, I forgot about Blueblood while writing. I've been thinking about him though, and I've decided he's not all that relevant to Luna's situation. Her relation to Blueblood (and whoever else claims to be descended from a royal line, I assume) is incredibly distant. He may technically be related, but he's not family in any meaningful sense.

Also, the context here deals pretty specifically with Luna and Cadance. Even Shining Armor is only mentioned in reference to his relationship with Cadance. The Blueblood angle is worth remembering, but I think he's too far of an outlier to bring up here.

>Twilight and Luna's conversation is also steeped in such flowery and rehearsed language that it loses a feel of spontaneity and authenticity. Grandstanding has its place, but you're running counter to the intimate atmosphere you're trying to create here. Even if it were justified as an extension of their word games, they're not in a playful mood.

I think I see what you mean. I'll loosen them up and see how it looks.

>Regret waters Luna's eyes.//

>How would Twilight know it was regret?
Woops. I dropped the narrator ball on that one.

>I slip out of my cloak, folding it neatly and placing it beside the table Celestia set up for us.//

>Here's a common danger of participles: they signify concurrent action. So you have her removing the cloak at the same time she folds it and places it on the table. They'd logically occur in sequence, not simultaneously.
Noted, fixed, and cataloged for future reference.

>Conversing over tea is a very common thing in fanfiction. Unfortunately, so is running out of ways to say that a character takes a drink. It gets repetitive quickly. Try to work on that or have them perform different actions than enjoying their tea.

I didn't think much of hitting the repetition so hard in a relatively short section. Poor choice on my part. I'll liven up the table and shift focus a bit.

>I hadn't realized I was holding my breath//

>This is an incredibly cliched thing.
Yes. Yes it is. More on this in a moment.

>"Keep up the good work."//

>Your call, but I feel like this loses much of its impact due to the lack of any kind of reaction from Twilight. It wouldn't have to be much, but she's learned several lessons already, and I have no indication that she comes away from this meeting with anything.
I rolled the dice on the last couple lines. They didn't feel right, but I wanted to see how the story felt with a plain and abrupt end. Turns out I don't much care for it. My original draft had Twilight give a final "And from my mentor, I learned […]" line to bring the scene full circle. Proper closure feels much better. Now I know.



Would you believe that, once upon a time, I was an excellent English student? At the risk of repeating myself, I honestly appreciate all the feedback. I know a few self-styled (see, I'm learning) Grammar Nazis that wouldn't have called me out on my dash use or unsegregated participial phrases.

Storm is my first attempt at an original character with any sort of depth or history. If you have any comments about his execution as a character I'd be happy to hear them. Until then, back to editing.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130963" onclick="return highlight('130963', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130963">&gt;&gt;130963</a><br /><br />This won&#039;t be quite a point-by-point reply, but rest assured all of your feedback has been noted and is being put to good use. I&#039;m embarrassed to have made so many sloppy, amateur mistakes. I <i>am</i> an amateur, but that&#039;s no excuse. My hyphens, dashes, participles, and so forth are undergoing rigorous retraining.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Why wasn&#039;t I informed of this last night,&quot; a familiar voice asks.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So where&#039;s the question mark?</span><br />My prereader pointed this out elsewhere, but I failed to correct my mistake throughout. Again, sloppiness on my part.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Instead there is rubble//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Seems haphazard of him to cause structural damage to the castle, especially since this story isn&#039;t the type for exaggeration.</span><br />Shining&#039;s door pull was intended to be a quick reaction from a surprised and upset older brother. In hindsight, it seems like a radically violent reaction to a completely nonthreatening situation. I&#039;ll mellow it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;The error was mine,&quot; I lift his face to meet mine.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I should be so fortunate,&quot; I turn to my brother.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If you transition from speech to narration, that narration has to be a speaking action. You can&#039;t just tack on any given action with a comma.</span><br />I feel like I should have known this, but I didn&#039;t. It&#039;s even in your introductory post! Thanks for pointing it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;O//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why is this capitalized?</span><br /><a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/o#Interjection">Wiktionary</a> <span class="externallinkdomain">[en.wiktionary.org]</span> says the vocative particle &#039;O&#039; should be capitalized. I can only pull a few lines from the Chicago Manual of Style&#039;s website, but it seems to agree as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it won&#039;t be any less stressful than the first one//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There really wasn&#039;t any evidence of stress. If you want we to feel like that discussion was an ordeal, then you need to make their emotions come through more clearly.</span><br />Other readers have made similar comments. I&#039;ll rethink my wording here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So how does she feel about Prince Blueblood? And presumably there are more.</span><br />To be honest, I forgot about Blueblood while writing. I&#039;ve been thinking about him though, and I&#039;ve decided he&#039;s not all that relevant to Luna&#039;s situation. Her relation to Blueblood (and whoever else claims to be descended from a royal line, I assume) is <i>incredibly</i> distant. He may technically be related, but he&#039;s not <i>family</i> in any meaningful sense.<br /><br />Also, the context here deals pretty specifically with Luna and Cadance. Even Shining Armor is only mentioned in reference to his relationship with Cadance. The Blueblood angle is worth remembering, but I think he&#039;s too far of an outlier to bring up here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight and Luna&#039;s conversation is also steeped in such flowery and rehearsed language that it loses a feel of spontaneity and authenticity. Grandstanding has its place, but you&#039;re running counter to the intimate atmosphere you&#039;re trying to create here. Even if it were justified as an extension of their word games, they&#039;re not in a playful mood.</span><br />I think I see what you mean. I&#039;ll loosen them up and see how it looks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Regret waters Luna&#039;s eyes.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How would Twilight know it was regret?</span><br />Woops. I dropped the narrator ball on that one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I slip out of my cloak, folding it neatly and placing it beside the table Celestia set up for us.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Here&#039;s a common danger of participles: they signify concurrent action. So you have her removing the cloak at the same time she folds it and places it on the table. They&#039;d logically occur in sequence, not simultaneously.</span><br />Noted, fixed, and cataloged for future reference.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Conversing over tea is a very common thing in fanfiction. Unfortunately, so is running out of ways to say that a character takes a drink. It gets repetitive quickly. Try to work on that or have them perform different actions than enjoying their tea.</span><br />I didn&#039;t think much of hitting the repetition so hard in a relatively short section. Poor choice on my part. I&#039;ll liven up the table and shift focus a bit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hadn&#039;t realized I was holding my breath//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This is an incredibly cliched thing.</span><br />Yes. Yes it is. More on this in a moment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Keep up the good work.&quot;//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your call, but I feel like this loses much of its impact due to the lack of any kind of reaction from Twilight. It wouldn&#039;t have to be much, but she&#039;s learned several lessons already, and I have no indication that she comes away from this meeting with anything.</span><br />I rolled the dice on the last couple lines. They didn&#039;t feel right, but I wanted to see how the story felt with a plain and abrupt end. Turns out I don&#039;t much care for it. My original draft had Twilight give a final &quot;And from my mentor, I learned […]&quot; line to bring the scene full circle. Proper closure feels much better. Now I know.<br /><br /><br /><br />Would you believe that, once upon a time, I was an excellent English student? At the risk of repeating myself, I honestly appreciate all the feedback. I know a few self-styled (see, I&#039;m learning) Grammar Nazis that wouldn&#039;t have called me out on my dash use or unsegregated participial phrases.<br /><br />Storm is my first attempt at an original character with any sort of depth or history. If you have any comments about his execution as a character I&#039;d be happy to hear them. Until then, back to editing.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 265

>>131006
>Wiktionary says the vocative particle 'O' should be capitalized.
I wondered if that was the case, but I didn't go to look it up, so you win. This time…

>Proper closure feels much better.

It does, but proper closure can take many forms. I get what you were trying to do with the ending, and over-explaining it would definitely be worse than letting the reader invent Twilight's reaction. Something nice and subtle should do the trick here.

>Would you believe that, once upon a time, I was an excellent English student?

Actually, I would, because a lot of the finer points here are things too far in depth to cover in high school or the standard required college courses, which focus more on reading and formal writing than creative writing. I enjoyed the story, and I didn't have any complaints about the characters or plot needing significant rethinking, so the things that need fixing here are fortunately easy. This story is much better than the vast majority of what we get.

>Storm is my first attempt at an original character with any sort of depth or history.

I have to confess that it's been a long enough time since I read the story that I don't remember him. Don't take that as a strike against him. I just review so many that it's hard to remember details about any individual ones for more than a few days. However, I didn't point out any problems with him, so he must have seemed fine to me.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131006" onclick="return highlight('131006', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131006">&gt;&gt;131006</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wiktionary says the vocative particle &#039;O&#039; should be capitalized.</span><br />I wondered if that was the case, but I didn&#039;t go to look it up, so you win. This time…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Proper closure feels much better.</span><br />It does, but proper closure can take many forms. I get what you were trying to do with the ending, and over-explaining it would definitely be worse than letting the reader invent Twilight&#039;s reaction. Something nice and subtle should do the trick here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Would you believe that, once upon a time, I was an excellent English student?</span><br />Actually, I would, because a lot of the finer points here are things too far in depth to cover in high school or the standard required college courses, which focus more on reading and formal writing than creative writing. I enjoyed the story, and I didn&#039;t have any complaints about the characters or plot needing significant rethinking, so the things that need fixing here are fortunately easy. This story is much better than the vast majority of what we get.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Storm is my first attempt at an original character with any sort of depth or history.</span><br />I have to confess that it&#039;s been a long enough time since I read the story that I don&#039;t remember him. Don&#039;t take that as a strike against him. I just review so many that it&#039;s hard to remember details about any individual ones for more than a few days. However, I didn&#039;t point out any problems with him, so he must have seemed fine to me.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 266

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First off, I'll say that more mistakes are allowable in this type of format. A narrator shouldn't be misspelling words, for instance, but these are transcriptions of something a child has written, so it would understandably have some mistakes in it. I'll point out what I consider excessive, but it's certainly fine to leave some amount of these in to make it seem realistic, depending on your vision of her intellect and the care she took in writing.

Now to the review. Right off the bat, I'm put off by the use of italics. They're for making things stand out, which means there's a point where they become counterproductive. If everything stands out, then nothing does. They also get irritating to read in large amounts, like reading a story in all caps would be. For this reason, it's fine to put a letter in italics if it's reasonably short and an aberration from the bulk of the narration. Here, the letters are the entirety of the narration, so you don't need the italics to identify them as letters. The format already does that.

>“Doctor”//

Why is this capitalized?

>Dear Mommy,//

I realize it's acceptable to go without indenting the first paragraph of a story, but when there's another reson for doing so, like holding to the letter format, you should. Likewise, leave a blank line after the salutations. It makes them easier to read. Same deal with the closings, once you start using them.

>I made some new friends today. Apple Bloom and Sweetie Belle.//

In canon, Scootaloo already knew Sweetie Belle for some time before she met Apple Bloom.

>Dr. Frood says it will pass, but I don’t wanna sleep. //

She's inconsistent about setting dependent clauses off with a comma. I'm on the fence about whether she should be intermittent like this.

>It hurts.//

This is pretty mature of her to write. Without any sort of dates attached to the letters, I get no sense of how much time has passed, which is actually a pretty revelatory thing. Is she unrealistically blazing through the recovery process? Is it actually a year later, and the doctor is just saying she's making good progress to encourage her? You're kind of neglecting an avenue for providing a little additional meaning here.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, and there's no reason to think Scootaloo would draw them this way. For that matter, you might forgo the fancy-style quotation marks altogether and go with simple ones closer to handwriting.

>It made me think of your last birthday.//

This is entirely a personal impression. I don't mean to second-guess your vision of the character, but I really expected that celebrating the birthday would really give her some mixed feelings, happy for the familiarity, but saddened by the more concrete reminder that her mother isn't there.

>‘cause//

Another backward apostrophe.

>Anyway I gotta go get ready for Diamond Tiara’s party.//

Presumably this is the canon one where she actually met Apple Bloom (unless you're banking on the odd scene in the pilot episode that showed them cowering together, but that one's pretty ambiguous, while "Call of the Cutie" is pretty explicit about it).

>I got to hear how Rainbow Dash got her cutie mark.//

Yeah, if you're going to adhere to canon like this, you need to do so consistently.

>‘em//

Just sweep through for these.

>Sweetie Belle has her sister, and her parents visit from Fillydelphia every so often//

That they made a point of leaving Sweetie Belle with Rarity in "Sisterhooves Social," yet she'd been attending school all along, seems to imply that they don't live far away and that Sweetie Belle lives with them. And yet she's often shown hanging around Carousel Boutique as if she lives there. I'd say canon's pretty hard to interpret as them living that far away, which would then make the point about where Sweetie Belle's actual residence is moot, since they'd all be near each other anyway.

>workin’//

>scarin’//
This is a speech affectation. I don't believe she'd actually write it like that. There are more instances than these.

>Don’t worry Mom//

At this point, I'm really noticing how often she uses direct address. It's just unnatural. It's obvious to whom she's writing, so it goes without saying. How often would you actually do that if you were writing a letter?

>She didn’t realize what she’d done or so she says. And I guess I can kind of believe her.//

This is actually coming across as very subdued. I'm not getting a very authentic vibe from it. I can see her hearing about it, running away, and writing everything down before the feeling fades. Kids fly off the handle quickly, and while I'd normally advocate a "less is more" approach, there are times where unchecked and extreme emotion can fit. She's very raw here, and she might threaten all manner of things, like going back to the orphanage or staying with the Apples. Now, you do go through something like this here, so good there, but Scoots just sounds awfully calm in how she writes it.

>This will be the last letter//

Here's another place where the time ambiguity is working against you. If this is a couple of days later, that's way too quick for Scootaloo to so completely get over the responsibility for her mother's death. If it's quite a bit later, then it changes the picture, but it'd also be nice to have Scoots increase that sense by referencing how difficult/long a process it was.

I enjoyed the story, and the few things I think it needs aren't particularly difficult to do. Especially since you've fit it to canon, there are a few spots where it needs to dovetail better. We also need a sense of time, either through dating the letters or from Scootaloo making references to how much time has elapsed. In some of those cases, I'd recommend even adding an intermediate letter, as the transitions get quite abrupt, but that's just a recommendation, not a requirement. Scootaloo comes across as somewhat emotionally repressed, which works fine early in the story, where she's pretty numb, but when she realizes the truth about Rainbow, the whole thing's downplayed so much that it loses much of the sense that it was a big deal. Take the part where Fluttershy agreed to keep Dash away. I'm just spitballing here, but say Shy told Scoot that Dash stopped by several times a day to ask how she was doing. Such a simple thing really speaks to Dash's emotional state. How Scootaloo receives that info could go multiple directions. You get the picture. The italics, too. They're… grating.

It's a nice angle that adds something new to the old "Dash adopts Scoot" cliche, and the letter format makes it even more unusual. You actually pulled off the letters convincingly, which so many writers can't do. So please fix this up. I'd like to see it on the blog. I realize a lot of the things I've said are pretty subjective. They really are what I think would make the story better, but I'm also pragmatic about what's not worth insisting on. If you want to discuss anything or ask questions, please do. And if/when you choose to resubmit, select the "back from Mars" option.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />First off, I&#039;ll say that more mistakes are allowable in this type of format. A narrator shouldn&#039;t be misspelling words, for instance, but these are transcriptions of something a child has written, so it would understandably have some mistakes in it. I&#039;ll point out what I consider excessive, but it&#039;s certainly fine to leave some amount of these in to make it seem realistic, depending on your vision of her intellect and the care she took in writing.<br /><br />Now to the review. Right off the bat, I&#039;m put off by the use of italics. They&#039;re for making things stand out, which means there&#039;s a point where they become counterproductive. If everything stands out, then nothing does. They also get irritating to read in large amounts, like reading a story in all caps would be. For this reason, it&#039;s fine to put a letter in italics if it&#039;s reasonably short and an aberration from the bulk of the narration. Here, the letters are the entirety of the narration, so you don&#039;t need the italics to identify them as letters. The format already does that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Doctor”//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dear Mommy,//</span><br />I realize it&#039;s acceptable to go without indenting the first paragraph of a story, but when there&#039;s another reson for doing so, like holding to the letter format, you should. Likewise, leave a blank line after the salutations. It makes them easier to read. Same deal with the closings, once you start using them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I made some new friends today. Apple Bloom and Sweetie Belle.//</span><br />In canon, Scootaloo already knew Sweetie Belle for some time before she met Apple Bloom.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dr. Frood says it will pass, but I don’t wanna sleep. //</span><br />She&#039;s inconsistent about setting dependent clauses off with a comma. I&#039;m on the fence about whether she should be intermittent like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It hurts.//</span><br />This is pretty mature of her to write. Without any sort of dates attached to the letters, I get no sense of how much time has passed, which is actually a pretty revelatory thing. Is she unrealistically blazing through the recovery process? Is it actually a year later, and the doctor is just saying she&#039;s making good progress to encourage her? You&#039;re kind of neglecting an avenue for providing a little additional meaning here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, and there&#039;s no reason to think Scootaloo would draw them this way. For that matter, you might forgo the fancy-style quotation marks altogether and go with simple ones closer to handwriting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It made me think of your last birthday.//</span><br />This is entirely a personal impression. I don&#039;t mean to second-guess your vision of the character, but I really expected that celebrating the birthday would really give her some mixed feelings, happy for the familiarity, but saddened by the more concrete reminder that her mother isn&#039;t there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br />Another backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Anyway I gotta go get ready for Diamond Tiara’s party.//</span><br />Presumably this is the canon one where she actually met Apple Bloom (unless you&#039;re banking on the odd scene in the pilot episode that showed them cowering together, but that one&#039;s pretty ambiguous, while &quot;Call of the Cutie&quot; is pretty explicit about it).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I got to hear how Rainbow Dash got her cutie mark.//</span><br />Yeah, if you&#039;re going to adhere to canon like this, you need to do so consistently.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Just sweep through for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle has her sister, and her parents visit from Fillydelphia every so often//</span><br />That they made a point of leaving Sweetie Belle with Rarity in &quot;Sisterhooves Social,&quot; yet she&#039;d been attending school all along, seems to imply that they don&#039;t live far away and that Sweetie Belle lives with them. And yet she&#039;s often shown hanging around Carousel Boutique as if she lives there. I&#039;d say canon&#039;s pretty hard to interpret as them living that far away, which would then make the point about where Sweetie Belle&#039;s actual residence is moot, since they&#039;d all be near each other anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;workin’//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scarin’//</span><br />This is a speech affectation. I don&#039;t believe she&#039;d actually write it like that. There are more instances than these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t worry Mom//</span><br />At this point, I&#039;m really noticing how often she uses direct address. It&#039;s just unnatural. It&#039;s obvious to whom she&#039;s writing, so it goes without saying. How often would you actually do that if you were writing a letter?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t realize what she’d done or so she says. And I guess I can kind of believe her.//</span><br />This is actually coming across as very subdued. I&#039;m not getting a very authentic vibe from it. I can see her hearing about it, running away, and writing everything down before the feeling fades. Kids fly off the handle quickly, and while I&#039;d normally advocate a &quot;less is more&quot; approach, there are times where unchecked and extreme emotion can fit. She&#039;s very raw here, and she might threaten all manner of things, like going back to the orphanage or staying with the Apples. Now, you do go through something like this here, so good there, but Scoots just sounds awfully calm in how she writes it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This will be the last letter//</span><br />Here&#039;s another place where the time ambiguity is working against you. If this is a couple of days later, that&#039;s way too quick for Scootaloo to so completely get over the responsibility for her mother&#039;s death. If it&#039;s quite a bit later, then it changes the picture, but it&#039;d also be nice to have Scoots increase that sense by referencing how difficult/long a process it was.<br /><br />I enjoyed the story, and the few things I think it needs aren&#039;t particularly difficult to do. Especially since you&#039;ve fit it to canon, there are a few spots where it needs to dovetail better. We also need a sense of time, either through dating the letters or from Scootaloo making references to how much time has elapsed. In some of those cases, I&#039;d recommend even adding an intermediate letter, as the transitions get quite abrupt, but that&#039;s just a recommendation, not a requirement. Scootaloo comes across as somewhat emotionally repressed, which works fine early in the story, where she&#039;s pretty numb, but when she realizes the truth about Rainbow, the whole thing&#039;s downplayed so much that it loses much of the sense that it was a big deal. Take the part where Fluttershy agreed to keep Dash away. I&#039;m just spitballing here, but say Shy told Scoot that Dash stopped by several times a day to ask how she was doing. Such a simple thing really speaks to Dash&#039;s emotional state. How Scootaloo receives that info could go multiple directions. You get the picture. The italics, too. They&#039;re… grating.<br /><br />It&#039;s a nice angle that adds something new to the old &quot;Dash adopts Scoot&quot; cliche, and the letter format makes it even more unusual. You actually pulled off the letters convincingly, which so many writers can&#039;t do. So please fix this up. I&#039;d like to see it on the blog. I realize a lot of the things I&#039;ve said are pretty subjective. They really are what I think would make the story better, but I&#039;m also pragmatic about what&#039;s not worth insisting on. If you want to discuss anything or ask questions, please do. And if/when you choose to resubmit, select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 267

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“once in a millennium show.”//

Quotes or dashes are used to group multi-word modifiers, so you'd typically see this as:
“once in a millennium” show.
or
once-in-a-millennium show.

>a dower expression//

dour

>charcoal grey//

This would be hyphenated, but you already used the full color not long ago. Just calling him gray is plenty. Based on the descriptions, it wouldn't be ambiguous.

>“It has only been an hour,” Soarin’ interrupted.//

Well, no, he really didn't interrupt. And why are they speaking so formally, without contractions?

>highest ranking//

Hyphenate

I'm scanning ahead, and Thunderlane continues this very formal-sounding speech intermittently throughout the story. He doesn't speak like this in canon.

>time. The last time I was here, I didn’t have such a great time//

Watch the word repetition. Three instances of "time" in just fourteen words.

>violist//

He can identify a viola, yet later on, he doesn't know any better than to call her instrument a fiddle?

>Ayup. Princess Luna’s glamour spells really do dah trick, huh? Can’t even recognize mahself in dah mirror.//

That accent is way overwritten. The reader already knows what he sounds like. Even if he didn't, a brief description of how he sounds in the narration and a little touch here and there in the dialogue would suffice. It's more about phrasing, expressions and word choice. You don't want to make his speech hard to read.

>strong smelling//

Hyphenate compound modifiers, unless it's a two-word phrasing beginning in an -ly adverb.

>She wore a scowl somewhere between bored and annoyed.//

You have the narrator bluntly name emotion quite often. To get the reader to connect with your characters, you have to use more finesse. There's an explanation in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. And "annoyed" is one you use frequently. It's getting repetitive.

>I could really feel it in my soul.//

This sounds like an obviously lame come-on. I'm surprised she falls for it, even if he's earnest about it.

>something I imagine every pegasi dreams of//

Number mismatch. Should be "pegasus."

And now Octavia is using very formal speech patterns. It's making everything sound wooden and rehearsed.

>Hoisting the great instrument onto her back, she trotted to the steps//

A danger of participles: they imply simultaneous action. She hoists the case onto her back at the same time she's trotting to the steps. It's more logical that she'd do these in sequence, not concurrently. And as much as he talked about being dragged there by Soarin', it never occurs to him again that Soarin's might wonder where he went or be mad that he left?

>she could not hide the clear strain her body was under//

The instrument's not that heavy, and besides, as an experienced musician, she'd be used to carrying it. My instrument feels heavy now because I rarely get it out, but it sure didn't back in school, when I was carrying it to and from home every day.

>her great strength//

And yet she has trouble carrying her instrument?

>placing the fake wall back into place//

Another example of word repetition.

>She hadn’t been able to enjoy the snacks served at the Gala since she had been busy playing.//

Your narrator's pretty consistently been in Thunderlane's head, so why do you switch to hers here? I won't get into the specifics of what works and why—it's covered at the top of this thread in the section about head hopping.

>A crystal tear rolled down Octavia’s cheek.//

The single tear is a very tired cliche.

>Could I maybe stay with you?//

This is incredibly sudden. She's been on the edge of disdain the whole time, and now she wants to go home with him? When you don't give a relationship enough context, you're basically making the reader invent his own reasons as to why he should care about it. Just throwing two characters together without exploring what makes them work as a couple isn't going to make a story stand out from countless others.

>The longer I’m lead on//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>quite-“//

Please use a proper dash, and note that dashes, among other things, can break smart quotes. They're backwards.

>fit quite snuggly//

snugly

>“OK Vinyl. I really hope to see you there.”

There's nothing going on besides the dialogue here. Keep in mind that half of a conversation is nonverbal. There's an explanation at the top of this thread in the section on talking heads.

Overall, this has a number of editing issues, both mechanical (word repetition, typos) and stylistic (telly language, frequent perspective shifts). One I'll point out in particular is the sheer number of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring, as they describe something static, not active. It's impractical to remove them altogether, but it's not hard to keep them to a minimum. Of the easier ones to search on, I counted 279, which is about one every other sentence. That's how often something isn't happening.

On the storytelling side, this has very uneven action. There's the slow pacing at the beginning, then suddenly he likes her for no reason, then suddenly she drops her objections about him and asks him to stay the night. It lacks the context to characterize how they feel about each other and why, and it takes place over such a short time that it's difficult to pull that off, since they haven't even had long enough to sort it out for themselves. Then you have to get across that authenticity while still conveying confusion. It's not an easy road to go.

Incidentally, I see that a lot of these same issues were pointed out in a WRITE review you got over a year ago, and that you haven't addressed any of them. I guess it's possible that you did update some of the more abstract things, but I doubt it, given that you haven't corrected the few typos mentioned. Why not?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“once in a millennium show.”//</span><br />Quotes or dashes are used to group multi-word modifiers, so you&#039;d typically see this as:<br />“once in a millennium” show.<br />or<br />once-in-a-millennium show.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a dower expression//</span><br />dour<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;charcoal grey//</span><br />This would be hyphenated, but you already used the full color not long ago. Just calling him gray is plenty. Based on the descriptions, it wouldn&#039;t be ambiguous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“It has only been an hour,” Soarin’ interrupted.//</span><br />Well, no, he really didn&#039;t interrupt. And why are they speaking so formally, without contractions?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;highest ranking//</span><br />Hyphenate<br /><br />I&#039;m scanning ahead, and Thunderlane continues this very formal-sounding speech intermittently throughout the story. He doesn&#039;t speak like this in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;time. The last time I was here, I didn’t have such a great time//</span><br />Watch the word repetition. Three instances of &quot;time&quot; in just fourteen words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;violist//</span><br />He can identify a viola, yet later on, he doesn&#039;t know any better than to call her instrument a fiddle?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ayup. Princess Luna’s glamour spells really do dah trick, huh? Can’t even recognize mahself in dah mirror.//</span><br />That accent is way overwritten. The reader already knows what he sounds like. Even if he didn&#039;t, a brief description of how he sounds in the narration and a little touch here and there in the dialogue would suffice. It&#039;s more about phrasing, expressions and word choice. You don&#039;t want to make his speech hard to read.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;strong smelling//</span><br />Hyphenate compound modifiers, unless it&#039;s a two-word phrasing beginning in an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wore a scowl somewhere between bored and annoyed.//</span><br />You have the narrator bluntly name emotion quite often. To get the reader to connect with your characters, you have to use more finesse. There&#039;s an explanation in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. And &quot;annoyed&quot; is one you use frequently. It&#039;s getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I could really feel it in my soul.//</span><br />This sounds like an obviously lame come-on. I&#039;m surprised she falls for it, even if he&#039;s earnest about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something I imagine every pegasi dreams of//</span><br />Number mismatch. Should be &quot;pegasus.&quot;<br /><br />And now Octavia is using very formal speech patterns. It&#039;s making everything sound wooden and rehearsed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hoisting the great instrument onto her back, she trotted to the steps//</span><br />A danger of participles: they imply simultaneous action. She hoists the case onto her back at the same time she&#039;s trotting to the steps. It&#039;s more logical that she&#039;d do these in sequence, not concurrently. And as much as he talked about being dragged there by Soarin&#039;, it never occurs to him again that Soarin&#039;s might wonder where he went or be mad that he left?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she could not hide the clear strain her body was under//</span><br />The instrument&#039;s not that heavy, and besides, as an experienced musician, she&#039;d be used to carrying it. My instrument feels heavy now because I rarely get it out, but it sure didn&#039;t back in school, when I was carrying it to and from home every day.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her great strength//</span><br />And yet she has trouble carrying her instrument?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;placing the fake wall back into place//</span><br />Another example of word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She hadn’t been able to enjoy the snacks served at the Gala since she had been busy playing.//</span><br />Your narrator&#039;s pretty consistently been in Thunderlane&#039;s head, so why do you switch to hers here? I won&#039;t get into the specifics of what works and why—it&#039;s covered at the top of this thread in the section about head hopping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A crystal tear rolled down Octavia’s cheek.//</span><br />The single tear is a very tired cliche.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Could I maybe stay with you?//</span><br />This is incredibly sudden. She&#039;s been on the edge of disdain the whole time, and now she wants to go home with him? When you don&#039;t give a relationship enough context, you&#039;re basically making the reader invent his own reasons as to why he should care about it. Just throwing two characters together without exploring what makes them work as a couple isn&#039;t going to make a story stand out from countless others.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The longer I’m lead on//</span><br />The past tense of &quot;lead&quot; is &quot;led.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quite-“//</span><br />Please use a proper dash, and note that dashes, among other things, can break smart quotes. They&#039;re backwards.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fit quite snuggly//</span><br />snugly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“OK Vinyl. I really hope to see you there.”</span><br />There&#039;s nothing going on besides the dialogue here. Keep in mind that half of a conversation is nonverbal. There&#039;s an explanation at the top of this thread in the section on talking heads.<br /><br />Overall, this has a number of editing issues, both mechanical (word repetition, typos) and stylistic (telly language, frequent perspective shifts). One I&#039;ll point out in particular is the sheer number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring, as they describe something static, not active. It&#039;s impractical to remove them altogether, but it&#039;s not hard to keep them to a minimum. Of the easier ones to search on, I counted 279, which is about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something isn&#039;t happening.<br /><br />On the storytelling side, this has very uneven action. There&#039;s the slow pacing at the beginning, then suddenly he likes her for no reason, then suddenly she drops her objections about him and asks him to stay the night. It lacks the context to characterize how they feel about each other and why, and it takes place over such a short time that it&#039;s difficult to pull that off, since they haven&#039;t even had long enough to sort it out for themselves. Then you have to get across that authenticity while still conveying confusion. It&#039;s not an easy road to go.<br /><br />Incidentally, I see that a lot of these same issues were pointed out in a WRITE review you got over a year ago, and that you haven&#039;t addressed any of them. I guess it&#039;s possible that you did update some of the more abstract things, but I doubt it, given that you haven&#039;t corrected the few typos mentioned. Why not?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 268

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>whomever had found it first//

"Whoever." It's the subject of the noun clause I've copied here.

>woah//

Why do the vast majority of fanfic writers spell this wrong? It's "whoa." Pleas do a ctrl-f to catch them in all chapters.

>bloody//

I won't call this a requirement, but it's really odd to see words that an American would't use, given that canon uses American English. It'd be like a Chinese author having a character use a local idiom. Yeah, it personalizes it for him, but the canon characters wouldn't say that except in a meta sense.

>the first-chair cellist//

You forgot the comma on the back end of the appositive.

>thrice damned//

Hyphenate compound modifiers.

>damn it Rocksteady//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>in shock//

These prepositional phrases that convey an attitude or emotion are almost always redundant with information already available. In this case, it actually isn't, but it's still better to get me to intuit the emotion from her behavior and appearance than to tell me outright. There's a more general discussion in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>“Which was a miracle, believe me.”//

There's not much happening in this conversation outside of the dialogue. There are nonverbal ways of communicating, too, which often carry half of the meaning. There's a section about this under talking heads.

> Beneath them was some kind of chalk diagram//

You're using this "<descriptor> was" construction an awful lot early in chapter 2, which gets very repetitive. Not to mention that "to be" verbs are pretty boring to read, and you have 22 instances of "was" alone in the first screenful. You need to choose active verbs more often.

>“Yes, I suppose, but they said that Twilight Sparkle was in a hurry, and she’s the leader of the Element Bearers—”//

Another talking-heads conversation.

>Damn it, Newsworthy, we're not a damn tabloid!//

I don't believe for a moment that a news anchor would allow himself to swear on air like this.

>‘cause//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Please scan through for these.

>The sun shined//

"Shined" is the transitive form; it takes a direct object, like shoes or brass. You want "shone."

>mostly-harmless//

You don't need to hyphenate a two-word phrase beginning with an -ly adverb.

>an stallion//

Typo.

>his eyes shined//

shone

>My career is likely going to end today.//

This is starting to ring false. We've been given no reason to know why, other than a vague statement about throwing up on the conductor. She didn't do so on purpose, so I don't see how she'd think that'd make them fire her.

>“So,” White Streak said, as casually as if discussing the weather, “What do you think of Twilight Sparkle, hm?”//

When you pick dialogue back up again in the same sentence, don't capitalize the continuation, unless it's grammatically required to avoid something like a run-on sentence in the quote, in which case you shouldn't be continuing it anyway.

>“I think,” Octavia said, finally, “That she is a good person.//

Same deal. You get it right for other forms, but not this one. There are some examples in the section on dialogue capitalization and punctuation.

>What do you think she plans, Octavia?//

I really hope you end up playing this guy as a nut job, because I can't believe he'd be so forward about this to a stranger.

>thousands of years old//

Hyphenate all that. It's being used as a modifier.

>The same pony who Celestia raised//

Whom. Your call on whether Octavia knows that and would use it in this setting.

>far fetched//

far-fetched

>She’d seen the exhaustion on Twilight Sparkle’s face, and found a kinship in those eyes that were too tired for emotion.//

That's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>On any other day, Octavia would have simply walked away.//

You've already said something very similar to this. It feels repetitive.

>tartarus//

It's a proper noun.

>bloody tosspot//

Yeah, these British-isms just sound weird coming from canon characters. Though I suppose we've never heard Octavia speak. Maybe she is British…

>you use them to craft//

Extraneous space.

>ping//

Sound effects are frowned upon in narration. Fortunately, this is a valid word as is. Just lose the italics.

>whatever pony delivered it//

Since it's a completed action in the past, use past perfect tense: had delivered.

>first chair//

Hyphenated, in this usage, and again a few paragraphs later.

>He reached out with a hoof, and stroked Octavia’s cheek.//

No comma.

Okay, you're dropping a lot of f-bombs here. It's reasonable that she'd want to do so, but keep in mind that we're trying to appeal to a general audience here, and this is going overboard.

>then made sure that the Cello case//

Why is that capitalized?

I'll also bring up the "to be" verbs again. In chapter 3, I didn't just count instances of "was," but any forms that are easy to search for unambiguously. You have 165, which is about one every other sentence. That's how often something isn't happening.

The vast majority of these things are pretty quick, minor details. I would have sent the story up for posting now and let you fix them in the couple of days it'd probably take for it to show up on the blog, but I can't be sure you'd get to the "to be" verbs in that amount of word count by then. And please find some way to tone down the language toward the end of chapter three. Like I said, it's not an issue of realism but of trying to keep things more PG-rated for the crowd we get.

When you're ready to resubmit, please select the "back from Mars" option.

By the way, note that Seth probably won't let you keep that "Slice of Life" tag, at least on Equestria Daily. He doesn't like it in conjunction with other tags and will usually remove it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whomever had found it first//</span><br />&quot;Whoever.&quot; It&#039;s the subject of the noun clause I&#039;ve copied here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;woah//</span><br />Why do the vast majority of fanfic writers spell this wrong? It&#039;s &quot;whoa.&quot; Pleas do a ctrl-f to catch them in all chapters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bloody//</span><br />I won&#039;t call this a requirement, but it&#039;s really odd to see words that an American would&#039;t use, given that canon uses American English. It&#039;d be like a Chinese author having a character use a local idiom. Yeah, it personalizes it for him, but the canon characters wouldn&#039;t say that except in a meta sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the first-chair cellist//</span><br />You forgot the comma on the back end of the appositive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thrice damned//</span><br />Hyphenate compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;damn it Rocksteady//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in shock//</span><br />These prepositional phrases that convey an attitude or emotion are almost always redundant with information already available. In this case, it actually isn&#039;t, but it&#039;s still better to get me to intuit the emotion from her behavior and appearance than to tell me outright. There&#039;s a more general discussion in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Which was a miracle, believe me.”//</span><br />There&#039;s not much happening in this conversation outside of the dialogue. There are nonverbal ways of communicating, too, which often carry half of the meaning. There&#039;s a section about this under talking heads.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; Beneath them was some kind of chalk diagram//</span><br />You&#039;re using this &quot;&lt;descriptor&gt; was&quot; construction an awful lot early in chapter 2, which gets very repetitive. Not to mention that &quot;to be&quot; verbs are pretty boring to read, and you have 22 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone in the first screenful. You need to choose active verbs more often.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yes, I suppose, but they said that Twilight Sparkle was in a hurry, and she’s the leader of the Element Bearers—”//</span><br />Another talking-heads conversation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Damn it, Newsworthy, we&#039;re not a damn tabloid!//</span><br />I don&#039;t believe for a moment that a news anchor would allow himself to swear on air like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Please scan through for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sun shined//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is the transitive form; it takes a direct object, like shoes or brass. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mostly-harmless//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to hyphenate a two-word phrase beginning with an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an stallion//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his eyes shined//</span><br />shone<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My career is likely going to end today.//</span><br />This is starting to ring false. We&#039;ve been given no reason to know why, other than a vague statement about throwing up on the conductor. She didn&#039;t do so on purpose, so I don&#039;t see how she&#039;d think that&#039;d make them fire her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“So,” White Streak said, as casually as if discussing the weather, “What do you think of Twilight Sparkle, hm?”//</span><br />When you pick dialogue back up again in the same sentence, don&#039;t capitalize the continuation, unless it&#039;s grammatically required to avoid something like a run-on sentence in the quote, in which case you shouldn&#039;t be continuing it anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I think,” Octavia said, finally, “That she is a good person.//</span><br />Same deal. You get it right for other forms, but not this one. There are some examples in the section on dialogue capitalization and punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What do you think she plans, Octavia?//</span><br />I really hope you end up playing this guy as a nut job, because I can&#039;t believe he&#039;d be so forward about this to a stranger.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thousands of years old//</span><br />Hyphenate all that. It&#039;s being used as a modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The same pony who Celestia raised//</span><br />Whom. Your call on whether Octavia knows that and would use it in this setting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;far fetched//</span><br />far-fetched<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She’d seen the exhaustion on Twilight Sparkle’s face, and found a kinship in those eyes that were too tired for emotion.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On any other day, Octavia would have simply walked away.//</span><br />You&#039;ve already said something very similar to this. It feels repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tartarus//</span><br />It&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bloody tosspot//</span><br />Yeah, these British-isms just sound weird coming from canon characters. Though I suppose we&#039;ve never heard Octavia speak. Maybe she is British…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you use them to craft//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ping//</span><br />Sound effects are frowned upon in narration. Fortunately, this is a valid word as is. Just lose the italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whatever pony delivered it//</span><br />Since it&#039;s a completed action in the past, use past perfect tense: had delivered.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;first chair//</span><br />Hyphenated, in this usage, and again a few paragraphs later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He reached out with a hoof, and stroked Octavia’s cheek.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br />Okay, you&#039;re dropping a lot of f-bombs here. It&#039;s reasonable that she&#039;d want to do so, but keep in mind that we&#039;re trying to appeal to a general audience here, and this is going overboard.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then made sure that the Cello case//</span><br />Why is that capitalized?<br /><br />I&#039;ll also bring up the &quot;to be&quot; verbs again. In chapter 3, I didn&#039;t just count instances of &quot;was,&quot; but any forms that are easy to search for unambiguously. You have 165, which is about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something isn&#039;t happening.<br /><br />The vast majority of these things are pretty quick, minor details. I would have sent the story up for posting now and let you fix them in the couple of days it&#039;d probably take for it to show up on the blog, but I can&#039;t be sure you&#039;d get to the &quot;to be&quot; verbs in that amount of word count by then. And please find some way to tone down the language toward the end of chapter three. Like I said, it&#039;s not an issue of realism but of trying to keep things more PG-rated for the crowd we get.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><br />By the way, note that Seth probably won&#039;t let you keep that &quot;Slice of Life&quot; tag, at least on Equestria Daily. He doesn&#039;t like it in conjunction with other tags and will usually remove it.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sun, Aug 31st, 2014 20:48</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 269

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>further, and further//

No need for that comma.

>A dull ringing sound reached her ears. She twitched her ear//

Watch the close repetition of "ear."

>”BEGONE!” She screamed.//

The opening smart quotes are backward, and the dialogue tag is incorrectly capitalized. There are examples at the top of this thread under the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization.

>Queen Chrysalis stood from her sleeping position, and made her way over to the wall of her chambers where she had positioned a mirror.//

Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>dirty looking//

Hyphenate compound descriptors.

>non existent//

One word.

>a sound that echoed across the spacious hallway and into the desolate hive tunnels for miles, not a single other sound//

Close repetition of "sound."

>“ I should trust//

Extraneous space.

>The unmoving figure did not respond.//

She saw two before, but now you've narrowed it down to focusing on one. Which one is it? Without saying so, it feels more like an oversight on the author's part.

>causing the precariously mounted weapon in the guard's hooves to fall to the floor, taking the guard's leg with it//

It can be a bit clunky to stack up like elements in a sentence, as in the two participial phrases here. It'd feel smoother if you just placed an "and" instead of the comma to make it a single compound phrase.

>long dead//

Hyphenate.

>through which sunlight shone through provided the only source of light//

That second "through" is redundant. And "light" is pretty repetitive with "sunlight."

>she spat the word love with a hint of hatred//

You can't just tack any given action onto speech. It has to be a speaking action, yet this one isn't phrased as such, since there's no grammatical function left for the speech to perform. This should be a separate sentence. And put "love" in quotes.

>now empty//

Hyphenate.

>Of…of course.//

The preferred formats for ellipses are… this … this . . . or this. The exception is a leading ellipsis, which wouldn't have a space after it.

>“Or maybe, they cannot respond?” A sinister voice spoke behind Queen Chrysalis.//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses. There's no grammatical reason to have one here. And dialogue tag capitalization again.

>The owner of the voice//

This is the fourth use of "voice" in just the last six sentences.

>Her gaze was not a kind one, not even an angry one. She looked tired. Bored, maybe.//

A lot of this just plants emotional impressions in my head instead of getting me to figure them out. It's much more engaging when I interpret the character's feelings from how she looks and acts, not from what the narrator bluntly says her feelings are. There's more info on this in the section on show versus tell.

>healthy looking//

Hyphenate. But again, this would carry so much more power if instead of just saying she looked healthy, you showed me what Chrysalis notices about her that leads her to this conclusion.

>so if you don’t mind//

Comma needed after the dependent clause.

>end this,//

Another comma that has no grammatical purpose.

>Surely this lovely ‘kingdom’ can take care of itself from now on, I hardly think they require your assistance anymore.//

Comma splice.

>the other Chrysalis spat out the title with spite.//

Capitalization.

>up!

It's preferred to italicize ! or ? when on an italicized word.

I'm pointing out a lot of the same issues by now. From here on, I'll only mark new issues, not additional instances of old ones.

>Chrysalis's//

You're inconsistent about whether you add that final "s." Either version is fine, but be consistent.

>Here here//

Hear, hear.

>your majesty//

Such an honorific would be capitalized.

>Very well then you filthy mutts,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

>laid scattered//

Lay/lie confusion.

I admit to being intrigued by the ending. It's unclear whether the feather is just the quill (unlikely, since it had already been described as hitting the floor before she fell), something from a scavenging bird just waiting for her to die, or one from a newly arrived Princess Celestia. I suspect you want it to be ambiguous like this.

The story hangs together well. The only thing consistently wrong is that you need help with the editing. I've pointed out all the types of mistakes I saw, but not all the instances of such. Please find an individual or a review group, such as those in the Omnibus linked at the top of this page, who can help you iron this out. It's one I'd eventually like to see featured.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;further, and further//</span><br />No need for that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A dull ringing sound reached her ears. She twitched her ear//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;ear.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;”BEGONE!” She screamed.//</span><br />The opening smart quotes are backward, and the dialogue tag is incorrectly capitalized. There are examples at the top of this thread under the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Queen Chrysalis stood from her sleeping position, and made her way over to the wall of her chambers where she had positioned a mirror.//</span><br />Also see the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dirty looking//</span><br />Hyphenate compound descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;non existent//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a sound that echoed across the spacious hallway and into the desolate hive tunnels for miles, not a single other sound//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;sound.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“ I should trust//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The unmoving figure did not respond.//</span><br />She saw two before, but now you&#039;ve narrowed it down to focusing on one. Which one is it? Without saying so, it feels more like an oversight on the author&#039;s part.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;causing the precariously mounted weapon in the guard&#039;s hooves to fall to the floor, taking the guard&#039;s leg with it//</span><br />It can be a bit clunky to stack up like elements in a sentence, as in the two participial phrases here. It&#039;d feel smoother if you just placed an &quot;and&quot; instead of the comma to make it a single compound phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long dead//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;through which sunlight shone through provided the only source of light//</span><br />That second &quot;through&quot; is redundant. And &quot;light&quot; is pretty repetitive with &quot;sunlight.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she spat the word love with a hint of hatred//</span><br />You can&#039;t just tack any given action onto speech. It has to be a speaking action, yet this one isn&#039;t phrased as such, since there&#039;s no grammatical function left for the speech to perform. This should be a separate sentence. And put &quot;love&quot; in quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now empty//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Of…of course.//</span><br />The preferred formats for ellipses are… this … this . . . or this. The exception is a leading ellipsis, which wouldn&#039;t have a space after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Or maybe, they cannot respond?” A sinister voice spoke behind Queen Chrysalis.//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses. There&#039;s no grammatical reason to have one here. And dialogue tag capitalization again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The owner of the voice//</span><br />This is the fourth use of &quot;voice&quot; in just the last six sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her gaze was not a kind one, not even an angry one. She looked tired. Bored, maybe.//</span><br />A lot of this just plants emotional impressions in my head instead of getting me to figure them out. It&#039;s much more engaging when I interpret the character&#039;s feelings from how she looks and acts, not from what the narrator bluntly says her feelings are. There&#039;s more info on this in the section on show versus tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;healthy looking//</span><br />Hyphenate. But again, this would carry so much more power if instead of just saying she looked healthy, you showed me what Chrysalis notices about her that leads her to this conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so if you don’t mind//</span><br />Comma needed after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;end this,//</span><br />Another comma that has no grammatical purpose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Surely this lovely ‘kingdom’ can take care of itself from now on, I hardly think they require your assistance anymore.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the other Chrysalis spat out the title with spite.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>up</i>!</span><br />It&#039;s preferred to italicize ! or ? when on an italicized word.<br /><br />I&#039;m pointing out a lot of the same issues by now. From here on, I&#039;ll only mark new issues, not additional instances of old ones.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chrysalis&#039;s//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent about whether you add that final &quot;s.&quot; Either version is fine, but be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Here here//</span><br />Hear, hear.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your majesty//</span><br />Such an honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Very well then you filthy mutts,//</span><br />In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laid scattered//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br />I admit to being intrigued by the ending. It&#039;s unclear whether the feather is just the quill (unlikely, since it had already been described as hitting the floor before she fell), something from a scavenging bird just waiting for her to die, or one from a newly arrived Princess Celestia. I suspect you want it to be ambiguous like this.<br /><br />The story hangs together well. The only thing consistently wrong is that you need help with the editing. I&#039;ve pointed out all the types of mistakes I saw, but not all the instances of such. Please find an individual or a review group, such as those in the Omnibus linked at the top of this page, who can help you iron this out. It&#039;s one I&#039;d eventually like to see featured.<br />

TGMCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 270

>>131018
Thank you for the review. I'll look over what you mentioned, fix it up and re-submit asap<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131018" onclick="return highlight('131018', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131018">&gt;&gt;131018</a><br />Thank you for the review. I&#039;ll look over what you mentioned, fix it up and re-submit asap<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 271

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A school is very much a place of distinct contrasts, I muse to myself as I tread slowly and quietly along the darkened halls of my School for Gifted Unicorns; the gentle golden glow of my horn-light the only real source of illumination to guide my steps.//

There's no independent clause after the semicolon, and one really does suggest a formalism of structure. I'd also recommend substituting another word or phrase for the first instance of "school" to avoid the repetition.

>Upcoming tests, all-too-rapidly approaching due dates on assignments; even the simple longing for the seemingly distant weekend, or, in some cases, that all-too-distant closing bell.//

Same deal with the semicolon, and those "all-too-" phrasings get repetitive. Maybe you meant them to be, but then you have to make it obvious by calling attention to it. You could bring in a third instance or make the narrator self-aware of the repetition by using a word like "again" somewhere, for example.

>The walls are lined with portraits, painted and photographed, of students, teachers, and principals that have come before; in some instances they are one in the same pony, their images separated by only the brief span of passing decades.//

You're having consistent problems with semicolons, so I wanted to point out one done right. If you replaced it with a period, both resulting sentences would be complete. The phrase is "one and the same."

>But, I do not leave//

It is rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one is not.

>born of equal parts frustration and exhaustion//

>practice born of dozens of lifetimes//
Coming just a few sentences apart, these are repetitive.

>access,” I pause to raise an eyebrow//

You can't just tack any given action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action.

>The colour in her cheeks becomes more intense and she averts her gaze from mine.//

You do this in a number of places, too. Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. There are exceptions for flow, particularly when you need to differentiate between the functions of multiple conjunctions, but for the most part, this is how they are handled.

>course work//

One word.

>Finding none, I see the resolve in her eyes waver and crumble.//

Dangling participle. "Finding none" is supposed to describe Twilight, but she doesn't appear in the sentence at all, much less in proximity to the participle. It explicitly describes Celestia here.

>It all started after I started//

Repetitive.

>six can//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>little filly’s room//

It's generally rendered in the plural, i.e., "little fillies' room."

>in focus//

Hyphenate.

>straight forward//

straightforward

>further - she//

Please use a proper dash.

>over-flowing//

overflowing

> questions,” the words bubbled out from among the stream of liquid unhappiness that overflows anew from whatever dam had been holding it in check whilst I read.//

Another non-speaking action attached to a quote with a comma. And at this point, I notice you went into past tense somewhere. I'm not scrolling back to find out, but why did you switch? There's no obvious stylistic reason, so if you intended there to be one, it's lost on me.

>She blinks rapidly//

Missing line break.

>I cut her short//

She ended on an ellipsis, which is trailing off, not getting cut off. If that's the effect you want, use a dash. And then the cutoff is obvious from the punctuation; you don't need to narrate it as well.

>- and night -//

Proper dashes, please.

>The expression on her face is truly heartwarming//

Then why don't I get to see it?

>general detritus of Twilight’s studying//

It was described with an almost identical phrasing when she first entered the room. Try to use something different.

>- and your ego -//

Dashes.

>with all traces of mirth removed//

More unusual words stand out when repeated, and you just used "mirth" in reference to Celestia.

>drawn out//

Hyphenate.

>You know me - busy, busy, busy!//

Dash.

The story itself is very cute and clever. I would love to see it on the blog. Really, the only issue is a number of really rankling mechanical problems, notably the aforementioned comma use with conjunctions, dash/hyphen use, and semicolons. That last one in particular was particularly vexing for a couple of reasons.

First, while there can be some leeway given for stylistic use, the semicolon suggests a formal structure and organization of thought that do not mesh well with misuse, so I would really encourage you not to use them with only sentence fragments on one side or the other. They really do need independent clauses on both sides, except where they're used in a superlist. A lot of the ones you have could be replaced by dashes.

Second, the sheer number of them serves to call attention to themselves as a writing tic. You want the reader paying attention to the story, events, characters, and flow, not the minutiae of the mechanics. Part of that is getting the mechanics right so the reader doesn't hit any speed bumps, and part of it is not doing something in the writing that stands out and draws attention to the black lines and dots on the page instead of the world in his head. In addition to the plenitude of semicolons, there was a tendency to stack up multiple ones in single sentences at times, which just ends up making the sentence feel choppy, again except for use in a superlist.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A school is very much a place of distinct contrasts, I muse to myself as I tread slowly and quietly along the darkened halls of my School for Gifted Unicorns; the gentle golden glow of my horn-light the only real source of illumination to guide my steps.//</span><br />There&#039;s no independent clause after the semicolon, and one really does suggest a formalism of structure. I&#039;d also recommend substituting another word or phrase for the first instance of &quot;school&quot; to avoid the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Upcoming tests, all-too-rapidly approaching due dates on assignments; even the simple longing for the seemingly distant weekend, or, in some cases, that all-too-distant closing bell.//</span><br />Same deal with the semicolon, and those &quot;all-too-&quot; phrasings get repetitive. Maybe you meant them to be, but then you have to make it obvious by calling attention to it. You could bring in a third instance or make the narrator self-aware of the repetition by using a word like &quot;again&quot; somewhere, for example.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The walls are lined with portraits, painted and photographed, of students, teachers, and principals that have come before; in some instances they are one in the same pony, their images separated by only the brief span of passing decades.//</span><br />You&#039;re having consistent problems with semicolons, so I wanted to point out one done right. If you replaced it with a period, both resulting sentences would be complete. The phrase is &quot;one and the same.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But, I do not leave//</span><br />It is rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one is not.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;born of equal parts frustration and exhaustion//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;practice born of dozens of lifetimes//</span><br />Coming just a few sentences apart, these are repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;access,” I pause to raise an eyebrow//</span><br />You can&#039;t just tack any given action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The colour in her cheeks becomes more intense and she averts her gaze from mine.//</span><br />You do this in a number of places, too. Check out the section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. There are exceptions for flow, particularly when you need to differentiate between the functions of multiple conjunctions, but for the most part, this is how they are handled.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;course work//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Finding none, I see the resolve in her eyes waver and crumble.//</span><br />Dangling participle. &quot;Finding none&quot; is supposed to describe Twilight, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the sentence at all, much less in proximity to the participle. It explicitly describes Celestia here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It all started after I started//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;six can//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;little filly’s room//</span><br />It&#039;s generally rendered in the plural, i.e., &quot;little fillies&#039; room.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in focus//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;straight forward//</span><br />straightforward<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;further - she//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;over-flowing//</span><br />overflowing<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; questions,” the words bubbled out from among the stream of liquid unhappiness that overflows anew from whatever dam had been holding it in check whilst I read.//</span><br />Another non-speaking action attached to a quote with a comma. And at this point, I notice you went into past tense somewhere. I&#039;m not scrolling back to find out, but why did you switch? There&#039;s no obvious stylistic reason, so if you intended there to be one, it&#039;s lost on me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She blinks rapidly//</span><br />Missing line break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I cut her short//</span><br />She ended on an ellipsis, which is trailing off, not getting cut off. If that&#039;s the effect you want, use a dash. And then the cutoff is obvious from the punctuation; you don&#039;t need to narrate it as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- and night -//</span><br />Proper dashes, please.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The expression on her face is truly heartwarming//</span><br />Then why don&#039;t I get to see it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;general detritus of Twilight’s studying//</span><br />It was described with an almost identical phrasing when she first entered the room. Try to use something different.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- and your ego -//</span><br />Dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with all traces of mirth removed//</span><br />More unusual words stand out when repeated, and you just used &quot;mirth&quot; in reference to Celestia.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;drawn out//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You know me - busy, busy, busy!//</span><br />Dash.<br /><br />The story itself is very cute and clever. I would love to see it on the blog. Really, the only issue is a number of really rankling mechanical problems, notably the aforementioned comma use with conjunctions, dash/hyphen use, and semicolons. That last one in particular was particularly vexing for a couple of reasons.<br /><br />First, while there can be some leeway given for stylistic use, the semicolon suggests a formal structure and organization of thought that do not mesh well with misuse, so I would really encourage you not to use them with only sentence fragments on one side or the other. They really do need independent clauses on both sides, except where they&#039;re used in a superlist. A lot of the ones you have could be replaced by dashes.<br /><br />Second, the sheer number of them serves to call attention to themselves as a writing tic. You want the reader paying attention to the story, events, characters, and flow, not the minutiae of the mechanics. Part of that is getting the mechanics right so the reader doesn&#039;t hit any speed bumps, and part of it is not doing something in the writing that stands out and draws attention to the black lines and dots on the page instead of the world in his head. In addition to the plenitude of semicolons, there was a tendency to stack up multiple ones in single sentences at times, which just ends up making the sentence feel choppy, again except for use in a superlist.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 272

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Sometimes I don’t reckon time’s even passing at all.

>
>But I know it is. As the months pass//
Watch the close repetition of "pass."

>I’ve been doing it all myself//

Why in the world is she harvesting more than she needs for herself? And even if she did, I'd think she'd comment on how much of it goes to waste.

>Soon I was surrounding by the orange//

Verb form.

In chapter 1, you use "I" 57 times in only 855 words and 58 sentences. And 27 of those 58 sentences start with "I." The frequency of the word itself is not so much of an issue, since it's natural to use it so much in a first-person narration and she's the only character, but that's still pushing it. More to the point, "I" starts 27 of those sentences, just two shy of half. That makes or a pretty repetitive sentence structure.

>color spread out before me like somepony had spilled a paint can of every color//

Close repetition of "color."

>Our eyes met, and for a long moment, I couldn’t tear my eyes away.//

Close repetition of "eyes."

>“But—“//

Dashes can break smart quotes. Your closing qutoes are backward.

>real…what//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>When I was several yards from the front door//

Comma needed for the dependent clause.

>There’s somethin’ outside and it looks like it’s hurt pretty bad!//

Comma between the clauses.

>I was born here at Sweet Apple Acres and I’ve lived and worked here with Granny//

Comma between the clauses.

>Then she went on to destroy every last pony in Equestria.//

Seeing as they need ponies for their food source, how is this a viable strategy? And how is this even a feasible punishment? Mobilizing an entire nation and accepting whatever casualties may occur just to spite one changeling?

>replaced your memories with those of the Apple pony//

The changeling was assigned there, after all—she must have had some unsavory intent toward them originally. How id the Apples reconcile this with caring for her, and how or why would they keep it secret from any other ponies?

>“So all this happened—“//

Broken smart quotes again.

>the sky was the brightest of blues and sunshine streamed down from above//

Comma between the clauses.

>I opened a crate full of cider that had been distilled during the previous winter, and began to pack my saddlebags with the cold bottles.//

As a contrast, this is all one clause, so you don't need the comma.

Chapters 2 and 3 had improved, but in chapter 4, we're back to having an awful lot of sentences beginning with "I."

>I opened another bottle.//

Can changelings drink? It doesn't actually give them sustenance, but I guess that doesn't mean they can't. But what's she actually been eating all along?

>I unsuccessfully tried to shake it off, and headed downstairs for breakfast.//

Single clause, no comma.

>I went into town//

Third instance of "into town" in just five sentences.

>“Pinkie Pie!” I shouted, pounding on the door.//

All but one of your dialogue attributions in this chapter have this same structure: "Quote," she said, performing another action. I haven't gone back to recheck previous chapter for this, but it's likely a problem you carried throughout the story.

>I raced to the Carousel Boutique.//

You don't use "the" unless it's part of the official name, and then it'd be capitalized anyway. You use "the" for generic names. For instance, you go to the store, but you go to Wal-Mart.

>‘cause//

Smart quotes also get leading apostrophes backward. It happens again a little later.

>apparen’ly I ain’t a pony neither. I can’t go on like this! What’m I s’posed t’ do?//

Applejack wasn't that bad earlier in the story, but this is just too much. Her accent is overwritten. The reader knows how she sounds and will fill that in for you. Even if she were an OC, you only have to describe how she sounds once, and then the reader gets it. It's more about word choice and phrasing. You don't want to make her dialogue difficult to read.

>the soft fur of her chest. I could feel the beating of her heart and the gentle rise and fall of her chest//

Close repetition of "chest."

>Changeling-Dash looked at me, and then we both took off running.//

There's nothing to read from that look. Even if it's blank, that carries some meaning, but I'm getting nothing here.

>who looked at me and smiled//

At least I'm getting more of an indication of her mood here, but it's repetitive, coming just a few sentences later.

I see that you'd responded to the extinction of their food source in the comments for chapter 4, but this is a big enough thing that you can't just gloss it over. Too many authors choose AU as a way to do something different, but then expect readers to accept that at face value without attempting an explanation. If it's a different universe, I need to know how it works. If it branches off from canon, I need to know how we get there.

To address your points:
1 and 3: Chrysalis had stored up a reserve of love or just failed to realize what she was doing. Both of these just speak to a massive lack of planning, and yet her strategy here (and in "A Canterlot Wedding," for that matter), was very calculated and set into motion long in advance. The fact that she would then fail to see that she'd eliminated her food supply is in stark contradiction to that.
2: Changelings don't feed off of love in this universe. First, that's worldbuilding that we'd need to know. Second, why would it have taken the catalyst of a single desertion to set these events into motion? If she had the military might to wipe ponies out so easily, as well as a burning hatred of them, why wouldn't she have done so long ago? Or why bide her time for a sudden invasion? Why wouldn't she have conducted an ongoing campaign against them?

It's also curious that Applejack never questions Dash's decision to stay the night, especially since Dash had already expressed reservations about being missed from the Hive.

The emotions here are genuine—it's more that they blow by so quickly as to lose some of their power. Her emotional arc from thinking she's a pony to accepting she's a changeling takes multiple chapters, but her friendship with this other changeling deserves a little more meat to it. Even this other character—we don't get much of a sense of how much turmoil this is causing her. She cries a bit, but it's hard to read exactly what that means. Just some small default sadness, like she might have for an acquaintance's pet, or is this really tearing her up inside. Does she state matter-of-factly that she can't leave the Hive, or does she barely get it out, trying to convince herself as much as Applejack. Invest you climax with some real, solid emotional context all around, as you could have something here. Besides that and the suspension of disbelief regarding Chrysalis's strategy here, this is a good story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sometimes I don’t reckon time’s even passing at all.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But I know it is. As the months pass//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;pass.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve been doing it all myself//</span><br />Why in the world is she harvesting more than she needs for herself? And even if she did, I&#039;d think she&#039;d comment on how much of it goes to waste.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Soon I was surrounding by the orange//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br />In chapter 1, you use &quot;I&quot; 57 times in only 855 words and 58 sentences. And 27 of those 58 sentences start with &quot;I.&quot; The frequency of the word itself is not so much of an issue, since it&#039;s natural to use it so much in a first-person narration and she&#039;s the only character, but that&#039;s still pushing it. More to the point, &quot;I&quot; starts 27 of those sentences, just two shy of half. That makes or a pretty repetitive sentence structure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;color spread out before me like somepony had spilled a paint can of every color//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;color.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Our eyes met, and for a long moment, I couldn’t tear my eyes away.//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;eyes.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“But—“//</span><br />Dashes can break smart quotes. Your closing qutoes are backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;real…what//</span><br />Leave a space after the ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I was several yards from the front door//</span><br />Comma needed for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There’s somethin’ outside and it looks like it’s hurt pretty bad!//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was born here at Sweet Apple Acres and I’ve lived and worked here with Granny//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then she went on to destroy every last pony in Equestria.//</span><br />Seeing as they need ponies for their food source, how is this a viable strategy? And how is this even a feasible punishment? Mobilizing an entire nation and accepting whatever casualties may occur just to spite one changeling?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;replaced your memories with those of the Apple pony//</span><br />The changeling was assigned there, after all—she must have had some unsavory intent toward them originally. How id the Apples reconcile this with caring for her, and how or why would they keep it secret from any other ponies?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“So all this happened—“//</span><br />Broken smart quotes again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the sky was the brightest of blues and sunshine streamed down from above//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I opened a crate full of cider that had been distilled during the previous winter, and began to pack my saddlebags with the cold bottles.//</span><br />As a contrast, this is all one clause, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br />Chapters 2 and 3 had improved, but in chapter 4, we&#039;re back to having an awful lot of sentences beginning with &quot;I.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I opened another bottle.//</span><br />Can changelings drink? It doesn&#039;t actually give them sustenance, but I guess that doesn&#039;t mean they can&#039;t. But what&#039;s she actually been eating all along?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I unsuccessfully tried to shake it off, and headed downstairs for breakfast.//</span><br />Single clause, no comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I went into town//</span><br />Third instance of &quot;into town&quot; in just five sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Pinkie Pie!” I shouted, pounding on the door.//</span><br />All but one of your dialogue attributions in this chapter have this same structure: &quot;Quote,&quot; she said, performing another action. I haven&#039;t gone back to recheck previous chapter for this, but it&#039;s likely a problem you carried throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I raced to the Carousel Boutique.//</span><br />You don&#039;t use &quot;the&quot; unless it&#039;s part of the official name, and then it&#039;d be capitalized anyway. You use &quot;the&quot; for generic names. For instance, you go to the store, but you go to Wal-Mart.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br />Smart quotes also get leading apostrophes backward. It happens again a little later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;apparen’ly I ain’t a pony neither. I can’t go on like this! What’m I s’posed t’ do?//</span><br />Applejack wasn&#039;t that bad earlier in the story, but this is just too much. Her accent is overwritten. The reader knows how she sounds and will fill that in for you. Even if she were an OC, you only have to describe how she sounds once, and then the reader gets it. It&#039;s more about word choice and phrasing. You don&#039;t want to make her dialogue difficult to read.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the soft fur of her chest. I could feel the beating of her heart and the gentle rise and fall of her chest//</span><br />Close repetition of &quot;chest.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Changeling-Dash looked at me, and then we both took off running.//</span><br />There&#039;s nothing to read from that look. Even if it&#039;s blank, that carries some meaning, but I&#039;m getting nothing here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who looked at me and smiled//</span><br />At least I&#039;m getting more of an indication of her mood here, but it&#039;s repetitive, coming just a few sentences later.<br /><br />I see that you&#039;d responded to the extinction of their food source in the comments for chapter 4, but this is a big enough thing that you can&#039;t just gloss it over. Too many authors choose AU as a way to do something different, but then expect readers to accept that at face value without attempting an explanation. If it&#039;s a different universe, I need to know how it works. If it branches off from canon, I need to know how we get there.<br /><br />To address your points:<br />1 and 3: Chrysalis had stored up a reserve of love or just failed to realize what she was doing. Both of these just speak to a massive lack of planning, and yet her strategy here (and in &quot;A Canterlot Wedding,&quot; for that matter), was very calculated and set into motion long in advance. The fact that she would then fail to see that she&#039;d eliminated her food supply is in stark contradiction to that.<br />2: Changelings don&#039;t feed off of love in this universe. First, that&#039;s worldbuilding that we&#039;d need to know. Second, why would it have taken the catalyst of a single desertion to set these events into motion? If she had the military might to wipe ponies out so easily, as well as a burning hatred of them, why wouldn&#039;t she have done so long ago? Or why bide her time for a sudden invasion? Why wouldn&#039;t she have conducted an ongoing campaign against them?<br /><br />It&#039;s also curious that Applejack never questions Dash&#039;s decision to stay the night, especially since Dash had already expressed reservations about being missed from the Hive.<br /><br />The emotions here are genuine—it&#039;s more that they blow by so quickly as to lose some of their power. Her emotional arc from thinking she&#039;s a pony to accepting she&#039;s a changeling takes multiple chapters, but her friendship with this other changeling deserves a little more meat to it. Even this other character—we don&#039;t get much of a sense of how much turmoil this is causing her. She cries a bit, but it&#039;s hard to read exactly what that means. Just some small default sadness, like she might have for an acquaintance&#039;s pet, or is this really tearing her up inside. Does she state matter-of-factly that she can&#039;t leave the Hive, or does she barely get it out, trying to convince herself as much as Applejack. Invest you climax with some real, solid emotional context all around, as you could have something here. Besides that and the suspension of disbelief regarding Chrysalis&#039;s strategy here, this is a good story.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 273

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>egregiously-high//

Two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb don't use hyphens.

>Celestia deflated a little as she shifted to a more comfortable position on her chair, and buried her face in a hoof.//

That's all one clause; you don't need the comma.

>As the advisor made her leave//

"Took her leave," yes? Otherwise, it makes it sound like the advisor forced Celestia to leave.

>My burst channel is ten thousand vortices//

I have zero idea what this is supposed to mean. Is that a lot? Does it mean raw power? An ability to multitask? Without knowing it's meaningless filler.

>for princesses sakes//

That would be a possessive.

>“Shining always said he wished he had more unicorns that could learn more than a couple advanced spells.” Her voice cracked a little as she spoke, but she managed to be firm.//

The last female mentioned is Twilight's mther, so the presumption is that this all refers to her. I think you meant Twilight, though.

>Twilight Sparkle couldn’t help but glance across her parents’ kitchen//

>hoping Twilight Sparkle would see reason//
It's usually a good idea to keep your perspective consistent or make shifts in points of view smoothly. But here are two sentences in the same paragraph which are said from different perspectives. Only Twilight would know what she couldn't help doing, and only Velvet would know what she hoped, unless you couch one or both as the way another character perceives them. There's a more detailed explanation at the top of this thread in the section on head hopping.

>But, what’s done is done.//

It's rare that commas after conjunctions are correctly used. This one is not. Commas aren't for dramatic pauses.

>and eventually managed to convince them that she wasn’t actively committing suicide by enlisting//

Isn't this the real emotional high point of the chapter? Why are you glossing it over?

A word about "to be" verbs: boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. It's not practical to remove them altogether, but their use can be minimized. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 51 in the first chapter alone, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. You need to choose more active verbs.

>Twilight gathered her magic, and magical energy lanced through the target, a little less than 3 inches away from the center.//

The use of "magic" and "magical" is fairly repetitive here, and please write out numbers that short.

>then asked for a few more shots with similar results//

As phrased, it sounds like he asked for similar results. A comma before "with" might fix it, but it still sounds a little off.

>the proctor remembered to close his jaw //

Jumpy perspectives again.

>He trotted over to an unused station, and brought over its weights.//

Another spot where you don't need the comma. There's also a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of the thread.

>and laid down on the only bench//

Lay/lie confusion.

>“Cast a silencing spell on the gramophone.”//

Why go through the rigmarole of getting out a record player? Why not just have her silence him tapping a hoof on the table or another pony?

>so we now I know//

Jumbled wording.

>Twilight poured as much power as she could draw into her horn.//

Pretty repetitive with the description of what the proctor told her to do.

>“You are officially Private Twilight Sparkle in Their Majesties’ Royal Guard.”//

I guess I can't assume that this military would operate like Earth ones, but any recruit showing that kind of aptitude would immediately be sent to Officer Candidate School. In fact, as a graduate of the princesses' academy, she should have been routed that way by default.

>your majesty//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>less savory//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>but if they didn’t laugh, they risked the disfavor of the pony saying it//

I can't identify whose perspective this is. Luna's, in interpreting their actions somehow? The collective mind of that group? It's a little off-putting to winder where this is coming from.

>Perhaps I should try that more often.//

Isn't this in direct contradiction to her attitude at the beginning of the story?

>A bell above the door chimed pleasantly as Twilight walked into the shop.//

I'd encourage you to put another line break after the scene separators. It looks like an errant overstrike as is.

>Rarity’s sentence trailed off//

You don't need to narrate this. It's already apparent from the punctuation.

>not entirely sure what she was looking at//

Watch that perspective.

>jeweler’s loop//

loupe

>In fact, now that I think about it, I must insist that it be free of charge!//

This is so convenient as to be contrived. Going from 500 to "free, and I won't take no for an answer."

>you could provide my sister and myself//

Reflexive pronouns are for when the antecedent is the subject. "Me" is appropriate here.

>Twilight’s tried to think of something//

Typo.

>been enough//

>edges. The//
Extraneous spaces.

>head first//

headfirst

This battle scene is very… clinical. It's very factual but short on the emotions involved. While this might work if you had adopted an objective narration from the beginning, once you've set limited narration as a consistent tone, it ends up making this feel bland and disconnected from the characters experiencing it.

For example. take the part where Twilight feels the heat of the dragon's breath coming around her improvised rock shield. She's very businesslike and calmly starts planning out her next move. She doesn't wipe the sweat from her face, have second thoughts about the huge reptile towering over her, worry for the safety of that pegasus who's having trouble flying around the dragon. It's just fact after fact after fact. Pay attention to the rhythm as well. Most of the sentences around here are fairly long, with multiple pauses. You want to keep them clipped, fast-paced, and focused in order to maintain the feel of action. If she has time to "catch her breath and gather her thoughts," it really undercuts the sense that she's in any real danger. And if she's not in any real danger, well, she's setting off my Mary Sue detector.

>The pegasus gave a cocky grin wholly inappropriate to how much danger they were in.//

My point exactly. I get no sense of danger from the description.

>She took a nervous gulp, hoping the other mare didn’t notice.//

Now, we're finally getting somewhere.

>well placed//

Hyphen for the compound modifier.

>impa-//

Please use a proper dash.

>in embarrassment//

Read the section on show versus tell, too. Not that you have a widespread telling problem, but it discusses why this exact type of phrasing is extraneous.

>Rainbow thought about that for a moment as she sized up Twilight//

Why are you in Dash's head now? This could have easily been rendered from Twilight's perspective as she perceives Dash's behavior and interprets it.

>I-//

Use a dash.

>she opened them as glanced back at the document she’d been reviewing//

Missing word.

>Perspicacity//

Great googaly moogaly, that's a cumbersome name.

>I believe this should be the first order of business. I believe the article here speaks for itself.//

Repetitive starts to those sentences.

>tenant//

tenet

>form - a//

dash

>The longest she had ever seen one last was a few years, and that had been generations ago.//

You have twelve "to be" verbs in just the last two paragraphs. It makes the story feel like it's grinding to a halt. And looking ahead, five more in the next one.

>- a pegasus stallion with a red coat -//

Dashes. You get the picture. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

>probably would have claimed many more lives//

We didn't see it claim any…

>wrapped in the captain’s aura//

Participles are normally set off with a comma.

>do you have any ambitions towards an officer position?//

There we go. But realistically, her level of education would have already prompted this consideration from the beginning.

>trying to steer away from the melancholy quickly overtaking the room’s atmosphere//

How would Twilight know her intent?

>She kept the fact that she was being promoted quiet; she didn’t want to ruin Rainbow’s moment.//

This is a pretty low-key moment to end a chapter on. It doesn't wrap up a plot point or leave me with a cliffhanger. There's not any momentum carrying it into the next chapter.

Overall, this is a good story. It's got some problems with commas and dashes, which are easier to fix, and some problems with perspective and an abundance of "to be" verbs, which take a little more work. The fight scene could really use some more fleshing out with more of an emphasis on how Twilight feels while all of this is going on (without getting telly, of course), and pay attention to keep the sentence pacing commensurate with the action.

The two plot-based problems I have are by no means insurmountable. The whole business about Twilight's promotion isn't very plausible from an Earth-military standpoint, and the general assumption is that things in Equestria work like they do on Earth, absent any indication otherwise. So what to do? One path would be to make it compliant and come up with a reason why Twilight's still on combat duty. Maybe her paperwork to move into the officers' corps hasn't gone through yet. Maybe you rewrite her as actually having been a low-level officer already (second lieutenant or such) who has a few ponies under her command for this operation, and based on her success, she's getting bumped up higher. Or something else. There are several ways to play it in a viable manner.

Next, Rarity. I get that it's in her generous nature to offer to make the jewelry for free, but it's so forced. She immediately comes down to nothing from an opening offer of 500, then invites herself to tea with someone she's just met and couldn't possibly know whether she likes yet. Maybe she mulls over the price in her head at first but never names one because she's already decided to do it as a favor. She wants to pay tribute to a soldier, she recognizes Twilight's accent from a particular section of Canterlot, … Really, it could be a lot of things, bt something that would reasonably prompt her to do this and without the abrupt change of heart from thinking of asking such a high price to start with.

They never even really fleshed out what would make it that price anyway. Twilight trusts this stranger to invent some design, no approval needed? They never discussed how ornate, what kind of metal, if there would be additional stones or enamel added, etc. Again, just brainstorming here, but if you really want to have a price named, then maybe Rarity goes on a about platinum and finials and whatnot, and then when given a number, Twilight starts asking about simpler designs, cheaper metals, smaller size, backing down further each time a number out of her budget is mentioned. And then Rarity must finally see something in Twilight's eyes, because her salespony's smile vanishes and changes to the kind an old friend might use before she tells Twilight not to worry, and she'll come up with something appropriate for a fair exchange.

Really, I want to be careful not to write the story for you or stifle your own creative process. I'm just throwing out some examples to get you thinking about how to get around these hurdles in a way that works.

It's an interesting AU you have going here, and I'd like to see it come back in good shape so I can post it.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;egregiously-high//</span><br />Two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb don&#039;t use hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia deflated a little as she shifted to a more comfortable position on her chair, and buried her face in a hoof.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause; you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the advisor made her leave//</span><br />&quot;Took her leave,&quot; yes? Otherwise, it makes it sound like the advisor forced Celestia to leave.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My burst channel is ten thousand vortices//</span><br />I have zero idea what this is supposed to mean. Is that a lot? Does it mean raw power? An ability to multitask? Without knowing it&#039;s meaningless filler.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for princesses sakes//</span><br />That would be a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Shining always said he wished he had more unicorns that could learn more than a couple advanced spells.” Her voice cracked a little as she spoke, but she managed to be firm.//</span><br />The last female mentioned is Twilight&#039;s mther, so the presumption is that this all refers to her. I think you meant Twilight, though.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight Sparkle couldn’t help but glance across her parents’ kitchen//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoping Twilight Sparkle would see reason//</span><br />It&#039;s usually a good idea to keep your perspective consistent or make shifts in points of view smoothly. But here are two sentences in the same paragraph which are said from different perspectives. Only Twilight would know what she couldn&#039;t help doing, and only Velvet would know what she hoped, unless you couch one or both as the way another character perceives them. There&#039;s a more detailed explanation at the top of this thread in the section on head hopping.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But, what’s done is done.//</span><br />It&#039;s rare that commas after conjunctions are correctly used. This one is not. Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and eventually managed to convince them that she wasn’t actively committing suicide by enlisting//</span><br />Isn&#039;t this the real emotional high point of the chapter? Why are you glossing it over?<br /><br />A word about &quot;to be&quot; verbs: boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. It&#039;s not practical to remove them altogether, but their use can be minimized. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 51 in the first chapter alone, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen. You need to choose more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight gathered her magic, and magical energy lanced through the target, a little less than 3 inches away from the center.//</span><br />The use of &quot;magic&quot; and &quot;magical&quot; is fairly repetitive here, and please write out numbers that short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then asked for a few more shots with similar results//</span><br />As phrased, it sounds like he asked for similar results. A comma before &quot;with&quot; might fix it, but it still sounds a little off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the proctor remembered to close his jaw //</span><br />Jumpy perspectives again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He trotted over to an unused station, and brought over its weights.//</span><br />Another spot where you don&#039;t need the comma. There&#039;s also a section on comma use with conjunctions at the top of the thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and laid down on the only bench//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Cast a silencing spell on the gramophone.”//</span><br />Why go through the rigmarole of getting out a record player? Why not just have her silence him tapping a hoof on the table or another pony?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so we now I know//</span><br />Jumbled wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight poured as much power as she could draw into her horn.//</span><br />Pretty repetitive with the description of what the proctor told her to do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You are officially Private Twilight Sparkle in Their Majesties’ Royal Guard.”//</span><br />I guess I can&#039;t assume that this military would operate like Earth ones, but any recruit showing that kind of aptitude would immediately be sent to Officer Candidate School. In fact, as a graduate of the princesses&#039; academy, she should have been routed that way by default.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your majesty//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;less savory//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but if they didn’t laugh, they risked the disfavor of the pony saying it//</span><br />I can&#039;t identify whose perspective this is. Luna&#039;s, in interpreting their actions somehow? The collective mind of that group? It&#039;s a little off-putting to winder where this is coming from.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Perhaps I should try that more often.//</span><br />Isn&#039;t this in direct contradiction to her attitude at the beginning of the story?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A bell above the door chimed pleasantly as Twilight walked into the shop.//</span><br />I&#039;d encourage you to put another line break after the scene separators. It looks like an errant overstrike as is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s sentence trailed off//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to narrate this. It&#039;s already apparent from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not entirely sure what she was looking at//</span><br />Watch that perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;jeweler’s loop//</span><br />loupe<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In fact, now that I think about it, I must insist that it be free of charge!//</span><br />This is so convenient as to be contrived. Going from 500 to &quot;free, and I won&#039;t take no for an answer.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you could provide my sister and myself//</span><br />Reflexive pronouns are for when the antecedent is the subject. &quot;Me&quot; is appropriate here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s tried to think of something//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;been enough//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;edges. The//</span><br />Extraneous spaces.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;head first//</span><br />headfirst<br /><br />This battle scene is very… clinical. It&#039;s very factual but short on the emotions involved. While this might work if you had adopted an objective narration from the beginning, once you&#039;ve set limited narration as a consistent tone, it ends up making this feel bland and disconnected from the characters experiencing it.<br /><br />For example. take the part where Twilight feels the heat of the dragon&#039;s breath coming around her improvised rock shield. She&#039;s very businesslike and calmly starts planning out her next move. She doesn&#039;t wipe the sweat from her face, have second thoughts about the huge reptile towering over her, worry for the safety of that pegasus who&#039;s having trouble flying around the dragon. It&#039;s just fact after fact after fact. Pay attention to the rhythm as well. Most of the sentences around here are fairly long, with multiple pauses. You want to keep them clipped, fast-paced, and focused in order to maintain the feel of action. If she has time to &quot;catch her breath and gather her thoughts,&quot; it really undercuts the sense that she&#039;s in any real danger. And if she&#039;s not in any real danger, well, she&#039;s setting off my Mary Sue detector.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pegasus gave a cocky grin wholly inappropriate to how much danger they were in.//</span><br />My point exactly. I get no sense of danger from the description.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She took a nervous gulp, hoping the other mare didn’t notice.//</span><br />Now, we&#039;re finally getting somewhere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well placed//</span><br />Hyphen for the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;impa-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in embarrassment//</span><br />Read the section on show versus tell, too. Not that you have a widespread telling problem, but it discusses why this exact type of phrasing is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow thought about that for a moment as she sized up Twilight//</span><br />Why are you in Dash&#039;s head now? This could have easily been rendered from Twilight&#039;s perspective as she perceives Dash&#039;s behavior and interprets it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I-//</span><br />Use a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she opened them as glanced back at the document she’d been reviewing//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Perspicacity//</span><br />Great googaly moogaly, that&#039;s a cumbersome name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I believe this should be the first order of business. I believe the article here speaks for itself.//</span><br />Repetitive starts to those sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tenant//</span><br />tenet<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;form - a//</span><br />dash<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The longest she had ever seen one last was a few years, and that had been generations ago.//</span><br />You have twelve &quot;to be&quot; verbs in just the last two paragraphs. It makes the story feel like it&#039;s grinding to a halt. And looking ahead, five more in the next one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- a pegasus stallion with a red coat -//</span><br />Dashes. You get the picture. I&#039;m not going to mark any more of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;probably would have claimed many more lives//</span><br />We didn&#039;t see it claim any…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wrapped in the captain’s aura//</span><br />Participles are normally set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;do you have any ambitions towards an officer position?//</span><br />There we go. But realistically, her level of education would have already prompted this consideration from the beginning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trying to steer away from the melancholy quickly overtaking the room’s atmosphere//</span><br />How would Twilight know her intent?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She kept the fact that she was being promoted quiet; she didn’t want to ruin Rainbow’s moment.//</span><br />This is a pretty low-key moment to end a chapter on. It doesn&#039;t wrap up a plot point or leave me with a cliffhanger. There&#039;s not any momentum carrying it into the next chapter.<br /><br />Overall, this is a good story. It&#039;s got some problems with commas and dashes, which are easier to fix, and some problems with perspective and an abundance of &quot;to be&quot; verbs, which take a little more work. The fight scene could really use some more fleshing out with more of an emphasis on how Twilight feels while all of this is going on (without getting telly, of course), and pay attention to keep the sentence pacing commensurate with the action.<br /><br />The two plot-based problems I have are by no means insurmountable. The whole business about Twilight&#039;s promotion isn&#039;t very plausible from an Earth-military standpoint, and the general assumption is that things in Equestria work like they do on Earth, absent any indication otherwise. So what to do? One path would be to make it compliant and come up with a reason why Twilight&#039;s still on combat duty. Maybe her paperwork to move into the officers&#039; corps hasn&#039;t gone through yet. Maybe you rewrite her as actually having been a low-level officer already (second lieutenant or such) who has a few ponies under her command for this operation, and based on her success, she&#039;s getting bumped up higher. Or something else. There are several ways to play it in a viable manner.<br /><br />Next, Rarity. I get that it&#039;s in her generous nature to offer to make the jewelry for free, but it&#039;s so forced. She immediately comes down to nothing from an opening offer of 500, then invites herself to tea with someone she&#039;s just met and couldn&#039;t possibly know whether she likes yet. Maybe she mulls over the price in her head at first but never names one because she&#039;s already decided to do it as a favor. She wants to pay tribute to a soldier, she recognizes Twilight&#039;s accent from a particular section of Canterlot, … Really, it could be a lot of things, bt something that would reasonably prompt her to do this and without the abrupt change of heart from thinking of asking such a high price to start with.<br /><br />They never even really fleshed out what would make it that price anyway. Twilight trusts this stranger to invent some design, no approval needed? They never discussed how ornate, what kind of metal, if there would be additional stones or enamel added, etc. Again, just brainstorming here, but if you really want to have a price named, then maybe Rarity goes on a about platinum and finials and whatnot, and then when given a number, Twilight starts asking about simpler designs, cheaper metals, smaller size, backing down further each time a number out of her budget is mentioned. And then Rarity must finally see something in Twilight&#039;s eyes, because her salespony&#039;s smile vanishes and changes to the kind an old friend might use before she tells Twilight not to worry, and she&#039;ll come up with something appropriate for a fair exchange.<br /><br />Really, I want to be careful not to write the story for you or stifle your own creative process. I&#039;m just throwing out some examples to get you thinking about how to get around these hurdles in a way that works.<br /><br />It&#039;s an interesting AU you have going here, and I&#039;d like to see it come back in good shape so I can post it.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Sep 8th, 2014 21:08</span></div><br/>

The PonytricianCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 274

>>131020
Greetings Pre-reader 63.546 (or shall I call you Copper? ;) )

First of all, thank you for your feedback. It is greatly appreciated.

I've reviewed and tidied up this story somewhat. My only excuse for the majority of these errors is due to most of my writing being done sometime around or after midnight, usually after a long day of work. That, and being too lazy/tired to edit it properly before submitting it.

The only point I'm taking exception to is:
> I'd also recommend substituting another word or phrase for the first instance of "school" to avoid the repetition.

Only because "school" is a noun, and "[Celestia's] School for Gifted Unicorns" is a proper noun.

I presume the next step is to resubmit the story through Equestria Daily? Or will you do a second "pre-read and feedback" prior to resubmission?

Kind regards,
The Ponytrician.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131020" onclick="return highlight('131020', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131020">&gt;&gt;131020</a><br />Greetings Pre-reader 63.546 (or shall I call you Copper? ;) )<br /><br />First of all, thank you for your feedback. It is greatly appreciated. <br /><br />I&#039;ve reviewed and tidied up this story somewhat. My only excuse for the majority of these errors is due to most of my writing being done sometime around or after midnight, usually after a long day of work. That, and being too lazy/tired to edit it properly before submitting it.<br /><br />The only point I&#039;m taking exception to is:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; I&#039;d also recommend substituting another word or phrase for the first instance of &quot;school&quot; to avoid the repetition.</span><br /><br />Only because &quot;school&quot; is a noun, and &quot;[Celestia&#039;s] School for Gifted Unicorns&quot; is a proper noun.<br /><br />I presume the next step is to resubmit the story through Equestria Daily? Or will you do a second &quot;pre-read and feedback&quot; prior to resubmission?<br /><br />Kind regards, <br />The Ponytrician.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 275

>>131029
Resubmit through the form, when you're ready, but if you have questions about specific passages. There's no need to look over the whole story as a precursor, since I'll be doing that anyway when it's in our queue again.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131029" onclick="return highlight('131029', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131029">&gt;&gt;131029</a><br />Resubmit through the form, when you&#039;re ready, but if you have questions about specific passages. There&#039;s no need to look over the whole story as a precursor, since I&#039;ll be doing that anyway when it&#039;s in our queue again.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 276

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Twilight Sparkle nodded, admiring the precise parabolic arc the horseshoe made as it traveled through the air toward the metal stake at the other end of the pit.//

This sentence might do fine in the middle of the story, but as your opener, it winds around a bit too much. You want to establish something simple and clear, even if it might ramble a bit, but it should at least have a consistent focus. Here, we start on Twilight, but the focus quickly shifts to the horseshoe and spends most of the sentence there. Twilight's more interesting; we're here for the characters, after all. I'd recommend splitting this into two sentences, so you can have a stronger, simpler hook on the character.

>She scooped up a shoe//

When you have a repeated action, it's often a good idea to acknowledge it or rephrase. Her, I'd recommend saying "another" shoe.

>Just throw the shoe//

>Twilight hurled the shoe into the air//
"The shoe" is getting used a lot. Here are two places where it'd have a clear antecedent, so you could just say "it."

>Applejack bit the inside of her cheek to keep her giggles under control.//

The previous paragraph was the first one with a very definite perspective, but it was Twilight's. this has jumped into Applejack's viewpoint, though. It might be hard for her to even see Applejack do this, but it also isn't apparent how Twilight would know Applejack's motive.

>Poor Twi. She’s really tryin’.//

Skipping into AJ's perspective again. Is it even necessary for her to say this to herself? Twilight could easily read her attitude from her expression.

>So here’s the new rule: You can use your magic to throw the shoe, but you can’t just, you know, float it over there and whatnot.//

You typically only capitalize after a colon if what comes before it refers to multiple sentences.

>Twilight’s rear legs gave way and she sat down hard in the soft sand.//

Comma between the clauses.

>sweet voice//

The perspective's been wavering enough that I don't know whose opinion this is.

>sis//

When used as a title or substitute for a name, capitalize family members.

>Applejack scooped up Apple Bloom and rubbing her hoof playfully into her little sister’s head.//

Verb tense.

>Apple Bloom’s eyes shined.//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense. It requires a direct object. You want "shone."

Okay, my impression after the first scene is that it was wholly unnecessary. All it does is get the characters to the farm, and I don't see why they couldn't just start there. That said, it does set a mood, and I'm more tolerant of mood-setting scenes than most are. I didn't mind it as a nice SoL moment to start things out, but you may well get readers wondering what the point was. Edit: now I see the significance of the "dragon's tail" here, but that's an awful long time to wait for a payoff to justify an entire scene, and a modest one at that.

>“You have to help me! I’m at my wit’s end!”//

You transition back and forth between dialogue and narration four times in this paragraph. While it's okay to do so once in a while, you generally want to limit that to twice. Consider whether this paragraph is so coherent that it couldn't stand being split into two.

>Cake from ripping out any more of her mane out.//

One of those "out" is extraneous.

>back into the bag and placed it back//

Repetitive wording.

>Twilight gently rubbed the baker's back in what she hoped was a soothing manner.//

You'd started the scene in Applejack's perspective, so why switch to Twilight here? Now, I will say that this isn't an objectively wrong thing to do. Various writing guides will show examples where the perspective jumps around, even within a single paragraph. It's not that it can't be done, but you really have to be aware of what effect you're creating by doing so. It tends to work better in longer stories (think novel length) where we'll have plenty of opportunity to get to know the characters, but in shorter works, you don't have as long to create that connection with the reader. It also tends to work better in comedy. The bottom line is that the only thing I can say objectively is that I find these frequent and sudden shifts to be jarring and preventing me from getting settled enough to identify with any of them. Whether that's a problem is up to you. Let's just leave it that there's a lot of this throughout the story. I won't mark it anymore.

>Mrs. Cake gulped down a few steadying breaths and tried to compose herself.//

Now there's a third viewpoint in the mix. It wouldn't be hard to recast this as another character's perception of Mrs. Cake's behavior.

>princess herself//

Extraneous space.

>“But I guess you’ve had a quiet week!”//

Another paragraph that jumps back and forth between narration and speech a lot. You could divide it into two paragraphs, reorganize it to group more of the dialogue together, maybe put one or two of the pieces of narration as asides.

>Mrs. Cake’s eyes began to fill again and her voice caught in her throat.//

Comma between the clauses.

>I can’t even lose one!//

It feels like she'd emphasize "one," either to the exclusion of the rest or above it, i.e., back to normal font or bold or all caps.

>While Mrs. Cake fetched a lace handkerchief from her packs,//

One handkerchief from multiple packs?

>Applejack daubed at the mare’s eyes.//

I think you meant "dabbed." "Daub" means she's applying something like makeup or paint.

>Twilight and Applejack both moved to comfort the baker as she collapsed into sobs.//

And this paragraph has five isolated pieces of dialogue. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

>We’ll get her outta the shop and y’all can have some peace while you whip up all them yummy treats.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>All around them were reminders of the delicious baked goods that the confectioners were known for.//

This is so vague as to lose its significance. Give me an example or two. Twilight sees the cupcake that reminds her of the time she met X for lunch and the tart she had the day Y happened.

>got so much work to get done//

Repetitive. Just use "do" in place of "get done."

>The Cakes looked up in unison//

Fifth paragraph in a row that starts with a character's name. Little things like this can make the writing settle into a rut. This is also repetitive with the stomachs growling in unison a few paragraphs back.

>Applejack cupped Twilight’s ear with her hoof.//

It was in the previous scene, but it's still recent enough that it sticks in my head as something I just read.

>extra hard//

Hyphenate.

>BIG//

Italics are preferred as first-line emphasis.

>Twilight’s frowned and tapped her hoof on the kitchen’s well-worn floor for for a few moments.//

Typo.

>Twilight concentrated for a moment and shimmering, purple energy surrounded her horn, and then the baker’s rear door…

Comma between the clauses.

>furious with herself//

Get me to sense her mood, feel it with her. This doesn't carry much weight as a cold fact.

>emphasizing the last few words//

Anything I could have gotten from this is already conveyed by the fact that they're in italics.

>felt his knees grow suddenly weak//

I know I said I wouldn't mark any more, but… this would be so evident through his appearance. Why jump to his head for the grand total of half a sentence?

>muttering “//

Needs a comma.

>back to Applejack and back//

You don't need that first "back."

>Catching up, Twilight’s smile was a little too wide.//

Dangling participle. "Catching up" describes Twilight, but she doesn't appear in the sentence in a form that a participle can modify. You're explicitly saying that her smile catches up. While technically correct, it's just odd.

>Land’s sake//

Usually, it's "land sakes."

>of … well//

You don't always space your ellipses the same way. Be consistent.

>Fluttershy was sitting on her stoop, eyes locked on her front door and picking absently at a few blades of grass when her friends trotted up.//

For want of a comma… As written, her eyes are picking at the grass. If you put a comma after "door" to signal the end of the participle, it more implies that "picking" branches as a compound from "sitting," which is what you want.

>Landing, she moved to embrace her friend before pulling up short.//

You are a little heavy on participles, but not overwhelmingly so. Here, though, the synchronization is off. The participle means that she moves to embrace her friend at the same time she lands, but they'd more reasonably happen one after the other.

>she adjusting her hat//

Verb form.

>As she strained, the earthy tastes of iron and dirt filled her mouth. She grimaced and did her best to keep her tongue away from the metal. With a muffled growl, Applejack yanked again, and her muscles bunched visibly. Twilight couldn’t help sharing a wistful glance with Fluttershy. Both of them wondered what it would be like to have such strength.//

Switching perspectives in the same paragraph.

>Finally, Applejack collapsed back onto her haunches, sucking in huge lungfuls of air and shooting dirty looks at the horseshoe. It hadn’t budged at all. Fanning her herself with her hat, she turned to Twilight, motioning with her head back at the horseshoe.//

Just look at all those participles.

>Twilight’s magic aura surrounded the shoe and she focused as clearly as she could on the mental image of the horseshoe pulling free from the door.//

Comma needed between the clauses.

>underneath of//

Lose the "of."

>Applejack frowned. “Pitching.”//

This comes immediately after Twilight's speech is cut off, but it loses its feeling of immediacy if the narrator has time to wedge something else in there. What cuts her off needs to be the very next thing in the story. It's possible the frown is what does that, but if so, you need to say so, since it wouldn't be obvious.

>Twilight was trying to decided//

Verb form.

>Fluttershy hooves flew to her mouth.//

Needs a possessive.

>Twilight knew her friend would protect the woodland creatures with her life, if necessary.//

And she's not going to do anything to help?

>reveal revealed//

Extraneous word.

>rapid fire//

It's being used as a single-unit modifier, so hyphenate it.

>spun it their sockets//

Typo. This is also the same thing that happened to Twilight earlier. It's a little over the top, and a visual effect that doesn't translate too well into writing.

>The wyvern was almost out of sight and it would be a few minutes before they could possibly get all the way up the hill.//

Comma needed between the clauses.

>Pulling up short, their eyes widened when they both nearly ran headfirst into a tower of detritus.//

Besides being the third sentence in a row to open with a participle, this one's also a dangling one. It says their eyes pulled up short.

>She wasn't used long distance galloping//

Missing word, and "long-distance" needs to be hyphenated.

>I bet—Hey!//

It seems to me that you've consistently been capitalizing after a dash. Most reviewers will tell you never to. I think there are times when you can, but they have to be carefully considered. Still, the reader's unlikely to notice or realize the significance, so if you're going to do all of them the same, go with lower case.

>Twilight’s magic enveloped the door and she gripped it as firmly as she could.//

Comma between the clauses.

>she was let out a surprised cry//

Extraneous word.

>Now free itself//

Comma after the introductory element.

>where Applejack, slammed into it at full speed//

Extraneous comma.

>Fluttershy hit the ground and covering her eyes with her hooves.//

Verb form.

>Bumping along behind Applejack, Pinkie’s eyes widened.//

Another dangling participle.

>Scanning the scenery whizzing by, Pinkie looked over her shoulder at her friends//

Another case where a participle synchronizes two actions that really shouldn't be.

>she’d spied a crystalline statue of a pony glinted in the sunlight//

Verb form.

>they sheared off the end of Applejack’s tail and she rolled away//

Comma between the clauses.

>Boiling over with rage, the wyvern lashed out with its tail again and again, stinging anything within reach while it struggled to catch the more agile pony.//

That dragon's doing a lot of stinging. How much venom does it have? This is why a lot of venomous snakes dry bite when they're not hunting: venom takes energy to produce, and the snake can't afford to waste it when the bite itself will achieve the desired effect.

>She gave the statue one last, taunting shake//

These adjectives feel more hierarchical than coordinate. You don't need that comma.

>Applejack tucked her bangs back up under her hat//

I've never seen them do anything but hang out…

>mouth full//

mouthful

>ol'//

Seems odd to have the simple-style apostrophe here when you don't with other elisions. In fact, you used the fancier one earlier on the same word.

>faire//

You'd called it a festival all along. Why change now?

>Nevermind//

That's two words.

>it!"//

The quotation marks here are a different style than the rest of the story.

The problem here has never been the plot. It's a cute story. The only consistent problems I'm seeing are a really jumpy narrative viewpoint, a tendency to use lots and lots of participles, and paragraphs that go back and forth between narration and speech too much. Those aren't too hard to fix, though they can take a little time to root out.

Take this line:
Well, I reckon I needed a trim anyway, she thought

If she mutters this out loud instead, it doesn't necessitate going into her perspective. there are other times that you dip into other characters' perspectives as well, but that you could have just as easily narrated the external symptoms of what that character was feeling or thinking. That way, you can leave the conclusions up to the reader or a consistent perspective character. That said, you can use an omniscient narrator who can relate any character's thoughts, but even then, you still have to do smooth transitions between them and keep them from being too frequent. But when you have a narrator essentially speaking a character's thoughts for her, you lose that omniscience.

Here are a couple of examples:
>Fluttershy was circling what appeared to be a small dragon//
An omniscient narrator knows it's a dragon. The use of "appear" suggests a character's viewpoint.
>Or they tried to, at least.//
This strikes a conversational tone that takes on Twilight's thought process.

If you intended it to be omniscient, you could remove the few instances where the narrator takes such a tone. Even then, it's a good idea to keep from transferring the "camera" too abruptly or often. If, instead, you want a limited narration, then it could use a lot more of these conversational statements, like "Why would he do that?" versus "She wondered why he would do that."

I also don't quite understand what Mrs. Cake's problem is. Pinkie has nothing to do, so she's eating all the sugar, but today, she's only been staring at the door, and so is presumably not causing that problem anymore. So why is Mrs. Cake still upset? And why would she want them to do something about it? They do end up taking her on an adventure, but now that they're home again and Pinkie's no longer distracted by the door, she'll presumably go back to eating sugar. So wouldn't the Cakes be dismayed to have her back under the circumstances?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight Sparkle nodded, admiring the precise parabolic arc the horseshoe made as it traveled through the air toward the metal stake at the other end of the pit.//</span><br />This sentence might do fine in the middle of the story, but as your opener, it winds around a bit too much. You want to establish something simple and clear, even if it might ramble a bit, but it should at least have a consistent focus. Here, we start on Twilight, but the focus quickly shifts to the horseshoe and spends most of the sentence there. Twilight&#039;s more interesting; we&#039;re here for the characters, after all. I&#039;d recommend splitting this into two sentences, so you can have a stronger, simpler hook on the character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She scooped up a shoe//</span><br />When you have a repeated action, it&#039;s often a good idea to acknowledge it or rephrase. Her, I&#039;d recommend saying &quot;another&quot; shoe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just throw the shoe//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight hurled the shoe into the air//</span><br />&quot;The shoe&quot; is getting used a lot. Here are two places where it&#039;d have a clear antecedent, so you could just say &quot;it.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack bit the inside of her cheek to keep her giggles under control.//</span><br />The previous paragraph was the first one with a very definite perspective, but it was Twilight&#039;s. this has jumped into Applejack&#039;s viewpoint, though. It might be hard for her to even see Applejack do this, but it also isn&#039;t apparent how Twilight would know Applejack&#039;s motive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Poor Twi. She’s really tryin’.//</span><br />Skipping into AJ&#039;s perspective again. Is it even necessary for her to say this to herself? Twilight could easily read her attitude from her expression.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So here’s the new rule: You can use your magic to throw the shoe, but you can’t just, you know, float it over there and whatnot.//</span><br />You typically only capitalize after a colon if what comes before it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s rear legs gave way and she sat down hard in the soft sand.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sweet voice//</span><br />The perspective&#039;s been wavering enough that I don&#039;t know whose opinion this is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />When used as a title or substitute for a name, capitalize family members.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack scooped up Apple Bloom and rubbing her hoof playfully into her little sister’s head.//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom’s eyes shined.//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is the transitive past tense. It requires a direct object. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br />Okay, my impression after the first scene is that it was wholly unnecessary. All it does is get the characters to the farm, and I don&#039;t see why they couldn&#039;t just start there. That said, it does set a mood, and I&#039;m more tolerant of mood-setting scenes than most are. I didn&#039;t mind it as a nice SoL moment to start things out, but you may well get readers wondering what the point was. Edit: now I see the significance of the &quot;dragon&#039;s tail&quot; here, but that&#039;s an awful long time to wait for a payoff to justify an entire scene, and a modest one at that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You have to help me! I’m at my wit’s end!”//</span><br />You transition back and forth between dialogue and narration four times in this paragraph. While it&#039;s okay to do so once in a while, you generally want to limit that to twice. Consider whether this paragraph is so coherent that it couldn&#039;t stand being split into two.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cake from ripping out any more of her mane out.//</span><br />One of those &quot;out&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back into the bag and placed it back//</span><br />Repetitive wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight gently rubbed the baker&#039;s back in what she hoped was a soothing manner.//</span><br />You&#039;d started the scene in Applejack&#039;s perspective, so why switch to Twilight here? Now, I will say that this isn&#039;t an objectively wrong thing to do. Various writing guides will show examples where the perspective jumps around, even within a single paragraph. It&#039;s not that it can&#039;t be done, but you really have to be aware of what effect you&#039;re creating by doing so. It tends to work better in longer stories (think novel length) where we&#039;ll have plenty of opportunity to get to know the characters, but in shorter works, you don&#039;t have as long to create that connection with the reader. It also tends to work better in comedy. The bottom line is that the only thing I can say objectively is that I find these frequent and sudden shifts to be jarring and preventing me from getting settled enough to identify with any of them. Whether that&#039;s a problem is up to you. Let&#039;s just leave it that there&#039;s a lot of this throughout the story. I won&#039;t mark it anymore.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mrs. Cake gulped down a few steadying breaths and tried to compose herself.//</span><br />Now there&#039;s a third viewpoint in the mix. It wouldn&#039;t be hard to recast this as another character&#039;s perception of Mrs. Cake&#039;s behavior.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princess herself//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“But I guess you’ve had a quiet week!”//</span><br />Another paragraph that jumps back and forth between narration and speech a lot. You could divide it into two paragraphs, reorganize it to group more of the dialogue together, maybe put one or two of the pieces of narration as asides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mrs. Cake’s eyes began to fill again and her voice caught in her throat.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can’t even lose one!//</span><br />It feels like she&#039;d emphasize &quot;one,&quot; either to the exclusion of the rest or above it, i.e., back to normal font or bold or all caps.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;While Mrs. Cake fetched a lace handkerchief from her packs,//</span><br />One handkerchief from multiple packs?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack daubed at the mare’s eyes.//</span><br />I think you meant &quot;dabbed.&quot; &quot;Daub&quot; means she&#039;s applying something like makeup or paint.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight and Applejack both moved to comfort the baker as she collapsed into sobs.//</span><br />And this paragraph has five isolated pieces of dialogue. I&#039;m not going to mark any more of these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We’ll get her outta the shop and y’all can have some peace while you whip up all them yummy treats.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All around them were reminders of the delicious baked goods that the confectioners were known for.//</span><br />This is so vague as to lose its significance. Give me an example or two. Twilight sees the cupcake that reminds her of the time she met X for lunch and the tart she had the day Y happened.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;got so much work to get done//</span><br />Repetitive. Just use &quot;do&quot; in place of &quot;get done.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Cakes looked up in unison//</span><br />Fifth paragraph in a row that starts with a character&#039;s name. Little things like this can make the writing settle into a rut. This is also repetitive with the stomachs growling in unison a few paragraphs back.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack cupped Twilight’s ear with her hoof.//</span><br />It was in the previous scene, but it&#039;s still recent enough that it sticks in my head as something I just read.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;extra hard//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;BIG//</span><br />Italics are preferred as first-line emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s frowned and tapped her hoof on the kitchen’s well-worn floor for for a few moments.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight concentrated for a moment and shimmering, purple energy surrounded her horn, and then the baker’s rear door…</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;furious with herself//</span><br />Get me to sense her mood, feel it with her. This doesn&#039;t carry much weight as a cold fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;emphasizing the last few words//</span><br />Anything I could have gotten from this is already conveyed by the fact that they&#039;re in italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;felt his knees grow suddenly weak//</span><br />I know I said I wouldn&#039;t mark any more, but… this would be so evident through his appearance. Why jump to his head for the grand total of half a sentence?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;muttering “//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back to Applejack and back//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that first &quot;back.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Catching up, Twilight’s smile was a little too wide.//</span><br />Dangling participle. &quot;Catching up&quot; describes Twilight, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the sentence in a form that a participle can modify. You&#039;re explicitly saying that her smile catches up. While technically correct, it&#039;s just odd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Land’s sake//</span><br />Usually, it&#039;s &quot;land sakes.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of … well//</span><br />You don&#039;t always space your ellipses the same way. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy was sitting on her stoop, eyes locked on her front door and picking absently at a few blades of grass when her friends trotted up.//</span><br />For want of a comma… As written, her eyes are picking at the grass. If you put a comma after &quot;door&quot; to signal the end of the participle, it more implies that &quot;picking&quot; branches as a compound from &quot;sitting,&quot; which is what you want.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Landing, she moved to embrace her friend before pulling up short.//</span><br />You are a little heavy on participles, but not overwhelmingly so. Here, though, the synchronization is off. The participle means that she moves to embrace her friend at the same time she lands, but they&#039;d more reasonably happen one after the other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she adjusting her hat//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As she strained, the earthy tastes of iron and dirt filled her mouth. She grimaced and did her best to keep her tongue away from the metal. With a muffled growl, Applejack yanked again, and her muscles bunched visibly. Twilight couldn’t help sharing a wistful glance with Fluttershy. Both of them wondered what it would be like to have such strength.//</span><br />Switching perspectives in the same paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Finally, Applejack collapsed back onto her haunches, sucking in huge lungfuls of air and shooting dirty looks at the horseshoe. It hadn’t budged at all. Fanning her herself with her hat, she turned to Twilight, motioning with her head back at the horseshoe.//</span><br />Just look at all those participles.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s magic aura surrounded the shoe and she focused as clearly as she could on the mental image of the horseshoe pulling free from the door.//</span><br />Comma needed between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;underneath of//</span><br />Lose the &quot;of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack frowned. “Pitching.”//</span><br />This comes immediately after Twilight&#039;s speech is cut off, but it loses its feeling of immediacy if the narrator has time to wedge something else in there. What cuts her off needs to be the very next thing in the story. It&#039;s possible the frown is what does that, but if so, you need to say so, since it wouldn&#039;t be obvious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight was trying to decided//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy hooves flew to her mouth.//</span><br />Needs a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight knew her friend would protect the woodland creatures with her life, if necessary.//</span><br />And she&#039;s not going to do anything to help?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reveal revealed//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rapid fire//</span><br />It&#039;s being used as a single-unit modifier, so hyphenate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spun it their sockets//</span><br />Typo. This is also the same thing that happened to Twilight earlier. It&#039;s a little over the top, and a visual effect that doesn&#039;t translate too well into writing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The wyvern was almost out of sight and it would be a few minutes before they could possibly get all the way up the hill.//</span><br />Comma needed between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pulling up short, their eyes widened when they both nearly ran headfirst into a tower of detritus.//</span><br />Besides being the third sentence in a row to open with a participle, this one&#039;s also a dangling one. It says their eyes pulled up short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wasn&#039;t used long distance galloping//</span><br />Missing word, and &quot;long-distance&quot; needs to be hyphenated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I bet—Hey!//</span><br />It seems to me that you&#039;ve consistently been capitalizing after a dash. Most reviewers will tell you never to. I think there are times when you can, but they have to be carefully considered. Still, the reader&#039;s unlikely to notice or realize the significance, so if you&#039;re going to do all of them the same, go with lower case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight’s magic enveloped the door and she gripped it as firmly as she could.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was let out a surprised cry//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now free itself//</span><br />Comma after the introductory element.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;where Applejack, slammed into it at full speed//</span><br />Extraneous comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy hit the ground and covering her eyes with her hooves.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bumping along behind Applejack, Pinkie’s eyes widened.//</span><br />Another dangling participle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scanning the scenery whizzing by, Pinkie looked over her shoulder at her friends//</span><br />Another case where a participle synchronizes two actions that really shouldn&#039;t be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she’d spied a crystalline statue of a pony glinted in the sunlight//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they sheared off the end of Applejack’s tail and she rolled away//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Boiling over with rage, the wyvern lashed out with its tail again and again, stinging anything within reach while it struggled to catch the more agile pony.//</span><br />That dragon&#039;s doing a lot of stinging. How much venom does it have? This is why a lot of venomous snakes dry bite when they&#039;re not hunting: venom takes energy to produce, and the snake can&#039;t afford to waste it when the bite itself will achieve the desired effect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She gave the statue one last, taunting shake//</span><br />These adjectives feel more hierarchical than coordinate. You don&#039;t need that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack tucked her bangs back up under her hat//</span><br />I&#039;ve never seen them do anything but hang out…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mouth full//</span><br />mouthful<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ol&#039;//</span><br />Seems odd to have the simple-style apostrophe here when you don&#039;t with other elisions. In fact, you used the fancier one earlier on the same word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;faire//</span><br />You&#039;d called it a festival all along. Why change now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nevermind//</span><br />That&#039;s two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it!&quot;//</span><br />The quotation marks here are a different style than the rest of the story.<br /><br />The problem here has never been the plot. It&#039;s a cute story. The only consistent problems I&#039;m seeing are a really jumpy narrative viewpoint, a tendency to use lots and lots of participles, and paragraphs that go back and forth between narration and speech too much. Those aren&#039;t too hard to fix, though they can take a little time to root out.<br /><br />Take this line:<br /><i>Well, I reckon I needed a trim anyway</i>, she thought<br /><br />If she mutters this out loud instead, it doesn&#039;t necessitate going into her perspective. there are other times that you dip into other characters&#039; perspectives as well, but that you could have just as easily narrated the external symptoms of what that character was feeling or thinking. That way, you can leave the conclusions up to the reader or a consistent perspective character. That said, you can use an omniscient narrator who can relate any character&#039;s thoughts, but even then, you still have to do smooth transitions between them and keep them from being too frequent. But when you have a narrator essentially speaking a character&#039;s thoughts for her, you lose that omniscience.<br /><br />Here are a couple of examples:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy was circling what appeared to be a small dragon//</span><br />An omniscient narrator knows it&#039;s a dragon. The use of &quot;appear&quot; suggests a character&#039;s viewpoint.<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Or they <i>tried to</i>, at least.//</span><br />This strikes a conversational tone that takes on Twilight&#039;s thought process.<br /><br />If you intended it to be omniscient, you could remove the few instances where the narrator takes such a tone. Even then, it&#039;s a good idea to keep from transferring the &quot;camera&quot; too abruptly or often. If, instead, you want a limited narration, then it could use a lot more of these conversational statements, like &quot;Why would he do that?&quot; versus &quot;She wondered why he would do that.&quot;<br /><br />I also don&#039;t quite understand what Mrs. Cake&#039;s problem is. Pinkie has nothing to do, so she&#039;s eating all the sugar, but today, she&#039;s only been staring at the door, and so is presumably not causing that problem anymore. So why is Mrs. Cake still upset? And why would she want them to do something about it? They do end up taking her on an adventure, but now that they&#039;re home again and Pinkie&#039;s no longer distracted by the door, she&#039;ll presumably go back to eating sugar. So wouldn&#039;t the Cakes be dismayed to have her back under the circumstances?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 277

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>And yet, the books themselves were untouched.//

There's rarely a good reason to put a comma after a conjunction. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>At the far end of the passage, Princess of the Sun could hear chattering.//

Missing a "the."

>“Hello, Twilight,” Celestia mused.//

Not the best choice of speaking verb. It implies she's thoughtful about something, but what she actually says is mindless banter.

>amount of books//

"Amount" is for collective quantities. You want "number."

>Celestia sighed, taking a seat on the cushion across from her former student. She took several moments//

Watch the close repetition of taking/took.

>sister….//

Three dots in an ellipsis.

>She accepted the duty without reservation, and served all the races of Equestria as final judge of where a pony would be sent.//

You only need a comma with a conjunction if there's a new clause or if a compound structure is particularly complex or lengthy. This is all a single clause and a pretty simple one, too. There are a few basic examples at the top of this thread in the section on comma use with conjunctions.

>Why would she have forgotten her?//

>Twilight grew quiet, looking down at the book in her hooves with a new found reverence.//
That's a very abrupt change of perspective. Check out the section on head hopping at te top of this thread.

>Her eyes shined//

"Shined" is the transitive version—it requires a direct object. You want "shone."

>Serenity cared for all of Equestria's races equally, but she shared a special love for ponykind. Ponies were very interesting to the young Princess, as their lives were full of joy and color.//

This lacks any punch, as it's all very factual. Give me some evocative language some anecdotes, some emotional attachment from her. Then I'll identify with her.

>“Halt!” She called out.//

Just because the quote ended in something other than a comma doesn't mean you capitalize the speech tag that comes after it.

>before being carried upon to their final resting place//

What is that "upon" doing there?

>I present to you for judgment, the honorable pony//

No reason for that comma.

>Your name is fit for a king, dear pony. Step forward, and receive thy judgment.//

Why the inconsistent use of your/thy?

>But, you shouldn’t have! Please, let us reimburse you.//

That first comma is unnecessary. And who is saying this? Who in a charitable organization would have the resources to reimburse him for the purchase of an entire building?

>F-F-Foals//

Only capitalize the first one in a stutter.

>You shall forever pass into the Summer Lands, and know pain nevermore//

No comma.

>the creatures head//

Missing apostrophe.

>Two spindly arms//

You used this same description just a few paragraphs ago.

>who he murdered//

Whom.

>brother//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>grabbing a hold//

Unless you're using dialect (which your narrator really shouldn't in this situation), it's just "grabbing hold."

>Generous Soul was never a bad pony. He had inside him the true light of goodness all along.//

This is pretty unjustified. It's just kind of hand-waved. How would she have such a change of attitude, and so quickly? How is this fair to any she'd previously sent to Tartarus? And if he's transformed by the compassion she shows for him, why wouldn't the same happen to Tirek?

>a tear slipping out of her eye//

The single tear is a highly cliched thing.

I pointed out many examples but not every instance of each problem. The biggest mechanical things should be obvious as the ones I pointed out more often. There was also the occasional instance of repetitive word choice or phrasing.

Watch your perspective. In a story this short, it;s generally advisable to keep to a small number of perspectives, but you jump around. Keep in mind which point of view the narrator is using and stay consistent with what that character could know or perceive.

The story's climax is pretty emotionally detached. It goes through the events of what happened but is pretty sparse about communicating how the characters feel about those events. This is particularly the case since you're using a subjective narrator. If it reads like a historical account, it loses its engaging qualities.

Your storytelling method is trying to pull double duty, and it's tough to make that work. It's framed as a diary entry, but then it's presented in flashback form. However the two are detached. The flashback presents the story essentially live, with detailed descriptions and quoted dialogue, things which wouldn't actually appear in a diary format. So it's sending mixed messages. The flashback even covers things that Celestia couldn't be aware of, even though she supposedly wrote the diary.

Lastly, what was Scorpan even doing there? It's incredibly convenient for him to show up right when he was needed. He never even hints that it's because he sensed something wrong or had been following Tirek. He just appears at the perfect time to save the day.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And yet, the books themselves were untouched.//</span><br />There&#039;s rarely a good reason to put a comma after a conjunction. They&#039;re not for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At the far end of the passage, Princess of the Sun could hear chattering.//</span><br />Missing a &quot;the.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Hello, Twilight,” Celestia mused.//</span><br />Not the best choice of speaking verb. It implies she&#039;s thoughtful about something, but what she actually says is mindless banter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;amount of books//</span><br />&quot;Amount&quot; is for collective quantities. You want &quot;number.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia sighed, taking a seat on the cushion across from her former student. She took several moments//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of taking/took.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sister….//</span><br />Three dots in an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She accepted the duty without reservation, and served all the races of Equestria as final judge of where a pony would be sent.//</span><br />You only need a comma with a conjunction if there&#039;s a new clause or if a compound structure is particularly complex or lengthy. This is all a single clause and a pretty simple one, too. There are a few basic examples at the top of this thread in the section on comma use with conjunctions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why would she have forgotten her?//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight grew quiet, looking down at the book in her hooves with a new found reverence.//</span><br />That&#039;s a very abrupt change of perspective. Check out the section on head hopping at te top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes shined//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is the transitive version—it requires a direct object. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Serenity cared for all of Equestria&#039;s races equally, but she shared a special love for ponykind. Ponies were very interesting to the young Princess, as their lives were full of joy and color.//</span><br />This lacks any punch, as it&#039;s all very factual. Give me some evocative language some anecdotes, some emotional attachment from her. Then I&#039;ll identify with her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Halt!” She called out.//</span><br />Just because the quote ended in something other than a comma doesn&#039;t mean you capitalize the speech tag that comes after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;before being carried upon to their final resting place//</span><br />What is that &quot;upon&quot; doing there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I present to you for judgment, the honorable pony//</span><br />No reason for that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your name is fit for a king, dear pony. Step forward, and receive thy judgment.//</span><br />Why the inconsistent use of your/thy?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>But, you shouldn’t have! Please, let us reimburse you.</i>//</span><br />That first comma is unnecessary. And who is saying this? Who in a charitable organization would have the resources to reimburse him for the purchase of an entire building?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;F-F-Foals//</span><br />Only capitalize the first one in a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You shall forever pass into the Summer Lands, and know pain nevermore//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the creatures head//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Two spindly arms//</span><br />You used this same description just a few paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who he murdered//</span><br />Whom.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brother//</span><br />As a term of address, this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;grabbing a hold//</span><br />Unless you&#039;re using dialect (which your narrator really shouldn&#039;t in this situation), it&#039;s just &quot;grabbing hold.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Generous Soul was never a bad pony. He had inside him the true light of goodness all along.//</span><br />This is pretty unjustified. It&#039;s just kind of hand-waved. How would she have such a change of attitude, and so quickly? How is this fair to any she&#039;d previously sent to Tartarus? And if he&#039;s transformed by the compassion she shows for him, why wouldn&#039;t the same happen to Tirek?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a tear slipping out of her eye//</span><br />The single tear is a highly cliched thing.<br /><br />I pointed out many examples but not every instance of each problem. The biggest mechanical things should be obvious as the ones I pointed out more often. There was also the occasional instance of repetitive word choice or phrasing.<br /><br />Watch your perspective. In a story this short, it;s generally advisable to keep to a small number of perspectives, but you jump around. Keep in mind which point of view the narrator is using and stay consistent with what that character could know or perceive.<br /><br />The story&#039;s climax is pretty emotionally detached. It goes through the events of what happened but is pretty sparse about communicating how the characters feel about those events. This is particularly the case since you&#039;re using a subjective narrator. If it reads like a historical account, it loses its engaging qualities.<br /><br />Your storytelling method is trying to pull double duty, and it&#039;s tough to make that work. It&#039;s framed as a diary entry, but then it&#039;s presented in flashback form. However the two are detached. The flashback presents the story essentially live, with detailed descriptions and quoted dialogue, things which wouldn&#039;t actually appear in a diary format. So it&#039;s sending mixed messages. The flashback even covers things that Celestia couldn&#039;t be aware of, even though she supposedly wrote the diary.<br /><br />Lastly, what was Scorpan even doing there? It&#039;s incredibly convenient for him to show up right when he was needed. He never even hints that it&#039;s because he sensed something wrong or had been following Tirek. He just appears at the perfect time to save the day.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 278

>>131038

I haven't completely gone through this yet, but I did want to go over why the first scene is important. In it, we establish the idea that Twilight's not fully in control of her magic, which will be on display when she yanks out the Cake's door. It also establishes the horseshoe game which how Twilight defeats the wyvern. Finally, the horseshoe that shows up later in Fluttershy's door is launched during the game between Twilight and Applejack.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131038" onclick="return highlight('131038', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131038">&gt;&gt;131038</a><br /><br />I haven&#039;t completely gone through this yet, but I did want to go over why the first scene is important. In it, we establish the idea that Twilight&#039;s not fully in control of her magic, which will be on display when she yanks out the Cake&#039;s door. It also establishes the horseshoe game which how Twilight defeats the wyvern. Finally, the horseshoe that shows up later in Fluttershy&#039;s door is launched during the game between Twilight and Applejack.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Sep 22nd, 2014 17:10</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 279

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“Y-you’re not afraid. You’re not afraid. You’re Rainbow Dash."//

Inconsistent quotation mark style.

>Ding dong.//

It's preferred to keep sound effects out of narration.

>hold up//

holdup

>Rainbow tried to meet Scootaloo’s Mother//

"Mother" wouldn't be capitalized in this sense. If it's a title that precedes the name or it's used as the name, then yes, but in this usage, it's generic. Same deal with her father.

>“C-can I come in now?” she said, adding in a tiny voice, “Please don’t tell anypony I jumped…”//

You can't really stitch together two separate sentences of dialogue like this. I bet you can find examples in published fiction where they do, but it'd be highly unusual. It creates the feel that both pieces of dialogue form a single sentence, but they don't.

>The few minutes they’d known each other was//

Number mismatch.

>Scootaloo’s father sighed, and stood back to let her in.//

That's all one clause. No need to put the comma in there.

>Something… shifted//

Extraneous space.

>‘Cause//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>don’t forget that can come home//

Missing word.

>a funny look//

How so? That's very vague. I have no way of deciphering the mother's thought process from this.

>Got a towel I can lend?//

Borrow, yes? Or do Brits use this backward?

>I promised I’d foalsit for you and that’s just what I’m gonna do.//

Opposite issue from before. There are two distinct subject-verb pairs here. There should be a comma between the clauses.

>the strange interior Scootaloo’s house//

Missing word.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>Scootaloo was fast asleep in a crib and she was tiny//

Needs a comma.

>Scoot’s here is my little trooper.//

Extraneous apostrophe.

>O.K.//

Spell it out as "okay."

>For as bad as she felt for little Scootaloo, Rainbow realised that she felt ten times worse for her mother.//

This is an awfully adult thing for her to realize with absolutely no preamble. I mean, it doesn't even occur to her to look at the wings. She immediately jumps to the conscientious attitude. That's pretty questionable for any eleven-year-old, and particularly one who shows as little tact as Dash. She's the one who's always blurting things out.

>sandy coloured//

>old fashioned//
Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>‘cos//

Backward apostrophe.

>as though she was//

For a hypothetical statement, use subjunctive mood: as though she were.

>‘em//

Just sweep for these. I'm not going to mark any more.

>It’s the only nice one I have and I haven’t worn it in almost a year.//

Needs a comma.

>looked at her with pride unending and love enormous//

This would carry a lot more weight if I had the slightest idea what it looked like. An emotional high point of the story isn't the time to be telly.

>Rainbow was here to be the most awesome foalsitter ever, she needed to focus.//

Comma splice.

>glared at her never blinking, never blinking,//

Is that repetition intentional? I'm not getting anything from it.

>there were so many that getting rid of them was impossible: so many different fears she had: the stress of trying to act older than she was; the worry that she wouldn’t be able to land her dream job on the weather team; the stark terror that other ponies wouldn’t think she was awesome, that would see right through her for the little phoney she was.//

Phony. This gets very clunky with the nested colons. Furthermore, in this limited narration it implies this as Dash's voice, yet I can't believe she thinks in a formal and structured way like this, mush less understanding the finer points of how to use a colon in the first place. You dno't want to lose the character's voice like this.

>Rainbow Dash shot up and the lights flickered wildly.//

Needs a comma.

>Pop.//

Again, watch the sound effects in narration. But this isolated word and the way the next sentence comes in doesn't do anything to create the feel of how this would have happened. Wouldn't it scare her? Both the sudden sound and the darkness? Yet her reaction is postponed until after all this is explained, and it's muted anyway, so it loses its immediacy and authenticity.

>with hot tears streaming down her face; with cheeks burning and nostrils clogged, and with the taste of something bitter upon her tongue, something unknown//

This really formal punctuation is losing the feel of Dash and of a child in general. Furthermore, the formalism of a semicolon doesn't really play well with sentence fragments.

>her parent’s bedroom//

She only has one?

>eleven year old//

Hyphenate all that.

>Cloudsdale.It//

Missing space. Why is she looking for such a circuitous route to Cloudsdale though? It's right near Ponyville. There wouldn't be a direct line?

>Money was running low but it would be enough.//

Needs a comma.

>Doing so would make her a sneak, of course, a wretch, a promise-breaker; but Cloudsdale was calling, and it's call couldn’t be ignored.//

Why wouldn't a comma do where you have a semicolon? You've also confused "it's" and "its."

>"Go.”//

This and the previous two lines have inconsistent quotation mark styles.

>the feel of the carpet against her hooves, rough and worn; the house smelled musty; the air tasted dank//

Unless they're part of a superlist, you really shouldn't be using more than one semicolon in a sentence.

>brawled//

She's in a fight? Or did you mean "bawled"?

>The foal wasn’t simply crying, she was far beyond that.//

Comma splice.

>rushing over to comfort the foal; but Scootaloo wouldn’t let Rainbow touch her//

Whenever you use both a semicolon and a conjunction, you should be asking yourself what the semicolon accomplishes that a comma wouldn't.

>run down//

Hyphenate.

>face caught halfway between terror and wonder, panic and curiosity//

Again, it'd mean a lot more if I got to see this.

>Then the light gave out plunging the two of them into darkness//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>For whomever had painted the stars//

Whoever. It's the subject of the clause "whoever had painted the stars."

>stars shined//

This is the transitive past tense. You want "shone."

>for although neither pony could know it, the lights were fuelled by love, and for months and months the long domant magic had been building and building and building: Rainbow Dash, without realizing it, had finally been the one to free it.//

Long-dormant. And this is incredibly blunt. Just let me see it happening. Show me the stars getting brighter and dimmer as they hug, pull away, whatever. A demonstration is much more powerful than heavy-handed exposition.

>You gonna fly//

Typo?

>herself –though//

Spacing.

This is a great story. It kind of gets undone by some punctuation choices that doesn't well reflect an eleven-year-old Dash, though, and it gets telly in a few wrong moments.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Y-you’re not afraid. You’re not afraid. You’re Rainbow Dash.&quot;//</span><br />Inconsistent quotation mark style.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Ding dong.</i>//</span><br />It&#039;s preferred to keep sound effects out of narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hold up//</span><br />holdup<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow tried to meet Scootaloo’s Mother//</span><br />&quot;Mother&quot; wouldn&#039;t be capitalized in this sense. If it&#039;s a title that precedes the name or it&#039;s used as the name, then yes, but in this usage, it&#039;s generic. Same deal with her father.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“C-can I come in now?” she said, adding in a tiny voice, “Please don’t tell anypony I jumped…”//</span><br />You can&#039;t really stitch together two separate sentences of dialogue like this. I bet you can find examples in published fiction where they do, but it&#039;d be highly unusual. It creates the feel that both pieces of dialogue form a single sentence, but they don&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The few minutes they’d known each other was//</span><br />Number mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo’s father sighed, and stood back to let her in.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. No need to put the comma in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Something… <i>shifted</i>//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>‘Cause</i>//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>don’t forget that can come home</i>//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a funny look//</span><br />How so? That&#039;s very vague. I have no way of deciphering the mother&#039;s thought process from this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Got a towel I can lend?//</span><br />Borrow, yes? Or do Brits use this backward?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I promised I’d foalsit for you and that’s just what I’m gonna do.//</span><br />Opposite issue from before. There are two distinct subject-verb pairs here. There should be a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the strange interior Scootaloo’s house//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scootaloo was fast asleep in a crib and she was tiny//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scoot’s here is my little trooper.//</span><br />Extraneous apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>O.K.</i>//</span><br />Spell it out as &quot;okay.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For as bad as she felt for little Scootaloo, Rainbow realised that she felt ten times worse for her mother.//</span><br />This is an awfully adult thing for her to realize with absolutely no preamble. I mean, it doesn&#039;t even occur to her to look at the wings. She immediately jumps to the conscientious attitude. That&#039;s pretty questionable for any eleven-year-old, and particularly one who shows as little tact as Dash. She&#039;s the one who&#039;s always blurting things out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sandy coloured//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;old fashioned//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cos//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as though she was//</span><br />For a hypothetical statement, use subjunctive mood: as though she were.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Just sweep for these. I&#039;m not going to mark any more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s the only nice one I have and I haven’t worn it in almost a year.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked at her with pride unending and love enormous//</span><br />This would carry a lot more weight if I had the slightest idea what it looked like. An emotional high point of the story isn&#039;t the time to be telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow was here to be the most awesome foalsitter ever, she needed to focus.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;glared at her never blinking, never blinking,//</span><br />Is that repetition intentional? I&#039;m not getting anything from it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;there were so many that getting rid of them was impossible: so many different fears she had: the stress of trying to act older than she was; the worry that she wouldn’t be able to land her dream job on the weather team; the stark terror that other ponies wouldn’t think she was awesome, that would see right through her for the little phoney she was.//</span><br />Phony. This gets very clunky with the nested colons. Furthermore, in this limited narration it implies this as Dash&#039;s voice, yet I can&#039;t believe she thinks in a formal and structured way like this, mush less understanding the finer points of how to use a colon in the first place. You dno&#039;t want to lose the character&#039;s voice like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash shot up and the lights flickered wildly.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Pop.</i>//</span><br />Again, watch the sound effects in narration. But this isolated word and the way the next sentence comes in doesn&#039;t do anything to create the feel of how this would have happened. Wouldn&#039;t it scare her? Both the sudden sound and the darkness? Yet her reaction is postponed until after all this is explained, and it&#039;s muted anyway, so it loses its immediacy and authenticity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with hot tears streaming down her face; with cheeks burning and nostrils clogged, and with the taste of something bitter upon her tongue, something unknown//</span><br />This really formal punctuation is losing the feel of Dash and of a child in general. Furthermore, the formalism of a semicolon doesn&#039;t really play well with sentence fragments.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her parent’s bedroom//</span><br />She only has one?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eleven year old//</span><br />Hyphenate all that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cloudsdale.It//</span><br />Missing space. Why is she looking for such a circuitous route to Cloudsdale though? It&#039;s right near Ponyville. There wouldn&#039;t be a direct line?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Money was running low but it would be enough.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Doing so would make her a sneak, of course, a wretch, a promise-breaker; but Cloudsdale was calling, and it&#039;s call couldn’t be ignored.//</span><br />Why wouldn&#039;t a comma do where you have a semicolon? You&#039;ve also confused &quot;it&#039;s&quot; and &quot;its.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>&quot;Go.”</i>//</span><br />This and the previous two lines have inconsistent quotation mark styles.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the feel of the carpet against her hooves, rough and worn; the house smelled musty; the air tasted dank//</span><br />Unless they&#039;re part of a superlist, you really shouldn&#039;t be using more than one semicolon in a sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brawled//</span><br />She&#039;s in a fight? Or did you mean &quot;bawled&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The foal wasn’t simply crying, she was far beyond that.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rushing over to comfort the foal; but Scootaloo wouldn’t let Rainbow touch her//</span><br />Whenever you use both a semicolon and a conjunction, you should be asking yourself what the semicolon accomplishes that a comma wouldn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;run down//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;face caught halfway between terror and wonder, panic and curiosity//</span><br />Again, it&#039;d mean a lot more if I got to see this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then the light gave out plunging the two of them into darkness//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For whomever had painted the stars//</span><br />Whoever. It&#039;s the subject of the clause &quot;whoever had painted the stars.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stars shined//</span><br />This is the transitive past tense. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for although neither pony could know it, the lights were fuelled by love, and for months and months the long domant magic had been building and building and building: Rainbow Dash, without realizing it, had finally been the one to free it.//</span><br />Long-dormant. And this is incredibly blunt. Just let me see it happening. Show me the stars getting brighter and dimmer as they hug, pull away, whatever. A demonstration is much more powerful than heavy-handed exposition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You gonna fly//</span><br />Typo?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;herself –though//</span><br />Spacing.<br /><br />This is a great story. It kind of gets undone by some punctuation choices that doesn&#039;t well reflect an eleven-year-old Dash, though, and it gets telly in a few wrong moments.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 280

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>that that//

Repeated word.

>sighed contently//

Usually "contentedly."

>she could simply lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>sun finally peaked over the distant hills//

Peak/peek confusion.

>she would be made to bow in terror//

Note how much passive voice and how many "to be" verbs are already in this scene. They both bring the action to a screeching halt. You should be choosing more active verbs.

>with amusement//

Prepositional phrases that communicate a mood or emotion like this are almost always throwaway things. Show her acting amused; don't just tell me that she is.

>something- the//

Please use a proper dash.

>She stood stock still, eyes locked on the sky, filling steadily with confusion and a little unease.//

This is a turning point in the story and, as such, emotionally significant. Now's not the time to be telly. The modifier is also misplaced; It's seemingly the sky that is filling with confusion and unease.

>It's pale light//

Its/it's confusion.

>For several long moments she simply stood there, trying to still the nervous beating of her heart.//

Look how often you use participial phrases. I'm wading through quite a lot of them. They are a nicely descriptive element, but they're often abused by writers who are just starting to gain some experience and worry about variation of sentence structure. However, these more complex forms stand out much more easily, so they're easy to overuse. They also have their own attendant problems, but I'll point those out later if I see them. I have already noted one misplaced modifier.

>she began muttering "it's//

Missing comma and capitalization.

>shouted out "IT'S JUST A DREAM!"//

Missing comma, and italics are preferred for emphasis.

>her defiant expression softened into something that resembled shame//

Writing is much more powerful when you get me to deduce these emotions rather than bluntly informing me of them.

>thing.

>
>Those things//
Watch the repetition.

>and although it was a dream//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>there's no point in-//

Use a dash.

>Releasing a breath that she hadn't realized she'd been holding//

This is a very cliched phrase. And, for that matter, the fourth participial phrase in this paragraph alone.

>this is MY dream place//

The way to emphasize something that's already in italics is to put it in normal font.

>"What will you do, sun worshiper"//

Missing the question mark.

>"Has your precious princess"-she turned right-"taught you ANYTHING"-she whipped around-"that can help you now?"//

Dashes.

>as though the bone was being injected with freezing acid//

For a hypothetical statement, use subjunctive mood: as though the bone were.

>I want the citizens of Equestria to see the sun for what it is; a garish thing that serves only to blind sight and sear flesh.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it. You're defining/clarifying here, so a colon would work.

>and when it returned //

Comma for the dependent clause.

>By this point//

This kind of phrase is always a very self-aware thing for the narrator to say. It really only works well for a limited narrator, and while you're taking a mostly limited tone in the filly's perspective, this is rather detached from her point of view to work with it. It's dispassionate, while the filly is at an emotional high point.

>as though it were the most obviously thing//

Typo.

>taking a step forward//

You'll normally set of participles with commas.

>"I know that whatever you are, you won't even show your face. What kind of empress is afraid to show her face?"//

You already had Nightmare Moon speak in this paragraph. You need to start a new one to have the filly speak.

>Emboldened by the fact that she was getting under her tormentor's skin//

You're doing a lot of telling in this story, but this is closer to over-explaining. It's a lot more interesting when the reader can figure out this kind of thing on his own.

>Her taunting was cut off//

The cutoff needed a dash, but I've marked enough of those. Suffice it to say you need to replace a lot of hyphens with dashes. Here, though, we already know it was cut off from the punctuation. You don't need to reiterate it in the narration.

>as the face she'd seen so briefly before came into focus through the haze.//

Here's a related issue to all the participles: every sentence in this paragraph has an "as" clause.

>Run little filly, run.//

Direct address takes commas on both sides.

>grit//

The only accepted past tense is "gritted."

>; all were gone.//

Misused semicolon.

>Hot tears immediately began pouring down her cheeks as she dragged her abused body to her bed of ferns and collapsed, weeping with relief all the while. As the eastern sky gradually brightened, she sobbed and laughed in equal measure, letting the accumulated terror of the past several hours run down her snout before dripping onto the ground. She couldn't help but feel measurably lighter as the edge of the sun first peeked out from behind the mountains, and yet more joyful tears ran down her face as it took its rightful place, crowning the trees in front of her and wrapping her in the embrace of its light and warmth.//

Just look at this paragraph. Three sentences, four "as" clauses, and five participial phrases.

>With every step she took//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>cast down, never to cast//

>truly understand, it must be delivered by somepony she truly//
Watch the repetition.

>Prepare yourself my little filly//

Comma for direct address.

>Celestia's horn flared and the great doors to her bedroom sprang open.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Something ails thy student!//

You've got kind of a mix of speech here. Try to be consistent. "aileth"

>she requires//

requireth

>silver flecked//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>She stepped passed//

Passed/past confusion.

>Calm thyself Morning Glory//

Comma for direct address.

>You're safe now.//

Why is she slipping into a more modern and informal speech pattern here?

>Celestia asked "What//

Missing comma.

>There's no hope Princess.//

>There's no hope for you Princess.//
Comma for direct address.

>and if I try//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>she managed the breathe out//

Typo.

>she'd sooner mate with a hydra//

This is seriously out of place. Humor was the last thing this scene needed.

>and send for us//

Is she using "us" in the sense of the royal We? If so, capitalize it.

>"I wonder what the nobles would have thought of that? Such impropriety!"//

This comes out of left field. I don't buy it as a reasonable response for anyone there to make, and it's pretty transparently there to ratchet up the drama.

>buck themselves from the highest peak of Mount Unity//

See previous note about humor. Also, use of "buck" as profanity is highly cliched.

>"are you well Luna?"//

Capitalization and comma for direct address.

>and when they rose again//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>pleading 'No, no, no'.//

Missing comma, and the period goes inside the quotes.

>Her expression tightened, which Luna recognized as a sign that she was struggling not to cry.//

Again, over-explained and unsubtle.

>my students eyes//

Missing apostrophe.

>As much as she disliked Morning Glory//

Why bring this in now? What bearing does it have on the story? You can't just toss a Chekhov's Gun in there.

>she said 'The sun will fall'.//

Missing comma, period goes inside the quotes.

>but until she could explore it further//

>and if that is so//
Comma for the dependent clause.

>Celestia giving her a look a genuine worry//

Another example where you'd do better to let me see it than make me take your word for what the emotion was.

>Please be careful, sister.//

>Goodnight, sister.//
When used as a title, term of address, or substitute for a name, "Sister" gets capitalized.

>Goodnight Luna.//

Comma for direct address.

>Oh sister//

Capitalization and comma.

Okay, that ending wasn't really an ending. Everything's indeterminate. She wonders if she's losing control, but she doesn't come to a conclusion. Glory's fate is up in the air. At least you built up some tension, so this might slide, but it didn't go anywhere.

The biggest issues, then. There's quite a bit of telly language. It didn't start out that way, but it got worse as it went on. There's a discussion about it under "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

There are a few issues with repetition of words, but most often, this came up as overuse of a few things: "as" clauses, participial phrases, and "to be" verbs. A word about that last one: These are inherently boring verbs. It's impractical to get rid of them entirely, but it's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You need to choose more active verbs. Of the easier forms to search, I counted 219, which is almost one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. Even some of the events got repetitive in the dream world, as it felt like several moments ran together as rehashing the same things.

I estimate there are about 100 quotes in your story. Many are unattributed, but still, you only used "said" 8 times. I won't go into the explanation here; there's a discussion up top about that too, under "saidisms."

Lastly, I can't tell how old Morning Glory is. The reason it matters is that you use a fairly subjective narrator, and in that case, you want the narration to take on the relative intelligence level and mannerisms of the focus character. Yet the narration was pretty indistinguishable whether it was keeping with her, Celestia, or Luna. I can at least see Celestia and Luna being very similar, but when Morning Glory's narration was rather purple and had a lot of advanced word choice, it just didn't carry the feeling of a child, even one who may be intelligent. There's a limit to what you can do and still keep a childlike mood. Everyone else refers to her as a filly, after all, but the narration didn't match.

After all that, though, I will say that this was well-written. It didn't suffer from a huge variety of mechanical problems, mostly multiple instances of the same ones. Really, it's in better mechanical shape than most stories we see. Where it's not repetitive, in structure, the prose flows well, and the dream scenes built up tension nicely.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that that//</span><br />Repeated word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sighed contently//</span><br />Usually &quot;contentedly.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she could simply lay down//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sun finally peaked over the distant hills//</span><br />Peak/peek confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she would be made to bow in terror//</span><br />Note how much passive voice and how many &quot;to be&quot; verbs are already in this scene. They both bring the action to a screeching halt. You should be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with amusement//</span><br />Prepositional phrases that communicate a mood or emotion like this are almost always throwaway things. Show her acting amused; don&#039;t just tell me that she is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>something</i>- the//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stood stock still, eyes locked on the sky, filling steadily with confusion and a little unease.//</span><br />This is a turning point in the story and, as such, emotionally significant. Now&#039;s not the time to be telly. The modifier is also misplaced; It&#039;s seemingly the sky that is filling with confusion and unease.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s pale light//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For several long moments she simply stood there, trying to still the nervous beating of her heart.//</span><br />Look how often you use participial phrases. I&#039;m wading through quite a lot of them. They are a nicely descriptive element, but they&#039;re often abused by writers who are just starting to gain some experience and worry about variation of sentence structure. However, these more complex forms stand out much more easily, so they&#039;re easy to overuse. They also have their own attendant problems, but I&#039;ll point those out later if I see them. I have already noted one misplaced modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she began muttering &quot;it&#039;s//</span><br />Missing comma and capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shouted out &quot;IT&#039;S JUST A DREAM!&quot;//</span><br />Missing comma, and italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her defiant expression softened into something that resembled shame//</span><br />Writing is much more powerful when you get me to deduce these emotions rather than bluntly informing me of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thing.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Those things//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and although it was a dream//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>there&#039;s no point in-</i>//</span><br />Use a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Releasing a breath that she hadn&#039;t realized she&#039;d been holding//</span><br />This is a very cliched phrase. And, for that matter, the fourth participial phrase in this paragraph alone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>this is MY dream place</i>//</span><br />The way to emphasize something that&#039;s already in italics is to put it in normal font.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;What will you do, sun worshiper&quot;//</span><br />Missing the question mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Has your precious princess&quot;-she turned right-&quot;taught you ANYTHING&quot;-she whipped around-&quot;that can help you now?&quot;//</span><br />Dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as though the bone was being injected with freezing acid//</span><br />For a hypothetical statement, use subjunctive mood: as though the bone were.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I want the citizens of Equestria to see the sun for what it is; a garish thing that serves only to blind sight and sear flesh.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it. You&#039;re defining/clarifying here, so a colon would work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when it returned //</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;By this point//</span><br />This kind of phrase is always a very self-aware thing for the narrator to say. It really only works well for a limited narrator, and while you&#039;re taking a mostly limited tone in the filly&#039;s perspective, this is rather detached from her point of view to work with it. It&#039;s dispassionate, while the filly is at an emotional high point.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as though it were the most obviously thing//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taking a step forward//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set of participles with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I know that whatever you are, you won&#039;t even show your face. What kind of empress is afraid to show her face?&quot;//</span><br />You already had Nightmare Moon speak in this paragraph. You need to start a new one to have the filly speak.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Emboldened by the fact that she was getting under her tormentor&#039;s skin//</span><br />You&#039;re doing a lot of telling in this story, but this is closer to over-explaining. It&#039;s a lot more interesting when the reader can figure out this kind of thing on his own.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her taunting was cut off//</span><br />The cutoff needed a dash, but I&#039;ve marked enough of those. Suffice it to say you need to replace a lot of hyphens with dashes. Here, though, we already know it was cut off from the punctuation. You don&#039;t need to reiterate it in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as the face she&#039;d seen so briefly before came into focus through the haze.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a related issue to all the participles: every sentence in this paragraph has an &quot;as&quot; clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Run little filly, run.//</span><br />Direct address takes commas on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;grit//</span><br />The only accepted past tense is &quot;gritted.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;; all were gone.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hot tears immediately began pouring down her cheeks as she dragged her abused body to her bed of ferns and collapsed, weeping with relief all the while. As the eastern sky gradually brightened, she sobbed and laughed in equal measure, letting the accumulated terror of the past several hours run down her snout before dripping onto the ground. She couldn&#039;t help but feel measurably lighter as the edge of the sun first peeked out from behind the mountains, and yet more joyful tears ran down her face as it took its rightful place, crowning the trees in front of her and wrapping her in the embrace of its light and warmth.//</span><br />Just look at this paragraph. Three sentences, four &quot;as&quot; clauses, and five participial phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With every step she took//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cast down, never to cast//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;truly understand, it must be delivered by somepony she truly//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Prepare yourself my little filly//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia&#039;s horn flared and the great doors to her bedroom sprang open.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Something ails thy student!//</span><br />You&#039;ve got kind of a mix of speech here. Try to be consistent. &quot;aileth&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she requires//</span><br />requireth<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;silver flecked//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stepped passed//</span><br />Passed/past confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Calm thyself Morning Glory//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You&#039;re safe now.//</span><br />Why is she slipping into a more modern and informal speech pattern here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia asked &quot;What//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s no hope Princess.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s no hope for you Princess.//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if I try//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she managed the breathe out//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she&#039;d sooner mate with a hydra//</span><br />This is seriously out of place. Humor was the last thing this scene needed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and send for us//</span><br />Is she using &quot;us&quot; in the sense of the royal We? If so, capitalize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I wonder what the nobles would have thought of that? Such impropriety!&quot;//</span><br />This comes out of left field. I don&#039;t buy it as a reasonable response for anyone there to make, and it&#039;s pretty transparently there to ratchet up the drama.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;buck themselves from the highest peak of Mount Unity//</span><br />See previous note about humor. Also, use of &quot;buck&quot; as profanity is highly cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;are you well Luna?&quot;//</span><br />Capitalization and comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when they rose again//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pleading &#039;No, no, no&#039;.//</span><br />Missing comma, and the period goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her expression tightened, which Luna recognized as a sign that she was struggling not to cry.//</span><br />Again, over-explained and unsubtle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my students eyes//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As much as she disliked Morning Glory//</span><br />Why bring this in now? What bearing does it have on the story? You can&#039;t just toss a Chekhov&#039;s Gun in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she said &#039;The sun will fall&#039;.//</span><br />Missing comma, period goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but until she could explore it further//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if that is so//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia giving her a look a genuine worry//</span><br />Another example where you&#039;d do better to let me see it than make me take your word for what the emotion was.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Please be careful, sister.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Goodnight, sister.//</span><br />When used as a title, term of address, or substitute for a name, &quot;Sister&quot; gets capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Goodnight Luna.//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh sister//</span><br />Capitalization and comma.<br /><br />Okay, that ending wasn&#039;t really an ending. Everything&#039;s indeterminate. She wonders if she&#039;s losing control, but she doesn&#039;t come to a conclusion. Glory&#039;s fate is up in the air. At least you built up some tension, so this might slide, but it didn&#039;t go anywhere.<br /><br />The biggest issues, then. There&#039;s quite a bit of telly language. It didn&#039;t start out that way, but it got worse as it went on. There&#039;s a discussion about it under &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br />There are a few issues with repetition of words, but most often, this came up as overuse of a few things: &quot;as&quot; clauses, participial phrases, and &quot;to be&quot; verbs. A word about that last one: These are inherently boring verbs. It&#039;s impractical to get rid of them entirely, but it&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is. You need to choose more active verbs. Of the easier forms to search, I counted 219, which is almost one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen. Even some of the events got repetitive in the dream world, as it felt like several moments ran together as rehashing the same things.<br /><br />I estimate there are about 100 quotes in your story. Many are unattributed, but still, you only used &quot;said&quot; 8 times. I won&#039;t go into the explanation here; there&#039;s a discussion up top about that too, under &quot;saidisms.&quot;<br /><br />Lastly, I can&#039;t tell how old Morning Glory is. The reason it matters is that you use a fairly subjective narrator, and in that case, you want the narration to take on the relative intelligence level and mannerisms of the focus character. Yet the narration was pretty indistinguishable whether it was keeping with her, Celestia, or Luna. I can at least see Celestia and Luna being very similar, but when Morning Glory&#039;s narration was rather purple and had a lot of advanced word choice, it just didn&#039;t carry the feeling of a child, even one who may be intelligent. There&#039;s a limit to what you can do and still keep a childlike mood. Everyone else refers to her as a filly, after all, but the narration didn&#039;t match.<br /><br />After all that, though, I will say that this was well-written. It didn&#039;t suffer from a huge variety of mechanical problems, mostly multiple instances of the same ones. Really, it&#039;s in better mechanical shape than most stories we see. Where it&#039;s not repetitive, in structure, the prose flows well, and the dream scenes built up tension nicely.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 281

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

><Do it, Star.>//

This formatting is really ugly. The usual way to show dialogue that is different in some way is through italics. I'd encourage you to do so here, either with or without quotation marks. Actually, with quotes would work better, since you render her thoughts without them.

>She was first approached just over a year ago, and has been in training ever since.//

Verb tense in the second part. You also don't need that comma, since it's all a single clause, and not a particularly complex one at that. There are some guidelines on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>Amethyst's horn was glowing in a raspberry aura, ready and willing to use her special brand of magic to cleave into the terrorist leader in front of her.//

The way this is worded attributes the "ready and willing" attitude to her horn, which is odd.

>I'm pretty sure the essay portion on your first test was over that//

A more usual phrasing would be "went over that" or "covered that."

>and although ordinarily she would also close her eyes in concentration//

This time, there are separate clauses, so it needs a comma. Read over the section on show versus tell, too. Not that you're being telly, but it explains why that "in concentration" phrase is extraneous. With nothing there, just closing her eyes doesn't do enough to get at her mood, though. There's a fine shade of meaning here, but I think you'd do fine replacing that with "to concentrate." This gets at her purpose without framing it as an emotion necessarily.

>So let me get the straight//

Typo.

><So let me get the straight,> the voice said, drawing out each syllable, <You're//

Also look at the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization. The quick answer is that "you're" should be lower case, since it continues a sentence instead of starting one. And I think you meant "the" to be "this" or "that."

>lights flashed in that dark and dank basement and blinded Amethyst//

If lights flashed, it's not exactly dark and dank anymore, is it? Might want to put a "formerly" in here.

>blinded Amethyst. From what she could tell in that instant, the blinding//

Watch the close repetition of words or phrases.

>One in particular stood in front; not a griffon, but a pony.//

A semicolon really does suggest a formality of style that doesn't play well with sentence fragments. A colon would work, since you're clarifying. A dash would too.

>mint colored//

Hyphenate compound modifiers.

>coat covered the hooves//

Really?

>Amethyst ,//

Extraneous space.

>and as she raised her head to look the pony in the face//

Another dependent clause that needs a comma.

>with satisfaction//

Another example of this telly kind of phrase. You can do better than this.

>The two mares were now back in Ponies Protecting Ponies headquarters.//

There are far more elegant ways of demonstrating this than bluntly saying it. The description of the office, the nameplate on a door, the other characters around…

>the last genuine threat Equestria witnessed took place almost one thousand years ago//

Verb tense. It's a completed action in a past-tense narration, so use past perfect tense: had taken.

>"And we aim to keep it that way," Lyra Heartstrings would say whenever the topic was brought up. She wasn't the highest ranking member of the PPP, but her record on the field alone was enough to gain respect within the company. She was the first to approach Amethyst when the young pink mare was still working a humble stand in Canterlot's marketplace, and volunteered to both train and supervise the newcomer.//

This is a common problem, but one that needs addressing. Look at the sheer number of "to be" verbs here. These are boring verbs. Nothing happens. It simply is. It's much more interesting to read about what happens. You ought to be choosing more active verbs. It's impractical to purge them entirely, but you could reduce them a lot. You have five in this paragraph alone. In this chapter, of the easier forms to search, I count 123, which is about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. It's a subtle thing, but active verbs give your story more of a sense of motion, even when there isn't motion happening, like "he sat there" versus "he was there."

>NEED//

Italics are preferred for emphasis.

>Even if he was an actual a terrorist?//

Extraneous word.

>this was the briefing room//

Blunt and boring. We'll already gather its function from what goes on to happen in there.

>but every time she did//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Lyra came off as a bit harsh at times, but every time she did Amethyst could spot a smile underneath it all.//

I do want to point out this sentence. It's not an easy thing to keep a tight control on your narrator's perspective. Perspective can shift, of course, but it has to handled carefully. You've done a good job keeping in Star's head, though, couching other's emotions as her perception of them instead of just leaping into their points of view to inform the reader of such. I hope you continue to do so.

>Amethyst followed Lyra into the center of the console//

Just "to." Otherwise, that sounds rather uncomfortable.

>inquired an annoyed Amethyst .//

Extraneous space. And don't just say she's annoyed. Get me to figure out she is through her body language and actions.

>Amethyst couldn't tell if Lyra was being sarcastic, especially since she wasn't sure if the agency did have a detective division or not.//

This is really your call, but if you're going to keep with her perspective, there may not be much of an advantage to keeping the narrator external to her like this. A more subjective narrator can speak her thoughts for her. For instance: "Was Lyra being sarcastic? Did they even have a detective division?" This forges a closer emotional bond between the character and the reader instead of sounding dispassionately factual. It creates a more personal voice. If you're not comfortable writing narration in that fashion, though, what you have isn't wrong.

>purple unicorn//

It's getting a bit repetitive that you keep using this phrase, especially since her name's already been given. With Star as the focus character, if you wanted to show that she hadn't picked it up that well yet, a subjective narration again can take on her voice, if you choose: "Amethyst eyed the mare—Twilight… Sparkle—warily."

>in disbelief//

Again, there are better ways of showing this that just stating it.

>she started slow//

slowly

>Lyra shot Amethyst a look//

This is incredibly vague.

>asked Amethyst almost completely monotone//

Odd phrasing. The syntax is off here.

>perking up//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>the way they came//

Tense issue again. "Had come."

>Amethyst could feel the back of her neck heating up, and wasn't sure if she was supposed to say anything.//

All one clause. No comma.

>looked as though he as going to say something//

Typo.

>us?//

You'll normally italicize ! or ? when on an italicized word.

>When both mares opened their mouths//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>as though it was//

When making hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: as though it were.

>Two more mares — unicorns, in fact — disembarked and both the chariot and the stallions pulling it disappeared back into the clouds.//

Comma between the clauses.

>The mint-green one unicorn//

Extraneous word.

>blue and pink-striped//

Hyphenate all that.

>the green unicorn asked//

We know their names. You're going a bit overboard on the LUS here. In case you don't know what that is, there's a section up top about it.

>Carrot explained to the confused look on Amethyst's face//

She explained it to the look? That's a really odd phrasing.

>audible growl could be heard//

Is there another kind of growl? And if it's audible, isn't it redundant to say it "could be heard"?

>"That's a shame," said Lyra. "Sounds like you would have been more fun."//

Look how much of this conversation is structurally similar. Paragraph after paragraph goes "Speech," she said. ("Possibly more speech.") And those "she said" parts don't have the characters doing much more than speaking. Don't lose sight of the fact that they're actually doing things other than speaking. Half of a conversation is nonverbal anyway. There's a section on "talking heads" that will explain why ths is a bad thing.

>custom designed//

Hyphenate.

>brightly covered ribbons//

"Colored," yes?

>Now the streamers; pink or blue?//

Misused semicolon. This could be a colon, dash, or period, depending on what inflection you want.

>All right, ladies; pick a stall.//

Another misused semicolon. This one should just be a comma.

>girls room

girls'

>Yeah, but— That's not what— What if— But that doesn't— What?//

You'd either put a space on both sides of the dash or neither. And you don't really need to capitalize all those. There is a rationale for doing so, but honestly, it'd be lost on the vast majority of readers.

>hustle-and-bustle//

You don't need those hyphens. It's a compound noun, not a modifier.

>Canterlonian//

Typo.

>Bon Bon trailed off.//

Yes. I can tell from the ellipsis.

>Wait: are you about to tell me this thing cures the common cold?//

A colon is a really odd choice here. Why not just use a comma?

>cutting him off//

Again, already evident from the punctuation.

>A cheery, yet bored voice greeted them.//

You don't need that comma, but if you want it there, you need to pair it with one at the end of the aside.

>not the least bit amused//

Don't just tell me. Let me see it and judge for myself. Keep an eye out for places where your narrator bluntly tells me how a character feels. Is it an important moment in the story? Is it something you want the reader to identify with? Then show me. If it's a minor detail at a fleeting moment, then it's not so bad to tell.

>that when Princess Celestia formed this company//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>citizen that//

A citizen is a "who," not a "that."

>the sister that//

Same deal.

>one thousand-year-old//

Hyphenate all that, but it might sound more natural if you just dropped the "one."

>"Flattering," Lyra sneered.//

That's a facial expression, not a speaking action.

>The two unicorns looked at one another before back to Carrot Top//

Missing word.

>At the center of the mass was the unicorn renting out the space for the night, Twilight Sparkle, and the bouncing pink pony behind the party now taking place inside of it.//

That's pretty convoluted.

>She certainly does like meeting new ponies, doesn't she,//

That's a question, isn't it?

>fixated//

This doesn't mean the same thing as "fixed."

>I take it your Agent Doo?//

Your/you're confusion.

>The conversation was interrupted by the sound of a steam whistle nearby//

Then just have the whistle sound. Don't distance me from it by wedging a narrative comment in there. It undercuts the suddenness.

>eying the party guests warily//

You have to be careful placing participles. They like to modify the nearest prior object. Really this describes the staircase, but it's easy to rule that out. But the most recent viable object is Lyra. It's unclear whether you actually mean her or Star.

>VIP's//

You don't need the apostrophe.

>and being primarily an earth pony town at the time//

Comma to set off the absolute phrase.

>pegasi recruitment//

Noun adjuncts are singular.

>just one?" Amethyst looked up to see just one//

Watch the repetition.

>No; both//

You really use a lot of semicolons where they aren't warranted. And while your use of colons is mostly correct, you do it so often that they stand out as a writing tic. You don't want them drawing attention away from the story like that.

>This is an advantage; not a handicap.//

Misused semicolon.

>but before she could respond//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Lyra's voice could be heard from the same direction//

I don't see the advantage of putting this in passive voice.

>Lyra gave Derpy a look//

That's incredibly vague. It could mean almost anything.

>Look, I'm going to check in with HQ; stepping outside for a bit.//

Misused semicolon.

>I'm sure once we're all back at HQ and have Bon Bon breathing down our necks //

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Many games were played well into the night, and most of the refreshments were downed by some pony or another.//

More inexplicable passive voice.

>"I grew up in Canterlot, so, yes, of course," Amethyst laughed.//

This is why "laugh" often makes a poor speaking verb. It'd be hard to laugh all that, especially with the pauses.

>weeding out//

Hyphenate.

>Both ponies laughed.//

This is the third laugh in less than half a screen, and the first of those three had nearly the identical phrasing.

>to not//

I normally don't force writers to avoid split infinitives, but this kind is so easy to fix. Just reverse these words.

>so between that and the big security threat we may have//

Coma for the dependent clause. It took me a while even to parse this sentence as is. A comma will really help keep it organized.

>asked the white unicorn who decorated Town Hall//

It's in the story's past. Use past perfect tense.

>When the tiny dragon circled the ground with his foot//

Same. And I don't know what "circled the ground with his foot" means. Is he twisting it? Scuffing it around? Walking a lap?

>We can play again before you and Twilight go back to Canterlot; how does that sound?//

Another issue with all these colons and semicolons: It tends to make all these character voices run together. You want them to be more distinctive.

>The white unicorn looked to the pink party master, who also nodded.//

The LUS is really getting to me. In this case, Star already knows Pinkie's name. And why wouldn't their mission briefing have included Rarity and Spike?

>she'll say upstairs in bed//

"Stay," right?

>said the green unicorn//

And the LUS is especially rankling when Star, your focus character, definitely knows the names.

>birds' songs//

"Birdsong" would work better.

>addressing the crowd//

Redundant.

>Bon Bon's voice cut her off.//

That was already apparent.

>What?!" Lyra hissed. "And you picked me?!

When ! or ? is on an italicized word, you'll normally italicize it as well.

I'll also note the wavering perspective in this scene. Take this line:
>She could see both Bon Bon and the subject of her sentence clearly.//
Only Carrot Top knows this, so she holds the perspective. Then just a few sentences later:
>a look of pure childlike wonder was plastered across the pony's face//
I actually can't tell whether this refers to Star or Lyra, but this has switched to the perspective of whoever is observing the other here.
>Amethyst couldn't help but feel bad for her partner//
And now we're in Star's head. There are times a shifting perspective can work, but it's going to be especially confusing here where I already have a lot of characters to keep track of. It also keeps me from getting settled with any one character and identifying with her. Since Star is the new girl, and the story's as much about her learning the ropes as going over these security missions, you'd probably do better by staying in her perspective, except where you want to get into scenes where she's not present.
>Bon Bon turned to glare at Lyra, only to see that she was already a few paces back. She wasn't returning any looks; instead, Lyra looked far too thrilled about what was being said on stage.//
And now we're in Bon Bon's head.
>Amethyst watched the encounter from afar, and couldn't help but chuckle to herself.//
Very next sentence, and back to Star. That comma can go, by the way; this is all one clause.

>close Twilight was to all of them, but before she could ask if they were close//

Repetition.

>and when she looked back to Twilight//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>the studious pony saw//

Verb tense.

>THIS//

Italics are preferred over all caps.

>Horns blared and a curtain was pulled at the front balcony//

Comma between the clauses, and why the passive voice?

>the unicorn who pulled the curtain//

Verb tense.

>the citizens Ponyville//

Missing word.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&lt;Do it, Star.&gt;//</span><br />This formatting is really ugly. The usual way to show dialogue that is different in some way is through italics. I&#039;d encourage you to do so here, either with or without quotation marks. Actually, with quotes would work better, since you render her thoughts without them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was first approached just over a year ago, and has been in training ever since.//</span><br />Verb tense in the second part. You also don&#039;t need that comma, since it&#039;s all a single clause, and not a particularly complex one at that. There are some guidelines on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst&#039;s horn was glowing in a raspberry aura, ready and willing to use her special brand of magic to cleave into the terrorist leader in front of her.//</span><br />The way this is worded attributes the &quot;ready and willing&quot; attitude to her horn, which is odd.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m pretty sure the essay portion on your first test was over that//</span><br />A more usual phrasing would be &quot;went over that&quot; or &quot;covered that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and although ordinarily she would also close her eyes in concentration//</span><br />This time, there are separate clauses, so it needs a comma. Read over the section on show versus tell, too. Not that you&#039;re being telly, but it explains why that &quot;in concentration&quot; phrase is extraneous. With nothing there, just closing her eyes doesn&#039;t do enough to get at her mood, though. There&#039;s a fine shade of meaning here, but I think you&#039;d do fine replacing that with &quot;to concentrate.&quot; This gets at her purpose without framing it as an emotion necessarily.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So let me get the straight//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&lt;So let me get the straight,&gt; the voice said, drawing out each syllable, &lt;You&#039;re//</span><br />Also look at the section on dialogue punctuation and capitalization. The quick answer is that &quot;you&#039;re&quot; should be lower case, since it continues a sentence instead of starting one. And I think you meant &quot;the&quot; to be &quot;this&quot; or &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lights flashed in that dark and dank basement and blinded Amethyst//</span><br />If lights flashed, it&#039;s not exactly dark and dank anymore, is it? Might want to put a &quot;formerly&quot; in here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blinded Amethyst. From what she could tell in that instant, the blinding//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words or phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One in particular stood in front; not a griffon, but a pony.//</span><br />A semicolon really does suggest a formality of style that doesn&#039;t play well with sentence fragments. A colon would work, since you&#039;re clarifying. A dash would too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mint colored//</span><br />Hyphenate compound modifiers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;coat covered the hooves//</span><br />Really?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst ,//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and as she raised her head to look the pony in the face//</span><br />Another dependent clause that needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with satisfaction//</span><br />Another example of this telly kind of phrase. You can do better than this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two mares were now back in Ponies Protecting Ponies headquarters.//</span><br />There are far more elegant ways of demonstrating this than bluntly saying it. The description of the office, the nameplate on a door, the other characters around…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the last genuine threat Equestria witnessed took place almost one thousand years ago//</span><br />Verb tense. It&#039;s a completed action in a past-tense narration, so use past perfect tense: had taken.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;And we aim to keep it that way,&quot; Lyra Heartstrings would say whenever the topic was brought up. She wasn&#039;t the highest ranking member of the PPP, but her record on the field alone was enough to gain respect within the company. She was the first to approach Amethyst when the young pink mare was still working a humble stand in Canterlot&#039;s marketplace, and volunteered to both train and supervise the newcomer.//</span><br />This is a common problem, but one that needs addressing. Look at the sheer number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs here. These are boring verbs. Nothing happens. It simply is. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about what happens. You ought to be choosing more active verbs. It&#039;s impractical to purge them entirely, but you could reduce them a lot. You have five in this paragraph alone. In this chapter, of the easier forms to search, I count 123, which is about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen. It&#039;s a subtle thing, but active verbs give your story more of a sense of motion, even when there isn&#039;t motion happening, like &quot;he sat there&quot; versus &quot;he was there.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;NEED//</span><br />Italics are preferred for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even if he was an actual a terrorist?//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this was the briefing room//</span><br />Blunt and boring. We&#039;ll already gather its function from what goes on to happen in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but every time she did//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra came off as a bit harsh at times, but every time she did Amethyst could spot a smile underneath it all.//</span><br />I do want to point out this sentence. It&#039;s not an easy thing to keep a tight control on your narrator&#039;s perspective. Perspective can shift, of course, but it has to handled carefully. You&#039;ve done a good job keeping in Star&#039;s head, though, couching other&#039;s emotions as her perception of them instead of just leaping into their points of view to inform the reader of such. I hope you continue to do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst followed Lyra into the center of the console//</span><br />Just &quot;to.&quot; Otherwise, that sounds rather uncomfortable.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;inquired an annoyed Amethyst .//</span><br />Extraneous space. And don&#039;t just say she&#039;s annoyed. Get me to figure out she is through her body language and actions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst couldn&#039;t tell if Lyra was being sarcastic, especially since she wasn&#039;t sure if the agency did have a detective division or not.//</span><br />This is really your call, but if you&#039;re going to keep with her perspective, there may not be much of an advantage to keeping the narrator external to her like this. A more subjective narrator can speak her thoughts for her. For instance: &quot;Was Lyra being sarcastic? Did they even have a detective division?&quot; This forges a closer emotional bond between the character and the reader instead of sounding dispassionately factual. It creates a more personal voice. If you&#039;re not comfortable writing narration in that fashion, though, what you have isn&#039;t wrong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;purple unicorn//</span><br />It&#039;s getting a bit repetitive that you keep using this phrase, especially since her name&#039;s already been given. With Star as the focus character, if you wanted to show that she hadn&#039;t picked it up that well yet, a subjective narration again can take on her voice, if you choose: &quot;Amethyst eyed the mare—Twilight… Sparkle—warily.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in disbelief//</span><br />Again, there are better ways of showing this that just stating it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she started slow//</span><br />slowly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra shot Amethyst a look//</span><br />This is incredibly vague.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;asked Amethyst almost completely monotone//</span><br />Odd phrasing. The syntax is off here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;perking up//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the way they came//</span><br />Tense issue again. &quot;Had come.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst could feel the back of her neck heating up, and wasn&#039;t sure if she was supposed to say anything.//</span><br />All one clause. No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked as though he as going to say something//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>us</i>?//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally italicize ! or ? when on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When both mares opened their mouths//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as though it was//</span><br />When making hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: as though it were.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Two more mares — unicorns, in fact — disembarked and both the chariot and the stallions pulling it disappeared back into the clouds.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mint-green one unicorn//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blue and pink-striped//</span><br />Hyphenate all that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the green unicorn asked//</span><br />We know their names. You&#039;re going a bit overboard on the LUS here. In case you don&#039;t know what that is, there&#039;s a section up top about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Carrot explained to the confused look on Amethyst&#039;s face//</span><br />She explained it to the look? That&#039;s a really odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;audible growl could be heard//</span><br />Is there another kind of growl? And if it&#039;s audible, isn&#039;t it redundant to say it &quot;could be heard&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;That&#039;s a shame,&quot; said Lyra. &quot;Sounds like you would have been more fun.&quot;//</span><br />Look how much of this conversation is structurally similar. Paragraph after paragraph goes &quot;Speech,&quot; she said. (&quot;Possibly more speech.&quot;) And those &quot;she said&quot; parts don&#039;t have the characters doing much more than speaking. Don&#039;t lose sight of the fact that they&#039;re actually doing things other than speaking. Half of a conversation is nonverbal anyway. There&#039;s a section on &quot;talking heads&quot; that will explain why ths is a bad thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;custom designed//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brightly covered ribbons//</span><br />&quot;Colored,&quot; yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now the streamers; pink or blue?//</span><br />Misused semicolon. This could be a colon, dash, or period, depending on what inflection you want.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All right, ladies; pick a stall.//</span><br />Another misused semicolon. This one should just be a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>girls</i> room</span><br />girls&#039;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, but— That&#039;s not what— What if— But that doesn&#039;t— What?//</span><br />You&#039;d either put a space on both sides of the dash or neither. And you don&#039;t really need to capitalize all those. There is a rationale for doing so, but honestly, it&#039;d be lost on the vast majority of readers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hustle-and-bustle//</span><br />You don&#039;t need those hyphens. It&#039;s a compound noun, not a modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlonian//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bon Bon trailed off.//</span><br />Yes. I can tell from the ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wait: are you about to tell me this thing cures the common cold?//</span><br />A colon is a really odd choice here. Why not just use a comma?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cutting him off//</span><br />Again, already evident from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A cheery, yet bored voice greeted them.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that comma, but if you want it there, you need to pair it with one at the end of the aside.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not the least bit amused//</span><br />Don&#039;t just tell me. Let me see it and judge for myself. Keep an eye out for places where your narrator bluntly tells me how a character feels. Is it an important moment in the story? Is it something you want the reader to identify with? Then show me. If it&#039;s a minor detail at a fleeting moment, then it&#039;s not so bad to tell.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that when Princess Celestia formed this company//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;citizen that//</span><br />A citizen is a &quot;who,&quot; not a &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the sister that//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one thousand-year-old//</span><br />Hyphenate all that, but it might sound more natural if you just dropped the &quot;one.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Flattering,&quot; Lyra sneered.//</span><br />That&#039;s a facial expression, not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two unicorns looked at one another before back to Carrot Top//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At the center of the mass was the unicorn renting out the space for the night, Twilight Sparkle, and the bouncing pink pony behind the party now taking place inside of it.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty convoluted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She certainly does like meeting new ponies, doesn&#039;t she,//</span><br />That&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fixated//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t mean the same thing as &quot;fixed.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I take it your Agent Doo?//</span><br />Your/you&#039;re confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The conversation was interrupted by the sound of a steam whistle nearby//</span><br />Then just have the whistle sound. Don&#039;t distance me from it by wedging a narrative comment in there. It undercuts the suddenness.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eying the party guests warily//</span><br />You have to be careful placing participles. They like to modify the nearest prior object. Really this describes the staircase, but it&#039;s easy to rule that out. But the most recent viable object is Lyra. It&#039;s unclear whether you actually mean her or Star.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;VIP&#039;s//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and being primarily an earth pony town at the time//</span><br />Comma to set off the absolute phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pegasi recruitment//</span><br />Noun adjuncts are singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just one?&quot; Amethyst looked up to see just one//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No; both//</span><br />You really use a lot of semicolons where they aren&#039;t warranted. And while your use of colons is mostly correct, you do it so often that they stand out as a writing tic. You don&#039;t want them drawing attention away from the story like that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This is an advantage; not a handicap.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before she could respond//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra&#039;s voice could be heard from the same direction//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the advantage of putting this in passive voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra gave Derpy a look//</span><br />That&#039;s incredibly vague. It could mean almost anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look, I&#039;m going to check in with HQ; stepping outside for a bit.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m sure once we&#039;re all back at HQ and have Bon Bon breathing down our necks //</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Many games were played well into the night, and most of the refreshments were downed by some pony or another.//</span><br />More inexplicable passive voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;I grew up in Canterlot, so, yes, of course,&quot; Amethyst laughed.//</span><br />This is why &quot;laugh&quot; often makes a poor speaking verb. It&#039;d be hard to laugh all that, especially with the pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;weeding out//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Both ponies laughed.//</span><br />This is the third laugh in less than half a screen, and the first of those three had nearly the identical phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not//</span><br />I normally don&#039;t force writers to avoid split infinitives, but this kind is so easy to fix. Just reverse these words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so between that and the big security threat we may have//</span><br />Coma for the dependent clause. It took me a while even to parse this sentence as is. A comma will really help keep it organized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;asked the white unicorn who decorated Town Hall//</span><br />It&#039;s in the story&#039;s past. Use past perfect tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When the tiny dragon circled the ground with his foot//</span><br />Same. And I don&#039;t know what &quot;circled the ground with his foot&quot; means. Is he twisting it? Scuffing it around? Walking a lap?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We can play again before you and Twilight go back to Canterlot; how does that sound?//</span><br />Another issue with all these colons and semicolons: It tends to make all these character voices run together. You want them to be more distinctive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The white unicorn looked to the pink party master, who also nodded.//</span><br />The LUS is really getting to me. In this case, Star already knows Pinkie&#039;s name. And why wouldn&#039;t their mission briefing have included Rarity and Spike?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she&#039;ll say upstairs in bed//</span><br />&quot;Stay,&quot; right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said the green unicorn//</span><br />And the LUS is especially rankling when Star, your focus character, definitely knows the names.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;birds&#039; songs//</span><br />&quot;Birdsong&quot; would work better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;addressing the crowd//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bon Bon&#039;s voice cut her off.//</span><br />That was already apparent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>What</i>?!&quot; Lyra hissed. &quot;And you picked <i>me</i>?!</span><br />When ! or ? is on an italicized word, you&#039;ll normally italicize it as well.<br /><br />I&#039;ll also note the wavering perspective in this scene. Take this line:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could see both Bon Bon and the subject of her sentence clearly.//</span><br />Only Carrot Top knows this, so she holds the perspective. Then just a few sentences later:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a look of pure childlike wonder was plastered across the pony&#039;s face//</span><br />I actually can&#039;t tell whether this refers to Star or Lyra, but this has switched to the perspective of whoever is observing the other here.<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst couldn&#039;t help but feel bad for her partner//</span><br />And now we&#039;re in Star&#039;s head. There are times a shifting perspective can work, but it&#039;s going to be especially confusing here where I already have a lot of characters to keep track of. It also keeps me from getting settled with any one character and identifying with her. Since Star is the new girl, and the story&#039;s as much about her learning the ropes as going over these security missions, you&#039;d probably do better by staying in her perspective, except where you want to get into scenes where she&#039;s not present.<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bon Bon turned to glare at Lyra, only to see that she was already a few paces back. She wasn&#039;t returning any looks; instead, Lyra looked far too thrilled about what was being said on stage.//</span><br />And now we&#039;re in Bon Bon&#039;s head.<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst watched the encounter from afar, and couldn&#039;t help but chuckle to herself.//</span><br />Very next sentence, and back to Star. That comma can go, by the way; this is all one clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;close Twilight was to all of them, but before she could ask if they were close//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when she looked back to Twilight//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the studious pony saw//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;THIS//</span><br />Italics are preferred over all caps.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Horns blared and a curtain was pulled at the front balcony//</span><br />Comma between the clauses, and why the passive voice?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the unicorn who pulled the curtain//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the citizens Ponyville//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sat, Oct 4th, 2014 09:56</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 282

>but given the pony didn't know the town very well//
Comma for the dependent clause. I'll continue pointing these out, since it can be a tough rule to have sink in, but there's a section at the top of this thread (comma use with conjunctions) that gives the basics. The point is to have you learn the rule on your own so that you'll get it right in any future chapters I don't see now.

>off-guard//

No hyphen

>The key is to be panicking at the front; helps you steer the mob//

There's an implied independent clause after the semicolon, but using it in the first place pretty much denotes a formalism that wouldn't skimp. A lot of the semicolons you use would do fine as dashes or just separate sentences. There are 27 in this chapter alone. That's a lot.

>Ponyville's PPP headquarters felt even more unnaturally quiet after the calamity the ponies present just witnessed.//

There's an opinion here, but I can't tell whose it is. And here, nearly a page later:
>the look from an otherwise amiable mare took the unicorn aback//
Is the first indication I have of who holds the perspective. That needs to be established early and often. Put more subjective phrases through the narration to color it through a particular character's perception, or remove any such things and keep it all omniscient.

>sifted//

Typo.

>BANG//

It's preferred to keep sound effects out of narration. Just describe the sound.

>sugar cube//

This is typically rendered as one word for a term of endearment.

>assured Lyra//

This is a transitive verb; it requires a direct object, but that object is the person being assured, not the speech that does so. That's why it makes a poor speaking verb.

>Everfree forest//

"Forest" would be capitalized as well. I can't remember if you've made this error before, so scan for it.

>Our two other objectives are countering Nightmare Moon, and finding Princess Celestia.//

No reason for that comma.

>cutting Bon Bon off//

Redundant with the punctuation.

>"Bon Bon, I don't have to take orders from you," Carrot snarled.//

At this point, I'll say that the command structure is very nebulous to me. I've been able to roll with it, but different characters defer to each other in different scenes. I don't see any clear delineation of who outranks whom, or what the chain of command is, except that Star is the low pony on the totem pole and Doctor is more of an auxiliary team member. It'd help if the orders consistently came from one pony and flowed down through regular channels.

>fine!//

>Lyra!//
Italicize the !.

>The two mares were making their way into the infamous Everfree forest; one pony on the ground and one in the sky.//

There are far more elegant ways of getting this across.

>See, I just don't see//

Repetition.

>make sense out of two separate inputs coming in at the same time//

It's actually not so hard. Many modern military displays take advantage of this, and a lot of animals make do with it as well.

>Lyra's sentence was cut off//

Again, unnecessary. If also undermines the suddenness when the narrator has a change to say this. Just have her stumble. The reader can put together that it caused her to get interrupted.

>By this point//

Phrases like this make the narration aware of itself, and they hurt immersion.

>Lyra groaned and her horn stopped glowing.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Fhew//

Phew.

>but before she could respond//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>This is not much of a problem for a pegasus, but her unicorn partner looked rather alarmed at the fact.//

This is worded as if perceived by an outside observer, which doesn't really mesh with the perspective you've been striking.

>sifting//

Typo, or a really odd word choice.

>either of us want//

"Either" takes the number of the options it describes, which are both singular here. "either of us wants"

>the doctor trailed off//

Yes, I can see that.

>to acknowledge or thank//

Those are both transitive verbs. They need direct objects.

>as a few jumps were introduced into his step//

Awkward phrasing.

>a certain someone is in here is specifically targeting some of us ponies//

Extraneous word.

>Don't breath a word//

breathe

>died?//

Italicize the ?.

>Each time she spoke, the seconds preceding showed her snarl getting worse.//

This is a really awkward phrasing. It's also not helping that you're inverting the timeline. You phrase it as getting me in the mind of when she speaks, then you add an "oh, by the way, this actually happens first." It'd work better like "each time, before she spoke, her snarl intensified" or some such, to follow the chronology.

>"Yeah, but did you?" Bon Bon shot back.//

Why is she taking up his cause so vehemently? She has no personal attachment to him, and even he doesn't seem too broken up about it. I'm also not getting any signals from her that this is striking a nerve with her emotionally. It's all in her dialogue, and at least there's some commensurate body language, but none of it gets at why she feels this way.

>Sometimes when you're chief handler//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>If Bon Bon had been bothered by her recent conversation, she refused to show it.//

But… you're in her perspective. The narrator should know whether it bothered her. Unless you're going to adopt an omniscient viewpoint for the scene at least or the story as a whole, the narrator effectively is Bon Bon.

>Back at Ponyville HQ, Carrot Top turned a knob on the console in front of her and a stern-looking stallion blipped onto one of the hanging monitors.//

Why the abrupt change of focus character and location? This would probably warrant a scene break.

>and a stern-looking stallion blipped onto one of the hanging monitors//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>"Carrot Top, Ponyville PPP,",//

Extraneous comma.

>with very little charm//

You're putting it all on me to invent how this looks and sounds. That's your job.

>two fold//

twofold

>cutting her off//

Besides being redundant, this is happening enough that it's starting to get repetitive.

>Even though Bon Bon couldn't see it, Carrot Top could see//

I get what you're trying to say, but this is repetitive and seemingly contradictory. Personally, I'd replace that second one with "picture" or "envision."

>The rest of the director's sentence was cut off prematurely.//

Just do a search for "off" and look for places where it's used with some form of "cut" or "trail." It's rarely necessary to narrate these.

>…Thank you//

There's an interesting dynamic between these two, but it's kind of hard to ferret out. They alternately hate and like each other, and it hints at a lot of history, which is a good thing, but particularly since you take on a subjective narration a lot, it might help to have a couple of fleeting thoughts about what that history is. Just a suggestion.

>Amethyst and Doctor Hooves were approaching decrepit ruins//

I assume this means that they took a different route than Twilight did, since they didn't encounter the spooky trees or Steven Magnet. Given that Twilight knew where she wanted to go and is pretty fastidious about such things, it might warrant some explanation. I wouldn't change it, though, because you've got a good thing going here. Too many "episode rehash" stories just repeated the same plot even by event, and I really like that you're keeping to the periphery of things here and only intersecting with the episode plot intermittently. As such, it really is a new story being told.

>and his eyes looked upward as though he was looking for something and the act of doing so was causing him a small bit of pain//

This is pretty vague and goes on far too long for its relative importance to the sentence.

>in admission//

This is an empty phrase.

>The bridge snapped. Right in front of Amethyst, with the doctor only a few steps from safety, the ends of the bridge closest to her snapped//

Repetition. This could work, but you have to make it obvious that the repetition is intentional by repeating it even more or having the narrator call attention to it, like using "actually snapped" the second time.

>curious as to just how much time the body they were attached to had left//

I don't see the need or advantage to go into his perspective here.

>The doctor's front hooves still took a few grabs at nothing while the stallion slowly rose upwards. In mere moments he was settled safely at his pink friend's side.//

And I get no reasonable reaction from him about this. He thought he was about to plummet to his death, and he can't manage any more than mild curiosity?

>admitted//

You use this an awful lot.

>Canterlot orchestra//

If that's the proper name, it would all be capitalized, and if not, she'd be familiar enough with it to use the real one.

>Lyra reminded//

Transitive verb needs a direct object.

>'Good job, sport, you're really getting the hang of this'.//

Period inside the quotes.

>and before I can stop her//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Several trees and rocks were hurdled before Lyra spoke again.//

There's no reason for passive voice here. For one, it brings the action to a halt, and for another, it shifts focus from the characters to the rocks, and they're not important.

>but considering Lyra wasn't looking//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>"Wow. Doo. Phrasing."//

But… she said it first. Why would she pick on Derpy for repeating it? I get that you might be trying to make an Archer joke here, but pop culture references aren't the best idea, except maybe when they directly tie in with a crossover.

Your perspective in this scene is vague. This appears to be in Lyra's, since it speaks to what she can hear, even though Derpy or an omniscient narrator would know exactly what the sound was:
>After a slapping sound she looked behind her to see that Derpy had covered her mouth with her front hooves, and both eyes were staring at her widely.//
Yet this is in Derpy's perspective, since Lyra's turned around and wouldn't be able to see it:
>Derpy shook her head and continued flying behind the green unicorn, one eye on her back and the other on a party of six ponies giggling in a nearby clearing.//

>and when she did//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>That I don't care. Fact is, I do, and a lot more than I care to admit//

Repetition.

>Bon Bon observed confused.//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>crystalline//

I'm baffled by this word choice. It parses as an adverb, but the sentence structure suggests a noun. I would have expected "crystals" here, so I'm not sure what you were going for.

>removed the saddlebag from his back and began removing//

Repetition.

>Nightmare Moon has not yet arrived here, or surely she would have taken them and left to search for the sixth//

Okay, at the risk of this comment becoming obsolete, pending how the rest of this chapter plays out, how do you explain 1) that Luna and thus Nightmare Moon would know the crystals meant nothing and 2) that it was necessary to return the crystals to the tree at the beginning of season 5?

>not from anger, nor from pity; she wasn't sure why her body was carrying out the motion.//

Then what am I supposed to get from it?

>he added as an afterthought.//

You might want to separate his speech. This implies that the entire quoted passage was an afterthough, not just the last sentence.

>Hooves pointed to a circular funnel-like panel and Amethyst nodded.//

Comma between the clauses.

>She stamped the ground and lighting cracked in its wake.//

Comma between the clauses.

>take no pleasure in taking//

Repetitive.

>After a short puff from her nose, Nightmare Moon's ear//

There's a disconnect here. The introductory phrase describes Nightmare Moon, but then the rest of the sentence sounds like it was her ear that puffed from her nose.

Okay, there are obviously some problems here, but I really like this story and hope to see it return in good shape so I can post it to the blog. The main issues to me are the inconsistent perspective and the way the abundance of semicolons both calls attention to itself as a writing tick and serves to unify all the character perspectives instead of letting them feel distinctive and unique. It gets a little telly at inopportune times, the narration of cutting off or trailing off is wholly unnecessary, and the formatting of the comm traffic is awful. Try to cut back on the "to be" verbs as well.

There were other things, too, but they should be evident. Basically, if I had to bring up a point multiple times, it's something that needs attention.<span class="unkfunc">&gt;but given the pony didn&#039;t know the town very well//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause. I&#039;ll continue pointing these out, since it can be a tough rule to have sink in, but there&#039;s a section at the top of this thread (comma use with conjunctions) that gives the basics. The point is to have you learn the rule on your own so that you&#039;ll get it right in any future chapters I don&#039;t see now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;off-guard//</span><br />No hyphen<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The key is to be panicking at the front; helps you steer the mob//</span><br />There&#039;s an implied independent clause after the semicolon, but using it in the first place pretty much denotes a formalism that wouldn&#039;t skimp. A lot of the semicolons you use would do fine as dashes or just separate sentences. There are 27 in this chapter alone. That&#039;s a lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville&#039;s PPP headquarters felt even more unnaturally quiet after the calamity the ponies present just witnessed.//</span><br />There&#039;s an opinion here, but I can&#039;t tell whose it is. And here, nearly a page later:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the look from an otherwise amiable mare took the unicorn aback//</span><br />Is the first indication I have of who holds the perspective. That needs to be established early and often. Put more subjective phrases through the narration to color it through a particular character&#039;s perception, or remove any such things and keep it all omniscient.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sifted//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;BANG//</span><br />It&#039;s preferred to keep sound effects out of narration. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sugar cube//</span><br />This is typically rendered as one word for a term of endearment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;assured Lyra//</span><br />This is a transitive verb; it requires a direct object, but that object is the person being assured, not the speech that does so. That&#039;s why it makes a poor speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everfree forest//</span><br />&quot;Forest&quot; would be capitalized as well. I can&#039;t remember if you&#039;ve made this error before, so scan for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Our two other objectives are countering Nightmare Moon, and finding Princess Celestia.//</span><br />No reason for that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cutting Bon Bon off//</span><br />Redundant with the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Bon Bon, I don&#039;t have to take orders from you,&quot; Carrot snarled.//</span><br />At this point, I&#039;ll say that the command structure is very nebulous to me. I&#039;ve been able to roll with it, but different characters defer to each other in different scenes. I don&#039;t see any clear delineation of who outranks whom, or what the chain of command is, except that Star is the low pony on the totem pole and Doctor is more of an auxiliary team member. It&#039;d help if the orders consistently came from one pony and flowed down through regular channels.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>fine</i>!//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Lyra</i>!//</span><br />Italicize the !.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two mares were making their way into the infamous Everfree forest; one pony on the ground and one in the sky.//</span><br />There are far more elegant ways of getting this across.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;See, I just don&#039;t see//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;make sense out of two separate inputs coming in at the same time//</span><br />It&#039;s actually not so hard. Many modern military displays take advantage of this, and a lot of animals make do with it as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra&#039;s sentence was cut off//</span><br />Again, unnecessary. If also undermines the suddenness when the narrator has a change to say this. Just have her stumble. The reader can put together that it caused her to get interrupted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;By this point//</span><br />Phrases like this make the narration aware of itself, and they hurt immersion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra groaned and her horn stopped glowing.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fhew//</span><br />Phew.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before she could respond//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This is not much of a problem for a pegasus, but her unicorn partner looked rather alarmed at the fact.//</span><br />This is worded as if perceived by an outside observer, which doesn&#039;t really mesh with the perspective you&#039;ve been striking.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sifting//</span><br />Typo, or a really odd word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;either of us want//</span><br />&quot;Either&quot; takes the number of the options it describes, which are both singular here. &quot;either of us wants&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the doctor trailed off//</span><br />Yes, I can see that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to acknowledge or thank//</span><br />Those are both transitive verbs. They need direct objects.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as a few jumps were introduced into his step//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a certain someone is in here is specifically targeting some of us ponies//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don&#039;t breath a word//</span><br />breathe<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>died</i>?//</span><br />Italicize the ?.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Each time she spoke, the seconds preceding showed her snarl getting worse.//</span><br />This is a really awkward phrasing. It&#039;s also not helping that you&#039;re inverting the timeline. You phrase it as getting me in the mind of when she speaks, then you add an &quot;oh, by the way, this actually happens first.&quot; It&#039;d work better like &quot;each time, before she spoke, her snarl intensified&quot; or some such, to follow the chronology.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Yeah, but did you?&quot; Bon Bon shot back.//</span><br />Why is she taking up his cause so vehemently? She has no personal attachment to him, and even he doesn&#039;t seem too broken up about it. I&#039;m also not getting any signals from her that this is striking a nerve with her emotionally. It&#039;s all in her dialogue, and at least there&#039;s some commensurate body language, but none of it gets at <i>why</i> she feels this way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sometimes when you&#039;re chief handler//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If Bon Bon had been bothered by her recent conversation, she refused to show it.//</span><br />But… you&#039;re in her perspective. The narrator should know whether it bothered her. Unless you&#039;re going to adopt an omniscient viewpoint for the scene at least or the story as a whole, the narrator effectively <i>is</i> Bon Bon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Back at Ponyville HQ, Carrot Top turned a knob on the console in front of her and a stern-looking stallion blipped onto one of the hanging monitors.//</span><br />Why the abrupt change of focus character and location? This would probably warrant a scene break.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and a stern-looking stallion blipped onto one of the hanging monitors//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Carrot Top, Ponyville PPP,&quot;,//</span><br />Extraneous comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with very little charm//</span><br />You&#039;re putting it all on me to invent how this looks and sounds. That&#039;s your job.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two fold//</span><br />twofold<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cutting her off//</span><br />Besides being redundant, this is happening enough that it&#039;s starting to get repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even though Bon Bon couldn&#039;t see it, Carrot Top could see//</span><br />I get what you&#039;re trying to say, but this is repetitive and seemingly contradictory. Personally, I&#039;d replace that second one with &quot;picture&quot; or &quot;envision.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The rest of the director&#039;s sentence was cut off prematurely.//</span><br />Just do a search for &quot;off&quot; and look for places where it&#039;s used with some form of &quot;cut&quot; or &quot;trail.&quot; It&#039;s rarely necessary to narrate these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…Thank you//</span><br />There&#039;s an interesting dynamic between these two, but it&#039;s kind of hard to ferret out. They alternately hate and like each other, and it hints at a lot of history, which is a good thing, but particularly since you take on a subjective narration a lot, it might help to have a couple of fleeting thoughts about what that history is. Just a suggestion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst and Doctor Hooves were approaching decrepit ruins//</span><br />I assume this means that they took a different route than Twilight did, since they didn&#039;t encounter the spooky trees or Steven Magnet. Given that Twilight knew where she wanted to go and is pretty fastidious about such things, it might warrant some explanation. I wouldn&#039;t change it, though, because you&#039;ve got a good thing going here. Too many &quot;episode rehash&quot; stories just repeated the same plot even by event, and I really like that you&#039;re keeping to the periphery of things here and only intersecting with the episode plot intermittently. As such, it really is a new story being told.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and his eyes looked upward as though he was looking for something and the act of doing so was causing him a small bit of pain//</span><br />This is pretty vague and goes on far too long for its relative importance to the sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in admission//</span><br />This is an empty phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The bridge snapped. Right in front of Amethyst, with the doctor only a few steps from safety, the ends of the bridge closest to her snapped//</span><br />Repetition. This could work, but you have to make it obvious that the repetition is intentional by repeating it even more or having the narrator call attention to it, like using &quot;actually snapped&quot; the second time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;curious as to just how much time the body they were attached to had left//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the need or advantage to go into his perspective here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The doctor&#039;s front hooves still took a few grabs at nothing while the stallion slowly rose upwards. In mere moments he was settled safely at his pink friend&#039;s side.//</span><br />And I get no reasonable reaction from him about this. He thought he was about to plummet to his death, and he can&#039;t manage any more than mild curiosity?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;admitted//</span><br />You use this an awful lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlot orchestra//</span><br />If that&#039;s the proper name, it would all be capitalized, and if not, she&#039;d be familiar enough with it to use the real one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra reminded//</span><br />Transitive verb needs a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;Good job, sport, you&#039;re really getting the hang of this&#039;.//</span><br />Period inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and before I can stop her//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Several trees and rocks were hurdled before Lyra spoke again.//</span><br />There&#039;s no reason for passive voice here. For one, it brings the action to a halt, and for another, it shifts focus from the characters to the rocks, and they&#039;re not important.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but considering Lyra wasn&#039;t looking//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Wow. Doo. Phrasing.&quot;//</span><br />But… she said it first. Why would she pick on Derpy for repeating it? I get that you might be trying to make an Archer joke here, but pop culture references aren&#039;t the best idea, except maybe when they directly tie in with a crossover.<br /><br />Your perspective in this scene is vague. This appears to be in Lyra&#039;s, since it speaks to what she can hear, even though Derpy or an omniscient narrator would know exactly what the sound was:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After a slapping sound she looked behind her to see that Derpy had covered her mouth with her front hooves, and both eyes were staring at her widely.//</span><br />Yet this is in Derpy&#039;s perspective, since Lyra&#039;s turned around and wouldn&#039;t be able to see it:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Derpy shook her head and continued flying behind the green unicorn, one eye on her back and the other on a party of six ponies giggling in a nearby clearing.//</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and when she did//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That I don&#039;t care. Fact is, I do, and a lot more than I care to admit//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bon Bon observed confused.//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crystalline//</span><br />I&#039;m baffled by this word choice. It parses as an adverb, but the sentence structure suggests a noun. I would have expected &quot;crystals&quot; here, so I&#039;m not sure what you were going for.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;removed the saddlebag from his back and began removing//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nightmare Moon has not yet arrived here, or surely she would have taken them and left to search for the sixth//</span><br />Okay, at the risk of this comment becoming obsolete, pending how the rest of this chapter plays out, how do you explain 1) that Luna and thus Nightmare Moon would know the crystals meant nothing and 2) that it was necessary to return the crystals to the tree at the beginning of season 5?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not from anger, nor from pity; she wasn&#039;t sure why her body was carrying out the motion.//</span><br />Then what am I supposed to get from it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he added as an afterthought.//</span><br />You might want to separate his speech. This implies that the entire quoted passage was an afterthough, not just the last sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hooves pointed to a circular funnel-like panel and Amethyst nodded.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stamped the ground and lighting cracked in its wake.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;take no pleasure in taking//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After a short puff from her nose, Nightmare Moon&#039;s ear//</span><br />There&#039;s a disconnect here. The introductory phrase describes Nightmare Moon, but then the rest of the sentence sounds like it was her ear that puffed from her nose.<br /><br />Okay, there are obviously some problems here, but I really like this story and hope to see it return in good shape so I can post it to the blog. The main issues to me are the inconsistent perspective and the way the abundance of semicolons both calls attention to itself as a writing tick and serves to unify all the character perspectives instead of letting them feel distinctive and unique. It gets a little telly at inopportune times, the narration of cutting off or trailing off is wholly unnecessary, and the formatting of the comm traffic is awful. Try to cut back on the &quot;to be&quot; verbs as well.<br /><br />There were other things, too, but they should be evident. Basically, if I had to bring up a point multiple times, it&#039;s something that needs attention.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 283

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Even if the groaning wood didn’t wake her up//

>The first time she saw him knock an apple out of a tree//
Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>Sorry Pa.//

>You mean it Pa?//
Comma for direct address.

>Why don’t you come on over here and I’ll show you.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Just take a look at this tree, tell me how many apples there are.//

Splice.

>stetson//

It's a proper noun.

>for…” Her face lit up “… are//

Either you're missing punctuation or you were trying to do a narrative aside. If the latter, here's how to do it:
for—” her face lit up “—are
if the speech stops for the action or:
for”—her face lit up—“are
if it doesn't.

>back at forth//

Typo.

>backing//

You generally want to avoid using all but the most mundane words multiple times so close together, and this doesn't come long after that "back and forth."

>lots ‘a//

Either lotsa or lots o'.

>This so great, I never have anyone to go with to these meetings.//

Splice. I'll alos say that this conversation is right on the verge of getting talking heads. There are a lot of quotes, but there's not much character action in between them to give me the nonverbal part of the conversation.

>I’m so glad they’re doing it in Ponyville, it’s brought in members from all over.//

Splice.

>obvious unease//

How so? Don't draw that conclusion for me. Let me see what Applejack does and make that judgment for myself.

>I suppose that’s why I entered the contest this year, it’s just…//

Splice.

>Good afternoon everypony//

Comma for direct address.

>The first row was completely packed and the second wasn’t far behind.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Once they found a pair of seats Applejack pulled her hat over her eyes and Twilight resumed her giddy pony-watching.//

Two commas needed here to separate clauses. Rather than give you page after page of comma issues, suffice it to say you need some editing help with those.

>against I//

me

>with a pony as yourself//

Seems like you're missing a word or two in there.

>two hundred and sixty seven//

Sixty-seven is hyphenated. I can get that maybe AJ hasn't been indoctrinated yet, but in scientific and mathematical circles, it's considered improper to use an "and" in numbers, except for improper fractions.

>forth//

forth/fourth confusion

>Applejack’s gentle giant of a Pa had been replaced with a monster; fiercer than a timberwolf and twice as big.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it.

>all of the sudden//

The phrase is "all of a sudden."

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. There are several ways to force it in the right direction—use the alt-code, type two and erase the first, or paste one in.

>burn off a some steam//

Extraneous word.

>He coughed twice//

I'm going to make a pre-emptive strike here and say I really, really hope this isn't what results in his death, either this injury or some latter attack by the Carrots. That'd be needlessly maudlin, and it's more than a little ridiculous to have Applejack loving math but keeping it close to her chest because it got her dad killed.

>one hundred and forty-fourth annual//

Yeah, someone who's a math professor isn't going to put the "and" in there.

>is…” a hush fell over the audience “Maud Pie//

See previous comment about punctuating this as a narrative aside or making it separate sentences.

>a grey Earth Pony, clad in a simple blue dress//

Why are you describing her? The reader will certainly know what she looks like, and the characters who have held perspective so far already know her. So for whose benefit is this?

>she stared out at crowd//

Missing word.

>a link between elliptic curves and modular forms//

Okay, I have a math degree, and this means nothing to me, though it's admittedly been a long time. If this is just something made up to sound technical, I don't really care either way. But if this is for real, then… I guess I don't care, either, but that meaning will be lost on the vast majority of readers.

>now damp//

Hyphenate.

>and some fool part of me I thought he could give it to him//

Some jumbled wording in there.

>two thousand year old//

Hyphenate all that.

>“That’s some high praise for a farmer like me. I don’t have any degree, unless you count bucking apples.”//

So she was in tears a moment ago, now she gets some unexpectedly good news, and… I get precisely zero reaction from her at all? Just a couple of bland sentences of dialogue? This is an emotional high point of the story, and you have to sell it as such. How would this make her feel? Then translate that into how it would make her look and act. That said, it may take a little more to get at what is exactly revolutionary about this. By her dad's own description, it was just taking enough of a dataset to cover variations in all the relevant parameters. While it may be a subject nobody had applied it to before, it certainly was never described as a method different from what any other statistical model might employ. It seemed more that her dad was collecting data nobody had collected before, not developed an analytical technique that was new.

>I’d like to try your distribution against my work in rock farming.//

Okay… this might take some explanation as to how it would even be applicable to rock farming.

That's a pretty weak ending. All this stuff has just come to a head, and then it's vague as to what it all means. Open-endedness is fine, but you at least have to attach some emotional weight to what the alternative futures might be. Your various plotlines ask the following questions for me: What might Applejack want to work on in the future? Will she go to school for it? If so, what becomes of the farm, and if not, what will she do to apply what knowledge she does have in another way or try to teach herself more math? Will she be more open about her involvement, maybe join the local math club?

You don't have to answer all these, but you should set up that she's thinking through the options. Along those lines, it might be easier to cast this chapter in Applejack's viewpoint instead of Twilight's. This is a very personal moment for her, so I agree with the choice to cast it in a limited narration, and yet these big moments pass for her with precious little emotional cuing. The way I feel most cheated is in her friendship wih Twilight. She's really reached out here, an Applejack might either wholeheartedly embrace public acknowledgement of her talents, ask Twilight to let her take it slowly, or tell her thanks but no thanks. They all would have their emotional baggage, and even if she doesn't come to a conclusion, the thought process of considering her options would do a lot more to connect me to her. She doesn't really seem to come to much closure regarding her father, either. Aside from the consistent issues with commas the only other big problem here is the lack of emotional depth and lack of direction at the end, again not so much that a path isn't clearly defined, but that she doesn't even appear mindful of the situation. It's just kind of a pat, noncommittal closing.

I do like the idea of Applejack with this hidden talent, and the writing did have a nice flow to it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even if the groaning wood didn’t wake her up//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The first time she saw him knock an apple out of a tree//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sorry Pa.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You mean it Pa?//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why don’t you come on over here and I’ll show you.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just take a look at this tree, tell me how many apples there are.//</span><br />Splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stetson//</span><br />It&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for…” Her face lit up “… are//</span><br />Either you&#039;re missing punctuation or you were trying to do a narrative aside. If the latter, here&#039;s how to do it:<br />for—” her face lit up “—are<br />if the speech stops for the action or:<br />for”—her face lit up—“are<br />if it doesn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back at forth//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;backing//</span><br />You generally want to avoid using all but the most mundane words multiple times so close together, and this doesn&#039;t come long after that &quot;back and forth.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lots ‘a//</span><br />Either lotsa or lots o&#039;.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This so great, I never have anyone to go with to these meetings.//</span><br />Splice. I&#039;ll alos say that this conversation is right on the verge of getting talking heads. There are a lot of quotes, but there&#039;s not much character action in between them to give me the nonverbal part of the conversation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m so glad they’re doing it in Ponyville, it’s brought in members from all over.//</span><br />Splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;obvious unease//</span><br />How so? Don&#039;t draw that conclusion for me. Let me see what Applejack does and make that judgment for myself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I suppose that’s why I entered the contest this year, it’s just…//</span><br />Splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Good afternoon everypony//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The first row was completely packed and the second wasn’t far behind.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once they found a pair of seats Applejack pulled her hat over her eyes and Twilight resumed her giddy pony-watching.//</span><br />Two commas needed here to separate clauses. Rather than give you page after page of comma issues, suffice it to say you need some editing help with those.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;against I//</span><br />me<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a pony as yourself//</span><br />Seems like you&#039;re missing a word or two in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two hundred and sixty seven//</span><br />Sixty-seven is hyphenated. I can get that maybe AJ hasn&#039;t been indoctrinated yet, but in scientific and mathematical circles, it&#039;s considered improper to use an &quot;and&quot; in numbers, except for improper fractions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;forth//</span><br />forth/fourth confusion<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack’s gentle giant of a Pa had been replaced with a monster; fiercer than a timberwolf and twice as big.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all of the sudden//</span><br />The phrase is &quot;all of a sudden.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. There are several ways to force it in the right direction—use the alt-code, type two and erase the first, or paste one in.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;burn off a some steam//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He coughed twice//</span><br />I&#039;m going to make a pre-emptive strike here and say I really, really hope this isn&#039;t what results in his death, either this injury or some latter attack by the Carrots. That&#039;d be needlessly maudlin, and it&#039;s more than a little ridiculous to have Applejack loving math but keeping it close to her chest because it got her dad killed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one hundred and forty-fourth annual//</span><br />Yeah, someone who&#039;s a math professor isn&#039;t going to put the &quot;and&quot; in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;is…” a hush fell over the audience “Maud Pie//</span><br />See previous comment about punctuating this as a narrative aside or making it separate sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a grey Earth Pony, clad in a simple blue dress//</span><br />Why are you describing her? The reader will certainly know what she looks like, and the characters who have held perspective so far already know her. So for whose benefit is this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she stared out at crowd//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a link between elliptic curves and modular forms//</span><br />Okay, I have a math degree, and this means nothing to me, though it&#039;s admittedly been a long time. If this is just something made up to sound technical, I don&#039;t really care either way. But if this is for real, then… I guess I don&#039;t care, either, but that meaning will be lost on the vast majority of readers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now damp//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and some fool part of me I thought he could give it to him//</span><br />Some jumbled wording in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two thousand year old//</span><br />Hyphenate all that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That’s some high praise for a farmer like me. I don’t have any degree, unless you count bucking apples.”//</span><br />So she was in tears a moment ago, now she gets some unexpectedly good news, and… I get precisely zero reaction from her at all? Just a couple of bland sentences of dialogue? This is an emotional high point of the story, and you have to sell it as such. How would this make her feel? Then translate that into how it would make her look and act. That said, it may take a little more to get at what is exactly revolutionary about this. By her dad&#039;s own description, it was just taking enough of a dataset to cover variations in all the relevant parameters. While it may be a subject nobody had applied it to before, it certainly was never described as a method different from what any other statistical model might employ. It seemed more that her dad was collecting data nobody had collected before, not developed an analytical technique that was new.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’d like to try your distribution against my work in rock farming.//</span><br />Okay… this might take some explanation as to how it would even be applicable to rock farming.<br /><br />That&#039;s a pretty weak ending. All this stuff has just come to a head, and then it&#039;s vague as to what it all means. Open-endedness is fine, but you at least have to attach some emotional weight to what the alternative futures might be. Your various plotlines ask the following questions for me: What might Applejack want to work on in the future? Will she go to school for it? If so, what becomes of the farm, and if not, what will she do to apply what knowledge she does have in another way or try to teach herself more math? Will she be more open about her involvement, maybe join the local math club?<br /><br />You don&#039;t have to answer all these, but you should set up that she&#039;s thinking through the options. Along those lines, it might be easier to cast this chapter in Applejack&#039;s viewpoint instead of Twilight&#039;s. This is a very personal moment for her, so I agree with the choice to cast it in a limited narration, and yet these big moments pass for her with precious little emotional cuing. The way I feel most cheated is in her friendship wih Twilight. She&#039;s really reached out here, an Applejack might either wholeheartedly embrace public acknowledgement of her talents, ask Twilight to let her take it slowly, or tell her thanks but no thanks. They all would have their emotional baggage, and even if she doesn&#039;t come to a conclusion, the thought process of considering her options would do a lot more to connect me to her. She doesn&#039;t really seem to come to much closure regarding her father, either. Aside from the consistent issues with commas the only other big problem here is the lack of emotional depth and lack of direction at the end, again not so much that a path isn&#039;t clearly defined, but that she doesn&#039;t even appear mindful of the situation. It&#039;s just kind of a pat, noncommittal closing.<br /><br />I do like the idea of Applejack with this hidden talent, and the writing did have a nice flow to it.<br />

Feedback Response Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 284

>>131059
>>131060
Hi there,

As the writer of the story reviewed in the two posts listed, there are a few things I would like to say/ask about.

First off, I want to thank you for providing such an in-depth look at the weak points in my story. I know that's not exactly in your job description, so going the extra mile for me here is much appreciated. I truly can't put into words what it means to me.

With that said, I would like to respond to a few of your notes. Many of the simple changes you've suggested I've already made, and am rather embarrassed that they somehow slipped under the radar during my own reviews of each chapter.

Your very first note likewise concerns the very first line of the story:
><Do it, Star.>//
I can understand where the annotation here could be jarring, yet I've seen it used once or twice before in novels to convey something similar, namely communicating when not directly in person. Using regular quotes with the possibility of italics just doesn't care the same effect, in my personal opinion. However, I recognize that you're a greater authority on the matter here, so if this is something that you're adamant about I can look into it in later revisions.

You mention a large number of "to be" verbs, and I recognize where I could be better about that. That said, are they still unwelcome when in the past perfect progressive form? If so, is there a better way of getting that sort of message across?

LUS:
I've heard of this before, and am constantly afraid of falling into it. However, I also don't like repetition, and you made a few notes on such instances yourself. Is it okay to just say "Twilight said", "Twilight walked", "Twilight hated", etc. without any real variation in there? I really, truly want an honest opinion here on when it might be okay to not simply use a character's name all the time. Additionally, in the second chapter when the rest of the characters first meet, the perspective is supposed to be on the Ponyville party, meaning that not using the newcomers' names until they're said is something I intended. Later on I use it when referring to Twilight and her friends even after learning some of their names, and my intent there is to show a lack of familiarity between whose perspective we're in and the pony in question. I'll get more into your perspective notes in a bit.

"Talking heads" is something I can be bad about, at least in a first draft. I add more color as I go, but sometimes I feel like narrating too much of what's going on and who's doing what while they speak breaks the flow in the conversation. Any tips in that regard?

>Yeah, but— That's not what— What if— But that doesn't— What?//

This was a moment in which I wasn't sure what to do with the dash, I admit. It's my understanding that it should be attached to a word if that's where a sentence ends abruptly, and with a space if it's more like a side not. What I'm trying to convey here is a constant shifting from one question to the next without the mouth having enough time to convey they whole question, which is also why each word is capitalized after the dash: it's the start of a new question. You suggested either adding a space at the front of each dash or removing the one after, and lowercasing the following words: is what's best for what I'm trying to convey here?

>Canterlonian//

Is there a term for a citizen of Canterlot other than this? I more or less made it up, I think, and I'm not sure what you mean by there being a typo here.

>The two unicorns looked at one another before back to Carrot Top//

Similarly, I'm not sure what the missing word here is; I read the sentence out loud as slow as I could, and it still felt fine to me. I could be wrong though.

>The conversation was interrupted by the sound of a steam whistle nearby//

On this note you said, "Then just have the whistle sound," but later on at the word "BANG", you say, "It's preferred to keep sound effects out of narration." I'm a little confused; how would you describe these two scenarios?

I have a problem with semicolons. I recognize that. And I'm glad you pointed this out to me, or I may have gone on thinking that it was fine to use as many as I had. That said, at moments like "This is an advantage; not a handicap", what I'm trying to convey is that there is a sort of pause there: one that's too hard for a colon, but a period would make the part after not even a real sentence, and a dash just doesn't sit right with me. You can let me know if I just need to buck up and deal with something though. Thoughts?

Perspective is something I'm aware of but woefully went unchecked in this story. I can't say for sure why it fell to the wayside, but I'll be paying closer attention in future edits. Some of your notes come from constant shifts, particularly at the Summer Sun Celebration. Five of the main characters are here, each with their own view on what's occurring around them; would this scene be better suited to just all be from one perspective? I feel like it would lose something, especially since not all of the characters are right next to one another. Is there an elegant way to jump from one head to the next to get a collective understanding of what's happening in a scene? Is that even possible?

Twice I use the word "sifted", and twice you noted it as being either wrong or out-of-place. I'm trying to describe the way NMM's mist would move along the ground, or the way it kinds quickly seeps out of a surface (the word "seeps" obviously sounding a little… thick for what mist should be). Is there a better term I can use here?

You mentioned being confused at the command structure in the organization, which one pre-reader has also mentioned to me. I have to say I'm confused at this, as I though I spelled it out pretty clearly when Star and Lyra first arrived in Ponyville. Did things get better as the story went on at least?

>make sense out of two separate inputs coming in at the same time//

This is more about Lyra not wanting to believe Derpy is better than her in some regard rather than an actual statement on human (pony) capability.

You have some comments on Bon Bon and Carrot Top, and their attitudes towards one another and in general. These comments were made before they had a little heart-to-heart, so I'm curious to know if these notes were made after reading that passage, or if it cleared things up at all. If not, I'm willing to go into more detail on what I'm trying to get across with their words to one another, and hopefully find a better way to convey it.

>Amethyst and Doctor Hooves were approaching decrepit ruins//

I admit that I didn't really think too much about the fact that they would have taken a different path from Twilight. In my head I assume that Doctor Hooves knows a quicker path, since he's more familiar with the forest and Twilight only just arrived, but in hindsight I never explicitly say that. I'm trying to think of a good place where it could naturally come up, and wouldn't mind some input on the matter. Otherwise I'd hate to just wedge the bit of fact in there.

>He thought he was about to plummet to his death, and he can't manage any more than mild curiosity?

It's part of my characterization for Doctor Hooves. Essentially, nothing really gets him down unless something about his brother comes up. The idea here is that anything, even a near-death experience, anything that can get his mind off of his brother's passing is a reason for him to be happy. He's not quite right in the head and doesn't always react normally, and I think by now you may have seen that a bit. Is it simply not working here?

>"Wow. Doo. Phrasing."//

First off, it is a bit of an Archer reference, mostly due to the fact that a binge-watching of the show on a sick day led to this story getting written. The more I think on it though, the more it does feel out of place; I know that making references can take a reader outside of the experience, but somehow that bit of what the story was initially going to be stubbornly stayed around. The other part of having it there though is to highlight Lyra's mentality: she's not quite right either, as displayed by some of what she says to Derpy earlier in the section. In some moments she's serious and bossy, but others she's making inappropriate jokes. Once again, you can let me know if that's not coming across the best here.

>Nightmare Moon has not yet arrived here, or surely she would have taken them and left to search for the sixth//

>Okay, at the risk of this comment becoming obsolete, pending how the rest of this chapter plays out, how do you explain 1) that Luna and thus Nightmare Moon would know the crystals meant nothing and 2) that it was necessary to return the crystals to the tree at the beginning of season 5?
1) Luna/NMM believes the crystals are what the story says they are; was that not caught when Hooves is explaining the story at the start of the section?
2) This story is only meant to take place during the events of the season premiere. I've mulled over ideas for later episodes in the series as sequels to this story, but haven't solidified anything yet. In the end, regardless of what does and doesn't get written, it has an Alternate Universe tag for a reason.

To recap, I know that some of my biggest problems are maintaining perspective, an overuse of semicolons, and a need to be a bit more showy than telly (my last story was accused of being "purple"; I think that's left me hesitant to go into too much detail ever since). I plan on revising some of these earlier chapters alongside upcoming ones, where hopefully I can recognize some of these issues before their posting. I really do need to inquire further opinion on the comm formatting, as completely removing it from the story would prove to be a small hassle, and I feel like the story would lose that sense of knowing whether or not a conversation is happening face to face.

Again, I know this is above and beyond what you're meant to do as an EQD pre-reader, so I do highly appreciate your honest and plentiful feedback here. I know it's not your place to respond to all of the inquiries I have listed here either, so any kind of response would be similarly appreciated. Thank you so much!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131059" onclick="return highlight('131059', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131059">&gt;&gt;131059</a><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131060" onclick="return highlight('131060', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131060">&gt;&gt;131060</a><br />Hi there,<br /><br />As the writer of the story reviewed in the two posts listed, there are a few things I would like to say/ask about.<br /><br />First off, I want to thank you for providing such an in-depth look at the weak points in my story. I know that&#039;s not exactly in your job description, so going the extra mile for me here is much appreciated. I truly can&#039;t put into words what it means to me.<br /><br />With that said, I would like to respond to a few of your notes. Many of the simple changes you&#039;ve suggested I&#039;ve already made, and am rather embarrassed that they somehow slipped under the radar during my own reviews of each chapter.<br /><br />Your very first note likewise concerns the very first line of the story: <br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&lt;Do it, Star.&gt;//</span><br />I can understand where the annotation here could be jarring, yet I&#039;ve seen it used once or twice before in novels to convey something similar, namely communicating when not directly in person. Using regular quotes with the possibility of italics just doesn&#039;t care the same effect, in my personal opinion. However, I recognize that you&#039;re a greater authority on the matter here, so if this is something that you&#039;re adamant about I can look into it in later revisions.<br /><br />You mention a large number of &quot;to be&quot; verbs, and I recognize where I could be better about that. That said, are they still unwelcome when in the past perfect progressive form? If so, is there a better way of getting that sort of message across?<br /><br />LUS:<br />I&#039;ve heard of this before, and am constantly afraid of falling into it. However, I also don&#039;t like repetition, and you made a few notes on such instances yourself. Is it okay to just say &quot;Twilight said&quot;, &quot;Twilight walked&quot;, &quot;Twilight hated&quot;, etc. without any real variation in there? I really, truly want an honest opinion here on when it might be okay to not simply use a character&#039;s name all the time. Additionally, in the second chapter when the rest of the characters first meet, the perspective is supposed to be on the Ponyville party, meaning that not using the newcomers&#039; names until they&#039;re said is something I intended. Later on I use it when referring to Twilight and her friends even after learning some of their names, and my intent there is to show a lack of familiarity between whose perspective we&#039;re in and the pony in question. I&#039;ll get more into your perspective notes in a bit.<br /><br />&quot;Talking heads&quot; is something I can be bad about, at least in a first draft. I add more color as I go, but sometimes I feel like narrating too much of what&#039;s going on and who&#039;s doing what while they speak breaks the flow in the conversation. Any tips in that regard?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yeah, but— That&#039;s not what— What if— But that doesn&#039;t— What?//</span><br />This was a moment in which I wasn&#039;t sure what to do with the dash, I admit. It&#039;s my understanding that it should be attached to a word if that&#039;s where a sentence ends abruptly, and with a space if it&#039;s more like a side not. What I&#039;m trying to convey here is a constant shifting from one question to the next without the mouth having enough time to convey they whole question, which is also why each word is capitalized after the dash: it&#039;s the start of a new question. You suggested either adding a space at the front of each dash or removing the one after, and lowercasing the following words: is what&#039;s best for what I&#039;m trying to convey here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlonian//</span><br />Is there a term for a citizen of Canterlot other than this? I more or less made it up, I think, and I&#039;m not sure what you mean by there being a typo here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two unicorns looked at one another before back to Carrot Top//</span><br />Similarly, I&#039;m not sure what the missing word here is; I read the sentence out loud as slow as I could, and it still felt fine to me. I could be wrong though.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The conversation was interrupted by the sound of a steam whistle nearby//</span><br />On this note you said, &quot;Then just have the whistle sound,&quot; but later on at the word &quot;BANG&quot;, you say, &quot;It&#039;s preferred to keep sound effects out of narration.&quot; I&#039;m a little confused; how would you describe these two scenarios? <br /><br />I have a problem with semicolons. I recognize that. And I&#039;m glad you pointed this out to me, or I may have gone on thinking that it was fine to use as many as I had. That said, at moments like &quot;This is an advantage; not a handicap&quot;, what I&#039;m trying to convey is that there is a sort of pause there: one that&#039;s too hard for a colon, but a period would make the part after not even a real sentence, and a dash just doesn&#039;t sit right with me. You can let me know if I just need to buck up and deal with something though. Thoughts?<br /><br />Perspective is something I&#039;m aware of but woefully went unchecked in this story. I can&#039;t say for sure why it fell to the wayside, but I&#039;ll be paying closer attention in future edits. Some of your notes come from constant shifts, particularly at the Summer Sun Celebration. Five of the main characters are here, each with their own view on what&#039;s occurring around them; would this scene be better suited to just all be from one perspective? I feel like it would lose something, especially since not all of the characters are right next to one another. Is there an elegant way to jump from one head to the next to get a collective understanding of what&#039;s happening in a scene? Is that even possible?<br /><br />Twice I use the word &quot;sifted&quot;, and twice you noted it as being either wrong or out-of-place. I&#039;m trying to describe the way NMM&#039;s mist would move along the ground, or the way it kinds quickly seeps out of a surface (the word &quot;seeps&quot; obviously sounding a little… thick for what mist should be). Is there a better term I can use here?<br /><br />You mentioned being confused at the command structure in the organization, which one pre-reader has also mentioned to me. I have to say I&#039;m confused at this, as I though I spelled it out pretty clearly when Star and Lyra first arrived in Ponyville. Did things get better as the story went on at least?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;make sense out of two separate inputs coming in at the same time//</span><br />This is more about Lyra not wanting to believe Derpy is better than her in some regard rather than an actual statement on human (pony) capability.<br /><br />You have some comments on Bon Bon and Carrot Top, and their attitudes towards one another and in general. These comments were made before they had a little heart-to-heart, so I&#039;m curious to know if these notes were made after reading that passage, or if it cleared things up at all. If not, I&#039;m willing to go into more detail on what I&#039;m trying to get across with their words to one another, and hopefully find a better way to convey it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Amethyst and Doctor Hooves were approaching decrepit ruins//</span><br />I admit that I didn&#039;t really think too much about the fact that they would have taken a different path from Twilight. In my head I assume that Doctor Hooves knows a quicker path, since he&#039;s more familiar with the forest and Twilight only just arrived, but in hindsight I never explicitly say that. I&#039;m trying to think of a good place where it could naturally come up, and wouldn&#039;t mind some input on the matter. Otherwise I&#039;d hate to just wedge the bit of fact in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He thought he was about to plummet to his death, and he can&#039;t manage any more than mild curiosity?</span><br />It&#039;s part of my characterization for Doctor Hooves. Essentially, nothing really gets him down unless something about his brother comes up. The idea here is that anything, even a near-death experience, anything that can get his mind off of his brother&#039;s passing is a reason for him to be happy. He&#039;s not quite right in the head and doesn&#039;t always react normally, and I think by now you may have seen that a bit. Is it simply not working here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Wow. Doo. Phrasing.&quot;//</span><br />First off, it is a bit of an Archer reference, mostly due to the fact that a binge-watching of the show on a sick day led to this story getting written. The more I think on it though, the more it does feel out of place; I know that making references can take a reader outside of the experience, but somehow that bit of what the story was initially going to be stubbornly stayed around. The other part of having it there though is to highlight Lyra&#039;s mentality: she&#039;s not quite right either, as displayed by some of what she says to Derpy earlier in the section. In some moments she&#039;s serious and bossy, but others she&#039;s making inappropriate jokes. Once again, you can let me know if that&#039;s not coming across the best here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nightmare Moon has not yet arrived here, or surely she would have taken them and left to search for the sixth//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Okay, at the risk of this comment becoming obsolete, pending how the rest of this chapter plays out, how do you explain 1) that Luna and thus Nightmare Moon would know the crystals meant nothing and 2) that it was necessary to return the crystals to the tree at the beginning of season 5?</span><br />1) Luna/NMM believes the crystals are what the story says they are; was that not caught when Hooves is explaining the story at the start of the section?<br />2) This story is only meant to take place during the events of the season premiere. I&#039;ve mulled over ideas for later episodes in the series as sequels to this story, but haven&#039;t solidified anything yet. In the end, regardless of what does and doesn&#039;t get written, it has an Alternate Universe tag for a reason.<br /><br />To recap, I know that some of my biggest problems are maintaining perspective, an overuse of semicolons, and a need to be a bit more showy than telly (my last story was accused of being &quot;purple&quot;; I think that&#039;s left me hesitant to go into too much detail ever since). I plan on revising some of these earlier chapters alongside upcoming ones, where hopefully I can recognize some of these issues before their posting. I really do need to inquire further opinion on the comm formatting, as completely removing it from the story would prove to be a small hassle, and I feel like the story would lose that sense of knowing whether or not a conversation is happening face to face.<br /><br />Again, I know this is above and beyond what you&#039;re meant to do as an EQD pre-reader, so I do highly appreciate your honest and plentiful feedback here. I know it&#039;s not your place to respond to all of the inquiries I have listed here either, so any kind of response would be similarly appreciated. Thank you so much!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 285

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Unexpectedly, she receives a letter saying that her so called "rival" has tragically died and is requested to be at her funeral.//

The "and is requested to be at her funeral" part sounds like it's describing the "rival."

>Her parents had been there a few times for their anniversaries and they said it was always a joyful experience.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>it took her sometime//

In this phrasing, you need a noun object, so "some time" has to be two words.

>lavishing//

Just "lavish." Maybe you were mixing it up with "ravishing"?

>upcoming city//

Upcoming how? Is she riding a train? Flying? Walking? Give me at least a little of how she's getting there and her surroundings.

>She had only spoken with the deceased a few times and they weren’t exactly good memories.//

Needs a comma. And they actually parted on pretty good terms after "Magic Duel." I don't know that I'd characterize it as "not exactly good."

>should you wish to retrieve the contents, but not attend the funeral//

That comma belongs at the beginning of this phrase.

>Final Passing//

Jeez, imagine growing up with that name…

>She tried to take over the town//

It's a completed action in the story's past, so use past perfect tense.

>to prove herself to be superior magician to Twilight Sparkle//

Missing word.

>but banish her and take over the town//

This doesn't quite parse. You sure that "but" isn't supposed to be a "not"? At this point, you're also doing more of an episode rehash than you need to. You can assume your readers are familiar with it.

>Princess Celestia taught her that everyone deserve a second chance//

This is a little contradictory. You just described Celestia as believing in them too, yet she makes Trixie agree to banishment from Ponyville.

>Snip//

Snips.

>or a book//

Well, why didn't she bring one? She should have known she'd have the opportunity to read on the trip. It warrants some explanation.

>if one of her friends came//

Needs past perfect tense. Seems like this might be a consistent problem. Since you're using past-tense narration, whenever you describe an action that happened at an earlier time, use past perfect.

>but nopony was really interested in going or was too busy//

As structured, this is contradictory. It says that nopony was interested or nopony was too busy. That latter isn't what you intended.

>She remembered the regret and pleading in her eyes for acceptance in her apology.//

This is really the emotional attachment that's driving Twilight to attend, so don't gloss over it like this. Let me see what it looked like and how it affected Twilight.

>and even now Twilight didn’t know how to feel about that//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>and only twice had they ever met//

Same.

>; neither of which were under friendly circumstances//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it.

>and she tried to get revenge on her by resorting to dangerous magic//

Okay. There's a section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. Suffice it to say you need to comb through the story for these types of commas and for past perfect tense.

>so called//

Hyphenate most multi-word descriptors.

>glad that//

You sure you meant to italicize both words? It's an odd inflection.

>who they blamed//

Whom

>They wanted to both go//

Move "both" after "they."

>their parents forbid it//

Verb tense.

>Neither of them being big fans of Trixie themselves.//

You haven't been using a conversational style or fragments in the narration, so this really sticks out as something that doesn't fit.

>she saw the train stop at the station//

This has an external feel to it, yet she's on board. Give me some more concrete imagery here. Does she hear the brakes squeal, feel the car lurch when it stops, hear a conductor's whistle, etc.? There so much more you can do to bring this alive.

>Moving through a crowd, ponies//

Misplaced modifier. "Moving through a crowd" describes "ponies" by proximity, but you meant for it to describe Twilight.

>from behind the grave//

The usual phrasing is "beyond."

>Heading to the nearest cab she could find, Twilight told the driver//

Another danger of participial phrases: they make things happen at the same time, yet she wouldn't tell the driver anything until after she'd headed to the cab.

>that were made to look like the pearly gates themselves//

You'e not narrowing down the possibilities from a larger possible selection of gates, so it's a non-restrictive clause. Use "which," not "that," and put a comma before it.

>considering the building’s purpose//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>; possibly relatives who once owned the home before passing it down//

Another misused semicolon. If you can't separate into two complete sentences at the semicolon, it isn't used right, and this piece can't stand on its own as a sentence.

>The most unnerving thing//

Here's the real thing holding this story back. There's little emotion attached to her actions, aside from what the narrator directly feeds me. If you want me to identify with her, concentrate on getting indirectly at how she feels. Where do her thoughts go as she glances around the room? What memories do they bring up? What physical sensations might her thoughts cause? How would someone else there be able to tell how she was feeling just by observing her, reading her body language, her expression, etc.?

>middle aged grey coated//

Hyphenate each modifier, and they're coordinate, so they need a comma: "middle-aged, grey-coated."

>as she was called//

Needs a comma.

>surprised as if he was checking to make sure she was actually real//

Same problem again. Don't draw the conclusion for me. Tell me how he looks and acts, and let me decide that he seems surprised. You have to think like a detective. Give me only the facts, and if you choose the right ones, they'll lead me to the conclusion you want.

>If you follow me please.//

Needs a comma before "please," and the phrasing is usually "you'll."

>she began to wonder what she was going to say and do now that she was finally here//

This is bland. Have her go ahead and wonder. Let m see her thoughts, either as indirect subjective narration or quoted direct thoughts.

>Would Trixie’s family be upset with her?//

There you go. That's what I was talking about. This supersedes the need to even have that phrase I commented on last in the story.

You're doing a lot of switching back and forth between directly quoting her thoughts and having the narrator state them for her. There are times it makes sense to do so, but they're the exception. If you're willing to have the narrator take on her voice, then there's really no need to do quoted thoughts.

>magicians outfit//

Missing apostrophe.

>nervous and confused//

More telly language. There's a more in-depth discussion in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>lavishing//

Same issue as before.

>decorations around was//

Number mismatch.

>This is not//

Verb tense.

>overdoing it//

Hyphenate.

>even pictures of Trixie even//

Repetition.

>peaceful looking//

Hyphenate.

>stone cold//

Hyphenate. And why would it be cold? Room temperature is more likely. And how would Twiight even know? She hasn't touched Trixie.

>If she had know//

Typo.

>the closest thing Trixie has ever had for a friend//

Usually phrased as "to," not "for."

>But how else can one like The Great and Powerful Trixie survive as?//

What's that "as" doing there?

>She just wanted to prove to the world that a nopony like me could be a somepony like you.//

This is pretty much just rehashing what Twilight said about her earlier.

>Trixie… regrets that.//

It's rare for an ellipsis to work well in a letter. How often would you actually write one? It's a speech affectation, and not really a deliberate one, yet writing one is very deliberate.

>its because//

Its/it's confusion.

>who she had nothing but sympathy and respect for//

for whom

>I don’t think you were a bad mare, I think you were just lonely and wanted to be loved.//

Comma splice.

>Go into the afterlife knowing that your suffering is over and that you can rest knowing that one pony will never forget you.//

Repetition of "knowing" phrases.

>last rights//

Last rites. However, this implies some sort of religious ceremony, which is kind of hard to wedge in there without doing the world-building to support it.

>processes//

You sure that's the word choice you want?

>he accepted the money//

But she doesn't have money with her. She said she'd send it.

Really the two biggest things here are commas on the mechanical side and lack of an emotional connection on the aesthetic side, through the use of telly language and skimping on what Twilight feels about things.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Unexpectedly, she receives a letter saying that her so called &quot;rival&quot; has tragically died and is requested to be at her funeral.//</span><br />The &quot;and is requested to be at her funeral&quot; part sounds like it&#039;s describing the &quot;rival.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her parents had been there a few times for their anniversaries and they said it was always a joyful experience.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it took her sometime//</span><br />In this phrasing, you need a noun object, so &quot;some time&quot; has to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lavishing//</span><br />Just &quot;lavish.&quot; Maybe you were mixing it up with &quot;ravishing&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;upcoming city//</span><br />Upcoming how? Is she riding a train? Flying? Walking? Give me at least a little of how she&#039;s getting there and her surroundings.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had only spoken with the deceased a few times and they weren’t exactly good memories.//</span><br />Needs a comma. And they actually parted on pretty good terms after &quot;Magic Duel.&quot; I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d characterize it as &quot;not exactly good.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;should you wish to retrieve the contents, but not attend the funeral//</span><br />That comma belongs at the beginning of this phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Final Passing//</span><br />Jeez, imagine growing up with that name…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She tried to take over the town//</span><br />It&#039;s a completed action in the story&#039;s past, so use past perfect tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to prove herself to be superior magician to Twilight Sparkle//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but banish her and take over the town//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t quite parse. You sure that &quot;but&quot; isn&#039;t supposed to be a &quot;not&quot;? At this point, you&#039;re also doing more of an episode rehash than you need to. You can assume your readers are familiar with it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Princess Celestia taught her that everyone deserve a second chance//</span><br />This is a little contradictory. You just described Celestia as believing in them too, yet she makes Trixie agree to banishment from Ponyville.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Snip//</span><br />Snips.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or a book//</span><br />Well, why didn&#039;t she bring one? She should have known she&#039;d have the opportunity to read on the trip. It warrants some explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if one of her friends came//</span><br />Needs past perfect tense. Seems like this might be a consistent problem. Since you&#039;re using past-tense narration, whenever you describe an action that happened at an earlier time, use past perfect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but nopony was really interested in going or was too busy//</span><br />As structured, this is contradictory. It says that nopony was interested or nopony was too busy. That latter isn&#039;t what you intended.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She remembered the regret and pleading in her eyes for acceptance in her apology.//</span><br />This is really the emotional attachment that&#039;s driving Twilight to attend, so don&#039;t gloss over it like this. Let me see what it looked like and how it affected Twilight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and even now Twilight didn’t know how to feel about that//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and only twice had they ever met//</span><br />Same.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;; neither of which were under friendly circumstances//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she tried to get revenge on her by resorting to dangerous magic//</span><br />Okay. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread on comma use with conjunctions. Suffice it to say you need to comb through the story for these types of commas and for past perfect tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so called//</span><br />Hyphenate most multi-word descriptors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>glad that</i>//</span><br />You sure you meant to italicize both words? It&#039;s an odd inflection.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who they blamed//</span><br />Whom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They wanted to both go//</span><br />Move &quot;both&quot; after &quot;they.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;their parents forbid it//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Neither of them being big fans of Trixie themselves.//</span><br />You haven&#039;t been using a conversational style or fragments in the narration, so this really sticks out as something that doesn&#039;t fit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she saw the train stop at the station//</span><br />This has an external feel to it, yet she&#039;s on board. Give me some more concrete imagery here. Does she hear the brakes squeal, feel the car lurch when it stops, hear a conductor&#039;s whistle, etc.? There so much more you can do to bring this alive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Moving through a crowd, ponies//</span><br />Misplaced modifier. &quot;Moving through a crowd&quot; describes &quot;ponies&quot; by proximity, but you meant for it to describe Twilight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;from behind the grave//</span><br />The usual phrasing is &quot;beyond.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Heading to the nearest cab she could find, Twilight told the driver//</span><br />Another danger of participial phrases: they make things happen at the same time, yet she wouldn&#039;t tell the driver anything until after she&#039;d headed to the cab.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that were made to look like the pearly gates themselves//</span><br />You&#039;e not narrowing down the possibilities from a larger possible selection of gates, so it&#039;s a non-restrictive clause. Use &quot;which,&quot; not &quot;that,&quot; and put a comma before it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;considering the building’s purpose//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;; possibly relatives who once owned the home before passing it down//</span><br />Another misused semicolon. If you can&#039;t separate into two complete sentences at the semicolon, it isn&#039;t used right, and this piece can&#039;t stand on its own as a sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The most unnerving thing//</span><br />Here&#039;s the real thing holding this story back. There&#039;s little emotion attached to her actions, aside from what the narrator directly feeds me. If you want me to identify with her, concentrate on getting indirectly at how she feels. Where do her thoughts go as she glances around the room? What memories do they bring up? What physical sensations might her thoughts cause? How would someone else there be able to tell how she was feeling just by observing her, reading her body language, her expression, etc.?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;middle aged grey coated//</span><br />Hyphenate each modifier, and they&#039;re coordinate, so they need a comma: &quot;middle-aged, grey-coated.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she was called//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;surprised as if he was checking to make sure she was actually real//</span><br />Same problem again. Don&#039;t draw the conclusion for me. Tell me how he looks and acts, and let me decide that he seems surprised. You have to think like a detective. Give me only the facts, and if you choose the right ones, they&#039;ll lead me to the conclusion you want.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If you follow me please.//</span><br />Needs a comma before &quot;please,&quot; and the phrasing is usually &quot;you&#039;ll.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she began to wonder what she was going to say and do now that she was finally here//</span><br />This is bland. Have her go ahead and wonder. Let m see her thoughts, either as indirect subjective narration or quoted direct thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Would Trixie’s family be upset with her?//</span><br />There you go. That&#039;s what I was talking about. This supersedes the need to even have that phrase I commented on last in the story.<br /><br />You&#039;re doing a lot of switching back and forth between directly quoting her thoughts and having the narrator state them for her. There are times it makes sense to do so, but they&#039;re the exception. If you&#039;re willing to have the narrator take on her voice, then there&#039;s really no need to do quoted thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;magicians outfit//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nervous and confused//</span><br />More telly language. There&#039;s a more in-depth discussion in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lavishing//</span><br />Same issue as before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;decorations around was//</span><br />Number mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This is not//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;overdoing it//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even pictures of Trixie even//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;peaceful looking//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stone cold//</span><br />Hyphenate. And why would it be cold? Room temperature is more likely. And how would Twiight even know? She hasn&#039;t touched Trixie.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If she had know//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the closest thing Trixie has ever had for a friend//</span><br />Usually phrased as &quot;to,&quot; not &quot;for.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But how else can one like The Great and Powerful Trixie survive as?//</span><br />What&#039;s that &quot;as&quot; doing there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She just wanted to prove to the world that a nopony like me could be a somepony like you.//</span><br />This is pretty much just rehashing what Twilight said about her earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Trixie… regrets that.//</span><br />It&#039;s rare for an ellipsis to work well in a letter. How often would you actually write one? It&#039;s a speech affectation, and not really a deliberate one, yet writing one is very deliberate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its because//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who she had nothing but sympathy and respect for//</span><br />for whom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t think you were a bad mare, I think you were just lonely and wanted to be loved.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Go into the afterlife knowing that your suffering is over and that you can rest knowing that one pony will never forget you.//</span><br />Repetition of &quot;knowing&quot; phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;last rights//</span><br />Last rites. However, this implies some sort of religious ceremony, which is kind of hard to wedge in there without doing the world-building to support it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;processes//</span><br />You sure that&#039;s the word choice you want?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he accepted the money//</span><br />But she doesn&#039;t have money with her. She said she&#039;d send it.<br /><br />Really the two biggest things here are commas on the mechanical side and lack of an emotional connection on the aesthetic side, through the use of telly language and skimping on what Twilight feels about things.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 286

>>131065
Author of said story here. Thank you so much for taking the time to write a detailed review, I really appreciate it and will attempt to correct all errors and resubmit in a day or two. Is there anything different about the process when I do so, besides checking the "this has been submitted before" box?
Before then I'll probably post another reply here regarding one item of feedback or another. Thanks again!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131065" onclick="return highlight('131065', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131065">&gt;&gt;131065</a><br />Author of said story here. Thank you so much for taking the time to write a detailed review, I really appreciate it and will attempt to correct all errors and resubmit in a day or two. Is there anything different about the process when I do so, besides checking the &quot;this has been submitted before&quot; box?<br />Before then I&#039;ll probably post another reply here regarding one item of feedback or another. Thanks again!<br />

Rated PonystarCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 287

>>131069
thank you for the feedback. I'll fix what you suggested and send it again tomorrow. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131069" onclick="return highlight('131069', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131069">&gt;&gt;131069</a><br />thank you for the feedback. I&#039;ll fix what you suggested and send it again tomorrow.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 288

>>131068
On the comm traffic formatting:
I personally don't like it, and I've seen it done effectively elsewhere without the need to resort to something like this, but it's certainly not unheard of, and it does create the effect you want it to. I'm not sure if you could get a book published looking like this, for example, but it's not a point I'm prepared to hold up your story over.

"To be" verbs:
There are times that using them is unavoidable. If you at least consider the alternatives and use them when you can, then it's a problem that usually solves itself. Auxiliary verbs do count toward this, and they're also unavoidable at times, but this is one usage that's often unnecessary. Given that most fiction is told in past tense, there's a very fine line between the meanings of "He did this action" and "He was doing this action." Most times that writers use the latter phrasing, they could have used the former without changing the meaning at all, and it's a more active construct to boot. There are times that the latter does imply something different, and then it's fine to use it, which is generally instances where it's important for some reason to make sure the reader knows that the action kept going on after the narrator's attention diverts elsewhere.

LUS:
There are certain things that can easily be repeated without drawing near as much attention. Things like "a," "the," "said," pronouns, and names go by largely unnoticed. So I wouldn't worry too much about overusing names, but there are times where LUS is justified. You do have some of those in your story, so I wasn't necessarily referring to every usage in the story. Where it makes sense is instances where a lot of characters are present, so that names do get overused and pronouns get ambiguous. If you find yourself having to repeat a name nearly every sentence to avoid being unclear, then LUS may be necessary. Another time is where the descriptor actually adds some new information we didn't already know about the character.

In your case, I could tell in places that you were trying to create a feel of the focus character's unfamiliarity with another character, but style helps a lot there, particularly since you use a more subjective narration. You could use the narration to your advantage to make the LUS feel natural, say:

Lyra watched the pink pony run outside.

versus:

Lyra watched-what was her name?-the pink pony run outside.

One's simply a narrative phrasing while the other creates an effect with it to make it sound natural and in the character's voice.

Talking heads:
There's not a lot in the way of advice to be had here. It mostly takes going back over your own work and thinking about it. Is there much in the way of narration beyond "he said"? Do you see huge patches of the screen contained in quotation marks without much in between? Based only on what's presented in the writing, can you visualize what the characters look like as they talk, in terms of both physical appearance and what they're doing?

Like any rule, there are exceptions. It's possible for a conversation to be so engaging that the reader won't notice the talking heads, particularly if they're very intense and the characters (often in a limited narration) are so focused on the situation that they don't really notice what else is going on. This almost requires that nothing else interesting be going on, though. It's one thing to neglect a character's posture while he's having hostile questions shouted at him in an interrogation room, because that's not where his attention will be. It's quite another if he's in the middle of a battle, but he somehow loses cognizance of everything but the words being spoken. Another case would be where the characters can't see each other, because they're separated by a barrier, in a dark room, on the phone, etc. Then you might only get the nonverbal parts from one side or neither.

Dashes:
You do need to be consistent about the spacing. You normally see em dashes without spaces (used pretty universally by Americans and often for interruptions only by Brits) or en dashes with spaces (used mostly by Brits either universally or for asides only). A dash does provide a little different cadence than a period or a semicolon, and while in spirit, it's more meant to have a partial sentence on one side or another, I'll place one between complete sentences at times to get that cadence. In those specific cases, it's not wrong to capitalize after them, but I usually don't, just for the uniformity of it and because the reader isn't going to notice the difference and interpret it that way anyway, unless he's a particularly fastidious grammarian.

>Canterlonian

I've just always seen it as Canterlotian, though I don't know if canon has ever used a term for it.

>The two unicorns looked at one another before back to Carrot Top

It really feels like there's a missing verb in there. The "before back" combo has an awkward flow to it.

Bang and whistle:
By having the whistle sound, I didn't mean to put a "TWEET!" in there. It'd still need a description of the sound, just like the comment I left for the "BANG." My issue here is that the conversation gets interrupted by the whistle. So don't have the narrator tell me it gets interrupted. Just get straight to the whistle. This is for two reasons: The conversation gets interrupted anyway, so it's redundant for the narrator to tell me that. And by giving the narrator time between the actual interruption and telling me what caused it, you undercut the feeling of suddenness. When something gets interrupted, the very next word needs to be the interruption, or you lose the authenticity of it.

Semicolons:
In the example you cited, a comma would work perfectly fine. A period there would create a sentence fragment, which actually wouldn't be out of place in the narrative style you use, but I agree that it makes too much of a stop in this case. You have a full range of stops available, some with their own grammatical restrictions: period, comma, semicolon, dash, ellipsis. In cases where one is grammatically incorrect, you can generally find one of the others that will do fine. For the comma in particular, there are times that dialogue or a limited narrator can use them incorrectly in effective ways, though that's more by feel than anything else. The semicolon is such a formal thing, though, that it doesn't work well when used incorrectly. Just having it there in the first place connotes an attention to detail that makes errors look out of place, intentional or not.

Perspective:
I don't remember if I did so in your review, but I'll refer you to the section on head hopping at the top of this thread. It's better to stay with a single character where possible, at least within a scene, but there are times that a shift is needed. The material up top give the overview and the important questions to ask before committing to a perspective shift, so I won't repeat them here.

It's easier to get away with abrupt or frequent shifts in an action scene specifically, but in general, they work better when the work is of sufficient length (think novel) that the reader will very quickly recognize any given character by their unique voicing, such that they can easily follow your wandering focus. This is after the reader is acquainted with them enough that they already identify with them. In a shorter work, it just prevents the reader from ever getting to know any of them that well, so he's less engaged and sympathetic with them.

sifting:
In both cases, I wondered whether you'd meant "shifting," which would be kind of a bland word choice anyway. The only definitions for "sift" I've ever seen refer to filtering through something to get particular bits out. That's not what's going on here, since you appear to be trying to relate some sort of movement. There are a lot you could use, depending on how you want to characterize that movement. Just check a thesaurus. A couple that immediately come to mind are slither, skulk, waft… there are many possibilities.

Command structure:
I'm sure that at some point, you defined each character's role, but it just didn't stick with me, and that's probably for two reasons.

For one, that information was scattered through different parts of the story. If it were all in the same place, I'd have gotten it straight all at once, but when one relationship's defined in chapter 1, and another doesn't come along until halfway through chapter 2, now I have to go back and remember what exactly the first one was before I can put the second in context. And like me, most readers aren't going to care about that point enough to read back through and clear things up.

Second, that may not even be necessary if the characters behave in consistent ways toward each other, but here, characters who are subordinate to others seem to take command at times, and the superior officers defer to them. At one time, character A will yell at character B and make her back down, and at another, character B will be yelling, "That's an order!" and I find myself thinking, "Wait, I thought A was in command."

I was caught off guard multiple times by Lyra, Bon Bon, and Derpy all acting in ways inconsistent with where I thought they fell in the pecking order, so either they were, or my perception of the pecking order was wrong. Both are problems.

Bon Bon and Carrot Top:
I made the notes as I read, so if new information came up later, the comment wouldn't reflect that, unless I specifically said so. In that case, I would have gone back to edit the comment or delete it. You did go into their feelings toward each other to a degree, and I get that one is upset about the doctor's brother, but I'm unclear on her motivation. I don't know why she feels compelled to take up his cause, especially when she's quick to acknowledge that a tough decision had to be made at the time.

Taking a quicker path through the forest than Twilight:
It wouldn't be hard to explain this. First, it'd be a concern of theirs anyway, since Twilight had a head start. They'd need to make up the time somehow. Since they should know their mark well anyway, perhaps they knew Twilight would stick to the established paths and roads through the forest, but by cutting directly through the trees, they could take a more direct route.

Doctor Hooves:
He comes across as pretty bland about nearly everything. It's not like he seems happy at the distraction of nearly dying. It's more like he shrugs it off entirely. He'd at least be scared, even if the thrill brings him out of his blue funk. But he never even appears to be in a funk. He pretty much doesn't react to anything at all. It's like he's oblivious to everything, which would occur if he was preoccupied with something, but we never get a clue as to what that is. I can surmise it's his brother, but he never acts like it bothers him when the brother is brought up.

Phrasing:
It's not that so many readers will see this as an Archer reference and discount it. It's a common enough expression anyway that it'd probably weather well. It's more that it felt out of place in the conversation. They were discussing some serious things, and then Lyra just comes across as an asshole. They weren't joking around, so it completely changes the tone of their talk at that point, and they don't seem to have the type of friendly relationship where Lyra could suddenly take it in an antagonistic direction without Derpy taking offense. You wouldn't say something like that to your boss on the first day of work, for instance, but you might after you've known him after 10 years and gotten together to do things outside work frequently, so there's an established familiarity.

The crystals:
Maybe I missed exactly what Star is trying to do. It sounded to me like there were never any such crystals to contain the elements and the doctor is making that part up because he knows that Twilight is interpreting the elements as physical objects, so he might as well give her a placebo to focus her energy. But that would contradict canon, where Luna had possession of such stones, used them herself against Discord, and had them used against her by Celestia.

So if they were never real, wouldn't she know that? Or were they real at one time but aren't anymore, yet the doctor still wants to create that placebo as if they were still stones for the same effect I already described? If that's the case, there's no explanation to lead me in that direction. This also gets to my question about the tree: if these crystals aren't the real elements, then why does returning them to the tree later in canon work?

If you want to say that this story doesn't necessarily follow canon after season 1 or some other arbitrary point, then go ahead and say it, but many readers see that as lazy. AU can say "the elements never were stones," but that's an oddly specific point upon which to branch a universe, especially since this shouldn't be a tough thing to explain.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131068" onclick="return highlight('131068', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131068">&gt;&gt;131068</a><br />On the comm traffic formatting:<br />I personally don&#039;t like it, and I&#039;ve seen it done effectively elsewhere without the need to resort to something like this, but it&#039;s certainly not unheard of, and it does create the effect you want it to. I&#039;m not sure if you could get a book published looking like this, for example, but it&#039;s not a point I&#039;m prepared to hold up your story over.<br /><br />&quot;To be&quot; verbs:<br />There are times that using them is unavoidable. If you at least consider the alternatives and use them when you can, then it&#039;s a problem that usually solves itself. Auxiliary verbs do count toward this, and they&#039;re also unavoidable at times, but this is one usage that&#039;s often unnecessary. Given that most fiction is told in past tense, there&#039;s a very fine line between the meanings of &quot;He did this action&quot; and &quot;He was doing this action.&quot; Most times that writers use the latter phrasing, they could have used the former without changing the meaning at all, and it&#039;s a more active construct to boot. There are times that the latter does imply something different, and then it&#039;s fine to use it, which is generally instances where it&#039;s important for some reason to make sure the reader knows that the action kept going on after the narrator&#039;s attention diverts elsewhere.<br /><br />LUS:<br />There are certain things that can easily be repeated without drawing near as much attention. Things like &quot;a,&quot; &quot;the,&quot; &quot;said,&quot; pronouns, and names go by largely unnoticed. So I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about overusing names, but there are times where LUS is justified. You do have some of those in your story, so I wasn&#039;t necessarily referring to every usage in the story. Where it makes sense is instances where a lot of characters are present, so that names do get overused and pronouns get ambiguous. If you find yourself having to repeat a name nearly every sentence to avoid being unclear, then LUS may be necessary. Another time is where the descriptor actually adds some new information we didn&#039;t already know about the character.<br /><br />In your case, I could tell in places that you were trying to create a feel of the focus character&#039;s unfamiliarity with another character, but style helps a lot there, particularly since you use a more subjective narration. You could use the narration to your advantage to make the LUS feel natural, say:<br /><br />Lyra watched the pink pony run outside.<br /><br />versus:<br /><br />Lyra watched-what was her name?-the pink pony run outside.<br /><br />One&#039;s simply a narrative phrasing while the other creates an effect with it to make it sound natural and in the character&#039;s voice.<br /><br />Talking heads:<br />There&#039;s not a lot in the way of advice to be had here. It mostly takes going back over your own work and thinking about it. Is there much in the way of narration beyond &quot;he said&quot;? Do you see huge patches of the screen contained in quotation marks without much in between? Based only on what&#039;s presented in the writing, can you visualize what the characters look like as they talk, in terms of both physical appearance and what they&#039;re doing?<br /><br />Like any rule, there are exceptions. It&#039;s possible for a conversation to be so engaging that the reader won&#039;t notice the talking heads, particularly if they&#039;re very intense and the characters (often in a limited narration) are so focused on the situation that they don&#039;t really notice what else is going on. This almost requires that nothing else interesting be going on, though. It&#039;s one thing to neglect a character&#039;s posture while he&#039;s having hostile questions shouted at him in an interrogation room, because that&#039;s not where his attention will be. It&#039;s quite another if he&#039;s in the middle of a battle, but he somehow loses cognizance of everything but the words being spoken. Another case would be where the characters can&#039;t see each other, because they&#039;re separated by a barrier, in a dark room, on the phone, etc. Then you might only get the nonverbal parts from one side or neither.<br /><br />Dashes:<br />You do need to be consistent about the spacing. You normally see em dashes without spaces (used pretty universally by Americans and often for interruptions only by Brits) or en dashes with spaces (used mostly by Brits either universally or for asides only). A dash does provide a little different cadence than a period or a semicolon, and while in spirit, it&#039;s more meant to have a partial sentence on one side or another, I&#039;ll place one between complete sentences at times to get that cadence. In those specific cases, it&#039;s not wrong to capitalize after them, but I usually don&#039;t, just for the uniformity of it and because the reader isn&#039;t going to notice the difference and interpret it that way anyway, unless he&#039;s a particularly fastidious grammarian.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlonian</span><br />I&#039;ve just always seen it as Canterlotian, though I don&#039;t know if canon has ever used a term for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The two unicorns looked at one another before back to Carrot Top</span><br />It really feels like there&#039;s a missing verb in there. The &quot;before back&quot; combo has an awkward flow to it.<br /><br />Bang and whistle:<br />By having the whistle sound, I didn&#039;t mean to put a &quot;TWEET!&quot; in there. It&#039;d still need a description of the sound, just like the comment I left for the &quot;BANG.&quot; My issue here is that the conversation gets interrupted by the whistle. So don&#039;t have the narrator tell me it gets interrupted. Just get straight to the whistle. This is for two reasons: The conversation gets interrupted anyway, so it&#039;s redundant for the narrator to tell me that. And by giving the narrator time between the actual interruption and telling me what caused it, you undercut the feeling of suddenness. When something gets interrupted, the very next word needs to be the interruption, or you lose the authenticity of it.<br /><br />Semicolons:<br />In the example you cited, a comma would work perfectly fine. A period there would create a sentence fragment, which actually wouldn&#039;t be out of place in the narrative style you use, but I agree that it makes too much of a stop in this case. You have a full range of stops available, some with their own grammatical restrictions: period, comma, semicolon, dash, ellipsis. In cases where one is grammatically incorrect, you can generally find one of the others that will do fine. For the comma in particular, there are times that dialogue or a limited narrator can use them incorrectly in effective ways, though that&#039;s more by feel than anything else. The semicolon is such a formal thing, though, that it doesn&#039;t work well when used incorrectly. Just having it there in the first place connotes an attention to detail that makes errors look out of place, intentional or not.<br /><br />Perspective:<br />I don&#039;t remember if I did so in your review, but I&#039;ll refer you to the section on head hopping at the top of this thread. It&#039;s better to stay with a single character where possible, at least within a scene, but there are times that a shift is needed. The material up top give the overview and the important questions to ask before committing to a perspective shift, so I won&#039;t repeat them here.<br /><br />It&#039;s easier to get away with abrupt or frequent shifts in an action scene specifically, but in general, they work better when the work is of sufficient length (think novel) that the reader will very quickly recognize any given character by their unique voicing, such that they can easily follow your wandering focus. This is after the reader is acquainted with them enough that they already identify with them. In a shorter work, it just prevents the reader from ever getting to know any of them that well, so he&#039;s less engaged and sympathetic with them.<br /><br />sifting:<br />In both cases, I wondered whether you&#039;d meant &quot;shifting,&quot; which would be kind of a bland word choice anyway. The only definitions for &quot;sift&quot; I&#039;ve ever seen refer to filtering through something to get particular bits out. That&#039;s not what&#039;s going on here, since you appear to be trying to relate some sort of movement. There are a lot you could use, depending on how you want to characterize that movement. Just check a thesaurus. A couple that immediately come to mind are slither, skulk, waft… there are many possibilities.<br /><br />Command structure:<br />I&#039;m sure that at some point, you defined each character&#039;s role, but it just didn&#039;t stick with me, and that&#039;s probably for two reasons.<br /><br />For one, that information was scattered through different parts of the story. If it were all in the same place, I&#039;d have gotten it straight all at once, but when one relationship&#039;s defined in chapter 1, and another doesn&#039;t come along until halfway through chapter 2, now I have to go back and remember what exactly the first one was before I can put the second in context. And like me, most readers aren&#039;t going to care about that point enough to read back through and clear things up.<br /><br />Second, that may not even be necessary if the characters behave in consistent ways toward each other, but here, characters who are subordinate to others seem to take command at times, and the superior officers defer to them. At one time, character A will yell at character B and make her back down, and at another, character B will be yelling, &quot;That&#039;s an order!&quot; and I find myself thinking, &quot;Wait, I thought A was in command.&quot;<br /><br />I was caught off guard multiple times by Lyra, Bon Bon, and Derpy all acting in ways inconsistent with where I thought they fell in the pecking order, so either they were, or my perception of the pecking order was wrong. Both are problems.<br /><br />Bon Bon and Carrot Top:<br />I made the notes as I read, so if new information came up later, the comment wouldn&#039;t reflect that, unless I specifically said so. In that case, I would have gone back to edit the comment or delete it. You did go into their feelings toward each other to a degree, and I get that one is upset about the doctor&#039;s brother, but I&#039;m unclear on her motivation. I don&#039;t know why she feels compelled to take up his cause, especially when she&#039;s quick to acknowledge that a tough decision had to be made at the time.<br /><br />Taking a quicker path through the forest than Twilight:<br />It wouldn&#039;t be hard to explain this. First, it&#039;d be a concern of theirs anyway, since Twilight had a head start. They&#039;d need to make up the time somehow. Since they should know their mark well anyway, perhaps they knew Twilight would stick to the established paths and roads through the forest, but by cutting directly through the trees, they could take a more direct route.<br /><br />Doctor Hooves:<br />He comes across as pretty bland about nearly everything. It&#039;s not like he seems happy at the distraction of nearly dying. It&#039;s more like he shrugs it off entirely. He&#039;d at least be scared, even if the thrill brings him out of his blue funk. But he never even appears to be in a funk. He pretty much doesn&#039;t react to anything at all. It&#039;s like he&#039;s oblivious to everything, which would occur if he was preoccupied with something, but we never get a clue as to what that is. I can surmise it&#039;s his brother, but he never acts like it bothers him when the brother is brought up.<br /><br />Phrasing:<br />It&#039;s not that so many readers will see this as an Archer reference and discount it. It&#039;s a common enough expression anyway that it&#039;d probably weather well. It&#039;s more that it felt out of place in the conversation. They were discussing some serious things, and then Lyra just comes across as an asshole. They weren&#039;t joking around, so it completely changes the tone of their talk at that point, and they don&#039;t seem to have the type of friendly relationship where Lyra could suddenly take it in an antagonistic direction without Derpy taking offense. You wouldn&#039;t say something like that to your boss on the first day of work, for instance, but you might after you&#039;ve known him after 10 years and gotten together to do things outside work frequently, so there&#039;s an established familiarity.<br /><br />The crystals:<br />Maybe I missed exactly what Star is trying to do. It sounded to me like there were never any such crystals to contain the elements and the doctor is making that part up because he knows that Twilight is interpreting the elements as physical objects, so he might as well give her a placebo to focus her energy. But that would contradict canon, where Luna had possession of such stones, used them herself against Discord, and had them used against her by Celestia.<br /><br />So if they were never real, wouldn&#039;t she know that? Or were they real at one time but aren&#039;t anymore, yet the doctor still wants to create that placebo as if they were still stones for the same effect I already described? If that&#039;s the case, there&#039;s no explanation to lead me in that direction. This also gets to my question about the tree: if these crystals aren&#039;t the real elements, then why does returning them to the tree later in canon work?<br /><br />If you want to say that this story doesn&#039;t necessarily follow canon after season 1 or some other arbitrary point, then go ahead and say it, but many readers see that as lazy. AU can say &quot;the elements never were stones,&quot; but that&#039;s an oddly specific point upon which to branch a universe, especially since this shouldn&#039;t be a tough thing to explain.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 289

>>131070
Yes, submit it the same way you did last time, and select the option saying the story has been submitted before.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131070" onclick="return highlight('131070', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131070">&gt;&gt;131070</a><br />Yes, submit it the same way you did last time, and select the option saying the story has been submitted before.<br />

Feedback Response Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 290

>>131073
Okay, I think at this point I see where you're coming on everything, but it sounds like the crystal thing is still causing some confusion, especially where season four is concerned. I'll describe it all as best I can:

It's never told how exactly Celestia defeated Nightmare Moon, but the commonly accepted story is that she used something called the Elements of Harmony. This story is one she made up to distract Nightmare Moon if she were to return. As far as why they're seen in Twilight's flashbacks in the season four premiere, well, that could easily be attributed to some sort of drug-induced visions spurred by subconscious programming, or something of the like. I really don't think that one would be too far of a stretch. Regarding the tree, we know the Celestia and Luna were there when Twilight and her friends discovered it. They claim that it's always been there, but it's also possible that it was recently planted. I am working on a way of expanding the Elements from placebo trinkets into something much more meaningful, but that would be part of another story, should I decide to follow this one up.

tl;dr The Elements are fake and I'm working on some head canon for if/when we get to that point, though it wouldn't be for a long while from now. I have a few notes on where I could take the story in later follow-ups, but nothing too seriously considered at the moment.

You know, it's moments like this I envy those who wrote stories before expanded canon started screwing with too much, haha<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131073" onclick="return highlight('131073', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131073">&gt;&gt;131073</a><br />Okay, I think at this point I see where you&#039;re coming on everything, but it sounds like the crystal thing is still causing some confusion, especially where season four is concerned. I&#039;ll describe it all as best I can:<br /><br />It&#039;s never told how exactly Celestia defeated Nightmare Moon, but the commonly accepted story is that she used something called the Elements of Harmony. This story is one she made up to distract Nightmare Moon if she were to return. As far as why they&#039;re seen in Twilight&#039;s flashbacks in the season four premiere, well, that could easily be attributed to some sort of drug-induced visions spurred by subconscious programming, or something of the like. I really don&#039;t think that one would be too far of a stretch. Regarding the tree, we know the Celestia and Luna were there when Twilight and her friends discovered it. They claim that it&#039;s always been there, but it&#039;s also possible that it was recently planted. I am working on a way of expanding the Elements from placebo trinkets into something much more meaningful, but that would be part of another story, should I decide to follow this one up.<br /><br />tl;dr The Elements are fake and I&#039;m working on some head canon for if/when we get to that point, though it wouldn&#039;t be for a long while from now. I have a few notes on where I could take the story in later follow-ups, but nothing too seriously considered at the moment.<br /><br />You know, it&#039;s moments like this I envy those who wrote stories before expanded canon started screwing with too much, haha<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 291

>>131075
But before Celestia used the elements on Nightmare Moon, Luna used them on Discord. So was Celestia fooling her even then? If so, why? Otherwise, Luna would know they weren't real. Or are you using AU to say Discord never happened?<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131075" onclick="return highlight('131075', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131075">&gt;&gt;131075</a><br />But before Celestia used the elements on Nightmare Moon, Luna used them on Discord. So was Celestia fooling her even then? If so, why? Otherwise, Luna would know they weren&#039;t real. Or are you using AU to say Discord never happened?<br />

Feedback Response Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 292

>>131076
What I'm saying is that Twilight's visions never happened. We only see those flashbacks as the result of her drinking a potion, and those visions could be explained any number of ways. Everything we know about the Elements comes from second-hand accounts. Review the season two premiere does have Celestia stating that she and Luna used the Elements against Discord, but again, I can probably come up with something for why she says this if need be.

Otherwise, I can probably use the freedom AU gives me by saying that things are close here, but not quite.

Am I still not making sense? It feels like we're going in a few circles on this topic, and I apologize for that :/<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131076" onclick="return highlight('131076', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131076">&gt;&gt;131076</a><br />What I&#039;m saying is that Twilight&#039;s visions never happened. We only see those flashbacks as the result of her drinking a potion, and those visions could be explained any number of ways. Everything we know about the Elements comes from second-hand accounts. Review the season two premiere does have Celestia stating that she and Luna used the Elements against Discord, but again, I can probably come up with something for why she says this if need be.<br /><br />Otherwise, I can probably use the freedom AU gives me by saying that things are close here, but not quite.<br /><br />Am I still not making sense? It feels like we&#039;re going in a few circles on this topic, and I apologize for that :/<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 293

>>131078
It's not that big a deal, but it's kind of a minor point to make a divergence on, since it probably wouldn't be hard to come up with an explanation. When you change the entire world or a landmark event, that's expected of AU, but when you only change a detail from canon, and it ends up not changing how things turn out anyway, it does make me wonder why it was necessary. Say she needs to make new stones because there are real ones, but the PPP know that Twilight would need something tangible to manifest them, for instance. They figure she'll have enough confidence in something she can see that she'll attack NMM, her friends will help her, and the real stones will materialize from the friendship. And then the fake stones get smashed anyway, as in canon, but Twilight makes the leap they didn't think she could and realizes that it's her friends' qualities that are the real power. That's at least the way I thought you were going to play it.

Give it some thought. It's not the kind of thing I'd get too hung up on, but it will stick out to some readers that it contradicts canon while it's not clear it had to, especially since most AU stories would really play up the break from canon and acknowledge it openly. This is pretty understated.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131078" onclick="return highlight('131078', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131078">&gt;&gt;131078</a><br />It&#039;s not that big a deal, but it&#039;s kind of a minor point to make a divergence on, since it probably wouldn&#039;t be hard to come up with an explanation. When you change the entire world or a landmark event, that&#039;s expected of AU, but when you only change a detail from canon, and it ends up not changing how things turn out anyway, it does make me wonder why it was necessary. Say she needs to make new stones because there are real ones, but the PPP know that Twilight would need something tangible to manifest them, for instance. They figure she&#039;ll have enough confidence in something she can see that she&#039;ll attack NMM, her friends will help her, and the real stones will materialize from the friendship. And then the fake stones get smashed anyway, as in canon, but Twilight makes the leap they didn&#039;t think she could and realizes that it&#039;s her friends&#039; qualities that are the real power. That&#039;s at least the way I thought you were going to play it.<br /><br />Give it some thought. It&#039;s not the kind of thing I&#039;d get too hung up on, but it will stick out to some readers that it contradicts canon while it&#039;s not clear it had to, especially since most AU stories would really play up the break from canon and acknowledge it openly. This is pretty understated.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 294

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'll give a shorter-form review than I normally do because it's mostly just continued instances of the same few things.

The sentence structure get a little repetitive at the beginning. Your first two speaking tags have a participle tacked on, and soon after, there's an absolute phrase, which is another participle structure. You don't continue to be repetitive like this, so just clean up that first impression.

Look how many times you use direct address in this first conversation. Then think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation.

Hyphenating words is fine, but when there's an interruption or aside, please use a proper dash. There's a guide to dash use at the top of this thread.

Would Sunset, being from Equestria, really wear leather, as in dead cow skins?

There are quite a few instances of telly language. There's a discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread, so go read that. Here, I'll just say to avoid directly naming a character's emotion or attitude in the narration except when it's a little throwaway moment that doesn't need to draw the reader into the character's situation. See how many times you use "in disbelief," for example.

Sunset's last three attributions of the first scene are all "Sunset replied," plus one of Rarity's mixed in. For that matter, you use an awful lot of unusual speaking verbs. There's also a section on saidisms up top you should read.

It's preferred to use italics only for emphasis. For the most part, you'll want to stay away from bold or all caps.

>It was Sonata’s turn to roll her eyes now. “Ugh, I told you why I’m here. It’s your turn now, dur!”//

Watch the repetition of referring to turns.

>‘o//

The elision is o', but also note that smart quotes always draw leading apostrophes backward. This turns up elsewhere in the story, too. Please turn them the right way.

Tone down Applejack's accent. It's quite thick, to the point that it slows me down to read it. That's a bad thing.

>“I’m sorry about my van, Rainbow Dash,” Fluttershy said, apologizing//

She clearly apologized. It's redundant to say it again.

>I spent my morning practicing for a track meet and my stomach’s gonna implode if I don’t get some lunch soon!//

This is another thing you do intermittently. You need a comma between the clauses.

>in an attempt to explain why she didn’t come to them about Sonata’s employment at Five Alarm Taco//

Don't overexplain things in the narration. If you write her body language and actions well, the reader will get this.

>who was somewhat furiously attacking her taco salad. She looked up from her eating at the rest of them after a few moments of the girls watching her voraciously devour her food//

Pretty redundant again.

>attempting to further explain what she meant//

More overexplanation.

>…huh?//

Unless it's completing a sentence previously left hanging, capitalize after a leading ellipsis.

>still exhausting nonetheless//

Redundant

>think?//

You'll normally include ! or ? in the italics.

>saying her peace//

The idiom is "saying her piece."

>Sonata felt panic tugging at her//

I haven't really been pointing out specific examples of telly language, but this one is crucial. It's the emotional high point of the story, and now is not the time to have the narrator spoon-feed me the conclusions.

>Specifically, she remembered all the fun she’d been having.//

This is pretty bland. Be specific, but not necessarily wordy. What instances of fun does she remember? How did they make her feel? Again, not in a telly way. Convey that feeling through imagery and maybe what physical sensations they caused.

>Adagio didn’t know who to be more angry with: Sonata, or Sunset.//

First off, read the section on head hopping, too. You'd actually done a good job of keeping much of each scene in a single character's perspective, and even in the couple of times you did shift to another character, I felt like it was justified. That's a surprisingly difficult thing to do well. Here, not so much. The last scene as well. It needs to be in Sunset's point of view for the letter, so don't start in Sonata's head. Have Sunset interpret Sonata's actions.

>well-fed//

In this instance, you don't need the hyphen.

You have a nice, cute little story going here, and while it's certainly a plot that's been done plenty of times, the journey is nice. The sign-spinning angle was a great touch, and you have a good feel for Sunset's and Sonata's voices. What's wrong here is mostly cosmetic, though not necessarily quick fixes. Still, I'd like to see it spruced up so I can approve it for posting. Good luck with your revisions!Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />I&#039;ll give a shorter-form review than I normally do because it&#039;s mostly just continued instances of the same few things.<br /><br />The sentence structure get a little repetitive at the beginning. Your first two speaking tags have a participle tacked on, and soon after, there&#039;s an absolute phrase, which is another participle structure. You don&#039;t continue to be repetitive like this, so just clean up that first impression.<br /><br />Look how many times you use direct address in this first conversation. Then think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation.<br /><br />Hyphenating words is fine, but when there&#039;s an interruption or aside, please use a proper dash. There&#039;s a guide to dash use at the top of this thread.<br /><br />Would Sunset, being from Equestria, really wear leather, as in dead cow skins?<br /><br />There are quite a few instances of telly language. There&#039;s a discussion of show versus tell at the top of this thread, so go read that. Here, I&#039;ll just say to avoid directly naming a character&#039;s emotion or attitude in the narration except when it&#039;s a little throwaway moment that doesn&#039;t need to draw the reader into the character&#039;s situation. See how many times you use &quot;in disbelief,&quot; for example.<br /><br />Sunset&#039;s last three attributions of the first scene are all &quot;Sunset replied,&quot; plus one of Rarity&#039;s mixed in. For that matter, you use an awful lot of unusual speaking verbs. There&#039;s also a section on saidisms up top you should read.<br /><br />It&#039;s preferred to use italics only for emphasis. For the most part, you&#039;ll want to stay away from bold or all caps.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was Sonata’s turn to roll her eyes now. “Ugh, I told you why I’m here. It’s your turn now, dur!”//</span><br />Watch the repetition of referring to turns.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘o//</span><br />The elision is o&#039;, but also note that smart quotes always draw leading apostrophes backward. This turns up elsewhere in the story, too. Please turn them the right way.<br /><br />Tone down Applejack&#039;s accent. It&#039;s quite thick, to the point that it slows me down to read it. That&#039;s a bad thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I’m sorry about my van, Rainbow Dash,” Fluttershy said, apologizing//</span><br />She clearly apologized. It&#039;s redundant to say it again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I spent my morning practicing for a track meet and my stomach’s gonna implode if I don’t get some lunch soon!//</span><br />This is another thing you do intermittently. You need a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in an attempt to explain why she didn’t come to them about Sonata’s employment at Five Alarm Taco//</span><br />Don&#039;t overexplain things in the narration. If you write her body language and actions well, the reader will get this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who was somewhat furiously attacking her taco salad. She looked up from her eating at the rest of them after a few moments of the girls watching her voraciously devour her food//</span><br />Pretty redundant again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;attempting to further explain what she meant//</span><br />More overexplanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;…huh?//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s completing a sentence previously left hanging, capitalize after a leading ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still exhausting nonetheless//</span><br />Redundant<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>think</i>?//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally include ! or ? in the italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saying her peace//</span><br />The idiom is &quot;saying her piece.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata felt panic tugging at her//</span><br />I haven&#039;t really been pointing out specific examples of telly language, but this one is crucial. It&#039;s the emotional high point of the story, and now is not the time to have the narrator spoon-feed me the conclusions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Specifically, she remembered all the fun she’d been having.//</span><br />This is pretty bland. Be specific, but not necessarily wordy. What instances of fun does she remember? How did they make her feel? Again, not in a telly way. Convey that feeling through imagery and maybe what physical sensations they caused.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Adagio didn’t know who to be more angry with: Sonata, or Sunset.//</span><br />First off, read the section on head hopping, too. You&#039;d actually done a good job of keeping much of each scene in a single character&#039;s perspective, and even in the couple of times you did shift to another character, I felt like it was justified. That&#039;s a surprisingly difficult thing to do well. Here, not so much. The last scene as well. It needs to be in Sunset&#039;s point of view for the letter, so don&#039;t start in Sonata&#039;s head. Have Sunset interpret Sonata&#039;s actions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well-fed//</span><br />In this instance, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br />You have a nice, cute little story going here, and while it&#039;s certainly a plot that&#039;s been done plenty of times, the journey is nice. The sign-spinning angle was a great touch, and you have a good feel for Sunset&#039;s and Sonata&#039;s voices. What&#039;s wrong here is mostly cosmetic, though not necessarily quick fixes. Still, I&#039;d like to see it spruced up so I can approve it for posting. Good luck with your revisions!<br />

Feedback Response Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 295

>>131104

Thanks so much for the technical breakdown, these are all things I have a habit to overlook or not even consider in my writing. It's certainly nice to get real, constructive criticism for a change. I've done a fair bit of editing already and the changes are live so you can use the same story link to check them out. Let me know if I got things closer to acceptable here.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131104" onclick="return highlight('131104', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131104">&gt;&gt;131104</a><br /><br />Thanks so much for the technical breakdown, these are all things I have a habit to overlook or not even consider in my writing. It&#039;s certainly nice to get real, constructive criticism for a change. I&#039;ve done a fair bit of editing already and the changes are live so you can use the same story link to check them out. Let me know if I got things closer to acceptable here.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 296

>>131107
Well, how to proceed is up to you. As long as you're making progress, you can keep resubmitting, so you don't have to worry about strikes. If you think it's ready for another try, you can simply submit it again.

However, if you want further input from me as to whether it's ready, that'll mean I have a vested interest in the story, and I have to recuse myself from judging it when it does come back through. That'll mean that it may well take much longer to get a response (I tend to take my returning stories quickly) and another pre-reader may well have different problems with it. Your call.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131107" onclick="return highlight('131107', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131107">&gt;&gt;131107</a><br />Well, how to proceed is up to you. As long as you&#039;re making progress, you can keep resubmitting, so you don&#039;t have to worry about strikes. If you think it&#039;s ready for another try, you can simply submit it again.<br /><br />However, if you want further input from me as to whether it&#039;s ready, that&#039;ll mean I have a vested interest in the story, and I have to recuse myself from judging it when it does come back through. That&#039;ll mean that it may well take much longer to get a response (I tend to take my returning stories quickly) and another pre-reader may well have different problems with it. Your call.<br />

Feedback Response Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 297

>>131108

I've gone ahead and re-submitted. I do feel like I got a lot of things cleaned up and fleshed out some parts that certainly are better for it now. Again, I really appreciate the technical feedback and all and I'm going to try and apply all of what you went over to my future stories as well.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131108" onclick="return highlight('131108', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131108">&gt;&gt;131108</a><br /><br />I&#039;ve gone ahead and re-submitted. I do feel like I got a lot of things cleaned up and fleshed out some parts that certainly are better for it now. Again, I really appreciate the technical feedback and all and I&#039;m going to try and apply all of what you went over to my future stories as well.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 298

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>and since I’m light on funds these days//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>locally-owned//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word descriptors when the first is an -ly adverb.

>though knowing Applejack and Rainbow Dash//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>So help me//

Invective is typically set off with a comma, too.

>Sunset beamed with pride. She liked the idea of having a job, after all.//

The fact that she's beaming and the reason given for it already depicts her as proud. Saying so is not only telly but redundant.

>Sunset may have had a lot of pride in her place of employment, but Rarity could not have been any less thrilled.//

And then you tell me the same thing again. For Rarity, tell me how she acts. You're leaving it completely up to me to generate the mental picture. If you were there observing her, what would to see to make you conclude she was less than thrilled?

>‘FAT’,//

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>Rarity’s disapproving expression//

Show me how this looks.

>as she stepped up to Sunset, putting a hand on her shoulder//

Participles are something to be very careful with, as there are several traps you can fall into with them. There are actually two problems here. First, participles imply simultaneous action, yet these would happen in sequence; she couldn't put a hand on her shoulder until after she'd stepped over. Second, participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so by grammatical default, Sunset's the one putting a hand on someone's shoulder. You likely meant Rarity, but as stated, it's ambiguous.

>and if this is how you want to handle this//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Rarity arched an eyebrow in curiosity.//

As I said in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, these types of prepositional phrases are almost always superfluous. Her reaction already connotes curiosity. You don't have to have the narrator reiterate.

>I’m sure whoever it is//

Comma after this.

>Sonata Dusk” said//

Missing comma.

>curiously, noting their reactions//

Show me that he looks curious. The "show versus tell" section goes over what red flags to look for, and adverbs are another. The "noting their reactions" skips into his point of view as well, whereas you'd started the scene in Sunset's. You could just cut this, or you could phrase it as what Sunset notices him doing. Without framing it as her perception of him, it sounds more like his own perspective.

>Sonata said nervously//

Again, show me how she looks nervous. What's her body language, her facial expression? What does she do? You should get the picture by now. I'll point out a few more telly spots, but that's all.

>blue and indigo-striped//

Hyphenate all that.

>accusingly//

>in a bit of outrage//
>in disbelief//
>a bit smugly//
>seemingly at a loss//
>enthusiastically//
>a bit nervously//
>quizzically//
>excitedly//
>her voice full of hesitation//
>Dash added proudly//
>sounding annoyed// (this one's also ambiguous as to whom it describes)
>Dash replied matter-of-factly//
>Dash asked skeptically//
>in blinking disbelief//
>again in blinking disbelief//
>with a voice full of contempt//
>Aria added snarkily//
>Sunset said a bit pleadingly//
>again snarkily//
Show it. Really, watch those adverbs.

>just tried to enslave the entire school just//

Watch the word repetition.

>Sunset admitted with a groan and a palm to her forehead.//

Here's an example of it done right. You describe only what someone there could see or hear and let the reader draw the conclusion.

>after her admission//

This is redundant.

>shuddered visibly//

As opposed to shuddering invisibly? Even if that were the case, you're using Sunset's perspective, so she wouldn't know. Keep in mind who your perspective character is and be careful to keep to things she could know or sense herself.

>still not understanding Sonata’s apprehension towards the party girl//

Over-explained and fairly irrelevant. Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself here, but you could take on a deeper limited narration if you wanted. This is told from a more external and omniscient standpoint, but in a limited narration, you can have the narrator say the character's thought for her. For instance, the narrator could say something like "How could anyone find Pinkie creepy?" If you like that style, then you need to keep it fairly consistent by putting comments like this pretty evenly throughout the story.

>This was going nowhere fast.//

Along those lines, you already do it in places. Here, the narrator is taking a conversational tone and speaking Sunset's thoughts for her. You could do this more, and it'd be more effective than the places where you have the narrator over-explain things.

>Sonata’s claim gave Sunset pause for thought.//

Here's another spot where it's over-explained, but something phrased more like a thought would work better.

>trying to push the issue//

Over-explained. This could just be cut.

>her gaze scrutinizing the girl//

That's just oddly phrased. She's scrutinizing Sonata, not her gaze.

>Well… that and I really, really love tacos.//

There's a missed opportunity here. Think about how she acted about tacos in the movie. But you completely skip showing me how she acts when she says this.

>so just what would they be up to anyway//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>between the two of them//

This doesn't add anything. It can be cut.

>Sunset suddenly found herself feeling rather uneasy//

This is redundant, as her subsequent musings already get it across.

>maybe-//

Please use a proper dash.

>still fairly hesitant about the monicker//

Over-explained again. Cut this, as I'll go into in a moment… And it's "moniker."

>Sonata, however, cut her off before she could voice her opinion on the matter.//

I can already see she was cut off, so this is redundant. Furthermore, it undercuts itself. If there's an interruption, the very next thing after the speech cuts off needs to be what interrupted in, be it speech or an action. By having the narrator wedge something in between, you make it feel much less abrupt.

>sulked in her seat some//

The "some" doesn't add anything here.

>rebuking Dash a bit//

Redundant.

>or if we do//

Commas on both sides of the dependent clause.

>sounding entirely uncertain of her answer//

There's no clear perspective in the scene yet, so I can't tell who thinks this. Later on, it sounds like you settle into Fluttershy's perspective.

>and while she wanted to talk with her friends//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>continuing to try and not be seen by passersby//

Compare to the last paragraph. Much of this scene feels like it's in Fluttershy's perspective, but this is clearly from Dash.

>and you don’t gotta do anythin’ to it you don’t wanna//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>who added her approval a bit begrudgingly//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>as she tried to keep an eye out for Five Alarm Taco//

Switched to Pinkie's perspective. Fluttershy could guess at why Pinkie was doing this, but she wouldn't know explicitly, and "tried" is also a conclusion. What does she see Pinkie do that would make her characterize it as trying, i.e., Pinkie obviously hasn't found it yet?

>‘cause//

Backward apostrophe.

>the horn of her van//

We can assume it's "of her van." You don't need to say so.

>and the girls all waved to Sunset as they passed her by//

Comma for the dependent clause, and the "passed her by" sounds pretty repetitive with the "passersby" used recently.

>as she headed back towards the restaurant with her sign//

This is the third "as" clause in the last two sentences. It gets repetitive. And then you do it again in the next sentence.

>‘Of course not//

Need double quotation marks, not single.

>nodding//

Most times, you'll set off a participle with a comma.

>so it only makes sense//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Speaking of team, Rarity said someone else was startin’ with ya//

Maneuver this paragraph to the bottom of your screen, then look back up at everything on the page that's not speech. Most of it is just speaking verbs. I have no sense that they're actually doing anything while they talk.

>May I take your-//

Use a proper dash.

>Sonata pleaded, quickly putting her arms up to defend herself.//

>Sunset said, stepping between Sonata and her friends.//
>Dash said, her eyes staring daggers at Sonata.//
>Sunset said, stepping closer to the rainbow-haired athlete.//
>Pinkie asked, leaning in close to look in Sunset’s ear as if it was a way of determining such a thing.//
>Sunset told Pinkie, pushing the pink-haired girl back just a bit.//
Six consecutive speaking actions that use identical structure. Very repetitive.

>keeping an eye on the girls to make sure none of them made any sudden moves towards her//

Watch the perspective again.

>Sunset told the girls once Sonata was outside. “You girls//

You only need to mention "girls" once there.

>and I’ll meet you at your table here in a minute.//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>While AJ groused some at Dash’s smugness, Fluttershy decided to continue the discussion with Sunset.//

Over-explained again. The fact that Fluttershy talks to Sunset obviates this, and it doesn't add anything beyond that fact.

>She looked up from her eating at the rest of them after a few moments of the girls watching her//

That's pretty awkwardly phrased.

>noted//

I'm seeing that as a speaking verb an awful lot.

>which Pinkie accepted and began cleaning her face off before having something outside the window she was seated next to catch her eye//

Same, plus this shifts around so much that it loses focus.

>‘round//

Backward apostrophe.

>Fluttershy deduced from Sunset’s breakdown of things//

Very much over-explained. This is also another conversation that devolved into talking heads. In so many of the paragraphs, there's no narration besides the speaking attribution. What are these characters doing? They might as well be floating in a featureless void.

>Dash pulled her shoulder away//

Third straight paragraph to start with "Dash."

>trying to turn her around like we-//

Use a proper dash.

>to look outside as well. Once she was looking outside//

Repetitive.

>Sonata was out in front of the restaurant with the sign//

Look how repetitive the language is in this paragraph. There are two instances of "into the air," another of "through the air," two references to the music in her head, three spins, two "again"s in the same sentence.

>in an attempt to use it as a shield of some kind//

That's getting into Sonata's perspective. It's fine if it looks to the perspective character (and it's not clear who that is anymore) judges it that way, but this is framed as Sonata's motivation.

>bracing herself for whatever blast of magic might come from the six friends//

Again, this's have to be from Sonata's perspective, since nobody else would think this was about to happen. If you want, you can gently slide into Sonata's perspective as the girls go outside, but you have to keep it there. The previous paragraph was in Sunset's perspective, for comparison. It's jarring to jump around so much.

>so I started fooling around with the sign//

Comma for the dependent clause. And note the two instances of "just" in the sentence.

>her own admiration for Sonata’s sign spinning evident//

If it's so evident, why don't I get to see it?

>Sunset asked, keeping herself in front of the pack of girls once they arrived//

>Dash said, stepping up past Sunset//
>Dash said, making a few moves of her own in the opposite direction of Sonata//
>Pinkie also added, bouncing up close to Sonata//
>Rarity said, trying to inject some calm into the situation//
>Sonata asked, still sounding wary//
>Sonata replied, finally lowering the sign//
>Sunset asked, trying to press the issue//
These are all within the same screenful. See how incredibly repetitive they are in structure?

>turning her attention back to her ponytailed co-worker//

You're using such descriptors for characters a bit much, and this one's unnecessary, as Sunset addresses her in the dialogue, removing any ambiguity over whom she might be talking to.

>Sonata quickly sat up and began partaking of the food.//

Awkwardly phrased and bland. This scene appears to be in Sonata's perspective. So how does this make her feel? She's earning her pay, someone likes her enough to bring her food, and it's something she loves to eat. Surely she has a reaction to it.

>Sonata said after washing down some food with the water//

Along the same vein, this sounds really drab.

>Sunset admits//

Why the switch to present tense?

>Sunset admitted//

Same speaking verb you used for her last line.

>- even the pink one -//

>maybe-//
Proper dashes, please.

>Sonata cut her thoughts short//

That's already evident from the punctuation. And going back to a comment I left previously, once the dialogue cuts off, the very next thing needs to be what interrupted it.

>and as soon as she caught sight of who had entered//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Sunset quickly got up from her seat and turned to look at the two as well.//

This is also very bland. There's zero indication of how she feels about seeing the other two. She stands and looks at them. For all I know, she doesn't recognize them, or might be looking at the furniture delivery van outside.

>as she looked back at Sonata//

You use "look" an awful lot in this story. It's a very boring word. It's only a what, not a how. Try to pick verbs that connote the how as well, like glare, peer, scowl, etc. Go back through and see if you can find better phrasings.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>When she realized all of that//

The fact that she's even thinking it makes this obvious. Cut it.

>curly-haired//

>curly hair//
Redundant. These both appear in the same sentence.

>chuckling a bit as Sonata came to the same conclusion she herself had//

You'd been in Sonata's perspective, but now you're switching to Sunset.

>“thumbs up”,//

Comma inside the quotes.

>found in places you never thought you might find//

Watch the repetition of "find."

The good news: There have definitely been some improvements since last time. The bad: I'm surprised at some of the things that didn't change. I pointed out the backward apostrophe and said that I'd found others in the story. You only changed the one I specifically gave as an example. I asked you to change the hyphens you were using for interruptions and asides to dashes. All the hyphens are still there. If I was in a bad mood, I might have given you a flat rejection. Instead, I cut the generalities and pointed out more specific things this time. I expect to see a commensurate improvement next time. If there are things you don't understand or are unsure about, please ask.

The biggest issues here are the telly language and the perspective.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and since I’m light on funds these days//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;locally-owned//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to hyphenate two-word descriptors when the first is an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;though knowing Applejack and Rainbow Dash//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So help me//</span><br />Invective is typically set off with a comma, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset beamed with pride. She liked the idea of having a job, after all.//</span><br />The fact that she&#039;s beaming and the reason given for it already depicts her as proud. Saying so is not only telly but redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset may have had a lot of pride in her place of employment, but Rarity could not have been any less thrilled.//</span><br />And then you tell me the same thing again. For Rarity, tell me how she acts. You&#039;re leaving it completely up to me to generate the mental picture. If you were there observing her, what would to see to make you conclude she was less than thrilled?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘FAT’,//</span><br />Comma goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity’s disapproving expression//</span><br />Show me how this looks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she stepped up to Sunset, putting a hand on her shoulder//</span><br />Participles are something to be very careful with, as there are several traps you can fall into with them. There are actually two problems here. First, participles imply simultaneous action, yet these would happen in sequence; she couldn&#039;t put a hand on her shoulder until after she&#039;d stepped over. Second, participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so by grammatical default, Sunset&#039;s the one putting a hand on someone&#039;s shoulder. You likely meant Rarity, but as stated, it&#039;s ambiguous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if this is how you want to handle this//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity arched an eyebrow in curiosity.//</span><br />As I said in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, these types of prepositional phrases are almost always superfluous. Her reaction already connotes curiosity. You don&#039;t have to have the narrator reiterate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sure whoever it is//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata Dusk” said//</span><br />Missing comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;curiously, noting their reactions//</span><br />Show me that he looks curious. The &quot;show versus tell&quot; section goes over what red flags to look for, and adverbs are another. The &quot;noting their reactions&quot; skips into his point of view as well, whereas you&#039;d started the scene in Sunset&#039;s. You could just cut this, or you could phrase it as what Sunset notices him doing. Without framing it as her perception of him, it sounds more like his own perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata said nervously//</span><br />Again, show me how she looks nervous. What&#039;s her body language, her facial expression? What does she do? You should get the picture by now. I&#039;ll point out a few more telly spots, but that&#039;s all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blue and indigo-striped//</span><br />Hyphenate all that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;accusingly//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in a bit of outrage//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in disbelief//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bit smugly//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;seemingly at a loss//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;enthusiastically//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a bit nervously//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quizzically//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;excitedly//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her voice full of hesitation//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash added proudly//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sounding annoyed// (this one&#039;s also ambiguous as to whom it describes)</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash replied matter-of-factly//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash asked skeptically//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in blinking disbelief//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;again in blinking disbelief//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a voice full of contempt//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Aria added snarkily//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset said a bit pleadingly//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;again snarkily//</span><br />Show it. Really, watch those adverbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just tried to enslave the entire school just//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset admitted with a groan and a palm to her forehead.//</span><br />Here&#039;s an example of it done right. You describe only what someone there could see or hear and let the reader draw the conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after her admission//</span><br />This is redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shuddered visibly//</span><br />As opposed to shuddering invisibly? Even if that were the case, you&#039;re using Sunset&#039;s perspective, so she wouldn&#039;t know. Keep in mind who your perspective character is and be careful to keep to things she could know or sense herself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still not understanding Sonata’s apprehension towards the party girl//</span><br />Over-explained and fairly irrelevant. Maybe I&#039;m getting ahead of myself here, but you could take on a deeper limited narration if you wanted. This is told from a more external and omniscient standpoint, but in a limited narration, you can have the narrator say the character&#039;s thought for her. For instance, the narrator could say something like &quot;How could <i>anyone</i> find Pinkie creepy?&quot; If you like that style, then you need to keep it fairly consistent by putting comments like this pretty evenly throughout the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This was going nowhere fast.//</span><br />Along those lines, you already do it in places. Here, the narrator is taking a conversational tone and speaking Sunset&#039;s thoughts for her. You could do this more, and it&#039;d be more effective than the places where you have the narrator over-explain things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata’s claim gave Sunset pause for thought.//</span><br />Here&#039;s another spot where it&#039;s over-explained, but something phrased more like a thought would work better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trying to push the issue//</span><br />Over-explained. This could just be cut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her gaze scrutinizing the girl//</span><br />That&#039;s just oddly phrased. She&#039;s scrutinizing Sonata, not her gaze.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well… that and I really, <i>really</i> love tacos.//</span><br />There&#039;s a missed opportunity here. Think about how she acted about tacos in the movie. But you completely skip showing me how she acts when she says this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so just what would they be up to anyway//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;between the two of them//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t add anything. It can be cut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset suddenly found herself feeling rather uneasy//</span><br />This is redundant, as her subsequent musings already get it across.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;maybe-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still fairly hesitant about the monicker//</span><br />Over-explained again. Cut this, as I&#039;ll go into in a moment… And it&#039;s &quot;moniker.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata, however, cut her off before she could voice her opinion on the matter.//</span><br />I can already see she was cut off, so this is redundant. Furthermore, it undercuts itself. If there&#039;s an interruption, the very next thing after the speech cuts off needs to be what interrupted in, be it speech or an action. By having the narrator wedge something in between, you make it feel much less abrupt.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sulked in her seat some//</span><br />The &quot;some&quot; doesn&#039;t add anything here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rebuking Dash a bit//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or if we do//</span><br />Commas on both sides of the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sounding entirely uncertain of her answer//</span><br />There&#039;s no clear perspective in the scene yet, so I can&#039;t tell who thinks this. Later on, it sounds like you settle into Fluttershy&#039;s perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and while she wanted to talk with her friends//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;continuing to try and not be seen by passersby//</span><br />Compare to the last paragraph. Much of this scene feels like it&#039;s in Fluttershy&#039;s perspective, but this is clearly from Dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and you don’t gotta do anythin’ to it you don’t wanna//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who added her approval a bit begrudgingly//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she tried to keep an eye out for Five Alarm Taco//</span><br />Switched to Pinkie&#039;s perspective. Fluttershy could guess at why Pinkie was doing this, but she wouldn&#039;t know explicitly, and &quot;tried&quot; is also a conclusion. What does she see Pinkie do that would make her characterize it as trying, i.e., Pinkie obviously hasn&#039;t found it yet?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the horn of her van//</span><br />We can assume it&#039;s &quot;of her van.&quot; You don&#039;t need to say so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the girls all waved to Sunset as they passed her by//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause, and the &quot;passed her by&quot; sounds pretty repetitive with the &quot;passersby&quot; used recently.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she headed back towards the restaurant with her sign//</span><br />This is the third &quot;as&quot; clause in the last two sentences. It gets repetitive. And then you do it again in the next sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Of course not//</span><br />Need double quotation marks, not single.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nodding//</span><br />Most times, you&#039;ll set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so it only makes sense//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Speaking of team, Rarity said someone else was startin’ with ya//</span><br />Maneuver this paragraph to the bottom of your screen, then look back up at everything on the page that&#039;s not speech. Most of it is just speaking verbs. I have no sense that they&#039;re actually doing anything while they talk.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;May I take your-//</span><br />Use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata pleaded, quickly putting her arms up to defend herself.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset said, stepping between Sonata and her friends.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash said, her eyes staring daggers at Sonata.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset said, stepping closer to the rainbow-haired athlete.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie asked, leaning in close to look in Sunset’s ear as if it was a way of determining such a thing.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset told Pinkie, pushing the pink-haired girl back just a bit.//</span><br />Six consecutive speaking actions that use identical structure. Very repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;keeping an eye on the girls to make sure none of them made any sudden moves towards her//</span><br />Watch the perspective again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset told the girls once Sonata was outside. “You girls//</span><br />You only need to mention &quot;girls&quot; once there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and I’ll meet you at your table here in a minute.//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;While AJ groused some at Dash’s smugness, Fluttershy decided to continue the discussion with Sunset.//</span><br />Over-explained again. The fact that Fluttershy talks to Sunset obviates this, and it doesn&#039;t add anything beyond that fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked up from her eating at the rest of them after a few moments of the girls watching her//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;noted//</span><br />I&#039;m seeing that as a speaking verb an awful lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which Pinkie accepted and began cleaning her face off before having something outside the window she was seated next to catch her eye//</span><br />Same, plus this shifts around so much that it loses focus.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘round//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy deduced from Sunset’s breakdown of things//</span><br />Very much over-explained. This is also another conversation that devolved into talking heads. In so many of the paragraphs, there&#039;s no narration besides the speaking attribution. What are these characters doing? They might as well be floating in a featureless void.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash pulled her shoulder away//</span><br />Third straight paragraph to start with &quot;Dash.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trying to turn her around like we-//</span><br />Use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to look outside as well. Once she was looking outside//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata was out in front of the restaurant with the sign//</span><br />Look how repetitive the language is in this paragraph. There are two instances of &quot;into the air,&quot; another of &quot;through the air,&quot; two references to the music in her head, three spins, two &quot;again&quot;s in the same sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in an attempt to use it as a shield of some kind//</span><br />That&#039;s getting into Sonata&#039;s perspective. It&#039;s fine if it looks to the perspective character (and it&#039;s not clear who that is anymore) judges it that way, but this is framed as Sonata&#039;s motivation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bracing herself for whatever blast of magic might come from the six friends//</span><br />Again, this&#039;s have to be from Sonata&#039;s perspective, since nobody else would think this was about to happen. If you want, you can gently slide into Sonata&#039;s perspective as the girls go outside, but you have to keep it there. The previous paragraph was in Sunset&#039;s perspective, for comparison. It&#039;s jarring to jump around so much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so I started fooling around with the sign//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause. And note the two instances of &quot;just&quot; in the sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her own admiration for Sonata’s sign spinning evident//</span><br />If it&#039;s so evident, why don&#039;t I get to see it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset asked, keeping herself in front of the pack of girls once they arrived//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash said, stepping up past Sunset//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash said, making a few moves of her own in the opposite direction of Sonata//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie also added, bouncing up close to Sonata//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity said, trying to inject some calm into the situation//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata asked, still sounding wary//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata replied, finally lowering the sign//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset asked, trying to press the issue//</span><br />These are all within the same screenful. See how incredibly repetitive they are in structure?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;turning her attention back to her ponytailed co-worker//</span><br />You&#039;re using such descriptors for characters a bit much, and this one&#039;s unnecessary, as Sunset addresses her in the dialogue, removing any ambiguity over whom she might be talking to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata quickly sat up and began partaking of the food.//</span><br />Awkwardly phrased and bland. This scene appears to be in Sonata&#039;s perspective. So how does this make her feel? She&#039;s earning her pay, someone likes her enough to bring her food, and it&#039;s something she loves to eat. Surely she has a reaction to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata said after washing down some food with the water//</span><br />Along the same vein, this sounds really drab.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset admits//</span><br />Why the switch to present tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset admitted//</span><br />Same speaking verb you used for her last line.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- even the pink one -//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;maybe-//</span><br />Proper dashes, please.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sonata cut her thoughts short//</span><br />That&#039;s already evident from the punctuation. And going back to a comment I left previously, once the dialogue cuts off, the very next thing needs to be what interrupted it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and as soon as she caught sight of who had entered//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sunset quickly got up from her seat and turned to look at the two as well.//</span><br />This is also very bland. There&#039;s zero indication of how she feels about seeing the other two. She stands and looks at them. For all I know, she doesn&#039;t recognize them, or might be looking at the furniture delivery van outside.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she looked back at Sonata//</span><br />You use &quot;look&quot; an awful lot in this story. It&#039;s a very boring word. It&#039;s only a what, not a how. Try to pick verbs that connote the how as well, like glare, peer, scowl, etc. Go back through and see if you can find better phrasings.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When she realized all of that//</span><br />The fact that she&#039;s even thinking it makes this obvious. Cut it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;curly-haired//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;curly hair//</span><br />Redundant. These both appear in the same sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;chuckling a bit as Sonata came to the same conclusion she herself had//</span><br />You&#039;d been in Sonata&#039;s perspective, but now you&#039;re switching to Sunset.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“thumbs up”,//</span><br />Comma inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;found in places you never thought you might find//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;find.&quot;<br /><br />The good news: There have definitely been some improvements since last time. The bad: I&#039;m surprised at some of the things that didn&#039;t change. I pointed out the backward apostrophe and said that I&#039;d found others in the story. You only changed the one I specifically gave as an example. I asked you to change the hyphens you were using for interruptions and asides to dashes. All the hyphens are still there. If I was in a bad mood, I might have given you a flat rejection. Instead, I cut the generalities and pointed out more specific things this time. I expect to see a commensurate improvement next time. If there are things you don&#039;t understand or are unsure about, please ask.<br /><br />The biggest issues here are the telly language and the perspective.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 299

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>letting her thoughts roam about//

It's ambiguous whom this describes. Grammatically speaking, Luna is presumed, but you likely meant Celestia.

>Leaves of varying fall colors fell down around them, covering the path.//

Note that you're already falling into somewhat of a repetitive sentence structure. Three of the four so far have a participle, and they all occur at the same point in their sentences, too. The beginning of a story really needs to shine. It's a reader's first impression and one of the parts they'll remember the best.

>judgement//

judgment

>She hated days like those, and today had been one of those days.//

There must be a more elegant way of phrasing this. It recycles so many words that it feels repetitive, and not deliberately so, even though the meaning isn't repetitive.

>which meant that she wouldn’t have to deal with other ponies’ problems for a couple of weeks//

It's odd that you're directly attributing this to a Thursday when you've already been over this material without mentioning that.

>sis//

When used as a term of address, it would be capitalized. However, she's always used the full "sister," in canon.

>She looked at Shining Armor expecting a hug from him//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>wondering what could have happened to have gotten her niece in such a state//

This is pretty self-evident from the fact that she asked in the first place. No need to over-explain things.

>She felt a lone tear slip from her eye//

This is one of the most cliched things you could have done.

>old long-lost feelings of hurt and depression came to the surface//

Why shut me out? The whole point of the story is to get the reader to identify with Celestia's situation, but you completely gloss over what importance it holds. Yeah, save some for later, if you don't want to lay out the whole conflict so soon, but give me some examples of these feelings. Times she felt a gnawing in her gut when she'd see a mare leading three foals along the street, how she feared she might be subconsciously usurping a motherhood role when she took Twilight on as a student, when she was young and saw the way her mother looked at her, and she now knows she'll never get to be on the other side. You need to give this the gravity it deserves.

>a worried look upon her face//

Go ahead and read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. It looks like it's going to be a continuing issue. Put me as a witness in the room. What would I note about her appearance and actions that would lead me to think she was worried? Just give me the raw physical evidence and let me draw the conclusion.

>“Um… is she going to be okay?”//

I think you're okay, as it's common enough to do this, but I at least want you to understand the potential issue. Celestia has held the perspective so far, but she's left, so she can't witness this. There wasn't a smooth transition to another character's perspective, and it would seem odd to do so anyway, since right after the scene break, you go right back to Celestia. But like I said, it's common enough to do a quick transfer right at the end of a scene like this, so you're probably fine here.

>“I don’t know…”//

Now, this is melodramatic. Surely Celestia has encountered close friends and relatives having kids before. What about when Blueblood was born? Or Cadance herself? What about this time makes Luna think it'll be any worse than before?

>cherry blossom trees//

They're just cherry trees. Maybe they have blossoms on them but that's not what the tree is called.

>She was laying//

Lay/lie confusion.

>this place//

>this as a place//
>to this place//
>in this place//
>this place//
>this place//
I'm only six paragraphs into the second scene, and I have all this already. See how it gets bogged down by repetition?

>lake’s perfect, undisturbed surface, creating tiny ripples that marred the lake’s mirror-like surface//

More repetition: two instances of "lake's… surface."

>for everypony’s enjoyment//

I thought she was the only one who came here. Might need to differentiate these trees from ones in general.

>taken its toll on her body, taking//

Repetition. Honestly, if you made the second one another "taken," it'd both strike a conversational tone and make the repetition feel deliberate.

>tried to mate with a few of her guards//

This could have some really disturbing implications. Did she coerce them? Did they know why she was doing this?

>She had made those aware of her indiscretions swear to her that they would never speak of what she did again under punishment of life in prison//

That doesn't seem like her. Even if she'd done so initially in a fit of despair, she'd surely relent later on. If they'd tried to blackmail her, that's one thing, but punishing them for something that was her fault?

>A sole tear//

Again?

So was she already barren by the time she decided she wanted kids and just didn't know it? She's been around a long time; I'm wondering why the urge to have children came about when it did. It's not like she never had the opportunity.

>and demoted him//

That hardly seems fair. What he did had no reflection on his ability to do his job, unless there's something against fraternizing within the chain of command; if so, she's guilty of the same thing.

>Letting her gaze flick back and forth across the lake, her eyes//

Dangling participle. Surely she's the one letting her gaze flick back and forth, but this specifically says that her eyes let her gaze do so.

>; alone in this world.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it. A colon would work.

>making her feel happy for the swan//

Redundant.

>the most predominant thing she felt was betrayal//

Don't just tell me the emotion. Let me see the effect it has on her and deduce it for myself.

>soft hoofsteps//

Already used "soft" in the paragraph.

>Luna said softly//

And more soft…

>sister//

Again capitalize it as a term of address.

>freshly-sharpened//

You don't need to hyphenate descriptive phrases when they're two words long and start with an -ly adverb.

>for the few hundred years that followed your banishment//

Why not before that?

>“that//

Capitalization

>Celestia trailed off//

That's the kind of thing you don't need to narrate when the punctuation already indicates it.

>She was cut off//

Same deal.

>Luna opened her mouth to say that she had already gotten over it//

So why are you going into Luna's perspective now?

>A single tear//

Stop that.

>So many emotions swirled around inside her//

Don't I get to see any of them? This is pretty much the emotional crux of the story, and you're skimping on what gives it punch.

>sis//

Capitalize.

That was kind of a rushed ending. It basically said that misery loves company, but it didn't go much into how Celestia felt or whether she was heading toward finding some peace on the matter.

The major mechanical issue was repetition, both in word choice and structure, as in the abundance of participial phrases. On the stylistic side, it used a lot of telly language instead of letting the reader delve into the story and reach the conclusions himself. There are times it gets over-explained, too, which is a similar thing. Give the reader enough space to figure things out on his own, and he will. Also keep in mind that in very emotional situations, less is often more. Melodrama is often transparent and inauthentic. Having a character overreact just cheapens the moment.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;letting her thoughts roam about//</span><br />It&#039;s ambiguous whom this describes. Grammatically speaking, Luna is presumed, but you likely meant Celestia.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Leaves of varying fall colors fell down around them, covering the path.//</span><br />Note that you&#039;re already falling into somewhat of a repetitive sentence structure. Three of the four so far have a participle, and they all occur at the same point in their sentences, too. The beginning of a story really needs to shine. It&#039;s a reader&#039;s first impression and one of the parts they&#039;ll remember the best.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;judgement//</span><br />judgment<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She hated days like those, and today had been one of those days.//</span><br />There must be a more elegant way of phrasing this. It recycles so many words that it feels repetitive, and not deliberately so, even though the meaning isn&#039;t repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which meant that she wouldn’t have to deal with other ponies’ problems for a couple of weeks//</span><br />It&#039;s odd that you&#039;re directly attributing this to a Thursday when you&#039;ve already been over this material without mentioning that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />When used as a term of address, it would be capitalized. However, she&#039;s always used the full &quot;sister,&quot; in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked at Shining Armor expecting a hug from him//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wondering what could have happened to have gotten her niece in such a state//</span><br />This is pretty self-evident from the fact that she asked in the first place. No need to over-explain things.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt a lone tear slip from her eye//</span><br />This is one of the most cliched things you could have done.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;old long-lost feelings of hurt and depression came to the surface//</span><br />Why shut me out? The whole point of the story is to get the reader to identify with Celestia&#039;s situation, but you completely gloss over what importance it holds. Yeah, save some for later, if you don&#039;t want to lay out the whole conflict so soon, but give me some examples of these feelings. Times she felt a gnawing in her gut when she&#039;d see a mare leading three foals along the street, how she feared she might be subconsciously usurping a motherhood role when she took Twilight on as a student, when she was young and saw the way her mother looked at her, and she now knows she&#039;ll never get to be on the other side. You need to give this the gravity it deserves.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a worried look upon her face//</span><br />Go ahead and read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread. It looks like it&#039;s going to be a continuing issue. Put me as a witness in the room. What would I note about her appearance and actions that would lead me to think she was worried? Just give me the raw physical evidence and let me draw the conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Um… is she going to be okay?”//</span><br />I think you&#039;re okay, as it&#039;s common enough to do this, but I at least want you to understand the potential issue. Celestia has held the perspective so far, but she&#039;s left, so she can&#039;t witness this. There wasn&#039;t a smooth transition to another character&#039;s perspective, and it would seem odd to do so anyway, since right after the scene break, you go right back to Celestia. But like I said, it&#039;s common enough to do a quick transfer right at the end of a scene like this, so you&#039;re probably fine here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I don’t know…”//</span><br />Now, this is melodramatic. Surely Celestia has encountered close friends and relatives having kids before. What about when Blueblood was born? Or Cadance herself? What about this time makes Luna think it&#039;ll be any worse than before?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cherry blossom trees//</span><br />They&#039;re just cherry trees. Maybe they have blossoms on them but that&#039;s not what the tree is called.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was laying//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this place//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this as a place//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to this place//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in this place//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this place//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this place//</span><br />I&#039;m only six paragraphs into the second scene, and I have all this already. See how it gets bogged down by repetition?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lake’s perfect, undisturbed surface, creating tiny ripples that marred the lake’s mirror-like surface//</span><br />More repetition: two instances of &quot;lake&#039;s… surface.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for everypony’s enjoyment//</span><br />I thought she was the only one who came here. Might need to differentiate these trees from ones in general.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taken its toll on her body, taking//</span><br />Repetition. Honestly, if you made the second one another &quot;taken,&quot; it&#039;d both strike a conversational tone and make the repetition feel deliberate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tried to mate with a few of her guards//</span><br />This could have some really disturbing implications. Did she coerce them? Did they know why she was doing this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had made those aware of her indiscretions swear to her that they would never speak of what she did again under punishment of life in prison//</span><br />That doesn&#039;t seem like her. Even if she&#039;d done so initially in a fit of despair, she&#039;d surely relent later on. If they&#039;d tried to blackmail her, that&#039;s one thing, but punishing them for something that was her fault?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A sole tear//</span><br />Again?<br /><br />So was she already barren by the time she decided she wanted kids and just didn&#039;t know it? She&#039;s been around a long time; I&#039;m wondering why the urge to have children came about when it did. It&#039;s not like she never had the opportunity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and demoted him//</span><br />That hardly seems fair. What he did had no reflection on his ability to do his job, unless there&#039;s something against fraternizing within the chain of command; if so, she&#039;s guilty of the same thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Letting her gaze flick back and forth across the lake, her eyes//</span><br />Dangling participle. Surely she&#039;s the one letting her gaze flick back and forth, but this specifically says that her eyes let her gaze do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;; alone in this world.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it. A colon would work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;making her feel happy for the swan//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the most predominant thing she felt was betrayal//</span><br />Don&#039;t just tell me the emotion. Let me see the effect it has on her and deduce it for myself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;soft hoofsteps//</span><br />Already used &quot;soft&quot; in the paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna said softly//</span><br />And more soft…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sister//</span><br />Again capitalize it as a term of address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;freshly-sharpened//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to hyphenate descriptive phrases when they&#039;re two words long and start with an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for the few hundred years that followed your banishment//</span><br />Why not before that?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“that//</span><br />Capitalization<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia trailed off//</span><br />That&#039;s the kind of thing you don&#039;t need to narrate when the punctuation already indicates it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was cut off//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna opened her mouth to say that she had already gotten over it//</span><br />So why are you going into Luna&#039;s perspective now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A single tear//</span><br />Stop that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So many emotions swirled around inside her//</span><br />Don&#039;t I get to see any of them? This is pretty much the emotional crux of the story, and you&#039;re skimping on what gives it punch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />Capitalize.<br /><br />That was kind of a rushed ending. It basically said that misery loves company, but it didn&#039;t go much into how Celestia felt or whether she was heading toward finding some peace on the matter.<br /><br />The major mechanical issue was repetition, both in word choice and structure, as in the abundance of participial phrases. On the stylistic side, it used a lot of telly language instead of letting the reader delve into the story and reach the conclusions himself. There are times it gets over-explained, too, which is a similar thing. Give the reader enough space to figure things out on his own, and he will. Also keep in mind that in very emotional situations, less is often more. Melodrama is often transparent and inauthentic. Having a character overreact just cheapens the moment.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 300

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Her hair wisped around her face and her coat rippled in a gentle wind.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Smoke rose from the chimney of the cozy cottage, indicating its other inhabitant was still home.//

That doesn't necessarily follow, unless she knows his routine so well that he wouldn't leave an unattended fire, but she doesn'y say so.

>containing fresh cut grass, greens from the garden, and extra water//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>rolling hills in the distance covered in oranges and reds by the forest of broad leaved trees growing on them//

The "in the distance" here separates a descriptor from what it modifies, and it comes off oddly.

>Lunch came on a blanket in the grass as time crawled by//

This is kind of coming out of left field. If you'd outright stated that's what she was doing, implied it through some of the things she carried, or at least hinted that I was getting an incomplete picture of her so far, that'd be one thing, but you're making me revise my mental picture of the situation.

>paper-wrapped food//

Didn't she eat the food? Maybe say that these are just the wrappings or that they're paper-wrapped leftovers.

>she tied the bag shut, and turned to face the hill.//

Opposite issue. This is all one clause, so you don't need a comma.

>surprised she hadn’t glimpsed//

This is located far enough from what it modifies that it causes a hiccup. It sounds like the foreleg is doing this.

>surprised she hadn’t glimpsed//

Fairly telly, and the glare already connotes disapproval.

>Don’t be so surprised//

A little repetitive, as you already described Twilight as such.

>“Shouldn’t you have put it out?”//

There you go. But Twilight seems awful sure that this is against the norm. Might want to drive the point home earlier that since Twilight sees the smoke, she thinks there's no chance of Chroma being out here.

>Croma//

Typo.

>hurt in her eyes//

Don't be so blunt. Let me draw the conclusions.

>Twilight felt a stab of guilt.//

Same deal.

>she grit her teeth//

gritted

>Aren’t I your friend.//

That's a question, right?

>leaf strewn//

Hyphenate the compound modifier.

>“How do I know I won’t understand if you won’t explain it to me?” Twilight asked.//

At this point, I'm noticing an awful lot of places where the only actions are speaking verbs or occasional large-scale actions, but not much in the way of body language that would indicate mood.

>I want to know Chroma//

Comma for direct address.

>This isn’t friendship, Twilight realized.//

This is rubbing me wrong in a couple of ways. First, Twilight has zero reaction to the realization. Second, it's so unsubtle.

>stetson//

That's a proper noun.

>Twilight crested the top of the hill, ignoring Chroma.//

Another oddly placed modifier. It sounds like the hill is ignoring her.

>The ground beneath her suddenly smeared.//

I think you can do without the "suddenly." If the narration is written well, the suddenness will come through without your having to say so. But wouldn't the events of this paragraph be startling? Yet Twilight doesn't react to it at all. The narrator, who's been limited in her perspective, presents this very factually.

>All you have to do is believe me and you can be happy forever.//

Comma between the clauses.

>She realized she’d never felt the slightest discomfort in Chroma’s.//

In Chroma's what?

>floorboards boards//

Extraneous word.

>She picked up a bottle of turpentine.//

You're really getting into a rut of sentence structure here. Aside from the single instance of speech, there's a block of about thirty sentences here where only one starts with something other than the subject, and many are about the same length, too.

>spec//

Typo.

>pain and horror in her eyes//

Show me.

>She’d taken them to this old, run-down cottage; her childhood home.//

A little ambiguous as to whom this describes. My first impression was Twilight, since she was the character most recently named, but then I figured out you meant Chroma.

>Why should I!//

It's a question.

>“Why do ponies always need some conflict, some goal? Why can’t they be satisfied with what they have, without demanding that there be always be something more?”//

Her meaning is true enough, but the way she expresses it just feels more scripted than authentic. It's a spontaneous conversation, and it should feel less like prepared speech.

That's a rather abrupt end. It's fine that we don't get a well-defined resolution, but this just feels cut off before it took any meaningful direction. Chroma seems suddenly apologetic, which is pretty convenient, but at least it indicates what direction the open ending leads toward. The key to an open ending, though, is attaching emotional consequences to the different interpretations. If there's an easily viable one that's anticlimactic, it disarms them all, to a degree. Here, Chroma could just give in because she has no choice, but without learning anything. And Twilight is pretty stoic about it, so she might let it go at that. If we see one or both of them in emotional turmoil over what to choose, then it charges either path.

And Twilight's stoicism definitely limited the story's emotional impact. By not delving into the characters' emotions, it plays more like an academic matter. And given that the narration is limited, it's even more curious that Twilight shows little to no feeling about any of these events.

That said, this was a good idea for a story, and it definitely carries a creepy vibe as I start to figure out what's happening. Charge it up with the emotional subtext, and you'll have something here.

The only other thing I'd say is that it'll be hard to sell this as adventure. They're typically fairly long stories that cover a large time period, multiple diverse locations, and an extended cast. This story is a little tough to classify, but I'd tend to call it normal, maybe dark.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her hair wisped around her face and her coat rippled in a gentle wind.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Smoke rose from the chimney of the cozy cottage, indicating its other inhabitant was still home.//</span><br />That doesn&#039;t necessarily follow, unless she knows his routine so well that he wouldn&#039;t leave an unattended fire, but she doesn&#039;y say so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;containing fresh cut grass, greens from the garden, and extra water//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rolling hills in the distance covered in oranges and reds by the forest of broad leaved trees growing on them//</span><br />The &quot;in the distance&quot; here separates a descriptor from what it modifies, and it comes off oddly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lunch came on a blanket in the grass as time crawled by//</span><br />This is kind of coming out of left field. If you&#039;d outright stated that&#039;s what she was doing, implied it through some of the things she carried, or at least hinted that I was getting an incomplete picture of her so far, that&#039;d be one thing, but you&#039;re making me revise my mental picture of the situation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;paper-wrapped food//</span><br />Didn&#039;t she eat the food? Maybe say that these are just the wrappings or that they&#039;re paper-wrapped leftovers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she tied the bag shut, and turned to face the hill.//</span><br />Opposite issue. This is all one clause, so you don&#039;t need a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;surprised she hadn’t glimpsed//</span><br />This is located far enough from what it modifies that it causes a hiccup. It sounds like the foreleg is doing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;surprised she hadn’t glimpsed//</span><br />Fairly telly, and the glare already connotes disapproval.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t be so surprised//</span><br />A little repetitive, as you already described Twilight as such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Shouldn’t you have put it out?”//</span><br />There you go. But Twilight seems awful sure that this is against the norm. Might want to drive the point home earlier that since Twilight sees the smoke, she thinks there&#039;s no chance of Chroma being out here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Croma//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hurt in her eyes//</span><br />Don&#039;t be so blunt. Let me draw the conclusions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight felt a stab of guilt.//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she grit her teeth//</span><br />gritted<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Aren’t I your friend.//</span><br />That&#039;s a question, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaf strewn//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“How do I know I won’t understand if you won’t explain it to me?” Twilight asked.//</span><br />At this point, I&#039;m noticing an awful lot of places where the only actions are speaking verbs or occasional large-scale actions, but not much in the way of body language that would indicate mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I want to <i>know</i> Chroma//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This isn’t friendship, Twilight realized.//</span><br />This is rubbing me wrong in a couple of ways. First, Twilight has zero reaction to the realization. Second, it&#039;s so unsubtle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stetson//</span><br />That&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight crested the top of the hill, ignoring Chroma.//</span><br />Another oddly placed modifier. It sounds like the hill is ignoring her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The ground beneath her suddenly smeared.//</span><br />I think you can do without the &quot;suddenly.&quot; If the narration is written well, the suddenness will come through without your having to say so. But wouldn&#039;t the events of this paragraph be startling? Yet Twilight doesn&#039;t react to it at all. The narrator, who&#039;s been limited in her perspective, presents this very factually.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All you have to do is believe me and you can be happy forever.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She realized she’d never felt the slightest discomfort in Chroma’s.//</span><br />In Chroma&#039;s what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;floorboards boards//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She picked up a bottle of turpentine.//</span><br />You&#039;re really getting into a rut of sentence structure here. Aside from the single instance of speech, there&#039;s a block of about thirty sentences here where only one starts with something other than the subject, and many are about the same length, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spec//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pain and horror in her eyes//</span><br />Show me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She’d taken them to this old, run-down cottage; her childhood home.//</span><br />A little ambiguous as to whom this describes. My first impression was Twilight, since she was the character most recently named, but then I figured out you meant Chroma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why should I!//</span><br />It&#039;s a question.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Why do ponies always need some conflict, some goal? Why can’t they be satisfied with what they have, without demanding that there be always be something more?”//</span><br />Her meaning is true enough, but the way she expresses it just feels more scripted than authentic. It&#039;s a spontaneous conversation, and it should feel less like prepared speech.<br /><br />That&#039;s a rather abrupt end. It&#039;s fine that we don&#039;t get a well-defined resolution, but this just feels cut off before it took any meaningful direction. Chroma seems suddenly apologetic, which is pretty convenient, but at least it indicates what direction the open ending leads toward. The key to an open ending, though, is attaching emotional consequences to the different interpretations. If there&#039;s an easily viable one that&#039;s anticlimactic, it disarms them all, to a degree. Here, Chroma could just give in because she has no choice, but without learning anything. And Twilight is pretty stoic about it, so she might let it go at that. If we see one or both of them in emotional turmoil over what to choose, then it charges either path.<br /><br />And Twilight&#039;s stoicism definitely limited the story&#039;s emotional impact. By not delving into the characters&#039; emotions, it plays more like an academic matter. And given that the narration is limited, it&#039;s even more curious that Twilight shows little to no feeling about any of these events.<br /><br />That said, this was a good idea for a story, and it definitely carries a creepy vibe as I start to figure out what&#039;s happening. Charge it up with the emotional subtext, and you&#039;ll have something here.<br /><br />The only other thing I&#039;d say is that it&#039;ll be hard to sell this as adventure. They&#039;re typically fairly long stories that cover a large time period, multiple diverse locations, and an extended cast. This story is a little tough to classify, but I&#039;d tend to call it normal, maybe dark.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 301

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>nor a breeze shaking the leaves and branches of dead trees//

Why do dead trees have leaves?

>They rolled back into their former places; gravel becoming brick and bricks stacking to become walls.//

A comma would work fine there. The semicolon is really improper, since there's no independent clause after it.

>The maze grew back and the broken statues became whole once more.//

Comma between the clauses.

>The pavement emerged from the dirt-covered floor, slowly advancing towards the bridge in time with the old trees regaining their vitality.//

What's advancing, the floor or the pavement? I can't even apply logic to sort it out, since they'd both be used figuratively. A truly ambiguous modifier.

>onto solid oak desk//

Missing word.

>a black feather, all waiting to be used.

>
>The raven's feather
Seems like you might do better reversing these descriptions. There's no reason to add that it's a raven's feather second, since there's no means in the story to increase our knowledge of it, like a character examining it. But if you just start with it that way, it doesn't stick out so much.

>The letter was slowly composed//

There's an awful lot of passive voice at the beginning, which is where you usually want to grab the reader's interest by being active. In any case, this one really stood out as unnecessary.

>due to the date,//

That comma only needs to be there if you're going to pair it with one before this phrase.

>fever and dark visions; that few guards//

Another improper semicolon.

>barely-remembered//

In two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb, you don't need the hyphen, but inasmuch as Octavia is writing this, she might not know that.

>“Magnus Anima Nocte//

Missing your closing quotes.

>Everfree Castle//

I used to call it that myself, but canon has referred to it as the Castle of the Two Sisters.

>'Winter Charm,’//

Okay, we have a triple inconsistency. First, why use single quotes for this when you've been using doubles? Second, you're mixing styles. The opening quotation mark is a simple style while the closing one is fancy. And you'd placed the comma outside the quotes previously. Either is justifiable for this usage, but keep it consistent.

>away as//

Extraneous space.

>began;//

You're providing an example, so a colon is appropriate here.

>Fillidephia//

Can't say I've seen this spelling before.

>Train 39, departing to Manehattan to be boarded at platform 8.//

Spell out those numbers.

>and from her vantage point at the cafe//

Could use a comma before this to differentiate the functions of the two "and"s.

>One car was painted bright pink, and had a curved ceiling//

No need for that comma. It's all one clause.

>motif of not having anything to do with each other//

Then… how's that a motif? It doesn't really sound like she's being facetious.

>slowly making his way//

Slowly making his way where?

>he paused to sell a copy to a passerby.//

Capitalization.

>as ponies stopped their conversations, ears and eyes lowering as the news were bellowed in the station//

Kind of ungainly to have multiple "as" clauses there. Besides sounding repetitive, it muddles the timeline.

>Her fever had incremented and she was unable to awaken at all but for brief moments in which her eyes would open and she would try to say something before plunging back into unconsciousness and dark dreams.//

Needs a couple of commas between clauses.

>one thousand year//

Hyphenate.

>alter-ego//

No hyphen.

>It was hard for everypony to see their beloved Celestia so distraught, and Princess Luna had made such a huge effort to be recognized and loved that she had finally just started to reap the rewards of her efforts.//

I can't tell whether you mean these to be Octavia's thoughts or what's written in the article.

>attaching her saddlebags back on//

Odd phrasing.

>where her train waited.

>
>There was no point in waiting, maybe inside the train she would get rid of her headache.
Watch the repetition. And a comma splice.

>Octavia sighed and rested against the comfortable seat.//

On it, yes?

>Slowly her eyelids became heavier; the ponies, donkeys and the occasional gryphon outside becoming a blur.//

Misused semicolon.

>She saw the moon rise; a blood-red orb pulsating with dark energy.//

And again.

>She took a nervous step back, looking around wildly, and she felt it watching her take a step forth in her direction.//

I can't tell if that repetition of "step" is on purpose. If so, it doesn't call enough attention to itself. Maybe add something like "of its own" after the second one?

>Octavia jumped through the door to her bedroom and closed it.//

She just got through remarking how far away the door was, and she's already there. It's contradictory.

>she ran towards it, opening it quickly, she looked outside for a way out, but something stopped her//

A danger of participles: they denote simultaneous action, so she opens the window at the same time she's running toward it. That second comma is a splice.

>and mixed with that damnable humming//

Participial phrases are usually set off with a comma.

>There was a quality to it; a certain edge to the lines, that wouldn't let her ignore it.//

Stop it with the semicolons.

>her soul tugged at her conscience and her mind spun into daydreams of- of//

Needs a comma, and use a proper dash.

>slip the invitation back into her saddlebags//

One invitation into multiple saddlebags?

>It had been skipped twice;//

That should be a colon.

>Octavia didn't even acknowledge her, concentrating instead in the vexing process of trying to fish her book out.//

It hasn't gotten overbearing, but you use a lot of participles. This stretch is getting in a rut, though. You end four consecutive sentences with them.

>carefully leaned her cello's container against it//

Given that she had to sling it over her back and secure it there, there's decidedly little rigmarole in getting it back down.

>The cold wind was already raising a slight mist and the locals were beginning to light up the streetlamps.//

Comma between the clauses.

>last minute//

Hyphenate.

>except she had an appointment to attend first//

She just said so.

>you,” she smiled a bit.//

That's not a speaking action.

>Fancypant's//

I've always seen his name as two words.

>I am sorry that it's on such short notice, I was not aware that I would be invited//

Comma splice.

>even if it was just a day//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Octavia nodded, her mind still preoccupied by the missing saddlebags.//

This is pretty blunt. Since you've been willing to take a very subjective viewpoint, why not deliver this through indirect thought?

>in—”//

>would–”//
Inconsistent type of dash.

>Octavia interrupted//

I already know that from the punctuation. You don't need to have the narrator reiterate.

>with incredulity//

Telly and redundant with the rest of the description anyway.

>“I'm sorry,” Rarity apologized.//

Redundant speaking verb, and we're starting to get into quite a few saidisms.

>Rarity's horn flashed and an LP floated out of its place on a shelf.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Octavia recognized it instantly, it was one of the few records she had published.//

Comma splice.

>reigning herself in//

Reining.

>But— how could she— I never let her! She— oh//

You don't need the spaces after the dashes.

>Rarity made soothing motions with her hooves.//

What does this look like? I can't envision it.

>I- I//

No space after the hyphen in a stutter.

>say,” Octavia sat down hard//

Not a speaking action.

>the Sugarcube Corner//

For a specific place name, you don't include "the," unless it's actually part of the official name. You go to the store, but you go to Target.

>“Oh, I- I'm sorry, Miss Rarity, as you can see, my mind is all over the place, what was it that you asked?”//

Holy comma splices, Batman!

>“Don't worry,” Rarity smiled.//

Not a speaking action.

>career,” she whispered, then spoke louder, “It's //

When you transition out of a quote and back in, it implies the two parts of the quote are a single sentence, but they aren't here.

>“Well then,” her magic flashed and suddenly several more fabrics floated out//

Not a speaking action.

>earlier,” Rarity shrugged.//

Not a speaking action.

I really don't have any abstract problems here, just mechanical, but they're quite pervasive. You need consistency with dash/hyphen usage, watch the comma and semicolon usage, and don't use non-speaking actions as dialogue tags. The relevant sections at the top of this thread are "comma use with conjunctions" and "dialogue punctuation/capitalization."

It's probably also worth a look at all the "to be" verbs you use. They're inherently boring, as nothing happens. Active verbs keep the reader's interest much better. You have 79 instances of "was" alone in this chapter. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 184. That's even a little more frequent than one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen.

Since these are almost all cosmetic things, I don't need to give it the usual scrutiny, so select the "back from Mars" option when you resubmit.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nor a breeze shaking the leaves and branches of dead trees//</span><br />Why do dead trees have leaves?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They rolled back into their former places; gravel becoming brick and bricks stacking to become walls.//</span><br />A comma would work fine there. The semicolon is really improper, since there&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The maze grew back and the broken statues became whole once more.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pavement emerged from the dirt-covered floor, slowly advancing towards the bridge in time with the old trees regaining their vitality.//</span><br />What&#039;s advancing, the floor or the pavement? I can&#039;t even apply logic to sort it out, since they&#039;d both be used figuratively. A truly ambiguous modifier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;onto solid oak desk//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a black feather, all waiting to be used.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;The raven&#039;s feather</span><br />Seems like you might do better reversing these descriptions. There&#039;s no reason to add that it&#039;s a raven&#039;s feather second, since there&#039;s no means in the story to increase our knowledge of it, like a character examining it. But if you just start with it that way, it doesn&#039;t stick out so much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The letter was slowly composed//</span><br />There&#039;s an awful lot of passive voice at the beginning, which is where you usually want to grab the reader&#039;s interest by being active. In any case, this one really stood out as unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;due to the date,//</span><br />That comma only needs to be there if you&#039;re going to pair it with one before this phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fever and dark visions; that few guards//</span><br />Another improper semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;barely-remembered//</span><br />In two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb, you don&#039;t need the hyphen, but inasmuch as Octavia is writing this, she might not know that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Magnus Anima Nocte//</span><br />Missing your closing quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everfree Castle//</span><br />I used to call it that myself, but canon has referred to it as the Castle of the Two Sisters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;Winter Charm,’//</span><br />Okay, we have a triple inconsistency. First, why use single quotes for this when you&#039;ve been using doubles? Second, you&#039;re mixing styles. The opening quotation mark is a simple style while the closing one is fancy. And you&#039;d placed the comma outside the quotes previously. Either is justifiable for this usage, but keep it consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;away as//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;began;//</span><br />You&#039;re providing an example, so a colon is appropriate here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fillidephia//</span><br />Can&#039;t say I&#039;ve seen this spelling before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Train 39, departing to Manehattan to be boarded at platform 8.//</span><br />Spell out those numbers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and from her vantage point at the cafe//</span><br />Could use a comma before this to differentiate the functions of the two &quot;and&quot;s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One car was painted bright pink, and had a curved ceiling//</span><br />No need for that comma. It&#039;s all one clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;motif of not having anything to do with each other//</span><br />Then… how&#039;s that a motif? It doesn&#039;t really sound like she&#039;s being facetious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;slowly making his way//</span><br />Slowly making his way where?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he paused to sell a copy to a passerby.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as ponies stopped their conversations, ears and eyes lowering as the news were bellowed in the station//</span><br />Kind of ungainly to have multiple &quot;as&quot; clauses there. Besides sounding repetitive, it muddles the timeline.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her fever had incremented and she was unable to awaken at all but for brief moments in which her eyes would open and she would try to say something before plunging back into unconsciousness and dark dreams.//</span><br />Needs a couple of commas between clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one thousand year//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;alter-ego//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was hard for everypony to see their beloved Celestia so distraught, and Princess Luna had made such a huge effort to be recognized and loved that she had finally just started to reap the rewards of her efforts.//</span><br />I can&#039;t tell whether you mean these to be Octavia&#039;s thoughts or what&#039;s written in the article.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;attaching her saddlebags back on//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;where her train waited.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;There was no point in waiting, maybe inside the train she would get rid of her headache.</span><br />Watch the repetition. And a comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia sighed and rested against the comfortable seat.//</span><br />On it, yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Slowly her eyelids became heavier; the ponies, donkeys and the occasional gryphon outside becoming a blur.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She saw the moon rise; a blood-red orb pulsating with dark energy.//</span><br />And again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She took a nervous step back, looking around wildly, and she felt it watching her take a step forth in her direction.//</span><br />I can&#039;t tell if that repetition of &quot;step&quot; is on purpose. If so, it doesn&#039;t call enough attention to itself. Maybe add something like &quot;of its own&quot; after the second one?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia jumped through the door to her bedroom and closed it.//</span><br />She just got through remarking how far away the door was, and she&#039;s already there. It&#039;s contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she ran towards it, opening it quickly, she looked outside for a way out, but something stopped her//</span><br />A danger of participles: they denote simultaneous action, so she opens the window at the same time she&#039;s running toward it. That second comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and mixed with that damnable humming//</span><br />Participial phrases are usually set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was a quality to it; a certain edge to the lines, that wouldn&#039;t let her ignore it.//</span><br />Stop it with the semicolons.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her soul tugged at her conscience and her mind spun into daydreams of- of//</span><br />Needs a comma, and use a proper dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;slip the invitation back into her saddlebags//</span><br />One invitation into multiple saddlebags?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It had been skipped twice;//</span><br />That should be a colon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia didn&#039;t even acknowledge her, concentrating instead in the vexing process of trying to fish her book out.//</span><br />It hasn&#039;t gotten overbearing, but you use a lot of participles. This stretch is getting in a rut, though. You end four consecutive sentences with them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;carefully leaned her cello&#039;s container against it//</span><br />Given that she had to sling it over her back and secure it there, there&#039;s decidedly little rigmarole in getting it back down.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The cold wind was already raising a slight mist and the locals were beginning to light up the streetlamps.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;last minute//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;except she had an appointment to attend first//</span><br />She just said so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you,” she smiled a bit.//</span><br />That&#039;s not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fancypant&#039;s//</span><br />I&#039;ve always seen his name as two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I am sorry that it&#039;s on such short notice, I was not aware that I would be invited//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even if it was just a day//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia nodded, her mind still preoccupied by the missing saddlebags.//</span><br />This is pretty blunt. Since you&#039;ve been willing to take a very subjective viewpoint, why not deliver this through indirect thought?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in—”//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;would–”//</span><br />Inconsistent type of dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia interrupted//</span><br />I already know that from the punctuation. You don&#039;t need to have the narrator reiterate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with incredulity//</span><br />Telly and redundant with the rest of the description anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I&#039;m sorry,” Rarity apologized.//</span><br />Redundant speaking verb, and we&#039;re starting to get into quite a few saidisms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity&#039;s horn flashed and an LP floated out of its place on a shelf.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Octavia recognized it instantly, it was one of the few records she had published.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reigning herself in//</span><br />Reining.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But— how could she— I never let her! She— oh//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the spaces after the dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity made soothing motions with her hooves.//</span><br />What does this look like? I can&#039;t envision it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I- I//</span><br />No space after the hyphen in a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;say,” Octavia sat down hard//</span><br />Not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the Sugarcube Corner//</span><br />For a specific place name, you don&#039;t include &quot;the,&quot; unless it&#039;s actually part of the official name. You go to the store, but you go to Target.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh, I- I&#039;m sorry, Miss Rarity, as you can see, my mind is all over the place, what was it that you asked?”//</span><br />Holy comma splices, Batman!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Don&#039;t worry,” Rarity smiled.//</span><br />Not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;career,” she whispered, then spoke louder, “It&#039;s //</span><br />When you transition out of a quote and back in, it implies the two parts of the quote are a single sentence, but they aren&#039;t here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Well then,” her magic flashed and suddenly several more fabrics floated out//</span><br />Not a speaking action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;earlier,” Rarity shrugged.//</span><br />Not a speaking action.<br /><br />I really don&#039;t have any abstract problems here, just mechanical, but they&#039;re quite pervasive. You need consistency with dash/hyphen usage, watch the comma and semicolon usage, and don&#039;t use non-speaking actions as dialogue tags. The relevant sections at the top of this thread are &quot;comma use with conjunctions&quot; and &quot;dialogue punctuation/capitalization.&quot;<br /><br />It&#039;s probably also worth a look at all the &quot;to be&quot; verbs you use. They&#039;re inherently boring, as nothing happens. Active verbs keep the reader&#039;s interest much better. You have 79 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone in this chapter. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 184. That&#039;s even a little more frequent than one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen.<br /><br />Since these are almost all cosmetic things, I don&#039;t need to give it the usual scrutiny, so select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option when you resubmit.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Nov 3rd, 2014 22:42</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 302

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Are you sure you didn't want the title to be "Twilight's Socks"? And in the synopsis, wouldn't she have two pairs of socks?

>On the table there were four socks. By their side, a pony stared at them as if they held the key to all the mysteries of the universe. For the past hour she has been looking at them, lifting them, sniffing at them. Tasting them. All this has been to make sure that they are, without a doubt, ready. There was more to them than wool and color. Her desire, for a start.//

The verb tense keeps going back and forth between past and present. Keep it consistent. Actually, both mistakes were using "has" where "had" was needed. Maybe they were both typos?

>magnificently erect//

While a valid phrasing, it really evokes a sexual image. Not sure if that was intended.

>the softest you could get around Ponyville//

Try to avoid addressing the reader. Something like "the softest available in Ponyville" would work fine.

>Sometimes, socks are what will have to make do when your goal is perfection.//

Addressing the reader again.

>ending to his wrist//

"With," not "to."

>cooperation//

You sure you didn't mean "coordination"?

>to the point//

Odd phrasing. Is this an idiom that doesn't translate well?

>her place on the small table//

"On" here would mean she's up on top of it. You want "at."

>I know it breaks the tradition//

Unnecessary "the."

>Right from the ‘Cooking for Queens: A Saddle-Arabian Guide to the Kitchen.’//

Another unnecessary "the," and a book title wouldn't be in quotes. Underline or (preferably) italicize it.

>A shadow of worry crossed Spike’s eyes.//

Don't have the narrator interpret it as worry for me. Let me see what it looks like and judge for myself.

>Saddle-Arabia//

No hyphen.

>shined//

This is the past tense of the transitive form. You need "shone."

>So what you said the carpets//

about the carpets

>cereals//

It's a collective noun. Just use it in the singular.

>milk from the cupboards//

Won't milk spoil if she keeps it in the cupboard?

>opposite to Twilight//

You don't need that "to."

>cereals//

Again, singular.

>That joke is so old it’s starting to get real//

I don't get it. Maybe it just doesn't translate well?

>cereals//

Just search and replace this. You only use it in the plural if you're talking about multiple varieties.

>main front//

Just "front" will do.

>Heroine of the day, remember?//

Another phrase I don't understand. It also sounds like they're getting a delivery of illegal drugs.

>who quickly scooped the bowls and spoons from the purple halo’s grasp//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>read out aloud://

Keep the dialogue in the same paragraph as the label for it.

>Expect for more//

Odd phrasing. Just "expect more" or something like "watch out for more."

>equally-petite//

When a two-word modifier starts with an -ly adverb, you don't use a hyphen.

>held up by Twilight//

I don't see the advantage of passive voice here.

>in the dim//

dimness

>As far as she could tell, somepony had really put effort to it.//

>He looked up to the ceiling with the idea of a gamble looming behind his eyes.//
Your perspective has wavered a bit. Here are a couple of examples. It's fine to switch to Spike here as you close the scene, since Twilight isn't there to see this. But you don't want to keep going back and forth. Be careful who holds the apparent perspective in the narration.

>still dribbling a bit. There was still//

Watch the close repetition.

>in mail//

in the mail

>And yet,//

No reason to have a comma there.

>the actual premises of the party extended well beyond the castle//

Odd usage of "premises."

>birthday’s//

You need a plural here, not a possessive.

>And this pony had a lot on her life that could do with some justifying.//

Okay, repetition does create an effect, but his paragraph feels like it says the same thing three or four times.

>towards the Castle//

No reason to capitalize that, since it's used generically.

>saddleback//

saddlebag

>bare//

bear

>princess's//

The style of the apostrophe doesn't match the rest of the story.

>without hardly a glance//

with

>after a fleeting glimpse after//

Watch the repetition.

>wouldn’t have shamed a walrus//

would

>overtaking//

Odd word choice. Not sure what you meant to say here. Oh, the English expression is cutting/breaking/jumping in line.

>every time//

This is what caught me last time in thinking the mystery pony was Pinkie, since it sounds like she's waited in line multiple times and brought multiple presents.

>Some of Pinkie’s confetti had rained upon Twilight, and as she shook them off her mane//

Confetti is a collective term. Use "it," not "them."

>A purple halo seized it and turned around to reveal a few lines of the same//

Sounds like the halo is turning around, not the paper.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>Laying on top//

Lying

>That is what you’re supposed to do, anything else would be considered suspicious. //

Addressing the reader, comma splice.

>At a minute’s intervals//

"At a minute's interval" or "at one-minute intervals."

>saddleback//

Saddlebag. Do a search and replace for this.

>–to which I said: ‘You can’t buy speed, hun’.//

Capitalize this, since we never got the beginning of the quote.

>There was laughter, to which the pony joined.//

That "to" is extraneous.

>One only had to glimpse at those eyes//

Extraneous "at."

>A kind of like the pony was feeling right now.//

Extraneous "of."

>Dash took a step to shake the pony gently from the shoulder.//

"By," not "from."

>and only one would be the wiser of it.//

Comma to set off the dependent clause.

>So you’d think.//

Addressing the reader.

>stetson//

Capitalize

>sugar cube//

As a term of endearment, I've always seen this as one word.

>Not even on winter//

In, not on

>They arrived to the main hall//

At, not to.

>After a quick recollection//

Odd phrasing. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

>Various painful grunts followed.//

Vague and oddly phrased.

>muttered Spike//

He just did that the last time he spoke. Besides getting repetitive, you don't want to use too many unusual speaking verbs, or they take away from the dialogue.

>blurt it all over her face//

Another expression that doesn't translate? I'd just say "blurt it out."

>Spike strangled the instinct to glance at the pony.//

Why are you going into his perspective, and for only a sentence? Another character can note how he acts, particularly Dash, since you've gone over to her.

>That you have all four//

Until you have all four

>I supposed you could be right//

suppose

>who rushed to help her//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>more louder//

Cut the "more."

>on the morning//

In, not on.

>She was about to circle the other mare, but her conversational tone put a stop to that.//

Why would a conversational tone stop her?

>Saddle-Arabia//

No hyphen.

>whoever you’ve planned giving them to//

Comma before this, and "planned on giving them to."

>And they were itching me so bad!//

You used a similar phrasing earlier in the story, but it's just odd. Itching in the context of socks means something else entirely. I'd expect her to say something like "I just couldn't wait" or "It's been bothering me all night."

>laid them on Twilight’s feet//

At, not on.

>Because it has to.//

It' not really a true sentiment, not without a little explanation. There's no reason she couldn't tell Twilight later on, for instance. Or if Derpy has given up on trying to do so, she ought to say it.

The only other thing I'd say is that it's worth combing the story to see if you can use more active verbs. Of the easier forms to search, I counted 225 "to be" verbs. They're very boring, as nothing happens. Action is much more interesting to read. This is a rate of about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen.

It's a nice story, and if it were much longer, I just couldn't spend the time to go through it in detail like this. It's come up with your stories before, though, that the main issues were odd word choice and phrasings that seem to stem from an unfamiliarity with English. You've gotten enough readers now that you should be able to recruit someone who can help you with that. The reviewing groups mentioned in the Omnibus could too (link near the top of this thread).Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Are you sure you didn&#039;t want the title to be &quot;Twilight&#039;s Socks&quot;? And in the synopsis, wouldn&#039;t she have two pairs of socks?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On the table there were four socks. By their side, a pony stared at them as if they held the key to all the mysteries of the universe. For the past hour she has been looking at them, lifting them, sniffing at them. Tasting them. All this has been to make sure that they are, without a doubt, ready. There was more to them than wool and color. Her desire, for a start.//</span><br />The verb tense keeps going back and forth between past and present. Keep it consistent. Actually, both mistakes were using &quot;has&quot; where &quot;had&quot; was needed. Maybe they were both typos?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;magnificently erect//</span><br />While a valid phrasing, it really evokes a sexual image. Not sure if that was intended.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the softest you could get around Ponyville//</span><br />Try to avoid addressing the reader. Something like &quot;the softest available in Ponyville&quot; would work fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sometimes, socks are what will have to make do when your goal is perfection.//</span><br />Addressing the reader again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ending to his wrist//</span><br />&quot;With,&quot; not &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cooperation//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;coordination&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to the point//</span><br />Odd phrasing. Is this an idiom that doesn&#039;t translate well?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her place on the small table//</span><br />&quot;On&quot; here would mean she&#039;s up on top of it. You want &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know it breaks the tradition//</span><br />Unnecessary &quot;the.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Right from the ‘Cooking for Queens: A Saddle-Arabian Guide to the Kitchen.’//</span><br />Another unnecessary &quot;the,&quot; and a book title wouldn&#039;t be in quotes. Underline or (preferably) italicize it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A shadow of worry crossed Spike’s eyes.//</span><br />Don&#039;t have the narrator interpret it as worry for me. Let me see what it looks like and judge for myself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Saddle-Arabia//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shined//</span><br />This is the past tense of the transitive form. You need &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So what you said the carpets//</span><br />about the carpets<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cereals//</span><br />It&#039;s a collective noun. Just use it in the singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;milk from the cupboards//</span><br />Won&#039;t milk spoil if she keeps it in the cupboard?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;opposite to Twilight//</span><br />You don&#039;t need that &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cereals//</span><br />Again, singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That joke is so old it’s starting to get real//</span><br />I don&#039;t get it. Maybe it just doesn&#039;t translate well?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cereals//</span><br />Just search and replace this. You only use it in the plural if you&#039;re talking about multiple varieties.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;main front//</span><br />Just &quot;front&quot; will do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Heroine of the day, remember?//</span><br />Another phrase I don&#039;t understand. It also sounds like they&#039;re getting a delivery of illegal drugs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who quickly scooped the bowls and spoons from the purple halo’s grasp//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;read out aloud://</span><br />Keep the dialogue in the same paragraph as the label for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Expect for more//</span><br />Odd phrasing. Just &quot;expect more&quot; or something like &quot;watch out for more.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;equally-petite//</span><br />When a two-word modifier starts with an -ly adverb, you don&#039;t use a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;held up by Twilight//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the advantage of passive voice here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in the dim//</span><br />dimness<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As far as she could tell, somepony had really put effort to it.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He looked up to the ceiling with the idea of a gamble looming behind his eyes.//</span><br />Your perspective has wavered a bit. Here are a couple of examples. It&#039;s fine to switch to Spike here as you close the scene, since Twilight isn&#039;t there to see this. But you don&#039;t want to keep going back and forth. Be careful who holds the apparent perspective in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still dribbling a bit. There was still//</span><br />Watch the close repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in mail//</span><br />in the mail<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And yet,//</span><br />No reason to have a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the actual premises of the party extended well beyond the castle//</span><br />Odd usage of &quot;premises.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;birthday’s//</span><br />You need a plural here, not a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And this pony had a lot on her life that could do with some justifying.//</span><br />Okay, repetition does create an effect, but his paragraph feels like it says the same thing three or four times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;towards the Castle//</span><br />No reason to capitalize that, since it&#039;s used generically.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saddleback//</span><br />saddlebag<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bare//</span><br />bear<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princess&#039;s//</span><br />The style of the apostrophe doesn&#039;t match the rest of the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;without hardly a glance//</span><br />with<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after a fleeting glimpse after//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wouldn’t have shamed a walrus//</span><br />would<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;overtaking//</span><br />Odd word choice. Not sure what you meant to say here. Oh, the English expression is cutting/breaking/jumping in line.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;every time//</span><br />This is what caught me last time in thinking the mystery pony was Pinkie, since it sounds like she&#039;s waited in line multiple times and brought multiple presents.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Some of Pinkie’s confetti had rained upon Twilight, and as she shook them off her mane//</span><br />Confetti is a collective term. Use &quot;it,&quot; not &quot;them.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A purple halo seized it and turned around to reveal a few lines of the same//</span><br />Sounds like the halo is turning around, not the paper.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Laying on top//</span><br />Lying<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That is what you’re supposed to do, anything else would be considered suspicious. //</span><br />Addressing the reader, comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At a minute’s intervals//</span><br />&quot;At a minute&#039;s interval&quot; or &quot;at one-minute intervals.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saddleback//</span><br />Saddlebag. Do a search and replace for this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;–to which I said: ‘You can’t buy speed, hun’.//</span><br />Capitalize this, since we never got the beginning of the quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was laughter, to which the pony joined.//</span><br />That &quot;to&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;One only had to glimpse at those eyes//</span><br />Extraneous &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A kind of like the pony was feeling right now.//</span><br />Extraneous &quot;of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dash took a step to shake the pony gently from the shoulder.//</span><br />&quot;By,&quot; not &quot;from.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and only one would be the wiser of it.//</span><br />Comma to set off the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So you’d think.//</span><br />Addressing the reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;stetson//</span><br />Capitalize<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sugar cube//</span><br />As a term of endearment, I&#039;ve always seen this as one word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not even on winter//</span><br />In, not on<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They arrived to the main hall//</span><br />At, not to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After a quick recollection//</span><br />Odd phrasing. I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re trying to say.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Various painful grunts followed.//</span><br />Vague and oddly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;muttered Spike//</span><br />He just did that the last time he spoke. Besides getting repetitive, you don&#039;t want to use too many unusual speaking verbs, or they take away from the dialogue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blurt it all over her face//</span><br />Another expression that doesn&#039;t translate? I&#039;d just say &quot;blurt it out.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike strangled the instinct to glance at the pony.//</span><br />Why are you going into his perspective, and for only a sentence? Another character can note how he acts, particularly Dash, since you&#039;ve gone over to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That you have all four//</span><br />Until you have all four<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I supposed you could be right//</span><br />suppose<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who rushed to help her//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;more louder//</span><br />Cut the &quot;more.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on the morning//</span><br />In, not on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was about to circle the other mare, but her conversational tone put a stop to that.//</span><br />Why would a conversational tone stop her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Saddle-Arabia//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whoever you’ve planned giving them to//</span><br />Comma before this, and &quot;planned on giving them to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And they were itching me so bad!//</span><br />You used a similar phrasing earlier in the story, but it&#039;s just odd. Itching in the context of socks means something else entirely. I&#039;d expect her to say something like &quot;I just couldn&#039;t wait&quot; or &quot;It&#039;s been bothering me all night.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laid them on Twilight’s feet//</span><br />At, not on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Because it has to.//</span><br />It&#039; not really a true sentiment, not without a little explanation. There&#039;s no reason she couldn&#039;t tell Twilight later on, for instance. Or if Derpy has given up on trying to do so, she ought to say it.<br /><br />The only other thing I&#039;d say is that it&#039;s worth combing the story to see if you can use more active verbs. Of the easier forms to search, I counted 225 &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re very boring, as nothing happens. Action is much more interesting to read. This is a rate of about one every other sentence. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen.<br /><br />It&#039;s a nice story, and if it were much longer, I just couldn&#039;t spend the time to go through it in detail like this. It&#039;s come up with your stories before, though, that the main issues were odd word choice and phrasings that seem to stem from an unfamiliarity with English. You&#039;ve gotten enough readers now that you should be able to recruit someone who can help you with that. The reviewing groups mentioned in the Omnibus could too (link near the top of this thread).<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 303

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>with an elated tone//

Let me see this. The beginning of story is an especially bad place to be telly. You need to form an immediate connection between reader and character by drawing him into her viewpoint. Telliness keeps the reader distant.

>The seamstress lowered her fabric scissors onto her work table and let out a sigh of relief, brushing a stray hair that was marring the perfection that was her magnificent coiffure as she took a step back from the mannequin and admired her handiwork.//

The "of relief" is also telly and redundant with the sigh. This sentence rambles on so long that it loses focus. Is it about her finishing her work, feeling accomplished, fixing her mane, or looking over her work? It just gets overwhelming and jumbled when it tries to do that all at once. This probably deserves two or three sentences to cover. And speaking of doing a lot at once, participles and "as" clauses show simultaneous action, so she sighs, brushes a hair away, and takes a step back all at the same time. While possible, it feels unnatural and hurts the pacing.

>mid sentence//

Hyphenate.

>at the dress at something//

Repetitive phrasing.

>broach//

brooch

>high pitched//

Hyphenate.

>she was screaming loudly and dancing on the tips of her hooves as her horn glowed with magic the spider was thrown out of the window//

Syntax is off somewhere. There are a couple different ways to rephrase it, depending on how you meant to say it.

>sigh of relief//

You sure like that phrase.

>towering over her//

Badly placed modifier. Grammatically, it's want to modify the nearest prior object, "she." Next, the eye goes to the sentence's subject, "tub." Neither is what you mean.

>sighed//

This is already the third sigh in the last three paragraphs.

>Levitating over an inflatable pillow, she snuggled it behind her//

Another synchronization issue with a participle. She wouldn't snuggle it until after she'd levitated it over.

>and sighed once more//

Oh, look. A fourth one.

>cd-player//

Is there a reason you need more advanced tech in this story? I don't think we've seen anything more modern than a record player in canon.

>Opening up her bathroom cupboard above the sink, she levitated out a box of chocolates//

More synchronization problems.

>levitating a chocolate//

…And this is pretty repetitive with it.

>Leaning back into the inflatable pillow//

You'll usually set off a participial phrase with a comma. And I'll note here that you use an absolute ton of them. It's lending your sentence structure a repetitive feel. The more unusual a structure is, the less you can repeat it without drawing attention to it. You have 5 participial phrases in only four sentences over the last two paragraphs.

>at the vets//

That needs to be possessive, not plural.

>and she had vanquished evil itself//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>high pitched shriek//

This is the exact same phrasing you used before.

>unlady-like//

unladylike

>obscuring her vision as she ran for the door//

And for the third time in the last couple paragraphs, you use two participles in a single sentence.

>She flailed her hind legs as hard as she could//

And now you've used "as" clauses in three consecutive sentences.

>Rarity let out a sigh//

Sigh number six in the story already.

>Water dripping with every step.//

The sentence fragment feels out of place. It's inconsistent with the narration you've been using lately.

>wearily//

Every sentence in the scene so far has an -ly adverb. These are weak descriptors, because they usually force a conclusion on me instead of letting me draw one from the evidence. Describe her as if you were a sketch artist. Make her look and act weary, and I'll believe it.

>weary eyed//

Hyphenate. And it's repetitive with that "wearily."

>making her way for the bedroom door//

>Making her way through the hallway and down the stairs//
Repetitive.

Okay, suffice it to say there are notable problems with being repetitive, telly, and overuse of participial phrases. It's really drwaing attention away from the story and toward the words on the page, which is a bad thing. I'm not going to point those out anymore.

>Basil//

Why is this capitalized?

>Licking her lips as she popped the lid open, her jaw//

This explicitly says her jaw was licking her lips.

>eight, black soulless eyes//

You already made a point of mentioning how many eyes it has.

>T-there//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated.

>maniacally way//

Typo.

>with the label.//

Why would you put the indicated text in a separate paragraph?

>The boutique, was silent.//

What in the world is that comma doing there?

>~//

This is not punctuation.

>followed suite//

suit

>shriek//

She shrieks 8 times in this story.

>the unicorn charge the spider//

Verb tense.

>once clean//

Hyphenate.

>one after the other,//

This needs to be a period.

Well. I think the message here is repetition. I wouldn't have given a detailed review like this, but another pre-reader requested a second look. This story is incredibly repetitive in phrasing, in sentence structure, in word choice, in action.

The ending is kind of disturbing, too, both in how cruel Pinkie and Dash would be to her, and in how Pinkie would be fine in having all those spiders get killed.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with an elated tone//</span><br />Let me see this. The beginning of story is an especially bad place to be telly. You need to form an immediate connection between reader and character by drawing him into her viewpoint. Telliness keeps the reader distant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The seamstress lowered her fabric scissors onto her work table and let out a sigh of relief, brushing a stray hair that was marring the perfection that was her magnificent coiffure as she took a step back from the mannequin and admired her handiwork.//</span><br />The &quot;of relief&quot; is also telly and redundant with the sigh. This sentence rambles on so long that it loses focus. Is it about her finishing her work, feeling accomplished, fixing her mane, or looking over her work? It just gets overwhelming and jumbled when it tries to do that all at once. This probably deserves two or three sentences to cover. And speaking of doing a lot at once, participles and &quot;as&quot; clauses show simultaneous action, so she sighs, brushes a hair away, and takes a step back all at the same time. While possible, it feels unnatural and hurts the pacing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mid sentence//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at the dress at something//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;broach//</span><br />brooch<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high pitched//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was screaming loudly and dancing on the tips of her hooves as her horn glowed with magic the spider was thrown out of the window//</span><br />Syntax is off somewhere. There are a couple different ways to rephrase it, depending on how you meant to say it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sigh of relief//</span><br />You sure like that phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;towering over her//</span><br />Badly placed modifier. Grammatically, it&#039;s want to modify the nearest prior object, &quot;she.&quot; Next, the eye goes to the sentence&#039;s subject, &quot;tub.&quot; Neither is what you mean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sighed//</span><br />This is already the third sigh in the last three paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Levitating over an inflatable pillow, she snuggled it behind her//</span><br />Another synchronization issue with a participle. She wouldn&#039;t snuggle it until after she&#039;d levitated it over.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and sighed once more//</span><br />Oh, look. A fourth one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cd-player//</span><br />Is there a reason you need more advanced tech in this story? I don&#039;t think we&#039;ve seen anything more modern than a record player in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Opening up her bathroom cupboard above the sink, she levitated out a box of chocolates//</span><br />More synchronization problems.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;levitating a chocolate//</span><br />…And this is pretty repetitive with it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Leaning back into the inflatable pillow//</span><br />You&#039;ll usually set off a participial phrase with a comma. And I&#039;ll note here that you use an absolute ton of them. It&#039;s lending your sentence structure a repetitive feel. The more unusual a structure is, the less you can repeat it without drawing attention to it. You have 5 participial phrases in only four sentences over the last two paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at the vets//</span><br />That needs to be possessive, not plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she had vanquished evil itself//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high pitched shriek//</span><br />This is the exact same phrasing you used before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unlady-like//</span><br />unladylike<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;obscuring her vision as she ran for the door//</span><br />And for the third time in the last couple paragraphs, you use two participles in a single sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She flailed her hind legs as hard as she could//</span><br />And now you&#039;ve used &quot;as&quot; clauses in three consecutive sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity let out a sigh//</span><br />Sigh number six in the story already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Water dripping with every step.//</span><br />The sentence fragment feels out of place. It&#039;s inconsistent with the narration you&#039;ve been using lately.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wearily//</span><br />Every sentence in the scene so far has an -ly adverb. These are weak descriptors, because they usually force a conclusion on me instead of letting me draw one from the evidence. Describe her as if you were a sketch artist. Make her look and act weary, and I&#039;ll believe it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;weary eyed//</span><br />Hyphenate. And it&#039;s repetitive with that &quot;wearily.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;making her way for the bedroom door//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Making her way through the hallway and down the stairs//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br />Okay, suffice it to say there are notable problems with being repetitive, telly, and overuse of participial phrases. It&#039;s really drwaing attention away from the story and toward the words on the page, which is a bad thing. I&#039;m not going to point those out anymore.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Basil//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Licking her lips as she popped the lid open, her jaw//</span><br />This explicitly says her jaw was licking her lips.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eight, black soulless eyes//</span><br />You already made a point of mentioning how many eyes it has.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-there//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;maniacally way//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with the label.//</span><br />Why would you put the indicated text in a separate paragraph?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The boutique, was silent.//</span><br />What in the world is that comma doing there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;~//</span><br />This is not punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;followed suite//</span><br />suit<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shriek//</span><br />She shrieks 8 times in this story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the unicorn charge the spider//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once clean//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one after the other,//</span><br />This needs to be a period.<br /><br />Well. I think the message here is repetition. I wouldn&#039;t have given a detailed review like this, but another pre-reader requested a second look. This story is incredibly repetitive in phrasing, in sentence structure, in word choice, in action.<br /><br />The ending is kind of disturbing, too, both in how cruel Pinkie and Dash would be to her, and in how Pinkie would be fine in having all those spiders get killed.<br />

StankuCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 304

>>131131
Thanks again for the help, mysterious stranger. Apparently this is not the first time we have met, but your serial number still remains rather unfamiliar to me. In any case, I went over the spelling mistakes and odd phrases, some of which were awkard translations and others simple blunders. The bits where I addressed the reader were not intentional: I meant the "you" to stand for "one", and for most cases I fixed the issue by swapping the two. Hopefully that's okay. Oh yeah, and more active verbs were incerted in place of passive ones.

It's a funny thing, but I feel more at home with academic English than with fiction. I swear, some of my English essays have better grammar than the Finnish ones.

Thanks again!
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131131" onclick="return highlight('131131', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131131">&gt;&gt;131131</a><br />Thanks again for the help, mysterious stranger. Apparently this is not the first time we have met, but your serial number still remains rather unfamiliar to me. In any case, I went over the spelling mistakes and odd phrases, some of which were awkard translations and others simple blunders. The bits where I addressed the reader were not intentional: I meant the &quot;you&quot; to stand for &quot;one&quot;, and for most cases I fixed the issue by swapping the two. Hopefully that&#039;s okay. Oh yeah, and more active verbs were incerted in place of passive ones. <br /><br />It&#039;s a funny thing, but I feel more at home with academic English than with fiction. I swear, some of my English essays have better grammar than the Finnish ones. <br /><br />Thanks again!<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Fri, Nov 7th, 2014 11:34</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 305

>>131150
I gave you extensive feedback for "The Road to Prolegomena." >>130268 and >>130406<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131150" onclick="return highlight('131150', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131150">&gt;&gt;131150</a><br />I gave you extensive feedback for &quot;The Road to Prolegomena.&quot; <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130268" onclick="return highlight('130268', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130268">&gt;&gt;130268</a> and <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#130406" onclick="return highlight('130406', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|130406">&gt;&gt;130406</a><br />

Thanks! Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 306

Hey, this is Venates! I just want to say thanks again for the feedback on my story, and for helping me get featured on EQD! It truly means a lot to me!Hey, this is Venates! I just want to say thanks again for the feedback on my story, and for helping me get featured on EQD! It truly means a lot to me!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 307

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I watched the drapes flow gracefully in the gentle breeze, they were rising and falling listlessly without a care in the world.//

Comma splice.

>five mile//

Hyphenate the compound descriptor.

>or is it me who will miss them being fillies//

I, not me. I guess it's your call as to whether Rarity knows that, since this is her thought, but she strikes me as the type who'd use this type of grammar.

>I had set my book aside after marking the page. Any second now Sweetie will come charging through that door to disrupt my peaceful afternoon.//

Your tense is wavering, and this isn't the only place it happens. "Had set" is a completed action in a past-tense narration, but "will come charging" is looking forward from a present-tense narration.

>I don't stop her, or do anything to dissuade her.//

No need for that comma. It's all one clause.

>What she doesn't realize is, some bruises aren't skin deep.//

These actually are (implied) separate clauses, but it's an arrangement that typically does't use a comma.

>hoof steps//

One word, like footsteps.

>It sounded like she was doing her best not to be heard.//

This is redundant and far less subtle than what you already said.

>I knocked on the door gently but she didn't answer.//

In this case, you do have multiple clauses, so put a comma between them.

>Sweetie was obviously upset and I needed to comfort her.//

Comma between the clauses.

>She gave the slightest of nods and I gazed into those watery, droopy green eyes.//

Comma between the clauses.

>"Darling, please… talk to me."//

Terminate the italics before the quotation marks.

>I pleaded but it was in vain.//

Comma between the clauses. It seems like this will be a consistent thing. There's a section at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions" with a few examples.

>Her expression never changed: distant yet sad.//

You were doing fine before. It's better to demonstrate how she feels through the raw evidence of her actions and appearance. If the narration is adequate, I'll conclude on my own from your description that she's sad. When you get me to figure it out, I'll have a much closer connection to the character. There's a section on this, too: "show versus tell."

>She would rather to be alone.//

Extraneous "to."

>Oh Sweetie Belle! What have they done to her? Why do they torment her so?//

Okay, you're laying it on thick here. Nothing kills authenticity like melodrama.

>Who are you kidding Rarity?//

Comma for direct address.

>I didn't want to see the mascara running down my face like ink spilling from a broken pen.//

This is my first indication that she's been crying, so it comes up pretty suddenly. I wouldn't state it outright, but you should somehow hint when she starts.

>That will cheer her up and she can tell me what happened.//

Comma between the clauses.

>This. Is. The. Worst. Most. Horrible. Thing!

Okay, maybe I'll take back the thing about melodrama, if you're going to maintain this tone, but it does take away seriousness from Sweetie Belle's situation, and you haven't tagged it as comedy.

>element of generosity//

I normally see that capitalized, and you need a comma after it.

>lay down next to her//

>But laying there simply wasn’t enough.//
Lay/lie confusion.

>The floor opened to nothingness and my stomach jumped into my throat as I plummeted into a vast expanse.//

Comma between the clauses, and you've got a lot of sentences in a row here that start with the subject. It gets into a bit of a rut.

>alabaster colored//

Hyphenate.

>I tried to cry for help but there was no sound. I looked around but there was no place to look.//

Commas between the clauses.

>I could already see the light, it was approaching quickly from beneath me. I tried to get away but movement was impossible, my magic was useless and the light was getting closer… and closer.//

Yikes. Commas where they shouldn't be and none where there should.

>My limbs could move about but there was nothing to grab ahold of to avoid the inevitable//

Comma needed between the clauses.

>surveying my surroundings//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>I tried to move beyond it but I felt an invisible wall hold me back, keeping the fabric just beyond my reach.//

Comma.

>No, there was something else about this situation, it almost felt… unreal.//

That last comma is a splice.

>I couldn't quite place it but this place was so familiar… if//

Comma, and watch the close repetition of "place." And it doesn't make grammatical sense to have all that as one sentence, so capitalize the "if."

>I tried to kick at the invisible barrier but it was to no effect//

Comma.

>buking//

typo

>Even as I shouted I couldn't be certain that sound would travel beyond the boundary: it was blocking everything else I tried to do.//

Your frequent use of colons is really standing out. It's not that they're misused; it's that they're an unusual enough thing that they easily call attention to themselves. A couple for flavor can work fine, but when they start drawing my attention away from the story, that's a bad thing.

>real feeling//

Hyphenate.

>The curtain started to ripple more, it swayed faster, it's motions becoming more fluid.//

The first comma is a splice, and its/it's confusion.

>Beyond the curtain was yet, another curtain hanging from the ceiling//

There is no reason to have that comma there.

>A light flickered on and I saw another pony in the room//

Comma

>use to be//

used

>A feeling of dread washed over me//

Don't be so blunt. What thoughts run through her head? How does the realization manifest itself as physical sensations?

>She turned her head and I saw her wearing horn-rimmed glasses//

Comma

>this was my inspiration room//

Another thing you'd been doing a good job of until now. This paragraph alone has 9 instances of "was." "To be" verbs in general are very boring. Nothing happens. Unless you want the action to come to a complete standstill, you need to choose more active verbs.

>Rarity I’m bored.//

Comma for direct address.

>in a dream//

Redundant. You've already stated in the same sentence that it was a dream.

>Why don’t you go play with your friends Sweetie?” She said//

Comma for direct address, and speech tag capitalization. There's a section on the latter at top, too, under "dialogue punctuation/capitalization."

>It was a dreadfully difficult pattern to sew and I was behind as it was.//

Comma.

>I’m sorry Sweetie.//

Comma for direct address.

>She rolled it around on the floor then chase after it.//

Verb tenses.

>near by//

One word.

>The desk slammed against the curtain and the vase atop rocked back and forth//

Comma.

>Bu-but Rarity it was an accident.//

Comma for direct address.

>making it fell to the ground//

Typo

>More trips to the spa helped work not consuming me so much.//

Awkward phrasing.

>in the inspiration room//

Comma after this.

>There were some trees and dirt but where there should have been the rest Ponyville in the background//

Comma.

>there was only a grey backdrop; another curtain.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it.

>School had just let out and several colts and fillies came rushing out like stampeding buffalo. //

Comma

>None takin’//

taken

>“Sucks there’s no crusading today but oh well. Rarity said we are making cookies today.”//

There's nothing here to indicate what the girls are doing. They might as well be floating in a featureless void. Hae a look at the section on "talking heads."

>Ah’ll see ya tomorrow Sweetie!//

Comma for direct address.

>The school vanished out of view and the scenery moved along like a moving set on a stage.//

Comma

>Sweetie Belle cheerfully trotted down the road with an excited grin plastered on her face. Her bright green eyes shone with glee and she put a little extra bounce in her trot.//

A lot of telly language here with the cheerfully, excited, and glee.

>near by//

One word.

>lioness//

The way you've phrased this, it should be plural.

>The color drained out of her eyes and her smile faded as her trot slowed to a stop.//

Comma

>My heart plummeted, this looked like trouble.//

Comma splice.

>“Hey blank flank!” The silver colored one yelled.//

Comma for direct address, speech tag capitalization, silver-colored.

>“Oh, hi.” Sweetie Belle responded flatly.//

Dialogue punctuation.

>Sweetie Belle sighed, “yes my flank is blank. Now will you please move?”//

Dialogue capitalization, and it's awful hard to sigh all that. It makes for a poor speaking verb, unless the quote is very short.

>Yes, you are blank flank loser.//

Missing word(s).

>Granny Smith.” Diamond Tiara said//

>“Pathetic.” Silver Spoon sneered.//
>“Whatever, I don’t have time for this.” Sweetie Belle said.//
Dialogue punctuation.

>Sweetie Belle said. She tried to go around them again but they yet again blocked her.//

Comma and lose repetition of "again."

>You two are the one’s//

Why do you have an apostrophe there? It's just a plural, not a possessive.

>waiting for me walk by//

Missing word.

>in a mock baby voice//

Redundant. It's already evident by the way she said it.

>Sweetie Belle’s anger had vanished, her head drooped and her ears went flat.//

Comma splice.

>She didn’t cry but she stood in the same spot//

Comma

>her face seemingly troubled, like Diamond Tiara had gone too far//

This would be far more powerful if I could see it in her behavior instead of having the narrator draw the conclusion for me.

>If I ever see those two horrible brats again I will teach them a lesson.//

Comma

I'm barely halfway through, and I'm just seeing the same things over and over again. It should be obvious by now what needs attention. I'll continue on in case I find further plot or character issues, but you should have enough examples of these mechanical issues to find them on your own from now on.

>mom//

As a term of address or in place of a name, this would be capitalized.

>to great our parents//

typo

>as black as suit//

I guess you meant "soot"?

>SWEETIE!//

Italics are preferred over all caps or bold.

>Fighten’ solves nothin.//

Fightin' solves nothin'.

>all time//

Hyphenate.

>Yellow was empathy.//

This whole paragraph is overexplained. If you have to go through your symbolism in such detail, it probably didn't work. This could use a subtler treatment.

>she get’s right back up//

typo

>My beautiful sister, has the biggest heart//

Why in the world is that comma there?

>it’s me that’s taken care of her, it’s me that’s //

A person is a who, not a that.

>sniffeling//

sniffling

>laying//

Lay/lie confusion.

>horn emitted green sparks as she lowered her horn//

Repetitive

This is a common enough story concept that it needs to stand out by having a strong, heartfelt message delivered in a way that feels really authentic, so it's going to take some work to make that emotional connection and clean up the editing.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I watched the drapes flow gracefully in the gentle breeze, they were rising and falling listlessly without a care in the world.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;five mile//</span><br />Hyphenate the compound descriptor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;or is it me who will miss them being fillies//</span><br />I, not me. I guess it&#039;s your call as to whether Rarity knows that, since this is her thought, but she strikes me as the type who&#039;d use this type of grammar.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I had set my book aside after marking the page. Any second now Sweetie will come charging through that door to disrupt my peaceful afternoon.//</span><br />Your tense is wavering, and this isn&#039;t the only place it happens. &quot;Had set&quot; is a completed action in a past-tense narration, but &quot;will come charging&quot; is looking forward from a present-tense narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t stop her, or do anything to dissuade her.//</span><br />No need for that comma. It&#039;s all one clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What she doesn&#039;t realize is, some bruises aren&#039;t skin deep.//</span><br />These actually are (implied) separate clauses, but it&#039;s an arrangement that typically does&#039;t use a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoof steps//</span><br />One word, like footsteps.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It sounded like she was doing her best not to be heard.//</span><br />This is redundant and far less subtle than what you already said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I knocked on the door gently but she didn&#039;t answer.//</span><br />In this case, you do have multiple clauses, so put a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie was obviously upset and I needed to comfort her.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She gave the slightest of nods and I gazed into those watery, droopy green eyes.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Darling, please… <i>talk to me.&quot;</i>//</span><br />Terminate the italics before the quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I pleaded but it was in vain.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses. It seems like this will be a consistent thing. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions&quot; with a few examples.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her expression never changed: distant yet sad.//</span><br />You were doing fine before. It&#039;s better to demonstrate how she feels through the raw evidence of her actions and appearance. If the narration is adequate, I&#039;ll conclude on my own from your description that she&#039;s sad. When you get me to figure it out, I&#039;ll have a much closer connection to the character. There&#039;s a section on this, too: &quot;show versus tell.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She would rather to be alone.//</span><br />Extraneous &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh Sweetie Belle! What have they done to her? Why do they torment her so?//</span><br />Okay, you&#039;re laying it on thick here. Nothing kills authenticity like melodrama.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Who are you kidding Rarity?//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn&#039;t want to see the mascara running down my face like ink spilling from a broken pen.//</span><br />This is my first indication that she&#039;s been crying, so it comes up pretty suddenly. I wouldn&#039;t state it outright, but you should somehow hint when she starts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That will cheer her up and she can tell me what happened.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This. Is. The. Worst. Most. <i>Horrible</i>. Thing!</span><br />Okay, maybe I&#039;ll take back the thing about melodrama, if you&#039;re going to maintain this tone, but it does take away seriousness from Sweetie Belle&#039;s situation, and you haven&#039;t tagged it as comedy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;element of generosity//</span><br />I normally see that capitalized, and you need a comma after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lay down next to her//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But laying there simply wasn’t enough.//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The floor opened to nothingness and my stomach jumped into my throat as I plummeted into a vast expanse.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses, and you&#039;ve got a lot of sentences in a row here that start with the subject. It gets into a bit of a rut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;alabaster colored//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I tried to cry for help but there was no sound. I looked around but there was no place to look.//</span><br />Commas between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I could already see the light, it was approaching quickly from beneath me. I tried to get away but movement was impossible, my magic was useless and the light was getting closer… and closer.//</span><br />Yikes. Commas where they shouldn&#039;t be and none where there should.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My limbs could move about but there was nothing to grab ahold of to avoid the inevitable//</span><br />Comma needed between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;surveying my surroundings//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I tried to move beyond it but I felt an invisible wall hold me back, keeping the fabric just beyond my reach.//</span><br />Comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No, there was something else about this situation, it almost felt… unreal.//</span><br />That last comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I couldn&#039;t quite place it but this place was so familiar… if//</span><br />Comma, and watch the close repetition of &quot;place.&quot; And it doesn&#039;t make grammatical sense to have all that as one sentence, so capitalize the &quot;if.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I tried to kick at the invisible barrier but it was to no effect//</span><br />Comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;buking//</span><br />typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even as I shouted I couldn&#039;t be certain that sound would travel beyond the boundary: it was blocking everything else I tried to do.//</span><br />Your frequent use of colons is really standing out. It&#039;s not that they&#039;re misused; it&#039;s that they&#039;re an unusual enough thing that they easily call attention to themselves. A couple for flavor can work fine, but when they start drawing my attention away from the story, that&#039;s a bad thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;real feeling//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The curtain started to ripple more, it swayed faster, it&#039;s motions becoming more fluid.//</span><br />The first comma is a splice, and its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Beyond the curtain was yet, another curtain hanging from the ceiling//</span><br />There is no reason to have that comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A light flickered on and I saw another pony in the room//</span><br />Comma<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;use to be//</span><br />used<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A feeling of dread washed over me//</span><br />Don&#039;t be so blunt. What thoughts run through her head? How does the realization manifest itself as physical sensations?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned her head and I saw her wearing horn-rimmed glasses//</span><br />Comma<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this was my inspiration room//</span><br />Another thing you&#039;d been doing a good job of until now. This paragraph alone has 9 instances of &quot;was.&quot; &quot;To be&quot; verbs in general are very boring. Nothing happens. Unless you want the action to come to a complete standstill, you need to choose more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity I’m bored.//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in a dream//</span><br />Redundant. You&#039;ve already stated in the same sentence that it was a dream.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why don’t you go play with your friends Sweetie?” She said//</span><br />Comma for direct address, and speech tag capitalization. There&#039;s a section on the latter at top, too, under &quot;dialogue punctuation/capitalization.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a dreadfully difficult pattern to sew and I was behind as it was.//</span><br />Comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m sorry Sweetie.//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She rolled it around on the floor then chase after it.//</span><br />Verb tenses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;near by//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The desk slammed against the curtain and the vase atop rocked back and forth//</span><br />Comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bu-but Rarity it was an accident.//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;making it fell to the ground//</span><br />Typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;More trips to the spa helped work not consuming me so much.//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in the inspiration room//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There were some trees and dirt but where there should have been the rest Ponyville in the background//</span><br />Comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;there was only a grey backdrop; another curtain.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;School had just let out and several colts and fillies came rushing out like stampeding buffalo. //</span><br />Comma<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;None takin’//</span><br />taken<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Sucks there’s no crusading today but oh well. Rarity said we are making cookies today.”//</span><br />There&#039;s nothing here to indicate what the girls are doing. They might as well be floating in a featureless void. Hae a look at the section on &quot;talking heads.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah’ll see ya tomorrow Sweetie!//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The school vanished out of view and the scenery moved along like a moving set on a stage.//</span><br />Comma<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle cheerfully trotted down the road with an excited grin plastered on her face. Her bright green eyes shone with glee and she put a little extra bounce in her trot.//</span><br />A lot of telly language here with the cheerfully, excited, and glee.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;near by//</span><br />One word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lioness//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve phrased this, it should be plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The color drained out of her eyes and her smile faded as her trot slowed to a stop.//</span><br />Comma<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My heart plummeted, this looked like trouble.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Hey blank flank!” The silver colored one yelled.//</span><br />Comma for direct address, speech tag capitalization, silver-colored.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Oh, hi.” Sweetie Belle responded flatly.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle sighed, “yes my flank is blank. Now will you please move?”//</span><br />Dialogue capitalization, and it&#039;s awful hard to sigh all that. It makes for a poor speaking verb, unless the quote is very short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes, you are blank flank loser.//</span><br />Missing word(s).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Granny Smith.” Diamond Tiara said//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Pathetic.” Silver Spoon sneered.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Whatever, I don’t have time for this.” Sweetie Belle said.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle said. She tried to go around them again but they yet again blocked her.//</span><br />Comma and lose repetition of &quot;again.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You two are the one’s//</span><br />Why do you have an apostrophe there? It&#039;s just a plural, not a possessive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waiting for me walk by//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in a mock baby voice//</span><br />Redundant. It&#039;s already evident by the way she said it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle’s anger had vanished, her head drooped and her ears went flat.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t cry but she stood in the same spot//</span><br />Comma<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her face seemingly troubled, like Diamond Tiara had gone too far//</span><br />This would be far more powerful if I could see it in her behavior instead of having the narrator draw the conclusion for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I ever see those two horrible brats again I will teach them a lesson.//</span><br />Comma<br /><br />I&#039;m barely halfway through, and I&#039;m just seeing the same things over and over again. It should be obvious by now what needs attention. I&#039;ll continue on in case I find further plot or character issues, but you should have enough examples of these mechanical issues to find them on your own from now on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mom//</span><br />As a term of address or in place of a name, this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to great our parents//</span><br />typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as black as suit//</span><br />I guess you meant &quot;soot&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;SWEETIE!//</span><br />Italics are preferred over all caps or bold.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fighten’ solves nothin.//</span><br />Fightin&#039; solves nothin&#039;.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all time//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yellow was empathy.//</span><br />This whole paragraph is overexplained. If you have to go through your symbolism in such detail, it probably didn&#039;t work. This could use a subtler treatment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she get’s right back up//</span><br />typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My beautiful sister, has the biggest heart//</span><br />Why in the world is that comma there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s me that’s taken care of her, it’s me that’s //</span><br />A person is a who, not a that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sniffeling//</span><br />sniffling<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;horn emitted green sparks as she lowered her horn//</span><br />Repetitive<br /><br />This is a common enough story concept that it needs to stand out by having a strong, heartfelt message delivered in a way that feels really authentic, so it&#039;s going to take some work to make that emotional connection and clean up the editing.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 308

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The young were in each others forelegs, most of them whistling and flirting in the grass.//

each other's. Young what? Animals? Ponies? This is so out of context that I have no idea what I'm supposed to get from it.

>The birds in the boughs of trees singing each to each in blissful ignorance of the spectacle below.//

You've taken on a fairly grandiloquent tone, so if you intended this to be a fragment, it feels out of place. It sounds more conversational.

>Twilight and herself sat near the back.//

"Herself" isn't a pronoun you can use in the nominative case.

>and no trains were running for another week//

I guess they haven't done this in canon, but I can't imagine why there wouldn't be pegasus-drawn chariots that ponies other than royalty could use. Just a thought.

>and she had been there when Applejack//

You've mentioned so many female characters in the paragraph by now, and none that recently, for it to be clear who you meant by "she."

>world shattering//

Hyphenate.

>middle aged//

Hyphenate. You just got it right in the previous sentence… For that matter, why the repetition? It's not done in a way that there seems to be a point to it.

>wide open//

Hyphenate.

>and then they left.//

Comma to set off the dependent clause, and you're missing the space after the sentence.

>Once again, she//

And once again, I'm not sure who "she" is.

>To Twilight’s apparent surprise, she answered with a guffaw.//

Had this been an omniscient narrator or one in Twilight's perspective, this would be fine. But from Rarity's, it's backward. She wouldn't notice Twilight's surprise until after she'd guffawed, since it wouldn't happen until then. The wording doesn't say it's in that order, but you still want it to follow the perspective character's thought process so it feels natural.

>bigger city//

Hyphenate.

>You know, it’s terrible that I know//

Repetitive phrasing.

>I really don’t know//

And again in the very next sentence.

>Very wise of you, Twilight.//

This is something authors do wrong almost by reflex. You're not bad yet, but look how recently Rarity called her by name. Without thinking about it, many authors use direct address far too often in a conversation. But think about how often it actually happens when you're speaking one-on-one with a friend.

>Mr. Corner//

>Mr. Poets//
Well… which is it?

>Rarity sighed.//

This is the first indicator I've had in a while that these are real-breathing characters. They're pretty sparse here. Let me see what else they're doing while they talk. It adds a lot to the realism.

>whispy//

wispy

>Twilight seemed to consider them for a moment.//

How so? And watch how often you describe how things "seem." Vagueness gets old after a while. In a lot of these instances, you don't need to dither, because there's plenty of evidence as to how things are, not just how they seem. Keep this language when someone really is unsure.

>bookstore.I//

Missing space. Hm. These missing spaces might just throw your word count off an even 5000.

>just see the things you made and I just//

Repetition. This word in particular is one most authors need to keep an eye on. You only use 17 of them, but you do so in clusters.

>the mugs//

The use of "the" here really suggests they'd been mentioned before. It feels awkward.

>‘bout//

Backward apostrophe.

>when cider sale is on//

Feels like a missing word in there.

>scotch//

That's a proper noun.

>magicks//

Why in the world would you spell it that way? Is Rarity a hipster D&Der?

>“With the flood receding, have you had a chance to calculate your damages?”//

That just doesn't sound like natural dialogue. I get that Rarity doesn't have her heart in it, so she might not realize how tactless it sounds, but it also doesn't sound extemporaneous, more like a prepared speech.

>sat besides Rarity//

beside

>a better place for a new foal then a farm wagon//

then/than confusion

>The way that a painter notices with the intimacy a love can only emulate the existence of ripples and folds in a contextless, meaningless bit of cloth.//

That sentence just does not parse well at all. I can't figure out whether "the existence" is the direct object of "emulate" or "notices."

>headed home//

>headed back down the winding country road//
Close repetition.

>Rarity wondered what she thought//

So have her do so. It'd be much more illustrative than giving me the summary.

I'll give you the scene at Applejack's, because it did some nice mood setting, but I have to say, it seems pretty irrelevant from a plot standpoint. Nothing useful came of it, and Applejack has a tangential relationship at best to the story's events.

>and Rarity sighed//

Set this off with a comma.

>still growing//

Hyphenate.

>At the door to her home and business, Rarity opened the door//

Repetitive/redundant

>and by the time things had changed//

>But when I came back//
>but as I grew and calmed down//
Comma for the dependent clause.

>took another sip, taking//

Repetitive. And note that "taking a sip" is the default action that writers use over and over again for characters drinking. It's become cliched.

>swish the cool wine in her mouth//

You just had her swish it in her glass a bit ago. Watch the repetition.

>Rarity took another sip, taking the time to taste and swish the cool wine in her mouth before letting it go, picking out the different notes of flavor that made a beautiful chord.//

Okay, let's review that sentence again, for sequencing this time. Remember that participles mean that things happen simultaneously. So she takes a sip. While taking that sip, she tastes and swishes the wine around. Probably should happen in sequence, but it's enough of a gray area to let it slide. After this, she lets go, at the same time as she picks out the flavors. Seems like this last part would go with the tasting and swishing, but you've already broken it out of the timeline with the "before."

>They say she left without saying//

Repetition. You could just go without that "saying."

>and the last big order from Canterlot had gone predictably south//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>scotch//

Capitalize

>radiant…” she faltered.//

That's not a speaking verb.

>Twilight seemed taken aback.//

How so? And this is getting talking heads again.

>and it was quite fun//

>when it’s put that way//
Comma for the dependent clause.

>there isn’t anyone on the other side of the page//

I rather disagree with this. Not that it wouldn't be a genuine sentiment from Rarity's standpoint, but I'm surprised Twilight doesn't contest it in any way. She's very knowledgeable about the value in printed matter, after all.

>its worth something//

Its/it's confusion.

>and her horn lit as she fought briefly with a tangle in Twilight’s mane//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>near fatal//

Hyphenate

>and she says you do it to her too.//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>You know, Twilight//

You're getting back into using direct address more than what would feel authentic.

>happy with her work//

Show me. A little narrative comment on it would work great.

>It makes me happy, Twilight//

See previous point about direct address.

>he told me that what I did mattered al lot, Twilight.//

stahp. Typo in there, too.

>if I really felt this way//

Comma after this for the dependent clause.

>at least he cared Twilight//

Missing comma for (yet more) direct address.

I can't help but think there was an easy way to make Applejack's scene mean something to this narrative. I'm also surprised how much Twilight sits back and waits for Rarity to reason her own conundrum out. I mean, there's value in doing so, but it didn't feel engineered on Twilight's behalf, more like she was being completely oblivious and lucked into saying the right things. I pointed out how I was surprised she didn't refute Rarity's opinion about the writings of dead people. But she also could have pointed out how Applejack is in much the same stuation. Rarity had a great appreciation of nature at the farm, and yet that is all temporary, too. The sunset lasts but a moment. The trees drop their leaves in the fall. The apples will rot on the ground. Except that some good comes of it. The sun and the trees will be renewed in their time. The apples are necessary for ponies to live and grow. Applejack accepts that in a very fundamental way that seems to head off even the possibility of an existential crisis. Maybe Rarity can't force herself to be that pragmatic, but she could at least follow the argument. Ponies need beauty, too. Maybe a particular poem or dress is insignificant, but the existence of them at all brings joy to many people.

So, what was my point? Well… Bottom line is that I think there's some unrefined ore here that could make for a richer discussion in general, but also because Twilight is so oblivious and Applejack so irrelevant that they barely play a role in the story.

That said, it may just be me, and I certainly can't require perfection (or my definition of it) to accept a story for posting. In short, fix the other issues, and I'll approve it. but at least give this part some serious thought as well, even if you decide it's not something you want to change.

Oh, and I had no idea what was meant by the wife's departure, but I'm pretty thick at reading between the lines.

When you're ready to resubmit, please select the "back from Mars" option.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The young were in each others forelegs, most of them whistling and flirting in the grass.//</span><br />each other&#039;s. Young what? Animals? Ponies? This is so out of context that I have no idea what I&#039;m supposed to get from it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The birds in the boughs of trees singing each to each in blissful ignorance of the spectacle below.//</span><br />You&#039;ve taken on a fairly grandiloquent tone, so if you intended this to be a fragment, it feels out of place. It sounds more conversational.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight and herself sat near the back.//</span><br />&quot;Herself&quot; isn&#039;t a pronoun you can use in the nominative case.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and no trains were running for another week//</span><br />I guess they haven&#039;t done this in canon, but I can&#039;t imagine why there wouldn&#039;t be pegasus-drawn chariots that ponies other than royalty could use. Just a thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she had been there when Applejack//</span><br />You&#039;ve mentioned so many female characters in the paragraph by now, and none that recently, for it to be clear who you meant by &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;world shattering//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;middle aged//</span><br />Hyphenate. You just got it right in the previous sentence… For that matter, why the repetition? It&#039;s not done in a way that there seems to be a point to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wide open//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and then they left.//</span><br />Comma to set off the dependent clause, and you&#039;re missing the space after the sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once again, she//</span><br />And once again, I&#039;m not sure who &quot;she&quot; is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;To Twilight’s apparent surprise, she answered with a guffaw.//</span><br />Had this been an omniscient narrator or one in Twilight&#039;s perspective, this would be fine. But from Rarity&#039;s, it&#039;s backward. She wouldn&#039;t notice Twilight&#039;s surprise until after she&#039;d guffawed, since it wouldn&#039;t happen until then. The wording doesn&#039;t say it&#039;s in that order, but you still want it to follow the perspective character&#039;s thought process so it feels natural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bigger city//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You know, it’s terrible that I know//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I really don’t know//</span><br />And again in the very next sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Very wise of you, Twilight.//</span><br />This is something authors do wrong almost by reflex. You&#039;re not bad yet, but look how recently Rarity called her by name. Without thinking about it, many authors use direct address far too often in a conversation. But think about how often it actually happens when you&#039;re speaking one-on-one with a friend.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mr. Corner//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mr. Poets//</span><br />Well… which is it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity sighed.//</span><br />This is the first indicator I&#039;ve had in a while that these are real-breathing characters. They&#039;re pretty sparse here. Let me see what else they&#039;re doing while they talk. It adds a lot to the realism.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whispy//</span><br />wispy<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight seemed to consider them for a moment.//</span><br />How so? And watch how often you describe how things &quot;seem.&quot; Vagueness gets old after a while. In a lot of these instances, you don&#039;t need to dither, because there&#039;s plenty of evidence as to how things are, not just how they seem. Keep this language when someone really is unsure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bookstore.I//</span><br />Missing space. Hm. These missing spaces might just throw your word count off an even 5000.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just see the things you made and I just//</span><br />Repetition. This word in particular is one most authors need to keep an eye on. You only use 17 of them, but you do so in clusters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the mugs//</span><br />The use of &quot;the&quot; here really suggests they&#039;d been mentioned before. It feels awkward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘bout//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when cider sale is on//</span><br />Feels like a missing word in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scotch//</span><br />That&#039;s a proper noun.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;magicks//</span><br />Why in the world would you spell it that way? Is Rarity a hipster D&amp;Der?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“With the flood receding, have you had a chance to calculate your damages?”//</span><br />That just doesn&#039;t sound like natural dialogue. I get that Rarity doesn&#039;t have her heart in it, so she might not realize how tactless it sounds, but it also doesn&#039;t sound extemporaneous, more like a prepared speech.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sat besides Rarity//</span><br />beside<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a better place for a new foal then a farm wagon//</span><br />then/than confusion<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The way that a painter notices with the intimacy a love can only emulate the existence of ripples and folds in a contextless, meaningless bit of cloth.//</span><br />That sentence just does not parse well at all. I can&#039;t figure out whether &quot;the existence&quot; is the direct object of &quot;emulate&quot; or &quot;notices.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;headed home//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;headed back down the winding country road//</span><br />Close repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity wondered what she thought//</span><br />So have her do so. It&#039;d be much more illustrative than giving me the summary.<br /><br />I&#039;ll give you the scene at Applejack&#039;s, because it did some nice mood setting, but I have to say, it seems pretty irrelevant from a plot standpoint. Nothing useful came of it, and Applejack has a tangential relationship at best to the story&#039;s events.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and Rarity sighed//</span><br />Set this off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still growing//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At the door to her home and business, Rarity opened the door//</span><br />Repetitive/redundant<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and by the time things had changed//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But when I came back//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but as I grew and calmed down//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;took another <abbr title="Sleepless in Ponyville">sip</abbr>, taking//</span><br />Repetitive. And note that &quot;taking a <abbr title="Sleepless in Ponyville">sip</abbr>&quot; is the default action that writers use over and over again for characters drinking. It&#039;s become cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;swish the cool wine in her mouth//</span><br />You just had her swish it in her glass a bit ago. Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity took another <abbr title="Sleepless in Ponyville">sip</abbr>, taking the time to taste and swish the cool wine in her mouth before letting it go, picking out the different notes of flavor that made a beautiful chord.//</span><br />Okay, let&#039;s review that sentence again, for sequencing this time. Remember that participles mean that things happen simultaneously. So she takes a <abbr title="Sleepless in Ponyville">sip</abbr>. While taking that <abbr title="Sleepless in Ponyville">sip</abbr>, she tastes and swishes the wine around. Probably should happen in sequence, but it&#039;s enough of a gray area to let it slide. After this, she lets go, at the same time as she picks out the flavors. Seems like this last part would go with the tasting and swishing, but you&#039;ve already broken it out of the timeline with the &quot;before.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They say she left without saying//</span><br />Repetition. You could just go without that &quot;saying.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and the last big order from Canterlot had gone predictably south//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scotch//</span><br />Capitalize<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;radiant…” she faltered.//</span><br />That&#039;s not a speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight seemed taken aback.//</span><br />How so? And this is getting talking heads again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and it was quite fun//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when it’s put that way//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;there isn’t anyone on the other side of the page//</span><br />I rather disagree with this. Not that it wouldn&#039;t be a genuine sentiment from Rarity&#039;s standpoint, but I&#039;m surprised Twilight doesn&#039;t contest it in any way. She&#039;s very knowledgeable about the value in printed matter, after all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its worth something//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and her horn lit as she fought briefly with a tangle in Twilight’s mane//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;near fatal//</span><br />Hyphenate<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she says you do it to her too.//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You know, Twilight//</span><br />You&#039;re getting back into using direct address more than what would feel authentic.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;happy with her work//</span><br />Show me. A little narrative comment on it would work great.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It makes me happy, Twilight//</span><br />See previous point about direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he told me that what I did mattered al lot, Twilight.//</span><br />stahp. Typo in there, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if I really felt this way//</span><br />Comma after this for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at least he cared Twilight//</span><br />Missing comma for (yet more) direct address.<br /><br />I can&#039;t help but think there was an easy way to make Applejack&#039;s scene mean something to this narrative. I&#039;m also surprised how much Twilight sits back and waits for Rarity to reason her own conundrum out. I mean, there&#039;s value in doing so, but it didn&#039;t feel engineered on Twilight&#039;s behalf, more like she was being completely oblivious and lucked into saying the right things. I pointed out how I was surprised she didn&#039;t refute Rarity&#039;s opinion about the writings of dead people. But she also could have pointed out how Applejack is in much the same stuation. Rarity had a great appreciation of nature at the farm, and yet that is all temporary, too. The sunset lasts but a moment. The trees drop their leaves in the fall. The apples will rot on the ground. Except that some good comes of it. The sun and the trees will be renewed in their time. The apples are necessary for ponies to live and grow. Applejack accepts that in a very fundamental way that seems to head off even the possibility of an existential crisis. Maybe Rarity can&#039;t force herself to be that pragmatic, but she could at least follow the argument. Ponies need beauty, too. Maybe a particular poem or dress is insignificant, but the existence of them at all brings joy to many people.<br /><br />So, what was my point? Well… Bottom line is that I think there&#039;s some unrefined ore here that could make for a richer discussion in general, but also because Twilight is so oblivious and Applejack so irrelevant that they barely play a role in the story.<br /><br />That said, it may just be me, and I certainly can&#039;t require perfection (or my definition of it) to accept a story for posting. In short, fix the other issues, and I&#039;ll approve it. but at least give this part some serious thought as well, even if you decide it&#039;s not something you want to change.<br /><br />Oh, and I had no idea what was meant by the wife&#039;s departure, but I&#039;m pretty thick at reading between the lines.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Sun, Nov 23rd, 2014 22:30</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 309

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>the only pony that could save her//
A pony is a "who," not a "that."

Story:
>I thought back of my grandmother.//
Ah, I see from the comments you're German. I'll try to help as much as I can. One of the toughest things to learn in any foreign language is what prepositions go with which expressions. Here, it'd be typical to use "to" or possibly "on" instead of "of."

>Sorry grandma,//

Direct address takes commas on both sides, and when used as a term of address, "Grandma" would be capitalized.

>uncareful//

Awkward word choice. "Careless" would sound more natural.

>my lack of full attention of what I was doing//

"to" or "on," not "of" what I was doing.

>inaudible minimum of moving air//

If she can't hear it, then why is she telling me about it? It suggests that she's giving the matter a lot of thought, which is a really strange place for her musings to go.

>The sky was truly a sight that night.//

If this was all, I could ignore it, but then we get this:
>There wasn’t any artificial light in sight//
>the night village//
>spotlights//
So we get quite a bit of repetition all in that same paragraph, and worse yet, so much of it rhymes. Especially those first two examples, where the rhyming words appear so close together. For one, it gets distracting. I start musing to myself about how much rhyme there is, and that pulls me away from the story. For another, rhyme creates an effect. You may not intend anything by it, but it still does. Like I said, the first one could have passed by with little notice, but when it keeps happening, it makes this light, possibly humorous, and thet's not the tone you're trying to create in this scene. It's working against you.

>plants that surrounded me expressed an air of calmness that surrounded me//

And you've directly repeated "that surrounded me" in the same sentence.

>A serpentine offering.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. "Serpentine" usually means winding, though I get the impression from this phrasing that you mean it more literally of the snake, as in tempting but harmful. But see the confusion that easily results from using unusual definitions or pretty opaque metaphors. In fact, I've found the word choice pretty inconsistent so far, at times favoring the most complex synonym possible for a word, and at other times very simple. There are reasons such a thing could be done, but I don't see the mood changing in the narration to coincide with that.

>it was clear just from the way they acted//

So how did they act? It'll have a lot more impact if I get to see it, especially since their reaction seems to be important to the narrator.

>That fact was underlined//

I think the word choice here is fairly appropriate, and not in a good way. This is stated as a fact. But how does the narrator feel about it? She may wish to keep her feelings inside, but the narrator is inside. If you suppress even the internal reaction, it's very hard to keep things interesting. It'll end up reading like an academic paper or a historical account, not a story.

>My own expressing//

expression

>I could make out//

Pretty much the same phrasing you used in the previous description.

>He was either tired or annoyed.//

What's the difference to her? If she cares, then she'll keep trying to figure it out. If she doesn't, then why is she trying to read all these ponies? The description that precedes this is good, though: it gives me the physical description without feeding me a conclusion.

>to begin imagine//

Missing a "to."

>I was glad to see the security//

In this usage, you don't need "the."

>“He kinda has a point, though,” I suddenly heard a mare say,//

Minor thing, but it's much more effective if you can get across a sense of suddenness without actually using the word.

>the leaving drunk guy//

Awkward phrasing.

>mhm’d//

mhmed

>The whole information//

Just use "everything" here. It sounds much more natural.

>the exact events of what would happen from there on//

Awkward phrasing.

>rejected to compute//

Awkward phrasing.

>When I fully came back to myself//

You'll most often set off a dependent clause with a comma.

>the grills chirping their melodies//

I have no idea what you were trying to say, so I can only suggest that "grills" might not be the word you were looking for. I can't think of anything close in spelling or meaning that makes sense, so I'm lost.

>I’ve been missing//

She's speaking in past tense normally, so a present participle is out of place. "I'd been missing."

>I can’t, grandma//

Capitalization.

>I’ve been young too, many years ago.//

Verb tense again. The "I've been" suggests that she still is young.

>as my eyes took their time to adjust to the moonlit night, as they tried to make out where the question came from.//

It's really clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence like this, especially one after the other. Besides being repetitive, they have a redundant function: to synchronize actions. Combine them into one: "as my eyes took their time to adjust to the moonlit night and tried to make out where the question came from."

>They came to halt//

They came to a halt

>everything okay//

Missing a verb.

>parkbench//

That's two words.

>louder than I intentioned//

intended

>My mind was like it was thrown in the fire//

Awkward phrasing.

>But just as it was about to finish finding a petty excuse to vent at someone//

What does "it" refer to here? Are you sure you didn't mean "I"? Also, this paragraph is very factual, the same problem as before. There are times even a third-person narrator should do so, but especially for a first-person narrator, the delivery needs to reflect the character's mood. The dialogue sounds like that in the previous paragraph. Make the narration have the same feeling in it.

>she whispered into my ears//

Both of them?

>my face buried itself into her soft fur//

There are times it works, but beware of attributing actions to body parts. In this case, it undercuts the emotion that made her choose to do so by just claiming it happened for some reason beyond her control.

>I was in the save embrace//

safe

>bring a warming light into the cold hall inside me. A light that illuminated the entire room.//

Note the odd mixed metaphor where a hall becomes a room.

>and neither did I.//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>She didn’t even ask what the matter is, she just noticed that I wasn’t feeling well.//

Verb tense problem and a comma splice.

>And yet now she was stroking my mane and let her mane get drenched//

Inconsistent verb forms and repetition of "mane."

>As I finished comprehending the full meaning of this//

Very cold and factual again. Let me see her thought process. Let me see how she figures it out and what it means to her.

>At the peak of my guffaw//

Odd phrasing.

>I might’ve broken some bones of her//

Awkward phrasing.

>I laughed and eased the grip around her.//

"My," not "the."

>It looked like it became much more beautiful in the meantime//

Way too vague and short to carry much meaning. Let her muse about it a bit.

>All I did was silently thanking the stars for the moment.//

Verb form.

>As though I was packed by strings//

I have no idea what you meant to say here, but this doesn't make sense.

>I put my cello onto its stand//

On. "Onto" implies being on top of something. If I remember my German correctly, it's the difference between "an" and "auf," though Germans might use the opposite sense than English does.

>When I was at your age//

Comma for the dependent clause, and that "at" is extraneous.

>a unusual//

an

>learning progress//

Awkward phrasing.

>an barely//

a

>and got away from the mare again//

Missing a subject for this clause.

>“If I may ask, why did you not want to hear the reason why I was sad? You just blindly accepted my situation and took me into your embrace.”//

They were in a very spontaneous moment, yet this dialogue sounds so formal as to seem rehearsed. It doesn't feel natural for the moment at all. In fact, that goes for this entire conversation.

>what they could’ve made differently//

Typically, "done," not "made."

>I already wanted to so//

Missing word.

>Am I daydreaming? Hallucinating?//

I don't get the difference between why she would say this out loud while keeping the thoughts in the previous paragraph internal.

>something else made click in my head//

Missing word at least, but odd phrasing.

>This pony, whoever it was, has given me the comfort I needed//

Verb tense.

>to not fall into complete despair//

Not to. And there never really was a moment where Octavia figured things out. You mentioned a "click," but you left it up to the reader to vocalize what that realization was. Let me see her thought process. The whole point of the story is for her to learn this lesson, and as it is, I have to invent that moment myself.

>It’s because that one//

Syntax is off here.

I don't see any problems of a story or character nature, which are generally the tougher ones to fix. There are the usual wording and phrasing problems I'd expect of a non-native speaker, so it'll take finding someone very familiar with the language who is willing to be very thorough and point out anything that sounds funny to him. My only other big issue is that the story's key emotional moments tend to be glossed over and kept very factual in the narration, which really lessens the impact they can have.

Also look at the sheer number of times you use the word "just." 29 times in a little over 2800 words. That's quite often.

There's a link near the top of this thread to the Omnibus, which contains writing tips and links to reviewing resources.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the only pony that could save her//</span><br />A pony is a &quot;who,&quot; not a &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I thought back of my grandmother.//</span><br />Ah, I see from the comments you&#039;re German. I&#039;ll try to help as much as I can. One of the toughest things to learn in any foreign language is what prepositions go with which expressions. Here, it&#039;d be typical to use &quot;to&quot; or possibly &quot;on&quot; instead of &quot;of.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sorry grandma,//</span><br />Direct address takes commas on both sides, and when used as a term of address, &quot;Grandma&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;uncareful//</span><br />Awkward word choice. &quot;Careless&quot; would sound more natural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my lack of full attention of what I was doing//</span><br />&quot;to&quot; or &quot;on,&quot; not &quot;of&quot; what I was doing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;inaudible minimum of moving air//</span><br />If she can&#039;t hear it, then why is she telling me about it? It suggests that she&#039;s giving the matter a lot of thought, which is a really strange place for her musings to go.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sky was truly a sight that night.//</span><br />If this was all, I could ignore it, but then we get this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There wasn’t any artificial light in sight//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the night village//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spotlights//</span><br />So we get quite a bit of repetition all in that same paragraph, and worse yet, so much of it rhymes. Especially those first two examples, where the rhyming words appear so close together. For one, it gets distracting. I start musing to myself about how much rhyme there is, and that pulls me away from the story. For another, rhyme creates an effect. You may not intend anything by it, but it still does. Like I said, the first one could have passed by with little notice, but when it keeps happening, it makes this light, possibly humorous, and thet&#039;s not the tone you&#039;re trying to create in this scene. It&#039;s working against you.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;plants that surrounded me expressed an air of calmness that surrounded me//</span><br />And you&#039;ve directly repeated &quot;that surrounded me&quot; in the same sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A serpentine offering.//</span><br />I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. &quot;Serpentine&quot; usually means winding, though I get the impression from this phrasing that you mean it more literally of the snake, as in tempting but harmful. But see the confusion that easily results from using unusual definitions or pretty opaque metaphors. In fact, I&#039;ve found the word choice pretty inconsistent so far, at times favoring the most complex synonym possible for a word, and at other times very simple. There are reasons such a thing could be done, but I don&#039;t see the mood changing in the narration to coincide with that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it was clear just from the way they acted//</span><br />So how <i>did</i> they act? It&#039;ll have a lot more impact if I get to see it, especially since their reaction seems to be important to the narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That fact was underlined//</span><br />I think the word choice here is fairly appropriate, and not in a good way. This is stated as a fact. But how does the narrator feel about it? She may wish to keep her feelings inside, but the narrator <i>is</i> inside. If you suppress even the internal reaction, it&#039;s very hard to keep things interesting. It&#039;ll end up reading like an academic paper or a historical account, not a story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My own expressing//</span><br />expression<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I could make out//</span><br />Pretty much the same phrasing you used in the previous description.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was either tired or annoyed.//</span><br />What&#039;s the difference to her? If she cares, then she&#039;ll keep trying to figure it out. If she doesn&#039;t, then why is she trying to read all these ponies? The description that precedes this is good, though: it gives me the physical description without feeding me a conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to begin imagine//</span><br />Missing a &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was glad to see the security//</span><br />In this usage, you don&#039;t need &quot;the.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“He kinda has a point, though,” I suddenly heard a mare say,//</span><br />Minor thing, but it&#039;s much more effective if you can get across a sense of suddenness without actually using the word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the leaving drunk guy//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mhm’d//</span><br /><i>mhm</i>ed<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The whole information//</span><br />Just use &quot;everything&quot; here. It sounds much more natural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the exact events of what would happen from there on//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rejected to compute//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I fully came back to myself//</span><br />You&#039;ll most often set off a dependent clause with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the grills chirping their melodies//</span><br />I have no idea what you were trying to say, so I can only suggest that &quot;grills&quot; might not be the word you were looking for. I can&#039;t think of anything close in spelling or meaning that makes sense, so I&#039;m lost.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve been missing//</span><br />She&#039;s speaking in past tense normally, so a present participle is out of place. &quot;I&#039;d been missing.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can’t, grandma//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve been young too, many years ago.//</span><br />Verb tense again. The &quot;I&#039;ve been&quot; suggests that she still is young.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as my eyes took their time to adjust to the moonlit night, as they tried to make out where the question came from.//</span><br />It&#039;s really clunky to have two &quot;as&quot; clauses in the same sentence like this, especially one after the other. Besides being repetitive, they have a redundant function: to synchronize actions. Combine them into one: &quot;as my eyes took their time to adjust to the moonlit night and tried to make out where the question came from.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They came to halt//</span><br />They came to a halt<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;everything okay//</span><br />Missing a verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;parkbench//</span><br />That&#039;s two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;louder than I intentioned//</span><br />intended<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My mind was like it was thrown in the fire//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But just as it was about to finish finding a petty excuse to vent at someone//</span><br />What does &quot;it&quot; refer to here? Are you sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;I&quot;? Also, this paragraph is very factual, the same problem as before. There are times even a third-person narrator should do so, but especially for a first-person narrator, the delivery needs to reflect the character&#039;s mood. The dialogue sounds like that in the previous paragraph. Make the narration have the same feeling in it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she whispered into my ears//</span><br />Both of them?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my face buried itself into her soft fur//</span><br />There are times it works, but beware of attributing actions to body parts. In this case, it undercuts the emotion that made her choose to do so by just claiming it happened for some reason beyond her control.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was in the save embrace//</span><br />safe<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bring a warming light into the cold hall inside me. A light that illuminated the entire room.//</span><br />Note the odd mixed metaphor where a hall becomes a room.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and neither did I.//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t even ask what the matter is, she just noticed that I wasn’t feeling well.//</span><br />Verb tense problem and a comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And yet now she was stroking my mane and let her mane get drenched//</span><br />Inconsistent verb forms and repetition of &quot;mane.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As I finished comprehending the full meaning of this//</span><br />Very cold and factual again. Let me see her thought process. Let me see how she figures it out and what it means to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At the peak of my guffaw//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I might’ve broken some bones of her//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I laughed and eased the grip around her.//</span><br />&quot;My,&quot; not &quot;the.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It looked like it became much more beautiful in the meantime//</span><br />Way too vague and short to carry much meaning. Let her muse about it a bit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All I did was silently thanking the stars for the moment.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As though I was packed by strings//</span><br />I have no idea what you meant to say here, but this doesn&#039;t make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I put my cello onto its stand//</span><br />On. &quot;Onto&quot; implies being on top of something. If I remember my German correctly, it&#039;s the difference between &quot;an&quot; and &quot;auf,&quot; though Germans might use the opposite sense than English does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I was at your age//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause, and that &quot;at&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a unusual//</span><br />an<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;learning progress//</span><br />Awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an barely//</span><br />a<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and got away from the mare again//</span><br />Missing a subject for this clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“If I may ask, why did you not want to hear the reason why I was sad? You just blindly accepted my situation and took me into your embrace.”//</span><br />They were in a very spontaneous moment, yet this dialogue sounds so formal as to seem rehearsed. It doesn&#039;t feel natural for the moment at all. In fact, that goes for this entire conversation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;what they could’ve made differently//</span><br />Typically, &quot;done,&quot; not &quot;made.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I already wanted to so//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Am I daydreaming? Hallucinating?//</span><br />I don&#039;t get the difference between why she would say this out loud while keeping the thoughts in the previous paragraph internal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something else made click in my head//</span><br />Missing word at least, but odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This pony, whoever it was, has given me the comfort I needed//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to not fall into complete despair//</span><br />Not to. And there never really was a moment where Octavia figured things out. You mentioned a &quot;click,&quot; but you left it up to the reader to vocalize what that realization was. Let me see her thought process. The whole point of the story is for her to learn this lesson, and as it is, I have to invent that moment myself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s because that one//</span><br />Syntax is off here.<br /><br />I don&#039;t see any problems of a story or character nature, which are generally the tougher ones to fix. There are the usual wording and phrasing problems I&#039;d expect of a non-native speaker, so it&#039;ll take finding someone very familiar with the language who is willing to be very thorough and point out anything that sounds funny to him. My only other big issue is that the story&#039;s key emotional moments tend to be glossed over and kept very factual in the narration, which really lessens the impact they can have.<br /><br />Also look at the sheer number of times you use the word &quot;just.&quot; 29 times in a little over 2800 words. That&#039;s quite often.<br /><br />There&#039;s a link near the top of this thread to the Omnibus, which contains writing tips and links to reviewing resources.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Nov 25th, 2014 15:52</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 310

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Routine made us wake up, everyday//

In this usage, "every day" really needs to be two words.

>now - a//

Please use proper dashes for interruptions and asides. Hyphens are for stuttering and certain compound words and phrases.

>Shadows lifted themselves from the furniture, washed out by a nauseating brightness and saturation. The decrepit walls were replaced by well-maintained, navy blue cumulus; expensive products lined new shelves, complemented by pictures I never placed up.//

I'll level with you. The prose here doesn't make sense for the character, but it's entertaining enough that I can let it slide. So I'm not going to make you change it, but I at least want you to understand. There's a lot of fancy word choice you've used so far. This is just an example. I wouldn't expect a police officer to speak like this, for one. But the major point is that I certainly wouldn't expect this kind of language from someone suffering a hangover. It's a very subjective narration, so the tone needs to match the character's mood and situation. Frankly, it doesn't here.

>Completely disoriented, I trotted to the door. What I saw along the way – what I saw just now – did not even register.//

Here's more of what I'm talking about. If she's that disoriented, then shouldn't the narration sound like she is? And if it didn't register, how does she know to say it?

>What- What//

Dash, please, and you don't need to capitalize after it.

>For the love of-. How//

Use a dash, the period is extraneous, and you don't need to capitalize after it.

>quote, ‘the//

Capitalize the start of the quote.

>Fillydelphia’ end quote//

Needs a comma.

Note that your paragraph indentations are very uneven. That can result from importing something rather than pasting it into FiMFic. Frankly, since you're leaving space between paragraphs, you don't need to indent.

>less it disappear just as suddenly//

lest

>Pulsant - it//

Dash, please. Suffice it to say you need to scan through the story for these.

>Listen Solar W-…//

>So, you have a-… you’re//
That punctuation combination is mutually exclusive.

>his misty eyes had already fold//

Verb form.

>James Joyce//

Where in the world is this coming from? I mean, I see where you're taking the story, but this is pretty sudden.

>A click ahead//

Usually spelled "klick" for a measure of distance.

>directly across it//

Missing a "from."

>fella'//

No reason for that apostrophe. It's an imitative spelling, not an elision.

>15//

Spell out numbers this short.

>Donny!-//

A dash would come before an exclamation mark or question mark.

>BANG.//

You don't need sound effects in the narration. Just describe the sound.

>but it was nothing that was already experienced//

Are you sure this is the way you meant to phrase it? It doesn't quite make sense.

>Do you hear that-.” Her question slurred and trailed off//

Extraneous period, and you've contradicted yourself. A dash doesn't indicate trailing off.

>The underboss was all that laid between me and Lightning Bolt.//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Dumb-bell//

You'd been capitalizing both parts.

>something?…//

Question mark goes after the ellipsis.

>Woah//

How is it that so many people can't spell such a simple word?

>detective Fleetfoot//

In this usage, "Detective" would be capitalized.

>soot grey//

Hyphenate.

>leather coat//

As in "she wears the skins of dead sentient cows" leather?

>saturday//

Capitalize.

>döppelganger//

The umlaut goes over the "a."

>miss Fleetfoot//

Inconsistent with how you capitalized it before.

>The sergeant began a gallant trot down west wing.//

Missing word.

>outside my peripheral//

Her peripheral what?

>taking a mouthful of Earth//

Lower case, since you presumably don't mean our planet specifically.

>700 miles per hour//

Spell it out. And it's an odd mix, since you used meters earlier in the story.

>The rain was back in full force, taking away the warmth I had felt in that field with my daughter and Soarin. Once again, I was alone on Roscoe Street, excluding the pony currently bashing my head in. Another punch across the same cheek made fissures out of the cracks that were there before. All my senses became discombobulated, leaving me unable to do anything more than observe my own murder.//

Again, the narration doesn't match what's happening. It doesn't sound concussed at all, and it's noticing details she wouldn't be able to.

>just, just//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses.

>His voice was as a grand piano as euphonious//

That second "as" doesn't quite parse.

>No budge.//

Odd word choice.

>within my peripheral//

Again, her peripheral what?

>say-.//

Extraneous period.

>wonderbolt//

Capitalize.

>tied up//

Hyphenate.

>The bind slackened.//

"Binding" or "bond" would work better. This has a different connotation.

>pearl white//

Hyphenate. And pearls aren't very white. The phrase "pearly whites" refers to the luster, not the color.

I like the mood of this story. There are a few pervasive issues, like dash use and how you combine dashes with other punctuation. Mostly, though, I'm going to urge you strongly again to reconsider some of the narrative voicing. You did a good job of changing the pacing during action scenes, for instance. So why wouldn't you adjust the narration to reflect her frame of mind when she's drunk or concussed? It's a little too cohesive and with a little too advanced vocabulary to feel like it accommodates what's happening. I see that one commenter complained about the tough words, too. I don't think it's so much of an issue for reader understanding, but more that it makes the story very uneven. She pops out one of these advanced words every once in a while, but she also uses a lot of vernacular, which would seem to fit her character better. So when she does open the dictionary, it jumps out at me as being out of place.

When you're ready to resubmit, please choose the "back from Mars" option. In a break from the usual way of doing things, I'd like a different pre-reader to look over it then, but I will try to expedite the process so you don't wait in the queue for weeks.

And if this story is going where I think it is, it reminds me a little of this one: http://www.fimfiction.net/story/23731/author-author
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Routine made us wake up, everyday//</span><br />In this usage, &quot;every day&quot; really needs to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now - a//</span><br />Please use proper dashes for interruptions and asides. Hyphens are for stuttering and certain compound words and phrases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shadows lifted themselves from the furniture, washed out by a nauseating brightness and saturation. The decrepit walls were replaced by well-maintained, navy blue cumulus; expensive products lined new shelves, complemented by pictures I never placed up.//</span><br />I&#039;ll level with you. The prose here doesn&#039;t make sense for the character, but it&#039;s entertaining enough that I can let it slide. So I&#039;m not going to make you change it, but I at least want you to understand. There&#039;s a lot of fancy word choice you&#039;ve used so far. This is just an example. I wouldn&#039;t expect a police officer to speak like this, for one. But the major point is that I certainly wouldn&#039;t expect this kind of language from someone suffering a hangover. It&#039;s a very subjective narration, so the tone needs to match the character&#039;s mood and situation. Frankly, it doesn&#039;t here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Completely disoriented, I trotted to the door. What I saw along the way – what I saw just now – did not even register.//</span><br />Here&#039;s more of what I&#039;m talking about. If she&#039;s that disoriented, then shouldn&#039;t the narration sound like she is? And if it didn&#039;t register, how does she know to say it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What- What//</span><br />Dash, please, and you don&#039;t need to capitalize after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For the love of-. How//</span><br />Use a dash, the period is extraneous, and you don&#039;t need to capitalize after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quote, ‘the//</span><br />Capitalize the start of the quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fillydelphia’ end quote//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br />Note that your paragraph indentations are very uneven. That can result from importing something rather than pasting it into FiMFic. Frankly, since you&#039;re leaving space between paragraphs, you don&#039;t need to indent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;less it disappear just as suddenly//</span><br />lest<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pulsant - it//</span><br />Dash, please. Suffice it to say you need to scan through the story for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Listen Solar W-…//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So, you have a-… you’re//</span><br />That punctuation combination is mutually exclusive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his misty eyes had already fold//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;James Joyce//</span><br />Where in the world is this coming from? I mean, I see where you&#039;re taking the story, but this is pretty sudden.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A click ahead//</span><br />Usually spelled &quot;klick&quot; for a measure of distance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;directly across it//</span><br />Missing a &quot;from.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fella&#039;//</span><br />No reason for that apostrophe. It&#039;s an imitative spelling, not an elision.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;15//</span><br />Spell out numbers this short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Donny!-//</span><br />A dash would come before an exclamation mark or question mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;BANG.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need sound effects in the narration. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but it was nothing that was already experienced//</span><br />Are you sure this is the way you meant to phrase it? It doesn&#039;t quite make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do you hear that-.” Her question slurred and trailed off//</span><br />Extraneous period, and you&#039;ve contradicted yourself. A dash doesn&#039;t indicate trailing off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The underboss was all that laid between me and Lightning Bolt.//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dumb-bell//</span><br />You&#039;d been capitalizing both parts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something?…//</span><br />Question mark goes after the ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Woah//</span><br />How is it that so many people can&#039;t spell such a simple word?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;detective Fleetfoot//</span><br />In this usage, &quot;Detective&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;soot grey//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leather coat//</span><br />As in &quot;she wears the skins of dead sentient cows&quot; leather?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;saturday//</span><br />Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;döppelganger//</span><br />The umlaut goes over the &quot;a.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;miss Fleetfoot//</span><br />Inconsistent with how you capitalized it before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sergeant began a gallant trot down west wing.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;outside my peripheral//</span><br />Her peripheral what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;taking a mouthful of Earth//</span><br />Lower case, since you presumably don&#039;t mean our planet specifically.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;700 miles per hour//</span><br />Spell it out. And it&#039;s an odd mix, since you used meters earlier in the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The rain was back in full force, taking away the warmth I had felt in that field with my daughter and Soarin. Once again, I was alone on Roscoe Street, excluding the pony currently bashing my head in. Another punch across the same cheek made fissures out of the cracks that were there before. All my senses became discombobulated, leaving me unable to do anything more than observe my own murder.//</span><br />Again, the narration doesn&#039;t match what&#039;s happening. It doesn&#039;t sound concussed at all, and it&#039;s noticing details she wouldn&#039;t be able to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;just, just//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His voice was as a grand piano as euphonious//</span><br />That second &quot;as&quot; doesn&#039;t quite parse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No budge.//</span><br />Odd word choice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;within my peripheral//</span><br />Again, her peripheral what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;say-.//</span><br />Extraneous period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wonderbolt//</span><br />Capitalize.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tied up//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The bind slackened.//</span><br />&quot;Binding&quot; or &quot;bond&quot; would work better. This has a different connotation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pearl white//</span><br />Hyphenate. And pearls aren&#039;t very white. The phrase &quot;pearly whites&quot; refers to the luster, not the color.<br /><br />I like the mood of this story. There are a few pervasive issues, like dash use and how you combine dashes with other punctuation. Mostly, though, I&#039;m going to urge you strongly again to reconsider some of the narrative voicing. You did a good job of changing the pacing during action scenes, for instance. So why wouldn&#039;t you adjust the narration to reflect her frame of mind when she&#039;s drunk or concussed? It&#039;s a little too cohesive and with a little too advanced vocabulary to feel like it accommodates what&#039;s happening. I see that one commenter complained about the tough words, too. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s so much of an issue for reader understanding, but more that it makes the story very uneven. She pops out one of these advanced words every once in a while, but she also uses a lot of vernacular, which would seem to fit her character better. So when she does open the dictionary, it jumps out at me as being out of place.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please choose the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option. In a break from the usual way of doing things, I&#039;d like a different pre-reader to look over it then, but I will try to expedite the process so you don&#039;t wait in the queue for weeks.<br /><br />And if this story is going where I think it is, it reminds me a little of this one: <a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="http://www.fimfiction.net/story/23731/author-author">http://www.fimfiction.net/story/23731/author-author</a><br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Nov 24th, 2014 21:57</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 311

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Cherry Pie has gotten into the hard cider and she’s dancing on top of Deputy Bench Warrant’s wagon again.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>he’d handle this a few times before//

Verb tense.

>With a nod I flipped my hat off, and caught it on a rear hoof.//

That's all one clause. It doesn't need the comma.

>my In basket//

No need to capitalize that. You could put "in" in quotes, but honestly, it's fine without them.

>to have hoof prints clean off his wagon//

Verb tense.

>an addenda//

"Addenda" is plural. You want "addendum."

>My little dog ran to the wall, and leapt to retrieve my hat.//

No comma. It's all one clause, and it's not particularly complex.

>middle aged//

Hyphenate.

>He was playing in our yard and I was watching through the front window.//

Comma between the clauses. Looks like you basically have the usage backward.

>I saw his ball roll into the neighbor’s yard, and I went out to tell him not to bother Mr. Counter//

Well, you got it right this time…

>“Alright, y’all listen up,” I raised my voice to address everypony.//

That's a pretty poor choice of speaking attribution. It does't really parse, grammatically.

>so if he’s close//

Comma after this.

>And if he does come out in the daylight//

Comma after this.

>and his folk come from deep jungles//

Comma after this.

>declared Hat Pin//

>said Prickly Pear//
>exclaimed Prickly Pear//
This is the sum total of the narration we get in thirteen paragraphs. This constitutes two problems:
1) Part of the joy in this is watching the conversants react to one another and seeing the body language as they speak. Keep in mind that the words are only half of a conversation. Let me see the nonverbal part. It's a much richer experience.
2) You have a first-person narrator, yet she stands idly by and has zero to comment on. She doesn't find this amusing or odd or something?

>‘Course//

You don't need the apostrophe (and it's backward anyway). There aren't missing letters; you're skipping an entire word.

>Once Aunt Keeper started in calling me ‘Little May’//

Comma after this.

>If this went on//

Comma after this.

>There was no pattern I could see, it seemed to happen on random nights.//

Comma splice.

>If the spinster mares heard her//

Comma after this.

>Ladies//

Why is this capitalized?

>OK//

Spell it out. And you've gone on a long dialogue-only ramble again. We call that "talking heads." For that matter you might as well read the sections at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions" and "talking heads."

>all business//

Hyphenate.

>Once I was satisfied that Barney had the scent//

Comma after this.

>If I ran into trouble//

Comma after this.

>A fear//

You sure you didn't mean "I"?

>Since I was on duty//

Comma after this.

>Can I offer you some refreshment.//

It's a question, right?

>something. “Cider.//

What's with all the extraneous space?

>Is that your dog, Sheriff Berry?//

Look how many times they use direct address in this conversation. Then think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation.

>Count wouldn’t have known it//

Comma after this.

>funny looking //

Hyphenate.

>As the welfare of a child is involved//

Comma after this.

>fore legs//

forelegs

>then a second head snake out of his collar.//

Verb tense.

>eleventh dimensional //

Hyphenate.

>I hoped he didn’t see me cringe.//

And finally we hear from the narrator. Another very talking-heads conversation. And it really does keep things a lot more boring than they should be. It's rare that you can rely on dialogue alone to carry the emotion, particularly in comedy.

>He pushed a big blue button and a platform descended from the ceiling.//

Comma between the clauses.

>I was round and glowed green.//

Sounds painful.

>He didn’t notice, and I didn’t mention, the scent of burning wiring.//

So her plan worked, and… she's completely stoic about it? That's pretty bland.

>Jenny Digger closed up shop, and took a job with a competing well digging firm.//

No comma. Well-digging.

>mean spirited//

>black bordered//
Hyphenate.

>We’ve grown used to that; and over time most folks have learned to deal with our more eccentric visitors.//

What does the semicolon give you that a comma wouldn't?

This story started off cute enough, and I appreciate all the nods to Andy Griffith. It needs a tune-up in the emotions department, though. Between the talking-heads conversations and May being so stoic about everything, you're forcing quite an emotional distance between the reader and the character that really shouldn't be there. She sounds utterly bored with everything to the point it's rarely worth making anything more than factual statements about it, so if she doesn't seem to care much, why should I? Fortunately, this isn't a particularly difficult problem to fix.

When you're ready to resubmit, please select the "back from Mars" option.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cherry Pie has gotten into the hard cider and she’s dancing on top of Deputy Bench Warrant’s wagon again.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he’d handle this a few times before//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With a nod I flipped my hat off, and caught it on a rear hoof.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. It doesn&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my In basket//</span><br />No need to capitalize that. You could put &quot;in&quot; in quotes, but honestly, it&#039;s fine without them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to have hoof prints clean off his wagon//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;an addenda//</span><br />&quot;Addenda&quot; is plural. You want &quot;addendum.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My little dog ran to the wall, and leapt to retrieve my hat.//</span><br />No comma. It&#039;s all one clause, and it&#039;s not particularly complex.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;middle aged//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was playing in our yard and I was watching through the front window.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses. Looks like you basically have the usage backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I saw his ball roll into the neighbor’s yard, and I went out to tell him not to bother Mr. Counter//</span><br />Well, you got it right this time…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Alright, y’all listen up,” I raised my voice to address everypony.//</span><br />That&#039;s a pretty poor choice of speaking attribution. It does&#039;t really parse, grammatically.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;so if he’s close//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And if he does come out in the daylight//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and his folk come from deep jungles//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;declared Hat Pin//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said Prickly Pear//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;exclaimed Prickly Pear//</span><br />This is the sum total of the narration we get in thirteen paragraphs. This constitutes two problems:<br />1) Part of the joy in this is watching the conversants react to one another and seeing the body language as they speak. Keep in mind that the words are only half of a conversation. Let me see the nonverbal part. It&#039;s a much richer experience.<br />2) You have a first-person narrator, yet she stands idly by and has zero to comment on. She doesn&#039;t find this amusing or odd or <i>something?</i><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Course//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the apostrophe (and it&#039;s backward anyway). There aren&#039;t missing letters; you&#039;re skipping an entire word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once Aunt Keeper started in calling me ‘Little May’//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If this went on//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was no pattern I could see, it seemed to happen on random nights.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If the spinster mares heard her//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ladies//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;OK//</span><br />Spell it out. And you&#039;ve gone on a long dialogue-only ramble again. We call that &quot;talking heads.&quot; For that matter you might as well read the sections at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions&quot; and &quot;talking heads.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all business//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once I was satisfied that Barney had the scent//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I ran into trouble//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A fear//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;I&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Since I was on duty//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Can I offer you some refreshment.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;something. “Cider.//</span><br />What&#039;s with all the extraneous space?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Is that your dog, Sheriff Berry?//</span><br />Look how many times they use direct address in this conversation. Then think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Count wouldn’t have known it//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;funny looking //</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the welfare of a child is involved//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fore legs//</span><br />forelegs<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then a second head snake out of his collar.//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eleventh dimensional //</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hoped he didn’t see me cringe.//</span><br />And finally we hear from the narrator. Another very talking-heads conversation. And it really does keep things a lot more boring than they should be. It&#039;s rare that you can rely on dialogue alone to carry the emotion, particularly in comedy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He pushed a big blue button and a platform descended from the ceiling.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was round and glowed green.//</span><br />Sounds painful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He didn’t notice, and I didn’t mention, the scent of burning wiring.//</span><br />So her plan worked, and… she&#039;s completely stoic about it? That&#039;s pretty bland.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Jenny Digger closed up shop, and took a job with a competing well digging firm.//</span><br />No comma. Well-digging.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mean spirited//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;black bordered//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We’ve grown used to that; and over time most folks have learned to deal with our more eccentric visitors.//</span><br />What does the semicolon give you that a comma wouldn&#039;t?<br /><br />This story started off cute enough, and I appreciate all the nods to Andy Griffith. It needs a tune-up in the emotions department, though. Between the talking-heads conversations and May being so stoic about everything, you&#039;re forcing quite an emotional distance between the reader and the character that really shouldn&#039;t be there. She sounds utterly bored with everything to the point it&#039;s rarely worth making anything more than factual statements about it, so if she doesn&#039;t seem to care much, why should I? Fortunately, this isn&#039;t a particularly difficult problem to fix.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Nov 24th, 2014 22:42</span></div><br/>

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 312

>>131279
Thanks for the review. I've applied all your changes and also got a friend from the U.S. to look over it. In hindsight, it was only natural for this story to fail without any editing by people who know their language.

The only question I have: What option should I set for resubmitting? "Yes - This story has been submitted before." or "Yes - This story is back from Mars. Good to go?"<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131279" onclick="return highlight('131279', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131279">&gt;&gt;131279</a><br />Thanks for the review. I&#039;ve applied all your changes and also got a friend from the U.S. to look over it. In hindsight, it was only natural for this story to fail without any editing by people who know their language.<br /><br />The only question I have: What option should I set for resubmitting? &quot;Yes - This story has been submitted before.&quot; or &quot;Yes - This story is back from Mars. Good to go?&quot;<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 313

>>131295
Choose the "Yes, this story has been submitted before" option. We'll tell you to use the Mars one if that's appropriate. Looking forward to seeing what you've done with the story!<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131295" onclick="return highlight('131295', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131295">&gt;&gt;131295</a><br />Choose the &quot;Yes, this story has been submitted before&quot; option. We&#039;ll tell you to use the Mars one if that&#039;s appropriate. Looking forward to seeing what you&#039;ve done with the story!<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 314

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Above all else, she was proud of her students for everything they had accomplished, and excited to see how the rest of their lives would turn out.//

Just a few examples of things she was proud of would serve you far better than making a vague generality like this.

>Looking over the crowd of happy families in the schoolyard, Miss Honeydew’s smile grew a little wider as she recognized more and more faces.//

You're explicitly saying that her smile looked over the crowd, not her.

>Whisker Biscuit//

I have no idea why you'd choose to name a character that in a clean story. That's got some rather raunchy connotations, and I'd really urge you to come up with something different.

>who also had a rather memorable Cutie Mark discovery a few years earlier. A hollow look briefly crossed her features and she chuckled weakly as she remembered the incident//

There's really no point in teasing like this if you're not going to tell the story.

>This-”//

Please use a proper dash for interruptions and asides. It's worth scanning through the story fr these.

>a look of disgusted disbelief//

>tight-lipped anger//
These are just a couple of examples, but it's much more effective to let me observe the characters and draw my own conclusions than have the narrator do that as a proxy for me.

>4//

Spell it out.

>clutzy//

klutzy

>impressively-sized//

When the first word of a phrase like this is an -ly adverb, you don't need the hyphen.

>massive amount of letters//

"Amount" is really for collective quantities. You could have a massive amount of mail, but a massive number of letters.

>Lily let out a long breath she didn’t know she had been holding//

This is very cliched.

>sat..//

Extra period.

>Figuring that she probably wasn’t going to fall asleep anytime soon, Lily gave in and tossed the comforter aside, walking over to the still-considerable stack of letters she hadn’t read yet.//

You really do use a lot of these participial phrases. Besides getting repetitive, they have their own attendant problems, like the dangling participle I pointed out earlier. Here's another: they imply simultaneous action, so you have her tossing the comforter aside at the same time she walks to the stack of letters, though it'd more reasonably happen in sequence.

>Not that she had reason to betray that trust, of course//

No need to capitalize the parenthetical element.

>she was too tired to bother doing anything//

Almost the exact phrasing you used in the last paragraph, and it's not pointed out in a way that the repetition seems deliberate and meaningful.

>she was too tired//

>suddenly be so very tired now//
>blinked tiredly//
So, she's tired, you say?

>Lily sat down at her desk and lit a candle to read by, and opened the letter//

Why the litany of "and"s? That's a clunky construction.

>Should I just tell him what his talent it//

Typo.

>large, decorative//

These are hierarchical adjectives and don't need the comma.

>but before she could speak//

Comma fo the dependent clause.

>she was interrupted by Spike opening the doors to the library, carrying a stack of letters and a newspaper//

There are a lot of things wrong with this, Small things, but they add up. First, participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so it tends to say the library was carrying a stack of books. Now, I can apply a little logic to say it must be Spike, but I still have to wade back across "library," "stack," and "books" to get to the correct object. It muddles things a bit to have hat phrase so far from what it modifies. It'd do better as a separate sentence, though, as this one meanders around to so many different things that it loses focus. The passive voice isn't helping here, either. An interruption is an active thing. But I lose the sense of it because Twilight never really gets started doing anything and because Spike's interruption is cast as a passive thing.

>Spike looked smug//

Why don't I get to see it? Emotions are so much more powerful when I interpret them from the context, just like if I was there watching him. It disarms the impact when the narrator makes the conclusion for me.

>Twilight cast a suspicious glance at the mail in the young dragon’s arms, and thought she saw the ribbon of a Royal Seal poking out of the stack.//

Opposite issue from before. This is all one clause, so you don't need the comma.

>Live.”

You would keep an exclamation marl or question mark in the italics, but other punctuation should go back to normal font, unless the entire passage is italicized, like in a letter or brief flashback. You do this a number of times, and it looks odd when the closing quotes don't match the opening ones, for instance. You do this a lot.

>a worried glance//

Again, let me see this. You don't have to show all the time, and you didn't seem to have trouble with it in the first couple chapters, but it's starting to crop up.

>Twilight smiled wider at him, holding up her newspaper.//

Here's a case where it's truly ambiguous. Either one of them could be holding up the newspaper, and the grammatical default says he is, but most authors using this construction actually mean Twilight.

>then took her copy of this morning’s Ponyville Express over to a reading table, opening it up to the puzzles and games section

Yet another danger of participles: they synchronize actions, but she doesn't open the paper until after she's gotten to the table.

>cried excitedly//

More telling that really doesn't need to be so. Let me see her look and act excited. Think of her as an actor. She wouldn't just go on stage and say she's excited. She'd get you to conclude she was. Good writing works the same way.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>to look upset//

Show me.

>Lu-pine!//

Since it's attached to a (partially) italicized word, italicize the exclamation mark as well.

>had the sense to look apologetic//

Again, show me. But the bigger issue here is that "had the sense" implies that this is someone's judgment, but you haven't established a perspective for the narrator. I have no idea whose opinion this is.

>puh-seudo-’” -Sweetie Belle winced- “-magical

Use proper dashes for asides or interruptions, and you've doubles up on them here. eep the pair arouns "Sweetie Belle winced" if you intend for the speech to go on uninterrupted, and the other pair if she stops speaking for the action. On the other hand, if you actually mean that to be part of a hyphenated term, remove the one with "magical," since you already have one with the first part of the quote.

>Whoah//

This fandom never ceases to surprise me with the number of people who can't spell this correctly.

>Sweetie Belle asked in excitement. Spike began to look worried.//

Show me. You should get the picture by now. Suffice it to say that you need to sweep through the story for things like this.

>Spike decided now was the time to speak up, but before he could, he was interrupted by the voice of Twilight, who was rounding a bookcase and approaching them.//

Same as before, this sentence tries to do too much, and the interruption loses its quality by being cast in passive voice.

>Twilight looked lost for a second before she remembered what the three had been studying.//

The perspective is all over the place here. Only she knows what she remembers, but she wouldn't think of herself as "looking lost," so this is both in her head and in some unidentified observer's. You need to be careful to keep a consistent character perspective. You can jump to different characters, but if you do it too abruptly or often, it just makes the narration jerky.

>Twilight looked thoughtful for a moment until Spike caught her eye by making worried gestures toward the slightly discouraged-looking fillies.//

Same thing, with lots of telly language to boot.

>It looked like Twilight had made short work of both the crossword and Sudoku, but hadn’t started on the word puzzle yet.//

And this appears to be in the collective viewpoint of the CMCs.

>it’ll happen on it’s own//

Its/it's confusion.

>glad for a chance to be helpful again//

And now we're back in Twilight's head.

I'll stop here, as I can see from glancing ahead, it's more of the same. The first two chapters did a much better job of showing. With maintaining perspective, too, though that pretty much happens by default, since Lily's the only character present for those. So the later chapters really need to tighten up the character perspectives and do more showing. The biggest issues with the first two chapters were some repetitiveness in word choice and action, and an abundance of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring to read, as nothing happens. It's impractical to remove them altogether, but you ought to be looking for ways to use more active language.

If you sort these out, I'll look through the rest of the chapters in more detail.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Above all else, she was proud of her students for everything they had accomplished, and excited to see how the rest of their lives would turn out.//</span><br />Just a few examples of things she was proud of would serve you far better than making a vague generality like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Looking over the crowd of happy families in the schoolyard, Miss Honeydew’s smile grew a little wider as she recognized more and more faces.//</span><br />You&#039;re explicitly saying that her smile looked over the crowd, not her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Whisker Biscuit//</span><br />I have no idea why you&#039;d choose to name a character that in a clean story. That&#039;s got some rather raunchy connotations, and I&#039;d really urge you to come up with something different.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who also had a rather memorable Cutie Mark discovery a few years earlier. A hollow look briefly crossed her features and she chuckled weakly as she remembered the incident//</span><br />There&#039;s really no point in teasing like this if you&#039;re not going to tell the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This-”//</span><br />Please use a proper dash for interruptions and asides. It&#039;s worth scanning through the story fr these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a look of disgusted disbelief//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tight-lipped anger//</span><br />These are just a couple of examples, but it&#039;s much more effective to let me observe the characters and draw my own conclusions than have the narrator do that as a proxy for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;4//</span><br />Spell it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;clutzy//</span><br />klutzy<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;impressively-sized//</span><br />When the first word of a phrase like this is an -ly adverb, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;massive amount of letters//</span><br />&quot;Amount&quot; is really for collective quantities. You could have a massive amount of mail, but a massive number of letters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily let out a long breath she didn’t know she had been holding//</span><br />This is very cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sat..//</span><br />Extra period.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Figuring that she probably wasn’t going to fall asleep anytime soon, Lily gave in and tossed the comforter aside, walking over to the still-considerable stack of letters she hadn’t read yet.//</span><br />You really do use a lot of these participial phrases. Besides getting repetitive, they have their own attendant problems, like the dangling participle I pointed out earlier. Here&#039;s another: they imply simultaneous action, so you have her tossing the comforter aside at the same time she walks to the stack of letters, though it&#039;d more reasonably happen in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not that she had reason to betray that trust, of course//</span><br />No need to capitalize the parenthetical element.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was too tired to bother doing anything//</span><br />Almost the exact phrasing you used in the last paragraph, and it&#039;s not pointed out in a way that the repetition seems deliberate and meaningful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was too tired//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;suddenly be so very tired now//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blinked tiredly//</span><br />So, she&#039;s tired, you say?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lily sat down at her desk and lit a candle to read by, and opened the letter//</span><br />Why the litany of &quot;and&quot;s? That&#039;s a clunky construction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Should I just tell him what his talent it//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;large, decorative//</span><br />These are hierarchical adjectives and don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before she could speak//</span><br />Comma fo the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was interrupted by Spike opening the doors to the library, carrying a stack of letters and a newspaper//</span><br />There are a lot of things wrong with this, Small things, but they add up. First, participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so it tends to say the library was carrying a stack of books. Now, I can apply a little logic to say it must be Spike, but I still have to wade back across &quot;library,&quot; &quot;stack,&quot; and &quot;books&quot; to get to the correct object. It muddles things a bit to have hat phrase so far from what it modifies. It&#039;d do better as a separate sentence, though, as this one meanders around to so many different things that it loses focus. The passive voice isn&#039;t helping here, either. An interruption is an active thing. But I lose the sense of it because Twilight never really gets started doing anything and because Spike&#039;s interruption is cast as a passive thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike looked smug//</span><br />Why don&#039;t I get to see it? Emotions are so much more powerful when I interpret them from the context, just like if I was there watching him. It disarms the impact when the narrator makes the conclusion for me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight cast a suspicious glance at the mail in the young dragon’s arms, and thought she saw the ribbon of a Royal Seal poking out of the stack.//</span><br />Opposite issue from before. This is all one clause, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Live.”</i></span><br />You would keep an exclamation marl or question mark in the italics, but other punctuation should go back to normal font, unless the entire passage is italicized, like in a letter or brief flashback. You do this a number of times, and it looks odd when the closing quotes don&#039;t match the opening ones, for instance. You do this a lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a worried glance//</span><br />Again, let me see this. You don&#039;t have to show all the time, and you didn&#039;t seem to have trouble with it in the first couple chapters, but it&#039;s starting to crop up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight smiled wider at him, holding up her newspaper.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a case where it&#039;s truly ambiguous. Either one of them could be holding up the newspaper, and the grammatical default says he is, but most authors using this construction actually mean Twilight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then took her copy of this morning’s <i>Ponyville Express</i> over to a reading table, opening it up to the puzzles and games section</span><br />Yet another danger of participles: they synchronize actions, but she doesn&#039;t open the paper until after she&#039;s gotten to the table.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cried excitedly//</span><br />More telling that really doesn&#039;t need to be so. Let me see her look and act excited. Think of her as an actor. She wouldn&#039;t just go on stage and say she&#039;s excited. She&#039;d get you to conclude she was. Good writing works the same way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to look upset//</span><br />Show me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lu-pine!//</span><br />Since it&#039;s attached to a (partially) italicized word, italicize the exclamation mark as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;had the sense to look apologetic//</span><br />Again, show me. But the bigger issue here is that &quot;had the sense&quot; implies that this is someone&#039;s judgment, but you haven&#039;t established a perspective for the narrator. I have no idea whose opinion this is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>puh-seudo-’”</i> -Sweetie Belle winced- “<i>-magical</i></span><br />Use proper dashes for asides or interruptions, and you&#039;ve doubles up on them here. eep the pair arouns &quot;Sweetie Belle winced&quot; if you intend for the speech to go on uninterrupted, and the other pair if she stops speaking for the action. On the other hand, if you actually mean that to be part of a hyphenated term, remove the one with &quot;magical,&quot; since you already have one with the first part of the quote.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Whoah//</span><br />This fandom never ceases to surprise me with the number of people who can&#039;t spell this correctly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle asked in excitement. Spike began to look worried.//</span><br />Show me. You should get the picture by now. Suffice it to say that you need to sweep through the story for things like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike decided now was the time to speak up, but before he could, he was interrupted by the voice of Twilight, who was rounding a bookcase and approaching them.//</span><br />Same as before, this sentence tries to do too much, and the interruption loses its quality by being cast in passive voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight looked lost for a second before she remembered what the three had been studying.//</span><br />The perspective is all over the place here. Only she knows what she remembers, but she wouldn&#039;t think of herself as &quot;looking lost,&quot; so this is both in her head and in some unidentified observer&#039;s. You need to be careful to keep a consistent character perspective. You can jump to different characters, but if you do it too abruptly or often, it just makes the narration jerky.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight looked thoughtful for a moment until Spike caught her eye by making worried gestures toward the slightly discouraged-looking fillies.//</span><br />Same thing, with lots of telly language to boot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It looked like Twilight had made short work of both the crossword and Sudoku, but hadn’t started on the word puzzle yet.//</span><br />And this appears to be in the collective viewpoint of the CMCs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’ll happen on it’s own//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;glad for a chance to be helpful again//</span><br />And now we&#039;re back in Twilight&#039;s head.<br /><br />I&#039;ll stop here, as I can see from glancing ahead, it&#039;s more of the same. The first two chapters did a much better job of showing. With maintaining perspective, too, though that pretty much happens by default, since Lily&#039;s the only character present for those. So the later chapters really need to tighten up the character perspectives and do more showing. The biggest issues with the first two chapters were some repetitiveness in word choice and action, and an abundance of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring to read, as nothing happens. It&#039;s impractical to remove them altogether, but you ought to be looking for ways to use more active language.<br /><br />If you sort these out, I&#039;ll look through the rest of the chapters in more detail.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 315

>>131308
Thanks for the review, I'm really glad these things were finally pointed out to me. I'll go through and fix what I can. Do you want me to resubmit it after that, or should I let you know some other way that it's updated? Or do you want to know at all?

I didn't know Whisker Biscuit was an innuendo, honestly. It kind of has that sort of sound to it, so I checked before I wrote it in, but I didn't find anything then so I thought it was safe. Usually things like that are much too easy to find. But after you mentioned it, I dug a little deeper and finally found something (blegh. Thank you so much for sending me in that direction :P). So sorry for that, it was completely unintended. No one else has brought it up, so I'm still confident that the innuendo is obscure enough that it's still worth keeping. Unless you feel strongly enough about it that you think I shouldn't, of course. I still think the reasons I included it in the first place are worth the risk that some readers might read too much into it, and I don't think I could come up with anything as clever to take its place. There is a perfectly innocent archery accessory called a Whisker Biscuit, and it's about 98% of what you'd find under that name on the internet unless you're looking in places that will obviously lead you to the 2%. I only meant it as a pun name to tie together archery and baking, and I thought it was clever.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131308" onclick="return highlight('131308', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131308">&gt;&gt;131308</a><br />Thanks for the review, I&#039;m really glad these things were finally pointed out to me. I&#039;ll go through and fix what I can. Do you want me to resubmit it after that, or should I let you know some other way that it&#039;s updated? Or do you want to know at all?<br /><br />I didn&#039;t know Whisker Biscuit was an innuendo, honestly. It kind of has that sort of sound to it, so I checked before I wrote it in, but I didn&#039;t find anything then so I thought it was safe. Usually things like that are much too easy to find. But after you mentioned it, I dug a little deeper and finally found something (blegh. Thank you so much for sending me in that direction :P). So sorry for that, it was completely unintended. No one else has brought it up, so I&#039;m still confident that the innuendo is obscure enough that it&#039;s still worth keeping. Unless you feel strongly enough about it that you think I shouldn&#039;t, of course. I still think the reasons I included it in the first place are worth the risk that some readers might read too much into it, and I don&#039;t think I could come up with anything as clever to take its place. There is a perfectly innocent archery accessory called a Whisker Biscuit, and it&#039;s about 98% of what you&#039;d find under that name on the internet unless you&#039;re looking in places that will obviously lead you to the 2%. I only meant it as a pun name to tie together archery and baking, and I thought it was clever.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 316

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>wobbly looking//

Hyphenate

>in crescendo of noise//

Missing word.

>with incomprehension//

How does this look? I'd rather make my own judgment than take the narrator's word for it.

>her voice way too loud for the nighttime air//

That just sounds odd. What about nighttime air makes any particular volume level appropriate? If just "nighttime," I could see it, but when you specify "air," it no longer makes sense. Does the air become more fragile after dark, for instance?

>Pinkie Pie cut her off//

This is redundant with the fact you cut off her speech with a dash. Furthermore, the fact that the narrator has time to say this before getting to what the interruption actually was undercuts the sense of suddenness..

>have to need to be doing//

Seems like you changed your mind on how to phrase that and forgot to delete one.

>relief spreading across her face//

Telly.

>Pinkie Pie’s voice turned slightly worried//

Telly.

>as she fruitlessly tried to parse Pinkie’s metaphor//

Given that Apple Bloom holds the perspective, it implies that these are word choices and phrasings that she would know in the first place and be inclined to use. It just doesn't sound like her, though.

>sisyphean//

See above. This is also a capitalized term.

>And she really should have grabbed that scarf.//

See, this is a very deep-perspective, conversational style. It sounds like the character's internal musings to herself, so it's especially important to make it sound like something she would actually think or say, word for word. Hence my point about word choices that don't match her well.

>Her sisters eyes//

Missing an apostrophe.

>And quite frankly, I’d rather be sleeping right now.//

This doesn't really sound like Apple Bloom, either.

>its due any day now//

Its/it's confusion.

>I’m pretty sure cuz can handle herself at this point.//

When used as part of the name or a replacement of it, "Cuz" would be capitalized.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Past one in from somewhere else. I'm not going to note any more of these if I find them, so make a sweep.

>sage like wisdom//

Sage-like

>Now let’s get you home, sis//

In this usage, "Sis" would be capitalized.

>nothin//

Missing apostrophe.

>high pitched//

Hyphenate.

>Her eyes rolled up into the back of her head and she promptly collapsed//

Needs a comma to separate the clauses.

>leaning onto her//

This is the fourth participial phrase in the last five sentences. You're not awful overall, but you do use them in clusters overall, and besides being repetitive in structure, they're a crutch that writers just starting to gain some experience lean on.

>her sisters weight//

Missing apostrophe.

>Apple Bloom managed to wriggle out from underneath her and Applejack slumped to the ground//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>looking confused//

Telly

>y’all should lighten up a little//

As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it's pretty rare for someone to use "y'all" as a singular.

>Sorry, Sug//

You didn't capitalize that term of endearment before, and it shouldn't be.

>yknow//

y'know

>Ain’t really get a lot of those.//

"Ain't got" or "don't get," I would expect.

>hearths warming eve//

Hearth's Warming Eve

>she paused, kicking the dirt at her hooves as if to emphasize something//

You've punctuated that like a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb.

>“Uh..”//

One more or one fewer periods.

>sis//

Just capitalize this whenever it's used as a term of direct address.

>a serpent of chaos happened by chance upon this new world, and saw his chance to sew his own seeds of discontent//

That comma is unnecessary, and sow/sew confusion.

>Applejack sped up slightly to catch back up.//

Probably best to avoid the close repetition of "up" like this.

>Apple Bloom watch//

Verb form

>rainbow colored//

Hyphenate. And the comma just before this is a splice.

>it seemed especially embarrassing for some reason//

This doesn't quite ring true. First off, it's either embarrassing or it isn't. "Seem" shouldn't enter into it. And Apple Bloom is the perspective character. She should know why it's embarrassing. Why waffle with that "for some reason"?

>“”Mmm’sorry.”//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>her sisters neck//

Missing apostrophe. This is a consistent issue, and one that surprises me for an author this experienced.

I can't help feeling like this story is missing something. It's well-written, and the character voices are done well, except for the issue where Apple Bloom suddenly gains an advanced vocabulary and diction at times. More, though, is that there's only a weakly coherent message here. I think it would provide a lot more strength to the story to make character motivations clearer. If all you intended it to be was a sweet moment between sisters, then you have that, but a story needs some kind of change, growth, or conflict.

AJ finally lets on that she's having a hard time trying to be a mother to Apple Bloom, and I'm glad you brought that up, because it means there's something here. But we never get a picture of the full extent of that. Is she being deceptive about why she drinks? She says it's just to blow off steam, and that's not necessarily a lie. But does she drink because of the pressure of being a mother? Did she tell this tale just because it occurred to her at random, or because it's related to their mother, who is always on her mind when she gets drunk? In her state, might AJ say so explicitly? Does Apple Bloom realize any of this? If so, how does she feel about it? What does she do about it, or at least consider doing at some point in the future?

You do go into this a little, but it's so late in the story and so tangential that it left me waiting a long time to see what the point was and wondering why it was given such a light touch. Understated is definitely better than over the top, but (and this is just my opinion), I think you could benefit from a little foreshadowing early on to hint at what AJ's internal conflict is, a stronger sense that Apple Bloom understands it and starts deciding what to do about it (even if it's nothing), and whether this is a once-in-a-while or chronic source of pain for AJ. What little AJ already does say about their mother is pretty much in the sweet spot between being so vague as to pass unnoticed and exaggerated to the point of becoming maudlin. So it's more about hinting at the conflict earlier on and showing how that affects Apple Bloom, both immediately and into the future. I think you're on the verge of something special here. Yes, there are a lot of "the Apples' parents are dead" stories out there, but these ones that examine how that affects other relationships still can take a fresh angle on it. I should know—I wrote one myself.

The kinds of things I'm looking for here aren't so broad as to require a full examination of the story again, so when you're ready, select the "back from Mars" option. It'll expedite the process, since I pick up my returning stories more quickly than things in the general queue. If you disagree with what I'm suggesting here, then you have the option of discussing your position or requesting that a different pre-reader review it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wobbly looking//</span><br />Hyphenate<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in crescendo of noise//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with incomprehension//</span><br />How does this look? I&#039;d rather make my own judgment than take the narrator&#039;s word for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her voice way too loud for the nighttime air//</span><br />That just sounds odd. What about nighttime air makes any particular volume level appropriate? If just &quot;nighttime,&quot; I could see it, but when you specify &quot;air,&quot; it no longer makes sense. Does the air become more fragile after dark, for instance?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie cut her off//</span><br />This is redundant with the fact you cut off her speech with a dash. Furthermore, the fact that the narrator has time to say this before getting to what the interruption actually was undercuts the sense of suddenness..<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;have to need to be doing//</span><br />Seems like you changed your mind on how to phrase that and forgot to delete one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;relief spreading across her face//</span><br />Telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie Pie’s voice turned slightly worried//</span><br />Telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she fruitlessly tried to parse Pinkie’s metaphor//</span><br />Given that Apple Bloom holds the perspective, it implies that these are word choices and phrasings that she would know in the first place and be inclined to use. It just doesn&#039;t sound like her, though.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sisyphean//</span><br />See above. This is also a capitalized term.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And she really should have grabbed that scarf.//</span><br />See, this is a very deep-perspective, conversational style. It sounds like the character&#039;s internal musings to herself, so it&#039;s especially important to make it sound like something she would actually think or say, word for word. Hence my point about word choices that don&#039;t match her well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her sisters eyes//</span><br />Missing an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And quite frankly, I’d rather be sleeping right now.//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t really sound like Apple Bloom, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;its due any day now//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m pretty sure cuz can handle herself at this point.//</span><br />When used as part of the name or a replacement of it, &quot;Cuz&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Past one in from somewhere else. I&#039;m not going to note any more of these if I find them, so make a sweep.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sage like wisdom//</span><br />Sage-like<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now let’s get you home, sis//</span><br />In this usage, &quot;Sis&quot; would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nothin//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high pitched//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes rolled up into the back of her head and she promptly collapsed//</span><br />Needs a comma to separate the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leaning onto her//</span><br />This is the fourth participial phrase in the last five sentences. You&#039;re not awful overall, but you do use them in clusters overall, and besides being repetitive in structure, they&#039;re a crutch that writers just starting to gain some experience lean on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her sisters weight//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom managed to wriggle out from underneath her and Applejack slumped to the ground//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking confused//</span><br />Telly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;y’all should lighten up a little//</span><br />As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it&#039;s pretty rare for someone to use &quot;y&#039;all&quot; as a singular.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sorry, Sug//</span><br />You didn&#039;t capitalize that term of endearment before, and it shouldn&#039;t be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yknow//</span><br />y&#039;know<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ain’t really get a lot of those.//</span><br />&quot;Ain&#039;t got&quot; or &quot;don&#039;t get,&quot; I would expect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hearths warming eve//</span><br />Hearth&#039;s Warming Eve<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she paused, kicking the dirt at her hooves as if to emphasize something//</span><br />You&#039;ve punctuated that like a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Uh..”//</span><br />One more or one fewer periods.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />Just capitalize this whenever it&#039;s used as a term of direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a serpent of chaos happened by chance upon this new world, and saw his chance to sew his own seeds of discontent//</span><br />That comma is unnecessary, and sow/sew confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack sped up slightly to catch back up.//</span><br />Probably best to avoid the close repetition of &quot;up&quot; like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Apple Bloom watch//</span><br />Verb form<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rainbow colored//</span><br />Hyphenate. And the comma just before this is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it seemed especially embarrassing for some reason//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t quite ring true. First off, it&#039;s either embarrassing or it isn&#039;t. &quot;Seem&quot; shouldn&#039;t enter into it. And Apple Bloom is the perspective character. She should know why it&#039;s embarrassing. Why waffle with that &quot;for some reason&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“”Mmm’sorry.”//</span><br />Extraneous quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her sisters neck//</span><br />Missing apostrophe. This is a consistent issue, and one that surprises me for an author this experienced.<br /><br />I can&#039;t help feeling like this story is missing something. It&#039;s well-written, and the character voices are done well, except for the issue where Apple Bloom suddenly gains an advanced vocabulary and diction at times. More, though, is that there&#039;s only a weakly coherent message here. I think it would provide a lot more strength to the story to make character motivations clearer. If all you intended it to be was a sweet moment between sisters, then you have that, but a story needs some kind of change, growth, or conflict.<br /><br />AJ finally lets on that she&#039;s having a hard time trying to be a mother to Apple Bloom, and I&#039;m glad you brought that up, because it means there&#039;s something here. But we never get a picture of the full extent of that. Is she being deceptive about why she drinks? She says it&#039;s just to blow off steam, and that&#039;s not necessarily a lie. But does she drink because of the pressure of being a mother? Did she tell this tale just because it occurred to her at random, or because it&#039;s related to their mother, who is always on her mind when she gets drunk? In her state, might AJ say so explicitly? Does Apple Bloom realize any of this? If so, how does she feel about it? What does she do about it, or at least consider doing at some point in the future?<br /><br />You do go into this a little, but it&#039;s so late in the story and so tangential that it left me waiting a long time to see what the point was and wondering why it was given such a light touch. Understated is definitely better than over the top, but (and this is just my opinion), I think you could benefit from a little foreshadowing early on to hint at what AJ&#039;s internal conflict is, a stronger sense that Apple Bloom understands it and starts deciding what to do about it (even if it&#039;s nothing), and whether this is a once-in-a-while or chronic source of pain for AJ. What little AJ already does say about their mother is pretty much in the sweet spot between being so vague as to pass unnoticed and exaggerated to the point of becoming maudlin. So it&#039;s more about hinting at the conflict earlier on and showing how that affects Apple Bloom, both immediately and into the future. I think you&#039;re on the verge of something special here. Yes, there are a lot of &quot;the Apples&#039; parents are dead&quot; stories out there, but these ones that examine how that affects other relationships still can take a fresh angle on it. I should know—I wrote one myself.<br /><br />The kinds of things I&#039;m looking for here aren&#039;t so broad as to require a full examination of the story again, so when you&#039;re ready, select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option. It&#039;ll expedite the process, since I pick up my returning stories more quickly than things in the general queue. If you disagree with what I&#039;m suggesting here, then you have the option of discussing your position or requesting that a different pre-reader review it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 317

>>131311
When you're ready to resubmit, just do so the same as before. I'll take it again, which tends to expedite things a bit.

As to Whisker Biscuit, I'm an archer myself, but for those who aren't, the innuendo definition will be the one the general public is more likely to know. Or many might not know either and assume you're saying he's a baker with a beard.
<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131311" onclick="return highlight('131311', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131311">&gt;&gt;131311</a><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, just do so the same as before. I&#039;ll take it again, which tends to expedite things a bit.<br /><br />As to Whisker Biscuit, I&#039;m an archer myself, but for those who aren&#039;t, the innuendo definition will be the one the general public is more likely to know. Or many might not know either and assume you&#039;re saying he&#039;s a baker with a beard.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Fri, Dec 12th, 2014 23:40</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 318

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>guestroom//

Two words.

>your highness//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>princess//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>of consternation//

Prepositional phrases that communicate a mood stick out like a sore thumb as being telly, and they're often redundant with information already there. In this case, it's not, but it wouldn't take much to show a couple of facial expressions to do this more effectively.

>the assembly of petitioners and nobleponies were//

Subject/verb number. assembly -> were. There is a sense in which this might work, except the behavior here is described as a collective, not individual reactions.

>their attitudes ran the gamut from nervous stoicism to emerging panic//

Besides being telly, I don't get this observation. Celestia's held the perspective, and I'm not sure why she'd note this without saying why she felt it was significant. If she didn't care, then she probably wouldn't have picked up on it, so it's odd to see her spell this out very factually without a reaction.

>steel grey//

Hyphenate.

>your Highness//

See, it's inconsistent with the last time you used it. But "Your" would also be capitalized.

>Celestia let her gaze swing out over the assembled ponies.//

This really doesn't fit with her attitude. She has a purpose to it, so she does this deliberately, yet it sounds like she's doing it despite her better judgment, like allowing her mind to wander during a meeting where she should really be paying attention.

>There was plenty of fear and confusion to be seen, but also confidence, love, and trust.//

Show me some of these. It'd have a lot more impact. A few examples is worth more than a ton of generalities.

>of calm serenity//

There you go again. It's entirely unnecessary to say this. The fact that she's trying to control her expression at all says that she wants to appear unaffected.

>Luna’s voice suddenly cut her off, ringing throughout the throne room with firm authority.//

Two things: 1. The punctuation already told me she got cut off. The narrator doen't need to reiterate. 2. The fact that the narrator has time to fit this sentence in undercuts the suddenness of the interruption. When there is one, the very next thing should be what interrupts. Anything else you wedge in there hurts the mood.

>sister//

Another word that should be capitalized as a term of address.

>Celestia rose and stepped down from the throne to meet her sister, giving her an affectionate nuzzle.//

Which one of them is giving the nuzzle? It's a misplaced modifier, as participial phrases often are, but this one is truly ambiguous. By grammatical default, Luna is doing the nuzzling, but many authors using this structure intend Celestia.

>Celestia lowered her eyes to the floor//

Have a look at the first word of the last four paragraphs.

>The changelings are less than two hours away from Canterlot, and the scouts weren’t even able to estimate how many there are; thousands for sure, and probably several times as many as they had during their assault at the wedding.//

That's not really a proper use of a semicolon. There's no independent clause after it. Perhaps a dash.

>a relieved smile//

More telliness.

>pricked their ears up with visible eagerness//

The way it's described, it's visible by default.

>Should the absolute worst-case scenario comes to pass//

Verb form typo.

At this point, I wonder if this is AU or takes place after A Canterlot Wedding. If the latter, the changelings would already know about the caves, right? Oh, okay, Luna refers to the last incident. So they aren't going to acknowledge that even though it's defensible, it's not secret?

Then Luna speaks without interruption for 5 paragraphs. Her only action before doing so is telly, and she doesn't get an action afterward. That makes it awful hard to picture this in my mind.

>issue - a//

Use a proper dash, please. There's a key at the top of this thread for how to space and produce them.

>your majesty//

You are very inconsistent in how you capitalize this. Both words should be.

>them with//

Extraneous space.

>sigh of relief//

Another unnecessary/redundant statement of emotion. At this point, suffice it to say you should look out for telly language (there's a longer discussion of "show versus tell" at the top of this thread) and the other mechanical things I've already noted multiple times.

>Luna noticed her unease.//

Fairly telly, and completely unnecessary, since you go on to describe the symptoms of it very well.

>with no one the wiser//

You repeat that exact phrase just 2 paragraphs apart.

>“But what if we leave the “bug” out of “shape-changing, love-eating, bug-ponies” for just one moment? What if we look at them as just another enemy of the state, and Chrysalis as just another queen? What does that tell us about her?”//

When you have a quotation nested inside another, the inner one(s) use single quotation marks.

>Now that we understand her at least//

Are they really that sure? At this point, it's all still conjecture.

>I already have a spell ready to record transcripts of everything spoken in the throne room and I will send copies to you at regular intervals, as well as to Twilight and Cadance.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Luna nodded firmly at that.//

Unless you have a first-person or third-person limited narrator, it's problematic to use demonstratives (this, that, these, those) by themselves, since they make the narration refer to itself, and thus be self-aware. You could potentially rephrase it, or you could just add an appropriate noun after it so it's not searching for a large chunk of text as an antecedent.

>sister//

Capitalize as a term of address.

>The changelings drew overhead and night fell.//

As written, you need a comma between the clauses, but I wonder if you meant "as" instead of "and."

>night fell//

You repeat this phrase in consecutive sentences without any apparent stylistic purpose in doing so.

>A drone filled the air//

Since you used "drone" earlier to refer to a type of changeling, this could be a little confusing. You use it again a little later.

>The changelings are here in even greater numbers than we thought and it has become clear that we cannot hold the city.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

I'm interested to see where this goes. There could be a lot of reasons why Chrysalis might surrender. Subterfuge? An earnest desire for peace? If only to avoid conflict, the ponies probably would have left them alone if they kept to themselves.

In any case, the only really off putting thing here is the abundance of telly language, which isn't a particularly tough thing to fix. It might help a little to keep an undercurrent of foreboding during the princesses' light moment together to keep the story's mood going, too. As such, I won't need to give it a detailed look again; you can select the "back from Mars" option when you're ready to resubmit.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;guestroom//</span><br />Two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your highness//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;princess//</span><br />As a term of address, this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of consternation//</span><br />Prepositional phrases that communicate a mood stick out like a sore thumb as being telly, and they&#039;re often redundant with information already there. In this case, it&#039;s not, but it wouldn&#039;t take much to show a couple of facial expressions to do this more effectively.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the assembly of petitioners and nobleponies were//</span><br />Subject/verb number. assembly -&gt; were. There is a sense in which this might work, except the behavior here is described as a collective, not individual reactions.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;their attitudes ran the gamut from nervous stoicism to emerging panic//</span><br />Besides being telly, I don&#039;t get this observation. Celestia&#039;s held the perspective, and I&#039;m not sure why she&#039;d note this without saying why she felt it was significant. If she didn&#039;t care, then she probably wouldn&#039;t have picked up on it, so it&#039;s odd to see her spell this out very factually without a reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;steel grey//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your Highness//</span><br />See, it&#039;s inconsistent with the last time you used it. But &quot;Your&quot; would also be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia let her gaze swing out over the assembled ponies.//</span><br />This really doesn&#039;t fit with her attitude. She has a purpose to it, so she does this deliberately, yet it sounds like she&#039;s doing it despite her better judgment, like allowing her mind to wander during a meeting where she should really be paying attention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was plenty of fear and confusion to be seen, but also confidence, love, and trust.//</span><br />Show me some of these. It&#039;d have a lot more impact. A few examples is worth more than a ton of generalities.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of calm serenity//</span><br />There you go again. It&#039;s entirely unnecessary to say this. The fact that she&#039;s trying to control her expression at all says that she wants to appear unaffected.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna’s voice suddenly cut her off, ringing throughout the throne room with firm authority.//</span><br />Two things: 1. The punctuation already told me she got cut off. The narrator doen&#039;t need to reiterate. 2. The fact that the narrator has time to fit this sentence in undercuts the suddenness of the interruption. When there is one, the very next thing should be what interrupts. Anything else you wedge in there hurts the mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sister//</span><br />Another word that should be capitalized as a term of address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia rose and stepped down from the throne to meet her sister, giving her an affectionate nuzzle.//</span><br />Which one of them is giving the nuzzle? It&#039;s a misplaced modifier, as participial phrases often are, but this one is truly ambiguous. By grammatical default, Luna is doing the nuzzling, but many authors using this structure intend Celestia.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia lowered her eyes to the floor//</span><br />Have a look at the first word of the last four paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The changelings are less than two hours away from Canterlot, and the scouts weren’t even able to estimate how many there are; thousands for sure, and probably several times as many as they had during their assault at the wedding.//</span><br />That&#039;s not really a proper use of a semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it. Perhaps a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a relieved smile//</span><br />More telliness.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pricked their ears up with visible eagerness//</span><br />The way it&#039;s described, it&#039;s visible by default.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Should the absolute worst-case scenario comes to pass//</span><br />Verb form typo.<br /><br />At this point, I wonder if this is AU or takes place after A Canterlot Wedding. If the latter, the changelings would already know about the caves, right? Oh, okay, Luna refers to the last incident. So they aren&#039;t going to acknowledge that even though it&#039;s defensible, it&#039;s not secret?<br /><br />Then Luna speaks without interruption for 5 paragraphs. Her only action before doing so is telly, and she doesn&#039;t get an action afterward. That makes it awful hard to picture this in my mind.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;issue - a//</span><br />Use a proper dash, please. There&#039;s a key at the top of this thread for how to space and produce them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your majesty//</span><br />You are very inconsistent in how you capitalize this. Both words should be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;them with//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sigh of relief//</span><br />Another unnecessary/redundant statement of emotion. At this point, suffice it to say you should look out for telly language (there&#039;s a longer discussion of &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread) and the other mechanical things I&#039;ve already noted multiple times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna noticed her unease.//</span><br />Fairly telly, and completely unnecessary, since you go on to describe the symptoms of it very well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with no one the wiser//</span><br />You repeat that exact phrase just 2 paragraphs apart.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“But what if we leave the “bug” out of “shape-changing, love-eating, bug-ponies” for just one moment? What if we look at them as just another enemy of the state, and Chrysalis as just another queen? What does that tell us about her?”//</span><br />When you have a quotation nested inside another, the inner one(s) use single quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now that we understand her at least//</span><br />Are they really that sure? At this point, it&#039;s all still conjecture.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I already have a spell ready to record transcripts of everything spoken in the throne room and I will send copies to you at regular intervals, as well as to Twilight and Cadance.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna nodded firmly at that.//</span><br />Unless you have a first-person or third-person limited narrator, it&#039;s problematic to use demonstratives (this, that, these, those) by themselves, since they make the narration refer to itself, and thus be self-aware. You could potentially rephrase it, or you could just add an appropriate noun after it so it&#039;s not searching for a large chunk of text as an antecedent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sister//</span><br />Capitalize as a term of address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The changelings drew overhead and night fell.//</span><br />As written, you need a comma between the clauses, but I wonder if you meant &quot;as&quot; instead of &quot;and.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;night fell//</span><br />You repeat this phrase in consecutive sentences without any apparent stylistic purpose in doing so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A drone filled the air//</span><br />Since you used &quot;drone&quot; earlier to refer to a type of changeling, this could be a little confusing. You use it again a little later.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The changelings are here in even greater numbers than we thought and it has become clear that we cannot hold the city.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br />I&#039;m interested to see where this goes. There could be a lot of reasons why Chrysalis might surrender. Subterfuge? An earnest desire for peace? If only to avoid conflict, the ponies probably would have left them alone if they kept to themselves.<br /><br />In any case, the only really off putting thing here is the abundance of telly language, which isn&#039;t a particularly tough thing to fix. It might help a little to keep an undercurrent of foreboding during the princesses&#039; light moment together to keep the story&#039;s mood going, too. As such, I won&#039;t need to give it a detailed look again; you can select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option when you&#039;re ready to resubmit.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 319

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

This may be a long enough list to seem intimidating. It really isn't. I was very thorough, and a lot of this is multiple instances of the same things. There's more of an explanation in the wrap-up comments at the end, but first, I want to make it clear that I want to see this story come back so I can post it.

>whole blocks of buildings laid dark and deserted//

Lay/lie confusion. You want "lay" here. "Laid" requires a direct object.

>Shops had cheerfully opened during the day, catering to last-minute shoppers and decorators. But their doors closed early, and their workers were retired to their own homes and parties.//

You basically already said this. In fact, the "were retired to their own homes" part is a direct repetition.

>The illusion would be ruined in a moment upon peering inside.//

I'm seeing a fair amount of passive voice already, not to the point that I'd say it's off-putting yet, but keep it in mind. Most of them would be easy to rephrase in an active manner.

>Heaven//

Why is this capitalized?

>who every pony should at least try to hang out with//

Whom. If you want to be really correct, move the "with" to the front of this phrase.

>Getting your donuts from the café frequented by, say, Fleur De Lis was far and away worth the extra cost.//

This is pretty much the identical information and phrasing you gave me to end the previous paragraph.

I'm three screens in, and it's already starting to drag on me. Here's why:

A lot of the physical description of the restaurant is irrelevant. There's some minimal amount that's necessary to set the scene, and you're far past that. Most of the rest does nothing but reinforce the point you've already made about the place looking run-down. Then we get o the descriptions of the donuts, and the narration even more starts addressing the reader as "you." This can be problematic, as it raises questions about who the narrator is, why he wants to tell me the story, what my role is, and why I want to listen. So when we even start getting dialogue from a generic cardboard cutout of a character, it just cements to me that all the opening so far has been pretty generic.

The reader is here for the characters and the plot. It's a good idea to get to one or the other quickly. There's plenty of time to work in atmosphere, particularly when it's pertinent to what's happening. So far, I have zero idea what the story is about, and absolutely nothing has happened. I've only been introduced to one character, and I barely know anything about him—only that he owns a rough-looking restaurant and is overweight. After this, we finally get into some characterization from him. It would do you well to trim the fat from this introductory section.

>business pony

Probably one word, like "businessman."

>passer-byes//

passersby

>on their way to parties//

Repetitive again. You mentioned ponies on their way to homes, parties, hotels…

>They were always long gone by the time the customers arrived.//

I'm not sure whom "they" refers to here. The ponies on their way to parties? It doesn't really make sense.

>Lightning Dust. The youngest of his regulars, and definitely the easiest on the eyes. She’d probably gotten a lot of praise for her looks, and her athletic frame showed she hadn’t taken them for granted.//

So you're going to shift into a subjective narration in Joe's perspective? This is kind of a jarring disconnect from the voice that you've used up to now, who spoke to the reader and expressed opinions about Joe's restaurant that he wouldn't hold himself.

>99%//

Write it out.

>high risk//

Hyphenate.

>her bits finally ran dry//

Repetitive with the use of "dry" earlier in the paragraph.

>She seemed mad enough to storm out//

Show me. All she's done so far is scowl, so I have no indication of her mood, except that the narrator's told me very bluntly here, but I don't get to see it.

>Rolling her eyes in the most exaggerated motion she could manage//

Why the shift into Lightning's perspective here? Joe wouldn't know what she could or couldn't manage. Honestly, I'd cut all of this phrase after "eyes."

>her sulky chewing lost to the distance//

"Lost to the distance" is kind of an awkward phrasing, and if it really is lost, how does Joe hear it?

>to never//

Swap these words.

>triggered by Gilda of all ponies//

Gilda's not a pony…

>27//

Spell it out.

>“I’m surprised to see you tonight, Blues.” Lightning offered.//

Dialogue punctuation.

>Blueblood pressed his lips//

Did you mean "pursed"?

>Yo Donut Pony!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>’Evening//

Why the apostrophe? What letters is he skipping?

>with disinterested courtesy//

Given that you've been taking a subjective narration in Joe's viewpoint, "disinterested" is an odd comment for him to make about himself. This would get across better with an internal comment of his that shows him acting disinterested.

>less interested than he sounded//

Again, this comes across as a very external evaluation from what should be his viewpoint.

>Working with the bear claws, Joe ducked his head lower to hide his eye-roll. That was her third job this month.//

Since I've made the above comment a couple of times now, here's a spot where it's done right. It's limited to his own perceptions, intents, and opinions, and rendered in a way that sounds like his own internal monologue.

>Already, Gilda was complaining that some places were blackballing her.//

This sounds pretty repetitive with Lightning's situation.

>which led to the claw-shaped scar on his shoulder//

This begs for more. Wouldn't that make him more wary of her? Why did he just let it go, rather than call the police? Or if he did, why would he think she might do that again?

>Yo~//

~ is not proper punctuation.

>A disappointed few seconds passed.//

For whom? The narrator's with Joe, so I'd have to assume him, but he has no reason to be.

>Rent//

Why is this capitalized?

>Lost in his worries, Joe had no idea how long it was until the door opened once more.//

You're in his head. So are these worries. So why don't I get to see them? You're forcing me out of his perspective like this. And shouldn't the door opening surprise him if he wasn't paying attention.

>showmare//

Inconsistent with you spelling it as two words in the last paragraph.

>That was part of why Joe liked her. He was sorta the same, going for hard independence over safe employment.//

Seems like a colon might work better between these.

>apologized//

Would be illustrative if I could see this and her reaction.

>Thanks Joe//

Comma for direct address.

>Even the laconic Joe//

You already described him as such, and recently enough that I remember it clearly.

>gaze fixed on Joe. It was certainly a gaze//

The repetition isn't done in a way that feels deliberate or creates an effect.

>“You are ‘Joe?’” She asked//

Capitalization.

>Joe nodded, stepping back behind the counter//

Missing end punctuation.

>Very well, ‘Joe.’//

I'm not sure why she's continuing to put his name in quotes. She knows it's correct now.

>He’d been in business a decade, and heard stranger requests//

That's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>Heaths//

Hearth's

>It couldn’t put bits in their pockets, or love in their hearts.//

All one clause. No comma.

>when all the smiling ponies were at their parties//

Enough with the parties already.

>well-matching//

In this usage, you don't need the hyphen.

>Not wanting conversation//

Another instance where an internal comment would be far more powerful than a narrative summary.

>three-hundred//

No hyphen.

>teary with fear//

The tears alone aren't going to connote fear. What else does he see? Show me that instead of just summarizing it as fear.

>“Why doesn’t she come inside?” He grumbled.//

Capitalization. You get it right when the dialogue ends in a comma, so I'm not sure why the question marks are causing you trouble.

>brow furrowed in confusion//

Another rather external assessment that should be rendered through the perspective instead.

>Pausing a moment to lock the cashbox, Joe stepped out from behind the counter.//

Note that participles synchronize actions. So he pauses at the same time he steps out. It'd more reasonably happen one after the other.

>lycanthropy//

Be careful with the big words. Using them in his perspective implies that it's a word he knows and would be inclined to use. You have to make sure that fits his characterization.

>he slammed the door behind him//

I'm surprised he does this, since he was upset about the possibility of Gilda doing so.

>With the moon occluded//

Another word choice that seems pretty highbrow for him.

>“Kid,” he said; not unkindly, but gruffly.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it.

>He was a gruff pony//

You just said that, and there are ways you make repetition feel deliberate and meaningful. I don't see any here.

>and more tears were slowly being added to them//

That's an awkward phrasing and a pretty clunky use of passive voice.

>between a shiver//

"Between shivers," right? She can't exactly say something between only one.

>quizzically//

How does this look?

>Where’s home for you, kid?//

Look how often he's already used direct address with her. Then consider how often people actually do so in real conversations.

>in embarrassment//

Don't just tell me she's embarrassed. Make her look and act embarrassed. Par tof making a connection with a character is interpreting such cues, which makes the reader see things through her eyes for a moment. That's how we naturally read others' emotions anyway. It's much more engaging than just having the narrator sum it all up in a word or two, which short-circuits that discovery process. (First-person narrators are a notable exception, at least as far as their own emotions are concerned.)

>my class came for the big play and I//

Ooh. Sounds like Cheerilee's going to be in big trouble.

>can-“//

>even-“//
>any-“//
>she-“//
>and-“//
>Instead-“//
>to-“//
>not-“//
>sappy-“//
Use a proper dash, and note that dash use can break smart quotes. These are backward.

>approvingly//

Get at this through his commentary. Most adverbs are going to break you out of a subjective feel to the narration.

>Joe cut her off.//

You don't need to tell me this. It's already apparent from the punctuation.

>eager and young//

You already described him as young.

>Or-//

Use a dash.

>“You know if the sky chariots are running?” He blurted before giving himself a chance to reconsider.//

Capitalization.

>Lighting//

Typo. As I look ahead, you make the same one two more times, so search for this spelling.

>had pulled her chair closer to the window, and was suddenly faking a talk with Trixie.//

No comma.

>act nonchalant, but the poor act//

Watch the repetition.

>their silent interest//

You just referred to "their interest" two sentences ago.

>His whistled innocently//

Typo.

>Three-hundred//

No hyphen.

>Pastries//

Why is this capitalized?

>The bag went into his apron pocket and Joe walked slowly to the door//

Here's a case where there are separate clauses, so you do need a comma.

>Sir//

That wouldn't be capitalized unless it's a title of knighthood.

>She gave a hard, wintry cough into her forehoof and the smile grew.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Joe met her eyes, and finally smiled back.//

No comma.

>half-heartedly//

halfheartedly

>all’s//

That's a really odd usage. How about "everyone's"?

>thoughts were on the strange thing they had just witnessed//

How does Joe know this?

>Bringing his head back up//

Participial phrases are usually set off with a comma.

>four-hundred//

No hyphen.

>He pushed the treat across the counter to her, smiling faintly.//

You've had a number of participial phrases that were misplaced modifiers, but they weren't bad ones, so I let them go. This one is actually ambiguous, though. These phrases like to modify the nearest prior object, or if they start a clause, its subject. So the grammatical presumption is that Trixie is smiling faintly. But most authors using this construction intend for it to modify Joe. If it only makes logical sense for it to describe one of the possibilities, then it's a minor blip, but here, I can't tell which one.

>B-But//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the firsst instance in a stutter.

>“”Don’t worry about it,”//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>”Filliiiiiiies and gentlecolts!” She boomed//

Capitalization, and the opening quotation marks are backward, as smart quotes sometimes do with a bbcode tag.

>sparks cackled in the air//

"Crackled," maybe?

>looking very surprised//

And what does that look like?

>An applause//

I've never seen that used as anything other that a collective noun, i.e., it doesn't take an indefinite article.

>Shrimp//

Unless it's actually a nickname she uses specifically and repeatedly for Trixie (and they haven't been suggested to have any sort of relationship where this might reasonably occur), it's just a generic term, and it wouldn't be capitalized.

>semi-circle//

semicircle

>sarcastically//

It loses its impact if you have to tell me this. It's like informing me that a joke was funny. Let what she says and how she says it deliver the sarcasm.

>ruining what little mystique Trixie had built//

How so? You've been in Joe's head, so you can't really talk to things beyond how he feels about it personally and how he sees the others act.

>why are my pants red?//

She's presenting it as dialogue, so it does need capitalization and a comma.

>WOAH//

Please don't be one of those authors who can't spell this. You got it right earlier.

>She was holding a hoof to her mouth to hide a grimace that happened to be upside-down.//

This is phrased more as her own reasons for doing so than Joe's perception of it.

>Lightning seemed curious//

What does she do to make her seem so?

>cutie-mark//

Canon doesn't hyphenate this.

>Second question, if I may: What are those?//

You typically only capitalize after a colon if what comes before it refers to multiple sentences.

>“Little experiment of mine,” Joe tilted the tray, giving everypony a better look.//

You've punctuated that like it's a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>Joe’s explanation was bashful.//

You're getting external to him again. Let this come through in how he delivers his explanation.

>“Dang,” Gilda whistled low, eyeing the portions.//

Another attribution without a speaking verb.

>two-dozen//

No hyphen.

>‘em//

Another thing that always breaks smart quotes is a leading apostrophe. This is backward. You can force one the right way by adding a second and deleting the first or by pasting one in from somewhere else.

>wheedling smile on her face//

Missing word.

>Joe said by way of answer//

Given that he was answering her, that's pretty redundant.

>The older mare gave a slight ‘hmf,’ and feigned disinterest.//

No comma.

>”Eques-TREE-uh//

Backward quotes.

>Harshwhinny grumbling about how ponies had ‘hair,’ not ‘fur,’//

Thank you!

>yawn in boredom//

The yawn already connotes boredom. Cut that prepositional phrase.

>“We need a ‘game’ game!” She clarified.//

Capitalization.

>pouted sulkily//

The "sulkily" is telly and redundant with the pouting.

>“Yo Joe, Blues,” Gilda called, grinning fearlessly. “I mean… we do got cones…”//

Is there a scene break here? There's an extra blank line, but no marker.

>The chaotic game stopped, ponies looking to his reaction//

That "to" feels awkward. And the few paragraphs around here don't have a clear perspective. You don't constantly have to chime in from the viewpoint character, but it helps to check in every few paragraphs at least.

>the food fight began in full.//

And again, is there a scene break here? There wouldn't have to be, but you've left a ton of empty space.

>as he glanced to the clock//

Another weird "to" where I would have figured an "at."

>looking at clocks//

Wait, how many are there? Joe was described as looking at "the" clock, as in the only one.

>was almost at an end//

Just a couple paragraphs ago, it was described as having already ended.

>Y-You//

Only capitalize the first.

>Joe could charge him for the trays they ate, and return the rest.//

No comma.

>closest her ever came//

Typo

>He shouldered the door open without breaking stride, and was gone the next moment.//

No comma.

>“And I want you to kiss me!” She blurted//

Capitalization.

>Moron//

Why is this capitalized?

>and-//

Use a dash.

>“That is…” he lowered the hoof and coughed to the side//

Capitalization.

>hastily-formed//

You don't need a hyphen in two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb.

>Woah//

Dammit

>his own confidence growing//

>And in his face, she saw that mean smirk return.//
See the perspective switch? It's a short enough scene that there's really no reason to wander out of a single viewpoint. And why is the whole thing in italics? That just gets annoying to read. They're generally used for presenting flashbacks, dreams, or written material. It took me a while to realize this wasn't just something Joe was imagining. It'll be clear what's going off, since this appears to be set off as a separate scene. I'd encourage you to use the bbcode [hr] as a scene marker. instead of the varying number of blank lines you have now.

>with apprehension//

Show it.

>Trixie was picking lazily at her pretzel bun and Harshwhinny was simply sitting back in her chair//

Comma between the clauses.

>well-familiar//

No hyphen.

>they know who to blame//

"Whom," if you figure she's the kind of character who would know that. I do.

>the brain behind them hardly daring to hope//

(this is Trixie)
>amused that the stern mare seemed so dense//
(this is Lightning)
Another jarring perspective shift.

>Sapphire Shore’s//

Her name is Sapphire Shores, so it might affect how you want to handle the apostrophe.

>Life//

Why is this capitalized?

>For Trixie and Lightning, of course, it wasn’t chickenfeed. It was more money than they’d ever seen in their lives, and it took another few dumbstruck seconds before they realized it was walking away.//

For my money (heh), you could cut this entire paragraph. It's rather blunt, and what's around it already gives that impression.

>WAIT!//

Italics are preferred over all caps or bold for emphasis.

>merrily-thrown//

No hyphen.

>Schnapps//

lower caseNote that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />This may be a long enough list to seem intimidating. It really isn&#039;t. I was very thorough, and a lot of this is multiple instances of the same things. There&#039;s more of an explanation in the wrap-up comments at the end, but first, I want to make it clear that I want to see this story come back so I can post it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whole blocks of buildings laid dark and deserted//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion. You want &quot;lay&quot; here. &quot;Laid&quot; requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shops had cheerfully opened during the day, catering to last-minute shoppers and decorators. But their doors closed early, and their workers were retired to their own homes and parties.//</span><br />You basically already said this. In fact, the &quot;were retired to their own homes&quot; part is a direct repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The illusion would be ruined in a moment upon peering inside.//</span><br />I&#039;m seeing a fair amount of passive voice already, not to the point that I&#039;d say it&#039;s off-putting yet, but keep it in mind. Most of them would be easy to rephrase in an active manner.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Heaven//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who every pony should at least try to hang out with//</span><br />Whom. If you want to be really correct, move the &quot;with&quot; to the front of this phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Getting your donuts from the café frequented by, say, Fleur De Lis was far and away worth the extra cost.//</span><br />This is pretty much the identical information and phrasing you gave me to end the previous paragraph.<br /><br />I&#039;m three screens in, and it&#039;s already starting to drag on me. Here&#039;s why:<br /><br />A lot of the physical description of the restaurant is irrelevant. There&#039;s some minimal amount that&#039;s necessary to set the scene, and you&#039;re far past that. Most of the rest does nothing but reinforce the point you&#039;ve already made about the place looking run-down. Then we get o the descriptions of the donuts, and the narration even more starts addressing the reader as &quot;you.&quot; This can be problematic, as it raises questions about who the narrator is, why he wants to tell me the story, what my role is, and why I want to listen. So when we even start getting dialogue from a generic cardboard cutout of a character, it just cements to me that all the opening so far has been pretty generic.<br /><br />The reader is here for the characters and the plot. It&#039;s a good idea to get to one or the other quickly. There&#039;s plenty of time to work in atmosphere, particularly when it&#039;s pertinent to what&#039;s happening. So far, I have zero idea what the story is about, and absolutely nothing has happened. I&#039;ve only been introduced to one character, and I barely know anything about him—only that he owns a rough-looking restaurant and is overweight. After this, we finally get into some characterization from him. It would do you well to trim the fat from this introductory section.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;business pony</span><br />Probably one word, like &quot;businessman.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;passer-byes//</span><br />passersby<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on their way to parties//</span><br />Repetitive again. You mentioned ponies on their way to homes, parties, hotels…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They were always long gone by the time the customers arrived.//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure whom &quot;they&quot; refers to here. The ponies on their way to parties? It doesn&#039;t really make sense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lightning Dust. The youngest of his regulars, and definitely the easiest on the eyes. She’d probably gotten a lot of praise for her looks, and her athletic frame showed she hadn’t taken them for granted.//</span><br />So you&#039;re going to shift into a subjective narration in Joe&#039;s perspective? This is kind of a jarring disconnect from the voice that you&#039;ve used up to now, who spoke to the reader and expressed opinions about Joe&#039;s restaurant that he wouldn&#039;t hold himself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;99%//</span><br />Write it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high risk//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her bits finally ran dry//</span><br />Repetitive with the use of &quot;dry&quot; earlier in the paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She seemed mad enough to storm out//</span><br />Show me. All she&#039;s done so far is scowl, so I have no indication of her mood, except that the narrator&#039;s told me very bluntly here, but I don&#039;t get to see it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rolling her eyes in the most exaggerated motion she could manage//</span><br />Why the shift into Lightning&#039;s perspective here? Joe wouldn&#039;t know what she could or couldn&#039;t manage. Honestly, I&#039;d cut all of this phrase after &quot;eyes.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her sulky chewing lost to the distance//</span><br />&quot;Lost to the distance&quot; is kind of an awkward phrasing, and if it really is lost, how does Joe hear it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to never//</span><br />Swap these words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;triggered by Gilda of all ponies//</span><br />Gilda&#039;s not a pony…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;27//</span><br />Spell it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I’m surprised to see you tonight, Blues.” Lightning offered.//</span><br />Dialogue punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Blueblood pressed his lips//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;pursed&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yo Donut Pony!//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;’Evening//</span><br />Why the apostrophe? What letters is he skipping?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with disinterested courtesy//</span><br />Given that you&#039;ve been taking a subjective narration in Joe&#039;s viewpoint, &quot;disinterested&quot; is an odd comment for him to make about himself. This would get across better with an internal comment of his that shows him acting disinterested.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;less interested than he sounded//</span><br />Again, this comes across as a very external evaluation from what should be his viewpoint.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Working with the bear claws, Joe ducked his head lower to hide his eye-roll. That was her third job this month.//</span><br />Since I&#039;ve made the above comment a couple of times now, here&#039;s a spot where it&#039;s done right. It&#039;s limited to his own perceptions, intents, and opinions, and rendered in a way that sounds like his own internal monologue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Already, Gilda was complaining that some places were blackballing her.//</span><br />This sounds pretty repetitive with Lightning&#039;s situation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which led to the claw-shaped scar on his shoulder//</span><br />This begs for more. Wouldn&#039;t that make him more wary of her? Why did he just let it go, rather than call the police? Or if he did, why would he think she might do that again?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yo~//</span><br />~ is not proper punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A disappointed few seconds passed.//</span><br />For whom? The narrator&#039;s with Joe, so I&#039;d have to assume him, but he has no reason to be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rent//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lost in his worries, Joe had no idea how long it was until the door opened once more.//</span><br />You&#039;re in his head. So are these worries. So why don&#039;t I get to see them? You&#039;re forcing me out of his perspective like this. And shouldn&#039;t the door opening surprise him if he wasn&#039;t paying attention.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;showmare//</span><br />Inconsistent with you spelling it as two words in the last paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That was part of why Joe liked her. He was sorta the same, going for hard independence over safe employment.//</span><br />Seems like a colon might work better between these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;apologized//</span><br />Would be illustrative if I could see this and her reaction.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thanks Joe//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even the laconic Joe//</span><br />You already described him as such, and recently enough that I remember it clearly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gaze fixed on Joe. It was certainly a gaze//</span><br />The repetition isn&#039;t done in a way that feels deliberate or creates an effect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You are ‘Joe?’” She asked//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Joe nodded, stepping back behind the counter//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Very well, ‘Joe.’//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure why she&#039;s continuing to put his name in quotes. She knows it&#039;s correct now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He’d been in business a decade, and heard stranger requests//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Heaths//</span><br />Hearth&#039;s<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It couldn’t put bits in their pockets, or love in their hearts.//</span><br />All one clause. No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when all the smiling ponies were at their parties//</span><br />Enough with the parties already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well-matching//</span><br />In this usage, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not wanting conversation//</span><br />Another instance where an internal comment would be far more powerful than a narrative summary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;three-hundred//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;teary with fear//</span><br />The tears alone aren&#039;t going to connote fear. What else does he see? Show me that instead of just summarizing it as fear.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Why doesn’t she come inside?” He grumbled.//</span><br />Capitalization. You get it right when the dialogue ends in a comma, so I&#039;m not sure why the question marks are causing you trouble.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;brow furrowed in confusion//</span><br />Another rather external assessment that should be rendered through the perspective instead.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pausing a moment to lock the cashbox, Joe stepped out from behind the counter.//</span><br />Note that participles synchronize actions. So he pauses at the same time he steps out. It&#039;d more reasonably happen one after the other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lycanthropy//</span><br />Be careful with the big words. Using them in his perspective implies that it&#039;s a word he knows and would be inclined to use. You have to make sure that fits his characterization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he slammed the door behind him//</span><br />I&#039;m surprised he does this, since he was upset about the possibility of Gilda doing so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With the moon occluded//</span><br />Another word choice that seems pretty highbrow for him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Kid,” he said; not unkindly, but gruffly.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was a gruff pony//</span><br />You just said that, and there are ways you make repetition feel deliberate and meaningful. I don&#039;t see any here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and more tears were slowly being added to them//</span><br />That&#039;s an awkward phrasing and a pretty clunky use of passive voice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;between a shiver//</span><br />&quot;Between shivers,&quot; right? She can&#039;t exactly say something between only one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quizzically//</span><br />How does this look?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Where’s home for you, kid?//</span><br />Look how often he&#039;s already used direct address with her. Then consider how often people actually do so in real conversations.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in embarrassment//</span><br />Don&#039;t just tell me she&#039;s embarrassed. Make her look and act embarrassed. Par tof making a connection with a character is interpreting such cues, which makes the reader see things through her eyes for a moment. That&#039;s how we naturally read others&#039; emotions anyway. It&#039;s much more engaging than just having the narrator sum it all up in a word or two, which short-circuits that discovery process. (First-person narrators are a notable exception, at least as far as their own emotions are concerned.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my class came for the big play and I//</span><br />Ooh. Sounds like Cheerilee&#039;s going to be in big trouble.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;can-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;any-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Instead-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;not-“//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sappy-“//</span><br />Use a proper dash, and note that dash use can break smart quotes. These are backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;approvingly//</span><br />Get at this through his commentary. Most adverbs are going to break you out of a subjective feel to the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Joe cut her off.//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to tell me this. It&#039;s already apparent from the punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eager and young//</span><br />You already described him as young.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Or-//</span><br />Use a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You know if the sky chariots are running?” He blurted before giving himself a chance to reconsider.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lighting//</span><br />Typo. As I look ahead, you make the same one two more times, so search for this spelling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;had pulled her chair closer to the window, and was suddenly faking a talk with Trixie.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;act nonchalant, but the poor act//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;their silent interest//</span><br />You just referred to &quot;their interest&quot; two sentences ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His whistled innocently//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Three-hundred//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pastries//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The bag went into his apron pocket and Joe walked slowly to the door//</span><br />Here&#039;s a case where there are separate clauses, so you do need a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sir//</span><br />That wouldn&#039;t be capitalized unless it&#039;s a title of knighthood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She gave a hard, wintry cough into her forehoof and the smile grew.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Joe met her eyes, and finally smiled back.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half-heartedly//</span><br />halfheartedly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all’s//</span><br />That&#039;s a really odd usage. How about &quot;everyone&#039;s&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thoughts were on the strange thing they had just witnessed//</span><br />How does Joe know this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bringing his head back up//</span><br />Participial phrases are usually set off with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;four-hundred//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He pushed the treat across the counter to her, smiling faintly.//</span><br />You&#039;ve had a number of participial phrases that were misplaced modifiers, but they weren&#039;t bad ones, so I let them go. This one is actually ambiguous, though. These phrases like to modify the nearest prior object, or if they start a clause, its subject. So the grammatical presumption is that Trixie is smiling faintly. But most authors using this construction intend for it to modify Joe. If it only makes logical sense for it to describe one of the possibilities, then it&#039;s a minor blip, but here, I can&#039;t tell which one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;B-But//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only do so with the firsst instance in a stutter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“”Don’t worry about it,”//</span><br />Extraneous quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;”Filliiiiiiies and gentlecolts!” She boomed//</span><br />Capitalization, and the opening quotation marks are backward, as smart quotes sometimes do with a bbcode tag.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sparks cackled in the air//</span><br />&quot;Crackled,&quot; maybe?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking very surprised//</span><br />And what does that look like?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;An applause//</span><br />I&#039;ve never seen that used as anything other that a collective noun, i.e., it doesn&#039;t take an indefinite article.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shrimp//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s actually a nickname she uses specifically and repeatedly for Trixie (and they haven&#039;t been suggested to have any sort of relationship where this might reasonably occur), it&#039;s just a generic term, and it wouldn&#039;t be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;semi-circle//</span><br />semicircle<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sarcastically//</span><br />It loses its impact if you have to tell me this. It&#039;s like informing me that a joke was funny. Let what she says and how she says it deliver the sarcasm.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ruining what little mystique Trixie had built//</span><br />How so? You&#039;ve been in Joe&#039;s head, so you can&#039;t really talk to things beyond how he feels about it personally and how he sees the others act.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;why are my pants red?//</span><br />She&#039;s presenting it as dialogue, so it does need capitalization and a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;WOAH//</span><br />Please don&#039;t be one of those authors who can&#039;t spell this. You got it right earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was holding a hoof to her mouth to hide a grimace that happened to be upside-down.//</span><br />This is phrased more as her own reasons for doing so than Joe&#039;s perception of it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lightning seemed curious//</span><br />What does she do to make her seem so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cutie-mark//</span><br />Canon doesn&#039;t hyphenate this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Second question, if I may: What are those?//</span><br />You typically only capitalize after a colon if what comes before it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Little experiment of mine,” Joe tilted the tray, giving everypony a better look.//</span><br />You&#039;ve punctuated that like it&#039;s a speech attribution, but there&#039;s no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Joe’s explanation was bashful.//</span><br />You&#039;re getting external to him again. Let this come through in how he delivers his explanation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Dang,” Gilda whistled low, eyeing the portions.//</span><br />Another attribution without a speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;two-dozen//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Another thing that always breaks smart quotes is a leading apostrophe. This is backward. You can force one the right way by adding a second and deleting the first or by pasting one in from somewhere else.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wheedling smile on her face//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Joe said by way of answer//</span><br />Given that he was answering her, that&#039;s pretty redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The older mare gave a slight ‘hmf,’ and feigned disinterest.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;”Eques-TREE-uh//</span><br />Backward quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Harshwhinny grumbling about how ponies had ‘hair,’ not ‘fur,’//</span><br />Thank you!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yawn in boredom//</span><br />The yawn already connotes boredom. Cut that prepositional phrase.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“We need a ‘game’ game!” She clarified.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pouted sulkily//</span><br />The &quot;sulkily&quot; is telly and redundant with the pouting.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yo Joe, Blues,” Gilda called, grinning fearlessly. “I mean… we do got cones…”//</span><br />Is there a scene break here? There&#039;s an extra blank line, but no marker.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The chaotic game stopped, ponies looking to his reaction//</span><br />That &quot;to&quot; feels awkward. And the few paragraphs around here don&#039;t have a clear perspective. You don&#039;t constantly have to chime in from the viewpoint character, but it helps to check in every few paragraphs at least.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the food fight began in full.//</span><br />And again, is there a scene break here? There wouldn&#039;t have to be, but you&#039;ve left a ton of empty space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as he glanced to the clock//</span><br />Another weird &quot;to&quot; where I would have figured an &quot;at.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking at clocks//</span><br />Wait, how many are there? Joe was described as looking at &quot;the&quot; clock, as in the only one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was almost at an end//</span><br />Just a couple paragraphs ago, it was described as having already ended.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Y-You//</span><br />Only capitalize the first.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Joe could charge him for the trays they ate, and return the rest.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;closest her ever came//</span><br />Typo<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He shouldered the door open without breaking stride, and was gone the next moment.//</span><br />No comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“And I want you to kiss me!” She blurted//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Moron//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and-//</span><br />Use a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“That is…” he lowered the hoof and coughed to the side//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hastily-formed//</span><br />You don&#039;t need a hyphen in two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Woah//</span><br />Dammit<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his own confidence growing//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And in his face, she saw that mean smirk return.//</span><br />See the perspective switch? It&#039;s a short enough scene that there&#039;s really no reason to wander out of a single viewpoint. And why is the whole thing in italics? That just gets annoying to read. They&#039;re generally used for presenting flashbacks, dreams, or written material. It took me a while to realize this wasn&#039;t just something Joe was imagining. It&#039;ll be clear what&#039;s going off, since this appears to be set off as a separate scene. I&#039;d encourage you to use the bbcode [hr] as a scene marker. instead of the varying number of blank lines you have now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with apprehension//</span><br />Show it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Trixie was picking lazily at her pretzel bun and Harshwhinny was simply sitting back in her chair//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;well-familiar//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they know who to blame//</span><br />&quot;Whom,&quot; if you figure she&#039;s the kind of character who would know that. I do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the brain behind them hardly daring to hope//</span><br />(this is Trixie)<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;amused that the stern mare seemed so dense//</span><br />(this is Lightning)<br />Another jarring perspective shift.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sapphire Shore’s//</span><br />Her name is Sapphire Shores, so it might affect how you want to handle the apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Life//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For Trixie and Lightning, of course, it wasn’t chickenfeed. It was more money than they’d ever seen in their lives, and it took another few dumbstruck seconds before they realized it was walking away.//</span><br />For my money (heh), you could cut this entire paragraph. It&#039;s rather blunt, and what&#039;s around it already gives that impression.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;WAIT!//</span><br />Italics are preferred over all caps or bold for emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;merrily-thrown//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Schnapps//</span><br />lower case<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 320

Okay, wrap-up time. I get that he realizes Celestia's involvement, but thank her for what? Giving the opportunity or the encouragement to do something good? Or that she somehow motivated Blueblood to pay him all that money?

I know this looks like a lot. Really, it isn't. It's a bunch of instances of a small number of problems noted over and over. I've pointed them all out and said exactly how to fix them. The bulk of this will be no more than an editing pass. I've tried to remove the pain as much as possible, because I like this story and want to expedite it to get posted by Christmas if I can. That part's up to you. If you can get it fixed up within the next few days, it'll probably happen.

The only things that will take a bit of thought to work out are these: the instances of telly language, the jumping perspectives, and the mismatched opening scene. Really, that last one is the only one that'll take much thought. If you'd had a narrator break in with that tone throughout the story, it'd work, but it just sticks out like a sore thumb as is. You could easily convey the same information in a style more in keeping with the rest of the story.

For reference, there's a little more information at the top of this thread on some of the topics I've brought up. Specifically, I'd point you to the sections on dialogue punctuation/capitalization, comma use with conjunctions, and head hopping.

The last thing I'll add is that this story uses a lot of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about things that happen, not that just are. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 352 in the story, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. You'd really benefit from making more active verb choices. This can work even when there's not actually any motion, as in "He sat there" versus "He was there." One helps keep the story moving. The other brings the action to a halt. Now, it didn't grate on me too badly, except in a couple of places where I encountered clumps of them, so in the interest of time, I'll just ask you to consider swapping a few out when you encounter them in passages you're working on anyway. I won't make you scour the whole story for them, unless you want to. Just keep it in mind for your future writing.

Hope to see this story come back soon!Okay, wrap-up time. I get that he realizes Celestia&#039;s involvement, but thank her for what? Giving the opportunity or the encouragement to do something good? Or that she somehow motivated Blueblood to pay him all that money?<br /><br />I know this looks like a lot. Really, it isn&#039;t. It&#039;s a bunch of instances of a small number of problems noted over and over. I&#039;ve pointed them all out and said exactly how to fix them. The bulk of this will be no more than an editing pass. I&#039;ve tried to remove the pain as much as possible, because I like this story and want to expedite it to get posted by Christmas if I can. That part&#039;s up to you. If you can get it fixed up within the next few days, it&#039;ll probably happen.<br /><br />The only things that will take a bit of thought to work out are these: the instances of telly language, the jumping perspectives, and the mismatched opening scene. Really, that last one is the only one that&#039;ll take much thought. If you&#039;d had a narrator break in with that tone throughout the story, it&#039;d work, but it just sticks out like a sore thumb as is. You could easily convey the same information in a style more in keeping with the rest of the story.<br /><br />For reference, there&#039;s a little more information at the top of this thread on some of the topics I&#039;ve brought up. Specifically, I&#039;d point you to the sections on dialogue punctuation/capitalization, comma use with conjunctions, and head hopping.<br /><br />The last thing I&#039;ll add is that this story uses a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. They&#039;re inherently boring. It&#039;s much more interesting to read about things that happen, not that just are. Of the easier forms to search on, I counted 352 in the story, which is a rate of about one every other sentence. You&#039;d really benefit from making more active verb choices. This can work even when there&#039;s not actually any motion, as in &quot;He sat there&quot; versus &quot;He was there.&quot; One helps keep the story moving. The other brings the action to a halt. Now, it didn&#039;t grate on me too badly, except in a couple of places where I encountered clumps of them, so in the interest of time, I&#039;ll just ask you to consider swapping a few out when you encounter them in passages you&#039;re working on anyway. I won&#039;t make you scour the whole story for them, unless you want to. Just keep it in mind for your future writing.<br /><br />Hope to see this story come back soon!<br />

OroboroCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 321

>>131313

Thanks for taking the time to review and point out errors.

Ultimately, this is my fault for getting impatient with my editor's tardiness and thinking I was okay to jump the gun without him. I've learned my lesson. (Though he still hasn't, lazy bastard. (He's my brother, I wouldn't be so mean to a regular editor. :P))

He's finally gotten around to editing it now, and I've gone and implemented most of the grammatical changes as well. I'll likely submit it later today, after figuring out if there's any story stuff I can change easily.

Ultimately, I was trying to capture two different feelings from this fic. From Apple Bloom's perspective, the frustration of being a kid and having to deal with a drunk adult who you normally trust and rely on, and it puts you in the weird position where you suddenly have to be the mature one.

From Applejack's level, she's hit that level of drunkenness where you suddenly really, really have some idea or thought or something you want to convey and it seems like the most important thing in the world all, but inebriation leaves her unable to properly get her point across.

The story is ultimately nonsense, just something cute AJ's mom made up in order to entertain her. To Applejack, it's a vague memory of warmth and safety and an ultimate trust in someone above her and an assurance that everything will always be okay. But she has absolutely no idea how to convey that message and feeling to Apple Bloom.

There's a bit of subtle foreshadowing in the fic already: Pinkie is worried when Apple Bloom mentions family troubles, Granny is making a big issue out of a routine pregnancy and "you know how she gets", Applejack's story in general is very maternal and apple focused.

Apple Bloom doesn't pick up on any of it until the end because she's grumpy and is focused on her own problems / annoyance at having to deal with Applejack as she is. Applejack's doing a terrible job of it, but she's trying to reach out to Apple Bloom and Apple Bloom isn't really listening.

Anyway, those are just my own thoughts on the story and what I was trying to accomplish while writing it. Maybe I should have tried doing it drunk. :3

Thanks again for the input,

-Oroboro<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131313" onclick="return highlight('131313', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131313">&gt;&gt;131313</a><br /><br />Thanks for taking the time to review and point out errors.<br /><br />Ultimately, this is my fault for getting impatient with my editor&#039;s tardiness and thinking I was okay to jump the gun without him. I&#039;ve learned my lesson. (Though he still hasn&#039;t, lazy bastard. (He&#039;s my brother, I wouldn&#039;t be so mean to a regular editor. :P))<br /><br />He&#039;s finally gotten around to editing it now, and I&#039;ve gone and implemented most of the grammatical changes as well. I&#039;ll likely submit it later today, after figuring out if there&#039;s any story stuff I can change easily.<br /><br />Ultimately, I was trying to capture two different feelings from this fic. From Apple Bloom&#039;s perspective, the frustration of being a kid and having to deal with a drunk adult who you normally trust and rely on, and it puts you in the weird position where you suddenly have to be the mature one. <br /><br />From Applejack&#039;s level, she&#039;s hit that level of drunkenness where you suddenly really, really have some idea or thought or something you want to convey and it seems like the most important thing in the world all, but inebriation leaves her unable to properly get her point across. <br /><br />The story is ultimately nonsense, just something cute AJ&#039;s mom made up in order to entertain her. To Applejack, it&#039;s a vague memory of warmth and safety and an ultimate trust in someone above her and an assurance that everything will always be okay. But she has absolutely no idea how to convey that message and feeling to Apple Bloom.<br /><br />There&#039;s a bit of subtle foreshadowing in the fic already: Pinkie is worried when Apple Bloom mentions family troubles, Granny is making a big issue out of a routine pregnancy and &quot;you know how she gets&quot;, Applejack&#039;s story in general is very maternal and apple focused. <br /><br />Apple Bloom doesn&#039;t pick up on any of it until the end because she&#039;s grumpy and is focused on her own problems / annoyance at having to deal with Applejack as she is. Applejack&#039;s doing a terrible job of it, but she&#039;s trying to reach out to Apple Bloom and Apple Bloom isn&#039;t really listening. <br /><br />Anyway, those are just my own thoughts on the story and what I was trying to accomplish while writing it. Maybe I should have tried doing it drunk. :3<br /><br />Thanks again for the input,<br /><br />-Oroboro<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 322

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>had ran//

had run

>"…" he continued.//

That may cut it in video game dialogue, but not here. Describe what he's doing instead of giving me a blank.

>he'd never lain a hoof on her//

You need "laid." there. "Lain" is intransitive.

>It's about…" Here Inkie made a sweeping gesture to encompass the living room, the farmhouse, and presumably, all that lay beyond. "…this."//

This is the standard way to to a narrative aside in a quote:
It's about—" here Inkie made a sweeping gesture to encompass the living room, the farmhouse, and presumably, all that lay beyond "—this."
in the cae where she stops speaking for the action, or:
It's about"—here Inkie made a sweeping gesture to encompass the living room, the farmhouse, and presumably, all that lay beyond—"this."
if she doesn't.

>A pained expression//

>Inkie asked incredulously//
>Looking bewildered//
You did alright in the early going, but here, I'm hitting a number of spots where the emotional imformation is pretty telly at a time where it's pretty important to the plot. This pops up intermittently, so keep an eye out for it.

>Father tried to ignore them, but he could feel Blinkie's eyes on the back of his head.//

Why are you shifting over to his perspective here? This is information only he could know, but the whole things had been from Inkie's viewpoint so far.

>For awhile//

In a usage like this, where a noun is required, you need "a while" to be two words.

>She didn't look uncomfortable with her sister's affection, just embarrassed, as if someone had just told a rather personal story about her at some kind of get-together.//

You have a nice image there, so why preface it with redundant telliness?

>a life of it's own//

Its/it's confusion.

>her future hanged in the balance//

"Hanged" is an execution method. You want "hung."

>As the hour wore on, Pinkie, quite without realizing it, gave in to her basest instinct and engaged Inkie and Skyline in conversation.//

Right around here, your perspective is wavering back and forth between several characters.

>this―" He gestured to the hexagram. "―is//

As before, you don't need to capitalize or use a period with the aside.

>Mother knew he had a dual personality, but it'd been so long since she'd seen this side of him that she'd wondered if he still had it.//

This is really coming out of nowhere.

>Meanwhile, Inkie and Skyline were taking advantage of their alone time.//

This is kind of a misplaced paragraph. It doesn't go with what's around it.

>lapse into grammatical correctness//

But… what she said wasn't grammatically correct.

>This was, in fact, for what she'd been waiting.//

The perspective is wavering a lot here.

>Pinkie laying next to her//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Inkie must have gotten up early and went in search of food.//

Verb agreement: must have went.

>Blinkie smiled. They made a cute couple, all the cuter for their insistence on denying their mutual interest. They weren't fooling anypony, least of all each other.//

This relationship is seeming rather forced. There's been no basis for it; they just conveniently liked each other. The pacing's getting realy slow about now, too. They're on this journey, and I have no sense that it should be a particularly long or arduous one, yet we're spending a lot of time on it, and nothing that interesting is happening. It's not moving the plot forward any.

>group, she'd caught a group//

Watch the close repetition.

>Black spots filled his vision.//

And yet another change of perspective.

>Inkie arrived on the scene and dropped the questionable edibles she'd collected.//

That's an entire paragraph that says nothing. So she's there. What does she do? If there's no function for her, then wait until there is one.

>a half-circle of bloody punctures marked where the wolf's fangs had been.//

There are only four fangs, two top and two bottom. They wouldn't form a semicircle.

>Ten minutes of tense, amateurish fumbling later, they managed, miraculously, to set the bone and stem the bleeding without making things considerably worse.//

That's rather bland. I can't see it passing that uneventfully, especially for Skyline.

>It hadn't attack//

Verb form.

>As they walked with their backs to the portal, only Granny was aware of the two tiny figures that scaled down from it on an improbable length of rope.//

How does this relate to what's going on? It comes out of nowhere. And I'm not sure how you classify a length of rope as "improbable."

>archeology//

archaeology

>It certainly felt that way, what with the sedative spell Granny had cast on him still wearing off.//

How does he know who Granny is? This is in his perspective. Indeed, just a little later, we get this:
>Somepony called Granny―his caretaker, presumably―had written it.//
So he doesn't know. Watch the perspective and what he could reasonably know or perceive.

>descendents//

descendants

>Pinkie, the only living pony to have left the rock farm//

I take it this was written pre-Maud?

>longer lived//

Hyphenate.

>swathe//

The noun definitions of this aren't quite what you want. Try "swath."

>Western Equestria, including such sights as Appleloosa, the Castle of the Two Sisters in the Everfree Forest, Ponyville, and through the mists of Cloudsdale, Galloping Gorge and the rock farm.//

And I'm guessing this isn't supposed to agree with the published map of Equestria?

>Luna seemed to be in a similar predicament. Her wings ruffled, and she didn't seem//

Watch the close repetition.

>In cognito//

incognito

>if she had to live on a mountainside, she wanted to liven the place up a bit//

So is this park in Canterlot? I'm confused. I thought Blinkie was underground with the rest of her family.

I have to be honest—I don't see the point of this aside scene with Luna. The only plot element it develops is Blinkie's guilt about killing the wolf, but it doesn't tread any new ground there.

>She hadn't wanted to cause a panic, so she'd instructed one guard to escort them to the botanical gardens and the other to wake her sister and have her keep an eye on them.//

Okay, but that was a long time to keep me waiting for an answer, and I can't fathom why you'd want to withhold that information. It's not like it's some big reveal.

>The bits and pieces she'd picked up from her staff had lead her to the bathhouse.//

>A butterfly with pastel blue-and-yellow wings lead her eyes//
>and lead her away//
>She lead him inside//
The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>bath? "//

Extraneous space.

>For awhile//

Another usage where "a while" needs to be two words.

First off, this was an interesting idea and a pretty well-written story. The two biggest issues for me were the amount of telly language and the sometimes constant shifts in perspective. That last one could be mitigated somewhat if you decided to keep it in an omniscient narration, but even then, giving a new viewpoint in every successive paragraph, as you do at times, is too much. On these two points, there are short discussions on "show versus tell" and "head hopping" at the top of this thread.

There are several scenes that seemed entirely extraneous, and the story really dragged during the journey underground, as I noted, because the pacing had slowed to a crawl, and it wasn't apparent that anything meaningful was happening.

Maybe this was done on purpose, but there didn't seem to be very distinct personalities for Blinkie and Inkie, aside from a single defining characteristic of each. After the story, I couldn't really describe either of them beyond that. Even Pinkie didn't often act like I'd expect her to from canon.

Finally, you have a tendency to work up to a moment through dialogue exchanges, but then once that moment finally arrives, present it after the fact as a narrative summary. It's a strange way of going about it, and it tends to disarm the scene's power.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;had ran//</span><br />had run<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;…&quot; he continued.//</span><br />That may cut it in video game dialogue, but not here. Describe what he&#039;s doing instead of giving me a blank.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he&#039;d never lain a hoof on her//</span><br />You need &quot;laid.&quot; there. &quot;Lain&quot; is intransitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It&#039;s about…&quot; Here Inkie made a sweeping gesture to encompass the living room, the farmhouse, and presumably, all that lay beyond. &quot;…this.&quot;//</span><br />This is the standard way to to a narrative aside in a quote:<br />It&#039;s about—&quot; here Inkie made a sweeping gesture to encompass the living room, the farmhouse, and presumably, all that lay beyond &quot;—this.&quot;<br />in the cae where she stops speaking for the action, or:<br />It&#039;s about&quot;—here Inkie made a sweeping gesture to encompass the living room, the farmhouse, and presumably, all that lay beyond—&quot;this.&quot;<br />if she doesn&#039;t.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A pained expression//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Inkie asked incredulously//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Looking bewildered//</span><br />You did alright in the early going, but here, I&#039;m hitting a number of spots where the emotional imformation is pretty telly at a time where it&#039;s pretty important to the plot. This pops up intermittently, so keep an eye out for it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Father tried to ignore them, but he could feel Blinkie&#039;s eyes on the back of his head.//</span><br />Why are you shifting over to his perspective here? This is information only he could know, but the whole things had been from Inkie&#039;s viewpoint so far.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For awhile//</span><br />In a usage like this, where a noun is required, you need &quot;a while&quot; to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn&#039;t look uncomfortable with her sister&#039;s affection, just embarrassed, as if someone had just told a rather personal story about her at some kind of get-together.//</span><br />You have a nice image there, so why preface it with redundant telliness?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a life of it&#039;s own//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her future hanged in the balance//</span><br />&quot;Hanged&quot; is an execution method. You want &quot;hung.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As the hour wore on, Pinkie, quite without realizing it, gave in to her basest instinct and engaged Inkie and Skyline in conversation.//</span><br />Right around here, your perspective is wavering back and forth between several characters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this―&quot; He gestured to the hexagram. &quot;―is//</span><br />As before, you don&#039;t need to capitalize or use a period with the aside.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mother knew he had a dual personality, but it&#039;d been so long since she&#039;d seen this side of him that she&#039;d wondered if he still had it.//</span><br />This is really coming out of nowhere.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Meanwhile, Inkie and Skyline were taking advantage of their alone time.//</span><br />This is kind of a misplaced paragraph. It doesn&#039;t go with what&#039;s around it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lapse into grammatical correctness//</span><br />But… what she said wasn&#039;t grammatically correct.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This was, in fact, for what she&#039;d been waiting.//</span><br />The perspective is wavering a lot here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie laying next to her//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Inkie must have gotten up early and went in search of food.//</span><br />Verb agreement: must have went.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Blinkie smiled. They made a cute couple, all the cuter for their insistence on denying their mutual interest. They weren&#039;t fooling anypony, least of all each other.//</span><br />This relationship is seeming rather forced. There&#039;s been no basis for it; they just conveniently liked each other. The pacing&#039;s getting realy slow about now, too. They&#039;re on this journey, and I have no sense that it should be a particularly long or arduous one, yet we&#039;re spending a lot of time on it, and nothing that interesting is happening. It&#039;s not moving the plot forward any.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;group, she&#039;d caught a group//</span><br />Watch the close repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Black spots filled his vision.//</span><br />And yet another change of perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Inkie arrived on the scene and dropped the questionable edibles she&#039;d collected.//</span><br />That&#039;s an entire paragraph that says nothing. So she&#039;s there. What does she do? If there&#039;s no function for her, then wait until there is one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a half-circle of bloody punctures marked where the wolf&#039;s fangs had been.//</span><br />There are only four fangs, two top and two bottom. They wouldn&#039;t form a semicircle.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ten minutes of tense, amateurish fumbling later, they managed, miraculously, to set the bone and stem the bleeding without making things considerably worse.//</span><br />That&#039;s rather bland. I can&#039;t see it passing that uneventfully, especially for Skyline.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It hadn&#039;t attack//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As they walked with their backs to the portal, only Granny was aware of the two tiny figures that scaled down from it on an improbable length of rope.//</span><br />How does this relate to what&#039;s going on? It comes out of nowhere. And I&#039;m not sure how you classify a length of rope as &quot;improbable.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;archeology//</span><br />archaeology<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It certainly felt that way, what with the sedative spell Granny had cast on him still wearing off.//</span><br />How does he know who Granny is? This is in his perspective. Indeed, just a little later, we get this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Somepony called Granny―his caretaker, presumably―had written it.//</span><br />So he doesn&#039;t know. Watch the perspective and what he could reasonably know or perceive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;descendents//</span><br />descendants<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie, the only living pony to have left the rock farm//</span><br />I take it this was written pre-Maud?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;longer lived//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;swathe//</span><br />The noun definitions of this aren&#039;t quite what you want. Try &quot;swath.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Western Equestria, including such sights as Appleloosa, the Castle of the Two Sisters in the Everfree Forest, Ponyville, and through the mists of Cloudsdale, Galloping Gorge and the rock farm.//</span><br />And I&#039;m guessing this isn&#039;t supposed to agree with the published map of Equestria?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna seemed to be in a similar predicament. Her wings ruffled, and she didn&#039;t seem//</span><br />Watch the close repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In cognito//</span><br />incognito<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if she had to live on a mountainside, she wanted to liven the place up a bit//</span><br />So is this park in Canterlot? I&#039;m confused. I thought Blinkie was underground with the rest of her family.<br /><br />I have to be honest—I don&#039;t see the point of this aside scene with Luna. The only plot element it develops is Blinkie&#039;s guilt about killing the wolf, but it doesn&#039;t tread any new ground there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She hadn&#039;t wanted to cause a panic, so she&#039;d instructed one guard to escort them to the botanical gardens and the other to wake her sister and have her keep an eye on them.//</span><br />Okay, but that was a long time to keep me waiting for an answer, and I can&#039;t fathom why you&#039;d want to withhold that information. It&#039;s not like it&#039;s some big reveal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The bits and pieces she&#039;d picked up from her staff had lead her to the bathhouse.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A butterfly with pastel blue-and-yellow wings lead her eyes//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and lead her away//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She lead him inside//</span><br />The past tense of &quot;lead&quot; is &quot;led.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bath? &quot;//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For awhile//</span><br />Another usage where &quot;a while&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br />First off, this was an interesting idea and a pretty well-written story. The two biggest issues for me were the amount of telly language and the sometimes constant shifts in perspective. That last one could be mitigated somewhat if you decided to keep it in an omniscient narration, but even then, giving a new viewpoint in every successive paragraph, as you do at times, is too much. On these two points, there are short discussions on &quot;show versus tell&quot; and &quot;head hopping&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br />There are several scenes that seemed entirely extraneous, and the story really dragged during the journey underground, as I noted, because the pacing had slowed to a crawl, and it wasn&#039;t apparent that anything meaningful was happening.<br /><br />Maybe this was done on purpose, but there didn&#039;t seem to be very distinct personalities for Blinkie and Inkie, aside from a single defining characteristic of each. After the story, I couldn&#039;t really describe either of them beyond that. Even Pinkie didn&#039;t often act like I&#039;d expect her to from canon.<br /><br />Finally, you have a tendency to work up to a moment through dialogue exchanges, but then once that moment finally arrives, present it after the fact as a narrative summary. It&#039;s a strange way of going about it, and it tends to disarm the scene&#039;s power.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 323

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>particularly as I was there attending a weather conference for said problems//

Keep your character voicing in mind. This really doesn't sound like a phrasing Dash would use.

Then in the second paragraph alone, you have seven "to be" verbs. These are inherently boring verbs. Nothing happens. At the beginning of the story is where you need to grab the reader's interest, and having a bunch of static verbs won't help. You need to be choosing more active verbs.

>I was far enough that they wouldn't notice me//

You pretty much already said this.

>with my lithe and athletic body//

An odd off-topic observation for her to make. Wouldn't she be focused on following the girls?

>lil'//

li'l. There's at least one instance of this in chapter 2 as well.

>Sweetie Belle chuckled weakly and I couldn't help but chuckle with her, stifling it with a hoof.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>“What are you doing here Rainbow Dash?!”//

Needs a comma for direct address. This is a recurring issue.

>eyes opening wide in shock//

>Confused//
>exasperated look//
These are just a few examples, but there is a lot of telly language in here. You get some leeway for a first-person narrator, especially when describing her own emotions, but you ought to focud on the evidence more than the conclusions. Don't tell me that Apple Bloom is exasperated; show me how she acts and appears such that I'll infer her exasperation. She's your actress. An actress doesn't just walk out on stage and name her emotions. She gets you to figure them out, which puts the audience in her perspective and gets them to identify with her. The biggest things to watch for are outright naming emotions (happy), adverb form (sadly), and prepositional phrase form (in excitement).

>the lie clear as the noonday sun//

>a clear sign of giving up//
You don't need to over-explain things. This was already evident from the description of her. Give your readers some room to figure these things out on their own.

>the meaning on my question//

of

>Regretfully//

This seems to speak to Dash's attitude about it more than Apple Bloom's.

>We had came//

Verb form.

>last minute//

Hyphenate.

>more-than-slightly//

You don't need those hyphens.

>She put her exhausted sewing supplies back into a small box and then put that into a pair of saddlebags//

She put one box into multiple saddlebags?

>thirty minute//

Hyphenate.

>The amount of upper-class ponies//

"Amount" is for collective quantities. You want "number."

>high class//

Hyphenate.

>Two night guards parted the gold curtains and Princess Luna stepped through, quietly sitting down in one of the two seats.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. Also note that participles imply concurrent action, so Luna sits down at the same time she steps through the curtains, while those two things would more reasonably happen in sequence.

>imposter//

impostor

>His horn lit up and I felt a tingle running through my body.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. And what exactly is he checking for? Does Dash know? If so, wouldn't she say? If not, wouldn't this surprise her?

>causing me to breath in relief.//

Breathe. And notice how often you've been using these participial phrases lately. This is the ninth sentence out of the last twenty that contains one. When you keep repeating more unusual structures like that it gets the writing in a rut.

>Her mouth formed a small “o” of shock, turning around to the guards.//

This explicitly says that her mouth turned around to the guards.

>She in turn gave it to me and I stared at the front cover.//

>Her horn lit up and I felt a fuzzy feeling go over me.//
Comma between the clauses.

>I huge grin//

Typo.

>Woah//

Why is it that so few authors can spell this right? Whoa.

>the lights in the room turned off completely, leaving all the light in the room on the stage//

This is repetitively phrased and somewhat contradictory.

>There is four acts//

Number agreement.

>The curtain's opened again//

Why is that apostrophe there?

>theme//

Given how much ignorance she has about ballet in general, I wonder how she knows this term. For that matter, Luna referred to a "ballad" earlier—are you sure you didn't mean ballet? I know my classical music, but I don't know much technical language about dance, and that may just be a term I haven't heard in this context before.

>it really was just that stunning//

This deserves to be expressed more. She's spending a lot of time here giving a factual description of Scootaloo's outfit, but what's her emotional response? That's what will capture the reader's interest. Invest the description of it with more of what Dash thinks about it and how she reacts to it.

>Did swans have tails?//

Someone so accustomed to flight wouldn't know this?

>pirouetting//

See earlier comments about how she'd know any technical lingo about ballet and how there's some word choice in here that seems too advanced for her anyway.

>bring a smile to her face//

Verb form.

>amazing as she was, started to falter a little. But anyone that noticed waved it away, too preoccupied with the amazing//

Watch the close repetition of words.

Let me say that this part of the story is doing a noticeably better job of getting at how Dash feels about the performance. She's making lots of statements grounded deeply in her perspective about what impresses and entertains her. Do a bit more like this when Scootaloo first comes out on stage, since that's when Dash would be most surprised. A lot of this description here, too, isn't naming the emotions directly, but implying them through Dash's reaction. It's easier to do so in this case, since it's internal to her, but basically you've hit the sweet spot in this section, so keep that up throughout.

>I was itching to be off//

A little repetitive with how she described herself just a few paragraphs ago.

>they would have fallen on their face//

faces

>blowing over the velvet rope//

Just used that verb in the last paragraph.

>hug slash tackle//

It's a modern oddity, so I don't know if there's a rule for this, but personally, I'd probably hyphenate this.

>laying in the hallway//

Lay/lie confusion.

>A smile reached her face and she turned to the rest of the watching ponies.//

>I complied and she sat up//
>Her voice startled me into action and I went over to her//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>She ruffled them, spreading her feathers and breathing a sigh of relief.//

The last seven narrative sentences in a row all have this <main clause>, <participial phrase> structure. One of them even has a second participial phrase. Mix it up a bit better. This is a structure that writers with moderate experience tend to abuse.

>my calm appearance starting to give way to the freak-out I was having inside.//

You've punctuated this like it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.

>Her face lit up and she stood a bit taller//

Comma between the clauses.

>But,” I paused and stared at her pointedly and waited till she met my gaze, “If//

Looks like you want to do a narrative aside. Here's how:
But—” I stared at her pointedly and waited till she met my gaze “—if
The pause is unnecessary, as it's already implied by the placement of the dashes (they go with the aside, outside the quotes, if there is no break in the speech).

>Quite a few ponies have wanted to come by and see the star, is that okay?//

Comma splice.

>Three, did you realize yet that your wings being underdeveloped is probably due to ballet?//

Wouldn't this be a common problem then? It might be tricky to fit this with what's come up on the subject in canon.

>much to my dad's displeasure//

This sounds rather formal and advanced for Scootaloo to say.

>Manehatten//

You spelled it Manehattan in chapter 1, didn't you?

>point,” she paused and flapped her wings a little, “I//

Use the way I showed you earlier to do an aside, and like that one, you won't need to narrate the pause.

>pausing//

You're using this verb a lot lately.

>followed by Apple Bloom and Sweetie. They followed//

Watch the repetition.

>I headed to the exit, opening it and flying out into the cool Manehattan air//

Synchronization again. This says she flies to the exit, opens it, and flies out, all at the same time.

>raising her hooves in happiness//

This is the first big lapse in being telly I've seen since early in the chapter.

This is a very cute story with just enough of a change (Dash's and Scootaloo's attitudes about each other and ballet) to create a story arc and some tension. There are some common topics discussed at the top of this thread. I'd encourage you to look at the ones under "show versus tell" and "comma use with conjunctions." Also make sure you go through and fix all the places where there need to be commas for direct address.

This may seem like a lot, but really, these aren't big things to fix. I doubt it'll take you long. The only things that'll take some thought are these:

As I described, make sure you don't lose sight of relating Dash's emotional state. Don't fall into the trap of listing only events and facts. Let her personalize it. And make sure to keep the character voicings consistent, particularly for Dash, since as the narrator, she gets a lot of speaking time. You need to make sure you don't have them use words, phrasings, or speaking mannerisms that don't fit their personalities or intelligence levels. This didn't happen a lot, so I pretty much pointed out each time it bugged me.

I hope to see this back so I can post it on the blog! When you're ready to resubmit, select the "back from Mars" option.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;particularly as I was there attending a weather conference for said problems//</span><br />Keep your character voicing in mind. This really doesn&#039;t sound like a phrasing Dash would use.<br /><br />Then in the second paragraph alone, you have seven &quot;to be&quot; verbs. These are inherently boring verbs. Nothing happens. At the beginning of the story is where you need to grab the reader&#039;s interest, and having a bunch of static verbs won&#039;t help. You need to be choosing more active verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was far enough that they wouldn&#039;t notice me//</span><br />You pretty much already said this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with my lithe and athletic body//</span><br />An odd off-topic observation for her to make. Wouldn&#039;t she be focused on following the girls?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lil&#039;//</span><br />li&#039;l. There&#039;s at least one instance of this in chapter 2 as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle chuckled weakly and I couldn&#039;t help but chuckle with her, stifling it with a hoof.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“What are you doing here Rainbow Dash?!”//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address. This is a recurring issue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyes opening wide in shock//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Confused//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;exasperated look//</span><br />These are just a few examples, but there is a lot of telly language in here. You get some leeway for a first-person narrator, especially when describing her own emotions, but you ought to focud on the evidence more than the conclusions. Don&#039;t tell me that Apple Bloom is exasperated; show me how she acts and appears such that I&#039;ll infer her exasperation. She&#039;s your actress. An actress doesn&#039;t just walk out on stage and name her emotions. She gets you to figure them out, which puts the audience in her perspective and gets them to identify with her. The biggest things to watch for are outright naming emotions (happy), adverb form (sadly), and prepositional phrase form (in excitement).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the lie clear as the noonday sun//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a clear sign of giving up//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to over-explain things. This was already evident from the description of her. Give your readers some room to figure these things out on their own.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the meaning on my question//</span><br />of<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Regretfully//</span><br />This seems to speak to Dash&#039;s attitude about it more than Apple Bloom&#039;s.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We had came//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;last minute//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;more-than-slightly//</span><br />You don&#039;t need those hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She put her exhausted sewing supplies back into a small box and then put that into a pair of saddlebags//</span><br />She put one box into multiple saddlebags?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thirty minute//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The amount of upper-class ponies//</span><br />&quot;Amount&quot; is for collective quantities. You want &quot;number.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;high class//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Two night guards parted the gold curtains and Princess Luna stepped through, quietly sitting down in one of the two seats.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses. Also note that participles imply concurrent action, so Luna sits down at the same time she steps through the curtains, while those two things would more reasonably happen in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;imposter//</span><br />impostor<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His horn lit up and I felt a tingle running through my body.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses. And what exactly is he checking for? Does Dash know? If so, wouldn&#039;t she say? If not, wouldn&#039;t this surprise her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;causing me to breath in relief.//</span><br />Breathe. And notice how often you&#039;ve been using these participial phrases lately. This is the ninth sentence out of the last twenty that contains one. When you keep repeating more unusual structures like that it gets the writing in a rut.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her mouth formed a small “o” of shock, turning around to the guards.//</span><br />This explicitly says that her mouth turned around to the guards.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She in turn gave it to me and I stared at the front cover.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her horn lit up and I felt a fuzzy feeling go over me.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I huge grin//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Woah//</span><br />Why is it that so few authors can spell this right? Whoa.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the lights in the room turned off completely, leaving all the light in the room on the stage//</span><br />This is repetitively phrased and somewhat contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There is four acts//</span><br />Number agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The curtain&#039;s opened again//</span><br />Why is that apostrophe there?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;theme//</span><br />Given how much ignorance she has about ballet in general, I wonder how she knows this term. For that matter, Luna referred to a &quot;ballad&quot; earlier—are you sure you didn&#039;t mean ballet? I know my classical music, but I don&#039;t know much technical language about dance, and that may just be a term I haven&#039;t heard in this context before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it really was just that stunning//</span><br />This deserves to be expressed more. She&#039;s spending a lot of time here giving a factual description of Scootaloo&#039;s outfit, but what&#039;s her emotional response? That&#039;s what will capture the reader&#039;s interest. Invest the description of it with more of what Dash thinks about it and how she reacts to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Did swans have tails?//</span><br />Someone so accustomed to flight wouldn&#039;t know this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pirouetting//</span><br />See earlier comments about how she&#039;d know any technical lingo about ballet and how there&#039;s some word choice in here that seems too advanced for her anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bring a smile to her face//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;amazing as she was, started to falter a little. But anyone that noticed waved it away, too preoccupied with the amazing//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of words.<br /><br />Let me say that this part of the story is doing a noticeably better job of getting at how Dash feels about the performance. She&#039;s making lots of statements grounded deeply in her perspective about what impresses and entertains her. Do a bit more like this when Scootaloo first comes out on stage, since that&#039;s when Dash would be most surprised. A lot of this description here, too, isn&#039;t naming the emotions directly, but implying them through Dash&#039;s reaction. It&#039;s easier to do so in this case, since it&#039;s internal to her, but basically you&#039;ve hit the sweet spot in this section, so keep that up throughout.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was itching to be off//</span><br />A little repetitive with how she described herself just a few paragraphs ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they would have fallen on their face//</span><br />faces<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blowing over the velvet rope//</span><br />Just used that verb in the last paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hug slash tackle//</span><br />It&#039;s a modern oddity, so I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a rule for this, but personally, I&#039;d probably hyphenate this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laying in the hallway//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A smile reached her face and she turned to the rest of the watching ponies.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I complied and she sat up//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her voice startled me into action and I went over to her//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She ruffled them, spreading her feathers and breathing a sigh of relief.//</span><br />The last seven narrative sentences in a row all have this &lt;main clause&gt;, &lt;participial phrase&gt; structure. One of them even has a second participial phrase. Mix it up a bit better. This is a structure that writers with moderate experience tend to abuse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my calm appearance starting to give way to the freak-out I was having inside.//</span><br />You&#039;ve punctuated this like it&#039;s a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her face lit up and she stood a bit taller//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But,” I paused and stared at her pointedly and waited till she met my gaze, “If//</span><br />Looks like you want to do a narrative aside. Here&#039;s how:<br />But—” I stared at her pointedly and waited till she met my gaze “—if<br />The pause is unnecessary, as it&#039;s already implied by the placement of the dashes (they go with the aside, outside the quotes, if there is no break in the speech).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Quite a few ponies have wanted to come by and see the star, is that okay?//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Three, did you realize yet that your wings being underdeveloped is probably due to ballet?//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t this be a common problem then? It might be tricky to fit this with what&#039;s come up on the subject in canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;much to my dad&#039;s displeasure//</span><br />This sounds rather formal and advanced for Scootaloo to say.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Manehatten//</span><br />You spelled it Manehattan in chapter 1, didn&#039;t you?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;point,” she paused and flapped her wings a little, “I//</span><br />Use the way I showed you earlier to do an aside, and like that one, you won&#039;t need to narrate the pause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pausing//</span><br />You&#039;re using this verb a lot lately.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;followed by Apple Bloom and Sweetie. They followed//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I headed to the exit, opening it and flying out into the cool Manehattan air//</span><br />Synchronization again. This says she flies to the exit, opens it, and flies out, all at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;raising her hooves in happiness//</span><br />This is the first big lapse in being telly I&#039;ve seen since early in the chapter.<br /><br />This is a very cute story with just enough of a change (Dash&#039;s and Scootaloo&#039;s attitudes about each other and ballet) to create a story arc and some tension. There are some common topics discussed at the top of this thread. I&#039;d encourage you to look at the ones under &quot;show versus tell&quot; and &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot; Also make sure you go through and fix all the places where there need to be commas for direct address.<br /><br />This may seem like a lot, but really, these aren&#039;t big things to fix. I doubt it&#039;ll take you long. The only things that&#039;ll take some thought are these:<br /><br />As I described, make sure you don&#039;t lose sight of relating Dash&#039;s emotional state. Don&#039;t fall into the trap of listing only events and facts. Let her personalize it. And make sure to keep the character voicings consistent, particularly for Dash, since as the narrator, she gets a lot of speaking time. You need to make sure you don&#039;t have them use words, phrasings, or speaking mannerisms that don&#039;t fit their personalities or intelligence levels. This didn&#039;t happen a lot, so I pretty much pointed out each time it bugged me.<br /><br />I hope to see this back so I can post it on the blog! When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, select the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Dec 30th, 2014 00:03</span></div><br/>

OroboroCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 324

>>131313
>>131354

Posting this here, since not sure where else to put it.

Went ahead and fixed most of the traditional issues you pointed out. At least one of them was just a flub where fimfic ate a line from google docs, but oh well.


>>unable to keep the annoyance from her tone//

>This is telly, but it's not even necessary. What she says and the choice of "muttered" already connotes annoyance.

While I ended up rewording this sentence a bit, the point isn't to show that Apple Bloom is annoyed. It's to show that Apple Bloom is consciously annoyed, trying to keep it from showing, and failing. There's a subtle difference. =P

As for the actual story stuff, I went ahead and added a few extra paragraphs at the end exploring Apple Bloom's thoughts on the matter.

Here's the link to the Gdoc version. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Szi3TuINheX02-f0sjddxDPs9cUu-uVVETALPfoRys/edit?usp=sharing

Thanks for the commentary again. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131313" onclick="return highlight('131313', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131313">&gt;&gt;131313</a><br /><a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131354" onclick="return highlight('131354', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131354">&gt;&gt;131354</a><br /><br />Posting this here, since not sure where else to put it. <br /><br />Went ahead and fixed most of the traditional issues you pointed out. At least one of them was just a flub where fimfic ate a line from google docs, but oh well.<br /><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&gt;unable to keep the annoyance from her tone//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This is telly, but it&#039;s not even necessary. What she says and the choice of &quot;muttered&quot; already connotes annoyance.</span><br /><br />While I ended up rewording this sentence a bit, the point isn&#039;t to show that Apple Bloom is annoyed. It&#039;s to show that Apple Bloom is consciously annoyed, trying to keep it from showing, and failing. There&#039;s a subtle difference. =P<br /><br />As for the actual story stuff, I went ahead and added a few extra paragraphs at the end exploring Apple Bloom&#039;s thoughts on the matter. <br /><br />Here&#039;s the link to the Gdoc version. <a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Szi3TuINheX02-f0sjddxDPs9cUu-uVVETALPfoRys/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Szi3TuINheX02-f0sjddxDPs9cUu-uVVETALPfoRys/edit?usp=sharing</a><br /><br />Thanks for the commentary again.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 325

>>131415
I'll have a look at this today. Check back for a reply.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131415" onclick="return highlight('131415', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131415">&gt;&gt;131415</a><br />I&#039;ll have a look at this today. Check back for a reply.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 326

>>131415
>‘em//
>‘cause//
>‘M’sorry//
Missed a couple of the backward apostrophes. And that last one is inconsistent with the way you spelled it without the first apostrophe later:
>M’sorry//

>It wasn’t like she resented her sister for enjoying herself with her friends, she was just feeling a little grumpy at the circumstances that had required her to trudge her way all the way into town from Sweet Apple Acres at a time when she would normally be in bed.//

That's still a comma splice.

Now you've got something that has AB acknowledge what AJ's problem is and even try to give her an easy time of it the next morning. That's good. It shows that she's concerned about it and wants to help. The last bit is that the way she says she'll do it, she'll have no way of knowing whether AJ will understand what she's doing. AJ's asleep, and so hasn't heard what AB says in the last line. And she's not likely to intuit why AB helps her out in the morning and attempts to cook like their mother. You've indicated now that AB does want to comfort her sister, so wouldn't she make sure to do it in a way that AJ realizes it? As long as she's going to the trouble to make that gesture, and because she genuinely feels bad that this causes AJ that much pain, wouldn't she plan to tell her that explicitly?<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131415" onclick="return highlight('131415', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131415">&gt;&gt;131415</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘cause//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘M’sorry//</span><br />Missed a couple of the backward apostrophes. And that last one is inconsistent with the way you spelled it without the first apostrophe later:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;M’sorry//</span><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It wasn’t like she resented her sister for enjoying herself with her friends, she was just feeling a little grumpy at the circumstances that had required her to trudge her way all the way into town from Sweet Apple Acres at a time when she would normally be in bed.//</span><br />That&#039;s still a comma splice.<br /><br />Now you&#039;ve got something that has AB acknowledge what AJ&#039;s problem is and even try to give her an easy time of it the next morning. That&#039;s good. It shows that she&#039;s concerned about it and wants to help. The last bit is that the way she says she&#039;ll do it, she&#039;ll have no way of knowing whether AJ will understand what she&#039;s doing. AJ&#039;s asleep, and so hasn&#039;t heard what AB says in the last line. And she&#039;s not likely to intuit why AB helps her out in the morning and attempts to cook like their mother. You&#039;ve indicated now that AB does want to comfort her sister, so wouldn&#039;t she make sure to do it in a way that AJ realizes it? As long as she&#039;s going to the trouble to make that gesture, and because she genuinely feels bad that this causes AJ that much pain, wouldn&#039;t she plan to tell her that explicitly?<br />

OroboroCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 327

>>131418

At this point, I think suggestions like that are a little bit beyond the scope of this fic. Apple Bloom recognizes that Applejack cares a lot about her and her happiness, and resolves to do something nice for her in return. I don't think it matters whether or not Applejack knows the explicit reasoning behind her sisters actions. Apple Bloom loves her sister, and Applejack will at least be able to see that much.

(The pie will probably be a disaster, but hey, she's just a kid.)

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131418" onclick="return highlight('131418', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131418">&gt;&gt;131418</a><br /><br />At this point, I think suggestions like that are a little bit beyond the scope of this fic. Apple Bloom recognizes that Applejack cares a lot about her and her happiness, and resolves to do something nice for her in return. I don&#039;t think it matters whether or not Applejack knows the explicit reasoning behind her sisters actions. Apple Bloom loves her sister, and Applejack will at least be able to see that much.<br /><br />(The pie will probably be a disaster, but hey, she&#039;s just a kid.)<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 328

>>131420
I'm getting more at Apple Bloom's state of mind. She realizes now that this is something that causes Applejack pain, and she's decided that she's going to make a gesture to address it. But she has to know that Applejack isn't going to remember what Apple Bloom does this night and is unlikely to read any significance into Apple Bloom's plans for the next day beyond a simple expression of affection.

So to put it simply, she knows what the problem is and how to address it, but she's not going to go about it in a way that will actually do anything to alleviate that pain? Isn't that rather cruel and insensitive of her? And all it'd take is some intent on her part to tell Applejack she's been a good mother or some such once she sobers up. That would bring a much stronger closure to the story's conflict, too.

I also still don't get much of a sense if this is something Apple Bloom's seen before, though the signs are leaning a little toward saying it is. In that case, maybe she instead reveals that she's tried directly addressing it before, but Applejack always relapses into worrying about it again. Or if not, then Apple Bloom would be surprised by the revelation.

Apple Bloom behaves rationally enough during the course of this specific evening; it's what it implies for her beyond these events that's unclear. And that's the difference between a series of scenes and a story. It sets up a conflict, but the one way it resolves it leaves Apple Bloom looking pretty heartless.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131420" onclick="return highlight('131420', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131420">&gt;&gt;131420</a><br />I&#039;m getting more at Apple Bloom&#039;s state of mind. She realizes now that this is something that causes Applejack pain, and she&#039;s decided that she&#039;s going to make a gesture to address it. But she has to know that Applejack isn&#039;t going to remember what Apple Bloom does this night and is unlikely to read any significance into Apple Bloom&#039;s plans for the next day beyond a simple expression of affection.<br /><br />So to put it simply, she knows what the problem is and how to address it, but she&#039;s not going to go about it in a way that will actually do anything to alleviate that pain? Isn&#039;t that rather cruel and insensitive of her? And all it&#039;d take is some intent on her part to tell Applejack she&#039;s been a good mother or some such once she sobers up. That would bring a much stronger closure to the story&#039;s conflict, too.<br /><br />I also still don&#039;t get much of a sense if this is something Apple Bloom&#039;s seen before, though the signs are leaning a little toward saying it is. In that case, maybe she instead reveals that she&#039;s tried directly addressing it before, but Applejack always relapses into worrying about it again. Or if not, then Apple Bloom would be surprised by the revelation.<br /><br />Apple Bloom behaves rationally enough during the course of this specific evening; it&#039;s what it implies for her beyond these events that&#039;s unclear. And that&#039;s the difference between a series of scenes and a story. It sets up a conflict, but the one way it resolves it leaves Apple Bloom looking pretty heartless.<br />

OroboroCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 329

>>131421

Hmm.

I've been putting this on the backburner for awhile now. I didn't quite agree with your interpretation of events, and wasn't quite sure how to approach the issue.

So stepping back and coming back later with a fresh mind is often a good approach. If not a quick one.

>Applejack would be a right wreck in the morning, so Apple Bloom figured she’d cancel her crusading plans to help her out a bit. Make her breakfast, and maybe ask her more about the story. Maybe she could even get her cutie mark that way! She didn’t know what her Mom’s apple pie had tasted like, but there was bound to be a family recipe book around somewhere, right?


Think that's enough to add what you think is missing?<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131421" onclick="return highlight('131421', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131421">&gt;&gt;131421</a><br /><br />Hmm. <br /><br />I&#039;ve been putting this on the backburner for awhile now. I didn&#039;t quite agree with your interpretation of events, and wasn&#039;t quite sure how to approach the issue. <br /><br />So stepping back and coming back later with a fresh mind is often a good approach. If not a quick one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack would be a right wreck in the morning, so Apple Bloom figured she’d cancel her crusading plans to help her out a bit. Make her breakfast, and maybe ask her more about the story. Maybe she could even get her cutie mark that way! She didn’t know what her Mom’s apple pie had tasted like, but there was bound to be a family recipe book around somewhere, right?</span><br /><br />Think that&#039;s enough to add what you think is missing?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 330

>>131469
Maybe I'm not understanding what's upsetting Applejack. If it's just that she misses her mother, then there's not a lot here to distinguish it from a whole lot of other stories. If it's that Applejack feels like she hasn't lived up to their mother's example in raising Apple Bloom, then there's something more original here, and that's what I assumed.

So working from that, Applejack's said as much to Apple Bloom. So Apple Bloom would want to do something to reassure Applejack that she has done a good job, right? So far, so good.

What does Apple Bloom do to reassure her, though? First she speaks that final line. Applejack's already fallen asleep, so Apple Bloom must know she didn't hear it. Even if she did, she's unlikely to remember it in the morning, so there will be no lasting effect of her words, and Apple Bloom should know that.

You'd also added a bit where Apple Bloom wants to cook her mother's apple pie recipe the next day. It must be something they do from time to time anyway, so what's to distinguish this one? It's one thing to say that Applejack might take some comfort in enjoying something of their mother's, but it's quite another to say she'll make the leap of figuring out Apple Bloom did it as a way of reassuring her that she's been a good mother. Again, there will be no lasting effect from this, and Apple Bloom should know that.

Wouldn't Apple Bloom do something in a way that Applejack is sure to understand, and while Applejack is in a state of mind where she'll remember it? It's a subtle difference, but a powerful one. It's the difference between her resolving to serve Applejack a slice of pie with a smile, and her resolving to serve Applejack a slice of pie with a hug and a message of thanks for being the mother that she needed.

Restricting her acknowledgment to ways that Applejack is likely to forget or miss the significance of seems irresponsible, and deliberately so.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131469" onclick="return highlight('131469', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131469">&gt;&gt;131469</a><br />Maybe I&#039;m not understanding what&#039;s upsetting Applejack. If it&#039;s just that she misses her mother, then there&#039;s not a lot here to distinguish it from a whole lot of other stories. If it&#039;s that Applejack feels like she hasn&#039;t lived up to their mother&#039;s example in raising Apple Bloom, then there&#039;s something more original here, and that&#039;s what I assumed.<br /><br />So working from that, Applejack&#039;s said as much to Apple Bloom. So Apple Bloom would want to do something to reassure Applejack that she <i>has</i> done a good job, right? So far, so good.<br /><br />What does Apple Bloom do to reassure her, though? First she speaks that final line. Applejack&#039;s already fallen asleep, so Apple Bloom must know she didn&#039;t hear it. Even if she did, she&#039;s unlikely to remember it in the morning, so there will be no lasting effect of her words, and Apple Bloom should know that.<br /><br />You&#039;d also added a bit where Apple Bloom wants to cook her mother&#039;s apple pie recipe the next day. It must be something they do from time to time anyway, so what&#039;s to distinguish this one? It&#039;s one thing to say that Applejack might take some comfort in enjoying something of their mother&#039;s, but it&#039;s quite another to say she&#039;ll make the leap of figuring out Apple Bloom did it as a way of reassuring her that she&#039;s been a good mother. Again, there will be no lasting effect from this, and Apple Bloom should know that.<br /><br />Wouldn&#039;t Apple Bloom do something in a way that Applejack is sure to understand, and while Applejack is in a state of mind where she&#039;ll remember it? It&#039;s a subtle difference, but a powerful one. It&#039;s the difference between her resolving to serve Applejack a slice of pie with a smile, and her resolving to serve Applejack a slice of pie with a hug and a message of thanks for being the mother that she needed.<br /><br />Restricting her acknowledgment to ways that Applejack is likely to forget or miss the significance of seems irresponsible, and deliberately so.<br />

OroboroCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 331

>>131472

>Make her breakfast, and maybe ask her more about the story.


Was the important addition to the bit I quoted, saying she'll ask Applejack more about the story in the morning.

In a more general sense…

Applejack is drunk. She's in a state where suddenly something that would normally pretty irrelevant and silly feels like the most important goddamn thing in the world right now, and it's a matter of life or death that she convey this feeling to others right away.

In this case, it was a silly bedtime story her mother had told her to make her feel better. It was some thing where hearing it made her feel safe and happy. In her drunken state, she wants to be able to convey these same feelings towards Apple Bloom.

Applejack fails horribly in communicating her message, (And Apple Bloom isn't really listening besides), and she gets frustrated.

By the time she throws up, her lucidity is all but gone, leaving behind only the frustration and the general anxieties and worries that what she does will never be as good as if her mom had been the one doing it. Compounded at her seeming failure at telling a simple story.

Anyway, that's where Applejack is coming from with this.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131472" onclick="return highlight('131472', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131472">&gt;&gt;131472</a><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Make her breakfast, and maybe ask her more about the story. </span><br /><br />Was the important addition to the bit I quoted, saying she&#039;ll ask Applejack more about the story in the morning.<br /><br />In a more general sense…<br /><br />Applejack is drunk. She&#039;s in a state where suddenly something that would normally pretty irrelevant and silly feels like the most important goddamn thing in the world right now, and it&#039;s a matter of life or death that she convey this feeling to others right away. <br /><br />In this case, it was a silly bedtime story her mother had told her to make her feel better. It was some thing where hearing it made her feel safe and happy. In her drunken state, she wants to be able to convey these same feelings towards Apple Bloom.<br /><br />Applejack fails horribly in communicating her message, (And Apple Bloom isn&#039;t really listening besides), and she gets frustrated. <br /><br />By the time she throws up, her lucidity is all but gone, leaving behind only the frustration and the general anxieties and worries that what she does will never be as good as if her mom had been the one doing it. Compounded at her seeming failure at telling a simple story.<br /><br />Anyway, that&#039;s where Applejack is coming from with this.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 332

>>131474
So Applejack's not actually broken up about any of this? It was just the rambling of a sentimental drunk? If so, that'd be disappointing. That's what was giving the story some conflict. Apple Bloom doesn't wave it off as inconsequential, even in your original version. Absent some form of conflict, it's just a vignette where Apple Bloom walks her drunk sister home. What point does it make then? What have I learned about the characters, what's different about my perception of them as a result of reading this? A story should be about change, or else it's just a scene that doesn't lead anywhere. What's my takeaway? I come into the story with knowledge of canon Equestria. What do you want me to know about that world or its characters that's different after I read it?<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131474" onclick="return highlight('131474', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131474">&gt;&gt;131474</a><br />So Applejack&#039;s not actually broken up about any of this? It was just the rambling of a sentimental drunk? If so, that&#039;d be disappointing. That&#039;s what was giving the story some conflict. Apple Bloom doesn&#039;t wave it off as inconsequential, even in your original version. Absent some form of conflict, it&#039;s just a vignette where Apple Bloom walks her drunk sister home. What point does it make then? What have I learned about the characters, what&#039;s different about my perception of them as a result of reading this? A story should be about change, or else it&#039;s just a scene that doesn&#039;t lead anywhere. What&#039;s my takeaway? I come into the story with knowledge of canon Equestria. What do you want me to know about that world or its characters that&#039;s different after I read it?<br />

OroboroCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 333

>>131481
Going into this, there are two major themes I was working with.

One, as already mentioned, is to capture the general frustration of being a child and having to deal with drunk adults.

The second (Which is a theme I work with often in other stories, but) is about communicating a message through the medium of storytelling. The message in this case is a simple "I love you and will always be watching out for you."

Like a drunken game of telephone, the end result doesn't come through correctly. It takes Applejack letting the source of message slip for it to finally click with Apple Bloom, so she resolves to return that message in her own way.

We also learn that AppleMom was probably a bit of a troll. <a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131481" onclick="return highlight('131481', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131481">&gt;&gt;131481</a><br />Going into this, there are two major themes I was working with.<br /><br />One, as already mentioned, is to capture the general frustration of being a child and having to deal with drunk adults. <br /><br />The second (Which is a theme I work with often in other stories, but) is about communicating a message through the medium of storytelling. The message in this case is a simple &quot;I love you and will always be watching out for you.&quot; <br /><br />Like a drunken game of telephone, the end result doesn&#039;t come through correctly. It takes Applejack letting the source of message slip for it to finally click with Apple Bloom, so she resolves to return that message in her own way. <br /><br />We also learn that AppleMom was probably a bit of a troll.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 334

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Also note that there's a link to the Editor's Omnibus at the end of the first post. It has a lot of reference material as well as links to reviewing groups who can help you with your story, if you need further assistance.

I see you're relatively new at this, and one of the other pre-readers took a liking to the story's concept, so I figured I'd give you some detailed feedback. You never know who might be among the next batch of good writers, so I might as well help a few to hit the ground running.

Synopsis:
>On the wedding day of Spike and Sweetie Belle they go through the memories that brought them to this day. Will their most precious memories help them with the wedding day jitters?//
For the most part, you want to avoid using the same word or phrase in a close space, unless the repetition is done intentionally and to create an effect. In that case, it needs to be obvious that the repetition is deliberate. Here, you've used "memories" in both sentences without any apparent effect to doing so. Also note that it's pretty cliched to ask an unanswered rhetorical question in the synopsis, especially as the last sentence. It's also a somewhat clunky structure to use an indirect possession like this. As compared to "the wedding day of Spike and Sweetie Belle," "Spike and Sweetie Belle's wedding day" is a little more concise and direct, and it also has a more active feel to it.

Story:
>Spike//
You don't need to identify the focus character of each scene like this. The reader will soon get the feel that you're switching back and forth. If you've created distinctive enough voices for each character, you won't have to do this anyway, since the reader will pick it up by feel. That said, I think it probably wasn't the right choice to go with a first-person narrator if you're going to be switching viewpoints. Third-person limited, where the narrator stays with one character at a time and can speak that character's thoughts and impression for her, gives you much the sme flexibility and personal voice, yet is much easier to switch viewpoints.

>Alright stallions!//

Whenever one character addresses another by name, title, or reference, set it off with a comma. Or commas on both sides, if it's in the middle of the sentence. So you need a comma here. Keep an eye for this throughout. I'm not going to mark any more.

>*CRASH*//

It's considered improper to use sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

>Rarity sighed as she ran past me to take care of the bride’s dress.//

Contrast that with this:
>The pony most worried would probably be my ex-crush Rarity.//
This gets at a concept you'll hear a lot in writing: show versus tell. Your characters are actors in a movie playing in my head. The narration is a voice-over. Now, does an actor come out with a straight face and announce that he's sad? No, he gets his audience to figure out he's sad by how he looks, how he acts, and what he says in conversation. Similarly, imply his emotions to the reader through similar things, like facial expression and body language. There's a brief discussion of this in the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread. In the first sentence, you do a good job of giving me only the raw evidence, the things a witness could cite as fact. But behind those words, the sigh implies some dissatisfaction or stress, and the running makes it clear she's in a hurry. You've said all that without saying it. In the second, you just tell me Rarity is worried. I know it as a fact now, but it's less real to me since I'm taking the narrator's word for it instead of figuring it out myself. By the way, you'd need to set that "Rarity" off with a comma. It's a structure called an appositive, which is where you've already named something or someone (ex-crush) and are naming it again in a different way or as an explanation (Rarity).

>I can’t… Breath!//

You want the verb form, "breathe." And you don't need to capitalize it, since it makes grammatical sense as a continuation of the suspended sentence. It doesn't necessitate beginning a new one.

Now, these scenes could stand to be considerably longer. It's jarring to whip back and for the between them so quickly. There are probably a few places where you could combine several of them into one, but it does look like a lot of them have time or setting skips that do warrant being separate scenes. They're just not long enough for the reader to get settled in them, though. Let me see some more detail about the room they're in, the objects that see, what little actions they take. These are the types of details that really add life to a scene.

>What do I tell you?” She said as she let the corset go slack.//

There's a section up top about capitalization and punctuation of dialogue. It looks like you're consistently missing how to do that.

>Rarity said as she cracked open the make-up case.//

See, there's not much beyond the dialogue in a lot of these scenes. Don't throw in details just for the sake of it, but it's not hard to make things relevant. For instance, say Sweetie Belle describes the carved wooden frame of the mirror she's facing. If you mention that out of the blue, it's pointless. But if you have her concentrating on it to distract herself from the corset that feels like it's about to make her pop, then you've made a reason for it to be relevant.

>I grumbled as I extended a claw to pull on my collar.//

The last four sentences in a row have an "as" clause. When you fall into structural repetition like that (simple and compound sentences generally get excused, mostly, because they're so common), it makes the story seem like reading a list.

>Twilight expressed//

You're using a lot of unusual speaking verbs. There's a section up top on saidisms which puts forth the rationale behind minimizing this.

>I smiled as I waved to her.//

These are short scenes, and yet you've used nine "as" clauses in this one alone.

>handy work//

handiwork

>As I turned my head to see who Rarity was talking to//

This is a dependent clause. You'll usually set these off with a comma. Why is there a blank line after this? Look how nearly every one of your paragraphs is a single line. That tells me that you're skimping on how much the characters would actually say, what actions they take, and what descriptions the narrator gives.

>I had never seen Scoots so happy in my life.//

Again, an example or illustrative anecdote would be far more powerful than simply having the narrator inform me she was happy.

>Ever since she started dating Diamond Tiara//

You have to be careful when introducing elements like this that obviously have quite a story behind them when you have no intention of actually telling that story. They're cheap teases.

>surprising everyone//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>Thanks mister//

The ring bearer is someone who doesn't even know Spike well enough to call him by name?

>his Bride-to-be//

Why is that capitalized? And whom does "his" refer to? Are you sure you didn't mean "my"?

>averted her eyes away from him//

This is redundant. That's what averting means.

>blushing//

There are four instances of blushing in this scene.

>to much//

too

There's really no need to render the entire scene in italics. They're used to make a subset of things stand out, not something in its entirety. If you write it well, the reader will quickly pick up that it's a flashback from clues about the characters or events.

>She was nervous.//

>He was nervous.//
These appear only one paragraph apart.

>As Spike ran around grabbing things that Rarity asked for, he realized exactly what he was doing.//

See how vague that is? What does Rarity ask him to do? How does he go about doing it? How does he feel as this all happens? There's so much that gets glossed over.

>Twilights//

Missing apostrophe.

>Sweeties fore hooves//

Sweetie's forehooves

>Twilight flew down towards Sweetie Belle scaring her greatly.//

Here's a presentation problem. This isn't done as a flashback in a very general sense. It's one specifically cued by Spike thinking back on the event. But these are things he couldn't know. He wasn't there. He wouldn't know what happened at these other places or how Sweetie Belle felt about it. He can't speak to things he doesn't know. Either you'd have to limit yourself to what he witnessed and summarize what he learned about what he didn't witness, or you'd need to make this a more general type of flashback that's not tied to his perspective.

>The unicorn//

More and more lately, you've been referring to characters in this manner. There's a section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome that explains why it's usually a bad idea.

>said through breathes//

I assume you meant "breaths," but that's awkwardly phrased and very vague.

>When yall get back//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma, and it's "y'all."

>I’m he-//

There's a section up top on proper dash usage.

>I’m the one that the letter is for//

That sounds very formal and forced, which is the wrong mood for the situation.

>4//

Write out numbers that small.

>I love you with all my heart, you changed my life just by being in it.//

That's a comma splice.

>At this point//

This kind of phrasing, in which the narration refers to itself, is a bad idea in anything but a very subjective narrator.

>But she gave him all the answer he need.//

Typo.

>“I hope you lik-.“//

You don't use a period with a dash, and notice how it can make the smart quotes go in the wrong direction. You may have to paste in closing quotes from somewhere else.

>They heard a loud cheer coming from the clouds.//

Why would they all be watching? That's pretty creepy.

>As I smiled at this memory//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause, but the flashbacks were introduced as Spike's reminiscence. This is really muddying the waters of perspective.

>moment is what caused the moment//

Watch the repetition.

>Do you Sweetie Belle, take Spike the Dragon to be your lawfully wedded husband, to have and to hold, in rich and poor, in sickness and in health, for as long as you both shall live.//

Missing a comma before "Sweetie Belle," and it's a question, isn't it?

>The love they shared would last centuries//

Will it? Maybe in Spike's memory, but she won't live that long, unless you're doing something to change that.

You also need to give some thought as to what you want this story to say. So far, it's just that everything worked out, from start to finish. There are no obstacles to overcome, no conflict to resolve. Stories are about change. I call it my "before and after" test. If I look at the world, either as a whole or focused on a single character, at the beginning and ending states of the story, what has changed as a result of the story's events? Is there a shift in how the world works? Has a character come to an important realization? Do I learn something new about a character that makes me see her in a new light?

There are lots of ways you can incorporate change into a story. The closest thing you have is Spike's evolution of feelings toward Sweetie Belle, from friend to romantic interest. Yet you don't spend very long on that one moment. You spend far longer on the setup for his proposal, which is the payoff, but it's not (or shouldn't be) the story's emotional high point, because it's pretty formulaic, and the outcome isn't in doubt.

Beyond that, just note the things I had to emphasize or point out multiple times. I need a richer sense of what's going on besides just the dialogue and occasional speaking action (there is a section up top about talking heads which explains some more). I need some more descriptive scene setting. I need the events linked to characters' emotional responses, and I need thos emotions to come through by implication, not overt declaration. I also recommend you rethink how the story is structured and the perspectives used.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Also note that there&#039;s a link to the Editor&#039;s Omnibus at the end of the first post. It has a lot of reference material as well as links to reviewing groups who can help you with your story, if you need further assistance.<br /><br />I see you&#039;re relatively new at this, and one of the other pre-readers took a liking to the story&#039;s concept, so I figured I&#039;d give you some detailed feedback. You never know who might be among the next batch of good writers, so I might as well help a few to hit the ground running.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On the wedding day of Spike and Sweetie Belle they go through the memories that brought them to this day. Will their most precious memories help them with the wedding day jitters?//</span><br />For the most part, you want to avoid using the same word or phrase in a close space, unless the repetition is done intentionally and to create an effect. In that case, it needs to be obvious that the repetition is deliberate. Here, you&#039;ve used &quot;memories&quot; in both sentences without any apparent effect to doing so. Also note that it&#039;s pretty cliched to ask an unanswered rhetorical question in the synopsis, especially as the last sentence. It&#039;s also a somewhat clunky structure to use an indirect possession like this. As compared to &quot;the wedding day of Spike and Sweetie Belle,&quot; &quot;Spike and Sweetie Belle&#039;s wedding day&quot; is a little more concise and direct, and it also has a more active feel to it.<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to identify the focus character of each scene like this. The reader will soon get the feel that you&#039;re switching back and forth. If you&#039;ve created distinctive enough voices for each character, you won&#039;t have to do this anyway, since the reader will pick it up by feel. That said, I think it probably wasn&#039;t the right choice to go with a first-person narrator if you&#039;re going to be switching viewpoints. Third-person limited, where the narrator stays with one character at a time and can speak that character&#039;s thoughts and impression for her, gives you much the sme flexibility and personal voice, yet is much easier to switch viewpoints.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Alright stallions!//</span><br />Whenever one character addresses another by name, title, or reference, set it off with a comma. Or commas on both sides, if it&#039;s in the middle of the sentence. So you need a comma here. Keep an eye for this throughout. I&#039;m not going to mark any more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;*CRASH*//</span><br />It&#039;s considered improper to use sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity sighed as she ran past me to take care of the bride’s dress.//</span><br />Contrast that with this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The pony most worried would probably be my ex-crush Rarity.//</span><br />This gets at a concept you&#039;ll hear a lot in writing: show versus tell. Your characters are actors in a movie playing in my head. The narration is a voice-over. Now, does an actor come out with a straight face and announce that he&#039;s sad? No, he gets his audience to figure out he&#039;s sad by how he looks, how he acts, and what he says in conversation. Similarly, imply his emotions to the reader through similar things, like facial expression and body language. There&#039;s a brief discussion of this in the &quot;show versus tell&quot; section at the top of this thread. In the first sentence, you do a good job of giving me only the raw evidence, the things a witness could cite as fact. But behind those words, the sigh implies some dissatisfaction or stress, and the running makes it clear she&#039;s in a hurry. You&#039;ve said all that without saying it. In the second, you just tell me Rarity is worried. I know it as a fact now, but it&#039;s less real to me since I&#039;m taking the narrator&#039;s word for it instead of figuring it out myself. By the way, you&#039;d need to set that &quot;Rarity&quot; off with a comma. It&#039;s a structure called an appositive, which is where you&#039;ve already named something or someone (ex-crush) and are naming it again in a different way or as an explanation (Rarity).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can’t… Breath!//</span><br />You want the verb form, &quot;breathe.&quot; And you don&#039;t need to capitalize it, since it makes grammatical sense as a continuation of the suspended sentence. It doesn&#039;t necessitate beginning a new one.<br /><br />Now, these scenes could stand to be considerably longer. It&#039;s jarring to whip back and for the between them so quickly. There are probably a few places where you could combine several of them into one, but it does look like a lot of them have time or setting skips that do warrant being separate scenes. They&#039;re just not long enough for the reader to get settled in them, though. Let me see some more detail about the room they&#039;re in, the objects that see, what little actions they take. These are the types of details that really add life to a scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What do I tell you?” She said as she let the corset go slack.//</span><br />There&#039;s a section up top about capitalization and punctuation of dialogue. It looks like you&#039;re consistently missing how to do that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity said as she cracked open the make-up case.//</span><br />See, there&#039;s not much beyond the dialogue in a lot of these scenes. Don&#039;t throw in details just for the sake of it, but it&#039;s not hard to make things relevant. For instance, say Sweetie Belle describes the carved wooden frame of the mirror she&#039;s facing. If you mention that out of the blue, it&#039;s pointless. But if you have her concentrating on it to distract herself from the corset that feels like it&#039;s about to make her pop, then you&#039;ve made a reason for it to be relevant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I grumbled as I extended a claw to pull on my collar.//</span><br />The last four sentences in a row have an &quot;as&quot; clause. When you fall into structural repetition like that (simple and compound sentences generally get excused, mostly, because they&#039;re so common), it makes the story seem like reading a list.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight expressed//</span><br />You&#039;re using a lot of unusual speaking verbs. There&#039;s a section up top on saidisms which puts forth the rationale behind minimizing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I smiled as I waved to her.//</span><br />These are short scenes, and yet you&#039;ve used nine &quot;as&quot; clauses in this one alone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;handy work//</span><br />handiwork<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As I turned my head to see who Rarity was talking to//</span><br />This is a dependent clause. You&#039;ll usually set these off with a comma. Why is there a blank line after this? Look how nearly every one of your paragraphs is a single line. That tells me that you&#039;re skimping on how much the characters would actually say, what actions they take, and what descriptions the narrator gives.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I had never seen Scoots so happy in my life.//</span><br />Again, an example or illustrative anecdote would be far more powerful than simply having the narrator inform me she was happy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ever since she started dating Diamond Tiara//</span><br />You have to be careful when introducing elements like this that obviously have quite a story behind them when you have no intention of actually telling that story. They&#039;re cheap teases.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;surprising everyone//</span><br />Set off participial phrases with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thanks mister//</span><br />The ring bearer is someone who doesn&#039;t even know Spike well enough to call him by name?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his Bride-to-be//</span><br />Why is that capitalized? And whom does &quot;his&quot; refer to? Are you sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;my&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;averted her eyes away from him//</span><br />This is redundant. That&#039;s what averting means.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blushing//</span><br />There are four instances of blushing in this scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to much//</span><br />too<br /><br />There&#039;s really no need to render the entire scene in italics. They&#039;re used to make a subset of things stand out, not something in its entirety. If you write it well, the reader will quickly pick up that it&#039;s a flashback from clues about the characters or events.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was nervous.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was nervous.//</span><br />These appear only one paragraph apart.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As Spike ran around grabbing things that Rarity asked for, he realized exactly what he was doing.//</span><br />See how vague that is? What does Rarity ask him to do? How does he go about doing it? How does he feel as this all happens? There&#039;s so much that gets glossed over.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilights//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweeties fore hooves//</span><br />Sweetie&#039;s forehooves<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight flew down towards Sweetie Belle scaring her greatly.//</span><br />Here&#039;s a presentation problem. This isn&#039;t done as a flashback in a very general sense. It&#039;s one specifically cued by Spike thinking back on the event. But these are things he couldn&#039;t know. He wasn&#039;t there. He wouldn&#039;t know what happened at these other places or how Sweetie Belle felt about it. He can&#039;t speak to things he doesn&#039;t know. Either you&#039;d have to limit yourself to what he witnessed and summarize what he learned about what he didn&#039;t witness, or you&#039;d need to make this a more general type of flashback that&#039;s not tied to his perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The unicorn//</span><br />More and more lately, you&#039;ve been referring to characters in this manner. There&#039;s a section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome that explains why it&#039;s usually a bad idea.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said through breathes//</span><br />I assume you meant &quot;breaths,&quot; but that&#039;s awkwardly phrased and very vague.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When yall get back//</span><br />Set off the dependent clause with a comma, and it&#039;s &quot;y&#039;all.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m he-//</span><br />There&#039;s a section up top on proper dash usage.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m the one that the letter is for//</span><br />That sounds very formal and forced, which is the wrong mood for the situation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;4//</span><br />Write out numbers that small.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I love you with all my heart, you changed my life just by being in it.//</span><br />That&#039;s a comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At this point//</span><br />This kind of phrasing, in which the narration refers to itself, is a bad idea in anything but a very subjective narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But she gave him all the answer he need.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I hope you lik-.“//</span><br />You don&#039;t use a period with a dash, and notice how it can make the smart quotes go in the wrong direction. You may have to paste in closing quotes from somewhere else.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They heard a loud cheer coming from the clouds.//</span><br />Why would they all be watching? That&#039;s pretty creepy.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As I smiled at this memory//</span><br />Needs a comma for the dependent clause, but the flashbacks were introduced as Spike&#039;s reminiscence. This is really muddying the waters of perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;moment is what caused the moment//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do you Sweetie Belle, take Spike the Dragon to be your lawfully wedded husband, to have and to hold, in rich and poor, in sickness and in health, for as long as you both shall live.//</span><br />Missing a comma before &quot;Sweetie Belle,&quot; and it&#039;s a question, isn&#039;t it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The love they shared would last centuries//</span><br />Will it? Maybe in Spike&#039;s memory, but she won&#039;t live that long, unless you&#039;re doing something to change that.<br /><br />You also need to give some thought as to what you want this story to say. So far, it&#039;s just that everything worked out, from start to finish. There are no obstacles to overcome, no conflict to resolve. Stories are about change. I call it my &quot;before and after&quot; test. If I look at the world, either as a whole or focused on a single character, at the beginning and ending states of the story, what has changed as a result of the story&#039;s events? Is there a shift in how the world works? Has a character come to an important realization? Do I learn something new about a character that makes me see her in a new light?<br /><br />There are lots of ways you can incorporate change into a story. The closest thing you have is Spike&#039;s evolution of feelings toward Sweetie Belle, from friend to romantic interest. Yet you don&#039;t spend very long on that one moment. You spend far longer on the setup for his proposal, which is the payoff, but it&#039;s not (or shouldn&#039;t be) the story&#039;s emotional high point, because it&#039;s pretty formulaic, and the outcome isn&#039;t in doubt.<br /><br />Beyond that, just note the things I had to emphasize or point out multiple times. I need a richer sense of what&#039;s going on besides just the dialogue and occasional speaking action (there is a section up top about talking heads which explains some more). I need some more descriptive scene setting. I need the events linked to characters&#039; emotional responses, and I need thos emotions to come through by implication, not overt declaration. I also recommend you rethink how the story is structured and the perspectives used.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 335

>>131482
At this point, it feels like we're talking in circles. I want there to be some conflict resolution or impetus for change, and you don't seem to want to make it into that.

Every major character (and often the minor ones as well) should want something. Bonus points if they want multiple things, especially if they're mutually exclusive. The story is how those characters try to get what they want, what obstacles they face, what they're willing to do to achieve it, and how the process changes them.

Both of these things you've mentioned aren't conflicts. They're just moods, and rather static ones at that. Showing how a child has to deal with a drunk adult is, on it's face, a "snapshot in the life" thing with no point. Apple Bloom's dealt with it before, and she'll deal with it again. Nothing has changed, not what will happen in the future, not how she feels about it now, and not in my understanding of her character. Applejack making sure Apple Bloom knows she'll be taken care of isn't a conflict. Apple Bloom already knows this, and the mere admission doesn't change their relationship or my perception of them. Apple Bloom already knew that, and her view on it hasn't altered.

If all you want to do is show Apple Bloom ushering Applejack home and Applejack expressing some affection for her sister, that's fine. It's cute even. But it's not a story.

Either way, I need to come to a resolution on this soon. I've been keeping it in a holding pattern in the queue for weeks now, and it's starting to get in the way. If the story is already what you want it to be, then by all means keep it that way, but in that case, it should probably just stay on FiMFiction.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131482" onclick="return highlight('131482', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131482">&gt;&gt;131482</a><br />At this point, it feels like we&#039;re talking in circles. I want there to be some conflict resolution or impetus for change, and you don&#039;t seem to want to make it into that.<br /><br />Every major character (and often the minor ones as well) should want something. Bonus points if they want multiple things, especially if they&#039;re mutually exclusive. The story is how those characters try to get what they want, what obstacles they face, what they&#039;re willing to do to achieve it, and how the process changes them.<br /><br />Both of these things you&#039;ve mentioned aren&#039;t conflicts. They&#039;re just moods, and rather static ones at that. Showing how a child has to deal with a drunk adult is, on it&#039;s face, a &quot;snapshot in the life&quot; thing with no point. Apple Bloom&#039;s dealt with it before, and she&#039;ll deal with it again. Nothing has changed, not what will happen in the future, not how she feels about it now, and not in my understanding of her character. Applejack making sure Apple Bloom knows she&#039;ll be taken care of isn&#039;t a conflict. Apple Bloom already knows this, and the mere admission doesn&#039;t change their relationship or my perception of them. Apple Bloom already knew that, and her view on it hasn&#039;t altered.<br /><br />If all you want to do is show Apple Bloom ushering Applejack home and Applejack expressing some affection for her sister, that&#039;s fine. It&#039;s cute even. But it&#039;s not a story.<br /><br />Either way, I need to come to a resolution on this soon. I&#039;ve been keeping it in a holding pattern in the queue for weeks now, and it&#039;s starting to get in the way. If the story is already what you want it to be, then by all means keep it that way, but in that case, it should probably just stay on FiMFiction.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 336

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>rumors of a strange phenomenon dubbed "Friendship" shows//
Subject/verb number disagreement.

>find find//

Repeated word.

>Twilight goes with the best intentions, and quickly discovers there is more than meets the eye going on in Ponyville…//

That's all one clause. There's no need for the comma. There's an explanation at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions." I see that this is an intermittent problem.

>fully-developed//

Two-word phrases beginning in an -ly adverb don't use a hyphen.

>her primal urges toward order and normalcy needed constant checking//

An example speaks far louder than a generality.

>52//

Spell out numbers that short.

>Twilight looked down awkwardly and swatted away a mosquito, avoiding the question.//

What does "awkwardly" mean here? There's no default way that looks, and who's making the judgment? Twilight's been holding the perspective, which suggests she's making this comment about herself. That's kind of odd. It's also better to demonstrate to me that she's avoiding the question than to have the narrator feed me that conclusion. That just leaves it as a dull fact.

>more confused than usual//

Again, make her look and act confused, and it'll carry a lot more weight than having the narrator say so. There's a bit more dicsussion in the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>I have learned much already, and look forward to learning more.//

Another unnecessary comma.

>however I was pleased to find not a single book in place//

This brings up a big world-building question: how long has Discord been in control? If a long time, then how is such a thing as being "in place" defined? If the norm is to have nothing grouped in any way, then isn't that "in place"? I see you address this point a little in a later chapter, but where Chaos is defined through its contrast from orderliness, isn't that just a different form of orderliness? I don't see how they perceive one versus the other, unless Discord came around only recently, and even then, why would the majority be so receptive to it?

>confectioners//

confectioner's

>Sugar Cube//

Per canon, Sugarcube, unless you're making a point of having it be multiple words.

>I met five other mares//

>any ponies I have ever met//
Watch the repetitive phrasing.

>In other related news, I brought the Magic of Chaos to three young fillies today though!//

That "though" feels awkward.

There's really no reason to have these letter be completely in italics. The point of italics is to make something stand out, like a short letter or flashback within a larger scene. But when everything stands out, nothing does. It'll already be evident this is a letter from the format, and it just gets annoying to read nonstop italics.

>They were having a picnic and I cast the “Need It Want It” spell on my old toy for them.//

Here's an opposite case. There are two clauses here, so put a comma between them.

>I visited the local music shop this week, and met with the proprietor//

Unnecessary comma.

>we experience everyday//

In this usage, you need "every day" to be two words.

>they are disinterested//

"Disinterested" doesn't mean the same thing as "uninterested." This word implies that they used to be interested but no longer are, and Twilight wouldn't know that about them.

>She is truly unique, I think you’d like her special brand of chaos, even if it sometimes seems geared toward unity instead of disharmony.//

That first comma is a splice.

>(quote)//

Given that she goes on to quote it, this is wholly unnecessary.

>scary//

Repetitive with the recent use in "scary castle."

>They were even solidly planted on the ground and all the bricks were in the walls!//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>my new Friends//

I guess I'm a little surprised that she's not reluctant to include herself as a Friend, since she sees that as something subversive. Wouldn't she be afraid of how Discord would react? Maybe she'd offer an explanation that she's trying to infiltrate the group or that she doesn't see any harm in it so far? I expect this theme will grow in subsequent letters, but it's strange for her to mention this in passing as if it's utterly unimportant.

>Everfree forest//

Capitalize both words.

>other and//

Extraneous space.

>I reminded her that I was Discord’s personal student, and asked if she was worried//

Unnecessary comma.

>I might tell write//

Extraneous word, or perhaps a missing slash?

>in opposition his teachings//

Missing word.

>At this point//

In your recent usage of "by this point," you used a comma after the introductory phrase, while you've gone without for pretty much any other such phrase. Just be consistent.

>Applejack and I were both very tired, and returned to town.//

Unnecessary comma.

>but she seemed annoyed//

I know I bugged you about "show versus tell" in the first chapter, but that one's a standard narrative. In a letter or journal entry, there are different ways to show, but it's much more acceptable to be blunt about emotions and motivations, since that's simply how people naturally write such things. It'd feel overly formal and forced if she went on at length about Applejack's body language, for instance. A little here and there can work, though, and I feel this is a spot where it might. What made her think Applejack was annoyed? Did Twilight just let it go, or did she ask about it?

>-Twilight Sparkle//

Why does she sign her own journal? It's not like the reader will be confused as to who's writing it.

>Honorable Emperor Discord;//

I just now noticed you've been using a semicolon after the salutations of all your letters. A comma is standard, though I've seen a colon used for a formal correspondence, usually in a business sense. I've never seen a semicolon used this way. Same goes for the closing.

>unified together//

Redundant.

>tolerate unpredictability//

Surprising word choice for her. I thought the dogma was that unpredictability should be enjoyed, not tolerated.

>Twilight Sparkler//

Is her name change evidence of chaos, or is this just a typo?

>I’ve decided to continue doing the same with the rest of my Friends, and glean everything I can from their thoughts and feelings on the subject.//

Unnecessary comma.

>All the steam-windows are solid now and the foam clouds crumbled into iced-coffee snow.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>somepony needed it more than her//

Technically, "more than she." I guess it's up to you whether Twilight knows that and would be fastidious about it.

>even when the coin lands on tails in our unpredictable world//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>I’ve decided to continue doing the same with the rest of my Friends, and glean everything I can from their thoughts and feelings on the subject//

Unnecessary comma.

>it seems Rarity wants to spread it around. Again, it seems//

Watch the repetition.

>I’m still drawn to the old castle and I plan on visiting again when the weather improves.//

Comma between the clauses.

>A dedication vow varies for everyone, but this one is mine.//

Interesting that she doesn't mind it being the same every time she says it. Or that it doesn't occur to her.

>keeping frostbite at bay//

Feels like there should be a "the" in there.

>solid.I//

Missing a space.

>I was shocked when she presented me with a large thick comforter//

Here's another spot where a bit more showing would add significant power. What kinds of things ran through her head? Beyond summarizing it as "shock," how did it make her feel, both the emotions and the accompanying physical symptoms. And here, "large thick" are coordinate adjectives, so they need a comma between them.

>as-is//

You're essentially using this as a predicate adjective, so it doesn't need the hyphen.

>a true friend helps a friend in need, and you’re one of mine//

We really haven't seen Twilight interact with Rarity much, so it's coming out of nowhere to suddenly have Rarity make a declaration like this.

>safe.Per//

Missing space.

>a pack of timber wolves noticed us, and chased us back inside!//

Unnecessary comma.

>and she said she considers it paramount to stay loyal to her friends, and not leave them behind//

Unnecessary comma, especially in that going without one helps differentiate the functions of the two "and"s, since the first one does use a comma.

>It’s not the tree, that’s still too far outside Ponyville to make a difference.//

Comma splice.

>My latest test of Chaos magic may have something to do with this…//

Speech affectations like interruptions and trailing off must always be carefully considered for a medium that doesn't support such things. The fact that the letter writer would have to consciously make three dots on the page implies that she put some thought into doing so and did it for a reason. Grammatically, you don't need an ellipsis, and I don't see that it adds any meaning. Even so, it doesn't quite fit in what would be a formal correspondence.

>over-crowded//

overcrowded

>friend//

She'd been capitalizing this.

>this ponies//

Number mismatch.

>being honesty//

Typo.

>Predictability fosters expectations, and inevitably leads to disappointment.//

Unnecessary comma.

>I have tried to compromise, and ended up betrayed everything.//

Unnecessary comma and verb form error.

>friend//

Another instance where I wonder if you intended to capitalize this consistently.

>Harmony is the opposite of Chaos and no mare can serve both.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>I came to Ponyville to make a study of the phenomenon known as Friendship, and report back on any threats it posed to the reign of Chaos over our great land//

Unnecessary comma.

>This principle stands in opposition to Chaos, and is most definitely a threat to all we’ve worked for.//

Unnecessary comma.

>harmonizers//

Would this be capitalized?

Okay, the one letter Discord sends back—the strikethroughs don't really make sense. He wasn't in a rush or anything. If he wrote something he later decided not to say, he can simply rewrite the letter. He's also not rushed to write anything. He can think about it at length before actually putting it on the paper. There are times when strikethroughs make sense, but they just don't here.

>I held off until sending them until I got Discord’s response//

That first "until" is extraneous.

>friends//

Rather than keep repeating this, I'll just say to scan your story for instances of this word that should be capitalized.

>Pinkie…//

Another speech affectation that seems odd and forced for a journal format.

>every few constantly//

Missing word.

>non-sensical//

nonsensical

>escherian//

First off, there's no need to get so purple here. You have a limited narrator in Twilight's perspective, who didn't do such in her own writings or in the introduction, when she held the same perspective. So this feels out of place. Second, this presupposes that there's an Escher figure in Equestrian history somewhere, which is problematic when another word would do as well without suggesting a thread which will go nowhere. It'd also need to be capitalized.

>anti-gravity//

antigravity

>pan-pipe//

panpipe

>your highness//

Such an honorific would be capitalized.

>superficially excited but actually somewhere between distraction and indifference//

Okay, now's definitely not the time to be telly. Show me what evidence she uses to come to this conclusion. This doesn't inspire me to come up with a mental image at all. It's just a cold fact, which doesn't make for very interesting reading.

>off-guard//

You don't need to hyphenate that in this usage.

>almost on the verge//

Redundant.

>a panic attack//

Again, show me. Give me what thoughts race through her head and what physical symptoms she experiences. And since it's a limited narration, let the prose itself take on a style and word choice to reflect her mood.

>Discord motioned from behind a large engraved oak desk, to a simple leather chair opposite his own.//

Unnecessary comma.

>I -//

Please use a proper dash. There's a section on dash use up top as well.

>she stopped as a clawed paw raise to silence her//

This is capitalized like a speech attribution, but it has no speaking action. As is, it should be a separate sentence.

>Twilight realized she was trembling and sweating.//

Authors like this type of conceit, even though it rarely makes sense and has become cliche. The classic one is "letting out a breath she didn't know she'd been holding." It's pretty hard to sweat or tremble without knowing it.

>The cowering unicorn felt tears pricking her eyes.//

So why are you backing off to an omniscient narration? This is decidedly external. Twilight wouldn't describe herself this way. I'll also note that this is getting very dialogue-heavy. Discord's said a lot, and yet he's only gotten one action thrown in since his monologue started. Even Twilight's only gotten a few perfunctory actions. The short version is that there is an entire nonverbal side to conversations, which you're neglecting here. There's a longer explanation in the section on talking heads.

>Her voice came haltingly.//

Another statement that feels more omniscient than limited.

>harmonizers//

Capitalize?

>There was no pre-planned malice behind in Discord’s torturous game, she knew him too well for that.//

Seems like the "in" is extraneous, and the comma is a splice.

>Discord’s voice was back to it’s cheery, devil-may-care babble.//

Its/it's confusion.

>All is forgiven and forgotten, go unpack somewhere and tomorrow we’ll get back to learning CHAOS!//

First comma is a splice, and there should be one later on between the clauses. It's also preferred to indicate emphasis or volume with italics instead of all caps or bold font.

>Yes..//

Missing a dot.

>hacky-sack//

hacky sack

>simply plain//

Redundant.

>It can however, be//

If you're going to set off "however" with a comma, you need one on both sides.

>they take forever to grow and I obviously didn’t use enough last time//

Comma between the clauses.

>grow, choking//

Extraneous space.

Normally, I'd make some wrap-up comments here, but I don't think it's necessary. I already covered everything I wanted to and in the level of detail I wanted in the line-by-line comments.

When you're ready to resubmit, choose the "back from Mars" option.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rumors of a strange phenomenon dubbed &quot;Friendship&quot; shows//</span><br />Subject/verb number disagreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;find find//</span><br />Repeated word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight goes with the best intentions, and quickly discovers there is more than meets the eye going on in Ponyville…//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. There&#039;s no need for the comma. There&#039;s an explanation at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot; I see that this is an intermittent problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fully-developed//</span><br />Two-word phrases beginning in an -ly adverb don&#039;t use a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her primal urges toward order and normalcy needed constant checking//</span><br />An example speaks far louder than a generality.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;52//</span><br />Spell out numbers that short.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight looked down awkwardly and swatted away a mosquito, avoiding the question.//</span><br />What does &quot;awkwardly&quot; mean here? There&#039;s no default way that looks, and who&#039;s making the judgment? Twilight&#039;s been holding the perspective, which suggests she&#039;s making this comment about herself. That&#039;s kind of odd. It&#039;s also better to demonstrate to me that she&#039;s avoiding the question than to have the narrator feed me that conclusion. That just leaves it as a dull fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;more confused than usual//</span><br />Again, make her look and act confused, and it&#039;ll carry a lot more weight than having the narrator say so. There&#039;s a bit more dicsussion in the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have learned much already, and look forward to learning more.//</span><br />Another unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;however I was pleased to find not a single book in place//</span><br />This brings up a big world-building question: how long has Discord been in control? If a long time, then how is such a thing as being &quot;in place&quot; defined? If the norm is to have nothing grouped in any way, then isn&#039;t that &quot;in place&quot;? I see you address this point a little in a later chapter, but where Chaos is defined through its contrast from orderliness, isn&#039;t that just a different form of orderliness? I don&#039;t see how they perceive one versus the other, unless Discord came around only recently, and even then, why would the majority be so receptive to it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;confectioners//</span><br />confectioner&#039;s<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sugar Cube//</span><br />Per canon, Sugarcube, unless you&#039;re making a point of having it be multiple words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I met five other mares//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;any ponies I have ever met//</span><br />Watch the repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In other related news, I brought the Magic of Chaos to three young fillies today though!//</span><br />That &quot;though&quot; feels awkward.<br /><br />There&#039;s really no reason to have these letter be completely in italics. The point of italics is to make something stand out, like a short letter or flashback within a larger scene. But when everything stands out, nothing does. It&#039;ll already be evident this is a letter from the format, and it just gets annoying to read nonstop italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They were having a picnic and I cast the “Need It Want It” spell on my old toy for them.//</span><br />Here&#039;s an opposite case. There are two clauses here, so put a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I visited the local music shop this week, and met with the proprietor//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we experience everyday//</span><br />In this usage, you need &quot;every day&quot; to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they are disinterested//</span><br />&quot;Disinterested&quot; doesn&#039;t mean the same thing as &quot;uninterested.&quot; This word implies that they used to be interested but no longer are, and Twilight wouldn&#039;t know that about them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She is truly unique, I think you’d like her special brand of chaos, even if it sometimes seems geared toward unity instead of disharmony.//</span><br />That first comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(quote)//</span><br />Given that she goes on to quote it, this is wholly unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;scary//</span><br />Repetitive with the recent use in &quot;scary castle.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They were even solidly planted on the ground and all the bricks were in the walls!//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;my new Friends//</span><br />I guess I&#039;m a little surprised that she&#039;s not reluctant to include herself as a Friend, since she sees that as something subversive. Wouldn&#039;t she be afraid of how Discord would react? Maybe she&#039;d offer an explanation that she&#039;s trying to infiltrate the group or that she doesn&#039;t see any harm in it so far? I expect this theme will grow in subsequent letters, but it&#039;s strange for her to mention this in passing as if it&#039;s utterly unimportant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everfree forest//</span><br />Capitalize both words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;other and//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I reminded her that I was Discord’s personal student, and asked if she was worried//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I might tell write//</span><br />Extraneous word, or perhaps a missing slash?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in opposition his teachings//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At this point//</span><br />In your recent usage of &quot;by this point,&quot; you used a comma after the introductory phrase, while you&#039;ve gone without for pretty much any other such phrase. Just be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack and I were both very tired, and returned to town.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but she seemed annoyed//</span><br />I know I bugged you about &quot;show versus tell&quot; in the first chapter, but that one&#039;s a standard narrative. In a letter or journal entry, there are different ways to show, but it&#039;s much more acceptable to be blunt about emotions and motivations, since that&#039;s simply how people naturally write such things. It&#039;d feel overly formal and forced if she went on at length about Applejack&#039;s body language, for instance. A little here and there can work, though, and I feel this is a spot where it might. What made her think Applejack was annoyed? Did Twilight just let it go, or did she ask about it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;-Twilight Sparkle//</span><br />Why does she sign her own journal? It&#039;s not like the reader will be confused as to who&#039;s writing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Honorable Emperor Discord;//</span><br />I just now noticed you&#039;ve been using a semicolon after the salutations of all your letters. A comma is standard, though I&#039;ve seen a colon used for a formal correspondence, usually in a business sense. I&#039;ve never seen a semicolon used this way. Same goes for the closing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unified together//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tolerate unpredictability//</span><br />Surprising word choice for her. I thought the dogma was that unpredictability should be enjoyed, not tolerated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight Sparkler//</span><br />Is her name change evidence of chaos, or is this just a typo?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve decided to continue doing the same with the rest of my Friends, and glean everything I can from their thoughts and feelings on the subject.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All the steam-windows are solid now and the foam clouds crumbled into iced-coffee snow.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;somepony needed it more than her//</span><br />Technically, &quot;more than she.&quot; I guess it&#039;s up to you whether Twilight knows that and would be fastidious about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even when the coin lands on tails in our unpredictable world//</span><br />Comma for the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve decided to continue doing the same with the rest of my Friends, and glean everything I can from their thoughts and feelings on the subject//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it seems Rarity wants to spread it around. Again, it seems//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m still drawn to the old castle and I plan on visiting again when the weather improves.//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A dedication vow varies for everyone, but this one is mine.//</span><br />Interesting that she doesn&#039;t mind it being the same every time she says it. Or that it doesn&#039;t occur to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;keeping frostbite at bay//</span><br />Feels like there should be a &quot;the&quot; in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;solid.I//</span><br />Missing a space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was shocked when she presented me with a large thick comforter//</span><br />Here&#039;s another spot where a bit more showing would add significant power. What kinds of things ran through her head? Beyond summarizing it as &quot;shock,&quot; how did it make her feel, both the emotions and the accompanying physical symptoms. And here, &quot;large thick&quot; are coordinate adjectives, so they need a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as-is//</span><br />You&#039;re essentially using this as a predicate adjective, so it doesn&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a true friend helps a friend in need, and you’re one of mine//</span><br />We really haven&#039;t seen Twilight interact with Rarity much, so it&#039;s coming out of nowhere to suddenly have Rarity make a declaration like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;safe.Per//</span><br />Missing space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a pack of timber wolves noticed us, and chased us back inside!//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she said she considers it paramount to stay loyal to her friends, and not leave them behind//</span><br />Unnecessary comma, especially in that going without one helps differentiate the functions of the two &quot;and&quot;s, since the first one does use a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s not the tree, that’s still too far outside Ponyville to make a difference.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My latest test of Chaos magic may have something to do with this…//</span><br />Speech affectations like interruptions and trailing off must always be carefully considered for a medium that doesn&#039;t support such things. The fact that the letter writer would have to consciously make three dots on the page implies that she put some thought into doing so and did it for a reason. Grammatically, you don&#039;t need an ellipsis, and I don&#039;t see that it adds any meaning. Even so, it doesn&#039;t quite fit in what would be a formal correspondence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;over-crowded//</span><br />overcrowded<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;friend//</span><br />She&#039;d been capitalizing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;this ponies//</span><br />Number mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;being honesty//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Predictability fosters expectations, and inevitably leads to disappointment.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have tried to compromise, and ended up betrayed everything.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma and verb form error.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;friend//</span><br />Another instance where I wonder if you intended to capitalize this consistently.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Harmony is the opposite of Chaos and no mare can serve both.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I came to Ponyville to make a study of the phenomenon known as Friendship, and report back on any threats it posed to the reign of Chaos over our great land//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This principle stands in opposition to Chaos, and is most definitely a threat to all we’ve worked for.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;harmonizers//</span><br />Would this be capitalized?<br /><br />Okay, the one letter Discord sends back—the strikethroughs don&#039;t really make sense. He wasn&#039;t in a rush or anything. If he wrote something he later decided not to say, he can simply rewrite the letter. He&#039;s also not rushed to write anything. He can think about it at length before actually putting it on the paper. There are times when strikethroughs make sense, but they just don&#039;t here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I held off until sending them until I got Discord’s response//</span><br />That first &quot;until&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;friends//</span><br />Rather than keep repeating this, I&#039;ll just say to scan your story for instances of this word that should be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie…//</span><br />Another speech affectation that seems odd and forced for a journal format.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;every few constantly//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;non-sensical//</span><br />nonsensical<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;escherian//</span><br />First off, there&#039;s no need to get so purple here. You have a limited narrator in Twilight&#039;s perspective, who didn&#039;t do such in her own writings or in the introduction, when she held the same perspective. So this feels out of place. Second, this presupposes that there&#039;s an Escher figure in Equestrian history somewhere, which is problematic when another word would do as well without suggesting a thread which will go nowhere. It&#039;d also need to be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;anti-gravity//</span><br />antigravity<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;pan-pipe//</span><br />panpipe<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your highness//</span><br />Such an honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;superficially excited but actually somewhere between distraction and indifference//</span><br />Okay, now&#039;s definitely not the time to be telly. Show me what evidence she uses to come to this conclusion. This doesn&#039;t inspire me to come up with a mental image at all. It&#039;s just a cold fact, which doesn&#039;t make for very interesting reading.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;off-guard//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to hyphenate that in this usage.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;almost on the verge//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a panic attack//</span><br />Again, show me. Give me what thoughts race through her head and what physical symptoms she experiences. And since it&#039;s a limited narration, let the prose itself take on a style and word choice to reflect her mood.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discord motioned from behind a large engraved oak desk, to a simple leather chair opposite his own.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I -//</span><br />Please use a proper dash. There&#039;s a section on dash use up top as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she stopped as a clawed paw raise to silence her//</span><br />This is capitalized like a speech attribution, but it has no speaking action. As is, it should be a separate sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight realized she was trembling and sweating.//</span><br />Authors like this type of conceit, even though it rarely makes sense and has become cliche. The classic one is &quot;letting out a breath she didn&#039;t know she&#039;d been holding.&quot; It&#039;s pretty hard to sweat or tremble without knowing it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The cowering unicorn felt tears pricking her eyes.//</span><br />So why are you backing off to an omniscient narration? This is decidedly external. Twilight wouldn&#039;t describe herself this way. I&#039;ll also note that this is getting very dialogue-heavy. Discord&#039;s said a lot, and yet he&#039;s only gotten one action thrown in since his monologue started. Even Twilight&#039;s only gotten a few perfunctory actions. The short version is that there is an entire nonverbal side to conversations, which you&#039;re neglecting here. There&#039;s a longer explanation in the section on talking heads.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her voice came haltingly.//</span><br />Another statement that feels more omniscient than limited.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;harmonizers//</span><br />Capitalize?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was no pre-planned malice behind in Discord’s torturous game, she knew him too well for that.//</span><br />Seems like the &quot;in&quot; is extraneous, and the comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discord’s voice was back to it’s cheery, devil-may-care babble.//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All is forgiven and forgotten, go unpack somewhere and tomorrow we’ll get back to learning CHAOS!//</span><br />First comma is a splice, and there should be one later on between the clauses. It&#039;s also preferred to indicate emphasis or volume with italics instead of all caps or bold font.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes..//</span><br />Missing a dot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hacky-sack//</span><br />hacky sack<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;simply plain//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It can however, be//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to set off &quot;however&quot; with a comma, you need one on both sides.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they take forever to grow and I obviously didn’t use enough last time//</span><br />Comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;grow, choking//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br />Normally, I&#039;d make some wrap-up comments here, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary. I already covered everything I wanted to and in the level of detail I wanted in the line-by-line comments.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, choose the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br />

caligari87Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 337

>>131509
Thank you so much for all the detailed feedback! I've gone through, fixed the errors you mentioned (plus a few others as I noticed them) and rewrote several other parts slightly per recommendation.

I kept a Google Doc HERE where I crossed off each item as I addressed it, along with the action I took.

A few items of note:

For the italics: I think I wish to leave the letters/journals italicized. Other non-letter parts of the story are non-italicized, and it conveys to me a sense of “handwritten” in lieu of a proper font. Still, this isn’t set in stone, I suppose. Would the [quote] tag be better for this (as used in the sequel), even if the entire chapter is “quoted”?

On the dogma of Chaos, ponies are naturally harmonious creatures I think, and the slow growth of the Tree of Harmony has a wider, more subtle influence than Twilight suspects. Discord's rule isn't generally accepted, but most don't know any better. For Twilight's dedication vow, hers is constant. Others might vary theirs, but I she holds more to stability than she likes to admit. It would bug her too much to not have it memorized.

I did dial back the "true friend" moment with Rarity, hope it comes off a little more natural this time around. I do think there's more than written happening behind the scenes, and the moments Twilight mentions are only a few.

Finally, I know the last moments with discord are VERY dialogue-heavy. In the end I feel the words need to stand on their own. I tried several times to break it up, and I found it too distracting from the message. I've noticed I do this a lot in the sequel as well. Maybe it's a flaw, but I love me a good monologue. I'll try to work on that in the future.

Again, thanks you so much. I've realized a lot of things about my writing that I need to work on.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#131509" onclick="return highlight('131509', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|131509">&gt;&gt;131509</a><br />Thank you so much for all the detailed feedback! I&#039;ve gone through, fixed the errors you mentioned (plus a few others as I noticed them) and rewrote several other parts slightly per recommendation.<br /><br />I kept a Google Doc <a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ImHCnvQ-o4gE_z4-pJ7yhrDMJi0GndDKsHaexKVxmfg/edit?usp=sharing">HERE</a> <span class="externallinkdomain">[docs.google.com]</span> where I crossed off each item as I addressed it, along with the action I took. <br /><br />A few items of note:<br /><br />For the italics: I think I wish to leave the letters/journals italicized. Other non-letter parts of the story are non-italicized, and it conveys to me a sense of “handwritten” in lieu of a proper font. Still, this isn’t set in stone, I suppose. Would the [quote] tag be better for this (as used in the sequel), even if the entire chapter is “quoted”?<br /><br />On the dogma of Chaos, ponies are naturally harmonious creatures I think, and the slow growth of the Tree of Harmony has a wider, more subtle influence than Twilight suspects. Discord&#039;s rule isn&#039;t generally accepted, but most don&#039;t know any better. For Twilight&#039;s dedication vow, hers is constant. Others might vary theirs, but I she holds more to stability than she likes to admit. It would bug her too much to not have it memorized.<br /><br />I did dial back the &quot;true friend&quot; moment with Rarity, hope it comes off a little more natural this time around. I do think there&#039;s more than written happening behind the scenes, and the moments Twilight mentions are only a few. <br /><br />Finally, I know the last moments with discord are VERY dialogue-heavy. In the end I feel the words need to stand on their own. I tried several times to break it up, and I found it too distracting from the message. I&#039;ve noticed I do this a lot in the sequel as well. Maybe it&#039;s a flaw, but I love me a good monologue. I&#039;ll try to work on that in the future. <br /><br />Again, thanks you so much. I&#039;ve realized a lot of things about my writing that I need to work on.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 338

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The language in the early going about shaking the spoons and speaking for them gets a little repetitive. A lot of the sentences are similar in structure as well. Try to mix that up a bit more.

You're using a limited narrator here, who can speak the character's thoughts for her. For instance:
>It was that time again.//
and
>Couldn't risk such important information falling into the wrong hooves, after all.//
This is fine, but look for opportunities to put more of these comment-type statements in the narration to keep that feel consistent. Just a little later, when she gets a faceful of water, I'd expect an emotional reaction from her, which is the perfect place for this type of narration. Yet we're kept at a distance, and the narrator gets very factual. In fact, another advantage to these statements is that they can feel very conversational, so the rules of grammar get relaxed. You can get away with quick sentence fragments, which further helps you break up passages where you have a lot of similarly structured sentences together. For instance, look how often you have three or four sentences that start with "she" very close together.

>but stopped suddenly//

We're given no reason why she does this. Maybe when her mother calls her, but that's mentioned afterward, so it's putting the effect before the cause.

>Her yelp of pain//

Here's another spot where you should be using the limited narrator to its full advantage. How does she feel about this? Let me see her reaction, both mental and physical.

>a foreleg spoons//

Missing word(s). Man, this is really reminding me of one of the characters from Mystery Men.

>eye-level//

As used, you don't need the hyphen.

>Her eyes//

Her eyes were just the subject of the last sentence. This feels repetitive.

>and suspicion was rising in Silver//

Awkwardly phrased. I get that you're likening this to the steam, but it's not especially effective. You'd do better to show me her actions and make her look suspicious.

>made some modifications to make//

Watch the repetition. Again, use the narrator to effect here. She yelled about her clothes, but during this very factual description, it undercuts her reaction. She needs to continue sounding angry as she narrates this.

>It felt more than a little gross//

Here's a good comedic moment. Stretch it out a bit. What things does it feel like to her?

>that was, like, the number-one rule of being a superhero//

Using her speech affectation like this is fine, but do so more consistently. It feels out of place when we've already heard so much from her without her using it yet.

>both being placed carefully in the closet.//

Awkwardly phrased and needlessly passive.

Ooh, Silver Spoon is taking on Diamond Tiara. This is a nice turn of events.

>as she turned her eyes to the gray filly as she stood in the center of the lobby//

Watch stacking up multiple "as" clauses. It's clunky and repetitive.

>standing proud//

Let me see this. Describe her posture and facial expression and get me to interpret pride without actually using the word.

>Silver Spoon wears glasses//

Nobody's going to mention the braid?

>Snips shook his head.//

You're neglecting the narration a bit here. I appreciate that you're doing a good job of showing with these actions, but they're so quick-hit that they feel so minimal. Set the scene better. These can also lead to paragraph after paragraph with identical structures.

>in mild disbelief//

Again, get me to see this. Don't spoon (heh) feed me the conclusion.

>as the costumed filly let out a squeal of surprise//

These prepositional phrases are almost always redundant. The squeal already connotes surprise. But note how external this narration suddenly feels. Silver wouldn't describe herself this way, so you've lost the limited narration quality.

>becoming replaced with one of mild disgust//

Don't just tell me it's disgust. And actor would declare his disgust here. He'd behave and appear disgusted so that the audience can infer it. Your characters should do the same. You did a better job of this early in the story, but it's more important to get it right here, since this is the story's climax.

>she punctuating her rant//

Typo.

>Silver was sitting there, staring up at her as her violet eyes watered, little streaks forming from the tears running down her face and dripping onto the street.//

Don't lose the limited narrator. This is again very external to Silver. Put me in her head again and have the narrator convey her thoughts and reactions as if she were telling me herself. That was a lot of the story's charm, seeing the grandiose posturing she did in the narration while getting ready for her mission, but it's gone now.

>"Hey, I didn't mean…." but she trailed off as Silver's gaze moved to the dirt road under her.//

You're missing something here, a speaking verb, at least.

>her trusty giant spoon flew over//

I'm still at a loss as to how she does this… Cutie mark, I guess?

This really needs a better ending. Diamond just conveniently drops her snark, and there's no apparent reason why, except maybe she doesn't want to see her friend upset like that, but it's not at all apparent from how she acts. The conflict isn't resolved; it just fades away. For a comedy, you'd like to end it on some kind of funny zonger, but before that, we need some closure on what's going on with Diamond. There are a bunch of ways you could go. For instance, I already mentioned that maybe Diamond feels bad about making Silver cry. They might make up, and the reader realizes Diamond's not so bad after all. Or you could go the funny route and have Diamond decide she thinks this is cool after all, and she begs to be Silver's sidekick while deciding what kind of talent she brings to the table. Just spitballing here, but those are the kinds of ways you come out of the story with a message, not just having the story vaguely end.

I thought this story was very fun and cute, and really, there's not that much you need to do to fix it up. I'd like to see it on the blog. If you have any questions, please ask.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />The language in the early going about shaking the spoons and speaking for them gets a little repetitive. A lot of the sentences are similar in structure as well. Try to mix that up a bit more.<br /><br />You&#039;re using a limited narrator here, who can speak the character&#039;s thoughts for her. For instance:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was that time again.//</span><br />and<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Couldn&#039;t risk such important information falling into the wrong hooves, after all.//</span><br />This is fine, but look for opportunities to put more of these comment-type statements in the narration to keep that feel consistent. Just a little later, when she gets a faceful of water, I&#039;d expect an emotional reaction from her, which is the perfect place for this type of narration. Yet we&#039;re kept at a distance, and the narrator gets very factual. In fact, another advantage to these statements is that they can feel very conversational, so the rules of grammar get relaxed. You can get away with quick sentence fragments, which further helps you break up passages where you have a lot of similarly structured sentences together. For instance, look how often you have three or four sentences that start with &quot;she&quot; very close together.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but stopped suddenly//</span><br />We&#039;re given no reason why she does this. Maybe when her mother calls her, but that&#039;s mentioned afterward, so it&#039;s putting the effect before the cause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her yelp of pain//</span><br />Here&#039;s another spot where you should be using the limited narrator to its full advantage. How does she feel about this? Let me see her reaction, both mental and physical.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a foreleg spoons//</span><br />Missing word(s). Man, this is really reminding me of one of the characters from Mystery Men.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eye-level//</span><br />As used, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes//</span><br />Her eyes were just the subject of the last sentence. This feels repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and suspicion was rising in Silver//</span><br />Awkwardly phrased. I get that you&#039;re likening this to the steam, but it&#039;s not especially effective. You&#039;d do better to show me her actions and make her look suspicious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;made some modifications to make//</span><br />Watch the repetition. Again, use the narrator to effect here. She yelled about her clothes, but during this very factual description, it undercuts her reaction. She needs to continue sounding angry as she narrates this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It felt more than a little gross//</span><br />Here&#039;s a good comedic moment. Stretch it out a bit. What things does it feel like to her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that was, like, the number-one rule of being a superhero//</span><br />Using her speech affectation like this is fine, but do so more consistently. It feels out of place when we&#039;ve already heard so much from her without her using it yet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;both being placed carefully in the closet.//</span><br />Awkwardly phrased and needlessly passive.<br /><br />Ooh, Silver Spoon is taking on Diamond Tiara. This is a nice turn of events.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she turned her eyes to the gray filly as she stood in the center of the lobby//</span><br />Watch stacking up multiple &quot;as&quot; clauses. It&#039;s clunky and repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;standing proud//</span><br />Let me see this. Describe her posture and facial expression and get me to interpret pride without actually using the word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silver Spoon wears glasses//</span><br />Nobody&#039;s going to mention the braid?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Snips shook his head.//</span><br />You&#039;re neglecting the narration a bit here. I appreciate that you&#039;re doing a good job of showing with these actions, but they&#039;re so quick-hit that they feel so minimal. Set the scene better. These can also lead to paragraph after paragraph with identical structures.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in mild disbelief//</span><br />Again, get me to see this. Don&#039;t spoon (heh) feed me the conclusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as the costumed filly let out a squeal of surprise//</span><br />These prepositional phrases are almost always redundant. The squeal already connotes surprise. But note how external this narration suddenly feels. Silver wouldn&#039;t describe herself this way, so you&#039;ve lost the limited narration quality.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;becoming replaced with one of mild disgust//</span><br />Don&#039;t just tell me it&#039;s disgust. And actor would declare his disgust here. He&#039;d behave and appear disgusted so that the audience can infer it. Your characters should do the same. You did a better job of this early in the story, but it&#039;s more important to get it right here, since this is the story&#039;s climax.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she punctuating her rant//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silver was sitting there, staring up at her as her violet eyes watered, little streaks forming from the tears running down her face and dripping onto the street.//</span><br />Don&#039;t lose the limited narrator. This is again very external to Silver. Put me in her head again and have the narrator convey her thoughts and reactions as if she were telling me herself. That was a lot of the story&#039;s charm, seeing the grandiose posturing she did in the narration while getting ready for her mission, but it&#039;s gone now.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Hey, I didn&#039;t mean….&quot; but she trailed off as Silver&#039;s gaze moved to the dirt road under her.//</span><br />You&#039;re missing something here, a speaking verb, at least.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her trusty giant spoon flew over//</span><br />I&#039;m still at a loss as to how she does this… Cutie mark, I guess?<br /><br />This really needs a better ending. Diamond just conveniently drops her snark, and there&#039;s no apparent reason why, except maybe she doesn&#039;t want to see her friend upset like that, but it&#039;s not at all apparent from how she acts. The conflict isn&#039;t resolved; it just fades away. For a comedy, you&#039;d like to end it on some kind of funny zonger, but before that, we need some closure on what&#039;s going on with Diamond. There are a bunch of ways you could go. For instance, I already mentioned that maybe Diamond feels bad about making Silver cry. They might make up, and the reader realizes Diamond&#039;s not so bad after all. Or you could go the funny route and have Diamond decide she thinks this is cool after all, and she begs to be Silver&#039;s sidekick while deciding what kind of talent she brings to the table. Just spitballing here, but those are the kinds of ways you come out of the story with a message, not just having the story vaguely end.<br /><br />I thought this story was very fun and cute, and really, there&#039;s not that much you need to do to fix it up. I&#039;d like to see it on the blog. If you have any questions, please ask.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 339

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>long, red//
These are hierarchical adjectives, so you don't need the comma.

>Few notice her, but those that do know exactly why she is there.//

You're referring to ponies, so they are a "who," not a "that."

Story:
>Though an Equestrian city, the residents of the port city had worked hard to maintain a strong link to the city’s past//
Watch the close word repetition. You use "city" three times in one sentence. And the wording here sounds like the residents are an Equestrian city.

>central median//

Pretty redundant.

>None of which she could even pronounce, much less pick apart from one another.//

You'd really only capitalize after an ellipse, if it's grammatically necessary to start a new sentence, but this one parses fine.

>But,//

It's pretty rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one is not. They aren't meant to indicate dramatic pauses.

>said-//

Please use a proper dash. Alt+0151 gives you a nice, all-purpose em dash.

>It spoke to her on a level that only she could understand//

This is left rather vague and abstract. What sorts of images or memories does it conjure? Examples speak much louder than generalities.

>hear - a//

Use a dash.

>Few paid her more than a glance as she worked her way through the streets, but those that did could not help but turn back for a second look as she danced past.//

Pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, which can also muddle the timeline. And then you had yet another "as" clause just before this.

>hay bacon wraps//

I don't get how this is a thing. I assume you're talking about hay that is made into a bacon-like product rather than these being two separate ingredients, but that nomenclature would still suggest that bacon was a foodstuff first, and that doesn't quite make sense for a presumably vegetarian society.

>- known simply as ‘La Rosa’ to locals -//

Dashes, please. Just do a sweep for these.

>Her flower business boomed enough//

This is in the story's past, so use past perfect tense.

>speeding up and slowing down in perfect harmony//

Maybe you're mixing metaphors here, but it just comes across as confusing. When you're already talking about music, "harmony" takes on a certain meaning, and then you use it in a different way.

>with perfect timing with the music.//

Awkwardly phrased. I'd say "in perfect time with the music," except that's repetitive with the "with the tempo of the music" you used earlier in the same sentence.

>The tempo picked up even more as the song reached its crescendo//

Two things here. First, this is the second of three sentences in a row to use an "as" clause. Watch the repetitive elements. Second, I wonder if you really mean what the technical language says. A crescendo is a process of growing louder, which would happen multiple times during the dance. I wonder if you meant something closer to "climax"?

>sequence of steps//

>series of rapid steps//
>his steps//
Watch the repetition.

>She looked up into his eyes and a furious blush ran across her face.//

There are times before this that you'd violated this guideline. but I found them justified. Not so much here. There are two separate clauses, so put a comma between them.

>Every fiber of her conscience was telling her to look away//

There are times a present participle is needed, but I don't think it is here. If you phrased it with "told" instead of "was telling," does it change anything? It doesn't to me, and then you also get to remove that boring "to be" auxiliary verb.

>in disbelief//

There's no need to be so unsubtle. Her mood is already adequately described by the other things you say about her, so you could cut this without losing anything.

>like shimmering waterfall//

Missing word.

>A gorgeous dress covered most of her pale yellow coat in such a deep black, the glimmering fabric looked to have been cut from the night sky itself.//

Comma splice.

>to flow over her every curve, concealing her as much as it highlighted her every curve//

Repetitive. There's also the beginnings of a perspective problem here. The narrator's been in her perspective and taking a conversational tone at times, yet here, this sounds more external to her. It'd be odd for her to make these observations about herself, and she's also so preoccupied with what's happening that I don't think she'd be paying attention anyway.

>She could feel the stallion’s eyes on her now, boring into her with a heat that she could feel//

Repetitive.

>Draping her coat over the chair, she swung around to face him, adding a bit of a hitch to her hips as she did so.//

In addition to the "as" clauses, there are quite a few participial phrases. At least they're not occurring in clusters so much, but they come with their own baggage. For one thing, they imply simultaneous action, so she drapes her coat over the chair at the same time that she turns to face him. That'd more likely occur in sequence. Then adding the hitch is also implied to happen concurrently.

>“I-I’d love to, but,” she looked into his eyes and had to fight back the urge to swoon, “this is your performance//

Here's how to put a narrative aside in a quote:
“I-I’d love to, but—” she looked into his eyes and had to fight back the urge to swoon “—this is your performance
I see there are other instances of the same issue later on.

>split-second//

In that usage, you don't need the hyphen.

>but this time, and an entirely new beat//

Extraneous word.

>She turned her head and her eyes widened//

Put a comma between these clauses.

>equipment in the far corner of the room. 'I’d expect to see that kind of equipment//

Watch the repetition.

>the stallion that//

The stallion is a "who," not a "that."

>He matched her at first before accelerating his steps, occasionally raising a hoof to accentuate his movements.//

This is all pretty vague.

>as she quickly picked up the cadence of his hooves as they tapped the stage floor and sped her own steps to match//

Stacked-up "as" clauses again, and more repetition of "steps" around here.

>Adrenaline, nerves, and sheer joy raced through her veins//

This isn't bad, but it'd strengthen things if you focus on the symptoms, like what images are flashing through her mind and what physical sensations she has.

>perfectly-measured//

No hyphen is needed for two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb.

>She glanced to her side for a second, and smiled at the sight of the audience watching in rapt silence.//

The opposite issue, and the one I've let slide numerous times because it felt right for the flow: that's all one clause, so you don't need the comma.

>his eyes had seemingly never left her for a moment//

But the last time it was mentioned where he was looking, it explicitly said he wasn't looking at her.

>for a moment, his stare not faltering for even a moment//

Repetitive.

>His eyes, the entrancing rhythm, the dozens of eyes watching her//

Fairly repetitive mention of eyes.

>split-second//

Same as before.

>bow - a//

Use a dash. Actually, a colon would work well here.

>Her eyes seemed to glow brighter//

Again, you've dropped into an outside perspective. This isn't something she would know. I think a limited narrator is probably the best choice for this story, and you're mostly using that. But these slips into an omniscient feel push me away from the character. Be careful to keep it all to what she could reasonably know, perceive, or pay attention to.

>beautiful, silk//

These are hierarchical adjectives. You don't need a comma between them.

>tempo//

That's another word you're using an awful lot.

>again, he was right beside her. She stared at him again//

Repetition.

>- and more than a hint of desire -//

Use dashes.

>nor did their hooves stop tapping and stomping in perfect harmony//

See earlier comment about the use of "harmony" in this context.

>- to live -//

Use dashes.

>inside-out//

No hyphen.

>the music rose toward its peak//

You just used "peak" to describe this in the last paragraph.

>a careful observer may have seen sparks of red and green magic crackling across the floor//

Straying from her perspective again.

>She spun by him a final time as the last notes of the music played out, only now she spun right into his hooves.//

Comma splice.

>in a seamless motion//

You just used "seamless" not long ago. There are plenty of other words that would work: unbroken, fluid, smooth, …

>and looked into her blazing green eyes//

Doesn't sound like her perspective.

>- and what might happen soon after that -//

Use dashes.

>as a sign of the crowd’s admiration for the performance they had just witnessed//

A completely redundant and unnecessary clarification.

>She felt a touch on her leg and when she looked down, she saw his hoof wrapped gently around her own.//

Comma splice, but in her current emotional state, I could buy it as a product of her rushed thoughts.

>now disheveled//

Needs a hyphen.

>life.” He whispered//

I assume this is supposed to be an attribution, but it's not punctuated/capitalized like one.

>resist - she//

Use a dash.

In this last scene, the paragraph indentations get inconsistent.

I must confess that I know a lot more about music than dance, so if you have a technical knowledge about flamenco, then I'll bow to your expertise. But if it's not something you're particularly informed about or haven't researched much, then there's a book I'd like to refer you to. Rather, I'd just send you the brief section about flamenco, but I'm not going to spend the time typing it out if you don't need it. I think it could lend a little more technical accuracy, though I don't have the experience with dance to know if what the author says is true in general. He does research on music in culture and has a level of knowledge about music that I'd place well above casual, but I don't know if the same is true for the dance aspect. Anyway, if you think it would help, I'd gladly send it along to you. It's even a nice narrative about how to find the real thing that the locals appreciate, not the superficial one for the tourists.

I have mixed feelings about the ending. We're built up over the entire story to be invested in Roseluck's feelings on the matter, but then she gets completely dropped. We can infer a little from the rose she left behind, but really, her arc never completes. Is she fulfilled now? Or is she going to pine away now that she's achieved her life's dream and has nothing left to wish for? The fact that we get the stallion's aftermath is nice, at least, but we were never particularly engaged with him, so it carries far less power.

This was a good story. There's not much to fix here—just some easy mechanical and repetitive elements, and a few wavers in perspective. When you're ready to resubmit, use the "back from Mars" option.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />Synopsis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long, red//</span><br />These are hierarchical adjectives, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Few notice her, but those that do know exactly why she is there.//</span><br />You&#039;re referring to ponies, so they are a &quot;who,&quot; not a &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br />Story:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Though an Equestrian city, the residents of the port city had worked hard to maintain a strong link to the city’s past//</span><br />Watch the close word repetition. You use &quot;city&quot; three times in one sentence. And the wording here sounds like the residents are an Equestrian city.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;central median//</span><br />Pretty redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;None of which she could even pronounce, much less pick apart from one another.//</span><br />You&#039;d really only capitalize after an ellipse, if it&#039;s grammatically necessary to start a new sentence, but this one parses fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But,//</span><br />It&#039;s pretty rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one is not. They aren&#039;t meant to indicate dramatic pauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said-//</span><br />Please use a proper dash. Alt+0151 gives you a nice, all-purpose em dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It spoke to her on a level that only she could understand//</span><br />This is left rather vague and abstract. What sorts of images or memories does it conjure? Examples speak much louder than generalities.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hear - a//</span><br />Use a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Few paid her more than a glance as she worked her way through the streets, but those that did could not help but turn back for a second look as she danced past.//</span><br />Pretty clunky to have two &quot;as&quot; clauses in the same sentence, which can also muddle the timeline. And then you had yet another &quot;as&quot; clause just before this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hay bacon wraps//</span><br />I don&#039;t get how this is a thing. I assume you&#039;re talking about hay that is made into a bacon-like product rather than these being two separate ingredients, but that nomenclature would still suggest that bacon was a foodstuff first, and that doesn&#039;t quite make sense for a presumably vegetarian society.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- known simply as ‘La Rosa’ to locals -//</span><br />Dashes, please. Just do a sweep for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her flower business boomed enough//</span><br />This is in the story&#039;s past, so use past perfect tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;speeding up and slowing down in perfect harmony//</span><br />Maybe you&#039;re mixing metaphors here, but it just comes across as confusing. When you&#039;re already talking about music, &quot;harmony&quot; takes on a certain meaning, and then you use it in a different way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with perfect timing with the music.//</span><br />Awkwardly phrased. I&#039;d say &quot;in perfect time with the music,&quot; except that&#039;s repetitive with the &quot;with the tempo of the music&quot; you used earlier in the same sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The tempo picked up even more as the song reached its crescendo//</span><br />Two things here. First, this is the second of three sentences in a row to use an &quot;as&quot; clause. Watch the repetitive elements. Second, I wonder if you really mean what the technical language says. A crescendo is a process of growing louder, which would happen multiple times during the dance. I wonder if you meant something closer to &quot;climax&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sequence of steps//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;series of rapid steps//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his steps//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She looked up into his eyes and a furious blush ran across her face.//</span><br />There are times before this that you&#039;d violated this guideline. but I found them justified. Not so much here. There are two separate clauses, so put a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Every fiber of her conscience was telling her to look away//</span><br />There are times a present participle is needed, but I don&#039;t think it is here. If you phrased it with &quot;told&quot; instead of &quot;was telling,&quot; does it change anything? It doesn&#039;t to me, and then you also get to remove that boring &quot;to be&quot; auxiliary verb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in disbelief//</span><br />There&#039;s no need to be so unsubtle. Her mood is already adequately described by the other things you say about her, so you could cut this without losing anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;like shimmering waterfall//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A gorgeous dress covered most of her pale yellow coat in such a deep black, the glimmering fabric looked to have been cut from the night sky itself.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to flow over her every curve, concealing her as much as it highlighted her every curve//</span><br />Repetitive. There&#039;s also the beginnings of a perspective problem here. The narrator&#039;s been in her perspective and taking a conversational tone at times, yet here, this sounds more external to her. It&#039;d be odd for her to make these observations about herself, and she&#039;s also so preoccupied with what&#039;s happening that I don&#039;t think she&#039;d be paying attention anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could feel the stallion’s eyes on her now, boring into her with a heat that she could feel//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Draping her coat over the chair, she swung around to face him, adding a bit of a hitch to her hips as she did so.//</span><br />In addition to the &quot;as&quot; clauses, there are quite a few participial phrases. At least they&#039;re not occurring in clusters so much, but they come with their own baggage. For one thing, they imply simultaneous action, so she drapes her coat over the chair at the same time that she turns to face him. That&#039;d more likely occur in sequence. Then adding the hitch is also implied to happen concurrently.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I-I’d love to, but,” she looked into his eyes and had to fight back the urge to swoon, “this is your performance//</span><br />Here&#039;s how to put a narrative aside in a quote:<br />“I-I’d love to, but—” she looked into his eyes and had to fight back the urge to swoon “—this is your performance<br />I see there are other instances of the same issue later on.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;split-second//</span><br />In that usage, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but this time, and an entirely new beat//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She turned her head and her eyes widened//</span><br />Put a comma between these clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;equipment in the far corner of the room. &#039;I’d expect to see that kind of equipment//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the stallion that//</span><br />The stallion is a &quot;who,&quot; not a &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He matched her at first before accelerating his steps, occasionally raising a hoof to accentuate his movements.//</span><br />This is all pretty vague.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she quickly picked up the cadence of his hooves as they tapped the stage floor and sped her own steps to match//</span><br />Stacked-up &quot;as&quot; clauses again, and more repetition of &quot;steps&quot; around here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Adrenaline, nerves, and sheer joy raced through her veins//</span><br />This isn&#039;t bad, but it&#039;d strengthen things if you focus on the symptoms, like what images are flashing through her mind and what physical sensations she has.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;perfectly-measured//</span><br />No hyphen is needed for two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She glanced to her side for a second, and smiled at the sight of the audience watching in rapt silence.//</span><br />The opposite issue, and the one I&#039;ve let slide numerous times because it felt right for the flow: that&#039;s all one clause, so you don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his eyes had seemingly never left her for a moment//</span><br />But the last time it was mentioned where he was looking, it explicitly said he wasn&#039;t looking at her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;for a moment, his stare not faltering for even a moment//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;His eyes, the entrancing rhythm, the dozens of eyes watching her//</span><br />Fairly repetitive mention of eyes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;split-second//</span><br />Same as before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bow - a//</span><br />Use a dash. Actually, a colon would work well here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her eyes seemed to glow brighter//</span><br />Again, you&#039;ve dropped into an outside perspective. This isn&#039;t something she would know. I think a limited narrator is probably the best choice for this story, and you&#039;re mostly using that. But these slips into an omniscient feel push me away from the character. Be careful to keep it all to what she could reasonably know, perceive, or pay attention to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;beautiful, silk//</span><br />These are hierarchical adjectives. You don&#039;t need a comma between them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tempo//</span><br />That&#039;s another word you&#039;re using an awful lot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;again, he was right beside her. She stared at him again//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- and more than a hint of desire -//</span><br />Use dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nor did their hooves stop tapping and stomping in perfect harmony//</span><br />See earlier comment about the use of &quot;harmony&quot; in this context.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- to live -//</span><br />Use dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;inside-out//</span><br />No hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the music rose toward its peak//</span><br />You just used &quot;peak&quot; to describe this in the last paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a careful observer may have seen sparks of red and green magic crackling across the floor//</span><br />Straying from her perspective again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She spun by him a final time as the last notes of the music played out, only now she spun right into his hooves.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in a seamless motion//</span><br />You just used &quot;seamless&quot; not long ago. There are plenty of other words that would work: unbroken, fluid, smooth, …<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and looked into her blazing green eyes//</span><br />Doesn&#039;t sound like her perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- and what might happen soon after that -//</span><br />Use dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as a sign of the crowd’s admiration for the performance they had just witnessed//</span><br />A completely redundant and unnecessary clarification.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She felt a touch on her leg and when she looked down, she saw his hoof wrapped gently around her own.//</span><br />Comma splice, but in her current emotional state, I could buy it as a product of her rushed thoughts.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;now disheveled//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;life.” He whispered//</span><br />I assume this is supposed to be an attribution, but it&#039;s not punctuated/capitalized like one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;resist - she//</span><br />Use a dash.<br /><br />In this last scene, the paragraph indentations get inconsistent.<br /><br />I must confess that I know a lot more about music than dance, so if you have a technical knowledge about flamenco, then I&#039;ll bow to your expertise. But if it&#039;s not something you&#039;re particularly informed about or haven&#039;t researched much, then there&#039;s a book I&#039;d like to refer you to. Rather, I&#039;d just send you the brief section about flamenco, but I&#039;m not going to spend the time typing it out if you don&#039;t need it. I think it could lend a little more technical accuracy, though I don&#039;t have the experience with dance to know if what the author says is true in general. He does research on music in culture and has a level of knowledge about music that I&#039;d place well above casual, but I don&#039;t know if the same is true for the dance aspect. Anyway, if you think it would help, I&#039;d gladly send it along to you. It&#039;s even a nice narrative about how to find the real thing that the locals appreciate, not the superficial one for the tourists.<br /><br />I have mixed feelings about the ending. We&#039;re built up over the entire story to be invested in Roseluck&#039;s feelings on the matter, but then she gets completely dropped. We can infer a little from the rose she left behind, but really, her arc never completes. Is she fulfilled now? Or is she going to pine away now that she&#039;s achieved her life&#039;s dream and has nothing left to wish for? The fact that we get the stallion&#039;s aftermath is nice, at least, but we were never particularly engaged with him, so it carries far less power.<br /><br />This was a good story. There&#039;s not much to fix here—just some easy mechanical and repetitive elements, and a few wavers in perspective. When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, use the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 340

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Groans of annoyance and disappointment erupted from the class.//

Avoid directly stating emotions like this. Get me to interpret their mood from what they do and how they look. For instance, instead of saying someone's happy, say they're smiling and hopping up and down. It's much more engaging that way. You do this quite a bit. The three biggest things to avoid are saying the emotion outright (happy), adverb form (sadly), and prepositional phrase form (in excitement).

>line-of-sight//

When used as a noun, you don't need the hyphens.

>She seemed to think on this for a bit//

This is a kind of telling, too. The narrator's drawing the conclusion for me. That said, you get some leeway with a first-person narrator, since they're less apt to explain the reasoning behind their conclusions, particularly with regard to their own actions. So you don't have to go overboard woth her, but I'd still encourage you to let me in on some of the evidence that makes her think make this judgment.

On a related note, the point of a first-person narration is to get the reader intimately in the character's head. So it's odd that your first scene is in a kind of subjective narration in the collective class's viewpoint. You couldn't have Derpy's perspective there, since she wasn't present for it, but you could have had Dinky tell her about it on the walk home instead and get at the information that way.

You're also getting very talking heads here. This is when we get a lot of dialogue with little to break it up that shows what the characters are doing as they talk. It causes the reader to lose sight of the setting and is too reliant on the dialogue alone to carry the emotional burden. Consider that half of a conversation is nonverbal. You're missing that half of it, and it adds a lot of characterization to see how they respond to what's said.

>The slight tickly feeling of my feathers against her back//

How does she know that's what it feels like?

>right in my front of my face//

Extraneous word.

>thanks Rose//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Flipping open the flap of the saddlebag, I rummaged through its contents//

Here, you're saying that she flips open the saddlebag at the same time she rummages through it. That'd more likely happen in series.

>where I stood awkwardly—peeking through the contents of Twilight’s bookshelves.//

I don't see the utility of a dash there. A comma would be fine.

>At first, he gave me a funny look upon showing him the book I wanted.//

That syntax is jumbled. It says he showed himself the book Derpy wanted.

>in such a manner, that no force//

Unnecessary comma.

>With this light—this shimmering, radiant light of undeniable and unspeakable glory—//

This type of structure, with these inserted parenthetical asides, gets very repetitive in this excerpt.

>rarely had leftovers, and on the rare//

Watch the repetition.

>the crux of the point//

Redundant.

>She gave me an indecisive look.//

See how often you just go ahead and identify their expressions for me? I have no idea what this looks like, so I can't envision the scene in my head. Inferring emotion from appearance and behavior is our natural way of perception, so it works so much better to have writing do it that way as well.

>her expression changed//

This couldn't be more vague.

>Nothing particularly interesting stood out about it. As one would expect from a typical encyclopedia or dictionary, it bore a very plain cover//

You've said the same thing twice, which you'd already said in the previous paragraph.

>large, iron//

Hierarchical adjectives. You don't need the comma.

>I almost considered this big hunk of metal to be the metaphorical equivalent of my soul//

That rather smacks of the author using the character as a mouthpiece. And then she never explains why.

>As I opened the door to the safe, I took a moment to gaze at my collection within; pages upon pages of journals—I had stopped counting at this point—stacked on top of one another, creating several layers from the back of the safe towards the front.//

Misused semicolon. The aside notwithstanding, there isn't an independent clause after it. This should be a colon.

> and finally began jotting them down//

This caught my eye, and probably only because you'd just used the same verb shortly before. I'd gotten the impression that you'd used it a lot, but when I checked by doing a search, you only use it 4 times. But then when I checked the related "start," I see that you used it 7 times. Even then, that's not a ton, but they're often not necessary. Every action begins. It's only worth calling attention to that beginning it it's an abrupt change or the action never finishes.

Maybe you get to these things later on, but I do have some disconnects with Derpy's situation. She's been keeping these journals for a long time, so nothing about the situation is new to her. She writes well, so if she feels bad that nobody knows how smart she is, why not do that? Twilight would no doubt be willing to accommodate her if it meant having to sit there with her for a long time to get out what she wanted to say. She could write letters, or if she wanted public exposure, do articles or editorials for the newspaper. It's not even mentioned whether she considered getting therapy. These are all easy answers that my mind immediately jumps to, and her journal entry is (oddly) generalized to her whole experience, not just what happened to her the day she wrote it, so why wouldn't she have covered these topics? By not even talking about such things, it's like they never occurred to her, which doesn't quite jive.

>state-of-mind//

No hyphens.

You've correctly un-italicized words for emphasis within the italicized entry, but really think about what that means. This is an article of writing, so that presumes that she writes these words differently somehow than the others, in print versus cursive, for example. But that's not the norm. If she's typing, sure, but I assume it's manuscript. So what do you do when writing something by hand to emphasize it? You'd underline it, use all capitals, or write over it several times to get it dark (essentially bold face).

So to add a summary to that, just watch the amount of repetition and telling. Those were the only consistent problems. However, I would like to caution you about something in the extended synopsis you included in your submission. Specifically, chapter 6. This really sounds like it's going to be on the wrong side of what we call "piling on," which is shoveling more and more tragedy upon our poor protagonist. Doing so is a blatant play for the reader's heartstrings, and those that see through it often resent the author for it. Where sad/tragedy are concerned, less is more. There's no reason to put more in there than is required for the plot to work. There are too many stories that do this to a ridiculous degree, and we regularly reject them for it.

Incidentally, I agree with one of the commenters that it took me a little while to catch on that she'd been reading her novel for hours. I wouldn't have gotten that sense at all unless you'd explicitly stated it, and I think there are more elegant ways to go about that. For one, say it indirectly by having her note that the sun has moved quite far or something. That's still fairly terse, but less overt. Or have breaks in the reading, bridged by ellipses, so we see things getting skipped, maybe have her do a few things like get a drink that would clearly be spaced out. Just a thought.

Now, this story's skillfully written enough that I'm tempted to give it a conditional rejection, though really that wouldn't make a difference in this case. It'd be more of a reminder to myself whether I needed to reread the whole thing or just spot-check it. In any case, I'm going to ask that you have a few more chapters written before resubmitting. I can see from the extended synopsis where you intend to take the story, but for one thing, that could change, and for another, actually getting those done is entirely a different matter than planning them. So far, while well written, we have a very standard setup, of Derpy being a misunderstood outcast and Dinky as the one who knows the real her while being ashamed, secretive, and/or evasive about her with other ponies. Even the conceit that it turns out Derpy's really smart has been done multiple times, so what I really want to see is what makes this story different from those. And certainly being better written is something that can stand out, and you've already got a leg up there, but I'd like something more than "it's story X, but better" to justify posting it. If you think your next couple of chapters fit the bill, then that won't be any more work for you.

So, bottom line, I'd like to see this back with the repetition and telliness fixed, and with some more meat to it so I can make sure there's a unique story being told. I'm not going to make you wait until chapter 6 to see if that gets done well, but do take that advice to heart, because it's the difference between cheap feels and a really powerful story. We see people on the wrong side of that equation all the time.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Groans of annoyance and disappointment erupted from the class.//</span><br />Avoid directly stating emotions like this. Get me to interpret their mood from what they do and how they look. For instance, instead of saying someone&#039;s happy, say they&#039;re smiling and hopping up and down. It&#039;s much more engaging that way. You do this quite a bit. The three biggest things to avoid are saying the emotion outright (happy), adverb form (sadly), and prepositional phrase form (in excitement).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;line-of-sight//</span><br />When used as a noun, you don&#039;t need the hyphens.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She seemed to think on this for a bit//</span><br />This is a kind of telling, too. The narrator&#039;s drawing the conclusion for me. That said, you get some leeway with a first-person narrator, since they&#039;re less apt to explain the reasoning behind their conclusions, particularly with regard to their own actions. So you don&#039;t have to go overboard woth her, but I&#039;d still encourage you to let me in on some of the evidence that makes her think make this judgment. <br /><br />On a related note, the point of a first-person narration is to get the reader intimately in the character&#039;s head. So it&#039;s odd that your first scene is in a kind of subjective narration in the collective class&#039;s viewpoint. You couldn&#039;t have Derpy&#039;s perspective there, since she wasn&#039;t present for it, but you could have had Dinky tell her about it on the walk home instead and get at the information that way.<br /><br />You&#039;re also getting very talking heads here. This is when we get a lot of dialogue with little to break it up that shows what the characters are doing as they talk. It causes the reader to lose sight of the setting and is too reliant on the dialogue alone to carry the emotional burden. Consider that half of a conversation is nonverbal. You&#039;re missing that half of it, and it adds a lot of characterization to see how they respond to what&#039;s said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The slight tickly feeling of my feathers against her back//</span><br />How does she know that&#039;s what it feels like?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;right in my front of my face//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thanks Rose//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Flipping open the flap of the saddlebag, I rummaged through its contents//</span><br />Here, you&#039;re saying that she flips open the saddlebag at the same time she rummages through it. That&#039;d more likely happen in series.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;where I stood awkwardly—peeking through the contents of Twilight’s bookshelves.//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the utility of a dash there. A comma would be fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At first, he gave me a funny look upon showing him the book I wanted.//</span><br />That syntax is jumbled. It says he showed himself the book Derpy wanted.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in such a manner, that no force//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With this light—this shimmering, radiant light of undeniable and unspeakable glory—//</span><br />This type of structure, with these inserted parenthetical asides, gets very repetitive in this excerpt.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rarely had leftovers, and on the rare//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the crux of the point//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She gave me an indecisive look.//</span><br />See how often you just go ahead and identify their expressions for me? I have no idea what this looks like, so I can&#039;t envision the scene in my head. Inferring emotion from appearance and behavior is our natural way of perception, so it works so much better to have writing do it that way as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her expression changed//</span><br />This couldn&#039;t be more vague.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nothing particularly interesting stood out about it. As one would expect from a typical encyclopedia or dictionary, it bore a very plain cover//</span><br />You&#039;ve said the same thing twice, which you&#039;d already said in the previous paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;large, iron//</span><br />Hierarchical adjectives. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I almost considered this big hunk of metal to be the metaphorical equivalent of my soul//</span><br />That rather smacks of the author using the character as a mouthpiece. And then she never explains why.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As I opened the door to the safe, I took a moment to gaze at my collection within; pages upon pages of journals—I had stopped counting at this point—stacked on top of one another, creating several layers from the back of the safe towards the front.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. The aside notwithstanding, there isn&#039;t an independent clause after it. This should be a colon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; and finally began jotting them down//</span><br />This caught my eye, and probably only because you&#039;d just used the same verb shortly before. I&#039;d gotten the impression that you&#039;d used it a lot, but when I checked by doing a search, you only use it 4 times. But then when I checked the related &quot;start,&quot; I see that you used it 7 times. Even then, that&#039;s not a ton, but they&#039;re often not necessary. Every action begins. It&#039;s only worth calling attention to that beginning it it&#039;s an abrupt change or the action never finishes.<br /><br />Maybe you get to these things later on, but I do have some disconnects with Derpy&#039;s situation. She&#039;s been keeping these journals for a long time, so nothing about the situation is new to her. She writes well, so if she feels bad that nobody knows how smart she is, why not do that? Twilight would no doubt be willing to accommodate her if it meant having to sit there with her for a long time to get out what she wanted to say. She could write letters, or if she wanted public exposure, do articles or editorials for the newspaper. It&#039;s not even mentioned whether she considered getting therapy. These are all easy answers that my mind immediately jumps to, and her journal entry is (oddly) generalized to her whole experience, not just what happened to her the day she wrote it, so why wouldn&#039;t she have covered these topics? By not even talking about such things, it&#039;s like they never occurred to her, which doesn&#039;t quite jive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;state-of-mind//</span><br />No hyphens.<br /><br />You&#039;ve correctly un-italicized words for emphasis within the italicized entry, but really think about what that means. This is an article of writing, so that presumes that she writes these words differently somehow than the others, in print versus cursive, for example. But that&#039;s not the norm. If she&#039;s typing, sure, but I assume it&#039;s manuscript. So what do you do when writing something by hand to emphasize it? You&#039;d underline it, use all capitals, or write over it several times to get it dark (essentially bold face).<br /><br />So to add a summary to that, just watch the amount of repetition and telling. Those were the only consistent problems. However, I would like to caution you about something in the extended synopsis you included in your submission. Specifically, chapter 6. This really sounds like it&#039;s going to be on the wrong side of what we call &quot;piling on,&quot; which is shoveling more and more tragedy upon our poor protagonist. Doing so is a blatant play for the reader&#039;s heartstrings, and those that see through it often resent the author for it. Where sad/tragedy are concerned, less is more. There&#039;s no reason to put more in there than is required for the plot to work. There are too many stories that do this to a ridiculous degree, and we regularly reject them for it.<br /><br />Incidentally, I agree with one of the commenters that it took me a little while to catch on that she&#039;d been reading her novel for hours. I wouldn&#039;t have gotten that sense at all unless you&#039;d explicitly stated it, and I think there are more elegant ways to go about that. For one, say it indirectly by having her note that the sun has moved quite far or something. That&#039;s still fairly terse, but less overt. Or have breaks in the reading, bridged by ellipses, so we see things getting skipped, maybe have her do a few things like get a drink that would clearly be spaced out. Just a thought.<br /><br />Now, this story&#039;s skillfully written enough that I&#039;m tempted to give it a conditional rejection, though really that wouldn&#039;t make a difference in this case. It&#039;d be more of a reminder to myself whether I needed to reread the whole thing or just spot-check it. In any case, I&#039;m going to ask that you have a few more chapters written before resubmitting. I can see from the extended synopsis where you intend to take the story, but for one thing, that could change, and for another, actually getting those done is entirely a different matter than planning them. So far, while well written, we have a very standard setup, of Derpy being a misunderstood outcast and Dinky as the one who knows the real her while being ashamed, secretive, and/or evasive about her with other ponies. Even the conceit that it turns out Derpy&#039;s really smart has been done multiple times, so what I really want to see is what makes this story different from those. And certainly being better written is something that can stand out, and you&#039;ve already got a leg up there, but I&#039;d like something more than &quot;it&#039;s story X, but better&quot; to justify posting it. If you think your next couple of chapters fit the bill, then that won&#039;t be any more work for you.<br /><br />So, bottom line, I&#039;d like to see this back with the repetition and telliness fixed, and with some more meat to it so I can make sure there&#039;s a unique story being told. I&#039;m not going to make you wait until chapter 6 to see if that gets done well, but do take that advice to heart, because it&#039;s the difference between cheap feels and a really powerful story. We see people on the wrong side of that equation all the time.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 341

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'll just say right off the bat that I'm not going to mark many detailed mechanical errors in the letters themselves, as they may be attributable to the characters, insofar as it fits their personalities to make such mistakes.

>if you’re busy with important!//

Missing word.

>I got a sort-of promotion at work!//

There's a bit of exclamation point overload going on here. They make things stand outm but when everything stands out, nothing does.

>I just worry about you now I’m not around to tell you these things in person.//

Missing a "that" in there.

>'thunk'//

Sounds effects are generally discouraged in narration, but it's a valid word anyway, so you don't need the quotes.

>She always felt more positive when she got a letter or sent one back.//

Instead of being so blunt, give me some more detail. What effect is this positivity having on her thoughts or how she feels physically?

>The Minuette’s//

Not sure what that "The" is supposed to indicate.

>outer wear//

outerwear

>The world lay under a thick white blanket outside but the heaters in the little shop were on full blast//

There are two separate clauses here, so put a comma between them. There's an explanation at the top of this thread, under "comma use with conjunctions."

>Suspiciously//

How does this look? Create a visual in my head so that I can read their emotions from what I see. This type of telly language comes at it backward; it gives me the conclusion, then burdens me with creating the mental picture to fit.

>I’m just teaching my first student today and I wanted to make sure everything’s all set.//

Same deal with the comma/clauses thing.

>Why wouldn’t it be?//

What does "it" refer to here? You sure you didn't mean "I"?

>Minuette didn’t quite leap backwards but it was close.//

Needs a comma.

>Minuette shove her hoof away.//

Verb tense.

>She tried to look dignified but Lyra’s continued onslaught of booping made her telekinetically lift her paperwork and bat at the hooves that wouldn’t leave her alone.//

Needs a comma.

>flat of an unturned flat//

Watch the repetition. Also note how there's pretty sparse narration through much of this dialogue. The rationale behind this is described in the section on talking heads up top, but the short of it is that you don't want the reader losing sight of the visual setting, and the nonverbal part of a conversation supplements the emotions quite a bit.

>Her grin faded, the bright gusto of her mood temporarily dampening.//

The fading grin already connotes the rest and does so subtly.

>boring!//

You'll normally italicize an ! or ? that's on an italicized word.

>Concern laced her words//

I hope I've pointed out enough of these by now that they'll be easy to spot. If you see an emotion directly named, chances are the scene would be more powerful by giving me the evidence to lead me there instead.

>Gone was the edge of laughter from his voice. Gone, too, was the jovial gleam from his eyes. His shoulders slumped as if weighed down by a heavy invisible poncho.//

There you go. This is how to do it right. You say what his mood is without saying it.

>siuded//

Not sure what this was supposed to be. Maybe "sounded"? If so, watch the perspective. Anything in this scene so far that favored a perspective character sat squarely with Minuette, but this is external to her—she wouldn't be remarking about how she sounds. By the next paragraph, the perspective resides with her again. Try to keep that consistent.

>Forcibly ignoring how her heart jittered when he said her – the one she only ever allowed him to use//

Feels like a word missing, maybe "nickname". It's possible that she avoids using it, but I can't see why.

>Hearts n’ Hooves//

Grab that apostrophe and put another in front of the "n" as well. And I do mean cut and paste—if you type one at the beginning of a word, smart quotes will draw it backward.

>I yelled so loud you looked directly at me//

Seems an odd thing for her to say, since she doesn't attribute any motivation to it. Maybe something like "you had no choice but to notice, if only to shut me up."

>weekend to Horseshoe Bay//

Maybe this is a British thing? I've always heard that phrased with an "in," not a "to."

I will pause for a moment here to say you've done a good job on the letters. Many writers don't actually consider what's reasonable to put in a letter. They essentially treat it as narration and give things like setting description and quoted dialogue that people simply wouldn't write in one. Yours sound natural.

>Rarity, that is; not Derpy//

>I don’t think Derpy could screech even if she tried. I miss everything about Ponyville; even the stuff I said was annoying or tiresome while I was there.//
Misused semicolons. Despite what I said earlier about being able to attribute errors to the writers themselves and not the author, attempting to use semicolons at all in something as informal as a personal letter would suggest a good enough familiarity to use them correctly.

>I’ve been looking forward to our Lesson//

Why is that capitalized?

>Wha-//

Use a full dash.

>steamrollering//

steamrolling

>Sweetie Belle was startled at the mare’s incisiveness.//

In this scene so far, the narrator had been speaking from Sweetie Belle's perspective and essentially using her own voice. But that feeling gets broken here, as this statement comes from a viewpoint external to her. Let the narration communicate her surprise how she experiences it. The narrator can comment for her, get a little tongue-tied, whatever.

>and I’ll point and laugh and call them a liar//

Needs a comma to set off this clause.

>She paused.//

For some reason, writers love this sentence, but it's incredibly vague and bland. What happens during the pause. Do thy both stand stock-still? Does one of them do something? Does your perspective character notice anything, or have an internal comment?

>Something inside Sweetie Belle tautened.//

But she doesn't know what? No reason has been presented as to why she'd repress it or keep it secret, so why wouldn't the narrator know?

>Her flank seemed to ache//

Insofar as she is the narrator, either it aches or it doesn't. "Seem" shouldn't enter into it.

>She just has to look at a piece of fabric and she knows how to make it into something beautiful.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Her voice rose in pitch.//

The scene started with a conversational tone well in Sweetie Belle's perspective, but now that the emotion is running high, you're backing away and sounding more omniscient. If you want to have a limited narrator at all, these are the types of moments to make it stand out.

>laughing stock//

laughingstock

>Lyra adopted a thoughtful expression.//

How does this look? Don't make me do the work. Look at it versus the next one:
>Sweetie Belle sniffed and stared at her.//
Here, you create the visual and let it do the work. I get her mood, even though you didn't say a single word about it directly.

>Sweetie Belle said desperately//

Again, let the limited narration and the visual of the scene carry the emotion. Don't put it all in a single "desperately" that's easy for the reader to gloss over without thinking about it. By making him decipher it (but also doing so rather unambiguously), you involve the reader much more.

>“Baloney!”//

Look how little narration we're getting the further this scene goes along. Don't lose sight of the visual aspect of the story. You have to keep the reader connected with these characters as actual events happen, and during a real conversation, an observer would notice little elements of how the conversants act and look.

>She paused.//

There you go again.

>after lesson than before them//

I think you meant "lesson" to be plural.

>With lots of freak-outs, no doubt.//

I don't see the advantage of putting this in italics. It's already apparent from the few sentences in this scene that you're taking a limited narration with Minuette, so the narrator already speaks her thoughts for her. There are times it's important to have the character speak the thought herself rather than let the narrator, but I don't see the need here. For example, compare to the later:
>Had Lyra gone already?//
They both have the same voicing, but why is it important that one thought happened verbatim, while the other may have been more of an impression?

>she decided to check it was neat and tidy enough for her exacting standards//

Feels like there's a missing "if" or "that" in there.

>Surely not; she would have seen her.//

Another misused semicolon. Basically, if you can't split it into two complete sentences at the semicolon, then use something else. A period, comma, colon, or dash may work, depending on the situation.

>She stared at needle//

Missing word.

>Annoyance frosted her tone.//

Too blunt, and it's a rather external perspective to her again. It doesn't sound like the kind of observation she'd make about herself, and she's effectively the narrator.

>My student arrives in twenty minutes and I need to get ready.//

Needs a comma.

>Lyra shook her head like she was trying to clear it.//

Watch the close repetition. You just used "clear" a couple sentences ago.

>She pursed her lips and made kissing noises.//

You sure you didn't mean "puckered"? It'd be hard to do that with pursed lips.

>The noise that emerged from Minutte’s throat could reasonably be called a squawk.//

Now you've gone to a more omniscient viewpoint, or possibly to Lyra's. Keep the perspective consistent.

>as she was chased//

This is a very active thing, but the passive voice robs it of its action.

>if you didn’t have a cart//

Try to avoid addressing the reader, unless you're going to make a habit of it (which should have been established by now anyway). "Without a cart" would work fine here.

>It scraped a few hairs, pulling them out by their roots.//

No reaction from her? Didn't it hurt?

>“You did –” Lyra blinked as she took in the multi-coloured mane and tail before her. “ –not!//

When putting a narrative aside in a quote like this, you don't need to capitalize the aside (except for an instance like this, where "Lyra" has to be capitalized anyway), and you only include end punctuation if it's a question mark or exclamation mark.

>You couldn’t buy dew soup or other pegasi delicacies//

Addressing the reader again. And noun adjuncts are singular, so "pegasus delicacies."

>She didn’t get angry easily but a sliver of irritation shot through her now.//

Needs a comma, and describe that irritation without saying that's what it is.

>asa//

Missing a space.

>Lyra place the meal triumphantly in her basket.//

Verb tense. And let the narration carry her mood. Wouldn't she be internally declaring herself the winner?

>in alarm//

In most instances, you can just remove these prepositional phrases that identify mood without altering anything, since the language is usually already in place to convey it. And in this case, it is.

>Hi Lyra!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>in delight//

Show me her delight instead of saying it.

>and very cold packet of frozen peas//

Missing a word.

>I keep trying but my magic isn’t good enough yet.//

Needs a comma.

>blew mane from her eyes//

Missing a "her" maybe?

>though her expression belied her words//

And what expression might that be?

>Lyra felt a little guilty for that.//

Be a little more subtle about this.

>She didn’t want Rainbow Dash to do herself any permanent damage but she had needed an excuse to get away from them.//

Needs a comma.

>uncomprehendingly//

Just have her raise an eyebrow or something. Or you could just drop this altogether. It's apparent from what she says anyway.

>usin’ you brain//

Typo.

>Applejack admitted, anger still tightening her words like a noose.//

This conversation is getting pretty talking heads. And it's a bit iffy to identify her anger directly like this. You already did it once, and you're calling attention to that fact. Just have her words tighten. You don't need to identify the anger. Some body language would sell it better.

>alarm blurring her words//

You don't need this. There's enough there already to pick it up.

>I haven’t even ordered one pizza since I you left//

Extraneous word.

>in surprise//

Drop it or elaborate with some subjective comment.

>Hi Lyra. Hi Sweetie Belle.//

Commas for direct address.

>obviously cheered//

If it's obvious, why don't I get to see it?

>She wants to go out and play with her friends but you can never be too careful with these things.//

Needs a comma.

>Bye Miss Hooves!//

Comma for direct address.

>After the irrepressible pink pony came to work for them it had been difficult not to smile.//

>They wanted a slice of happiness with their sweets and Pinkie was more than happy to serve it to them.//
Needs a comma.

>looking angry//

And how does that look?

>Mrs. Cake liked the polite filly//

No explanation is given to whether she likes her for the current circumstances or in general. And if that latter, it's an odd thing to point out, as it doesn't have much bearing on things, unless you want to supply some sort of anecdote running through Mrs. Cake's mind that does.

>uncomprehendingly//

That word again.

>No, that’s crass//

Again, given that you've chosen a subjective narrator in Mrs. Cake's perspective, I don't see the advantage of presenting this as quoted thought.

>You two just find yourselves a table and I’ll bring your milkshakes over//

Needs a comma.

>why she had such a sense of relief that they were no longer at the counter//

I don't get why she wouldn't know this. She practically explained it already.

>interest buzzing behind her eyes//

I have no idea what this would look like.

>of relief//

Unnecessary.

>A, now there’s a story.//

"Ah," yes?

>seemed honestly impressed//

What's her evidence of this conclusion? It also seems to imply that Lyra expected her not to care, and I'm not sure why, unless some generic thing that kids don't care about technical things or old stories.

>It was bad luck for her but it changed my life.//

Needs a comma.

>She twisted up her face at an unpleasant memory.//

Keep the narration feeling subjective. This sounds more omniscient.

>Sweetie Belle’s grimace matched Lyra’s perfectly.//

There you go. This is a great sentence, because it gets at both their moods without overtly stating them, and the "perfectly" is a subjective judgment, which places it firmly in Lyra's perspective.

>and that when he was in school//

Needs a comma after this.

>So why was Rarity the one to arrange Sweetie Belle’s singing lessons? she wondered.//

Another case where I don't see what it gains you to present as a direct thought.

>Hoofington Conservatoire//

Seems odd that a British-sounding town would choose the French version of Conservatory.

>respondent sympathy//

You just used "sympathy" a couple sentences ago.

>Lyra trailed off.//

I already get that from the punctuation. You don't need to narrate it.

>It used to but it didn’t anymore.//

Needs a comma.

>hairsbreadth//

hair's breadth.

>High school was awful for those who didn’t fit in but she suspected Sweetie Belle was destined to be one of the pretty fillies//

Needs a comma.

>ice-cream//

Is it a British-ism to hyphenate that?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />I&#039;ll just say right off the bat that I&#039;m not going to mark many detailed mechanical errors in the letters themselves, as they may be attributable to the characters, insofar as it fits their personalities to make such mistakes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if you’re busy with important!//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I got a sort-of promotion at work!//</span><br />There&#039;s a bit of exclamation point overload going on here. They make things stand outm but when everything stands out, nothing does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I just worry about you now I’m not around to tell you these things in person.//</span><br />Missing a &quot;that&quot; in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&#039;thunk&#039;//</span><br />Sounds effects are generally discouraged in narration, but it&#039;s a valid word anyway, so you don&#039;t need the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She always felt more positive when she got a letter or sent one back.//</span><br />Instead of being so blunt, give me some more detail. What effect is this positivity having on her thoughts or how she feels physically?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Minuette’s//</span><br />Not sure what that &quot;The&quot; is supposed to indicate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;outer wear//</span><br />outerwear<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The world lay under a thick white blanket outside but the heaters in the little shop were on full blast//</span><br />There are two separate clauses here, so put a comma between them. There&#039;s an explanation at the top of this thread, under &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Suspiciously//</span><br />How does this look? Create a visual in my head so that I can read their emotions from what I see. This type of telly language comes at it backward; it gives me the conclusion, then burdens me with creating the mental picture to fit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m just teaching my first student today and I wanted to make sure everything’s all set.//</span><br />Same deal with the comma/clauses thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why wouldn’t it be?//</span><br />What does &quot;it&quot; refer to here? You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;I&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Minuette didn’t quite leap backwards but it was close.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Minuette shove her hoof away.//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She tried to look dignified but Lyra’s continued onslaught of booping made her telekinetically lift her paperwork and bat at the hooves that wouldn’t leave her alone.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;flat of an unturned flat//</span><br />Watch the repetition. Also note how there&#039;s pretty sparse narration through much of this dialogue. The rationale behind this is described in the section on talking heads up top, but the short of it is that you don&#039;t want the reader losing sight of the visual setting, and the nonverbal part of a conversation supplements the emotions quite a bit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her grin faded, the bright gusto of her mood temporarily dampening.//</span><br />The fading grin already connotes the rest and does so subtly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>boring</i>!//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally italicize an ! or ? that&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Concern laced her words//</span><br />I hope I&#039;ve pointed out enough of these by now that they&#039;ll be easy to spot. If you see an emotion directly named, chances are the scene would be more powerful by giving me the evidence to lead me there instead.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gone was the edge of laughter from his voice. Gone, too, was the jovial gleam from his eyes. His shoulders slumped as if weighed down by a heavy invisible poncho.//</span><br />There you go. This is how to do it right. You say what his mood is without saying it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;siuded//</span><br />Not sure what this was supposed to be. Maybe &quot;sounded&quot;? If so, watch the perspective. Anything in this scene so far that favored a perspective character sat squarely with Minuette, but this is external to her—she wouldn&#039;t be remarking about how she sounds. By the next paragraph, the perspective resides with her again. Try to keep that consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Forcibly ignoring how her heart jittered when he said her – the one she only ever allowed him to use//</span><br />Feels like a word missing, maybe &quot;nickname&quot;. It&#039;s possible that she avoids using it, but I can&#039;t see why.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hearts n’ Hooves//</span><br />Grab that apostrophe and put another in front of the &quot;n&quot; as well. And I do mean cut and paste—if you type one at the beginning of a word, smart quotes will draw it backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I yelled so loud you looked directly at me//</span><br />Seems an odd thing for her to say, since she doesn&#039;t attribute any motivation to it. Maybe something like &quot;you had no choice but to notice, if only to shut me up.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;weekend to Horseshoe Bay//</span><br />Maybe this is a British thing? I&#039;ve always heard that phrased with an &quot;in,&quot; not a &quot;to.&quot;<br /><br />I will pause for a moment here to say you&#039;ve done a good job on the letters. Many writers don&#039;t actually consider what&#039;s reasonable to put in a letter. They essentially treat it as narration and give things like setting description and quoted dialogue that people simply wouldn&#039;t write in one. Yours sound natural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity, that is; not Derpy//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t think Derpy could screech even if she tried. I miss everything about Ponyville; even the stuff I said was annoying or tiresome while I was there.//</span><br />Misused semicolons. Despite what I said earlier about being able to attribute errors to the writers themselves and not the author, attempting to use semicolons at all in something as informal as a personal letter would suggest a good enough familiarity to use them correctly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve been looking forward to our Lesson//</span><br />Why is that capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Wha-//</span><br />Use a full dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;steamrollering//</span><br />steamrolling<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle was startled at the mare’s incisiveness.//</span><br />In this scene so far, the narrator had been speaking from Sweetie Belle&#039;s perspective and essentially using her own voice. But that feeling gets broken here, as this statement comes from a viewpoint external to her. Let the narration communicate her surprise how she experiences it. The narrator can comment for her, get a little tongue-tied, whatever.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and I’ll point and laugh and call them a liar//</span><br />Needs a comma to set off this clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She paused.//</span><br />For some reason, writers love this sentence, but it&#039;s incredibly vague and bland. What happens during the pause. Do thy both stand stock-still? Does one of them do something? Does your perspective character notice anything, or have an internal comment?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Something inside Sweetie Belle tautened.//</span><br />But she doesn&#039;t know what? No reason has been presented as to why she&#039;d repress it or keep it secret, so why wouldn&#039;t the narrator know?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her flank seemed to ache//</span><br />Insofar as she is the narrator, either it aches or it doesn&#039;t. &quot;Seem&quot; shouldn&#039;t enter into it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She just has to look at a piece of fabric and she knows how to make it into something beautiful.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her voice rose in pitch.//</span><br />The scene started with a conversational tone well in Sweetie Belle&#039;s perspective, but now that the emotion is running high, you&#039;re backing away and sounding more omniscient. If you want to have a limited narrator at all, these are the types of moments to make it stand out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;laughing stock//</span><br />laughingstock<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra adopted a thoughtful expression.//</span><br />How does this look? Don&#039;t make me do the work. Look at it versus the next one:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle sniffed and stared at her.//</span><br />Here, you create the visual and let it do the work. I get her mood, even though you didn&#039;t say a single word about it directly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle said desperately//</span><br />Again, let the limited narration and the visual of the scene carry the emotion. Don&#039;t put it all in a single &quot;desperately&quot; that&#039;s easy for the reader to gloss over without thinking about it. By making him decipher it (but also doing so rather unambiguously), you involve the reader much more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Baloney!”//</span><br />Look how little narration we&#039;re getting the further this scene goes along. Don&#039;t lose sight of the visual aspect of the story. You have to keep the reader connected with these characters as actual events happen, and during a real conversation, an observer would notice little elements of how the conversants act and look.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She paused.//</span><br />There you go again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after lesson than before them//</span><br />I think you meant &quot;lesson&quot; to be plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With lots of freak-outs, no doubt.//</span><br />I don&#039;t see the advantage of putting this in italics. It&#039;s already apparent from the few sentences in this scene that you&#039;re taking a limited narration with Minuette, so the narrator already speaks her thoughts for her. There are times it&#039;s important to have the character speak the thought herself rather than let the narrator, but I don&#039;t see the need here. For example, compare to the later:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Had Lyra gone already?//</span><br />They both have the same voicing, but why is it important that one thought happened verbatim, while the other may have been more of an impression?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she decided to check it was neat and tidy enough for her exacting standards//</span><br />Feels like there&#039;s a missing &quot;if&quot; or &quot;that&quot; in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Surely not; she would have seen her.//</span><br />Another misused semicolon. Basically, if you can&#039;t split it into two complete sentences at the semicolon, then use something else. A period, comma, colon, or dash may work, depending on the situation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She stared at needle//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Annoyance frosted her tone.//</span><br />Too blunt, and it&#039;s a rather external perspective to her again. It doesn&#039;t sound like the kind of observation she&#039;d make about herself, and she&#039;s effectively the narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My student arrives in twenty minutes and I need to get ready.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra shook her head like she was trying to clear it.//</span><br />Watch the close repetition. You just used &quot;clear&quot; a couple sentences ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She pursed her lips and made kissing noises.//</span><br />You sure you didn&#039;t mean &quot;puckered&quot;? It&#039;d be hard to do that with pursed lips.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The noise that emerged from Minutte’s throat could reasonably be called a squawk.//</span><br />Now you&#039;ve gone to a more omniscient viewpoint, or possibly to Lyra&#039;s. Keep the perspective consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she was chased//</span><br />This is a very active thing, but the passive voice robs it of its action.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;if you didn’t have a cart//</span><br />Try to avoid addressing the reader, unless you&#039;re going to make a habit of it (which should have been established by now anyway). &quot;Without a cart&quot; would work fine here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It scraped a few hairs, pulling them out by their roots.//</span><br />No reaction from her? Didn&#039;t it hurt?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“You did –” Lyra blinked as she took in the multi-coloured mane and tail before her. “ –not!//</span><br />When putting a narrative aside in a quote like this, you don&#039;t need to capitalize the aside (except for an instance like this, where &quot;Lyra&quot; has to be capitalized anyway), and you only include end punctuation if it&#039;s a question mark or exclamation mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You couldn’t buy dew soup or other pegasi delicacies//</span><br />Addressing the reader again. And noun adjuncts are singular, so &quot;pegasus delicacies.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t get angry easily but a sliver of irritation shot through her now.//</span><br />Needs a comma, and describe that irritation without saying that&#039;s what it is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;asa//</span><br />Missing a space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra place the meal triumphantly in her basket.//</span><br />Verb tense. And let the narration carry her mood. Wouldn&#039;t she be internally declaring herself the winner?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in alarm//</span><br />In most instances, you can just remove these prepositional phrases that identify mood without altering anything, since the language is usually already in place to convey it. And in this case, it is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hi Lyra!//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in delight//</span><br />Show me her delight instead of saying it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and very cold packet of frozen peas//</span><br />Missing a word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I keep trying but my magic isn’t good enough yet.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blew mane from her eyes//</span><br />Missing a &quot;her&quot; maybe?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;though her expression belied her words//</span><br />And what expression might that be?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra felt a little guilty for that.//</span><br />Be a little more subtle about this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t want Rainbow Dash to do herself any permanent damage but she had needed an excuse to get away from them.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;uncomprehendingly//</span><br />Just have her raise an eyebrow or something. Or you could just drop this altogether. It&#039;s apparent from what she says anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;usin’ you brain//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack admitted, anger still tightening her words like a noose.//</span><br />This conversation is getting pretty talking heads. And it&#039;s a bit iffy to identify her anger directly like this. You already did it once, and you&#039;re calling attention to that fact. Just have her words tighten. You don&#039;t need to identify the anger. Some body language would sell it better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;alarm blurring her words//</span><br />You don&#039;t need this. There&#039;s enough there already to pick it up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I haven’t even ordered one pizza since I you left//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in surprise//</span><br />Drop it or elaborate with some subjective comment.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hi Lyra. Hi Sweetie Belle.//</span><br />Commas for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;obviously cheered//</span><br />If it&#039;s obvious, why don&#039;t I get to see it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She wants to go out and play with her friends but you can never be too careful with these things.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Bye Miss Hooves!//</span><br />Comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After the irrepressible pink pony came to work for them it had been difficult not to smile.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They wanted a slice of happiness with their sweets and Pinkie was more than happy to serve it to them.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking angry//</span><br />And how does that look?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mrs. Cake liked the polite filly//</span><br />No explanation is given to whether she likes her for the current circumstances or in general. And if that latter, it&#039;s an odd thing to point out, as it doesn&#039;t have much bearing on things, unless you want to supply some sort of anecdote running through Mrs. Cake&#039;s mind that does.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;uncomprehendingly//</span><br />That word again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No, that’s crass//</span><br />Again, given that you&#039;ve chosen a subjective narrator in Mrs. Cake&#039;s perspective, I don&#039;t see the advantage of presenting this as quoted thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You two just find yourselves a table and I’ll bring your milkshakes over//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;why she had such a sense of relief that they were no longer at the counter//</span><br />I don&#039;t get why she wouldn&#039;t know this. She practically explained it already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;interest buzzing behind her eyes//</span><br />I have no idea what this would look like.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;of relief//</span><br />Unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A, now there’s a story.//</span><br />&quot;Ah,&quot; yes?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;seemed honestly impressed//</span><br />What&#039;s her evidence of this conclusion? It also seems to imply that Lyra expected her not to care, and I&#039;m not sure why, unless some generic thing that kids don&#039;t care about technical things or old stories.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was bad luck for her but it changed my life.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She twisted up her face at an unpleasant memory.//</span><br />Keep the narration feeling subjective. This sounds more omniscient.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle’s grimace matched Lyra’s perfectly.//</span><br />There you go. This is a great sentence, because it gets at both their moods without overtly stating them, and the &quot;perfectly&quot; is a subjective judgment, which places it firmly in Lyra&#039;s perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and that when he was in school//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So why was Rarity the one to arrange Sweetie Belle’s singing lessons? she wondered.//</span><br />Another case where I don&#039;t see what it gains you to present as a direct thought.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hoofington Conservatoire//</span><br />Seems odd that a British-sounding town would choose the French version of Conservatory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;respondent sympathy//</span><br />You just used &quot;sympathy&quot; a couple sentences ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra trailed off.//</span><br />I already get that from the punctuation. You don&#039;t need to narrate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It used to but it didn’t anymore.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hairsbreadth//</span><br />hair&#039;s breadth.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;High school was awful for those who didn’t fit in but she suspected Sweetie Belle was destined to be one of the pretty fillies//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ice-cream//</span><br />Is it a British-ism to hyphenate that?<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 342

>in terror//
Show it in her face, not the narration.

>But sip is slow anyhow.//

Typo.

>Eventually she stopped looking like she was about to cry and Lyra released her magic.//

Needs a comma.

>Sweetie Bell//

Typo. Do a search for these, as I noticed more than one.

>great-aunts//

Another one. Do Brits normally hyphenate compound nouns like this?

>A feeling went up her spine; not a shiver but something else, like the tip of a hoof running over each vertebra without actually touching them.//

Misused semicolon.

>Your sister doesn’t seem to like me much so I wondered whether she’d approve of you hanging out with me.//

Needs a comma.

>ag-.//

Use a real dash, and the period is extraneous.

>Discomfort showed clearly in Sweetie Belle’s expression.//

How so?

>How weird is –“//

Another thing that can break smart quotes is dashes. These are backward.

>Hi Pinkie!//

Needs a comma.

>present the first two like a medieval pony presenting//

Watch the repetition.

>At first she had thought Lyra was asleep but that had not been the case.//

Needs a comma.

>middle of tutoring session//

Missing word.

>last Winter//

Why is that capitalized?

>And she needs six more of them so I’m afraid I require your modelling services for a while longer, darling.//

Needs a comma.

>I’m already late but I didn’t like to say//

Needs a comma.

>B-But//

Only capitalize the first one.

>When Fluttershy had gone//

Needs comma after this.

>showiest catsuit she had ever laid eyes on. Rarity’s flair showed//

Watch the word repetition.

>“ She//

Extraneous space.

>lobule//

I'd watch the advanced word choice for this scene. Keep in mind that you've set Sweetie Belle as your perspective character, so you need to keep the word choice and voicing close to her. Yes, she's a little older now, but this'd be pretty advanced even for most of the adults.

>new-born//

newborn

>“Yeah, like an intact spine,” Lyra muttered.//

Getting pretty talking heads again.

>It’s brilliant, sis; your best design yet. //

Misused semicolon, and "Sis" would be capitalized when used as a term of address.

>Despite her pride and tough exterior//

As placed in the sentence, this seems to describe Sweetie Belle. Okay, this entire paragraph is a little heavy-handed with the exposition. Again, keep in mind that Sweetie Belle is your perspective character, so it implies that she's actually standing there reasoning all this out in this manner while all this happens around her. While possible, it still feels a bit formal. She might think more anecdotally, coming up with an example of when Rarity demonstrated this behavior. An example speaks a lot louder than a list of generalities.

>speculatively//

How does this look? That's not really something that changes how you hear the speech, like "softly" might. It gets to her mindset while saying it, which is why it's better to show that through more subtle means that declaring it. If she holds a hoof to her mouth and counts under her breath, for instance, it gets that across in a much more engaging way.

>Rarity was a fabulous designer but a menace in the kitchen.//

Really? She did breakfast just fine in "Sisterhooves Social."

>Rarity sighed.//

Her narration gets this exact same sentence twice in a row.

>Applejack is fidgeter and I only ever asked Rainbow Dash once.//

Comma needed and missing word.

>hangar//

hanger

>joined the other four on the rail.”//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>Sweetie Belle swallowed and took a steadying breath//

Just pointing out another spot where it's done well. We get her mood through her behavior without your ever having to mention it.

>She spoke as it she had//

Typo.

>I had my reasons but they weren’t good ones//

Needs a comma.

>diatribe//

Not sure I'd characterize what she's saying as a diatribe, but that's also a pretty advanced word for Sweetie-Belle-as-narrator.

>Rarity gets distracted and ignores me all the time but I never take it personally.//

Needs a comma.

>hoping she communicated unconcerned forgiveness and not the glee that was actually bubbling inside her.//

Instead of bluntly saying these emotions, focus on what effect Sweetie Belle wants to achieve.

>Lyra looked genuinely relieved.//

How does that look?

>Doh, ray, mi, fah, so, la, ti, doh!//

Might as well use the standard spellings: Do, er, mi, fa, sol, la, ti, do.

>Maybe you’re the next Sapphire Shores and your sister will be designing stage costumes for you someday.//

Needs a comma.

>shier pier//

I've always heard that as "short." Is this a local expression from Scotland or Wales or something? It doesn't have an entry in either Webster's or OED.

>What am I writing that for?//

This is probably the first thing you wrote in a letter that didn't strike me as authentic. If she really felt bad about writing that, then she'd start a new letter and leave it out. It's not like it's spoken and once it's out there, it's too late to take it back. She's expressing regret while she's still writing the letter, but she's not committed to saying it until she's dropped it in the mailbox. This smacks of contrivance more than natural correspondence. If she leaves it in there now, she does so deliberately.

>side-tracked//

sidetracked

>and if you have never come to Ponyville//

Verb form, and needs a comma after this.

>lesson In the big black appointment book//

Extraneous capitalization.

>sighing happily//

There's enough there that you could cut the "happily."

>She grabbed her saddlebags and coat from her peg and dashing away before he could respond.//

Verb form.

>and was crossed the distance//

Verb form.

>Her chin met frozen asphalt and she travelled the last few feet on her face.//

Needs a comma.

>When she got up//

Needs a comma after this.

>Did I make it in time?//

This is the first time I've seen a direct thought that has to be one as phrased. The narrator would have to say "she."

>If it was upside down//

Needs a comma after this.

>Sagging in disappointment and self-recrimination//

Give me the evidence, not the conclusion. Let the indirect narrative thoughts carry this.

>Twilight looked startled//

Describe it.

>in obvious concern//

Show it. Otherwise, it doesn't mean near as much.

>She had been as shocked and horrified as everypony else last month//

Needs a comma after this.

>She had read books in anticipation of the day when she might have to go through it herself//

Needs a comma after this.

>“I thought friendship was about being there for others even when they don’t want it. Isn’t that what motivated you to dedicate all that time to honouring your Dragon Code with Applejack?”//

Why don't we get a visual reaction to what Spike said to her? He's directly challenged her, so she's not going to deadpan it.

>meddling//

Just used that word two sentences ago, and there's no effect created by the repetition.

>Lyra remained exactly where she had been; on the couch, staring into space, a mug of sweetened tea clasped between her forehooves.//

Misused semicolon.

>She was a passing acquaintance; somepony you could nod at in the street but not strike up an idle conversation with.//

Misused semicolon.

>When he was done//

Needs a comma after this.

>Spike waved a claw in front of her face but she only blinked//

Needs a comma.

>under the guise of fetching the bread//

But he already brought it out.

>even if it did prove you were right. “Something’s not right.”//

Watch addressing the reader and the repetition.

>long forgotten//

Hyphenate.

>She didn’t understand what was wrong with the other unicorn but she did grasp that spooking her was not a good idea.//

Needs a comma.

>he reassured//

That's a transitive verb. It requires a direct object.

>I … no. no, I’m, sure that’s not a possibility.//

Capitalization, and that last comma is extraneous.

>Minuette trailed off.//

Already apparent. You don't need to narrate it.

>I should have sat her down and talked to her but I just shoved students at her as a distraction so neither of us would have to talk about it.//

Needs a comma.

>I don’t see anypony but it’s dark inside.//

Needs a comma.

>said twilight.//

Capitalization. Also note that after the first paragraph of this scene, there's barely any narration for the next six. could use some more to avoid talking heads.

>Subsection B of a Volume Twelve//

That "a" is extraneous.

>may have caused themselves bodily harm or be at risk of causing themselves bodily harm//

That's oddly specific. Why have a separate law governing suicide (or delusion, I suppose)? Why not just generally if the occupant is suspected to be in harm's way, like if a robber had been seen to enter?

>The door flew inward, cracking a little.//

Twilight's there. Why doesn't she simply teleport inside?

>but before she could inspect what it was//

Surround this bit with commas.

>balled up//

Hyphenate.

>A dresser draw//

Typo.

>Rainbow Dash snapped her head back to Applejack in surprise.//

The "in surprise" isn't necessary.

>gave Momma Sheep the slip.//

Repetitive phrasing with what she said the last time she spoke.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>It’s freezing out here but I don’t think she was even wearing a scarf!//

Needs a comma.

>Applejack Turned//

Capitalization.

>Mr Cake//

Earlier, you'd used a period with the abbreviation, and for Mrs. Cake as well. I understand this way is common in British usage, so either is fine, but be consistent.

>Rainbow!//

Italicize the exclamation mark, too.

>Applejack echoed in surprise.//

Show me her surprise. Keep in mind you've had Dash as your perspective character for the scene so far (though a couple spots almost felt like Mr. Cake), so it'll be what Dash perceives.

>Sure enough, there was Twilight running towards them//

Well, now it seems like you're going for Applejack's perspective. The "in surprise" bit is odd then, since it's essentially AJ making the observation about herself, and if se's truly surprised, she won't be that self-aware. I will say that the transition into A's head wasn't a bad one, since it didn't jump straight there from a subjective statement in another character's viewpoint. Just keep it with AJ for a while.

>All three looked worried.//

How so?

>the big stallion//

You just described him as such.

>but with Rainbow you could never be sure//

Watch addressing the reader.

>but once they got going//

Needs a comma after this.

>Ponyville Station was usually a hub of activity.//

I don't see a purpose to this scene at all.

>You couldn’t see the station from here.//

Watch addressing the reader.

>She opened her eyes and for a brief second all she saw was the rumpled silhouette of a pony with hair so mussed she was unrecognisable.//

Needs a comma.

>Her hooves scrambled and slipping in the snow.//

Verb form.

>in pain//

Don't need this.

>yelp of pain//

Just used that phrasing, and the "of pain" is unnecessary anyway.

> Her head hurt and her mind couldn’t make the connections between everything that was going on.//

Needs a comma.

>twisted up in visions of twisted//

Repetition.

>We did that already and it wasn’t the right thing to do then//

Needs a comma.

>she came to trembling stop//

Missing word.

>cautious but resolute//

What does this look like? Your perspective's with Lyra, and she's pretty out of it to be coming to fairly esoteric conclusions like this.

>Pieces of a jigsaw strove to fit together in her head but it was like trying to finish it without the picture on the box for reference.//

Needs a comma.

>her parents came and you//

Needs a comma.

>Lyra fought it but the force of reality was as inexorable as gravity pulling her wingless body down.//

Needs a comma.

>She pressed a hankie to her face but it was dry as the bottom of a hoof in the desert.//

Needs a comma.

>If her grandmother hadn’t seen that wretched advertisement for that wretched candy store she would have stayed and come to her senses.//

Needs a comma.

>all this time!” “//

Those extraneous quotation marks are apparently supposed to go with the next paragraph.

>N-No//

Only capitalize the first one.

>her grief translating itself into a desire to hurt somepony else//

Watch the perspective. I don't know how Lyra could know this.

>I’ve lost my daughter and my mother in the same week and I will never forgive you for that//

Needs a comma.

>she continued to nuzzle and provide comfort the only way she knew how//

Watch the perspective. I get that Lyra's in a state where she's not going to notice much around her, so it's tempting to switch to someone else. And it's even fine to do so. The problem is that you only stay there for a couple sentences. If it's worth going to her, it's worth staying there a little while.

>Pink blossom dotted the trees//

I think you meant that to be plural.

>It didn’t take much to knock the blossoms free of their branches.//

Watch the repetition of "blossoms."

>Spring//

Why is that capitalized?

>blossom-laden//

And more use of that word.

>engraved gold//

Missing an "in"?

>It miss you every day.//

Typo.

>carry in speaking//

Did you mean "on"?

>On the grave beneath the tree, a wedding ring glittered.//

This feels a little disconnected, since I never saw her move to put anything there.

Aside from the detailed points, I don't have much to say. It's a well-constructed story. At first, I felt like you spilled the beans too quickly as to the nature of the problem, but now I'm not so sure. Rather than being a surprise for the reader, it plays more toward watching how everyone else deals with her delusions. So in the end, I think it works. The only thing is that a few of the early scenes played it a little heavy-handed. It's pretty obvious what's happening anyway, and even if a few readers miss some subtle clues early on, there's still plenty of space left for them to notice what's going on. The scene with Minuette and Noteworthy speaking after they think Lyra's left immediately comes to mind, as well as the big encounter in the grocery store. Those could use a subtler touch with how explicitly they allude to Lyra's problem.

I'm a little bit mystified as to Lyra's motives in leaving the ring on the grave. Certainly, people do that from time to time, but the two main reasons are typically to symbolize that they've gotten over the death to the point that they've washed their hands of it (which Lyra hasn't, since she doesn't say anything to that effect and implies she'll keep visiting), or that they've found someone else and feel that it's okay to move on (which Lyra hasn't, or she would have said so). I don't think the story's weak for not resolving this, but it's, well, unresolved.

When you're ready to resubmit, please use the "back from Mars" option.
<span class="unkfunc">&gt;in terror//</span><br />Show it in her face, not the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But <abbr title="Sleepless in Ponyville">sip</abbr> is slow anyhow.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Eventually she stopped looking like she was about to cry and Lyra released her magic.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Bell//</span><br />Typo. Do a search for these, as I noticed more than one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;great-aunts//</span><br />Another one. Do Brits normally hyphenate compound nouns like this?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A feeling went up her spine; not a shiver but something else, like the tip of a hoof running over each vertebra without actually touching them.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Your sister doesn’t seem to like me much so I wondered whether she’d approve of you hanging out with me.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ag-.//</span><br />Use a real dash, and the period is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Discomfort showed clearly in Sweetie Belle’s expression.//</span><br />How so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;How weird is –“//</span><br />Another thing that can break smart quotes is dashes. These are backward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hi Pinkie!//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;present the first two like a medieval pony presenting//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At first she had thought Lyra was asleep but that had not been the case.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;middle of tutoring session//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;last Winter//</span><br />Why is that capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And she needs six more of them so I’m afraid I require your modelling services for a while longer, darling.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m already late but I didn’t like to say//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;B-But//</span><br />Only capitalize the first one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When Fluttershy had gone//</span><br />Needs comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;showiest catsuit she had ever laid eyes on. Rarity’s flair showed//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“ She//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lobule//</span><br />I&#039;d watch the advanced word choice for this scene. Keep in mind that you&#039;ve set Sweetie Belle as your perspective character, so you need to keep the word choice and voicing close to her. Yes, she&#039;s a little older now, but this&#039;d be pretty advanced even for most of the adults.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;new-born//</span><br />newborn<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Yeah, like an intact spine,” Lyra muttered.//</span><br />Getting pretty talking heads again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s brilliant, sis; your best design yet. //</span><br />Misused semicolon, and &quot;Sis&quot; would be capitalized when used as a term of address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Despite her pride and tough exterior//</span><br />As placed in the sentence, this seems to describe Sweetie Belle. Okay, this entire paragraph is a little heavy-handed with the exposition. Again, keep in mind that Sweetie Belle is your perspective character, so it implies that she&#039;s actually standing there reasoning all this out in this manner while all this happens around her. While possible, it still feels a bit formal. She might think more anecdotally, coming up with an example of when Rarity demonstrated this behavior. An example speaks a lot louder than a list of generalities.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;speculatively//</span><br />How does this look? That&#039;s not really something that changes how you hear the speech, like &quot;softly&quot; might. It gets to her mindset while saying it, which is why it&#039;s better to show that through more subtle means that declaring it. If she holds a hoof to her mouth and counts under her breath, for instance, it gets that across in a much more engaging way.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity was a fabulous designer but a menace in the kitchen.//</span><br />Really? She did breakfast just fine in &quot;Sisterhooves Social.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity sighed.//</span><br />Her narration gets this exact same sentence twice in a row.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack is fidgeter and I only ever asked Rainbow Dash once.//</span><br />Comma needed and missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hangar//</span><br />hanger<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;joined the other four on the rail.”//</span><br />Extraneous quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sweetie Belle swallowed and took a steadying breath//</span><br />Just pointing out another spot where it&#039;s done well. We get her mood through her behavior without your ever having to mention it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She spoke as it she had//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I had my reasons but they weren’t good ones//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;diatribe//</span><br />Not sure I&#039;d characterize what she&#039;s saying as a diatribe, but that&#039;s also a pretty advanced word for Sweetie-Belle-as-narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rarity gets distracted and ignores me all the time but I never take it personally.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoping she communicated unconcerned forgiveness and not the glee that was actually bubbling inside her.//</span><br />Instead of bluntly saying these emotions, focus on what effect Sweetie Belle wants to achieve.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra looked genuinely relieved.//</span><br />How does that look?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Doh, ray, mi, fah, so, la, ti, doh!//</span><br />Might as well use the standard spellings: Do, er, mi, fa, sol, la, ti, do.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maybe you’re the next Sapphire Shores and your sister will be designing stage costumes for you someday.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shier pier//</span><br />I&#039;ve always heard that as &quot;short.&quot; Is this a local expression from Scotland or Wales or something? It doesn&#039;t have an entry in either Webster&#039;s or OED.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What am I writing that for?//</span><br />This is probably the first thing you wrote in a letter that didn&#039;t strike me as authentic. If she really felt bad about writing that, then she&#039;d start a new letter and leave it out. It&#039;s not like it&#039;s spoken and once it&#039;s out there, it&#039;s too late to take it back. She&#039;s expressing regret while she&#039;s still writing the letter, but she&#039;s not committed to saying it until she&#039;s dropped it in the mailbox. This smacks of contrivance more than natural correspondence. If she leaves it in there now, she does so deliberately.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;side-tracked//</span><br />sidetracked<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and if you have never come to Ponyville//</span><br />Verb form, and needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lesson In the big black appointment book//</span><br />Extraneous capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sighing happily//</span><br />There&#039;s enough there that you could cut the &quot;happily.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She grabbed her saddlebags and coat from her peg and dashing away before he could respond.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and was crossed the distance//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her chin met frozen asphalt and she travelled the last few feet on her face.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When she got up//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Did I make it in time?//</span><br />This is the first time I&#039;ve seen a direct thought that has to be one as phrased. The narrator would have to say &quot;she.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If it was upside down//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sagging in disappointment and self-recrimination//</span><br />Give me the evidence, not the conclusion. Let the indirect narrative thoughts carry this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight looked startled//</span><br />Describe it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in obvious concern//</span><br />Show it. Otherwise, it doesn&#039;t mean near as much.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had been as shocked and horrified as everypony else last month//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had read books in anticipation of the day when she might have to go through it herself//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“I thought friendship was about being there for others even when they don’t want it. Isn’t that what motivated you to dedicate all that time to honouring your Dragon Code with Applejack?”//</span><br />Why don&#039;t we get a visual reaction to what Spike said to her? He&#039;s directly challenged her, so she&#039;s not going to deadpan it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;meddling//</span><br />Just used that word two sentences ago, and there&#039;s no effect created by the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra remained exactly where she had been; on the couch, staring into space, a mug of sweetened tea clasped between her forehooves.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was a passing acquaintance; somepony you could nod at in the street but not strike up an idle conversation with.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When he was done//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike waved a claw in front of her face but she only blinked//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;under the guise of fetching the bread//</span><br />But he already brought it out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;even if it did prove you were right. “Something’s not right.”//</span><br />Watch addressing the reader and the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;long forgotten//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t understand what was wrong with the other unicorn but she did grasp that spooking her was not a good idea.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;he reassured//</span><br />That&#039;s a transitive verb. It requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I … no. no, I’m, sure that’s not a possibility.//</span><br />Capitalization, and that last comma is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Minuette trailed off.//</span><br />Already apparent. You don&#039;t need to narrate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I should have sat her down and talked to her but I just shoved students at her as a distraction so neither of us would have to talk about it.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t see anypony but it’s dark inside.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said twilight.//</span><br />Capitalization. Also note that after the first paragraph of this scene, there&#039;s barely any narration for the next six. could use some more to avoid talking heads.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Subsection B of a Volume Twelve//</span><br />That &quot;a&quot; is extraneous.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;may have caused themselves bodily harm or be at risk of causing themselves bodily harm//</span><br />That&#039;s oddly specific. Why have a separate law governing suicide (or delusion, I suppose)? Why not just generally if the occupant is suspected to be in harm&#039;s way, like if a robber had been seen to enter?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The door flew inward, cracking a little.//</span><br />Twilight&#039;s there. Why doesn&#039;t she simply teleport inside?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but before she could inspect what it was//</span><br />Surround this bit with commas.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;balled up//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A dresser draw//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow Dash snapped her head back to Applejack in surprise.//</span><br />The &quot;in surprise&quot; isn&#039;t necessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;gave Momma Sheep the slip.//</span><br />Repetitive phrasing with what she said the last time she spoke.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Backward apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s freezing out here but I don’t think she was even wearing a scarf!//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack Turned//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mr Cake//</span><br />Earlier, you&#039;d used a period with the abbreviation, and for Mrs. Cake as well. I understand this way is common in British usage, so either is fine, but be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>Rainbow</i>!//</span><br />Italicize the exclamation mark, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applejack echoed in surprise.//</span><br />Show me her surprise. Keep in mind you&#039;ve had Dash as your perspective character for the scene so far (though a couple spots almost felt like Mr. Cake), so it&#039;ll be what Dash perceives.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sure enough, there was Twilight running towards them//</span><br />Well, now it seems like you&#039;re going for Applejack&#039;s perspective. The &quot;in surprise&quot; bit is odd then, since it&#039;s essentially AJ making the observation about herself, and if se&#039;s truly surprised, she won&#039;t be that self-aware. I will say that the transition into A&#039;s head wasn&#039;t a bad one, since it didn&#039;t jump straight there from a subjective statement in another character&#039;s viewpoint. Just keep it with AJ for a while.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All three looked worried.//</span><br />How so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the big stallion//</span><br />You just described him as such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but with Rainbow you could never be sure//</span><br />Watch addressing the reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but once they got going//</span><br />Needs a comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville Station was usually a hub of activity.//</span><br />I don&#039;t see a purpose to this scene at all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You couldn’t see the station from here.//</span><br />Watch addressing the reader.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She opened her eyes and for a brief second all she saw was the rumpled silhouette of a pony with hair so mussed she was unrecognisable.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her hooves scrambled and slipping in the snow.//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in pain//</span><br />Don&#039;t need this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;yelp of pain//</span><br />Just used that phrasing, and the &quot;of pain&quot; is unnecessary anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; Her head hurt and her mind couldn’t make the connections between everything that was going on.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;twisted up in visions of twisted//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We did that already and it wasn’t the right thing to do then//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she came to trembling stop//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cautious but resolute//</span><br />What does this look like? Your perspective&#039;s with Lyra, and she&#039;s pretty out of it to be coming to fairly esoteric conclusions like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pieces of a jigsaw strove to fit together in her head but it was like trying to finish it without the picture on the box for reference.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her parents came and you//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Lyra fought it but the force of reality was as inexorable as gravity pulling her wingless body down.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She pressed a hankie to her face but it was dry as the bottom of a hoof in the desert.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If her grandmother hadn’t seen that wretched advertisement for that wretched candy store she would have stayed and come to her senses.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;all this time!” “//</span><br />Those extraneous quotation marks are apparently supposed to go with the next paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;N-No//</span><br />Only capitalize the first one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her grief translating itself into a desire to hurt somepony else//</span><br />Watch the perspective. I don&#039;t know how Lyra could know this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’ve lost my daughter and my mother in the same week and I will never forgive you for that//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she continued to nuzzle and provide comfort the only way she knew how//</span><br />Watch the perspective. I get that Lyra&#039;s in a state where she&#039;s not going to notice much around her, so it&#039;s tempting to switch to someone else. And it&#039;s even fine to do so. The problem is that you only stay there for a couple sentences. If it&#039;s worth going to her, it&#039;s worth staying there a little while.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pink blossom dotted the trees//</span><br />I think you meant that to be plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It didn’t take much to knock the blossoms free of their branches.//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;blossoms.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spring//</span><br />Why is that capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blossom-laden//</span><br />And more use of that word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;engraved gold//</span><br />Missing an &quot;in&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It miss you every day.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;carry in speaking//</span><br />Did you mean &quot;on&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On the grave beneath the tree, a wedding ring glittered.//</span><br />This feels a little disconnected, since I never saw her move to put anything there.<br /><br />Aside from the detailed points, I don&#039;t have much to say. It&#039;s a well-constructed story. At first, I felt like you spilled the beans too quickly as to the nature of the problem, but now I&#039;m not so sure. Rather than being a surprise for the reader, it plays more toward watching how everyone else deals with her delusions. So in the end, I think it works. The only thing is that a few of the early scenes played it a little heavy-handed. It&#039;s pretty obvious what&#039;s happening anyway, and even if a few readers miss some subtle clues early on, there&#039;s still plenty of space left for them to notice what&#039;s going on. The scene with Minuette and Noteworthy speaking after they think Lyra&#039;s left immediately comes to mind, as well as the big encounter in the grocery store. Those could use a subtler touch with how explicitly they allude to Lyra&#039;s problem.<br /><br />I&#039;m a <i>little</i> bit mystified as to Lyra&#039;s motives in leaving the ring on the grave. Certainly, people do that from time to time, but the two main reasons are typically to symbolize that they&#039;ve gotten over the death to the point that they&#039;ve washed their hands of it (which Lyra hasn&#039;t, since she doesn&#039;t say anything to that effect and implies she&#039;ll keep visiting), or that they&#039;ve found someone else and feel that it&#039;s okay to move on (which Lyra hasn&#039;t, or she would have said so). I don&#039;t think the story&#039;s weak for not resolving this, but it&#039;s, well, unresolved.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please use the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Wed, Feb 11th, 2015 16:58</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 343

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>far-away//

No need to hyphenate that.

>You needed only put a hoof down in the wrong mud and they'd yank you under fast as blinking.//

>You needed only put a hoof down in the wrong mud and they'd yank you under fast as blinking.//
>Asterius bellowed for us to form a wedge and we fell in//
>As he turned away the captain muttered//
>When he spoke again there was a new urgency to his message.//
>Time skipped and I was at her side//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>reeking smoke from whatever struck it down//

It's a completed action in a past-tense narration, so use past perfect tense. "had struck"

>rearguard//

I've never seen that as one word. There's more than one instance.

>in—//

It'd be easy to do a search and replace. An em dash is Alt+0151.

>afterimages//

You're inconsistent about whether or not you hyphenate this.

>S’gonna//

The missing letter is before the "s," not after it. 'S gonna

>but all I could hear was the keening in my ears//

This is already the third time within a page that he says he can't hear anything. It's getting repetitive.

>looming out of the night//

Set off participles with a comma.

>I dunno//

This stands out as incongruous with the rest of the language he's been using. He takes great pains to word things very precisely and with advanced word choice, so this really feels out of place.

>Funny thing is, I remember every word of their conversation.//

Okay, I think this is a mistake. You start the story by framing it as your protagonist telling it to an audience. Then you fade into the story, and it's easy to take it as reliving the events with him instead of still hearing him tell the audience. For the latter, it wouldn't make sense that he'd remember so many details about events and places, and that he'd be able to present quoted dialogue. Then here, you make the same point: that it's unusual he'd remember the exchange word for word.

If you're going to periodically go back into storyteller/audience mode, then it's better to set off the past events as separate scenes so that it's believable, like I said, that we're reliving his reminiscence instead of hearing him tell it. Or on the other hand, cut out these reversions to the speaker/audience mode so it stays in flashbacks. Either way, it's bad that you've pointed out how amazing it is that he can remember this particular conversation verbatim when he's been presenting all of them so far as such. It doesn't have the contrast you're trying to create.

>lieutenant//

When used as a term of address, ranks should be capitalized.

>south-west//

southwest

>while he mulled//

That's a transitive verb. It requires a direct object.

>‘em//

Smart quotes are bad a leading apostrophes. This is backward. But it's also dipping into the vernacular a bit much again and feeling incongruous with the fancy diction in the narration.

>It stung. Smoke twisted from a scorch mark just here, over my heart.//

Another spot where you should consider how you want to present your narration.

>He said, “My name is Renald Risarin,” chest heaving.//

That's pretty ungainly to have dialogue split narration in a single sentence that's actually a quote. Usually it's the other way around or segregated.

>“Tercáno,” said the captain in Laewtil.//

This is starting to get cumbersome. They've spoken this language before. Doing something like this is a delicate matter. If it doesn't come up much, and the characters react enough to it that I can intuit what it means, that's fine. Or if it's rare and it doesn't matter what it means, that's fine. But I'm getting the impression now that I'm supposed to be reading something into these words, and it's just not clicking with me. It's also odd that you're just now identifying the language.

>We shall pursue those refugees, and find whatever wiped out that patrol.//

That's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>to which I will admit casting more than one longing gaze after//

The "to" is already your preposition, so having the "after" as well is redundant.

>Only, there was something odd about some of them.//

There's not a grammatical reason to have a comma there.

>with sorrow sharp on his face//

If you want me to sympathize with the character, let me see this, rather than just have the narrator directly inform me of it,

>He grit//

The only accepted past tense of that is "gritted."

>The Hart just looked lost. Abandoned.

>
>I looked to Asterius. He looked to us//
Look (heh) at all that repetition of "look."

>Asterius looked at me and I looked at him.//

Same deal.

>and those few want little part of you or I//

"Me," not "I." It's part of the compound object of a preposition.

That was well written and a nice enough story. But I have to say that I spent the vast majority of it wondering what possible relevance it had to MLP. It borrows the minotaur race, but they're so vaguely defined in canon anyway that there's nothing tying these minotaurs to Iron Will through any sort of lore or world-building. Then the deer could possibly have come from the main series comic #27, though it may be a risky bet to require readers to know comic canon.

When we finally get to see a pony, it's inconsequential that she is one; she could have easily been some wildebeest or goat or something, and it wouldn't have changed a thing. Then there's the oblique reference to Clover the Clever, but again, nothing comes of it. The fact that it's she in particular and what we know of her from canon has no impact here. She'd learned a lesson of friendship at Hearth's Warming, assuming her appearance comes after that, and she might have related it to him, though he'd already cast off his warlike attitude anyway, and past that, it's not clear that she had any effect on him.

It's one of those cases where I have to ask whether this is even an MLP fanfic. In less than five minutes, it could have all relation to MLP excised, and what's there is minor anyway. This would stand fine as original fiction.

However… while I think you'd have a stronger story by making the ties to ponies more concrete and introduced earlier, I'm not going to require you do that. It's your risk to take, since readers may have the same experience of wondering what ponies have to do with it, and they may drop away without finishing it.

The ending falls apart a little, as all these alliances dissolve, and I'm no longer sure who is supposed to be friends with whom. The pronghorn, too—your protagonist assumes he would be an ally, though the pronghorn clearly has some different insight as to the behind-the-scenes politics, yet I never understood it.

Really, the biggest issue for me was how the narrative was framed and how it breaks back in at times in a way that doesn't quite fit how the story is presented. But I've already discussed that. What I want to add here is that it can open a can of worms when you imply or explicitly declare an audience for the story. It wouldn't take much to do so here, but since it's the choice you've made, it deserves to be justified. Who is his audience? I can gather from the ending that they are ponies, but exactly who makes a big difference. Is he talking to a meeting of Celestia's political advisers? To an assembly of high-school students? At a cultural event? To a group of historians? Each one would have very different implications as to what the story means to them and what wll happen afterward as a result of hearing it.

I'm willing to cut you some slack here, because the writing is good, and we're more interested in featuring what's good than what's popular. So please fix the detailed stuff. I'd strongly recommend revising the narrative framing one way or the other to be consistent. It's a good idea to give me at least a little on the audience for the story, and I think making earlier and more obvious connections to ponies would help you retain readers, but I'll leave these last two at your discretion. With a little more work, it should be good to post.

When you're ready to resubmit, choose the "back from Mars" option.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;far-away//</span><br />No need to hyphenate that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You needed only put a hoof down in the wrong mud and they&#039;d yank you under fast as blinking.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You needed only put a hoof down in the wrong mud and they&#039;d yank you under fast as blinking.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Asterius bellowed for us to form a wedge and we fell in//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As he turned away the captain muttered//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When he spoke again there was a new urgency to his message.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Time skipped and I was at her side//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;reeking smoke from whatever struck it down//</span><br />It&#039;s a completed action in a past-tense narration, so use past perfect tense. &quot;had struck&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rearguard//</span><br />I&#039;ve never seen that as one word. There&#039;s more than one instance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in—//</span><br />It&#039;d be easy to do a search and replace. An em dash is Alt+0151.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;afterimages//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent about whether or not you hyphenate this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;S’gonna//</span><br />The missing letter is before the &quot;s,&quot; not after it. &#039;S gonna<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but all I could hear was the keening in my ears//</span><br />This is already the third time within a page that he says he can&#039;t hear anything. It&#039;s getting repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looming out of the night//</span><br />Set off participles with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I dunno//</span><br />This stands out as incongruous with the rest of the language he&#039;s been using. He takes great pains to word things very precisely and with advanced word choice, so this really feels out of place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Funny thing is, I remember every word of their conversation.//</span><br />Okay, I think this is a mistake. You start the story by framing it as your protagonist telling it to an audience. Then you fade into the story, and it&#039;s easy to take it as reliving the events with him instead of still hearing him tell the audience. For the latter, it wouldn&#039;t make sense that he&#039;d remember so many details about events and places, and that he&#039;d be able to present quoted dialogue. Then here, you make the same point: that it&#039;s unusual he&#039;d remember the exchange word for word.<br /><br />If you&#039;re going to periodically go back into storyteller/audience mode, then it&#039;s better to set off the past events as separate scenes so that it&#039;s believable, like I said, that we&#039;re reliving his reminiscence instead of hearing him tell it. Or on the other hand, cut out these reversions to the speaker/audience mode so it stays in flashbacks. Either way, it&#039;s bad that you&#039;ve pointed out how amazing it is that he can remember this particular conversation verbatim when he&#039;s been presenting all of them so far as such. It doesn&#039;t have the contrast you&#039;re trying to create.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;lieutenant//</span><br />When used as a term of address, ranks should be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;south-west//</span><br />southwest<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;while he mulled//</span><br />That&#039;s a transitive verb. It requires a direct object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Smart quotes are bad a leading apostrophes. This is backward. But it&#039;s also dipping into the vernacular a bit much again and feeling incongruous with the fancy diction in the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It stung. Smoke twisted from a scorch mark just here, over my heart.//</span><br />Another spot where you should consider how you want to present your narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He said, “My name is Renald Risarin,” chest heaving.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty ungainly to have dialogue split narration in a single sentence that&#039;s actually a quote. Usually it&#039;s the other way around or segregated.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Tercáno,” said the captain in Laewtil.//</span><br />This is starting to get cumbersome. They&#039;ve spoken this language before. Doing something like this is a delicate matter. If it doesn&#039;t come up much, and the characters react enough to it that I can intuit what it means, that&#039;s fine. Or if it&#039;s rare and it doesn&#039;t matter what it means, that&#039;s fine. But I&#039;m getting the impression now that I&#039;m supposed to be reading something into these words, and it&#039;s just not clicking with me. It&#039;s also odd that you&#039;re just now identifying the language.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We shall pursue those refugees, and find whatever wiped out that patrol.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to which I will admit casting more than one longing gaze after//</span><br />The &quot;to&quot; is already your preposition, so having the &quot;after&quot; as well is redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Only, there was something odd about some of them.//</span><br />There&#039;s not a grammatical reason to have a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with sorrow sharp on his face//</span><br />If you want me to sympathize with the character, let me see this, rather than just have the narrator directly inform me of it,<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He grit//</span><br />The only accepted past tense of that is &quot;gritted.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The Hart just looked lost. Abandoned.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;I looked to Asterius. He looked to us//</span><br />Look (heh) at all that repetition of &quot;look.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Asterius looked at me and I looked at him.//</span><br />Same deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and those few want little part of you or I//</span><br />&quot;Me,&quot; not &quot;I.&quot; It&#039;s part of the compound object of a preposition.<br /><br />That was well written and a nice enough story. But I have to say that I spent the vast majority of it wondering what possible relevance it had to MLP. It borrows the minotaur race, but they&#039;re so vaguely defined in canon anyway that there&#039;s nothing tying these minotaurs to Iron Will through any sort of lore or world-building. Then the deer could possibly have come from the main series comic #27, though it may be a risky bet to require readers to know comic canon.<br /><br />When we finally get to see a pony, it&#039;s inconsequential that she is one; she could have easily been some wildebeest or goat or something, and it wouldn&#039;t have changed a thing. Then there&#039;s the oblique reference to Clover the Clever, but again, nothing comes of it. The fact that it&#039;s she in particular and what we know of her from canon has no impact here. She&#039;d learned a lesson of friendship at Hearth&#039;s Warming, assuming her appearance comes after that, and she might have related it to him, though he&#039;d already cast off his warlike attitude anyway, and past that, it&#039;s not clear that she had any effect on him.<br /><br />It&#039;s one of those cases where I have to ask whether this is even an MLP fanfic. In less than five minutes, it could have all relation to MLP excised, and what&#039;s there is minor anyway. This would stand fine as original fiction.<br /><br />However… while I think you&#039;d have a stronger story by making the ties to ponies more concrete and introduced earlier, I&#039;m not going to require you do that. It&#039;s your risk to take, since readers may have the same experience of wondering what ponies have to do with it, and they may drop away without finishing it.<br /><br />The ending falls apart a little, as all these alliances dissolve, and I&#039;m no longer sure who is supposed to be friends with whom. The pronghorn, too—your protagonist assumes he would be an ally, though the pronghorn clearly has some different insight as to the behind-the-scenes politics, yet I never understood it.<br /><br />Really, the biggest issue for me was how the narrative was framed and how it breaks back in at times in a way that doesn&#039;t quite fit how the story is presented. But I&#039;ve already discussed that. What I want to add here is that it can open a can of worms when you imply or explicitly declare an audience for the story. It wouldn&#039;t take much to do so here, but since it&#039;s the choice you&#039;ve made, it deserves to be justified. Who is his audience? I can gather from the ending that they are ponies, but exactly who makes a big difference. Is he talking to a meeting of Celestia&#039;s political advisers? To an assembly of high-school students? At a cultural event? To a group of historians? Each one would have very different implications as to what the story means to them and what wll happen afterward as a result of hearing it.<br /><br />I&#039;m willing to cut you some slack here, because the writing is good, and we&#039;re more interested in featuring what&#039;s good than what&#039;s popular. So please fix the detailed stuff. I&#039;d strongly recommend revising the narrative framing one way or the other to be consistent. It&#039;s a good idea to give me at least a little on the audience for the story, and I think making earlier and more obvious connections to ponies would help you retain readers, but I&#039;ll leave these last two at your discretion. With a little more work, it should be good to post.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, choose the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Tue, Feb 17th, 2015 12:19</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 344

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>roughhewn//

rough-hewn

Right about here, there's a whole lot of passive voice and "to be" verbs used in describing the farm. It's really not necessary, and it brings any sense of action to a screeching halt, which would be problematic anyway, but especially this close to the beginning of the story. You don't want to bore the reader right where you should be grabbing his interest.

>when Twi had left, she had left//

I don't see that the repetitive phrasing adds anything.

>order: Do not open the door//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>On time//

I'm pretty sure you chose the wrong word there, but since there are so many possibilities of what it could be, and each means something quite different, I'm not going to suggest an alternative.

>‘er//

Smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward. You'll have to paste one in the right way or add one after this, then delete the first one.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe again. Just do a sweep for these.

>her granny said in an iron tone//

There's precious little during this conversation to create a visual. Now, there are reasons why this might be the case, but you have to accentuate those reasons. Perhaps Applejack is distracted enough that she doesn't notice what her family is doing as they talk. But then you have to make her narration sound distracted. Or she might have her eyes closed so she can't see them. But you have to say that (and even then, she'd still hear what they're doing). I'd also say to take a look at how often you use direct address in this conversation (and possibly in the story in general—I'm writing this as I read it) and compare that to how often you actually do so in a real conversation. And it's like you forgot Apple Bloom was even there so far. She's doing something while all this is going on. Eating her dinner, reacting to what they say. Let me see it, or it's not worth placing her there.

>Maybe it was because she suspected that her granny wasn’t just talking about the carrots.//

This really smacks of an omniscient narrator, whereas you'd been taking a more subjective approach through much of the story.

>But in their place, she found only sadness.//

She doesn't act sad. I have nothing but the narrator's word to go on here.

>Truth from the mouth of foals.//

mouths

>That was where the real hurt was.//

And yet for a limited narrator, the prose doesn't sound that much like someone who's hurt or in anguish about it. The language is there, but not the inflection and emotion behind it.

>a small mop of red hair on the pillow//

Nothing about her bow?

>She smiled a small smile, and closed the door.//

No need for a comma there.

>mark: Two words carved into it in the homestead’s early days, ‘Sunset Room’.//

See previous comment about colons.

>A faint moan came from within.//

Well, now I'm a bit confused. You said the purpose of the charm was to seal off the room completely from the world. But I suppose you're only talking about matter, then? Because apparently it isn't an issue for sound to go back and forth. Light either, for that matter, since she could see in his window. Have they stuffed something in the crack under the door?

>He’s in pain. He’s in there suffering, and we ain’t even lifting a hoof to help, she thought.//

There are times you present a very personal line like this that's obviously Applejack's thought, but you do so as narration. That's one of the elegant things about limited narration. I don't see what the purpose is in declaring this to be a direct thought. There are times it could be, like a need to have the reader understand that the thought occurred this way, word for word, which is rare. Or because she needs to phrase it as "I" or "you," which the narrator can't do. But I don't see the advantage here.

>What if he—-//

An em dash is usually done as 3 hyphens, but when it's so easy to produce a real one, why go for the substitute?

>She lifted her hoof from the handle, and stepped away.//

No reason to have a comma there. It's all one clause, and it doesn't clear up any ambiguity.

>Without her realising it//

Cliche alert.

>She rubbed her eyes, and thought to herself that this wasn’t fair.//

Unnecessary comma.

>took a turn for the worst//

worse

>quick fix, but not expecting one. The doctors were quick//

Watch the word repetition.

>the quickest of fashions//

There's that word again, pretty soon after.

>the attempts of her and the doctors//

That's a really awkward and clunky indirect possession.

>It would allow his body able to best fight off the infection./

Syntax is off.

>At that time, she had asked herself that question: Was she doing the right thing?//

Colon issue again.

>She closed her eyes and laid like this until her chest ached.//

Lay/lie confusion.

>fur//

Ponies technically don't have fur, but almost nobody in the fandom seems to care.

>crop”//

Missing end punctuation.

>putting on a convincing smile//

The perspective's off here again. AJ is essentially the narrator, so she's making this judgment about herself, which is odd. She wouldn't know it was convincing.

>kneejerk//

knee-jerk

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom. As this is a common error, you might want to do a page search to make sure there aren't any others you missed.

>could would//

Typo.

>Cautiously, she pushed it open, and stepped inside.//

That second comma is unnecessary.

>the room was untidy//

>the tidiest of ponies//
Watch the repetition.

>Shouldn’t there air//

Typo.

>Twi had said that nothing could escape the seal, including smells.//

And, again, apparently not sounds or light.

>Why you acting like a frightened foal?//

And then when you do have something that must necessarily be a quoted thought, you don't cast it as one.

>She forced her muscles to relax, and breathed in deep.//

Unnecessary comma.

>in. The lamp sparked, and flared to life.//

Extraneous space and unnecessary comma.

>the food inside them mouldering and stinking of rot//

She'd specifically mentioned the lack of a smell before, so this is pretty contradictory.

>She retreated the lamp//

Missing word.

>poisonous leaves//

How can she tell they're poisonous?

>hoofs//

You spell it "hooves" everywhere else.

>She settled for silence, and backpedalled out of the room.//

Unnecessary comma.

>She was thrown into the far wall, and bounced down the hall.//

Unnecessary comma.

>It would take a while to unlock; time she didn’t have.//

Improper semicolon usage. There's no independent clause after it. Semicolons really do suggest a formalism that doesn't look right when they aren't used properly.

>And who says it will go for me?//

Another line that should be directed thought, as long as it stays phrased like this.

>It’s head turned to her//

Its/it's confusion.

>The twisted vines began to twist.//

Uh…

>landing, where she landed //

Watch the repetition.

I see the tie-in with "sunset," but that's still a weak ending. It peters out, more than it comes to a conclusion. That doesn't mean you can't have an open ending, but it still has to feel like it's come to a close.

The only other thing I'd add is that it was really strange that nowhere in the narration did you ever use her name. That'd be fine for first-person, but you have third. I don't know if it's a gimmick you were trying to employ; if so, it's not creating an effect for me. That's usually done to hide a character's identity, but you're not trying to here, so I don't see the point. It already bugged me that the first reference to her is by pronoun, since they work by antecedent, but then you never said it at all, except in other characters' dialogue.

I'm a little mystified by Twilight's explanation of the treatment she's pursuing. It prevents her from being able to check up on him, and if the main point is to force him to rest, why not just sedate him or put him into some kind of stasis?

Really, there's not a whole lot of stuff to fix here, just some things that need tweaking.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;roughhewn//</span><br />rough-hewn<br /><br />Right about here, there&#039;s a whole lot of passive voice and &quot;to be&quot; verbs used in describing the farm. It&#039;s really not necessary, and it brings any sense of action to a screeching halt, which would be problematic anyway, but especially this close to the beginning of the story. You don&#039;t want to bore the reader right where you should be grabbing his interest.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when Twi had left, she had left//</span><br />I don&#039;t see that the repetitive phrasing adds anything.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;order: Do not open the door//</span><br />Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On time//</span><br />I&#039;m pretty sure you chose the wrong word there, but since there are so many possibilities of what it could be, and each means something quite different, I&#039;m not going to suggest an alternative.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘er//</span><br />Smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward. You&#039;ll have to paste one in the right way or add one after this, then delete the first one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘em//</span><br />Backward apostrophe again. Just do a sweep for these.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her granny said in an iron tone//</span><br />There&#039;s precious little during this conversation to create a visual. Now, there are reasons why this might be the case, but you have to accentuate those reasons. Perhaps Applejack is distracted enough that she doesn&#039;t notice what her family is doing as they talk. But then you have to make her narration sound distracted. Or she might have her eyes closed so she can&#039;t see them. But you have to say that (and even then, she&#039;d still hear what they&#039;re doing). I&#039;d also say to take a look at how often you use direct address in this conversation (and possibly in the story in general—I&#039;m writing this as I read it) and compare that to how often you actually do so in a real conversation. And it&#039;s like you forgot Apple Bloom was even there so far. She&#039;s doing something while all this is going on. Eating her dinner, reacting to what they say. Let me see it, or it&#039;s not worth placing her there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Maybe it was because she suspected that her granny wasn’t just talking about the carrots.//</span><br />This really smacks of an omniscient narrator, whereas you&#039;d been taking a more subjective approach through much of the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But in their place, she found only sadness.//</span><br />She doesn&#039;t act sad. I have nothing but the narrator&#039;s word to go on here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Truth from the mouth of foals.//</span><br />mouths<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That was where the real hurt was.//</span><br />And yet for a limited narrator, the prose doesn&#039;t sound that much like someone who&#039;s hurt or in anguish about it. The language is there, but not the inflection and emotion behind it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a small mop of red hair on the pillow//</span><br />Nothing about her bow?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smiled a small smile, and closed the door.//</span><br />No need for a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mark: Two words carved into it in the homestead’s early days, ‘Sunset Room’.//</span><br />See previous comment about colons.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A faint moan came from within.//</span><br />Well, now I&#039;m a bit confused. You said the purpose of the charm was to seal off the room completely from the world. But I suppose you&#039;re only talking about matter, then? Because apparently it isn&#039;t an issue for sound to go back and forth. Light either, for that matter, since she could see in his window. Have they stuffed something in the crack under the door?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>He’s in pain. He’s in there suffering, and we ain’t even lifting a hoof to help</i>, she thought.//</span><br />There are times you present a very personal line like this that&#039;s obviously Applejack&#039;s thought, but you do so as narration. That&#039;s one of the elegant things about limited narration. I don&#039;t see what the purpose is in declaring this to be a direct thought. There are times it could be, like a need to have the reader understand that the thought occurred this way, word for word, which is rare. Or because she needs to phrase it as &quot;I&quot; or &quot;you,&quot; which the narrator can&#039;t do. But I don&#039;t see the advantage here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What if he—-//</span><br />An em dash is usually done as 3 hyphens, but when it&#039;s so easy to produce a real one, why go for the substitute?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She lifted her hoof from the handle, and stepped away.//</span><br />No reason to have a comma there. It&#039;s all one clause, and it doesn&#039;t clear up any ambiguity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without her realising it//</span><br />Cliche alert.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She rubbed her eyes, and thought to herself that this wasn’t fair.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;took a turn for the worst//</span><br />worse<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;quick fix, but not expecting one. The doctors were quick//</span><br />Watch the word repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the quickest of fashions//</span><br />There&#039;s that word again, pretty soon after.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the attempts of her and the doctors//</span><br />That&#039;s a really awkward and clunky indirect possession.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It would allow his body able to best fight off the infection./</span><br />Syntax is off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At that time, she had asked herself that question: Was she doing the right thing?//</span><br />Colon issue again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She closed her eyes and laid like this until her chest ached.//</span><br />Lay/lie confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fur//</span><br />Ponies technically don&#039;t have fur, but almost nobody in the fandom seems to care.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crop”//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;putting on a convincing smile//</span><br />The perspective&#039;s off here again. AJ is essentially the narrator, so she&#039;s making this judgment about herself, which is odd. She wouldn&#039;t know it was convincing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;kneejerk//</span><br />knee-jerk<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Applebloom//</span><br />Apple Bloom. As this is a common error, you might want to do a page search to make sure there aren&#039;t any others you missed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;could would//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cautiously, she pushed it open, and stepped inside.//</span><br />That second comma is unnecessary.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the room was untidy//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the tidiest of ponies//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Shouldn’t there air//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twi had said that nothing could escape the seal, including smells.//</span><br />And, again, apparently not sounds or light.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why you acting like a frightened foal?//</span><br />And then when you do have something that must necessarily be a quoted thought, you don&#039;t cast it as one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She forced her muscles to relax, and breathed in deep.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in. The lamp sparked, and flared to life.//</span><br />Extraneous space and unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the food inside them mouldering and stinking of rot//</span><br />She&#039;d specifically mentioned the lack of a smell before, so this is pretty contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She retreated the lamp//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;poisonous leaves//</span><br />How can she tell they&#039;re poisonous?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hoofs//</span><br />You spell it &quot;hooves&quot; everywhere else.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She settled for silence, and backpedalled out of the room.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was thrown into the far wall, and bounced down the hall.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It would take a while to unlock; time she didn’t have.//</span><br />Improper semicolon usage. There&#039;s no independent clause after it. Semicolons really do suggest a formalism that doesn&#039;t look right when they aren&#039;t used properly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And who says it will go for me?//</span><br />Another line that should be directed thought, as long as it stays phrased like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s head turned to her//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The twisted vines began to twist.//</span><br />Uh…<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;landing, where she landed //</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br />I see the tie-in with &quot;sunset,&quot; but that&#039;s still a weak ending. It peters out, more than it comes to a conclusion. That doesn&#039;t mean you can&#039;t have an open ending, but it still has to feel like it&#039;s come to a close.<br /><br />The only other thing I&#039;d add is that it was really strange that nowhere in the narration did you ever use her name. That&#039;d be fine for first-person, but you have third. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s a gimmick you were trying to employ; if so, it&#039;s not creating an effect for me. That&#039;s usually done to hide a character&#039;s identity, but you&#039;re not trying to here, so I don&#039;t see the point. It already bugged me that the first reference to her is by pronoun, since they work by antecedent, but then you never said it at all, except in other characters&#039; dialogue.<br /><br />I&#039;m a little mystified by Twilight&#039;s explanation of the treatment she&#039;s pursuing. It prevents her from being able to check up on him, and if the main point is to force him to rest, why not just sedate him or put him into some kind of stasis?<br /><br />Really, there&#039;s not a whole lot of stuff to fix here, just some things that need tweaking.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 345

>>132088
I've taken most of the points on board, and I'm going to do and editing sweep to fix them up. The stuff that I'm not so sure about, I'll respond to here.

>There's precious little during this conversation to create a visual.//

Hm. Personally, I think this is more of an author preference thing. Gesture and setting are an important part of dialogue, but the tone I'd set for the story was fairly stripped back up until this point, and so I tried to continue that by stripping my dialogue of all but the most important physical cues. I'll take a gander and tweak it – if it's not working, it's not working – but it will still be stylistically similar to what it was.

What are your thoughts on the matter?

>I'd also say to take a look at how often you use direct address in this conversation//

Yeah. . . . Along with "a moment later" and "well" and "a little", this is one of the barnacles that clings to my prose. I'll cut and clean.

>And it's like you forgot Apple Bloom was even there so far//

Arguably, this is the same as the "more gesture and setting" advice, because she is there, but I haven't dedicated space to reminding a reader of that.

And I have to ask, is it necessary? I can slip in a few pointers every now and then, but I'm concerned about weakening the focus of the scene. I feel that once it's established that she is there, a reader doesn't need to be reminded. But that might just be faulty thinking on my part.

>Nothing about her bow?/

I figure she takes it off to sleep, just as Applejack, later, takes off her hair ties.

>Well, now I'm a bit confused. //

Yeah, I thought at the time that the mechanics of the spell might confuse some people. In my mind, it's a slightly elastic barrier attached to the perimeter of the room that prevents matter from crossing. But because it is slightly elastic, it can still transfer vibrations. So AJ can still hear what's happening inside, albeit slightly distorted, and she can still see in.

I might have to tweak that a little, but it's difficult seeing as AJ isn't the sort to focus too much on the technical side of magic. That's more Twilight's schtick. Still, I suppose I could have her recount something "Twi" said.

>I don't see what the purpose is in declaring this to be a direct thought//

Well, this was originally narration, but before I published it to FiMFiction, I had to go through and italicise the direct thoughts (because italics in Word don't translate to italics in FiMFic). I was a little trigger happy with the italics button

But, also, I'm not that well versed in narration-thought versus direct-thought. I thought it was more a matter of preference or style. Like how in "I am Legend", all the thoughts are not italicised, despite being direct thoughts, because of the style of that time.

Could you explain the difference, please, or at least help me understand it better? Cheers.

>why go for the substitute?//

I read a humble little book once by the name of "A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius". The author, aptly enough, is something of a linguistic genius, and when a character's line of thought derailed, he used a long dash, longer than an em dash, followed by a tab to indicate it. I was trying to replicate the same here. A bit of borrowing, I guess.

Would it be worth emphasising that, or just scrapping it and going for the 'em'?

>but almost nobody in the fandom seems to care//

And neither do I!

. . .

But really, what do they have then? Hair? Maybe 'pelt' would be more suitable, because when you say 'hair' we naturally think of the head, and that is definitely not what was going for.

>That second comma is unnecessary.//

With this comma business, I've learned to use comma's more as a tool to control rhythm than in the conventional by-the-rule sense. If it works, I'd prefer to keep them, but if it's doing nothing for you, then I might as well scrape them off.

Are there any instances when having that unnecessary comma there improves the sentence, do you think? In general, and in my story?

>but it still has to feel like it's come to a close.//

Endings are one of my (many) weaknesses. I never know how exactly to end a story. Is there some place that you feel would be more natural to stop it? I'll chew through it myself and try figure it out, but it'd be nice to know what is making it weak.

>I don't know if it's a gimmick you were trying to employ//

Basically, it's a relic of the original. I threw it in to help build ambiguity and a bit of suspense. Also, I think that AJ would think more like that, think of her family by their relationship more than by their names. It seems, to me, more instinctual. "My sister" "My brother". And the same would go for herself.

Is it something that hurts the fic particularly, do you think? If so, I can change it; but I would prefer to keep it as is, in that respect.

>I'm a little mystified by Twilight's explanation of the treatment she's pursuing//

Ah, I thought I *had* mentioned her putting him into stasis. Like, he sleeps hard during the day, but awakens at sunset and sunrise to eat. I think there is a line to that effect in there somewhere.

And I could throw in a line about what Twi is researching, but to me it doesn't seem like something AJ would particularly be bothered with. She cares about the effect, her brother getting better, and isn't caught up in the particulars. As long as Twi keeps her updated about how things are going, not *what* things are going on, she is happy. So in her mind, Twi's research is "not bearing any fruit".

tl;dr: because I don't see AJ being concerned with what the research is, and she is the perspective character.

>Really, there's not a whole lot of stuff to fix here, just some things that need tweaking.//

And tweak I shall!

Seriously, thanks for all the advice. I have only got a single comment since I posted this story, and it wasn't particularly enlightening. So having all this feedback is a godsend. Thank you :)<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132088" onclick="return highlight('132088', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132088">&gt;&gt;132088</a><br />I&#039;ve taken most of the points on board, and I&#039;m going to do and editing sweep to fix them up. The stuff that I&#039;m not so sure about, I&#039;ll respond to here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There&#039;s precious little during this conversation to create a visual.//</span><br />Hm. Personally, I think this is more of an author preference thing. Gesture and setting are an important part of dialogue, but the tone I&#039;d set for the story was fairly stripped back up until this point, and so I tried to continue that by stripping my dialogue of all but the most important physical cues. I&#039;ll take a gander and tweak it – if it&#039;s not working, it&#039;s not working – but it will still be stylistically similar to what it was.<br /><br />What are your thoughts on the matter?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;d also say to take a look at how often you use direct address in this conversation//</span><br />Yeah. . . . Along with &quot;a moment later&quot; and &quot;well&quot; and &quot;a little&quot;, this is one of the barnacles that clings to my prose. I&#039;ll cut and clean.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And it&#039;s like you forgot Apple Bloom was even there so far//</span><br />Arguably, this is the same as the &quot;more gesture and setting&quot; advice, because she is there, but I haven&#039;t dedicated space to reminding a reader of that.<br /><br />And I have to ask, is it necessary? I can slip in a few pointers every now and then, but I&#039;m concerned about weakening the focus of the scene. I feel that once it&#039;s established that she is there, a reader doesn&#039;t need to be reminded. But that might just be faulty thinking on my part.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nothing about her bow?/</span><br />I figure she takes it off to sleep, just as Applejack, later, takes off her hair ties.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Well, now I&#039;m a bit confused. //</span><br />Yeah, I thought at the time that the mechanics of the spell might confuse some people. In my mind, it&#039;s a slightly elastic barrier attached to the perimeter of the room that prevents matter from crossing. But because it is slightly elastic, it can still transfer vibrations. So AJ can still hear what&#039;s happening inside, albeit slightly distorted, and she can still see in.<br /><br />I might have to tweak that a little, but it&#039;s difficult seeing as AJ isn&#039;t the sort to focus too much on the technical side of magic. That&#039;s more Twilight&#039;s schtick. Still, I suppose I could have her recount something &quot;Twi&quot; said.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t see what the purpose is in declaring this to be a direct thought//</span><br />Well, this was originally narration, but before I published it to FiMFiction, I had to go through and italicise the direct thoughts (because italics in Word don&#039;t translate to italics in FiMFic). I was a little trigger happy with the italics button<br /><br />But, also, I&#039;m not that well versed in narration-thought versus direct-thought. I thought it was more a matter of preference or style. Like how in &quot;I am Legend&quot;, all the thoughts are not italicised, despite being direct thoughts, because of the style of that time.<br /><br />Could you explain the difference, please, or at least help me understand it better? Cheers.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;why go for the substitute?//</span><br />I read a humble little book once by the name of &quot;A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius&quot;. The author, aptly enough, <i>is</i> something of a linguistic genius, and when a character&#039;s line of thought derailed, he used a long dash, longer than an em dash, followed by a tab to indicate it. I was trying to replicate the same here. A bit of borrowing, I guess.<br /><br />Would it be worth emphasising that, or just scrapping it and going for the &#039;em&#039;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but almost nobody in the fandom seems to care//</span><br />And neither do I!<br /><br />. . . <br /><br />But really, what do they have then? Hair? Maybe &#039;pelt&#039; would be more suitable, because when you say &#039;hair&#039; we naturally think of the head, and that is definitely not what was going for.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That second comma is unnecessary.//</span><br />With this comma business, I&#039;ve learned to use comma&#039;s more as a tool to control rhythm than in the conventional by-the-rule sense. If it works, I&#039;d prefer to keep them, but if it&#039;s doing nothing for you, then I might as well scrape them off.<br /><br />Are there any instances when having that unnecessary comma there improves the sentence, do you think? In general, and in my story?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but it still has to feel like it&#039;s come to a close.//</span><br />Endings are one of my (many) weaknesses. I never know how exactly to end a story. Is there some place that you feel would be more natural to stop it? I&#039;ll chew through it myself and try figure it out, but it&#039;d be nice to know what is making it weak.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s a gimmick you were trying to employ//</span><br />Basically, it&#039;s a relic of the original. I threw it in to help build ambiguity and a bit of suspense. Also, I think that AJ would think more like that, think of her family by their relationship more than by their names. It seems, to me, more instinctual. &quot;My sister&quot; &quot;My brother&quot;. And the same would go for herself.<br /><br />Is it something that hurts the fic particularly, do you think? If so, I can change it; but I would prefer to keep it as is, in that respect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m a little mystified by Twilight&#039;s explanation of the treatment she&#039;s pursuing//</span><br />Ah, I thought I *had* mentioned her putting him into stasis. Like, he sleeps hard during the day, but awakens at sunset and sunrise to eat. I think there is a line to that effect in there somewhere.<br /><br />And I could throw in a line about what Twi is researching, but to me it doesn&#039;t seem like something AJ would particularly be bothered with. She cares about the effect, her brother getting better, and isn&#039;t caught up in the particulars. As long as Twi keeps her updated about how things are going, not *what* things are going on, she is happy. So in her mind, Twi&#039;s research is &quot;not bearing any fruit&quot;. <br /><br />tl;dr: because I don&#039;t see AJ being concerned with what the research is, and she is the perspective character.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Really, there&#039;s not a whole lot of stuff to fix here, just some things that need tweaking.//</span><br />And tweak I shall!<br /><br />Seriously, thanks for all the advice. I have only got a single comment since I posted this story, and it wasn&#039;t particularly enlightening. So having all this feedback is a godsend. Thank you :)<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 346

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The sounds of the fire was music to Cheerilee’s ears.//

Number disagreement: sounds -> was

>a warm feeling of security and comfort//

The beginning of a story is a bad time to be telly. Focus on how this feels to her. There can be a physical warmth, but give me a couple of images that float through her mind as a result of feeling this way. Examples are much more powerful than summaries.

>shadows that bounced off of every able source//

"Available," right?

>room—projecting dark, dancing serenities every which way//

There's not a jump in train of thought or an interruption here. There's not really any call for a dash. A comma would be fine.

>The fieriness inside of her soul was rekindled by ashes and burnt logs—warm fur and a fluttery chest.//

Another unnecessary dash.

>ever loving//

Hyphenate. This is also getting pretty vague. Again, work with the imagery and sensations this brings to her.

>as it gave her another reason to close her eyes//

Fine point, but I wouldn't use a comma with this. There are two senses in which "as" can be used as a conjunction. Using a comma tends to create the feeling of "because," while going without one tends to connote "at the same time that."

>her bodily occurrences//

That's an awkward phrasing.

>given to her from herself//

Also somewhat awkwardly phrased.

>that only brought depressing thoughts to Cheerilee’s state of mind//

You just got through saying it was a joy. I could see it as ironic, but that she really enjoyed her smile and said it was a blessing. I'm getting really mixed messages here, and it's confusing.

>that gave her a reason not to make her lose her mind//

Why would she make herself lose her mind? I think there's some jumbled wording here that says something other than what you intended.

>Not a single malicious drop of the cold could touch her now.//

But you just had wintry gusts touching her fur. This is getting contradictory.

>in even worse condition//

Worse than what? She didn't say anything bad about this one.

>Forgotten Fables: Volume One, was a read that Cheerilee had been dying to get a hold of for a while.//

No reason for that comma.

>she took a liking in her job more multiple reasons//

I can't decipher this.

>The contents of the mug were still very near the top.//

Well, that's not entirely accurate, and it just sounds strange.

>With eyes as soft as the pillow propped against her//

This is limited narration in her perspective, but it's odd for her to describe her own eyes as soft. She can't see them, and it'd be an odd judgment for her to make anyway.

>she stared at the pages underneath//

Underneath what? And would that make them hard to see?

>as her orbs skimmed the vocabulary ever so daintily//

For one, "daintily" is another odd judgment for her to make about herself, but this is veering into thesaurus abuse.

>Cheerilee let out a small sigh, and absently reached for her hot chocolate.//

No need for that comma. It's all one clause.

>It took mere milliseconds for her to bring the edge of the mug up to her desperate lips.//

That's a pretty big exaggeration, and it doesn't fit the mood to make one like that.

>She could feel it light her inside aflame, making her feel an even more apparent sense of warmth. She didn’t even turn her head from her book when she set her drink back on the end table.//

Watch the close repetition of "feel" and "even."

>It was all ruined when three soft rasps came from her front door.//

I have to assume you meant "raps," as a rasp would be a really weird sound for this.

>For the first time in a while//

This indentation is off. There are probably others.

>multiple times with each movement causing her mane to slightly shift out of place.//

I don't know what that first part means, and what relevance does her mane have here? It has no bearing on the plot, and she apparently has no feelings about it one way or the other. So why mention it?

>She didn’t wish to get up, and destroy the ultimate comfort that she had spent the entire night trying to achieve.//

Unnecessary comma. I won't mark any more of these. There's a discussion on comma use with conjunctions in the resources at the top of this thread that should explain it.

>near perfect//

Hyphenate.

>a few snowflakes previous above the door//

Typo.

>visibly disheveled and tousled//

As opposed to invisibly disheveled and tousled?

>It looks like she washed her hair with something that was most certainly not shampoo.//

Verb tense.

>upon closer look//

Odd phrasing.

>sis//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>back to scratch the back//

Repetition.

>Cheerilee’s pursed her lips//

Typo.

>her breath vapor//

Odd phrasing.

>C-Can//

Unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway, you only capitalize the first part of a stutter at the beginning of a sentence.

>Her blanket, book, and hot chocolate was pleading for her return//

Subject/verb number agreement.

>The teacher bit her bottom lip, irritatingly.//

This doesn't say Cheerilee was irritated. It says the way she bit her lip was irritating to someone else, but we're in her perspective, and we get no evidence of such.

>She had missed the intoxicated grin that adorned Berry Punch’s face.//

Do you mean she failed to notice it or that she was nostalgic for it? If the former, then how can the narrator, essentially Cheerilee herself, notice?

>Flipping the it open//

Typo.

>towards in its direction//

Typo, and odd phrasing anyway.

>Cheerilee didn't like that sound, at all.//

Why not? As stated, it's only a sterile fact. Make me feel that way with her through her reaction to it.

>Berry hiccupped,//

You don't need the end punctuation for an aside like this unless it's a question mark or exclamation mark.

>she wiggled a little bit, fixing her slouching posture.//

That's not a dialogue attribution.

>unwilling being brought forth//

Typo. And this would mean a lot more if I got to see a few of them.

>was slowly begin//

Typo.

>friends house//

Typo.

>Not even a second later, turned back to her sister.//

Missing word.

>As rude and uncharacteristic of her as it was, her beliefs and emotions were justified in her own mind.//

Odd sentiment, at least for how it's worded, for Cheerilee to have about herself.

>but.. I’ve//

Needs another dot.

>she let out a small groan//

Capitalization.

>What I’ve been putting everyone though.//

She keeps saying this. Which, I guess, is reasonable for a drunk person, but writing is where realism clashes with the need to entertain as well, and unless you make the repetition create an effect, it just looks like an oversight.

>a tinge of disappointment//

There's a decent amount of this type of language in the story, which directly informs me of a character's emotion. There's a discussion on show versus tell at the top of this thread. It briefly goes through the rationale of how to do this more subtly.

>Cheerilee knit her brow.//

For the transitive meaning, the proper past is "knitted."

>clear headed//

Hyphenate.

>hers’//

Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>there’s//

Same, and you've confused the spelling anyway.

>I believe you, sis.//

Look how often they use direct address in this conversation. Then consider how often you actually do when you talk to someone.

>tears of her face//

Odd phrasing.

>ice cold//

Hyphenate.

>There was only a quarter of liquor left.//

Wording is off. And wine isn't generally considered liquor.

>Cheerilee’s reached out//

Cheerilee's what?

>every able part of her was covered and warmed//

What does "able" have to do with it?

>Literally//

I don't know why it's necessary to use this word. I have no reason to doubt the narrator.

Really this needs a good editing sweep to root out all the strange phrasings and mechanical problems. Aside from being a little overblown at times, Cheerilee's side of the story is nice, but Berry's is pretty generic. It doesn't do much to stand out from all of the other Berry Punch intervention fics out there. She just says she's sorry for what she put everyone through, and there are very few anecdotal references to things that might characterize their relationship so that I know what's at stake, beyond the standard sympathy the situation gets. The bit about the three-squeeze hug and their mother being surprised Berry was still alive were definitely the high points in that regard. This story could use a lot more material like that, as it's what really connects me to the characters and engages me in their struggle. And that's how you make a memorable story.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sounds of the fire was music to Cheerilee’s ears.//</span><br />Number disagreement: sounds -&gt; was<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a warm feeling of security and comfort//</span><br />The beginning of a story is a bad time to be telly. Focus on how this feels to her. There can be a physical warmth, but give me a couple of images that float through her mind as a result of feeling this way. Examples are much more powerful than summaries.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shadows that bounced off of every able source//</span><br />&quot;Available,&quot; right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;room—projecting dark, dancing serenities every which way//</span><br />There&#039;s not a jump in train of thought or an interruption here. There&#039;s not really any call for a dash. A comma would be fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The fieriness inside of her soul was rekindled by ashes and burnt logs—warm fur and a fluttery chest.//</span><br />Another unnecessary dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ever loving//</span><br />Hyphenate. This is also getting pretty vague. Again, work with the imagery and sensations this brings to her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as it gave her another reason to close her eyes//</span><br />Fine point, but I wouldn&#039;t use a comma with this. There are two senses in which &quot;as&quot; can be used as a conjunction. Using a comma tends to create the feeling of &quot;because,&quot; while going without one tends to connote &quot;at the same time that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her bodily occurrences//</span><br />That&#039;s an awkward phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;given to her from herself//</span><br />Also somewhat awkwardly phrased.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that only brought depressing thoughts to Cheerilee’s state of mind//</span><br />You just got through saying it was a joy. I could see it as ironic, but that she really enjoyed her smile and said it was a blessing. I&#039;m getting really mixed messages here, and it&#039;s confusing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;that gave her a reason not to make her lose her mind//</span><br />Why would she make herself lose her mind? I think there&#039;s some jumbled wording here that says something other than what you intended.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not a single malicious drop of the cold could touch her now.//</span><br />But you just had wintry gusts touching her fur. This is getting contradictory.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in even worse condition//</span><br />Worse than what? She didn&#039;t say anything bad about this one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<span style="border-bottom: 1px solid">Forgotten Fables: Volume One</span>, was a read that Cheerilee had been dying to get a hold of for a while.//</span><br />No reason for that comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she took a liking in her job more multiple reasons//</span><br />I can&#039;t decipher this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The contents of the mug were still very near the top.//</span><br />Well, that&#039;s not entirely accurate, and it just sounds strange.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;With eyes as soft as the pillow propped against her//</span><br />This is limited narration in her perspective, but it&#039;s odd for her to describe her own eyes as soft. She can&#039;t see them, and it&#039;d be an odd judgment for her to make anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she stared at the pages underneath//</span><br />Underneath what? And would that make them hard to see?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as her orbs skimmed the vocabulary ever so daintily//</span><br />For one, &quot;daintily&quot; is another odd judgment for her to make about herself, but this is veering into thesaurus abuse.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee let out a small sigh, and absently reached for her hot chocolate.//</span><br />No need for that comma. It&#039;s all one clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It took mere milliseconds for her to bring the edge of the mug up to her desperate lips.//</span><br />That&#039;s a pretty big exaggeration, and it doesn&#039;t fit the mood to make one like that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She could feel it light her inside aflame, making her feel an even more apparent sense of warmth. She didn’t even turn her head from her book when she set her drink back on the end table.//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of &quot;feel&quot; and &quot;even.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was all ruined when three soft rasps came from her front door.//</span><br />I have to assume you meant &quot;raps,&quot; as a rasp would be a really weird sound for this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For the first time in a while//</span><br />This indentation is off. There are probably others.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;multiple times with each movement causing her mane to slightly shift out of place.//</span><br />I don&#039;t know what that first part means, and what relevance does her mane have here? It has no bearing on the plot, and she apparently has no feelings about it one way or the other. So why mention it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She didn’t wish to get up, and destroy the ultimate comfort that she had spent the entire night trying to achieve.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma. I won&#039;t mark any more of these. There&#039;s a discussion on comma use with conjunctions in the resources at the top of this thread that should explain it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;near perfect//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a few snowflakes previous above the door//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;visibly disheveled and tousled//</span><br />As opposed to invisibly disheveled and tousled?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It looks like she washed her hair with something that was most certainly not shampoo.//</span><br />Verb tense.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;upon closer look//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;sis//</span><br />As a term of address, this would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;back to scratch the back//</span><br />Repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee’s pursed her lips//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her breath vapor//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;C-Can//</span><br />Unless it&#039;s something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway, you only capitalize the first part of a stutter at the beginning of a sentence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her blanket, book, and hot chocolate was pleading for her return//</span><br />Subject/verb number agreement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The teacher bit her bottom lip, irritatingly.//</span><br />This doesn&#039;t say Cheerilee was irritated. It says the way she bit her lip was irritating to someone else, but we&#039;re in her perspective, and we get no evidence of such.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She had missed the intoxicated grin that adorned Berry Punch’s face.//</span><br />Do you mean she failed to notice it or that she was nostalgic for it? If the former, then how can the narrator, essentially Cheerilee herself, notice?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Flipping the it open//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;towards in its direction//</span><br />Typo, and odd phrasing anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee didn&#039;t like that sound, at all.//</span><br />Why not? As stated, it&#039;s only a sterile fact. Make me feel that way with her through her reaction to it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Berry hiccupped,//</span><br />You don&#039;t need the end punctuation for an aside like this unless it&#039;s a question mark or exclamation mark.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she wiggled a little bit, fixing her slouching posture.//</span><br />That&#039;s not a dialogue attribution.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;unwilling being brought forth//</span><br />Typo. And this would mean a lot more if I got to see a few of them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was slowly begin//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;friends house//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not even a second later, turned back to her sister.//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;As rude and uncharacteristic of her as it was, her beliefs and emotions were justified in her own mind.//</span><br />Odd sentiment, at least for how it&#039;s worded, for Cheerilee to have about herself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but.. I’ve//</span><br />Needs another dot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she let out a small groan//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What I’ve been putting everyone though.//</span><br />She keeps saying this. Which, I guess, is reasonable for a drunk person, but writing is where realism clashes with the need to entertain as well, and unless you make the repetition create an effect, it just looks like an oversight.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a tinge of disappointment//</span><br />There&#039;s a decent amount of this type of language in the story, which directly informs me of a character&#039;s emotion. There&#039;s a discussion on show versus tell at the top of this thread. It briefly goes through the rationale of how to do this more subtly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee knit her brow.//</span><br />For the transitive meaning, the proper past is &quot;knitted.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;clear headed//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hers’//</span><br />Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;there’s//</span><br />Same, and you&#039;ve confused the spelling anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I believe you, sis.//</span><br />Look how often they use direct address in this conversation. Then consider how often you actually do when you talk to someone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;tears of her face//</span><br />Odd phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ice cold//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was only a quarter of liquor left.//</span><br />Wording is off. And wine isn&#039;t generally considered liquor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cheerilee’s reached out//</span><br />Cheerilee&#039;s what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;every able part of her was covered and warmed//</span><br />What does &quot;able&quot; have to do with it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Literally//</span><br />I don&#039;t know why it&#039;s necessary to use this word. I have no reason to doubt the narrator.<br /><br />Really this needs a good editing sweep to root out all the strange phrasings and mechanical problems. Aside from being a little overblown at times, Cheerilee&#039;s side of the story is nice, but Berry&#039;s is pretty generic. It doesn&#039;t do much to stand out from all of the other Berry Punch intervention fics out there. She just says she&#039;s sorry for what she put everyone through, and there are very few anecdotal references to things that might characterize their relationship so that I know what&#039;s at stake, beyond the standard sympathy the situation gets. The bit about the three-squeeze hug and their mother being surprised Berry was still alive were definitely the high points in that regard. This story could use a lot more material like that, as it&#039;s what really connects me to the characters and engages me in their struggle. And that&#039;s how you make a memorable story.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 347

>>132093
>Gesture and setting are an important part of dialogue, but the tone I'd set for the story was fairly stripped back up until this point, and so I tried to continue that by stripping my dialogue of all but the most important physical cues.
If it were a short conversation, it wouldn't be much of an issue, but it does add a healthy touch of realism. When you're talking to a friend, do you notice him gesturing with his hands? Do you notice what face he makes in response to what you said? You want the reader's experience to mirror what real life would be like as much as possible. And just like a stock portfolio, diversification is key, in this case, diversity in the means used to convey information. We call this "talking heads," and certainly some readers are more sensitive to it than others. It wasn't horrible, or I would have mentioned it earlier, but it could use a bit more.

>And I have to ask, is it necessary?

Maybe? All I can say is that it bothered me. You made a point of having Apple Bloom there, and then I kept wondering when it was going to matter that she was. As much as AJ tries to take on the burden of the situation because of how it's affecting the rest of the family, it seems like she'd notice how Apple Bloom was reacting to the argument with Granny Smith, even if Apple Bloom keeps quiet.

>I figure she takes it off to sleep, just as Applejack, later, takes off her hair ties.

Could be. Though in "Somepony to Watch over Me," Sweetie Belle wears the bow as a disguise, and AJ wasn't surprised by it. She has it on during their sleepovers, too, in "One Bad Seed" and "The Stare Master."

>Could you explain the difference, please, or at least help me understand it better?

Well, it goes to the differences in narrative voices. An omniscient narrator has to present thoughts as quoted (or italicized). A first-person narrator has to present them as narration, unless he wants to quote himself for effect, but that'd be rare. A limited narrator can do either, though it's often best to stick to one or the other, and between the two, narrated thought is the better way to connect with the reader, since it speaks directly to him and often strikes a more personable, conversational tone. The main reasons to use quoted thought in a limited narration would be if you wanted to make sure the reader knew the thought happened exactly that way, word for word. For example, maybe it's a phrase that turns up throughout the story for thematic effect. The other would be if you needed to phrase it with "I" or "you," which a third-person narrator shouldn't do. For example, there may be a compelling reason to say:
I need to do this.
versus:
She needed to do this.

There can be a fine line of which one carries power better, but it's really only at crucial moments that it's worth making the distinction. Mainly, it's that by using quoted thought, you're having the narrator take a half-step back from the reader, yet having that close connection is the appeal of having a limited narrator in the first place.

>Would it be worth emphasising that, or just scrapping it and going for the 'em'?

It's not a point worth arguing over, really. But I didn't know to read anything into your choice of having extra hyphens there, and I can't imagine any other readers will, either.

>But really, what do they have then? Hair?/

Techincally, yes, it's hair, though "coat" is a nice catch-all term that many writers seem to like. You can get a little more descriptive than any of the three, too, if you like.

>Are there any instances when having that unnecessary comma there improves the sentence, do you think? In general, and in my story?

Yes, there are times an unnecessary comma works for helping flow or organization. You had some that didn't bother me because I thought they were justified. Any I specifically marked were places where I didn't feel a pause there, but there's certainly leeway to be given. You just have to be careful for situations where putting in an unnecessary comment actually changes the sense of what you're saying.

>Is there some place that you feel would be more natural to stop it?

For me, it's not that the story should have ended before it did or gone on to some subsequent events as much as it didn't make a point at the end. Is there a message about sacrifice or the importance of family that you want the reader to take away from the story? Then say something to that effect in the last paragraph. It just needs to feel like the plot is tied up at the end, which doesn't mean it can't be open-ended, just that it's made its point. For instance, we can still be left wondering whether AJ is infected, but that's not going to change her resolution about what she did, whether she's come to a peace that she did the right thing, whether she feels some character flaw has caused her to let her family down, or whatever you want the take-away to be.

>Is it something that hurts the fic particularly, do you think? If so, I can change it; but I would prefer to keep it as is, in that respect.

No, it was just more odd than anything. A limited narrator isn't her, but it almost is, and it's just rare to see one go without naming the character. AJ might not name herself, but she's not going to call herself "she," either. In any case, this one's not a big deal.

>Ah, I thought I *had* mentioned her putting him into stasis. Like, he sleeps hard during the day, but awakens at sunset and sunrise to eat. I think there is a line to that effect in there somewhere.

There was something about that in there, but why does he ever need to be awake? Keep him on sedatives, put him in an induced coma, whatever. They can feed him by IV, and then there's much less danger. Actually, given his condition, those efforts might fail anyway, but they couldn't have known that, and it seems like a wise precaution to at least consider.

>And I could throw in a line about what Twi is researching

It's not so much that AJ would be keeping up with the technical side of it, but it's hard to treat a patient in absentia, and the way Twilight's set it up, nobody else can. So for as long as this has been going on, she's never stopped by to see if the treatment is actually working, and then using that feedback to refine her approach if necessary? It just seems kind of irresponsible to lock him away and never check up on him again. She doesn't know what it is, so she has no idea whether it's something that takes along time to get over, but the obvious ones—disease, parasite, injury, etc.—often show significant changes within a few days. And if it turns out that it is something slow-acting, it's better to have checked on him more often than necessary than doing so not often enough.

Basically, I'm looking for a justification of why this has gone on so long, yet Twilight hasn't ever returned, particularly since those possibilities are all things that could have killed him by now if the treatment wasn't going well.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132093" onclick="return highlight('132093', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132093">&gt;&gt;132093</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Gesture and setting are an important part of dialogue, but the tone I&#039;d set for the story was fairly stripped back up until this point, and so I tried to continue that by stripping my dialogue of all but the most important physical cues.</span><br />If it were a short conversation, it wouldn&#039;t be much of an issue, but it does add a healthy touch of realism. When you&#039;re talking to a friend, do you notice him gesturing with his hands? Do you notice what face he makes in response to what you said? You want the reader&#039;s experience to mirror what real life would be like as much as possible. And just like a stock portfolio, diversification is key, in this case, diversity in the means used to convey information. We call this &quot;talking heads,&quot; and certainly some readers are more sensitive to it than others. It wasn&#039;t horrible, or I would have mentioned it earlier, but it could use a bit more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And I have to ask, is it necessary?</span><br />Maybe? All I can say is that it bothered me. You made a point of having Apple Bloom there, and then I kept wondering when it was going to matter that she was. As much as AJ tries to take on the burden of the situation because of how it&#039;s affecting the rest of the family, it seems like she&#039;d notice how Apple Bloom was reacting to the argument with Granny Smith, even if Apple Bloom keeps quiet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I figure she takes it off to sleep, just as Applejack, later, takes off her hair ties.</span><br />Could be. Though in &quot;Somepony to Watch over Me,&quot; Sweetie Belle wears the bow as a disguise, and AJ wasn&#039;t surprised by it. She has it on during their sleepovers, too, in &quot;One Bad Seed&quot; and &quot;The Stare Master.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Could you explain the difference, please, or at least help me understand it better?</span><br />Well, it goes to the differences in narrative voices. An omniscient narrator has to present thoughts as quoted (or italicized). A first-person narrator has to present them as narration, unless he wants to quote himself for effect, but that&#039;d be rare. A limited narrator can do either, though it&#039;s often best to stick to one or the other, and between the two, narrated thought is the better way to connect with the reader, since it speaks directly to him and often strikes a more personable, conversational tone. The main reasons to use quoted thought in a limited narration would be if you wanted to make sure the reader knew the thought happened exactly that way, word for word. For example, maybe it&#039;s a phrase that turns up throughout the story for thematic effect. The other would be if you needed to phrase it with &quot;I&quot; or &quot;you,&quot; which a third-person narrator shouldn&#039;t do. For example, there may be a compelling reason to say:<br /><i>I need to do this.</i><br />versus:<br />She needed to do this.<br /><br />There can be a fine line of which one carries power better, but it&#039;s really only at crucial moments that it&#039;s worth making the distinction. Mainly, it&#039;s that by using quoted thought, you&#039;re having the narrator take a half-step back from the reader, yet having that close connection is the appeal of having a limited narrator in the first place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Would it be worth emphasising that, or just scrapping it and going for the &#039;em&#039;?</span><br />It&#039;s not a point worth arguing over, really. But I didn&#039;t know to read anything into your choice of having extra hyphens there, and I can&#039;t imagine any other readers will, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But really, what do they have then? Hair?/</span><br />Techincally, yes, it&#039;s hair, though &quot;coat&quot; is a nice catch-all term that many writers seem to like. You can get a little more descriptive than any of the three, too, if you like.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Are there any instances when having that unnecessary comma there improves the sentence, do you think? In general, and in my story?</span><br />Yes, there are times an unnecessary comma works for helping flow or organization. You had some that didn&#039;t bother me because I thought they were justified. Any I specifically marked were places where I didn&#039;t feel a pause there, but there&#039;s certainly leeway to be given. You just have to be careful for situations where putting in an unnecessary comment actually changes the sense of what you&#039;re saying.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Is there some place that you feel would be more natural to stop it?</span><br />For me, it&#039;s not that the story should have ended before it did or gone on to some subsequent events as much as it didn&#039;t make a point at the end. Is there a message about sacrifice or the importance of family that you want the reader to take away from the story? Then say something to that effect in the last paragraph. It just needs to feel like the plot is tied up at the end, which doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be open-ended, just that it&#039;s made its point. For instance, we can still be left wondering whether AJ is infected, but that&#039;s not going to change her resolution about what she did, whether she&#039;s come to a peace that she did the right thing, whether she feels some character flaw has caused her to let her family down, or whatever you want the take-away to be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Is it something that hurts the fic particularly, do you think? If so, I can change it; but I would prefer to keep it as is, in that respect.</span><br />No, it was just more odd than anything. A limited narrator isn&#039;t her, but it <i>almost</i> is, and it&#039;s just rare to see one go without naming the character. AJ might not name herself, but she&#039;s not going to call herself &quot;she,&quot; either. In any case, this one&#039;s not a big deal.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ah, I thought I *had* mentioned her putting him into stasis. Like, he sleeps hard during the day, but awakens at sunset and sunrise to eat. I think there is a line to that effect in there somewhere.</span><br />There was something about that in there, but why does he <i>ever</i> need to be awake? Keep him on sedatives, put him in an induced coma, whatever. They can feed him by IV, and then there&#039;s much less danger. Actually, given his condition, those efforts might fail anyway, but they couldn&#039;t have known that, and it seems like a wise precaution to at least consider.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;And I could throw in a line about what Twi is researching</span><br />It&#039;s not so much that AJ would be keeping up with the technical side of it, but it&#039;s hard to treat a patient in absentia, and the way Twilight&#039;s set it up, nobody else can. So for as long as this has been going on, she&#039;s never stopped by to see if the treatment is actually working, and then using that feedback to refine her approach if necessary? It just seems kind of irresponsible to lock him away and never check up on him again. She doesn&#039;t know what it is, so she has no idea whether it&#039;s something that takes along time to get over, but the obvious ones—disease, parasite, injury, etc.—often show significant changes within a few days. And if it turns out that it <i>is</i> something slow-acting, it&#039;s better to have checked on him more often than necessary than doing so not often enough.<br /><br />Basically, I&#039;m looking for a justification of why this has gone on so long, yet Twilight hasn&#039;t ever returned, particularly since those possibilities are all things that could have killed him by now if the treatment wasn&#039;t going well.<br />

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 348

>>132099

>Yes, there are times an unnecessary comma works for helping flow or organization.//


Find and replace is a wonderful tool. I've replaced the ", and" instances where it seems erroneous, but I've left a few where I think they work to good effect.

>They can feed him by IV//

But IV bags need to be changed, which means someone would need to enter the room, which defeats the point of sealing the room.

I'll tweak it, but any solid fix would cause such a mess that it would detract from the story.

>It just seems kind of irresponsible to lock him away and never check up on him again//


Hm. Okay. I can see what you mean, and I think I can tweak the line where Apple Bloom asks Applejack if she has read the letter. I should be able to slip in some explanation.

Thanks for the catch.

>We call this "talking heads,"//


Okay, yeah. If it isn't clear, it's not clear. I'll go through and drop a few more physical cues to help illustrate the scene.

>she'd notice how Apple Bloom was reacting to the argument with Granny Smith, even if Apple Bloom keeps quiet.//


Hm. Yeah, okay, I concede this. I don't think she *has* to play a large role, but I have underused her – especially since her reactions could slap some emotional flesh onto that skeleton of a scene.



Again, thanks for the feedback. I should have a modified version of the story ready by tonight :)<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132099" onclick="return highlight('132099', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132099">&gt;&gt;132099</a><br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Yes, there are times an unnecessary comma works for helping flow or organization.//</span><br /><br />Find and replace is a wonderful tool. I&#039;ve replaced the &quot;, and&quot; instances where it seems erroneous, but I&#039;ve left a few where I think they work to good effect.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They can feed him by IV//</span><br />But IV bags need to be changed, which means someone would need to enter the room, which defeats the point of sealing the room.<br /><br />I&#039;ll tweak it, but any solid fix would cause such a mess that it would detract from the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It just seems kind of irresponsible to lock him away and never check up on him again//</span><br /><br />Hm. Okay. I can see what you mean, and I think I can tweak the line where Apple Bloom asks Applejack if she has read the letter. I should be able to slip in some explanation. <br /><br />Thanks for the catch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We call this &quot;talking heads,&quot;//</span><br /><br />Okay, yeah. If it isn&#039;t clear, it&#039;s not clear. I&#039;ll go through and drop a few more physical cues to help illustrate the scene.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she&#039;d notice how Apple Bloom was reacting to the argument with Granny Smith, even if Apple Bloom keeps quiet.//</span><br /><br />Hm. Yeah, okay, I concede this. I don&#039;t think she *has* to play a large role, but I have underused her – especially since her reactions could slap some emotional flesh onto that skeleton of a scene.<br /><br />—<br /><br />Again, thanks for the feedback. I should have a modified version of the story ready by tonight :)<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 349

>>132100
>But IV bags need to be changed, which means someone would need to enter the room, which defeats the point of sealing the room.
That's kind of my point. If they'd incapacitated him through something like sedation, then he wouldn't be dangerous, plus he wouldn't need to wake up to eat, thus he'd get even more rest. So I'm not sure why Twilight goes for the setup she does. However, there is a little inkling in there that she knows more than she's letting on. It makes me wonder if she knew what long odds they faced.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132100" onclick="return highlight('132100', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132100">&gt;&gt;132100</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But IV bags need to be changed, which means someone would need to enter the room, which defeats the point of sealing the room.</span><br />That&#039;s kind of my point. If they&#039;d incapacitated him through something like sedation, then he wouldn&#039;t be dangerous, plus he wouldn&#039;t need to wake up to eat, thus he&#039;d get even more rest. So I&#039;m not sure why Twilight goes for the setup she does. However, there is a little inkling in there that she knows more than she&#039;s letting on. It makes me wonder if she knew what long odds they faced.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 350

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I haven't talked to you in a while and that was a mistake. Today was bad, and I return to you broken, humiliated, and with no future.//

Look at the difference between these two sentences in how the comma is used with the conjunction between clauses. The secnd one is correct. There is some leeway for flow, but in general, if a conjunction is just separating two items of a compound structure, you don't need the comma, but if it separates clauses (each with its own subject and verb), you do. This is an issue throughout the story. Insofar as this is Sunset's writing, I can buy that it's her mistake and not yours, but that only works to a point. Then it becomes an excuse. There's a little more on this comma guideline at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

>I started lashing out at others, pushing them away.//

There are some conventions of good writing that get relaxed for first-person narrators. For instance, this narrator can use more telly language than might be preferred. But this rule really doesn't have exceptions: examples speak far louder than generalities. Give me a couple of anecdotes here, maybe two or three one-sentence summaries of times she did this, and it makes it so much more real. It connects the character to the reader better.

>They hadn't dedicated their lives to the elements, obsessed over them, the ponies that represent the elements didn’t even try to manifest them.//

Feels like you're missing a comma. If not, there's some jumbled wording.

>So every time I saw them at school, I only felt hate, it ate at me until I drove them apart with tricks and lies.//

That last comma is a splice, and again, an example or two here would really add some flavor.

>massivly//

Typo.

>element of magic//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing these titles. You'll have to sweep for them.

So a side note on this chapter. I think you could stand to go through the movie summary more quickly. For someone who hasn't seen it, there are only a few points they'd need to be aware of to get what happened, and you're spending quite a bit of your time rehashing events many readers, particularly those who choose to read about Sunset Shimmer, will already know. This is supposed to be your hook where you grab the reader's interest. Don't tell him a bunch of things he's seen before.

>Dear Lord//

Given all the similar expressions of sun worship she's used, I'm really surprised to hear her say this. I'm not even sure what it'd mean in the context of this universe.

>the most pleasurable feeling that I can’t even describe it//

Give it a shot, at least. If she fumbles for words, fine, but a but of imagery for the intangible part and some reference to the physical symptoms of how it felt would make this more meaningful.

>near infinite//

Hyphenate.

>in it’s absence//

Its/it's confusion. This is a common enough mistake that you should sweep for it. I'll waste too much time if I end up marking every instance I see. Basically, if you're talking about ownership, you don't use an apostrophe (possessive pronounds, like "his," never have apostrophes). If you mean it as a contraction of "it is" or "it has," then it does use an apostrophe.

>helpless and alone//

Sell this with some imagery.

>Speaking of Flash//

Most times, you'll set off a participle with a comma.

>who really went out of the way to help me//

Out of his way

>I didn’t realized//

Typo. And good work through here. These little touches on what they did, a couple of dates, him showing her how to play guitar, they really add flavor and authenticity to the relationship so that it seems real, not just something you expect me to believe.

>Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing.//

Typo.

>is//

Assuming that she's writing this out by hand, it's not really feasible to write in italics. Most often, people will emphasize something they've written by underlining it or making it darker or in all capital letters.

>After I was defeated//

Comma after the dependent clause.

>I was assigned I had to repair some damage//

Seems like you changed your mind about what to say and forgot to erase some.

>I hate Mondays//

Same issues with the italics. Just keep this in mind through the rest of the story. I won't mark any more.

>I can’t risk anymore screwups.//

You're not using it as an adverb, so "any more" needs to be two words.

So my thoughts at the end of the prologue:

It seems odd to call it that. It's a legitimate diary entry. It's not something she wrote for the purposes of setting up the rest (though that was your purpose), since she didn't know yet what the rest was. You might reconsider calling it that.

Some readers skim prologues or skip them altogether, because they want to get to the good stuff. That might be another good reason the change it, but that also depends on what you want to do with it. I've already said that having so much exposition of things many readers will already know isn't going to help draw interest very well. I see that someone in the comments had the same problem with it. So if you really want to call it a prologue, it might get some of the fussier readers to skip it and get into the meat of the story, and while that does mean they'd be missing some good writing and characterization, they wouldn't be missing anything they need to know. And a nonessential chapter isn't a good thing. You do fine when you're focusing on Sunset's emotional response to what happened, and really, you could cut the chapter to just drop that—leave out the exposition of canon events, but keep her reaction to the aftermath, her recounting of what came before the movie, and the little anecdotal pieces that get us in her head.

Last bit before we move on: many readers know what an epistolary story is, even if they don't know the proper term for it. It becomes immediately apparent that this story is one, so it feels really heavy-handed for you to explain it in depth in your synopsis, or, frankly, for you to explain it at all. Readers don't like feeling as if they're being talked down to, and it's an immersion-breaking speed bump between the story summary and the actual story. I'd suggest losing it, or at least moving it to an author's note at the end.

>Day 2 of being a betterpony//

Missing space

>I don’t want to laugh while those I’ve already hurt die around me.//

This entry feels like she's holding back, but maybe you didn't intend it that way. I don't see a reason why she would. She's in utter turmoil here, and yet the word choice and phrasing don't really reflect that. Though her actions show one thing, she sounds pretty calm.

>When I woke up my trailer//

You need a comma for the dependent clause, or it sounds like Sunset woke her trailer up.

>waste//

Might need smoe clarification. I think you mean garbage, but you might mean someone took a dump on her doorstep.

>Mayonnaise//

Why is this capitalized?

>business oriented//

Hyphenate.

>I think I’d like that//

Missing end punctuation.

It's striking me as odd that the daily entries are labeled "being a better pony," so she must have written that herself, right? And yet she's not actively doing anything to make herself better, just wallowing in self-pity and withdrawing from everything. You might want to change some of the heading s to reflect her attitude better (easier option) or add in some of her actually trying to improve already (tougher option).

>It made me kind of nervous. I especially needed to be accepted by the school heroes.//

This seems kind of blunt, not necessarily for a diary, but for something I'm reading for entertainment. It could use some more personal impact. Like instead of "It made me kind of nervous," try something like "Why would they even come here? I doubt they'd try their hand at tossing some eggs, too, but maybe they just wanted to yell at me. I nearly slammed the door and ran back inside."

>Not just because they held the greatest sway over my future//

Well, I'm not so certain about this. Yes, in terms of helping her mold her personality (if she even believes that yet, but not in terms of being important people at school. They were never portrayed as people who exerted much social influence. Eh, maybe Dash. But they didn't even in the second movie, after they'd won the day.

>But Pinkie Pie didn’t seem to mind and gave me a big hug.//

Wouldn't this surprise her a lot?

>these past few year//

Typo.

>On one hoof hand//

She's been there for years already and mocked Twilight for not being able to assimilate quickly. I doubt she'd make this kind of mistake.

>By the time I had gotten showered, brushed my teeth, and dressed//

Comma after the dependent clause.

>trashcan//

trash can

>I was completely shocked at the effort these girls had put in//

Again, let the narrative voice carry this emotion. This is more how you have to do showing in first-person. She's not going to talk about her own facial expression and posture like a third-person narrator could, but you can still imply emotion through what she says as the narrato and how she says it. "Why? Why would they do that for me? I must have stood there five minutes, staring at them like an idiot, before I remembered that the one thing I could do in return was to avoid making them late." Something like that. You go on to cover some of this idea anyway, so this is just an example.

>after the hooligans had run rampant//

Watch your word choice. This sounds awfully formal and not at all like her. She's writing this in a very informal setting and for herself only, so it should sound very casual and off the cuff, not rehearsed and fancy. You don't want to lose that authenticity.

>I couldn’t even manage a thank you//

In this sense, use a hyphen with "thank-you."

>After fifteen minutes we made it to school, on time,//

That last comma is a splice.

>various degrees of hate, fear, and disgust meeting my gaze//

Give me a couple of examples of what they do. The tomato thing is nice, but let me see a little more. And the "meeting my gaze" is another example of a formal phrasing that sounds out of place for the format.

>I had no idea that she had it in her.//

Seems like she might use an exclamation point here, and if it truly surprised her, it probably warrants a little more mention than this.

>berating//

That's too unusual a verb to use twice in the same paragraph, let alone the same page, without there being some thematic reason for doing so, where the repetition itself carries some meaning.

>I’m not surprised Rainbow did, she’s the sports star and was right next to me.//

Comma splice. I'm starting to see more of these. They hadn't been a problem earlier.

>teachers desk//

Missing apostrophe.

>Then she’d turn to Applejack and said something//

Inconsistent verb forms.

>on it’s own//

Its/it's confusion.

>we were suppose to do//

Verb form.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I haven&#039;t talked to you in a while and that was a mistake. Today was bad, and I return to you broken, humiliated, and with no future.//</span><br />Look at the difference between these two sentences in how the comma is used with the conjunction between clauses. The secnd one is correct. There is some leeway for flow, but in general, if a conjunction is just separating two items of a compound structure, you don&#039;t need the comma, but if it separates clauses (each with its own subject and verb), you do. This is an issue throughout the story. Insofar as this is Sunset&#039;s writing, I can buy that it&#039;s her mistake and not yours, but that only works to a point. Then it becomes an excuse. There&#039;s a little more on this comma guideline at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I started lashing out at others, pushing them away.//</span><br />There are some conventions of good writing that get relaxed for first-person narrators. For instance, this narrator can use more telly language than might be preferred. But this rule really doesn&#039;t have exceptions: examples speak far louder than generalities. Give me a couple of anecdotes here, maybe two or three one-sentence summaries of times she did this, and it makes it so much more real. It connects the character to the reader better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They hadn&#039;t dedicated their lives to the elements, obsessed over them, the ponies that represent the elements didn’t even try to manifest them.//</span><br />Feels like you&#039;re missing a comma. If not, there&#039;s some jumbled wording.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So every time I saw them at school, I only felt hate, it ate at me until I drove them apart with tricks and lies.//</span><br />That last comma is a splice, and again, an example or two here would really add some flavor.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;massivly//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;element of magic//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at capitalizing these titles. You&#039;ll have to sweep for them.<br /><br />So a side note on this chapter. I think you could stand to go through the movie summary more quickly. For someone who hasn&#039;t seen it, there are only a few points they&#039;d need to be aware of to get what happened, and you&#039;re spending quite a bit of your time rehashing events many readers, particularly those who choose to read about Sunset Shimmer, will already know. This is supposed to be your hook where you grab the reader&#039;s interest. Don&#039;t tell him a bunch of things he&#039;s seen before.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dear Lord//</span><br />Given all the similar expressions of sun worship she&#039;s used, I&#039;m really surprised to hear her say this. I&#039;m not even sure what it&#039;d mean in the context of this universe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the most pleasurable feeling that I can’t even describe it//</span><br />Give it a shot, at least. If she fumbles for words, fine, but a but of imagery for the intangible part and some reference to the physical symptoms of how it felt would make this more meaningful.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;near infinite//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in it’s absence//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion. This is a common enough mistake that you should sweep for it. I&#039;ll waste too much time if I end up marking every instance I see. Basically, if you&#039;re talking about ownership, you don&#039;t use an apostrophe (possessive pronounds, like &quot;his,&quot; never have apostrophes). If you mean it as a contraction of &quot;it is&quot; or &quot;it has,&quot; then it does use an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;helpless and alone//</span><br />Sell this with some imagery.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Speaking of Flash//</span><br />Most times, you&#039;ll set off a participle with a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;who really went out of the way to help me//</span><br />Out of his way<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn’t realized//</span><br />Typo. And good work through here. These little touches on what they did, a couple of dates, him showing her how to play guitar, they really add flavor and authenticity to the relationship so that it seems real, not just something you expect me to believe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing.//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>is</i>//</span><br />Assuming that she&#039;s writing this out by hand, it&#039;s not really feasible to write in italics. Most often, people will emphasize something they&#039;ve written by underlining it or making it darker or in all capital letters.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After I was defeated//</span><br />Comma after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was assigned I had to repair some damage//</span><br />Seems like you changed your mind about what to say and forgot to erase some.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>I hate Mondays</i>//</span><br />Same issues with the italics. Just keep this in mind through the rest of the story. I won&#039;t mark any more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can’t risk anymore screwups.//</span><br />You&#039;re not using it as an adverb, so &quot;any more&quot; needs to be two words.<br /><br />So my thoughts at the end of the prologue:<br /><br />It seems odd to call it that. It&#039;s a legitimate diary entry. It&#039;s not something she wrote for the purposes of setting up the rest (though that was <i>your</i> purpose), since she didn&#039;t know yet what the rest was. You might reconsider calling it that.<br /><br />Some readers skim prologues or skip them altogether, because they want to get to the good stuff. That might be another good reason the change it, but that also depends on what you want to do with it. I&#039;ve already said that having so much exposition of things many readers will already know isn&#039;t going to help draw interest very well. I see that someone in the comments had the same problem with it. So if you really want to call it a prologue, it might get some of the fussier readers to skip it and get into the meat of the story, and while that does mean they&#039;d be missing some good writing and characterization, they wouldn&#039;t be missing anything they need to know. And a nonessential chapter isn&#039;t a good thing. You do fine when you&#039;re focusing on Sunset&#039;s emotional response to what happened, and really, you could cut the chapter to just drop that—leave out the exposition of canon events, but keep her reaction to the aftermath, her recounting of what came before the movie, and the little anecdotal pieces that get us in her head.<br /><br />Last bit before we move on: many readers know what an epistolary story is, even if they don&#039;t know the proper term for it. It becomes immediately apparent that this story is one, so it feels really heavy-handed for you to explain it in depth in your synopsis, or, frankly, for you to explain it at all. Readers don&#039;t like feeling as if they&#039;re being talked down to, and it&#039;s an immersion-breaking speed bump between the story summary and the actual story. I&#039;d suggest losing it, or at least moving it to an author&#039;s note at the end.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Day 2 of being a betterpony//</span><br />Missing space<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t want to laugh while those I’ve already hurt die around me.//</span><br />This entry feels like she&#039;s holding back, but maybe you didn&#039;t intend it that way. I don&#039;t see a reason why she would. She&#039;s in utter turmoil here, and yet the word choice and phrasing don&#039;t really reflect that. Though her actions show one thing, she sounds pretty calm.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;When I woke up my trailer//</span><br />You need a comma for the dependent clause, or it sounds like Sunset woke her trailer up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;waste//</span><br />Might need smoe clarification. I <i>think</i> you mean garbage, but you might mean someone took a dump on her doorstep.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Mayonnaise//</span><br />Why is this capitalized?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;business oriented//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I think I’d like that//</span><br />Missing end punctuation.<br /><br />It&#039;s striking me as odd that the daily entries are labeled &quot;being a better pony,&quot; so she must have written that herself, right? And yet she&#039;s not actively doing anything to make herself better, just wallowing in self-pity and withdrawing from everything. You might want to change some of the heading s to reflect her attitude better (easier option) or add in some of her actually trying to improve already (tougher option).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It made me kind of nervous. I especially needed to be accepted by the school heroes.//</span><br />This seems kind of blunt, not necessarily for a diary, but for something I&#039;m reading for entertainment. It could use some more personal impact. Like instead of &quot;It made me kind of nervous,&quot; try something like &quot;Why would they even come here? I doubt they&#039;d try their hand at tossing some eggs, too, but maybe they just wanted to yell at me. I nearly slammed the door and ran back inside.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not just because they held the greatest sway over my future//</span><br />Well, I&#039;m not so certain about this. Yes, in terms of helping her mold her personality (if she even believes that yet, but not in terms of being important people at school. They were never portrayed as people who exerted much social influence. Eh, maybe Dash. But they didn&#039;t even in the second movie, after they&#039;d won the day.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But Pinkie Pie didn’t seem to mind and gave me a big hug.//</span><br />Wouldn&#039;t this surprise her a lot?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;these past few year//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;On one <strike>hoof</strike> hand//</span><br />She&#039;s been there for years already and mocked Twilight for not being able to assimilate quickly. I doubt she&#039;d make this kind of mistake.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;By the time I had gotten showered, brushed my teeth, and dressed//</span><br />Comma after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;trashcan//</span><br />trash can<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was completely shocked at the effort these girls had put in//</span><br />Again, let the narrative voice carry this emotion. This is more how you have to do showing in first-person. She&#039;s not going to talk about her own facial expression and posture like a third-person narrator could, but you can still imply emotion through what she says as the narrato and how she says it. &quot;Why? Why would they do that for me? I must have stood there five minutes, staring at them like an idiot, before I remembered that the one thing I could do in return was to avoid making them late.&quot; Something like that. You go on to cover some of this idea anyway, so this is just an example.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after the hooligans had run rampant//</span><br />Watch your word choice. This sounds awfully formal and not at all like her. She&#039;s writing this in a very informal setting and for herself only, so it should sound very casual and off the cuff, not rehearsed and fancy. You don&#039;t want to lose that authenticity.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I couldn’t even manage a thank you//</span><br />In this sense, use a hyphen with &quot;thank-you.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After fifteen minutes we made it to school, on time,//</span><br />That last comma is a splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;various degrees of hate, fear, and disgust meeting my gaze//</span><br />Give me a couple of examples of what they do. The tomato thing is nice, but let me see a little more. And the &quot;meeting my gaze&quot; is another example of a formal phrasing that sounds out of place for the format.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I had no idea that she had it in her.//</span><br />Seems like she might use an exclamation point here, and if it truly surprised her, it probably warrants a little more mention than this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;berating//</span><br />That&#039;s too unusual a verb to use twice in the same paragraph, let alone the same page, without there being some thematic reason for doing so, where the repetition itself carries some meaning.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m not surprised Rainbow did, she’s the sports star and was right next to me.//</span><br />Comma splice. I&#039;m starting to see more of these. They hadn&#039;t been a problem earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;teachers desk//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then she’d turn to Applejack and said something//</span><br />Inconsistent verb forms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on it’s own//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we were suppose to do//</span><br />Verb form.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 351

>Professor Snowflake//
It's a high school. They shouldn't have professors.

>falling bunny//

This is brilliant.

>best tasting//

Hyphenate.

>left me feeling happy about the conversation//

Focus more on the effects than summing it up as "happy." What physical sensations does it give her? How has her impression of Applejack changed?

>No telling what people would do with you, Dairy.//

She likes that milk, huh?

>Be it the tantalizing call of power//

Watch that unnatural formalism again.

>I’m suppose to//

Verb form.

>Goodnight//

Two words, and you're missing the end punctuation.

>The school has to be treating them as bad as me and they don’t have anyone helping them.//

You have a point there. They never suffered any ill effects for their involvement. People glared at Sunset but ignored Snips and Snails.

>still surprises me sometimes. Still//

Watch for repeating all but the most mundane of words that close together.

>I guess Rarity has a knack for details, no wonder her clothing always looks so professional.//

Comma splice.

>I knew he wasn’t happy to see me. I guess that’s why I haven't seen him.//

The phrasing here is pretty repetitive.

>Dammit, all to Hell.//

Unnecessary comma, and you haven't been capitalizing that. Incidentally, the use of all caps in this entry is far more appropriate than the use of italics in the prologue.

>There.

>
> I.
>
> Applejack, she//
First, I'm not sure why these are indented. Second, this is really a speech affectation, which doesn't translate into writing well. This is one of the few times that I think strikethroughs might be appropriate. In a letter, I hate seeing them, because the person writing the letter typically isn't in a hurry or has no reason why they can't just get a clean sheet of paper and start over. But a diary entry may well be written in a moment of passion, and she might not want to waste the finite number of pages by starting over. So I think they'd be justified here and more authentic at trying to get across what you want here.

>Snail//

Typo.

>they. They.//

Again, this isn't a writing affectation. It comes across as trying to imitate more how she'd say it, and it just doesn't work.

>I just cried until I fell asleep, I think.//

On her lawn? Or did they take her inside? Let me also warn you here against "piling on." It's a good idea to limit bad things to the minimum needed to make the plot work. When you load on a bunch more than is necessary, it cheapens the effect. Less is often more.

>when I ripped their souls from their bodies and consuming them//

Verb form inconsistency.

>phantom echoes of power to fulfill my every desire//

You're losing that feel of natural writing again. This sounds way too rehearsed.

>I don’t know how long I laid there.//

I haven't marked it, even though I've seen this same mistake before: lay/lie confusion. But she's a high school kid, and I bet she actually makes this mistake. Though if you want it to be correct, use "lay." "Laid" requires a direct object, so in past tense, you laid your head down, but you lay down.

>I instantly felt a mix of relief and embarrassment.//

Again, let the narrator carry this a bit without explicitly saying it. "Soomeone actually came to help, but did they know? Could they tell what I'd been thinking? I was sure they did, and I couldn't look at them until Pinkie hugged me and Fluttershy warned her she probably shouldn't move me and Rarity called an ambulance." Stuff like that. Get at the emotion a little indirectly.

Edit: wow, I wrote that before I read the next paragraph, and I got 2 of 3 dead on. Heh.

>at the same time their mere presence helped me stop clawing for that aetherial power that eluded me//

Sounding unnatural again.

>whom I wanted to crush, who I enjoyed splitting up//

Odd that she gets it right once and wrong once. Both of these should be "whom."

>I think I keep trying to say I was fine, but I think//

Watch the repetitive phrasing.

>I probably should have asked Rainbow Dash, she’s the element of loyalty after all, but I was worried that she might tell someone on accident.//

You should replace those commas with dashes.

>apparently//

You're using this word an awful lot lately. This is the third time on this page. And there's a fourth not long after.

>she could have been seriously hurt helping you me//

Extraneous word.

>led me down my dark path. It lead me into hell. Now that I’ve been lead//

You got the first one right but the next two wrong.

>There are an infinite number of paths in life, I’m not wasting my second chance.//

Comma splice.

>Twilight Sparkle Princess Twilight Sparkle//

Not sure what you were doing here.

>But just because I think highly of myself//

This seems really inconsistent with her message. She's been saying that she was basically pretty contemptible and deserved the abuse she got, but now she comes across as quite the opposite, that she's better than those who attacked her, so they're not worth justifying with her attention. Either one could work, conceptually, but the former is the way you've been playing her, and it's a pretty abrupt shift.

>I know that I’m not the best person//

And now she's backtracking. She needs to have a steady attitude here. It's jumping around.

>others be destroy my place//

Extraneous word.

>This morning I called the officer who was in charge of the case of my attack. I said I was ready to talk about my attack in detail, including who attacked me.//

I haven't really been marking these, but there are definitely places where you repeat a word or phrase several times in a close space. Yes, someone really writing a diary might do this. But you're also telling a story, so you have to make it entertaining, too.

>She said I was doing the right thing.//

I think Sunset is really downplaying this, and she shouldn't be. Put yourself in Applejack's place. She might still be a little angry. Did she know Sunset was going to do this before she actually picked up the phone? Either way, she'd be pretty emphatic about supporting Sunset's decision, and that would have made more of an impression that just a brief mention that she said it was right. You're missing an opportunity here to characterize both Applejack and their relationship.

>I had to skip over anything magical//

Why? Isn't it pretty much public knowledge at this point?

>apologise to them and give them a chance to apologize//

British and American spellings are both fine, but don't mix them.

>I didn’t want to push them down the road anymore than I already had.//

Another spot where you're not using it as an adverb, so you need "any more" to be two words.

>If I don’t even try to explain to them, then how am I suppose to expect them to act any different.//

"Supposed," and it's a question, right? She seems to be covering the same ground multiple times here. She keeps going on about why she doesn't want her attackers punished for her sake, and it's getting repetitive. It dilutes the message, and it makes for a more boring entry. This entry could stand to be trimmed back.

>Ug//

Usually spelled "ugh."

>At first I thought it might just be a pony thing, we tend to be a bit more communal and peaceful after all.//

Comma splice.

>After talking with a few of my attackers, however, I realized they felt bad about what they did to me too, and after talking with them//

More repetitive phrasing.

>hand write//

As used here, hyphenate this.

>everyone of them//

"Every one" needs to be two words in this usage.

>After fixing the pitching machine for the baseball team//

It's reasonable to assume they'd have a baseball team, but in the first movie, Dash is specifically mentioned as being on the softball team, which would probably also use the machine.

>replacing the mascot uniform//

I guess I can't believe that Rarity wouldn't have done this long ago.

>jobs opportunities//

Typo.

>It also sounded like fun; something new for me to experience with my new friends.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause after it.

>Back to my day; Fluttershy and Rarity didn’t have anything to do until the barn raising//

Misused semicolon. Actually, a colon would work here.

>a subjects//

Typo.

>different points of views//

Typo.

>black skinned//

Hyphenate.

>resume//

You put the accent marks on it before. Either is fine, but be consistent. In a diary, she's probably not going to bother using them.

>it seemed to bother her//

How so? What did she do?

>mix of helplessness, thankfulness, and anger//

Better to show what kinds of thought these cause to go through her head than to name the emotions directly.

>hands on//

Hyphenate.

>it’s tail//

Its/it's confusion.

>I sound a little bland there, don’t I.//

It's a question, right?

>Better safe then sorry.//

Then/than confusion.

>twenty minute//

In this usage, hyphenate.

>family of the Apple Family//

Redundant.

>But honestly working together, trying to be there for each other, doing nice things, and even just having fun; that’s what friendship is about.//

Misused semicolon. This one feels like it should be a dash.

>farm fresh//

Hyphenate.

>I think. I think

You're trying to force a speech affectation into writing again.

>you could imagine. I couldn’t imagine//

Repetitive.

I don't really have any great insights here, as it didn't have any overarching flaws, just the stuff I already pointed out. It used the diary format more realistically that the majority of stories I see, and I honestly can't figure out why it has such a pedestrian vote ratio. Though looking into the statistics more, it got most of those downvotes in chapter 1, which as I said, doesn't have as much going for it as the other chapters, since it's largely a movie recap. I also do want to make sure you have a real ending planned, where some conflict is resolved in a meaningful way or some watershed moment in character development occurs.

On a side note, I'm impressed by the progress you've made. It must have been about three years ago that I reviewed a story for you in The Training Ground, and while I tried to give you what help I could, it had a lot of issues with it. But you apparently kept working at it through the years, and now I see that Seattle's Angels featured it. I haven't read it since all those years ago, but this story is such a huge improvement over what you'd written then.<span class="unkfunc">&gt;Professor Snowflake//</span><br />It&#039;s a high school. They shouldn&#039;t have professors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;falling bunny//</span><br />This is brilliant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;best tasting//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;left me feeling happy about the conversation//</span><br />Focus more on the effects than summing it up as &quot;happy.&quot; What physical sensations does it give her? How has her impression of Applejack changed?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;No telling what people would do with you, Dairy.//</span><br />She likes that milk, huh?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Be it the tantalizing call of power//</span><br />Watch that unnatural formalism again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m suppose to//</span><br />Verb form.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Goodnight//</span><br />Two words, and you&#039;re missing the end punctuation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The school has to be treating them as bad as me and they don’t have anyone helping them.//</span><br />You have a point there. They never suffered any ill effects for their involvement. People glared at Sunset but ignored Snips and Snails.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;still surprises me sometimes. Still//</span><br />Watch for repeating all but the most mundane of words that close together.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I guess Rarity has a knack for details, no wonder her clothing always looks so professional.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I knew he wasn’t happy to see me. I guess that’s why I haven&#039;t seen him.//</span><br />The phrasing here is pretty repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dammit, all to Hell.//</span><br />Unnecessary comma, and you haven&#039;t been capitalizing that. Incidentally, the use of all caps in this entry is far more appropriate than the use of italics in the prologue.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; I.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; Applejack, she//</span><br />First, I&#039;m not sure why these are indented. Second, this is really a speech affectation, which doesn&#039;t translate into writing well. This is one of the few times that I think strikethroughs might be appropriate. In a letter, I hate seeing them, because the person writing the letter typically isn&#039;t in a hurry or has no reason why they can&#039;t just get a clean sheet of paper and start over. But a diary entry may well be written in a moment of passion, and she might not want to waste the finite number of pages by starting over. So I think they&#039;d be justified here and more authentic at trying to get across what you want here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Snail//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they. They.//</span><br />Again, this isn&#039;t a writing affectation. It comes across as trying to imitate more how she&#039;d say it, and it just doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I just cried until I fell asleep, I think.//</span><br />On her lawn? Or did they take her inside? Let me also warn you here against &quot;piling on.&quot; It&#039;s a good idea to limit bad things to the minimum needed to make the plot work. When you load on a bunch more than is necessary, it cheapens the effect. Less is often more.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when I ripped their souls from their bodies and consuming them//</span><br />Verb form inconsistency.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;phantom echoes of power to fulfill my every desire//</span><br />You&#039;re losing that feel of natural writing again. This sounds way too rehearsed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t know how long I laid there.//</span><br />I haven&#039;t marked it, even though I&#039;ve seen this same mistake before: lay/lie confusion. But she&#039;s a high school kid, and I bet she actually makes this mistake. Though if you want it to be correct, use &quot;lay.&quot; &quot;Laid&quot; requires a direct object, so in past tense, you laid your head down, but you lay down.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I instantly felt a mix of relief and embarrassment.//</span><br />Again, let the narrator carry this a bit without explicitly saying it. &quot;Soomeone actually came to help, but did they know? Could they tell what I&#039;d been thinking? I was sure they did, and I couldn&#039;t look at them until Pinkie hugged me and Fluttershy warned her she probably shouldn&#039;t move me and Rarity called an ambulance.&quot; Stuff like that. Get at the emotion a little indirectly.<br /><br />Edit: wow, I wrote that before I read the next paragraph, and I got 2 of 3 dead on. Heh.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at the same time their mere presence helped me stop clawing for that aetherial power that eluded me//</span><br />Sounding unnatural again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whom I wanted to crush, who I enjoyed splitting up//</span><br />Odd that she gets it right once and wrong once. Both of these should be &quot;whom.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I think I keep trying to say I was fine, but I think//</span><br />Watch the repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I probably should have asked Rainbow Dash, she’s the element of loyalty after all, but I was worried that she might tell someone on accident.//</span><br />You should replace those commas with dashes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;apparently//</span><br />You&#039;re using this word an awful lot lately. This is the third time on this page. And there&#039;s a fourth not long after.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she could have been seriously hurt helping you me//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;led me down my dark path. It lead me into hell. Now that I’ve been lead//</span><br />You got the first one right but the next two wrong.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There are an infinite number of paths in life, I’m not wasting my second chance.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight Sparkle Princess Twilight Sparkle//</span><br />Not sure what you were doing here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But just because I think highly of myself//</span><br />This seems really inconsistent with her message. She&#039;s been saying that she was basically pretty contemptible and deserved the abuse she got, but now she comes across as quite the opposite, that she&#039;s better than those who attacked her, so they&#039;re not worth justifying with her attention. Either one could work, conceptually, but the former is the way you&#039;ve been playing her, and it&#039;s a pretty abrupt shift.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I know that I’m not the best person//</span><br />And now she&#039;s backtracking. She needs to have a steady attitude here. It&#039;s jumping around.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;others be destroy my place//</span><br />Extraneous word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;This morning I called the officer who was in charge of the case of my attack. I said I was ready to talk about my attack in detail, including who attacked me.//</span><br />I haven&#039;t really been marking these, but there are definitely places where you repeat a word or phrase several times in a close space. Yes, someone really writing a diary might do this. But you&#039;re also telling a story, so you have to make it entertaining, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She said I was doing the right thing.//</span><br />I think Sunset is really downplaying this, and she shouldn&#039;t be. Put yourself in Applejack&#039;s place. She might still be a little angry. Did she know Sunset was going to do this before she actually picked up the phone? Either way, she&#039;d be pretty emphatic about supporting Sunset&#039;s decision, and that would have made more of an impression that just a brief mention that she said it was right. You&#039;re missing an opportunity here to characterize both Applejack and their relationship.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I had to skip over anything magical//</span><br />Why? Isn&#039;t it pretty much public knowledge at this point?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;apologise to them and give them a chance to apologize//</span><br />British and American spellings are both fine, but don&#039;t mix them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I didn’t want to push them down the road anymore than I already had.//</span><br />Another spot where you&#039;re not using it as an adverb, so you need &quot;any more&quot; to be two words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I don’t even try to explain to them, then how am I suppose to expect them to act any different.//</span><br />&quot;Supposed,&quot; and it&#039;s a question, right? She seems to be covering the same ground multiple times here. She keeps going on about why she doesn&#039;t want her attackers punished for her sake, and it&#039;s getting repetitive. It dilutes the message, and it makes for a more boring entry. This entry could stand to be trimmed back.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ug//</span><br />Usually spelled &quot;ugh.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At first I thought it might just be a pony thing, we tend to be a bit more communal and peaceful after all.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After talking with a few of my attackers, however, I realized they felt bad about what they did to me too, and after talking with them//</span><br />More repetitive phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hand write//</span><br />As used here, hyphenate this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;everyone of them//</span><br />&quot;Every one&quot; needs to be two words in this usage.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;After fixing the pitching machine for the baseball team//</span><br />It&#039;s reasonable to assume they&#039;d have a baseball team, but in the first movie, Dash is specifically mentioned as being on the softball team, which would probably also use the machine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;replacing the mascot uniform//</span><br />I guess I can&#039;t believe that Rarity wouldn&#039;t have done this long ago.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;jobs opportunities//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It also sounded like fun; something new for me to experience with my new friends.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. There&#039;s no independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Back to my day; Fluttershy and Rarity didn’t have anything to do until the barn raising//</span><br />Misused semicolon. Actually, a colon would work here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a subjects//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;different points of views//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;black skinned//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;resume//</span><br />You put the accent marks on it before. Either is fine, but be consistent. In a diary, she&#039;s probably not going to bother using them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it seemed to bother her//</span><br />How so? What did she do?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;mix of helplessness, thankfulness, and anger//</span><br />Better to show what kinds of thought these cause to go through her head than to name the emotions directly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;hands on//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s tail//</span><br />Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I sound a little bland there, don’t I.//</span><br />It&#039;s a question, right?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Better safe then sorry.//</span><br />Then/than confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;twenty minute//</span><br />In this usage, hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;family of the Apple Family//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But honestly working together, trying to be there for each other, doing nice things, and even just having fun; that’s what friendship is about.//</span><br />Misused semicolon. This one feels like it should be a dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;farm fresh//</span><br />Hyphenate.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I think. I think</span><br />You&#039;re trying to force a speech affectation into writing again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;you could imagine. I couldn’t imagine//</span><br />Repetitive.<br /><br />I don&#039;t really have any great insights here, as it didn&#039;t have any overarching flaws, just the stuff I already pointed out. It used the diary format more realistically that the majority of stories I see, and I honestly can&#039;t figure out why it has such a pedestrian vote ratio. Though looking into the statistics more, it got most of those downvotes in chapter 1, which as I said, doesn&#039;t have as much going for it as the other chapters, since it&#039;s largely a movie recap. I also do want to make sure you have a real ending planned, where some conflict is resolved in a meaningful way or some watershed moment in character development occurs.<br /><br />On a side note, I&#039;m impressed by the progress you&#039;ve made. It must have been about three years ago that I reviewed a story for you in The Training Ground, and while I tried to give you what help I could, it had a lot of issues with it. But you apparently kept working at it through the years, and now I see that Seattle&#039;s Angels featured it. I haven&#039;t read it since all those years ago, but this story is such a huge improvement over what you&#039;d written then.<br />

Follow up Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 352

>>132114
Thank you for your detailed feedback. The fact that you took the extra time to go above and beyond means a lot to me as does your vote of confidence.

I just finished looking over the prolog and had a few comments and clarrifying questions.

Commas. Yeah, commas are the bane of my existance. I'm getting better but it I still somehow manage to write in a way that seems to have both to many commas, and still need more. If there is one thing that will most likely get this returned a second time it would likely be comma usage and I will be honest about that.

Dear Lord is actually a joke that is very small in the fandom. You have Princess Celestia, head of the pony realms, and the Dear Lord, in charge of the dear relms. It's something not a lot of people use, but there is a small number of us in the fandom who enjoy that joke, probably only a few thousand. It also happens to play into a larger comment on Sunset, that being that she kept that exclimation because it also fits in with the himan world.

Just to confirm what you said about the "Speaking of Flahs let's…" line. It would become "Speaking of Flash, let’s…" correct?

You say this "Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing.//" is a typo, but I can't find it. The one possibile 'fix' in this "Those memories I have, they make those choice tantalizing to do again." But I don't think that fixes what you meant.


I have the first chapter as a pro-log because some people care more about the events of a story and this chapter has few real new events. It's very much a character story so I let people know that the first chapter can be skipped by calling it a prolog. You mentioned that it sets up the story but that it's not Sunset's goal to set up the story, it's mine. I agree but I don't understand how this relates to me calling the story a prolog.

As to explaining Epistolary, that's more complicated. I really find Epistolaries facinating, but I also find that a lot of people miss things about them and will complain about the story in the exact way that they miss something. In short, I posted the story to a few comment groups on FIMFiction and some people latched on easily to the nature of an epistolary while others got really excited when they learned about it but missed it when they looked over the story the first time.

My explination does kind of talk down to some readers, but the ones who get it will likely understand that it's there for others while most people who need the explination will learn from it. Even if they feel a little talked down to it can help the people who benifit from the information to enjoy my story and other stories better. If they choose not to read the story because of it then I am willing to accept that so that others who do read it can enjoy it more.

I'll probably look over another chapter or two tonight, but if I don't I wanted to make these comments now.

Thanks agin for the help and encouragment.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132114" onclick="return highlight('132114', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132114">&gt;&gt;132114</a><br />Thank you for your detailed feedback. The fact that you took the extra time to go above and beyond means a lot to me as does your vote of confidence.<br /><br />I just finished looking over the prolog and had a few comments and clarrifying questions.<br /><br />Commas. Yeah, commas are the bane of my existance. I&#039;m getting better but it I still somehow manage to write in a way that seems to have both to many commas, and still need more. If there is one thing that will most likely get this returned a second time it would likely be comma usage and I will be honest about that.<br /><br />Dear Lord is actually a joke that is very small in the fandom. You have Princess Celestia, head of the pony realms, and the Dear Lord, in charge of the dear relms. It&#039;s something not a lot of people use, but there is a small number of us in the fandom who enjoy that joke, probably only a few thousand. It also happens to play into a larger comment on Sunset, that being that she kept that exclimation because it also fits in with the himan world.<br /><br />Just to confirm what you said about the &quot;Speaking of Flahs let&#039;s…&quot; line. It would become &quot;Speaking of Flash, let’s…&quot; correct?<br /><br />You say this &quot;Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing.//&quot; is a typo, but I can&#039;t find it. The one possibile &#039;fix&#039; in this &quot;Those memories I have, they make those choice tantalizing to do again.&quot; But I don&#039;t think that fixes what you meant.<br /><br /><br />I have the first chapter as a pro-log because some people care more about the events of a story and this chapter has few real new events. It&#039;s very much a character story so I let people know that the first chapter can be skipped by calling it a prolog. You mentioned that it sets up the story but that it&#039;s not Sunset&#039;s goal to set up the story, it&#039;s mine. I agree but I don&#039;t understand how this relates to me calling the story a prolog.<br /><br />As to explaining Epistolary, that&#039;s more complicated. I really find Epistolaries facinating, but I also find that a lot of people miss things about them and will complain about the story in the exact way that they miss something. In short, I posted the story to a few comment groups on FIMFiction and some people latched on easily to the nature of an epistolary while others got really excited when they learned about it but missed it when they looked over the story the first time.<br /><br />My explination does kind of talk down to some readers, but the ones who get it will likely understand that it&#039;s there for others while most people who need the explination will learn from it. Even if they feel a little talked down to it can help the people who benifit from the information to enjoy my story and other stories better. If they choose not to read the story because of it then I am willing to accept that so that others who do read it can enjoy it more.<br /><br />I&#039;ll probably look over another chapter or two tonight, but if I don&#039;t I wanted to make these comments now.<br /><br />Thanks agin for the help and encouragment.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 353

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>she knew that she’d spent another night passed out at her desk//

Since you go on to show me anyway, what's the need to say it outright?

>Swallowing several gulps, Twilight sighed with bliss//

Really watch when you directly identify an emotion or mood like this "with bliss." Along with prepositional phrases like that, other shief offenders include adverb forms (happily) and outright stating it (He was sad). Also note that participles imply concurrent action, so you have her sighing and swallowing at the same time, which is an impressive feat to pull off.

>He set both plates on the simple kitchen table rather than waddling all the way over to the dining room and hopped into his seat right as Twilight entered.//

The timeline gets a little foggy here, too. Keep in mind that your narrator's stayed in Twilight's perspective, so until she gets to where she can see him, she can't describe what he's doing, and neither can the narrator.

>imitation pig flesh//

Okay, this really raises some questions. Why have an imitation form of something ponies wouldn't eat in the first place?

> just a foot away from the tantalizing aroma of succulent foodstuffs her number one assistant had prepared for her that day.//

This is very repetitive with her already having smelled it earlier in the same paragraph.

>Crossing the kitchen floor in a gait that simultaneously made all the wyrms in the world bury themselves in their hordes out of shame of being associated to this purple spawn//

While amusing, does Twilight really think this? You've been using a limited narrator in her perspective, so that's the implication.

>protecting her old foalsitter from Spike’s wayward comment//

Again, don't over-explain a character's motivation for something they've said or done. Sometimes no explanation is needed, and when one is, it should be subtle and delicate—implied, not stated overtly. You want to leave the reader room to figure it out on his own, but give him the right clues so that he reaches the conclusion you want him to. Focus on what she says, what she does, how she looks (body language, facial expression) to get the emotion across.

>as she thought of taking Cadance to all her favorite places, like Sugarcube Corner, where visions of sugar plums danced through her head.//

Instead of telling me this, show it. What does she imagine? How does it look? What do they do?

>“Busy today… what do you mean, Spike?”//

When it doesn't fit the syntax to be a continuation of the same sentence, capitalize after an ellipsis.

>The purple alicorn//

Watch using these kinds of descriptors. There's not really a reason to do so.

>Puzzled, she rubbed a chin with her hoof//

See, don't tell me she's puzzled. The rest already gets that across. There's a brief explanation of why this works in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Twilight swallowed hard, her shaky forelimb slowly lowering back to the ground.//

This is how to do it right. All I get is the raw evidence of her appearance and behavior, plus the preceding indirect thought delivered by the narrator. You haven't ever said how she feels, but I can determine it easily.

>with her anxiety//

More telling.

>While she thought//

Don't tell me she thought it. That's already apparent from the fact that the limited narrator in her perspective is saying what she thought. This is redundant and distancing.

>whiplash stall-dive//

Sorry, I'm an aerodynamicist in my day job. "Stall-dive" is a pretty nonsensical thing, and something like a pegasus wing isn't going to have a sudden stall, so "whiplash" doesn't ring true, either.

>For those of you who aren’t even close to Rainbow Dash’s level, that means she was going to go really fast and stuff.//

It's a really clunky thing to address the reader like this, unless you established from the start that it was going to happen regularly. Plus it opens a can of worms as to why I'm there and why the narrator wants to talk to me.

>Spiraling out of the latest set of dives and twirls, Rainbow Dash slid to a stop//

More synchronization problems. She'd slide to a stop after spiraling out, not at the same time.

>80’s//

’80s. And make sure the aspostrophe goes the right direction. Smart quotes always get that wrong on the front of a word. It'll work if you just cut and paste the existing one over there.

>painfully pink and heart-themed buildings//

This is coming across with no flavor. Dash is your narrator here. What does she think about them? What's her reaction to a few details? Carry this through what she says and how she says it. As a blunt fact without an emotional basis backing it up, it's pretty dry.

>because it’d been four paragraphs into her scene//

Meta-humor like this has been done often enough that it's pretty cliched by now. You want your story to survive on something more substantial than gimmicks.

>poorly-concealed//

When the first part of a two-word descriptive phrase is an -ly adverb, you don't use a hyphen.

>punji//

The word choice implies Dash would know what this is and be inclined to use the term. I'm not convinced, without some explanation as to how she'd be familiar with it.

>frazzled purple alicorn//

What about her makes her seem frazzled? And maybe you should read the section at the top of this thread about Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.

>was reinforcing//

You're using a lot of these past participles. What do you lose by converting them to simple past tense? And then you also get rid of some boring "to be" auxiliary verbs.

>blatantly ignoring the finely crafted piece of narrative that told the audience as much.//

C'mon. This is a really tired joke.

Strikethroughs in narration.
I'm out.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she knew that she’d spent another night passed out at her desk//</span><br />Since you go on to show me anyway, what&#039;s the need to say it outright?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Swallowing several gulps, Twilight sighed with bliss//</span><br />Really watch when you directly identify an emotion or mood like this &quot;with bliss.&quot; Along with prepositional phrases like that, other shief offenders include adverb forms (happily) and outright stating it (He was sad). Also note that participles imply concurrent action, so you have her sighing and swallowing at the same time, which is an impressive feat to pull off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He set both plates on the simple kitchen table rather than waddling all the way over to the dining room and hopped into his seat right as Twilight entered.//</span><br />The timeline gets a little foggy here, too. Keep in mind that your narrator&#039;s stayed in Twilight&#039;s perspective, so until she gets to where she can see him, she can&#039;t describe what he&#039;s doing, and neither can the narrator.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;imitation pig flesh//</span><br />Okay, this really raises some questions. Why have an imitation form of something ponies wouldn&#039;t eat in the first place?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; just a foot away from the tantalizing aroma of succulent foodstuffs her number one assistant had prepared for her that day.//</span><br />This is very repetitive with her already having smelled it earlier in the same paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Crossing the kitchen floor in a gait that simultaneously made all the wyrms in the world bury themselves in their hordes out of shame of being associated to this purple spawn//</span><br />While amusing, does Twilight really think this? You&#039;ve been using a limited narrator in her perspective, so that&#039;s the implication.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;protecting her old foalsitter from Spike’s wayward comment//</span><br />Again, don&#039;t over-explain a character&#039;s motivation for something they&#039;ve said or done. Sometimes no explanation is needed, and when one is, it should be subtle and delicate—implied, not stated overtly. You want to leave the reader room to figure it out on his own, but give him the right clues so that he reaches the conclusion you want him to. Focus on what she says, what she does, how she looks (body language, facial expression) to get the emotion across.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she thought of taking Cadance to all her favorite places, like Sugarcube Corner, where visions of sugar plums danced through her head.//</span><br />Instead of telling me this, show it. What does she imagine? How does it look? What do they do?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Busy today… what do you mean, Spike?”//</span><br />When it doesn&#039;t fit the syntax to be a continuation of the same sentence, capitalize after an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The purple alicorn//</span><br />Watch using these kinds of descriptors. There&#039;s not really a reason to do so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Puzzled, she rubbed a chin with her hoof//</span><br />See, don&#039;t tell me she&#039;s puzzled. The rest already gets that across. There&#039;s a brief explanation of why this works in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight swallowed hard, her shaky forelimb slowly lowering back to the ground.//</span><br />This is how to do it right. All I get is the raw evidence of her appearance and behavior, plus the preceding indirect thought delivered by the narrator. You haven&#039;t ever said how she feels, but I can determine it easily.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with her anxiety//</span><br />More telling.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;While she thought//</span><br />Don&#039;t tell me she thought it. That&#039;s already apparent from the fact that the limited narrator in her perspective is saying what she thought. This is redundant and distancing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;whiplash stall-dive//</span><br />Sorry, I&#039;m an aerodynamicist in my day job. &quot;Stall-dive&quot; is a pretty nonsensical thing, and something like a pegasus wing isn&#039;t going to have a sudden stall, so &quot;whiplash&quot; doesn&#039;t ring true, either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;For those of you who aren’t even close to Rainbow Dash’s level, that means she was going to go really fast and stuff.//</span><br />It&#039;s a really clunky thing to address the reader like this, unless you established from the start that it was going to happen regularly. Plus it opens a can of worms as to why I&#039;m there and why the narrator wants to talk to me.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spiraling out of the latest set of dives and twirls, Rainbow Dash slid to a stop//</span><br />More synchronization problems. She&#039;d slide to a stop after spiraling out, not at the same time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;80’s//</span><br />’80s. And make sure the aspostrophe goes the right direction. Smart quotes always get that wrong on the front of a word. It&#039;ll work if you just cut and paste the existing one over there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;painfully pink and heart-themed buildings//</span><br />This is coming across with no flavor. Dash is your narrator here. What does she think about them? What&#039;s her reaction to a few details? Carry this through what she says and how she says it. As a blunt fact without an emotional basis backing it up, it&#039;s pretty dry.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;because it’d been four paragraphs into her scene//</span><br />Meta-humor like this has been done often enough that it&#039;s pretty cliched by now. You want your story to survive on something more substantial than gimmicks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;poorly-concealed//</span><br />When the first part of a two-word descriptive phrase is an -ly adverb, you don&#039;t use a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;punji//</span><br />The word choice implies Dash would know what this is and be inclined to use the term. I&#039;m not convinced, without some explanation as to how she&#039;d be familiar with it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;frazzled purple alicorn//</span><br />What about her makes her seem frazzled? And maybe you should read the section at the top of this thread about Lavender Unicorn Syndrome.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;was reinforcing//</span><br />You&#039;re using a lot of these past participles. What do you lose by converting them to simple past tense? And then you also get rid of some boring &quot;to be&quot; auxiliary verbs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;blatantly ignoring the finely crafted piece of narrative that told the audience as much.//</span><br />C&#039;mon. This is a really tired joke.<br /><br />Strikethroughs in narration.<br />I&#039;m out.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 354

>>132116
>Just to confirm what you said about the "Speaking of Flahs let's…" line. It would become "Speaking of Flash, let’s…" correct?
Yes.

>You say this "Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing.//" is a typo, but I can't find it. The one possibile 'fix' in this "Those memories I have, they make those choice tantalizing to do again." But I don't think that fixes what you meant.

"Those choice" has a plural/singular mismatch.

>I have the first chapter as a pro-log because some people care more about the events of a story and this chapter has few real new events. It's very much a character story so I let people know that the first chapter can be skipped by calling it a prolog. You mentioned that it sets up the story but that it's not Sunset's goal to set up the story, it's mine. I agree but I don't understand how this relates to me calling the story a prolog.

It's because it implies there's something different about this. But it's not an explanatory passage that sets up the rest of the story. It's just another diary entry. By calling it a prologue, you're implying Sunset had some related purpose in writing it, but she didn't. She's not providing context to frame how the rest of the diary goes. She just starts writing the first of many entries. You're kind of working at cross-purposes here.

>If they choose not to read the story because of it then I am willing to accept that so that others who do read it can enjoy it more.

It just makes things look amateurish to do this. Let your work stand on its own.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132116" onclick="return highlight('132116', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132116">&gt;&gt;132116</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just to confirm what you said about the &quot;Speaking of Flahs let&#039;s…&quot; line. It would become &quot;Speaking of Flash, let’s…&quot; correct?</span><br />Yes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You say this &quot;Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing.//&quot; is a typo, but I can&#039;t find it. The one possibile &#039;fix&#039; in this &quot;Those memories I have, they make those choice tantalizing to do again.&quot; But I don&#039;t think that fixes what you meant.</span><br />&quot;Those choice&quot; has a plural/singular mismatch.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have the first chapter as a pro-log because some people care more about the events of a story and this chapter has few real new events. It&#039;s very much a character story so I let people know that the first chapter can be skipped by calling it a prolog. You mentioned that it sets up the story but that it&#039;s not Sunset&#039;s goal to set up the story, it&#039;s mine. I agree but I don&#039;t understand how this relates to me calling the story a prolog.</span><br />It&#039;s because it implies there&#039;s something different about this. But it&#039;s not an explanatory passage that sets up the rest of the story. It&#039;s just another diary entry. By calling it a prologue, you&#039;re implying Sunset had some related purpose in writing it, but she didn&#039;t. She&#039;s not providing context to frame how the rest of the diary goes. She just starts writing the first of many entries. You&#039;re kind of working at cross-purposes here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If they choose not to read the story because of it then I am willing to accept that so that others who do read it can enjoy it more.</span><br />It just makes things look amateurish to do this. Let your work stand on its own.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 355

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First off, let me say that I enjoyed the story, so I took care to dig deep here and provide plenty of feedback not only on what would get it over the threshold for posting, but also what I think it could do to really shine.

>Night settled abruptly on Canterlot.//

That's pretty close to a weather-report opening. It's also not doing much as a hook. I mean, I'm not going to refuse to post the story if you don't change it. I just think you can do better.

>The castle felt so different, looked so much more menacing at night, even though the bright moonlight made it easy to see.//

Since Celestia is the only character mentioned so far, this statement would appear to be in her perspective. But then you move on to Spike. So whose opinion is this? If Spike's then establish him as the perspective character before you start making subjective statements for him.

>Spike walked through the hallways slowly, cautiously. Every shadow felt like a threat, a hiding spot for some dangerous creature.//

Except I don't get to see any of this in his narration or behavior. Have him jump at an unexpected sound, muse in the limited narration that the spiky shadow he sees might be a razorbacked… something. In the latter part of the paragraph and the following couple, you do, but it's delayed until after the factual statement here, so it's muted by then, less immediate, like it's not actually bothering him that much. Keepp him in the moment, reacting to these things the instant he sees them.

>Nearly the entire castle separated his room near//

>towers. Her door towered//
Quasi-repetitive there.

>The picture of her cutie mark embossed in the wood alone dwarfed him, the door handles seemed so far out of his reach.//

Comma splice, which might be a stylistic fit, but if so, it'd help to emphasize it by doing it more and adopting something closer to a stream of consciousness to the narration.

>she still looked imposing//

I feel like I'm nitpicking here, but these types of things are what's keeping the story just over the edge of being really immersive. As stated, this is just a fact. It doesn't mean anything to me. How does her appearance make him feel? What images flash through his mind, what physical symptoms do the emotions cause?

>Spike paused.//

For some reason, authors love this sentence, but it's utterly bland. What happens during the pause? It's obviously supposed to carry some meaning that he pauses, but what connotes that meaning even better is his or Celestia's behavior.

>He had taken a while to work up the nerve to cross the castle.//

How so? Did he give himself a pep talk? Did he convince himself it was to Twilight's benefit? This could be a good characterization moment for him.

>Why don’t you come inside, this hallway is rather dark and drafty.//

Splice.

>it still looked imposing//

You already said that.

>Even with the curtains drawn//

You already have one of these "even" qualifiers in the paragraph. It feels repetitive.

>The walls were littered with bookshelves, packed with books and rocks and metal instruments and ten thousand other things Spike couldn’t recognize.//

Do any of them catch his eye? Do any of the rocks look appetizing? This is kind of a tangent thing, but if you can place something in the room that'll show up periodically, it can be a great way to tie things together and add a spark of realism. Maybe it just keeps grabbing his attention or something. Better yet, maybe it's symbolic of the story's message.

>walk all the way over here//

She used that exact phrasing already.

>knelt down again//

Wait, when did she get up? The "swept Spike into her room" wouldn't necessarily mean she did.

>at least not in a way that a child could see.//

This is breaking from the narrator's perspective. You're either going to Celestia's head or backing off to an omniscient viewpoint. But I don't see the advantage of either.

>Celestia sighed, then settled slowly onto the bed.//

This suggests she was above it or at least level with it. But you had her on the floor next to it, so it doesn't quite jive. Notice that you're skimping on having Spike do anything between bits of dialogue relative to Celestia.

>Celestia wrapped a wing around Spike.//

Last time you mentioned her wing, it was already around him. When did that change?

>Spike nodded. “I don’t mind.”//

Look how many times you use this structure. Short narrative. "Short quote." I'm not going to call it problematic yet, as you do mix up a few paragraphs where the dialogue comes first. But you might want to get into a bit more narration here and there to vary the length of these paragraphs.

>Ages ago, Equestria was still tiny. A powerful creature had tried to hurt the ponies, and he had caused immeasurable damage. There were two sisters, an older one and a younger one, one white and one blue. They had defeated the powerful creature, just barely, and every pony showered them with praise and admiration. But that’s a different story.//

This is all very vague and simply phrased. That's not a problem in itself. I'm just pointing it out, since I might need to refer to it later. For now, I'm going to presume that you want to create a children's story feel as Celestia relates the tale to Spike. We'll see if you can maintain that tone.

>We have not defeated the creature yet; we must repair all the damage he has caused.//

Okay, this may be overdoing it. The narration just said exactly the same thing. If that's intentional, I think it may be aiming for an audience younger than Spike.

>But those are different stories.//

You already used that conceit. At the beginning was fine, since we hadn't gotten into the tale yet. But here, it's kicking me out of the narrative. It's like when someone is telling a joke, then has to backtrack. It just puts a huge speed bump in there.

>“What has happened here?” The two sisters asked.//

Capitalization.

>The sisters turned, and saw a cloaked quadruped in the shadow of a tree.//

I've caught you doing this a few times, but the prior ones were on the edge of being justified. You generally aren't going to use a comma when there are merely two items of a compound structure. You will when there are actually separate clauses. There's a brief discussion of that at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

>That dragon is not plain//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Probably "ordinary," but when used in isolation like this, it usually refers to appearance, not capabilities.

>but that’s a different story.//

This is really getting repetitive, and it's also bad to keep pointing out that your story has loose ends. The reader's going to think of this anyway.

>““Farewell, then, and good luck to you. You will certainly need it, too!”//

Extra quotation marks.

>the stranger took their leave//

"Her," not "their." I know it's become acceptable to use that as a singular, but there's no reason to obscure the stranger's gender, and as this story is trying to sound ancient, it wouldn't follow modern practices anyway.

>thickened, the sky darkened, and the air grew thicker//

Watch that repetition.

>It looked like a jagged wound in the sky//

To whom? They sure don't react to it as if it does. Unless you want to qualify this as someone's opinion, just have that narrator state it as a fact without dithering on the "looked like" bit.

>The mountain was hollow despite its size//

I'm not sure how size correlates with likelihood of being hollow.

>It reminded the sisters of a shell whose animal had been ripped out.//

This image can work, but tie the violent image of "ripped out" to something about the place. because otherwise, how would it be any different than comparing it to a shell whose animal had abandoned it?

>She was not roughly cut or jagged like other dragons were, she was sleek and thin and elegant.//

You just used "jagged" not long ago, and there's a comma splice.

>Coins of every metal//

Maybe specify "precious" metal? Because there are many that would be impractical to use for coins, like lead or tungsten.

>Cups and vases and furniture lined the walls, and gems and jewels and crystals piled in the corners.//

The way you've phrased that, the gems actually moved to pile themselves in the corners.

>equipage//

Remember this is a kid's tale. Your language is getting a bit advanced for that in this spot.

>fire leaked from her mouth and nostrils//

You already used that.

>“Disgraceful ponies, dare you wake me up?” she said in a whisper that shook the mountain, “What makes you brave the wrath of waking me? The Dragon’s Mother hates to be disturbed.”//

By having commas on both ends of the attribution, you've implied that the parts of the quote on both sides of it form a single sentence, but they don't. You already acknowledge that by putting end punctuation on the first part.

>your highness//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>crunching gravel//

That's not exactly a rumble.

>being amplified by a concert hall//

A concert hall doesn't amplify sound. It's just designed not to deaden it.

>A pair of dainty little ponies dare, to come and challenge Tiamat to a game?//

There is no grammatical reason to have a comma there.

>‘Tis//

Smart quotes break on leading apostrophes. This is backward. You can type two and erase the first or paste one in the right way. Scan for these, as it happens more than once.

>Were you to win//

Needs a comma after the dependent clause.

>which the hotter of the two//

Missing word.

>“What was the first name ever given?” the two sisters asked.//

So they were right? I guess so, since they moved on to asking their next question, but Tiamat never acknowledged so. I also wonder how the ponies know whether Tiamat's answers are correct. Do they trust each other to go on the honor system?

>None; this mountain’s wholly made of granite.//

Which contains quite a bit of silica, and thus would become sand when pulverized.

>Now the sisters were stumped.//

There are a couple places in here where they use a fairly modern and informal wording which doesn't match the overall tone.

>The younger sister was getting annoyed.//

You can get away with being telly in a children's story, but this is a pretty climactic moment. I'd try selling this more through her body language.

>the scorch marks and melted coins on the floor stopped just short of their feet, both completely unharmed.//

Capitalization.

>Celestia smiled.//

You used an extra line break to set off the beginning of the inner story, so why not the end?

>Celestia fought the urge to frown. Twilight was still bowing.//

I'm not sure this was a good choice. The opening scene had been in Spike's perspective, and the story was for his benefit. Then we never go back to him afterward. It seems like a disconnect. I wonder if it wouldn't work better to put the opening scene in Celestia's perspective to unify the whole thing but that would mean trimming off the part before Spike gets to her room, since she wasn't there to witness it. Or make it so that she does see it, I suppose.

>in thought//

These telly prepositional phrases are almost always redundant with information already in the story, as this one is.

>the look of satisfaction and pride//

You're not in the fairy tale anymore, so you don't have a good excuse to be telly. Show me what this looks like.

>there is boat//

Missing word.

>I suppose that just seems, disingenuous.//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses. There isn't a grammatical reason to have one there.

>The sheer cuteness of it helped override her discomfort at the meaning.//

You're using a fairly subjective narrator. This would work better through narrative comment to get at it indirectly.

I'm not quite sure what to make of that ending. Celestia's made her argument, then something a little extraneous happens, and then Celestia appears to make a very sarcastic comment to Twilight. Maybe she's saying this in earnest, but it comes with a rather fine point on it. And the focus seems to have moved away from Spike finding his place in society to Twilight learning about subtlety in politics.

Anyway, I really liked this story, but it needs a little tune-up. It should be clear which items I noted were just suggestions for what I thought would make the story stronger and which ones are actual problems. The biggest in my mind are that it could use some unity of perspective and message, and pay attention to keeping a fairy-tale feel through the middle section, where the language gets a bit too advanced in places.

When you're ready to resubmit, please choose the "back from Mars" option. It shouldn't take more than a skim to check again. If you have questions, feel free to ask here or respond through the email.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />First off, let me say that I enjoyed the story, so I took care to dig deep here and provide plenty of feedback not only on what would get it over the threshold for posting, but also what I think it could do to really shine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Night settled abruptly on Canterlot.//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty close to a weather-report opening. It&#039;s also not doing much as a hook. I mean, I&#039;m not going to refuse to post the story if you don&#039;t change it. I just think you can do better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The castle felt so different, looked so much more menacing at night, even though the bright moonlight made it easy to see.//</span><br />Since Celestia is the only character mentioned so far, this statement would appear to be in her perspective. But then you move on to Spike. So whose opinion is this? If Spike&#039;s then establish him as the perspective character before you start making subjective statements for him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike walked through the hallways slowly, cautiously. Every shadow felt like a threat, a hiding spot for some dangerous creature.//</span><br />Except I don&#039;t get to see any of this in his narration or behavior. Have him jump at an unexpected sound, muse in the limited narration that the spiky shadow he sees might be a razorbacked… something. In the latter part of the paragraph and the following couple, you do, but it&#039;s delayed until after the factual statement here, so it&#039;s muted by then, less immediate, like it&#039;s not actually bothering him that much. Keepp him in the moment, reacting to these things the instant he sees them.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nearly the entire castle separated his room near//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;towers. Her door towered//</span><br />Quasi-repetitive there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The picture of her cutie mark embossed in the wood alone dwarfed him, the door handles seemed so far out of his reach.//</span><br />Comma splice, which might be a stylistic fit, but if so, it&#039;d help to emphasize it by doing it more and adopting something closer to a stream of consciousness to the narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she still looked imposing//</span><br />I feel like I&#039;m nitpicking here, but these types of things are what&#039;s keeping the story just over the edge of being really immersive. As stated, this is just a fact. It doesn&#039;t mean anything to me. How does her appearance make him feel? What images flash through his mind, what physical symptoms do the emotions cause?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike paused.//</span><br />For some reason, authors love this sentence, but it&#039;s utterly bland. What happens during the pause? It&#039;s obviously supposed to carry some meaning that he pauses, but what connotes that meaning even better is his or Celestia&#039;s behavior.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He had taken a while to work up the nerve to cross the castle.//</span><br />How so? Did he give himself a pep talk? Did he convince himself it was to Twilight&#039;s benefit? This could be a good characterization moment for him.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why don’t you come inside, this hallway is rather dark and drafty.//</span><br />Splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it still looked imposing//</span><br />You already said that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even with the curtains drawn//</span><br />You already have one of these &quot;even&quot; qualifiers in the paragraph. It feels repetitive.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The walls were littered with bookshelves, packed with books and rocks and metal instruments and ten thousand other things Spike couldn’t recognize.//</span><br />Do any of them catch his eye? Do any of the rocks look appetizing? This is kind of a tangent thing, but if you can place something in the room that&#039;ll show up periodically, it can be a great way to tie things together and add a spark of realism. Maybe it just keeps grabbing his attention or something. Better yet, maybe it&#039;s symbolic of the story&#039;s message.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;walk all the way over here//</span><br />She used that exact phrasing already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;knelt down again//</span><br />Wait, when did she get up? The &quot;swept Spike into her room&quot; wouldn&#039;t necessarily mean she did.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;at least not in a way that a child could see.//</span><br />This is breaking from the narrator&#039;s perspective. You&#039;re either going to Celestia&#039;s head or backing off to an omniscient viewpoint. But I don&#039;t see the advantage of either.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia sighed, then settled slowly onto the bed.//</span><br />This suggests she was above it or at least level with it. But you had her on the floor next to it, so it doesn&#039;t quite jive. Notice that you&#039;re skimping on having Spike do anything between bits of dialogue relative to Celestia.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia wrapped a wing around Spike.//</span><br />Last time you mentioned her wing, it was already around him. When did that change?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spike nodded. “I don’t mind.”//</span><br />Look how many times you use this structure. Short narrative. &quot;Short quote.&quot; I&#039;m not going to call it problematic yet, as you do mix up a few paragraphs where the dialogue comes first. But you might want to get into a bit more narration here and there to vary the length of these paragraphs.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ages ago, Equestria was still tiny. A powerful creature had tried to hurt the ponies, and he had caused immeasurable damage. There were two sisters, an older one and a younger one, one white and one blue. They had defeated the powerful creature, just barely, and every pony showered them with praise and admiration. But that’s a different story.//</span><br />This is all very vague and simply phrased. That&#039;s not a problem in itself. I&#039;m just pointing it out, since I might need to refer to it later. For now, I&#039;m going to presume that you want to create a children&#039;s story feel as Celestia relates the tale to Spike. We&#039;ll see if you can maintain that tone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We have not defeated the creature yet; we must repair all the damage he has caused.//</span><br />Okay, this may be overdoing it. The narration just said exactly the same thing. If that&#039;s intentional, I think it may be aiming for an audience younger than Spike.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But those are different stories.//</span><br />You already used that conceit. At the beginning was fine, since we hadn&#039;t gotten into the tale yet. But here, it&#039;s kicking me out of the narrative. It&#039;s like when someone is telling a joke, then has to backtrack. It just puts a huge speed bump in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“What has happened here?” The two sisters asked.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sisters turned, and saw a cloaked quadruped in the shadow of a tree.//</span><br />I&#039;ve caught you doing this a few times, but the prior ones were on the edge of being justified. You generally aren&#039;t going to use a comma when there are merely two items of a compound structure. You will when there are actually separate clauses. There&#039;s a brief discussion of that at the top of this thread under &quot;comma use with conjunctions.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That dragon is not plain//</span><br />I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Probably &quot;ordinary,&quot; but when used in isolation like this, it usually refers to appearance, not capabilities.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but that’s a different story.//</span><br />This is really getting repetitive, and it&#039;s also bad to keep pointing out that your story has loose ends. The reader&#039;s going to think of this anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;““Farewell, then, and good luck to you. You will certainly need it, too!”//</span><br />Extra quotation marks.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the stranger took their leave//</span><br />&quot;Her,&quot; not &quot;their.&quot; I know it&#039;s become acceptable to use that as a singular, but there&#039;s no reason to obscure the stranger&#039;s gender, and as this story is trying to sound ancient, it wouldn&#039;t follow modern practices anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;thickened, the sky darkened, and the air grew thicker//</span><br />Watch that repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It looked like a jagged wound in the sky//</span><br />To whom? They sure don&#039;t react to it as if it does. Unless you want to qualify this as someone&#039;s opinion, just have that narrator state it as a fact without dithering on the &quot;looked like&quot; bit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mountain was hollow despite its size//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure how size correlates with likelihood of being hollow. <br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It reminded the sisters of a shell whose animal had been ripped out.//</span><br />This image can work, but tie the violent image of &quot;ripped out&quot; to something about the place. because otherwise, how would it be any different than comparing it to a shell whose animal had abandoned it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She was not roughly cut or jagged like other dragons were, she was sleek and thin and elegant.//</span><br />You just used &quot;jagged&quot; not long ago, and there&#039;s a comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Coins of every metal//</span><br />Maybe specify &quot;precious&quot; metal? Because there are many that would be impractical to use for coins, like lead or tungsten.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Cups and vases and furniture lined the walls, and gems and jewels and crystals piled in the corners.//</span><br />The way you&#039;ve phrased that, the gems actually moved to pile themselves in the corners.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;equipage//</span><br />Remember this is a kid&#039;s tale. Your language is getting a bit advanced for that in this spot.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fire leaked from her mouth and nostrils//</span><br />You already used that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Disgraceful ponies, dare you wake me up?” she said in a whisper that shook the mountain, “What makes you brave the wrath of waking me? The Dragon’s Mother hates to be disturbed.”//</span><br />By having commas on both ends of the attribution, you&#039;ve implied that the parts of the quote on both sides of it form a single sentence, but they don&#039;t. You already acknowledge that by putting end punctuation on the first part.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;your highness//</span><br />The honorific would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;crunching gravel//</span><br />That&#039;s not exactly a rumble.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;being amplified by a concert hall//</span><br />A concert hall doesn&#039;t amplify sound. It&#039;s just designed not to deaden it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A pair of dainty little ponies dare, to come and challenge Tiamat to a game?//</span><br />There is no grammatical reason to have a comma there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘Tis//</span><br />Smart quotes break on leading apostrophes. This is backward. You can type two and erase the first or paste one in the right way. Scan for these, as it happens more than once.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Were you to win//</span><br />Needs a comma after the dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which the hotter of the two//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“What was the first name ever given?” the two sisters asked.//</span><br />So they were right? I guess so, since they moved on to asking their next question, but Tiamat never acknowledged so. I also wonder how the ponies know whether Tiamat&#039;s answers are correct. Do they trust each other to go on the honor system?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;None; this mountain’s wholly made of granite.//</span><br />Which contains quite a bit of silica, and thus would become sand when pulverized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Now the sisters were stumped.//</span><br />There are a couple places in here where they use a fairly modern and informal wording which doesn&#039;t match the overall tone.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The younger sister was getting annoyed.//</span><br />You can get away with being telly in a children&#039;s story, but this is a pretty climactic moment. I&#039;d try selling this more through her body language.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the scorch marks and melted coins on the floor stopped just short of their feet, both completely unharmed.//</span><br />Capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia smiled.//</span><br />You used an extra line break to set off the beginning of the inner story, so why not the end?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestia fought the urge to frown. Twilight was still bowing.//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure this was a good choice. The opening scene had been in Spike&#039;s perspective, and the story was for his benefit. Then we never go back to him afterward. It seems like a disconnect. I wonder if it wouldn&#039;t work better to put the opening scene in Celestia&#039;s perspective to unify the whole thing but that would mean trimming off the part before Spike gets to her room, since she wasn&#039;t there to witness it. Or make it so that she does see it, I suppose.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;in thought//</span><br />These telly prepositional phrases are almost always redundant with information already in the story, as this one is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the look of satisfaction and pride//</span><br />You&#039;re not in the fairy tale anymore, so you don&#039;t have a good excuse to be telly. Show me what this looks like.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;there is boat//</span><br />Missing word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I suppose that just seems, disingenuous.//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses. There isn&#039;t a grammatical reason to have one there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sheer cuteness of it helped override her discomfort at the meaning.//</span><br />You&#039;re using a fairly subjective narrator. This would work better through narrative comment to get at it indirectly.<br /><br />I&#039;m not quite sure what to make of that ending. Celestia&#039;s made her argument, then something a little extraneous happens, and then Celestia appears to make a very sarcastic comment to Twilight. Maybe she&#039;s saying this in earnest, but it comes with a rather fine point on it. And the focus seems to have moved away from Spike finding his place in society to Twilight learning about subtlety in politics.<br /><br />Anyway, I really liked this story, but it needs a little tune-up. It should be clear which items I noted were just suggestions for what I thought would make the story stronger and which ones are actual problems. The biggest in my mind are that it could use some unity of perspective and message, and pay attention to keeping a fairy-tale feel through the middle section, where the language gets a bit too advanced in places.<br /><br />When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please choose the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option. It shouldn&#039;t take more than a skim to check again. If you have questions, feel free to ask here or respond through the email.<br />

In Responce to the Diary story Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 356

Finally got around to the changes. I still need to go back and do a general look over for things like comma usage and the more univeral issues you gave examples for. Still, I am very happy with the feedback you gave and will hopefully resubmit next week.

In reguards to your inquiery about the ending. The ending is written, it's one more chapter. I have the first half as a 3rd person conversation between Sunset and the girls where they are reacting to Sunset showing them her diary. A few other things are followed up on as well such as getting the school to at least leave her alone and her fitting in with her job. A large part of making it a 3rd person section is to show that they really do get along now. It also highlights how far she has come when, in the second part, she doesn't cover every detail with her diary as they have replaced it as her best friend. She still covers a few more loose ends. My editors/pre-reader feel like it's a good ending and I got someone to help out who had read the story in one go on her own to get an outside opinion. If it sounds sudden you aren't the only one. When I got to that chapter I was surprised when I realized that it would be the last.

If would would be interested in looking over the google doc as follows, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-L9HAPwtPwxb6D_BYbv9ozzCxO-tMCp7FjFenHPPg6E/edit

In reguards to the story you helped on so long ago, Excessive Worry, I had no idea you were the same person. Quite a coincidence but thank you very much for the vote of confidence. It's been a long road but I feel like I am finally coming into my own as a writer and a large part of that is because of you helping so long ago. Also editing. Thanks dyslexia.

I did have a few follow up things about your comments.

You said ">waste//
Might need smoe clarification. I think you mean garbage, but you might mean someone took a dump on her doorstep."
-The idea was that it was a dump, however it was worded so that the people who wouldn't pick up on that, and would likely be more offended, wouldn't see that as easily.

you said ">Professor Snowflake//
It's a high school. They shouldn't have professors."
-Some schools in America actually do, usually they are professors at colleges part time but when that is the case they do sometimes go by professor. Additionally boarding schools, some private schools, and schools in other countries often have professors. As EQ isn't explicitly in America, and the type of school isn't explicitly stated, I took a liberty here.

you wrote
">I’m suppose to//
Verb form."
So it would be supposed?

You said "Less is often more."
-in reguars to Sunset being hurt. That's actually what I was going for, to an extent. I wanted to show her actually sharing her feelings with the diary, venting to it, and making it less impactful.

"You should replace those commas with dashes."
Rainbow Dash dashingly dashes through Dashing Dash's rainbow dashing dash course. Dashing rainbow like around dashing rainbow stallions over dashes of rainbow salt.

You wrote,"Twilight Sparkle Princess Twilight Sparkle//
Not sure what you were doing here."
- It didn't copy over correctly from gdocs, actually none of them have. Damnit. I'm going back to fix all those by hand.


You said ">replacing the mascot uniform//
I guess I can't believe that Rarity wouldn't have done this long ago."
- I figure she wouldn't really have been anywhere with the mascot for a sports team.

I think that's it. I'll resubmit when I can look over the more persistant issues.

And thanks again for all your help. I know a lot of people don't treat pre-reader with the respect or thanks you deserve but you should know that a lot of us really do appreciate the work you do.
Finally got around to the changes. I still need to go back and do a general look over for things like comma usage and the more univeral issues you gave examples for. Still, I am very happy with the feedback you gave and will hopefully resubmit next week.<br /><br />In reguards to your inquiery about the ending. The ending is written, it&#039;s one more chapter. I have the first half as a 3rd person conversation between Sunset and the girls where they are reacting to Sunset showing them her diary. A few other things are followed up on as well such as getting the school to at least leave her alone and her fitting in with her job. A large part of making it a 3rd person section is to show that they really do get along now. It also highlights how far she has come when, in the second part, she doesn&#039;t cover every detail with her diary as they have replaced it as her best friend. She still covers a few more loose ends. My editors/pre-reader feel like it&#039;s a good ending and I got someone to help out who had read the story in one go on her own to get an outside opinion. If it sounds sudden you aren&#039;t the only one. When I got to that chapter I was surprised when I realized that it would be the last.<br /><br />If would would be interested in looking over the google doc as follows, <a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-L9HAPwtPwxb6D_BYbv9ozzCxO-tMCp7FjFenHPPg6E/edit">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-L9HAPwtPwxb6D_BYbv9ozzCxO-tMCp7FjFenHPPg6E/edit</a><br /><br />In reguards to the story you helped on so long ago, Excessive Worry, I had no idea you were the same person. Quite a coincidence but thank you very much for the vote of confidence. It&#039;s been a long road but I feel like I am finally coming into my own as a writer and a large part of that is because of you helping so long ago. Also editing. Thanks dyslexia. <br /><br />I did have a few follow up things about your comments.<br /><br />You said &quot;&gt;waste//<br />Might need smoe clarification. I think you mean garbage, but you might mean someone took a dump on her doorstep.&quot; <br />-The idea was that it was a dump, however it was worded so that the people who wouldn&#039;t pick up on that, and would likely be more offended, wouldn&#039;t see that as easily.<br /><br />you said &quot;&gt;Professor Snowflake//<br />It&#039;s a high school. They shouldn&#039;t have professors.&quot; <br />-Some schools in America actually do, usually they are professors at colleges part time but when that is the case they do sometimes go by professor. Additionally boarding schools, some private schools, and schools in other countries often have professors. As EQ isn&#039;t explicitly in America, and the type of school isn&#039;t explicitly stated, I took a liberty here.<br /><br />you wrote<br />&quot;&gt;I’m suppose to//<br />Verb form.&quot;<br />So it would be supposed?<br /><br />You said &quot;Less is often more.&quot; <br />-in reguars to Sunset being hurt. That&#039;s actually what I was going for, to an extent. I wanted to show her actually sharing her feelings with the diary, venting to it, and making it less impactful.<br /><br />&quot;You should replace those commas with dashes.&quot;<br />Rainbow Dash dashingly dashes through Dashing Dash&#039;s rainbow dashing dash course. Dashing rainbow like around dashing rainbow stallions over dashes of rainbow salt.<br /><br />You wrote,&quot;Twilight Sparkle Princess Twilight Sparkle//<br />Not sure what you were doing here.&quot;<br />- It didn&#039;t copy over correctly from gdocs, actually none of them have. Damnit. I&#039;m going back to fix all those by hand.<br /><br /><br />You said &quot;&gt;replacing the mascot uniform//<br />I guess I can&#039;t believe that Rarity wouldn&#039;t have done this long ago.&quot;<br />- I figure she wouldn&#039;t really have been anywhere with the mascot for a sports team.<br /><br />I think that&#039;s it. I&#039;ll resubmit when I can look over the more persistant issues.<br /><br />And thanks again for all your help. I know a lot of people don&#039;t treat pre-reader with the respect or thanks you deserve but you should know that a lot of us really do appreciate the work you do.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Mon, Mar 16th, 2015 05:55</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 357

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Fluttershy was being treated to an uncomfortably close-quarters view of her muzzle.//

It's best to avoid passive voice and "to be" verbs anyway, but especially where you're trying to establish action to hook the reader. Minor thing here, but the first part of this sentence is fixed in Fluttershy's perspective before you've mentioned her. They're little things, but they can add up.

>Fluttershy appeared unfazed.//

Well, I take that back. Now you've jumped into Twilight's perspective. You don't want to jerk the reader around like that. Even in an omniscient narration, where you can slide more easily between viewpoints, you still don't want to do so abruptly or unnecessarily often. However, you've chosen a limited narrator, so it's even harder to pull the perspective smoothly away from a character. It's a good idea with this type of narration to stick with a single character as much as possible and only switch to another when necessary for the plot or when only another character has critical information that nobody else could possibly know or figure out. You should probably decide which character you want holding the camera and try to stick to that. To another point: you don't want to make conclusion for the reader except when they're pretty mundane. The emotions on display here are critical to the story's punch, so you want to make her look and act unfazed, not just tell me she is. What's her posture, her facial expression?

>Twilight sighed. “Well then, I guess… I guess I disagree with her.”//

Look at how often you use this structure: Short piece of narration. "Speech." Mix it up a bit.

>The sighing was becoming a bit of a habit, she realised.//

Alrigh, you've established Twilight as the perspective character for the second scene. Let's see if it stays there.

>with a gleeful expression//

Show it to me. You're making me do the work.

>That’s very— oh//

Don't leave a space after an em dash.

>spend another evening with us any time soon. At least, not unless you want me to spend//

Watch repeating the same word in a close space.

>In the first place, Applejack//

Look how often these character use direct address. Then think about how often you do in a real conversation. It's not hard to follow the thread here. I can figure out who they're talking to fine.

>she added slyly//

For all the emotion packed into what she's saying, this is all I get of what she's doing? This doesn't even create a visual. There's a section at the top of this thread that discusses "talking heads." It'll explain why you shouldn't lose sight of the nonverbal parts of a conversation.

>looking at her expectantly//

Again, show me what this looks like. Adverbs are a red flag for telling. There's a discussion of show versus tell at the top of the thread, too.

>a little sharply//

Twilight still holds the perspective, so this is her judgment, but I'm not sure why she's noting it. Is Twilight surprised Applejack's taking this tone with Dash? Or surprised to see her this mad at all?

>(The unicorn shook her head frantically.)//

This isn't really a subjective enough narration to get away with parentheticals. For that matter, how does it change anything if you simply removed the parentheses.?

>which was eventually punctured by Twilight//

This sounds rather external to her now, since it sounds unexpected, which it wouldn't be for her. She was building up to it, after all. Unnecessary passive voice here, too.

>let’s get some shut-eye//

Huh? With all the mandatory activities in "Look Before You Sleep," she's really just going to have everyone go to bed already?

>per cent//

percent

>the large, somewhat plain room//

So where is it? And give me some more visual than that. I have nothing to picture here. You get to some scenery a little later, but not really the room itself.

>Rainbow had sulked a little when Twilight had vetoed the idea of holding the party in the throne room itself//

Why would she care?

>Twilight suppressed a giggle//

And nobody else reacts at all?

>Six sleeping bags, in the same colours as the bean bags, were lined up against the long far wall.//

You're using quite a lot of "to be" verbs lately. Make things more active. It's bringing the story's momentum to a halt.

>Firefly-lamps//

You don't need to hyphenate that. "Electric lamps" wouldn't be, for instance.

>one burning at close to maximum intensity and one on a medium setting//

How do fireflies manage that? I like Fluttershy calming them, but "setting" kind of implies a different mechanism.

>her wings beating as gently as she could manage//

Watch the perspective. Only Fluttershy knows what she can manage.

>(Applejack snorted.)//

Again, you don't need the parentheses. I see that you're probably trying to obey a rule where you don't have a character act in the same paragraph in which another speaks, but that's one that's easily justified in breaking. It's fine to do if the action is a direct response to what was said, and this is. You just don't want to do it all the time or get into a decoupled pattern where paragraph after paragraph contains X's actions but Y's speech. As little as you do this, it's fine.

>She grinned hugely//

You're really using a lot of those adverbs. This is really similar to a sentence about Twilight not long ago, too.

>squee//

Don't put sound effects in narration. At the least, you don't need the italics, but this is a pretty cliched word anyway.

>Twilight felt too frazzled even to attempt to find out//

With her as the perspective character, you sometimes have to go for a different kind of telling, like phrasing that the narrator uses. The narrator can get a bit tongue-tied and wonder what's going on for Twilight, and that carries the mood as well as using more standard means of showing.

>began to become apparent//

That's pretty redundant, especially with the "eventually" earlier. "Begin" actions are rarely necessary either. Writers tend to overuse them. It's best to save them for times when that beginning is significant, like if it's an abrupt change, or the action never finishes.

>It was some time later.//

Well, that's vague and unhelpful. The fact that there's a scene break cutting back to the same characters and setting already told me that.

>The ponies were arguing about what to do first.//

So let me see them doing this.

>Find-me-an-aspirin-right-now Game//

If you're going to capitalize that, get every word.

>There was a sudden silence in the room.//

If you do it right, you rarely have to use the word "sudden." It just is.

>looked at her friends for help. Applejack looked//

Word repetition, plus this paragraph is very telly.

>Pinkie gets the casting vote//

Deciding vote, yes? Or is this a British expression?

>fully-grown//

When the first word is an -ly adverb, you don't need the hyphen.

>“Get Tirekt!”//

Um… Memes like this don't age well. You can keep it if you want, but it'll lose its humor value pretty quickly, if it hasn't already.

>Just me and you, one round each.//

Why not let everyone play? She can make it so Tirek and Twilight can only choose each other, but they shouldn't leave everyone else out.

>Twilight looked stricken.//

Let me see it.

>A pause.//

Why do writers like to do this so much? This is nothing. Without seeing what happens during it, it means nothing.

>I guess— //

No space after the em dash.

>the hoof was removed//

Pretty clunky passive voice there.

>wearing an expression of utter bliss and giggling slightly as she rocked back and forth//

She'd been your perspective character, yet this feels very external to her. For that matter, except for the very beginning of the scene, it's felt more omniscient. If you want to make the whole thing that way, fine, but it should be consistent. If you want limited, then have the narrator poke his head in here and there to keep it going.

>Tirek looked disgusted.//

How so?

>Do you not even think of what I suffered so many moons ago from Firefly and her companions?//

Probably not the best assumption that readers will know this canon.

>Tirek smirked a third time, and lowered his voice.//

That's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>Crystals//

So, what, is he acting like Sombra to piss them off, or is Sombra there, too?

I liked the story, and despite the possibly intimidating length of the feedback, these are mostly pretty easy things to fix. What might take a bit of thought is the ending. This doesn't come to any sort of conclusion. It ends on a weak and somewhat confusing joke, but it doesn't make any larger point, resolve a conflict, or show character growth. What is it you want the reader to take away from this. Just the joke? Then write a joke book. Give the story some meaning. Who changes? Who learns something? Who achieves something?

This story was mechanically cleaner than the bulk of what I see, the characters were fun, and the plot was good until the end. I'd love to see you put that last touch on it so I can send it up for posting.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy was being treated to an uncomfortably close-quarters view of her muzzle.//</span><br />It&#039;s best to avoid passive voice and &quot;to be&quot; verbs anyway, but especially where you&#039;re trying to establish action to hook the reader. Minor thing here, but the first part of this sentence is fixed in Fluttershy&#039;s perspective before you&#039;ve mentioned her. They&#039;re little things, but they can add up.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fluttershy appeared unfazed.//</span><br />Well, I take that back. Now you&#039;ve jumped into Twilight&#039;s perspective. You don&#039;t want to jerk the reader around like that. Even in an omniscient narration, where you can slide more easily between viewpoints, you still don&#039;t want to do so abruptly or unnecessarily often. However, you&#039;ve chosen a limited narrator, so it&#039;s even harder to pull the perspective smoothly away from a character. It&#039;s a good idea with this type of narration to stick with a single character as much as possible and only switch to another when necessary for the plot or when only another character has critical information that nobody else could possibly know or figure out. You should probably decide which character you want holding the camera and try to stick to that. To another point: you don&#039;t want to make conclusion for the reader except when they&#039;re pretty mundane. The emotions on display here are critical to the story&#039;s punch, so you want to make her look and act unfazed, not just tell me she is. What&#039;s her posture, her facial expression?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight sighed. “Well then, I guess… I guess I disagree with her.”//</span><br />Look at how often you use this structure: Short piece of narration. &quot;Speech.&quot; Mix it up a bit.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The sighing was becoming a bit of a habit, she realised.//</span><br />Alrigh, you&#039;ve established Twilight as the perspective character for the second scene. Let&#039;s see if it stays there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with a gleeful expression//</span><br />Show it to me. You&#039;re making me do the work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That’s very— oh//</span><br />Don&#039;t leave a space after an em dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;spend another evening with us any time soon. At least, not unless you want me to spend//</span><br />Watch repeating the same word in a close space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;In the first place, Applejack//</span><br />Look how often these character use direct address. Then think about how often you do in a real conversation. It&#039;s not hard to follow the thread here. I can figure out who they&#039;re talking to fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she added slyly//</span><br />For all the emotion packed into what she&#039;s saying, this is all I get of what she&#039;s doing? This doesn&#039;t even create a visual. There&#039;s a section at the top of this thread that discusses &quot;talking heads.&quot; It&#039;ll explain why you shouldn&#039;t lose sight of the nonverbal parts of a conversation.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking at her expectantly//</span><br />Again, show me what this looks like. Adverbs are a red flag for telling. There&#039;s a discussion of show versus tell at the top of the thread, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a little sharply//</span><br />Twilight still holds the perspective, so this is her judgment, but I&#039;m not sure why she&#039;s noting it. Is Twilight surprised Applejack&#039;s taking this tone with Dash? Or surprised to see her this mad at all?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(The unicorn shook her head frantically.)//</span><br />This isn&#039;t really a subjective enough narration to get away with parentheticals. For that matter, how does it change anything if you simply removed the parentheses.?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;which was eventually punctured by Twilight//</span><br />This sounds rather external to her now, since it sounds unexpected, which it wouldn&#039;t be for her. She was building up to it, after all. Unnecessary passive voice here, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;let’s get some shut-eye//</span><br />Huh? With all the mandatory activities in &quot;Look Before You Sleep,&quot; she&#039;s really just going to have everyone go to bed already?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;per cent//</span><br />percent<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the large, somewhat plain room//</span><br />So where is it? And give me some more visual than that. I have nothing to picture here. You get to some scenery a little later, but not really the room itself.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Rainbow had sulked a little when Twilight had vetoed the idea of holding the party in the throne room itself//</span><br />Why would she care?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight suppressed a giggle//</span><br />And nobody else reacts at all?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Six sleeping bags, in the same colours as the bean bags, were lined up against the long far wall.//</span><br />You&#039;re using quite a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs lately. Make things more active. It&#039;s bringing the story&#039;s momentum to a halt.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Firefly-lamps//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to hyphenate that. &quot;Electric lamps&quot; wouldn&#039;t be, for instance.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;one burning at close to maximum intensity and one on a medium setting//</span><br />How do fireflies manage that? I like Fluttershy calming them, but &quot;setting&quot; kind of implies a different mechanism.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her wings beating as gently as she could manage//</span><br />Watch the perspective. Only Fluttershy knows what she can manage.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;(Applejack snorted.)//</span><br />Again, you don&#039;t need the parentheses. I see that you&#039;re probably trying to obey a rule where you don&#039;t have a character act in the same paragraph in which another speaks, but that&#039;s one that&#039;s easily justified in breaking. It&#039;s fine to do if the action is a direct response to what was said, and this is. You just don&#039;t want to do it all the time or get into a decoupled pattern where paragraph after paragraph contains X&#039;s actions but Y&#039;s speech. As little as you do this, it&#039;s fine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She grinned hugely//</span><br />You&#039;re really using a lot of those adverbs. This is really similar to a sentence about Twilight not long ago, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;squee//</span><br />Don&#039;t put sound effects in narration. At the least, you don&#039;t need the italics, but this is a pretty cliched word anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight felt too frazzled even to attempt to find out//</span><br />With her as the perspective character, you sometimes have to go for a different kind of telling, like phrasing that the narrator uses. The narrator can get a bit tongue-tied and wonder what&#039;s going on for Twilight, and that carries the mood as well as using more standard means of showing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;began to become apparent//</span><br />That&#039;s pretty redundant, especially with the &quot;eventually&quot; earlier. &quot;Begin&quot; actions are rarely necessary either. Writers tend to overuse them. It&#039;s best to save them for times when that beginning is significant, like if it&#039;s an abrupt change, or the action never finishes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was some time later.//</span><br />Well, that&#039;s vague and unhelpful. The fact that there&#039;s a scene break cutting back to the same characters and setting already told me that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The ponies were arguing about what to do first.//</span><br />So let me see them doing this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Find-me-an-aspirin-right-now Game//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to capitalize that, get every word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There was a sudden silence in the room.//</span><br />If you do it right, you rarely have to use the word &quot;sudden.&quot; It just is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looked at her friends for help. Applejack looked//</span><br />Word repetition, plus this paragraph is very telly.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Pinkie gets the casting vote//</span><br />Deciding vote, yes? Or is this a British expression?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fully-grown//</span><br />When the first word is an -ly adverb, you don&#039;t need the hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“Get Tirekt!”//</span><br />Um… Memes like this don&#039;t age well. You can keep it if you want, but it&#039;ll lose its humor value pretty quickly, if it hasn&#039;t already.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Just me and you, one round each.//</span><br />Why not let everyone play? She can make it so Tirek and Twilight can only choose each other, but they shouldn&#039;t leave everyone else out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Twilight looked stricken.//</span><br />Let me see it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A pause.//</span><br />Why do writers like to do this so much? This is nothing. Without seeing what happens during it, it means nothing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I guess— //</span><br />No space after the em dash.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the hoof was removed//</span><br />Pretty clunky passive voice there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;wearing an expression of utter bliss and giggling slightly as she rocked back and forth//</span><br />She&#039;d been your perspective character, yet this feels very external to her. For that matter, except for the very beginning of the scene, it&#039;s felt more omniscient. If you want to make the whole thing that way, fine, but it should be consistent. If you want limited, then have the narrator poke his head in here and there to keep it going.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tirek looked disgusted.//</span><br />How so?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Do you not even think of what I suffered so many moons ago from Firefly and her companions?//</span><br />Probably not the best assumption that readers will know this canon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Tirek smirked a third time, and lowered his voice.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. You don&#039;t need the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Crystals//</span><br />So, what, is he acting like Sombra to piss them off, or is Sombra there, too?<br /><br />I liked the story, and despite the possibly intimidating length of the feedback, these are mostly pretty easy things to fix. What might take a bit of thought is the ending. This doesn&#039;t come to any sort of conclusion. It ends on a weak and somewhat confusing joke, but it doesn&#039;t make any larger point, resolve a conflict, or show character growth. What is it you want the reader to take away from this. Just the joke? Then write a joke book. Give the story some meaning. Who changes? Who learns something? Who achieves something?<br /><br />This story was mechanically cleaner than the bulk of what I see, the characters were fun, and the plot was good until the end. I&#039;d love to see you put that last touch on it so I can send it up for posting.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 358

>>132143
>So it would be supposed?
Yes.

>You said "Less is often more."

I was referring not so much to what she writes, but more to how badly beaten up she is. The point gets made either way, whether she's on death's doorstep or mildly bruised, so going for the extreme bad end of things can be counterproductive.

As to going third-person…

It can work. I think maybe that's something you should have considered when you decided to make it exclusively an epistolary story, then later decided you had to back off from that. Because now it opens the door to the possibility of putting third-person scenes throughout, which I'm not going to ask you to do.

I wrote an epistolary as well, and I got the complaint in a comment that a reader wanted to see a live interaction, and all I can say is that 's a limitation of the format. There are ways of writing it so that you don't need that type of interaction, but there will always be readers who still want it.

If it's a sudden ending, that's not necessarily a bad thing. She may come to a sudden realization that her relationship with the diary has changed, after all. As long as it feels natural for the story, it's fine, but then that's the trick, isn't it?<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132143" onclick="return highlight('132143', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132143">&gt;&gt;132143</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So it would be supposed?</span><br />Yes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;You said &quot;Less is often more.&quot;</span><br />I was referring not so much to what she writes, but more to how badly beaten up she is. The point gets made either way, whether she&#039;s on death&#039;s doorstep or mildly bruised, so going for the extreme bad end of things can be counterproductive.<br /><br />As to going third-person…<br /><br />It can work. I think maybe that&#039;s something you should have considered when you decided to make it exclusively an epistolary story, then later decided you had to back off from that. Because now it opens the door to the possibility of putting third-person scenes throughout, which I&#039;m not going to ask you to do.<br /><br />I wrote an epistolary as well, and I got the complaint in a comment that a reader wanted to see a live interaction, and all I can say is that &#039;s a limitation of the format. There are ways of writing it so that you don&#039;t need that type of interaction, but there will always be readers who still want it.<br /><br />If it&#039;s a sudden ending, that&#039;s not necessarily a bad thing. She may come to a sudden realization that her relationship with the diary has changed, after all. As long as it feels natural for the story, it&#039;s fine, but then that&#039;s the trick, isn&#039;t it?<br />

LoganberryCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 359

>>132147 First of all, thank you very much. I wasn't expecting this level of feedback, and I really appreciate it.

I won't reply to much, since most of what you said seems pretty straightforward. Also, I have almost no *chan experience, so I'm bound to get things horribly wrong if I do. I'll just respond to a few things:

>Look how often these character use direct address. Then think about how often you do in a real conversation.

Oddly enough, *I* probably *would* do so if I were in that sort of a mood. Though that doesn't get me off the hook when I make *Rarity* do it, so I'm not arguing with you!

>Why would she care?

Because she thinks the throne room is a much more awesome place than some rather bare side room. Again, not an argument, since I haven't established that in the story.

>Deciding vote, yes? Or is this a British expression?

I wasn't aware that "casting vote" was a Briticism – but it's certainly a fairly common expression in the UK. I know Google hit counts are fairly pointless, but for the bbc.co.uk domain "casting vote" beats "deciding vote" by about 2:1. Still, if "deciding vote" is more widely understood, then I don't object to changing it here.

>So, what, is he acting like Sombra to piss them off, or is Sombra there, too?

The first. The idea is that Tirek is suggesting using light-emitting crystals – though he's doing so in a deliberately annoying and provocative way. I guess that wasn't clear.

>What might take a bit of thought is the ending.

The section that started here was the only real "punch in the gut" moment for me, I think – and that isn't a complaint, because I think everything you said was fair. I don't personally think the joke is weak *in itself*, but I *do* agree that it's not enough for the climactic scene of this story.

So, plenty for me to chew on. Quite a few things I can fix quickly, plus one more substantial thing that I'll need to go away and think about for a while. I *do* intend to do this and resubmit in the future, though. Thanks again for the very useful feedback.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132147" onclick="return highlight('132147', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132147">&gt;&gt;132147</a> First of all, thank you very much. I wasn&#039;t expecting this level of feedback, and I really appreciate it.<br /><br />I won&#039;t reply to much, since most of what you said seems pretty straightforward. Also, I have almost no *chan experience, so I&#039;m bound to get things horribly wrong if I do. I&#039;ll just respond to a few things:<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Look how often these character use direct address. Then think about how often you do in a real conversation.</span><br />Oddly enough, *I* probably *would* do so if I were in that sort of a mood. Though that doesn&#039;t get me off the hook when I make *Rarity* do it, so I&#039;m not arguing with you!<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Why would she care?</span><br />Because she thinks the throne room is a much more awesome place than some rather bare side room. Again, not an argument, since I haven&#039;t established that in the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Deciding vote, yes? Or is this a British expression?</span><br />I wasn&#039;t aware that &quot;casting vote&quot; was a Briticism – but it&#039;s certainly a fairly common expression in the UK. I know Google hit counts are fairly pointless, but for the bbc.co.uk domain &quot;casting vote&quot; beats &quot;deciding vote&quot; by about 2:1. Still, if &quot;deciding vote&quot; is more widely understood, then I don&#039;t object to changing it here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;So, what, is he acting like Sombra to piss them off, or is Sombra there, too?</span><br />The first. The idea is that Tirek is suggesting using light-emitting crystals – though he&#039;s doing so in a deliberately annoying and provocative way. I guess that wasn&#039;t clear.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;What might take a bit of thought is the ending.</span><br />The section that started here was the only real &quot;punch in the gut&quot; moment for me, I think – and that isn&#039;t a complaint, because I think everything you said was fair. I don&#039;t personally think the joke is weak *in itself*, but I *do* agree that it&#039;s not enough for the climactic scene of this story.<br /><br />So, plenty for me to chew on. Quite a few things I can fix quickly, plus one more substantial thing that I&#039;ll need to go away and think about for a while. I *do* intend to do this and resubmit in the future, though. Thanks again for the very useful feedback.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 360

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

This is a pretty uninspiring beginning. Watching the sunset and lamenting the court business of the day has happened at the beginning of countless stories so far. It's fine to want to set this mood, but you have to go about it in a really evocative mood or from a new angle. This one isn't doing anything different.

>Among those whom had retired//

Who. It's the subject of the noun clause "who had retired."

>her eyes laden with boredom//

Don't tell me she's bored. Make her look and act bored. What would an actor do to look bored? Have her do the same things. I'll draw the conclusion of boredom myself from your description of her, if you do it right.

>It was a plot of buildings lit up and bustling with life; a little square of commotion and energy.//

Misued semicolon. There isn't an independent clause after it.

>a commons area//

Either a commons or a common area.

>those that wish to hear the tales//

"Those" refers to ponies, so they're a "who," not a "that."

>She smiled recanting the younger days//

Set off the participle with a comma. And surely you mean "recounting."

>as she considered how the times had changed since then//

And we don't get to see any of it? Why mention it at all if you're going to keep it so vague?

>Plaza//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this. it really shouldn't be, unless it's the only one in town or so prominent that anyone hearing a reference to the word alone would know unequivocally which one.

>with glee//

Let me see this. Phrases like this are one of the red flags for telling. There's a short discussion of "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>The cobblestone and wood finishes brought back thoughts of the past.//

This is the second or third time already you mention her thinking about the past, but you never expand on it at all.

>Everypony seemed to be enjoying themselves.//

You haven't been bad about it in general, but there are a lot of "to be" verbs in this paragraph. It's briging the action to a halt.

>nic-nacs//

knickknacks

>He was taller than most stallions.//

Then what about him made her call him a young stallion? Nothing in the description makes him seem young.

>excitedly turn back to the plaza//

Verb form. (And telly. And inconsistent capitalization of "plaza" again.)

>turning into a drunken chant by a group of stallions at the front of the bar//

This is located so far from what it describes that it seems to refer to the door or to Luna.

>ha-ir!” they sang, a white earth pony appearing to lead them on, “Flowing//

As punctuated, those two parts of the quote form a continuous sentence, but they don't. I see this is another recurring problem.

>Luna looked around curiously, the tavern had a medieval theme//

Comma splice.

>each with its own unique coat of arms//

Does this refer to the walls or the shields?

>den of inequity//

iniquity

>I shalt//

If you're going to use archaic language, please get it right.

>Making her way over, she finally took a seat, looking about the room.//

Another danger of participles: they synchronize actions, so you have to be aware of that. Here, she does all three things at the same time, where it's more reasonable to have them in sequence, or perhaps the last two could be simultaneous.

That song may be a little risque for what we can post on the blog.

>Good e’en milady//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>through which a beady black eye shone through//

Redundant "through."

>‘a//

The elision for "of" would be "o'." But note that when you do have aleading apostrophe, smart quotes get it backward. You'll need to past in one the right way on those.

>but she knew that nopony had ever charted those waters, there was no need to with the Eastern trade routes working as they were//

Comma splice.

You're inconsistent at placing a space after an ellipsis.

>ok//

okay

>SLAM//

Just use the regular word or describe the sound. Don't Put sound effects in narration.

>her name being called by her sister//

You unnecessarily use passive voice like this at times.

>to where she suspected Luna lay//

Wait, the last paragraph was from Luna's perspective. Why are you in Celestia's now?

>her sisters sudden yelling//

Missing an apostrophe.

>jus-//

Use a proper dash for cutoffs, not a hyphen.

Alright, I'm going to stop here. Pretty much everything I've marked so far occurs multiple times. Aside from the niggling mechanical issues, the big items are:

-Overuse of telly language.
-Relative abundance of "to be" verbs.
-Incorrect usage of archaic speech.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />This is a pretty uninspiring beginning. Watching the sunset and lamenting the court business of the day has happened at the beginning of countless stories so far. It&#039;s fine to want to set this mood, but you have to go about it in a really evocative mood or from a new angle. This one isn&#039;t doing anything different.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Among those whom had retired//</span><br />Who. It&#039;s the subject of the noun clause &quot;who had retired.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyes laden with boredom//</span><br />Don&#039;t tell me she&#039;s bored. Make her look and act bored. What would an actor do to look bored? Have her do the same things. I&#039;ll draw the conclusion of boredom myself from your description of her, if you do it right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It was a plot of buildings lit up and bustling with life; a little square of commotion and energy.//</span><br />Misued semicolon. There isn&#039;t an independent clause after it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a commons area//</span><br />Either a commons or a common area.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;those that wish to hear the tales//</span><br />&quot;Those&quot; refers to ponies, so they&#039;re a &quot;who,&quot; not a &quot;that.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She smiled recanting the younger days//</span><br />Set off the participle with a comma. And surely you mean &quot;recounting.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;as she considered how the times had changed since then//</span><br />And we don&#039;t get to see any of it? Why mention it at all if you&#039;re going to keep it so vague?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Plaza//</span><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at capitalizing this. it really shouldn&#039;t be, unless it&#039;s the only one in town or so prominent that anyone hearing a reference to the word alone would know unequivocally which one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with glee//</span><br />Let me see this. Phrases like this are one of the red flags for telling. There&#039;s a short discussion of &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The cobblestone and wood finishes brought back thoughts of the past.//</span><br />This is the second or third time already you mention her thinking about the past, but you never expand on it at all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everypony seemed to be enjoying themselves.//</span><br />You haven&#039;t been bad about it in general, but there are a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs in this paragraph. It&#039;s briging the action to a halt.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;nic-nacs//</span><br />knickknacks<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He was taller than most stallions.//</span><br />Then what about him made her call him a young stallion? Nothing in the description makes him seem young.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;excitedly turn back to the plaza//</span><br />Verb form. (And telly. And inconsistent capitalization of &quot;plaza&quot; again.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;turning into a drunken chant by a group of stallions at the front of the bar//</span><br />This is located so far from what it describes that it seems to refer to the door or to Luna.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ha-ir!” they sang, a white earth pony appearing to lead them on, “Flowing//</span><br />As punctuated, those two parts of the quote form a continuous sentence, but they don&#039;t. I see this is another recurring problem.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Luna looked around curiously, the tavern had a medieval theme//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;each with its own unique coat of arms//</span><br />Does this refer to the walls or the shields?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;den of inequity//</span><br />iniquity<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I shalt//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to use archaic language, please get it right.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Making her way over, she finally took a seat, looking about the room.//</span><br />Another danger of participles: they synchronize actions, so you have to be aware of that. Here, she does all three things at the same time, where it&#039;s more reasonable to have them in sequence, or perhaps the last two could be simultaneous.<br /><br />That song may be a little risque for what we can post on the blog.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Good e’en milady//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;through which a beady black eye shone through//</span><br />Redundant &quot;through.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘a//</span><br />The elision for &quot;of&quot; would be &quot;o&#039;.&quot; But note that when you do have aleading apostrophe, smart quotes get it backward. You&#039;ll need to past in one the right way on those.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but she knew that nopony had ever charted those waters, there was no need to with the Eastern trade routes working as they were//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br />You&#039;re inconsistent at placing a space after an ellipsis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ok//</span><br />okay<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;SLAM//</span><br />Just use the regular word or describe the sound. Don&#039;t Put sound effects in narration.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her name being called by her sister//</span><br />You unnecessarily use passive voice like this at times.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;to where she suspected Luna lay//</span><br />Wait, the last paragraph was from Luna&#039;s perspective. Why are you in Celestia&#039;s now?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her sisters sudden yelling//</span><br />Missing an apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;jus-//</span><br />Use a proper dash for cutoffs, not a hyphen.<br /><br />Alright, I&#039;m going to stop here. Pretty much everything I&#039;ve marked so far occurs multiple times. Aside from the niggling mechanical issues, the big items are:<br /><br />-Overuse of telly language.<br />-Relative abundance of &quot;to be&quot; verbs.<br />-Incorrect usage of archaic speech.<br />

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 361

>>132131
>"Her," not "their." I know it's become acceptable to use that as a singular, but there's no reason to obscure the stranger's gender, and as this story is trying to sound ancient, it wouldn't follow modern practices anyway.

The stranger's gender is obscured because the characters don't know it. The story is being told to a modern audience, so it's unlikely its grammar would not have changed or been updated at all. I also thought it added to the fairy tale feel to make incidental characters less detailed; Tiamat is the only character who gets proper description, which reflects her importance. The sisters don't get any because who they are is heavily implied even with a brief descriptor.

For the last section, I separated it into its own chapter and labelled it "Epilogue". I had thought the horizontal rule made the perspective shift clear enough, but apparantly not.

I'll admit the last part is the one I had most concerns about. The story seemed flat without some context, however, and the nature of fairy tales seemed the sort of thing Celestia would think a lot about. Her last comment isn't intended to be sarcastic in the least; I added an extra line to make clear she's sincere.

I could cut it completely (and I considered that), and it wouldn't really affect the story's progression much, but then the opening section could be cut for the same reasons. They help ground the story in modern Equestria, even if they don't relate much to the plot of the fairy tale.

Otherwise, I thought most of your critique was apt; thank you for taking the time to nitpick my story :)

cp<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132131" onclick="return highlight('132131', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132131">&gt;&gt;132131</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;&quot;Her,&quot; not &quot;their.&quot; I know it&#039;s become acceptable to use that as a singular, but there&#039;s no reason to obscure the stranger&#039;s gender, and as this story is trying to sound ancient, it wouldn&#039;t follow modern practices anyway.</span><br /><br />The stranger&#039;s gender is obscured because the characters don&#039;t know it. The story is being told to a modern audience, so it&#039;s unlikely its grammar would not have changed or been updated at all. I also thought it added to the fairy tale feel to make incidental characters less detailed; Tiamat is the only character who gets proper description, which reflects her importance. The sisters don&#039;t get any because who they are is heavily implied even with a brief descriptor.<br /><br />For the last section, I separated it into its own chapter and labelled it &quot;Epilogue&quot;. I had thought the horizontal rule made the perspective shift clear enough, but apparantly not.<br /><br />I&#039;ll admit the last part is the one I had most concerns about. The story seemed flat without some context, however, and the nature of fairy tales seemed the sort of thing Celestia would think a lot about. Her last comment isn&#039;t intended to be sarcastic in the least; I added an extra line to make clear she&#039;s sincere.<br /><br />I could cut it completely (and I considered that), and it wouldn&#039;t really affect the story&#039;s progression much, but then the opening section could be cut for the same reasons. They help ground the story in modern Equestria, even if they don&#039;t relate much to the plot of the fairy tale.<br /><br />Otherwise, I thought most of your critique was apt; thank you for taking the time to nitpick my story :)<br /><br />cp<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 362

>>132157
>The stranger's gender is obscured because the characters don't know it. The story is being told to a modern audience, so it's unlikely its grammar would not have changed or been updated at all.//
This is pretty much my point, regarding the grammar. When originally recorded, the story probably would have used "his" (or "hers" as this might be a female-dominated society), so it's unlikely they'd update it with a more modern "their." And as to the characters not knowing… that's not really how this is being told. The story-in-story isn't taking a limited narration that would be restricted to what any particular character could know. It's an omniscient narrator, essentially Celestia, who does know, and as it never ends up mattering what gender this stranger is, it feels odd to deliberately obscure it.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132157" onclick="return highlight('132157', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132157">&gt;&gt;132157</a><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stranger&#039;s gender is obscured because the characters don&#039;t know it. The story is being told to a modern audience, so it&#039;s unlikely its grammar would not have changed or been updated at all.//</span><br />This is pretty much my point, regarding the grammar. When originally recorded, the story probably would have used &quot;his&quot; (or &quot;hers&quot; as this might be a female-dominated society), so it&#039;s unlikely they&#039;d update it with a more modern &quot;their.&quot; And as to the characters not knowing… that&#039;s not really how this is being told. The story-in-story isn&#039;t taking a limited narration that would be restricted to what any particular character could know. It&#039;s an omniscient narrator, essentially Celestia, who <i>does</i> know, and as it never ends up mattering what gender this stranger is, it feels odd to deliberately obscure it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 363

Note that this list is not necessarily comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Canterlot library//

Is that the official name? Then capitalize both.

>symphonies and ballads and threnodies//

Wow, you sure went obscure quick. The only threnody I can think of is part of John Ireland's Concertino Pastorale. Most readers will have no idea what one is, though I'm glad you gave ample context to give them all they really need to know about it. What I'd suggest is this: 1) keep it simple and pick yet another choice that most people have at least heard of, then give the list a sequence from grand to intimate or most to least familiar; or 2) pick a few more terms of varied obscurity and string them out, again in order, to lead the reader there. I will caution you, though, make sure the character is one who'd have an advanced enough knowledge of music to use these terms. I haven't read far enough in to see yet.

>leather-bound//

As in the tanned hides of dead sentient cows?

>But in my gut, it exists, or did at one point.//

I think you could stand to ground this better in what fascinates her about it. All I get is a vague description of the drawing, and she didn't seem so drawn to it. She says she is, but I don't have the evidence of that. An example speaks far louder than a generality.

>There’s a discordant thrum of several strings not meant to be played together//

Musically speaking, there's no such thing, so this would have to be grounded in her own musical preferences, yet I have no idea what those are. Depending on the state of their music, this could be three consecutive notes together, a tri-tone, something not in a pentatonic scale, etc.

>the ripped cushions propel my body towards the front door//

This just sounds weird. How do the cushions propel her?

>Without even thinking, a thick winter jacket and a golden scarf wrap themselves around me.//

This says that the jacket and coat weren't thinking. While accurate, it's not exactly surprising or informative.

>My horn glimmers and the door to my cabin opens.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Slamming the door shut, I trot out into the dense snow.//

Note that participles mean simultaneous action, so the slams the door at the same time she's trotting into the snow, while it's more likely they happen in sequence.

>It would be entirely unlike her to frighten others on purpose.//

This isn't bad, but there are a lot of instances where you have "to be" verbs that you could easily remove by rephrasing. "I'd never known her to do something like this," as a simple example. You do have a fair number of boring "to be" verbs, and you could stand to use more active language to keep things moving.

>I have to look down again//

She never looked up, unless she's been doing so since before she left the house.

>I summon up the willpower to keep moving forward.//

This tripped me up a little because of what it follows. I didn't know whether she was actually doing this, or if it was continuing her comment, and she was saying this is how she normally behaves in the event of an adventure.

>Then I smack myself//

None of her commentary, gets to a mood of her feeling foolish, so this seems out of place.

>Something was waiting for me up ahead in the frozen undergrowth.//

Why go to past tense here?

>it is my civil duty//

The story reads more like she's going out there due to curiosity, not concern. It could use punching up a bit, one way or the other. Either make it so she takes this angle sooner and more consistently, if it's true, or have her sound like she's bluffing if this is just a rationalization on her part. The last line of the paragraph sells it some, but it sounds more like she's trying to overcome her trepidation than making excuses for why she should keep going.

>Fire shoots out of its belly and I leap backwards//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>eyes widening of their own accord//

Using such formal language in conjunction with attributing the action to a body part, serves to externalize this and take away its sense of immediacy. If she's truly surprised, she doesn't have time to wax eloquent about it.

>All of the snow has melted around it, and the ground is scarred from where it walked.//

Look how calm she sounds here. Then compare it to how she sounded at the end of the previous scene. It feels inconsistent.

>But something seemed off.//

Why past tense?

>Inching a bit closer, it is obvious that this monster is, in fact, a monster.//

Dangling participle. "Inching a bit closer" should describe her, but she never appears. It describes what ever abstract concept "it" refers to.

>Not something I’d like to be close to, if at all possible.//

I gather that maybe she sounds less afraid in this scene because she's drawn to whatever this is? Let that come through. Make her narration sound like she feels this compelling tug to go forward.

>ship//

How does she decide that's what it is? There's nothing in the description to make me think that's what it is.

>My hoof stops a half-inch above where I thought the surface to be, and I realize it’s a button.//

Rephrase slightly. "It" has no antecedent here.

>behemoth//

You already used that word, and not long ago. It's unusual enough that it sticks out like a sore thumb.

>Hooking my limbs around the lip of the newly opened portal, I manage to pull myself up onto the slick steel.//

Another case where the participle tends to synchronize things that probably shouldn't be.

> Lowering myself over the edge and into the container itself, two doorways make themselves apparent.//

Another dangling participle. It says that the doorways lowered her into the container. You're using quite a few participial phrases lately, too.

>dimly lit//

Kind of an oxymoronic phrase that's seen as cliched.

>There’s nothing to be afraid of here.//

But she doesn't sound afraid. She sounds almost… monotone? Which might actually be effective here, if she's in a trance-like state, though it could stand to be a little more obvious.

>Thump.//

Eh. It's frowned upon to put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

>They don’t budge from their spots, no matter how hard I pull them.//

Basically I think you need to decide how she should sound and why. Is she distant and entranced? Or is she curious and excited? As it is, the narration's kind of bland, which works for the former, except it's not obvious or consistently so.

>There are a series of clicks//

Number disagreement. "Series" is singular here.

>Racing back, I pull the ponies towards the entrance to the machine.//

Synchronization again.

>Various pieces of something hit the outside of the ship and smoke fills the interior.//

Needs a comma.

>I’m choking. I have to save these ponies.//

Again, without an atmosphere that she has dulled thoughts and a compulsion to act, these just come across as emotionless. An exclamation mark, some more emphatic phrasing… well, starting with the next sentence, there you go. This sets the mood much better.

>I run as quickly as I can.//

She doesn't mention the weight of them. Isn't she having some difficulty pulling them along?

>The inside of my eyelids are red.//

Number disagreement: inside -> are.

>The covers fly off me and I step onto the floor.//

Needs a comma.

>Stamping my hooves against the well-worn doormat, I rummage through the cabinets until I spy a square of silk mesh.//

Synchronization.

>Neither of them say anything.//

"Neither" takes the number of the items it refers to, and they're both singular, so "says."

>these creatures//

The previous night, she was convinced that were ponies. What made her change her mind?

>I need to control my stuttering.//

But she didn't stutter, nor is there any evidence that she's prone to.

>It touches my head lightly runs the appendages through my mane//

Missing comma or word.

>The first barks loudly and its shoulders shake up and down.//

Needs a comma.

>Are they talking about me? Something about them feels familiar…//

Maybe could use a slight rephrasing to avoid the repetition of "about."

>I prance in place when I hear light steps from inside pitter-pattering their way over to the entrance.//

See, her actions get across her mood, but not the manner in which they're presented. Let the tone of the narration carry it as well.

>My magic engulfs it and I pull the book towards me, scanning the cover.//

Needs a comma.

>Nothing in the way of a title; only a picture of a pony’s head, mouth wide open, the edges pulled upward in a jubilant smile.//

A semicolon really does call for a formalism of structure, but there aren't any independent clauses here.

>He bats his eyelids and I ruffle his spines.//

Needs a comma. It also seems odd that she knows him well enough to do that. It's not supported in canon or built up in the story.

>Oh, imagine if knowledge about the two creatures on my sofa was made public!//

For hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: if knowledge… were made public.

>I pull the winter garments off//

I'd use "my" garments. This sounds a bit off.

>A shade of brilliant blue lies above me and I barely notice it.//

Needs a comma.

>A soft breeze plays over my back and I hum to myself as I compose the first movement of the spell.//

Needs a comma. This actually has me intrigued, but I think it could stand to be a little more concrete. Is she referring to it as a movement because she just thinks of it that way, or does she actually incorporate music into her spellcasting?

>The field fades and I’m back in my rustic cabin, mere inches from the book.//

>The creatures are upside-down and they stare at me without saying anything.//
>The creature shrieks a name I can’t pronounce and I leap backwards//
Needs a comma.

>The second one sheds its helmet and I’m surprised at how similar the humans look.//

Needs a comma, and why is she still using "it" when they've already been identified as male?

>with excitement//

These prepositional phrases of emotional exposition are rarely necessary and almost always redundant with information that's already presented.

>We left it ages ago, I didn’t think there’d be a trace left of the old thing!//

Comma splice.

>That wasn’t a ship//

Then why'd she call it one? (iirc, I pointed that out in an earlier comment.)

>a few question//

Typo.

>“fingers” on their “hands”//

Now, this always bugs me when humans turn up. They really don't have any analog for this? Not Spike's claws or Tirek's hands? Discord's paw? Iron Will's hands?

>Supplies will be gathered tomorrow//

Needs a comma after this, but I don't see the advantage of passive voice here. It just sounds odd. And supplies for what?

>onboard//

on board

>I feel like a filly again, listening to my parents argue; always frightening, never fruitful.//

Misused semicolon.

>We’ll take over and then the planet will go to pieces for a second time!”//

>The desperation in his voice is palpable and it echoes across the wooden floor.//
Needs a comma.

>I turn over, feigning sleep, and watch as he turns//

Watch the repetition of "turn."

>bangs as the globe falls out of the second brother’s grasp and clatters//

I'm not sure if either of those sounds works well for a large wooden object.

>I can’t bring myself to meet his eyes so I stare at the body in front of me.//

Needs a comma.

Okay, that ending. I don't mind it at all for what happens. I do think it suffers from a lack of implication, though. I'm not sure what Lyra intends to do about any of this. Hide the body in her house? Sneak it out and bury it somewhere? And why can't she trust Twilight? She never says. I certainly think Twilight would handle it well, though you could write Lyra such that she doesn't think so.

And it needs a little more as to why Lyra says she can't trust this human and what that entails. He acted in Equestria's interest, and based on his argument, it's reasonable to think he'd continue to, though he'd also have a loyalty to his brother, and he turned against him.

So will she try to track this human down in the woods and kill him? Does she think he's dangerous enough to make that necessary? And if she truly doesn't trust any other ponies with the knowledge, she'd have to do it herself.

Basically, it isn't leading anywhere, or if the idea is to leave it open-ended, it's not attaching much emotional investment to the various options. As is kind of symptomatic of a lot of the story, Lyra's reaction is pretty bland. She's witnessed a murder (how unheard of in Equestrian society is this anyway?) and doesn't do anything, but she still seems to be thinking clearly.

The big thing I'd like to see here is more emotional consistency in the narration, or if you're setting off times she gets distant for some reason, make that come through as well. Usually, something like getting distracted or zoning out would connote getting mesmerized like that, but I don't get the feel that's what you were going for. So either give me more emotional cues, particularly in how the narration is worded and presented, or make those instances of disaffection more blatant instead of resorting to fact-listing. Then I'd like the ending to lead to something. What does this say about Lyra's character? Or what conflict has been set up and stands to be resolved? In a nutshell, what message do you want the reader to take away from the story?

Nicely done, though. Most of these things are minor fixes, and I don't think the more abstract issues will be tough to deal with, either.Note that this list is not necessarily comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Canterlot library//</span><br />Is that the official name? Then capitalize both.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;symphonies and ballads and threnodies//</span><br />Wow, you sure went obscure quick. The only threnody I can think of is part of John Ireland&#039;s Concertino Pastorale. Most readers will have no idea what one is, though I&#039;m glad you gave ample context to give them all they really need to know about it. What I&#039;d suggest is this: 1) keep it simple and pick yet another choice that most people have at least heard of, then give the list a sequence from grand to intimate or most to least familiar; or 2) pick a few more terms of varied obscurity and string them out, again in order, to lead the reader there. I will caution you, though, make sure the character is one who&#039;d have an advanced enough knowledge of music to use these terms. I haven&#039;t read far enough in to see yet.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;leather-bound//</span><br />As in the tanned hides of dead sentient cows?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But in my gut, it exists, or did at one point.//</span><br />I think you could stand to ground this better in what fascinates her about it. All I get is a vague description of the drawing, and she didn&#039;t seem so drawn to it. She says she is, but I don&#039;t have the evidence of that. An example speaks far louder than a generality.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There’s a discordant thrum of several strings not meant to be played together//</span><br />Musically speaking, there&#039;s no such thing, so this would have to be grounded in her own musical preferences, yet I have no idea what those are. Depending on the state of their music, this could be three consecutive notes together, a tri-tone, something not in a pentatonic scale, etc.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the ripped cushions propel my body towards the front door//</span><br />This just sounds weird. How do the cushions propel her?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Without even thinking, a thick winter jacket and a golden scarf wrap themselves around me.//</span><br />This says that the jacket and coat weren&#039;t thinking. While accurate, it&#039;s not exactly surprising or informative.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My horn glimmers and the door to my cabin opens.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Slamming the door shut, I trot out into the dense snow.//</span><br />Note that participles mean simultaneous action, so the slams the door at the same time she&#039;s trotting into the snow, while it&#039;s more likely they happen in sequence.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It would be entirely unlike her to frighten others on purpose.//</span><br />This isn&#039;t bad, but there are a lot of instances where you have &quot;to be&quot; verbs that you could easily remove by rephrasing. &quot;I&#039;d never known her to do something like this,&quot; as a simple example. You do have a fair number of boring &quot;to be&quot; verbs, and you could stand to use more active language to keep things moving.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I have to look down again//</span><br />She never looked up, unless she&#039;s been doing so since before she left the house.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I summon up the willpower to keep moving forward.//</span><br />This tripped me up a little because of what it follows. I didn&#039;t know whether she was actually doing this, or if it was continuing her comment, and she was saying this is how she normally behaves in the event of an adventure.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then I smack myself//</span><br />None of her commentary, gets to a mood of her feeling foolish, so this seems out of place.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Something was waiting for me up ahead in the frozen undergrowth.//</span><br />Why go to past tense here?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it is my civil duty//</span><br />The story reads more like she&#039;s going out there due to curiosity, not concern. It could use punching up a bit, one way or the other. Either make it so she takes this angle sooner and more consistently, if it&#039;s true, or have her sound like she&#039;s bluffing if this is just a rationalization on her part. The last line of the paragraph sells it some, but it sounds more like she&#039;s trying to overcome her trepidation than making excuses for why she should keep going.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Fire shoots out of its belly and I leap backwards//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;eyes widening of their own accord//</span><br />Using such formal language in conjunction with attributing the action to a body part, serves to externalize this and take away its sense of immediacy. If she&#039;s truly surprised, she doesn&#039;t have time to wax eloquent about it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;All of the snow has melted around it, and the ground is scarred from where it walked.//</span><br />Look how calm she sounds here. Then compare it to how she sounded at the end of the previous scene. It feels inconsistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;But something seemed off.//</span><br />Why past tense?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Inching a bit closer, it is obvious that this monster is, in fact, a monster.//</span><br />Dangling participle. &quot;Inching a bit closer&quot; should describe her, but she never appears. It describes what ever abstract concept &quot;it&quot; refers to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Not something I’d like to be close to, if at all possible.//</span><br />I gather that maybe she sounds less afraid in this scene because she&#039;s drawn to whatever this is? Let that come through. Make her narration sound like she feels this compelling tug to go forward.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;ship//</span><br />How does she decide that&#039;s what it is? There&#039;s nothing in the description to make me think that&#039;s what it is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My hoof stops a half-inch above where I thought the surface to be, and I realize it’s a button.//</span><br />Rephrase slightly. &quot;It&quot; has no antecedent here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;behemoth//</span><br />You already used that word, and not long ago. It&#039;s unusual enough that it sticks out like a sore thumb.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Hooking my limbs around the lip of the newly opened portal, I manage to pull myself up onto the slick steel.//</span><br />Another case where the participle tends to synchronize things that probably shouldn&#039;t be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; Lowering myself over the edge and into the container itself, two doorways make themselves apparent.//</span><br />Another dangling participle. It says that the doorways lowered her into the container. You&#039;re using quite a few participial phrases lately, too.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;dimly lit//</span><br />Kind of an oxymoronic phrase that&#039;s seen as cliched.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There’s nothing to be afraid of here.//</span><br />But she doesn&#039;t sound afraid. She sounds almost… monotone? Which might actually be effective here, if she&#039;s in a trance-like state, though it could stand to be a little more obvious.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Thump.//</span><br />Eh. It&#039;s frowned upon to put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They don’t budge from their spots, no matter how hard I pull them.//</span><br />Basically I think you need to decide how she should sound and why. Is she distant and entranced? Or is she curious and excited? As it is, the narration&#039;s kind of bland, which works for the former, except it&#039;s not obvious or consistently so.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;There are a series of clicks//</span><br />Number disagreement. &quot;Series&quot; is singular here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Racing back, I pull the ponies towards the entrance to the machine.//</span><br />Synchronization again.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Various pieces of something hit the outside of the ship and smoke fills the interior.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m choking. I have to save these ponies.//</span><br />Again, without an atmosphere that she has dulled thoughts and a compulsion to act, these just come across as emotionless. An exclamation mark, some more emphatic phrasing… well, starting with the next sentence, there you go. This sets the mood much better.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I run as quickly as I can.//</span><br />She doesn&#039;t mention the weight of them. Isn&#039;t she having some difficulty pulling them along?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The inside of my eyelids are red.//</span><br />Number disagreement: inside -&gt; are.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The covers fly off me and I step onto the floor.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Stamping my hooves against the well-worn doormat, I rummage through the cabinets until I spy a square of silk mesh.//</span><br />Synchronization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Neither of them say anything.//</span><br />&quot;Neither&quot; takes the number of the items it refers to, and they&#039;re both singular, so &quot;says.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;these creatures//</span><br />The previous night, she was convinced that were ponies. What made her change her mind?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I need to control my stuttering.//</span><br />But she didn&#039;t stutter, nor is there any evidence that she&#039;s prone to.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It touches my head lightly runs the appendages through my mane//</span><br />Missing comma or word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The first barks loudly and its shoulders shake up and down.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Are they talking about me? Something about them feels familiar…//</span><br />Maybe could use a slight rephrasing to avoid the repetition of &quot;about.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I prance in place when I hear light steps from inside pitter-pattering their way over to the entrance.//</span><br />See, her actions get across her mood, but not the manner in which they&#039;re presented. Let the tone of the narration carry it as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My magic engulfs it and I pull the book towards me, scanning the cover.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Nothing in the way of a title; only a picture of a pony’s head, mouth wide open, the edges pulled upward in a jubilant smile.//</span><br />A semicolon really does call for a formalism of structure, but there aren&#039;t any independent clauses here.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He bats his eyelids and I ruffle his spines.//</span><br />Needs a comma. It also seems odd that she knows him well enough to do that. It&#039;s not supported in canon or built up in the story.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Oh, imagine if knowledge about the two creatures on my sofa was made public!//</span><br />For hypothetical statements, use subjunctive mood: if knowledge… were made public.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I pull the winter garments off//</span><br />I&#039;d use &quot;my&quot; garments. This sounds a bit off.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A shade of brilliant blue lies above me and I barely notice it.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A soft breeze plays over my back and I hum to myself as I compose the first movement of the spell.//</span><br />Needs a comma. This actually has me intrigued, but I think it could stand to be a little more concrete. Is she referring to it as a movement because she just thinks of it that way, or does she actually incorporate music into her spellcasting?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The field fades and I’m back in my rustic cabin, mere inches from the book.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The creatures are upside-down and they stare at me without saying anything.//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The creature shrieks a name I can’t pronounce and I leap backwards//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The second one sheds its helmet and I’m surprised at how similar the humans look.//</span><br />Needs a comma, and why is she still using &quot;it&quot; when they&#039;ve already been identified as male?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;with excitement//</span><br />These prepositional phrases of emotional exposition are rarely necessary and almost always redundant with information that&#039;s already presented.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We left it ages ago, I didn’t think there’d be a trace left of the old thing!//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;That wasn’t a ship//</span><br />Then why&#039;d she call it one? (iirc, I pointed that out in an earlier comment.)<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;a few question//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“fingers” on their “hands”//</span><br />Now, this always bugs me when humans turn up. They really don&#039;t have any analog for this? Not Spike&#039;s claws or Tirek&#039;s hands? Discord&#039;s paw? Iron Will&#039;s hands?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Supplies will be gathered tomorrow//</span><br />Needs a comma after this, but I don&#039;t see the advantage of passive voice here. It just sounds odd. And supplies for what?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;onboard//</span><br />on board<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I feel like a filly again, listening to my parents argue; always frightening, never fruitful.//</span><br />Misused semicolon.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;We’ll take over and then the planet will go to pieces for a second time!”//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The desperation in his voice is palpable and it echoes across the wooden floor.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I turn over, feigning sleep, and watch as he turns//</span><br />Watch the repetition of &quot;turn.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;bangs as the globe falls out of the second brother’s grasp and clatters//</span><br />I&#039;m not sure if either of those sounds works well for a large wooden object.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I can’t bring myself to meet his eyes so I stare at the body in front of me.//</span><br />Needs a comma.<br /><br />Okay, that ending. I don&#039;t mind it at all for what happens. I do think it suffers from a lack of implication, though. I&#039;m not sure what Lyra intends to do about any of this. Hide the body in her house? Sneak it out and bury it somewhere? And why can&#039;t she trust Twilight? She never says. I certainly think Twilight would handle it well, though you could write Lyra such that <i>she</i> doesn&#039;t think so.<br /><br />And it needs a little more as to why Lyra says she can&#039;t trust this human and what that entails. He acted in Equestria&#039;s interest, and based on his argument, it&#039;s reasonable to think he&#039;d continue to, though he&#039;d also have a loyalty to his brother, and he turned against him.<br /><br />So will she try to track this human down in the woods and kill him? Does she think he&#039;s dangerous enough to make that necessary? And if she truly doesn&#039;t trust any other ponies with the knowledge, she&#039;d have to do it herself.<br /><br />Basically, it isn&#039;t leading anywhere, or if the idea is to leave it open-ended, it&#039;s not attaching much emotional investment to the various options. As is kind of symptomatic of a lot of the story, Lyra&#039;s reaction is pretty bland. She&#039;s witnessed a murder (how unheard of in Equestrian society is this anyway?) and doesn&#039;t do anything, but she still seems to be thinking clearly.<br /><br />The big thing I&#039;d like to see here is more emotional consistency in the narration, or if you&#039;re setting off times she gets distant for some reason, make that come through as well. Usually, something like getting distracted or zoning out would connote getting mesmerized like that, but I don&#039;t get the feel that&#039;s what you were going for. So either give me more emotional cues, particularly in how the narration is worded and presented, or make those instances of disaffection more blatant instead of resorting to fact-listing. Then I&#039;d like the ending to lead to something. What does this say about Lyra&#039;s character? Or what conflict has been set up and stands to be resolved? In a nutshell, what message do you want the reader to take away from the story?<br /><br />Nicely done, though. Most of these things are minor fixes, and I don&#039;t think the more abstract issues will be tough to deal with, either.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 364

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

A few writing tics stand out. You lean on "as" clauses a lot, to the point they become repetitive. Every sentence in your second paragraph has one. There are seven in the first screenful, plus another "as" used for a comparative phrase. So I did a Ctrl-f for " as " and found 40. That's about one every 190 words, or 2-3 per page. That's actually not too bad, but when I look at where the instances occur, there's a cluster of them right here at the beginning and another about 30% of the way through. At the beginning, I'm also seeing a lot of "to be" verbs. It's impractical to excise them from a story altogether, but you should choose active verbs where possible, especially here, where you're trying to hook the reader. These verbs are not very engaging—it's more interesting to read about what happens, not what is—so it only helps to limit them here. Likewise, I've searched the story for the easier forms to find, and I get 227, which is nearly one every other sentence. There are 121 instances of "was" alone. That's how often something doesn't happen.

As long as I'm doing searches, here are other words that authors often overuse:
just: 52, getting up there, but not awful
turn: 13, good
walk/trot: 4, good
look: 42, fairly high, and they get clustered in places

Next, I notice that you're using a limited narrator. Kind of a shallow one, but limited nonetheless. So on the one hand, it's odd to see the occasional musing italicized as a direct thought, when we already have access to her thoughts through the narrator. There are times this can work, namely when it's important the reader know the though occurred verbatim or you want to phrase it as a first-person thought, but neither really applies here. On the other hand, we occasionally get statements like this:
>She sighed again and wished it was tea time.//
It's not necessary for a limited narrator to tell us that a character thought or wished or wanted something, because the narration can do that and communicate it with more emotion. Take this for example: "Could tea time come any slower?" That communicates the same thing, but it forges a closer link with the reader, since it brings him into her viewpoint instead of stating it as a dry fact, and it indirectly makes it her wish instead of bluntly identifying it as one.

Likewise, it feels odd when you use "her father," since that creates a sense of being external to her, particularly when she just uses "Father" most of the time.

>smaller…scared, even.. //

You'll normally leave a space after an ellipsis, and I'm not sure whether that second one has one too many or one too few periods.

>Ponies paused in their morning routine//

"Routine" would be plural here, unless it's always the same ponies every day in exactly the same way, so that there is an overarching routine involving every individual.

>Ponyville was her home now and she had a reputation to build.//

I've noticed several instances of this by now, where you need a comma to set off a dependent clause.

>Everypony would be watching. Everypony.//

That second "everypony" feels like it could use emphasis.

>deep breath that traveled from deep//

Watch the close repetition of all but the most mundane of words.

>The magenta filly behind them looked a little impressed.//

I haven't caught you being telly, so one fleeting instance isn't going to kill you, but this is an important moment for her, and I think showing me the filly's reaction instead of just telling me she's impressed would be more engaging.

>upperclassmare’s//

As used, you need that to be plural.

>3.9//

We prefer number that short spelled out: three-point-nine.

>said wrap it up//

If you're going to present it as a quote, then punctuate/capitalize it like one. Otherwise, add a "to" in there and get rid of the italics.

>It didn’t matter now, she’d run out of time.//

Comma splice.

>four seats to choose from//

She did that math awfully fast, and if she figures out someone's not there, wouldn't she ask to make sure not to take that student's seat?

>Welcome to our clath Thilver Thpoon!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>The desk next to it was empty.//

This gets to the point I just made a bit ago. It sounds like she knows that one of the empty seats is off limits and which one, but how does she know?

>worse came to worse//

Worst came to worst

>She always seemed to have the same keen tone of voice//

Kind of a premature conclusion, given that she's only heard Cheerilee speak a couple times so far.

>Which aren’t always hot, they can be cold, too.//

Comma splice.

>The tatty pegasus was glaring at her. Another pony frowned.//

Whenever you lapse into one of these descriptions of her classmates' actions around her, the sentence structures get really repetitive. Having it be that way once is fine, but when it keeps happening, it gets in a rut. They're all short, simple sentences starting with the subject.

>The blue one jumped a bed of posies, swerving to miss the fillies playing hopscotch.//

This is a common issue with participial phrases. They imply simultaneous action, so you have him swerving at the same time he's jumping. While possible, if he has any command of his magic yet, it's unlikely.

>zig-zagged, double-backed//

zigzagged, doubled back

>The grass was still wet from last night’s rainstorm.//

It feels like a plot convenience that this is just now mentioned. Bring it up much earlier if you can, maybe even in the previous scene. Or maybe show it raining as she's first arriving in town. Then this is a reminder and not a just-in-time fact.

>A jolt of revulsion rippled through her pristine coat.//

Be more descriptive than telly here. What does she actually do? Shudder, wince? What physical symptoms does she feel from it?

>“tsk”.//

Period goes inside the quotes.

>Guffaws//

I can't tell whether you mean he's laughing or that's his name.

>She flicked her tail, irritated.//

That goes by so quickly as to have little impact. Give me some more detail, and preferably more internal than this somewhat omniscient statement.

>her classmate’s shrieking laughter//

Just one, or did you mean that to be plural?

>The filly did not think about Manehattan and did not frown.//

Given the limited narrator, you're essentially saying she's thinking about herself as "the filly," which is weird.

>He’s an appraiser for Canterlot Museum of Art and Antiquities.//

Missing a "the."

>what?//

Normally, an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word is also italicized.

>once…it’s//

It looks to me like you leave a space after an ellipsis only if it ends the sentence. It's more standard to leave a space after one in all cases except leading ellipses, but it's not something worth quibbling over if you attach some differentiation to the practice.

>It’s just…tag.//

Well, now it just looks like you're being inconsistent.

>Silver’s lost expression//

Narrative voicing. It's odd for Silver to make this judgment about herself. It sounds more like Sweetie's opinion.

>She flipped her braid over her shoulder//

How many does she have? You referred to multiple ones earlier. In fact, do a Ctrl-F for "braid" This is the third instance of it. In the prior one, she does almost the same word-for-word thing.

>“game”.//

Period inside the quotes.

>boys versus girls//

You're using that as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>Don’t bother with the porcelain cup, it’s not dirty.//

Comma splice.

>The filly looked up at him.//

That reference again. You shouldn't be mentioning her in such an external way when you have a limited narrator in her perspective.

>I don’t think they like me, Tacks.//

I catch authors doing this from time to time. She calls him by name several times in this conversation. It can be a sign of emphasis, but I don't see it here. Think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation. You're also missing a line break for the new paragraph after this.

>and declined to mention that two of those three fillies lived in the same building and their parents had grasped for the Silvers’ good favor for years//

Wait, why are you hopping over to his perspective for the grand total of one paragraph? If it's really necessary to jump to him (and it probably isn't), it's worth staying there a while.

>6:45//

Minor thing, but we usually prefer that to be written out.

>Her ear pricked at approaching hoofsteps and turned.//

This makes it sound like only her ear turned, but apparently her whole body does, since she goes on to describe what was previously behind her.

>Are you feeling better today?//

Wait, did I miss something? I don't recall Silver feeling sick or missing school. Maybe her leaving early on Friday implied that she did or at least faked it? If so, that could be made clearer.

>she was ready to fight you for it.//

I'd get rid of the "you," since the sentence makes sense without it, and addressing the reader opens a can of worms.

>‘New money runs, old money walks’,//

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>My daddy owns Barnyard Bargains.//

Only because I recognize this from canon do I know who's speaking here. The pronouns are getting ambiguous, and at first, I thought Diamond was the one saying her mother taught voice lessons.

Okay, I like what I see here. The biggest issues were the ones I raised right up front, with the repetitive elements and narrative voicing, and while they're not hard to fix, they can be a little time-consuming.

I would make one more request, though: The spot for the incomplete story synopsis in the submission form is intended for you to give a quick summary of where the rest of the story goes. We don't want to get caught with any unpleasant surprises, we like to know that the author has a plan, and at times, and we can try and shoot down problems before they happen when some red flags pop up with it. So I'd still want to see one of those.

This story shows a lot of promise, though, and I'd like to see it come back fixed up so I can post it.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br />A few writing tics stand out. You lean on &quot;as&quot; clauses a lot, to the point they become repetitive. Every sentence in your second paragraph has one. There are seven in the first screenful, plus another &quot;as&quot; used for a comparative phrase. So I did a Ctrl-f for &quot; as &quot; and found 40. That&#039;s about one every 190 words, or 2-3 per page. That&#039;s actually not too bad, but when I look at where the instances occur, there&#039;s a cluster of them right here at the beginning and another about 30% of the way through. At the beginning, I&#039;m also seeing a lot of &quot;to be&quot; verbs. It&#039;s impractical to excise them from a story altogether, but you should choose active verbs where possible, especially here, where you&#039;re trying to hook the reader. These verbs are not very engaging—it&#039;s more interesting to read about what happens, not what is—so it only helps to limit them here. Likewise, I&#039;ve searched the story for the easier forms to find, and I get 227, which is nearly one every other sentence. There are 121 instances of &quot;was&quot; alone. That&#039;s how often something doesn&#039;t happen.<br /><br />As long as I&#039;m doing searches, here are other words that authors often overuse:<br />just: 52, getting up there, but not awful<br />turn: 13, good<br />walk/trot: 4, good<br />look: 42, fairly high, and they get clustered in places<br /><br />Next, I notice that you&#039;re using a limited narrator. Kind of a shallow one, but limited nonetheless. So on the one hand, it&#039;s odd to see the occasional musing italicized as a direct thought, when we already have access to her thoughts through the narrator. There are times this can work, namely when it&#039;s important the reader know the though occurred verbatim or you want to phrase it as a first-person thought, but neither really applies here. On the other hand, we occasionally get statements like this:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She sighed again and wished it was tea time.//</span><br />It&#039;s not necessary for a limited narrator to tell us that a character thought or wished or wanted something, because the narration can do that and communicate it with more emotion. Take this for example: &quot;Could tea time come any slower?&quot; That communicates the same thing, but it forges a closer link with the reader, since it brings him into her viewpoint instead of stating it as a dry fact, and it indirectly makes it her wish instead of bluntly identifying it as one.<br /><br />Likewise, it feels odd when you use &quot;her father,&quot; since that creates a sense of being external to her, particularly when she just uses &quot;Father&quot; most of the time.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;smaller…scared, even.. //</span><br />You&#039;ll normally leave a space after an ellipsis, and I&#039;m not sure whether that second one has one too many or one too few periods.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponies paused in their morning routine//</span><br />&quot;Routine&quot; would be plural here, unless it&#039;s always the same ponies every day in exactly the same way, so that there is an overarching routine involving every individual.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ponyville was her home now and she had a reputation to build.//</span><br />I&#039;ve noticed several instances of this by now, where you need a comma to set off a dependent clause.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Everypony would be watching. Everypony.//</span><br />That second &quot;everypony&quot; feels like it could use emphasis.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;deep breath that traveled from deep//</span><br />Watch the close repetition of all but the most mundane of words.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The magenta filly behind them looked a little impressed.//</span><br />I haven&#039;t caught you being telly, so one fleeting instance isn&#039;t going to kill you, but this is an important moment for her, and I think showing me the filly&#039;s reaction instead of just telling me she&#039;s impressed would be more engaging.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;upperclassmare’s//</span><br />As used, you need that to be plural.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;3.9//</span><br />We prefer number that short spelled out: three-point-nine.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;said <i>wrap it up</i>//</span><br />If you&#039;re going to present it as a quote, then punctuate/capitalize it like one. Otherwise, add a &quot;to&quot; in there and get rid of the italics.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It didn’t matter now, she’d run out of time.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;four seats to choose from//</span><br />She did that math awfully fast, and if she figures out someone&#039;s not there, wouldn&#039;t she ask to make sure not to take that student&#039;s seat?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Welcome to our clath Thilver Thpoon!//</span><br />Needs a comma for direct address.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The desk next to it was empty.//</span><br />This gets to the point I just made a bit ago. It sounds like she knows that one of the empty seats is off limits and which one, but how does she know?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;worse came to worse//</span><br />Worst came to worst<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She always seemed to have the same keen tone of voice//</span><br />Kind of a premature conclusion, given that she&#039;s only heard Cheerilee speak a couple times so far.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Which aren’t always hot, they can be cold, too.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The tatty pegasus was glaring at her. Another pony frowned.//</span><br />Whenever you lapse into one of these descriptions of her classmates&#039; actions around her, the sentence structures get really repetitive. Having it be that way once is fine, but when it keeps happening, it gets in a rut. They&#039;re all short, simple sentences starting with the subject.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The blue one jumped a bed of posies, swerving to miss the fillies playing hopscotch.//</span><br />This is a common issue with participial phrases. They imply simultaneous action, so you have him swerving at the same time he&#039;s jumping. While possible, if he has any command of his magic yet, it&#039;s unlikely.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;zig-zagged, double-backed//</span><br />zigzagged, doubled back<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The grass was still wet from last night’s rainstorm.//</span><br />It feels like a plot convenience that this is just now mentioned. Bring it up much earlier if you can, maybe even in the previous scene. Or maybe show it raining as she&#039;s first arriving in town. Then this is a reminder and not a just-in-time fact.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;A jolt of revulsion rippled through her pristine coat.//</span><br />Be more descriptive than telly here. What does she actually do? Shudder, wince? What physical symptoms does she feel from it?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“tsk”.//</span><br />Period goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Guffaws//</span><br />I can&#039;t tell whether you mean he&#039;s laughing or that&#039;s his name.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She flicked her tail, irritated.//</span><br />That goes by so quickly as to have little impact. Give me some more detail, and preferably more internal than this somewhat omniscient statement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her classmate’s shrieking laughter//</span><br />Just one, or did you mean that to be plural?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The filly did not think about Manehattan and did not frown.//</span><br />Given the limited narrator, you&#039;re essentially saying she&#039;s thinking about herself as &quot;the filly,&quot; which is weird.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He’s an appraiser for Canterlot Museum of Art and Antiquities.//</span><br />Missing a &quot;the.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>what</i>?//</span><br />Normally, an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word is also italicized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;once…it’s//</span><br />It looks to me like you leave a space after an ellipsis only if it ends the sentence. It&#039;s more standard to leave a space after one in all cases except leading ellipses, but it&#039;s not something worth quibbling over if you attach some differentiation to the practice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It’s just…tag.//</span><br />Well, now it just looks like you&#039;re being inconsistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Silver’s lost expression//</span><br />Narrative voicing. It&#039;s odd for Silver to make this judgment about herself. It sounds more like Sweetie&#039;s opinion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She flipped her braid over her shoulder//</span><br />How many does she have? You referred to multiple ones earlier. In fact, do a Ctrl-F for &quot;braid&quot; This is the third instance of it. In the prior one, she does almost the same word-for-word thing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“game”.//</span><br />Period inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;boys versus girls//</span><br />You&#039;re using that as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Don’t bother with the porcelain cup, it’s not dirty.//</span><br />Comma splice.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The filly looked up at him.//</span><br />That reference again. You shouldn&#039;t be mentioning her in such an external way when you have a limited narrator in her perspective.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I don’t think they like me, Tacks.//</span><br />I catch authors doing this from time to time. She calls him by name several times in this conversation. It can be a sign of emphasis, but I don&#039;t see it here. Think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation. You&#039;re also missing a line break for the new paragraph after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and declined to mention that two of those three fillies lived in the same building and their parents had grasped for the Silvers’ good favor for years//</span><br />Wait, why are you hopping over to his perspective for the grand total of one paragraph? If it&#039;s really necessary to jump to him (and it probably isn&#039;t), it&#039;s worth staying there a while.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;6:45//</span><br />Minor thing, but we usually prefer that to be written out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Her ear pricked at approaching hoofsteps and turned.//</span><br />This makes it sound like only her ear turned, but apparently her whole body does, since she goes on to describe what was previously behind her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Are you feeling better today?//</span><br />Wait, did I miss something? I don&#039;t recall Silver feeling sick or missing school. Maybe her leaving early on Friday implied that she did or at least faked it? If so, that could be made clearer.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she was ready to fight you for it.//</span><br />I&#039;d get rid of the &quot;you,&quot; since the sentence makes sense without it, and addressing the reader opens a can of worms.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘New money runs, old money walks’,//</span><br />Comma goes inside the quotes.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;My daddy owns Barnyard Bargains.//</span><br />Only because I recognize this from canon do I know who&#039;s speaking here. The pronouns are getting ambiguous, and at first, I thought Diamond was the one saying her mother taught voice lessons.<br /><br />Okay, I like what I see here. The biggest issues were the ones I raised right up front, with the repetitive elements and narrative voicing, and while they&#039;re not hard to fix, they can be a little time-consuming.<br /><br />I would make one more request, though: The spot for the incomplete story synopsis in the submission form is intended for you to give a quick summary of where the rest of the story goes. We don&#039;t want to get caught with any unpleasant surprises, we like to know that the author has a plan, and at times, and we can try and shoot down problems before they happen when some red flags pop up with it. So I&#039;d still want to see one of those.<br /><br />This story shows a lot of promise, though, and I&#039;d like to see it come back fixed up so I can post it.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 365

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Ebony hooves echoed off the marble floor as a young white Pegasus fled along yet another corridor, moonlight streaming through the stained glass windows. Her pursuers kept pace, their constant orders for her to halt still within earshot.//

Let's start with the first paragraph, appropriately. Both sentences have an absolute phrase on the end, which immediately creates a repetitive structure. Also note that the "moonlight streaming" gives a still and peaceful scene that feels out of place with the action going on around it. Also notice how you repeat "halt" very soon after in the next paragraph.

>heir horns shined brightly//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense, like what you do to shoes or brass. You want "shone."

>The mare stiffened, then simply smirked. “Now, that won’t do at all, I’m afraid. You see—”

>
>Her form ignited with a burst of emerald flame, shattering the shield.
>
>“—I already have a date with royalty.”//
You don't need to put those in separate paragraphs. Here's how to put a narrative aside in a quote (note the pattern of capitalization and punctuation):
The mare stiffened, then simply smirked. “Now, that won’t do at all, I’m afraid. You see—” her form ignited with a burst of emerald flame, shattering the shield “—I already have a date with royalty.”

>The stallion hung his head, his ears flat against his head.//

Watch the repetition.

>The stallion saluted and departed, leaving Celestia alone in the room. She sighed, dropping her royal facade as she wandered from her throne to a window. The moon caught her attention, shining gently as ever like nothing of concern had even happened.//

You have a participial phrase in every sentence here. That structural repetition gets into a rut. There are attendant problems with participle use that you'll probably run into just by using so many. It's probably worth scanning through your story for them to make sure you're not using a whole lot overall or locally in clumps like this.

One issue is that they can be misplaced modifiers. Take your last one here. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so "shining gently" would tend to modify "attention." Now, we can apply a little logic and figure out what you meant, but if there'd been another potentially shiny object there in the sentence, it could be ambiguous or misleading.

I'm not going to point out any more participles unless they are one of the other problematic types I alluded to. Other than that, just suffice it to say you could stand to reduce the number of them overall and even out their distribution. While they're nice for flavor, authors who are just starting to gain some experience often rely on them too much, to the point that they get overloaded with them.

Likewise, if you add in the last sentence of this paragraph, there are two "as" clauses, which are similarly overused by many authors.

>Even after fleeing Canterlot, the Changeling’s wings buzzed like her life depended on it.//

Speak of the devil. Here's another problem participles can cause if you aren't careful. It's a special case of a misplaced modifier calling a dangling participle. "Even after fleeing Canterlot" is supposed to describe Chrysalis, but she doesn't appear in the clause. It describes her wings, and while they've technically fled Canterlot as well, it's just weird to say it that way, and I'm sure it's not what you intended anyway.

>Sync stared back at him, affronted//

Okay, you've been good about show versus tell so far, so I've let a few inconsequential ones go, but this is a pretty big emotional point of the story, so I'd rather have you make her look and act affronted than just tell me she is.

>She shuddered as she recalled the withered old stallion that kept the library in order.//

You've kept to Sync's perspective since the scene began. Why skip over to her now? Is it really necessary? Just having her shudder still gets the mood across, and since that's something Sync can see, the perspective would still rest with him. There can be good reasons to shift perspective, but it has to be carefully considered.

>At first elated//

You were doing so well before, but another blatant telly spot where it really doesn't work.

>remaining energy I have left//

Redundant.

>making Sync even more indignant towards her two friends//

Stahp. And while you're stahping, have a look at the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. It gives some more detail about what warning signs to look for.

>changelings//

You'd been capitalizing that. Be consistent.

>the chariot he was in//

That's a clunky phrasing.

>hiding?//

You'll normally italicize a question mark or exclamation mark that's on an italicized word.

>‘ling//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can type two and erase the first, or you can paste one in from somewhere else.

>Spurred on by the gesture, Chrysalis let out a shout as the light consumed everything…//

This is the fourth sentence with an "as" clause in just the last two paragraphs (not counting the short thought one).

>his horn shined brightly//

"Shone" again, but notice that it's the exact phrasing you used from the last time I pointed this out.

>the stones he stood next to//

Another awkward phrasing. How is this any better than "the stones next to him"?

>They split into a two-by-two formation, cautiously entering the tunnel.//

And there's the trifecta of participles. They imply simultaneous action, so you have them entering the tunnel at the same time they split into formations, while it's more reasonable for them to do those actions one after the other.

>changeling//

You should just Ctrl-f for these and make sure you use consistent capitalization.

>rubbed the bridge of his nose//

I get that authors want to use human mannerisms, but horses don't even have such a thing, and if pones did, it'd be way down on their muzzles, not between their eyes. If the latter's what you want, then just say that.

>An empty wasteland of nothing that seemed to stretch forever and it was all her fault.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, and based on the way you're formatting this, it needs a line break as well.

>just, save them//

Commas aren't for dramatic pauses. There's no grammatical reason to have one there.

>“… ake… up…”//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis. And note that some of your ellipses are a single character while others are three separate dots. Just do a search and replace of one for the other so they're all the same.

>Chrysalis’//

I realize that it's become acceptable to use this form now, while the traditional one would be "Chrysalis’s." But you used this version earlier in the story, so be consistent.

>cosy cave//

Extraneous space.

>He just hoped his shell would remain in one piece.//

Why are you hopping over to his perspective?

>She withdrew at the sight of her quivering charge, and sighed.//

That's all one clause. No need for the comma.

>Though it was just a pile of moss, it was strangely comfortable.//

Here, you're in Chrysalis's perspective, and…
>He quickly glanced around to see if anyling was nearby before leaning closer.//
here, you're in Scribe's. Then back to Chrysalis:
>Chrysalis sighed as she closed her eyes; her eyelids felt so very heavy.//
It's not necessary to be hopping around like this.

> the youngling tumbled through the air, landing on the soft grass and rolling, finally stopping at the biped’s feet as dislodged leaves floated down around her.//

Another case of participles synchronizing actions that shouldn't be.

>her eyes shining and her legs covering her head//

How does her know it's a female? Even Sync didn't seem to know, as she used "their" instead of "her" earlier.

>Scratching his head, Adrien reached again for his belt.//

More synchronization problems.

>she let out an audible sigh of relief//

Since you're using a limited narrator, there's no need to be so blunt about this.

>they hurried along the passage, to discover the rest of the hive either cringing and backing away, or running around yelping//

Neither of those commas is needed.

>M-m-majesssty//

Since the word has to be capitalized anyway, do so in every instance of the first letter.

>T-that’s//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Certainly not just the "t."

>changeish//

A language would be capitalized.

>looking perplexed//

Show me what that looks like.

I like what I see here. Really, there's not that much to fix up, so I don't think it should be hard. I suspect that has as much to do with your editor as much as anything else. Whatever it takes, if you can keep that quality up for the rest of the story, I think it could have a home on the blog. When you're ready to resubmit, please choose the "back from Mars" option.
Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Ebony hooves echoed off the marble floor as a young white Pegasus fled along yet another corridor, moonlight streaming through the stained glass windows. Her pursuers kept pace, their constant orders for her to halt still within earshot.//</span><br />Let&#039;s start with the first paragraph, appropriately. Both sentences have an absolute phrase on the end, which immediately creates a repetitive structure. Also note that the &quot;moonlight streaming&quot; gives a still and peaceful scene that feels out of place with the action going on around it. Also notice how you repeat &quot;halt&quot; very soon after in the next paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;heir horns shined brightly//</span><br />&quot;Shined&quot; is the transitive past tense, like what you do to shoes or brass. You want &quot;shone.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The mare stiffened, then simply smirked. “Now, that won’t do at all, I’m afraid. You see—”</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;Her form ignited with a burst of emerald flame, shattering the shield.</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<br />&gt;“—I already have a date with royalty.”//</span><br />You don&#039;t need to put those in separate paragraphs. Here&#039;s how to put a narrative aside in a quote (note the pattern of capitalization and punctuation):<br />The mare stiffened, then simply smirked. “Now, that won’t do at all, I’m afraid. You see—” her form ignited with a burst of emerald flame, shattering the shield “—I already have a date with royalty.”<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stallion hung his head, his ears flat against his head.//</span><br />Watch the repetition.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;The stallion saluted and departed, leaving Celestia alone in the room. She sighed, dropping her royal facade as she wandered from her throne to a window. The moon caught her attention, shining gently as ever like nothing of concern had even happened.//</span><br />You have a participial phrase in every sentence here. That structural repetition gets into a rut. There are attendant problems with participle use that you&#039;ll probably run into just by using so many. It&#039;s probably worth scanning through your story for them to make sure you&#039;re not using a whole lot overall or locally in clumps like this.<br /><br />One issue is that they can be misplaced modifiers. Take your last one here. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so &quot;shining gently&quot; would tend to modify &quot;attention.&quot; Now, we can apply a little logic and figure out what you meant, but if there&#039;d been another potentially shiny object there in the sentence, it could be ambiguous or misleading.<br /><br />I&#039;m not going to point out any more participles unless they are one of the other problematic types I alluded to. Other than that, just suffice it to say you could stand to reduce the number of them overall and even out their distribution. While they&#039;re nice for flavor, authors who are just starting to gain some experience often rely on them too much, to the point that they get overloaded with them.<br /><br />Likewise, if you add in the last sentence of this paragraph, there are two &quot;as&quot; clauses, which are similarly overused by many authors.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Even after fleeing Canterlot, the Changeling’s wings buzzed like her life depended on it.//</span><br />Speak of the devil. Here&#039;s another problem participles can cause if you aren&#039;t careful. It&#039;s a special case of a misplaced modifier calling a dangling participle. &quot;Even after fleeing Canterlot&quot; is supposed to describe Chrysalis, but she doesn&#039;t appear in the clause. It describes her wings, and while they&#039;ve technically fled Canterlot as well, it&#039;s just weird to say it that way, and I&#039;m sure it&#039;s not what you intended anyway.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Sync stared back at him, affronted//</span><br />Okay, you&#039;ve been good about show versus tell so far, so I&#039;ve let a few inconsequential ones go, but this is a pretty big emotional point of the story, so I&#039;d rather have you make her look and act affronted than just tell me she is.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She shuddered as she recalled the withered old stallion that kept the library in order.//</span><br />You&#039;ve kept to Sync&#039;s perspective since the scene began. Why skip over to her now? Is it really necessary? Just having her shudder still gets the mood across, and since that&#039;s something Sync can see, the perspective would still rest with him. There can be good reasons to shift perspective, but it has to be carefully considered.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At first elated//</span><br />You were doing so well before, but another blatant telly spot where it really doesn&#039;t work.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;remaining energy I have left//</span><br />Redundant.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;making Sync even more indignant towards her two friends//</span><br />Stahp. And while you&#039;re stahping, have a look at the section on &quot;show versus tell&quot; at the top of this thread. It gives some more detail about what warning signs to look for.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;changelings//</span><br />You&#039;d been capitalizing that. Be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the chariot he was in//</span><br />That&#039;s a clunky phrasing.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>hiding</i>?//</span><br />You&#039;ll normally italicize a question mark or exclamation mark that&#039;s on an italicized word.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;‘ling//</span><br />Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can type two and erase the first, or you can paste one in from somewhere else.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Spurred on by the gesture, Chrysalis let out a shout as the light consumed everything…//</span><br />This is the fourth sentence with an &quot;as&quot; clause in just the last two paragraphs (not counting the short thought one).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;his horn shined brightly//</span><br />&quot;Shone&quot; again, but notice that it&#039;s the exact phrasing you used from the last time I pointed this out.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;the stones he stood next to//</span><br />Another awkward phrasing. How is this any better than &quot;the stones next to him&quot;?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;They split into a two-by-two formation, cautiously entering the tunnel.//</span><br />And there&#039;s the trifecta of participles. They imply simultaneous action, so you have them entering the tunnel at the same time they split into formations, while it&#039;s more reasonable for them to do those actions one after the other.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;changeling//</span><br />You should just Ctrl-f for these and make sure you use consistent capitalization.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;rubbed the bridge of his nose//</span><br />I get that authors want to use human mannerisms, but horses don&#039;t even have such a thing, and if pones did, it&#039;d be way down on their muzzles, not between their eyes. If the latter&#039;s what you want, then just say that.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;An empty wasteland of nothing that seemed to stretch forever and it was all her fault.//</span><br />Needs a comma between the clauses, and based on the way you&#039;re formatting this, it needs a line break as well.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;<i>just, save them</i>//</span><br />Commas aren&#039;t for dramatic pauses. There&#039;s no grammatical reason to have one there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;“… ake… up…”//</span><br />Don&#039;t leave a space after a leading ellipsis. And note that some of your ellipses are a single character while others are three separate dots. Just do a search and replace of one for the other so they&#039;re all the same.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chrysalis’//</span><br />I realize that it&#039;s become acceptable to use this form now, while the traditional one would be &quot;Chrysalis’s.&quot; But you used this version earlier in the story, so be consistent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;cosy cave//</span><br />Extraneous space.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He just hoped his shell would remain in one piece.//</span><br />Why are you hopping over to his perspective?<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;She withdrew at the sight of her quivering charge, and sighed.//</span><br />That&#039;s all one clause. No need for the comma.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Though it was just a pile of moss, it was strangely comfortable.//</span><br />Here, you&#039;re in Chrysalis&#039;s perspective, and…<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;He quickly glanced around to see if anyling was nearby before leaning closer.//</span><br />here, you&#039;re in Scribe&#039;s. Then back to Chrysalis:<br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Chrysalis sighed as she closed her eyes; her eyelids felt <i>so</i> very heavy.//</span><br />It&#039;s not necessary to be hopping around like this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt; the youngling tumbled through the air, landing on the soft grass and rolling, finally stopping at the biped’s feet as dislodged leaves floated down around her.//</span><br />Another case of participles synchronizing actions that shouldn&#039;t be.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;her eyes shining and her legs covering her head//</span><br />How does her know it&#039;s a female? Even Sync didn&#039;t seem to know, as she used &quot;their&quot; instead of &quot;her&quot; earlier.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Scratching his head, Adrien reached again for his belt.//</span><br />More synchronization problems.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;she let out an audible sigh of relief//</span><br />Since you&#039;re using a limited narrator, there&#039;s no need to be so blunt about this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;they hurried along the passage, to discover the rest of the hive either cringing and backing away, or running around yelping//</span><br />Neither of those commas is needed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;M-m-majesssty//</span><br />Since the word has to be capitalized anyway, do so in every instance of the first letter.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;T-that’s//</span><br />Consider what sound would actually be repeated. Certainly not just the &quot;t.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;changeish//</span><br />A language would be capitalized.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;looking perplexed//</span><br />Show me what that looks like.<br /><br />I like what I see here. Really, there&#039;s not that much to fix up, so I don&#039;t think it should be hard. I suspect that has as much to do with your editor as much as anything else. Whatever it takes, if you can keep that quality up for the rest of the story, I think it could have a home on the blog. When you&#039;re ready to resubmit, please choose the &quot;back from Mars&quot; option.<br /><div class="last-edit-time"><br/>Last edited at <span class="posttime">Fri, Apr 10th, 2015 20:02</span></div><br/>

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 366

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Looking back on it I guess that was the point, ponies that naturally embodied the Elements without trying; all those years studying and training and I never even could have embodied an element.//

Comma after "looking back on it" to set off the participial phrase. And your first comma would work better as a colon or dash, I think.

>I knew, I knew,

Keep in mind that she's writing a journal here. How do you handwrite italics? When emphasizing something in handwriting, you'd naturally make it darker (use bold font) or underline it.

>Celestial//

Typo.

>I'm getting off topic now.//

Missing a line break her.

>Once I did//

>when they appeared//
>It makes me want to smile//
>Before I even went back to Equestria to steal the crown//
Comma after this.

>let’s add more item//

Typo.

>Those memories I have, they make those choice tantalizing//

You originally had "Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing," which I marked as having a typo, but you added "then." The typo was "those choice." You're mixing singular and plural.

While the prologue does rehash a lot of the movie plot, it also gets at Sunset's emotional motivation for a lot of what's going to happen, so if a reader skips the prologue, he's missing out on that, and what you did with that was pretty strong. Normally, I hate repetition, but you might consider touching on it again a little in chapter 1 just to bring those readers up to speed.

>after the thugs had run rampant//

Besides being an awfully formal phrasing, I'm surprised she cals them "thugs" here, since it's much later in the story before she feels like she didn't deserve this.

>, (a jog for her)//

Move that comma after the parenthetical element.

>shyed//

shied

>out of fear//

Cut this. It's tell and already apparent.

>runners high//

Missing apostrophe.

>and she was right next to me//

Extraneous space in there.

>I wasn’t sure if that was a smart idea//

>I’m thinking about asking for a tour of her farm sometime//
>If I did go back//
>At first I was stunned that someone actually cared enough to help//
>It took a moment//
>but those thoughts passed//
>I was pretty out of it//
Comma after this.

>Then she’d turn to Applejack and said//

I pointed this out last time. The verb forms need to be the same. Make it "turned."

>on it’s own//

I pointed this out last time, too. Its/it's confusion.

>we were suppose to//

And I pointed this one out last time, too. "supposed"

>half heartedly//

halfheartedly

>Dairy//

Do a search in all chapters for this spelling to make sure you've gotten them all.

>confused though//

thought

>I think I keep trying//

kept

>- she’s the element of loyalty after all -//

Use proper dashes here, not hyphens. Either em dashes with no surrounding spaces (Alt+0151) or en dashes surrounded by spaces (Alt+0150).

>then maybe they will feel better as well//

You already gave extra emphasis to "maybe" earlier in the sentence. I'd cut this one.

>It caught me off guard//

>I hadn’t been out to Applejack’s before//
Comma after this.

>it’s tail//

I pointed this out last time. Its/it's confusion. As you have it, it would expand out to "it is tail." You do the same thing again later in the paragraph.

>Better safe then sorry.//

And I pointed this out too. You confused "then" for "than."

>fifteen minute//

Needs a hyphen.

>friends and family of the Apple Family//

Another one I marked last time. Repetitive use of "family." Just say "friends and family of the Apples."

>farm fresh//

And another one I listed before. Needs a hyphen.

We had talked a bit about what you planned for the last chapter. I think that might be something pretty tricky to pull off, and since there's only one more to go anyway, I'd also like to have a go at making an editing sweep on it like I've done for the rest. So for bookkeeping purposes, I'll call this a Mars (so mark it as such when you resubmit), but really, it's closer to being in a holding pattern until you've finished the last chapter. Any idea when that might be done?Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Looking back on it I guess that was the point, ponies that naturally embodied the Elements without trying; all those years studying and training and I never even could have embodied an element.//</span><br />Comma after &quot;looking back on it&quot; to set off the participial phrase. And your first comma would work better as a colon or dash, I think.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I knew, <i>I knew</i>,</span><br />Keep in mind that she&#039;s writing a journal here. How do you handwrite italics? When emphasizing something in handwriting, you&#039;d naturally make it darker (use bold font) or underline it.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Celestial//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I&#039;m getting off topic now.//</span><br />Missing a line break her.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Once I did//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;when they appeared//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It makes me want to smile//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Before I even went back to Equestria to steal the crown//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;let’s add more item//</span><br />Typo.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Those memories I have, they make those choice tantalizing//</span><br />You originally had &quot;Those memories I have make those choice tantalizing,&quot; which I marked as having a typo, but you added &quot;then.&quot; The typo was &quot;those choice.&quot; You&#039;re mixing singular and plural.<br /><br />While the prologue does rehash a lot of the movie plot, it also gets at Sunset&#039;s emotional motivation for a lot of what&#039;s going to happen, so if a reader skips the prologue, he&#039;s missing out on that, and what you did with that was pretty strong. Normally, I hate repetition, but you might consider touching on it again a little in chapter 1 just to bring those readers up to speed.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;after the thugs had run rampant//</span><br />Besides being an awfully formal phrasing, I&#039;m surprised she cals them &quot;thugs&quot; here, since it&#039;s much later in the story before she feels like she didn&#039;t deserve this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;, (a jog for her)//</span><br />Move that comma after the parenthetical element.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;shyed//</span><br />shied<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;out of fear//</span><br />Cut this. It&#039;s tell and already apparent.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;runners high//</span><br />Missing apostrophe.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;and she was right next to me//</span><br />Extraneous space in there.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I wasn’t sure if that was a smart idea//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I’m thinking about asking for a tour of her farm sometime//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;If I did go back//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;At first I was stunned that someone actually cared enough to help//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It took a moment//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;but those thoughts passed//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I was pretty out of it//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Then she’d turn to Applejack and said//</span><br />I pointed this out last time. The verb forms need to be the same. Make it &quot;turned.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;on it’s own//</span><br />I pointed this out last time, too. Its/it&#039;s confusion.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;we were suppose to//</span><br />And I pointed <i>this</i> one out last time, too. &quot;supposed&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;half heartedly//</span><br />halfheartedly<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Dairy//</span><br />Do a search in all chapters for this spelling to make sure you&#039;ve gotten them all.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;confused though//</span><br />thought<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I think I keep trying//</span><br />kept<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;- she’s the element of loyalty after all -//</span><br />Use proper dashes here, not hyphens. Either em dashes with no surrounding spaces (Alt+0151) or en dashes surrounded by spaces (Alt+0150).<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;then maybe they will feel better as well//</span><br />You already gave extra emphasis to &quot;maybe&quot; earlier in the sentence. I&#039;d cut this one.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;It caught me off guard//</span><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;I hadn’t been out to Applejack’s before//</span><br />Comma after this.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;it’s tail//</span><br />I pointed this out last time. Its/it&#039;s confusion. As you have it, it would expand out to &quot;it is tail.&quot; You do the same thing again later in the paragraph.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;Better safe then sorry.//</span><br />And I pointed this out too. You confused &quot;then&quot; for &quot;than.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;fifteen minute//</span><br />Needs a hyphen.<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;friends and family of the Apple Family//</span><br />Another one I marked last time. Repetitive use of &quot;family.&quot; Just say &quot;friends and family of the Apples.&quot;<br /><br /><span class="unkfunc">&gt;farm fresh//</span><br />And another one I listed before. Needs a hyphen.<br /><br />We had talked a bit about what you planned for the last chapter. I think that might be something pretty tricky to pull off, and since there&#039;s only one more to go anyway, I&#039;d also like to have a go at making an editing sweep on it like I&#039;ve done for the rest. So for bookkeeping purposes, I&#039;ll call this a Mars (so mark it as such when you resubmit), but really, it&#039;s closer to being in a holding pattern until you&#039;ve finished the last chapter. Any idea when that might be done?<br />

last chapter Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 367

>>132182
Last chapter here

https://www.fimfiction.net/chapter/737123
code ab.<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132182" onclick="return highlight('132182', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132182">&gt;&gt;132182</a><br />Last chapter here<br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" class="externallink" href="https://www.fimfiction.net/chapter/737123">https://www.fimfiction.net/chapter/737123</a><br />code ab.<br />

Finished Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 368

>>132182
I finished your suggested corrections, including the ones I missed before, and I took you up on refreshing Sunset's motivations at the beginning of chapter one. It was a good idea and it really set up her being bullied and not fighting back.

<a href="http://www.ponychan.net/chan/fic/res/128883.html#132182" onclick="return highlight('132182', true);" class="ref|fic|128883|132182">&gt;&gt;132182</a><br />I finished your suggested corrections, including the ones I missed before, and I took you up on refreshing Sunset&#039;s motivations at the beginning of chapter one. It was a good idea and it really set up her being bullied and not fighting back.<br />

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 369

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Twilight Velvet walked along what she assumed was a path through the woods. It was hard to tell, really, since it didn't seem like a lot of ponies traversed this area.//

This doesn't really address what makes it seem like a path. Set the scene better. What makes it look like one? What makes it look like it isn't? Attaching it to an estimation of traffic is a bit of a disconnect.

>She'd never even seen plants like that.//

Like what? I get no sense of what's different about them. Does she have some expertise in jungle plants? Give me a few details about what stands out about them to her.

Now that I'm at the end of the first paragraph, I'll point out that I counted 9 "to be" verbs already. These are inherently boring verbs. It's much more interesting to read about what happens not what is. You should be choosing more active verbs. It's not practical to get rid of them completely, but every bit helps. It's especially important to grab the reader's interest right at the beginning, and keeping things active will go a long way toward that.

>Quietly she wondered how she'd gotten stuck with this assignment as she rechecked the map to make out her position on the winding path.//

This might do fine with an omniscient narrator, but you took a conversational tone in the character's perspective already (note the sentence with an ellipsis, for example), so it's not nevessary to inform the reader that a character thought or wanted or wished something, since the narrator can simply express that. If she wonders how she got stuck with the assignment, just have the narrator ask the question in her stead. Then it's implicit that she wonders.

>As a result, she'd brought the story of her popular title character in a book series to a satisfying conclusion and declared it finished.//

I'm guessing you're trying to obscure which series and character to hold it as a surprise for later, but it comes off as a bit artificial. The narration is essentially the character's thoughts, so if the narrator prefers to think about them in generic terms or avoid the topic, that implies the character does as well, yet there's no motivation for her to do so.

>putting the map away in her saddlebags//

This is a pretty common oversight. You have her putting one map in multiple saddlebags.

>She wondered why anypony would willingly live out in the middle of nowhere like this.//

Again telling me what she wonders. You can get away with this some, but don't abuse it.

>She got a good view of the little cottage as she approached, and found it to be in disrepair. The thatched roof didn't look like it was completely watertight, and the wood seemed to be rotting in one corner of the house.//

Look at this pair of sentences. The first has a comma with a conjunction that's separating a compound verb that serves a single subject (She got… and found). The second has a comma that separates clauses, each with its own subject and verb (roof didn't look…, and… wood… seemed). The second is correct, but the first doesn't need the comma, unless there are more than two items in the compound structure or one of the items is long and complex enough that the comma helps organization. Just keep an eye on the difference as you scan through the story.

>Reasoning that she did have the right address after all//

Be careful of over-explaining character motivations. This is the same issue as having her wonder. If she thinks she might not have the right address, just have her or the narrator ask the question.

>It seemed like the occupant was taking a shower.//

You also use this "seem" language a lot so far. For one thing, it's vague and forces a conclusion on the reader. For another, it gets repetitive.

>a tropical helmet//

The proper name is a pith helmet, if you want to use that. Though since it's told from Velvet's perspective, maybe she doesn't know that. If not, it's a little odd for her to refer to it as a helmet at all and not a hat.

>leather whip//

As in the tanned hide of a dead sentient cow?

>plain, brown//

These are hierarchical adjectives and don't need a comma between them.

>package?//

You'll normally italicize a question mark or exclamation mark when it's on an italicized word.

>Knowing how unnerving the first meeting with a new editor could be//

More of this over-explanation of her motives.

>'Miss Adventure and the Quest for the Sapphire Statue.'//

Book titles should be underlined or (preferably) in italics.

>the pony who had written that manuscript//

This is a rather long way to say something we already know.

>a confused look//

Have a look at the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. The short version is that you should make her look and act confused, then let me draw the conclusion from the evidence.

>she saw the pegasus pick up the wrapped package//

You're using a lot of these descriptors in the story. There's a brief discussion of them under "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome" at the top of this thread.

>Bang!//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 370

>>369
>she felt completely clueless as to what was suddenly going on//
Make her act as if this is the case. Don't just say it outright.

>to make a good first impression//

The way this is worded, it's ambiguous whether it's referring to Velvet or Yearling. I know you meant Velvet, but it's a detail that's extraneous to what's happening, so it feels wedged in there.

>Thinking he was clear, the diamond dog didn't realize what was happening until one of his feet hit a pearl rolling along the floor.//

There's no way Velvet would know what the diamond dog was thinking or realizing. You've transferred the perspective over to him, and then you don't even stay there. I have a section on that as well, under "head hopping."

>With a yelp, his leg shot up in front of him//

It sounds like it was his leg that yelped.

>Gottcha//

Gotcha

>Clonk!//

Another sound effect in narration.

>the unicorn, whose horn was still glowing from throwing the inkwell//

This is even more obtrusive than a normal instance of LUS because the story is in Velvet's perspective. Having the narrator refer to her like this implies that this is how she thinks of herself. Surely, she wouldn't refer to herself as "the unicorn." Look for spots where she does. I noticed several others.

>in awe//

Another spot of telly language.

>dim-wits//

dimwits

>The pegasus mare considered that.//

It can be a little clunky to use demonstratives (this, that, these, those) as pronouns in narration, since they often refer to entire sentences. This might not be so bad on its own, but you use one again in the following quote, which refers to the same thing, so it feels repetitive.

>dead-panned//

deadpanned

>… I got it!//

A leading ellipsis doesn't really work in the middle of dialogue, unless you didn't mean to end the previous sentence with a period.

>the bout of fear//

Let me see this. Show the fleeting thoughts going through her head of what might have gone wrong. Show me the physical symptoms that her fear causes. Show me her relief when she sees that everything's fine.

>guiltily//

Show me.

>mommy//

When used as a term of address, this would be capitalized. This happens a couple times.

>Reading?//

Twilight's old enough to speak complete sentences, and yet hasn't heard of reading or books? Most parents read their children books before they can even comprehend them, and I'd have to imagine someone whose job involves reading would do so. This just doesn't ring true.

>a serious expression//

Describe it.

>Placing her daughter and the book on her back with her magic, she carried them over to Twilight's room.//

Note tha participles imply simultaneous action, so you have her putting stuff on her back at the same time she carries them off, while they'd more likely occur in sequence.

This is a cute story, but it doesn't have that much impact. What typically drives a story forward will be some sort of conflict or character growth. You do have a small one here where Velvet comes to understand Yearling's writing style, but it's muted, and there's never any clash there or doubt that it's going to work out. Yearling immediately agrees to it, and Velvet never has any sort of internal crisis over adjusting her preconceptions of Yearling's writing or any particular feelings of returning to that side of the career. Early on, you play up that Velvet used to be a writer, so what are her feelings about getting back to that? There's a strong angle you could play. Or have Yearling more resistant to editing of her work. She's so matter-of-fact about it.

Think about it this way: what do you want the reader to take away from this story? Is there a message? Is there some new appreciation for a character? I think you have both of those, but they're either very subtle (Yearling learning how to collaborate and accept modification of her writing, Velvet realizing that Yearling's writing is based on real events) or dropped entirely (Velvet rekindling a love for writing).

Most of these things are quick fixes or a matter of a bit of rephrasing, but I'd like you to work on giving the story that momentum that comes from character growth or conflict. You already have the motive in place for that, so it shouldn't be hard. I think this story shows promise, and with a little more effort, I could see posting it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 371

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

A word about first impressions: The reader is here for action and/or character. Get to one or the other as quickly as possible. Not that you postpone it awfully long, but the key word in this case is action. You have five "to be" verbs in your first three sentences. These are inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens. It's impractical to rid a story of them altogether, but you should strive for active language where possible, and right at the beginning, where you're trying to hook the reader, isn't the time to have the action grind to a halt. Even if there's not motion, it's not hard to phrase most things with active language.

>disinterested//

A lot of writers use this word in not the quite situation. It doesn't exactly mean "has no interest." It's closer to "once had an interest, but no longer," and that's an odd way to refer to it, given how your discussion goes on afterward.

>to partake in//

A fine point here, but you're using a fairly subjective narrator who adopts a conversational style. This implies that the narrator is in that character's perspective and essentially speaks her thoughts for her. So it's important for those thoughts to sound like something she'd say out loud, in terms of vocabulary, word choice, phrasing, and personality. This just sounds odd for something Babs would ever say in conversation, so it also sounds odd for her limited narration.

>Not a physical battle she had to defend in, but a verbal confrontation was always in order. Who would terrorise another for not earning their cutie mark yet? Only bullies, like she wasn’t.//

All that just sounds awkwardly phrased and overly formal for her.

>with her meal flat in front of her//

I'm not sure what "flat" is supposed to mean here.

>pre-occupied//

preoccupied

>Detention had to be given out to those who broke codes of conduct after all. Time after time, she had told them not to misbehave.//

I don't see the advantage of passive voice here. And I guess this is why she's alone? Her friends are in detention? That's not exactly what "preoccupied" means. That's closer to being distracted.

>finally getting around to reading the letter sent to her//

Sounds like it's fairly important to her, so why hasn't she mentioned it until now? Everything else has been pretty mundane observations, so it's not like the letter would have slipped her memory.

>It was rather relaxing and somewhat calming in her eyes.//

When you just say she's relaxed and calm, it somehow fails to come to life. Make her act, look, and sound like she's relaxed and calm, and it will be much more engaging to the reader.

>no doubt//

She already said she immediately recognized the writing, so this is both redundant and less certain.

>Or perhaps her true talent hadn’t shined yet.//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense, so it has to act on an object, like shoes or brass. You want "shone."

>pricked open the envelope//

I've never heard that expression before. Is it a Britishism?

>Babs was feeling chuffed//

There really is a lot of word choice and phrasing that sounds off for her. She's a young New Yorker, and this doesn't feel like that at all.

>She was already getting hints of envy towards her cousin//

Another case where it's far more powerful to demonstrate an emotion that say it outright. There's a short discussion about this in the "show versus tell" section at the top of this thread.

>The Apple family was large enough as it was, but with the Pie family as well…//

By what Apple Bloom says in the letter, she doesn't think Babs will know who Pinkie is. And yet she sure seems familiar with the Pie name, but there's no explanation given.

>odaeopgas//

This is not really creating the effect you want it to.

>She was… happy, for lack of anything else she could find. She started to feel like she was sharing Apple Bloom’s excitement.//

More direct naming of emotion.

>she graciously thought out loud//

What does "graciously" have to do with this?

>Pie, was it? Yes, she met that Pinkie Pie for a short while//

And yet she's already said something that made it sound like she knew of the Pie family.

>Having been a bully before about being a blank flank, would her new family member bully her now? She couldn’t, not with how happy she always was. She didn’t want that on her conscience.//

The way this is worded, it makes it sound like Surprise is the one who used to be a bully. That last sentence sure seems to be in the Pie filly's perspective. Why did you jump away from Babs?

>instead taking the tackle as thousands of thoughts chose to swim through her mind in that one particular moment//

That's very vague. I have no idea what any of these thought are or how they affect her, so why mention them? It's also somewhat repetitive with the use of "thought" earlier in the paragraph.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 372

>>371
>Babs grunted when she hit the ground//
You had her hit the ground two sentences ago, then had another sentence of narration. The she hits the ground again? Try to keep the timeline smooth, or it sounds choppy and doesn't quite make sense.

>The Pegasus gasped.//

Why do you keep referring to her as "the Pegasus" or "the Pie she knew"? Babs has been around this filly before, by her own admission, so why wouldn't she use her name?

>similarly like//

Awkward phrasing.

>motioning Surprise to come over, pointing towards her own letter.//

It's clunky to tack participial phrases in a row like that.

>excited to see another family’s perspective//

How does Babs know this? As stated, it's moved the narrator over into Surprise's head. To keep it with Babs, this would need to be in terms that Babs could perceive: what she sees, what she hears, that'd cause her to draw this conclusion.

>Babs’ only response was the blinking of her eyes.//

Awkward phrasing.

>made her full of joy//

This will mean a lot more if the reader can see it happen rather than just get a factual conclusion from the narrator.

>whole heartedly//

That should be one word. You did this more than once.

>with a certain charm//

I have no idea how this is supposed to look or sound.

>without any regard for normal sense//

This seemingly describes how they're walking. I have no idea what it's supposed to mean.

>raunchy//

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

>whenever he laid his hooves around//

Is that an idiom translated from another language? As is, it just sounds awkward.

>Taking a quick glimpse at the Pegasus, she seemed distraught, concerned.//

I can't tell whether you mean Babs or Surprise is distraught and concerned, and it's telly either way.

>finding herself trapped//

You just said she was trapped in the previous sentence.

>the memory of how she earned it seeping into her mind//

Watch your perspective. Babs couldn't know this.

>Surprise walked over towards Babs//

You just used "over towards" two sentences ago.

>wallowing stages//

I have no idea what this means.

There are a few consistent problems here. The first is a prevalence of telly language, and I've already pointed out the discussion at the top of this thread for that. There are a few slips in character perspective, and character motivations are often over-explained. Probably the biggest is just that the narrative voice is supposed to be a limited narrator for Babs, yet it doesn't sound like her at all. I'd expect it to sound not too different from how she speaks in canon, but this sounds awfully formal for her and uses some advanced word choice that don't fit her well. What the narration says is fine—it's just how it says it. Try to write this as you could envision Babs relating the whole thing out loud to a friend. If the average reader can imagine her speaking all this, it will sound natural for her narrative voicing, and it'll evoke her character a lot better.

The last thing is that there's not a strong story arc here. There could be, but part of that is in the emphasis and emotional weight the story applies to things. Babs is pleased to find this family member who will be a friend to her, but her reaction to it is fairly muted, and there's not really much focus on how her life is going to change afterward. There are two main ways to build tension in a story: create and resolve a conflict or show character growth. There is a conflict in the confrontation woth the bullies, but the main transformation deals with discovering Surprise is related to her, and there's no conflict there. And as to character growth, there's not any presentation of how Babs will be a different pony now that Surprise is her friend. It seems like a fine enough scene, but there's not really a full story arc that gives the reader some message to take away or new appreciation for one of the characters.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 373

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the cellist//

Seems odd for Vinyl to refer to Octavia that way. A third-person narrator, sure, but not her best friend.

>red haired//

As a first-person narrator, I'll give her some leeway on certain common grammatical mistakes, since the narration is essentially dialogue, and the errors can be attributed to her and not you. Though there are some that aren't affected by speech, and this is one. When you use a multi-word phrase like this as a single descriptor, hyphenate it.

>gravely//

gravelly

>I’m sure you notice//

Typo.

>in(ironically)//

Missing space.

>I said, ‘tell//

Capitalization.

>he turned on his heal//

Heel/heal mix-up.

>music(I//

Another missing space. Looks this might be a chronic problem with parentheses. You should probably Ctrl-f for them to check.

>Violinist//

Why is this capitalized?

>Fleur De Lees//

There are two common spellings used, but this isn't one of them. Canon is apparently "Fleur Dis Lee," while the proper real-world term would be "Fleur de Lis."

>Naturally, it didn’t register that Roamer might actually be Roman, which may, or may not, have been Red’s real name.//

Okay, this is creating a disconnect. This is stated very calmly, which doesn't fit with someone whose car has just been wrecked. That opens up the possibility that this story is being framed as her retelling the events at some point in the future, when she would actually have the time to reflect calmly like this. But then you run into the issue of defining who her audience is. If she's telling it long after the fact, someone's listening, so who? Why do they want to? Why does she want them to hear it? It's probably much easier just to keep her in the moment and limit her thinking to what she'd reasonably do under the circumstances.

>minute’s//

Why the apostrophe?

>hill top//

hilltop

>Frie-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread. You do this a lot.

>he pulled his helmet on, and started up the Ninja//

You don't need that comma. It's all one clause.

>sounding genuinely concerned for my safety//

That's kind of ungainly and over-explains his motivation.

>One I told him that I was secured//

Typo.

>almost no body fat//

That's a really odd thing for her to point out. Unless she's Japanese, I guess. They seem obsessed with that.

>But it hadn’t, it was behind me.//

I don't get why this is a big deal. Whether his hair was right in her face or not, she saw it, so it'd be on her mind.

>I said, Following Tavi into the kitchen//

Capitalization.

>OH//

Italics are preferred over all caps for emphasis

>I sat down at our little kitchen table, as she went to work at the counter.//

Note that "as" clauses are one of the common ones to circumvent the "commas between clauses" rule, since it can take on different meanings. With a comma, the "as" tends to take on the meaning of "because," while without one, it tends to mean "at the same time that."

>lockers….//

A four-dot ellipsis is typically used only in formal writing, like technical papers, but this isn't wrong. I just haven't noticed one until now, so you may be using them inconsistently.

>my friends eyes//

Missing apostrophe.

>massive bosom//

Really? I mean… I guess you can reinvent them how you want, but the EqG character design has them all as vaguely small.

>now happy//

hyphenate

>If you’re confused about our little chat, let me turn on the flood light.//

Okay, I'd count this as a pretty big mistake. We're pretty far into the story by now, and she hasn't addressed the reader directly until now. For one, that makes it inconsistent. If you're going to do so, you need to start early to establish it, and you need to have it happen pretty regularly to keep it up. Second, it opens a can of worms as to whom she's addressing. Why does she want to tell me the story? Under what circumstances is she doing so? Why do I want to listen? Who am I to her? It's often better to avoid all that.

>eight//

capitalization

This whole discussion of her illness seems rather forced. It's not particularly relevant, at least not so far, yet all of a sudden, it's a huge deal. It could be explained in much simpler terms, and you don't want to bore the reader with technical details that don't matter.

>My parent’s tried really hard to find a cure//

Why is that apostrophe there? And this makes it sound like her parents are researchers, not just regular folks consulting doctors.

>I’m not helpless, I can walk and climb stairs and drive and stuff//

Comma splice.

>But,//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't. And then you do it again later in the same scene.

I don't see the point of that scene. It could have been summed up in just one or two paragraphs and incorporated into another scene. It breaks the action of the scenes surrounding it, and with the way it addresses the reader, it just sticks out as a poor fit.

>church//

Kind of makes me wonder what that entails in this universe. Do you see this as actually Earth, or is it something different? If it ends up being important to the plot, this might bear some explanation to support the world-building, but if it's just going to be a throwaway comment, then it doesn't matter.

>neither is Norman, he just goes because his grandmother asks him to//

Comma splice.

>“UUUGH!” I groaned exaggeratedly//

Italics are preferred here again, and it's odd to see her use "exaggeratedly" about herself. The point of deliberately exaggerating is to create an effect, so would it be foremost on her mind what she's trying to accomplish with it? Have her say that instead.

>telling me that my food was done//

This is obvious and can be cut.

>with it’s white clad rider//

Its/it's confusion, white-clad

>walking over to the window, and leaning against the sill//

Unnecessary comma.

>sipping his coffee//

How does she see this? She's described as eavesdropping, but that doesn't necessarily mean she can see them.

>“Well, that’s needlessly secretive,” My roommate commented, and stood up to untangle my brush.//

Capitalization. And I'm finally going to say that you use this ["Quote," she said, and did another action] structure a lot to the point it's gotten repetitive.

>And doesn’t it spark//

I think you got a couple of words out of order.

>My hairs as long as Vice-Principal Luna’s//

Missing apostrophe, and you don't need that hyphen.

>I wont lie//

Missing apostrophe.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 374

>>373
>and ran out to door//
Typo.

>After a few minutes, a brown cab pulled up beside her and she got in, and was whisked away.//

That's some clunky phrasing with those piled-up "and"s.

>cool looking//

Hyphenate.

>and shoulders//

Extraneous space.

>The weirdest thing about it though, was that it fit me.//

Either get rid of that comma or pair it with another before "though."

>to find a decent tree for shade//

If it's that cold out, why does he want shade? Maybe there's an explanation for it, but if so, Vinyl doesn't know, so why doesn't it surprise her?

>“then//

Capitalization.

>What was surprising, was that he was smiling.//

There's no reason for that comma to be there.

>He was staring at the tablet in his hands, and smiling a little crooked half-smile.//

Same deal.

>Sad, and beautiful.//

And again.

>I could see the sorrow in his eyes//

So why don't I get to? Describe what it looks like, or it's a pretty cold fact that doesn't connect me to that character.

>2//

Spell out numbers that short.

>I said the last part with a little bit of a bite, making it obvious that I was annoyed.//

That syntax doesn't work for an attribution, and don't over-explain her motive. Imply it without saying it outright.

If she's supposed to be friends with Applejack, they sure don't act like it. This is the first time we've seen them together, but Vinyl's just deliberately antagonizing her and doesn't seem to have any fondness for her at all.

>We just played a bunch of songs we all knew by heart, heck I knew them by heart and I wasn’t even a core member! //

Comma splice.

>synch//

Usually just spelled "sync."

>pinkie//

Capitalization.

By now, I'm noticing a lot of these simple editing errors, and I'm taking up way too much space on them. Few of them are consistent, so they just appear to be careless errors. Please do a more careful job of editing your work.

>If you were wondering//

Addressing the reader again.

>it’s audio equalizer program.//

Its/it's confusion.

>dead trees//

They're not really dead, right? Just dormant for the winter.

>saying absolutely nothing for almost an entire hour//

That's really weird that the break would even last that long and that Rarity would urgently drag her out there, then say nothing for an hour. It doesn't ring true.

>We weren’t close, still aren’t, really.//

And yet the story's had him at her place multiple times already, and he's at her beck and call.

>But, there was always something about him I liked//

Stop putting those commas after "but." Commas aren't for dramatic pauses.

>She stopped and put her thumb and forefinger to her chin, resting the connected arm’s elbow on top of the other.//

That is a really clunky description.

>I think, that for a while//

Unnecessary comma.

>I think//

Rarity uses this phrase three sentences in a row.

>six month//

Hyphenate.

>anniversary, She//

Capitalization.

>its self//

itself

>Claustrophobic//

Why is that capitalized? And for the obvious question, if he was locked in the closet for three days, how did he eat? Drink? Use the bathroom?

>trailing down her cheeks//

You use that exact phrase twice in the same paragraph.

At this point, I need to talk about piling on. This is when you try and come up with the most horrible situation possible in an attempt to have the highest emotional impact on the reader. The problem is that it often backfires. The reader knows when things just get too over-the-top to be plausible, and it just makes the story less relatable. Less is more. Tragedy should be the minimum amount necessary for the plot to work.

>She wailed, for a long time//

Unnecessary comma.

>rainbow haired//

Hyphenate.

>Rarirty//

Typo.

>Maybe, I should talk to him//

Unnecessary comma.

>red haired//

Hyphenate.

>tucked under his arm. His hair was no longer tucked//

Watch the word repetition.

>stetson//

That's a proper noun.

>My Lady//

Why is that capitalized?

>who were all putting away their equipment, and preparing to leave//

> I noticed Rarity had yet to leave, and was sitting on her instrument case.//
Unnecessary commas.

>She looked so sad.//

And what does that look like?

>in confusion//

Make her look and act confused.

So the good news is that I like the story enough that I cared to go into this much detail about it. The bad news is that I've encountered enough problems by now that I'm going to have to stop here. So please take these points and apply them to the rest of your chapters as well. If these first two look good when you resubmit (if you do), then I'll move on to the rest of the chapters. But if I'm still spending a lot of time correcting editing errors that you really should have caught yourself, then it's going to take me that much longer to get through all of it. So make both of our jobs easier and have a good editing pass.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 612

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>cutting her off//

It isn't necessary to narrate a cutoff when we can already see it in the punctuation.

>But, Trixie has another idea.//

It's rarely correct to place a comma after a conjunction. This one is not. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>favour//

Something just seems funny about having Apple Bloom in particular use this spelling, when you've taken care to write a southern American accent for her.

>her face stretching//

Kind of straining for the visual joke there.

>She wobbled in place, stumbling into Scootaloo and knocking them both down.//

Note that participles imply concurrent action, while these would more likely happen one after the other. Here at the beginning of chapter 2, it could also use a little more flavor to the narration. You're relying pretty heavily on the dialogue, but this isn't exactly a character moment. Set the scene a little better and give me more of what they're doing as they talk.

>ground, spreading her hooves on the ground//

Watch that close repetition.

>The three foals shared confused looks//

Could use a bit of showing.

>Trixie then lifted her hat back up//

Kind of repetitive with the "then" two sentences back.

>Focus on the image of Ponyville in your mind and the gem’s light will point the way.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>home.” Trixie replied.//

Punctuation error.

>“Can we stay the night?”//

And they don't assume their sisters will wonder what happened to them?

>We gotta get home before our sisters wonder about us//

My point exactly. They were gone all night and were never missed?

>I’m a unicorn//

>The orange one is mouthy//
>Trixie heard the wagon creak//
>Her mouth was set in a small frown//
>We call ourselves the Cutie Mark Crusaders//
>when she opened them again//
>as she is quite tired//
>Trixie resumed walking//
>Scootaloo thrust her body up//
>Her body lit up blue//
>is there anything else //
>It swung in//
Needs a comma after this to separate clauses.

>wagon wheels grinding//

Repetitive use of some form of "grind" within the paragraph.

>She made a face//

That's incredibly vague and unhelpful.

>an odd expression on her face//

Again vague, though it's possible Scootaloo can't quite identify it... except why are you in Scootaloo's perspective anyway? The scene had been from Trixie's so far, and she wouldn't call her own expression odd.

>Apple Bloom and Scootaloo shared a look with Sweetie Belle.//

And more vagueness.

>She flipped through the pages; the text and illustrations had begun to fade, and the pages were creased and torn.//

So wouldn't she be careful with it?

>… Twilight’s//

Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis.

>“Applejack! Don’t worry, we’re—"//

You've mixed styles of quotation marks. You might need to do a sweep through for these, as they're easy to miss.

>Applejack trailed off//

It's generally not advantageous to narrate trailing off or cutting off when it's already apparent from the punctuation.

>Recognition glinted in her eyes.//

What does this look like?

>Applejack frowned, but didn’t respond.//

Opposite side of the comma issue. This is all one clause, and the comma doesn't disambiguate or help organize anything.

>streak of rainbow color streaking//

Watch the repetition.

>slowed down and descended//

Missing the end punctuation, and be consistent with your Oxford commas.

>moment//

Watch how often you're using this word.

>looked//

Also pay attention to how often you're using this. Not only is it getting repetitive, but it's usually used in a vague way.

>Spike walked up beside Rarity and patted her on the head with a smirk.//

Patted Rarity on the head? It'd be tough for him to reach, and he doesn't act that familiarly with her. Or if this is supposed to refer to Sweetie Belle, it's confusing.

>looked away as Trixie looked her up and down. She then leaned to the side and looked//

Seriously, stop using that word.

>“She doesn’t?”//

Why would Spike ask this? Twilight has never stood for formality on that, and he's always been around to see that.

>Trixie gave her an annoyed look.//

So let me see it and make my own judgment. You'd been good at avoiding telly language in the story, but this really isn't the spot for it.

>walked out of her view to the far end of the wagon while Twilight walked//

More repetition.

>leaving a rainbow trail//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>She pointed a hoof between their eyes//

That's kind of a repetitive phrasing to what she did before.

>shining purple and blue crystals rising above the small table the two were sitting at//

This is really confusing. I'm not sure if it's some sort of direct object of what Trixie's looking at, an absolute phrase, or some imagery for Trixie's eyes, but it doesn't parse.

>Trixie popped a cherry//

That's a really unfortunate choice of phrasing. I'd encourage you to change it, lest it be taken in a lewd manner.

>loathe//

This is a verb. The adjective form you want is "loath."

>Trixie cut her pancakes and stabbed a fork into the piece of the stack she’d cut.//

>Trixie cut her knife into the pancakes again and held Twilight’s gaze.//
>instead lifting another fork of pancakes to her mouth.//
>Trixie looked at her pancakes.//
>Trixie looked at her half-finished pancakes and used her fork to cut off another piece.//
I'll give you credit for using words like "again" and "another" to acknowledge the repetition, but there's a limit. Usually, it's ponies sharing tea where authors suddenly lose their imaginations and can't think of anything to have that characters do than "take a sip" over and over again. Surely you can come up with some more variety than this.

>weight-lifting//

weightlifting

> there is no better unicorn in all of Equestria to help you get your cutie marks, than the Great and Powerful Trixie!//

There is no grammatical reason to have a comma there.

>Trixie lowered her head to look at her, a smirk on her lips.//

Note that this is the third sentence in a row that ends with an absolute phrase.

>out-perform//

outperform

So I pointed out a few words you tended to repeat in chapter 3. Here are counts for a number of words that authors tend to overuse:
Look: 38. Quite high for this word count. That's about once every 2 or 3 paragraphs.
Walk/trot: 11. Not bad, but there are places where they're clustered.
Turn: 14. Not bad, and they're spaced out well.
Just: 6. Very good.
Various forms of "to be": 82. Actually kind of up there. I didn't expect it to be that high, honestly, and that's a testament to how engaging the work was that it didn't stand out to me. That's about once every 3 sentences, which is right around the tipping point of too many. Keep in mind that this is a boring verb, and this is how often something doesn't happen. You want your story to be active. You do get a reprieve, somewhat, for ones that occur in dialogue. It might be worth cleaning these up a little, but it obviously wasn't bad enough that it stuck out.

So I liked this story. I don't have any big plot or character problems with it, which are the time-consuming ones to fix. These are more or less cosmetic, but there are enough of them that I'd want to give it a quick glance when it comes back. Unless something goes horribly awry, I don't see any problems approving it when it returns. Please select the "back from Mars" option when you resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 632

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“Coming, mom!”//

When used in place of a name (as in "Mom" vs. "my mom"), it gets capitalized.

>Shrugging off the disappointment//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>down the stairs in an impressive slide down//

Watch the close word repetition.

>Picking herself up and looking around to make sure no one had caught that embarrassing trick gone wrong, Scootaloo ran to the kitchen.//

Note that participles imply simultaneous action, so she picks herself up and looks around at the same time she runs to the kitchen. They'd probably happen in order, not all at the same time.

>her landing was just as graceful as her previous attempts and she ended up trying to make-out with the leg of the kitchen table.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, and as the term is used here, "make out" shouldn't have a hyphen.

>golden coated//

But that one does need a hyphen. You're using the entire phrase as a single modifier.

>where her golden needle cutie mark lie//

lay

>brussel//

brussels

>Scootaloo gaged, sticking out her tongue and making loud retching sounds.//

Typo. I'm also getting inconsistent narration here. She'd have a strong emotion about this, yet the narrator presents it so factually. Same goes for the line about her accepting her plate of breakfast. You've definitely taken a limited narrative voice and used it to good effect elsewhere, yet here are two glaring examples of where it could serve you most, and you back off from it.

>Kissing her daughter’s head, Golden whispered//

Another case where a participle synchronizes two actions than probably shouldn't be.

>Hey, dad, how ya doing?//

Capitalization.

>entire civilizations are driven murderously insane?//

Needs a comma to set off the preceding dependent clause.

>happy to see something that wasn’t green and leafy for once//

Watch your perspective. Without framing this as Scootaloo's interpretation, or at least by giving it in terms that any external observer could see, including her, you're putting the narrator in his head now.

>Cthulhu already knew what she was going to ask//

And you're still with him.

>Torque//

I honestly can't tell what you're doing with his speech. At times, it seems like you're having him speak very grandiloquently, applying dark phrasings to ordinary things in an almost anit-euphemism way. Yet other times, if seems like he's just uttering random words. It's giving things an inconsistent feel. For my money, the former would be much funnier.

>Scootaloo’s muzzle screwed up into a mask of disgust and she stuck her tongue out.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. I can't tell what the narrator's perspective is here, and I scrolled ahead a page or so to see. It stays pretty omniscient through this part. You need to even that out. If this is supposed to be Scootaloo's viewpoint, it's odd for her to essentially say this about herself, identifying the look as disgusted rather than the actual emotion she's feeling. Either way, it's telly.

>a degree in finances//

In that sense, I've only ever heard it as "finance."

>I’dunno//

Why is that apostrophe there? What letters are missing there? You use this one more than once.

>Hey dad,//

Needs an additional comma for direct address, and capitalization again.

>Plus, it’s boooooooring.//

No reason to have a comma after the conjunction here.

>Mister Grumpy-pants//

Capitalize "Pants." You don't really even need the hyphen.

>twix//

Did you mean "twixt"?

>‘emergency parent-teacher conference'//

See how you're mixing styles of quotation marks there? You might need to scan through on your own for this, since they can be tough to catch.

>Particularly her husband, who she was fixating with an angry stare that burned right through his newspaper.//

And now you're in her perspective. That should be a "whom," and you want "fixing."

>Hey dad//

Comma, capitalization.

>Aunt Flow//

You're making the joke too obvious. Why would Scootaloo assume that spelling, after all? The standard would be Aunt Flo.

>fully-loaded//

Adverbs ending in -ly are the exception; in two-word phrasings, they don't take hyphens.

>Disgruntled at the constant annoyance of school//

That's pretty telly, and while I could excuse it on the grounds of being an unimportant moment and sentiment, it also sums up a lot of things extraneous to the story and not in evidence.

>right mom//

Comma and capitalization.

>lets make sure you have everything//

Typo.

>her small-wings buzzing//

Why is that hyphen there?

>She still felt a burst of anxiety whenever she saw her little girl ride that death trap.//

Okay, you're definitely in Golden's perspective now, and since you want to stay at the house after Scootaloo leaves, that's reasonable. It's fine to shift perspectives, as long as it;s not too abrupt or often. You did pull back to an omniscient feel before going with the mother, and while you probably left it as omniscient too long, it was at least a smooth transition. I don't see the value in the brief time you spent in Cthulhu's perspective, but the rest works fine.

>who was still reading his newspaper//

>because you’re back on your diet//
Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>Closing the door he set off at a brisk pace//

Would need a comma for the participial phrase, but it's another phrase that synchronizes things badly.

>He knew she was looking out for him and his expanding waistline//

I have mixed feelings about this perspective shift, since you barely spend any time there. You could have gone with him instead of Golden ever since you left Scootaloo, if that was your intent, but it's not unprecedented in comedy especially to do a quick perspective change at the end of a scene. So it probably stands fine as is.

>free fair//

Assuming I understand your usage here, that she's giving them a free ride to school, you want "fare."

>‘nuff//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Copy one in the right way from somewhere else.

>rounding the last corner into Ponyville and only a dozen yards from their final destination, two familiar obstacles strode out into their path//

As you've worded it, the participial phrase describes the obstacles, not Scootaloo.

>with disdain//

Let me see it, either as a description or through her behavior. This is just a dry word on a page,

>which the two had practiced to perfection over many long weekends for just such an occasion//

Now you're in Silver Spoon's and Diamond Tiara's perspective. Fine shade of wording here, but if you'd said "which the two must have practiced..." it would still be within Scootaloo's viewpoint. That way, it's her opinion, not stating something as a fact that she couldn't know for sure, unless she says how she knows, like adding that she'd seen them doing so.

>“Do you?”//

When a question mark or exclamation mark is on an italicized word, you'll normally italicize it as well.

>let out an exasperated sighed//

Typo.

>inflating her smugness and superiority//

Fairly telly, but it also over-explains her motivation. Just leave it at the sneer. That's enough.

>I’dunno//

Stop doing that.

>sycophantic//

In a limited narration, don't use word choice and phrasing that the viewpoint character wouldn't. I really doubt Scootaloo knows this word. In fact, it doesn't quite fit. It implies being submissive, which they're not. At least not both of them. You could imply one was obviously the ringleader, but that wouldn't be reason for both of them to laugh like this.

>they grabbed a seat at one of the lunch tables just outside school//

Wait, they just got there, and it's lunchtime already?

>wouldn’t you had gotten apples instead//

Typo.

>I wanted cupcakes//

Comma needed between the clauses.

>what the contents contained//

The contents don't contain anything...

>All she could make out was a bunch of squishy noises that sickened her very soul and caused her breath to frost the air.//

And now you're in Sweetie Belle's head. Keep if with Scootaloo and just have Sweetie Belle make a face or say something about this. There's no reason to do a perspective shift for it.

>He’d ended up with the lunch bag meant for their daughter.//

It kind of kills the joke when it was already obvious and you explain it anyway.

>He smirked as he pictured his wife’s smug face when he told her about what had happened.//

He hasn't already told her. The tense is off.

>mom//

Capitalization.

>aforementioned//

This is rather self-aware of the narration, and you haven't been taking that tone before, so it's inconsistent.

>all of the sudden

All of a sudden

>their//

Number mismatch, as the antecedent is "lightning."

>Eye rolling back into her head//

She only has one eye?

>school house//

schoolhouse

>Scootaloo feared that her life was about to end in a moment of terror and confusion.//

So make her act like she feels this way. This is a bland fact.

>Yeah, I know that mom mixed up the lunches.//

Capitalization.

>Rolling her eyes//

Comma to set off the participial phrase.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 633

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The bird were singing//

Typo.

>Oh well. I guess I’ll take a nap break after I get some lunch. Naps are always nice anyways.//

I guess I don't see much point in putting quoted thoughts in a first-person narration, since that's what the narration already is. Th only time that'd make sense to me is if the first-person narrator is telling the story to an audience some time after it happened, and she's relating what her thoughts were at the time. I see that you do work the narration more to that angle at times, but then presenting the thoughts as unattributed quotes works against that feeling.

>tell Carrot or I//

People use "I" incorrectly all the time because they're afraid of sounding wrong. "Me" is appropriate here, since it's the direct object of "tell." "Carrot or I" is just a compound object, so if you reduce it to "I," you wouldn't say "tell I."

>Oh my gosh!//

>And I have no idea what to say to that!//
>tiiiiiiiicklish?//
>alone?//
When you have an exclamation or question mark on an italicized word, you'll normally italicize it as well.

>day or two//

The way you're using this, hyphenate it.

>“Except maybe Applejack. She probably is doing something on the farm.//

Missing the closing quotes.

>which caused her to smile back//

A little repetitive in phrasing with the "step back" a couple paragraphs ago.

>I smiled as I laid there and watched her.//

A confusing verb that many people get wrong. You wat "lay" here.

>Her eyes snapped instantly awake//

Something's off about that. It's not her eyes that woke up.

>I laid down.//

"Lay" again. By now, I'm noticing that you use an awful lot of these short sentences that begin with the subject. Sometimes, they may make up 75 or 80 percent of aparagraph, and they can create a repetitive feel. Overall, not so much, at least in your case, but sometimes locally. It might be worth tossing in a little more variety here and there, if you're up for it.

>S—stop//

>P—Pl//
Be consistent with your capitalization. And if you mean for these to be stutters, then use hyphens between the partial words.

>My ears drooped.//

This really feels like an afterthought, and a weak one at that. She's had so many stronger emotional cues, and then this gets tacked on the end. Seems like they would have already drooped anyway.

>I just laid there//

>So I just laid there//
>I just laid there//
>I laid there//
"Lay." You got it right once... By the way, see how repetitive those are?

>“When you fell ill… it was just too perfect to pass up.”//

Okay, I'll go ahead and voice the main issue I had with this plan. Fluttershy was planning to kiss her? While she was sick? She'd probably feel like crap and not want to deal with unexpected things. Not to mention she'd thrown up already, could well do so again, and now has morning breath after sleeping all afternoon and night? I could maybe buy that as a spur-of-the-moment thing, but as it's been planned out, it just seems rather poorly planned out.

And it doesn't quite make sense to me, anyway, how this played out. When Mrs. Cake saw how upset Pinkie was and that she didn't want Fluttershy to leave, wouldn't she go talk to Fluttershy for her? And why haven't any of her friends gone to Fluttershy either? Seems like a little communication between Mrs. Cake and Pinkie's friends would clear everything up, and Mrs. Cake should know that.

>plot//

Just be aware that this is a very cliched term by now, and it doesn't fit with the story's tone very well.

>I paused, bring a hoof to my chin.//

Typo.

>“Eh, “love” is a strong word. It’s way too mushy and stuff.”//

>“Oh come on! I still care! I just… don’t like the “l” word.”//
>““We”?”//
When you're nesting quotations, use single quotation marks for the inner set.

>Looking at each other, we all walked in, following each other in a straight line.//

Kind of clunky to have two participial phrases so close to each other like that.

>Fluttershy’s house wasn’t too different from normal.//

>But it was quieter than normal.//
Kind of repetiive.

>Twilight frowned. “They’re going up to Fluttershy’s room.”//

And no further reaction from Rarity? Still scared, grudging acceptance, etc.?

>Fluttershy wiggled and squirmed her way out from under all the blankets. Squiggled, if you will. It was not a very graceful maneuver. One of her hooves caught in the blankets, and she hit the floor face-first.//

The way it was described, the other girls went in first. So how does Pinkie see this? If she can't then she wouldn't be able to narrate what she doesn't witness. Maybe she's peeking through the door so that Fluttershy can't see her, but that deserves to be said.

>I can live without Pinkie’s love.//

That's rather melodramatic and jumping to conclusions. It's not like Pinkie reacted badly.

>“Shy, I—”//

You spent all of the first chapter tacking an apostrophe on the beginning of that nickname. It's really not necessary, but if you're going to do it, be consistent.

>I never should have kissed you. I didn’t know if you liked me, or if you were even okay with the idea, or anything.//

And herein lies another problem. This is the plot of well over half the shipping stories out there. Not only is it cliched, it's pretty unrealistic. Who goes for a kiss when they don't even know if the other person likes them at all?

Now, a few words that stood out to me as turning up a lot.

Actually: It appears 8 times in chapter 1, but only once in chapter 2. The problem is that when it does occur in chapter 1, it gets used a few times in a close space. The first two are near each other, so are the next two, and so are the final three. It makes them feel like they appear more often than they really do.

Some form of "giggle:" 14 times in chapter 1, 5 in chapter 2. This has the same issue—those totals aren't that bad (well, 14 is getting up there for that word count), but they tend to occur in clusters.

Just: 51 times in chapter 1 and 20 more in chapter 2. That's a lot, both because they cluster some and from raw numbers. It's a word many authors have trouble avoiding overuse of, but it's definitely worth it to get that under control.

I asked another pre-reader for a second opinion in case I was beating on it for being a very unoriginal plot unfairly, but he agreed. For what it's worth, I liked Pinkie's voicing, but he didn't, and he found the sheer number of puke mentions to be off-putting.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 635

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Leaves crunched beneath their hooves, making the silence between them even more uncomfortable for Thunderlane.//

It's a little ungainly for the first character references to be by pronoun, since they work by antecedent. Even something vague like "the two ponies" can work. There are times it works for artistic purposes, but you're not going for that feel here, At least you do identify Thunderlane immediately after, but you keep referring to "her" for a while before we get a noun.

>his face contorted in shock//

I'm cheating by reading ahead a bit, but you take his perspective for a limited narration, yet this has an external feel to it. If he's really shocked, have the narration sound shocked. Don't just identify it as such and so calmly.

>Sun//

Why is that capitalized?

>Thunderlane stomach lurched and he turned to her fully.//

Typo, and you need a comma between the clauses.

>His goal here was to cheer Derpy up//

This is something closely related to being telly: over-explaining character motivations. Let the narration carry this more subtly.

>Grinding his teeth, Thunderlane forced out another sentence//

Note that participial phrases imply concurrent action, so he's grinding his teeth as he speaks. While it's possible to do so, it doesn't seem like that's what you're going for.

>determined to salvage something from this banter//

Over-explaining character motives again. Just like telly language, it's not so much that any single instance of it is a big deal, but that the accumulation of it works against a story's immersion.

>bringing a broader smile to his face//

Watch the repetition. This is the second "smile" in the paragraph, and the fourth one over the last four paragraphs.

>Well, at least I stopped that from going terribly, he thought.

Just something to consider here: since you're using a limited narrator in his perspective, you can just have the narrator state this for him while rephrasing the "I" to third person. It's not necessary to present it as a quoted thought unless you have a need to make sure the reader knows he thought it exactly like this, word for word.

>I just grabbed and didn’t bother checking//

Missing word.

>he had no reason to believe Rumble was lying//

Another character motivation that could stand a less direct approach.

>while Thunderlane thought it annoying at first, he’d come to expect it frequently//

I don't follow the cause/effect here. "At first" implies his attitude changed, but all it says is that he's come to expect it, not that he doesn't find it as annoying anymore.

>turnip slice//

This phrase is starting to get repetitive.

>an unimpressed look//

And what does this look like?

>much to his surprise//

So make the narration sound like he's surprised. That's one of the biggest parts of the toolbox a subjective narrator provides, and you're not using it.

>a surprised grin//

You just said he was surprised.

>A strange expression crossed Rumble’s face, his bored demeanor gone. With a confused look//

All that telly language at once is a bad idea, and what makes the expression strange? It's effectively your narrator who sees it, so he's uniquely qualified to describe what struck him as strange about it, yet I never get to know.

>It was absurdly fascinating to him right then and there that all the eye contact she could ever make was with one of them.//

So make him sound fascinated. Also, she's not always shown with misaligned eyes. They come and go.

>his mentally scrambled for the right answer//

Typo.

>a blush creeping into his cheeks//

Pretty repetitive with how you described her just 2 paragraphs ago.

>he grit his teeth together//

The past tense is "gritted."

>Derpy’s smile widened as she looked at him; his blush flared up again.//

Getting repetitive here as well. It's the fourth "blush" and third "smile" already in this scene.

>They continued to approach the spot Thunderlane had picked out in silence after that.//

A few things here. This is very vague and bland. The preceding few lines of dialogue got a bit talking heads, particularly since Thunderlane's really focused on her reaction to what he's saying, yet all we see her do is a pretty standard nod. You've also used "that" in this way a few times in the chapter, and you can get some leeway for the limited narrator, but it;s weak to use it like this, where it refers to a chunk of narration. It's decidedly non-conversational and breaks immersion. It's a good idea to avoid using demonstratives as pronouns whenever you can.

>wondering if that was the right thing to say//

More over-explained motivation. It's rarely necessary to have a limited narrator explicitly say that the focus character wonders, wants, knows, wishes, hopes, etc. something, because the narrator can just wonder, pine for, declare, wish, or hope it.

>wondering if this was how it felt to be a parent//

Same deal.

>it irritated Thunderlane to no end that this could have been easily avoided in the first place//

I'm not seeing why Thunderlane is so upset about this. It's not like the report is a big deal, and he doesn't suspect Rumble of lying about it.

>there was a lot of words//

Number mismatch.

>he found the first word//

Doesn't seem like that would require much of a search...

>small bottle of champagne//

You just used "small" twice in the sentence. At least those made it clear the repetition was intentional, but this one doesn't.

>an awed expression on her face//

And what does this look like?

>chocolate-chip//

You don't need to hyphenate that.

>He noticed the chocolate in the muffins was already melting//

Just the fact that the narrator-as-Thunderlane mentions it makes it implicit that he noticed it. This kind of language can work if you're pointing out a minute detail to mark it as something most would miss, but this seems like a pretty obvious catch.

At the end of chapter 1, I'll just recap the major issues. There's quite a bit of repetition, more telly language than there really should be, and you're not taking enough advantage of the limited narration to carry the emotion and obviate the need to say what Thunderlane's motivations are. Rumble's coming across as a really irritating character, but it's quite possible you want him to, so that's not necessarily a problem yet.

>that she seemed to enjoy quite a bit//

Better to imply that than say it. And in fact you do a few sentences later, so this is redundant.

>Thunderlane followed the direction she was pointing,//

Third use of "point" in four sentences.

>shock coursed through him//

So show me, or at least have the narrative mood make him seem shocked. I've pointed out this type of telly language enough times now that I think you'll get the picture. I'll only point out additional ones if I'm illustrating some other issue.

>Derpy giggled as she looked up at it and wiggled her hooves//

I'm not sure I get her reaction. She was upset because he didn't see the carrot, and he still doesn't. Basically, he's patronizing her.

>Derpy was much more agile in the air than Thunderlane had expected,//

Doesn't he realize she'd been a contestant in the Best Young Flyer competition?

>Thunderlane eventually found himself staring at Derpy again//

>Trying to force cohesive thoughts again//
Watch that repetitive use of "again."

>“Thunderlane?” she asked, breaking his stare.//

This is already the 7th use of "stare" in the chapter.

>They locked eyes again, repeating their actions from seconds earlier.//

Kind of vague and lacks any punch. I'd imagine a lot of thoughts running through his head, and it's different this time, since he didn't see the first one coming. But you gloss over all that.

>“I barely know anything about you,”//

Why not? He's been hanging out with her. Does she feel like she doesn't know him either? If so, it's pretty premature to kiss him.

>His hoof held up his head as he read, tingling as it fell asleep under his weight.//

Pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the sentence, especially so close together. In addition to feeling repetitive, it muddles the chronology.

>he was met with bitter disappointed//

Typo (as well as telly).

There are more elegant ways of alerting the reader that a scene is a flashback instead of putting it in italics. They work fine for very short passages, but when something goes on as long as this does, it gets irritating to read. Italics make something stand out, and when everything stands out, nothing does.

>“Maybe the ponies at Sugarcube Corner could help me,” he said to himself.//

Why? Because the report mentioned muffins? That's a pretty tenuous connection to make.

>It was the same feeling he had when he was a colt and got a Wonderbolt costume for Nightmare Night; that childish excitement he couldn’t mentally suppress.//

Misused semicolon. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence. Well, technically, it could, but it'd be an odd syntax that I doubt you intended.

>Moon//

Why capitalize that?

>I always wanted a big family//

Then why did she only mention wanting "another"?

>You could come in for a bit and we could, you know, discuss having big families//

So they've only just shared their first kiss, neither one appears to be looking for some quick action, he's admitted he barely knows anything about her... and she's inviting him in to make a younger sibling for Dinky? This'd play fine for a general audience on FiMFiction, but for us, it's a little contrived.

>the pink ball of energy//

He then refers to her as "the mare" the next time, and he never refers to her by name. Surely he knows who she is. Canon heavily implies that the whole town is familiar with her, and she knows them all, too.

>Weather Team meet//

Did you mean "meeting"? This makes it sound like an athletic event.

>he had laid there//

lain

>frowned upon on most of Equestria//

in

>it was common enough in Ponyville//

Really? Seems odd for a rural place to be more liberal or with more of this type of social issue.

>and he had not heard about any deaths recently//

This seems inconsistent with him not really knowing who Pinkie is.

>her speech slurred terribly//

I know; I can see it.

>As he laid back again//

lay

>a strange sense of contentment washed over him//

So describe it. Don't just tell me that's what it is.

>absent-minded//

absentminded

>Besides, it does Dinky good to cry once in a while//

Really? There are better methods for stress relief, and it seems odd for a parent to want their child to cry, particularly in a situation where she's under extreme pressure, and be so flippant about it.

>turning to look forward//

He just caught up to her. Why's he looking backward?

>He snorted and turned away from her.//

There's an awful lot of turning in this scene.

>He looked up, surprised to see genuine sadness in Derpy’s eyes.//

Very telly, and the indentation's off.

>She frowned, and looked like she was on the verge of tears.//

No comma.

Note that there's a big cluster of instances of "look" in this scene.

>his conscious//

conscience

>And you could help us make some muffins.//

She thinks having a complete stranger compliment Dinky will make that much of a difference? And she's going to invite over someone she's known for such a short time?

>the room. He glanced around the room//

Watch that repetition.

>meaning he would have to either work later, or take the day off//

No reason for that comma.

>he noticed the door was wide open//

Especially in a limited narration, you're generally not going to have to say when a character sees, hears, notices, wants, wishes, wonders, thinks, knows, etc. something. It's implicit in the fact that he's describing it as open that he noticed it. It's only worth couching it as noticing when it's an obscure detail most characters would miss.

>With the hallway bathed in light//

You just described the bedroom as bathed in sunlight. It's repetitive.

>to find a decent-sized kitchen with a round wooden table in the center, exactly like it was when he had first come over to make muffins and talk with Dinky//

"To find" generally means it's something new and unexpected, but as he admits, he's seen it before.

>Thunderlane jumped out of his seat.//

You have a number of paragraphs like this that aren't indented.

>She only wailed louder as he spoke.//

This is really over the top. Where emotion is concerned, too much is far worse than not enough.

>one-night-stand//

Only that first hyphen is needed.

>She inhaled deeply before continuing, “he loved to tinker with things.//

Capitalization.

>long,,//

Doubled up on the punctuation there.

There's not a bad storyline, here, but various elements either get short-changed or dropped altogether. The pacing's a bit wonky, too, as this is somewhat of a whirlwind romance, which would imply emotions running exceptionally high, yet a good deal of it is spent in flashbacks which are only tangentially relevant. For instance, the sheer amount of time spent setting up the mixed-up reports wasn't really necessary. Then as important as Dinky's happiness is to Derpy, the thread about her daughter needing a confidence boost never gets resolved. Derpy's feelings about Time Turner, either—there's an explanation of who he was, but then a pretty generic and predictable reaction to it without actually coming to a resolution on the issue. She's not going to be reassured because someone she barely knows said a couple of topical things. It takes time. It feels like this story sets up something else without actually getting to it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 652

>Pinkie let the recipe paper fall to the corner of the kitchen counter where she had found it and went to work.//
This makes it seem less planned and more haphazard. Maybe it wasn't a recipe she'd planned to use beforehand, but even so, wouldn't she be looking it a recipe book for it? The fact that it seemed to just be lying around feels awfully convenient.

>Keeping tabs on the garlic and shallots as they softened while boiling the pasta wasn’t too demanding, but it kept her occupied without any chance for distraction.//

Watch the repetition of "keep."

>enemy She//

Missing period. The "enemy" part needs some backing up, too. It's just words without a mood behind it. What might she think or do to give evidence of how she feels about it?

>often, though she often//

Watch the repetition again.

>Cooking was zen meditation//

Her agonizing over details runs contrary to this. Maybe that's the point, but if she truly believes this, then shouldn't she be at least going through the motions of relaxing and meditating while this is going on?

>something trivial and unimportant would//

Missing some end punctuation here and possibly some words.

>“Twilight!” she called down the stairs just as a fat bubble rose to the surface of the sauce and popped, “dinner time!//

You already gave the first part of the quote end punctuation, so you can't transition back into the quote later on as if it's still part of the same sentence.

>A tired Twilight Sparkle//

So describe her and make her look and act tired. Then you won't need to use the word.

>geras//

That's an awfully obscure word. Inasmuch as the limited narrator is speaking with Pinkie's voice, I don't believe she'd use or even know it.

>crack is really really unhealthy for you//

I have no idea what this is, unless you're making a drug reference, which we don't allow.

>she was able to get them to tolerate each other//

Tree Hugger never seemed to have a problem with Discord, unless you're going to give any hints as to what else might have happened to change that.

>Twilight stared through the plate as Pinkie heaped a mountain of noodles onto two plates//

Repetition of "plates," plus it's unclear where each of them is. I'd imagine Pinkie at the stove doing this, but Twilight's at the table. Did Pinkie carry the sauce over there?

>wonder bread//

Like the Earth trademark? If not, I have no idea what this would mean.

>where it turned ninety degrees mid-air and flung itself beside the baguettes//

Okay, I understand Pinkie trying to introduce some levity to the situation, but this is more over-the-top silliness that doesn't fit the story's mood.

>cheese whiz//

Another odd use of a trade name. Why not just cheese sauce?

>mayo--//

Here's one of the issues with using a double hyphen instead of a dash: on my screen, a line break happened between the hyphens.

>eat with me Twilight//

>Come on buddy//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>Pinkie sighed dismissively//

It's punctuated like a speech attribution, but it's be hard to sigh all that.

>Normally Twilight would have gotten up at this point//

You just had a "normally" sentence a couple paragraphs ago. Now, I think this could be effective, but I don't believe it was deliberate. If you keep chiming in with one of these "normally" phrasings every other paragraph, I think it could be a chilling use of thematic repetition. But as it is now, it just feels like an oversight.

>like the hinged portal to ,//

To what?

>and when she didn’t flinch away//

Needs a comma here to finish the dependent clause.

>Pinkie thought back//

Repetitive with the use of "back" in the previous sentence.

>she hoped//

By now, I'm seeing a lot of use of this word. It's been okay, but this one stood out. Here's why: in a limited narration like you're using, it's understood that the narrator is speaking for the character. So instead of having him tell me that Pinkie hoped something, just have him hope it, and it's implicit that it reflects her thoughts. Something like "maybe this one would pass the test" does that a little less bluntly.

>Warily//

How does this look? There are a lot of things she could do that would qualify, but by not describing any of them, you're making me come up with her actions for you. Show me what she does.

>”That counts,”//

Your smart quotes broke here. The opening ones are backward.

>I’m sorry Pinkie.//

Needs a comma.

>Pinkie sighed with content.//

"Content" isn't a noun, at least not in the sense you mean. Even so, it's a pretty telly description. The sigh already gets at contentment, though you could get at it a little more with some body language or a facial expression. You rarely need an "in/with/of emotion" statement.

>pulling a sigh from Pinkie’s lips//

She just sighed. It's an action many authors overuse.

>with two split sections of her tail//

Again, a comedic visual effect that doesn't fit the story's tone.

>now empty cooking ware//

now-empty cookware

>souflé//

soufflé

>cookingware//

cookware. This occurs a couple times.

>dogeared//

dog-eared

This is a wonderful picture of a sickly relationship. Pinkie comes across as very sympathetic here, but I have to admit at coming out of it feeling unsatisfied. There are times that vagueness and open-endedness work, but I have so little context as to what is actually wrong with her that there are huge differences in the emotional stake I'm likely to have. Pinkie's possibly a little at fault here, but it's more the other side, whether Twilight's a victim as well or someone who's living in a hell of her own making.

I toyed with the possibility that they're shut up in the castle in a situation similar to being in a bomb shelter after a nuclear attack, and maybe Twilight got caught in the fallout or while researching a way to counteract it. Then maybe Pinkie's making up all this stuff about seeing their friends and getting food from them. But there's nothing in the story to directly indicate that. So now I can't tell whether Twilight's just being a neglectful lover. It's possible she's forgoing life because she's so focused on what she's doing in the basement. Maybe she's genuinely sick through no fault of her own. But in any case, if she really loves Pinkie, why the constant withdrawal from her? Maybe she doesn't want to be seen like that (which is unsupported by anything in the story, even if it's plausible), maybe she doesn't love Pinkie anymore, maybe she's genuinely convinced that what she's doing in the basement is for the greater good. As much as she's supposed to be about friendship, this abandonment with no explanation just doesn't fit with her, unless there's something to connect the dots back to canon her. Basically, a lot of the situation's pathos comes from what agency Twilight has in all this, and there's really no help on that front. For what it's worth, I think it would add a lot of depth to the story to have that piece, or at least sufficient clues to it.

When you're ready to resubmit, please choose the "back from Mars" option.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 658

I'll just compile a list of the mechanical issues I see in chapter one, so you know the kinds of things I'm looking for.

>who stood across from her//

The dependent clause needs a comma.

>folded yet another piece of clothing. She levitated the folded//

I believe I pointed this out last time. You want to avoid repeating all except the most mundane words in this close a space, unless the repetition is fr a deliberate effect. The second instance here is wholly unnecessary.

>Rarity smiled a little more and she couldn’t keep//

Another spot where it needs a comma between the clauses.

>meow//

Why italicize this? It's a perfectly valid word, and you're not emphasizing it.

>month- far//

That should be a dash.

>to –” she blushed slightly, but when she spoke her voice was slightly boisterous and carried a bit of a strange accent, “—to//

You're mixing types of dashes, and don't put a comma on the end of an aside.

>royalty! AGAIN!//

When an exclamation mark or question mark is on an italicized word, it's normally italicized as well.

>takin’- shoot//

Should be a dash.

>“Not that I don’t think y’all couldn’t have packed just a bit lighter,” she muttered, but Rarity didn’t hear her.//

You're using a limited narrator in Rarity's perspective. If Rarity can't hear it, neither can the narrator.

>“I meant–,” She pointed to each of the mares in the room as she spoke//

Don't use a comma with a dash, and you have a mismatch of punctuation and capitalization there.

>Pinkie is –,//

No comma.

>The party pony looked up from her hat-mountain and Rainbow sighed again.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Pegasus//

Don't capitalize this if you;re not going to capitalize the other races.

>what Applejack had said finally sank in and she turned to give the earth pony a narrow-eyed glare//

Here's one of the issues with LUS: there are two earth ponies present, so this isn't specific enough.

>quickly-gathering//

Don't use hyphens in two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb.

>...of course not, Twi//

Unless it's completing a sentence earlier left suspended, capitalize lead-ins like this.

>grandiosely-dressed//

No hyphen needed.

>because if there was one thing that Rarity prided herself on//

>because if there was one thing that nobility, politicians, actresses, singers, and producers all liked to do//
These are consecutive sentences. See the repetition? And see the inconsistent use of commas?

>If she took on any more clients before she was finished with some of these orders//

Needs a comma after this.

>drawing the unicorn’s attention//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with commas.

>Carousel Boutique!” She said//

Capitalization.

>Silence greeted her words and it stretched on for so long that she had almost convinced herself that she’d been hearing things//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>her front hooves crossed demurely before her//

Absolute phrases will also typically be set off with a comma.

>a city most famous for its unicorn population//

Appositives also get commas on both ends.

>Her violet eyes//

You just gave their color in the previous paragraph.

>she paused a moment, as if she were tasting the words before she said them.//

Capitalization.

>She thought as she suppressed a sigh.//

Capitalization again.

>and when she spoke//

This dependent clause needs commas on both ends.

>her purple eyes went to the ponyquins at the front window and when she turned back Rarity was surprised to see a touch of temerity in their amethyst depths,//

Don't end an aside with a comma.

>her blue eyes locked on the other mare and to her horror she felt her cheeks begin to heat slightly with the fires of embarrassment//

>The mare watched her closely for a moment and Rarity had to fight to remain still beneath her penetrating gaze.//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>She heard the mare behind her exhale loudly and when she spoke it was easy to hear the smile in her words.//

Needs multiple commas between the clauses.

>and when she brought her eyes back to Rarity’s//

Needs a comma, or else it parses as "Rarity's relief."

>begin!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

So those are the technical things. There aren't that many, though they tend to be persistent. The biggest issue is still the telly language. I might have missed a couple, but here's a pretty exhaustive list of all such phrasings I found in chapter 1:

>looking extremely pleased with herself//

>the excitement and pride from bubbling up into her voice//
>her voice was slightly boisterous//
>clearly not sure if Rarity’s giggling was amused or condescending//
>look like she’d regretted//
>The excitement was starting to well up in her again, mixing with the anticipation and worry//
>a caring smile//
>sighed in vexation//
>looked incredibly smug//
>She felt a nagging emptiness//
>Rarity sighed in a pleasant mixture of exhaustion and satisfaction//
>a subtle tinge of surprise//
>Rarity felt pride well up in her chest//
>a gesture that she knew very well implied a great deal of self-importance//
>She sighed in a vaguely dramatic fashion.//
>Rarity’s face remained friendly//
>managing to look affronted rather than embarrassed//
>relief and happiness//

Look how often you directly inform the reader of how a character feels. Actor's don't do this. They make their behavior and appearance such that you'll conclude how he feels through observing him. We naturally read each other that way, so it creates a more realistic experience, plus it forces the reader into the character's perspective, which connects them better. Try to communicate more through facial expression, posture, body language, and reactions than providing a ready-made conclusion to the reader. Red flags for telling include using outright emotions as nouns (happiness), adjectives (sad), adverbs (excitedly), and prepositional phrases (in confusion). Here's an example of a time you did it right:

>Rarity returned her smile, but suddenly felt the tiny pricks of tears in her eyes. She tried to clear her throat, but found it tight as she wiped a hoof delicately at her eyelashes.//


You never directly identify any of her emotions, but they're easily apparent from her behavior. This is how it's supposed to work.

I'm not sure my previous point about LUS was completely understood. Like telly language, some here and there isn't bad. My problem was the specific instances where they describe Rarity. Because of the limited narrator you're using, the narration is implied to be a look at Rarity's train of thought, and it's odd to have her think about herself as "the unicorn." It's a very external viewpoint generally unsupported by that narrative voice. Names and pronouns are closer to how people typically think about themselves. You don't think of yourself as "the blond" (or brunette or whatever) when you've got a running train of thought, or "the male" or "the white guy." It'd be strange to do so and very situation-dependent, like when that's the characteristic that stands out as unusual.

That said, I asked for a second opinion, and another pre-reader said he found that the story oscillated between Rarity feeling more distant and more open, and the use of LUS to describe herself might mirror that effect. I'd think that if that were the case, you would have explained it as such, not as a matter of flow (which wasn't the issue, anyway). I'd also think that if that were the effect, the LUS usage would correspond to times when she seemed unsure of herself and detached from the situation. I can't scan the entire story to see if that is so, but the usage in chapter 1 wasn't consistent according to this theory. It looks more like you lucked into something that could work with some tweaks than incorporated it by design. That's what a stylistic choice is, after all, so citing that without an explanation of what it's doing and why it works doesn't really go anywhere. So I'd say it's worth cleaning up the instances of LUS that refer to Rarity specifically or taking care to align their use with her mood. That's secondary, though—the telly language is the real problem, and if you can get that under control, the rest isn't worth so much quibbling about. So I'm sending this back to Mars.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 660

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>’Tis well of thou//

It's the object of a preposition, so "thee."

>But, princess//

As a term of address, a title would be capitalized. There are multiple instances later on.

>Thine eyes art//

The plural is just like the modern one: thine eyes are.

>worried the dark magic she had conjured had created the monster//

Don't over-explain character motivations like this. Find a way to imply it instead through her actions or the tone of the narration.

>blood red//

In most cases where you use a multi-word phrase as a single descriptor, you need to hyphenate it.

>Misty cried out in shock, writhing against the creature’s razor grasp.//

Through the encounter with the gargoyle, we get precious little evidence of how Misty feels about it. You're taking a limited narration, so the narrator himself carries some of Misty's mood. When he sounds so factual about things, it lends the feel that Misty isn't very affected by it.

>close-combat//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>Panic and anger warred inside her///

Now we do get some emotion, but this is very telly. Show me her panic and anger without ever actually using the words. Think of how an actor get you to believe his character is angry. He doesn't just say he is, if he even does that. He takes the actions and appearance of someone who's angry. This is how we read each other anyway, some it comes across as much more natural. Even that split second of interpreting flailing arms, a raised voice, and a red face as anger makes you see that character's behavior through your own experience. Thus, you identify with the character better. Red flags include directly stating the emotion as noun (sadness), adjective (angry), adverb (happily), and prepositional phrase (in excitement).

>crack!//

We prefer not to use sound effects in narration. Since this is a valid word anyway, that would only involve removing the italics and exclamation mark.

>Adrenaline coursed through her//

That's a pretty bland fact. There's no apparent effect on her. How does it make her feel, both emotionally and physically?

>allow her passage. Once she lightly settled upon the forest floor, she allowed//

Watch the close repetition of words like this.

>The first was silken and soothing; the second, confused, but curious.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but the second one here wouldn't be.

>in disbelief and horror//

Another spot of telly language. It's okay to have a few of these in a story, but they're best confined to unimportant moments when the emotional stakes are low. I'm not going to mark many of these, just enough to give you a sampling of what to look for.

>about what//

about which

>trying to make the earth pony understand//

Another spot where you over-explain her motivation.

>The earth pony blinked in confusion.//

Another telly phrasing.

>demanded she//

I don't see the advantage of reversing the normal syntax here. It just sounds weird and out of place with how the rest of the story is written.

>the earth pony reeled in bewilderment, eyes flashing every which way.//

The way you left that lower case suggests you're trying to use it as a speech attribution, but it contains no speaking action.

>but I must say that I’m still quite confused as to what is going on. Are we very far from where we were?//

Given that this mare so recently thought she was dead and responsible for several deaths, she sounds awfully calm.

>Despite her perplexity, the earth pony’s ears pricked taut, curiosity piqued.//

Very telly.

>Satisfied that they were neither being watched nor in immediate danger//

So she indulged in the preceding irrelevant conversation while still worried that there might be danger nearby?

>Lyric was unperturbed//

Watch the perspective. As written, the narrator, effectively Misty, is reading Lyric's mind. Either present it as something Misty can see or couch it as her opinion.

>Lyric seemed delighted by the sight of it//

How so?

>Balefire was a mighty reckoning and not to be used lightly.//

You go on about this awfully long, and in the middle of a fight isn't really a good place for a lengthy aside. It disrupts the fast pacing of the action.

>she knew this was no ordinary nightmare of his subconscious creation//

Given that you're using a close limited narration, it's already implicit that the narrator can only say things Luna knows. I'd recommend cutting "she knew" entirely.

>This was the fall of Gallifrey.//

You kind of gloss over exactly how familiar she is with him and his memories that she knows what Gallifrey is and can immediately identify the memory.

>his ire disintegrating visibly//

I haven't been keeping up with pointing out telly language, but I wanted to here, since it has an additional problem. You've transitioned into the Doctor's perspective here, but why is he making this judgment? If he's that detached from his ire that he can comment on how he appears instead of the raw emotional cues themselves, chances are it's not that intense. And how can he see what he looks like anyway?

>looking very much like a tired, old pony//

Same deal. This could be Luna's judgment, but the last time you made any limited statements, they'd been in the Doctor's viewpoint. If you meant to keep it with Luna all along, then that's an additional problem, because it doesn't stay there.

>once…!//

The combination of an ellipsis and an exclamation mark is the one that doesn't quite work. How do you trail off emphatically? You do this a number of times.

The mood change here is pretty off-putting. I guess the crossover tag and Doctor Whooves character tag should have clued me in, but the main things people look at (title & synopsis) don't indicate at all that this is going to be a Doctor Who crossover.

But back to the mood. The story so far has been very dark, serious, and foreboding, but here, it suddenly gets silly. I'll grant that Doctor Who does that sometimes, but a) it never takes itself that seriously and b) you can't assume the reader will know anything about Doctor Who. So it's just jolting to get this sudden shift to comedy-ish adventure from something fairly dark. There are ways mood shifts can work, but it doesn't feel like it's serving some other purpose here.

>The Doctor may rattle on like a madpony at times, but his intellect was far beyond even that of Star Swirl the Bearded.//

And now you're definitely back in Luna's perspective. The point of view is wavering a lot since the Doctor's introduction.

>Never—” The Doctor grinned broadly at the Never monsters, making a few errant roots and branches shrink back uncertainly. “—it’s//

An aside breaking a quote like that doesn't get capitalized (unless the first word is one that has to be capitalized anyway) or take a period as end punctuation. It can take a question mark or exclamation mark, but otherwise, it gets nothing.

>the offense raucous//

That is a really weird syntax.

>his strange bauble//

So she knows who and what he is, she's pretty familiar with him, she knows what Gallifrey is... and she can't call this thing by name?

>Misty Moonrise had no complaints//

Only two paragraphs into this scene, and you've adopted a different perspective in each.

>glad that Lyric seemed to have overcome the fear that would have overwhelmed most ponies upon facing their worst nightmares//

Really over-explaining an attitude again.

>terrible, grating rumble thundered. Hollow eyes of crimson glared from a gaunt, scarred face that rested upon an arching, serpentine neck. //

Watch that you don't fall into structural ruts. That's a pretty short space to have three sets of coordinate adjectives.

I was unclear as to when this was taking place. But it's after Tirek, so why does Misty have to go through such a detailed description of Discord? It's unnecessary for the reader's benefit, so would indicate something unfamiliar to Misty, but surely she knows who he is. And a little later we fin that she does. So this is completely extraneous.

>defied Princess Celestia//

This kind of grammatical conundrum can turn up if you get too fancy with your speaking verbs. "Defied" here must take the speech as it's direct object, but that doesn't fit with its meaning. Its direct object should be the thing being defied, not the words that do so. You've got other ones with the same problem, like "rebuked" and "chastised."

>P-P-Please//

Only capitalize the first one unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

>we—” A train conductor’s cap materialized on Discord’s head and a pocket watch appeared in his talons. “—catch//

Same deal as before with the aside. I'll leave the rest for you to spot.

>Misty’s tears redoubled as his stolen magic surrounded her, lifting her to eye level as he opened his mouth and inhaled.//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in a single sentence, and coupled with the participle, there's a lot of synchronization going on.

>Stunned speechless by the sheer hatred in Misty’s voice, Lyric could only stare at her.//

Now you're back to Lyric's perspective.

>What if I was the one on the hill?//

>What if it was Princess Luna?//
Since she's speaking hypothetically, use subjunctive mood: What if I were the one on the hill?

>adumbral//

The more unusual a word is, the more noticeable when it's repeated. And a reader's definitely going to remember seeing this one before. It's the kind that you can probably only get away with once per chapter.

I realize you've got Discord in an unusual situation here, but he sounds so generic. I guess it can be hard to imagine how he might talk if genuinely afraid, but this doesn't have him as distinctive at all.

>Hoping whatever had prevented them from interfering before had dissipated now//

Hoping is the same as knowing, and for that matter, other things like wanting, wishing, wondering. It's implicit in a limited narration that it's attributable to the perspective character, so just have the narrator hope this instead of informing me Luna did (provided you keep the perspective consistent and identifiable).

First, you have a nice writing style that flows easily, if a little on the purple side at times. It does have some consistent mechanical problems, which I've noted, and it frequently has telly language and wavering perspective. Those two will be the toughest to fix, as they require pretty extensive rephrasing.

On the character side, I can't say I have any complaints, except that Discord's voice really doesn't sound like him.

For plot, the biggest issue I had was with Doctor Whooves. You haven't made any obvious references to this being a Whooves story, yet you've labeled it a crossover. I can't see why you included him in the story at all. He doesn't do anything other than give Luna something to do. He doesn't drive the plot in any way, he spouts a little advice that other characters could easily give, he's got some problems with how he relates to Luna, and he's all but completely extraneous to the story. Plus the strange mood shift is entirely attributable to him.

Here's where you'll wonder why I spent all that time compiling feedback: we can't post this story anyway, at least not yet. It's listed as a sequel, and Seth's policy on those is that the original story must be accepted first, then the sequel can be added in a story updates post. So if you want to work on this story and resubmit, you'll first need to get "The Darkest Night" passed.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 664

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She wished//

You're adopting a very limited narrator, so it's not necessary to identify Peachy as wishing, wanting, knowing, hoping, etc. things. It's implicit that she does if the narrator does. Do if the narrator says something like "if only she could go back to sleep," it communicates that more directly.

>Oat flakes were not her favourite.//

Seems like adding emphasis on "not" would add a little life to this.

>well? Oh well//

Try to avoid repeating words that close together.

>addressing Peachy's mother again//

That's pretty obvious.

>excited to see her best friend//

Don't tell me she's excited. Make her act and look excited.

>"Bye, dear!" Her mother's voice came floating over Peachy's shoulder.//

"Came" makes for a mediocre speaking verb, but it appears you did mean it as one, even though you haven't capitalized this like a speech attribution.

>Sunny Daze, almost bounced up the stairs.//

Why is that comma there?

>instantly appearing less full of the joys of spring//

And what does this look like? I like the imagery here, but work it into a description instead of having it be a telly way of drawing a conclusion for the reader.

>I'm fed up of//

Is that a Britishism? I've only ever heard "fed up with."

>Sunny's eyes were wide with surprise.//

Telly again. These prepositional phrases are almost always redundant with an action that already gives ample clues to the emotion being depicted, as does the wide eyes here.

>a look of expectation//

I'm not pointing out all of these but just enough examples to give you an idea of what to look for. The most commons ones are bluntly using an emotion as an adjective (sad), adverb (happily), or prepositional phrase (in excitement).

>She reasoned that they were both very responsible fillies for their age.//

Why are you jumping into the mother's perspective? If this is merely Sunny's interpretation of what's happening, then say so. As written, the narrator's either gone over to the mother's head, or Sunny's reading her mother's mind.

>And Ponyville was the kind of place where nothing bad or dangerous ever happened.//

Despite the mountain of evidence...

>Peachy looked confused.//

Besides being telly, this is in conflict with the perspective. Your narrator's in Peachy's head, so how does she know what her expression looks like?

>She held back her hoof: if Peachy wasn't interested, there would be no point in knocking.//

And now you're in Sunny's head. The perspective is jumping around all over the place here. It's been with Peachy, Sunny, and Sunny's mother, all in a single page.

>he was sat in front of.//

While a valid syntax, it means someone else placed him there. I don't think that's what you intended.

>OK//

Spell it out as "okay."

>The two ponies decided to take a break from their hunt and walked around the pond.//

This paragraph passes by so quickly that it's almost trite. If it's worth doing, it's worth giving it a little more meaning. Show them doing a couple of these things and give the moment s nice slice-of-life feel. It'd make the tension ease, only to build it up again in the next scene, so it would still serve a purpose. As it is, you could cut it without harming anything.

>Peachy tried to picture what her special somepony might look like, but her mind drew a blank.//

So let me see a little of what she tries to come up with. It'll get me to identify with her character better.

>Her back legs were still on solid ground, but her front legs were suspended in mid air. Suspended by Sunny who had caught her tail in her teeth just in time.//

This all feels very mechanical. It just sticks to facts, but with the limited narrator you're using, let it carry how she feels about it, too. Wouldn't this scare her? But we don't get the reaction until later. It'd be very immediate. Let the wording and rhythm of the narration carry her mood.

The open ending is fine, but I am left wondering whether there's actually any meeting of the minds here. Sunny certainly fits all of Peachy's criteria, and Peachy seems to realize that, but there's also no indication that she might do anything about it. Sunny also seems to realize it, but she downplays that, and it's unclear whether that means she doesn't think Peachy would ever act on it or whether Sunny wouldn't be receptive.

Let me try to explain it better. The trick with an open ending is to attach an emotional investment to as many of the possible outcomes, at least the obvious ones. So here's what I see as possibly happening and why the story doesn't give each any weight.

1. Peachy and Sunny get together. Neither one seems inclined to make this happen, so it doesn't build up a goal that can be a source of conflict. Sunny in particular doesn't seem to care much either way, so there's no indication she has a personal stake in it.
2. They don't get together because Peachy doesn't make a move. There's no evidence that Peachy has even thought of this, so there's no emotional investment from her in the outcome.
3. They don't get together because Sunny is missing signs or is opposed to the idea. The former is unlikely because of the very self-aware way Sunny downplays it, and she doesn't seem disappointed by doing so. The latter is a possibility, though her wording of it doesn't support this.
4. Peachy's decided she doesn't need or want a special somepony. This seems like the kind of thing she'd have said outright, and while she does say she's not sad about it, it also doesn't say that her happiness results from coming to that understanding any more than just enjoying the diversion from it.

Most conflict arises from goals. So I think it would help if you clearly determined for yourself some of the basic questions that stories answer about that: What does Peachy Pie want? (This can change over the course of the story. Bonus points if she wants multiple things, especially if they're mutually exclusive.) What is she willing to do or sacrifice to get it? What bad thing will happen if she doesn't achieve it? Then ask the same questions about Sunny. The story doesn't have to contain all the answers, particularly for the one I very deliberately haven't asked: What is the outcome? But the ones I did ask are pretty important, and the ones about what they'd give up to achieve their goals and what failure to do so means are the ones that would add some tension heft to the open ending. And how open is up to you. It's perfectly valid to present multiple paths and leave it at that or hint that one or two are the most likely.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 670

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Twilight Sparkle was panicking.//

And yet paragraph after paragraph has her acting nothing like panicked.

>From her vantage point in the foothills of the Crystal Mountains, //

This sure makes it sound like she's in an overlook or a castle or something. It's not until a little later you say she's on a train. You ought to establish the setting more quickly.

>the train hit a larger-than normal bump//

What's a normal bump even? Aside from the very small expansion joints between rail segments, trains don't really hit bumps.

>suffused throughout//

The "throughout" is redundant, plus it leaves the transitive verb without a direct object. You use the phrase again in the next chapter.

>poorly-hidden//

When the first word is an -ly adverb, you generally don't hyphenate the phrase.

>she would be so selfish as to turn away just because the affection made her uncomfortable//

I'd think Twilight would be smart enough to diagnose this as a form of Florence Nightingale Syndrome.

>Tan plaster//

That would seem to be a poor choice of material in a train car, where there's lots of vibration.

>rubbing her nuzzle//

I assume you meant "muzzle."

>“Sorry!” Twilight apologized once more, “I just want to go to the caboose – I, uh, need to stretch my wings, they’ve gotten sore on the ride,” Twilight lied.//

You have two attributions for the same quote.

>to get help understanding how she felt//

So why is she referring to them as a couple?

>While she was genuinely interested, she spoke primarily because the silence had stretched uncomfortably long.//

There are a few spots like this where you're awfully blunt at spelling out a character's motivation. These things usually work better through implication.

>a slight blush of embarrassment//

I'm starting to see more of this, too. Avoid being blunt with emotions as well. The blush itself already hints at embarrassment, and you could add a little body language if you like, but the "of embarrassment" is what we call "telly" language. Think of how an actor gets you to think his character is sad. He doesn't just say he is. He implies it through how he acts and looks. Just give me the facts, not the conclusions.

>If there was a problem I would have said something. It just sounded nice and I was curious//

There are a few spots like this where you need a comma to separate clauses.

>Go get some rest, dawn isn’t too far off.//

You have a number of comma splices like this, too, especially in dialogue.

>It was a small room, and cozy; no larger than it had to be.//

Misused semicolon. What comes after it couldn't stand as a separate sentence.

>She procured a sugar bowl with telekinesis as spooned some of the fine powder into her mug.//

Missing word, and "procured" is an odd word choice here.

>then trailed off//

It's unnecessary to tell me she trailed off when I can already see it from the punctuation.

>compassion,” she sighed.//

She sighed ten sentences? That's awfully difficult. Try it. This is why "sigh" is a poor choice of speaking verb for all but the shortest of passages.

>I’ve just scared of such a huge change//

I'm

>few hour’s worth//

few hours’ worth

>Loathe as she was//

"Loathe" is a verb. The adjective is "loath."

>comfortable position, making herself as comfortable//

There are some places where you repeat a word in a close space like this.

>thank thank you//

Extraneous word.

>When she slept, she lowered the barriers she had attempted to erect around herself all her life, keeping all sympathetic contact at a safe distance.//

At times, the narration wanders into things like this that appear to be from Sunset's perspective. How would Twilight know this?

At the end of chapter 1, something that stands out to me is the sheer number of "to be" verbs. These are inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what simply is. You should be choosing more active verbs. Of the easier forms to search for, I counted 168. That's really a lot for this word count. It's more than one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen.

On to chapter 2.

>Her half-asleep mind floundered for a second//

Pronouns work by antecedent, so it's usually off-putting to have a character's first mention in a scene be via one. I have no idea which character this refers to until a couple of sentences later.

>Dusty beams of light floated through the window, gilding everything it fell upon.//

It's odd syntax for "it" to refer to "light" here. It's more natural to use a pronoun for "beams," which would then be "they."

>but the cold had been bothering her less recently//

Then why did she immediately regret getting out of bed and feeling cold?

>Ponyville looked exactly like what it was; a town well and truly awake in the late morning light.//

Misused semicolon again. Here, you're providing a definition or clarification, so a colon would be appropriate.

>destination- a//

You'd been correctly using dashes in chapter 1.

>It proclaimed itself as the Carousel Boutique//

Odd for a narrator who's following Twilight around to say it this way, since Twilight would be very familiar with it already.

>The space should have felt like impersonal//

Extraneous word.

>All those gems. Truly, truly, truly outrageous.//

References like that tend to undercut the serious tone you've been taking through the story. Groaning isn't exactly the reaction you want in the middle of a romance.

>Anyway, the story; Sunset was going to arrive//

Another misused semicolon.

I was hoping chapter 2 would fill in some of the back story, but it hasn't. There's a common problem with shipping stories, where the reader is just asked to accept the couple without justification. There are times that isn't actually necessary, when we're seeing the couple long after the relationship is established and those growing pains aren't the source of the conflict. But here, I have very little idea how these two got together. There's a very short and vague history behind how we get from "Twilight leaves Sunset in a crater" and "Twilight and Sunset are in love." It leaves the whole thing feeling superficial, as you're not establishing a reason for the reader to become invested, unless it's just someone who already brings that to the table because they're a fan of shipping in general or this couple in particular.

You do a quick, after-the-fact narration of how they initially became involved, but it's much more powerful, when that's the point of the story, to see it as it happens. When the reader understands the relationship and sees it develop, he's a lot more invested in it. The characters, too—for Twilight's part, at least she says the right things to get her feelings across, but it's all in the dialogue and the few internal thoughts we get. There's not much in her behavior to sell me on how she feels, and the same is true for Sunset as well. There are a lot of tools out there for relaying emotion, but you're almost exclusively leaning on dialogue. Partly, this will be alleviated by working on the instances of telly language.

It's possible you deal with the early stages of this relationship in the prequel, but if that's the case, I wouldn't call it nonessential reading. We do have a policy at EqD that to post a sequel, the original story must already be on the blog. While that may become an issue anyway, I'd say it absolutely is one if that story shows how these characters come to have an interest in each other in the first place.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 671

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>A snail, a sloth, a salamander; so long as it's his speed.//
Misused semicolon, as there aren't independent clauses anywhere on either side.

Story:
>The noise around the pond never caused her to stir.//
There are times it can work, especially when you're deliberately trying to conceal a character's identity, but that's not what you're doing here, since you already identify Fluttershy as the main character in the synopsis, so I don't get why it's happening here—pronouns work by antecedent, so it's weak to have your first reference to a character be by one. Even something like "the pegasus" is better, which you do get to at the end of the first paragraph. But again, you're not trying to conceal who this is, so I don't see the point. Here are your references to the character by paragraph:

1. her, she, her, she, her, the mare
2. the mare, her, her
3. her, she, she, her, she, she, her
4.
5. the pegasus, her, the pony, their
6. the pegasus
7. she, her, she
8. she, her, her, she
9.
Well, it goes on like this. You don't give her name until the 18th paragraph. Why not?

Another issue is telly language, where you use blunt terms to convey emotion instead of getting me to infer it from the character's behavior and appearance. It's much more engaging when I read about a character hanging his head, rubbing at his red eyes, and losing his temper quickly, then having to place myself in his shoes and decide he's sad instead of just having the narrator tell me he's sad. Red flags include using the emotion/attitude itself as a isolated noun (sadness), adjective (happy), adverb (excitedly), or prepositional phrase (in confusion).

Here are a few examples:
panicked
in fright
frightened
in fear
in understanding
in affection and in an attempt to regain her personal space (the latter one here is one I hadn't discussed, but also beware of over-explaining characters' motivations)
happily
in remembrance
a shocked expression
agonizingly (also an odd word choice, as it seems to take on a perspective, but which one, I can't tell)

In these, you're making me come up with the visual. It should work the other way: you provide the visual and let me decide what it means.

>inhale//

That's not a noun.

>Hello everyone//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>welc- Oh!//

Please use a proper dash for interruptions, asides, and cutoffs, and you generally aren't going to capitalize after it.

>The birds flew away but Winona poked her nose beneath the feathers and sniffed wildly.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>You can make friends with whoever you like, okay?//

Technically, "whomever," but it's your call as to whether you think Fluttershy would know that.

>all-right//

all right or alright

>‘emselves//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in from somewhere else or type two and delete the first.

>but-.//

Again, use a proper dash, and the only end punctuation you'd use after one is an exclamation mark or question mark, if appropriate.

>and was being vigorously licked by the wired Winona//

Passive voice is worth avoiding in general, unless you've really given thought as to how it changes the emphasis. I don't see the advantage of it here.

>‘er//

Same deal with the apostrophe. You'll just have to scan for these. I won't mark any more.

>encircled//

You're not quite using that word right.

>H-…//

You're not going to use both of those punctuation marks in conjunction, since they mean mutually exclusive things.

>“Uh… no?” She replied.//

Capitalization

I'm wondering what the point of the interaction with Applejack was. In fact, for a while, I was wondering what the point of the whole story was, but it did come together at the end, if a little weakly. But what happened with Applejack didn't lead toward that conclusion. If you removed it, the story wouldn't suffer. It's not necessary for a scene to be integral to the plot, of course, if it accomplishes something else, like world building, establishing characterization, setting a mood, creating scenery... but I still don't see any of that happening here. Make that part of the story mean something.

So back to the conclusion you do have. There's a setup here and some back story to show that Tank and Dash had a prior interaction. But stories are about conflict and change. There's not any conflict here, but it's not strictly necessary. So what changed? If I look at the characters or the world before and after the story, what about the story has caused a change? Fluttershy has a slightly changed opinion of Tank, and behind the scenes, we have a bigger history of how he came to live with Fluttershy, but there's not a larger point being made. What message do you want the reader to come away with? The immediately obvious one is that Fluttershy underestimated Tank along with everyone else, and she comes to some revelation about that, which she kind of does, but it's so understated as to be easy to overlook.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 683

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>one thousand and thirteen//

It's improper to use "and" as part of a number, except just before fractions. It could still fit with a character's voice, since real people do say it like this, but as formally and analytically as she's speaking, I doubt she would.

>“eyes”//

Not sure why she's qualifying that with quotes. They really are her eyes.

>a facial expression suggesting joy//

>He appeared somewhat disheartened//
>could easily sense his underlying frustration//
I'm of a mixed mind about this. Her perception of emotion could be different from ours, and the bluntness does evoke a certain childlike quality... but then her perception isn't different from ours, is it? She's still reading the same cues, like facial expression, that we do. She lacks the experience to contextualize it, but she identifies it just as readily. All this is to say that she still has to interpret the facial expression, as it's explicitly saying that she does, so why not let me see the evidence she's observing rather than the conclusion she draws from it? I'm willing to give you some leeway here to see whether you gradually change this as she matures or don't go overboard with it.

>followed him around the Home first several days of my operation//

Missing word.

>father-figure//

No need to hyphenate that.

>a fact my logic sub-processors were quick to calculate//

Not an appropriate use of a semicolon—what comes after it couldn't stand as an independent sentence.

>“Ponyville.”//

You'd been placing those periods outside these types of air quotes. Inside is more standard, but whatever you choose, be consistent.

>I waited because I told to wait.//

Missing word.

>I could not predict when you would come back.//

I have no indication of how long she's been doing this before he asks her. Unless his work schedule is very erratic, she could at least narrow it down. Sure, she might not know if he'll return at 5:13 or 5:21, but she can be reasonably sure he won't get home at least until after 4:30 and do something else until then.

>Mane, a deep purple; showing heavy usage of gel and spray, I could detect.//

Another misused semicolon. It's tough to get away with these, since the use of a semicolon at all suggests a formalism that doesn't play well with dodging the rules of their usage.

>It was then, that my traitorous brain did something that they had never done before: question.//

There's no reason to have a comma there, and there's a number mismatch: brain/they.

>he was genuinely surprised//

Alright, the leeway is quickly running out. She's been around long enough that such a thing as surprise should be familiar to her. She should be able to talk about it in terms of her observations, since she should understand a direct causal link by now.

>“But what about your “directive”?”//

When you have sets of quotes nested inside others, alternate between single and double quotes.

>It was then, that his perplexity became shock.//

Another unneeded comma, and another spot where the telly language isn't backed up by the naivete that worked for it earlier.

>father-figure//

No hyphen.

>Father was not displeased; the opposite, as a point of fact//

Misused semicolon.

>A “hug”, as my databank helpfully informed.//

I don't see the difference in knowing what an embrace is, yet having to air-quote "hug."

>; all for the point of showing my capacity for “independence.”//

Another misused semicolon.

>sense...!//

That's one punctuation combo that's pretty mutually exclusive.

>I felt “concerned” for him, and “worried”//

It's getting really old to have all these quoted, and I'm finally figuring out why: she's not saying how they make her feel. She's only using the word, not how it relates to her. She's presumably going off a definition of the word as her only understanding and matching her characteristics to it, but we don't get to see that piece of the puzzle. It's a shorthand way of telling me she's naive about it, but when I don't get to see that in practice, it remains just a word on the page and not a connection I have with the character. It'd be much more engaging to watch her try to figure out and justify that she's actually experiencing these emotions. You do that with a few things, like her method of determining that being rebellious satisfies her directives. For the rest of it, you're asking me to invent her internal struggles for you.

>I felt alone, afraid, and lost.//

And now that she's finally stopped air-quoting all this, how does it feel to her? Even if you swore up and down that the telly language was a "stylistic choice" that mirrored her own distance from her emotion, here is where the rubber meets the road, and it's no more real.

>But, it's okay now//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>refuse! But I refused//

I can't tell if that repetition is deliberate wordplay, but if so, it's coming across as comical.

>I was far from the town of ponies by the time I slowed my pace, and finally allowed my ventilation system to operate efficiently.//

>It was several days before I reached the mountains, and the snowfields that lay behind them.//
That's all one clause. No need for the comma.

>locked-up//

No hyphen. This is a verb, not a descriptor.

So, the plot was good. I just can't get over the bluntness of the emotional language, though. I'll allow that at the beginning, it reflects that she's processing emotion almost on a subconscious level, so she's not actively aware of the cues she's reading. But as she gains familiarity with it, I think that'd change. By the end of the story, she is giving a more nuanced description of how she feels. It's almost "too little too late" that it happens right at the end. Sure, it comes about through her crisis moment, but she'd been gradually understanding emotion before that, so the expression of it didn't really parallel her development. She gradually learns to be "human," but the narrative peels out from 0 to 60 very late in the game. There has to be some middle ground there.

Given that that's the only major problem I have with the story and it's not particularly hard to fix, I'm sending the story to Mars, which means I wouldn't need to do a full re-read of it if it gets resubmitted—I'd just need to spot-check things.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 690

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>after a hard day of working//
You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>Who is jealous of who//

Who is jealous of whom

Story:
>the emptied stein of cider//
That just sounds weird. Like "an empty glass of beer." If it's empty, it's not a glass of beer, is it? How about just "the emptied cider stein"?

>My attention was more focused on the worn bar surface, dark stained wood waxed to a tacky finish and smelling of years of spilt drinks.//

She doesn't really sound like her attention's focused on it, since she gives a pretty perfunctory description and doesn't miss anything the bartender says.

>In the reflection on the surface I could see myself, teal coat contrasted by my unkempt amber mane.//

I can't tell here whether you meant the surface of the bar, stein, or cider. Unless the stein's very clean (which you mentioned foam leaking down the sides), it'd discolor her reflection, wouldn't it?

>The barkeep moved to get her a stein and I could feel her eyes boring into the back of my head.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. I predict this will be a persistent problem.

>I managed to reign it back, however.//

Appropriately enough, "rein."

>She sat down just as the barkeep slid her cider across the bar. I took another drink and pondered if I should just get up and leave.//

"Just" is a very common word for authors to overuse. You only have 17 in the entire story, which isn't awful, but you tend to use it in clusters. In the current screenful alone, I see 7.

>occasionally glancing at me now and then//

Redundant.

>Her ears twitched and she seemed to pause for a moment.//

Yep, needs a comma. I'll mark all the spots I see, if it doesn't turn up too often. And she either paused or didn't pause. There's no "seem" to it.

>“But you’re part of the Wonderbolts now,” I pointed to the silver wings on her uniform.//

You've punctuated that as if it were an attribution, but it contains no speaking action.

>she hardly seemed to notice or care about it.//

What's her evidence for this? You're getting a little light on having them do things while they talk. A lot of it is quick-hit, simple actions. Here's a spot that deserves a little elaboration.

>old times sake//

times’

>I sighed//

She just did that two sentences ago.

>Rainbow didn’t say anything, which I was grateful about.//

Here's the beauty of a limited narrator: you don't have to tell me when she thinks, wishes, hopes, wants, etc. something. The narrator can express the sentiment. For example, if you had this line instead:
Thank goodness Rainbow didn't say anything.
I get she's grateful without your ever having to say it, and the more conversational style keeps less distance between me and the character.

>We both took a drink, and allowed silence to settle between us.//

Now you have the opposite problem. That's all one clause, and it's not particularly complex, so the comma is unnecessary.

>my teeth biting on my lower lip//

This externalizes the action and dissociates her from it. It's like the teeth are acting of their own accord. Keep these actions tied to her own volition.

>seemingly unsurprised//

How so? What does she look like? "Seem" is a word that authors should be wary of.

>Rainbow drained the contents of her mug and I did the same.//

Needs a comma.

By now, you're falling into a common drinking trap. Authors somehow lose all creativity when having two characters share a drink and can't think of anything else to have them do but some variation on "take a sip," "finish the drink," and "get another." I bet you can have some more creative actions for them to do.

>I went home that day and I cried like a foal.//

Needs a comma.

>her expression carefully neutral//

How does Lightning know it's "carefully" neutral? She might see some sign of it, but as stated, it requires her to read Dash's mind.

>Manehattan Weather team//

If you're going to capitalize "Weather," wouldn't "Team" be as well?

>gave me pause//

You used that phrase only about a page back. Maybe that's not so bad, but it's recent enough that I definitely remember seeing it.

>and as I drew myself back up from the table//

Needs a comma.

>Rainbow’s brow quirked upwards and her head tilted to the right.//

Needs a comma.

>“What do you mean?”//

I get that Rainbow's older now, but her dialogue is pretty formal and bland throughout. It lacks her personality. There can be reasons why it would. Maybe she's controlling herself to avoid the possibility of setting Lightning off, but there would be clues to her behavior then. Assuming that's the way you're going, it'd go a long way to make sure Dash comes across as testing the waters, expecting the worst but not getting the reactions she anticipated.

>My tail twitched and I smiled.//

Needs a comma.

>Her eyebrows shot upwards and her wings flitted at her sides.//

Needs a comma.

>my head lowering until it met the tacky surface of the bar//

>Reaching up//
>rolling my cup between my hooves//
>twisting her body around to look at me directly//
You've been pretty good about avoiding structural repetition, but I'm getting a lot of participial phrases lately. I don't think it's a problem yet, but keep an eye on it. It's a common problem for writers of moderate experience.

>It was a feeling I had still haven’t grown used to, and I don’t ever want to. Some feelings, after all, were far too good to get used to.//

Some jumbled syntax here. This is all one coherent thought. I agree with the choice of present tense in the first sentence, since it's an ongoing thing, but the second sentence should be the same.

>I felt no shame for the proud smile that crossed my face from ear to ear.//

And I don't have any idea why she would. The story doesn't suggest anything.

>We had to buy him one of his own, he kept taking ours apart and trying to rewire it.//

Comma splice. If you want an abrupt change of tack there, use a dash.

>She paused for a moment, and then answered with a simple. “It’s… different.”//

You don't need that period before the quote. The way it's presented, you don't need anything there, though you can use a comma if you want.

>“No, no,” she shook her head adamantly.//

Another non-speaking action presented as a dialogue attribution.

>For me it’s just ‘routine A, with flourish B, C, or D.//

You never closed the single quote.

>Her head lowered a bit and she gazed into the empty stein.//

Needs a comma.

>a sadness I hadn’t felt in years settle in my heart//

Another spot where you'd do better to let the way the narrator says something carry the sentiment instead of stating it outright. It's like the difference between the narrator saying she's excited to fly and having the narration get tripped up while going on about how much fun it'll be.

>she seemed to smile//

Watch that "seem" again. There's not much ambiguity for something like this. She either smiled or she didn't.

>a sad smile on her muzzle//

There you go. She actually did smile. So why dither about it?

>“But that’s past me now. I’m running the team here, I got a family to go home to, and I’m happy.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>What…I mean… well//

Use consistent spacing.

>more than enough to cover both our tabs and then some//

Redundant.

>Placing the wings in my bag, I made the short flight home.//

One of the dangers of participles: they imply concurrent action, so she places her wings in her bag during the short flight home. These likely happen in sequence, no simultaneously.

>hearing his gentle breaths in the silent room//

Another participle that should be set off with a comma.

>Careful not to wake him//

This kind of introductory element really needs to be set off with a comma.

>nuzzled his short, golden mane. He shifted in his sleep, nuzzling//

Watch that close repetition.

>He shifted in his sleep, nuzzling into his pillow while his forelegs squeezed his favorite toy, a stuffed rabbit my mother had given him, close to his chest, its gray fur meshing against his brown coat.//

That sentence kind of rambles on long enough that it loses focus. It probably deserves to be separated into one of him snuggling in and another about the rabbit.

>As I slipped into bed beside him my mind raced with memories of hairpin turns//

Needs a comma.

>death defying//

>pulse pounding//
You're using the whole phrase as a single descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>hearing his gentle breaths in the silent room//

>nuzzling into his pillow//
>its gray fur meshing against his brown coat//
>Satisfied he was sleeping well//
>snoring away//
>facing in the direction of my empty spot//
>listening to the steady drumbeat of his heart//
These are all the participial structures (one's actually an absolute phrase, which is closely related) in just the last two paragraphs. You don't overuse them in general, but there are places where they get clustered.

>I’ll never forget the joy on his face//

So why don't I get to see it?

>mommy’s//

This gets capitalized when used in place of a name, so it's "Mom," but "my mom."

>on what was normally a private box//

"In" a box, right?

>wonderbolts//

Capitalization.

>The maneuvers were basic and the speed was only fast enough for earth ponies and unicorns to be impressed.//

Needs a comma.

>Then something changed, she pulled ahead of her wingponies, and after a moment they flew faster as though to give chase.//

That first comma is a splice. You're clarifying or defining, so a colon would work.

Well, that ended abruptly. I was expecting some sort of acknowledgment on Dash's behalf or a character-affirming realization on Lightning's. The pieces are there for it, but it's almost too subtle. I think it would make the story stronger, but I won't require you to change it.

Most of these are very quick fixes about relatively minor issues, so I'm not concerned about the story's quality. When you're ready to resubmit, choose the "back from Mars" option.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 696

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>that they resembled the ones extending from her own back that were flitting nervously//

It's just a little clunky to have the two "that" clauses stacked up, but that's not a big deal. The main thing here is that I'm having trouble visualizing this statue you're describing. So the horse is gone, but it's replaced by something that looks like Adagio's Equestrian form? Or it's of her in human form, but with the magic horse ears like the other girls got? The other issue is that "nervously" is kind of a telly thing, which isn't that great to do in your first paragraph. Plus people don't have wings, so we lack the context of how one would flit them nervously. Let me see how you envision it. Lastly, there's a modifier placement issue. It sounds like it's her back that's flitting nervously.

>with a smile that had disarmed nations carved across its face//

Similar issue. It sounds like nations are carved across her face. It can be really tricky to get the wordings like this just right, and sometimes, there's just not a good answer.

>Reality rippled in front of her as Twilight Sparkle tumbled out onto her hands and knees, shivering as she stood up.//

Note that both "as" clauses and participial phrases synchronize things. So reality ripples at the same time Twilight tumbles out (so far, I'm on board), shivers (probably would happen after that, but maybe), and stands up (well, she can't stand up and be on her hands and knees at the same time).

>It just doesn’t seem to have been able to fit in such a small space. //

How she says this is a little off, since it's demonstrably false. She'd probably say something more like that she would have thought it could fit.

>Twilight looked at Adagio, back at the moon, then back again at Adagio, jaw dropped.//

Another misplace modifier, and this one more than the ones I've marked before really is ambiguous. Whose jaw dropped? By strict grammar, Adagio's did, but I bet you meant Twilight. Point is, you can't tell.

>... You’re//

No space after a leading ellipsis, but one's not really appropriate here anyway, since she's not just becoming audible or finishing an earlier suspended thought. There are similar instances later in the story.

>Twilight pursed her lips as Adagio continued her melodic mental assault of the populace, her footsteps now echoing off of the pavement as Adagio floated listlessly beside her.//

I assume those are Twilight's footsteps, but it's ambiguous. It'd help to organize the sentence better by character.

>Her lips quivered//

>Twilight looked at the quivering wreck//
These are in consecutive sentences. Watch the repetition.

>towards whom Twilight was gesturing at//

The "at" is redundant with the "toward."

>“I heard, Adagio.”//

I guess I'm surprised that this woman doesn't react to how familiarly Twilight speaks with Adagio. Has Adagio made sure people expected it?

>“That’s enough, Adagio.”//

They're using direct address an awful lot in this conversation. Think about how often you actually do in a real one.

>“I already told you, we’re—”

>
>A yellow man with blue hair shouted as he walked out//
That sounds like you were doing a dialogue attribution, but why break it across paragraphs?

>she said as she floated inside//

Adagio's doing a lot of floating. It's starting to get repetitive.

>Twilight grit her teeth//

Gritted. Looks like you have an extraneous space at the beginning of the line, too.

>Adagio sighed.//

Two things here. First, maneuver this sentence to the middle of your page. Then look at the first word of all the paragraphs you can see. Notice the repetition? Second, the narration os really lacking through this part of the conversation. They're barely doing anything. It feels less realistic this way, and it passes up a big avenue for including more emotional context.

>Twilight teared up.//

This sure glosses over a huge amount of emotion. Did Twilight know her friends had died? If so, why is she being so cordial with Adagio? If not, why doesn't she have more of a reaction than this?

>Because I can reason why you did that.//

She's awfully forgiving of a sentient creature who killed her friends. Even if she recognizes them as predators, they're sentient. It's not like they were acting on animal instinct. They chose to use deadly force rather than run away and set up their operation somewhere else. For that matter, they're from Equestria. They know all about Equestrian magic and deliberately attacked it. Basically, it's a thin argument that they were just defending themselves.

>each others’//

each other’s

>lambs waiting for the slaughter//

A little odd that they'd have this expression in Equestria. I dunno.

>except for Sunset Shimmer and myself//

Just use "me." This isn't the place for a reflexive pronoun.

>the magic of friendship only invests itself in extraordinary ponies, ponies destined to do great things//

This seems to run contrary to the show's message that such magic is available to everyone.

>Twilight’s pleas went unheeded//

This is getting confusing. Twilight was completely at Adagio's mercy, but then we find out she was only pretending. Then Twilight says she has magic more powerful than anything Adagio can muster, but Adagio really has her in a tough spot now. This is some cliched anime stuff here.

>Because people don’t die because you will it!//

Oddly repetitive phrasing.

>Adagio clenched her fist tightly around Twilight’s throat.//

She already did that, and there was no indication that she let up.

>smiling and wearing a green sundress//

Given the circumstances, how would she even notice or care what Sonata was wearing?

>Twilight wrapped her arms around herself, smiling. “Th-thank y-you.”

>
>With that, Twilight entered the statue, reality rippling as she passed into the stone.//
That's pretty much the same description we got at the beginning of the story.

Hm. The story just kind of stopped. All this tension was built up, then Sonata defuses it all, says there's some huge behind-the-scenes reason why all this is happening, then none of that ever plays out. Nothing about how Sonata says she'll try to keep Adagio contained, what Aria's doing, what happens to Sunset, the threats Adagio made against Equestria... Twilight's just going to go home and shrug all this off? Is this a setup for a sequel? It really feels like an incomplete story, and yet it does have a finality to it in that it doesn't have a momentum leading into resolving any of those things. There's just a huge volley of Chekhov's guns here, and they the characters go their separate ways with the assumption that things will work out. It lacks the resolution of a self-contained story or the motive force pushing it toward further development. This really left me with the sense of a story just starting its rising action, where nothing climactic has occurred, but we're starting to learn what the stakes are.

That said, this is a very interesting premise for a story. I like the uneven passage of time, but the two movies basically had it as equal, so is that something you're changing, or has Adagio somehow made that happen?

There's a good kernel of a story here, but it needs some development in the stylistic side (telly language, talking head, that kind of stuff) and more clarity that there's a point being made here or that is has a cliff-hanger-type feel leading into a continuation.

Majin SyeekohCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 701

>>696

Hi. I see your review.

First off, yes. I do tend to have issues with placing my modifiers and "talking heads", as it were. I'll have to touch up the stylistic side.


I guess the main drive of the story, in my mind, is Adagio's isolation of herself from both humanity and anyone that might be considered her equal. She doesn't eat. She doesn't walk. Human beings are cattle to her. She chased Aria off-planet after torturing Sunset for God-knows-how-many years and treats Sonata like a servant, despite Sonata just wanting be her friend.

To address the concern about the friendship thing: sure, anyone can have friends, but how many of those people can actionably weaponize friendship into rainbow lasers? That's the magic I was referring to.

Touching on that, the whole "just defending themselves" issue; Twilght's had a lot of time to stew on this; I would assume that she would have moved on at some point and accepted it. We as an audience also really have no idea what the power of the Elements would do at any time. From the sirens' perspective, it might very well have been a kill or be killed scenario. Also, Twilight felt comfortable enough to cross over at Adagio's request; this would intimate a certain amount of familiarity. Also, canon Twilight is incredibly forgiving. I could see her thinking that Adagio trying to reach out to her after she killed Twilight's friends as a possible sign of wanting to mend bridges and not use Twilight to convince Aria to give her back her torture-toy.

As for lambs waiting for the slaughter; That's a biblical reference. There are a few biblical references in the fic from that point onward, mainly to highlight how Adagio views herself. The entire setting is an extrapolation of a twisted view of monotheistic eschatology.

A lot of the fic was actually influenced by comic books I've read and somewhat relies on those influences in the climax. That may be where the anime influence you're sensing comes in. Any clarification on exact definitions would just be splitting hairs.

And yeah, it just ends with no one satisfied. Twilight's got a huge problem on her hands(hooves) that she's accidentally birthed, Adagio's worked herself up into a frenzy obsessed with the idea of remaking reality, and Sonata just wants a friend. You could argue that Aria and Sunset are the only ones satisfied, having removed themselves from the scenario. And it ends how it begins, with Adagio alone.

I know these aren't questions, more answering your issues that weren't style-related. I am of course open to further prodding: writing is a process, after all, and I'm always happy to receive such constructive criticism.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 702

>>701
>I guess the main drive of the story, in my mind, is Adagio's isolation of herself from both humanity and anyone that might be considered her equal. She doesn't eat. She doesn't walk. Human beings are cattle to her. She chased Aria off-planet after torturing Sunset for God-knows-how-many years and treats Sonata like a servant, despite Sonata just wanting be her friend.
Adagio had pretty much already been treating humans like cattle, so at least that hasn't changed. She's overt about it now, but it was still there. Since you brought up Sonata, that's probably something that deserves a mention earlier in the story. Twilight never indicates an interest in what happened to the other two. At least Aria gets incorporated pretty soon, but Sonata basically gets ignored until she makes a very convenient appearance. It was hard to tell exactly what her relationship with Adagio was. Adagio's been torturing Sunset and would probably love to do the same to Aria, yet Sonata doesn't seem afraid of her at all. So either she's comfortable that Adagio won't hurt her, or she knows Adagio can't. Either way, I understand your explanation of what's developed, but that should come out in the story. I had no idea, and it's too integral to the story to leave that completely open to the reader to fill in or ignore as he sees fit.

>To address the concern about the friendship thing: sure, anyone can have friends, but how many of those people can actionably weaponize friendship into rainbow lasers? That's the magic I was referring to.

That's another thing that probably deserves explanation. Given that a specific function of magic is given in the series title and (though Adagio wouldn't have been there to witness it) Twilight's monologue to Sunset in the first movie, this is likely what a reader is going to assume you mean.

>Touching on that, the whole "just defending themselves" issue

I can buy Twilight making the trip on the off chance that Adagio is earnest in wanting to repent. But even when it's apparent she isn't, it's hard to believe Twilight's still so controlled in dealing with someone who killed her five closest and most long-standing friends (well, at least she has the luxury of still getting to interact with the pony versions, but as has been demonstrated that the human ones have identical personalities, there'd still be a hell of a lot of baggage associated with forgiving their deaths). In the show, Twilight's never killed or seriously harmed an enemy. Nightmare Moon was healed, Discord and Tirek were imprisoned, Chrysalis was expelled... yes, you're taking a darker tack than canon, but it helps to spell out the stakes. If you casually mentioned that in your version, Tirek suffered a horrible death, for instance, then I'm more inclined to believe that Adagio feared such a fate. She's from Equestria and familiar with ponies, so she'd know their canon tendency not to do any real harm, or your AU version, whatever it is, but that should be established.

>As for lambs waiting for the slaughter

Yeah, I know the origin of the expression, but it suggests there is such a things as animal sacrifice in Equestria for Twilight to use the phrase, which I find surprising. It'd be pretty ungainly to go into even a short digression to assert that this is actually the case, and I doubt this would occur to more than a handful of readers, so that was just my opinion. I don't think it's really necessary to change it, unless you agree it has an odd implication and want your story as clean as possible.

>And it ends how it begins, with Adagio alone.

And this could be entirely believable, as well as a valid message: that she's let the power go to her head so much that she's lost everything. The issue I have with that message is twofold.

1) Her ranting only speaks to her anger that her authority is being questioned and defied. It's not at all apparent from her reaction that she fears being alone. Make that come out, that it dawns on her it's the fate awaiting her, there's nothing she can do about it, it scares her to death, and rather than try to change it, her immaturity (or whatever) just makes her lash out even more. Then, I'd say you're on to something. That's a very real, relatable, and emotionally invested point to make.

2) The story ends leaning in a direction that she still may have an opportunity to get what she wants (with that kind of power, what's preventing her from going to the moon anyway?), Sonata may yet change her, and Aria may yet raise a successful rebellion. Things are still in flux to the point that Adagio could still get what she wants or be soundly defeated without realizing her error. Either one would undercut the story's message, ad none of the characters seem particularly invested in the potential outcomes. Obviously Adagio would prefer to win, but back to my point about being alone, there's no clear cost to her losing beyond the default one.

The way Twilight and Adagio keep one-upping each other is something I could live with, I guess, but it's one of those cliched things that make people groan about many plots, particularly in anime, where everyone just keeps breaking out their bigger and badder attack in the nick of time, while things just get more ridiculous. It's not the kind of thing I'd reject a story over; I'm just pointing it out as weak writing, at least in my opinion, but it's a common enough thing and has enough of an audience who don't see a problem with it that I can't call it wrong. I do think Twilight's side of it was a little too subdued, though. Adagio seemed genuinely surprised each time Twilight rallied, but the very brief and understated reaction Twilight showed to Adagio's second attack didn't ring true. Even the first was less a surprise to her of Adagio's strength—more just that Adagio dared to attack her at all. The fact that she let Adagio nearly strangle her before easily breaking out of the hold seems inconsistent.

Some of these are certainly more personal judgments that I'd be willing to compromise on or ask for another opinion. I'm not sure whether you're just answering questions or making a case for leaving those things as is.

Majin SyeekohCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 703

>>702

I guess you could say it's a bit of both; I mean, I like the narrative as is, but as always, I'm open to changing things if necessary.

The fact that you asked those questions is sort of a double edged sword; It means that you're somewhat invested in the story, but also that certain things weren't clear enough.

Well, it still needs some heavy stylisitc editing, so I guess we'll cross that bridge when we get there.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 722

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Fluttershy convinced herself she must have been the one who misunderstood.//

Look how conversational a tone your narrator has taken so far. It's a very limited narration in Fluttershy's perspective, and yet this doesn't sound like an internal musing of hers. It sounds like a very external, omniscient statement in that it doesn't involve her emotion at all. Keep this consistent with the narrative voice you've been using.

>Nopony was missing, they just had their nose in a book.//

Comma splice.

>in excitement//

These perpositional phrases that directly inform me of a character's mood are always tell and almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence. Her dialogue, for instance, already connotes excitement. You could add a bit of body language if you don't think that's enough, but don't resort to this.

>Angel loves them so much, when Rarity told me—//

I can't think of a way that sentence would conclude without that being a comma splice.

>They stood before a table draped with a red velvet cloth concealing a large, irregularly shaped object. Twilight's magical aura surrounded the covering, lifting it at the corners and a point in the center. It rose and landed nearby, revealing a slab of yellowish brown translucent rock.//

Don't let your sentence structures get in a repetitive rut. Look at this paragraph.
1) Main clause, participial phrase, participial phrase.
2) Main clause, participial phrase.
3) Main clause, participial phrase.

>The rock itself didn't bother her, it was what it contained.//

Comma splice. I see this will be a recurring problem.

>left her uneasy. Not frightened, but unsettled//

You're doing an awful lot of stating her attitudes here instead of demonstrating them.

>Twilight's face looked so eager.//

Just her face? And how does that look anyway?

>but realizing her blunder//

Now you've skipped into Twilight's perspective. That or had Fluttershy read her mind. How does Fluttershy interpret this as Twilight's intent? That's how to keep it grounded in her perspective.

>Guiding her eyes upward, towards the fossilized remains, she halted at its feet.//

Note that participial phrases mean that things happen at the same time. So she guides her eyes upward while they stop at its feet. That doesn't make sense.

>It was interesting in an unnerving way//

You've already said that, and yet you haven't said why it's unnerving.

>Rarity scolded her whenever she did that: It was un-lady like and caused unsightly wrinkles.//

I don't see the function of the comma here. As placed, what follows it should define, clarify, or elaborate on "that," but it elaborates on Rarity's scolding. And you only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences, but it doesn't here.

>Now”—unable to contain herself, Twilight giggled in a wholly undignified manner—“look//

This may be correct. But I think it's more likely that this is correct:
Now—” unable to contain herself, Twilight giggled in a wholly undignified manner “—look
The difference? In your version, there's no pause in the speech, so she'd be giggling while talking. In my version, she stops speaking to giggle. Fine shade of meaning, and maybe your version is what you intended.

>unconvincingly//

Another time that you've popped out of Fluttershy's perspective. Why would she think her own reply was unconvincing? Either she's reading Twilight's mind or her body language; if the latter, then you need to let me see it, too.

>startled to find a distressed face staring back. Where once Twilight's face radiated excitement, now a faltering grin wobbled under uneasy eyes//

Look at all that emotion spelled out unequivocally for the reader. Part of the engagement of reading is figuring out these things for myself. It's how we naturally read each other anyway: by noticing cues from facial expression, body language, tone of voice. It's much more interesting to do the same thing with written characters.

>Apprehension fought enthusiasm//

And still more of this. Focus on how this makes Fluttershy feel, both in terms of what thoughts run through her head (either presented as quotes or, as is better for this type of narrator, directly in the narration) and what physical symptoms it causes.

>Sitting still and serious, the last of Fluttershy's anxiety vanished.//

Another danger of participial phrases: they can be dangling modifiers. Here, "sitting still and serious" is supposed to describe Fluttershy, but it can't because she doesn't appear in noun form in the clause. You're explicitly saying that her anxiety is sitting still and serious.

>with happiness//

Another blatantly telly phrase. I hope you get the idea. I'm not going to mark any more, unless it's for another reason.

>ill formed//

Hyphenate multi-word descriptors like this, unless the first word is an -ly adverb.

>Fast moving//

Hyphenate.

>She was alone and the grass began to make noise again.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>but the one by the tree was now far away, but moving closer//

The repetitive "but" produces a double negative feel, though sometimes it's hard to avoid such a phrasing.

>She ate, a mouthful swallowed in haste. The grass no longer had taste.//

You might want to go with something like "flavor." The unintentional rhyme is undercutting the tension.

>She'd upset their plan and now they moved quietly.//

>But she was ahead and soon their stamina would wane.//
>The tall grass would tire them and she would use it.//
>Fear drove her and she careened on.//
Comma between the clauses.

>her’s//

No such word, except under extremely unusual circumstances.

>Confused thoughts whipped through Twilight//

Why are you switching perspective here? It's rather abrupt, for one, and for another, I don't see what it buys you. The story is about Fluttershy's experience. There's nothing to be gained by going into Twilight's head.

>died?//

When a question mark or exclamation mark is on an italicized word, you'll normally italicize it, too.

>The body was covered quickly, that’s why everything’s intact.//

Comma splice.

>her—“//

Note that dashes often break smart quotes. These are backward. This happens a number of times in the story.

Well, that story was a great idea. For the most part, it's written well, too. The only question I have regarding the plot is if Fluttershy knew this would happen. On the one hand, she seems to allude to it, given her trepidation about fossils. On the other, it seemed to catch her by surprise. Is this part of her talent? If so, why would she keep that secret? Twilight even seems to know a little about it, but how much is unclear.

So, there are two big things here. First, there is an abundance of telly language here. There's a brief discussion of "show versus tell" in one of the sections at the top of this thread, if you want a little more than what I've already said about it. You can get away with it some for the middle sections, since it does match an animal mentality to be that blunt; however, animals understand less about their emotions, so by that token, maybe they actually would think about their emotions more in terms of how they behave than drawing a conclusion about it. But the beginning and ending passages are absolutely too telly. It's short-circuiting a lot of the story's power to feed me those conclusions instead of leading me to them.

The other is the odd perspective shift at the end. Again, I don't see what benefit you get from going to Twilight's perspective, but if you're dead set on it, you need to make the transition to it much more smoothly. That's covered as part of the discussion on "head hopping" at the top of this thread. It might be easier just to have Twilight as the viewpoint character for the entire final scene, but I think the story loses some of its impact that way. It's really about Fluttershy's experience, so let her tell it.

One more thing—the story could use a little stronger conclusion. What message do you want the reader to take away from this? None of the characters have changed as a result of this experience, except that Fluttershy perhaps has a new appreciation for herself, if she didn't know about this ability before. Or perhaps Twilight has a new appreciation for Fluttershy. If I were to guess, I'd say you were going for the latter and trying to accentuate it with the perspective shift to Twilight, but it's entirely possible to communicate that Twilight has this change of attitude while remaining in Fluttershy's viewpoint.

Really, these are easy things for me to check over, so I wouldn't require a full re-read. So when you're ready to resubmit, please choose the "back from Mars" option.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 724

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>There was the slightest bit of doubt hidden in my reply//

It's always really odd to see very external assessments like this in first person or third limited. This is Twilight herself speaking, so more immediate to her would be the emotion itself or the fleeting thoughts going through her head, not summing them up in a single word. Furthermore, it makes it sound like it's almost deliberate.

>I thought back to my last visit.//

This and the next paragraph are awfully extraneous. What does it have to do with the topic? Rarity's trying to get her to go for a checkup, and now she's digressing about becoming an alicorn, and yet she doesn't draw any conclusion from it to tie the digression back. If she's in fact immortal, then preventative care is useless, isn't it? I was waiting for you to make such a point, but you never did.

>I had to agree that was probably the best way to look at it.//

This is already the 8th use of "was" in the story. "To be" verbs are inherently boring, and the beginning of the story, where you're trying to hook the reader, is an especially bad place to cluster them.

>I already have us scheduled for this afternoon.//

Given what you already said about the responsibilities Twilight has now, it seems rather foolhardy for Rarity to have already made an appointment. How does she know Twilight would be available then? I think it would speak to their characterization to say so. Like Rarity went behind Twilight's back to check with her official agenda-keeper (Spike) or sacrificed a spa date they had together, for instance.

>Stepping inside, the sterile air reminded me of my own lab at home//

A classic dangling participle. "Stepping inside" is supposed to modify Twilight, or perhaps both of them, but neither character appears as a noun in the clause that'd parse as such. You explicitly say that the air stepped into the room.

>not-so-obvious attempts to remain calm//

I don't get to see any of them? Again, Twilight herself is speaking. Let the narration carry this. She'd be more cognizant of the symptoms this causes that the reason behind them. So what physical feelings does it cause? What is she doing? Why doesn't the narration itself sound nervous?

>simple horn exam//

And that's really all she's there for? Why not the rest of her, too?

>phased//

fazed

>Fields and Streams, Better Stables and Gardens, Mare’s Day, C—the Celestia Magazine//

Fine point, but the commas aren't part of the titles, so they shouldn't be italicized.

>“you can come back now.”

>
>I placed the magazine back in the rack and got up from chair.//
Note the close repetition of "back." It's not a bad instance, but it's best to avoid if you can.

>“Twilight,” she said, “Would//

The way you've punctuated it, the capitalization is off.

>know…for moral support…as a friend//

The most standard ways of spacing ellipses are like... this, or ... this, or . . . this. The first usually formats better, as the rest allow for line breaks in ungainly places.

>who was here helping who//

who was here helping whom

>Please wait in there, the doctor will be along shortly//

Comma splice.

>We stepped inside//

This is exactly what they did at the front door.

>all that comfortable to sit on either. It all//

Watch that close repetition again.

>We both stood there waiting for the doctor without picking a seat.//

Why not? It's pretty obvious Twilight's supposed to be on the table.

>My hooves were getting restless. Rarity paced in slow circles.//

So what is Twilight doing with her hooves? And from your description of the room, it doesn't sound like there'd be room to pace, particularly since you still have Twilight standing out in the middle of the floor, too.

>polished stone floor//

That doesn't sound like a good idea for a doctor's office. I've only ever seen linoleum, and that's for a few reasons: it's cheap, easy to replace and clean, and it's a relatively soft surface that probably won't damage an instrument dropped on it.

>Hello and good afternoon ladies.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>unicornalisys//

Any medical terms I've seen with this type of ending would suggest a spelling of "unicornalysis."

>Who would like to go first//

But the nurse only called Twilight back. Why wouldn't the doctor know which one he's there for? He'd only have a sheet for one of them, and so probably wouldn't assume both had something scheduled until they said so.

>Alright Princess//

Comma for direct address.

>setting it on the floor//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>but only succeeded in making it more awkward//

How so? Rarity doesn't act any differently, and Twilight doesn't say that anything's changed for her, either.

>I breathed a silent sigh of relief.//

These prepositional phrases that say "of/in/with" some emotion or attitude are almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence. The sigh already connotes relief. You can add in some body language or context about her physical reaction, but there's no need to name the emotion directly.

>I-I changed my mind//

Ah. And her motive comes out. This is a nice way to have the plot go. It's sympathetic yet subtle.

>visibly shaken and quite obviously scared//

More telly language. The trembling already paints the picture. You can add more if you like, but make her look and act scared instead of just telling me she is. An actor doesn't look at the audience and say, "I'm scared." Neither should your written character. How does an actor get you to think his character is scared? Have your character do the same things. Focus on how things like posture, body language, facial expression, and what she says. Don't directly identify any emotions. Imply it all through your description.

>I said, rushing to her side//

I've looked ahead a few paragraphs. Twilight's actions are consistent with someone concerned about her friend, but her narration isn't. Once more, the narrator is Twilight speaking her internal thoughts. Yet she's just spouting facts about what she's doing. Why be so formal? The narration should convey the sudden thoughts running through her head as this turn of events catches her by surprise. She's concerned for her friend and sympathetic about Rarity's fear, but the sentences of the narration itself sound like Twilight's reading a book. Personalize it. What would you think in her situation? How would you think it? Jumbled wording, all of the worst possible outcomes flooding your mind, questions about how to handle it... that all would feel natural. This feels sterile.

>but all it’s done is make me more nervous it seems//

Comma between the clauses.

>The doctor did his best to help and coax Rarity up onto the exam table.//

So what did he do?

>I held her hoof while he hooked up the probes. Swiftly and gently, we made ready for the test to begin.//

This is so understated and factual. I'm not getting any of Twilight's emotion at all.

>The ball rose another head or two so it settled right about where I’d kept it.//

Comma between the clauses.

>might have an acute case//

This seems oxymoronic. Shouldn't an acute case be very definitive? Or is he sure something's wrong, but this might not be the problem? If so, it's presumptive to mention it as a possibility.

>I had to tell myself to breathe.//

This is the first instance where the narration carries any real emotion. But the rest of the paragraph goes back to a very formal, factual style.

>Stepping up to the console, my first impression//

Another dangling participle. It says her impression stepped up.

>who continued to bear the burden of the poor test results//

Comma for the dependent clause. And this kind of error is exactly why doctors don't like to give you a dire diagnosis right away. Yes, people make mistakes, but wouldn't it have occurred to him to double-check everything?

>His shoulders fell and he slumped back onto his hindquarters.//

Comma between the clauses.

>We left the office and didn’t look back. Having a cupcake to celebrate our good health seemed the most appropriate thing to do.//

This is really plowing through the denouement. It's like you're rushing to the finish line. Wouldn't they talk about it over their cupcakes? I guess I'm looking for a point that the story is making. What message do you want a reader to take away. There's a stressful event that happens to these two friends... and then what? How does the experience change either of them or their relationship? The real story is what happens next. You've built up tension here, but there's no message in how it gets resolved, at least not that we get to experience with the characters. There's just a quick one-paragraph summary that has Twilight narrating something well after the fact to some unknown audience.

For that matter, I'm not sold on what had Rarity so worried in the first place. She just mentions some vague thing about knowing something was wrong, but we never know what. I think it'd build a lot more reader investment in her situation if you didn't leave it so nebulous.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 941

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I let out a great sigh of boredom//

There's a brief discussion of "show versus tell" at the top of this thread that I'd recommend you read. Bottom line, it forces a distance between me and the character when you draw the conclusion of boredom for me. Make me an observer there with her. Show me what I see and hear that will lead me to think she's bored.

>It’s below freezing here and the cold sends a deep tremble up and down my spine.//

I see a lot of these in the story, where you need to place a comma between two clauses. There's another section on "comma use with conjunctions" up top that covers this.

>It’s sad to think it could be this cold anywhere in the middle of summer.//

This is only the third sentence of the story, and you've already totaled 3 "to be" verbs. There are 4 by the end of the first paragraph. This is an inherently boring verb. It's impractical to remove every one, but you should try for active language where possible. It makes the story more interesting, which is especially important at the beginning, since you want to grab the reader's interest here.

>Actually, it seems like the only things that exist here are sterile smells of stiff, dead rooms; things that only provide barriers between us and the outside world.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as incomplete. The second part here couldn't.

>I wrap my hooves around myself as I try to warm myself up.//

Watch repeating a word in a close space like this. You could just remove the second "myself" altogether.

>The chilled air seems to seep through my coat.//

You used "seem" twice in the first paragraph, so this gets repetitive, too, and this isn't a much better verb than "to be." In fact, it feels inaccurate here. The cold air actually is seeping through her coat, isn't it?

>Another shiver runs through me.//

Watch this repetition, too. You just used "through."

>Tilting my head, I gaze up and watch a tiny speck of lint drift lazily through the air; past the nurse’s desk where my name can be seen scribbled in red ink on a whiteboard; past the iron double doors that allow ponies only to enter.//

Misused semicolons again. Maybe you were going for a superlist here, but the list items aren't very complex and don't have their own internal commas.

>“She will. Maybe she’ll bring your brother too,” the other mare reassures.//

This is a weak choice of speaking verb, as you're having it take the speech as its direct object, while the verb's meaning would really require it to take the person being reassured as its direct object.

>I perk up slowly in my seat, hoping to hear what they’re saying.//

You just had her hope two sentences ago. For that matter, why phrase it like this at all? It forces a bit of disconnect when used in a limited narration, and first person is about as limited as it gets. There's a fine line between phrasing it one way or another, but the way you have it feels external to her thought process, like someone else is observing it. If she's hoping something, she just hopes it. She doesn't say she hopes it. So something like "in case I can catch a snippet of what they're saying" feels more like it's coming from within her head. Same goes for the other hope two sentences ago. And the same goes for other related actions, like want, wish, or think. Don't have the narrator say she hopes it. In a limited narration, have the narrator hope it for her.

>I’ve only been here two days//

So why are the other patients already wondering why she doesn't get visitors? There's been only one or two possible opportunities. It's not like they can classify it as a recurring thing yet.

>heart-felt//

heartfelt

>Nothing else seems to exist for this brief moment as I grip my pastern tightly//

These can be a bit tougher to spot, but there's a structural repetition here. You just had an "as" clause in the previous sentence.

>I failed everyone when I decided to take a razor blade as my only friend.//

How in the world does she even have that? It's not like it'd be allowed in there, and she hasn't even mentioned having any clothes, so where could she have even hidden it?

>Her expression melts into a concerned smile.//

>she says kindheartedly//
Just another couple of spots where it'd be better to get me to interpret the stated emotion from the character's appearance and behavior than to state the emotion directly.

>as she cautiously walks over//

And another spot where you use "as" clauses in consecutive sentences.

>An awkward silence lingers between us as I grip my pastern tighter, the silence thickens as each empty second passes.//

Comma splice.

>My gratitude is quickly disclosed; almost perfunctory.//

Oddly phrased and quite external to her, as well as being telly. And the semicolon is misused.

>This stops//

"This" has an oddly analytical feel. Just use "she" here.

>as if she thinks this exchange is about to force some kind of realization upon me and she has just noticed that she isn’t playing her part properly//

It's generally a bad idea to go on at length about a character's motivation. An extended metaphor is fine, but you don't want to beat the reader over the head and spell out her intent in detail.

>I … I made a promise and I…//

Note the inconsistent spacing of the ellipses. The latter is the more standard way.

>She gets up from her chair and slides into the dead couch with me, sighing, “You really had me worried there. I mean, you didn’t call anypony except me, huh?”//

"Sigh" is often a questionable speaking verb as well. It can work for short quotes, but it's unreasonable for her to sigh all that.

>who-//

I'll only mark this once, but you're using hyphens for asides and interruptions where you really need dashes. You can produce one by holding Alt while typing 0151 on the keypad.

>She trails off.//

I can already see that from the way you ended her dialogue with an ellipsis. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>rushing pass//

>i need to do it//
Typos.

>I keep hidden; all the hurt prickling up my insides//

Misused semicolon.

>It feels like it’s slipping away.//

But this means very little to me. Show me how it feels. You just got through an entire paragraph of good imagery about how the truth makes her feel, so why skimp now? For that matter, Lockheart as the narrator doesn't sound like her sanity's slipping away. She sounds rather calm and collected, able to reason through her situation very well. If her sanity is slipping away, the narration should sound like it.

>wanting me to know she’s giving me her undying attention//

She may look that way, but how does Lockheart know? To state it as a fact like this requires Lockheart to read her friend's mind.

>I mean, nopony has ever said that to me; claimed me like that.//

Misused semicolon.

>in a moment’s notice//

I've only ever seen it as "at" a moment’s notice..

>The darkness inside me tends to mute out any light. Yet in this moment, for once in my whole life, I can see a speck of brightness. It’s faint, but it’s something I’ve needed to see.//

This is all so factual. It's not drawing me into her struggle at all. It's more how the narrator says it than what she says. She's reaching the peak of her internal conflict, but she sounds like she's reading from a textbook. You do fine with this in the dialogue. In a narration this limited, even that should sound like dialogue. Write the narration as if she were saying it out loud, and let it carry the emotion like her speech does.

>I see the expression on her face change from concerned to hurt and… yes, anger.//

Very, very telly. This is the emotional climax of the story, which is absolutely the wrong time to be using telly language.

>Her eyes narrow as she looks at the pastern I’m cradling and then up at me. She meets my gaze, her eyes clear and cold.//

See, here's a spot where you do it right. You don't mention a single emotion, but it's crystal clear how she feels and what she's thinking through her actions.

>I steps sideways//

Typo.

So, it should be obvious what the recurring problems were. On the mechanical side, there's a decent amount of repetition, some missing commas, and every semicolon was inappropriate. And on the aesthetic side, it gets telly at the wrong times.

On the more abstract side, the characterization was fine. Quite good, actually. The plot was fine, too, with two notable exceptions. First, the ending didn't so much come to a conclusion as just stop. It's unclear which way Lockheart will go, which is fine, but the key to making an open ending work is to have the characters invested in all the possible outcomes. Now, I think just tuning up Lockheart's emotional response in the places I noted it was weak will fix this. Mostly. It needs to be obvious that she cares about her decision and has important consequences to either decision. She just doesn't seem to care that much, beyond a brief, vague assurance in the narration that she does.

And speaking of vagueness, that gets to the other issue. Is her problem really only that she cuts herself? While not healthy, it's not some doom-and-gloom thing, either. It's just so nebulous what she's done, why it's so bad that she's in this facility (involuntarily?), and why her friend feels so strongly about it. It's hard to get the reader invested in the outcome when he doesn't know what the stakes are, and they're just never really defined here.

Otherwise, the writing's pretty good, and I'd like to see this fixed up so I can post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 950

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

There are quite a few really awkward phrasings in the opening diary entry. At first, I was wondering whether that was your concept of her voicing, but it carries into the narration as well. To a degree, that makes sense, but there's a difference between how she'd write things and say them. For that matter, the diary came across as really strange. She's documenting pretty pointless things, and yet says she's doing so for future readers. Yet I can't fathom why any future reader would care about such things, and that's not the purpose of a diary anyway.

You often use hyphens where you should be using dashes.

>"Mmhmm," she nodded, then - "Am I really here so often? I suppose having a 'usual’ speaks for itself, in a way.”//

There's just a lot of inconsistency here. Note how there's a non-speaking action punctuated as if it's an attribution. Then you break back into the quote in a way that's effectively a comma splice, yet you punctuate the transition as if it ware a narrative aside. And then there is a mix of quotation mark styles.

>A mare like yourself will blend right in," he winked. //

Apparently this will be a recurring problem. Dialogue attributions require speaking verbs.

>I'm looking—“//

Note how dashes can break smart quotes. You'll have to paste in a correct one from somewhere else. And pleasse make your quotation mark style consistent throughout the story.

>zoetropic//

Okay, I can buy Rarity having a florid speaking and writing style, but you're really pushing her vocabulary. You do this again in chapter 3 with "bathymetry."

>From her own window on the opposite side, she could see the slow rises and falls of the Unicorn Range painting the horizon, occluding her view of Ponyville; and in front of them, a staggering number of identical green hills.//

What's after the semicolon couldn't stand as a complete sentence. As it's part of a compound structure, I suppose it could technically be called a superlist, but that's really not necessary here, as a comma wouldn't be confusing.

>easily…!//

That's one punctuation combo that doesn't make sense. How do you trail off emphatically?

>most— shall//

The standard is to surround an en dash with spaces and to use no spaces around an em dash.

>look," she leaned forward and rested her head on her foreleg, "we're//

This is a special case, since it appears you're going for a narrative aside instead of trying to use a non-speaking action as an attribution. I'll at least give you the benefit of the doubt that it's the case. Here's how to do it:
look—" she leaned forward and rested her head on her foreleg "—we're

>She rolled her eyes for emphasis.//

Watch your perspective. As worded, this requires Rarity to read Searcher's mind and divine her intent.

>Rarity pursed her lips in contemplation.//

These "in/of/with" prepositional phrases that bluntly give a character's emotion or motivation are rarely a good idea, mostly, is is the case here, they're redundant with a context clue already present.

>I asked if she were after any particular kind//

This is something that actually happened, so the subjunctive mood isn't really called for.

>you know, for your head//

It's a quote, so capitalize it like one.

>Rarity found herself blushing, and pushed on.//

That's all one clause. No need for a comma.

>pray tell//

Capitalization.

>like, the Sea Spray//

Why is that comma there?

>places like that//

Capitalization again. This isn't completing an earlier suspended thought. It's a new sentence.

>At last she imparted - “yikes.”//

You have a tendency to do this: not capitalize the first word of a quote that has some kind of unusual transition to it and use a dash as that unusual transition. I honestly don't know what the dash is supposed to impart here. It's not linking clauses. It's not being used in conjunction with a conversational style in the narration, which has an abrupt change of subject. I just don't see the purpose of this setup, and if it's not accomplishing that, then why have it any different from the standard?

>a look of sudden remembrance//

How would that look? You're supposed to give me the visual and let m interpret the emotion. Here, you're giving me a pretty abstract feeling and asking me to extrapolate an appropriate expression for you. That's a good way to keep the character at arm's length from the reader.

>collective conscience//

Are you sure this is the term you want? The language use here is sophisticated enough that I'd guess it is, but she hasn't been arguing anything from a moral standpoint, so I'm not sure how conscience applies. Maybe you were going for the philosophical concept of collective unconscious? It would seem to fit the tenor of Searcher's argument more.

>Whinniepeg//

Not sure why you're spelling it like that, when the horse noise is "whinny."

>'okay//

Capitalization again. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

At this point, I have to say a lot of Searcher's profanity feels gratuitous. It's not above the line for what we'd allow, but I don't get what purpose it serves, either. Surely she could read that Rarity is a bit put off by it, and I'd think someone with her mindset would find it a cheap way of communicating which forgoes saying things of substance.

Now that I'm at the end of chapter 1, a few thoughts. Soul Searcher is very, very annoying. Maybe you intend her to be and maybe you don't, but just be aware that she's going to be fairly polarizing. Whether I like her or not is immaterial, and I do see how she's advancing the plot, but it took a really long time to get there. It's not that the direction of their conversation felt unnatural, just that it developed so slowly that it really left me with the impression that I was wading through a whole bunch of irrelevant material meant to fill out the space between leaving town and arriving in Vanhoover.

That the story eventually did provide purpose to all that is better than not doing so, but it's unlikely I'll be the only reader to have that sentiment about it, and I have a reason to press on, namely that I'm evaluating the story for acceptance. Other readers may well give up, and that's something I have to take into account. For that matter, Rarity's own sentiment really came out of the blue. I can understand her need to see what else is out there, but even after hearing out Searcher and largely agreeing with her, she still has a soft spot for home. Then to do an about-face and basically accuse all her friends and family of doing that to her intentionally... well, it's disingenuous. There's no build-up to it, like this is something that's been brewing for a long time, and then she doesn't even consider that she does the same thing to everyone else, that she also keeps them tied down in the same way? The way it's presented, it kind of fights itself between being a deep-seated feeling and a spur-of-the-moment rant. Internal contradiction is fine—it's what makes for interesting characters. Rarity's generous, but she's also selfish. I can see that being in play here, but it still needs to make sense. And her sudden rejection is hard to swallow, depending on which end of that spectrum of deep-seated or spur-of-the-moment she's coming from.

Let me phrase it a little differently. This (so far, at least) is a character piece about Rarity. You want the reader to find her interesting, compelling, and consistent. He's going to be spending quite a bit of time with her after all. So I come out of this chapter finding her just as annoying as Searcher. Now, you'll get some of that anyway, from readers who just don't like Rarity no matter what. It's just another danger of losing readers if they're not enjoying the ride or the ride itself doesn't make sense to them.

Maybe part of it is that the stakes are so loosely defined. Rarity speaks so vaguely about why she's leaving that it's hard to know exactly what the conflict is about. It's definitely not evident from her journal entries, and those felt so superfluous anyway. I'm going on a bit of a tangent here, but there seems to be a pacing problem as well. This starts out seeming like it's going to be a journal fic. The the journal goes away, never to be brought up again, at least in this chapter. There's a stopover in one city, briefly boarding the train... then we spend well over half the chapter in a single conversation. And I'm of two minds about it. The conversation flowed nicely, and I could follow it. It felt realistic, which is pretty much all you can ask for out of one. On the one hand, it drags on so long that it suffers from "why say in three words what you can say in twenty" syndrome, but it may well be that trimming it back significantly would make it feel rushed. We'll see how that pans out as I get through the rest of the chapters.

But back to the conflict. There's nothing concrete. We do get something about a love interest from Applejack, but beyond AJ telling her not to go and Rarity referring to it as cutting a rather important connection, there's no reason for me to be particularly invested in it, because I have no idea what it means to Rarity. If I don't know why she cares, why would I? You're kind of relying on the reader to generate that investment for you, which is a common pitfall of shipping stories.

It's really the strength of writing that's keeping me going, because I have to think it's a sign of an author who will tie it all up nicely, though it's hard to gain that kind of trust from a general audience.

So, on to chapter 2.

The diary has taken a different turn, now seemingly addressed to Applejack instead of a generic reader. Though I don't get a sense from her of why she changed that.

(I did chapter 2 nearly a week after chapter 1, so excuse me if I repeat myself.)

>Equestria - and//

Please use a proper dash for interruptions and asides, not a hyphen.

And then she switches from addressing Applejack to addressing herself. This diary just can't decide what it wants to be.

>Rarity was gripped by a surge of guilt//

This has less impact when I have to take the narrator's word for it. Let me see her acting or sounding guilty myself.

>Without… her//

I get that you're italicizing the diary text to make it stand out, And I get that un-italicizing that word becomes the emphasis. But that implies she actually wrote it in print versus cursive, or slanted font versus upright, or some such. Consider how people really emphasize handwritten words. Surely she'd underline it or make it bold instead.

>I ducked into a café and hid until she was gone//

Her motive in doing so is awfully vague. It seems loosely connected to her feeling dissociated from her friends, but that didn't really jell until after she'd spoken with Searcher. So I'm left wondering why she avoided Granny Smith.

>fish her boots out from her suitcase//

Maybe not the best word choice of "fish," given your recent use of it to describe another passenger's scent.

>see—“//

There are a few things, like dashes, that can break smart quotes. These are backward.

>now -” a mischievous grin - “so//

Be consistent about your dash placement. Either both go with the speech or both go with the aside, not one of each. With the speech means that she stops speaking for the aside's action, and with the aside means she doesn't.

>Their repulsion is… beyond words.//

This is a common mistake in journal or diary formats. The ellipsis is a pretty distinctly vocal affectation. It implies that the person is stalling to think of what to say, but that doesn't happen in writing. You can just sit there until you know what word you want, then complete the unbroken sentence. Having one there in a journal entry means she put it there very deliberately, because there's an intent behind doing so. I don't see a purpose to it here. What does it add? It's taking away a sense of being genuine.

>"And what is that supposed to mean?"//

I notice you've switched from the fancy-style quotation marks. Looks like it happened at the last ones from the previous imagined dialogue. Keep these consistent.

Ah, now I finally get some of the purpose behind the diary. I still find it odd that Rarity's so scattershot about whether her entries address Applejack, some unspecified future reader, or herself.

>she wondered how much longer she could prolong it for//

That "for" is extraneous.

>all the passive-aggression she could spare//

Seems really odd for her to do this deliberately and acknowledge such after very pointedly and unflatteringly describing the couple on the coach the same way.

>Exhausted, Rarity's simper dropped.//

A classic dangling participle. Presumably, Rarity's exhausted, but this says her simper is.

>orange…!//

Between dashes and ellipses, question marks and exclamation marks, this is the combo that really doesn't work. How do you trail off emphatically?

Alright, this stallion's dialogue is getting really talking heads. He's got line after line of dialogue, interspersed with Rarity's thoughts, but it's been so long since I got a visual of either of them that I still have them locked in the same positions. Don't lose track of setting the scene.

>She leaned towards him, her gaze steeled -//

I don't get what that dash is doing. You haven't punctuated or capitalized this like an aside.

>("Seventeen," he protested weakly, but she continued unabated - )//

I don't see what would be lost by making this a separate paragraph.

>fully-formed//

When the first word of such a phrase is an -ly adverb, you don't need the hyphen.

>saying, "the//

>I said "why//
Inconsistent at putting the comma between the speech and attribution, and you haven't capitalized either piece of dialogue.

>caricature!, it//

I don't get why she'd punctuate/capitalize it this way. Yeah, yeah, authorial license and all that, but it really looks contrived and planned that way, not something scribbled extemporaneously.

>"what in heaven's name are you wearing?"//

Capitalization. And what do the parentheses add that going without wouldn't accomplish?

>Then - "I need a drink."//

This format is just odd. The quote isn't interrupting or sidetracking the narration at all.

>"What'll it— oh! Well, you're a new face," she smiled.//

How does one "smile" a sentence? It's not even a transitive verb.

>inaudible reply//

Your narrator's in Rarity's perspective, so this is a strange judgment for her to make. Isn't it audible to her? If not, it must be deliberately so, which bears mentioning.

>and..." her eyes scanned a menu - "a//

Aside format again.

>she leaned thoughtfully on her hoof//

That's not a speech attribution, though you've punctuated it as one.

>all!,"//

Doubling up on the punctuation there.

>um," she glanced around at her surroundings, "love//

You're doing that thing again.

>tritely-decorated//

No hyphen.

>Rarity could feel the silence creeping up on her, she floundered, "but//

Comma splice, lack of speaking verb, capitalization.

>half-expected//

A bit soon after the last usage of this phrase. It still sticks in my head that I saw it recently.

>places; only the spaces between, this quiet, momentous, crushing…//

You definitely have some unusual instances of semicolons in the story. You frequently follow them with conjunctions, which you don't really see much in modern fiction. But I can't call this one correctly used. What comes after it doesn't approach having an independent clause.

Here, I'll wedge in a comment to say that the story isn't really drawing me into Rarity and Applejack's relationship. I trust that it eventually will fill in some reasons why I should care about it, but so far, I'm just getting some vague reassurances from the narration that it's a big deal and five lines every thousand words or so to tease at it. But there's really nothing here to build it up for me. I don't have much of a reason so far to be invested in its success, because I don't even really know what it is yet. And even if I do trust you to get there eventually, I'm 15k words in, and I still don't know. You can't string readers along forever, or they'll give up and leave.

>you want me to stop?

Capitalization.

Hm. AJ using profanity like that is really off-putting. For one, you haven't created the kind of atmosphere in the story where it seems like anyone would, but when there's nothing for the first 15k words, and suddenly AJ's dropping f-bombs, it's rather jarring. Not that one instance breaks any rules, but it's such a sudden shift of expectations that I can't imagine it's benefiting the story in any way. And then Rarity. Plot twists are fine, tone twists are risky, and maturity-level twists are just asking for trouble, especially on the upward side.

>It was just her//

Grammatically, "It was just she," but inasmuch as it's a limited narration, that's your call as to whether Rarity knows that or would be prone to using it.

And one more editorial comment after the fact. It strikes me as odd that the stallion on the coach is named Present Perfect, since he doesn't know anything about writing, while it's Evergreen who is a poet, though possibly a self-styled one, from Rarity's reaction, if I can trust her to be a good judge of such things.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 951

>>950
>shoddily-written/
No hyphen.

>but—“ she tapped a hoof on the wooden floor - “it’s//

Broken smart quotes, aside format, and dash consistency.

>I don't—“//

Broken smart quotes.

>I don't want to die here.//

I don't get her angst over this at all. It;s not like she's in any peril. If the townspeople stary worrying then there's real trouble, but if the ones who know the weather and lifestyle up there aren't unsettled, why her? It comes across as fairly artificial and forced.

>Worry creased his brows//

You haven't been guilty of using telling very much in the story. Where you have used it, it's usually fit the situation. But here, it does feel like his warming up to her is a solid point to make, so it'd probably work better to show this through his body language instead of directly naming it as worry.

>His gaze fell downwards, shifted and blinked in thought//

His gaze blinked?

>“...”//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but in real writing, it's just lazy. It tells me nothing about how the character feels. There are a whole lot of emotions that could make her pause here, and they'd have very different meanings to their relationship, but you're shoving that work onto the reader.

>down to his little dock that branched off about halfway down//

Watch that close repetition.

>It was a small village and it wasn’t hard to find him.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>knowing—“//

Broken smart quotes.

>isles - ” he leaned conspiratorially towards her - “and//

Aside formatting.

>She wondered by what metric this evening could be considered fine.//

I may have already mentioned something like this, but in a narration this subjective, it's not necessary to tell me a character wondered, thought, wished, wanted, hoped anything, because the narrator can simply do it for her. Just have the narrator ask the question, and it avoids forcing that distance between the character and reader.

>He winked eagerly - "Shall we?"//

That weird format again.

>as he lead her along the pathway//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>Now then," he cleared his throat.//

That's not a speaking action.

>the sun is unavoidable!,//

Doubling up on the punctuation.

>"Like I said, Miss Rarity," Pappy leaned over the basket, "there's//

Not a speaking action, but it's punctuated as one.

>‘em//

That's another thing that often breaks smart quotes: They get leading apostrophes backward.

>Pappy spoke in a reverent hush - "Don't//

Weird format.

>He trailed off//

You don't need to narrate trailing off when it's already apparent from the punctuation.

>she choked halfway through the word.//

Capitalization. It doesn't really count as an aside if you're not breaking back into the speech.

>As she tried to regain control of herself, Rarity would glance up at him to read his expression//

The use of "would" here makes it seem like this happens multiple times, but the timeline doesn't seem to follow that, as Pappy's actions only occur once.

I'll break out here a minute to say this is a little on the maudlin side. For tragic circumstances, less is often more. At least you didn't dwell on it, but that raises another problem. Rarity's crying "harder than she'd ever cried before," but it all passes so quickly that it sure doesn't seem to take very long for her to recover. So for one thing, that undercuts how upset she actually is. For another, it's pretty over the top to have a character actually bawling her eyes out. Think of how a real person would act in this situation. Rarity's with someone she barely knows. She'd probably try to control herself, not just leave everything open. And she's had some time to come to terms with this. Why was she so tightly controlled up until now? This guy is nothing to her. She's never even met him before. We'll see how this plays out, but I'll probably have more to say at the end.

>9th//

Spell out numbers this short.

>They told me not to," she got to her hooves, "but you deserve to know//

Not a speaking action, but punctuated as one.

>I don't know what you did to that family to make you good as dead in their books, but gods above, you deserve to know this at least.//

And I'm hoping you explain this as well. If she doesn't know this stallion at all, why is it so important for her to deliver this news in person? She has the address, Applejack's told her not to go, and Applejack is the only one invested in that relationship anyway. So what's the motivation to go to all that trouble?

>Like her mother.//

Rarity's never indicated she knew anything about Applejack's mom, and canon's no help there. This is kind of coming out of nowhere.

>Pappy closed his own eyes, conjuring her image.//

How does Rarity know this is what he's doing? It smacks of jumping into his perspective.

>That I could pass her on to you and be done with it all?//

I'm still not sold on why she'd even think this would be the case. By all accounts, Applejack was far closer to her many friends than to her grandfather, so why not pass AJ to them? She's left not only AJ behind, but everyone in Ponyville, as she continually ponders not returning, so it seems she's already doing something to this end. Why him, then?

>'Course//

There's no need for an apostrophe on this word. You're not eliminating any letters from it, just skipping the "of."

>her friend had joked, "am I really that bad-looking?," and//

Capitalization and double punctuation.

>freshly sharpened pencil and thoughtfully furrowed brow, penning these very words//

So she's penning... with a pencil.

Finally, at the end. Lest you think I don't like the story, know that I spent five full evenings reading and compiling notes on it. And in the end, no, I didn't like it, but that's immaterial, since I thought it was good, so it shouldn't matter whether I liked it. I do have some issues, though, that I'd point out in either case.

There are some consistent mechanical things. I didn't point out every instance of each, just enough to let you know what to look for. So to sum up, I saw a lot of inconsistency in dash and quotation mark styles, errors in how to place dashes for an aside, use of hyphens where dashes are needed, using non-speaking actions as dialogue attributions, and this weird format of transitioning from a non-aside narrative to a quote with a dash.

Next, the profanity really threw me for a loop. Rarity adopts such a thoughtful, verbose, and sophisticated style that it just feels really out of place for her. As I already pointed out, it's also a serious tone change, as such language doesn't even see its first use until well after the halfway mark. If she's going to use that kind of language, better to establish so early on than spring it on the reader this far in. I could buy it a little more from Soul Searcher, but even then, it wasn't really integral, though I suppose Rarity's lack of a reaction to it does strengthen her later use of it a bit. Frankly, I don't see that it's necessary for the story at all, but as long as it's tastefully infrequent, it's not breaking any rules.

Rarity's reaction to finally speaking with Pappy did run a little on the maudlin side, which I've already mentioned. It's nice that we did get to see her talking things out with him, but the height of her turmoil was glossed over, just having her cry without being able to speak. But that's all we really saw of it. Right here, when everything's bubbling up inside her (and it's a very limited narrator, so we should be treated to a front-row seat of it) is when we get pushed to a rather external viewpoint of it. Having her react this extremely does tend to be weaker than otherwise. Not that the emotion isn't there, but as I also said earlier, she's had time to process it already, and she never indicates that she's been avoiding such.

The diary's purpose does become clear in time, but in the early going it vacillates between being written to Applejack, herself, and some unspecified future reader. Yet she doesn't change her attitude toward it at all as the story goes back and forth between live action and the diary entries. Maybe she's sorting out for herself what she wants it to be, but as much time as we spend in her head, shouldn't that become apparent? It's another instance of a disconnect between there being evidence of something in her actions but that she never touches on in her thoughts. Even at the end, it's not apparent what her intent is for it. She's glad that she's had it, but has it served her needs to completion now? Will she still use it? Does she intend to share it with anyone? These aren't questions I'd normally say require an answer, but as big a deal as you make of it, I think it could use some resolution, or it feels more like a dropped plot point.

One big danger you'll run into is that readers will spot exactly what's going on at the beginning of the story. I'd immediately narrowed it down to one of two possibilities, and I'll grant you that I couldn't tell which one of the two was true until she outright told Pappy that Applejack was dead. But when you put off a reveal like this and play coy with it for so long, and the twist isn't something very specific where the details make all the difference, then it can make the middle part of the story boring for readers that called it early on. I don't think it's one of those stories where it'd do any harm to state it up front, but that's your risk to take.

I do want to talk some about character motivations, though, some of which will be rehashing things I already said, because that's what hurt my investment in the story the most. This kind of story is really up my alley. Even when I can tell a sad story is poorly written, I often get suckered into them. I still turn them away, but it's not very hard for them to affect me emotionally.

So, Applejack's motivation. I spent much of the story thinking that they'd grown apart and that Rarity had decided to leave her. The big problem with her is that she's almost entirely off camera. The biggest way to sell a reader on a relationship is to see it develop, which is the most common phase of one to tackle. The next best way is to exhibit the relationship as a complete, matured thing and demonstrate how the two characters really mesh as a couple, just interacting, showing great familiarity, and doing all the little things that couples do. There's precious little of that here, and much of it is just Rarity summing up that she was very much in love, but as they say, a example is worth a thousand generalities, and we get very little in the way of pictures here, scenes in which I get taken through some interaction of theirs and see it play out in my head. It's a tough sell to get the reader invested in their relationship when we see so little of it. Now, I'll grant you that there's a nice slow burn going on whereby Rarity is just so affected by things, and she acts not quite right the whole time (for that matter, we didn't really get a closure to the accusation she makes at the end of chapter 1). So that makes up for it some—I get someone obviously in a bad emotional place, and it goes on for so long that she's clearly very profoundly affected by it. I just fear that you've taken the more difficult road on several choices, and it starts to add up. Again, this is the kind of story that should easily have me wiping my eyes dry and trying to keep my wife from seeing. But I didn't actually find it that sad, and I think this is why.

But I've rambled. There's a rudimentary setup here, but it's glossed over so quickly that it doesn't carry as much weight. I don't really know why Applejack's so opposed to having anything to do with her grandfather. She never says. He volunteers some info, but it's nothing particularly damning, and Applejack never actually seems angry about any of it. Given my dichotomy over why Rarity was leaving, I thought she was asking Rarity not to go because she didn't want to give up on their relationship. Now I still have a bit of a quandary: I suspect Applejack was still trying to impose that exile and didn't want Rarity going to see him because it would validate him as a family member. But I could also take it that Rarity felt it so urgent to leave that she wanted to make contact before Applejack died, but that AJ didn't last until Rarity could return, in fact suspecting that would be the case, thus wanting Rarity to stay by her side until she'd passed. That's still kind of ambiguous. The latter might even be stronger play, since the story never had any direct animosity on Applejack's part toward her grandfather, so I don't get any motivation from her about why she'd try to keep Rarity from going.

On to Rarity, then. Her motivation is just as mysterious. Applejack's either remaining silent about Pappy or actively trying to prevent Rarity from going, so why would she? She never presents an argument that Pappy meant anything to her; indeed, every single bit of story points to the fact that he means exactly zero to her. So is she taking on a self-appointed mission to heal a family rift? The family apparently already has letter from him that they haven't cared to answer, so what about all this is likely to change that one jot? And so if not for the Apples' sake, what benefit does Rarity get from it? She doesn;t present one, and as bad as it is to ask the reader to invent something that major for you, I can't even come up with a good reason myself that fits any subtle clues in the story.

And those major points all simply come back to reader investment. I'm having trouble attaching much importance to what happens because I don't have a sense of why Rarity and Applejack were so important to each other or why either one of them took such a hard stance on the issue of contacting Pappy. The writing itself? Very good. I wish I could write like that, where sentences run on, but with grace and flourishes instead of beating the reader over the head with information. The way it feels much chorter than it actually is, the way it weaves in a fancy speaking style with advanced vocabulary, and you actually picked a character that such a style will support (you'd be surprised how many authors try this style with Rainbow Dash as a perspective character, for instance). Where it falls short is drawing me into the characters' direction really. Not their voices—Rarity has a wonderful one here—but really making the relationship, the conflict, and their reasons for the actions they take come alive.

Maybe that's why I didn't like the story, and maybe it's not. But I thought it was good. I think it needs to be better on those fronts, though, and even if that still doesn't make me like it, I can still recognize skilled writing and divorce personal taste from an evaluation of it. I'd be prepared to post it on the blog anyway.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 952

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>There was a bit of queasiness in her belly; though she could have easily blamed her unsettled stomach on the constant rocking from the weathered tracks below, she knew that the train was not to blame at all. It wasn’t a sick sort of upset stomach, but rather a nervous one. She was all too familiar with the feeling, having felt the butterflies every time she was anxious since she was a filly. Ahead in Ponyville lay the source of her nerves: A job.//

You've said the same thing a couple times now. We get the picture: she's nervous. Rather than just saying so, demonstrate it. What sort of doubts are running through her head? If you want to use a limited narrator (I'm not far enough in yet to see if you are), you can simply have the narrator state these for her. And give me more about the physical symptoms. I see nausea, but that's it, Is her skin jittery? Is she fidgeting? Does she keep checking the time every couple of minutes? There are lots of more subtle ways of getting this across than outright saying it. And note that you only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>two-dozen//

>right-side//
No reason to hyphenate these.

>a stallions voice//

Typo.

>“All aboard!”.//

Doubled end punctuation.

>work. He//

Several extraneous spaces.

>partly out of joy and partly to get him to quit throwing up a line of excuses//

Beware over-explaining a character's emotion or her reasons for doing something. These can often be subtly implied instead of stated outright, and that makes it more engaging. It's the difference between saying that someons was happy and that he smiled, for a simple example. On the emotion side, things to watch out for are using them directly as adjectives (sad), adverbs (happily), and in prepositional phrases (in excitement).

>high pitched//

Now that one does need a hyphen.

>“That’s the first thing I’ve ever seen her get wrong about anyone,” thought Cheerilee.//

You're generally going to quote thoughts and tag them as such or put them in italics, not both.

>side.“I//

Missing space.

>took a few steps forward, taking //

Watch that close repetition of words.

>as she talked//

That's pretty ungainly and self-explanatory.

>giving a smirk//

That's pretty much identical to the phrasing you just used in the previous paragraph.

>the last of her classroom preparations were made//

I don't see the advantage of passive voice here.

By now, I'm noticing a ton of "to be" verbs early on in this chapter. Maybe they were present in the last chapter, too, but I wasn't paying as much attention to it. These are inherently boring verbs. You'd do well to keep things more active where possible. You have 48 instances of "was" alone in this chapter, for instance. Of the forms I'll normally search, there are 92. That's almost one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen.

>Her hooves made muted thumps on the wooden deck as she crossed to the door.//

You just used an "as" clause in the last sentence. You'll want to avoid structural repetition like this, too.

>RRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIING!//

It's preferred to keep sound effects out of narration like this. Just describe the sound.

>her nose//

Extraneous space. And I hope you won't have them act this way to her indefinitely. They're respectful toward her in canon.

>next to Sweetie Belle//

How does she know who Sweetie Belle is yet? You haven't mentioned her before. It'd be ungainly to call them all by description and say that she asks each of them, so it's probably easier just to say she's got the seating chart made already from the registration info. I mean, it's reasonable she would have known who Sweetie was from her time before going to college, but she probably wouldn't know them all, and this is a good way to get her there.

>payed//

paid

>toss it to whoever you want//

Whomever, if you think Cherilee knows that.

>kept travelling around the room, Cheerilee kept//

Watch that repetition.

>day, there wasn’t any true instruction, and the day//

Same.

>activities to acclimate the foals to school and get to know them better//

So list a few. A couple of examples are worth a thousand generalities.

>day, so Cheerilee wasn’t far behind the children in leaving when they released for the day//

More close repetition, and of that same word, to boot.

>She was going to have to remember to stop by there soon.//

That's a pretty bland fact. Show her imagining a back rub or a sauna or something. Demonstrate how she feels instead of just saying it.

>she also ran into several ponies that she knew//

So let me see some of these interactions. There's an awful lot of narrative summary in the story already, and it at least made sense in the prologue, but here, it's a bit much. It'd add to her characterization and make this come alive if you'd show this as it happens.

>Cheerilee’s parents lived in a house much like any other in Ponyville; a two story timber frame house with a thatched roof.//

Two-story. And the semicolon is misused; what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence. You're clarifying a point, so a colon would work.

>two-story//

Well, you got the hyphen right this time, but you just used that term in the same paragraph.

>times— the exact number her mother insisted on as proper —and//

Don't put spaces on either end of an em dash.

>was followed//

I don't see the advantage of passive voice here, either. For one, using it costs you a "to be" verb, but it also shifts focus onto something unimportant here.

>a bespectacled primrose Earth Pony mare, very similar to Cheerilee’s own color but a bit darker. Her graying mane was tied back, and a red-stained apron hung from her neck.//

The way this is phrased, it sounds like Cheerilee wouldn't already know what she looked like, but of course she does. Present it less like new facts and more like seeing something familiar.

>Though she looked overwhelmed//

And what does that look like? Paint a picture for me without using the word, just the basics of her appearance and behavior, so that you lead me to conclude she's overwhelmed.

>what looked to be chocolate cake batter, and the oven was already in use making what looked//

Watch that repetition again.

>‘Ho are ‘hey?//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You'll have to force it.

>her mother reprimanded, giving Cheerilee the stink eye//

Look how often you use this structure of tacking a participial phrase on the end of a speaking attribution. Your last three in a row do this. You don't always put attributions on speech, but when you do, every one in the chapter uses this structure up until the "Cheerilee deadpanned" one. And then you go right back to it.

>I don’t know what he’s doing right now but he should be around here somewhere//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>I’ll bet he’s out in the shop; probably building a cabinet or somethin’//

Misused semicolon.

>speculated//

Alright, you're starting to get a little too creative with the speaking verbs. For the most part, you want them to blend in. More exotic ones are fine once in a while when they really change how you hear the speech or for a little variety, but too much, and it starts drawing attention away from the speech.

>utensils; fetching//

Extraneous space.

>it’s place setting//

Its/it's confusion.

>found herself wanting to try the new dish first//

Very dry and factual. What appeals to her about it? Does it smell good? Does it make her mouth water? Does she know from past experience that Cookie is a good chef?

>tabouli//

Wow, how is she not getting huge hits of parsley, mint, and garlic from that?

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>there grand adventure//

Their/there confusion.

>Hondo was again interrupted by Cookie’s elbow impacting his ribs.//

By now, it's obvious what happened, plus this is a lengthy description of a very quick action, so there's a pacing mismatch. Again, you're focusing more on the facts of what happens, and less on how Cheerilee feels about any of it. The story's about her, so show me her experience of it.

>by then, so I should be able to tell you better about how she’s doing by then//

Repetition. And now that I know how close these families are, how is she not already acquainted with Sweetie Belle?

>She wasn’t here to worry about what lay ahead, after all there was plenty of time for that later.//

Comma splice.

>the first door on that side; the bathroom//

Use a colon here.

>she turned and went down the stair. Once back in the foyer, she turned right to enter the kitchen//

Besides the repetition of turned, that's just so mechanical and bland. And does this level of detail really even matter?

>She picked the box up and placed it back on top of the stack. The box had been mostly filled with books, so it wouldn’t be too hard to pick it up.//

Repetition.

>Parent-Teacher//

Why is that capitalized?

>Come on Diamond//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Rumble brought his brother to the conference despite the fact that he needed his parents to attend, things went a bit farther south when she caught Thunderlane staring at her more than once.//

Comma splice.

>far-and-away//

No need to hyphenate that.

>The clock on the wall chimed as it struck ten, and Cheerilee rose enthusiastically as it signalled for her to finally go home.//

Repetitive to have the two "as" clauses in there. Then you have another in the next sentence.

>As she stepped through the doorway, she stopped and turned to click the lights off. As she went to flip the switch, she took a look around the room//

And then more, in consecutive sentences again.

>spick-and-span//

No hyphens. And it's "spic." The other is an unfortunate racial slur.

>payed//

paid

So this is a pretty good story. There are just a lot of recurring little problems that crop up, like the amount of repetition and the lack of emotional context for Cheerilee's narration. Furthermore, you're just getting to the story;s core conflict, so I'd like to see some more of the story when you're ready to resubmit. I'd want to read through how that's handled.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 955

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>clapped//

You use this word twice within the first couple paragraphs. The beginning is not the place to make your story sound repetitive.

>they can’t sell it the fancy stores//

Missing word.

>with pleasant surprise//

For one, that's oddly phrased, but for another, you generally don't want to identify emotions directly like this. Without using either word, describe how she looks and acts so that I'll infer what you want about her mood.

>grin of warm satisfaction//

There you go again. This kind, where the emotion is stated in a prepositional phrase, is particularly insidious. You're telling the reader how he should feel about it. Guide him to feel that way, don't force him.

>... Yeah.//

Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis.

>her mind bouncing back to Sunset’s earlier statement//

This is definitively in Twilight's head. No other character could possibly know this. Then just a few sentences later, we get this:
>Noticing the immediate concern growing on Twilight’s face//
Likewise, but for Sunset. Nobody else could know this, so you've skipped from Twilight's perspective to Sunset's. It's a bad idea to skip around too often or too suddenly, so keep an eye on your narration. Stay on top of who's holding the camera and whether the narration presents information she could know, and that it presents it as her perception of it if it would be presumed as someone else. It's better to keep a stable viewpoint, for a while, anyway. It needs to be carefully considered before executing a shift of perspective.

>The feeling of warmth was accented further by portable gas heating lamps which had been stood up at intervals along the park’s walkways.//

That's a lot of passive voice.

>Sunset smiled again//

The vast majority of your body language amounts to smiles and grins. People do other things, too. Just picture in your head all the little things that go on. A detail catches Twilight's eye, Sunset waves her hand a certain way. These are the kinds of things that really bring a scene alive.

>annoyedly//

And emotions as adverbs are just as insidious as the prepositional phrases. Paint me a picture of an annoyed girl. Don't just say she's annoyed.

>After swallowing, they narrowed again.//

Dangling participle. She's presumably the one who swallowed, but she doesn't appear in the sentence. This explicitly says that her eyes swallowed.

>‘Third booth on the left!”//

Opening quote is a single.

>“We’ll save a seat for ya.” Applejack called//

Punctuation.

There's a little bit of work you're asking the reader to do for you so far. Seeing the Dazzlings all chummy with everyone is kind of glossed over. It's probably too much to start the story earlier, where they all become friends, but you're trying to sell me on their friendship just by having them hug and smile and be best buddies. But there's not much evidence as to why they're friends or why they care that much about each other, apart from some vague statements Adagio makes. You really have to be careful asking the reader to take the narrator's word for something. A demonstration is far more valuable that an expository declaration.

>clip-clop’d//

That's really awkward.

>“I’m so sorry, Sunset,” Celestia choked through the tears, and then whispered again, “I’m sorry.”//

This is awfully maudlin. Where high emotion prevails, less is often more.

>In all of her years growing close with Celestia, she had never seen or heard her cry like this. Twilight thought back to her youth and to her time spent studying under Celestia in Canterlot. She imagined a young Sunset Shimmer in her place, experiencing all of the wonder, all of the joy and curiosity, and the bright hope for the future.//

This should be a big emotional moment for Twilight, but look how factual her narration sounds about it all. This has been probably the biggest issue throughout the story. There's so little emotion attached to the events.

>wing tip//

wingtip

Okay, I still think the issue is that the limited narration is awfully wooden, but the amount of telly language is also going to create that sense. That and the lack of context to Sunset's sudden close relationship with Adagio are what's hurting this the most. In keeping things from getting too maudlin, compare Celestia's section of the story to the one where Twilight gives Sunset the letter. Sunset does break down sobbing, too, which is also probably too much, but there's a lot of good stuff there about her body language, trying to control her reaction... it's all understated, which is a whole lot more powerful than being explicit. If you can present emotion the same way throughout the story, then you'll be on the right track.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 956

>>951
Thanks so much for this! I appreciate all the time you spent criticising a MLP fanfiction, lord knows you could've been spending your time doing better things. And what a thorough roasting this is. I'm an arrogant writer (what a tautology) and I will defend a lot of my grammatical idiosyncrasies that you didn't like to the bitter end, but I always knew that they would put a lot of people off, so no butthurt. Your points about character and tone are very insightful.

Some feeble counterpoints: Evergreen was the kid on the coach and Present Perfect was his terrible poet boyfriend; Rarity's breakdown in the (totally) maudlin climax is because she's spent so much time deliberately trying *not* to process her grief, and it all comes out at last; and it was Big Mac, not Applejack, who didn't want Rarity to go. AJ had secretly kept all of Pappy's letters, leading Rarity to think that he still meant something to her, hence she wanted to go tell him. I wanted to keep this "backstory" vague and let readers interpret what they will (eg. why Pappy is no longer accepted by the Apples - I can tell you what *I* think he did, but your own idea might be way cooler), but I realise that in keeping it vague I've made a lot of these details easy to miss . 'Vague' is maybe the best way to describe my goal in general - a lot of my weird punctuation and voice shifts were designed to give a loose, floaty feel, if that makes any kind of sense. More poetic than prosaic, maybe? Sorry about the quote marks though, that wasn't intentional. Blame GDocs. >_>

Anyhoo, tl;dr - I made a lot of weird mistakes 'cause I thought they were cool and in 10 years' time I'll look back on this and shake my head and laugh and say, "oh, what a fool I was." Thanks again, maybe see you 'round at the next fic review!

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 957

>>955
All good/valuable feedback, thanks. Don't have anything to counter, as I agree with your points. I'll have another read through this lens and see what changes come to mind.

Regarding the Dazzlings' progress, I've been a bit torn with wanting to flag this as a sequel to my first fic, An Open Door. On one hand, the background development you're thinking of happens there. But on the other hand, that story suffers from more 'novice writing' issues than this one (imo, looking back), and is twice the length.

With those thoughts in mind, the approach I took was the make note of the Dazzlings' progress in this story's description, along with a note to check out 'Door if the reader was curious about how it developed.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 960

>>957
One danger of basically requiring the reader to know information from a previous story to understand the current one is that we won't post stories like that. Any required reading must already be on Equestria Daily, so if you do take the route of officially making this a sequel, then you'd need to submit the original story, then post this one as an update.

Jack_mahoffCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 961

>>952
Hopefully this is how you reply to the thread.

Thanks for the review! I'm sorry that I haven't gotten back to you sooner, but real life is a bit of a pain in the butt.

The biggest thing I took away from this is that I need to work on not repeating myself so much. I will be taking steps to fix these issues that you pointed out and further improve the story as I go ahead. Hopefully I will be resubmitting in the near future!

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 962

>>960
Makes sense. I might end up doing so after another pass through that first story to apply some of the feedback from here.

Though generally speaking, what I wouldn't give for this same sort of critical feedback on my other two stories as well. (Especially the sequel to Messenger, if you're ever "in the neighborhood" and not swamped with EQD pre-reading. Doubtful, but worth the invitation, I figure. ;) Thanks again.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 963

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'm seeing quite a few "to be" verbs in the early going. It's impractical to eliminate it altogether from a story, but it's best to keep things as active as possible, particularly near the beginning, where you want to grab the reader's interest.

>rest of her friends. “What about the rest of you?”//

Watch out for repetitive phrasing and word use like this.

>Twilight appeared uncertain//

So far, it looks like you're using an omniscient narrator. He doesn't adopt a conversational style, he doesn't speak character's thoughts for them, and he skips around to different viewpoints. So whose opinion is this? An omniscient narrator would know whether she was uncertain; appearance wouldn't enter into it.

>look of glee//

Rather than tell me it was glee, describe how her face looks and let me infer the glee. Reading's more interesting when emotion comes from the context instead of direct language.

>to the great deserts that lie that way//

You're telling the story in past tense, so why switch to present here?

>For in the deserts of her home//

Your previous sentence ended in a "for" clause so beginning the next sentence with one feels repetitive.

>rest. With the rest//

I know they're meant in different sense, but this is still close repetition.

>for her view was blocked by the great tree that stood in the centre of the garden//

I don't see the benefit of passive voice here, and though the actual fable started off well, it's starting to drown in "to be" verbs. You do get a bit of a pass for the fable style, but there's a limit. I'll revisit this at the end and see how it averages out.

>When she spoke//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>including myself//

That's not really the proper use of a reflexive pronoun; they must refer to the same person or thing that serves as the clause's subject. Just use "me."

>he despairs at his lack of a companion//

You just referred to despair a couple sentences ago. There could actually be a thematic repetition here, in that she's linking their two situations, but then the trick is to make sure the repetition comes across as deliberate, like using it yet another time, emphasizing it, or using words like "too," "again," "his own despair," or some such to call attention to it.

>coming from an insect//

A scorpion isn't an insect...

>But if it’s love that you’re after, it seems that I ought to help you out.//

That's an awfully large leap for him to make. What's his motivation to help her, particularly since it's very presumptive for him to do something that'd have that big an effect on his king, for whom he directly serves as a trusted adviser. Not that it can't be explained, but one isn't presented here. I see you do get to this later, at least from his side, but it seems obvious. Why wouldn't she have thought of it?

>and when she looked down//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>‘Ang//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can type two in a row and delete the first or paste one in.

>His eyes were sly//

Repetitive with her recent "sly chuckle."

>and when she awoke//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>Antares left, and climbed back up through the castle toward her chamber//

This is all one clause, so there's no need for the comma.

>Once there, she went right to the window, and looked over the starlit grounds.//

Same thing.

It's occurring to me that she never tried finding a different part of the garden for her nest. It wouldn't be hard to say that she did try and couldn't find anywhere suitable.

>As an insect//

She's not an insect!

>and as the wind whipped through her mane//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>But he did not look angry, instead he merely smiled a knowing grin.//

Comma splice.

>Even when her and Jupiter were together//

"She," not "her."

>when they worked within that tree’s vicinity//

Given that this is in the same sentences as the previous excerpt I flagged, you have two "when" clauses, which is repetitive and forms a fairly convoluted temporal dependency.

>she was ready to put her plan into action, and disappear once again from Jupiter’s life forever//

That's all one clause. It doesn't need the comma.

>just as she had thought it would be as she had planned it out//

Kind of repetitive and even a little confusing to have those two "as" clauses stacked up.

>it was another way to spite that tree which had caused her so much grief//

This is stretching credibility a bit. It's not like the tree is sentient. Her position would have no effect on it beyond using her influence to get rid of it, which was her original intent anyway, so why isn't she thinking toward that end? Whether to set her plan in motion or reconsider it, she should be staying a little more on topic.

>as her and Jupiter had drawn close//

as she and Jupiter

>but now it seemed that she had walked right into his trap//

Not really. She knew exactly what she was getting into. He hasn't twisted it in any way. So why would she express it as such?

>He appointed to me a noble office//

He appointed me to

>Antares guessed that this was likely where she was going to come in.//

That's rather bluntly expository. Better to give that impression that state it outright.

>One taste of that fruit could restore my ailing powers, and allow me to save this kingdom from that idiot of a King.//

No need for a comma. As this is popping up here and there, I'll refer you to a brief explanation under the "comma use with conjunctions" heading at the top of this thread.

>in surprise//

Prepositional phrases that declare an emotion or attitude like this are really ungainly, and they're often redundant with something already in the sentence anyway, as is the case here.

>Give me a spell that can sap the tree’s life, and wither it away year after year//

No comma.

>Jupiter would have no choice but to turn to her, and accept her as his true love//

No comma.

>The next day, when her and Jupiter were out tending the garden//

"She and Jupiter." I suspect this will remain a problem going forward.

>she stole a glance up at the great tree, and noticed that indeed there were the beginnings of fruits growing upon its branches//

No comma.

>for I do not grow it for//

Watch that repetition.

>He always looked at his garden as though he wanted to stay there forever, and forget about the rest of the world//

No comma.

>His eyes here pleading her.//

Typo.

>She left the garden behind, and walked straight on up into the castle.//

No comma.

>hoof-steps//

That's likely be a single word like "footsteps."

>indicating trepidation//

You've already indicated trepidation through how he acted. When you then say it outright , it short-circuits all that subtlety.

>He took a tentative step forward, and smiled//

No comma.

>She rose his head up//

"Rose" is the past tense of "rise," which is intransitive. You need "raise," or "raised," in the past tense, for it to take a direct object.

>The day of the beginning of the harvest began early, though still after dawn//

Repetitive "beginning/began," and doesn't the day tart well before dawn?

>Her and Jupiter stood//

She. This is just a compound subject. Remove Jupiter from it to illustrate: Her stood. That's obviously wrong.

>we should take out some of our store, and celebrate again//

>She only looked into Jupiter’s eyes, and willed herself to remember the joyfulness of this moment//
No comma.

>And then he turned back to Antares, and embraced her lovingly. And she did the same to him.//

That's an awful lot of "and"s, especially when beginning a sentence with one is somewhat superfluous anyway.

>it will sap the plant’s energy, and waste it away to nothing//

>Antares did not have to look back to see the disgusting smile on his face, or the hate in his eyes.//
No comma.

>she realized now that though she still looked as beautiful as she did during the day, she walked now//

Watch that repetition.

>it wasn’t her that she remembered//

By proper grammar, "it wasn't she."

>someone else that loved him purely and openly, and didn’t have to worry//

No comma.

>that if she didn’t//

Comma after this to separate the dependent clause.

>envelope the branches//

envelop

>Finally, Antares allowed herself to release that solitary tear.//

The single tear is horribly cliched.

>Her and Jupiter went back to their normal routine//

Srsly, stop doing that.

>enjoying each other’s companies//

They're businessponies?

This chapter is absolutely awash in "to be" verbs. There are 115 instances of "was" alone. Do a Ctrl-f for it, and watch the screen light up. This is a horribly boring word to use. It's more interesting to read about things happening, not things that simply are. It's impractical to rid a story of it altogether, but you really need to be choosing more active verbs. I searched for other forms of the verb, too, and I counted 247. That's about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. You're also frequently using them as unnecessary auxiliary verbs, like "had been getting" versus "had gotten."

>she threw on a light coat, before making her way down to the ground floor//

No reason for that comma to be there.

>They know how much I detest all of that stuff//

With the grandiose and fanciful language this story uses, "stuff" doesn't really fit.

>This,” and he turned back to her, sweeping a foreleg out over all of the garden, “this//

Punctuating an aside like an attribution. When you break into a quote for a non-speaking action like this, here's how you do it:
This—” and he turned back to her, sweeping a foreleg out over all of the garden “—this

>Antares suddenly remembered Star Light, and what he had said about the King//

No need for that comma.

>Jupiter put his leg across her shoulders, and turned her around to look her in the eye.//

No comma.

>His eyes were entreating her, in honest confusion.//

This doesn't smack of fairy-tale telliness. It's the rather ordinary, boring kind. I've got three direct emotions pushed to me here, without evidence of any of them.

>Her voice now had a hard, interrogatory tone to it//

Same thing. There are times telling works, but in this kind of story, it's in conjunction with a whimsical style. You don't have that here.

>Antares detected sorrow there//

That's just an odd phrasing. What is it that she saw?

>and his voice trailed off//

Don't narrate trailing off or cutting off when you can already tell such from the punctuation.

>had not been kind, nor tender or caring//

Be consistent with using the "nor" throughout. You've mixed in an "or."

>but as she approached//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>Antares hid her fear, and let out the last of her anger, as hot tears of sorrow burned down her cheeks.//

None of those commas are necessary.

>Jupiter looked away, and exhaled deeply//

No comma.

>Antares, raised her eyes to see him//

Why in the world would that comma be there?

>She hated them, for their unbreakable hold on Jupiter’s heart.//

No comma. Same for the following two sentences.

>Jupiter, though, she could not hate, though//

Redundant instances of "though."

>it was him, not her//

it was she, not he

>insect//

She's not an insect!!

>that did nothing to lighten the mood//

That's an odd thing to say, as if that's what should have happened or what he might have intended.

>who owes me for everything, and who has helped me recover nearly all of my former power, now wants to hold it over me, like I owe it anything//

Pretty repetitive phrasing.

>once mighty//

Hyphenate.

>What difference did it make, whether it rained or not? Whether the Sun shone, or the clouds darkened the sky forever? Whether the world bloomed, or the plants died away in the soil//

None of those commas are needed.

>faceup//

Two words.

>nor was it her//

nor was it she

>If he were hearing her//

That's not quite the spot for subjunctive mood, but it's close. It's not hypothetical; it's a real possibility. I'd go with "was." Actually, I'd go with "if he heard," given my earlier rant about "to be" verbs.

>a scorpion who you scooped up//

whom

>resenting having been taken//

That's a horribly clunky verb cluster.

>had been waiting to be let out//

So's that.

>You were so attached to the plants of your garden, that I grew envious of them.//

"That" clauses are one of the exceptions; they rarely take commas as dependent clauses.

>he trailed off//

Don't narrate this when it's obvious from the punctuation.

>and maybe, she could exist even without a mare’s face//

No way there should be a comma there. It's not even a natural place for a pause.

>So, Antares planned.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be correct. This one isn't.

>She thought long and hard, about what she would now do//

No comma.

>She grabbed a cloak and a lantern from a passing guard, and set off into the darkness.//

No comma.

>in seclusion off on its own//

Redundant.

>Star Light had grown taller over the years, as his magic had grown more powerful inside him.//

"As" is another exception to the comma rule, sometimes. With a comma, it tends to create a meaning of "because," while without a comma, it tends to mean "at the same time that." You probably don't want one here.

>Even though she wasn’t really a unicorn//

This feels like a pointless interjection. Why would it matter? It seems closer to a justification than anything, but it really isn't necessary.

>She stole a look up at the moon, and noted its position over the horizon.//

No comma.

Okay, the first two chapters were quite a bit more polished than the last. And the story just stops. At least the fable comes to a conclusion, but the frame story doesn't. We've learned our lesson from the embedded tale, but what point do you want the reader taking from the frame? What do we learn about the characters through how they react to it? It needs a little more.

Really, the biggest issues here are more or less cosmetic, which is good news, since those are pretty easy to fix. The most common ones were comma issues, repetition, and overuse of "to be" verbs. And lastly, please note that a scorpion is not an insect!

Like I said, you've got all the difficult parts right, so I don't see any significant barriers to this story making the blog. It's good enough that I wouldn't need to give it a full read again on resubmission, so please choose the "back from Mars" option.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 967

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Apple Bloom was sitting at a desk in the corner of the clubhouse, looking over the small bit of weekend homework she had knocked out early.//

There's not really a purpose to having it in this verb tense. "To be" verbs are pretty boring, even as auxiliary verbs. Keep this active. You want to grab the reader's interest. The first line could use a better hook anyway, as this is pretty mundane.

>thwack

DOn't put sounds effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

>Walking back out onto the balcony, she shook herself dry as best she could//

Watch your participles. There are a few mistakes that writers commonly make with them. Note that a participle implies things happen at the same time, but she probably wouldn't shake herself while walking out there—she'd wait until after she got out there. You'll need to scan the story for these, where you've synchronized actions that shouldn't be. You do this a lot.

>As Scootaloo walked inside//

Watch close repetition. The previous sentence ended with "walk" as a verb as well.

>Apple Bloom said as she walked back over to the window//

There's an awful lot of walking going on.

>"Mmm," Apple Bloom nodded absently//

You've punctuated that like a dialogue attribution, but there's no speaking verb. You can't nod a sentence. This is another thing you need to scan for.

>the two began working together to brainstorm new ideas for getting their cutie marks. One would sit in the 'think-of-great-ideas' spot beneath the lantern, while the other would jot down notes at the desk. Every so often, they would swap places, trying to come up with ideas for the next week. While they did come up with a few things – like roof insulating – they realized they were getting nowhere fast.//

So let me see some of this. It's boring to get it as a glossed-over narration after the fact. This is good material for humor and characterization.

>Leaning back against the wall in defeat, Scootaloo let out a frustrated grunt//

You do a lot of this, too. Be sparing about directly identifying moods and emotions. It's better to imply them through the context of how a character appears and acts. The grunt already gets at frustration. You don't need the word. And "in defeat" doesn't create a mental image. something like slouching and drooping ears does.

>“You ready to turn in, Scoots?”//

At this line, you transition from having simple-style quotation marks to fancy ones. Make them consistent.

>'n//

'n'. You also do this one multiple times in the story.

>nuzzling gently into her pillow//

You're now running into another common problem with participles: overuse. They're fine for variety, but the stick out easily when they turn up too often, and you're using lots of them around here.

>Eventually, she realized this//

That's a rather external viewpoint, and one that doesn't jive with the close limited narrator you've been using.

>Apple Bloom lied beneath the moonlight//

Verb form. You're saying she's fibbing. You want "lay."

>letting the words trail off into silence//

You don't need to narrate that when it's apparent from the punctuation.

>Apple Bloom was afraid of pushing too far.//

Watch out for over-explaining a character's motives and intents like this. Keep in mind you have a limited narrator who can speak Apple Bloom's thoughts for her. Let it come through that way, not a blunt explanatory comment like this.

>and laid back down//

"Laid" takes a direct object. You want "lay."

>The two laid there together//

I see this verb is going to continue to be a problem. Here's the scoop:
"Lay" is transitive. It operates on something, which it takes as its direct object. "Lie" doesn't. So you lay your head down, but you lie down. Past tense gets tricky since the past of "lie" is "lay." It goes lay/laid/had laid, lie/lay/had lain.

>A slight warmth began to build in her eyes as she thought back to those times.//

You'd been telling the scene from Apple Bloom's perspective, but this is coming from Scootaloo's head. It's the kind of thing you don't need to be there to get across, though, so why not stay with Apple Bloom and show her perception of it?

>forlornly//

>confidently//
>curiously//
And look at all those adverbs. Make them act and appear these ways. Don't just tell me. This doesn't create an image.

>trying to catch their breaths//

Breath counts as a collective noun here. You don't need to make it plural.

>“No no,” Scootaloo shook her head adamantly, “It's fine.//

Non-speaking action punctuated like an attribution again. And the capitalization's off, since you've punctuated it like the quote is a continuous sentence across the break. Take a look and the short section on dialogue capitalization/punctuation at the top of this thread.

>... Well//

Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis.

So what I've listed about certainly isn't exhaustive. I just pulled out some examples so you'd know what to look for. You should probably also read the sections up top and show versus tell and head hopping. Apple Bloom's accent is written a bit thick, too. The reader knows what she sounds like, and he'll fill that it for you. It's more about word choice and phrasing with them that too many deliberate phonetic spellings that tend to slow reading down. Other than that, this was a nice, sweet story. If you can get these things fixed up, it could have a home on the blog.

Response to critique Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 969

>>967
Thank you for the critique – it was very much appreciated! It helped me to be able to comb through the story and easily identify the problems highlighted through example.

I will be finishing up revisions over the next few days to resubmit, but one question I have is whether or not you believe leaving the opening line as-is will cause a problem with blog eligibility. I have changed the verb tense, but Apple Bloom is still sitting there, looking over her homework. I understand the way you critiqued it, this may not be one of those black-and-white issues, so it might not be that big of a deal. In any case, I figured I would throw the question out there and see if you have any further input.

Thanks in advance!

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 971

>>955
I've addressed the feedback here, and the story itself on fimfic is updated. Would you prefer a full re-submit, or to just have another look over the story to verify? (since there was no strike here, just your recommendations)

I'm pretty happy with the chapter 2 modification to Twi's internal thoughts during the Celestia scene - moving from analytical to a bit more emotional.

And then regarding background for the Dazzlings' characterization, I really would prefer to leave this as a standalone story, and not a sequel to my other fic which covers that. To that end, I've added some background to the conversation between Twi and Sunset early in the first chapter. Given my closeness to this story though, I'll have to leave it to you to determine whether or not this is enough to address your concern. ;)

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 981

>>969
No, that first line isn't a deal-breaker, but I don't think it's doing you any favors. If you opened a story on FiMFiction and read that as the first line, would you find it interesting? It's just an everyday occurrence, and there's nothing to it that immediately sparks interest.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 982

>>971
You might as well do a full resubmit, as it wouldn't change how I approach it, and there's no chance of me forgetting to do it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 983

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Rainbow arched her face upward, smiling as the warm rays of the sun bounced off her face.//

Watch that close repetition of "face."

>A motley of colors//

That's a really odd use of "motley." It's rare to see it as a noun anyway, and even then, it accentuates that the different elements don't belong together, which isn't the case for her.

>mach cone//

"Mac" needs to be capitalized. And I suspect you're getting this terminology from that analysis done years ago to guess how fast Dash was moving in "Sonic Rainboom." It's actually not quite the right thing. Mach angles and shock angles are different things, and more readers will know what you're talking about anyway if you use something like "shockwave cone."

>The sudden change in direction dissipated the cone and she slowed her pace ever so slightly.//

You have this issue once in a while where you don't have a comma between clauses or have one separating a rather simple compound structure in a single clause. And changing direction wouldn't dissipate a shockwave. Only slowing down would.

>Finding a comfortable spot over the tops of the buildings she swooped through town.//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>view. She//

I don't really care whether people double-space after a sentence. I used to do that myself. But here's one of the problems it can cause: On my browser, it put the line break between the two spaces, so the new sentence looks indented.

>she saw Pinkie Pie standing not to far away//

To/too confusion.

>‘Cause//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in from somewhere else. It's worth scanning through the story to make sure you don't have any more of these.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

Per canon, Sugarcube.

>She waved her hoof at triple strength, creating a light breeze that cooled Rainbow off a little.//

As fast as Dash has been flying, I don't know that she'd notice the contrast of something that small.

>She paused.//

This is a common sentence to see in fanfiction, but it does nothing. I can't visualize what's happening. And what's more important than the pause is why she's pausing, which you don't get into at all. Show me what she does here, and let it indicate her mood.

>Pausing for a moment//

And watch out for using that word so soon again.

>pondering the question within the depths of her mind//

You've been telling the story from Dash's perspective so far, yet this is distinctly in Pinkie's mind, unless you add some phrasing to say that this is Dash's impression and not a known fact.

>in fact, if it was a physical thing, it would undoubtedly be worth its weight in gold, which would weigh a lot—so she couldn’t have it being dented by anypony.//

What does its weight have to do with being dented?

>“Okay,” Pinkie replied, keeping her tone as level and calm as possible, hoping to defuse the tension.//

There you go again, hopping into Pinkie's head. You need to keep a consistent perspective here. Either that or reconsider how many of them are actually necessary to convey information I couldn't have gotten otherwise, and you make them smoother. You should read the short section on head hopping at the top of this thread. On the other hand, if you want to convert the story to an omniscient narrator, it's more reasonable to jump between them. You'd just have to take out any personal voice from the narration, like times you adopt a conversational style, have the narrator express a character's thoughts without presenting it like a quote (either actually in quotes or italicized), have the narrator ask questions, etc.

>eyebrow rising in concern//

The "in concern" isn't necessary here, so it's already easy to infer her mood from her action. So it's pretty redundant, besides being telly. Have a look at the section on show versus tell at the top of the thread as well.

>Her wings folded down and pushed herself forward.//

A reflexive pronoun only works if it refers to the same things as the clause's subject, but here, the subject is her wings, not her.

>It was too late to question what had just happened, the finish line was approaching.//

Comma splice.

>monomer//

That's a really odd word choice. First, the only dictionary definition I see is a type of chemical compound. Second, while I'm guessing it has to do with the "nom" root in words like "nomenclature," it's an example of thesaurus abuse where there's no reason to go with the fanciest synonym possible, and the limited narration suggests either Dash or Pinkie would know the word and be inclined to use it.

>the perkiness behind her words feigned//

I haven't been pointing out all the bits of intrusive telly language, but this one warrants mention. It's pretty important to the moment's emotions for the reader to realize Pinkie isn't being genuine, but it disarms that and converts it to a cold fact when you feed the conclusion to the reader. How would someone act when they were faking? Present her as such and let me figure it out.

>Though, she had to admit it was getting harder and harder to keep up with Pinkie.//

There's rarely a good reason for having a comma after a conjunction.

Applejack's accent is a bit thick here. You don't want to make it a caricature or difficult to read. The reader already knows what she sounds like and will fill that in for you. her voice is more about word choice and phrasing than using imitative spellings.

>Applejack raised her eyebrow her line of sight falling on the scoreboard.//

You'll also normally set off an absolute phrase with a comma.

>The two of them tensed there muscles//

There/their confusion.

>Rainbow tore from the ground, snapping her wings out and taking the high skies. A half-second behind, Pinkie bounced along, humming a cheery tune.

>
>Climbing a little higher, Rainbow pushed faster, knowing she couldn’t afford to waste too much time trying to get a high altitude.//
Look how many participial phrases you use there. Four of them in just three sentences. I've noticed there are a decent number of them in the story, but it hadn't gotten bad until now. You don't want a lot of structural repetition like that. Participles are great for variety here and there, but they can stand out easily when overused. They're something that authors of moderate experience levels often abuse.

>Wind smack her face//

Verb form.

>She watched as the mach cone slanted and finessed into a point//

You can't see a Mach cone, though you can see a shockwave under the right conditions. Doesn't a cone come to a point by definition? Except it wouldn't for her, since she doesn't come to a perfect point, either. She'd have a bow shock, which gets at the differences between a Mach cone and a shock cone.

>She pulled up before becoming one with the ground, her cheeks flapping backward as she pulled up alongside Pinkie.//

Watch that repetition of "pulled up."

>the skidding stop//

Verb form.

>PInkie//

Typo.

>in an attempt to keep a more jovial mood//

It's a bad idea to spell out a character's motive instead of implying it. In fact, it's also usually a bad idea to tell me what a character knows by phrasing it explicitly (she knew that...), which you do in a number of places.

It's a pretty cute story, but it does have pretty persistent perspective problems and occasionally uses telly language at the wrong moments, as well as some technical problems that need to be cleaned up.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 984

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She had to give it to the crew, they had certainly outdone themselves putting together the right amount of contrasting colors while still portraying an aire of modern elegance.//

"Air" and that comma is a splice. A dash would work fine there.

>“Of course, Ziya,” she turned to face the reporter//

You have that punctuated like it's a dialogue attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>Even if//

When a quote goes across multiple paragraphs, you are correc that you don't end the intermediate ones with a closing quotation mark, but you do have to renew to opening ones with each new paragraph.

>Ziya began//

>Beginning with Nightmare Moon//
Watch using that same verb so close together.

>When Ziya did attempt to bring Rarity into the conversation, it took several prompts to get her attention.//

Given that you're using a limited narrator, this doesn't quite work. You're in Rarity's perspective, so the narrator shouldn't notice things that Rarity couldn't or didn't. There are ways to get this same information across without breaking perspective.

>“No, we can continue.”//

This gets a little talking heads (there's a section explaining this at the top of the thread) even though it's only a three-line exchange because Rarity's having an emotional response here, but we don't get any flavor for it. It's possible to communicate some of that through her speech, but you don't even do that.

>Yet, we weren’t taking on these challenges for fame and fortune.//

There's rarely a good reason to put a comma after a conjunction. This one doesn't work.

>Out of the corner of her eye she could just make out smiles from her friends, but she pushed herself to focus on the interview.//

But she doesn't sound distractes at all. If this were an omniscient narrator, that would be fine, but you're using a limited one who is essentially Rarity. If her mind wanders, why not have the narrator's mind wander, too? They're the same thing.

>And Equestria certainly thanks you, Celestia knows what would have happened to this country had it not been for you and your friends//

Comma splice.

>who’s encouraging smile//

whose

>9th//

Spell out numerical words this short.

>Fluttershy had gone to hide, her nerves were ever so frail//

Comma splice.

>Rarity bit the inside of her cheek, of course they wanted details.//

Comma splice.

>She closed her eyes against the guilt and sorrow that washed over her.

You'd done a fairly good job until now, but this is a very important emotion for the story, and yet you're glossing it over by drawring the conclusion for me. Let me know what she does, what she thinks, what physical sensations she has that would connote guilt and sorrow without your ever having to use those words or their synonyms. Ther's more of a discussion in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>and once I realized his intentions were less than noble//

This is a dependent clause, so you need commas on both ends.

>Ziya’s face devoid of her usual smile//

You're missing a verb.

>Grimacing, Rarity’s ears pressed back against her head//

Dangling participle. "Grimacing" is supposed to describe Rarity, but she doesn't even appear in the sentence. This says her ears grimaced.

>expensive port soaked into carpet//

Missing a "the."

>The red liquor//

Wine isn't really considered liquor. This sentence also has a comma splice.

>Rarity, who still hadn’t dried her face//

And her mascara's not running? That's usually the kind of thing that bothers her.

>She shook her head to clear her mind, and continued to survey the room.//

Here's the opposite case to one I noted before. That's all one clause, and it isn't complex, so you don't need the comma.

>panic-attack//

No need for that hyphen.

>“What happened?” She asked the intern.//

Capitalization.

>Once Rarity had climbed back into her chair//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>bordeaux//

Wait, you earlier referred to it as port. Those aren't the same thing.

>Rarity knew that once this was over with she wouldn’t have to do it again//

It's usually a bad idea to directly phrase something as what a character knew. It's a limited narration, so just by having the narrator say it, it's implied that Rarity knows.

>she would not allow one of her closest friends be slandered by the media//

Missing word.

>Rarity wished she hadn’t emptied her cup, but when she glanced at it was pleased to find it had been refilled//

Missing word(s).

>the shuffling came to a close//

That's a really awkward phrasing.

>I honestly had no idea what I was going to do when I reached the second floor, I just knew I had to get away from him.//

Comma splice.

>back, ending up pressed against the back//

Watch repeating a word in a close space like that.

>I- I//

If you're using an en dash, put spaces on both sides. For an em dash, don't use spaces.

>you!//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word, italicize it as well.

>You just didn’t want them to know that it was you who couldn’t stop me. That you killed me!//

This doesn't quite make sense. Wouldn't killing her be stopping her by definition? I think there's a finer shade of meaning you're going for here, but it needs to come out clearly.

>The cold, slimy feeling//

You already described it as slimy.

>I yelled at Sweetie to run away, to go to her friends//

How in the world did Sweetie Belle not tell anyone what had happened? Even if she was instructed not to (which I bet you'll get to in a moment), nobody, much less a child, is going to remain so composed after seeing this that it won't be obvious something's wrong.

>Her sobs grew so strong she had to stop speaking for a few moments.//

And here, at the emotional height of the story, the narrator is reduced to giving me facts. At least the sobs do connote how she's feeling, but it's a pretty generic picture. You're losing a lot of the moment's impact this way.

>it blew half your face off//

And that's not a defensive spell?

>Rarity couldn’t take it anymore, she leaned over the side of the chair and let loose the contents of her stomach//

Comma splice. And again, this is pretty bland. It's note doing much to get at her emotional state.

>She gave herself a few moments to breath//

Typo.

>But… but how could I tell them that you died like that.

Isn't that a question?

>Turning, Twilight came into view, unshed tears pooling in her eyes//

This says that Twilight was turning, but I bet you meant Rarity.

I have to say I don't understand the ending at all. Fluttershy is pretty much confirming that Rarity told the truth, so what are they going to charge Rarity with? Lying about it wouldn't be a big infraction, and she's told a story of self-defense which Sweetie Belle can corroborate, and you haven't indicated otherwise. If Rarity made that part up, it would be foolhardy to even say it, since Sweetie Belle will just deny it. Yet the story implies that Rarity's either going to be locked up as insane or charged with Fluttershy's murder, neither of which really seems to fit how these friends would treat each other. It takes a rather hopeless turn for no real reason, and that doesn't make much sense. And it doesn't draw a conclusion, either. Rarity has some relief for telling the truth, but what are the consequences? We don't know yet, no stakes have been identified, and at best, a couple of vague outcomes are implied that require the reader to do a whole lot of work for you, like deciding how Rarity's friends will end up reasoning through it all. The trick to an open ending is by implying the possible outcomes and investing each with emotional power and consequences, and you haven't done that here. The story more stops than comes to a conclusion, which leaves it pretty unsatisfying.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 985

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Had Fleur De Lis not known that voice so well//

You just used "voice" recently enough that you can probably get away with "it" or deflecting to something a little off from it like "the voice's owner."

>’Just means she hasn’t found anything to criticize yet.’//

Looks like you got caught in the middle on format. For thoughts, italics are enough.

>A long, slender foreleg rose; graceful yet rigid, formal yet coy.//

What comes after the semicolon couldn't stand as a sentence.

>the pastern//

I'd use "her pastern," or this really distances it from her.

>Her balance shifted further than planned, but still her left foreleg rose as it had to, with a grace that belied her efforts to balance her weight.//

Watch that repetition of "balance."

>hoof and hip moved in full concert to return her slender body to center,//

Don't use a comma for an aside like this. You could end one with an excalamation mark or a question mark, but no other end punctation would go in there.

>Only sheer muscle memory prevented her legs from shaking under the strain as she waited for the final command.//

Muscle memory has to do with proper movement and coordination, not being resistant to fatigue or strain.

>rise Fleur//

I know this sentence already has a lot of commas, but direct address in the middle takes commas on both sides. If all those commas in a row looks too awkward to you, then you might want to break it into multiple sentences.

>She saw only one pony in front of her, and it was herself.//

Technically, "it was she," and for a second reason why, it's because reflexive pronouns can't be used in the nominative case except for very specific uses, like an appositive ("I myself").

>The mare staring back at her was built for the limelight.//

I'm on the fence about this. I'll leave it up to you. You just used "staring," but the fact that you accentuate the repetition ("back") and that it fits thematically with the mirror helps, so you're at least doing it right. It just doesn't feel like a spot where there's really any meaning in doing so.

>She shifted beneath the dress//

Another spot where you repeat a noun you just used, so that "it" might work just fine instead.

>stepping gingerly to minimize the impact on her front hooves//

This is the third sentence in a row that has a participial phrase.

>now thrice daily//

Needs some hyphenization, but there are different schools as to how to do it. An argument could be made for hyphenating the entire phrase or just the first two words (the last pair would be hyphenated if not for the "now," which needs its own hyphen that would negate the original one, in the way that normal font and italics cancel each other out for emphasis.

>At least I know who they are here to see//

whom

>other equipment//

It's often weak to end a list with something like this. I'd either list severl of these items, since it'd help specify much better what kind of event this is than the vague tables and chairs, or go on with a couple more generic things, but forgo the "and" before the last item to create the sense of an incomplete list (asyndeton).

>hefting equipment//

In case you end up keeping the earlier instance, "equipment" is repeated pretty soon here.

>set-up//

As a verb, this isn't hyphenated.

>’Or was//

I hadn't noticed this until now, but note that bbcode tags can interfere with the direction of smart quotes.

>centerpiece; a puppet brought out for show, then stuffed back into the corner when it was no longer needed.//

Another semicolon that doesn't have independent clauses on both sides. A dash or colon would work here, or a period, if you want an informal tone with the resulting sentence fragment, but semicolons do suggest a formalism of use that doesn't sit right when broken.

>Even her favorite day bed had been replaced by a gaudy chaise lounge//

I've given you quite a bit of leeway here, but it's getting to be a bit much with all this passive voice. On the one hand, it does create the sense that it's all external to her and without her participation. On the other, the construct saps action and doesn't create the sense that there actually is an actor, that someone is doing this to her instead of it just happening by fate, so while it may match her mindset, it's also weak at making anyone specific out to be the bad guy.

>Fleur ran her hoof//

Another place that's quasi-repetitive since you just mentioned her hooves in the previous sentence, so maybe foreleg, or defltct it a little with something like :edge of a hoof."

>white and grey marble surface//

The exact phrasing you just used in the last paragraph.

>Her horn flared to life and a tendril of pink magic leapt down to the long side of the bench//

Comma between the clauses.

>miniscule//

Ugh. The original smepping is "minuscule," but common usage has forced this to be acceptable.

>The panel slid back and snapped in place as Fleur sat down, her magic already sliding the box closer to her.//

Watch the repetitive use of "slid" and "sliding."

>she turned it into a sort of vault, filling it to the brim with memories; little slices of a life that had been ripped from her hooves one day at a time//

Misused semicolon.

>surge of joy//

Try to make this more evocative by linking it to the physical sensation she felt or comapring it to some other experience she's had.

>cuteciñiera

Based on the actual word, I'd imagine the spelling to be "cuteceañera," though I don't think the official transcripts use the tilde.

>pulled more memories from the box’s embrace//

Pretty similar to the phrasing in your prior sentence.

>Fleur slowly opened the pouch and the memories came rushing in //

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>hoof ball//

Any sport I can think of pulls "ball" into a single word.

>from activity to activity//

This is pretty repetitive and redundant phrasing with how the sentence began.

>Spring//

That's not normally a capitalized word.

>pulled more items from the well-worn pouch//

And still the same phrasing you've used twice already.

>They flushed a deep crimson as she remembered that first soft kiss they shared as soon as the final couplet left his mouth.//

You've got two sentences in a row with this trailing "as" clause structure.

>The small crease in the middle of the photo did nothing to dull the excited gleam in his eyes, or the brilliant smile on her face.//

No need for a comma. It's a single clause with a comound prepositional phrase that isn't very complex.

>Her whole body seemed to tense then//

Why would it "seem" to tense? It's in her perspective. She should know whether it did or not.

>and looked//

Extraneous space.

>She told him of her arranged betrothal and they cried.//

This is really coming out of nowhere. Wouldn't it have colored her whole evening? Yet she recalls it as if she'd put it out of her mind until this moment. And their reaction to it would be more important that a mere "they cried."

>Her blood ran hot for an instant, her mind searching her insides for the knife in order to turn it against its wielder; to rip herself free from the strings that bound her, and the puppeteer that had marched her to the brink of losing everything she held dear.//

Misused semicolon.

>them – Green eyes//

I wouldn't capitalize that.

>H-how//

Use a hyphen there. It pastes into my document looking like one, but in the original story, is looks like an en dash.

>Cipher stepped back and turned, showing off his crisp servant’s uniform,//

No comma.

>undecided if she should scold him for taking such a risk, or compliment him//

No comma.

>and— Okay//

No space, and I wouldn't capitalize there. Some people say never to capitalize after a dash. I don't agree with that, but I do think it should at least be a substantial enough change in subject to warrant doing so, and this is pretty continuous.

>I— Cipher//

No space.

>If not for that//

Comma after this.

>I…” he sagged a bit and sat on his haunches, “...I//

The aside format doesn't really work with ellipses. It'd be better to do it with dashes or make the aside a separate sentence.

>“What do you mean ‘ponies like you’?//

Missing the closing quotes.

>a bit of incredulity//

Given that she holds the perspective, it's odd for her to make this external an observation about herself.

>Regular ponies; average ponies//

Misused semicolon.

>Cipher raised an eyebrow at that but Fleur continued on.//

Comma between the clauses.

>Fleur swept a hoof towards her room,//

No comma.

>on the floor//

How'd she get there? She just suddenly is, and I didn't see it happen.

>she sniffled through more tears,//

No comma.

>t-that//

Think about what sound she'd actually repeat.

>Wh— What//

No space or re-capitalization.

>A small orb floated from his coat pocket to join the two tickets,//

Capitalization and no comma.

>single use//

Hyphenate.

>mon— Mmph//

No space or capitalization.

>you,” he kissed her again, sending Fleur’s heart into overdrive, “can//

You've punctuated that as an aside, but there's no speaking verb.

>You ditched that snobby Bluemane character that your parents had set you up with and we met out at the market that night.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>carols...” he sighed wistfully, “...made//

No comma, and again, that format doesn't really work with ellipses.

>Fleur’s voice grew flat//

That's not a speaking attribution.

>guard//

You're inconsistent about capitalizing this.

>l— You did//

No space, capitalization, and what the heck is he saying at first?

>Fleur’s eyes glowed with a fiery passion for her love, and a righteous anger at the bindings that only she could see around her.//

No comma needed. That's all one clause.

>Fleur let out a breath she didn’t know she had been holding.//

Oh jeez this is like one of the most cliched lines possible. It rivals even the dreaded "single tear."

>”Or//

Bbcode tags breaking your quotes again. You're going to have to scan for these. There are more, but it's a pain to copy them out on this computer. You're also inconsistent at the type of quotes. You seem to stick to single quotes for her regular internal thoughts, but the argumentative ones alternately have singles or doubles.

>panic filled//

Hyphenate, but again, that's an awfully external judgment about herself for a limited narrator.

>Fleur, you need to be in the parlor shortly and I do not want to be late.//

Needs a comma.

>I’m coming back in five minutes and we’re going downstairs//

Needs a comma.

>Come with me F-Fleur//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>her eyes shifted to the mirror, where she knew that perfect mare was still watching, waiting to take her place//

Punctuated like an attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>Fleur’s magic jumped across the room wildly and Cipher watched with confused eyes as the silver tray floated toward them.//

Needs a comma.

>Fleur could feel the tears running down her cheeks and his; could taste them running across their lips like shards of bitter, salty cold against the last embers of a dead fire.//

Misused semicolon.

>Their lips parted and Fleur just held him there and stared at her friend//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Wh— Fleur, No—//

Spacing, capitalization.

>Fleur’s magic cut out and the tray dropped to the floor//

Comma.

>mother//

As a term of address, that would be capitalized.

>Fleur stepped daintily to avoid the shards of glass on the rug//

No speaking verb in this attribution.

>One of the servers brought me some water but he dropped the tray//

Comma.

This is good. You bastard.

This is pretty much all cosmetic, and there's nothing systemic that will require extended passages to be rewritten, possibly cuasing new errors. As I'll only need to spot-check it when it comes back, please select the "back from Mars" option.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 991

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I lay by myself in my box//

There are just a lot of little things cropping up at this point. You use "lay" again soon after, the paragraph says just about the same thing two or three times, and there are a lot of "to be" verbs around here. That's a very boring verb. You get some leeway for it in dialogue or with a first-person narrator, but you really do need to keep things active, particularly right at the beginning of the story, where you're trying to snag the reader's interest.

Sunset is taking a rather adult voice here, so I wonder at her age and education level. I presume this is a story of how she came to be Celestia's student, but she's not sounding much like a street kid.

>I know she asked everypony we knew about him, but she didn’t find out much.//

Who is this "she"? I assume the mother, but you haven't mentioned any possible antecedent for it, except possibly Celestia, which sure doesn't seem to fit.

>because all I felt was sadness//

If you really want the reader to sympathize with her, you need to bring this alive. Really sell it. Don't just tell me she's sad. Show me what the memories do to her. What sort of imagery does it elicit? What physical sensations does it cause to remember? How does she react to them?

>Underfunded, understaffed, and nearly falling apart; I could never live there.//

A semicolon really does require a formalism of structure, and you don't have an independent clause anywhere before it. Same with the next sentence.

>Why a wood pallet, you might ask?//

Now you're opening a can of worms. You have her addressing me. Not some philosophical question uttered to a generic "you" in the sky, but a conversational comment made at me. Now I'm a character, and you need to define my role as much as any other character. Who am I? Why does she want to tell me her story? Why do I want to listen? Where are we? Under what circumstances are we meeting? It'd be far simpler to avoid addressing the reader if you don't want to establish all that and frame the story.

>Suddenly//

You really ought to use this word sparingly. You don't need to point out suddenness to the reader. Just have the action happen without preamble, and the surprise is implicit. Better yet, show that the characters are surprised. And then you go and call something else sudden again within the same sentence.

>beat up//

You're using the whole phrase as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>Gently placing my teddy bear behind me, my blanket slipped from my shoulders as I stood up.//

Dangling participle. "Gently placing..." is meant to describe her, but she doesn't appear in a way that it syntactically can. You explicitly say that her blanket placed the bear.

>I meekly asked//

There's a short discussion section under "show versus tell" at the top of this thread that will give the rationale, but you're pushing the telling here. No single instance is all that intrusive, but the total builds. In the couple of paragraphs around here, look at the adverbs you're using to bluntly tell me her mood instead of painting a visual and getting me to interpret her emotions: gingerly, meekly. Then the instances of directly informing me of the emotion: hopeful smile, [face] of disgust. Finally, a blatant instance of spelling out a character's motive: hoping I could find the one responsible for being so kind (which is also repetitive with the "hopeful" that soon follows). It pays to develop a sensitivity to these kinds of constructs and avoid them in places where the emotion on display is important to the plot or you need the character to connect with the reader.

>let down//

Again, bluntly telling her mood where you should be demonstrating it through her appearance and behavior. In a very simple example, it's the difference between saying "she was happy" and "she wore a big smile." One gives me the facts but skips the visual, so it does't bring those facts to life. The latter makes me see her and infer her mood from your description. That puts me in her place briefly, which is how to forge that connection between us.

>if I was lucky, they had the ones that also had large chunks of fudge in them//

Really focus on the character's emotional connection to all these things that happen. The story is not just the events, but how they affect the characters. She's the narrator. Let the narration itself carry the mood. She's pining after these rare treats that are far from necessities, but they take her mind off her predicament for a moment. So if she's lost in an indulging moment, make the narration sound like she is: If I was lucky, I might... Mmm, I could taste it now, the warm chocolate running down the back of my throat. For a second, for only a second, I could close my eyes and sit in my old kitchen while Mom put a fresh batch out on the counter to cool. I'd steal one from her too, of course. She never cared. Maybe that's where I learned it.

>I stared up at her as she flew away, crestfallen.//

You're saying Sunset is crestfallen, but by proximity, this more clearly says that the shopkeeper is. Besides being telly...

>I turned back around to go back//

Watch that close repetition of "back." Such repetitive word choice is popping up here and there. You need to keep an eye out for it.

>That is, until, I ran into somepony’s legs.//

Why is that second comma there?

>fell to the ground in the heap//

I've only ever seen it phrased as "in a heap."

>dazed and confused as to what was going on//

To harp on the narrative voice again, if this is true, then the narration should sound dazed and confused here. That is, unless... well, going back to my point about addressing the reader. If you want to establish a frame story in which I'm sitting down with her and listening to her tell the story some time after it all happened, then this can work as her relating it after the fact like that. But if the narration is supposed to be in the moment with her, then it needs to reflect her situation.

>My eyes went wide as they fell upon the Princess of the Sun; the one benevolent leader that us commoners all loved.//

Misused semicolon again. A colon would work here, since you're defining or clarifying something. And Celestia is a sentient being, so she's not a "that"; she's a "who." Actually, "whom" here, but it's your call as to whether your Sunset knows that.

>shame and guilt apparent in his gaze//

Let me see this. As is, it's nothing more than a cold fact. Bring it to life. Put me there with him, watching him do this.

>your highness//

An honorific like this would be capitalized.

>once hard//

Hyphenate.

>I was terrified of what was going to happen to me//

So make her act and sound terrified. I have nothing but the narration's assurance in a single word that she feels this way. One example is worth a multitude of generalities.

>her words calming me slightly//

How so? What quality do they have? What images does it bring to her mind?

>your majesty//

Capitalize the honorific. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

>I felt a fresh wave of tears well up in my eyes. As they started to slip down my face, I turned away from the princess and tried to hide them.//

Let me point out an instance where you do showing well. There are others, too. You do well in multiple spots, but contrast this with some of the other telly language I marked. Here, I clearly get sadness and shame from her, even though you never had to use those or any related words. You let her actions imply her mood.

>I stuttered//

This is redundant withthe fact that she's clearly stuttering in her speech. The only such redundant speech tag that works well is "ask." Similarly, you'd never have to narrate getting cut off or trailing off when it's already apparent from the punctuation.

>I felt Princess Celestia nuzzle the side of my cheek.//

This is a fine point, but with your choice of narrator, there are certain things the narrator will never have to tell me about the character. If you just say that Celestia nuzzled her cheek, it's implicit that she felt it. There are times where it can still work to phrase it like this, and this in particular isn't a bad instance. I just wanted to point it out so you'd be thinking about it. Other verbs are much worse: things like hope, want, know, wish. She's the narrator, so it's implied that she knows what the narrator delivers as fact. If she hopes something, the narrator can simply pine away for it. It she wants something, the narrator can simply ask for it. These are character intents and motivations that are usually best implied than outright stated.

>that of playfulness to one of seriousness//

Let me see this.

>Wondering what the night had in store for me//

Like I was just saying, you shouldn't have to phrase it this way. Bu simply having the narrator ask the question (What would the night have in store for me?) makes her sound awfully circumspect about the situation. Let the narratibe tone carry the mood, too: The—the castle? I'd get to go there? Heaping trays of pastry, inviting hearths, a warm fire, all danced in my vision.

>but I barely heard her//

This is rather repetitive with how the paragraph starts. I'm also becoming wary of the sheer number of semicolons I'm seeing. For one, you don't want a writing quirk like that to draw the reader's attention away from the story. For another, frequent semicolons don't scream "child narrator" to me.

>I heard her walk away//

And more repetition, still within the same paragraph.

>miss//

Given that she was about to led into a name, this would be capitalized.

>did you think that you would be bathing alone?//

Okay, my creepy-meter just went from 0 to 10. She's just met this filly who's a total stranger, and she wants to take a bath with her? I guess this is normal in Equestria or something? I don't know. Maybe that's just grating against my headcanon, but the general practice is to assume Equestria pretty much works like Earth, except for all the ways in which canon explicitly shows that it doesn't, so I'm not sure this is a justifiable leap to make without doing some world building to portray it as normal.

>Come, let’s take a quick bath and then spend some time in my bedroom.//

That's even worse! I get that you're trying to be heartwarming, but this is just super-creepy. Celestia's dialogue here needs to be rephrased with far less of an overbearing Molestia vibe.

>I wish I was able to go back in time to not utter those words, because I knew that I just disrespected the princess.//

Okay, this really is starting to sound like Sunset is telling this story years later to an audience, but it's a really iffy prospect to do that in the middle of the story. Establish that framing up front.

>She dipped below the surface of the water to wash off the shampoo, so I did what she did to get the rest off of myself.//

You're losing the emotional connection again. How does it feel to her to take a real bath? To have warm water, luxurious shampoo? Yet these few paragraphs go by with some pretty sterile declaration of events.

>lay draped//

Redundant.

>I looked on in awe//

Fairly telly again, and over the next couple of sentences, you use "look" two more times.

>I was immensely grateful, both for that and the treats that she had promised me.//

Oh, jeez. She sounds like the guy in the candy van.

>princess//

As a term of address, a title would be capitalized.

>Her demeanor reminded me of her.//

Very unsubtle. What images of her mother does the princess evoke in her? Show me those. That'll get the point across.

>her bedroom was absolutely gorgeous; literally every filly’s dream bedroom//

Misused semicolon.

>all sorts of fancy treats lay//

You use that verb three times in this paragraph alone.

>It scared me how quickly her tone changed.//

So have her act that way or muse on it.

>Princess Celestia stressed that last word//

You've punctuated that as an attribution, but there's no speaking verb. It's also redundant, as we can already see the last word is stressed.

>passed it to me, and she passed//

Repetitive.

>ste-//

Please use a proper dash.

>My ears flicked back and I felt fresh tears in my eyes.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Fresh tears//

You just used that phrase earlier in the same paragraph.

>I looked up at her, sniffling constantly.//

You've had a couple of misplaced modifiers before, but only in a technical sense. Here, it's truly ambiguous. I bet you meant for Sunset to sniffle, but by proximity, the grammar says Celestia is, and it could plausibly be either one of them.

>confusion written all over my face//

For one, that's awfully telly, but for another, that creates a very external feel, since it's odd for someone to judge her own facial expression.

>I asked curiously//

Redundant.

>I hadn’t cried this much since my mother died//

More on this in a bit, but you haven't given me near enough background about her mother to have this carry any more than the default weight.

>Princess Celestia nuzzled me on the cheek//

There was just nuzzling going on in the last paragraph.

Celestia's dialogue is just full of ellipses, and most of them don't even feel like there would be natural pauses there. You want me remembering what she said, not that there were a bunch of ellipses.

>I was immensely grateful for everything that she did for me, and I was really excited to see what tomorrow would bring.//

See all this abstract summary of how she feels without actually demonstrating any of it?

>I heard her start to snore softly//

This is the 6th instance of "soft" or "softly" just on this screenful.

So, summing up time. On the mechanical front, there wasn't much to complain about. If there was a punctuation issue I had to point out multiple times, keep it in mind, but nothing really stuck out to me.

On the stylistic side, there's quite a bit of word and phrase repetition here. You'd do well to develop an eye for that, as it kept coming up. You tend to be very telly with the emotions, too, so focus on giving me the evidence, not the conclusion. If you write a happy character well, you'll never have to use the word. Additionally, I'd scrap the couple of places Sunset addresses the reader. I already explained why, and now that I've gotten to the end, I can see that you never fully developed any frame for the story, so it's just too problematic to try doing that.

For characterization, I had no complaints. Well, there's one, but it's a tough call whether to call it a plot or character problem, so I'll push it off to... Actually, there's another. Sunset's narrative voice sounds quite grown-up for her age, and there's a ifference in tone between the narration and her speech, which should really be the same for a first-person narrator. And that narrative voice is often pretty bereft of emotional expression here.

Plot issues. There are a couple. First, I have to agree with one of the commenters. It's awfully convenient that Celestia just so happens to help this one filly that demonstrates the exact talent she's looking for. If she's that concerned about orphans, then why doesn't she help them all? Why are conditions for orphans so bad? Why does she encounter one because she stumbled upon her, not because she was out looking for some to help? She suddenly becomes generous when necessary for the plot, but if you extend that to how she'd act beyond the story's boundaries, it has some disturbing implications. Not that this would be hard to fix, but it deserves to be. In addition, the whole scene with Celestia taking a filly who's a total stranger, springing it on her that they're going to be bathing together, scrubbing her, then asking her to the bedroom with the promise of treats comes across as incredibly creepy. I see what you're going for, but it really needs to be dealt with carefully so it doesn't create that vibe. Contrast it with Sunset being the one to suggest sleeping side by side and Celestia seeming to give in a little reluctantly. That way, it's a kid needing comfort, not an adult luring her into an alarming situation.

Next, you gave Sunset just about the most tragic back story you could. Some readers will fall for this, and some will see right through it. There's really no need to be so unnecessarily maudlin. Where emotions are concerned, less is often more. We call this "piling on," where you add every sad thing you possibly can to generate sympathy for the character, but it often backfires. There's no call to have tragedy of a greater degree than is needed for the plot to function. More than that is counterproductive. There are other ways to get her into the situation she is without making such an obvious grab for the reader's heartstrings.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1000

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First off, I didn't start keeping notes until chapter 3. So just apply any recurring problems to those as well. All I recall seeing there are a couple of minor typos and a horribly telly statement for the cliffhanger at the end of chapter 2.

So from chapter 3 on:

Capitalization issue with transition out and back into dialogue in the same sentence. Don't know if this is s persistent problem.

>We wish to purchase one third your company, together.//

Missing word.

>T-This//

Capitalization.

>huge, white//

Hierarchical adjectives. They don't need a comma.

>rock rock//

Repeated word.

>Mom and dad’s//

When used as a substitute for names, they get capitalized ("Mom" versus "my mom," for example).

>And now mom and dad are gone.//

Same deal.

>Rarity’s aura of calm fell into something bordering on concern.//

This deserves to be shown. And it pretty much is, through the rest of the paragraph, making this redundant as well.

>flowers petals//

Typo.

>Your time ran out a long time ago.//

Pretty repetitive.

>I needed dust something fierce//

Since you so recently referred to "dust and ashes" more than once with regard to the fire, this gets confusing.

>firefighter’s uniforms//

In this usage, firefighters’ uniforms.

Oh, and one from the synopsis:
>Five years of drugs and cheap thrills in the big city has//
That's a plural subject, so you need "have."

>staring at the rising smoke behind me//

You said pretty much the exact same thing a few paragraphs ago.

>I want mom and dad//

Capitalization. Suffice to say you need to sweep for these.

>I lowered my leg from my eyes//

Maneuver this sentence to the bottom of the screen, then look at the first word of every paragraph you can see. You don't want that kind of structural repetition.

>If she hadn’t succumb//

Verb form.

>familiar, white//

These are hierarchical adjectives. They don't take a comma between them.

>I walked inside, lurching to the side like a drunkard.//

Thus starts another long string of paragraphs that mostly start with "I."

>”The thing wobbled so much I fell into it.//

Somehow, those quotation marks ended up backward. I don't see any of the usual suspects that cause such a thing, so I don't know why.

>throat,” is up.”//

The quotes got misplaced.

>passed-out//

Doesn't need the hyphen.

>She won’t last long.//

He's used "last" three times in pretty quick succession.

Now comes the difficult part. I loved this story up until the end. More on that later.

This touches on several issues that would make it tough to get on the blog individually, so when you have multiple ones, it just raises the difficulty bar that much further.

For one, the language is a bit much for the general audience we try to cater to. You can get away with some of that, but the sheer number of f-bombs is pretty off-putting, and I don't think it would harm the story to replace the majority of them with something milder like "damn." There are very few that absolutely need to be the way they are to work. Unfortunately, one of them is right at the beginning of the story, which may put readers off who are sensitive to such things, but I'm willing to spot you one, because the insult in kind that Sweetie flings back at him is hilarious.

Second, we don't allow real-world drug use or obvious substitutions for such. Dust is an invention on your part, but having it in rocks and smoked with a pipe just make it an overly obvious analog for crack. The effect is somewhat different, but it's still too close. Take some of the other drug instances we've allowed: Poison joke works through inhalation of the pollen or scent, and this is canon. It's very whimsical, maybe too much so for your purposes. In a more hard-boiled example, GaPJaxie's Bioshock crossover uses drinkable potions as the delivery method. That's pretty innocent and generic, so it doesn't carry the same connotations as hard drug use (though users definitely do see very serious effects), so it still can work while being less explicit. I'm probably going to have to insist on those.

Now, I have to get into more of a gray area, and I'll say up front that this part is as much my opinion as blog policy, since it involves interpreting the plot. Suicide is another of our hot-button issues. Given the median age in the fandom, it's problematic to do anything that glorifies it in any way, since those are people who often have problems with depression and suicide. So for something to make it onto the blog, it has to pass a very strict bar of making sure the character who attempts it or succeeds does so in a very understandable and justified manner, so that it's clear even to the reader's reasoning that the character had no alternative. On the far no-no side of it are the types of stories where an angsty teen commits suicide because he thinks it'll take him to an ideal life in Equestria, and—surprise!—it does.

Now I have to get into even more of a gray area. In my opinion, Rarity's suicide is not at all justified. We're never given more than vague reasons why she's so distraught. Her empire is a sham, she misses the good old family days, etc. I see a commenter was upset that she managed to get to this state without any of the other elements intervening. I don't really agree, but I figured they'd enter into the story at some point, and while I think it's certainly plausible that she'd get to this state despite their involvement, just not addressing it at all does feel like a questionable omission. But getting back on track, I never saw an inevitable line tracing Rarity down this path of suicide. She's so disaffected all the time that it's a tough sell getting me into her mindset to understand why she does this or that she had no alternative. Frankly, I was expecting, based on their similar effects, that her flowers were the source of dust, and she was presiding over a drug empire, but was not repentant about it in general and what it was doing to Sweetie in particular. Not that you have to go in that direction at all, but it's an example of a concrete reason that would drive her to this.

Basically, she's already there when the story starts, so we never see her downward spiral or how she justifies it to herself. She only gives vague reasons, and she's a stock... well, angsty teen character with nothing propping up that characterization.

And that brings me to my final point. It doesn't feel like the story accomplished anything. It set up conflicts, but none of them were resolved. Sweetie still owes her debt. She never reconciled with her sister. Rarity never saw any relief from her mental anguish. These static characters come and go, and nothing has changed for their passage. The only change I can even partially see is that Sweetie a little more readily admits her addiction and failings, but not by a lot—she was already doing so at the beginning. The only scrap I get to cling to is that Sweetie tries to break her addiction. She ultimately fails, but there was an arc where she did struggle with it, so ending up back at the beginning isn't necessarily bad; it's still a resolution. But that's a relatively minor plot point for the story.

Oh, and I never saw the purpose of the funeral. It was a huge red herring. Why did it matter? Why did Rarity make such a big deal of it and have to be so closely involved? What difference did it make that it was the mayor? Say you'd changed the event to a fashion show that still ended in the same disaster. It wouldn't have changed anything about how the story turned out, and it's odd for such a prominent plot point to lead nowhere.

In summary, then, I think the language and how the drug use is implemented put you on the wrong side of our content policy. I'm comfortable stating that outright.

How Rarity's suicide attempts are handled (and her death as well, since it's pretty much suicide as well, given how and why Sweetie Belle let it happen) are also something that'd get extra scrutiny. I think it didn't give the topic the depth it needs to pass on that front, but another pre-reader may well think that it was justified. And while I think the ending pretty much invalidates that there's a story arc at all, that's another thing that a different pre-reader may well disagree on. If those last two were the only issues, I'd simply ask one of them for a second opinion. For now, though, I'll send the story back to you for the other issues and all the notes I provided, and if you do resubmit, I won't be the one to evaluate it so that it won't be subject to me being unilateral. I will reiterate my opinion in that case, so that I can be sure that they have it in mind and can read from a standpoint of affirming or refuting it, rather than waiting to see if they come up with those issues on their own. But I won't do any more than that.

So you obviously had a big effect on me, and kudos for that. Like I said, I loved it up until those last few hundred words, where I felt like it merely held the status quo and left Rarity's plight too vague, so you at least had me rabidly reading through 90% of it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1003

>>1000
Sorry, I meant to say that Rarity was repentant. An inadvertent "not" slipped in there.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1011

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>last ditch//

Hyphenate this. You use it again later.

>For a domain once characterized by chaos, never governed by the rules that the ponies’ world had once obeyed//

Watch that repetition of "once."

>Suddenly, a wave of emotions washed over her. Jealousy. Fear. Rage.//

Rather than state these outright, demonstrate them. That makes your character much more vivid. Make her look and act like she feels these ways.

>The Nightmare began whispering sweet nothings into her ear//

It's odd that you bringing this up at all, since you never go anywhere with it. The Nightmare is tempting her in a moment of weakness, and the entire rest of the story is a moment of weakness, yet it's strangely absent.

>…

>
>…//
This is empty filler. Let me actually see what's happening. This means nothing.

>Heck//

That doesn't really fit the tone and diction you've been using for her.

>piles fallen leaves//

Missing word.

>In the fifteen years since her ascension, she’d grown considerably; she was only a few inches shy of Luna’s height now. Her wingspan was more imposing as well. Her mane was beginning to grow out, too—it looked silky and smooth, borderline ethereal. Part of Luna wanted to reach out and run her hoof through it, but she suppressed the thought.

>
>All things considered, she was falling into her position as an alicorn princess rather nicely. The transition had always been a slow one, but she seemed to be taking it all in stride.//
The action grinds to a halt here, not because of the description itself, but because it's overflowing with "to be" verbs. You need to make more active verb choices to keep a forward momentum. Otherwise, the story stagnates.

>within somewhere within//

Extraneous word.

>the brilliantly terrifying blast of the supernova//

So was it the sun that exploded? If so, what hope does Luna have of finding it again? It's gone, a fool's errand. If not, then some other star is really close.

>The silence, brittle as ever, finally shatters.//

Why do you switch into present tense for a couple paragraphs?

>Twilight squeezed her a little tighter.//

Similar phrasing to what you just used a few paragraphs ago.

>That place may be your home, Twilight//

Look how often you use direct address in this conversation. How often does that really happen when you talk to someone, particularly when it doesn't help disambiguate, since there are only two people talking?

>“…”//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing. It says nothing about why they pause or what they're doing in the meantime, which is what carries the emotion. It's just filler.

>I will bring back Celestia’s sun//

And what would she do to save it from the black hole?

>Twilight cut her off once again//

This is redundant, as I can already see it from the punctuation.

These are mostly cosmetic things, but it could use some clearer emotional investment from Luna in places, some more thought on what they can actually do about the situation vis a vis the black hole and whether it was their sun that exploded, and don't leave the Nightmare reference as a dead-end plot point. It wouldn't take long to check over the story again, so this isn't a rejection, just a trip to Mars. So please choose that option when resubmitting.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1012

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

My first issue is that I'm seeing an awful lot of "to be" verbs early on. They're inherently boring. It's much more interesting to read about what happens, not what merely is, so it's a good idea in general to choose more active verbs where possible, but especially at the beginning, where you're trying to grab the reader's interest. And it's not just at the beginning. Do a Ctrl-f on "was" and watch the screen light up. When I count all the forms of the verb that are easy to search, you come to about one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen.

>The little one’s gaze dropped and she bit her lip.//

Note how you have two separate subject-verb pairs (gaze dropped, she bit), so they're separate clauses, and you'll normally need to put a comma between them.

>intrigued by the child’s boldness//

Beware of so bluntly telling me a character's motives. It's a fine line, but since you're using a limited narrator who takes a conversational tone in Luna's perspective, just have the narrator make a comment to this effect, and that gets around the problem while making a closer connection with the character.

>What is your name?//

Luna just heard the teacher say it...

>Her large eyes were full of concern//

And even more so than motivation, avoid having the narrator directly tell me what a character is feeling when it's even of moderate importance to the plot. It is important here, because the public's perception of her is key to the conflict. So don't just tell me her eyes were full of concern. Demonstrate it. How do people act and look when they're concerned? Show me those things and let me draw the conclusion.

>The teacher looked nervous, but there was a hint of curiosity on her face.//

Same thing. Show me this.

>“’Deserve’//

You broke the smart quotes there. Sometimes you have to play around with them a bit to get them all in the right direction.

>thou//

There's no apparent thematic or plot-related reason why she'd start speaking in archaic form right here. She didn't earlier. So make it clear why there's a change or just make it all consistent throughout the story.

>thy youth//

Note that when the following word begins in a vowel, you substitute "thine" for "thy."

>thinking hard//

This is a conclusion on Luna's part. Show me the evidence she used to infer it so I can make my own conclusion.

>subjects…the//

Leave a space after ellipses, unless they begin a sentence.

>The court proceedings alone are a headache to follow, you can’t even imagine//

Comma splice.

>the little unicorn and her classmates clearly only understood parts of what she was saying//

And what are they doing to make her think so?

>silver-shoed//

silver-shod

>clearly believing this made perfect sense//

Again, don't over-explain character motivations. This one is entirely unnecessary, as you already had her nod, which connotes the same thing. You can demonstrate a little more if you don't think that's enough, but don't outright say it.

>For all her lesser stature than her taller, more powerful sister, the Princess of the Moon cut an imposing figure – regal, powerful, and just now, a bit sad.//

Your narrator has consistently been in Luna's perspective so far, so that makes this essentially something that Luna thinks about herself, which is odd. What makes her think she cuts an imposing figure? That would seem to be others' opinion, not hers. And it's rather external to her to call her own appearance sad, since she wouldn't be judging it by appearance, but by the thoughts it causes and the physical symptoms that brings.

>pouring through books//

poring

>Yes, Luna knew that her reasoning was most satisfactory for why she had not retaken her throne.//

It's implicit with a limited narrator that the focus character knows whatever the narrator says. You shouldn't ever have to say so.

>staring in even greater shock//

Show me. But beware how, since she's the perspective character. It has to be through how she would perceive herself, so more about her posture, thoughts, reactions, and physical sensations.

>she stammered//

Except for "asked," a speaking verb that's already demonstrated is redundant. The stutter was spelled out in the speech, so we already know she stammered.

>feeling as if some secret part of herself had just been rudely exposed for all to see//

Just like with "knowing," a limited narrator should rarely need to tell me what a character felt. Just say it as a fact that the comment had exposed a raw nerve about her past, and it's implicit that she feels that way.

>Now Princess Luna was truly intrigued.//

So make a narrative comment expressing her intrigue instead of bluntly telling me that's what it is.

>with curiosity//

These "mood" prepositional statements are almost always redundant with something already in the sentence, like your word choice of "studied."

>- Ms. Cherilee, that was her name -//

You'd used proper dashes earlier, so why hyphens here?

>These are residents of Ponyville?//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>in embarrassed chagrin//

Unnecessarily blunt, and redundant anyway with bowing her head.

>GIANT//

Italics are preferred for emphasis.

>threw in. Other fillies and colts began throwing in//

Watch close word repetition like that.

>in resigned exasperation//

Last one of these I'll mark. There's a short discussion section at the top of this thread about show versus tell which you should read.

>Luna felt oddly pleased by the compliment, and dipped her head to the filly in return.//

Opposite problem to what you had before. There are no separate distinct subject-verb pairs here, so that's all one clause that happens to have a compound verb. You don't need the comma.

>She came to stand next to her sister, looking across the garden at the same patch of beautifully-arranged flowers in the shape of the sun and moon.//

Misplaced modifier. Some are easy to straighten out and thus aren't really problematic, but this one is truly ambiguous. Participial phrases usually modify by proximity, so the "looking..." one is presumed to describe Luna, since it's closest to her in the sentence, though I believe you probably meant Celestia. It's impossible to tell.

>Weeks Later//

This is really inelegant. There are better ways of working into the narration how much time has passed.

>Princess Twilight and her friends who were guiding her through her own castle.//

It's several paragraphs later that I realize this is in Canterlot. Because Twilight is located closer to "her own castle," it sounds like you mean the one in Ponyville.

>Pinkie made a small, “Eep!"//

When not stated as a direct quote (the "a" makes it generic), you don't need that lead-in comma. And note how the closing quotes here are the simple style for some reason, which doesn't match the rest of the story.

>and a slide, too//

Why are these italicized? It makes them come across as a thought, not speech. The fact that you used "mouthed" already shows it's not aloud, so you don't need the italics.

>cackle//

That seems an odd word choice, as it doesn't fit the tone.

>friends'//

Simple-style apostrophe.

>BOOM//

It's a perfectly legitimate word. You don't need to make it into a sound effect with the all caps, as we discourage sound effects in narration anyway.

I don't get why everyone yells at Pinkie at the end. Are they exasperated? If so, why? It sure fits the party atmosphere, so it wouldn't seem out of place. But if they're expressing support for her, that's not apparent either.

So the biggest two things here are the prevalence of telly language and the sheer volume of "to be" verbs. The story's chief conflict is quite muddled, though. Luna states at first that she just feels she's not caught up enough yet to warrant a throne, but she implies that guilt from Nightmare Moon is the reason. Except that when Ghost Giggle directly challenges her on it, Luna doesn't have to wrestle with it much and has to admit that she'd defeated the Tantabus by releasing her shame. Likewise, that argument crumbles rather easily when Celestia challenges it, which brings her back to her original stated reason. Yet she never struggles with that either, not on screen, at least. So when she still has reservations, it's unclear why. Neither one has really been presented as a viable conflict so far. Make her struggle with whatever it is, and bring that conflict into the foreground. As it is, it just goes away rather easily and without much direct soul-searching, deciding instead to shove that off camera and assure the reader that it happened by the end. But that's the whole reason for the story to exist, so it needs to get the attention and development it deserves.

The bulk of it was well-written, though, and with a little work, I could see posting this.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1017

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>high altitude//

You're using the whole phrase as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.

You have five instances of "was" in the first paragraph alone. The next has two more. This is an inherently boring verb, and stacking so many up at the beginning creates a bad impression. It brings the action to a halt, because nothing happens. Things just are. You need to choose more active verbs in general, but the beginning of the story is an especially bad place to cluster them. And that's not even counting the other forms of the verb, like the "been" I see in the second paragraph.

>payed//

This is only accepted as a past tense for one specific meaning, and not the one you have here. It's "paid."

>Such was the fate of any metal materials used when building a factory made of condensed water.//

Only certain ones, really. Aluminum does fine, for example.

>She followed the vent until she found an opening, lowering herself into an intersection of hallways.//

Note that participles mean thing happen at the same time, yet you're clearly creating a sequence of things here.

>Scootaloo had never understood pegasus architecture, being born and raised in Ponyville. //

I'm not sure how that would hurt her understanding of it. Taste for it, maybe, but understanding seems an odd thing.

>The thought of the tiny town had her thoughts//

Watch the close repetition of all but the most mundane of words like this.

>of relief//

These kinds of prepositional phrases that reveal a character's mood are pretty obtrusive and often redundant with something else already in the sentence. Her sigh already connotes relief, for instance.

>Her stomach growled at her, she sighed, and walked to the far end of the locker room to a purple door emblazoned with a white lightning bolt.//

The syntax with those commas is off.

>The ceiling was easily three stories high here, dotted with thin metal rods//

Just after you got through saying they didn't use metal anymore because it corrodes?

>Scootaloo’s eyes widened and she licked her lips at the thought of her first hot meal in weeks.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Reaching inside, Scootaloo lifted out the first jar//

Another participle that synchronizes things that shouldn't be.

>the his light//

Extraneous word.

>Scootaloo dashed over the catwalks like a madpony, tiny wings buzzing.//

This is a nice action sequence, but note how it's entirely focused on what happens, not what emotions it causes for Scootaloo. It leaves things feeling a bit sterile.

>wings buzzing//

You're repeating that or something similar quite a bit.

>There could be no mistakes now. She would not go hungry for another month.//

There you go. Don't lose sight of what the experience is like for her. These kinds of comments help connect her to the action.

>found herself dropping onto a catwalk overlooking a chamber filled with cloud machines. So she’d found herself//

Watch that repetition again.

>Catwalks//

You're also really using that word a lot.

>floor, she may have been able to drop off the railing and continue on the bottom floor//

Repetition again.

>thin, rusted aluminum//

Aluminum doesn't really rust. That's why they use it on airplanes. Instead of the oxidate flaking away like it does with iron, it stays on aluminum and forms a very hard skin over the metal.

At the end of chapter 1, I'm already seeing three persistent things: an overabundance of "to be" verbs, lots of repetitive word choice, and a tendency to forget what emotional effects the events are having on Scootaloo.

>day–not her doing, for sure–with//

Looks like you're using en dashes there. You'll normally put spaces around those, or go with em dashes and no spaces. This goes throughout the story.

>looked up over//

Kind of on adverb overload there. Pick one.

>S-She//

Think of how that would actually be spoken: sss - she. They wouldn't be stuttering an "s" sound, since there isn't one there. Sh-she. And for a stutter, you only capitalize the first bit of it, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

>something–anything–to say//

This is almost exactly what you already said about the CMCs.

>thirteen year old//

Hyphenate all that.

>In her mind, she was replaying everything the factory had told her about the incident.//

That's a rather bland statement for what an experience it must be. I can't really tell whether you're going for an omniscient or limited viewpoint, but if it's the latter, the narration needs to carry the tone. Just like dialogue, how it's said is as important as what it says.

>lightning”,//

Comma placement.

>she punched a hole right through the glass with a scream//

Sounds like she used a scream to hit the window.

>who’s fault//

whose

>Or, didn’t do.//

It's pretty rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>The first few seconds of death are confusing at best, and terrifying at worst.//

This is taking an almost comical tone. Did you really mean that? It also strangely takes a very external voice, which is an abrupt jump from the limited narrator you'd used until now. And within a couple of sentences, you're back in a limited narration again. That just jerks the reader around.

>through a this//

Extraneous word.

>No panic or tantrums or sobs.//

You just mentioned "panic" in the previous sentence.

>Maybe it was the dreary calmness that permeated her entire being//

This seems like pretty advanced language for her. More or less, you seem to be taking a limited narrator in Scootaloo's perspective, so the narrative voice shouldn't wander too far from her own in inflection, vocabulary, tone, and word choice.

>Scootaloo wondered if they’d give her a funeral.//

In a limited narration, it's pretty rare that you'll need to narrate that the character knew, wished, wanted, wondered anything. Just have her ask the question, and it's implicit that she wonders it. You've already been doing that, so keep it up.

>pony heaven//

Why would she refer to it as this? Does she think other sentient races get different heavens? This smacks much more of authorial cuteness than character authenticity.

>Her eyes grew wide with terror, fully expecting a hellish nightmare beyond this gateway to eternity.//

Then why doesn't the narration sound like she's scared. This is another aspect of a limited narration: it can take on the expressiveness of the character's own thoughts, not only in what she says, but how she says it. She should be freaking out here, not calmly stating that she's terrified.

>Equestrian speed of nearly three hundred miles per hour//

How is that different from a normal three hundred miles per hour.

>Of course, in the afterlife the physics of speed and force of impact are completely impractical. Of course, that’s not to imply it didn’t hurt.//

Given the limited voice, that implies Scootaloo knows that physics don't apply here, which would seem to contradict how unfamiliar she is with what's been happening to her.

>Scootaloo sank down to the bottom of the tunnel almost comically.//

In whose judgment is this comical? Her own? There's nobody else there to say. This sounds a whole lot more like the author telling me I should think it was funny, but there's barely any evidence as to why I should.

>The piece that impaled her must have missed her vital organs and the blood loss left her unconscious.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>N-No//

Only capitalize the first instance, unless it's something like a proper noun that has to be capitalized anyway.

>Unsure what to make of this, Scootaloo shifted nervously on the other side of the room.//

She's having an awfully calm reaction to Dash screaming at her.

>On the other side of the room, Scootaloo was leaned up against the wall, her head hanging low.//

Look how many "to be" verbs are in this paragraph. It's bringing the action to a screeching halt. And a lot of those are in the service of passive voice, which also saps the action, but it also leaves the description without an instigator. Part of keeping things active is not only using active verbs, but assigning actors to those verbs, but here, you have "Scootaloo was leaned" (by whom, or through what circumstances?), the metal "was stuck" (by what means?), etc. Make all of these actions, and assign blame for those actions. For the most part, that just means removing the passive voice. "Metal stuck through her chest" works just fine, as well as being more active and more evocative of a visual scene.

>smell that permeating//

Verb form.

>everything everywhere//

Pretty redundant.

>and as Rainbow Dash opened it to inhale//

Needs a comma to set this dependent clause from the following one.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. Paste one in the right way.

>Wake up Scoot//

When direct address occurs in the middle of a sentence, it takes commas on both sides. Otherwise, she's telling someone else to wake Scootaloo up.

>Breathing the stench was agonizing//

Another spot where the narration itself should carry her mood. Have her comment on how it smells, what it's doing to her, and have it basically sound like dialogue she might speak.

>on!//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word, put it in itaics, too.

>Don’t just stand there you idiots//

>I’m here Scoot//
Comma for direct address.

>Now she cried tears of joy.//

So there's an instant change of mood, but we don't get to witness the transformation? We just have to take the narrator's word for it that it happened? This is a huge emotional moment in the story. Don't gloss over it. What wild thoughts go through Dash's mind? What does sh do while thinking them?

>H-Help//

Capitalization.

>she couldn’t breath//

Typo.

>wound, and into//

No need for a comma there.

>Please Rainbow Dash//

Comma for direct address.

>Rainbow Dash shot up in her bed with a scream.//

I'm unclear at this point how she got the accident scene so accurate. Did she actually see it at some point?

>This was the third night in a row she had been plagued by the same nightmare.//

That begs the question of why Luna hasn't helped her or even noticed. It's definitely something readers will wonder, even though it is kind of a cop-out for being able to write bad dreams.

>were bitten at by the wind//

More ungainly passive voice.

>I’m telling you Twilight//

>Don’t worry Scootaloo//
Comma for direct address.

>She had expected Twilight to be skeptical.//

This really feels like an incomplete thought. Twilight really is skeptical. So what point was Dash making. That there's no surprise here? Or that Twilight was even more skeptical than she'd anticipated?

>I have a bed up here, why don’t you lay down for a few hours?//

Comma splice. For that matter, why'd Dash go to Canterlot to find Twilight? Why wouldn't she be in her own castle? If there's a plot point as to why, then make it. Otherwise, this just comes out of nowhere for no reason.

>suddenly fuming//

Let me see this. The following sentence actually does a pretty good job of carrying the tone, but on its own, it doesn't make her look angry.

>I don’t need help, haven’t you been listening?//

Comma splice.

>Emotions swam in circles through her mind, first confusion, then anger, and finally a sudden sadness that gripped her and forced her to sit, head down.//

This is a pretty important emotional point in the story, which isn't a good time for telling. Demonstrate these emotions through her behavior and appearance.

>Her voice trailed off.//

Redundant. It's already apparent through your use of an ellipsis.

>B-Bleeding//

Capitalization.

>She stood up, taking a few steps towards Rainbow Dash//

Note that participles imply concurrent action, though she'd more logically take a few steps after standing.

>N-Nothing//

Capitalization.

>in an attempt to hid//

Typo.

>I-If//

>W-What//
Capitalization.

>either."//

You've got a different quotes character there than you've been using. You probably should sweep for this.

So, this was a very interesting story. I've seen several others that dealt with similar subject matter and that this very much reminded me of. I did like, it but it has its problems.

Anyway, stuff that I had to mention multiple times in these notes? They need your attention. Many of them are cosmetic in nature, but in particular, the way your characters show emotion (or don't) needs some work. And even some of the cosmetic things, like the abundance of "to be" verbs, affect readability.

I do want to talk about the ending, though. Open endings are fine. But they way to do them is to imply or set up a limited array of possible outcomes and attach character investment to every one of them such that there are clear stakes to how it actually turns out. That way, there's an emotional payoff, no matter which one the reader chooses to imagine, whether he wants to pick his favorite or think his way through them all.

You've basically set up two possibilities, and neither one has a payoff.

Before I get to that, though, there are elements common to both interpretations that are too vague to pull the reader in. We get a few hints to Scootaloo's tragic past, but the show doesn't support a version of her that has to steal to survive. Surely, the CMCs or Dash would have an inkling that was going on. Not that you can't have this version of her, but when you make that substantial a break from canon, you have to connect the dots to get me here from there, like explaining how she's avoided them knowing or how she might have gotten caught in the past, but convinced them she was on the up-and-up now. But then we get to the final chapter, and there's all this back story that makes it apparent your Scootaloo is somewhat older now. That wasn't evident through any of the story until then, so a reader is going to assume she's canon age here until shown otherwise.

Then there's a nebulous story about how Dash was there when Scootaloo's mom died, and for all its detail, it really skimps on the part where Dash couldn't take on the responsibility of caring for Scoots. Yet that's the part which really matters here, since it's at the core of the conflict. We see no emotional reaction from Scootaloo about that event, and Dash glosses over it so much that there's no way to tell what it means to her, besides some generic crying. It just goes by so fast that it's hard to assign much importance to it. Neither does it delve into all the other questions that would arise about it: What about other family? Where's Scootaloo's dad, an uncle, a grandparent? That taking her to a home was the only option is awfully pat, especially when it's not even explained.

So back to the ending. Either Scootaloo's ghost was really there or it wasn't. Given that part of the story is told from Scootaloo's perspective, I have to assume she was really there and not some figment of Dash's imagination. Telling the story from an imaginary construct's viewpoint is an odd choice, unless you want to get into one of those metaphysical topics where Dash believed in her so fervently that she actually created her. But there's nothing to suggest that in the story, so I can't call that a legitimate option.

I need to stop going on tangents, but I also want to say this: your story is probably one that wants to be significantly longer. Not by an order of magnitude or anything (though it's possible), but more like 2-3 times longer. That's because you keep making this play back and forth between whether Dash is really seeing Scootaloo or not. If you really want to play that, you probably want to avoid the parts in Scootaloo's perspective, since they obviate the question (with the exception I already described). But the trick there is to keep throwing the question into doubt from both sides repeatedly. You have to get the reader flipping back and forth on it, which is sometimes more effective when the character is certain she knows, whether or not she's right. And like horror writing, you have to keep upping the ante to continue engaging the reader. Keep making things weirder and weirder, then tossing in some plot development that seems to change everything, then reverse it again. Stuff like that. The other thing is Twilight. You use her as a bit of a character foil, but she wasn't even necessary. Her involvement didn't change anything. Dash could be just as equivocal without her. It's nice to have the one "sane" character who attempts to ground the other but who still may be wrong. But you never go anywhere with it.

Endings again. If Scootaloo is just a product of Dash's mind, it didn't help her to come to any conclusion on anything. She seems a little calmer at the end, I guess? So maybe she's learning to let go, but that's me stretching for an explanation, as Dash doesn't really say anything to indicate it. You don't want to ask the reader to invent the story for you. Except in an open ending, you kind of have to, but the problem here is that even if Scootaloo's real, that's still an outcome Dash is working toward, so you need it either way. Yet if Scootaloo is real, you make all these philosophical arguments about what lies beyond, then peter out into Dash not really having any hopes or dreams for it. Scootaloo, either, then Dash apparently concludes that her friend is now slipping into eternal oblivion (which if you're going to use Scootaloo's perspective at all, wouldn't this be a very powerful moment to do so, since you've spent so much time already relating her afterlife experience, particularly since you imply by her not passing through the portal that she has some unfinished business to accomplish?), and she's... I guess "indifferent" is the best word for it. Here's the whole moment the story has worked toward, and Dash decides that it doesn't even matter. She never made her peace with Scootaloo, which seems like something either one of them might want, if not both, but they just drop it, and Scoots fades away.

So no matter which outcome I assume, there's never a meeting of the minds, they never come to a resolution of their relationship, and neither one seems to care about how things are left, so why would I?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1018

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>as you might imagine.//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>Typical pegasus, I suppose; always ready for a fight.//

For a semicolon to work, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete.

>as it mostly involved threats of one kind or another and consistently increasing color in their language.//

Comma for the dependent clause.

>crawled to the back of my cell, at the corner of solid steel and impenetrable rock.//

Isn't that where he described the chamber pot to be? Why would he want to spend any time over there?

>rock­face//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>equestrian//

Languages get capitalized.

>Once the sane and logical portion of my brain had chance to catch up//

Missing word.

>frightened beyond belief, but the effect did not disappear. After staring for a moment in shock//

This isn't the worst place for telling, but with two instances so close together, it's a bit much. You might want to demonstrate some of this than just saying it.

>had me literally drooling//

He's pretty much already said he was doing so, which also obviates the need to use "literally."

>bucking//

This is a pretty lazy curse word, as canon all but eliminates the possibility that it means anything like this.

>adolescent, purple//

These are hierarchical adjectives and don't require a comma.

>an estranged look//

I have no idea what that's supposed to mean.

>bunsen//

That's a proper noun.

>half-­heartedly//

That's all one word, no hyphen.

>Spike watched in half-­panic, half­-apathy//

And how does that look?

>airship//

That's not the same thing as a hot air balloon.

>All the color had faded and mold had taken its hold on the ropes and basket.//

That needs a comma to separate the clauses.

>The frazzled unicorn//

You're starting to make an awful lot of use of such descriptors. The chief problem with them is that they usually get a little too clever for their own good, which draws attention away from the story. We call this "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome," which isn't the use of such phrases at all, but overuse of them. They also keep presenting the reader with information he already knows.

>Twilight came galloping towards the castle.//

Why doesn't she land in a castle courtyard or something? There would be room, and isn't the castle where they originally launched the balloon from anyway?

>panting heavily with exhaustion//

Minor issue: by its placement in the sentence, this would seem to describe the gates, but it's easy to use a bit of logic to decide you mean Twilight. Be careful with proximity of modifiers, though, or you'll end up using one that's misleading or ambiguous.
Major issue: Prepositional phrases like your "with exhaustion" here are telly, and of things that are telly, this kind in particular is almost always redundant with something else you've already written, like her panting.

>who she would see//

whom

>and red came running//

Red what?

>she knew not to dare mention it//

As phrased, you want "mentioning." Long story short, it's a gerund that serves as the direct object of the verb "dare" in the infinitive "to dare," which serves as the direct object of "knew."

>(and Cadence as well)//

Parenthetical elements with literal parentheses tend to work only in comedies, where the narrator can take a very whimsical tone, or in very limited narration, where they come from the perspective character's voice, but you're using an omniscient narrator.

>Twilight paused//

You've punctuated that as if it were a dialogue attribution, but there's no speaking verb. Plus the old "she paused" with no further explanation is always an empty statement. What's important is what happens during the pause, not the fact that the pause happened.

>shame!

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word, italicize it as well.

>a scolding is a scolding//

Why are you shifting to present tense here?

>5//

Write out numbers that short.

>Let’s continue our conversation walking.//

This comes across as pretty heavy-handed. Your dialogue has gotten a tad talking heads, so you throw in what an attorney would call a leading question to wink at the reader and move them along. And look, they did what he said, yet you omit the rest of the conversation completely. Certainly don't go into unimportant detail, but a one-sentence summary would be fine. Still, the "let's walk" followed by "they walked" is almost meta.

>thinking of a certain pink earth pony//

An occasion where explaining the reference kind of ruins it.

>It’s been awhile//

This is an instance where "a while" really needs to be two words, since you have to have a noun to serve as the predicate noun for "been."

>somewhat quietly//

Alright, this becomes an issue with an omniscient narrator. "Somewhat" is a judgment call, so who's making the judgment? The narrator doesn't represent any of your characters. So I don't know whose opinion this is, and you don't want a narrator forcing one on the reader.

>My sister’s asleep right now, don’t worry about it.//

Comma splice.

>seated.”

>
>Twilight nervously trotted to the seat and sat//
Watch all that word repetition.

>The dozen guards marched out the throne room doors, and locked them as they left.//

That's all one clause, so you don't need the comma.

>Celestia turned to her only student with a small smile on her face//

See, it's a little ambiguous who's smiling. Grammatical proximity suggests Twilight.

>“You see, Twilight...//

Look how often you use direct address in these conversations. Then think about how often you actually do in a real conversation. It doesn't even help the reader here, as there are only two characters present. This continues into the next chapter.

>Taking some time to return to senses//

Missing word.

>Twilight put a hoof to her chin and thought hard about the answer.//

Beware over-explaining character motives or intents. The hoof to the chin already denotes thoughtfulness. Don't then spell out that it is.

>One thing remained constant, though;//

Since you go on to define that thing, a colon would be more appropriate.

>Twilight breathed deeply and tried to empty her frantic mind.//

She hasn't been acting frantic. I mean, look at how Twilight calmly thought about answering Celestia's question just after learning that she was dying.

>Twilight furrowed her brow in confusion//

Another instance where a telly prepositional phrase is completely redundant.

>We’ll never really know what happened in that cave but I have a theory that the magic of friendship didn’t come into it.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>“Princess, I don’t understand,” Twilight interjected.//

We've just been through a monologue, so it's a good idea to re-establish setting and character with some more narration, but through this and the next few paragraphs, we're getting little beyond speaking attributions.

>Claws.

If you're making a pun here, it's lost on me. I'm only vaguely getting from context that this is supposed to be some kind of musical.

>there parents//

Their/there confusion.

>These wings cannot lift me anymore than I can lift the sun or moon.//

In this usage, you need "any more" to be two words.

At this point, I surmise that this takes place before canon made Twilight an alicorn? I'm guessing you'll eventually say that was an illusion she keeps up to further the ruling succession, but it might help if you gave a clearer indication somewhere in the previous chapter of when this takes place. I mean... you have Shining Armor as a colonel, so it arguably takes place after all that. You do have an AU tag, but you also start from canon somewhere, so it'd be nice to having that jumping-off point.

>why the buck//

Another tired application of that overused "curse" word.

>She put her hand in her hooves//

Huh? She has a hand?

>she put a wing around her pupil//

If they're just illusions, then how would Twilight even feel it? I'm surprised Twilight doesn't say anything about it, now that she knows.

>ponyville//

Capitalization.

>which I knew couldn’t end well//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

I'm still waiting for an explanation of why Luna or Cadance can't do it... or an explanation of Cadance at all.

>imposters//

The preferred spelling is "impostor," but this isn't wrong...

>out­-”//

Please use a proper dash.

>allowed to happen. Allowing//

Watch that word repetition.

>Arguments continued to fly across her mind and collide with one another. Her metaphorical moral compass spun as if she had reached a pole//

This deserves a little more. A few examples are worth a ton of generalities.

>The young drake//

It's his first appearance in the chapter. Lavender Unicorn Syndrome aside, this should use his name anyway.

>The curtains silently drew themselves closed and the vapor began pulsating with a blue light.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>imposter//

Again, "impostor" is preferred.

>already under far too much stress from what you’ve been told already//

Repetition.

>even if it’s a lie//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>I have created many prophecies before Twilight//

Seems like you meant that to be direct address, but you're missing a comma.

>and while I cannot say much more about the future,//

Needs a comma to set off this dependent clause.

>Yes, I think you see it now Twilight.//

Comma for direct address.

>These titles that brought me pride are my shame. My disgrace is permanent.

That's sounding less like off-the-cuff dialogue and more like a prepared speech.

Really, the issues here are pretty much cosmetic, which are easier to fix. They're mostly recurring mechanical things. The only character/plot problems I saw were already pointed out in the details and minor anyway, so I'll just reiterate the big stylistic points.

You tend to use a lot of descriptors like "the purple unicorn," which can quickly get obtrusive. A number of your conversations get talking heads as well. There are short discussions of both Lavender Unicorn Syndrome and talking heads at the top of this thread, so I won't repeat them here. The only other issue is the abnormal level of direct address you use in your dialogue. Real people just don't talk like that. Real people also have more visual and behavioral cues than can be reasonably used in writing, which is why you can sometimes get a pass for that, to a degree. But in almost every case here, there are only two characters talking, so it's not necessary for disambiguation. An occasional use is fine for incidental reasons, plus it sometimes gets employed for emphasis, but you use it so often as to feel artificial.

Other than those, your story looks quite good, so it won't require much checking. Please choose the "back from Mars" option when you resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1040

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>in Whitetail Woods//

Woods are something that would typically have a "the" in front of it. This happens multiple times.

>Trixie figures//

The fact that the preceding thought is a personal opinion of hers and delivered in a fairly conversational style, it's redundant to point out she thought it. It's implicit for a limited narrator.

Just four paragraphs in, I'm already struck by the flood of "to be" verbs. I bet they'll be pervasive through the whole story, but the beginning is a particularly bad place to forgo active verbs and have a stagnant feel.

>Her muscles tense as the lightest hint of strawberry floats through the air; the scent of her mother’s mane as she stands at the stove.//

There's no independent clause after the semicolon.

>Trixie was born on a mere iron mill,//

A mill is typically the building, not the grounds around it as well. So this sounds like she was born on the roof. I think "at" would work better, or "in," if she was literally born inside the building.

>She bounces.//

I don't get a thematic reason for the repetition. She hasn't expressed a mood about bouncing, so I'm not sure whether this is her getting hung up on a single bounce, or if she bounced multiple times. And without a clear emotional attachment to not just her situation but the bouncing itself, it's not making a connection for me as to having any special meaning. In fact, it comes across as kind of comical.

>Trixie lights her horn, and the bucket of rainwater she keeps by the caravan door comes flying over, spilling a deluge of water onto herself.//

Reflexive pronouns really only work when they refer to the same thing as the clause's subject, which is "bucket" here. Just use "her."

>clang//

That's a valid word as is. There's no need to italicize it and make it more of a stage direction of a sound effect.

>Trixie uses a spell to lift the water from her coat, and returns it to the bucket before heading back to bed.//

That's all one clause. No need for the comma.

>But when she lays down//

Lay/lie confusion. This one would require a direct object.

>Twil//

She's cutting off her own thought, so why no dash?

>Friendship is for ponies who everypony already likes.//

Whom, if you think Trixie would know that. She is using some advanced language in her narration, so it points to yes.

>Sparkle could stopped Trixie//

Missing word.

>The air is light, and tastes like daisies on Trixie’s tongue.//

No comma.

>The wind croons for a minute until she falls low//

I can't tell whether you're personifying the wind or referring to Trixie.

>The laughter has deepened, and sounds like it’s been laced with poison.//

No comma.

>Trixie hates it. She hates it. She wants it to go away.//

I'm having trouble buying the intensity of her mood here. The language isn't particularly evocative, there's no emphasis, and it's not reflected in her behavior. Particularly that last sentence—in a limited narration, it's rare that you should need to tell the reader what a character wants, since the narrator can express the desire for her.

>knock//

No need for the italics.

>its jagged edge//

A shovel with a jagged edge?

>stom//

Another cutoff without a dash. I see more of them. I won't mark any more.

>she can only muster the sense to ask Sparkle what she’s doing here//

I guess it's your risk to take, but you're forcing distance between the reader and the character by presenting this interaction via detached narrative summary. If it's meant to show that Trixie is in a weird mental state and everything around her is muffled, that could work, but the narrative remains so smooth and precise that it doesn't carry that effect.

>holding it in is causing her more pain than she’s felt since he touched her//

That's pretty vague and not very evocative. How does it feel? Her references to her mother come across like this, too. We don't get any of the back story to that, which would probably take too much space in the story to explore anyway, but what is there about her is cliched. And somewhat abandoned since you don't revisit the topic after Trixie compares herself to a foal crying for her mother in the second chapter.

>So she lays there//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>creaks//

Same deal with the sound effects.

One plot issue I had with this:

If Trixie is having this bad a reaction, why is it just now coming to a head? Surely she's had similar episodes before when someone's approached her for any reason. It's not mentioned that she's had no contact with anyone else. I guess it doesn't say she's still performing, I guess, which would really stretch credibility. She doesn't act like it surprises her, so it must have happened before. Nobody noticed?

The ending was a bit vague as to what benefit Trixie hopes to get. Yes, a friend, but that's not her immediate problem, or at least it's never made out to be. The lack of a friend isn't what's causing her mental episodes, so does she hope that Twilight can help her with that? Seems like her first concern would be to deal with the pain, and certainly getting someone to assist her in finding that help would be an immediate step, but then the focus would be on seeking relief, yet Trixie's thoughts are dwelling more on wanting a friend. She can pine for both, but the pain is the more glaring need, and it gets all but dropped.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1042

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I’ll get to work on them if you can get through them to start getting that door open.//

There are a couple of spots like this where you have some close repetition of words. Three uses of "get" in one short sentence?

>She quickly returned to her hooves just in time to see—//

Lines like this show that you're using a limited narrator. You're in Luna's perspective, and you take a conversational tone. The narration at large still does show signs of being in Luna's perspective, but not so much a conversational style. Take these battle sequences. Luna's cursing, so she's stressed and upset, yet the narration informs me of that mood without carrying it. For a few simple examples of what such a limited narrator can do, if the character is excited, the narrator can make an exclamation. If the character wonders something, the narrator can ask the appropriate question. If a character is flustered, the narrator can fumble for words. Given that this is the type of narrator you've selected, use it to its full advantage.

>He green scales//

Typo.

>and Luna gasped in shock//

Beware directly identifying emotions. Doing so in a prepositional phrase like this is especially bad because it's almost always redundant with something already in the sentence. I get shock from the gasp. You don't need to reiterate it. And then you go on to use "shock" again in the next paragraph anyway, so eliminating this one avoids the repetition.

>The enemy spat the word special.//

That's pretty much evident already from the emphasis placed on it. If you really want the narrator focusing on a single word, it's usually worth isolating it, something like this:
"And not even one of your own—" he spat the word "—sspecial dragonss."

>he seemed unconcerned//

Another case of blunt emotional/mood information. What about his behavior does she read this way?

>submachine//

This is correct, but earlier, you spelled it as two words.

>more more//

Repeated word.

>light flooded the room, thanks to several giant lights on the ceiling//

Repetitive and kind of obvious.

>four monitor//

You have a few spots like this, where you use a multi-word phrase as a single descriptor of a following noun. With one specific exception, these should be hyphenated.

>Luna groaned in frustration//

>Luna sighed with relief.//
>She shook her head in disgust.//
More of these prepositional phrases with blunt and redundant emotional information.

>Favored by Luna//

I wonder what copyright issues this would cause. I mean, did Luna allow them to use her name?

>beside of her name//

Lose that "of."

>The screen continued to become brighter and brighter//

Look how incredibly repetitive and dry this section is. There's a line of voice-over, then there's a very factual description that always begins with "the." The reader has no reason to care about this game. They're not going to be enthralled with watching the opening. Connect it to how Luna feels about it. She chose not to skip the intro. Why? What does it make her think? What does she enjoy about it?

>Luna looked back to see the last tree move back//

Watch that repetition of "back."

>your Highness//

>your Majesty//
Both words would be capitalized in the honorific.

>The last time he’d met someone he only knew online, it hadn’t been pretty.//

Given that this is a big motivation for how he handles the situation, this is a very vague and unsatisfying motive. There's no explanation, so I don't understand his attitude at all, and it's pretty key to his mindset.

Now I'm in chapter 4, and I'd like to contrast this one with my earlier comments about how Luna's limited narration during the game and in watching the intro were so dry and flat. The narration here is much better. It delves more into how Luna feels while she's preparing the night, and the flow and mood of the narration itself supports that.

>your highness//

Same issue as before with capitalizing the honorific. You'll have to scan through for these on your own.

>Don’t worry, little one.//

She's going to refer to the maid the same way she did the bat? That seems rather insulting.

>by Faust//

It's really, really hard to take your story seriously when you pull crap like that.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom. Do a search and replace of this.

>“Best darn tootin’ mane cutter in the whole city!’//

Inconsistent quotes. That opening one should be a single.

>stetsons//

That's a proper noun.

>laying on her bed//

Lay/lie confusion. It's a tough verb, since there's some overlap. The difference is that "lay" takes a direct object. You do it to something. So you lie down, but you lay your head down. The main difficulty comes in that the past tense of "lie" is "lay." So it's lie/lay/had lain and lay/laid/had laid.

>Her humidifier ran on her bedside table and she had a book in her hooves.//

This already has alarm bells going off in my head. You've already given Button a plausible back story as to why he's unlucky in love and might be a match for someone like Luna. Piling this on really doesn't add anything. It's not necessary to make the plot work. Actually, I'll hold judgment on that to see whether you actually make a useful plot point out of it, but it's likely there just to be maudlin and ramp up pointless sympathy for the character, which serves only to weaken a story. Tragedy is best held to the minimum level needed to make a story work, and it's unlikely this much is needed.

>Thanks, mom.//

When used as a term of address or as a substitute for a name, familial relations get capitalized. This comes up multiple times. So direct address like this always gets capitalized when it uses only that word or as a title:
Hello, Mom.
Hello, Brother John.
When used as a substitute for a name, it gets capitalized when it's the only word. A qualifier makes it more generic and thus lower case:
I'm going to the store with Mother.
I'm going to the store with my mother.

In the second interlude, look how often Celestia and Luna use direct address with each other. Then think about how often you would in a real conversation. Especially since there are only two characters present, direct address isn't necessary to disambiguate, so it'd really only be used for emphasis, and it doesn't seem necessary for much of this,

>He’s the only pony besides you who I can actually talk to!//

whom

>The well-to-do locations were not quite high dining, despite the name.//

I have no idea what you mean by "well-to-do" here. It's usually used to describe a person. And it's pretty contradictory with "not quite high dining." Unless you mean that of its locations in well-to-do areas, and then why wouldn't it be? I'd expect those locations to be nicer, or else nobody would go there.

>Button watched as the customers trotted to and fro, followed by waitresses, waiters, and managers.//

The staff is following the customers around? That's weird.

>Fancy Fair//

You just called it Fancy Fare in the last paragraph.

>Button’s grin held place//

Missing word.

Suffice it to say I'm not pointing out all the little editing things like this. Since chapter 2, I'm not reading in detail anymore, just skimming to make sure the plot makes sense and the romance is developed enough.

>I’ll be back once you’ve decided on your food.//

How does he know this? He didn't ask them again.

I'm struck by how easily Luna uses contractions. I've actually though that since the beginning of the story, but in this situation, she's stressed and wouldn't be able to concentrate on it. She doesn't really in canon. So is it something she's still working on? Is she self-conscious about it? Or do you feel like after the intervening years, she's changed how she talks?

>Button took a deep swig from his cup.//

You're falling into the very common trap where writers lose all imagination of what to have their characters do with their drinks. He's stirred in sugar and taken four drinks.

fyi, this in in the next chapter after the two parts of interlude 3. I just scrolled through those, since the political intrigue doesn't really interest me, and it's not the part of the story authors tend to mess up.
>nosey//
nosy

>something?//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word, include it in the italics.

It's really straining credulity that Button is the one who witnessed the changelings. That's an incredible coincidence that the one who did conveniently has the ear of one of the few ponies who can do something about it, and even that's by chance, because he doesn't know it. It seems less plausible, and it makes the story feel like things are being placed in service of getting to the desired outcome instead of evolving in a believable way. There are a number of ways he could come to have knowledge of this that would rely less on amazing coincidence, which is a weak way to have the plot work out.

>Anyways… How was your evening?//

Yo have this habit of capitalizing after an ellipsis, but it's only typically done when the continuation doesn't parse as being part of the same sentence. Here's an example where if you removed the ellipsis, the sentence would still make sense, so capitalization isn't needed.

>His voice trailed off//

It's not necessary to narrate this when it's already evident from the punctuation.

>Mi’lady//

That doesn't need an apostrophe.

>Everything from the floor to the arches up on the massive ceiling shined//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense, which requires a direct object. It's what you do to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

>Starry’s voice trailed off//

Same deal with the trailing off.

>Button felt himself gasp//

That's an odd way of detaching him from the action. It's like he didn't intend to gasp and didn't notice it at first. Just have him gasp. Feeling it gives it more of a physical aspect when it should be about the emotional response.

>Starry and Button could barely make out a few shadows//

You'd kept the scene in Button's perspective (and have done well with perspective throughout the story, which isn't an easy thing to do), so why are you going to some kind of weird joint perspective here?

>tisked//

tsked

>Woah//

Why can't anyone spell this right?

>T-thanks//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated here.

>little-to-no//

And for all the hyphenizations you're missing this one is unnecessary.

>BVVVVRAAAAAAAAAAAAKKKKKK…//

Sound effects in narration like this are discouraged. Describe how it sounds.

>Corruption!//

>It’s a trap!//
Italicize those exclamation marks. Just keep an eye out for these. They're a pain to paste in and retain formatting. I'm not going to mark any more.

Wait, how can they hear the enemy team? I get the difference in Luna's team, where some are speaking and some are typing, but I assumed their voice communications would be confined within the team, and the same of the other team.

>summoning chaos blades around hooves//

Missing word.

>Oww! Hey!//

That's kind of odd for him to react as if he really did hit his head. It probably wouldn't sync very well, so I can only assume he was doing so for comic effect. For that matter, Luna getting all weepy over him is needlessly maudlin, and it's not like she isn't very experienced at this. She didn't react anything like this other times he's died. She's kind of holding the idiot ball here.

>Luna cut herself off quickly.//

This is the same problem as narrating trailing off when there's an ellipsis right there indicating the same thing.

>Thanks Button//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Me neither, Starry. Me either.//

Why does he say "neither" one time and "either" the other?

>She trailed off.//

Unnecessary.

Wow, Luna's kind of going overboard on the expository dialogue with Blueblood here.

>Luna’s voice trailed off.//

...And the only worse thing is that this is the second time in the paragraph you say the same thing.

>yourself... “//

The extraneous space has made the smart quotes backward.

>Is this the Royal Symphony?//

Given the piece, I'd expect her to be more interested in the piano soloist.

>the two sisters walked out to the great hall and Princess Twilight went in the opposite direction//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

Okay, Rarity's dying husband is another example of needless, tacked-on tragedy. By this point, you've still never made use of Button's sickly mother, and I've begun to doubt you ever will.

>Her horn lit up for a moment before she nodded. “Truth.”//

So he lied about telling Starry Skies, and she couldn't detect it? She must not be very good. I can't even figure how he could spin that into a way that he's not technically lying.

In this fight scene after Blueblood gets stabbed, the perspective is jumping all over the place.

>The smell of burnt flesh filled the air, and she quickly extinguished the spell. Breeze looked back at the results and nodded. The bleeding had stopped, replaced by burnt flesh.//

Watch that repetition of "burnt flesh."

>Stepping back out into the hallway, the sound of battle again reached her ears.//

A classic dangling participle. "Stepping back out into the hallway" is supposed to describe Flair, but she doesn't appear in the sentence. This explicitly says the sound of battle stepped back out into the hallway.

>fear evident on their features//

If it's so evident, why don't I get to see what it looks like?

>She opened the large box first and grimly removed the tight black suit housed within.//

Getting into repetitive structure again. All seven sentences start with the subject, and five of those subjects are "she."

I went through the whole thing this time (and spent all day doing so). It actually avoids the biggest pitfall, which is asking the reader to buy the couple without justifying it. So you're in good shape there. Since I started this about 12 hours ago, I can't remember if there were any overall points I wanted to sum up, so suffice it to say that there were a few storytelling issues like the pointless tragedies that I did discuss in detail, and other than that, a number of persistent mechanical issues. If I had to mention it more than once, then you probably need to scan the story for them, since I wasn't exhaustive. But it looks like the story's in pretty good shape, and I could see posting it with a little more work.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1043

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>as she did every night time gave her enough respite for wanderings//

I can't quite get this to parse.

Since I'm at a stopping point anyway, I'll say that I'm noticing a fair amount of repetition. First, there are a lot of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring verbs, since nothing happens, so you should strive to use active verbs where possible. It's not to the point where its really obtrusive yet, so you could do a sweep for them if you wanted, but more just keep it in mind for your future writing.

The other two kinds are related. Authors of intermediate experience often learn a similar lesson with sentence structure and try to throw in more varied forms, but they often overuse them and actually become very repetitive in the act of trying not to. The chief culprits are participial phrases, absolute phrases, and "as" clauses.

>Celestia’s gaze panned across the dank room, breathing in the stale air as she did so.//

And by using so many participial phrases, you'll likely run into their attendant problems. Here's one: a dangling participle. "Breathing..." is supposed to describe Celestia, but she doesn't appear in the clause. You explicitly say that her gaze breathed in the stale air. And you've hit another one, too. Participles and "as" clauses synchronize actions. We'll see if you have a chronology issue at some point, but here, "breathing" is already synced to her gaze panning across the room by grammatical convention, so it's redundant to add the "as she did so."

>some of them more pleasant than others//

This is so vague that it's meaningless. A couple of examples speak louder than thousands of generalities. And you're trying to get me to identify with the character, so blocking me out of the emotions involved is counterproductive.

>Celestia whipped around in surprise//

It's usually not a good idea to bluntly inform the reader of a character's emotion. It's better to demonstrate it through how they act and look. TO give a simplistic example, it's the difference between saying a character was happy and that he smiled. But this particular type, where you put the emotion in a prepositional phrase, is almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence, like her whipping around here. That already connotes surprise.

And beginning with that sentence, let me point out all the participial phrases you use in the next three paragraphs:
>falling from the ceiling//
>followed by a billow of dust and a thump//
>biting at her eyes//
>waving it away with a hoof and blinking rapidly//
>Lying on the floor below the hole in the ceiling//
>examining it from all sides//
>flipping to the first page//
So you have seven of them in just six sentences. Even in advanced prose, simple and compound sentences are going to do your heavy lifting. These kinds of structures get sprinkled in for flavor, but if you overdo them, they really stick out.

>I have yet to have learned//

That's a rather convoluted tense that doesn't quite work here. Just "I have yet to learn" will do fine.

>Celie and I’s//

Celie and my

>I, Princess Luna, intend to keep a private journal of our affairs//

This is awfully formal. She's pretty vague about the purpose of the journal. If she means it to be a historical record that she intends others to see, then it stands to reason she'd say that. But if it's meant to be for her personal use, then why would she take such an impersonal and cold voice?

>As mentioned, we have recently obtained our cutie marks...//

Does Luna actually write the ellipsis? I doubt it. If not, then don't include it. Just stop where Celestia stops reading. Alternatively, you can add a fourth period, which denotes that you're omitting part of a transcription through the end of the sentence instead of trailing off.

>Yet, that may fall through as well.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be correctly used. This one is not.

>The holiday idea fell through//

By now, this sounds much more like a record of personal thoughts than something she ever intended someone else to see. It's inconsistent. You'd do well to stick with one sense or explain why it changed.

>but… I do not know what to make of it//

Another issue with ellipses: they're primarily a speech affectation. They buy someone time, reflect a thought they lost interest in, or show distraction. This doesn't happen in writing. She has the time to decide what she wants to write, and if she second-guesses herself, she can erase it or not write it in the first place. For her to deliberately mark three dots on the page, she had some intent behind doing so, but a) it's clumsy, b) it doesn't fit with her formal style, and c) it's not producing any apparent stylistic effect. It's a common mistake in diary and journal formats to put in things that simply don't belong, and this is one of them.

>And who had she blamed?//

>She was the only one who Luna had trusted//
whom

>Then, why?//

No reason for that comma to be there.

>…//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in better writing. The fact that she pauses is virtually meaningless. It's the context that matters, what she's doing during the pause, how she acts what she thinks, but you skip over all that.

>… Was//

Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis.

>She had neglected the one who she loved most.//

whom

>“Excuse me Princess,” said a voice, “But it’s past time for the sun to set.//

When you transition out and back into a quote with commas like this, don't capitalize the second part.

>down underneath//

Pretty redundant.

I will also say that this is obviously one of the emotional cruxes of the entire series, and as such is already a very commonly tackled topic. We wouldn't be too keen on featuring yet another one of them, unless it stands out from the rest in some way. You do take a different angle with Luna's journal, but then the ending is a little underwhelming. Not that you should go overboard with the emotion, as an over-the-top maudlin story is pretty transparent. But Celestia doesn't have that much of a reaction beyond some vague and generic tears. She's just found out that Luna blames her for the biggest turmoil she's ever undergone, and Celestia accepts the blame for it. Surely that warrants a little more for her to work through it. Again, not in a maudlin fashion, but the pacing is awfully quick there that she immediately understands, accepts, and apologizes for it. The real character growth comes from the process of the transformation, not so much the end result. So take your time a little more with getting her from point A to point B, and you'll be on to something here.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1045

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Anypony who knew Trixie mentioned how she loathed hot places.//

This is a problematic place to start. For one, you go into a limited narration in Trixie's perspective soon after, while this feels like an omniscient statement. For another, Trixie's not portrayed in canon as someone whom ponies do know well, so there's an immediate disconnect with her character, plus the insinuation that this has come up many times before, yet we don't know about any of them. Not that you can't use such characterization, but build the bridge to get me there from what we see in the show. Really, I think you'd do fine by deleting this sentence and the first word of the following one. Or just shorten this to say she loathed hot places.

>inkling//

That's a really odd use of that word.

>if it wasn't for the broken wagon wheel beside her//

You're talking about a hypothetical situation, so use subjunctive mood: if it weren't...

>Upon recalling the time she mentioned her dislike of wheels, she couldn't help but faintly chuckle.//

She didn't treat it like a joke last time, so why would she find it funny now? If she's had a change of heart, that's fine, but tell me a little about it.

>tautened//

Another strange word choice. Keep in mind that with a limited narration, you're reflecting the character's inner thoughts, so if you want her to drop in more advanced words to her stream of thought, do so more consistently, so that you characterize her that way. Then, something like this wouldn't feel out of place.

>What bugged Trixie more, however, was the sun and the landscape conspiring against her.//

Actually, I should have pointed out something like this from an earlier line. This one:
>She just wished the wheels didn't bite back.//
When a limited narrator can express a character's thoughts for her, you should usually avoid saying that a character knew or saw or wished or hoped things. There are other examples, too, but I'll jump to the reason. She wouldn't think to herself that she was wondering something. She'd just wonder it. So while this would work fine for an omniscient narrator:
She wondered why it was so hot.
This is more appropriate for a limited narrator:
Why was it so hot?
In a limited narration, it's not just the information, but how it's perceived.

>the unicorn//

This gets to another aspect of limited narration. When she refers to herself, it shows how she thinks about herself. Names and pronouns are pretty universal, but this usage suggests she would actually refer to herself in her own thoughts as "the unicorn." It'd be rare that I could see that working. Maybe if she were the only unicorn present and she felt out of place?

>Trixie knew nopony would blame her if she did.//

Just marking this same type of thing again to reinforce my earlier comment before leaving you to your own devices on the rest. When a limited narrator says smoething, it's implicit that the perspective character knows it, or the narrator wouldn't, either. So just "Nopony would blame her if she did" would work fine here.

>Her wagon would be waiting for her as well if she was told the truth, its new set of wheels replacing the semicircles it once wore.//

I don't quite understand this. She's fantasizing about getting a new wagon, or that the appreciative townsfolk would fix hers up while she was gone? And another "was" that should be "were" for subjunctive mood.

>The last time she used a train, the seats prodded her back and a cacophonous screech split her eardrums. Needless to say, she hadn't used a train since.//

This is an event in the story's past. The second sentence correctly uses the "had" tense. The first sentence should, too.

>only concerned with finding bits//

Kind of like the issue about narrating things she knew or wondered—be wary of spelling out her motives, too.

>Jolting up in the air, she landed on all fours and massaged the sore spot.//

Note that participial phrases mean that things happen at the same time. So she jolts up in the air at the same time that she lands. Surely they'd happen one after the other.

>Focusing on the train tracks stretching out to the horizon//

Except for the dialogue at the end of the preceding paragraph, note how you have three narrative sentences in a row that start with a participial phrase. As a somewhat unusual structure, it stands out easily when repeated.

>splitting her ears//

You used a really similar phrasing just a few paragraphs ago when talking about the last time Trixie used a train.

>it rippling like an ocean's wave//

That "it" doesn't flow very well. As long as you're not using very many participles right around here, that would do fine. You don't need to convert it to an absolute phrase.

>Glancing to the left//

Let me use this paragraph as an example. You go through stretches where you use a lot of "to be" verbs. They're ordinary enough that it's not so much the raw repetition, but that they're weak verbs. Nothing happens. It's more interesting to read active verbs, so choose those whenever you can. The first five sentences are fine. You use nice active constructs and only one of these verbs. Then there are four over the next three sentences. It can bring the action to a halt when they get clustered like this.

>the voice's drawl sounding rather humorous to her//

How so? You're just asking me to take the narrator's word for it. What's funny about it? What images or memories does it conjure?

>There was an urge to point this out//

I like this, but give it a little more punch. Why does she want to do this? How close does she come to saying it?

>She paused for a second.//

You have characters pause fairly often. It's an empty action. What's more important are the emotional cues she displays during the pause, not the fact that the pause happened.

>Cherry chuckled again//

There's a lot of chuckling going on, too.

>Cherry brought her focus back to the landscape ahead.//

You've been using Trixie's perspective so far. How would she know this?

>Then, her throat tightened.//

No need for a comma there.

>Trixie couldn't help but don a bemused expression//

Besides being telly, it's odd for the narrator in her perspective to draw a conclusion from her expression, since she can't see it. She'd dwell more on the thoughts behind what's driving it, not the expression itself.

>Cutting herself off//

That's already evident from the punctuation, so this is redundant. This also goes for narrating trailing off when there's already an ellipsis.

>Sure, she may have never read such books//

What books? I don't know where this is coming from.

>For reasons unbeknownst to her, a small plank attached to its top.//

You haven't been using sentence fragments. You can for this narrator, but you don't want to wait this far into the story before breaking that out.

>Trixie arching an eyebrow at the sight//

This is an awfully formal structure to represent her curiosity at the sight. I wouldn't seem to fit her mood well.

>eyes fixed to the wagon//

I've always heard this as "fixed on." As is, it sounds like they're in physical contact.

>Cherry cocked her head, eyebrow raised.//

And now she's going to raise an eyebrow too?

>Nodding, a slight smirk adorned Trixie.//

This says that her smirk was nodding.

>if the rumors were true as well as others//

The "if the rumors were true" part needs to be set off with a comma, and the "as well as others" should be cut. It's vague and pointless.

>wished she was//

were

>While Cherry picking//

Why is that capitalized?

>Trixie's wiggling legs//

I assume this is Trixie testing the soil, but odd that we didn't hear about this while Trixie was narrating about the soil. It's odd for it to come up for the first time now.

>"Of course Trixie will," she quipped.//

That's not really a quip.

>With the irony lost on Trixie//

Then how does the narrator know this? Trixie essentially is the narrator, so they'd have the same knowledge.

>An hour slogged by since Trixie started working//

One of those verbs needs a "had."

>Trixie couldn't help but think how standing amongst the crowd at the train station or working at the wild bar couldn't be so awful in the grand scheme of things.//

See if you can rephrase that to get rid of one "couldn't." And if she's that hot, why hasn't she taken off the hat and cape?

>poignant//

Another really strange word choice.

>Grasping the bucket of water, Cherry heaved it toward Trixie.//

Another case where the participle synchronizes things that probably shouldn't be.

>splashing onto the unicorn//

Another spot where it's odd for her to refer to herself that way.

>Shivering and chattering her teeth//

Third sentence in a row with a participial phrase.

>Trixie pushed herself back up with dilated pupils.//

Really external feel here. She wouldn't know her pupils were dilated. What she would know is that the ground was spinning and Cherry's identical twin was watching her.

>Though she didn't waste a second shaking her body like a dog drying itself.//

It's tough to relate a visual effect. Just say she shook off the water. And maybe that the sudden motion probably wasn't a good idea while feeling that woozy.

>Nodding, Trixie's face tautened.//

Didn't you say almost exactly that same thing before? Anyway, "tautened" is still an odd word, and there's a dangling participle that says Trixie's face nodded. While true, I hope it's not alone in that sentiment.

>It's true, Cherry Jubilee.//

She just used direct address a bit ago. People don't do this very often, particularly when only two of them are talking.

>She was actually defending the ponies I considered rivals.//

Where's that "I" coming from? And this change of attitude probably deserves some more depth, as it's the core of your conflict.

>Trixie's pupils dilated.//

How would she know that?

>she pieced together the hypothesis Applejack's friends taught her a lesson//

Kind of oddly phrased. It took me a couple of readings to figure out what it said.

>Applejack must have learned a lesson about friendship//

Hm. That's not really what happened, but I guess Trixie wouldn't know that. You're going for a really cutesy moral here, and it might not be the best route. It is show feel that once a lesson is learned, things wrap up, but that doesn't mean that they don't have to follow through with their responsibilities. Do you want this to have a more realistic feel?

>"If Applejack or any of her friends are excited to see you again, you'll know they meant no harm."//

What reason would any of them have for coming back there? It's a pretty untestable statement, and I'm a little surprised Cherry goes for it.

>Trixie brought her hoof to Cherry's the pair engaging in a firm hoofshake a second later.//

Missing comma, but it's a really stiff and overly formal wording anyway.

>her visage donning a slight smile//

It's an odd thing to attribute actions to body parts unless they're involuntary.

>Cherry's behavior tickling her mind//

Oddly phrased again, and let me know why it was funny. Don't just say it was.

>currency as though they were //

Number disagreement.

>With dilated eyes//

Her eyes dilate a lot.

>Departing the plantation filled Trixie to the brim with ecstasy//

Don't be so blunt with the emotions.

>Not much changed since she trotted away from it not too long ago//

Needs a "she'd," and why would it change? She's only been gone a few hours.

There's a nice idea here, but it's not quite given enough room. This is a pretty big change in Trixie, and it occurs very quickly and with little fanfare. It might even deserve a little more contrast—at the beginning of the story, Trixie's already pretty good-natured and optimistic about Twilight, but the other friends don't come into play until later. It'd look like more of a reversal of attitude if she were still derogatory toward Applejack at the beginning so that when she defends AJ reflexively, a more sudden realization hits her. It probably also deserves to brew over a little more time. Cherry had mentioned working for two days, yet Trixie's there for a single afternoon. Physical exhaustion's a good way to break someone. It could also bear mentioning how Trixie knows as much as she does about them, like how they have friendship lessons and what they might have been doing in Dodge Junction. It's a little vague about why she wants to visit Twilight, too, which makes all the trouble she's willing to go to harder to take.

For that matter, Cherry also had a pretty abrupt shift in her attitude. I suspect she did that deliberately, as she did seem to do an "I told you so" to Trixie, but I'm not sure how she knew it'd work, since she doesn't know who Trixie is. So you might consider pacing her reconsideration out as well or making it clearer she was engineering the whole thing.

You've got the building blocks here. Do a little more with them. You have an interesting take on having two characters interact that I've never seen before (Trixie mentions having worked on a rock farm in "Magic Duel"—maybe that provides a different perspective for working here, and maybe it'd make her a little better at it?). And watch those quirks of narrative voice. Those are really the only big systemic thing I saw. Just on that unique pairing of characters alone, I'd like to see this fixed up so I can post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1061

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>puffy, white//

>gleaming, silver//
>white, rubber//
These are hierarchical adjectives, i.e., they describe different aspects of something, so they don't need a comma between them.

>with eagerness//

You generally want to avoid these prepositional phrases that feed the reader a character's mood or intent anyway, but it's odd to describe the structure as eager.

>Her eyes then watched//

It's often a dicey prospect to attribute actions to body parts, unless they're involuntary. It's just odd and distances her from it, since she presumably wants to watch it.

>airfield beneath one of the goals—a frame of thick cloud two yards in width and length, encasing a loose net and floating just a few meters off the airfield//

Watch repeating an unusual word so soon, especially in the same sentence, unless it's for a clear thematic effect.

>opposite of her//

You don't need the "of."

>KIDDING//

I'm only marking this once, but it's preferred to use italics for emphasis.

>only knew a few of them – by name only//

Watch that word repetition again.

>number 9//

It's preferred to spell out numbers that short, but since it actually appears as the numeral on his jersey, I'd recommend keeping it as such but putting it in quotes.

>among their separate halves//

For only two items, use "between," not "among."

>and exchanged focused words//

This is awfully vague. Is this a pep talk between teammates? Trash talking between rivals? Good-natured? Angry?

>*TWEET!*//

Don't put sound effects like this in narration. Just describe the sound.

>as it was kicked off by Raven Blitz//

Passive voice isn't really buying you anything here.

>excitedly//

You're using that word pretty often.

>Coming as a shock to him alone//

Coming as a shock to whom? I can't figure out what you're trying to say here.

>For the opening minutes of the first half, the ball was traded between the teams numerous times.//

That's rather boring and expected. Make it sound more exciting. A dozen changes of possession, for instance.

>green, curly//

No comma, and reverse the order.

>began singing the name of the scoring player//

And which player is that? If they're all yelling it, surely the narrator knows.

>now leading//

>now messy//
>sleek looking//
>left hoofed//
You're using the phrase as a single modifier, so hyphenate it.

>She hovered just above her captain and scowled as he berated her, turning her cheek away from him as Pink Slip flew in to ease the veteran's tension.//

It creates a clunky, repetitive feel to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence like this. Or, for that matter, when there's a cluster of sentences where most of them have one.

>switching her view to each of her players one at a time//

Are you just saying that she's looking at each of them? Because that's a really odd way to phrase it.

>the Cloudsdale fans expanded//

What does that even mean?

>“THAT’S A PENAL—“//

>“Now listen here, little fill—“//
Note that some things like dashes can break smart quotes. Your closing ones are backward.

>Rainbow Dash and her father embraced in the air//

And the usher's not going to yell at them this time?

>If Pink Slip can do it//

Needs a comma right after this.

>causing her to become small in his stare//

Another really awkward phrasing. These turn up from time to time. It'd do you some good to read this story out loud and see what sounds strange to you. Is this a phrasing you'd actually use if you were talking to a friend and describing this to him?

>relievedly//

Adverbs are pretty weak words anyway, so you ought to limit how many you use, but this is just a really unnatural-sounding word.

>Rainbow Dash lamented//

Exotic speaking verbs are fine from time to time, but they also stand out easily. Ordinary ones pass by without notice, but when you start using too many of these, they draw attention away from the dialogue. It's best to hold them to very occasional use for variety and when they actually change how the reader will hear it.

>in anguish//

Again, avoid using these prepositional phrases that bluntly give me a character's mood.

>If he had turned to the Cloudsdale supporters, he would have had a chance at seeing his number one fan looking at him with sympathy, but he instead turned to the Trottingham fans, who were noisily berating the star with ecstatic jeers. He sat down on his cloud and dropped his head.//

More unnatural-sounding narration. It's getting worse as the story goes on. Maybe you were pushing to get to the end of the story? Or maybe running out of ways to describe the game action? You want to keep the reader entertained. The narrator is the play-by-play announcer. Does this sound like something you'd hear the analysts say on television?

>net ,//

Extraneous space.

>single, impressed//

No comma

>“Their loss,” Rainbow Dash was assured.//

Was assured by whom? This is really odd to give a speech attribution to someone who didn't say it.

>if you asked any red supporter//

Why are you addressing the reader now? If that's a gimmick you want to use, you need to do it consistently throughout the story.

>their wasn't a single attendant//

There/their confusion.

>animatedly//

Yeah, you really need to cut down on these adverbs.

>Woah//

Why can't anyone spell this right?

So aside from the obvious things (basically, whatever I've has to mention more than once), the game action gets bogged down at times. It's really hard to keep something that relies on so much visual information from playing smoothly in the reader's mind. He has to keep track of quite a few characters, where they all are, an d what they're doing. It's tough, but I mentioned treating it like a color commentator, and that's really how you have to see it. If you were listening to the game on the radio and couldn't see it, what kind of language would the announcer use? What would he do to make you able to see it in your head?

The story pretty much promised a father-daughter bonding experience, but it didn't so much deliver. The second chapter was nice, but it didn't draw a strong conclusion. Rainbow learned a pretty obvious lesson, and her relationship with her father didn't change for the experience. And they get abandoned for long stretches during the game action. That makes the story seem to lose focus as to what it's supposed to be about. Do you want it to be a game narrative or a chaaracter piece? I suspect the latter, since that's how you begin and end the story. Plus the synopsis says as much. But most of the story is game description with little to no effect on the focus characters.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1080

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>a characters reasoning//

Typo in the synopsis.

>falls eve//

fall's eve

>the only other light source to illuminate the streets were //

Number agreement: source -> were.

>small auburn stool tucked underneath, next to a small//

Watch repeating a word in close quarters like that.

>a small collection of books. A small//

And this is just a couple sentences later.

>hung by the cinch’s strap off the corner of the shelf. Three portraits hung//

Same deal. The sentence structure is very repetitive here, too. They all have the same rhythm and inflection, and they all start with the subject. The beginning of the story isn't the time to create the feel of reading a list.

>crimson coated//

You're using the whole phrase as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>Her fuchsia mane hung down//

A new clause begins here, so separate it with a comma. There's a brief discussion of this in the section about comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>longing desire//

There are times when it's okay to directly identify a character's emotions for the reader, but most of the time you want to demonstrate them through the character's appearance and actions. That gets the reader more in touch with her and makes your story more interesting. So what actions might se take and how might she look that would lead the reader to conclude she felt this way?

>‘Mare of the Hills’//

Names of paintings go in italics, not quotes.

>Her mane’s hue resembling parsnips with streaking crimson highlights.//

That's not a complete sentence, and if it wasn't intended to be, it really doesn't fit the omniscient narrator's formal tone.

>Although those wings weren’t developed enough yet to lift her off the ground more than a few feet in the span of seconds.//

Similar issue before with sentence fragments. If you want to take a limited narration, those usually have a more conversational style, but this doesn't quite fit with the very formal and descriptive note you've struck so far.

>His violet coat had begun to fade with age, his mane and tail were both short, hazelnut brown with strands of gray.//

Comma splice.

>leather bound//

leather-bound or leather bound. But... leather, as in the tanned hides of dead sentient cows? Really?

>Pleeeeeaaase?...//

Switch the order of that punctuation.

>spring green//

Hyphenate.

>with both innocent and mal intent//

Really odd use of "mal" there, and you're being really unsubtle with the character emotion again.

>Tarp smirked, a small chuckle was the only answer she got in that moment.//

Comma splice.

>Sorry Bumpkin//

Comma for direct address.

>‘Sides//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in from somewhere else.

>He walked to the corner of the bed, taking the corner of the quilt and blankets in his teeth, pulling them back to reveal the bedsheets.//

Note that participial phrases mean that things happen at the same time, while these would more logically happen one after the other.

>Tarp continued//

Missing punctuation.

>Quiet cackling filled the room, keeping it down to avoid disturbing his wife in the next room.//

Dangling participle. "Keeping it down..." is supposed to describe Tarp, but he doesn't even appear in the sentence. This explicitly says that the room was keeping it down.

>Pumpkin blushed in slight embarrassment at this.//

Two things here. Again, you're being very unsubtle, but these prepositional phrases are an especially bad way to do it. They're almost always redundant with other context already in the sentence, like her blush. And the "at this" is a bad way to use demonstratives. Another common one is "with that." These refer to large chunks of the narration as their antecedents, which makes the writing rather self-aware.

>sarcastically, giving a small sigh in defeat//

Show me her sarcasm. Don't just say she is. And there's another one of those weak prepositional phrases that identifies a mood.

>Turning around to face Pumpkin, she gave a back and forth motion in no.//

Another case where a participial phrase is synchronizing things that shouldn't be. And that "back and forth motion in no" is really awkwardly phrased.

>with that//

Ah, and you used that one, too. Go figure.

>“What’s that Bumpkin?” He asked//

Capitalization.

>hoof skimmed over various books along the shelf, until his hoof//

Watch that repetition.

>spine, a crimson and velvet halved heart stitched to the center of the spine//

And again.

>Mare of the Hills//

Italicize.

>in surprise at this//

More weak phrasings.

>She was staring at the painting before turning to him, a worried expression etched her features after seeing her grandfather’s reaction.//

Comma splice, and let me see that expression.

>Pumpkin looked downward, lightly tapping her hooves together as her ears stooped downward.//

There you go. This is how to do it right. You're giving me lots of body language from her, and I can tell how she feels even though you didn't mention a single word about it.

>Nodding as if confirming with herself.//

Another out-of-place fragment.

>This was how she wanted to explain it, placing her fore-hooves firmly back on the covers.//

The participle here just doesn't parse. It makes it sound like she wanted to have her hooves on the covers to explain it.

>Tarp stared at the striped spine, after a moment of hesitation, he inched it forward with a hoof.//

Comma splice.

>back of his barrel before walking back//

Repetition.

>in curiosity//

I've harped at you enough about these. You should know what to look for now.

>the cover etched in gold lettering ‘The Jouster and the Rose’//

That doesn't quite parse. And book titles also get italicized.

>This isn’t the sort of book to be read at the bedside…//

Why are you switching to present tense here?

>“Scooch over” he requested.//

Missing punctuation.

>striped//

You keep referring to the book like this. I got the idea long ago.

>The Jouster and the Rose//

Italicize.

>Listen Pumpkin//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>She seemed hesitant for a fraction of a second before a look of determination set in, nodding in affirmation.//

The "nodding" is located so far from its intended target (she) that it's ambiguous.

>this, unsure of how best to answer this//

Repetitive.

>one that masked a subtle shade of sorrow//

Go ahead and read the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread, too. It'll explain a bit more about these unsubtle emotional cues.

>Celestia's//

You've had fancy-style quotation marks and apostrophes throughout the story. You should scan for any simple ones like this and make them consistent.

>Blue Mountains portrayed far in the distance that had their own subtle glow.//

Another fragment.

>That same love and pride shined//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense, like what you did to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

>Pumpkin’s eyes grew wide in fascination and a gaping smile formed on her muzzle.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Garbed in a periwinkle blue set of armor, his helmet left a gap at the top to reveal his spiky blue and mauve-purple mane.//

Another dangling participle. This says his helmet was garbed in armor.

>His tail the same color scheme as his mane, only much smoother and a bit longer in comparison. His wings spanning past his tail.//

Fragments.

>Tarp continued reading.//

It's already implied Tarp is reading it, and we're hearing him read the text. It's really out of place to have this here, and it kills immersion. You're also being inconsistent about using quotation marsk for the parts he's reading.

>He stood before a beautiful mare that sat on the paved road.//

A pony would be a "who," not a "that."

>during that years Crystal Faire//

year's

>Rose-" Tarp gently pointed a hoof at the mare. “-had//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs. Alt+0151: —. And here's how to punctuate/capitalize an aside in a quote:
Rose—" Tarp gently pointed a hoof at the mare “—had

>When their eyes met, they saw something in each other’s eyes, they didn’t know what it was at the time.//

Comma splice.

>she asked “Was//

Missing punctuation.

>Was it love at first sight they saw gran’pa?//

Missing comma for direct address, and it's really awkward to have that "they saw" in there.

>Far from it Bumpkin//

Comma for direct address.

>mane, mumbling to herself over her mane//

Repetition.

>’Forgive me fair maiden.’//

That opening quote is backward.

>after helping her to her hooves//

Capitalization.

>She reached a hoof out to shake//

Missing punctuation.

>It’s a pleasure to meet you good stallion//

Comma for direct address.

>"The knight//

There are a number of places around here where you have the simple-style quotes again.

I'm just seeing the same problems over and over. I'm going to stop taking notes, unless I see some problems with the plot or characterization.

Tarp's got a really over the top reaction to reading the story's ending. Where tragedy is involved, less is often more. Having characters get all maudlin is counterproductive, and many readers see it as being emotionally manipulative.

>shun//

I don't think that's the word you meant to use.

That ending... it comes out of nowhere. The story had wrapped up, and then there's this knock at the door. There was no impetus for the story to go on any longer except for this, but's entirely meaningless. We're not given any foreshadowing that something else would come of all this, no clue that there would be some continuing conflict. This is a pretty poor way to end a chapter. It should either build up a cliffhanger (which this isn't, since it's completely without context) or wrap up a plot point (which this does, but it was your only plot point, so it's not effective at leading into another one).

Question Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1089

>>1061
Quick follow up from my emails: you mention once that writing about a sports game should be done like a play-by-play commentator, and then later on you say like a color commentator (analyst). I'm getting the impression you meant the second one, but wouldn't it be better to give a highly descriptive play-by-play and let the reader do the analyzing? You know, like show-vs-tell.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1093

>>1089
Well, the analysts in the booth do keep up a commentary during the game as well. So yes, more about how the action is described, but not about things like the player's current statistics or why the team has played over its head in the first half.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1095

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>as she raised the sun for the last time; the day she left me alone//

Misused semicolon. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>by the same criteria//

Not being born as what she is now is the only one she's mentioned, so wouldn't that be "criterion"?

>whom ever had created me//

For one, "whomever" is a single word, but "whoever" is actually the correct choice here. It's the subject of the noun clause I've copied here, which makes it nominative case.

>So what brings you here anyway, dad?//

As a term of address, "Dad" wold be capitalized.

>the draconequus laughed//

You've used "laugh" and its synonyms as a speaking verb quite a bit. For one, it makes a poor one, unless the dialogue is exceptionally short, but it's also getting repetitive.

>Who ever heard of a manically depressed robot?//

Ooh! Ooh! I know this one! Arthur Dent.

>Discords disappearance//

Missing apostrophe.

>How long had it been since even he’d left.//

Isn't that a question?

>“It won’t be long now,” Twilight heaved a sigh.//

That definitely doesn't work as a speaking action, since what she heaved was the sigh, not the dialogue.

>For years I had hated that voice; that slight echo, as if two voices spoke at once.//

Misused semicolon.

>destroy//

That's out of sync with all the other verb tenses in the list.

>once terrifying//

>weak looking//
>once gleaming//
Hyphenate. (Though that last one is repetitive with the first, since they're in the same paragraph.)

>sourjoun//

sojourn

>Chrysalis sat on the throne, and looked around.//

That's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>“You do not know that I had changed,” she continued to survey the throne room.//

And that one doesn't even pretend to be a speaking action.

>Green tears spilled from the memories eyes.//

memory's

>Thank you Sweetie Belle//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>even if it were only for a few days//

Seems like you're trying for subjunctive mood here, but this is something that actually happened. Just use "was."

>The castle gardens, where she, Luna, Twilight and myself would have tea.//

Reflexive pronouns work when they refer to the same thing as the clause's subject. They can only be used in the nominative case as appositives (as in "I myself"). So it should be " she, Luna, Twilight and I" here.

>The memories bring a smile to my lips.//

Why is this in present tense?

>Click-clack.//

This doesn't need to be italicized.

>The sound of my steel hoofsteps falling on the weathered stone echo through the halls; the only sound aside from the wind.//

Number agreement: sound -> echo. And this is still in present tense. And another misused semicolon.

>The sight brought a saddened look to Celestia’s face//

Don't I get to see it, too?

>I’ve watched these gardens over the unknowable eons of my lifetime; the beautifully tended garden, lush with the colors of so many different species of flora.//

Misused semicolon.

>My hooves lead me//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>I sat on the hot sand, sinking slightly as I disturb the ground.//

Your tense is really wavering a lot, and I can't see a pattern to it, so I have no reason to consider anything but an oversight. It doesn't change right with her reminiscences, so if you're trying to create an effect with it, it's lost on me.

>Celestia looked at me, and nodded her appreciation.//

No comma.

>Neither Luna nor Twilight spoke, they sat silently//

Comma splice.

>I lifted my own cup to my mouth, and took a draught of the liquid.//

No comma.

>“Sweetie Belle,” Celestia put her own cup down.//

Your attribution has no speaking verb.

>Come Sweetie Belle//

Comma needed for direct address.

>I felt her eyes on my back as returned to the castle.//

Missing word.

>His wings folded back against his barrel; his purple scales gleaming as if freshly polished; his green fins sharpened.//

The list items don't have their own commas, and they're not complex, so semicolons aren't really appropriate.

>razor like//

Hyphenate.

>Hey Spike//

Comma for direct address.

>“So,” the dragon scratched the back of his neck.//

There's no speaking action in the attribution.

>though the anger was still remained//

Extraneous word.

>I’m sorry Sweetie Belle//

Comma for direct address.

>You go and call me ‘Rarity’ when you kissed me goodnight!//

The tense is inconsistent there.

>sixty eight//

Hyphenate.

>I knew he was right, he wouldn’t disagree with me if I didn’t at least believe it deep down.//

Comma splice.

>one-hundred-and-twenty-three//

Only that last hyphen is needed.

>eight hundred year old//

That whole phrase is being used as a single descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>“Sweetie Belle,” Spike reached a claw out towards me.//

Attribution without a speaking verb.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom.

>incase//

Typo.

>‘s//

Backward apostrophe, and it starts the sentence, so capitalize it.

>Scootaloo stood before me; proud, with that same determined glint in her eye she always had.//

Misused semicolon.

>I gathered my courage, and stepped into the room.//

No comma.

>I open my eyes, Rarity smiling warmly at my.//

Typo.

>naked!//

Grab that exclamation mark in the italics, too.

>a blur of orange, purple, yellow and pink tackle me to the ground//

Number agreement: blur -> tackle.

>“Come on,” Apple Bloom grabs me by the hoof.//

Attribution without a speaking verb.

>Scootaloo followed//

This scene is mostly present tense, and I can understand it being different from the rest of the story, but you have a couple of odd shifts back to past tense like this.

>“You helped me get through so many lonely years.”//

Since she picks up speaking immediately in the next paragraph, you don't need these closing quotaiton marks. Same deal at the end of the next paragraph.

>sorry Applejack//

Comma for direct address.

>Scootaloo and Apple Bloom’s ears//

Put the possessive on both, or it means they jointly own the ears.

>Thank you so much girls//

Comma for direct address.

>Dads shirt//

Missing apostrophe.

>I love you Sweetie Belle//

Comma for direct address.

At this point, I have to say that the story had a somewhat original angle up untul this chapter. Seeing mentally generated images of major figures from the past isn't exactly new, but it at least brought up some interesting characterizations. But the whole "say goodbye to each and every one of her friends" thing is a very tired and cliched trope. It's all properly maudlin, but there are so many stories that all do exactly the same thing just as well, so it's not helping you stand out from the crowd.

>Come sister, Twilight//

There's a comma missing, assuming she's addressing both Luna and Twilight.

>the warmth from Celestia, Twilight and Luna disappear//

Number agreement: warmth -> disappear.

It still kind of leaves a bad taste in my mouth, but the ending kind of saved it from being too much of a commonplace story. The implication that she actually has a soul and is reunited with everyone may not work for people who would have preferred an open ending, but in this case, I think it would have made things even more cliched.

Most of these are minor things to change and would probably take you an hour or less total. The only thing keeping me from accepting it now and letting you fix the typos and such while waiting for it to appear on the blog is that I'm really thrown for a loop with all the verb tense changes. I can find no rhyme or reason to them, so I'm left to conclude they're a mistake, and that would take a little more attention to fix.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1115

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

There are a lot of places where you have extraneous spaces. I'd recommend doing a search for two consecutive spaces to root them out.

>were words she heard quite frequently//

The phrasing leaves this with no bite to it. Who speaks such words to her? How do they say them? How do they make her feel? Give an example or two. They'll speak a lot louder than a generality.

>it's harsh exterior//

Its/it's confusion.

>hoping that the contamination from the concrete outside was wearing off onto the pristine carpeting//

Note how your narrator really takes on a conversational style and Coco's voice. So you very much have a limited narrator in her perspective. As such, it's implied they're one and the same. You don't have to say Coco sees something. Just describe it, and it's implied. Likewise, you'll rarely have to have the narrator say that she heard, knew, wondered, wished, etc. things when the narrator can just express that herself. So make a statement here that expresses hope rather than telling me se hopes it. You're forcing an extra step between me and the character that doesn't need to be there. Something like "Maybe the contamination from the concrete outside would wear off onto the pristine carpet." Most places in the story, you actually do a good job of this.

>a look of awe//

Instead of directly identifying an emotion like this, try more for how she acts and looks that would cause me to conclude she felt awe. In a very simple example, it's like the difference between saying she was happy and she smiled. One says it, but I have to do the work to picture it. The other demonstrates it and gives me an immediate visual that I can interpret. This also gets me in her head more and makes it easier to empathize with her. This is something you should pay attention to throughout the story.

>"I brought the costumes," She squeaked//

The dialogue tag doesn't get capitalized, unless you use something like a name here, which has to be capitalized anyway.

>boldly- colored//

Don't put spaces in hyphenated words. Except this one actually doesn't need to be hyphenated. It;s the exception: two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb don't take one.

>chiffon dresses stood out in the room like tropical birds, the rhinestones like raindrops on their delicate wings//

Very good imagery here. Something as evocative might work better in your opening paragraph when you describe the tall buildings.

>job well done.//

Capitalization.

>I don't plan bringing my career to an abrupt halt//

Missing word.

>finished--" She laughed "--This//

You're correct that a narrative aside inserted in a quote doesn't get end punctuation (except possibly for ! or ? as appropriate), but it doesn't get capitalized, either. Furthermore, they really only work when they break into the middle of a sentence. Here, the syntax really places it between two sentences. As such, you might do better to make all three separate sentences, unless you want to move the asde somewhere else.

>That last line was laced with such professionalism//

Go more into how it sounds, because there's nothing here that evokes it. "Professionalism" doesn't have a sound, after all. So liken it to something, use a simile, etc.

>She knew she was a selfish young mare//

This kind of comes out of nowhere. If you want her to be the type who's down on herself, characterize her that way from the start. The opening scene of her walking through the city could have given her this mindset, but it didn't, so it feels inconsistent.

>sketch into a notebook//

Sketch what into a notebook?

>Coco could only wish her clunky hooves didn't get in the way of delicate patchwork ,or accidentally push two buttons when she intended to push one.//

You got the comma and space swapped, but you don't even need a comma there. Note how there's only one subject performing two verbs. Commas get used when there are multiple subjects, each performing their own verb. Like so:
I did this and did that.
He and I did this.
He and I did this and did that.
He did this, and I did that.

>It's. . .it's//

Standard ellipsis formatting would be like... this or ... this or . . . this.

>" Heh/

Extraneous space.

>perhaps she would amount to more than a seamstress on day//

Typo.

>less than favorable//

Here's one that needs hyphenation. You're using that entire phrase as a single descriptor.

>The less than favorable silence was broken by Suri.//

And back to this sentence. I don;t see the advantage of phrasing it in passive voice. It saps the action, and it doesn't shift the focus onto anything worthwhile.

>uh . .//

Missing a dot.

>Get a grip of yourself//

Usually, it's "grip on" or "hold of."

>it. "//

Extraneous space. Suffice it to say you need to sweep for these. I'm not going to mark any more.

>the sharp businessmare who she was dealing with here//

Whom. Actually, "with whom she was dealing here," but it depends on how formal you want her to sound. With this kind of narrator, you don;t have to have precise grammar, just reasonable.

>sympathetic, bordering on condescending//

Another example of a spot where you should describe how it looks instead of just telling me the emotion and making me come up with the picture for you.

>merrigold//

Marigold.

>A twang of childish longing//

Don't tell me this is what it is. Demonstrate it. Have the narrator briefly go off on a tangent about some childhood memory then get jerked back into reality.

>how deep out friendship is//

Typo.

>Muscles visibly tensing up in frustration,//

If Coco can see it, it's implied to be visible anyway. And especially watch out for these prepositional phrases, like "in frustration," "with excitement," "of terror," and the sort. They're almost always redundant with context already in the sentence, like your tensing muscles here.

>overcome with a sense that she would be rude and uptight not to//

Also be wary of over-explaining a character's motives like this. There are more elegant ways of hinting at it. Something like "Of course she joined in the laughter. An intern should."

>one 'em//

Missing word.

>Faceless//

Why is this capitalized?

>"Oh." Was all she could think to say.//

This is a special case, so I'll just tell you that it should look like this:
"Oh" was all she could think to say.

>Coco's insides churned with both the embarrassment of such an accusation and something else which she could only pin down as hope.//

Demonstrate all that or let the narration carry the mood.

>flipped, the fleeting feeling//

All that alliteration creates a playful feel, and that's not what you're going for here.

>S-suri//

If it's a word that has to be capitalized no matter what, then every false start gets capitalized as well.

>missy." The elder filly scoffed.//

Punctuation/capitalization. There's a brief discussion of how to do this at the top of this thread.

>She had go.//

Missing word.

>giftbox//

gift box

>payed//

paid

We don't see too many stories about these two characters, oddly enough. It's an interesting dynamic you've created here. Really, the biggest issues are the amount of telly language, the use of so many perceptive filters like what she knew or hoped or saw in a limited narration, and the need for a good editing sweep. I already referred you to the discussion about dialogue punctuation and capitalization at the top of this thread. The sections on comma use with conjunctions and show versus tell should also help explain things.

The story could also use a bit of a stronger conclusion. She feels very small now, but there was a spot I pointed out near the beginning, where she was being very self-deprecating in contrast to how well-adjusted she sounded in the first few paragraphs. So not much has actually changed. A story's really about change, either a conflict that gets resolved, or that something has altered about a character or the world at large. So what's changed here? Accentuate that, and at the end, make a message out of it that the reader can take away. There are lots of ways to do it. She could solidify her opinion that she's pretty worthless, or she could pine for someone who;d treat her right, an obvious reference to how Rarity ends up helping her later.

If you have any questions, please ask. I'd like to help you get this story whipped into shape.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1126

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>had the//

Extraneous space.

>She should be celebrating with these ponies; celebrating the wedding, and the victory over the changelings.//

If a semicolon is used properly, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete.

>The Changeling invasion wasn’t only a catastrophe in itself, the aftermath also turned all levels of administration into pure chaos//

Comma splice.

>the slim facade of which had been squeezed into a corner//

You'll normally set off absolute phrases like this with a comma.

>Y-Yes//

Unless it's a proper noun, you only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>They slowly walked, just straying around the square.//

It's unclear what they're doing since they went outside. It'd be hard for Derpy to eat while walking, so I'd envisioned them at an outdoor table, but they must have been walking for this to occur.

>mail box//

mailbox

>Thanks man//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Her optimism was gone, and she went faster than before, suddenly anxious to finish off her shift as quickly as possible.//

You do this from time to time: bluntly name a character's emotion instead of demonstrating it. How would she act if she were anxious? Let me see that.

>she fixated the one in front of her//

Missing word.

>but there was regret in her voice//

This is related to being blunt with emotion. How does this sound? What other physical cues might she give?

>just –“//

You'll need to sweep for these. Note how the dash has broken the direction of the smart quotes.

>still flustered//

As you've used it, hyphenate this.

>She was headed towards the library, since she didn’t know where else to go until Derpy was done with her work.//

You're really using an awful lot of "to be" verbs early in this chapter. They're very boring verbs, as nothing happens. The more you keep things active, the more engaging the story will be. In just the first 5 paragraphs, I see 10 of them, and the third paragraph alone has 4 instances of "been."

>“Scarlet’s Sweet Secret” was the title that was emblazoned on it in red letters.//

That's kind of a clunky way of saying that. And book titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>“The Mare from the End of the Street”//

Same deal with book titles. Just go through and sweep for these.

>urging to know how the story went on//

That's not really used right. "Urging" takes a direct object, and who would that be? She's not urging herself.

>“Of course. I would like to see how you live, for that matter.”//

Where's this coming from? Her unfamiliarity with he common folk, or an interest in Derpy in particular? It's kind of lacking in context.

>this fuzzy feeling of in the air//

Feeling of what?

>a single window faced the street which stood wide open//

Sounds like the street is standing wide open.

>It was a lot different from the wide halls and high ceilings that she was used to//

You've said as much already.

>Luna couldn’t resist running a hoof through Derpy’s coat//

Why in the world would she do this? I suspect this is going to be am issue throughout. You've set them up reasonably to become friends, but I don't really get a feeling of romance anywhere. Why would Luna do this? Under what circumstances would she have ever considered it reasonable? She's the one trapped in old customs, and it's certainly not something old-fashioned, so why would she do it. There's too much about Luna's side that comes out of nowhere. Derpy's interest kind of does, too. Why is she latching onto Luna so hard? Other ponies have been nice to her in the past, and she didn't do this to them. It feels like they're being forced together, not developing naturally. Take Luna's interest in lesbians, for that matter. Of all the newfangled things that confuse her, that's the one she fixes on? And not even out of a curiosity to explain any feelings she has, only something she's observed.

>“Bill’s Bowling Bar”//

Why would that be in quotes?

>Derpy sobbed//

Well, that was sudden. This isn't exactly new to her.

>it felt good to be doing something right for once//

Why are you switching to Derpy's perspective? And you only stay there for half a sentence.

>small blue band stretching across the patchwork of fields and meadows. Their flight descended gradually, and soon they approached a small//

Watch that close repetition of words.

Look how often you have these stretches of conversation where there's back-and-forth dialogue but little to no narration. There's an explanation of that in the section on talking heads at the top of this thread.

>“Yay, story time!”//

Okay, making her this childlike adds a really creepy vibe to any burgeoning romance.

>With it, memories came back; memories of her mother, the lovely Princess Laurentia, all-mother of ponies, with her pristine coat and her mane that shone like liquid copper.//

Misused semicolon. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>I have abandoned everything that mother wanted me to care for.//

When used in place of a name like this, "Mother" gets capitalized.

>The gesture felt familiar already; the warmth of Derpy’s body, the softness of her coat.//

Another misused semicolon.

>They were quite soft, but they could never substitute for the mare lying on the floor.//

It's really rushing things that she feels this way about Derpy already. They've spent, what, two days together?

>high class//

Hyphenate.

>scoffing at her as she passed by//

You're really trying to make Derpy into a caricature here. There are ponies who'd have a reason to mock her, sure, but random strangers? You don't want to pile on unnecessary tragedy or hardship. It doesn't ramp up the reader's sympathy for her effectively. More often, it detracts from the story.

>Sirs//

That wouldn't be capitalized.

>Derpy asked friendly//

That's actually not an adverb, so this doesn't parse.

>Miss//

That wouldn't be capitalized, either, unless it's attached to her name.

>the guard didn’t look like he was sorry//

Then how does he look? Let me see it, too.

>blank floor tiles//

What does "blank" have to do with the sound they make?

>Missy//

Don't capitalize that.

I don't get Vinyl's motive for helping Derpy. She just does, and after you've made the point that everyone likes to mock her.

>richly ornamented carped absorbed the sound of their steps//

Typo.

>Derpy caught a glance at the detailed carvings in the wood: animals of all kinds, dancing in celebration.//

Why does this catch her eye? She's never made out to be an animal lover or anything.

>Vinyl gave her a friendly and adjusted her shades before leaving.//

A friendly what?

So there are lots of guards keeping ponies from getting into the castle, but none keeping ponies out of Luna's bedroom?

>and that she felt like not belonging here//

That doesn't really say what you want it to.

>But it couldn’t be all there was to it, could it?//

Why couldn't it? That seems enough to explain Derpy's reaction, unless Luna's suddenly psychic.

>Disc Jockey//

Why is that capitalized?

>And I,” she adjusted her shades, “bring the beats//

An attribution like this needs a speaking verb. It looks more like you want to do a narrative aside. Here's how:
And I—” she adjusted her shades “—bring the beats

>She was chasing a balloon, laughing as she kicked it into the air each time it threatened to sink onto the ground.//

Yeah, you have a very creepy age dynamic going on in this relationship. As friends, sure, but romance?

>it sounded like a hoof frantically, and Luna noticed that Derpy was doing the same//

I think you inadvertently edited two sentences together or something. This doesn't make sense.

>“Scarlet’s Sweet Secret”//

Book title format again.

>to bed Derpy in one of the guest suites//

That comes across as meaning something very different than I think you intended.

>three story//

Hyphenate.

>steps appeared inside//

She can see them? This makes it sound like a staircase materialized.

>It is said that it were easier to talk a mountain into moving than a dragon they are so stubborn//

The syntax is off there, and this isn't really the place for subjunctive mood.

>residence of my sister and I//

People are so conditioned to use "I" that they do even when it's wrong. "Me" is correct here; it's part of the compound object of the preposition "of."

>The Sun …”//

I don't believe you meant to have those quotation marks there.

>steps”,//

Swap that punctuation.

>“Remember, trick steps,” she reminded//

Redundant.

>I like to think that the Ancients made them for some purpose that has been lost with them//

Why would she like to think that purpose is lost?

So I wasn't exhaustive in pointing things out here. Suffice it to say that if I pointed out multiple examples of something, it needs attention. The big abstract thing, though, is that the relationship between them feels so superficial. Derpy likes Luna because Luna is one of only a couple of ponies who will treat her with any respect. And Luna likes Derpy because she's one of only a couple of ponies who don't cower from her. That sure sounds like shaky ground for anything romantic. This story is a lot more convincing as a friendshipping plot than a romance. Plus the numerous instances of Derpy acting very childlike, and not in a deliberate way, create a really odd and creepy power dynamic. They each get some benefit from their friendship, so it's not surprising they want to spend time together, but it's a really shallow basis for love. That would call for something a lot deeper than taking the only one who's available.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1132

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Okay, let's start with a couple of paragraphs right near the beginning.

>Daybreak.

>
>The sunlight streamed in through the loft's window, slowly brightening the room up as the sun began to rise. As the light reached the small bed in the room, the mare within began to awaken to a new day. She had left the window open and the sounds of the forest around her little farm were beginning quite loudly announce the new day. Mother Nature's natural alarm brought her to consciousness, and she rolled over and put the pillows over her ears in an effort to drown out the ever-increasing noise.//

First off, this is what we call a "weather report" opening. It's become very cliched to do so. At this point, it basically tells the reader you couldn't think of anything more interesting to say. Unless the weather is closely related to a plot point and you make that clear very soon, this is empty language that does nothing to differentiate your story from any number of others. You want to grab the reader's interest ad show them they're here for something unique, so don't pick the same beginning everyone else does. Readers are here for the action and the characters, so get to one or the other as soon as possible.

Furthermore, look at what you actually say here. The sun's up. Its light is coming in. The sun continues to rise. She awakens. The new day is beginning. That's a lot of ways of saying the same thing. Finally you get to something different: she rolls over and wishes she could go back to sleep. Get rid of all that filler. Start with her rolling over and trying to block out the world. That would start you off with a relatable characterization and an action.

So that's repetition of information. Soon after we get a more mundane kind: repetition of language.

>Unsurprisingly, a little hiss of tired annoyance came from the little dragon.//

See how you use "little" twice in close quarters? All but the most mundane of words will stand out when repeated close enough together. The more unusual the word or phrase, the longer you have to go to keep it from sounding repetitive, unless you deliberately want it that way to create some effect. Then it becomes a question of whether you achieve that effect. You're not doing that here, though. For example, you wouldn't bat an eye at seeing "the" four times in a sentence, but you'd definitely notice "ventriloquist" twice on an entire page.

Now, another thing about that sentence. Notice how you're directly identifying his emotion for me: tired annoyance. That renders it as a fact, when it should be something that makes me empathize with the character. For the most part, anyway. I'll get to the exceptions in a second. You more often will want to present the raw evidence of emotion, like what I'd see if I were there witnessing your characters. What would I see him do that would lead me to believe he was tired and annoyed? Let me draw my own conclusions. In a very basic example, it's the difference between saying a character is happy and that he smiles. One states the emotion, and the other demonstrates it. We're naturally geared toward reading demonstrations from each other than getting the information as a fact, so it feels more authentic that way. So:

Good: using cues of body language, facial expression, posture, reactions to what's going on, speech, maybe thoughts.
Bad: using blunt emotion words as nouns (his sadness), adjectives (he was sad), adverbs (he walked sadly), and prepositional phrases (he sighed in relief). Those last two are the most common ones. Also bad: spelling out a character's intentions or motivations ("she gave her friend a hug" versus "she gave her friend a hug to make her feel better").

Now to the exceptions. Use this evocative language when you want the reader to empathize or identify with a character. For fleeting character appearances or unimportant plot moments, you can get away with naming emotions. Like saying n passing notice that a kid in the back of a police car looks scared, that's fine, because his situation isn't important, and the story doesn't linger on it. Also fine is when trying to create the feel of a fairy tale or children's story, because that's how those things are often written.

On to perspective. You have a third-person perspective, but it's worth looking at the difference between omniscient and limited narrators. An omniscient one has access to all the characters' thoughts, but he's dispassionate and doesn't express opinions or take on a conversational style. Limited narrators take on a character's persona, and it's up to the author how deeply embedded they become in those characters. It can vary from taking a fairly formal tone still and only occasionally expressing that character's opinions to actually speaking with that character's voice, making the narration sound much like their dialogue.

So when I see your narrator expressing a particular character's opinion, stating her thoughts for her, taking a conversational style, and saying things only she could know, then you have a limited narrator in her perspective. The trick here, then, is to keep it in her perspective fr longer stretches. If you keep jumping around to different characters, the reader never gets settled into any one of them, and it can be disorienting, as he has to keep checking to see whose opinions and thoughts are being expressed. Basically, you make him do a lot of work. So it's best to keep the perspective with one character for as long as possible. That doesn't mean you're restricted to that character's emotions. Just look at the things I said about emotional cues above. Your perspective character can notice those about other characters as much as the reader can, so if you've been in Amber's head and you want to make it apparent Gleam is angry, have her notice him acting and looking angry instead of shifting to his perspective.

That said, you can shift perspectives at times. You just don't want to do it too often or abruptly. So imagine a camera zooming out of one character. The narration gets less conversational and more formal, dispassionate. Then over the next couple of sentences, it gradually takes on another character's voice and opinions. That's how to do it smoothly. You also need to determine whether it's worth switching at all. Does each character have vital information that another character couldn't know or perceive? Then it's probably worth transitioning from one to the other during a scene. Otherwise, stick with one for the whole scene. It's much easier to switch at scene breaks, since you don't have to make it as smooth. Here are a few spots where your perspective wavers:

>Unsurprisingly, a little hiss of tired annoyance came from the little dragon.//

Unsurprising to whom? Amber, no doubt, so you're in her head.

>The dragon let out a resigned groan. He hated trips to town. There were too many ponies that gawked at him, or sorcerers passing through that regard him as a curiosity.//

This is only a couple of short paragraphs later, but this is an internal attitude of Gleam's. Not that Amber couldn't know this, but it's not couched as her reading of him; it's presented as firsthand knowledge, so it sure comes across as being in his viewpoint now.

>he pulled the covers off the rest of the way and burrowed into them as if to hide//

This is in the same paragraph, but the "as if" removes it from his perspective, since he'd know unequivocally if that was what he was doing, so it seems to be from Amber's perspective again. You definitely don't want to present multiple perspectives within a single paragraph.

>as she got up and brushed out her bed-head so she could be presentable//

And in the next paragraph, we're definitely back in Amber's head. Gleam wouldn't know her motivation.

>Her name was Sunkissed Amber//

This isn't about perspective, but I wanted to mention it. This whole paragraph is giving us information we don't need. Now, some readers are much more interested in a character's appearance than I am. I don't care if any of this physical description ever gets put in the story, unless any of it becomes important to the plot (like if she could be mistaken for another character, for example). But you don't want to give her life story in a block of exposition here. Work it in bit by bit as it becomes relevant to the story.

>Opening his mouth//

You're generally going to set off participial phrases with a comma.

>Her adoptive father, an elderly stallion known only by the name of Honor's Edge//

Well, why would he be known as anything else? That's a reasonable pony name, I guess, and you've given me no reason to think it might not be his real one.

>He was getting to be close to eighty summers old and she secretly worried that his time would soon be over. She didn't know what she'd do after that, as her life had revolved around him.//

Back to that emotional information. In a limited narration, it's implicit that if the narrator describes something, the focus character can see it. Same goes for hearing, touching, tasting, wondering, knowing, hoping, etc. It's rare you'd need one of those verbs. There are creative ways of wording around those, and some are easier than others, but for the worry, try something like this: "He was getting close to eighty summers old, and how much longer could he last? She couldn't chase the thought away lately, but of course she'd never tell him that." Note that I've avoided an extraneous "to be" verb near the beginning of that, and reducing those is always a good idea.

>twenty five//

Two-word numbers from twenty-one to ninety-nine (as standalones and when they get included in longer numbers) take hyphens.

>the quality produced could compare to a professional level whether she admitted it to herself or not//

But the narrator is in her perspective, so if he thinks so, she does, too.

>“That's strange, my father isn't here.” Sunkissed Amber said to herself//

Refer to the short section at the top of this thread about how to punctuate and capitalize dialogue and transitions to narration.

>Honor's Edge sighed.//

This is a common thing to do: to transition into a different character's perspective for the last couple lines of a scene. It's rarely necessary and really isn't here, either. The reader's going to suspect what he relates anyway, and it'll play out soon enough. You go on to say there's some entity Amber can't see, but it's clumsily worded, and the point's moot anyway, since she's not there to see it.

>It was a little after noon//

She's been there before, right? She promised to be back before noon, but it's taken her longer than that just to get there, and she didn't have any hardship along the way, so she should've known better.

Okay, that's the first scene, and a bit into the second. The only other bits I'd add is that the writing is very factual. Try for some more evocative imagery, particularly for physical descriptions of setting and objects. Part of it gets to the emotional information I've already discussed, since all those visual cues create a richer scene than supplying the emotions as facts.

There are some more sections at the top of this thread that I think would help you, though I've already discussed some. Head hopping, show versus tell, and comma use with conjunctions are all ones that would apply.

Now, to the good. The writing isn't bad at all. I can't speak to the plot, since I'm not very far in, and the extended synopsis you provided in the submission form doesn't say much. You've created very vivid characters here, though. I do like Amber and Gleam and find their relationship interesting, and getting readers to like your characters is half the battle. Convincing them to give an OC cast a try is rather tough, but that's another matter.

Amber-Citrine SunsetCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1141

File: 1444784391406.png (1.61 MB, 787x1017, CoverArt.png)

Thanks for the feedback for Amber and company; I've looked at it. I think I'll just write for the sake of writing at this point and when I finish Act 1 or Act 2, try submitting again after I do a major editing pass alongside the person I usually edit alongside. I've gotten the Show Don't Tell riot act already, so I know about that part.

You should at least read the rest of what's up there --- Amber and Gleam aren't the only "vivid" interesting characters so far...

The only reason I'm using an OC cast not even tied to Equestria is because I've never watched an episode of the show itself (cue the facepalming and groaning, but give me a chance here). This is a writing challenge for myself.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1164

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First issue: perspective. At first, it almost sounds like you're taking an omniscient voice with the way you describe both Celestia's and Nightmare Moon's thoughts about things. But there are other times where the narrator becomes more limited, expressing a character's opinion as if it were his own. Here are a couple of examples:

>To these words, the Princess of the Sun whipped her head around, only to find no one.//

"To these words" is a very external thing. It doesn't really describe Celestia's reaction, because she'd react immediately upon hearing them. Allowing the narrator to wedge in this comment detaches it from her. This could still work as omniscient narration.

>She could see her reflection in the gold of the throne,//

Note that this comma isn't necessary, since this sentence is all one clause. It's not two separate subject/verb pairs but one subject with two verbs. But back to the narrative voice. It's implicit that character can see, hear, feel, know, etc. anything a limited narrator says, so the fact that you've spelled out you can see it takes it closer to an omniscient narration. A limited narrator would just say her reflection was in the throne, not that she could see it. So you're still possibly taking an omniscient voice.

>She looked a mess//

This is definitely not omniscient. This is an opinion, but we don't know whose. The only character in the story so far is Celestia, and there isn't a persona established for the narrator as a separate entity, so the only possibility left is that you're using a limited narrator in Celestia's perspective.

>She almost didn’t notice it, but as she peered closer, she imagined that…//

Having the narrator take on a conversational style and do things like trail off, get cut off, and ask questions also brings it to the realm of limited narration. So you're already being inconsistent about this. It leads to an unsteady connection to the character, which isn't something every reader will pick up on consciously, but it does limit how engaging the story can be.

Second issue: repetition. This can be repetition of structure, phrases, or words. So far, the last one of those is all I'm seeing, but I'll point out a couple of examples.

>her own gaze becoming a glare as fiery as Nightmare Moon’s gaze was cool//

That's kind of awkwardly phrased anyway, but notice the repetition of "gaze." At least you use a wording that borderline accentuates the repetition, and that's the right way to do it when you're creating a deliberate effect, so maybe this could pass.

>Celestia coldly spat//

>My heart bleeds at how coldly you reject me//
But notice the repeated use of "coldly" in consecutive paragraphs. The more unusual a word, the farther you have to go between uses before the repetition sticks out. In an example I often like to use, you wouldn't bat an eye at seeing "the" four times in a single sentence, but you'd easily notice two uses of "ventriloquist" on an entire page.

Third issue: emotional context. This is the well-known "show versus tell" problem. For the most part, you don't want to supply conclusions to the reader, unless they aren't important ones. This includes the way people normally observe each other's appearance and behavior to decide how they're feeling. You don't know "happy" for a fact; you deduce it by seeing that someone is smiling, laughing, and is engaged in what she's doing. The same goes for writing. If it's important emotional context for the story, then it's better to imply it like this. So watch out for places where you bluntly say a character's emotion, especially through adjectives (sad), adverbs (happily), and prepositional phrases (in excitement), or where you spell out a character's intent, like saying she hugged her friend, then adding that she did it to make her friend feel better. Focus more on things like body language, facial expression, reactions to what's happening, speech, sometimes thought, and in a limited narration, the tone of the narration itself. Those things should do the heavy lifting in communicating emotion in most cases. In your case, it's mostly those -ly adverbs.

>Very suddenly, the apoplectic Celestia’s wings flared. Her eyes were burning with rage that was a white hot flame. Her horn crackled, the Princess of the Sun just barely holding back her wrath.//

You directly identify her apoplexy, rage, and barely contained wrath. Demonstrations are far powerful than narrative assurances. The crackling horn and Celestia's dialogue do well to communicate her mood, but give a little more about how she acts, and then you won't need to use these words.

On to other matters.

>I must say, sister, you must’ve regained some ponyhood because you’re sounding a little hoarse.//

Here's the opposite comma case, where you do have two separate subject/verb pairings, so you'll normally use a comma to separate the clauses. And as a term of address, "Sister" would be capitalized.

>FWOOSH!//

Sound effects don't belong in narration. Just describe what happens and how it sounds.

>The Princess rose a brow.//

"Rose" is intransitive; it doesn't take a direct object. You want "raised."

>“A letter from Twilight Sparkle?” She asked herself//

I've seen you do this wrong a couple of times now, but always when the dialogue ended in a question mark or exclamation mark instead of a comma. That doesn't change the capitalization rules.

>this year’s location; Ponyville//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete. "Ponyville" obviously isn't a complete sentence. You're providing a clarification or definition here, so a colon would be appropriate.

>parchment for the last time, the parchment//

More repetition.

>ok//

It's preferred to spell this out as "okay."

I have to say the visual imagery of the typeface is very clever, but sometimes it's almost a little too clever for it's own good. The joke about "I" for "eye," for instance, adds levity to a scene that really doesn't need any. Same with the commas, though less so for that. Part of it is the way you're delivering emotional context, which I've already discussed, but part of it may also be not delving into the visual enough; I don't have a feel for how this looks on the page except for these bits that stand out as less serious, so if it all did more, then they wouldn't have that double contrast to them.

>Thine words//

If you're going to use archaic speech, take the time to learn how to use it correctly. "Thine" is used in two instances: in place of where modern language would use "yours," i.e., without the object following it, or in the same usage as "your" when the word after it begins with a vowel.

>We wished that we was wrong about you.//

Besides the obvious syntax error, why are you using "you" when you're also using "thine"? (There actually is a correct answer here, but it's one most readers won't know, so if that's actually what you're doing, it'll be lost on most of them.)

Very interesting story setup, and the extended synopsis makes it look like you have it planned out well. I don't see a need to go through the rest of the published chapters, as there are enough pervasive problems here already. That is to say that there may be other issues that pop up later. Be sure to apply these points to the rest of the chapters as well. Aside from the editing issues, the two big things are how the emotional context is delivered, and you need to decide what kind of narrative voice you want to use, then stick to it.

You might want to refer to a few of the short discussions at the top of this thread, particularly the ones on punctuation and capitalization of dialogue, talking heads, show versus tell, and head hopping.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1170

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'm sorry to say, but I started taking notes partway through chapter 1, so some of these will be out of order, particularly for things early in the chapter.

>Rarity added with a knowing glance//

Missing your end punctuation.

>higher class//

>day to day//
Hyphenate. You're using the entire phrase as a descriptor for "clients."

>you tiara//

Typo.

>made up the back room while Celestia made//

It's best ot avoid close repetition of words like this, if you can.

>When Rarity turned to address the younger sister//

You'll normally want to set off dependent clauses like this with a comma.

>You are one of the Royal Sisters of Equestria, this must be second nature to you.//

Comma splice.

>they happen to be that Alicorns that reared Celestia and I//

Two typos there. I bet you'll find the first. The second is that "me" is actually appropriate here. To illustrate, remove the other part of the compound object: "that reared I." Doesn't sound correct, does it? In fact that points out a third issue: alicorns are a "who," not a "that."

>Rarity was left absolutely speechless, mouth agape and irises the size of pinpricks.//

I'm going to go back and talk about perspective in a minute, so here, I'll just point out that you're using Rarity as your perspective character, so the narration should be limited to things she could know or perceive. How would she know what her irises looked like?

>anypony that really cares for you//

Same who/that issue as before.

>the size of pony//

Missing word.

>9:00 o'clock//

9:00 includes the "o'clock," though we'd prefer you spell out numbers. You had a few more places like this earlier in the chapter.

>Your Highn-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs. Alt+0151=—

>happy to get back to her comfort zone//

Don't spell out a character's emotion like this when it's this pertinent to the plot or characterization. Since you have a limited narrator, let the narration carry the mood. You've had the narration take a conversational style in places so far, like having it get cut off or get excited. These aren't things an omniscient narrator would do. So use that to your advantage. If she's happy to be back in her comfort zone, have the narration make a comment to that effect, not state it outright. You're essentially giving me access to her thoughts here, and she probably wouldn't literally think this. She'd probably say something closer to "Thank goodness! Back to a more ordinary task."

So, going back to the beginning of the chapter...

>I must say Sassy//

Needs a comma for direct address. In the middle of a sentence like this, it takes commas on both sides. This was a recurring issue early in the chapter.

>It took me almost three months to get it just right and you've picked it up in naught but a few weeks.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, and this "naught but" business seems awfully formal for Rarity. She doesn't sound that way when she's talking to the princesses, for example. It also makes her sound rather like Sassy, and you want to differentiate their voices.

>Neatly Sassy levitated the dresses onto the empty mannequins out at the front of the shop//

This paragraph is very much in Sassy's perspective. It speaks to her own internal attitudes and knowledge of things. More on this in a moment.

>drew her change purse out of her saddlebags, and she drew//

Watch that close repetition.

>giving Rarity a few precious moments of peace and quiet//

And now you've gone to Rarity's perspective. Rarity was present for the first part, so why did you pick Sassy, only to end up with Rarity anyway? There wasn't some vital piece of information that only Sassy could provide, so I don't see the point of using her perspective at all. There' some more discussion of this in the section on "head hopping" at the top of this thread.

>With the amount of bits some of her designs went for//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>half-hou-//

Another place where you need a dash.

>excitement barely contained//

You're not bad about this, but there are a few places where you directly feed me a character's emotion instead of getting me to conclude it from their behavior or appearance. There's a section on "show versus tell" up top that explains this in more detail.

>Rarity was feeling positively giddy. The Royal Sisters themselves were in her shop, possibly thinking of buying some of her clothing!//

That second sentence is what I was talking about before, where the narrator takes a very conversational tone that pretty much speaks Rarity's thoughts for her. So do the same kind of thing with the first sentence. It blandly tells me she's giddy. Demonstrate it through her actions and appearance. Let the narration itself reflect her mood in how it's phrased, much like the second sentence does.

>she feared that they might still be in the shop when her regular clientele arrived//

Here's another thing about limited narrators: it's implicit that anything they describe is something the character sees. Likewise with anything the narrator hopes, wishes, wonders, hears, etc. So you don't need to say Rarity fears this. Just have the narrator fear it, and it's implie that Rarity does. There are multiple ways to pull this off. Have th narrator ask a question or make a comment that expresses this fear. For example, "She couldn't have them in here still when her regular clientele arrived. A riot might ensue!"

>when I first set up shop in the city//

Another dependent clause that needs a comma.

Okay, to chapter two!

>Princess'//

That needs to be plural. You do this more than once. I'll also comment that you're using an awful lot of "to be" verbs early in this chapter. They're boring verbs, as nothing happens. Better to keep things active where you can. Getting rid of them altogether is impractical, but you should strive for more active verb choice. You have some unnecessary passive voice here, too.

>Sweetie Belle was awake//

Oh, she went back home to Ponyville? I envisioned this still being in her Canterlot shop. You should make this clear as soon in the chapter as you can.

>As Rarity rubbed the grit from her eyes//

Another dependent clause in need of a comma. I'm not going to mark these recurring issues anymore, just new ones.

>a look of worry in her eyes//

See, this is important to the plot. So why don't I get to see it and make that judgment for myself?

>sis//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>Rarity knew her little sister had a heart of gold and would always be there for her.//

That narrativ voice thing again. If a limited narrator in Rarity's perspective says something, it's implicit that Rarity knows it.

>even if you have to omit a few of the details//

Addressing the reader just opens a can of worms that you probably don't want to deal with. This is one instance where it's not even hard to rephrase. Use "she had" in place of "you have," and it doesn't lose anything.

>thing, those//

This particular comma is a splice.

>Rarity understated//

Okay, your speaking verbs are starting to get ridiculous. Read the section on saidisms, too.

>To all things there is a season I suppose.//

Sweetie Belle's speech here sounds awfully mature for her.

>cause//

You're eliding the first syllable, so don't forget the apostrophe.

>"Figures. I give her life coaching and I get stuck cleaning up glass and bent metal..."//

I could let this slide, as it's a common enough thing to do in comedies, but look at that perspective shift. Rarity held the viewpoint, but she's gone now, so she couldn't have heard this.

>....//

Three dots are plenty.

>WHAM!... thud!//

It's preferred not to have sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

There's very little narration in this conversation between Rarity and Twilight. It makes it tough to visualize the scene. Read the section on "talking heads" as well.

>I checked out my first book from there when Mrs. Pennywhistle still ran it, she was always so sweet.//

Comma splice.

>I need a book on Alicorns; their customs, their history, anything you've got on them I want.//

Fot a semicolon to be used properly, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete. What comes after it here couldn't. You're giving a clarification here, so a colon would work, and a plain old comma would do fine, too.

>folded faster than a cheap suit//

What about a cheap suit would make it fold faster?

>"Now, where is that "faithful assistant" of mine..." Twilight asked to nopony in particular. "I have a party to plan!"//

And you did it again, but it's stranger this time. You transitioned from Twilight's perspective to Rarity's partway through the scene, which indicates you have some need to be there. But nothing of note really happens that Twilight couldn't have witnessed, then you go back to her for the final paragraph after Rarity has left. Why use Rarity's perspective at all? You don't need to go there to get at her emotions—Twilight can still oberve her and get the context the same as the reader could.

This is an interesting story idea, and the character work is mostly good. I don't think it would take too much effort to address these issues.

SpongeOfManyColoursCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1172

Thanks for all of the feedback. It'll probably be a bit of time before I get the time to go through it, though I'll be going through the other chapters that already exist and I still have all of your feedback available so I shouldn't lose it.

In the meantime, though, thanks very much for the time and advice and hopefully when I resubmit it, it will be to a better standard. Stay awesome!

Pre-Reader 63.546 Feedback Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1175

Thanks so much for the time taken, first off. I'm really most happy that there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the premise or concept of the story. I've tried submitting a few times before and there always seemed to be a problem with the story I was telling when it got pre-read (I wrote a lot of OC stories in my time.) I will definitely be working hard to get these fixes taken care of, and will resubmit it only when I can get through the whole list.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1179

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The unicorn sighed//

Since you haven't identified the friend, it's ambiguous whom this describes.

>Too many awkward events in her past made the thought of attending another one send a shiver up her spine.//

Teasers like this are rarely a good idea. Listing one or two quick examples will carry a lot more weight than a vague generality.

>unappetising looking//

Hyphenate.

It's not wrong to double space after sentences, but what finally convinced me to stop is when I noticed that it can make the formatting look funny. Depending on the browser, screen size, etc., FiMFiction will pick different places to put line breaks, and on occasion, it chooses to do so between the two spaces, leaving the following line slightly indented. It just looks odd.

>N-No//

Unless it's a word that always has to be capitalized, only capitalize the first part of a stutter. You do this elsewhere in the story, too.

>“That wasn’t necessary!” She shouted at the three, who averted their gazes.//

Dialogue tag capitalization.

>an exasperated huff//

Beware shoving these words like "exasperated" in here. Not only do they overtly tell me how the character feels, but they're often redundant with other context already there, like the huff. That said, you've been using "huff" an awful lot in the story already.

>Bon Bon pranced happily in place, giving a squeal of excitement.//

Really watch the amount of telling you're doing in these characters' emotions. The "happily" and "of excitement" are awfully blunt instruments, and both are redundant with visual imagery already in the sentence.

>Bon Bon groaned in frustration.//

Another one of those obtrusive telly prepositional phrases. Use these and emotional adverbs very sparingly.

>As the earth pony//

You're referring to them by race an awful lot. Besides getting repetitive, it's just not that good a habit to be in. There are times this kind of thing can work, like if there are a lot of characters present, and this is the easiest way to tell them apart, or if the descriptive phrase you're using presents new information.

>As she walked, many of the ponies would smile and wave to her//

Wait, so why were the ones laughing at her earlier? It seemed like you were trying to make that out to be a typical reaction, but now everyone's being friendly. It seems inconsistent without an explanation.

>get - she//

Please use a proper dash there. Alt+0151 = —

>looked up to see Blossomforth looking//

Watch that repetition.

>Now I’ll have to wash everything before I can eat.//

Wouldn't she have done that anyway? That's just good practice with produce.

>with a confused stare//

More overt telling of emotion. I think you'll get the picture by now.

>Now you stop that right now//

Repetition.

>upper floor//

You're using the whole phrase as a modifier, so hyphenate it.

>Giving into his own reasoning, he yawned//

He already yawned. It's believable that he'd do so another time, but unless you call attention to it to make it feel deliberate, it feels like more unintended repetition. Throw an "again" in there.

>I was actually.//

Stick a comma in there, or it feels like his sentence got cut off.

>even a chance to send even//

Watch that repetition.

>unusual - it’d//

Dash, please. I won't mark any more of these.

>the doozy//

Extraneous space.

>She nodded, doing a few leg stretches of her own.//

Look how many sentences in this paragraph all start with that same word.

>about—“//

Note how dashes can break smart quotes. These are backward. You'll have to scan for them.

>“Heads up! Storm clouds approaching fast!” They heard Cloudchaser yell.//

Capitalization. The rules don't change just because the dialogue doesn't end in a comma. You'll need to scan for these, too.

>Letting her go, they swooped and swerved//

Dangling participle. "Letting her go" is supposed to describe only Thunderlane, but it modifies "they" here.

>you’ve got another thing coming//

The phrase is "you’ve got another think coming."

>put through the ringer//

wringer

>They performed another lap followed//

Not sure what you meant to say there, but the syntax is off.

>he felt his ears pop//

That's the third "he felt" in the paragraph.

I'll go on a bit of a tangent here. You're using a limited narrator. The first scene was in Lyra's perspective, and this one is in Thunderlane's. You don't have a very deep perspective, so I can let some of this go, but in a limited narration, it's implicit that the narrator and the focus character are one and the same. So there are a bunch of verbs you won't often need to use. If the narrator describes something, it's implied that the focus character sees it. You don't need to say he sees it. Same here. You can just say his ears popped, and it's implied that he felt it or at least noticed it. There are lots of verbs that fall in this category, things like, wish, want, wonder, see, hear feel, taste, smell, hope, know.

>she rolled her eyes,//

In an aside like this, don't end it with a comma. You can use an exclamation mark or question mark as appropriate, but it won't otherwise take end punctuation.

>A yawn escaped him and he shook his head.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>seemed even her cutie mark seemed//

Repetition.

>Tonight was going to be the night that she not only got over her anxiety, but find herself a special somepony.//

Inconsistent verb tenses.

>She picked up her pace as she rounded the street towards the bakery, she could already hear the music being played and saw a number of ponies mill about its entrance.//

Comma splice.

>had outdid//

Verb form.

>A DJ booth had been set up for the resident DJ to play her music and ponies were already out on the dance floor enjoying themselves to the loud music.//

>Before she had gotten far she heard her name called out.//
Commas needed between the clauses.

>She saw that the earth pony was joined by Blossomforth and Caramel//

I don't see the advantage of passive voice here.

>Their nuzzling constant nuzzling//

Extraneous word.

>looked over the crowds, looking//

Repetitive.

>What about him, Bon Bon.//

Isn't that a question?

>Blossomforth interrupted him//

It's not necessary to narrate cutoffs, interruptions, or trailing off when they're apparent from the punctuation.

>And if any pony tried to mess with her//

In this usage, "anypony" would be one word.

>Get up there, Lyra and show some initiative.//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

>What could she say to the pegasus?//

Look at this paragraph. You're taking a much deeper perspective than you had before. It's a matter of personal taste whether you prefer this or the shallower one you'd been using, but this perfectly illustrates the difference I was talking about earlier. You could have phrased this as "She wondered what she could say to the pegasus." But taking this conversational style of having the narrator ask the relevant question for Lyra gets the reader closer to the character. This is why "wonder" is one of the verbs I listed as being preferable to avoid, depending on how deep a perspective you want to use.

>Her ears flattened at the volume of his tone, and glanced back at her friends.//

You have that phrased as a single clause, which wouldn't need the comma, except your subject doesn't make sense for both verbs. Her ears didn't glance back, after all.

>Two glasses levitated and she filled both with the fruity brew.//

>When she turned back she noticed more than a few ponies watching her//
Needs a comma.

>coat of dark red juice. He stood with a blank expression as the juice dripped from his coat//

Repetition of both "juice" and "coat."

>Seeing him so thoroughly coated//

And even more.

>The sudden shout of surprise//

You just had a surprised shout in the previous paragraph. Not to mention this is the redundant kind of telly again.

>looks. She looked//

Repetition.

>Bulk Biceps just glared at her through a coat of icing, but otherwise showed no emotion.//

That sounds really odd. Glaring communicates plenty of emotion. What more would she expect?

>“Lyra! Wait!” Bon Bon’s shout, but was ignored as the unicorn ran sobbing through the night enshrouded town.//

The syntax is off here.

>She set her case on stump//

Missing word.

>valued/prized//

Pick one.

>gold plating of her lute//

Then why is her cutie mark a lyre? The two are very different instruments. Lutes are wooden, so it wouldn't be gold plated.

>The sad tone with the hopeful undertone spoke to her very soul. She put all of her sadness and frustration into the notes that soon filled the clearing around her.//

See how you're just telling me how to feel about all this? Demonstrate it. This whole scene is coming off as rather flat, because you're not getting me to empathize with her. Show me how she feels through her actions and appearance, and you'll get me to connect with her much better.

>The feeling of hearing the music originate from the efforts of her hooves felt more fulfilling than using her magic.//

You're leaving this so vague that it's tough to understand her emotional attachment to playing by hoof.

>comfortably-sleeping//

The exception to hyphenating phrases used as single descriptors is when the first word of a pair is an -ly adverb.

>to find the moonlight fall across his face//

Verb form.

>the branches of the trees//

What else would reasonably have branches?

>to concentrate on his hearing//

Like spelling out character emotion, also beware spelling out character motivations or intentions. Most times, the story already implies what you're trying to say. But if you think closing his eyes and listening isn't enough, you could have him strain his ears or something. It's just rare that you'd really need to over-explain why he does something.

>He hopped off the branch, and glided to the ground.//

No comma. That's all one clause.

>light hearted//

lighthearted

>As he made his way through the grasses, he found himself being joined by a number of woodland critters.//

You like to use this "he found himself being verbed" structure, but it's convoluted and awkward. You also use "make their way" later in the same paragraph.

>The music attracting the animals as much as it did he.//

You're not using a deep enough perspective to have sentence fragments in narration like this.

>he found the source of the music and his eyes widened.//

Needs a comma.

>as he spotted the mint-green unicorn as she continued to play her lute//

It's pretty clunky to stack up multiple "as" clauses in a single sentence, plus it creates a strange interdependency of timing.

>things cemented itself//

Number mismatch.

>she took in a calm, steady breath//

Repetitive with him taking in the sight in the previous paragraph.

>after taking in that breath he never knew he was holding//

More taking in? Also, it's usually letting out a breath someone had been holding, though that's one of the most cliched things you could have written.

>Her face turned a bright red and she grabbed her instrument and case//

>He lifted a hoof to stop her but she was gone before he could utter another word.//
Needs a comma.

The story here is fine so far, and you're actually building up a plausible case for these two developing feelings for each other. But there are a lot of cumulative issues with overly blunt emotional context, editing issues, and repetition. These three aren't going to suddenly get better in the next chapter, so I don't really need to go on. Just apply these notes to the rest of the chapters as well. If you can really cut down on them, then it takes me less time to mark it up, an I'm more likely to get through the whole thing instead of having to stop at the end of chapter 2 next time. So give this a good sweep. If you can get a handle on those things, I'd happily post it, assuming the quality keeps up.

There are sections at the top of this thread that discuss common writing problems. The ones that would apply to things I saw are comma use with conjunctions, punctuation and capitalization of dialogue, and show versus tell.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1193

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>it’s doing it’s//

Only one of those actually needs an apostrophe.

>goes...//

This is really a speaking affectation. The person has an incomplete thought or decides to stop. In writing, there is no issue of time. If the person decides not to say something, she can simply erase the sentence, or if she can't immediately finish the thought, she can ponder it until she does have something to write. For her to inscribe three dots deliberately, there must be some meaning she wanted to impart by doing so, and nothing's evident.

>Whinnyappleuos//

Assuming you're making a pun on Minneapolis, why wouldn't you end it with the same spelling?

>If I’d known the truth... no, I can’t think that way. If I thought there was a way to fix what happened...//

Again, this is much more consistent with a speech affectation than something she'd actually write in a diary.

>Cider is doing it’s job//

More its/it's confusion.

>I’ll hold off on anymore//

That doesn't quite parse. There are instances where certain words like "sometimes" need to be two words instead of one. "Anymore" is an adverb, and you need a noun here, so it does need to be two words.

>Sweetie was at Rarity’s, they were packing up to go to the big party in Canterlot.//

Comma splice.

>Most of them have already left.//

Different verb tense than you'd been using.

>before her and her family left//

before she and her family left

>When Rarity saw that I had come to visit//

That's a dependent clause, so set it off with a comma.

>hurried out to me us//

Typo.

>say their goodbyes to Twilight//

Fairly repetitive phrasing to the previous sentence.

>there seemed to be a sadness about her//

This is the third use of "seem" in just two sentences.

>I began to wonder if every pony else//

Here's the opposite problem: "everypony" needs to be one word.

>She said she couldn’t sleep at night the last two nights.//

Fairly repetitive use of "night."

>Almost no pony was out walking the streets.//

And "nopony" should be one word here.

>Suddenly I stopped trotting, and had this really chilling thought.//

>My eyes were wide open and it was the middle of the day//
You've got the comma usage backward here. In the first one, a single subject is performing two actions, so it's all one clause and needs no comma. In the second, there are two subjects, each with their own separate verbs, so they're different clauses, which you'll usually separate with a comma.

>I started to shiver, some little voice in my head was trying desperately to tell me something//

Comma splice.

>letting it’s warmth reassure me//

Tell you what. Do a Ctrl-f for "it's" and see if it still makes sense in each instance when replaced by "it is" or "it has." If not, then you've used the wrong version.

>unseasonable warm//

Typo.

>Pinkie would slip me some on the sly, she called them her ‘special’ cinnamon apple muffins.//

Comma splice.

>As she passed over my muffin, I was passing her back her payment when she said//

The "as" clause and "when" clause are redundant in establishing the chronology.

>no, this one is on the house//

Capitalization, and the period would be part of the quote. And I don't see why you put this quote in single quotation marks but use doubles for the next one.

>“I’m sorry,” she said, as she came out from behind the counter, and began walking toward the door.//

That last comma is the same clause issue. The second one is optional, since "as" clauses are an occasional exception. With a comma, they tend to create a feel of meaning "because," while without one, they tend to feel more like "at the same time that" (unless they start a sentence or follow another conjunction). And why is this paragraph set apart by blank lines?

>My Pinkie sense has never been wrong Applebloom.//

Missing a comma for direct address, and "Apple Bloom" is two words.

>And with that she gently ushers me out the door, and I hear her lock it from the inside.//

Why is this in present tense?

>I raised my hoof to bang on the door, taking in a deep breath I was going to demand an explanation.//

I have no idea how you meant o structure that sentence, so I can't say any more than it appears you either have a comma splice or forgot to separate it into two sentences.

>Muffin forgotten//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>I bolt from the store//

You're still mixing tenses. Now, people do really speak like that at times, though they'd be less likely to when writing it down. Are you trying to create some effect by doing this? I might be able to live with it if you're just trying to make it sound conversational, but again, it's not—it's an article of writing.

>I’m galloping just as hard as my legs can go, my speed seemed to only increase my fear.//

Comma splice.

>Anything with wings that have lived//

Subject-verb number mismatch: that (referring to "anything") have, and anything are.

>‘un//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>She says.//

This sounds like it's supposed to be a dialogue tag, but it's not joined to any speech with a comma, and if you pick the first quote, the capitalization's off, too.

> I say “really?”//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>Go fetch me my jug youngin.//

Young 'un, and you need a comma for direct address.

>and albino skunk//

Typo.

>aren’t suppose to be//

Typo.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>As the unending tide continues to swell.//

Not sure what this is supposed to be. It doesn't stand well as a fragment. If you wanted it to be part of the previous sentence, put it with the speech tag.

>sugar pea//

Comma for direct address.

>well.” She says knowingly.//

You're really intermittent about getting this right, particularly when then attribution comes after the dialogue. The rules for punctuating and capitalizing it don't change for that. I'm not going to mark any more of these. In fact, for anything I've had to point out multiple times already, I'm going to leave the rest for you to find. You should get the picture on those by now.

>We are kind of like the pin in the water balloon, everything is all funneling toward us.//

Comma splice.

About now, you've completely lost the feeling that this is a journal. This is a common problem for journal/diary-format stories. She's writing this well after the fact, yet she's presenting lots of direct quotations, like it's a normal story. You can't just call it a journal and expect that to work. It has to sound like one. For one thing, people just don't record quoted conversations in journals like this, and for another, they write entries well after the conversations even took place, when there's no way they'd remember all this speech word for word to record it as quotations anyway. If that's not how you want to tell the story, then maybe you shouldn't present it as a journal. You can frame it as a journal or her telling someone the story, or whatever, but have the past events occur as flashbacks. Then it's reasonable to have it occur live like this. But you haven't done anything like that. My only indication is that the text of your story is precisely as Apple Bloom wrote it in her journal, and this section has a serious credibility problem in that regard.

>“I reckon she’ll ‘squee’ herself if she had a new critter to track down and study.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>My fear from earlier receding.//

Another odd fragment. Absolute phrases make poor fragments.

>youngin.’//

I've already corrected this spelling, but you have a single quote there where you need a double.

>‘HE’ goes where he wants to go, most often he seems to like the North Pillar.//

Comma splice.

>sis//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized. And you're missing a comma for direct address again. I haven't been marking them all.

>Seeing this//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>“Well,” My sister interjects.//

You actually got the punctuation right this time, but not the capitalization. And this paragraph appears to have a little extra indentation.

>caballiomorpic//

I assume you'd want "morphic" as the ending, but why mix in Spanish with a Greek root? It'd make more sense as "hippomorphic."

>D-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs.

>red maned//

You're using the whole phrase as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>Way back//

You're fine in not ending the previous paragraph with quotation marks, since Granny picks right up speaking again in this one, but you do still need opening quotes here to show that the quote continues across the paragraph break.

>right?, and//

Capitalization and doubled end punctuation.

>burnin in the day, an//

You have a lot of words in her speech that need apostrophes but don't have them.

>caballi-whatcacallit//

You're breaking the journal feel again. This is something that would happen if she were interjecting a comment into a flashback reminiscence. But you're presenting this as something she's written, and she wrote this word perfectly fine earlier when Granny said it, so it's unreasonable that she's suddenly forgotten it.

>whatcha//

Here's another problem with presenting this as a journal. She knows that this is actually "what you." Why would she write it this way? It's an imitative spelling for dialogue, but unless we have a very limited narrator in a standard story, such spellings don't belong in narration. You're saying she'd actually write it like this, and I don't buy it.

>She was powerful afraid//

You already said this earlier in the same paragraph.

>Starswirl//

Per canon, Star Swirl.

sugercube//
Typo.

>I reckon she can take a little more rest until we are ready to eat.”//

You've closed a quotation that you never opened.

>mom//

When used in place of a name, this gets capitalized, i.e., "Mom" versus "my mom."

>took...//

Leave a space after an ellipsis in the middle of a sentence.

>sister was crying now, crying so hard.//

It looks like you're trying to make this a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb.

>complement//

You picked the wrong homophone.

>bears mummies//

>cause//
Missing apostrophe.

>this is the worst possible thing//

Capitalization.

>I desperately wanted what she said to be true. She’s the Element of Honesty, right?//

The indentation is getting inconsistent around here.

>Ya’ll//

Y’all

>An then there are us earth pony’s.//

Why is that possessive instead of plural?

>I morn for you//

Typo.

>sadden though he was//

Typo.

>ease his burden//

This is already the third time you've used a phrasing like this recently with regard to the Herald.

>Aj//

Both letter would be capitalized, but why are you just now using this nickname for her, well over 15000 words into the story?

>most pony’s that aren’t farmers//

Another possessive that should be a plural.

>pony shaped//

Hyphenate.

>out run//

outrun

>My diminutive form slipping easily under her outstretched hooves.//

Another odd absolute phrase used as a fragment.

>‘Cider,//

You never closed that quotation mark.

>Breaburn//

Braeburn

Wait, so the discussion at the end revolves more around how Apple Bloom will now take on her mother's identity, but there's little to no discussion about how this means she'll never get to interact with the CMCs the same ever again or how she feels about that? She can still be friends with any adults like before, more or less, but her relationships with any children she knew will change forever. Yet it's like it's not on her mind at all. Wouldn't that be the first of her concerns? She is a child after all, and they think about more short-term needs and inconveniences immediately. The fact that she barely considers it at all just doesn't come across as authentic.

Other than that, the other issues should be clear. There were a lot of recurring mechanical issues, like dialogue, its/it's confusion, and whatever else I had to point out lots of times. Plus there's the issue with it being presented as a journal yet not conforming to its restrictions. You didn't even close the frame on it. Look at the beginning, how she says she's going to discuss all these terrible things, and she's writing them down so that someone in the future might gain some wisdom from it. And then it ends with a personal conclusion for Apple Bloom, not one that would result from that initially stated intent.

There are a couple of sections at the top of this thread that address issues that turned up repeatedly, namely the ones on punctuation/capitalization of dialogue and comma use with conjunctions. Overall, the writing quality was pretty good, and the plot was perfectly fine. It just needs some polishing on the mechanical side and some careful consideration of the delivery method.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1196

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>don’t you guardspony//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Flash Sentry grit his teeth//

Past tense is "gritted." This turns up again in later chapters.

>The Sergeant chuckled//

You only capitalize it when it's tacked on to his name or used as a name. For that matter, why is the seargeant calling him sir? He should outrank Flash, assuming a lancer is something like a lance corporal.

>BRRRRIIIIIIINNNG!//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

>He shivered in the chill air, numbness setting into the leading edges of his wings.//

The leading edges of his wings would he the warmest part. Take it from me. I'm an aerodynamicist by trade. A little behind that, on the top of the wing, would be the coldest part.

>Private//

Same rules of rank apply here. When you use it generically, as in the "a" you put in front of it, it doesn't get capitalized.

>Sincerely, Princess Celestia//

The signature would go on a line below the closing.

>black maned//

Hyphenate, since you're using the whole phrase as a descriptor.

>shafting in through the window//

You just used almost that exact phrasing quite recently.

>He felt the stack shift, and he lifted his head, reflexively shifting to catch it.//

Repetitive use of "shift."

>near daily//

Hyphenate.

>she jumped over the balconies railing//

Typo.

>She closed the distance between them in a few strides, and towered over him.//

That's all one clause. The same subject takes both verbs. You don't need the comma.

>A wave of exhaustion, brought on by frayed emotions hit him.//

Missing a comma in there.

>twined with gold and silver. The token itself was a crescent moon twined//

Repetition.

>It is keyed specifically to you, and will glow when you touch it.//

>In the compartment you will find a deed to the property, and instructions on how to proceed.//
No comma.

>Captain Storm Mouth can be a buffon, unfortunately Shining Armor couldn’t think of a better pony to cover his duties.//

Comma splice.

>but when he thought about her//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

>he found himself wishing he had the opportunity to spend more time near her//

You're really jumping the gun here. I hope you'll build up any possible romance angle better than this.

>Flash Sentry’s ears burned.//

They sure do that a lot.

>You feel bitter, and betrayed.//

No comma.

>everfree forest//

That's a proper noun.

>weather-team//

Why is that hyphenated?

>Sunset street//

Capitalization.

>Flower Shop//

And that's a generic name, unless they're actually so unimaginative as to name their flower shop this. It doesn't need to be capitalized.

>‘m//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. you may have to paste one in.

>march//

Seems like you accidentally deleted something here?

>Flash Sentry slowed to a stop, and eyed the fritter he held.//

No comma.

>He opened his mouth wide and shoved about half of it into his mouth.//

Watch that repetition of "mouth."

>Suprise//

Typo.

>slid to the stop//

Usually, it's "to a stop."

>Woah//

Why can so few authors spell this right?

>He hadn’t seen any wounds, or blood in the alley.//

No comma.

>in-tact//

What's with the hyphen?

>She tossed the clipboard over her shoulder, showering papers.//

You're creating tonal whiplash here. Flash was so serious about it, but the doctor seems to be going for comic relief.

>Princess Twilight Sparkle couldn’t have had anything to do with this could she?//

Needs a comma.

>eves//

Typo.

>ponynequin//

I would think "ponyquin." In fact, if I remember correctly, that's what they use in the comics.

>Canterlot Noble’s//

Unless that's a pony's name, it needs to be plural.

>harm physical harm//

Extraneous word.

>Did I do it Dashy?//

Comma for direct address.

>a path of rounded stones that lead to the front door//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>He reached the door, and pushed it open.//

No comma.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

Lord Sanguine sure ushers Flash into the fold awful fast. There's no tension, no intrigue. It just happens. It's not particularly compelling.

>capture the image//

What image? He hasn't explained at all what he wants Flash to do? How in the world does Flash know? He's somehow psychically aware of his mission. And why is he giving Flash all this information on blood mages already? There's no reason to trust him yet, and he's exposing a lot of what's going on.

>I’m probably helping the murder right now.//

Murderer, yes?

>he looked down at the desk, and froze//

No comma.

Okay, not a bad story so far. The main consistent detailed thing I see is the commas with clauses issue. There's a little more discussion of it at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

Other than that, there's a stylistic issue and a plot one.

For style, you often get into ruts where the sentence structure gets repetitive. It can go both ways, where a simple structure or a complex one gets reused for multiple sentences in a row, but the more complex ones will stand out more. So look at how often you start your sentences with the subject. It's fine for most of the sentences in the story to do so, since it;s easy to make simple sentences do the heavy lifting. But you need to break them up a little more often with some kind of different intro, just for variety's sake. There's a fine line, though. Like I said, more complex structures stand out more easily, so also watch for places where you start two sentences in a row with participial phrases. I saw a few spots like that.

Well, I guess there's one more stylistic issue. You're using an omniscient narrator, so you can't have the wording of the narration itself carry Flash's mood (a limited narrator might exclaim something when Flash feels strongly about it, for instance). So it limits the tools at your disposal to communicate his emotion clearly. You're relying on his thoughts mostly to get that across, but you do have a fair amount of body language in there, too. I'd urge you to add a bit more of that to even out the balance.

I've already mentioned the plot issue, and it's that Lord Sanguine is majorly holding the idiot ball in trusting Flash immediately, and there's zero tension or struggle for him to infiltrate Sanguine's organization. Then Sanguine completely tips his hand, but somehow never really explains what he wants Flash to do. Or if Sanguine is deliberately playing him, Flash is majorly holding the idiot ball to walk into it so blindly, especially considering how exceptional an operative he's supposed to be to even get this assignment in the first place. Perhaps it's an issue of rushing through it as well, but it just doesn't build up that credibility.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1199

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the Windswept’s//

Assuming that's the name of the town, you don't need "the."

I'm noticing an awful lot of "to be" verbs early in the story. They're best used sparingly anyway, but you don't want to create the feeling right at the beginning that the story lacks action.

I'm willing to give you some leeway, but you seem to be taking a limited narrative voice, but in no identifiable perspective. For example, describing the main character as "nothing special to look at." That's an opinion, but we have nobody to whom we can attribute that opinion.

>For those who did know it was considered a cursed place, best shunned by those with sense.//

That doesn't quite parse. Maybe a comma would help.

>vulnerable to ravages of time//

Missing a "the."

>Somepony had even taken hammers to the glyphs carved into the walls//

You said exactly the same thing two paragraphs ago.

>to the stranger’s infinite disappointment//

And you mentioned his disappointment just one paragraph ago.

>he found himself looking over at one pile of rubble//

That makes it sound involuntary. These "found oneself" structures are often used unnecessarily.

>There was a small glint//

You used "glint" just two sentences ago.

Okay, time again to talk about "to be" verbs. They're very boring. People want to read about what happens. Just because there's no motion doesn't mean you can't frame it with an action verb, like "he was there" versus "he sat there." You really need to choose more active verbs. Of the easier forms to search on, I found 74 in the first chapter alone. That's a "to be" verb every 25 words. Given that average sentences range around 15 words, you have one more than every other sentence. That's how often nothing happens. That's really the only major complaint I have against this chapter so far, though I do have something else I suspect will be. We'll see.

The only other thing I'd say is that it feels awfully fast paced so far. You built up all this about the tomb, only to have it be so anticlimactic. I realize that's kind of the point, but the character doesn't know that, so when he's picking through the place, wouldn't he be more cautious? If nothing interesting ends up happening, fine, but it'd at least seem like more reasonable behavior.

>W-What//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, like a name, only capitalize the first part of a stutter at the beginning of a sentence.

>This was bad. This was very bad.//

My only choice now is to assume the narrator is in this protagonist's perspective, because who else would be expressing this opinion at this moment? Yet a lot of the narration takes on a very external feel, like some kind of storyteller. This is what I alluded to a couple of comments ago. The first chapter had a more voice-over effect, like the narrator was some external observer, and he spoke in a formal voice. It seemed unlikely to me that you'd keep that voicing up as the story developed into a romance, and it does seem to be breaking down already. If we take the first chapter as more or less of a prologue, it's easier to swallow a tonal shift like that, but it's probably not something you want to carry into the rest of the story.

>radiant mare answered//

Seems to be missing a word.

>your-//

Please use a proper dash.

>as fast as his hooves could take him//

Fairly repetitive with the "as hard as he could" just two paragraphs ago.

>his horn flared as he pawed the stone floor.//

You have that uncapitalized as if it's a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>To his mixed astonishment and relief//

Beware spelling out character emotions overtly. It's much more engaging to imply them through how the characters look and act.

>the appearance of appalled surprise was very convincing//

Then let me see it and be convinced, too.

>she now appeared to be genuinely shocked and more than a little afraid//

You've really got to show me these things if you want me to connect with that character.

>you-//

Dash.

>He galloped as fast as his hooves could take him//

And that same phrasing comes up a third time.

>sharped-eyed//

sharp-eyed

>If he had simply ran//

Verb form.

>seen what they could do to pony luckless or foolish enough to fall into their grasp//

Typo.

By this point, I'm surprised that the concept of a genie hasn't occurred to him. He seems to be very knowledgeable about these spirits, yet the evidence is going right over his head. Are you making genies out to be a much less-known piece of lore in Equestria than they are on Earth?

>That it was magical artifact and valuable find was self-evident.//

Seems like you're missing an "a" on both of those.

>Curiosity and a twinge of pity//

Focus less on identifying the emotion and more on what effect it has. What would pity make a person do? Possibly a physical sensation, likely express some thought of concern for the object of that pity. That's how you demonstrate emotions like this. Don't just tell me what they are.

>she looked up, tears glistening in her eyes.//

That's not a speaking attribution.

>the spirit bowed her head once again//

Yeah, you need to stop doing that. You can't just join any old action to speech with a comma.

>he waved his hoof//

This one instance feels more like an aside. I wouldn't recommend doing this with all of these non-speaking attempts at attribution, but for this one, here's how to break into a quote with a narrative aside:
“Why are you, you know—” he waved his hoof “—doing that?”
I'm not going to mark any more of these non-speaking issues. You'll have to sweep for them.

>Confusion was writ large across the spirit’s face.//

So why don't I get to see it?

>now looking more puzzled than afraid//

Last one of these I'll mark. These are emotions very pertinent to the story's plot, so supplying them to me as cold facts isn't a good idea.

>But, why did you run from me?//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

This chapter has a "to be" verb every 27 words, so it's still way up there.

>a spirit of the smokeless fire//

So, more specifically than a djinni, is she an ifrit? If anyone would know the proper terminology, it'd be her.

>The stranger’s brain teetered dangerous on the edge of illogic.//

Typo.

>How could anypony possibly bind the infinite fire to a mere vessel of tarnished bronze?//

You're intermittently allaying my fears about character voicing. At times, he does take on the flowery language that the narration uses, but at other times, he gravitates toward sounding much more casual.

>telling her his name//

Why don't I get to know it? This is a pointless tease. I gather you're probably concealing it deliberately, but why even mention it here? You already have the reader wondering this, so blatantly referencing that practically hits the reader over the head with it. It's very unsubtle.

>I can never be free//

It's preferred to use italics for emphasis, not bold or all caps.

>he let out a breath hadn’t known he was holding//

Sooooooooooo cliched.

>I- wait,” he cut himself off//

Dash, and you don't need to narrate a cutoff when it's obvious from the punctuation.

>without even comprehending the fact its own existence//

Missing word.

>“She failed to specify which world,”//

At first, I thought he finished the sentence for her. There are ways to indicate she's still speaking. Giving her an actual attribution, for one. But since this paragraph immediately picks up her dialogue and the previous one ended with it, don't use closing quotes on the previous one. That means that the paragraph break isn't changing speakers.

>Before the stranger even had a chance to sit up//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>the witch that enslaved her//

As a sentient being, the witch is a "who," not a "that."

>fifty three//

Hyphenate.

So, your report for this chapter: 105 "to be" verbs, or one every 26 words.

>The sun is the source of all my magic and so anything that it lacks the power to achieve is also outside of my power.//

Needs a comma.

>nonchalance - there//

Dash.

>more a little prone to mood-swings//

Missing word, and you don't need that hyphen.

>dangerously//

You just called her dangerous a sentence ago. This is repetitive.

>guard with regard//

That's akin to unintentional rhyme. It really creates the feel of wordplay where none was intended, and it lightens the mood where you probably don't want to.

>You not need to be afraid//

You don't need that "to."

>Make a wish, or don’t.//

No comma.

>he knew full well what he wanted, the only question was whether he would get it//

Comma splice.

>The stranger hit something liquid.//

This paragraph gets really bogged down in structural repetition. Sentence after sentence begins with the subject, has about the same length, and has about the same inflection. It gets to be like reading a grocery list.

>going-//

Dash.

>such that he not tell one from the other//

Missing word. And then it's repetitive that the next sentence starts with another "such."

>at a loss to properly describe it//

I gather this from his stammering. It's rather inelegant to state it outright.

>The stranger looked skeptical.//

Watch your perspective. This doesn't belong in a narration in his viewpoint, since it's not a judgment he'd make about himself. It's an external observation.

I will probably forget to say this at the end, so I'll say it now. I'm not sure why you chose to make her a genie, which is something very familiar to the reader, yet decide that would be something exceedingly obscure in Equestria. Why not make up some new kind of spirit? It creates a disconnect that this is a common concept on Earth, yet this guy's never heard of the like before. It's a really odd choice to pick something because of its familiarity, then declare it to be decidedly unfamiliar.

>eyes half-shut and voice//

And voice what?

chapter 4: 78 "to be" verbs, or one every 31 words.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1200

>>1199
Another thing I want to note. It remains to be seen, of course, but I fear for the story's pacing. We're halfway through, and there's not even the slightest hint of anything to start justifying that Romance tag. The way you've written it so far, it's not really reasonable that it would; they barely know each other at this point, after all. But it leaves me thinking the rest of the story is going to be awfully rushed to fit that in.

>the stranger’s mind began to click into gear//

Twice in as many paragraphs already, you're telling me what his mind is doing. That tends to detach him from it, since it dithers about how deliberate it is. It's a good idea to limit attributing things to body parts unless it's truly involuntary.

>to find where the noise was coming from//

Last time we saw her, she was watching him, and there's no indication that the sound he heard wasn't coming from right there in the room with him. You ought to make it clear that he heard it as if from a distance.

>low and her fires were low//

Repetition.

>Her back was bent low//

Then again in the very next sentence.

>but now that he saw her//

Comma after the dependent clause.

>painful-looking//

It's dodgy to rely on a visual descriptor without actually giving me the visual.

>not-//

Dash.

>to sleep an old carpet//

Missing word.

>t-thought//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated.

>I-//

Dash.

>A-Any one of those drink contains//

You have a number agreement problem there.

>t-the//

>c-chose//
Again, consider what sound he'd actually repeat.

>an overtone of desperation//

This would come across far more effectively if you let me see it instead of assuring me that's how she felt. This is a very important emotional moment for the story, so you don't want to short-change it by being telly.

>t-then//

This stuttering problem again. You got it right the one time you said "th-thousand."

>Said grin faded almost immediately, as the stranger tore off the bed covers and rolled back onto his hooves.//

"As" is actually a common exception to the rule about separating dependent clauses with a comma. This is because it has two very different meanings. With a comma, it creates a feeling of "because," and without one, it creates a feeling of "at the same time that."

>for-//

Dash.

>he cut her off//

You don't need to narrate a cutoff when I can already see it.

>can-//

>prefer-//
Dash.

>yourself//

You should avoid things that tend to address the reader, unless you're going to make a pattern of it, but this doesn't really fit anyway. You mention sympathy, so wouldn't it be that he imagines himself in that situation?

>never-//

Dash.

>tears vaporized//

I thought you said they vaporized long ago.

>that-//

Dash.

>cover spontaneously pulled themselves//

Number agreement.

>which he promptly to his lips//

Missing word.

>GAH!//

Italics are preferred for emphasis or volume.

>He found himself pulled gently to his hooves//

Here you are going back to these "found himself" actions. At least this one makes sense, since it isn't of his own volition, but you use another one later in the same paragraph.

>found himself thinking//

Enough already.

>visibly beginning to moisten//

As opposed to? I mean, it's in his perspective, so if it wasn't visible, he'd have to say how he knew, so the point is moot anyway.

>the giant python incident//

Authors love to put little teasers in like this, but they often backfire. Without context, there's no way to draw a parallel, so it just kind of slides past without having an effect.

chapter 5: 89 "to be" verbs, or one every 29 words.

>ten story//

Hyphenate.

>it offered an excellent//

An excellent what?

>There was not the tiniest flaw or scratch on the wave they stood on, nor on any other that he could see.//

/me puts on geology hobbyist hat.
That's pretty much impossible, unless the desert sand used to create it had absolutely nothing but pure silica in it, and even then it would be unlikely. And how old is it that there is no trace of erosion? Crystals have to cool in certain ways to actually take shape, versus being some amorphous mass.

>The two of the appeared//

Typo.

>twenty two//

Hyphenate. And how does he know these numbers so precisely?

>he was not as found of heights//

Typo.

>hippocampus//

I think you're going to get confusion more than anything else by using this term, as it is vastly more commonly used to describe part of the brain.

>freefalling//

free-falling

>this part of the adequately granted//

This part of the what?

>Atop the island, the mare watched with a slight snicker as her screaming, flailing master plunged into the tunnel system below. Then she backed up a few steps, tensed her muscles, and did a running cannonball over the side.//

If he's so preoccupied with his falling, how does he even see this? Keep in mind you're in his perspective.

>The fall didn’t hurt and he had no problems breathing, but all the same adrenaline raced through his system and his heart pounded at high speeds.//

Needs two more commas between clauses.

>This time he slid down the sides of another conical went towards what appeared to be the world’s biggest geyser stuck on permanent eruption.//

Typo or missing word or something.

>whopping//

Whooping

>before turning away to focus on limping onto the warm, dry grass to sunbathe//

It's unclear which one of them this refers to.

>that?!//

What you have an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word, put it in italics, too. (There are a couple of rare exceptions, like if the italics denote a title, and the punctuation isn't part of the title.)

I'm curious how a flame spirit tolerates that much water, or that it never occurred to him to ask. I mean, yeah, it put out her hair, but her entire substance is fire, right?

>cliff!//

Add italics to the exclamation mark.

>She continued to look like a picture-perfect angel.//

Why don't I get to see it?

>warned me//

Italics are preferred for emphasis or volume.

>cyclopean constructions of roughly carved black stone//

Let me guess: you like Lovecraft.

>Last time I was here//

Needs a comma between clauses.

>right it all down//

Picked the wrong homophone there.

>ponies, others or minotaurs or horses or griffons or other species//

That "others" seems really out of place, like it originally ended your list, then you decided to expand it and forgot to edit it out.

>THOUGHT the CITY//

Italics.

>“safe”//

This is nested inside a quote, so use single quotation marks. You keep alternating them as quotes get further nested.

>three dozen massive red and black crystal//

Typo.

>filling in gaps in the stone//

You'll normally set of a participial phrase with a comma.

>THIS IS YOUR FAULT!//

Italics. And why does she need to run? Can't she just teleport them out of there?

>Whatever they might have said next will never be known//

Why? It's in his perspective. Doesn't he have an idea of what he might have said next?

>which such power//

I think you meant "with."

>off their and topple//

Off their what?

>toppling structures had stood//

And a sentence later, you're using the same verb. You're also missing a word.

>372//

Unless that's an official title, like he's publishing it (and then why wouldn't it be capitalized and in italics?), spell out the number. It's not that long: three hundred seventy-two.

>He had been doing this for the greater bulk of his life now.//

Completely isolated from everyone else? Nobody wonders what happened to him? He hasn't ever contacted any loved ones? The epilogue actually fills this in retroactively, but I don't get the sense that's what you meant for it to accomplish.

chapter 6: 95 "to be" verbs, or one every 40 words. Now you're getting into more reasonable territory. This is about one every three sentences.

>looking miserable//

So let me see it. It'll draw me into her situation a whole lot more.

>The stranger couldn’t think of words adequately expressing what he was thinking, and so kept his mouth sealed shut.//

Except for the hanging head and one dialogue tag, this is the first bit of narration we get in the chapter, nine paragraphs in. You're going to lose the visual that goes along with the story if you push it that far. Don't assume the reader will pick up this chapter immediately after the last one. You still have to set the scene.

>If it were unraveled//

Needs a comma for the dependent clause.

>I would be but one tiny part of the star again//

She's never expressed any attitude that this would be a bad thing. In fact, when she first described the sun, she seemed rather comforted by the reminiscence.

>think of words adequately expressing what he was thinking//

Repetitive and fairly contradictory.

>It still didn’t look anything special.//

Missing word.

>If you had asked me when my mind was first shaped from the fire//

Comma.

Well, you're doing a good job of giving her an answer to all of his attempts to circumvent her binding. But since you opened the door to the possibility of a wish being able to change the rules of her binding—she says she doesn't know if it would work, so she acknowledges it possibly could, and if it proves impossible, I presume that doesn't spend the wish—why not wish that she can't take on a new master until she's granted his third wish, and then he never makes one? Or wish that he always be reincarnated as the next one to find the lamp? There are a lot of loopholes he could try to exploit once the rules becomes fair game.

>and his face showed it//

This implies he can see it, be he's been the perspective character. How does he see his own face?

>You’re not thinking not what I think you’re thinking//

Got an extra "not" in there.

>he made another move//

This usually happens when authors write characters sharing a drink. You're becoming terribly unimaginative in what you have them do while they talk. Everything is some variation on "move another piece." There are a lot more things you could do than have it be this bland.

>Djinni loudly ground her teeth//

You already had her do that not long ago.

>The stranger had not lied, her king was trapped.//

Comma splice.

At this point, I'll echo my previous fear about the romance angle. There is a somewhat subtle development of her feelings toward him, but his own feelings are virtually nonexistent until he declares his love for her. And with him serving as the perspective character, that's a problem, because if he is developing these feelings, the narrator would know and express them. It's all internal to him, after all, so it's not like him admitting it to her. It's just his thought process, so why wouldn't that be there? It's not like he's trying to fight it or deny it to himself.

Chapter 7: 97 "to be" verbs, or one every 26 words.

Am I supposed to get something out of that name? A relative of Twilight Sparkle's I presume, but it's unclear how distant, so the connection doesn't mean anything. Check that—even if they were closely related, the story doesn't make anything of it, so it still would be fairly pointless. Given that you withheld his identity so long, I was expecting it to be momentous, and it was rather a let-down.

This was a rather good and engaging story. Most of the issues with it are pretty straightforward to fix. There were a few spots where you're too blunt with the emotional information. And at other times, namely the entire lack of his developing romantic interest in her, it's strangely absent. You love to use non-speaking actions as speech attributions. That was a very pervasive problem. And you're on "to be" verb overload for much of the story. Most of this is just fixing typos and monkeying around with the language mechanics. Really the only story-related issue is his side of the romance, so it's a testament to the plot and character work here that there aren't any of the deep-seated kinds of things that are time-consuming to fix.

There are some brief discussion points at the top of this thread. The ones that might help you are comma use with conjunctions, dialogue punctuation/capitalization, and show versus tell.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1203

Hey, I'm the author of this fic. I've read your review and I'll take a look at editing my story and seeing what I can do.

Perhaps the stranger's attraction was more evident in my head than in the text.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1221

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>No. I’m hallucinating. This isn’t real.//

Why are you going into present tense here?

>From fire and light; my god, the lights, they’re flashing everywhere.//

Semicolons require independent clauses on both sides. Basically, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete. But more than that, it suggests a formalism that just doesn't work well with this stream-of-consciousness style you're using or Rainbow Dash's character.

>Twilight walked up to me, standing by my side.//

Participles mean that things happen at the same time, but she can't walk up and stand there simultaneously.

>She needed to be here-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs.

>high pitched//

Hyphenate, since you're using the whole phrase as a single modifier.

>black plumes buffeted by the harsh autumn winds, wavering and spiraling upwards into the sky//

You're losing the feel of Rainbow's character again. For one, she's generally not this introspective or contemplative, but she also doesn't use words this fancy.

>all-mighty//

almighty

>‘bout//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>Ri-//

>listen-//
Use a dash. You get the picture by now. There are too many to mark them individually.

> Pinkie was dead.//

You have an extraneous space at the beginning of the line.

>orchard--//

That's kind of a dash, but you'll normally have spaces on both sides or neither, not just on one end.

>baby smooth//

Hyphenate.

>remeber//

Typo.

>all of the sudden//

all of a sudden

>I walked into a spiderweb, and felt it land on my face.//

No comma. That's all one clause.

>T-This//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway. And consider what sound she'd actually repeat here. Surely not just the "t."

>ya’ll//

y’all

>I have to say I agree with Applejack on this one, we need to show some respect!//

Comma splice.

>up!//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on an italicized word, include it in the italics.

>mid argument//

Hyphenate.

>This really isn’t right, it’s been a few months now.//

Comma splice.

>cliche//

Here, you want "cliched."

> A low-pitched rumble resonated through the silence and I smelled a fresh wave of salt.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, and there's an extraneous space at the beginning.

> Sunset’s always tense and angry when we try to talk to her.//

Another extraneous space.

>heart beat//

heartbeat

>Oh come on Twilight!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Because, that’s what it’s like to me now.//

No reason for that comma.

>J-Just//

Only capitalize the first.

>She led us.//

Wait, so is this Twilight from Equestria or the one who transferred over from Crystal Prep? I was going to say you had no reason to tag this as AU, but if this is pony Twi, you do. Except I don't see what she would be doing here. To stay that long, serve a prison term, etc. would mean she's here long-term, and no explanation is offered as to why. Making her the human world's Twilight would fix all that, so I guess I'm confused by the necessity of this being the pony one.

>As the sky began to fade to black as night creeped upon us//

It's pretty clunky to have multiple "as" clauses stacked up like this, and it adds redundant layers of synchronization. And it's "crept."

>breath soon turned to fog whenever I breathed//

Fairly repetitive word choice.

>But, no one ever expected that crazy dude to just fly into you guys and cause the whole accident.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>My eyes darted back towards//

Towards what?

>Y-Yeah//

>O-Okay?//
Capitalization.

>Let’s try to be, er, normal?//

Wow, she sure comes down off being suicidal rather abruptly. "Inauthentic" isn't a word I would have used to describe the emotions in this piece, but I have to say it is here.

I see someone left a heavily downvoted (relatively speaking, anyway, for the number of views) saying this was confusing. I have to agree for the opening scene. It should, at least a little, since it's trying to depict a chaotic series of events. The only one that really stood out to me, though, is where you talk about having cocoa with Pinkie. It sounds like it's actually happening right then, but it skips back and forth in time after that. It was hard to keep straight when these things occurred, and who had actually died.

Part of it is the vagueness of using "she" after different characters are mentioned. It's going to latch onto the last one you discussed, so when Twilight had walked up to Dash, but then "she" is described as being wheeled past on a cart, and later a fight is described between Sunset and her, I'm getting a lot of conflicting information. It made it sound like Twilight 's ghost walked up while her body was being wheeled out, or that the fight happened after Twilight walked up, and she was being wheeled out due to the broken nose.

Why is Pinkie always the one who dies in this type of story?

Anyway, the only characterization issue for me is that I can't buy Twilight being this reckless. She's so fastidious that she'd make sure everyone had the proper safety equipment, etc., etc. She might well leap ahead on the scientific front, so if it was her experiment gone awry a la the "Twilight messes up another spell" trope, it'd be more believable. But then the accident itself is characterized as being someone else's fault, right? It isn't clear how much culpability Twilight has. I have to assume it's significant, or everyone wouldn't be so mad at her. For that matter, Sunset is quite the science person, too; why wasn't she involved in the experiment? Not that these things have to be covered. No story is comprehensive, after all, but they get at the kinds of things that leave an incomplete feeling here.

I really like this story, but it's the kind of story I really like, so I will likely have someone else take it if/when you resubmit so that I'm not overstating its merits. For me, the biggest issues are, again:

- I don't get why this needs to be AU.
- It doesn't seem like Twilight would be the type to circumvent safety protocols and laws. She's very anal about such things.
- It's a little hard to keep track of what's going on at the beginning, even more than might be reasonable to create a chaotic feel.
- Twilight's instantaneous transformation from suicidal to okay doesn't pass the sniff test. Suicide is also something that gets very close scrutiny from us, and you kind of gloss over what drove Twilight to it. I mean, we get the explanation, but the emotions aren't really on display. You really have to paint the picture that it's believable and reasonable that she's been driven to this, that she feels like it's her only option. Too many stories deal with suicide in a shallow or flippant manner, and given the age and social issues common in the fandom, it's a topic that needs a really delicate touch. The worst examples are stories that glorify suicide by having someone find their way to Equestria through it, so it does need to be portrayed as something that's a result of being in an unhealthy state (which you do) that's fully invested in the emotions behind it (that's where you need some more).

Also note that you misspelled your title in the submission form, but you have it correct on FiMFiction.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1236

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I asked in a tone I hoped properly impressed how unlikely I thought it was really important.//

That last bit doesn't parse.

>She made peace with Celestia I heard.//

Needs a comma.

>mother//

As a term of address, that would be capitalized.

>I wasn't laying on anything.//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Panic began to build in me//

You've done a pretty good job of letting the narration's tone carry her emotion, like making exclamations when she gets worked up. Do the same here. Make the narration sound panicked.

>I woke up//

You've had her black out and wake up twice now without so much as a scene break. That's a good place to do one.

>I opened my eyes and everything looked a little off.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Okay Diamond Tiara, think!//

In the middle of a sentence like this, direct address gets commas on both sides.

>She's given the rules, and she sounds serious.//

When you go into present tense with her talking to herself like this, it'd do better if you italicized it as direct thought to set it apart from the indirect thought of her past-tense narration.

>I turned away but she kept the mirror in front of me easily.//

Needs a comma.

>Heh... that was a bad joke. I was a holed bug.//

You're giving me mood whiplash here. She was disgusted by changelings, but she's having little reaction to being one. Wouldn't she be too horrified to make jokes?

>Anything to make the vision in the mirror go away!//

That's a more appropriate response, but she's been inconsistent.

>things began to get hot, almost painfully//

Yet she's not really reacting as if it hurts. She doesn't do anything but think it. If you were getting uncomfrtably hot, wouldn't you have a reaction?

>as I laughed almost hysterically with relief//

Sticking an emotion in a prepositional phrase like this is rarely necessary. There's enough there already to get her mood.

>I felt so wonderful a moment before I remembered she was controlling me and I frowned at her.//

That's awfully choppy and not very smoothly worded.

>gave a soft tsk noise//

Awkward. Just say she tsked or clicked her tongue.

>I stomped a hoof with frustration.//

Another emotion in a prepositional phrase that is unnecessary.

>work. She had a good work//

"Rushed to work" is kind of an awkward phrasing anyway, but this is a repetitive word use.

>third rate//

Hyphenate.

>This'll take a while but I'll get you that cupcake//

Needs a comma.

>She slid the glass over quickly//

Needs a comma after this to set off the following dependent clause.

>started in surprise//

Another extraneous emotional prepositional phrase. Look, whenever you have an emotion noun following in, with, or of, you very likely don't need it. Starting already connotes surprise, so it's redundant to add that.

>Peeking out from under the table, Pinkie was still busy making that cupcake.//

You meant to say Diamond peeked out from under the table, but this says Pinkie did.

>I felt annoyed.//

Way too blunt. Let this come across through what she does and how the narration sounds.

>that sent me scrambling out of sight to fix myself//

This phrase doesn't really parse as is. And isn't she already out of sight?

>When someone loves you, it'll feel like something's already going in your mouth. If you just let it happen, you'll fill up, and they won't be hurt. Just don't slurp it down. The more they love you, the faster it works.//

That... wow, that sounds really dirty.

>There was daddy!//

When used instead of a name and by itself like this, "Daddy" would be capitalized.

>He was always doing something//

You use "something" three sentences in a row. It's getting really repetitive.

>Diamond, I'm about to head home, why don't you come with me?//

Why'd he immediately give up on asking her about missing school?

>Did I just hurt daddy?//

Capitalize it again. If you have another word on the front, like "my daddy," it wouldn't be, but by itself, it is. Do a sweep for these. I'm not going to mark any more.

>He easily opened the gate//

I don't see how "easily" enters into it? Is it a difficult gate to open?

>thank you Diamond//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>in full swing of things//

Missing a "the," and it needs a comma after this.

>I trotted out past Daddy and he held up a hoof.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>I felt happy//

Not so blunt. Demonstrate it. Focus on what effect it has, what it makes her do, what physical sensations it causes.

>I didn't see anypony in sight//

Redundant.

>disgust, maybe fear//

Let me see what it looks like. What is he doing?

When she runs away, Spike doesn't give chase or shout after her or anything? I have to think Twilight's going to hear about it, but I also suspect it won't exactly be a surprise. The way that changeling student was set up makes me think she knows about that, and she might assume that's who Spike saw. But he'd probably still react, as he didn't seem to expect seeing a changeling.

>and then foals and marriage//

Hopefully, not in that order...

>I felt my heart thumping in fear//

Besides being one of these telly prepositional phrases, see how that distances her from the emotion. The fear should be foremost on her mind, but it's almost like she has to decipher her own reaction, since she "felt" her heart thumping. It's implied that a character knows/feels/sees/etc. anything that a first-person narrator in her perspective does, so just have the heart thumping. That's more immediate. It also sounds less like a cold fact that she's having no reaction to.

>I assume?" I assumed//

Repetitive.

>I took a half-step back and she raised a hoof.//

Needs a comma.

>We are not yet friends, perhaps would be best not to pry yet towards this end.//

That's a pretty weak rhyme, and while I won't require you to keep to a consistent meter, this is way out of balance. The first part of the couplet has five syllables, while the second has twelve.

>I took a moment to look it over.//

"Moment" is a word authors often overuse. Ignoring those two very short dialogue-only paragraphs, you've used it in three straight.

>It was very brave to come to me, Especially for such a young filly.//

That's a fairly weak rhyme, too, more because of how the words are stressed differently.

>just hold back your love's accrue//

Okay, that's really awkward. It's not that hard to write dialogue for her.

>You will be less dangerous to ponies who to feed from you would.//

Jumbled syntax can be okay for poetic license, but this doesn't even parse.

>If you seek shelter, this is not the place for it, Just remember my advice and do not forget.//

Another very weak rhyme.

>I stared at the spot that was turning rogue//

Needs a comma here.

>She walked towards me and I could feel the warm edge of her love as it came over me.//

Needs a comma.

>She was my friend, my true friend, and I knew it more certainly than ever before.//

You go over how this feels from a nourishment perspective, but how about from an emotional one? How does it feel for her to realize this is a genuine friend? Had she doubted it before? Does it change how she sees Silver Spoon at all?

>She looked at me with concern.//

How so? What about it makes Diamond interpret it as concern?

>that?//

When a question mark or exclamation mark is on an italicized word, include it in the italics.

>But... It had worked.//

You only need to capitalize after an ellipsis if it necessarily starts a new sentence, but this would parse just fine as one without the ellipsis, so it doesn't need to be capitalized afterward.

>It kept me from hurting Silver//

I guess I'm not clear on how this works. Can Diamond still get nourishment, but it just doesn't harm the target? Or can she not feed on love now and has to find some other way?

>We're closer to my house, let's go there//

Comma splice.

>OK//

Write it out as "okay."

>I felt frustrated, and filled with happiness.//

Be more subtle than this. Focus on the physical sensations these feelings would cause and what thoughts they'd make run through her head.

>We'll talk about that, I swear, let's just get inside first.//

The second comma is a splice.

>Silver Spoon looked confused a moment.//

How so? What does she do?

Okay, now I'm getting that the pendant just keeps Diamond from feeding quickly.

>that showed how disapproving she was//

Very blunt. You started with a nice subtle description, but then you fed me the answer. Let the reader work these things out from the evidence you provide.

>mother//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>She looked confused, then surprised.//

Let me see it.

>flattery could distract mother//

And when used as a name, it also gets capitalized, as in "flattery could distract Mother" versus "flattery could distract my mother."

>I let Silver Spoon go and she was quick to nod.//

Needs a comma.

>I doubt she ever cooked in her life.//

Why is she even saying this? She comes across as derogatory about it, but she has no reason to be. You haven't characterized her as someone who feels like her privilege is unearned. It's more a fact of life for her, not something to insult her mother about. I think I've seen clues that this takes place after "Crusaders of the Lost Mark," but Diamond isn't interacting with her mother any differently than she would before, so you're kind of playing it both ways.

>We finally made it to my room and I kicked the door shut.//

Needs a comma.

>He closed the door behind himself, and was gone.//

This one doesn't need the comma, since it's all one clause. There's a section at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions" which will explain a bit more and give examples.

>with fascination//

Let me see it.

>that Zebra//

Why are you capitalizing that? You hadn't done so earlier.

>She frowned with a gasp.//

>I nodded with a smile.//
These are pretty close together, and they have such similar phrasing. It's repetitive.

>She looked scared, but impressed.//

Let me see.

>She looked baffled a moment//

Alright, suffice it to say you need to stop declaring her emotions outright for the reader. Give him the space to figure them out on his own from the clues you give him. There's a section at the top of this thread under "show versus tell" that gives an explanation.

>finely-appointed//

The exception to hyphenation is two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb.

>I walked stiffly to the seat he pointed to and Silver hopped up beside me.//

Needs a comma.

>leaning on her hooves on the table instead of her rump//

Wait, what? She'd normally lean her hooves on her rump, or normally put her rump on the table, or... I don't know what this is supposed to mean.

>laughing stocks//

laughingstocks

>I said in an almost sing-song agreement and we shared a smile//

Needs a comma.

>we slipped out towards my room. I slipped//

Repetitive word use.

>I took the bag from him and slipped it around my midsection.

And there it is again, just a bit later.

>I grit my teeth a moment.//

Past tense is "gritted."

>I made friends with the Cutie Mark Crusaders, my own butler shouldn't be so controversial.//

Comma splice.

>Don't let her hear you making friends with him all of a sudden//

Needs a comma here.

>I wondered about them a moment even as I waved towards her house and we traveled into town as the sun set.//

It's both repetitive and a redundant syncing of actions to have two "as" clauses like that.

>Silver nodded at me and we began to hustle ahead silently//

Needs a comma.

>As we turned the corner, we practically ran face-to-tail into a timber wolf.//

So what reaction would she have? She'd react immediately, but her first-person narrator keeps going on about factual things and the other pony's reaction, which leaves her looking rather unconcerned about it.

>I imagined the big bear that Fluttershy liked to hang around with//

Needs a comma here.

>She had a nice house in the town//

This is rather irrelevant at the moment, and probably not the kind of thing that would be on her mind right then.

>laying on her belly//

Lay/lie confusion.

>The eggs were bland, but acceptable.//

No need for a comma there.

>I wondered a moment how effective bathing and brushing in a disguise was a moment//

First, that "a moment" really feels out of place. Second, you're using a first-person narrator. You don't need to say she wondered something. Just have her wonder it. The same would go for things she might know or hear or see or wish. You haven't been adding "I saw" before everything she describes, because it isn't necessary. If she didn't see it, the narrator couldn't describe it. It's the same situation with "wonder."

>Nothing for it now, we should get to class.//

Comma splice.

>'What country are you from?' and 'What's it like there?!' and 'Welcome to Ponyville!'//

Put those in double quotes.

>That's enough for now, you'll have plenty of time to get to know him better during recess.//

Comma splice.

>yes teacher//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>accepting the reasoning and moving on to lessons//

That's pretty awkwardly phrased.

>I felt a little relived//

Typo.

>mildly comforted that Silver Spoon was at my side//

So make her sound comforted. What sort of sensations or images does it cause?

>awe struck//

awestruck

>I felt a little trickle coming from Scootaloo, was it jealousy or amazement?//

Comma splice.

>Taking powerful forms is very dangerous, and painful, for us.//

Those commas are unnecessary.

>mother almost hurt you all//

In that usage, "Mother" would be capitalized, since you're effectively using it as a name.

>Blunt grit his teeth a moment.//

gritted

>fled away//

Redundant

>But he hasn't been a bad pony so far//

The verb tense is inconsistent here.

>anymore lessons//

You can only make "anymore" a single word when it's acting as an adverb. It needs to be two words here.

>bushes and//

There's an extra space in there.

>Changelings had wings normally, maybe that was it?//

Comma splice.

>but felt something weird//

You ought to put an "I" in there to make sure it's clear who feels weird.

>Flying was fun, but kind of scary.//

Let that come through in the narrative tone. It's rather factual through here, so it doesn't reflect much on her emotion.

>A loud argument began to brew about the idea if visiting a changeling hive was the grossest idea ever, or kind of cool.//

That phrasing is quite awkward.

>tain't//

Given that it's short for "it ain't," you need an apostrophe on the front, too.

>Was it not a wonderful thing, to have our power?//

No need for that comma.

Yeah, the ending was a tad weak, but I can live with it. You do at least draw a conclusion from it, which is the important thing. Maybe you just need a good last line. The only thing that bothered me was that Chrysalis basically kidnapped her, and yet that never comes up. I can't imagine any of the princesses would be happy about that, so why isn't Chrysalis worried, unless Diamond Tiara agrees not to make an issue out of it? I suppose Chrysalis could try to get all involved parties in on a conspiracy to plausibly deny it, but it would be difficult to explain where Diamond had been in the meantime. So getting Diamond to agree would probably be the far easier course of action. Unless Chrysalis had pre-emptively gotten permission from one of the princesses?

Anyway, I thought this was a very nice story and a good exploration of Diamond Tiara's character. It needs a good deal of touch-up, but they're predominantly superficial things that wouldn't take long to fix. The most pervasive one that'd take some thought is how often you directly name character emotions instead of demonstrating them. I hope I've pointed out enough places that you get a good picture of what the problem is, how to find other instances of it, and how to fix it.

The only teo character issue that stuck out to me are Spoiled Rich basically acting like she did before "Crusaders of the Lost Mark" and Zecora's dialogue having some very questionable rhymes and meter.

It's an unusual premise for a story and well done, too; I'd like to see it fixed up so I can post it on the blog.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1249

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>For those who did know it was considered a cursed place//

Still needs a comma in there. It's confusing as worded. What did these people know? As worded, they knew it was considered a cursed place, but then the syntax for the rest of the sentence is off. With the comma, it refers to the previous sentence and says these people knew what he was seeking. I think that's what you were going for,

The only other issue I still see in chapter 1 is a huge abundance of "to be" verbs. I counted 74 last time, and it's actually gone up. I get 78 now. If that ends up being the only major problem I have with the story, I'll go ahead and pass it, but for your future writing, this is something you really need to get under control. Not only do active verbs lend more variety, but they keep the story more interesting. You don't want it feeling stagnant and passive, which all those "to be" verbs will do. It's worth paying attention to if you want to take your writing to the next level.

Another thing I can live with, but doesn't really work if you want to get into advanced topics: I mentioned last time that it felt odd to conceal his name for so long when it didn't end up meaning anything. There's another effect going on here, and it's that you use a very limited narrator who speaks this character's thoughts for him. The narrator essentially is him at this point, and it's not that different than a first-person narrator. When the two become one like that, it's important for the narrative voicing to sound like the character's own voice, in vocabulary, tone, personality, perception, etc. So when the narrator keeps referring to him as "the stranger," it's implicit that this is how he thinks of himself, which is really strange. I doubt you intended that, but it's the effect you're creating, and it's not very reasonable.

>your--//

You use an actual dash at times, like this:
>completely – there//
So why go with the double hyphen?

>lest I should be//

Lose the "should."

>if you-//

Use a dash.

>could do to pony//

Missing a word.

>know--” he waved his hoof. “--doing//

Inconsistent dash use again, and asides like this won't take any end punctuation, possibly except for an exclamation mark or question mark, if appropriate.

The "to be" verbs in chapter 2 are only down a little, from once every 27 words to every 29.

>her orange-gold mane and tail seemed to pick up, illuminating the tomb even more//

This isn't a speaking action, but you have it punctuated/capitalized like an attribution.

>V-Very//

Only capitalize the first.

>I- wait//

Use a dash.

>you can be-//

Use a dash. I was hoping you'd scan your story for things like this. It's not my job, and it takes a rather long time to point every one of them out. I still haven't marked them all.

>shame crept back into her tone//

You're doing that thing again where you attach some random action to speech and act like it's a speaking attribution.

There appear to be exactly the same number of "to be" verbs in chapter 3 as last time.

>the stranger hesitated//

Another non-speaking attribution. How does one hesitate a sentence? It's not even a transitive verb.

>more a little prone//

Missing word.

>dangerously spiteful//

I marked this last time. It's repetitive, when you said just a sentence ago that she was dangerous. There are ways to make repetition work, but just putting it out there doesn't.

>You not need be afraid//

That "not need" is backward. The original phrasing was "You not need to be afraid," so I assumed this is the type of language you wanted, but maybe you'd just left out a "do" instead?

>wish,or//

You seem to have removed the space instead of the comma.

>he was going-//

Use a dash.

"To be" verbs in chapter 4 went down from 78 to 70.

>M-Master//

>N-No//
>A-Any//
>M-Massage//
>N-Nothing//
Only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>not-//

Use a dash.

>he didn’t even manage two words before being interrupted//

Capitalization. This isn't a speech attribution.

>she was still much larger and the one with flames for hair, she still shrank//

Repetitive use of "still."

>Perhaps master would c-care for-//

>Is there anything I can-//
>prefer-//
>I never-//
Use a dash.

>Y-Yes master.//

Capitalization of the stutter, and a comma is needed for direct address.

>she bowed her head//

>another tear trickled down her cheek as her flames dimmed once more//
>she jumped, mane roaring back to life and tear vaporizing//
>he found Djinni standing above him, though he had not heard her hoofsteps//
Those aren't speaking actions.

>tear vaporizing//

She only had one?

>A-Alright//

Capitalization.

Looks like the number of "to be" verbs went up slightly over last time, 89 to 95.

>twenty two//

Hyphenate.

>Atop the island//

This is a bad idea. The story's in his perspective, and this is something he couldn't possibly see from his vantage point, so I called it out last time. Instead of getting rid of it or making it possible for him to see it, you created a small two-paragraph scene in her perspective within a story that spends the other 21k words in his perspective. That's ridiculous.

>warned me!

Put the exclamation mark in the italics, too.

>'safe'//

I'm guessing you edited this directly on FiMFiction? The simple-style quotation marks don't match the curly ones you use through the rest of the story.

>three dozen massive red and black crystal//

Should be plural.

>she bowed her head a little//

Not a speech attribution.

"To be" verbs went down a little in chapter 6, from 95 to 84.

>she smiled faintly//

Not a speech attribution.

>"What if someone wished for, let's say, you couldn't take on a new master, and that you were free from your lamp until you did?"//

Here are some more inconsistent quotation mark styles. Make this consistent through the story.

>she yanked her chess piece aggressively//

Not a speech attribution.

>“Your idiot mortal brain,” she snapped, taking one of his pawns. “Is telling you//

Why would she break this into two sentences like this instead of going back into the quote smoothly? Like:
“Your idiot mortal brain,” she snapped, taking one of his pawns, “is telling you
There are a number of times in the story you did something like this.

You're still being really dull with the chess moves. Over and over again, it's just blandly and repetitively stated as "made a move." Surely you can say a little about what kind of move or have them do something else with the pieces, like fidget with a captured one in their hooves or study the board or something.

In chapter 7, the "to be" verbs increased from 97 to 107.

So there are still a number of things here, the most irksome of which is the use of non-speaking actions as dialogue attributions. I haven't marked every instance of every problem, but I did get most of them. In fact, I'm surprised at the number of them I marked last time but are still there. I'm doing a lot of the work for you here, so please meet me halfway and give your story a good scan for all these things I had to point out repeatedly. It's closer, so you can mark it as "back from Mars" next time.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1251

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

First thing: very few stories get through on the first try. Don't submit here just on the offhand chance you will, and then do nothing with the feedback. Sure, you can use it to improve your future writing, and you probably do, but why give up on the story you actually submitted when you've been told what it needs? I have seen your writing improve over the times you've submitted and through your entries in the write-offs, but there are also things I've seen people note about past stories that you still have trouble with, and I can't tell whether that's because you don't get what the reviewers are saying, you're not using the feedback, or it's just a continuing struggle. In any case, I'm going to try to give you some real advice.

>Those days of her youth she looked back on with mixed thoughts. Some made her smile; others made her shiver.//

This is so vague that it's not going to get me into her mindset or make me sympathize with her. You don't need to give me a chapter about each, but just list a couple of examples in a sentence or two. Just a small number of examples is worth a ton of generalizations.

>a chapter in her life where she'd mope about during the toughest moments//

This is a similar situation. I have no idea what any of these moments are. They may be times where she was treated horribly, or they may be times that she completely deserved what she got. Without knowing, I have no basis for how I should feel about it. Again, give me a quick example or two.

>However, whenever Spitfire's flying lessons were done for the day, something peculiar always followed. The fillies and colts she watched over calmly left the room instead of barreling out with cheers; many of them waved goodbye to her as they left.//

I guess she's not at a flying lesson now, then? This seems to be contradictory to your opening paragraph, though I think they're separate events. You could make that clearer. And I can't tell whether the "calmly" applies to Spitfire or her students.

>know how I can know//

Watch the repetitive wording.

>I adjusted the positioning of my wing muscles while I was practicing.//

This paragraph of her answer doesn't quite make sense. I get what you're trying to say, but her next piece of dialogue does much better at getting to the answer. And in a real-life one, which you get pretty close to, it would be: if your wings aren't strong enough to pull as tight a turn as you want, then you have to take it slower until your wings strengthen. If you could pull a tighter turn than you do, then you're not going fast enough. It's basically the same argument about how tightly you can turn a racecar.

>With only the yellow pegasus still inside the classroom//

To talk about this, let me go back and pull another couple of excerpts.
>It was something Cloudsdale—no—all schools throughout Equestria experienced in some form or another.//
>It was at least better than being the Captain of the Wonderbolts//
Note how the first takes a very conversational tone with the abrupt aside. It's less like a formal narration and more like the character herself speaking her thoughts, so it's not much different than a first-person narrator. I'm going to go on a bit of a tangent here.

You don't keep up this conversational feel anywhere else, at least up to this "yellow pegasus" line I've quoted. So you need to be consistent in your narrative voicing. Do you want something more formal? Then don't have the narrator get interrupted like this. Do you want the narration to sound more like Spitfire's internal thoughts? Then scatter more of this kind of thing, where the narration sounds pretty close to dialogue, throughout the story to keep reminding the reader of that voicing.

Now, the second example shows Spitfire's personal opinion about something. This is another thing that helps ground this as a limited narration on Spitfire's perspective. The "at least" is an internal attitude of hers, so it once again establishes the narrator as being her voice and her thoughts.

So back to the "yellow pegasus" line. If the narration represents her actual internal train of thought, then you're saying she actually thinks this, that she would refer to herself as "the yellow pegasus." That's just weird. People don't do that, except maybe for ones like Trixie.

>Spitfire then diverted her attention to the glass window outside.//

The window isn't outside.

>Floating marble buildings were scattered across the sky outside.//

And now you're repeating "outside."

>The clouds which supported them appeared as soft as blankets//

They actually are that soft, right? And as a pegasus, she would know that.

>These ponies adore me, foal and parent alike.//

Speaking to oneself can be a very clumsy way to display a character's emotions, plus it;s pretty cliched. If you truly want a very limited narrator, though, you can simply express these thoughts through the narrator. Why have her speak them?

>Was he trying to sink the organization?//

I have no idea what this would refer to, why she'd be a poor choice, what his motivation might have been... basically anything that would make this meaningful. Give me a little detail.

>Meandering to the teacher's desk//

Similar to the "yellow pegasus" thing. It's her desk. Why would she refer to it as "the teacher's desk"?

>She was careful not to brag in her response, knowing how such behavior never ended well for her in the past, and shifted the packet to a makeshift complete pile.//

You just used "behavior" in the previous sentence. This is also awkwardly worded. I don't mean stooping to the level of street lingo, but could you actually envision overhearing someone in a crowd talking like this? It comes down to some minutiae of word choice and ordering, but something's a little off about it.

>"That's odd," she muttered. "Nopony usually knocks on the door at this time." Spitfire scanned the empty classroom. Not a single speck of dust or neglected object appeared in her sights. "There are no backpacks or notebooks lying around, either."//

This just doesn't feel like a normal reaction. If she voiced these thoughts internally or through the narrator, fine. Those are understood to take less time than speech. But someone's knocked on the door, and she's just going to sit there? It's not that unusual an occurrence. Why wouldn't she simply get up and answer it?

>sounding akin to a snippet of a musical number//

What about three knocks would bring a musical to mind? Not that it can't, but it bears some explanation, as it's not an obvious comparison.

>She opened the door, the words she'd use to introduce herself were already memorized.//

Comma splice.

>the latter slowly shaking her hoof a second later//

Another issue with the narrative voice. If you want a limited narrator, this implies Spitfire would think of herself as "the latter," which makes her awfully self-aware of the narration.

>She paused once more.//

You go back and forth between narration and dialogue four times in this paragraph. As a rule of thumb, you generally don't want to do so more than twice, occasionally three times. You may want to segregate the narration more or break this into a couple of paragraphs.

>You know how I formed my own flight team after the Wonderbolt's disbanded, right?//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>she then took the empty chair next to the light blue pegasus//

As far as I know, Dash is still standing in the doorway. When did that change?

>into the air the air//

Repeated phrase.

>The former//

Narrative voicing again. I'm not going to mark this issue anymore. You just need to decide what kind of narrative voice you want your story to have, then make sure you keep with it consistently.

>I'm not a bad flier, it's just that I lack the talent to effectively teach you.//

I'm still not seeing any context for this. She was an effective leader for the Wonderbolts, so I don't know why she's so down on herself now.

>My behavior during some of the times we've interacted was—horrible.//

Aside from "Rainbow Falls," I don't know what she might be referring to.

>you'll not get into trouble or act funny here//

That just doesn't sound like a wording Dash would use.

>Rainbow was counting on her, after all.//

That's a pretty abrupt change of attitude from her not wanting to deal with Dash at all.

>It was as though she lost consciousness, but her body kept relaying the information from her mind.//

Assuming you want a more limited narrator, since this kind of is, let the narration carry the emotion as well. How does she feel while doing this? Reflect that in the narration's tone. This sounds very emotionless.

>the idea of revisiting such a moment from my life uncovered those feelings, as you saw//

This sounds awfully formal, like it's a prepared speech.

>"You know that diagram I showed you?" Spitfire glanced back at the diagram she drew, then back to Rainbow.//

Repetition of "diagram."

>How could Spitfire forget those days with Rainbow donning the trainee uniform with the silver—then gold badge which adorned her chest?//

Here, you're showing that you do really want a limited narrator. Having the narrator ask questions is another hallmark of a conversational style that would indicate such. You ought to do this more consistently throughout the story.

>Rainbow paused for two seconds.//

You narrate pauses an awful lot. And why so precise with the time?

>Spitfire knew explaining some of the details would only drive needles into her heart.//

With this limited a narrator, you don't have to say they knew or hoped or wished or saw things. It applies to many such verbs. If the narrator says it, it's implicit that Spitfire knows it.

>I think you know why I decided on him, and I'd rather not dwell too much on that day.//

If this is supposed to mean something, it's going way over my head.

>I said I couldn't accept. I told him I was not in the right frame of mind, and he accepted that as a valid reason.//

Repetitive use of "accept." And I'm not clear on why it would work this way. Spitfire doesn't want to be captain anymore, so she appoints Soarin captain, and he turns right around and tries to get her to do it again? I don't understand the logic behind it.

>Twilight told me about it once//

So the only reason she knows what guilt is is because Twilight explained it to her once? How would she not know from her own experience?

>I'm curious, were they also feeling as though they lost their purpose?//

This is all very vague. I'm not sure why Spitfire or any other Wonderbolt would be feeling disheartened, and the story's not giving me much to go on.

>Arching an eyebrow in the blink of an eye,//

Probably not the best imagery to use when it could be taken so literally.

>"That's it! I got it!"//

There's another really abrupt change of attitude. Spitfire's been feeling this way for years, and she suddenly reverses course because Dash got her to reminisce a little about her reasons for quitting? For one you've really got to show her emotional journey to get the reader to buy it, but for another, if she doesn't struggle for the realization at all, it disarms the story's power. It's just something that happens, not something that's achieved.

So the premise itself is fine. I see there are people in the comments complaining about how the Wonderbolts could ever disband, but really, that's not something that's beyond explanation. If you'd just put that out there, that'd be one thing, but you do go into why. The characters and plot are fine. It's just that the emotional changes are abrupt and without struggle, the narrative voicing is inconsistent, and it's very vague about what led up to this and what it meant to the characters.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1263

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>scattering the light layer of show//

snow

>"I'm just sayin', you could walk a little faster, y'know?" she grinned.//

If you transition from quote to narration or vice versa, the narration has to have a speaking attribution in it. So either add one or make that non-speaking action a separate sentence.

>"You just want to be with her, huh?"//

"Just" is a word that authors commonly overuse, and you've got quite a few instances of it already.

>What— no!//

You've been inconsistent about putting spaces around a dash. An em dash shouldn't have one on either side.

>She waved her hooves in the air in some manner of visual representation.//

That's so vague that it doesn't create a mental image at all.

>Spike grinned, and turned back to fetch more eggnog.//

Spike performs both of those verbs, so you don't need the comma between them; it's all a single clause. You'll normally only use one when the two verbs are performed by different subjects.

>Rainbow looked off to the side for a few moments, unfocused, before following.//

So far you've taken a primarily omniscient narrative voice, and it's harder to portray emotions through that, so you really do need to give quite a bit of context to set the scene and get me to interpret how they're feeling. So far, so good for not directly informing me of their emotions, which is a common mistake. But look at the couple of paragraphs at the end of this scene. There are very few emotional queues, and what's there is very concise. We have Spike grinning, Dash laughing, and this excerpt I pulled out, which is pretty cryptic. I guess Dash is a bit distracted, but it's hard to tell for sure. Give me more of a visual I can use to figure out what emotions are causing them to display these cues.

>Pinkie shouted excitedly//

This is the first time you've done this, so I hope it's not going to be persistent. This is what I was talking about earlier in directly naming emotions. You can get away with some of it, particularly in moments that aren't that important to the story's emotional context. But beware of bluntly naing emotions through an adverb, like you have here, or with an adjective (the sad mare) or prepositional phrase (blinked in confusion). It's far more powerful to demonstrate an emotion through the character's behavior and appearance than to feed the conclusion to the reader.

>frock!//

You're also inconsistent at italicizing a question mark or exclamation mark on an italicized word. It's preferred to do so.

>Apple Bloom began//

You'll want to avoid repeating all but the most mundane of words in a close space. I know it was meant differently, but you just used "began" a little bit ago.

>frustratedly//

>in exasperation//
A couple more examples of where you're telling me an emotion instead of demonstrating it. The latter kind typically comes right after a description that already gets the emotion across, making it superfluous.

>I regret everythin' that lead to this.//

The past tense of "lead" is "led."

>Hey, I'm just trying to be part of his world.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The only one "his" could refer to is Spike, but that's not who she's talking about.

>down, dragging the paper down//

Watch that repetition again.

>our shades complimented each other//

Unless their colors had nice things to say, you want "complemented," and a little later, "complementary."

>gifts with his name on it//

Number mismatch: gifts -> it.

>Spike shrinked//

Shrank.

>Long shadows were cast by the lowering sun//

I don't see the advantage of passive voice here.

>"Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid," Limestone muttered//

You've got her abrasiveness down, but note how she also always had to make sure everyone knew she was in charge. Wouldn't she be barking orders?

>thine life//

Please research archaic speech if you're going to use it. "Thine" gets used where you'd normally use "yours." It can also take the place of "your" when the next word begins with a vowel. You need "thy" here.

>I did not even consider taking Igneous Rock home to my progenitors until we were well and truly betrothed.//

We'll see how this goes, but I'd gotten the impression that Applejack was trying to keep her relationship with Dash secret. Everyone knows, and nobody disapproves, so what's the major conflct then? Just that the Pies wouldn't want her bringing Dash until they're married? They're still friends. Would they not allow her to bring a completely platonic friend. Or maybe not, since this is a strictly family event? If it's that they have no problem with the relationship but just won't allow Dash there until she'd actually family as well, then you could stand to make that point clear.

>mom//

As a term of address, this would be capitalized.

>but then—"//

You're intermittently leaving some of these closing quotation marks in regular font.

>"..."//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing. I get that you're going with dialogue-only opening scenes here, so you can't narrate a pause, but that's the restriction you chose. There are still ways of getting this to happen even in that mode.

>Spike took a sip.//

You just had him sipping in the last paragraph. For some reason, drinks make authors very unimaginative, and they can't think of anything else for the characters to dobut sip. Don't be one of them.

>I don't know what to do if she doesn't.//

Wait, did Applejack not explain why Dash couldn't go? That seems unlikely. It's actually not that big a deal, and then AJ wouldn't have to lie.

>Twilight felt gutted by the silence//

>Rainbow turned to face her, weary.//
These are losing an omniscient feel. Not that an omniscient narrator can't know these things, because of course he can. It's more about how it's presented. Especially the first one seems to be told from Twilight's perspective than from a dispassionate viewpoint. Plus you then abruptly shift to Dash's head. Demonstration helps with this, too. If you describe Dash in a way that makes her appear weary, then it's not being presented as if it's from her own perception, and it stays omniscient better.

>a book the Pies owned//

That's a fairly awkward way to word that.

Applejack's explanation about why she didn't invite Dash is really muddying the waters. At first it seemed like it was because the Pies wouldn't have allowed her to come. Now it's more like Applejack had some nebulous idea about whether it would be okay. Where is that coming from? She could have asked Pinkie if it was a Pie family issue. If not, then what possible reason would she have? The story's central conflict is starting to sound awfully contrived here.

>Twilight flew over to an orange gem//

Pretty much the exact action you just had Dash perform. And then you do it again shortly after.

>not-so-subtly//

You don't need to hyphenate that.

>which was difficult to accomplish in the air//

Why? Also note that this is another break from the overall omniscient narrator. This is clearly the narrator voicing Twilight's opinion for her.

>She'll let you in. I'm sure of it.//

And yet this hasn't been what Applejack's voicing in her scenes. And her family has no issue at all with Dash. So the nature of the conflict is muddled and undercut.

>Her eyes shifted to the window//

You just mentioned both Twilight and Dash close together in the last sentence, so it's ambiguous whose eyes these are.

>last time ah touched it//

Capitalization. I hadn't noticed this problem in earlier chapters, but you do it a lot in this one.

>Applejack thought for a moment, then sighed and nodded.//

Huh? Applejack remembers this? So at least she and Big Mac were born before their parents married? Or that's not their father? I'm really confused.

>woah//

Why can't the vast majority of writers spell this?

>Applejack barged through the front door, leaving it swinging open as wind and snow poured in.

>
>Applejack ran through the night, gritting her teeth and squinting as the snow blew into her eyes. Her legs moved with a desperate speed as she stumbled, losing the path underneath the blanket of white.//
You've been on the verge of this the whole story, and it's finally breaking. Many authors of intermediate experience latch onto certain more unusual sentence structures as a source of variety, but they embrace them to the point that they become repetitive. You use a lot of participial phrases in your story, but at least you don't often have them in consecutive sentences that often. But here, three sentences in a row have both a participial phrase and an "as" clause. Also keep in mind that both of these structures synchronize with the main clause's verb, so you're often having things happen at the same time that really shouldn't.

>tears streaming from tightly shut eyes//

Neither one of them has acted all that upset so far, so this comes across as rather sudden and maudlin.

>downtrodden//

Are you sure this is the word choice you meant? Maybe it's a local expression? It wouldn't seem to fit.

That ending didn't exactly come to a conclusion. Sure, both of them have overcome their fear, but it's not like they dealt with the root cause of it, either. There were several reasons given: that the Pies might not accept Dash being there, that Applejack was afraid of considering her part of the family prematurely. But neither of those got resolved. The first just goes away, and the second presumably gets dealt with off camera, so it leaves everything feeling nebulous. They really wanted to see each other, and they got to, but are any of their problems really solved? We don't know, which saps the story of its power. That's why the reader's here, to see this play out, but it never happens. It's also odd that Dash is the one who goes running for Applejack when the story took us through considerably less of her turmoil. She comes across as feeling more angry at being left out, so her transition from that to flying off to the rock farm probably needs a little more fleshing out.

On the other hand, this is a good example of a story that dosn't have to lead the reader through the development of their relationship. Too many shipping stories ask the reader to accept the pair as a given, and in many of them, the whole point of the story is to get the couple together, so they don't even justify their own premise. But the other kind of story is showing them well afterward, where you only have to demonstrate they love each other by having them do the little endearing things that couples do, so you're good on that front.

These are by no means insurmountable problems, and I don't actually think it would take all that much work to address them. The framework is there, and it's not a bad story. I could see it making the blog, so I'd encourage you to go through it with these suggestions in mind. Keep in mind that for many of them, I only marked the first one or two instances as examples, so you'll need to sweep through the whole story for them.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1275

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Ting!//

It's preferred not to have sound effects in narration.

>Sorry about that, I didn’t hear you out here//

Comma splice.

>the faint lines of stress and fatigue were under her eyes//

That's a bit direct, but your use of "the" here is really awkward, as if Cheerilee expected them to be there or was about to giv som further explanation of them.

>back and get that for you,” Pinkie said as she raced back//

>looked. Instead, she chose to look//
Watch repeating most words in a close space like this.

>I almost pulled a muscle in my back from that, can you believe it?//

Comma splice.

>Cheerilee walked into her room//

Fairly repetitive with how you started the last paragraph.

>I wonder what this Marble Pie looks like, anyway. Come to think of it, Cheerilee hadn’t ever seen a picture of this mare.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt if you think it actually adds something to the story to present it this way, but it's often an odd thing to see a limited narrator relay quoted thoughts. There are specific times where it can be necessary, but I don't see it here. The narrator's already stating her thoughts for her, so it's not changing anything to give it as a quote, most of the time. If instead of a quote, you had the narrator say "What did this Marble Pie look like, anyway?" it gets the same mood and information across, but it lets us right into Cheerilee's head, which is consistent with your choice of a limited narrator. By making it a quote, you're inserting another step between the reader and the character that doesn't need to be there. You're having the narrator essentially overhear Cheerilee's thought and repeat it to the reader instead of having the narrator be Cheerilee. It's a fine line, but it does affect how closely the reader will identify with her. You do great through the rest of the paragraph. I don't understand what kind of distinction you're trying to make by having them differ in presentation.

>raged through the night, lashing the island with its howling winds and raging//

Watch that repetition again.

>“What do we have, an hour left? Right then, instead of the science lecture, I have a surprise for you!”//

This left me confused. I'd recommend putting a speech attribution after that first sentence of the quote and indicate her audience. It's clearer if you read from chapter 1 to chapter 2 without a break, but you can't assume that.

>getting the treats, knowing that they had worked so hard to get them//

Repetitive. Also, consider how close a limited narrator you're using. The narrator basically is Cheerilee, and it's barely different from a first-person narrator. Thus, it's implied that they have the same experience. For instance, the narrator is rarely justified in saying that the perspective character sees something. The fact that the narrator describes it already implies that the character sees it. They have the same experiences, after all. So you don't hve to tell me what Cheerilee knows here. Since the limited narrator says it, Cheerilee has to know it. So just say the kids had worked hard. There are a lot of verbs that this is true of, but they're all similar in that they relate perceiving or knowledge, so things like wish, hope, want, wonder, think, know, see, hear, taste, touch, etc.

>However fast they went to line up, the class formed a line in a matter of seconds.//

The way you worded the first part, it makes it sound like the second would tend to contradict it, but they actually meet expectations.

>Cutie Mark Crusaders and Diamond Tiara//

And not Silver Spoon too?

>The classroom was starting to feel like a prison to her//

How so? Just because of her thoughts about Big Mac? This doesn't really get explained.

>she’d been antsy, almost to the point of nervousness//

Give me a couple of examples. It makes it a lot easier to relate to her.

>After she locked the classroom up behind herself//

Pretty much the exact phrasing you just used a paragraph ago.

>houses were still decorated from the holiday season, and coupled with the snow on the roofs made them look reminiscent of gingerbread houses//

Watch that repetition.

>nearly-fateful//

You don't need to hyphenate a two-word phrase beginning with an -ly adverb.

>Again, her awareness of the outside world gave way as she became lost in thought.//

And yet this makes it sound like she's very much aware of it. Keep in mind what I said about her perceptions and the narrator's being the same. So when we get such an analytical statement from a very outside-observer perspective, it doesn't match the mindset of someone succumbing to daydreams.

>Broad shoulders; thick, rippling muscles from working the fields; green eyes so deep and thoughtful that she could just lose herself in them//

You only use semicolons to separate list items when the items have their own internal commas.

>leftover Zap Apple Jam that hadn’t sold in the usual rush//

Why in the world wouldn't they have sold out of that?

>And behind that counter was none other than the object of her thoughts; the Apple of her mind’s eye himself, Big Macintosh.//

This comes three paragraphs after this:
>He’s right in front of me.//
You even have that one as its own paragraph, which makes it some big momentous thing. Yet it takes her three paragraphs to have a reaction to it. That doesn't ring true.

>Cheerilee’s mind was grasping for traction, looking for a solution and only coming up with questions.//

Your narrator's taking a very external feel again, calmly stating facts that wouldn't be occurring to Cheerilee, since she's overwhelmed at the moment.

>as she noticed Cheerilee’s nervous, frazzled appearance//

This really smacks of being in Nook's perspective.

>She closed the door behind her friend//

This is rather external to Cheerilee as well. You had to start the chapter in Cheerilee's viewpoint, as Nook wasn't there yet, but ever since Nook answered the door, you really seem to want to go to her perspective. If that's what you want, then why not cut the part before she answers the door? Then you can be in Nook's head consistently?

>ears laying back//

Lay/lie conclusion.

>closing her eyes and clasping her hooves in front of her face, blowing a puff of air into her bangs in frustration.//

So you've crammed three participial phrases and a very telly prepositional phrase into a single sentence.

>Cheerilee decided to try and think of anything besides her current dilemma//

Okay, now you've migrated back to Cheerliee's perspective.

>a faint blush tinging her cheeks//

It's in her perspective. She might think she's blushing by the warm feeling or by Nook's reaction, but she wouldn't be able to describe the appearance, because she can't see it.

>feeling very conscious of how her students felt//

Watch the repetition.

>between you and I//

A common mistake. It's "between you and me." "You and I" is equivalent to "we." "You and me" is equivalent to "us." Which sounds correct, "between we" or "between us"?

>Cheerilee trailed off//

I know. I see the ellipsis. This is redundant.

>neither of them really having a specific destination in mind//

This is Cheerilee's reminiscence. How would she know what Big Mac was thinking? You do something like this a couple times in this flashback.

>She was about to tap his hoof before//

She just did so.

>Silence overtook the orchard once again//

You're using some variation on "silent" quite a lot in this scene.

>I…I agree//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>continue. Finally, Cheerilee tried to continue//

More repetition. Maybe it's just because the previous chapters were a lot shorter, but I'm seeing a lot more careless errors like this in chapter 3.

>We just went on with life as if it hadn’t ever happened//

This part of the conversation keeps saying the same few things over and over.

>seemingly silencing all background noises//

It either did or it didn't. This isn't the kind of thing where "seem" would really enter into it.

>She looked down at the floor//

Third use of "look" in the last three paragraphs.

>Finally, after several minutes, Cheerilee finally looked//

So, "finally," you say?

>in anxiety//

You really need to stop using these kinds of emotion-revealing prepositional phrases.

>She stepped into the foyer and draped her scarf on the hook, walking slowly into the kitchen where she flipped on the lights with little enthusiasm.//

Note that participles mean that things happens simultaneously. It's unlikely she'd hang up her scarf while walking.

>She made her way to the fridge, pulling the door open//

Likewise, she wouldn't open the door until she'd already made her way there.

>that was more of an afterthought//

Awkwardly interjected. I wouldn't even bother saying this.

>table and hunched over the table, resting one elbow on the table//

C'mon.

>She pressed the fork against the frog of her hoof, the little bit of magic in her hooves grabbing hold of the utensil.//

Really awkward phrasing.

>She peeled the foil wrapping back from the slice of cake//

This paragraph has four uses each of "slice" and "layer."

>Cheerilee wondered what that layer would be like.//

And the following sentence says the same thing.

>This too would pass is she was strong.//

Typo.

Okay, I'm bailing out here. This chapter is in much worse shape than the first two. It's got a lot of blunt and inelegant emotional information, and it has lots of problems with repetition and awkward phrasings. I don't see any character or plot problems, which are tougher to fix, but this really needs a good revision pass. I like the idea for the story, but the word- and sentence-level issues are just making it tough to get through.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1278

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She cursed this world; cursed the years of doldrum for dulling her senses.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace it with a period and have both parts stand as complete sentences. And it's "doldrums."

>And then this one here, she gritted her teeth.//

You have that punctuated/capitalized as if it were a speech attribution, but you have no speaking verb. You can't just tack any given action onto speech.

>it was her who//

Technically, "it was she."

>of rage//

These kinds of prepositional phrases that directly name an emotion or attitude are rarely necessary, and they're almost always redundant with some emotional cue already in the sentence.

>a reflection, she grimaced, of the hollow place where her song once swelled.//

That "she grimaced" feels really out of place. It seems like it's trying to be a thought tag, but it's really more of a parenthetical element that doesn't fit the syntax very well.

>Looking down, she grimaced and set to walking again.//

I'm only 700 words or so into the story, and she's already grimaced four times.

>she thought through gritted teeth//

How do you think through teeth? Speak, sure, but think?

>Not any more.//

In this instance, you need "anymore" to be one word. As two words, they need a noun to modify. As one, it's an adverb modifying the implied verb from the previous sentence.

>The flame of her rising anger snuffed out in the wind and her hands went limp.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Adagio had awoken late this morning to its memory pounding in her head.//

She's pretty bland about this. How did the memory make her feel?

>For she knew//

Be careful about stating what's already implied. Because you're using a close limited narrator, it's already understood that if the narrator says something, the character sees, knows, wonders, hopes... whatever the appropriate verb. The narrator can't say anything the character doesn't know, so you don't need to point that out. Doing so adds another step between the reader and the character that doesn't need to be there.

>as she and Sonata walked out behind them//

You're using a lot of these "as" clauses lately, and it's getting a bit repetitive.

>to be look of genuine, affectionate—pity?//

Missing a word in there, and this is really repetitive with your phrasing of the same type in the last paragraph.

>She winced her eyes open//

Not sure what you were trying to say there. "Wince" is intransitive.

>with an expression of sincerity//

And what does that look like? You're making me do the work for you.

>Adagio had seen in her a genuine contentedness that hadn’t been there before//

You're kind of playing both sides of the coin for Adagio here, and it's undercutting the conflict. She's at once mad at them and calmly rational about it. I'd expect more that she'd either be in complete denial and ranting internally about this or fighting against realizing the truth. As it is, she seems to have this weird free-floating anger that's not directed at the problem that she does notice is there. It creates a strange disconnect.

>She had begun to carry herself with a new measure of confidence.//

Back this up. An example or two will speak far louder than a generality.

>We tasted that Equestrian magic//

Man, this is sounding much more like a rehearsed speech than some off-the-cuff dialogue. You're losing the feeling that this is an authentic conversation.

>Looking down at the floor again//

These actions have happened in the last five paragraphs: staring down, looked up, looking, looked, looking down. Then two paragraphs later, another "looked." That's a common word for writers to overuse. You have 22 in the chapter, with 15 of them in the first 21 paragraphs. You especially don't want to create a sense of repetition as the reader's first impression of the chapter, though repetition anywhere can be bad, unless it creates a thematic effect.

>She speculated that this feeling and the memory that accompanied it had been suppressed all these centuries by the magic of the pendant itself.//

See how factual that sounds? You're distancing her so much from the emotions surrounding it that you're making it difficult to connect with her. It leaves her seeming like she doesn't actually care that much about it. Link it to some physical sensation, some image going through her mind to bring it alive.

>dimly-lit//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word descriptors when the first is an -ly adverb. But this phrase is a cliched oxymoron anyway.

>Please Adagio//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Well, Sonata has always been Sonata//

Inconsistent tense, but I'd bet that's just a typo.

>putting a hand on Adagio’s knee//

She just knee-grabbed Sonata. Is she obsessed with them or something?

>Closing her eyes again, she sat for a while and let it flow around her.//

Here's another danger to all the participles you use: they can break, and having so many increases the odds that you will do so. They synchronize events, but she's not closing her eyes the entire time she sits there, just at the beginning, then they remain closed.

>She fell back against the wall and steadied herself with one hand, placing the other over her heart as she gasped for breath.//

This paragraph of five sentences has three "as" clauses. It's pretty repetitive in structure.

>clear innocent//

These are coordinate adjectives (it's not a foolproof test, but you could add "and" between them without sounding too awkward), so they take a comma between them.

>in an unfamiliar expression of emotion//

I have no idea what this means. The two are displaying emotions through their singing? What's Adagio's evidence of that? Show me that, and it'll carry a lot more weight than the narrator's assurance.

>Leaning her head back against the wall, her breath came more rapidly//

And you broke a participle in a different way. Adagio is leaning her head back, but she doesn't appear in the clause. This explicitly says her breath leaned her head back.

>as a familiar coil of anger began to rise//

Just to illustrate, you have 29 instances of "as" in the chapter. Not all will be used as conjunctions, but it still goes to show how often you're using that structure. That's about four per page (well, FiMFic doesn't do pages, but in GDocs equivalent), which wouldn't sound so bad if they were spread out evenly. You tend to use them in clusters, though, so the reader gets a lot at once.

>long slow//

Coordinate adjectives again.

>Perhaps they thought I wasn’t ready yet.//

Or perhaps they'd been telling her, and she wasn't listening...

>hope//

She hadn't really characterized it as such so far, so I'm not sure how she's drawing that conclusion. Though that might take care of itself if you take my suggestion about linking her emotional responses to physical reactions and mental imagery instead of making them sound like she's reading them from a textbook.

>she wondered//

Like the comment I'd made earlier about it being implied that she has the same perception as the narrator, I'd recommend cutting this. The fact that the narrator presented the thought already means it was Adagio wondering it.

>The wall in her mind crumbled further and small cracks began to form.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>The spark of light flared and the voice retreated.//

Needs a comma. And this is a big emotional crux of the story. Yet the narrator sounds so lifeless. Bring this alive.

You've chosen a very limited narration, which is barely different from first person. Just like a first-person narrator speaks the character's thoughts, so too can a close limited third-person narrator, just with a different choice of pronouns. Other than that, you can do all the same things. The narrator can sound conversational, ask questions, get interrupted. It's basically the character's internal train of thought. So take advantage of that. If she's upset, make the narrator sound upset. If she's dumbfounded, make the narrator fumble for words. If she's angry, make the narrator shout. Have the narrator reflect her mood, not only in what's said, but how it's said.

>Her mind let go and the light grew brighter.//

Needs a comma. And how does this feel to her? Get the reader to feel it right along with her. This isn't very evocative.

>her sobbing took on a tone of regret, recalling the disdain she’d harbored for so long toward her companions//

Another of these broken participles of the dangling type. This says her tone recalled the disdain, not that she did. This also sounds like a strangely external viewpoint, which clashes with the limited perspective. She's sobbing on the floor. She's not going to be cognizant of much else than her immediate emotional state, so is she really going to have the wherewithal to analyze the tone of it and call it regret? She may still identify her feelings as such, but this is a really roundabout way for her to get there.

>After everything she had put them through—the ridicule, the relentless drive, and then the fall; in the end it was Aria and Sonata who were there to lift her up.//

Misused semicolon.

>Adagio heard their voices in the room rise and approach the door.//

Just say what the voices did. Again, it's implied Adagio hears whatever the narrator says. The "rise" part sounds weird, though. There's not much of a change in height for them to stand, so it's odd that she'd notice anything different about that. Besides, it would tend to connote the voices getting louder when it's used for something auditory, but that's not what you mean.

>their song took on a new emotion—a gentle embrace of sympathy and compassion//

How can she tell? What's her evidence?

>she found Aria kneeling to her left and Sonata sitting to her right//

The "she found" makes this seem unexpected, but you already made a big deal about her hearing them come toward the door, so she knew they were approaching... then forgot?

>They put their heads down on her shoulders and the three of them sang.//

Needs a comma.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1279

>>1278
>Raising an arm, she lifted a cascade of hair from her face and released it over her shoulder, following through into a long, languid stretch. She sighed contentedly, closing her eyes for a moment and allowing the smell of fresh-brewed coffee to paint its mural on her senses.//
That's four participial phrases in only two sentences.

>One of the other doors in the hallway was slightly ajar and Adagio peeked in.//

>They both sat back again and Aria took another long sip.//
>She leaned her shoulder against Aria’s and the two shared a smile.//
>She took a deep breath and her eyes began to glisten with moisture as she exhaled.//
Needs a comma.

And back to the subject of repeated words, you're once again using "look" a lot in this chapter. "Smile," too.

>as if some unrequested memory was playing out inside her coffee mug//

It's a hypothetical statement, so use subjunctive mood: "as if... were playing out..."

>Adagio became more confident now that her suspicions were correct,//

So have the narrator reflect a thought on the subject instead of abstractly informing me of it as a factual matter. This is the same issue I've noted a couple times before about it being implied that what's true of the narrator is true of Adagio.

>forcibly steadying her breathing so as to not cry//

As stated, narrator-as-Adagio is reading Aria's mind. Let me see what evidence brings Adagio to this conclusion so it's grounded in her perception and not amounting to a perspective shift.

>place now.” Sonata then smiled softly, looked over to Adagio, and placed//

I know they're meant in different senses, but you still want to avoid word repetition like this.

>‘Dagie//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. But as a nickname, you don't really need one anyway.

>At the same time, Aria made her way quickly down the hall and into the bathroom, a single sob wracking her form as she clutched her arms.//

And Adagio doesn't react to this at all? It makes her seem awfully emotionless.

>With a confused expression//

Let me see it, too. Then I can make my own judgment.

>Sunset’s shoulders tensed and she fiddled with her jacket cuffs//

Needs a comma in the middle there.

>Sonata puzzled//

Here, I'll just say that you should read the section on saidisms at the top of this thread. It struck me that I'm seeing a lot of fairly exotic speaking verbs from you, so I did a search on "said," and I see that you only used it seven times in this chapter.

>I’d never seen you like that, and looking back now, I can’t believe I wasn’t more worried about you.//

And yet her narration makes her seem very unaffected by it. If there's one point I can't press enough through the whole story so far: let the narration carry the mood. It needs to reflect her emotions through how it conveys the information, not just what it says.

>Sonata gave no response as she sat motionless staring at the air in front of her.//

>Adagio and Sunset sat in silence listening.//
Most times, you'll want to set off a participial phrase with a comma. Same for a simple participle that doesn't immediately precede what it modifies.

>placing both hands on her glass of juice//

You're really fixated on what they do with their hands, for some reason. Go for some more variety in their body language.

>After their outpouring, the conversation turned again to lighthearted matters.//

It feels odd that you've spent so much of this conversation saying what transformations the sirens went through, but then it's like you forgot Sunset was there. They waited for her, and she's the one who originated all this, and then we never see her reaction.

>The others agreed unanimously and Adagio heard them return to conversation as she started down the hallway.//

Needs a comma.

>Turning the shower knobs to the right, Adagio relished in a deep, long breath as steam hung in the warm wet air.//

Watch that synchronization again. This says all this stuff happens at the same time, but while she's turning the knobs, there's already steam? And "warm, wet" are coordinate adjectives.

>wrapped up in one towel. She stepped out and quickly wrapped//

Watch that repetition.

>Her attention was drawn to the right end of the hanger rod where—buried deep in the alcove behind the sliding door—her collection of nicer clothes had been unceremoniously shoved aside.//

Here's another problem with the perspective. I'll keep harping on this, but the limited narrator is essentially Adagio herself. So when something grabs her attention, where's her mind going to be? Describing how her attention travels there, or immediately jumping to whatever it is? You have to follow a natural thought process, or it loses its authenticity.

>one-by-one//

You don't need to hyphenate that.

>second only to her collection of rare exquisite wines//

Set this off with a comma. And you have coordinate adjectives again in "rare, exquisite" that need a comma.

>began lifting arms//

Seems like you're missing a word. And I don't know why she'd be doing this anyway.

>in the mirror//

I'd recommend cutting this. It's obvious.

>From this vantage point in her memory, she became aware of a pattern across all of the adoring yet vacant expressions. All were devoid of feeling and lacked any trace of genuine respect.//

And her description of this is so dull that it still feels like they're devoid of feeling.

>Spellbound and forced; none of these faces would matter to her once they faded from view.//

Misused semicolon.

>band finale//

Odd way to describe it. It did have an official title.

>in a harsh, almost painful way//

So make this whole paragraph sound like she's in pain.

>as the crowd turned away from her toward the band on the hill, their faces brightening as they shifted from bewilderment to genuine joyous respect//

Besides just the sheer number of "as" clauses in the story, it's really clunky to have two in the same sentence.

>her eyes filled with a loving concern mixed with heartfelt, genuine adoration//

This is an emotional high point of the story. Now's not the time to spoon-feed emotions to the reader. Give him the evidence and let him draw the conclusion. You need him to connect with the character, and the way to do that is to make him put himself in Adagio's place by interpreting these types of cues. In case I haven't covered it all, there's a brief discussion in the section on show versus tell at the top of this thread.

>Adagio could now admit to herself that she might have a lot to learn, and was no longer too proud to seek out the wisdom of experience.//

This is awfully expository. Let her actions speak for her. Or at least be more subtle.

>As her own reflection came back into focus, Adagio squinted as she discovered a curiosity which warranted further inspection.//

Two "as" clauses in a single sentence again.

>by the half a year’s passage//

You don't need that "the."

>looks of awe//

Describe them.

>‘Course//

You don't need the apostrophe, since you're not eliminating letters from a word.

>Her eyes went unfocused and she added,//

Needs a comma.

>looked down again//

Repetitive with the "looked forward again" in the last paragraph.

>appearing to share her confusion//

How so?

>Her voice trailed off.//

I know. I can see the ellipsis.

>apprehension appeared to get the better of her//

What does Adagio see to make her think this?

>An understanding of where Sunset was going with this took hold for Adagio.//

And she doesn't react to that in any way? This is very factual.

>well, discord//

She used this exact phrasing the last time she spoke.

>Adagio looked down again//

You're using "look" an awful lot around here. In fact, there are quite a lot throughout the chapter, and they tend to get clustered.

>so to speak//

Adagio just used that phrase a few paragraphs back.

>I guess I’m just not up that stuff.//

Seems like you're missing a word.

>second-nature//

No need to hyphenate that.

>Apprehension dawned on Adagio.//

Too blunt, and you go on to make her sound apprehensive anyway. Just cut this.

>Another minute brought them to the door of the local coffeehouse and Sunset opened it for Adagio to step through.//

Needs a comma.

>with a look of acute understanding//

And what does such a thing look like? See, the reason being blunt like this doesn't engage the reader is that it already gives them the info they need, but it hasn't made them think about it or visualize it. I can just accept the information and move on. Few readers are actually going to try and picture her expression from this description, so now they feel like less of a witness to the action. If you say what this looks like, you're painting a picture.

>as it motioned upward//

That's a really awkward phrasing.

>Shall we//

So... Sunset didn't buy any drinks? It's possible the drink that almost got spilled was Adagio's, but Sunset never came out to give it to her, so it's more likely the attacker's. But then Sunset comes out without any coffee, and they leave. Do they have it? If not, wouldn't one of them say something about deciding not to get any in light of the incident?

>The two walked side by side for a time, sharing an occasional smile and enjoying the warmth of their coffee.//

So they did get coffee. That wasn't evident in the last chapter. I suspect this is a victim of splitting the chapter, as your note says, so I'd recommend making this clearer in the previous chapter so the reader doesn't wonder about it until getting to this one.

>Adagio looked down her cup//

Missing word.

>quite the iron grip over your little empire there on campus. Quite//

Watch that repetition.

>loses their eyesight... forces you to look//

Probably not the best way to phrase that.

>Holding the cup between both hands//

Exactly the action Adagio took just a bit ago in the second paragraph.

>She placed both hands on her cup again//

These girls are obsessed with having both hands on their coffee cups.

>Even with all that control, I still felt so hollow. It hurt.//

And she's just holding her hands on her cup while saying all this. If it was really that emotional a journey wouldn't she be a bit more lively about discussing it? What else might she do while she talks to add emphasis here? What kind of body language or facial expressions?

>She glanced down at her coffee//

There's also a lot of looking at coffee. The narrative actions are pretty lacking in this conversation. The nonverbal parts of it should say as much as the words do.

>Adagio pitched her empty cup in//

But she's not done much except hold the cup and look down at it. When did she drink it?

>Sunset walking with her eyes closed//

And at times, Adagio had hers closed, too. Are they just blindly strolling along and miraculously avoiding running into anything?

>Taking another slow breath, she went on in more somber tone.//

Watch your synchronization. The use of a participle implies these two actions happen at the same time, but she would more likely do these in sequence. People generally don't talk while breathing in, and it wouldn't sound somber.

>looked down again//

Try for some other ways to phrase this. You're saying it a lot.

>Sunset spun around, her eyes flitting back and forth between Adagio, the ground, and her own hands—as if trying to process the statement but failing.//

The way this is phrased, it's coming from Sunset's perspective, but Adagio's been your perspective character. The narrator's getting a bit flustered, which only matches Sunset here, and he speaks to Sunset's thought process, which Adagio wouldn't know.

>Sunset… I//

There's an extra space in here.

>Sitting Adagio down next to her//

You're using quite a few participles through this section, and a number of them suffer from that same synchronization issue.

>Adagio lowered her eyes//

She just did this a few paragraphs ago, and I've been given no reason to think they aren't still lowered from then.

>has meant//

Verb tense, probably just a typo.

>a large measure of her worry flowing out with the breath//

And what does this feel like? It's a big moment, but she's very dry about it.

>looked down at the ground//

Wow, there's a lot of looking down in this chapter. It gets really repetitive.

>That was the key word here, wasn’t it.//

That's a question, right?

>She felt another wave of emotion begin to swell//

So vague and factual...

>Fuck it//

One f-bomb isn't going to kill the story, so it's not that I'm worried about breaking our content guidelines. But she's never spoken like this before, so it's pretty jolting to have her start now, 95% of the way through the story. It makes her characterization inconsistent.

>I’m sure the others would love to see you now, and hear how you’re doing.//

No need for that comma.

>Adagio looked down//

stahp

>And as they walked, they simply enjoyed each other’s company for a bit longer as their conversation turned to lighter matters.//

That's awfully clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, and they can cause the same synchronization problems that participles do.

>She then looked down//

Aria's caught this disease now, too? It's spreading!

>You really are a good person Adagio//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>this time on a truly empty room//

I don't get the significance of this. Is it because she'd always stayed behind, so her presence there meant it wasn't empty? But then that means she used to think it was empty even with her in it, and now she knows she really isn't, though she's described her old self as such, so... This is really confusing. I don't think there's a clear message here.

So. The biggest abstract issue is how the narration is at times too bland for its own good when the perspective character, i.e., Adagio, is anything but. And when you do present emotional information, it's often just told to me directly. I already referred you to the discussion on it, but I'll say something a little different here.

If you say Adagio is happy, I know that and move on. If you say she's smiling and bouncing up on her tiptoes, I see that picture and deduce from it that she's happy. Both give me the same information, but the latter makes me think about it and visualize it. You'll much more easily connect with a reader that way. That doesn't mean you can't be blunt at times. There are circumstances where that works. Unimportant moments for minor characters, fleeting instances... basically, where you don't really need the reader to feel the same thing along with the character. But when the character is having a big emotional moment, especially when it's pertinent to the story arc, you want the reader making that connection. Another time you can get away with being blunt is if you're writing in a fairy tale or children's story style, since that's traditionally how they're written, since kids just don't put that much thought into what they read.

The biggest mechanical issue is the sheer amount of repetition, for individual words, phrases, and sentence structures.

Fortunately, these aren't particularly difficult problems to fix, since they don't require reimagining your characters or plot. It's just a matter of tuning up the writing, and I think you can do it. I enjoyed the story, and I think that with a little more work, it could really shine. I'd like to see it come back in good shape so I can post it on the blog.

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1280

>>1278
>>1279
Thanks again for these. I believe you're the one who also reviewed this story's sequel many months ago. Per your feedback, while that sequel could (almost) stand on its own, I opted to start on EQD with this one instead for the sake of Adagio's characterization.

I had been a bit worried about whether it was proper use of the narration to dip into the things you're recommending here. So hearing now that it can work 'properly' that way, I expect I can tune this up nicely.

The repetitive body language has also been on my mind lately.

And thanks for getting to this as quickly as you did. I expect to have a good bit of time this weekend after all the family activities to dig into it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1282

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Derpy’s head buzzed with anxiety and frustration as she flew over Ponyville.//

That's a pretty weak hook. For one thing, this is a very typical action, so it doesn't set your story apart. For another thing, the telly emotional cue doesn't do anything to create a visual image, so I'm already disconnected from the character.

>The package in question//

You use this exact phrase twice in close proximity. Then later in this paragraph, you wander into present tense twice.

>As the sun emitted the first tints of evening light//

I don't understand. The sunset is usually characterized by the last light. What would even constitute the first evening light?

>newly-built//

When the first word is an -ly adverb, you don't need the hyphen.

>A few gentle flaps combined with her flight’s momentum allowed her to touch down by the mailbox//

I don't understand this, either. What about these flaps and momentum were necessary? It makes it sound like she undershot the landing and had to gain some last-second speed to get the rest of the way there, but it's not at all obvious that's what happened, and I suspect you didn't mean it that way. There's also a close repetition of "flap" here.

>and entering a quick trot//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>breath, breathing//

Repetitive.

>Derpy felt both relieved and a bit disheartened//

So let me see it. You're not going to get me to identify with the character by feeding me all the conclusions I should be making about her.

>what better housewarming gift then a long-awaited package//

Than/then confusion.

>specifically over her trip to the cabin//

Your previous sentence had pretty much the same phrasing, and it's not clear that you're doing this to create an effect through the repetition.

>the yellow pegasus with a turquoise//

A turquoise what? Or is she just holding a stone of it?

>in hopes of uncovering some little scandal//

This requires skipping into her perspective to identify her motive like this, though you'd been in Derpy's perspective the whole time so far.

>in comical dismay//

This type of prepositional phrase, where you bluntly state an emotion or attitude, is rarely necessary, but even more, you should never tell the reader what's funny.

>Colgate shrugged//

Indentation is off here.

>Derpy added, oblivious to whatever her friends were engaged in. In the face of such indifference, Raindrops gave a huff.//

Now you have two different characters' perspectives in a single paragraph.

>Cakes residence//

It'd either be "Cake residence" or "Cakes' residence."

>Phillydelphia//

Fillydelphia

>“No... No... Help... Someone!”//

Your indentation is really inconsistent around here.

>Pressing herself against the doors with eyes shut//

This is the third straight sentence you've started with a participle.

>As the ceiling began sinking and the reptilian skeleton approached her—indifferent to the chaos around it—Derpy grabbed the door handle and practically tore it open as she zipped out from the castle foyer.//

That's rather clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence.

>forgetting or simply ignoring the massive implications that had been laid out before her//

And since you'd taken a limited perspective for much of the story, it's now odd for the narrator to know things Derpy doesn't.

>swathe//

This is the verb form. You want the noun.

>A MEANS THAT WAS NOWHERE AS PROLIFICALLY USED IN THE DAYS OF MY CREATION THEN THEY ARE IN YOURS//

More than/then confusion.

>YOU ARE SIMPLY BEING ERASED//

Why isn't she turning that argument back on him? It's exactly the same situation. He could erase himself.

>…//

You had him end speech with an ellipsis once before, and I had a hard time buying that. This is even worse. This communicates an emotion, yet he's purely logical. He'd have to mean something that he intended her to pick up on by deliberately typing three dots on the screen. Why would he do that? It'd be enough to say he took a while to answer, as it's less the pause itself and more what happens during it that's important. Video games get away with putting this as dialogue, but good writing doesn't.

>before coming to a landing before//

Watch that repetition.

>lil’//

li’l

Indentations are all over the place in this chapter. Through a lot of the whole story, it seems. And there are a couple more lapses into present tense.

>Derpy elaborated//

What about her quote elaborates on anything?

>Ponyville??//

One question mark is plenty.

>not bothering to hide her elation//

You also occasionally do this: over-explain a character's motivation. Give the reader the evidence and the room to figure this out on his own. Motivations fall in the same category as emotions in that regard.

>“Great!” she beamed.//

How does one beam a sentence?

>Derpy plopped down on her romp//

Typo.

>song birds//

songbirds

>For a Cutie Mark Colgate saw a square patchwork of white and black squares.//

Cutie mark wouldn't be capitalized, and why are you jumping into Colgate's perspective here? At least you stay there, but the whole story has been in Derpy's until now, except for a few small lapses. So the reader is going to assume that continues until he sees otherwise. You should make it evident right at the beginning of the scene that Colgate will hold the perspective so that doesn't get confusing.

>as she came up with a response//

Now this would seem to be back in Derpy's head, as Colgate wouldn't know Derpy was inventing something here, unless you explain how she figures it out or reads Derpy's behavior to do so.

>either!" She frantically clarified//

Capitalization. And you're using an awful lot of exotic speaking verbs. Three's a section at the top of this thread on saidisms, which will explain.

>look, looking to each other with those looks, then looking//

Repetitive. I mean, that's overkill to the point I almost think it's intentional, but then you don't do anything with it. You're not trying to be humorous here, and it doesn't emphasize anything thematic, so I can't find a reason for it.

>"Indeed," was the curt reply.//

You're using this kind of speaking attribution enough that it's sticking out to me.

>Derpy gave a start when she saw that part of Colgate’s blue mane had relocated to the bottom of Raindrop’s chin, and that part of Raindrop’s tail was sticking out of Colgate’s back.//

And you're definitely in Derpy's viewpoint here. Your perspective wavers quite a bit.

>buggers//

Odd word choice for the narrative voice so far. You sure you didn't mean "bugs"?

>anti-gav//

anti-grav, yes?

The narrative voice is bizarre in this chapter. It's not objective, but there's no identifiable perspective character.

>Pokéballs//

I actually had to check this out on another story once. By show canon, that's two words.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>righted himself up//

You don't need the "up."

>with a very smug attitude//

What about him makes him seem smug?

>beneath a head//

His eyes are beneath his head? Are you sure you don't mean something close to "pate"?

>Huh??//

One will do.

>M-M-Marriage//

Only capitalize the first one.

>mascot."//

For some reason, you switch from fancy style quotation marks to simple ones here. Be consistent.

>Missingno!//

Haven't you been putting a period after his name?

>As Missingno. laid//

Lay/lie confusion.

>blocky head and body, perpetually smiling face, blue clothes, red cape, and a blocky handgun, who had leapt in front of the stricken Missingno., blocking//

Three variations on "block" in the same sentence.

>bout//

Needs an apostrophe.

>Handgrenades//

That's two words.

>buttplugs//

That's over the line for our blog.

>there laid Missingno//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>Several brackish tentacles//

I assume you meant "blackish."

>N-No//

Only capitalize the first.

You had a good premise going at first. It was kind of a mashup of "pony becomes aware of her fictional status" with horror tales of body hijacking. And that lasted through the first three chapters. Aside from the detailed issues, so far, so good.

Then we get tone whiplash. It's viable to have a tone change within a story, but it has to be executed smoothly, and this just jumps headfirst into randomness and meme/pop-culture references. Such things do not age well and are rarely funny past the first read-through. Plus the silly nature of it undermined any point the first part might have been making. It's not working as a bait-and-switch, which feels more like a trollfic than anything, and those have to be really good for us to feature one. I wouldn't be surprised if many readers felt cheated that they invested in the first three chapters, only to have it go nowhere.

That last part is really the heart of the matter here, since trollfics can be a matter of taste. Even in comedy, stories can make a point, and this one forgoes that in order to make references and strange rants that don't bring it to a conclusion.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1283

>>1280
Yes, it's entirely appropriate for narration to take on a personal voice, depending on the form your narrator takes.

There are multiple kinds, but the most common ones are these:

First-person — the narrator is the focus character and can speak her own thoughts in the narration, so the narrator should sound like her, in tone personality, and vocabulary.

Third-person limited or subjective — this is barely different from first person, except the choice of pronouns, and it's tougher to make a convincing sell of addressing the reader. But it'll sound like the focus character just the same, and it'll do conversational things like get interrupted, ask questions, trail off, and express opinions. He can also know and perceive only that which the focus character does.

Third-person omniscient or objective — There are exceptions for when the narrator is actually a character, but typically one who has no stake in the action and just observes it. But most commonly, this narrator has no personality and must stick to facts, but he can have access to any character's thoughts and knowledge. He just has to be careful to attribute those things to the character and not seem to claim them as his own. He doesn't have a personality or take a conversational tone.

Those are also in order of how easy it is to change which character the story focuses on at any given point. An omniscient narrator can jump around at will, at least within reason so it won't be confusing. A limited narrator or a first-person narrator shouldn't change perspective abruptly or too often, most commonly at scene breaks, though it can be done in the middle of a scene. I won't get too in depth on that unless you want to hear more, since it's not a problem you're having.

So the short answer is: yes, you can absolutely do these kinds of things with the narrator, as long as you understand why the best practices regarding them work and you're consistent about writing it.

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1284

>>1283
Right on. Thanks again. I'm about 3/4 through your comments now. And I'd love for you to be the reviewer continuing with this after I finish, since you've provided such helpful commentary toward improving it.

Could I just reply to your email with a Google doc link? It'd be more convenient that way to give direct responses to some of your points. Also more convenient, I'd imagine, for you to review the changes.

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1289

>>1278
>>1279

I did end up finishing over the weekend. Addressed your comments. And I must say, in the cases where you urged me to expand on the factual narration by shifting to the 'dagi-as-narrator' emotional processing... I honestly have gotten a bit choked up re-reading some the new passages, heh.

In the event that you'd prefer just following up here instead of in a google doc, I've included my own feedback on a couple of your points.

>//After their outpouring, the conversation turned again to lighthearted matters.//

>It feels odd that you've spent so much of this conversation saying what transformations the sirens went through, but then it's like you forgot Sunset was there. They waited for her, and she's the one who originated all this, and then we never see her reaction.

Regarding Sunset's passivity here. It sort of /was/ my intent to write her this way. Her active role comes in the next two chapters. She's being intentionally silent and just observing at this point, adding a few helpful insights where she feels it'd be helpful to Adagio.

And with her lack of visible reaction to Aria and Sonata's story, recall it's been implied that she's already been there for their healing process, which occurred prior to the events of this story. So none of what they're saying is 'new' to her.

If this second part wasn't clear in the story's context, I could try to make it moreso... But not really sure how to manage that without breaking the overall flow of the story. I did add a sentence to this paragraph to bring her more into the picture, but it's a bit on the expository side. Again, her focus really comes into play in the following chapters.

>//band finale//

>Odd way to describe it. It did have an official title.

This is one of those cases, I feel, where I did actually get it right with the limited narration. When she's thinking back to the event in her mind, I wouldn't picture her using its full official title. So considering this, I purposefully avoided calling it that.

>//a large measure of her worry flowing out with the breath//

>And what does this feel like? It's a big moment, but she's very dry about it.

When I wrote this, I was thinking I covered the feeling in the prior paragraph. This was just a bit of followup, and I felt adding more here would break the flow. But I did now alter the phrasing of this sentence slightly. And I believe it helped a bit.

-------------
Thanks again. Let me know how you'd prefer to go forward from here. Would like to stick with your as the reviewer through the next steps as well, given how insightful your feedback has been so far.

cosCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1292

>>1282
Well, those chapters are supposed to be alternate endings, so the last one could've been wholly optional for the reader. But if removing it is what it takes to make it through, I can do so. Also all the assorted corrections and what not. Thanks for the lengthy review, anyway.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1300

>>1289
Sorry for the late reply.

Re: Sunset seeming to have no reaction to the conversation between the other sirens.

Sunset may have seen a similar situation with Aria and Sonata, but inasmuch as everyone's a little different, Sunset might react to Adagio, at least for the parts where she differs. But more of what I was getting at is that this is told from Adagio's perspective. She doesn't know that about Sunset. It's more that she's presumably sitting there, where Adagio can see her, yet Adagio drops her from the scene altogether. Even if it's just her smiling and nodding or something, don't forget she's there. When you have a huge crowd present, then it does start to become ridiculous to check in with every single character, but you don't have many here, so just remind the reader she's there.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1301

>>1292
Those were alternate endings? It sure didn't read that way. It felt like a single, continuous story, as the final chapter is the only one that really came to a conclusion. The one thing it does is give the story some closure. Without it, I don;t think the story would feel like it actually ended.

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1302

>>1300
I see what you're getting at, and could add a bit of that in, sure.

Though is this something you'd need to see before going ahead with reviewing the re-submission I made a few days ago? Asking since we're kind of "crossing in the mail" here.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1306

>>1302
I haven't started on it yet, so any changes you make now aren't going to make me re-read anything.

SkyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1311

>>1306
Made a change to address this. Beyond what I'd already modified, all it really needed was expanding on some of Adagio's thoughts in the second half of that scene, I feel.

So consider it ready for you at this point.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1325

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>highschool//

That's two words. You do this several times.

>party goers//

And that's one word.

>Aria mumbled under breath//

Missing word.

>Come on girls, we’ve got work to do.//

When direct address is in the middle of a sentence like this, it takes commas on both sides.

>friday//

Capitalize. You make the same mistake later.

>solo//

That's a brand name, so it'd be capitalized, or maybe better not to use it.

>The humans were beginning to take notice them//

You either need to add a word or take one of those away.

>like-//

Please use proper dashes for asides and cutoffs. I'm not going to make any more of these, so just do a sweep for them.

>She paused, mid-rant, as a car passed the house and she caught a flash of distinctive red and yellow hair as it drove by.//

It's kind of clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, and the "it" is located so far from the "car" it references that it makes it sound like you're saying the hair drove by.

At this point, I'll also say that your "carpet matches the drapes" comment being said about underage characters and the same underage characters supplying wine coolers at their party is going to be problematic for our content guidelines.

>Sunset Shimmer—former queen of Canterlot High—was driving and Adagio watched her turn off the street at the next intersection.//

Cases like this where you have two separate subjects that each perform their own verb usually have a comma between the clauses: "Sunset Shimmer... was driving, and Adagio watched..."

>Adagio thought she could reach the top//

You're doing this a lot lately. There's a concept sometimes called narrative filtering that goes with using a limited narrator. Now, your narrator is barely limited. It's staying quite formal, but it does take a slightly conversational style at times, like the aside a little before this. And it's stuck to things only Adagio could know so far. So it's implicit that Adagio and the narrator have the same thoughts and perceptions. You don't have to say what Adagio thought, knew, wondered, wished, heard, saw, etc., because if the narrator says it, it's already understood that the same is true of Adagio. So if you just said something like "she might reach the top" here, it's implied that she thought it. By forcing that in there where it isn't needed, you're placing an unnecessary degree of separation between the reader and the character.

>opposite of//

You don't need the "of."

>Horses...huh?//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts the sentence. Do a sweep for these.

>Some sort of utility vehicle?//

With regard to my earlier comment, why italicize this? Just by virtue of the limited narrator saying it, it automatically becomes Adagio's thought.

>made up a few simple buildings made of//

Watch for repetitive phrasings or word usage like this.

>The path lead//

The past tense of "lead" is "led." You do this multiple times.

>There didn’t seem to be anyone else around and Adagio felt exposed on the path with no cover.//

Just pointing out another example for good measure of a spot that needs a comma between the clauses. There are a lot of these.

>foal’s play//

I'm not sure I buy her using this expression. She wasn't a pony. Would a siren even refer to its young as a foal? I don't know.

>she seemed to sob//

She already said she heard Sunset sob. Why is she backing off to "seem" now?

>the outside if the stall//

Typo.

>you’d never had made the cut//

Typo.

At this point, I'm really confused as to how this is supposed to fit into canon. In the movie, Sunset had never met the sirens before she showed them around the school. Adagio knew even before that there was Equestrian magic around, but she wouldn't know from where yet. By you have this as later that same day, but by lunch, Sunset already knew they were a threat. That's what prompted her to write to Celestia, yet she doesn't react to them at all this way, and having an encounter with Adagio sure seems like the kind of thing she'd mention to the other 5 girls. I can see fudging that bit, but not so much that Sunset has no misgivings about Adagio, because she should know better by now. And then you don't have things vague during this encounter. Adagio explicitly lets on that she knows about Equestria. That may be pushing it a bit far. And then you have Sunset fill Adagio in on what happened in the first movie, but in Rainbow Rocks, Sunset was surprised that Adagio knew. You might need to put an AU tag on this, since you're altering some pretty fundamental parts of the plot progression.

>would she had made it//

Same typo as before. I hope this isn't going to be a recurring problem.

>I’ve talked with it//

about, not with

>ok//

Please write that out as "okay." This happens a lot, especially in chapter 2.

>“Um,” Sunset wiped her hands off on the apron she wore and glanced around. “are your friends here?”//

You have the narration punctuated/capitalized like it's a speaking attribution, but it contains no speaking verb. Either give it one or make it a separate sentence or aside.

>But just because I’ve dropped the villain routine, doesn’t mean I’ve gone soft.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Adagio grit her teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>face Sunset, her stance wide and low. Sunset Shimmer faced her with her hands hanging at her side and stance//

More close repetition of both "face" and "stance."

>phosphorescent//

How are they phosphorescent? You sure you don't mean fluorescent?

>Threaten that, Adagio Dazzle//

Another spot where the direct address needs two commas. Please sweep for these.

>First me, then Twilight//

Wait, this is a completely different matter. She knew Twilight was a pony, because Sunset drew her there. That wouldn't be a surprise. It doesn't really fit the pattern.

>rough housing//

roughhousing

>I got this dinky little hatchback, I might as well put it to use.//

Comma splice. And if it's a hatchback, why did Adagio guess it was an SUV in the last chapter? She's been in the human world longer than Sunset. She should know this stuff.

>the middle set//

Typo.

>‘cuz//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You'll need to scan for these and paste in ones turned the right way.

>o’ us//

That's a really awkward elision, since it requires a glottal stop. You wouldn't hear someone say it like this.

>she kept blushing and clamming up whenever Vice Principal Luna’s princess counterpart was mentioned//

Yeah, you're taking liberties here. More evidence that an AU tag might be required.

>monday//

I don't know why you consistently won't capitalize the names of days. I'm not going to mark any more.

>Starswirl//

Per canon, Star Swirl.

>Now that the gems are gone//

Wait, this takes place after Rainbow Rocks? Then Adagio definitely would have known all about Sunset. She explicitly says so in the movie. Yet at the horse park, she only then discovered Sunset was from Equestria. Is there a time skip here? I don't see any evidence of one.

>rugmunchers//

You're kind of playing both sides of it. Sunset told Rarity that this was much more common and tolerated in Equestria, yet the sirens sure don't seem that way. And please, please, please don't tell me that the basis for the romance is going to be that these two find solace in each other being the only ones who feel this way.

>what with you being such a huge dyke//

Okay, you're really going over the top here. Subtlety is the writer's friend.

>Oh, she already left.//

Adagio's been your viewpoint character. If she's not there, how can the limited narrator know what happened?

>just as had been a week ago//

>last she had come to the horse park//
Missing word.

>less people//

"Less" goes with collective quantities, like money. You want "fewer."

>that has sat//

Inconsistent verb tense, but probably just a typo.

>pitch fork//

pitchfork. There are other instances.

>she was reasonable sure//

Typo.

>riding tact//

tack

>watched you care of the horses//

Missing word.

>“I dunno, Dash,” Sunset pursed her lips and turned out of the neighborhood toward Fluttershy’s home, “something was definitely off about her.//

Another spot where you have a non-speaking action punctuated as if it's an attribution.

>Adagio didn’t seem to want to see the other Dazzlings and she had a fresh bruise on the side of her face.//

Needs a comma.

>not a lesbian orgy//

Two things about this. First, as I've said before, this is really over the top. It's like you're beating the reader over the head with a hammer to make your point. Second, it's something I usually refer to as "piling on." Most often, this happens with tragic circumstances in a story, where a character is not only an orphan, but her brother just suffered a horrific injury, her dog has cancer, and she lost her job. At some point, it just becomes ridiculous. Less is more. For adverse circumstances, you generally want to go with the minimum necessary for the plot to work. This keeps things more realistic and relatable. Past that tipping point, adding more makes the story less powerful. So when you have such blatant and cliched adversity both girls are facing over their sexuality, it feels more formulaic and less authentic.

>with center piece//

Missing word.

>The girls took turns filling her in of Sunset’s encounter with Adagio//

I've only seen that phrased as "on," not "of."

>besides the huge converted farm house//

"Besides" means "in addition to" or "despite." You want "beside."

>Is that Gummy, on your head//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Hide & Seek//

Don't use an ampersand, except where you're quoting something written, like a sign.

>pet alligator//

In the movies, wasn't Gummy just a stuffed animal?

>When she did//

Set off this dependent clause with a comma.

This Slumber Party Confessions Game is just ridiculously cliched. I already thought you had problems with Adagio and Sunset's relationship. When their only reason to be together is because they're both being bullied and that they're essentially each other's only option, since there are no other lesbians out there, it sure doesn't speak toward a viable basis for a relationship or a healthy interaction. But things like this party game are so contrived that it's just pushing the story toward this confrontation for plot convenience rather than any sort of natural progression of events. You don't want the plot to feel like you're forcing it into a mold because you need it to go a certain direction. It needs to feel like events happen in a natural fashion, but these characters are more acting in service of how you want the plot to go instead of like they're actually responding to events that life throws at them.

>The chorus of groans around the room drowned out Sunset’s quiet gasp and she took an unsteady step backwards.//

Needs a comma.

>‘Truth or Dare Except There isn’t a Dare Part?’//

Unless the question mark is part of the game's title, it would go outside the quotation marks.

>pale skinned//

>wide eyed//
This type of phrasing needs a hyphen. In fact, I've glossed over a lot of them in previous chapters that you really ought to fix—things like "pink-haired."

>principles//

Typo.

>Starswirl//

Star Swirl.

>leather bound//

Given that this book actually comes from Equestria, isn't it weird to have it bound with the tanned hide of a dead sentient cow?

>Adagio Dazzling//

Dazzle

>She set the crate on the ground, and looked back up at the blue siren.//

>Adagio sighed, and slumped against the trailer’s pitted vinyl siding.//
>Sonata nodded sadly, and looked over her shoulder toward the front of the trailer where Aria was in the living area.//
No need for those commas.

>maked//

Typo.

>binded//

bound

>Sirens, ‘covens’//

No need for a comma there.

>Sunset chewed her lip thoughtfully.//

She just did this near the beginning of the scene.

>The park was almost empty//

Needs a comma after this.

>The horses were being quiet and a few of them seemed to be sleeping.//

>She looked over at the administration building but she still didn’t quite feel like signing in.//
Needs a comma.

>This dumb//

Missing word.

>one off//

Hyphenate.

>The horse didn’t say anything, instead he playfully nipped at her jacket sleeve.//

Comma splice.

>It felt extra wild after a couple of days without a proper shower//

Needs a comma after this.

>full length//

Hyphenate.

>The brush caught on a tangle in the first pass and she winced when she heard the hair break.//

Needs a comma. I hope I've pointed out enough of these that you get the picture about which ones of these need commas, which ones don't, and why. I'm not going to mark any more.

>Pissing her off would not be the smart thing to do to.//

Extraneous word.

>that blasted mage, Starswirl sends us here//

Either remove that comma or pair it with another one after the name.

>winched//

Typo.

>handy work//

handiwork

>Adagios mane//

Missing apostrophe.

>The sky was visibly starting to take on a yellowish tone//

As opposed to invisibly? Why even include that word?

There were some mechanical problems I had to point out repeatedly, so keep those in mind. On the more abstract side, there were also places where the emotional context was too blunt.

Plot-wise, there were a couple of little things that might run afoul of our content guidelines. I'm also unclear as to how this is supposed to fit into canon without significantly bending a few timelines, given that it isn't tagged as AU. Lastly, the relationship just isn't sold that convincingly. I can see their shared feelings of isolation as being an impetus for a friendship, but a romance? Their only basis for it has been "she's the only other lesbian I know of." That's certainly not grounds for a healthy relationship, and it's hard to believe either one would go for it on such flimsy footing.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you do a better job of developing that in future chapters, but so far, there's not an inkling of what would make a good match between these two. They're commiserating, not finding things they find endearing about each other. For Sunset's part, she also keeps flip-flopping on whether she considers Adagio sympathetic or a monster.

And part of that commiseration is that they've both been oppressed and stigmatized over their sexual orientation, and that's really played over the top, to where it's hyperbole and cliche. You don't want to make your characters into Sympathy Sues, where you're so transparently trying to get the reader to root for them. Along those lines, I talked about "piling on," and Adagio living in the woods is just more of that.

It's not a bad idea for a story, and the writing is otherwise pretty good, but it's hard to get into a relationship and a conflict that comes across as so forced. That's certainly possible to improve upon, but it take more rethinking of the story's progression that you're willing to make, and if that's the case, I understand.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1345

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Some adverb abuse. I hit a spot in the latter half of chapter one where it felt like you were tacking a lot of adverbs onto actions, particularly speaking actions. This is one of the most prevalent ways of telling versus showing, and while you can get away with some, it did get to feeling after a while that you weren't allowing the reader any space to figure out this stuff for himself.

There are a few ways that are accepted for formatting ellipses, but cramming them against words on both sides isn't one of them. Most common is to leave a space after one, except when it begins a sentence.

There's a rather ungainly time skip in chapter 1 where you just say a lot of time has passed. Why not place a scene break there? Or at least handle the transition a little more elegantly.

>kept a ledger of some sort to keep//

Watch the repetition.

A lot of the info on galleons seems irrelevant or at least breaks the omniscient voice. It doesn't seem very germane to what's happening at that moment, and doing this in a limited narration implies Rose is thinking all this, yet there's no reason why she would be.

compliment/complement confusion

Shipping out of nowhere. Wow, we're barely into the story, and Rose is already falling for Swashbuck? We're given absolutely no reason why she would. There's never been the barest mention of this developing, that she finds things endearing about him, that he might show any signs of reciprocating, and then it's suddenly there. And just as suddenly gone, so it was also of no consequence. I'll leave open the possibility that you revisit this in later chapters, but even if so, the onset of it has no justification.

whose/who's confusion

>called their plans, “Foolish.”//

Why is this a quote?

>their primary income coming from the creation of ship sails, though they dabbled in other practical cloth work, such as upholstery//

Already said this earlier in the chapter.

>I will show you father.//

Missed a comma and a capitalization there.

Chapter 2 switches to a more limited narration, which is odd for the uses of LUS. I'll discuss this at the end, because it's a persistent issue.

>Isingo, was it?//

She already said she hoped he was there, so she knows his name. Why is she waffling now?

I can't figure out Isingo's speech at all. He has no regular rhyme scheme, and at times doesn't even come close to rhyming. Are you actually trying to rhyme "sought" with "wants"? I know poetry isn't easy, but it's what you chose. You didn't have to pick a zebra character or make rhyming something that all zebras do. But you did, and now you have to do it right.

>I'll let father know//

When used in place of a name, it gets capitalized, i.e., "Father" versus "my father."

>Wh-What//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>conflicted by the tragic scene//

This is a very bland summary that does nothing to connect me to her. Demonstrate this.

>Glancing as a sloop passed her, the unicorn's horn glowed green//

Dangling participle. You want to say she glanced, but she doesn't appear here. This says her horn glanced.

>That ship has over a hundred guns//

Yet you're very inconsistent at how much damage it actually did. The first volley was only described as two shots. And why are they attacking the buildings first? Only the other ships can pursue, so why not sink them?

>the unicorns head//

Missing apostrophe.

>bowspirit//

bowsprit

>Her trips down to the docks as a filly involved a great deal of up-close investigating, including climbing the rigging when she could.//

As stated, this is irrelevant. I can see the point you're trying to make, but you never make it.

>she felt a cannon whiz by her//

Hopefully, the cannon is still on the ship.

>"Don't you touch that filly!" Roared the dwarf pony.//

You tend to mess up the capitalization of an attribution when the quote ends in anything but a comma. The end punctuation doesn't matter.

>she could feel blood trickle from her nose. Opening one eye, she could see//

The "she could feel/see" construction is repetitive here, and you're also making these intrusive perceptive comments a lot lately. If you're going with a limited narrator, it's implicit that whatever the narrator says, the focus character sees, hears, knows, wonders, etc. Inserting those kinds of words forces an extra distance from the reader. Even in an omniscient narration, where it's okay to use them more, you don;t want to go overboard on qualifying them with "could," since that implies it's something most would miss, so you're making it unusual. But when unusual things keep happening, they're not unusual anymore.

>a hateful look//

So let me see it, too.

>The chains prevented her from putting her hooves to the floor.//

Just the front ones or all four?

>the unicorns front legs//

Missing apostrophe.

>he only shook her head at her//

How did he manage that?

>Where is my father and mother?//

Number agreement.

>S-Stay//

Another stutter with too much capitalization.

>Now my town lays in ruins//

Lay/lie confusion.

>We will back//

Seems like there's a missing word.

>tipped over//

You're using the phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>tain't//

You're eliding a letter off the front, too, so add another apostrophe there.

>I wish...to check.//

That seems like awfully formal language given her situation and condition.

>the unicorn was carried//

I'll comment more on this at the end, but the passive voice here doesn't really suit the limited narration. It's happening to her, but the passive voice makes it feel very external to her.

>two flagon's overflowing with cider//

Why is that apostrophe there? For that matter, this description of the owner is fairly forced. She's in a very stressful situation, things are rushed. Indeed, we barely get a description of the journey there or the tavern, but then you give a full run-down on how this guy looks. It doesn't quite mesh, especially since she goes on to say she already knows him. Given your choice of a limited narrator, such a description implies the information is new to the perspective character, but it isn't, so it's not an reasonable portrayal of where her attention would be.

>Fergus or Isingo were//

With "or," the subject closest to the verb determines its number, so it would be "was."

>know of what I'm being accused of//

Redundant "of."

>The self-pity carried on for much of the day.//

I wonder if you wouldn't do better moving this to the next scene and making it a summary looking back from there. As is, you're staying in the moment, but you blast through it so quickly that nothing of note happens. My first instinct was to say this needs more detail, but if you want to gloss it over, it;s more easily done in retrospect.

>The unicorn maintained her glare for just a moment longer before it melted into one of regret.//

With your limited narrator, it's awfully self-aware of her to analyze her glare (and what does "one" refer to anyway?), which she can't see, and identify it as regret. More immediate to her would be the thoughts running through her head and the physical sensations they causem i.e., her emotions, not a dispassionate summary of them.

>Her voice trailed off.//

I can see the ellipsis. This is redundant.

Isingo's speech is getting painful. There are some really weak rhymes (besieged/seeds? Really?), and there's barely a rhythm to it.

>She was a yellow mare//

See, this description feels more natural, since Rose doesn't know her.

>She had been roused from her rest for this particular event, and was only just gathering what was happening.//

Yet the narrator doesn't sound anything less than clear and certain about what's happening. Maybe you intend this scene to be more omniscient, but if so, I don't see a purpose to it yet.

>it will not be pleasant//

She says this exact phrase twice.

>this sounded no more pleasant//

Then this sounds quite repetitive with it.

>tain't//

I'd make the same apostrophe comment as before, but this is short for "it ain't," which doesn't make sense here.

>She smiled, but it was stiff, like her features were still quite keen on maintaining their furious scowl.//

I have no idea who's supposed to hold the perspective here. It's not Rose's.

>anypony//

Given the present company, would she use this term?

First off. please note that I wasn't exhaustive. For instance, I marked two spots where the capitalization of a stutter was off, but there was at least one other in the story as well. I point out each type of problem I see but not necessarily every instance of each, so it's up to you to make a sweep through the story with those in mind.

Now, the perspective issue I wanted to discuss. There are many instances where you have the narrator express one of the characters' opinions for them. You do have quoted thoughts, but there are also places where the narrator speaks a character's thought or takes a conversational style, like asking a question or trailing off. That's fine, and you do keep that primarily to Rose's viewpoint. I can't recall seeing a place where you have the narrator say something from another point of view, though it's a common mistake to do so (at least it's a mistake when there's not a smooth transition between viewpoints or it jumps too frequently), so at least you were good with consistency. But then there were long stretches where the narrator rarely said anything except facts that would be apparent from any viewpoint. It goes back to feeling omniscient in those places, and if you let it go on too long, it makes the narrative voice feel inconsistent again, so I'd encourage you to look for passages like that and be sure to put little things in the narration that take such a conversational style or are obviously stated from Rose's viewpoint to keep reminding the reader of the viewpoint.

One more issue of that viewpoint is the number of times you use Lavender Unicorn-type descriptors for your characters. In particular, you refer to Rose as "the unicorn" quite a bit. Now, since the story is told from her limited perspective, the implication is that Rose sees, knows, thinks, etc. whatever the narrator says. So when the narrator calls her "the unicorn," it creates the feeling that she would refer to herself that way, which is just strange, unless you've established that the character thinks about themselves in the third person like Trixie, maybe.

Really, that consistency with the perspective is the only pervasive thing, and it might take a little time to deal with, or I might have just approved the story now and let you fix all the technical details while you were waiting for it to show up on the blog. As it is, I still won't have to do more than a spot-check, so when you're ready to resubmit, choose the "back from Mars" option.

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1348

>>1345

Thank you for this feedback! It's very helpful.

Just one thing: Swashbuck isn't the love interest of the story. Rose's immediate attraction to him is mostly physical. She just has this shallow crush on him. Isingo is actually the love interest, I wanted to let that take its time to develop. Though, the fact that you confused Swashbuck as the main love interest tells me I need to better illustrate his role in the story. So again, thank you!

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1366

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>turn a mortal enemies//

Extraneous word.

>To each their own , she supposed.//

Extraneous space.

>Again, her awareness of the outside world gave way as she became lost in thought.//

At this point, I'm noticing that you pretty much only changed things that were mechanical issues. I have to emphasize how painful this statement is. You've kept the reader in a close limited perspective with Cheerilee the whole story, and this absolutely does not fit with that.

>the Cutie Mark Crusaders pupils//

Missing an apostrophe.

>“Hold it steady,” said Big Mac, holding the hammer tight in his teeth. Cheerilee held//

Three uses of "hold" in only 15 words.

>She opened the closet//

This is the first of 5 sentences in a row that all start with "she."

>rush was a little more enthusiastic than usual today. The foals rushed//

>front of the room for a long time. The door in front//
>still lingered, with a few random flurries still//
>However, one set of hoofprints had taken this same path. As she rounded a bend in the path//
Watch that repetition.

>closing her eyes. She walked forward a few steps with her eyes closed//

Pretty redundant.

>Cheerilee picked up her pace to try and catch up to Apple Bloom, after all, walking with her would look much less suspicious than following along behind her.//

That first comma is a splice.

>I was coming out to Sweet Apple Acres so I thought I would walk there with you.//

Needs a comma.

>Apple Bloom seemed markedly apprehensive.//

And what evidence is she basing this conclusion on?

>trying to keep the conversation going//

This is the second straight paragraph of Cheerilee's actions in which you have her trying to do something. Besides getting repetitive, it's spelling out a character motive, which is just as bad as spelling out a character emotion. They're both more powerful when hinted at instead of stated outright.

>but I can’t complain”//

Missing end punctuation.

>“He’s probably still in the barn.” Our wagon’s been having problems and he’s been out there working on it for the last couple of days.”//

Extraneous quotes, and the second sentence needs a comma.

>Bye Miss Cheerilee!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Taking a deep breath, Cheerilee started forward once more, taking the path towards the outlying barn.//

It's repetitive enough to have participial phrases at both ends of the sentence, especially when they use the same verb.

>continued pressing on//

Redundant as a gerund, unless you want to make that a participle.

>shut her eyes, desperately trying to shut//

More repetition.

>The wagon stood in the center of the floor.//

Look at the sheer number of boring "to be" verbs in this paragraph. Same goes for two paragraphs later. That and the passive voice phrasing are grinding the story's momentum to a halt.

>howdy Cheerilee//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>“E’yup. Just gimme a sec,”//

There's lots of repetitive word choice and phrasing in this paragraph.

>eyes, which had left a notable impression around his eyes//

Repetition.

>I wanted to was ask you//

I can't tell if you meant that to be jumbled.

>Time to head back… No!//

Thus begins a string of thirteen consecutive sentences that end in an exclamation mark. Exclamation marks are for emphasis. They make things stand out, but when everything stands out, nothing does. And it just gets irritating to read.

>took a seat//

Repetitive phrasing with what he just said.

>took a seat//

And you keep using this phrase in subsequent paragraphs.

>She adjusted herself to where she was sitting on her tail, and once she was situated, she was surprised to see that Big Mac was finally making eye contact with her.//

Four instances of "was" in the same sentence.

>kept thinking//

Extraneous space.

Both of these characters are having really strong emotional reactions to really vague problems. They just keep talking about "what might have happened," and when you're so nebulous, it's going to be very hard to get a reader invested in the situation. It's hard to care when I don't really know what I'm caring about. They're using such generic and noncommittal language. We've at least spend enough time in Cheerilee's head to have an idea of what thoughts she has on the subject, but I honestly don't have a clue why Big Mac is crying.

>clamboring//

You seem to have combined "clamber" and "clamor."

>glad you’re feeling better Mac//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>With the departure of the class, she was left with little to keep her busy for the rest of the evening; little to keep her from dwelling on the previous day.//

There's no independent clause after the semicolon. You should be able to split a sentence at one, but the part after it couldn't stand on its own.

>Her hooves dragged with each step, lazily scuffing across the frozen mud beneath her hooves.//

Her hooves dragged across the mud beneath her hooves?

>and begin counting out exact change//

You fairly often use these "start" and "begin" actions, and it's rare that they're actually necessary.

>A Whisper in the Wind//

Book titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>Maybe this one won’t be quite as goofy as I expected, she thought//

>It’s like the author has no idea what she’s doing.//
>Why am I letting him think that I’m angry with him?//
>Any other kind than what I think you’re here for.//
>Here it comes. Any second now//
>Say yes.//
>If I hadn’t made that bet with the students, I might not even be here right now.//
You'd been italicizing her thoughts.

>‘cause//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>starting off in a way that surprised her a bit//

If it surprised her, what was her reaction to it?

>he trailed off//

Redundant. The ellipsis already tells me this.

>She looked down at the table, avoiding looking//

More repetition, and you actually use this word a lot right around here. There are 8 over a span of just 20 paragraphs.

>BIg Mac//

Typo.

>window suddenly lit up with orange light. Big Mac gasped in awe, and Cheerilee scampered over to the window//

Repetition.

>scarlet, orange, and yellows//

Why'd you make the last one plural?

>despite the her attention//

Extraneous space/missing word.

Aside from the mechanical issues, the big thing is that the conflict is so ill-defined here. Cheerilee and Big Mac are incredibly vague about what's actually bothering them, and there's not much built up to make their relationship seem authentic. This is a common problem in stories that show the beginning of a romance, where the end goal of the story is to have the characters agree on a date, have a first kiss, get married, etc. There's not much given here to say why these two characters would want to be together.

From Cheerilee's side, she's concerned she may only be feeling an aftereffect of the potion, and there's not much to suggest she's wrong about that. But what makes her want to be with Big Mac? What is it that she likes about him? What about his personality makes her think they'd be a good fit?

In this type of romance, the relationship itself is as important as the characters, and it has to be developed with the same care. You don't want a flat, one-note character with no motivation to do anything. Likewise, you don't want a superficial relationship that just exists because the story says it does.

This is even more the case for Big Mac, as we never get any insight at all into what he likes about her, either. And then he starts sobbing over her, which leaves me mystified as to why. Rather than try to reinvent the wheel, I'll just link you to a recent blog post Aragon made on developing relationships in fiction. Simply put, the two aren't equals in this relationship, as it's protrayed, because Cheerilee hasn't demonstrated any real reasons beside some vague feelings to be interested, and Big Mac's side is wholly left for the reader to invent.

http://www.fimfiction.net/blog/570705/it-feels-rapey-three-horrible-mistakes-to-avoid-when-writing-romance

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1378

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'm going to list the first word of every sentence in chapter 1 that contains no dialogue.

Dew Drop
The
She
She
She
She
Dew Drop
She
A
She
She
She
She
She
She
Within
Her
She
She
She
She
She
A
She
Dew Drop
Her
But
The
Her
A
Her
A
Tears
Her
The

See how long it takes you to break out of that rut?

Now on to more mundane matters.

>“No, no, no--not yet!” She exclaimed//

Capitalization error.

>She turned on the faucet, rinsed out the mug, and stuck her head under the stream, washing away the sweat from her mane and face.//

Take out the single two-word quotation, then note how you have three sentences in a row that have this "she did that, that, and that" structures.

>She rolled uncertainly off the edge of her bed, and stumbled forward//

You fairly often have these unnecessary commas. The same subject performs both verbs, so you don't need the comma.

>Again, the Princess descended, alighting in front of the shaken filly.//

You use an awful lot of participial phrases. They're not something most people encounter too much in daily life (particularly in speech), so they stand out more easily and it takes fewer of them to sound repetitive. Participles have their own attendant problems, too, and this excerpt illustrates one. They imply concurrent action, but she's not going to alight at the same time she descends. They'd happen one after the other.

>in relief//

These kinds of prepositional phrases that directly identify a mood are pretty blunt. They're basically instructing the reader how to think about the character. It's often stronger to demonstrate the mood. What might she do here to communicate relief? It feels more natural to interpret emotion through reading physical and behavioral cues, since that's how we read each other most of the time.

>the relieved flier//

Changing that last one will make this moot, but you're being redundant here.

Alright, I'm going to do the same thing with this chapter.

Princess Luna
As
The
Luna
Luna
Again
Luna
Luna
Luna
She
Luna
Luna
She
She
Then
Who
She
Luna
His
Coming
He
Luna
He
Reaper
Luna's
Luna
Luna
Reaper
Luna
The
Reaper
Not as bad as chapter 1, but it could still use some variety. It's not so much the sheer number of times it's "Luna" or "she." Well, it's that a little. But it's more that it keeps happening for several sentences in a row.

>Who could possibly have opened a path through her realm without her knowing?//

Up until now, I could have believed you were using an omniscient narrator, but this is clearly stated from within Luna's perspective. It creates an inconsistent feel, since your narrator hasn't taken a personal, conversational tone until now.

>“I think the killer got “behind my back,” if you will, though the victim’s dreams.”//

When you nest quotations, each successive layer alternates using single and double quotation marks.

>“Yeah, it does.//

You never close this quotation.

I'll finally speak up about all the bold-face words. It's preferred to use italics as primary emphasis and bold or all caps for additional.

>other's’//

Couldn't quite figure out how you wanted to make that a possessive, did you? The first apostrophe is the correct one, but note how it's a simple style one, which is inconsistent with the rest of the story.

Chapter 5 is barely in a perspective, but all the clues I see place it in Reaper's viewpoint. You might want to be a little more explicit about your choices. It's fine to switch across chapters like this, but I'm not seeing a purpose to the choices, and you'd spent most of the story in Luna's. If you're going into his head, make it accomplish a purpose. What do we get while there that we couldn't otherwise?

>He replied slowly and gently//

Wow. Now that's some very expository dialogue. It fills the reader in, but it's not the best way to get the reader caught up in the emotion of it.

I'm starting to notice that you use a fair amount of -ly adverbs. They can be informative, but they don't do much to paint a picture. You might want to reel them back a bit.

>faintly-glittering//

-ly adverbs are the exception to the hyphenation rule.

>I can’t...//

It's preferred to leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it begins a sentence.

>sympathy showing on her face//

Unless the moment's pretty unimportant to the story, you generally want to demonstrate emotions instead of just informing. This creates no visual, yet it already gives me the information I need, so I'm not likely to try visualizing it. If you instead describe her facial expression and behavior such that I can deduce she's sympathetic, it creates a far stronger image.

>“I believe poor Twilight may have misinterpreted your words, sister!”//

As a term of address, "Sister" would be capitalized.

>agreed: “kind//

Capitalization.

>Luna rushed forward and stopped Twilight’s descent with her magic//

You've been somewhat in Twilight's perspective so far in this chapter, but you have her blacking out. Be careful that you don't then narrate things she couldn't have seen.

>OK//

Spell it out as "okay."

>N- notes//

Don't leave spaces in a stutter.

>A thin trickle of urine ran down the back of her left leg//

You really like having ponies pee, don't you?

>He turned to Celestia://

First off, this attribution contains no speaking verb. Second, why are you suddenly using this structure so much in this chapter? You hadn't before, and now it seems like every third quote or so does. You don't want quirks like this drawing attention to themselves and away from the story.

>I don’t know Princess//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Twilight spoke//

Wait, where'd she go? There was no indication. It sure sounded like she'd teleported away entirely.

>Taking advantage of Twilight’s distraction//

Again, you seem to just barely have this chapter in Twilight's perspective. So for one thing, how does she read Luna's mind to get at her intent, and for another, if she's distracted, the narrator wouldn't notice what Luna did, either.

>asked quietly, “will//

Capitalization.

>“Racer died about 20 years ago--mining accident. Glimmer died about 5 years ago of old age. Golden Leaf clearly recalled all three as youths or young adults, so Firebrand could fall anywhere in the last 70 years, if he existed at all.”//

Write out numbers that short.

I thought Twilight was supposed to be there with them. We're pretty far into this scene, and she hasn't made an appearance. It's like you just dropped her. Maybe she's not taking part in the discussion, but she's doing something. I guess I see later that Reaper has to share memories with her, but wouldn't it be more efficient to let her observe? Then she wouldn't have her account clouded by his perception. He missed these murders when they happened, after all, so letting her see it firsthand would increase the odds she caught something.

>Luna cried out, “there he is!”//

You have a surprising number of these dialogue capitalization issues.

>She swished her tail in his face, fanning him with her intoxicating, musky scent.//

And whose perspective is this supposed to be in? You've apparently skipped over to Firebrand, who's dead, and they're watching it externally to him anyway, so this makes no sense.

You're kind of skirting the edge of what we can allow for sexual content. Keep in mind that our blog tries to appeal to a general audience.

>he shifted and looked directly into Twilight’s dilating pupils//

That's not a speaking action.

>A series of emotions rapidly played across Twilight’s face: pity, confusion, hope, embarrassment, and abject horror.//

Look at the very first sentence of the chapter. You have a limited narration in Twilight's viewpoint. So how can she see her own face to describe what it looks like? You're going to connect a lot more with the reader by demonstrating these emotions instead of just listing them, anyway. These are just facts. How Twilight behaves is what gives it meaning.

>Luna leaned it//

Something's wrong there, but I'm not sure what you meant to say.

>i.e.//

This abbreviation takes a comma afterward.

>began to breath//

Typo.

>The blue smoke cleared, and Luna was already facing the banner, generating flickering images as Reaper appeared, facing away, looking down the long, dark vaulted hall, focusing on the trailing ivy and broken masonry littering the floor.//

Wow. You crammed four participial phrases into a single sentence.

>your Highness//

Both words are part of the honorific, so both get capitalized.

>dark-gray mare, pointing toward the dark//

Watch for close repetition of words like that.

>facade “the//

Missing punctuation.

>facade//

More repetition. You use this word two sentences in a row.

>Reaper squinted: “that must be Snow Sprite!” he yelled//

Huh? You have two attributions on the same quote, but the first isn't even a speaking action.

>you what//

Extraneous space. And is Reaper channeling Hank Hill here?

>head and//

Extraneous space. You may want to search each chapter for double spaces.

So I'm unclear on exactly where Twilight is. She doesn't go in the dreams with them, but if she's in the regular world, time passes normally for her, right? Then why go into all that explanation of how it might take months, but that time flows differently in dreams? It's just a few hours to her, and she doesn't know otherwise, so why even bring it up?

>Priiiiiiincesss!//

When it's on an italicized word, you'll normally include a question mark or exclamation mark in the italics.

>“I’m not surprised,” Luna responded, “she was a hermit//

The way you punctuated that, you've made the quote into a comma splice.

>find it unlikely you would find//

Watch that repetition.

>bathing Sea Foam in indescribable pain and horror//

How do they know this? You're essentially switching to Sea Foam's perspective, but if they could read her mind, they probably already would have instead of observing it externally.

>‘em//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>nail-down//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>“Oh, Princess Luna!” she cried happily, “how are you, have you been…”//

Capitalization, punctuation, comma splice.

>She flopped face-first into a pillow and let wracking sobs overtake her.//

That's a rather rapid change of emotion. People don't just break into full-fledged sobbing in an instant, and there's not a progression here. She just starts from nothing.

>line-item//

That's not a hyphenated term, not as a noun, anyway.

>he turned back toward a shaken Twilight//

Another non-speaking action masquerading as a speaking attribution.

>what are you hoping to see?//

Capitalization.

>It’s not really all that different from my offloading of memories into your mind, but it would be more efficient, and ensure that I’m not introducing a bias//

...Like I said quite some time ago. Why are they just now thinking of this? It seems an obvious answer. It might be more plausible if they'd thought of it earlier, had a good reason not to do it that way, but now the need to do so outweighs that reason.

>in-place//

No reason to have a hyphen there.

>“Should I stand on a towel?”//

Jeez, what is with this? It's like an obsession.

>Twilight tentatively stepped through first, followed by Reaper, then Luna.//

This is the fifth straight sentence that ends with a participial phrase. It's getting really repetitive.

>‘til//

Backward apostrophe.

>recall....//

One too many dots in there.

>You’re not getting away this time you feeble old bag of bones//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Nightmare Moon now stood above the riven body in her full form, howling like a timber wolf, blood streaming down her face, streaking her breastplate, as a dark mist swirled around her, dissolving everything else like a hot wind.//

That's an awful lot to pack in one sentence. Structurally as well. You have three participial phrases and an absolute phrase (another kind of participial structure) in the same sentence.

>The scene froze as Reaper stepped fully into the scene and examined the faint ripples above Heavy’s body. Luna hung her head as glittering tears dripped at her feet.//

Then in conjunction with my last comment, you have three sentences in a row with an "as" clause.

>“I can do it,” croaked Twilight weakly, “please get me something to drink…”//

The way you have that punctuated, Twilight's quote is a comma splice.

>between the three of us//

"Between" is for two. For more than that, use "among."

>after-the-fact//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>He turned to see Twilight weakly, but accurately, walk across the open floor back to her companions.//

"Accurately" is a really strange word choice here.

>veil”//

Missing end punctuation.

>her long, magenta mane wet, dangling before her chocolate-brown face, covering one eye//

The placement of that last participle really makes it sound like her face is covering one eye.

Okay, chapter 16 easily goes farther than we can allow for sexual content, so I'm going to stop there. You're free to revise the story to a more PG rating if you wish, but as long as it's got this level of explicitness, we're never going to be able to post it.

So I can't say too much about the plot. It kind of strung things out and had the same kind of scene over and over again, which only slightly ratcheted up the tension each time. I'd say it's much longer than it needs to be, as a lot of that tends to blend together and not stick in the mind. Here I am almost halfway into the story, and I know little more of what's going on than I did after the first two. You have to keep interest up, and for those readers who do want to see how this plays out, there's really nothing they'd miss by skimming over or completely skipping nearly half the chapters. On the more mundane side (spelling, grammar, style), I pointed out examples of every problem I saw, but not necessarily every instance of each, so there are some pretty pervasive things that could stand some attention.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1379

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A deep inhale, a long exhale.//

I can give you some leeway, but technically, "inhale" and "exhale" aren't nouns.

>bursted//

The preferred past tense is "burst."

>dusting both creatures//

You just used "dusting" a couple paragraphs ago, and except for very mundane words, most will stick out when repeated so close.

Why are you leaving so much space between scenes? If you;re trying to create an effect, it's lost on me. Some [hr] bbcode will work fine to divide scenes.

>She donned a peculiar, pointed hat//

In this tense, it means she's putting the clothes on, right then. Yet she's unconscious.

>The changeling respected that; the changeling respected the mare.//

You're not drawing me into his viewpoint. All I have is one vague piece of evidence that she's had some trauma, but external evidence, yet he's already decided it's internal as well and that he respects her for it. Show me more of his thought process. As you have it, there's just this cold fact that he respects her, but there's nothing to bring it alive and make me believe it. Especially since he's taking a big risk by helpin her, I really need to know what's got him so invested in her fate, or I have no reason to be on his side, except for the easy, superficial ones.

>wait for her to do her bidding//

She's... going to issue orders to herself? This doesn't make sense.

>They need time to recuperate//

Why are you going to present tense here?

>down. “ …You//

Several extraneous spaces there. You haven't been double-spacing after sentences, and you don't need a space between the quotation marks and the ellipsis.

>until the aura her presence had dissipated//

Missing word.

>This mare had an entire life left.//

How can he possibly know any of this? If he's imagining so, then say that (and bring it alive with some images of his imaginings). But he goes on to state as a fact that she has friends, family, dreams. And there's no way he could be sure of it.

>dying…yet//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>On the far end of the room sat a doorway leading to other caves in the Crystal Mountains, entirely unexplored.//

If they're unexplored, why is there a door specifically leading to them? And how is this even relevant to the story?

>…Within ten seconds//

I don't see the point of the ellipsis. There's no implied pause here. If you want one, just say what happens.

>their bitter taste stinging her mouth//

How does he know this?

>She had a hesitant trust for the changeling.//

Again, how does he know? You're either skipping to her perspective in spurts or having him read her mind.

>He knew that the mare knew the answer already//

You're using a very limited narrator, meaning the narrator speaks the perspective character's thoughts for him. So you don't need to say that he knew something. Just because the narrator says it, it's implied that he knows. However, you do have the problem that if you remove the "he knew that" from the sentence, it's going to sound like you're skipping to her perspective. So put a little qualifier in there to ground it in his perception of her, something like "The mare must have known the answer already." That keeps a tighter perspectve while holding it in his viewpoint.

>He could still feel the heat//

Same deal. If the narrator says something like "The heat from the fire still warmed him," it's implied that he can feel it because of the narrative voice. And then you remove one of the steps between the character and the reader.

>At last the dam broke. Sobs wracked her body//

She already sobbed, which undercuts the "already." And be careful you don't get maudlin. Less is usually more when dealing with emotions. Go over the top, and you make your story seem emotionally manipulative.

>T-thank//

Think about what sound she'd actually repeat. There's not actually a "t" sound in "thank."

>only to//

Extraneous space.

>She nodded once and they continued on their way//

You have two subjects, each performing its own verb, so you'll usually want a comma between the clauses.

>he knew it was large enough for the mare//

Don't tell me he knew it. Just say it was so.

>Eventually, they finally//

Pretty redundant.

>shined a dim light//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense, like what you did to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

>the nearest bank snow//

Missing word.

>because she was too.//

This begs for a comma, or it sounds like there should be an adjective after "too."

>blush//

How does something with an exoskeleton blush?

>discernable//

discernible

>leaving her to face open//

Wording is kind of jumbled there.

While it's not bad, the ending feels very tacked-on. There's nothing foreshadowing it, and there aren't really any stakes attached to it. So the story never comes to much of a conclusion. What message do you want the reader to take from this? Or what new thing do you want him to learn about the characters from it? We at least do get a picture of this changeling, but he didn't change (no pun intended) during the story. He was already taking a risk from the outset, so he didn't undergo any character growth during the rest of it. And nothing changes about Trixie at all. So the death doesn't mean anything. I'm surprised you didn't also tag this as AU, since Trixie clearly didn't die in canon right after the changeling invasion.

So, I'd say: watch the perspective issues, get me into his mindset better at the beginning so I can see why he invests so much in her right off the bat, and decide what you want the story to say to the reader about the characters or some abstract concept. Pointless tragedy doesn't accomplish anything, and I don't see any meaning in hw the ending goes. Maybe that means it shouldn't be tragic, and maybe that means you give the tragedy some purpose. Either way could work, but as it is now, it's not adding anything.

On a sentence/paragraph level though, the writing's pretty good.

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1386

Roll 1d100 =

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1389

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>Scootaloo and Applebloom looked up at Sweetie with confusion//

Describe how they look. Get me to deduce confusion from how you say they appear and act. This is the same thing actors do with their fictional characters, and it works for writing as well. You should always beware of directly telling me a character's emotion or motivation. There are times it can work, but for the majority of your writing, you want to demonstrate these, not feed the conclusion to the reader.

>Sweetie Belle said in a panic//

You're using a limited narrator, in that you've had the narrator give Sweetie Belle's stream of thought for her. So there are two things to say about this excerpt in that regard. For one, if she's panicked, she's probably not in a mental state to conclude that. She'd be too focused on what mental images and physical sensations are going on to reach a diagnosis. The other thing is that she essentially is the narrator. It depends on how limited a narrator you want, so you don't have to do it this way, but you have the avenue open to you. You could have the narrator sound panicked as well, shouting and having wild thoughts.

>Applebloom hopped around the tree-house in glee//

You're drawing a conclusion for me again. Make me see her glee, and you won't need to tell me. On the emotional side, the red flags to avoid are emotion/mood words as adjectives (he was sad), adverbs (she walked happily), and prepositional phrases (he sighed in relief).

>Sweetie said, frustrated//

And again. I hope I've pointed out enough of these to give you the picture. I'm not going to mark any more.

>"Let's write down a list of everything we can think of first, then worry about the details, okay?" Scootaloo said. "Here. Let me do it."//

By now, I'm seeing very little narration in this conversation beyond the speaking actions. You don't want to lose that visual aspect to the story. The sheer number of one-line paragraphs says you're probably skimping on description. There's a section at the top of this thread under "talking heads" that will explain. For that matter, the one on "show versus tell" also gives a little more information on emotional cues.

>The usually white cheeks of the unicorn were growing more and more pink by the second.//

This goes back to perspective again. Any time the narrator has said something that's not purely factual, it's been something Sweetie Belle knows or perceives, or one of her opinions. So the narrator is restricted to Sweetie Belle's experience. But the way you've worded this, it's external to her. She can't see her own face, so she wouldn't know what color her cheeks were. She might know she was blushing by how they feel, but not how they look, unless she has a mirror handy.

>She traced a hoof on the floorboards and her ears turned downwards.//

Here's an example of where you did it right. You haven't mentioned one word about how she feels, but it's plainly evident. You do need a comma in there, though. When you have multiple subjects that each perform their own verbs, you'll usually want to put a comma between the clauses. You don't when there's one subject with multiple verbs or multiple subjects performing the same verb. There are some examples at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

>Sweetie said over-dramatically//

Perspective. Why would she make this judgment about herself? Or if you were trying for an omniscient narration, this still represents an opinion, but it's one not attached to any character.

>Now zen sir and madam.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>miss-ure//

Why spell that phonetically? "Monsieur" would do fine.

>WOAH//

My kingdom for a writer who can spell this correctly.

>Sweetie's face went red and kicked her hoof against the wooden floor.//

Sweetie's face kicked her hoof?

>GOODNESS"//

Missing punctuation.

>what's the most important thing dear//

Comma for direct address again.

>"That's right. Now then, run along or you'll be late!//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

Okay, I'm only going to talk about new issues I see in chapter 2. I see most of the same problems, so there's no need to spend a lot of time rehashing them all.

>Featherweight thought to himself//

>she thought to herself//
These are in consecutive paragraphs. You'll want to avoid repetitive word choices or phrases.

>from a far//

afar

>to set it's sights//

Its/it's confusion.

>But, mixed with that was also a tinge of excitement.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly.

>song. Her//

Extraneous space.

>Two ponies that were extremely close together//

Ponies would be a "who," not a "that."

>I try see my sister//

Missing word.

>fearing another silence would set in//

This is an example of a time where you spell out why a character does something, and like emotions, these things are often better left to implication than outright statement.

>'I don't know what I'd do if Dad had to travel for long periods of time... but I guess he must be used to it. It's weird how we can all be so similar but experience things so differently.'//

Note how at times you have the narrator ask Sweetie's questions and make her comments for her. Then at other times, you present such things as Sweetie's quoted thoughts. There's a bit of a disconnect in doing it both ways simultaneously. It can be done, but pay attention to which delivery method makes more sense for the narration.

>What can I get you today?~//

It's preferred not to use a tilde like this.

>Togeth-,//

Doubling up on the end punctuation.

>for sometime//

In this usage, you need "some time" to be two words. There has to be a noun to serve as the object for the preposition "for."

>looking at him with concern//

Most often, you'll set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>one in a million//

You're using that whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>"Featherweight looked at her and his eyes were wide in shock.//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>A Date//

Capitalization.

So, really the few biggest issues are the telly language, the inconsistent narrative voice, and some slips of perspective. They're fairly pervasive, but they're by no means insurmountable, and this was a rather cute story. I'm not particularly well-read on this genre, though it strikes me as the type of plot that must be very common. So it's possible that it might be hard for you to stand out against the crowd. I'll leave that to a specialist in shipping to decide. You're on the right track, anyway. If you can clear those things up, I'd call it a fun story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1393

Looks like the paragraph indentation is pretty uneven. That's probably an artifact of importing from GDocs, or you might have used tabs, which screw FiMFic up. Even a fixed number of spaces can go awry, since FiMFiction stretches to the margins. But since you're putting a blank line between paragraphs, you don't even need to indent.

>wake up calls//

wake-up

>The scroll left my claws, and I gleefully fell back into bed.//

So make him sound gleeful. The narrator is Spike, so the emotion should be there right as he tells it. So use the word choice and delivery to your advantage. If he's gleeful the narration should essentially sound like what a gleeful person might say, not only in what he says, but how he says it.

>Maybe I could even conjure up a better dream; maybe something with ice cream, or Rarity, or both.//

Unless it's used in a complex list, you should be able to split a sentence at a semicolon and have both parts stand as complete. What comes after it here isn't a complete sentence. It could stand on its own as a fragment, so you could make it two sentences, but the formality of a semicolon doesn't really support doing it as is. A dash would also work.

>everything!//

Normally, you'll want to italicize a question mark or exclamation mark attached to an italicized word.

>Did I miss a deadline, or a some last assignment?//

The comma's unnecessary, and you seem to have some jumbled wording.

>I felt myself getting magically lifted out of bed and deposited on Twilight’s back.//

This has got to be my biggest complaint about the story so far: Spike has no personality. If this were an omniscient narrator, it'd be fine, but you have Spike himself telling me the story, yet he tells me factual statement after factual statement without any emotional attachment to it.

There are a couple of ways to take this. If he's in the moment and telling me the story as it happens, then the emotions are also at the forefront for him, and that should come through. If instead he's telling some audience well after the story's events have happened, he'd have the benefit of hindsight, and he would only show a reaction to things that still move him. He couldn't get surprised, for instance, unless he's deliberately embellishing for his audience. Yet you don't frame the story as him telling anyone specific, so the in-the-moment version is the only one I can assume.

So make the narration sound like him. A little of the word choice seems a tad advanced for him, but not so much that it's outlandish. More to the point, it sounds lifeless, and it's not the kind of thing I could envision him saying out loud in the show. That should be your test. Maybe not every individual sentence, since he's going to have to be factual at times, but the narration should still be peppered with the kinds of things that would make believable show dialogue. I'm kind of exaggerating here, but it should reek of his voice enough that if I read a paragraph that had no clues to his identity, I could make a reasonable guess as to who the perspective character was. For instance, using a ton of fifteen-letter words is obviously a poor choice for Scootaloo, and sounding like a street thug is obviously a poor fit for Rarity. This narration has a very neutral feel. It doesn't sound youthful, excitable, or any other characteristic I'd expect of Spike, perhaps except for well-read, if it hasn't gone too far in that direction.

>If Princess Celestia wants to see me this early//

Needs a comma after this to separate the clauses.

>Delivering mail isn’t anything new, but mail for me definitely is. I brushed a claw against the elegant lettering. My name never looked so good in print.//

There you go. You're starting to let a more personal voice creep in, but you don't want the beginning to sound so dry. You need to hook that reader and make an immediate connection with the character. Even what you have here could stand to be spiced up. It's got some personality, but he doesn't sound excited about it.

>Spike’s not the only one around here that can cook.//

You're talking about sentient characters, so they'd be a "who," not a "that."

>I’m not so sure about that. There’s a reason I make Twilight three meals a day.//

Slowly getting better, but inject this with some emotion. I don't get any clues as to how he feels about it other than making the joke. Is he smug? Mad that she's trying to take credit for some of the cooking? Resigned to her always saying this?

>Twilight’s stopped.//

How does he know this? He's stating it as a fact. He must have some evidence from her behavior to come to this conclusion, so let me see it, too.

>either of you need me//

"Either" would be considered singular here, so "needs." It takes the number of the individual items it refers to, or if they're mixed and listed out, the one closest to the verb.

>feeling just as unprepared and nervous//

Yet there's nothing in the narration to communicate this. If he's unprepared, shouldn't he be asking internal questions about what to do? If he's nervous, shouldn't he be stammering or looking for a source of comfort, for instance? The following sentence gets at it in essence, but not in delivery. It says the right thing, but it says it so calmly and factually. Look at the contrast between his narration and the next piece of dialogue he has. It's easier to go more over the top in dialogue, so that much would be overboard for narration, but that's still the direction you should be looking. The narration is essentially his internal monologue, so it's still going to sound roughly like speech.

>laying on the floor//

Lay/lie confusion.

>If I hadn’t been so close//

Needs a comma here. You have separate subjects, each performing their own verbs (I hadn't been, I wouldn't have been), so they're separate clauses.

>You said an explorer pony found my egg on the edge of Equestria, and brought it back to Canterlot.//

This is the opposite issue. A single subject performs both actions (pony found... and... brought), so there's no need for a comma.

>“Yes, although there’s more to the story, more than I felt was prudent for you to know at such a young age.//

Missed your closing quotation marks.

>I found your egg abandoned, and tried my best//

No comma.

>I said this//

You have to be very careful about using "this" in such a manner. It makes him sound rather self-aware of the story.

>Celestia finally looked at me, and smiled.//

No comma.

>M-My//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway. You do this multiple times in the story, but since it's an easy rule to understand, I'll leave it to you to sweep for the rest.

>Wild dragons are migratory, and rarely settle in the same area twice.//

No comma.

>According to a treaty I made with the dragons centuries ago//

But the dragons can cross it? They had a migration near Ponyville, and one started hibernating nearby. Sounds rather one-sided. I wonder what the benefit to Equestria is. Anyway, that's just me musing on the world-building here. It's not so important to the story.

>Part of what made the library, and Ponyville, home was that they were all a part of it.//

Repetitive wording. Part of it is that they were a part of it?

>If it’s too dangerous for us//

Needs a comma after this.

>I hate it when she says that.//

Short of sounding a tad more conversational (things like asking a question, making an exclamation, emphasizing a word), this is what I was looking for last chapter. This really sounds like something Spike might say aloud to himself.

>I understand that you’re upset, Twilight//

You were right on the verge of this last chapter, and I'll go ahead and speak up about it. You have Celestia use direct address more than I'd expect to hear in a real conversation. She's done so in two consecutive times speaking to Twilight now.

>We could’ve started a whole new section of the library dedicated to Why Spike Should Not Go Adventuring Alone. I don’t want to dwell on all that, though. What matters is what happened next, once Celestia’s repeated words//

This really, really sounds like Spike is telling this story to someone well after it all happened, and I'm not sure that's a can of worms you want to open. For one thing, it's unexpected. You do see stories spring this on the reader once in a while, but it's tough to pull off. Generally, when you do this, you want to have the story open with that frame of Spike sitting down to tell someone. For another thing, it means you do have an audience for the story. Not some generic implied one that all first-person stories have, but something more specific. Sipke's not just telling the story to thin air; comments like this would only be address to an audience present (or who might read a transcription of it later, I suppose). Now the audience is a character and needs to be defined as well as any other character. Things like: Why is the audience there? Who are they? Why does Spike want them to hear this? Why do they want to listen? It's often easier to avoid the issue altogether.

>The bag I’d fashioned out of a handkerchief and a stick//

A bindle, if you want to use the proper term.

>If I didn’t go//

Needs a comma here.

>What was going on? Where were my panicking friends?//

There you go. This chapter is doing a much better job of portraying Spike's voice through the narration.

>Mind of I go//

Typo.

>Her coat felt damp with tears.//

The whole thing? You might want to specify something like cheeks.

>she glanced down at my pile//

You've punctuated that like a speaking attribution, but there's no speaking action. Maybe you wanted to do it like an aside? Here's how:
“Spike—” she glanced down at my pile “—clearly

>saddle bag//

Be consistent about whether you make this one word or two. One is preferred.

>She looked just as worried as Twilight.

You're doing quite a bit of bluntly telling me what emotion ponies look like they're feeling instead of giving me the evidence to figure it out on my own. You get more leeway on that for a first-person narrator, especially when he's describing his own feelings, but that leeway runs out at some point. You want to bring the characters alive by creating that mental image, not giving me the information that makes it unnecessary to do so.

>If I closed my eyes//

Needs a comma here.

>guarding a hoard of eggs that looked just like mine//

Does he know what his egg looked like? It's not something I'd assume, and he hasn't indicated how he'd know.

>big exhibition on the outskirts//

The outskirts of what? Equestria? You've only mentioned cities so far and multiple ones, so it's unclear what this refers to.

>A pony wouldn’t sit like this on the train, not when they could just scoot back and rest their front hooves on the seat.//

I'm not sure why he says this. Is he making a point? It doesn't set mood, and it's pretty extraneous.

>There’s a whole lot of nothing out there, not a single pony around for//

One the one hand, you have some canon support for this. There really wasn't anyone else heading out as far as Twilight & Co. in "The Cutie Map." But on the other hand, why in the world would the train company operate a stop where nobody goes? It'd have no chance of turning a profit.

>I watched it retreat down the tracks for a minute and imagined the conductor watching//

It's not clear that you're intentionally repeating "watch" for some effect, so it comes across as an oversight.

>and as long as I could point myself in the direction of the train tracks //

Needs a comma here.

So far, chapter 3 is getting into some rather advanced word choice again. It's not the best match for Spike.

>hoof prints//

That'd be one word, like footprints.

>still, I still//

Repetition.

>Come on Spike.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I still didn’t believe it.//

Then you're using "still" again quite soon after those other two.

>was six//

Extraneous space.

>Dragons come through here every year by choice, that means there has to be gems around here some//

Comma splice.

>And then I found where river used to be.//

Missing word.

>wondering if my screams could’ve carried all the way to Ponyville//

What screams? He didn't explicitly do so, and he doesn't sound startled.

>A few seconds later I actually looked at my claw and saw that it just had water on it.//

Wouldn't that be his first reaction? I mean, he's checked his whole body over but skipped the one spot he felt something?

>rock-turned spear//

Hyphenate all that.

>nearly-buried//

The exception to hyphenating descriptive phrases is when it's a two-word phrase beginning with an -ly adverb.

>again!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>Maybe it’d help you out with Rarity, you know how she swoons over upper class stuff like that..//

Comma splice, and you have one too few or one too many dots on the end. (I'd vote for using a period here, what with the sheer number of ellipses you have in this conversation.)

>midway up the summit//

Seems like a usage issue. There's no halfway up the summit, because the summit is the top.

>before gravity started to take cover//

I assume you meant "over."

>You think I’m a baby, does that mean you think I don’t know what I’m doing?//

Comma splice.

>My previous mission//

Repetitive use of "mission" from the previous sentence, and I don't see a deliberate effect being created by doing so.

>if I wasn’t paralyzed with fear over how and where I was going to land//

So why doesn't he sound afraid? At least he starts asking questions next, but for one thing, they sound blandly worded for his current mood, and for another, the fact that he's already calmly identified his fear makes him seem awfully self-aware of the narrative. It could work that way if you had a frame and audience established, but that'd be a lot of work to implement.

>to not be//

not to be

>still screaming//

Extraneous space.

>awesome!//

Italicize the exclamation mark, too.

>you’ve got this Spike//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Thanks. I… I guess I’ll see you back in Ponyville.//

He's not going to answer her about Thunderlane?

>Rainbow glanced back towards Equestria and shrugged.//

Just used "back" in the last sentence.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1394

>>1393
>Rainbow Dash was home now, completely safe and probably really angry.//
Realistically, though, how long would it take her to get back there again? Why is he so sure she won't?

>Maybe I was just a little baby that’d made it this far on luck alone.//

He'd be a "who," not a "that."

>an opening bigger than the side of a house//

You've already used "opening" three times in three paragraphs.

>walking into the dark.//

>//
>I walked//
Repetitive.

>I kept a hand against one of the walls, and soon found myself tracing my claws along the deep gouges that lined it.//

No comma.

>five hundred year//

You're using that whole phrase as an adjective for "nap," so hyphenate it. And the comma that follows is a splice.

>S-Snap//

>W-Where//
>Y-Yes//
>M-My//
Capitalization.

>There wasn’t any sun to keep out of my eyes, but it wasn’t like the tunnel could get any darker than it already was.//

Three uses of "was" in a single sentence? That really tends to grind the action to a halt. You could clip everything after "darker" off, anyway. Try this:
There wasn’t any sun to keep out of my eyes, but the tunnel couldn’t exactly get any darker.

>the tunnel wall, or at least a wall//

Seems like he'd emphasize "a."

>as if the mountain itself was flexing its long-dormant muscles//

You're making a hypothetical statement, so use subjunctive mood: "as if the mountain itself were"

>The next blast of air traveled into the cave instead of out//

Asides like this don't get capitalized.

>t-think//

What sound would he actually repeat? That word doesn't even have a "t" sound in it.

>You are like no dragon//

Extraneous space.

>; beads of fire from the dragon’s nostrils.//

Misused semicolon.

>When I first went to sleep//

Needs a comma after this.

>fleeting world of night at day//

Did you mean "and"?

>a hoard, and a brood//

No reason for a comma there.

>moss, cobwebs//

You just mentioned those, and there's no effect I see in the repetition.

>If I hadn’t stood there myself//

Needs a comma after this.

>my father//

He mentions that so calmly. Not even a bit of emphasis or a pause? This is a pretty momentous realization for him.

>his limbs shook under is weight//

Typo.

>an elder dragon, and his version of a hoard//

No need for that comma.

>something too big to a vial//

Missing word.

>All I had to do was pour it over myself//

Needs a comma after this.

>just in time//

You used "just" at the beginning of the previous sentence, so it feels repetitive.

>I don’t remember a whole lot of what happened next.//

Now you really are sounding like he's telling someone this story well after it happened, but you never framed it as such. Either way's viable, but you're straddling the line, and you can't do both.

>Twilight and I’s//

Twilight and my

>She nodded without hesitation.//

Is it reasonable that he still wouldn't have returned? If not then I bet Celestia would try at least once to ask him if she could let Twilight know he was okay, even if it meant also telling her to give him some space for the time being. But if he wasn't exactly expected back yet, then Twilight might not be worrying so much. Still, I wonder if Celestia wouldn't suggest it to him, though I do think she'd abide by his wishes.

>I’m truly sorry everypony//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I tried to sleep away who I’d come from.//

Technically, "whom," but since this is in Spike's voice, it's up to you whether he'd know that and employ that usage in this situation.

>if I was, I’d be a giant monster//

He'd actually been a giant monster twice in his life so far. Does he have any thoughts on that?

>or few days for all I knew//

This even more cements my feeling that Celestia would have urged him to let her contact Twilight, as long as she gave her assurances that she'd advise Twilight to let him deal with things on his own for now.

>There goes Sugarcube Corner//

Why'd he switch to present tense? In the last paragraph, he started describing the dream in past tense. I understand the choice, but you might want to switch to it as soon as you're in the dream narrative.

>who I was hurting//

>who I was actually speaking to//
Again, "whom," but again, it's up to you whether that fits your voicing of him.

>night, long after the days and nights//

Kind of repetitive.

>Whilst you dwell in distant Ponyville//

Needs a comma here.

>not when you have friends like myself//

Reflexive pronouns really only get used when the subject is the same person or thing. "Me" is more appropriate here.

>still gave me the sense//

You're barely into this scene, and it's already the third time you've used "still."

>and once the day breaks//

Comma here.

>all over the room//

Might want to use a different word, as you just had "room" in the previous sentence.

>It wasn’t just about staying warm, the blanket helped me remember that all my friends were still thinking about me.//

Splice.

>A tear ran down my face.//

The single tear is pretty cliched.

>She’s still an amazing friend and I want her to be happy.//

Needs a comma.

>mom… my real mom//

Just because of the sheer number of ellipses you use, I'm going to suggest you re-evaluate how many of them are really necessary. You don't want some detail or quirk about the writing like that stand out and take attention away from the story. You aren't misusing them, but you could probably feel comfortable eliminating some and changing a few others to periods or dashes.

>That's-//

Please use a proper dash. It'd take too much time to mark every instance of this if it's a persistent problem, so I'll just say to sweep the story for them.

>The difference is that Celestia is in charge of her routines, for Twilight it’s the other way round.//

Comma splice.

>H-Hi//

Capitalization.

>… and//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis. And if we don't have the first part of the sentence that one completes, capitalize after it.

>My Dad//

Capitalize when you use "Dad" on its own, but not when you make it more generic by putting the "my" or other such modifier in frot of it. That makes it so you're not using is as a name anymore.

>He’s… He’s gone.//

You don't have to capitalize after an ellipsis. You have been through the story, but where it makes sense with the syntax to have the sentence continue (stutters included, as this effectively is), you can leave it lower case.

>That’s it I guess//

Needs a comma.

>Her tear-streaked eyes glanced up at me.//

Up? She's pretty tall, even sitting. I don't see anything that puts her in a position to be looking up at him. She bowed her head, yeah, but that's odd to roll her eyes up or contort her neck or something. And even so, her head's pretty big. Even with it bowed, she'd probably be pretty level with his eyes.

>Celestia gaze//

Typo.

>I took a deep breath, and started to write.//

>I threw the bag on my shoulder, and smiled.//
No comma.

>Being happy didn’t mean I had to forget everything that happened, I just had to be able to deal with it.//

Comma splice.

>She’d drawn a series of horizontal lines with chalk//

You just described them as a series of lines two sentences ago.

>read my way up the wall//

Third use of "up" and second of "up the wall" in only two sentences.

> I retrieved the chalk that Twilight had left on a nearby table, and made a new line to the right of the growth chart//

No need for that comma.

>I took my time heading back home. The train ride just takes//

Watch that repetition.

>I bought a ticket for the last train of the day, and whiled away the afternoon in some of my old Canterlot haunts.//

No comma.

>kind of party, which was kind of//

>all of my best friends all//
>just recount everything that just//
More repetition.

>I’d definitely been gone longer than anyone expected//

Yeah, I'd think Celestia would have at least broached the subject of letting them know he was okay, in that case.

>H-Hi//

Capitalization.

>Princess Celestia informed us that you were on your way//

I was wondering if you'd get to that. Still waiting until today to tell anyone and never asking Spike about it seems a bit much. If he'd forbade her from it, that'd be one thing, but he barely brought it up, and at a level much more benign than that.

>Sugarcube corner//

Capitalization.

>hard to breath//

Typo.

>Never mind, that can wait.//

>we were cool, there weren’t any hard feelings//
Comma splice.

So, this is a good story. There are a few issues, though some of them I could live with if I had to. There are times that comma splices can work in dialogue or limited narration, for instance, but more when it's supposed to sound rushed or preoccupied, and you don't really have that. Another is Spike's voice, at least in terms of maturity level. He has a vocabulary and tone that's beyond what we see of him in the show, and there was nothing to place this significantly later than what's happened in the episodes so far. You do get some leeway for this, but the more it sounds like Spike to the reader, the more engaging it will be.

The other two things that really are problems are again with the narrative voice. Even at times he's going through a lot of emotional turmoil, the narration often sounds very calm and factual. This would normally be a problem for any limited narrator, but especially for a first-person one. Sometimes, you do fine with this, but your narration is mostly quite muted, which really feels disconnected from his experiences. And the last thing is one I've also commented on: the feeling t you create in a couple spots that Spike is very self-aware of this being a story, as if he's telling it at some future time to an audience. You never did frame the story as such, which would need to occur at the beginning or end (ideally both, perhaps even with some intermediate points as well). You never did, though, and I don't think you even intended to, so I don't know what effect you were going for there, but it sets up a dissonance in your storytelling.

Under that is a nice story, and I'd like to have this come back nice and polished so I can post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1421

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>Sugar Cube Corner//

Sugarcube Corner

>once and while//

once in a while

>foggy pane was the last one left not frosted over//

Seems like you're at least missing a word, but that's pretty awkwardly phrased anyway.

>ad-hoc//

You're using a fairly limited narrator in Apple Bloom's perspective, in that he's expressing her thoughts as his own at times. And he takes a very conversational tone at times, like in your third paragraph. That makes Apple Bloom effectively the narrator. So it's odd when she uses phrases like "the filly" or "the yellow pony," because it implies that's how she thinks of herself, and it implies this is a term she'd use, but it sounds awfully advanced for her.

>rattling through them. They made her think of dancing skeletons, rattling//

Watch repeating a word in a close space like this.

>"Course I'm worried," The old pony snapped back, "But//

Multiple capitalization issues.

>shut the last shutters//

More repetition.

>wood on the windows, the sun had set an hour back. Only the lantern and the soft glow of the wood-burning//

And more.

>searchin' for.”//

Here, you switch from simple-style quotation marks and apostrophes to fancy-style ones. Be consistent through the story.

>Neither of them were//

"Neither" here refers to individual, single items, so it's treated as singular.

>She shoved the two logs in, and pushed them into place with a poker.//

That's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>not wanting the fire to go out from a sudden draft or something//

Beware spelling out character motivations or intentions so bluntly. There are more elegant ways to get that information across.

>Put the poker back in place, and hurried back to her blankets.//

Odd to have a fragment there, since your narrative voice hasn't been consistent about doing so or taking quite that informal a tone.

>‘n’//

And now that you have fancy apostrophes, you have to make sure they go the right direction. Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward.

>‘bout//

Another backward apostrophe. Just sweep through for these, unless you switch them all to simple style.

>didn’t make even it in time//

I'm not sure what this is supposed to say.

>Applebloom didn’t want to leave her cocoon of quilts, but…well, she got the feeling that this story was important.//

For how personal a voice this narration takes at times, particularly like this excerpt here, note how little of the story's emotion it actually conveys. It's very calm and factual, even when Apple Bloom isn't.

>a sadness settled over her face//

Rather than directly identify it as sadness, why not describe it in such a way that I can visualize it and conclude on my own she's sad? That makes for an engaging read. Think about the ways an actor would get you to think his character was sad. He appears and behaves in was that give you the evidence. For the most part, written characters should do the same.

>Photo Album//

Why are you capitalizing that?

>’Course//

You're skipping a word, not a few letters, so you don't need the apostrophe. You do this again just a few sentences later (and miss the capitalization), but the first time you used this in the story, you didn't.

>20//

Spell out numbers that short.

>night…call//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts the sentence.

>at some point, but they marched on an’ on an’ on, followin’ the wind. At some point//

More repetition.

Word to the wise: you're doing an awful lot of visual accent for Granny Smith, and it quickly gets very tiring to read. You don't want to go overboard on that. The reader knows how she sounds, and they'll fill in most of that for you. It's more about word choice and phrasing than phonetic writing.

>…how to put it…//

She said almost precisely the same thing in the last paragraph.

>Great-Gramma//

Why is this capitalized?

>KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK SLAM//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration. Just describe what's going on and how it sounds.

>Applebloom dropped the poker, and pounded on Applejack’s shoulder with her hooves.//

No comma.

This isn't a bad idea for a story. In fact, it's so good that we've gotten two others in recent months with almost the exact same premise. Then the issue becomes whether yours stands out against the rest, and it doesn't, really.

Part of that is because of the problems I noted with the narrative voice. I noticed that near the end, you transferred over to Applejack's perspective, and that's fine, but you didn't give her narration a feel that's distinct from Apple Bloom's. They have very different personalities, so that should come through in their narrative voices.

Another thing is that there isn't a strong story arc. You have a twist, which works out fine, but aside from the surprise value (and for that matter, I found the ending confusing and had to read the author's note to get it, but I'm not that sharpest tool in the shed, so take that for what it's worth), the twist doesn't accomplish anything. Some stories get get away without doing either of these, but almost always, it's in spite of not doing them, not because of not doing them. Anyway, those things are to set up and resolve (or at least suggest potential resolution of) a conflict, or to develop a character, either showing growth over the course of the story or showing the reader something unexpected and enlightening about them. I don't get a new mental picture of any of the characters from what happens in the story, and there was no struggle to overcome anything. So what do you want the reader to take away from the story? What meaning do you want it to have? Think about what kind of moral or message you want it to have or what new appreciation you want the reader to gain for one or more characters. If you can give a purpose to the story instead of just having it be some events that happen, then you'd be ahead of the game.

The writing quality itself was good, so I'm not concerned on that front, and I think you have the ability to put that last piece in there.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1436

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>on the way to their migratory routes//

Why not just "on their migratory routes"? They have to go somewhere to get on the route? That doesn't make a lot of sense.

>but she couldn't help but notice//

How about "but she couldn't help noticing" to avoid the repetition of "but"?

>the entryway was already slightly ajar//

The door is ajar, not the entryway. You're going kind of purple so far, and it's not always working. You don't want to choose more complex words just for the sake of doing so, and trying too hard often results in words that don't quite fit.

>Fluttershy hesitated, her foreleg wavering at the threshold, uttering a sigh.//

Participles like to modify something close before them, ideally the nearest noun or pronoun, so "uttering a sigh" tends to describe the threshold. You have to go back through her foreleg as well before you get to the correct target. You don't want participles located so far from what they modify.

>whimpers of fright//

These prepositional phrases that identify an emotion or modd are almost always redundant with something already in the sentence. A whimper connotes fright anyway, so you don't need to add that.

>beryl eyes//

There are two problems with this. First, most readers aren't going to know enough about this word to decipher what color you mean. At least it's a canon character, so they should already know, but if you did this for an OC, you're making most readers skip over it without figuring it out or having to go look it up, and it's a bad thing to make readers leave your story. To avoid that kind of thing, it's often a good idea to add a little context clue to the word's meaning. The other issue is that beryl isn't even a determinate color. Beryl can be many different colors; when pure, it's colorless. But it can commonly be many disparate colors, like blue, pink, and green.

>spinal damage and frayed pages to indicate that they were much, much older//

Avoid over-explaining things like this. The reader can figure out they're probably old. Or if they're in poor condition for another reason, Fluttershy isn't exactly pointing that out, either. It's what the reader will assume.

>It was nothing more than a bundle of papers; some of them torn, but all of them bearing scorch marks.//

You've used a number of semicolons so far, but this is the first I've caught you misusing. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>Fluttershy's heart sank at the sight and she paused for a moment to reflect.//

You have two separate subjects, each with its own verb, so there are multiple clauses, and most of the time, you'll want to separate them with a comma.

>A voice that she did not recognise interrupted her reminiscence and she felt her ears pricking up in interest.//

Same deal.

>whomever was speaking//

It's the subject of this clause, so you actually need "whoever."

>Creeping a bit closer//

Around here, I'm noticing that your indentations are inconsistent. This is often an artifact of importing from GDocs. Fixed numbers of spaces or tabs can both produce unexpected spacing, since FiMFiction stretches lines to the margins.

>One of her best friends of the past few years;//

Another misused semicolon.

>Embarrassed and frightened//

This is one of the emotional high points of the story, so it's probably not the best place to draw the emotional conclusions for the reader. Make her look and act embarrassed and frightened, and the reader will come to those conclusions on his own.

>who merely shrugged//

Another dependent clause you'll want to set off with a comma.

>just as bewildered by the pegasus' behaviour as he was//

You've been tiptoeing on the edge of having a limited narrator in Fluttershy's perspective, and there are a few incongruencies with that, like referring to her as "the pegasus" (implying that's how she'd refer to herself), but I can let most of those go, since your narrative voice is in kind of a gray area. But you're definitely having her read Spike's mind here, or else you've gone full omniscient.

>Twilight said as tenderly as she could//

And now you're in Twilight's head. Only she would know it was "as tenderly as she could." You don't want your perspective to jump around like this, unless you want to commit to using an omniscient narrator. What makes it limited are the times you have the narrator express Flutterhy's thoughts for her, particularly when it also takes a conversational tone, like asking a question, trailing off, or emphasizing a word.

>a look of surprised indignation//

Again, don't force the conclusion. Just tell me the facts about her expression, and let me judge what emotions are causing it.

>trying to mask her hurt//

And you're in Twilight's perspective again.

>early-”//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs...

>“-No//

...from either direction.

>unable to believe that the pegasus was this upset about a minor act of discourtesy.//

In addition to spelling out emotion, you also want to avoid over-explaining a character's motivations or thought processes. Depending on what kind of narrative voice you want to use, there are more elegant ways of doing this, but I won't get into it until you've decided that.

>cursing her inability to just make herself heard//

Now you're back to Fluttershy's head. There's a fine line, but the way you're wording these things is a little too subjective to work for even an omniscient narrator. I'll talk a little more about this at the end, but it's a pretty important decision you need to make about your story.

>Angel Bunny comforting presence//

Missing a possessive.

>Principal's//

Why is that capitalized? You'd only do so when it's attached to a name, which makes it a title.

>With a sigh that sounded surprisingly loud//

And here's a huge indicator that you want to use a limited narration. "Surprisingly" is an opinion, and only a limited narrator can express an opinion. Well, that's not an absolute rule, but that'd get into a complex discussion that doesn't apply to this story. So when the narrator expresses an opinion, the reader has to be able to attribute that opinion to a character. Then the narrator essentially becomes that character. So you don't want to have the narrator taking on different personas too often.

>Sticking her tongue out to cool it//

You're using an awful lot of participial phrases lately. It's something that authors with intermediate experience latch onto for a bit of variety, but they often go too far with it and actually make it a repetitive structure. You don't hear a lot of these in everyday conversation, so they stand out more easily, and they can quickly sound repetitive. You even start two consecutive sentences with them. And remember what I said about participles synchronizing actions. You have her saying this quote with her tongue stuck out. I don't think you intended that, as you don't make any phonetic effect or say her speech was altered.

>house and home. “You offered to house//

Even though they're used in different senses, you generally want to avoid close word repetition like this.

>I came over to the discuss the special arrangements//

Extraneous word.

>here-” another quick sip, but this time she remembered to blow on the warm liquid first “-the//

Dashes.

>eager to correct her misapprehension//

Another spot where you unnecessarily spell out a character's motivation.

So, the conflict's a little weak here, as Twilight doesn't struggle with it at all, but it's hard for this kind of thing to be anything but low-stakes. I'm prepared to live with that. The two things that are still bugging me are that it's a little too purple for its own good, and the aforementioned perspective issue.

Really, the narrator's perspective isn't something I'm going to get into a lengthy discussion about until I know what you intended to do with it; just note that it comes across as a mostly limited narrator who jumps from head to head a lot. The purpleness ties into that as well, since a limited narration implies that such word choice is characteristic of the one holding the perspective, so for one thing, that may fit Twilight, but I don't think it fits Fluttershy well, and for another, it doesn't change when you go from one to the other, so you're not differentiating their voices. But now I'm getting into the discussion I said I wouldn't have yet, so I'll leave that for later.

This is a nice story with some good writing to it, so if you can fix these things (note that on many of the mechanical issues, I pointed out examples, but they're not an exhaustive list), I can see posting the story, but before I can give you advice on fixing the perspective, I need to know whether you wanted to use a limited or omniscient narrator, or if you'd even made a conscious choice. So if you want to reply, then I can delve further into what it'd take to get the narrative perspective squared away. Here is fine, or you can reply to the email message.

In the meantime, I have some sections at the top of this thread that cover common story problems, and the ones that turned up here are "dash and hyphen use," "comma use with conjunctions" and "show versus tell." "Head hopping" might also apply, depending on your choice of narrator.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1444

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>sun shined//

This is the transitive form, like what you did with boots or brass. You want "shone" here.

>ninety-percent//

>ten-percent//
No reason to hyphenate that.

>days was//

Subject-verb agreement.

>She didn't hate it to be honest//

Without a comma, it sounds like she doesn't hate being honest.

>clumsily-made//

You don't use hyphens on two-word phrases beginning with -ly adverbs.

>Lead Bassist//

Such a term isn't typically capitalized, and it more commonly be referred to as principal bassist.

>her life was about to be suddenly changed//

You're really flip-flopping on perspective here. This is decidedly external to her, as it's something she wouldn't know yet, but just a paragraph ago, you very clearly had the narrator speaking her thoughts for her. This could stand to be more consistent.

>As for the rest of her brain, they thought up one simple line.//

"Rest" is a collective term here. You'd treat it as singular.

>Trying to shout at the top of her lungs for some ponies, any ponies to come and rescue her from her predicament, the leader, pulling the rear, lit his horn and magicked her mouth shut.//

This says the leader was calling for help. And somehow using Octavia's lungs to do so...

>last second//

And now you do need a hyphen. You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective.

>Growling//

She just growled two paragraphs ago.

>They were soon shut up by a loud yell, which continued to speak as the other two kept quiet.//

A yell spoke?

>Gods sent//

Hyphenate.

>But, it was not the first time that Octavia woke up like this.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one is not.

>But this time//

Pretty repetitive to start two sentences in a row with this.

>awoke - shrouded in black and unable to see - she//

Please use proper dashes.

>almost like glow in the dark lights in a way//

That's a really jumbled wording, and I can't quite decipher it. I guess it's that "glow in the dark" needs to be hyphenated.

>And as Octavia looked down at her mouth//

How would she look at her mouth?

>Not wanting to pay attention to their lousy banter, Octavia's eyes//

This says her eyes didn't want to pay attention to the banter. While true, it's not surprising or informative.

>It was no time for witty comparisons, she had to find a way out of here.//

Comma splice.

>"Look, Lock Jaw, it's not my fault that the other way around was a bucking mountain," a mare spat back, "what else were we supposed to do, climb it?"//

The way you have that punctuated, the quote would be a comma splice.

>A short hum was issued.//

I don't see the point to much of the passive voice you use. It brings the action to a halt.

>We've got ta take these grabs out to the meeting area, we don't have any time to waste.//

Another comma splice.

>Sorry Lock//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>This place is dangerous as Tartarus at night, hay the only reason we're prob'ly still alive is because there's four of us//

Another comma splice. I'm not going to mark any more of these. Suffice it to say there are a lot of them.

>an oddly impressed expression//

Why would she describe her own expression like this? She's essentially the narrator. More immediate than what it looks like would be the effects of the emotion behind it, like what impressions are in her mind and how it makes her feel physically. It's even more odd since she couldn't see it herself, so how does she know what it looks like, much less draw a conclusion from that visual that she'd already know internally anyway?

>her eyes panicked about to search for anything of interest//

How? You've already said it was pitch black and she couldn't see anything.

>Octavia's curiosity skyrocketed//

About what? You're leaving that completely up to the reader to determine.

>the mare's magenta irises//

She's effectively the narrator. Why would she comment on her own eye color? And why would she refer to herself as "the mare"?

>Grumbling to herself//

This is the fifth sentence out of the last eight that you've begun with a participle. It's getting very repetitive. And this one in particular says her hoof grumbled. There are several dangers associated with using so many participles, and you've found them all: misplace modifiers, dangling participles, and synchronization problems.

>yards away in the distance//

Yards isn't really far enough away to qualify as "in the distance."

>Wiping the dust off her body with a huff of annoyance, her eyes//

Yet another dangling participle. She's presumably the one wiping dust away but she doesn't even appear. This says her eyes wiped the dust away.

>W– What//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

I'm going to stop after this chapter, since it's getting really bogged down in repetitive participle use and their attendant problems, along with comma splices and some perspective-related issues. I can only assume these problems persist through the rest of the story, so be sure to go through all of it. I'll press on into further chapters if you care to resubmit and it looks to have improved.

I haven't read the story that inspired this one, so I can't say whether it borrows too heavily from it. I contacted The Descendant in case he had an opinion, but I haven't heard back. It's possible that could become an issue later on, but for now, it isn't.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1470

>dirt covered//
You're using the phrase as a descriptor, so hyphenate it.

I'm starting to see a pattern in your sentence structure. Your eighth, thirteenth, fifteenth, nineteenth, twenty-second, and twenty-seventh sentences end in a participial phrase. Your first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and ninth sentences all end with an absolute phrase (the ninth actually ends with two!), which is another kind of participial structure. That's just the first screenful. You don't want to get in a rut like that, or the narration starts to feel like reading a list.

>Her horn ignited with a violet aura and a harsh lavender light washed over the tavern.//

You have two clauses there, so you'll usually want to put a comma between them.

Now a word about perspective.
>two imposing figures//
This is a decidedly external perspective. These are the only two characters around, and neither one of them would describes themselves as such, so it's somebody else's opinion. I don't know whose, though, and it's definitely an opinion, which doesn't mesh well with a typical omniscient narrator. Here are a few more examples of the narrator expressing an opinion:
>a harsh lavender light//
>a homely warm brown//
>an almost immaculate Twilight Sparkle//
This is the first one that's easy to attribute to a character who is present, as it could certainly be Luna's opinion. If she's who you want as your perspective character, then establish that early on. The "imposing figures" still wouldn't fit her viewpoint, though.
>Symbols seemed to wander across the surfaces in slow waves.//
Well, either then wandered or didn't. "Seem" is an odd qualifier, and assuming this refers to a spell, wouldn't Luna recognize it anyway? And certainly Twilight would, since she apparently cast the spell, but I'm still going with Luna as the limited narrator, since there's no evidence to the contrary.

Okay, back to the perspective issue more generally:
>manipulating something on their exterior as she did so//
Yes, you're definitely in Luna's perspective now, since Twilight would know exactly what she was manipulating. So I'd say make it clear in the first paragraph that Luna's the perspective character (and keeping her identity as a reveal for the next paragraph wouldn't work, since she's not going to hide her identity from herself, and the limited narration is essentially in her mind) and lost the bit about "imposing figures," since she wouldn't think that about herself.

>Grabbing and cleaning two ceramic tankards from behind the bar with her magic, she put them under the taps//

Note that participles make things happen simultaneously, so you have her grab the tankards, clean them, and put them under the taps all at the same time. Surely, that'd happen in sequence.

>Her horn flared up and in the hearth a roaring fire appeared.//

Another spot where you need a comma between clauses. This one is actually needed to avoid misunderstanding, as at first glance, the "in" appears to be another direction her horn flared, until it's revealed as a preposition instead of an adverb a few words later.

>Tell me Twilight,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

>delicately manipulating the lever to regulate the flow//

Now you're in Twilight's perspective. You could phrase it as Luna figuring this is what Twilight is doing, but stated as a fact, she's reading Twilight's mind, especially since she doesn't really understand what's going on yet.

>With enough time complex chemical processes break down some of the components and after a set time you get a beverage…//

Needs a couple of commas.

>old fashioned//

>twenty seven//
Hyphenate.

>She looked perplexed//

A limited narrator should never (well, there are some specific exceptions, but I won't get into those) evaluate her own expression. For one, she can't see it, and for another, the mood itself would be far more prevalent in her mind than thinking about what she looked like. So use the limited narrator to your advantage: make her sound perplexed in the narrative tone.

>She glances to Luna.//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>The two alicorns drank//

This feels external again. Why would Luna refer to herself as an alicorn inside her own thoughts? For that matter, what's the point of making that distinction anyway, since that's all that's left alive?

>hundred mile long//

Hyphenate.

>She quaffs the rest of her mug.//

And again with the present tense.

>She got out of it?//

This happened a few years ago, and Twilight's never heard of it until now? That's rather convenient...

>Twilight deflated, and lowered her sight to the table.//

That's the opposite problem: it's all one clause, so you don't need the comma. One can still be used at times where there's a reason to make a thematic division, but I don't see one here.

>Luna drank a bit//

You're falling into an agonizingly common trap here. Nearly every action you've had them take with their drinks is some variation on this. I don't know what makes authors lose all creativity when their characters are sharing a drink, but surely you can come up with a few more things to have them do than this.

>The things that come out of such spells are//

Again, very convenient that Twilight is only now sharing this. It's not apparent that Twilight has been hiding this out of shame or anything, and if she'd shared it earlier, it would have fulfilled the same purpose she's bringing up now: serving as a cautionary tale.

>she forced a brief smile//

Jumping to Twilight's head again. Without couching it as Luna's interpretation, only Twilight would know it was forced.

>once faithful//

Hyphenate.

>then looked at it with a tinge of sadness//

You're having her externally evaluate her expression again.

>Twilight filled it up again, and deposited it in front of Luna.//

No comma needed, and this action is getting a little repetitive, too.

>I have meditated for a long time about our condition. Becoming an alicorn had some hidden conditions//

Repetitive use of "condition."

>deposited carefully on a side//

Not sure I understand this phrasing. A side of what?

>the other alicorn//

Another strange use of this kind of phrasing, considering the perspective.

>the the//

Repeated word.

>I am not sure what would happen to you, maybe with the world itself destroyed you would disappear//

Comma splice. It's also worth looking at the prepositional phrases you sometimes use to open sentences. It's a more American usage to always set them off with commas, but in a case like this, I think it makes the meaning clearer. Without one, it can easily look like "you" might be the direct object of "destroyed."

>Celestia is my friend beside being my sister//

besides

>probably be still here//

In this order, "still" feels more like you mean "unmoving." I'd recommend putting it before the verb.

>Sound of splintering wood and crashing stone//

Shouldn't that be "sounds"?

>The blushing disappeared and she snickered.//

Needs a comma.

>Luna laughed out.//

Did you mean "out loud"?

>there will be a lot less of them still standing//

"Less" is for collective quantities, like money. You need "fewer."

>yet still//

Redundant.

This is a nice story that stands out from most "lonely alicorns are the only ones left" types. Really, the biggest issues I had with it are fairly subtle ones, so they're understandable for authors to make who aren't quite experienced, and they're the kinds of things readers might only notice on a subconscious level or not at all.

Take that structural repetition near the beginning. It didn't persist throughout the story, so on the whole, it doesn't kill things, and I could probably live with it if I had to. It's more a matter of if you want to make this story the best it can be, or if you want to call it good enough as is. Same with the perspective. It creates an undercurrent of disconnect from the character, but it only happens in a few places. So at least fix the detailed things that would only take a couple seconds each, and I'd also ask you to take a stab at these two things. Particularly, I hope you understand my point about the perspective, since that's a big step to take as an author. There are certain things that when they click, your writing becomes noticeably better, and having a firm grasp of perspective is one of them.

This is close enough, though, that I won't have to give it a full read, so when you're ready to resubmit, please choose the "back from Mars" option.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1473

>He left early and his lights usually went out after he had a drink on his balcony around ten.//
You have a lot of sentences like this, where you have multiple clauses that could use a comma between them. It's natural to put a pause in there, and it sometimes clears up ambiguity of meaning to do so. Basically, it's dependent on whether all of the subjects perform all of the verbs. If they do, then you don't need a comma. Here, there are separate subjects that each get their own verb. (He left... and... lights... went...) There are some exceptions, and you actually have one of them in your story, too. If you didn't make any exceptions, you wouldn't be wrong, but I wanted to point out what sorts of situations do allow you to break the rule. Here's one:
>back when her boldest piercing was the one through her tongue and her hair was only discoloured by a few blue streaks//
Normally, you'd want to put a comma after "tongue" to separate the two clauses, but the way the sentence is worded, they're both a condition for the independent clause that comes after these. They're essentially like a list of two items, which flows better without a comma. Another common construction that works the same way is this: If [this clause] and [this clause], then [this clause]. It's usually some kind of conditional thing like that where the exceptions apply.

Anyway, I'd just ask you to sweep through the story for these kinds of things. They're not the end of the world, but they do make your story cleaner and at times easier to understand.

>That day the seat next to her was eventually filled//

The introductory element you have here (that day) is something Americans will commonly set off with a comma, but Brits often don't. It's not a big deal either way, except there are times it can actually change the meaning. If you put a comma here, that intro just lets me know when this occurred. Without the comma, it sounds more like it's setting up a conditional, like "that one day the seat got filled, this other thing also happened."

>She had to look away from the blank first page, it was impossible not to imagine the number of pads like that which had been bought by aspiring artists//

Comma splice.

>“You make music?” He asked her while she smoked.//

Now that we finally get some dialogue, I see this will be an issue. Unless it starts the sentence, a dialogue attribution doesn't get capitalized.

>The man started laughing with enthusiasm//

This story is just full of things like this and the comma issue, where they don't occur enough to be too problematic, but they do stand out a bit. You can get away with some of this, but it's often better to present the raw evidence and let the reader draw his own conclusions where character emotions are concerned. What about the laughing makes her decide it's enthusiastic? Let me see that, and if you do your job right, I'll settle on it being enthusiasm, just like you want me to. It's more engaging that way, because you make me think about it and momentarily put myself in the character's place. One major exception is when you have a first-person narrator or a limited third-person (like you do here) describing his own emotions. The character will focus less on certain things than he might about other characters, like facial expression. That's a good indicator of emotion, but for those types of narrators, he can't normally see his own face so it's odd for him to describe it, for instance.

>landlady wasn’t using for his other tenants//

If it's a land"lady," why are you using "his"?

>“Yeah, we did.//

This indentation is off. In fact, quite a few of them start getting wonky around here.

>Octavia did not look reassured.//

How so? What does this look like?

>in which neither of them were staying//

"Neither" takes the number of the individual items it refers to (or if those items are mixed, the one closest to the verb), and since "Vinyl" and "Octavia" are both singular, "neither" is, too: "neither of them was staying."

>dimly-lit, thickly-carpeted//

This is the exception to hyphenating multi-word descriptors: two-word phrases beginning with an -ly adverb don't take a hyphen.

>a new rooftop club//

Pretty repetitive to use the exact phrase so soon after the last time.

>publicist//

Same with using that word twice so close together.

>looking a little worried//

What about her makes her look worried?

>Octavia didn’t say anything, but was fighting to keep her grin restricted to an encouraging smile.//

You're jumping over to Octavia's perspective here. How would Vinyl know this? If you couch it as Vinyl's perception of it, fine, but it's stated as fact.

>Vinyl brought her palms down at the table//

Odd choice of preposition there. "At" implies she moved them in the direction of the table but probably never actually got there.

>They don’t go for the music, these gigs are photo ops.//

You have an awful lot of these comma splices, especially in dialogue. They're just two complete sentences tacked together with a comma.

>Vinyl actually smiled at that, it hadn’t been what she was expecting.//

Some people can excuse comma splices in dialogue (I'm not one of them), but it's a lot tougher to accept them in narration.

>Vinyl could detect a tiny bit of shame in Octavia’s eyes.//

How so? What does it look like?

>Pulling her hair back by running her fingers through it//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>the teacher’s would kick them out//

Why is that apostrophe there?

>a dreamy distance washed over Vinyl’s features//

I talked about his earlier. Vinyl's pretty much the narrator. How could she see her own face to know this?

>Octavia looked up again she found Vinyl watching her intently, waiting for her to continue//

The "she found" sure tends to put this in Octavia's perspective.

>The cellist looked like she hadn’t finished, but was unsure of whether to say what her instincts suggested.//

That's a lot to read from a look we don't get to see.

>She finally looked Vinyl in the eyes.//

And then you use "looked" again in the very next sentence.

>When the cellist raised her face she found the DJ nodding, as if in agreement.//

More of that "she found," plus the "as if" here is definitely showing Octavia's perception of events. If you want to move to her head, fine, but be prepared to stay there for a while, and make sure the shift accomplishes something that staying with Vinyl couldn't.

>A little guilt came over her//

The trick to avoid directly naming emotions for the perspective character is to have the narration voice what thoughts the feeling would cause. Something like "Great. As if she needed another reason to feel bad."

>“You’re starting to sell me.” She said//

So in addition to the capitalization problem I mentioned long ago, you also have a punctuation problem that didn't turn up before, since the other ones I marked didn't end in a period. If you have an attribution following speech that ends in a period, you change the period to a comma.

>kids movie//

kids' movie

>girls school//

girls' school

>The look of pure elation on the DJ’s face told her she had decided on her victory too soon.//

Your narration had so consistently been clearly in Vinyl's perspective until recently, but I'm catching a number of these little slips into Octavia's.

>base clef//

bass

>The song was this terrible piece, all glissando.//

I'm trying to imagine what such a piece would even sound like. You get enough musical terminology right that I'll wager you know what the word means and used it intentionally, but it still creates a strange image. I dunno, something like "Shaker Loops," maybe?

>Octavia gave her a look that said she’s better keep it in//

Typo.

>And it was on my hip”//

Missing period.

>“It’s going to be a cello.” Said Octavia.//

Punctuation/capitalization.

Okay, first, some more technical matters. You go without speaking attributions, most of the time, which is fine, as long as it's clear who's speaking. And therein lies the rub. The two don't really have distinctive enough voices to tell them apart on tone, so then it falls to either subject matter that only one would be discussing, using attributions, or keeping track of who's speaking. What further muddies the waters is that you often have one character's actions in the same paragraph as the other's unattributed speech. I'm not a stickler for saying you can't have mix one character's action and another's dialogue in the same paragraph, but it helps if that action is a direct prompt for or reaction to the dialogue. And for the most part, you do. But all that taken together meant that multiple times I had to backtrack a bit to figure out who said what. That throws a huge speed bump into the story.

I'd recommend you get some better cover art. It's an unfortunate truth that people often decide whether to read your story based on whether it has enticing art. And a little goes a long way. Even slapping a screenshot of EqG Vinyl and Octavia is a decent strategy. Or find something nice on DA or derpibooru and ask the artist if it's okay to use it.

There are lots of consistent comma problems, both with splices and clauses. The latter is covered a bit with examples in a section at the top of this thread (comma use with conjunctions), though I may have given you an even more thorough one already. I have a section on dialogue capitalization and punctuation, too, though I can;t be sure your problems there weren't just carelessness, as you intermittently did them right.

Another common problem: your story, at least the first part, is rife with "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring. People want to read about what happens, not what is. It's impractical to get rid of all of them in a story, but you should strive to minimize them where you can. Even with their usage tapering off some for the rest of the story, I still counted 339 of them (at least of the forms that are easy to search for using Ctrl-f), which for your word count is a little less than on every other sentence. You do get a pass for using them in dialogue, since people don't creatively avoid them there, which would lead to unnatural-sounding speech at times. But the overall numbers still suggest you're right on the edge of having far too many.

Now to some more aesthetic matters, but before I move on to that, let me say that I don't want you to get the impression that the things I've mentioned already or will mention below make this a bad story. I actually really enjoyed it, and I think you show some good talent. If I thought it was a bad story, it wouldn't have been worth my time to compile all these notes. I'm doing this precisely because I think it's a good story, and I want to help you polish it up to where it can really shine.

The first part of the story has a very formal narrative voice. The long interaction between Octavia and Vinyl didn't. So for on thing, that's inconsistent. There can be reasons for such an inconsistency. Maybe the two have different perspective characters, or maybe they're from very disparate points in a character's life, where she speak as a child in one and an adult in another. But you don't have anything like that, so it leaves things feeling like they're disconnected between the two parts of the story, like they're not the same character.

This becomes even more of an issue since the narrative voice in the first part doesn't even match the character well. When you use a limited narrator like this, it's not that different from first person. Vinyl pretty much is the narrator, so the narrator needs to sound roughly like her in personality, vocabulary, tone, word choice, etc. So when there isn't a change in those things about Vinyl to explain that inconsistency I spoke of, that's why it leaves the parts of the story feeling fractured. But it's also why the narration in the first part doesn't form a good connection with Vinyl: her speech sounds so different from her narration, and there's not an explanation as to why (like she might be dumbing her speech down to suit her audience, when she's not actually like that, so her narration, essentially her thought processes, sound closer to her true self).

The next issue, which I saw brought up in the comments as well, is that I fail to see any connection with the first part and the rest of the story. This interaction with the neighbor doesn't come up in her talk with Octavia, nor does it develop her character in a way that informs what happens during that conversation. It feels completely extraneous. Don't get me wrong—it was wonderfully atmospheric and well written. It just felt like two stories tacked together than a single coherent one. I can't for the life of me figure out how Octavia crying at the end of it tied into what followed. My best guess is that the portrait showed her in the same pose she said she liked in Vinyl's tour posters. Vinyl reflexively lapses into such a pose, it seems, so it's perfectly reasonable that the neighbor might have observed her doing that on her balcony and decided to paint her that way. But Octavia's revelation that she likes that pose didn't come charged with enough emotional investment to make me think it would bring her to tears. So I'm just left mystified as to what this is supposed to mean. Though that's not necessarily a strike against you—I'm not one who reads between the lines too well.

Next is a plot issue. They agree that they've only seen each other four or five times before, but their relationship certainly doesn't seem to bear that out. That's awfully casual for Octavia to be willing to tell her secrets, some of which she's apparently already told, since Vinyl knew about the tattoo. Octavia crying about whatever it was before that long final scene, too. That speaks to investment in their relationship. Fewer than four or five meetings doesn't. And then in the cab ride at the end, they're well acquainted with each other. I don't mean just their actions, but in Vinyl knowing what of her piercings Octavia liked best, and in her feeling like what they were doing in the car was very familiar. Maybe they were joking about the number of times they'd seen each other, but if so, it's not at all apparent. And on the other hand, their conversation does tend to reveal that they don't know all that much about each other yet. And for what they did before Octavia's performance, that seems pretty extreme if they're really that new to each other. Maybe that's just me being prudish and maybe that's that author pushing a fantasy of the way he'd like this type of thing to go beyond what's more believable in the real world. So when they were in the closet, was that just a means of tension relief for Octavia? Or do they actually mean something to each other? I have to say, the story has a much bigger message if they're actually in love, but there's not a lot of evidence of that on display, the [Romance] tag notwithstanding. That's the primary mission of a story where romance plays a prominent role: get the reader to believe that these two characters have good chemistry, that they go well together, that they're really in love beyond taking the narrator's word for it. You do have some of that, like the little gestures they use to show concern to each other. But I sure didn't come out of the story feeling like these two are in love.

I'll grant you that that may not be the main goal you wanted the story to accomplish. It's always nicer to see stories that happen to have romance in them versus romances that an author cobbles a story around. However, the message you want to convey with this story is already hazy enough without having the romance be extraneous to it. Nothing monumental happens here, so that leaves character growth as the point. Here's what I got from the story on that front: Vinyl's a little more complex than most people give her credit for. Octavia rediscovered her love of making music for its own sake, and Vinyl's another in a procession of events in her life that have drawn her out of her shell, but it's unclear how much she actually needs Vinyl for this or would regress without her.

Altogether, there are quite a few "I don't know"s about this. I don't know what significance the neighbor had, I don't know what any of this means to Octavia, I don't know whether they're really in love. And it just weakens what message the story has. You know, this may even be a victim of the format. Even if this interaction with the neighbor proved to be pointless, it still creates atmosphere. But when it's the only scene doing that, it sticks out as extraneous. If you had something novel-length, you might have had a number of such scenes, just presented to give you snapshots of the protagonist's life. I've seen plenty of books do just that. But when you've got something relatively short here, the reader will want to know why he spent 25% of his time on something that didn't matter. So make it matter. You may have already intended for it to, and it just flew over my head, but I don't see the connection between all these elements of the story, and tying them together can only help unify an already subtle message you're attempting to communicate.

Lastly, some technical matters. We do have restrictions on content, since we try to appeal to a general audience, and these are guidelines handed down from Seth. They aren't our judgments to make. So we don't allow references to real-world drug use or obvious parallels. You'd have to get rid of the marijuana references, which shouldn't be difficult to change to something more benign—her dizziness coming from fatigue or some such. The more oblique reference where Octavia asks Vinyl what drugs she's on is probably fine. On the sex side, allusion is fine, and fade-to-black segues to off-camera things are fine, but the pretty explicit mention of "four or five minutes before I had to go in there I was burying my face between your legs" is too much. It's fine to drop hints so the reader can put together that this is what she means, but stating it outright goes over the line. What they do in the taxi is tame enough.

I'd like to see this story succeed. Even if all you did was address the content issues and make a halfway decent stab at fixing all the commas, I'd probably be willing to post it, but I hope you want to make it shine as much as it can. If you have questions or feel like I've misunderstood something, please don't hesitate to respond, either here or through the email (which would take a little longer).

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1478

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>half there age//

Homophone confusion.

You write a really thick accent for some of these characters, and it makes it more difficult to read. It's enough ti describe their accent briefly, then rely on word choice and phrasing. When you write too much of a visual accent, it slows the reader down.

>She glared at the alicorn as they followed her happily-bouncing filly back through the tables.//

This presents an issue with the perspective. First, let me backtrack a bit. Look at the paragraphs that starts with "She laughed and pranced away a few steps," particularly the last few sentences in that paragraph. You clearly have the narrator speaking Zap Apple's thoughts for her. So you're using a limited narrator. You don't want to change the perspective character too often with one of those, but I don't see any problems with that so far. But there are a couple ways in which you're being inconsistent with the limited narrator. For one, it's only very occasionally that you put any of this conversational tone in the narration. You'll want to pop something in like that every few paragraphs at least to keep that feeling up so it's steady for the reader. Keep reminding him who holds the perspective. The other problem goes back to the excerpt at the top of this comment. With a limited narration, Zap essentially is the narrator, so when you refer to her as "[Dash's] happily bouncing filly," it implies that Zap is referring to herself that way, that she sees herself from such an external viewpoint. It's pretty rare that a limited narration would need to use anything but the focus character's name or an appropriate pronoun. Oh, and you don't need to hyphenate that term. Two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb don't take them.

>gratefully lifting the mug//

"Gratefully" is a subjective term; it's someone's opinion. Only Twilight knows for sure if she's grateful, but she doesn't hold the perspective. Zap does, so unless you show me the evidence that Zap would use to conclude Twilight is grateful, stating it as a fact means she's somehow reading Twilight's mind.

>Hay, if I of all ponies don’t blame you, what right do you have to do so?//

The more this paragraph goes on, the less it sounds like something Dash would actually say. Though I'll allow that you have her as more mature and formal now. We'll see how the rest of the story plays out.

>how— You//

Don't leave a space around an em dash.

>The mare nodded when she heard Rainbow Dash’s plans.//

Perspective again. Why would Zap-as-narrator refer to AJ as "the mare"?

>by the time the four ponies reached the house – the newcomers having evidently met up outside – the delicately floral tablecloth was joined by various colorful, if somewhat faded, birds//

That sounds like an awfully formal and advanced speaking style for Zap.

>pegusus//

Typo.

>the plates clinking as the filly washed them helped cover the rest of their conversation//

That's a rather convoluted phrasing. It took me a few read-throughs to get it.

>caught up with the them//

Extraneous word.

>Don’t know how you do it everyday.//

For it to parse right, you need "every day" to be two words here. As one, it's an adjective, and there's no function for an adjective at that spot in the sentence.

>pegusi//

You should probably scan through for these, as it seems like the misspelling may be pervasive.

>You got it, cousin!//

Is this Braeburn talking? You go with so much unattributed dialogue and so little narration during conversations at times that it's hard to keep track of who's speaking.

Why does Strongheart speak so formally? She sure didn't in "Over a Barrel."

>it wasn’t until they passed the schoolhouse that Truehooves felt he was safe//

So now you're in Truehooves's perspective, but you couldn't have been at the start of the scene, because he wasn't there yet. I mentioned something about this before. You don't want to jump from character to character unnecessarily. Could you tell this scene from Zap's viewpoint? Or could you start the scene when Truehooves actually got there?

>can not//

Cannot. You do this twice.

>we loose a lamb//

Lose. You do this twice, too.

>the sheep lead the two//

The past tense is "led."

>Truehooves considered it for a moment//

Now that I'm halfway through the story, I can say the narrative voice is very inconsistent. The paragraph that starts here takes a very personal voice in Truehooves's perspective, much like the one I noted in Zap's long ago. But paragraphs like this are few and far between. Most of the story has no identifiable perspective, leaving the story feeling more omniscient. So decide whether you want it limited or omniscient. If you want it limited, then sprinkle more of this tone throughout the story. If you want it omniscient, then you need to redo passages like this that speak with one of the characters' voices. The other issue is that if you want to use a limited narrator, compare this paragraph to the one I noted for Zap. They sound pretty identical. You want each character to have a distinctive voice. When their limited narration sounds identical, then they lose their uniqueness as characters. For that matter, you'd want to keep their dialogue sounding different, too.

Now's as good a time to bring this up as any. I'm more than halfway through the story now, and it's wandering around pretty aimlessly. There's no conflict that's been brought up so far, and there's no avenue for character growth developing. I don't see any sort of point the story's working toward. It may end up having one, but you can't string along the reader but so long before having some impetus to what's happening. It started out being a slice-of-life thing about getting a gathering together, and now it's morphed into these teo going off on their own, and besides some vague notion that they're concerned about Apple Bloom, there's nothing driving the story forward. What is it that you want me to be interested in so that I'll keep reading? I'm afraid people are going to get bored with this and give up.

>diein//

dyin

>nearly-white//

No hyphen.

>but wooden wall//

Seems like there's a missing word here.

>It ain’t the best for it, but leechweed should help take the edge off your memory as well. I’d rather your mind worked everything out on its own, but seems like it could use help.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

Why did you go to present tense for this final scene? I don't see a reason for it. If you had framed the whole thing as a recountin, it would make sense, but without a clear reason, it's just jarring.

Okay. I have to say the writing itself is good. But these are the issues that stood out to me, most of which I've touched on already:

The story can't decide which narrative voice it wants to use. It's mostly omniscient, but a definitely limited voice pops up at times, which only leaves the whole thing feeling inconsistent. Furthermore, the first part of the story seems to use Zap's perspective, while the second part takes Truehooves's, but there's little difference between those voices, and there are a few breaks from both.

So much of the dialogue relies on a heavy written accent, which just makes it slow and difficult to read. And so much of the dialogue goes unattributed, and the similarity in voices only exacerbates the problem of keeping track of who's speaking. There were times I had to reread passages and times I just gave up trying to figure it out.

I don't see a point to the story at all. Some events happen, but they don;t seem connected at all. The biggest theme was learning a sense of family from grazing, but for one thing, it's an impromptu message that none of the characters was looking for, and for another, it's not carried through to the end with some sort of conclusion drawn. It just goes away. There was some minor tension involving whatever is up with Apple Bloom, but nothing came of that, either, and it was such a vague thing in the first place. The vast majority of stories work by doing one or both of the following: set up and resolve a conflict or show some character growth such that a character changes in a fundamental way, the reader learns something new and compelling about a character, or a character learns something new and fundamental about another character (even if it's something that reader already knows). None of that happened here. What is it that you want the reader to take away from this story? How is it that you want the world or at least some part of it to be different as a result of this story's events? I don't see that anything of consequence happens.

I hope you can come up with a point for the story to make, because the writing is good and deserves attention.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1482

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>But when the changelings attacked friendship didn’t win the day, love did.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. Otherwise, it initially sounds like you're saying the changelings attacked friendship.

>There was no yelling, no thrashing around only a stoic expression, an attempt to preserve whatever dignity was left.//

Missing a comma.

>the Queen’s expression didn’t change. She was a wall, her expression a bland, black stone that refused to change//

Pretty repetitive.

>but no reaction was elicited by Twilight’s presence//

The passive voice is pretty ungainly (including what you already used earlier in the story), but here, it's also harming your characterization of Chrysalis. This is a deliberate choice of hers, yet by phrasing it as something that just happens to her, it takes away her part in it and also renders it quite emotionless for her.

>and each expected the one to start being aggressive with the other//

Awkwardly phrased.

>k…. killed//

One too many dots there.

>the Queen resigned from her struggle and calmly closed her eyes, she snorted in an attempt to battle her own emotions//

That comma is a splice.

>as Chrysalis slowly opened her eyes, a glittering trickle rolled down her face.//

You've punctuated and capitalized that like it's a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb.

>Shouted the Queen behind her//

Capitalization.

>Elements//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this.

>regarding her ignorant and immature//

This is probably the biggest issue with the story. You draw a lot of these conclusions for the reader. Give the reader the evidence he needs to make his own judgment. You'll rarely want to spell out how someone feels or their motivation for doing something. Focus more on the context clues you could pick up if you were there witnessing it. Consider what kinds of things an actor does to get you to think his character is sad. He makes sure that he looks and behaves certain ways so that you'll deduce sadness on your own without him ever having to say it. Written characters work the same way.

>What she saw there was something beyond a simple reflection.//

>The Queen of the changelings was in pain, and Twilight wondered for a moment if she should call a doctor.//
About here, your perspective keep wavering back and forth between the two. You don't want to do that with a limited narrator.

>to think//

Extraneous space.

>Tartarus on Equestria//

Odd choice of words, since Twilight already made a reference to Hell.

>Perhaps this was only the surface of what lie beneath the tough exterior//

Verb tense.

>They would hearing the infernal infection's voices//

Some jumbled wording there.

>will.The//

Missing space.

>within a, explosion//

Typo.

>low pitched//

You're using the entire phrase as a single descriptor, so hyphenate it.

>T-that’s//

Consider ­what sound she'd actually repeat.

>Remember Chrysalis//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>raised her hoof and caressed the cheek of her former enemy, and as Twilight raised//

Watch for close repetition of words like that.

I'm unclear why Twilight says what she does at the beginning. It led me to believe she'd become disillusioned with friendship toward the end, especially since it sounds like she's summing it up after the fact. But then the story ends on a completely different note. I get the feeling you didn't mean for the beginning to sound like it takes place after the rest, but it may come across that way.

I'm not clear on what Chrysalis says about killing her friends, either. They were corrupted by the nightmare beings, so she had to kill them? But she wasn't referring to the other changelings that attacked Canterlot with her? It sure sounds like she says she killed all them, too, but I don't know why she would have.

Anyway, I've marked each type of problem I see, but only the first instance of each, so it's up to you to sweep the story for them. The only really pervasive ones are the sometimes too-blunt emotions instead of working by implication, and the constant shifts in narrative perspective. It might help to rad the section at the top of this thread on "head hopping."

It's not a bad story at all, and if you can get those things under control, I could definitely see posting this.

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1493

>>1470

>I'm starting to see a pattern in your sentence structure. Your eighth, thirteenth, fifteenth, nineteenth, twenty-second, and twenty-seventh sentences end in a participial phrase. Your first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and ninth sentences all end with an absolute phrase (the ninth actually ends with two!), which is another kind of participial structure. That's just the first screenful. You don't want to get in a rut like that, or the narration starts to feel like reading a list.//



I admit I had to look up those definitions, but I think I understand what you mean. I'll see if I can fix this in a satisfying way.


>Now a word about perspective.//


>>two imposing figures//


>This is a decidedly external perspective. These are the only two characters around, and neither one of them would describes themselves as such, so it's somebody else's opinion. I don't know whose, though, and it's definitely an opinion, which doesn't mesh well with a typical omniscient narrator. Here are a few more examples of the narrator expressing an opinion://


>>a harsh lavender light//


>>a homely warm brown//


>>an almost immaculate Twilight Sparkle//


>This is the first one that's easy to attribute to a character who is present, as it could certainly be Luna's opinion. If she's who you want as your perspective character, then establish that early on. The "imposing figures" still wouldn't fit her viewpoint, though.//


Ok, here my problem is that I was thinking about a camera placed inside the tavern, and the different perspective shifts corresponded to different shots. Which is all well and good but doesn't exactly work in a narration. I had this very visual sequence of scenes in my head, and imperfectly translated that in words. This fundamentally means I'll have to rethink a few sentences in the sections you pointed out to have something consistent.


>>She glances to Luna.//


>Why are you switching to present tense?//



Here I have no justification, only an explanation. Originally this was all written in present tense and I missed a few verbs in the rewriting.


>>She got out of it?//


>This happened a few years ago, and Twilight's never heard of it until now? That's rather convenient...//



Here's my first question. I tried to imply that a couple of decades have passed since they have seen each other, so Twilight had no idea that Celestia had switched mood. Did this not come across in the story? DO I need to make it explicit somewhere?


>>Luna drank a bit//


>You're falling into an agonizingly common trap here. Nearly every action you've had them take with their drinks is some variation on this. I don't know what makes authors lose all creativity when their characters are sharing a drink, but surely you can come up with a few more things to have them do than this.//



Right, I was trying to avoid this problem by interweaving the drinking with other actions, but I suppose that at a certain point we can implicitly consider that they continue to sip from their mugs without telling it.


>>I am not sure what would happen to you, maybe with the world itself destroyed you would disappear//


>Comma splice. It's also worth looking at the prepositional phrases you sometimes use to open sentences. It's a more American usage to always set them off with commas, but in a case like this, I think it makes the meaning clearer. Without one, it can easily look like "you" might be the direct object of "destroyed."//



Comma splice aside (I fixed it) I'm not sure I understand. How would it be possible that in the sentence "Maybe with the world itself destroyed you would disappear" the "destroyed" could be associated with the "you"? I'm trying to read it in a such a way and I'm failing. Now, English is not my first language so maybe I'm missing something here, but if you could explain it to me I would be very grateful.



Thank you for the comments. They were quite instructive and I will try to fix the story as much as possible. It may take a while because I will have to pass the changes through a proofreader first.
This post was edited by its author on .

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1494

>>1478

Thanks for the feedback! I really do appreciate you taking the time to point all of these out. Most of the issues you've found are the result of jumping into writing the story without much forethought and even less of a plan – though a number of those have become rather integral to my personal conception of it – or from running into the deadline of the contest I was writing it for and not being able to run it past a proofreader before making it public. As for why I didn't rectify the latter before submitting it to EQD... well, I don't really have anything to say in my defense.

You did make a number of points I want to respond to, but feel free to ignore the ones that are more questions of editing.

>You write a really thick accent for some of these characters, and it makes it to read.

I do usually follow "less is (much) more" when it comes to accents, but for whatever reason, this story wound up going very solidly in the opposite direction. I'll see what I can do to make them read more smoothly and clearly, but the use of dialect is one of those things that's wound up being a key part of Kin for me, and I am honestly not going to be removing it.

>But there are a couple ways in which you're being inconsistent with the limited narrator.

I was going for "close but impersonal" in the narration (which is why some areas were not using terms and speech patterns the characters would have), but I can see how it could feel like it was supposed to be more of a "third person from a character's internal perspective" in places rather than "omniscient but tightly focused around the character". I'll try to make the separation clearer. (Reading old responses in the thread, it sounds like that's mainly going to be keeping the narration from assuming the characters' experiences.)
Incidentally, the grazing scene was originally going to be from Zap Apple's perspective as well, but by the time my writing had reached that point, her personality had changed enough that I was having a lot of trouble keeping her in focus and in character while getting the feeling I was looking for. Eventually, trying to do justice to the scene seemed like a better choice than maintaining consistency in viewpoint, but it wasn't an offhanded decision.

>The more this paragraph goes on, the less it sounds like something Dash would actually say.

I can agree with that. I'll take another look at it, but having her sounding like the Rainbow we know while still allowing her to have matured since the show (I tried to hint at it having been over a decade ago) is a difficult balance.

>You should probably scan through for these, as it seems like the misspelling may be pervasive.

Oops! Seems like I need to add that to my dictionary rather than just visually checking them when the red line points them out. Really, though, I get that Pegasus was the winged horse's name rather than his species, but haven't we used it as the latter for long enough and widely enough now that spellcheck is just being unnecessarily pedantic?

>You go with so much unattributed dialogue and so little narration during conversations at times that it's hard to keep track of who's speaking.

Another casualty of the thick accents; I wound up relying on them to distinguish speakers (at least to my eyes) rather than including enough dialogue tags. The lack of narration is the result of being aware I usually imply too much accidentally, and deciding to see if a lot of deliberate implication was any easier to follow. Probably not my best idea.

>Cannot. You do this twice.

Yeah, "cannot" would certainly be one way to write that, but isn't "can not" technically correct as well, if less common? I was thinking it better reflected Truehooves's pronunciation (as I hear it) of that as two words.
Lose/loose is my mistake, though.

>I don't see a point to the story at all. Some events happen, but they don;t seem connected at all.

Definitely. I knew before I started that there wouldn't be much in the way of driving plot, and I didn't have any sort of overlying plan in mind as I wrote, so it wound up with even less of one than I thought it might. Personally, I feel plotless and ultimately pointless "a day in the life" isn't necessarily bad in slice of life stories (even if it is very tricky to pull off well), though pure SoL is admittedly not one of the genres I tend to search for to read. I do understand the concern of boring people, but at this point I'm willing to let this be restricted to a small niche interest, and if lack of direction winds up being the deal breaker for getting this onto EQD, I'm not going to stress about it.
That said, I have a much better appreciation of the importance of having a well-defined plan – with an identifiable arc – for anything I write in the future.

>Why did you go to present tense for this final scene?

Because it was supposed to be in past tense, and Rainbow's use of present for storytelling (legitimate) bled over into the narration (less so). I'll just go fix that now...

EDIT: Forgot to put this in the rewrite this after the tab closed the first time.
>Why does Strongheart speak so formally? She sure didn't in "Over a Barrel."
I wasn't going for formal, but given that one of the primary features I wrote her with was a lack of contractions, I can see why it might seem like that. Part of it was due to poorly remembering the episode and so filling the gaps with some of Henry Standing Bear's (from Longmire) speech patterns, but she does have a bit of a tendency to do that even in the right show:
>(around 11:50) The ponies refuse to move their trees, so we are stuck here and it is not fair!
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1495

>>1493
>Here's my first question. I tried to imply that a couple of decades have passed since they have seen each other, so Twilight had no idea that Celestia had switched mood. Did this not come across in the story? DO I need to make it explicit somewhere?
You could, though it's not like the story conceals this fact. You do say much time has gone by. But it's kind of glossed over that such long stretches of time go by between them seeing each other. Is this the norm, or is it unusual? And particularly with Celestia, Twilight later says she has something she really wants to tell Celestia regarding trying to create new ponies again. If she knew Celestia was trying to do this, why wait so long? What's more missing for me is her motivation for staying aloof so long, not the fact that she did it. And then all these things come to a head now, so that Luna and Twilight are just now hearing about years-old news from multiple topics, all at once.

>Right, I was trying to avoid this problem by interweaving the drinking with other actions, but I suppose that at a certain point we can implicitly consider that they continue to sip from their mugs without telling it.//

Yes, the reader will assume they continue to drink. But it's not that talking about this sort of thing is off limits. Just give it more variety. You had one of them poke at the foam on top of the glass, right? Little things like that. The notoriously common action authors use is "she took another sip." But there are lots of things they can do. Stare at the contents, run a hoof down the glass, swirl it around, etc.

>Comma splice aside (I fixed it) I'm not sure I understand. How would it be possible that in the sentence "Maybe with the world itself destroyed you would disappear" the "destroyed" could be associated with the "you"? I'm trying to read it in a such a way and I'm failing. Now, English is not my first language so maybe I'm missing something here, but if you could explain it to me I would be very grateful.//

There are c couple of things that come into play here. First, you're using "destroyed" as a participle (a verb that acts like an adjective), so it's already a non-standard usage. As a normal verb, "destroy" has to take a direct object. So a reader will often expect to see one, and latch onto the "you" that follows as that direct object. Let me copy part of that sentence to illustrate:
the world itself destroyed you
Yes, this interpretation doesn't parse when you add the "maybe with" on the front, so it's not that a reader can't figure it out. It's just that the mind makes that leap with a transitive verb to expect a noun or pronoun right after it to be a direct object, so it can cause a brief speed bump. If you left it how you originally had it, it wouldn't be wrong.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1496

>>1494
>the use of dialect is one of those things that's wound up being a key part of Kin for me
Dialect is fine, but it's more about phrasing and word choice that imitative spellings. You can mention how they sound, and the reader will apply it. This goes double for canon characters, since people already know what they sound like. You don't need to have Applejack say "fer," as an example, when the reader's already going to hear her accent, ever when you spell it "for." Part of why people can read quickly is because they recognize entire words and don't have to sound through each letter, which is obviously a slower process, but when you force them to do so, it becomes much more of a labor to get through it. Some is fine, but this is pretty extreme.

>Oops! Seems like I need to add that to my dictionary rather than just visually checking them when the red line points them out. Really, though, I get that Pegasus was the winged horse's name rather than his species, but haven't we used it as the latter for long enough and widely enough now that spellcheck is just being unnecessarily pedantic?//

Something like Google Docs, which takes its dictionary from what people commonly type actually doesn't complain about lower-case pegasus now. My issue wasn't with having it lower case or using that plural (which is canon anyway)—it was a misspelling of "pegusus" and "pegusi" for "pegasus" and "pegasi."

>Yeah, "cannot" would certainly be one way to write that, but isn't "can not" technically correct as well, if less common?//

It's not wrong, but it's really unusual. I only ever see it like this if someone wants to add emphasis to one of the words, but not the whole thing.

>The ponies refuse to move their trees, so we are stuck here and it is not fair!//

Fair enough. My memory of it may be colored by her youthful-sounding voice in the show, but if you're following how she worded things, then I can't fault it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1497

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>mannequin//

I believe they've used "ponyquin" in canon, but I'm not 100% certain of that.

>“Don’t be ridiculous Rainbow,” Rarity chided, “this isn’t necessarily a gift for Twilight!//

Missing a comma for direct address, and you're joining what are essentially two complete sentences of the quote by a comma, which forms one of the less-obvious kinds of comma splice.

>of course darling//

Direct address again. If one character calls another by name, title, or reference, it gets set off with a comma, and if it's in the middle of a sentence, it gets commas on both sides.

Compare this:
>Rarity exclaimed as she strode into the boutique, giggling with excitement.//
to this:
>With a heavy sigh, Rainbow Dash landed with limp wings and trudged her way inside the store behind her friend.//
The first one directly names her emotion as excitement (which was already indicated by the giggling anyway) The second one puts Rainbow's emotions on display without naming a single one of them. That's the more powerful way to do it.

>a familiar mare, a light brown pony//

Just pointing out the answer to a question you asked in the comments. But I don't know if it's right or not. I'm colorblind.

>I had no idea you worked at Gracie’s, why didn’t you tell me?//

Comma splice.

>Rarity’s eyes widened with surprise//

Another one of these where you directly name an emotion. When it's done in a prepositional phrase like this, often the sentence already gives the clues needed to figure it out. Her eyes widening already show me she's surprised.

>stand alone//

You're using the whole phrase as an adjective for "pieces," so hyphenate it.

>Rarity pursed her lips in thought.//

Whenever you use one of these phrases like "in/with/of emotion/mood," really think about whether the sentence already conveys that mood or emotion without the phrase. The vast majority of the time, it will.

>Oh, don’t fret my dear//

Direct address again.

>Rarity said as she took the gown from her, trotting over to one of the dressing rooms//

Note that participles mean things happen at the same time. So you have her taking the gown at the same time she trots to the dressing room, while it;s more reasonable that they'd happen one after the other.

>captivating contrast//

You've been good about this so far, but this is a slip. You're using an omniscient narrator, so the narrator needs to be careful about avoiding judgments or expressing opinions. The "captivating" here isn't a fact. It's the narrator expressing an opinion. Now, if you'd said "a contrast which captivated her audience" or some such, that's a fact.

>for what occasion you are purchasing this for//

Redundant use of "for."

>floor length//

Hyphenate.

>worth more than bits than my monthly salary//

Extraneous word.

>I’ve seen dozens of mares walk through the boutique’s doors and none of them could do that gown justice the way you do.//

>If you don’t buy that gown, somepony else will and trust me//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Coco asked//

But she didn't ask a question...

>You have such a generous spirit Coco//

Direct address. I'm going to stop marking these.

>I would say that went rather well, perhaps we didn’t get what we came for but at least we made one pony’s dream come true tonight.//

Comma splice, and another comma missing.

>the pegasus//

You're referring to them an awful lot by race or as "the mare." For a little flavor, these are fine once in a while, but you're really going overboard with them. There's a brief explanation in the section on "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome" at the top of this thread.

>I haven’t seen this much snow in a long time//

Missing your end punctuation. But really. It just started snowing, and she's never seen that much before? She's a weather pony, for goodness' sake.

>entered inside//

Redundant.

>Rarity lead the storekeeper//

The past tense is "led."

>T-this//

Think about what sound she'd actually repeat.

>foal hood//

foalhood

>Rainbow Dash threw a generous amount of bits onto the countertop.//

Presumably, fifty-three of them. I'm not sure how that qualifies as generous. It's not like she's leaving him a tip.

>slightly..//

Extraneous period.

>Confusing thoughts began to swirl about within the mare’s mind.//

That's incredibly vague. What kinds of thoughts?

>for awhile//

In this usage, you need "a while" to be two words.

>knitted//

In this sense of the word, the past tense is just "knit."

Aaaaaand they confess their feelings. Well, I have to say that this is the most common type of shipping story we get, and it has the most common problems with shipping stories, which is a shame, since the writing's pretty good. But you're doing the same thing that 95% of all MLP romance stories do, and that's not going to help you stand out from the crowd.

First, there's the cliched "Pony A confesses her secret love for Pony B, who conveniently has also secretly loved Pony A for some time." Then there's no basis for their love. You never demonstrate it. What do they like about each other? What makes them a good couple? Dash has been acting vaguel uncomfortable until now, but there's nothing in the story to suggest these two are in love, except that the narrator says it's so. You have to convince the reader. It's not enough to throw the happy couple together and ask the reader to invent the reasons why he should care. It takes some time to build up a believable relationship, and it takes the same care as developing a character.

>sitting on the other side AJ//

Missing word.

>scoffing down popcorn//

I'm guessing you meant "scarfing."

>The pegasus cheeks//

Missing possessive.

So what's my takeaway from the story? Nothing much changed. Rarity and Dash are dating now, but there hasn't been any character growth, and there was't any sort of conflict resolved. What interesting thing do we learn about the characters? That these two are in love, I guess, but it's never explored much, and more to the point, I don't know why they're in love. You probably could have made something about the snow globe. If Rainbow explains its significance to Twilight, there might be an opportunity to have some character development there, but as it is, there are just some events that happen here, and there's no meaning behind them. There are plenty of stories out there that just exist to get two ponies together as a couple. Really making that relationship come alive, presenting some sort of struggle and resolution, and making those characters grow are what distinguish the better stories from the pack.

"Frienship Lost..." fanfiction. Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1500

>>1482 Hey I am Dionysios Papagiannis otherwise known as nioniosbbbb/dionysiosbbbb author of the fanfiction "Friendship Lost..." that is posted in fimfiction https://www.fimfiction.net/story/292445/friendship-lost and in gdocs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1morGXZN4AxGBsmtMUEZIzto9ZY2_vyVE3H6QwGX-S8g/edit?usp=sharing

This is my first time responding to ponychan so be ready.
>>Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Ah well this is my first time and I am really not that good in grammar so if you can help point out stuff like that I would welcome it. I did tell my editor to relook it and I did look at it again once more after this.

I will adress your corrections in turn and by number.

1-2-3-4 fixed

5-6 Pretty much removed it because I felt it was wonky.

7-fixed, 8-fixed?,9-I think I fixed it? I am sorry I am Greek and as such it's kinda hard to get the syntax down.

10-I think I fixed it, 11-fixed, 12-I removed it because I couldn't fix it and added a new sentence/phrase where Chrysalis just speaks it.

13-Removed the first, changed the second eliminating the Twilight perspective.

14-Fixed, 15-Changed Hell to heck, 16-I think that's removed, 17-Fixed or removed I don't remember which, 18-Fixed or removed again don't remember which

19-Fixed, 20-I don't understand. How exactly does it have to happen? 21-Fixed 22-Fixed I think? and 23-Fixed

>>I'm unclear why Twilight says what she does at the beginning. It led me to believe she'd become disillusioned with friendship toward the end, especially since it sounds like she's summing it up after the fact. But then the story ends on a completely different note. I get the feeling you didn't mean for the beginning to sound like it takes place after the rest, but it may come across that way.


Ah yes indeed. She is dissapointed that her friendship, her ideals, they weren't enough by themselves to beat the enemy. She is in doubt of her own beliefs, especially when her own beliefs also were the weapon of the enemy.

By this I mean of course that since both changelings and ponies had champions of friendship in them then it's not clear who should have won that battle. Twilight Sparkle had, so far, faced challenges where pretty much things were black and white, and she never had to choose friendship over something else without the choice being clear. With the matter of the tickets in season 1 she had clinged to her ideal of friendship, and in the matter of Tirek she also did the same. In fact I think I indirectly reference the choice she had to do at that point, which realistically speaking... is stupid. Or at least that's my opinion.

My little pony has always been keen on Deus Ex Machinas, Rainbow powers, loveblasts, yada yada yada... However the loveblast at the wedding was something she didn't expect.

In this fanfic I chose to explore that initial desperation that filled Twilight once the elements of harmony were out of reach. I chose to explore the confusion and dissapointment of an idealist when the fairytale only by chance scratches the happy ending. Doubt fills her, and she needs to re-affirm her beliefs, or find out why they didn't work the way she had hoped for.

However there is the matter of hope.

Ideals cannot be entirely achieved, and that's not a bad thing. In the end Twilight Sparkle realizes that despite her idealism not having the desired result it did have some other result.

It's like... how can I say this? She wants friendship to win the day, but it didn't win the day by itself. She realises that friendship STILL contributed to victory. From Chrysalis she learns that friendship alone cannot contribute to victory but that doesn't mean it doesn't make the world better.

It's all about patience, waiting, because that's the main source of her dissapointment:her youthful nature. The same goes for Chrysalis. Chrysalis is tired of waiting and Twilight is experiencing the early symtoms of "being tired" from the lack of desired results.

In the end hope is the balsam that keeps them both going. That is the conclusion.

And yes the beggining is happening before Twilight visits Chrysalis.

>>I'm not clear on what Chrysalis says about killing her friends, either. They were corrupted by the nightmare beings, so she had to kill them? But she wasn't referring to the other changelings that attacked Canterlot with her? It sure sounds like she says she killed all them, too, but I don't know why she would have.


Allow me to say my inspiration for this. When the Turks besieged Messologi ((one of the cities of Greece-my country)) the inhabitants started starving. In a play I read there was a couple and the husband died. The play speaks of how in her frustration, sorrow, anger, and hunger the wife lunged on her dead husband's corpse and tried feast upon it. This SHOCKED me. Hunger by itself can take down all inhibitions and all notions of civility((am I using the right word?)) aside. Now a demonic infection, which the Nightmare Miasma is, with no cure to speak of would be lethal to a changeling that starves. Once hunger and instinct takes over there is absolutely no return from that.

Dunno think of it as some sort of rabis. Past one there's no return so they must die or they risk destroying everything around them.

I've kept the specifics of how the infection works ((the point where Twilight sees Chrysalis killing changeling abominations)) intently secret. For now at least. Why did I do it? Because I wanted you to absolutely DREAD this happening. I wanted you to FEAR the unknown malicious ways in which the infection works. Jumpscares cause surprise not fear, and an ugly monster causes disgust not fear, but the unknown... oh the unknown is something TRULY terrifying and that's something unavoidable.

>>Anyway, I've marked each type of problem I see, but only the first instance of each, so it's up to you to sweep the story for them. The only really pervasive ones are the sometimes too-blunt emotions instead of working by implication, and the constant shifts in narrative perspective. It might help to rad the section at the top of this thread on "head hopping."


I'll scour this once again and I'll get a second opinion on edits.
This post was edited by its author on .

New fic Changes Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1501

So I am trying my hand out at writing again. this the first chapter of my new work Called Changes. If someone would be able to take a look at it and give some feed back It would be heavily appreciated. Thank you so much for your time

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17I5sjjfJ6vgGX3WamAYF2JGvunzdWgCVIsl1R15eGzU/edit?usp=sharing

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1507

>>1500
>20-I don't understand. How exactly does it have to happen?
Just put a hyphen in there. the whole phrase is a single adjective.

The point about Twilight realizing that friendship alone isn't enough, since Chrysalis had friendship on her side as well, is a valid one, but I didn't understand that as going through her head. It's a subtle argument, but it's not one I feel the story clearly made. If she could state that more explicitly as a conclusion, it might help. Nobody understands a story as well as the author does, so it's easy to overestimate how much a reader can get from it. I'm certainly not the best around at reading between the lines, but if I missed it, others will too, and that's a rather large piece of the story's purpose to have the reader fail to see.

Likewise with Chrysalis having killed her friends because her hunger got out of control. I didn't get that from the story at all. It just felt to me like the worse her hunger got, the more incapable she'd be of having a civil discussion with Twilight, instead resorting to attacking her. I definitely didn't read the hunger as meaning she'd even turn on her own people.

If you can make those two things clearer, then the rest is details. Though note that particularly for item 11, that issue occurred throughout the story, not just the single instance I cited.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1510

>>1500
>>1507
By the way, I haven't read through the revisions. I can, if you want, but that means I can't be the one to review it when you resubmit, since I gave you outside help.

When you're ready to submit, just go through the submission form, the same as you did the first time.

Friendship Lost... Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1511

>>1507 Eeer not exactly. Every changeling that falls upon the taint's hunger and goes mad must die.

I will clarify what you said, and I scoured the emotions thing for the most part. Now I will resubmit it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1512

>it’s a way of life; something that helped me and my friends achieve harmony//
What comes after the semicolon couldn't stand as a complete sentence, so the semicolon isn't used correctly.

>elements//

Just do a Ctrl-f for these. You still go back and forth on whether you capitalize it.

>She could get the answer she wanted other ways, she didn’t have to come to the current public enemy number one to get it.//

Comma splice.

>but when the mages erected the warding spells//

Needs a comma after this to separate clauses.

>so it’s not fear//

Another clause that needs to be set off with a comma.

>as Twilight saw Chrysalis close her eyes//

Twilight's effectively the narrator. It's already implied that she can see anything the narrator describes. So you don't need to say Twilight saw it. You only need to have the narrator say what Chrysalis did, and it already means Twilight saw it. It's only worth pointing out that she saw something when it's worth the emphasis, like it's a detail most would miss, or everyone thinks Twilight's asleep, so the presumption is she can't see anything. Situations like that.

>Suuuuuch weeeeeeaknessssss.//

I assume this is inside Chrysalis's head. But you're telling the story from Twilight's perspective, so how does she know about this? If she doesn't know it, the narrator can't say it.

>THERE WILL BE A TIME TWILIGHT SPARKLE!” Shouted Chrysalis//

Needs a comma for direct address, and the dialogue tag is mistakenly capitalized.

>Twilight’s hoof was mid-air//

Usually phrased as "in" mid-air.

>But even when Discord attacked//

Needs a comma after this.

>The day of the wedding neither friendship, nor love//

Don't need that comma.

>but while I am sorry//

Needs a comma after this.

>day! ”//

Extraneous space.

>As Twilight turned around//

Needs a comma after this to separate the clauses. This happens whenever you have separate verbs for each subject. When multiple subjects share verbs or one subject performs multiple verbs, you usually don't use a comma. There's a short section on this at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

>still upon her face, Twilight could see it in her stance, her aura: she was still//

Watch that word repetition.

>self righteousness//

Hyphenate that.

>You’re too quick, too eager to draw conclusions Twilight Sparkle.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>She lifted one of her chains, and looked at the reflective surface of the metal.//

The same subject does both verbs, so you don't need the comma.

>Soon.//

Same as before. Does Chrysalis say this out loud? If not, how does Twilight as the narrator know about it?

>not knowing what to do//

Participial phrases get set off with a comma, just like you correctly did for the previous sentence.

>If ponies knew about this//

Needs a comma after this to separate clauses.

>they would hunt changelings to extinction, we would surely be isolated//

That comma is a splice.

>If changelings knew this//

Needs a comma.

>Feed.//

>Musssssssstttttt feeed.//
Jumping into Chrysalis's head again.

>‘How//

Extraneous quotation mark.

>She had ever seen Chrysalis cry//

Don't you mean never?

>the shadows of the guards that were obviously overhearing the conversation//

You repeat "the shadows of the guards" in consecutive sentences, and guards would be a "who," not a "that."

>Her horn glowed//

Needs comma here.

>a sign of her trying to bring back the memories from where she hid them//

That's over-explained. Just make her look thoughtful, and the reader will understand.

>She pleaded//

Capitalization.

>The time I decided//

This is awkwardly phased. What time are you talking about?

>you were screwed//

This is out of place in the very formal language this story uses, similar to the "spill the beans" phrasing earlier.

>If you had//

It's a bad idea to start talking to the reader this late in the story.

>if she walked away now//

Needs a comma after this.

>to not//

Reverse the order of these words.

>share this to others//

That's usually phrased as "with," not "to."

>if Chrysalis was sworn to secrecy//

Needs a comma after this, and the one before it is a splice.

>felt them seep into her body and then vanish. She opened her eyes, feeling//

More close repetition.

>Came Chrysalis’s voice//

Capitalization.

>But Princess Luna was cleansed of her evil self, then couldn’t you be as well?//

Seems like you're missing an "if."

>We have been living with this taint for over four thousand years, it has become part of our bodies.//

Comma splice.

>second greatest//

Hyphenate.

>Queried the ever-curious Twilight Sparkle//

As the limited narrator, it's odd for her to refer to herself that way. You also have a capitalization problem, and you're using an awful lot of unusual speaking verbs. You should also look as the section on saidisms at the top of this thread.

>modern day//

Hyphenate.

>as her mouth gaped as the realization hit her//

Very clunky to have two "as" clauses so close together, in the same sentence even.

>and once a changeling falls to the madness of starvation//

Needs a comma after this.

>She felt Twilight’s hoof touch her shoulder.//

Now you're in Chrysalis's perspective. Or did you mean to say that Twilight felt Chrysalis's hoof?

>You saw it//

Needs a comma here.

>The warriors whose families praised my name, and considered it a blessing to even be touched by me.//

No comma.

>This is what it led me to Twilight Sparkle//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>... true//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>If your friends are your strength. Twilight Sparkle, then what are you without them?//

Did you mean that period to be a comma?

>If the elements of harmony didn’t exist//

Needs a comma here.

>If you can give me a truthful answer about how your friends can currently help defeat someone like me//

Needs a comma here.

>It was true her friends had their strengths and weaknesses//

Needs a comma here.

>they never had been trained for combat//

>none of them were trained for war//
Pretty repetitive phrasing, especially coming in consecutive sentences.

>‘your’//

Quotes don't really add emphasis. If that's what you want, put it in italics.

>You say you admire friendship//

Needs a comma here.

>but you really don’t, you just admired Celestia//

Comma splice.

>then you Twilight Sparkle are a hypocrite//

Her name is being used as an appositive, so put commas on both sides of it.

>junkie//

Again, a decidedly informal word for the tone she's been taking throughout the story.

>Again and again and again I heard the sickening sound of my brethren’s last breaths//

Needs a comma here.

>There is no escape.//

In Chrysalis's head again.

>A hypocrite that doesn’t know when to admit defeat.//

Another spot that should be "who" instead of "that."

>uncared for during her days of imprisonment//

This throws into doubt a line you had way back at the beginning:
>When she entered the cell, the Queen’s expression didn’t change.
You hadn't mentioned Twilight in that second scene before this excerpt, so the "she" could only refer to Chrysalis. So this sounds like Chrysalis is only now being put in her cell, even though a few sentences before this, it sounds like she's already there. So I think you need to use "Twilight" instead of "she" there.

>I think I would be better if I succumbed to that fate myself//

I wonder it you meant that to say "I think it would be better."

>and time and after time//

Seems like something got jumbled there.

>There are still changelings that need me out there.

"Who," not "that."

>Chrysalis’s body shook as she felt herself getting constricted//

This paragraph and the next two are in Chrysalis's perspective.

>her mind flashed with the memories//

Capitalization.

>do you?//

Set this off with a comma.

>at a loss of words//

at a loss for words

>Your mistake lies in thinking that the end justifies the means, that is why you are here.//

Comma splice.

>Chrysalis” Twilight placed a hoof upon the changeling’s chest, “remember//

This is how to put a narrative aside in a quote:
Chrysalis—” Twilight placed a hoof upon the changeling’s chest “—remember

>But what she gave the queen was something more. Inside the absolute darkness of the queen’s heart something warm was felt. A smooth, kind light shone, burning away the darkness, silencing the evil whispers. This was beyond common love, or any other emotion, this was…//

In Chrysalis's perspective again.

>Do what you can little pony.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

So I decided to give you a full line-by-line listing of the mechanical fixes and do your editors' jobs for them, since they're still missing a lot of stuff.

The only big thing remaining is the shifts into Chrysalis's perspective. First, I'll say that you can go to her head if you want to, but you don't want to keep switching back and forth between them. So that's job one: don;t go to Chrysalis, only to spend the grand total of one sentence with her before heading back over to Twilight.

But this story is really about Twilight's experience. This is why I think it works much better to keep the entire thing in her perspective. So those bits of italicized voice in Chrysalis's head? Twilight can't hear those. I'd suggest you either make Chrysalis have some clear visible reaction to it, so that Twilight can see something's happening, even though she won't know exactly what, or make it so Chrysalis actually says those things out loud. She could hiss them, mutter them, whatever. And she could seem unuaware she's actually saying them out loud, or she could try to conceal them. It could work a lot of ways. But that's a good method for making it so Twilight could know about those. If you want to discuss your own ideas for making it work, that's fine, too.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1519

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>My hooves shaked//

shook

>made it felt like my heart had stopped//

feel

>But I had to save whomever made that cry.//

I appreciate the attempt, but "whoever" is actually correct here. It's the subject of a noun clause.

>dawning my best Royal Canterlot Voice//

donning

>thine teeth//

There are two times to use "thine": where "yours" would be appropriate or when the following word starts with a vowel. You want "thy" here.

>family, If//

>I Nestled//
Extraneous capitalization.

>My eyes began to grow heavy, and for the first time in days, genuinely smiled.//

This says her eyes smiled.

>Knock knock knock.//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration. Just describe the sound.

>Oh, uh, hello there sister!//

Needs a comma for direct address, and family words like "sister" get capitalized when used as terms of address. The capitalization issue turns up again later.

>Perfect!//

I think you meant to italicize the whole word.

>as I galloped down the stairs that lead to the royal bathing chambers//

The past tense is "led." You do this again later.

>and set the tiny colt onto my bed—He was a colt, I checked—.//

Don't use a dash in conjunction with a period, and it's not necessary to capitalize after the first dash.

>Do you have a name young one?//

An the lack of a comma for direct address pops up again, too. Scan for more of these. I'm not going to mark any more.

>But daddy always calls me Starry for short.//

Family members also get capitalized when you use them as names, like "Daddy" versus "my daddy."

>“Oh my!//

You've got this paragraph centered for some reason.

>who was poking his head above the side of the bed//

Need to set off this clause with a comma.

>began to battle with my sparkling blue locks. Soon after, I began//

Watch that repetition. And begin/start actions are rarely necessary. Any given action starts, so it's only worth calling attention to it when it's abrupt or the action gets interrupted.

>“What’s a Royal Guard?" He asked.//

Just because the quote didn't end with a comma doesn't change the capitalization rules for dialogue tags.

>I thought, maybe//

Capitalization.

>At first, I was shocked, but at the same time I was overcome with intense joy and a strange feeling of guilt.//

So put some of those emotions on display. When you just name them like this, it's a fact, not something that engages the reader.

>The pride I felt seeing how skilled he had become was indescribable.//

She could at least try...

>Royal Canterlot Voice

No reason to put that in italics.

>How could things get any worse!

Isn't that a question?

>pegasi city//

Noun adjuncts are singular: pegasus city.

>neither her nor Star Swirl were//

Pronoun case error, and "neither" refers to two singular items here, so it's also treated as singular: neither she nor Star Swirl was.

>I interrupted him.//

I can tell from the punctuation. This is redundant.

>snached//

Typo.

>it taunting//

Extraneous space.

>mama//

She's using it as a name substitute, so capitalize it.

>I shouted as royal as possible.//

Royally

Around now, I'll say that you use semicolons in speech quite a bit. They're fine for avoiding comma splices, but dashes and periods work fine, too, depending on the cadence you want. It's not that they're used incorrectly, but readers do pick up on things they don't normally see a lot of, and you want them remembering the dialogue, not the fact that they saw a lot of semicolons.

>gaffaw//

guffaw

>"Mommy!" He shouted//

Capitalization.

>For clarifications sake//

Missing apostrophe.

>"What, may I ask, was that!?" snapped the captain of Royal Guard.//

You'll normally italicize a question mark or exclamation mark that's on an italicized word. And as much as this guy turns up, he doesn't get a name?

>"You're not going to put on a show like that and expect me to keep quiet. My job is to ensure the safety of all, and if I feel like anypony is in danger, unidentified colts included, I need to know!"//

This kind of comes out of nowhere. I guess he doesn't respond to her authority like the rest of the guards because he's in charge of them, but that's still pretty bold of him to deft her like that, especially since he's apparently not close enough to her for her to know his name.

>story." I said//

Punctuation.

>he lay his hoof on mine and stared at me with his piercing dark blue eyes.//

Asides like this don't take a period at the end. Just leave end punctuation off, unless you happen to need an exclamation mark or question mark.

>"Okay," he agreed.//

He's awfully unaffected by the fact that this has been going on for three years. For that matter, the colt sure acted like it wasn't a huge rule for him to remain hidden. He's out running around in the hall and unafraid that he's doing something very wrong, yet he'd behaved himself for years. That seems inconsistent.

>maybe It//

Extraneous capitalization.

>"So, all I have to do is keep him busy while you're at work?"//

And nobody's going to notice that the captain is constantly absent?

>that is so much better//

Capitalization.

>what ever//

whatever

>a wave of emotion washing over the beaches of my mind//

That's awfully vague. It's not going to make the reader empathize with her.

You've got a lot of very short scenes here that just gloss over events by presenting them as a narrative summary after the fact instead of letting the reader witness them. It limits how real those scenes will feel, and it makes the pacing uneven.

>the duty of teaching Starry how to fly fell square on me//

squarely

>Now," I said turning to Midnight. "if//

Punctuation. And this conversation is awfully talking heads. There's an explanation of the term at the top of this thread. For that matter, also read the section on saidisms, as you're going a bit overboard around here.

>unforested, spot//

Why is that comma there?

>"Are we going to fly now, Mommy?" beamed Starry//

How in the world do you beam a sentence?

>"That," I said, smiling, "Is a sunset."//

Capitalization.

>Woah//

Why can't anyone spell this right? You get it wrong several times, but curiously, you get it right once.

>wanna to//

"Wanna" already means "want to."

>a strange purple aura//

Why would she describe her own aura as strange?

>shimmering strands, and a small sliver of white light began to appear above the horizon. Starry watched, mouth agape, as the silver moon flew up into the darkness, shimmering//

Watch repeating all but the most mundane of words in a close space like this.

>My horn then made a loud cracking noise//

You've started two straight sentences with this "then" structure. And you've also been using a number of "begin" and "start" actions lately, too.

>Starry was eight years old//

And the one guard is still the only one who knows about him? How does she sneak enough food away without anyone noticing? Who's serving as his school teacher? What happens when he's sick? Who cleans the room? The longer this goes on, the more implausible the logistics of it become.

>cake— as you can imagine, that did not go very well on the first try— but//

Don't leave spaces on either side of an em dash. And as who can imagine? You haven't written the story as if Luna had an audience so far, so it's inconsistent to have her address one now.

>I had forgotten that he had never had a real party in his entire life.//

Does she know that? He could speak by the time she found him, and he had some memory of his parents. He doesn't remember having any parties with them for any of their birthdays, Hearth's Warming, etc.?

>Alright//

This really seems like a authorial tic. You use the word as an intro a whole lot. If one character tended to, it might be attributable to characterization, but all your characters do it.

>royal guard//

That's a proper noun.

>Mister//

This wouldn't get capitalized unless it was attached to a name.

>Sometimes I knew when he's having//

"He's" can mean "he is" or "he has," but not "he was."

Curious that you made such a big point of Luna wanting to keep Celestia from finding out, but since then, you've dropped her from the story completely.

>moaned,his//

Missing space.

>Sometimes it drags you up from the pit of despair//

And you're addressing the reader again.

>My fork clinked as it knocked against the fine porcelain of my plate.//

You have three sentences in a row with identical "I did this as I did that" structures.

>no longer hungry//

Set this phrase off with a comma.

>"Celestia!" I shouted surprised.//

Set off the participle with a comma, and it's nice to finally see Celestia make an appearance.

>You disappeared for ages without a word//

Wait, Celestia's been gone for years? That's a pretty big thing to drop on the reader like this.

>the ones you're supposed to love no matter what//

So Luna's using contractions now?

This whole conflict between the sisters comes out of nowhere. Luna's flying into a rage, even though she hasn't been doing a slow burn all along. Though she's right in that it's hard to believe Celestia wouldn't tell her what was going on when she left, or communicate it to her somehow. It's coming to a head at just the right time to be convenient to the plot, and Luna hasn't seemed invested in the topic so far, so it doesn't have the build-up that lends it authenticity.

>deep resentment in his voice//

I'd say you need to set off this phrase with a comma, but it'd be better to demonstrate his resentment than just tell me it's there.

Chapter title: Part IV "Give Voice To Those That Have None."
You're talking about sentient creatures, so they'd be a "who," not a "that."

>I muttered still smiling.//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>Cloudsdale is the city of the pegasi and it's where all the weather in Equestria comes from.//

Needs a comma.

>muttered Starry//

Last time he got a dialogue tag, it was the same one.

>I said taken aback//

Needs a comma.

>Starry smiled trying to hold back the tears welling in his eyes.//

Needs a comma.

>found ways to find//

Repetitive. And this paragraph really seems to be in his perspective. It just states these things as fact instead of saying how Luna deduces them.

>beamed//

This is a really poor choice of speaking verb, since it doesn't actually involve any speaking.

>Seriously mom//

Capitalization and needs a comma for direct address.

>rubbing the sleep from my eyes//

Needs a comma.

>but, I never thought//

You got the comma on the wrong side of the conjunction.

>He trailed off.//

Yes, I can see that.

>As things began to clear up//

You don't want to start consecutive sentences with an "as" clause.

>wiping the sweat from his brow//

Another participle that needs a comma. I've marked plenty of them by now. You get the picture. The rest are up to you to find.

>"Honey, we are here. It is time to wake up."//

Why are you putting a paragraph break in the middle of a sentence?

>I looked over at Starry who was curled up next to me//

>Starry lifted his head and his ears perked up high.//
>and when he did his mouth dropped open//
Needs a comma.

>I may have forgot//

forgotten

>Starry however,//

If you're going to use a comma after that word, you need one before it, too.

>It was strange how those huge stone-like buildings and coliseums perched so daintily on each downy cloud.//

How many coliseums do they have? And why would it be strange to her? She's seen it before, right?

>once blurry//

Hyphenate.

>Be careful honey//

Comma for direct address.

>There they were; hundreds, maybe even thousands, of pegasi trotting along the streets and bolting across the sky.//

What comes after the semicolon couldn't stand as a complete sentence, so it's not used correctly.

>zapping//

This isn't a motion. Are you sure you weren't going for zigging and zagging?

>it is strange//

>it is so easy//
Capitalization.

>cried Starry, swinging around to see what was happening.//

You're tacking participles onto the ends of your speaking tags an awful lot lately. It's getting repetitive.

>They did not just stay, some of them even climbed into the chariot with me.//

Comma splice, and why doesn't she have guards with her to prevent just such a thing. That's pretty much their job.

>"Is it true that you're a lazy slob who can't do anything right?!"//

Where is this coming from? It doesn't feel at all authentic. You've never had anyone treat the princesses with disrespect, so springing it here seems way too convenient.

>And, you//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one is not.

>thank you sir//

Comma for direct address. I hope you get the picture on these, too, since I'm not going to take up any more space copying them out.

>I then dropped a substantial bag of bits at the stallion's hooves.//

And she just carries one of those around with her when she goes out?

>his peeled wide//

His what? Depending on your answer, this could be very grim.

>large amount of ponies//

"Amount" is for collective quantities. You want "number."

>it is awful//

Capitalization.

>without see anypony else//

Typo. And you're still doing that thing where you tack participles onto most of your speech tags.

>I—.//

Don't put a period after a dash.

>me.He//

Needs a space.

>important ritual! It is highly important//

Repetitive.

>He cut me off.//

Redundant with, you know, her getting cut off.

>Now if you just follow my squad and I//

Let me take out the "my squad and" to illustrate: Now if you just follow I. Not right, is it?

>it is//

I don't know what it is (heh) about that particular combo of words, but you consistently fail to capitalize it.

>What, in all Equestria is the meaning of this?//

And what in all Equestria is that comma doing there?

>"Luna," moaned Celestia, sounding her age, "Why//

Capitalization.

>it is//

Really?

>you are right//

At least it's not an "it is" this time.

>messy maned//

Hyphenate.

>else." replied Celestia//

Punctuation.

I'm halfway through part 4 now, and this chapter just has no many more editing problems than the previous ones, and many of them are pretty obvious. I don't need to go through the rest of the story just to keep finding more of the same, so I'm going to call it quits here. If you resubmit it in substantially better condition, then I'll read the rest of it and see if there are any plot or character problems in the parts I haven't gotten to yet.

"Friendship Lost..." Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1520

>>1512
Yea sorry about that. I'm just going to see if I can get some help on this extensively.

"Friendship Lost" edits Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1534

>>1512 I've decided to implement them as real speech. Chrysalis's voice changes to serpentine and she is visibly shown to be struggling with it and being in control most of the time. I'll edit some more but for the most part I've taken care of this.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1544

>>1534
One other point I meant to make but forgot to: Chrysalis is starting to become overwhelmed by the compulsion to feed, but then it goes away, and there's no obvious reason why. My guess is that once she starts talking about hope, it's that she could actually feed off Twilight's feelings of hope, and that's why she recovers from her hunger. If that's what you intended, you might want to make it clearer, and if it's not, then there should probably be some kind of explanation as to how her hunger passed.

Friendship Lost Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1547

>>1544
I have explicitly said in the end through the words of the Queen that she is being fed hope. Right at the point she explains what hope is.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1561

>Archer felt her brow furrow with concern.//
This is incredibly roundabout. You have a limited narrator in Archer's perspective, so he should have direct access to the kinds of mental images and physical sensations the feeling would cause. But instead he's immune to the feeling itself and reads it through her feeling her brow move, which makes it feel disconnected and involuntary.

>The filly felt a shiver pass from her hooves to her ears. No, if the ginger snaps were out then she needed to think of a better plan.//

The second sentence here is basically the narrator speaking Archer's thoughts for her. It takes a conversational tone, so it wants to latch onto a character. Yet the first sentence doesn't create the feel of being in Archer's head, because she wouldn't refer to herself as "the filly."

>if the ginger snaps were out then she needed to think of a better plan//

>She heard the front door close with a gentle click and her breath caught in her throat//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>pink, muted, sky//

None of those commas are needed.

>if she hung her head at just the right height//

Needs a comma here. Basically, when two separate subjects each get their own verb, you'll usually use a comma with the conjunction.

>Sorry, mom//

As terms of address, family relations get capitalized.

>curling, cinnamon, mane//

No commas here, either. It's far from a foolproof test, but if it sounds really awkward to revers the order of two adjectives, then you probably don't need a comma between them. And you never place a comma between the last one and what it modifies.

>But mom//

Capitalization.

>the start of term//

Missing word.

>They obviously liked each other, why else would Archer have felt it?//

Comma splice.

>as though it was something physical; to Archer, it felt as though//

Try to avoid close repetition like that.

>if anypony was at fault it was Cheerilee//

Needs a comma.

>Archer shuffled her hooves under her mother’s kind stare, and looked back out of the window again.//

Here's the opposite issue: Archer performs both actions, so this is all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>Harmony Hearts smiled, and poked her daughter with a wing.//

Another spot that doesn't need the comma.

>proud, stubborn, part//

The first comma actually works here, and it passes the test I mentioned, but you still shouldn't put a comma after the adjectives.

>Harmony Hearts had sat up, and was flexing her wings as she gazed out of the window. The expression on her face was of a pony who had heard some familiar noise in the distance, and was trying to work out its significance.//

Don't need these commas.

>Hearts and Hooves day//

"Day" would be capitalized, too.

Maybe it's just an issue with my browser, but the pictures at the scene breaks wouldn't load. Do you have broken links?

>The filly//

Another reference that breaks the feel of a limited narrator.

>her rain mac keeping her mostly dry, but doing very little little against the biting morning wind//

The syntax is off in the bit after the comma, and you have a repeated word

>warm, delightful looking, pastries//

>Rich, tantalising, aromas//
The second comma needs to die.

>she took the seat nearest the oven, and basked in its warmth//

Don't need that comma.

>The filly watched her friend//

And another out-of-place reference.

>on seeing Archer’s face fall//

You just had Pinkie's face fall a bit ago.

>She looked across at Pinkie’s blank expression, and waved her hooves in frustration.//

>She blinked away the light spots that threatened to blind her, and focused on the transaction in an attempt to distract herself from the potent sensation.//
Don't need that comma.

>bucket ice cold water//

Missing word.

>It worked a little too well though, they both ended up with super googly eyes for each other and nearly lost their jobs because of it.//

Comma splice.

>Archer scowled at the story, and took the attack on her family’s name out on the ingredients she had just placed in her bowl.//

Don't need that comma.

>She pulled some of the escaped dough from her mane. And her hair.//

Wait, what's the difference?

>aunt Heartfelt//

Family relations also get capitalized when attached to a name.

>large, worn, book//

Don't need either of those commas.

>rustic looking//

The whole phrase modifies the noun that comes after it, so hyphenate this.

>and as her eyes fell across the words//

Needs a comma here.

>The filly quailed from the hardness in her mother’s voice, but forced her head up to meet her gaze.//

No comma, and you're breaking that limited narrator feel again.

>now empty//

Hyphenate.

>the filly began to feel//

Another external reference.

>rose coloured//

Hyphenate.

>She felt thoroughly wretched, and desperately willed the floor to open up beneath her.//

No comma.

>Cupid’s//

That should just be a plural, not a possessive.

>That’s not the issue here and you darn well know it.//

Needs a comma.

>Harmony Hearts caught Cheerilee’s expression, and took a sheepish sip of her tea.//

No comma.

>And after your ridiculous stunt today I'm minded to agree with her."//

Starting here, you switch from fancy-style quotes to simple ones for a while. Make them consistent throughout the story.

>I thought you'd be happy, mom//

Capitalization.

>she couldn't tell which//

Why not? It's her emotion. Why wouldn't she know?

>‘cos//

Smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward. Just paste one in the right way.

>Pinkie giggled, and bounded across the kitchen//

No comma.

>Before Archer could reply//

Needs a comma here.

>A feeling of pride blossomed within her chest, momentarily overshadowing her frustration and, when she allowed herself to be honest, guilt//

You're not going to draw the reader into the character's situation by spoon-feeding him the emotions like this. You've been good about this so far. This is the first big slip I've noticed.

>‘cos//

Backward apostrophe.

>Cake’s business//

There's more than one Cake, yes?

>The filly glared at her.//

Another out-of-place use of "the filly."

>as are my Cupid ones I think//

Needs a comma in there.

>all I do is force ponies to be with the wrong pony, and annoy them in the process//

>comforting, sounds//
No comma.

>“No I don’t, silly,” Pinkie was laughing.//

That doesn't really parse as a speaking action.

>but before she could reply//

Needs a comma here.

>The filly nodded//

Another "the filly" reference.

>rough cut//

Hyphenate.

>Archer tried to quickly recall how Pinkie served customers, and fixed//

>uncomfortable, smile//
No comma.

>uh,” she looked around the bakery.//

You're trying to use a non-speaking action as a speech attribution.

>distant, laugh//

No comma.

>again, hearing again//

Watch the repetition.

>The filly had even heard of a few//

Another "the filly."

>the excitement she felt making her voice tremble//

Just have her voice tremble. The reader will figure out the excitement, and then you haven't clubbed him over the head with it.

>still-warm, caraway//

No comma.

>Cake’s//

You're using this as a plural, not a possessive.

>feeling her chest swell with pride//

Same thing you did early in the story. The narrator is Archer, so she should feel the immediate effects of the emotion, not by interpreting it from some disconnected action. Her chest swelling is fine. Her feeling her chest swell removes her part in making it happen.

>She trotted towards it and Archer followed//

Needs a comma.

>a horrified expression on her face//

You're doing that indirect thing again. First off, she can't even see her own face, so how can she describe her expression? And second, that's not what would clue her in to how she feels anyway. Do you have to look in a mirror to know you're happy? That's not how it works in your own head.

>Archer swallowed nervously, and moved behind Pinkie as her friend stepped up to the counter.//

No comma.

>Glancing up//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>confused look//

This part of the story is the emotional crux, yet you're bluntly feeding the reader a lot of them. This is really the part where you need to concentrate on getting the reader to see what's happening, and "confused look" doesn't conjure much of a visual, since the point of the visual is to get to the emotional conclusion, but you've short-circuited that. Show me how this looks.

>Pinkie studied the mare for a moment, before a wide grin spread across her face.//

I won't bother explaining, since it's in depth and involves a lot of conditionals and... suffice it to say this is one of the times it's better not to put a comma between clauses.

>in hospital//

Hm. Pinkie definitely doesn't speak British in the show. It's kind of odd to see her speak like this.

>he’s such an ass//

Given the number of donkeys around, is this like dropping the n-word?

>dejected//

She goes on to act dejected anyway, so why make all that redundant by explaining it up front?

>and when that happens//

Needs a comma here.

>They stopped at a table and Archer climbed up onto a seat to morosely watch Pinkie open the tub and offer her a spoon.//

Needs a comma.

>where it exploded into giddy excitement and pride//

Yeah, this is really the wrong point in the story to get telly. It's odd. You were good about it through most of the story, but here at the end, where it's important to keep an eye on that, you lost it.

>the filly leapt down from the seat//

Another "the filly."

>one hundred percent//

As used here, hyphenate that.

So there are only a couple of persistent problems here. First is comma usage, particularly that weird tendency you have to wedge one between a list of adjectives and what they modify. Fortunately, those are easy to fix, as I've pointed out pretty much every instance of every mechanical problem, so you don't really even have to think about those, though I do hope you'll learn from them to avoid making the same mistakes in the future.

The second issue is the telly language, where you outright name character emotions rather than get the reader to interpret them. As I said, this got worse toward the end of the story, which is both good and bad. By avoiding it early on, you make the beginning of the story better, which will hook the reader more. But it greatly reduces the effect of the story's climax where the reader's not going to feel the process of discovery with the character, since he doesn't have to figure anything out. The narrator tells him exactly how to feel about it. Fot the most part, just take a look around the scene with Meadow Flower for emotion adverbs. That's the biggest violator here, and there aren't all that many of them, so it shouldn't take long to do something about that, either.

Lastly, perspective. You're using a limited narrator in Archer's perspective, so you don't want to do things to break that feel. She essentially is the narrator herself, so the reader's going to take the narration as her thoughts. This means you want to avoid having the narrator say things that don't sound like her voice. And insofar as the perspective character is in Cheerilee's class, she has rather advanced word choice at times. I suppose it's possible Cheerilee teaches more than one class, though we haven't seen any in canon, so the default is going to be to assume Archer's the same age as the CMCs, unless you make an explicit reference to her being older. That was a minor thing, though. The main issue is where you have the narrator identify her obliquely, like "the filly," because it implies this is how she thinks about herself, which is just weird. Also related is the way you get at her emotions in ways that aren't internal, like having her describe her own facial expression, which she can't see anyway. She can note what her eyes or mouth do, for instance, as components of that expression. But for her to sum it up and draw a conclusion from the whole as an outside observer would see it breaks the narrative voice and can make the action feel unintentional. Luckily, both of those things are also easy to detect and fix, plus I've pointed out every instance of them. I just want you to understand why it doesn't work well.

So this was a very nice story. If you can tune up the detailed items, fix those uses of "the filly" and the few instances of a decidedly external emotional evaluation of Archer (which are all really quick tings to do), then take a stab at being more demonstrative about Archer's emotions at the story's climax, we'd be happy to post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1581

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>18//

It's preferred to spell out numbers that short, The exact cutoff is a gray area, but generally anything than takes three words or fewer would be spelled.

>With this, and her grandfather’s worsening condition, left little room for rest and relaxation.//

This doesn't quite parse.

>On paper, anything was possible, on paper, nothing ended.//

That middle comma is a splice.

I'm seeing a lot of "to be" verbs in the early going. They're inherently boring verbs, as the reader wants to see what happens, not what is. I'll see how common they are through the rest of the fic, but at the beginning, you want to snag the reader's interest, and having it feel stagnant isn't the way to do that. It's usually not very difficult to rephrase many of them as active verbs.

>Of course she knew//

This is a fairly subtle thing, but it forces an extra step between the reader and the characters that doesn't need to be there, given your choice of narrator. You're using a limited narrator who's essentially speaking as Megan herself, so it's already implicit that whatever the narrator says, Megan knows, sees, hears, hopes, wishes, etc. By stating these outright, you remove that closeness with the character. So you don't need to say she knew this. Just state it, and it's understood that she knows, and then you get a much more personal voice from the narrator. I'm not going to mark any more of these, but keep it in mind. It's a concept you sometimes see called "narrative filtering."

>changed her in wonderful and inevitable ways//

A couple of examples are worth far more than any number of generalities. Have her briefly discuss one or two, and it'll really come alive.

>been apart of//

Typo.

>she thought//

Likewise, you already have a vehicle to present Megan's thoughts through the limited narrator, so it's unusual that it would be advantageous to make them quotes (and quoted thoughts would need to be either italicized or put in quotation marks anyway). The only reason to do so would be if it was important for the reader to know the thought occurred verbatim, versus a general impression, or that there's a need to present it in a first-person voice.

>thought, then immediately berated herself for thinking such bitter thoughts//

Watch the close repetition like this. You have 3 uses of some form of "think" in the same sentence.

>her brother joined the Marine Corps//

Why are you presenting this like a bad thing? If it's because she misses him, that's fine, but say so. On its face, it isn't something tragic.

>lived in constant fear of sickness, or bombs//

I have no idea what's going on here. Where does she live? Why are these things that would reasonably occupy her? This is the kind of thing that deviates from a normal baseline of either canon Equestria or real life, so it bears some back story.

>she just stopped visiting her pony friends //

Seems like this is a self-inflicted problem. Without her acknowledging that, it makes her sound kind of whiny.

>less and less//

You reapeat this phrase in the same paragraph. Maybe you meant the repetition to be thematic, but it doesn't come across that way, and there are ways to implement it to achieve such an effect.

>no concept of war//

Well... they've had war in canon.

>Rescue from Midnight Castle.’//

Do you see this as a short story that was featured in an anthology or magazine? If so, this is fine. But if it's a full book, then the title would be underlined or (preferably) in italics.

>no use crying over rotten apples you never had in the first place//

As a quoted thought, "you" could work fine, but as a narrative thought (I already discussed why that might be a better choice for you), it can open a can of worms to address the reader.

>OK//

Spell it out as "okay."

>four letter//

You're using the whole phrase as a modifier for what follows it, so hyphenate this.

>I'm-,//

Use a proper dash for cutoffs and don't put a period or comma after one.

>she stopped suddenly//

That needs to be a separate sentence. There's no speaking verb, so it doesn't work as a speech attribution.

>good natured, forever smiling//

Likewise, both of those need to be hyphenated.

>He was pale, and lay with an unnatural stillness.//

Both verbs go with the same subject, so that's all one clause. You don't need the comma.

>she couldn't tell you//

Why is she telling me anything? This is a big break from the narrative voice you've been using.

>her brain uncomprehending//

Narrative voice again. She's essentially the narrator herself, so she's not going to be self-aware enough to know she's uncomprehending. She's just going to be at a loss, with her thoughts all jumbled. So make the narration sound like that. With this limited a narrator, it needs to reflect her mood.

>she was clutching at him, howling in despair and rage//

Two things here. First, I'll reiterate what I said in my previous comment. Make her sound like she's in despair and rage. Second, you want to avoid directly naming emotions like that as much as possible anyway. Think about how an actor gets you to believe his character is sad or happy or whatever. He doesn't say he is. He gets you to interpret it from his behavior and appearance. That's how we normally read each other anyway, so it feels more natural and engaging.

>situation. The responsibilities of the situation//

Watch the repetition. You also have an extraneous space in there.

>the siblings never liked each other//

Then why did it matter that he left to join the Marines? This is also just presented as a fact. Without demonstrating it, it will have little impact on the reader.

>shared love for their grandfather//

Missing end punctuation.

>The entrance to the other place, the other world.//

So she knew where it was and suspected it would still work? She was complaining so much about losing that part of her life, but it'd been entirely within her grasp all along? Why did she choose to ignore it? She just seems negligent here, and that's going to make her less sympathetic.

>Is had always been before?//

Typo, and why is that a question?

>The rage and grief//

Don't name these. Demonstrate them. Let the narrative itself carry the mood. Have her act accordingly. Have the narrative present her stream of consciousness, all jumbled and incoherent and emphatic. Make it sound like something she might say out loud if she were speaking to herself.

>The Last Unicorn//

Underline or italicize book titles.

>15th//

Write it out.

>Was she to old//

Typo.

>as she had forsaken it//

I'm not connecting with her. It's so vague why she forsook it.

>The it was time to deal with the body.//

Typo.

>But she had always been scared; scared that he wouldn't believe her.//

What comes after the semicolon couldn't stand as a complete sentence, so the semicolon isn't used properly.

>age old//

Hyphenate.

>If There's Anything I Can Do//

>He's In A Better Place Now//
These would do better in quotes and not capitalized.

>She didn't blame them, not really, the old man had always been a bit of an introvert.//

That second comma is a splice.

>Law and Order//

TV shows go in quotes.

>when you heard the same empty platitudes//

Addressing the reader again.

>It a moment//

Typo.

>and she hardly had any money saved up, all of her spare cash had gone towards Papa’s medicine//

Comma splice.

>and felt exhilarated//

The exclamations are a nice touch in making the narrative sound exhilarated, but instead of drawing the conclusion for the reader, focus on what physical sensations and mental images it causes. The reader can piece her emotion together.

>she relished it the mere fact//

Extraneous word.

>hick South America//

I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. If that's a legitimate phrasing, it's not one I've ever seen, and I think it'll go over most readers' heads.

>Then, to her surprise, she found that she was happy!//

You need to take me through this transformation more gradually. This is too abrupt, and it doesn't draw me into her thought process.

>metaphorical lungs//

This sounds far more like the author saying it than Megan.

>Lord Terac//

I'm unfamiliar with G1 villains. Is this Tirek? Did G1 spell it this way?

>Thank you so much Papa//

Needs a comma for direct address, and the comma after it is a splice.

>she her//

Extraneous word.

>She frowned, and started to sit up.//

You don't need that comma. It's all one clause.

>Megan was terrified.//

But the narration doesn't sound terrified. It sounds calm and factual, albeit with some imagery there, so it feels disconnected from her situation. This sounds a whole lot more like an omniscient narrator, but you're not using one.

>She was laying in clouds.//

Lay/lie confusion. These are tricky verbs to get right.

>that could not be right, sheets//

That comma would work much better as a dash.

>You gave us a right scare there, sugarcube, Twilight here wasn't sure that you would make it.//

That second comma is a splice.

>Megan opened her eyes, the light was blinding.//

Comma splice.

>Woah//

Probably 95% of the stories I encounter can't spell this right.

>Mah friend just went to pick up some supplies, she'll be back soon.//

Comma splice, and you really don't want to overwrite her accent. The reader knows what she sounds like.

>She look towards the voice//

Typo.

>headband//

I think you meant that "b" to be a space?

>The equine in front of her had an orange coat, and a blond mane.//

No comma.

>Just like-//

Use a dash. Alt+0151 produces one: —

Okay, that ending. There are a few issues.

First one may or may not actually be an issue. We've gotten a lot of suicide fics, and a lot of them have that as a way to get to Equestria. It's cliched, plus it glorifies suicide, and there have been some high-profile cases of that in this fandom, not to mention it's a demographic susceptible to emotional problems, so we have to be very careful about accepting anything that deals with suicide. Now, I know that's not what's happening here, but it still faces that touchy subject of death being a path to Equestria. That's not something I'd necessarily reject the story for, absent any other reason, so I'm not going to ask the other per-readers for a ruling on that for now.

You don't really draw any meaning from it, though. What message do you want the reader to get from this? It's nice that Megan found her way back from Equestria, but it's not entirely clear that she's dead or if she's really there. Maybe it was always in her mind. You barely mentioned her writings on the matter, even though your synopsis plays it up as something that will feature prominently. But in the end, what meaning does it give the story? We don't see any character growth from Megan. She doesn't change her attitude about anything from the beginning to the end. There's not really a conflict set up and resolved. She does have a struggle with regard to her grandfather, but that doesn't so much get resolved as just go away. There's also not a strong connection to her losing that last tie to Earth and giving it up for Equestria, and even if there was, that would stray even more uncomfortably toward that "death=ticket to Equestria" issue.

So, bottom line, there's a twist going on here, but the story doesn't make that much of a point, and what point it may be trying to make is one that'd be problematic for us to feature. I won't rule out the possibility, and the writing's actually good here. Besides the few facets of it I mentioned, you do have a good sense of a limited narrative voice, so I think you're capable of making something powerful out of this, and even if the story doesn't end up being a good match for our blog, I think you have the writing ability to do so with another story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1750

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The embers flickered at the hearth and iridescent flames licked the charred logs.//

You have two clauses here, so you normally want to put a comma between them. You would use a comma anyway if there were more than two subjects or verbs, but if one or two subjects are linked to all of the verbs, you don't use a comma, and if each subject gets its own verb, you'll often use one, though there are exceptions. You have distinct subject-verb pairs here: embers flickered... and... flames licked.

>A lavender alicorn sighed contently.//

It's generally discouraged to avoid such descriptors for your characters. We've even taken to naming it "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome," or "LUS," as it's prevalent enough in the fandom's writers. For the most part, names and pronouns should work just fine. Once in a while for flavor is fine, provided you don't have a limited narrator taking a character's voice (implying the character herself would use such descriptors), but in general, they're kind of obtrusive. They don't tell the reader anything he doesn't already know, for instance, though if they actually do, they can be useful. The only other time they work well are when you have a bunch of characters present so that names start to get repetitive and pronouns are ambiguous.

>was a personal of hers//

A personal what?

>Smiling, she took a gentle sip from her china mug, relishing the sweet warmth of the hot coco.//

We're at the end of the third paragraph, and this is the first sentence that doesn't start with the subject. You might want to vary your sentence beginnings a little more for variety, but don't go overboard. The simple sentence will still often be your go-to construct, but you don't want more than a few in a row without something to break it up.

>to herself//

Authors like to use this phrase, but it really is redundant. If she were speaking out loud, then it does add some meaning, but as nobody else is psychic, thoughts are always to oneself.

>the princess just had to get away from it all, and have some alone time.//

Here's an example of a spot where you don't need the comma. The princess performs both of these verbs. Though we do give leeway in situations where the author feels like it creates a desirable rhythm. You want those to be the exception, though, not the rule.

>So.....pretty//

An ellipsis is just three dots, and leave a space after one, unless it begins the sentence.

>She was filled again with that foalish awe//

So demonstrate this a bit. Make it more than a cold fact. What sort of images or memories go through her mind? What sensations might it cause?

>running a hoof through her bedraggled mane//

This is the kind of thing I warned about earlier when I said not to go overboard in trying to vary your sentence beginnings. Certain structural elements get noticeable when you use them a lot, particularly ones that don't frequently appear in everyday speech. So you're using a lot of participial phrases so far, and a few absolute phrases as well, which are another type of participial structure. I'm still on the first screen, and you already have 5 participial phrases and 2 absolute phrases. These two elements are ones that authors who are just starting to mature in their craft often overuse, because they're unusual and very descriptive, so they can make writing sound more sophisticated, but as I've said, they can also stick out easily and make your writing sound repetitive when you use too many. Participles in particular have a few attendant problems that you're likely to run into if you use them a lot.

>Maybe they were sitting by the fire too, listening to stories, reading books, laughing, and spending time with their family.//

They all have the same family?

>on a shopping trip//

You've described the weather as quite bad. Rarity would really venture out in that?

>The beautiful white unicorn had begrudgingly allowed the smitten drake//

There you go with the LUS again.

>and give Twilight some peace and quiet//

You don't need the comma before this, and why did Rarity agree to this? We haven't seen a reason why Twilight wanted to be alone, so this sure feels like a loose end.

>Maybe....maybe//

Problem with the ellipsis again. Once I've pointed out the same thing a couple of times, I trust the author gets the picture, and I don't mark any more of them. So on a lot of these things, it'll be up to you to sweep the rest of the story.

But another thing about this. Until now, your narrator has sounded decidedly omniscient, but this is the kind of thing that belongs in a limited narration, where the narrator assumes a character's voice, speaks her thoughts for her, and takes a conversational tone. An ellipsis is a speech affectation, and this sentence is the narrator speaking as Twilight. You'll want to keep the narrative voice consistent through the story, especially for how short it is.

So you could take a limited narrator. If that's what you want, then establish that early on. Those times you presented Twilight's thoughts as quoted material in italics? Instead, have the narrator express those thoughts for her as narration instead of quotes. Have the narration itself sound close to dialogue, taking on Twilight's personality, as the monologue that runs through her head. And really, really watch the LUS, since it would mean that she thinks about the other characters (and herself, for that matter), in those terms.

Or you could go omniscient, which is mostly what you already have. But you need to purge the narration of things that sound like conversation and avoid having the narrator express opinions or voice Twilight's thoughts as anything but quotes or direct citation that she's the one who thought it. An omniscient narrator should present only facts (well, there are exceptions, but that's beyond the scope of this story), so anything that's subjective or opinion needs to be attributed to a character.

>The warmth of the fire against her chest was perfect, the crackling a lulling tune, and her spot of light in the darkness; a sanctuary.//

That semicolon needs to be a comma.

>Twilight allowed herself to push the book away, and curled up beneath her blankets to let the flames warm her face.//

If you decide to use a limited narrator, there's a subtle effect here that would work better if you rephrased, but it won't be necessary if you go omniscient. For a limited narrator, it's not usually a good idea to spell out a character's motivations or intentions, so instead of explaining why she does this (to let the flames warm her face), focus more on the mental processes and sensations that narrator can say for her that create the same attitude, like if she turns this way, the warmth feels good on her face, or some such.

>in relaxation//

It's a good idea to avoid these types of prepositional phrases that directly identify a mood or emotion. They're almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence, since there will be some kind of action or noun they follow that already connotes the same thing. Letting the reader have the space to work out the conclusion on his own is a much more engaging way to write.

>Knock knock//

It's preferred not to place sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

>sleep-induced panic//

Well, no, the sleep didn't induce the panic.

>Gone was the golden, blissful feeling of peace, replaced by unease.//

Just naming emotions like this doesn't do anything to paint a picture for the reader, and visual imagery is what brings it alive. Make her act and look uneasy. Think about how an actor gets you to believe his character is sad. He doesn't use the word. This is naturally how we read each other's feelings anyway, so it feels more lifelike and authentic when the reader has to interpret a written character the same way.

>Every since//

Typo.

>to not//

Reverse the order of those.

>Oh, she had almost forgotten the thing that had awakened her in the first place!//

>Whoever was there surely had a good reason, right?//
Here. you're definitely using a conversational tone. You need to decide whether you want an omniscient or limited narrator, and keep it consistent.

>the-//

Please use a proper dash.

>red nosed//

When you're using a multi-word phrase as a single descriptor and it precedes what it describes, hyphenate it. You get it right a bit later with "straight-haired."

>Twilight noticed with a flicker of alarm, that small threads of grey were woven into her mane.//

There's no reason to have a comma there.

>But, why are you here so late, during a blizzard//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't. And if Twilight's so incredulous about Pinkie being out in this storm, then why is she so ho-hum about Spike and Rarity going shopping in it? And why is there even anywhere open to shop?

>an twisted//

Typo.

>the older mare//

It's unclear who you mean. I certainly don't remember which one of them is older, if canon has even said, and it's quite a risky bet to bet your reader's understanding on his ability to dredge that kind of detail up.

>twisted grimace on her muzzle, and her ears falling flat//

You don't need a comma to separate parts of a compound participle.

>she quickly sat back besides the fire//

Capitalization. That's not a speaking attribution, so it needs to be a new sentence.

>high-pitched tone much lower//

Huh? That sound contradictory. Maybe you meant quieter?

>a look of bewildered upon her face//

Typo. And besides being another too-blunt declaration of character emotion, this is also the kind you have to be wary of if you decide to use a limited narrator, since it would require Twilight to be able to see her own facial expression.

>gave my shudders snd woozy sensations//

I think you meant "me."

>The older mare//

Besides being LUS, you're just using this so much that it's getting repetitive.

>If if//

Repeated word.

>navy bangs//

Don't get too cute with the colors. That one's not even accurate.

>"You're 67//

There's no reason to have a line break here, and it's preferred to spell out numbers that short.

>Gem and Pearl, as you know. So do all the other girls, of course.//

You have Pinkie speaking so formally in this story that it doesn't sound like her. Even when she's not happy, there are still characteristic speech patterns she follows, and her personality comes through. She's not very recognizable here.

>Please." Pinkie pleaded//

That's a tad redundant, but it looks like you wanted to have this as a speech tag, though it's not punctuated as one.

>as your pass through the fragile parts of life//

>and but down on her lip//
Typo.

>But to everyone around you, you're staying the same, Twilight.//

Think about how often you actually use direct address in a real conversation. You have it a lot here. Sometimes it's fine for emphasis, but a lot of times, it's just to clear up who is speaking to whom, and you only have two characters present, so there's no purpose there.

>lay there are cry//

Lay/lie confusion and a typo.

>keep their minds of the hardest thing//

Typo.

>small table besides the couch//

"Besides" doesn't mean the same thing as "beside."

>it has been a joy seeing you happy//

Yet she started the whole conversation by implying that she thought Twilight wasn't actually happy, and that all their other friends had been worrying about it.

>Twilight stood up shakily, and crawled across the floor//

If she stood up, why is she crawling?

>Laying about a bed//

Lay/lie confusion again. They're tricky verbs to get right.

>She flipped it open on it's hinge//

Its/it's confusion.

>I love you like the sister I never had//

But... she has three sisters.

>I don't have much time left, but I will be overjoyed to have spent them with you.//

What does "them" refer to?

>if theres one thing//

Missing an apostrophe.

>she was shaking so bad//

badly

>Ok//

Write it out as "okay."

>back in it's hatch//

Its/it's confusion again. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>Her legs wouldn't support her from the deep pit that used to be her stomach//

This makes it sound like her legs are in the pit and supporting her from it.

>who just happened to wings upon her back//

Missing word.

>20//

Spell it out.

>Yet, Pinkie wasn't gone//

No reason for a comma to be there.

I'm not sure what the point of this was. Twilight laughs like Pinkie wanted her to, but it wasn't implied that Twilight had a problem with not laughing in her life. If she really never laughed, I don't think the rest of the girls would have let it go for 50 years or so without saying anything. But you clearly meant for there to be some kind of chronic thing, what with Pinkie saying the others had been worried. So it's like Pinkie is staging an intervention about something, but it's just so vague as to what. And Pinkie acts like she's never going to see Twilight again, yet she also says it's not like she's going to drop dead the instant she leaves. So why the dramatic exit? From Pinkie's standpoint, I don't see what purpose it serves. And if Twilight actually feels like she needs to be with Pinkie right now, nothing's preventing her.

I'm just not sure what the conflict was in the first place, so it's hard to attach any stakes to it, and that's how you get reader buy-in. So think of it in these terms, and make sure it gets communicated clearly to the reader: What is it that's gone wrong? Why are they just now dealing with it? Why is Pinkie the only one who comes forward? How do they fix it? What bad thing happens if they fail?

I keep some common topics at the top of this thread for reference. I've already discussed a few of them, but have a look at the ones on Lavender unicorn Syndrome, dash usage, comma use with conjunctions, and show versus tell.

Bottom line, though—this shows a lot of promise. You're better on the mechanics than most stories we get, you do a good job with imagery when you want to, you avoid going over the top to make the story maudlin to the point of being laughable. I don't see writing this good from the majority submitted to us, much less thirteen-year-olds. The issues with demonstrating emotions, keeping to perspective, and maintaining a consistent narrative voice are the next step that authors starting to gain experience go through, so if you have questions, please ask. I'd like to help you take your writing to the next level.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1772

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

To illustrate a point, I'm going to break down the sentence structures over your first couple paragraphs.

1. Main clause, participial phrase, participial phrase.
2. Main clause, absolute phrase, absolute phrase, participial phrase.
3. Main clause, absolute phrase, absolute phrase.
4. Main clause, absolute phrase.
5. Main clause, absolute phrase.
6. Main clause, dependent clause.
7. Main clause, absolute phrase.
8. Main clause, participial phrase, absolute phrase

9. Main clause, absolute phrase.
10. Main clause.
11. Main clause.

12. Main clause, participial phrase.
13. Main clause.
14. Main clause.
15. Absolute phrase, dependent clause, main clause.
16. Main clause, absolute phrase.

So there's a lot of repetition going on. To a degree, that looks worse than it is, since the main clause doesn't always start with the subject. Though it still does a lot. 11 of those 15 sentences that open with the main clause also start with the subject. And absolute phrases are another type of participial structure, so you have 16 of those in 16 sentences. You don't want to get in a structural rut like that, since it starts to make your story feel like reading a list. I understand the appeal of participial and absolute phrases, as they're very descriptive and can evoke nice imagery, but they're also uncommon in everyday language, so they stand out more easily. Authors of moderate experience start to latch onto them as a means of putting more variety in their writing, but ironically, they may well end up with less variety by overusing them.

>trees, rattling the few withered leaves that still clutch onto their trees//

Word-level repetition is a thing, too. You don't want to use one again in so close a space unless you're going for a deliberate effect and do so in such a way that it's clear to the reader.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

I'll grab another series of excerpts to illustrate something.
>in an attempt to warm up from playing outside all day//
This is in Apple Bloom's perspective. It could possibly be omniscient, since it's staed rather factually, but we'll see how it plays out.
>her worry evident//
Now you don't have an omniscient feel. Evident to whom? The only logical candidate is Applejack, since Apple Bloom wouldn't make such a judgment about herself.
>Applejack being that quiet, even after a hard day of work, was unusual.//
In the very next sentence of the very same paragraph, this is coming more from Apple Bloom's point of view.
>That was far from the truth though. The arduous labor was only a straw in the hay bale of stresses on her body and mind. Truth being told, even if the work was hard, it was at least something to take her mind off of what was really tearing at her.//
Next paragraph, and the narrator's stating Applejack's thoughts now.

Even if you want to use an omniscient narrator, you still shouldn't jerk the viewpoint back and forth that suddenly and frequently, particularly not in the middle of a paragraph. It seems like you're using a limited narrator, though. I'll see how consistent that is as I get further in, but for a limited narrator, it's even more important to keep the narrator's perspective stable.

>a concerned look coming onto her face//

> her worry evident//
>her brow lowering to a confounded expression//
Here are a few examples of where you declare a character's emotion outright. It's better to imply these things, because it makes the reader figure them out, which gets him to think about your characters more and identify with them. Plus it's a more natural process to use visual and behavioral cues to draw conclusions about other people anyway, so it makes your characters more lifelike to do so. Consider how an actor gets you to believe his character is sad. He doesn't come out and say it. He looks and acts sad so that you'll draw the conclusion on your own. You mostly want written characters to do the same.

Now on to more detailed items.

>Her sister laid there//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to get right. This is also an example of how you waver between past ad present tense at times. You don't seem to be that comfortable writing in present tense.

>She says lowly//

Typo and capitalization.

>‘ave//

Note that smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward.

>Her hoof finds its way under her blanket, briefly probing before she pulls her hoof out//

Another example of repetitive word use.

>set backs//

setbacks

>unbeknownst to Applejack//

If you do want a limited narrator, then the narration has to be restricted to things the perspective character can know or perceive. Applejack's the only one there, so she's the only option for the perspective character. And if Applejack doesn't know this, the narrator can't say it.

>No Answer.//

Around here, your paragraph formatting goes haywire.

>Big Mac and Granny Smith having gone into town earlier that day in search of presents//

That's a really obtrusive way of working exposition into the story.

>how could she have missed it?//

Taking a conversational tone like this is very characteristic of a limited narrator. You really need to decide what kind of narrator you want, they work within the confines of your choice.

>a unexpected idea//

Typo.

>Applebloom knowing where she is heading first thing in the morning//

In a limited narration, you generally want to avoid pointing out things that are implied anyway. Just by the fact of the narrator saying something, it's already understood that the perspective character knows, sees, wants, hears, wishes, etc. whatever it is. By explicitly pointing it out, it tends to force another step of separation between the reader and character.

>Next to it, small calendar; todays date circled with ‘Hearth’s Warming Eve!’ in the middle.//

When you use a semicolon properly, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, Here, neither one could.

>Granny smith//

Capitalization.

At this point, I'll also say that you don't want to write thick accents for these characters. Some here and there is fine, but it;s more about word choice and phrasing. The reader already knows how they sound, and even if it were an OC, you only need to describe their speech once for the reader to get it. You don't want to make it a caricature or difficult to read.

>Spike turned to face Applebloom, who sat in the seat neighboring him, “want me to go ahead and read it back to you?//

Capitalization, and you're trying to use a non-speaking action as a speech attribution.

>lil’//

li’l

>“ Ah//

Extraneous space.

>H-How//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>lenient smile//

That's a really odd word choice. I don't see how it fits. Applejack hasn't done anything wrong.

Luna's speech is pretty inconsistent. It keeps mixing modern and archaic.

>don’t head my word//

Typo.

>trying to keep kept//

I have no idea what you were ttrying to say.

>left…!//

That's some pretty incompatible punctuation.

>Her voice trailed off.//

That's pretty redundant, since you used an ellipsis.

You have a nice enough scene going on, but it didn't really go anywhere. Apple Bloom wants to do this nice thing for Applejack, but what did Applejack get out of it? It's not clear there was any benefit. And we don't get to see a resolution on Apple Bloom's side, either, where she gets to see the results of her efforts. You generally want a story to accomplish one or both of these things: set up and resolve a conflict or show some character growth. Neither happened. Apple Bloom did somewhat perceive that Applejack was having some difficulty, but we don't know if her solution actually made anything better. And there's nothing new developed about either one of their personalities. What is it that you want the reader to take away from the story? What is different about the world or the characters because these events happened? You want to be able to point at a "before" and "after" picture and show that something fundamental has changed over the course of the story. Without that, it's more of a scene that doesn't carry a message.

Now, I'm getting into some fairly advanced things here, so I do want to step back and say that the word crafting is pretty good through most of this, and it's a surprisingly good effort for a first fanfic. Keep practicing at it. You do have a talent for writing.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1778

>earl grey//
Capitalize.

>just…" she searched her mind for the words. "...blend//

Here's how to put an aside in a quote:
just—" she searched her mind for the words "—blend

>presumably headed for the kitchen//

You had an omniscient feel until this. But this sentence is clearly from some character's viewpoint, most likely Twilight's. So it's odd that after Raven leaves the room, you have the action continue for another two paragraphs, then pop over to where Raven's gone. If you want the camera to stay with her, it should leave when she does. And then I'd also recommend removing that "presumably" phrase, since that breaks the omniscient narration. Or if you do want a limited narrator, choose who your perspective character is, since you play things from both Raven's and Twilight's viewpoints, and keep up the limited feel from the outset.

>a grim expression on her face//

By now, you're using a more limited narration in the story, but this means that Raven sees her own expression to be able to evaluate it as such. She likely wouldn't, and that's a very roundabout way to get at her emotions anyway.

>for a moment Raven//

>For a moment, Raven//
Watch that close repetition.

>thou last saw//

sawest

>I'll be just upstairs, sister.//

As a term of address, that would be capitalized.

>Thou stayed//

stayedst or alternatively staydst

>Celestia answered Raven's smile with her own, still looking towards the sun; a more genuine smile than Raven had seen in a very long time. //

You don't have an independent clause anywhere after that semicolon.

>sporting an incredulous look//

Why is she (as the limited narrator) evaluating her own expression?

Okay, either you're not presenting these events in chronological order, or I'm completely missing what Part 2 is supposed to be about. It sounds like Luna's return from exile, yet Part 3 takes place before that. I'm confused.

>Raven's magic stayed firm. Not a drop of tea was spilled.//

But she has no reaction to it at all? Not even internally? The limited narrator would show it if she did, but this is all very calmly worded.

>Raven's tone was unwaveringly professional.//

Now that seems to be from Celestia's viewpoint.

>Princess, do not waste the advantage you have gained in your banishments: Preparation.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>There still remain over a hundred years until she returns.//

So does this take place before all of the chapters so far? If you're doing the "backwards in time" thing, it could stand to be a little more explicit what's happening in Part 2.

>who must themselves be a being of extraordinary will; typically another alicorn//

Another misused semicolon.

large, rectangular room between large//
Watch that repetition.

>thou can//

canst

Over the last few chapters, you've taken on a more omniscient tone. I wonder if the archaic language has something to do with that. If one of them speaks that way, and she's the limited narrator, then the narrator should use such language as well. Though that could get tiresome to read, so it's one inconsistency in narrative voice that most readers will readily overlook.

>thou decreed//

decreedest, decreedst, or decreed'st

>newly-opened//

Two-word phrases beginning in an -ly adverb are exceptions to hyphenation.

>were thou//

wert or wast

>thou did//

didst

>thou walked//

walkedest, walkedst, or walked'st

>be... " She adopted a soft smile. "...welcome//

See my earlier note about how to format narrative asides in quotes.

>thou said//

saidst

>grit her teeth//

In past tense, "gritted."

>in the morrow//

Usually "on" the morrow.

>I promise thou//

thee

>thou like//

likest or lik'st

>thou hast//

Since she's not currently asleep, hadst.

>Raven looked at her with a curious expression//

Within the last two chapters, you've definitely gone back to have a more limited feel to the narration, where the narrator expresses Raven's thoughts as if his own. I think you could stand to do so more consistently through the middle chapters to keep that feel going throughout the story.

>Would thou likest//

The auxiliary verb takes the ending: wouldst thou like.

>brightly smiling//

It's unclear which one of them is smiling.

>have thou//

hast

>your employ//

thine

>you have//

Are you trying to you/thou as formal/informal? If so, then disregard my previous comment and any more that crop up suggesting you change it, but just be aware that the "common wisdom" about the difference makes a bigger deal out of it than it really is. Such a differentiation was only common for a couple of centuries.

>Raven was taken aback, speechless.//

Keep in mind that she's essentially the narrator. So if she's speechless, how is she able to say she's speechless? Let the narration display her mood. Since you've largely chosen a limited narrator, play to its strengths. Have the narrator ask the questions Raven is thinking. Have the narrator getting flustered for words.

>a tear escaping regardless//

Keep in mind that the single tear is very cliched.

>I need thou//

thee

>of thou, is for thou//

Both should be thee.

>thou can//

canst

>until thy return//

Well, Raven's not making a you/thou distinction here.

>She trailed off.//

The ellipsis already tells me so.

>thou hath//

hast

>thou said//

saidst

>trying to ascertain just where Celestia had gotten to in that morning's business//

This is another spot where a more conversational narrative tone (like her asking an appropriate question) would do better than spelling out her intent so factually.

>would thou//

wouldst

>Thou shalt see it near the end.//

Sounds rather more like a command than an explanation.

>your majesties//

The honorific would be capitalized.

>She waved the red booklet in the air, then opened it. She cleared her throat, then paused.//

See the repeated structure, even with some of the same words?

The reverse order works fine now, though there are two things I'll say about it. I'll reiterate that it could be made clearer when Part 2 takes place, since it's critical that the reader pick up on that gimmick quickly, or he'll be confused for the next several chapters as well. And second, it really mutes what sort of conclusion the story has. Had you added a last chapter that jumped back to the present, it would be a lot easier to put the story's real emotional punch there. As it is, you're relying on the reader remembering the one fact that Raven's hair was turning gray. Problem is, even if the reader does remember that, he's not going to remember the details of it. In my case, I had to turn back to chapter 1 to see how it played out again, now that I know why I should be paying attention to it. It's easy to gloss over characters' emotional responses at unimportant moments, but when they turn out to be important after all, the reader may have already missed it. And since I did go back and look, I have to say I think you really undersold it.

So continuing my pattern of twos, here's why I think that. Her reaction to it is so understated that I had no reason to take note. I did remember that she'd shown some signs of aging, but that was all, just this vague impression. It'd help if the characters made a bigger deal out of it, particularly Raven herself. That way, it sticks in the mind much better, and the reader's wondering what all the fuss is about, and about halfway through the story, they pick up on what. There's this thing that they've been carrying all along that's paying off, versus something they forgot about, only have a nebulous idea about anymore, and now have to try and remember.

The second is again about her having such an understated reaction to it, but what else that does is keep the story from making a strong point. We only get the barest hint of emotion from Raven about how it'll all conclude. This story hinges on characters having a stake in what's happening and getting a payoff from it. It's not clear what Raven has on either of those fronts. She makes the promise, but it's not apparent whether she earnestly wants to fulfill it or is just giving in to Luna's pleas. It's not clear whether she takes great satisfaction in fulfilling the promise because she loves either princess, or just because she's obligated to. Through all of these past events, there were opportunities for the limited narration to express great affection for Celestia, but keeping emotion mostly out of it, she comes across as more duty-bound. And that can lead to the kind of ambiguity over whether she's happy at the end because she's glad the princesses are on track now, or just because she has dispassionate satisfaction in seeing any job well done. Or that she got roped into making a promise she didn't understand, and now she's just glad it's over.

In fact, take your own wording of the spell: It is said that under certain circumstances, if an alicorn with pure intent and love in their heart asks a promise of another being—and the being accepts—the universe will reshape to allow that promise to be fulfilled. This speaks of the passion of the one asking for the promise (Luna), not the one agreeing to it (Raven). So it doesn't say anything about her that she took this on, not by default, anyway.

So: what are her stakes in this? What does it mean to her to fulfill this promise? What is her investment in it, and thus the reader's? That's the kind of thing to build up in these past scenes. Show me that she's so devoted that she wants to see this promise through, for their sake, not hers. And then with stakes come consequences. Show me that she's overjoyed and seeing it through to the end, not just slightly amused. For all I know, she's just taking an academic interest in the fact that it all worked out as the legend says it would, and nothing more. Maybe that means a present-day chapter at the end, or maybe it means playing up her reaction in chapter 1 so it burns into the reader's mind, and he wonders what was so important until it all clicks.

I really like this story, and it has a great concept, but it's kind of surviving on the concept alone. Give it that last little punch that will really bring it alive, and I'd be happy to post it. It's close enough that it wouldn't take a full read again, so choose the "back from Mars" option.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1876

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>No matter how frantically she called upon her magic//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

>tightly-closed//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb.

>The water burst from her mouth as she took in huge gasps of air, her whole body shaking as warm tears mixed with the icy cold drops on her cheeks.//

You intermittently use clusters of "as" clauses, giving the prose a locally repetitive feel, but having two of them in a single sentence is just clunky.

>thunk!//

Don't put sound effects in narration like that. Just describe the sound.

>Ma’am//

Why is that capitalized?

>Princess Celestia laying beaten on the floor//

Lay/lie confusion.

>I’m not sure what you mean, Miss.//

Same as the "ma'am" before. There's no reason to capitalize this. I won't mark any more, so scan for them.

>who Twilight took to be ‘Sabre,’//

whom

>‘round//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in the right way, or you can fool smart quotes by typing two apostrophes in a row and removing the first.

>snap!//

More sound effects. Honestly, that's a valid word anyway, so lose the italics and exclamation mark, and it'd be fine. I won't mark any more of these, either.

>Rainbow rolled with the blow, jumping back to her hooves with a quick wing flap and settling into a shaky attack stance.//

You started the chapter in Twilight's perspective, but for a while now, it's sounded rather omniscient. If you want a limited narrator, keep up the feel that it's from Twilight's viewpoint. Particularly during the exchange between these three OCs, the narration ignored Twilight altogether, so it no longer feels like her perception of their conversation, but more of an external observation of it.

>they seemed to be in//

This is the first statement in a while that has the narration expressing Twilight's thoughts for her, thus making it a limited narration. Keep this feel up consistently. You need to remind the reader of that narrative voice every few paragraphs at least, or it returns to feeling omniscient.

>laying on her side//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>this!?//

You'll normally italicize exclamation marks or question marks when they're on an italicized word.

>‘er//

Backward apostrophe. Just do a sweep for these.

>I’ll come back for you//

Missing period.

>Without a word Trails began to move at a brisk trot, her shoulder-light piercing the darkness before her. Sabre grabbed the lamp up off the floor with a wing, holding it up high in the middle of the group. Flint stayed in the back, occasionally shining his head-mounted light behind the group.//

You've been running the ragged edge of this the whole story. It'll take a bit of explanation. Authors just starting to gain a good amount of experience often discover the wonders that are the participial phrase and the absolute phrase, which is another type of participial structure. They're descriptive, they lend an air of sophistication, they add variety... but they're also unusual enough in everyday conversation that they stand out much more easily, and it doesn't take a lot of them to become repetitive. You've used a lot of both types of phrases throughout the story, enough so that it stands out to me. But it doesn't create as big a problem until an excerpt like this, where you not only have one of them in several consecutive sentences, but the sentences themselves are structurally identical, with that participial element tacked on after the main clause. When the sentence structures get in a rut like this, it can feel like reading a list. Overusing participial phrases also comes with its own attendant problems, like misplaced modifiers, dangling participles, and synchronization issues. I'll try to keep an eye out for an example of each one of those.

>doors and windows laying shattered out of their frames//

Lay/lie confusion. You got it right once.

>half by the upper half//

Watch repeating words in a close space like that.

Through this action sequence, you're again intermittently losing the feel of limited narration. Look what Twilight reacts to: the stench and the equipment the OCs carry. But she doesn't react to the sight of the changelings being torn apart. Wouldn't that affect her most of all?

>‘ol//

ol‘. You do this more than once.

>Sweet Celestia//

Curious that he uses this expression, yet they had no idea what Twilight meant when she referred to a princess.

>run a pony through running//

>fallen tree and falling//
>on her back began to unpack. Small jets of steam poured from a device on her back//
More close repetition.

>in an open-mouthed mixture of awe and fear//

It's never very effective to name character emotions overtly when you want the reader to identify with her. Think about how an actor gets you to think his character is angry. He behaves and appears a certain way such that you'll interpret him that way. He doesn't just tell you he's angry. So make her act and look awe-struck and afraid instead of telling the reader what to think. It's more engaging that way.

>Twilight’s mane and coat stood on end as it passed over her, crackling with electricity//

Here's an example of a participial phrase that's a misplaced modifier. I've encountered others that are technically so, but the type that are easy to figure out with simple logic. But this one is truly ambiguous. It's unclear whether you mean her coat or the device is crackling with electricity.

I could live with the amount of profanity that occurred early on, but it's getting pretty frequent here. Note that we try to appeal to a general audience, so there's only a certain amount of that we can tolerate, and if I get the sense that future chapters might be even worse, I'd have to wait and see them first.

>She always figured it out, she was Twilight Sparkle! She could save her friends, if she could just solve this problem.//

This is very much in Twilight's voice. Now look how long it's been since you had anything like this. The whole story so far is supposed to be about Twilight's experiences, but it's not keeping up that impression.

>eachother//

That's two words.

>she saw Trails suddenly stepped out of the wall a small distance away//

Typo.

>Rainbow skimmed the top of the tunnel, landing right in front of Sabre.//

Here's an example of how participles can mess up synchronization. A participle means that its action happens at the same time as the clause it's attached to, as well as any other actions that might be further synchronized through other participles and "as" clauses. So this says she landed at the same time she skimmed the top of the tunnel, but they'd surely happen one after the other.

>alot//

Typo.

>She was still scared and sad//

Then make the narration sound like she is. It shouldn't take direct information about it to communicate that to the reader.

>her escorts flashlights//

Missing apostrophe.

>There was a briefing hissing//

Typo.

>There was no land. No land to be seen in any direction. Just endless water.//

So where do all those underwater places get their oxygen? Wouldn't all the living things down there have used it up already if this is as far in the future as they imply?

Really, the biggest issue is the inconsistent narrative voice, but at least you're not violating the perspective by jumping around to different characters, which makes it a lot easier to fix. There's a fair amount of repetition, too. It's harder to do a meaningful search on the participial structures, but there are 104 instances of "as" in the story. Not all will be used like a conjunction, so the true number for the kind I'm looking for will be lower, but not by a lot. That's about one every four sentences, or about one every paragraph or two. That's a fair amount, but if you look how they're distributed through the story, they occur in clumps, too, which makes them very repetitive in small stretches. Lastly, I'm also a little concerned that there may be more profanity than we're comfortable with, since you're already skirting the edge of that.

Otherwise, it's an interesting premise and well written enough. I don't think you'd have a hard time putting that last bit of polish on it, and it's already at the point where I wouldn't have to give it a full read-through, so use the "back from Mars" option on the submission form.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1894

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>caught a hoof on a thick root sticking out of a puddle, slipped, staggered, then caught//

Watch the close word repetition.

>Something was up ahead, she could see a large shape through the shifting blanket of rain.//

Comma splice.

>She hoped nothing was living in there already.//

Before I explain the issue with this, let me recall a previous sentence:
>A cliff? A hill? A massive tree? Whatever it was, it was worth heading for.//
This is very conversational, and you have the narrator speaking Brulee's thoughts for her. Thus, you're using a limited narrator. So, back to my original point. It's already understood that a limited narrator relates the thoughts and perceptions of the focus character. You don't need to say Brulee saw something, because it's already implicit in the fact that the narrator described it. You've done something like that already. And here, you don't need to say she hopes something. Just have the narrator hope it, and it's understood to be her. By wedging that extra step between the reader and character, you're making it less engaging.

>She took a breath, and stepped forward.//

That's all one clause (all the subjects perform all the verbs), so you don't need a comma.

>thin high//

>short narrow//
Those are coordinate adjectives (they describe the same aspect of something), so they need a comma between them.

>They’d been taught in school about times long ago when ponies and gryphons had been at war; and heard stories that before that, gryphons would sometimes hunt ponies as prey.//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to split the sentence in two there, but what comes after it couldn't stand on its own.

>You must be really cold, you’re wet through.//

Comma splice.

>She wondered, did gryphons have the same habit?//

Another one of those verbs you should really try to avoid with a limited narrator.

>Brûlée was surprised.//

And that's similar. Make the narration sound surprised, like the internal monologue that would be running through her head as a result. Don't just tell me she's surprised.

>And then one time we found these ants with big orange backsides that looks like honey//

Typo.

>He’s pretty cool, he’s the one that took me to the town.//

Comma splice.

>stuck up//

Hyphenate.

>Her voice sank in defeat.//

You just said in the last bit of narration what her voice was doing. But this is more what I wanted to get at:
>Ava snorted in resentment.//
You do this occasionally: have a <preposition><emotion> phrasing, and it's an insidious little thing many authors do. You're basically feeding a conclusion to the reader so he doesn't have to think about it, but you should want him to think about it. That's how you get him engaged in your characters. Make your character behave and appear in ways that get these emotions across, then let the reader deduce them. It's much more engaging.

>and seemed to be talking more to herself than to her companion//

Keep in mind she's your perspective character. So this is a weird observation for her to make about herself. It sounds more like it's from Ava's perspective.

>Ava tried to picture it. She’d never seen six hundred of any creature all at once, except for ants or fireflies.//

And this is definitely from Ava's perspective. Why are you going over to her? This isn't vital information.

>Yeee~s//

That's not really proper punctuation. Just describe how she says it.

>It would be just like him to try and pull a big stunt like that, he did crazy stuff all through school.//

Comma splice.

>This time it was Ava’s turn. Gryphons aren’t normally the touchy sort, but it seemed like the right thing to do. She awkwardly reached a wing round Brûlée’s body and pulled her into a gentle hold.//

You'd gone back to Brulee's viewpoint, but now you're with Ava again. This scene definitely needs some consistency in perspective.

>Ava wasn’t used to seeing herself though anypony else’s eyes, and felt oddly uneasy being examined like this.//

Perspective's slipping again.

>Ava was impressed, even though she didn’t understand a word of it.//

Another perspective slip. It's not that you can't communicate these things about her, but say how Brulee perceives evidence of them, not from inside Ava's head. You did it right a bit earlier:
>Ava seemed to understand, as her face fell in concert.//

>Brûlée looked nonplussed//

And here, you're essentially having Brulee evaluate her own expression, which she can't even see, instead of relating the emotion behind it.

>“Wild animal”.//

Period goes inside the quotes.

>who she’d rushed to defend//

>and who she was devastated to have let down//
whom

I'm a little surprised at the lack of closure to Ava's side of the story. Is Brulee going to buy her those scarves? Is Ava going to follow through with trying to get her brother back in school? You don't have to show all that happening, but just suggesting they're going to makes that plotline feel resolved. Otherwise, it just gets strangely dropped.

Anyway, the only real issue here is the perspective issues that cropped up, mostly in chapter 2. If you can get those fixed up, this would be a nice little piece. I wouldn't have to read through it all the way again, so you can mark it as "back from Mars."

Shrink LaureateCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1897

Thanks for the feedback. I hadn't quite decided on the limited/omniscient narration when I started writing, but it clearly is a limited narration story. It might take me a while to get the subtleties of that sorted out consistently.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1898

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The editing's not bad, but it could use touching up.

The sentence structures get really repetitive. It takes until near the end of the first chapter before you mix in more variety. Up until then, nearly every one of them starts with the subject.

I'm surprised that Bear Claws is so affected by the deaths of Blueblood's parents. For one, it's not clear he knew them, so he may be upset just because it's a sad situation, not because he has any personal investment in it. But contrast that with Celestia's reaction. She doesn't seem to care about it in the least. She doesn't bat an eye. And she barely expresses any concern for Blueblood over it. What concern she does express is much more implied than overt, too.

That first scene is also incredibly rapid-paced. We have the guard rushing in, dropping this bombshell, pretty much only he reacts to it, then Celestia convinces him he shouldn't be a soldier anymore. That's a lot of turning points to resolve and make feel authentic in just eighteen short paragraphs, all but one of them just one or two lines long.

In chapter 4, when Twilight is talking to Blueblood, look at your pattern of sentences in paragraphs. The narration is pretty skimpy, and it's always structured so similarly. One of them will get a very short action sentence beginning with their name, then a bit of speech. Then the same for the other character. Back and forth. It get repetitive, but it also doesn't do much to set the scene or convey all the nonverbal cues that go into a conversation. To illustrate, I'm going to pull out every piece of narration from a consecutive stretch of paragraphs.

>Shining Armor smiled.

>With that, Shining Armor and Cadance walked off behind the hedges. Twilight and Blueblood watched them leave, then turned to look back at each other. Twilight frowned. she said
>Blueblood asked.
>Twilight scowled. she icily spat.
>Blueblood raised his hooves. he told her.
>Twilight glared at him. she said
>Twilight moved closer to Blueblood. Twilight jabbed Blueblood in the chest with her hoof
>Blueblood backed away from Twilight. he whimpered.
>Twilight nodded at him.
>The two sat in silence for a few seconds before Blueblood opened his mouth. he said.
>Twilight stopped frowning.
>Blueblood frowned.
>Twilight nodded. She smiled.
>Blueblood said
>Twilight groaned.
>Blueblood nodded.
>Twilight shook her head.
>Blueblood steepled his hooves.
>Twilight brightened up.
>Blueblood told her.
>Twilight’s smile dropped.
>Twilight waved him off.
>Blueblood said a slouch He straightened back up.
>Twilight said.
>Blueblood shook his head.
>Twilight put her hoof to her chin.
>Blueblood looked down his nose at her.
>Twilight frowned. she mumbled.
>Blueblood’s face softened.
>Twilight shook her head. Twilight swallowed.
>Twilight shook her head again, slowly.
>Blueblood hmmed.
>Twilight turned away from Blueblood.
>Blueblood was about to bite back when a tear rolled down Twilight’s cheek. Blueblood shut up and walked around her. Twilight turned away from him again.
>Twilight sighed. Twilight turned to face Blueblood, another few tears running down her face.
>Blueblood awkwardly laid a hoof on her shoulder.
>Twilight sniffled.
>Blueblood blinked.
>Twilight sobbed. Blueblood stared at her.
>Twilight spat. Twilight wiped her eyes.
>Blueblood pulled Twilight closer to him.
>Twilight’s frown deepened.
>Twilight scoffed.
>Twilight glared at him.
>Blueblood hesitated.
>Twilight slumped forward and lay on the ground, eyes getting puffy. Blueblood released Twilight from the hug, then lay down next to her.
>Twilight turned away.
>Blueblood nodded.
>Twilight turned back to face him.
>Blueblood assured her.
>Twilight sighed.
>Blueblood smiled.
>Twilight brightened up.

There's very little to visualize in much of that, it's not very descriptive, it's repetitive in structure, and it reuses a lot of the same actions multiple times. You're relying on the dialogue alone to carry the majority of what's going on.

You tell most of the story from an omniscient perspective, but so often, you will start scene with a very omniscient-sounding summary of what's happened since the last scene and what's going on now. The two are in a bit of conflict, unless the character is reasonably thinking those same things himself. And then you have to give him a plausible reason to do so. When you have a limited narrator, it's important to establish the perspective character right away at the beginning of a scene.

There are also times that you probably think you're delving into the character's head, but it's actually going the other way. I'll pull out an example:

>His mind poisoned any happy thought as it was proposed.//

This is a very internal process, so it's a close narration to him, right? Actually, it's a very factual statement about what should be a very emotional moment, so it feels quite sterile. From his viewpoint, he's not going to give a calm summary. He's experiencing these thoughts, so from inside his head, we'd see them happening and getting corrupted. In short, demonstrate what you're saying here, don't just state it.

There are some scenes that do sound omniscient from start to finish. While there's no absolute rule that says you can't do this, it does create a very inconsistent feel for the reader. Definitely on a scene level, you ought to be more uniform, and it's a good idea to have the whole story that way.

All this talk about churches presents a bit of a world-building problem. Since we've never seen any such thing in the show, it does need some explanation, but it never gets one. You just kind of toss it in there like the reader should know it already.

Spike's death at least makes sense, since he was a major character. I don't see the point of Rafter, though. He gets introduced, then within half a page, he's dead. It's not important to the story, and he doesn't get brought up again, at least not in this chapter. We'll see if anything ever comes of that, but if not, needless tragedy isn't a good thing.

In the scene where Spike's faking an illness, watch the perspective. You're with Blueblood for most of it, but you slip into Spike's viewpoint briefly.

I'm utterly confused about what happened when Blueblood got sick and you started flashing back to his younger ages. You hadn't established a perspective in that scene, so I don't even know whose memories they are. Plus it set up some sort of emergency, only to have the next scene be very calm, and it turned out to be something rather ordinary.

In chapter 10, Blueblood's your perspective character in the scene where he gets a letter. It says he didn't read the whole thing, yet the narration presents the whole thing. If he didn't read it all, then the limited narrator in his perspective can't show me the parts he didn't read.

There are better ways to segue into flashbacks than a really obtrusive "Eight years ago" scene break marker.

So there's finally a later tie-in to having Rafter die, but it's a pretty weak one that would have still worked if only Spike had died. You don't want to throw needless tragedy into a story, because it will just make things feel shallow.

Chapter 12. In Spike's addition to the letter, you have a strikethrough. That's a really trite thing authors like to do that is rarely appropriate. Is Spike rushed for time? That's the only reason he'd do this. It's a way to cheat and show something no reasonable letter writer would actually do. If he's decided not to write that, he can simply erase it or rewrite the letter. It also means he didn't think through what to write before actually writing it. By leaving it in there, he must not care if Blueblood sees that, or else he's deliberately communicating something by putting it in there that way. And I suppose I could buy it in that sense, but too many authors never think through the medium they're using, particularly what limitations it has, and it leaves things feeling inauthentic. You just don't see this in real letters.

Good job with the archaic speech, though there are a couple of slips. I see the verb ending missing from a "thou" conjugation, and a few spots of "thy" that should be "thine" (this form is also used when the following word begins in a vowel). And one place where you have an "art" that should be "is."

I'm not sure why they're going on about an accent. I didn't notice you describing her as having one. Are you just talking about the archaic usage, because that isn't an accent.

So, I'm finally at the end. It was a well-written enough story, and I mostly had only the detailed issues I've already discussed. There was one other—I don't know how this is supposed to mesh with canon.When Rarity gushes about the chance to meet Blueblood at the Gala, Twilight never says anything about it. Heck, if she was such good friends with him, why wouldn't she have been looking forward to the possibility of seeing him there? It's really strange that there's no explanation offered of how they make no attempt to see each other and Twilight never mentions even knowing him. Spike, too. Really, that wouldn't be so hard to fix. Maybe Blueblood swears her to secrecy about it since he doesn't want her to ever let slip he has a history of depression or something.

That would have been it, but once I finally got to the end of the story, it didn't go anywhere. What conclusion did you want me to draw? Luna finally returns, she gets to meet Blueblood, and... what? The story hadn't been leading up to this. It had all been about how Blueblood came to be the person he is, yet the end doesn't come to a conclusion about it or round off some character growth of his. It just kind of stops.

There are exceptions, but they're rare. Stories need to either set up and resolve a conflict or show character development so the reader gains a new appreciation of that character. You had both through the story, leaning more toward the latter, but the ending had nothing to do with that. Really, the whole last chapter had nothing to do with it. You have the lead-up to a proper ending. You just don't have the proper ending, and it wouldn't be too hard to come up with one of those, either.

Which just leaves the editing. There are lots of little typos, usage errors, grammatical mistakes, and the like scattered around, too many for me to point them all out. Have a good proofreading pass done.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1901

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>my gilded snuff box inlaid with a turquoise stone, inherited from my great-grandfather, my brass pocket watch, and my wedding band. I would ask the ponies reading this not to cast away these baubles.//

That first list item has its own "and" and internal comma, so separate the list items with semicolons.

>a tax rise//

Odd phrasing. Why wouldn't he call it a hike or an increase?

>cross section//

Hyphenate.

>I was impelled to unite//

Fine shade of meaning, but "impelled" connotes that he got swept up in the current, not of his own volition. Sounds like you want "compelled," which can mean coercion by others or his own sensibilities.

>&c.//

I guess that's the same as "etc."? I've never seen it before, but isn't this whole story supposed to be some written record? And wouldn't "et" be much easier to write than "&"?

>Opulana//

The title of an epic poem would be italicized.

>Stout, unthinking, and resentful, his character and his ideals//

Those adjectives are describing his character and ideals, not him.

>at least where concerned drinks we were//

Some jumbled wording in there.

There are a number of criticisms of this story in the old write-off discussion thread I remember seeing, and I agree with a lot of them.

For one, this:
>Symbols of Equestrian domination were to be discarded—the ship was to be repainted to conceal its origins, its Equestrian flag burned, and all the Celestia-worshipping ornaments and heraldic symbols contained within its vast wooden case were to be thrown out to the sea. This was an easy decision.//
Easy for Scarlet Flame, yes. But in your response to reviews, you reiterate that the diary writer merely got swept up in this sentiment after grumbling about his taxes; he never had any particular gripe with Celestia personally or against the government. So this kind of statement fights that characterization, as he sure seems to agree with it here. I get what you said about Scarlet being opposed to any government; he could twist it so even a benevolent one like that was oppressive to him, but the protagonist has much less reason to, and it feels like he's really buying into this.

>“Meaningless symbols of wasteful cruelty!” roared Scarlet Flame, holding up a shining goblet in a shaking hoof.//

Why didn't he bring this up before they left? It's actually plausible he wouldn't have, for selfish reasons, but what's less plausible is that the protagonist doesn't call him out on it, not even in his own head.

>A dark red earth colt spoke up, a colt I knew to be Bumper Crop, the leader of a group among us that was known for its steadfast opposition to the settlers’ movement in Equestria.//

There's no independent clause after the semicolon.

Around here, you're losing the feel of a diary, which you did well at the beginning. People just don't write that much quoted dialogue in diary entries. Single lines that stuck in their head, yes, but not entire speeches. It's not reasonable that he'd remember it that precisely hours later. Maybe if he had the diary with him and he wrote it as it happened, but he couldn't—he already stashed it away, and it'd likely be taken from him if anyone saw it.

>When I turned ten, my momma sent me to the mill and since then I learned to know my value by the bits in my purse.//

That's another criticism I remember seeing: that this is a thinly veiled parallel of Earth, with events that wouldn't seem to fit in canon Equestria. Child labor is pretty out there.

>Today, I am nineteen years old//

So why'd the narrator call her a filly.

>It was at this juncture that first found myself in conflict with Scarlet Flame.//

Missing word.

Another thing hurting the diary format: these events have definite time skips, even if overnight, but it's written as a continuous record. When does he actually catch up on recording events? And when he does, why isn't there some kind of break? If it's because he writes it all at the end, then it makes it even more unbelievable that he'd remember all this quoted dialogue.

>held one of Shores’ book.//

Typo. And why is he just now getting to this? On the first day, he took some books from the rich ponies. Why wouldn't he have taken them all then?

>he become//

Typo.

I also saw your argument about why these unicorns would be particularly unsuited to defending themselves, but even that's hard to buy. Levitation comes pretty much as a second nature to them, so is it so hard to think they could use that to hold up a broomstick, a tree branch, and opponent, and swing them around? And your argument about why there are no pegasi here—there isn't the world-building to support that. That should have occurred way back at the beginning to show why none of the pegasi were interested in joining. You already have something very cross-cultural here, with a mix of aristocratic unicorns and earth pony manual laborers. That's why it's so odd to see the lack of pegasi.

>clobbered//

That sure seems an odd use of vernacular in a narration that's been so stuffy and formal.

>What happened next I cannot precisely say, as I was continuously easing in and out of consciousness.//

So it will have been some time before he had access to his diary. Even more evidence that there's no way he'd remember quoted dialogue.

>remembering the sensation of her feathers//

So... why did she run away instead of fly?

I waited until the end to say this, and it turns out I didn't need to. You have an awful lot of "to be" verbs early on. I expected that would persist throughout, but it thankfully didn't, still, if you're going to have an excess of them, the beginning and end are the worst places, since they sap the story of its action. You want to grab the reader's interest right up front, not make the story feel stagnant.

Now, the biggie. Many people accused this of being "not a pony story." I generally don't care much about that, unless it comes from the other direction: clearly a story originally about something else that's had ponies pasted into it. You're right on the edge, and I can see why this story would garner those kinds of accusations, but at the very least, it requires the reader to know who Celestia is and what kind of society these characters are leaving. So I'm not particularly concerned about that.

It is a fairly well-worn plot, though, and right off the bat, it broadcasts where it's going. Then it never does much to throw any surprises in there. There's a bit of Lord of the Flies in there and some Heart of Darkness. And I guess this gets back to how "pony" this is. It basically retells one of those types of stories, but it doesn't infuse it with anything particularly pony. I still wouldn't go so far as to call it "not pony," but when even I have a few reservations, and I'm one of the most permissive guys out there on the subject, I can see far more people having issues.

Really, the biggest thing I'm fully comfortable saying needs attention, though, is that it's not quite convincing as a diary story, for reasons that I've already stated several times. There's a lot of good writing here; it just doesn't make convincing use of the format you've chosen.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1903

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>...//

And already, on the first line. Look, I know people are used to seeing this as valid dialogue in video games, but in writing, it conveys nothing. Just that there's a pause, but no indication of why or what's happening during the pause.

>So, uh, hi.//

You're playing with fire here. I'll reserve judgment until I see how the story plays out, but odds are you're not going to follow through on what this line implies.

>Well... how about you start at the beginning, then?//

A step in the right direction, at least. Maybe you'll pull it off.

>when a Changeling Queen feels that food resources are high//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

>nymphs - Okay//

Please use a proper dash. This is a recurring issue.

>Professional honor and also horrible pain of death, of course.//

Not sure why it was necessary to end two sentences in a row with the same phrase.

>if I were to get captured//

Another spot where you need to set off a dependent clause with a comma.

>ask; what is with pony names anyway?//

For a semicolon to be properly used, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete. What comes before it here couldn't. A dash would be fine, and in this case, so would a colon.

>so I got to learn a lot about what was going on//

Needs a comma here as well. You'll normally use one with a conjunction when it separates subject-verb pairs where each verb belongs to only one subject, like what you have here: "I got... and she seemed..."

>Got me some nice snacks to get//

>away to myself while she takes tea about ten feet away//
Watch repetitive use of a word in a close space like that.

>To which I reply; “Oh,”//

You don't introduce dialogue with a semicolon. A comma or colon would be fine there.

>cordone//

cordon

>laid back to take a nap//

Lay/lie confusion.

>… Well//

When it starts a sentence, don't leave a space after an ellipsis. Except this isn't really the appropriate place for a leading ellipsis. They're for completing a thought dropped earlier or for something just becoming audible (the one hearing it is waking up, or the source is just coming into hearing range, for example). You do this a number of times.

>What did they say.//

Isn't that a question?

>tossing him a towel from next to the operating table which he caught in his fangs//

The "from next to the operating table" is pretty extraneous, and it also muddles things, as it makes it sound like he's catching the table.

>since he’d spooked her speaking up//

Seems like that would sound less awkward if you put a "by" in there.

>your Majesty//

Both words of the honorific get capitalized.

>wide eyed//

Hyphenate.

>the model of causal innocence//

I was going to hold discussion of this until the end, but I'll step in here to make a brief comment. This is someone's opinion, but it's not clear whose. You haven't adopted a perspective in this scene. But it would be a little weird for Nichts to make such an external evaluation of himself, so whoever's perspective this is, it doesn't seem like his.

>Please Your Majesty,//

Direct address in the middle of a sentence gets commas on both sides.

>to hard to pronounce//

>amature//
Typos.

>“Hey, I resemble that remark!”//

Who says this? Luna? It sure doesn't sound like something she'd say.

>Last I heard the she ate the last//

Typo and repetition.

>And that sister//

Needs a comma for direct address, and when used as a term of address, "Sister" should be capitalized.

>“I’m afraid not,” Celestia smiled//

You're using a non-speaking action as a speech attribution. How do you smile a sentence?

>and here I thought that would work//

Capitalization.

>touched, that you chose to let me know you were alive//

Why in the world is that comma there?

Okay, there are a few weird things going on here. I'll start with the least serious one. The first scene break—what's going on there? You don't have a change of place, time, or even perspective. It cuts right in the middle of a sentence. I have no idea why you'd want to do that. I get that you have a change in narrative style there, but I'll talk about that in a minute.

Dash shows up very suddenly right then. It completely caught me off guard and led to me misinterpreting several things, then having to read back over parts of it. That's not good. Why would you spring her on the reader there? You don't have a reason to keep her presence secret, but she must have been there. Why? What was she doing in Canterlot in the first place, and why would she want to accompany Twilight on this investigation? I was certain for a while that Nichts had taken her form to... I don't know. Show off? Make a point? It wasn't until a number of paragraphs later that you made it clear both were present. And then she barely does anything, certainly nothing important. I'm left wondering why you even bothered to include her.

Now to the biggie. You have the first scene as essentially dialogue only. Gimmicks like that have their uses, but they generally work best when they fall out as something that happens to fit the story. As in: you decided on a premise and plot, and later reason out that dialogue-only would be especially suited for the setup. Deciding first that you want to do dialogue-only just for its own sake then crafting a story around it rarely results in good storytelling.

I'll talk very briefly about what does work for such things. Say you have two characters conversing in the dark, or through a wall, or one of them is blind. There would still be a purpose in narration for those, since characters would still be aware of their thoughts and movements, for instance, but it at least takes the big first step toward justifying the elimination of the visual component of what's happening.

So back to the gimmick. You make it even weirder by having the conversation not even presented as dialogue, but as a limited narration and a differentiated font that represents another character's speech. So it takes a while to even figure out what it is. He could have been carrying on an internal monologue, arguing with himself. Then it starts to sound like he might be talking to a reporter, than an interrogator. And when it's finally revealed to be Twilight, it's not particularly surprising, nor does it change my interpretation of the story. There isn't a light buln that goes on and makes me recontextualize what I've read.

Now another tangent. The first scene almost takes on the feel of a second-person perspective, though it never quite settles in to that. What's most pertinent about that is that Nichts seems to be addressing the reader. I don't know why you wouldn't just have Twilight's responses as dialogue; your formatting is more commonly the kind I see when the story is indicating what the reader says in a second-person perspective. The issue there is that Nichts is talking to an audience, and you don't define who that audience is. It's a common problem in writing that addresses the reader. Now you've made the reader a character, and he needs the same motivation any character does: Why is he there? Why does he want to hear Nichts's story? Why does Nichts want to tell him?

Except that turns out not to be the case at the exact moment you realized the weakness of a dialogue-only format and needed some narration to show me what's happening. It's rather cheap to back out of your narrative choice the moment it becomes inconvenient, but I think it exposes that it wasn't a good choice to start with. You use Nichts's limited narration to good effect, showing how he feels about what's happening through his stream-of-consciousness comments, particularly the parts that he doesn't care to speak aloud to Twilight. But a limited narrator in his perspective can only say what he knows or perceives. And you've cut out the perception part by restricting yourself to dialogue. He can't know what's going on in Twilight's head explicitly, and your gimmick means he can't give me the external evidence of it, either, so Twilight is left as an emotionless husk. Couple that with the fact that easily half of a conversation is nonverbal anyway, and it means that eschewing narration already limits your options in injecting emotion to the story. So Twilight's parts in the first scene are very dry and do nothing to bring her character alive. Then suddenly she is there in the flesh, acting like a normal person would, and it makes her appearance in the opening scene very dull in comparison.

So I don't see how the format you've chosen is a good fit for the story, and you didn't even commit to it. It's a good idea for a story, and the sentence-level writing is pretty good. I found it reasonably funny as well. But I don't think the method for delivery is working.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1905

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>that she made imagined them//

Typo.

>They were just kids, as simply said by the eyes of her teacher.//

I'm not sure what this is trying to say. My best guess is that the teacher's watching her as well, can tell that she's visualizing the other kids this way, and is trying to dissuade her from doing so. But that's an awful lot to have to read into this.

>It was just from the wind, she fancied to herself.//

>Where was she supposed to go?//
Note the difference here. In the second one, you're willing to have the narrator speak her thoughts for her. But in the first, you feel the need to have the narrator wedge in an attribution, essentially disavowing himself of her thoughts and making sure I know they belong to Dash only. If you had just taken the "she fancied to herself" off that, then you'd have a consistent narrative voice here. You really need to decide whether you want Dash and the narrator to be the same or separate. If they're the same, you don't have to qualify the narrator's statements as reflecting Dash's perceptions and attitudes; that's already understood. But if you want them to be separate, then you can't have the narrator adopting her thoughts as his own, like you do in the second one. Basically, choose one and stick with it throughout the story. Now, there are times that even within a limited narration, the narrator might still want to identify a thought as the character's but that's generally held for times where you really need to have the thought occur as first-person, make sure the reader knows the thought occurred verbatim, or rephrasing it becomes awkward. None of those apply here.

>Perhaps they would just go away, //

Continuing from the last comment, you more often seem to be taking a limited voice, like this one. Another aspect of that is that the limited voice needs to sound like the character, and I just don't see Dash, particularly a young one, using a word like "perhaps."

>the girl didn't sneak a look//

Again, when you take a conversational, very limited voice like in the last bit I excerpted, you're asserting that the character is the narrator. But Dash wouldn't refer to herself with such an external term as "the girl." You wouldn't do that in a first-person narration, and really the only difference between that and a third-person one this limited is what pronouns you use.

>Her feet flew in a unsteady blur.//

This also seems like an external viewpoint to her. How would she see this to comment on it? She's not looking at her feet.

>an endless race where she was the winner, and never had to stop.//

How does she win if the race doesn't stop? Maybe she just sees herself in the lead?

>She would receive the most money in the world; she could afford anything!//

That's kind of oddly phrased, plus it's not really the point of her reverie. So far, she hasn't fantasized about wanting to buy something or fitting in with the rich kids or anything, so it's a little off topic and not really relevant.

>the lean girl//

Another external reference that doesn't fit the limited narrator.

>Her stomach dropped in fear and excitement//

Try to avoid directly naming emotions like that. It's better to imply them through how the characters act and appear. Think of how you figure out that a movie character is happy, for instance. It's not because he says he is.

>minuscule//

Just another example of word choice that I can't imagine Dash using. You need to match the narrative voice to the character for this type of narration, including vocabulary, personality, and intelligence level.

>Dash let her eyes slide close.//

Closed.

>The girl found her mouth filled with dirt//

I'm not going to mark any more of these references. Suffice it to say they don't fit the narrative well.

>shaking her head violently. Dash shakingly//

Watch repeating a word that closely.

>a frown forming on her features//

This is rather external, too, since it makes the frown feel autonomous, unlinked from her. And when she's the one telling it, it doesn't match well.

>She got up, vainly dusting off her worn jeans.//

Is this part of class? Doesn't she change into something else for that?

>Dash looked up at the faces of her fellow classmates, and slowly walked towards them.//

You don't need a comma in cases like this, where it's all one clause. Dash does both verbs.

>a mocking voice//

You've used "mocking" a number of times already. It's getting repetitive.

>of course sweetie//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Dash face contorted//

Missing a possessive.

>little-//

Use a proper dash.

>she screamed, stumbling up in the dirt.//

This is the third sentence in a row to have a participial phrase tacked on the end. You don't want to have that much structural repetition.

>light haired//

>aqua colored//
Hyphenate.

>With her body shaking//

Seems an irrelevant detail to the sentence, and it's unclear which one it refers to anyway.

>the one that sat in the back//

You've intermittently done this in the story, but when you're talking about a person, use "who," not "that."

>grape colored//

>mouse brown//
Hyphenate.

>14 year old//

Hyphenate, and spell out numbers that short. Yet this is another external reference that doesn't fit the narrative voice.

>She made her way back to the mudroom, pulling open the fridge against the wall.//

You're using enough of these participial phrases that they get a bit repetitive, but they also cause other problems. Participles mean that things happen at the same time, so you have her walking toward the mudroom while somehow opening the refrigerator that's in there.

>made her heart leapt//

Typo.

>Dash felt a surge of euphoria in her heart.//

Instead of just identifying it as such, how does this feel? What physical symptoms are there? What sorts of images flash through her mind?

>The pony laughed//

Missing a line break here.

>Dash mouth//

Missing possessive.

>coarse through her veins//

course

>that send warmth//

Typo.

>The lavender pony took a hold of Dash's hoof, and fell forward.//

Another missing line break, and you don't need that comma.

>I'm glad you're here to.//

To/too confusion.

>Dash smiled, gazing out to the golden horizon.//

Look at how all of your sentences begin for a while. The just alternate between "Dash" and some version of "the pony."

I'm really mystified as to what's supposed to be happening here, or more to the point, how it relates to MLP. We've seen a lot of stories where the whole MLP universe is some imaginary construct in a particular character's head. But what she imagines here is only MLP in the most perfunctory sense. She's got one other character and no world beyond that. There's only a slight hint that this other character is Twilight, so I assume the implication is that Dash is just starting to imagine this place and will build on it later. So she'll end up incorporating the obvious Fluttershy parallel at some point.

To be honest, I'm not sure what to make of this. I'm going to send it back anyway over the perspective issues, but if you fix those up and decide to submit it again, I'm probably going to have to ask someone else to weigh in on this. It just barely touches on MLP and in a way that someone who knew nothing about the show could read it without missing anything. It's a nice character piece, in any case.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1913

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The atmosphere was thin and highly acidic//

>metallic fuselage//
This would seem to be a bad combination.

>which was certain to be unpleasant to the alicorn//

You're using a limited narrator who expresses Twilight's opinions for her, so she essentially is the narrator. So when you use a descriptor like this (the alicorn), it implies that's what she'd use to describe herself, which is odd. Someone who uses third-person, external viewpoints like Trixie, maybe, but not Twilight. And things like this are for specificity anyway, but she's the only one there, so why would you need to distinguish her?

>Worn and dulled through use, the dust that now stuck to it was an almost unnoticeable addition.//

This says the dust was worn and dulled through use.

>Twilight kept her eyes closed for a moment too long, and her mind began to imagine impossible voices; voices which called her darling and egghead and sugar cube, and implored her to come with them.//

For a semicolon to be properly used, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both sentences stand as complete. But what comes after it here couldn't.

>She planted every conceivable scanner, detector, and probe into the rocky surface; each one custom built by her own hooves.//

Same deal with the semicolon. You'll need to scan for these yourself.

>the alicorn slumped to the ground//

That reference again. I'm not going to mark any more of these, either.

>6//

Write out numbers that short.

>Twilight found the comparison//

Missing a line break here. I saw quite a few of these.

>And yet, its demand for attention was as great and incessant as a siren.//

It's rarely correct to use a comma after a conjunction. This is not one of those times.

>A brilliant magenta glow began at the tip of her horn, and spread to cover everything in her vicinity.//

That's all one clause—the same subject performs both verbs—so you don't need the comma. This is an intermittent issue.

>argutite//

Why would you pick that one? (Answer: because you want to be as obscure as possible, and a major ore like germanite is more likely for a reader to understand from context.)

>xenotime//

Which one? And that's not the kind of mineral you'd really expect to be associated with PGM ores. For that matter, neither is argutite. And there are better ores for more useful REEs than yttrium. In fact, going back to argutite, it's not even an economically viable source of germanium (not to mention that germanium doesn't have as much use as it once did, due to the availability of very pure silicon these days). Most germanium comes as a byproduct from sphalerite or coal. Yes, argutite would be easier to extract germanium from, since most germanium ores are sulfides (including as impurities in sphalerite and coal) and have to be converted to oxides first, essentially argutite. So it would be very convenient for her if she could find it in quantity. And I also get that this is an alien world, and you can make its geology whatever you want. But when you're tying it so closely to Earth-like occurrences in ores, it's odd to break from that. Why not just make native germanium a thing on this planet? You've already made massive native platinum a thing, whereas on Earth it occurs more commonly as alloys or placer nuggets (even so-called native platinum on Earth is typically an alloy with minor iron and PGEs).

>per— dear//

Don't put any spaces around an em dash.

>I– I//

Use a hyphen for stutters, and with no spaces.

>Pr–princess Twilight Sparkle?//

Again, a hyphen for a stutter, and both parts of "Princess" need to be capitalized, since it's a title, not just something that starts the sentence.

>the five ponies that surrounded her//

It's generally preferred when talking about sentient beings to use "who" instead of "that."

>she had tread//

In that tense, "had trodden" or "had trod."

>That left Twilight very few options for the little pony she saved.//

She's already saved him, so put that in past perfect tense.

>never to either again//

Seems like you're missing a word.

>Rather than sending him back to the Federation, she had to bring them here.//

They seem to catch up to her periodically anyway, and she'd already mentioned how long it would be before she expected another encounter. It wasn't too long either, so why not just turn him over then?

>medium range vessel//

>long range operations//
medium-range, long-range

>supporting ships//

Just in case you want to use real Navy terminology for that, the non-combat escorts (refuelling, resupply, etc.) are called auxiliaries or auxiliary vessels. The combat ones would collectively (with the carrier) be called a strike group, task group, or battle group.

>beside the sheer luck they seemed to enjoy much of recently//

I guess there's an oblique meaning that might work here, but it seems like "besides" is the better choice. They don't mean the same thing.

>wide eyed//

Hyphenate.

>A pang of sadness gripped her heart//

Demonstration is far more powerful that cold fact. If the reader sees Twilight acting sad, it's much more lifelike than just being told she's sad. So what does this make her do? Externally, there may be action or body language. Internally, there may be quick memories or images that go through her head, or she may have some physical sensations from the emotion.

>How have you been Twilight?//

She doesn't have any choice, does she? In other words, you need a comma for direct address.

>30//

Spell out numbers that short. I'm not gong to mark any more of these, but it's just a guideline to write out short numbers. What qualifies as short depends on who you ask, but most sources say to use numerals only when it would take more than 3-4 words.

>one that has to authorize it//

"Who," not "that."

>now somber and without the previous cheer//

So let me see it and make my own judgment.

>Cadence broke into a soft smile, as she lifted up a new sheet of paper.//

I'll just break in here, since you've been using commas with "as" clauses a lot. This is one of the exceptions to placing commas between clauses, because it helps differentiate the meaning. With a comma, "as" tends to sound like "because," and without one, it tends to sound like "at the same time that."

>Twilight could see the strain in her eyes, and the fiery determination behind it.//

You need three items in a list before it requires commas.

>all…” she lifted a hoof into the air, and gestured back and forth. “… this.//

Here's how to put a narrative aside in a quote. Note that the aside doesn't take a period (other end punctuation can be used as appropriate).
all—” she lifted a hoof into the air, and gestured back and forth “—this.

>she held an expression of pure resignation//

Let me see it. Otherwise, it's so distant from the reader.

>“However, the good news is that there’s another way!”//

The last paragraph ended with her dialogue as well, and there's no intervening narration, so the convention is to omit the closing quotes at the end of the previous paragraph.

>faster than light//

In this usage, the whole phrase is an adjective, so hyphenate it.

>“But we can’t risk it if they’re not.//

Same deal with leaving off the end quotes on the previous paragraph.

>EQS Harmony//

The affiliation is part of the name; italicize the whole thing.

>Though I could technically siphon fuel from my stars, it’s my right to do so.//

Comma splice.

>Though, it would be//

No reason for that comma to be there.

>And from here it looks nothing like what you would see back in the Federation.//

And interesting point when it comes to space travel. For that matter, it's possible that it's quite far from its apparent location (as seen from her home) or that it no longer even exists.

>Though, Twilight did feel a slight bit of remorse//

Why do you like to put a comma after that word? And this is the kind of emotion you'd do better to show through the narrative tone rather than state outright.

>She was overwhelmed with nausea, and immediately sat back down after working the cramps out of her wings.//

You take a conversational style in the narration from time to time, so why not here, where she's definitely out of the norm? The narration sure doesn't sound like she feels anything but standard.

>galloped stern//

A non doesn't parse there. Sternward or astern, maybe. Or in proper Navy parlance, aft.

>only find them without family or home or livelihood//

Seems like you're missing a "to."

>“I took it upon myself to learn their names.//

Looks like you have an extra line break before this.

>Alright girls//

Needs a comma for direct address. And by now, I assume her friends are actually long dead, and she knows that?

>Alright egghead//

Needs a coma for direct address.

>The roar of a jet engine running at full throttle drowned out any other noise.//

It's unclear whether it was off or at idle until now, but jet engines don't spool up quite that fast.

>the sound of the engines retreated into a dull droning//

So it has multiple engines? Because you just mentioned Twilight only hearing one.

>that was reckless Rainbow Dash//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>The jet engine rumbled to life once more//

After throttling back for cruise, she's only steadily increased it. So how does whatever she's doing now constitute them "rumbling to life"?

So this is an interesting story concept, and I'm not familiar with the source material, so I don't know how closely you follow the plot or the development. I say that because I don't know if you're structuring yours the same. I find it a little frustrating that I basically have very little idea what's going on, and if the original is that way, too, then I suppose you could say you were remaining faithful to that, but it doesn't make the reading experience any more satisfying. I'm sure you'll get to it all in future chapters anyway.

At least you did start dealing with filling in the blanks a little more in chapter 3 than the few sparse clues that chapters 1-2 afforded. And it's better to do it this way, where information is doled out as it becomes relevant instead of dropping a bunch of dry exposition up front. Still, I'm 11k words in, and I still have only the vaguest idea of why Twilight's out here, why that's at odds with the rest of pony civilization, what she's hoping to accomplish, what she's risking by doing so... basically all of the elements that go into a story arc. It's clearly a story built on conflict, but that means defining the conflict, which means setting up what stakes everyone has in it, like: What does Twilight want? What is she willing to do to get it? What other things does she want that are competing for the same attention/resources? What bad thing happens if she fails to achieve her goal?

When a story is built on conflict, as most are, it's a good idea to get to that conflict as quickly as possible. The only tension you have going is that Twilight is being pursued, but that's so nebulous, since I know very little about why. It'd be different if even she didn't know; that would hearken to the kind of plot common in horror, where some nameless, dreaded thing is coming after our protagonist, and she has no clue as to its intentions or motivations. But here, she does. She's just keeping it from us. For 11k words, so far.

Otherwise, it's a good story, and it only has a few recurring writing issues that aren't even very hard to deal with. You're pushing it on keeping the reader in the dark over the whole reason for the story's existence. Now, if you were just about to get to that part, then I'd like to see that chapter before making a final decision. Or if you hadn't planned on it, then I think the reader needs a little more to go on in these early chapters.

All I've been able to figure out is that some disaster occurred on Twilight's planet, a lot of ponies blamed her for it to the point there was a real chance of her being sent to trial over it, but any sore feelings among the other princesses have since abated. They want her to come home. It's unclear exactly what actually did happen and who was at fault, and whether any of the rest of the population wants her back. It's also unclear why she fled—out of fear of what they'd do to her or just because she felt so horrible about everything that she needed solitude. Amid bouts of melancholy, she's actually pretty upbeat, and she doesn't at all seem to fear her pursuers. So everything's pretty vague, and there's no immediate danger. Aside from some intriguing world-building, that's not a strong hook, especially when I don't know much more three chapters in.

This is a good idea for a story, the writing's rather good. It just lacks definition of what it's actually about and is light on tension pushing it forward.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1915

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>nigh-invariably//

You're telling this story from Dash's perspective, so the narrative voice ought to fit what would be reasonable for her to think or say, in vocabulary, mannerisms, personality, and intelligence level. This doesn't seem like a phrase she'd use.

>taken up to drawing//

Of "up" and "to," only one is needed. Either one will do.

>She’d had it for almost a year, now,//

You don't need that first comma.

>She looked over her shoulder at it and flexed it one more time.//

Double spacing between sentences is fine, but this is one of the potential problems with it. On my screen, FiMFic has put the line break between the two spaces, so it looks slightly indented.

>“Focus”.//

>done”.//
Period goes inside the quotes.

>Every pegasus began hovering just over their clouds//

Each pegasus has only one cloud, right?

>cacophony//

>russet//
A couple more word choices that wouldn't seem to suit Dash well.

>That had been a good day.//

In the middle of an action scene isn't a good place to go on a long tangent or flashback. It kills the mood that things are happening quickly. Better to save this reminiscence until she has time to take a breather.

>but he could never hide all of them, “updates” would often introduce new weak spots//

Comma splice.

>and the helmet’s brainwashing have broken//

Missing word.

>stayed intact enough to stay//

Beware of repeating words in a close space like this.

>You-//

>H-how did-//
I won't mark any more of these, so scan the story for them, but please use a proper dash for cutoffs and asides, not a hyphen.

>could only see the pegasi at any distance when lightning cracked and she could see//

>started clearing. Dash started//
Repetitive phrasing again.

>who genuinely supported Sombra//

You just used "supported" in the last paragraph, too.

>he would’ve said that he and Dash would hold them off//

That's pretty much exactly what she did say, out loud. You don't need to repeat it.

>barreled//

Given that you just described two barrel rolls, this gets repetitive.

>Dash lost it.//

You're taking a very conversational tone with your narration, so it's definitely a limited narrator. So why is that personal voice gone here? If she lost it, make the narration sound like she's losing it. She essentially is the narrator, so have the narration reflect her mood.

>“Smile,” hissed Dash, and bit down on the trigger.//

Look how long it took that weapon to charge after shooting Spitfire. And it's already charged again, right after shooting Soarin?

>newly-crystallized//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases that start with an -ly adverb.

>Dash tried to talk to one of the other prisoners and was given a swift buck in the ribs. She tried again and was given two swift bucks in the ribs. So much for that.//

This is probably the biggest issue with the story. You're clearly using a very limited narrator, as in the last sentence I excerpted here. But so much of the time, your narration is very emotionless. The whole point of using a narrator this limited is because you can really get into the meat of how the character feels. But here, we just get the facts about her getting kicked in the ribs. Not wondering what's going to happen to her, not the pain it causes, not concern for her fellow prisoners. Surely those kinds of things are going through her head (or body, as the case may be). So why don't we get to witness any of it?

>particularly when it came to sweet stuff cupcakes and pies//

Missing a word or a comma or something.

>One who led rather dictated.//

Missing word.

>She hopscotched around her mind, strengthening the important parts when they weren’t being attacked.//

You pretty much already said that. But again, her description of this process is so factual and bland. Put some emotion into it. What do her motivations mean to her? When she's thinking about them, what kind of physical sensations does it cause? What images go through her mind? When he's spending time with her memories, which ones does she linger on? Just a brief one-sentence anecdote of a couple would bring this alive. Demonstration and example speak far louder than generalities.

>Not wanting to break her charade//

It's also better to avoid spelling out motivations like this. It will be apparent through her actions if you write it well.

>pay attention to him. But Dash counted and breathed and paid no attention to him//

More repetition.

>DoN’t YoU dArE//

If Sombra is that aware of what she's doing and in communication through the helmets, why can't he warn anyone?

>in excitement and impatience//

Prepositional phrases that impart emotion like this are rarely a good idea; furthermore, they're almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence, like her bouncing on her hooves.

>drove the pike straight through the back of the general, her weight pushing it out her belly on the other side and driving//

More repetition.

> little bit of work pulled it back out, glistening with blood, and Dash brought it down one, two, three more times, just to be sure.//

Again, she sounds all but emotionless about this. Wouldn't she get a lot of satisfaction about this? And some other feelings, too... Your limited narrator should give us direct access to her mind, yet she rarely emotes through the narrative tone. If she's excited, have the narrator shout. If she's confused, have the narrator fumble for words. If she's confused, have the narrator ask a pertinent question. It's not just what the narrator says, but how he says it.

>rapidly-growing//

No hyphen.

The ending's a little weak. She seems more focused on putting on a show than actually completing her mission. Like for Soarin, whom she'd seen plummet from the sky, for instance. It's not a bad place in the action to end the story, but it's fairly off-topic in the sentiment. Try to give that a tweak so it feels like it's giving closure to the story's action and theme.

Really, the only pervasive problem I see is that the limited narration is barely making itself known. It does take a personal voice and a conversational tone, but it loses those right when it needs them most, when the story comes to an emotional moment. The strength of that narrative voice is in having raw emotion show through its tone, but you're really keeping it factual. That forces a pretty big distance between the character and the reader, which is contrary to the choice of limited narration. And when a limited narrator feels so emotionally distant, it can make for a dull read.

It's a good story otherwise, and I'd like to see you get a handle on that so I can post it. It'd really ramp up the emotional impact and take a good story to the next level. If you have any questions, please ask. It's a matter of adding to what you have, not rebuilding it, and I think you're capable.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1925

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>rolling a lone tumbleweed between the two//

I guess by "two," you're referring to Pinkie and her target? It's kind of vague.

>dust covered//

You're using the whole phrase as an adjective, so hyphenate it.

>Having made her calculations, Pinkie’s tail twitch was the only warning her adversary would get as she sprang at it with the force of a cannon.//

Pinkie's tail twitch made her calculations?

>Imagining her hoof going straight through//

Except for the one-word paragraph, every one so far has started with a participial element. That gets rather repetitive, and you don't want t reader having that as their first impression. It's also the type of sentence starter that John Gardner particularly decries in his The Art of Fiction. I don't know that I'd go that far, but it is something that authors of moderate experience tend to overuse. To wit, you have 15 participial structures in the first screen alone.

>*SMACK!*//

Don't put sound effects in narration like this. Maybe first person would be a gray area, but for third? Just describe the sound.

>She got up, and threw herself at it again//

You do this a lot, where you put an unnecessary comma in a compound predicate.

>it’s surface//

Its/it's confusion.

>Applejack waited a for her response//

Some extraneous or missing words in there.

>A small shiver visibly passed through Pinkie, but there was no further response from the usually restless mare.//

You're making an odd shift from Pinkie's perspective to Applejack's here.

>t//

Extraneous character.

>laid several weak blows into the surface of the rock//

You just used almost the same phrase a bit ago.

>I’m supposed to be able to smash it with my hooves if I want but for some reason I just... can’t//

Missing your end punctuation. And you do this occasionally as well, where you actually need a comma, since you have multiple clauses.

>How was she supposed to respond to that.//

Isn't that a question?

>You didn’t think I came out here to buck apples did you?//

Needs a comma.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You'll have to force it the right way. Keep your eyes open for these.

>Then the full weight of what Applejack had just suggested dawned on her.//

So you start the scene in Pinkie's head, switch to Applejack's once she appears, then flip back to Pinkie for the last paragraph? It's a good idea to keep a narrator more stable than that, particularly in a story this short. You can make smooth transitions, but you have to ask yourself whether they're really necessary, and you generally don't have the luxury of doing so very much unless you're working with the space afforded you in a novel.

>A cloud of dust had been kicked up into the air and//

You pretty much already said that in this scene.

>her hooves imitated the sound of a jackhammer//

And you pretty much said the same thing last scene. You're repeating an awful lot of phrasing and imagery so far.

>“Hi, Pinkie Pie,” Maud said//

Why would Maud use her own sister's last name?

>“Ugh, fine.//

One too many or one too few line breaks here.

>Applejack squinted from behind her pointed hoof at the new rock.//

Missing words.

>Limey!//

You're inconsistent about italicizing question marks and exclamation marks on italicized words.

>Her pink mane snapped back to it’s usual volume//

Its/it's confusion.

>"Do you think we should tell her?"//

For some reason, this mini scene uses a different style of quotation marks. And I have no idea what Limestone means here.

You actually had a moral going here, but there are a few holes in it. First, Pinkie implies that she used to know how to break rocks. Heck, even Limestone implies that. So it's not that she just needs to accept that she's a party planner and not a rock smasher. She actually was a rock smasher and whatever reason she can't do it anymore isn't addressed. It just gets dropped. And then at the end when Pinkie wants to learn apple bucking, she makes the same argument as why Applejack should be able to learn rock smashing: they're earth ponies, so they should have the ability. Yet the story shows that to be false when Pinkie couldn't break the rocks.

Aside from that, there are the problems I already mentioned with repetition and shifting perspective.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1926

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>though Aria didn’t do anything different//

Unclear whether you mean she didn't do anything different than Adagio, or she didn't do anything different than her normal routine.

>just didn’t care, so she just//

Watch repeating a word in a close space like that. This word in particular is one many authors overuse.

>Adagio had been forced to quit her job//

Why? And you described her as sitting around watching TV all the time. When was she working?

>but what did bother her was that she didn’t know what Aria did for a living//

You've had a couple hints so far, but the story mostly floated around in a nebulous perspective until this. You'll want to establish right up front that Sonata is your limited narrator.

>Oh, how the mighty had fallen.//

And if Sonata is your limited narrator, you'll want it to sound like her. She comes across as pretty airheaded in the movie, and this doesn't sound like the kind of thing she'd say. So there are two common paths to go with this kind of thing: make the narration sound more or less like the way she speaks in the movie, or demonstrate why what we see of her in the movie doesn't reflect how she really is inside. Maybe she's smart enough, but only after she's had time to think things through, and in the movie, she kept getting put on the spot and drawing a blank. Or maybe she puts it on as an act for some reason. She either needs to sound like her canon self, or we need to see the dotted line getting to this characterization of her from her canon one.

>She was worried about Adagio’s lifestyle, and was even more worried about Aria.//

It's generally not a good idea to feed stuff like this directly to the reader. Let the reader figure it out from clues. Take the questions Sonta goes on to ask after this. They already create the mood, so it wasn't necessary for you to say this.

>Who cares? I can pay for everything now, so just do what you want.//

It's getting confusing what italics mean. Last time, they were Sonata's internal thoughts (more on that in a second). This time, it's remembered dialogue, I guess? Just indicate this was something Aria said. Now back to those direct thoughts. You already have a narrator who can speak Sonata's thoughts for her, so why present those previous ones essentially as quotes? These ones here:
>Is she getting money legally? What if she’s a drug dealer? Or worse? I keep reading about teenagers getting into drugs from the magazines, so it must be true!//
That forces a middleman between Sonata and the reader. There are ties where it's advantageous to have the thoughts be worded as first person, but I don't see the need here. Why not have this as regular narration (converted to third person past tense, of course)?

>In fact, it was Adagio who did the ordering. Sonata missed the old days already.//

You mean Adagio used to? Because she isn't now.

>made sure she didn’t make//

More repetition.

>symbols she didn’t understand//

Describe a couple. An example or two will speak far louder than any number of generalities.

>Checking to see if Aria had left her door open//

Also beware spelling out a character's reasons for doing something. This is already apparent through her actions. You don't need to say it.

>She immediately inserted the key, which fit perfectly, into the door lock. When she turned it and heard a clicking sound, she quickly entered the room and closed the door behind her.//

It's possible to be too detailed. If you want to describe things and create a visual of the setting, that's fine. Or if you want to create atmosphere. But giving unadorned blow-by-blow details of things the reader will assume anyway, you're just padding word count to no effect. Either cut out the unimportant stuff and suffice it to say she unlocked the door and went in, or give me something to make this level of detail interesting. This is an intermittent problem.

>What was more surprising//

This is your 3rd use of "surprise" in just 5 paragraphs. But this one actually works, since you call attention to the repetition. That's how to create an effect. I'd recommend cutting the first one, though.

>She pressed a key and the computer brought up the password screen.//

Note how you have two different subjects that don't share any verbs (she pressed... and... the computer brought...), so you'll normally want to put a comma between the clauses.

>Sonata couldn’t help but frown, and placed her head down on the desk.//

And here's the opposite issue. Sonata does both verbs, so it's all one clause and doesn't need a comma.

>some as old as a medieval era//

Odd phrasing with the indefinite article. There was only one medieval era, after all.

>She started to feel that her cause was lost.//

Look at all those times you had the narrator ask a question or exclaim something. That's how to have the narrator take on Sonata's mood. So do the same here. Demonstrate her emotion through the narrative tone instead of giving me a dry summary of it.

>Sonata noticed something on the door.//

You use "notice" 4 times pretty close together in this scene. But to make a larger point, there are a class of verbs related to perceiving or thinking (like know, want, wish, wonder, hear, see, feel, taste, etc.) that it's rarely necessary for a limited narrator to use. It's already implicit that Sonata effectively is the narrator, so they have the same experience. If the narrator describes something, it's understood that Sonata sees it. If there's something Sonata can't see, the narrator can't describe it. So just say there was something on the door. It automatically means Sonata noticed it, and then you haven't forced a step of perspective between her and the reader.

>some writings//

Kind of an awkward way to phrase that.

>To her surprise, it was tomorrow.//

More surprise, huh? This is also the kind of thing you should consider bringing into the narrative mood. Rather than say she's surprised, why not make the narrator sound surprised?

>was surely wasn’t//

Something got jumbled there.

>She then noticed Aria’s hands carrying large, unlabelled plastic bags.//

Awkward to attribute that to her hands. This is just pretty unnatural sounding.

>Aria looked and sounded annoyed.//

So describe how she looks and let me make my own judgment. Think about an actor who wants you to think his character is annoyed. What would he do? Not just say he was. He'd get you to interpret his behavior and appearance. Try to get your written characters to do the same.

>which made her flinch//

The phrasing makes this lose its immediacy. It feels like an afterthought, not something concurrent with the slam.

>her phone’s WiFi thingy//

This is what I was talking about earlier. This sounds consistent with how Sonata speaks in the movie. Contrast it with the earlier excerpt where I said it sounded kind of advanced for her.

>but she didn’t want to make the bill bigger than it already was//

Does she know how big it is? Or is Aria the only one who sees it?

>which made Sonata curious as to her whereabouts//

So instead of saying this outright, why not have the narrator ask where Adagio might have gone?

>what mattered was what Aria was doing for a living//

But why does it matter? All you've done so far is have Sonata wonder. Is she afraid that Aria will disappoint her by doing something immoral? Or does she fear for Aria's safety?

>just gave a smirk that Sonata always recognized, and Aria just//

Repeating that word again. You have 43 of them in the story, which is quite a bit for this word count.

>The image made her smile a bit//

She did this only a paragraph ago.

>Smile for camera//

Missing word.

>Not only because she couldn’t go to the specified address due to lack of transportation//

Very clinical description. Put some emotion behind this.

>the Canterlot High School//

You don't need to put "the" in front of that.

>She buried her face on her hands.//

in

>music; Electronic//

Don't capitalize after a semicolon.

>as she made awkward steps//

You sure chose the right word. Would you actually ever describe someone walking as "making steps"?

>my friend’s life is at stake here//

She has no proof of that. She doesn't even have any evidence of it. Aria hasn't been acting like she's frightened. And Sonata hasn't even expressed this fear before.

>Pulling her keys out from her skirt, she unlocked the car.//

What time of day is this? Is Vinyl just going to cut classes? Also note that participles mean that things happen at the same time, but she couldn't unlock the door until after she'd pulled the keys out.

>aside— Aria’s//

Don't leave a space after an em dash.

>The DJ nodded and started the car.//

So Vinyl doesn't know this girl at all, only that she recently tried to take over the school, and she's willing to take a two-hour trip each way for her? That's a huge favor. Why would she do this?

>After a few turns and directions//

Another really awkward phrasing.

>it was a prototype where the shifts were in the steering wheel//

A transforming car would predate paddle shifters or even an automatic transmission?

>as she was missing her show/

They have DVDs, but she can't record a show?

>It made her wonder why they would do that without putting stores beside them.//

As long as she'd been there, she never encountered a road without stories? And she never saw anything like that in Equestria either? It's weird that this is such an alien concept to her.

>“You know, I’m pretty worried, too.”

Then why was Adagio so mad?

>she recognized the emotion it displayed: regret//

Don't tell me that. Paint a picture and get me to interpret it that way.

>What does ‘profound’ mean//

Another spot where you hew closer to her movie characterization, in contrast to the kind of advanced diction you have her narration use at times.

>Sonata started pointing at the buildings and compared which ones looked funny or stupid.//

Again, a few examples will bring this alive much more than a vague statement.

>she just decided to give Sonata her moment, even if it was silly. She was just glad they were done looking at roads and billboards//

You've spent the whole story in Sonata's perspective so far. Why are you shifting over to Adagio's?

>Sonata liked the fact that there were a lot of people dressing up, but Adagio didn’t appreciate it; she just thought they all looked weird.//

You're speaking from both perspectives in the same sentence.

>dressed-up people//

There's a lot of repetitive phrasing with regard to this.

>delight when she saw her favorite shows’ merchandise all around her, but her delight//

More repetition, and again, instead of telling me she feels this way, demonstrate it.

>Sonata ended up buying so many plushies and toys//

She was lamenting how little money she made. How can she afford all this? And how can she justify blowing her money that way when Aria supports her?

>miss Aria Blaze//

When attached to a name like that, "Miss" would be capitalized.

>Sonata felt sad for Aria.//

Don't just say she feels sad. Convince me she does, get me to feel sad for her. I'll be much more sympathetic when I see her acting sad or the narrator taking a sad tone than if I only know she is.

>thanks kid//

You intermittently miss commas for direct address.

>white skinned//

Hyphenate.

>another applause//

"Applause" is a collective noun. It's like saying he gave her "another money."

>almost uncontrollably//

Don't get all maudlin. Where emotions are concerned, less is often more. If you make a caricature out of it, then it's a lot harder to take seriously.

You kind of dropped the thread about Vinyl. She's apparently some bigwig there, but we never found out why, and it never concerns Sonata that the lost track of her. For all Sonata knows, Vinyl's her only way of getting home, after all.

I've got a few common topics summarized at the top of this thread, and a number of them would apply here, but the one I especially want to point out, even though I've already discussed it some, is the one on "show versus tell."

This wasn't a bad story. It just had a few pervasive problems. One other I'll mention is that these girls don't act toward each other with the thinly veiled loathing they showed in the movie. It's entirely possible to have it different, but then the task becomes making the change reasonable. So give me a couple quick anecdotes, worked in at opportune places, to show how their attitudes changed after their defeat. Or maybe that the hostility was just a superficial affectation they put on, and they actually cared about each other all along. Just something to reconcile how they act here with how they do in the movie.

There's a nice arc to it, and there's a strong resolution at the end, so it's more about making the perspective uniform and being more subtle with the emotional cues.

Bleeding Rain!DROPScczL2Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1935

File: 1458183611535.png (203.36 KB, 644x427, 132631865894.png)

>>1925
>I guess by "two," you're referring to Pinkie and her target?
I can't imagine what else could be meant by that, though looking over it again I do see your point. I'll make some changes.

>Pinkie's tail twitch made her calculations?

Yowza! I didn't even notice that. Nice catch.

>To wit, you have 15 participial structures in the first screen alone.

Really? I count three. Perhaps you could help me to see that which I cannot.

>Just describe the sound.

I'm terribly sorry but I am well aware of how stigmatized onomatopoeia is around here and I am also well aware that there is no hard rule against it. I know what I did, and I fully intend to leave it there.

>you put an unnecessary comma in a compound predicate.

Those are really hard to catch when I go back through. Do you have an editor in mind who's good at that?

>You're making an odd shift from Pinkie's perspective to Applejack's here.

Odd how? Is there some rule against this?

>t//

>Extraneous character.
Can you point to some surrounding text? I'd rather not Ctrl+F[t] and scroll through the whole document.

>You just used almost the same phrase a bit ago.

the only repetitive word I can find is "blow" which I will admit is used a lot. Is there something else you were referring to that I've missed?

>you actually need a comma, since you have multiple clauses.

I'm beginning to believe I don't know enough about comma placement to polish this to the level you're asking for. Do you know of someone who does who might be willing to offer editing services?

>Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You'll have to force it the right way. Keep your eyes open for these.

I didn't understand that. Could you explain it another way?

>Switching POVs

Do you have a suggestion on how to make it smoother?

>>A cloud of dust had been kicked up into the air and//

>You pretty much already said that in this scene.
I think you're referring to <Her hooves made a gravelly sound in the coarse dirt, kicking up dust clouds that were swiftly whisked away in the soft breeze.> where I mentioned small clouds of dust to describe the dry ground. I made no mention of the enormous dust cloud off in the distance clearly created by something much larger than a hoof.

>You're repeating an awful lot of phrasing and imagery so far.

There's not a lot of different ways to describe the sound of a jackhammer, and it is supposed to be exactly the same action. Doesn't far proximity help mask repetitive phrasing?

>Why would Maud use her own sister's last name?

That is an excellent question. I was hoping Noelle Benvenuti and Nick Confalone could help us with that one.
>Pinkie Pie, what were you thinking?
>Makes me happy knowing Pinkie Pie has such good friends.
>I don't really like candy. But I do love Pinkie Pie.
> I'm so excited to see you, Pinkie Pie.
She obviously has a habit of assuming its just part of Pinkie's name.

>Applejack squinted from behind her pointed hoof at the new rock.//

>Missing words.
Perhaps I should reword it, but there's actually nothing missing. 'pointed' is an adjective here, not a past tense verb.

>You're inconsistent about italicizing question marks and exclamation marks on italicized words.

Could you point out more than just the one example? I can't see inconsistencies between multiple objects with just one object to observe.

>You actually had a moral going here, but there are a few holes in it.

That much wasn't obvious? I thought I'd explained it. She lacks the self confidence to break the rock. Yes, when she was younger she had it, and there was a brief period where she could have broken rocks if she wanted to, but she never did, because she left to be a baker/party planner and never looked back. In the first scene, she couldn't do it because she was doubting herself. At the end, she probably could have, but Big Mac smashed the rock she was going to and she never picked out a new one.
The story doesn't prove Pinkie's theory false, you just have to read between the lines.

Thanks for the feedback. A lot of these are silly errors that I'll definitely work on if I can find an editor who's better at this than I am.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1946

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Sunset loved Winter//

Why? Give me a little description. Otherwise, it's an empty fact.

>stress inducing//

You're using the whole phrase as an adjective, so hyphenate it.

>smokings//

I've never heard the term before. What are these?

>throwing herself into multiple after school activities//

Even a couple of short examples will speak far louder than a broad statement like this.

>judgemental//

judgmental

You have 8 paragraphs of exposition to begin the story, broken up only by one thing that's happening at the present time, and even then it's completely narrated: Sunset noticing that the girls are commenting on the dresses. It's almost 1k words on the nose (1003, to be exact), or almost the first 10% of the story. This is not a good way to start.

For one, it's mostly information that the reader already knows or would have assumed anyway. Second, nothing happens. The story stagnates.The reader's here to see things happen and see new things about the characters. Get to those as quickly as possible.

This is fine for establishing Sunset's situation, but you don't have to go through all of it right now. Give me just enough to get the gist of it, then work in the rest little by little as it becomes relevant to what's going on. It's a lot easier to take exposition in a lot of small doses than one large block.

>Sunset decided to set her phone down on her bedside table for now and lay back on her bed//

>She laid there//
Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs.

>Twilight let Spike down before she entered, and the dog bolted into the kitchen as if he was on a mission.//

This paragraph and the one following it are still very expository. At least you're weaving it in with current happenings now, but the issue here is that the exposition isn't even very relevant. What difference does it make that Sunset likes dogs? Does it matter that Sunset doesn't want to pay for cable? It's really important for any exposition you give to actually achieve something significant. Is it information that will have a big effect on how the reader understands the story? Is there no other way to present it? Take this excerpt, for example. If Twilight says something like: "Hey, you still have those dog treats I left here last study night?" then it implies a lot of things without you having to explain them outright, and it does so through another medium than narration. Even if you'd done it as narration, like: "Sunset dug out the bag of dog treats Twilight had left behind on their last study night." then it's tied as a qualifier on a current action, not completely some statement of past events.

>cussion//

cushion

>as she sat down and pouted a little as she noticed her pajamas//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence like this. It's overkill on the synchronization.

>embarrassedly//

Really try to avoid words or phrases like this that tell the reader how someone does something. Paint a picture instead. What body language would indicate that she was embarrassed? What facial expression?

>pike jumped up on Twilight’s lap and turned to Sunset, wagging his tail excitedly//

There's another one of those blunt emotional words. The big ones to avoid using much are moods or emotions as adjectives (he was sad), adverbs (he walked happily), and prepositional phrases (he sighed in relief). I'mnot going to mark any more of these, but there are a bunch of them throughout the story. Also, this is after Friendship Games, so why doesn't Spike talk?

>She trailed off//

You don't need to tell me she trailed off when it's already punctuated as if she did.

>she looked at the other girl//

The camera's been hovering over Sunset's shoulder, so it's a bit odd to see the narrator refer to her as "the other girl."

>After a couple months, Twilight had felt comfortable enough to come clean to the girls about her sexuality.//

And Sunset just completely forgot about it?

>judgement//

judgment. Just look for these on your own.

>She’d forgotten all about it, because she’d never seen Twilight interested in any girls… or anyone, for that matter.//

But she managed to recall it awful quickly. Besides, why would failing to see it in action mean she didn't know anymore?

>chocked it up//

chalked

>Sassy,” Twilight rolled her eyes//

You've punctuated that like a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

I'll step out here and note something that just elicits an eye-roll from me. I won't make you change it, but it's improbable to the point of being ridiculous. Of these 7 girls, at least 6 are either bisexual or lesbian?

>wondering what Pinkie could see in that snobby girl//

Why are you switching over to Twilight's perspective?

>I would-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs. This is a recurring problem.

>little more, and her smile faded a little//

Watch repeating words so close together like that.

>Twilight noticed Sunset’s smile faded//

Missing word.

>She didn’t know why, but she did know Sunset had been intentionally avoiding the dance//

Your perspective is wavering a lot around here.

>looked down, refusing to look//

More close repetition. I'm not going to keep marking these.

>It’s pleated skirt//

Its/it's confusion.

>I never did like dresses all that much?//

Is that really a question?

>The smile gave way to an expression of concern//

Keep in mind you're using Twilight as your perspective character for this scene. This isn't describing her internal emotion. It's describing an external evaluation of her facial expression, which creates two problems: one, she can't see her own face to evaluate it (there are certain things she wouldn't need to see to know she was doing, like gaping), and two, more immediate would be the feelings behind the expression, since they're hers.

>his head//

Extraneous space.

There's an awful lot of giggling going on in this story.

>‘honk’//

You don't need to put that in quotes. It's a valid word.

>Cadence’s called from downstairs//

Cadence's what?

>Any thoughts that had floating around Twilight’s head//

Missing word.

>she shook the thought aware//

Typo.

>how different was//

Missing word.

>get up//

In that sense, it's one word.

>though she sounded more dejected this time than insistent//

But Twilight's holding the perspective. Why would she remark about how she sounds instead of how she actually feels?

>ya’//

>wanna’//
>kinda’//
>gonna’ //
No need for an apostrophe on those.

>“C’mon, Twi. Lighten up. I think they’re great. Cadence is funny.//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

>tisked//

tsked

>you. ”//

Extraneous space.

>ask,” Twilight started, “What’s//

The way you're punctuating that, the quote is all one continuous sentence, so why are you capitalizing in the middle of it?

>twenty minute//

You're using this whole phrase as an adjective for "drive," so hyphenate it.

>The redhead was absolutely sure she’d be sore in the morning.//

Now you're jumping over to Sunset's perspective.

>Yoyu//

Huh?

>‘cause//

Smart quotes always get apostrophes backward on the beginning of a word. You can paste one in the right way. Keep an eye out for these.

>Pinkie rose an eyebrow.//

Raise/rise confusion.

>As if on queue//

cue

>camaro//

That's a proper noun.

>I don’t really like her… or trust her//

Why not?

>She just seemed had//

Jumbled wording.

>Sunset caught up to her quickly and matched her pace//

Wait. Twilight has her by the hand. Why does she need to catch up. She should already b there with her.

>It looked even better before//

Don't you mean "better than before"? Otherwise, you're saying it looks worse now.

>self loathing//

Hyphenate.

>far off stare//

In this usage, "far-off."

>a several couples//

Extraneous word.

>stuck up//

stuck-up

>snobs//

Hm. She didn't say anything when Sunset told her Rarity was going with Trenderhoof.

>Lemon Zest and Indigo are going steady//

Man. Another one of these. You'd think there are no straight ponies around.

>where the Formal took place every year//

That's an oddly extraneous statement to tack on. The reader would assume this anyway, since that's where it takes place in the movie.

>Unfortunately,//

There's a huge space after this for some reason.

>I was coming Remember?//

Capitalization or punctuation is off.

>W-Well//

Only capitalize the first one. You've been getting that right, so this was probably just a typo.

>Sunset affirmed//

By now, I notice that you use a lot of unusual speaking verbs. Rather than type up the explanation here, I'll just refer you to the section on "sadisms" at the top of this thread.

>She had been trying to cheer her friend up//

And now you're jumping over to Fluttershy's perspective. There's a section up top about "head hopping" too, which explains. And I'll reiterate that it's not impossible to switch perspectives, but you have to do it smoothly, and you have to consider whether it's really necessary. Here, for instance, we don't learn anything from going to her perspective that we couldn't from staying in Sunset's. If Sunset notices her acting frightened at the outburst, then the same emotional information is imparted, but you didn't need to leave Sunset's perspective to get it. You actually started the scene in Twilight's perspective, but it's been feeling closer to Sunset lately. But right after this, you definitely go into Twilight's.

>dance.Let’s//

Missing a space.

>your highness//

Honorifics like that get capitalized.

>Sunset grinned a little as she realized she was dancing with such a beautiful girl. Twilight stared back at her with a blush, stars in her eyes. She decided to let Sunset lead and set her free hand on Sunset’s shoulder.//

Now you're switching perspectives within a single paragraph.

You're really using a lot of -ly adverbs lately. In fact, there are a lot throughout the story. Now, it's not fair to rule out an entire part of speech or to dismiss its usage out of hand. So it's not intrinsically wrong to use so many, but you should ask yourself with each one how well it actually creates a mental picture. Normally, people work the other way: we see the person's appearance and behavior, and judge how they feel from that. So "awkwardly" can mean a lot of things. It's so imprecise that it doesn't immediately conjure a mental image. You basically require the reader to come up with their own. If instead you write about how a character keeps tripping over her own feet and fumbling for words, then I can picture that happening, and I'll conclude awkwardness from it. I get the same place you want me to, but with a much richer image.

>“Okay, okay. It will be fun,” she then followed the other girl to the drink table.//

That's not a speaking action, but you have it capitalized/punctuated like an attribution.

>Sunset didn’t even realized//

Typo.

>Later…//

This is a little awkward. Why not just put a scene break there?

>walked out the school//

Missing word.

>a brilliant display of fireworks painting the sky in a cacophony of colors//

"Cacophony" connotes something unpleasant. The root "caco-" is derived from Greek, literally meaning "bad." I don't think that's the effect you're going for.

>she leaned over to the center console and popped a different disk into her CD player.//

You're correct that the intervening aside here doesn't need to be capitalized. But it also doesn't take a period at the end (but ! or ? can be used, if appropriate).

>P!nk,” She said.//

Capitalization.

>‘So What’//

Why are you putting the song title in single quotes instead of doubles? Nobody's going to confuse it with dialogue, the way you have it set up.

>If I wasn’t around, you’d make fun of that dorky dancing of yours?//

I think you meant "who'd."

>say, ‘see?//

Capitalization.

>deserved’.//

Period would go inside the quotation mark here.

>Everyday//

This word means "routine." You want "every day."

>understanded//

understood

>Except, Twilight//

It's rare that you'll actually need a comma after a conjunction. This one shouldn't be there.

>she hesitated for a moment, trying to find the words,//

Another spot where you're trying to use a non-speaking action as a dialogue tag.

>“I was going to ask you the same thing,” Twilight answered with a giggle.//

Maybe I'm just missing something, but Twilight's monologue went on long enough that I forgot what question this is referring to. I scrolled back a bit to have a glance, but I couldn't find one.

>she sighed and closed her eyes.//

Capitalization.

>I’m glad that I never did, because I can’t think of anyone I’d rather have this conversation with.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>nothing, turning her look to out the window at nothing//

I haven't been marking them, but I'm seeing numerous places like this where you repeat a word in a close space.

>H-Hey//

Only capitalize the first one.

>os something//

Typo.

>right?” She asked//

Capitalization.

The final paragraph doesn't quite fit. For one, it tries to occupy both their perspectives. But it also sounds very trite, which undermines the serious tone, and it makes a weak attempt at following up with what happens in the future, and it's just an unsatisfying job of it. It's fine to leave things open. They've decided they want to try a relationship, and it'll go where it goes. You don't have to follow that thread any further. The story should have thematic closure, but it doesn't have to have plot closure. Honestly, you could cut this whole paragraph. The one-liner before that makes a very nice ending note.

So I'll reiterate the main points:
-scattered editing issues
-lots of word and phrase repetition
-jumpy perspective

I want to expand on that last one a bit, now that I'm at the end. The simplest way is to keep to a single perspective per scene. If you do have important information to relate that can only be shown from two different perspectives, then it's fine to do so. But you don't want to transition between them too often or too abruptly. Here's the logic behind it.

Too often: The longer a reader gets settled into a character, the more he will identify with them. So if he keeps getting shuttled back and forth, it's tough to get to know the characters. So if it's worth shifting from one character to another, then it's worth staying there for a while before shifting again. It can be disorienting and unsatisfying to switch to another character, only to spend one or two sentences with them before coming back. This will depend somewhat on the type of narrator. An omniscient one can readily dip into any character's head on a whim, but needs to keep things factual. They can have a perspective, in that they may favor one character, follwing her around and focusing on what she sees and does and generally keeping her as the main character. But it can switch whenever it wants. A limited narrator does have to stay with one character at a time and can't say things that character has no way of knowing or perceiving. Limited narrators can still sound pretty close to omniscient ones if they stick to factual information, and if you're on this end of the spectrum, it's easier to change perspective. But limited narrators can also take on a very personal voice, expressing the character's train of thought as narration and essentially becoming the character. In this case, they can sound conversational (ask questions, get interrupted, trail off, etc.) and take on that character's voice (mannerisms, vocabulary, intelligence level, etc.). This is a type that can be really jarring to switch too frequently, because it means frequent shifts in how the writing itself sounds, like using lots of "awesome"s in one paragraph of Dash's perspective, then switching to "what in tarnation" the next paragraph for Applejack. What's probably the biggest reason, though, is that the reader has to have a feel for whose opinions and feelings the narration represents. It's a lot of work when he has to keep re-evaluating that every few sentences. And it's all but forbidden to have multiple perspectives within a single paragraph.

Too abruptly: Take that last example. Now imagine the narrator goes from using "awesome" in one sentence to using "what in tarnation" in the very next sentence. The reader's going to do a mental double-take before realizing what you've done. And in a less obvious instance, he may not realize you've changed perspective and be interpreting the story through the wrong eyes. Anyway, if you've determined that you do need to execute a perspective switch, it needs to be done smoothly. Think of a camera zooming out of one character and in on another. Tight focus is like a very limited narrator, and wide focus is like omniscient narration. So if you have the narrator shouting on Dash's behalf because she's excited, then take another couple of sentences to back off from her perspective until you're relaying only factual information and in a neutral voice. Then likewise take a couple of sentences to ease into the new perspective. Maybe an example would help. Here's a sample transition from Scootaloo's perspective to Diamond Tiara's. So it starts with a very opinionated statement expressing Scootaloo's thoughts as if the narrator's own. Then it fades back into making only a factual statement over a few sentences. Then there's a paragraph break, since you want Diamond Tiara's perspective to be in a separate paragraph. Then we slowly take on a more personal voice to the sentences and relate things more explicitly internal to Diamond Tiara until the narrator is speaking her thoughts for her:

>Ugh. When would Diamond Tiara ever leave Scootaloo alone about her wings? Couldn't she go off with Silver Spoon or something? She glared back, but Diamond wouldn't budge an inch. So Scootaloo huffed a sigh and walked off.


>The lunch bell rang, so everypony made their way to the picnic tables outside for lunch. Diamond Tiara took her usual spot, but nopony else joined her. At first anyway. Oh good! Here came Silver Spoon, and she had on the most adorable pendant. How had Diamond missed that earlier?


That at least shows how to do a smooth transition, but of course, without further context, it's impossible to know whether both of their perspective were giving vital information that couldn't be relayed any other way. There is at least a motivation to execute a switch: Scootaloo leaves, but I need the camera to stay behind. If you're using a narrator with a very personal voice, it's also important to keep that voice going. If you lapse into a stretch of factual statements, it makes the narration sound like it's becoming omniscient, even if you don't intend it to, and it can make the reader lose his feel for the character. So you do have to put in little things here and there to keep reminding the reader that it's a limited narration and whose perspective it represents.

In all, the writing's not bad here, and I do appreciate that the ending was kind of low-key in a way that avoids the cliches of the story ending with one working up the courage to ask the other out, or a couple's first kiss, or a wedding. You do have those first two in the story, but they weren't the point of the story. The ending set up a future open to interpretation that begins with that date and kiss; the date and kiss themselves weren't the story's point. So you're already doing something to stand out from the crowd, which is especially important in romances.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1959

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I'm sure some ponies would see this stuff as treasure, we had solid wooden furniture//

Comma splice.

>Yeah, y'all heard me right//

So far, when she's used "you," it was in a generic sense, just a manner of speaking, not actually addressing someone specific. But here she does. This is probably a can of worms you don't want to open. When you explicitly have an audience, then it's another character that needs defining. Who's she talking to? Why does she want to tell him this story? Why does he want to listen? Under what circumstances is she telling him? It'd be far easier to avoid all this, unless you feel like taking it on.

>There as a note in the back cover.//

>It wasn't very often I fond myself knocking at the door to Rarity's boutique.//
Typo.

>Talk to me Applejack.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>The Ghost Next

Door//
Why is there a line break in the middle of this? And put book titles in italics.

>I'm afraid I don't understand dear.//

Direct address again. I can see this might become a recurring issue. When one character calls another by name, title, or reference, set it apart with a comma.

>I saw pity in her eyes.//

Let me see it, too, and it'll mean a lot more.

>she still look nervous//

Typo.

>I wasn't wincing about bodily changes, those were clearly beneficial.//

Comma splice.

>Dear Mr. and Ms. Apple//

It was "Mrs." before.

>Lands' sakes'//

Usually, land sakes, no apostrophes.

>Dear Mr. and Ms. Apple//

Again, it was "Mrs." the first time you showed the inscription.

>You should be very proud!" She read.//

Don't capitalize the dialogue tag.

>Look, Applejack, I get that you've had a hard life//

Well, you gt the direct address right this time. But every other time I've seen it, you didn't have any commas.

>Quite possibly yes dear, when was the last time you did something big because you wanted to do it?//

Another comma splice. I'm not going to mark any more, but you should scan for them. There are a fair amount scattered around.

>Ah do stuff like that all the time! I go to Pinkie's parties, I compete in rodeos..."//

Why does she use both "Ah" and "I"?

>and a cousin that couldn't compete//

When you're talking about a sentient being, you should use "who" instead of "that."

>Then closed//

Extraneous space.

>Well, you did lose something Applejack, you bottled up something you loved.//

Huh? She stopped reading because she was trans? That's... odd. And I dont suppose we're going to get an explanation of why she was shown as a filly in canon on two occasions when she was younger than you have her as still a colt (as a toddler in "Apple Family Reunion" and a newborn in "The One Where Pinkie Pie Knows"). It's not tagged as Alternate Universe, so I assume it's supposed to play well with canon.

>Oh my god//

What does that phrase mean in Equestria?

>'till//

When you spell it with two "l"s, it doesn't take an apostrophe.

>Oh I wished, Spike was here!//

Why is that comma there? With it, Twilight wishes something unspecified, and Spike is actually there.

>Oh lord//

Again, what would that mean in Equestria?

>it was way to crude/

Typo.

>She grit her teeth//

gritted

>And we both broke down. Peals of laughter filled the library. I almost couldn't breathe.//

See, this isn't exactly presented in a funny way, though. Twilight's narrating this to me, but she sounds so factual. She's not commenting on how absurd the situation is, her narration isn't struggling to speak through the laughter. It's just there as a fact.

>I guess I should have realized there'd be something incriminating in that crate//

I can't gauge whether she did this deliberately. I have to think so, because it'd be pretty ridiculous of her to forget that, given how much impact it's had on her day already. That box of books started it all, but it conveniently slipped her mind? Hard to buy. And assuming it was a calculated move, why would she even think that was necessary with Twilight?

>Could I-//

Please use a proper dash.

>heart rending//

You're using the whole phrase as an adjective, so hyphenate it.

>pockets?//

Most times you have a question mark or exclamation mark on an italicized word, you ought to italicize it as well.

>putin'//

Typo.

>want's overalls//

Why is that apostrophe there?

>'well//

Capitalization, and you never closed that single quote.

>I-//

Again, please use proper dashes for asides or cutoffs. I won't mark any more.

>'gee//

>'so//
Capitalization.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>It feels more like I'm too much of a coward to try workin' towards the stuff I want and my past is a convenient excuse to not bother...//

This is all so vague, even though she's discussed it multiple times already. If you want me to identify with her, you need to start making the conflict more concrete pretty soon.

>I guess I'd like to read more? Maybe get some writing done?//

Well, at least you're being specific now, but this goes back to my earlier question: what about being trans is preventing her from reading? For that matter, she said in "Read It and Weep" that she enjoyed reading. Was she lying to cover herself? Or does this story take place before that?

>sugar cube//

AJ sure says that a lot in this chapter. Think about how often you actually call someone by name or nickname or whatever in a one-on-one conversation.

>South orchard//

Why is that capitalized?

>5//

Write out numbers that short.

>I know AJ//

I said I wouldn't mark any more of these, but let me explain it.
"I know AJ" means that she's acquainted with AJ.
"I know, AJ" means that she's telling AJ she knows something.

>getting research done."//

When one paragraph ends in dialogue and the next picks up immediately with more dialogue by the same speaker, convention is to leave the closing quotes off the first and of the earlier paragraph.

>happy go lucky//

Hyphenate.

>felt... Annoyed//

That's just continuing the same thought, so there's no need to capitalize as if you're starting a new sentence.

>my Mom//

It becomes more generic when you put something like "my" in front of it, and it doesn't warrant capitalization then. If it stood alone, it would, because you'd essentially be using it as a name.

>eight year old//

Hyphenate.

I'm through three chapters now, and it should be obvious what the recurring problems are. If I give this detailed a reading to the whole story, I'll be at this for a week and keep you waiting for significantly diminishing returns, so I'm going to give a quick read of the rest and note only new issues and any plot or characterization problems.

>rye-bread//

When you're just using the phrase as a noun, it doesn't take a hyphen.

>I'd never had much of a green thumb//

Or any other color, I would imagine, since ponies don't have thumbs...

It just helps a story look good on the page when there's less immediately obvious repetition, so just note that at the beginning of chapter 4, 6 of your first 9 paragraphs start with "I."

>I let out a breath I hadn't realized I was holding.//

This is very, very cliched.

>Pinky//

Typo.

>Sugarcube corner//

That's a proper noun.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

And now you're spelling it differently. Canon is "Sugarcube."

>The cakes//

You're talking about the family, right? So it's a name. Capitalize it.

>Ms. Cake//

She's married. You generally use this when you don't know or she prefers not to identify herself as married.

>stetson//

That's a proper noun. And it's not really the kind of hat she wears.

>45%//

Write it out.

>S-spike//

That's one time you actually do have to capitalize both parts of the stutter, because it's a name. Other than that, only do the first one. You intermittently miss these.

>transmorpher's reference//

No reason to have an apostrophe there, and that's a title or property, so it needs to be capitalized.

>You don't have a Stallion's body.//

That's just... random capitalization.

>book-shelves//

bookshelves

>Spike Raised//

What's with all the random capitalizations?

>a pre-emptive strikes//

Singular/plural mismatch.

>"You know what? Yes Applejack, yes I would."//

This comes out of nowhere. We've spent a not-insignificant amount of time with Twilight as a first-person narrator, and she never once considered the possibility or related that she found AJ attractive? Not that that would be enough, but it's a start. But it sounds like she's doing this on a whim, which sure comes across as insincere, like she feels obligated or put on the spot to prove she's not squicked out.

Thing is, we've also spent a lot of time with AJ as our first-person narrator, and not once has she voiced any kind of attraction to Twilight. The way to build up a romance is to show the two belong together, not just require the reader to take the author's word for it. So don't just spring this on the reader. And don't just stick a few references earlier in the story to how AJ has been sweet on Twilight for years. Demonstrate it. Have AJ remember some anecdotes of times she found Twilight adorable. Show me that they have compatible personalities. It's a relationship because they both bring things to the table that the other needs, not because "why the hell not?"

By chapter 6, I'm just not really marking the editing issues anymore. Suffice it to say you need some proofreading help.

>8:00//

Write it out.

>who doesn't have any education//

Wait, why wouldn't she? She's live in Ponyville all her life, and the schoolhouse was shown to exist at the time she was young. Apple Bloom's never said anything about being the first in her family to go to school. You're kind of stereotyping Applejack here in a way that's cliched.

>I know, I know, not very ladylike, but sometimes one needs to be blunt.//

Who's her audience for this? You haven't really done something like this since early in the first chapter.

>and for a moment she was more beautiful than I'd ever imagined//

And yet before asking her out, AJ never once described her as attractive. That's just another example of how this comes out of nowhere.

>"So, y'all hungry?"//

As a fully licensed southerner, I can say it's exceedingly rare to hear someone use "y'all" as a singular term.

>did she have delicious teats!//

Okay, you may be pushing the edge of what we can allow.

Really, all this "am I gay?" and "how do I tell everyone?" stuff has been done over and over again. It takes a fresh angle, and AJ being trans is kind of one... except that plot thread has been all but dropped. It was a tangential thing that seemed to be the main conflict early on in the story, but now it's become a very standard shipping story.

>all this LGBT stuff get's really confusing//

Why is that apostrophe there?

Why would Twilight as a first-person narrator refer to Cadence as "the pink alicorn" and "the embarrassed princess"? Do you typically think about your friends in similar terms?

>some slight attraction to that handsome empty head in the human world//

She does realize she's talking about one of her own guards, right?

>I would have been sending so many hot ladies your way!//

Because she's been sending so many hot stallions until now? This is just bizarre. She didn't give a rat's ass until she found out Twilight was gay, and now she wants to play matchmaker?

By chapter 11, you're really playing the slow game, which is the right thing to do, but contrast it with how fast the first two went. Twilight finds out Applejack likes mares and is instantly in love with her? That just doesn't pass the sniff test.

Well, it's at least nice to see her trans status make a resurgence as a plot element, but it went absent for so long that it becomes very vague what her actual problem was.

There's an awful lot of blushing in this story. Not that it's the wrong reaction, but it makes things feel repetitive and unoriginal when you can't come up with other things to have them do.

>I gave her a troubled look.//

Why would he evaluate his own facial expression? The are some things he'd know about how he looks, but you don't think about your own expression this way. Why would he?

>Wrapped around a mare this beautiful who wouldn't.//

If you're saying what I think you're saying, you need a comma and a question mark.

>Earth//

You used an expression like this in an earlier chapter, I think, but at least you left it lower case then. This actually refers to our planet.

>cryopreserved semen samples before her transition//

Um... Again, she was shown as a filly when she was just a toddler in canon. So when exactly did she preserve that? I don't even want to think about doing that at that age... plus she'd be too young to make an informed decision, so did her parents...? Never mind. I don't want to think about that, either.

>And then we proceeded to do a large number of things I'm not going to tell you about.//

Tell who about? You haven't defined who I am to them, why he'd be talking to me, why I'd be listening.

Okay, finally done. Only took me about 7 nights to review it all. So, I'm not going to remember back that far, but it should be pretty obvious what the problems are. Basically, anything I had to mention multiple times.

When you're going to switch narrators this often, you really do need to make it immediately obvious who your perspective character is. In some scenes, you did within the first sentence or two, but other times, it'd go half a dozen paragraphs before I could tell who was speaking. There are a few perspective slips, quite a few editing problems, the pacing until they start dating is breakneck... You're going to be pretty hit or miss on the conflict, too, but that's just the nature of the beast. You clearly want the reader to be angry with Shining Armor, but honestly, I'd have done the same thing. He thought AJ was hiding something, he suspected his sister wouldn't be willing to listen to any reservations, he found out on his own, and decided it wasn't something he wanted to act on. I wouldn't call that a story flaw, but sometimes it takes a more nuanced argument to capture a general audience. But that's up to you.

The plot thread about her being trans didn't really pervade the whole story, though. It's immediately played as the central conflict, but then AJ doesn't actually care when ponies start finding out. Then she has issues with feeling feminine, and that's probably the strongest part of the conflict, since she actually struggles with it. Then at the end, she's getting angsty again, but absolutely nobody is against her on it, and she comes around without much effort, which just defuses things.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1975

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“Ten bits. ‘Twas was all, dearest, just 10 bits.” Rarity said//

Note the inconsistency in using numerals versus words for numbers. Words are preferred, up until it takes more than three of four of them to spell it out. Also not that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want an opening single quote. You can paste one in the right way, or if you type two in a row, the second will be correct, then you can erase the first. And when you transition from a quote to a dialogue tag, and the quote ends in a period, replace the period with a comma.

>held between the hooves of each of her charges//

You don't need the comma that precedes this. but if you want one there, you ought to pair it with one after this phrase.

>Mother of Pearl//

Why is that capitalized? It's not a proper noun.

>in it’s own deep dimple//

Its/it's confusion. The possessive form never has an apostrophe. "It's" means "it is" or "it has."

>believe enough //

Extraneous space.

>Cause//

That needs a leading apostrophe.

>Honey Crisp//

If you're going for the apple variety, it's a single word.

>had taught//

Another extraneous space. You might want to do a Ctrl-f for two consecutive spaces. Of course, if you're double-spacing after sentences, you're going to get a lot of hits. Actually, now that I check, you have both single and double spaces at times. Try to be consistent.

>your Mommy//

When you put something like "your" in front of it, it becomes generic, and it's not being used in place of a name anymore. Thus, it doesn't get capitalized. Compare to this one you had earlier, which is correctly capitalized: don’t forget, Mommy’s a princess too.

>My pleasure sweetie.//

>What’s the matter Aunt Rarity?//
You're lacking a lot of commas needed for direct address throughout the story.

>There was a touch of pain and worry there.//

I suspect this will be a recurring issue as well. Instead of directly telling me how a character feels, it's better to imply it through the kinds of detail I would notice if I were there observing her. If you see someone across the room at a restaurant, how do you know he's happy? He doesn't inform you. You can tell by how he looks and acts. Give the reader the same kinds of cues and let him figure it out on his own. This is how people naturally do it, so it feels more authentic than having the narrator feed me the conclusion.

>hair hair//

Repeated word.

>crusaders//

In their usage of it, this would be a proper noun.

>Her smile was uneven as her chin trembled//

There you go. It's evident how she's feeling, even though you haven't said how she feels. This way of describing it is also a lot easier to visualize.

>“I guess I miss those days more than I’d realized.” her voice barely a whisper.//

Your dialogue tag doesn't have a speaking verb.

>anytime - not//

Please use a proper dash. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>As the bits flow in//

You'll normally want to set off dependent clauses like this with a comma.

>others go to salaries others go to rent//

Missing comma.

>“I know,” smiled Misty, “They’re the best.//

By using commas on both sides of the tag, you're saying the quote is one continuous sentence, but if that's so, you've capitalized a word in the middle of it. Plus this is another non-speaking action used as n attribution. How do you smile a sentence?

>for for//

Repeated word again. Note that I'll only mark the first couple of times I see each kind of error. I'll leave you to find the rest.

>Evers//

Typo.

>over the years//

Pretty redundant with the "over" phrase that began the sentence.

>Misty’s voice was tiny and sad.//

Instead of telling me she's sad, show me how she looks so that I'll interpret her as such.

>The little unicorn’s voice was pained at the thought of her Mama crying like that.//

You're teetering on the edge here. Mostly, your narrator is factual, but on occasion, he does say something that only one character could know, and in those cases, it's consistently been things Rarity would know. So it seemed like you were taking her perspective, yet this gets at something Rarity couldn't know, at least as it's stated. She might figure this out, but she wouldn't know it as a fact.

>, -//

Don't use a comma in conjunction with a dash.

>Eve..//

Double punctuation.

>Mommy. “//

Extraneous space that's broken the smart quotes.

>live is such grandiose luxury//

Typo.

>Misty Dawn offered//

Missing punctuation.

>diamond encrusted tiara//

Put it in quotes. Well, single quotes, since it's inside another quotation.

>The both left//

Typo.

>her sisters hoof//

Missing apostrophe. Okay, suffice it to say you need a good proofreading sweep. I'm not going to mark any more editing issues or I'll be here all day.

>in order to emphasize the danger//

Just like with emotions, it's not a good idea to spell out a character's motivations like this.

>at the cottage of Zecora//

Why phrase that in such a roundabout way? What does this accomplish that "Zecora's cottage" wouldn't?

>“It ain’t that she needs more and I reckon it’s gonna sound silly but, well, I want to give her more.” your Mama explained to him.//

>“‘What do ya mean? Is this some kind of a riddle or something?’ your Mama asked him”.//
Note the inconsistency in how you present these, where Rarity is actually speaking the attribution. The second one is correct, except that the final period goes inside the quotes.

The formatting is beginning to be a bit of a drag here. I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to tell the story as a flashback, so that Rarity doesn't have to quote everything, ever her bits of narration, since she's presenting a lot of dialogue. That way, you could alternate scenes of the flashback as it happened with popping back to see the fillies react to it. Food for thought. What you have isn't wrong, but it's a bit cumbersome. Or instead of flashbacks, go into scenes where Rarity enters storyteller mode, essentially putting the reader into the fillies' place. She could speak directly to the reader as "you," and the narration is understood as spoken. Part of the issue with presenting it the way you did is that it feels very expository, and the conflict in the story is the part being summarized. If the story's true conflict turned out to be in the here and now, with these fillies, then there's be a good reason to avoid letting the past events take the forefront, but they're just an audience, so even though it's dialogue, a lot of the story's important details are being told through a form of narration after the fact. It loses a sense of immediacy that way and makes it feel less alive.

>Rarity looked at the excitement of the faces of the two fillies. Her heart ached to see it.//

Why does her heart ache to see excitement?

>and...now I- I gotta just …//

Inconsistent ellipsis formatting. The preferred one is to leave a space afterward, unless it starts a sentence.

Just so you know, if one paragraph ends with a quotation, and the next paragraph also starts with speech by the same character, it's customary to leave the closing quotes off the first paragraph.

>sobbed Honey Crisp//

This is really over the top. You don't want your story to become maudlin. It's hard to take it seriously when that happens.

One piece of advice writing professionals will sometimes give is to avoid give your characters names that are too similar, because it's harder for the reader to keep them straight. So I'll say that this "mommy/mama" differentiation is kind of a chore to keep track of, and I'm not really trying to.

>YEAH TWILIGHT//

Why is Honey Crisp called her mom by name?

>D&A//

DNA

This isn't a bad ponification of the story it's an homage to. Really, the biggest issues are the ones I had to point out multiple times: general editing, occasional bluntness of emotional information, a fairly unsteady perspective. And the formatting. Now that I've finished reading, I can see that there isn't any plot importance to having the daughters take center stage, so they'd work fine as a framing device, but it's probably not necessary to keep that as the delivery method for the whole thing. It lessens the impact to have that extra separation between the reader and the events. The plot itself is fine, and the characterization is nice.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1976

>>1935
>I can't imagine what else could be meant by that, though looking over it again I do see your point.
My initial impression was that the "two" referred to Pinkie and Applejack, and I had to reread it a few times to figure out that wasn't the case.

>Really? I count three. Perhaps you could help me to see that which I cannot.

"Eyes narrowed, haunches set, lips pressed tightly together, sweat dripping from her forehead, ears closed to any outside disturbances"
Compound absolute phrase with five participles.
"tickling her coat, and rolling a lone tumbleweed between the two"
Compound participial phrase with two participles.
"Tightening up the springs in her legs"
Participial phrase.
"spider-webbing out in a devastating cascade effect"
Participial phrase.
"swallowing her nerves"
Participial phrase.
"Having made her calculations"
Absolute phrase containing a participle.
"Imagining her hoof going straight through"
Participial phrase.
"sending a few specks flying"
Participial phrase.
"landing hard on her backside"
Participial phrase.
"rubbing her sore rump"
Participial phrase.

>I'm terribly sorry but I am well aware of how stigmatized onomatopoeia is around here and I am also well aware that there is no hard rule against it. I know what I did, and I fully intend to leave it there.

You're having the same type of knee-jerk reaction you're accusing me of, but you don't seem to have understood what I actually wrote. I have nothing against onomatopoeia. They're not the same thing as sound effects. Many writers like to italicize onomatopoeia and put some ugly formatting like asterisks around it. In most cases, they're valid words in their own right and simply don't need that kind of treatment. Just putting them in normal font usually works fine. Furthermore, I explained why that type of formatting is ill suited for this story's tone.

In the end, yes, it's your prerogative whether to change it. It's also my prerogative to say it isn't working. You're not exactly making an argument for it, and the consensus of the many talented people who made up the former /fic/ community isn't such an easy thing to dismiss as you might think it is. But if you're sure you know better, go for it.

>Those are really hard to catch when I go back through. Do you have an editor in mind who's good at that?

There's a brief discussion on comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread. It basically comes down to recognizing what separate clauses are versus compound structures within a single clause. You generally want to use a comma when there are multiple subjects that each perform separate verbs. When subjects and verbs are shared, you don't need one unless those items are long and complex enough that a comma is necessary to keep them organized. There are exceptions. Certain kinds of dependent clauses don't normally take a comma when they follow the main clause. They're usually ones that indicate synchronization (he did this while I did that) or are part of a compound conditional statement (if he did this and I did that, then...).

I don't know of any editors that have this as a particular strength, other than ones who are good at grammar in general, like Filler or Burraku_Pansa.

>Odd how? Is there some rule against this?

No. There are no rules, just things that tend to work or not. Even simple things like spelling aren't rules, because there can be reasons to misspell a word intentionally.

Perspective gets the reader in touch with the character, but like with real people, you have to spend some time with them before you get a sense of who they are. So if you keep changing perspectives, it doesn't give the reader much chance to know your characters. At least with a limited narrator—this isn't a concern for an omniscient one. But when you have a limited narrator and have the narrator speak for the character, the reader has to know whose viewpoint the narration represents. When it changes frequently or abruptly, it can be disorienting, because the reader has to keep re-evaluating that. With a limited narrator, there's also a trust the reader places in the author that whatever character holds the perspective, there's something accomplished by that choice. Maybe there's vital information only that character knows, or maybe it's just to get the reader to identify with her. But it needs to be worth going to her, and if it's worth going to her, it ought to be worth spending more than just a sentence or two there.

>Can you point to some surrounding text? I'd rather not Ctrl+F and scroll through the whole document.

It should be easy to find. It was by itself on what should have been a blank line between paragraphs.

>the only repetitive word I can find is "blow" which I will admit is used a lot. Is there something else you were referring to that I've missed?

"blow after blow into it’s surface"
"several weak blows into the surface"

>I didn't understand that. Could you explain it another way?

If you try to start a word with an apostrophe, smart quotes assume you want an opening single quote and turn it the wrong way. You can paste in one the right way, or you can trick smart quotes by typing two single quotes in a row, which it will interpret as an opening and a closing one. Then you can delete the opening one, leaving the closing one, which is the same character as an apostrophe.

>Do you have a suggestion on how to make it smoother?

You probably don't need to go back and forth as much as you do between them. Say I have a scene where Twilight and Rarity are talking, and Rarity is sad. I can let the reader know that by going into Rarity's perspective and having the narrator make some subjective statements to indicate such from her viewpoint. Or I can have Twilight observe her behaving in a way that lets on she's feeling sad. If the scene's largely been in Twilight's perspective anyway, the latter may well be the better choice. You can get at other characters' emotional states without having the narrator take on their perspectives. But if there is justification for going from one character to another, you can do so smoothly. Rather than type it all out again, look near the end of this post, about the last 10 paragraphs: >>1946

>I think you're referring to <Her hooves made a gravelly sound in the coarse dirt, kicking up dust clouds that were swiftly whisked away in the soft breeze.> where I mentioned small clouds of dust to describe the dry ground. I made no mention of the enormous dust cloud off in the distance clearly created by something much larger than a hoof.

"kicking up dust clouds"
"cloud of dust had been kicked up into the air"
It's just a very repetitive phrasing.

>There's not a lot of different ways to describe the sound of a jackhammer, and it is supposed to be exactly the same action. Doesn't far proximity help mask repetitive phrasing?

Far proximity can mitigate repetition, though far more for word choice than phrasing. The more unusual the word, the more it stands out when repeated. The excerpt that went with this was just an example, so "jackhammer" isn't the only one, but once you've established that mental image, you don't need to refer to it in the same way again. Also look how both times you use "jackhammer," you also use "hammer" close by, one time just a sentence before, and the other time in the same sentence. It's symptomatic of a larger issue.

>She obviously has a habit of assuming its just part of Pinkie's name.

Far enough. I must have been remembering that the rest of the girls tended not to use her full name.

>Perhaps I should reword it, but there's actually nothing missing. 'pointed' is an adjective here, not a past tense verb.

"Pointed" is much more easily going to convey a shape than an action. Maybe "pointing" would be a better choice. That's what threw me.

>Could you point out more than just the one example? I can't see inconsistencies between multiple objects with just one object to observe.

Just go into edit mode and search for ! or ? immediately before or after a close italics bbcode tag. You'll find some inside the tag and some outside.

>That much wasn't obvious? I thought I'd explained it.

I got that she lacked confidence, but it's unevenly applied. She assures AJ that as an earth pony, she could break rocks. And sure enough, AJ can. Then AJ assures Pinkie that as an earth pony, she can buck apples. But Pinkie buys this, even though she couldn't break the rocks. And I don't get what Pinkie's sisters were keeping from her. That they knew it was only a confidence issue? Why wouldn't they explain that to her? They never give a reason why, and if she understood that, she'd be in a better position to getting back to breaking rocks. Plus Pinkie can still eat rocks. What's so different about that?
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1987

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>been been//

Doubled word.

There's already a decent amount of repetition in just the first screen. There are 4 "as" clauses in the first 2 paragraphs. In the 3rd paragraph, you use some version of "walk" 3 times, then twice more in the next paragraph and once more in the following one.

>dropping in at the local record store and see//

Verb forms don't match here.

>Dirt was smeared across her face and she was trying to hide herself behind several trash cans//

Needs a comma in here to separate the clauses. There's a section at the top of this thread describing how to use commas in this situation, under "comma use with conjunctions. So in tandem with that, just note that you have two subjects here, each with its own verb: Dirt was smeared... and she was trying.

>I didn’t see anyone around, nobody should bother us.//

Comma splice. Also, don't forget that your camera was following Vinyl. Last we saw her, she was peering around a corner at this, but it's been a while. What is she doing? How does she react to this?

>She would have to step in.//

The "she" this refers to hasn't been named in over a dozen paragraphs. You ought to go ahead and use her name again.

>Score, who was staring at the unicorn//

This is in a gray area. You've just barely been using a limited narrator. Mostly, the narrator's sticking to facts, but he has expressed something subjective at least once. Here's an example: "However, she’d done some pretty good zoning out in the last period and wanted to head straight home." Here, "pretty good" is a judgment call that the narrator is making on Vinyl's behalf, so it tends to make the narrator limited in Vinyl's perspective. Actually, this is going to branch into a bit bigger discussion.

You ought to decide whether you want to use a limited or omniscient narration. An omniscient narrator ought to stick to facts (well, even that's negotiable, but it's a pretty advanced topic), but he can dip into various characters' thoughts. A limited narrator can only say what the current perspective character knows or perceives, and it's best not to switch perspective characters too often or abruptly. Limited narrators can still sound pretty factual, but just confine themselves to a single character. Or they can essentially become the character, stating their thoughts and opinions for them in the narration, and even taking on their voice. So far, you're closest to that factual limited narrator, since you stick with what Vinyl sees. You do have the occasional spot, like that "pretty good," where you have the narrator assume Vinyl's character. So it'd help if you made things consistent. Either keep the narration factual and get rid of things like that (explicitly attribute the opinion to her, for example), or let the narrator essentially become her and sprinkle around more of these subjective thoughts of hers as narration.

So back to my original point. If you want the narration taking on the kind of limited voice where he can state Vinyl's thoughs and opinions for her, then you want to avoid using descriptors like "the unicorn" for her, since that implies she's describing herself that way. And that's just odd.

>P-Please//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something, like a name, that has to be capitalized anyway.

>Dumb-Bell said with a snort//

Missing your end punctuation.

>Vinyl grit her teeth.//

The past tense is "gritted."

>accompanied by a wet squelch//

Most times, you'll want to set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>laying in a puddle/

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to get right.

>bitch!//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on a word italicized for emphasis (as opposed to being a foreign word or part of a title, for instance), include it in the italics.

>beginning the rub Vinyl’s wounds//

Typo.

>T-thanks//

Think about what sound she'd actually repeat.

>She paused.//

You sure use pausing actions a lot. They're pretty dull. What happens during the pause?

>me — I//

Don't leave spaces around an em dash.

>I can deal with mom worrying about me.//

When you use it in place of a name (versus something more generic like "my mom"), "Mom" gets capitalized.

>“I can do that,” she smiled.//

Speech attributions need speaking actions. You've already skated the edge by using "sighed" as one. But how do you smile a sentence?

>Las Pegasus//

There's been lots of fandom debate about this. iirc, the writers indicated it was a play on Los Angeles, not Las Vegas, so "Los" might be the more correct spelling. But I don't know for sure.

>Derpy heard the faint sound of a piano playing throughout the area.//

Your narration so far had exclusively followed Vinyl, but this is something Vinyl couldn't know, unless you explain how she figured it out, that Derpy's ears perked toward it or something. It's quite possible to switch perspectives, but there's no vital information we're getting by doing so here, so I don't see the point. Plus if you wanted to jump heads occasionally, particularly with an omniscient viewpoint, you should probably establish that early on so it doesn't come as a surprise here when you do.

>That’s mom playing.//

Capitalize "Mom" again. Here, I'll also say that I only mark the first couple instances of something before leaving it to the author to find the rest, so for all the things I've pointed out, scan the entire story for them.

>wine red//

You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>An older mare with a white coat matching Vinyl’s and a long, wine red mane and tail//

You're definitely not in Vinyl's perspective anymore, as these are things she would already know.

>Vinyl said the first thing that came to mind,//

Well, maybe you are in Vinyl's perspective. Nobody else would know this. By this point, I'd say you're closest to using an omniscient narrator, as you rarely have the narrator say anything subjective. So in making the narration consistent, that's probably the easiest way to go, but I'll keep an eye on it.

>The poor thing couldn’t be older than thirteen. She was so polite, too.//

That didn't take long. This is not the shallow kind of limited narration you'd shown a few signs of, where the narrator would use a subjective term like "pretty good" that would reflect a character's judgment. This is having the narrator directly state a character's thoughts. The narrator essentially is Claret here. So this really muddies the waters as to what kind of narrator you have. If you want the kind this excerpt represents, then you really have to tone down how often you switch perspectives, and you have to change them smoothly. For example, let's go back just a few paragraphs:
>An older mare with a white coat matching Vinyl’s and a long, wine red mane and tail sat at the piano, seeming oddly still as she kept her eyes closed while using her magic to strike the keys.//
This is Derpy's perspective.
>She then saw Vinyl’s bloodied and bruised face and immediately stopped playing.//
Next paragraph, Claret's perspective.
>Vinyl said the first thing that came to mind,//
Next paragraph, Vinyl's perspective.
>Derpy shook her head silently, yet violently, sighing as hard as she could for Vinyl to think of something else.//
Next paragraph, Derpy's perspective.
>Claret then noticed Derpy hiding behind Vinyl.//
Next paragraph, Claret's perspective.
>Derpy said, a bit shy in front of Vinyl’s mother.//
Next paragraph, Derpy's perspective.
You can get away with jumping around like this in omniscient narration, insofar as you're making factual statements about them. But if you're using a limited narration, it's more jarring. Not that you can't get at all this information from a single perspective. Take that last one. If you instead describe how Derpy acts (like you had her hiding behind Vinyl earlier), then it's something another character can observe and conclude shyness from. You don't have to state it from Derpy's head.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1988

>>1987
>“And she’s good enough to get a house like this just by doing that? That’s amazing.”//
This is the 7th paragraph in a row with no narration. There's a description of this in the section on "talking heads" at the top of this thread, which will explain why that can be a bad thing. We're also not getting much of a description of how the room looks, though if you're going to use a limited narrator, be careful how you color it. For example, everything will be new and unusual if Derpy describes it, but it's all familiar to Vinyl.

>age” Claret added.//

Missing punctuation.

>She paused for a second, “most//

That's not a speaking verb.

>I knew this town was perfect for Vinyl and I//

Lots of people make this kind of error because they're deathly afraid of using "me" incorrectly, but it's actually the right choice here. "Vinyl and I" is equivalent to "we," and "Vinyl and me" is equivalent to "us." Which sounds correct, "for we" or "for us"?

>All right mom,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address gets commas on both sides. And another "Mom" that needs to be capitalized

>Evening had come upon Ponyville, the lively bright town was now in darkness with the roads being lit by the town lamps.//

Comma splice.

>Yeah, as said earlier//

Missing word, and another spot that needs a comma between clauses.

You have an awful lot of sighing in this story, too. Actually, now that I look back through, you have 7 sighs and 7 pauses. That's not a ton, but you tend to use them in clusters, which can inflate the sense that they happen a lot.

>However, rather than taking the shortcut through the alley, she would meet up with Derpy just outside of the campus.//

This sounds odd. The first part is worded like a one-time thing, but the second part sounds recurring.

>What about you Vinyl?//

You're missing a number of direct address commas early in chapter 2.

>Yeah, my mother hopes I will follow in her steps and become a pianist, she taught me to play since I was a filly.//

And these comma splices are an occasional problem.

>Closing her eyes, her horn glowed//

This says that her horn closed her eyes.

>she missed a note giving a small groan//

Just another example of a participial phrase that needs a comma.

>missing a few more notes, the piece became sloppy//

And this says the piece missed notes. You're falling into a few of the traps of participles.

>“Damn it.” She said//

Punctuation/capitalization

>Vinyl walked over to the fridge opened it//

Missing word.

>We are well stocked.//

That's just an odd comment. Can you imagine your mother saying that to you if you offered to go to the store?

>Walking through the neighborhood, it was still the mid-afternoon//

This says the mid-afternoon is walking through the neighborhood. You really need to watch for these dangling participles. Make sure what they modify actually appears in the clause.

>“Right,” Vinyl raced to the kitchen phone and punched in the emergency line.//

Another example of a non-speaking action masquerading as a dialogue tag.

>“Ready to roll.” Tender said closing the back doors to the chariot as they immediately took off.//

Wouldn't all this upset Vinyl? But she acts like none of it bothers her. She's just there, she's calm, and... nothing.

>Crush came around and assisted with moving Claret to the large doors that lead to the ER//

The past tense is "led." This isn't the only time you use it.

>S-she’s//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated.

>Seven-hundred//

That part doesn't get hyphenated.

>footsteps were heard inside until the door was opened//

Why all the passive voice?

>20’s//

twenties

>The image of her mother laying on the ground//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Vinyl breaking down in front of Derpy//

But she broke down before Derpy got there. You're also taking a more personal voice, seemingly putting the narrative in Vinyl's perspective, but earlier, you gave a full description of Rarity, whom Vinyl already knows, so there's a bit of a disconnect there.

The further I get into the story, the more I'm only going to mark plot or character problems I see, since I'll be here two weeks pulling out every little mechanical thing. I'll still mark new issues, but suffice it to say the story needs a sweep for anything I've commented on multiple times.

>That was certainly,” Rarity paused to search for the perfect word, “surprising.”//

Here's how to put a narrative aside in a quote:
That was certainly—” Rarity paused to search for the perfect word “—surprising.”
And you could even eliminate the pause, since it's implied by the placement of the dashes (they'd go outside the quotes if there wasn't a pause).

These few scenes at the beginning of chapter 5 do hint at some plot developments, but they lack depth. They just happen. How does Vinyl feel about these things? What does she think? Invest some emotion in them.

>Stepping inside//

This is the third straight sentence to start with a participle. And you have others in these sentences as well. Over these two paragraphs, you have seven participles.

>Walking in first, Derpy’s eyes widened//

This says that Derpy's eyes walked in first.

>Thank you for telling me by the way; the truth.//

There's a certain formalism about semicolons that doesn't play well with fragments. You really do essentially need complete sentences on both sides of one.

>she tried to find the words but couldn’t think of anything and only said the first thing that came to mind.//

You started the scene in Vinyl's perspective. It couldn't be Derpy's because she wasn't even there. So why jump to Derpy's head already? This is the kind of information you don't even need to be in Derpy's perspective to relate. Vinyl can intuit it from how Derpy acts.

>Derpy said with a frown//

And they're on the phone. Vinyl wouldn't be able to see her frown.

>Walking over to the kitchen, she prepared the coffee pot and turned it on.//

This is another common trap of participial phrases. They mean that things happen at the same time, so make sure it's resonable for them to. Here, she wouldn't prepare the coffee pot until after she'd walked to the kitchen.

>noticing that Vinyl was staring at her//

This is your third use of "notice" in the last four paragraphs.

>Wanting to get it off her mind//

It's better to demonstrate motivations than to spell them out. How you do that will ultimately depend on what type of narrator you choose.

>“Could I adopt you?”//

Ah, I saw this coming. Really, this is awfully quick, though. That's a huge decision, and as far as I know, she just makes it on the spur of the moment. She must have considered it before, or maybe discussed the possibility with Vinyl. This is akin to a romance, where the couple doesn't gradually develop feelings for each other, but just suddenly decides they're in love. It doesn't make for a convincing story, because things just don't happen that way in the real world, plus warming up to the idea is what gets the reader invested. I'd encourage you to work in the seeds of this idea somewhat earlier in the story so that this feels like the culmination of a process instead of a snap decision.

>W-who//

Another spot where the stutter isn't exactly the right sound.

>Since her diagnosis, Claret had not been able to use her magic and with that, lost the ability to play the piano.//

Why not? Ponies play keyboard instruments with their hooves in canon. And she's gotten into doing other things without her magic out of necessity, like writing. Why wouldn't she have tried learning to play piano without magic?

>“Vinyl?” Claret said.

>
>Vinyl didn’t hear her, still lost in her own thoughts.//
Another perspective spot I wanted to point out. If you want to use Vinyl's perspective for a limited narrator, then the narrator can't present dialogue she didn't hear.

>18th//

Write out numbers that short.

>Along the way she passed by some ponies who gave her a nod or a ‘hello’//

You'd presented her early in the story as a bit of an outcast, but everything seems to have changed. When and how did that happen?

>Walking inside//

This is your third use of "walking" in the last four paragraphs. Furthermore, all three of them are participles that start a sentence.

>she saw an earth mare in the store by herself stocking the shelves//

Is this the same store she visited early in the story? If so, I'll say again that I'd expect Vinyl to know this mare instead of leaving her unnamed.

The circumstances of Claret's death are a little on the convenient side. There's still power in a death that's had enough invested in the characters that the reader will care about them. But having her die right after she admitted she'd stopped her treatments and played her piano for the first time in months... that's the kind of thing you expect to see in a sappy movie or Harlequin novel. That is to say, there is a market for such things, but they also come across as somewhat insincere and formulaic, because it never happens like that in real life. So I guess it depends on whether you want something sensationalistic or more authentic and personally relatable. The latter would be better literature, but the former will probably get more readers, and I can't fault you for choosing either one over the other.

>“Upstairs,” Vinyl said, walking up the stairs first, leading the two behind her.//

This is very bland. Wouldn't these two observe her acting like she was upset? But nothing like that gets a single mention.

>Walking up to the upper hall, the door to Claret’s room was open.//

Dangling participle. Whoever "walking up to the upper hall" is supposed to describe, they don't appear in the clause. This says that the door walked up there.

>Vinyl looked at her mother, who remained underneath the white sheet. Derpy did the same.//

This kind of makes it sound like Derpy also remained under the sheet.

>They all thought about the good times they’d had with her throughout the past//

You started the scene in Derpy's perspective, so why are you going to some sort of collective viewpoint here? And list a few brief examples of these good times. That will carry far more impact that a generalization.

>heading to the cemetery, which was housed atop a hill//

A single hilltop? That's an awfully small cemetery.

>A small waitress approached the two.//

Odd line break here.

>Derpy picked up her mug, taking a sip//

This is the third paragraph in a row where someone "takes a sip." I don't know what it is in this fandom, but when characters share a beverage, authors suddenly lose all creativity and can think of nothing for them to do but "take another sip." Please don't be one of them.

>Vinyl’s ears fell, feeling a bit of regret for not giving Derpy her voice.//

Another dangling participle. Her ears felt regret?

I have to say, that letter Claret left with her lawyer was underwhelming. It was very vague, and I can't imagine why any of the things in it couldn't be said while she was still alive. It's not exactly surprising that she'd want Vinyl to find love and happiness.

>T-thousand//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. That word doesn't even have a "t" sound in it.

>Rarity took a sip of her tea.//

Don't start this again.

>It was sort of impromptu.//

Making a pun? Vinyl's not reacting as if she thinks it's funny.

Okay, there's a nice story in here. It's just a little buried under some writing issues that take away from it. It needs the attention of a good editor. I've at least pointed out the different kind of problems I saw, and I hope that's enough that you can spot the rest yourself. Plus there's a fair amount of word and phrase repetition.

Perspective wandered around a lot, too, shifting back and forth on a whim and without always paying attention to which character could be attributed with the narrator's thoughts. And when in a character's perspective, it tended to skimp on emotional cues at times when they should actually be running quite high. And the narration gets neglected in places in favor of letting the dialogue singlehandedly carry the emotion.

Lastly, and this is just a suggestion, but the timing of Claret's death is quite melodramatic, which tends to lessen its impact.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 1990

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>some of the books weren’t in the best of conditions//

"Condition" would be singular there. I'll also note that I'm seeing quite a few "to be" verbs early on. It's impractical to remove them from a story completely, but you should look for opportunities to rephrase them with more active verbs. "To be" verbs are inherently boring, as nothing happens, and you especially don't want to create a feeling of stagnation right away, where you're trying to hook the reader.

>would never have forbid//

forbidden

You have a lot of exposition right up front, and there are few more boring ways to start a story. A couple paragraphs, sure, but this goes on for a while, over 10% of the story. These are the kinds of details that are best to weave in with action. Either bring them up little by little as they become relevant or have Twilight there doing something with the books as you describe them. That way, the reader already has a visual of what's happening instead of having to wade through a lot of factual description until getting to something he can picture. The reader is here for the action and the characters. Get to one or the other as quickly as possible.

>the foal’s section//

It's presumably there for more than one foal, so make that a plural possessive.

>last minute//

You're using that whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>or pouring over a book//

poring

>down her saddlebags and trotted down//

Try to avoid close word repetition like that.

Okay, a word about your choice of speaking verbs. Your basic "said" is meant to go almost unnoticed, and it's generally going to be your most-used one. Of course, you don;t have to tag all your dialogue when it's obvious who's speaking. The more unusual speaking verbs are fine once in a while for variety or when it's important for the reader to understand how something was spoken. But the more unusual ones you use, it stands out as a writing tic, and it starts to draw attention away from the speech. That's not a good thing. Here are all your speaking verbs so far:
pleaded, promised, pointed out, countered, muttered, called, called (watch that repetition!), said, said, asked, said, said, chuckled, asked, teased, echoed, agreed, said, said, pointed out, said.

You do have a fair amount of "said"s in there, and "asked" is also pretty mundane, but look how many oddball ones you have there. I definitely noticed.

>Spike was both relieved and a little disappointed as well.//

You just said this earlier in the same paragraph:
>a little disappointed//
Besides being repetitive, you're also speaking from two different viewpoints in the same paragraph. You've been teetering on the edge of perspective several times. Mostly, your narrator sticks to facts. It is a fact that Spike is disappointed. This could be in an omniscient voice. When a narrator says something that's a judgment or opinion, or when he speaks a character's thoughts for him, then he becomes a limited narrator. And you've done a little of that. Here are a couple of examples:
>They appeared to be connected on the ends//
Appeared to whom? Surely, this is Spike's judgment.
>Come to think of it, did Starswirl wear glasses?//
This isn't just a subjective judgment, but Spike's actual stream of thought, presented as narration. This effectively makes Spike the narrator. When you go limited like this, it's a bad thing to switch perspectives too often or too abruptly. There's a section on "head hopping" at the top of this thread that explains.

>Some of them you know quite well//

Missing a line break here.

>Aren’t you supposed to be good now, after all?//

By now, she's asked three questions, at least. He did excuse her on the first ones, since she didn't know the rules yet, and on another, since he considered it to be part of her first official one. But he already warned her to choose her words carefully, so why is he not enforcing it now? It sure seems like Discord to nitpick and charge her a question for something like this, so why is he letting her off the hook after telling her he wouldn't anymore?

>Before it came along//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause, but it also looks like you have a line break issue here, too.

>In answer, you both do feel it are too small to really feel it.//

Missing word.

>And that, Twilight, is why I left you this message.//

Missed line break.

>But it just couldn’t be true... How could the universe be killing itself simply through the act of existing in the first place?/

By now, you definitely have a limited narrator in Twilight's perspective, so I'd recommend trimming out the earlier bits that delved into Spike's. There wasn't anything important that came of it, so it's better to stick to one viewpoint rather than change it unnecessarily.

>after that... Thing//

That parses fine as a continuation of the same sentence, so why capitalize it?

>looking up worriedly to her mentor.//

A couple problems with this. First (and you've done this a few times already), it's better to demonstrate emotion that state it. If she's worried, how would that make her look and act? Think about how an actor would get you to think his character was worried. He wouldn't simply tell the audience he was. The other issue: consider the viewpoint. The way you've described this, it requires someone to see her facial expression and deduce from that that she's worried. But Twilight can't see her own face, and she knows she's worried without looking at it anyway. So how does she perceive her own worry? She'd know things she does voluntarily or could feel, like if she was gaping or her eye was twitching. Since you've had the narrator take a conversational tone in expressing Twilight's thoughts for her, you can go that route as well by having the narrator make a comment that expresses her mood.

>Twilight demanded, sounding hurt//

Again, you're forcing an external evaluation of her tone of voice where the narrator should be internal to her.

>I’m... Still not sure what to think//

Another spot where there's no reason to capitalize after the ellipsis.

Not a bad story, but it's also not exactly an original concept. Being troubled by the eventual end of the universe is something that has been dealt with in countless stories, so the point is to have a unique take on it. Having Discord be the agent of that end is also not particularly original, though I've only seen a few instances of him communicating through a book like this. Since the concept is nothing new, and the angle is only somewhat different, you need to stand out on writing quality.

On that aspect, the biggest things that stood out to me were:

—The opening section of exposition isn't the most interesting way to start off a story, unless it just happens to hit a reader's world-building sweet spot.
—The section where Twilight's talking to the book eschews the narration almost completely. It's akin to a dialogue-only story, so have a look at the section on "talking heads" at the top of this thread, too. It really creates a disconnect that this is a real event happening in a real place. Without any grounding that there's a whole world out there, that Twilight does things while talking to it, that there's an actual room around them, that Spike's still there (the story pretty much forgets about him entirely), they might as well be floating in a featureless void. And unless that's really what you intend, it's less engaging.
—Be careful with your perspective. Keep in mind who holds it, don't change it unnecessarily, when you have to change it, do so smoothly, and hold your descriptions to how the viewpoint character would know or perceive things.
—Except for the dialogue, there isn't much to indicate that Twilight is affected by all this. Put her feelings on display through her actions and appearance, plus narrative comment. You clearly mean for her to be upset, but she just doesn't come across as such.

If you can tune those kinds of things up, you'd have a much more powerful story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2010

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>snow white//

You're using the whole phrase as an adjective, so hyphenate it.

>cardgame//

That's two words.

>In my peripheral//

Peripheral what? It's only a noun in the sense of computer equipment.

>It’s altitude//

You constantly use "it's" where you need "its." Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes, like hers, his, ours.

>the pilot of the airship, who I could not seem to see//

whom

I'll step in for a moment here to say that I might not care as much about minutiae of grammar so much, but when you write in such a formal, florid style, it comes part and parcel with that to get it right.

>Despite it’s outwardly harshness//

You've used an adverb where you need an adjective.

>A….as//

One too many dots there.

>my blooming dread and fear//

It has far more impact to demonstrate emotion than to state it outright.

>The guard was a familiar voice though, I had heard her shouting at other ponies in the scrapyard//

Comma splice. This is an intermittent problem, and one that might be excused in some instances, but with this formal-sounding a narrator, it just doesn't fit.

For that matter, you've now identified this character as an adolescent. She speaks far more formally than I'd expect of someone that age. And I don't just mean her dialogue. The narration is essentially her speaking as well, and that's where it doesn't sound very adolescent. It's possible that's just part of her character, but then it'd be interesting to know why. If you're going to have her use language out of the norm, then start working in a little detail here and there to show why she's that way. Basically if someone's not the default the reader will expect, it warrants some explanation, but not generally as a single block of exposition, but as information worked into the story little by little.

>I quickly whipped around, and began scuttling across the wreckage in the direction of where we had left the airship propellers we had found amongst the discarded ships.//

Watch for places like this. When the same subject performs both verbs, you don't need a comma. You use one when there are multiple subjects that each get their own verbs.

>back and started back//

Even though they're meant in different senses, try to avoid repeating words in a close space like this.

>her mane and coat was//

Number agreement.

>m’am//

ma’am

>my panicking thoughts//

Why don't we get to see any od these panicking thoughts? That's what first-person is uniquely suited for.

>“Nice to meet you, Celestia,” she offered a hoof//

>You want a bit of freedom?” she gave the gondola of her airship a playful hit with a hoof.//
You punctuated that like a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb. This is also a pervasive problem.

>Of course, as of a week prior, I was the exception; the pony who returned home with a little more knowledge and a little less blindness to the world outside of Cyclosa.//

A semicolon essentially separates complete sentences. You ought to be able to replace it with a period, but what follows it here couldn't stand alone.

>five foot long//

Another spot where you use a whole phrase as a single adjective, so it needs to be hyphenated.

>"Celly?" A high pitched voice called out in barely repressed terror.//

Assuming that's supposed to be a dialogue tag, why did you capitalize it? It doesn't matter that the speech didn't end in a comma.

>Where’s mom and dad?//

Family relations get capitalized when used as names, i.e., "Mom" versus "my mom."

>capitol.” I explained.//

Punctuation.

>T...that’s//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat.

>we did nothing but lay alone//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to keep straight.

Take a look at how different her dialogue sounds than her narration. There's no reason for such a dichotomy. She's not trying to dumb down her speech or anything. Consider what I said earlier about justifying this big a break between her age and apparent maturity. If it's because she's educated or well-read, for instance, this is about the place I would have expected to see some evidence of it. She doesn't live in circumstances that would facilitate schooling, but I thought you might have a cache of books in her house or something. But no. Right around here is also the first inkling I get that the narrator might actually be an adult Celestia reflecting on her past:
>Even then, she was evidently terrified and disturbed by the apparent celebration of what in later years we would later come to decide of as a blatant murder.//
That's the kind of framing device you want to establish early, not this far into the story.

>I wasn’t going to deny Luna anymore hope//

"Anymore" isn't the same thing as "any more." An adverb doesn't parse here; you actually need it to be two words.

>jumping up and down with excitement//

This is a common thing writers do, and unnecessarily. When you attach an "in/with/of emotion" phrase, it feeds a conclusion to the reader that he should be able to draw himself, just like if you use an emotion as an adverb, like "happily." But what's worse about this is that is almost always repeats something we could already tell. Jumping up and down connotes excitement, so why would you give me redundant information?

>as her breathing grew in intensity as she fell asleep//

It's pretty clunky to tack together two "as" clauses like that.

So I'm definitely getting that an older Celestia is narrating this. That changes the rules about why the narration sounds much more adult than Celestia's dialogue, but put some of this phrasing that makes it obvious right at the beginning of the story. Otherwise, there's a disconnect, and it doesn't get explained until well into the story, which can be confusing.

>millenniums//

millennia

Okay, then we get one entire scene and a long bit at the beginning of a second that are entirely exposition. That's a quick way to bore readers. It's better to pick your moments and introduce these kinds of details piecemeal, as they become relevant to what's happening, instead of dealing with them in large chunks.

>even if everyday I worked//

Same deal as "anymore." This doesn't mean the same thing as "every day." The word you've chosen is an adjective that means usual or routine. "Every day" is an adverb phrase that means exactly what it says.

>The initial charm from that first pilot I had meant//

I think you intended to use "met" here.

>ever speak to any of them ever//

Watch that repetition.

>there was no further theatrics//

Number mismatch.

>With a protesting grumbled//

Jumbled wording.

>She hadn’t enough time to fall asleep and she instead rolled over with a protesting grumble.//

And then you repeat it very soon after.

>one thousand, seven hundred and twenty seven//

You've used this phrase twice. I guess it's up to you whether she'd actually word it like that, but in a technical sense, it's wrong to have the "and" in there. You don't need the comma, either.

Now that I'm moving on to chapter 2, I'm not going to be as detailed. For one thing, I'll never finish if I go through the whole story this carefully, and for another, it'd likely just be more and more instances of the same things. I'll point out new problems and plot/character issues only.

>It tried to attack the capital//

You spelled it "capitol" in the last chapter. This is probably the one you want, though either one is potentially correct, depending on exactly what you mean.

>personal perspective provided//

Alliteration like this often creates a playful feel, which runs counter to the tone you have.

>to be anymore than afraid//

An adverb doesn't parse there. You need "any more" to be two words.

>You might be an alicorn too, Luna.//

Why? She hasn't presented any evidence of such. She doesn;t even know why she's one, so she can't apply the same circumstances to Luna. If it's genetic, for instance, wouldn't she be worried about her parents as well?

>second-thought//

There's no reason to use a hyphen here.

>after awhile//

Another spot where an adverb doesn't parse, so "a while" should be two words.

>double-back//

No reason for a hyphen there, either.

>return back to//

Redundant

>seemingly-oblivious//

You never need to hyphenate two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb.

>I knew they did not to dwell in too frequently//

Seems like you're missing a word.

>“Celestia!” she suddenly stopped and turned around to face me, her voice a hissing whisper, “Why don’t we split up?//

Besides not having a speaking verb in your attribution, your pattern of capitalization and punctuation suggests both parts of the quote merge into a single spoken sentence, yet you;ve already given the first part end punctuation.

>pathetic looking locks//

And here's the kind of phrase that does need a hyphen. You need the entire phrase of "pathetic-looking" to function as a single adjective. Without the hyphen, it says there are pathetic locks that are looking.

>while I was placing in my saddlebag//

Missing a word.

>strong view of me being a strong//

Try to avoid close repetition like this.

>predated Luna and I//

People are so desperate to avoid misusing "me" that they often make this mistake. "Luna and I" is the same thing as "we." "Luna and me" is the same thing as "us." Which sounds correct, "predated we" or "predated us"?

>He thankfully did not seem to be looking in our direction, instead his focus seemed to be diverted elsewhere.//

Comma splice, and watch the repetition of "seem." But more than that, "seem" is a verb you should endeavor to avoid where possible. It involves a judgment not apparent to the reader. What about him makes it look like he doesn't see them? Describe that, and you won't have to use the word.

>I suppose a description is in order for Discord’s loyal guard.//

No. No, it really isn't. If you have vital information about them, present it as it becomes relevant, just like the exposition I talked about earlier. Consider also that you're building up tension with them creeping around in the market, at risk of being discovered. Now's not the time to go off on a tangent about things that don't even matter. Plus it stops the action dead in its tracks, and not in a way that keeps the tension up. See if you can imply a lot of this through a brief description of the one guard there instead of having the narrator go into full digression mode.

>to escape the squabble they’d have to endure otherwise//

Are you sure you didn't mean "squalor"? This seems like a poor word choice.

>This was the choice they would have made.//

>if this had indeed been a conscious choice they had made//
Quite repetitive phrasing in consecutive sentences without there being any obvious intentional effect from doing so. If you're repeating things on purpose, you'll normally want to call attention to it in some way.

>pointless clearing//

I don't get why you say the clearing is pointless.

>other guards or perhaps even awakened ponies had joined the cause of hunting me down//

If that's the case, how hard would it be for her to pretend to be one of these?

>Her crying was silent, but were not lacking in strength.//

Mismatched verbs.

>stoicness//

stoicism

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2011

>>2010

>guard-tower//

That's not a hyphenated term.

>I’d might as well//

I've never seen that phrased with a "had" or "would," whichever the contraction is using.

>I had no actually seen//

Something went awry there.

>one issue that neither could skirt around were the dust-storms.//

Subject-verb number agreement: issue... were.

>card-games//

You sure make some odd choices of what to hyphenate. Are you trying to make this sound like it was written in the early 1900s or something? If so, it's even curious from that angle as to what other multi-word nouns or compound words you choose not to hyphenate.

>pegasi guards//

Noun adjuncts are singular. For example, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

>was now rend//

Typo.

Around here, I'm noticing an awful lot of word repetition. There are a handful that keep appearing, like storm, smog, sprint, huddle, grey.

>“Oh right,” I thought to myself.//

You don't need both quotes and italics to identify a thought. Italics would be plenty in isolation, and either one will do, since you've tagged it as a thought.

>it was him//

he

>help us remain discrete//

I don't think there's any danger of this changing. In other words, you want "discreet."

>for that I have no empathy for//

Missing word.

>to whatever city they led to//

Redundant "to."

Hasn't Celestia done anything to fix her cloak? It's still possible she'd encounter someone.

>the true blunt of it//

Did you mean "brunt"?

>sick and barbaric point of origin//

You'd referred to them eating rats previously. How's this so different? At least you address it, but what makes small animals any less worthy of respect?

>Joy and enthusiasm gradually pulled Luna’s voice higher and higher in pitch to a near-squeal of delight//

Just reiterating that you'll want to watch for places here where you bluntly inform the reader of character emotions instead of evoking a mental image he can use to deduce the same.

>The closest thing to us that was not barren dirt were the odd rock formations.//

Subject-verb number agreement: thing... were.

>dust storm//

You were hyphenating that in the last chapter.

>I could hear the wind from within//

There's a concept called narrative filtering which I'll try to cover very quickly. In a close narration like first person or a very subjective third person, the character basically is the narrator. Neither type of narrator can know or perceive things that the character can't and vice versa. So you don;t need to say she could hear this. It's already implicit in the fact tha the narrator says it. It's only worth pointing out if you want to emphasize it's something difficult to hear or the most others would miss. But you've already made a big deal about how loud the winds are, so it doesn't even fit that exception.

>Had they taken even a moment’s rest, and the strong backwinds of the dust storm would have grabbed hold of their wings//

There's no reason to have that "and" there.

>and had been picked up the backdrifts of the dust storm//

Missing word. These are the kinds of things careful editing will pick up, no matter how well versed in grammar you are.

>Woah//

Why can so few authors spell this right?

>I earnestly could think of no logical progression of thought//

You sure you didn't mean "honestly"? And this is just weirdly phrased. Why would you think of a progression of thought instead of just thinking it? It's like saying you read the sentences of a book. Just say you read the book.

>while Luna watched on with speechless apprehension, while beating her recovered cloak free of an immense weight of sand//

Pretty clunky to have two "while" clauses tacked together like that.

>I knew that if it escalated anymore than we would be wandering into town shivering and dripping wet//

Than/then confusion.

>the trodden path from atop the hill lead to//

Typo. You usually get "led" right, so this must just be an oversight.

>this was no more evident then in the walls surrounding the city//

Than/then confusion again.

>some poor ponies house//

You have a plural where you need a possessive. The editing's actually getting worse further into the story.

>Finally, our trek heralded an entrance into the town.//

Really odd word choice. That's something else that's getting a bit worse the further I read: you're choosing obtusely complex words that don't really fit the situation at times. How did their trek herald anything, especially an entrance? It was already there.

>she admit sullenly//

Typo.

>to not//

Those words should occur in the reverse order.

>seemed to have fallen into disrepair. It seemed//

You're using that word an awful lot lately. It's a very weak verb.

>It was a mad congregation of ponies with every possible purpose.//

That's the second use of "purpose" in the paragraph and the fifth in the last six paragraphs.

>seemed to be in use as makeshift cookstoves. Luna seemed//

More of this? You use some variation of this word 23 times in the chapter. That's quite a bit, and they tend to come in clusters.

>it was unquestionably supposed to be myself//

Reflexive pronouns should really only be used when they refer to the same thing or person as the clause's subject.

>seemed to small//

Typo.

>“ The Damask Rose.//

Extraneous space.

>whether or not we were in the ship or not//

Redundant "or not."

>filly.” Mrs. Rose said//

Punctuation.

>But I doubt her owner’s felt the same//

You're using a possessive where you need a plural.

>the only other sound was our hooves sloshed/

Verb form.

>‘Inn’ stenciled in proud red capitals//

If it's in capitals, then why didn't you spell it as such?

>Lanterns and firelight bloomed from the windows and was//

Subject-verb number agreement: lanterns and firelight... was

>A dozen gruff looking stallion’s eyes sitting with their muzzles half engulfed by large mugs of liquor followed us//

This really sounds like you're saying their eyes had muzzles and were sitting.

>She rose an eyebrow//

Rise/rose is intransitive. You want raise/raised. And why is this indented?

>which I think would be a comfortable home to indeed a blind bat alone//

Huh? That's some really convoluted wording.

>as far from//

Seems like you never really complete this phrase.

>We’re almost out of this, sis.//

As terms of address, family relations get capitalized.

>The Earth ponies//

I don't recall you capitalizing this in earlier chapters. Unless you're going to capitalize all the races, it shouldn't be.

>“No!” I said loudly, slamming a hoof down on the table.//

Aren't they trying to avoid attracting attention?

>eying//

eyeing

>As I had expected, it had no source.//

If she expected that, then why did it surprise her just two paragraphs ago?

>me and Luna were just flying north/

Luna and I

>We instantly both broke into a canter simultaneously, turning wildly and randomly through alley after alley until we were nearly lost into the heart of the city’s slums.//

Adverbs are often something that should be used sparingly, because they tend to sum up things instead of presenting a visual picture of them. These aren't the worst kind, but you have an awful lot of them in the sentence: instantly, simultaneously, wildly, randomly, nearly.

>lead ahead//

Where else would one lead?

>rung//

A couple times lately you've used "rung" where you should be using "rang."

>once in awhile//

"A while" needs to be two words here.

>after thought//

afterthought

>I was almost disappointed//

Not sure why that's slightly indented.

>the gangplank of was dropped//

The gangplank of what?

>me and Luna wordlessly lunged for them//

Luna and I

>the Rose’s//

Another possessive that should be a plural.

>Me and Luna was//

Really?

>"So, where did you two have in mind to "high tail it" to?"//

For quotes nested in other quotes, alternate using single and double quotation marks.

>and was laying half on the floor//

Lay/lie confusion.

I'm stopping at the end of chapter 4. I've only pointed out a sampling of the editing problems I'm finding, at least one of every type, but not every instance of each type. The editing problems are already pervasive enough that I'd have to turn it back to you for revision, so there's not much point in making you wait another week while I make my way through the rest of it, only to catalog more and more examples of the same things. Plus the editing is actually getting worse the further I read.

So step 1: you need to make a concentrated editing pass, and that may require enlisting someone else's help. There are lots of grammatical problems and repetition. The characters and plot are fine through what I've read. It's an interesting story with lots of good world-building. But it tends to get bogged down in exposition at times, particularly front-loading the story with it, and there are hints here and there that an older Celestia is the narrator, yet you never provide a framing structure to suggest such, so it's inconsistent. If that's how you want to play it, I'd suggest: establish that as soon as possible in chapter 1; make comments from a future Celestia's perspective more regularly throughout in order to remind the reader of that periodically; if you're going to phrase her narration as if she's talking to someone, then you need to define who that is and their motivations relative to each other.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2024

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>which sang it's screeching, stabbing melody//

Its/it's confusion. If you intend it to show possession, don't use an apostrophe. Possessive pronouns never have them, like his, our, and your.

>She pressed the snooze button with a hoof and let it hang limply from the bed.//

Kind of sounds like she's letting the snooze button hang. It'd probably help if you showed the transition, since her hoof wouldn't be in a position to hang when hitting the button.

>Twilight knew that it would be good for him.//

You're taking a fairly personal voice in Twilight's perspective, which already makes it implicit that Twilight knows or perceives anything the narrator says. You don't need to say she knew this. Just say it's so, and the opinion automatically gets attributed to her.

>She felt the chill of the blankets//

I don't get why the blankets would be chilly. Isn't it the point of a blanket not to be, especially since she's been in bed all night?

>she couldn't lay in bed all day, or stay curled under the covers, staring at the ceiling and allowing herself to think.//

Lay/lie confusion. You don't need that first comma, since the same subject performs both verbs, and you just had her staring at the ceiling a paragraph ago. There's no apparent effect to the repetition.

>she thought to herself/

Authors like to use that phrasing, but really, who else would she think it to?

>So simple.//

You're inconsistent on the verb tenses in the paragraph.

>She stared into the mirror//

You've used "stare" quite a few times in the story already.

>Turning the water faucet to hot, the water streamed down and began filling the bathroom with the gentle patter of water.//

Presumably, she's the one turning the faucet to hot, but she doesn't appear in the sentence. This says the water turned the faucet. It's also probably unnecessary to mention water three times in the sentence.

>was-//

Please use a proper dash. This is a recurring issue.

>she poured//

Extraneous space.

>burden to bare//

bear

>The heat of the water held her tightly and she wasn't quite ready to let go just yet.//

Here's the opposite comma issue. There are two subjects, and each gets its own verb, so you'll normally put a comma between the clauses. These are intermittent issues.

>Stepping into the kitchen//

This is the third time already you've used this same phrasing, and the previous one was only a paragraph back.

>An hour an a half//

Typo.

I'll pause a moment here to say you're attempting something very tricky. I get that you want to create the feeling that Twilight is slogging through her day, and there's a temptation to make the narrative sound detached and bored. The problem is that it's really hard to keep that from boring the reader. It's often better to show that the emotionless exterior has a contrast in what's going on beneath the surface. It creates tension which can keep the story moving forward. Yes, making the story sound like dull routine can draw the reader into Twilight's mindset. It can also make the story completely uninteresting to read.

>today's sense of dread//

See, this is what I was talking about. There are stronger emotions lurking below the surface, and you've been using the kind of narrator who will speak Twilight's thoughts for her. So why not now? You're just telling me she has a sense of dread, which doesn't get me to feel it with her. What kinds of comments might the narrator make to convey this instead?

>as if it were a breath of fresh air//

So make the narrative tone sound like this is refreshing.

>That was the real thing that irritated her.//

So make the narrative tone sound irritated. These are the kinds of emotional underpinnings this story really needs.

>the one//

Extraneous space.

>completion based//

Hyphenate.

>How am I?//

See, her own thoughts here run contrary to her behavior. Again, show that contrast, that her exterior is controlled but her interior is in pain. You're at least getting to it with quoted thought, but a balanced approach is more effective, where you also show it through the narrative tone and her behavior.

>the alicorn said//

Keep in mind you've been using a limited narrator firmly in Twilight's perspective. Describing her this way implies that Twilight would describe herself this way, which is strange.

>in a joking tone//

Don't be so direct. Mention that she laughs or how she acts.

>Dear you do know that I was joking//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>her friend//

Another external descriptor that doesn't quite mesh with being in Twilight's perspective.

>Rarity studied the expression that Twilight wore.//

Twilight's got her eyes closed. How does she see this?

>Alright, Darling.//

Why would "darling" be capitalized here? It's just a generic term of endearment.

>Rarity asked her friend//

Another of these external references.

Note how in this interaction with Rarity, you;re showing Twilight much more in conflict than when she was alone. This is a much more compelling part of the story as a result. And you're not relying solely on her quoted thoughts to get her mood across. You're providing narrative content and character actions to imply and reinforce what she's thinking. This section is much stronger on emotional engagement.

>over indulge//

Hyphenate that or make it one word.

>it's loving embrace//

Its/it's confusion.

>Anger swelled in her chest//

Don't tell me she's angry. Make her act angry, and make the narrator sound angry.

>People care about me.//

Ponies, right?

>As she turned over and let her body become fully limp.//

Not sure why you've made this a separate sentence fragment. An "as" clause synchronizes actions, but you've given it nothing to synchronize with.

>I just be//

Typo.

You know, this is a good depiction of what depression feels like. And it's not readily apparent to someone who hasn't been there. I suspect this story will come across as fairly boring to people who have never been depressed and more engaging to those who have.

That said, I think the beginning comes across as kind of dull anyway. You do a good job toward the end of showing that dichotomy between her outward appearance and inner turmoil. It's coming to a head there, but showing some signs of it from the beginning will make it much more interesting, and of course the beginning is the part where you need to hook the reader.

I'm left a little curious about her interaction with those fillies, too. Were they thrilled to spend time with a princess? Did they react like something was off about her?

Last thing I'll say is that you have more "to be" verbs in the story than are probably ideal. They're inherently boring verbs, since nothing happens. On the one hand, the story is kind of about stagnation, so they might seem to fit thematically, but that just gets back to my argument about that being really hard to do while keeping the story from boring the reader. So you might want to try rephrasing some of those with more active verbs if you can.

Other than that, there were just some assorted editing things and a few perspective slips. I can definitely see posting this if you get those few things cleared up. It's close enough that you can mark it as "back from Mars."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2038

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

In the introduction, you use an awful lot of dashes. Some of them wouldn't even need to be dashes. But more to the point, things like this easily stand out when overused, and you don't want writing tics to be the thing the reader remembers about your story.

The only other thing I'd say about this chapter is that I don't see any reason why you'd need to obscure who the narrator is. It'd be nice if you identified that up front. Oh, and there's no reason to have the whole thing in italics. They're for making things stand out, and when everything stands out, nothing does. They're best kept to short passages anyway, as italics quickly get irritating to read.

>but, it does happen//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used right. You actually had a couple in the previous chapter. But this one isn't.

The Age 0 chapter kind of has the same things going on as the introduction, but here it's semicolons instead of dashes. One of my biggest takeaways was that I saw a ton of them. You don't want that rivaling the plot and characters as what someone remembers.

>She snuggled a little deeper into Pinkie’s side, and gave a little sigh that made Twilight’s heart absolutely melt.//

Watch the commas. Here, the same subject performs both verbs, so there's no need for one; it's all a single clause. Also note that the emphasis you put on that last word lends a conversational tone, effectively pulling this into the realm of a limited narrator who can express Twilight's thoughts for her, whereas your narration to that point had sounded more omniscient than anything.

>Martha...”--then//

Don't use both an ellipsis and a dash. They mean opposite things.

>Pinkie looked up and beamed.//

Here's the narrator sounding limited again, and whoever's opinion it's supposed to represent, it isn't Pinkie's. That means the perspective character leaves, but the camera stays behind with Pinkie. That's fine to transition to her, and it wasn't abrupt, but there's still a bit of a disconnect in not having that perspective established, if indeed there was supposed to be one.

>And, if she had anything to do with it--those lives were all gonna be super-duper aweso-mazing.//

See, here's just one example of a dash that really doesn't need to be there. How is this a break in her train of thought? That could easily be a comma.

>dinged//

Just put that in regular font. It's a valid word, and sound effects like that only tend to work in certain story tones. Same goes for the rest of them.

I have to ask why you titled the story "Whiskey" and mentioned that as one of her foals' names in the synopsis when the story uses "Waltz."

>The manager of the grocery store//

You ought to establish where this is earlier. You've already had Pinkie walk through a door, and for all I know, she's still at the hospital. So I already have a mental image going when you throw this at me, and I have to revise things.

>all?//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark attached to an italicized word, you'll usually include it in the italics.

>“When she has the money for it,” He said.//

Capitalization.

>“And, lately…” she shrugged.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>she said sadly//

Don't just tell me she's sad. Paint a picture. Demonstrate it to me.

>...two weeks//

If it's not picking up from an earlier suspended sentence, capitalize after a leading ellipsis.

>part time//

Hyphenate.

>well…” she smiled crookedly//

Another non-speaking action used as an attribution.

>“I can do it!” She said//

Capitalization.

>She trailed off//

I can already tell that from your use of an ellipsis. You don't need to repeat it in the narration.

>“I can’t just…” she gestured vaguely. “...give//

It looks like you're trying to put a narrative aside in a quote. Here's how. Pay attention to the patterns of capitalization and punctuation.
“I can’t just—” she gestured vaguely “—give
This dash placement means she stops speaking for the action. If there's no break, then do it like this:
“I can’t just”—she gestured vaguely—“give
Also note that you have a mix of ellipses. Some are a single character, and others are three separate dots. Try to make them consistent. You could do a search and replace of one for the other.

>Twilight swallowed, past the lump in her throat//

Not really a reason to have that comma.

>She took another step forward, and pulled Pinkie Pie in for a hug.//

There's an example of a spot where you don't need the comma. It's all one clause—Twilight performs both actions.

>and began to rub Pinkie’s back//

That's the second "begin" action in this paragraph. Besides being repetitive, this is a verb that should be avoided as much as possible. Any given action begins, so it's pretty redundant to point that out, unless the beginning is worth noting for some reason, like it's abrupt, or the action never finishes.

>“Feel any better?” She asked.//

Capitalization. You're really intermittent about getting this right, and I don't see a pattern to when you mess it up, so I don't know what the hang-up is.

>“I know, but…” she shrugged.//

Non-speaking action used as an attribution.

>kind-of//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>She shrugged//

There's a lot of shrugging going on.

>Twilight repeated again.//

But Twilight hasn't said it before.

>hoof?//

Include the question mark in the italics.

>she said, hesitantly//

You just had her hesitate. Besides, these mood/emotion adverbs are a sign that you should be demonstrating how she feels instead of telling me.

>Pinkie hesitated a moment//

And just a paragraph later, she hesitates again. The character actions get quite repetitive in this chapter.

>I--” she stopped suddenly, then swallowed.//

Non-speaking action used as an attribution.

>“Pinkie,” Twilight said, “Ever//

By transitioning out of the quote and back in with commas, you're saying the quote is one continuous sentence. So why are you capitalizing in the middle of it?

>Please,” she said, “Give me a chance to return the favor.”//

And that would mean you have two dialogue tags on the same quote, and identical tags to boot. Then you have the same capitalization error again.

>“Come on,” she said, “Let’s take care of you.”//

And again. This is another one where you get it right intermittently, so I don't know what the problem is.

>She smiled a little wider, and held a hoof to her mouth//

Unnecessary comma.

Man, it's even worse in the "Age 2" chapter. There are so many unnecessary dashes that don't accomplish anything a comma wouldn't.

>“Maybe even rent out the place for parties or something.//

Missing your closing quotes.

I'm going to cut down on the detailed stuff from now on, because it's just going to be more of the same. I'll identify new issues, but I trust you can pick up what needs fixing from the numerous examples I've given you on the prior stuff and find the rest of those yourself.

>Twilight had learned to leave checks left in unobtrusive places//

Has she verified that Pinkie's actually depositing them?

>‘em//

Note that smart quotes always draw leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can copy and paste an apostrophe in, or you can fool smart quotes by typing two single quotes in a row, then deleting the first.

>“Get down from there!”//

If the entire quote is italicized, it's fine to include the quotation marks in the italics. Either way works, but don't have one of each.

>Sorry, mama//

As a term of address, family relations get capitalized.

So, for the Age 3 chapter, I'm starting to get an overall feel for the story. At first, you were pretty comprehensive about showing what life was like and having events happen that were all relevant to the plot.

By Age 2, you'r relying on having a single scene represent the entire year. At least in that case, it worked to a degree. You introduced that the other girls were all trying to help her, and you gave most of their efforts as a list while at least showing Twilight's as a live interaction. So this does represent what's become routine, but it's also not the kind of thing that would truly stand for an entire year. It's a single excerpt, and it skips over what would be any notable occurrences. It doesn't even refer to any, like the time Tango got a really high fever or flour prices shot up, etc. So the story is structured to show this growing family, while the individual chapters increasingly show more slice-of-lifey and less impactful things.

And this really coalesces in Age 3. The chapter is a single scene that fills in a little bit of information on how Pinkie's business is going, but it's mostly populated by slice-of-life fluff that doesn't make a point. Her children are getting a little older, which I already gathered from the chapter's title, and we get introduced to the personalities they're developing, but nothing comes of it. They get caught trying to sneak cookies, and... that's it. The vital information I need from this chapter could have been covered in a single paragraph or less. The rest really isn't accomplishing anything.

>Her name’s Waltz, but it’s a little mouthful, so we call her Waltzie.//

So... a one-syllable name is a mouthful? And that's eased by making it into a two-syllable nickname? I don't get it...

>Rarity jerked her head up from where she’d been cooing at little Merriweather.//

Maneuver this paragraph to the top of the page, then look down the page and see how repetitive the structures are here. Your paragraphs are mostly a single line each. Many are a short narrative sentence followed by a short quote. Most of them start with a character's name. With a repeated word, at least it doesn't stand out to you until you encounter it, but this just makes the thing look visually repetitive, so before I've even read it, I expect it to be.

>Hearth's Warming//

>Hearthswarming's//
See the inconsistency? The first is correct.

Age 4 at least goes back to showing something of consequence. It's still a little odd to have a quick fluff scene be representative of an entire year, but we do get filled in on what's happening with everyone, and Pinkie's conflict is extended. Though nothing new is done with it. We already knew what it was, so all that gets added here is that it's still going on. Next chapter will, too, so it calls into question what purpose this chapter really served.

Now we finally get where Whiskey comes from. Well, it originated last chapter, but now we see it's going to be more than a one-off joke. Still, any reader's going to be as confused as I am why her name doesn't match the title or synopsis until we're almost at the end. I'm not sure there's a right answer here. And it's a rather meta wink at the reader that this name just perfectly and coincidentally matches the other two in the NATO phonetic alphabet. That kind of thing can ruin a serious tone.

>She tiptoed into the room and carefully rearranged them.//

All 7 sentences in this paragraph start with "she." So does the only sentence in the next paragraph. So do the first sentences in 6 of the next 7 paragraphs. So do all but one of the non-dialogue sentences in those 7 paragraphs.

You really waited until the last instant to close things off. I was really worried that you'd just let the story peter out without having any sort of conclusion, but there actually was some kind of closure there.

So, this is a sweet story. It shows definite writing talent, and I enjoyed reading. It has a since sentiment, and it leaves off at a good place for a continuation. But it has its share of issues. I've already covered them all, but for a quick recap:

—Lots of repetition in word and phrase usage, paragraph structure at times, and (often unnecessary) dash usage.
—It needs a little attention toward keeping the narrator's perspective consistent.
—Quite a few liberties taken with using non-speaking actions as dialogue attributions.
—General editing.
—A couple of the chapters really take the "slice of life" feel to an extreme, where nothing of consequence happens, and a wholly unimportant moment is taken to be indicative of the entire year. This is particularly true of Age 3 and Age 4. If I skipped those chapters completely, I wouldn't miss anything. Standard principles of writing say they shouldn't exist, then. I'm more tolerant of material that does little more than create atmosphere than most reviewers are, but there are limits. Single scenes, sure, I can excuse them. Entire chapters? That's a lot tougher. What can you do to make these two chapters integral?

These are by no means insurmountable problems. I bet you can get them fixed up.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2062

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Slipping under one of the smaller mess hall tables//

>upending it into and knocking out two of the pursuing inmates//
>Galloping as fast as she could while simultaneously flapping her wings furiously in the hope of flying into the rafters of the mess hall away from her pursuers//
>falling flat on her face//
>knocking the breath out of her//
>Picking herself up//
If there's one big thing aout the writing, it's the vast number of participial phrases you use. Yes, they're descriptive and sophisticated and good for variety, but you don't hear many in everyday conversation, so they stand out easily when used too much. Plus participles have their own risks. Here's one:
>Falling onto her back, her hind legs kicked up into the air//
This is a dangling participle. "Falling onto her back" is presumably supposed to describe Derpy, but she's nowhere to be found in the clause. This explicitly says that her hind legs fell onto her back.

Another issue is that participles synchronize actions, and if you don't intend that, you can end up with a situation where it's not plausible for things to happen at the same time. Or by having so many in a sentence, you cause a whole host of things to synchronize, which just ends up hammering the reader over the head. Take this excerpt:
>Galloping as fast as she could while simultaneously flapping her wings furiously in the hope of flying into the rafters of the mess hall away from her pursuers, Derpy tripped on one of her wings midstride, falling flat on her face.//
You have four actions in this sentence, and all of them happen at once. That's kind of a lot to keep in mind.

>Slipping under one of the smaller mess hall tables, she accidentally overturned it as she emerged from the other end, upending it into and knocking out two of the pursuing inmates.//

We'll revisit this one, too. It says all these things happen at the same time, yet these would actually occur in a sequence.

>pegasi guards//

Noun adjuncts are singular. For example, "ham sandwiches" instead of "hams sandwiches."

>She just laid there//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight.

>Derpy asked with a hopeful expression on her face//

Keep in mind you've had the story in Derpy's perspective. Look how often the narrator speaks her thoughts for her. Yet this statement requires her to see and evaluate her own facial expression. How would she do that? And the emotion itself would be far more immediate to her than doing anything like that anyway.

>the saddened pegasus//

Likewise with the perspective, you're essentially having her describe herself this way, which is weird.

>in anticipation and excitement//

Also look how often you use a phrase like this: "in [emotion]." Besides presuming to feed the reader a conclusion it also is usually redundant with a description already in the sentence, like the wide eyes you mention just before it. Give the reader some credit. Paint a picture, and he can figure this stuff out.

>Celestia is my witness//

Usually phrased with "as."

>personally throw you from this chariot myself//

Redundant.

>“yes’s” and “no’s”//

You don't need the quotes. Just yeses and nos.

>As the young Derpy//

This implies Derpy's watching herself as a filly in the dream instead of being the filly herself. Not sure that's what you intended.

>can’t say I didn’t warn ya sis//

Missing comma for direct address, and a family relation would be capitalized as a term of address. You're really intermittent about remembering direct address commas.

>Dot asked with a concerned countenance//

More and more, you're just telling me how characters feel instead of demonstrating it.

By now, I'd say just set this dream off as a separate scene and lose the italics. It gets irritating to read italics when they go on for too long.

>She’d bit. Now to reel her in.//

So why is Derpy's dream (or memory, as the case may be) getting told from her mother's perspective?

>Derpy slowly digested her mother’s ambiguous words, trying to infer their meaning.//

And now your perspective is jumping back to Derpy. There's no reason to let it waver this much in a limited narration.

>Woah//

Why can't anyone spell this right?

>But there’s nothing out he-//

Please use proper dashes for cutoffs and asides.

>100//

Spell out numbers that short.

>OK//

And spell that out as "okay."

>Derpy examined one of these flags more closely and discovered that it was completely white save for an emblem in the center; a black ring containing three oblong black bars.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete.

>she briefly considered nibbling on a few of the flowers//

You just said she did nibble at them.

>Still she carried on her self-examination, searching the depths of her soul for the answer she was looking for.//

Jeez, you're really hamming this up. Don't make this an existential angst-fest where none is warranted.

>diverse colors that seemed to compliment the multi-colored array//

Unless they had nice things to say, you want "complement."

I have to agree with a lot of what Casca said in his comment on chapter 2. That shouldn't be a surprise, since he's served as a pre-reader for us before. The very long dream sequence doesn't have a payoff in this chapter, and there's not a clear payoff coming from it. It's only tangentially related to what's happening at the time, to boot. Plus all those LUS-type references really start to drag (there's an explanation of them at the top of this thread, if you don't know what that is).

>morni-//

Please use a proper dash for asides or cutoffs. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>Your very identity.”

>
>“This simple creed//
When the same character picks right up again with speech in the next paragraph like this, it's customary to leave the closing quotes off the first one.

>Bitter contempt seeped from Aucune’s words as he continued along with his diatribe, steadily becoming more and more agitated as he spoke.//

I just have to take your word for it that he's exhibiting these emotions. Let me see them.

>somepony that mattered//

For a sentient being, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>and if there was even the slightest chance that this path could lead you to that happiness I think she’d want you to take it//

You have a number of spots like this where there are separate clauses (each subject gets its own verb: there was... I think) that should have a comma between them. Or sometimes, it's the opposite, where you have a comma in a compound predicate that doesn't need to be there, since there aren't multiple clauses. There's a brief discussion of comma usage like this at the top of this thread.

>OK//

Write it out as "okay."

>But Aucune’s demeanor only grew more serious, his frown deepening and furrowing his eyebrows as though he were appraising some perplexing riddle.//

As written, "furrowing his eyebrows" either describes his frown or his demeanor, neither of which makes sense.

>then why does it feel like I’m taking two steps back every day.//

Isn't that a question?

>(except of course for a certain pastry she constantly craved)//

This chapter has sounded far closer to omniscient, but these parenthetical elements tend to draw it closer to limited, and there are a number of places where you have the narrator say things only Aucune could know.

>chemical properties of various chemicals//

Watch the repetition.

>near death//

You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>their clansponies traditionally blood red armor//

Missing an apostrophe.

>By the end of the day//

This paragraph has a lot of "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring, and while it's impractical to remove them all from a story, you should strive to use active verbs where possible. You have ten of them in only six sentences.

>it always seemed that when Derpy was around the chances of somepony getting zapped//

See why the commas between clauses help? Without one, "around" could be a preposition with "the chances" as its object.

>By that point he’d begun to suspect that Derpy was not necessarily fit for the kitchen.//

You've been using Derpy as your perspective character, so what's her evidence of this? As is, you have her reading his mind.

>…//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing.

>cause//

Needs an apostrophe.

By now, I should have found any pervasive problems in the mechanics. I'm not a fast reader, and I'll be at this for weeks if I keep up this level of detail. So I'm just going to skim the rest to see if i find any broad plot or character stumbles.

>The second scene of chapter 4... It's an odd change in perspective, since you'd stuck with Derpy so far. Here, I'm not sure who holds the perspective, but you keep using phrases like "a cerulean pegasus," yet whoever the viewpoint character is should already know everyone here. Why would they use vague descriptors like this instead of names?


>Aucune was suddenly cut off//

Already evident from your choice of punctuation.

In chapter 5, where Aucune is explaining the Order's history, you're really getting expository again. It helps if they're actually doing something while he explains this, so that it breaks it into smaller bits sandwiched between some kind of character action. And you did this to a degree when the explanation started. But the further I get in, the less narration we get, so it devolves into "talking heads" (there's a brief discussion of the concept at the top of this thread). From this:
>Put yourself in their place for a moment, Miss Hooves.//
over the next 5 paragraphs, the sum total of narration we get is this:
>Derpy admitted//
Then you do start introducing character actions again.

>klutz//

This is the preferred spelling, but you had it as "clutz" earlier in the story.

Good night, this scene goes on forever. A full half of this chapter is a huge block of exposition about the Order's history. And it's not all that relevant to what's going on. It's pretty much done to fill time in the story while they climb, and it sure comes across as filler to me as well. I'd bet a significant number of readers skimmed this part if not skipped it altogether. Hopefully, most picked up again after it instead of leaving the story.

>his flustered pupil//

She's held the perspective in this scene, but would she really describe herself this way? That's awfully external sounding. You wouldn't tell someone about your shopping trip and refer to yourself as "the person," would you?

Oh, good, now we get more exposition in the form of Aucune's back story. So about 80% of this chapter is exposition. I've pretty much just scrolled past it. We'll see if it affects my understanding of the story. I'm guessing not, which says a lot about whether it should be here, at least in this extensive a form.

I'm looking through your views by chapter to try illustrating a point, but... this is just bizarre. 1114 views of chapter 2, and 4546 of chapter 3? Why are so many people coming on board in the middle of things? Anyway, that drops to 744 in chapter 4, 708 in chapter 5, and 669 in chapter 6. I was expecting to see a pretty big drop-off after the wall of exposition, but it's actually pretty steady.

Anyway, on to chapter 6.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2063

>>2062
>“Best mom a filly could ask for!”//
They've already had this discussion, right? I remember her saying pretty much that same thing to him, but in a more confrontational way.

And now more exposition, also done in a talking heads manner, this time for Derpy's back story. And it's really, really not necessary to have entire scenes in italics.

>“Nope, just… just my mom.”//

There's nothing that will kill the feeling of authenticity than incredible coincidences. When trying to write sad events, many authors think that lumping even more sad on it or making things more improbable increases their power, yet it often has the opposite effect. Coincidences are a weak thing to lean on. If 10 ponies had died, including her mother, it would be far more plausible than having her be the only one.

>when I realized he wasn’t gonna be there//

And of course her father abandoned her. "Lumping even more sad on it," indeed. We call this "piling on." By the way, where was her dad to begin with? Ditzy could have left her at home with him, but they went to her aunt's, so he must not have been there, but he didn't get a mention. Granted, I'm skimming, so I might have missed something.

>Seriously, that’s what they’d climbed all the way up there for?//

Given that you're willing to have the narrator speak for her, why do you keep presenting quoted thoughts as well? They're more distancing.

>Princess Celestia, the steward of the sun, moon, and stars, ruler of all of Equestria, and protector of all its inhabitants was… grieving.//

And of course the princess wants to make that much of a personal gesture, one so unusual that Derpy had never heard of its like before. It surprised her to no end, after all. You're treading on very Mary Sue-ish grounds here.

>From this day forth, love will be my life//

Hm. Not really the sentiment that Batman has, so we'll see how she applies this while beating up criminals.

>This chapter is dedicated to the 19 members of the Prescott Fire Department's Granite Mountain Hotshots who perished this summer while fighting the Yarnell Hill fire in central Arizona.//

Precisely what I was saying earlier. It's far more relatable to have a disaster that affects multiple people than some huge unprecedented storm that manages to kill only one, and a supremely convenient one at that.

And a long-ish poem. I can appreciate the work that goes into poetry, but unless the actual text of it proves important to the story, you're wasting your time. Keep it short, or readers will scroll right past it. Generally, if it doesn't fit on a single screen so they can see the end coming soon, they'll skip it. Then they analyze the poem, which also doesn't have any relevance to the story. I'm usually pretty forgiving on things that are fairly extraneous to a story. A fluff scene that just creates atmosphere does fine with me, as long as it's not too long relative to the story as a whole. So when even I find this big a chunk of the chapter to be pointless, it's probably a bad sign.

Through this fight scene, the perspective jumps around quite a bit. Brawny's not really a character you care to have the reader identify with, so there's not much reason to go to him. Aucune and Hengst are watching in a pretty sedate manner, so going to them really kills the action, plus they're also not ones that are important to have the reader identify with. This scene should really be about Derpy's experience. You sometimes even inhabit multiple perspectives within a single paragraph, which you definitely shouldn't do.

>Kampfduell, the way I used it, basically means 'martial duel', and no I don't believe this is an actual German word, but eh, it works.//

Well, if you get the adjective ending right. I don't have enough of a German vocabulary to encompass both words, and I'm too lazy to look it up, but I believe it would be something like Kampfenduell or Kampfsduell, instead of just mashing the words together.

Ah, and then we get another chapter that's largely exposition, having other characters sum up all of Derpy's combat masteries. I think most of the story would do fine if all this amounted to "suffice it to say she's good at fighting." I doubt any of these particulars will prove important, but we will see.

>Could you all please give Brother Bitter and I some privacy?//

People are so deathly afraid of misusing "me" that they commonly make this error. "Brother Bitter and I" is nominative case, equivalent to "we." "Brother Bitter and me" is objective case, equivalent to "us." Which sounds correct, "give we" or "give us"?

>snuggly//

This is not the same thing as "snugly."

>what the buck is this//

Given that canon uses it as an innocent term, "buck" is a pretty poor choice of curse word. As long as they're only occasional, you can get away with real ones and not risk needing a mature tag.

>Charming was very discrete//

Odds are that he's always this way. In other words, you want "discreet."

>You could’ve heard a pin drop in that moment.//

Who's holding the perspective here? And why is he speaking to the reader? That's a can of worms I'm sure you don't want to open, since you're very deep into a story that hasn't been doing this so far. It's a whole lot easier to get rid of this than to go back and add everything that would be needed to justify it.

>exasperated, frustrated, and just a touch genuinely sad//

You're feeding me an awful lot of emotional information that you don't bring alive by letting me see it.

In this confrontation between Bitter and Hengst, your perspective wanders back and forth between them several times. At least it isn't abrupt, but I also don't see why it's necessary. What are we getting from Bitter's perspective that's vital information? If I skipped his limited narration, it wouldn't impair my understanding of the story.

>whorse//

If you want people to take this seriously, being cutesy isn't going to help.

>Lightning beckoned two of her own students.//

Normally, with that verb you have a "to" or a direction: "beckoned to them" or "beckoned them over."

>battered Bitter//

That's the kind of playful alliteration I'd expect to see in a children's story, not a dark-ish adventure.

>His furor finally simmering down//

You sure you didn't mean "fury"?

Now we get several paragraphs of exposition about anti-changeling measures. At least there's not much of it, but you can mix it in with what's happening instead of delivering it as a solid block.

While Derpy's describing what happened to her to the folks in Ponyville, I'm surprised nobody notices (or she doesn't bring up as proof of her experience) that she's in very good physical condition, so she's obviously been in training, and her eyes aren't crooked anymore.

Nothing really happens in chapter 13. I'm more forgiving than most when it comes to reading scenes that do nothing but create atmosphere, but that's usually limited to single scenes. You've got a whole chapter here that I could skip, and it wouldn't affect my understanding of the story at all. Nothing here is important. There's no development of the story's conflict or the characters. Can you do something with this chapter that makes it integral to the story, so that removing it harms the whole? At least I can tell Time Turner will become important later on, but there's no tension set up around him yet. He's just there, so there's no impetus pushing toward the payoff.

Now I'm on chapter 14, and are you sure the story isn't going off the rails? We went through many thousands of words giving Derpy the motivation and training necessary to fulfill the story's title, yet for the last several chapters, we're just wading through a bunch of low-stakes slice-of-life stuff without getting any updates on what Aucune and his ponies are doing to try and find her.

Let me explain it another way. There are two good ways to end a chapter: make it feel like a plot point has wrapped up or leave on a cliffhanger. If your story is long enough that it likely has multiple subplots, you can actually do both, and that's the most effective. You want a good mix anyway, but the wrap-up ending is especially viable while a different plot thread is held in a cliffhanger. But we've had a bunch of soft chapter endings in a row, and the other thread about Aucune looking for her didn't end with much tension, so it's not compelling me to find out what happens with it. This is less common in novels, but you do see shorter fiction just constantly interspersing both plot lines throughout, pretty evenly.

I do like that we're finally seeing some of the Batman mythos seep in, where the town's being set up as a stand-in for Gotham. So you had a lull there of a few chapters, and I guess it's not too much of a surprise that readership really dropped off for these last few, but once again, the profile of views per chapter has me baffled. The last one with Aucune in it rates only about 330 views, then you drop to 250, back up over 500 for the last "Home Sweet Home" one, then well under 200 for the final three. I don't really know what to make of it.

Anyway, back to why we've gone so long without a sighting of Aucune or one of his followers. Derpy's been back in Ponyville for a while now. She hasn't done anything to make herself hard to find. She went right back to her old home and tried to resume her old life. For one thing, that makes it pretty improbable none of the have tracked her down so far. And for another, she doesn't wonder if any of them will come? And if so, she's not concerned about it, since she's not keeping a low profile? I could buy that, at least, but it bears mentioning, I think.

>clearly-tipsy//

Two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb don't need hyphens.

>Uh, let me go and not tell mom about this?//

When family relations are used as names, they get capitalized, so this should be "Uh, let me go and not tell Mom about this?" If you'd used it more generically, it wouldn't be capitalized, like "Uh, let me go and not tell my mom about this?"

>ninety-percent//

No reason to hyphenate that.

So it took me nearly two weeks to read this, and most of that was skimming anyway. The characters and plot are fine here. I'd divide the two main issues into mechanical and pacing.

The mechanical (grammar, punctuation, etc.) are things I at least pointed out examples of for every kind of problem I saw, and of course I'm never going to have the kind of time it'd take to pick through every chapter in that much detail. So I don't have anywhere close to a full catalog of what needs fixing, but I hope you can apply those examples to the full story.

The other issue is pacing, where there are big chunks of story devoted to exposition or unimportant things that have little impact on the plot. Then fairly momentous things are over in a few paragraphs, while slice-of-life moments get stretched out for thousands of words. Look at it this way: You're well over 100k words in, and what's happened so far? Derpy goes through a bunch of training (which takes more than half the story), she goes back home to really nothing happening, we see how the town's changed in that time, which tends to support a Batman atmosphere, and only in the final scene does any sort of villain appear. And that's it, he's just there. His appearance isn't linked to the changes in the town, like he's a product of that. So it just kind of starts instead of flowing from one into the other. Addressing that would help the larger problem a little.

Basically, you're 122k words in, and so little of consequence has happened. You're really asking the reader to stay for a very slow ride, and while there was a conflict arc about Derpy dealing with her mother's death, it's a relatively short piece of this, and the rest has so little tension that there's not a lot pushing things forward. Then by the time a villain actually gets involved, it's pretty disconnected from all that. Between the slow-burning slice of life stuff and the amount of unimportant exposition, the story could have covered everything it has so far in a small fraction of the word count, and i wouldn't be surprised if many readers either skimmed to get the gist of things or just decided not to keep up. Despite all the weirdness of the views by chapter, the latest installments are still down much further compared to the peak value than usual for a chaptered story. I'd wager that's why, but there's no way to know for sure, short of asking individual readers.

It being two weeks after I started reading, I don't have a convenient mental checklist of what issues to make sure I should reiterate at the end, so I'll just look back through my notes and see. Aside from a lot of filler, there were problems with general editing, stylistic things like perspective consistency and repetitive structures, an overly maudlin story about Derpy's mother, and some blunt presentation of character emotions.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2065

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>It feels like every time I visit you, all you ever think about what's on your clipboard and when you'll be paid.//

Missing word.

I get that this is a one-sided view of things, and just because Sweetie Belle thinks the doctor is incompetent doesn't mean he is, but it seems odd that she's freely willing to talk about her problem in a letter, and either he won't listen or won't even let her say it during a session. And if that's the case, that she hasn't told Rarity or her parents or whoever's paying him, especially given how long this has been going on. So I already have a credibility problem.

If she's unwilling to talk about it, she wouldn't be mad at him for not letting her. But if she is willing and he's not letting her, then she's proactive about seeking help, so why would she stand for it this long? Something's not making sense.

>(hey, where else would she get one?)//

She's supposedly writing an angry letter to her doctor, so why would she include levity? I can already see a format issue as well. Is this supposed to still be part of the letter? This excerpt sure implies that she has an audience. Yet you're writing this much more like a flashback that the letter led into. If it is a flashback, whom is she addressing here? If this is still the text of the letter, then consider how she would actually write that. This is months later. How would she remember conversations verbatim to the point she could record it as quoted dialogue? It's inconsistent with the concept of a letter.

>I sighed, walking into her room.//

>I said, stepping onto the platform.//
>Rarity wraps a length of light pastel cloth around my middle, pinning it in place with a bit of lace.//
>she said, unpinning the cloth from my waist.//
>I asked, confused//
In the stretch these come from, this represents the majority of the narrative sentences and about half the sentences overall. See how often you tack a participial phrase on the end? It's structurally repetitive, and that stands out more when it's something you don't normally encounter in conversation. Also note that the third one lapses into present tense. This overuse of participles and wavering tense turn up throughout the story.

>The breezy, almost translucent lavender dress she wears appears to be blowing in a nonexistent wind.//

Sweetie Belle's also pretty inconsistent at what maturity level her language indicates. These are fairly advanced words, yet she also continually misses the grammar on things like "me and my friends."

>The Picture Perfect Pony//

An article's part of a larger work, so it would be in quotation marks, not italics.

>Beet//

Why is that capitalized?

>smoothies???//

One question mark is plenty.

>good." I counter//

Punctuation. You only intermittently get this right. When you go from a quote to a speech tag, if the quote ends in a period, you change the period to a comma.

>Bloom//

>Belle//
When have they ever used these as nicknames?

>(pant, pant)//

Sound effects usually don't work well in narration. For a story with a serious tone like this, it's better to describe the sound, but if you actually intend this to still be the letter, than means Sweetie Belle is actually writing these out, which is strange.

>eat as many plums and olives as possible//

Wouldn't that be counterproductive? Even if those are healthy food choices, eating too many of them won't help.

>Why-why//

Please use proper dashes.

>in front of people//

Ponies, right?

There's somewhat of a lack of narration during the conversations. Think about how often you're talking to someone, and all the nonverbal cues you read to decide how they feel about what's happening. When you have a lack of narration, you skimp on those kinds of things, and they're what bring dialogue alive. And when you do indicate emotion, you sometimes directly tell the reader what emotion it is instead of getting him to interpret it from those cues. There's a brief discussion of this under "talking heads" at the top of this thread.

I have to say, so far I'm siding with the other two Crusaders. I don't understand why this is such an obsession for Sweetie Belle. She's upset that she weighs more than the other two, and she's idealizing that picture of a model, plus she thinks she's reading a cue that Rarity thinks she's too big. Yet little of her emotion is actually being demonstrated. As a first-person narrator, she's uniquely positioned to show me her inner turmoil, yet aside from her assuring me it's upsetting her, I'm not seeing any signs of it. Where are her comments that the model looks just perfect, and she's a failure if she doesn't represent that ideal to Rarity, and how it just makes her feel filthy that she's so grossly overweight? She sounds more like someone who's adhering to this diet as a school assignment, not someone who feels like she's worthless without it.

>Why couldn't they just stick with me on this?//

You're on the right track here—I get that she's upset with her friends, but she seems far more upset that they're not going along with her than there's something wrong with her. Give her at least as much passion about her self-image. It all comes on so suddenly, and then it's not really supported by her thoughts.

You really like those multiple exclamation marks and question marks. Really, one is plenty. You're also inconsistent about italicizing them when they're on an italicized word. Normally, you'll include them in the italics.

>I log up to my room//

Typo? That isn't a usage I'm familiar with.

>I hurry the the bathroom//

Typo.

It's always odd to see quoted or italicized thoughts in a very limited or first-person narration, since the perspective already gives the reader access to the character's thoughts directly. What does it add to present those as such thoughts instead of having the narration say them for her? There are times it works, but you need to be cognizant of it so you're making an informed choice, and I don't believe you are. You need to gain something by presenting them that way, because they come at the cost of extra distance between the character and reader.

>A few days after the fight, Scootaloo, Apple Bloom and I made up.//

This scene does a much better job of making her sound dissatisfied with herself, but it doesn't quite go far enough. It's not just what she narrates but how she narrates it. So look at this excerpt:
>When I walked, my back legs squished together; my skin jiggled around when I moved; my belly was suddenly one big paunch. I felt sick whenever I looked in the mirror.//
That covers the right subject matter, but it sounds so factual, like she knows it's true because the math says so, not because she really feels it. Make her narration sound upset, use some more evocative word choice.

>Sweet Celestia, I was fat.//

This is a step in the right direction. With the emphasis on that word, it adds some emotion to what she's saying. Do more of this kind of thing. You've had her get much more passionate about her frustration with her friends. Why not here as well? You had her emphasizing lots of words, asking questions, and shouting in the narration. That's how you show an intense internal emotional state. Notice also how you go about 5 paragraphs here doing things more as a narrative summary. If a letter feel is really what you want, this is far more consistent with that.

>she was too wrapped up in her boutique to notice the amount of weight I'd lost//

This seems a little curious, as Rarity seemed to be one of the ponies whose approval she was seeking. Wouldn't she want Rarity to notice, presumably in order to compliment her?

>with it's delicious smells and fragrances//

Its/it's confusion. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>It had felt so good to be loved and appreciated by my classmates, that I had started eating meals without throwing them up.//

That seems odd, since that wasn't the reason she had started doing that. Whether the other kids approve of her has nothing to do with whether she looks like Fleur de Lis.

>having to flush several times to avoid overflow//

That's... not really possible. A stomach can't hold that much.

>Hospital//

>Doctor//
Why are those capitalized? The first wouldn't ever be, and the second only if it was attached to a name or effectively used as a name.

>The next half and hour was devoted to me telling him all the details of April 1st, and how my obsession with weight began.//

So she told all this to the doctor, but she hadn't told her therapist before now? Wouldn't the therapist have access to this? Or couldn't she have authorized the doctor to release it to him? It's odd that the whole point of the story is that she's finally revealing all this to the therapist when she's already told someone else.

>T-this//

This goes under the same category as sound effects. If you want things to look silly, they can be fine, but in a serious story just describe how she says it. It's more important to create a visual image. How does Dash behave when she says it? Also consider what sound she'd actually repeat in the stutter. That word doesn't actually have a "t" sound in it.

>looking concerned//

Demonstrate things like this. There are lots of ways a character can act or appear to make them seem concerned. Don't put it on me to decide which one. Describe how she looks and what she's doing without using any emotion words, and let me decide on her mood from that. There's a section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread that gives the rationale behind it.

>'get//

You never close that single quote.

>Come one girls//

Typo.

So now several medical staff as well as Rarity and all her friends know what Sweetie Belle's problem is, and the therapist still somehow didn't? It's really stretching credulity.

>a letter with chapters//

Now you're being rather meta. You're also undercutting the seriousness. Why would she care if it had chapters? And why would she even organize it as having chapters? A letter would just be one continuous thing. If you wanted to structure the story as an intro of writing the letter, then flashbacks of the events, then returning to the letter at the end, it makes more sense to have multiple chapters, but if you want the whole thing to actually be a letter, then it doesn't make sense to structure it as separate chapters, unless they're separate letters. You're really hurting the authenticity here.

>Maybe it's a good thing that I was sent to see you.//

Now I'm really confused. The beginning of the story sure made it sound like Sweetie Belle had fully acknowledged her problem to herself, but for some reason, the therapist had prevented her from telling him about it. Now you've switched over to sounding like she was initially mad at him for wanting her to realize she had a problem she was unwilling to admit. You need a consistent message on this. The whole reason she wrote this letter was framed as telling him something he hadn't given her an opportunity to.

>What do you want Diamond?//

Missing comma for direct address.

>I can just take the pill and go, sis.//

Family relations get capitalized when used as names or terms of address.

Okay, summing up time. There were a number of editing issues, and I've pointed out at least one example of each, but I didn't come close to an exhaustive list, so just take those and apply them to the rest of the story. Stylistically, the only problems were a tendency to be blunt with emotions (which may not actually be a problem—I'll get to that in a moment), to eschew narration at times during conversations, and to waver between past and present tense.

The bigger things are more abstract. First, Sweetie's voicing changes a lot during the story. She sounds far more angry in chapter 4 than chapter 2, for instance, and there's no reason presented for her to be. At first, I thought it might be because you were trying to have the tone match how serious her condition was, so she sounds more normal early on, when she's still relatively unaffected, then later on, she sounds less controlled and more prone to outbursts when her condition is much worse. That will tie into how you want to present the story, which I'll discuss next.

Like I said, I can't tell whether the main body of the story is supposed to still be text from the letter or flashbacks cued by Sweetie Belle's reminiscence of what she's writing about. But it comes across as some weird hybrid. It's not written like a letter would be. I mentioned how you wouldn't expected to see quoted dialogue in a letter, and I'll also include the way you add emphasis. How would she differentiate between italics and normal font? One's printed and one's in cursive? If you wanted to emphasize something in handwriting, how would you do it? Probably either my making it heavy and dark (bold font), underlining it, or putting it in capital letters. The way the story is written makes it feel like a standard narrative. The tone, the way you present the information, the way you have explicit pieces of letter formatted differently, the way her narration becomes more intense through the story. But there are other clues that the whole thing is supposed to be a letter, in how self-aware she is of what's going on, like it's being told in hindsight. But if that's the case, she wouldn't have a change of mood as the story progresses, since it's all written after everything but some of the therapy has happened.

You could even try tying her changing narrative tone to her increased frustration toward what she thinks is ineffective therapy, but that's pretty difficult to do. Right now, I don't even get a clue that that's what might be happening until right at the end of the story, which is also where I get the first inkling that the different chapters were written at different times. And even with that, I have no idea how much time has elapsed between letters. You might do better to have these as separate letters; as it is, I think it was a mistake to cut in with a short, explicit letter passage in the middle of things.

Dr. Stone is supposed to be some kind of villain here, but he never comes across as an effective one, because it's never clear he's done anything wrong. There's evidence both ways. If he were really that poor a doctor, he wouldn't have much clientele, and word would get around, particularly to the doctor who recommended him in the first place. Plus Rarity wouldn't keep paying for therapy that wasn't doing anything. Really, the only indication that he's not doing perfectly fine is Sweetie Belle's dissatisfaction, but even that isn't clear. She's not in a great position to judge that, and with everything so vague, the reader's not going to be able to tell, either. I'm also surprised that Rarity's okay with halting therapy altogether instead of trying to find another therapist. Sweetie Belle at first indicated she was mad she never got to tell her story, so her only recourse is to do so through this letter, but it's not clear that she ever tried. It's not like she was ordered to stay silent unless asked a question, and then could only answer within the specific scope of the question. What was preventing her from volunteering this information? All I can tell is she doesn't like his manner.

All this comes together into feeling like the story doesn't have much of a resolution. Sweetie Belle's condition certainly doesn't, and that's fine; I take it that one of the points of the story is that this will be a long-term thing that may never go away. But it's left that she's halting therapy, and... nothing. She's clearly not cured, but she's without a means of making progress anymore—she's already been shown as relapsing into purging, so she can't be trusted to manage it on her own. And without having any specific reason to blame Dr. Stone, there's not a resolution that she's in a better place for being rid of him, either. So the story just feels suspended at the end without having any closure. Open endings are fine, but they work by suggesting the multiple paths open to her and attaching stakes to each. And this story doesn't leave off that way. That's what's often meant when people say a story didn't so much end as it stopped.

Let me make an overly simple example to illustrate what I mean. Say at the end, Rarity gives Sweetie Belle a brochure for a different therapist, one that she asked around to get recommendations for instead of just taking the original doctor's referral blindly. So Sweetie Belle agrees to take it to her room and look at it. It's still left open as to whether she'll agree to go, but there's a clear divergent path laid out, and there are emotional stakes for both her and Rarity tied to which option she chooses. That's the kind of thing that makes for an effective open ending.

Finally, I'll say that this was a powerful story. One thing critics often don't do is say what went right with a story, and this venue isn't really structured for that, since we're not publishing our reviews, but I thought you did a good job of presenting Sweetie Belle's mindset, the way everyone else relates to her, and the implication that her problems are far from over at the end. I also appreciate you didn't take the common direction of having Twilight, who somehow is a master of all possible topics, be her therapist. I talked early on about how Sweetie Belle's narration sounded awfully bland in chapter 2, but by chapter 4, you were much more effective at relating her mood through how the narration said things (and I also talked about whether that was a reasonable progression, based on whether you saw the whole story as a letter or as a letter framing device leading to flashbacks). You do create the genuine feel of someone in pain, and the sentence flow is good.

Questions, Replies, And Defenses Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2068

>>2038

First off, thanks so much for taking the time to write these suggestions out! I really appreciate the effort.

As I said in my email, I had a couple questions.

General:

First, I generally agree with your remarks about mechanics, editing, etc. (Google docs does this weird, auto-captialization thing I caught sometimes, but not, apparently, others. I'll go back over it again). However, I was surprised by how you objected to using actions in dialog tags; I felt that was fairly common, acceptable practice. Personally, I like it, and I plan on keeping such tags in place (I feel it leads to a little more dynamic text), but would you mind explaining the problem a little better?

Also, you mentioned that some chapters seemed "too slice of life," and that these scenes were too short to cover a whole year. My intent was to show growth over time, not to exhaustively catalog everyone's lives--that's why the story is told in short snippets, and why I tried to include at least a little snapshot of everyone's lives in each chapter (with mixed success, apparently?). I also tried hard to make sure each chapter contributed to the plot or the worldbuilding in some way: for example, you especially criticized chapter 3 in this regard, which I intended to a) establish the kid's personalities, and b) show that things have progressed for Pinkie's business.

Knowing that, do you have any suggestions for making the chapters work a little better for you? That is, can you think of how I could write these "snapshots" to resolve your concerns with continuity, etc., while preserving the same general structure?

>[Introdcution] I don't see any reason why you'd need to obscure who the narrator is


My intent that the narrator was "everyone"--that is, all of Ponyville, like in the (non-pony) short story, "A Rose For Emily," in which the "we" represents the town as a whole. I'm guessing that wasn't clear...?

EDIT: I'm realizing this wasn't as clear as I was hoping. I think I'm going to take a leaf from A Rose for Emily, and explicitly describe the narrator as "Everyone" in, like the first paragraph.

> [Chapter 1] the perspective character leaves, but the camera stays behind with Pinkie


To me, this feels like a natural shift--but, then again, you're not the first to say this. Do you have any suggestions for how to signal the perspective shift, outside of "HEY GUISE WE'RE FOLLOWING PINKIE AROUND NOW LOL"?

>"Waltz" --> "Whiskey"


If you don't mind, I'd like to brainstorm about this a bit.

Again, you're not the first to bring up this disconnect between the fic's title and Waltz/Whiskey's name. At the same time, though, I like what I have written--her given name is "Waltz" (to tie in with her siblings' names, which are also dances--not to mention their father's identity as a skilled dancer), but she's also feisty enough that I love the name "Whiskey" for her.

In the fic, if you recall, Waltz is her given name, but Whiskey is a nickname: Waltz-->Waltzie-->Whiskey. However, that transition has thrown off more than one reader, and, though this change comes fairly early in the overall plot arc, it comes very late in this particular fic.

Do you have any thoughts for how to resolve this? Again, I would love to keep her name as it is--given name "Waltz," nickname "Whiskey"--but, short of moving the scene with Rarity in the cafe up significantly, I don't know what else to do. (Like, Twilight could perhaps mis-hear, instead of Rarity... but Twilight was there when Pinkie named her, and, as such, would make it harder for her to misinterpret, I think)

...I think that's about all I have. The impression I get from your comments is that, outside of some of the issues mentioned above (especially the chapter structure), most of your criticisms are (mostly) fine-tooth comb issues. My life is super-busy right now, but hopefully within the next week or two, I'll be able to submit another, more polished draft.

Thanks again for your help!
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2072

>>2068
>Google docs does this weird, auto-captialization thing I caught sometimes
I started noticing that recently in my own writing and had to wrestle with it, so I think it's a relatively new "feature." I found it in the preferences menu and disabled it.

>However, I was surprised by how you objected to using actions in dialog tags; I felt that was fairly common, acceptable practice. Personally, I like it, and I plan on keeping such tags in place (I feel it leads to a little more dynamic text), but would you mind explaining the problem a little better?

It all goes to syntax. The speech is a grammatical object that serves as the direct object of a speaking verb, if there is one. This can also lead to disputes over what constitutes a proper speaking verb, as one would have to be transitive to serve this purpose. So if you have something like this:
"I gotta go," he ran out the door.
the speech doesn't serve a grammatical function. To keep that same wording, you'd have to make them separate sentences:
"I gotta go." He ran out the door.
But you can also tack the action on after a speaking verb:
"I gotta go," he said as he ran out the door.
"I gotta go," he said, running out the door.
"I gotta go," he said, and ran out the door.
So the short answer is that having only an action tag is improper grammar.

>do you have any suggestions for making the chapters work a little better for you?

I did get that you were only trying to give me little updates on how the family was doing, but to pick on chapter 3 some more, it doesn't show me anything that I don't also get from chapter 5. Getting to know the children is fine, but they're not really important to the story so far, so it diesn't accomplish something vital. The fact that they exist is important, as it's what drives the story, but what they're like doesn't make much difference. It's fine for a chapter to delve into that on top of some important plot advancement, but when it's all that's there, it's more filler than anything. And no, you don't have to give me every detail of what's happened in the past year, but the fact that you chose this scene to represent it needs to mean something. You're essentially saying that this bit of interaction encapsulates the plot development of an entire year, and there really isn't any. Her business is doing okay, but we haven't been led to believe there was much danger of it not doing so. Developing the personalities of her children doesn't serve an end at this point, either, since they don't do anything important. By the time their personalities do matter, it's Age 5, and we get the same information chapter 3 presented, which makes chapter 3's use of it redundant.

So one thing I suggested was alluding to other little conflicts that had occurred throughout each year, like a business problem or one of the kids' illness. That shows there's a larger world outside of what's strictly happening right in the chapter's tea party or other interaction. The sense of it being an insular, self-contained scene is also adding to that sense that the plot is stagnating in those chapters, since nothing presented in them matters much, and they're not implying anything else happened that year. A chapter should advance the plot, after all, and those couple of chapters don't really. You're holding them up as the touchstone of "this was the defining moment of the year," and they don't fulfill that. So take one of your plot threads ("Pinkie learns to accept help from her friends," "Pinkie wrestles with acknowledging who the father is," etc.) and have something new happen with at least one of them that doesn't get duplicated in a later chapter.

>I think I'm going to take a leaf from A Rose for Emily, and explicitly describe the narrator as "Everyone" in, like the first paragraph.

I really took the narrator as Twilight, since she's the first character in the story to hold a perspective, and the introduction didn't say anything that would be out of place in her perspective.

>To me, this feels like a natural shift--but, then again, you're not the first to say this.

It's not that the shift occurs at all. If it's important to you to have the camera stay behind with Pinkie after the previous viewpoint character has left, it's fine to do so. The trick is to make sure 1) we get information from her perspective that couldn't be delivered effectively from the previous character (you're fine here, since the perspective character left, thouh you could possibly consider having her stay and keeping the perspective with her, if it's appropriate to the situation), 2) you transition smoothly (I'll get to this in a minute, but you didn't have a problem with that, either), and 3) you stay there long enough to justify the shift.

If I copy out my original comment on this spot:
"That's fine to transition to her, and it wasn't abrupt, but there's still a bit of a disconnect in not having that perspective established, if indeed there was supposed to be one."

So you're fine on why you did the shift, and it wasn't done in a jerky manner. Tha third one's a tad of a hang-up, since you only keep her perspective for three paragraphs, but you get some leeway for finishing out the scene this way. It's more common to do this in comedies, but it can work here, too. My real issue is that you didn't have a clear perspective established before the shift. Let me pull out a few excerpts to illustrate.

>Twilight heard steps behind her on the linoleum.//

You're not showing me how an observer would know she heard this (having her prick her ears toward it, for instance), so you're either using an omniscient narration or are in Twilight's perspective.
>she read to herself, jotting something down on her forms//
The "something" takes this out of the realm of omniscient narration, but I don't know whose impression it is, since it could represent any of them, but Twilight last held the perspective, so I have to assume it's still her.
>If Pinkie heard, she ignored it, and the nurse was too busy checking boxes to notice.//
This isn't omniscient, since such a narrator would know if Pinkie heard. So it's limited, but I don't know whose observation this is. The default would be to say that it's whoever clearly held a perspective last (Twilight again), but my point here is that the perspective is wandering around.
>She turned back to face Flash--and saw him with a strange expression on his face.//
This is Twilight's perspective. She's the one looking at him, so it's her judgment that it's a "strange" expression, plus the use of a dash makes the narration conversational and thus far more likely to be limited than omniscient.
>Pinkie looked up and beamed.
The use of italics again makes this conversational and limited. Cadance was the one looking at her, so I can only assume this is her opinion and emphasis the narrator is expressing, so she holds the perspective now. Up until now, you'd had Twilight's perspective, so I could assume this is still her, and it would be reasonable for her.

More to the point is that these are fairly weak opinions. The narrator isn't particularly passionate about any of them, and none of them are that blatantly tied to Twilight's viewpoint—to wit, let me pull another excerpt from early in the chapter:
>Twilight nodded. “I know,” she said, a note of sadness in her voice.//
Why would she be evaulating her own tone of voice instead of the emotion behind it? When you're sad, is it hearing your own voice that makes you realize it? This line casts into doubt that Twilight really holds the viewpoint.

So all that's to say that it's strange to go to a strong depiction of Pinkie's perspective from a weak depiction of what was probably Twilight's but was fairly indeterminate. It feels pretty close to going from an omniscient to a limited viewpoint, and that's not a very good thing to do. It's not that you're going to Pinkie; it's that you're coming from something fairly unidentifiable.

Now, back to how to do a smooth transition. Basically, you want to zoom the camera out of your first character and back into the new one. So start with a sentence that carries a conversational tone clearly in the first character's viewpoint. Maybe have the character ask a question or shout. Then back out a little, where the narrator is still clearly expressing the character's opinion, but doing so calmly. Then have the narrator say something totally factual that any character present could know. Now, it should sound omniscient. Then reverse the process to ease into the new character's viewpoint. It just takes a few sentences, but it guides the reader so he doesn't have to keep re-evaluating to whom he should attribute narrative subjectivity.

And you do that.

>Pinkie looked up and beamed.//

The emphasis makes this someone's opinion (I'm not sure whose), and it's delivered conversationally.
>One by one, they filed out. The nurse stayed behind a little, to ask if she needed anything else--water, blankets, whatever--then said she’d be back soon with bassinets for the little ones.//
The aside is a little conversational, and the judgment call of "a little" is still subjective, but weaker, so the camera's backing off. This is probably the nurse holding the perspective, but it's not quite clear.
>When the door clicked shut, Pinkie looked down at her little foals and sighed happily.//
This is a dispassionate, factual statement.
>It had been long and hard, but, finally, they were here--her three little treasures.//
The "long and hard" is a weak subjective statement in Pinkie's viewpoint, then the aside is more firmly her opinion and takes on a more conversational tone, so it's steadily becoming more subjective. By the next sentence, the narrator is easily speaking Pinkie's thoughts for her, so this was a smooth transition.

>I would love to keep her name as it is--given name "Waltz," nickname "Whiskey"--but, short of moving the scene with Rarity in the cafe up significantly, I don't know what else to do.

I'd said there's probably not a good answer to this. If you change the title, you lose the meta joke you're trying to make (which again, is far too convenient a coincidence, and that sort of amazing fortune tends to work well only in comedy, but I know you're not going to give that up). I suppose it would be possible to have someone mis-hear the name earlier, but of course Waltz wouldn't be old enough to latch onto that yet, so it would have to come up again later that someone else makes the same mistake or (more likely) someone tells Waltz about the time it happened. Even if this revelation is seen as taking place early in the three-story arc versus late in the first story, it's still a fairly significant word count for the reader to wade through, wondering whether you made a mistake. But sometimes, you just have to grit your teeth and take the hit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2129

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

My quick initial impression from the first few paragraphs:

>he supposes//

It's not really necessary to do this, since you're taking a very limited voice in the wolf's perspective. It's already understood that the narration reflects his thoughts and perceptions.

And I'm seeing a lot of "to be" verbs early on. It's best to limit them anyway, but especially at the beginning, where you want to grab the reader's interest. They're inherently boring verbs, because nothing happens. Even rephrasing something without motion, like "he stood there" instead of "he was there" creates a more active feel, which adds momentum to the story. I'll revisit this at the end.

Okay, on to more of the story.

>to be hasty and loose such an easy catch//

Lose/loose confusion.

>dangling (hanging?)//

I'm not sure what the parenthetical adds. It doesn't change the context any.

Zecora. Yes, she's tough to write for. I spent nearly 3 months writing dialogue for her on a story that was only 4k words. But that's partly because I put far more restrictions on her speech than I had to. Still, if you're going to use her, use her well. This requires two things.

Rhyme. You're fine, for the most part, but there are some real stretches here. "Escort" and "unhurt"? That's not going to cut it.

Rhythm. I say that as a generic term, because I'm not going to hold you to an actual meter (even though I tortured myself by keeping to one). In canon, she's pretty close to iambic tetrameter, but there's no reason you have to adopt that. Still, you at least do want to have mostly a steady number of syllables per line, even if you don't follow a regular stress pattern. She'll occasionally have a significantly longer couplet in canon, so deviating once in a while is fine, but try to be as consistent as possible.

>I should know you well enough by now to watch for your approach before I would allow.//

That's actually some nice iambic speech, roughly. I don't know if it was intentional. When I was talking about variation in rhythm, though, it's more from couplet to couplet. Within each couplet, you really should strive to have the pair of lines as similar as possible. So you have kind of five iambs in the first line with the unstressed syllable clipped off the beginning (or five trochees with the last unstressed syllable clipped off). Then the second line is six iambs.

>These paths are home to dangers you know not – on them you never travel giving no thought//

The first line of the couplet is perfect iambic pentameter. The second has an extra unstressed syllable wedged in, so it's four iambs and an anapest.

>and should you wish to keep from needing escort, you will learn how to keep yourself unhurt//

The first line has an added unstressed syllable on the end. This is actually acceptable on occasion—it's known as "female rhyme," and happens chiefly with iambic pentameter in sonnets. The second line is all jumbled, though. It's missing the initial unstressed syllable and has an extra one jammed in a little later. Plus the rhyme occurs on different stresses.

>We will begin that training soon; for now, I have already planned our brew.//

Is that supposed to rhyme? I'm guessing it's "now" with "brew"? While I applaud you for not feeling compelled to put the rhymes at natural pauses in the speech, it's still a very questionable rhyme, and while it's nicely iambic, the first part has five feet and the second has four.

>But stay a minute, see what watched your journey, and know the peril brought by leaving early.//

This one is actually a good example of iambic pentameter with female rhyme. The rhyme itself is a bit of a stretch, but not too bad, and the rhythm is right on. You just don't want to use female rhyme that often, so resist the urge to keep drawing from that well.

Alright, enough with the poetry analysis. Suffice it to say that it needs a little attention, but it's close. If you don't want a rigorous meter, that's fine, but you really should have it close to one within each couplet, and it helps if you don't have couplets with big changes in the number of syllables right next to each other.

It gets confusing how you distinguish Apple Bloom from Zecora for one main reason: when the "she" occurs at the beginning of the sentence, there's no way to differentiate capitalization. This tripped me up more than once. You might want to come up with a more unique way to identify Zecora so this doesn't happen.

>hunters/hungers//

Another pretty weak rhyme.

>Should you harm her in any way, with your life you will pay.//

Here's an example of a couplet that has no regular rhythm and is quite a bit shorter than most you use. But it really helps that it's set apart from the rest. It's not in a single quote with other lines of hers, so if you don't intend to stick to a constant meter, this is a good way to break things up. It is a little weak for the second line being obviously shorter than the first, though.

>The pup that lost his mother’s catch to a cockatrice, too busy bullying his sister out of the way to have it all to himself; the wolf who challenged a young manticore for its territory and lost, stinger stabbing and striking until the wolf could almost feel the venom trickling through his branches, corrupting the wood, and the potions She soaked him with when he had collapsed in the middle of the trail.//

You had the right idea with that first semicolon, but I'm not sure you know why. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence, but there are items in a list, and one of them has an internal comma, so you would separate the list items with semicolons.

>he carefully brings his paws under him, and unsteadily stands//

There's no need for a comma there, as he performs both actions, so they're all one clause.

>Big Mac and Applejack had made sure that was a boring summer.//

You definitely have the narrator taking Apple Bloom's perspective here. He's saying her thoughts for her, and the italicized emphasis here makes it take on a conversational bent as well, like it's mirroring her stream of thought. So far, so good. But look at how the language she's using sounds. Really, there are two things that are off about it. First, it's pretty advanced word choice for a filly, unless you mean this to take place after she's gotten older, which isn't at all evident. For that matter, it doesn't even sound like she'd speak, with her family's colorful expressions and rustic words (but please don't go overboard on writing her accent phonetically). The other thing is that it sounds pretty much identical to the wolf's perspective. Part of that is tied into how it doesn't sound like a child, but even if there's justification for her having an adult voice, you still want it distinct from the other characters. Look at the difference between the narration and her speech. With this kind of narrator, the narration is essentially her internal speech. Why would it sound so different from what she says out loud? You could have a more formal sounding limited narrator if you wanted, but you'd have to watch having him take that conversational style.

>the filly was quickly growing uncomfortable//

This is something most writers don't put much thought into. Consider that you're using a very limited narrator, i.e., the narrator is essentially Apple Bloom herself, different from first-person narration only in the use of "she" instead of "I." If you were writing this in first person, would you have her refer to herself as "the filly"? That'd be strange. She'd just say "I." Same in third person limited. When you use that, you imply that's how she describes herself. More reasonably, she'd just use "she" or "Apple Bloom" in third person. For that matter, it's a little odd for her to refer to Zecora as "the zebra," too. If you're with a group of friends, one of whom is female, do you mentally call her "the woman" in your train of thought?

>access/guessed//

Another bad rhyme.

>sparse/heart//

Man. C'mon.

>neatly-formed//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb.

>Reading over the instructions again, Apple Bloom’s first impression//

A classic dangling participle. "Reading over the instructions again" is presumably supposed to describe Apple Bloom, but she doesn't appear. Her first impression does. This explicitly says that her first impression read over the instructions again.

>I can guess an most of these//

Typo.

>but…” She trailed off//

It's not necessary to narrate trailing off when it's apparent from the punctuation. The same is true of getting cut off.

>around— on//

Ah, I see you're differentiating cutoffs from asides by using different dashes. Brave soul. But don't leave any space on either side of an em dash.

>to not//

This is more properly phrased in reverse order.

>suddenly//

You use this word a couple times fairly close together during this scene, and it's one best avoided, for the most part. If it's really sudden, it will catch the reader by surprise. It's almost like assuring the reader that a joke is funny. If you have to tell them, it probably isn't.

>I know it ain’t going to taste how you were thinkin’ but I do know my fruit!//

Here's the opposite comma issue. There are two separate subject/verb pairs, so you'll usually put a comma between the clauses (I know..., but I do know...).

>Though while this gift might be honest do not forget what else exists, as even if he grants you peace the forest holds still sharper teeth.//

Yow. Those rhymes are pretty far off. It took me a minute to figure out what the rhyming pairs were even supposed to be.

I didn't notice quite as much "to be" verb overload as I did early in the chapter, but I'll count them anyway to see. Of the unambiguous forms I can search on, I got 88. That's once about every 35 words, or once every 2-3 sentences. That's not awful, but it's borderline, and like I said, it was really only noticeable near the beginning, where it's more pronounced. If you tone it down in the first scene, that should be enough.

This was quite a good story. You have good character work and an interesting set of world-building ideas coming together. The editing is good as well. Really the only complaint I had is the one about perspective, where the narration in Apple Bloom's perspective doesn't sound much like her. You're using the elements of a very subjective narrator, but he's not taking her voice. You could either change that voicing or remove those conversational-sounding parts to keep it as a more formal limited narrator, closer to an omniscient narrator in voice, but still restricted to what Apple Bloom knows or perceives. Or you could go full omniscient, if you wanted, and keep the narration purely factual.

Basically, you're currently using a narrator who's Apple Bloom but doesn't sound like her, so you can decide which end of that to adjust.

And Zecora's speech could use a little tweaking.

It wouldn't take a full re-read, just a spot check to see what kind of match you're making between the type of narrator and the tone he takes, so mark it as "back from Mars." Good luck to you, and I hope to see this return.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2131

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>some new friends, some of which//

Minor point, but you'll normally want to refer to sentient beings a little differently, so "some of whom" instead of "some of which."

> But, I am getting ahead of myself.//

It's pretty rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>I might as well start on the day that everything changed; the day that Fluttershy became a traitor and tried to turn everyone away from true friendship.//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to replace it with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence. A dash would do fine, and since you're clarifying, a colon would be fine, too.

>I could hear an audible gasp//

Well, if she could hear it, then it's pretty much audible by definition, right? This is redundant. In fact, it's triply redundant. I'd recommend just saying they gasped, for two reasons. "I could hear" wedges an extra step between the character and the reader. If the narrator just says it happens, I hear it with her. If the narrator says she heard it, he's the one who notices and then relays the information to me. It's best to reserve these kinds of phrasings for emphasizing that it's something most ponies wouldn't notice, because it's loud there, or she was specifically listening for it, for instance. Second, for her to have identified it as a gasp, it would have to be audible anyway.

>asked Sugar Belle//

Missing your end punctuation.

>I couldn't figure out what to say; my mind was deadlocked.//

This limited a narrator is uniquely positioned to convey the character's emotional state not only through what she says but how she says it. Consider that the narration is her internal monologue. If she was stumped for what to think or say, there are two things that would likely happen. First, she wouldn't have the presence of mind to calmly evaluate her mental condition like this. Second, her thoughts wouldn't be so smooth and organized anyway. If she's shocked and confused, make the narration sound like she's shocked and confused. Have it ask relevant questions to reflect her thought processes. Have it fumble for words.

>I'm sorry everypony//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I could see that I was changing some minds in the crowd//

What's her evidence of this? Show it to me and let me make my own judgment, not just have to take the narrator's word for it. Doing so also creates a lot more mental imagery. You want the story to create a little movie in my head, so don't lose track of keeping that picture going. Let me see what happens.

>Cutie Marks//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this. It probably doesn't need to be.

>I shouted in a panic.//

Again, paint a picture. Don't just tell me she's panicked. Demonstrate it through the narrative tone and her actions. Just be careful they're descriptions she'd make of herself, since she's the narrator. For instance, she'd know she was trembling, but she can't see her own face, so she couldn't tell me that her pupils had shrunk.

>and allows me//

Typo.

>their shock evident//

How so?

>Double Diamond called out//

You just used that speaking verb two sentences ago. You don't want to repeat these more unusual ones too often. "Said" is still going to do mot of the heavy lifting, as it's designed to blend in and avoid taking attention away from the dialogue itself.

>It felt so good//

Again, let the narration carry the mood. What kinds of thoughts does this cause to go through her head? How does she act? When you;re this blunt, I know her emotional state as a fact, but I don't feel it along with her. And that's the trick: getting the reader to empathize.

>all of my magical was restored//

Typo.

>A lie wouldn't hurt them too much at this point, right?//

Which is really no different than her original situation. I guess it depends on whether you still want her to appear a villain. If she's still concealing the truth for some reason, then you're setting up the story to give her a comeuppance later, but if she has a legitimate reason for keeping her cutie mark that works to the benefit of her vision, then why not be up front about it? They've already accepted her explanation so far, so she has reason to think they'll continue to. It's worth rethinking this or explaining it better.

>A little lie never hurt anyone, right?//

Then she says almost the exact same thing just a paragraph later.

>Though they forgave me, they might very well have me remove my cutie mark.//

Would she be willing? She's already put forth the possibility of leaving and only coming back when they needed another cutie mark removed.

>There was only one other order of business; the elements.//

Misused semicolon again. This should be a colon or a dash.

>After a few more hours of talking and socializing with other ponies//

This kind of glosses over a lot. They've gotten a pretty big bombshell, so do they seem accepting of her? Are any seemingly supicious? Does it make her feel good that they still want her around despite her revelation?

>but it does not matter//

The descriptions of the elements are pretty vague here.

>her voicing raising//

Typo. And raising means it increased over what it had been, yet she hadn't spoken yet.

>They were all glaring at me now.//

You already had Pinkie doing that. It's possible to make repetition work, but you have to make it obvious that it's intentional. If you italicized "all," for example, it calls attention to the repetition so that it creates an effect.

>sadness filling my voice//

This is what I was talking about earlier. Don't force her into making a very external judgment of her mood. When you're sad, how do you know? Certainly not because hearing your own voice makes you realize it. The emotion itself is more immediate. So be sure to have her perceptions of her own emotions be something internal.

>Their faces were shocked//

Show me.

>hello Double Diamond//

Needs a comma for direct address.

Now that I've given you multiple examples of the things that turned up in this chapter, I'm not going to keep marking the same ones. I'll bring up new issues from here on, but I'll trust that you can apply these examples to further chapters.

And before I go on, I want to remark on the format. The beginning says it's being recorded as a journal, and the heading after the first paragraph has a numbered day, which matches that choice. But the way the rest of the chapter is written, it doesn't resemble a journal at all. So it's unclear to me whether only that first paragraph is the actual journal entry, before the next scene picks up with the live events. That's the way it feels, anyway, and if it's what you intended, then it needs to be clearer how you're formatting it. Or if you did intend the entire chapter to feel like a journal, it's not working. Here's why.

Think about how people write journals. Unless she's there recording the events within a few seconds of them happening (and since you're recounting canon events where she clearly didn't, that's doubtful), nobody is going to remember that much detail. At the end of the day, would you remember small things about how people acted and what the scenery looked like? A few things that stuck in your mind, sure, and then you'd also know why they stuck in your mind and mention that. You'd also remember the gist of a conversation, but not word-for-word, quoted dialogue. Here's an example I often use. Which one of these sounds more reasonable for something a young girl would write in her diary at the end of the day?

--------

Today we had pizza for lunch in the cafeteria. Kimmy kept making faces at Jeff behind his back, and it almost made me laugh milk out my nose. I finally remembered to ask her if she'd watch my cat while I was on my trip to California, and she said she would.

---or---

"Stop that," I mouthed to Kimmy. If she kept that up, I'd cough up my pizza and milk. Besides, I don't like her making fun of Jeff.

"Hey, can you watch my cat while I'm away?" I asked her to distract her as much as anything else, but I really did need her to. Glad I finally remembered to ask her.

"Sure," she replied, her amber earrings jostling around as she turned her head toward me. "He's a little cutie anyway. You mind if I keep him at my house?"

--------

So if you want this to sound like a journal, you need to think about how people actually write them.

>Spike said, still worried.//

What's his evidence that Spike is still worried? Without that, you're essentially having him read Spike's mind.

>These was//

Typo.

>ponies minds//

You're using a plural where you need a possessive.

>That day, when taking them out to ask if they would like to join the village, something wonderful happened.//

Through this sentence, the scene does reasonably sound like a journal entry, but after this, you've got full conversations again, which don't match a journal format.

>I I//

Missing some kind of punctuation there.

>transition to our little community//

>transition into our community//
>before moving to our little community//
These are in three consecutive sentences. Try to avoid repeating words or phrases in a close space like this.

>I allowed her cottage to have a sewing room.//

Why in the world would she do this? It's completely contrary to how she ran the village before. It's actually a little curious that she allowed Sugar Belle to be a baker at all, though she did force her to make things she wasn't good at. So while it's not too outlandish that she'd allow Rarity to sew, it is unusual that she'd leave Rarity open to sew what she wanted. She's acknowledging that Rarity's better at something than the others are, which is against her philosophy of equality, so why let her? More in line with how she acted in the show would be for Starlight to dictate what Rarity must make and have it be something she's not really talented at.

>and seemed to be struggling to come up with new designs//

Which is exactly what she'd said before, that she had no inspiration. So I'm not sure what's changed.

>who I created harmony for//

whom

>While I used to be a strange site//

Homophone confusion.

>Rarity with a perfectly stylized mane//

Why doesn't she have the same mane as everyone else? They made a point of that in the episode.

>20//

Write out numbers that short.

>ya'//

Why the apostrophe? You're not eliding anything, just making an imitative spelling.

>informant in Canterlot//

So... do the other villagers know about her? Does she still have her cutie mark? Presumably so, or that would really stand out in Canterlot. How do the villagers feel about that?

>I tossed her a bag of bits that I always kept on me./

Rather convenient, given that she's normally not shown wearing saddlebags.

>Let's not make anymore mistakes//

An adverb doesn't parse there. "Anymore" isn't the same thing as "any more."

>I thought I saw a small streak of gold and white going south east, but I hope it was nothing//

She wouldn't try to investigate this? She knows a bunch of soldiers are on the way, after all. Wouldn't it make sense that they might send out advance scouts?

It's starting to get a tad formulaic that one of the Mane Six converts each chapter. I go into it expecting that, and sure enough, it happens. It's not really the kind of aspect about a story that you want to be predictable, because it's about something that shouldn't be. Starlight wouldn't have expected one per day, so it's overly convenient that it happens that way.

>That, and I also really need the bits//

Why do they even need money in a town where everyone's equal? Isn't that a good way to make sure ponies aren't equal? Or do they all pool their money and divide it up at the end of each day?

In the "Preparations" chapter, all of these little conversations she has with each of them are very stiff and perfunctory. They're very functional and accomplish exactly what they need to and nothing more. In other words, they don't sound very lifelike.

>May Celestia forgive me for what I will be doing.//

Why would she care to have any reverence for Celestia? At least the princess would probably share her ideal that all ponies should be equal, but Celestia's right in the mainstream regarding cutie marks.

>cannott//

Typo.

>You would have spoken to Celestia or some other ponies and warn about the town.//

Something there is off in the wording.

>"Its not much of a choice, is it? I... I'll do what you say."//

See, this would be a big emotional moment for Twilight. But it's lost, because I have no idea how she reacts to this. You're so dialogue-heavy here (which, again, doesn't fit the journal format) that it loses the ability to create a visual scene in my head.

>"We have a new friend," I told them, gesturing my hoof at Twilight Sparkle.//

And she's not going to use Twilight's "conversion" as leverage to convince Rainbow Dash?

>Things sure our becoming lively in this town//

Typo.

>my.... friends//

One too many dots there.

>every one of your friends are happy//

Except Dash, right? And "every one" is singular, so "is."

>"WHAT was THATPeachy Seashell?! WHATwere YOU thinking?!" I shouted.//

Note how her emotion is entirely in the dialogue. The narration sounds entirely bland about it, so there's a disconnect in her emotional state.

>Y-Yes//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

>"Twilight, why did you tell Fluttershy about the necklace?" I asked.//

How did she know Twilight told her? And hadn't she told Twilight there would be consequences if she did?

>neither of you mind//

Since each thing "neither" refers to (Twilight and Fluttershy) is singular, it is as well, so "minds."

>The council is wanting to destroy the reeducation houses and allow anypony that wants to leave the opportunity to.//

Starlight sure sounds utterly unconcerned about this. She doesn't even deal with it or think about it, just goes calmly back to her house.

>"Thank ya' for//

>breakfast."//
Odd line break here. And Starlight just invited her in. The each spoke a few lines. When did they eat? There are a lot of places like this where the story blasts forward at breakneck speed. You actually have a number of strange line breaks in this chapter.

>"Of course... will that be all?"//

>"No, that will be all.//
That's a strange answer to that question.

Forest Embers just changes her mind so quickly that it totally disarms any sort of conflict the story was building up with her. Conflict is interesting when it takes a struggle to resolve, not when it just goes away.

>The bakers had prepared a variety of food, from bread to some light soup.//

If they're bakers, why are they making soup?

>ShesplanningontellingShiningArmoraboutRainbowDashandtheequalizationprocess//

Don't do this. It screws up the formatting, and it's difficult to read. Just describe how she says it.

>After reading through it, I got into one of my moods. Unfortunately, I'll have to replace the guest chair soon.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean, if it's meant to be funny, if it's supposed to be a big emotional moment for her...

>admittances//

admissions

I don't get why Starlight has strikethroughs in chapter 16. Those are things she decided not to say? Why not? It's not like anyone else will see them, and if someone did, that wouldn't effectively hide them anyway. If she really wanted to get rid of them, she could just erase them. What purpose is this serving?

>I noted that the room looked like a normal doctor's office, minus any degrees or proof of being a doctor. //

Why is she noting this? Wouldn't she already know?

Ah, interesting take on how they handle children getting their cutie marks. That was well thought out.

In the epilogue, Rainbow Dash is speaking quite formally. It doesn't sound quite like what I'd expect, given how she talks in the show.

Looks like you might have inadvertently left some notes to yourself at the end of the story.

Okay, I'm finally at the end, after spending about 2 weeks reading. I'll talk a bit about the ending first. You get some leeway for it being an epilogue, since they can often go in a different direction, but this chapter still feels so disconnected from the rest. It hadn't even dealt with Dash until now, and suddenly she becomes the focus, with a message that's tangential at best with what had happened before. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a bad choice. I will say that it's disorienting, and that's not the kind of reaction you want. Whether you believe a majority of readers will feel that way is up to you.

And Starlight's death. That sure sounds like a harsh sentence for what she did. She never killed anyone, many of her "victims" actually want to be that way, and the rest can be fully restored. And then she goes so quietly, without fanfare. I'm glad that you had Twilight conflicted over her death, but you stopped short of going anywhere with it. Is Twilight sure Starlight deserved it? You hint at something, but i's left hanging.

For the most part, the story's overall issues should be apparent from whatever I had to point out multiple times., but I'll rehash the main points.

General editing. I only paid attention to this over the first few chapters, but the kinds of things I noted there are present throughout the story.

Journal format. To be blunt, this doesn't sound like a journal at all. The epilogue isn't one, but look how it's identical in style to the other chapters. It just doesn't follow the style people actually use to write journals. It's up to you whether you want to try making it fit the format or just lose the journal headers and leave it as a standard narrative, since that's how most of it comes across anyway.

Natural-sounding dialogue. Every conversation is so short and to the point, with every character saying precisely what's needed to advance the plot and nothing more. It's like a witness trained to give testimony, where he's told to answer questions briefly and factually but not to volunteer any information beyond that. Real conversations don't happen that way. People go off on tangents, try to convince each other, etc. You have characters very quickly make their point and other characters just as quickly change their minds without any sort of deliberation or conflict. It also skews the sense of time. There will be 3 or 4 lines of dialogue, then the narration tells me that half an hour has somehow elapsed.

Emotions are often presented bluntly. The common offenders are mentioning emotions as an adjective (he was sad), adverb (he walked happily), or prepositional phrase (he sighed in relief). It's better to imply emotion through how the characters act and look. There's a longer description at the top of this thread under the "show versus tell" heading.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2138

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Shining grumbled unintelligible words//

He holds the perspective. The words wouldn't be unintelligible to him. He knows what he said.

>“Yeah…” He answered//

Capitalization of the speech tag.

>His heart started to hurt, and he felt his eyes start to water.//

Watch close word repetition like this anyway, unless you make it clear it's being done deliberately for effect. But this is a verb you should use sparingly anyway. It's a given that any action starts or begins. It's only worth pointing out when that beginning is noteworthy for some reason, usually because it's abrupt or the action never finishes.

>In these moments//

Fairly repetitive with the "in private moments like this" from just a few sentences back.

>-when//

Please use a proper dash. But it's not really appropriate anyway, since it's picking up from an earlier ellipsis, not another dash.

>How many times have they tempted both physical and emotional boundaries?//

This is kind of sudden. He's already remarked twice about how she behaves in private, so any hints of a latent attraction are curiously absent.

>Captai-oh//

Again, please use proper dashes. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>But it just didn’t reach his outer visage.//

How does he know that? He can't see his own face. Be careful to think about what the narrator can reasonably perceive from Shining's perspective.

>Luna went back to the couch and laid back down.//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to keep straight.

>rumors spread Luna//

Needs a comma for direct address. Unless you actually meant that to sound lewd...

>As he was beginning to pace, he felt his old injury start acting up.//

More of those start/begin actions.

>had...yeah//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts the sentence.

>when he started to get worked up//

Another "start," in the same paragraph, no less. Just keep a an eye out for these.

>It wasn’t his job to keep track of them, it was the Night Captain’s.//

>Maybe he could remember where the Night Captain would be at this time of night, he could ask her who that guard was.//
Comma splices.

>“Three in the morning.” He was answered by Luna.//

Punctuation/capitalization of the transition from speech to attribution. And what's the advantage of passive voice here? It's not shifting the focus anywhere useful, so it just takes the action away from the sentence.

>He didn’t like staying in the castle apartment anymore, it only roused bad memories.//

Another comma splice. Keep an eye out for these as well.

>back so her back was against the back//

Yow. And you had another "back" earlier in the same paragraph.

>He wasn’t going to lay with Luna.//

Lay/lie confusion again. And I hope we'll get an explanation of this at some point. Just assuring the reader that Luna's trying to put the moves on Shining without giving her any justification as to why isn't going to bring it alive or get the reader invested in it.

>in almost a blinding way//

Kind of a jumbled word order there.

>Luna was laying in front of him, her wing draped over him and her lips locked with him.//

Why is she trying to seduce someone she knows is still grieving over his dead wife? You're not making a very sympathetic character out of her, unless you're willing to put work in the back story explaining how this developed in a natural way.

>his parents house//

Missing apostrophe.

>he liked his Whiskey straight//

You intermittently capitalize that for some reason.

>As the stallion attempted to push himself up//

Shining holds the perspective, so why is he referring to himself as the stallion? That's like you calling yourself "the person" in your own thoughts.

>The voice was in his ear now.//

Needs an extra line break.

Why do you shift from past to present tense in that last scene?

There are a number of editing problems, mostly multiple instances of the same things. I haven't marked them all, but watch out for those grammatical errors and repetition that I've pointed out.

Maybe you end up addressing this in a later chapter, but this unexplained attraction involving Shining Armor and Luna is pretty off-putting. It's just there with no preamble and no justification.

Really, the biggest thing is that the narration is so blunt about how the characters feel. You'll want to avoid naming emotions directly and instead imply them through how the characters look and act. There's a short discussion of it at the top of this thread under "show versus tell."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2150

>The diary of Glory of House Galaxy//
This is immediately confusing. I finally figured out Glory is a character who's a part of the Galaxy family, but it took a few tries. This could easily mean the character's full name is Glory of House Galaxy. My first thought was that you were adding a title to the book, that it was the diary of glory, to make it sound impressive. With many names, this wouldn't be an issue. "The Diary of Jeff of House Cooper" is pretty easy to unravel, but when most pony names are words unto themselves, it throws a wrench into the works. You might want to rephrase that to minimize the potential of it being taken the wrong way.

>My own Uncle//

That's not a situation where you'd normally capitalize that. Is there a particular reason why you did? EDIT: Now that I've read much further, I see a lot of weird capitalizations, like "Pony." I guess it's fine as a quirk, but it is pretty weird.

>Given it over to those two creatures.//

This falls under the category of things people do by reflex because they've never really thought about it. What are the italics supposed to signify here? That he actually can write in italics? That he'd been printing the other words but wrote this one in cursive? How would you emphasize a word in handwriting? Italics typically signify emphasis in speech, that the speaker put stress on that word, but in writing, you're far more likely to darken it (i.e., bold font), underline it, or put it in all capital letters.

>Not only did he cast me aside and take that half-blood commoner as his apprentice … not only did she use what he’d taught her to get close to Princess Platinum and become a heroine of our new homeland in my stead … but now, my very birthright is lost forever!//

This is pretty much the same thing. Trailing off is very much a speech affectation. it happens because the person has lost the train of what he was saying, gets distracted, hasn't thought out what he wants to say completely, etc. Or it can mean the speaker is coming into or going out of hearing range, the listener is losing or gaining consciousness, etc. None of that happens in writing. He's sitting there at a desk with as much time as he needs. If he has an incomplete though, he can simply sit there and work it out in his head before writing it. He has that luxury of perfecting it before committing it to paper, even erasing it if he doesn't like what he came up with. The fact that he deliberately inscribed three dots into the paper is a very different thing from including it in speech by being caught unprepared. He must mean something by it to go to that trouble, but it doesn't really carry any additional meaning. It can make a conversation (or limited narration, which is pretty much dialogue anyway) more realistic, but it tends to do the opposite to articles of writing.

Short version: really think about whether the ellipses are worth putting in here, because they aren't very plausible for the medium.

>Alicorns — and//

You do put spaces around an en dash, but not an em dash.

>Clover the Clever’s laboratory notes//

I have two thoughts about this section, and they may sound like nitpicks. They're not the kind of thing I'd reject a story over, but I think they do detract from it. The first is that this doesn't sound like lab notes at all. It's not going over their research, what worked, what didn't, and what they learned from it. It's going over a lot of non-scientific impressions. It sounds a whole lot more like a diary entry than lab notes. And that leads me to the other thing: it sounds a lot like a diary entry... the one the chapter opened with, to be precise. It uses pretty much the same vocabulary and types of very formal phrasings, so it doesn't do a lot to distinguish one character's voice from the other. This could have easily been written by Glory.

>I had nothing but one cake for breakfast after raising the Sun, and it was only one layer thick.//

I understand the temptation to do something like this, but a lighthearted meme reference is a poor fit for the tone you're setting with this story. You're trying to build up a lot of tension in the chapter, and this undercuts it. You're painting a gritty picture of an unsteady alliance, back-alley deals, political intrigue, and sinister machinations... and we get a "Celestia likes cake" joke in the middle of it. Moments of levity are fine in a dark, serious story, but you have to be careful what type of humor you use. Gallows humor? Very appropriate. Slapstick? Not so much. And this runs uncomfortably close to that end of the spectrum.

>I’d have more time to—//

This is just like the ellipses. Who's going to get cut off while writing a letter like that? If the fire alarm went off in your building while you were writing a letter, would you write a dash there? Or would you simply stop writing and pick up right where you left off when you got back? In speech, she'd stop talking like this as soon as the contrary thought entered her mind, but at the speed people write and how far they think ahead of what word they're currently penning, it would have occurred to her far before she got to this point, anyway. It's just inauthentic to the format. It's trying to apply speaking conventions to writing, and it just doesn't happen that way.

>off….!//

One too many dots there (that's typically used only in nonfiction when quoting reference material, and the exclamation mark would take the place of the fourth dot anyway), plus I've already made my case against the use of ellipses in a diary.

I'm noting that you introduce letters with a greeting, but they never have a closing.

>great things have been accomplished and the House has grown in power and influence.//

You've broken this rule several times, but until now they all seemed justified in doing so. Now I wish I'd copied one of them out so I could show you why they work and this one doesn't, but now I'm not going to be able to find it again. You have two separate clauses here, so you'll usually want to put a comma between them. One where you didn't but I agreed with your choice I vaguely remember as being this type: where both clauses are a conditional for a third thing. For instance, I wouldn't use one with the "and" in a structure like so: "If I do this and he does that, then this other thing will happen." But more often, you do the opposite, using an unnecessary comma with a conjunction that's only separating a compound verb.

>I didn’t even arrange that ball, it was a surprise party and the minister of agriculture planned it.//

Comma splice.

>haring off//

Is that a British expression? I've never heard of it before. And since the princesses don't speak British, it might be an odd thing for them to use. I've looked it up, and it is a valid definition in American dictionaries as well, though many sources cited it as a chiefly British usage.

>Fulfilling my responsibilities.//

I really hope we get a better progression of this attitude later in the story, as it's not really supported by canon. I get that Celestia's quite young herself here, and maybe she's still got a touch of immaturity, but by the time of their duel in canon, she wasn't remotely this accusatory, but much more regretful of what she had to do. Plus when Luna returned, even considering that Celestia had a millennium to mellow out, Luna didn't act surprised that Celestia was welcoming and warm to her. Having her act out of character is fine, as long as you connect the dots to show me how to get there from canon. So I'll be keeping an eye out for this. EDIT: I see that Celestia does warm up to her and become more genuinely concerned for Luna instead of remaining standoffish. So that seems to be okay.

I'm a little curious as to why you have Luna using pretty modern speech, as opposed to the archaic words she uses in canon. I suppose you could say it's because she's not very old yet, and only the adults speak that way, but that's not how it happened in our own history. It's fine if you just didn't feel like tackling that (for Luna alone, much less the entire society), but I just found it a curiosity.

Time for another chapter of "what doesn't belong in letters." Strikethroughs. He's decided he doesn't want to say something anymore. Rather than erasing it or getting out a fresh sheet of paper and starting over, he's leaving it in there, so he must not mind that the recipient will see it. So why not finish it as he wrote it? You're simultaneously saying that he doesn't want his correspondent to see it and that he doesn't mind if they do. If he truly wanted to obscure it, he'd scribble it out so thoroughly that it couldn't be read (or again, erase it or start over). You could paste in a picture of a scribble mark here, I suppose, since there isn't a character of one. Or is there? Sure there are times that it would make sense, like the writer was so rushed that he didn't have time to start over, but that would come through in how hastily the letter was phrased. There are other ways to show that something like this has happened. The reader noting a scribble mark or erasure scuff, for example, but that requires narration. You're going letter-only, so you don't have that luxury. It's the choice you made, so you need to live within those boundaries. If it's truly something he wanted removed, then it can't be in the letter. Period. You can't just do an end run around the format to give the reader access to information that the intended recipient wouldn't have.

Here's another odd thing for me. There are a few common ways to present stories like this. Maybe only two characters are involved and we see the letters they exchanged. We're seeing what the two characters themselves saw. Or if it's all research material Twilight pulled up to study, then there's a reason it's all collated in the story. Basically that it's all stuff that one or a small number of focus characters have seen. But you have a number of disparate groups that would only have access to certain parts of the story's documents, essentially making me jump through a lot of perspectives. Now that you've also gone to Celestia's private journal, you've also pretty much made it impossible that any one character could have assembled all of this. The rest were public or semi-private, but there's no reason to think anyone would have access to Celestia's journal, unless you give me a way at some point. Enough stories do this that it's anoher thing I'm not going to count against you. Establishing some commonality almost requires setting up a frame story, and you may well not want to do that. But it's just another way that careful choice of how the story is presented can make it have a much more coherent feel.

>I’ll never forget seeing the light just… just flicker out of Clover’s eyes when he snapped his claws//

Now I'm wondering if you shouldn't have an AU tag. Discord isn't violent, and Celestia only ever refers to him forcing ponies to play his games, which is torture in a way, but not physical. His comment about being someone who would never turn ponies to stone is pretty illustrative, too. But again, this is a common enough conceit in stories that it's something I can live with. I'm racking up a lot of these.

Man, another pet peeve. There are a few canon characters who speak in a British accent, but most don't. British spellings and expressions are a mixed bag in narration depending on how limited the narrator it is, i.e., how much it reflects the actual thoughts of the focus character. But British spellings in a character's speech or writing, when they're known not to speak with a British accent, tend to create a disconnect. That said, the only characters you have here that we've heard speak in the show are Celestia and Luna, so you could make the case that Star Swirl and Clover are British. And of course any of the OCs can be.

>and who saw me nursed me back to health//

Something got messed up in that wording.

>What better way to begin a secret diary than a juicy confession?//

See, this just creates a big disconnect for me. This isn't supposed to be too far before Nightmare Moon happens, yet when Luna returns, picking up right where she left off, she speaks in an archaic and very formal manner, not realizing that it's not common anymore. Yet you have her speaking in a very informal and modern tone here.

So there were a lot of things I brought up that I said I wouldn't make you change, and I'll honor that. Just food for thought. The editing's quite good on this. The only real issues I had so far are why Luna sounds as juvenile and modern as she does, and how there are a lot of detailed things that just don't quite work with the letter/journal format. If you can clear those up (plus the purely mechanical stuff I noted), I'd be happy to post this. I wouldn't need to do more than spot-check it, so mark it as "back from Mars."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2184

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

There are some scattered editing problems. Nothing too serious, but it could use a good proofreading pass. You tend to waver between past and present tense, and I don't mean how you use present during the hospice scenes and past during the reminiscences. Even within those, it can be inconsistent.

You get quite blunt with the emotional context at times. It's better to imply emotion through the character's appearance and behavior instead of just having the narrator inform the reader of how the character feels. Think about how an actor gets you to interpret his character's emotion. That's closer to how people do so in real life, so it's much more natural and engaging. To use a simple example, it's like the difference between "he was happy" and "he smiled." The latter demonstrates it and creates a visual, while the former is a cold fact that doesn't paint a picture. Look out for emotion/mood words used as nouns (his sadness), adjectives (he was angry), adverbs (he skipped happily), or in prepositional phrases (sighed in relief).

Right away in chapter one, we have Fluttershy reminiscing about the first time she met Rarity. You start out as giving a narrative summary of it, which isn't going to be the best way to bring it alive. If you want to deliver several quick-hit anecdotes, it's fine, but having a single long one will resonate more if you treat it like a flashback and show the events as they happened. And then you do eventually slide into doing it that way, but it just feels inconsistent, since you hadn't started it that way. But in both parts, note how the narration is a bit on the bland side. She's remembering things that have a strong emotional attachment for her, but she doesn't sound like they stir much up in her. Imagine if she was saying the narration out loud. First-person narration is basically dialogue. So invest it with the same things: emphasis, inflection, trailing off, shouting, asking questions. That'll really get her mood across.

Watch when you get into conversations that you don't let narration fall by the wayside or get locked into the same structures. The first long conversation you have in the story starts to get in a rut where a bunch of paragraphs in a row have the same pattern of sentences: short quotation, short narrative action. Go for a little more variety.

Rarity sure is using "dear" and "darling" a whole lot more than she does in the show. It's only an occasional thing. But even beyond those particular terms, How often do you really use direct address of any type when you're talking one on one? Not very much.

That's a rather anticlimactic line to end chapter 1. It gets back to that concept of demonstrating emotions instead of informing me of them. By giving me the conclusion instead of leaving a trail of clues to it, you're not making me think about it, so I'm distanced from it as the chapter ends. You want the opposite effect.

>“Howdy, y’all.”//

>//
>I am sure it is Applejack just by the way her steps sound.//
Given that piece of dialogue, the gait is really what's giving her a vital clue?

>Thanks Applejack//

This is just one example, but you're missing a bunch of commas for direct address.

>The weather in the Vanhoover region has a reputation for turning suddenly without warning//

This flashback sure ends quickly, and it doesn't make a point. It's loosely connected, but it's an unnecessary step. Fluttershy's using the fritters to call up this memory, which then leads into Applejack's argument with Rarity, except Fluttershy had already mentioned that before now, so it wasn't a necessary step to explain the camping trip.

>to not//

Most times, you'll want these in the other order.

It's striking me now that we're getting plenty of Fluttershy acting all flustered around Rarity and inwardly professing her love, but at some point, you'll need to justify why she loves Rarity. You've explained th physical attraction, but there needs to be something more. The relationship doesn't really come alive unless we see the evidence ourselves. So what does Fluttershy like about her beyond her looks? What are some little anecdotes of times Fluttershy found her endearing? So far, it's just been Fluttershy admiring her beauty or making goo-goo eyes at her, but precious little about how Rarity appeals to her as a person.

And then you do have a scene break for the time skip in this reminiscence. You're pretty inconsistent at organizing these flashbacks by scene.

>challenged Applejack into a drinking contest//

That would just be "to."

>Listen, sis//

As terms of address, family relations get capitalized.

>‘round//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want an opening single quote. You can type two in a row, then delete the first, or you can paste one in the right way.

>Applejack!...//

An ellipsis would go before end punctuation, but it's pretty mutually exclusive with an exclamation mark. How does one trail off emphatically?

>“Are you alright?” He asked me.//

Capitalization. I'm seeing this a lot more in the last couple of weeks, likely because GDocs added some new "auto capitalization" feature. You might want to disable it.

>... Yes//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>keeping myself busy can only help so much with trying to keep//

Watch close word repetition like this. It's not the only instance I saw.

>I had to finish veterinary school, and go to Fillydelphia for a few years for my residency.//

You have quite a few unnecessary commas like this. You'd put one between clauses, but this one is just separating a compound verb. There's a brief discussion at the top of this thread under "comma use with conjunctions."

That's an awfully long block of exposition to end chapter 2. And it's just present-day Fluttershy doing it, but it's far more for the reader's benefit than hers.

Let me explain it this way. It takes her a while to think through all this, so what are the others doing? Just standing around in her hospice room? Nothing happened to prompt all this. And it's nothing new to her, so why explain it all? She sure sounds like she's talking to an audience, but one has never been identified. It's like she's talking to the reader, but then you'd need to define who the reader is and why she wants to tell him all this. So it comes across really odd both from the delivery and how it's fitting in with this narrative of everyone visiting her.

>Hi. How may I be of—//

You don't have to, but you're allowed to put a question mark or exclamation mark after a dash. You can put a question mark after an ellipsis, too.

>Rarity had put her luggage down in the corner, joining me at the windowside tea table.//

I hadn't really caught you doing this before, but beware overusing participial phrases. Over this and the next paragraph, yout tack them onto the ends of several sentences close together.

>I saw Rarity crying quietly by herself, looking at a framed picture of her and Golden Fleece//

I'm surprised she hadn't wondered about that before now. It's a pretty obvious thing to be on her mind. She just comes back without him, and it doesn't even register with Fluttershy?

>If she’s back, we should celebrate!//

She's been back for a while, so how had they managed to keep it that much of a secret? Rarity never went by Carousel Boutique? Nobody who came to visit Fluttershy ever saw her? Nobody who brought their animals for medical care caught a glimpse?

>old feelings had a way of burning into your mind and not going away//

This would do better in present tense, since it's something that continues to be true.

>has ran//

has run

>hold’em//

Missing a space.

>doctor’s//

No reason for that to be a possessive.

>“Well, um… is that… is that why you separated with Golden Fleece?”//

It's pretty strange how you keep floating in and out of present-day Fluttershy providing very expository narration and past Fluttershy interacting live with her friends, but this particular one was so short. Plus I'll say again, that it's strange for all this reminiscence to be happening while everyone's supposedly standing around Fluttershy in her hospice room. If she were alone, she'd have time to think about all this, but with visitors, what are they doing? Once in a great while, they check in and ask her what she was thinking about, but thousands upon thousands of words of flashbacks apparently take no more than a few seconds to sift through.

>Walking over to it, I opened it to the first page inside.//

Participles mean that things happen at the same time, but she probably wouldn't open the folder until after she'd walked over there.

>80//

Write out numbers this short.

>I found it more than a little kitsch//

Seems like you'd want the adjective, "kitschy."

>I was afraid that she would end up hurting herself with the sewing machine//

Given Fluttershy's "freaky knowledge of sewing," why has it taken her this long to pitch in with it?

>the sky was overcast outside//

As opposed to inside?

>Or, would I make mistakes all the same//

No reason to have that comma. It's rare for one after a conjunction to be used correctly.

>and deposited a copy with the local notary//

Huh? Notaries just certify that they witnessed the person signing the document and verified their identity. They don't keep copies of the documents, just a log of what they were.

>“Looking forward to that, sister.” Sweetie replied.//

Family relations get capitalized as terms of address. And the punctuation is off.

>mussel-headed//

Not really an insult I'm familiar with. Did you maybe mean "muscle-headed"?

>offering a box of tissues//

It's ambiguous whether Open Casket or Fluttershy does this.

>Rarity’s staff at Canterlot Carousel donated the money to pay for it.//

Why are all these characters donating such things? It's not like Rarity was poor. Her estate can well pay for it, and a lot of these aren't the kinds of things people contribute.

>newly-sprouted//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases that start with an -ly adverb.

>As for the rest of Rarity’s family, two aunts none of us except Sweetie Belle had ever met were the only attendees.//

Why were Rarity's parents not there? Maybe I'm forgetting something from earlier in the story, but I don't think I've seen where they died or were estranged from Rarity.

>Behind them, Cheerilee had collapsed into Big Mac’s chest, shuddering with every sob.//

You hadn't portrayed Cheerilee as being any more than an acquaintance to Rarity, so it seems odd to have her in full-bore sobs. I have no basis to know why she'd react this way.

>Some days…//

Really think about what's different between speaking this and writing it. When you speak, you may trail off because you lose your train of thought, hadn't finished formulating how you wanted to say it, maybe decided you didn't want to continue. Now think about why you'd do that in a letter. You wouldn't lose your train of thought or speak before you'd decided what to say. That's because you have as much time as you need to write. If you lost what you were going to say, you can simply think about it until you get it back. And if you decide you didn't want to say something, you can erase it or get a new sheet of paper and start over. An ellipsis in speech is more a result of something beyond your control. In writing, it's something you'd have to deliberately put on the paper, and to go to that trouble, there must be some meaning you intend to convey from it, and I don't think the sentence's meaning would change any without it. They also tend to work better in more informal things, like a young person's diary entry that's full of slang and sentence fragments. If you really want it there, I won't tell you you're wrong, but it doesn't really fit the tone.

>who he’d met//

whom. But as it's Rarity writing this, it's up to you whether she'd know that.

>I implore you, darling//

It's a little unusual for speaking affectations to make their way into someone's writing, so I'm not so sure she'd be prone to writing this. But like I said earlier about her frequency in using it, it is a little bit of overkill to have it again just two sentences later.

>and have a chance to make things right//

But if they do have a chance to reconnect, wouldn't that mean she also had a chance to reconnect with Golden Fleece? And as devoted as she stayed to him, wouldn't she still want to stick by him in that case? It just really feels like she's making an empty promise here. Fleece is just getting completely dropped, and given that Fluttershy is now near death herself, I'm betting you're going to follow through on getting them together. It really would make things go smoother if we got an explanation of why she feels like her business with Fleece is concluded now, even in an eternal sense.

>After re-reading the letter for the first time in a long time, I replace it in the same envelope Rarity had put it in all those years ago.//

So she's reading it right there in the room with everyone? I've noted several times that you're dropping that setting for huge stretches that make it seem odd, but you never had her pull this letter out. When did she do so? Did the others know what it was? You have them seem kind of oblivious here.

>“Oh, Rarity.” I whisper to no one in particular. “How could I have loved anyone but you?”//

Wait, when is this? Aren't the other girls still in the room? Nobody hears this?

>color and style of her mane is//

Number agreement: color and style... is.

>I let out the breath I didn’t realize I was holding.//

This is an incredibly cliched statement.

>If any of the common myths about death is true//

Number agreement again: any [myths}... is

Well, ou didn't end that like I thought you would, and I must say I'm pleasantly surprised. Fluttershy's still alive, there's no tearful reunion with Rarity, Discord made an appearance (really, I was afraid you'd forgotten about him, and you even gave an explanation of why he wasn't there the entire time Rarity lived with Fluttershy), and you left the ending open. Many authors don't know how to do open endings well—maybe you do know and maybe you lucked into it, but this is the right kind, where there are clear emotional stakes laid out for the various likely outcomes.

All in all, this was a nice story. It just needs some work on how it's delivered.

It needs a proofreading pass.

I've warmed up to how you eased in between the present and Fluttershy's memories, but I still think it could use some more explicit transitions, because you do jump fairly abruptly between having narrative summaries of those events and doing a more flashback style of portraying it as if it's happening live. You do intersperse a few present-day narrative comments, but it's also not really reasonable that she'd remember word-for-word dialogue of entire conversations and details about what things looked like after that many years. It's fine to do an "I remember the time when..." transition with a scene break, then a live flashback. I think it would come across as cleaner. What you have can work, but it's tricky to pull off well, and it's fairly jerky as is.

Focus more on demonstrating emotions than naming them. It makes the reader much more of a witness to the action instead of a recipient of factual information, and it's closer to a real-life experience.

Don't forget the narration when you get into conversations.

This is probably the biggest. You assure me through the entire story that Fluttershy was in love with Rarity, but I never really get to see it in action. At first, it's described in terms of a purely physical attraction, and then we go to Fluttershy making goo-goo eyes and getting heart palpitations. But nowhere in there was what she actually liked about Rarity, at least the part that isn't visible. It's not even that hard to fix, in your case. Many authors just decide it's enough to tell me she's in love and leave it at that. You do go back and show me plenty of their past interactions. Many authors would have to go back and do that, but you've already got it. So build on those a little. What times did Rarity do something that just made Fluttershy's heart melt, not because Rarity's attractive, but because it really made Rarity endearing to her? What qualities did she show that made Fluttershy really respect her? Basically, love's more than thinking she's pretty. What'd make you fall in love with someone? Show me those parts. But since you already have the structure there to do so, it's only a matter of adding that in.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2204

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>You shouldn’t go alone, if you ask your guard then I’m sure th-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs. You get it right elsewhere, so this must just be an oversight. And you have a few comma splices like this.

>Gasping, the young squire’s eyes rolled up//

A classic dangling participle. What it wants to describe isn't in the sentence. It explicitly says his eyes gasped.

>The sun was rising over the city, illuminating the towers of the Citadel of the Six with a red-yellow light as Coin Counter walked through the city streets.//

Given that you've already said they're in the city, it's redundant to say they're "city streets," in the same sentence, no less.

>The ship that had carried him, the Lightning Dust, had promised to carry him//

So it carried him, you say?

>tardiness — from//

You'll typically put spaces around an en dash, but not an em dash.

>Even though the streets of the city//

So, for the third time in two paragraphs, we're in a city, and for the second time, there are streets. Got it.

>loomed before him//

Only a page ago, you already described the same building as "looming over the horizon."

>by whomever created the work//

You actually need "whoever" here; it's the subject of the noun clause "whoever created the work" that's serving as the object of the preposition "by."

>'Where is Equestria?',

Doubled up on the punctuation there. When the quote already has end punctuation, don't add a comma.

>Written in a disorderly style with white paint, was a simple question//

There's no reason to have a comma there.

>Looking around, he noticed just how many brightly-colored figures he could see around him.//

This is already the 4th time in the chapter that he "noticed" something.

>Coin saw the eyes of several watchmen//

This kind of construction is at odds with your choice of narrator. You have a fairly shallow, but still limited, narrator, who's essentially Coin himself. The narrator expresses Coin's opinions as if his own. Yet you break from that form in a couple of ways. First, it's not really necessary to present quoted thoughts in most instances, since the narrator can simply express the thought for him. By making if quoted, you're forcing an extra distance between the reader and character that doesn't need to be there. Second, using certain classes of verbs (chiefly ones that govern knowledge or perception, like see, hear, know, wonder, hope) are largely unnecessary, because it's already implicit that whatever the narrator says is what the perspective character knows or perceives. It's enough to say that their eyes were following him. It's understood that he must have seen it, or the narrator couldn't have mentioned it. It's only worth pointing out that he saw something if you're emphasizing that he was specifically looking for it or it's something most people would miss.

Why is this book excerpt presented as a quotation? For that matter, why is it all italicized? Italics are best held for relatively short passages. It gets irritating to read in long stretches. If you're afraid the reader won't pick up that it's an article of writing, then put the source before it instead of after, but just by the subject matter and tone, it's pretty obvious.

>What I realize now, however, that such searching is concluded//

That "however" is really hurting the rhythm. You tend to put these little interruptions in sentences, but consider how start-and-stop it makes them. It detracts from the story's forward motion.

>look any words I might write//

Seems like there's a missing word.

I'm noticing far more "to be" verbs in chapter one than in the prologue. I hope that's not an indication of things to come. Of the unambiguous forms, I count 105, which is about one every 26 words, or every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs, since nothing happens. And that's how often nothing is happening. It's impractical to remove them all from a story, but you should try to use active verbs where possible. Even simple things like "he stood there" instead of "he was there" bring a much more active feel to the story.

>As Proximo folded the clothes he had chosen, he passed by the bed pushed against the left corner, as the morning light was spilling in from the window behind him, making the pattern of three diamonds on his floor and illuminating the work-desk strewn with drafts and uncompleted drawings he had started the day before.//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence. In addition to being repetitive, they're doubling up on the synchronization. In fact, participles also synchronize actions, so you have him folding his clothes, passing the bed, the light coming in the window, the light making a pattern, and the light illuminating the desk, all at the same time. The first two probably wouldn't be simultaneous, and the rest just make for a really busy sentence.

>I’ve been having trouble thinking of who deserves to the cold, dark, wet places no one wants//

Missing word.

>still only just//

That's an awful lot of redundancy.

You sometimes have unnecessary commas with conjunctions. There's a brief discussion of that at the top of this thread, but the quick version is that most times, you only use them when the conjunction separates clauses, not because they separate a compound verb.

>Coming up to the dining room//

And now you're starting to go overboard with the participial phrases. They're not very common in everyday conversation, so they stand out easily when overused. Authors of moderate experience often start to lean on them heavily for the variety and seeming sophistication they lend, but they very quickly get repetitive. Every sentence in this paragraph starts with one, for instance and for what it's worth, John Gardner, in his book The Art of Fiction, specifically calls them out as a weak way to begin a sentence.

>just start sending food up to her again, if she would just//

A common word for writers to overuse. You have another just a couple sentences later.

>and found himself right in front of her room//

This implies it was unexpected, but he knew exactly where he was going, and he wasn't distracted along the way up the stairs.

>spilling long trails of wax down to the floor. Proximo stepped gingerly around the mess, taking care not to spill//

Again, watch that repetition.

>Setting down the tray of food, Proximo prodded her on the side of the head//

I'd already caught you using a dangling participle, and if I looked for one, I bet I could find a misplaced modifier. These are the dangers of participles, and when you use so many, they're far more likely to turn up. I'd touched on this problem before: participles make things happen at the same time, so you have him setting the tray down while he prods her, but it's more reasonable for those to happen one after the other.

>She blinked, focusing on Proximo’s voice//

You've been in Proximo's perspective, so how could he know this? He could read it from her behavior, but the narrator's just stating it as a fact, which would require him to read her mind.

>Sorry Proximo//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I’ll bet Jestin will think it’s a fish, Proximo thought, perhaps he’ll write a song about it.//

The way you have that punctuated/capitalized, the assembled quote would be a comma splice.

>I can clean that up myself, you shouldn’t have to worry about it.//

And another comma splice.

>your’s//

No such word, and I'm not even sure what you were trying to say here.

>a emerald//

Typo.

>But, our belief must go deeper than just that itself//

No reason to have a comma there.

>A little magic, a different kind of spark//

I presume you have permission to use these lyrics?

>eagerly//

>nervously//
>sympathetically//
At times, you rely too heavily on these sorts of adverbs. These all occur within a few short paragraphs. They don't do much to create a visual in the reader's mind; in fact, they bypass a visual altogether. It's more engaging for you to portray a character in a way that I can deduce he's nervous rather than have the narrator just tell me outright.

>you were the one that wrapped up that investigation//

With sentient beings, you'll usually use "who" instead of "that."

>Coin stammered nervously//

And just a few paragraphs later, you're feeding me the same adverb.

>“Faithful and Strong”//

You've italicized one of the quotation marks, but not the other. If only part of the quote is italicized, don't italicize the quotation marks. If the whole quote is italicized, either way works, but have both quotation marks the same.

Your indentations are uneven in this chapter. It might be an artifact of importing from GDocs, but they need to be the same.

>Coin said, alarmed//

He holds the perspective. If he's alarmed, make the narration sound alarmed. You wander back and forth between having a very shallow limited narrator and something deeper which expresses the focus character's opinions.

>Counter could hear a sound, so quiet he could barely hear it//

Pretty repetitive language.

>walk in, one of the guards walked//

Watch that repetition again.

>The Warden asked for him, he isn’t just barging in on a whim.//

Comma splice.

>The light under the door seemed to be growing brighter, and the strange crackling sound from behind it was intensifying.//

See, there are times like this that you have a more limited narration. Subjective terms like "strange" are describing the character's impressions and opinions. And the use of "seem" is similar—an omniscient narrator would know whether the light was growing brighter, so "seem" wouldn't enter into it. Yet the narrator at times fails to show the reaction that the character does.

>still closed//

In this usage, hyphenate it. You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective.

>to not//

Reverse the order of these.

>Coin Counter asked, curious//

Besides spoon-feeding me his emotion again, this one was already self-evident.

>He was feeling extremely intimidated now//

This is probably the most off-putting thing about this chapter. It's constantly telling me how characters feel when it should be demonstrating instead. As stated, it's a cold fact, not something to connect me to the character or draw me into his viewpoint.

>across the empty I saw//

Across the empty what?

>It’s tendrils reached//

Its/it's confusion.

>Eye!//

When a question mark or exclamation mark is attached to a word italicized for emphasis, it's typically included in the italics as well. The same goes for reverting to normal font in an italicized passage.

>One That Finds The Truth//

Again, that would more appropriately be "who," not "that."

>center; each of the points of the star reaching towards ornate chairs that were placed around the table//

Misused semicolon. If you replaced it with a period, what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>I’m serious Proximo//

Missing a comma for direct address.

I'm in far enough now that I'll reduce the number of things I point out. It's a lot of the same stuff repeated, so I'll try to stick to new issues.

>not responding to Proximo reassurances//

Missing a possessive.

>have sent in past month//

Missing word.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, because they assume you want an opening quote. You can type two in a row and delete the first, or you can paste one in the right way.

>Hanna’s voice trailed into the room first. “... are you quite sure you don’t want help with those?”//

You don't need to narrated trailing in/off when it's already apparent from the punctuation. The same goes for cutoffs. And since this isn't picking up from an earlier sentence that was left hanging, capitalize it.

>Wrightchortled//

Needs a space.

>whomever he was//

Grammatically, that's a predicate pronoun, so still in nominative case: whoever.

>the Authority sent it’s own negotiator to do the same//

Its/it's confusion again. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes. "It's" either means "it is" or "it has."

>having both known their intentions and aided them in carrying them out//

The verb forms don't match here.

>Suddenly, the room erupted into shouts, as each of the people in the room raised their voices at the demands.//

Three things to say about this. "Suddenly" is a word best used sparingly. If it's truly sudden, it should be presented in a way that comes across as abrupt. Just saying the room erupted in shouts is enough. You have close repetition of "the room" in the same sentence. And you already said they shouted, so why are you also telling me they raised their voices?

>Proximo thoughts//

Missing possessive.

>Putting a massive hand on the handle, the Warden walked out the door//

This is an intermittent issue with your usage of participial phrases. They imply concurrent action, but there are times that such a thing doesn't make sense. Here, these are actions that would likely occur one after the other, not at the same time.

>Whomever it may have been//

Another spot where you actually need "whoever."

>Ironically//

In previous chapters, you'd been refreshing the opening quotes with each new paragraph.

>had lead the defensive force//

The past tense is "led."

>To show her gratitude, she would share command with this new Brony and the forces he brought; an army that would prove instrumental in winning the fight.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period and still have the grammar work, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>Various members of the Magic Friends could be seen in the same colors as they bowed to the passing Wardens; lavender robes with dark violet hoods, and necklaces shaped like six-pointed stars.//

Same deal.

>dimly lit//

A fairly cliched phrase that's also an oxymoron.

>However, with all the time he had spent admiring the Orrery//

Starting about here, the indentations get uneven for the next several pages. Actually, now that I look back, it's uneven throughout most of the chapter. I'd bet other chapters are this way, too.

>Coin could hear//

You've already used this phrasing several times recently. Besides being repetitive, I'm not sure what it adds. If the sound is audible, it's pretty self-explanatory that he'd hear it. This kind of emphasis tends to mean that it'd be hard to notice, but the story doesn't seem to be saying that. Besides, as preoccupied as he is, would he really pick up on things most others would miss? It doesn't quite ring true.

>Coin heard the quiet, distant voice of Lord Mars reply.//

And just two paragraphs later. It gets repetitive, and I don't know why it's worth it to keep pointing out he hears this stuff instead of just saying it happened.

>sendin—.//

The only end punctuation that can go after a dash is an exclamation mark or a question mark.

>‘tween//

Another backward apostrophe. Just keep an eye out for these. I won't mark any more.

>He turned and saw that the Warden of Generosity//

Similar to pointing out what he hears is pointing out what he sees. Is this really necessary? It's not like she was hard to notice.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2205

>>2204
>Her dark eyes were unusually large and piercing, almost as if she could stare into his soul.//
Didn't you give pretty much this exact description of her in an earlier chapter, when Coin first saw her?

>with Geral, Es, Greenheart, and I//

People are so afraid of misusing "me" that they make this mistake commonly. "Geral, Es, Greenheart, and I" is nominative case, the same as "we." "Geral, Es, Greenheart, and me" is objective case, the same as "us." Which sounds more correct, "with we" or "with us"?

>escape out of//

That's pretty redundant.

>Coin feeling more and more uncomfortable by the moment//

Through this whole meeting, you keep telling me exactly how he feels instead of painting a picture the reader can use to deduce it.

>God help us.//

I'll talk about this more at the end, but they're all taking the Brony fandom so seriously and treating the Wardens like virtual gods, so I'm not sure within the worldbuilding what an expression like this is supposed to mean.

>judgement//

judgment

>t— “//

You really shouldn't be putting a space after an em dash anyway, but note how that space has broken the smart quotes and made them backward. Sometimes smart quotes end up backward after a dash anyway.

>"Thus, we see that Friendship is truly Magic.//

You never closed those quotation marks. It's also odd that this part uses simple quotation marks, where you use fancy style ones everywhere else.

These song lyrics are quite good. As someone who agonized for 4 months to get just a few thousand words of Zecora's dialogue in perfect iambic pentameter, I can sympathize, and this is flawless.

>sitting himself next to Lady Semmer. Sitting next to her//

Pretty repetitive, unless you do something to acknowledge the repetition and make sure it's perceived as intentional.

>as soon as he walked in they start chattering and fly off.//

Some mixed tenses there. If she'd phrased it as a "whenever he walks in," the present would be appropriate, but she's talking about a single event in the past.

>isn’t it Jestin//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>you have my approval on that!” Jestin nodded in approval.//

You don't say...

>he would suited for this//

Missing word.

>Gallia, constantly better and forever disapproving//

I wonder if you didn't mean "bitter"?

>her’s//

There is no such word.

>“I can see who you care for more,” came the cold words, “join your friends then.”//

The way you punctuated and capitalized that, the whole quote would be a single sentence, but then it'd be a comma splice. Plus that would be "whom," if you think that character would know to use it there.

>She had always followed father’s lead.//

When used in place of a name, family relations get capitalized, so "Father's lead" versus "their father's lead."

>OK//

It's preferred to spell it out as "okay."

>There was hardly a cloud in the sky, and the mid-summer sun was blazing in the sky//

Kind of repetitive phrasing.

>from the reports Proximo had heard from//

Redundant "from."

>the marching Bronies began to fill into the large open space//

Not sure whether you meant "file into the space" or "fill the space."

>Every eye was upon the Lord Mars, as he began to speak.//

No need for a comma there. With "as," it tends to create a feel of "because" if you use one.

>he call to the crowd//

Typo.

>ya’//

I'm not sure what the apostrophe is supposed to signify here. She's not eliding any letters from the word.

>she yelled at one of the nearby sailors securing the sails//

Well, she only yelled that last bit, yet the dialogue tag applies to the whole quote. You might want to break this up.

>Cindy, give ‘em the thing with the code-names, I’ve got to tell this guy a word or two about knots.//

That second comma is a splice.

>and looked small on his massive chest.

>
>Proximo looked//
Close repetition of "looked." And another thing—you've been wavering on the edge of this throughout the story, but it's never bugged me too much. Your narrator is for the most part omniscient, but you have a few slips to put it in a more limited voice. Take this excerpt. It's expressing an opinion. And it's not entirely clear whose, though I would guess it's Proximo's. It might be worth tightening up that narrative voice in places. If you truly want omniscient, then it's best to make sure opinions are attributed to characters explicitly, or if you want to use a limited voice, you don't need the narrator to be so formal and factual all the time. It seems like you're going for a shallow limited voice, where the narrator is restricted to the knowledge and perceptions of the focus character without actually speaking for that character. If that's the case, then just watch for spots where the narrator seems to have an opinion of his own.

>clean-shaved//

clean-shaven

>I see you’ve already met my honest friend,” she said with a motion to the Warden, “may I introduce my assistant, Proximo Hart.”//

When assembled, that quoted sentence would be a comma splice.

>made of plain steel and was very heavy from the looks of it//

That "was very heavy" is pretty awkwardly phrased, as it's a poor match for the other verb form used.

>I remember one ship I served on — corridors//

On a ship, they're more properly called passages.

By now, I'm noticing that you use "seem" an awful lot. Aside from being repetitive, it's another verb that has no action and implies an opinion on the narrator's part.

>let his appreciation known//

Missing word.

>‘Lil//

Her name starts with that, yes? So what missing letters does the apostrophe signify? Nicknames generally don't use apostrophes anyway.

>Dustario was standing with several other orange-clad followers, laughing and joking as he was always inclined to, while Coin Counter was standing//

Note the repetitive "was standing," but it's also rarely necessary to use these weak "to be" verbs as auxiliary verbs, either. What is gained by phrasing it this way instead of "Dustario stood"?

>that reached down his belt//

Did you mean "to his belt"?

>did not deem to reply//

I'm not familiar with that phrasing, but it wouldn't seem to parse, as that's a transitive verb. Did you mean "deign"?

>“Hrm.”//

And your indentations change size here for some reason.

>our’s//

No such word.

>our friends lives//

Missing apostrophe.

>in disbelief//

>feeling equally angry and disturbed//
You hadn't been as bad about this in recent chapters, but here, you're spoon-feeding me character emotions again. Demonstrate them, let me see them manifest in how the characters look and behave.

>... we//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis, and when it's not picking up from an earlier sentence that trailed off, go ahead and capitalize it.

>Behind him, however, was Lord Mars, trailing behind//

He was behind, you say?

>Whelp//

This has become somewhat of a modern substitute for "well," but it's usually spelled "welp" in this case, as your spelling is a real word, and it would have Lady Wright seemingly insulting someone.

>That means you ’Crabapple’//

Missing comma for direct address.

>You already know my way, and I know yours’//

I don't see where you opened that single quotation mark. Unless you actually meant it as a possessive, in which case it's another word that doesn't exist. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>Mister Hands//

Man, I really, really hope that's not a horse reference, because if it is, it's in very poor taste.

>He thought about the first Wonderbolt//

Indentations are uneven in this chapter, too.

>who apprently one of several other ‘Apples,’//

Missing or jumbled wording, plus a typo.

>The guardsmen, the Wardens, the artists, the sailors, all the Bronies around; they were parts of a world that he had only just stepped into, standing confidently while he blundered around bleary-eyed and confused.//

Misused semicolon. There's no independent clause before it. A dash or colon would be fine.

>one of Greenheart jokes//

Missing possessive.

>Books of Black and White//

Not sure how you mean that. If that's the title of a single work, it'd be italicized, but if it's the generic name of a collection, like "The Theban Plays," then it's fine as is.

>with which he bellow out at every opportunity//

Missing/jumbled wording.

>It is crime and tragedy!//

Not sure whether that's a missing word or you mean for him to sound like a foreigner.

>But what do you all think?” he asked the people on the deck, “shall we have a song?”//

Not sure how you continue the quote as a single sentence when you've already given it end punctuation.

>began to play familiar song//

Missing word.

>between two women in the Loyal Friends to one from the Generous, stepping gracefully between//

Watch that repetition.

>but I’m think you’ll be a great help to us//

Syntax is off. You suddenly have a lot of this kind of error in this chapter. I don't know why.

>My superiors were understanding//

This ends a string of five paragraphs where the only narration that does anything to create a visual of what these two are doing is "There was a glint in his almond eyes, but his smile seemed sincere." Be careful about letting it go this long, or it starts to become abstract and less real, with that grounding in the fact that these are people standing around and talking rather than disembodied talking heads.

>Opening lines from the “Books of Black and White”//

Well, now you've put that in quotes, which make them minor works or parts of a larger work.

Well, this was unexpected. Your synopsis elicited nothing more than a groan from me, and I expected an easy rejection of a clumsily constructed "brony in Equestria" story. Man, was I wrong. This is very creative and absorbing, with memorable characters.

So what went wrong here? First the mundane stuff. Basically, if I had to point out something multiple times, it's a pervasive issue, like the uneven indentation, inconsistent use of commas with/without clauses (there's a brief guide to such at the top of this thread), frequent use of unnecessary constructions ("to be" as an auxiliary verb, begin/start actions, pointing out self-explanatory perceptions like saw/could see, backward leading apostrophes), etc.

On the more stylistic side, you do lapse into being very blunt about character emotions at times instead of getting me to deduce them. There's a short discussion of that, too, under "show versus tell" at the top of this thread. You also have a fairly inconsistent narrative viewpoint. When Coin is your focus character, the narration tends to be noticeably more subjective, with the narrator taking on his voice and imitating a conversational style, getting sut off, asking questions, and the like. When most of the other characters hold the perspective, the narrator is less subjective, still restricted to that character's knowledge and perceptions and stating opinions on their behalf, but still sounding rather formal and factual instead of a stream of thought. It's not something I'd call wrong, but it does end up making an uneven feel, and it'll make the reader more sympathetic with the characters that get a deeper treatment. With that contrast, the shallower perspectives will feel flatter, but I'll leave it up to you whether you want to do anything with it.

Now on to the aesthetic stuff. To put it in a nutshell, I'm getting lots of mixed signals. Where do I even start?

Everyone reveres these ideal figures, who are obviously analogs of the six main pony characters, if not them identically, yet they get little description. I can't tell whether they're supposed to be real beings within the story's context or not. They're treated as godlike figures, and yet there were a couple of references to God as well, so I don't know how to take that. You're making this as if it's the real and only world, that these aren't people who have physical existence elsewhere and have these adventures when they log in, a la something like .hack/sign or Sword Art Online. Yet there are little touches here and there that do suggest some other "real" world of which this is a derivative. For that matter, you call it Equestria, yet there's not the slightest bit of pony anything in the story, so it's an odd thing for them to call their world.

Sometimes this playing it both ways also undercuts the story's seriousness. References to Faust have become so cliched in the fandom that they get little more than an eye roll, so they're not likely to be treated seriously here. And the fandom itself: these characters are in a far more gritty situation, with hard-set beliefs and life and death at stake, so to refer to it in-story as a fandom tends to deflate that sense of importance and immediacy of the danger. It just disarms things and make it more ridiculous that these characters don't see it all more as some superficial diversion than a struggle for their existence. If you'd mean this as satire, that might be easier to take, but only in very specific instances does it possibly have that tone, and even then, it'd be ridiculously overblown. Yes, bronies have received a lot of push-back from various online communities, but nothing life-threatening, save a few individual instances.

Your first mention of seasons felt the same way too, where it felt more like an actual show they all worshipped, until we get to see that you meant seasons in a more astronomical sense. It might do you well to make that clearer up front.

That said, this is a unique premise, and I'm willing to cut it some slack. Many people will probably go into it with the same attitude I did, and those kinds of things that make it seem like these characters actually are this fanatical about something so trivial as a TV show will probably cost you story views. But I wouldn't go so far as to make you change them. Some of it wouldn't be hard to do, like maybe substituting a more appropriate word than "fandom," but other parts of it would be pretty extensive to alter, and enough of it works that I think it clears the threshold. Give it some thought, anyway.

So it's really only those more mechanical and stylistic things that I want to make sure you address. I won't have time to check the entire story again, as I've spent nearly two weeks going over this version of it, so I'll just have a glance over chapter 1 and assume it's representative. When you're ready to resubmit, mark it as "back from Mars."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2206

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>As she stared//

>As more of the grey resolved itself into complexities//
>As soon as that realisation had struck//
There are certain structures that authors starting to gain some experience tend to overuse because they feel it sounds more sophisticated, but since they're not constructions used much in everyday speech, they stand out more and easily get repetitive when used too much. All three of these occur in the same paragraph.

>She was sure she had one, she needed it to be alive, after all.//

Comma splice.

>Still, progress was painstaking.//

I'm also noticing that you use an awful lot of "to be" verbs, at least in the early going. Maybe that's just symptomatic of this part having lots of description to establish the setting, but you don't want the story to feel so stagnant at the beginning, where you're trying to hook the reader. This paragraph is full of them. It's impractical to remove them from a story altogether, but you should use more active verbs where possible. Take this sentence for example:
>The walls were concrete like the ceiling and the floor was covered with shiny off-white tiles of an indeterminable material.//
This could easily be rephrased with active verbs, like:
Walls of the same concrete as the ceiling ran down to a floor covered in shiny off-white tiles of an indeterminable material.

>On the ceiling was a fan wobbling slightly from side to side as it spun.//

Now look at how this paragraph is structured. You want it to mirror a thought process. She's lying down, so it's natural that she'd see the ceiling first. Then she follows the walls down to the floor, but here, her attention snaps up to the ceiling again. Try to organize it in the order she'd actually see it.

>Rarity noticed that there was another pony next to her.//

Now a word about perspective. You've had the narrator stating Rarity's thoughts for her and taking a conversational style, so you have a limited narrator. By its nature, then, the narrator can only say things that Rarity knows or perceives. It's already implied that Rarity notices this other pony just because the narrator says the pony is there, so there's no need to point out her noticing it, unless you're making special emphasis that it's a detail most would miss, which this isn't, or that she was specifically looking for it, which tends not to work with the word "notice." The same goes for any verbs of perception or knowledge, like want, wish, wonder, know, hear, see, etc.

>hope - an inkling of confirmation - that//

Please use a proper dash for asides or interruptions, not a hyphen. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>If Rarity was able to move, she would’ve reeled. Doctors were supposed to help ponies, not burn them.//

Look at how limited a narrator you've been using. He's basically giving us Rarity's stream of internal thoughts. This is no exception, but this is the kind of thing that should be upsetting her, yet she's saying it so calmly. Note what I said before about perception verbs. One of them I listed was "wonder." You actually have done a good job of avoiding that one. Rarity's wondering a lot of things, but instead of saying so, you're giving me her internal thoughts, the questions she's asking to express that wonder. So far, so good. But here, this should horrify her, yet the way the narrator's phrasing it, it just sounds like she's stating a bland fact. Would she be adding emphasis to certain words here, or maybe shouting something in her mind?

>Why, and by who?//

Whom, if you think that's something Rarity would know.

>The doctor moved out of Rarity’s vision and she could hardly afford the time to wait and see whether she would come back.//

You have separate clauses here, i.e., separate subjects that each get their own verb, so you'll normally want to put a comma before the conjunction (doctor moved... and she could). The opposite case is where the same subject performs two verbs. Many people put an unnecessary comma between the verbs in that case, but it isn't needed.

>wiggled a forehoof, than a back hoof.//

Then/than confusion.

>squeem//

What in the world is this?

>She had hoped her legs would do her the courtesy of supporting her weight, but they seemingly had other plans.//

You're undercutting the moment's tension with humor. She's probably fearing for her life, so this isn't really reflective of the kind of mood she'd be in.

>She was confused and so very scared.//

So make the narration sound like she's confused and scared.

>It was a dented plate of metal polished smooth in irregular blotches from high traffic//

Missing your end punctuation.

>but Rarity only had feelings of contempt towards him//

So demonstrate them. It'll mean far more than her just saying so. What physical sensations does the sight of him cause? What kinds of mental images?

>I already said no.”//

Missing a line beak here.

>opposite of//

You don't need the "of."

>presumably from one of the armoured ponies//

You just used "presumably" a few sentences ago. Try to avoid close repetition like that.

>Luckily, there was no blood.//

A couple of problems. You ended the previous paragraph with the same phrasing. But these are also the only two sentences over the two paragraphs that don't start with the subject. This will still be true of the majority of your sentences, but you're at the extreme end of that. When sentence after sentence has something repetitive like this, it gets to be like reading a list. Try for some more variety.

>Through her magic she could feel it recoil against his jaw, likely breaking it. She winced in sympathy. That must have hurt.//

Again, this is awful bland wording for how she must be feeling about all this.

>which had been functioning only a concoction of fear and survival instinct//

Something doesn't quite parse there.

>whirring and grinding//

Same with the repetition. You just used "grinding" in the first sentence of this same paragraph.

>Pack lightly.//

Either you didn't mean this to be a new paragraph, or you forgot to add another blank line and indent.

>She needed to buy some rugs, the floor was freezing.//

Comma splice.

>The Forces that Shape The World//

That second "the" doesn't need to be capitalized.

>less words//

"Less" is for collective quantities, like money. You need "fewer."

>ladden//

laden

>“Ah, Spike. I was just coming to see where you’d gone off to.”//

Why is there a line break here? And you do the same thing a couple paragraphs later.

>cutiemark//

cutie mark

>who’s is it then//

whose

>afterall//

after all

>cruel. ”//

Extraneous space.

>‘Front door’ was a term Twilight applied loosely, the double-doors were two stories high and weighed over a ton each.//

Comma splice.

>Twilight turned back to Spike, “I love you very much.//

You've punctuated that like the first part is a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb in it.

>only she could possible be familiar with//

Typo.

>Many shopkeepers were assembling their wares on the roadside; from sweet candies; to dusty books from obscure philosophers.//

Not sure why you're using semicolons there.

>She pushed passed the mares//

Passed/past confusion.

>That was suggestion//

Missing word.

>“I hate to interrupt,” Rarity said, “But is that//

When you go out of and back into a quote with commas like this, you don't capitalize the second part of the quote.

>The parchment wasn’t old, the scroll could very well have been made yesterday.//

Comma splice. I assume you get the picture on these by now. I won;t keep marking them.

>Celestia smiled.//

Every few paragraphs, you start with one of these two-word sentences of what Celestia does. And two of them not so far apart are this same one.

>far reaching//

Hyphenate.

>we’ve found Items//

Why is that capitalized?

>“This is going to be so cool.”//

Leave the closing quotation marks out of th italics so they match the opening ones.

>And Fluttershy looked at her friends with worry.//

You'll usually want to avoid identifying emotions directly like this. Paint a picture. Demonstrate her acting and looking worried, and it's much more vivid.

>it burned her mouth when she breath//

Typo.

>they could just make of the edge of fishing village//

That first "of" should be an "out," and there's a missing word.

>the edge of furious ocean//

Missing word.

Let me back up to the beginning of this paragraph again. Here's the ending of each sentence:
>melting a circle into the snow bank they stood on//
>leading to a sheer drop of a hundred feet//
>spewing out to the edge of furious ocean//
>wafting into the howling wind//
>bobbing around to the frantic rhythm of the waves//
See how you end every sentence in a participial phrase? It gets very repetitive.
Now let's look at the next paragraph the same way:
>leading up and away into a rugged series of mountains//
>twisting the vapours into dancing spirals//
It's still going on!

>snow covered//

Hyphenate.

>I am doing my upmost//

utmost

>the path is chosen for all ponies involved is just.//

That first "is" shouldn't be there.

>two royal guards in a winter outfit//

There's one outfit for two guards?

>she gestured her hoof around,”//

You don't need that comma, there's a missing space, and the lack of that space has turned the quotation marks the wrong way.

>She scoffed.//

You have this exact same sentence twice in the paragraph.

>you must understanding//

Typo.

>we could have case//

Missing word.

>Shining Armour//

I don't mind you using British spellings in general, but this one can actually be called incorrect, since it's a proper noun.

>second worse//

second-worst

>shoe selling//

Hyphenate.

>‘em//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes wrong, since they assume you want a single opening quotation mark. You can paste in an apostrophe from somewhere else, or you can type two single quotes in a row and delete the first. Keep an eye out for these, as I won't mark any more.

>back around and immersed himself back//

Watch that close repetition.

>himself back in his scrawling, whistling to himself//

Wow, and again in the same sentence.

>forty three//

Hyphenate.

>head first//

That's one word.

>who you may know//

whom

>still standing still//

C'mon.

>Although he would deny it, it was obvious to the majority of ponies that his idolisation of Princess Twilight went beyond the purely professional.//

Given that you're using a limited narrator in his perspective, it's an odd observation for him to make about himself that this is something obvious to everyone. If he really knows that, then why deny it?

>On second thoughts//

That's singular in the normal phrasing.

>Starbound gave a not-at-all reassuring grin.//

How does he know that's how it comes across? This is a rather external viewpoint at odds with the limited narration being in his perspective. He wouldn't even be able to see his own grin and evaluate how it looked.

>he being so awkward//

Missing word.

>that?//

When you have a question mark or exclamation mark on a word italicized for emphasis, include it in the italics.

>Ponydom//

Why is that capitalized? We don't capitalize "humankind," for instance.

>back in front of the group as they spread out, drawing attention back//

More close repetition.

>“I think-” she said, tracing a hoof along the wall “-that this is another teleporter.”//

Two things to say about this. First, that's just a speech tag, not a narrative aside, so why use dashes for it? Second, you use a lot of these narrative aside structures, to the point that they're getting repetitive as well. You want the reader to remember the story not the fact that these writing quirks kept popping up.

>Starbound respond//

Typo.

>“Have you sent anypony through it yet?”//

Why is there a line break here?

>Again, she felt angry, or at least annoyed//

Again, demonstrate this. Don't just say she feels this way, or it won't mean much.

You seem to have inadvertently left a few notes at the end of the chapter.

Okay, there's a good start here. It doesn't have the kinds of plot or character problems that can be rather involved to fix, but it does have a number of more mechanical and stylistic ones. Basically, if I had to mark a type of error more than a couple of times, then it's pretty pervasive. So pay attention to those. Other than that, it's mostly things like repetition of words, phrases, and structures, and how bland the narration often sounds for something that's supposed to reflect the focus character's immediate train of thought. It's also very direct with the emotional context at times, bluntly telling me how characters feel instead of making a visual image out of it. There's a section at the top of this thread under "show versus tell" that explains a bit about what this is and why it works.

One other piece of the repetition that I'd only touched on once is the "to be" verbs. Of the unambiguous forms, I counted 496 of them in the chapter. That's about once every 27 words, or about one every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens, and this is how often nothing happens. Try to keep things active. You get somewhat of a pass for using these in dialogue, but the narration could really stand to be more active.

The last thing I'll say is that your plan for how to finish the story is a little troubling. We don't want a story that is "unnecessarily detailed" as your comment says, and stretching things out to 100 chapters, just because, isn't a good way to create an engaging story. The extended synopsis you provided does sound fine, but we'd hope you'd be realistic about what's a reasonable pace to have all that happen, plus how fast you can reasonably get it written, particularly since fanfiction readership is on the decline—the longer you take, the fewer people who will read it, though that's a concern purely for you. How many people may or may not read it has little to do with an evaluation of its quality.

I have to say I do rather like the other title you mentioned better. What's here is pretty vague as to how it relates to the story. I guess it refers to that possibility Sparky mentioned of all this material being a legacy that an alicorn civilization left behind, but that's unclear, and it's not made a thematic element so far. It would also depend on whether you want to hold the time-travelling nature of the artifact as a surprise, since the other title would spoil that.

On the synopsis, I'll only say that it's pretty cliched and unsatisfying to have it ask rhetorical questions that it doesn't answer.

So if you can get all those mechanical issues fixed as well as the repetition and the portrayal of emotion (both through eliminating "telly" language and making the limited narration more commensurate with the perspective characters' emotional states), then I could see posting it.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2210

What do you mean by 'to be' verbs? I've never heard of them before. I did a control+f of it but couldn't find anything here that explained it clearly. And Google isn't helping either. They're not usually called something else, are they? Do they have anything to do with active or passive voices?
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2212

>>2210
"To be" verbs do show up a lot in passive voice, but they can occur in active voice as well, both as main verbs and auxiliary verbs. They just describe a state of being without anything actually happening.

The standard conjugation is:
I am
you are
he/she/it is
we are
they are

Other forms exist as well, but some are tough to do a Ctrl-f search on, since I'd have to see the context to know whether they're used as such. For example, "He's going" contains one of those verbs, since the contraction expands to "he is." But the same contraction can mean something else, as in "He's gone away," which expands to "He has gone away."

So I only do a Ctrl-f on the unambiguous forms, which are:

are
aren't
was
wasn't
were
weren't
is
isn't
am
I'm
you're
we're
they're
be
being
been

Obviously, a string like "are" is going to turn up a lot in many words, so I have to be careful how I search for it. For that one, I'll do searches on " are." and " are," and " are " (note the spaces).

Even a simple change like "He was there" to "He stood there" creates a much more active feel. It gives your story mor forward momentum and makes it more interesting to read. Sometimes, it's too difficult or awkward to rephrase, and it's fine to have some around. Since I don't know which story you're replying about, I can't grab specific examples or say whether it was more an issue of them turning up in clumps or if they were prevalent throughout the story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2234

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Their segmented steel armour whistled//

Seems like a poor design. It would only whistle under certain circumstances, and letting it do so ensures they're not going to be very stealthy.

>The young griffons coat was the colour of fresh clay//

Missing apostrophe, and that's a very ambiguous color description. Clay comes in lots of colors.

>Vig’//

Apostrophes typically aren't used with nicknames.

>‘cos//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row, then delete the first.

There are three structures that writers of moderate experience almost always overuse, because they seem elegant and sophisticated. The problem is that they aren't used much in everyday conversation, so they stand out easily, and they quickly become repetitive. They are the participial phrase (making his belly rumble), the absolute phrase (his talons clicking on the flagstones of the ground floor), and the "as" clause (As Vigild tore into his breakfast). And you use all three quite a lot. It's not that excessive, but it's really borderline.

>He was cunning, brave and vicious; the perfect traits for a warrior.//

Misused semicolon. It should be interchangeable with a period, but if you put one there, the part of the sentence after it couldn't stand as complete.

>Theod could sense his father’s sadness.//

How so? If I don't get to see it, too, it doesn't maen as much to me.

>much like tonight’s, much//

Watch the close repetition of words like that.

>They demanded a hostage in return for allowing the new chieftain to rule.//

I don't understand this at all. Why does he need their permission to rule? And what interest do they have in her? They don't seem to have a use for her other than coercion, but he volunteered her, so they must have had some means of making him comply anyway. So why not use those means? They don't need her, too.

>See you at the shrines, brother.//

Family relations get capitalized when used as terms of address. You got it right earlier with "Father."

>This is stupid Vig//

You're missing some commas for direct address like this one.

>up-//

Please use a proper dash. This is a recurring issue throughout the story.

>fledgeling//

Your spelling of this is inconsistent.

>large as a tercels head//

Missing apostrophe.

>And Vigild had lead them straight to it.//

The past tense is "led."

You're having a lot of trouble deciding whether you want a limited or omniscient narrator. At times, the narration takes on a character's voice and speaks his thoughts for him, like this:
>Theod was right. He had killed them both with this stupid plan.//
At other times, it stays formal and factual for long stretches, and even uses references like "the fledgling" that wouldn't make sense for a limited narrator (would Vigild really refer to his brother like that in his own thoughts?).

>its victims neck//

You're missing lots of apostrophes.

>I, heir of Eboric//

The "heir of Eboric" part comes across as an appositive far more than a term of address. You had me confused that he was claiming to be yet another of Eboric's children.

>three-dozen//

No reason to have a hyphen there.

>Then it settled on one of pure dread. Concerned//

Be careful just naming emotions like this. It leaves things rather abstract and doesn't create a visual image at all. It's more engaging to read characters' emotions from their appearance and behavior, much like real people do by observing each other.

>a days flight//

Another missing apostrophe.

>Ripping the blade from the wood//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>razor edged//

In this usage, hyphenate the phrase.

>Mostly.” The Legate said//

Punctuation/capitalization. I thought you'd been getting this right in earlier chapters, so I was surprised to see the error turn up here. And then you do it again a short time later:
>“Oatmeal.” The Legate said//
Scan through the story for these. I won't mark any more. If you're not sure what's wrong with that, there's a short section of punctuation and capitalization of dialogue at the top of this thread.

>You will likely be placed in the care of a senatorial family somewhere. most use hostages as part of their household staff.//

Comma splice.

>But the chance to see his father again… that could not be passed up. What else was there to say but...//

This is another place where you waver on what kind of narrative voice you use. This is clearly Theod's thought process expressed through the narration, making it a limited narrator. Yet you go through long stretches where it's more dispassionate and factual. If you want it to represent Theod's (or whatever character's you use for a given scene) stream of thought, you need to check in with that every few paragraphs at least to keep reminding the reader of that voice, or you'll lose it and revert to omniscient by default. But in this perspective, it's also implied that anything the narrator says is Theod's thoughts or perceptions, so when you refer to him as something like "the tercel," you imply that's how he thinks about himself, which is weird.

>Theods waist//

Missing apostrophe.

>He felt like a traitor.//

Given how limited a narrator it seems like you're trying to use, don't leave this as a cold fact. If you were in his place, would you just think "I feel like a traitor" and leave it at that? Surely there's more, and this narration is supposed to be his internal thought process. So what other thoughts and images come to mind? What physical sensations might he feel?

>quarters.” He said//

Punctuation/capitalization again. I won't mark any more of these.

>Of course sir//

>On schedule sir//
>Follow me Barley//
>I doubt it’ll be an easy assignment sir.//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>I suspect//

Set this off with a comma.

>up… “ He said

I said I wouldn't mark any more of these, but there's another issue besides the capitalization. You have an extraneous space after the ellipsis, which has made the quotation marks backward.

>Dont//

Typo.

>Theod heard the lock be removed from the door and the wall that he rested upon swung outwards.//

Without a comma between the clauses, this is confusing. At first, it sounds like he also heard the door open.

>between, each//

Extraneous space.

>cirran//

You'd been capitalizing that.

>The legionaries’ carriage sat next to the wagon, Pruina and his troops climbing out and heading towards the largest of the wooden buildings.//

For some reason, that reads awkwardly, and I can't quite put my finger on why. Maybe it's because the focus seems backward. An absolute phrase usually adds detail to something important, but here, the fact that the two wagons are sitting beside each other is utterly uninteresting, then the pertinent stuff comes in the absolute phrase.

>rearing up and meeting Theod’s glare//

Theod did the same action just two paragraphs ago. It gets repetitive.

>The tercels cronies//

What's with all the missing apostrophes in this story?

>You don't want that, it’d ruin your pretty makeup.//

Comma splice.

>Theods arm//

Seriously. Find that apostrophe key.

>as she lead him//

The past tense is "led."

>I am Aella if you don't remember me//

Missing comma and end punctuation.

>was oddly//

Extraneous space.

>Auxillia//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing this, too.

>whom was standing near whom//

That first "whom" should be a "who."

>pouring over a large ledger//

poring

>began digging through his bag//

Pretty much the exact same phrasing from a paragraph ago, but you're also using a lot of these "start" and "begin" actions, which are rarely necessary. Any given action begins, so it's redundant to point it out, unless that beginning is noteworthy for some reason, like it's abrupt, or the action never finishes.

>thick tunic//

Extraneous space. I won't mark any more of these. Just do a Ctrl-f for two spaces.

>contents: A bowl, a spoon, and a few other small tools for grooming and cleaning.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>the other his name spelled out in Cirran text//

Nobody was asking names when handing out the bags. How did they know which one to give him? And they just brought him there. That's rather short notice to have a personalized item made.

>super”//

Missing end punctuation.

>They said that they would give us land and slaves, maybe we will be able to.//

Comma splice.

>Senators//

There are numerous words like this that you intermittently capitalize, and only some of them would seem to warrant it. Why is this capitalized, for instance?

>slate//

Missing end punctuation.

>lowborn//

>low-born//
You spell this differently just a few paragraphs apart. And you seem to use it as an insult the first time and not the second.

>who he had entrusted it to//

whom//

>Fearsome spikes protruded from the crown making the helmet itself a useful weapon should the need arise.//

Needs a couple of commas.

>He drew it with a shout, and all hell broke loose.

>
>He and his warriors broke//
Watch that close repetition.

>Vigilds helm//

Dude.

>down on the tercel again and again, smashing it down//

More repetition.

>tercels head//

>tercels ribs//
It's right there, next to the "enter" key.

>bones healed and hide knitted//

Don't you want those in the other order? "Knit" is far more commonly applied to bones.

>chieftains heart//

>Gustaves eyes//
*sigh*

>He hefted the Gustave//

Extraneous word.

>“I am leaving for Angenholt, father.”//

As a term of address, that would be capitalized. This isn't the only time it happens.

>a Cirrans’//

Number mismatch.

>On your feet Adal//

Missing comma for direct address.

>place”//

Missing end punctuation.

Everything here is pretty straightforward, so I don't need to go into a discussion. You could use a good editing pass, some of the emotions are conveyed too directly, and the perspective isn't handled consistently.

Plus tearing the guy in half was pretty ridiculously over the top.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2246

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>speaking to all of her friends in her throne room, surrounding the map//

You're already getting into trouble with participial phrases. They like to modify th nearest prior object, so it sounds like you're saying that the throne room is surrounding the map. While true, that's obvious. But why do you even need to mention the throne room? The reader will already know the map is there. Not that you can't mention it, but this isn't the smoothest way.

>weekend-“//

Please use a proper dash for asides or cutoffs. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread. Also note that dashes and hyphens can break smart quotes. These are backward. You can paste one in the right way or type a second one right after it, then delete the first.

>Ah Ha//

Why is that second word capitalized?

>in frustration//

>with disgust//
Beware of spelling out emotion so bluntly. If she's frustrated, how would she look and act? Think about how you would know someone was frustrated just by looking at them. Give me the same kind of evidence and let me deduce that she's frustrated. That's how it works in real life, so if you write that way, it feels more natural and authentic. There's a longer discussion at the top of this thread under "show versus tell." You use this prepositional phrase structure and -ly adverbs an awful lot to convey emotion, and they just don't do much to create a visual image or connect me with the characters.

>rebels//

>royalist//
You capitalize these inconsistently.

>Starlight Glimmer says//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>Woah//

I don't know why the vast majority of ponyfic authors can't spell this right.

>ya’ll//

...or spell that right, either.

>which varied between annoyed, confused, and disgusted//

So let me see a few of these and judge for myself.

I don't know why Twilight wouldn't just pick a figure who was actually present at the battle, but it is so like her to actually go many miles away in the name of accuracy.

>for not taking her feelings seriously//

Just like with emotions, don't be so direct in supplying character motivation and intent to the reader.

>Ladies and Gentlecolts//

Why is "Gentlecolts" capitalized?

>aside; younger siblings//

Misused semicolon. If you replaced it with a period, what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>More angered voices began to rise up.//

You just described Rumble as angry, so it's a bit repetitive to use the word again so soon.

>“My Dad and I have been going to three reenactments a year since I was a colt//

Missed an indentation here.

>Peach//

Why is this capitalized? There are seemingly random words capitalized here and there throughout the story.

>His eyes finally rested on the majestic figure of Spike//

You'd been telling the scene from Spike's perspective, but here, you're switching to this soldier's. It's a bit jarring, as there's no indication you've done so, and it doesn't serve a purpose to.

>within less than//

Redundant.

>There is no way Dash could lose to a loser like Spike…was there?//

Slip into present tense again. And is this Spike's thought? It seems to be more from Dash's perspective, and if so, why are you jumping over there?

>back at her shattered legions. She turned her attention back//

Watch close word repetition like that.

>she, too took off, fleeing for safety//

No reason for that first comma to be there, unless you're going to pair it with another after the "too." This also doesn't sound much like Dash to run. She's not even in any real danger.

>Twilight was furious that something had ruined the reenactment, and her voice reflected that.//

So far it's unclear who holds the perspective in this scene and is thus making this judgment about her voice. But you're also really spelling out Twilight's motivation again, where it'd be better to imply it.

>Second, Spike, her very own Spike//

Wait, you're in Twilight's perspective? Then why did you have her making a very external assessment about her tone of voice?

>appreciation for the final technical details//

Did you mean "finer"?

>He…ruined the First Battle at Minotaur Run?/

Missing your closing quotation marks.

>dog pile on you…” Rarity’s voice trailed off.//

You don't need to narrate trailing off or getting cut off when it's already apparent from the punctuation. And if you were going to have Twilight as your perspective character for this scene, why have the camera sty behind when she leaves? If that's what you want, then why not have Rarity as your perspective character?

>pulled out the mouth-written epistle//

Pretty repetitive with this from the previous paragraph:
>He pulled a letter out of his saddlebags//

>In the Year of Our Lord//

I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean in an Equestrian context.

>result was the result//

You don't say...

>W..//

Not sure what this is supposed to be. An ellipsis with a missing third dot and space?

>A chorus of wild cheers was heard in support of his statement.//

The passive voice isn't doing anything here.

>Do you LIKE slavery?//

I suppose so? I'm not sure it's a good idea to have such an exact parallel with the human world rather than inventing something more show-like, since that's the feel you're going for.

>He said nothing, but his face held a cheeky, yet tired expression.//

But he's been your perspective character for this scene. How does he know what his face looks like? And why would that be his way of deducing his own emotions?

>If you aren’t going to end this, than I will!//

Than/then confusion.

You actually had a fairly smooth transition of perspective from Spike to Twilight, but then you absolutely snap it back, right here:
>Back in town, Spike sat atop Starlight Glimmer and watched Twilight slowly disappear into the horizon.//

>God has fixed the time for my death//

You're implying quite a bit of world-building there that the story doesn't supply, but I guess I can live with it as a direct quote analog.

>Twilight made a strange face.//

She holds the perspective, but that sure doesn't sound like her opinion. This scene seems awfully disconnected fro the story, though. There doesn't seem to be any point in having ot other than to make a joke about Twilight having so much staff and introducing the new character, but you could have done that in the next scene where Spike opposes her. There's no action flowing into or out of this scene with the ones around it.

>is…is//

I haven't been commenting on this, but unless it starts a sentence, leave a space after an ellipsis. It formats better that way.

>as he lie on the ground//

Typo.

>Let us cross the over the river//

Extraneous word.

>ah’m//

If you insist on using "Ah" as a substitute for "I," at least capitalize it the same.

>‘im//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can fix them the same way I described for the broken smart quotes with dashes.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>Until by literal breath ceases from my literal body//

Typo.

>a millennia//

You're mixing singular and plural there.

>Yes, sister.//

As terms of address, family relations get capitalized.

>I wasn’t really sure who I wanted to win.//

whom

>Spike was certainly a gallant general; sort of a villain that I loved to hate.//

Misused semicolon.

Why'd you stop indenting paragraphs?

>“Oh Twilight,” she waved a hoof, “it’s a reenactment.//

Your speech attribution has no speaking action. You can't just tack any old verb onto dialogue with a comma.

>That was a little tyrannical, please don’t think that that’s okay to do.//

Comma splice.

That last paragraph is an odd joke. For one, it's a horribly sudden change of perspective, and for another, it comes out of nowhere. If you'd carried any imagery through the story of Starlight being dissatisfied with her position, then this would have provided closure to it, but You don't even introduce it until now. You should have planted the seeds for this long ago.

>to not//

Swap the order of these.

>amount of ponies//

"Amount" is for collective quantities, like money. You want "number."

>Trixie Lulabooth//

This kind of loses its power since it's not also part of a reenactment. I guess it's necessary if you want Twilight to be surprised by it, but it'd be just like Twilight to include this as part of the reenactment, and you've stuck to the human parallel as having actually happened in Equestria so strictly until now.

>SMACK!!!//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound and the action.

>Princessus!",//

Lose that comma.

I appreciate the touches of authenticity, like how Spike gets removed from the action. I wonder about the picnicking princesses though—they persisted in watching the entire war, but I'm guessing they were a reference to the people who actually did watch the first few battles, thinking they would be amusing.

There are a number of detailed mechanical things, but the most crucial ones to get right would be more consistency in the perspectives and more demonstration of emotion instead of outright informing the reader of it. If you can get those tuned up, I'd gladly post this. It was a very funny take on actual events, with clever jokes in just the right places.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2256

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>released a breath he hadn't realized he'd been holding//

This is incredibly cliched.

>leave—“//

Dashes can break smart quotes sometimes. These are backward. I see more of these in later chapters.

>SunPrincess//

Typo.

>this—” her lips curled in distaste at the word “'Blessing'//

Put another dash where the quote picks back up.

>And we're proud to remember what so many have forgotten; that Equestria once had two princesses, and that we have vowed to keep faith with the one who rules the night.//

The semicolon isn't really used right. What comes after it couldn't stand as its own sentence. You're clarifying/defining here, so a colon would work.

>you've never seen Cee and I fighting//

Actually, "me" is the correct choice there. But it's your call whether Nebula knows that.

>It keeps you grounded, Cee//

Look how often they're using direct address in this conversation. Then think about how often you do so in a real conversation.

>He half-expected her fry Nebula with a bolt of concentrated sunlight//

Missing word.

>she seemed amused rather than offended//

Let me see the evidence he uses to come to this conclusion so I ca judge for myself. You're intermittently feeding me character emotions like this instead of getting me to deduce them. There's a short discussion of the topic at the top of this thread, under "show versus tell."

>said “But//

Missing punctuation.

>looked to//

Extra space in there.

>Celestia spoke apologetically//

Now that I've gotten through part of this conversation, look at how structurally repetitive this section can be. So many of the paragraphs are a single line, and it's not exactly a rapid-fire exchange, so it tends to mean you're skimping on the narration. Plus you frequently put these really short sentences leading off paragraphs:
>Celestia laughed.//
>Nebula scoffed.//
>Nebula grinned.//
>He gestured.//
>He shook his head, baffled.//
>Nebula interrupted.//
>He balked, startled.//
That's all on the same page.

So only now is it apparent that this takes place during the pilot episode. That makes me wonder: You have stained glass windows depicting Luna in this office, but when she gets healed at the end of the episode, ponies seem astonished that Nightmare Moon is Celestia's sister. It's kind of unclear, I guess. The story at the beginning of the episode refers to sisters, but it doesn't seem like ponies are aware of the story, that it's only there for the viewer's benefit. Maybe they were surprised that Luna was Nightmare Moon, but many seem to be surprised that Celestia even has a sister. So is this secret information? Is it privileged knowledge that the Night Guards keep?

>mouth “No//

Missing comma.

>Sky looked out across the cityscape.//

Given that something alarming has just happened and two other ponies have dashed out onto the balcony to try ascertaining what, it's kind of mood-killing to have him ramble calmly about what all is in the city. It's not the time to go on a tangent.

>the street was buckled up into jagged-toothed crater//

Missing word.

>party, out all night partying//

Kind of repetitive.

>erase you//

Extra space.

>vesperquines//

For some reason, you capitalize this in some places and not in others. But you haven't been capitalizing any other races.

>Sky was watching Nebula as the alicorn spoke, hoping for some indication that she was not simply bending her neck to this creature; some sign that she was buying time, readying a plan.//

Another misused semicolon.

>“What are you doing,” Sky cried out.//

Isn't that a question?

>For her to say that, so matter-of-factly....//

One too many dots there.

>its a miserable paste//

It's/its confusion.

>ill-afford//

No reason to have a hyphen there.

>I hate to ask you this, but is your princess responsible for the sun not rising.//

That's a question, too, right?

>twenty furlong//

In this usage, hyphenate.

You'd been pretty good about using active language through most of the story. but there are a couple of places where "to be" verbs crop up in clusters. They're inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens. They tend to make a story stagnate. Look at this paragraph:
>No, if anything, it was simply that the thought of abandoning Nebula here grated on him. He was a member of the Night Guard, and Nebula was his boss. He was full of doubt that there was much either of them could do at this point, but damned if he was going to leave her to try on her own.//
You've got 6 instances of "was" alone in only 3 sentences.

>Shards of wood sprayed across the back wall of the room and strips of ruined cloth drifted slowly to the floor.//

You play both sides of this rule at times. There's a short discussion of "comma use with conjunctions" at the top of this thread. You'll normally use one when you have multiple clauses, but usually not where you just have two verbs linked to the same subject.

>Nebula stood unflinchingly before her.//

It's more a visual thing, but look at the paragraphs leading up to this. 6 of 7 paragraphs start with either "Nebula" or "Nightmare Moon." It's somewhat repetitive in structure.

>“There. See?”//

I'd recommend putting a speaking attribution on this. It's not clear until a couple sentences later who says this.

>hearthswarming eve//

Hearth's Warming Eve

>distant distant//

Repeated word.

>“They won't see us at this distance,”//

And then a close repetition in the next sentence.

>uhh....” He trailed off,//

You don't need to narrate trailing off when it's apparent from the punctuation. The same would be true of getting cut off.

>explaining his//

Extraneous space.

>Nightmare gave her a sharp look.//

You're saying something here, but I'm not sure you realize you're saying it. The scene is in a shallow perspective with Sky, so the narration essentially reflects his thoughts and perceptions. So to have the narration refer to her as Nightmare Moon implies that he still thinks of her that way. Nebula's instructed him to call her only Princess Luna, yet he recently couldn't get himself to call her a friend. Give a little thought to how he would refer to her and how the narration represents that. What you have isn't necessarily wrong. I just want to make sure it's a conscious decision on your part rather than something that just fell out this way.

>Sky wondered//

You also had a recent "Sky wanted to ask." There are a class of verbs related to knowledge and perception, like see, hear, wonder, hope, want, wish, know that you need to be careful with. With an omniscient narrator, they're fine, but they're often unnecessary and actually distancing for a limited narrator. Like I said, a limited narrator is restricted to the knowledge and perceptions of the focus character. It works the other way, too: It's assumed the character knows or perceives anything the narrator says. So instead of saying Sky wonders this, just have the narration ask the question for him. Otherwise, the narrator is a middleman, another step forced between the reader and character that doesn't need to be there.

>to catch//

Extraneous space.

>place....” He trailed off//

One too many dots there, and an unnecessary narrated trailing off again. The four-dot ellipsis is more for formal writing, where you're including an excerpt from some cited material but not using the whole sentence.

>He scarcely know Celestia//

Typo.

>of a//

Extra space. I'd say you should do a Ctrl-f for two spaces, but since you double-space after sentences, it wouldn't help you root these out.

>What if that Princess Luna was gone forever?//

There you go. This is a lot more personal than phrasing it as "Sky wondered if Princess Luna was gone forever."

>ear's sleeking back in anger//

Why in the world do you have an apostrophe there?

>Sky was disturbed at the sight of her//

Then why doesn't his limited narration sound like he's disturbed? Any why don't I get to see what he does? You don't describe what about her makes him think this.

>and tear//

Extra space.

>clack//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration like this. Fortunately, this is a valid word anyway, so just don't give it any special formatting, and it'll be fine. This kind of effect really only works well in comedies or children's tales.

>What could he possibly tell them except that they should be terrified; but they would not be out here to begin with if they hadn't already set their fears aside.//

I haven't been commenting on it, but you use semicolons with conjunctions pretty frequently. It's not strictly wrong, but they're also pretty redundant in function. It's best to do this sparingly.

>spurn the trembling ground//

First, you really haven't established Sky as the poetic sort who would phrase things this way. And even if he would when given a chance to craft his words carefully, now is not that time. He's afraid he was about to witness six ponies' deaths, so eloquence isn't exactly a concern for him at the moment.

>He furrowed his brow in thought.//

You start the next three paragraphs with the same word.

>They all survived unharmed//

Why is he assuming this will be the only attempt against them?

>he hastened to add//

This would apply to the whole quote, but you only mean fr it to apply to the last sentence. You might want to break the quote up so it works that way.

>he gestured ahead, to where they had left Nightmare Moon.”//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>sighing in it's slow nocturnal rhythms//

Its/it's confusion.

>But of course the images in glass were too stylized to mean anything; the glass itself cut centuries after the last ponies to have stood in Luna's presence had died.//

Misused semicolon.What comes after it couldn't stand as an independent sentence.

>Nebula's distress was written on her face, obvious as a fireworks display.//

I just have to take the narrator's word for this. If it's so obvious, let me see it and judge for myself.

>you were created by what I am.”//

Don't include the quotation marks in the italics so that it matches the opening ones.

>alive, and//

Extra space.

>he heard Nightmare's voice//

I already commented on the wondering, but you also have him "hear" things a lot when it's already implicit he hears whatever the narrator describes. It's only worth pointing out like this when you're emphasizing that it's something difficult to notice or that he was specifically keeping watch for it.

>“How are you,” Sky asked//

So why don't you have a question mark?

>I've made a decision to believe in her, Sky.//

It's a bit much for her to use direct address for him twice in three sentences, all in the same paragraph. In fact, she's doing it quite a bit around here. Think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation. You don't even need it to help the reader decipher who's speaking to whom, since they're the only two there.

>Started by the sudden motion//

Did you mean "startled"?

This is a nice story with likable characters. There are all the repeated mechanical things I pointed out, and I wasn't exhaustive with those. The only stylistic thing was how often you relate emotions very bluntly. If you can tune those things up, I'd be happy to post it. Just resubmit when you're ready. I'll keep an eye out for it.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2265

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>tiny, closet//
Those are hierarchical adjectives in effect (the second is actually a noun adjunct). You don't need a comma between them.

Story:
>and— and//
Don't leave space around an em dash.

>they didn’t even seem phased//

fazed

>a,” Twilight looked down as tears stung the corners of her eyes, “a//

You're punctuating that like a speech tag, but there's no speaking action. It looks more like you're trying to do an aside. Here's how:
>a—” Twilight looked down as tears stung the corners of her eyes “—a
if she stops speaking for the aside's action or:
>a”—Twilight looked down as tears stung the corners of her eyes—“a
if she doesn't.

>Sugarcoat muttered something else under her breath.//

This implies a limited narrator in Twilight's perspective. If it were in Sugarcoat's viewpoint or omniscient, the narrator would know what she muttered and wouldn't have to leave it vague. Now, go to this sentence:
>Twilight looked up at Sugarcoat, eyebrow raised but tears still shimmering in the corners of her eyes.
The assumption will be that this is still in Twilight's perspective, since there's no evidence to the contrary. But how would Twilight know her own tears were shimmering? She can't see her own face.

>her voice dripped with venom, as though she was disgusted with herself for saying it.//

There's no speaking action in this attribution, and you should also really try to avoid spelling out her motive like this. Focus more on her actions and appearance, not what they mean. If you choose how to describe them carefully, the reader can deduce the meaning.

>Twilight shakes her head//

Why is this in present tense?

>“Y-yo-y-you l-li-like m-me?”//

Sugarcoat's been pretty physically aggressive so far. I can buy that Twilight's not socially developed enough to get what's going on until now, even though the reader will, but i's still odd that she doesn't seem surprised that Sugarcoat's actually talking to her, sharing personal thoughts, and invading her personal space. Twilight's only acted slightly touched by the attention and otherwise oblivious.

>most taken up by instruments and storage space//

Seems like "mostly" would work better there.

>a very persuasive girl confessing a long held crush//

Long-held. And how does she know that anyway? Sugarcoat hasn't said anything about how long she's had a crush. For that matter Sugarcoat only said she liked Twilight. Why is Twilight jumping over the possibility of a platonic meaning here? So far, there's no evidence of anything romantic.

She blushed to the point that Sugarcoat could easily mistake her natural color for red.//
That's not a good fit for Twilight's perspective again. She can't see her own face. How does she know it's red? She could deduce blushing from it feeling warm, but then she'd describe it in those terms.

>resignation drawn in her voice and on her face//

Paint a picture with this. Let me see that resignation on her face.

>um,” Twilight bit her lip nervously, “get//

Refer to my earlier comment on how to do a narrative aside in a quote. I won't mark any more of these.

>we can get to know each other better//

I have a feeling Sugarcoat already feels she knows Twilight fairly well just from observing her a lot. Otherwise, it'd be odd for her to call what she has a crush instead of just an attraction. But if she does think she knows Twilight, wouldn't she say so? It'd even add more background to justify her feelings if she mentioned a quick example or two that she watched Twilight do something that she found endearing and that revealed Twilight's personality to her. That's build a nice foundation for the romance.

>She wore a sad smile, as if Sugarcoat leaving meant the feelings were superficial.//

This wouldn't fit with Twilight's perspective, either. I'm not sure what perspective you're trying to use here. It's not overt enough to signify a clear shift to Sugarcoat's head. Are you trying to be omniscient?

>OK//

It's preferred to spell that out as "okay."

>she searched for something, anything to occupy their time with.//

That's expressing Twilight's internal thought process as if it's the narrator's, so this smack of being a limited narrator in Twilight's viewpoint again. The narrative voice could use some uniformity. The perspective wavers between the characters, and into an omniscient feel at times.

This card game's a nice little moment between them, but Twilight asked her to stay and talk. So why does she proceed to do something that doesn't involve talking or try to draw Sugarcoat into conversation as they play?

>in sea of people//

Missing word.

>friends—” Sugarcoat cringed “—or//

Well, there you go. You already knew how to do that. So just watch out for having non-speaking actions punctuated and capitalized as if they're speech tags.

>The school has a copy and the theater room//

Did you mean "in the theater room"? You're finally getting to what you've promised: talking. Twilight's starting to learn about her. But it keeps going in fits and starts, which shouldn't be what she wants, and she's the one derailing it. She asks Sugarcoat to stay and talk, but she suggests a card game they play in silence. She asks about Sugarcoat's favorite movie, then suggests rushing off to see it instead of continuing to learn about her. Her actions don't seem consistent with her stated motivation.

>You didn’t tell me you were cutting class!//

Didn't she? This is from earlier:
>Won’t we need to go to class soon?//
She didn't know Twilight had a free period, but she pretty much told Twilight she had to go to class. But if she's been paying that much attention to Twilight, wouldn't she know her schedule?

>The silver haired girl//

That doesn't quite fit the perspective either. An omniscient narrator might say something like this, or a limited narrator unfamiliar with her. But Twilight knows who she is. Why would she refer to Sugarcoat this way?

>Casablanca//

You correctly italicized the title earlier.

>Warner Brother’s//

The company name doesn't have an apostrophe. It's just plural.

>Twilight was again dragged by her hand from her seat and they practically sprinted down the hall to the stairs and took them two at a time until Sugarcoat yanked the door to the theater open and held it for Twilight.//

I haven't made a point of it so far, but there are a number of places you could use a comma between clauses. This one's particularly in need of one, what with all those "and"s floating around. It helps to keep them all organized.

>the fanfare was still going//

How loud is this? Nobody's going to notice them? Unless the current class period is really long, they'll still be there when a bunch of people are out in the hallway again.

>leaning against Twilight//

That's awfully forward again, especially since Twilight's already said it's a bit much to take in yet and she's not sure how she feels about it yet. So why does Sugarcoat think it's okay to do this? Why doesn't it surprise Twilight?

>Twilight found herself leaned against the top of Sugarcoat’s head//

Kind of an awkward phrasing with how you're using "leaned." I had to read it a couple times to parse it.

>Her hand was clasped in Sugar’s//

Again, this is at odds with how Twilight had described her thoughts on it. When did this change? Let me see it happen. Does she feel odd about it at first, but halfway through the movie, she feels Sugarcoat's fingers bump against hers? She doesn't reach for them, but she doesn't pull back either. Then she does grip them at a tense moment in the movie. Whatever. Some kind of developing action like that, so that it's not just suddenly there. That's provide a process, not just the result.

>a end//

Typo.

>Was this our first date?//

And that more gradual development would sell this better. It wouldn't just come out of nowhere. By the way, what made Sugarcoat think Twilight would be receptive to romance with a girl? I hope that's something that comes out as they talk (They will, right? At some point?).

>The unspoken rejection//

I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Is she interpreting what Sugarcoat said as assuming Twilight isn't interested, and she feels bad for Sugarcoat? It isn't clear.

>6//

Spell out numbers this short.

Aside from that abrupt jump from "I don't know what to make of this" to holding hands and giggling, this isn't a bad start at all. It's taking its time showing that the two have a real relationship developing instead of just assuming the reader will care. At least it seems to be heading in the right direction, but we still haven't seen that meeting of the minds, which is kind of odd, since Twilight specifically wanted to talk. Pretty soon, you'll need to show a little more about the emotional appeal here. Sugarcoat's done a pretty good job of explaining why she admires Twilight, though that's not precisely the same thing as falling in love with her. But on Twilight's side, I'm not getting anything from her beyond being flattered. When's that talk going to happen? Hopefully, soon, because without that, she has no basis for deciding this is someone she wants to date, who will be compatible with her. And given that the chapter's more or less been in Twilight's perspective, that's a curious omission. Sugarcoat's not exactly a stranger to her, so what thoughts are already occurring to her about this? What does she see in Sugarcoat? What makes her seem like a good fit as a potential friend, first, and for someone to date in addition?

On to chapter 2!

>She walked over the mirror//

Missing a word.

>however....//

Four dots are really for formal writing, where you're using an excerpt from another work. This type of conversational conceit is also indicative of a limited narrator, but you've been very factual and distanced in the narration. It's making me wonder whether you wanted a limited or omniscient narrator.

This description of Sugarcoat's outfit is pretty chock full of "to be" verbs. It helps keep the story's momentum up if you can phrase those with more active verbs.

>Bye Mom//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>10//

That's a short enough number to write out.

>Neither passenger could notice the whine of the electric motors over the stacking notes of Baroque composition.//

It's moments like this that your choice of narrator matters. If you have a limited narrator, then you can't tell me things the perspective character can't hear.

>While she hadn’t ventured this far into the city (except for her occasional “research” projects at Canterlot High), she quickly found a menu item that agreed with her.//

This section is pretty sterile. It's another spot where you're using a more conversational technique, so it would seem to fit a limited narrator better, but it's missing that personal voice that would bring this alive. What does she see on the menu? What things sound good to her? What does she consider for her choice? No garlic or onions to keep her breath fresh? No tomato sauce that might inadvertently leave a mark on Sugarcoat's cheek? Little details like that do so much to bring things to life. Does she watch Sugarcoat study her own menu? Does Sugarcoat catch her at it?

>reaching out her hand to grasp Sugarcoat’s//

Sugarcoat already put a hand on Twilight's, so what's she reaching with? Her other hand?

>she asked in a gravelly voice and almost aggressive tone//

If a character's going to say something in an unusual way, it's often better to describe that before the quote or during a break early in the quote. That way the reader knows how to hear it. Otherwise, he's already heard it and either accepts it as a sterile fact or has to reread it in the revised style.

>She reached her hand across the table.//

Again? You never had her pull her hand back, and possibly both of them were over there.

>It’s a bit of a story, if I’m honest.//

Is she making a joke here? I'm a little surprised Twilight doesn't comment on this, since they'd just been discussing it.

This is a refreshingly relaxed pace for a romance story, though Twilight does move rather quickly from "I don't know how I feel about this" to "let's hold hands and sneak kisses and go out to dinner." I'm glad they're finally going to talk and learn about each other, but it's odd that Twilight first suggested that right near the beginning of chapter 1, yet it's toward the end of chapter two (and the next day) before they actually do, which comes after some of the hand-holding and kiss-sneaking. Maybe Sugarcoat feels like she knows Twilight already, but wouldn't Twilight want to get to know Sugarcoat first? She really doesn't know much about her, and she's already catching herself thinking of her as a girlfriend? That part at least could use a more gradual build-up.

To chapter 3!

>Sugarcoat continued her story as their food arrived and they ate slowly.//

Things like this are so bland. It doesn't create a visual at all. Show me a little of what they do. It'd really bring the setting alive. Does Twilight take a sip of her water first? Does Sugarcoat take a sniff of her food? Do they tear off a piece of the complimentary bread? Add the little details that make it authentic. I won't go into it too much, but it's a technique John Garder discusses in his book The Art of Fiction that makes the reader more likely to believe the narrator, because if he knows all these things about what happened, it must be right.

>or things like//

You seem to be missing a word, or is that a legitimate phrasing? I've never heard it before.

>now that she’d finished//

That was quick. Why are you in such a hurry to have them finished? It's a good way to have little actions interspersed with their dialogue, and it's a little unbelievable that Sugarcoat only got a few paragraphs of dialogue in before they'd eaten everything.

>to not//

Swap the order of those.

>The bill arrived in the brief silence//

The waitress isn't going to ask if they want dessert, or if they're splitting the check or anything? You've been out to dinner enough that you know what happens. Give this all the little touches of realism.

>Sugarcoat nodded and grabbed her purse. She slung it over her shoulder and grabbed Twilight’s hand with her other, unoccupied hand. They turned and shared a warm smile.//

That's really what's hurting this part of the story: the narration gets pretty factual and bland, and it's relying almost exclusively on the dialogue to carry the emotion. I've remarked on perspective before, and that will determine how to go about this. If you want a limited narrator then let the wording and tone of the narration itself carry the emotion, as if streaming the character's internal thoughts. Or if you want an omniscient narration, the let the characters' behavior constantly demonstrate how they're feeling.

>20//

That's short enough to write out.

>Twilight always was prettiest when she didn’t care what anyone else thought and just expressed her true self. That, and she finally, maybe, had a girlfriend.//

Here, you're definitely taking a limited narration, and this part does a good job of having the narrator's tone express character emotion. Assuming you want a limited narrator, carry this feel through out the story.

>stand on her toes//

Why is this necessary? They appear to be almost exactly the same height.

>blanked with the white light and electricity//

>after what felt like an hour//
Given that you're already skirting cliche in the story's premise, you probably want to avoid exacerbating it by using cliched prashings like this.

>good night Sugarcoat//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>She kissed Twilight’s forehead as Twilight finished her cereal and headed out the door to the bus stop.//

That chronology doesn't make sense. Her mom kept kissing her through finishing her cereal and walking out the door?

>now they’d finished with the worksheet//

Seems like you're missing a "that."

There's an awful lot of blushing going on in this story. Besides getting repetitive, it also tends to undercut the seriousness to have it happen so much.

>Sour Sweet simpered//

That's a really unusual word, so it stands out very easily when repeated. I recall seeing you use it for Twilight's mother not long ago.

Hm. If you really want that ending, I can't make you change it. But I have to think it's a pretty bad idea to have a comic stinger ending on a story that had very little comedy in it. You want the end to bring thematic closure, not change the tone abruptly. You set all these conflicts up about whether their relationship would be expected and if they could maintain it after Twilight transferred (on that note, the last sentence doesn't quite make sense, since Twilight's not going to be around Sour Sweet). And take whatever was happening with Twilight's mom. When Twilight left for school, her mom started texting someone, and it sure felt like you were trying to foreshadow something, but it just gets dropped.

So my main points would be:

—Good job with the characters. Sugarcoat's dialogue in particular seems to suit her clipped, rapid style, and it's easy to hear it in her voice.
—The romance is taken at a reasonably slow pace, for the most part, but even when Twilight espouses such, she doesn't stick to it, like when she suggests they go somewhere to talk and get to know each other, but then doesn't pursue doing so at all. Her transition from surprise to reciprocation is quite rapid, even with her saying she's going to go through the process at a more sedate pace.
—The perspective needs some unity. That means deciding on whether you want an omniscient or limited narrator, then keeping to that format. The omiscient narrator shouldn't be expressing character opinions as his own or taking a conversational style, and the limited narrator need to check in pretty regularly with these kinds of subjective comments to keep it from slipping back into an omniscient feel. And watch how abruptly and often the character viewpoint switches back and forth between Twilight and Sugarcoat in the middle of scenes. Even if you go with omniscient, it could use some clearer expression of character emotions to keep the narration from getting too dull.
—The ending does not at all match the tone or theme of the story. It ought to put a little bow on the message you want the reader to take away, not break the serious tone to make a joke that's tangential at best.

There's nothing here that's too monumental to fix. The narrative issue will take going back through in detail to make sure you keep to whatever voicing you want, and that may be a little time-consuming. But it's not the kind of thing where yu have to reinvent the story and start from the ground up again. I like what I see; it just needs some good polish applied to it. If you can shape this up some, I'd be happy to post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2275

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>As Rarity prepares to open her flagship in Manehatten, tensions rise and a former antagonist returns...will the city’s cold disposition crush the mare’s spirit or will she rise above it?//
Flagship what? Text tends to format better on FiMFiction.net if you leave a space after an ellipsis (except for ones that begin a sentence), and it's pretty trite to ask a rhetorical question in a synopsis like this.

Story:
>that?//
When a word is italicized for emphasis, include a question mark or exclamation mark in the italics.

>lose — with//

You do put spaces around an en dash, but not an em dash.

>By the first snow, none would remain unturned.//

I assume you're talking about the leaves here. Why would that be the case? Because of windy weather, or bustling traffic? Something else? It's not clear.

>Treading cautiously across the road, she immersed herself in the glittering shop displays that lined the street.//

You're still on the safe side, but beware how many of those participial phrases you use. I've seen quite a few already, and they get repetitive easily, since they're uncommon in everyday speech and thus stand out. But here, note that they mean things happen at the same time. Yet that would be contradictory here. If she's immersed in the displays, she's not paying attention to anything else, so she couldn't be "treading cautiously."

>Tightening her scarf once more, her eyes wandered to the charming little building in front of her.//

And the more participial phrases you use, the more likely you'll run into their attendant problems. This one's a classic dangling participle. Rarity's tightening her scarf, but she's not in the sentence. You've said her eyes tightened her scarf.

>Taking the key from her saddlebags, she turned the brass knob and pushed.//

Another case of participles jumbling the chronology. Why take out the key unless the door is locked? And if it's locked, she can't open the door until she's used the key. Yet you have her doing both at the same time.

>The door’s rusty hinges creaked on the wooden frame//

Missing end punctuation.

>Withdrawing a notepad and pen from her bag, she scrawled out a to-do list.//

And again. These would happen one after the other, but you have them as simultaneous. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

>once shiny and polished state//

Technically, your phrasal descriptors should be hyphenated, but it's a compound one off the first word, so it'd properly look like:
once-shiny and -polished state
But that would probably look odd to most readers who aren't familiar with the mechanics of it. So you might want to avoid the issue by replacing "once" with something like "formerly."

>air – the//

I don't get the differentiation you're making between en dashes and em dashes. If you're going to use both, the pattern is en dashes for asides (little pieces of auxiliary information a narrator or speaker wants to wedge in) and em dashes for interruptions, cutoffs, or abrupt changes of direction.

>completely oblivious of the ponies that needed to weave out of her way.//

You're using a limited narrator, who states Rarity's thoughts and opinions on her behalf. So they should have the exact same knowledge and perception. If she's oblivious to these ponies, the narrator is, too, and can't notice them there.

>The mare immediately brightened.//

Now that Rarity knows who it is, why is she still referring to her as "the mare"?

>next flagship boutique//

I don't get this phrasing. Is she saying this boutique will become the new flagship store of her line? Because you can only have one flagship. "Next" would mean not only giving this one the status, but also removing that status from whichever one previously held the title. It's unclear that she actually wants to make this her main store.

>&//

Write it out as "and" unless it's actually a literal transcription of something from a logo or book, for example.

>important...it//

Leave a space after the ellipsis. The standard ways to do one are like... this, like ... this, or like . . . this. The first is the one that formats best with line breaks.

>She needed help, sure but//

Needs a paired comma after "sure."

>North Point,” Coco said, averting her gaze, “she doesn’t necessarily work in the fashion industry.//

The way that's punctuated, the assembled sentence would be:
North Point, she doesn’t necessarily work in the fashion industry.
It just feels odd to have that crammed together like that. I'd recommend starting a new sentence after "gaze."

>craftsmanship//

Craftsponyship? I dunno. Whatever.

>Rarity wove through the sea Manehattanites//

Missing word.

>Besides, even if she’s not. I can always decide not to hire her, it is my boutique after all.//

Seems like you wanted that period to be a comma. And then the comma after it is a splice.

>once promising//

Hyphenate.

>Craft & Decor store//

So is that the actual name of the store? If not, why is it capitalized? If so, the ampersand is fine, but why didn't you capitalize it earlier?

>Gee, I’m sorry, Rarity. I probably should’ve mentioned that they closed down. I’m sorry.//

Well, what did she think Rarity wanted to go there for? Why didn't Coco tell her this as soon as Rarity asked where it was? Coco's the one leading her there, so it shouldn't have come as a surprise to her. And why does Coco say "I'm sorry" twice?

>Coco rested a hoof on the mare’s shoulder.//

This is even worse than Rarity calling Coco "the mare" in her own limited narration. This is Rarity referring to herself as "the mare." That's just weird.

>cafe’s//

Why is that apostrophe there?

You have Rarity and Coco use direct address quite frequently. Think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation. They can help a reader keep straight who is speaking to whom, so you get some leeway there, except for everything that's happened so far, they've been the only ones speaking, so that's not even a reason here.

>Her eyes scanned the discolored photographs barely clinging to the faded, striped wallpaper//

Missing your end punctuation. And it's a little odd to attribute the action to her eyes. It's not like it's involuntary, and it undercuts any sort of motivation she might have to look at them or discounts what about them draws her attention.

>might of//

"Might have" or "might've." You make this mistake multiple times.

>relishing its nostalgic scent//

>Sliding herself into one of the booths sectioned against the left wall//
>eyeing her curiously//
>feeling her cheeks grow warm//
See how often you use these participial phrases sometimes? These are in consecutive narrative sentences.

>Her eyes turned to gaze upon the rugged and unshaven face of the barista.//

Again, by attributing the action to her eyes instead of Rarity, you remove her motivation for doing so.

>Rarity?... um, Rarity?//

I'm not sure how you envision her saying this, because there are multiple arrangements that are gramatically correct, but this one isn't.
Rarity...? Um, Rarity?
Rarity? ...Um, Rarity?
Rarity... um, Rarity?

>Miss//

As an isolated word, this doesn't bear capitalization. Under some circumstances it would, but only if attached to her name or implied that it was, like having an ellipsis follow, as if he were inviting her to finish. But he isn't based on how he says it again a little later.

>Stunned by the stallion’s bold question//

Instead of saying she's stunned, make her act stunned, or since you're using a limited narrator, have the narration sound like the thought process of someone who's stunned.

>she could feel the passionate warmth rise up into her cheekbones//

You seem to be going into Coco's perspective here. And the comma preceding this is a splice.

>Of course I do, darling!//

How many times are you going to have her say darling? It's not actually that frequent in the show.

>She did?//

Why does ths surprise Rarity?

>gala//

She seems to be referring to the Grand Galloping Gala, so it'd be capitalized.

>high profile//

As you've used it, hyphenate this.

>19th//

Spell that out.

>high scale//

Hyphenate.

>blueprints//

>blue-prints//
Note your inconsistent spellings.

>Now I better return to my office, there’s paperwork that needs filling out.//

Comma splice.

>“I’ll see you girls later.” North Point said//

Punctuation.

>slided//

slid

>thought still drifted in her thoughts//

You don't say...

>ain’t you//

Needs a comma.

>for awhile//

An adverb doesn't parse here. You actually need "a while" to be two words in this instance.

>She rose from her seat//

Pretty much the same phrasing you used when Coco left.

>side-ways//

sideways

>Maybe I’m just overthinking it, he’s probably just curious.//

Comma splice.

>It’s not the first time a stallion has been interested in me and it won’t be the last.//

Needs a comma.

>there’s no way we’ll stay business//

Missing word.

>He paused for a moment, his eyes looked around the empty room before falling on Rarity.//

Comma splice, and why do you keep making eyes have a mind of their own?

>I really wish I could help you, Chester, you of all ponies need it.//

Comma splice. I don't know why these keep popping up now when they didn't early in the story, but I'm going to stop marking them.

>eager looking//

Hyphenate.

>“Now, how much do I owe you?” she reached for her silk coin purse.//

You've capitalized that as if it were a speech tag, but there's no speaking action in it.

>The stallion took of his hat.//

Typo.

>He took off//

Pretty repetitive phrasing with the first sentence of the same paragraph.

>the foreclosure notice had arrived on her planned day of departure//

I have no idea what's happening. What foreclosure notice? What departure? When she left Ponyville? Or when she's planning on leaving Manehattan?

>lobbyist//

That's a really odd word choice. It has immediate political connotations.

>Madam//

That wouldn't be capitalized.

>the elevator came to a halt and its shiny reflective doors opened.//

>they arrived at room 12B and Bernard rustled around his belt for the correct key.//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>out onto the large balcony which extended out//

Watch that close word repetition.

>Thirty-five floors up, the bright lights of the sleepless city shone with all the beauty and restlessness of the stars.//

It sounds like you're saying the lights are 35 floors up.

>By turning the gold taps, she managed to find a suitable temperature.//

That makes it sound like it was a difficult process.

>Letting the warm water drizzle down her coat, all memory of the cold Autumn air soon disappeared from her mind.//

Another dangling participle. This says her memory let the warm water drizzle down her coat. And you're back to using a ton of participial phrases right around here.

>did not simply did not//

Extraneous words.

>let alone a stallion as handsome as him.//

Set this off with a comma, and technically, it's "as handsome as he."

>Boutique//

You haven't been capitalizing that.

>But, the letter had shattered that illusion.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>wet steam//

Is there any other kind?

>earnt//

I've never seen this as a valid past tense before.

>the doors chimed opened//

Something's jumbled there.

>East//

>West//
Why are these capitalized?

>To one side, was the bar//

No reason for that comma.

>in the middle was some round tables//

Number agreement.

>a elegant//

Typo.

So it should be clear what detailed problems there are. Basically, anything I pointed out multiple times, but also note that I wasn't exhaustive in marking things. I just did enough examples to give you the gist of what to look for.

So far, the plot seems fine, though we haven't gotten in far enough yet to see what Suri's motivation is. Character seems fine as well, for what we get, but the depth of some of these characters is pretty shallow. For North and Coco, they come in, recite their lines, and leave. None of their personality comes out while they're on stage, and they don't show much emotion beyond what little can be inferred from the dialogue.

It's also odd how often you give Rarity italicized thoughts when you already have a limited narrator who can state her thoughts for her. There are times it can work to do so, but as often as you use it, it makes me wonder if you thought you were using an omniscient narrator.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2281

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>all the ponies of the kingdom, giving them all//

Try to avoid close word repetition like that.

>and by the time the dust settled//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>the common pony, who toil the lands and survive by the sheer force of their will.//

"Who" would take the number of its antecedent, "pony," which is singular, but you have plural verbs and pronoun.

>mommy//

As a term of address, a family relation gets capitalized.

>Softly//

>soft//
Those are close enough together that it's fairly repetitive.

>so long as it does//

Needs a comma here. Be careful that you're putting them between clauses like this. Without one, it can make things confusing.

>"How would you know," Starlit sniped back, "you're always off on patrol when I'm at home with her."//

The assembled quote, if you removed the speech tag, would be a comma splice. It's even a very obtrusive one, since they'r different kinds of sentences. The first part is a question, and the second is a statement.

>There's so much to worry about in this world we live in; where our next meal will come from, how we'll prepare our daughter for the rigors of the outside world once she gets old enough to want to explore it, what we'll do when she is fully grown and gone.//

Misused semicolon. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence. It's just a list. You're clarifying something, so a colon would work, and a dash is pretty multipurpose.

>I've seen the things that fill this land and it doesn't give me a lot of confidence//

Needs a comma between these two clauses.

>far-gone//

In this usage, you don't need the hyphen.

>I see a daughter that//

You've done this a few times now. When you're talking about a sentient creature, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>"That's what I love about you, Starlit Sky," Stalwart said as he leaned into his wife's chest. "You always know how to one-up my pessimism with judicious optimism."//

You've got a mild problem of much of the dialogue sounding unnatural. It feels more scripted than spontaneous. Is this really the kind of word choice you'd expect to overhear someone at the next table in a restaurant using?

>Nights could get dreadfully cold in this part of the country, so it was better to be safe than sorry.//

You've had an omniscient-sounding narrator so far, but here, the narrator is expressing someone's opinion, both with the "dreadfully" and the "better safe than sorry." Yet I'm not sure which of these characters is supposed to be represented by it.

>Their small plot of land wasn't much to look at; a few rows of carrots and other root vegetables set into soil that had been nearly sucked dry of its nutrients.//

Another misused semicolon. I predict this will be a persistent problem.

>A lustrous blue light bounced off of her dusky indigo horn//

It's still early in the story, and I don't remember which character is which. In the previous paragraph, you only mention them as a group, and in the one before that, you only use pronouns. I have to go back three paragraphs to see this refers to Starlit. It's probably a good idea to use her name here.

>let it be known that I will not take it laying down//

Lay/lie confusion, and another spot where the language sounds anything but spontaneous. Has she practiced this line in case this scenario occurred?

>if I wanted to rob you then you wouldn't have been roused from your slumber//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Go back from wherever it is you came from stranger//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>if this mare wanted harm to befall her it was going to whether or not she fought back//

Needs a comma between these clauses.

>voice heavy with condescension//

Try to avoid having the narrator draw conclusions for me. Give me the evidence and let me make my own judgment.

>dotty old beggar//

She's already felt intimidated by this character and knows she crossed the wards. So she's already going to write her off as a beggar she can dismiss out of hand?

>If you wish to insult my intelligence then please do so verbally//

Needs a comma.

>thrown off balance by the stranger's apparent telepathy//

Again, you're far too bluntly spelling out her emotional state. It's more engaging to demonstrate this through her behavior.

>Just a pony who remembers happier times; times//

Another misused semicolon. I don't think I've seen a correct one yet.

>Acting against her better judgement//

You'll most often set off participial phrases with a comma.

>The bouncing light//

You just said in the previous paragraph that it bounced.

>enrapturing it with visions and scenes of a most terrible sort//

And yet all this narration about it is very calm and formal. If you really want to use a limited narrator, the point of it is that we're getting her stream of thoughts. She essentially is the narrator, and if she's going to deliver these lines with all the excitement of waiting at the post office, it really undercuts how seriously she, and as a result I, takes it.

>burnt out//

In this usage, hyphenate.

>kingdom//

Well, if they're all princesses, then wouldn't that make it a principality?

>Before Starlit could give a response the stranger was off//

Needs a comma between the clauses. Now, to the rest of this paragraph. You haven't been using a ton of "to be" verbs in the story so far, which is good, since they're inherently boring. But you have a cluster of them that's killing the story's momentum. You have 7 of them in this one paragraph, 6 instances of "was" alone.

>No power like that could possibly exist, it just doesn't make sense!//

Comma splice.

>aren't you Starlit Sky," the stranger asked//

If she asked it, why isn't there a question mark? And without the comma for direct address, she's questioning Starlit's identity.

>other pony's thoughts//

You're mixing plural/singular here.

>a mare who I have a very tenuous relationship with//

Technically "whom," or better yet:
a mare with whom I have a very tenuous relationship
But it's up to you whether she'd know that, since it's dialogue.

>given the state of the world//

Another participial phrase that needs to be set off with a comma.

>you didn't let this world break you, you simply stared it in the face and dared it to blink first.//

Comma splice. Though I will say the semicolon before this is the only one in the chapter that's used correctly. I haven't marked them all.

>Were it not for White Eclipse//

Another spot where you need a comma to separate clauses.

>daughter." Starlit interjected.//

Punctuation.

>and from the outside she could tell that the interior was hollowed out to make for ample living space//

Set off this clause with a comma.

>partly from guilt and partly from empathy//

When you just tell me how to perceive a character, it loses most of its meaning. When I have to figure it out from the cues you provide, it gets me in touch with that character.

>it was an impotent sadness; it had no real weight or investment//

Hey, another semicolon that's used right.

>... I'm//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis. And it's not the best place fo one anyway, since you're not picking up from an earlier suspended sentence, and this isn't just becoming audible.

>pulled back midnight blue//

Each pair should be hyphenated, since they're each serving as a single adjective, and you need a comma between the two since thay're coordinate adjectives. They describe the same aspect, appearance.

>What Starlit noticed the most, however, were her eyes; her eyes were a deep violet//

And another semicolon used right. But it's still been quicker to point out the right ones than the wrong. Looks like the rest are fine from this point on, but none of the early ones are.

>"My name is Twilight Sparkle," she said with head held high, "The Wise Princess//

You've incorrectly capitalized the second part of the quote, given how you punctuated the speech tag.

Most of the problems here are pretty quick mechanical fixes, plus I've found the vast majority of them for you and told you what to do with them. So the only other things are the occasional really blunt emotional information and a few perspective oddities, plus the unnatural dialogue the pooped up once or twice. I'd only have to spot-check things, so it won't need a full re-read. You can mark it as "back from Mars" when you're ready to resubmit. It's a good setup so far, and I look forward to seeing it come back so I can post it.

JKinsley-forgot-her-tropeCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2285

>>2265
Is it normal procedure for you to post this and wait the better part of a week to send the email?

As far as actual feedback goes, this story (according to you) needs some work on developing Twilight's motivations, a more consistently involved narrator offering more emotional commentary, and you aren't a fan of the ending.

Focusing more on Sugarcoat's character than on Twilight's (at the expense of Twilight) was a choice made early on to develop Sugarcoat. I'm certainly not opposed to adding more detail about Twilight's thoughts and feelings; I simply focused on a more pressing issue at the time.

For the narration, I can see about adding more personality there. At the beginning of chapter three, I also made a deliberate choice not to interrupt Sugarcoat's story. I feel that it would lose too much of its weight if the narration is anything but character reactions. Having said that, I can explore options to add some reactions.

And forgive my pettiness:
>Why is this necessary? They appear to be almost exactly the same height.
Because Sugarcoat is wearing heels and Twilight is not. They would be the same height normally, but skipping details (mentioned twice, no less) and being confused about it later is not my fault.

The ending (and Ms. Velvet's texting) is meant as a sequel hook. I've tossed around the idea of a kind of epilogue that addresses some of that. Regardless, the ending stays.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2286

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>noting birdsong emanating from outside her window//

See how close in phrasing and construction this is to the first sentence in the previous paragraph?

>decijoules//

Why would she pick an odd unit like that? The percent efficiency would be the same no matter what units she used, so why pick those? Plain old joules would work fine. But it's even odd to refer to it in terms of units, since that's not the actual process going on. The units describe energy, which is really the point here.

>...and the pancakes are ready!//

He's not picking up an earlier suspended sentence, so capitalize that.

>sitting across from her and shoveling his own serving of pancakes into his fuel intake//

Beware that participles mean things happen at the same time. You have him putting her pancakes on her plate, sitting down, and eating, all simultaneously. They'd more likely happen in sequence.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first.

>to ease to burden//

Typo.

>who caught it in her electromagic glow//

Set off this dependent clause with a comma.

>“Applejack did,” Sweetie promptly replied, presenting the apple, “she thought you might like this, sister.”//

The way you capitalized/punctuated that, the quotes would join into a single sentence, but it would be a comma splice. And family relations get capitalized when used as terms of address. You got it right earlier with "Father." This occurs multiple times.

>Her sister’s words could cut deeper than any laser.//

I'm not sure what you intend that to mean. Sweetie has been nothing but analytic and formal, yet this really means an emotional impact, unless she's just evaluating a harsh tone or something.

>Twilight blinked.//

It's a tad visually repetitive that you've started three straight paragraphs with the same word.

>Rarity said in a sultry voice as she leaned into Spike//

The deeper you get into this conversation, the more you fall away from having Sweetie as your perspective character. I'm not sure the wording fits her viewpoint for a lot of this, as it's not the kind of judgments she's been making.

Why is Rarity flirting with Spike? She's only done so in canon when she wants something from him or she thinks he's being cute. I don't see her motivation here.

>giving a half-lidded gaze at Doctor//

Now she's going to flirt with every male?

>“Well, it’s probably just a hydraulic fluid buildup,” Doctor said without looking away, “just supercool a scalpel and drain the fluid.//

Another spot where the assembled quote would be a comma splice.

>baseball size//

baseball-sized

>Lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>I don’t want you to see this and it’ll buy us some time.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. This is an intermittent problem.

>They would never do that, they’ve spent too much money on it!//

Comma splice.

>“Oh no, it’s very popular at school,” Rarity said with teeth clenched, “they say they can hardly tell the difference.”//

The quote is a comma splice.

>“I’m not sure why you didn’t”//

Missing your end punctuation.

>hold on a moment.” Doctor held//

Watch that repetition.

>of...uncanny//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>S-so… her calling me ‘sister’ wasn’t some insult you programmed in, she was trying to reach out to me.//

Comma splice.

>Rarity sniffed at it struck her like a bolt of lightning//

Two typos.

>“What’s an acceptable fuel source?”

>
>“Anything biological will do!”
On the first one, the opening quotes weren't included in the italics.

>She recalled the time Sweetie Belle disowned her and Rarity won back her favor. She remembered how infuriated she was with Sweetie when she stole her gold fabric to make those dumb capes.//

This is really the crux of the story. nd it's not landing with me. There are two reasons why. First, Rarity makes a really quick about-face in her attitude toward Sweetie. She doesn't seem to struggle with it, and it's such a rapid mood change of a long-held belief that it's going to have trouble feeling authentic. Second, this excerpt is worded as so bland. Now, you absolutely have the right idea by appealing to anecdotes. That's a great way to establish an emotional context between two characters. But you've moved into a limited narration in Rarity's perspective for this scene, so this is essentially her own internal thought process here, and it comes across as so factual and cold that it's distanced from the emotion it's supposed to convey. How do these memories make her feel? Get at those feeling through how this is worded (essentially, give it the same inflections and tone you would to dialogue if she were saying this out loud). What sorts of physical sensations do the memories cause in her?

>And, she remembered//

It's rare that a comma after a conjunction is used correctly. This one isn't.

>Her heart stung as she saw Sweetie Belle get atomized//

This is the key emotion for the entire story: her attachment to her real sister and resentment that this robot is attempting to replace her. And all we get about it is that "her heart stung." Elaborate on this. Show me her pain, use word choices that reflect her turmoil. This story should be right up my alley. I love sad stories, I love sisterly bonding, I love Rarity and Sweetie Belle, and yet this story isn't moving me. This is why. I'm not making an emotional connection with Rarity or Sweetie Belle, because their emotions are only being dealt with in a very factual way.

>as she grasped it//

What's the antecedent here? "It" seems to refer to the blade or Rarity's hair. I guess you mean the sandwich? It was mentioned quite long ago to make for a reasonable antecedent, and last I knew, Doctor was still looking for it. When did it make its appearance? Wait, it was her hair? This is kind of confusing. Maybe if you mention that hair is a viable fuel, it would be clearer.

>All systems at full functionality//

Missing your end punctuation.

>The three of the hunched//

Typo.

>as they fought over the robot cancer as she walked over to the table//

Pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in a row like this.

>Jeez, what happened when I was out?//

I don't get why Sweetie no longer sounds like compu-speak. She just sounds like a normal pony now, but nobody's reacting to it as if it's unexpected. But nobody reacted as if her prior mode was unexpected, either, so something doesn't add up.

>who I still love//

whom

Okay, that was a really weird ending line. I don't know whether Rarity's concerned about it, and it brings no thematic or plot closure to the story. I know it can be difficult to write a last sentence, but this isn't accomplishing anything to wrap up the story. It's just an irrelevant, weak joke.

Other than that, you have a nice story arc. I noted how the climax came across as quite dull and rapid, so if you can create more investment there and come up with a way to draw a real conclusion with the ending, I'd be happy to post this. I'd only need to check those two spots, not make a full re-read, so you can mark it as "back from Mars."
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2287

>>2285
>Is it normal procedure for you to post this and wait the better part of a week to send the email?
Yes. Responses go through the fanfiction email box, which I have no control over. I post the review when I write it, and it can take a while before one of the ficbox people forwards the email response. A week's pretty extreme, but a few days isn't unusual.

>Focusing more on Sugarcoat's character than on Twilight's (at the expense of Twilight) was a choice made early on to develop Sugarcoat.

That's fine, but it doesn't absolve you of having a realistic character arc for Twilight. Sugarcoat can get top billing, but if Twilight's just going to have this instantaneous and convenient reciprocation, it doesn't do much to stand out above all the other insta-shipping stories that populate FiMFiction. And what's even more curious is that Twilight herself is the one to suggest a more gradual getting-to-know-you process, which she doesn't follow through on. It's also curious that you say you want to adhere to Sugarcoat's development so strongly, yet you're attached to an ending that has nothing to do with that.

>Because Sugarcoat is wearing heels and Twilight is not.

That was mentioned quite some time before. I think it'd be easy to throw a few words in there to say that's why, and it's probably not a good idea to rely on the reader remembering a small detail that you never did anything to emphasize height before (like having Twilight notice at some point that she has to look up to Sugarcoat's eyes, for instance). Both previous mentions were only about how Twilight was surprised Sugarcoat could move that quickly in heels, so it made an entirely different focus. If you think I'm unobservant and most readers would catch that, then so be it. It's not going to be the tipping point for your story.
This post was edited by its author on .

JKinsleyCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2291

>>2287
Fair enough. I wouldn't call 5 "a few" but that's beside the point.

>but it doesn't absolve you of having a realistic character arc for Twilight

I wasn't saying it did. I explained why I made the choices I did and that I would be willing to work on corrections.

> attached to an ending that has nothing to do with that

Because perhaps I have other goals in mind with that ending? This story may be complete in the sense that I'm done writing it, but I want it to begin a series. I said as much.

>never did anything to emphasize height before

I did, and it still goes to show that you might not have read the story as well as you think you have. Twilight stands on her toes to kiss Sugarcoat's cheek in the middle of chapter two.

You've made some good suggestions about ways to improve the story. I'm just saying that I know my story well enough to know that not all of those suggestions are warranted or what I want to do.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2295

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Tall for a unicorn, but with a slender physique, his steady gaze meant business.//

His gaze is tall with a slender physique?

>shards (Crystal bits) worth//

Those should be possessives, not just plurals.

>ninety-seven year old//

Hyphenate all that. It's being used as a single adjective.

>Mortal?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>with it’s sheer power//

Its/it's confusion.

>pull actively help to pull//

Something's jumbled in there.

>In this case, the spell wouldn’t have taken a long time to cast anyway; there weren’t any complicated pieces of magic to assemble; only brute force.//

The second semicolon is misused. If you replaced it with a period, what comes after it wouldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>usually wore up//

worn

>seven pointed//

>much needed//
Hyphenate.

>Counting out two hundred shards worth of the little gems, I pressed the money toward her.//

Note that participial phrases make things happen at the same time, but these would more likely be one after the other.

>Hoping to change our topic away from that unfortunate area of conversation//

You're doing a pretty good job of implying emotion instead of spelling it out for the reader, but the same should go for character motivations.

>The Between is the magical counterpart to our physical world; a place comprised of pure mana.//

Another misused semicolon. If you're defining, clarifying, or listing examples, a colon is fine, and a dash can work, too. For that matter, you're using a lot of semicolons, even where they're used correctly. You don't see a lot of them in everyday language, so they stand out easily. You want the reader remembering the story's events, not the fact that he saw a lot of semicolons.

>He didn’t answer me; at least, not at first.//

Suffice it to say you need to review your semicolon usage.

>Physically?//

Italicize the question mark.

>one-hundred//

That's not a hyphenated term.

>"Oh!"//

You'd been using fancy-style quotation marks until now, but here you've switched to simple ones. It keeps up that way for a while.

>spinal stave//

Why have you switched to this term? That's generally only used as a plural term.

>I will allow it to trod//

That doesn't parse. You're using the past-tense form in an infinitive.

>“Typical, Coil.”//

Missing a line break here.

>laying in my bed//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Yakistan//

Assuming you're using the canon country, isn't it Yakyakistan?

>we made a point never to discuss this point//

Fairly repetitive.

>Forgive me for showing my narrative hoof.//

I can't really square away how he's telling this story. Of course, he can write it however he likes, but unless he's recording it right when the described events happen, he's not going to remember entire conversations well enough to present them as quoted dialogue or small details of the setting. So he'd seem to be misrepresenting the accuracy of such things, as it's only his recollection of them. Still, he might write it any way he likes, but when he's so up front about this being a written narrative, I don't know why he'd want to obfuscate that.

>betraying irritation//

You've already got her performing a behavior that would connote this. You don't trust your reader to figure it out? You don't want to hit him over the head with this. You can add a bit more body language if you want it to be even clearer, but it's only in fleeting, unimportant moments that you should ever resort to spelling it out for the reader.

>his signature stave//

There you go again. You usually use "staff." Why do you mix this in from time to time? It's not that it's used improperly, but it's a tad confusing in that more people will recognize it as close to the plural form. It's similar to when I'll advise authors against using an obscure definition for a common word. It may sound odd to the reader, or he may misunderstand it.

>your majesty//

Honorific phrases like this get capitalized. Same for all the later times you use it.

>the only other mage of Star Swirl the Bearded’s caliber in the world//

Since this appositive is attached to Jade, it tends to describe her.

>Be patient. Almost there.//

This is just odd again from the standpoint of a storytelling mechanic. This is the kind of thing he'd say to someone if he were telling the story in person, but he's ostensibly writing it. Not that it's impossible for him to write this, but people rarely do, especially when they're going through the formalism of compiling it into a book. I don't know what purpose he thinks this tone is accomplishing, and it's a tone taken often enough in fanfiction to make the character seem edgy, but it also detracts from the authenticity of Coil seeming like a real person. It's not the kind of thing I'd make you change, but just be aware that it hurts the character's realism and thus the reader's connection to him. If he's trying to faithfully reproduce his own dialogue that takes such a tone, that'd be reasonable, but the narration as well? It doesn't feel consistent with someone of his education.

>witness’ stand//

That's not a possessive term.

>punch line//

punchline

>twenty-five foot deep//

You're using the whole phrase as a descriptor. Hyphenate all of it.

>just summarized, we stepped into a chamber just//

Watch that close repetition. This is a word many authors tend to overuse anyway.

>foul smelling//

Hyphenate.

>I think I smiled back at him.//

See, this is also working against the storytelling mechanic. He can't remember what he did here, but he can perfectly remember every word of entire conversations? That's not very consistent.

>once we figured out that it’s intelligence made it about as useful a servant//

Its/it's confusion.

>No, I didn’t really say that, but for want of a perfect memory of my exact words, I figure it must have been close enough//

At least you're admitting it, but again, it's for a single line that I'd think he has a far greater chance of remembering than all the mundane stuff he's written as if it's accurate.

>a body stripped of it’s soul//

You've got to learn the difference between those. Possessive pronouns (like my, his, your) never have apostrophes. "It's" is a contraction for "it is" or "it has."

>looked square at Silhouette//

squarely

>“You’re disgusting, Silhouette”//

Missing end punctuation.

>given the rumors I’d heard about how she dealt with her enemies//

Set off most participial phrases with a comma.

>pop//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration. This is a valid word anyway, so you just don't need any fancy formatting like italics or asterisks.

>most ponies lists//

Missing apostrophe.

>Mortal betrayed Wintershimmer, and murdered him in cold blood//

Mortal performs both verbs, so you don't need the comma.

>Jade looked at me with malice.//

And what does this look like? It's far more engaging when I get to judge for myself instead of having to accept the narrator's conclusion.

>way’s//

Why is this a possessive?

>dozen fold//

That'd be one word.

>balled up//

Hyphenate.

>everwhite caps. Of course, ‘ever white’//

Note your inconsistent spelling.

>poorly-chosen//

This is the exception: two-word descriptors starting in an -ly adverb don't take a hyphen.

>less than memorable//

Hyphenate.

>archmagi//

Why are you using that as the plural when you're not using "archmagus" as the singular?

>hadn’t died of old-age or disease//

Why is that hyphen there?

>mage(and//

Needs a space.

>Oh, I quite disagree, Master.//

You're inconsistent as to whether he capitalizes "master."

>“Right… Look,” I pointed my horn over to Wintershimmer’s spellbook, resting at my side.//

You've punctuated that like it's a dialogue attribution, but you have no speaking verb.

>“No!” He shouted//

Capitalization of the dialogue tag. There was an issue with GDocs forcing this recently, so if it's not the kind of error you normally make, that might be why. But it's worth sweeping the story to make sure there aren't any others. The GDocs issue mostly happened when dialogue ended in a question mark or exclamation mark.

>But at times, even an expert had to refer to the Pale Master.//

It creates an odd effect to have two consecutive clauses (or sentences) start with "but," since it implies the second should somehow contradict the first. That's not what you're going for here, though.

>away from my poor choice in titling//

He hasn't published the book as of writing his chapter. If he doesn't like its title, he can simply rename it. I don't get why this is a problem. It's just not presented as plausible.

>M— Wintershimmer.//

Don't put space around an em dash.

>whatever-else//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>‘s//

Capitalize. And the apostrophe is backward. Smart quotes always do this for leading apostrophes. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. I see more of these later on.

>Graargh//

You don't always spell that the same. Is that intentional?

>history of the Crystal Union wasn’t lost on me, but I pushed down recollections of history//

Watch that close repetition.

>one a them//

>one o’ the pirates//
Why spell the same thing different ways?

>o’ ‘em//

People don't elide when it means making a glottal stop. Try saying this out loud. It's really awkward.

>back when//

There's an extra space in there.

>‘ya//

Exactly what missing letters is the apostrophe supposed to stand for?

Okay, the description of the drink is a bit much. You know which one. We try to appeal to a general audience, so more of a PG rating. And this is heading a little too far over that line to be comfortable.

>Crystal’s//

I can't figure out why an apostrophe is there.

>dimly-lit//

No hyphen here.

>that would be an accented ‘somewhere’.//

You don't need end punctuation with how you've constructed this.

Hold on... with as much of a big deal as they made of Graargh eating meat, why does this drink have an oyster in it? You can't have it both ways.

So it should be obvious what the mechanical issues are. I just pointed out some examples, not every instance, or I would have been at this for a solid week. Apply those to the whole story.

Next is the storytelling method. I still don't get why the narration is as snarky as the dialogue is. It's a tough sell for someone who's highly educated and is going through the formal process of writing a book about it. If it were a normal narrative and the writing mirrored his thought process, it'd be more plausible, but that's more because speech and thought aren't as calculated. Putting it down in writing like this is extremely deliberate, and he's already noted that most ponies don't relate to him very well. Coming across the same way in writing isn't gong to turn out any better. Who exactly does he think his audience will be? Who would want to publish this?

He might anyway, and it's more the question of how this ever got published than why he would have written it this way. It's fine to write a character the reader doesn't like. It can be very effective at times, but it can also be lazy to pull out a very tired stereotype like the edgy, snarky guy you have here. I can live with it, because the plot and humor are pretty good, but I think you're cheating yourself out of having something unique by opting for another one of these dime-a-dozen archetypes.

He's playing the narration both ways, though. And that's the danger of using a written record as the medium for delivering the story. He's self-aware at times about not being able to remember things well or referencing the story itself, but he's not going to be able to remember the level of detail, like entire verbatim conversations, that he includes. And maybe addressing that is as simple as having him say up front that he's going to reconstruct events as accurately as he can, though he might be subject to filling in blanks, speculation, and outright fabrications. That way, you lampshade the whole thing.

Obviously, neither of us wants to have me take on the time-consuming task of going through the whole story in excruciating detail a second time, so I'm only going to spot-check it when you resubmit. As such, you can mark it as "back from Mars."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2296

>>2291
>I wouldn't call 5 "a few" but that's beside the point.
The review was posted on June 2, and ficbox forwarded out the email on June 6, so I count 4 days. A few is 3 or 4, I guess. That's pretty typical. Back when we had a huge staff and got 20 stories submitted daily, someone would clear out the mailbox several times a day, but now they usually let it go until enough mail has accumulated to make it worth their while. And that's been running about three days for the last year or more.

>Because perhaps I have other goals in mind with that ending? This story may be complete in the sense that I'm done writing it, but I want it to begin a series. I said as much.

You still need to have the story feel like it's complete. It's a tricky business to feel like there's a completeness here while starting up something new. This wouldn't be a problem if you were just going to add chapters to this story, since it wouldn't have to feel complete. But if you want this to be a discrete story in a series, then it does need to be self-contained. And that means having some conflict get resolved or some character growth—something that gets accomplished by story's end.

There are two things going on: Twilight's trying to manage how to respond to Sugarcoat, and Sugarcoat is struggling with revealing the kinds of feelings that have caused her problems before. On Twilight's side, we never really see her having any difficulty dealing with it, aside from a little parental embarrassment. She's been pretty static, though she's the one poised to show growth as the primary viewpoint character. On Sugarcoat's side, we can presume that she's happy things are turning out well for her for a change, but there's never a moment that she seems to have cleared a hurdle, like she's worked through the pain of her past and risen above it. All that's changed is that she's gotten the girl, but it's not apparent that there's anything fundamental that's changed about her character or her outlook as a result. And it seems like that's really the avenue you were trying to explore here.

So draw a conclusion from it. Not necessarily a permanent one, if you still want to leave it up in the air as to whether they can remain together, but that she's overcome some obstacle, accomplished something, and is a different person as a result.

So that's where the ending comes in. It doesn't really come to a conclusion, just seemingly throws in a random joke. Look at it from the reader's standpoint. You've introduced a new source of conflict, but you haven't defined what you'll do with that. For all the reader knows, this is the end of the line, and a last-minute source of unresolved conflict, particularly with no stakes attached, is just frustrating.

So, what to do about that? Letting the reader know this isn't the end would help a little. Is it as easy as stating in the synopsis or an author's note that you intend to continue this in another story? Probably. But give this new conflict some meaning: the stakes I mentioned. It just gets tossed in without any context as to how it's going to affect anything. Is Twilight flattered by the additional attention from Sour? Does she feel like she missed the obvious signs of interest from her, and now that she thinks about it, lots of people might have been flirting with her all along? Does she feel like maybe she could do better than Sugarcoat now? Is this going to lead into even more people admitting crushes on Twilight, an with at least one more girl admitting to liking other girls, would this make Sugarcoat even more confident that she could find someone else? Perhaps she found Twilight so attractive because of a lack of options, but now she might be re-evaluating that. Even if Twilight's perfectly happy staying with Sugarcoat, does Sugarcoat worry that this is the direction Twilight's thoughts have taken? Does she think she might lose Twilight?

Not that you'd have to answer all those questions. I bet you've already mulled over some of them before, and it'd easily take another story to answer them. But that's the point: you don't have to answer them, but you ought to at least start asking a few of them so this plot twist becomes relevant to the themes you've been developing and creates investment for the characters involved instead of just sitting there doing nothing. As it is now, the first sentence of the next story could be that Twilight politely turns Sour down, and she and Sugarcoat live happily ever after. It wouldn't be out of place with what's happened so far, but you don't want it so that the whole conflict can be disarmed so easily. So if you start creating that investment now, you make it so that the characters will have to work through resolving the situation in the following chapter/story. Thus it's not something that can just go away so easily, and you have momentum carrying out of this story and into the next.

>Twilight stands on her toes to kiss Sugarcoat's cheek in the middle of chapter two.

That's just another instance of the same. Both times Twilight has to stand on her toes, it isn't mentioned why. And when I did a Ctrl-f on "heel" through all chapters, the only references were to how well Sugarcoat could run or maneuver in them. Draw a direct connection between the two at some point, and it works fine. Otherwise, it feels like a bit of a disconnect (you could even make the case that Sugarcoat is simply taller, if you said so somewhere—it's a bit ridiculous that almost all the EqG characters are the exact same height, and I've even seen canon images that could support either Twilight or Sugarcoat being slightly taller, so you can take some license, as long as you say so).

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2300

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>"eep!",//

If you already have end punctuation for the quote, you don't add a comma.

>Fluttershy jumped up in alarm//

It's best to avoid these "in/with/of mood" phrases for two reasons. One, like with adverbs, they feed the reader a conclusion about the character's emotions instead of getting the reader to deduce them from the character's behavior and appearance. It creates a far less vivid visual image. And two, this particular kind of phrase is almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence anyway. Here, you have her jumping, sending her sheets flying, and saying something consistent with being alarmed. It's already apparent. You don't need to say so.

>Several seconds past//

Past/passed confusion.

>a small sigh of relief//

Another one of those "in/with/of mood" phrases. Keep an eye out for these.

>See Fluttershy it is all in your head//

Missing a couple of commas for direct address.

>and her eyes settled on a small basket beside her bed, the likes of which contained a white rabbit.//

"The likes of which" means you're referring to a similar but different one, yet that's not what you mean here.

>"Angel, I think there's something down stairs." She said weakly//

Downstairs, and your dialogue mechanics are off. When a speech tag follows the dialogue, you replace the period with a comma (other end punctuation would remain as is), and the speech tag doesn't get capitalized, since it's still the same sentence. There's a brief guide to dialogue punctuation and capitalization at the top of this thread.

>rabbit roll of over//

Extraneous word.

>raising a hoof to her mouth and biting it nervously//

"Nervously" is one of those adverbs I warned you about earlier. Beware those words ending in -ly, since they also make a conclusion for me instead of getting me to figure her out. Biting on her hoof already paints a picture of her as nervous. If I were a witness standing there, that's all I'd see, so it comes across as more natural that way.

>But, she couldn't just leave whatever it was down there.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>What about her animals friends?//

Now you're starting to have a perspective problem. You're having the narrator deliver her thoughts as if his own. That's fine, but consider that it makes Fluttershy herself essentially the narrator. So when you refer to Fluttershy as "the pegasus," it implies that this is how she's describing herself in her own thoughts, which is weird.

>That idea didn't soften her worries in the slightest, in fact it greatly enhanced them.//

This is blunt emotional information again. Instead of telling me she's worried, make her act worried, and make the narration (her thoughts, essentially) sound worried.

>Creeping down, each squeaking hoofstep on the floorboards made her wince//

This is a dangling participle. "Creeping down" is supposed to describe Fluttershy, but she doesn't appear in the sentence. This says her hoofsteps crept down.

>too much to bare//

bear

>Darkness covered most of the scene, the only light was that of the moon streaming in through the window.//

Comma splice.

>"See Fluttershy just your..." She began, then pause.//

Direct address commas again, plus the speech tag capitalization, and the "then pause" doesn't quite parse.

>she saw it was indeed wide open//

Here's another thing about the limited narrator you're using. It's in Fluttershy's head, so they have the same experience. Neither can know or perceive anything the other can't. So it's already implied that Fluttershy can see anything the narrator describes. It's only worth pointing it out if you're emphasizing that it's something she was specifically on the lookout for, or something most ponies wouldn't notice. Just say it was wide open. You don't need to say she saw it.

>"Hello... I'm...".//

You have an extraneous period outside the quotes.

>coking her head//

Typo. At least I hope so (we don't allow drug references).

>There was another experience to//

too/to confusion.

>it was not only herself that appeared to be terrified//

How does she know that she appears terrified? She can't see herself.

>"Urm... Hello"//

Missing punctuation.

>the filly's look turned from fear to mild confusion//

Let me see what it looks like.

>yet the look was completely undermined by the fact she clearly knew she was wrong//

How does Fluttershy figure this out? As worded, she's reading the filly's mind.

>Fluttershy glanced between her, and the kitchen in confusion.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>freighted//

Typo.

>while she new foals were quite different//

Typo.

>this situation didn't seem to far flung//

Too/to confusion again.

>Those glinting fangs making Fluttershy shiver a little as they flashed into view.//

You haven't really been making a habit of using fragments like this, so it makes it sound more like the verb form here is a typo.

>maybe herself and Moonlight had more in common than an initial fear of one another//

Reflexive pronouns only work in the objective case, and even then, only when the subject is the same person or thing. Just use "she and Moonlight" here.

>hidden cupboard on the far side.

>
> "I keep most of it hidden//
Watch the close word repetition.

>fruit filled//

Phrases like this, where the whole thing is essentially acting as a single adjective, usually get hyphenated.

>in disbelieve//

Typo, though it's another one of those phrases you should be avoiding.

>Fluttershy recognise her mistake//

The verb form is off.

> "I don't have anypony else, they're... They're all gone. I've been all alone for a long time"//

This is really sudden. It's also really common. I can forgive you for not knowing what pops up all the time in this fandom, but this is a very formulaic setup we see all the time, and it's going to make it tough for your story to stand out above the rest. One thing you can do, besides making this a more gradual reveal, is to add the kind of detail that makes it ring true more. Think about if you were this filly. You need to get food. Is this normally how you do it? Have you raided from Fluttershy before? It's odd that she doesn't seem to realize it could be taken as a bad thing. But getting back to the stealing... Has Fluttershy noticed food going missing before? Are there reports of this happening elsewhere around town? Make it all fit with the larger world.

>"It's a long story"//

There are a few other spots like this where you're missing punctuation.

I also wonder if you're aware of the series of stores that became popular about a year ago, where a pony would find a bat pony breaking into their home at night. There was a particularly well-known one involving Rainbow Dash. I just ask, because this just feels like a variation on that series.

The two main things I'd point out as needing help are the general editing and the emotional engagement. I've got a brief discussion at the top of this thread on "show versus tell" which explains what to look for on that front and why it doesn't work, though I've already pointed out several examples. I couldn't be exhaustive in my listing.

It may just be a symptom of that blunt emotional portrayal, but I didn't find the events that engaging. These characters don't really struggle with anything, and overcoming an obstacle is the kind of thing that gives a story momentum and purpose. Moonlight doesn't have to do anything; her problem just gets solved for her. Fluttershy doesn't go through any turmoil about how and if she can help the filly. She just feels sorry for her and offers her a place to live. So she doesn't resolve any sort of conflict, either. Character growth can be a stand-in for conflict, but that doesn't happen to either of them. Their characters don't change any as a result of the story's events, and we don't get much back story on the filly. She has a pretty generic premise to how and why she's there, so it's going to be hard to get the reader to feel sorry for her in particular, beyond what default there is inherent in the situation.

I could read deeper into it. Maybe Moonlight learns to trust as a result of this. Maybe Fluttershy gains confidence in finding a kindred spirit. But that's never brought out as a thematic element or given closure at the end. It's a pleasant enough scene, but it doesn't exactly have a story arc to it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2302

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She didn't care about being drizzled on.//

It's always a tad off-putting to have the first reference to a character be by pronoun, since they act through antecedent.

>How long was it since she had last been to Canterlot?//

The first couple of paragraphs weren't too bad, but then you lapsed into using quite a few "to be" verbs. I'll check the whole story and sum it up at the end.

>Pegasi soldiers/

Noun adjuncts are always singular. For example, it's "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

Okay, go back a couple comments, o the one where the narrator is asking a question. When you take a conversational tone like that, you're almost always using a limited narrator. Same with your use of "maybe" as a one-word sentence. It lacks the formalism of an omniscient narrator. A limited narrator speaks from a particular character's viewpoint, essentially being that character and reflecting her thoughts and impressions. Now, look at this:
>The blue-coated unicorn//
Trixie's the only character so far, so if it's a limited narrator, it must be in her perspective. However, that implies she's the one choosing to use this phrasing. Would she really refer to herself like this? Would you call yourself "the person" in your own internal thought processes?

>"'Lest We Forget', hmm?" She said aloud//

This may be a symptom of a recent problem with GDocs, but the fact that dialogue ends in something other than a comma doesn't change how you'd capitalize a following speech tag. "She" shouldn't be capitalized.

>only the falling rain bearing witness to her words. Above the words//

The second "words" actually refers to the epitaph, but it's confusing, as if both of these are talking about the same thing.

>Now she was back to wandering the world listlessly//

It's been a while since Trixie was mentioned, so this "she" seems to refer to Twilight.

>She felt, more than heard, the hoofsteps of another pony//

This isn't that bad, but it's a pretty cliched thing. It'd help if you sounded more original, with some more evocative imagery of how she perceives this and how it makes her feel. There's a similar problem with her earlier ambiguity over whether it's rain or tears running down her face.

>rai-Oh//

Please use a proper dash. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread. And you don't need to capitalize after one.

>holding her head up eye//

Something's off here. I'm guessing you didn't intend to have that last word there.

>"Ah," Celestia nodded//

You have that punctuated like it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>meet the one time, when Twilight invited me to come meet//

Watch that close word repetition.

>"I-" Trixie cut herself off//

Use a dash, and it's not necessary to narrate trailing off or getting cut off when it's already apparent from the punctuation.

>feeling her cheeks burn with embarrassment//

Feeling her cheeks burning already connotes embarrassment. It's redundant to identify it as such, but it also feeds the reader a conclusion instead of getting him to make it on his own. We normally don't have explicit knowledge of others' emotions and have to interpret them from people's behavior and appearance, so it feels more natural when you go about it that way. The biggest things to avoid are overuse of emotions as adjectives and adverbs, and by using these "in/with/of emotion" phrases. There's a bit of discussion under "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>each needing the other to commiserate//

This is similar to spelling out character emotion. Be careful with spelling out character motivations or intentions. So far, Trixie hasn't commiserated or appeared to need anything, so you're telling me that before I've even had a chance to figure it out. Let this come through indirectly from their interaction.

>I was attracted to that.//

You're relying on the reader picking this up just because Trixie says so, not because she demonstrates it in any way. Here's really where you should use a limited narrator to good effect, if you actually intend to have one. What sorts of thoughts and images run through her mind? Why physical sensations do they cause? What brief anecdotal moments occur to her of times she found Starlight endearing. Here's where you really engage the reader in Trixie's feelings by bringing them alive, not just rendering them as a five-word summary.

You should also look at the section on "talking heads" at the top of this thread. Here is the sum total of the narration over the course of 8 paragraphs:
>Trixie took a deep breath, and she said//
>Celestia said//
>Celestia noted//
>Trixie nodded//
>Celestia said//

>Ever day//

Typo.

>of my sister and I//

This is a common mistake people make because they're deathly afraid of misusing "me." It's the correct choice here, since "my sister and me" is the compound object of a preposition. You make the exact same error a little later.

>it...no//

Text tends to format a little better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it's one that begins a sentence.

>Yes, yes.//

It stood out a bit to me that you use this affectation of repeating a word. Still I could believe it a character quirk, except that both Trixie and Celestia employ it. It's weird that they both have this verbal tic, unless you're doing it intentionally and are going to call attention to it to make a point.

>sensing she wasn't going to get anything more//

Why are you jumping to Celestia's perspective? It doesn't accomplish anything. I don't learn anything critical or that you couldn't have couched as Trixie's interpretation of Celestia's behavior.

>It had been an enduring mystery to me why the Amulet was a fake.//

I don't understand this section. As best I can piece it together, the events of "Magic Duel" were Trixie's true power, and she'd been using a fake amulet. But why was Celestia surprised it was fake? I can't tell whether you mean Zecora was supposed to be its guardian after that episode, or if she already had possession of it. But if Trixie bought the fake one and knew it was fake, what was the point of going to Ponyville with it?

>Celestia's eyes were sad//

Let me see what this looks like so I can make my own judgment.

>not wishing to reopen the other pony's old wounds//

Don't spell out character intention like this. It's another good spot to utilize the limited narration to have a comment on Trixie's behalf expressing the sentiment indirectly. Something like "There was no need to twist that particular knife."

>But, Twilight Sparkle.//

Commas after conjunctions are rarely used correctly. This one isn't. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>colour of her eyes, and someday even the color//

I don't care whether you use British or American spellings, but be consistent.

>Trixie was certain it wasn't days, the sun hadn't risen yet.//

Comma splice.

The writing is good on this one. As I said, there are a few issues with the perspective and some blunt emotional content, but that's not too hard to overcome. Here's my problem with the plot, though: there's a twist in figuring out who Trixie is, but when you do, what meaning does it add? It doesn't change anything. You want the twist to illuminate something, make a point, not exist for its own sake.

Along those lines, there are two things a story can accomplish: show character growth or set up and resolve a conflict. On the former, neither Trixie nor Celestia comes to any realizations during the course of the story. They don't change as a result of the story's events. And the story doesn't have a conflict, either. Neither character struggles to achieve some goal. What message did you want the reader to take from your story? All I got was an "oh, so that's who Trixie is," but it didn't have any meaning. I didn't come to any new understanding of Celestia, Trixie, Twilight, or Equestrian history as a result.

I liked the story—it made for a good scene—but I'd like to see what you can do to give it a point. You're on the verge of it. Trixie admires Twilight despite never thinking she would have achieved so much. So what has Trixie learned from this? How has it affected her relationship with Celestia? How is the world different now from when the story began? Not necessarily something as neat and as explicit, but for lack of a better term, what do you want the story's moral to be, and how will you express it?

Ah, and I promised an assessment of "to be" verbs. Of the ones simple enough to do an unambiguous Ctrl-f on, I count 110, which is about one every 25 words, or a little more than one every other sentence. These are inherently boring verbs, since nothing happens. It's impractical to remove them all, but you should use more active verbs wherever you can. Even when something isn't in motion, "he stood there" is more engaging than "he was there." These verbs can really cause a story to stagnate. Every other sentence is pretty frequent to have nothing happen, plus they can indicate unnecessary passive voice or auxiliary verbs. It'd give your story much more momentum if you could reduce them to one every 30-40 words at a minimum.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2306

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

A word about semicolons. Ctrl-f through for them and check each one. A lot of them are misused. You should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but with most of yours, only one sentence would.

Watch that you capitalize "Your Majesty" and similar honorifics.

>there was an unmistakable ray of hope in her eyes//

Be careful to keep a handle on your perspective. You've sounded omniscient so far, but here, the narrator is expressing an opinion. To whom was this unmistakable? Not QT, since she can't see her own face, and it'd be weird for her to note her own emotion from such external evidence anyway. So that leaves Twilight, but she wasn't present for what happened early in the scene, so... I don't know.

>“…they do?”//

Since this isn't picking up from an earlier suspended quote, go ahead and capitalize it. You do this a few times.

>then…except//

Unless it stars a sentence, it formats better to leave a space after an ellipsis.

>I’m…” she swallowed, “…I’m sorry//

There's no speaking verb in your dialogue tag, but this sounds more like a narrative aside, anyway. Here's how to format them:
>I’m—” she swallowed “—I’m sorry
if she stops speaking for the action and:
>I’m”—she swallowed—“I’m sorry
if she doesn't (the former would make much more sense for this case). Apply this structure throughout the story. I see numerous more that need fixing.

So you do end the chapter in Twilight's perspective, and you do make some subjective statements in the narration there that make it a limited narration. It's possible you shifted perspective from QT to Twilight at some point during the chapter, but it's hard to pinpoint where, since so much of it sounds omniscient. You could stand to have a more uniform narrative voice.

>Quantum Trots did something unexpected. She raised her head and spoke//

Unexpected to whom? Twilight, presumably, but within a couple more sentences, you're saying something only QT would know:
>she wheezed, her vocal cords dry from disuse//
Twilight might read from her behavior that her vocal cords were dry, but just stated as a fact, this is something from QT's perspective. Keep a handle on whose head the narrator is in and keep it to their knowledge and perceptions. You can shift perspectives, but there's a finesse to it, unless you only do so at scene breaks.

>Twilight brightened a bit, hopeful.//

Don't be so blunt about how she feels. Paint a picture. The word "hopeful" doesn't create a visual image in my head. Show me how she looks and what she does. This is also repetitive with the "hopefully" of a couple paragraphs ago.

>“…”//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in better writing. The fact that a pause occurs is pretty meaningless. What happens during the pause it what sells it, but you're not giving me any of that.

>she…” The princess trailed off//

You don't need to narrate trailing off when it's already evident from the punctuation. You ddn't do this much, but it did show up again later in the story.

>a single tear tracing its way down the young mare’s cheek//

This is incredibly cliched.

>I want to believe that Cutie//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>three month old//

You're using this whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>nopony paid any attention to the meek, worried glances from the scrawny prison-mare who was trying to look in every direction at once//

There's wavering perspective all through here, but this one stuck out to me. It has to be from QT's perspective, because it explicitly says nobody else is paying attention to her. If they don't see her, they can't describe what she's doing, after all. Yet why would QT refer to herself as "the scrawny prison-mare"? People don't think about themselves quite that way. It's strange.

>“Yes, princess!” The guards replied//

When used as a term of address, a title would be capitalized. And the dialogue tag is incorrectly capitalized. It may be because of the question mark—GDocs recently had an issue where an auto-capitalization feature would force capital letters for a dialogue tag after a quote ending in a question mark or exclamation mark. It's been fixed, but it may have caught you when you wrote this. I won't mark any more, so please scan the story to make sure you don't have this error elsewhere.

>mom?//

Family relations also get capitalized as terms of address.

>ok//

It's preferred to spell it out as "okay."

>offspring….now//

One too many dots there.

>once nurturing//

Hyphenate.

>Quantum Trots, who had dropped the surname ‘Lulamoon’ when she entered school simply because it was too long to write in the application blank//

A tense emotional moment is a really bad place to wedge in an expository comment about the origin of her name.

>still beating//

Hyphenate.

>bowled over a warden//

Shouldn't there only be one warden?

>The populace, to their credit, were going about its business//

You waver on treating this as singular or plural. "Their" credit, but "its" business.

>science wing of the Canterlot Academy of Sciences//

Why would a science academy have a science wing? Isn't the whole place about science?

>maybe Princess Twilight Sparkle meant something different//

Now that you mention her... She said she'd go in the cell with QT, right? But then it's like you forgot she was there. She never got a mention the whole time, and she never did anything to try to prevent QT from escaping. For that matter, it's odd that she could escape so easily. Prisons have multiple checkpoints. There shouldn't have been an open path from the maximum security area all the way outside.

>Her eyes rolled back to the device, “But//

That's not a speaking action.

>worn out//

In this usage, hyphenate it.

Three prologues? Seriously? You know what on's for, right? I don't know why you don't just make these regular chapters. You're essentially saying these aren't all that important to the story. You've burned 10% of the story on stuff before the story even starts. Not that this material isn't interesting, but you're still stringing the reader on quite a bit. I can't help but wonder whether the first two prologues wouldn't do better if you worked that information bit by bit through the rest of the story. It's not the kind of thing I'd make you change, but I think it'd be more effective than telling one story for a couple chapters then telling the real one. Especially the second prologue. None of that information is particularly relevant yet, though I'll grant you it's the only time you can present it, if you're married to the idea of QT and Trixie having a personal interaction.

>Quantum Trots clamored up on shaky hooves//

You just got finished saying up had no distinction from down, yet you make one right away. Plus it's implied there's gravity here, which pretty much defines that distinction.

>muzzle - squinting//

Please use a proper dash. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>A cost must be paid//

Odd phrasing. You usually pay a price, not a cost.

>but found that there was nowhere to go//

This is already your sixth use of "found" in this short chapter.

>The choice is made. You have been judged and sentenced.//

I get why you used period here, since otherwise you couldn't tell it was two sentences. I suppose you could put them in separate paragraphs, but that would get annoying quickly. Why not just put periods on the rest of the italicized dialogue? It's not doing much to create an effect. I don't know what the lack of a period is supposed to mean.

>juicy looking//

Hyphenate.

That Apple Bloom accent. Seriously, tone it down. The reader knows what she sounds like, and it's enough to say she has a drawl if you want to eliminate all doubt. A few imitative spellings are fine here and there, but you don't want to make it slow to read. It's more about word choice and expressions.

>sweet looking//

Hyphenate.

>You a’ight sis?//

Missing a comma for direct address, and capitalization of family terms again.

>might just loose ya//

Loose/lose confusion.

>ah’ll//

If you really must spell it that way, at least capitalize it.

>quantum’s//

Capitalization.

>which only made her thick drawl that much more difficult to comprehend//

Apple Bloom doesn't have that bad an accent. Nobody has trouble understanding her, least of all the viewers. Why is it giving QT so much trouble? For that matter, you're writing a much thicker accent for her than she actually has.

>“You eat hearty!” She young one called.//

Typo.

>‘round//

This is a recurring problem. Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward since they think you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first.

>frustratingly-nameless//

This is the exception: two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb don't take a hyphen.

>Walking straight up to Quantum, she reached out and placed her hoof on the older mare’s forehead.//

This is a common issue with participial phrases. They imply concurrent action, so you have her putting a hoof on AJ's forehead at the same time she walks up to her. She probably wouldn't do so until she'd already gotten there. And as long as I'm copying out this sentence anyway, it's another of the many times you have a reference like "the older mare" which doesn't fit the narrative voice you're using. You're having QT describe herself this way.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

I hope you get to this at some point, but I'm confused about what's going on. I'm familiar with the premise of the original Quantum Leap, but there, it was purely a scientific thing. There was no intervention by some kind of death figure. So I don't see how he gets involved in this. It wouldn't seem to be anything inherent in the portal itself, but it'd also be odd if he needed her to use the portal to get access to her. Couldn't he have done so anywhere he wanted? Why not in her jail cell? I'm left with the most logical conclusion that the accelerator killed her or put her in a near-death state, but it's unclear.

>elaborately-dressed//

No hyphen.

>y’all//

As a fully licensed southerner, I can tell you it's pretty unusual for people to use this as a singular term.

Okay, Hal is now claiming to be a hologram, though the way he showed up with death sure seemed to imply it was his ghost or the real Hal or something. So was death a hologram as well? This is getting even more confusing.

>Hal treated lightly.//

I have no idea what you're trying to say. Maybe "treaded"? That would kind of require QT-as-narrator to read his mind, though.

>Exasperation was clear on Quantum’s face.//

Remember, she's essentially the narrator. How can she see her own face to evaluate it? And why would that be the method for her knowing what her emotion was anyway? There are far more immediate ways to tell. When you're sad, you know you're sad because of the kinds of thoughts you have and the physical sensations it causes, not because you see yourself frowning and realize it from that.

>Why not I guess?//

Needs a comma.

>No Elements of Harmony.//

Now I'm even more confused. I'll admit, it's been a long time since I watched Quantum Leap. But did Sam ever have to do something to restore history so it would turn out the way his reality was? I only remember him making changes to improve it, not to get it back to the one he knew. Yet here, you're saying QT's mission is to make it so that the Elements of Harmony will exist, but she remembers them existing. Basically, I don't recall Quantum Leap ever getting into a causality loop, but I could be wrong.

>We have no idea if this reality is or own//

Typo. And I guess I see where you're going. Quantum Leap didn't have alternate universes, but you do. Still, I don't get what death was saying. She can repay her debt to one reality by helping ponies in another? Seems odd. Why would that be the case? It also raises the question of why she would jump around to different ponies. There would be infinite universes where Applejack was in a crucial situation, so why pick this one? It sure adds to the sense that she'll never do any appreciable amount of good. There are already infinite ways to improve her own universe, so now if this spans infinite universes? Sure sounds hopeless.

Here's the other thing: What's QT's motivation? She doesn't sound contrite. Sam wanted to get back home from episode 1, but why does QT want to go back? So far, she hasn't said she does, which is probably the case. I'm betting the big reveal is that she can undo the disaster with her mother (which does require revisionist history to be possible), so as she realizes where things are going, she would have a reason, but right now, there's nothing for her to go back to. Death implied she'd keep jumping forever if she didn't achieve the requisite amount of good, but she hasn't stated any desire to do this, and she's not horrified so far by the prospect of jumping around. Hal hasn't explained anything about that. He probably doesn't even know yet. So why does QT want to help? When she finally agrees to start working on AJ's case, there's a vague sense of altruism to it, but it's not a reasoned response. She hasn't figured out what the death figure meant, and she hasn't stated any desire to make up for what she did beyond serving her sentence and possibly killing herself.

>Hal paused to take a breath//

You've punctuated that like a speech attribution, but it has no speaking action.

>The breeze felt a little chilly.//

Really, get rid of this line. This is a horrible way to end a chapter. If has zero importance, and there's no point to it. The previous sentence already brings closure to the chapter, so don't put a line of filler after it.

Now that I'm at the part where AJ is allowed out of bed to go to the market, there are a ton of "to be" verbs here. They're inherently boring, as nothing happens. It's impractical to remove them all, and you get more leeway with them in dialogue, but where possible, you should choose more active verbs to keep the story from stagnating. Even if there isn't motion involved, it makes the story more engaging, something like "he stood there" versus "he was there." In chapter 1.2, of the forms that are easy to do a search for, I count 92, which is one every 32 words, or about every other sentence. That's borderline, but not awful. Right here in the wagon ride to town, though, the rate shoots up locally. Take this paragraph:
>The dirt path widened, eventually opening into an unpaved street through the middle of a quaint, colorful town. Businesses and shops were in full swing. Ponies of all shapes and sizes were meandering about, and Quantum had to fake greetings to a number of ponies she couldn’t identify. The only quiet building was the library. Hewn from the trunk of a large tree, it cast a forlorn shadow, and was in need of a loving touch.//
The first sentence is great and uses active language. The next four all have one.

>She was nearly found out when she tried to levitate a syringe that the doctor left lying uncomfortably close to her pasterns.//

Hm. I would think she'd have the physical form of the pony she inhabits. If she takes the place of a pegasus, she wouldn't be able to fly, then? I'll see if you stick to that when you get to such a chapter.

>looking. The look//

Try to avoid close repetition like that.

>stylish looking//

Hyphenate.

>She leaned in close to Rarity, quieting to a whisper, “this//

Capitalization and a non-speaking action in the speech tag.

>Shuddering at the appalling scene//

You're breaking perspective here. QT wouldn't know this, and it's not couched as her interpreting it from Rarity's reaction. It's stated as if it's QT's opinion, but it isn't.

>less-than-stylish looking//

Hyphenate all tha, but also take note of how often you use this <blank>-looking construction. It gets a bit repetitive.

>She snapped back around, intent now to do whatever was necessary to keep her poor sewing machine from collapsing into a pile of parts//

You're going into Rarity's perspective again. Not that it's impossible to do so, but you have to do it smoothly. Still, I have to question whether it's necessary. Nothing important gets revealed while in her perspective, and the whole story is structured to be QT's experience anyway.

>The fashion-conscious white pony gaped.//

QT knows her name now. Why would she refer to her like this? You like to use these kinds of descriptors, but they're best used sparingly and in specific situations. For the most part, they're just telling me things I already know. There's a rationale in the section on "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome" at the top of this thread.

>eyeing her older sister, who was sitting there in a pile of hay with a self-satisfied expression.//

And this is all worded as external to QT.

>sighed with relief//

This is another way of being blunt with character emotion. There's also a discussion of "show versus tell" at the top of this thread that goes into rationale and the most common type of offending language, so I won't repeat that here. But I will dd that later in the same paragraph, you have a repetitive usage:
>he sighed with frustration//

>affection shining through//

And how does this look?

>more complicated ways to do things then just listen//

than/then confusion

>The minty mare//

It's really weird (and really repetitive) that she keeps referring to herself as this.

Good lord but you love to use "the minty mare" or "the minty-coated mare." I've already said why it doesn't work with being in her perspective, but it's also undesirable from a standpoint of sheer repetition.

>The pale yellow filly//

It's even perspective breaking to keep referring to the others by these descriptors, too. When she was first meeting them, fine, but she's known their names for a while now. She wouldn't need to use these kinds of phrases. In your own mind, do you refer to your friends as "the girl with glasses" or "the short boy"? Nobody does that.

>still living//

>once proud//
Hyphenate.

>where shadows laid an inescapable verdict upon her equine brow//

Why in the world would she use the word "equine" there? It's the default for her. It's not like she's in an unfamiliar form. She's a pony, so's AJ... I don't get why it would even occur to her to say this.

>Tuesday.//

Yes, as your chapter header just told me.

>The two classmates//

Another external reference that doesn't fit with this being in QT's perspective.

>stared at each other//

You just said he was behind her and she didn't need to turn around. So how can she see him?

>….okay//

One too many dots there.

>minty mare//

Nine more mentions of this in the chapter. Well, one's a"minty unicorn." Still, that's horribly repetitive even with this type of reference being wholly unnecessary.

>She mused allowed//

Capitalization and typo.

>Thinking he was being questioned//

How does QT know this? You have her reading his mind.

>The robust, toasty orange pegasus stallion//

This is getting ridiculous. Why would her internal thought process refer to him in these terms, especially in such a long-winded way? It'd have to be very deliberate, and she's not in the frame of mind to do so.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2307

>>2306
>probably even in her sleep. It was probably//
Watch that repetition.

>in suspect//

Word choice.

>his ebony, frosty-tipped mane//

Is she really going to take notice of the color of his mane right now? It's not even like it's unfamiliar to her.

>The minty unicorn wasn’t listening.//

Did she at least hear what he said? It isn't clear. If she didn't, the narrator can't relate it, since you're using a limited voice in her viewpoint.

>If you don’t like what I’m doing than just stay out of my way.//

Than/then confusion.

>I don’t know her personally Hal//

>Hot dang Cutie//
A few more examples of missing a comma for direct address.

>lissen//

See, half this overwritten accent doesn't even do anything. How would this be pronounced differently than "listen"? How would "raight" be pronounced differently than "right"?

>Quantum snugged Applejack’s little sister//

Did you mean "snuggled"?

>The look on his friend’s face gave him pause. He pondered a moment, and realized in four years of friendship, he’d never once seen her sporting a look of such abject horror. He followed her gaze and held up a hoof to shield his eyes from the sun.//

Why are you going to his perspective?

>When they were gone//

>Sweet Apple Acres was gone.//
Kind of repetitive.

>seven-story tall//

Hyphenate all that.

>dizzy looking//

Hyphenate.

>and so forth//

It's usually a bad idea to end a lit with a generality anyway, but this one in particular implies that I should know the rest of this list. Yet I don't. This is some futuristic, alien setting, so I have no idea what's there.

>Hearth’s…burning//

You'd capitalized both words in the previous usage.

>The cryptic statement eroded Quantum’s anger back into worry.//

The narration's her inner monologue. If she's angry or worried, make the narration sound like she is. The only way I know is from the dialogue and because the narrator is outright telling me so.

>to try to explain her encounter with the white pony to Hal//

Wait. When she was about to jump to Applejack, one of the shadows emerged from the crowd. I assumed that was Hal. If so, he should know this. If not, why hasn't that figure been mentioned since?

>yay tall//

yea

>Huh--?//

You'd been using dashes in earlier chapters, so why go with a double hyphen here?

>Quantum Trotts Lulamoon, daughter of Trixie Lulamoon and now unwilling dimensional traveler, turned around to see what was the matter.//

You're breaking perspective again. And that's not how you spelled "Trots" earlier.

>stretching to the horizon and easily dwarfing the tallest skyscrapers by two or three times//

You put a comma at the beginning of this participial phrase, so pair it with one at the end, or it changes the syntax and potentially the meaning.

>obliterating structures as a foal might knock over a sandcastle//

This couldn't stand as a complete sentence, so the semicolon preceding it doesn't work. This is also the fifth participial phrase in a single sentence. That's overkill. It's also a lot of synchronous things for the reader to keep track of.

>white hot//

Hyphenate.

>eight thousand hoof tall, sixteen mile wide, five hundred hoof thick//

Hyphenate all three of those phrases.

>Why should I even care what happens here!?//

She'd already remarked that she couldn't be sure whether Applejack was in her reality, but she never expressed this sentiment there. Yet the death figure told her simply that she had to change lives for the better. Why has she suddenly changed her attitude with regard to the Applejack situation and conveniently forgotten what her stated goal is? She was just musing on it recently, too.

>Everest//

So they have one of those in Equestria?

>such a derisive death by drowning//

Sure you didn't mean "decisive"?

>Hal doubted even the combined magic of all Equestria’s princesses and the elemental Keepers could waylay such an extinction-level event.//

Why are you going to his perspective? And if it's really that important, isn't it worth staying there for more than 13 sentences? It's unclear that as a holographic projection he even can have a perspective. I see later on that he's not just a construct meant to imitate a real person, but a projection of the actual one. Still, I don't think being in anyone's perspective but QT's is a good idea in this story.

>elemental Keepers//

If you're going to capitalize one of those words, why wouldn't you do both?

>It’s not a guarantee she’ll die on the return trip//

Why do none of these thoughts get end punctuation?

>Peering overtop of his device, his gaze//

Kind of a dangling participle. You more mean to say he was peering over the device. This says his gaze was, and while that's true, it's a strange way to word it.

>“Cutie!” Hal bellowed, “Tissy says isn’t the future!//

It would sound weird to have that attribution attached to the second part of the quote, but I have to assume that's what you've done. Actually, it'd work fine to have it attached to both, except you've already given the first part end punctuation.

>Her heart was throbbing in her chest and she was nearing the point of exhaustion.//

Another way to eliminate "to be" verbs is to decide whether they're really necessary as auxiliary verbs. Do you actually lose anything by phrasing this as "Her heart throbbed in her chest as she neared the point of exhaustion"?

>surprisingly light colt, on her back//

No reason to have that comma.

>a few more terse seconds//

"Terse" has more to do with language. Are you sure you didn't mean "tense"?

>best - If//

You've got a hyphen instead of a dash there, and you don't need to capitalize after it.

>a large tank-like device on his back, that was spitting out orange exhaust fire as he sped along.//

You don't need that comma.

>orange exhaust fire//

Someone as scientific as her ought to have a more accurate way of describing this.

>A single tear traced its brown-grey cheek.//

The single tear is about the most cliched thing you could have done.

>Stumbling, her hoof caught a crack in the street//

This is like the last dangling participle I marked. While it's plausible that her hoof stumbled, it's an awkward way to present it, and it's more to the point that she stumbled.

I'm going to be at this forever if I keep reading in this much detail, so I'm going to start skimming here. I'm not going to pick out any more mechanical or stylistic things, just any plot or character problems that stand out to me.

>upholstered in green leather//

As in the skins of dead sentient cows?

>The first thing she noticed was a visible haze filtering in and out of practically everything.//

If it wasn't visible, she wouldn't notice it now, would she?

I don't get what happened at the poker game. QT has a flush. It's not a royal flush, since she's got the 9 instead of the 10, but that's still a flush, which beats the pair that Hal said Tilt had. But QT leaves the 9 face down. Doesn't she realize she won? And how can Hal not know that? But nobody says so. Did QT deliberately hide the card and claim to have lost because she didn't want to have a confrontation with Tilt? It sure isn't presented that way. Really, it comes across as the author not knowing QT actually had a good hand, especially since Hal tells her it's junk.

>On the street below, she watched ponies//

Watch the proximity of modifiers. It sounds like she's the one on the street below.

>giggled merrily at her companion’s exasperation//

A really external viewpoint again.

>Woah//

Why can nobody ever spell this right? You get it wrong every time you use it.

>mostly still asleep. The room was mostly//

Watch that repetition.

>swathe//

That's a verb. You want the noun, swath.

>his voice came to her hears//

Typo.

>Scrunching her muzzle in thought, she eventually shrugged and continued//

More timing issues. The participle happens at the same time, yet the "eventually" explicitly says it doesn't, so it's contradictory.

>oh la la//

ooh

>The dowager matriarch preened//

What? When did you discuss this background of hers? And why is it relevant here?

>disbursing//

dispersing

>if needs be//

need

>what?”//

>fine!”//
Unless the whole quote is italicized, leave the quotation marks in normal font. They don't match the opening quotes.

>Amidst a moat of dusty cardboard boxes//

Starting here, you have three sentences in a row that start with this same structure, and two use "was" as the verb. Have some more variety.

>Hearthswarming//

Hearth's Warming. You get this wrong every time you use it.

>card-shark//

Oddly enough, this phrase has come into use through common misconception. It's actually supposed to be cardsharp.

>In her head, she saw the witch Twilight Sparkle//

Why are you going to her perspective here? It doesn't suit the story to be in anyone's but QT's.

>with the checkered red and green turtleneck//

Hasn't he been wearing that all along? See, this is also the problem with all the "toasty orange pegasus" and "minty mare" descriptors. They're supposed to help differentiate one character from another, but they're usually not necessary. There's nobody else here, so it doesn't help to narrow down that he's the one who's orange and wearing those clothes. And it gets really repetitive, as it keeps telling me things I already know about them.

>Hal felt a need to keep the conversation going.//

In Hal's perspective again. There's no purpose in going to him.

>even hours later, Quantum found herself sitting at a small outdoor bistro several blocks away from The Hungry Ursa//

Here's another spot where the action stagnates because of all the "to be" verbs you're using. This paragraph has six, and the beginning of a chapter isn't where you want the story slowing down so much.

>once and awhile//

once in a while

>You have no idea//

And eight more "to be" verbs in this paragraph.

>pharmacy—“//

Dashes can break smart quotes, too. It's got these ones backward. This is also something you should sweep the whole story for.

>Besides,” she sighed//

I've already bugged you about the difference between proper speaking attributions, narrative asides, and trying to use non-speaking actions as speech tags. But I have a different point now. "Sighed" is often enough used as a speaking verb, even though it makes a poor one, but I can live with it. However, it applies to the entire quote to which it's attached. I could see her sighing that one word, but not the entire three sentences. As an aside, it wouldn't spread out over the whole quote, only right where it's put. Or if you broke out "besides" as a separate quote, then the sigh would apply to it fine.

>Knock knock knock//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

>Good job Casanova!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>…thanks//

This isn't picking up an earlier sentence she left suspended, so go ahead and capitalize it.

>Quantum could near a number of them splash into the surf below the pier.//

Typo.

>The same hand. The exact same hand. Before she thought it was a royal flush – the strongest hand in the game. Now she knew it was just useless junk.//

No, it's a flush and a fairly good hand.

>Tilt’s hand was laying down on the table.//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Four sevens and the nag of hearts.//

I'll grant you that beats a flush, but your premise that this is a bad hand is faulty. It would have won her the pot when she first jumped here, and she probably wouldn't have drawn a card to improve it in this case, unless she assumed that's what Tilt wanted, since he knew he'd beat a flush, but you never say anything to that effect, so I can't assume it.

>everpresent//

That's two words.

>That single spot of light shown in her eyes//

Shown/shone confusion.

>Grunting and concentrating//

Most times, you'll set off participial phrases with a comma.

>T-twiggy//

It's a proper noun, so you have to capitalize both parts of the stutter.

>incased//

encased

>run for your life Twiggy//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>ill-repute//

No hyphen.

>it’s obscured, hooded face pointed squarely at her//

Its/it's confusion.

>midnight coated//

Hyphenate.

>If I gave you an’ inch//

What's that apostrophe for? You haven't cut any letters from that word. And you need a comma after this to set off the dependent clause.

>Hal, who had met Quantum in the upstairs hallway and was now floating on his wings insubstantially beside her, offered//

It's not a good idea to wedge a nineteen-word clause inside an otherwise two-word sentence.

>old fashioned//

In this usage, hyphenate.

>pouring through their archives//

Poring. And it's usually phrased as "poring over."

>and when she moved her leg//

Needs a comma after this to separate the clauses.

>on—??//

One question mark is plenty.

>wine-colored mare//

Wine comes in multiple colors. This is pretty ambiguous.

>just tapping on keys because it’s fun.//

Missing your closing quotes.

I have to say this chapter is really weird. I get that you're breaking from the pattern of Quantum Leap, that it is possible to rewrite history in major ways, and while you're holding out the possibility that QT might only be changing alternate timelines that don't affect hers at all, it look more like it is all a single timeline. But I'm not sure it was a good idea to do a "meanwhile, back at the farm" chapter. You've had plenty of chances to characterize Hal and Tissy, and Hal can easily fill QT in on what's been going on. In fact he's done that on lots of occasions. But it really puts a speed bump in the middle of the story, since it's all supposed to be about QT's experiences. There's not really a need to get the reader invested in Hal. Quantum Leap never did this, and I think that's a good reason why.

>power hungry//

Hyphenate.

>The pegasus felt pressure.//

So show me the evidence of it.

>Tissy’s deep wine-colored hoof//

You just told me what color she was a few pages ago.

>royal-looking//

>official-looking//
Repetitive phrasing in consecutive sentences, plus you really like to use the <adjective>-looking construct a lot throughout the story.

>You’re going to ask me if anything Cutie did changed anything in her mother.//

How would Twilight know if anything had changed? Wouldn't it just become normal history for her, and she wouldn't realize it hadn't always been that way?

>who I’d trust//

whom

Your perspective is really bouncing back and forth between Hal and Twilight a lot.

>found.”

>
>Hal found//
Watch that repetition.

>smiling photograph. He felt that if he stared at it long enough, perhaps the smiling//

Same.

>both of the figured//

Typo.

>twenty-thousand year old//

Hyphenate all that.

>vegetable carts that were laying among half eaten produce//

Lay/lie confusion and "half-eaten."

>twenty-thousand//

That's not a hyphenated term on its own.

>until rational thought began to return//

But you have a limited narration in her perspective. I'm supposed to have access to her stream of thoughts in the narration, but none of it's sounded irrational.

>Or at least, it looked like a pony.//

No reason for a comma there.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2308

>>2306
>>2307
>Heebieee~//
The tilde isn't really proper punctuation. If you're trying to create an effect with it, just describe what it is.

>Hearthswarming’s//

Hearth's Warming

>auto pilot//

autopilot

>Doctor….Who//

One too many dots there. And I'm not sure a vaudeville routine is a good fit for this scene.

>Doccccc//

How would someone even say that? It takes real effort to prolong a hard c.

>Good idea Doc!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>But….rocks?//

Not sure why you're using these four-dot ellipses.

>uh..go//

Needs another dot.

>repelled//

Are you sure that's the word you wanted here? It doesn't quite make sense. Plus it's a transitive verb, and you haven't given it a direct object.

>for Quantum to feel the pangs of mortification//

If you just tell me that's what they are, then I'm not going to feel them with her. Demonstrate her feelings through the effects they have on her.

>transmorgrified//

Usually, that's spelled "transmogrified."

>She rolled her eyes to the ceiling dramatically//

That's odd for her to assess her own behavior as dramatic.

>Quantum felt shame//

But I just have to take this as a fact. She doesn't act or sound shameful.

>you’re right Spike//

Comma for direct address. This is an intermittent but pervasive problem.

>*teensy*//

Put it in italics if he's emphasizing it, or you can make an aside there if you want a more detailed description of how he says it. But please don't use asterisks like this. I don't know why you suddenly started doing so 23 chapters in, but this isn't the only one.

>broken up//

Hyphenate.

>“Hey Doc,” Spike, who was now standing next to the cart with the empty basket swinging from his elbow, looked on.//

How does that amount to a speech tag?

>Quantum felt her anger rise//

Bluntly stating character emotion is something else you suddenly do a lot more in this chapter. I can't fathom why.

>I’m gonna die!!//

>Or hit her or something!!//
>Doccccc!!//
One exclamation mark is enough.

>”Uh, right, umm…umm….now!”//

You didn't leave a space before the sentence, which broke the opening quotation marks, and the closing ones are italicized. Leave them normal so they match the opening ones.

>missing, if she only knew, a major artery by only a few inches//

She's the narrator. If she didn't know, how can the narrator?

By the way, how is Derpy jumping on her without merging with her?

>Incon—incon--//

If you can make dashes, I don't know why you're also using double hyphens.

>the affect on various portions of the body//

Affect/effect confusion.

>Y-your//

Since that word has to be capitalized anyway as part of an honorific, capitalize all parts of the stutter.

>“…”//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in better writing. It's not really important that the pause happened. It's important why it happened, and what goes on during it is what indicates that. But you're skipping that to tell me nothing.

>Quantum let out a terse, equine snort.//

Wouldn't that be the default, since she's, y'know, equine?

>we have no idea just what affect events that occur in this moment in spacetime might have on us//

More affect/effect confusion.

>Cause//

Missing an apostrophe for the elision.

>overturned couches; flowerpots and their contents dumped all over the carpets; singed holes in the walls from the raging fire that apparently consumed at least parts of nearly every building in town//

Semicolons only get used as list separators when the individual items are long and complex or have their own internal commas. That doesn't apply here.

>closed..her//

Not sure what punctuation you were trying for there.

So, chapter "Heartbond II." You left off with QT reading her diary, but you're presenting the events in flashback form, not as diary text. It's a bit misleading that you ended the last chapter explicitly stating that they began reading. It implies that this chapter would be what they read, but it's not. In fact, it couldn't be either of their recollections of the events, because neither one of them witnessed any of it. So it's breaking perspective to present it this way. The best you could say about it was that maybe QT is imagining it as happening like this, but if so, it warrants saying so. As it is, you're showing me events firsthand that your perspective character never witnessed, the other character reading it never witnessed, and the only witness to it has left. So whose perspective is this supposed to represent? Either it's completely detached from the story and shown for the reader's benefit only, as QT would have no knowledge of this perception, or QT's somehow reading Heartbond's mind.

To explain why, I'll go a little into why this chapter couldn't be taken as the diary's text. People just don't write things like that. They write diary entries hours if not days after the events occurred, long after their memories have faded about details of the setting or enough of what people said to reconstruct entire conversations accurately enough to make them quotations. It doesn't ring true for the format, so I have to think you meant this to be a flashback, yet the only character who could have this flashback isn't there and is incapable of doing so anyway.

>S.M.I.L.E//

Missing the last period.

>follow the bath of the discarded bottles//

Did you mean "path"?

Yeah, I have to say this whole chapter was ill-considered. If it had been QT flashing back on some of her own memories, fine, but this doesn't fit with any perspective useful to the story. I don't doubt that it's an accurate portrayal from Lyra's perspective, but as it's presented, it's not something QT could know, so it's not even informing me of what she learned by reading the diary. I can't tell how much of this she knows now, and anything she doesn't is kind of cheating as to providing information to the reader that your primary perspective character can't know, so it's never going to affect her. I think you'd do far better to write this out as the text of the diary instead of dealing with it as a flashback. The way you ended the previous chapter is even misleading on this front.

>Twilight was trying to vain to nose Spike encouragingly//

Typo.

>Derpy furrowed her brow, smiled that lopsided smile of hers//

And just two paragraphs later...
>Quantum and her holographic mentor smiled the exact same smile.//
It gets a little repetitive.

>With Derpy hovering in the air//

The rest of the sentence isn't affected by where Derpy is, so I don't get why it's phrased as a qualifier.

>“What’s the title?”//

Don't italicize the closing quotes, since the opening ones aren't. You do this a fair amount of the time.

>unicorn-turned stallion//

Hyphenate all that.

>Twilight saw a hurtful rage in her student that, for a brief second, shed some light on Quantum’s final visit with her mother and the rash actions that started her tumbling through time.//

Now you're going into Twilight's perspective? I mean I can't tell you it's wrong to do so. But I think it's hurting the story's theme. I've mentioned this a couple times now, and I'm planning to sum it up at the end.

>Spike, forcing himself away from his own feelings//

Wait, now you're going to jump to Spike's head?

>her general sense of terror//

That's so vague as to mean nothing.

>Quantum sprinted to the bookshelf//

Wait, did she leave the pad behind? Why would she be willing to give it up? If it's really going to capture Twijack's attention, she can still take it with her and hold it mesmerized. Yet you never say what happened. One moment, Twijack seems fixated on it, the next, she's throwing it.

>Hogtied and hanged, the rope about Quantum’s neck//

Dangling participle. You're saying the rope is hogtied and hanged, not QT.

>For a moment, Twilight thought she might be getting through//

Even if you insist on inhabiting QT's companions' perspectives at times, it's a bad idea to shift viewpoint as often as you are in this chapter. There's a brief discussion of "head hopping" at the top of this thread that explains.

>books laying all over them//

Lay/lie confusion.

>back and I’ll give this back//

Watch that close repetition. In fact, you use some form of "back" three more times in the following two paragraphs.

>She’ll see to them first.//

>I’m sorry you had to see all that.//
And then a close repetition of "see" soon after.

>and her legs were hardly apple-bucking material//

You can't have it both ways. When QT was Applejack, she underestimated the strength of AJ's legs and kicked the tree over. But now she's restricted to her own leg strength instead of Doctor's?

>have some affect on//

Seems like you always choose the wrong one. It's a little more delicate matter to tell them apart as verbs, but "affect" is particularly rare to use as a noun. It's more like a mien, a quirk, a way of doing things. "Effect" means a result as influenced by something.

>He sounded like a schoolcolt about to ask the filly of his dreams to the prom, and he was thankful when Derpy broke the moment up.//

That single sentence inhabits two different perspectives.

>Cause//

Needs an apostrophe (and make sure it's not backward). You consistently miss this elision.

>Hal felt a thickness rising in his throat/

Going into his perspective now.

>as if to challenge fate itself//

And within the same sentence, you're back out. This is a pretty external assessment, since he'd know the purpose behind his reaction. He wouldn't have to speculate about it.

>both it and it’s contents//

More its/it's confusion.

>Spike, who was simmering with confusion and about to pop, scattered his thoughts all over the floor like marbles and sprinted for the door.//

Now into Spike's head. You're all over the place in this chapter.

>Discarding the splintered object//

You'll normally set off a participial phase with a comma.

>Spike, momentarily awed by the doctor’s sheer audacity, felt a welling of dragon pride swell in his breast.//

I give up. Suffice it to say this chapter needs an overhaul of perspective.

And as it turns out, the last chapter of this arc does the same thing. You're switching perspective every few paragraphs at the beginning. For that matter, you'd have to be careful not to refer to QT as "the minty mare" while in Spike's perspective, since that's something he doesn't know.

>backpeddled//

backpedaled

>“Fundamental…yook-lid-ee-an Geometry?”//

Book titles get italicized (but not the question mark, since it's not part of the title).

>soon-to-be//

As you've used this, it shouldn't have hyphens. It's a subtle difference but you're using them as a standard adverb. If you'd put them after the "her," it would need the hyphens.

>even think she realizes she’s even//

Watch that repetition.

Shypie's ability to read any book just screams plot convenience. Neither Fluttershy nor Pinkie has this ability, so where's it coming from? Pinkie did have the uncanny ability to find books (which you already had Spike exhibit), but she couldn't decipher things. And you never explain why she would be able to do this. Pinkie Sense is a huge stretch, as it was always far more vague and relegated to the kinds of proclamations you see in horoscopes, not the ability to read foreign languages.

And Shypie's long words just get irritating to read. It's a huge speed bump, and you don't want to slow down the reader like that, particularly because it creates the exact opposite effect of what you want: that she's rattling these words off rapidly. Just give her regular dialogue and have the narration note what manner she uses.

>gravely, masculine voice//

"Gravely" means "in a grave, solemn, or weighty manner, and an adverb doesn't even parse there." You want "gravelly."

>The leg’s owner - a stocky, middle-aged gray unicorn stallion with a short-cropped black mane and a stack of books levitated beside him, seemed just as startled.//

Why do you start the appositive with a dash (well, you've actually used a hyphen for some reason) and end it with a comma?

>The Stallion//

Why is this capitalized?

>Now the stallion looked downright distressed.//

You have him looking worried, then distressed, but you never say what any of it looks like.

>hoping for enough mirth to break up the strange conversation//

You're switching perspectives in the middle of the paragraph. My previous excerpt was from eariler in the paragraph, and the stallion isn't going to evaluate his own expression. Yet here, you're communicating his internal impression, and not in a way that QT could read it from him. It's also strange to inhabit the perspective of a character who hasn't even been identified yet.

>Turning to the bench//

Look at the sentences of her physical description. They're pretty repetitive in structure. They all start out the same way and have the same inflection. It gets to be like reading a list.

>I wouldn’t be so bold to assist you even know//

Typo.

>I-Imagine//

Unless it's something like a name, which has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>apparently feeling the intimidation that radiated from it//

I just wanted to pull this out as an example of why you don't need to jump around in perspective. It's very possible to show how Hal feels through QT's observation of him.

>Her gait and the pronounced stoop she forced herself to walk with was//

Subject-verb number mismatch: gait and stoop was.

>As the slowly cantered by//

Missing word or typo.

>Twilight looked uncertain.//

Let me see it and decide for myself.

>I-I know Spike.//

I assume she knows Spike. She's talking to him, after all.

>The little dragon looked concerned.//

And then this similarly telly and repetitive thing in the next paragraph.

>Someday.”//

Why are those quotation marks there?

>Twilight’s studies under Princess Celestia are complimented by some coursework at the local college//

Unless the courses had nice things to say, you want "complemented."

>H-Hold//

Stutter capitalization again.

>M-missus//

And that's the opposite problem. It's a title attached to a name, so it has to be captalized anyway. Thus both times in the stutter should be capitalized.

>You sound really...melodic, today.//

Why is that comma there?

>it was obvious he was now burning with worry//

If it's so obvious, why don't I get to see it?

>Twilight’s expression wavered between confusion and uncertainty.//

To further beat it into the ground: Let me see this! If I don't see it, it isn't real. It's just a cold fact I file away, not something that gets me invested in the characters.

>Spike felt himself deflate in time with the bowing of her head and the disappearance of her smile//

Why are you shifting to his perspective?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2309

>>2306
>>2307
>>2308
It should be pretty obvious by now what needs attention. I couldn't be very thorough after the first few chapters, so apply all the mechanical fixes throughout. Don't assume I listed every instance.

There are three major issues with this story for me. The first is that it gets very blunt with emotional information at times. I marked quite a few of those, but there are a lot more. It should make your hair stand on end whenever you type an emotion in adverb form or when you attach a phrase like "in excitement" to an action that already paints your character as excited.

The second is that you have very unsteady perspective at times, and it seemed to get worse the further into the story I read. Actually, the third item is about perspective as well, so I'll lump them together.

You start the story building up QT's past and her emotional involvement in the situation. And the whole story's about her, her experiences in each of these scenarios, how she feels about what she's trying to do, and her wish to relate to her mother. Despite the length of the story, there really isn't room in there for the other characters, not unless you want to devote equal attention to all of them. By the time you get around to showing me Hal's personal life, it's too little, too late. You left him behind long ago, and it feels pretty artificial to try cramming in some reason to have the reader care about him. Not that you can't get at his emotions as well; as I've said, you can still interpret them through QT's eyes. Yet on top of that, we don't even learn much about Hal during the entire chapter we spend with him. He's a pretty generic devoted friend, there's nothing about him that surprised me, there's never any conflict introduced for him besides the obvious "gotta get QT home" that the story is going to have anyway. You get 53k words into the story before you even try to make a character out of him, and it just comes across as forced. Let the story be about QT. There's no reason to go to any other character's viewpoint but hers. They're all along for the ride, they don't have anything critical to add that they can't do as seen by QT, and they don't have any interesting motivations. Besides, there's nothing that happens in this chapter that he couldn't just tell QT about during one of the other chapters, so it's not like it's your only opportunity to give the reader this information.

A brief aside here. I'm not going back to edit my earlier comments, but I see now that Hal's hologram is really him, not some AI projection, and there's still an ambiguity about whether QT is affecting her own reality, so all that's fine. I understand what you're doing.

One of the biggest things you did to break the perspective was the constant use of phrases like "the minty mare" to describe the characters. I saw the Seattle's Angels folks commented that they were a bit off-putting yet tolerable, but those guys are missing the bigger point. When you have a narrator in QT's perspective that keeps using those phrases, it implies she's the one choosing to describe them all that way, including herself. When you're planning your day, you don't think of yourself as "the brony author." You don't think of your neighbor as "the long-haired lady." It's just unreasonable to present them that way, and you do it so often that it also gets mind-numbingly repetitive. If you want an omniscient narrator to wax poetic, fine but if you want a limited narrator to do so, it had better fit the character and the way she thinks about things. And people just don't think in terms of these descriptors in the vast majority of situations, particularly not for people they know well and particularly not for themselves. No matter where someone might draw the line of how much of this is too much, it's just incompatible with the perspective you're using. "Minty mare" appears 130 times in the chapters through 6.1, and that's not even counting close variations like "minty-coated mare," not to mention the "toasty orange stallion" that keeps popping up as well. This is not something you should be doing in good writing.

Heartbond's letter is another example of broken perspective. It's shown from a viewpoint that no character in the story could have. It's a live witnessing of events that none of the characters present knew anything about, and the only ones who did, Lyra and Bon Bon, aren't capable of remembering it anymore. So whose perception is this, and how do they have it? It doesn't make the least bit of sense.

In summary, I think chapter 4.1 is a bad idea, trying to infuse reader empathy into a character who's never given more than a generic stake in the story and does it so far into the story that it's forcibly wedging that empathy into a character the reader has spent 50k words conditioned to see as nothing more than scenery; chapter 5.5 is a bad idea in that it's detached from any possible perspective and probably should just present the diary's text instead of acting out a scene nobody could have knowledge of; and the occasional forays into various other characters' heads (including, Spike, Hal, and Twilight) aren't accomplishing anything. They never say anything critical to my understanding of the story, and you often flit right back over to QT within a few sentences anyway, so even you didn't consider it worth staying there.

It's a good story with a couple of prominent missteps and a lot of little things to clean up, but if you care to whip it into shape, I could see posting it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2322

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Look at your very first paragraph.
>Sunset stood in front of the portal, feeling the slight tingle of the swirling magic in front of her.//
Every one of the first four sentences has the exact same structure: she did this one thing, participling this other thing. You're already showing the reader that it's going to be very repetitive. Authors just starting to gain experience often latch onto participial phrases, absolute phrases, and "as" clauses because they sound unusual and sophisticated. They don't turn up much in everyday conversation, though, so they stand out easily, and it doesn't take a lot of them before they get repetitive.

>are ya?" She heard Applejack's voice say from behind her//

Speech tags following dialogue shouldn't be capitalized.

>not wanting to tell her friends the truth//

You really shouldn't spell out why a character does something like this. You have a limited narrator, which is the perfect vehicle for implying it. You've already given us access to Sunset's stream of thought, so what kinds of things might run through her mind to reveal this to the reader more subtly?

>in a frustrated tone//

Missing your end punctuation here. Also, just like you shouldn't spell out why characters do things, you shouldn't spell out how characters feel. The narration is her internal monologue. Make it sound frustrated. It shouldn't sound much different than whatever she might say out loud if she were frustrated. It's not just what the narration says, but how it says it.

>Sunset looked across her friends, all of which still looked worried.//

Watch the close repetition of words like your "looked" here, and this is another spot where you're bluntly feeding an emotion to the reader. You're basically telling me what to think about the character instead of presenting the evidence and letting me interpret it on my own. It's like the difference between saying someone smiled and saying he was happy. They both ultimately give me the same information, but the first way lets me see it and judge it the same way I'd judge a person I saw in real life. That's why it creates a much more authentic impression.

>Rainbow cut her off//

I can already tell that from your choice of punctuation. It's redundant to narrate it.

>Rainbow trailed off//

Same goes for that.

>Sunsets hand//

Missing apostrophe.

>The memories brought a smile to Sunset's face.//

If you leave this so vague, it doesn't mean anything. A couple of quick examples will carry far more power than a generalization.

>The distantly familiar feeling of being covered and fur and having a horn returned to Sunset as her body flowed through the portal.//

Now you're really on to the "as" clauses. 6 of the first 9 sentences in this scene all contain one.

>The awkwardness of being a pony again was compounded by the immediate soreness from landing so hard.//

What's awkward about it? For that matter, this scene so far uses very bland wording. Everything's so factual with no life or emotion to it. If she really feels awkward and hurt, reflect that in how she delivers the narration.

>momentos//

mementos

>Sunset didn't know what to think at first. She never had a full understanding of the inner workings of the portal, so her first thought was that it might've sent her into some other alternate universe. An alternate universe where everyone was still a pony, but definitely not Equestria.//

If all this is so startling to her, then why is her internal voice delivering it as if it's the most ordinary thing she's ever seen? She should sound surprised, scared, curious... something. But she just sounds ambivalent.

>Concern grew inside Sunset//

I don't doubt it, but don't tell me she's concerned. Demonstrate it.

>She wondered what the hell she just dropped into.//

Now you're starting to put a little life into the word choice. But here's another problem. There are certain kinds of verbs that cover knowledge and perception, like see, hear, wonder, know, wish, and want. It's not necessary to use them in a limited narration, since the narrator can simply express those things for the character. You don't need to say she sees something, because it's already implied—since the narrator describes it, the character must have seen it. Same here. Don't say she wondered this. Just have the narrator wonder it for her: What the hell had she just dropped into?

>crystal kingdom//

That'd be capitalized, and it's an empire.

>backpeddled//

backpedaled

>Sunset's mouth hung open at the sight//

You just said the same thing two paragraphs ago.

>Her mind desperately tried to reason that this was just some strange alternate universe the portal put her through as some sick joke//

You said that same thing earlier as well.

>laying on top of multiple houses//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to get right.

>; that one it just covered completely in rubble.//

This couldn't stand on its own as a complete sentence, so the semicolon isn't used right.

>specs//

This means either eyeglasses (spectacles) or technical requirements (specifications). You want "specks."

>across her back. She got up off her haunches and walked across//

You have a number of spots like this, where there's a word repeated in a close space.

>the rest of the buildings casted dark shadows//

In most senses of the word, the proper past tense is "cast."

>reflexifly//

reflexively

>the beasts reflective exoskeleton//

Missing apostrophe.

>It's razor-sharp legs//

Its/it's confusion. When you're using it to indicate possession, it should never have an apostrophe. Possessive pronouns don't, like my, yours, his, theirs.

>in a shower of concrete in dust//

I think that second "in" should be an "and."

Basically, this story needs some editing help, it has a lot of structural repetition, it's often too direct with emotional information, and the narration sounds awfully lifeless for one using a limited perspective. As I go on to chapter 2, I see it's just more of the same. Note that I wasn't exhaustive in pointing things out. I just marked the first one or two examples of each kind of problem to help you learn to spot them on your own. You'll have to scour the story for other instances of them. If you can get these issues tuned up, then I'd be able to read further in to see how the deeper things like plot and characterization go.

Thank You Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2323

Wanted to say thank you for taking the time to conduct such an exhaustive review of Quantum Vault. Clearly some time and thought went into that, as opposed to glossing over a story and merely providing token feedback. Regardless of the nature of the comments/questions/suggestions, it's always an honor for a writer when a reader/reviewer takes that much time to consider their work.

I'm going to assume from what you said about not going into this level of detail unless you feel a story is of sufficient quality to mean that overall you enjoyed it - again, I offer my appreciation and my thanks for your consideration. (I am also assuming that it is better to reply here than directly back to Equestria Daily's fanfiction email, given you mentioned this is a place for extended feedback.) I'm hopeful that Equestria Daily will feel the same way!
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2326

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>station was devoid of life, with the exception of a single pony sitting on a station//

Watch that close word repetition where it isn't necessary or creating an effect.

>out, letting out//

Same deal.

>It's nice to see you too Rare//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>to get my letter out to y'all//

Did she write it to multiple ponies? Because as a licensed southerner, I can say it's pretty rare for someone to use "y'all" as a singular term.

There are a few brief discussions of common writing topics at the top of this thread. You ought to read the one on saidisms.

>five star//

You're using this whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>Applejack sighed//

See, here's the problem with some kinds of saidisms. This applied to the entire quote, but no way does she sigh all that.

>two friend's surroundings//

You've made that a singular possessive where it needs to be a plural.

>She moved her gaze downward, looking once again at Applejack.//

Have a look at this paragraph. Except for the first sentence, every one of them has a participial element tacked on the end. It gets very structurally repetitive.

>looking far too perfect for all of the work she undoubtedly had been doing all day//

This is clearly from Rarity's perspective. but you began the scene in Applejack's, not because it took her voice in particular, but because Rarity wasn't there yet. You don't want to skip around on perspective that frequently, and it's not accomplishing anything to do so here.

>As she walked through the last stretch of woods into a clearing, Applejack felt a soft warmth in her chest.//

And you stayed in Rarity's perspective for the grand total of one paragraph. If it's worth going to her, isn't it worth staying there a while? I foresee you might need to read the discussion on head hopping at the top of this thread, too.

>back, and turned her head back//

More repetition.

>cozy looking//

Hyphenate.

>which Rarity figured was to be used as a table//

And two paragraphs later, you're in Rarity's head again. You really need some consistency in the perspective. This wouldn't be an issue so much for an omniscient narrator, but you've made some of these statements very subjective, like the one about AJ's hair looking far too perfect, that pull this into the realm of a limited narrator.

>Applejack led Rarity onto the porch, stopping in front of a wooden door//

Here's another danger of participles, beyond sheer overuse. They imply that things happen at the same time, but Applejack wouldn't stop until after she'd led Rarity there.

>missey//

missy

>me-//

Please use a proper dash, not a hyphen, for asides and cutoffs. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>Blindsided by her friend's alarmingly good impression//

This is the kind of thing you don't want to over-explain. Let the reader figure it out from her behavior. You've had a couple of spots where it felt like you had a more subjective narrator, and if that's what you want, use it to good effect. Have the narrator make a comment that voices Rarity's internal though as if in Rarity's own voice and with a conversational tone, something like: "Wow, that was... rather spot-on."

>well received//

Hyphenate.

>"SNORT"//

Well, putting it in quotes, means she literally said the word. Just describe the sound.

>The two friends panted as they lay on the ground//

I don't get the purpose of a scene break here. There's no change of location or perspective, and there's barely a time skip.

>Applejack giving a satisfied chuckle at the physical pun//

That sounds a whole lot more like the author pointing it out than a natural thought for AJ.

>"it has to be done my way"//

This is nested inside another quote, so use single quotation marks.

>You know Rare//

Another spot that needs a comma for direct address. Suffice it to say you're missing a lot of these. I'm not going to mark them all.

>Of course not darling//

And again. Plus you're having her use "dear" and "darling" far more often than she does in the show.

>laying on the wooden floor//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to get right.

>she said seriously,//

It's best to avoid emotion adverbs anyway, but you seem to have a penchant for attaching them to speaking verbs.

>I've got a goose problem//

Why in the world wouldn't she summon Fluttershy for that? And why wouldn't this occur to Rarity? You address it later, but it takes you a while to get to it. I'm surprised AJ doesn't immediately question why Fluttershy didn't come as soon as Rarity got off the train.

>small lake//

>small patch//
>small dock//
That's all in the same paragraph.

>if...they//

It formats better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence.

>...sweetie?//

She's not picking up from a sentence she left hanging earlier, so capitalize this.

>five hour//

In this usage, hyphenate.

>One of the geese quacked//

Their sound is usually described as a honk. Ducks quack.

>in disbelief//

These kinds of "in/of/with mood" phrases are best used sparingly if at all. They're almost always redundant with an action already in the sentence.

>it's head//

It's/its confusion. Possessive pronouns don't have apostrophes.

>she whined//

It's hard to buy Applejack as a whiner. It's also hard to buy her has someone who'd give up so easily on fixing a problem. We don't even know what she's tried so far.

>I could get used to that.//

She could get used to what? I don't know what she's talking about.

>Applejack laid down in the grass/

More lay/lie confusion. "Lay" takes a direct object, and "lie" doesn't. It's tricky in that the past tense of "lie" is "lay."

>trying her best to sound convincing//

This is already obvious. You don't need to spell it out. Give the reader some credit. If you're going to use a limited narrator, though, it might be nice to see AJ's internal reaction to telling a lie.

>We do not speak of last time.//

Pretty repetitive with the preceding sentence. And did you mean this to be a quote?

>Applejack lay on the opposite side of the path//

You got it right this time. But you're using this verb an absolute ton in this chapter.

>""YEEEEHAW!"//

Extra quotation marks.

>having dropped one of the s'more roasting utensils on the ground//

You've also used enough absolute phrases with that verb in particular that it stands out a bit.

I'm pretty much seeing he same problems in chapters one and two, so I'm going to skim the rest without noting repeat mechanical problems, so I can focus on the characters and plot.

>4//

Spell out numbers that short.

>What was that? Does she feel something for me? What should I do?//

You can do things like this in a limited narration, but they need to be rendered in third person or presented as quoted thoughts.

>She could see//

You use a lot of language to tell me that a character saw or heard something. That's rarely necessary for a limited narrator, since the narrator's perception is tied to the character. It's already understood that if the narrator describes something, the focus character perceives it.

>wondering what Rarity was doing//

This is another thing you shouldn't have to do in a limited narration. Don't have the narrator say she wondered it. Have the narrator wonder it for her.

>Rarity's sobs//

That's rather melodramatic. If you want this to retain an air of realism, don't go for such exaggerated emotional displays. Real people just don't do this.

>each others company//

Missing apostrophe.

Probably the most common romance plot we get is "character A is secretly in love with character B, works up the nerve to tell her, and it turns out character B conveniently and miraculously felt the same way all along." There's not much to distinguish your take on it from the masses of others, except that the writing is generally good, and the descriptions of scenery better. But the biggest trap they fall into is never showing me what attracted these characters to each other in the first place. And you have that problem.

The issue with declaring two characters in love is to convince the reader of it. Casual readers may well be satisfied enough taking the narrator's work for it, but that's a weak way to go. You want to demonstrate that they have real feelings, that they're equals in this. You started down the right path by having them admit they'd liked each other since the sleepover, but you stopped.

Really, there are two ways to go. This one's not for you, but you can have the story cover all that developmental stage of the crush so the reader sees it happen. The one that works better for your story is to go by anecdote, which is kind of what you started, but go through more events. What times did one of them do something that really endeared her to the other? How do those endearing qualities fit together for them? You want to make them look compatible, that they both do their part in contributing something to the relationship and getting something out of it. Basically, I don't know why they're in love. AJ decided she liked Rarity after the sleepover for vague reasons, and she respects her work ethic. And Rarity's side is pretty much the same. Everything's so generic. It's a very cute story with a nice tone, but it doesn't quite rise to bringing this relationship to life, since it's still mostly asking me to take it for granted. Prove to me that AJ would fall in love with Rarity, don't just tell me she does.

If you've ever fallen in love, think about how it happened. It's not just "I liked you ever since X happened." It's "I really like X about you, and that time you did Y, I realized we'd go well together, and whenever I'm around you, I feel Z." It can be kind of a subtle thing, but it's what gives a story that spark of authenticity and that it's really a two-way relationship.

So aside from that, pay attention to the items I had to mark multiple times, like editing problems, repetition, some blunt emotional description, and jumpy perspective.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2327

>>2323
Yes, I did rather think this was a good story, and for the most part, if I choose to give more than a couple of general ideas of what needs attention, it's because I felt the story was worth investing that much time in.

Replying here or through the email chain is fine, though you'll probably get a quicker response here, since it's not going through the middleman of the fanfiction email box. If you have any questions, please ask.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2331

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>and things that she enjoyed//

This is incredibly vague. It does nothing to create a visual or give me a peek into Rarity's character.

>thing in her list were//

Number mismatch.

>Rarity had also started to show respect for the Crystal Prep students//

This sounds more like an external evaluation than Rarity's own thoughts. She'd think of it more in terms of having the respect, not showing it. And it's illustrate having it better to show a few examples of what changed her mind than to leave it vague.

>who she was talking to//

whom

>once they had both calmed down//

You didn't really show them acting agitated, aside from a bit of the dialogue, so it's not clear what the change in their behavior is.

>shoppping//

Typo.

>just going to grab any types that looked appealing and just//

Watch repeating words close together like this in general, and this word in particular—it's one many authors overuse.

>you'll be ending up//

That's an odd way of phrasing it versus "you'll end up."

>Never before has a Crystal Prep student been so knowledgeable about flowers//

I'm not sure why it's important that nobody from that particular school has been so knowledgeable. If they want to say she's an expert, fine, but I don't know what it adds by qualifying it through her school.

>make vague ideas on what each plant meant//

Oddly phrased. And she's already gotten one wrong. What's her basis for trying to figure this out?

>The orange daisy means hatred//

Why would she sell something like that? If she helps all customers match the flower to the intention, how many are actually shopping for something like that?

>I can't force you to pick what you want//

I'm not sure this says what you wanted it to say.

>You've changed an awful lot since the Friendship Games, haven't you?//

Has she, though? And how would Rarity know? It's not like they've interacted since then, and at the end of the games, the entire CPA team was helping out.

>arrested," Sunny Flare took the gloves off and pulled out a phone from her pocket.//

You have a non-speaking action punctuated as a speech tag.

>five other Crystal Prep students, one of them being the other Twilight//

But wasn't Twilight going to transfer to Canterlot High right after the movie?

>love," she smiled//

Another non-speaking action punctuated and capitalized as a speech tag.

>she eventually made it to the counter with twenty//

I don't know if this is a global thing, but at least in Germany, they prefer to use odd numbers because they sit in a vase better that way.

>fished her pocket//

Usually, it's "fished in." And I'd expect her to keep her wallet in a purse or something, but it's certainly possible she carries it on her pocket.

>soon," Sunny Flare waved her out of the establishment.//

Another non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>I want to ask if we could see each other again someday//

Their interaction has been entirely ordinary so far, and there isn't any kind of limited narration showing Rarity's thought process of how she's developing an affinity for Sunny. So this just comes out of nowhere. Rarity doesn't have any apparent motive for saying this.

>thought long and hard about their upcoming meeting//

Vague to the point of saying nothing.

>its'//

That apostrophe shouldn't be there. It's in the wrong place anyway, but possessive pronouns don't have them.

>Welcome to my humble home!" She welcomed as Rarity opened the gate and stepped in.//

Capitalization. It doesn't matter that there's no comma at the end of the quote. A speech attribution still wouldn't be capitalized. And it's redundant to use "welcomed" as the speaking verb when she used the same word in the quote.

>be sure to wipe them on the carpet once we get inside//

Why would she want Rarity to do that? Are you sure you didn't mean something like the doormat?

>a boat sailing graciously//

You sure you didn't mean "gracefully"?

>stuff with her. I'm usually left alone, since the stuff//

Close repetition, and for some reason, this doesn't strike me as a word Rarity would use anyway.

>I just think it's wrong to have someone else's child that just got abandoned, if you know what I mean.//

That's a rather callous thought. I can see someone preferring not to adopt, but this is pretty extreme, and Rarity readily accepts it. I hope you'll make some kind of point out of this, but I'm guessing you don't.

>Rarity had noticed Sunny's change in mood.//

So let me notice it too.

>gently wrapped her arm around Sunny's shoulders//

Seems awful forward for people who barely know each other.

>hoping to cheer her friend up//

It's generally a bad idea to spell out a character's intentions like this. There are ways to be subtle about it.

>wringed//

wrung

>But since Crystal Prep is just now a high school on the last year before I graduate//

Minor wording issues, but "just now" would sound better as "now just," and that "on" doesn't need to be there.

>had falled//

had fallen

>after another bite of her sandwich//

It's a bit odd in placing this after the longer description of her brushing the crumbs away when this happens first.

>she took another drink as she listened to what Rarity had to say//

This has a similar problem. It has her listening to Rarity's speech now, yet Rarity doesn't talk until the next paragraph. It's more that she's giving Rarity her attention, not that she already hears her.

>Whoa... I never thought of it like that.//

I don't understand how this can come as such a big revelation to her. Rarity gives her some very generic "do what you like" advice, and Sunny acts like it's an alien concept to her. Wouldn't this be the first thing to occur to someone?

The last paragraph is really vague and doesn't make a point. That's my main issue with the story as a whole. There's not much of a conflict here. Sunny is upset that she has a lot of interests, Rarity makes the not-so-groundbreaking statement that she can pursue more than one of them, and that's it.

Compare this to the previous story. Indigo and Rainbow share a lot of things about their past that might be unexpected, but there's nothing surprising here. There's not much description of all these other interests Sunny has, and while we do get an explanation of how Rarity started getting involved around the school, she's not exactly sharing a story of her own struggle. It was pretty effortless for her, and while it's appropriate for her to have participated in more clothing-related activities, it's not surprising. Neither one of those would necessarily be a problem on its own, but when there's nothing new, and it doesn't involve a conflict, it makes Rarity's story harder to get wrapped up in. Everything's just so nebulously defined about their back stories and why they're even interested in hanging out together.

I'd encourage you to take another crack at this. It stands alone perfectly well; I can't imagine it being hard to follow if a reader hadn't seen Good Sport. However, you do have another option. It's also qualify as a side story/sequel to Good Sport, and as such, you can have it added to that story's listing without going through review. If you want to go that route, send an email to the main submit box, submit@equestriadaily.com with a subject line of "STORY UPDATE: Good Sport" and provide a link to the Good Sport story page on Eqeustria Daily and this story's FiMFiction link (note that your submission form actually links to one of the comments), then state that you want it added as a side story or sequel. It'll be included in a story updates post soon after.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2332

>>2322
Ouch. Not even to the second chapter, huh? Well, thank you for typing all that out anyway. I just had a few questions about some of the points if you've got the time.

>Authors just starting to gain experience often latch onto participial phrases, absolute phrases, and "as" clauses because they sound unusual and sophisticated. They don't turn up much in everyday conversation, though, so they stand out easily, and it doesn't take a lot of them before they get repetitive.


What should I be replacing them with?

>Everything's so factual with no life or emotion to it. If she really feels awkward and hurt, reflect that in how she delivers the narration.


I do understand the need to spell out why she's feeling certain things, but how should I relate Sunset's emotion with the narration without it seeming dry?

>If all this is so startling to her, then why is her internal voice delivering it as if it's the most ordinary thing she's ever seen? She should sound surprised, scared, curious... something. But she just sounds ambivalent.


I'm not entirely sure what I need to change it to here.

>You don't need to say she sees something, because it's already implied—since the narrator describes it, the character must have seen it


So I should just show her reaction to it instead? Or just have the narrator wonder it and leave it at that?

Honestly, I'm not sure how I would make the narration not seem lifeless. Do you mean I should give the narration more inflection outside of Sunset, or I should focus more on giving her a more fleshed out stream of thought.

Not trying to sound like a smartass or anything, I just legitimately don't know how to fix those issues.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2337

>>2332
My apologies for not getting back to you sooner. I had a family medical situation this week.

>Not even to the second chapter, huh?

Well, don't take that the wrong way. It's not as if the story was horrible and I just couldn't stand taking another chapter of it. It's more like this: There's a list of stories awaiting review, and if I'm finding more problems than I can live with in the first chapter, it doesn't make sense to keep reading, since I could be moving on to the next story in the list. This is because 1) it's pretty likely subsequent chapters will have the same issues, and 2) even if they didn't, I'd still want the early chapters fixed up. Besides, if you do a good job with revisions and resubmit, I'll get to read the rest anyway.

>What should I be replacing them with?

There are times that it makes sense for a narrator to be very grandiloquent, but you do have to consider how the language fits the narrator. Your narrator is Sunset's internal monologue, basically. And while you get some leeway to make it an entertaining read (real people's internal monologues are filled with half-sentences and unvoiced impressions, after all), it needs to fit the character and situation. For a couple of examples, you wouldn't want to have a limited narrator using very difficult and obscure words if Rainbow Dash is the perspective character. It doesn't fit her. Or it doesn't make sense to go into lengthy descriptions of the setting if the perspective character would have her attention on other things, like she's in a fight.

So you want this narration sounding close to an internal thought process, and like I said, it's fine to ham it up a bit for entertainment's sake, but you don't want to overdo it. Simple sentences and compound sentences can do your heavy lifting. It's not like you need to keep a tally sheet on your desk to count up the number of participles you use. Just be mindful of them so you don't have a ton of them overall and you haven't clustered them locally so that 3 or 4 sentences in a row have them. Once every 3 or 4 sentences is usually a good amount to lend variety without getting repetitive, but the more vague answer is "not so often that it stands out to the reader," which can be mitigated by other factors, like if the prose flows very well, it might be less noticeable.

So I'd say first, it's fine to revert to simpler sentence construction for a lot of the prose. There are the basic subject-verb-object "he did this" sentences, where you can get descriptive on one or two of those three elements, or ones where you string multiple clauses together, like "he did this while she did that, and then this other thing happened." You can have 2, 3, or more clauses to vary length, but not so many that the sentence loses focus. To a degree, it also helps if you put the participles you do use at different points in the sentence. On the first comment I made, I noted that all of the first four sentences ended in one. If you instead stick one in the middle of a sentence here and there, it does vary the structure a little (having a participle at the beginning is considered somewhat weak, but it's okay once in a while). So part of it is reducing the number of participles and "as" clauses you use, and part is varying their placement in sentences. If you're worried about those simple and compound sentences also getting repetitive in structure, it's easier to get away with that. They're more ordinary, and it takes more repetition before the ordinary stands out. In an example I like to use, you wouldn't bat an eye at seeing "the" four times in a single sentence, but you'd definitely notice "ventriloquist" twice on an entire page. But you can even keep those simpler sentences from getting repetitive by avoiding having the exact same structure multiple times in a row and by varying how sentences start (with the subject, a prepositional phrase, an adverb, invective, etc.).

The rest of your questions dealt with how to get the narration to sound livelier. Basically, just keep in mind that the narration is Sunset's internal thoughts and perceptions. So put yourself in her place. What would you think about the event you're writing about? And more importantly, how would you think about it? Internal thoughts are barely different than dialogue. So another way to consider it is: if Sunset were saying the narration out loud to herself, how would she say it? I'll differentiate limited (the narrator speaks as the character would) and omniscient (the narrator is distanced from any character and speaks factually).

Omniscient: Just as Sunset began to pour her coffee, a loud bang rattled the house.
Limited: The wonderful brown liquid poured into the bottom of the cup, and—what the—? She jerked her hand back at that ungodly noise and peered out the window in case she might spot some harbinger of destruction.

So while the omniscient narrator sticks to facts, the limited one can sound pretty much like dialogue would, taking on a lot of its characteristic, like asking questions, getting interrupted, shouting, adding emphasis, and taking a conversational tone. Note also the use of subjective words (wonderful, ungodly), that have the narrator express the character's opinions. You've done that in your story, which is why I have you as using a limited narrator. You don't have to go this extreme in creating a conversational tone if you don't want, but it still illustrates the possibilities.

So consider the character's frame of mind when writing the narration. Does the character wonder something? Have the narrator ask a question. Is the character confused? Have the narrator stutter and make false starts. Is the character angry? Have the narrator make an exclamation or use emphasis.

Since an omniscient narrator can't take on such tone, your options for keeping the narration lively are reduced. Mostly, you have to be diligent about continuously showing the character's facial expressions, body language, and other cues that demonstrate how they feel. Omniscient's actually harder to write than most people would suspect. Limited gives you a lot more advantages in emotional expression, so make use of some of them.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2343

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'll say up front that I liked reading this story. It showed definite talent, but it does need some work in a few areas. I hope you'll be willing to put that work in.

Already, there's a dissonance in how you're telling the story. Here's the first sentence:

>I hum gaily as I pull the wagon along the simple dirt path.//

You've chosen present tense, which really brings the character in the moment. So far, so good.

Now go to the next sentence.

>That’s my job, you see.//

Now you're talking to an audience. That opens up a can of worms. Maybe you deal with it properly later and maybe you don't so it's not necessarily a problem yet. But when you have an audience, you don't want it to be nebulous as to who that audience is. Why are they here? Why does the narrator want to tell them? Why does the audience want to listen?

And just a bit later:

>Anyway, enough about me. You probably want to hear all about Trixie.//

You're really cementing that you have an audience. This doesn't really work with how the story is progressing and your choice of present tense. Present only works if the audience is right there traveling with her. But if they are, they can see all this stuff for themselves. They don't need the narrator to explain it, though maybe they need her for some of the back story or interpretation. More likely, you envision this as this narrator telling the audience her story well after it's occurred, but that would be in past tense.

>mane - she//

You've done a good job of using proper dashes, so I'll assume this hyphen was just an oversight.

>cutie-mark//

That's not a hyphenated term.

>The ponies seem to be getting excited, and I think there are two young colts of school-going age who seem especially thrilled.//

You use "seem" a fair amount. For one thing, it can get repetitive, and for another, it forces the character's conclusion on the reader. What do the ponies do that makes them seem excited? Let me see that and judge for myself. That makes for a more engaging read, as it's much closer to putting me there with the live action.

>herd of ponies//

I don't care if you leave it like this, since most people wouldn't find anything wrong with the word choice, but in the list of strange words for animal groups, it's actually a string of ponies.

>light-show//

That's not a hyphenated term, either.

>forgetfulness - I//

Another hyphen that should be a dash.

>cleverly-made//

When it's a two-word phrase beginning with an -ly adverb, it doesn't need a hyphen.

>“oohs” and “aahs”//

You don't need to put those in quotes. In fact, if you do, the plurals properly go outside, like “ooh”s and “aah”s.

>rearing on her hind legs//

That's what rearing is. It's a redundant description.

>“…you got//

Since it's not picking up an earlier sentence she left off, go ahead and capitalize this.

>The crowd looks kind of stunned//

This observer keeps telling me how the crowd feels without saying how she knows. I should know the same way she does: by reading cues from the crowd's behavior. So let me see it with her and make my own judgment.

>And then a young colt speaks up-//

Use a dash.

>right next the dragon//

Missing word.

>if she’s anything like her friend she might start showing everypony how the tricks are done//

You have a few spots like this where you need a comma between clauses. There's a brief section on "comma use with conjunctions" at the top of this thread hat explains.

>Once Trixie starts however,//

When you use "however" as invective like this, put a comma on both sides of it.

>Twili-”//

Use a dash.

>It’s bad enough that we live in a world where there are ponies who are outright better than you at what’s supposed to be your special talent//

I'm surprised this is that big a deal. That's how life is. Special talents aren't unique, and only one can be the best at any given skill.

>and then-//

Use a dash.

>do– this?//

Inconsistent spacing around the dash, but it's not the best use of one. A dash is pretty much no pause, but you seem to be implying one here. An ellipsis would probably work better.

>better - she//

Use a dash.

>flair that leave//

Subject-verb number mismatch.

>pegasi hecklers//

Noun adjuncts are singular. For instance, the plural is "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

>anypony that didn’t match up//

Usually, when you're talking about a sentient being, you'll use "who," not "that."

>It’s super effective//

Boo for Pokemon references.

>I worry a little//

You have her worry and be concerned a lot, but it's little more than a word when I don't get to see it in action.

>I think she’s really going to step up//

She says this for every character. Besides getting repetitive, it loses its punch.

>now closed-up//

Hyphenate all that. The whole phrase describes the wagon.

By now, I'll say one of the major impressions I have of the story is that I'm seeing a ton of dashes. That's not the worst thing in the world, but you'd rather the reader remember what happened, not some writing tic. You might want to cut back on them some so they don't stand out so much. And there are a number of them you left as hyphens. I've marked quite a few already, but there's not much point in being exhaustive. Just scan for them on your own.

>; while you don’t have very much at all.//

What comes after the semicolon couldn't stand as a complete sentence on its own, so the semicolon isn't really properly used.

You're giving am awful lot of the narrator's back story through expository narration. That's really going to limit how much the reader can identify with her. It's one thing to hear about it and quite another to live through it with her. It'd carry a lot more power if we saw a couple of these in flashback mode. That way, it's an experience and not just a list of facts.

>in future//

Missing word.

>anymore when she claims to be the best. Trixie doesn't even have her hat and cloak anymore//

It's best to avoid repeating all but the most mundane of words in a space that close, unless you're doing it deliberately to create an effect.

>All those foal's stories//

You're talking about more than one foal, so use a plural possessive.

>I- I//

Don't leave a space in a stutter.

It's odd that you never identify your narrator. I was all geared up for it to be some surprise character like Lyra or maybe Trixie was talking to herself the whole time. So it can come at a bit of a disconnect not to be able to attach all this emotional investment to someone, but on the other hand, if you'd rectified that all by providing an OC name, would it really change anything about her journey? Probably not.

The first obvious thing to fix would be any of the mechanical stuff I mentioned multiple times, and I'll stress again that I pointed out examples, not every instance. The other things I'll go into a little more detail on.

Early on in the story, you use a ton of "to be" verbs. It didn't stand out as much the further I got in. These are inherently boring verbs, since nothing happens. Readers want action, but this makes things stagnate. The beginning is a particularly poor place to do so. Of the easier unambiguous forms to search on, I count 327, which is about once every 26 words or even a little more than one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. You get somewhat of a pass for dialogue, but on the whole, you ought to be using more active verbs. Even where it doesn't involve movement, something like "he stood there" is more engaging than "he was there."

Next is the implied audience. Actually, it's quite heavily implied, almost explicitly referenced. I spoke about that already, at least to mention why it felt like it was fighting the narrative style, so I'll complete that thought now by saying that you never did identify who was supposed to be hearing the narrator tell this. The way it's written, that audience would still have to be with her at the end, yet that, and many points through the story, have the two alone with nobody else plausibly there. Why would someone flee into the woods with her at the end, after all, just to hear this tale's close? That would require them to care about her enough to do so, yet they never offer her any aid.

You do a good job of establishing the stakes in the story, but there's not a lot of character growth or conflict going on. For character growth, you do establish this other side of Trixie, but it's not one that evolves during the story; it was already there, so it takes place off camera prior to the action. For conflict, there is this theme of Trixie being misunderstood, but nothing's done with it. Does Trixie even realize the narrator perceives her this way, as the temperamental diva with a heart of gold? Because you're defining the conflict as the narrator's observation of Trixie's difficulties, though it's not clear how it's affecting Trixie herself.

If this fragile persona is something the narrator has invented to fool herself, and Trixie's just going to be dismissive of Ponyville's reaction to her, it's far different than if she was putting on a front that ponies took too seriously. It's unclear how Trixie actually feels. And this is the crux: Trixie has a rather quick transformation at the very end from crying to confident. It's pretty critical to the character development/conflict resolution you're trying to achieve that this is a big moment, but it passes so quickly. It's fine to have an open ending, where the reader can interpret it multiple ways. Maybe Trixie does regain her confidence. Maybe she's faking it because she sees how badly the narrator is shaken. Maybe she's putting on a brave face for her own sake. The thing is, you're trying to redefine Trixie's character, but all of it comes through the narrator's assurances. We never see anything of it from Trixie herself, and it's hard to know whether the narrator is truthful. There's no evidence either way.

The narrator doesn't speculate or assume anything so it misses out on a chance to help define their relationship, even if it doesn't which one of those options (or any other) is correct. Another part of it is that the narrator defines so much of the story as there being a self-imposed rivalry between her and Twilight, yet it's left in such vague terms, just that Twilight is such a legendary student. There weren't any direct interactions or perceived slights. The material about bullies and dropping out is a little more concrete, but when your go-away line is that the narrator is a failure, it's not a good idea to leave that failure so nebulous.

The last thing I'll say is that it can be a dangerous prospect to have so much of the story be a rehash of canon material. You view it through a different perspective, but not that much different—we see the same events from someone who interprets whether they'll help or hinder Trixie, but not spun in an "unreliable narrator" way, so it ends up being very similar to the canon presentation. I'm not sure it works in this case, but I'm not sure it doesn't work, either, so at such time as you resubmit the story, I'll probably have a different pre-reader look at it.

For now, I'll say that the audience issue, a few spots of being too blunt with character emotion, some persistent editing issues, and the lack of a struggle to define the character conflicts should be addresses, but none of those aren't that hard to handle, like some fundamental plot or character problem might be.

Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2352

>>2343

Hi, I am the writer for this story.

Let me just state it bluntly: The narrator, audience, and protagonist are all Trixie.

Your comments on the grammar and writing tics are very good and I will edit accordingly.

I'm a bit conflicted about your comments regarding the narrator, because it was a very difficult balancing act between hammering the identity of the narrator into the reader and not telling them at enough to figure it out. The majority of the commentors on fimfiction claim they figured out who the narrator was (one said he did so in the first paragraph), so I am actually not sure if I am being too obvious or too subtle!

I originally conceived the story as an interesting writing exercise; Trixie's way of speaking (not to mention her bombastic stage personality) gave me the idea that she might constantly and compulsively narrate most of her life to herself. Especially when you consider how many people in real life constantly fantasize about themselves being the protagonists of their own movie. Plus, it was supposed to be an amusing way to write a story in both first AND third person. I guess it didn't work out.

Trixie is not crazy: she's just treating herself as a larger-than life personality (something I hint at in her introspection) and she only ever interacts with the narrator in the prescence of a reflective surface (her mirror, or the water at the end), when she reminds herself of who she really is. She is constantly telling herself that she is bigger and better than she really is, because deep down inside she is in fact facing a lot of insecurities and inadequacy. Hence the marked difference between what the narrator says and how Trixie acts, even though it is always clear that they both feel the same way about everything.

Your comments on the telling vs showing of Trixie's backstory are totally valid, but I am completely stumped about how to pull a flashback without instantly giving away the fact that the narrator is Trixie. I really get though that it does make the story less compelling than if I could.

I realize that as an EQD prereader you likely have to wade through piles of stories and have little time to give my story another look, but I was kind of hoping you could take another go at my story with the narrator's identiy in mind and give me some comments on the fic before I edit it and resubmit it to EQD.

Thanks either way!
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2354

>>2352
You know, I had entertained the possibility that Trixie was talking to herself the whole time, and the only reason I ruled that out was the few instances where it really sounded like Trixie and the narrator had to be in different physical locations. There were only a couple of those, but it was enough. If not for that, I probably would have kept that possibility throughout the story. To be frank, I'm also not the best at reading between the lines, so I may well have missed something that others found obvious.

I think you could probably pull off a flashback by keeping the same tone, where you have this narrator observing her. Or if you still think it's best to handle it as exposition, try to focus more about creating a mental image.

For example, "the time we outran that timberwolf" does get at some history the two have together, but if you add in the kind of detail and emotional tone to really bring it alive, it can be just as effective as a flashback. Something like "the time we outran that timberwolf—I could feel his fetid breath oozing down my neck, but Trixie gave me a simple look that said she could handle it. And she could. I never doubted her again." You could even elaborate on the setting a bit, like how the oak branches flashed by and scratched at her coat, but she'd never felt so free as when the wolf shied away from Trixie's illusory wall of fire, and even the stream laughed at it as we leapt to the far side. There's a certain level of immersion in an anecdote that can take it beyond exposition and make it as effective as a flashback. It's making the jump from "here's what happened" to "here's what happened, and I'll bring it alive as it stokes my memory to tell it." Envision her getting lost in it as she relates the tale, then has to blink and look around to remember where she is.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2355

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>impulse decision, the kind of impulse decision//

Why repeat that?

>barely come//

Extraneous space.

>reality, it really//

Pretty redundant.

You have kind of a mixed bag with "to be" verbs. Early in chapter 1, it looks like you're using some nice active phrasing for places that would be easy to lapse into using "was" or some such. Yet there are still lots of places they show up. They're inherently boring verbs, since nothing happens. You have 58 instances of was/wasn't in this chapter alone, not to mention all the other variations on "to be." Of the unambiguous forms easy to search for, I counted an additional 48, or 106 total. That's one every 32 words, or roughly one every other sentence. That's how often something doesn't happen. It's worth trying to reduce that somewhat. Active language gives your story momentum, and you don't want it to stagnate.

>Somehow, I was pulled from the abyss; not kicking and screaming, but willingly.//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to replace it with a period, but if you did so here, the second part couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>She was silent for a brief moment, but I could tell she was desperately racking her brain for something to say.//

I was waiting to see how you would deal with this, so I didn't comment a bit earlier. And maybe you will address it, but my impression as a reader so far is that I can't believe Sunset isn't basically saying to her, "Yes, I do know what it's like. I was in your exact position." Or that Twilight hadn't already thought of that.

>after school//

You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>she set/

Another extraneous space. You might want to do a Ctrl-f for two spaces.

You're using a lot of unusual speaking verbs. There's a brief discussion in the section under "saidisms" at the top of this thread. You get halfway through the chapter before your first instance of "said."

>I have a crush on Sunset Shimmer.//

This comes out of nowhere. For a story this length, I'd have expected a slow burn of them warming up to each other. What is it she likes about Sunset? There's got to be a basis for the attraction, but I've got nothing aside from this declaration.

>the cyan girl//

>the sporty girl//
Besides being repetitive (these are very similar and occur close together), this isn't something good to do. There's an explanation at the top of this thread under "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome." But beyond that, consider how it doesn't work with the perspective. Twilight is the narrator. She knows who Dash is. Why would she refer to her in her own thoughts in terms like this? Do you think of your friends by name or by things like "the girl with glasses" and "the short boy"?

>dramatically//

If you have to tell me something is dramatic, chances are it isn't. It's like having to reassure a reader that a joke is funny.

>giggling to herself about the numbers//

Speaking of which... you should carefully consider whether it's worth explaining a joke.

>plan for getting out of plans//

Watch for close word repetition like this.

>shooting down my escape plan//

Then a third use of the word in the next sentence.

>self control//

"Self-" words are hyphenated.

>hoping that would be enough//

When you have a limited narrator (and first-person is as limited as they get), there are a class of words you shouldn't use unless they're really necessary. These are verbs related to knowledge or perception, like know, wonder, wish, hope, see, hear. It's because the narrator and the character are the same. What one knows or perceives, the other must also. You wouldn't have to say Twilight sees something. It's understood just by the fact that the narrator describes it. So don't have the narrator say Twilight hopes this. Just have the narrator hope it for her. It removes a degree of separation between the character and reader. Something like "Maybe that would be enough" expresses the hope without using the word.

>"cute.”//

Most of the chapter uses the simple-style quotation marks like you open with here, but the fancy-style ones pop up here and there. Make them consistent.

>The wind, still cold, blew against us forcefully as she sped up the hill.//

And Sunset didn't make sure she was wearing something warm enough to go on a motorcycle ride in the cold?

>her tone half-condescending, half-congratulatory//

>an entertained laugh//
Beware spelling out character moods and emotions like this. You've done well with it so far, so I'll just leave it that you might want to read the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>An awkward shuffle followed the startled The now half awake puppy slumped over by my side and brushed up against my leg.//

Something's messed up in there.

>Thankfully, the purple dog seemed content despite rudely waking him.//

Something's off with that wording. There's an active phrasing of someone waking him, but that person never appears in the sentence. It sounds like Spike woke himself. For that matter, here's another spot where the LUS doesn't fit the perspective. Twilight wouldn't refer to him as "the purple dog."

>I forgot he could talk.//

That's got to be a pretty tough thing to forget.

>I grabbed the offending slips of paper, crumpled them up, and tossed every last trace of Sunset into the trash.//

You still haven't given me the first inkling of what makes Twilight want to pursue a relationship. They've both been in a similar she-demon situation, she's been vaguely nice to Twilight, and... that's all I get. You're asking the reader to come up with his own investment in the romance.

I didn't really get this sense in the first chapter, but I'm seeing a lot of participles in chapter 2. They're a nice way to spice up writing, but moderately experienced authors tend to overuse them. They don't turn up much in everyday speech, so they stand out easily, and they can quickly get repetitive. They also have some attendant problems which are on the verge of showing up in your story. I'll point them out if I see any blatant ones.

>slipped it into frizzled mess//

Missing word.

>her voice rising with excitement//

You've also been more explicit with character emotion in this chapter. The section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread goes into more detail, but briefly, this short-circuits creating a visual image and doesn't get the reader to identify with the character.

>I nodded and uttered a confident "Sure."//

The use of "a" here makes it so this isn't exactly a quote, so it doesn't have to follow the same rules as one. You don't need to capitalize it.

>out of body//

Hyphenate that.

At some point, you switch from using fancy-style quotation marks to simple ones. Be consistent.

>It was a lot less creepy than it sounds, I promise.//

This is less her speaking to some indeterminate purpose and more her speaking to a defined audience. To whom is she making this promise? It's not the kind of thing she'd muse to herself, and this is probably a can of worms you don't want to open. When you strongly imply an audience, you invite many questions. Who is this audience? Why do they want to hear the story? Why does Twilight want to tell them? Under what circumstances is she telling them?

>rock shaped//

>heavy looking//
Hyphenate.

>behind by a wall//

Extraneous word.

>How? Don't ask.//

This really implies an audience again.

>"I'm not!" She defended//

Capitalization.

>Suuuuun~set//

A tilde's not really proper punctuation. Just describe how she says it.

>second story//

Hyphenate.

>my voice faltering in disappointment//

You really should try to avoid these "in/with/of mood" phrases. Besides doing nothing to create a visual, they're almost always redundant with some description or action already in the sentence.

>identical looking//

Hyphenate.

>I couldn't help but feel the slightest twinge of jealousy.//

Instead of telling me she's jealous, demonstrate it. Have her make a comment that puts the jealousy on display.

>Afterwards, I wandered around the backyard, admiring the decorations.//

This is what I meant about participles getting repetitive. You've ended three sentences in a row with one.

>After we were finished//

Why is Twilight including herself in the "we"? She's just leaning against the wall. Then later, she seems to be out of breath on the couch, but she hasn't done anything.

>Afterwards, I wandered around the backyard, admiring the decorations.//

Given how Marble acted in canon, I'm surprised she's willing to have anything to do with all these girls. What's making her comfortable enough that she isn't running away and hiding?

>bringing me back to a state of awareness//

When was she not in a state of awareness? She's been pretty observant so far.

>closer, hoping to get a better earful by getting closer//

Another spot of close word repetition.

>and t began//

Extraneous letter.

>neither Pinkie nor Sunset Shimmer were//

"Neither" actually takes the number of the items it references, or if they're mixed, the last one. So it's "was."

>Although, her absence made it easy to ask around for her ex-boyfriend now that I knew that she wasn't nearby.//

Another local cluster of "to be" verbs. There are 5 in this paragraph alone.

>dating." Applejack clarified//

Punctuation.

>admitted.You//

Missing space and quotation marks.

>It rarely did during my conversation with her.//

This is odd, having her sum up the conversation while it's still going on. It smacks of the whole story being something Twilight's telling someone about later on, which gets back to the audience thing, but you haven't written the story in that fashion.

>Retreating back into the safety of the party, I stopped in an isolated corner.//

Here's one of those dangers of participles I mentioned, and one that's worth keeping in mind whenever you decide to use one. They imply that actions happen at the same time, but here, she wouldn't stop until after she'd retreated. There's another example in the very next sentence (which also makes it structurally repetitive).

>Looking up, my fears from earlier were confirmed//

And there's an example of a dangling participle. You presumably mean that Twilight is looking up, but she doesn't appear in the clause. This explicitly says her fears are looking up.

>See ya, Twilight. It was great talking to you.//

I guess I'm a little surprised that Twilight isn't engaging her on being the only one who's reached out to her. This is actually the second time she's done so.

>I plugged in by earbuds//

Typo.

>I wrestled with the pajamas for a split second before//

Seems like the end of that sentence got cut off.

>rub against//

Extraneous space.

>almost eerie compared to earlier in the night it was littered with partygoers who ignored the "do not go upstairs" sign//

The phrasing is pretty awkward here.

>forcing me to trod//

Infinitives don't take a past-tense form.

>The gold accents shined//

"Shined" takes a direct object. You want "shone."

>immediately drawing my attention towards the leather-bound book//

She already started describing it. Why is her attention just now going there?

>heavily-stylized//

This is the exception to the rule: two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb don't take a hyphen.

>leaving the shining book laying in the center of the hall//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to get right.

>She mentioned me, sort of. Who else could she be talking about?//

I'm a little confused. Do you mean this all takes place after the games but before the movie's final scene? Because she encountered herself then. She looked identical. It's hard to miss, particularly for someone as smart as she is, who saw the existence of Equestria and had knowledge of all the magic. Did everyone else try to explain away this other Twilight and keep the truth from her? If you're going to depart from what happened in the movie or go with something that's not really a self-evident take on it, it helps to explain it.

>if Sunset keeps to her promise of introducing us.//

So she can't put two and two together that Princess Twilight is the other version of her, but she manages to figure out she's the one being discussed from a very vague "There's someone you have to meet. I won't say much, but let's just say she's someone after your own heart." That's simultaneously having her be rather dense and insightful.

>much needed//

Hyphenate.

>arrived to//

Usually phrased as "arrived at."

>The warmth of the house was welcomed and sorely missed//

I don't get the advantage of using passive voice here.

>I didn't feel right about leaving Sunset alone but I really needed the shower.//

You're not bad about this, but you might want to look at the section on "comma use with conjunctions" at the top of this thread.

Okay, now I see that you did wedge all this in between the movie's last two scenes. So it makes sense that Twilight's oblivious about the other Twilight, and you did make an attempt to hand-wave some memory loss as to why she doesn't remember anything about Equestria. It's still a bit odd that she assumes Sunset's journal was referring to her as the person Princess Twilight needed to meet.

>sounds of the outside world was//

Subject-verb number mismatch.

>My dog, Spike,//

Seems odd that you have to explain who he is, given that he already got a fair amount of screen time.

>Although, he seemed to gravitate//

Commas after conjunctions are rarely used correctly. This one isn't.

>po-person//

Use a dash. A hyphen is for a stutter on the same word, not switching words.

>"Very funny." Rainbow said//

Punctuation.

>on the what I used to believe was solid stone//

You don't need "the" there.

>rapid fire//

Hyphenate.

>both turned to Sunset Shimmer, who gave us both//

More close repetition.

>Is this her?//

Depending on how much you view Twilight as a grammar stickler, this would properly be "Is this she?"

>much needed//

Hyphenate.

>"Twilight is." Fluttershy joined in//

Punctuation.

>I honestly lost count on how many times//

Usually phrased as "lost count of."

>"Surely, you can't be serious," I said skeptically./

Besides being another instance of one of those telly adverbs, the choice of "skeptically" is redundant with what she said.

>"Close," Fluttershy spoke up, raising her voice just enough to be heard. "It's called Equestria."//

Except that what Sci-Twi said is she was from there. She isn't.

>"Sort of," I answered.//

Sci-Twi wouldn't seem to have enough information to say this. She doesn't even know what Sunset whispered. Did you mean this to be Sunset's line?

>Does that mean it's all true—about Equestria?//

She saw it through the portals and understood it before. It's still a bit of hand-waving to have her forget all that.

>Sure enough, Rainbow Dash had claimed shotgun//

...Which you just said a couple paragraphs ago.

>We grimaced, afraid that if we touched each other, the universe would fall apart.//

And you pretty much already said something to that effect, too.

>her voice quivering in surprise//

>genuinely surprised//
Telly and repetitive.

>one, absolute law//

Those are hierarchical adjectives (they describe different aspects of something and would sound quite awkward in the other order), so they don't need a comma between them.

>She told me that you and her... transformed.//

"You and she," if she watches her grammar.

>Just know that if you ever need help with anything, just//

That's a word many authors overuse, so be especially careful to avoid repeating it too close together. It's worth doing a Ctrl-f for it in all your chapters to see how many you use and if they're clustered anywhere.

>who can you trust//

Whom, if she's a grammarian.

>Or even worse: What if she's in love with Sunset too?//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>Just stop thinking, Twilight. You're over complicating things. Just breathe.//

As I've said, I think it's a mistake to seem like you're addressing an audience, since you didn't do the groundwork to build that up. But spots like this wouldn't fit. She's talking to herself in the moment as narration, which doesn't fit the narrator-as-storyteller.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2356

>>2355
>called, almost cringing at calling//
More word repetition.

>Looking towards the door, our minds clicked into place//

Another dangling participle.

>though, though//

Repeated word.

>She slid the napkin back, and we kept passing it back and forth, comparing our lives against each other.//

It's odd that this is going on in the middle of everyone having pizza. Are the others listening to them? Ignoring them? Interested in the conversation? It probably bears mentioning. I guess they were listening, since Dash cuts in, but the way you describe it, the conversation goes on for a while first, and it's unclear what the other girls are doing.

>my first real run in with it//

run-in

>We used our little insider chats to mostly come up with a plan for or until we managed to get a moment alone again.//

Something's jumbled there. I don't know if you intended to word it that way, but it's awfully convoluted.

>where classes had ended about an hour before//

Needs a comma to set off the dependent clause.

>gold plated//

Hyphenate.

>I know, Sweetheart//

That's just a generic term of endearment. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>Inside, Dean Cadance sat at the desk in the back of the room.//

So was the door open the whole time? Did Cadence overhear the conversation? Seems like Lemon said a few things she might prefer to keep private, but you never mentioned Twilight opening the door.

>Twilight,"Cadance//

Needs a space.

>Caught off guard, Cadance's eyes flared in surprise,//

Another dangling participle, but you've also punctuated this as a speech tag even though you have no speaking verb. You can't just tack any action to dialogue with a comma.

>desk and dropped a handful of markers onto the desk//

More close repetition.

>Sunset was the bandleader of the Rainbooms//

Dash isn't?

>tick marks that that told me//

Repeated word.

>(don't ask)//

Another spot where you're strongly implying an audience you never identify.

>that simple sequence always seemed to bring me down from//

From what?

>my parent’s reactions//

She has more than one, right?

>courtesy of the mini-fridge in Lemon's dorm//

You mean her room, right? Because one mini-fridge for the whole dorm would be woefully inadequate.

>dubbed us as, “the//

It's not quite dialogue, so you don't need the comma.

>inside a one of//

Extraneous word.

>pile of clothes//

You use the exact phrase in the sae paragraph twice, only two sentences apart.

>slow, arduous possibly friendship ruining process//

Between a phrasal adjective and one more set of coordinate adjectives that you provided a comma for, this should be: "slow, arduous, possibly friendship-ruining process."

>‘Cause//

Given your mix and match of quotation mark styles, I didn't know if this would come up, but it did. Smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward, since they think you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first.

>We competed at the Friendship Games"//

Missing your end punctuation.

>I'm ninety percent sure, she'd keel over knowing that she's half-naked next to somebody else.//

There's no reason for that comma.

>all clear//

In this usage, hyphenate it.

>The conversation seemed to end there as some of them began to announce how hungry they were, exaggerating about the last time they had eaten.//

There are lots of little places like this where you tend to sum up or gloss over things that aren't strictly essential to the plot but would go a long way toward making it feel like there's a bigger world out there than the very narrow lane around the plot. It's fine to give things a little injection of everyday life where nothing high-stakes is going on, just to add to the realism of it all. I haven't been pointing them out, but it shouldn't be hard to find.

>I just shout out//

Why are you going to present tense here?

>yes or no decision//

yes-or-no decision

>Smiling, she stopped at the door post, leaning up against the wall.//

Having lots of participles around is one thing, but multiple in the same sentence feels even more repetitive (unless it's a compound one).

>she hasn't heard of the phrase//

Why are you in present tense here?

>I whined childishly//

Odd for her to describe her own behavior that way.

>Maybe I have something stuck in my teeth, I thought.//

If you mean that as direct thought, it's customary to put it in italics or quotes (the latter is more common if you're going to put an attribution on it).

>Rarity, looked over the papers, "You said//

Why in the world is that first comma there? And you have another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>black rimmed//

>one on one//
Hyphenate.

>once in awhile//

"A while" actually needs to be two words here. You have to have a noun to serve as the object of the preposition.

>a mixture of joy and anxiousness//

I haven't been copying out many of these, but you do periodically get awfully blunt with emotion like this. This isn't something the reader can see. You make him invent his own image, if he even bothers to.

>Applejack pulled up at the side of the road//

It takes you a little while to get into this scene. All of a sudden, Twilight's getting picked up, and I don't know where they're going or why. I spent several paragraphs really confused. I think it would be a good idea to address that up front.

>one-hundred//

Hyphens don't go in the hundreds spot of numbers, unless you want to hyphenate all of "one hundred percent" as a single descriptor.

>seemingly-bountiful//

No hyphen.

>Plugging her card into the automated booth, she drove off//

Another synchronization issue with your participles.

>the other girls made general statements of excitement and plans//

This is so vague that it's meaningless. A couple of examples will speak far louder than a sweeping generality.

>rose up between the girls//

"Between" is for two. For more than that, use "among."

>"What about you, Sunset?" I asked, nudging her arm.//

Odd that this is the first time Twilight even acknowledges her, given that she's the entire reason for being there. She didn't even peek in Applejack's truck to see Sunset. I'm also surprised the girls didn't conspire to have the two ride there together. I get that Sunset might want to stay with her bike, but they're going to the same place, so it isn't that much of an issue. It's not like Sunset distrusts Applejack. Why even take the bikem though? Is Sunset anticipating the need to drive home separately?

>Maybe start off one something more gentle//

That wording is off.

>four person//

Hyphenate.

>lack of//

Extraneous space. And I'm nt sure what her issue is with the lack of restraints. You're keeping with a close Earth analog here, and ride operators aren't going to be happy about taking risks. If there are no restraints, it's likely because the rides are safe and accidents are rare. Otherwise, they're needlessly opening themselves up to lawsuits. I'm surprised someone as logical as Twilight doesn't figure that out.

>about 72.7 percent of the time on a total of eleven separate rides//

Why would she quote it this way instead of the much simpler "8 times out of 11"?

>out of place//

Hyphenate.

>Although,//

No grammatical reason for that comma to be there. They aren't for dramatic pauses.

>as we walked out the shop//

Missing word.

I'm seeing clusters of participial phrases again in this chapter. Right around where Twilight's buying a bunch of chocolate, you have 6 in the last 5 paragraphs of the scene.

>clearly disappointed//

If it's so clear, why don't I get to see it for myself?

>Your ride vehicle will begin moving momentarily.//

>The ride came to an abrupt halt//
This is seemingly contradictory. I see later what you mean, but it's not the kind of thing you want to have the reader unsure of. And even after the meaning is clear, it's odd to have the announcement come before the ride actually stops.

>carefully-designed//

No hyphen.

>by the way//

Another example of something that implies an audience.

>I let out a surprised gasp at the sudden change//

See, a lot of these emotion words you use aren't even necessary. For some, they should be replaced with a description of how the character looks or acts, but here, the gasp already conntes surprise. "Sudden" is another word that should be used sparingly. You want the narration to have it happen suddenly, not have to tell th reader it was sudden. It's like telling the reader that a joke was funny. If you have to say so, you're probably not doing it right.

>curious about the change//

You just referred to "the change" in the previous paragraph.

>Ignoring statement//

Missing word.

>one-hundred//

That's not a hyphenated term. Hyphens only go between the tens and ones places (between the last two of each group of three digits when written numerically).

>far." Sunset started//

Punctuation.

>purposefully droning on about nothing//

As phrased, this is Sunset's knowledge of what she's doing, not Twilight's interpretation of such. Careful you don't change perspective like that.

>The pointless small talk was welcomed//

In that phrasing, you'd normally just say "welcome."

>fear. the height//

I'm not sure what you meant to do here, but there's something wrong. You could capitalize, but the latter part wouldn't stand well as a fragment. You could use a comma to make the latter part an appositive. But since you're clarifying a point, a colon is probably most appropriate.

>holding on to the safety bar//

>holding onto her//
Watch the onto/on to inconsistency.

>front of the line//

Hyphenate.

>rainbow haired//

Hyphenate. But why would Twilight refer to Dash like this? She knows her name.

>broken down//

Hyphenate.

>intense, yet trivial//

Either pair the comma with one after "yet trivial" or don't use any.

>rainbow haired girl//

>curly haired girl's//
More of these (unhyphenated) descriptors that aren't really reasonable for Twilight to use.

>the image of Sunset and I//

People make this mistake all the time because they're deathly afraid of misusing "me," but it's actually the right choice here. "Sunset and I" is nominative case, same as "we." "Sunset and me" is objective case, same as "us." Which sounds right, "the image of we" or "the image of us"?

>"Okay," I said back stiffly, hanging up the phone.//

Another spot of iffy participle synchronization.

>simple; all it took was a simple//

Watch that repetition.

>This was my chance to impress Sunset Shimmer, and I had to make it count.//

Wouldn't this make her excited? She's not delivering the line as if she is.

>amount of stuffed animals//

"Amount" is for collective quantities, like money. For individual items, use "number."

>weighed down//

You'd usually see this as "weighted down."

>I sung my legs idly//

Sounds like a lovely song.

>I offered some to Sunset, who accepted it unquestioningly.//

Here's another spot where you gloss over a character interaction that would have added some authenticity to the story, especially considering how important it would be to Twilight.

>They lie//

Well then how did Twilight know when to meet them at the line? She had an incredible premonition to show up 30 minutes late?

>I bent over a decorative garden//

I guess you mean this figuratively? It's confusing.

>Though, I wouldn't feel right if it was just you on your own.//

No reason for a comma there. And Rarity isn't concerned Twilight might puke in her car?

>"It's fine," I needed to stop saying that.//

There's no speaking verb in your attribution.

>where Sunset's bike was tied to//

The "to" doesn't parse there.

>bungee cords//

That's not going to hold something as heavy as a motorcycle in place. You'd need some chains or tie-down straps.

>helped her roll the bike downward//

Not sure why you're repeating "helped" here. And is a motorcycle ride really the wisest thing for someone who's nauseated?

>After nearly crying on the Iron Pegasus, Sunset's bike wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it was//

Sunset's bike cried on the roller coaster?

>knocking off my contacts//

Repeated use of "knocking," plus wouldn't you knock contacts out?

>lying down on a cot//

If she's been unconscious, she's probably in something more substantial than a cot.

>an audible sigh//

That's already self-evident. If it weren't audible, she wouldn't have heard it.

>feeling the cold of my glasses//

This is a dangling participle. It describes Twilight, but she's not in the sentence. You're saying her vision felt the cold.

>Though, I probably came off as insane//

No reason to have that comma.

>"Twilight, I..." Sunset trailed off.//

You don't need to narrate trailing off (or getting cut off, for that matter), when it's already obvious from the punctuation.

>what I have been doing//

That doesn't really fit with a past-tense narration.

>Although, you're the one who took the most damage//

You really like putting commas after those conjunctions.

>your parents are coming in about half an hour//

What kept them? It's kind of hard to believe they'd take so long.

>it's all fine, I think.//

>
>I had no idea what to think.//
That's seemingly contradictory. I could see deriving some meaning from it, like she's self-aware of the contradiction, but then the trick is to make it obvious, like having her use emphasis to call attention to the repetition.

>much needed//

Hyphenate.

Well, I hope you've stuck with me to the end. I liked this story, and I'd like to see it succeed, but there are a few things holding it back. First, the good, though. It's refreshing to see the way you ended the story. Yeah it's obvious sequel bait, but when most people do that, it's not necessarily at a good stopping point in the story. This one comes to a nice close, and Sunset does actually turn her down. So there is a result, just one that could change later. I also appreciate the slow burn of this relationship. You took your time having Twilight work her way up to asking Sunset out instead of blasting through all this in a single day.

The main point against it is that this good pacing doesn't come about until after Twilight's fallen in love with Sunset, and that's the part that really gets the reader on board. And it didn't really work for me. Twilight just decides it's love, and I was never even convinced of it being "like" before that. I don't see a basis for her being in love. She never says what she likes about Sunset, what each one would bring to and take away from a relationship, what things Sunset has done that endeared her to Twilight. I just have to take the narrator's word for it, which is made even worse by the fact that the narrator is Twilight. That should give me a front-row seat to why Twilight cares about her, but it's never shown. So if you can get me on board with believing there's a true love interest here and not just her flipping on the love switch because it's necessary for the plot, you'll be most of the way there. A few months ago, Aragon wrote up a good blog post about writing convincing relationships, and it might help you to read it.

Other than that, the issues should be obvious from what things I had to mention multiple times. There are places where the story stagnates because of a cluster of "to be verbs," and you get very blunt with the emotions at times, outright telling me how a character feels instead of making the character look and act as if she feels that way. You also have this quirk of Twilight seemingly address an audience who is never identified. It feels like you have her speaking to the reader, yet you don't make the reader a party to the action or someone she's regaling with her tale after the fact, so you haven't given the audience a reason to be there. Frankly, it'd be far easier to cut out or reword all these places so you don't address a listener anymore. Then Twilight's basically talking to herself, which works fine.

For more mechanical/stylistic things, there were the abundance of unusual speaking verbs and the "lavender unicorn"-type descriptors that don't fit the narrative perspective.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2357

I normally put summaries at the end, but I want to get it out of the way up front here, because I don't want you to get discouraged. This was a great idea for a story, and the writing quality is good. You've got the talent to get this posted, but there are a few things holding it back, things that come with experience, when you take a deeper look at how to communicate with the reader. What better time to learn than the present? So I've given you some pretty extensive feedback on those few things: character perspective, type of narration, depiction of emotion, and avoiding repetitive structure. I've pulled out examples of each, but I wasn't exhaustive. They should be enough to help you scan the story for the rest. I'd love to see this story come back in great shape, since there's a lovely message here, and it's a wonderful character moment. It's fine if it takes a couple of iterations to get it there; I'll help you through the process.

Immediately, there's a big disconnect in the narrative voice. It's something a little more advanced, so I'm not surprised it hasn't turned readers off to the story. You have lots of flowery phrasing and difficult word choice, but it's at odds with how you're narrating it. To illustrate, here are a few excerpts.

>Inhale...//

This takes a conversational tone. When a narrator does something that's informal and sounds more like speech (including asking questions, making exclamations, adding emphasis, trailing off, and getting interrupted), it tends to make it a limited narrator. That means the narrator is understood to be one of the characters. Depending on how personal a voice you give it, it can even be barely removed from a first-person narrator. As Scootaloo is the only characters present, and this is consistent with what her thought process could be here, you're making her the perspective character.

>into a delicious stretch//

Here, you're having the narrator express a character's opinion as if it's his own. You do so elsewhere, too, as in "a familiar light blue mare." When you have the character's thoughts and opinions presented as direct narration, as opposed to having the narrator attribute them to the character explicitly*, it further cements that you're using a limited narrator.

*This can be done through making the thought a quote ("What a delicious stretch!" Scootaloo thought.) or saying it's her opinion ("into what felt like a particularly delicious stretch to her").

So you're using a limited narrator, who is Scootaloo. That means the narration itself should sound like things Scootaloo might think to herself or say out loud. It ought to match her voice, personality, intelligence level, personality, and vocabulary. So when you've chosen Scootaloo as your narrator, yet you have her using very sophisticated sentence structures (A wisp of a cloud swam over the horizon, a growing imperfection in the previously unmarred emptiness of the sky as it drew nearer.) and word choices like "supine" and "unmarred," it doesn't quite fit. In short, your narrator is Scootaloo, but she doesn't sound like Scootaloo.

So what to do about that? It depends on what you want your narrator to be. If you want to use a limited narrator, then it needs to sound believable that the narration is Scootaloo's internal monologue. That means adapting the tone and vocabulary to something appropriate for her. Alternatively, you could go for an omniscient narrator, and then you can have it be as fancy as you like. You just have to divorce the character from the narrator, so that the narration contains no opinions, terms of subjective judgment, or speech affectations. It sticks to facts and attributes any opinions to the characters. That may be the easier way to go, since your story doesn't contain that many elements that are that far into a very subjective narrator. In fact, you probably would need more such things if you wanted a limited narrator; it's a good idea to remind the reader who holds the limited perspective every couple of paragraphs if possible. Actually, as I read deeper and deeper into the story, you tend more toward a limited narrator.

>turning her back to the orange filly//

Here's another thing to beware of if you're going to use a limited narrator. Scootaloo wouldn't refer to herself as "the orange filly." Be careful that you refer to or describe characters in a way that's plausible for the perspective.

Next issue: you're awfully blunt with character emotions at times. Avoid naming emotions directly as much as you can. Here are some examples of that:

>threateningly//

>gleeful smile//
>smug smirk//
>ears folding back in confusion//
>with disappointment//
>amused smile//
>wings fluttering anxiously//
>sagged in defeat//
That's just from the first screen or so. A lot of these would be fine by just cutting out the emotion word. A smirk already connotes smugness. You're fine leaving it at that. Same with the "amused smile" and the "wings fluttering anxiously." Just remove the emotion word, and it works fine. This is almost always true of the "in/with/of mood" phrasings; they're redundant with an action already in the sentence the vast majority of the time. The one that often requires more rephrasing is the -ly adverbs.

Here's the reasoning behind avoiding these. When you spell out emotions, you don't get the reader to visualize anything, figure anything out, or identify with the character, and force a conclusion on him. In real life, you don't just know someone is happy; you deduce it from how the person behaves and looks. It makes your writing feel more authentic when you mirror that process. It's the same with acting. Think about how an actor gets you to believe his character is happy. He might smile, have a spring in his step, bright eyes, gesture more emphatically when speaking, laugh. These are all things an outside observer would use to determine he was happy, and it creates a vivid mental image. For the most part, you ought to present written characters the same way.

Another issue: structural repetition. This is a common problem for writers starting to gain much experience. They latch onto certain elements, like participial phrases, absolute phrases, and "as" clauses, since they're descriptive and sound sophisticated, but they're also very unusual in everyday speech, so they stand out easily, and it doesn't take many to sound repetitive. I'll pull out ones you use in the first screen, the same length I scanned for the blunt emotional content.

>the early afternoon sun inching across fields of blue//

>the slight breeze biting//
>granted by the sun's rays//
>as it drew nearer//
>as it passed over the park//
>as the tuft of cirrus momentarily obscured the sun//
>continuing to drift on out of view moments later//
>corners of her mouth drawn downward in a slight frown//
>clasping her hooves behind her head//
>her unfocused gaze never leaving the sky//
>as she shifted//
>aching for use//
>trotting towards her with her teeth bared threateningly//
>as she rolled over onto her belly//
>sliding forward into a delicious stretch//
>leaving a smug smirk in its wake//
>turning her back to the orange filly//
>a familiar device clutched in her forehooves//
>turning to peer over her shoulder//
>her ears folding back in confusion//
>wings fluttering anxiously//
>grinning down at the filly//
>as she idly pawed the ground//
>letting out a whisper of a sigh//
>raising her hoof to ruffle Scootaloo's messy mane//

It's not that you use these structures at all; it's how often you use them. Like I said, the more unusual something is, the more it stands out. You wouldn't bat an eye at seeing "the" four times in a single sentence, but you'd definitely remember seeing "ventriloquist" twice on an entire page. It helps if you try to avoid using more than one of the same kind of these in a single sentence, avoid having a cluster of the same kind (3 in a paragraph, for example), or always using them in the same position in the sentence (consistently at the end, consistently after a speaking verb, etc.).

>Taking a moment to steady herself, she nearly toppled over in surprise//

There are certain attendant problems with participial phrases in particular that you're likely to run into when you have so many. Here's one: they imply concurrent action, but these sound more like actions that'd happen one after the other. Beware synchronizing actions that wouldn't reasonably happen at the same time.

>Hopping back onto her own scooter, Scootaloo looked over at Rainbow, biting her lip for a moment as she considered how best to continue. //

Here's an example of one where it actually is reasonable for all that stuff to happen simultaneously, but you're synchronizing 4 actions, which is asking the reader to keep track of a lot. It could probably stand to be broken over two sentences. Well, maybe it's a little more reasonable to have the "considered" take place after the "looked."

>Slowing to a standstill, she floated back down to ground level//

Another one where the actions likely occur in sequence, not at the same time.

You have a few slips in perspective as well. The early story takes Scootaloo's perspective, when it takes one at all, as I already went into while talking about limited narration. The narrator's only expressed her opinions and impressions, and for some of it, she was the only one present. Then we get this:

>Rainbow opened her mouth to insist that she most definitely did not need a helmet, but after a moment it fell shut again, morphing into a small smile.//

This would require Scootaloo to read Dash's mind, since it doesn't say Scootaloo figured this out from Dash's behavior or something. It's just stated as a fact, so it's from Dash's perspective. If you reworded it to sound like an omniscient narrator, fine—they can dip into different characters' heads at will. But for a limited narrator, it's a good idea only to switch perspectives when necessary, like there's vital information that only another character can express. That doesn't happen too often it's usually best to switch perspectives only at scene breaks. Take this one: as I said, it's possible to have Scootaloo figure out Dash is thinking this rather than show it from Dash's head. It just jerks the reader around if limited perspectives change too often or too abruptly.

>Scootaloo did her best to hold back a laugh//

And just a couple sentences later, you're back in Scootaloo's head; only she would know it was her "best" effort.

>Besides, Rainbow Dash had to be a fast learner//

And definitely in Scootaloo's perspective here. The narrator is expressing an opinion (had to be) of Scootaloo's.

>much to Rainbow's amusement//

You're still in Scootaloo's perspective. So what's her evidence of this?

>She rolled her hoof in the air, searching for the most scientifically accurate synonym she knew.//

And here, you're pretty much blatantly contradicting all that fancy language you implied was Scootaloo's internal thought process early in the story.

>her face growing red//

Another fine point of perspective. How would Scootaloo know this? She can't see her own face. She could feel it growing warm and maybe conclude blushing from it, but that's not how you've phrased things.

>The blue pegasus//

It's clear enough Scootaloo wouldn't refer to herself using one of these descriptors, but why Dash either? She knows Dash's name, and this kind of thing doesn't help differentiate a crowd of characters, since Dash is the only other one present.
>The pegasus froze//
And that one's just ambiguous. They're both pegasi.

>The experience wasn't too unlike pushing clouds while sitting or laying down on top of them//

Now you're in Dash's head. It expresses an opinion, and since Scootaloo has never pushed clouds around, this couldn't be her experience she's relating.

>your..." Scootaloo trailed off//

It's not necessary to narrate trailin off when it's already evident from the punctuation.

>abrupt interruption//

Aren't interruptions abrupt by default?

>Scootaloo's muffled sobs wracked both their frames//

Dial this back. You don't want to get melodramatic. Where emotion is concerned, less is often more. If you go over the top, you just make it look like a shameless grab for the reader's heartstrings, not to mention less realistic.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2363

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

This may not be an accurate portrayal of the overall product, but the early impression you give is that your story will be very structurally repetitive. You have sentence after sentence that starts with the subject. I counted about 6 non-dialogue sentences in the first 6 paragraphs that started with anything but the subject. While simpler sentences will probably still do your heavy lifting, a little variety helps break that up. You already have a few sentences that start with a participle (which is often considered a weak sentence opener, by the way) or a prepositional phrase, so have a few more where you throw an adverb or a dependent clause up front.

The next thing that quickly stands out is how often you're very blunt with character emotion. When you say a character is happy, you're making a conclusion for the reader, and you're not painting much of a visual image. If instead you say he has a bounce to his step and he's smiling, I now have a mental picture of him that leads me to the conclusion you want. I get to th same place either way, but the latter is more vivid and gets me to think about the character more. It's also closer to how we read people in real life, by interpreting behavioral cues. Here are a few early examples of where you just tell me how a character feels instead of demonstrating it:

>Overwhelming despair filled her//

>in excitement//
>in horror//
>in annoyance//
>disapproving look//
>in thought//
>Without surprise//
>happily//

It's very common to have problems with too many adverbs in this regard, but it's clear your weakness is these "in/with/of mood" type of phrases. These ones are almost always redundant with information already in the sentence.

Next, there are a few perspective issues. The narrator seems to be a limited one in Aether's perspective, as he relates her opinion on her behalf in places. It also takes on a conversational tone (like getting cut off: "She ran towards the light full force and jumped through the barrier of fire, and—"), which isn't something an omniscient narrator would do. So you want to keep the narration to things Aether could know or perceive, and you want it to sound like it matches her voicing, personality, and vocabulary. Some things tend to break that. There are descriptors like "the filly" that we term Lavender Unicorn Syndrome (LUS), and there are good reasons for mostly avoiding those in your writing. But the larger point here is that they don't make sense for this narrator, unless that's the only way she'd know to refer to a character. Surely she wouldn't think of herself as "the pegasus" as you have her doing. Nor would she refer to her mother or anyone she knows well through a similar phrasing. People just don't do that. Besides it being bad writing practice, it's at least plausible for an omniscient narrator, but it rarely makes sense for a limited one.

By chapter 2, the narration more often sounds omniscient, so I don't know which one you're trying to use. If you want limited, it's a good idea to check in with some subjective or conversational language every couple paragraphs at least to remind the reader of it.

>KKCCHHT!//

It's pretty off-putting to have sound effects in narration like this. They can play alright in a comedy or if you're going for a whimsical tone, but they don't work well with a serious tone. Just describe the sound.

Similarly, you're trying to indicate something by putting a tilde in speech, but I have no idea what. There's no consensus on what that means. Just describe how they say these things.

It's probably better to demark the flashback as a separate scene. At first, the reversal from italics=thought to italics=flashback gets a bit confusing, but it's also irritating to read long italicized passages.

There are some minor editing things. I'll point out a few that may be tougher to spot. For one, your ellipsis format is inconsistent.

>Breaking into a gallop, the patch of light before her grew dimmer and dimmer//

Dangling participle. Presumably, Aether is the one galloping, but she doesn't appear in the clause. This says the light broke into a gallop.

>now rocky//

When you have a multi-word modifier preceding what it describes (not as a predicate adjective, for example), hyphenate it, unless it's a two-word phrase starting with an -ly adverb.

>she was nearly bouncing at this point in excitement.//

The lack of capitalization suggests you're trying to use this as a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb. The "at this point" also makes the narrator rather self-aware.

>reigned in//

reined

The indentation in chapter 2 is uneven.

The beginning of chapter 3 is already going to rub readers the wrong way. In the first two sentences, you hit me with "somnial" and "aphotic." There's a little context as to what the former might mean, but zero on the latter. You don't want to throw words at the reader he's unlikely to know, unless you clue him in to what they likely mean. I haven't a inkling on "aphotic," unless I try to break it down by roots, and I'm just not going to invest that kind of time in decoding fanfiction. The vast majority of readers will either move on without knowing what you've said or break from your story to look it up. Neither is a good thing.

Then in the second paragraph, you have three separate "begin" verbs. Besides being repetitive, these are rarely necessary. Every given action begins. It's only worth pointing that out when it's noteworthy for some reason, like it's an abrupt change or the action never finishes.

>hurdling into the cliff face//

While it's possible you meant that word choice, "hurtling" is more likely.

>‽//

You've used this as both a single mark and separate ones. Be consistent.

>Seeing the look in NightWing's eyes, Aether's didn't doubt them//

I'm not sure what the possessive "Aether's" is referencing. By grammatical convention, her eyes, but then it's very weird to have her eyes make a judgment of doubt.

>hoard//

You've confused this with its homophone, horde.

>Blood spattered the bat's battleclaws as they tore the pegasi from the sky.//

Sounds like you're talking about more than one bat, but you're using a singular possessive.

>It could never repair.//

It could never repair what?

>“Wait—” Aether called out, “—I'm ready to eat.”//

Don't end a narrative aside with a comma. You wouldn't do so without the quotation marks there, and they don't change anything,

>pain in her hoof jerked her from her concentration, leaving her painfully//

You don't say.

>How am I supposed to follow that, she wondered.//

There are a number of these thoughts that are apparently questions yet have no question marks.

>[/i]“Keep your wings open,” retorted her own voice.[/i]//

I'm guessing you only meant to have the quote in italics.

>she image came to mind//

Typo.

>felt it's lift again//

Its/it's confusion.

Now that Aether has escaped, let me go back to Canary. She certainly could have been playing a part, but her appearance in the prison doesn't make sense. She's surprised Aehter reacts to her the way she does, which is baffling, unless Canary just has no idea how regular ponies interact socially. She just casually says she's not a friend as if it would never have occurred to her otherwise, but how can she not know that? Changelings live off those kinds of emotions, so how did she fail to perceive it? She just kind of comes and goes with no hint of any motivation, almost that she's oblivious about the whole thing.

Aether's really taking to this newfound power with little preamble, too. She doesn't do much to question it, and it's incredibly convenient from a plot standpoint that it's going to get her out of this prison where a much more complex plan would normally be needed. It's bordering on a deus ex machina.

>Come back!!

You don't need double punctuation. One is plenty.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2366

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the legendary unicorn general, General (once Princess) Platinum//

That's a pretty redundant use of "general."

>( 24//

Extraneous space.

>once pristine//

You're using that whole phrase as a single descriptor for "lands," so hyphenate it.

>the unicorns were lead into the war//

The past tense is "led."

>Her Majesty//

I know they use both interchangeably on the show, so it depends on how techincal you want to be, but "Your Majesty" is the proper term of address for a queen. For a princess, it's "Your Highness."

>earth pony armies//

Not sure why you capitalized the tribes the first time you used them but not since.

>an agreement was settled upon: The//

Only capitalize after a colon if the clarification/definition/example it refers to takes multiple sentences.

>aside for the fact//

Usually phrased as "aside from."

>to beyond//

Odd to have both of these words. You don't need the "to."

>( Contrary to popular belief. )//

Why do you have spaces inside the parentheses?

>Yeah, right. If only they knew the truth...//

It's really strange to have this here. It's obviously in a perspective, but we have no idea whose.

>( a//

You really have this odd thing going with spaces on the insides of parentheses.

>Sparkle," The golden hued pony replied//

Capitalization, missing hyphen, and I'll refer you to the discussion on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome at the top of this thread as to why descriptors like this aren't generally desirable.

>2 am in the morning//

As opposed to 2 am in the afternoon?

>protégés//

If you want to be really technical, they're female, so they're protégées.

>were still awake in their respective beds across each other//

Either they can stretch really far, or you mean "across from each other."

>every time she tries to use her magic/

No reason to switch to present tense here.

>Thirteen years worth of failures//

That phrasing is possessive: Thirteen years' worth of failures.

>Its a wonder//

Its/it's confusion.

>Twilight's father, Captain Night Light//

You need another comma on the other side of the appositive.

>it was getting absolutely sickening//

You're not attributing this opinion to a character explicitly, leaving it as the narrator's opinion. That brings you into the realm of a limited narrator, where the narrator speaks on one of the characters' behalf. Until now, your narration has felt largely omniscient, holding to facts and using those LUS-type descriptors that often don't work with a limited narrator. Just pointing this out so far as a starting point, as I suspect the narrative voice will become an issue at some point.

>Celestia 's//

Another extraneous space. Suffice it to say you need to sweep the story for these. I won't mark any more.

>And how did Twilight Sparkle know about this? No, Sunset did not tell her anything.//

Now you're taking a conversational tone, which further cements that you have a limited narrator.

>the one who many theorised that her father had bought his way//

Ugh, it's not worth the detailed explanation. Here's the correct version: the one whom many theorised her father had bought her way

>"Fine!" She had replied//

Capitalization.

>Or so her trusty golden grandfather clock told her.//

There's been a scene break, so there's no reason for me to assume the perspective character is the same. Yet you go through five uses of "she" or "her" before identifying the character as Twilight. There's no reason I can see to obscure that, so why are you holding it as a reveal?

>Her eyes snapped opened suddenly, wide awake.//

You're missing some line breaks between these paragraphs. And here, you're saying her eyes were wide awake.

>Sprinting to Sunset's chifferobe, she practically tore the top drawer out telekinetically//

Note that participial phrases mean things happen simultaneously, but it's more reasonable she didn't open the drawer until after she'd sprinted there.

>intricate binds//

Depending on your meaning, the noun form would be "bonds" or "bindings" (the latter is more likely for magical applications).

And back to my continuing discussion of narrative voice. The amount of quoted thought you're using tends to skew toward omniscient narration, since a limited narrator could simply express the thought instead of presenting it as a quote. There are exceptions, but they're pretty uncommon.

>Oh, well, it could have gone worse.//

Now the narrator is expressing Twilight's direct thought as if his own. Definitely a limited narrator.

>"May I know how you got here?" The princess asked//

Capitalization. There's a section on capitalization and punctuation of dialogue at the top of this thread.

>evenly at Twilight's frightened violet ones//

Given that you're (intermittently) using Twilight as your perspective character, why would she describe her own eye color?

>it would have worked perfectly."//

When one paragraph ends in dialogue and the next picks right up with more dialogue by the same speaker, it's customary to leave the closing quotation marks off the end of the first paragraph.

>Twilight's mind ceased to function after the words 'my faithful student'//

Missing end punctuation.

>a blush beginning to show through her lavender fur//

Again with the perspective. How could Twilight see this? It's not that she couldn't know she was blushing, but this isn't the evidence she'd have. Unless she had a mirror handy, I guess.

>seemingly continuing to organise the parchment scrolls on her desk//

Still getting signs of this being a limited narrator, since the "seemingly" clearly couches this as Twilight's impression.

>(Which was partly Sunset's own fault for not waking Twilight up)//

You're just making that an aside in the sentence. There's no reason to capitalize it.

>she crumbled the scroll containing her practically useless schedule, tossing it randomly behind her//

Another spot where a participial phrase makes things happen simultaneously that shouldn't.

>jaggedly-cut//

This is the exception to hyphenation: two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb don't take a hyphen, since there's no ambiguity in the hierarchy of modifiers.

>looked like it was done in a spiralling curl, except that it looked like it//

Try to avoid close repetition of words or phrases like this.

>To summarise this, there was an unusually fancy cleaner standing in her house, accusing her of littering.//

Now you're making the narrator self-aware of the narration, which means they're either writing this stuff down or they have an audience. You haven't established either yet, and you really shouldn't wait until well into the story to do so. It'd be far simpler to avoid doing this kind of thing altogether.

>exasperated//

Don't just tell me how a character feels. Describe her actions and appearance such that I'll conclude exasperation on my own. You should avoid using emotion words, for the most part.

>spick//

That's a rather unfortunate racial epithet. You want "spic."

>the unicorn proceeded//

That's not a speaking verb, but you're trying to use it as an attribution.

>care– she//

If you're using en dashes, put a space on both sides; with em dashes, don't use spaces.

>the unicorn asked//

"Asked" would only apply to the first sentence, not the entire quote.

>face turning even more purple than it usually was//

How can she see her own face to know this? By now, you've gone to a pretty consistently limited narrator in Twilight's perspective.

>"I SAID GET OUT, WHOEVER-THE-HELL-YOU-ARE!" "//

Extraneous quotation marks.

>haughty trotting//

What makes it sound haughty? I'm at a loss.

>longest standing//

Hyphenate.

>Removing herself from the wall, Twilight's heart//

This says Twilight's heart removed herself from the wall.

>'Tartarus' (Though, she had stopped using 'Tartarus' after Sunset laughed at her pronunciation.)//

Capitalization again, plus the period only goes inside the parentheses if the parenthetical element isn't inside another sentence.

>only Celestia herself can produce//

Another odd shift to present tense.

>that all she wanted for it is to be over//

And again, plus this is just awkwardly phrased.

>chifferobe//

Is that an acceptable British spelling? The only one listed in Webster's is "chifforobe."

>"Sweetie?" she called. "SWEETIE!"//

This is the first line of a scene. Who's "she"? Pronouns work by antecedent, so it's always strange to see them used before some other kind of noun reference, even a vague one like "the mare." But you're not trying to obscure Rarity's identity in any way, so I don't see the point in putting off identifying her.

>early...too//

There are a few acceptable ways to format ellipses, but unless one starts a sentence, the one that ends up playing best with the typesetting is to leave a space after it.

>causing rainwater the drip//

Typo.

Here in chapter 3 (as numbered by FiMFiction, not as numbered in the titles), you're really using a ton of participial phrases. These are things authors of intermediate experience tend to overuse, since they sound descriptive and sophisticated, but they're also uncommon in everyday speech, so they stand out easly and get repetitive. There's a cluster of them right here:
>Satisfaction glowing in her eyes// (Actually, that's an absolute phrase, but it's another kind of participial structure.)
>Sighing//
>staring at their house//
>leaning sadly to the right//
>causing rainwater the drip slowly down to their equally soggy wooden floorboards//
>Rolling up her uniform//
>aiming her bright green eyes at Rarity//
>annoyance creeping into her tone// (another absolute phrase)
>grinning in excitement//
>Heaving a sigh//
>Trying to keep her hoofsteps low and soft//
>filled to the brim with shards of glass and wooden chips//
>indicating that it was "RARITYS CHAM BOCKS"//
>filled with at least ten basic charms//
>Picking out a cracked silver of tinted glass//
>an arcane circle spiralling out, turning it into a talisman// (absolute phrase)
>Stalking slowly back to her sister//
In a span of 27 sentences here, you have 17 of them. That's a lot. You want the reader remembering the story, not that he saw a ton of similar phrasings. It helps to reduce the number of them overall, to around one every 2 or 3 sentences at most. It's also a good idea to avoid putting two of the same type in a single sentence, and keep an eye out for putting them in different positions in the sentence. You actually do okay on that front—just watch out for frequently ending sentences with them or frequently placing one after a speech tag—but for what it's worth, John Gardner notes them as a weak way to begin a sentence in his The Art of Fiction.

>Twilight thought for the hundredth time//

It's usually not a good idea to break paragraphs between a quote and its attribution, essentially in the middle of a sentence.

>aubergine//

Most readers will have no idea what this means, and this mention contains zero context for making a good guess at it. This means that the majority of readers will either get nothing from this and move on or stop reading your story to look it up. Neither of those is good.

>spell." Twilight replied//

Punctuation.

>and she can smell the fresh//

You seem to have trouble casting this verb in a past-tense narration. Use "could."

>spend//

Present tense again.

>thrashing//

This would be quite the emotional moment for her, but her limited narration sounds rather bland.

>1 a.m//

You went without periods the last time you used this format. And if you're going to use them, you need two.

>golden eyes shifting with curiosity//

Another oddity of perspective. Lyra holds the viewpoint, so why would she comment on her own eye color? This is a really external view of her as well, and that blunt "with curiosity," besides being telly, also seems an odd conclusion for her to make about herself—judging curiosity from her expression instead of her internal impression.

>wild grin//

Kind of repetitive with the recent "wildly."

>ohnonono.But//

Missing space.

>Scrambling up onto her hooves, Lyra ignored the sharp, stabbing pain racing up and down her body, instead choosing to glare at the giggling figure of Twilight, focusing hard on ignoring her dizziness and bright yellow dots all swirling around and around her head.//

Here's another issue participles often cause: misplaced modifiers. The "focusing hard" one is located right with "Twilight," so it would seem to describe her, but it's supposed to describe Lyra.

>she squinted at Twilight//

Another non-speaking action used as an attribution.

>Turning, she immediately face-planted the ground, smashing her muzzle inwards. Howling, she felt herself rolling over, watching vague, colourful spots forming in her eyes//

Wow. Four participles in just two sentences. And you usually face-plant "on" the ground.

>at Twilight's doorsteps//

Usually, that's rendered as singular.

I'm suffering from a little tonal dissonance here. The sun dying sure seems like a serious subject, and your genre tags promise only adventure and dark, but there's an awful lot of comedy so far. In fact, it seems like it's more comedy than anything else.

>With a pair of terribly constricted pupils//

How can she see them to know? You're in her perspective.

>Rarity could only blink strangely at the lavender-coated unicorn//

It's really weird to segue into the flashback from Twilight's perspective but back out in Rarity's. It leaves things feeling disjointed.

>Upon saying then//

Something's off in that wording.

>"Never mind," –Twilight levitated the book impatiently, gaining back her usual air and saving her from another awkward silence – "You//

That's not really the right format. The comma-and-dash combo constitutes redundant punctuation, and an aside, by nature, isn't likely to come back into a capitalized quote.

>Please, do shut up Twilight.//

Without a comma for direct address, she's saying that someone needs to confine Twilight or make her be quiet.

I'm colorblind, so your magical aura formatting is lost on me.

>so..." –Twilight//

Having these kinds of punctuation juxtaposed is contradictory. They mean opposite things.

>her stomach's contents emptied itself//

The "itself" would seem to refer to the stomach, but the only noun the reflexive pronoun could refer to is "contents," which has a plural/singular mismatch.

>tired looking//

Hyphenate.

>many a tired looking unicorn were//

Subject-verb number mismatch: unicorn were.

>fancy looking//

That would also need a hyphen, but it's pretty repetitive to use the same phrasing you did earlier in the same sentence.

>break in//

That's a hyphenated term, even as a noun.

>plain looking//

Now it's really getting repetitive.

>outside, waving slowly in the brisk winds outside//

Yeah, I don't know what flipped on the repetition switch, but it's full blast early in this chapter.

>tick filled//

Hyphenate.

>familiar looking//

>sloppy looking//
At least this is the last of these phrasings in the chapter, but all 5 of them occur in the first 7 paragraphs.

>hay bacon//

This just strikes me as odd. To have to qualify it as "hay" bacon, that not only implies that just plain old bacon is a thing, but that it's the most prevalent thing.

>not." – Armour's pupils shrunk slightly. – "Keep//

Another spot where you've really messed up the aside formatting.

>ponies which dealt mostly in defensive strategies and barrier spells//

For sentient creatures, you're generally going to use "who" in place of "that," and you'll always use it in place of "which."

>lot. Thankfully//

Extraneous space.

>as focused her gaze on Shining's nervous expression//

Missing word.

I'm also seeing a whole lot of blatant emotional mentions in this chapter, but I'm far enough in that you should get the picture by now, and I haven't been marking them for a while.

>if they're forced//

That's only a contraction for "they are," not "they were," so you're out of tense.

>the three of them are//

Well, now I'm not sure the previous one was inadvertent. You're still in the wrong tense.

>Something exploded within Sunset Shimmer.//

Then why does the narration sound so calm and staid? It's a limited narrator in her head.

>she'll find a way//

Into present tense again.

>"This," she said. "Is about your sister.//

That quote sure sounds like it would be a single sentence. Why did you split it in two?

>spell." Memory-Twilight replied.//

Punctuation.

>where had joined forces//

Missing word.

>solution: Check//

Your definition of the solution lasts only the one sentence, so don't capitalize after the colon.

>wards (In//

Don't capitalize the parenthetical element when you still have it punctuated as part of another sentence.

>Heartstring's//

Missing a letter. Their name is "Heartstrings."

>in third pony//

"Person" wouldn't still be used in Equestria? I mean, we don't say a "third human narrator." A person is just a sentient being, not necessarily a human.

>Twilight Sparkle sighed//

Keep in mind the speaking verb applies to the entire quotation. It's hard to sigh that much dialogue. Try it.

>The spearmint-hued mare//

Rarity knows her name, so why would she refer to Lyra like this in her own head?

>10//

All the numbers right around here are short enough to spell out.

>unfroze– Twilight//

Dash spacing. An en dash gets spaces on both sides.

>Her clan has feuded with the Heartstrings//

Since the family name already ends in "s," the proper plural is "Heartstringses."

>A bit of sympathy for the unfortunate victim gnawed its way into her conscience.//

While it's possible you meant that as written, it'd be weird. More likely you meant "consciousness."

>query: How//

Unneeded capitalization after a colon again.

>anticipation and panic dancing within her//

So let the tone of the narration express this instead of saying it outright.

>gamboge//

You'd be lucky to find two or three readers who know what this is, and there are no context clues in the text. I'd noted this for a needlessly complex color name before.

>t-this//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat.

>silvers of glass//

slivers

>before falling. Twilight caught it, before//

Watch that close repetition.

>rose coloured//

Needs a hyphen, but you just described his shield with the same phrasing, and you use it again in the next sentence. That I could live with if you did something to make it clear the repetition was deliberate. Word choice calling attention to it, for instance.

I don't have any big problems with the characters or plot here. It's more about the little things that crop up, like the consistent editing items, the blunt emotional information, and the lapses in character perspective/narrative voice. These are the more important things to fix.

Pacing seems a little off, though. You're taking quite a long time getting to this "the sun is dying" plotline. It gets introduced, and then the story flounders on for a while on things that don't have an apparent connection to that. For instance, it takes a while for this plot point of Twilight getting dyed green to play out, and it doesn't contribute to anything important. You do want the story to feel like it's always working toward something. As I mentioned, you might want to consider tagging it as comedy, too, unless you intend to take a much more serious tone from here on. What you've written so far is heavily geared toward comedy.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2381

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>... And//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>and— Starlight//

You do put spaces around an en dash, but don't use any on either side of an em dash.

>a sheepish look on her face//

Consider how you've been writing the story so far. I'll pull out an example.
>It felt like it had been hours//
Everything the narrator's said so far has been factual except this. This is an opinion stated in the narration. You're not saying "it felt like hours to Starlight." You just say it felt like hours, essentially making Starlight the narrator. So we have a limited narration, and the narrator expresses Starlight's internal thoughts. But this "sheepish look" isn't how Starlight would perceive her own emotion. She'd feel sheepish, not identify it from how her face looks, which she can't see anyway. How would you know you felt sheepish? That's how you get at it from inside a character's perspective. She'd feel her cheeks warming, she'd know what pose she struck. But she'd also use a certain tone in her thoughts. What kind of internal comment might a sheepish person make? Have the narrator do that here.

>Twilight placed a hoof on her friend’s shoulder//

And if you do intend to have Starlight as a limited narrator, this implies she would refer to herself as "her friend," which is strange.

>Starlight’s voice was filled with determination//

It's best to avoid mentioning moods or emotions directly like this. Make her act determined. Besides, it's odd for her to make this external an evaluation of her own tone of voice. I suspect you're actually trying to use an omniscient narrator, but if so, you need the keep the narration from saying anything subjective.

Already in the frst scene, you have these characters use direct address an awful lot. Think of a real conversation you have with a friend. How often do you actually use direct address?

>flash cards!//

When an exclamation mark or question mark is on a word italicized for emphasis, include it in the italics.

The scene does end with the camera seemingly following Starlight out of the room and subject to her perceptions. So I'm not clear on what kind of narrator you're trying to use.

>For Starlight?//

Taking a conversational tone, like asking questions, shouting, getting cut off, and trailing off, further cements this as a limited narration. But you do this kind of thing so seldom that it's hard to tell. So far, this and the one subjective statement I marked early on are the only things making this seem like a limited narration. If you don't keep reminding the reader it's limited, it'll revert to sounding omniscient, so make sure to check in with that every 2 or 3 paragraphs at least.

>her friend’s cottage//

You should probably identify who this is before using such a vague phrase.

>It took a few moment//

Typo.

>Starlight,” Fluttershy smiled//

That's not a very good choice of speaking verb. How do you smile a sentence?

>‘More like assume I’m trying to come up with some sort of plot to take over Equestria,’ she thought to herself.//

The "to herself" is pretty self-explanatory. And if you do want a limited narration, it's often better to have the narrator express the thought instead of presenting it as a quote. It's more immediate in that case.

>The pegasus//

Starlight knows Fluttershy and considers her a friend. Why would she refer to her like this? You don't think of your friends in terms like "the girl with glasses," do you? I'd just use names and pronouns in my own head.

>hovering her way over to the couch and plopping down onto it//

Look how often you tack these participial phrases onto the ends of sentences. You don't want your writing falling into a rut, where you keep exhibiting these unintentional patterns.

>Starlight was hesitant to take a seat//

So do something in the narrative tone to make her sound hesitant. Don't just tell me this.

>I guess//

Also look how often she uses a phrase like "I guess" or "I suppose." These are a little more acceptable as character quirks, but don't overdo it.

>the unicorn//

It's bad enough to refer to Fluttershy as "the pegasus," but why would she think of herself this way? You don't think of yourself as "the person," do you?

>She knew that if she wimped out now, she would never be able to do it.//

Another thing to avoid in a limited narration is use of perception or knowing verbs, like see, hear, know, want, wish, hope. They're all things that narrator can express directly. Starlight essentially is the narrator. If the narrator describes something, it's implicit that Starlight can see it. Likewise, she knows whatever the narrator does. So just kill that "she knew that" off the front and have the narrator say the thought outright instead of acting as a middleman.

>Images flew through her mind of what could possibly come of what she was about to ask//

A few specific examples will speak far louder than a generality.

>which worried Starlight//

Spelling out her emotion again. And as luck would have it, the following couple of sentences already express this nicely, so you don't even need it there.

>of relief//

These "of/with/in mood/emotion" phrases are almost always redundant with a description already there, like your sigh.

>enemies!’.//

Doubled up on the end punctuation there.

>moment….//

Three dots is plenty.

>enough?’ She guessed//

>nothing?” She spoke aloud//
Capitalization.

>growing frustrated//

Don't tell me this; demonstrate it.

>low pitched//

This serves as a single adjective, and what it describes follows it, so hyphenate it.

>fear present in her voice//

Another case where you're having her note her own emotion through an external observation.

>the new voice paused for a moment//

That's not a speaking action.

>“Oh, Starlight Glimmer,” Discord grinned//

How do you grin a sentence?

>She felt a pressure on her neck, and turned around to see him on her left side//

Both of those verbs are tied to the same subject, so you don't need a comma between them.

>“Glim Glam?” She dead-panned.//

Capitalization, and you spelling that without the hyphen earlier.

>But of course,” Discord disappeared once again//

You can't just attach any verb to a quote with a comma. They have to b speaking verbs.

>It was at this point that she became aware//

That's rather a lot of words to say very little of consequence. A lengthy description takes away the sense of surprise, for instance. This also makes her fairly self-aware of the narration.

>“Because I’m me, and you’re you,” she replied. “And no matter how much I want to be like you, I’ll always be me.”//

She catches onto that very quickly, and she didn't even have to struggle for it. That's robbing your story of its tension.

>Golden Harvest looked absolutely delighted to see her//

Don't I get to see it too?

So the low-level things are that you have some mechanical issues popping up here and there (basically, if I had to mention something multiple times, it needs work, and I didn't point out every example), you're a little blunt with emotions at times, the narration doesn't use a consistent perspective, and you like to use non-speaking actions as speech attributions.

On the more abstract side, the pacing gets very rapid toward the end. Starlight's barely identified her problem when it mostly gets solved for her, and it takes little mental wrestling or struggle for her to understand and accept the solution. In a story like this, you want the reader to have a rooting interest in the character, bu there isn't anything to root for here, since she doesn't have to work for anything. Golden Harvest just readily speaks to her as well, which makes me wonder why none of them have before, if they're this receptive to being friends with her. All it took was for Starlight to speak the first word, and Golden dove right in, so what had she been waiting for? If she'd had some kind of explanation, like she always found Starlight's silence intimidating, unapproachable, or off-putting, then it doesn't just come out of nowhere. I also wonder how this is supposed to fit with the events of "No Second Prances," where Sunlight hasn't made a new friend yet but then gains one in Trixie. Or how she seems to be pretty friendly with Spike. In any case, this turnaround of hers is the central point of the story, but it gets resolved so quickly, which makes it seem like it wasn't a big deal in the first place. It probably deserves some more screen time to develop gradually.

It was a nice character piece, though, and you've captured Starlight's voice well.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2398

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Full synopsis:
>started to really show. The constant requests for lessons and autographs start//
Try to avoid close word repetition like that. "Start" and "begin" are also verbs to avoid where possible, as they're rarely illustrative.

Short synopsis:
>and isn't sure what to about it//
Missing word.

Story:
I really question the need for quoted thought in a first-person narrative. It's already set up to deliver his thoughts right to me, so why step back and force the extra distance of making it a quote between the character and reader? That makes the narrator more of a middleman instead of the character himself.

>y'know//

They're both using this phrase a lot. Besides getting repetitive, it's also making it much harder for you to give them distinctive voices.

>something seems weird, here//

Why's that comma there?

>I kept and eye on her//

Typo.

>Confused//

So make the narration sound confused. Get me to conclude this; don't just tell me he's confused.

>smalltalk//

That's two words.

>I mean//

You have him say this as an intro twice in the same paragraph.

It's starting to get off-putting that you use a smaller font for Laverna. I don't know what it means. At first, I guess it was supposed to signify how quiet she is, but now, I can only figure it's supposed to relate to her size, but that has nothing to do with dialogue. If its effect is lost on the reader, there's not much point in doing it.

>I thumped the seat next to me with a hoof, and scooted over.//

You do this a lot. When both verbs are linked to the same subject, you don't need a comma between them. There are a couple of exceptions, like if the comma's necessary to show that an auxiliary verb doesn't apply to both verbs, or when it helps differentiate another conjunction that's serving a different function, or a few other oddball things like that.

>I decided to strike up some more conversation.//

Unless you're going to give me a little more of his thought process than this, you have a pretty self-evident statement here, given that he goes on to strike up some conversation with her.

>'bolts//

Just because you're shortening it doesn't mean it isn't a proper noun anymore. It still needs to be capitalized.

>I heard her approach, and then come to a stop. I heard//

Try to avoid close repetition of words or phrases like this.

>She shook her head in confusion, and then stared at me. Comprehension dawned in her eyes//

You're short-circuiting any sort of mental visual by feeding me the conclusions about her mood directly. It's better to imply these moods through her behavior.

Chapter 3 is devolving into some serious talking heads.

>her face contemplative//

>looking concerned//
Describe it to me and let me make my own judgment.

>in excitement//

"In/with/of emotion phrases" are rarely useful. They're almost always redundant with something already in the sentence.

>took a bit of my own ice cream//

That's probably a typo.

>happy little squeal//

Again, try to avoid those emotion words. The squeal already connotes happiness.

>spronking//

Did you mean "pronking"?

>seemed confused//

How so?

>raw anger//

My only clues to her emotion are her dialogue and the narrator being very blunt like this. She's not acting angry.

>Seeing my expression, her face softened somewhat//

A classic dangling participle. This says her face saw his expression. While true, it's a weird phrasing and probably one you didn't intend.

>just as he was pounced//

Seems like you either meant "just as he pounced" or "just as he was poised."

At this point, I'm not going to keep pointing out the same stuff, so I'll only comment on new issues or plot/character problems.

It's odd to me that he saw her looking very strange and scary with weird eyes and fangs, and chapters later, it doesn't warrant a single thought from him. He doesn't wonder what she is, he doesn't ask anyone about it, and it doesn't seem to concern him until many chapters later.

>"Of course not. But that's different! Family, y'know – of course you help family.//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

It strikes me that Laverna has a rather adult vocabulary and phrasing in this chapter.

>negotiation.I//

Missing space.

It also strikes me that her only argument against not living in the streets is that she wants her independence, and it's not clear it isn't just the standard "grown-ups always gotta tell you what to do." I mean, she is hinting that she might have been abused, but there's a lot of that story missing. If the Endicotts did, the foster system never noticed, with all the foster children they took in? Plus that should be the biggest thing souring Laverna on the whole experience, and she's willing to bring it up, but she doesn't talk about it either, even though she's not trying to avoid it.

>I could hear her crying//

He's looking right at her. He can't see it?

Laverna changes her mind awfully quick. She was completely dismissive that any adult would care about her, and she doesn't gradually come around. She makes a pretty snap decision to listen to Soarin, and it doesn't seem that natural.

Why is this entire letter written as one-sentence paragraphs? It really lacks plausibility that someone would write it this way. I wonder if you didn't make this choice to mask how short the chapter is, but I have to say, it ends up looking more like an angsty attempt at poetry.

And now I'm even more confused about what the Endicotts did to Laurence. If they knew they were in on something unsavory, then wouldn't they react differently to someone like Soarin who comes around asking questions? Wouldn't they seem nervous or evasive or maybe refuse to discuss it?

>But, it's no trouble!//

It's pretty rare that a comma after a conjunction is used correctly. This one isn't.

>she trailed off//

That's already evident from the ellipsis. You don't need to repeat it in the narration.

>she's very insistent it not interfere with her Wonderbolt training//

Odd that Twilight's okay with Wonderbolts training being the priority, especially since Laverna isn't involved with any in an official capacity. She hasn't been to tryouts or anything, so what Wonderbolts training is she even in? Or is she assuming she will be? Even then, it's odd of Twilight of all ponies to indulge that and make a general education take second seat.

Okay, in the next chapter, Laverna apparently is going through some kind of personal training. It would help to know that before Twilight mentions it, and it's still curious that Twilight is willing to give it top priority.

>put'em//

Missing space.

Oh, so it's not even training anymore, but Laverna's become the opening act? That's seriously treading on some Mary Sue territory.

>turned on her heels//

Well... the closest thing a pony has to a heel isn't in contact with the ground.

I don't get why Celestia's dialogue is in italics. That typically means emphasis, so unless she's shouting the whole thing, whatever you intend to convey by it is lost on me.

>a serene smile on her lips//

You just described her as doing exactly this about half a page ago.

>Ver's eyes widened up//

They just did that four lines ago. How much wider can they get?

>her expression took on a calm, serene look//

She's being serene a lot in this chapter.

>Celestia watched Ver run out of the room, a faint smile on her lips.//

It's ambiguous which one is smiling, and if it's Celestia, she just did the same thing not long ago.

>her brows were faintly knit with concern//

There's a lot of "faintly" stuff going on, too.

>they still thought they were great parents//

Well, you heavily implied there was abuse and slavery going on, so I don't know how he can justify this comment. And you've never followed through on all these awful experiences Laverna's supposed to have had. Yet you couch all this just as them providing the bare necessities and thinking that was enough. That's a pretty far cry from slavery and abuse. That's just a kid who feels like her parents don't understand her, which happens all the time. It feels like a plot thread got completely dropped, since you never draw me that dotted line that says things were actually as bad as she says they were. The pony running the orphanage would be just as responsible as the foster parents, so I don't see why they'd put their head on the line as well to act as if nothing happened. There's a big disconnect here.

>you have to do what's best for them from their perspective, rather than from yours//

And that often means doing things kids don't like because they don't understand what's best for them. With the general lack of evidence, I find it hard to be sympathetic with Laverna.

>Is that what it was, all these years?//

Wait, how big of a time skip is this? I've had no indication that the entire story took more than a couple months or so. For that matter, the plot thread about Soarin becoming Laverna's legal guardian also got dropped. So did the one about what Laverna is.

There's a nice story in here, but there are some consistent problems. I'll sum up the biggest ones. There's a fair amount of repetition, and the conversations can get very talking heads. If you look through how many of the scenes are almost entirely composed of single-sentence paragraphs, that's a good indication that the narration is very choppy or being neglected. It's also really strange how you intersperse quoted thoughts almost as a back-and-forth exchange in a first-person narration. The narrator's already set up to deliver those thoughts. Used sparingly, that's fine, but you're defeating the whole purpose of having a first-person narrator. At times, you're very blunt in relaying emotional information, where you don't give the kinds of cues an observer might notice, instead opting to name the emotion directly. It's weird how you differentiate Celestia's and Laverna's dialogue with font. I can't tell what that's supposed to mean, aside from telling the characters apart, but if you make distinctive enough character voices, you won't need that, and you always have dialogue tags at your disposal, too. For that matter, it's easy to confuse Soarin's thoughts with Celestia's speech, since they're both italicized. And finally, there were a lot of story threads that just stopped instead of getting resolved.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2418

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>just a few weeks time//

That kind of phrasing uses a possessive: a few weeks' time.

It immediately strikes me that these characters use direct address in nearly every instance of dialogue. Think about how often you actually do that in a real conversation, particularly when there's only one other person with you. It ends up making the dialogue feel inauthentic.

>It was another lovely fall day and a faint chill ran through the air with the promise of the changing seasons in just a few weeks time.//

You do this a fair amount. Whn you have separate clauses (two subjects that don't share a verb) like you do here (It was... and chill ran), you'll usually want to put a comma before the conjunction.

>in embarrassment//

In general you'll want to avoid using words that directly name a mood or emotion anyway, but the "in/with/of mood/emotion" type of phrasing is especially extraneous. It's almost always redundant with something already in the sentence. In this case, her flushed face and flattened ears already connote embarrassment. Given that you're using Sunset as your perspective character, though, consider that saying she's flushed desn't really fit. This would require seeing her face, which she can't do. She might still conclude her face had flushed by feeling the warmth. So put some thought into how your perspective character would actually perceive things.

>Dozens different legends//

Missing word.

>Celestia looked at her kindly, her teasing expression falling away to be replaced by a gentle warmth.//

Most of the time you want to get a character's emotions across to the reader, you'll want to focus on what can be observed from their appearance and behavior. Just by looking at someone, I can't automatically get kindly, teasing, or warmth. Kindly might mean a little smile and pat on the shoulder. Teasing might be that smile changing into a smirk. Warmth might be relaxing her posture and taking Sunset's hoof. Those are all things I can envision in my head and play a little movie up there. More to the point, this is how we naturally read people we encounter in real life. It makes it feel more authentic when it happens the same way for written characters. I don't get a mental image from "kindly." I have to construct one myself or move on without it. It's your job to make the image; by leaving it at "kindly," you're making the conclusion for me instead of letting me do it for myself.

>Celestia took another sip of tea.//

>Celestia took another sip of her tea.//
These occur pretty close together. The broader issue is that you don't want to be repetitive, but in this specific usage, it's common for authors to lose all imagination when they have characters sharing a drink, and they can't think of anything for those characters to do with their drinks but some variation on "take another sip." Please don't be one of them.

>Then her magic closed the book and slipped it into her saddlebags//

She put one book into multiple saddlebags?

>“You know, there was once a time when I had to all but physically throw you out of my study,” Celestia chuckled.//

Be very careful when using one of these questionable speaking verbs that implies some other action concurrent with the speech, like laugh or sigh. The tag applies to the whole quote, and it's hard to imagine her chuckling that entire sentence. It's probably more reasonable for the chuckle to be in a separate sentence or break up the quote so the chuckling only applies to a little of it.

>and—“//

Dashes can break smart quotes. These are backward. You should scan for instances of this. I see others.

>To remind her of what she once been.//

That doesn't parse.

>“I’m afraid not,” Celestia’s smile was even wider, bordering on impish.//

I already talked about some borderline speaking verbs, but you don't have one at all here. You can't just tack any given verb onto dialogue with a comma. You have to have a speaking action.

>Really?//

When a word is italicized for emphasis and has a question mark or exclamation mark on it, include that punctuation in the italics.

>feel another pang of guilt//

Don't identify it as guilt. Focus on the physical sensations it causes, the mental imagery it stirs up, or the memories it evokes. That'll lead the reader to conclude guilt.

>why…well//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence.

>“I’m sure she would,” Celestia beamed.//

I'm only marking this as another example of a non-speaking verb you're trying to use as a speech attribution. I'll leave it up to you to scan the story for them.

>waylaying//

Are you sure that's the word you want? It seems strange for this situation. Did you mean "mislaying"?

>dissenting voices in her heard//

Typo.

>She wondered if Celestia had to deal with dissenting voices in her heard.//

Now let me revisit that. When you have a limited narrator like you do, you're already giving the reader access to the character's thoughts and perceptions. You don't need to say that Sunset saw something. If the narrator describes it, it's already implicit that it's there. Same deal with this. You've alreay had the narrator asking questions on Sunset's behalf. Why not do so here and avoid the "wonder" verb? Doing so lets me see Sunset's thoughts in a more immediate way. By funneling through the narrator saying she wondered it, you're forcing a distance between me and the character that doesn't need to be there.

>derived half of her catalogue techniques on him.//

Seems more natural to use "from," not "on."

>Moon Dancer slipped the book into her saddlebags//

One book into multiple saddlebags again?

>in horror//

These kinds of "in/with/of emotion" phrases are rarely useful. As is the case here, they're almost always redundant with other information the sentence already contains.

>personal protégés//

Since they're female, they're technically personal protégées.

You're starting to go on a tangent about Canterlot nobility, and it's a little odd. For one thing, it doesn't appear to be germane to the story. For another, you end up saying the same thing in multiple ways. And for a third, it's a very cliched thing to do. You're even a little contradictory, saying Sunset questioned the need for that segment of society, then soon after saying she knew it well and had been studying government function.

>Ran by the perky and insanely talented Strawberry Lemonade//

run

>Sunset’s ears flattened against her head as the blush crept up her cheeks.//

Keep in mind you've been using Sunset as your limited narrator. How can she see her own face to notice the blush? She might conclude she was blushing from the warmth, but that's not how you're phrasing it.

>She went red//

Again, she doesn't know this. She could well have evidence of it, but she doesn't know it from the red, which she can't see.

>“Let me take a wild guess!” A blue unicorn with two-toned mane said//

Capitalization. It also isn't reasonable for Sunset to refer to her as "a blue unicorn with two-toned mane." She knows exactly who this is. Would you use descriptive phrases like this when referring to your friends in your own thoughts? It feels very unnatural.

>The perky blue unicorn//

Another of these references that it's odd to have Sunset use about a close friend in her own thoughts.

>when the Soft Treat//

Extraneous "the."

>the results of said spell connects//

Subject-verb number mismatch: results connects.

>how?//

You've been good about this so far, but when you use italics for emphasis, include a question mark or exclamation mark in the italics.

>Sunset could feel the unicorn’s concerned eyes on her//

See, this one's even truly ambiguous. They're all unicorns there. How is that descriptor supposed to help narrow it down?

>you don’t know…” She trailed off//

I already see that from the punctuation. You don't need the narration repeating it.

>an expression I’d never seen, as if she’d never seen me before//

Kind of oddly repetitive.

>The mirror, just didn’t bother me so much after that.//

Why in the world is that comma there?

>I’ll always be there to buck your flank when you need me to.//

It's really weird that you're playing that word as both the standard sense and profanity.

>If you’re really hunting for a lost volume, she’d be the pony you’d want to see.//

Curious that she's already mentioed Sunburst and seems quite familar with him, because this is really his strength. Several times in canon, someone else had to help Twilight find a book in her own library.

>of which I am fond of//

Redundant "of."

>“Ah yes, the prodigy,” Scrollwork smiled wanly.//

More non-speaking attribution.

>waylaid//

That word choice again. I don't think it means what you think it means.

>a pained expression//

Describe it to me and let me conclude that's what it is.

>something approaching vaguely warmth//

That doesn't quite parse.

>a single searching look. For his part, he looked//

"Look" is a word may authors tend to overuse. You have quite a few of them in this chapter, and they bunch up in clusters at times. It's worth going for more variety.

>Sunset was forced to trot and weave//

This indentation looks off.

>vast, the ceilings at least eight stories high. All around them stood the massive oak bookshelves, filled with a vast//

Watch the close repetition.

>every written work produced in Equestria in the last millennia//

I have to think you meant "millennium" there. It only takes a couple millennia to cover recorded history, so that would be pretty redundant.

>we’ll need to be doing//

How is this phrasing better than the simpler "we'll need to do"?

>the book accidentally sent here instead of the reserved section//

Missing word.

>Do you mind if I just lay here for a bit?//

Lay/lie confusion.

>But, I’ve changed a lot since then.//

It's rare for a comma following a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>as is suppressing the desire//

Typo.

>I had drew//

Bad verb form.

>me?//

Italicize the question mark, too.

>The older unicorn//

Some of these type of descriptors actually worked fine in this chapter, particularly the ones about Twilight, since Sunset doesn't know her. But describing herself this way just isn't plausible.

>aloneLet//

Missing period and space.

>from relief//

You don't need this. It's already apparent, and it's far better to let the reader figure it out anyway.

>she let out a breath she hadn’t known she was holding//

There are few things more cliched than this.

>Sunset felt a strange comfortable serenity pour into her mind//

Don't be so blunt with the emotion. You go on to have a nice metaphor for it anyway, so this is completely extraneous.

>Confusion marred Twilight’s face//

Let me see it and judge for myself.

>the Twilight//

Extraneous word.

>She was sure that Twilight wasn’t noticing Sunset’s own blush either.//

They're blushing an awful lot in this scene. Besides getting repetitive, it also gives the impression you can't think of anything more interesting for them to do.

It should be obvious what needs some attention—basically anything I had to mention multiple times. On the story as a whole, the only thing I can say is that the pacing feels a little odd. The synopsis and all the talk about finding this book gives an entirely different impression than what actually happens in the story. They don't even search for it in earnest until halfway through your last chapter, and then it's completely anticlimactic. They find it quite easily and with little fanfare. Of course, that's only a vehicle for setting up their confrontation, but again, it's a question of perception. There was no indication that was going to be the story's focus, and it wandered around pretty aimlessly for two chapters before even getting to that. You do carry her need to make a better person out of herself as a theme, and that works. It'd actually play better with the pacing and plot to focus on that, since the story spends more of its time emphasizing how important finding this book is and what great things will happen once they do. That really smells like sequel bait, and maybe it is, but as it's an unrelated plot point, it leaves things feeling disconnected. It'd probably work better as a lead-in to a sequel if you didn't play up the power of the book until the end. Well, it's worth bringing it up early, I guess, but not to the point that it feels like the A plot.

That's all just a suggestion, though. I think it would make the story much tighter and stronger to give more consideration to what themes you want it to convey and how, but it's an engaging enough story that I'd be willing to post it, once you've cleaned up all these little stylistic and mechanical things.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2421

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>baited breath//

bated

I wonder why you're doing this entire first scene in italics. That works best in short bursts. It'll become evident soon enough what's going on. It just gets irritating to read that much italics.

There's kind of an inconsistent style. Early on you use lots of semicolons and colons, sometimes multiple times in a single sentence, which really isn't a good idea. But that goes toward creating a very formal voice. And then we get something like this:
>And Daring Do was gonna get it back.//
that has a very informal voice.

>Ah s’pose that’s expected.//

You describe this as a "foreign voice" later on. It just ends up being confusing. I know the effect you're going for, but when you have a contradiction like that, the best way to make it work is to go over the top. Go on about how exotic and rich it is, yet continue the accent, and the reader will see the clash and get what's going on. As it is, there's not enough here to tease out your intentions, and it comes across as sincere, that you consider a southern accent to be foreign.

>His gravelly voice and foreign drawl was//

You have a compound subject, which makes it plural, yet you have a singular verb.

>with baited breath//

>he too had been holding his breath//
>and held her breath//
This is all in the same paragraph. Look how repetitive that is.

>Once she had one foreleg out she used it for balance and leverage and pulled herself farther.//

You have a number of spots like this where you need a comma between the clauses.

>Applejack thought she caught a tiny twitch in Rainbow’s right eye.//

Why are you jumping over to Applejack's perspective here? The imagining was obviously from Dash's, and I don't see an advantage in transferring between them. A lot of times, you can even present the same information. If you stay in Dash's head, she'd still know her eye had twitched, and she'd still see Applejack's reaction to it.

And now this conversation is degrading into talking heads. When you have little or no narration, it disconnects the feeling that this is a real conversation happening. When two people talk, they express a lot of their emotion nonverbally, and they do things as they talk. It's those little things that bring a conversation alive. You can even work in some scene setting. If you skip all that, you're sacrificing a lot of your story's ability to create a rich image. Going with dialogue only or just a little bare-bones narration is an effect that's difficult to do well.

>burying her face in her hooves and sobbing into her book//

That wouldn't seem to be possible. If her face is in her hooves, how's she holding the book?

>She puffed out her chest and looked proud.//

You're definitely still in Applejack's head. At last you're not skipping back and forth, but I still don't see the advantage of going away from Dash in the first place. Anyway, where emotion is concerned, it's better to give the evidence and let the reader make the conclusion. If you were an actor, how would you get the audience to think you were proud? You wouldn't just come out and say it. You'd look and act proud, and that's how real people read each other anyway, so it's more natural. That's how written characters' emotions should be portrayed, for the most part. But it's also redundant here, since the puffed-out chest already connotes pride, so why are you feeding a conclusion to the reader when you've already led him there?

>Around here?//

Doesn't Rarity find lots of gems near town?

>fixin’ lots and lots of repairs//

How do you fix a repair?

>the young mage//

>the young Dragon//
By now, you've already identified who these are, so why are you still treating them as if the narrator doesn't know? And just a couple paragraphs later, it becomes apparent you want a limited narrator in Twilight's perspective. She wouldn't describe herself and Spike in these terms. Do you normally think of yourself as "the fanfiction author" or some such? It's strange.

>arguing voices caught her attention//

>arguing as usual//
Watch the close repetition.

>Applejack looked relieved//

So tell me what it looks like so I can make my own judgment. Think about the actor again. How would he get you to think his character was relieved?

>while it sounded like Applejack remained thoroughly unconvinced//

>“Uh huh,” Applejack said, thoroughly unconvinced.//
More close repetition, and since Twilight can directly observe the latter one, it's more important to give the reader the same evidence she uses to reach that conclusion instead of just delivering that conclusion to the reader.

>Twi’//

It's just a nickname. You don't need the apostrophe. You don't stick one on the end of John, even though it's a shortened form of Johnathan, do you?

>rolled up//

This whole phrase functions as a single adjective for the word that follows, so hyphenate it.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>“It’s fine,” Twilight smiled//

You've punctuated that like a speech attribution, but there's no speaking action. How do you smile a sentence?

>artefacts//

You spelled it "artifact" earlier.

>So you—“ She reached and tapped Daring Do on the chest. “—need me.//

A couple things. Dashes can break smart quotes. Notice how that first set is backward. You can paste some in the right way. And when you have a narrative aside in a quote, it doesn't get capitalized (unless it starts with a word that has to be capitalized anyway) or take end punctuation (except possibly for a question mark or exclamation mark, if appropriate).

>first few appeared, out of sight at first//

More close repetition.

Now look at the word choices early in chapter 2. You use "was" 7 times in just the first 3 paragraphs. Any forms of "to be" are just boring. Nothing happens. It's not realistic to avoid it altogether, but it's worth limiting it as much as you can. When you hit a cluster of them like this, it just grinds the action to a halt.

>Daring didn’t seem to concerned//

Typo.

>It took a moment for her to realize that they weren’t on the path anymore. She looked around, trying to find some sign of it.//

This is all pretty redundant with what she says next.

>SMACK!//

There are certain kinds of stories where sound effects in narration can work, but for most stories, they don't quite fit the mood. Just describe what happens here.

>Daring Do reached into her saddlebags and pulled out a notebook//

She pulled one notebook from multiple saddlebags?

>Daring knelt low and brushed the greenery away from it’s base.//

Its/it's confusion.

>The tower looked seriously old: none of the top remained//

Keep in mind you're using Dash's perspective here. Using a colon like that is a pretty highbrow structure, and I'm not sure Dash would do so, or if she'd even know how.

>Rose?//

When you've italicized a word for emphasis, also italicize any question marks or exclamation marks on it.

>Applejack’s eyes narrowed, trying to weigh Dash’s words//

Her eyes tried to weigh Dash's words?

>Sometimes the carvings spell out certain clues. Sometimes the environment reacts with the puzzle in some way, but that usually requires some extremely convenient timing and luck.//

You're losing me again. This doesn't sound at all like the way Dash would talk.

>Wondeful//

Typo.

>while the Duke from Daring Do and the Gilded Throne was a spoiled brat with power and an ego//

This is just a dependent clause. Why'd you set it off with a semicolon?

>the the//

Repeated word.

>to reveal an a mean, angry feline face//

Extraneous word.

>Hey!//

Include the exclamation mark in the italics.

>bored, disappointed expression//

Describe it and let me decide for myself that it's bored and disappointed.

>and I’m gonna kill you. I clearly should’ve killed you a long time ago//

Wow, where's this coming from? Daring's never threatened to kill anyone in the show.

>CRACK//

That's a valid word as is. You don't need the capitals or the italics.

This is a very interesting idea for a story. It comes across as pretty bland, though. You're using a limited narrator, which should give me a front-row seat to the character's thoughts and impressions, yet everything that happens gets described as a list-like series of events. It's only in the quieter moments that you give much attention to how the characters feel about what's going on. So if the characters aren't excited enough to express it internally, why would the reader care much either? You have to sell it. Draw the reader into the characters' viewpoints by making them very vivid and involved in the story. They do at least act like they're engaged, but it should show up in that stream of consciousness, too. Yet every time the action gets going, the narration reverts to being very factual. It's like you couldn't decide whether to use a limited or omniscient narrator.

There are times your narrator takes a conversational style and even shows some passion, like making an exclamation, asking a question, or emphasizing words, so you know how to do it. That's the kind of thing that really brings the characters alive, if you truly want to use a limited narrator.

That's a pretty important leap to take as an author, once you understand how and why this stuff works. If you can make some progress there, I could see posting this.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2422

>>2421

Thanks for the review. I've updated the first chapter and will work on the next. I haven't followed each of your comments, especially those that are more about my style than not, but I've taken the grammatical errors to heart. Thanks!

To be honest, this is deeper feedback than I got with my other reviewer, though he wasn't tasked specifically with grammar. Would you like me to share the rest of the story through google docs? I'm not sure what time or interest you have but this is fantastic feedback. Is there a better way to get in touch with you?

-whiterook6

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2430

>>2422
This would be the quickest way to communicate with me. I only work through GDocs or FiMFiction with people I know well, since it means revealing who I am.

I'm not sure which stylistic things you mean. Basically, the three things to watch for are:

1) Keep the character perspective consistent.
2) Make sure the narrative voicing fits the perspective character in tone, personality, vocabulary, and intelligence level.
3) Don't lose sight of how the characters feel and react to things, especially where the action ramps up.

Frankly, these are the more important things to do right, so I hope you're not focused on correcting the grammar only.

It's very likely these same problems persist into further chapters, as they're equally pervasive in the ones you've published so far. If you can get a handle on them in these three chapters, you'll have the know-how to address them through the rest. There wouldn't be a lot of point in having me go through more of it now, only to point out the same things. I might see some additional plot or character issues, but I'd eventually get a chance to find those later on anyway.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2431

>>2430

(I feel a surprising need to explain some of the choices I've made, but each time I try I just sound whiney. You said if I address these issues then I might get featured. The most important question I have is, if I disagree with *some* of your evaluations, will I be rejected? I've been working on this for years and part of me wants to just get it done, but your feedback has exposed a plateau I've reached in my writing, and I want to improve. And I'd love to get more readers and comments.)

You're right -- these problems are common to all the chapters I've written. I am trying to go through them and address the issues before they come up, but it's hard. In particular, one challenge I know I have is with narration, and I think it's what you're talking about. When a character has a thought, do I

a) have the narrator express that thought as narration: She was pretty sure there weren’t any feline predators in the Everfree Forest -- maybe cougars? Those lived in forests, for sure.

b) have the narrator report on the thoughts using italics, like "thought-bubbles": I'm pretty sure there aren't any felines in the Everfree Forest -- maybe cougars? Applejack watched as the cat yawned loudly, exposing its fangs.

c) treat it like dialogue: I'm pretty sure there aren't any felines in the Everfree Forest, Applejack mused. Maybe cougars?

d) try to reveal it in dialog as much as possible?

I know I jump around back and forth, so I should probably pick one. If I read you correctly, you're leaning towards the first?

As for the jumping around in POV, I know I have to stick to one point of view. If it jumps around, it's because I didn't do enough of a job locking that POV down at the start. The second scene of the first chapter -- right after the excerpt from the Daring Do novel -- is Applejack from the start. She hears the cloud swear, sees RD pop her head out, and watches RD fall to the ground. It's certainly supposed to be her all the way, and I hoped it would be a good enough scene break.

Finally, the feelings and reactions during action. Whenever I try to put in feelings or thoughts or reactions during a brawl, for example, I always feel like it's stealing momentum from the action. How can I balance the frantic staccato pace of fisticuffs with keeping the reader immersed? I don't really understand how someone fighting for her life has time to register thoughts.

I'm not focused only on grammar and spelling. It's just really flipping frustrating when you see the word Tome red-underlined over and over only to have the spell checker completely miss 'Wondeful'. (I don't rely solely on spellchecker, but I've reread these chapters so much that I can't see the individual spellings any more.)

Yep, sounding whiney. Thanks for your help. I do really appreciate it.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2439

>>2431
Sorry for the late reply, as it's been a busy weekend around the homestead.

Of your options a through d, the best choice really depends on what kind of narrator you have. "a" is the best for a limited narrator, which is what you seem to be using most of the time. "b" and "c" are essentially identical, just the same as the difference between tagged and untagged dialogue. These are appropriate for an omniscient narrator but would feel out of place in a limited narration if you used them more than just a little bit. For omniscient, there's another option you didn't cover, which is to have a subjective statement explicitly assigned to a character to avoid having the narrator express it as if his own opinion, like "Scootaloo found the old house creepy" instead of "The old house was creepy."

"d" is not bad in essence, that you can express such things through dialogue, but I wouldn't rely on dialogue to do it entirely or even a clear majority of the time. Nonverbal communication, even that which is involuntary, is an important tool for deciphering character emotion, and that'd all take place in the narration.

POV can be a tricky thing. You do want to stick with a small number of them. The more time a reader spends in a single perspective, the more he'll identify and sympathize with that character, so if you have a 50-chapter work that uses a unique character for each chapter's perspective, the reader's just going to feel lost and not in touch with any of them. You don't have to keep it to just one, either, thought you certainly can. It's easiest to switch perspective characters at a scene break, as it's already a spot where the reader is regrouping, so you don't have to be smooth about the transition. You just have to make it clear right away in the new scene who holds the POV. You can change POV during a scene, too, but there's a certain finesse to it that takes some practice. In that case, it's important to make sure the shift is justified. I ask myself these questions: Is there information required from both perspectives that can only be delivered from their respective POVs? (Basically, think about perception and knowledge. If you need the reader to know Dash is sad, it's entirely possible to show that through Twilight's observation of her. But if you need the reader to know one of Twilight's tightly held secrets then show Dash's unique internal impression of something she sees, then it may be justified. Or if you need the reader to know what Pinkie thinks, but then you also need the reader to see what happens in the room after Pinkie leaves, that might be another example of a justification.) Could you find a single perspective that could relay all that information? If it's important enough to switch to the second character, is it also important enough to stay there for a while? Basically, if you jump around too often or abruptly, it's jarring to the reader. So about that smoothness: the trick is to ease out of one perspective and into another. You might have a sentence that's deep in a character's head, then back off to one that only mildly expresses that character's opinion, then back off again in to something factual that could pass as omniscient narration. Then go through the process in revers to go into the new perspective. Just look up the literary concept of "psychic distance," and you'll see what sorts of levels there are to it. You want to pull back from a limited feel to an omniscient one briefly, then get more limited again in the new perspective.

About putting in reactions and emotions in an action scene... it depends on the scene. If AJ is locked in fast-paced deadly combat, yeah, she doesn't have time to dwell on internal thoughts. But if Dash is enjoying the feeling of being in a race, she would have more mental space to do so. In any case, it also depends on your type of narrator. An omniscient one needs to focus on facts, so if someone gets punched, make sure to describe them in such a way that the reader will interpret them as surprised, angry, or whatever's appropriate. With a limited narrator, there's an important internal component. So if AJ gets kicked, one way is to have her exact thought process as narration, something like this:

>Applejack tried to dodge left, but the changeling had read her move, and—Ow! The little bastard's hoof had caught her under the chin.


Little things like word choice, emphasis, tone, and taking on an informal, conversational style make it feel more like the reader living AJ's experience of it than getting some dry description of it after having spent the calmer moments getting to see AJ's thoughts. It's not about pausing the action to show how AJ feels. It's about putting her reactions in the right places to make it feel like she's a real, breathing character who's affected by what's going on, instead of just someone dispassionately watching the events occur.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2441

Thank you for the continued help.

Just to confirm, should I resubmit the story through the fanfiction submission form on ED after I upload chapter 3? And, when I do resubmit, it gives two options for if it's been submitted before: Yes - This story has been submitted before, and Yes - This story is back from Mars. Which do I choose?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2446

>>2441
Yes, go through the submission form again. Just choose the "yes, this story has been submitted before" option. If the story was sent to Mars, the reply email will say so.

You don't have to wait to post additional chapters to resubmit. I'm more looking to see how you do with revisions, since the later chapters will take care of themselves if you learn from doing the revisions.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2450

>>2366

Just a question:
What are the chances that the stories here would get through?

Thanks for the advice and sorry for the month-late reply!

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2461

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>The Statue lays in the royal gardens//
Lay/lie confusion. Not sure why you capitalized "statue" when you didn't later in the same sentence.

Story:
>Its clawing me to shreds and pieces//
Its/it's confusion.

>little, innocent//

These are hierarchical adjectives, so they don't need a comma. In short, they describe different aspects.

>to not//

Reverse the order of these.

>stich//

Typo.

>how that feels like//

The usual phrasing would be "how that feels" or "what that feels like."

>where a little colt, lived with his loving parents//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Her serene face, is glowing with silver light//

Or there.

>Somewhere in there, is the playful draconequus I used to team up with to prank my sister whenever she needed it.//

Or there.

>She paces her room with such fervour, she may wear her hooves out.//

Comma splice. You have a couple of these. I can't tell if some of them were intentional but with only a few exceptions they all seemed out of place.

>no creature should be treated like that.//

Capitalization.

>daddy was never afraid//

When essentially used as a name, family relations get capitalized.

>I think you-//

Please use a proper dash.

>It does not matter that I run from every pony, who tries to throw things at me.//

Something's not quite parsing there, but I'm not sure what you were trying to say, so any sort of correction I offer would only be a guess.

I can't tell how old Screwball is supposed to be here. Her constant use of "daddy" and how she describes him makes her wound quite young, but she uses very advanced language. It makes it feel like there's a disconnect.

>Word tumble//

Subject/verb number mismatch.

>just stands firmly, as if it’s just another ordinary day, with nothing to worry about. As if we did not just//

That's a word many authors overuse. 3 times in 2 sentences is overdoing it.

>No. She would not do that.//

Missing a line break here.

>Then eyes, red and yellow, glaring, betrayed, tortured, occupies the entirety of my vision.//

Subject/verb number mismatch again: eyes occupies.

>piecing//

Typo.

>by I didn’t register the words//

Typo.

>I know.” She whispered.//

Capitalization.

If there's something you intended in Celestia's chapter to convey by starting in past tense, changing to present at the scene break, and changing back to past at the end, then it's completely lost on me. The first scene doesn't even sound like it's Celestia.

Discord's chapter was odd. He seems to have attitudes and violent tendencies that canon doesn't support, yet you're not tagging this as an alternate version of him. Dark is fine, but when he scoffs at turning ponies to stone as a dirty trick, he certainly comes across as more playful than malicious. It helps if you're going to take a significant deviation from canon to explain the difference.

There's a very subtle story behind each of the chapters, except Screwball's doesn't seem to say anything at all. It gives a picture of her missing her father, but it doesn't make a point. So that one seemed pretty extraneous.

What bugged me the most is that you have four chapters so far, each from the point of view of a different character, but they all have more or less identical voicing. They all have this very purple style, and I'd already noted it didn't sound quite right for Screwball. It doesn't seem to fit Discord's personality, either, but the larger point is they all sound the same.

Lastly, it's so vague about each character's emotional turmoil, leaving things to generalities instead of giving specific examples, for the most part, so it's hard to sympathize with the characters. They sure act like they're in pain, but without the context, I don't fully understand their pain, so it doesn't draw me in. It's like watching someone cry at a funeral for a person you don't know. Sure, you feel bad for the person, but on a default level, the same you would for anyone who's lost someone. But without the details, you don't know exactly what's been lost, so it doesn't go beyond that default. You do have a little here, but again, it's more situational. Like a story about Celestia being upset about having to banish her sister, it draws that turmoil from canon, not the story itself, so it's the same starting point any story on the subject gets, and the goal is to stand out above all those.

Other pre-readers might disagree about Discord's characterization or the emotional connection, but independent of that, the lack of distinction between the characters' voices is a big issue. If you'd used an omniscient narrator, it would make sense for that to be uniform, but not when the narrator adopts each character's persona.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2462

>>2450
Not sure exactly what you're asking, but for the most part, if you're getting feedback here, you're better than average. It's not worth the kind of time it takes to compile these notes if it's a story I don't think will ever make the cut, but there can be a wide spectrum of ones that only need a little work or need quite a bit.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2466

>>2462
Oh...thank you for the reply! I hope my story doesn't fall too far into the terrible category then.

Also, 'chifferobe' is an acceptable alternate spelling according the wikipedia, but I'll change it anyway (because chifforobe looks more correct?)
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2468

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Celestia’s sun//

This is really, really, really cliched.

>the first of the outposts into Equestria//

An outpost is just a place. It doesn't move. It'd be "in" Equestria, not "into."

>Walking over to the expansive window, I swung open the curtains//

This is one of the dangers of participial phrases. They mean that things happen at the same time, but she wouldn't swing open the curtains until after she'd walked over. Plus "swinging" is an odd action to take with curtains. It implies they're hinged.

>upper class//

You're using the entire phrase as a single modifier for the word that follows, so hyphenate it.

>good amount of the idle changelings//

"Amount" is more properly used for collective quantities, like food. For individual items, use "number."

>The manor was a result of vast quantities of time spent growing our influence within the city and accumulating more and more wealth.//

But why do they need wealth? There was no indication that they had or needed anything material in the show, and you haven't done any world-building here to suggest why they would. It's also odd how you have them seeing the ponies' magic as a source of food, not their emotions, though I suppose "friendship is magic" does equate the two.

>And yet,//

There are specific circumstances under which it's appropriate to have a comma after a conjunction. This isn't one of them.

>exhausted eyes. An exhausted//

Watch close word repetition like that.

>It was a little habit from my interactions with the ponies I never saw fit to kick.//

It took me a couple of read-throughs to realize this didn't mean she kicked ponies.

>If anything, I was going to need it if I was going to meet today’s visitor with any shred of Baltimare dignity.//

Really strange to have the two "if" conditionals. They're nested, so they'd seem to have an increasing specificity, but they're pretty unrelated.

>nearly fumbled the makeup kit onto the floor, and an ill-timed stab from the eyeliner brush nearly//

More close repetition.

>Whipping around to face the front of the manor, I sprinted down the hallway//

Another spot where the participle indicates simultaneous action that doesn't make sense.

>I looked up at her with hope in my eyes.//

How does she know? She can't see her own face. More to the point, you're in her perspective, so it doesn't make sense to relate her emotion through an external observation of it. More immediate to her would be the internal effects of it. And don't be so blunt as to directly identify it as hope. If you were an actor playing her role, what would you do to make the audience think you were hopeful? Have your character do the same kinds of things. This is how we normally read each other anyway, through visual and behavioral cues, so it feels more lifelike.

>making her mark here in Equestria, and she’s making//

More close repetition. I'll also say that it strikes me how often these two are using direct address already this early in the conversation. Think about how often you actually do so in a real conversation, particularly when it's only you and one other person.

>The hunger pang of my changelings//

Make this more visceral. It'll have more impact if you really demonstrate how it feels, what sensations it causes.

>I found myself shouting at the queen.//

You might be able to sell this better with a bit of internal narrative comment showing her getting worked up. And don't make it so passive. "Found myself" is a construction that should be used only with careful consideration, because it makes it sound totally involuntary. At the very least, I'd recommend moving this bit as a narrative aside into the quote at which point she actually starts. You don't want to modify how the reader hears speech after the speech has already happened. Then the reader has to go back over it or ignore the effect. So something like this:
“S-so we’re just leaving them to die? To”—I found myself shouting at the queen—“rot while we try to fight a war? While we’re hemorrhaging able hooves?
Note the placement of the dashes. Here, they mean the speech didn't stop for the aside's action. If the speech does stop, put the dashes inside the quotes, with the speech.

>The reverberation through the link made her words feel as if they were booming inside my head//

So how does this make her feel? Never forget that part. You don't want to write a story as a sequence of actions. For the ones that are important, you should also relate how the characters feel about them. You do at least have her stagger back, but what would happen internally? What physical sensations would it cause?

>Let this be a lesson growing up//

Seems like you might be missing an "in."

>Broodmother Requiem//

If "Broodmother" is actually an official title, then you need to capitalize it whenever it's used in place of her name.

>struggling to contain my own emotions//

So describe the struggle. That's what makes me feel it with her. What you have is a cold fact that doesn't mean much.

>My eyes glared with such intensity//

Again, this isn't something she can see, so how is she describing how her own face looks?

>once pristine//

Hyphenate.

I really question the need for quoted thoughts in a first-person narration. Before, the italicized lines sometimes seemed to be her own thoughts and sometimes those of her brood. But a first-person narration already gives us access to her thoughts. What's the point of presenting them like quotes?

>I laid there//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to get right.

>I quickly deduced the identity of my visitor, and let out a sigh.//

There's no reason for a comma there. Both verbs are linked to the same subject.

>A-are you alright, mother?//

Family relations are the same as titles. They get capitalized when effectively used as names. So it's "I'm going to the store with Mom" but "I'm going to the store with my mom." I won't mark any more of these.

>T-there//

Consider what sound would actually be repeated.

>keeping my emotions in check//

That's just so vague that it doesn't really mean anything.

>understand what was happening, even with my limited understanding//

Fairly repetitive.

>Spending a majority of one’s life in a city meant there weren’t a lot of opportunities to get out into the wilderness, but I was certain that what I was looking at was not representative of forests as a whole.//

I remarked on something like this earlier. Look at that cluster of "to be" verbs. A lot of these aren't hard to rephrase. Say instead of "was not representative of," you used "didn't represent." But having three instances of "was" in a span of only 9 words? And you have 9 "to be" verbs in this paragraph. Then 5 in the next. The whole chapter has 151 instances of "was" alone. You're awash in these boring verbs.

I suspect I'll get more used to what your section headings mean as I go further into the story, but every one of them has utterly confused me so far. I think it'd help to identify your perspective character's identity immediately as each scene begins. I spent the beginning of this chapter thinking the narrator was still Chiron, up until he explicitly said he wasn't. Then when the second scene began, I assumed the narrator was still Nymph until a few paragraphs in, when you make it clear one of the ponies is narrating. You don't want your reader to spend every scene being utterly confused at the beginning, then having to alter the context in his head once he figures out someone else holds the perspective.

>captain?//

When you italicize a word for emphasis, include any exclamation marks or question marks on it in the italics.

>According to dad//

When you effectively use a family relation as a name, capitalize it, so it's "Dad" but "my dad."

>the Captain//

Likewise, when you make it generic by putting something like "the" on the front, you don't capitalize it, possibly except for things like "Queen" which might get extreme reverence. Even so, you aren't consistent at capitalizing it.

>Vice//

Odd choice of name/accent for her, since a Russian accent would render her name's pronunciation as Wice. I bet you don't have her say it that way, if she says it at all.

>I quickly stowed the book into my saddlebags.//

One book into multiple saddlebags?

>we just need to make sure the statue is there as well as where it is.//

Odd couple of goals. If you satisfy the first, don't you have the second by default? And vice versa? I don't see how they're not the same thing.

It's clear at least when you go back to Nymph, since that's how the scene is labeled. "Overwatch" confused me because I had no idea what that was. It's a little heavy-handed to declare each scene like that, though. There's a reason you don't see many books do this.

>piece of cover, a tall piece//

Watch the repetition.

>Long range//

You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it. I won't mark any more of these.

>There was panicked yelp//

Something's a little off in the wording.

>I let out the breath I didn’t know I was holding.//

And this is even more cliched than "Celestia's sun."

>when the ground shifted under the blue mare//

She knows her well. Why would she refer to her as "the blue mare"? You don't think about your friends in terms like that do you?

At this point, I have to question why you're switching back and forth between Nymph and the pony so frequently. It jerks the reader around. You couldn't do the whole thing from the pony's perspective, since she doesn't know Nymph is there, but Nymph can see and hear everything the pony squad is doing, so she can still present all that's happening and the evidence of how the ponies feel about it all.

>head first//

That's one word.

>It swiped with a paw, drawing open three burning lines right above my left shoulder. I screamed. Nearly blinded from the shock, I threw whatever magic I still had in its general direction with my horn.//

This is a common issue, where writers suddenly become very factual when the action ramps up. This must hurt, and she's the one narrating it, so why doesn't the narration sound like she's panicky and injured? She's just rattling off facts like she's reading a textbook.

>Something cracked. I was certain that the carapace over my chest had cracked from the impact.//

This is pretty redundant.

>as she knelt down beside me, removing her saddlebags as she surveyed my ruined carapace//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence. Also, they do they same thing as participial phrases to synchronize things, so all three of these actions occur at once. I'm not sure that's what you intended.

>“B-but I…” I trailed off//

The ellipsis already means trailing off. You don't need to repeat it in the narration.

>as I laid there//

Lay/lie confusion. I won't mark this anymore either. Suffice it to say that if the verb just happens, you need to use "lie," and if it happens to something, use "lay." So you lie down, but you lay your head down.

>My muscles strained as I crawled back into the clearing, the moonlight temporarily blinding me as I emerged into the open.//

Two "as" clauses in the same sentence again. It creates a repetitive feel.

>You look like a cornered rabbit//

Rather self-aware of the story to do this, given that's exactly what nymph thought just a couple paragraphs ago, word for word.

>‘cause//

Smart quotes always get lading apostrophes backward, since they think you want a single opening quotation mark. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. I won't mark any more of these.

>there could’ve definitely some sort of magic in there//

Missing word.

>T-that//

Consider what sound he'd actually repeat. It doesn't even start with a "t" sound.

>He turned to me, and my eyes widened when he brought up my scarf from under his wing.//

There are a lot of eyes widening in this scene. Nymph just did so three paragraphs ago? Did they narrow in the meantime? Or are they even wider now? Even so, it's just repetitive.

>I listened with dread//

Another spot where you're awfully blunt with the emotion. Make the narration carry a dreadful tone in what it says and how.

>My eyes widened in shock//

So how wide are they by now? These kinds of "in/with/of emotion" phrases are best avoided anyway. besides being too blunt, they're often redundant with something already in the sentence.

>revealing little except her disappointment//

You really have to watch these emotion words.

>anxiously//

Every time you see one of these emotions with an -ly tacked on the end, consider whether it's just a fleeting thing with no importance to the plot. If it is important, then imply it through the character's behavior and appearance or the narrative tone, instead of just feeding the conclusion to the reader.

>Think of it like copying words into a journal and putting them onto the ling’s shelf.//

You do need closing quotes here, since the next paragraph starts with narration.

>Your head,” he prodded my forehead with a hoof. “Is a giant mess//

You can't just tack any given action onto speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action. This sounds like you're trying to put a narrative aside in a quote, which you've done before, but I already left a comment about how to format it properly.

>Just act naturally, and you’ll get along just//

That's a word many authors overuse. I haven't noticed it much, but you don't want two in such close proximity like this.

>A part of me felt bad for scaring the pony away//

The way you described her, she didn't seem scared. She didn't seem anything.

>it was quickly overpowered by my excitement//

So make him sound excited. He's delivering this line as if he's reading it from a newspaper article.

>I guessing//

Typo. And note that you've started 3 paragraphs in a row with "I." It's a little repetitive.

If you haven't noticed, by now I'm leaving far fewer comments. That doesn't mean there's nothing worth commenting on—just that I'm seeing things I've already noted, and on a story this long, I just can't afford to be exhaustive. Though the editing does seem to be improving.

>maneuvering the crowd//

More maneuvering "through" the crowd. As you've stated it, they're steering the crowd.

>my sudden bout of severe claustrophobia//

If it really was severe, wouldn't that warrant having the narrator sound something other than calm?

>“Mrrr?”//

I don't understand why she has to do this. It's a telepathic connection. Why would she have to speak it out loud? If all she has to do is think it, there's no danger of the ponies overhearing.

>a stupid grin on my face as I snuggled in deeper//

This isn't really compatible with her perspective. You have her still asleep, yet she's somehow still aware of her expression and actions? I don't buy it.

>“We’re here. In Canterlot,” Steel Blade repeated.//

How can he repeat it when it's the first time he said it? I get that he probably did before Nymph woke up, but this is Nymph's narration, and he doesn't know that.

>stop right where it wanted to stop//

Repetitive. And this "where it wanted to stop" is pretty useless too. It'd be noteworthy if it was way off, but otherwise, it's what people will assume, so it's not wirth mentioning.

You're really using a lot of participial phrases in this chapter. You also tend to use them in the same position in sentences, which makes it even more repetitive in structure. You also tend to tack them onto speaking verbs. Here are all the ones in just the first two screenfuls of this scene:
>heaving a loud groan//
>blinking sleepily//
>slowly applying its brakes//
>picking up his saddlebag with his teeth and tossing it onto his back//
>briefly scanning the floor of the car//
>staying in my seat//
>smiling warmly at me//
>fidgeting with my hooves//
>backing up slightly//
>closing the gap in the aisle//

>sarge//

When you use a rank as a name, capitalize it.

>quick bump from Steel Blade, and I quickly//

More close repetition.

>as he stepped out into the aisle, closing the gap in the aisle as the line slowly shuffled after Vice//

Another spot where it's clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, and where a participle between them means you're synchronizing four actions that shouldn't be.

>well known//

You have a number of these well- terms that need a hyphen.

>Card Shark//

...Which is actually a commonly mistaken phrase. It's become part of common usage just because people think this is how it's said, but it's really card sharp.

>smoothly//

>comfortably//
>amiably//
It's getting a bit repetitive how you keep putting these adverbs on your speaking actions. They're also things you might demonstrate better indirectly, like having Dexter act amiable instead of making me take the narrator's word for it.

>Ogres n’ Oubliettes//

You're inconsistent about the apostrophes around the n. Look how you spelled it when Dexter said it.

>two-story tall//

You need another hyphen, because all of this describes "buildings."

>I could smell the faint flowery smell//

You don't say...

>once gleaming//

Hyphenate.

>dad//

Same as ranks, when you use it like a name (like "Dad" versus "my dad"), it gets capitalized.

>He once explained that it was the smallest number that was the sum of two positive cubes in two different ways.//

Yeah, you've read that anecdote about the taxi number, I bet.

>A common misconception that many have about agelessness was that time mattered less as one got older.//

>This was generally followed by a lengthy bout of melancholy in which I lament my utter lack of hooves//
Why are you mixing tenses here?

>week long voyage//

week-long voyage

>Hope blossomed within the walls of my crystal prison, fueled by the flames of vengeance, and I clung onto it with the desperation of a drug addict.//

Look at all those emotions you're just informing me about instead of illustrating any of them. It's not going to stick with the reader as anything more than a stoic fact.

>self control//

Hyphenate.

>to not//

Reverse the order of these.

>luv’//

What's that apostrophe for? What part of that word is missing?

>I could go wherever I wanted, provided I push her a bit in the right direction//

Inconsistent tense again.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2469

>>2468
>heathens//
If you're going to give her a cockney accent and clip the "h" of the beginnings of words, why do you never do so with this one?

I just noticed the "now" and "then" scene headers as well. That's a pretty inelegant way of handling it.

>He was gone.//

This doesn't surprise her? She's delivering this line as if it's from a history textbook. Plus she's been recently injured. Her stamina's probably down. Through all this chase, she's not going to remark on being out of breath or having her injuries start to ache?

>close. I had managed to close//

I know they're meant in different senses, but this is still repetitive.

>quickly tracked the movement. He turned his head forward quickly//

And more repetition.

>who flew in circles high above, his head moving side to side as he tried to catch wind of where our stallion had gone. I stumbled to a halt, panting heavily as I rolled my aching left shoulder.//

You have two sentences in a row here that go "clause, participial element, as clause." It's a bit much when they're that complex yet identical.

>A decent number of trash bags was piled//

"Number" counts as plural here, but you're using a singular verb.

>I narrowed my eyes//

Steel Blade just did that about one screen ago. Surely you can be more creative than that.

>The pegasus guard//

One place these kinds of descriptive phrases really don't work is when you have a limited narration and are talking about a character the perspective character knows. You don't think about your own friends in your head with these kinds of phrases. And with the memories Nymph has, she's well acquainted with him. Heck, even without the memories, they've spent enough time together. Nymph isn't going to refer to him like that.

>I would have to figure out my limits before I accidentally brain somepony//

Inconsistent verb tense.

>I watched Steel Blade heft the sleeping thug//

He just hefted the pony three paragraphs ago.

>where I laid on her chest//

>who still laid on her back//
Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to keep straight. You need "lay" here.

>I swung to and fro from where I hung around her neck as she went back to the boxes to retrieve her saddlebags.//

And "as" clauses in consecutive sentences, plus some inadvertent synchronization.

>the mer let the unicorn//

And you're overdoing the references in this scene. Referring to Overwatch as such is fine until Crystal learns her name, but there's no reason for him to keep calling Lily "the merpony."

>a not unreasonable reaction to Lilywater’s overly friendly personality//

This sounds less like Crystal saying it and more like the author saying it.

>still open//

Hyphenate.

>we can start with a few basic questions to start//

They can start to start?

>W-who//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated.

>And how did you know I was a changeling?//

Why is she saying this out loud so Lily can hear? She doesn't know yet whether Crystal has told Lily, so why take the chance?

>I was curious about the presence of changelings in Canterlot, to say the least.//

How has he not been detecting them for years? Or maybe listening in on their telepathy?

>Long time infiltrators//

Long-time infiltrators

>unusual to send a changeling so young into the pony world, but to train a female in anything except love collecting or hive maintenance was highly unusual//

This is the kind of repetition that could be used for effect, but the trick is to make sure the reader knows it's there on purpose by using language like "more unusual still" for the second one.

Crystal seems to use direct address a bit more than what would feel natural. How much do you actually use it in real life? It can help differentiate dialogue when more than two people are talking, but a lot of the time here, it's just the two.

It's a little bizarre that you've now made two blatant references to the Overwatch game in a story that has nothing to do with it...

>ten minute naps//

ten-minute. Without the hyphen it means ten minute-long naps. Or ten tiny naps, I suppose.

>Despite having as much vision as a bat in broad daylight//

Depending on the kind of bat, many of them see about as well as a human or a rat. It's only a subset that have poor vision.

>My brow knit together into an expression of dazed confusion.//

Blunt with the emotions again, and this isn't how she'd perceive it anyway. She can't even see her own expression, but what clues you in that you're sad? The thoughts and sensations, or by realizing that you're frowning?

>ear piercing//

Hyphenate.

>shriek from the bathroom, and I chortled to myself as the noises coming from the bathroom//

>back up onto her hooves and stomping back//
Repetitive.

>A bright flower-print towel was thrown out, wrapping itself around her head and muzzle, and the door was slammed shut behind her.//

I don't get the advantage of passive voice here. The change of focus doesn't do anything, and it stalls out the feeling of action.

>just confused as to why you didn’t just//

That's a common word for authors to overuse, so it's worth scanning the whole story for it. You've got 20 of them in this chapter alone, which isn't awful, but make sure they're spread out, not occurring in clumps.

>half empty cereal box//

half-empty. I probably said a while ago that I'd stop marking these hyphens and forgot about it. Anyway, I hope you get the picture with these by now.

>I carefully coated the surface of my bowl of milk with cereal//

This is a bizarre phrasing. She's sticking a thin layer of cereal all over the thing? On the outside too?

>More a thousand years ago//

Missing word.

>quite young back then, but despite all odds, she grew into quite//

>see what I mean when you see//
Repetitive.

>taped gemstone//

Y'know, this has been bugging me. Crystal is fairly vain. She's also helped Lily win a bunch of money at gambling. I'm really surprised Crystal doesn't demand something better than this.

>The streets were indeed to clear a bit.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

>There was still plenty of ponies still//

Subject/verb number mismatch and repetition.

>when I’m barely trying to keep up with the new developments in my life//

Why are you switching to present tense here?

>illusion enchants//

You're using the verb form instead of the noun for some reason.

>“...”//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing. Show me what happens. By itself, this means nothing.

>mostly-gold//

This is the exception. Two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb don't take hyphens.

>The young donut shop owner had an expression somewhere between amazement and horror.//

So describe it and let me come to my own conclusion what it is.

>when the moon reaches its peak//

You seem to have trouble figuring out how to render these more unusual tenses, and you keep resorting to present.

>begin, lasting all the way until sunrise the next day when the real Summer Sun Celebration began//

Repetition.

>began to fill with partygoers//

And then in the very next sentence...

>still a bit surprising she still//

I don't know why you suddenly got a lot worse with this in this chapter.

>Lockpicking for Eggheads//

Book titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>I trotted over to the dining table where Crystal rested, slumping back into a seat.//

Another danger of participles is misplaced or ambiguous modifiers. Participles like to describe the nearest prior noun or pronoun, so this tends to say Crystal slumped, though you probably meant Nymph. It's not clear.

>I considered the mess of locks spread out over the table, looking from the book still propped open to the full set of lockpicks lying across their sound-muffling velvet cloth.//

This one's not ambiguous, but it is misplaced. It sounds like the table is looking from the book.

>One is that you are a changeling that//

When you're talking about a sentient creature, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>to not//

Reverse the order of those.

>I think I heard a subtle click from inside//

Another lapse into present tense.

>before you start eating them!” I shouted, before//

Repetition.

>thomethin’ this//

Why is she inconsistent about the full-mouth-induced lisp?

>carnivorous teeth that Lily’s mouth had suddenly been filled with//

You already mentioned them a little bit ago, which both makes it not worth mentioning again, and takes away any justification for using "suddenly."

>we are going to cook our Tartarus-damned vegetables and meats before we put them in our mouths//

If that's what she wants, why does she put it back in the icebox instead of cooking it?

>confectionaries. Or rather, the partygoers in the streets ran out of cake before promptly baking up another flotilla of cakes to devour. It was apparently tradition to gorge on tasty confectioneries//

Pretty soon to use that unusual a word without going for a deliberate effect, but you spell it differently each time, too.

>with mom and dad//

Capitalize family relations when you effectively use them as names.

>looked up at the mare before me, still looking//

Repetition, and this is a word worth paying attention to, since many authors overuse it.

>hoping that neither of them would see me//

There are a certain class of verbs that don't really belong in this limited a narration, given that the narration effectively gives us the character's train of thought. They deal with thought and perception. Like it's not necessary to have the narrator say that Nymph saw something. She is the narrator, so if she didn't see it as well, the narrator can't takl about it. It's enough just to describe the item, and it's implied the character also sees it. Likewise, you don't have to tell me what the character knows, wants, wishes, hopes, etc., because the limited narrator can express the thought of it. Forcing that verb in there creates extra distance between the character and reader. For example, instead of saying a character wonders something, the limited narrator can just ask the appropriate question.

>“Because I’m trying to figure out how to act like a pony!” I hissed.//

This is a short enough quote that it's not a big deal, but if you want the reader to hear the speech in a certain way, it's best to do so before the quote. There are certain context clues, like italics or exclamation marks probably meaning shouting, but for the most part, a reader's going to hear dialogue in a normal voice when not given a reason to do otherwise. So when you make the reader change that after the fact, he either has to ignore it, accept it as a bland fact, or go back over the dialogue in the modified manner. None of those are ideal.

>nervous about what my officer thought about me being off duty during a guard shortage//

See, here's another spot where a narrative comment expressing the question about what her supervisor thinks would create far more of a personal voice than feeding the reader a ready-made conclusion about her feelings.

>few hooves as I carefully navigated my way around a few//

You're using this word a fair amount lately.

>noble cleared his throat into the microphone on the platform. A quick glance identified him as the noble//

That one too.

>spongy layers//

You already described the cake as spongy.

>And yet, something was wrong.//

There's no reason to have a comma there.

>I took another sip of my tea, and addressed my infiltrators.//

Or there. This one's just a compound verb, not multiple clauses.

>look of chagrin as she looked//

That's another word authors tend to overuse.

>‘ere//

Cockney accents take off a leading "h," but a "th"? I've never heard of that. It's actually hard to say it that way, which is the exact opposite point of an elision.

>closer to me were paying closer//

>around uncomfortably as her eyes darted around//
More repetition.

>heavy scarf//

Why would she wear a heavy scarf in summer weather? It's odd that it's never come up.

>T-thank//

Again, what sound would actually be repeated?

I have to say, I don't at all see the point in switching to Celestia's perspective for that scene. You already took me up to it in Nymph's perspective, and there was nothing important Celestia imparted for her scene. Basically I ask myself: if that had stayed with Nymph, would there be critical things I didn't understand about the story or plot elements that couldn't happen? And the answer to both of those is no. Maybe you're setting something up for later in the story, and I'd obviously have no way of knowing that now, but even so, everything is so mundane about it that I can't imagine something coming of it later on. If you do eventually take Celestia's perspective, it'd be easy to refer to this event, and the reader will remember she witnessed it. I can't think of any of her specific impressions here that would be necessary. And then you go right back to Nymph. I don't see the value in moving away from Nymph's perspective at all. An then that would free you from the expository information about Nymph's thoughts on the matter when you go back to her.

>If there was a time for comfort food, this was the time.//

To avoid the repetition, this is usually phrased as "this was it."

>Crystal had requested that she be hidden away//

Here's the reason for the scarf. This merits mentioning earlier, but as much as Crystal is admonishing her to fit in as much as possible, wearing a winter garment in the summer wouldn't do just that? I guess I'm also a little surprised Lily isn't wearing Crystal, since they never discussed a new arrangement there.

For all these quotes in italics, as long as the whole quote is italicized, so that italics are the "normal" font for it, it's fine to include the quotation marks in the italics.

>Are you in yet?//

This is that Miaisis (or however it's spelled), isn't it? Why does the scene marker not identify the perspective holder? Not that I think these scene headers are a good idea anyway, but this made me think you were continuing on in Nymph's point of view, and I spent a few paragraphs being confused.

>I peeked into the main lobby to found her//

Wrong verb form.

>piece of armor that had accumulated the most imperfections were//

Subject/verb number mismatch: piece... were.

>the perfect shine//

A little repetitive with the "mirror shine" in the previous sentence. Something like "getting them perfect" would work fine here.

>I wretched off the helmet//

Word choice. Maybe you were going for "wrenched"? Even so, that implies a twisting motion, which would be tough to accomplish with the horn going through the helmet.

>kept a few hair bands and ties nearby to keep//

>right into a pressure point on my gut, knocking the breath right//
Repetition.

And once the action scene starts, you're very much in participle mode again. From this paragraph:
>The door clicked shut behind me.//
to this one:
>He wrapped his right foreleg around my fallen limb//
there are only 2 non-dialogue sentences that don't contain one. By my rough count, that's 14 of 16 sentences, and 14 of 18 if I even include the dialogue. That's very structurally repetitive, not only because you have so many, but because you consistently end sentences with them. You have 6 "as" clauses in this span as well, 2 of them in the same sentence, so more repetition, plus you're asking the reader to synchronize lots of things, some of which probably shouldn't be. I only chose that range because it's what fits on my screen. These issues continue on past here.

>a few fell to the ground//

>I fell to my knees//
A little repetitive in consecutive sentences.

>I shouldn’t have tried to confront him, especially at a range where I fell squarely on the lower end of the bell curve.//

Does she realize he's a changeling? I'm curious as to whether she's actually as big as Overwatch, or if that's an illusion and she's her real size. Because at some point, it's not worth maintaining her secret if it'll get her killed, and if changing shape to something large actually makes her that big, why not shift to something like a minotaur or buffalo?

>Mom//

She'd been calling her "mum."

>I sighed as my eyes began to droop closed, snuggling into the cool, hard floor.//

Sounds like her eyes are snuggling into the floor.

So this is quite a good story, but it does suffer from some pervasive problems. I don't think that scene in Celestia's perspective was worth the shift from Nymph's, and there's a lot of word and structural repetition, which also causes synchronization issues with the participles. As numerous as these were, it's at least simple to describe them and sum them up, so they don't require any further discussion.

The other one was how you bluntly name emotions at times. To a degree, you can get away with some of this, since changeling perspectives are odd that way. They do sense emotions as an innate thing, so they're not so much attuned to reading them through body language and facial expression, for instance. So it does make some sense to do this for Nymph's scenes. It doesn't for the non-changeling POV characters, but also consider that most readers aren't going to pick up on the subtleties of that very well. Plus an academic realization doesn't change a more gut reaction, so if someone actually realizes that it makes logical sense for a changeling to identify an emotion outright, that's still not going to make the narrative engaging.

Here's my advice to you on that front. When you have Nymph casting about and trying to detect emotion, naming it as a factual matter is fine, since you're not trying to get the reader to connect with the characters possessing those emotions, for the most part. But when Nymph has someone right there with her, try to give a bit more indirectly through these other means, since that'll bring the story to life with the reader more. It even makes a sort of sense that Nymph would start interpreting emotions these other ways once she's merged with Overwatch. Maybe she doesn't notice doing so, and maybe she struggles with it. That would be an interesting aspect to the story, but it might be too much effort at this point to work that in all the way through what you've already written.

It's a bit obtrusive how many references you make to the game Overwatch and Discworld (and not just by including similar books in your story), as they feel more like eye-winking inside jokes, but that's probably more just my taste. Along those lines, I'll also say I agree with the comment that said the story's tone has an odd shift, where it starts out quite serious and somewhat dark, then transitions into an almost slapstick feel once Lily gets introduced. At least it goes back to being more serious here, but you might consider melding them more thoroughly. I get that you're even trying for a Discworld feel to the entire story instead of making a few isolated references, but consider that Pratchett tends to keep up the comedy even through the serious parts, instead of spending long stretches that are mostly one or the other. It's both, the whole time. Not that you have to mimic Pratchett that closely just because you've borrowed some elements from him, but he's a good example of how to keep the story tonally consistent instead of oscillating between two tones. I'll leave those as suggestions, not requirements.

Once you're ready to resubmit, you can mark it as "back from Mars," since I'd only need to spot-check things. I'd like to see this go up on the blog.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2486

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A tired looking stallion shuffled his way through the mess, his weathered looking peacoat//

Kind of repetitive language there. More to the point, this is someone's opinion, but the story hasn't introduced us to any possible perspective that opinion might come from.

>numbness at the tips of his hooves//

Hooves don't really have feeling. They're essentially giant toenails.

>“Daddy!” It screeched, bouncing excitedly on his lap. Cornelius laughed , gently easing//

Capitalization and extraneous space.

>“Hey, sweetie”//

Missing period.

>The filly’s face//

This is third narrative sentence in a row that refers to her as "the filly," yet the stallion knows exactly who she is. Why would he refer to her like this?

>his mirth turning to surprise//

Think more about how you would convey mirth and surprise if you were an actor. You couldn't just tell the audience; you'd have to get them to read it from your appearance and behavior. That's how we interpret people we see in real life, so it makes it feel more authentic to have it work the same for written characters.

>the little filly//

It's also getting really repetitive to refer to her like this. It's not like it's a mystery who she is, and it's just telling me information I already know about her.

>The filly looked incredulously up at her father before carefully setting her present aside and leaping into her father's hooves, burying her face in the crook of his neck.//

Look at how many participial phrases you use. And look how oftern you put them in the same place in sentences, tacked on the end. Besides being structurally repetitive, keep in mind that participles mean things happen at the same time, so you have a bunch of actions synchronized here that shouldn't be. It's illogical that she can set her present down, leap to her father, and bury her face against his neck all at once, for example. Those things would happen in sequence.

>she let out a breath as she came face to face with her father.//

We're 5 sentences into the chapter, and every single one has an "as" clause so far. That's yet another example of structural repetition.

>“Yeah…” she said, her voice trailing off awkwardly.//

You don't need to narrate trailing off when it's already apparent from the punctuation.

>you go//

Extraneous space.

>uptight looking//

These phrasings should be hyphenated, but they're also getting repetitive.

>and — without missing a beat — Octavia//

Don't leave spaces around em dashes.

>Octavia ‘s//

Extraneous space, which has made the smart quotes turn your apostrophe backward.

>She felt like a captured animal, caged and on display for the amusement of the populace. Blanching at the sheer numbers of ponies skewering her with their eyes, she turned and gave her father a pleading, hopeless look and in return he offered her his most encouraging smile.//

This is symptomatic of the story. Not how the perspective is all over the place. The narrator expresses Octavia's thoughts as if his own (as in the subjective statement about "skewering"), but then the narrator evaluates and expression Octavia can't see (many authors don't get a feel for whether they should convey emotions through internal or external means—that depends on the narrator, and since you seem to be using a limited one, it should go for the internal, since it's essentially Octavia's train of thought, and she can't see her own face), then makes a vaguely subjective statement in her father's perspective.

>Hello miss Octavia//

When attached to a name, "miss" would be capitalized, and you need a comma for direct address.

>looking mare with glasses that looked//

Yet another one of these "looking" descriptions, and then you use a repetitive form just a bit later. This is a word many authors tend to overuse.

>clamboring//

Not sure whether you were going for "clambering" or "clamoring." Probably the former.

>her eyes hard and judgmental//

For the most part, I'm only marking one example of each kind of problem I see, but I'm going to pull out another example of the blunt emotional information here. Don't just say what the emotions behind her eyes are. Describe them in a way that I'll conclude this about them. Let me see them. You want to create rich visual imagery.

>lengthy hour//

Another extraneous space. Maybe you should just do a searh for two spaces.

>There was a pause. “Just go away..”//

One too many or one too few dots. And around here, the indentation goes all wonky.

>Octavia drug herself//

dragged

>the piano underneath still shined//

"Shined" is the transitive past tense, so it takes a direct object. You want "shone."

>the stallion reminded//

That's a questionable choice of speaking verb, as the direct object it takes would be the person who remembers, not the speech that evokes the memory.

>the forty some years we were married//

Good lord, how old is he? The story portrays Octavia as quite young, but this would put her father in his fifties at the very least. It's not impossible, just really odd.

>into music-//

Use proper dashes, not hyphens.

>said?’...So//

Missing space or something. This doesn't quite work.

>to ever pick up and instrument//

Typo.

>make-” The stallion interrupted//

This has the same transitivity problem as "reminded" earlier. And it has the same problem as the narrated "trailing off" earlier in that I already know it's an interruption from the punctuation.

>to it’s full potential//

Its/it's confusion.

>sudden dim. The vibrant melody was suddenly//

More repetition. But this is also a word that should be used very carefully. If something is sudden in the writing, it shouldn't really take the author pointing it out for the reader to get that feeling. It's like having to say that a joke is funny. It either comes across that way or it doesn't, regardless of what assurances the narrator might give me.

>“What’s the point? She said, her shoulders sagging and her voice turning hollow and lifeless. I’ll never be as good as you?”//

Not all of that is supposed t be a quote.

>Thanks dad/

When essentially used as a name, family relations get capitalized.

>Chaplin//

That's an old American actor, and the spellcheck has graciously capitalized it for you. You want "chaplain." Though I have to say even having such a position of chaplain as opposed to a funeral director or some such implies a whole lot of world building that I just know you're never going to develop.

>Thank you for coming every pony//

"Everypony" should be one word here, and it's another place that needs a comma for direct address.

>The first and most prominent of the feelings that hit her was sadness//

The way you nae all these emotions is seriously going to limit how much of an effect they'll have. This is the crux of the story. Demonstrate this. Get me to see her sadness and joy, not just have to accept the narrator's assurance of them.

>her father’s catatonic body//

His eyes are open? That's awfully morbid.

The two main things hampering the story are the bluntness of the emotional content and the inconsistency in perspective. The longest chapter does tend to stay in a single perspective longer than the others, but it did slide back and forth between Octavia and her father, and I'm not sure you intended to. It wasn't a jarring change, but neither did the shift accomplish conveying some information that only the change in perspective could illustrate. So it might do better to stay in one of the characters' heads. Keep in mind that limited narrators should reflect the perspective character's personality, intelligence, vocabulary, and voice, yet as you switch from one to the other, the narration sounds identical. You're not creating distinctive voices for the two. Often, when I say this to an author, they reply that they didn't realize they were using a limited narrator or sometimes don't understand the term, so it may be that this is all unintentional. It's more difficult to write an omniscient narrator than most people think it is. But you really have the feeling of a limited narrator in this story, for better or for worse, and it's not creating the effect it should.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2511

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

You want to make a good first impression and there are a couple things early on. It's kind of cliched to ask rhetorical questions in the synopsis, plus you misspelled "screencapped." On into the story, and you used "happily" twice in the first paragraph. The second one is fine, but the first one and the "basking in their delight, hoping someday maybe this would be her and her own fun-loving stallion" is kind of blunt with the emotional portrayal. Rather than outright narrate what characters think or feel, it's often better to demonstrate it through their appearance and behavior. If you were an actor, how would you sell "happy" to the audience? You can just say you are. What actions would you take? How would you make yourself look?

There's also this thing we call "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome," or LUS, where you use excessive phrases like "the carrot farmer" instead of a pronoun or the character's name. For one thing they just repeat information we already know, and for another, they often don't work with the perspective. For instance, it doesn't make sense for a first-person narrator to refer to himself with one of these, because nobody actually does that in their own thoughts. Neither would they do so about people they know well. Consider whether it's appropriate for the perspective, beyond sheer repetition.

Your opening few paragraphs use an awful lot of "to be" verbs, which are pretty boring. You want the story feeling active, especially at the beginning. It's impractical to eliminate them altogether, but it's worth trying to rephrase things and reduce them where possible.

>Still, Ponyville still//

Watch that close word repetition.

>‘Til//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they think you're trying to use a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way. Just be on the watch for this throughout the story.

>was...more//

It formats better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it begins a sentence.

>but it sure startled Applebloom as she returned home from school.//

Why is Apple Bloom being brought into this? It comes out of nowhere.

>looking very tired, a bit sad, but massively relieved//

There's that bluntness again. Describe her in a way that I'll figure out she's sad and tired and relieved without ever using the words. Maybe she's slouching, has red eyes, and won't make eye contact. Those are just a few examples, but it's more engaging when the reader can infer the emotion from the behavior than when the narrator just says what it is.

>Golden sighed deeply. She started as if she were about to speak, then stopped. Rocky gave his sister a questioning look, to which Golden nodded.//

You're starting to get it here. Aside from the "questioning look," their emotions are apparent without you ever stating what they are.

>With sad but sincere encouragement//

Very blunt again. I hope I've given you enough examples that you know what to look for now, since I won't ever finish if I keep marking every one of these.

>...what??//

One question mark is plenty, and since she's not completing an earlier suspended sentence, go ahead and capitaliz this.

>Golden, or as of now, Carrot Top//

When did she change it back? You made it sound like a product of the marriage, and she's not divorced yet.

>somepony who had an enormous burden had been lifted from her shoulders//

The wording is off here.

>Carrot soothed//

That's a really odd choice of speaking verb. If you get too outlandish, it stands out as weird, plus the grammar doesn't quite work anyway. "Soothe" would take the person or things being soothed as its direct object, not the speech that does so.

>ever?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, include a question mark or exclamation mark attached to it in the italics.

>with the same stunned expression she had for that exchange//

I think you're trying to use an omniscient narrator, and for the most part you are, but there are some limited elements here and there. Depending on which you actually intend, passages like this may not fit. If you're using limited narrator, you're having her evaluate her own facial expression, which she can't see.

>“I sure hope you don’t have any of those coming up.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>demi-sec or doux//

This is a handwritten letter. How exactly would he indicate the italics? People just don't do this. If he wanted to emphasize something, people would typically do that with all caps or bold or underlining, but nobody creates this kind of italic effect in handwriting.

>three-hundred//

>two-hundred to five-hundred//
>five-hundred//
Hyphens don't go there.

>And don’t you dare bake or decorate those cakes while Pound or Pumpkin are awake or could be.//

I'm not sure she's being specific enough. Just because the party is raunchy doesn't mean the cake is. It might just say "Congratulations" on it. Who cares if the kids see that?

>out...,//

The ellipsis counts as end punctuation. Don't use a comma with it.

I don't get why Pinkie has to give the party. If Mrs. Cake is so insistent that they can't back out of it, let her throw it. She'd be motivated to, since she's the one who claims not doing so would threaten the business's reputation.

>“No, I’m not denying that’s how I feel about the whole thing. I just don’t think that’s wise, or would be well-received.//

Missing your closing quotes again.

>Gummy licked Pinkie’s eye this time//

You've started 4 of the last 5 paragraphs with his name. It gets fairly repetitive.

>Princess Celestia graced Ponyville with the best sunrise the fief had seen in a decade//

Not sure I'd characterize the town as a fief. This isn't a feudal system.

Now this scene where Mrs. Cake wakes up in the morning is definitely done as a limited narrator. The narration takes on speech affecetations and expresses Mrs. Cake's opinions for her. It's possible to switch between omniscient and limited, but there's no clear effect you're going for, so I'm not sure what it's accomplishing. You might want the whole thing to be limited.

>mostly-congealed//

This is the exception to compound modifiers. When you have a two-word phrase starting in an -ly adverb, it doesn't take a hyphen.

>True love lays//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to keep straight.

>cake....//

Just use three dots. There's a specific use for four, but it's in formal nonfiction writing. There are other places you do this.

>Back in her room//

See it's a little odd that you did that scene in Mrs. Cake's perspective, then you have the "camera" leave the room without her. It's possible to do this, but it works better if you then ease into a limited narration in the new character's perspective, but you stay omniscient once you follow Pinkie.

>better!!?//

One of each kind of punctuation will do.

>while sat on the bed in a similar posture//

Missing word.

>nervous tick//

In that sense, it's typically spelled "tic."

>because that cake made her come talk to me and set the record straight//

Did it, though? Wasn't she already coming over before she saw it?

>the infant laying on her back//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>head’s-up//

That doesn't have an apostrophe.

Really, there are only three things here. The first is how blunt much of the emotional content is. I gave a brief discussion of that already, but there's another at the top of this thread under "show versus tell" that might help you.

The second is that it feels odd to have only the one scene with Mrs. Cake, who's a secondary character to all this, be the only one that's in a clear limited perspective. Most of the rest of the story feels omniscient, with a few hints of limited scattered around.

The last is that Pinkie's change of heart is kind of underwhelming. She struggles with how to give this party through the whole story, and she has a huge change of heart in just a couple quick paragraphs. I think it'd help to draw that out more, maybe have it happen gradually over more of the scene instead of all at once. Or at least have her need to think about it first instead of just making a snap decision that it's okay. Is it really a change for her, though? She could just as easily be giving in for Carrot Top's sake, since she doesn't seem to have learned anything or come to some new realization. Really she doesn't because of this line:
>I can’t say great, because of why we were there, but it was good.//
So what's really going on here? She's happy she completed the task that Mrs. Cake browbeat her into taking? Or that she's glad she could help a friend through a difficult time? (By the way, a lawyer picking her up as a client at this party, even with his supposed discount rate he's offering, just screams "ambulance chaser" to me.) It's not clear exactly what resolution she's come to, how she rationalizes it, and how that makes her feel, and it wouldn't take much to form one. This story's on the right track.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2516

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I am the protege//

To be really technical, a female is a protegee.

>one of the Elements of harmony that protects//

Subject-verb number mismatch: Elements protects. Also note that it's standard to capitalize "Harmony" in this term.

>Pre-classical//

Both words would be capitalized.

>today as a Cutie Mark or Stud Stamp today//

Watch that close word repetition.

>a couple of unicorn//

Typo.

>An action for those far beyond his station, he knew just what sort of punishment he was in for. Instead of turning him in//

I have no idea what that first phrase is trying to say, and as it's worded, it all describes "he," which doesn't seem right.

>pegasi freelance group//

Noun adjuncts are singular. For instance, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches." You're also inconsistent about when you choose to capitalize the names of the pony races.

>two-and-two//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>As soon as he switched places with our lead pony, an earth pony named Stout Haul//

He just got finished saying that the pegasi considered him the only thing holding them back from just flying to their destination. That argument doesn't hold water if there are other non-pegasi there, and it's curious that someone as sharp as Star Swirl wouldn't point that out.

>They also don't seem to be bothered at by any form of cold weather at all.//

There's an extraneous word here.

>Frigid Pulled//

Extraneous capitalization.

>that If the beasts power came from it's eyes//

Extraneous capitalization, missing apostrophe, and its/it's confusion.

>As I charged around the side of the cart I charged//

More close repetition.

>The moment I sighted the creature I knew that I was going to be in danger as well, but if my timing was right my spell would go off regardless, and blind the creature.//

You have the comma usage backward here, and this turns up here and there throughout the story. "but if my timing was right" is a dependent clause, so it'd normally be set off with a comma, and "my spell would go off regardless and blind the creature" doesn't need a comma between an ordinary compound verb.

>The flash of light was enough to charge the atmosphere and lightly singe everything unlucky enough to be in direct contact with the light.//

More close repetition.

>his his//

Repeated word.

>it's body//

It's/its confusion again. I suspect this will be a recurring problem. If you don't want it to expand to "it is" or "it has," don't use an apostrophe. No possessive pronouns have them.

>I'm not sure If//

Another extraneous capitalization. This also seems to be a recurring issue, and I'm not sure why it's happened twice with this word.

>which is why I've exchanged Basilisk meat for some cactus pulp//

But he doesn't mention basilisk at all. He's crossed out cockatrice.

>Twilight set down her quill with a sigh.//

I have to say it's really weird that the entire chapter so far has been a brief scene of Twilight writing something herself, then a bunch of things she's transcribed. And then we get this tiny narrated scene that's completely out of that pattern. It's fine to blend real action and written records, but when the former occupies barely a couple percent of the chapter, it makes me wonder if it's really necessary to do it at all. And sure enough, nothing of any consequence happens in this scene. If you just want it to break up the letters, then you need to make a pattern of it and do this more often.

>Pagasi//

Typo.

>The family consists solely of the father//

You're either missing a line break and indentation, or you didn't intend to start a new paragraph here.

I'm starting to wonder why the entries are just numbered and not dated. Is that Twilight's doing or Star Swirl's? Either way, it's odd that Star Swirl wouldn't catalogue the dates, and if he did, it's odd for Twilight to omit them.

>I left for the Stone's home//

Assuming that's a family (because it would be odd to put "the" in front of an individual), that should be plural: Stones'.

>offerings they were offering//

Repetition.

>I think I might need change up some things//

Missing word.

>manages a complex of a task as running a mining operation//

Typo.

>interested on//

Usually, it's interested "in."

>spell. Their spell wasn't just a basic clairvoyance spell//

Quite repetitive.

>in such high regards//

That phrase is usually rendered as singular.

>pegesai//

Spelling.

>At least that's what I was told, my hoof still passed cleanly through it//

That comma is a splice.

>a pegasi//

Mixing singular and plural there.

>exempt myself to//

Usually, it's exempt "from."

>together, a boon considering I've never attempted to sew anything together//

Repetition.

>one whose standing is in as such a questionable position as my own//

The normal phrasing would be "in such a questionable position" or "as questionable a position."

>There is only so many spells//

Number mismatch: is spells.

>would be hear//

Homophone confusion.

>that I'm not able of assisting//

Really awkward phrasing.

>before I venturing//

Something got jumbled there.

>I learn//

Verb tense is off.

>some adults talking about swarm arriving//

>while galloping towards the proved to be quite difficult//
Missing word.

>Fireflies//

Sometimes, you just use "Firefly" as the plural, so be consistent.

>I'm told that, luckily, that//

Redundant "that."

>just going to completely cover my next uniform in bells, just//

Repetition, and this is a common word for authors to overuse. You have 21 in the chapter, which isn't awful, but they occur in clusters.

>If i never see that magic flower again//

Capitalization.

>Also, instead//

Extraneous spaces.

>the head pegasi in charge about the matter. He//

So is it multiple pesagi or just the one?

>less that understanding//

Typo.

>"Another section complete." she thought to herself//

Punctuation. When a quote would end with a period and you want to transition into a speech tag, the period gets changed to a comma.

>Pinkie Pie burst the the front door//

Repeated word.

>and-//

Please use a proper dash. There's a guide to the at the top of this thread.

>"delicate..."//

By the way you've punctuated the paragraph, this is a separate sentence. It needs to be capitalized.

>That's alright Pinkie.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Either way It//

Extraneous capitalization.

>7 Layer//

This would have a hyphen. I'm a little curious about how the subtleties of taste work here. Opal and fire opal are just hydrated quartzes, amethyst is a variety of quartz, and obsidian is mostly quartz. Sapphire and ruby are the same mineral.

>make something out the most random assortment of elements//

Missing word.

>Where would one even find an oven powerful enough to melt Fire Opal anyway?//

Any oven suitable for glass blowing would do the trick. Point taken that this isn't a household thing, buy neither is it something exceedingly rare. A blacksmith could probably accommodate them, too. Sapphire and ruby would take far more heat to melt. For that matter, parts of the resipe don't make sense. It's "7 layer," yet there are 8 ingredients. I figured one would be a garnish on top, but the directions make no mention of such. But if the oven is hot enough to melt the fire opal, everything but the sapphire and ruby would melt, too. I can see wanting to serve the whole thing hot, but it the top layer should be the only melted one, it may be necessary to cook it separately and put it on afterward, or else use something like a blowtorch or broiler that can heat just the top.

>That can only mean that whatever it is that's going on, It must be big. Very Big.//

Yes, and he just said so a couple sentences before. This is redundant. There's also another extraneous capitalization.

>enchant the soldiers armor//

Missing apostrophe.

>They think that once the flames are dealt with they can deal with the dragons other dangerous bits.//

Missing comma, missing apostrophe, repetitive phrasing.

>no two materials seem hold the enchantment spells//

Missing word.

>pony kind//

This would be one word, like "mankind."

>The gems would be prohibitive based on the price alone//

Well, that depends, doesn't it? Some ores are more valuable than gems, either because of what they contain or because of scarcity (particularly to collectors).

>A gem, appropriately called Fire Opal, seems to be able to hold the ward most effectively, followed closely by Rubies.//

This makes me wonder what actually holds the enchantment. The only difference between ruby and corundum is trace amounts of chromium. Sapphire is also corundum, so it has various other trace impurities, but apparently chromium is the key one. Without any reason given for valuing this method of incorporating chromium versus any other (for example, carbon steel, where carbon enhances the steel's strength while leaving it malleable), why not just use pure chromium?

>long distance flight//

long-distance flight

>Those few ponies that have chosen//

When talking about sentient creatures, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>much the surrounding countryside//

Missing word.

>low hanging//

>close range//
Hyphenate.

>should they wear off during the fight//

Set this off with a comma.

>that It would//

Why do you keep capitalizing that word in the middle of sentences?

>anypony not involved//

How appropriate this is depends on how you intend it to be presented. Star Swirl wouldn't have italicized the word in his original writings, so has Twilight changed that for her transcription of it? The reason I say Star Swirl wouldn't have is because that's not what people do in handwriting. When adding emphasis, they'd typically use all caps, darken it (essentially, bold font), or underline it. How would someone differentiate between italics and normal font in handwriting? Print one and use cursive for the other? That'd be odd.

>The stuff they brought is actually pretty good, too bad I'll need to keep a clear head before the assault.//

Comma splice.

>Crush the Candies until a fine powder remains and place them in the silk bag. Thinly slice the orange and lemon//

Try to make sure you're consistent about capitalization. I don't know why you'd need to capitalize them all in the ingredients list anyway, but you're only intermittently doing the same thing in the directions.

>Earth pony//

If you're going to capitalize races (and you don't, as you almost always use "pegasi" in lower-case), get both of these words. Just capitalizing "Earth" makes it refer to our planet.

>you Do not//

More extraneous capitalization. I really can't imagine what's making you do this.

>I-It's//

Who would actually write a stutter in a journal? This is a speaking affectation, not something he'd actually write down.

>Things then went from bad to worse, the entire plan for the ambush was now out the window.//

Comma splice.

>The group that Frigid and I were a part of, was one of the last to enter the cave.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>I skid//

You keep switching tenses in this scene.

>I managed to hook my foreleg over some scrub bush before tumbling over the edge. Frigid managed to//

Repetitive sentence openers there.

>side, his right wing hanging uselessly by his side, damaged in the attack. I tried to pull us both up, but the long-dead plant threatened to pull//

Repetition of "side" and "pull."

>The small support team, which were ordered to stay out of the fight at my insistence, was//

A collective word like "team" can be considered singular or plural, depending on the circumstances, but you play it as both in the same sentence, as you give it "were" and "was" as verbs.

>low lying//

Hyphenate.

>lets loose it's flaming breath//

Its/it's confusion.

>one quicker pegasi//

If it's one, then why is it plural?

>tackling me away from molten puddle//

Missing word.

>divvy it out//

I've only ever heard it as divvy "up," not "out."

>themself//

No such word. I'd say to use "themselves," but we already know it's about Star Swirl, so why not use "himself"?

>alone If//

Another extraneous capitalization.

>she became worried//

You already said she was.

>Through Penny's console//

Don't you mean "consolation"? Otherwise, it sounds like he's using her control panel to do something.

>After I had calmed down and ordered the search to be called off.//

Doesn't seem like the place for a sentence fragment. It's not a coherent thought.

>state when//

Extraneous space that I assume is supposed to be a comma.

>noticed My bell//

And another extraneous capitalization.

>fight It//

Why do you keep doing that?

>It didn't even make the same melodic sound anymore, only a dull, sorrowful song could be heard from it now.//

Comma splice.

>self serving//

Hyphenate.

>The title now belongs to the pegasi who saved my life after the fight//

You keep using "pegasi" as a singular term.

>He's still little young//

Missing word.

>in anyway possible//

"Anyway" and "any way" aren't interchangeable. You do need it to be two words here.

>Could I have saved my friend.//

Isn't that a question?

>only think they know//

Another odd use of italics in something handwritten.

>a horns//

Typo.

>I noticed that her smaller sister//

He just used "I noticed" in the previous sentence.

>that It was//

>only If they//
srsly

>The mystery of the list//

This really confused me. I was trying to figure out what I'd missed earlier in the story until I figured out it's what comes after this. You ought to explain a bit about Twilight finding the list. It's weird to make a big plot point out of it when the reader has no idea what you're talking about, then show me the list afterward. Well, you did start with this last chapter, but you didn't call it a list or make a big deal out of it being a mystery, so it didn't immediately occur to be. It'd only take a little rewording up front to make sure it's clear what you're referring to.

>twilight//

Capitalization.

>That could only mean that each of the sets must represent something in particular, a pattern of sorts, and if she could find out what each of the sets represented then, she hoped, the sets would form something with more meaning.//

That's an awful lot of repetitive language.

This wasn't a bad story. The writing was fine, and it had an interesting enough plot. There are a few issues which should be clear, from all the editing stuff I pointed out multiple times to the lack of dates on the entries. It's not that the dates themselves would be so important. If one's March 23, that doesn't necessarily mean anything to me. But it does make a difference how long it's been since the previous entry. There are a few times he addresses that, but it's rare. And for a number of the entries, it'd imply quite a bit about the story's action whether two entries came a single day apart or a long time apart.

The big thing for me is that the whole thing feels so disconnected. It's not surprising, since it's in the middle of a continuity of several stories, and we're wary of posting sequels and such, since they often require the reader to know things from earlier entries. That seems to be the case here, to a degree. It's understandable enough what these events are that Star Swirl is documenting. I don't feel like there's some back story to it that I'm missing in terms of wondering what's happening in the first place. I might be missing what gives it some greater meaning, though.

So we start out with Star Swirl learning kinds of magic that he's not supposed to know, both because he wants to learn it for its own sake and because he wants to document it. This gets him ostracized, and during his wanderings, he gets assigned to this task force, and they eventually are ordered to kill a dragon. The pony who'd served as his only friend on the trip goes missing in the fight.

That's all well and good, but what did any of it mean? We see a little character development for Star Swirl in his attitudes toward Frigid and Penny, but he doesn't make a big deal out of it. It's hard to assign much importance to the loss of Frigid when Star Swirl himself doesn't say that much about it. His actions in searching for him beyond when it was reasonable to do so at least show a level of devotion, but he's writing about it in his personal journal, where he puts private thoughts that nobody else can see, and he's not going to expound on how it hurts, how much he misses Frigid, or anything? His actions and what he decides to write aren't very consistent. And then he doesn't come to any conclusion based on it. He and Penny don't come to any new understanding in their relationship, for instance.

All of these events don't share some kind of thematic tie, and then you keep adding more and more without any of it ever leading anywhere. Learning magic, the fight with the dragon, the appearance of alicorns, the hidden code. They all stack up, but without any of it coming to a resolution or good stopping point. While it's fine for a story in a series to do something like this, as long as the reader is keeping up with it, that doesn't make it a good entry point for a new reader, and without the first story being on Equestria Daily already, it's not a good place to send new readers. Plus a story should be mostly self-contained in some arc, yet every plot thread here goes unresolved. In short, it would need to stand alone well, and it just doesn't. I will say that this one is a far more convincing example of a journal than the one you sent in last time.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2521

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Desperate hooves raced over the bare soil; a drumroll of violent urgency.//

The semicolon isn't used right. You should be able to replace one with a period and have the resulting two sentences atand as complete.

>Thunder boomed in the distance, a warning of things to come.//

It already did. It feels like this is a deliberate repetition, one you're doing for effect, but there are ways to make it obvious that it's intentional. One is to have it appear at least three times, so it's clearly thematic, particularly if there's a symbolic meaning to it. Another is to use words like "still" or "again" to call attention to the repetition. Here, though, it's odd to state it's a warning of things to come, since it already thundered, and nothing happened since the last one. If it just now made AJ think of that, then fine, but then have the narrator communicate that.

Your narration is getting really mixed here. On the side of omniscient, you're doing things like this:
>the pragmatic mare//
—making external references to the characters. AJ wouldn't call herself this, after all.
or this:
>Right now, all she cared about was finding her little sister, Apple Bloom.//
This is also more from an external viewpoint. AJ would have strong feelings about this sentence, but it's delivered dispassionately, as a factual statement. Plus it defines her sister, which AJ wouldn't need to do.

That's all fine, but we also have some indicators that you want to use a limited narrator, like these:
>Tired. Terrified.//
The narration takes on a conversational tone here. This is decidedly informal, so it would seem to represent AJ's internal impressions more.
>Had something happened to her? Was she hurt somewhere in the woods? Did a timber wolf attack?//
And here's the kicker. The narrator is presenting AJ's thoughts as if his own. These are AJ's questions, but the narrator's the one asking them.

So you need to figure out what kind of narrator you want and stick to it. I get the feeling you're trying for an omniscient narrator, but they're a lot harder to write than most people think they are.

>t never before had the place she’d called home seem so alien to her.//

Typo.

>It’s as if she had stepped into some warped version of the farm.//

"It's" doesn't mean "it was," only "it is" (or "it has"), so you're switching tenses here.

>You do not belong here, the alien forest seemed to be saying to her. Leave, NOW!//

For the stuff that's being presented as imaginary dialogue, either put it in quotes or italicize it.

>sprawled//

Odd thing for a hat to do, since it can't change its shape.

>“Apple Bloom?” She called out.//

>“Applejack?” The tiny voice replied.//
Dialogue tag capitalization. Keep an eye out for these, as there are others.

>Hang on, sis!//

As a term of address, family relations get capitalized.

>with vices crawling up its sides//

I assume you meant "vines"?

>half-boarded up//

You don't need the hyphen here. It changes the meaning, since what immediately follows the hyphenated phrase isn't what it describes.

>She could smell putrid water//

Depending on what type of narrator you want, consider that this kind of phrasing works against a limited narrator. You use these verbs of perception in other places, too. The point is that if you're using a limited narrator, the character and the narrator are essentially the same. In that case, you don't need to say the character saw something, for instance. It's enough for the narrator to describe it, because if he can see it to do so, the character must have seen it, too.

>of…well//

It formats better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence.

>she began to cry.//

That's not a dialogue tag, so it needs to be capitalized.

>Applejack knew it was only a matter of time//

This is the same idea as the perception verbs. The narrator also knows the same things as AJ, so it's enough for the narrator to say it, and it's implicit that AJ knows. The same is true for verbs like wonder, wish, want, think, hope.

>Glancing around, Applejack naturally focused on the discarded rope.//

Keep in mind that participles imply simultaneous action, but she's don glancing around if she's focused on the rope.

>coy fish//

That's a really, really odd word choice. Are you sure you didn't mean "koi"? Even then, they're more known for being domesticated, which wouldn't put very many of them in the path of a tsunami, certainly less than any given ocean fish.

>Like feeding a wire through a wall//

Why are you comparing it to that? It's not like that at all. She doesn't have to force the rope down the well. It'll go under its own weight.

>felt a taunt pull//

Typo. I presume "taut" is what you wanted, but that's an odd fit here.

>Ah saw a flash.”

>
>“That would be the thunder,”//
Well, no, that would be the lightning.

>Perhaps there was some water left in the well.//

Wait. If it's full enough that she could reach Applejack by floating, why would she have had to feed so much rope into the well? It's really inconsistent, and she'd already come up with a plausible explanation for how Apple Bloom could be so close. Why add this one?

>Her wide eyes were filled with confusion and apprehension//

Emotion comes across far more effectively when I have to interpret it myself, not when the character or narrator interprets it for me and gives me their conclusion. Show me the evidence Applejack uses to deduce this. What's Apple Bloom's posture? Her facial expression? Her behavior? Let me be an observer, and only say what I can perceive about her, not what emotions tohse perceptions would support. In a very simple example, it's the difference between saying someone is happy and that he smiled.

>looked like she’d just been through Tartarus, Apple Bloom looked none worse for the wear.//

Watch that close word repetition, but this is odd, too. She looks like hell, but she looks like she's none the worse for wear.

>AJ spoke as if she’d never seen her before.//

And that sounds awfully familiar for an omniscient narrator. Even if it's limited Applejack wouldn't call herself that, so it'd seem to have shifted to Apple Bloom's perspective.

>Trapped animals did it all the time; chewing off their legs so that they may escape.//

Another misused semicolon. A period, dash, or colon would be fine.

>Whatever had her felt ambiguous.//

That's a really bland description for the situation.

>NOT//

For these places you use all caps, it's preferred to use italics for emphasis.

>Her eyes wide, Applejack skidded away on her back, putting as much distance between her and the well as possible.//

Seems odd that she's basically leaving Apple Bloom to fend for herself.

>Her sister was in a better frame of mind.//

That's also rather vague and bland.

>Half-dazed and barely coherent, instinct took hold//

This says that instinct was half-dazed and barely coherent.

>It was always patient.//

And then at the end, you go into the creature's perspective.

This was a nice little story. Plenty of effective horror. My only issue is with te perspective, and I've pointed out a few examples of it. If you still have questions about that, please feel free to ask. It might be quicker to do so in this thread.

In addition, I'll point out that, as the saying goes, the scariest monster is the one you never see. You either took that to heart or lucked into it, but either way, it's there. Until the end, that is. I won't make you change it, so just take this as a strong suggestion. I think the story would be significantly more effective if you removed the last two paragraphs. For one thing, as I already noted, it's an odd and unnecessary change of perspective. For another, it undoes a lot of the work you already did in creating this unknown horror. You've made it far less unknown. Before, we had no idea what it was. Something intelligent? A mindless creature who'd learned to mimic speech patterns that would lure in prey without actually understanding what it says? There was no way to tell. And that's why it's scary. Now you've really narrowed down the field, and the more familiar it becomes, the less scary it is. In fact, by putting the last couple of paragraphs in its perspective, you've even allowed me access to its thoughts, and when you do that, you invite the reader to fill in personality where it isn't defined. Often, the reader will use his own, so even more familiarity.

So I think you need to get a handle on whether you wanted to use an omniscient or limited narrator, scrub the story to make it conform to that choice, and I'd recommend taking off the last two paragraphs.

For that matter, readers are always going to say they want a sequel, but it's not always a good idea. Here, it's for the same reasons I stated. The more you explain, the more the reader has it figured out, and the less scary it is. Lovecraft explained a lot, too, but he managed to create such a pervasively dreadful atmosphere that he could afford to. You don't create an atmosphere quite like he does. He's more about setting and happenings that are obviously wrong, while you have a storm, and while it may be a stronger one than normal, it's still a fairly routine occurrence. Everything that's supposed to be eerie derives only from the storm, until Applejack gets to the well. I just don't think a sequel is going to improve things and may well reduce the creppiness factor this story had going. It's possible to make it work, but it's not easy. I can't keep you from writing one, of course, but you ought to consider how well it would work. Maybe try finding examples of stories or movies where the sequel managed to keep up the tension of the original, especially if it's one of this type where you never see the monster.

I wouldn't need to give it a full re-read—I'd just want to check how you do with the perspective, so you can mark it as "back from Mars" when you're ready to resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2523

>She puffed out her chest and looked proud.//
The puffed-out chest already makes her look proud. You're essentially repeating yourself.

>fixin’ lots and lots of repairs to the barn//

That's still a nonsensical phrase.

>the it’s tricky//

Something got messed up there.

>thoroughly unconvinced//

And that's still in here too. You use the exact same phrasing just a few paragraphs apart, and about the same character. It's very repetitive.

>She watched the two adventurers wander off, and pursed her lips in heavy thought.//

You have a lot of spots on both sides of this general rule. You use a comma with a conjunction if there's a new clause, so there has to be both a new verb and a new subject. here, you only have a new verb, so you don't need the comma. If you did have a new subject, like "She watched the two adventurers wander off, and she pursed her lips in heavy thought." then one would be warranted.

>So you—” She reached and tapped Daring Do on the chest. “—need me.”//

I showed you last time how to punctuate and capitalize an aside like that. Lose the first period, and "she" should be lower-case.

>too concerned. The trees were too close together for Daring to fly without wasting too //

Pretty close quarters to be using that word three times.

>Daring knelt low and brushed the greenery away from it’s base.//

Its/it's confusion. What you have would expand to "Daring knelt low and brushed the greenery away from it is base."

>Inside the stonework seemed to glow//

When you have a word that can either be an adverb or a preposition, it's better to set off the adverb version with a comma so the two won't get confused. Here, "inside the stonework" could be a prepositional phrase.

>from her saddlebags and held it up to the Daring//

Not sure what you're trying to say here.

What's really bogging down the second chapter is how repetitive a lot of the descriptions sound. Look how often you use light, sunlight, and crystal. There are other words you can use for these, but we keep getting the same one over and over again.

>brow furrowed in confusion//

You rarely need these "in/with/of emotion" phrases. Like this one, they're almost always redundant with some other description already in the sentence.

>hold her saddlebags in place//

You just used "hold her in place" two sentences ago.

>Cairo’s magic held her in place//

Huh? At the end of the last chapter, he disappeared. How's his magic still holding them?

>The cats snarled and leapt//

They just leapt a bit ago.

>“Ah, horseapples!”//

>“Rainbow Dash! Ah can’t jump that!”//
>“Dash! Help!”//
Unless the vast majority of a quote is italicized, leave the quotation marks in regular font. Besides, you want the opening and closing ones to match. I trust you can find the rest of these.

>Without bothering to check who was yelling//

Set this off with a comma.

>The trees cleared suddenly and bright sunlight stunned her for a second.//

>When she opened her eyes again the ground in front of her fell away//
>When she looked down she saw the faintest snaking white line//
>She scrambled to get her weight onto solid ground but there was nothing beneath her hooves to push against.//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>an audible crunch//

As opposed to an inaudible crunch?

>satisfying crunch//

There was just a crunch in the previous paragraph.

>Twilight leapt behind a boulder to watch//

There's an awful lot of leaping going on in this chapter. This is already the 5th, and there are 4 more, all still in the first half of the chapter.

>The Pegasus’ ears perked up.//

You've been using Applejack as your perspective character. Why would she refer to Dash like this? She knows her very well. You don't think about your good friends using descriptors like this, do you? Keep an eye out for these, as I see others.

>Sugarcube//

She uses this as a generic term of endearment, so it wouldn't be capitalized.

>The Pegasus’ body was locked with tension and she had a grin on her face.//

Another odd reference, and another spot where you need a comma. If it helps, there a brief guide to comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>The cat howled louder than Rose would’ve thought possible, and leapt into the air.//

And here't the opposite issue. These aren't separate clauses, so you don't need the comma.

>—then//

Not sure why this warrants a dash, but even so, it's not picking up and earlier suspended sentence, so capitalize it.

>she felt a surge of pride//

Don't be so blunt, specially when she goes on to express it more subtly anyway.

>small gullies and the occasional bunch of small//

Watch that repetition.

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they think you want a single opening quote. You can paste one it the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. Keep an eye out for these as well.

>a canvas stretched up and over the whole site//

You pretty much already said that.

>She let out a breath she hadn’t realized she’d been holding//

This is very, very cliched. Very.

>The Unicorn finished her discussion returned to her seat//

Missing word.

>Unrolled across the ground were three bedrolls, messily unmade and empty//

You just descibed there being a pile of bedrolls, which is either contradictory, or it means they have quite a few spares. Either one is odd.

>a quad of boots//

I love this.

>Nor she could//

Got those out of order.

>canvass//

This is a real word, but I suspect it's not the one you wanted.

>Fully expecting to slam into a pony’s face, the open air and bright sun stunned her.//

This says that the open air and bright sun was fully expecting to slam into a pony's face.

>and although she couldn’t see the Unicorn’s horn//

Needs a comma here.

>Boss-pony//

If you're treating that like a name, capitalize both words.

Dash uses an awful lt of colons in her limited narration, and it just doesn't suit her well. I can't imagine she even knows how to use them like this.

>She sighed in relief.//

There you go identifying her emotion again.

>Before she could launch herself into the clearing a hoof grabbed at her tail.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. You're missing a lot of these.

>in frustration//

Another of those prepositional phrases that are rarely necessary.

>yanked. Daring popped free and sent them both rolling into a nearby tree. Rose was up first, and yanked//

Watch the repetition.

>Once the sky was clear she and Daring turned and hurried off at a right angle.//

Another spot that needs a comma.

>surprised at how thirsty she could get in such a humid environment//

What does that have to do with it? Humidity makes you sweat less effective, meaning you have to sweat more to get the same cooling effect, so it dehydrates you quicker. If you're not active, dry air might dehydrate you quicker, but it makes perfect sense to me that she'd be thirsty.

>She sighed, and pulled her head out of her saddlebags.//

And you don't need a comma there.

>Unlike the watchtower, she wanted this to be more of an obelisk: straighter, with a square base, and narrower; no visible entrance; and ornate carvings up each face to the top, capped with a dazzling pyramidal peak.//

That semicolon's misused, but let me go back to my complaint about how many colons you use in Dash's limited narration. They fit Twilight, but by using so many for both, you're making their character voicing awfully similar. You want your characters to be distinct.

>Daring whooped with excitement//

You really like those emotion prepositional phrases. Most times, they can simply be cut without losing anything.

>keep up, keeping//

>posts circled the clearing, like the posts//
More repetition.

>The bottom started to wobble and vertigo took her for a second.//

Needs a comma.

>but . . . ” She trailed off//

The ellipsis already tells me she trailed off. You don't need to repeat the obvious in the narration.

>playing close attention//

Typo.

>rock over the edge; several seconds later they heard the faintest knockings of rock on rock//

Surely there's way to rephrase that so you don't have to use the same word three times.

>a little ways//

A common phrasing, but the proper form is to use "way" as singular.

>“By taking the stairs?” Daring suggested, pointing.//

This is the second time you've had Dash unable to carry her. But the show has her capable of carrying a single pony easily. Dash carried Rarity and several Wonderbolts in "Sonic Rainboom." Dash dangles Applejack from the end of the tug-of-war rope in "Fall Weather Friends."

>gauged it’s distance//

Its/it's confusion.

>ahead. Rose carefully walked forward, keeping an eye on the ground ahead//

Repetition.

>finer grained//

Hyphenate.

>and she hit terminal velocity so quickly that she didn’t notice any freefall.//

There's not a huga amount of vaiation in how long it takes to do so, and it's not that quick. You cited 15 meters as the depth; I don't think she could even get to terminal velocity in that distance.

>head first//

That's one word.

>knocked loose. She was pretty lucky to have avoided being knocked//

Repetition. I'm seeing a lot more of it in this chapter. I wonder if you haven't edited this one very much.

>Her eyes had adjusted to the low light and she could make out the battered, dirty stetson in her hoofs.//

Needs a comma, and "Stetson" is a proper noun. It's also kind of a fandom conceit, as it's not really the kind of hat she wears.

>She still looked angry, but there was a hint of concern there, too.//

>Her anger and frustration//
You're being blunt with the emotion again.

>don’t it again//

Missing a word.

>Clearly uncomfortable//

If it's so clear, why don't I get to see it?

>They had a matriarchal society; they sent their colts and fillies from home when they were old enough to defend themselves; they sacrificed ponies to ward off the night; and their magic was based more on superstition than actual science.//

None of those list items have their own internal commas, so this doesn't really warrant using semicolons as your separator.

>shoving close to where Rose was looking//

You're using "look" a fair amount lately. It's a word authors tend to overuse.

>pulled the crystal from Rose’s grasp, nearly pulling//

Repetition.

I have to say, the degree of profanity is odd here. They obviously don't use any on th show, but you're not doing anything grittier than show-tone here. It's a cute adventure, so it just feels like it doesn't fit.

>Clonk!//

It's preferred not to put sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2529

>>2523

I didn't get an email about this additional feedback and only just saw it. Thanks again for continued feedback, but I'm not sure I can bring the story to a level you want.

Some of the points you're bringing up are going to be present throughout the story. I agree with the vast majority of them. Some are definitely deal-breakers: spelling, wrong/extra words, etc. I've certainly tried going through with a spellchecker and even got someone to edit, and I spend lots of time rereading it--so at this point I think I just don't see the spelling anymore. I'd certainly like to find and fix spelling and simple grammar issues, but unless I find another editor I probably won't catch them. Likewise, I want to fix repeated or missing words, or instances where I have an action happen twice (cats leaping, for example.)

(I figured out the issue with smart quotes: When typing normally, the smart quotes work fine, but when using auto-correct on Android the smartquotes aren't used. So, typing "dont" autocorrects to "don't" instead of "don’t". Who knew?)

And a couple of the points I disagree with. Sometimes it feels like a style issue. I think run-ons and comma splices can add tension and speed to an action scene, as if the narrator can't quite finish his thoughts in time. I do indeed like those emotional prepositional phrases, and the redundant sound effects. It's an action story, and not meant to be efficient, minimalist prose. It's supposed to be fun to read.

But the real problem is that by the time you can get around to looking at it again, there's gonna be another chapter or two posted, and there's another ten or so left. Even if I keep up and fix all the mistakes, by the time it's good enough it'll all be posted. I very much wanted a boost in readers near the start to keep up comments and views throughout, rather than lumping them all on the last chapter. And I hate posting a chapter and then fixing it later -- none of the readers will see the corrections, so it's like wasted effort.

I know you're not likely to review the Google Docs before I've posted each chapter to FFN, and that's understandable. And the feedback you're giving me is excellent quality. My reviewer didn't catch these mistakes. But if it's not good enough to be submitted to the blog now, it probably won't be. Even if I go through each chapter and find badly-capitalized asides and remove colons from Dash's narration, there's always going to be more mistakes.

I really want to stress that you've been a great help. I've updated all four chapters, addressing nearly all of your feedback. I know I'm complaining. I spent three years working on this and I'm defensive. If you still like the story or think it can be fixed, I'd like to share the docs with you. The time you've put into helping suggests you want the story to succeed too. Otherwise, thank you for the help, criticisms, and suggestions.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2533

>>2529
The mechanical stuff isn't that big a deal here, as they're not prevalent enough to be a distraction when reading. It's more like removing a few speed bumps than the difference between the story being readable or not. So don't sweat that. I only went through the additional chapters because they were there; it wouldn't have made a difference to me if you'd resubmitted with the same chapters as before. I just figured I'd help out with the proofreading on them, since they were available for it. The point is more to make you aware and cognizant of them, so you'd be more likely to catch them as you write. Writing's always a learning process, after all.

It's also not a big deal whether you get a feature when you're almost done posting all the chapters or early on. For chaptered stories, I usually see a significant bump on the last chapter, so apparently lots of people wait until it's finished to start on it, probably because they don't want to be caught with a long hiatus or an abandoned story. It works a little differently on FiMFiction, where the most attention you get is when the story first gets published. On EqD, you get added to the story updates post whenever you add another chapter, and you get another solo post when the story is complete. So from that perspective, it's still worth it to resubmit while you have unposted chapters remaining. Also consider this: you have 445 views on the story so far. Adventure is a popular tag, and the central characters are all Mane 6. I predict you'd see 500-1000 additional views from EqD, and half of those might not come until you complete the story.

The earlier chapters are the most important ones. That's what draws the readers in, and we're not as concerned about subsequent chapters (though it's also important for the last chapter to be good, since it's the last impression). We sometimes see the story go up in quality with later chapters as the author gains experience, but we've also seen the quality go down, as the author's already surmounted the threshold of getting posted, so there's less payoff for staying vigilant.

To comma splices, I agree they can be used to good effect, but the trick is making it clear to the reader they're on purpose instead of mistakes. They show a level of preoccupation on the part of the perspective character, so give other evidence of that, like using sentence fragments, trailing off, getting cut off. Use another comma splice within the same paragraph. Or compound it and have three or four sentences tacked together as one giant run-on instead of just the standard two. Readers will quickly pick up on the fact that you're only doing this when the action really gets going, and they'll feel the effect.

Any time I left stuff for you to find on your own, it was for things easy to search. Like for the backward apostrophes, doing a Ctrl-f for a space followed by a single quote should allow you to spot-check all your leading apostrophes and see which ones are backward. Or looking for a double quotation mark before closing italics bbcode where it should come after. Really, once you're told you story is on Mars, you're all but a shoo-in to post. The toughest one to find on your own is probably the commas-between clauses thing, and that's not a big deal. If you fix up the proofreading stuff I mentioned (the specific instances I cited plus the ones I left you to do that are easy to search for, like the leading apostrophes) and the spots where there was a small logical inconsistency, that'd be good enough, and for a returning Mars, I'd get on it within a day or two (though it sometimes takes the blog folks several days to post it, but that doesn't affect the approval at all).

Edit: It hadn't sunk in that you said you'd already made changes. I'll get a head start in looking at them now, assuming you're done with whatever you intend to do. And don't worry about the difference in time between when I post reviews here and the email actually gets to you. We get copied on all emails, so I see when the actual reply goes out. The email actually hasn't been sent yet, as of the time I posted this, so you wouldn't have even known yet that this was a Mars verdict—that's in the email. But if the story checks out now, I'll go ahead and change it to a post recommendation.
This post was edited by its author on .

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2534

>>2533

Thanks for the encouraging words. I think I understand a lot better. Should I submit via the EqD form again, or does your edit imply that I don't have to, since you are going to look at it?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2535

>>2534
Normally, I'd say resubmit, but since you managed to get ahead of the email chain, I'll just go over this again under the previous submission.

And just so you'll have advance knowledge of it (and see how long it can take for emails to get routed by the folks who manage the mailboxes), here's the content of my reply:

Since you saw my response before you even got my email reply, I've had a look at your changes. I didn't give a full re-read, just looked at the specific excerpts I'd commented on before. I wish you'd handled more of the mechanical stuff in chapters 3 and 4, but there's nothing in them that comprises a serious problem to the plot or characterization, and as I said in my response on the thread, you could have resubmitted only the first two chapters, so I'm giving you some leeway in that I would have approved the story based on the condition of chapters 1-2 alone if I hadn't seen the rest. As such, the only corrections I'll offer are two missing-word ones, which you had even been willing to make in chapters 3-4. So all the stuff I noted for chapters 3 and 4 that you didn't address would make the story better, but I'll go ahead and approve it on the strength of the first two chapters.

chapter 1:
>She puffed out her chest strutted up in front of Applejack.//
Missing a word.

chapter 4:
>just don’t it again, right?//
Missing a word.

What I meant to cover in the email but didn't is the procedure for adding chapters to the EqD page. It's spelled out in the fanfiction documentation, but I'll go ahead and leave it here.

When you publish a new chapter, send an email to the main box, submit@equestriadaily.com, with a subject line of "STORY UPDATE: Daring Do and the Lost Tome of Shadows." In the body, include a link to the story's EqD page as well as the FiMFiction.net link to the new chapter you're adding. Your story will soon after be featured in one of the periodic story updates posts. When you've posted the last chapter, the process is the same, except use "STORY COMPLETE" instead of "STORY UPDATE" in the subject line, and the completed story will get another solo post.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2536

I'm only marking the first instance I see of each of these, but for most of them, there are more through the story.

>the bespectacled pale unicorn//

I probably mentioned this in your previous submission. In fact, I bet it'll have a lot of the same small issues. This phrase is describing someone the perspective character knows well, and you have a limited narration, so you're saying Sunset refers to Moondancer as such in her own head. That's not very plausible. I won't mark any more, but pay attention to these descriptors through the whole story and decide whether they're really appropriate for the perspective at the time. In a limited narration, they really only work when the perspective character is saying them about an unfamiliar character or to note something new about a character she knows already.

>fine tune//

Hyphenate.

>Moon Dancer gave her a flat stare and Sunset just laughed.//

Needs a comma.

>“Yes, mom,”//

As terms of address, family relations would be capitalized.

>“Good!” Sunset praised.//

That speaking verb doesn't quite work, as its direct object would be the person receiving the praise, not the words of praise themselves.

>Celestia’s sun//

Oh god no. This is very, very cliched. You might as well say it was a dark and stormy night. And a single tear ran down her cheek. And she released a breath she didn't know she'd been holding.

>she brought it to lips//

Missing word.

>‘just one more spell’d//

Stick an "e" in there, just lik you would for any normal past-tense verb.

>a—“//

Dashes can sometimes turn closing quotation marks backward. I see more of these later in the story.

>only to instantly come crashing down//

She just crashed a bit ago. And onto "soft carpet" which kind of doesn't fit the word choice too well.

>if worst came to worst//

if worse came to worst

>fourteen cushions//

How can she count those so quickly, particularly if they're covered?

>Or else, you’d have to go out there like that//

No reason for that comma.

>Moon Dancer breathed a sigh of relief //

These prepositional phrases of the form "in/with/of mood or emotion" are rarely necessary. There's almost always something else in the sentence to convey that mood or emotion, like the sigh here, making them redundant.

>Moon Dancer couldn’t help herself, she burst out laughing again//

Comma splice.

>after the she raised//

Extraneous word.

>Probably a good idea. In fact, I should probably//

Watch the close repetition.

I'll go ahead and type my intial impression, so it doesn't fade away too much to remember by the time I finishe the whole thing. As compared to your other story, it feels odd that this one is treading a lot of the same ground over again. We'll see if that remains the focus, but Sunset spend a good deal of it trying to make up with Twilight, and it felt like it was a recent phenomenon. Here, she's having the exact same kinds of feelings about other students, and when I hold the two up to each other, she doesn't seem to have made any progress between the stories. It's fine to cover that internal struggle of hers here, too, especially if you want this story to stand alone well, but I would still expect there to be something different in each to show it's an ongoing process.

>And…it//

You're mostly laving a space after an ellipsis, but you missed one here.

>paled visibly//

I'm not sure how you pale invisibly. Besides, Sunset's essentially the narrator, so if it wasn't visible, she couldn't have noticed it, so the point's moot anyway.

>in what could only be described as panic//

It already looks that way, so you're short-circuiting the visual to tell me this. You can add more to at visual if you want, but this is entirely unnecessary.

>lower teacher’s lounge//

I hadn't noticed where you'd put that apostrophe all the times you used this phrase before now, but this means there's only one teacher. Use the plural form. Same goes for "professor's lounge," unless you meant that was Apple Polish's personal lounge.

>After all, the school was for gifted unicorns after all./

After all, you say?

>thoughts of tea forgotten, at least temporarily//

Well, no, not by the narrative voice you have. For this limited a narrator, if she's forgotten it, so has the narrator. It's more likely she's deliberately pushing it aside in favor of dealing with this pony.

>T-that’s//

Think about what sound would actually be repeated in the stutter.

>Cheerilee blinked owlishly//

You descrived Twilight as doing so not too long ago, and it's an unusual enough word that it really stands out when repeated at all.

>months,” Cheerilee shrugged//

Poor choice of speaking verb. How do you shrug a sentence?

>off-guard//

You only need to hyphenate that if it modifies something that comes right after it, like "an off-guard moment."

>When you get put face-to-face//

Same deal.

>Another sip of tea.//

I don't know what it is about sharing tea, but authors suddenly lose all imagination when writing it. What do you do with your drink in this same situation? Yet so many writers just parrot some variation on "took another sip." Don't be one of them.

>Every colt and filly know the story.//

Typo.

>three smiling sunflowers//

They seem more like daisies. They're the wrong color for sunflowers.

>Being a unicorn was part of the core of her very being.//

Repetitive use of "being," even though they're used in different senses.

>Teaching for almost five decades probably makes a pony rather set in their ways. Sunset thought//

I haven't been keeping track of this, so you might have made the same mistake throughout the story. When you transition from a quote to an attribution, a period at the end of the quote gets changed to a comma.

>She only knocked on the door with a hoof.//

Well... what else would she use?

>to the room, all highlighted by the massive floor-to-ceiling windows that dominated the south side of the room//

Given that you already used a "the room" earlier in the sentence, that "of the room" could be changed to "of it" or eliminated entirely.

>A pencil floated in the air beside her and she scribbled something on a sheet of paper before putting it in the outbox.//

>she looked up and her normally hard eyes softened//
Needs a comma.

>I-It’s really nothing//

Unless it's something like a nme that has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first part of a stutter that starts a sentence.

>Why I had that voice in my head doesn’t matter, what matters was it was there.//

Comma splice.

>Philomena finally settled on Sunset’s back and nibbled at her ear affectionately.//

Look how incredibly repetitive the sentence structure in this paragraph is. All 4 sentences go "subject does this and that."

>They recommended I take you on as my aide and I wanted to see you in action for myself.//

Needs a comma.

>Those who you have helped//

whom

>wishing she could let go of another little voice in her head//

I don't remember if I said this in your previous submission, but I'll go off on a bit of side discussion here. There are two classes of verbs that you should use very sparingly in a narration this limited. The first is verbs related to perception, like see, hear, taste, smell, feel. The reason why is because this narrator essentially is Sunset and differs very little from a first-person narrator. They're irrevocably connected; what one senses, the other does as well. So you don't need to tell me Sunset sees something. Just by the fact of the narrator describing it, it's implicit that Sunset must have seen it, or the narrator couldn't have either and couldn't describe it. It's only worth saying she sees something if you want to add special emphasis, like it's an easily missed detail or she was specifically keeping watch for it.

The second class operates on a similar theory, and they're ones related to thought and knowledge, like think, know, wish, want, wonder, and hope. The narrator can simply express these things instead of acting as a middleman and relaying an assurance that Sunset did in fact wish it. Instead of telling me Sunset wished this, just have the narrator wish it for her. There are multiple ways of expressing any of these verbs in such a manner; for "wish," it's common to use an "if only..." phrasing.

>Because when she had rubbed the back of her mane, it had once again loosened the architecture holding the massive construction supporting her mane.//

Repetitive use of "her mane."

Now that I'm at the end, I'll reiterate that this story really has nothing to offer that wasn't already in "The Application of Unified Harmony Magics." It's essentially the same conflict, though actually more muted, and Sunset doesn't seem to have made any progress on her self-criticism by the time that story happens, even though both paint her as continually working on it. The conflict feels even more wedged in on this one, though, as Sunset encounters Cheerilee by chance, then takes it upon herself to muscle Cheerliee through an encounter that's incredibly convenient in how it ends up benefiting Cheerilee and how quickly and flawlessly Sunset manages to put it together. In short, it feels like a bunch of whirlwind events happened in a short time that got everyone exactly what they wanted without any of them actually having to work for it.

That said, the writing is good, the characters are fun, and it's up to the quality of your other story. You could get this one on EqD anyway by attaching it to the first as a side story/prequel, but a solo post is obviously more desirable, and I'd rather it go that way because of the writing quality alone.
This post was edited by its author on .

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2537

>>2535

Thank you kindly! I will take your feedback to heart for the upcoming chapters. Thanks for your patience with me, too.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2544

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>world renowned//
Needs a hyphen.

Story:
>for awhile//
"Awhile" and "a while" aren't the same thing, and an adverb wouldn't parse here. You really do need it to be two words. GDocs often lies about this.

>little. She was a little//

Watch the close repetition.

>tick tocking//

You mean the whole phrase to be a single adjective, and what it describes comes next, so hyphenate it.

>"WATCH WHERE YOU'RE GOING, LEADFLANK! GERARD GOLDENWINGS' NEW APPRENTICE COMING THROUGH!”//

The opening quotes and apostrophe here are a simple style, where most of the story uses the fancy style. Be consistent.

>half-flying and half-falling down through the sky//

You'll normally want to set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>another...and another...and//

It formats better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence. This won't be the only place you do this.

>“Sheesh, those ponies make Rainbow Dash look like a proper Canterlot gentlemare," she grumbled.//

Another spot where you mix quotation mark styles. You'll have to scan the story for these.

>No sooner than had she said it//

That word order doesn't quite parse. You were using some fancy but valid ones earlier, but this one doesn't work.

>sound of something being strewn out over the floor; this time, the paper sounded//

Watch that close repetition again.

>ever so distinctive//

Hyphenate.

>found inside a rainbow-colored whirlwind//

You have to be careful ordering words that can serve as either a preposition or an adverb. Here, it sounds like you mean something's inside the whirlwind.

>Quick Twilight//

Needs a comma, or else she's saying Twilight is fast.

>‘Bolts//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they think you want an opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. You should probably scan the story for these, too.

>plopped down into a lay//

I've never heard that phrasing before. If it's one you're familiar with, it's fine, but it sounds odd to me.

>Navigating a sea of flapping wings and flailing hooves in order to deliver his customer’s breakfast.//

Only capitalize after a colon if the colon refers to multiple sentences.

>just waiting to trip him and ducked just//

Watch the repetition again. This is a word that authors particularly tend to overuse.

>Monsieur//

This is just a generic term of address. There's no need to capitalize it.

>the pegasus ponies that filled the air//

Usually with sentient creatures, you'll use "who" instead of "that."

>around which the storm of wings and thunder of voices whirled furiously about//

The "around which" is supposed to avoid having a dangling preposition at the end, yet you have one anyway. They're redundant.

>You poked me in the eye you jerk!”//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>You- You know my-EEEEEEE!//

Hyphens are for stutters. Please use a proper dash.

>The sun shined//

This is the transitive past tense, like what you do to brass or shoes. You want "shone."

>they were devastated//

This is awfully blunt. Paint a picture, Let me see it so I can decide for myself.

>I’m devastated//

And then he repeats the word anyway. This'll be a moot point if you deal with the previous comment.

>mayhaps//

People often confuse this with "perhaps." It's actually "mayhap."

>quite a handsome creature I think you will find//

Without a comma, this literally means he thinks they'll find it.

>after awhile//

Another spot where you actually need "a while" to be two words.

>The pegasi began breaking into argument//

Seems like that's either be "arguments" or "an argument."

>over who would be the one to catch the sparrow.

>
>“I will catch the golden sparrow!”//
What's the point of that first part when the second says the same thing?

>see-//

>Unfortunately-//
Use a dash.

>The pegasi fell silent and all eyes turned towards him.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>to-” he paused//

Use a dash. And this is one of the most useless pieces of narration that authors love to use. It's meaningless that he paused. What's important is what happens during the pause, but you skip that. The pause was already apparent from how the quote was broken, so the only reason to put these two words here is because you couldn't think of anything interesting to say.

>Gerard pointed his talon and the pegasi followed it to see something shimmering brightly over nearby Sugarcube Corner.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>“Uh…tell you what, kid,” Applejack took a green apple and popped it into the colt’s mouth.//

You've punctuated /capitalizaed this as if the narration were a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>Sugarcube//

That's a generic term of endearment she uses to describe many ponies. It wouldn't be capitalized. Look for these, as you do it intermittently.

>Golden Harvest’s stall wasn’t the first thing Dash had crashed into today//

Keep in mind you seem to be using AJ as the perspective character here, but you're presenting this as a fact where she can't know it to be. If you used a "must not have been" or "surely wasn't" or some such, it more clearly gets across that AJ is drawing a conclusion instead of having definite knowledge.

>strange looking//

Hyphenate.

>so-//

Use a dash. I don't want to clutter up my response with a bunch of these, so just go scan for them.

>in outrage//

>in frustration//
These occur in the same paragraph. In general, you want me to figure these out through your description of how the characters look and act, not because the narrator directly tells me so.

>But hey, listen up: If you promise not to go pulling any more dangerous stunts like that, maybe I can give you a few tips.//

Don't need to capitalize after that colon, since it only refers to a single sentence.

>Dash gasped in excitement//

>in disgust//
Yeah, you really need to try to avoid these "in/with/of emotion" phrases.

>You know Applejack//

Needs a comma for direct address, or she's asking AJ if she knows herself.

>Dodge junction//

Both words are in the town name, so both should be capitalized.

>Applejack laid in wait//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tricky verbs to keep straight. You want "lay" here.

>“Hey, what’s that earth pony doing?” One of the pegasi called out.//

Speech tag capitalization.

>skid his legs across the earth//

Why'd you switch to present tense here?

>in Applejack’s accent//

That's already apparent. You don't need to say so.

>Applejack mocked//

You just had Dash use the same speaking verb a bit ago, and a "mockery" in between.

>ground her hoof into the ground//

Gotta be a less repetitive way to phrase that.

>in the direction the others had left in//

Redundant "in"s.

>“You’re sure you saw it fly in here, Cloudchaser? I don’t see it.”

>
>“I’m positive! It must be hiding.”//
Why are they cooperating?

>Magic surged through Twilight and sparks streamed from her horn as she shot up.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>defenestrating them out through both open windows//

That's rather redundant. At least you're giving context to a word the reader might not know, but repeating the exact meaning is pretty blunt.

>Twilight, I heard shouting!”//

Missing your opening quotes.

>a moment of silence passed as he took in the newly disheveled library.//

Capitlization.

>It’s okay, Spike,”//

>Sheesh, what’s got his tail tied in a knot?”//
Missing your opening quotes again.

>purple tinted//

Hyphenate.

>iron.“ Uh//

You got the space and the quotation marks out of order.

>Twilight peaked over the top//

Peek/peak confusion.

>Passer euchlorus//

I thought you said it was a golden sparrow? So why does its species name refer to green?

>I guess that’s cool and all Twi,//

See, when direct address takes place in the middle of a sentence, it takes commas on both sides. At an end of the sentence, only on one side.

>Saddle Arabian Zoology.”//

Unless the base font for the quote is italics, leave the quotation marks in normal font. Here, they don't match the opening ones.

>Passer Euchlorus//

You're inconsistent at how you captalize this.

>Well guess what Twilight,//

Another thing I'm going to have to leave you to scan for, or it'll take me forever to get through this. Watch that direct address.

>I’ll already have everything I want when Gerard Goldenwings is teaching me.//

It hasn't occurred to her that she might need to use the wish to get this? Maybe not, but... well, Twilight's smart enough to figure it out, but maybe too socially inept to see what Gerard's doing. I bet if you get all three girls together, they might get it.

>full grown//

Hyphenate.

>for awhile//

for a while

>box seed//

Seems like you're missing a word. This just sounds odd.

>pulling up her binoculars and trained them on the bowl of seed//

Mismatched verb forms, unless you wanted to end the participle at "binoculars," in which case you need a comma there.

>The two ponies laid in ambush//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>began to crawl. She began//

Repetitive, but in the bigger picture, you tend to use a fair amount of these start/begin actions, and you really don't need them. It's obvious that any given action will begin. You don't need to say so. It's only worth pointing out when the beginning is noteworthy for some reason, like it's abrupt or the action never finishes.

>her proclamation was cut short when a magic aura wrapped around her muzzle and forced her jaw shut//

Capitalization.

>WOOOOOAH//

I do not exaggerate when I say at least 3/4 of the authors I get don't know how to spell this. Please don't be one of them.

>the two disoriented mares//

I was giving you some leeway on these types of descriptions, but this one is just too much. You're telling this scene with Dash as your perspective character, so she's including herself here. That's just weird. If you and a friend are doing something, do you mentally refer to the pair of you as "the two buddies"? The other thing is that if she's truly disoriented, she probably wouldn't have the presence of mind to describe herself as such. Rather, her narration, which is essentially her internal voice, would sound like it was having trouble getting sorted out.

>soon caused Twilight’s elaborate system of ropes and gears to come crashing down atop and around them. Soon//

Watch that repetition.

>now vacant//

Hyphenate.

>?!?//

One of each is plenty.

>swathes//

That's the verb form. The noun is "swaths."

>sweat stang//

stung

>The boulder raced towards the earth and sunk deeply into the water//

This sounds nonsensical. It's headed for the ground but hits the water?

>“I mean, well, yes, not me personally, but…” she gulped.//

Another non-speaking action used as an attribution.

>who cowered between the two parties//

Set off this dependent clause with a comma.

>Do-do you need help understanding what-//

The first one is a stutter which can go either way, depending on how you want it inflected, but the cutoff does need to be a dash.

>Fluttershy backed away and her lip began to quiver.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Just thinking about the golden twit//

So this pretty definitively shos you're using Dash as your perspective character for the scene, yet you used another of those odd descriptors for her early in the scene: "the snorting pony." Why would she describe herself with a phrase like that? It's very external.

>Harry was watching droplets run down the empty recess of his spilled teacup. He looked over at Rainbow Dash with his face contorted into a grisly sneer and rumbled to his feet. He walked over, grabbed the tie-dye tail sprouting out of the wall, and plucked Dash from the window as easily as if she were a turnip from the soil.//

Hang on. You've been telling teh scene from Dash's perspective. How can she see this to describe it. With a limited narrator like this, the narrator can't see what she doesn't.

>tealeaves//

Two words.

>a twinge of regret//

Don't draw the conclusion for me. Let me see how it looks.

>Joy exploded like fireworks within Rainbow Dash.//

This loses a lot of power when you just tell me. Demonstrate it. Make Dash act joyful. Make her narration sound joyful.

>making suppressive gestures//

That's very vague. Show me what she does.

>café//

You've been inconsistent through the whole story about whether you put that accent mark there.

>honest: This I did not expect.//

Capitalization.

>Where is she might I ask?//

Needs a comma.

>She had been halfway through making up her mind to steal Ferris back and hold him ransom until the flight master anteed up and taught her some of his repetoire.//

Careful. You started the scene in Gerard's perspective, but this would require him to read her mind.

>the sounds of their humor made for a good clean harmony//

This is really oddly phrased.

>Tank blinked.//

This is a really underwhelming finale. Honestly, if you ended the story on "laugh," it would be much better.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2549

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>usually. Besides the usual//

Try to avoid close repetition like that, unless it's for a deliberate effect.

>fresh-cut flowers feels foreign//

All that alliteration tends to create a playful feel, and I'm not sure that's the tone you want. You even have 4 more words beginning in "f" in the rest of the same sentence.

>in my hand//

Oh, I guess you do have the human tag. That cover art is really misleading.

>nicely-pressed//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word descriptors starting in an -ly adverb.

>She doesn’t even know what you’ve got planned//

Who's this "you"? If this is a direct thought, then put it in italics.

>Brain, we’ve been over this.//

Okay, it's kind of a dialogue, but narration is more for indirect impressions. If you want her to be literally thinking this stuff, put it in italics. A "you" in plain narration is going to address the reader, not the character.

>I resist the urge to tell it to go one and tell me all about it.//

I have no idea what this is saying. It's also a bit repetitive.

>with a few stray whips peaking out//

Peak/peek confusion.

>Her hair is up in its usual pink bun, with a few stray whips peaking out from under her hat due to the day’s exertions. Her posture is focused, but more relaxed than she sometimes is right after work, and I doubt she’s even realized that her shift is about to end at this point. Her tail is also bound up, but one long lock of coral pink cascades down against the back of one leg, looking out of place but also kind of adorable. I spend just a moment watching her work, amused and kind of happy at catching her unawares.//

Actually, let me revisit this whole paragraph. Look at how awash in "to be" verbs it is. It ends fine, but the first half of it has 6 of these verbs. They're inherently boring, since nothing happens, and they can tend to drag a story's action and momentum. It's impractical to avoid them altogether, but it'd benefit you to try phrasing things in an active manner when you can.

>I can see in her expression a wave of shock, confusion, and just maybe a little joy//

What does he see that makes him identify it as such? Describe those things to me and let me draw my own conclusions. It's more engaging that way.

>What…what in Equestria are you doing?//

It frmats better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence. Also, they're human. What are they doing in Equestria?

>my-//

Please use a proper dash. Hyphens are for stutters.

>covering her face with both hooves//

Oh. It's one of those. Human guy, pony gal. Got it.

>“Whatever you say lady Red!” I say//

"Lady" is essentially being used as a title here, so it would be capitalized. And you're missing a comma for direct address. And a repetitive use of "say."

>Just call me Red like I’ve asked, I’m a nurse right now, I hardly feel ladylike.//

There are times comma splices can work, but I'm not feeling it here.

>The waiter escorts us to a small table near the back of the restaurant, away from most of the other guests.//

And the story is stagnating again with all these "to be" verbs. The first two paragraphs of this scene contain a total of nine.

>the waiter pulls back Red's chair so she can sit down and she gives him one of her more charming smiles as she settles in//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>"This is way, way too much,"//

Until now, you had the fancy-style quotation marks, but it switches to the simple ones at this scene. Be consistent.

>I pretend to roll my eyes at her.//

How do you pretend that? Maybe there's not the intent behind it, but he must still do it. I mean, I don't get how you can create the impression of rolling your eyes without actually doing it.

>neither the time or place//

nor

>always-//

Use a dash.

>in half real shock, half faked shock//

This is far too blunt. Don't tell me how he feels. Demonstrate it. How would his internal musing, essentially what the narration is, reflect such a mood?

>I wrinkle my nose in exaggerated disgust. She gives a heavy, exasperated sigh.//

See how oftern you just identify character emotions? There are other times you get it right, where you just stick to what their facial expression, body language, etc. are and don't draw any conclusions from it.

>and I reach back, underneath//

I guess this means his hand is under her hoof? Because it kind of saound like he's going under the table.

>like, and more than that, I know that she sometimes has expensive tastes, even though she doesn't like//

Watch that close repetition.

>looking thrilled and a little embarrassed//

See, why this is ineffective is it doesn't create a visual. There are many ways to look thrilled and embarrassed. What's your vision of it? What do you want me to see? Experiencing it is engaging, but when I don't get to, it's just a cold fact. I can either make up my own picture of how she's acting, which is really your job, or I can move on with the information but not really having a reason to care about it.

>...//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing. It's irrelevat that there's a pause here. What gives it meaning is what happens during the pause, how the characters act.

>The thing is sealed tight and it doesn't seem to want to go anywhere.//

Needs a comma.

>in annoyance//

In general, I'm only pointing out the first couple instances of each kind of problem I see and leaving the rest for you to find. But you really need to clamp down on this kind of phrasing. These "in/of/with emotion" phrases are almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence, and even if they aren't, they're still forcing a conclusion on the reader instead of getting him to interpret the behavioral clues like he would with a real person. You don't want to tell the reader what to think. If it helps, there's a brief discussion of "show versus tell" at the top of this thread.

>"I'm so sorry," I mutter between my palms. "that was stupid of me."//

Either the punctuation or the capitalization is off.

>straightens and sets her lips in a straight//

Kind of repetitive.

>just call the date now we can just//

And that's a word many authors tend to overuse. You have 42 in the story, which is relatively high for this word count.

>"I. Am so. Sorry." I say brokenly.//

Punctuation.

>ok//

It's preferred to spell it out as "okay."

>mock- bow//

You don't need the hyphen, but even if you want it, don't leave a space after it.

>Why thank you sir//

>Not at all my dear//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>same, gentlemanly//

These are hierarchical adjectives, so they don't take a comma between them. It's not a foolproof test, but if you reverse the order and it sounds absurd, you probably don't need a comma.

>As if to shut me up, I hear the soft cough of the waiter at my side//

Since "I" is the subject of the main clause, that's what the "as if to shut me up" describes, but it's the waiter doing it.

>I swallow my desire to scream at this whole situation, and nod understandingly.//

You don't need a comma here, since it's all the same clause.

>for too long, and I can feel her putting a lot of weight against my hip as we move, so I won't force her to do this for too long//

Repeated phrasing.

>as I let go of her and very nearly crash into her as I fall past onto the sidewalk below//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in a sentence like that, and it can make the chronology a lot more complicated than it needs to be, since it's trying to synchronize a bunch of actions.

Now that I'm near the end, I can say there was a lot up front in the story that never paid off. I still don't know whay everyone found his outfit funny, and they all seemed familiar with him, too, so it 's implied there's quite a bit of back story, but we nver get a glimpse of any of it.

>dissapointed//

Spelling.

This was a cute moment with lots of nice character interaction. I can't help feeling like it doesn't sell the romance, though. Mostly because I know next to nothing about this human guy. He's clumsy and lacks self-confidence. That's the sum total. Part of making a romance work is by proving the two have a real investment in each other, that there are things each one gives and takes from a relationship, and in fairly equal measure. If I don't know anything about him, then I don't know what endears him to Redheart. If you go looking through Aragon's blog posts, you'll find one where he discusses this dynamic of making sure a relationship is balanced, which is a big chunk of making it believable and authentic. It's a little better in the other direction, where he notes more details he likes about her. For instance, the way she tries to walk upright with him. A lot of these kinds of things work by anecdote though, where someone will notice a detail about someone, and it dredges up a memory of another time they noticed the same thing, or that it was important. These things do double duty, too, since that help fill in some back story as to why they love each other.

That's really the big thing. You have to convince the reader these characters are actually in love. You do show his devotion to Redheart a lot, but it's on the vague side, and since his personality is so undefined, it's unclear what Redheart sees in him. It's a nice comedy of errors, but the impetus behind a lot of that is predicated on the romantic interest. If you want to flesh that out some more, you could have a cute, compelling romance story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2558

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Back when I had friends, family, and those I loved and cared about.//

So you mean she didn't have friends, family, or folks she loved and cared about after she became an alicorn? Because the show very explicitly contradicts this, and you're not calling it AU.

>They are all gone now; my friends, my apprentice, Spike, my brother, Cadance, Flurry Heart, even Celestia and Luna.//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to replace it with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence. A dash or colon would do fine.

Let's revisit the first few paragraphs. To grab a reader's interest, it's far more beneficial to keep things active at the beginning of the story. One thing that works against that is the use of too many "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring, as nothing happens. It's impractical to remove them from a story altogether, but for the most part, it's good to limit them as much as possible. You have 11 of them in the first two paragraphs alone, which makes the story feel stagnant right from the start. But then you go through the next 3 paragraphs without a single one, only 2 in the next paragraph, and one in the next. So you eventually do a better job of casting things in active verbs, but the first two paragraphs could use a retool.

>I am the only one left and, most likely, I will be the last.//

What's her basis for saying this? It's been shown that alicorns can be born or ascended, and it's never mentioned that existing alicorns are any sort of requirement for others being able to ascend. So what does she think would prevent it from ever happening again?

>I heard a voice call out to me and I turned around.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. I suspect I'll find a lot of these.

>as a little filly, no older than six, entered my room with a hop and skip as her blue and lavender mane bounced up and down//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, particularly if they're attached to the same independent clause. Not to mention they tend to confuse a sentence's chronology, since they're both telling me all this stuff happens at the same time. And why do you describe her as "no older than six"? Twilight should know exactly how old she is.

>six year-old//

Hyphenate all that.

>Deciding to humor her//

It's not usually a good idea to so bluntly spell out a character's motivation like this.

>chalkboard, and other sort of things that I simply chalked//

Watch the repetitive wording.

>Woah//

Why can't anyone spell this right? I'm not exaggerating when I say that at least 75% of stories I see have it wrong. Do a Ctrl-f, as there are more than one.

You don't need to do these flashback scenes in italics. It's obvious what they are anyway, and it just gets irritating to read that much italicized text. It's supposed to make things stand out, but when this much stands out, nothing does.

>I asked with joy//

A couple things. First, this is very repetitive with her already describing herself as "overjoyed" in the previous sentence. Second, both of those are very blunt evaluations of her emotion. Think of how an actor would get you to believe his character was joyful. He wouldn't directly speak to the audience and say he was. Yet that's what your narrator is doing. Instead, the actor makes sure he puts details into his appearance and behavior that the audience will interpret as joy. The same works best for written characters. The ways authors are typically so blunt like this are by using emotion and mood words as nouns (his sadness), adjectives (the happy filly), adverbs (she walked excitedly), and prepositional phrases (sighed in relief).

>I showed all my friends my doll and they all loved her too.//

>Even when I went to sleep I still held on to her.//
Needs a comma.

>Miss. Smartypants//

Extraneous period.

>All my friends had gone to Summer Camps this year and I was left alone.//

Needs a comma. And why is "Summer Camps" capitalized?

>I laughed with joy//

You're doing that thing again.

>I wondered if she knew something was wrong.//

This is kind of an advanced topic, but it's worth sweeping your story for. A limited narrator, be it first or third person, gives you a unique opportunity to have the narrator express emotion on the character's behalf or show the character's perception. This usually happens through certain verbs. I'll split them by those categories and explain why.

For perception verbs, the narrator and character are the same person, so they necessarily have the same perception. If the narrator sees something, the character does as well. And if the character can't see something, the narrator can't describe it. So it's enough for the narrator to mention or describe how anything looks. It's implied that's the character's experience of it as well. So it's rare that the narrator will ever have to use perception verbs like see, hear, and smell. The only time it's worth using them in this limited a narration is when you want to emphasize the detail is easy to miss or that the character was specifically searching for it.

For knowledge verbs, it's similar. The narrator knows and feels the same things as the character. So since the narrator is already expressing things on the character's behalf, you're skipping an opportunity to do so by using these verbs. They're things like wish, want, hope, wonder, know, and think. So in this case, you're forcing an extra distance between the character and reader that doesn't need to be there. Instead of having the narrator relay that Twilight wonders this, just have the narrator wonder it for her: "Did she know something was wrong?"

>“Well, you always have to do it every day to get used to it!” I said with a smile. “Plus it helps having a good friend to help you!”//

Exclamation marks are like italics. They make things stand out, and if everything stands out, nothing does. You have exclamation marks on so much of the dialogue in this scene. Question marks are fine, as they're required by circumstance, but of the other quoted sentences, you have nine exclamation marks in a row before we get to the first period.

>causing her to laugh at the feeling of his claws//

You'll normally set off a participle with a comma.

>Spike growled and jumped towards me but I stabbed him with the fake sword causing him to back up and grip his chest.//

Needs 2 commas.

>pretending to be dead.//

Over-explaining character motives again. It's already apparent that's what he's doing, but you can add some imagery if you like.

>by the way//

Set this off with a comma.

>The Legend of Mare In The Moon//

Book titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized. But since your base font here is already italics (see previous note about all the flashbacks being italicized), that reverses book titles back to normal font.

>thanks to my alicorn metabolism//

Set this off with a comma.

>one hundred and fifty//

Twilight's usually fastidious about technical matters. I think she'd know it was improper to put an "and" in a number like that.

>feelings that I felt//

Repetitive.

>Even though the evil side of Luna was gone, dead, or banished I still felt terrified just thinking about her.//

Needs a comma.

>Yet, that wasn’t what was truly scaring me.//

There's rarely a good reason to put a comma after a conjunction. This one doesn't belong.

>sleeping a living//

Typo.

>Princess Celestia had gotten some guards to bring my stuff from the tower and she was inside one of them.//

Needs a comma, and the "she" sure sounds like it's referring to Celestia.

>Smartypants was inside//

You already said that (ambiguous pronoun aside). Needs a comma after this, too.

>she said but I quickly put my hoof to her lips.//

Needs a comma.

>she looked around in awe//

See, when you directly identify the mood like that, you don't paint a picture. You make me invent it or just move on with it as nothing more than a cold fact. It's your job to show me how this looks in a way that I'll conclude awe from it.

>It’s not to far//

To/too confusion.

>different colored//

Hyphenate.

>looked at me with excitement//

Let me see what it looks like.

>... Princess//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis. There are other spots of this I see.

>S-she//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. Not just the "s," right?

>I didn’t need to voice an answer because my tears were already speaking for me.//

Needs a comma.

>I had long steeled my heart to prevent any pain from the fact that those I loved were gone.//

To be blunt, this is one of the big obstacles this story faces. This plot of "Twilight's sad because she outlived her friends" is so worn out that you really have to do something different with it. The Smarty Pants angle is a bit different, but she's essentially just another friend she's sad to leave. And really, after so many centuries, she's never made any other close friends? The Princess of Friendship? That's another conceit these types of stories often have that's hard to swallow. Yes, they were among her first good friends, but she's had plenty of time to come to terms with their deaths, especially considering how much else from that same era that's gone from her memory, plus she's never fostered anything else comparable?

>who held my old Smartypants doll in her mouth//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>Thanks for letting me borrow, Smartypants//

Why on the world is that comma there?

>My daughter should be getting her own stuffed animal back tomorrow, good as new.//

You forgot to close your quotation marks.

>curious as to how the play date went//

Over-explaining her mood again, and it's obvious anyway from how the conversation goes.

>as the nostalgic years filled my head//

This is very vague. Any sort of specific example will carry far more power.

>I looked down at my friend... my first best friend, who looked at me with such an innocent yet confused expression.//

Repetition of "looked," plus very blunt emotional depiction again.

>I can’t remember when I felt... sad.//

This comes soon after her lamenting that she'd long ago lost the best friends she ever had, and that Spike should have outlived her immensely. Either she felt sad for those or she didn't. You can't have it both ways.

>I screamed apology after apology.//

This is really over the top. The more maudlin you get, the less authentic it feels. People rarely just lose control like this, and when they do, there's some sort of build-up as to why it's reasonable, but she goes zero to sixty in no time. Where emotion is concerned, less is often more.

>My magic reacted to my emotions and soon enough everything in my entire room exploded into a mess. The guards tried to enter my room but I shouted them to leave me alone. They must have been scared because they didn’t bother me the rest of the evening.//

All of these sentences need a comma.

>world into a united world//

Repetition.

>that was now expanding the stars themselves//

I assume you mean "to" the stars. Because I don't see the point of making stars bigger.

>For a long time//

And through all this long time, Smartypants is just sitting there doing nothing?

>Everything seemed to just get so busy//

"Just" is a word many authors tend to overuse. You have it 5 times in this paragraph alone. And there are 37 in the story, which is getting up there for this word count.

>2 + 2//

You wrote it out as words before, which is preferred.

>F-F-Four//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, like a proper noun.

>I shouted with joy.//

Blunt with the emotions again. But it's a little bit different when the narrator's talking about herself. There are some signs of emotion that you wouldn't know about, like your cheeks turning red, since you can't see them. You might deduce it from them feeling warm—you have to consider what's reasonable for the person to perceive. So there are some things you can do here to make her look joyful. She'd be self-aware of jumping or smiling, for instance, but this kind of narrator might also mention a mental image or a physical sensation it causes.

>fatigue set in and I held my favorite doll and oldest friend against my chest//

Needs a comma.

>they were not of sorrow or guilt like before. They were of joy.//

Blunt emotional context again.

>(who left Equestria forever after Fluttershy died)//

Feels really odd not to mention this until now, like it was an afterthought and you needed to wedge it in somewhere.

>A single spell later and everything was cleaned up; as if last night’s emotional outburst never happened.//

Another misused semicolon.

>The spell having ended when I fell asleep.//

Absolute phrases make poor sentence fragments, since they sound like they're trying to be complete sentences.

>A blush decorated my cheeks//

Well, it looks prescient that I already talked about blushes. She can't see this, so talk about it in terms she would perceive.

>Great “insert the amount of times” Granddaughter//

Why is that capitalized?

>“Great, but...” she gave a rejected sigh.//

You've made that lower-case as if it's a speech tag, but you have no speaking action.

>You can teach her a few things and I’m sure she can teach you a few things in return//

Needs a comma.

>shouted Smartypants with joy//

You know the drill by now.

I have to applaud you for the ending. After that maudlin display of Twilight crying, I expected you'd have her die right after Starwish left.

So it should be clear what the main problems are. Most times you try to portray character emotion, you resort to just telling me how the characters feel, and that isn't a particularly engaging method. It's an important hurdle writers need to learn to overcome, and I've noticed it in your writing before. No time like the present to conquer it.

A couple of plot elements didn't quite make sense, either, but I've already explained those. Really, if you can get a handle on having characters demonstrate emotion more than just having the narrator tell me how they feel, that's the only big thing you'd need to do that'd improve the story significantly.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2564

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>nearly sixteen and preparing to strike out on her own, their parents were nearly//

Watch repeating all but the most mundane of words in close quarters like this.

>building, what they called, the perfect place to find a cutie mark//

No reason to have any of those commas.

>finished.

>
>With the dishes finished//
More close repetition.

>she walked up the stairs to Sweetie Bell’s room, gently knocking on the door

Do a Ctrl-f on "Sweetie Bell" and make sure you've spelled it right throughout. Also note that participles mean things happen at the same time, yet she wouldn't knock on the door until after she'd walked up the stairs. I bet this will be a pervasive problem.

>full length//

Hyphenate.

>Sweetie looked at Rarity through the mirror//

How do you see through a mirror?

>Rarity smiled back, walking over to Sweetie, and looking in the mirror with her.//

And you're falling into the trap of repeating some of these words. "Smile" and "look" are ones inexperienced authors tend to overuse. You have a "look" 4 paragraphs in a row around here and 16 in the chapter. They tend to occur in clusters. At the very least, spreading them out more would help, but you really ought to use more variety in your word choice anyway.

>She started when she felt Rarity nuzzling her.//

Be careful with your perspective. You still seem to be using a pretty omniscient narrator, but you're primarily sticking to Rarity's experiences. She couldn't know for sure that Sweetie Belle felt her nuzzling here, so it seems to go over to Sweetie Belle in a shallow perspective, yet you go right back to Rarity afterward. Consistency helps. If you want to jump around quickly, then keep that motion going. If you want to settle into one character for a while, then stay with Sweetie Belle longer than a single sentence.

>She needed to be awake in the morning to complete the orders from her shop in Appleloosa.//

A word about "to be" verbs: You're not using a ton of them, but you're also not taking many opportunities to avoid them. They're inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens, so it gives your story more momentum when you can phrase things with active verbs. Take this excerpt. If you'd said, "She needed to wake early enough to complete the orders from her shop in Appleloosa," it doesn't lose anything, and it's more active.

>Taking the kettle, she walked over to the sink, filling it with water//

Yeah, this will be a pervasive problem. I can't spend hours pulling out every instance, so you'll have to sweep for these on your own. These three actions would occur in sequence, but the participles mean they all happen at once.

>needed boxing up, but the vests all needed//

More repetition. I haven't been pulling out every spot I find.

>tea cup//

Teacup. You have this more than once.

>Grasping the blankets in her light colored magic, she slipped under. She sat up moments later, realizing she hadn’t brushed her teeth after that cup of tea.//

Okay, now a word about participial phrases. They're something authors of intermediate experience tend to lean on because they're descriptive and a more advanced sentence structure, but they're also unusual in everyday use, so they stand out easily when overused. Actually, I should have grabbed the entire paragraph, since that's what I'm commenting on. You have 6 sentences, and 5 of them have a participial phrase. It gets in a rut. You don't even vary the location in the sentence. They're all simple sentences, just an independent clause with the participle attached, which limits the places you can put a participle. Still, there are ways to wedge them in other places, but you always either begin or end the sentence with it.

>she slipped under//

>She had just slipped her house shoes on//
These are only 2 sentences apart.

>her sisters mane//

Missing apostrophe.

>old times sake//

old times' sake

>W-What//

Onl capitalize the first part of a stutter unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>troubling you. “Your stomach trouble//

More repetition.

>like the mares dress had been//

Missing apostrophe.

>and their adjustments were easy//

The first two were okay, but to have a third instance of this word in just the first two paragraphs of the chapter? That's a bit much. Surely you can find a synonym.

>but Rarity had done her best to adjust his vest//

And another use of a related word. That's now 4 in 2 paragraphs. Minor point, but also note that the unintentional rhyme tends to create a playful mood.

>much too small//

As you've used it, hyphenate this.

>but it was too small//

You already said so in the previous paragraph.

>You made exactly what we asked you too.//

While that is a possibly valid sentence, I can't help thinking you meant "to" instead of "too."

>so…muscly//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts the sentence. Check through the story for these.

>as a flash of magenta appeared between the two, a scroll falling to the ground as their eyes focused.//

It can be very clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, not only because of the repetition, but because they have the same synchronization issues participles do.

>Hmm, not even Dear Rarity?//

Wouldn't she put the quoted part in quotes? It'd use single quotes, since it's already inside another quotation.

>I know you’re on an important business trip to Appleloosa but you have to come back to Ponyville.//

Needs a comma.

I know you're doing it for dramatic tension, but I can't think of a realistic reason why Twilight wouldn't tell Rarity what's wrong with Sweetie Belle. If she could, surely she would. She's presented no justification for withholding it, or that Sweetie Belle asked her not to say, or that the doctor refused to tell anyone who wasn't family. There's a trick in making the suspended tension jive with an authentic reason for it.

>a concerned look//

Let me see it.

>“What about close to Ponyville?//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

>She was no better than their parents, running off and leaving the poor filly.//

Okay, this is opening up a can of worms. Your narration has been decidedly omniscient until now. Here, you're not stating something factual. You're having the narrator express Rarity's opinions and impressions on her behalf. That kind of thing really should be consistent throughout the story, but it also calls into question whether you need to have so much of Rarity's internal thoughts italicized as dialogue. That works for an omniscient narrator, but not really for a limited one. Given that this is the exception, it's probably better to tone this back into an omniscient feel, but I'll see how you handle the rest of the story.

>should have ran//

should have run

>‘bout//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they think you want a single opening quotation mark. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. Scan the story for these, too.

>six pointed//

Hyphenate.

>Rarity was on the back of the chariot and the guards took off//

Needs a comma.

>She sat, the adrenaline from her earlier panic starting to wear off.//

Make this a more concrete image. How does this leave her feeling?

>It-It’s//

Capitalization.

>light headed//

lightheaded

>double time//

Hyphenate.

>The unnatural whiteness of everything, the artificial smell of the air, the long hallways with strange medical instruments.//

Sentence fragments also create the feel of a limited narrator, since they're informal.

>She made it to the front desk and the welcome stallion looked up at her.//

Needs a comma.

>throwing one last thank you//

>With a quick “thank you,”//
Be consistent in how you format these.

>With a quick “thank you,” she took off at a quick trot.//

And I'll revisit that one. Close repetition of "quick."

>A small basket of apples sat on the table next to Sweetie Belle’s bed. Balloons were tied to the railings. Flowers and books were placed on the window seal.//

Compare the first sentence to the other two. It has an active structure, while the other two use passive voice. See how much more interesting the first is to read? And it's "windowsill."

>the sleeping girls mane//

I don't know why you keep missing these apostrophes in possessives. You do know how to use them, right?

>she had ate//

she had eaten

I'll jump in here to say you are actually doing a nice job of characterization, and there have been multiple instances where I started typing out what I thought to be a plot hole, only to find you'd already thought of it. Like why Twilight wouldn't know the train schedule and just arrange for Rarity's transportation, or why Twilight would even suggest Rarity leave the hospital to get some sleep when Twilight herself has been sleeping perfectly well by the bedside. So kudos to you on that.

>Her blue eyes//

This'll depend on whether you want a limited narrator or not. If it's limited, you're effectively having Rarity note her own eye color, which is weird.

>her sisters green//

Yeah, why do you keep missing the apostrophes on these possessives? You get it right with names. It's kind of baffling.

>the girl’s terrified expression//

Let me see it too. It's far more powerful for the reader to witness it than to have to accept the narrator's assurances that she's terrified.

>fearing the answer//

Show this through her behavior. It'll carry much more weight.

>“I…” She trailed off//

The ellipsis already means she trailed off. You don't need to repeat it in the narration. It's not the only time you do this.

>I haven’t ate anything//

eaten

>her sisters eyes//

Missing apostrophe.

>Bulimia//

That doesn't need to be capitalized.

>to see at therapist//

Typo.

>Why did you…” she swallowed//

That's not a speaking action.

>Maybe mom and dad would notice//

When you use them in place of names, family relations get capitalized. So "there's Mom," but "there's my mom."

>their souls calling//

Missing apostrophe. I know I said I wouldn't keep marking the same things, but I have my doubts as to whether you'd find all these.

>Sweetie threw herself onto Rarity, burying her face in Rarity’s neck. Sobs shook her as Rarity held tightly to her, stroking her back.//

Okay, this is really over the top. If you get really maudlin, you make the story more ridiculous and less relatable. Real people try to control themselves more, and if you do too much, it feels inauthentic. Less is often more.

>as they sat on the kitchen floor//

Wait, they're home now? You should establish that right at the beginning of the scene. Redheart had mentioned the possibility of releasing her, but not when. Until now, I took this as still being in the hospital.

>Rarity added as much affection as she could to her words as she softly spoke.//

This is a bit awkwardly phrased, but it feels rather stiff for the kind of sentiment it's trying to express.

>“I’m terribl—“//

Note how dashes can break smart quotes. It's turned these backward. And a bunch more of them, I see, in other chapters as well.

>Oh, mother, father.//

Capitalize.

>at her convince//

I'm pretty sure you meant "convenience."

>Pinkie’s ‘Let’s Eat’ party//

This is really cute. Sounds like she's at least beginning to acknowledge her problem, but it makes me wonder when you'll say how therapy is going, or if she's even been yet.

>one month mark//

one-month mark

>Rarity and Sweetie Belle were in the kitchen preparing lunch when another knock came to the door.//

They were just in Rarity's room. This really needs a scene break.

>Would you like to come in, Sweetie Belle and I were just making lunch.//

Comma splice, and that first part needs a question mark.

>Well, I believe your therapist said to figure out your emotional state, correct? Are you upset about anything?//

So you're addressing the therapy now. I don't have a sense of how long this has been. As far as I can tell, it's the next day after Rarity scolded her parents, so 5 days after Sweetie Belle went to the hospital. It's a little quick to have been to the therapist. to say nothing of multiple visits. Yet while Sweetie Belle was initially resistant to the idea of therapy, which is fine, she's showing a very dramatic change in attitude already, and that's not quite as believable.

>she?//

When you have a question mark or exclamation mark on a word italicized for emphasis, include it in the italics.

Okay, so we have shipping out of nowhere here. I really hope it doesn't end up being extraneous to the story.

>While Sweetie was getting a shower, Rarity was cleaning up.//

Another couple of "to be" verbs that'd be easy to avoid. It's rarely necessary to use present participle tense.

>she was doing, but she was doing//

Repetition.

>‘clean’, as she put it.//

Odd for Rarity to attribute the terminology to Sweetie Belle, since Rarity used it herself earlier in the same paragraph.

>The bathroom door, by Sweetie Belle’s own decision, was to be open anytime she was in there alone.//

You already talked about this and moved on to something else, so it's strange to com back to it and say mostly the same thing.

>she heard Sweetie step out of the tub//

You already had a "she heard" phrasing in the previous paragraph. Why's it necessary to keep pointing out she heard stuff anyway? Just say it happened.

>Rarity sighed at the water droplets on the floor, finding the mop and drying them up before she finished cleaning and went to prepare herself for bed.//

That's an awful lot happening. But you say she's going up to get ready for bed, then in the next paragraph... that's not what she does.

>sisters hard-won one month//

sister's hard-won one-month

>trying to sooth her//

soothe

Nice to see this relapse. It helps combat the feeling that Sweetie Belle's recovery was too sudden and perfect. I still think her attitude changed awfully quickly, but this tempers the progression of events.

>What if Sweetie started again, but got better at hiding it? What if Rarity herself was a weak link that would drag Sweetie down again?//

Another spot where the narration takes on more of a limited feel, whereas most of the story is told as omniscient.

>Hydroflame//

Who's this? You haven't mentioned any such character before, so I have no context as to what significance this has. You're falling back on the "to be" verbs again, too. There are 7 in this paragraph.

>Oh, father, please//

Capitalization.

>“Yep. “//

Extraneous space, and it's made your quotation marks backward.

>The relaxed atmosphere the gentle teasing had created vanished almost instantly.//

Get at this through how the characters behave, not by telling me directly.

>She looked at her parents.//

Pretty repetitive with her looking at Sweetie Belle in the previous paragraph.

>The same two ponies who had cared for her and loved her as she was growing. The same two faces that always lit up with pride when she talked of nearly anything she had accomplished. The same two faces that she loved and wanted to please.//

This also has more of the feel of a limited narrator.

>was-I//

Use a proper dash. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread. For that matter, you should probably read the bit on "show versus tell" too.

>“We—“ Cookie started, but Rarity cut her off.//

Broken smart quotes. And like an ellipsis with trailing off, a dash already indicates an interruption. You don't need to have the narration repeat the effect.

>her parents eyes//

Missing apostrophe.

>Cookie looked between Rarity and Sweetie Belle.//

You're using "look" a lot again in this chapter. There are 18.

>I’m trying to work through that.//

Repetitive phrasing with what Cookie just said.

>the hurt her words caused apparent in their eyes//

Let me see it, too.

>site seeing//

sightseeing

>Sweetie munched on a cookie.//

Why's she so calm and unaffected?

>I’m going to go out, okay?//

She's key to this, and she wanted it to happen? Why's she bailing out? Why does Rarity let her?

>sipping on their drinks and watching the exchange with unhidden interest//

Set off this compound participle with a comma.

>still smiling. “I’m still//

Repetition.

>Thundy is helping Pound with his flying and the Cakes are still looking for a unicorn who can help Pumpkin with her magic.//

Needs a comma.

>guilt tripping//

Hyphenate.

>Applejack and Pinkie were tending to the buffet table. Rainbow Dash was inside giving tours, while Fluttershy was in the back doing the same.//

Lots of "to be" verbs again that would be easy to rephrase as active.

>Little Wing//

Another name you toss in there like I'm supposed to know who it is.

>crowd again. Her parents were mingling with the other ponies in the crowd//

Repetitive. And these are already the third and fourth times you use some form of "crowd" in the chapter. Then you have a fifth and sixth in the next paragraph.

>their daughters business//

Missing apostrophe.

>business mares//

Wouldn't that be one word like "businesswomen"?

>Sweetie began pushing her sister in the direction//

Odd phrasing. In the direction of what?

>her sisters grasp//

Another missing apostrophe.

>What has gotten in to you//

into

>Still not trusting her sister//

This is borderline, but it's still kind of explaining a character motive where it would be more engaging to imply it through her behavior.

>Sweetie’s ears perked up and she looked past Rarity as Apple Bloom and Scootaloo led a pony over to them.//

Needs a comma.

>in confusion//

>Twilight looked even more confused.//
Make her act confused. Don't tell me she is.

>Rarity was finding this conversation much easier than she had anticipated it being. Of course her stomach was fluttering a little, but the words were easy to say.//

A bunch of "to be" verbs again. 4 in only 2 sentences.

>The wing she was raising to shield her eyes and she looked through the crowd was only partially extended and a hoof hung inches from the ground.//

I think you typed a wrong word in there, and it's missing at least one comma.

>“Me either,” Rarity said as she giggled.//

I guess she's making a joke? Because she's liked mares at least as far back as she told Sweetie Belle who her crush was.

>And let’s not dress up, this time.//

This implies there was another time. When was that? Or are they dressed up right now? You haven't described their outfits, if that's the case.

>a blush coloring her cheeks//

She was already blushing.

>I’ve been rambling about you for ages to her.//

I just want to flag this for now, as it's something I'll discuss at the end.

>pressing a kiss to her cheek//

They've only just agreed to a date, and Twilight's already going to kiss her?

>It was the first date Sweetie Belle.//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>she bit her lip again, looking down at the carpet.//

There's no speaking action here, so it needs to be capitalized.

>I’m so proud of you, little sister.//

Capitalize the family relation when used as a term of address.

>Rarity snuggled next to Sweetie//

Sweetie Belle just did this 2 paragraphs ago.

>Maybe the struggled would continue//

Typo.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2565

>>2564
I swear I read a story with almost this exact premise. It took me a while to find it, but I finally did.

Anyway, on the more mundane side, you have a curious set of mechanical problems, like consistently missing apostrophes. A few stylistic things, too, like instances of repetition, clumps of participles and "to be" verbs, and having the narrator tell me how characters feel instead of putting it on display. You also need to decide whether you want an omniscient or limited narrator. In large part, it sounds omniscient, but it slips into a limited feel in a small number of places, so it's probably easier to purge those than to recast the whole thing as limited.

Plotwise, there were two things that bugged me. First, Sweetie Belle's seemingly instantaneous change of attitude, which I've already remarked on. The other is this Rarity/Twilight shipping. It's completely extraneous to the story. It feels wedged in and completely unnecessary. It's just forced, and it doesn't even come up until late in the story. Then you play it so coy about revealing whom she loves, when it doesn't even end up being important, which is a common trope in romances. I get that maybe Sweetie Belle is facilitating that as a thank-you to Rarity, plus there's a weak tie to whether there's space available in Rarity's bed at the end, but you never make a point out of either one of those. So it just ends up feeling like a tangential, tacked-on thing that doesn't go anywhere. Let me get back to that line I tagged earlier where Twilight revealed she'd liked Rarity for some time. This is very, very cliched. So many of the shipping stories out there are of the "pony A reveals a long-standing crush on pony B, who instantly and conveniently reciprocates, revealing she'd also harbored a secret crush" variety. So it's both cookie-cutter and unimportant, which are very hard things to recover from. At the very least, you could make this come across more realistically, but I'd encourage you to find a way to tie it in with what themes you want the story to carry. There are lots of ways you could. Maybe Sweetie Belle's prior realization of the crush made her see that Rarity might not always have the same amount of time available for her sister, and the depression from that was a factor in causing her bulimia, then acting as a matchmaker shows she's gotten over that? Maybe Rarity notices this, and it makes her feel conflicted about dating? Maybe Sweetie Belle is trying to live vicariously through Rarity, since she feels like her own life is a wreck? Do something. Make it matter that this happened in the story, or you're better off without it.

Actually, I thought of another. You make such a big deal about the confrontation with her parents, but it's so anticlimactic. Rarity tells them off and kicks them out, but the next time we see them, they just dance around the subject without resolving anything, and Sweetie Belle doesn't stick around for it. And at their next appearance, they're at the party, and everything's hunky-dory. There's a lot of important stuff that apparently happened behind the scenes, but it just feels strangely dropped.

The thing is, this is very close to working, but all these little issues add up. I'd like to see this succeed, so if you have any questions, please ask. A lot of it is fine, so I'd only want to spot-check it when it came back, though I would read through the material for the parents and shipping plot points in full again. As such, you can mark it as "back from Mars" when you're ready to resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2569

I was really hoping you'd take the initiative to scour the story on your own, as I only listed examples, not an exhaustive record. I can't spend the kind of time it'd take to go through a story of this length word by word, so if you can tame this issue enough so that a cursory glance doesn't turn much up, that's fine. The point is to look for places where you directly use mood or emotion words, like sadness, excitement, frustration, relief, anger.

Here are a few more I see just by skimming chapter 1:
look of worry and compassion
voice sharpening with anger
Nebula's voice held a cold touch of anger. (these two occur quite close together, too)
her lips curled in distaste

Basically, whenever you outright name a mood or emotion, you should be thinking about how you can have the character display it instead of stating it for the reader. Sometimes that just means eliminating the word, as the sentence already conveys such. Sometimes it means adding in some sort of facial expression, body language, etc. And again, these are just a few quick examples I spotted, not anything close to a complete list of them in chapter 1.

>She—" he glanced beyond her shoulder, to where they had left Nightmare Moon, "—collapsed//

Don't end a narrative aside in a quote with a comma. You don't need end punctuation, unless you want an exclamation mark or question mark.

Another thing I'd mentioned once before that's worth having a look for yourself is when you start a bunch of paragraphs in a short space with the same thing. So look near the end of chapter 4, for example, and see all those short paragraphs that alternate beginning with Nightmare or Nebula.

>Most ponies were insensible to nighttime color//

I think you meant "insensitive."

Okay, last time I did a full read, you only had 4 chapters, so forging ahead into new territory!

>Sometimes they can make their way into the dream realms, and stalk a pony's sleep//

>He shuddered, and silently cursed himself.//
It's worth scanning for these as well. Usually, you only need a comma with a conjunction when there's a whole new subject-verb pair, not just multiple verbs for a single subject:
He did this and did that.
He did this, and he did that.

>He heard alarm in her tone, and a desperate wish to dissuade Nightmare.//

Yeah, you're really blunt about some character motivations as well. Try to think more of a cause-effect relationship, like the high pitch of her tone she always got when losing an argument. That's the evidence, and the reader can then deduce Nebula's getting desperate.

>and the ground had a scraggly carpet of ferns//

Extraneous space.

>But Sky could sense even to her that answer seemed facile.//

That's a fairly convoluted wording. I had to read it a couple times to parse it.

>“It's not like I'm truly competent to deal with,” he gestured around him, “this.”//

You used narrative aside format correctly earlier in the story. For quick reference, I have one pulled out as an excerpt above. Do this one the same way.

>astonishment splaying across his face//

>a pained expression on his face//
>a sad look//
>an irritated shake of his head//
>heart pounding in dread//
>in outraged surprise//
>in wry amusement//
>a sad look//
I'm not close to being exhaustive, but I'll pick out a few spots where you blatantly tell the reader how a character feels. It does seem like you're doing somewhat better at it than in the first couple chapters, though.

>flightpath//

That's two words. Ctrl-f for it as there are more than one instance.

>His voice quavered as he gasped out “What...?”//

Missing punctuation.

>confounding her pursuit//

More confounding her pursuers. If it was confounding her pursuit, that would mean Nebula was having trouble following someone.

>making a heavy gamble that he would make//

Watch that close repetition.

>neither could properly close with the other//

>Neither could properly close with the other.//
These are in consecutive paragraphs.

>ever twisting//

Hyphenate.

>Sky grit his teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>the most important contribution//

Extraneous space.

>lay shattered in the middle of the clearing. Splintered chunks of wood lay//

Repetition.

>about the Nebula's injury//

Extraneous word.

>Soarin was trying to reason with him.//

>darted and struck//
Extraneous space.

>Soarin said “I//

Missing comma.

You really like to use semicolons before conjunctions, and I haven't seen a case yet where a simple comma wouldn't do the job. You want the story to be memorable for what happens, not because of your writing tics. It's one thing to do so in narration, but it's exceedingly strange to do so in dialogue, because it suggests all these characters identically know how to use semicolons, but would identically choose to speak in a way that makes them evident.

>and caught Nebula murmuring “Sorry//

Missing punctuation.

>reared up in panic and tried to throw her off, but Nebula's grip was solid. For a moment they struggled, rearing up//

Repetition.

>to skim past the vesperquine//

Keep in mind Sky is your limited narrator. Is he really gong to refer to himself with something so external as "the versperquine"?

>With renewed vigor he punched at Soarin's back, this time with discipline.//

Kind of repetitive phrasing.

>back to the attack, coming up behind Soarin just as the pegasus was pulling back//

Repetition.

>it's weathered shape//

Its/it's confusion.

>at his chest//

Extraneous space.

>back and began the flight back //

Repetition.

>so that by the time he returned//

Comma after this to set off the dependent clause.

>she said “You//

Missing punctuation.

>She interrupted him, her voice filled with a quiet intensity.//

A couple things here. First, you have his dialogue end in an ellipsis, whereas a dash would indicate an interruption. Second, like I've said, when the punctuation already indicates an interruption, you don't need the narration repeating the effect. And third, it defeats the sense of interruption to have the narrator able to wedge this comment in there. When something get interrupted, the very next thing should be what interrupts it, not an explanation.

>though she knows it not//

Why's she getting all poetic? She doesn't exactly have the time for it, but more to the point, she hasn't spoken this way before. Why's she going to start now?

>A breeze skirled its way across the grasses//

You'll be lucky to get a single reader who knows what "skirl" means, and there's zero context to deduce a meaning, since none of it deals with sound. Most people will assume it's a synonym for "swirl."

>while we lay helpless//

Lay/lie confusion. They can be tough to keep straight.

>yet to Sky she seemed to carry a subtle exhaustion in her every step. And yet,//

Repetition. And there's no reason to have that comma.

>harrumph//

You don't need to italicize that.

>they might rather a clean death//

That phrasing is off.

>saw it's ruinous state//

Its/it's confusion.

Nebula's speech is sounding awfully grandiose for her again. She uses typical coarse drill sergeant language, and now we get "she settled upon a crumbling stele"? That just doesn't fit your characterization of her.

>he glanced back at Nebula with a forlorn look//

Another spot where you directly identify an emotion, but I'm singling it out because you have him describing his own facial expression. How can he see it? And even if he could, why is that what's revealing the emotion behind it? Do you have to look in a mirror to know you're happy?

>posed a challenge the righteousness of her fury//

Missing word.

>But he did not question her, or push at her as Nebula had done. He flew off her right wing, and left her to her own considerations.//

Just another couple of examples. I haven't been marking these, but neither comma here is needed.

>And yet, her stars were beautiful. And yet, she had spared a moment of concern for Nebula.//

More unneeded commas and repetitive phrasing.

>he added “I was admiring//

Missing punctuation.

>“A few...” he trailed off//

Redundant.

>Pinky Pie//

Spelling.

>at least that one crime would not accrue to his princess//

That's a really weird phrasing.

>Wha—,//

Don't put a comma with a dash.

>River dragons//

Doesn't he call himself a sea serpent?

>He had nothing to cut with//

What about his wing claws?

>Sky wasn't sure what a Discord was//

There's a statue of him right next to where Sky works. He's not aware of the history?

>so understand her so//

Redundant use of "so." You only need one of these.

>added “It//

Missing punctuation.

>but before he could act//

Needs a comma after this for the dependent clause.

>ancient door shut. Some ancient//

Repetition.

>They have ossified Sky Diamond//

Without a comma for direct address, she's saying the elements turned Sky to stone.

>a grand spiral stair//

You're using "grand" a lot lately.

>in—“//

Dashes can break smart quotes. It's got these ones backward. It's worth scanning for any quotes you have ending in dashes to make sure there aren't any more.

>She rounded on him furiously.//

She just did that not long ago.

>And also, because Princess Celestia floated by his side.//

No need for that comma.

>with a sad expression in her eyes//

More blatant telling.

>Yet she was small; but a youth, and nothing like the stately creature depicted throughout centuries of vesperqune art.//

Misused semicolon.

>"It is still too soon to give up, my little pony.//

You use fancy-style quotation marks throughout the story, but for some reason, you have simple ones here. Check your quotation marks and apostrophes to make sure you're consistent.

>back until his back//

Repetition.

>of his wings//

>she believed//
Extraneous space.

>And yet, he had spoken truth nonetheless.//

No grammatical reason to have a comma there.

>“Will you accept my friendship,” Celestia asked//

Then why isn't there a question mark?

>A storm of emotions passed over her face.//

Don't I get to see any of them?

>He wanted to rush down, to stand with her, but this choice she could only make on her own.//

You, know, you're saying a lot of the same stuff over and over again in this scene. Furthermore, you're not really framing it as a struggle. It's tough to do, because the struggle is Luna's, not Sky's, so his viewpoint is external to that. In some places you do have him struggle alongside her, but a lot of the time, you're merely having him voice "what's she going to do?" over and over again, stretched out to a couple thousand words. It's creating false suspense, since Sky isn't at an epiphany here. I'd say either get more into his personal investment of what he's watching or focus on the outward signs that Luna's really struggling, so at least the reader can see that inner conflict vicariously through Sky's observation of it. It's a tad on the clinical side now, but not to the point I'd refuse to post it unless you changed it. I just think it's not achieving the power it could.

So I'd never read these last three chapters on your previous submissions. They hadn't been posted yet the first time, and I think maybe one of them had been added by the second. So it's not surprising I'd find more stuff in there to correct. That's fine.

What still does need attention is those blunt depictions of emotion. You actually do fine through much of the middle of the story, but I suspect that's serendipitous, as it shows up again in a couple of the newer chapters, so it doesn't appear to be the case of something you learned as you wrote. Chapter 1 is critical to get right, since that's the one where people decide whether they're going to stick with it or not. Sure there are other reasons you can lose readers as the story progresses, but you can tell the stories that just don't get chapter 1 right, as there's a big drop-off in readers over the next one or two chapters, or more so than normal. I don't want to see that happen here.

So as I said before, read through and notice any time you use a word that outright names a mood or emotion, then think about how you can imply it instead. Here's a quick example.

He walked happily as he entered the room, wearing a self-satisfied smile and gleefully humming a tune.

That's bad. I've named three moods: happily, self-satisfied, and gleefully. How does someone walk happily? There's not a set image that comes to mind. I can make one up, but them I'm doing the author's job. Try this version:

He practically skipped into the room, a bright, sunny tune perched on his lips. "Now, that's my kind of day!" he said through his enormous smile.

A lot of people think showing means throwing more words into a description, and while it can tend to be wordier than telling, it doesn't have to be. Look at my descriptions. Not once did I say how he feels, but it's painted so clearly, and through things an observer could easily detect: how he acts, what he says, his body language and facial expression. There's no question what this looks like, and you can read his feelings from it without my ever having to say what they were.

That's all you're missing, and while the whole story could use a sweep for it, the first couple chapters are the worst at it. If you can get it to where a quick skim of chapters 1 and 2 doesn't immediately turn up a dozen examples of this, I'd be happy to post it. I think you'll find it's a much more engaging way to read and write characters. As such, I won't need a full reread, so you're almost there. Mark it as "back from Mars" when you resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2575

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Lyra Heartstrings'//

This is a common problem when authors use multiple places to edit stories. You have a simple-style apostrophe here, where in general you use fancy-style apostrophes and quotation marks. Keep them consistent.

>the lime-green mare//

A little of this kind of reference goes a long way. It's generally not a good idea to use them very much. Here, you've already said "mint-green" in the previous scene, so not only is it contradictory, it's just repeating information we already know: that she's green.

>Did you sleep okay?” The cream-coated candy maker replied with a smile.//

When a speech tag doesn't begin the sentence, it doesn't get capitalized.

>out of you tail//

Typo.

>Pegasi worked the sky, pulling clouds out of storage and carefully placing them to accent the clear, blue sky.//

Try to avoid close repetition of all but the most mundane words, like the two instances of "sky" here.

>A flash of stripes on blue coat//

Missing word.

>Glancing over at the mare, Ditzy Doo’s smile turned into a look of surprise//

A couple problems here. First, you have a dangling participle. "Glancing over at the mare" is supposed to describe Ditzy, but this says Ditzy's smile glanced over. Now look at the context of emotion. The smile is indirect, but the reader can intuit friendliness from it. However, you directly feed me the surprise. I know what a smile looks like, but there are many ways someone can look surprised. You're making me invent it, but I don't actually need to, since you've already given me the conclusion. Making me interpret cues from the character is how you get me to engage with them. Think more in terms of what evidence I could observe if I were there. Don't draw the conclusions for me. Same as an actor on stage. He doesn't tell you how he feels. He looks and acts certain ways to convey his character's emotion to you.

>fell- directly//

Please use a proper dash. This is a recurring issue.

>Lyra’s heart began thudding in her chest, eyes growing wide, pupils shrinking.//

This paragraph definitely cements that you're using a limited narrator, as you have the narration speak Lyra's internal opinions and impressions for her. So you have to be careful that what you say is reasonable in that respect. She can't see her pupils shrinking, so how does she know it's happening? Then you go on in the next sentence to say she doesn't know any of this. If she doesn't, then a limited narrator in her perspective can't, either.

>the screaming mare//

Now that I know you're using a limited narrator, it's even more unreasonable for the narration to use descriptors like this, particularly about Lyra herself. This implies that in her own mind, Lyra would refer to herself as "the screaming mare" or "the mint-green unicorn" or any other of these you use. Or for that matter, it also implies she'd internally refer to Bon Bon as "the cream-coated mare," and people just don't do that with others they know well.

>She could see the gleaming crystal palace off in the distance; its usually distracting size and shine now a beacon of hope.//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to replace it with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>Breath//

That's the noun. You were going for the verb.

>with confusion and concern//

More directly naming emotions.

>Lyra was jolted back to reality as she fell onto the floor of a back room of Sugarcube Corner. The unicorn looked back at her captor.//

More repetition. Three instances of "back" in two sentences.

>W-Well//

Only capitalize the first one, unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>8 years ago//

It's preferred to spell out relatively short numbers.

>Her ‘mane’, was made not of hairs//

Why is that comma there?

>thestralwings//

Missing space.

>cutiemark//

That's two words.

>hippocampus//

*groan* Is this where they go to college?

>But other than that, life had been rather mundane, even by non-Ponyville standards.//

Here's another thing worth sweeping your story for. The next three paragraphs have an awful lot of "to be" verbs: been, was, be, been, was, be, was. These are inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens. They can make a story stagnate. It's impractical to remove them from a story completely, but it makes your story more engaging to phrase things with active verbs as much as possible.

>A nervous-looking Pinkie pie//

Don't tell me she's nervous. Paint a picture of her as nervous. Capitalization error, too. But man. I've already explained it, but read the section on LUS at the top of this thread. I'm only a few paragraphs into the scene, and we already have the unicorn, the eldritch pony, the unicorn (again), the eldritch pony (again), and the green mare.

Pinkie's speech here sure doesn't sound much like Pinkie.

>And so, it falls on us to keep Equestria safe.//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>Lyra was shocked.//

So make her act shocked. Make the narration sound shocked.

>Octavia’s…nose?//

Leave a space after an ellipsis.

>Octavia is-“//

I've already said to use dashes for interruptions, not hyphens, but also note here how both can break smart quotes. These are backward.

>heavy-hitters//

You don't need to hyphenate that.

>“Indeed. How have you been?//

Missing closing quotation marks.

>whyHowling//

Missing space, and when already in italics, show emphasis by going back to normal font. Underlining is more for written items, like a letter or diary entry. You do this again later at the end of chapter 7.

>Octavia interrupted//

An interruption is already apparent from your use of a dash. You don't need to repeat the effect in the narration. The same would go for saying someone trailed off when you'd already used an ellipsis.

>“That’s good to hear,” Lyra started, “But I was more concerned for you.”//

Your use of commas on both sides of the tag indicates you intend the quote to be a single sentence, but if so, you've capitalized in the middle of it.

>12//

Write out short numbers.

>Atrophy did the rest//

I'm not sure that's the best word choice. It connotes wasting away of specifically muscle tissue from lack of use of disease. And it generally occurs over long periods of time. Neither would seem to apply here. And neither would repel scavengers.

>Poisonous bites//

Bites aren't poisonous. They're venomous.

>“RKKKK-SHAAA!” It cried//

Capitalization.

>You invade MY territory,” Her legs grew thicker as her mane shrank.//

You've punctuated that like it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking action. And you do it again in the next paragraph.

>still recovering//

Hyphenate.

>But what does-” the green mare’s eyes widened.//

Capitalization. And please use a dash.

>I don’t think either Vinyl or myself would feel comfortable//

Don't use reflexive pronouns in the nominative case. "Vinyl or I would feel comfortable"

>Dj’s//

DJ’s. Scan through the chapter for this.

>By the way, your mental defenses are paper thin, you’ll want to work on that.//

Comma splice.

>Haysead//

Did you mean hayseed?

>40//

Spell it out.

>This earned a snort from the usually refined mare.//

Why did you italicize "snort"? It's not a good idea to have sound effects in narration, but as it's a valid word anyway, it's fine without the italics. I don't see what the emphasis adds.

>as it was located to the right of the front door, it was decorated in tasteful browns and greens, with a distinctly traditional musical theme.//

I'm not looking for screencaps to verify, but my impression is you have that backwards. I think Vinyl's half was on the right. Left side of the screen, but on someone's right who had come in the front door.

>‘Tavi//

You don't need the apostrophe for a nickname.

>Thank you Vinyl.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>190//

>200//
Those are also short enough to write out.

>She was a noble’s daughter, he’d been locking her in the basement of his mansion every full moon.//

Comma splice.

>a look of worried frustration//

Wow, you even wedged two direct emotions into that one. Make her act worried and frustrated, and you'll never have to use the words.

>dinner!” as she ranted//

That's not a speech tag.

>nine hours?//

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on a word italicized for emphasis, inlcude it in the italics.

>look of genuine worry//

Whenever you use a word that's a literal emotion or mood, you need to think about how you can get the character to demonstrate it instead.

>Bon Bon said nothing, just pulled her in tighter.//

Wait, Octavia and Vinyl pretty much indicated that Bon Bon already knew about this organization and had retired from it. And that if they'd invited her to dinner, it would cause problems. So how doesn't it cause the same problems for Bon Bon to know that's where Lyra spent her evening? Or is Bon Bon part of a different organization that wouldn't look kindly on this one? You could make that clearer. And Bon Bon already knows something about this Truth, too. How is she not putting two and two together?

>Lyra once again checked piece of pink stationary//

Missing word, and you've confused stationary/stationery.

>Good morning Dinky!//

Missing comma.

>recently-made//

You don't need hyphens in two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb.

>finish putting lunch together for the foals, and then we can get going.” Ditzy finished with the sandwiches, then carried a pair of plates over to the table and a pair/

Repetition of "finish" and "pair."

>this is Lyra Heartstrings, she’s an old friend of your cousin’s.//

Comma splice.

>Miss//

Only capitalize that when it's attached to a name.

>Hi mom//

However, family relations do get capitalized when used as names.

>the two ponies shared a quick hug.//

Capitalization.

>Hey Sparks//

You have lots of these greetings in this chapter that need commas for direct address. I don't know why, but the editing is noticeably worse in this chapter than the last.

>Now out, she began to carefully screw several of the components together.//

You mean the machinery is now out, right? Because the way you've phrased it, Ditzy is.

>two meter-wide//

Hyphenate all that.

>22 minutes and 17//

Write out the numbers.

>Plus, it helps to know what you’re talking about when dealing with time travelers.//

That comma shouldn't be there.

>Giving her head a quick shake//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>I’m sorry Lyra//

Missing comma.

>have,“ She looked over at her granddaughter for a moment, “two//

If you want the narrator to cut into a quote, here's how to do it:
have—” she looked over at her granddaughter for a moment “—two
Note that that first set of quotes is backward. Also notice how the aside doesn't get capitalized or take end punctuation (though you can use an exclamation mark or question mark where appropriate,

>hello!!//

One of those is plenty.

>Bye grandma!//

Missing comma.

>I got directly exposed to the time stream gained my futuresight ability//

Missing comma or conjunction or something.

>35//

Spell it out.

>her and Time Turner’s families//

she

>“But… But…!”//

That punctuation combo doesn't make sense. How do you trail off emphatically?

>an almost pained look//

How can she see her own face to evaluate it as such? She's your perspective character.

The beginning of chapter 11 has an awful lot of "to be" verbs again.

>100%//

Write it out.

>It took a few seconds for her to notice the lack of response.//

What's with all the line breaks before this? Is it supposed to denote a pause? I don't think you can rely on the reader figuring that out. It just comes across as a poor scene break.

>making or ponies making//

Repetition.

>Her statuesque stillness deeply unnerved Lyra.//

Then make the narration sound unnerved.

>Eyes rolled up into her head, her paler-than-normal coat shone with sweat.//

This makes it sound like her coat has its eyes rolled up.

>“Oh, thank Celestia.” The filly said, relief filling her voice.//

Punctuation, capitalization, blunt emotional telling.

>clearly exhausted//

If it's so clear, let me see it and judge for myself.

>That’s why everypony’s looking for her, the paper rips itself apart when it tries to take her over.//

Comma splice.

>made out of magic and souls!”//

This paragraph ends with Winter Bell's dialogue, and the next picks up immediately again with it, so it's customary to leave off the closing quotation marks here.

>‘Course//

You're not eliding any letters from the word, so you don't need an apostrophe.

These chatpers with Winter Bell are falling into the trap of not having much narration to break up the dialogue. Speech tags really do nothing to that end, so keep in mind these characters are supposed to act like real people who do things as they talk, plus you can work in scenery here and there. Leaning so heavily on dialogue tends to make it feel detached.

>*Whoosh!*//

Don't put sound effects in narration like that. Just describe what happens.

>pleased-with-herself looking//

Hyphenate all that.

>at Lyra’s dumbfounded look//

A very external evaluation of Lyra's expression she's unlikely to make of herself as the limited narrator.

>a sharp crack.//

Sound effects again. This one's a valid word as is, so just get rid of the italics. Same thing later in the same paragraph.

>was where she was//

Repetitive, but also two very boring verbs.

>apple shaped//

Hyphenate.

>Possessing a dark green coat, the unicorn’s off-white mane hung//

This says her mane possessed a dark green coat.

>“AND,” she smashed the book into Twilight’s face, “YOU//

Use the narrative aside formatting I showed you earlier.

>The intense pain flooded Lyra’s nervous system; she couldn’t move, couldn’t think properly. She just lay against the wall, stunned and vulnerable.//

Yet none of this limited narration makes her sound stunned or in pain.

>determination and restrained fury in her eyes//

Make a visual. Let me see it.

>There was a blinding flash of light as the concentrated magic ball exploded against the leather-bound book.//

Look at this paragraph. In the first three sentences, you have four "as" clauses. Not only is that repetitive in structure, having two in one sentence can upset the chronology, since it tries to make bunch of things happen at the same time.

>having recovered somewhat//

And now this is the third time in only a few sentences that you use a "having" absolute phrase.

>THEIF//

Spelling. And for all these caps she like to use, it's preferred to use italics for emphasis.

>barely-conscious//

You don't need a hyphen here.

>snap//

Leave off the italics. Both times you use it.

>I’ll carry you out, we don’t want to be here when Twilight and her friends wake up.//

Comma splice.

>So far, no conclusion had been reached, or at least none had been released to the public.//

I don't see the advantage of phrasing all that in passive voice.

>visits. Celestia and Luna had arrived first, followed not long after by Cadance and Shining Armor, to visit//

Repetition.

>stand-still//

standstill

Hm, lots of "to be" verbs in chapter 13, too.

>hotsauce//

That's two words. Again, later in the paragraph.

>That girl loves what doing what we do.//

Extraneous word.

>secret-“ she held up a hoof to stave off Lyra’s reply. “And//

There's that aside formatting again.

>recently-polished//

No hyphen.

>the ex-agent//

Another odd reference for Lyra to use.

>that Pinkie liked to conduct Owl business in//

Just change "that" to "where" and you can get rid of that nasty dangling preposition.

>wondering where Pinkie was going with this//

When you have a narrator this limited, there are certain verbs you really don't need to use. Some are perception verbs, like "see." It's implicit that Lyra can see whatever the narrator describes, so you don't have to add that she sees it. Then there are knowledge verbs, like wish, want, wonder, think, know, and hope. Just have the narrator wonder this for her. It puts me much more in touch with the character if the narrator asks the question representing this wonder instead of relaying to me that Lyra wondered this.

>On, nothing//

Typo.

>really; alignments don’t really//

>looking for a late-night snack happens to look//
Repetition.

>party.” Pinkie finished//

Punctuation.

>CRASH//

Lower case and no italics is fine.

>as it span//

spun

>The strange and alien sounds that danced at the edge of her consciousness disturbed her, but the mare paid them no mind.//

That's seemingly contradictory. She can hear them, but she doesn't pay attention, even though they disturb her, but the narration sounds completely calm.

>As Lyra carefully a corner//

Missing word.

>neither to thought, nor to words//

You don't need the comma, and I think it would be clearer if you made it a compound infinitive, i.e., "to neither thought nor words,"

>way it wormed into her consciousness, echoing within her mind in such a way//

Repetition.

>uad//

Was that supposed to be "Maud"? If so, you've got a couple letters swapped.

>Oh, no madam//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Lyra thought to herself//

Authors like to use this phrase, but really, who else would she think to?

>Cant//

Missing apostrophe.

>Breath//

That's the noun. The verb is "breathe."

>Lyra was released from the death-grip.//

You're using a lot of passive voice in this chapter. I didn't pull any out until now, but it's getting to be too much. Here are the ones I passed over earlier:
>she was greeted by the white buildings//
>She was suddenly pulled into a bone-crushing hug//

>Although, it took a little while for us to figure out what he was saying//

No reason to have that comma. And the comma following this is a splice.

>‘cause//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first.

>but once we did//

Needs a comma after this.

>He was shortly followed by a pony//

More passive voice.

>You should still be aware of what transpired, but not be able to remember details, does that sound about right?//

That last comma is a splice.

>Dissonance grew offended.//

Don't say this. Demonstrate it.

>forget.” He replied simply.//

Punctuation/capitalization

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2576

>>2575
This was a cute and clever story. It does need a little work, but a lot of that is cosmetic. I've marked enough examples of the mechanical stuff that you should have a good picture of what to fix. The main stylistic things are blunt emotional conveyance (there's a brief discussion of that at the top of this thread under "show versus tell"), Lavender Unicorn Syndrome (also covered at the top of this thread, and note that it's a particularly poor match for a limited narration), and talking heads at times (also at the top of this thread), as well as a fair amount of word repetition.

The only larger point I wanted to make was about there being no apparent direction to the story. It's episodic in nature, which is fine, but this far into the story, I still see no direction. There's no goal in sight of what Lyra or this organization wants to accomplish, and aside from an initial struggle to understand who the Owls are and what they want, there's no conflict beyond the obvious physical ones. But except for the generic "keep Equestria safe from these monsters," there's no objective to it all. Let me put it to you this way: the main thing that most stories should accomplish is to set up and resolve a conflict or show character growth. I don't see either one so far. There's no evidence that we won't just keep seeing more and more episodes tacked on without any sense that the story is actually going somewhere. And Lyra's character has been very static. She gains knowledge, but she's not changing in any substantial or fundamental ways.

I kept waiting for that to happen. Through the first few episodes, I was enjoying the story a lot, but the further I read, the more I wondered why there wasn't any direction to the story, and Lyra's not developing her character in any way. I don't have some new appreciation for her in chapter 16 that I didn't have in chapter 2. That's the thing that bothered me the most, not only because it leaves the overarching story feeling directionless, but it also involves more work to fix, and I'm hoping you're willing to do that work, since I like the story.

What's your endgame? I see from the extended synopsis in the submission form that you do have a plan. But after reading 17 chapters, it sure doesn't feel like there's one, and that's an awful lot to ask a reader to wade through without an indication that it's actually going somewhere. The more you can plant seeds early on that the Owls have specific plans for Lyra past some generic "keep Equestria safe," the more coherent the story feels, and the more momentum you give the story. Take your description that the supposedly dead mare figures in prominently. Those chapters have zero foreshadowing that I could pick up. It's one thing for you to mention the fact of this dead mare and have it turn out to be important, but it's quite enough to give that fact apparent weight when it's initially stated. Add some emphasis here and there, some details that there are plans going on behind the scenes, and it'll make for a far more coherent story with a reason for me to keep reading it. The thing is—that's probably not even very hard to do. So far, it comes across as true slice of life, something with little continuity and low stakes. Each episode does have its own stakes, but nothing compelling pushing into the next one and the next, and that's not the feeling you want from an adventure. To borrow from gaming, it's like I'm seeing a bunch of side quests without ever feeling like there's a main story arc. So give me some hints that there's a main quest going on behind it all, because that's what's really missing so far.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2594

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Equestria's far boarder//

Unless the nation is in the habit of renting out its spare room, you want "border." I'll also note that this conceit of having a character looking over the town from a high place is pretty cliched.

>other - it//

Please use proper dashes. Hyphens are for hyphenated terms and stutters.

>even among the last of the summer sun sets//

sunsets

>Yet, life had a funny way of twisting things//

There's rarely a reason to put a comma after a conjunction. It doesn't belong here.

>But, he couldn't think about it that way//

Yeah, you need to stop doing that. I'm not going to mark any more.

>That beautiful, stunning, magnificent mare he'd loved and admired ever since the day they'd met years ago.//

You have the narrator directly expressing his opinion here, so you're using a limited narrator. Essentially, Spike is the narrator, and that implies a lot. One problem I already see with is is your use of descriptors like "the adolescent dragon." This means that he's choosing to refer to himself in such a way, which is just strange. People don't think of themselves so externally.

>That wasn't to say he didn't like being her little Spikey-Wikey of course, it was a role he often preferred to being Twilight's number one assistant in fact.//

Comma splice.

>Another wave of selfish frustration//

Be careful of directly naming emotions like this. Consider the characters as your stage actors, putting on a play for the reader. Actors don't just come out and say how their characters feel. They make sure they look and behave in certain ways to get that emotion across to the audience. This is how people normally read each other in real life—by observation—so it feels much more authentic to do it like this. Make him look and act frustrated, and since you hae a limited narrator, have the narrative tone reflect it as well. Have the narrator make a frustrated-sounding comment.

>Whatever love is, I won't find it here anymore. He thought to himself emptily.//

There's a guide at the top of this thread to proper capitalization and punctuation when transitioning between quotation and speech tag.

>his frustration becoming confusion//

Read the section on "show versus tell" at the top of this thread, too. Whenever you use an emotion or mood word directly, you need to think how you can demonstrate it instead of just naming it.

>she... .//

Don't add a period after an ellipsis.

>some form of consort//

I assume you mean "concert."

>Spike couldn't help but noticed//

notice

>Neither did I Spike//

Missing comma for direct address.

>his embarrassed look//

Here's another problem with naming the emotion: To evaluate his expression as "embarrassed," on would have to be able to see it, since he's the limited narrator. How can he see his own face? You have to consider how he'd perceive his own mood.

>attempting to be reassuring//

Just as bad as spelling out character emotion is spelling out their motivations.

>the unicorns' words of kindness//

There's only one unicorn there, right?

Your perspective starts to wander. For a short stretch, you have the narration expressing Sweetie Belle's thoughts and impressions, but you quickly go back to Spike.

>He may never win the heart of the pony he loved, but in doing so he'd seemingly won the heart of another. A pony that was so much like her, and possibly more.//

This sure makes it sound like he's settling, which isn't an inspiring sentiment. For that matter, this is a very common way to have a shipping story play out, how Sweetie confesses she's had a crush on Spike, and he quickly realizes, hey, he's really had one as well. It's very convenient, to the point it's both cliched and not very realistic. The trick is to make this come across as something that could happen in real life. When you're treading on well-mined ground, you have to do something to stand out, and authenticity is the best way.

Yeah, so Spike, who's never really considered loving Sweetie Belle, suddenly is in love with her to the point he's agreeing to see the world with her. You're not really selling the relationship so much as hoping the reader will just take your word for it. What is it that makes these two work as a couple and belong together? I don't know what either one likes about the other, what they would give and take. Building the relationship is as important as developing a character. If you care to look it up, Aragon wrote a blog post some months ago about making realistic relationships. It'd be worth reading.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2611

>two-thousand//
In numbers, hyphens only go between the tens and ones places.

>eeked//

eked

>every step he took snapped or cracked as if he was determined to jump on every//

Watch the repetition.

>shifting a fallen branch out of his way with magic and stepping over it.//

You just got through saying he seemed to step on everything he came across, and the first time you get to an example of such, the opposite occurs. In fact, going back to that prior reference, it was an external evaluation of it, not something introspective. In short, it sounds like something someone else would have asid about him, yet by a couple paragraphs after this one, you're taking a very limited narration in his perspective. You start out more omniscient to set the scene, which is fine, but when you ease into a viewpoint, make sure everything you say is consistent with it, and the comment about him stepping on everything doesn't sound like something he'd say about himself, at least as it's stated. Keep their attitude in mind. If Sparky had made the comment, she'd probably be a little exasperated about it, while Starbound would be more self-deprecating, and the difference between the two is in the details of how it's said, like which words you emphasize.

>Very well, I concede. You lead. But please try to be more careful, agreed?//

All that rhyming creates a playful feel, but none of the characters acknowledge it as such, so I have to assume it wasn't intentional on your part.

>Not wanting to dig himself deeper//

This is a fairly advanced topic, but there are certain verbs governing knowledge and perception that aren't really needed for a limited narration like this one, since the narrator can simply express it on his own. Consider that Starbound effectively is the narrator, so for example, you wouldn't need to say he saw something. Just because the narrator describes it, it implies he saw it; if he didn't, the narrator couldn't have either. The perception verbs are pretty self-explanatory: see, hear, taste, smell, feel. The knowledge ones are things like know, want, wish, wonder, think, and hope. When you explain that he doesn't want this, the narrator's acting less like Starbound and more like an intermediary. To bring it back closer to his own thought process, have the narrator express the want for him, something like "Now to get himself out of the hole he'd dug."

>"It doesn't matter. Stars forbid I ever try to give you something interesting to do."//

Looks like you edited the story in a couple different places. By default, GDocs replaces quotes and apostrophes with the fancy style, which most of your story has, but these are simple, probably edited in a simple word processor or directly on FiMFiction. Make them all consistent. There's the occasional one of these that reverts to simple style as I look through the rest of the chapter.

>ears swivelling//

You'll normally set off an absolute phrase with a comma.

>still unconvinced//

Hyphenate.

>this far inland the soil was tainted by the Wretched Sea. No soldiers ventured this far//

Watch the phrase repetition.

>‘bout//

The automatic fancy-style apostrophes are always backward when you put them on the beginning of a word, since they assume you want a single opening quotation mark. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row then delete the first.

>Starbound opened was about to apologise//

Something got jumbled there.

>hoof-steps//

"Footsteps" is a single word, so I don't know why this would be hyphenated.

>w—,”//

Don't use a comma or period with a dash.

>Sparky furiously shushed him again.//

You just used "furiously" a bit ago. And it's not a word that connotes stealth.

>With a silent series of pained expressions//

First off, let me see them. This is so vague as to have no meaning. Second, remember you're using Starbound's perspective. If he's slung underneath her, particularly when she's significantly smaller, how can he even see her face to notice this?

>in the hope that it would help him blend into the leaf litter//

Another one of those knowledge verbs that the narrator could better express for him instead of attributing it to him.

>He watched as the ponies approached from down the gully. When he saw them//

Why does he not see them until after he watches them approach? This doesn't make sense.

>worse comes to worse//

worse comes to worst

>Oblivious to her insult//

Remember, he's effectively the narrator. If he's oblivious to it, the narrator has to be, too.

>with a confused expression//

You just described Starbound as "shot a confused glare" a bit ago. He'd be a little more blunt about his own emotion, I guess, but have him relate more of the raw evidence he sees from Sparky instead of readily identifying it as confusion. Describe the expression. Stick to facts, not conclusions. Show me what it looks like.

>and its winter time//

Its/it's confusion.

>ground started shaking. A second later, the back wall retracted down into the ground//

Watch that repetition.

>“Please?” She pleaded.//

Redundant.

>She seemed genuinely scared.//

What's his evidence of this? Let me see that, not get his conclusion about it.

>But the soldiers being here, in the Belt//

A comma isn't required here, but if you want one, you need another after this.

>little known//

This sounds odd to me. Is it a British figure of speech or something? I assume it's equivalent to "not to mention."

>lamenting that Sparky hadn’t made a helmet to go with it//

So have the narration lament it for him. That gets the reader a lot closer to the character, which is the whole point of choosing a limited narration.

>Indignation bubbling inside him//

So have the narration get indignant. Whenever you use a word like this that directly spells out a mood or emotion, consider whether there's a better way to give evidence of it through character behavior or narrative tone, where appropriate.

>made him bit his tongue//

Typo.

>harms way//

Missing apostrophe.

>equal measures confused and curious//

More blunt emotion.

>lifesize//

life-size

>perfect hyperbolic spirals//

I don't know what you're going for here. Hyperbolas don't coil; they asymptote into straight lines.

>the air around statue//

Missing word.

>indicating it was protected by a forcefield//

This comes across as dully informative. It's worded like it's something I should know already. More to the point, it doesn't feel like a stream of his thoughts, more like something a narration completely detached from him might say.

>blended with the floor, and his blue fur and black hair blended//

Repetition.

>if he remained still//

Needs a comma after the dependent clause.

>Starbound mentally kicked himself//

This is a symptom of something that's flared up here and there. You tend to use fairly repetitive language for similar situations. Look at all the times Starbound has crept through the cave and peered around a corner. A lot of the same actions, word choices, and descriptions keep popping up. And this must be the third or fourth time you've had him o something like this, and I think the second time you've phrased it exactly like this.

>Of course: glowing magic aura—dead giveaway. Why had he even brought it out?//

But... he already knew that. You explicitly said that it took a glow to keep it ready, but that he felt it was a risk worth taking. So why is he suddenly unaware of it?

>He felt another pang of guilt, met by a small amount of pride for her//

Very blunt with the emotions again.

>I were//

Subject-verb mismatch.

>The stallion glared at her.//

Look at how you've begun the last three paragraphs.

>for more off//

Missing word. Or this is just an expression I'm unfamiliar with.

>“What?” He mouthed.//

Capitalization.

>Starbound made a pleading gesture.//

I don't know what that is. Just tell me what he does. I'm not even sure why he'd be pleading right now, anyway.

>Do you know how to get and audience with Orison?//

Typo.

>which helped him see the soldiers//

This is again quite dry and over-explained for a limited narration. Honestly, it's self-explanatory. I think you could just cut it.

>Maybe the soldiers wouldn’t see them.//

He seems to have made an assumption here. My first thought is that these soldiers, who've clearly been here before, had installed the security system. But then it seems more like it was installed there by whoever made the statue. There's a pretty big difference in context there between whether or not it'd be reasonable to hope he hadn't been seen.

>Forcing a grin, Starbound continued to creep backwards; Sparky doing the same behind him.//

That last part is just an absolute phrase, not an independent clause. Set it off with a comma instead of a semicolon.

>Another one flew by, exploding by Sparky’s head as she stood dumbfounded by the sudden reappearance of the wall.//

You've got three of these "as" clauses in a span of just four sentences. It gets a bit structurally repetitive.

>ract//

Typo.

>The tiniest stretch of his leg sent new waves of pain crashing through him.//

Didn't he earlier describe these things as equal to a wet blanket in effectiveness as a weapon? Or was he only talking about the kind he has? That could be made clearer.

>But before reaching him, a bolt hit her square in the chest.//

A classic dangling participle. "But before reaching him" is supposed to describe Sparky, but it describes the bolt.

>surreal slurred timed//

Typo.

>as her nose filled the acrid stench of burning fur//

Missing word.

>as her nose filled the acrid stench of burning fur//

Hyphenate.

>Rarity turned from the mare to the door; a dented plate of rough and grimy metal, worn smooth in irregular blotches from ponies constantly pushing on it.//

For a semicolon to be used right, you should be able to replace it with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand alone as a sentence.

>She didn’t really care, though, she was going to leave regardless of what the crazy doctor wanted.//

Comma splice.

>It rattled, but didn’t open.//

No comma.

>She glanced back to the doctor who just shrugged and gestured for Rarity to get back on the bed.//

And that one does need a comma.

>She frantically scanned the room for inspiration to hit her.//

This goes back a bit to something I noted for Starbound's narration. She's panicked, but the narration doesn't sound panicked. The narration is essentially Rarity's though process. If you were panicked, how would your thoughts go? They'd likely be emphatic, fractured, short, focused more on observation than interpretation. A narrator this limited should reflect the focus character's mindset and sound not too different from something she might say out loud.

>Neither of the guards was a unicorn//

Needs a comma after this to set off the dependent clause.

>to not//

Reverse these.

>The doctor noticed Rarity//

Well, that's an understatement. There's no reason for the doctor to notice anything but her.

>She refused the look back//

Typo.

>that was as much fear as anger//

That's a very calm assessment for a limited narrator who should be very focused on staying alive instead of being frank about how she truly feels.

>The guard behind exclaimed//

That's a transitive verb; it requires a direect object. What did he exclaim?

>gentle breeze//

How could she notice a gentle breeze when she's running that fast? It'd be indistinguishable from the apparent wind due to her own motion.

>She was free.//

See, here's just an example of how the narrative tone isn't carrying the emotion. At the very least, I'd think she'd exclaim this, maybe even emphasize the last word.

>But Rarity scarcely noticed any of this.//

She sure described it in a lot of detail for someone who barely noticed it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2612

>>2611
>that made Rarity stomach churn//
Missing possessive.

>Rarity summoned her pocket mirror.//

From where? If they've captured her and put her in a bed, why would they let her have personal effects? And how would she even know where they'd put them? For that matter, I can't remember the last chapter even saying that she had such things with her.

>The instant she’d felt the pain, she’d thought back to the crystal.//

Then why am I just not hearing about it? The narration essentially is her thoughts. If the crystal occurred to her right when the pain hit, then that's where the narration should mention it, too.

>Beneath her//

You repeat this phrase with only 7 intervening words.

>bedsheets//

You spelled this as two words before (one is preferred).

>head first//

That's one word, too.

>death!” The stallion exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>thebed//

Missing space and period.

>She carefully patted her chest//

I'm wondering if the crystal is still there. Wouldn't she think of this? If she happened to land on it, bad things could happen.

>“Starbound?” A mare rasped.//

>What’s wrong?” The mare asked.//
Capitalization.

>there were marked difference//

Inconsistent with singular/plural.

>Starbound: you. Are. An. Idiot.//

I'd capitalize the "you" as well, since what the colon refers to is spread over multiple "sentences."

Sparky in particular is using direct address far more often that is reasonable. It helps discern who's speaking, but you can do that with dialogue tags, too.

>Forcing herself out of the conversation//

She hadn't been in it for some time. She even said as much in the narration a while ago.

>Starbound and Sparky paused the bickering to looked at her.//

Typo.

>I— Wait//

Don't leave a space on either side of an em dash.

>‘adventurous of spirit.'//

Note the inconsistency in quotation mark styles.

>but-//

Use a dash for cutoffs.

>I'm quite alright darling//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>possibly… I don’t...//

You've got some inconsistencies here, too. Note how the first ellipsis is a single character, while the second is three separate dots. It'd be easy to do a search and replace to change any instances of three dots into a single-character ellipsis.

>It was just a story, of course this place was riddled with injustice and evil//

Comma splice.

>lest she wound up in a mess like this again///

When you're speaking hypothetically like this, use subjunctive mood, which is essentially the infinitive form: lest she wind up...

>judging their reactions as mixes of confusion and disbelief. Although, Rarity fancied she detected a hint of awe in there as well.//

Show me how they look and let me be the judge.

>mad-mare//

You spelled that without a hyphen last time.

>mopin’”.//

Period's in the wrong spot.

>Aye, I'm not stupid ye know. I just think tryin’ to do somethin’ about the situation rather than lyin’ down and letting it trot all over ye… Well, I think ye got a better chance of survivin’ that way, ye know?//

Repetitive "ye know," plus inconsistent in settig it off with a comma.

>he turned and pushed past Rarity.

>
>He turned around.//
I get what you're going for, but it's not smooth because it isn't clear this isn't a mistake on your part. If you say something like "he turned around again," then you acknowledge and use the repetition. Otherwise, it sounds like you just weren't paying attention.

>‘get over it.'//

>“It’s not real, Rarity," she muttered to herself. "She’s not real.//
More inconsistent quotation mark styles.

>When she got out of this mess, Rarity vowed she would be more empathetic to the plights of characters in stories.//

Watch how this is worded. It sounds like she wouldn't vow to do so until she got out, but it's more that she's vowing now not to belittle characters once she gets out.

>On second thoughts//

That's usually phrased as singular.

>it would seam your friend differs in her opinion//

Seam/seem confusion.

>You'd hate to a little disagreement get in the way of that//

Missing word.

>glancing as his legs, as thin as twigs//

Typo.

>door flap//

You're inconsistent at hyphenating this, too. Here, you have it as a noun, so it doesn't need one. You've given it one in this sense before. If you use it as an adjective, like you did earlier with "door-flap entrance," it does use a hyphen.

>assessing the skills and tools and their disposal //

Typo.

>good idea. She had no idea no idea//

Inadvertent repetition of "no idea," and it's pretty repetitive to have that so soon after the other "idea."

>lettin'//

There's another simple-style apostrophe. I'm sure I'm not catching all of them.

>pegasus'//

Simple apostrophe.

>it’s okay to scared//

>If what say about this place//
Missing word.

>you have every reason in the world to be."//

Simple quotation marks.

>opposed to being draped over it//

That's usually phrased like "as opposed to."

>Rarity shook her head.//

Missing a line break here.

>"No?//

>rocks and waves."//
>"I’m only putting out ideas." She forced a smile. "Now, rather than telling me what we can't do, why don't you tell me what you think we can do?"//
>"I'm sorry.//
Simple quotation marks.

>barren, grainy, dirt//

You can put commas between adjectives, but you don't put one after the last one in the list.

>against at a fence//

Extraneous word.

>What mattered was that they were heading the wrong way. They wanted to be going into the camp, not away from it.//

If Rarity already knows this, why is she spending so much time describing the fences?

>nearside//

Two words.

>From the way they were held, Rarity guessed they were a weapon//

You use plural "they" but singular "weapon."

>carrying?” She asked//

Capitalization.

>look….//

>I.... see.//
>ah.... any//
One too many dots there.

>see."//

>"So... ah.... any ideas?"//
>"I have one//
>"Let's hear it."//
>"Right. Well, I still have my magic, which none of the guards will suspect. All we need to do is distract them long enough for me to take their casters and overpower them."//
>"You didn't even know//
>"I've practised archery. I can't imagine it'd be that different."//
>"And this distraction? What precisely did you have in mind?"//
Simple quotation marks. Let's just say this continues. I can't keep copying out every instance.

>one of the guard's caster//

Both of those need to be plural: one of the guards' casters.

>ready, scanning the road and ready//

Repetitive.

This paragraph about Rarity shooting the guards is pretty dry. It's not something she's used to, but she doesn't display much emotion about it.

>“Aah…”.//

Extraneous period.

>The one Rarity shot by Rarity//

Jumbled wording.

>the guards’ clothes: a grey jumpsuit//

You're referring to multiple guards but only one jumpsuit.

You'd mentioned that Rarity was noticeably taller than Sparky and Starbound. I'm surprised the suits fit them all equally. How big are the guards in comparison? Not Rarity's size, I presume, since they were surprised to see someone that big.

>warmth—-//

Extraneous hyphen.

>‘un//

Another backward apostrophe. And how can Rarity understand this? Do they speak two languages? She didn't know what the doctor was saying.

>state-”//

Use a dash.

>“Your... faith?” The mare asked.//

Capitalization.

>friggin’-//

Use a dash.

>saliva- drenched//

Extraneous space.

>... you//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>only to again collapsed to the ground//

Jumbled wording.

>"ya reckon we oughta gag her?" The second stallion asked.//

Two capitalization errors.

>Her entire forehead screamed//

You just used "scream" a couple sentences back. You're borderline okay, but you have a fair amount of structural repetition in this paragraph, with so many sentences starting with the subject.

>dry, powdery, dust//

Same as before. Don't put a comma between the last adjective in a list and the thing they modify.

>it’s metallic taint//

Its/it's confusion.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2615

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>looking stallions looked//

Repetitive.

>a wagon half-loaded with steel barrels and few random crates//

Seems like you're missing an "a."

>ya’//

I don't see why the apostrophe is there. You aren't eliminating any letters, just making an imitative spelling.

>Everfree forest//

Both words would be capitalized.

>Mapel//

Typo.

>Rusty gruffed//

>he gruffed//
These occur only 2 paragraphs apart. The more unusual a word, the more it sticks out easily when repeated.

>The auburn stallion seemed to seethe//

Your narration has been decidedly omniscient so far, so I have no idea whose perspective the "seemed" is supposed to represent. It's not a word an omniscient narrator would use, since he knows everything; "seem" wouldn't enter into it.

This other stallion is using direct address far more often that is reasonable. There are only two characters present, so the characters don't need it, and real people just don't do that this often.

>a shity sort of grin on his face.//

Typo, and another spot with an unidentifiable perspective. I mean, it would have to be Rusty's, but the narration sure doesn't sound limited except for those two excerpts where I said otherwise.

>The wagon they were riding//

Normally, you'd say "riding in."

>What few do are scarcely maintained and overgrown with foliage. What very few trails there are have been blazed out of pure necessity.//

Repetitive phrasing.

>so I think it's our best bet//

Set off this dependent clause with a comma.

>‘em//

Whenever you put an apostrophe on the beginning of a word, it's backward. You can paste them in the right way.

I'm having trouble discerning perspective in the second scene. It doesn't sound omniscient anymore, what with subjective statements like :
>who really didn’t seem to be paying much attention//
>somewhat impressive beard//
My best guess is that Rusty holds the perspective, but then why would he bother describing his own color?
>Rusty’s auburn hoof//
And why would he make such an external reference to himself?
>the earth pony chimed//
I still think you're trying to go for an omniscient narrator, but the occasional subjectivity creeps in.

>a little//

You only use this phrase 3 times in the chapter, but they all occur pretty close together.

>hundreds of gallons gasoline//

Seems to be missing an "of."

>similarly-huge//

When you have a two-word phrase starting in an -ly adverb, you don't need a hyphen.

>Clydesdale. At//

Extraneous space.

>Grunting, cursing like a sailor, Rusty dragged himself up onto the wagon and made his body comfortable, leaning back against a crate as he looked over at the unicorn.//

Keep in mind that participles mean things happen at the same time, so you have him leaning back against a crate while dragging himself onto the wagon. They'd more logically happen one after the other.

>manilla//

Typo.

>Rusty gruffed//

That word again. A common example I like to use is that you wouldn't blink at seeing "the" 4 times in a single sentence, but you'd definitely notice seeing "ventriloquist" just twice on an entire page.

>Timber is most notable for it’s ironwood characteristics//

Its/it's confusion.

>approximate time it takes for a single tree to properly mature (approximately//

Repetitive.

>then shared a somewhat horrified look//

For the amount of time Rusty seems to hold the perspective, I can't tell whether you want a limited or omniscient narrator, but if you're going limited, you have Rusty evaluating his own facial expression. While people can perceive certain things about their own faces, they don't do so through appearance, unless they happen to be looking in a mirror, and this is a visual evaluation.

>reasonably-sized//

Doesn't need the hyphen.

>two-thousand//

That's not where hyphens would go in a number.

>signed us up signed up up//

Not sure what happened here.

>like a guilty thief stashing evidence//

Kind of an odd simile to use, since that's exactly what he's doing.

>“So, Crunch,” Rusty gruffed out//

You really like that word.

>Gimme’//

What's the apostrophe there for? You don't have any elided or missing letters.

>gathering around the fire pits, navigating between tents with a lackadaisical precision, humming a little tune to himself all the while. Reaching the closest fire//

This is in a structural rut. You have four participial phrases in a row. There are six total in a paragraph of only three sentences, and every sentence ends in one. The next paragraph gives me a one-sentence break before ending two more sentences with one.

>He had a sharp face, gaunt eye sockets, though his body language and clean appearance really didn’t seem to suggest what his expression foretold about him.//

Seems like that first comma should be an "and." As is, it has an odd cadence to it, like an informal sentence fragment, though your narration hasn't been doing that, so it's odd to spring it now.

>meet Crunch everyone//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Crunch glared at Ratchet, then glanced over to Rusty//

There's a lot of glancing and glaring happening in this scene.

>You ponies don’t like your meats, do you?//

This seems like an odd interjection. It has nothing to do with what's going on, and it goes by with nothing coming of it. It feels more like the author wanting to wedge in that batponies eat meat than something off the cuff that came up in the conversation.

>what appeared to the barrel of a rifle of some sorts//

Why is "sort" plural?

>then glanced down at her tray//

Srsly. I'm maybe 1500 words into the chapter, and this is already the tenth use of "glance."

>Shayne smirked//

And there was a smirk not long ago, too.

>out here. I doubt Celestia’s finest are gonna march out here//

Repetitive phrasing.

>Blazer asked with a sudden, toothy grin//

You just had a "suddenly" in the previous paragraph. It's a good word to avoid anyway. If something's sudden, it should usually come across without your having to say so.

>Shayne threw a leering smirk towards Blazer//

You only have four uses of "smirk" in the chapter, but they're all pretty close to each other.

>miniscule, orange glow//

You only need a comma between adjectives if they're coordinate, which usually means they describe the same aspect of something. A quick but not foolproof test is to see whether they sound reall awkward if you reverse the order. If so, they don't need a comma.

>that nopony seemed to notice//

This is a persistent issue in this chapter. Well, in both of them. The narrator keeps saying subjective things like this and expressing opinions, but it's rare that you have a clear perspective character, so I don't know whose opinions and judgments they are. Whoever it is, he must have been the only one to see this, since the narrator essentially is him.

>voice. “What//

You've got an extra space in there.

Why are you using "Rach" and not "Ratch" as a nickname for Ratchet? It took me a while to realize that's who it was. They're close, but "Rach" could easily have a German pronunciation or similar.

>Ratchet stood and made his way back to his tent near the edge of the clearing//

Once he gets in the tent, he's the only one who could witness the action described. So I'd presume he was supposed to hold the perspective? Except you pop back outside and leave him, so I don't know who the viewpoint character is.

>the mare stood//

And by now, you've taken on Shayne's perspective, and it's one of the few times there actually is a clear perspective, even though the narration sure sounds limited. But that means she'd refer to herself this way, which is strange.

There are obvious problems with repetition and perspective, so those would need to be addressed anyway. In addition, it's going to be tough to get a mature-tagged story accepted. For one thing, we don't like to make people turn off their filters, if they use one, to read something we feature. But mostly it's because a story that requires the tag probably exceeds our content guidelines. So far, I only see one bit of language (the threat Shayne makes about stallions who flirt with her) that's over the line, but we're not even into the part of the story that promises to have the most gore, and without seeing that, I can't make a call on whether it's too much. At the least, take on these mechanical and stylistic things I've detailed and tone down that one phrase, but where material that may violate our content standards is concerned, we'd need to see the actual article to evaluate how bad it gets. On that front, we'd have to wait until you've written that part.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2620

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the Carousel Boutique//

You don't need to put "the" in front of proper names, unless it's officially part of them.

>What brings you out of the castle today my dear?//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>followed now followed//

Extraneous word(s).

>more willing volunteers//

Not clear whether the "more" refers to degree or quantity.

>protégé//

She's female, so protégée.

There's one thing that's already odd about this. You've chosen a very limited narrator, as seen by how the narration directly expresses her thoughts and opinions. Here's an example:
>Granted, she had hoped for more willing volunteers//
That takes a very informal, conversational tone. Honestly, the biggest indicator is the number of times you italicize an isolated word in the narration for emphasis, as that gives it the feel of speech or a thought process. That's all fine.

However, you also have a lot of italicized direct thought, and it's unusual to see that in conjunction with this subjective a narration, since the whole point of that narrative choice is to be able to present the character's thought, impressions, and opinions as narration instead of having to attribute them to the character explicitly. There's nothing technically forbidden about it, but it works against your choice of narrator.

Here are some example I made up to illustrate.
>"What a nice day," she thought.
This could technically be omniscient or limited, but feels more omniscient. It presents the thought as an explicit quote.
>She found it to be a nice day.
This also could be omniscient or limited, but it also feels more omniscient, since it's a statement of fact. That it's a nice day is her opinion, but it's a fact that she holds that opinion, and that's all the sentence is saying. It directly attributes the opinion to her.
>What a nice day!
This has the narrator express the opinion on behalf of the character, and it takes an informal, conversational tone. This is decidedly limited.

So all of that is to say it's a little off-putting to see you use so much quoted thought in a limited narration, because they achieve fairly opposite things about the distance they create between the reader and the character.

I think this spell might need a little more explanation, too. It sounds like it makes it so that any unicorn can cast any spell, and if so, what's the point of magic school? I bet there are other effects in play, like just not having enough magical talent or raw power to cast a particular spell successfully.

>“In your case, the stakes are low, because you don’t yet rely on your magic for everyday functions and the spells that you do use probably won’t be too advanced.”//

This picks right up with dialogue by the same character the previous paragraph ended with. So it's customary to leave the closing quotation marks off the preceding paragraph.

>it—” She levitated four identical journals from her desk towards them. “—in//

When you put a narrative aside in a quote like this, don't capitalize it, unless it starts in something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway, and don't give it end punctuation (a question mark or exclamation mark can be used when appropriate, though).

>This is only a supplement to your innate magic abilities, so you will be able to cast anything that you could before, which is only really limited by the amount of knowledge and training you have.//

Okay, so you're explaining it here. Still, the spell would seem to be a shortcut to magic school, since half of it is gaining mastery. Now all they need to gain is power, since practice would be meaningless.

>focused on the glass. As she focused//

Watch close repetition of words like that.

>~ Snips & Snails ~//

I don't think it's necessary to label the scenes like this. It's immediately apparent which ones are in the scene anyway, so it's pretty redundant.

>“fine.//

Capitalization.

>changed her mind.

>
>That didn’t change//
Again, watch the close repetition.

>The castle’s front doors boom echoed around the castle//

Something doesn't quite parse there.

>who’s castle it was//

Whose. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>*poof*//

Normally, it's a bad idea to put sound effects in narration like this. As this is a comedy, you get some leeway, but it's still poor formatting to use asterisks around it.

>a cold fury the Starlight knew she probably deserved//

Typo.

Okay, you did end up explaining more about how the spell works, so while readers may be as initially confused like I was, it all works out, and it's not such a long story that they have to wait too much.

It was a fairly underwhelming ending, though. Just the fact of Sweetie Belle blowing up a barn isn't that inherently funny, and we don't even see it happen or the CMCs immediate reaction. When they show up at the castle afterward, there's not even much description of them, and Apple Bloom isn't mentioned at all. See, this kind of slapstick humor is sold by how the characters react, and you don't ever supply much of that.

Snips and Snails didn't even do anything, and that's barely made into a joke, either. The colts themselves seem a little disappointed, but the crowd of children doesn't react.

We never see how Dinky reacts to what's going on with her. There's just a calm aftermath. Starlight doesn't react much either. These things are geared toward a lot of physical and visual humor. There's a little higher difficulty with that in a written medium, but it's certainly not insurmountable. Still, to show that physical aspect, we need to see it, and very consistently, the incident's already happened by the time the story gets to describing it, and the characters don't act as if they're witnessing something unnerving or extraordinary. Imagine something completely slapstick or based on visual gags, like Looney Tunes or Spongebob. Then think what it would be like if you never actually saw the funny things happen, and the characters behaved after the fact as if it had been fairly ordinary. It wouldn't be very amusing. That's where all the humor will come from, and that's what this story is missing.

Last thing: the cover art. It really looks like it's a broken "Equestria Girls" genre tag. I had to look at it for several minutes, click on it, and think about it a while before I realized what it was. Another pre-reader had the same experience even when I told him all that. Even if you took it into MS paint and enlarged it 3 or 5 times,that would go a long way toward eliminating confusion. To be honest, though, even some stock screenshot of one or more of the main characters would carry a lot more interest. When cover art is really boring like this, Seth will sometimes pick something else on a whim.

This story is close. It needs that extra oomph to generate laugh-out-loud moments, because it's only mildly amusing right now. Even your parting joke—it's potentially a good one, but we don't see Starlight's reaction or how deadly serious Dinky is. It's lacking the kind of description that makes this type of joke land. If you can get that part down, you'll have something very cute.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2630

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>as he was a batpony who had recently made the move from Canterlot to Ponyville with his mother, forcing him to adjust to an inverted sleeping schedule in order to attend the local school//

This is a pretty lengthy digression, and it's not even that important. You don't want a big speed bump like this right at the beginning. Try to work this stuff in more gradually.

>"Yoo-hoo, you there, Stars?"//

This doesn't make sense with the narrative voice you've chosen. You have the narrator speaking Ebony's thoughts for him, to the point the narrator essentially is Ebony. So if Ebony didn't hear her say these things, the narrator can't, either. Yet he does. It's contradictory.

>everyponies'//

everypony's

>a filly shouted, yanking the young bat-colt//

Again, Ebony himself is essentially the narrator. So you're implying he'd choose to refer to himself as "the young bat-colt," which is strange. People don't think about themselves in such external terms. Plus he knows who this filly is, so it's not reasonable for him to think of her in such external and impersonal terms.

>his slit emerald eyes refocusing on his surrounding//

Surroundings. And why would he remark on his own eye color and the shape of his pupils? To him, they're irrelevant, so why would he mention them?

>dark furred-hoof through his slicked back//

Dark-furred hoof, slicked-back. But again, it feels weird for him to describe his own appearance in detail when it's of no importance to him.

>sorry," Ebony apologized//

That's pretty redundant.

>understanding her meaning//

It's obvious he understands from what he does next. It's not usually a good idea to spell out characters' motivations and realizations so directly.

>Long as she doesn't sell the one's I've been growing, though//

Why is that first apostrophe there?

>Her then expression//

A couple words got swapped.

>His expression calmed and collected//

That's a very external evaluation for him to make of his own expression. But that's not how people typically know how they feel anyway. You know you're sad without looking in the mirror, after all. What ways do you have of telling? These are the kinds of things more applicable to a limited narrator.

>as was her namesake//

You already said as much. This is really awkward.

>Speaking of Begonia, she--if it wasn't obvious by now--was the class bully.//

This really takes on the flavor of addressing the reader and making them an explicit audience, but you haven't established that's what is going on. In fact, that wouldn't even work well with the type of limited narration you're using, as it makes it sound like Ebony is talking to himself here.

>showed that she was trying desperately to hold back her tears from escaping//

Now you're over-explaining it. This was already evident from the physical description. You don't need to short-circuit all that by giving me the conclusion in addition to the evidence.

I can't figure out why they're alternately calling her Cinnamon Bun and Cinnabon. Is the latter a nickname? It's not exactly shorter. It makes it sound like they're two different characters.

>Glad to see that Ebony was consoling Cinnamon Bun//

Unless you phrase this as what Ebony sees, you're going over to Sweet Tooth's perspective.

>Begonia herself, who's left eye was twitching//

Whose. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>knowing look, they slowly took a few steps back, knowing//

Watch the close repetition.

>As Miss Nurture walked back to the playground, she had this sneaking suspicion at the back of her mind that a small foal managed to pull the wool over her eyes.//

Then you spend only two sentences in the teacher's perspective. You stayed in Ebony's for a long time, but lately, it's skipping around.

>A-Alright//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something that has to be capitalized anyway, like a name. Scan through the whole story for this.

>...//

This is not the kind of thing that works well in good writing, to have this be the entirety of a quote or a paragraph. You see it in video games, but they're not exactly known for good writing.

>Hey mom//

Needs a comma for direct address, and family relations get capitalized as terms of address.

>Ebony asked, the bell above the door to his home and mother's flower shop chimed as he entered.//

Comma splice.

>Unhooking his book bag from himself, Ebony walked through the floral-scented showroom, passing his mother and the counter she was behind until he reached a door at the back. Opening it wide, then stepping through it,//

Look how many of these participial phrases you use. Here are four of them in barely more than a single sentence. Authors of intermediate experience tend to lean on them heavily.

>You did get that list filled with the names of every student in your class yesterday, right.//

That's a question, isn't it?

>through his grit teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>The one's I've been growing//

I don't know why you keep putting an apostrophe in that word.

>ok//

It's preferred to spell that out as "okay."

>Ebony pick up//

Verb form.

>with seconds//

That's usually phrased as "within."

>unsure shrug. He faced forward, ensuring//

Odd juxtaposition of "unsure" and "ensuring."

>to catch their breaths//

Just "breath." It's a collective term.

>seventy three//

Hyphenate.

>At Ms. Nurture's queue//

cue

>He was more interested in the more romanticized aspects.//

Repetition of "more," plus this would be a lot more interesting if you gave a couple of examples.

>growing them just outside his room's window sill so they'd be out of sight whenever Cinnamon and Sweet Tooth would be over//

None of them have ever happened to look out the window in 3 years?

>She had also long outgrew her retainer//

outgrown

>recently-earned//

Two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb don't need hyphens.

>Ebony thought it looked nice on her; really helps to bring out her eyes.//

Misused semicolon. If you replaced it with a period, the second part couldn't stand as a complete sentence. You're also mixing tenses here.

>outstretched hoof.

>
>Giving a fake yawn and outstretching//
More repetition.

>subtlety//

subtly

>Ebony, pass this to Cinabon//

She can't spell Cinnabon right? Ironic, since she likes to use the misspelled "sekret," and Ebony doesn't call her out on it.

>lest Cinnamon would begin//

Eh, it's a long explanation. Suffice it to say you shouldn't have that "would."

>baited breath//

bated

>Yes, Ebony was the only one in his class who has yet to get his cutie mark//

Inconsistent tense again. I've seen a few others that I haven't marked.

>Cinnabun//

Now she's got a third name?

>This is Cinnamon Bun's love life, not ours; looking too deeply into this would be prying.//

Somehow, having a kid using a semicolon in an informal note when he's only around the age where he'd first get a cutie mark doesn't come across as realistic.

>not wanting to expose them as well//

Their names are on it. How can he avoid it?

>Ebony could see that his friends were just as fearful as he was//

What's his evidence?

>*BRRRIIINNNGGG*//

There are circumstances where sound effects can work, but typically only in things that are supposed to sound silly or whimsical. Just describe the sound.

>Thankfully, and much to Ebony's relief, that divine interference came in the form of the school bell ringing, signifying that class was over for the day.//

You're really stating the obvious here.

>note that nearly landed him in so much trouble included//

Feels like you're missing a few words before this.

>shrugged amusingly//

You have Ebony describing it as such. So he finds it amusing? I think you meant amusedly.

>unamused//

Pretty repetitive to use that so soon after the "amusingly."

>use to be//

used

>He'd been sitting in his room's desk//

He's in the desk?

>unwind: Get started on his homework.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>the side him and his friends have been ignoring the entire time//

Why'd you switch to present tense?

>try with Cinnamon Bun, so he figured that he might as well try//

Repetition.

>Ebony laid flat against his desk//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight. Instead of "laid," use "lay" here.

>Wanting to hide his embaressed blush//

Bluntly spelling out his emotion and motivation again. Plus a typo.

>force her chortles at bay//

The usual phrasing is to keep something at bay.

>Sweetie//

That's just a generic nickname, not one unique to him. Don't capitalize it.

>their ears perks//

Something got messed up there.

>Hearts and Hooves day//

"Day" is part of the occasion's name, too. Capitalize it. You do this a number of times.

>Ebony couldn't describe how relieved he was to hear that.//

Well, give me something. The limited narrator you're using is uniquely poised to give me comments and images and sensations related to what he's feeling, but you're delivering it rather blandly.

I'm not sure whether the grammatical errors in his poem are intentional. If not, you have its/it's confusion, and the "shined" should be "shone."

>a single joyful tear//

There are few things in this world more cliched.

>...//

You're doing that thing again.

>Watching the scene unfold//

You've spent such a huge majority of the story in Ebony's perspective. Why go over to Cinnamon's now?

>as she might have spotted his tail hanging off the edge//

So why didn't he pull it up? Even if she saw the motion, she has no way of getting up there. It's not like he'd be found out.

>there was two things//

Singular verb with a plural subject.

On the one hand, this is a very common type of story. I've seen lots of them come through here, and if they don't do something to stand out, they're just lost in the crowd. Making the characters OCs hinders you even more in terms of attracting readers, but that's not an issue for me, and at least you've created some interesting characters. Cinnamon Bun is easily the best one. Ebony just comes across as the generic shy one, and it's not until they're passing notes that Sweetie develops that much of a personality, either, so the more you can do to punch them up, the better. That's pretty curious for Ebony, since he's the main character and we spend the most time with him, but aside from him being shy, nothing sticks in my head about who he is.

This isn't a requirement for good writing, but at least it gets you thinking about your characters. A good exercise I've heard of is to come up with 5 words or short phrases to describe your character's personality. Try to have a mix of good and bad things, and it's also good if a couple of them are seemingly contradictory. Make sure your story gets across all 5 at some point, and try to demonstrate at least 3 of them the first time the character appears.

That's not a rigid structure, but anything similar that will immediately create a clear picture in the reader's mind of what Ebony's like will make him well-rounded, realistic, and memorable.

Other than that, the only pervasive things I see are instances of repetition, directly naming character emotion too often, and blips in keeping a consistent perspective, both by saying things that aren't consistent with the chosen perspective and switching around who holds the viewpoint abruptly and for ineffective short bursts. If you could take care of these things, I could see posting it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2631

>next set yourself?” asked Octavia. I nodded my head, then checked the next set//
Watch the repetition.

And since I finally have another reason to pull out the notepad, I'll say that the story is awash in boring "to be" verbs. I'll tally up the easier ones to count when I get to the end, but for now, if you just do a Ctrl-f for "was," watch the screen light up. It'd really be to your benefit to rephrase things with active verbs where you can. They're more interesting, and they give the story a sense of motion.

I might as well wedge this in, too. I suppose you're going to ignore the fact that she talks in the EqG movies? You never hear her, but you can see her talking in the background in "Legends of Everfree" and "Rainbow Rocks."

>gets a bad wrap

rap

>back.” Octavia slipped back//

Close repetition.

>So I can see how she’d be afraid to talk to me.//

She's already said something to this effect a couple times in the paragraph. I get it.

>seriously (She’s//

Don't capitalize there unless you're going to put a period before it. And if you do that, move the preriod at the end inside the parentheses.

It's nice that you're going back through some anecdotal evidence of how their friendship has gone, but it's a little lacking in making an emotional connection, and that's because we don't see Octavia react to any of it. Vinyl says that Octavia felt a certain way about those events, but I'm left with her word as the only evidence. Rather than just say Octavia loved the remix, have Vinyl recall what her reaction was? What did Octavia do? How did she react? You don't have to go so far as to show me these things in full flashback mode, but if it meant that much to Vinyl, a few details would have stuck in her head. Let me relive that with her. And don't forget her own reaction. How did she feel when she saw Octavia enjoying it? What impressions went through her mind, what physical sensations did it cause?

>It's not like anyone knew I was gay. Part of not being able to talk, I guess.//

Really? It's not like what a person says is the best evidence of that.

>god//

You'd capitalized that earlier.

I've seen people link music for atmoshpere. I haven't seen people link something that you actually had to click on to understand the story. All I can say is it's bad enough to encourage people to click away from your story, and it must be worse to require it. And then you Rickroll the reader. I hope you know a lot of them are going to feel trolled. Some may quit reading right there.

It's probably not appropriate to italicize "Liebe," just based on your description of how long it is. Something that short is generally going to go in quotation marks, though the nature of classical music can throw things into a gray area.

>must've came//

come

Well, your closing line's effectiveness is going to hinge on the reader knowing a bit of German. The thing is, it doesn't even really express the story's theme. Neither one of them was going to throw away anything about their relationship. Vinyl was considering not acting on it, but that's not the same as throwing it away.

You're also making this difficult, because this is how approximately 75% of shipping stories play out. Person A confesses a long-held crush to person B, who either a) reveals they've actually felt the same way for a long time or b) immediately develops reciprocal (yeah, I had to work in the math term) feelings. At least you have Octavia unsure about it, but that's a variation on a theme (yeah, I'm going to work in musical terminology, too) and one that's not particularly rare in its own right, and you still have Octavia as a quick conversion. There's "hey, let's give it a try," and then there's "let's kiss, hey, we're dating now!" This story's more about cautious optimism, and it doesn't need to see that potential come to fruition to make its point. In short, you're going to have thematic closure anyway, so you might consider not having plot closure, i.e., having a bit of an open ending. That's your call, though.

Anyway, I said I'd count up the "to be" verbs, at least the ones that are unambiguous enough to do a search on. You have 72, and the big one is "be," with 26 instances, oddly enough. Usually, "was" or "is" make up the majority depending on the prevailing tense. That rate's actuallt not bad at all. 72 uses in 3870 words isn't even once every third sentence. The issue here is more where they occur. They tend to clump up so they feel locally repetitive, and one of those clumps occurred at the beginning of the story, which is precisely the wrong time to make things feel stagnant.

By the way, I'm not sure where Vinyl comes up with Octavia having some great popularity. The movies certainly never paint her as such, though it's the kind of thing that's not hard to accept without there being a cascade of other changes to canon required. I'm just wondering if it's actually the case, or if that's just Vinyl's perception of her. It might help if you had other students interacting with them at some point, or maybe related through one of Vinyl's anecdotes, to illustrate.

Really, the only thing making this rise above the sea of other shipping fics out there, TaviScratch ones in particular, is the good character work here. They're both vibrant, memorable, and likable. But the more you can do to distinguish your story from the thousands of others out there can only help. You're probably very locked into the way they establish their relationship by now, so I guess it's more in the details to distance yourself from the crowd little by little.

So to achieve that, I'd recommend having a stronger finish that doesn't make a fairly tangential point, going for a richer immersion in the anecdotal material Vinyl provides to show her history with Octavia, and keeping your verb choice more consistently active.

This is close enough that you can mark it as "back from Mars" when you're ready to resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2632

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>your first time sitting at home waiting while somepony else goes and has the dangerous adventure//

This isn't the case, though. because you picked Twilight and Fluttershy, you've matched canon. I can only assume you did that on purpose. In that case, the first time Dash got left behind was when Rarity and Applejack went to Manehattan. I was thinking that if you didn't want to match that, you could pick a pairing canon didn't, but then that'd place this even later than S6, so it'd be at least the fifth time Dash got left behind if you did that. I'll see if it ends up mattering whether this'd be the first or second time, but I think it'd be a good idea to tweak things a bit to fit that.

>The Smokey Mountains//

Ah, so you are adhering to canon. This does mean this is Dash's second time being left behind, not the first.

>Whoah//

Why can't anyone spell this right?

>The manticore was pushed forwards//

>A model representing a flock of black birds was pushed down//
Pretty repetitive phrasing so close together.

>Shining Armour//

Look, I don't mind people using British spellings for the most part. But this isn't his name.

>“Looks like the map’s still doin’ its thing. Don't that mean they're still workin’ on it?”//

You've got a mix of simple and fancy style quotations marks and apostrophes. I assume you directly edited on FiMFiction to produce the simple ones. Or maybe you want all quotes to be fancy and all apostrophes to be simple. I've seen writers do that before, but even the apostrophes are inconsistent here. And I doubt this'll be the only place in the story this happens. I won't mark any more, so scan for them.

>Without warning, her bedroom was invaded by a flock of birds, big and small, sleek and fluffy, fast and darting and fat and languorous and erratic and colourful and above all, loud!//

I was going to praise your ability to stick to an omniscient narration, which is a lot harder than most people think. But this statement is decidedly limited. It's expressing an emotion through the phrasing (somewhat) and the exclamation mark (particularly). This creates a conversational style and essentially has the narrator convey Dash's feeling on the matter as his own. If you just lost the exclamation mark, it'd at least get it back into a gray area (it's still debatable whether all those other words like loud, fat, and languorous constitute a narrative opinion).

>Oh, sweet Celestia, Fluttershy could be really hard work sometimes.//

And here, you definitely have the narrator speaking Dash's thoughts for her. This is irrevocably limited narration. Since the vast majority of the time, your narration sounds omniscient, I have to assume that's what you want. If so, then you need to take care to attribute any subjective parts of the narration to the characters explicitly. You could do that here by making this line a quoted thought.

>This was going to be a long one.//

Same deal. This is unquestionably Dash's thought presented as narration, which is fine for a limited narrator, but not an omniscient one.

>We go home, and let Pinkie throw a party.//

You don't need a comma there, since the same subject is linked to both verbs.

>chivvy//

Is that a Britishism? I've never heard it before.

>on the things she said…//

Trailing off is like your previous exclamation, in that it adds a conversational tone that doesn't work with an omniscient narrator. The same would go for the narration getting interrupted, cut off, or asking a question.

It's preferred to leave a space after your ellipses, unless they start a sentence. Otherwise, it can format funny at times, since you can't control the way FiMFiction does its typesetting.

>Silence.//

Limited feel again. Omniscient narration should be more or less formal and stick to facts. Since I'm seeing more of this as I get further into the story, I guess I could see this being intentional, where the story shifts from omniscient to limited as it goes? Except I can't imagine what effect that would be intended to create. I can't think of a thematic reason to do so, and it's not following some realization on Dash's part.

>surprisingly//

The narrator's expressing an opinion again.

>It did all look a bit amateurish. She'd probably have to chastise somepony about that later.//

Limited feel again.

>Woah//

Please, please, please don't be one of those authors who can't spell this.

>That drab earth pony that's always playing on the arcades//

For a sentient being, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>with obvious distaste//

Another narrative opinion. Obvious to whom? Not me, since I don't get to see the evidence of it. This is Dash's judgment expressed as narration.

>Rainbow was lapping it up.//

This is factual, so it could be omniscient, but it's an oddly external judgment for Dash to make, so if you did want this to be limited, it sounds more like a comment from Rarity's viewpoint.

>Dash!” exclaimed Rarity, “I don't//

You need a period after "Rarity." Your pattern of capitalization and punctuation makes the entire quote a single sentence, yet you've put end punctuation in the middle of it.

>looked honestly surprised//

There are a few spots in the story where you bluntly tell me how a character feels, and I haven't been getting bent out of shape about it, since it's infrequent. But this lacks punch when I have to rely on the narrator's judgment without being able to draw my own conclusion. Describe what she looks like in a way that I'll deduce surprise on my own.

These two are using direct address more than feels natural. It's not like they need that cue to know when they're being spoken to. In a one-on-one conversation like this, people only use it for emphasis. Consider how often you actually do so when talking with a single friend.

>Rainbow murmured an indecipherable acknowledgement.//

Narrative impression again. An omniscient narrator, by definition, couldn't find anything indecipherable. It's Rarity who finds it such, so say that. Even if you did intend a limited narration, all the indicators are that Dash is the perspective character, the few times it comes up, but Dash wouldn't find her own murmur indecipherable, so this would have to be Rarity's opinion. Thus even in that case, there's a needless shift of perspective.

>I’m sure Twilight would have welcomed the company.//

Maybe Rarity and Dash hadn't noticed, but Twilight had been desperate to go along on one of the missions, but she restrained herself because she firmly believed only those explicitly summoned by the map could go. So no, I don't believe Twilight would have welcomed the company. I think she would have said the map clearly didn't want them to have company.

>the frantically flapping pegasus//

I'll wrap it up at the end, but in the case you wanted a limited narrator, this kind of descriptor rarely works, because it implies the perspective character would choose to refer to Dash this way in her own thoughts. People just don't do that for others they know, so it would be odd for Rarity to think of Dash in these terms instead of just a name or pronoun, and even stranger for Dash to describe herself that way. But if you want an omniscient narrator, these can work, as long as you use them in moderation.

>Yup, here it was.//

Subjective narration.

>she said smugly//

And even if you want limited narration, it's awfully self-aware of Dash to admit she's smug.

>in exasperation//

It's really a good idea to avoid these "in/with/of mood" phrasings. For one, they do nothing to paint a picture; instead they make me paint the picture. For another, they're often redundant with emotional cues already in the sentence.

>mud-pony backwater//

I can buy that he doesn't know this, but even though it was founded by earth ponies, it's notable for being a place where all the races live together. This point was made in "Flight to the Finish."

>Okay, so much for lying.//

Limited narrative feel again.

>Taking a deep breath//

>Squinting at the western horizon//
>Kneeling down//
You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>less qualified//

Hyphenate.

>Unless they were in any kind of danger, of course.//

Sentence fragments are another conversational affectation that indicates limited narration.

>But if she happened to walk past a telescope, and catch a glimpse of them in the distance, nopony could blame her for that, right?//

You don't need that first comma, and asking a question makes this a limited narration.

>She turned one of the dials that made it blurry; then tried the other way until they came into focus.//

If a semicolon is properly used, you should be able to replace it with a period, but that would leave the second part as a sentence fragment.

>Well, they were safe at least. She didn't need to go flying off to save them or anything.//

Limited narration again. Actually, the rest of the story from here is mostly limited.

Maybe I just missed something, but I think the story failed to make a point on something. Or maybe it presented its own theme's counterargument, which is odd. You make a whole scene that Fluttershy moved away from home and left Dash behind. Fluttershy hadn't even mentioned it to Dash, so it's not like it just slipped her mind and she was surprised to find out it had happened already. She had no idea about it. So Fluttershy was fine going off on her own. I can't imagine why she'd have kept it secret, though it doesn't seem malicious, since Fluttershy wasn't displeased to find out Dash had followed. I was kind of expecting Dash to make a realization about this. Maybe she'd finally take offense to being the one left behind, and that Fluttershy was doing it again. Or maybe she'd tie that back in and realize Fluttershy had already been able to handle herself before. As it is, I can't tell what you want it to mean. It's there, and it never gets folded back in to the theme again. It's fine as a piece of back story, but it's just begging to be a thematic element.

Watch the few times you directly inform the reader of character emotion. It was infrequent enough that it wasn't a big deal, but it can rob the story of some impact when you do so at an important moment, where you really want the reader empathizing with the character.

The only big issue for me was the way the narration couldn't settle into a single voice. I said I'd revisit that, so here it is. It's pretty far into the story before there's any limited character to the narration, but after that point, it wavers back and forth. It would feel like a much more coherent story if that was made consistent. I can't tell which you intended, so I'll lay out how both work.

If you want an omniscient narrator, then have the narration deal in facts and use a fairly formal tone. It is a fact that Rainbow Dash feels unhappy or that she stomps a hoof. It is an opinion that Fluttershy needs this mission to gain confidence. When the narration says something involving a judgment call, it needs to say whose judgment that is by directly attributing it. So sift through your narration, and either remove/rephrase things that state a matter of opinion or take on a conversational tone, or say outright which character has those impressions.

If you want a limited narration, then it's fine to have the narrator speak on the character's behalf, essentially representing that character's stream of thought. It can take on conversational tone, if you like, asking questions, shouting, emphasizing words, getting interrupted, trailing off. It sounds very much like dialogue at times. Just be careful that it presents that character's perception accurately. One example I use frequently is that if Rarity is your focus character, and she sees Dash blush, she can say Dash's face is red. If Rarity's the one blushing, she can't see her own face, so her perception of it is different. She might notice her cheeks warming, for instance. Also be careful that you stay with one character at a time. Don't flip back and forth between multiple viewpoints rapidly. It's best to stay with a single one for an entire scene, if you can. It's possible to shift perspective within a scene, but it takes some skill to execute, and I won't go into all that, since it doesn't seem like you'd need to in this story.

Getting back on track, this story spends so much time sounding omniscient that that's the overall feel it takes. So if your intention was to have a limited narrator, you need to chime in far more often with some kind of opinion or conversational affectation to keep reminding the reader of it. Once every few paragraphs at least usually does the trick. And you need to establish that tone right from the first paragraph.

This is a nice character piece. It just needs a more consistent perspective, so iron out what you want that to be, bring it in line with that, and I'd be happy to post it. When you're ready, you can mark it as "back from Mars," since I wouldn't need to take a detailed look at it again.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2634

>All so perfect, or it would have been.//
I pointed this out last time, but later on, so you might not have noticed it was a direct excerpt. This is Spike's thought, but it's presented as narration. Thus, Spike's effectively the narrator. That's fine. Then we have this:
>the adolescent dragon snorted//
If the narrator is speaking for Spike in the first one, then he still has to be in the second. So Spike is calling himself "the adolescent dragon." That's just weird. People don't think of themselves in such distant, external terms.

>All he did was watch empty as the fire evaporated into the air.//

Not sure about that phrasing. Are you missing some words?

>Yet, once again life was making that difficult//

No reason to have a comma there. In general, they don't belong after conjunctions.

>She was the most beautiful, stunning, magnificent mare he's ever seen//

Why are you switching from past to present tense?

>The dragon gave a disgruntled snort as that idea crossed the dragon's mind//

Repetitive use of "the dragon," but again, that's a really odd way for him to choose to describe himself.

You've still got an awful lot of "to be" verbs early on. In just the first two screens, I counted 35 of them. In the three paragraphs starting here:
>If only Rarity were here as he'd planned.//
you have 8 instances of "been" alone. It could really use some more active verb choice.

>the smouldering embers of his frustration scatting//

So he's singing? Or pooping... I don't think that's the word you wanted.

>He knew Twilight won't mind if he was gone for a night, one of the perks about being a dragon that he actually enjoyed was the fact nothing ever messed with him.//

That comma's a splice, and you're shifting tense again.

>and the dragon's head perked up//

He's referring to himself very externally again.

>his sad frown disappearing//

There's two problems with this. First, you should avoid naming emotion directly, where possible. Don't tell me it's a sad frown. Demonstrate sadness. How do you know a stranger on the street is sad? You have to pick up cues from how he looks and acts. Give me the same kinds of cues from him. And second, this makes a visual evaluation of his face, but remember he's effectively the narrator. He can't see his face.

>sorry for sneaking up on you." Came the soft voice//

Punctuation/Capitalization of dialogue/tag.

>complete bewilderment in his tone//

Put yourself in his place, since the narration is supposed to represent his experiences. You don't notice you're bewildered from hearing your tone of voice. You'd already know it internally from how you feel, and that feeling manifests itself as a mental state and possibly physical sensations. The mental state can come across through what the narrator says, but more important is how he says it. It won't sound much different from dialogue. You can give the narration a conversational feel. Maybe he has a few false starts before he can get started, maybe the narrator asks a question. You have to get at his mood through the feel of the narration, not by just summing it up in a word that isn't going to draw me into his mindset.

>the dragon's surprise//

I'm not going to keep marking these, but this type of external reference doesn't work with your choice of narrator. He's not going to describe himself with language like this, and he probably wouldn't do so for friends or acquaintances either. Please give your story a scan for these.

>tentatively//

See, this does nothing to create a picture of her. Make her look and act tentative. How does she walk? What kind of expression does she have? And don't say a tentative expression. Describe it without using emotion or mood words. Think about what she's doing with her eyes, ears, mouth, whatever. You're trying to give me a picture of her in my head that I'll conclude tentativeness from.

>the mare//

He knows her well. Why would he describe her in such generic terms? You don't think about your friends like this.

>Spike raised a barbed eye crest//

Why would he mention his own eye being barbed here? It's irrelevant. It's also something he'd be so used to that it wouldn't even occur to him. If someone else held the perspective, they might notice this detail, but he wouldn't. If you come in from the rain, and you run your hand over your head, what would you more reasonably think, "my hair's wet" or "my brown hair's wet" (assuming you have brown hair, of course)? That's the kind of obtrusively irrelevant thing you're trying to wedge in here. For that matter, I'll illustrate one of those descriptors. Would you think "my hair's wet" or "the fanfiction author's hair is wet"?

>half genuinely curious and half slightly concerned//

You're really spelling out his emotion again. The name of the game is to get me to conclude this, not just tell me outright.

>Spike shrank back slightly at the look, not only did it remind him so much of Sweetie's older sister//

Comma splice.

>Neither did I Spike,//

When direct address is in the middle of a sentence, it takes commas on both sides.

>giggling slightly as she bowed his head//

I think you meant that "she" to be a "he."

>Despite that, the dragon sighed in belief//

Typo.

>All the request//

I assume you meant that to be plural.

>The world is a big place, at least you know you'll get to see it//

Comma splice.

Just note that I'm not at all being exhaustive. I marked a comma splice on your last submission as an example so you could look through and find any more on your own, but you didn't catch any more. So I'm marking a few more examples this time, but I'm not getting the all, or I'd be spending far too long on this. The point is for you to learn to find them yourself, and not just comma splices—all these things I'm pointing out.

>from?" she asked, and at Spike’s blush she added. "Sorry//

As phrased, that period should be a comma, but you really need to split this into two sentences. I'd recommend getting rid of the "and" and starting a new sentence there.

>studding each sharp claw//

Typo.

>You're not domestic Spike.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>as magnificent as the sun set//

sunset

>Spike looked at her, his expression more akin to that of a timid puppy than a large dragon.//

How does he even know what his expression looks like? This doesn't work for his perspective. And you're using "seem" a lot around here.

>"How do you know that?"//

This is double indented, and there's no blank line after this paragraph.

>Come on Spike,//

Needs another comma for the direct address.

>just sympathy//

Repetitive with the "sympathetically" you used just a few sentences ago.

>heart breaking//

heartbreaking
Missing apostrophe.

>while he'd admitted love rarity for her looks//

Capitalization, missing words.

>that Sweetie seemed to bare//

What's she baring? She's not wearing anything.

>Spikes mind//


>At dragon's stare//

Missing word. I gather this is new material, but please give it some editing attention.

>shied away slightly. It was only then that Spike realised how he must look and fumbled for words as he shied away//

Repetition.

>tick scales//

So he's an arachnid now?

>I... I//

Extraneous space.

>far kinder and loyal than most ponies//

Missing word.

>He may never win the heart of the pony he loved//

So he's pretty much admitting he doesn't love Sweetie Belle, right when we're supposed to start believing he does?

>made him realised that//

Verb form.

>he eared to see//

I don't know what that was supposed to be.

>to brake free//

Typo. And you're using "admire" quite a bit around here.

>and he shied away//

More shying away, huh?

>the sun set sky//

sunset

>sky sky//

Repeated word.

>life’s twist and turns//

Mixing singular and plural there.

So you did add some transition to get Spike on board with someone who has to travel a lot, instead of just having him make a snap decision to leave home with her. There are still some editing and perspective issues, though, and there's still not much here about what attracts them to each other.

Since this isn't a romance that's a slow burn, it's not like you can follow them from first meeting to first kiss and tell the whole story. But you've got this perspective from within Spike's head, so why not use that to your advantage? When he's realizing he does have feelings for her, what memories does that evoke? Working through anecdote can be very effective for situations like this. They've spent time together in the past. How does he see those memories in a new light? Relate a couple to me. He might recall a couple of instances where he found her endearing, but it hadn't really registered. Or with the benefit of hindsight, maybe he can see now that there were signs of her attraction he'd been overlooking for years. That's a good way of demonstrating that they care for each other. Now, all I'm getting are some pretty generic statements. Specific is always better. A few examples will speak far louder than a sweeping generality. They can even reminisce together.

It's improving, but it still needs something to stand out above all the other similar shipping stories that use pretty much the same premise, but that don't really demonstrate the romance so much as ask the reader to accept it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2644

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>a strength that she had not known for centuries but never forgotten//

That's a really odd branching point for a parallel structure. It comes across as awkwardly phrased, since it makes it feel like the verb forms don't match, and the "not" is linked so closely with the "had."

>An eerie hush fell over the crowd//

You're using a limited narrator in Adagio's perspective, so you're implying the phrasings are ones she would choose. Why would she call this eerie, though? It might to an outside observer, but she should be used to how this goes. I don't see why she'd find it eerie.

>She turned her baleful crimson eyes//

That's another oddity of perspective. Why would she need to mention her own eye color?

>once resplendent//

You're using the shole phrase as a single modifier, and it precedes what it describes, so hyphenate it.

>They stood in a circle, each one holding the shattered remnants of their once-magnificent pendants.//

But in the movie, they left the pieces on the stage...

>Adagio grit her teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>agonizing silence tinged with palpable despair//

Let the narration carry this. You're using a limited narrator, and that's one of its strengths. What kinds of thoughts might run through your head in her situation? Have the narrator say something like that. The narration is telling me she feels this way, but it sounds very calm. When you have a limited narrator, let them run in parallel.

>look of desperation//

Watch the close repetition. You just used "look" earlier in the same sentence and "despair" 3 sentences back. More than that, though, you should try to avoid directl naming emotions like this. Demonstrate it. Describe her face and behavior in such a way that I'll read despair from it instead of you having to tell me so.

>hating how her voice cracked and wavered//

This is a fine point, but one that can make your writing a lot richer. Since you've chosen a limited narrator, have the narration express her hate. Don't just say she hates this; have her berate herself for her weakness and her failure in the narration.

>brooding and grim rather than despondent//

I'm not going to keep marking this, but look for opportunities to demonstrate emotions instead of simply naming them for the reader. Like anything else, I'll point out a few examples of this, then have you go through the rest of the story on your own to tweak further instances.

>sounds of her sister's footsteps//

There's more than one sister there, right?

>She lingered just long enough//

More repetition. She just lingered a few paragraphs back.

>The second she laid down//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight. Lay/laid/had laid takes a direct object, so she laid her head down. Lie/lay/had lain doesn't take a direct object, so she lay down.

>finally began to close, but another hour until she finally//

Repetition.

>“Sit down,” Adagio said, carefully coaxing Sonata to sit on the bed.

This is a common issue with Dazzlings stories. Adagio was very authoritative and pretty abusive in the movie, and this is later the same day. What's made her so quickly change her attitude? I mean, I know it has to do with being defeated, but it's just suddenly there. We don't get to see the change or watch Adagio navigate it. One minute, she's mean to them, and the next, she's concerned about them. This could use a little more gradual change.

>hating the doubt she heard in her own voice//

And that's a really similar phrasing to one you used earlier.

>"Rest. We’ll talk in the morning.”//

Throughout the story, you've got a mix of simple and fancy style quotation marks and apostrophes like this. Make them consistent.

>She wished that there was something she could say, but to her eyes the night was so bleak that there were no words to say that could make it bearable.//

Another spot where demonstrating it instead of spelling out her motivation and wishes explicitly would be more powerful.

I do feel like I'm not getting much of a picture of where they are. You have a few perfunctory statements of setting, but it could use more detail. In particular, think about what things in their home could have some kind of symbolic or thematic meaning, both in what you choose to describe and how. That kind of thing adds lots of atmosphere.

>She laid in place for a minute or two//

Lay/lie confusion again.

You're using some pretty fancy language in Sonata's limited narration, which is in contrast to how Adagio thought of her in the first chapter. You do need to match personality and intelligence level of a limited narrator to the character it represents, so there's a contradiction here, but maybe an intentional one? Adagio might not realize how smart Sonata actually is. We'll see how this plays out.

>with suspicion//

Particularly try to avoid these "in/with/of mood" phrasings, as they're almost always redundant with material already there.

There, now in chapter two, we're getting a lot more setting. It's from a different character, though, so it would have helped to characterize Adagio in the last chapter to get this kind of thing from her.

>In her weary, half-asleep state, more than one word at a time was simply asking too much.//

Except her limited narration sounds very aware and coherent. Match her condition to how her limited narration says things.

>Momentarily hopeful, she lifted her hand to her neck, feeling for a gem that she knew to be absent. For just a moment, she hoped//

Repetitive, but also, it feels rather external to her to describe herself as "momentarily hopeful," since it's a pretty stoic assessment of her mood. It doesn't sound hopeful.

>Once out in the hall, a pleasant scent drifted lazily through the air.//

This makes it sound like the scent has moved into the hall, not Sonata.

>but both of them barely felt like eating//

How does Sonata know this? She's your limited narrator in this scene, and she could know that for herself, but you essentially have her reading Adagio's mind, unless you say how she came to that conclusion or that it's just her opinion.

>taking one last bite before standing up without a word, taking//

Repetition. Also note that participles make actions simultaneous, whereas these would occur one after the other. Keep this in mind when you use them. There are plenty of other examples in the story where the timeline doesn't quite make sense.

>hoping//

You're telling me what characters hope an awful lot. This falls in a class of verbs that should be avoided in limited narration, related to perception or knowledge. The focus character and narrator are linked, essentially the same, so they have the same experience of things. If the narrator describes something, it's implicit the character can see it, so you don't need to say she sees it. That covers sensory verbs. Others are things like wish, want, hope, wonder, think, and know. It's a little indirect to say she hopes something. There's an extra step between the reader and narrator. Have the narrator express the hope directly. Something like "maybe she wouldn't have to wait very long." That conveys a sense of hope without ever having to use the word, and it's a much more intimate expression than being informed of it as a fact.

>Sonata set the notebook aside and laid down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Sonata opened one eye and glanced to the side. There was a blurry shape standing over her. It sounded like Aria and looked vaguely purple and belligerent in a sort of Aria-like kind of way, but it was hard to be certain.//

See, this sounds very much like Sonata. Maybe except for the "belligerent," though that's not such an advanced word. But compare to what you had early in the chapter that was fairly dry and lacking her personality, and was also using far more fancy words that you do here. This captures her voice much better.

>up and then looked up//

Close repetition.

>Sonata shook her head and clambered to her feet, dusting herself off before looking at Aria, concerned.//

First, the proximity suggests Aria's the one who's concerned, but I bet you mean Sonata. Second, it's very blunt for Sonata to say she's concerned and leave it as a one-word description. Voice some of her concerns. What bad scenarios does she imagine playing out? How does that make her feel physically?

>Starting that day//

Compared to the first sentence of the scene, this is repetitive and a bit confusing as to the time frame.

>No response.//

The beginning of this chapter is quite repetitive. You have two paragraphs start with this sentence, then shortly after, you have two more repetitive sentence openers:
>When she heard nothing//
>When no response came//
Those last two probably just need to be rephrased. The first two can work, though. If you want repetition to create an effect, there's a finesse to it. Basically, you need to make it obvious the repetition is intentional by drawing attention to it. The simplest way, and the one I think would be fine here, is to use words that acknowledge the repetition. So if you make the second one something like "Still no response," then it accomplishes something with the repetition, an the reader's not going to interpret it as a potential mistake.

>If- if//

Hyphens aren't for stutters, false starts, interruptions, or cutoffs. Please use a proper dash. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>She wondered if Adagio had ever been there, or if she had just been knocking on an empty room and fooling herself into thinking that someone was still inside.//

There's another one of those verbs that doesn't need to be in a limited narration. Have the narrator wonder it directly instead of telling me Sonata wondered it.

>Rather, it felt like being wrapped in a wall of stone. In Aria’s arms, Sonata felt, above all else, safe, and that brought with it a little bit of comfort.//

This is pretty stiff imagery. Make it more abstract. What sort of mental image might a concept like "safe" bring? Use something like simile or metaphor to bring this alive. That's what gets the reader caught up in it.

>a familiar gesture of affection//

So make it seem familiar to me too. When has Aria done this before? If it's familiar, it'd draw a memory.

>'till//

That spelling doesn't use an apostrophe.

>thoughts of what was to come afterwards filled her with dread//

This is too vague to mean anything. Give me a couple examples of what she envisions and how she reacts to them.

>the thought of seeing those that she wronged so severely//

Fairly repetitive phrasing so soon after the one I pulled out for my previous comment.

>she imagined a new form of punishment that they might inflict on her//

She's heard Sonata crying, though. I'd like to see her try to reconcile this. In her state, she's not necessarily going to be very logical, but she's not just going to ignore evidence, either. If she really feels like they want to punish her, she's probably got some rationalization of how Sonata crying or Aria not yelling at her through the door makes sense.

>so as not to infuriate her with its scandalously lackluster boxiness//

Where's this coming from? She's never expressed any such aesthetic sense before, and frankly, this is so over the top that it feels like it's trying to be comedic.

>There had been days when she poured over it for hours on end//

pored

>once vibrant//

Hyphenate.

>together on the couch and watched television together//

Repetition.

>lamentations//

That's a really odd word choice. Are you sure this is what you really mean?

>"Well..." Sonata trailed off//

You don't need to narrate trailing off when it's already evident from the punctuation. The same goes for getting interrupted or cut off.

>confiding to Aria//

I've always heard that phrased as confiding in.

>know- I don't know-//

Please use dashes.

>know-” Sonata cut herself off//

Heh. I guess I predicted that. This is redundant.

>mixed expressions of confusion and dread//

Let me see.

>once in awhile//

"A while" actually needs to be two words here, so there's a noun to serve as the preposition's object.

>“... she//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis.

>“Sonata-”//

Use a dash.

This conversation uses more direct address than feels natural. When you're talking one on one with a friend, how often do you actually do this? Mostly just when you want to emphasize something.

>‘cause//

If you're going to use the fancy quote, pay attention to leading apostrophes. Smart quotes get them backward, since they assume you want a single opening quotation mark. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row, then delete the first. Probably all your leading apostrophes are like this. I do see others.

>trying!//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, and there's a question mark or exclamation mark on it, include the punctuation in the italics.

I'll jump in with something you mentioned in the comments. I don't think the perspective jumps around too much. You stay with a single one through each scene, and scene breaks are a fine time to change viewpoint. You can do so in the middle of a scene, too, but there's much more of an art to doing that well. You've actually done a good job of keeping to one perspective per scene. You'd be surprised how many authors have a lot of trouble with that. You've also done a good job of clearly indicating who holds the perspective right as each scene starts so the reader immediately knows whose eyes they're seeing through, instead of having to flounder along, assuming it's the same perspective as the previous scene, until he finally does see an indication and has to reinterpret the scene so far.

>Compared to her sisters, Aria’s room//

But you're comparing rooms, not sisters...

>laid several items: A blank sheet of paper//

Lay/lie confusion, and only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>then set the paper in front of her. Then//

Repetitive.

>Then, she stretched her arm out//

And again in the same paragraph. You also don't need to follow "then" with a comma.

>thunk//

Just leave that in normal font. It's a valid word. When you get too cutesy with the sound effects, it tends to make the story feel like a comedy or something intended for a young audience.

>She picked one of them up and held it before her scrutinizing eye.//

>She picked up a splinter of her gem again, holding it up to her scrutinizing eye.//
Really repetitive phrasing. The "again" justifies the repeated action, but what comes after it isn't achieving anything with the repetition.

>Aria turned her spiteful eyes//

Why would she describe her own eyes that way? That's more something another character or an omniscient narrator would observe.

>Then, she picked up her abacus and stood up.//

You have a fair amount of these "then" actions in this chapter, plus you keep putting a comma after it, but only when it starts a sentence.

>Moving over to her mattress, she flopped down//

Another spot where a participle synchronizes actions that probably shouldn't be.

>directions Aria had given her. They had directed//

Repetitive.

>Dumb dumbfaced dummy Aria. Stupid grumpy little… stupid person.//

Note how different this sounds from a lot of the narration, yet they're both supposed to be the same person's voice. You get some leeway, as reading narration that's constantly this childish would get grating, but the tone of the narration could stand to sound a little more like her in places. What comes shortly after this is quite good, though.

>Sonata’s eyes lit up with excitement.//

Watch directly naming the emotion, and it's a rather external assessment for her to make about herself.

>bacon girl//

She used that before when she was having trouble remembering Sunset's name, but she's used it by now, so... I have mixed feelings. It's comic, but it feels a bit deliberate.

>She wanted to be look sympathetic.//

Something went wrong there.

Man, it'd be funny if she went through all this and Sunset wasn't home. Even more if Sunset's been watching her from the street the whole time.

>sniffle a little//

>mussed up her hair a little//
Repetitive so close together.

>in concern//

Okay, there are a few things I've been marking most of the examples I see, but it's time for me to hand over the reins to you. Try to avoid naming emotions outright, particularly with this type of phrasing. I'm going to leave the rest of a lot of these points for you to detect.

>C- can//

Don't put spaces after the hyphens in a stutter.

>“I…” She trailed off//

Redundant.

>Sunset directed Sonata to a pair of couches//

Kind of repetitive after you'd just mentioned a couch.

>Sunset’s expression became heavy with concern.//

There's a lot of concern in this chapter.

>squealing with excitement//

By proximity, this seems to describe Sunset. It's also the second "excitement" in the sentence.

>like,//

I could see putting a comma on both sides of this, but not just one. Or you could go without any.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2645

>>2644
>And so Sonata babbled on//
Odd for her to characterize her own conversation that way.

>many furnishing//

Typo.

Wow, this story shares a lot in common with another I read recently. Sonata helping the Dazzlings, an Adagio feeling like a failure, nautical themes. An interesting case of convergent evolution, as this was published first, and I know the author hadn't read this.

>Sonata, prattled on//

Not sure why that comma is there.

>How cool is that?//

Include the question mark in th italics.

>Ignoring Sonata’s protesting, panicked look//

You'd been in Sonata's perspective, but this feels very external to her.

>that left a pungent odor of alcohol in Sunset’s nostrils//

So... are you going into Sunset's perspective now? As stated, she's the only one who could know this.

>but failed to completely mask her unease//

How so? Let me see it.

>she winced//

Capitalization. It looks like a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>hand-written//

handwritten

I'm getting severe mood whiplash here. Last time we saw Adagio, she was browbeating herself as a failure, and now she's very much self-assured and domineering with no transition. It's one thing to have her outwardly so, but we're in her perspective now, so we see the internal, too, and it's doing the same thing.

>You’ve avoided them for awhile now.//

"A while" needs to be two words in this instance.

>I think you’re hurting a lot more than you let on. Sonata sure thinks you are, I think.//

That's an awful lot of thinking.

>giving a haughty toss of her hair//

She just did exactly that about a page ago.

>somehow, that she meant no harm. No words were spoken, and yet Sunset somehow//

Repetition.

>just a, expression that it was alright to be a little vulnerable//

Pretty vague, plus a typo.

>she laid still//

Lay/lie confusion.

>reigned in her feelings//

Actually, quite the opposite. Anyway, you want "reined."

>voice falling to a whisper//

Last time you described her tone, it was a whisper, and nothing's happened in the interim to change that, so... her voice is falling to a whisper again?

>Starswirl//

Canon is Star Swirl.

>with a savage snarl//

She just snarled two paragraphs ago.

>yet still//

Redundant.

>I will make her pay.//

Yeah, she's not really having an emotional arc I can follow here. She's a failure early in the story, an she stays sobbing in her room, then suddenly she's a femme fatale again. Next, she's understandably suspicious of Sunset, then with a little prodding, cries into her shoulder and spills her guts, then goes right back to hating Sunset and vows revenge for a perceived slight she should have known wasn't true. Sonata went to get Sunset after all, and Sonata explained enough for Sunset to know what was going on. Adagio knows all this.

>Shaking her head reflexively, Sonata’s eyes refocused//

This says that Sonata's eyes shook her head.

>assuming an expression that was at the very least neutral, if less than pleasant//

That can be what she's trying for, but it doesn't guarantee she achieved it. She can't even see it to know for sure.

I haven't commented on this until now, but it's a bit off-putting how often you have quoted thoughts. One of the main points of having a limited narrator is so you can put the thoughts as narration instead of quotes. As narration, you're giving the reader direct access to the character's mind. As quoted thoughts, you're having the narrator tell us that the character thought something, which wedges an extra step between the reader and the character. There's nothing technically wrong with doing so, but it works against the strengths of this type of narrator, and it's a less intimate connection to the character. Most of your quoted thoughts could easily be recast as third-person limited narration.

>her face heavy with concern//

You're always telling me characters are concerned. Besides the sheer repetition, it doesn't carry much weight. What do concerned people do? How do they look?

>absent-mindedly//

absentmindedly

>Woah//

Please don't be one of the seeming majority of authors who can't spell this right.

>pulled a pair of sleek sunglasses//

Seems like you're missing a word, and you just described the motorcycle as sleek a few paragraphs ago.

>in awhile//

I'll just try to knock all these down in a single comment. If "awhile" follows a preposition, it really needs to be "a while."

>the skank//

Wow. Given she was thinking about picking up some trash at a bar, not sure how she gets off accusing Adagio of this.

>Get out and I won't bother you again.//

I'm as confused as Sunset right now. At least some of that just got discussed. Aria admitted she wanted Sunset to stay. But now she's telling her to leave again, and the true intent behind it isn't evident from the limited narration so far. So it feels like Aria's being indecisive, yet even her own thoughts don't indicate such.

>Maintaining an inscrutable gaze//

Again, this is more an external observation, since Aria can't see it herself to know.

>Setting//

Seems like this needs a "down" somewhere, but you don't have anything like that, which makes it feel incomplete. This paragraph also has several more of those participles synchronizing actions that should occur in sequence.

>Closing the last of her now stuffed suitcases, Adagio stood up, closed//

Repetition. And "now-stuffed" needs a hyphen.

>staring ahead and burning with a quiet, seething anger//

At first, I wasn't clear on when this happens. I gather she was already mad before the scene started, but on my first read, it sounded like she didn't get angry until this line.

>the sleek piano//

There's a lot of sleekness lately.

>subtlty//

Spelling.

>Again Adagio’s eyes closed, a warm smile on her blissful face as she once again//

Repetition.

>what sight laid on the other side//

Lay/lie confusion.

Now that I've stewed on it a bit, I think Sunset's conclusion about whether Aria is a good person was too simplistic. It's not enough to make a blanket judgment about whether she's good or bad. She's right—it does depend on perspective. But there aren't absolutes, either. People can respect that someone they don't like has done something good. Or they can think someone they count as a good friend has done something wrong. In this case, they're getting down in the semantics of arguing overall merit when they're actually talking about individual instances. Aria trying to enslave everyone is a bad thing. Her looking out for her sisters is a good thing. How to assess the combination of the two is subjective, but that's not the argument Aria's making. Yet that kind of is the argument Sunset's making. It seems like there's a bit of a disconnect. While it's true that can happen in real life conversations, it needs a little more careful treatment in writing, if indeed that's what you're going for, to make it obvious that's what you intended instead of just being an unintentional inconsistency.

>dimly light//

Typo. Though that phrase is pretty much an oxymoron anyway.

>She crept up to the door with a hairpin in hand//

Starting here, look over the next 4 or 5 paragraphs and see how often you end your sentences with some kind of participial structure. That's another kind of repetition.

>And there, not ten feet in front of her, laid the girl she sought//

Lay/lie confusion.

>sound asleep under purple covers and snoring softly//

You already said in the previous paragraph that she was snoring softly.

>back, slipping the knife back//

I'd recommend doing a Ctrl-f for "back" and seeing how many places you use it two or more times close together.

>closing the door behind//

Behind her, right?

>making her downstairs//

Another missing word.

>Stepping into her shoes, she opened the door, locked it and stepped//

Repetition.

>incessant//

Seems a bit of an odd word choice. Usually this connotes something annoying, but she's the one doing it.

>sky, bombarding the ground with innumerous drops of clear, pure water. A gloomy haze of murky grey clouds covered the sky//

>felt when first she felt//
Repetition.

>endearingly romantic novel//

This is certainly a subjective opinion, but this feels off from her characterization. You've had her tastes consistently on the raunchy side, yet here she's going for something very tame. Not that someone can't like both, but this is the first time I'm seeing this aspect, and it's pretty late in the story to begin introducing new personality traits that she's supposedly had all along.

>inscrutable//

You rather like that word.

Yeah, they're starting to use direct address more than feels natural again. Authors tend to do this without noticing, but look how often they call each other by name. They're the only two present, so why would they even bother?

>hoping that her nerves remained concealed by her deep breaths as she deflected the question//

There's another "hope" verb that might be better expressed through narrative comment. And the "deflected the question" is kind of over-explaining her motive. Narrative comment or just letting her actions speak for themselves will get this across more effectively.

>to not//

Reverse these.

>While Aria operated the contraption//

If Adagio can hear it running already, what more operation does it take? They're pretty hands-off.

>trying to surmise what the other one was thinking//

Adagio's your limited narrator. She would know this about herself, but not about Aria. She might conclude it from how Aria's behaving, but that 's different from stating it as a fact.

>Adagio would gladly have fawned over any other day//

But I haven't gotten the sense from her characterization that she would do this openly. She does like Sonata, but that's shown more as an undercurrent to their relationship, where they're more hostile on a surface level. It feels kind of inconsistent.

>“Are you saying…” Sonata cut herself off//

Would be redundant, but cutting off would connote a dash. An ellipsis is a softer pause.

>she looked up from the ground at Aria with wide, panicked eyes//

That's rather external to her perspective again. She'd know her eyes were wide, but panicked? She can't see them to evaluate that, and that's not the immediate way she'd sense her panic anyway.

>an increasingly panicked Adagio//

Same. This doesn't sound like Adagio's perspective.

>Adagio’s eyes went wide//

Last time you described them, they were already wide.

>her face paling//

How does she know this? She could feel it going cold, but she can't know it's pale.

>Aria moved over to the door, glancing outwards as if hoping she would merely see Adagio taking a breather outside//

So your perspective character has left the room, and the camera's stayed behind. It's fine to execute a perspective shift when you really need one, and the main point is to avoid reader confusion. Since Adagio's gone, that removes confusion that she can still hold the perspective, but who's taken it up? The "as if" here makes this so it can't be Aria's, since she'd know the truth. This statement speaks to uncertainty. So that leaves Sonata, but you need to establish her as the perspective character as soon as Adagio's gone. It takes a while before you have the narration do anything to establish a perspective, but once you do, it's Aria's:
>And damn her luck, they usually worked.//
So that makes this "as if" statement incompatible with the perspective.

>…//

This may cut it as a video game paragraph, but not in good writing.

>A part of her wanted nothing more than to find a bed and lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>In her mind, she imagined//

Where else would she imagine it?

>the shards of her gem laid on the ground//

Lay/lie confusion.

>But what would it matter, if they stayed where they laid forever?//

Lay/lie confusion, and you don't need that comma.

>incessant droning that seemed to go on forever and ever//

Isn't that what incessant means?

>suddenly//

This is a word that should be carefully considered. You can usually write things so that they seem sudden without having to say so. It's like having to assure the reader that a joke was funny. If you have to tell him, it probably isn't.

>a note or two here and there, barely managing the high pitch it once struck so flawlessly, and it cracked once or twice//

That's very repetitive structuring: note or two, here and there, once or twice.

>“Can’t hold it for very long,” Aria explained as she draped a coat over Adagio’s shoulders.//

So after saying she refused to talk to Adagio, Aria's the one who was singing, and she spoke first?

>hand off of her face, holding it tightly in her hand//

Another spot where the repetition is justified, but it needs some acknowledgement of the repetition, like "holding it tightly in hers" or "in her own hand."

>Music's in my blood, Adagio//

You really need to cut back on the unnatural amounts of direct address. This is the second time in a paragraph.

>Adagio’s smile broadened slightly and took on a warm, almost maternal glow//

>Her expression clearly showed her pain//
How can Adagio know this? She can't see it.

>“Watch your language,” she whispered into Aria’s ear.//

Adagio hasn't exactly been clean with hers. I'm left assuming she's just copying Sonata in saying this, but that's an awfully subtle thing to rely on the reader remembering.

>Smirking, Adagio took the shards//

Within the past few paragraphs, you've used "smug" and "smirk" twice each.

>continuing to stroke her hair and sooth her//

Typo. The verb form is "soothe."

>now stinging//

Hyphenate.

>she spoke in a low, seething hiss//

When someone says something in an unusual tone, consider putting the speech tag before the dialogue. Otherwise, the reader's going to hear it in a regular tone then either have to go over it again or accept it as a detached fact.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2646

>>2644
>>2645
>calmly as she could manage. "Just calm//
Repetition.

>her haggard, obviously distraught appearance//

This is the one time such an external observation works. She's looking in a mirror, so she can see how she appears.

>a pleasant, steamy aroma//

What's causing the aroma? Water doesn't have any, and you haven't said she added anything to it.

>as she laid down//

Lay/lie confusion.

Also, your participle use is spiking again, and you tend to place them at the ends of sentences only (though the beginning isn't a great option, if you believe John Gardner). Here are all the participles in the scene until this paragraph:
>still grimacing//
>Sighing//
>curling her lip in disgust at her haggard, obviously distraught appearance//
>making a mental note to give herself the pampering of a lifetime//
>Pushing thoughts of her troubles aside as best as she could//
>filling the room with a pleasant, steamy aroma//
>occasionally glancing back towards the door and glowering//
>unable to take her thoughts off of Aria//
>Satisfying herself that it was adequately hot//
>taking her time to get used to the heat as she laid down//
That's ten of them in only ten paragraphs and only fifteen sentences. It also lends your writing a choppy feel to have so many short paragraphs. None of these are longer than two sentences, and most are only one. They don't seem to be so uniquely thematic that you'd have to divide them all up in such short pieces like this, given thay're not broken up by dialogue.

>a blissful expression on her face//

How can she see this?

>She would be lying if she said she would take a bath over a swim in the ocean, of course.//

Seems like you're missing a "rather" in there.

>A blink and a start revealed that the sight was simply her mind playing tricks on her//

This is kind of bland, since the narration is supposed to be her stream of thought. Let the tone of the narration carry her mood, too.

Okay, I was wondering when the sex tag would show up. At least Adagio rebuffs Aria's advances on the basis of them being sisters, but the fact that Aria's trying to go for that in the first place might be problematic.

>Letting out a heavy breath, her expression changed to one of concern.//

Blunt emotional context, too external to the perspective, etc. But what I wanted to point out with this excerpt is that it says her expression let out a breath.

>Adagio set the gem//

Set it where?

>Reluctantly, Aria complied.//

So she wanted to seduce Adagio and now she's reluctant to sit on the bed with her?

>Lifting her eyes to meet Adagio’s, Aria’s face//

This says Aria's face lifted her eyes.

>for awhile//

a while

>Aria trailed off//

Redundant with your use of an ellipsis. And why does this need to be a new paragraph anyway?

>Laying together//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Adagio sighed, but resigned herself to her fate and laid back.//

Lay/lie confusion. This is the one thing I'm pointing out every time I see it, since once in a while you get it right, and I don't want you fixing the ones that aren't broken.

>an insistent gesture telling her to wait//

This gets the purpose across, but it gives me no clue what it actually looks like.

>now familiar//

Hyphenate.

>considering herself fortunate that her sisters had at least been considerate//

Repetition.

>They had apparently resolved to make up for the drama of the week prior by doting on her.//

This seems out of place with how Aria had been relating to Adagio before. I can see Sonata doing this, but Aria? Plus they all admitted to being mutually at fault, so why are they treating Adagio like royalty? I guess you'll get into this, but they're trying to turn over a new leaf, yet they're falling back into the same arrangement, so if it's an unreliable narrator situation where I can see the train wreck coming even though the characters can't, that's fine, but it seems inconsistent with how everyone's attitudes have played out.

>“Ready?” Aria asked, downing her fourth mug of coffee.//

How does Adagio know it's her fourth?

>Adagio nodded, and the three of them made their way out to the garage, ready for a grueling session of Aria’s demanding instruction.//

You've got an extra line break after this paragraph. Either that, or you have a horizontal line that FiMFiction is failing to draw on my screen (which happens from time to time and isn't your fault).

>it felt like knitting wearing mittens//

I'd encourage you to stick a "while" in there. Since mittens are something one might knit, it sounds like that's a product of the knitting, not a hindrance to it.

>Adagio's eyes fell to the ground, her expression somber.//

How can she see this, and even if she could, why's that what clues her into how she feels?

>to be laying back on a comfortable chair//

Lay/lie confusion.

>to let the saltwater sooth her//

Same typo you had on that word before.

>Because that, to her, was the whole point of the beach. To relax and enjoy the scenery. To feel the sea breeze blowing through her hair, carrying with it that distinctive salty smell.//

Why did she describe this as something most people don't appreciate? Lots and lots of people do exactly this at the beach.

>Because that was the point of beaches, to enjoy the scenery//

Yes, she's already said this.

You're giving me a bunch of these one-sentence paragraphs again. Don't overplay them. They make things stand out, and when a lot of things stand out, nothing does.

>still sorting things out. There might still//

Repetition.

>malevolently eerie//

Why would she describe her own laugh that way? That implies she wasn't into the purpose behind it, if she found it unsettling.

>a trace of affection//

There are lots of ways this could look, and there could be lots of motivations behind it. A description would help.

>Looking over at Sunset, she smiled.//

They've been smiling an awful lot, and I don't think Adagio stopped since the last time.

>by the time we’d been talking this long last time//

Kind of repetitive.

>“You never know,” Adagio remarked, smiling coyly.//

I'm a little surprised Adagio is so at ease right here, since, y'know, she actually did try to kill Sunset. And she's probably not feeling too good about that at the moment.

>“If there’s one thing my friends taught me, it’s that anyone can be a good person if they want to.” Sunset pointed to Adagio’s heart and smiled. “And from what I’ve gathered, you three really do care about each other, don’t you?”//

This gets back to a point I made earlier, that bad people can do good things and vice versa. Sunset's making an overly simplistic argument here, that if Adagio cares about her sisters, she must be good. It's more that she'd have an element of good to her, and maybe Sunset can draw that out, but that one aspect doesn't mean Adagio is entirely good. I mean, you don't believe that either, since what they did at the battle of the bands was bad, but I think this deserves to be a little more nuanced of an argument.

>If that’s not enough to tell me that you could be a good person, I don’t know what is.//

And your use of "could" here hints at it a bit, but still ambiguously, as it doesn't state whether it's that she could be inherently good or if she could be made good.

>taking advantage of the lull in the conversation//

You're literally in the next sentence after dialogue, and nothing has happened to indicate any time passing since then. There is no lull.

>But we'll see how things so.//

Typo.

>Make some friends, give up my villainous ways and be a productive member of society?//

She's playing this in an extremely self-aware manner, such that it comes across as very flippant. It also makes it as if she's already completely turned her life around to view it like this, but that would mean that her actual conversion already happened off camera, which carries less power, since the reader doesn't get to see her struggle at the critical moment.

>quietly sobbing//

That's a really sudden escalation. Take the reader on the journey there; don't just jump to it. For that matter, I can't be sure she isn't faking this. I assume not, since the narration's been keeping up with telling me when that's the case.

>a look of blissful calm on her face//

She can't see this to say so, and she just closed her eyes to boot.

>gently stroking her hair//

She just did that a bit ago. It's fine if she's still doing so, but acknowledge the repetition.

>holding her in as comfortable a manner as she could//

How does Adagio know this? She's reading Sunset's mind here.

>Glancing in the general direction of the sky//

That's pretty much anywhere but down. This is ridiculously vague.

>there’s…” she trailed off//

>I…” Adagio trailed off//
Redundant to narrate trailing off when you already have an ellipsis.

>Adagio laid down on her side//

Lay/lie confusion.

>however remote//

Set this off with a comma.

>pouring over it//

poring

Are they playing a timed match? Because otherwise, I'd expect his to take many hours.

>I don’t why I even bother.//

Missing word.

>Ignoring Sunset’s attempts at comforts//

I don't know why either of those is plural.

>Rooting through her bag, she finally took out a plain black book//

Just another example of a participle synchronizing things that shouldn't be.

>It’s my diary. Hundreds of years of memories.//

Hundreds of years in a single book? She sure doesn't write much of it down.

>Noting Sunset’s surprise//

You just mentioned Sunset's surprise a couple paragraphs ago, but you haven't demonstrated it either time.

This occurs to me that they wouldn't necessarily have to learn the tonality of Mandarin, for example. Because that gets removed when you sing it.

>There's far too much for one volume.//

Ah, there we go.

>Someone that they could rely on, someone that they knew they could go to for help//

For people, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>“Umm, I guess so, but I’d prefer if you-//

Missing your closing quotes.

>Adagio’s eyes fell, becoming downcast and troubled.//

That's rather bland. The narration is her thoughts. Make it sound downcast and troubled.

>her eyes falling//

Again?

>her expression taking a melancholic turn//

Vague, and she can't see it anyway.

>further…” She trailed off//

Redundant.

>Her eyes showed a blend of desire and pity.//

I was afraid of this. Where's the desire coming from? We've gotten no characterization from Sunset's side that would suggest there was an actual attraction there. And I suppose it's very telling that you have the sex tag, but not the romance one. Sunset's been nothing but genuine about wanting to help Adagio, and she has to realize that this isn't going to help anything. I could see her having some ethical debate over whether this would actually help in some way, but without that, she's completely undermining everything she's worked for. Not to mention that this aspect is coming into the story so late that it feels very tacked-on and somewhat artificial. We'll see how this plays out.

>laying on top of her//

Lay/lie confusion.

>I would very much like to see you again, but I don’t think this is the time.//

So Adagio's now making the argument Sunset should have. Man, this is all kinds of backward.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2647

>>2644
>>2645
>>2646
Okay, problem number 1: this gets racier than we're comfortable posting on the blog, particularly considering that Sunset is essentially underage here. I kept waiting to see if that would be the case, since up until this chapter there had been only a few oblique references to sex, and I found myself wondering whether that would actually need the tag. It's a shame, because this was a really strong story up until then.

I'd mentioned several times that some of the emotional arcs felt inconsistent, and that's one of the biggest issues I have with this being resolved with sex. As I'd also mentioned, this only develops so late in the game that it seems extraneous. If you'd built up to it the whole time, there's an arrow pointing that way, but nothing related to it ever came up until this chapter, aside from a couple of insincere one-liners. Nothing about wanting to be loved or wanting children came up until the last chapter. It was all framed as her letting down her sisters, and then suddenly there's this romantic interest that had never been hinted at from either side, and there's no impetus attached to it.

It's not related to Adagio's redemption. It doesn't solve any of her problems. She just takes advantage of Sunset at a time she's trying to act in earnest, and then she ends up abandoning Sunset, yet the irony of that is completely lost on her, since that's the lesson she just spent six chapters learning. And Sunset is entirely unfazed by the whole thing. Given the way things played out, shouldn't Sunset's argument have been that it's the emotional attachments that matter, and even if Sunset doesn't love her in a sexual way, that doesn't discount the kind of intimacy two people can share, and that Adagio should appreciate someone who wants to be close to her without that outside, self-serving motivation?

So it should be clear from the detailed notes that there are some persistent problems, like repetition, perspective slips, lay/lie confusion, quotation mark styles, dash usage, etc., but those are the kinds of things you can learn and fix. They're more or less cosmetic, though they can have a pretty big subconscious effect on how well a story flows, and I was certainly not exhaustive—these are meant to help you find the rest of the same things on your own, since it'd take me far too long to handle them all.

I'll be blunt. I thought it was entirely unnecessary to go to sex in the story at all, but that's immaterial to what you want the story to be, and it's immaterial to whether the story's good or not, and I'm fully prepared to approve stories that don't suit my tastes, as long as that's the only substantial knock against it for me. But the way it comes up feels like it's an entirely different story tacked on, as it was never broadcast earlier in the story, it's not tied into the themes you've developed, it actually produces a situation precisely opposite what Sunset and Adagio were trying to achieve, and neither one of them sees any problem with this. Well, maybe Sunset does, but it ends very conspicuously without any sort of reaction from her once all is known. Sunset was never portrayed as wanting a romantic involvement, and it was never a condition to Adagio's redemption. At best, there's maybe a Florence Nightingale Syndrome thing going on, but it's not played as such. Even when Aria joked about Sunset and Adagio getting together, or when Sunset was actually in Adagio's room, Adagio just brushed it aside as a stray thought, and then in chapter 7 makes a snap decision that sex is going to accomplish something. That doesn't evolve; it just comes out of nowhere.

The whole story had been marching toward Adagio feeling better about herself and reconnecting with her sisters. Which happens. In chapter 6. So chapter 7 is set up to be some kind of denouement, yet we get even more conflict introduced that just results in kind of a nebulous ending without resolving anything. She doesn't get the closeness or children she spent the whole chapter pining for, and there's not even a point made about that failure. I can't even call it an open ending, because there's no path ahead or stakes defined for any of the possible options. It really does come across as a semi-related side story where you just wanted to ship two characters, and it doesn't even turn that way until the last couple of scenes, since the majority of the chapter was their long conversation on the beach. It's the kind of thing that'd take its own 10k-word story to develop, but it blasts by in just a couple thousand words, rising out of thin air and disappearing just as quickly.

If you want it integrated into the whole, start doing that work way back in chapter 1 or 2. That means establishing exactly what attracts these characters to each other on more than a physical level and demonstrating what each wants to give and take from the relationship. Aragon has written a very good series of blog posts that I believe he keeps linked on his homepage, in which he discusses at length what it takes to portray an authentic relationship. Maybe on Adagio's side, she could be into it for entirely shallow reasons, since she's coming from a broken mindset, except that she relates all this history that should make her able to understand it much better than that. And it's unclear what Sunset ever thought this would accomplish or why she even wants it. Plus it's hard to see either of them not being worse off as the story ends. Adagio walks away from what she thinks could be real intimacy but uses a bunch of flowery language to try arguing this is a good thing. And again, we don't get Sunset's feelings on it at all. She's been used. It's as simple as that, and for a disingenuous reason.

I think it was a mistake to so completely drop the attempted murder. Maybe Adagio can't admit that to Sunset, but it barely resurfaces at all, even in her own thoughts, and that's a pretty big change of attitude she's gone through. It'd warrant some more self-examination rather than being forgotten.

If it was just a matter of not liking the ending, there would be no problem, but it doesn't make sense to me, and I don't even see what the entire last chapter adds to what came before. It speaks to the strength of those first six chapters that I cared this much about what happened to these characters. I'm betting you're locked into having the story the way it is now, and I certainly can't blame you for that, but the last chapter's very muddled in what it's trying to say, if indeed it's trying to say anything, and it doesn't tie in very well with the attitudes and theme of the rest. It's like one of those epilogues that's more of a curiosity than any further development of the story. Plus it's a bit over the line for what content we can allow.

Man, I feel like I'm saying the same things multiple ways, but I just want to be very careful explaining, since this feels like a huge wrench thrown into what was an otherwise great story. So I'll try to sum it up in concise fashion.

—Sunset spent the entire story wanting to reconnect with her sisters and stop feeling like a failure.
—She achieved this in chapter 6.
—Romance was never a condition of this accomplishment, nor was it even a subplot. It never came up until late in chapter 7.
—What basis does Adagio even have for wanting this romance? Since the battle of the bands, it's only been a week, and Adagio had only spoken to Sunset twice as anything other than enemies before inviting herself to Sunset's house and throwing herself at her.
—Adagio's either being truthful about wanting to be loved or not.
—If she's telling the truth, Sunset doesn't give her that, so what point is there in going through with the seduction? Maybe to get Sunset to concede, but that's going to be based on getting to know her, and two conversations plus sex isn't any more of a basis for love than two conversations.
—If she's lying, then it's unclear what she wants from sex, since the whole story has been about developing healthy relationships. I could take this as her wanting to give Sunset a reward for her help, but Sunset's obviously very reluctant, so why make her take a reward she isn't comfortable with?
—Abandoning Sunset is precisely what Adagio is supposed to have learned not to do.
—Despite being used, Sunset never reacts one way or the other. It's not that she stands there emotionless, though that would also be unsatisfactory. It's that the story stops before we even get to her reaction.
—This would need to be toned back some to fit the content guidelines we maintain to appeal to a general audience, not only in what happens in chapter 7, but also with Aria trying to seduce her own sister.
—I don't know what to make of the fact that this has the sex tag but not the romance tag, especially given that Adagio explicitly wants Sunset to love her.

Despite all this, I did very much enjoy the story up to that point, and you definitely show talent as a writer. I doubt you'd be willing to make such substantial changes to this story, but I hope you'd consider submitting others to us, and if you think I'm being unfair, you can request another opinion.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2649

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The tip of her shovel stopped halfway and made a hollow, wooden sound.//

I'm going to pull examples from the paragraph that starts with this line. Writers of intermediate experience often lean on certain structures too much, because they sound sophisticated, but the problem is that they're unusual in everyday use, so they stand out easily and quickly get repetitive. These are the participial phrase, the absolute phrase, and the "as" clause. Here are all the ones in this paragraph:
>Gasping and letting the shovel fall out of her hands//
>her eyes frantic and her heart beating loudly//
>the sight in front of her filling her heart with a mix of anticipation and dread//
>worn from age and degradation//
>Swallowing and breathing out her nose//
>fishing around for something//
>her fingers grasping the handle like a vice//
>Rearranging herself into a crouching position//
>causing her to lose her footing and fall onto her behind//
This is in a real rut, using the same structure over and over again. You can get away with this for more mundane things, since they're ordinary and pass without as much notice. It's more about breaking up the ordinary structures with regularly spaced variety than using unusual ones all the time. Note that there are attendant problems participles in particular have than you're likely to exhibit, just from the sheer number of them you use. I already see one: synchronization. Participles make things happen at the same time, whereas some of these would more logically happen in a sequence. Like this one:
>Rearranging herself into a crouching position, Sunset pulled upward on the handle with every bit of strength she had left.//
She probably doesn't pull on the handle until after she's rearranged herself.

>a mix of anticipation and dread//

I'll revisit this. It's better to demonstrate emotion than to state it outright, for the most part. This is a prime place to do so, because it's an important emotional moment in the story, and because you especially want the beginning of the story to be more evocative to snag the reader's interest. Your narration has sounded more or less omniscient, but there have been a couple touches of limited, like where you use sentence fragments to create a converstional feel. In either case, focus more on what behavior she displays that the reaer will interpret as anticipation and dread, and if you want a limited narrator, make the narration itself reflect her mood. What kinds of comments could the narrator make that would sound like the stream of thought from a person who was anticipating or dreading something?

>(Cough)//

This is a clumsy format. Just have her cough outside the quote.

>Sunset breathed a sight of relief//

Typo. And be very wary of these "in/of/with mood" phrasings. They're more of the type of directly stating character emotion I just discussed, but they're a particularly overbearing kind, since they're almost always redundant with information already there. A sigh can connote several emotions, and relief is one of the most common ones. If you think it's a little too ambiguous, some further piece of body language might complete the picture. In any case, that'll get across her mood in a much more engaging way than just having you tell me her mood.

>Scooping up her belongings and literally throwing them into her book bag, Sunset bolted up and out the door//

Here's another spot where an participle synchronizes actions that shouldn't be. Keep an eye out for these, as I'm not going to mark any more of them.

>hate filled//

When you have a multi-word descriptor right in front of what it modifies (unless it's a two-word phrase starting with an -ly adverb), hyphenate it.

>She wasn't even aware that she was holding her breath.//

This is very cliched. And if you intended to use a limited narrator, then the narration can't say what the focus character doesn't know.

>though she stopped when she saw her initial reaction//

It's ambiguous which "she" is which.

>alright...I'm//

It formats better if you leave a space after an ellipsis, except where it starts a sentence.

>We're friends now, aren't we?//

This could use some justification. Nothing's been mentioned about what they've done together since the Fall Formal, so I have no idea why Fluttershy would consider her a friend. Give me a little evidence of this. It could be as simple as Fluttershy mentioning a couple of things they'd done together to try convincing Sunset of this.

>shoulder length//

Hyphenate.

>is that you Sunny//

Missing a comma for direct address. You do this a lot.

>She was moments from screaming her head off before she felt her trembling in her embrace, her strange ramblings slowly turning into quiet sobbing.//

It starts to get hard to keep track of who all those "her"s and "she"s are.

>(huck)//

Yeah, don't put these sound effects in the dialogue.

>hopefully to get some help//

He couldn't handle her on his own? He didn't even try.

>You must be relatively new to this place, then.//

We'll see how this plays out, but it seems odd to me that a single suicide would be so noteworthy that the doctor would assume a complete stranger would know about it. And if the doctor's so familiar with it, why doesn't she recognize Sunset?

>Her arms went limp as she watched the doctor briskly walk into the corridor, unable to budge from that spot.//

Another thing you have to watch about participles is how close they are to what they describe. This makes it sound like the doctor is unable to budge.

>slowly started to quicken//

While entirely possible, that just has a strange sound to it.

>in awhile//

"A while" and "awhile" aren't always interchangeable. When it follows a preposition like this, you need two words.

>Taking a closer look, the creases on the paper were worn and dirty//

And yet another danger of participles is when you forget to include the thing they describe in the clause. This says the creases took a closer look.

>What are the odds that some girl who died in such a tragic way has the exact same name as me, let alone a girl from another world?//

Well, it's a coincidence that it's her double in particular, but she was already aware that such doubles existed.

>lying it face down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>street lamps//

streetlamps

>fifteen year old girl//

fifteen-year-old girl

>i can come over//

Capitalization.

>It wasn't exactly true that her phone needed any charging, she just didn't want to talk with anyone else tonight.//

This is the kind of thing that feels more authentic if you get at it subtly. Beware of over-explaining character intentions and motivations.

>(Drip...drip...drip...)//

Just describe the sound. This is an awkward way to handle sound effects.

>pinpoint the source of the noise. Though no matter how hard she focused, she couldn't pinpoint//

I've seen several places like this, where you repeat a word or phrase within a close space. Try to avoid doing this.

>second and third degree burns//

second- and third-degree burns

>Scrambling back a few feet, she twisted herself around and slammed a palm on the floor, sprinting towards the back door as fast as her legs could carry her.//

There are a lot of things synchronized here that shouldn't be.

>letting her know that she had just been burned//

This is really obvious. It's also an example of another problem, where you're using a very limited narrator, yet the narration isn't very relfective of her mood.

>The weakness in her voice made Rainbow's pupils contract as she looked at her.//

You're in Dash's perspective. How can she see what her pupils are doing?

>as she tried respond//

Missing word.

>She wanted to tell her everything. To just leap over and cry on her shoulder.//

You started the scene in Dash's perspective. Why are you jumping over to Sunset's now? It's a pretty short scene to need to do that. It's probably better if you pick one. You could have it be in Sunset's viewpoint, which means starting the scene outside with her. Or it you want it to be Dash, then don't jump over to Sunset now.

>(“I'm not lying, really.//

Don't format thoughts with parentheses. Either italicize it or put it in quotes and use a speech tag identifying it as a thought. But if you want the scene in Dash's head, she can't know what Sunset's thinking.

>I don't want to worry them anymore than I already have.//

"Anymore" and "any more" mean different things. You need the two-word version.

>You think for one second I'm gonna let you go back out into that freezing cold weather by yourself?!//

Why isn't Dash concerned about her going back to a place they know an intruder's been able to get in and threaten Sunset?

>kinda of//

Something's jumbled here.

>“...”//

That may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing.

>I'm about to give her a ride back to her house so we can call the cops.//

I really don't understand why she's comfortable with Sunset going back to her house. She can call the cops from Dash's house.

>I think things might get complicated with the cops if you got involved.//

How? I don't understand this.

>shouldn't of//

shouldn't have

>The immense pain she was feeling in her lungs earlier was back.//

Given that you're using a limited narrator, none of the narration sounds like it's in pain here.

>“Are you Sunset Shimmer?” The officer closest to her asked.//

Capitalization.

>As much as she was loathe to admit it//

"Loathe" is the verb form. You want "loath" here.

>ten minute drive//

>forty degree weather//
ten-minute, forty-degree

>knowing that she had to look irritated for them//

Why? What purpose does it serve?

>a moment a silence//

Typo.

>Either than//

other than

>abso-LOUTE-ly//

Not sure why you'd change the spelling. Do you want her to pronounce it differently or something?

>what its like//

Its/it's confusion.

>make due//

make do

>quaff//

coif

>this time showing clear discomfort//

How does she know? This almost makes it sound deliberate.

>just...!//

Those choices of punctuation do pretty opposite things. They don't play well together.

>Vice Principle//

Spelling.

>“ Wait//

Extraneous space.

>Sunset grit her teeth.//

The past tense is "gritted."

>Preposterous!” She said//

Capitalization.

>Her eyes went wide for a split-second//

There are quite a ew places where you use a she or her, but the most recently named character isn't the one you mean. It can get confusing.

>19th century//

In this usage, hyphenate it, and that's a short enough number to spell it out.

>widely//

Are you sure this is the word you meant? It's a strange choice, and it's repetitive with a "wider" you have just a bit later.

>anymore these days//

That's fairly redundant.

>her's//

No such word. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>be!” The maid gushed//

Capitalization.

>darjeeling//

That's a proper noun, so capitalize it.

>Ye~es//

Don't use a tildeto indicate tone. Just describe how she says it.

>crinkled mouth//

You just described her hair as crinkled.

>shoo'd//

shooed

>blemish!//

When an italicized word has a question mark or exclamation mark on it, include that punctuation in the italics.

>forty five degree//

Hyphenate.

>italian//

Capitalization.

>it,” The maid continued//

Capitalization.

>The maid thrust herself into face, “Even//

Seems like there's a missing word, plus you have that formatted like it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>started ,//

Extraneous space.

I don't get why Pinfeathers so easily gives in to both talking to Sunset and to letting her into the burned part of the house. At least Sunset notices this.

>Brick, mortar, and wood all laid strewn about/

Lay/lie confusion.

>a nervous tick//

tic

>soot-covered earth//

Why would the ground still be covered with soot? Wouldn't the rain have washed it away? It's been a long time.

>situation would've//

Extraneous space.

>soot covered//

Hyphenate.

So the upper floor collapses, and she's not at all concerned that someone heard it?

>thought,she//

Missing a space.

>LAUGHING!”, she//

You don't need that comma. You only use one to replace a period, and it would have gone inside the quotes, anyway.

Why hasn't it occurred to her that this bricked-up doorway may just lead back into the good part of the house? That'd make sense. A lot more sense than having someone come into this ruined part to block it off.

>a perpetual puddle of water beneath it//

They'd notice this in the water bill. Wouldn't they have done something about it? If it turns out it's not actually leaking, and it's just an illusion/dream, fine, but it'd be odd for them to just leave it dripping indefinitely.

>The smell was the strongest it's ever been//

I suspect that's just a typo, but you're going into present tense.

>in deliberate positions//

That's a really strange word choice. Deliberate? Someone intentionally arranged them this way? You don't give any evidence of how it looks to justify that.

>thirty degree//

Hyphenate.

>The object broke apart like pumice at her touch//

I'm not sure what imagery you're going for. Pumice doesn't break all that easily. Are you just saying it looks porous?

>“Wait, this isn't...this couldn't be her room, could it...?”//

Isn't that obvious by now? I thought she'd concluded that way back when she saw the water pipe.

>It was a steel folding chair, pristine and new//

This is the one thing in the room that stands out as being different from the rest. How did it not catch her eye immediately upon entering?

>She gave it a look as if it were the most unusual object imaginable.//

Why is she assigning imagery to her own expression (which she can't see)? It really distances her from how it feels if her cue to that is how it looks.

I'm beginning to wonder why, through all this visit to the house, Sunset hasn't once thought about the lady in the hospital, particularly once the cranes come up again.

Wait, if the mirror just crumbled from the fire damage, how haven't the windows done so as well, just from the wind against them after all this time? But Sunset had mentioned wanting to break them, so they're intact.

>burnt off floorboards//

burnt-off floorboards

>Gnarled, iron//

I'll skip the long explanation, but you don't need this comma.

>On the ground, there were trees growing in each corner of the courtyard and - ”//

I don't think she's supposed to be speaking here. These are probably extraneous quotation marks.

>(tep)//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

>an incoherent walla//

Or this.

>Spinning around with more force than necessary//

This one's got me a bit stumped, too.

>Standing in the collapsed hallway, was the other Sunset Shimmer.//

Unnecessary comma.

It should be clear what the main problems are. There's quite a bit of repetition, that thought formatting is just weird, and there are a few perspective slips. The one of those that stands out to me the most was the half-scene spent in Dash's viewpoint. The whole story is about Sunset's experiences and mystery, so there's not a compelling reason to go into any other perspective. There's also occasional spots where the emotion is just told to me instead of demonstrated through the characters' actions and appearance.

Beneath this, though, there's a good mystery. It's a fairly common premise, but one solidified a bit by the existence of actual doubles in this world, in contrast to the standard of it being some sort of descendant or reincarnation. There are a few logical gaps in how this is put together, but it does a good job of building tension, and you do have me wondering what happens next. There's also a nice trail of evidence so far that's inconclusive, though it'd be nice to see Sunset start to put together some theories. All she has is that Golden Ardor might have done it, and she has her doubts, but she's not coming up with any other possibilities or suspects. Of course, the initial assessment of suicide is still a viable alternative. Part of the allure of mysteries is sorting out all the lines of investigation, following false leads, revisiting abandoned theories, examining multiple suspects, and such, so the more you can do to add that kind of intrigue, the better.

Still, if you can get those other things fixed up, I'd be happy to post this. I do want to stress that I wasn't comprehensive. For the most part, I only marked examples of the problems I saw, not every single instance, so it'll be up to you to apply those corrections throughout the story, not just the spots I commented on. Give it a good scouring with these things in mind.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2652

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>geodes of the Everfree Forest//

You're fine, because the movie actually calls them geodes, but... they aren't. That really bugged me.

>Twilight sighed and continued to jot down answers on her papers.//

Seems odd Twilight conveniently came there to do the same thing as Sunset. Had they agreed to meet? And in this spot, it seems like Twilight's distracted enough that she'd take a pause in doing her homework. If she can get back to it so quickly, it tends to show this isn't actually bothering her much.

Your dialogue sounds okay, but look at your narration. At the beginning, before there was any dialogue, you mixed it up with different structures. But once the conversation begins, every single narrative sentence starts with the subject, and many are about the same length. That tends to make the narration sound very dull.

>back into her bag, standing back up//

Watch the repetitive phrasing.

Twilight sure finished her homework quickly. It took Sunset a while, and she's no slouch as a student.

>OK//

Spell this out as "okay."

>Dear Twilight//

>Your friend//
Needs a comma.

>The whole trip to Camp Everfree didn't really go quite as well as we'd thought and now magic's been on our minds for weeks on end.//

>Nothing new's spiked up for a while now and the other you settled in pretty well here. //
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>colour changed repeatedly through all of the colours in the spectrum before a short blast of white light stopped the flow of magic and restored the multi-coloured//

Three uses of "colour" in the same sentence.

>soft, momentarily//

You don't need that comma.

>The impact shot her eyes open and she could see the glass where she had entered the room from.//

Needs a comma.

>laying neatly at the end of it//

Lay/lie confusion.

>around the rest of the room, looking around//

Repetition.

>toy chest with various different toys//

Kind of repetitive. I'd recommend just calling it a chest.

>yellow pajamas with pink heart//

Seems like that should be plural.

>run down her forehead as she ran//

Repetition.

>"Are you in there?" She asked//

Capitalization.

>Sunset could only watch as the chest opened up slowly.//

You just used "slowly" in the last paragraph, and you mentioned Twilight's hand twice in that paragraph, too.

>Sunset chest and pulling her out. She could see that Sunset was as tall as her chest//

Missing a possessive, and you use "chest" twice close together.

>She could see that Sunset was as tall as her chest and gently put her down on all fours.//

let me revisit that. I don't see a dependency here. You mention the two together like they have some connection, but what does her height have to do with Twilight putting her down?

>hide and even tried to hide underneath the bed, but there was nothing that she could hide//

So the operative word here is "hide."

>Coming, mommy!//

When used as terms of address, capitalize family relations.

>white hair with two pink strips//

I assume you meant stripes?

>Mommy and daddy//

These also get capitalized when effectively used as names.

>Okay, mommy.//

Capitalize.

>Shining Armour//

I'm okay with British spellings in general, but this is a proper noun, and it's not how he spells it.

>here I come!" She exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>Sunset wasn't anywhere inside//

This is already the third "inside" of the paragraph.

>Where are you?" She sing-songed//

Capitalization.

>slowly//

You use that word quite a bit.

>That was a close call, wasn't it, Twilight?//

Why? She didn't seem afraid of the mother, so I'm not sure what the issue was. And even then, why'd Sunset stay hidden after the mother left?

>OK//

okay

>small giggle slip from her mouth. It slowly developed into a small//

Repetitive. And another "slowly."

>mommy and daddy//

Capitalize.

>"—Forget it//

The way you've punctuated everything, this should be lower-case.

>eight-year old//

Hyphenate all that.

>those magic shows mommy and daddy take me to//

Capitalization.

>a small, yet rapid and enthusiastic applause//

"Applause" is a collective thing. You don't give "a(n) applause."

You really ought to Ctrl-f for slowly and small so you can see just how may there are.

>returning the crayons and sheets of paper as well as Twilight dashed over to let her brother in//

That phrasing doesn't parse.

>brother, Shining Armour//

If you're going to put a comma there, use one on both sides of his name.

>He wore a black bag around his shoulders and a purple suit and tie around his body.//

That's a really odd way of saying he's got clothes on.

>innocently flapped her eyebrows//

You sure you didn't mean eyelashes?

>Sunset's invisibility wore off and she brushed Twilight's arm away.//

Needs a comma.

>Why do you hide from mommy and Shiny?//

Capitalization.

>This went on for a few seconds before she stopped.//

This is pretty self-evident.

>OK//

okay

>over to where Sunset Shimmer laid//

Lay/lie confusion.

>its'//

Lose the apostrophe.

>Sunset laid perfectly still//

Lay/lie confusion.

>eight-year old//

eight-year-old

>She walked over to the sink and reached up at Shining Armour.//

This makes it sound like the sink is nearby, but Shining Armor hasn't noticed Sunset yet? Surely that would get a reaction.

>giving her soap to give//

Repetition.

>I never forget mommy's teachings.//

Capitalization.

>Sunset Shimmer poked her head from around the corner and watched Twilight and Shining Armour.//

So she's not where Shining can see her. This could have been made clearer before.

>eight-year old girl//

eight-year-old girl

>let those thoughts sink in, she let//

Repetition.

>Twilight hung her body over Sunset's body.//

Repetitive.

>But, you're an eight-year old//

Just do a global search and replace on this and OK. And it's rare that you should have a comma after a conjunction.

>How can such intelligence like that be in someone as fun-loving and childish as you are?//

You're losing the natural feel of the dialogue here. They're awfully self-aware, and Twilight's sounding rather adult all of a sudden. They seem to be spelling out a moral for the reader's benefit instead of going through an authentic discussion.

>watch from afar as Shining Armour and Twilight made some cookies together. She watched//

>As she watched the two of them bonding//
Repetition.

>Once Twilight's parents had put their shopping away//

You start two sentences in a row with similar phrasings. And cookies take at least a little while to bake. What are they all doing in the meantime? You just skip to them being done.

>It's okay, mommy.//

Capitalization.

>where Sunset laid//

>to where Sunset Shimmer was laying//
Lay/lie confusion.

>Okay, mommy!//

>Sure thing, dad.//
Capitalization.

>Pinkie Pie mentioned something about them//

She's lived in the human world for years, and she doesn't know what a cartoon is?

>english//

Capitalization.

>Sunset Shimmer's brows raised and lowered at different parts of the show, her interest increasing and decreasing at various points.//

This is vague and uninteresting. It doesn't say anything.

>Then, a song came on//

This paragraph is very repetitive and ends up just rehashing that very self-aware monologue Twilight gave about wanting to enjoy being a child.

>Twilight gave Sunset the biggest hug she could ever muster up//

Is that really wise, considering Sunset is wounded? For that matter, if she actually has a concussion, she needs to take it easy for at least a few days.

>where her computer laid//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Sunset's mouth opened wide when she heard Twilight's response.//

Why? Twilight doesn't give a surprising response.

>Twilight fluttered her eyebrows//

Again, I think you mean eyelashes.

>question, read the question//

Repetition.

>She was about to grab another paper//

You have a narrative aside breaking into a quote, so don't capitalize it.

>suckling//

sucking

Sunset seriously needs to look up how to treat a paper cut? And after all the medical stuff Twilight's done, she doesn't know either?

>doctor Sunny//

"Doctor" is essentially a title here, so capitalize it.

>dial-a-beat-tees or something//

Her intelligence level is really all over the map.

>sustainable//

That's a really odd word choice. Did you mean stable?

>and proceeded to stack them on top of one another//

You already had them stacked in the last paragraph.

>"Got it!" Sunset cried out//

There's an extra line break before this paragraph.

>And it just grazes off of the edge of the skylight!//

I don't know what you're trying to say.

>she let a single tear drop from her eyes//

This is incredibly cliched.

>back, and walked back//

Repetition.

>it was the Twilight that she had grown more accustomed to; the one that she had met at the Friendship Games.//

Misused semicolon. If you replaced it with a period, the part after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>as the flavours danced in their mouths and left them speechless//

That must be really good food.

>I've been carrying it ever since; even when I had been a student at Crystal Prep.//

Another misused semicolon.

>Her name wasn't Sunset Shimmer, was it?//

Twilight remembers the name, but it never occurred to her that this Sunset has the same name?

>I would never leave friend//

Missing word.

There are a few pretty big logical leaps going on, plus a few spots I marked where the narration or dialogue loses its feel of authenticity. That can leave a story feeling stiff, so it lack an immersion that lets you get lost in the story. When it seems like the narration is saying pointless or obvious things, or it has a strange phrasing, it comes across like the author just wanted to move on to the more interesting parts. I've definitely been there as a writer, but you do have to keep up that careful word crafting throughout.

There's also a fairly weak theme. Twilight realizes this was her childhood friend, but there's no strong conclusion. Sunset tries to make one about not sacrificing childhood just for the sake of learning, but she doesn't make much out of it, and there weren't any significant consequences for Twilight, either. She said Sunset had been her first friend, but how did that end up shaping her life? And Sunset never tries to figure out how and why this all happened.

It's a nice plot twist, but one that's pretty apparent far before it happens, so make something out of it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2655

>that was the only thing to go through Spike's mind//
Capitalization.

>and no matter how much he hated the situation//

Set this dependent clause off with a comma.

>If the Rarity//

Extraneous word.

>It had felt like the first time he'd truly felt like his heart had broken.//

Missing a line break before this paragraph.

>For weeks he and yet when he'd finally worked up the courage//

Something got messed up in editing there.

>felt like the first time he'd truly felt like//

Repetitive phrasing.

>If she that were so//

>if he ever he could//
Extraneous word.

>good, long fly over the mountains would do him some good//

Watch the repetition.

>you." Came//

Punctuation and capitalization.

>That conversation had always been briefed//

Typo.

>from wandering.//

For some reason, this is on its own line and indented.

>he was quick to dismissed his shock//

Typo.

>and he shifted aside to offer his friend a space on the rock//

Set this off with a comma.

>drawing herself up slightly//

This is the third use of "slightly" in only four paragraphs.

>much of her sister, but he couldn't help but feel he'd voiced his question the wrong way.//

Extraneous line break and indentation.

>giggling slightly as she bowed her head//

And another "slightly" only a few paragraphs later.

>and averted his eyes to locks of her mane that hung over them//

I assume he's the one averting his eyes, but as you've worded it, she does.

>how much I loved it that is//

"That is" will normally be set off with a comma.

>amount of colts//

For individual items, you'd use "number" instead of "amount."

>thought the memory of the brown, earth pony colt that he thought//

Repetition.

>Sweetie Bell//

>a brake for Twilight//
Typos.

>to live to get together//

>It had been that that//
Something's off in the phrasing here.

>Sweeties laughter//

Missing apostrophe.

>he's fallen//

You've switched to present tense.

>Spikes mind//

Missing apostrophe.

>Noticing his friends crestfallen expression//

Missing apostrophe, and you'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>she has a special somepony//

You've gone to present tense here.

>So much for being fire proof, He grumbled internally//

Capitalization, and "fireproof" is one word.

>Even so, Sweetie Belle's words of kindness felt almost as magnificent as the sunset itself, even//

Repetition.

>That's why you came out here isn't it?//

Needs a comma.

>When I saw you leave you were heartbroken and as much as I've loved somepony before//

Needs a couple of commas in there.

>while he admitted love Rarity for her looks//

Phrasing is off.

>what he'd some to understand//

Typo.

>seen a mare more than looks//

I think you're missing a word.

>grounded with mare more truth//

Not sure what that's supposed to say.

>I didn't mean to stare Sweetie//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>not to something//

Missing word.

>the Rarity's//

Extraneous word.

>made him realized something//

Typo.

>'m just some creature that shouldn't really with a pony//

Missing word.

>"Spike," She declared//

Capitalization.

>like that did that night//

Typo.

>She gestured to the fading sunset with a hoof.//

Inadvertent line break and indentation.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2656

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Yet, today, no matter how many bromides she repeated to herself, Canterlot passed by, its sights and sounds growing and dying away in an incomprehensible and inconsequential blur, yet//

It creates the feel of a double negative to have those two "yet"s stacked up like this.

>yet all she could feel was the cool wind in her face; all she could taste was her heart in her throat; and all she could hear was the rattle and stir of the harnesses attached to the charioteers who were pulling her through the city’s airspace at a fearful speed.//

I don't see the need for semicolons in this list. None of the items have internal commas or multiple uses of "and."

>No, it was not apprehension, she thought to herself; it was more of a mild vexation, bordering on indignation.//

It's not going to engage the reader as much when you're feeding him conclusions about how Celestia feels instead of demonstrating them. It's important to get the reader connected to the character early in the story. All that language she uses to describe Canterlot with pride is a good example of demonstrating her emotion. So go into exactly how her mood manifests here. How does it make her feel physically? What sort of mental images does it evoke? What narrative comments might she make?

>She had been groomed since infancy for her position. When she had been a foal, somepony had always been lecturing her. In the morning it had been//

Fairly repetitive to have "been" in three consecutive sentences, not to mention that "to be" is a particularly boring verb.

>to not//

Reverse these.

>commander and chief//

I'm assuming you were going for the phrase "commander in chief."

>Yet her cheek twitched//

This is already the fourth use of "yet" in the story. Try not to get fixated on certain words like that.

>It’s as if I were some genocidal dictator being tried for war crimes.//

You didn't present that as an italicized thought, so it's like you're trying to switch to a first-person narrator.

>a little beige pegasus, dressed in a black pinstripe suit and a tie which he continually had to pry off his face when the wind of the carriage’s flight flung it out of kilter, sitting and looking rather uncomfortable next to her on the carriage//

The "sitting and looking" participle is located so far from what it describes that it's ambiguous what it describes. Participles like to modify the nearest prior object, so this has to leap over it, flight, wind, and face to get to "he," which is an awkward reference anyway, then suit and tie to get to "pegasus." This is just a seriously misplaced modifier.

Jeez, you use a ton of semicolons. I'd hope you'd want me to remember what happened in the story or your characterizations, not what writing tics kept popping up. And it's really ungainly to have more than one in a sentence, when they're not being used to separate list items.

>After much cursing, and some other words that would’ve probably sparked a revolution if the public had heard, Princess Celestia, unable to evade the fact that her sister was right, had given her reluctant consent to the free counsel, but, using the divers concerns that face a ruler as her excuse, had then proceeded to ignore the lawyer’s calls, to endlessly reschedule and cancel the appointments he had made, hoping that this whole “tribunal” thing was one of those issues that just went away on their own if she ignored them long enough, like the terrorist threats their administration received on a daily basis.//

That rambles on so long that I have no idea what point it was making. You do this a lot. It's even more muddled by the fact that you don't even keep these sentences on focus, constantly wedging in tangential asides.

>though his vexation with his client’s complacency remained//

So make him act the part. Just saying he's vexed does nothing to paint a picture, plus it's a bit soon after the last use of "vexation" to appear again without sounding repetitive.

>Princess Celestia interrupted//

That's already apparent from the dialogue ending in a dash. It's redundant to narrate it as well.

>This is a joke they’re playing on me, she thought.//

It's customary to put thoughts in italics, or if you're going to use a speech tag with them, you can put them in quotes.

>Queen’s Chrysalis//

Why is that possessive?

>full grown//

Hyphenate.

>not quite joy insomuch as it was a slight, modest contentment//

You're being really disconnected with the emotion again. This is a cold fact, not something that gets me to identify with the characters.

>The princess sighed, and gave a haughty, almost mocking, sidelong glance at him.//

You do this occasionally, too: there's an unnecessary comma before the conjunction. The same subject is linked to both verbs, so you don't need a comma.

>“The governing of Equestria fell to me!” she cried.//

As vehemently as she stated that requiring both princesses' signatures was a valuable check on individual power, I don't see how she fails to understand this or hadn't long since thought of it herself.

>as, legally speaking, the PRAT, as its power is delegated to it not through the Constitution but through the Equestrian Pony Rights Act, is not a court, but a tribunal, and thus cannot operate in federal facilities, as//

Fairly repetitive to have 3 instances of "as" in the same sentence.

After reading one chapter, I'm going to talk about what's putting me off so far. This is labeled as comedy only. And so far, there's a tiny bit of linguistic and situational humor, but for the most part, it's completely serious. I get that you're going for satire, but it hasn't gotten there yet, as everything that's happened so far is pretty reasonable. I don't even know what Celestia's going to be on trial for, and there's no reason for the story to hold it as a reveal, at least not that's apparent so far. There can be reasons to withhold information, like a first-person narrator who doesn't know or who avoids thinking about it. You have a narrator that's mostly omniscient but takes on a subjective feel at times, but not in a way that would be out of place in a comedy, if indeed this came across as one. It's a bit much to ask a reader to continue on to the next chapter when he doesn't know what the conflict is, he doesn't know why the topic is being avoided, and he's only seen a hint of the promised comedy. In short, it's not providing a good hook.

I'd complained a couple times about how convoluted the sentence structures can get, and I'll allow that can be a personal taste issue, but what's more objective about it is that the story is uniformly so. The narration, Celestia's dialogue, and Due Process's dialogue don't sound much different. It may not be problematic for the narration to sound like one of them—in fact, it's a good idea, if you're using a limited narrator. Even for omniscient, it's not that big a deal, but Process and Celestia aren't that differentiated by their diction. It's definitely a gray area, since I can tell them apart without looking at speech tags, just because Process stutters and uses direct address so much. In that way, their dialogue is differentiated structurally, but not so much in word choice and vocabulary. Having that differentiation at all is better than not doing so. That means that it's not the kind of thing I'd say was wrong, but it's worth thinking about in your future writing, as the more distinct you can make your characters, the better.

>as the carriage passed overhead//

He's in the carriage, right? This makes it sound like it's above him.

>As the carriage approached in for landing//

I don't see why "in" needs to be there.

>Due Process could see that not all of the yard was filled//

You've told me what he "could see" quite a bit already. Besides the sheer repetition, this language tends to point out that he was specifically looking for it or that it's a detail difficult to notice. Neither is the case. It's presumed he'd see whatever the narrator described as there anyway, unless you explicitly say he didn't or at least implied such.

>here and there could be seen the gaudy yellow armor and overblown crests of the Royal Guards, interspersed here and there//

>ground, and pegasi in the air so corpulent that Due Process wondered how it was possible for such tiny wings to lift such a great mass of muscle and armor from the ground//
Watch that repetition.

>divinely-appointed//

You don't hyphenate two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb.

>“Please, son,”—//

Don't use a comma in conjunction with a dash.

>much needed//

Hyphenate.

>mighta’s//

I don't see what this form accomplishes. How would this be said any differently than "might as"?

>maybe mommy tells ’im he gets no ice cream//

When you use a family relation as a name, capitalize it. Compare this to the "his mommy" you used just a tad before. That one's fine as lower-case, since the "his" takes it out of the realm of being used as a name.

>divers//

It's sticking in my head that I'm seeing this word a lot, too.

Now I'm at the end of chapter 2, and I'm still not seeing any humor or satire. There's still nothing legally unreasonable happening, so it's hard to poke fun at any of it. You're still being coy for some reason about letting me know what the actual charges are, though at this point, I'm beginning to assume it's because you want that to be a punchline.

>Mommy, mommy!//

Capitalization.

>having avoiding thinking about this issue for too long//

The verb form is off there. You need "avoided."

>two hundred, ninety-second thousandth, five hundred, and sixty-second//

The proper way to do numbers is to put commas only where you would for the numerals (or periods, if you use that system), there should be no "and" in there, and the ordinal only goes on the end. So:
two hundred ninety-two thousand, five hundred sixty-second

>eight hundred and five//

Improper "and."

>fifteen minute recess//

fifteen-minute recess

Good that we're finally getting into some humor in chapter 3. That's pretty far in for a story tagged solely as comedy. I'm still not at anything unequivocally satirical, though. There's at least a setup of such, in parallel to people's tendency to sue for any frivolous reason, but it's not entirely clear yet that the reason is frivolous, at least as presented. You could either be poking fun at such real-world cases or going for an earnest examination of how the child's mother has a point.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2658

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the grey earth stallion//

Such is the problem with these kinds of descriptors: they rarely tell the reader things he doesn't already know, so they're redundant. You just said in the last paragraph he was grey, and you already used "he" to describe him, so we know it's a stallion. Not to mention it doesn't play well with the limited perspective you've chosen, since it implies Rarity would choose to refer to him with such a phrasing in her own thoughts.

>It was why she was out in the park, anyway.//

Given that she goes on to say this as dialogue, it's redundant.

>the Sergeant//

When you use ranks generically, which usually happens by putting an article in front of them, they don't get capitalized unless they're really high up or unique (this is why Princess can be done that way, if it's meant to show respect). Captain and sergeant aren't high enough ranks to justify that.

>baulk//

I've only ever seen that spelled as "balk."

>Ponies could only cross at specified times and Rarity couldn’t cross until half-six in the evening.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>If she ever met the idiot that had ordered the raid on the Harmony District//

For sentient beings, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>Nachtkönigin//

You may well know far more German that I do. I haven't had a class in it for a couple decades, and I haven't had a good opportunity to practice speaking it for over ten years. But it seems to me there would be an adjective ending between the word parts. Some of those were always a great mystery to me, as they didn't always follow the same rules in compound words as they did in separate adjectives, but for some reason, I expected this would be "Nachtskönigin."

>The dark Pegasus stallion//

Again, your use of a limited narrator means that this is how Twilight would think of him, even though she's familiar with him and knows his name. You don't refer to your acquaintances in such terms, do you?

I'm getting confused with the languages. Apparently the day side speaks Dutch, and the night side speaks German. So where's the English coming from?

Also, I know enough Dutch and German to understand what everyone is saying, so I'm a bad judge of whether the average reader would pick up enough from context or be lost.

Okay, so you later say it's not Dutch. I can't tell the difference, but then I learned Flemish, not proper Dutch.

>“I was expecting something more old-timey,” whispered one of the humans.//

See, this just reiterates what the narration already said. It's redundant unless you do something to make each instance of it do something different. For example, Rarity predicts this reaction. Then she gets it. If you don't do anything with that, it's mindless repetition. If you draw some meaning or characterization out of it (like having Rarity gloat that she was right, maybe), then it accomplishes something.

>There was still room for her when they’d boarded and her little act of generosity meant she was the first to disembark the tram//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Made out of sapphire glass, it was crystal clear//

If it's clear and not being used for jewelry purposes, why wouldn't they just call it corundum?

>whose boss//

You mean this to say "who is," not show possession. You want "who's."

>G-Goedenavond//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

Okay, so Fluttershy speaks in Dutch, and Rarity answers in German. In my experience (which is admittedly a long time ago), Fluttershy would understand it but be really put off, probably angry. She might suppress it, but there'd be signs. Yet she doesn't react. Or since Fluttershy is from the night side, is German native to her? In that case, she was speaking Dutch as a courtesy to Rarity? Then I ask again: where is all the English coming from?

It's now getting really ungainly that you have to keep mentioning what language everyone is speaking on nearly every line of dialogue.

>she’d overdid//

Either "she overdid" or "she'd overdone."

>there would be no prostration on the ground and Nocturnal Equestria’s Ministry of Information was insane//

>The sun was beginning to set and she could see the faint cyan glow she’d normally seen from her apartment window.//
Needs a comma between those clauses.

>The buttery yellow Pegasus mare//

You already described her as such, it's something every reader already knows about her, you hyphenated it last time, and this is one of the absolute most cliched phrases in ponyfic.

>What a lovely accessory, he has!//

No need for that comma.

>She gestured to the Pegasus city above//

Rarity just "gestured" a few paragraphs back. It's a little soon to reuse a word choice without it sounding repetitive.

>whom hooted once in response//

"Who." It's the subject of this clause.

>She suddenly noticed//

This is the exact same way you started two sentences ago.

So, after one chapter, I'm tossed into a world where I have no idea how it got this way, I don't get how the languages work, I have no idea what purpose it serves to have humans in the story at all, and there's various terminology like "blindsight" thrown around as if I should already know what it means. I can't tell whether the two worlds are related as day/night or as dream/wakefulness. It's an interesting world, but if as a reader I feel like it's too confusing and all going over my head, I'm not likely to read on. I'll continue on through as many chapters as you've published so far, but I think you have an accessibility problem.

Another word about chapter 1: you're awash in boring "to be" verbs. It's much more engaging to use active verbs where possible. Of course, it's not practical to remove them altogether, but you can manage them for the most part. Of the non-ambiguous ones, you had 153 in this chapter, and 79 instances of "was" alone. That's a "to be" verb every 28 words, or about once every other sentence. That's how often nothing happens.

>room’.//

That period would go inside the quotes.

>in horror//

It's a good idea to avoid prepositional phrases that contain a mood or emotion like this. They just push a conclusion on the reader instead of showing him the evidence and letting him draw his own conclusion.

>There was always going to be exceptions//

You have a mismatch in number: was -> exceptions.

>Rarity had counted at least a dozen different styles of foreign clothing and the visitor’s hat steadfastly refused to coordinate with any of them.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, but this is completely redundant with the previous sentence.

>Ottoman//

That word's in such common usage now that it doesn't need to be capitalized when it refers to the piece of furniture.

>“Lang lebe die Nacht,”//

Why'd you stop italicizing the other languages?

So I guess the English is only for the reader's benefit? It's really hard to pull off a switch like that in a written medium, because it doesn't come across the same way as it would in a movie, say. The reader's not going to keep reminding himself that they're actually speaking something other than English, because in the end, what does it matter? It's fine to have one side speak something different to illustrate another culture, but to have both be different? Really, if the day side actually did speak English, what about the plot of your story would change? I'm betting nothing. Then it becomes an irrelevant detail that makes things more complicated without accomplishing something else in return.

Now that Twilight's turning the conversation toward why Rarity is there, you're finally getting to the conflict, but the problem is I'd have no idea what the conflict even is, except you described it in the synopsis. The story needs to say so, too, unless there's some sort of internal justification as to why the subject is being avoided. You've mostly used a limited narrator in Rarity's perspective, and that would mean she refuses to think about the killing or that she's so occupied with other things that it doesn't even occur to her. Neither one is plausible under the circumstances, so I don't know why the story is playing coy with it.

>Your superiors know about this folder, the Head of the Marechaussee assured me he spoke directly to Grand Inquisitor Sunset Shimmer herself//

Comma splice.

>Rarity’s averted her gaze//

Extraneous possessive.

>she wasn’t sure if she should have seen that but she wasn’t going to take any chances//

>she’d find some way of gleaning more information and they couldn’t stop her//
>He led her and Fluttershy down to the basement where the Inquisitor waited for them in a large meeting room.//
Needs a comma between the clauses.

>die ersten Pony//

Again, maybe I'm just too far removed from my German classes to remember, but there seems to be a mismatch of gender here. You're in accusative case, so "die" indicates a feminine noun, but "ersten" has a masculine ending. I don't know off the top of my head what gender "Pony" would be, but borrowed nouns, especially ones ending in "y," tend to be neuter.

>Well, of course, thought Rarity.//

Why isn't either the thought dialogue italicized or in quotes?

>The train journey there took a good six hours and she’d spent two days there.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>edges perfectly parallel with the edge//

Watch the repetition.

>“The Harmony District is a special location,” explained Inquisitor Sparkle.//

You're falling into a rut by having dialogue start all the paragraphs that contain any.

>Pegasus//

If you're not going to capitalize all the races, don't capitalize this one either. Otherwise, it refers specifically to the winged horse from Greek mythology.

>The unicorn’s name turned out to be Orchid Dew.//

How so? Did she answer Rarity's question? Did Rarity look at the paperwork?

>concernedly//

You're really going overboard with these adverbs in this chapter. A lot of them are attached to speaking actions. Adverbs are fine when they change how an action happens, like softly or quickly, but when they communicate an emotion, you ought to consider whether you could demonstrate that emotion through character appearance and behavior instead. How does a concerned person act? Have Rarity do the same things.

>best, reassuring//

No need for that comma.

>many a criminal had given her the same stare and she had learnt to brush it off herself//

Needs a comma.

>Uh-okay//

Please use a proper dash for anything other than a same-word stutter.

>partially in relief//

Another one of those ungainly prepositional phrases that directly informs me of a character's feelings, plus it points out its own shortcoming by never saying what the other part of the "partially" is.

>irritably. “Witnesses to the body dump claimed it was transported in a carriage,” she said irritably//

So she's irritable, you say?

>I thought we could use it to prove something but if it was stolen//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>meant no one kingdom’s national infrastructure could extend into the area without triggering an international incident. That meant//

Repetition.

>despites//

Typo.

>houses either side//

Missing word.

>as if there as//

Typo. Not sure why the editing is getting worse here.

>between the two kingdoms, making it look as if there as some invisible anti-plant force field between the two kingdoms//

Repetition.

>started to count under her breath as her horn started//

Repetition. I'd also caution you against making much use of "start" and "begin" actions. They're often needlessly auxiliary to the real verb, and it's obvious that any given action would begin. It's only worth pointing that out if the beginning is noteworthy, like it's sudden, or the action never finishes.

>above. There was a rumbling on the floor above//

Repetition.

>in builder’s yard//

Missing word.

>Party Favour//

Normally, I don't mind British spellings, but there are a few cases where I do. Proper nouns are one. This isn't his name.

>They knocked the Inquisitor through another door and Thunderlane crashed into a wall.//

>She’d have to chase after them and she’d end up all sweaty and smelly afterwards.//
Needs a comma.

>seven year’s bad luck//

years’

>she didn’t have to worry about heterotopic ponies at that time of the night. So long as she didn’t try anything too risky, she’d be fine//

I don't get the reasoning here.

Okay, you explain it in a bit, but it's still part of the world building you never really covered. It doesn't help that I'm awash in jargon, which makes the reader have to think longer to sort out what you're saying.

>went over heels//

Isn't it "head over heels"?

>Qilin//

...Aaaaand I have no idea what you're talking about, which makes this an irrelevant detail. It doesn't matter if I understand it, by definition, since I have no chance of understanding it.

>That’s quite enough, darling//

You have her using "darling" and "dear" far more often than she actually does in canon. Check out the transcripts. She rarely says either more than a couple times per episode.

>In the distance, Rarity could hear sirens.//

You just used "could" in the previous sentence, plus the usage here implies it's a detail most people would miss, and I doubt that's the case. What do you lose by simply saying she heard them?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2659

>>2658
>without so much of//
That's usually phrased as "without so much as."

>into the alley. As she dragged him into the alley//

Repetitive phrasing.

>like through a sieve//

That's an odd phrasing.

>So how, are they?//

Misplaced comma.

>she thought better to enquire further//

Seems like this should be "she thought better than to." And this is already your third use of "enquire" in the last nine paragraphs.

>She was suddenly aware that seemed to be some kind of colour scheme going on//

Missing word or typo.

>Imperialism!’,//

When there's other end punctuation, it replaces the comma; don't have a comma in addition.

>The Inquisitor greeted two Lictors stood guard outside a room.//

Phrasing is off.

>adjacent Night Glider//

I've always seen it phrased as adjacent "to," but if you're familiar with using it this way, that's fine.

>her words translated by Fluttershy//

Why is this necessary? If it gets overly complex, maybe, but in my experience, most Dutch speakers can get the gist of things said in German.

>the pony that did this to you//

For sentient beings, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>don’t— No//

Don't leave a space after an em dash.

>If you need anymore//

"Anymore" and "any more" aren't interchangeable. You need it to be two words here. If you add in the implied noun, what looks right, "anymore water" or "any more water"?

>She seemed to be breathing strongly//

You said almost the exact same thing almost a page ago.

>Originally it was for disguise purposes, the spell-caster would use it to swap cutie marks as a form of disguise.//

Comma splice.

>Her body tremored with terror.//

Consider that you've been using a limited narrator, i.e., you have the narrator voice Rarity's unspoken thoughts for her at times. If she's in terror, then shouldn't her thoughts sound like she's in terror? This is delivered so calmly and stoically.

>She presumed the doctor had said Party Favour was unconscious.//

Given the earlier "Rarity heard Minuette say something about unconsciousness," this would be self-explanatory.

>but I’m sure she forbade you from dream walking her//

Given that she commented a couple times already on what she thought the doctor had said, why'd she skip this part?

>If we can wheel Herr Favour//

Since it's a direct object, doesn't the weak noun take an extra n, i.e., Herrn Favor? Or does it not work that way when it's used as a title?

>that was a recent development but most ponies agreed it was a good idea when they heard it and the Government had adopted it wholesale from its American source//

Needs two commas to separate clauses.

>her reply seemed to take the Nocturnal Equestrian aback//

How so? What did Twilight do?

>Rarity didn’t need to know that Inquisitor Sparkle had sworn this oath but the Inquisitor had insisted on telling her anyway.//

Needs a comma.

>Rarity could imagine Mevrouw Twilight Sparkle stood in front of a class//

The verb form of "stood" is off.

>Daring Do amongst the students, fast asleep, drool running down her blue cheeks//

Daring Do is blue? I can't fathom why you'd change it to that. What difference does it make?

>“I think,” she began//

It's odd to have "began" as the speaking verb when it's not even her first dialogue of the paragraph.

>started getting dirtier. It started//

>seemed to be attempting to unearth an earthenware vase of draconic proportions. Though huge, something about it seemed//
Repetition.

>She started to channel magic into her horn.She started to channel magic into her horn.

And another "started" soon after, but I've already bugged you about using this verb sparingly anyway.

>unearth more of the earthenware vessel, but there was still a large amount buried in the earth//

That's three forms of "earth" in a single sentence.

>There was none. Her mane was fine. She breathed a heavy sigh of relief.//

That's awfully bland for a limited narrator in a situation that should be emotionally charged.

>I’ll have a word with my guvnor about this but you can’t stay here//

>You know we couldn’t dream walk her and Glimmer wouldn’t confess//
Needs a comma.

>“You know something, don’t you?”//

I have no idea who says this.

>Rarity’s eyes snapped opened//

Typo, and you need a comma after this.

>GLider//

Typo.

>She looked at Rarity as if the white unicorn had suffered a brain aneurysm.//

...As if she's extremely concerned and about to summon medical help? I think you're going more for something like insanity.

>membership of that political movement//

I've always seen that as "membership in."

>There were no lanterns or street lamps and the cloud houses around her were dark//

Needs a comma.

>glowing luminescent//

Technically, those are different things. Luminescence is a property of a material, and it possesses that property even when conditions aren't right for it to glow. But most readers won't know that, which will make this sound redundant. Your call.

>Up this high, the ponies wore luminescent bands. Some wore luminescent leggings whilst others just leg bands. Most wore clothes that had luminescent strips sewn into the fabric.//

You sure like that word a lot. The first two sentences sound a bit contradictory. It's alo making me wonder how they charge these things. Luminscence means they absorb light, then give it off later even after the light source is removed. So how do they charge them, especially if it's the nocturnal side? Moonlight wouldn't do much, since it lacks the intensity and doesn't have the same spectrum.

>Guards stood guard//

You don't say... Surely you can rephrase that like "stood at their posts" or something.

>Like the Lictor that Rarity had seen//

"Whom," not "that."

>“Why yes; yes, we are!” interrupted Rarity suddenly//

A few things. First, the "interrupted" is redundant with the fact that Twilight's dialogue ended in a dash. Second, "suddenly" is pretty much implied by an interruption, but even in general, it should be used sparingly. If something's sudden, it should naturally come across that way through how you write it. Needing to say so is like having to assure the reader that a joke is funny. Third, when there's an interruption, the very next thing should be what does the interrupting or it takes away from the sense that it was abrupt. So the fact that the narrator managed to wedge in "began the Inquisitor" before Rarity's speech that cuts Twilight off, it disarms the sense that it was immediate.

>he thought better of pointing it out//

This is the second time you've used such a phrasing, and I wonder if it just means something different where you're from. Whenever I've heard the phrase "thought better of," it means the person has raised his opinion of something. "Thought better than to" means he decided he shouldn't do what he'd been considering, which seems more like what you're trying to say.

>in her best Nocturnal Equestrian//

How does Rarity know that's her best? She hasn't known Fluttershy long. For that matter, why wouldn't Fluttershy know it well? She lives in Nocturnal Equestria, doesn't she? That's the only place we've seen her until now, and nothing has come up to refute it.

>past the Ionic columns//

You already mentioned what style they were. Does it really warrant mentioning again?

>It was much nicer inside the prison; not toasty, but warm enough.//

Misused semicolon. What comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>Rarity didn’t pay much attention to international news but what little she had read suggested it was fully in the hooves of the Army.//

Needs a comma.

>Frau Glimmer//

I notice that you always treat the second word of their name as if it were a last name, but family names don't always work like that in Equestria, like with Apple Bloom. I suppose canon hasn't said whether "Starlight" or "Glimmer" is the family thread, if indeed either one is, but just as an interesting tidbit of world-building, it might be nice to see that get switched up here and there, if you care to.

>Then he touched the door and it immediately became transparent.//

Needs a comma.

>as if she was//

You're speaking hypothetically, so use subjunctive mood, which is always "were" in past tense.

>the People’s Thing//

These two explanations for the parliaments are really wedged in. They don't fit the narrative style at all. Rarity's your limited narrator, so this implies she's thinking about the governing bodies when you go off on these tangents, yet I can't see a reason why she would be. At least this one tries to give an explanation, but it's not framed too well. You say she makes the point about how it works to Starlight, so just show me what she says. That way I still get the explanation, but it's relevant instead of trying to retcon it in through narrative summary after the fact.

>isn’t the time nor the place//

The "isn't" and "nor" create a double negative effect. You'd more typically see "isn't the time or the place" or "is neither the time nor the place."

>She looked at Starlight imploringly.//

That's a rather external judgment of how she looks, given it's her limited narration. If you're imploring someone, think about the intent, the mindset behind it, the way it feels. Not the way it looks, because she can't see her own face. When you have a perspective, be careful that the emotions are presented as how that character would perceive them.

>The cerise unicorn//

Rarity knows her name by now. Why is she still referring to her like this? And why is she using a different color than before, anyway, if you insist on doing this? It's inconsistent and can make it sound like there's yet another character present.

>then to the white unicorn//

And that's even worse. It's bad enough to have Rarity use an abstract descriptor for someone she's acquainted with, but herself? You don't call yourself "the ponyfic-writing human" in your own thoughts, do you?

>metallic grille//

You keep calling it that. I get the picture.

>whom nodded slowly//

Set this off with a comma, and it's just "who." It's the subject of this clause. Try replacing it with "he" or "him," and it usually helps figure out whether you need the nominative or objective form.

>And the pony that visited me//

"Who," not "that."

>the pony whom had been window-shopping there//

who

>had got//

had gotten

>dared. Only foals dared//

Repetition.

>she said gestured to the four cell walls//

I assume you meant that to be "gesturing." And if so, set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>He says they’ve arrested some mare called, Moon Dancer?//

Why is that comma there? They aren't for dramatic pauses.

This turned out to be a rather good story so far, but I think it has three more general things holding it back. I've at least mentioned them all before, so I'll sum them up here.

The type of descriptors we term "Lavender Unicorn Syndrome" because of the prevalence of using phrases like "the lavender unicorn" in this fandom do have their uses at times, but for the most part, it's best to avoid them, and they're a particularly poor fit for a limited narration, since the character would rarely actually think about other characters that way. It's an avenue where the story can have a broken perspective.

The other two I can lump together into accessibility. There's a balance to be struck when introducing a reader to your unique world. You don't want a huge infodump explaining every nuance of it up front, because the reader has no reason to care about it yet, and you'll just bore him to tears. You also don't just want to toss the reader into the middle of things and hope he can figure everything out on his own. There's a sweet spot where you give out the information as a subtle but steady flow as it becomes relevant to what's happening, ad the reader often won't even realize he's getting a history lesson. Take the part where you talked about the two parliaments. That was very conspicuous. But look at how far we have to get in before we realize what the conflict even is. Then take why we get to read nearly everything in English, yet we're told none of it actually is, and through 4 chapters and close to 20k words, I still have no idea why that'd be the case or why it's necessary, not to mention what humans have to do with anything. If it had been a pony killed, I don't see how it changes the plot at all. Maybe it's just meant as a parallel to the source material, where there's a third race or faction you want the humans to represent, but you still have other Equestrian races that could stand in, and I haven't read the novel, so it means nothing to me why humans might make the best choice. You have to come at a crossover as if the reader doesn't know anything about that other material. So it's very far into the story to still have so many unexplained things, and you're asking a lot of readers to take it on faith that it will eventually matter. You have to build that investment as early as you can.

Really, that's the biggest thing. I've spent so much of the story confused about what's happening and why, and that's not a good thing. If you can tune that up then I'd be happy to post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2660

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Your editing's actually quite good, so I don't have a lot of detailed feedback. Here's what I did compile:

>Allegra//

Why is she named after an allergy medication? Are you sure you didn't want "Allegro"?

>us-“//

Please use a proper dash (and note that in the places you did use one, you shouldn't have a space after it) and note that certain punctuation can break smart quotes. They're turned backward here. This happens in other chapters as well.

>“Elliot and I,” corrected several family members at once.//

Actually, they're wrong. People are so desperate not to use "me" inappropriately that they end up using "I" inappropriately. "Elliot and I" is nominative case, equivalent to "we." "Elliot and me" is objective case, equivalent to "us." Now, going back to the original instance, what sounds more correct, "your discontent for we" or "your discontent for us"? It's a compound object of a preposition, thus objective case.

>nice, quiet, room//

You don't need the comma between "nice" and "quiet," since they're hierarchical adjectives, i.e., they describe different aspects and would sound really odd in reverse order. You don't need the other comma either because you never place one between a modifier and its object.

>Still in shock from Octavia’s sudden gesture of kindness//

You've been in Octavia's perspective. Well, I say that because except for that one paragraph that switched to Vinyl (more on that later), anything subjective in the narration was representative of Octavia's viewpoint. This is from Martha's though, or would somehow require Octavia to read Martha'a mind as phrased. If you give the external evidence of it or explicitly say this is what Octavia thinks to be the case, that's one thing, but outright stating it as fact is quite another.

>much!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>thank you, cousin//

Family relations get capitalized when they're essentially used as names, so "that's Mother," but "that's my mother."

>arranging the electronics neatly against one wall and arranging//

Close repetition.

>Christmas tree lights//

Did you forget to make that a Hearth's Warming?

>whom only had one present//

who

>Tympani//

That's odd that a percussionist would be pigeonholed into playing tympani only. Maybe they need a specialist in it, but wouldn't they want someone who could play all the percussion as needed? Not every piece includes tympani, after all.

>details;//

What follows is a sentence fragment, so the semicolon isn't used right. You're defining those details, so a colon would be appropriate.

>ect.//

Typo.

>happening!!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>read aloud//

Third time you use that phrase or some close variation in three paragraphs.

>big wig//

In this sense, it's one word.

>and—“ she was cut off by Octavia.//

Backward quotes. Also, the dash already means she was cut off. It's redundant to narrate it as well.

>her family members started praising her and her talents//

You go on to have them say these things, so this is redundant.

>The rest of the day seemed like a blur. All her family members wanted to help her get ready for the audition, so nearly the rest of the day//

Repetition.

>Martha and Elliot were especially enthusiastic in supporting their relative.//

It's like you wanted to end this chapter as soon as you could. You're glossing over all kinds of things. If this is important (and it seems like it is), it'll mean a lot more for the reader to see it as it happens instead of getting a narrative summary after the fact.

>It was about a week after Hearth’s Warming//

It's strange that you ended the last chapter with Octavia noticing something was off about Vinyl, then you start this one without addressing it at all. She hasn't resolved or even thought about that in the intervening week?

>One of the carriage ponies cut her off.//

For one thing, it's already obvious she got cut off by your use of a dasj to end her dialogue. For another, I'd place any speech attribution after the dialogue. If it's truly an immediate interruption, then that interruption needs to happen right away. It undermines that if the narrator has time to say anything between the cutoff and what caused it.

>each contender had to play a five-minute piece of their choosing, along with the sight reading portion of the audition//

This isn't particularly relevant at the moment.

>There were two stallions; a black unicorn with brown hair tied up professionally, and an earth pony whom Octavia recognized right away as Mr. Woodwinds.//

Another semicolon that should be a colon.

>And whom, may I ask, is she?” asked//

"Who," not "whom." And when she actually uses the word "ask," it's repetitive to have it as a speaking verb.

>I will conduct you to make sure you keep time.//

That's strange. I can see them wanting to see how she handles following a conductor, but for the stated purpose, I'd think they'd want to see how well she could keep time on her own. That's an old music teachers' trick, to turn on an electric metronome, get the band started, mute the metronome, let them play for a while, then turn the sound back on to see how far off the beat they are.

>it made her feel nervous and queasy all over again//

While she's playing? This would be great imagery, if you could portray it: self-defeating thoughts running through her mind and her stomach churning as she struggles to keep focus on the sheet music and the conductor.

>state whether or not you have been accepted into the orchestra,” stated//

Repetition.

>she beamed//

Very questionable as a speaking verb. How do you beam a sentence?

>the unicorn//

You're in Octavia's perspective, and she knows Vinyl well. Is she really going to refer to her with a descriptor like this? Would you think about your own friends in similar terms?

>rare, teasing moods//

Unnecessary comma. They're hierarchical adjectives.

You use some form of "excite" five times in chapter four. All of these instances occur in the first two paragraphs.

>the gray earth pony//

This is even worse than using such a descriptor for Vinyl. Now Octavia's referring to herself. Who uses this kind of terminology about himself in his own thoughts?

>20//

Spell out numbers that short.

>“Oh, Octavia, deary,” Grandma Melody suddenly said with concern, “look at the time!//

You've got 4 paragraphs in a row that start: "Quote," she speaking-verbed, "rest of quote."

>whom she assumed she would learn the names of//

That's a really cumbersome phrasing. Try: "whose names she assumed she would learn."

>She was glad, too, that her family had started treating Vinyl better.//

This seems like it's supposed to be an important plot point, but you're completely glossing it over.

>you…” her voice trailed off//

An ellipsis already means trailing off, so narrating it is redundant.

>unsuspected//

I think "unexpected" is more the word you wanted here.

>flutists//

Usually, that's floutists. Well, I decided to second-guess myself, and sources tend to say "flutist" is more common in American English, though as much time as I've spent around serious musicians and being one myself, I've always heard "flautist" as far more prevalent, so maybe my experience is just skewed.

>whom often performed//

Who.

>the earth pony//

It's completely unnatural for her to refer to herself that way.

>and how she lost her career because of an accident that was completely not her fault//

It's an awful tease to hint at a very interesting piece of back story and never deliver on it.

>“Mrs. Harshwhinny?”,//

When you have other end punctuation, drop the comma, which wouldn't go outside the quotes anyway.

>the pony//

Another one of these very external references. They don't work in this narrative voice.

>I once had a tuba player come in for auditions and he remembered to bring everything except his tuba.”//

Needs a comma.

>I- I//

Don't leave a space in a stutter.

>Then Octavia rushed out the door//

And none of the ponies who came there with her immediately follow her to see what's going on?

>The sound of clopping feet became slower as the pony//

Another external reference, plus it's a very external way of her describing her own hoofsteps, like she's detached from them.

>A young filly//

If this is her memory, why is she describing it in such a detached way? It sounds like a newspaper account of it, not a flashback from someone invested in the event.

>she had said//

It's not obvious who this is. Presumably Octavia's mother, but the lead-in hasn't said Octavia's the younger one, plus the action hasn't focused on one of them yet, so it makes it ambiguous which one "she" is supposed to mean.

>It’s not a bad thing, actually, it’s very helpful for those not as inherently talented as you and I.//

Comma splice.

>clearly distraught//

In whose judgment? It's Octavia's reminiscence, so it can't be anyone but her, but she wouldn't be thinking that about herself. She'd be too busy actually being distraught to worry about whether she looks that way.

>“How dare you be such a fool//

Missing a line break here.

>And the likelihood of any of the Royal Orchestras hiring you after they hear of this event is slim to none.//

This seems very artificial and drummed up just to give the story some drama. What if Octavia had a family emergency and needed to go take care of a sick loved one? What if she'd already auditioned for other orchestras and had just heard back that she'd gotten into one that was more advantageous to her? I can't believe that they'd never fathom a reason why someone would ever decline, nor can I believe they'd blacklist her for it.//

>reason!!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty, and he's getting into what I mentioned. So this kind of thing actually has happened before. Why are they being so threatening, then? She's under no obligation to tell them her reasons.

>“Wha-?!!? How could you-?!? Octavia Melody, is this a joke?!!”//

All that punctuation is just ridiculous. One of each is fine.

>“Wait, what?!”

Note your quotation mark styles don't match. Don't italicize the closing set when the opening ones aren't. This isn't the only place you have this error.

>pulling out the band out//

Repetitive.

>“If leaving you to live on my own is the cost for being in some big symphony, then I don’t care what the payout is. It’s not worth it.”//

I'll refer to this later on, but I wanted to mark it for your attention.

>Back at Grandma Melody’s house, an old patchwork quilt sat on the couch in the basement, unharmed and ready to give warmth to anyone willing to use it.//

This is strange. I get the sentiment you're going for, but it's not like Octavia's thoughts are drifting to it. It's stated in a very detached manner, one sentence at the end of the story that doesn't flow from what came before. You just leeap location and narrative voice, and it comes out of nowhere. I'm also not quite sure why you have the quilt at Grandma's house, since it'd imply that she should know better or be receptive to Octavia's argument, if she sees the value in such a thing. This really needs a better segue.

You start the story in a very definite limited narrator using Octavia's perspective. Then you skip downstairs to say what's going on with Vinyl, which effects a jump in perspective. It's not like it was abrupt, so the fact you transitioned at all isn't the issue. But you only spent a paragraph with her before going back to Octavia. If it's important enough to go into Vinyl's head, it's important enough to stay there awhile. ALso note that if you want a limited narrator, you ought to have the narration express subjective things pretty regularly, or you risk having the narration revert to feeling omniscient. There are fairl long stretches where this is the case, like much of the conversation where Martha first shows up.

Look at your first few paragraphs as well. They keep saying the same things two or three times, sometimes even using repetitive word choice and phrasing. It's a bad idea anywhere in the story, but you don't want to create the immediate impression that the story's going to be repetitive and redundant.

Watch how often you directly identify character emotion. Here are two examples:
>a curious, wonder-filled look//
>Filled with a wave of anger.//
The three main ways authors do this are by using an emotion word as a noun (his excitement), adjective (the sad woman), adverb (he walked happily), or prepositional phrase (sighed in relief). It's more engaging to demonstrate emotion through how the characters appear and act, not by simply telling the reader how to interpret them. We normally read real people through behavioral cues, so it's more realistic to do so for written characters as well. You don't just know someone's sad. You see them cry, have a short temper, have bloodshot eyes, get distracted easily, etc., and conclude they're sad. Let the reader make these conclusions about the characters instead of telling them what the answer is. This not only gets the reader to identify more closely with the characters, but it creates richer visual images. I know what crying looks like. I don't know what "a curious, wonder-filled look" looks like. I can come up with something, but then you're making the reader do your job, and he's not seeing it as you might have imagined it, either. You want a little movie to play in the reader's head.

Okay, now getting back to that line I flagged to talk about later. You do have a theme and a conflict in this story, but they're not omnipresent enough to make the whole thing stick together that well.

Like I said, it's obvious Vinyl was upset, but it speaks to Octavia having a very casual relationship with her if she just shrugs it off and never asks Vinyl about it. Yet they both burst into tears at the thought of losing each other. It's very inconsistent. Frankly, we don't even have much evidence of how deep their friendship runs. We just have to take the story's word for it without ever seeing it in action. It's not the kind of story where you want to show them meeting for the first time and taking me up to the present so I can see all of their past together. But you've included a flashback, and that's one method for giving that back story to make the reader understand what all is involved in them being friends. Anecdote can also work well. It's closely related to flashback, but it just involves Octavia's mind wandering to times she'd spent with Vinyl instead of taking the reader back to see it happen "live." In short, if you want to hinge the story's power on them being such good friends then you need to demonstrate that to be the case before having it carry the emotional punch.

It's not even that clear what Octavia's giving up. You do have her act very excited about getting the invitation, and that's all well and good, but she passes the audition with seeming ease, so it's not even like she had to work for it. Easy victories don't mean much. She's nervous about whether she'll succeed, only to have one of the panelists gush about how nobody else has ever come close to her skill level. That's treading on Mary Sue territory. If she's good and has the confidence that results, it doesn't mean she never gets nervous, but it does mean she knows she's capable. But when she doesn't dare think she has a chance but blows the competition away, it's a fairly cliched conceit.

For that matter, when the panel was so incensed at being turned down. how does that reflect on Vinyl's friend or even Vinyl? They put themselves out there to recommend Octavia.

You wait fairly long to even bring the main conflict into the story. You do have the idea of patchwork and these poorer relatives near the beginning, but it's not until the end of the story that we see a connection between the two. I don't mean you need to spoil what Vinyl's gift is, but it'd give the story more coherence if you brought that plot thread about auditions in much sooner. Maybe not that Octavia's actually going to go do one, since she doesn't know that until she opens her gift, but just something about considering whether she could make it in a professional orchestra to show she has conflicted feelings about it and foreshadow that it's going to come up later.

I'm curious at the lack of reaction from Octavia about the fact that the audition was a gift. She only deals with the thoughts of not being able to leave Vinyl behind, and it never comes up that Vinyl was the one who instigated that. I'd expect Octavia would be touched Vinyl was willing to give up her friend so she could achieve her dream, or that Octavia would be angry Vinyl was willing to let their friendship go. As it is, she just forgets that's what started it all. Plus it goes back to my point of not getting a sense of how long or how much this has been a dream of Octavia's. How'd Vinyl even know about it? There's something that'd be good to have some anecdotes about.

There's a good story in here, but it's lacking some of the fine threads that keep it all attached together.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2663

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>ya'll//

Please don't be one of the people who can't spell this right.

>Apple Bloom found herself waving to her two friends//

The "found herself" construction implies the situation is unexpected or she can't remember how she got there. Neither would seem to be the case.

>Despite it having been a long day with the promise of summer drawing ever closer//

Set off the absolute phrase with a comma.

>the mare found herself//

No need to repeat why this phrase isn't ideal, but you also don't need to be repeating it so soon after. It's only one sentence later.

>She saw her friends wave back to her//

It'd already be implied she saw them just because the narrator said it. Pointing out she saw it tends to mean it'd be something hard to notice or that she was specifically keeping an eye out for it.

>all of them greeted by a foal in short//

I have no idea what you're trying to say here.
Edit: I figured it out later, but this is a really unclear way to say parents are there to pick up their kids.

>spotting the sight//

That's a horribly convoluted way of phrasing this. It's not even really accurate.

>smile she wore on her face faltered slightly when she approached her brother, Big Macintosh, who had a gentle smile on his face//

Repetitive phrasing about them both having smiles on their faces.

>Big Macintosh said with a smile//

You just got finished saying he smiled. Is he doing it again? What happened in between to change it?

>“Hey,” Apple Bloom tried to smile but it faltered slightly.//

You have that punctuated as a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>apparently reading her annoyance//

Who's the "her" this refers to? Afaik, Apple Bloom's the only female there. Even if you meant that to be a "his," you'd been telling the story from AB's viewpoint, yet the "apparently" isn't something she'd think about herself. She'd know whether it was true or not; "apparently" wouldn't enter into it.

>his brow being slightly raised//

This is your fifth use of "slightly" in just the last seven sentences.

>The foal//

And given that you're apparently using AB as your perspective character, why would she choose to refer to herself with this term? You don't call yourself "the person" in your own thoughts, do you?

>cheek, kicking lightly at the dirt as she felt her cheeks//

Repetition.

>this made her feel irritated//

Set this off with a comma. And instead of just telling me she's irritated, demonstrate it. What does she do? What sensations does it cause?

>this made her feel irritated//

>feel annoyance//
Yeah, this is going to be a problem. For the most part, you're going to get much more mileage out of demonstrating emotion than you will outright informing the reader of it. There a brief discussion of it in the "show versus tell" segment at the top of this thread.

>more often than not usually//

Redundant.

>It used to make Apple Bloom roll her eyes//

Needs a comma after this.

>He had been walking along her//

Missing a "with."

>ya'll//

In addition to the misspelling, it's fairly unusual to see an actual southerner use this as s singular term.

>‘bout//

The smart quotes in most word processors get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in the right way.

>with Big Macintosh laughed//

Verb form is off.

>just…” Big Macintosh trailed off.//

The punctuation already shows him trailing off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>His initially happy way of talking faded off as the sound of his footsteps was all that was heard.//

This doesn't make sense. Everything faded off, not just the happiness, but "initial" makes it sound like the happiness went away before his talking did, yet you describe them as going away at the same time, giving her no opportunity to hear anything but happiness.

>in thought. She tried to think, and then those thoughts faltered//

This really doesn't mean anything. There's no emotion attached to it, so it's just there. It doesn't make me understand anything about her.

>cause//

You need an apostrophe, since you're shortening "because."

>When Apple Bloom looked up to see his face//

Needs a comma to set off this dependent clause.

>he sighed loudly//

She just did the same thing two paragraphs ago.

>“Hey, Sugar, C’mere,” Big Macintosh nodded his head.//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>it usually made her feel anxious when she knew it was coming//

So how's it making her feel now? What images are going through her head, what physical sensations does it cause?

>pay the man//

Is... is this a human fic?

>a few small bowls//

Why is he carrying more than two?

>the heat of the air//

I'm not sure what it adds to attribute the heat to the air.

>“I don’t get it,” Apple Bloom shrugged.//

How do you shrug a sentence?

>thick rimmed//

Hyphenate.

>That had made Mac upset.//

How can she tell? What did he do?

>rough housing//

That's a single word.

>Apple Bloom could clearly remember Caramel apologizing//

This is your sixth use of "remember" in only four paragraphs.

>with the need to understand//

That's an odd thing to make eyes sting.

>It was real embarrassin’ for the two of us.//

Okay, this is coming across as a tad heavy-handed. It'd help to differentiate it from a general disapproval of PDA. Just because someone doesn't want to see ponies kissing doesn't mean they're homophobic. Nothing in AB's memory of what happened makes it clearly so.

>bout//

Needs an apostrophe.

>Big Macintosh sighed loudly//

Again?

>Y-Yeah//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>two stallion’s//

Lose the apostrophe.

>Our families real fine//

And that one actually should be a possessive, not a plural.

>“I…” Big Macintosh trailed off//

Redundant.

>Grown up’s//

Grown-ups

>When she had the courage to look back at him//

Needs a comma here.

>em//

Needs a leading apostrophe.

>other ponies business//

other ponies' business

>She felt a mix of emotions that were difficult to put to words.//

Well, try, or this is meaningless. The whole point of the story is to get me to feel what AB is feeling. It's like saying: "It was a dark and stormy night, and there was this brutal murder, but I can't tell you about it."

>nick name//

nickname

>You an’ AJ an Granny are all nice.//

You're still not differentiating that behavior. A random mare who complains isn't nice, but when Granny Smith makes the exact same complaint, she is nice. There's no reason for me to take the two differently unless you show me what's different about them. It sounds more like Big Mac's rationalizing than anything.

>Big Macintosh smiled, and nodded his head.//

The same subject is linked to both verbs, so you don't need the comma; it's all one clause.

>so fast that she almost choked on it. She found herself nearly dragging Big Macintosh into a run so fast//

Repeated phrasing.

>mid section//

midsection

>at least picked up speed by her request, or at least//

Repetition.

>Every thirty seconds//

As you've phrased it, this should be lower-case.

It seems odd that Big Mac had the opportunity to visit Caramel all along, and nothing's really changed, yet he's all excited to do so now and sure it'll work. It's not the most logical train of thought. Maybe if he attached more importance to having a thoughtful gift now, or that AB's presence will do something he alone couldn't?

>Caramel didn’t look like himself//

And you use "look" five times in this paragraph.

>what ar-”//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>She get’s it//

Extraneous apostrophe.

>Sugar Cube//

That's typically done as a single word in MLP context, and like Big Mac calling AB "sugar," they're generic terms of endearment, not actual nicknames, so they wouldn't be capitalized.

>Thanks, Apple Bloom. I feel better knowing that, I promise.//

And that disarms that this was that much of a problem to begin with. He can get over it just because she tells him to. If there's no struggle to resolve the conflict, that makes for a very bland story. That struggle is what gives the story its power. Otherwise, it's not going to stand out above all the other generic homophobia stories. Nothing really changed during the story. Big Mac's attitude sure didn't, and AB didn't either. They just go tell Caramel to feel better, he does, problem solved.

Strong ending there. That's a nice line to go out on.

The four biggest issues:

You repeatedly use non-speaking actions as dialogue tags.
You have lots of repetition.
You too often directly tell me how characters feel instead of getting me to interpret it from their behavior and appearance.
There's a really underwhelming conflict here that takes no effort to resolve.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2664

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>importance - weddings//

Hyphens are only for stutters or the kinds of compound words and phrases that use them. For asides and cutoffs, use a proper dash. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>A slow smile.//

Having a sentence fragment like this just doesn't fit. For one thing, this is pretty far into the story to start doing so. For another, your narration has sounded decidedly omniscient, and sentence fragments take on a conversational tone much more akin to a limited narration.

>clearly irritated with him//

You're wandering into a limited feel again. The narration is expressing an opinion here (clearly to whom?), but I have no idea which character's opinion it's supposed to represent, and the narrator hasn't been given any characterization or personality to treat them as a character anyway.

>the lemon-colored unicorn//

And assuming you want an omniscient narration, it's a little odd the narrator doesn't know these characters' names, but it's easy enough to let that slide for the sake of mystery.

>We can't just stand around here and discuss this in the city for much longer. The Queen will definitely want to hear about this. We haven't had an opportunity like this is a long time.//

It gets kind of repetitive that she refers to "this" in every sentence.

>had went unseen//

had gone

>Gone were the three ponies who had been discussing the wedding like everypony else//

If they were someone nobody else could see them, why were they in disguise? And why so dramatically cast off their disguises right now? It smack of narrative convenience instead of reasonable behavior.

>Her gaze focused on the blue-maned stallion//

But they changed. He's not blue-maned anymore, is he?

>destination. The Hive where their swarm resided.//

Another sentence fragment that doesn't play well with the narrative style you've established. I think it's work better if you made "the" lower-case and replaced the period with a colon or dash.

>Though,//

There's rarely a reason to put a comma after a conjunction. You don't need this one.

>A tilt of his head.//

Another fragment that doesn't quite fit.

>His speech was interrupted//

The punctuation already tells me this. It's redundant to narrate it as well, plus you don't want any delay between the cut-off speech and what did the cutting off.

>He too,//

You don't have to have that comma, but if you want it there, you need to pair it with another one before "too."

>also sporting a large helmet to signify himself as a lieutenant//

Odd that you're bringing in this piece of information now, since you never identified the one in the first group as a lieutenant. It's fairly immersion-breaking to force that fact in like this, though, since it's not presented in a way relevant to the action. If one of the characters addressed him as a lieutenant, that's a much smoother way of working it in.

>it was clear that there were a few differences from the changeling's in the first group//

Extraneous apostrophe, and another free-floating narrative opinion. Clear to whom?

>While their//

Their/there confusion, and it'd make things clearer if you set this off with a comma.
Edit: the way the sentence is worded, you actually need to remove "their" altogether.

>having took//

having taken

>rose into the air, rising//

Watch that close word repetition.

>while making sure that nopony was looking up at them to catch a glimpse of the mysterious creatures above//

Then why are they doing something as conspicuous as flying in full view? Why not stay disguised? Why not wait until night when they can't be seen?

>Caught up in their own intents, neither of the two assemblages had caught//

More close repetition.

>celebration. With//

Extraneous space.

>They had no reason or knowledge to report of any suspicious activity, certainly not another group of changelings from a Hive other than their own.//

Why would each assume they were the only hive to know about the wedding? That seems like poor strategy. Wouldn't they expect all the hives to want in on this? It's not like such a public event could be kept secret—in fact, everyone's taking great pains in quite the opposite direction—so why is there even a chance of a single hive being the only one to know?

>As the two separate groups of changelings flew off from Canterlot, green flames quickly encircled each one as they took on the forms of pegasi.//

Again, it's clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, but you're kind of backtracking here. The previous chapter already said they flew off but made zero mention of doing it in disguise. In fact, it said quite the opposite, that they shed their disguises and flew off while making sure nobody would see them like that.

>the two reigning changelings seemed to ignore the existence of each other completely//

Then why would it matter if the two scouting parties spotted each other?

>caverns once out of the entryway's light, the group continued on through the descending maze of caverns//

Watch the repetition.

>With a passing glance at the large statue, the four changelings sped down one of the caverns//

This is a serious hiccup in pacing. At least you're taking an omniscient voice, which excuses one error many authors make, and that's having a limited narrator dwell on a history lesson like this when the focus character wouldn't be able to spare the attention for it. But you don't have that problem. Still, this is a pretty conspicuous way to wedge in lots of exposition. You'd just started the chapter with this scouting party, showed them entering the Hive, then we spend a significant chunk of verbiage giving me lots of cultural back story before finally getting back to the action here. If you had a reason to go into this detail now, like one of the characters gazing at the statue for a while, that's one thing, but even in that case, you don't want to drop a wall of exposition. But you shut yourself out of doing even that by explicitly saying none of them gave the statue anything more than a glance.

>The lieutenant turned and held up a hoof to silence any interruption from his three companions, making sure that the wedding notice was secured tightly in the hold of his armor.//

Why does he silence them? You don't mention any of them even beginning to formulate an interruption. Any why is the wedding notice so important? The king wouldn't trust an oral report of it? Without that proof, nothing would come of it?

>a set of powerful wings that, like his subjects, held the appearance of a bird of prey//

This says his subjects held the appearance of birds of prey, not that their wings did. If hat's what you meant, make "subjects" a plural possessive.

>The King's green-blue eyes//

You just said what color his eyes were a couple paragraphs back. In fact, you called them "blue-green" then.

>appearing to take an interest//

Right after you introduced the king, you seemed to be taking a shallow limited narrative voice in his perspective, though I'm betting you wanted it to remain omniscient. Here, though, you're very external to him, since he'd know if he was taking an interest. The "appearing" is a subjective thing, though, so even as omniscient, this goes back to the same thing I'd pointed out before of the narration expressing opinions unattached to any character.

>"Her talent is... love?"//

It seemed like he recognized both the bride and groom, so why wouldn't he already know this?

>To have love be her power, the most powerful emotion known to changeling kind...//

And now you're taking a very conversational tone. You keep wavering between a limited and an omniscient feel. It's not going to be worth having me point out every single instance of it, so I'll just make that a blanket statement and say you need to scan the story for this.

>The one who had spoken was the changeling from before who had claimed that the young princess was pretty.//

No way is a reader going to remember which one this was. It's also definitely not in the king's perspective anymore, since he wasn't there to see that happen.

>about to comment about//

>allowed the rectangular lock to move out of its holding place, allowing//
Repetition.

>something she considered a serious manner//

Seems like you meant "matter" there.

>voice laden with curiosity//

It's a little off-putting to have emotions directly identified for me than letting me deduce them from character behavior and appearance, but you just told me she was curious one paragraph ago.

>"It must be something important if you are delivering the message."//

The narration pretty much already covered this.

>for bring//

Typo.

>Yet, she felt her mind traveling back to her early days//

No need for that comma.

>7//

Write out numbers that short.

>She'd show this Prince Meta-what's-his-name who was the better changeling.//

That's definitely vocalizing Chrysalis's thoughts as narration, but other places in this scene can't be, like saying she looked more confident and referring to herself as "the young princess."

>8-year-old//

Write out the number.

>This first meeting wasn't going at all the way they had hoped.//

And now you seem to be inhabiting some collective viewpoint of the parents. The perspective sure bounces around a lot.

>study horn//

I'm guessing you meant that to be "sturdy"?

>using the changeling word for "crazy"//

Why are we just now learning they speak another language? And why would he only be using single words of it?

When you have italicized words (or words in regular font in italicized passages), have a question mark or exclamation mark be in the same font as the word it's on.

>having been tricked by Chrysalis defying the pattern.//

You're way over-explaining this. The reader's seen this gag before.

>marked the marked the//

Repeated phrase.

>While the young changeling's were neck and neck//

That's the second time you've made this a possessive when it should be a plural. Not sure why.

>I can fly better"//

Missing end punctuation.

>Take that Princess//

Missing comma for direct address.

>crashed headfirst into a bush of thick brambles, causing him to crash//

So the crash caused him to crash?

>Just before their parents took off with the two of them into//

Did you mean to say "in tow"?

I'm going to stop here after chapter 2 since even if the rest were perfect, I'd still want to see these early chapters fixed up. Though it's more likely the same problems will persist throughout. There's a fair amount of repetition, some overly blunt informing me of character emotion, and at least one very obtrusive infodump, along with some assorted editing problems, but the biggest issue is that there needs to be some unity of perspective. It constantly waffles between an omniscient and limited voice, and while limited, it abruptly changes between different characters, too. It ends up making everything feel disjointed.

Another concern we have is the update schedule. There's nearly a two-year gap between the last two chapters posted, and there hasn't been another chapter in over two years. We won't post stories that we suspect will never finish or will be overly slow in updating, since readers won't be able to follow it. They'll either never see it completed or long since forget the details of what happened when it actually does update.

WufflyTimeCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2666

>>2659
I reallly appreciate you taking the time to give me feedback on my story.

The humans in the story are there as outsiders, to have the weird world explained to them. However, to get the plot moving, I reallocated them to later chapters. This was a terrible decision on my part.

As for the Dutch-German-intelligibility issue, I compared Dutch and German sentences to see if they were similar. If they weren't, I presumed Rarity wouldn't understand.

As for the spelling of 'Nachtkönigin', I wanted to write the easier to pronounce 'Nachtskönigin' but my dictionary always gave examples of Nacht- without the additional 's' e.g. Nachtdienst, Nachteule, Nachtfalter, Nachtmensch, Nachtschwester etc.

I will, of course, go back and look into the mistakes you pointed out.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2669

>>2666
I apologize at taking so long to respond, as I thought I had checked this thread much more recently that I had.

So, first, I did find this an engaging story despite my confusion, and that's nothing to sneeze at. Really, that's all an author can hope to do: keep the reader interested in what happens next. And you've got that. It just takes pushing through a lot of material to get there, material which is unclear as to what it means or if it'll ever be explained.

Your plan to get to why the humans are there earlier is a good one, and I urge you to state as early as possible that the central conflict is that a human has been killed. That makes the humans' presence immediately relevant, which is the perfect time to sneak in a little back story as to why they're in Equestria. It's hard, but if you can come up with thoughts Rarity would have about the situation or dialogue between her and whoever else is there that feels natural yet illustrates this back story, that's the ideal way to work it in.

All of those words with "Nacht-" at the beginning... the endings have different genders, but "teule" should be feminine like "königin." Interesting that none of those words have an adjective ending. Maybe because "Nacht-" is a noun adjunct instead of an adjective? The only one I remember this way is resistance group, "Widerstandsgruppe," and the entire class was flummoxed as to why that "s" got added there, since we figured it should be an "e" if anything. But here, "Widerstand" is also a noun adjunct to a feminine noun, so... I don't get it. But you have a pattern there, so you're probably correct.

If you have any further questions, please ask. I would love to see this story succeed.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2671

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>But the lives of its people, particularly one Anna Erklass, faces irrevocable change//
Number mismatch: people faces.

Story:
>Winter has come//
Why the switch to present tense?

Please use proper dashes for asides and cutoffs, not hyphens.

>lest it drew//

"Lest" phrasings use present tense. Actually, they use subjunctive mood, essentially an infinitive form, but present tense is easier to explain.

>doubled down//

"Doubled over" would be a more familiar phrasing. What you had is more widely recognized as a blackjack play.

>The doe//

You're definitely using a limited narrator, since you express her thoughts directly as narration. Pay attention to the implications of your word choices, then. You're asserting that she'd describe herself in her internal thoughts as "the doe." People just don't think of themselves so externally. I take it you're withholding her name as some sort of reveal, but again, consider what's implied by your limited narrator doing so. It means she's avoiding revealing her identity even to herself, in her own thoughts. Why would she avoid the subject? This is a fairly advanced topic, but there are lots of little details that cascade out of how you decide to tell a story, and this is the kind of baggage that comes with a limited narrator. Any choices have pluses and minuses, and you ought to work within those. You make references like this in the first chapter, too.

>without mercy nor compassion//

This is actually an "or" phrasing unless you want to say "with neither mercy nor compassion."

>who she had failed//

whom

>whose purpose are yet to be revealed//

You have a plural verb with a singular subject.

>the pair of foals she protects//

Why the switch to present tense?

>their gaze were fixed//

>Reindeer magic were//
More singular/plural mismatches.

>the doe could hear//

>she could see//
Besides being a repetitive phrasing so close together, it's rarely necessary for a limited narrator to say what the focus character heard or saw. The narrator effectively is the character, so it's already implied the character can see or hear whatever the narrator mentions. Conversely, a limited narrator can't describe things the focus character can't perceive. It's only worth using perception verbs like this when you want to emphasize that it's something most characters wouldn't notice or that the character was specifically keeping an eye/ear out for it.

>It was once one star a week or two ago, before a split occurred, and the star was forever split in two.//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean, and there's nothing here to give it any sense of importance.

>It was then, that the doe looked down upon the sisters, and realised then that it was their sign//

That first comma just has no reason to be there. The second one's unnecessary, too, and you've been using a fair amount of them in the same situation. You only need one with a conjunction when there are separate clauses, but here, the same subject is linked to both verbs. There's also a repetitive "then" phrasing.

>Lilja has done her duty, and will soon resume her duties//

Repetitive.

>which could shatter at anytime//

"Any time" and "anytime" aren't interchangeable. An adverb doesn't parse here; you need it to be two words.

>day.” Sint said//

Punctuation.

>humility, and//

Extraneous space.

>merry, yet sad smile//

You don't need that comma, but if you want it, pair it with another after "yet sad."

At the beginning of the first chapter, look how often you use direct address. Many authors do this. It's just unnatural. If there is a large group conversing, it can be necessary to make sure the right person is listening, but in general people just don't do this that much, especially when there are only a couple people. Here, you have only two; there's no question about who is speaking to whom. In this case, people only use direct address for emphasis, but you're emphasizing things so much that it loses its effectiveness. Five of the first six paragraphs use direct address.

>But she was already gone.//

This is a little off with the perspective. The narrator's been voicing Anna's thoughts for her as a limited narrator. The two are essentially one and the same. So if Anna's already left, how can the narrator know what Erklass replied?

>where the were no trees//

Typo.

>As the wind howled against the mountainside, in a moment, Anna forgot her grievances with her grandfather, laughing as she gracefully leapt off the walkway and into the open air.//

It's pretty clunky to have multiples of certain elements in a sentence, like your two "as" clauses here. Not only does it get repetitive, but these (along with participles and absolute phrases) synchronize things, so it starts to lump a lot of actions ontop of each other, often to the point they couldn't actually happen simultaneously.

>as she gave herself up to the pull of the earth, letting it take her where it would... yet confident of her capacity to determine her own fate, as the air currents brushed lightly upon the soles of her outstretched hooves//

And this is in the next paragraph. You're definitely abusing the "as" clauses and participial phrases. I did a Ctrl-f on " as " (including the spaces to make sure I got it as a single word), and you have 58 of them in this chapter. That's a lot of times to use this structure. Sure, not all of them are used in this sense, but try it yourself. Do a search on " as " and watch the screen light up. Also notice how they tend to occur in clusters

>filled the city, immense pines and firs, filled//

Watch that close repetition.

You're inconsistent at times how you format thought. You have it italicized in places, in single quotes in others, and sometimes only tagged with a thought attribution.

>brushing away a strand of reddish-brown mane/

Given it's her perspective, it seems odd for her to comment on her own hair color, unless it's different than what she's used to.

>evening, shimmering//

Extraneous space.

>“Oh, hello, sis!”//

When effectively used as names, family relations get capitalized, so it'd be "I went with Sis," but "I went with my sis."

>I am//

Extraneous space.

>And really, sis//

Capitalization.

>One of them, one with a pure white coat//

Redundant use of "one."

>but on second thoughts//

I've only ever seen that phrased as singular.

>W-ho?//

I have no idea how that's supposed to sound. Do you actually have her pronouncing the "w"?

>satdown//

Typo.

>“Say,” Anna said//

Given her piece of dialogue, that's kind of a repetitive choice of speaking verb.

>“I…” Anna said, trailing off//

An ellipsis already means trailing off, so narrating such as well is redundant. The same would go for pointing out an interruption or cutoff when you'd used a dash.

>Twas’//

Why is that apostrophe there? What missing letters would come there?

>Luna, the dark-coated one//

>the white-coated child, Celestia//
As long as they've been in the story already, you don't need to keep specifying which one is which.

>in askance//

I've never seen anyone use "in" with that word.

>old, greying mare//

I get the picture. At every opportunity, you tell me she's old. It's gone past repetitive and into grating.

>Her sister flashed a look of concern//

You're doing this an awful lot in this chapter: outright telling me how characters feel. This has the effect of being more abstract and thus less relatable. The point is to make the story lifelike, as if the reader were standing there witnessing it. So how can you tell someone's concerned? It's not something you can observe directly. It's something you interpret from how the person acts and looks. So how do people behave such that you would deduce they were concerned? Have her do those things. It's like the difference between saying someone was happy and saying they smiled. One just feeds me an abstract conclusion, while the other gets me to see the evidence and draw my own conclusion, just like I would with a real person.

>a look of sadness//

I've been glossing over lots of these, but I want to point out the four main ways authors get too blunt with emotion: saying it as a noun (his sadness), adjective (he was happy), adverb (he grinned excitedly), or putting it in a prepositional phrase (sighed in relief). You're mostly doing that last one, and it's the most extraneous kind, since it almost always is redundant with information already in the sentence. The excerpt I've made here isn't redundant, but it's still a far too blunt way of communicating sadness.

>How could I forget your fondness for these, sister//

Capitalization.

>miss, if/

Extraneous space.

>‘smack!’//

Putting sound effects in the narration like this tends not to work with serious stories. They belong more in comedies or children's stories.

>journey."//

You must have done your editing in more than one place. You mostly use fancy-style quotation marks, but you have simple ones here. I haven't been paying attention, so I don't know if you have simple ones elsewhere, but you should sweep the story to make them consistent.

>stacked with, she gasped, a few slices of chocolate cake//

That's really strange to punctuate that aside with commas. It reads like you're trying to make it a speech attribution. It'd do much better with dashes.

>freshly-grown//

Two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb don't take hyphens, since none of the hierarchy of what modifies what is ambiguous.

>looked over them, a kind look//

Watch the repetition.

>What ith us around//

Typo.

>as light//

Extraneous space. You should probably do a search for double spaces to make sure you catch all these.

>In all honesty, cousin//

Capitalization.

And now that we've gotten yet another character introduced, namely Platinum, I'll say that several of your characters tend to run together. Anna and Elsa don't have very distinctive personalities. We don't know too much about them yet, but personality also comes through character voice, and their dialogue sounds so similar that I wouldn't be able to tell them apart without speech tags saying who was speaking. Adding in that limited narration reflects personality as well, I've now got Lilja, Anna, Elsa, and Platinum who all lack distinctive voices. Sint didn't speak too much, so it's hard to gauge him yet, and Firefly was unique, but the rest aren't very distinguishable. What can you do o give them little quirks and mannerisms? Play them off each other, have each react to these quirks to highlight them in the reader's eye. This is a bit of an exaggeration, but ideally, you would only have to tag dialogue for each character once, and their voices would stand out so much that it would never be in question which one was speaking. I realize they're all royals so far, which at least explains why they all use a formal tone, but they all use the identical formal tone.

>newly-tailored//

No hyphen/

>red-blue-and-yellow//

red, blue, and yellow

>a symbol of the future that awaits Equestria//

Not sure why you broke from past tense here.

>paused - with a knowing smirk//

Use a dash.

Sledge115Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2674

>>2671
Hey, mate, thanks for the time taken to review my story.

First off, I've always had the nagging feeling of repetition in my writings, but until now I didn't realise it was the repeated use of 'as'!

Massive thanks for the character voices tips, I suppose it's something rather noticeable now that I'm going through all of the bits of dialogue.

Overall, though, the problem I'm having with character voices lies in the fact that I'm struggling to balance the formal, royal tones with their characterisations. Anna, for example, is much like her namesake, except a tad bit more formal, and there the line sort of blurs between formal and casual and of course, avoiding anachronisms.

The email mentioned back from Mars. Do I try to resubmit it as 'back from mars'?

At the end of it, I cannot state enough how thankful I am for the feedback. Cheers!

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2677

>>2674
Yes, one of the pull-down menus on the submission form is whether the story is a new or returning submission, and one of the choices has language about it being back from Mars. Use that one, as it helps flag it as something that's largely problem-free, and it won't require as much scrutiny.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2678

>every Hearth’s Warming with my grandparents, on the Northern coast. We would take the ferry to get there, which traveled up and down the coast every day. But the ferry left our hometown at 4 AM. So every//
Watch the repetition. It's possible you're doing this deliberately to create an effect, but it doesn't feel like it. You have three uses of "every" in just four sentences.

>me and my older sister//

At her age, and the formality implied by having her write this for an audience, I think she'd know to say "my older sister and I."

>dad wouldn’t hear of it//

When you essentially use a family relation as a name, capitalize it. So, for example, it'd be "there's Mom" but "there's my mom."

>house on the coast was a big, beautiful house//

Watch the repetition.

>And every year when we came to visit//

Normally, you'll want to set off a dependent clause like this with a comma.

>mane almost like a lion’s mane//

>endured us with feline grace, such as a long-suffering monarch of the forest might endure//
Some individual instances would be fine, but in the aggregate, you don't want this much repetition showing up in your story.

>Anypony else who tried it would feel her displeasure.//

It's very vague what this means. I assume you mean the cat's displeasure and not the granny's, but even so, how do you feel that? The cat just was restless? Or she'd attack you?

>Not that I had ever noticed before//

And this is the 3rd paragraph in a row to use "notice."

>But on this day when my granny’s cat was gone//

Another spot where you need a comma to set off a dependent clause.

>or if they were there because now that my granny’s cat was gone that meant it was finally safe for the rest of them to come out//

Hm. Especially since we've been set up for this as a Nightmare Night story, I wonder if it wouldn't occur to her the cats might be there to threaten whoever had the old cat put to sleep. May it'll play out that way...

>I pushed the paper aside, and turned to look out the window at Ponyville in autumn.//

This is the opposite issue. You've done this several times now, but it was justified. This one doesn't feel that way, though. It's all a single clause—the same subject does both verbs—so it doesn't need a comma.

>The next morning I left my sister’s house, and locked the front door behind me.//

No comma needed.

>I would never tell her that, but…//

This is far more a speech affectation. People trail off as they speak, and it requires no extra effort. It does take a deliberate effort to put an ellipsis on the page, though, and you're representing this as something she's written, not something she's narrating. So really consider if it adds something to have this and if it's really reasonable for her to do this. It's one of those things that often doesn't work in stories that are supposed to be journals or letters or other articles of writing. Another is dialogue. By the time people write something down, there's no way they could remember entire conversations word for word enough to present them as quotations. A few lines that stuck in their mind, sure, which is why you're still fine here, since you've had very little dialogue, still well within what she could remember reasonably. Though because of the manner she's writing this, I could see her hamming it up a bit in a way she wouldn't with something more limited in audience.

>fit in//

This is really going to depend on how you envision this writing. If she's published it as a book, then italics are fine here. I kind of get the sense that's what this is supposed to be. But if you intend this to be handwritten, I think italics don't work. How would you differentiate them from normal font? One's printed and one's cursive? When people want to emphasize something handwritten, they more typically underline it, darken it (essentially bold font), or write it in all caps. So just go with whatever works for the delivery medium you envision here.

Okay, you're getting into an awful lot of dialogue in this scene. I assume this isn't "live," but still something she's written. If she means it as a story, that's fine, but if she's writing it up as a formal account of what happened to her, it's not coming across as authentic.

>one of a kind librarian//

You're using "one of a kind" as a single modifier right in front of what it describes, so hyphenate it.

>Hi, Sweetie Belle!//

Compare this to a few paragraphs back where you had: "Hi Sweetie!" It's a quick enough instance that I won't grumble too much about using the comma for direct address, but since you're willing to, you might as well in both places.

>Belle!” She said//

Capitalization.

>And yet, only ponies have cutie marks.//

It's rare for a comma to be justified after a conjunction. You don't need this one.

>Twilight cast a spell and the map on her table came to life.//

Needs a comma.

>entire planet, along with the sun and the moon. The entire//

Watch the repetition.

>Me and my friends spent so many hours in that wood//

Again, I think she's old enough to know that should be "my friends and I."

>And yes, that includes cats. But there’s a difference there.//

You have a bunch of single-line paragraphs here, and there's no dialogue or quick action. Such things are usually reserved for special emphasis, but when everything is emphasized, effectively nothing is. It suggests you're probably not giving enough description or aren't organizing things very well.

>Cats, I think we can all agree, have destiny in spades.//

Where's this coming from? I don't see her justification for saying it, much less her assurance that I'll agree.

>and when she smiled//

Needs a comma after the dependent clause.

>Hi Fluttershy//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>“Oh, no. I was just going out to do a little weeding. Hold on.” She turned and poked her head behind the door. “It’s just Sweetie Belle! I’ll be just a minute.”//

"Just" is a word many authors tend to overuse. You have three of them in this short excerpt. You have 42 total in the story, which is fairly high for this length a story. It's not awful, but like many authors, it's not only the raw total, but that they occur in clumps. If you do a Ctrl-f for it, look how they get clustered, so even if it's not too repetitive over the whole story, it still is locally.

>Her face lit up with a huge grin and her eyes seemed to shimmer.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>a rare moment of anger//

>a little cry of frustration//
It's usually best to demonstrate emotion than inform of it, unless it's a fleeting thing that doesn't matter much to the story. This is one of the worst kinds, where you have an "in/with/of mood" phrasing, because it's almost always redundant with a behavior already mentioned. In any case, think about how you would know a stranger you saw in public was angry or frustrated. When the reader has to interpret the same cues he would in real life to deduce an answer, it comes across as much more authentic.

>Fluttershy nodded excitedly.//

>Fluttershy continued happily.//
And using these emotion adverbs has the same effect.

>There were hoofsteps and Discord appeared in the doorway himself.//

Needs a comma.

>possibly-former//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases beginning in an -ly adverb. There's no ambiguity in the modifiers.

>thank you my dear//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>As I left Carousel Boutique//

Set off this dependent clause with a comma.

>cats, unlike ponies, never have any doubts about who and what they are//

Hm. Surely not all ponies have doubts. I have to think there are some who are convinced from an early age what their talent will be, and they turn out to be right.

>A very old mare opened the door and peered out at me.//

Watch the repetition. This is the 4th straight sentence with a "... and ..." structure.

>a cat jumped up and laid down across her lap//

Lay/lie confusion. You usually get these verbs right, which is no small feat.

>see it from their point of view, I could see//

Watch the repetition.

>nooks and crannies to hide and chase//

That phrasing is off. How do you hide a nook? Or chase a cranny?

>looking ahead to her own inevitability//

How would Sweetie Belle know this before Goldie even spoke? She's reading Goldie's mind. But it's also over-explaining what the dialogue says anyway.

>scrap book//

That's one word.

>Leaving the book on her lap//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>She closed the book shut//

How else would you close it?

>aint//

Missing apostrophe.

>miss… Bell//

Since she's attaching it to a name, "Miss" would be capitalized.

>everypony had adorned their masks and costumes to become something else//

I think you meant something closed to donned. Adorned means they decorated their masks.

>who don’t yet know//

Not sure why you went to present tense here, as the rest of her action is past tense.

>Tonight was the night the monsters walk among us as our friends, and everypony gets to look into the darkness and see themselves there, reflected as in a mirror.//

You're mixing tenses again. That story at large is in past, and while it's okay to make a present-tense statement to represent an ongoing condition that's still true, you'd have to make the whole statement present tense. And this doesn't feel like a situation that warrants such.

>you’d be surprised at how many of those there were, unless of course you knew my sister//

I just wanted to tag this, because it ties into a comment I made early on about whether this is supposed to feel like something she's written or if it's supposed to be a standard narration. In standard narration, it's a bad idea to address the reader, unless you're going to do so consistently throughout the story and establish why it's being done that way. And having this as something she's written would establish it, so that'd explain why she's doing so, if that's what you intended. I'll come back to this at the end.

>and when I turned and looked at her//

Needs a comma here.

>I didn’t want them to put you to sleep as well just because my sister wasn’t here to take care of you.//

I didn't get this sense, though. You wouldn't put a cat to sleep just for that. It seemed more like the prior cat was put to sleep because it wouldn't tolerate anyone else, to the point it'd get violent, so nobody else could take care of it. Opal's not that way. She's not hostile toward everyone, particularly Fluttershy. So putting Opal to sleep wouldn't be the only option. I'm surprised it even came up as a possibility. Or maybe it didn't come up, but then why mention it now? The way it's phrased, it sure sounds like it had been discussed.

>great-grand-children//

great-grandchildren

>She turned back to me and the emotions in her eyes were pony emotions.//

Needs a comma, but this is just a strange sentence. It's awkwardly phrased, and it's infuriatingly vague. There are reasons for emotions that may be more attributable to sentient creatures, but the same emotions exist.

>she said quietly//

Your last dialogue tag was "she said softly," which is fairly repetitive, plus you have a lot of paragraphs lately that begin with "dialogue," she said.

>I hesitated, and nodded.//

No comma.

>but, I must be going//

Another comma after a conjunction that shouldn't be there.

Okay, at the end. I liked the story. But I'm still not sure what you want it to be. Take the bit that even precedes the story:

"A Nightmare Night Tail"

The cutesy pun tells me that it's supposed to be fluffy. Fair enough. Your choice of specifically linking it to Nightmare Night versus just having it happen to take place then sure makes it sound like you mean it to be spooky, but the use of "tail" immediately disarms that. You're sending mixed signals, but that's a minor thing. Now the biggie:

"by Sweetie Belle"

This one threw me for a loop. As I said before, there are only certain scenes that actually read as if this is an account meant to inform. She would have written it long after the conversations would have occurred, yet she presents them as quoted dialogue, and that just isn't plausible. On the other hand, if she meant this more as a bit of entertainment with some insight, like an essay she might submit to a magazine, for instance, that's more excusable, since she's just trying to reconstruct it as best she can. Some authors might even explicitly have her say it's her best recollection and not necessarily an exact account.

That just adds to an overall feel of inconsistency. She addresses the reader in some places but not in others, which makes her waver on whether she has an expected audience and who that audience might be. Then we have Goldie Delicious, Discord, and Fluttershy acting evasive and appearing to know more than they let on, as if this is some great secret. It's unclear whether Goldie and Fluttershy actually know, maybe just that they suspect there's a larger truth they can't quite grasp, but Discord knows. More to the point, all three of them act like this is more than a simple secret, that it's something they're reluctant to let her know. I never got a picture of why that might be, because Sweetie Belle sure didn't treat it as any sort of forbidden knowledge once she found out. To wit, she's writing it up for anyone to read. Don't the cats care if this becomes public?

Getting back to that subtitle, having it be so generic-sounding doesn't mesh with her revealing some great truth. It kind of reduces it all to a banality, but I can't believe she'd use her own dead sister so flippantly in a spooky story, so I'm left thinking she wrote it in earnest. Yet she doesn't quite make a point out of it. Knowing cats have these abilities and philosophies is one thing, but the very emotional event of seeing her sister one more time is at best tangential to that, and yet that's the big splash that's begging to carry the story's message. So the message gets a bit muddled. Here's where I'm at a bit of a loss. I wouldn't advocate excising that powerful moment, but how to tie it back in with the theme? Maybe just before Rarity smiles back, have a brief epiphany where Sweetie Belle gets the full impact of how the cats not only serve as guardians of life, but ushers to the rest that comes after, and she picks up her new little guardian with a feeling that as long as the cat is around, she'll share an unbreakable connection with Rarity until she sees her again for good. Maybe. I'm just spitballing here, but keeping the story's theme focused and coherent like that will strengthen what it's saying.

I see at least one commenter complaining that the prose style changed from beginning to end, and I see what he's talking about, though I wouldn't necessarily call it a problem. The early story has more of the non-dialogue scenes, and you're more descriptive in those. In contrast, the last scene has fairly terse narration. It's fine for narrative tone to change as suits the mood, but part of that is also going to be tied in to how I'm to take the story. As something written after the fact for a literary audience, I'd think she'd keep up a more consistent tone throughout, since she's had plenty of time to organize her thoughts before writing it, and she'd be in a more stable mindset. If, however, I'm to take the narrative scenes as what she's written and the conversational scenes as "live" or flashbacks (which, related to what I said about the plausibility of quoted dialogue, are more typically how such a thing would be presented), then it's really only the written scenes that need a consistent tone, which they already have. The conversational ones would actually occur over larger skips in time, not just the few evenings it took her to pen the account, plus it would put her in the moment of the emotions involved, making a tonal shift more authentic.

Honestly, I think removing the subtitle and author credit would solve almost all of the problems. What difference would it make if we're to see this as a standard narrative than as a document? A little less unusual format, sure, but it doesn't change the meaning of any of it, and it divests you of a lot of the incongruities in format I've been talking about. The only additional thing to turn it back into a regular story is to reword the few places you address the reader.

When you have Sweetie Belle actually writing something, then we have to question her motivation. Why does she want to write it? What does that accomplish? I don't get a sense of that. As a normal story, it's enough to say these events happen and leave the reader to derive meaning from it (and it's perfectly fine for that to still be in first person), but for her to commit it to paper shows that she thinks there's something in there that other ponies should learn from it, yet she never says anything of the sort. It lacks the kind of conclusion that would make it authentic as a character-authored piece, because it's a lot of trouble to write all this out if she has no purpose in doing it. Yet she never expresses a purpose. Plus it gets back to my point about why she thinks it's okay to reveal what she learned when everyone else acted as if it wasn't okay. Even Discord warned her about it, then she called him dangerous, which never turned into anything. That was kind of a Chekhov's Gun to set up tension there that subsequently went absent.

To be frank, this almost works as a standard story, but if you really want it to be something Sweetie Belle's written, it needs more thought put into how it's being presented, both with how much of it is supposed to actually be her writing and whether she's doing this as a bit of persuasive writing or just something with entertainment value, not to mention making it clear which of those attitudes she holds. I enjoyed it, and I'd like to see it succeed. If you have any questions, please ask, either here or through the email thread.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2682

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

So I see you're starting with the weather. That's a very common thing to do, and it makes it a lot harder for your story to stand out. The weather isn't even important to the plot, so not only is it a cliche, it doesn't even matter much. You've got interesting ideas for plot and characterization in this story. Get right to them. Start with something revealing about a character, or drop us right into some action.

>Once all the apples had been gathered, Mac pulled the cart over to the next tree, then repeated the process once//

I know they're meant in different senses, but try to avoid close word reptition like this for all but the most mundane of words.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>He bucked the tree and a bombardment of apples fell into the cart.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, since each subject gets its own verb.

>Sweetie gave me her half of her sandwich during lunch//

That first "her" really changes the meaning to one I think you didn't intend.

>ok//

It's preferred to spell that out as "okay."

>Applebloom tilted her head, confused//

The furrowed brow and tilted head already paint a picture of confusion. There's no need to short-circuit that picture by telling me it's confusion.

>spotting her//

This is similar. It's obvious from what she says that she spotted Lily. You don't need to explain every detail.

>as she raised as hoof//

Typo.

>here says you're new here//

Watch the repetition.

>A-About//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>Peering down at his sister, the rightmost corner of Big Mac's mouth curled upward.//

This says the corner of his mouth is peering down at Apple Bloom.

>ungrit//

The past tense would be "ungritted."

>axle to one of the cart's wheels had rusted shut//

I'm not sure what this means. How would an axle be open in the first place?

>personally maintained the farm's equipment himself//

The "personally" and "himself" are redundant.

>with a sense of urgency//

Don't tell me this. Demonstrate it. What does she do that makes her appear urgent?

>the yellow filly straightened to attention to the call of her name//

Two things here. First, here's how to format a narrative aside in a quote:
Applebloom—" the yellow filly straightened to attention to the call of her name "—help
That's if he stops speaking while that action happens. It actually seems here like he wouldn't. In that case, the dash placement moves outside the dialogue:
Applebloom"—the yellow filly straightened to attention to the call of her name—"help
And the other thing: Big Mac knows Apple Bloom very well. Why would he refer to her as "the yellow filly"? You're using a limited narrator in Big Mac's perspective, since the narrator speaks his thoughts for him. So this would also be his thought. You wouldn't think of a brother or sister in such abstract terms, would you?

>to-go//

For how you've used this, you don't need the hyphen.

>his mind processing everything that had occurred//

This is so vague as to mean nothing. It's pretty clear what he's doing anyway. You don't need this here.

>referring to the house just down the road//

You're over-explaining things again. Just say the house is there, and the reader will make the connection.

At this point, I wonder why Lily has suddenly lost her shyness.

>hussle//

hustle

>There was also the fact that it's been years//

it'd

>two fillies, who looked back and forth between the two//

Repetition.

>B...Big//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>relief washing over him//

He's the limited narrator, Let me know how this feels, both physically and what mental imagery he has. This is a great place to use simile or metaphor to create a vivid picture of the emotion without having to name it.

>Mendy?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's customary to italicize an exclamation mark or question mark on it as well. You did it right earlier.

>The mare turned to Big Mac//

This is similar to having Big Mac's narration refer to Apple Bloom as "the yellow filly." He knows Mendy well. Why would he use such an abstract descriptor for her in his own thoughts?

>'cause I sure as horseshoes don't recognize her.//

Capitalization.

>Paw Mend look down to her//

Typo.

>why don't you two come inside and make yourselves comfortable.//

That's a question, isn't it?

>the stallion looking back at her with a pensive look on his face//

Now I have no idea whose perspective you're in. Big Mac wouldn't call himself "the stallion," and he wouldn't be able to see the expression on his own face.

>she looked over her whither//

You've confused "whither" with "withers."

>his old friend//

See, now this is the kind of descriptor that actually makes sense, since this is one way he'd think of her. You generally want to keep to name pronouns, or terms descriptive of relationships between the characters, if they know each other.

>See you're still wearing that yoke//

>Mac pawed curiously at the yoke around his neck//
That's not really a yoke. It's a horse collar.

>with a mortified expression//

Describe it. It means a lot more if I witness it than if I hav to take the narrator's word for it that it was mortified.

>a might awkward//

mite

>she had to clear her throat before finishing with//

Capitalize this.

>what?//

Italicize the question mark, too.

>From the way Big Mac stiffened his shoulders and avoided eye contact, she could tell his parents wasn't something he liked to bring up.//

>Somehow sensing the change in atmosphere, the mare smiled, yet her ears folded back.//
The first statement is from Mendy's perspective, and the second is from Big Mac's. See how the perspective is wandering back and forth? It should stay more consistent than that. It is possible to shift it in the middle of a scene, but rarely more than once. You don't want to keep jumping around.

>S-Seven//

Only capitalize the first one. You get this right intermittently.

>Her eyes were red and puffy//

Why? That usually means she's been crying, but he would have noticed that before.

>'cause I do.//

Capitalization.

>Less, of course//

Needs an apostrophe, since you're shortening "unless."

>We both would have had to give up on our dreams to raise our child//

Huh? He couldn't work on the farm? His parents seemed to manage okay.

>Didn't have the heart, or the courage to do so.//

So what did Mendy tell her? Who does she think her dad is? And why would that be preferable to knowing it was Big Mac?

>N-No//

Capitalization.

>Lily found that an odd request//

How can he tell? What does she do?

This is a really hard story to judge. It's fine for what it is, but then it never strives for that much. It's pretty obvious as soon as Apple Bloom takes Big Mac to Lily's house and Mendy is introduced how the rest of the story is going to happen, at least in a broad sense. That's not necessarily a problem, as long as the story tosses in a few surprises in the details, plays an unexpected angle, manages a nice feat of characterization, or has such an earnest authenticity that it resonates. And along that front, I do like how Mendy lies about Lily's age, but Big Mac's figured her out before Mendy even attempts it, so it takes away much of the unpredictability.

Perspective plays into this, too. The story is told through Big Mac's eyes, so we should have a front-row seat to his emotions. And while we do get some subjective thought about what he wants out of this relationship, he spends the whole time being rather calm and stoic about everything. Mendy's the one having a near-breakdown, yet Big Mac's the one framing the reader's view of the story, and his emotions are largely absent. There's some behind the scenes, but really, I have a far clearer picture about Mendy's feelings than the one whose head I'm supposed to be in. Then when he does start to get a bit fatherly, it seems like too much too soon. Here's a filly he's known for a few hours, and he's sidling onto a swing up against her, asking if she'd like them to do things together, and gazing at the sunset. There's a bit of a creepy vibe. Lily started out so shy, and now she doesn't mind the adult she's just met promising to buy her sweets at Sugarcube Corner?

It even makes for a weak ending. What point is the story making? Big Mac finds out he has a child, but he only deals with some pretty superficial existential questions, and he doesn't really come to a conclusion about it. He's at least decided he wants to spend some time with Lily, but it's fairly vague and noncommittal. He hasn't made some realization about his life, the situation with Mendy is up in the air, and he's only just started down the path of being a father, while still leaving open all the questions he asked himself.

Now, there's nothing wrong with open endings, but there's a trick to them, and that's to attach clear stakes, both positive and negative, to each of the viable options. That makes him, and consequently the reader, conflicted over what to choose. Or make it so there's a clash between what he'd prefer versus what is likely. Just something to get the reader invested. If the characters, particularly the perspective one, doesn't appear to be very passionate about how things go from here, then there's not much reason for the reader to, either. So really lay out his thoughts on the subject. There's a lot here that would concern him: Lily's well-being, his own sense of responsibility and family, what's good for Mendy. These are all intimately tied up in how he proceeds from here, so compare and contrast the good and bad of each of these threads against what he chooses. Then the reader knows what fallout will happen from any course of action. If there's not that impetus given to all the possibilities, the reader's just going to envision the nice fluffy option. There's a definite art to open endings.

To illustrate, here's a column that deals with several kinds of specialty items in stories. You can skip down to the part about open endings. It goes into more detail than I could here.

http://onemansponyramblings.blogspot.com/2016/06/gimmick-stories.html

That's really all that's lacking from this story: some kind of overall message or completed character development arc.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2691

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found, so it's up to you to use those examples to scan the full story. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>who laid on the other end of the life raft//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight.

I'm not sure why you capitalize "coast guard" some times and not others. Is it that you leave it lower case when you're referring to an individual servicemember and upper case when you refer to the whole organization?

>The stallion’s voice was heavy with guilt.//

You've done a pretty good job of avoiding this so far, but it's best not to name emotions directly, if you can help it. Better to make the stallion act as if he's guilty than just say he is. If you were a stage director, what would you tell the actor playing this role to do so the audience would interpret him as feeling guilty? That's how you have to think about it.

>With a towing line between the ring on his waist buckle and the life raft’s handle//

Is this wise? If the raft gets grabbed by something, he'll go down with it. Keep in mind how swimmers always hold a victim from behind. It's so the victim can't grab hold of the swimmer and put him in danger. The swimmer needs to be in control, and the same would go for the pegasus here. He needs to be able to cut that line away in an instant, so better if he's holding it somehow than having it fastened to him.

>He knew that risking their own lives was a part of their job, but that didn’t absolve them from worrying about each other.//

Try to avoid over-explaining thought processes like this. You do it in a couple places. It's not exactly hard to figure out, and it can feel like you're talking down to the reader. I'll revisit this later, as there might be an issue with perspective.

>Jason could feel the situation slipping away from them.//

I want to flag this sentence as well for when I talk about perspective.

>troublesome castaways//

You just called him troublesome a bit ago. It's an unusual enough word that it stands out when repeated that closely.

>Settling himself below the helicopter, his friend was forced to battle the overbearing winds and currents, just to keep the life raft in one place.//

If he's beneath the helicopter, he's also getting quite a bit of downwash from the rotor. On a helicopter this size, roughly 20k pounds weight class, he's probably getting a good 30 kts of wind, and that'd be a significant hindrance to a pegasus. It's bad enough to have that on a swimmer, but with a pegasus actually trying to fly there, he's in a significant column of air moving downward, so it'd take a lot of effort just to maintain altitude. There's a reason you don't fly anything under a helicopter. There are lots of regulations in place for formation flight and shipboard landing to keep helicopters from getting into each other's rotorwash, and that's essentially what this pegasus is doing. (I do a lot of aerodynamics work for the Navy having to do with operating helicopters aboard ships.)

>her limply body//

You have an adverb there where you need an adjective.

>high-rank//

high-ranking

>usefulness on the field//

in the field

>please,” he pleaded//

Pretty redundant choice of speaking verb.

>Jayson’s//

Why'd you change the spelling?

>seemed to struck his nerve//

Verb form is off.

>pegasi aerial support//

Noun adjuncts are always singular. For example, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

>full of hope and desperation//

Directly naming emotions again. Demonstrate them instead.

>T-Thank//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway. And consider what sound he'd actually repeat. There isn't even a "t" sound in that word.

>When he raised his head, he noticed the raft moving away from the yacht’s hull.//

I'll go ahead and mention this here, even though it's a perspective matter. You'd been telling the story recently through Jason's eyes, even having the narration express his opinions for him. So why are you switching to the dad here for a grand total of one paragraph? You have to consider perspective changes carefully, and I don't see that it accomplishes anything here, plus it's pretty jarring.

>Placing her on the medical stretcher located by the left wall, she covered her with a rescue blanket to prevent her body from further losing warmth.//

Participles make thinggs happens simultaneously, but she wouldn't use the blanket until after placing her on the stretcher.

>Despite being the main mechanic, her medical magic had found itself handy here.//

This is a very extraneous statement. It doesn't add anything.

>knowing how perilous the situation was for her colleague//

There are quite a few little places like this where you over-explain characters' mindsets. Just let their actions speak for them. What does she do that might clue the reader in? Does she have to force her thoughts to stay focused? Does she keep peeking out the door to try catching a glimpse of what's happening in the water? Things like that.

>at time like these//

Singular/plural mismatch.

>as her emotions sometimes really did tend to interfere with her work//

This is really tough to bring it in. You ought to show it happening anyway, but this isn't a good time to establish a history of it. For one, just saying there's a history means next to nothing. Examples speak far louder. But with the amount of action going on, you can't afford to go off on a tangent, and it would imply her mind is wandering to such things, which would be strangely self-aware at the moment.

>troublesome stallion//

You're going to call him that again?

>their mouth//

There's only one mouth between them?

>But thanks to his stubbornness and irrational behavior, her friend was now in the middle of what could turn out to be an actual suicide mission.//

Well... no. What the stallion did has no bearing on his daughrer still being inside. He jeopardized what the pegasus was doing, but it doesn't change Jason's mission.

>A sudden bright point appeared on the water’s dark surface.//

Missing a line break.

>began to carefully observe his environment. His ears, clogged with water, soon began//

Watch that close repetition of "began."

>JayHawk//

You hadn't been using that capitalization pattern in chapter 1.

>thousand ton//

Hyphenate.

>ANYBODY HERE?//

It's preferred to show emphasis with italics.

>On the both sides//

Extraneous word.

>he could see the railing still attached. He noticed//

You have a lot of these unnecessary words framing his perception. Unless you want to point out it's something most people would miss, it's not worth saying that a character saw or noticed something. Just say it's there. These are wasted words.

>slip-away//

INconsistent with the terminology you'd been using.

>he went passed//

Passed/past confusion.

>He took of his flippers//

Typo.

>lest he fell//

It's a rather involved explanation, but use "fall" here.

>five…” he paused when Baton Rouge’s growling scream filled the helicopter’s interior, “…four//

When you want to put a narrative aside in a quote, use dashes, and the aside doesn't take end punctuation (though it can take an exclamation mark or question mark where appropriate). It should look like this:
five—” he paused when Baton Rouge’s growling scream filled the helicopter’s interior “—four

>Panting slightly//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>'Cute', Jason thought sardonically.//

The comma goes inside the quotes.

Hm. With you using meters and words like "torch," this doesn't feel consistent with someone who's in the US Coast Guard. It's not impossible, but it is unlikely.

>On the top of the huge furniture pile right in the cabin’s centre laid… a four feet tall iron safe.//

Lay/lie confusion, four-foot-tall.

>hers right mind//

Typo.

>sat himself right before the quivering tablecloth before he gently pulled it away//

Time is of the essence here. Why isn't he just grabbing her and running? He can't afford to coax her out.

>"Well it’s about time,”//

For the most part, you have simple quotation marks in the story, but you're mixing styles here.

>the rest of debris//

Missing word.

>causing the cabin’s door to slam shot//

Typo.

>Her efforts were constantly monitored by Joe the co-pilot, and Night Shade.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>You’ll hurting yourself//

>she didn’t even knew//
>became a one big hum//
Wording is off.

>buckling over. It was over//

Watch that close repetition of "over."

>the yacht’s bow finally disappear//

Wording is off. There's a lot more of this problem in chapter 3. Not sure why.

It feels rather tacked on to suddenly introduce this subplot of Rouge being a mother. It'd be far more effective if it'd been there all along.

You keep calling this a crash site, and I don't know why. There wasn't actually a crash, not so far as we've been told.

>helicopter’s cabin edge//

helicopter cabin’s edge

>If they don't pull back now, they might never return safely to the base.//

I'm wondering why Sam hasn't been giving them regular readouts of how much fuel reserve they have. They know how much it takes to get back to shore, so he can figure out how long they can stay on station.

>on your fifth//

I don't know what this means. Is he referring to five o'clock?

>the small external crane//

It's called a winch. A crane is something different.

>Although Night Shade’s tried to sound serious//

Wording is off.

You're mixing both styles of quotation marks a lot in this chapter again.

>We’ll be pulling you out while underway, so hang on//

I don't know that they'd be allowed to do this. At the very least, they'd have to stop once they'd lifted Jason and Lion Heart up close to the cabin, since the wind would be prone to bashing them against the fuselage.

>Jason voice//

Missing a possessive.

>In the dim green light of the cabin//

I haven't been inside a helicopter at night, so I don't know what color the actual lighting is, though on Navy ships, it's usually blue or red for areas adjoining the outside, for the same reasons that would affect this crew: they don't interfere with night vision goggles, red preserves the eye's ability to see in the dark, and they don't carry as far, so they more likely keep from giving away position. There may well be green coming from the instrument panel, but actual lighting might not be green.

>every kind of weather conditions//

Singular/plural mismatch: kind -> conditions

>Can you reach the main point in present conditions//

They could potentially hot refuel from a ship. Is the storm big enough they couldn't safely rendezvous with one?

>got the professional help//

Extraneous "the."

>Rogue//

I'm actually surprised this is the first time you've had this misspelling, but maybe I just missed some. It's worth doing a global searh to see if there are others.

>Coast Guardian//

The typical terminology is Coast Guardsman, if not just airman.

>further in dangerous territory//

Usually phrased with "into."

>Jay’//

It's just a nickname. It doesn't need an apostrophe.

>the pilot’s cockpit//

Why are you specifying "pilot's" cockpit there? It's useless information.

>legend//

Even though there's no actual ship called the Legend, class names would still be capitalized.

>In the aft section of the vessel laid a flat rectangular landing area//

Lay/lie confusion.

>The fluorescent circle in the middle crossed with a longitudinal line marked the exact point for the helicopter to land.//

I'm not aware of any deck markings for Navy or Coast Guard ships being fluorescent. There's in-deck lighting outlining the shapes of the markings. The longitudinal line is called a line-up line.

>replying," replied//

Redundant.

It might be easier for them to do a hot refuel than a landing. That just requires them to hover above the aft port corner of the flight deck and lower a refueling hose.

>Stratton//

Ship names get italicized.

>present course and speed//

What they'd most care about is the readings from the ship's wind indicators, night/day, and the sea state. They can look those up on a reference table which will show the difficulty of landing and whether it's even authorized. The ship can also steer to the most advantageous angle, usually into the wind, unless the wave direction is significantly different than that.

>signaling officer//

Full name is LSO or Landing Signal Officer.

>control tower//

A ship like this doesn't have a tower. That post is the HCS or Helicopter Control Station. And it's not just the HCS and LSO giving them info. There's a device called a HARS bar on top of the HCS which stays level to give the pilot an indication of the horizon.

>garage opening//

They're hangars, and there are two of them. But they wouldn't have the doors open in this situation.//

>mamma//

As a term of address, family relations get capitalized.

>With one engine intact//

Did the other engine quit? I can't imagine he'd have enough torque to hover on one engine with that many people aboard.

>helped the survivors to exit the helicopter//

I doubt they'd be allowed to get out before the chock-and-chain guys had finished, nd they definitley wouldn't shut down the engines until then.

>to crew//

Missing word.

Minor detail, but none of these servicemembers are observing proper protocol for disembarking a vessel.

>survivor's ambulance//

There's more than one survivor, right?

>“Oh, and Jason…” the pony captain finally turned his attention to the human, “… not bad, for a bipedal.”//

Use that formatting I showed you for putting a narrative aside in a quote.

>Jason thoughts//

Missing possessive.

>He was impressed with the little filly and how brave she had been.//

Really? Once he grabbed her so they could leave the vessel, it sure seemed like she was panicking and making things difficult for him.

So now I'll go over perspective like I said I would. Pay careful attention to which character's thoughts and opinions the narrator is expressing at all times. You make some pretty abrupt shifts at times. It's much easier to change perspective at scene breaks, since you don't have to execute a transition, and there are times it seemed like that's why you used them—you switched to a different point of view even though there was no time skip and sometimes no change in location. That's fine, but even within scenes, you'll jump from one character to another. Many of the scenes start out even sounding omniscient.

For instance, take the scene that starts with:
>In the meantime, Jason, while being half-blinded by the helicopter’s search light, took his time to enjoy the view of his friends doing something for a change.//
The "for a change" takes this into the realm of a limited narrator, since it's expressing Jason's impressions on his behalf. The rest of the paragraph still works from his viewpoint, but in the next paragraph, it abruptly shifts to Lion Heart:
>At first, she could hardly make sense of her surroundings, and the dizziness in her head made her barely contain the urge to vomit.//
These are things only she could know, unless they were clearly couched as another's interpretation. (Saying something like "The green tint to her face and her wobbly knees sure made it look like she'd barely fought off a round of nausea." would frame it more as Jason's perception and keep the point of view with him.) You do stay with her for a while, and the transition to Sam's perspective isn't as abrupt, but you only stay with him for a single paragraph before moving over to Jason again.

As to the whole premise... I wonder why they even bother with helicopters anymore now that they have access to pegasi who are more maneuverable, likely faster, and capable of lifting proportionally greater loads. It wouldn't be too hard to come up with an in-universe explanation. In fact, you kind of have one already: none of the pony races are particularly good swimmers, so they need humans for that function, and it would be hard to carry the human out there in the first place. Though Equestria has those flying chariots pegasi can pull. Just might be worth saying why they need to keep the human doctrine on how to operate. Plus does it work in reverse? Do humans bring anything in effecting rescues in Equestria?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2692

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found, so it's up to you to use those examples to scan the full story. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The longer she lied in that bed//

Lay/lie confusion.

>her world decided to enforce it's twisted form//

Its/it's confusion.

>hundreds of years worth//

years'

>That word brought on nothing but worry and panic. It brought on sadness, and a strange kind of depression that not even she could describe.//

This is all so vague. It's mean a lot more if there were concrete examples of this. Give me a quick anecdote about a time she felt this way before. Otherwise, it's just abstract and detached.

>The ones that tell the tales of those who were unfortunate enough to stay awake that dreaded night.//

She's not a child, though. She's apparently managed to fall asleep every time before. So why is this such an issue? I know she'll fail to fall asleep this time, and as it gets closer to the deadline, it'll be a source of anxiety for her, but there's not a history of failure that should be making her act as if it's a chronic problem. In fact, she's never failed before. For that matter, I'll go ahead and voice a concern I already have from reading your extended synopsis. Why isn't there a system in place to sedate ponies who can't fall asleep? Why leave them to die? It doesn't seem like there's a purpose in doing so, like a certain number have to be sacrificed to maintain the way it works.

>Jazz had also heard the rumors.//

You already talked about the rumors. Why bring them up again as if they're something new?

>felt her dark brown mane press against her face//

What relevance does her mane color have here? I ask because you're using a limited narrator here, implying that she'd choose to bring up her hair color, and I don't see a reason for it.

>end up the the rest of the ponies//

Wording got messed up there.

>She even had a cute stallion of whom she had her eye on.//

Wording is off there too.

>Is it because of the things she thought?//

Why are you going to present tense?

>Her golden-colored eyes snapped open.//

Same deal as her hair color. Why would she mention it here?

>There were pierced through the darkness like a sewing needle.//

Wording is off.

>considering that she has more than enough money tucked away somewhere for college//

Switched to present tense again.

>Her heart was beating so fast, it resembled the rumblings of a train.//

I don't get what about a train's rumbling inherently equates to speed.

>nail biting//

Hyphenate, but... what do nails mean to a pony?

>It was if Death himself was perched upon her shoulder.//

Missing word.

>She contemplated turning on a radio, but deemed that a horrible idea for reasons she didn’t really know.//

You do this a lot: use a comma with a conjunction when it's merely separating a compound verb. You only need one when the new verb gets its own subject. There's a brief guide to comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

Well, I'll go ahead and voice concerns I have, and maybe the story ends up addressing them.

There's one monster, and there are apparently safe places it can't go. Why not evacuate ponies to these safe areas? Why not evacuate ponies in general and monitor the monster's movements to keep shifting ponies around to places where the monster isn't? Why not try to kill or banish the monster? And again, why not sedate ponies who can't fall asleep? This monster has a single week to patrol the entire nation. It shouldn't be hard for a small number of awake ponies to remain hidden from it. Statistically speaking, it'd be nearly impossible for it to find them, let alone travel far enough to search all the far-flung cities. It seems like it's going to spend the entire week chasing her, so any awake ponies anywhere else in Equestria will be fine. There are some parts of the premise that don't quite make sense.

>The chances that Jazz and Crest, roommates in the same household, disappear during the same Townsend are next to nil.//

Switching to present tense again.

It's quite rare to see your sentences start with anything but the subject. It helps when there's dialogue to break the narration up, but you don't have any yet, so it especially stands out. It makes the sentence structures repetitive, like reading a list.

>They moved in a seemingly random and quick manner.//

This doesn't seem like it'd be Jazz's evaluation, so it's external to her and doesn't fit the narration you've established.

>Her eyes were sleep//

I don't know what that means.

>She looked exactly how Jazz wished herself could had looked.//

Phrasing is off.

>It was odd.//

The indentation is off here.

>as if it was bleeding for Jazz and it alone.//

I don't know what the "it alone" is supposed to refer to. The sky turned color for its own sake? Or did you mean to use "him" there?

>She turned back to Crest and her quiet, shallow breathes.//

You're using the verb form "breathes" where you need the noun.

>Her body rose and fell with every breathe//

Same thing.

>next to it’s fallen master//

Its/it's confusion.

>selfish — waking//

Don't put spaces around an em dash.

>she most she could do//

Typo.

>full blown//

Hyphenate.

>Jazz’s shakes grew rougher, and faster, until eventually the mare was almost pushing her friend off of her own bed.//

You're using a limited narrator, so you're having Jazz choose to refer to herself as "the mare" in her own thoughts. Who does that?

>Jazz had never heard of anypony who had actually woken up during the fated week.//

I'm confused. How would she know if anyone had woken up during Townsend versus not being able to fall asleep in the first place? She mentioned ponies disappearing, but how does she know which one of these situations applied to them? There's never been someone who was awake at any point during Townsend who was still around afterward to say what happened. Yet she can still differentiate whether they woke up early or never fell asleep? How?

>“Oh no, no... “//

Extraneous space, which has made your quotation marks backward.

>as they realize that their darling daughter had become a victim of The Townsend//

Switch to present tense. I'm marking a lot of the same things over and over again, and I'll be at this forever if I keep doing so. At this point, I have to leave it to you to find these things yourself.

>Tossing aside every childish will//

Strange phrasing.

>Her eyes were as wide as dinner plates//

Besides being a cliched phrase, how would she know this? She can't see them.

>she a bit too bothered//

Missing word.

>It had taken Jazz a few moments//

>It took her a little longer than she’d like//
These are in the same paragraph. Then in the next one, we get this:
>It had taken Jazz approximately ten seconds//

>maybe-//

Use a proper dash.

The indentation is very uneven in chapter 3. It's probably a result of importing from GDocs or some such, but since you're leaving blank lines between your paragraphs, you don't need to indent at all.

>“Just… calm down."//

Notice how you have a mix of quotation mark styles. Keep these and the apostrophes consistent throughout the story.

>If somepony else was still awake, they’d have to be there, right? J//

Extraneous letter at the end.

>She passed the homes of ponies of whom she just vaguely knew.//

That second "of" shouldn't be there.

>flower and coffee bean covered//

Hyphenate all that.

>since she made her way to the police station//

This makes it sound like she's already been to the plice station, but she hasn't gotten there yet.

>Hello-//

Use a dash.

>It sounded like a pig was being slaughtered right in front of the world’s largest megaphone.//

That's kind of comical for how serious this is supposed to be. And how would a pony even come up with a pig being slaughtered as a comparison? That presumably doesn't happen in Equestria.

>Whatever the creature was, it rammed through the glass doors//

How'd it even get in? I'm guessing it only searches each building once, so if you hole up in a place it's already checked, wouldn't you be okay? Unless it saw you go in there, of course.

>full maximum//

Pretty redundant.

>monsters footsteps//

>this monsters steps//
Missing apostrophe.

>the shrill cry that the screeching cry that//

Something got messed up there.

>behind her as an astonishingly quick pace//

Typo.

>It’s defeated cries//

Its/it's confusion.

>It’s lights shown brightly//

Only use "it's" if you want it to expand out to "it is" or "it has." If you want to show possession, don't use an apostrophe. That's just the way all possessive pronouns work, like my, your, his, her, our, their. No apostrophes. And you've confused "shown" with "shone."

>Opening the door with her injured hoof, she jumped behind the desk.//

The participle makes these actions happen at the same time, but they'd more likely happen one after the other.

>dimly swinging//

I have no idea what this would mean. How would something swing in a dim manner? They have nothing to do with each other.

>fully wail in fright//

Why would she give away her location like that?

>Jazz had somehow managed to cry herself to sleep.//

So falling asleep after the deadline doesn't count, I guess?

>small leak dripped monotonously into a small//

Watch the close word repetition.

>eight, soulless//

Those are hierarchical adjectives, so they don't need a comma between them. Basically, they describe different aspects and would sound really awkward in reverse order.

>She had to forget about monster//

Missing word.

>and the poor mare//

That's a rather external assessment for her own limited narration to make about herself.

>The blue mare//

That too.

>even close, unable to reach even//

Watch the close repetition.

>Jazz lied back//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Whether or not she got out of there alive or not//

Redundant "or not."

>Why would it come down here.//

That's a question, right?

>Whatever what coming upstairs//

Typo.

>medium pitched//

Hyphenate.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2693

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found, so it's up to you to use those examples to scan the full story. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'm going to illustrate a point. By paragraph, here are all the "to be" verbs in the first screenful:

-was, were, was
-been, been, been, was, was, was, been
-was, be, be, were, was, was
-was, wasn't, was, were, was
-was, was

First, that can get pretty repetitive. Second, that's about the most boring verb possible. Nothing happens. It's a good idea to pick active verbs wherever you can (dialogue gets somewhat of a pass), but it's especially important to keep the beginning of the story from feeling stagnant like this.

>it was nearly impossible to read with a glance//

>I glanced around me//
Try to avoid close word repetition like this. These instances of "glance" are only two sentences apart. There's another just a couple paragraphs later:
>I glanced back at the doors//

>finding it the same//

>finding the more I examined this world around me//
>finding the endless forest to be the only thing else//
>finding only pitch-black ahead of me//
>finding the warm, orange glow//
>finding it empty//
These are all within the first two pages.

>inside was as dark as night itself//

>I peered inside the doorway//
>As I inched closer inside//
>When I took a step inside//
>I ventured further inside//
>Something inside me//
>I took a few cautious steps inside//
And so are these. For that matter, how many times can she go inside? She inches inside, then takes a step inside, then ventures further inside, then takes a few cautious steps inside.

>As I pass through the doorway//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>My eyes drifted further to my right, ending at the wall just next to me; a counter with stools seated on the side facing the dining room.//

For a semicolon to be used right, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both sentences stand as complete, but the second part here would be a fragment.

>She rest her head lazily against her hoof//

The verb form is off.

>She looked tired, but relaxed, and her smile looked as though she had just seen an old friend. But, as inviting as she looked//

And 3 uses of "looked" in only 2 sentences. Yeah, repetition is going to be a significant problem.

>I glanced around at the dining room again, hoping for a little more direction on what to call this place, “restaurant is located.”//

You have that punctuated and capitalized as if it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>Luna’s…That’s a rather odd name for a restaurant…//

How so? Luna's answer is completely reasonable. Why wouldn't the narrator assume that?

>She poured a glass, and slid it over to me.//

You do this a fair amount too: use a comma with a conjunction when it's only separating a compound verb. You only need one when the new verb also has a new subject. There's a guide to comma use with conjunctions at the top of this thread.

>She raised her hoof, and rest her head against it once more.//

Another unnecessary comma, and the verb form's off again. Come to think of it, it's the same verb as last time. Are you just used to seeing "rest" as the past tense of it? It's not an accepted one. You do this throughout the story.

>I pushed the menu away, and leaned back on my stool for some breathing room.//

No comma.

>My eyes darted around the room once more, deciding I could look past its sickly nature.//

This says her eyes decided she could look past its nature.

>a cup coffee//

Missing word.

I'm seeing enough uses of "small" and "smile" that they're also sticking in my head.

>I couldn't say I had never met a pony so cryptic before.//

I'm not sure this says what you want it to say, due to the double negative.

>None of the keys looked nothing like a modern key//

Same thing. I think this says the opposite of what you wanted.

>down from the stool top down//

More close word repetition. There are more of these than I'm noting—I just wanted to pick out some examples.

>One way lead up a set of rickety wooden stairs, the second led//

You spelled the same verb two different ways (the second is correct).

>“It keeps us from any…” Luna paused to contemplate for a brief moment, “sleepwalking mishaps.”//

If you want to break into a quote with a non-speaking aaction, here's how you do it:
>“It keeps us from any—” Luna paused to contemplate for a brief moment “—sleepwalking mishaps.”//
This turns up again in chapter 10, where you at least get the dashes right, but you needlessly capitalize the aside.

>Who knew what else lay beneath the surface of such a pony.//

That's a question, right?

>In fact, this entire restaurant is one giant riddle.//

You've switched to present tense again.

>With a small turn//

>With a small turn of her hoof//
These are in the same paragraph.

>on sitting on//

Extraneous word.

>barely hiding my discontent//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

And in this chapter, you have 12 uses of "small." 8 of them are on the last screenful.

From here on, I'm going to assume I've provided enough examples of things from the first two chapters, and I'll mostly only bring up new issues.

>The more I tried think about //

Missing word.

>did…I//

Needs a space after the ellipsis.

>I had to think about how I got to this forest and why I’m in this restaurant.//

Tense shift.

>I waited the pony’s reply//

Missing word.

>it often lead to making baseless assumptions//

You're using the present tense form where you need the past.

>She watch the mare//

>I caught her eyes shift to me//
Verb form.

>down the dark hallway passed the bar//

Passed/past confusion.

>as the realization that everypony was trapped inside these woods//

You've got a clause without a verb here.

You have a number of spots in this chapter where you punctuate a question with a period.

>hanging from it’s elongated jaw//

Its/it's confusion.

>It placed his//

You're vacillating between calling Discord a "he" and an "it" a number of times.

>Discord, is my name.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Something about the way he spoke made me feel even more uncomfortable than Luna.//

Luna doesn't feel uncomfortable.

>matter of fact//

In this usage (it's acting as a single descriptor for something that follows it), hyphenate.

>His eyes ran over my for a second.//

My what?

>I lost mine quite sometime ago.//

His what? He mentioned insanity, not sanity. And this is an instance where "some time" needs to be two words.

>play anymore tricks//

And "any more" needs to be two words here.

>How could it have changed.//

Isn't that a question?

>“She’s locked up, that doesn’t mean she’s crazy.//

Missing the closing quotation marks.

>all out sprint//

all-out

>I read, “Luna’s”//

That's not dialogue, so you don't need the comma.

>bright, neon//

Those are hierarchical adjectives (the non-foolproof test is that they'd sound really awkward if you reversed the order), so you don't need a comma between them.

>But, all this darkness offered no other hints as to where I was.//

There's rarely a good reason to put a comma after a conjunction. This one doesn't belong.

>I remembered coming in from fog.//

Missing word.

>Stumbling across the room, my hoof missed a few passes at the door handle//

This says her hoof stumbled across the room.

>mesmerically//

Is that even a word? I'd expect "mesmerizingly."

>When she slammed the bottle back down, her hoof and foreleg hit the table with enough force to cause it to shake.//

This is exactly what happened a bit ago.

>A chill crept down up//

How does that work?

>I only grit my teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>coalesced in shifting wall of fog//

Missing word.

>The words were just barely above a whisper, hardly audible even in the dead of the night. I only managed to catch them by listening carefully.//

You've essentially said the same thing three times.

>drudging//

dredging

>Coming to the top, however, some odd sound from behind me caught my ear.//

You occasionally have these dangling participles. This says some odd sound came to the top.

>refusing to acknowledge the dread crept up my spine//

The verb form is off.

>strown//

strewn

>safe…” Her voice trailed off//

The ellipsis already means trailing off, so narrating it as well is redundant.

>Her eyes searched my own as her head fell slowly to the side.//

>Her ears perked as something like joy pushed through the madness.//
>I furrowed my eyebrows as I pressed back into the door.//
>Frantically, she clapped her hooves as an exuberant grin spread across her face.//
>She groaned as she hit struck her head a few times with her hoof//
>I rubbed my head as I looked at whoever had burst in.//
>Luna said as she stepped into the disaster that was the crazy mare’s room.//
>Shivers radiated into me as I slowly realised this crazy mare—Twilight, apparently—was utterly terrified.//
>I took my leave, though I kept staring daggers at Luna as I passed.//
Those are taken from a stretch of only 7 consecutive paragraphs. See how often you use those "as" clauses? It gets very structurally repetitive when the same element keeps turning up.

>showing the disappointed boredom on her face. Her eyes were still half-closed, keeping their disinterested aura, but her gaze held some resentment//

Look at all those emotions you're not demonstrating. None of this paints a picture. I just have to take the narrator's word for it in the absence of evidence, which just leaves it so abstract. Show me what I'd see if I were there witnessing it myself, and let me draw the conclusions.

>“As I said before,” she said//

Fairly repetitive use of "said."

>struck a cord//

chord

>Surprise, annoyance, and resignation warred with each other for control of my expression.//

I haven't been marking all the spots where you blatantly tell emotions, but I wanted to call this one out for a specific reason: it doesn't fit your narration. How does the narrator know what her facial expression is? Certain things about it, she could feel, but that would be the position or condition of body parts, not the emotion driving it. Look at it this way: do you have to look in a mirror to know you're sad (plus the narrator here can't see her own face anyway)? There are far more immediate ways you know your own mood then from how you look.

>[i[had//

Broken tag.

>who I recognized//

Whom, if your perspective character would know that.

>C-cheers//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. There isn't a "c" sound in that word.

>But, I suppose it was all for naught.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Rarity turn her attention to me.//

Typo.

>she said with a laugh as a smirk broke out//

You've mentioned her smirking more than once now. You use it a lot for Luna, but you acknowledge the repetition there, making it thematic. For Rarity, it just feels repetitive.

>I should have known would be of no help//

Missing word.

>"Purple coat, really frazzled," Doormat brushed her mane from in front of her face//

You've punctuated that like a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>But, damned if it wasn’t something.//

That comma shouldn't be there.

>the sickly sweet liquor//

Wine's usually considered separate from liquor, but I suppose it depends on whether your character knows that.

>a faint sounds//

>The door swung opened//
Typo.

>something.I//

Missing space.

>twack//

Did you mean "thwack"? And don't italicize that. It's a valid word, and putting sound effects in narration suggests a far more lighthearted atmosphere than you have going here.

>jibberish//

Usually spelled "gibberish."

>patted on Pinkie on//

Extraneous word.

>Her gaze trailed from Pinkie to myself.//

Reflexive pronouns are really only for when the same person or thing is the clause's subject.

>The feeling from the cur Rarity’s icy gaze burrowing deep into the back of my skull made sure even that small kernel of happiness was short-lived .//

Extraneous space before the period, and that's just strangely phrased. It took me a while to parse it, and it is a valid construction, but it takes a bit of picking apart to figure it out.

>Then heart lept//

Missing word and typo.

>Twilight didn’t even acknowledge Rarity; nor did she ask my permission as she slid into the seat across from me.//

What's that semicolon doing that a comma wouldn't?

>thud//

Same deal with italicizing that sound effect.

>"This way,” came Twilight’s whispering voice. The cook’s busy in the freezer."//

Missing your opening quotation marks for the second part of the quote. And note how you've mixed simple and fancy style quotation marks. Make sure you use one kind throughout the story. I have seen authors use one kind for quotation marks and the other for apostrophes, and that's fine, as long as you're consistent. I see a lot of this in chapter 14, and while I don't recall seeing it before this, it might have escaped my notice.

>less trees//

"Less" is for collective quantities, like money. You want "fewer."

>away, ghosting away//

Close repetition.

>at wits end//

at wits' end

>pulled the door opened//

Typo.

>As the door swung open//

Set off the dependent clause with a comma.

>dusty, musty//

That rhyme tends to create a playful mood, which isn't what you want here.

>cellar!" The darkness called out//

Capitalization.

>head first//

headfirst

>who glared at the mare//

Another dependent clause that needs a comma.

It occurs to me now that our protagonist has never wondered why Fluttershy doesn't fly up above the fog to see the terrain. Now that Dash has been discovered, that'd apply to her, too.

>big-shot//

No reason to hyphenate that term.

>as her eyes drift closed completely//

You've shifted to present tense.

>soldout crowd//

sold-out

>before stopping just past myself and Twilight//

Another spot where a reflexive pronoun isn't appropriate.

So far, the buggest issues are sheer repetition and occasional blunt naming of character emotion, though there are a few persistent editing errors. I do have one concern going forward. All of the other bar patrons are caricatures of canon characters, but pushed so far that they're obviously not their canon selves. I get that they're supposed to be part of a dream logic, and so they don't have to be realistic, but I gather that Luna more or less is the actual Luna. I do wonder why Luna chooses to act in such an antagonistic manner, though. And it does call into question why to use these characters in particular. If the protagonist turns out to be someone who knows them all, then they may well be drawn from her own subconscious. But if they're strangers to her, then I don't know why they're even there. It's pretty random to pick real ponies who happen to personify these qualities, which suggests they're then deliberate choices on Luna's part, and I'm not sure why she'd populate this place with such disrespectful parodies of her own friends. That just leads me back to the assumption that the protagonist must know them all, as it's the only explanation that makes sense; furthermore, it's really the only explanation that makes this a pony story at all, since otherwise, they're just archetypes who have no meaning in this universe, and then they could be human or whatever without changing anything. So if you don't already have some sort of connection planned, I'd encourage you to think about why these specific ponies are represented here and make it plausible that the protagonist or Luna (whoever's invented them) would choose them in the first place and decide to portray them in this manner.

I'll emphasize again that I didn't mark every instance of every problem I saw, particularly after the first few chapters, so I'm leaving it to you to recognize the kinds of things I've pointed out and scan the story for other instances of the same. If you can tune this up a bit, I'd be happy to post it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2706

>Shooting through where the ill-fated structure used to float//
>leaving a trail of blue for any ponies who might look up at her//
>carving another swath through her sky.//
>Finishing her turn//
>lit by the afternoon sun//
>scattering a few flecks of loose cloud//
>Stretching her body back and forth//
>feeling her blood flow subside//
>protruding from her mailbox//
>not bothering to close the little door//
>signed with Spitfire's cutie mark//
You use a ton of participial phrases. These all occur on the first screen, in only 6 paragraphs. They're a structure many authors of intermediate experience tend to overuse. I see the appeal: they lend a sophistication and they're descriptive, but you also don't encounter them that much in everyday speech, so they're unusual. The more unusual something is, the more easily it sticks out when repeated. They're also not the kind of thing Dash would use that much in her own thoughts. It's particularly clunky to see more than one in a single sentence. In addition, there are some common problems that crop up with them, and you likely have those when you use so many.

A little further in, you have a bunch of Dash's thoughts presented as italicized quotes, but you have the type of narrator who can simply state them for her. So why are you going for two methods of delivery there? It's inconsistent. It's possible to do so, but generally as an occasional thing, not like the huge number of quoted thoughts you have. Unless you want to recast the narration as omniscient, that is. Then you wouldn't have to worry about matching the narration to Dash's voice. It's up to you, but you need to decide what kind of narration you want.

>It was the simple things that made life good sometimes.//

A lot of what the narration says is factual, but this is clearly Dash's opinion. That raises two issues. For the first one, look back at this line:
>the pegasus continued on at full speed//
If you're going to have the narrator express Dash's opinions as his own, then you're using a limited narrator. Essentially, the narration is Dash's internal stream of thought. But why would she refer to herself as "the pegasus"? That's very external. People just don't think about themselves in such terms. The other issue: you don't have the narration express her opinion very often. If you really want a limited narrator, you have to keep that personal voice going, or it just reverts to feeling omniscient. Then, when you do have an opinion creep in, it feels out of place. And the personal voice could use a little work, too. Take this line:
>She reached into the box and fished around within until she was confident she had extracted its contents.//
That doesn't sound like something Dash would think. It's got advanced word choice and very formal construction. It ought to sound like something she'd actually think to herself or maybe even say out loud.
>boring social stuff she never bothered with//
Now, there you go. This sounds very much like something Dash would say. It's clearly her personal impression, and it takes on her voice. This is how most of your narration should sound.

>the Carousel Boutique//

You don't use "the" with most proper place names, unless is actually part of the title. You go to the store, but you go to Target.

>forgetting to close the window behind her//

If you want a limited narrator, keep in mind that the narrator and Dash are the same. If Dash forgot, so did the narrator; he can't tell me she forgot.

Now that she's going into this social event, the narration is getting very bland. Compare it to the beginning of the story. There was lots of description and imagery. Now it's very bare-bones. Give me a little detail. And if you want a limited narration, speckle it with Dash's personal observations about what's going on.

>demonstration to show her//

Redundant.

>A quarter of the present//

Missing word or typo.

>I look forwards to meeting him.//

forward

>connections,"—Rarity//

Extraneous comma.

>Confusion crossed Golden Goose’s face.//

Try to avoid outright naming emotions like this. It's closer to real life when the reader has to interpret behavioral cues and deduce emotion. How does he look that Dash would interpret as confusion? Give me the visual and let me figure out the emotion.

>the subtle changes in his expression//

This means nothing if I don't get to see them.

>Golden Goose had spotted them and approached the couple.//

Wait, he tried to invite himself along with her. I got the impression that was his way of getting there. If he was going anyway, why'd he press to be her date? Maybe he's got a crush on her, but I've seen no signs of that.

>small, round//

These are hierarchical adjectives, so they don't need a comma. The not-foolproof test is that they describe different aspects, and that they have a natural order they like to be in, such that if you reverse the order, it sounds really awkward.

You did better when there wasn't much dialogue, but now that we're in the middle of lots of conversation, take a look at your narrative sentences. They're quite repetitive in structure, all starting with the subject, and all about the same length. Try to throw a little variety in there.

>Rainbow flashed an apologetic look. Rarity returned an annoyed one.//

Describe them. This doesn't paint a picture. You're making me do the work.

>we gotta talk about it//

This again highlights the need to decide what kind of narration you want. If Dash was having that much of a reaction to it, then that should have shown up in the narration. Yet the narration was silent about it. For an omniscient narrator, that's fine. For a limited narration, that implies Dash either had no reaction or was avoiding thinking about it.

>At least I know what your tongue tastes like now.//

This also seems like something that should have been mentioned at the time, but it's a gray area. It is kind of nice to be surprised by it now, but it'll depend on your narration. Like if you have a limited narration and Dash doesn't mention it when it happened, that implies it didn't surprise her or she didn't notice it, neither of which is the case. I'm also surprised Rarity did it, as nobody else would have been able to tell, so it wasn't necessary to keep up the act. I'm guessing she did it because she wanted to.

>Rarity donned her own winter outfit and the two left the hotel room with their luggage to check out.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>around at the snow stuck to the tops of the trees and sitting on the buildings around//

Watch that close repetition. Plus the "around them" phrasing is kind of repetitive with the "behind them" in the previous clause.

>She studied its contents as she passed and made a mental note for later.//

You're really in a rut of starting narrative sentences with the subject. But also consider that you appear to be using Dash as your limited narrator, so you tell me she reads this flyer, but you don't tell me what it said. Essentially, this means Dash is refusing to think about what it said, like she saw it but it didn't register. And yet you say she's filing it away. That doesn't compute.

>a second snowball interrupted her.//

Capitalize that. There's no reason not to have it as a new sentence.

>She scooped up a large wad in her forehooves flew up with it//

Missing an "and" or a comma.

>mostly-buried//

Two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb don't typically take hyphens, as there's no ambiguity in the hierarchy of modifiers.

>Below, the rhythmic click-clack of the wheels reminded its occupants of its progress. Inside, a pegasus and a unicorn sat side by side on an upholstered seat.//

Repetitive way to start those two sentences (though I'm glad you're not using the subject). However, this is decidedly omniscient.

>"Then I never"—she paused to get some air—"want to see your face ever again!"//

This sounds like she stops speaking for the pause. In that case, the dashes go with the speech:
"Then I never—" she paused to get some air "—want to see your face ever again!"

>laying on her back//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Followed by, Spending more time with her would be so awesome.//

That kind of phrasing, which doesn't really use a speaking verb, tends to work better with a colon instead of a comma.

>Come on Rainbow,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides.

As Rainbow goes around to visit all her friends, you're using direct address a lot more than feels natural. It's not necessary for them to know when to listen, since it's only two of them at a time. It's fine for emphasis, but that should be an occasional thing, not a significant portion of the time.

>a familiar voice called from the other side//

That's pretty much the same phrasing you used at Fluttershy's house.

>Concern grew on her face.//

Let me see how this looks.

>Rainbow heart//

Missing possessive.

>She looked up and launched herself into the sky//

Just more of this rut where every sentence starts with the subject. Beginning here, you have ten sentences in a row that do so, and many of them are about the same length.

>Instead she turned her attention to the pony saying them. Rarity looked so animated talking about her passions, and Rainbow could tell she was enjoying her self-promotion. She was so nice to look at, from the way she moved her head to how her shoulders shifted when she changed topics.//

I just want to flag this for later, for something I'll talk about in wrap-up comments.

>Another pause.//

A little of this goes a long way. Authors like to use this sentence, but really, it means next to nothing. What's important is what happens during the pause. What little action does Dash do to signify she's thinking? What goes through her head? That's what makes the pause meaningful.

>Rainbow took a breath and focused on Rarity's deep blue eyes. She then turned her thoughts to what was behind them.//

Flagging this for later, too.

>"Well,"—Rainbow walked in front of Rarity—"I figure,//

Lose that first comma. Also consider whether the dash placement is what you want, given what I said earlier about how that indicates if the speech stops or not.

>Rainbow felt Rarity's chest move under her wing as she breathed.//

You already said as much.

>burst!//

So far, you'd always included an exclamation mark or question mark in the italics (which is the standard way of doing it when the italics are for emphasis).

Okay, I'll bring back in those lines I tagged. But first I want to say how nice it is to see a romance done this way. It's not perfect, but it's far better than most we get. For one thing, Rarity's not super-conveniently already in love with Dash as well. She's just willing to give it a try and see if Rainbow can win her over. Now, I do think there would tend to be at least a tiny attraction there in the first place, or it'd seem like Rarity's agreeing to the date for charity reasons more than anything else. I mean, she would admire Rainbow as a friend anyway, and it might be nice to see that creep in a bit than the slightly guarded disdain she exudes all the time now. Anyway, I like seeing the slow burn here, where it takes them some time to establish a relationship, not just diving into it, and that the story doesn't stop there (you are going to add more chapters, right?), since it's a pretty cliched thing to have their agreement to date or kiss or get married (I guess the jury's still out on that one) as the story's goal.

I don't know if you intended it this way, but Rarity's adherence to by-the-book ways that couples are supposed to behave smacks of Twilight and her sleepover manual, and it lends her a naivete that's quite cute, especially if I take it as not personal naivete but universal, as in that's just the attitude that ponies in general have. It keeps things closer to a show tone, which of course isn't required, but I found it charming. The tongue thing kind of works against that, though...

Now I will get to those excerpts I said I wanted to discuss. I do see Rarity's attitude toward this relationship, but the more I think about it, Rainbow's doesn't quite make sense. I think the pieces are there; it's more that they're out of order. So look at the first one. Rainbow's reciting all the things she likes about Rarity, but why is she just now thinking of this? The "omigosh" moment where she decides she wants to date Rarity was based on simply enjoying the kiss and possibly the companionship. But isn't that the time for her to take stock of what she likes about Rarity and decide that it really is a romantic interest? I mean, that's what makes people want to be together: they enjoy each other's personalities and get along well. Yet Rainbow does't know that yet and hasn't even considered it? That's hard to buy. I have to think she has gone over this stuff in her head, and pretty much anywhere between the fake date and her realization she wants a real one, whether it's little by little or in a rush, is the time for all this to occur to her.

Then look at the second excerpt I flagged. Now we're even later in the game, and surely she's thought about what qualities she liked in Rarity by now. Maybe on not such a formal level, but there needs to be something. This is far past the point she should be a mindset deeper than "I feel funny when I look at her."

So what I'd really like to see is this kind of self-searching about what attracts her to Rarity start much earlier, before she realizes she enjoyed the fake date much more than she meant to, and definitely before she goes to all the trouble of actually asking her out.

Be careful how you do that as well. You don't want to be vague. Working by example is often the most powerful way to go. So rather than just say she appreciates Rarity's generosity, have her reminisce about a one-to-two sentence anecdote from a time she saw that generosity in action. Instead of just saying Rarity is pretty, have her recall a time that Rarity's beauty struck her, and maybe that she didn't understand her reaction at the time. Things like that. Aragon put together a good series of blogs on how to make shipping realistic; they're linked off his home page. It might be worth reading through a bit of that to get more in-depth information on what I'm getting at here: that Rainbow needs to have, at least on a subconscious level, a sense of what she likes about Rarity and what each one of their give and take from the relationship would be. That's really all this story needs on a conceptual level.

The mechanics are pleasantly clean, too, except for all the structural repetition of subject-first and participial phrases. I mentioned that participles can go wrong in multiple ways, which are misplaced modifiers, dangling participles, and synchronization problems. You had a few spots that strayed into gray areas, but nothing outright wrong, which is impressive. I'm not sure whether you're just careful about your participle usage or if you're incredibly lucky. Like the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop, the world may never know. Anyway, that's the other thing I'd like to see from this story: more variety in your sentences so they don't get bogged down in having the same things over and over again.

Oh, and sort out what kind of narrator you want to use, as that affects how well the narrator's voice should match Dash's and how appropriate it is to present so much of Dash's internal thoughts as quoted material versus narrative comment.

If you can get a handle on those things, I'd be happy to post this. In fact, there aren't any pervasive plot and character problems to where I'd need to read it in detail again. I'd just want to spot-check things, so you can mark it as "back from Mars" when you're ready to resubmit.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2711

Right away, there are some subtle oddities in the perspective. First, we get this:
>the pink earth pony//
People don't think about themselves or others they know in such abstractly external terms, so this would seem to be an omniscient narrator. But a little later, this turns up:
>chuckling at her employer’s silly question//
This expresses an opinion in the narration, so it'd tend to indicate a limited narrator. It's most likely Sweet Roll's viewpoint, but it's possible this is Cherry judging her own question as silly. Shortly after:
>The fun hadn’t yet begun!//
That's not just an opinion. That's the narrator directly taking on one of the characters' voices. So you definitely have a limited narrator, and probably in Cherry's perspective. So you have to be careful to keep it that way.

>crystal blue eyes//

I could see her commenting on her own hair color, since it's hanging right in front of her face. But she can't see her own eyes, and their color isn't relevant to what's happening, so why would she mention it?

>“Hmm, that looks good!” She exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>Recipes were unnecessary, for she knew them all by heart.//

Then why'd she clip them up? Just knowing what she wanted to make should be enough.

>a two-oven kitchen//

You're using a lot of repetitive language around here. Within three paragraphs, you mention recipes three times, "mixed" gets used twice, You say she has two ovens twice.

>Everything was first name basis.//

First-name, and it seems like there are a couple missing words.

>the corner of his shiny black eyes//

One corner for two eyes?

>“Oh,” she mentally grasped his meaning.//

You punctuated that as if it was a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>The tantalizing aroma of chocolate and sugar wafted from the kitchen.//

Watch your perspective again. Cherry is your perspective character, but she's in the kitchen, so she wouldn't know what was wafting out. And it's more Burt who finds it tantalizing. You seem to be switching perspectives, but there's a finesse in doing so, and it's rarely necessary in a story this short.

>Ashleigh//

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that "Burt" was short for something, but now this? They're supposed to be ponies, right?

>lanky, yellow stallion//

Those are hierarchical adjectives, so you don't need a comma between them. The non-foolproof test is that they describe different aspects and that they tend to sound more awkward in a different order.

>A few awkward seconds and a wink from a fellow taxi passing by later, her head popped up.//

Now this seems to be from Manual's perspective.

>A wry grin started to form on the edge of his lips//

Missing your end punctuation.

>“Long enough.” He said//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>mug, watched//

You have an extra space in there.

>Slipping out of her boots, she left them on the mat next to the door.//

Keep in mind that participles make things happen at the same time, but she wouldn't leave her boots on the mat until after she'd slipped them off.

>The mare smiled back and pushed the cart around the corner into the kitchen.//

And given your limited narration, this is essentially Cherry referring to herself as "the mare." People just don't do that.

>as she were their mother of sorts//

Missing an "if."

>as she were their mother of sorts//

That's not the first time he's used direct address is it? If you're calling attention to the formal title he uses, that's not what direct address is.

>“Yeah, who is it?” A husky voice grunted from behind the door.//

Capitalization.

>your Majesty//

The "your" gets capitalized in that phrase, too.

>26//

Spell out numbers that short.

>The mare flinched//

That odd reference again. For that matter, she knows Nutmeg well, so it's odd for her to think of him as "the stallion."

>now rabid//

Hyphenate.

>her voice laden with urgency//

Odd for her to describe the emotion in her voice instead of the emotion she's actually feeling. Authors often fall into this trap, like saying the perspective character had an expression of rage. But that's not how we perceive our own emotions. Would you have to look in a mirror to know you were angry? Would you have to hear your own voice to know you has a sense of urgency?

>—.//

Don't put a period after a dash.

>Yet, a little nagging voice in the back of her mind told her otherwise.//

It's rarely valid to put a comma after a conjunction. This one doesn't belong.

>Flinging open the door, she tackled him with a hug.//

Another spot where a participle synchronizes actions that should probably happen in sequence.

>the light pink earth pony/

Another odd reference. Do you call your grandfather "the gray-haired man"?

>Cherry rubbed her hooves together, a few embarrassed chuckles escaping her lips, “Um,//

Another spot where you punctuate something like a speech tag when it has no speaking verb.

>50//

Write it out.

>wait. . .” her mother’s voice trailed off//

The ellipsis already meas she trailed off. Narrating it as well is redundant. It's also weird that you're using Cherry as your perspective character, but the camera stays behind after she leaves.

I just noticed your paragraph indentations are pretty uneven.

>Fili-second//

Both parts of the hyphenated name would be capitalized. Look for this eery time you use that name.

>Dropping into a side alley, the pink mare peeked around the corner//

More synchronization issues.

>Cherry found herself in small dull room//

Missing word. Plus the "found herself" phrasing means it was unexpected, but she knows where she's going.

>we’re— Oh//

Don't put a space after the dash.

>The pink mare//

Another odd reference.

This is a nice little behind-the-scenes kind of thing showing what Fili-Second gets up to during her free time, but ultimately, I'm not sure what the point was aside from being a simple fluff piece. Cherry doesn't have to struggle to achieve anything, and any interesting things we learn about her (namely the fact that she does all these charitable activities) happen right up front, so they don't develop through the story. It's nice that she's trying to reach out to the Mane-iac, but what does it accomplish? Is this helping to rehabilitate her? Or has the Mane-iac expressed on her own that she wishes she would have visitors? There's really nothing that changes as a result of these events, and nobody has to go to any trouble to achieve something. What message did you want the reader to take away from this? That Cherry is a nice person? That's fine, but it doesn't need a whole story to convince me of that. Show me what a difference that has made, not just that she drops in on these ponies in need, but that it's really changed their lives for the better. Particularly for the Mane-iac, since that's the one you chose to dwell on. What sort of change has come over her due to Cherry's attention? Compare the before and after. Show that the Mane-iac has become a better person. Something like that.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2717

>"Keep doing that and you'll go deaf in one ear."//
As opposed to... having them on straight and going deaf in both ears? I'm not sure what Sugarcoat's getting at. That Lemon shouldn't be wearing headphones at all?

>Lemon sighed heavily, and shook her head to clear her mind.//

The same subject does both verbs. That makes it a compound verb, not a separate clause, so you don't need the comma.

>everything!"//

Take care that you don't include the quotation marks in the italics, unless the entire quote is italicized. This happens throughout the story, so scan the whole thing for it.

>'Course//

You don't need the apostrophe, since you're eliminating an entire word, not clipping some letters off this one. You use this spelling a couple of times.

>ya'//

And you don't need that apostrophe either. You're not clipping letters off, just making a spelling imitative of a pronunciation of what is still the whole word. You do this one a lot. A global search and replace would get rid of them.

>in genuine surprise//

>excitedly//
You were doing well at demonstrating emotion instead of naming it, but then I get these two close together. Something like this can work sparingly, but not if the emotion is important to the story, and you don't want to lean on it much. Have them act accordingly so the reader can deduce the emotion without you saying it.

>Vinyl made a face.//

Describe it a bit. This is so vague it doesn't mean anything.

>Lemon could see curiosity//

Yeah, make her act curious. It's more realistic when a reader interprets behavior then when he just has the narrator drawing the conclusion for him. That's how we read other people, so it feels more natural. There's no narrator in real life telling us how people feel.

Oh, the cloud's real? That's... interesting.

>faux-nervously//

What she said in conjunction with the giggle already gets this across. You don't need to spell it out.

>Her embarrassment//

Just describe the change in her behavior and appearance. Don't leave it as some abstract assessment of her mood.

>and her cheeks pinked//

This is a subtle thing about perspective. Consider you've been telling the story from Lemon's viewpoint. She can't see her own cheeks to notice this. She may conclude that by the fact they've gotten warm, for example, but not through direct observation. You have to consider how the viewpoint character can and would perceive what the narration describes.

>This is about losing yourself, and being where you want to be//

No need for that comma.

>They rubbed, they squeezed... they massaged.//

Okay, this is kind of coming out of nowhere. And I'm nervous that this is the Romance tag coming in, specifically because it comes out of nowhere. We'll see, but it's curious that this elicits no response from Lemon. If it's unexpected, it should surprise her. If it's not unexpected, then it speaks to a pre-existing relationship, yet they sure haven't acted like they're in one until now.

>She sat back, and gazed outside again.//

Don't need that comma.

>every time I thought screwed things up//

Missing word.

>Classical?//

You do, however, italicize exclamation marks or question marks on a word that's been italicized for emphasis. You'd been doing so until now.

>She squeezed Lemon's hands, and grinned knowingly.//

Don't need that comma.

>and looked like it had been for a while//

Wait, how could she possibly tell this? Even one second after it was gone, what evidence would there be of it? When it rains, I guess she might tell by how wet the ground is, but she's looking up.

>Indie, no!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>Lemon shook herself off, and stood as tall as she could.//

No comma.

>putting on an expression of determination//

Think of your perspective again. Lemon can't see this, so it's odd for her to evaluate it. She could say that's what she's attempting to do. But more immediate to her would be the actual feeling. So how does that affect her? That's what makes more sense to say. What thoughts are going through her head? What physical sensations does it cause? Put yourself in her place and say how you'd experience it, not something that's an external observation of it.

>Lemon placed her hand to her heart, and looked at Indigo.//

No comma.

>clearly flustered//

So give me more description of her that paints a picture of her as flustered. If you were a stage director, what would you tell your actress to do to get this across? A play doesn't have a narrator to tell the audience Indigo is flustered. It's entirely upon the actress to get that across. For the most part, written characters work best when they do the same. You give me the visual through which I can infer the emotion.

>once in awhile//

"Awhile" and "a while" aren't generally interchangeable. You do need it to be two words here so there's a noun to serve as the preposition's object.

>That was a pep talk worthy of me!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>"Yeah. I wonder,"//

You wouldn't bother putting any other end punctuation in the italics, though, unless the entire quote is italicized. So leave an ending comma, period, dash, or ellipsis outside the italics.

>Indigo batted away one of the little hearts popping up around Lemon's head.//

Okay, you're kind of going weird on the cartoon side. The actual movie didn't have these effects, and I couldn't tell if the raincloud was supposed to be some magical power Lemon had, but now it looks like you're going for cartoon logic. So I'll reiterate that the movie doesn't do this, and you're going for an even more serious tone than the movies, so this feels like a big step in the opposite direction.

>Lemon rubbed her hands together, excitedly.//

That excitedly is once again blunt, but it's also extraneous. She already comes across that way.

>She held her shirt away from her body//

This sure sounds like she's taken it off.

>Indigo peeled her shirt off and walked across the field to the locker room.//

O-kay. She has something on under it, I trust?

>It was white, and much smaller than before.//

Oh, wait, it's there permanently, even when she's in a good mood? That could be clearer. I'm not sure how the reader's supposed to figure that out before now, since her canon portrayal doesn't include it.

>She put her headphones on, and loaded a new playlist//

No comma.

>one that she had downloaded from Vinyl's player when they'd exchanged numbers//

Why didn't you mention it at the time? Did Vinyl suggest she grab it? Did Vinyl even know she did?

>The music started up, and the last bit of cloud whisked away.//

Oh, okay. It does go away.

Okay, aside from a tiny bit of blushing, I can't fathom why you tagged this as romance. There's no romance in it, and even the vague hints at such are completely extraneous to the plot. Not that that's really a problem. That kind of thing tends to get you downvotes from people who came in expecting all-out shipping and get barely a whisper of it. It's not exactly mistagged, and it's your risk to take. To wit, your like ratio is hovering below 20:1, and based on the quality of the writing alone, I would have bet on higher. That tag is probably hurting you a bit.

The more important point is the story that you start with and the one that actually finishes. They're both fine, but they don't really connect. It wouldn't be hard to address that, though. So let me look at the before and after pictures.

At the beginning, Lemon is moping around about how all her friends are in a bad mood, and she feels distant from them. Vinyl shows up and gets her to calm down by playing music. (For that matter, why was it necessary for them to listen while looking out the window? Nothing happens out there, and Vinyl even tells her to close her eyes at one point, so that she can't see anything outside. And it's only through serendipity that the window performs a function—she sees Indigo running out there, but Vinyl didn't set it up that way; she had no idea Indigo would even be out there.) So calmed, Lemon decides she wants to invite all her friends to a party to get them all to reconnect.

At the end, Lemon confronts Indigo, and she makes an argument at least related to the problem. It doesn't address that desire for a get-together, but it does address the root cause of what's bugging Indigo, so it would probably still achieve that desired effect. But she stops there, and this idea of a party is completely dropped. Tie those threads together!

Make some stronger connection that the calming effect of Vinyl's music has enabled Lemon to see the situation clearly and act to resolve it. Don't forget about that party. Indigo wants to take Lemon out for a shake, but what happened to the rest of the girls? You don't have to show all those interactions if you don't want to. It'd make the story significantly longer, and it might be hard to make them all seem necessary and interesting. But just indicating that she's going to have a similar talk with each of them is enough. It shows that she's going to solve the problem that was presented way back at the beginning of the story. As it is, she's re-engaged with Indigo, but she's forgotten about the others. The ending hits a different target than the beginning was shooting for, and there's nothing accomplished by the shift. I'd like to see you have thematic closure here. And it's as simple as this: Like I said, make it a little more clear that Lemon couldn't have thought of and implemented this plan if Vinyl hadn't calmed her down first. After Lemon makes up with Indigo, have her mention this plan of throwing a party to her, and Indigo says it's a good idea. Then the story closes with Lemon going off to talk to the others the same way she had with Indigo. Now you have a consistent plot arc, and all those pieces relate to it, for the price of only a couple paragraphs.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2723

Note that for a lot of the mechanical stuff, I only pointed out one or two examples of each kind of problem, not every instance of each. You should look for other instances of the same things, as in many cases, there were other spots that needed to be fixed.

>regardless of if you studies//

Typo.

>Valentine's day//

Capitalization.

>My only true love is the basketball game tomorrow?//

I can't figure why that's a question.

>My sport friend//

>the redhead//
People just don't think about others they know in such external, abstract terms.

>this- even in my head- that's//

Please use proper dashes, not hyphens.

>one-hundred percent//

As you've phrased it, hyphenate the whole thing.

>I'be//

Typo.

>...how fast does this girl work?//

When you have a leading ellipsis, you still capitalize after it if it's a new sentence. Only leave it lower-case if it's picking up from an earlier sentence that ended in an ellipsis.

>corner,a//

Needs a space.

>bouncy hair bounces//

It does, does it?

>'ol//

The missing letter is the "d" at the end. Why is the apostrophe on the beginning?

>I'm came here//

Phrasing is off.

>considering Pinkie//

Set off the participle with a comma.

>The pink-haired party animal//

Yeah, these kind of references just don't work for a limited narrator, and first person is as limited as it gets.

>cheesy I love you message//

cheesy I-love-you message or cheesy "I love you" message

>Me and my heart freeze.//

Somehow, I think Twilight knows grammar better than this.

>Stenson//

Stetson

>Her shining green eyes lock with my magenta ones.//

Why in the world would she mention her own eye color?

>I instinctively twirl a piece of my indigo hair//

Same deal with the hair. Why would she even notice the color? It's unimportant to her and irrelevant to what's happening.

>Yer spacin' off.//

I've always heard it as spacing out.

>Now, I'm gonna head out now//

Watch the close repetition.

>a one time thing//

one-time

>once in a lifetime sight//

once-in-a-lifetime

>I thought it was a phase that most people went through when that age came around where that part of you becomes aware to you.//

This is really awkwardly phrased.

I'm curious as to whether this is supposed to be happening before or after she falls for Timber Spruce.

>Applejack is one of my closest friends. She's kind, caring, hardworking, but what drew me towards her was her honesty. Her honesty is almost as beautiful as her. I see her honesty always shining through those vibrant green eyes.//

I have a feeling I'm going to need to refer to this passage later, so I'm marking it for now.

>Friendship has a theoretical 28% chance of ending if subject is not attracted to other girls but open minded, theorized 85% chance if subject hates girls attracted to other girls.//

Where is she getting those numbers? Her own estimation? Did she find some sort of statistics to support this?

>Option 3: kiss Applejack.//

I'm always taken aback at how common this is in fanfiction. You wouldn't do this in real life out of the blue. Not the least reason for which is that it might get you hit and possibly disciplined.

>You'r//

Typo.

>feels like the millionth time, I feel//

Repetitive.

>me and Spike can curl up//

Yeah, Twilight wouldn't get that wrong.

>I walk up to the home, nervously and with careful steps.//

>I adjust my glasses nervously.//
>Nervously, I set my backpack//
>that nervous feeling//
These all occur within the same screen, and the last two are in the same paragraph. I get the idea. You should avoid directly telling the reader how a character feels. If Twilight's nervous, how would she act? What would she look like? What questions and images would run through her mind? Think about how you can tell a stranger in the street is nervous. You want the reader observing the same clues you would. If you give the right clues, the reader will get the emotion you want him to without ever having to say it. Since that's how real life works, it comes across as much more authentic.

>a feel a blush//

Typo.

>the fashionista//

Another oddly external reference.

>But my nails are the least of my concern right now.

>
>Applejack is.//
I get what you're trying to say, but this doesn't say it. You're saying Applejack is the least of your concern.

>Even then, the darkness doesn't go away.//

Why would it? Glasses just change focus, not the light level.

>I slowly breath outwards.//

Typo.

>I can remember every time you took me to your family farm, and I can remember every time we went to the library together. All the times I tried out those delicious apple fritters I helped your family make, and all the times we picked out books together so we could read and talk about them.//

Okay, gonna mark this for later discussion as well.

>A candy heart.//

It's a nice pattern, but the way they'd been left so far is really haphazard. How could Applejack be sure Twilight would even see them? Only one of them had been reasonable so far.

Okay, summation time. I'll bring back in those two passages I marked. The first one lists a few qualities Twilight likes about Applejack, and the second lists a few specific activities they've done together. You're on the right track with those, but they show up awfully late in the story, they're fairly vague, and there's not a lot of them.

Before I elaborate, I'll refer you to someone else who already has. Aragon has written a series of blog posts about how to portray a realistic romance, and he's linked them off his user page. I think they're worth reading, and I think they'd help you here. The bottom line is that there needs to be a reasonable give and take here, that each one brings things into the relationship and gets things out of it. They have to have genuine reasons for wanting to be together, and they have to be more or less equals in it. That's a paraphrase, but I'll let Aragon do the heavy explaining. because he's put a lot more thought into it.

The way most authors do romance wrong is to expect me to care about the couple without ever giving me a reason to. Because I like MLP, I already like these characters and so have some interest in seeing them happy. But that's not enough for me to immediately believe they're in love. This is a very common plot you have going here, where one character harbors a secret crush, and when she finally acts on it, the other very conveniently admits she's also had a crush. Add in the "do I like girls?" gayngst, and your foundation is a collection of cliches. People do harbor secret crushes, but the odds against two secret crushes matching up are pretty big. It's still a common story type for Twilight to admit her crush and for Applejack to have never considered it before, but she agrees to give it a try. While cliched, it's still more realistic. Though that would obviously nullify the angle of the candy hearts. It's your story, and it's ultimately up to you what you're willing to change and by how much, but when you're writing the same thing the reader has seen done countless times before, it's incredibly hard to make your version stand out.

So let me get back to what I was saying earlier about why Twilight likes Applejack. The most cliched stories never even get to that. They expect me to buy into the relationship simply because the author says they're in love, but you've at least started down the road of justifying it. But like I said, it's well into the story before we get any of this. Start laying that groundwork right from the first paragraph. Sprinkle it regularly throughout the story. Twilight's mind should keep coming back to what she finds endearing about Applejack. That's part 1.

Part 2 is being specific. You also took a step in the right direction by listing those activities Twilight said she liked doing with Applejack. That way, it's not some big, vague "I like her." It shows the kinds of common interests they share. It suffers in the same ways as part 1, in that you only address it this one place in the story, it's buried way toward the end, and it's still a little on the vague side. An example always speaks far louder than a generalization. So give me more examples, and elaborate on them a bit. The time Twilight tried fritters. Don't leave it at just that. Give me a few sentences about it. How she took a bite, but it was still too hot, and she had to fan her mouth to keep from burning it, but once it cooled enough to swallow, it was so good! And Applejack must have seen the streak of cinnamon on Twilight's cheek, but it was a good hour later before Twilight noticed it on her reflection in the farm house's window. The reflection of her and Applejack walking side by side, the blonde hair like spun sunlight, and Twilight just knew it must smell like apple pie.

Maybe that rambled on a bit long, but you get the picture. I don't need an entire scene of it, but a few sentences to give me a vivid picture of how each one of those events happened, how they made Twilight feel close to Applejack, how Twilight started noticing how much she enjoyed the companionship and found her friend attractive. That adds so much life to it and really makes their relationship feel authentic. It's the right kind of detail in the right kind of places that can convince a reader of anything.

And then part 3. Because you're using Twilight as your perspective character, it's harder to get at what Applejack thinks and feels. The only two ways are for Twilight to read it from Applejack's behavior or for Applejack to say it outright, but like Aragon says, they need to be equals. By now, it's painfully obvious Twilight is in love with Applejack. You have to convince me of the other direction, too. And you don't have that at all. I just have to take your word for it. She hasn't demonstrated anything of the sort. Whether she just now decides to give Twilight a shot or she's also been harboring a secret crush, I need to know the same things from Applejack's side: What is it that she likes about Twilight? What does she find endearing? What does she expect their common interests to be? They don't talk until the end, and since you stay with Twilight as your limited narrator, this won't come out until late in the story, but it's an essential thing to include. Give me that same kind of evidence that Applejack loves Twilight.

That's how you stand out from the crowd, because most authors are content to assume any given reader will automatically believe in the romance. Problem is, that's making the reader do the author's job.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2738

>It seemed she wasn't the only pony who had difficulties to sleep tonight.//
The phrasing is off here. It should be "who had difficulty sleeping." And why does this specifically call out ponies? Spike isn't one. I get that she doesn't see him until she looks through the door, but who else would it be? Only a few characters might be there after hours, and even fewer with a male voice.

>was sat at a reading desk//

Phrasing is off again. "was sitting."

>not being able to prevent her mouth from speaking//

I don't understand her mindset here. She hasn't given a reason why she wouldn't want to speak.

>"Not this one too" he commented//

Missing a comma.

>I know Twi,//

In the middle of a sentence, direct address takes commas on both sides. This doesn't say that he's telling Twi he knows; it says he's acquainted with Twi.

>the same category than the Pinkie Sense//

The normal phrasing here is "as" instead of "than," and you don't need "the" in front of "Pinkie Sense."

>she lectured him//

I don't understand why she's angry. She might say he's not likely to reach a conclusion, but this makes it sound like he's doing something wrong by researching it.

>and instead, finished//

The only reason to have a comma there is if you had a new subject, but you don't, so it's all still one clause.

>then, looked straight//

Same thing as my previous comment.

>raising an eyebrow//

You'll normally set off participles with a comma.

>Once more, he took a moment to clear his thoughts.//

What does he do? This is stated as fact, and the story has been following Twilight's mindset so far, so this would require her to read his mind. What behavior does she see that leads her to this conclusion? Just give me that behavior and let me reach the conclusion myself.

>Are you sure Spike?//

Needs a comma for direct address.

Through this area, you're heavily concentrated on dialogue. Don't lose sight of the narration, or it becomes abstract, like they're talking in some featureless void. Let me see all the little nonverbal things that go on in a real conversation and the little things that happen in the background. It adds a lot of life to a conversation.

>Spike couldn’t hold it against her- after all//

Please use a proper dash for asides or interruptions. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>after all, he hadn’t be very clear about why he felt the urge to find some answers. Maybe it was time to stop beating around the bush.//

Hm. You started the scene with the narrator relaying Twilight's thoughts and impressions, but now you've shifted over to Spike. It's not a good idea to shift perspective around unnecessarily, abruptly, or often. So consider which viewpoint really is needed here. If you do want to shift it, it can be done, but it takes some experience. It's usually better to stick to one character per scene. So was it really necessary to start the scene with Twilight? Or do you really need to go with Spike here? Can you tell this scene from just one of their perspectives? It's still possible to get at how both feel; one of them will be internal impressions, and the other will be how the first character perceives and interprets their behavior.

>Pinkie promise//

That's a pretty unique thing. It'd likely be capitalized.

>He didn't add that he has felt from the rock the same feeling he had when he sometimes thought about Rarity.//

You have a shift into present tense here.

>But the idea was so alien to her that she could only stare at her little friend, mouth slightly agape.//

See, you're going right back into Twilight's head. If you had an omniscient narrator, it's easier to jump around, but you have to keep things factual and attribute all opinions to the characters in that case. Your narrator takes on a more personal voice that that when he's speaking for Twilight or Spike.

>Seeing her stare and her mouth slightly agape, Spike concluded Twilight wasn’t convinced.//

Beware feeding me the conclusion. Just give me the evidence.

>He didn't insist, preferring to wait patiently for the young alicorn to end her brainwork.//

And you're back in Spike's head again. This keeps skipping back and forth. Also consider that a narrator in his perspective essentialy gives m his thoughts, so you'e having him refer to Twilight as "the young alicorn." People just don't think about others they know in such abstract terms. They think of friends and acquaintances by name, pronoun, or some kind of descriptor that defines their relationship. You wouldn't think of your grandfather as "the gray-haired man," would you?

>she said in a joyful tone//

Rather than just say she's joyful, let me see her acting joyful so I'll conclude it on my own. It feels more realistic when you paint the picture and I interpret it, since that's how people interact in real life. We don't have a narrator telling us how people feel; we have to figure it out through observation.

>If you are right Spike//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>like I did for -you!//

That should be a dash, except I don't quite get what's cutting her off here. There isn't an abrupt change in her train of thought.

>Imagine Spike//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>take a good sleep//

A more typical phrasing would be something like "get a good night's sleep."

>They had sent a letter to Ember that morning to ask her if she could receive them today//

Needs a comma here, since a new clause is beginning. There's a brief explanation of why at the top of this thread in the discussion called "comma use with conjunctions."

>"Brace yourself" warned Twilight.//

Missing comma.

>Twilight,nodding//

Missing a space.

>"Indeed your Highness."//

Needs a comma for direct address, and the "your" would also be capitalized, since it's part of the honorific "Your Highness."

>I think that we would be more comfortable with a drink, don't you think//

Pretty repetitive use of "think."

>Spike noticed the appetizing gemstones//

Needs a comma after this.

>but he pushed his gluttony away//

And this.

>each one of them lost in their thoughts/

Spike and Twilight already had time to think about it. I'm not sure why anyone but Ember would do so now.

>Spike had tried to bring the subject//

Awkward phrasing.

>egg?"Twilight//

Missing a space.

>I'm still young//

Needs a comma after this.

>in shame//

It's common for authors to directly identify an emotion in a phrase like this, but it's often redundant with something else already there. Her blushing and turning away already relates this mood, so you don't need to say it.

>may had avoided//

Typo.

>but that’s over now//

Set this off with a comma.

>one of my hypothetic subject//

one of my hypothetical subjects

>a disturbing smile of a predator//

The first "a" should be "the," but don't tell me it's disturbing. Describe it and let me see it for myself. You're also using Spike as your perspective character here, so he's the one who finds it disturbing. Wouldn't that make him decide something was wrong here and be cautious?

>laying lazily//

lying

>from jewels to golden candlesticks//

Odd for you to single out candlesticks here, unless you're going to list a lot more of the kinds of objects he has. Otherwise, it makes it sound like he obsesses about them in particular.

>but now she was closer to him than she had never been//

Needs a comma before this, and the phrasing is off. You need "ever" here, not "never."

>he was really, really big//

But she'd seen Ember next to him before, so she already had a good size reference.

>he hadn't been able to prevent fear from giving his voice a whisky tone//

So describe how it sounds. And I don't know what "whisky" means here. Are you saying he's drunk?

>don't oblige me to make you comply/

That's awfully formal language. She didn't talk like this in the episode.

>what is this egg//

what this egg is

>but that wasn't making him smaller.//

Set this off with a comma.

>you Lordship//

Set this off with a comma, and it's "Your Lordship."

>And how will you do that little one?//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>grinning//

Set off the participle with a comma.

>"Spike!" whispered Twilight loudly,//

That comma needs to be a period, since the following quoted passage starts a new sentence.

>three hours flight//

three-hour flight

>He hadn't expressed any enthusiasm nor interest, settling for listening.//

That isn't a "nor" situation. Use "or."

>The rock farm was in sight//

Needs a comma here.

>Twilight pointed to the group//

Just say "Twilight pointed out." This phrasing is confusing.

>Torch was last//

Needs a comma here. But why wouldn't he land first? He's the one who needs the most space. The rest could easily land around him.

>made the alicorn and the two dragons jumped//

jump. But this is another of those odd references. I can't tell yet who holds the perspective in this scene, but whoever it is would know all the character well enough that they wouldn't need to call them this.

>even less dragons//

The typical phrasing is "much less dragons."

>"We came because of Holder's Boulder" answered Twilight.//

Missing comma.

>"They are…,"//

On this one, you don't need the comma when you already have some other end punctuation. The comma only replaces a period.

>she cut her.//

That's violent. I suppose you meant "she cut her off," except you ended Twilight's dialogue with an ellipsis. A cutoff would be indicated with a dash.

>I didn't silly//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I've never heard there had been any earthquake here before//

But in the episode, Limestone said Applejack had planted the flag on a fault line, which pretty much means there had to have been an earthquake there at some point. Maybe not in Pinkie's lifetime, but it must have happened sometime, and with Maud's knowledge of geology, she'd probably be able to tell when.

>so let's hurry//

Set this off with a comma.

>every Pies//

every Pie

>was waiting them//

was waiting for them

>from what we have gathered, it seems more than probable//

What have they gathered though? It's just a feeling Spike has, so I don't know how that makes it probable.

>My ancestors have found it here//

Remove the "have," or it means his ancestors are still in the process of finding it there.

>shout Limestone//

The verb form is off.

>Torch had picked Holder's Boulder//

picked up

>looking closely to the rock//

looking closely at the rock

>his look completely enthralled//

Don't say he's enthralled. Show me how he looks and acts.

>A small smile began to creep on his face, which soon became a thunderous laughter.//

What does the "which" refer to? The smile? His face? Neither one becomes the laughter.

>open mouthed//

Hyphenate.

>such a giant creature genuinely laughing//

I don't understand why his size makes it seem remarkable that he could laugh.

>after Torch had calm down//

calmed

>egg shaped//

Hyphenate.

>Welcome among Equestria Irony!//

Use "to" instead of "among," and it needs a comma for direct address.

>asked Spike to Torch//

Spike asked Torch

>except for Torch//

Needs a comma after this.

>It is a long story my little dragon//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>which dates from a thousand years or so//

Phrasing is off. There's nothing saying when this thousand years is. Presumably, in the past.

>a young and candid dragon//

"Candid" is a really strange word choice here. I'm not sure what you meant to say.

>sobbing on Maud's shoulder//

Set off the participle with a comma.

>Don't be sad pink pony//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>It happened a while ago//

Needs a comma here.

>I heard that the dragon has moved on since//

That's kind of a flippant end. And very convenient that he not only figured out what the rock was, but he knows the specific instance. Plus everything was a well-known legend, except how it turned out was more a rumor or item of gossip? It doesn't match up. He does go on to explain what happened, but the "I heard" doesn't quite work here.

>his gift has remained//

Needs a comma after this.

>not only ponies have//

not only have ponies

This conversation is losing the narration again. Check out the section on "talking heads" at the top of this thread.

>unbelieving//

Make him act this way.

>as everyone was pondering the revelations//

This is very vague and glib sounding.

>to broke it//

break

>new informations//

"Information" is a collective term. It's already plural.

>patronizing//

What he says doesn't sound patronizing at all, so I don't know why he'd look that way.

>allowing smiles to appear more often than what she was used to//

This is oddly phrased, and I'm not sure whether she's referring to her own smiles, Torch's, or everyone's.

>It was all thanks to Pinkie Pie, this pony really had a gift to make someone smile.//

Comma splice.

>Laying outside the house//

Lying.

>he was enjoying that moment//

You only spent one paragraph in Ember's perspective and now you're already going to Torch's.

>and Torch watched the shadow landing in front of him//

Set this off with a comma, and use "land."

>Good evening Torch//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>quietly//

Move this to the end of the sentence, and "the black alicorn" is another oddly impersonal reference for a limited narrator.

>each other eyes//

each other's eyes

>afflicted by the banality of her own words//

I don't even know what this would mean, but it's better to demonstrate it anyway instead of just telling me she feels this way.

>My body may haven't changed//

Needs a comma here.

>My sister was well aware of your feelings//

Needs a comma here.

>looking away//

Set off the participle with a comma.

>where there wasn't any stars or Moon//

weren't

>All your prose won't make up for the thousand years of waiting Luna.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I'm deeply sorry Torch.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>but at least, I expected a friend//

You don't need that comma.

>Why showing yourself only now?//

show

>His voice was less of an order and more of a request.//

This is pretty self-evident. It's not phrased anything like an order.

>Long talks would be needed, they had a thousand years to catch.//

The phrasing is way off here. I think you meant something like it would take them a lot of talking to catch up on a thousand years.

>each other company//

each other's company

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2754

Right off the bat, I'm seeing a lot of repetitive sentence structure. It's not until the end of the fourth paragraph, or the eighth sentence, that you start with anything but the subject. A lot of them are about the same length, too, which all combines to give it the feel of what we call a "list of actions." You seem to have a habit of this, but it improves a little further into the story. The other mitigating factor is that dialogue tends to help break up this effect, so once you get to the parts of the story that have some, it's not as noticeable. It's still worth making a pass and seeing if you can vary your narrative sentence starters a bit more.

>I stomped forward to keep his momentum going, and waited until he bumped into the door before I lit my horn.//

>Then I threw it open, and watched as he fell in a heap on the sidewalk.//
>I topped it off, and spooned a dollop of vanilla icing in afterward//
I bet I'm going to see a lot of this. You don't need these commas, because they just separate verbs that are linked to the same subject. Use a comma when it separates clauses, where each verb is linked to a different subject. So it's "He does this and does that," but it's "He does this, and he does that." I'm not going to mark any more of these. They're just the ones I saw on the first page or so. You get it right as much as not, and there's some artistic license allowed for flow and cadence, but I'm not feeling it with these ones.

>50%//

Write out the words.

>She’ll probably just tell me to make friends with all these weirdos.//

Maybe you'll get to this later in the story (and if you do, I'll surely forget to come back and edit this comment out), but my first reaction is that she'd gleefully say the princess of friendship must be willing to meet all these wierdos who so desperately want to be friends with her.

>She stuck the towel in her ear//

It's really obtrusive to refer to a third-person character at the beginning of a scene by pronoun before we have any other sort of descriptor for her, be it a name or even something generic like "the mare," since pronouns work by antecedent. Particularly with your first-person narrator, it creates the feeling I should already know who you're talking about because of the conversational style. You wouldn't do this in a real conversation, after all, and a first-person narrator is having a conversation with the reader, more or less.

>The door jingled as another customer trotted through the door.//

Kind of repetitive use of "door," but I can't help thinking you meant to use "bell" for the first one.

>I’ve never had anypony try to pay, before//

You don't need that comma. You typically only set off adverbs with a comma when they come at the beginning of a clause.

>I glanced over my shoulder as I heard her gasp.//

This chapter is showing just as much repetitive structure in the narration's sentences. It's natural to have a lot of sentences in first person that begin with "I," so it's a good idea to avoid it where you can. Not just sentences, but paragraphs too. This is your eighth paragraph of the chapter, but it's already the sixth to start with "I."

>she’ll ask//

Put that in past tense.

>She looked up at me with an expression somewhere between terror and awe.//

Describe it to me in a way that I can picture it. You're making me do all the work.

>Whoah//

There is a surprising majority of authors who don't know how to spell this. Please don't be one of them.

>single, dramatic//

You don't need a comma between adjectives when they're hierarchical. To spare you the long explanation, if they describe different aspects and would sound really awkward in reverse order, you probably don't need the comma.

>I’m pretty good at those//

You've gone to present tense again, and it's done in a way that tends to make it sound like she's actually talking to the reader. That opens a big can of worms that's not worth dealing with, as you'd have to establish who I am to her and why she's telling me the story. It's far easier to leave it as internal musings to an undefined an unimplied audience.

>Fun fact.//

This is kind of the same. Her explanation of how to make a yeast donut was fine, as it could actually be thinking about that on her own. It lends a sense that she's not particularly engaged with what Ravenwing is saying, and it's fine in present tense, since it's something that continues to be true, not a one-time occurrence. But then tacking this on the end makes it sound far more like it's said for someone else's benefit who's a party to her internal thoughts, and that creates the same audience problem I just talked about.

>I swear, I could hear her soul deflate.//

Same thing. If you left it all as past tense (I swore), it's still all consistent. The second part wouldn't make sense in present tense, so the possibility of having this entirely present is moot, but the way you've mixed tenses, it's like she's sitting there telling me the story now (I swear) about things that happened in the past ("I could hear" versus "I can hear"). And you haven't done anything to define my role as an audience, plus the way the story is delivered would have a lot of trouble working within that frame anyway, for a couple of reasons. You're not delivering the past events as flashbacks, but Twilight is also relating the kind of detail, including speech that's remembered word for word well enough for her to present it as quotes, that isn't reasonable for something told even hours or days after it happened. You're even inconsistent about it, since there are others of these little observations stuck in that are still past tense.

>I didn’t turn around because I didn’t want to see the way I was sure she was looking at me.//

And for the first time, one that doesn't have a comma but needs one.

>hot, soapy//

These are also hierarchical adjectives and don't need a comma.

>trotted into the living room, plopping down//

Note that participles make things happen at the same time, but she couldn't plop down until after she'd trotted in there.

>this is the first time I’d ever had another pony in my apartment//

You're in present tense again.

>I felt myself blush a bit.//

A tad repetitive with her noticing Ravenwing blushing. The trick with repetition is to make it obvious it's intentional. For instance, if you emphasized "myself" here, it calls attention to the fact it's been repeated, which makes it clear that it's on purpose.

>said, “Because you said//

Not the best choice of speaking verb when it appears so soon after in the dialogue.

>I will give her this, though: she may be crazy, but she can follow directions like she’s not an idiot.//

Present tense again.

>Most ponies are a bit awed the first time they see Celestia in the flesh. But I suppose when you’re planning to ascend to her level, that makes the meeting a bit more… momentuous.//

And again. Plus that's "momentous."

>she’s coming over here!//

When a word is italicized for emphasis, you'll normally include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>My words trailed off//

That's already evident from the fact that her dialogue ended in an ellipsis, so narrating it as well is redundant.

>What’s wrong.//

That's a question, isn't it?

>Besides, it’s not my fault that she’s so, so… Intimidating.//

You don't need to capitalize that last word, as it still parses as part of the same sentence.

>She likes to do that.//

Gone to present tense again.

>What— How//

Don't leave a spae after the dash.

>tonight. Why don’t you stay with me tonight//

Kind of repetitive word use.

>A mare in my, uh, situation occasionally has need of a method to move an unconscious pony. Don’t ask.//

And now you're explicitly making conversation with the reader. You do this so irregularly in the story and without setting it up that it's just not working well.

>D-E-S-S—.//

Don't put a period there. The dash is already end punctuation.

>it’s a good thing//

Present tense again.

>“I don’t” —she rested her forehead on a hoof— “I don’t//

Don't leave those spaces around an em dash.

>Seeing it in person was a bit more breathtaking than the photographs I’d collected.//

Wait a minute. She's collected all this intel on Twilight Sparkle, even gone to her parents' house, and she says she's travelled a fair amount for her catering business. And she hasn't ever been to Ponyville since the castle formed?

>Spike —little purple baby dragon, first mentioned page 1 in the executive summary, dedicated chapter starts page 73— jogged//

No spaces around the dashes, and write out the number.

>Here we go.//

Here's the time to make something an italicized thought. This would sound weird rendered in past tense, but in present, it's not meshing with even the occasional addressing the reader, since this is an in-the-moment comment and not said in retrospect.

>Style number 73//

Write out the number again, and I wonder if it's psychologically telling that you chose the same number as the page Spike's on.

>She looked confused, and maybe a bit offended.//

So describe it to me. I get the meaning but none of the experience if you just tell me.

>she” —Copper jabbed a hoof at me— “pony//

>Glimmer —first mention page 184, Twilight Sparkle’s first and current apprentice— trotting//
Take out the spaces around the dashes.

>looked at me with a “told-you-so” sort of look//

So she looked with a look, you say?

>Turns out I’m the evil one.//

Gone to present tense.

>Sparkle looked confused again.//

And I want to know what it looks like again.

>Sparkle and Starlight both looked at me, mouths agape, then looked//

There are a lot of uses of some form of "look" lately.

>I guess she’s seen too many//

More present tense.

>lay my head down//

When you have a direct object, it's "laid."

>and slash or//

I'd recommend hyphenating that so it's more immediately clear how to parse it.

>She said something but it didn’t register in my brain.//

Needs a comma.

>24 hours//

Spell it out.

>I’m back to that train of thought again//

>I’m surprised to hear myself say//
Present tense again.

>annoyingly-cheerful//

Don't hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb.

>she hasn’t shut up//

>She seems… brighter//
Present tense.

>I feel like this is the terrible, squishy, emotional moment that I was afraid would happen. And you know what? It didn’t bother me that much.//

Present tense and addressing the reader again.

This is a very cute story, and I'd love to post it. It's got two areas it needs work on, though. One, it's got a lot of excess commas. Two... well one and a half. I like the way Sprinkle unknowingly befriends Copper, but it could maybe use a little more of Sprinkle's thought process as to why she picks this particular pony to drag off to see Sparkle out of the many she could have. What's different about her? Simply that she talked to her and inadvertently got a little more back story on her than she had with others? She's still not going to realize until later that she was actually becoming friends, but the reader still sees what's happening. As you have it, though, it feels a tad serendipitous while it's happening, not that there's something subconscious going on. It's not like there's a huge twist that you have to keep hidden. In that case, it's often more satisfying to see the gradual change happening rather than get it retroactively.

And two. The story can't decide on its delivery method. Most of it's in a standard limited past tense, in which the narration can be taken as the character musing to herself as things happen. But switching to present tense for the more meta observations and addressing the reader directly speak more to a situation where the reader is a defined entity, and Sprinkle is sitting down with me some time after all this happened to tell me about it. That's an entirely different story mechanic, and it takes establishing who I am to her, why she wants to tell me, why I want to hear it, and under what circumstances she's telling me. That's usually done as a frame story around everything, and like I said earlier, it doesn't make sense for her to retain such detailed knowledge of events that long afterward, so storytellers tend to speak more in summary (which can be very hard to keep entertaining) or use flashback scenes to show me these past events "live," occasionally punctuated with short scenes in the "present" where she interacts with her audience. The vast majority is a standard narrative type, so it'd be far easier to edit the few bits that don't conform than to recast it to account for the audience.

If not for that last issue, I would have approved the story and left you to fix the detailed stuff while you were waiting for it to get posted, but the audience issue does create an odd dissonance that I want to see ironed out. That's a small enough part of the story that I wouldn't have to give it a full read again, so you can mark it as "back from Mars" when you resubmit.

Lastly, a word about publishing. Our normal requirement is for an initial submission of a chaptered story to be at least 3k words, which would mean posting your first four chapters at once. That said, it's more from our perspective that we want to see that much so we can make sure the quality holds up long enough. Since we've seen in excess of 3k, I'm fine with letting your first post be shorter than that, and if people complain, we can say we've already seen the whole thing. But your plan to post a chapter a day isn't going to maximize its exposure. You will (I think) fit within FiMFiction's limitations on how often you can possibly show up in the update slots of the feature box, as long as you post slightly later each day, even by just a few minutes. But getting a tie-in audience from EqD won't happen with that frequency, since we don't usually have a story updates post every day.

So I'll tell you how to post updates to EqD, in case you don't know. When you add a new chapter, send an email to the main box (submit@equestriadaily.com) with a subject line of "STORY UPDATE: The Donutier." Include a link to the story's EqD page, which saves the blog folks from having to look it up. They'll put it in a story updates post. This is why updating daily doesn't maximize your exposure. Since we don't do an updates post every day, several of your new chapters will get lumped into a single updates post, and the more times you get to be in an EqD post, the more readers will see it. Personally, I'd recommend posting a new chapter the day after the previous one has been in an update post, which would run about every 3 days. But that's up to you. When the story is complete, do the same thing, but use "STORY COMPLETE" in the email subject line, and you'll get another solo post.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2755

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the pony that threw this to the ground//

This was a consistent problem in your previous draft, and while it's a minor thing overall, I would like you to get into the habit of using "who" instead of "that" when you're talking about sentient creatures.

>Equestria Daily Sun//

Newspaper titles would be underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>few obviously foriegn//

You don't need that comma as the adjectives describe different aspects.

>first name terms//

First-name would take a hyphen, since you're using the whole phrase as a single descriptor.

>The Captain//

>the sergeant//
Be consistent about capitalizing ranks. Normally, these would be usages that call for lower-case.

>shook his head as if he could shake//

Kind of repetitive.

>asked Rarity curiously//

Doesn't the fact that she asked make it self-explanatory that she's curious?

>that it all been a nightmare//

Missing word.

>Their expressions were mirrored on the face of the marshal first class stood guard outside Southgate//

Seems like there's a missing word here, too.

>Place grounds//

Typo.

>Guten abend//

I haven't been paying attention so far, but do you intend Nocturnal Equestrian to be like German in that the nouns are capitalized? If so, you missed one here.

>Her guide smiled in return//

For a few paragraphs starting here, there are a ton of "to be" verbs, which just brings the action to a grinding halt.

>das erste Pony//

You still have a bit of a gender cross here. "Das" is neuter, but "erste" has a feminine adjective ending.

>You’ll just have to pick up on the details we go along.//

Missing word.

>look the Inquisitor gave her wouldn’t have looked//

Watch the close word repetition.

>smiled down from them from the Moon//

One of those "from"s should be an "at."

>with the enforcing the//

Extraneous word.

>Who with//

"With whom," if Twilight uses proper grammar, and I think she probably does.

>as if there as//

Typo. I marked this one last time. In fact, you've missed a couple things I marked before. Like how you normally italicize foreign languages, but you left it in normal font once early in chapter 2.

>in the hope that the sentence was similar enough in both languages that an accent was all that was needed//

It gets really clunky to have three "that" clauses in a row.

>She couldn’t see hair nor hide//

That's essentially a double negative. It'd be "She could see neither hair nor hide" or "She couldn’t see hair or hide."

>to enquire further//

You only use "enquire" four times in chapter 3, but the first three all occur within a few paragraphs of each other.

>Wie gehts//

That usually has an apostrophe (wie geht's), since it's a contraction of "wie geht es."

>the pony that did this to you//

Who, not that.

>waiting transfer//

Awaiting

>her mental image also included Daring Do amongst the students, fast asleep, drool running down her blue cheeks//

I marked this last time. I don't understand it in the least. Daring Do is tan, not blue. If there's supposed to be some hidden meaning here, it's lost on me.

>as she walked passed the unicorn//

Past/passed confusion.

>happen. Normally, nothing would have happened//

Watch the repetition.

>in a gesture for Rarity calm down//

Missing word.

>but the Nocturnal Equestrian had failed to mention Glimmer was imprisoned in Free Cloudsdale until the last moment//

I'd recommend putting the "until the last moment" after "failed to mention," or else it sounds like Glimmer was moved to Cloudsdale at the last moment,

>a wavering second hoof//

You just described her voice as wavering.

>the white unicorn//

Why would Rarity refer to herself in such an abstract and external manner?

>but seeing as this was Free Cloudsdale//

Needs a comma before this.

>who much further is the prison//

How, right?

>apologised//

Same problem with the "enquire" from last chapter. You only use this 5 times in chapter 4, but 4 of them are all within a page of each other, and those 4 are all used as exactly the same speech tag.

>the pony in the booth as a unicorn//

Typo.

>He was a turquoise blue and his white mane settled into a strange ice-cream-like swirl.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>don’t you, dad//

As a term of address, a family relation gets capitalized.

>the mare that arrested me//

>the tyrants that think they can rule over us//
>You’re the only pony that knows such a spell.//
Who/that

>using Nocturnal Equestria’s official name//

I don't get what you mean here. She didn't say it, and there's no obvious place she would have (in that strange way you have of giving me in-the-moment dialogue, then narrating that some other dialogue occurred without actually showing it to me, that is).

>They are everywhere and can go everywhere.//

It's not until I got here that I realized I have no idea what Concordia is.

>grey-sweater//

Why'd you hyphenate that?

>with an obeisant bow of his head//

That's such an unusual word that it sticks out like a sore thumb. I remember seeing it just a couple pages ago. When you have fancy word like this, you have to go pretty long before repeating them.

>It was a shame she couldn’t invite Moon Dancer, goodness knows that mare deserved it.//

Comma splice.

>Thunderlane apologised profusely—a string of apologetic statements//

Sounds self-explanatory.

>Inquisitor’s right eye//

Missing word.

>she laughed nervously at that//

This needs to be capitalized. It has no speaking verb.

>She shrugged off her saddlebags, and fished out a navy blue modern-style caparison out of them.//

No need for that comma. It's all one clause.

>as she gave the caparison one more look//

You're using a fair number of "as" clauses lately. You're also using "caparison" so often that it's getting grating. I don't even have a clue what one is, and other than some sort of garment, there's no context. So I can either ignore it and move on without knowing or leave the story to go look it up. Neither one is good.

>wordless agreement, before she fell into step beside her new companion. The two of them trotted through the streets wordlessly//

Repetitive.

>hoof steps//

That'd be one word, same as "footsteps."

>‘Perhaps’,//

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>gave way to abandoned buildings. These in turn gave way to abandoned warehouses//

I can't tell if that repetition is intentional. It doesn't really call attention to itself the way thematic repetition would,

>once thriving/

Hyphenate.

>ironically legal in its use of colours//

"Its" is singular, but the antecedent is plural.

>ponies that didn’t know their own place//

who/that

>Flam pulled open a drawer, and plucked out a book.//

You don't need that comma.

>Daring Do books//

That's just a character, not a title. You don't italicize those.

So there are still a fair number of detailed things, but that's not too surprising, since you added a chapter.

There are a lot of things I mentioned last time that haven't been changed much, if at all. I do like that you tell me it was a human killed far earlier, so it doesn't feel like a pointless reveal. The rest are, I admit, subjective-ish things, and maybe they just bother me more than they wold anyone else. So I asked another pre-reader to give me a second opinion.

He's not someone who understands German or Dutch, so a lot of that dialogue was lost on him, when there was no context given to imply a translation. He also couldn't fathom why you changed the language for both main parts of the city. Having one different is fine, but why both? What does it add? If one side spoke English, I don't see how it would affect the story at all. For your source material, it's fine for the author to have both sides speak foreign languages if they want, since there's still context for such a thing to exist on Earth. But in Equestria? Where the show has them speaking English? I don't understand why you'd change that.

He was also mystified about the humans. You do say the victim is one earlier on now, but even with the benefit of reading an additional chapter you hadn't published last time, there's still no justification as to why humans are here at all. They just are, and we have to accept it. They turn up a bit in chapter 5, but still no background on how Earth and Equestria came into contact, why all this is happening... Maybe you get to this later, but the reader's only going to give you so much leeway. 20k words and 5 chapters is a really long time to string the reader along without starting to explain things. Ideally, you want to work in explanations gradually, but from the start, rather than hold it for ransom. There are even ways to make withholding information like this work, but none of the perspective characters have been given a motivation to avoid even thinking about it.

You do a better job of defining the jargon this time around, but it takes the reader a little while to get used to it to the point they become fluent, so when you start throwing around "homotopic" and "heterotopic" every other sentence in places, it makes me pause and think about what each means and what the implications of each are. That's a big speed bump to the reader.

It's a shame, because this is a very interesting world, and you've definitely got writing ability. But when two of us agree that it just leaves us scratching our heads, it's not a good sign.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2764

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

There are some oddities right away. For one, the language gets quite repetitive. You use similar descriptions several times, like how all the statue-like rows of ponies are standing there, and how machine-like and precise it is. But then you describe it as unnerved, which doesn't quite fit, since you don't make anything out of that contrast. It's just a contradiction that isn't played for a point. Eventually it does settle into highlighting that contradiction, but it takes a couple pages.

>regulating the temperature regularly//

Here's a specific example of close word repetition.

>three… ”//

Don't leave a space before closing quotation marks.

>Some way down from the hangar, was a battlefield.//

No reason to have that comma.

>snow riddled//

You're using that whole phrase as a single descriptor, so hyphenate it.

It's an odd quirk of perspective that she refers to herself as "the construct." That's a very external way of thinking about herself. People just don't do that. Maybe this AI is different, but the narrative tone so far hasn't supported this disassociated self-view.

>long ranged//

Hyphenate.

>a new cover of snow//

You just used some other kind of "cover" in the previous sentence.

>Explosions and flak rocked the trenches//

What's flak doing near trenches? It's an antiaircraft weapon.

This second scene doesn't really have an identifiable perspective, which is strange after the tight one the first scene had.

>back-”//

Please use proper dashes for cutoffs and asides//

>Uneasy looks//

>Several apprehensive looks//
Besides being repetitive that close together, it's a bad idea to bluntly inform the reader of character emotion instead of demonstrating it through how the characters look and act.

>Twilight Sparkle//

And I'm left with a mystery as to what this means. I have no idea which side she would have favored, and aside from some vague proclamations of how legendary she is, I have no idea what help she would bring either side, and if she's fighting for a side she would have opposed, how they could have made her do that.

>Magi Ward//

Why does one pony have a plural title? That's like saying "Lieutenants Bolt."

>frozen meat mixed in with the scent of oil and fire//

You made almost exactly the same comment in the first scene.

>These were real, feeling ponies.

>
>A strange feeling//
Just another example of close repetition.

>The ones that did obey ManeFrame, however, were quickly cut down by what she supposed was their enemies.//

You're kind of all over the map as to whether these are supposed to be formidable weapons.

>she couldn’t possibly had known//

Typo.

You've referred to both ManeFrame and the less advanced ones as "the construct," so it's pretty confusing to tell which one you're talking about at times.

>ManeFrame panicked//

She just said her armor was basically impenetrable. What's she so afraid of?

For that matter, you've been using ManeFrame as your perspective character. If she's panicked (which you go on to repeat in the next paragraph), why doesn't she sound panicked? The narrative tone is completely calm.

>pegasi stallion//

Noun adjuncts are singular. You don't say "hams sandwiches," for instance.

>a pegasi//

You keep trying to use that as a singular term.

>She didn’t need to say it out loud, by exercising her vocal capacities helped her think clearer.//

Jumbled phrasing.

>as that was what they were called//

That's self-explanatory, since, y'know, that's what you're calling them.

>Whole databases cannot explain the chill that ran down her spine when she spied the endless rows of turrets and batteries that lined the hull of the airship.//

It's been in full view the whole time, and she presumably has knowledge of what it is.

>circle was carved into the bulkhead and the circle//

More repetition.

>imploded its now shared interior with the second airship. The clash of twisted metal seemed to bend outward//

If it's imploding (what would cause it to do that anyway?), why is it bending outward?

>what the sun might’ve looked like//

Why don't they know what it looks like?

>ammunitions//

That's a collective term. It doesn't have a plural.

>chosen to forgone//

Verb form is off.

>t-those//

Consider what sound he'd actually repeat. There isn't a "t" sound in that word.

>We saw Sparkle falling east of here, not far from our position.//

From that far away, they could tell it was her, but not that she had armor on?

>The vigil Lieutenant//

I can't figure out what you're trying to say. Did you mean "vigilant"?

>walking off with the Magi//

This bit doesn't parse.

>She laid there//

Lay/lie confusion.

>unleashed an unholy amount of flak at the Glider//

What's the point of something as low-tech as flak when they have all these energy weapons?

>A sign hang//

Typo.

>A grimace quickly crossed face when she opened it, the squeal metal on metal echoed beyond the entrance to the building.//

Comma splice, two missing words. You have quite a few of these areless kinds of errors.

>was no coordinates//

You have a number of agreement problems like this, too, where you have a mix of singular and plural.

>it was impossibly dark outside//

Why does the dark matter to her? With all her technology, visual light is really her only means of navigation?

>She looked around in the dark interior, and despite her penetrating optical sensors//

So she can find her way in the dark. Now you've contradicted your earlier statement.

>brows frowning//

I don't even understand how a brow can frown.

>stoneworks//

That's a collective term. It doesn't need to be plural.

>An unfounded fear, she found//

That just sounds strangely contradictory.

>In her state, she didn’t give any thought as to why the beacon was still broadcasting after at least decades of abandonment.//

Then why was she even looking for a medical facility in a completely abandoned town?

>extremely guarded ponies//

I don't think that means what you intended it to mean.

>somewhere behind some rubble//

That's needlessly vague.

>pair of quartets//

Awkwardly phrased.

>pure adulterated//

That's an oxymoron.

>an almost alarmingly fast rate//

Alarming to whom? ManeFrame is your perspective character, so presumably her, though she doesn't seem alarmed by it.

>suppressed gunponies//

I don't know what you're trying to say here. This doesn't make sense.

Many of your semicolons are misused. You should be able to replace one with a period, but in many cases, one of the resulting sentences would be a fragment.

>begun//

You use this for the wrong verb tense in more than one place.

>before long her canter transformed into a full gallop. Before long//

More close repetition.

>ManeFrame herself was trying to catch her breath//

But... she doesn't breathe, does she?

>She swilled around rapidly//

I don't think "swilled" is the word you meant to use.

>The stallion, meanwhile, looked conflicted as he watched the metallic mare, his face half contorted by guilt and half by shock.//

You're really bluntly identifying emotion here.

>His sternness from before gone, and almost feeling relaxed//

Why are you switching from her perspective to his? The second part of that sentence isn't something she'd know, unless you frame it as her interpretation, but before now, you'd been using her perspective.

>Lil’//

Li’l

The plot seems fine. I'm a little lost as to what's going on, and to a degree that puts the reader in the same boat as ManeFrame, except that she does know more than she's letting on. It's hard to say how well the plot is going, since we've barely gotten into it. There's not much else to say beyond what else kept popping up in the detailed comments. So there are lots of scattered editing issues, lots of strange phrasings, repetitive word and phrase usage, and some places where the story's logic doesn't hold up.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2765

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I've scanned my matrix a thousand times over and everything seems to be in relative operational order.//

You need a comma between the clauses, since each verb gets a different subject.

>Where do I begin?//

This whole paragraph. Look, I've seen plenty of stories where the narrator talks directly to the reader and is aware of his audience. There are tricks to getting that to work, but you're just springing this without framing it in any way. So your narrator is talking to me and knows I'm here. That opens a huge can of worms relative to the usual generic undefined audience implied for any given story. Now there's an explicit audience, so "undefined" isn't good enough anymore. Who is this audience? Why do they want to hear this story? Why does the narrator want to tell it? Under what circumstances is he telling it? All that's usually accomplished through some sort of framing device. It's one thing if the narrator is musing to the air or to himself, but he's pretty clearly speaking to someone, and you never establish who or why. That's a pretty important piece that a story told in this way needs, and there are other caveats that come with it.

That said, you try. At first it sounds like he's addressing his Guardian, though a few questions he asks wouldn't seem to fit that well. But then he goes on to explain who his Guardian is and how the system works, and it discusses her in a way that's no longer with her or anyone in the organization as the intended audience, so it's inconsistent with how the framing device starts out. And when you have a nonstandard delivery like this, consistency is the key, both in that it hold together and that it maintains a constant way of doing so.

>The machine certainly warped reality around its zenith; similarly to how a Taken tear in reality might, only with further reaching consequences.//

Misused semicolon. It's not a list delimiter, and what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence. This is a recurring problem.

>becoming more acute the nearer we became//

Watch close word repetition like this.

>with my blue hard-light proboscis//

Given the events he's describing, how is it relevant what color his nose is? Why would he even mention that? Anyone in his audience would know that already or be able to see it on him, so it's also self-evident. It's a detail he'd have to have a plausible reason for saying.

>vine green//

As you've used it, hyphenate this.

>either instantly causing the demons to either//

Not only repetitive, but redundant.

Now you're throwing around a lot of terminology like Hobgoblins, Glide... I have no idea what any of this is, yet the narrative tone is treating it as if I should. It's tricky to provide context when it's something the narrator might not have a reason to explain, but context is very important for crossovers. You have to assume your readers have never seen the crossover material before and make the story so that they can still understand it. I'm getting lost. I don't even know what it's a crossover with, as your synopsis doesn't say.

>as the warped closer and closer//

Typo.

>An explosive shot eviscerates the closest Goblin//

Why are you switching to present tense here? You end up wavering back and forth quite a bit.

>well placed//

That'd be hyphenated, but note that you use the phrase twice close together.

>My curiosity mingled with my grief//

He's directly identifying his emotions a lot. That's not a particularly engaging way to write, since that's not how you interpret real people's emotions. Let me see the evidence of his grief so that I'll make that conclusion on my own.

>night black//

Hyphenate.

>a two hundred yards//

Extraneous word.

>50//

Write out numbers that short.

>the Goblins prostate//

Unless you're making a very uncomfortable anatomical reference, you want "prostrate."

>My emotions became a great froth of confusion, horror and disgust//

Yeah, quit just outright telling me how he feels.

>power ,//

Extraneous space.

>My cerulean eye//

Why would he comment on his own eye color? Do you ever do that? It's not even remotely relevant to what's going on, and there's no reason he'd even think about it, much less decide it's a detail that needs to be part of the record.

>destroyed...it//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it's at the beginning of the sentence or immediately followed by other punctuation.

>a device possible of instantaneous transportation//

Seems like you meant "capable" there.

>astonishing amount of nearby organic life unlike any seen since well before the Collapse. I would investigate this astonishing//

More close repetition.

>`"You're hurt."//

Some kind of extraneous punctuation there.

>swaths of golden light. In my immobile condition I could see only see the swaths grass//

More close repetition, and the second one is missing a word anyway.

>serendipitous affection//

That seems a really strange word choice. Maybe it's a bit serendipitous that Fluttershy is so kind and happens to find him, but the way you've phrased it, it was equally coincidental that the previous Guardian had been kind, and I don't get that sense at all.

>response to my pained attempt to respond//

Repetition. Note that I'm only providing some examples of repetition. There are a lot more.

>peaks over the horizon//

I don't know why writers in this fandom have so much trouble discerning "peak" from "peek."

>the zenith of the horizon//

This is a nonsensical phrasing. A zenith is a point directly overhead, while the horizon is distant.

>"I've never seen anything like you before, poor thing."//

He's robotic, right? I'm surprised she immediately recognizes him as something living and not some sort of device.

>she addressed to them,

Don't break a sentence across paragraphs like this.

>100//

Write it out.

>T-thank//

Consider what sound she's actually repeat. That word doesn't have a "t" sound in it.

>I found you laying in the grass//

Lay/lie confusion.

>its not in Equestria//

Its/it's confusion.

>a world you want too see//

>somepony that we could get you back too//
To/too confusion.

Now that we're further into the story and it's apparent the narrator is recording this as a log, I'll point out a little more about how the framing feels off. This is essentially the same thing as a journal-based story, and one of the major problems with those is that they're recorded long after the events actually occurred, so that it's unreasonable for the writer to recall dialogue so precisely that he can present it as entire quoted conversations. But this narrator is mechanical and can record it to that degree of accuracy. However, then his purpose is a little different. If he wants to record it so it's available for someone to play back in the future, then it's still a little odd for him to put the emotional context in there, too, since it's not the same thing as making a factual record. He's not just mechanical, though, so it's not that he doesn't have emotions.

Basically, the story is written more like he's relating it to someone years later and recalling what happened to him, not like he's recording it in the moment as a way of documenting it for historical or informative purposes.

>waked//

I can't imagine that's the word you intended. I don't see how it makes sense here.

>moving in a linear motion//

So it moved in a motion? Seems like a tautology.

>this creature, and most likely the rest of her kind, possess//

Number disagreement: this creature... possess.

>y'all//

What? Why is he just now lapsing into this informal word choice? It feels inconsistent with his character.

>negatively effecting the poor, innocent creature quivering//

Affecting. As you've worded it, his response causes Fluttershy to exist.

>didn't-doesn't//

Use a proper dash.

>war mongerers//

warmongers

>rust red//

>blood coated//
Hyphenate.

>I turn to my Guardian.//

I would italicize this brief flashback, or it's initially confusing as to whether he's talking to Fluttershy.

>She looks directly into my sad blue eye and says,//

>I looked directly into her ice blue eyes, and said,//
Again, don't break sentences across paragraphs. I'll have to stop marking these.

>Wait-my//

Use a dash.

>Slow down Blue//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I shook myself, "Sorry, Fluttershy.//

You've punctuated that like it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.

>While all these emotions danced within myself//

Reflexive pronouns are really only appropriate when the person or thing they refer to is also the clause's subject, and that's not the case here.

>but so was her//

but so was she

>the scope of her affect on the City//

Effect. Using "affect" as a noun means something like a personal quirk.

>war mongering//

That's one word.

>was the source of our rise and our fall. "//

Extraneous space, and when one paragraph ends with a word of dialogue, and the next one begins with a word of dialogue by the same speaker, it's customary to leave the closing quotation marks off the earlier paragraph.

>preventing the death of however many millions of us remain//

deaths

>low quality//

>two minute//
Hyphenate.

>for you and I//

People make this mistake all the time because they're so afraid of misusing "me." Consider this:

"You and I" is equivalent to "we." (They're both nominative case.)
"You and me" is equivalent to "us." (They're both objective case.)
Just make the substitution. What sounds correct, "for we" or "for us"?

>She shook her head in both denial and confusion, "I still don't understand//

You're using a non-speaking action as a speech tag again.

>She visibly began to quiver slightly//

If it were invisible, he wouldn't have seen it to be able to say so, which makes it self-explanatory.

>Fluttershy began to noticeably break down further//

Same deal. If it weren't noticeable, he couldn't have described it, since he wouldn't have even known about it, so it's pointless to say so.

>Composing herself as much as she could, garnering the fragile situation//

Two problems here. First, these are things only she could know, but you're saying them from the Ghost's perspective. And "garner" is a poor word choice here. It typically means something like earn or warrant. That doesn't make sense in this context.

>Crystal tears formed in the pupils of Fluttershy's ice blue eyes//

That's not where tears come from...

>meet-I//

Use dashes for asides and cutoffs.

>buttery hooves//

The use of any reference to butter when describing Fluttershy has become horribly cliched.

>Her expression resolved into one of internal strengths mingled with both honest determination and downright fear.//

Jeez, that's a lot of spoon-feeding of emotion. She's your actress, and you're the stage director. What do you tell her to do on stage to convey these emotions to the audience? That's how you have to think about it. Have her do those things. Then you'll never have to name a single emotion, but the reader will still interpret them exactly how you want.

>Her ice blue eyes//

How many times are you going to call them that? You just did a couple of paragraphs ago, and you did several times in previous chapters. It's getting very repetitive. If you mean it to be a thematic repetition, there are ways of doing that smoothly. Vary the description a bit here and there while still hovering around elements of ice. I wouldn't get too creative with using a dozen different words for blue, though, as that also gets very cliched and potentially confusing. Maybe work in the color by metaphor more than naming it directly in a few places.

I guess I'm a little surprised Fluttershy doesn't just see this as an extension of her position as an element, since they're both linked to kindness. And maybe wonder why the other elements aren't seeing something similar.

>Are you sure about all of this, Blue?//

Look how often you use direct address during their conversations. Then think about how often you actually do in a real conversation, particularly when it's one on one. Direct address is used for emphasis or to get someone's attention, and that doesn't really apply in the vast majority of your uses. Or it can be used to clarify the intended recipient, but that's only necessary when there are more than two characters present.

>its the word of a Ghost//

It's/its confusion.

>and a Ghost never tells a lie//

This does nothing to change the fact that he's still asking her to take his word for it.

>kilometer//

You'd used English units not long ago. I can't remember which chapter, so I can't go back and find it, but I'm pretty sure you used inches or feet. Be consistent.

>bedtimes stories//

Noun adjuncts are singular. For instance, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

>trigonometric//

I can't fathom what you intend this to mean. Is it some jargon that has another meaning beyond the typical one in the source material for your crossover?

>even us Ghosts don't know//

You're using that in the nominative case, so it would be "we Ghosts."

>to protect her who I chose to be the Guardian of the world//

But he didn't choose her. He just found her and determined that she'd inherited the position. So there's no way that's the standard reply.

>and it's functions//

You keep using the wrong form of it's or its. Keep in mind that "it's" is a contraction for "it is" or "it has." "Its" is a possessive pronoun. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes, like my, mine, your, yours, his, her, hers, its, our, ours, their, theirs, and whose.

>lime pony//

But she's not anywhere near a lime color. Plus Blue knows her name now, so why keep making such a formal and impersonal reference to her?

>little more than whim//

Missing word.

>I stared in mock terror at my motion sensor.//

I don't understand the use of "mock" at all. He goes on to say he's detected a Vex, so why wouldn't this be actual terror?

>pursuing//

Another really strange word choice. The tentacles trail around behind the main body, trying to catch it?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2766

>>2765
I'm not sure what this intro to chapter 6 is supposed to be. A dream? In any case, it doesn't seem like the kind of thing he'd record in a log. In fact, it doesn't even seem to be part of the log, and if you were going to break from that format, waiting until chapter 6 isn't the thing to do. It just makes it feel out of place.

>organic organisms//

Isn't that redundant?

>He heart skipped a beat//

Typo.

This long preamble to getting back to the battle is weird. I mean, I see the point from a story perspective in leaving a cliffhanger between seeing the Vex and its attack. But from Blue's perspective, why break journal entries there? What reasonable person would actually do that? Then you go from the first entry being very in the moment, as if it's being recorded right when the attack occurred, to the second entry waxing philosophical before getting back to the action. It's two vastly different styles that don't mesh well, since they're supposed to be happening right together. It also disarms the sense that this attack was sudden, if Blue has the chance to muse on all this right in the middle of things. It creates a disconnect in the immediacy of these consecutive entries.

>fool-hearty//

foolhardy

>Transmuting my old Guardian's Thorn into physical existence in front of Fluttershy's stoic face.//

That's a sentence fragment, and a participial phrase isn't a good way to do one, not to mention it's not a good place for one.

>BANG//

It's preferred not to use sound effects in narration like this. Just describe the sound.

I don't know why you keep italicizing Thorn. That's reserved for things like title of major works and names of ships. Weapons, like Mjolnir or Excalibur, don't use italics.

With all this mention of the weapon being toxic and radioactive, how safe is it? Wouldn't it cause residual effects on Equestria and on Fluttershy herself?

>"I just killed something."//

Y'know, I'd have expected her to struggle with this before doing so as well. It didn't take much to convince her to use the weapon, and she had to know it wasn't going to be something gentle. This is definitely a realistic after-the-fact reaction from her, but it seems like she would have had one earlier on as well.

>Still she stood still, silent for a few moments, pondering quietly, adrenaline sill pumping.//

Three uses of "still" in the same sentence.

>A single tear//

That is about the most cliched thing you could have written.

Chapter 7 is another weird departure. When you've established a consistent delivery for 6 chapters, then it's jarring to have that change this far into the story. I'd encourage you to do something like this within the first few chapters and set the precedent for it early.

>"Ghost, you make anything of this?" The Guardian asked//

Don't capitalize a speech tag following dialogue.

>An steel, oval table adorned took up most of the space//

Jumbled wording. It sounds like you changed what you wanted to say and forgot to edit out the old stuff.

Around here, the narration is expressing lots of opinions, so it's a limited narrator, but I have no idea who holds the perspective. That hasn't been established for the scene.

>who. "//

Extraneous space.

>Caydes question//

Missing apostrophe.

>that vaguely represented horses//

Strange word choice. I assume you meant "resembled."

>Ikora raised here hand//

Typo.

>ordinance//

ordnance

>a great gains//

Mixing singular/plural there.

>Ikora continued Cayde's sentiment//

This is completely redundant with what she says. Let the dialogue speak for itself.

>loosing whatever was left of my mind//

While it's possible this has a valid meaning, it's an unusual use of the word. I have to think you meant "losing."

>Her eyes were clearly bloodshot, her complexion, pale, her expression, void by terror.//

There's an implied verb in each of those list items, so you don't need the commas after "complexion" or "expression."

Since chapter 8 picks right up after chapter 6, it throws a wrench in the works as to when chapter 7 happens. Did Blue really transmit his logs while Fluttershy was hugging him? It's implied by how the chapters are ordered, yet it's never mentioned he did, and it'd be a weird time for him to, since he's otherwise preoccupied.

>'heroes are remembered, but legends never die'".//

Capitalize the first word, and the period goes inside the quotes.

>song birds//

songbirds

>find couple of friends//

Missing word.

>She trailed off//

I already know that from the ellipsis at the end of her dialogue. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>we should've gotten their already//

There/their confusion.

>as the panic in my voice became obvious//

Obvious to whom? He's already feeling panicked, so it's irrelevant that it's in his voice, and he's got bigger things on his mind that listening to his tone.

>lightening//

lightning

>plasteel//

There's no reason to italicize that.

>Screams that curdled blood//

What does that even mean to him? He doesn't have blood.

>as my Guardian stood frozen as the crimson daggers tore her armor to pieces//

It's very clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in a sentence, much less stacked up in a row.

>lived to tell the tail//

More homophone confusion.

>Extending her hoof forwards lightning fast, an orange orb of dense fire-energy//

This says the energy extended her hoof.

>found themselves on fire themselves//

Redundant.

Fluttershy still has an awfully quick change in her attitude toward killing Vex. She's always the first one to claim that dangerous animals, like the manticore, are simply misunderstood. I don't know how and why she's already decided that the Vex are any different. Reacting to an immediate threat is one thing, but signing on for the long haul? I want to see that process, or it's just the reader having to take your word for it that Fluttershy has changed in a very fundamental way.

>an three//

Typo.

>Ironic, my old Guardian belonged to this class and subclass as well.//

How is this ironic?

>I can teach you how to bear the fire//

You're correct that you don't need the closing quotes on the previous paragraph, but you do need opening quotes on this one.

>Minotaur spotted behind the formation//

How would they differentiate this from the minotaurs indigenous to Equestria?

>center most//

centermost

If the good guys can so easily scan the Vex and see where they are, what's keeping the Vex from doing the same?

>the Titan observed the alternating patterns that the metallic creatures employed, quickly deciding upon an action plan//

The "deciding upon an action plan" is located so much closer to the "metallic creatures" that it seems to describe them.

>Guardian's presence//

There's more than one Guardian there, right?

>positioned on an elevated position//

So they're positioned on a position?

>Guardian's armor//

Again, there's more than one, right?

>the gap between themselves//

There's no reason to use a reflexive pronoun there. "Them" will do fine.

>the bottleneck the squad leader had intended for//

That "for" is completely extraneous.

This battle is going very well. As much as you build up the Vex to be fearsome enemies, only the death of the Guardian in chapter 1 ever paints them as such. Since then, they haven't presented much of a challenge.

>winded//

wound

>they grew close the mysterious Vex machine//

Missing word.

>killin//

Missing apostrophe.

>Ya'll//

Y'all. I don't know why so many people can't spell this.

>bout'//

Why would the apostrophe go at the end? The missing letter is at the beginning.

Again, I have no idea what you're crossing with. A quick Google search for some of the jargon would tell me, but that's not the point. Really, it doesn't matter, since it should be accessible to everyone, and for the most part, you're fine, but everyone's motivations are pretty murky until I got well into the story, and a lot of terminology is thrown around as if I should already know it. The weaponry, all the types of units on either side... all of it means nothing to me, and little of it is described.

Aside from that, I'll say that it was an engaging story, and you do have writing talent. Since I don't know the source material, I can't tell whether Blue is entirely of your own invention or if you've just copied his personality from it. But he's a well-defined and interesting character. Fluttershy is mostly in character, but I already discussed how her transition to being a willing Guardian was rushed and mostly off camera.

A lot gets bogged down in the details of the writing, though. All those things where I said I would have to stop marking them? Direct address, repetition, etc. All that needs attention, and there's a lot more than what I pointed out. And the other bigger issue is the delivery. I also discussed how it feels inconsistent about who Blue's audience is and how he's addressing them, plus how chapter 7 fits into the timeline. It takes attention to detail to fix those things, but if you can get them under control, then I could see posting the story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2769

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>bit...” her grin receded to a simple smile, “Really//

You have that narrative bit starting in lower case as if it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb. Then when you transition back into the quote, you use a comma, yet you have th dialogue capitalized.

>Twily!” said Shining Armor, nuzzling her, “Your//

And again. You're saying the two parts of the quote are a single sentence with that punctuation and capitalization in the narration, but the punctuation and capitalization of the dialogue say the exact opposite. This is a pervasive problem. There's a quick guide to punctuation and capitalization of dialogue at the top of this thread.

>student” said//

Missing comma.

You use direct address a lot, far more than would be necessary for the characters or readers to know who is speaking to whom. Think about how often you actually do this in a real conversation. Using it too often makes dialogue sound less realistic.

>me” Twilight//

Missing punctuation.

>Starswirl's Magical Matrix Theories//

>Amniomorphic Formulae vol. XII//
Book titles would be underlined or, preferably, italicized.

>the purple unicorn//

It's worth reading the section on Lavender Unicorn Syndrome at the top of this thread, but more than that, it doesn't work with the perspective. Twilight holds the point of view here. Essentially, the narrator's been taking on her internal voice. That means that she's choosing to describe herself as "the purple unicorn." Who thinks about themselves in such abstract and external terms?

>"You're so cool, Rainbow Dash!"//

In the first scene, you had fancy-style quotation marks, probably from MS Word or GDocs or something else that uses smart quotes. I found it a little odd that you had fancy quotes but simple apostrophes, but as long as you're consistent, it doesn't matter. Yet in this scene, even the quotation marks are simple. you need to pick a scheme and use it throughout.

>SO COOOL!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>the pegasus captain//

Another oddly external reference for the perspective.

Hm. So you're going to do one of these episodes for all of the elements? That's probably not a good idea, for several reasons. One, it's cliched, so it takes real necessity to overcome that. Two, it's predictable, so after reading just two of these, I know how the other four are going to go. I could just skip them and lose nothing. And three, these characters all have a similar experience, so focusing on one or two of them is enough to get the story's point across. You can still have them all going through it, but imply it rather than show it explicitly. Maybe later on, the rest of the girls mention having similarly odd experiences. Something like that. But saying the same thing six times doesn't accomplish anything.

>the party planner extraordinaire//

I'm going to stop marking these. Suffice it to say there are only specific types of this kind of reference that work with a limited narrator.

>thou has//

hast

>Pinkie.” Came Maud’s roaringly ecstatic approval//

That sounds like a speech tag, but the punctuation and capitalization is wrong.

>Credit where it’s due, Sis//

You've correctly capitalized a family relation when it's used as a term of address, but you didn't earlier when Twilight called Shining "bro."

>‘til/

One thing about smart quotes is they always put a backward apostrophe on the beginning of a word, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way, or you can type two in a row and delete the first.

>visiting stalls and securing various foods at ludicrous speed//

This is incredibly vague. I don't know what she's doing or why.

>I told ya mom//

Capitalize the family relation, and it needs a comma for direct address.

>‘ol//

Why is the apostrophe on the front? The missing letter is at the end.

>Fancypants//

Fancy Pants

>Bravo Rarity//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>as a spotlight illuminated the Mistress of Ceremonies, Photo Finish, as she prepared to personally give Rarity her award//

It's very clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence, plus it can muddle the sentence's chronology.

>crafted-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs and asides.

>it.” she finished up with a wink.//

Punctuation.

>impossible!.//

Extraneous punctuation.

>Fluttershy trailed off.//

I can already see that from they way her dialogue ends in an ellipsis. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>“It’s truly my pleasure, Mayor.//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

>mind did a mental//

Isn't that self-explanatory?

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

Now that I'm moving on to chapter 2, I won't keep marking these same things. Assume you need to scan the whole story for them.

>powerfully-built//

An exception to multi-word modifiers is that you dn't need a hyphen for two-word phrases starting in an -ly adverb. It's already unambiguous as to what modifies what.

>lil’//

li’l

>her grandson’s//

A strange way for Applejack to refer to him, since she is the perspective character. People think of others they know through names, pronouns, or some kind of descriptor like this that defines the person's relationship to themselves. If she didn't know Big Mac, this kind of thing might make sense.

>Granny Smith and Macintosh turned around upon hearing his family’s returning hoofsteps.//

I assume the "his" refers to Big Mac, but it's awkwardly phrased. Why mention both him and Granny Smith, but then only attribute the family to him?

>fully-loaded//

You don't need that hyphen.

>I had never actually been out to the country before//

Then why does she have that accent? Did she pick it up over the years? I guess having a southern accent doesn't exclude being a city dweller, but canon has never established a southern city, just small towns and rural areas.

>mare- clearly from the city -walks//

Use proper dashes and the spacing appropriate for the kind you choose.

See, in chapter 2, you're focusing in Applejack. It's fine to tie in later that the other girls had similar experiences, but showing them all up front detracts from the story, besides being repetitive and predictable. You've obviously already seen the strength in keeping this Applejack's story, so you must also see why having the other 5 is extraneous, and the beginning of a story is a really poor place to have extraneous information.

>Alright, Sugarcube//

You hadn't been capitalizing "sugarcube" before. It shouldn't be.

>ah’d//

When you're using "Ah" in place of "I," it has to be capitalized just the same.

>But AJ’s efforts gradually lessened them, tossing them into a sack to be used as compost later.//

This says her efforts tossed the weeds into a sack, not that she did.

>I hear the Ponyville Fair is going on for the next few days.//

Doesn't sound like the kind of thing they would have only just heard about. They go into town a lot and are involved in community events. Why wouldn't they be certain of this? Especially since a fair is typically where a farm would showcase its products...

>...Mom//

I don't get why she's trailing in. She's not picking up a previously suspended sentence. She's not just getting into earshot, she's not just becoming conscious, etc.

>It’s easy to tell if something’s hurting you//

Missing quotation marks.

>hand yer mother an’ I//

"Me" is actually appropriate here. You wouldn't say "hand I a sickle."

>AJ looked unusually solemn//

That's a very external observation for her to make about herself.

>died!//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>raised!” Exclaimed/

Capitalization.

>A single tear escaped AJ’s eye./

That's about the most cliched thing you could have written.

>the word around them//

Typo.

>Wha-,//

Use a proper dash, and don't ever use a comma in conjunction with one.

>resulting in her only being forced backwards several feet while maintaining her footing//

This is a pretty clinical description, versus how Applejack herself might describe it. Keep in mind the narration is her thought processes for the kind of narrator you've established.

>15//

Write out numbers that short.

Likewise with the other 5 girls, I don't think switching to Alura's perspective in the middle of chapter 3 is a good idea. The story's not about her, and she's not undergoing any crisis, redemption, or emotional struggle, so she's not a compelling character. She's also not going to be observant about Applejack's inner conflict, because she doesn't care about it. So it really does nothing for the story's message to use her viewpoint.

>the plant creature’s//

Another odd reference.

>She didn’t have much time to ponder as her joints buckled, eyes wrenching shut as she fell to the floor thrashing.//

Another spot where you have two "as" clauses in the same sentence. Then you have a third one in the next sentence. Don't lean so much on a construction that's relatively uncommon in everyday speech. It stands out very easily when overused.

>whereas before she had felt desperate, Applejack now felt empowered//

Now you're switching back to Applejack's perspective in the middle of the scene. It wasn't a smooth transition, and I think it highlights why it wasn't necessary to leave her perspective in the first place. Another problem, though, and one that's popped up intermittently in the story. You directly name emotions and moods a fair amount, whereas it's more engaging to demonstrate them so that the reader will figure them out on his own. Saying she's empowered is a cold fact. Making her act and sound empowered created a much more vivid image.

>The farmpony//

Another odd reference. And you call her that six times in this scene.

Look at how you arrange your paragraphs in the epilogue. It's pretty characteristic of how you did through much of the story. Whenever you have dialogue, so many of the paragraphs have a bit of speech, then a speech tag with an action attached to it, then back to the speech. They're all structured the same. That's another form of repetition that can make a story less interesting to read.

>Luna mainly keeps an eye out for nightmares//

But wouldn't Luna notice when the same ponies were dreaming for far too long? And just about anyone would notice when they hadn't seen any Ponyville residents in a while. This bad guy hasn't thought through her plan too well.

And when Applejack says her friends should have been in her dream... why weren't they? If that's what would have made her happy, then wouldn't the magic make that happen?

This is a very show-tone villain, one that comes and goes with a seemingly serious threat but ultimately doing no harm. She has less motivation that any of the show villains, though. She's basically the same as Chrysalis, needing to feed, but I don't know why on this scale. Chrysalis had an entire hive to feed, but Alura is alone. Why does she need to capture a whole town? It'd be far easier to hide the disappearance of one or two ponies, so she had no hopes of staying undetected, unless she took over the whole nation, but she had no designs on that, so I'm left stumped as to why this exact scope was appropriate and workable for her. I think it would help if she had a viable plan in place.

And as I mentioned before, I think it's detracting from the story to go through each of the girls in chapter 1. It's also detrimental to use Alura and Twilight as perspective characters late in the story. Once Twilight wkes up is the time to tie in that all the girls had been affected, and it's enough for them to say something to that effect. We don't need to see what their dreams are. It's easy enough to figure out what they might be, and the specifics aren't important. The real journey is Applejack's, and I'm glad to see you tied that into the epilogue again, because it felt like you'd dropped it before.

Again, remember that Applejack holds the perspective and that the story's really about her. Don't lose sight of that. During the fight scene, a lot of the action takes on a more omniscient feel; it describes an outsider's view on the fight, not so much Applejack's experience of it. And keep up the story's theme. Her anger at having her parents' memory used against her should be driving a lot of her emotion in the battle, and then it keeps that tie going to the epilogue instead of letting it drop away and then finding it again. You might want to dwell on the ending a bit more, too. It rushes to make the story's point, and Applejack dismisses the opportunity to see her parents rather quickly. It almost sounds like the story's saying she doesn't need them because she's happy with her friends, but it seems more like she was angling for a message of coming to terms with their loss and honoring what they meant to her, then finding happiness despite that, not finding happiness as a means of replacing it. So don't rush that ending. It's where everything comes together and you express what the purpose of having the reader there is.

Then there are the detailed fixes of stylistic and mechanical things, and I spelled all those out for you. Just note that I only picked out examples to help you find the rest on your own. What I listed is by no means exhaustive. There's a nice story in here, though, and if you can tune it up, I could see posting it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2771

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>as she glared at the apple in front of her//

This is pretty extraneous, as you've already said it was an apple and that it was in front of her.

>disappear…er//

Leave a space after an ellipsis unless it starts a sentence or has punctuation right after it.

>teleporting the apple to where she wanted to go//

To where she wanted it to go, right? She's not going along for the ride.

>Almost there Trixie//

Needs a comma for direct address. You regularly leave these off.

>to appear in the air right above Starlight and gently knocking//

Those verb forms are mismatched.

>the mare//

You're using a limited narrator in Trixie's perspective, so you'e essentially saying that she'd refer to Starlight like this in her own thoughts. That's awfully external and formal for someone she knows well.

>her eyebrows furrowed in annoyance//

You mostly stay in a gray area of this, but it's better to demonstrate emotion instead of outright telling the reader what it is. How would you know someone you saw in public was annoyed? Think about the details you'd notice from their appearance and behavior. That's the kind of context to provide, since it mirrors how we perceive real people. It comes across as more authentic.

>a teasingly way//

You've got an adverb where you need an adjective.

>hoping the slight shakiness to her apologetic smile wouldn’t give away that yes, she had in fact been thinking of such things//

There are more subtle ways of saying such things. You don't want to over-explain.

>how was she supposed to concentrate on moving the apple across the table when that drip-dripping of water needed to stop.//

Isn't that a question?

>announcement, ”Shall//

When you transition into speech with a comma like that, don't capitalize the speech.

>Sugar Cube//

Canon has that as one word, and the "corner" after it is part of the name; it should also be capitalized.

>I was think//

Typo.

>once again Starlight rolls her eyes and smiles as she sees through it//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>crumb filled//

When a whole multi-word phrase is a single descriptor, hyphenate it.

>the only one’s left//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>addressing the motherly mare standing behind the counter//

Another strangely external descriptor for someone she knows, plus this is all redundant. She used Mrs. Cake's name, so we already know whom she's talking to, and the reader will presumably know what she looks like.

>signifying she was ready for their order//

You're over-explaining things again.

>Pumpkin and Pound were just being extra fussy tonight about bath time so I took over so she could help Mr. Cake settle them down.//

You need a comma between your clauses.

>a sarcastic “Fascinating”//

You're not really present that as a quote (the "a" makes it generic), so you don't need to capitalize it. And the comma goes inside the quotes.

>Starlight said, taking her own quick glance at the counter, “We//

Capitalization on transitioning back into the quote again, and you're using this sentence structure a whole lot. Look how often you have these participial phrases (usually an action beginning with an -ing verb), especially tacked onto the end of some narration, especially with speaking actions.

>yes, Any//

Why is that capitalized?

>she grinned//

You have that as a speech tag, but it has no speaking action. How do you grin a sentence?

>ones she paid attention to were the one’s//

Same issue with possessive/plural confusion, but I don't know why you got it right once and wrong once in the same sentence.

>alright - Trixie admitted she made a mean pastry so it was best to stay on her good side- but//

Use proper dashes. You had one earlier, so you know how.

>“One slice of chocolate cake and one slice of strawberry shortcake coming right up,” she said, ringing up the cash register, “You two feel free to take seat.//

Here's a different issue. By going out of the quote and back in with commas, you're saying that both parts of the quote come together to make a single sentence, but if you put it together that way, it'd be a comma splice. Then you have a typo at the end.

>in town center//

You'd normally phrase that with a "the" in there.

>what few night spots there were in this little town//

Watch the close word repetition. You use "town" four times in this paragraph.

>...you//

Unless you're picking up from an earlier sentence that trailed off, capitalize a sentence that starts with an ellipsis.

>Wanting to keep it and keep seeing that smile//

That's awkwardly phrased.

>a small, yellow unicorn foal with a carrot-colored mane appeared levitating and dripping with water right in front of Mrs. Cake, startling her and spilling coffee all over the table.//

You don't need that first comma, since those two words describe different things about Pumpkin, and the way you worded this, Pumpkin is who spilled the coffee.

Why would Trixie teleport the napkins instead of just levitating them over? It's not like teleportation would be any faster, and she knows it could be problematic.

>baited breath//

bated

>and….well//

One too many dots there.

>Still in the dispensary, but still//

Another example of close word repetition.

>dispensary//

dispenser

>your first truly successful transportation spell//

Teleportation. She's levitated stuff before, which is transportation.

>After we’ve practiced this enough to make sure you got down teleporting inanimate objects//

Needs a comma after this to set off the dependent clause.

>Didn’t want to spoil the celebration my messing up a teleportation.//

Typo.

>she glances outside//

Gone to present tense again.

>Celestia’s Academy for Gifted Unicorns//

Per canon, it's a school, not an academy.

>What’s rude about me that//

Missing word.

>And, well, it was kind of true what she was saying.//

That "well" phrasing is repetitive with the previous sentence.

>Starlight’s panicked eyes//

And you already described her as panicked earlier in the same paragraph.

>Honestly, still surprised myself//

Missing word.

>smiling to let Starlight know she wasn’t having any hard feelings about this//

You really need to stop spelling out everyone's motivations for what they're doing.

>Though had to create that spell//

Missing word.

>Her little tale of her educational woes//

You also have this tendency to repeat information the reader already knows. If you just left it as "her tale," what would it lose?

>Trixie, of course, simply waved it off, “Go//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>anyway so they deserved being burnt down anyway//

Repetitive.

>still giggling Starlight//

still-giggling Starlight

>I even helped saved Equestria//

Typo.

You're right—there isn't that much to this story, but there is a bit of development to the relationship between the two. It'd help a lot if you made more of a conflict about it. There's nothing anyone struggles with here, be it Trixie still trying to avoid making Starlight angry, working through some shame at admitting her past mistakes (kind of convenient for Starlight to ask about school, then, instead of Trixie bringing it up), or whatever. There really needs to be something at stake so that there's some tension in the story. There's never any question how it'll turn out, because there are no obstacles to resolving a conflict or someone experiencing character growth. You've got a setup that'll support it, so just add that.

Aside from that, there are obviously some editing and stylistic issues here, and I just marked some examples. It's not an exhaustive list.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2772

Dear Pre-reader 63.546,

So, took most of the stylistic advice given in that review, and decided to rework the ending scene a bit to draw out more of a conflict. Pulling out a bit more "defensive ego" Trixie to add a bit more conflict to Starlight's comments about Trixie's education to get them more annoyed at each other before getting into fuzzy friendship speeches. At the end of the day it is still a fluff fic, which I would argue is defined by minimal conflict, but I do like a chance to write out egotistical Trixie more so why not.

Will update and resubmit to EQD once worked through

Oh, and most of my stylistic stuff with quotations is due to my misunderstanding some rules about quotations when you want to have more than one sentence interrupted with a description of action or whatever. Fixed most of those I believe.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2773

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Is- is//

Use proper dashes for cutoffs and asides.

>Her horn connected with his and the spell began to glow between them.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>CRACK!//

Having sound effects in narration like this tends to work for very specific kinds of stories. For a more dramatic one, it's best just to describe the sound.

>would be//

Hyphenate multi-word descriptors used as single modifiers.

>devour!//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, then include an exclamation mark or question mark attached to it in the italics.

>Chrysalis' mouth opened wide and a wispy pink mist began to flow from Celestia's heart.//

Needs a comma.

>never learned it's lesson//

Its/it's confusion. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes.

>What're you-//

Use a dash.

>now blackened//

Hyphenate.

>I- I//

That can be a dash or a hyphen, depending on how you want it to sound, but for a hyphen, don't leave a space after it. For a dash, the spacing depends on what kind. There's a guide to dashes at the top of this thread.

I could see Twilight attacking Chrysalis in a fit of rage, but that's awful quick for her to have a complete about-face in her attitude toward friendship and harmony.

>terrifying!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>What are you going to do Twilight Sparkle?//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>compassion?//

Italicize the question mark.

>wanted-"//

Use a dash.

>I'm sorry, princess.//

Princess would be capitalized when used as a term of address.

>half burnt//

Hyphenate.

>Stenson//

Stetson

>Celestia...she- she//

Use a dash, and leave a space after an ellipsis.

>Gently breaking Shining's embrace, Twilight trotted over to the window, looking up at the midday sun.//

Participial phrases imply that things happen at the same time, so you have her doing all three of these actions simultaneously, yet they'd more logically happen in sequence.

>sugar cube//

Needs a comma for direct address.

You're using a lot of unusual speaking verbs, to the point they're drawing attention to themselves. There's a section on saidisms at the top of this thread.

>Chrysalis..." Twilight trailed off//

The ellipsis already means she trailed off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>Pinkie jumped on the map and confetti somehow burst out of her mane//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>The maps noises//

Missing apostrophe.

>here-"//

Use a dash.

>"Uh, what do you mean the writers-"//

This is really not the kind of story that's going to support meta humor.

>Rainbow cut her off//

Similar to trailing off, you don't need to narrate a cutoff when the punctuation already indicates it.

>and, it's our duty to help anypony who's having a friendship problem//

The comma should go before the conjunction, not after it.

Now that I'm through two chapters, I'm going to mark fewer things. I wasn't being comprehensive anyway, but I'll assume I pointed out enough examples that you can find those things from here on. Plus I'll be at this forever if I keep it up.

>complimented by expensive looking chairs and furniture//

Chairs are furniture. And unless the furniture has nice things to say, you want "complemented."

>I hate portals..." Rainbow groaned//

When's she ever been through one?

>We're very much in the Crystal Empire, but not our version of it. A parallel universe.//

Why wouldn't this already be obvious to Twilight? Or everyone else? The mirror's never done anything else but send them to parallel universes.

>Woah//

Why can so few authors spell that right?

>sis//

Family relations get capitalized when used as a term of address.

>This Shining Armor was identical to the one Twilight new//

Typo.

You really use a lot of ellipses. It tends to make the writing choppy. They're really better when used here and there for flavor, but too many becomes a writing tic, and you want the reader remembering what happened in the story, not that he saw a bunch of ellipses.

>Twilight turned around to see that the guard was standing at attention//

I've noticed little things like this popping up in the story, and it's worth combing through it all to make sure your narration is consistent. You're using Twilight as your limited narrator. You have the narration take a conversational tone and express Twilight's thoughts and opinions as his own. That means your narrator must also be confined to what Twilight could know or perceive. So how can she identify him as a guard before she's seen him?

>Twilight had been there during session only once and knew that the citizens of the empire would come to Princess Cadence and her brother with their grievances and concerns.//

This sentence is fighting itself. The "been there only once" tends to make it sound like her information might be unreliable, yet she "knew" the second part. A "but" would make it sound like she understood the seeming contradiction, but you have "and," indicating that the two parts are linked, or that one implies the other. It doesn't quite make sense.

>it said it's name//

Its/it's confusion.

>She remembered Thorax from recent events in her own world.//

Her reaction already implies this. And you don't need to spend a paragraph rehashing an episode the reader's presumably seen, or else there's a whole lot more about your story he won't get, either, like what "klutzy draconequus" is supposed to mean.

>Rainbow said the word with distaste//

>Applejack was reticent//
You still have spots like this where your're giving me the emotions as cold facts. This doesn't create a mental image. How is Rainbow acting that Twilight would interpret it as distaste? What about Applejack makes her seem reticent?

>Z-zecora//

A name has to be capitalized, so capitalize it in every part of a stutter.

>Silence hung in the air as the ponies made sense of Zecora's odd wisdom.//

Watch the perspective again. How would Twilight know that's what the other girls are doing. The narration can only say what Twilight knows, sees, hears, thinks, etc.

>sneaky/easy//

That's really stretching for a rhyme.

>cept'//

Why is the apostrophe on the end? The missing letters are at the beginning.

>pegasi guards//

Noun adjuncts are singular, even when they go with a plural. You say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

>we just do we just do//

Repeated phrase.

Twilight might not like what Cadence did to Thorax, but she's still been affectionate to Twilight. I'm surprised Twilight's willing to send her to Tartarus instead of just incapacitating her or escaping.

>It's going to hurt us... inside.//

That's awfully melodramatic.

>a small tear forming in her eye//

And the single tear is about the most cliched thing you could have written.

>Twilight slowly began//

This is the second "began" action in the paragraph. That's a verb that should be used sparingly at best, as is "started." It's obvious that any given action begins, so it's only worth pointing out when that beginning is notable, like if it's abrupt or the action never finishes. Then you have another "began" in the next paragraph.

>she was physically millions of light years from her actual home//

Huh? I though this was supposed to be a parallel universe? So there are all these copies of the same characters all within one universe? That's strange.

>waiting/making//

Really stretching for that rhyme again.

>Everfree forest//

"Forest" is part of the proper name and should also be capitalized.

>Zecora and Twilight sat down as well, stifling a small chuckle.//

This sounds like they both stifled a chuckle.

>more/control//

C'mon.

>Not just out of sadness, but out of guilt and shame too.//

Very blunt and clinical with those emotions.

>Sometimes her magic even frightened herself//

Use a reflexive pronoun when it refers to the same person or thing as the clause's subject. That's not the case here, as "herself" isn't the same thing as "magic."

>Twilight reminisced.//

I guess that's supposed to be a speech tag? It isn't punctuated like one, plus it's a very strange choice of speaking verb. Or if it's intended to be a separate sentence, it's really vague.

>"Alternate universe Dash." Applejack reminded her.//

And now you're starting to miss several of these commas when transitioning from speech to narration.

>just leave a book with the details on your greatest weapon just//

That's a word that many authors tend to overuse.

>town/known//

Those are spelled alike, but they don't come anywhere close to rhyming.

>the Everfree itself had died along with it's monstrous inhabitants//

Its/it's confusion.

>Many of them gave the guards furtively glances//

You have an adverb where you need an adjective.

>sofa+quills and sugarcube corner//

Store names would be capitalized, and you got the first one backward.

>the library lacked it's usual quantity of books//

Its/it's confusion.

>in-between//

That's not a place to hyphenate this phrase.

>Hearts and Hooves day//

"Day" is part of the holiday name.

>She might've... hid//

hidden

>ah doubt Rarity would be too keen//

When you use "Ah" in place of "I," you need to capitalize it the same.

>500 yards of your sister, even if she is under 24//

Write out numbers that short.

>top??//

One question mark is plenty.

>there weren't any other passerby//

passersby

>For once luck had favored them, and the Cakes were busy tending to their twin foals in another room.//

So what room were they going into? The Cakes' bedroom? Seems like a bad idea. Pinkie should know what room to try.

>A blue and pink balloon themed bed complimented the yellow walls//

Complimented/complemented confusion again.

Okay, you made enough improvements from the last submission that I started taking detailed notes, but I'm at the end of chapter 7 now, and I'm just finding more and more of the same problems. I'll never get to the end at this rate, and there are lots of stories in the queue, so I'm going to have to stop here. The plot mostly seems fine so far, but I obviously haven't read the whole thing, so there may be problems later on. Lots of mechanical issues, and it's hard to identify with this alternate Twilight when she makes such a snap change in her attitude. Seeing it happen gradually so that the reader fully understands the change will get them invested in the character, but this happens so fast here. Plus we get nothing about the other elements. They're our beloved ones one instant, and the next, they're evil alicorns, and without seeing them descend into that transition, it loses a lot of its power. Demonstration is always going to be more engaging than having to take the narrator's word for a bunch of off-camera stuff.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2777

I normally put my wrap-up comments at the end, but I don't want you to get intimidated by the length of my notes and never get to it. So I'll put them first.

The good. I read this whole thing. I'm a slow reader, and I've only read 2 or 3 stories longer than this, because I simply don't have the time. But you held my interest enough to keep going. Normally, I'd read the first few chapters to get a flavor for things, then skim the rest to make sure it doesn't go off the rails or violate our content standards. Or if I have enough ammo to reject the story in the first chapter alone, then there's not much point in continuing. In fact, I could tell from the first chapter that I'd end up sending this back to you, but I read every word of every chapter anyway, because it was an interesting story.

Now the bad. There's a good story in here, and even the wordsmithing was pretty good, but it gets bogged down in lots of stylistic things. They're all detailed below, so I won't list them here, only to say that the biggest thing was being repetitive. But I am very disappointed at the sheer number of easy-to-detect errors, like missing words, I found that even a cursory proofreading pass would uncover. I don't know that you've done even that. We expect to see well-edited stories; we don't have time to be your proofreading service. It's one thing if you consistently miss a rule of grammar that you might not have known, but when I keep seeing obvious typos, it speaks to lackadaisical editing.

I also want to note that I didn't have time to show you every instance of every problem. I did show you every kind, and from these examples, you should be able to find the rest. If you go only by what I've noted, that's probably only about a quarter of them.

As interesting as the story was, I did find some things odd about it. I agree with one of the commenters who wondered why you put Chrysalis in the role you did if she wasn't going to act anything like Chrysalis. By the end, we get a hint to why (which is a point I'll revisit shortly), but it's over 60k words in before we find out. That's a huge amount of time to expect a reader to just roll along with a character who is Chrysalis in name only. An AU tag only goes so far; you generally want to show basically the same character changed in a small number of ways. Here, we have a character who might as well have been an OC until the one glimmer of canon Chrysalis from her. Even making it clear that something is off about the whole world from the beginning can support this kind of conceit, but you play it straight. For that matter, while Aria and Sonata (Sonata far more so) do behave like their canon selves, they have very different abilities, to the point they also could have easily been OCs without losing anything. Tagging them as characters instead of using the OC tag will get you more viewers, but it's also a bait and switch when those characters share little to nothing with the canon ones. Tirek is the same.

Now, about the reveal of Chrysalis. The story really doesn't complete any of its arcs. Adagio does consolidate her power, but there's a hint about Chrysalis's past that doesn't come to fruition. Chroma arises as an enemy, but she isn't completely dealt with. Echidna also steps up, but they haven't dealt with her. Everything is pretty much sequel bait, and while there's nothing with sequel bait, you still want each story to stand alone well. This just sets the pieces up without knocking any of them down, and as such, it's not a very satisfying read. I began to get the sense that would be the case when I was on chapter 10.

This story really feels like Fellowship of the Ring to me, where it's all establishing the parties and stakes involved, leading up to this pact being formed. The distinguishing factor there is that FotR supplied the back story, too, so that I had the whole picture of what was going on, even though the book itself had kind of a weak stopping point with no real conclusions. Here, I have very little idea of what's going on or why. It's less a standalone work in a series and more a fragment of what should have carried on longer until it resolved some subplot arcs.

It speaks to how engaging the premise is that I stuck with it for the whole ride, and I wouldn't have spent dozens of hours reading and compiling notes if I didn't want you using them to improve the story into something that'd really shine. But it does really need a lot of detail work, and you should give some thought about how self-contained it is.

>treble cleft//

clef

>twenty fourth//

Hyphenate.

You're telling the story in Adagio's perspective, but you do things that are inconsistent with that, like having her point out her own eye and coat color. Why would she bother mentioning those? It's not relevant to what's happening.

>Popping the cork loose, she poured about half the bottle into her goblet//

One thing you have to be careful about with participles is that they make things happen at the same time, so make sure that's what you want. Here, she couldn't pour any until after she'd popped the cork. This is a problem that comes up occasionally.

>stuck up//

Hyphenate your multi-word descriptors.

>sharing in her master’s disdain for the overly pompous Count Fancy Pants.//

That was already evident from what she said. Don't overexplain things. For that matter, this seems to have jumped over to Suri's perspective.

>I’ll need a new dress-//

Please use proper dashes for cutoffs and asides. You use hyphens throughout the story where you shouldn't be. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread.

>Mix'n'match//

Mix 'n' match

>I can talk him into investing into the existing guild//

That second "into" should be an "in," right?

>“I’ve always wanted to visit the Lunar Kingdom anyway,” Adagio smiled.//

You have that last bit punctuated as if it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.

>I have a proposal for you….//

One too many dots there.

>stitched together ensemble//

stitched-together ensemble

>two layer affair//

two-layer affair. I can't keep marking these or I'll never finish the story, so suffice it to say you need to sweep for these.

>feel to the tops of her cannons//

Typo.

>fell to her fetlocks//

And very repetitive to use the same phrasing for both parts.

>Having become satisfied with his efforts//

You'll normally set off an absolute phrase with a comma.

>Just remember Adagio//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>mare that stepped through them//

>a pony that could name every member of said guard//
When referring to a sentient being, you normally use "who" instead of "that."

>ball room//

ballroom

>of which there were copious amounts of//

Redundant "of."

>Count Copper Coin would surely be in attendance and earning some more favor with him couldn’t hurt.//

Here's another thing you do a lot: fail to put commas between clauses.

>looked...upset//

Leave a space after an ellipsis.

>mare,” she placed a hoof on Suri’s back, “put//

Here's how to format a narrative aside in a quote:
mare—” she placed a hoof on Suri’s back “—put
if she stops speaking for the action and:
mare”—she placed a hoof on Suri’s back—“put
if she doesn't.

>really Fancy//

Needs a comma for direct address again. This is an intermittent problem.

Here's another thing you do: use copious amounts of participial phrases. They're a nicely descriptive element, but they also don't turn up too much in everyday conversation, and when something's unusual, it stands out a lot more easily when it keeps turning up. Take these:
>silently judging her//
>Slipping out into the hallway//
>Squeezing her eyes shut//
>threatening to burst forth in a torrent//
>rocking against the cold stone//
These all occur in a span of only six sentences.

>Looking up, her fear of what Fancy Pants might do//

This says her fear looked up.

>Y-your majesty//

The honorific would be capitalized. Looks like you leave it lower case every time you use it.

>Calm yourself my little pony.//

Direct address again. I'm going to stop marking these.

>count//

Titles get capitalized when used as terms of address.

>nervous tick//

tic

>corridors amongst the grand corridors//

Repetitive word use.

>I almost had him forget why he was here?//

That's an awkward phrasing.

>in?” Adagio//

Extraneous space.

>parents'//

There are a few spots like this where you must have edited directly on FiMFiction, because they use simple-style quotation marks and apostrophes, whereas most of the story uses fancy ones.

>The earth pony//

Another descriptor that doesn't fit the perspective. Why would Suri call herself this?

>last part. Her back felt like it had managed to find every last//

>fault but her own. And for all her faults//
Close word repetition.

>wild wilderness//

Seems pretty self-explanatory. There's a reason "wilderness" has "wild" in it.

>The Canterhorn Aqueduct; a snake of sturdy granite that had once supplied the old capital with fresh water.//

For a semicolon to be used properly, you should be able to replace it with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence. A comma would do fine, since it could be an appositive, or a colon would work, since you're making a definition or clarification.

>Eighteen ears of corn were roasting away, lashed to sticks that were angled over the fire.//

You have three instances of "were" very close together here. For one thing, various forms of "to be" are very boring to read, since nothing happens. You should choose active verbs where possible. For another, you're using them as unnecessary auxiliary verbs. If you just wrote this as "Eighteen ears of corn roasted away, lashed to sticks angled over the fire," what would it lose?

>‘kay//

Note that smart quotes will always draw a leading apostrophe backward, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first.

>“Hmm,” Iron Will glanced to the jasmine coated pegasus mare at his side.//

There's another non-speaking action used as a dialogue tag.

>unlady like//

unladylike

>So she sighed and poked Adagio again; harder this time.//

Another misused semicolon.

>almost looking past Suri. “Are we almost//

>probably start by introducing ourselves to Mayor Glimmer. She probably//
More close repetition.

>families that controlled//

Use "who."

>What does that even mean?

When you have an exclamation mark or question mark on a word italicized for emphasis, include it in the italics.

>a thin flow of ponies were//

The subject is "flow," which doesn't agree in number with the verb "were."

>laying on that hard to define line//

"Laying" takes a direct object. You want "lying."

>guess though, she'd guess//

Close repetition.

>ponies that//

who

>“Will,” she nodded towards the crowds.//

Non-speaking action used as a dialogue tag.

>Pressing onwards their path//

This says that their path pressed onward, not that they did.

>It’s small yard//

It's/its confusion.

>“Well, space is something of a premium in Ponyville,” Adagio shrugged.//

Non-speaking action used as a dialogue tag again. I'm going to have to stop marking these, too.

>As it should have.//

What does "it" refer to? The gates, right? So why is it singular?

>neatly planted flowers//

You just had a "neatly" in the previous paragraph.

>She ran a hoof down its rough surface//

Same problem. You have a singular "its" referring to plural objects.

>She turned her attention to the rest of her guards while they galloped off.//

This sounds like the rest of the guards are galloping off.

>hoof falls//

That'd be one word, the same as "footfalls."

>Sugar Belle took the lead//

Repetitive with what Adagio just said.

>pony that sold it to me//

who

>This confused Adagio//

What comes after this already illustrates the point, so it's redundant to say it so bluntly up front.

>Setup//

As one word, this is a noun, but you're trying to use it as a verb.

>to not//

This kind of phrasing should have the words in reverse order.

>Adagio’s expression had changed to one of suspicion.//

But she's the limited narrator. How can she even see it to make that evaluation? Besides, that's not what would clue her in to the emotion. You don't have to look into a mirror to know you're angry, after all. How would suspicion manifest itself internally? Through her thoughts, physical sensations, more deliberate actions than observing her own expression.

>declared, voice dripping with a smug sense of pride, as if she had just declared//

Close word repetition.

>miss Glimmer//

"Miss" would be capitalized when attached to a name.

>self assured//

"Self" words get hyphenated.

>tower, near the towering//

Repetitive.

>Aromatic odors of cooking//

That's an awkward phrasing.

>The ever so slight tingle in her nostrils told Adagio that the food served here used a bit more spice than some of the other establishments she had dined at in her life.//

The previous scene had been in Suri's perspective, and she's the first character mentioned in this scene, so the presumption will be that she holds the perspective. It's not until here that I discover you actually want Adagio's viewpoint. You need to be clear right at the beginning of each scene whose perspective it represents.

>The smell of food had gotten her own stomach growling at the thought of an early lunch, so she followed after, her mind contemplating the nature of the food waiting inside.//

Repetitive use of "food."

>realizies//

realsies

>....I’m//

One too many dots there. Four-dot ellipses are really only for formal writing.

>The cursed nature of the Everfree, was one of those stories that never went away.//

Why in the world is that comma there?

>Lumberjacks that dared//

Use "who."

>upto//

Typo.

>the forest itself//

>The lodge itself//
Repetitive phrasing in consecutive sentences.

>Its shining eyes peered at Adagio for a moment, before beginning to preen.//

Its eyes began to preen?

>tribest//

As a parallel to things like racist or sexist, it should have the same -ist ending.

>I’d suggest that you bite your tongue.//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

I guess I don't see the point of visiting the lodge. It took up a significant enough amount of the chapter that I would have expected something momentous, but it was just Adagio overhearing something, asking about it, and verifying that it would happen. Then she leaves. That's pretty mundane.

>mane her, forelegs//

Misplaced comma.

>wings twitching with a nervous energy with a pale blueish-purple coat and neat blonde mane//

That phrasing is really weird.

>Woah//

Please, please don't be among the majority of ponyfic authors who can't spell this.

>mysterious ponies and their associate was indeed a mystery//

That's pretty self-explanatory.

>in a form of argument//

Odd phrasing.

>on her back. “Aria! I don’t want your bird on my back//

Repetitive. And then you have another "back" just a couple sentences later, even though it's used in a different sense.

>her parent’s bedroom//

She only had one parent? This turns up more than once.

>resting on the mantle//

You use this exact phrasing again in the next sentence.

>amaturely//

Spelling.

>its razor honed edge cleft into the wood//

That's not an accepted participle form of "cleave."

>the sheer horrible goofiness of the lines they had just finished throwing at each other//

That's really explain-y. And it smacks of having to assure the reader that a joke was funny. If he doesn't already know that, then it wasn't.

>Spitfire rolled her eyes//

Repetitive. Will did the exact same thing not one sentence ago.

The story's starting to feel like a series of fetch quests. Not that a story can't function as such, but it's really hard to keep those interesting once the word count gets up there, and by now, I'm over 20k into the story, which is awfully far in to still feel like a series of fetch quests.

>hob-knob//

hobnob

>Adagio lead the way into Ponyville.//

The past tense is "led."

>Laughing to herself Adagio’s spirits rose//

This says Adagio's spirits laughed to herself.

>She could feel her anger beginning to rise again//

>which made her all the more angry//
You're fairly often blunt with emotion like this instead of demonstrating it. What evidence is there of her anger? (What does she do? How would it show up in the narrative tone? How does it make her feel, physically?)

>focus on Starlight. If she was going to try something, Adagio needed to focus//

Close repetition.

>assuage a guilty- noble- conscious//

conscience

>that was flaw//

Missing word.

>it should be effecting Ponyville already//

You need "affecting" there. As phrased, it means the storm is causing Ponyville to be there.

>imperius//

Spelling.

>pegasi cold resistance//

Noun adjuncts are singular. You don't say "hams sandwiches," for instance.

>being shook//

shaken

>Aria grit her teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>storm like//

Most of these "like" descriptors you use should be hyphenated or a single word. But my main point is that you use these an awful lot.

>hoofidly//

hoofedly

>I will have conversation with her//

Missing word.

>stop bringing up my parents?//

>do anything about them?//
Italicize the question mark.

>cisterns worth/

In that phrasing, use a possessive.

>streets that lead out of the square//

led

>dependant//

Spelling.

>since it’s founding//

Its/it's confusion.

>Ranger’s later.//

Why is that possessive?

>Let Sombra and I//

People are so afraid of misusing "me" that they make this kind of mistake. "Sombra and I" is equivalent to "we." "Sombra and me" is equivalent to "us." Which sounds right, "let us" or "let we"?

I wonder why Adagio is having so much trouble swimming. I assume because the situation's specifically designed to make it difficult, but there's no indication of that, and horses are naturally pretty good swimmers.

>somehow accusatory. This was all Adagio’s fault somehow//

Repetition.

>only to bump into something else//

>only to face Sonata Dusk//
Repetitive phrasing.

>somehow floating just to block her path//

And that comes soon after those other uses of "somehow" I just noted.

>vice like//

vicelike

>flickering candles. In the flickering//

Repetition.

>mlady//

Missing a letter or apostrophe.

>*hic*//

Don't put the asterisks around that.

>S-sugarcoat//

If it's a word like a name that has to be capitalized under any circumstances, then you need to capitalize all instances of the first letter in a stutter.

>t-think//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. That word doesn't even have a "t" sound in it.

>Adagio grit her teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>T-the//

Same deal with what sound would be repeated.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2778

>>2777
>mayor Glimmer//
When attached to a name, a title gets capitalized.

>sun up//

sunup

>the stunned baroness//

Adagio is the perspective character. Why would she describe herself in such an abstract way? People don't do that.

>Ignoring that crack//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>Thank you, consul//

Capitalize the title used as an address.

>What, is that?//

There's no reason to have a comma there. They aren't for dramatic pauses.

>“Not that many,” Spitfire answered.//

Chroma didn't ask how many. She asked how often.

>occasional explores crazy enough//

Typo.

>no…,”//

The comma only replaces a period, not any other kinds of punctuation.

>can not//

cannot

>squeek//

Typo.

>seemed content to let Suri hold the tray. Her horn began to glow, brighter and brighter, before the lady of storms seemed//

Repetition, but "seem" is a weak verb that should only be used sparingly anyway.

>YOUR MAYOR, STARLIGHT GLIMMER//

Needs another comma on the other side of the appositive.

It's a little strange that while in Starlight's perspective, we never get to see why she so suddenly changes her attitude toward Adagio. To battle Chroma, sure, but it's treated very stoically, like Starlight neither reconsiders her position or only reluctantly seeks Adagio's aid.

>every step sent burning lances of pain through Adagio’s body//

You already used that exact phrasing just a dozen or so paragraphs back.

>But she grit her teeth and pushed ahead.//

She sure is gritting her teeth a lot. And they all have the wrong past tense.

>a few more step//

Typo.

>pair were lounging on a pair//

Repetition.

>the right stallion said//

Why do you need to qualify that? You said only one was a stallion, so it's not like there's a left stallion.

>besides the point//

beside

>ally lip//

I have no idea what this is trying to say.

>counter attack//

counterattack

>directions.” Starlight answered.//

That sure sounds like a speech tag, so the dialogue needs to end with a comma.

>“Adagio-"//

You've got a mix of quotation mark styles there.

>Approaching them, her eyes practically blazed with anger.//

This says that her eyes approached them, not that she did.

>You hid here I presume//

Needs a comma.

>surprize//

Typo. This happens more than once.

>The water soaking the fields just added to the misery.//

This is already the third mention of "soak" in the chapter, and we're on paragraph three. The first two were more thematic, but this one doesn't appear to be.

>lances of pain//

You keep calling them that.

>Pushing those dark thoughts aside for the moment//

You'll usually set off participial phrases with a comma.

>her temper already growing short with Sonata’s mangling of her name//

Set off the absolute phrase with a comma.

>everypony that’s//

Use "who."

>deciding that Starlight had been battered enough for now//

Don't over-explain this.

>really-,//

Extraneous comma.

>the hoof//

Extraneous space.

>There was far too many conflicting tones//

Number mismatch: was... tones.

>Breathing in and out//

Set off the participle with a comma.

>companion's’//

What's going on here?

>squinting at what what bits//

Repeated word.

>pushing her way through the underbrush and picking her way//

Repetitive phrasing. I'm only grabbing occasional instances of repetition, either ones I'm afraid you wouldn't catch or ones of a type I hadn't noted before.

>The shadows were oppressive, every one of them could be hiding a monster and the ongoing roar of the storm would made it hard to hear anything lurking its way towards her.//

Comma splice.

>pegasi weather resistance//

pegasus

>The temptation to lay down//

Lay/lie confusion.

>her head hung low and her shoulder’s sagged//

Extraneous apostrophe.

>Her mane, blown out of their usual pigtail style//

"Their" is a plural pronoun, but it's referring to "mane," a singular noun.

>For she probably wouldn’t get up again if she did.//

That "for" is really awkward. Drop it.

>Panic gripped Aria’s chest now//

But the narration doesn't sound panicked. Plus you've mentioned panic a fair amount lately.

>deadlocks//

Unless their hair likes to argue, you probably want "dreadlocks."

>tieing//

tying.

>and you had beasts//

It's probably best to avoid talking to the reader, unless you're going to establish who the reader is and talk to him regularly throughout the story. You could make it a quoted thought, and then it would work. Or you could rephrase it without "you."

>just couldn’t get high enough with one broken wing and the stones were just//

Repetition, and pay particular attention to this word. It's one many authors tend to overuse.

>took a firm hold of the nets and hauled Aria up like a fish in a net//

The imagery of her being in a net kind of loses its power when she's actually in a net.

>captors. They//

Extraneous space.

>calm, leader//

This comma shouldn't be there.

>pony like//

Make that one word or hyphenate it.

>re-aligning himself on the pack again//

The "re" is redundant with the "again," and "aligning" is a strange word choice. Maybe you meant "alighting"?

>charge head//

ahead

>Caprataur’s have Aria//

Why is that possessive? You need a plural.

>Heartlands is//

Number mismatch.

>...Even if it ended up being the right decision in the long run.//

A leading ellipsis is for a previously suspended thought, or for something just becoming audible (the speaker is coming into earshot, the listener is waking up, etc.). This doesn't really warrant one.

>We...we can’t…"//

Here's a side effect of not leaving a space after an ellipsis. Similar to smart quotes, some word processors will automatically convert three consecutive periods into a single-character ellipsis, but it won't do that if an alphanumeric character follows it. It will if the next thing is a space or punctuation. Based on that, you've gotten one of each kind here. It's better if they're consistent. And here's yet another spot where your style of quotation marks varies.

>ponies that had angered her//

Use "who."

>we most like will have to face Chroma//

likely

>trampled grass//

How does trampling result from the storm?

>sense of menace that permuted the very air//

Sounds like you meant "permeated."

>It was a little gesture but one that signaled to Adagio that Lightning had been smiling through the pain, as it were.//

You're over-explaining things again.

>Suri wasn’t prepared to take that response unchallenged through.//

I assume that's supposed to be "though."

>That one,” she jabbed a hoof at Adagio, “didn’t even know what a caprataur was! ”//

Extraneous space at the end, but it also looks like you're trying to do a narrative aside again. Use the format I showed you earlier.

>the occasional flashes of lightning providing its//

You have a singular "its" referring to a plural "flashes."

>strike, her muscles tightening, ready to strike//

More repetition.

>the camps construction//

Missing apostrophe.

>from the rocky wall to wide open gap//

Missing word.

>A few caprataurs, were gathering water from their reservoir in clay jugs.//

Why is that comma there?

>due either being female or too young for them to have grown in yet//

Missing word, and this is the third aside in the paragraph. This is another type of structure that gets repetitive when used too often.

>From there was an unwashed mass of caprataur’s crouching half in the rain//

The "from there" is awkward, and you have another possessive that needs to be a plural.

>half in crude shelter//

Missing word. I don't know why you suddenly have a bunch more of this careless kind of error in this chapter.

>the right wall of depression//

Missing word. I'm finding too many of these to keep marking them. You need to read over the story word by word to find these.

>least…” Starlight trailed off//

Redundant.

>I like a little to be flashy with magic as much as the next mage//

That "a little" sounds unnatural there.

>Equal parts dread and anger//

More directly naming emotions.

>heros//

heroes

>along side//

alongside

>most absolute vile//

absolutely

>Ontop//

Typo.

>Tough as old, battered leather.//

Leather? As in the tanned hides of dead sentient cows? Why would a pony be that acquainted with it?

>lance of pain//

Oh, so Aria gets those now, too?

>leader that had caught her//

Use "who."

>all mighty//

almighty

>She was the only one among the group that//

Use "who."

>a mix of tired looking, focused or on the verge of nodding off.//

"Mix" usually goes with "and," not "or," and aren't "tired-looking" and "on the verg of nodding off" essentially the same thing?

>any pony//

anypony

>he topped off the side of his timberwolf//

toppled

>They moved as fast as they could, pumping legs and wings with as much power as they could muster.//

That pretty much says the same thing twice.

>franticly//

frantically

>Stop failing//

Typo, but repetitive with the narration just saying she was flailing.

>as she lead the way//

The past tense is "led."

>what might lay beyond//

Lay/lie confusion.

>“half baked”,//

>“local color”.//
Punctuation goes inside the quotation marks.

>a sharp snap sound//

Phrasing is off, and the comma that comes after this is a splice.

>It’s tip glowed//

Its/it's confusion.

>incase//

in case

>shadows; invisible or imaginary.//

Misused semicolon.

>dryly as a desert//

You have an adverb where an adjective would be more appropriate.

>Let’s rest of the night.//

Phrasing is off.

>It was only after she and her friends had become powerful, had ascended, were they able//

The syntax is off here. The phrasing would either go without the initial "it was," or the "were they able" would be "that they were."

>how far removed from Equestria, The Heartlands really were//

No reason to have a comma there.

>She mulled over//

Mulled over what? It's a transitive verb; it needs a direct object.

>having been around the stallion for not even half a day yet and Chroma//

That "and shouldn't be there, you need a comma after "yet," and I'd lose the other "yet" you have at the beginning of the sentence so you don't have two of them.

>For an idiot he was.//

Then why is he still in that position of authority? Couldn't Chroma remove him? That brings up another issue. You're using Chroma as your perspective character here, and she's said she doesn't want to be called that, so why is she using it to refer to herself?

>sloven//

slovenly

>plast//

Typo.

You're inconsistent at capitalizing "rangers."

>the instinct to run punching through his alcohol addled mind//

Chroma wouldn't know this, so you're jumping to his perspective for some reason.

>snakled//

snaked

>Spitfire’s brow furrowed as her mind began to sort out the full reality of the situation.//

Now you're dipping into Spitfire's perspective.

>hadn’t actually ever spoke//

spoken

>ex-baronesses’//

There's only one baroness. ex-baroness's

>had ran//

had run

>A bolt of lightning struck the ground and inch from her hooves.//

Typo.

>lept//

leapt

>There was a message to deliver and justice to mete out//

And now you're going into the crow's perspective? I guess you do sometimes see brief glimpses at a different perspectives and the ends of scenes, but this is an odd choice for one.

>With a strangled caw, in toppled backwards//

Typo. A lot of these are pretty careless errors that you should have been able to catch on a quick read-through of your own work. Not knowing some of the more difficult rules of grammar is one thing, but this is pretty basic.

>And as the last bits fades away//

Typo.

>edge of the rim//

The rim is the edge.

>crack of dawn revelries//

They're... partying at dawn? That doesn't seem like military discipline. Are you sure you don't mean reveilles?

>The act of running of a restaurant//

Phrasing is off.

>Sonata Sat//

Capitalization.

>wraped//

Spelling.

>building up and appetite//

Typo.

>strew//

Typo.

>these pony’s//

Mixing plural and singular.

>It’s art, philosophy, and architecture were without peer!//

Its/it's confusion.

>’re the only ponies trying to do anything about Chroma...she won’t be stopped unless we do something about her.//

Repetitive phrasing.

>Time to see what laid beyond the darkness.//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Huffing slightly, her whole body//

This says her whole body huffed.

>“Hey, everypony!” Lightning Dust announced having returned from one of the caves and she was wearing a massive grin on her face,“I found the road!”//

The narration bit is missing a couple of commas, and the way you go back into the quote with a comma means both parts of the quote come together to form a single sentence, yet you gave end punctuation to the first part. Plus you're missing the space between the comma and the quotation marks.

>She, Aria, Sonata and Suri just watched this display with a mixture of bemused, confused and annoyed expressions.//

Lightning apparently holds the perspective here. Aside from this being blunt with the emotions again, you're having her somehow see and evaluate her own facial expression in an external fashion.

>sametime//

Typo.

>maintained stone. It was difficult to maintain//

Another example of close repetition.

>but by Lightning’s reckoning they had walked quite a while before the first glimmer of something besides an unending stretch of tunnel.//

Seems like you meant to have more to that sentence, like an action for the glimmer.

>The ancient buildings in all their finery remains//

Typo. Or maybe something else? For some reason, you switch to present tense for the rest of this paragraph.

>and it they continued to follow//

That's a valid construction, but one that's going to cause most readers to stumble the first time through it.

>wars and diplomacy alike//

>buildings and statuary alike//
These are in consecutive sentences.

>I don’t know too many other ponies who’d actually find old scrolls and books about farming, interesting.//

Why is that comma there?

>These ones mostly depicted ponies engaged in making artwork of their own; painting and sculpting mostly.//

Two uses of "mostly" in the same sentence. I'm only pulling out maybe a quarter of the instances of repetition I'm seeing.

>anymore//

"Anymore" isn't the same thing as "any more." You picked the wrong one here.

>those that had their weapons, drew them before advancing as a group again//

No reason to have that comma.

>the darkness head//

I don't know what you mean by "head" here.

>a massive open hole that was once a lake of some kind//

What's their evidence of this? That's a strange conclusion to draw about a generic hole.

>Every step they took kicked up dust from a carpet of crumbled grass and picked their way past half crumbled stone benches.//

This says that their steps picked their way, not that they did.

>“This must have been open to the sky at one point,” Starlight mused, looking above their heads.//

So they're in a strange underground city listening to creepy music, indicating someone else must be there, and they're just very calmly talking and not trying to be the least bit stealthy? Why would they do this?

>It could come from any number of sources//

And they just barely got away from several encounters where everyone was trying to kill them. Why are they suddenly going to assume this is the one encounter that'll go smoothly?

>Aria lapsed into silence remained locked in a fierce glower.//

Syntax is off.

>It was vitally important that she find out where this gold had come from.//

That's a pretty clinical phrasing. It states the fact, but it doesn't express her mood about it. Remember, it's not just what you say but how you say it.

>different, ornate//

You don't need the comma, since these describe different aspects. Another way to tell (sometimes) is that if you reverse the order, they sound really awkward. That generally means a comma isn't needed.

>The gems had been cut so well that Lightning didn’t think she could see a single flaw on their surfaces.//

Not surprising, since they don't have to be done that well before you need magnification to see a flaw.

>But...please,” she winced//

How do you wince a sentence?

>But then she slowly, she let out a deep sigh//

Syntax is off.

>For the music cut out at that moment a large illusion spell on the high cave ceiling puffing out with it.//

Syntax is off. This is happening a lot in this chapter. I wonder how it's escaped your notice. Don't you read back over your work before you publish it?

>Landing hard, the wind was forced from her lungs for a moment.//

This says the wind landed hard.

>It’s carapace//

Its/it's confusion.

>it dangled light a straight waterfall//

Typo.

>chaotic//

You use this twice just a couple paragraphs apart.

>sixty feet distance//

In this kind of phrasing, it's "sixty-foot."

>and sound//

With the long parenthetical phrase before this, it wasn't apparent at first how this bit was supposed to parse.

>greensleeves//

Capitalize.

>massive bulk//

You'd already described it as such not long ago.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2779

>>2777
>>2778
>over-sized//
That's just a single word, no hyphen.

>A final, rattling grasp,//

I have to think you meant "gasp." And the comma after it has no business being there.

>Chorma//

Typo.

>she looked glanced//

Extraneous word.

>It seems that none of them had left yet either.//

Switched to present tense.

>Sassaflash was laying on her stomach//

Lay/lie confusion.

>the sound of pounding on manor’s front door//

Missing word.

>adult hood//

adulthood

>The bath just overflowed!//

Wait the upstairs bathtub overflowed without any of the downstairs plumbing getting backed up? How does that happen?

>While she trailed off//

Redundant with the fact that her dialogue ended with an ellipsis.

>destroying the pony’s homes//

Presumably you meant that to affect more than one pony (who apparently owns multiple homes).

>Your highness//

The whole term is an honorific, and it would be capitalized.

>tore mighty furrow//

Missing word.

>As the broken stone rained down upon Sombra, he rolled back to his hooves summoning a pair of crystalline swords as he went.//

You're using an awful lot of "as" clauses around here, to the point they're becoming repetitive. But it's especially clunky to have two in the same sentence, as you're over-specifying the synchronization.

>the quarrels clattering uselessly against it//

You just called them bolts. It's a subtle difference, but bolts and quarrels aren't the same thing.

>Chomra//

Typo.

>had lead her fellow guards//

The past tense is "led."

>pegasai//

Typo.

>Sugarcoat did have point though.//

Missing word.

>empty grain sacks laying around//

Lay/lie confusion.

>We,” she waved a hoof at her fellow guards, “have//

Use that narrative aside formatting I showed you.

>out pace//

outpace

>straight!Why//

Missing space.

>They had the beginnings of a riot on their hooves and while Ponyville might be full of brave ponies, but with the stormcrows, it could turn into a massacre.//

That "but" doesn't parse.

>The crow leapt into the air, kicking out with its hind legs//

Huh? Crows don't have hind legs.

>pegasai weather resistance//

pegasus

>Ya’ll//

Another word that I can't believe the majority of authors can't spell.

>you and the lot that can still walk, will get these injured out of here and stay out of our way!//

No reason to have a comma there.

>change tacts//

Change tack or change tactics, depending on what exactly you mean.

>lest the detonation scattered//

"Lest" goes with infinitive forms, so just use "scatter."

>your majesty//

Capitalize the honorific. But also note that when you used "highness" earlier, that's the proper address for a prince or princess. This one is used for a king or queen.

>Sombra grit his teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>push onto Ponyville//

"Onto" and "on to" don't mean the same thing. What you have means to move to the surface of Ponyville.

>stormcrows. Another//

Extraneous space.

>With the tunnels of Centum Cellae behind them now//

It's always a strange thing to have the first reference to a character in a scene be via pronoun, since there's no antecedent for it. There are times it works to keep the person's identity vague, but there's no reason for that here. Even if you don't name names and use something generic like "the group," it's better than just using a "them" when you haven't said who they are.

>She wondered how it was fairing?//

That isn't a question. And in this sense, it's "faring."

>Don’t you pegasai//

pegasi

>between the group//

That's not a good place to use "between." For one, it refers to there being two things; for more than that, "among" is the correct choice. But "in the middle" or some such is a more normal phrasing anyway.

>There’s no record of where they were placed afterwords//

An afterword is like an epilogue or author's note.

>They were just…unexpected.//

I don't know what "they" is. The things Sonata said? You hadn't been referring to them in the plural.

>aligning itself//

That's a weird phrasing. Maybe you meant "alighting"? If so, don't use "itself."

>Equestrian Mints wide open arches//

Missing apostrophe.

>it had brought with all the memories//

Missing word.

>cowardliness//

"Cowardice" is probably a better, simpler word to use here.

>While you were dealing with the mint//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing "mint." Unless you're using it as a title, you don't have to, but even in that case, you're mixing and matching.

>the bustling ponies that worked on them//

When you're talking about sentient creatures, use "who" instead of "that."

>As they continued towards Roam//

You're leaning on those "as" clauses again. Starting here, you have four of them in just three sentences.

>Pausing for a moment, her tail//

This says her tail paused. It also says the action that follows happens at the same time as the pause, which is contradictory.

>You have all of us to.//

That's either an incomplete sentence, or you've confused to/too.

>The sparser cloud cover finally allowing some non-alchemical created light into their lives.//

You haven't been in the habit of using sentence fragments in the narration, so this doesn't feel like it belongs.

>The close packed brick constructed insula apartments giving way to the wealthier single family domus built from marble and other more expensive materials.//

Same deal.

>atriums//

atria

>round about//

roundabout

>It lead us away from the caprataurs//

You don't need to capitalize this, since it still parses as part of the same thought, and the past tense is "led."

>What was it dad said?//

Family relations get capitalized when effectively used as names. So it'd be "What was it Dad said?" but "What was it her dad said?"

>A single doorway lead//

led

>the sizes all all off//

Typo.

>a icey//

an icy

>an and end//

Typo.

>Apparently it's rainbow nature wasn’t part of her alicorn state.//

Its/it's confusion.

>Ariar’s//

Typo.

>Key words, would still be the best way//

Why is that comma there?

>Starlight…,//

Don't use a comma with an ellipsis.

>it’s body was full of holes//

Its/it's confusion.

>it was been unmistakable//

Syntax is off.

>how so hopelessly naive//

I'd go with only one of "how" or "so." As phrased, it sounds like she's asking a question.

>She had barely began//

begun

>The leather ranger armor//

They make armor out of the cows they talk to?

>The next vision took place inside//

This is an odd lead-in. For one thing, it makes Adagio seem very aware that it isn't real, and I haven't gotten that sense so far. But it also makes it feel less in the moment with her, as if she's cataloging things instead of experiencing this very unexpected and disturbing imagery. When something like that happens, you probably wouldn't have the wherewithal to reflect on it until afterward.

>collection of scrolls were piled//

"Collection" is treated as a singular noun, so you need "was."

>We’re coming in?//

That's really strange as a question.

>“Destroyer of Dreams”,//

Comma goes in the quotes.

>He extended a clawed half//

Half what? I don't understand.

>now had a purple gem was set//

Syntax is off.

>Sonata’s was a light, airy pink color, Aria a sturdy looking orange and Suri a striking red color//

Note how you start (correctly) using a possessive, then switch to plain names for the rest.

>came up her fetlocks//

Missing a "to" in there?

>the magic of the Elements having fixed the broken one//

>happy that the damage to her horn had likewise been healed..//
Well, that's inordinately convenient. And the second one has an extra period.

>....I//

One dot too many.

>I’m honored to that you think that I’m worthy//

Extraneous word.

>spoiled, power hungry, vainglorious, excuse//

Don't put a comma after the last item in the list.

>The sixth element, isn’t just magic//

Why is that comma there?

>a monsters//

Plural/singular mismatch.

>a different tact//

I commented on this tact/tack confusion earlier.

>I have friends now that can help//

Use "who," not "that."

>If you wish to stay hiding down here//

Missing your opening quotation marks. You're fine at leaving the closing ones off the previous paragraph, but you do have to refresh the opening ones for a new paragraph.

>self evident//

Hyphenate.

>I have made me case.//

Typo. And she really hasn't made her case. She just made a vague statement about how they should consider using a politician for once, but she didn't really say anything persuasive. I'm not sure why she thought that'd be enough.

>finding herself laying on the floor//

Lay/lie confusion, and you use these "found herself" phrasings quite a bit.

>to sent Chroma packing//

Typo.

>guess work//

guesswork

>inbetween bits//

in-between bits

>doing a happy loop around his master//

Ambiguous way to describe Aria, since you just described him as Master Tirek.

>Tirek’s eyes lit up as she took in the group.//

Who is "she" here?

>Both his cheer and sentence were cut off//

I can already see that because of what should be a dash. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>the Elements presence//

Missing apostrophe.

>lept//

Spelling.

>slamming her to the ground and pressing a hoof against her head//

>She began to press down on Aria’s head//
So after she pressed a hoof against Aria's head, she began pressing a hoof against Aria's head?

>shattering dispelling//

Needs a comma or an "and."

>She and her friends began to rise from the ground, slipping free of their bonds. Rainbow motes of light began to flow between them//

You really needs to watch how many times you use "begin" or "start" actions. They're starting to get repetitive, but they're also rarely necessary. It's obvious that any given action will begin. It's only worth pointing out that beginning when it's significant for some reason, like it's abrupt, or the action never finishes.

>The magic reached its crescendo//

People often say this erroneously, but it's nonsensical. The error arises from thinking "crescendo" means a peak, but it doesn't. It means an increase.

>pegasai//

Seriously, do a search and replace of that spelling.

>I was so wrapped up in the fact we beat Chroma that I forgot about her third part!//

Not to mention that Adagio seemed to forget about Chrysalis's fate.

>north west//

northwest

>Turning to face Adagio and her friends, she//

This says Adagio's the one turning to face her friends and... herself, somehow.

>journies//

journeys

This aside about Cirrus feels really shoehorned in. Many readers aren't going to get the reference, and indeed, such clouds appear in many different things, so it can be difficult to pinpoint exactly which one you mean.

>“So...how do you make this thing goooooooo-” Adagio began, only to break into a shriek//

A word about cutoffs. When speech get cut off, the very next thing in the story needs to be what cut it off, be it speech or an action. The fact that the narrator gets to wedge in "Adagio began, only to" undercuts the sense of suddenness and delays the effect from the cause.

>Tiiirrrreeeeeeekkkkk!//

Pay attention to how this would actually be pronounced. How do you prolong a "k" sound without sounding like you're hacking up something from your throat? In this situation, you wouldn't do that.

>The ramshackle easily covered half the mountain//

The ramshackle what?

>Continuing to channel,.//

Something got messed up here.

>Bolt, after bolt, after bolt//

You don't need those commas.

>most of them wide as a house//

That's not the way real lightning works. They can appear wide, just because they're too bright to perceive accurately, but the actually bolt is very thin.

>Chroma cackled with glee//

You already had her as gleeful earlier in the paragraph.

>blow her hooves//

Typo.

>Ponyvillian’s//

You're using a possessive where you need a plural.

>Oh my…,”//

No comma. It would only replace a period, and it doesn't get used in conjunction with any other punctuation.

>“Stars above…,”//

>“Woah…,” Aria muttered.//
Please stop putting commas after ellipses, and please, please, please, learn to spell "whoa."

>“...Stars above.”//

Why is Adagio saying the same thing as Suri? If it's intentional repetition, you have to do something to acknowledge it. Otherwise it comes across as an oversight.

>pointed to there once being some manner of city having been built there//

That's a really convoluted phrasing.

>the ash up to their fetlocks//

Set off the absolute phrase with a comma.

A word about your descriptions.
>Starlight had managed to land them near a jagged looking cave, running into the depths of the mountain. A relatively flat patch of mountain ground surrounded it, maybe large enough for a house or two to stand side by side upon. A few charred posts behind them pointed to a bridge having been there at one point, while a half collapsed pile of cinders and ash beneath a charred outline to their right pointed to what may have been a set of stairs before the conflagration. Perhaps more worrying and unmistakable though were the smoky tendrils of blackness that still clung to the cave edge.//
It just gets annoying when the narration keeps adding qualifiers or saying very vague things. Give me things that are definitive, concrete. Look how much you waffle in this paragraph. It's not jagged, it's jagged-looking. It's not flat, it's relatively flat. It's not large enough to encompass a house, it's "maybe" large enough to hold "one or two" houses. It wasn't a staircase, it may have been one. It's not more worrying, it's perhaps so. A little of this is fine, but in the aggregate, this is just telling me the narrator doesn't know anything and is engaging in all kinds of conjecture. I don't want conjecture. I want to know facts.

>way.” Lightning Dust argued.//

Punctuation.

>thing they could hear were//

Number agreement: thing -> were

>blood curdling//

bloodcurdling

>ASCRAIDS//

I have no idea what this means anyway, but you'd been spelling it differently.

>mid air//

midair

>Instinctively, she went for her rapier, thrusting it at the fuzzy little death ball.//

Since I'm on the last chapter anyway, I'll point out another example of something that's been a problem throughout the story. Look at this paragraph. I skipped the first sentence to copy this one out, because the first one is the only one that doesn't end in a participial phrase. The sentence structures in this paragraph are incredibly repetitive.

>these little ponies fault//

Missing apostrophe.

>The only talking I’m interested in doing, involves both of you surrendering.//

Why do you have a comma there?

>The following few minutes were among the most terrifying of Adagio’s life//

And yet the limited narration in her perspective is awfully bland about it. A limited narration is supposed to take on the character's voicing. If she's terrified, the narration should sound like she is.

>We got out flanks//

Typo.

>when it shows it’s snout//

Its/it's confusion.

>Jeese//

Usually spelled jeez, geez, or geeze.

>sick more monsters on me//

sic

>serpentinite//

serpentine

>It was still amazing to Raindrops how fast the remaining Everfree Rangers had been subdued.//

She's supposedly startled by Sombra asking her the question, and it makes her jump. So how does she have time to muse on this entire paragraph before reacting to it? By detaching the reaction so far from the cause, it loses cohesion.

>Everfree forest//

"Forest" would be capitalized as well. It's part of the name.

At this point, I wonder what Apple Bloom's perspective on her sister is. Or if it even is her sister in this world. Otherwise, I'm surprised nobody's asked her, since they all know Applejack will be a potential enemy.

>Suri grit her teeth//

gritted

>Across the way, Adagio grit her teeth//

One sentence later, and she's doing it, too?

>tatzelwurm//

Canon spells it "tatzlwurm."

>windy pattern//

I'd suggest using "winding," or it sounds like you're talking about air.

>wurms beady little eyes//

Missing apostrophe.

>“Thank you Aria,” Adagio nodded.//

How do you nod dialogue?

>the beasts side//

Missing apostrophe.

>mountain side//

mountainside

>guess work//

guesswork

>Then….//

One dot too many.

>greencoat//

Capitalize.

>It was unmistakably her to//

To/too confusion.

>Echidna’s voice then began to rise over Aria’s, her tune becoming more forceful and quicker paced. The tatzelwurms began to shake the confusion from their heads//

Two more examples of those "began" actions, and in consecutive sentences, no less.

>As she came in low, her horn began to glow as she summoned up a spell.//

And the "as" clauses are still being overused. Two in a single sentence here, and the previous sentence has one, too.

>Element’s rainbow//

There's more than one element, but you have a singular possessive.

>as Chroma’s castle was exposed and began to list to the side as it crumbled//

Two more "as" clauses and a "began" action in the same sentence.

>Despite the bright and sunny they found themselves in//

The bright and sunny what?

>your majesty//

Capitalize.

>Considering that nature of the visions//

Phrasing is off.

>her friend’s assault wounding her just as emotionally//

So put that on display. Don't just expect me to take your word for it.

>neither Sombra nor Chrysalis were//

With an either/or or neither/nor structure, the verb takes the number of the last item. So, since you'd say "Chrysalis was," that's the one to use.

>for not long after King Sombra arrived//

I'd recommend a comma before his name, or it sounds like you're saying something happened not long after he arrived.

>always….my//

One dot too many.

>the what that would all entail//

Extraneous "the."

>“Thank you.”.//

Extraneous period.

>mane bane//

I don't know what you were trying to say here.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2780

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>This night, however, she came to notice her former student had been spending a lot of extra time in the library.//

You just called her a "former student" two sentences ago, and you still haven't mentioned her name. You ought to change one of the two.

>Wha-!//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs and asides.

>a rather tired Starlight Glimmer jumped frantically in the air on the intrusion//

You have that lower-case like it's a speech attribution, but there's no speaking verb.

>calming on seeing it was the Princess//

Let me see this happen. What exactly does Starlight do to make Twilight conclude she's calmed down?

>the unicorn admitted//

You're definitely using a limited narrator in Twilight's perspective. Just look at your second paragraph, where you use an informal, conversational style, and you have the narrator expressing Twilight's thoughts. This means that I'm to take the narration as Twilight's stream of consciousness. Would she really refer to Starlight, someone she knows well, as "the unicorn"? Do you internally think of your grandfather as "the gray-haired man"? People just don't take such an abstract and external view of others they know.

>thing, done as soon as possible//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Where Pinkie Pie was involved trouble and craziness was sure to follow.//

And you do need a comma here, to separate the clauses.

>the alicorn’s twitching gaze//

You already said earlier in the same paragraph that her eye was twitching, and worse than Twilight internally referring to her own friend Starlight as "the unicorn" is her referring to herself as "the alicorn." You don't refer to yourself in your own thoughts as "the person," do you? It doesn't make any more sense for Twilight to do the same. This is why Lavender Unicorn Syndrome rarely works with a limited narrator. It only makes sense when the reference defines a relationship with the perspective character or when the character being described is someone the perspective character doesn't know.

>“Pinkie Pie cornered me this morning, believe me I tried to run but escaping that mare is impossible.” Starlight said//

Punctuation. Actually in several places. That period should be a comma, and this piece of dialogue is missing a comma where it needs one, and the existing comma is a splice.

>wincing at the recollection of the pink mare’s seemingly impossible knowledge of where she would teleport to//

Now remember you started the story in Twilight's perspective. You had the narrator expressing Twilight's opinions and impressions. This is not something she can know, unless she's reading Starlight's mind. Twilight might conclude this is what Starlight is thinking, but show me the chain of evidence leading her there. If you just state it as a fact, mind reading is the only explanation. In reality, what you've done is shift into Starlight's perspective, but really consider if it's necessary. Does the reader need to know this? If so, is saying it from Starlight's perspective the only way to get the information out there? And then, should you have just been in Starlight's perspective from the start? You don't want to jump around from head to head too much, or it just gets jarring, having to constantly re-evaluate whose train of thought the narration is supposed to represent.

>Entwining two souls is not something that should be undertaken lightly, the consequences could be disastrous!//

Comma splice.

>Pinkie is a stalker in the making//

Needs a comma after this to separate clauses.

At this point, I'll say the conversation has a "talking heads" feel. There's little narration, and plenty of paragraphs are going by that either have no narration or the only narration is a speech tag. When you have a real conversation, you're not typically hyper-focused on the speech only. There's scenery around, people do things, and there's body language and facial expressions that communicate just as much as the words do. Don't skimp on all that.

>Starlight seemed unimpressed and/or disturbed by the thought.//

Give me the evidence. But I do like that you're framing this as Twilight's perception of what Starlight's thoughts must be instead of stating factually what they are. This is what I was talking about above, keeping things grounded in Twilight's perspective.

>the Princess gave her former student a stern look//

Again having Twilight making an oddly external reference to herself, and again punctuating/capitalizing a non-speaking action as if it's a speech tag. Plus you've already mentioned she was Twilight's former student. At least this descriptor works with the perspective, since it uses Twilight's relationship to Starlight, but this is another danger of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome: it repeatedly tells the reader information he already knows.

>sauntered on out//

You have a number of places like this where you string several extraneous adverbs together. If you dropped the "on," what would you really be losing?

>Starlight looked gloomy//

Who's making this judgment? Twilight's left the room. Starlight can't see herself to make this evaluation of her appearance.

>Ooooohhh~//

Please don't use tildes like that. Just describe how she says it.

>Boulder woulder//

Both words would be capitalized, since the whole thing is a nickname.

>Pinkie looked towards her pet alligator, and gave him a disapproving frown.//

That's all one clause (each verb doesn't get its own subject), so you don't need the comma.

>emotionlessly//

And whose opinion is this? Odd for it to be Maud's, but Pinkie wasn't there at the beginning of the scene, so she shouldn't be holding the perspective. If you want the narrator expressing his own opinions independent of the characters, that can work in a comedy, but then you need to remove spots like that second paragraph where he's clearly relating Twilight's thoughts as if his own, in order to make it more of an omniscient narration.

>emotionlessly//

>quizzically//
>flatly//
Adverbs that communicate mood are a bad idea to overuse anyway, but you keep using them in a repetitive manner. Look how close together these are and how they're all tacked onto a speaking action. Really try to get a handle on these -ly adverbs. They're fine if they change the way something is perceived (quickly, softly, etc.), but when they convey a mood or emotion, they should be used sparingly.

>What plans do you normally have for world domination, anyway? Gummy asked.//

Yeah, I think you'd do better to try casting this as an omniscient narration. Having a narrator who does supply opinions and impressions more readily works with comedy than with most other genres, and there are very few places you do so where the narration really takes on one of the characters' voices, so it'd be far easier to clean up those couple of spots and have it this way, since it's what most of the story is doing anyway. Then a lot of the Lavender Unicorn descriptors are fair game, as long as you don't keep using the same ones and don't overuse them in general.

>Who needed to walk normally anyway? Maud apparently//

Here's one of those spots where the narration takes on too personal a voice to work as a comedic limited narrator.

>Pinkie Pie stated the obvious as if it was a seldom known truth.//

That's uncomfortably close to explaining the joke, and if you have to explain a joke, it isn't a joke.

>cloudsdale//

Capitalization.

>Now I have even more family, wait until I tell our second cousin twice removed!//

You have a lot of these comma splices. Sometimes they work in dialogue, but they're like seasoning: a little goes a long way. Use them to emphasize that someone's rushed, bewildered, or some such. If you use them everywhere, they lose their punch.

>seemed//

You use some form of "seem" an awful lot. For one thing, it's going to tie the impression too closely to a particular character's voice, and for another, it makes the writing less crisp when you keep using these vagaries. Tell me what things are, not kinda maybe like they might be.

>Plot convenience, silly//

Unless the story's going to make some meta point about the show or fanfiction or authors or something, meta humor is just going to feel misplaced, and it's not the kind of humor that retains its impact on reread.

>followed after//

The "after" is redundant.

>a ornate//

Typo.

>each signifying their intended usage as necklaces//

You'll normally set off absolute phrases with a comma.

>Pinkie complemented the oblivious Starlight//

Unless you're saying Pinkie goes well with Starlight, you want "complimented."

>Arcanium-rich Magimysticite//

I supposed you're making a shout-out there? The thing is, canon has used real mineralogy every time, so it rings false when you start making things up.

>something seemed to pass//

You're really using "seem" too much, and if you do want an omniscient narrator, they shouldn't be using it to describe their own impressions at all, since it's directly contradictory to the concept of being omniscient.

>Maud state//

Typo.

>What’s going-//

Use a dash.

>We need to catch her before Twilight notices!//

Now you're pretty much just reinventing the dilemma of Trixie finding the cutie map table before Twilight returned.

>Where is the ice cream flavored rocks//

you're mixing singular and plural there: is... rocks.

>The stallion looked at Pinkie before turning and galloping back into his house, slamming and locking the door behind him.//

Why would he do that? Everyone's used to Pinkie acting like that, and the townsfolk in general don't know Maud, so this isn't exactly unprecedented behavior to them.

>he’s magnesium rich basalt, and this is just marble so it’s Okay//

I don't know why you capitalized "okay." And I don't see how this circumvents cannibalism. It's like saying a Kazakh eating a Honduran isn't cannibalism, since they're different kinds of people.

>“ENOUGH!” Starlight raged, having had enough.//

Redundant. Or the kind of humor I'd expect to see in a random trollfic, if it was intentional.

>Twilight-//

Use a dash.

>You’ll be fine silly//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>sad horse noises//

I don't even know what these would be. What does a real horse sound like when it's sad? I doubt many readers know. Horses upset in that way just usually keep quiet.

>gummy//

Capitalization.

>prods fondles//

Missing comma.

>like it were the whoooole world//

Verb form is off, and that's not the kind of error I'd see Maud or Pinkie making.

>I have a deeper understanding you now//

Missing word.

>with your spiritually//

Typo.

This was a great premise, but you really gloss over any sort of point to the story. Starlight getting her comeuppance, yeah, but it's not done differently than many other stories or even several episodes of the show. The real draw here is what Pinkie and Maud learn from the experience, but we don't get any impressions or character growth resulting from either one, just a single line of dialogue that they appreciate each other better now. That should be the high point of the story, where you really examine the emotional impact on all involved, not just left to a few sentences and then forgotten as we go to a routine denouement for Starlight. Aside from needing to make more of a point (why does it matter than any of these events happened, either in how a conflict was resolved or in how any of the characters have changed?), you also need some unity to how the narrative voice is used. You're closest to an omniscient narrator who can still sound conversational, so it would be easiest to remove the few traces of the narrator sounding like it's one of the characters. Then a few editing things, and while I'm not a fan of the meta humor, it's not the kind of thing I'd require you to change.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2784

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>don't you Sachet//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>siamese//

Capitalize.

>Her face colored and I would have wagered that she looked down behind her sunglasses.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Fluttershy gasped theatrically//

Doesn't that imply it's insincere?

>She glanced at me as we stopped at the corner, looking across Fifth as wagons and buses rolled on by.//

It's fairly clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence, plus it confuses things by over-specifying the chronology.

>looked horrified//

And how does it look? As a conclusion, it's just a cold fact, but if I get to see what makes her look that way, it's a lot more real.

>"Sachet!"//

If the whole quote is italicized, it doesn't matter whether you include the quotation marks in the italics, but don't have one of them italicized and the other not.

>smiling with a tinge of embarrassment//

How does he conclude she's embarrassed? He doesn't know it as a fact, so he's making a judgment call based on how she looks and acts, so let me see that same evidence and draw my own conclusion.

>I paced her//

That's a fairly unusual verb, so it really stands out that I've already seen it 3 or 4 times.

>Unlike when I did magic//

But... what he's describing is doing magic. He even says so. He's contradicting himself.

>I though only Princess Celestia could teleport//

Typo.

>Prance//

You're inconsistent about italicizing that.

>See that compass on my hinny?//

You sure you didn't mean "hiney"? Maybe this is just a regionalism I've never heard, but as far as I know, a hinny is a donkey/horse hybrid.

>modeling?//

You've been getting this right, so it must be an oversight here. When you have a word italicized for emphasis, include a question mark or exclamation mark on it in the italics.

>saying "Um/

Missing comma.

>sent Rarity and I//

This is actually a spot for "me." "Rarity and I" is the same thing as "we." "Rarity and me" is the same thing as "us." What sounds more correct, "sent we" or "sent us"?

>visibly calming herself//

If it's visible, then shouldn't I get to see it, too?

>The yellow pegasus was reminding me of my lost friend and it was all sorts of disconcerting.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, and since he knows her name now, why is he making such an external reference as "the yellow pegasus"? You don't think about your friends with descriptors like this, do you?

>tail in the air//

Set off the absolute phrase with a comma.

>a Staff Sergeant//

In that usage, there's no reason to capitalize the rank.

>defused//

diffused

>otherhoof//

The human equivalent "on the other hand" doesn't have that as a single word, so why would this?

>Sangre jumped on the stage and Telephoto rounded on her.//

Needs a comma.

>as I trotted over to her as she landed//

Really clunky having those stacked-up "as" clauses again.

>Just talk to me about anything you want to know and I'll translate from photographer to normal pony speak.//

Needs a comma.

>returned from the hell we experienced together. By the time I returned//

Watch that close word repetition.

>all together//

In this sense, "altogether."

>wondering wistfully whether I could be more than just a friend//

I get that this is only a fleeting thought on his part, but for one thing, it comes out of nowhere, and for another, it really sets him up for one of the big Gary Stu criteria, which is that romance with one of the main characters is suggested, especially without building up to it. They've only just met. His incredibly unique and powerful talent doesn't help. I don't even see how it's necessary for this story. The one time travel incident, sure, but that wasn't the only way to get her to her appointment on time, and even if that's critical to the other story, it makes this one a questionable point of entry to the series.

>I found my special talent trying to find my father when Celestia refused to believe he wasn't involved in an aborted attack on the stadium in Fillydelphia and the destruction of the adjacent bridge.//

All this is really muddying the waters. It's pretty much irrelevant to this story, at least the details of it, and while I realize that connects to your other story, it doesn't help this one stand alone. It makes it feel like there's a lot more you aren't telling, and it bogs down this story with details that ultimately don't matter.

>that seemed to have magically appeared over my hoof//

It's weird to say this now after it's already been there awhile.

>Her plan failed; Twilight forgave her for her mistakes; she's since then become quite a hero in her own right—a savior of worlds.//

It's pretty clunky to have multiple semicolons in a single sentence, unless they're part of a list. This really doesn't sound like Fluttershy's speech, either.

>protégé//

Sunset is female, so she's a protégée.

>Change— Um//

Don't leave a space after an em dash.

>ten minute break//

ten-minute

>By the end of the shoot, I felt emotionally drained, limp like a ragdoll, but practically vibrated anyway.//

You never say anything to justify this, though. What's been so stressful for him? Just worrying that she'd make him talk about Sunset again? Then give a couple of little hints, or it's just vague.

>There was a real wind now and the traffic was loud.//

Needs a comma.

>She looked me in the eye as said, "but//

Missing word, capitalization.

>I predicated a lot of decisions in my life on her, going against what would make me most happy just to get away from everything tied up in that morass.//

This sounds more like a prepared speech. It's nothing like off-the-cuff dialogue. Would you really talk like this?

>eye opening//

Hyphenate.

>I'll talk to Twilight if I have to because she's better about such things.//

Needs a comma. This is a strange thought, though. Twilight's going to force Sangre to publish something? What would be her motivation for doing so? At least he already said it's something ponies deserve to know, but Fluttershy gives no reason of her own for wanting to spread the word, and if Celestia hasn't done so herself, i don't know why she'd presume to, and then she's so certain Twilight will feel the same way.

>help— Oh!//

Don't leave a space after the em dash.

>Something tells me that something very special is going to happen when you talk to Sunset Shimmer again.//

This carries zero impetus. The cutie map missions are about overcoming some struggle to make something happen. She didn't struggle for anything here. She stumbled into the answer, and she didn't have to convince him of anything. Just mention casually that Sunset is still alive, and the solution dropped into her lap. You're really stretching to make this into a big moment, and it's just not working. Him finding out Sunset is still alive should suffice. Let that speak on its own. You don't have to over-dramatize this to make it powerful. Less is often more. I'll discuss that a little further at the end, because it's very relevant to the story as a whole.

>by-lines//

That's not a hyphenated word.

>oblivious of their good deeds//

Set off the absolute phrase with a comma.

>Brandywine.//

Don't put a period after the closing of a letter.

I don't get why he's not writing for Prance anymore. Because he feels like there are more important things to write? Why can't he do both? One's already a steady job for him, and he doesn't have a reason to believe the other will be, except for Fluttershy engaging in some really out-of-character cronyism. He's pretty vague about it. I can't believe it's because he thinks rekindling his friendship with Sunset won't leave him enough time.

Wow, that's really off-putting that you don't mention his name until the end. I guess that's supposed to be some dramatic reveal when tied in with your other story? I haven't read it, so it means nothing to me. It's another way this story doesn't stand alone well. The information is withheld from me as if it's significant, and when I finally find out his name, it's inconsequential.

Fluttershy's voicing seems a little off. You do say that this is some time in the future, well after her first foray into modeling, so she may have changed some, but that's never addressed. If Brandywine had noted, for example, that she acted much more confidently and assertively than he would have expected, given what portrayal she'd had in canon to that point, and maybe speculated that she'd grown through her many successes as an Element, it'd be a less jarring a take on her, since it'd directly address and explain the difference.

Initially, I very much liked this story. It was a nice tale about someone with some inner turmoil being pressed into an encounter with just the right pony to help him. He's reluctant to talk about it, but she's very patient with him and eventually draws him out to confide in her. She's easing back into modeling in order to make Rarity happy, but in a way that's more agreeable to her and that Rarity probably would not approve of, but Rarity's not there to object. So far, so good.

Then we get to his special power and his back story. Not so good.

Keep in mind that if this story were to get a solo feature, we have to treat it as if the reader will come into it with no prior knowledge except for a general awareness of the TV episodes. And that's exactly what I have.

In general, that first impression I had is of a very workable story. It's when the specifics get fleshed out that it falls apart as a standalone entity. A lot of that has to do with your OC character. To illustrate, there's a concept we call "piling on." It's where you add as much tragic circumstance to a situation as you can, which very often ends up making the emotional engagement much less, since it has severely diminished authenticity and believability.

For an example, it's common to write stories about Scootaloo as an orphan. It becomes maudlin when authors continue to add tragedy by making it that both her parents died in separate but equally improbable accidents, there were no other relatives to care for her, and instead of living in an orphanage, she has to fend for herself in the streets. It just gets to be ridiculous, and the character is so far departed from a realistic situation that it's hard to relate to her.

As we start, there's this OC writer. Then we learn he has an ability that not even alicorns have; not only can he teleport to any place he can envision, but at any time, too. That's overpowered. Then we learn his mother was a terrorist leader who tried to kill Brandywine and is now such an elite villain that she's been banished to Tartarus. His father has been falsely accused of complicity and banished twice, but Brandywine managed to break him out at least once, which, according to canon, is exceedingly rare, as Tirek is the only known escapee. Upon meeting Fluttershy for the first time, he immediately speculates on a relationship with her. He discounts it just as quickly, but bringing it up in the first place has done the damage. And then main cast member and fan favorite Sunset Shimmer is not only his subordinate, but is his best friend and is infatuated with him as well.

That's a lot to swallow.

It's quite possible to build all that up in context, but to the uninitiated reader, which we have to assume everyone is, it's difficult to take him as anything but a Gary Stu. With all that I said about "piling on," it's quite possible to tell this story without all the grandiose back story. While it's also quite possible all that is required by the main story of the series, none of that is apparent here.

So while I found the premise interesting, the characterization good, and the writing solid, enough of the details contribute to it not standing alone well so that I can't recommend it for posting. I also can't see you wanting to change those details. That leaves the best course of action as submitting "Sunset Shimmer Goes to Hell," presuming that it provides that context in a reasonable way, and then adding this one as a sequel to it in a story updates post.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2785

>Relax Starlight, I -//
Needs a comma for direct address and a proper dash.

>It’s…fine//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it begins a sentence or has other punctuation right after it.

>hoping the slight shakiness to her apologetic smile wouldn’t give away that yes, she had in fact been thinking of such things//

I marked this last time. It comes across as really condescending to your readers when you feel compelled to spell out your character's reasoning or motivation. There are far subtler ways of getting the same impression. Something like "She smiled quickly—no need to let Starlight know that was actually the case." That way the hope is carried in how it's expressed, and you don't have to say it outright. Give your readers some credit. If you give the right clues, they can figure things out.

>but before Trixie could respond with yet another burst of defensive statements/

Set off this dependent clause with a comma.

>It’s alright Trixie.//

Missing another comma for direct address. I only pointed out a couple of these last time, since it should be pretty self-explanatory how to fix the rest, once you've seen how to fix one. There are a lot of these I didn't mark. I was leaving it up to you to scan the story for them.

>that Trixie oh so loved to see//

That's pretty unsubtle, too. If you describe it as a "wonderful" smile, for example, it implies Trixie loves to see it, and it doesn't beat the reader over the head.

>overly leaky faucet that just wouldn't stop dripping//

Redundant.

>if they kept up the lesson//

Needs a comma after this to separate the clauses.

Here's another problem I pointed out last time that you don't seem to have done anything about. I'll list all your speech tags for the first scene, along with the words that immediately follow.
>Trixie said, slightly biting//
>Starlight said, her brow furrowed//
>she said, hoping//
>Starlight said, offering//
>Trixie said, glancing//
>Trixie said, flashing//
>Starlight said, pausing//
>Starlight said, already heading//
>she said, glancing//
>Trixie said, once again smiling//
See how every single one of those has a participial phrase (-ing or -ed verb) tacked on? It gets incredibly repetitive. Most of the speech tags in your story are like this.

>Trixie,” she stood up and raised a hoof in the air as if making a formal announcement, ”shall//

That second set of quotes is backward for some reason. This is phrased like a narrative aside, so you need to use dashes, and don't put a comma at the end of the aside:
Trixie—” she stood up and raised a hoof in the air as if making a formal announcement ”—shall

>just a tad//

You use this same phrase in consecutive sentences, and as early in the story as it is, you'd even used it more times previously.

>but since they had become such close friends//

Needs a comma after this to separate clauses. This is another thing I picked out some examples of last time and left you to find the rest on your own, but you appear to have fixed only the specific ones I marked. Again, I'm not marking all of them.

>obviously seeing through her ruse//

Way too blunt again. It's like you don't trust your readers to figure any of this out. Something like "Well, she could never hide anything from her friend" gets the same thing across without saying it outright.

>Evening Mrs. Cake//

Another spot that needs a comma for direct address. I'm not going to mark any more of these either. There are lots of them. Please go through the whole story and fix them.

>a sarcastic “Fascinating,”//

You don't have to capitalize it when it's made generic, like by putting the "a" in front of the quote. I pointed this out last time.

>Oh, yes, any good magician needs a disappearing act, and Starlight here says mastering teleportation would be the best way to go about it.//

Isn't it one of the highest principles of illusionists never to explain how a trick is performed?

>Mrs. Cake gave the unicorns a smile.//

This is in Trixie's perspective. Why would she call herself and Starlight "the unicorns"? It's strange for her to think of herself in terms of her race.

>as she once again took on the air of confidence that came when she got into her showmare mood, standing up just a bit taller as she began to wave her foreleg with her words//

It's really clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in one sentence.

>alright - Trixie//

Please use proper dashes for asides and interruptions. This is something else I'm not going to mark every instance of. Please go through your story looking for them. Hyphens are only for hyphenated words and stutters.

>You two feel free to take seat.//

Missing word. I pointed this out last time, too.

>to pre-emptively pay for tip//

Missing word.

>Sugar Cube//

Per canon, that's one word.

>egoness//

egotism

>But, at least there was coffee soaked chocolate cake to enjoy//

No reason to have that comma, and in this situation it's "coffee-soaked."

>you two. It seems she still hasn’t quite gotten control over her baby magic yet. Let me just go get you two//

You still have quite a few places where you repeat a word or phrase close together like this.

>yay….//

One too many dots.

>the two unicorn mares//

Again, really strange for Trixie to describe herself in such external and impersonal terms.

>on your head."//

Note how most of the story uses fancy-style quotation marks, but you have simple ones here. They need to be consistent. You should check through the whole story for this. I see other spots. Same goes for apostrophes, as you're also inconsistent at those. This usually results from writing most of the story in something like GDocs, which uses smart quotes, and editing directly on FiMFiction, which doesn't.

>“I guess…” she glanced outside//

The capitalization says this is a speech tag, but it has no speaking action.

>you’re….not//

One too many dots.

>how do you except me to believe//

Typo.

>your..foalishness//

One too few dots this time.

>the only one’s throwing a tantrum//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>that – “//

Backward quotation marks.

>“ I am a great illusionist//

Extraneous space after the quotation marks.

>I found way to do my act//

Missing word.

>You’ve honestly haven’t//

Syntax is off.

>Part of her wanted to say yes, she was absolutely perfect so of course she hadn’t changed at all.//

Comma splice.

>all the teacher’s she had ever had//

Using a possessive where you need a plural.

>gentle smile on her face as she gently//

Just one more example of close word repetition.

>touchy-feeling//

Usually phrased as "touchy-feely."

>mistakes-“//

Another spot that needs a dash, and the quotation marks are backward.

>Trixie...,//

Don't put a comma after an ellipsis.

>this was the kind of moments//

Mixing plural/singular.

Seems like you did a better job of adding some consequence to the story, but it still needs a fair amount of mechanical cleanup. If you can manage that, then I could see posting it. Just please keep in mind that for all the recurring things, I'm only marking a couple of examples. There are a lot more than those in the story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2794

>which was good since Rarity hadn't once paused with telling her story//
Yet the story intro doesn't create this feel. You go through mundane things like who's there and where they're sitting, then oh by the way, Rarity was talking the whole time. Bring that in from the start.

>Rarity cast her gaze skyward for several aggravating seconds.//

I'm having trouble identifying the perspective. This is the narrator getting aggravated, so you must be using a limited narration, but I'm not sure whose viewpoint he represents. The opening paragraph was so bland that it didn't take on a personal voice, but here, you do. You need to tweak things so the perspective is consistent. It's good practice to keep it the same for an entire scene, unless there's a compelling reason to shift it, and even then, it shouldn't change too often or abruptly.

>wonder...well//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence or is immediately followed by more punctuation.

>the pegasus//

The only time so far you seemed to have adopted a perspective, it was Rainbow Dash's, yet if she still holds it, this means she'd choose to refer to herself as "the pegasus," which is weird. Plus she's not the only pegasus there.

>new?//

When a word is italicized for emphasis, it's preferred that exclamation marks or question marks on it be included in the italics.

>she pointed at Applejack, who wore a similar smile,//

Don't put a comma at the end of an aside like this.

>It was almost disturbing//

And the perspective has gone vague again. I have no idea who finds this disturbing.

Compare that to the first chapter, where your narrator really does take on Applejack's voice well. The perspective in the prologue is pretty unidentifiable.

>Her brother nodded//

The last female character mentioned is Granny Smith, so the "her" would seem to refer to her.

>celler//

I can't tell whether you're writing the accent here, but really, if you spelled it right, how would it be pronounced any differently?

>"But it ain't fair!" she protested.//

Again, it's kind of vague who "she" is, since Granny spoke the previous quote.

>Ayh//

What in the world is this? I don't know how it'd sound different from the "Ah" you've been using.

>began to trot back up the path to their home. She scowled some more, then started//

"Begin" and "start" actions should be used sparingly anyway, so it's a bit much to get two so close together. It's self-explanatory that any action begins, so it's only worth pointing it out when that beginning is significant in some way, like it's abrupt or the action never finishes.

>It just titled to one corner and rested there.//

Typo.

>Applejack finished catching up.//

That's kind of a strange phrasing. Why not just say she caught up?

One thing that could stand to be tuned up is the abundance of "to be" verbs. They're everywhere. They tend to stagnate a story, since nothing happens. It's usually not hard to phrase things with an active verb, and it makes things much more interesting to read. Of the forms that are easy to search for, I count 50, which is pushing it for a chapter this short. That's a little less frequent than once every other sentence, so that's how often something doesn't happen. You get somewhat of a pass for dialogue, but the paragraph starting with "Applejack wasn't sure how it was possible" is particularly awash in them. It's not a requirement to keep these to a minimum, but it does help your story flow better.

>back into his saddlebags//

>back inside the wagon//
Kind of repetitive phrasing in consecutive sentences.

>Applejack later learned that the seeds they were buying were bred to do well in the late-season harvest.//

This is a weird choice, since it pulls the story out of being shown "live." It's a narrative summary after the fact, but shouldn't that return them to their discussion around the table? That'd seem the place to give a denouement like this.

>She never got to enjoy it, though.//

Never got to enjoy what? The storm? She's never expressed an affinity for them. The apples? It'd be a long time before they sprouted, so she'd have to be grounded a very long time for that. And why was she grounded anyway? Granny Smith never seemed to be getting mad at her, and she never gave any warnings. Applejack's limited narration never expressed that she was pushing things. So it just comes out of nowhere that there was a punishable offense committed in the first place.

I'm not sure I understand the point of this story. There's no punchline, and Applejack doesn't illustrate a life lesson from it. She just tells about a time they helped someone fix a wagon wheel. I don't get why the girls would enjoy listening to it. It just doesn't go anywhere.

And as I start the second story, I find it really odd that you don't return to the framing device of the girls listening to Rarity and Applejack. It makes it feel like Rarity immediately starts into her story without anyone discussing or remarking on Applejack's, and that only heightens the sense that the first one had no point, since the girls aren't getting anything out of it. At least you do cut in later, but I don't understand why you wouldn't between stories.

I don't understand how Rarity didn't already know about all this damage to her home. Did she buy the place sight unseen?

>gruffy stallion//

I don't think "gruffy" is a word. Are you sure you don't mean "gruff"?

>her parent's house//

She only has one parent?

>("Told ya.")//

Like the handling of the framing device, this is causing me some cognitive dissonance. You're in a scene that's showing me events as a flashback, yet you're still letting the present cut in. But the flashback scenes are being told more like a narrative summary that as if they're actually happening now, so it's less engaging. This almost reads more like a diary entry in that regard.

>business!//

Italicize the exclamation mark as well.

>It took her all of two seasons//

As in six months? That's not very long to repay a business loan. She's very fortunate.

The second story does right what the first story did wrong and vice versa. Rarity's actually making a point, and a nice one at that, whereas Applejack's story was pointless. On the other hand, Applejack's story felt a lot more in the moment, as we see it play out "live," with the action and dialogue going on as if in the present, while in Rarity's story, most of the action is delivered via narrative summary, so it comes across like reading a newspaper account of it, not like I'm witnessing it. If you combined Applejack's in-the-moment feel with Rarity's having a message to relate, you'd be on to something.

>He didn't want to walk in with soaking hair again//

This seems to be from Big Mac's perspective, which is strange, since Applejack's the one telling the story.

>Big Mac!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>good mornin', sis//

When used as a term of address, family relations get capitalized.

>They told her what the plan was supposed to be.//

And you're lapsing into narrative summary again. Show me these things happening. Don't just assure me they did. I'm really not engaged with Applejack and how she's feeling so emotional about watching her siblings together. It's supposed to be a departure from the routine, but when it's the only instance I get to see, it doesn't feel out of the ordinary. You need the reader experiencing it the way Applejack does so they'll feel the same way.

Nice touch with the repetition of "don't make this a routine," and I like the way Granny Smith has the only flawless dish, yet she sleeps through it. This one makes a nice point as well, so I guess the first story was just an aberration? It sticks out when you're leading off with a weak one, though.

>"Broke?" Rainbow Dash asked. "You seriously went broke for a while?"//

Yeah, see, shy would Dash wait to ask this until after Applejack had told another story? You need to use the framing device more consistent with how they'd actually have their conversation.

Nice touch with Apple Bloom getting her first bow from Rarity.

>She didn't say anything, she simply nodded to her friends and took her seat again.//

Comma splice.

This is a really cute idea for a story. It just loses something in the execution, where Rarity's story and part of Applejack's second one feel glossed over, plus the framing device didn't pop up in any of the places it should have. Fortunately, those shouldn't be a big deal to address, as there's not a ton written yet. I'd recommend letting the frame story poke it between each story, either at the end of one chapter or the beginning of the next (or both) and keep the narrative summarizing to events that don't build up the emotional investment in specific ways. Plus the first story really needs a point to it. I'd say you found a nice balance in the first story as to what events to show "live" and what to summarize, while the next two did a better job of having a point.

I'd love to see this fixed up so I can post it. It's a delightful little series of slice-of-life moments with just enough of a message to each to keep it from being fluff. I'm interested to see where else you go with it!

Ion-SturmCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2803

File: 1496375907346.gif (492.38 KB, 500x213, bLwyvYq[1].gif)

Still going at it, eh? Tenacious, moreso than I am (or was, possibly ever will be). But I digress, I just wanted to say that what you're doing is worthy of commendation. Many of these exhaustive lists don't seem to get a reply, and those that do rarely move into a proper conversation (although that is from a rather quick skim of just the last fifty posts).

Getting a 'Thank-you' from someone who you've helped is nice, but one from a person who just sees you doing your job? Ah, now that is a fine thing indeed. So, thank you, for helping these people find their words. And thank you for keeping some of that old /fic/ spirit alive.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2805

>>2803
I appreciate your appreciation. There are a fair number of these stories that do get resubmitted, and the authors will ask questions through email or just revise on their own. So I do get more responses/resubmissions than are apparent here, but still on far less than half of them.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2806

>It had been almost a year now she had been living in this castle and it had taken at least eight months before she finally felt confident she understood its design and the locations of each room.//
The wording of the first part doesn't quite work, and the last part means that each room has multiple locations. Maybe that one's intentional. Needs a comma between the clauses, too.

>who to send//

whom

This first chapter is rather ungainly. It goes through nothing but exposition, where it could have gotten at the same information by showing me some quick scenes of the events in question, and then it's more gradual and pertinent than having to settle in for a history lesson. Narrative exposition just isn't a terribly engaging thing to do in large amounts, particularly not at the beginning, where you're trying to grab the reader's interest.

>But, there was nothing.//

There's rarely a reason to put a comma after a conjunction. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>Her friend’s cutie marks//

She has more than one friend, right?

>And hope that that wasn’t some horrible evil out there that would try and kill her.//

While "that that" can be a valid grammatical structure, I don't think it's what you wanted here.

>was…odd//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence or has other punctuation right after it.

>sans the Cutie Map itself//

Why isn't the map also a little to the left?

>relief palpable across her face//

There ar an awful lot of times you directly say how a character feels instead of demonstrating it. Twilight's an exception, since as the limited narration, how the narration words things and the conversational style it takes can also convey her mood. But for other characters, spend more time focusing on the evidence of their emotions instead of just identifying them.

>the pegasus’s neck//

It can be ungainly to use this type of reference anyway, but you have to be particularly careful using them in a limited narration. Keep in mind that this narration is basically Twilight's stream of thought, so you're saying that she'd choose to refer to her very good friend Fluttershy as "the pegasus." You don't think about your friends in such abstract and external ways, do you?

>She knew they weren’t laughing at her. Not like that.//

Now you seem to have shifted into Fluttershy's perspective, but you don't stay there. It's not a good idea to shift around limited perspective suddenly or frequently.

>‘till//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want an opening single quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. But the apostrophe isn't even necessary for this spelling. The accepted variations are til, 'til, and till.

>There was fear evident in her voice//

I think I can avoid a longer explanation by simply posing this question, considering that this is Twilight's limited narration: do you have to listen to your own voice to know how you feel?

>The mare in question//

Again, a very external reference for someone Twilight knows well. In your own thoughts, you don't refer to your grandfather as "the gray-haired man," do you?

>nearly running into it, as it was still slightly out of position//

Well there you go. Except the "still" suggests she noted this before, yet the story didn't mention it.

>just somewhat to the left of where she had intended it to appear//

Actually, this brings up a question. Is Twilight central to this universe? To her, "left" depends on which way she's facing, so not some sort of global "north." If everything's always to her left, then it's not that way for everyone else. There's actually quite a bit of comic absurdity inherent in that, and it would do you well to use it.

>Until then, he figured that it was just Twilight being Twilight//

Without Twilight hedging a bit, like saying that he appeared to be thinking this, it breaks the perspective, as it's either transferred over to Spike's viewpoint or Twilight's reading his mind.

>Besides, there were a couple of comic books upstairs in his room that were calling his name. And who was he to deny them?//

Yeah, you've definitely switched to Spike's perspective. You can get away with this more in comedies, since a close emotional attachment to the viewpoint character often isn't as crucial, but you're really pushing it. Plus the transitions between perspectives are abrupt.

>It was time to try and feel out what Spike and her’s relationship was in this world//

Yeah, you need to smooth out these perspctive shifts or just confine it all to one perspective. This is a jarring transfer from Spike's head, and we didn't even get any important information that Twilight couldn't have reasoned her way to while there.

>without being arousing//

Wording is off.

>Spike knew her better than anypony else//

But Spike isn't a pony...

>unsure exactly where she was going with this//

There's a short discussion on "head hopping" at the top of this thread that might shed some light on why your constantly shifting perspective isn't a good thing.

>But he didn’t seem to notice her confusion, as he was glowering, irritated at her for how he thought she was going about this whole thing.//

And now you're inhabiting two perspectives in the same sentence.

>Spike grit his teeth//

The past tense is "gritted."

>See, Spike had never fully forgiven Starlight for what she had tried to do//

This really sounds like the narrator is talking to the reader.

>mmph!

When a word is italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>But let’s not get into that//

If you're going to have the kind of narrator who speaks to the reader, you need to establish that from the start and use it consistently, and it also doesn't blend well with the limited narration representing Twilight's (and occasionally other characters') viewpoints. It implies that this is Twilight addressing the audience, and that means she's aware she has an audience, which you haven't established, either in a meta sense or that she's explicitly telling someone the story.

>who I could trust//

whom

>as seen above//

Yeah, you really shouldn't wait until near the end of the second chapter to introduce fourth-wall breaking.

>“Nope. No plan here.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>somedragon/

Why's she using this now when she included him in "anypony" twice earlier?

>Nothing much seemed to be different. In fact, it all seemed to be exactly the same.//

"Nothing much" isn't the same as "nothing." These two sentences are pretty contradictory.

>famous celebrities//

Aren't celebrities inherently famous? You don't need to say so.

>of which they were intimately familiar with//

You have redundant prepositions. It's just "with which they were intimately familiar."

>Wrap-Up//

The official episode title doesn't use a hyphen.

>Grand-Galloping Gala//

And that doesn't have a hyphen, either.

Why are you spending a significant chunk of chapter 3 recapping the entire show?

>She continued on, ignoring his comment.//

But she didn't ignore it. The whole last paragraph was a train of thought it led to.

>Shining’s and Cadance’s pregnancy//

When you use separate possessives, it means they separately own the thing. These two own it jointly, so only put it on Cadence.

>hoping to alleviate her stress some//

It's not a good idea to spell out motives like this. Let his actions and behavior speak for him.

>It never even registered that that was, in fact, the difference here. Something so simple was completely overlooked.//

Here's a fundamental problem with the kind of narration you've chosen. The narrator basically is one of the characters, so he can't know what the character doesn't. Yet here, the narrator representing Twilight explicitly says he knows something she doesn't. It's contradictory.

>‘A Wholly Comprehensive and Detailed History of the World’//

Titles don't take both italics and quotes. As a book, this one just needs italics.

Twilight's sure holding the idiot ball here. There's only so far you can stretch that, and I fear it's going to take up the whole chapter.

>There was quite a lot of things in her books//

Number mismatch: was... things.

>S’alright//

That apostrophe isn't where the skipped letters are.

>Sorry!//

Include the exclamation mark in the italics.

>comedic interruption//

If you have to tell the reader that something is funny, chances are that it isn't.

>his face a cross between worry and irritation//

Show me the evidence of it. Just naming emotions doesn't paint a vivid picture.

>pith hat//

The proper name is a pith helmet.

This makes me wonder if there are multiple Discords or if by his nature he inhabits the entire multiverse.
>Maybe her Discord wouldn’t know she agreed to do so.//
Well, I guess that answers that question.

>–quizzing//

The way you have this punctuated doesn't make sense.

Alright, at least you depart from her obliviousness for a good joke about her having a contingency plan to overthrow Equestria.

>Rest assured, Spike//

She uses direct address with him an awful lot. Think about how often you do when you're having a one-on-one conversation.

>apple or cake-related disasters//

You presumably meant the "related" to apply to the "apple" as well, so stick a hyphen on the "apple" as well.

What's with all these one-sentence paragraphs? They're for emphasis, and when everything is emphasized, effectively nothing is.

>Though, little did she know, that the timelines had never diverged because they had never been one, singular stream in the first place.//

Again, you're having the limited narrator in Twilight's perspective saying things Twilight explicitly doesn't know.

>His deflated some.//

His what?

>been—” Her eyes found the clock, tick tocking from up on the wall. “—almost//

When you put a narrative aside in a quote, it doesn't get capitalized or take end punctuation (except possibly for a question mark or exclamation mark where appropriate).

>“Sure, Twi. Whatever you say."//

Notice your mixed quotation mark styles here. You ought to make them consistent throughout. The fancy ones usually come from MS Word or GDocs, and the simple ones from editing directly on FiMFiction. The same goes for apostrophes.

>but the slight differences in where others stood in relation to her home universe had unsettled her. As such, she wasn’t entirely sure why she felt so relieved to be back home.//

Actually, it sounds like she does understand. She stated it outright then said she doesn't know.

>She was incredibly curious as to what sort of Twilight had ended up here.//

But she met that Twilight. If she wanted to know so bad, why didn't she stop and talk?

>She, here referring to Other Twilight.//

That's less Twilight talking to herself and more the author talking to the reader.

>After everything, after all that time and effort, that was the difference?!//

It's kind of hard to take this as the story's climax when you've been telling me exactly this since the beginning.

>Twilight Sparkle had been transported to an alternate universe where everything was moved slightly to the right.//

I thought she went to one where everything was shifted left. Or have you switched which Twilight you're talking about?

>It looked as if she was about to say something more, but then didn’t.//

How does she know what she looks like she's about to do? She's not watching herself in a mirror.

>I’ll tell you later.//

It'd take her less than ten words to sum it up. I don't understand why she won't.

>lay down for a while//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight.

All these one-sentence paragraphs are getting really grating.

It's kind of weird that the cutie map can take her to the other universes. It only did in canon because Starlight was changing the past, so Twilight returned to see what changes that had made in the present. She's not doing anything to the past now. I guess I don't understand why you're using the map for this and not, say, the mirror, which does go to alternate universes.

>But, I do understand a little bit.//

There's rarely a good reason to put a comma after a conjunction. This one doesn't belong.

The idea here is funny, but it's basically one of those "joke is in the title" stories, and you stretch that joke over two full chapters after a very expository intro with Twilight strangely oblivious to the fact that she herself keeps saying things aren't in the right place.

The perspective jumps around a lot, shifting from Twilight to Spike on a whim, and often having Twilight's limited narration say things she doesn't know. The perspective and the mechanical things I noted would need to be addressed, but the story is also significantly longer than it needs to be. There's lots of filler, like the exposition-heavy first chapter, the summary of the show's six full seasons, and repeatedly having Twilight notice yet not notice that things are slightly moved relative to her expectations.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2807

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

This isn't the worst thing in the world, but note that your opening paragraph is kind of stagnant, which isn't the best way to hook a reader. This is because you have three "to be" verbs in only two sentences, plus the last of those is in a passive voice structure. The more you word things actively, the more engaging they will be. Take this one:
>Nobles were always where the most 'unusual' would originate from//
Try "The most 'unusual' would alwas originate from the nobles"
or if you really like the nobles heading the sentence, "Nobles had always provided the most 'unusual'"
It's not generally too hard to rephrase things with active verbs and structures.

>None of these had ever broken her composure or caused her to stop in her tracks, the last rays of an Equestrian sunset already bleeding from the walls and falling to shadows on the floor.//

I don't see the connection at all. What comes after the comma is an absolute phrase, which modifies the entire dependent clause it's attached to, usually, and serves to synchronize actions or place dependencies on them. So this is trying to say the last rays bleed in while some other action is occurring, but there is no other action, just some statement about her past tendencies. It doesn't make sense.

>dramatically//

Your narration tends to be in Celestia's perspective, but it's strange for her to see this as dramatic. There's no reason for her to, and it comes across more as you trying to convince the reader that it is.

>swathes//

This is the verb form. The noun is "swaths."

>the ageless goddess that was her new teacher//

This seems to be more from Twilight's perspective than Celestia's. Why'd you switch for just the one sentence?

>She regained her composure immediately, after all if this filly were to live in the castle//

The comma you have is a splice, and you need a comma at the end of this to separate the dependent clause.

>young - Twilight's//

Please use proper dashes for asides and interruptions.

>uncertain expression//

Keep your perspective in mind. You're having Celestia evaluate her own expression when she can't see it. Even so, seeing it wouldn't be what allowed her to know how she felt. In an example I use frequently, you don't need to look in a mirror to know you're happy.

>as kind as she appeared to help her little student see in the dark halls//

I can't figure out what you're trying to say.

>taking it upon herself to interrupt when it became clear the filly was struggling to explain herself.//

You're really over-explaining her motives. Let her actions and the tone of her narration speak for themselves. The reader can figure out a lot of this with the right clues.

>Everypony knows that nopony bothers the princess and here she had just requested that//

It's really not a good idea to keep jerking the perspective back and forth like this.

>Almost//

Almost what? I don't get why Twilight says this.

>Well, Twilight I//

Needs another comma. In the middle of a sentence, direct address gets commas on both sides.

>Celestia closed the door behind her carefully waiting with her lips pursued in a dark room until even the echo of her hoofsteps had all but left her mind, a single word taking up the mental space where the dying melody had been.//

That's such a busy sentence that it loses focus. Plus it needs a comma to set off the participial phrase, I'm not sure why the "in a dark room" even needs to be there, and if she's closing the door and pausing, there weren't hoofsteps to echo just then, so the timing sounds a little strange.

>possibly-true//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb.

>And with the knowledge of after all these years there would be no more tears to choke back lest those words be true//

Awkward phrasing. The "of" would do better as "that."

>shelves of bookshelves//

There are... shelves on shelves?

>Most of their value was not in their original content, the text written in them was not what was advanced.//

Comma splice. I'm not going to keep marking these, but note that I see others.

>her coat came in contact with one of the werelights, warming her white coat//

Watch the close repetition of word or phrases like this.

>She laid the book down on the table without a word and located a small wooden end table overshadowed by the many bookshelves that towered over it.//

It sounds strange to shift focus from one table to the other like this. It almost makes them sound like they're the same table. And all that business about the bookshelves towering over it is irrelevant.

>the sun princess//

It's strange for her to refer to herself in such an external manner in her own thoughts (which is essentially what a limited narration is).

>She stared at the holes that marked missing words in entire sentences.//

Awkward phrasing again. I'm not sure what "entire" does here. If the words are missing, then they aren't entire sentences, are they?

>T-Ten//

Unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>"Princess, if I'm not failing... how come you didn't tell me?"//

I'm lost. Didn't tell her what? She expected an update from the princess to confirm that she wasn't failing? I can't imagine why.

>thirteen year old filly//

thirteen-year-old filly

>no more than three bolts of fire maximum//

Redundant.

>There were nothing//

was

I don't know, I'm with Sunset here. We're never given anything to say the rules prevent her from hitting all three targets with a single blast.

>A small spark too light next to Sunset Shimmer//

I can't parse this.

>you are not here-" She swept a wing to indicate Canterlot Castle behind them. "-for the//

Please use proper dashes. And narrative asides in quotes like this don't get capitalized or take end punctuation (except possibly for exclamation marks or question marks as appropriate).

>it feels right!//

When you italicize words for emphasis, it's preferred to include exclamation marks and question marks attached to them in the italics.

It's hard to get invested in this disagreement between Sunset and Celestia when we're only seeing the culmination of it. There's a lot of history here, but it's hard to get that across in the moment. Some of it gets skipped, other parts show up as expository dialogue that has trouble sounding authentic.

>the sun goddess//

Another strangely external reference for Celestia to use for herself.

I'm not sure it's a good move for Celestia to issue an ultimatum to a strong-willed student. We'll see how that plays out, but it seems like a drastic step. It might feel more justified if we were privy to Celestia's earlier efforts with Sunset.

>Have you ever talked with Princess Cadance? I have seen the both of you talking at the past two Summer Sun Celebrations//

Why'd she ask the question when she immediately answered it herself? She didn't do it in a rhetorical manner.

>By dawn//

Missing a line break here.

>I do think you will reconsider the harsh words that you spoke to me//

They weren't actually that harsh. Sunset was obviously frustrated but she wasn't insulting or outright disrespectful. I'm still on Sunset's side.

>I know that you are a very smart young mare but the extent of focus you've devoted to your studying is unnatural. There is more to life than the mastery of magical arts and the solitary state you've withdrawn to since you arrived from Tall Tale is not acceptable.//

Another couple of sentences that need a comma between the clauses.

>Princess Celestia stood outside the same room that a young Twilight Sparkle would call her own.//

This is a strange thing to say in Celestia's perspective, since she wouldn't know this yet.

>lunch box sized//

Hyphenate.

>"Nu-uh," Twilight pouted, "The//

The use of commas here indicates the quote is one continuous sentence, so why are you capitalizing "the"?

>scary!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>was to inept at socializing//

Typo.

>Cadance nodded vigorously.//

Missing a line break.

>Cadance too, looked//

Same, and there's no reason to have a comma there.

>"Hi, Shiny! Hi Auntie!"//

Look at the inconsistent comma usage for direct address.

>her and Twilight had been playing on//

she and Twilight

>if she didn't know better she'd say that the princess looked a bit sad//

You started the scene in Cadence's perspective. Why'd you switch to Twilight? Or if that's where you want to be, why'd you start with Cadence? This is a very short chapter to necessitate a shift of perspective. And then you go over to Celestia's point of view.

>her subjects strolling in the distance, Cadance and Shining Armor among them//

You only vaguely mentioned something about Cadence leaving, so it came as a surprise to me to find her in the distance now.

>not knowing that they would meet again//

Once more, you're having the limited narrator say something the viewpoint character wouldn't know.

And the last chapter has one of the things I hate most to see in letters. There are lots of things crossed out that Celestia presumably has changed her mind about saying, but in a stroke of supreme convenience, they're still available for the reader to see, even though Twilight isn't meant to. This is a huge cheat and absolutely destroys a sense of realism in letters. The fact the she never sends it is immaterial; she fully intended to when writing it, so she must either not mind that Twilight would be able to see all the crossed-out stuff, or I shouldn't be able to see it either. The only way to justify something like this is if it's something Celestia was writing for her own benefit and she never intended anyone else to read it.

>you have accomplished many thing//

Typo.

>has so much potential//

Missing end punctuation.

>continue to study magical practice and theory, heading toward a brilliant future - one where I wish to see you continue//

Repetition of "continue," and just another example of a place where you need a proper dash.

>I know that you hardly enjoyed any of my prompts for you to be enrolled in a few classes at my School for Gifted Unicorns//

I don't understand what you're saying here. Twilight was very enthusiastic about attending. It's also pretty awkwardly phrased.

>what I have done and why...//

Very, very carefully consider whether to put an ellipsis in a letter. They're speaking affectations, and they arise out of circumstance, not because the speaker planned it that way. Yet actually writing one is a very deliberate act, one which the writer must have decided is critical to the meaning. The kinds of things that lead to one in speech just don't happen in letters. Coming into earshot/waking up obviously don't happen. Losing a train of thought wouldn't happen either, since the writer can just pick back up when she does get back on track, and she wouldn't be inscribing the three dots to pass the time while she was thinking about it.

>the some of the//

Extraneous word.

>or-//

This is the same deal as an ellipsis. Really think about whether the ltter writer would go to the trouble of putting a dash there. If you got interrupted while writing, would you just continue on when you got a chance? Of course. You don't stick a dash there to let the recipient know an interruption occurred. If she's really cutting off the sentence, she'd just stop writing. She'd have to think it altered the meaning enough to include the dash if she bothered to put it there.

>to make me realized//

Typo.

>casting dramatic shadows on her face//

Why would Celestia think they were dramatic? How could she even what her face looked like?

>it became harder to breath//

Typo.

>The rest lie around her//

Why'd you switch to present tense?

>Yet, right now Celestia//

Commas after conjunctions are rarely used correctly. This one isn't.

There's not a bad message here, but it does really muddle things that this relies on some other continuity to help define the relationships. It leads to things feeling a tiny bit off, so this may not be a good point of entry into the series. Ultimately, it didn't matter that I tended to agree with Sunset, since it seems like I'm supposed to.

Chiefly, a lot of the baggage informing the conflict between Sunset and Celestia is left unspoken, and I'm guessing that's covered in more detail in another story, but having it come to a head here doesn't carry as much gravity when I don't have the history of it or the stakes that each of them attaches to it. Same goes for Celestia's desperation to use these Faithful Students as some sort of companion (and I had to read the comments to understand that—it's not evident in the story). Plus the perspective skips around, and the long letter Celestia writes has a lot of little things that harm its credibility and authenticity.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2814

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

That first scene is still really repetitive. A dark aperture forms. So far, so good. But then a second one forms, and it behaves exactly like the first. Then a third forms and behaves exactly like the other two. You say a lot of the same stuff three times.

>A flock of seagulls, circling above it, moved en masse away from it.//

If they're circling above it, then they're not moving away. And the first three sentences of this paragraph are all structured the same, which sounds repetitive.

>She sighed in content//

As a noun, "content" doesn't mean what you want it to mean here.

>The windows shuddered from the force of the winds//

They just did that about a page ago.

>across and draped a hoof across//

Watch that close word repetition.

>they sighed in content//

You just used that phrase, and "content" is still used wrong. Plus you really ought to avoid using these "in/with/of emotion" phrases. They do nothing to create a mental picture of what's happening.

Wait, are they in the Crystal Empire? If so, why do they need to build a fire? The Crystal Heart keeps the cold weather away.

>Cadance stammered//

You just used that as your last speaking verb. It's an unusual enough one that it stands out when repeated. Plus it's not even that necessary. I can see she's stammering without the narrator telling me.

>opal-colored//

Opal doesn't really have a color, since part of its charm is the interplay of colors the water in it creates.

>clad in crystalline armor//

>clad in full sets of armor//
Kind of repetitive phrasing close together.

>the guard’s otherwise stoic faces//

One guard has multiple faces? That's a singular possessive you're using.

>they?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include any question marks or exclamation marks on it in the italics.

>Another drop of sweat ran down Twilight’s muzzle and she shook her head.//

You have lots of places like this where you need a comma between clauses. When each verb goes to a different subject, you have multiple clauses, and you'll normally want to put a comma between them.

>as they stalked up to him//

"Stalk" is a strange word choice here. They're not trying to be sneaky, they don't mean him harm, and they're not upset with him.

>Cadance could only stare//

There's a lot of staring going on.

>her…” Shining trailed off.//

The trailing off is already evident from the ellipsis. You don't need to narrate it.

>Shining looked at this wife//

He has another?

>before nodded//

Missing word.

>His muzzle curled into a smile at the sight of his foal.//

He's been looking at her the whole time. When did he not have sight of her?

I do wonder why everyone accepts her explanation so readily. She really has no way of proving it.

>Twilight Sparkle squinted in the light of the mid-afternoon sun as she.//

As she what?

>while trying, futility//

futilely

>“I see,” Twilight said. “So that’s who would have gone after Flurry Heart.”//

But you're not going to say who? That's a pointless tease. It's also not one that works with the narration. Since you're using an omniscient narrator, he knows who, and he has no motivation to withhold it.

>The hole, almost in response, suddenly expanded by a quarter of its size. Another hole appeared to the side and it grew and grew before it finally joined with the much larger hole. The winds increased in intensity from there.//

And now we're getting the same play-by-play we did in the first chapter.

>Crystal watched the display with intent.//

I'm not sure if this is really what you meant. It could be valid, but I suspect you meant "intensity."

>but thought to go there//

Seems like she does the exact opposite of this.

>jumbled information//

>jumbled together//
These occur pretty close together.

>staring at it intently//

She just did so in the first sentence of this scene.

>Finally, she indeed saw the star that sat atop her tree-like castle at the northern end of Ponyville. Ponyville, then, was there, on the far side of that star.//

That basically says the same thing twice.

>To her, it seemed bottomless.//

And again, this just restates what the last sentence did.

>Ponyville, which still remained hidden behind her castle//

You just said more of it came into view, but now you're saying it's still hidden. Which is it?

>She reappeared directly over the large pointed star that was the highest point of her castle.//

You've already mentioned the star several times, and you've already noted it's at the top of the castle several times.

>but,” she pointed toward the general direction of Sugarcube Corner, “Princess//

When you have a narrative aside in a quote, use dashes, not commas:
but—” she pointed toward the general direction of Sugarcube Corner “—Princess

Why does Celestia keep using direct address with Twilight? It's not like she has trouble keeping Twilight's attention, and it's not like Twilight is unsure she's the one being spoken to.

>But, we have a duty to perform.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Recollections of prior conversations came rushing back and she thought about Miasmus.//

That's so vague to the point that I have no idea what it's talking about. What conversations? Just Crystal's descriptions? You go on to say that anyway.

Twilight's friends explaining Miasmus's back story gets very talking heads. Paragraph after paragraph goes by with no narration but a short speech tag.

>heartedly//

I have to think you meant "heartily."

>Fluttershy had reappeared, now carrying Starlight in her forehooves//

Why is this necessary? Starlight can levitate herself.

There's quite a bit of repetitive language throughout this fight scene.

I'm not sure why Twilight won't take Crystal's advice on how to fight them. Yeah, it might hurt them, but it won't kill them, and it's better than the alternative.

And I see one of the commenters made the same point I was wondering about. If Miasmus was such a threat, why didn't Crystal make sure he was dealt with while he was still weak?

>Said figure whirled around and, with energy coursing through their horn, they shot a blast of magic which barreled right into Starlight Glimmer.//

What does "they" refer to? I think you meant the horn, or you're going for a non-gender-specific pronoun, but it sounds really odd.

>tightened her Stetson//

I don't know how you'd do that. It's not an adjustable hat.

>’Course//

You don't need the apostrophe, since you're not cutting any letters off the word. You're just skipping a word.

>ignored!//

Italicize the question mark.

>Crystal drove all four of her hooves into Celestia’s back.//

Why would she do this? It'll end up hurting Celestia, too, and from what Crystal already said, it takes a concentrated magical blast. Physical attacks won't do anything, so she's willing to hurt Celestia without it accomplishing anything?

>the blob laying in the snow//

Lay/lie confusion. You need "lying" here, since there's no direct object.

>lying in the snow//

Well, you get it right this time, but it's repetitive to have the same phrase in consecutive paragraphs.

>The blog tumbled through the snow//

I didn't think they had computers.

You use some form of "blob" 8 times within barely a page.

>But, that’s what I’m here for.//

No reason to have that comma.

>I don’t know who you two are related//

Typo.

>Twilight let out a breath that she didn’t know she had been holding.//

This is the second most cliched sentence possible.

>winced in response//

>hummed in response//
These are in consecutive sentences. And then this occurs not long after:
>smiled weakly in response//

>trotted in their direction. Twilight following closely behind//

Seems like you meant that period to be a comma. This would be an odd place for a sentence fragment, and you haven't been in the habit of using them.

>Failing?//

Italicize the question mark.

>The tremors shook the castle which in turn nearly threw them off of their hooves.//

This says it's the castle that almost knocked them over.

>larged holes//

Typo.

Every time these holes form we just get the same description again.

>She could see pink-colored cloud//

>This is worst-case scenario.//
Missing word.

>you!?//

>it doesn’t exist anymore!//
Include the exclamation mark and question mark in the italics.

>staunch smells//

I'm not sure that means what you want it to mean.

>Twilight kept staring for long moments and then turned//

Missing your end punctuation.

>Twilight stepped off the map and examined.//

Examined what?

>They watched her with intent.//

What intent? Again, I think you meant "intensity." But there are lots of places like this where you give a generic descriptor instead of saying specifically how it looks. Let their personalities come through. Don't be so vague.

Twilight's awfully blase about being dropped off in a universe where she apparently just died and doesn't really know anyone here. Crystal Faire absolutely ditched her. It all happens so quickly, suddenly, and without reaction that it loses its gravity.

>she thought aloud//

Then look at the next paragraph. You use "thought" four more times there.

>Wrap-up//

Both parts of a hyphenated word get capitalized in a proper noun. And the title of the episode didn't use a hyphen anyway.

>freshly-painted//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word terms that start with an -ly adverb.

>Twilight could make out everything; the bookshelves built into the wooden walls, the wooden horse head that sat on the middle table, and the grand sun painting that took up most of the ceiling.//

The semicolon isn't used right, as what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence. You could use a colon there, since you're clarifying "everything."

>most obvious question; “How are you here right now?//

A colon would be more appropriate, since you're defining the question.

>The smells of freshly baked bread and the sweet smells of cakes and other sweets filled her nostrils; they too were as she remembered them.//

Another misused semicolon. This one should really be a dash. Also note there's more repetition in this paragraph: 2 uses of "smell" and 3 of "sweet."

>They each wore concerned frowns.//

You tell me characters are concerned quite a bit.

>I… tell me this; Flurry Heart… she broke the Crystal Heart, right?//

That semicolon would work better as a colon, since you're defining "this."

>she looked at Pinkie Pie and Fluttershy//

You've capitalized/punctuated that like a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>Buckball//

Why is that capitalized?

>globed eyes//

That's a really strange word choice. It just means they're round. But they always were, right? That's just the default. If they're not, then something is really wrong.

>Twilight furrowed her brow and struck the ground.//

But she's on a balcony, well above the ground.

This story has kind of derailed. At first it was about Crystal Faire trying to save entire universes, and Twilight got swept up in that battle for her own, but now we're on our second chapter of Twilight's existential crisis of being in a similar universe to her own. It's tangentially relevant, and it's not really going anywhere to have her constantly hem and haw about whether to tell her friends what she knows.

>pouring over a lot of history books//

poring

>soy eggs//

We've seen Pinkie use eggs in baking, and Fluttershy's henhouse isn't necessary if she's not collecting the eggs. I don't know that you need to specify they aren't chicken eggs.

>and viola//

That's a musical instrument. You want "voila."

>words multiverse//

But that's only one word.

Man, and now half this chapter is going to be a lesson on timeline branching? Most readers already understand that, and even for those who don't, a far shorter explanation would do.

>infinitely many time//

Typo.

>gives rise to infinitely many and always increasing amount of Crystal Faires//

Missing a word, and "amount" is for collective quantities. You want "number."

>now blank canvas//

now-blank

>now empty teapot//

now-empty

The story's definitely improved, to the point I read everything you've published so far. It does deliver on the interesting plot, but it really gets bogged down in chapters 7 and 8 when nothing much of note happens, and we get a pretty self-explanatory science lesson where there are only a few pertinent details.

It still gets pretty blunt with just naming character emotions instead of demonstrating them at times. And I pointed out lots of places where it was vague or repetitive, but nowhere near all of them. The repetition was the biggest problem I saw on the mechanical side.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2815

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She sat down upon her hind legs, wrapping her front ones around herself for warmth; teeth chattering as she rubbed herself in a vigorous attempt to keep out the cold.//

The semicolon isn't used right, as what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>“Add f-f-f-freezing to freak-ky f-f-forest,” she stuttered.//

The stuttering's already obvious from the punctuation. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>Apple Bloom began shivering again, though not from the cold. She didn’t want to admit it, but her fear might actually be true; she really was all alone. That was the last thing she wanted to believe. Her only choice was to keep trying in hope that somepony she knew might also be in the dark, scary woods with her, where the tree branches hung overhead like dragon claws.//

Two things to say here: First, you've used a fair number of these "start" and "begin" actions already. Use them very sparingly. It's self-explanatory that any given action will begin, so it's only worth pointing out the beginning if it's significant in some way, like it's abrupt or the action never finishes. And second, look how many "to be" verbs you have in this paragraph. There are five of them. They're inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens. It keeps things more interesting if you can use active verb choices.

>YA’//

Why do you have an apostrophe here? You're not cutting off any of the word.

>HEL— Ow!//

Don't put any spaces around an em dash.

>If it wasn’t a dream, then how did she get here in the first place?//

For the most part, your narrator sounds omniscient, but you occasionally lapse into having it sound limited. Asking questions is one way, since this is essentially the narrator voicing Apple Bloom's thoughts for her. But if you do want a limited narrator, there are a few problems. One is that you take this conversational tone so rarely that the whole thing sounds omniscient anyway. Another is that you use descriptors for her like "the filly," which she'd never use to refer to herself, so it doesn't fit a limited narrator. It's probably easier to remove the few traces of limited narration, but it's definitely harder to write omniscient than most people think it is.

>W...Wh..Wha..//

You really have a lot of stuttering in the chapter, and it's getting to be a bit much. And unless it's a word that needs to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first instance of it in a stutter. And those two-dot ellipses need another dot.

>she trembled//

That's a really odd choice of speech tag. How do you tremble a sentence? It's not even a transitive verb.

>Her ears frantically twisted and turned, trying to identify where the noise was precisely coming from//

This is pretty much exactly what you said in the first sentence of this paragraph.

>looking around with wide, terrified eyes//

She just looked around in the last paragraph.

>ripping the bow of her mane//

While that's potentially valid, I still think there's a typo making it mean something other than intended.

>as soon as it had came//

come

>staring around into the darkest parts of the woods//

So she's looking around again? It's getting repetitive, and it's incredibly vague each time. Give me some specifics so that it's different each time.

>J-Just//

Only capitalize the first.

>If Applejack had been there, she would have been so proud of how brave her little sister looked right then.//

Another spot where the narration changes to feeling limited.

>this….//

One dot too many. A four-dot ellipsis is for excerpts from source material in formal writing.

>the small filly//

You're having the narrator take Apple Bloom's voice, so why would you have her refer to herself like this?

>once quiet woods//

once-quiet

>Her mouth was dry after that last scream she tried desperately to catch her breath as she ran.//

Something got messed up there.

>Why was this happening to her.//

That's a question, isn't it?

>drawn out yawn//

drawn-out

Really? She's being pursued by an ominous figure in a scary place, and she's going to sleep?

>away..//

Extraneous period.

There are far better ways to indicate something's a dream that italics. They're fine for short passages, but you don't want to use them for extended ones, much less entire scenes. They get irritating to read, for one thing, and for another, they add emphasis, but when everything's emphasized, effectively nothing is.

>made her stomach grumbled//

Typo.

>hope beaming from her eyes//

This is her experience of the dream. How can she see her own eyes to make this assessment?

>all too familiar voice//

all-too-familiar

>Applebloom//

Typo.

>Applejack looked down, rather baffled by Apple Bloom’s frantic state//

This paragraph feels like it's from Applejack's perspective, but it's Apple Bloom's dream.

>Landshakes//

Land sakes

>ya’//

You're doing that unnecessary apostrophe again. You'll have to scan for these.

>back.“Don’t ya worry little sis.//

Missing space, missing comma for direct address.

>Her heart skipped, and she suddenly stumbled, her hooves flailing as she collapsed onto the forest floor. She lay on her back, panic rising as she tried to roll over and up again, but she couldn’t move a muscle. Her eyes were heavy as she looked up at the black sky and wished she could feel the sun’s rays one last time.//

Watch that you don't fall into a rut with repetitive sentence structures like this. You have three in a row with "as" clauses, and the first two both have an absolute phrase on the end of the main clause. Then you have a bunch more "as" clauses in the next paragraph.

You have a disconnect, considering you're using a limited narrator for Apple Bloom. The narration essentially represents her thoughts as well, but when you have quoted thoughts, you write out her accent, yet the narrative doesn't. They're basically the same thing, so why treat them differently? It's also a good reason to avoid writing an accent too much: if you actually did put it in the narration, it'd be really annoying to read that much of it. To her, she doesn't have an accent, after all. It's better to leave the accent up to the reader to imagine. It's more about word choice and phrasing to get the character voice right.

>the little filly that had been lying there moments before had vanished//

Yeah, your perspective's jumping around. You started the scene with Apple Bloom, but then you switched over to this shadow.

>Do not fear little one.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>all too familiar voice//

Same hyphenation as before. And maybe it's not such a good idea to use the same phrasing.

>But I assure you//

>Apple Bloom started to feel a little reassured//
Kind of repetitive and self-explanatory.

>Indeed, Apple Bloom was right.//

And now you're jumping over to Luna's perspective. Check out the section on head hopping at the top of this thread.

>wait while I’ll contend with this shadow creature//

That verb tense of "I'll" doesn't quite work.

>tha’//

You're definitely overwriting her accent. How would this even sound any different from the right spelling?

>the Shadow//

>the shadow//
You're inconsistent at capitalizing that.

>it’s golden eyes shining with rage//

Its/it's confusion.

>The Shadow slithered across the ground..

You just had it slither a few paragraphs ago. That's an unusual enough word that it stands out when repeated too soon.

>thou’ thinks thee//

I have no idea why an apostrophe would be there, and if you want to use archaic language, please research how to use it right.

>dared not to risk//

The "to" is implied in that type of phrasing. You don't need it there.

>There it was again, Apple Bloom eyes darted around//

Comma splice, missing possessive.

>Tis’//

The apostrophe is on the wrong end of that word.

>This is not a dream at all//

How would Luna not know this? I mean, in "Princess Twilight," she was the one telling Celestia what was or wasn't a dream.

>pegasi control//

Noun adjuncts are singular.

>“Indeed,” Celestia nodded, “I believe//

You're using a non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>Apple Bloom insisted//

Missing end punctuation.

>all too familiar sound//

You really like that phrase.

>messed up covers//

messed-up covers

>Rise and shine everypony!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>she wondered aloud//

Missing end punctuation.

>Apple Bloom let out a giggle, “Oh well//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

Well, you've tagged this comedy, but there's not a hint of it to be found so far. So I can't evaluate how well it does with the humor.

There are a few pervasive mechanical problems, but the most consistent thing is the perspective. You wander back and forth between sounding omniscient (particularly in the prologue) and limited (in chapter 1), but even when you use limited more consistently, you hop around to different characters abruptly and often. It's not a good idea to jerk the reader around like that.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2816

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>looked about, but in the gloom of her room, nothing looked//

Watch the close word repetition.

>The pegasus's soft words were cut off//

You're using a limited narrator for her, so the narration is essentially her own thoughts. Why would she refer to herself as "the pegasus"? People just don't think of themselves in such external terms. And you used an ellipsis to end her speech. If she's getting cut off, use a dash.

>small basket beside her bed that contained a small//

Watch the word repetition again.

>her soft tone succeed//

Typo.

>the cyan pegasus//

This is someone she knows well. You don't think of your best friends in such abstract terms, do you?

>That idea didn't really help, however, in fact, it mane her limbs become even more rigid as she shivered.//

That second comma is a splice, and you have a typo.

>hoof step//

That'd be one word, like "footstep."

>too much to bare//

bear

>Darkness covered most of the scene the only light was that of the moon streaming in through the window.//

Run-on sentence.

>an another//

Extraneous word.

>then pause//

Typo.

>silted//

Typo.

>"Wait!" A small voice called//

Capitalization.

>the pegasus's//

Another oddly external reference for her to use about herself.

>it was not only herself seemed to feel terrified//

Phrasing is off.

>A filly that//

For sentient creatures, you'll normally use "who" instead of "that."

>thing sin//

Typo.

>this pony who's house she's invaded//

Whose. And why are you using present tense?

>the yellow pegasus//

Another odd reference. You'll need to scan for these. I'm not going to keep marking them.

>freighted//

Typo.

You sure have characters scoping out escape routes through the windows a lot.

>against all of her better judgments//

This seems to have shifted to the batpony's perspective. There's no way Fluttershy could know this.

>cautiously shuffled forwards//

Phrasing is off.

>If there was one thing Fluttershy knew how to do; it was how to calm something down when they were frightened.//

That semicolon should be a comma.

>Pleased to meet you Moonlight.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>her attention seeming lost elsewhere//

You've been using "seem" a whole lot lately. It's getting repetitive.

>Fluttershy's expression turned to slight concern//

Keep the perspective in mind. How can Fluttershy see her own face to note this?

>'She must really be hungry?'//

Why is that a question? It's not really phrased like one.

>belive//

Typo.

>Manticore//

Why is that capitalized?

>faces hoofed//

Typo.

>I got lost one time and, well I've been all alone ever since//

That's a really strange explanation. Nobody's gone looking for her? They're not that close to the mountains, so she wandered far away. Wouldn't she stick around the mountains if she wanted to be found? She also makes it sound like it's been quite some time since she got lost. We never get an explanation of any of this.

>Moments ago, she'd been wary of no more than a simple hoof step, maybe getting too close was not the best idea right now.//

Comma splice.

>Sill//

>Ponyvill//
Typos.

>Oh'//

What's that apostrophe for?

>Nothing in the pegasus's honest expression suggested as much, however.//

You've slipped over to Moonlight's perspective.

>Theses//

Typo.

>every other pony//

Missing end punctuation.

>the presence of the apple where insulting to her guest//

Typo.

>hoofs//

hooves

>wondering around out there alone//

Typo.

>if you wanted to." Fluttershy offered//

Punctuation.

>hiding the fact that she suspected Moonlight may have come back to steal food tomorrow night either way//

That's over-explaining things. This is where a limited narrator comes in useful. Just have the narrator express that thought instead of saying the Fluttershy hides it. The fact she doesn't say it out loud already tells me that.

>Yet, it was far from the monstrous assertiveness she'd once harbored.//

No reason to have that comma.

>reached right past it hug hugged the pegasus's forelegs tightly//

Phrasing is off.

>you." She assured her//

>common." She finally admitted//
Capitalization/punctuation.

This is really strange that Fluttershy never asks about her family. Nobody's looking for Moonlight? That never occurs to Fluttershy? She just assumes a lost child will be forgotten and written off. And Moonlight never expresses anything about her family either. Maybe that's telling, that batponies just operate that way, but Fluttershy couldn't assume that to be the case. It just feels like a huge chunk of the thought process here is missing.

Aside from that, there are still lots of typos and mechanical things here, and numerous slips in the perspective.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2823

Ayy, cheers for the details feedback. I'm the guy behind >>2814. This is actually immensely helpful, and I'm glad that you took the time to do this. People who are willing to dig this deep are too rare and, obviously, you can't improve if no one says anything. I'm working through all the line items that you did bring up and then I'm going to take care of those broader mechanical problems.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2824

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

A word about your synopsis: it basically tells me nothing. Twilight's very close with her friends, but an old threat will require their intervention. This could describe tens of thousands of stories on FiMFicition. What's different about yours? What's going to grab a reader's interest and make them choose yours over all the rest? You're not giving them much to work with.

Since the author's note in chapter 1 is nothing the reader needs to understand the story, it'd be a much better idea to put it at the end of the chapter. You don't want the first thing the reader sees once he's decided to read it is something that isn't the story.

>Celestia’s sun//

And then the very first phrase of the story is something incredibly cliched. Every other story on FiMFiction calls them "Celestia's sun" and "Luna's moon." It doesn't set a good opening tone for the story's originality. For that matter, this is what we call a "weather report opening." Unless the weather will soon be pertinent to the action, it's irrelevant and boring. It tells the reader you don't have anything more interesting to say.

>pony-tongue//

I don't get why she needs to specify "pony" here. What difference does it make?

>B.B.B.F.F..//

You don't need an additional period after the abbreviation.

>Perhaps shorten it the acronym//

Extraneous word.

Another thing. Your first paragraph has 7 "to be" verbs. The next has 2, then 2, then 3, and so on. Those aren't terrible in isolation, but stacked all together? "To be" is a very boring verb, as nothing happens. It brings the story's action to a halt, and you don't want it feeling stagnant right from the beginning. It's not hard to rephrase a lot of these things with active verbs.

>the traditional earth pony town of Ponyville//

You haven't billed this as an AU. While Ponyville was founded by earth ponies, the big selling point for it with the Equestria Games committee was that all three kinds of ponies coexist well there. They do some things by earth pony tradition, like Winter Wrap Up, but I wouldn't call it a traditional earth pony town.

>Lyra however, was very much in favor of something more modern.//

If you're going to use that comma, you need to pair it with one before the word as well.

>Twilight didn’t really care for the term Throne Room to describe her place of study either//

But she doesn't really use that as a study room. She does have a library in the castle.

>S.O.S..//

Extraneous period.

>doubletake//

double-take

>stretched her neck to the side and grimaced, stretching//

Watch the close word repetition like that.

>she had lost track of the time and Spike, bless his heart, had fallen asleep//

>She extinguished her everburning candle, and opened her wings wide//
You have the comma usage backward here. In the first, both subjects get their own verb so they're separate clauses and need a comma. In the second, the same subject gets both verbs, so don't use one. There's a guide to "comma use with conjunctions" at the top of this thread, and I'll just leave it at tat instead of marking any more.

>the drake’s//

You're using a limited narrator here, essentially Twilight's inner thoughts, so why would she choose to refer to Spike with such an impersonal term?

>She turned in horror, to find her fear had been realized//

There's no reason to have that comma.

>Spike had sneezed and singed off more than half of her beautiful tail.//

Well, there are kind of two things here. One, it's obvious what's happened, so the drawn-out explanation feels kind of condescending. And two, having it that drawn-out implies that Twilight stands there with her tail burning, thinking through all this before she does anything about it. That undermines that it would be a reflex, panicked action.

>Her tail was gone and she was balancing chemical reactions?!//

Why does she need to balance them? Doesn't she already know what the reactions are? Or has she never considered them before? Seems like she would, living with a fire-breathing dragon.

>you walking fire hazard!//

She's being awfully insensitive about this. It's not like he can help it, and she already spoke to this being an ongoing problem, so she should already know to give him a wide berth.

>She glanced away quickly with her cheeks coloring//

Consider again the perspective. How does she know her cheeks are coloring? She can't see them. She might conclude it from the feeling of warmth, but even then, the more pertinent conclusion is that she's blushing.

>36//

>24//
Write out numbers that short.

>Spike knew that when Twilight started to go off on one of her rants, it was sometimes best to not add fuel to the fire.//

Why are you hopping over to Spike's perspective now? It's not impossible to, but i don't see what it adds, plus this was a very abrupt transition. It's usually better to just stick with one character per scene.

>After a moment’s stare, one of her eyebrows suddenly rose.//

You just told me something else "suddenly" happened in the previous sentence. This is a word that should be used sparingly anyway. If you write it well, it will inherently feel sudden. Having to say so is like assuring the reader that a joke is funny.

>Spike suddenly widened//

How does he do that? Is he puffing up with air or something? I don't understand.

>gonna…” Spike trailed off//

The ellipsis already means he's trailing off, so you don't have to narrate it as well. The same thing goes for indicating interruptions with dashes.

>sure - I’d//

Please use proper dashes for asides and cutoffs, not hyphens.

>creepy; um, PRETTY… yeah, pretty forest//

For a semicolon to be used properly, you should be able to split the sentence there and have both parts stand as complete.

>Suddenly, his demeanor changed//

And there's that word again.

>What… message?//

When a word is italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include a question mark or exclamation mark on it in the italics.

>Beside, she couldn't let their tea get cold!//

Besides

>11//

Write it out.

>nodding her head in excitement//

Just a paragraph ago, you had:
>Melon Seed’s wings trembled with excitement//
Beyond just being repetitive, this "in/with/of emotion" phrasing is one you should avoid anyway. It's more engaging to demonstrate the emotion that name it, and with these phrasings in particular, there's almost always a demonstration of it already present that makes the phrase redundant.

>On a perpendicular line of thought, are these cinnamon buns the only thing the Princesses are having?! Where are all of the other servers with enormous platters and feasts piled high, ready to impress, and fit for royalty?//

The only reason to use present tense there is if you want it to be a direct quoted thought. If so, then italicize it.

>eventually found herself pouring the tea//

This implies she's oblivious to how she got there, but she isn't.

>light from the window lit//

So the light lit? Anyway, this is another paragraphs awash in "to be" verbs. You don't have any until the second half of it, and then five instances of "was" pop up in only four sentences.

>Melon Seed wings twitched with excitement//

Missing possessive, and that's pretty much the exact phrase you started the scene with.

>Why sister//

When used as a term of address, family relations get capitalized.

>However, It//

Extraneous capitalization.

>protégé//

Twilight's female, so protégée.

>soaking to bottom//

Typo.

>After moment//

Missing word.

>Celestia sighed, and looked over her left shoulder to the new serving mare, the one with a melon slice for a cutie mark.//

And now you've skipped over to Celestia's perspective, where the whole scene had been in Melon's. I don't see that the shift accomplishes anything. What do we learn with Celestia that we couldn't have with Melon? For that matter, when you use a limited narrator, you need to make sure it stays consistently limited, so when you go through Celestia and Luna's long exchange, check in every couple of paragraphs with one of Melon's observations about what's going on, or else the whole thing tends to lapse back into sounding like an omniscient narrator.

>Right away, princess!//

Titles also get capitalized when used as terms of address.

>and then used her magic to pour fresh tea into her cup. She then stood up//

Repetitive "then" phrasings. The perspective has a hitch in it here again, but it's something comedies get some leeway on. If you'd stayed in Melon's perspective for the whole scene, you couldn't have the bit at the end, since she leaves. So maybe it is okay to move to Celestia's perspective, but you need to do so smoothly. You start with Melon, then you go a long time sounding omniscient, then you go to Celestia. A smooth transition would make that omniscient part much shorter and more gradual.

>ship, Hecate,//

You don't really need those commas. An appositive can go without them in this kind of phrasing.

>The fact that she was judged as such came as no surprise//

You never say how they did so, which makes this have little gravity.

>That, and her mode of speech and dress seemed odd or archaic.//

This seems to be in more of a crowd perspective than in Tempest's. And without any new information, like examples of specific events, this paragraph just ends up repeating once or twice what the scene's first one already said.

>The Lunar Princess slowly stirred her tea//

It gets irritating to read extended passages in italics. Just make this a separate scene in regular font with a segue.

>shutting them closed//

What else would shutting them do?

>the Lunar Guards that stood without//

When referring to sentient beings, it's preferred to use "who" instead of "that."

Okay, you already summarized what happens in this scene before we even got to it, so what's the point of reading it? It ends up being an important emotional moment, so I'd keep the scene and cut the summary that precedes it.

>the alicorn stood and drew near//

This is her mother. In your own thoughts, would you refer to your mother as "the lady"?

>child...continue//

Leave a space after an ellipsis.

>hoof steps//

That'd be one word, like "footsteps."

>the cloaked unicorn//

It's even more odd for her to refer to herself in such an external manner.

>thousand yard stare//

thousand-yard

>the look on Tempest’s face making her shudder as if touched by a sudden chill//

Seems to have shifted to Meadow Lark's perspective.

>hoping the other mare either didn’t catch on//

Sounds like you meant to put another option on there.

>She watched as the taller mare’s mood seemed to darken again.//

And this is definitely not in Tempest's perspective. You're jumping around too much, and I bet you don't even realize you're doing it.

>her brows furrowing in confusion//

You'll normally set off an absolute phrase with a comma. Otherwise, it makes it sound like she paused her brows. I had to reread it to parse it right.

>I hear that the Diarchy of olden times, is ruling in harmony again//

No reason to have that comma there.

>How in Equestria could she not know about…//

You keep skipping back and forth between their perspectives. It's jarring.

>Capital//

>the Library//
Why are those capitalized?

These two are using quite a bit of direct address in their conversation, unnaturally so. Consider how often you actually do in a real one-one-one talk. It's used to get someone's attention, disambiguate who's intended to hear it, or add emphasis, and that last one is the only reason it might be necessary here, but emphasis should be sparing, or it loses its effectiveness.

>gazing at the horizon//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>but there was a sense that perhaps this little pony wanted more from the interaction and seemed disheartened about something//

Don't over-explain things. This was already apparent from her speech and behavior.

>“You sent half of my bucking tail… TO CELESTIA?!”//

Shouldn't she already know this is how it works?

>besides the point//

beside

>I suppose it’s possible. Wouldn’t be outside the realm of possibility.//

He... said the same thing twice.

>She’s never done that as an alicorn before.//

You need to be careful managing the verb tenses and quoted thought versus thought as narration.

>"Don’t tell me to calm down! I. AM. CALM."//

Note how these quotation marks don't match what you use through most of the chapter. They should be consistent.

>Twilight growled and spun on her heel, stalking off to a cabinet near the window.//

Look how structurally repetitive this paragraph is. Three things authors of moderate experience tend to lean too heavily on are participial phrases, absolute phrases (another kind of participial element), and "as" clauses. They're nicely descriptive, but they don't turn up much in everyday conversation, so they stand out as unusual much more easily when used repeatedly. Moreover, authors tend to use them in the same few places in sentences, so it's not just the repetition of having them in the first place, but where they are. So by sentence, we have in this paragraph:
Main clause, participial phrase
Main clause, absolute phrase, participial phrase
Main clause, absolute phrase
Main clause, participial phrase
Main clause, "as" clause

I'll grab that last excerpt again. Note that all three of these structures mean that things happen at the same time. Yet Twilight doesn't stalk off until after she turns on her heel. Make sure when you use these structures that you don't synchronize things that shouldn't be.

>lavender alicorn//

Another reference that doesn't make sense for the perspective, but it's also a very cliched type. In fact, the practice was named after this one exactly! There's a brief discussion of Lavender Unicorn Syndrome at the top of this thread that will explain.

>punctuating her words by her hoofsteps//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>one hundred and ten percent//

Someone as scientific as she is would know it's improper to put "and" in there.

I still don't get why Twilight is being so hard on Spike about this. It wasn't his fault, and she should have known better to steer clear of him.

>Centaur//

Why is that capitalized?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2825

>>2824
>Perhaps she had gone too far//
You've jumped perspective again. There's a short discussion of head hopping at the top of this thread.

>Twilight brought a hoof to her face//

Missing a line break.

>Jour//

Not sure why that's capitalized.

>back to Spike and dropping her voice back//

Watch the close word repetition.

>gave a hearty chuckle and his guardian’s colorful imagination//

Typo.

>as she looked back at him, shaking her head as her ears folded back//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in one sentence. In addition to the repetition, it muddles up the chronology, as it tries to synchronize lots of things.

>she certainly had a flare for the dramatic//

flair

>there was a mare that//

Use "who."

This is a really cumbersome passage where Dash evaluates all her friends. It's largely irrelevant, and it goes on awfully long. It's hard to keep a tangent interesting.

>air density//

Why would she bother with that? You have to be going a few hundred miles per hour before it's worth accounting for density variations.

>The Unicorn//

Why are you capitalizing "unicorn"?

>the pegasus//

Another strangely external reference.

>a truncated “Whoa-!”//

When you put "a" in front of a quote like that, it makes it generic and not an actual quote. Thus you don't need to lead into it with a comma, which you got correct, but you don't need to capitalize it either. And it's redundant to call it truncated when you're also using a dash.

>The populace of this city//

You just used "populace" a paragraph ago.

>protected and incentivized it’s citizens//

Its/it's confusion.

>She grit her teeth.//

The past tense is "gritted."

>The only plausible answer that Tempest could see, was that Luna had somehow been enthralled by some magical device or stratagem//

No reason to have that comma.

>the one pony that//

who

So after getting a long ramble from Dash, now there's a long ramble from Tempest. I don't get why she's heading to the library when she's already concluded she can't trust anything she finds there. And why doesn't it occur to her to see what the batponies have to say about any of it?

>it’s patterns and movements//

Its/it's confusion again. Possessive pronouns never have apostrophes, like hers, yours, and theirs.

>your highness//

Honorifics like this should be capitalized.

>humming to herself, while Twilight turned back to her breakfast groaning to herself//

Repetitive phrasing.

>Twilight lit up her own horn as she straightened the bathrobe she was wearing once again, cringing as she remembered entering the dining room only minutes ago.//

Two "as" clauses in a single sentence. And the previous one had another.

>the Castle’s//

Why is that capitalized?

>scrunched up muzzles//

scrunched-up muzzles

>Relieved that she successfully diverted attention away from her tail//

Don't over-explain things like this.

>If we don’t, win this time//

Why is that comma there?

>Without looking up, she chimed in//

>She rolled her eyes, doing air quotes with her hooves//
Missing punctuation.

>Spike sprayed tea out his nose with//

With what?

>Alicorn//

Not sure why you randomly capitalize races in some spots and not others.

>turned back to assistant//

Missing word.

>shouted “MAIL’S HERE!”//

That is a direct quote, so you need a comma.

>muttering, “and//

Capitalization.

Now we're back to the shipping plot. I hope there will be a point to it sometime. It's odd to pop over to a generic romance when there's no established connection to the main plot. Not that it can't work as a subplot, but there's no preamble to it. It's just suddenly dropped on us that Dash is in love with Rarity, but we just have to take the story's word for it. If you want this plot to be engaging (aside from the readers who like all shipping no matter what), it takes building it up to make the romance believable. What does Dash like about Rarity? What does she think each of them would give and take from a relationship? Aragon has a series of blog posts linked from his homepage that discuss how to build an authentic romance. They're worth reading.

>hangin//

Needs an apostrophe or another letter.

>I am happy to hear whatever it is you have to say; whatever it is you want to ask!//

Misused semicolon.

>Rarity’s brows knitted//

Unless you're talking about sewing, the more standard past tense is "knit."

>Her friend was obviously beating around the bush so hard, there wasn’t much of a bush left.//

Now you've abruptly switched to Rarity's perspective.

>Rares!” She insisted//

>YEAH!” She near-shouted//
Capitalization.

>Let me guess: A strapping and muscular earth pony?//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>bringing her hooves together beneath her chin and fluttered her eyelashes//

The verb forms don't match.

>#1//

Spell it out.

>I suppose I’ll have to keep you in a moat or something//

Missing end punctuation.

>now sweating dragon//

now-sweating dragon

>avionics//

I have to think you meant aviation. This term refers to the electronics. In fact, it's a portmanteau of aviation electronics.

>longsuffering//

That's not one word.

>“Yeah, just like you followed the instructions and “burned the water” while trying your hoof at spaghetti, eh Twi?//

Missing your closing quotes, and when you have nested quotations, alternate double and single quotation marks with each nesting level.

>exclaiming, “that//

Capitalization.

>Why are you trying to get away from Rarity, did you just escape from a dress fitting that went terribly wrong?//

Comma splice.

So I'm 15k words into the story now, and a significant chunk of it is spent on Rainbow's love interest, Spike's growth, and Twilight's tail, none of which yet have any apparent relation to the story the synopsis promises. We only got one short scene of that in the entire second chapter. You can only string along readers for so long before they're going to want to know what relevance any of this has. I'll press on, but if I were reading this purely for pleasure, this is about the point I'd drop out.

>you see darling//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>free of charge!.//

Extraneous punctuation.

>Rarities left flank//

You have a plural where you need a possessive.

>Her eyes darted away, considering her response.//

This says her eyes considered her response.

>was the Elements of Harmony//

Number mismatch.

>now apparently now//

Repetition.

>Sister’s Castle//

Shouldn't that possessive be plural? And the canon name is Castle of the Two Sisters, unless you're saying that changed over time.

>upon the Lunar Princess upon//

Kind of repetitive.

>She the silent unicorn again//

Missing word.

>er sister, and now… her niece?

This is Tempest's reminiscence. Why is it taking on Celestia's perspective?

>Now, the geas had broken//

How'd that happen? Seems like an important even worth describing.

>hoof-written note she had received last night. It was hoof written//

Repetitive.

>stetson//

That's a proper noun.

>ear to ear smile//

ear-to-ear smile

>earthpony//

earth pony

>leaning her head in conspiratorially//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>leaning her head in conspiratorially//

Capitalization.

>looking mare looked//

Repetitive.

>Corner-” she leaned back again in a normal voice “my//

Missing a dash.

>returned to her stage whisper//

Missing punctuation.

>Master of Ceremonies Mode//

I don't get why that's italicized.

So now there's yet another plot going on that has no apparent relation to any of the others? That brings the total to four. It's like reading four separate stories, not one story with multiple subplots.

Going into chapter 4 now. Well, chapter 3 part 2. But I'm going to cut back on what I note now, because I don't need to keep saying the same things over and over. If I've already noted something multiple times, assume you need to scan the whole story for it.

>Applejack stumbled backwards in surprise//

Missing a line break.

>Pinkies ears and mane//

Missing apostrophe.

>barrel.“Trust me!

Missing space.

>anypony that could fill that roll//

role

>butter yellow pegasus//

That's one of the most cliched descriptions in the fandom.

And for a chapter that promised to continue your fourth subplot, a fifth one has popped up. Honestly, this feels like an anthology of unrelated stories more so than a single coherent one.

>paying if forward//

Typo.

>‘body’” Discord muttered.//

Missing punctuation.

>I thought the bluebelles’ color added a nice compliment.//

Unless they have nice things to say, you want "complement."

>Feeling curious, Moonlight’s eyes//

This says that her eyes felt curious.

>Manehattan Times//

Magazine titles get italicized, too.

>reaching orangish red glow//

Missing word.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

>don’t know my away//

Typo.

>chillies//

chilies

>she excitedly agreed represent//

Missing word.

>yelled “we//

>growling “how//
Punctuation/capitalization.

>shouting “FOOOOD//

Punctuation.

>to…” At this point, Rarity trailed off//

The ellipsis already tells me she trailed off.

>Spike’s jaw fell open, his arms quickly went slack by his sides.//

Comma splice.

>Leeeeeroooyy Jennnkinnns//

Meme humor is a good way to make sure your story doesn't age well. And this is already a very old joke.

>exclaiming “Thank//

Punctuation.

>pegusi// (you get this one wrong several times)

>theim//
Typo.

>The greatest loss however was that of Cloudchaser, and she had steadily been losing to Team Pink’s air superiority ever since.//

It's been so long since you mentioned Granny, and a lot of other females have come up, that it's very ambiguous who "she" is here.

>ordinance//

This is a type of law. You want "ordnance."

>cause//

Missing an apostrophe, when it's short for "because."

>a “Ooh-Rah!”//

an

>Staff sergeant Octavia//

>colonel Smith//
When put on a name or used as a term of address, ranks get capitalized.

>I won’t let you down, Ma’am.//

"Ma'a," wouldn't be capitalized.

>General Rarity//

She just showed up and hadn't been a party to the action. How is Granny Smith already identifying her as a general. particularly when she only has 2 followers?

>lil//

li'l

>protégé//

Scootaloo's female, so protégée.

>in-between//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>tremorous//

tremulous

So it should be obvious what mechanical and stylistic things need work. Basically anything I had to point out repeatedly, and again, I just marked some examples, not every instance, so there are still plenty for you to find. The biggest ones were repetition and how the perspective constantly wavers. Changing perspective over scene breaks is fine, but shifting it within a scene takes some finesse to accomplish. You don't want to jerk the reader around to various characters' heads, and while within a perspective pay attention to whether the narration fits how that character would say or perceive something.

But the overall issue, like I said earlier, is that this feels like a collection of unrelated stories instead of anything coherent. There are some weak ties, like how Rarity and Rainbow Dash strode into the food fight after coming in from their shipping plot, but the shipping has no bearing on the food fight, so there's no tie-in; what happens in the dating plot doesn't matter to what happens in the food fight. Furthermore, the story only advertises that it's going to be about this Tempest adventure plot, but so far, we see precious little of it. It's only been a small part of any chapter, and seemingly diminishes more with each successive one. I think I saw only one scene of her in every chapter, and in the last few, they were very short scenes. Nothing of consequence has happened in any of them, and at 33k words in, you're stringing the reader on an awful lot with the hope that all these subplots are going to start influencing each other, and that Tempest's plot will start going somewhere.

Each of the subplots is fine on its own and could make for a cute story. They're not badly written either. But in the assembly, they don't make a whole, at least not that's evident so far, and it's a lot to ask a reader to hang on for that. I usually don't pay any attention to a story's voting ratio or number of views, since they can be misleading about quality, but they can be illustrative at times. And you have a huge drop-off in views at chapter 4. I think this is why. It's not clear the story is going anywhere. A drop-off is normal, but most quality stories retain about 1/3-1/2 of readers through the final chapter, but you're already down to 1/2 by chapter 3 and 1/4 by chapter 5. It's not that we care how many views a story will get, and there can be good reasons why quality stories wouldn't get many, but I think they're telling you something in this case.

reply to feedback Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2826

>>2824
Thank you for your detailed input. I relish feedback like this, because I want to get it right, and improve. I will fix the perspective changes, and I will give Tempest a more balanced follow and conflict in the early going. The subplots have their uses, but I see your point. I am heading out on a cruise to Alaska tomorrow, and in my downtime, will peck away at these fixes. I guess I will flag you when I am done, unless there is a better way to notify that it is ready for review again... Thanks, mate!

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2839

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I assume your synopsis is supposed to be formatted as multiple paragraphs, but you don't have indentations or line breaks between any of them.

Right away, you have a stagnant feel to your story. This is why: Over your first eight paragraphs, which is how much of the beginning fits on one screen for me, you have 7 instances of "was" and 2 each of "be" and "being." So, 11 "to be" verbs in 8 paragraphs. This is a very boring verb, as nothing happens. It's very possible to rephrase a lot of that with active verbs. You don't have to get rid of them altogether, but reduce them where you can, especially at the beginning, where you want to create a feeling of action. For instance, what does it harm to rephrase "being able to help ponies who needed assistance" as "helping ponies who needed assistance"?

>Wha made Celestia sick//

Typo.

>A tiny smile curled Celestia's lips and she sat up in her bed//

Most times, you'll use a comma with a conjunction when it separates clauses (where each subject gets its own verb: smile curled, and she sat). Conversely, you normally won't use a comma when it's one subject performing both verbs or two subjects performing the same verb.

>if her loyal subjects saw their princess taking a day off they would naturally feel justified in doing the same//

And along those lines, you need a comma in there.

>When her sister Luna was young, she used to try to shirk her duties//

It's not clear which of them "she" refers to here.

>... And//

Don't leave a space after an ellipsis when it starts a sentence.

>Luna would come to her bedchambers to check on her and she could pretend to be sick//

Needs a comma. I trust you get the picture on this by now. I'm not going to keep marking them.

>(long story)//

This is really intrusive, and I'll tell you why. It implies that she's actively telling the story to an audience, yet you haven't defined any such audience. Until now, it was the standard type of narration that doesn't address anyone in particular, but this makes the narration very self-aware that it's talking to the reader. Coupled with the limited narration you're using, that means Celestia is aware she has a reader (or listener), yet we don't know who that is or what her motivation is to tell them. It's the kind of thing that belongs in a frame story, like if you'd started by having her invite the reader (or some other explicit audience) to sit down and listen to her tale, but it doesn't belong in a standard narration.

>The alicorn//

We term these types of references Lavender Unicorn Syndrome, or LUS, and they have their uses, but you have to think about whether they're appropriate. Because of the limited narrator you're using, the narration is Celestia's stream of thought. So you have Celestia choosing to refer to her own sister as "the alicorn." Besides being vague as to which one of them this means, it's just not something people do. Would you refer to your father in your own thoughts as "the human"? It just doesn't work. People refer to others they know mostly by name or pronoun, but the two kinds of LUS that work in limited narration are 1) when the perspective character doesn't know who it is, so such a descriptor is the only option they have for a reference, or 2) a descriptor that defines their relationship, since people do think in terms of those. So something like "her sister" can work for these characters (except that you immediately use that one next in the sentence, so don't repeat it that close together).

>Celestia had to suppress a sort of laughter.//

I assume you meant snort.

>fine - she//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs and asides. There's a guide to them at the top of this thread. There are also brief guides for LUS and comma usage with conjunctions, since I already touched on those topics. There's one in the synopsis as well.

>since she'd carried out her clever plan, and since//

Watch the repetitive word use.

>Celestia stamped her hoof//

You just had a guard do that a few paragraphs ago.

>she hadn't been asked to come and settle a single petty dispute all day//

I don't follow. Luna would only bother her if she felt she wasn't up to the task. That doesn't mean she actually is up to the task, so the fact that nobody's interrupted her doesn't guarantee Luna's doing a good job.

>Perfect for organizing.//

She already concluded this:
>This place really needs some organization.//

>she suddenly realized how untidy it was.//

And now she's going over this a third time?

>Her books were strewn all over the floor, her kitchen walls were splotched with stains and streaks of unidentifiable substances, and her desk was covered with heaps of disorganized papers.//

I don't see what the passive voice accomplishes here, and it's costing you "to be" verbs. Say you wrote "Her books lay scattered all over the floor" for the first part and used similarly active phrasing for the rest. It has a lot more energy that way.

>She felt appalled that she had existed in these conditions for so long without even noticing.//

You've been pretty good about this so far, but it's bland to just say she's feeling a strong emotion. The limited narration should give me direct access to her thoughts on it, not just in the word choice, but the tone. Write it as something she might say out loud. Something like: "How could she have existed in these conditions for so long?"

>So her next activity was to be organizing, then.//

And a fourth time. It's like you're desperately afraid the reader won't pick up on this.

>sitting neatly in the very back of the drawer, sat//

Repetitive choice of verbs there.

>Rainbow Dash.//

About time we got to this. You've spent nearly a quarter of the story on a plotline that's pretty irrelevant and not at all indicated by the synopsis. If you cut everything up to now and simply replaced it with "Celestia was looking to de-clutter her room," what would really be lost? We'll see if the sickness element ends up being important, but I'm guessing it won't.

>Oh, she hadn't thought about these for a long, long time...//

Based on the synopsis, she got the last one less than a year ago, which isn't exactly a long, long time.

Now that you're having Celestia go through an exhaustive description of Rainbow Dash, you're getting really heavy on the "to be " verbs again.

>but also to be able to understand the more contradictory aspects of her personality//

Why is Dash the only one she asked? Celestia found them all intriguing, and I'd argue Rarity is the character who has the most self-contradictory traits. You have kind of a thin excuse for choosing Dash, except that it's necessary for the plot. Delve into what catches Celestia's interest.

>Okay, ummmmmm...//

Keep in mind this is something she's written, not spoken. Yet you have a distinctly speech-related affectation here. Actually inscribing three dots on the page is a far more deliberate thing than trailing off while speaking. You don't really see it in formal letters, just ones where someone's trying to be cutesy.

>(but I'm not going to make a habit of it!)//

Because the exclamation mark is inside the parentheses, you never really gave the sentence end punctuation. So stick a period or something after this.

>crinkles engrained in the paper//

How did they ever get crinkled? Didn't she fold them back up before storing them? Or did she just unceremoniously jam them in the drawer?

>next letter//

>next few letters//
Kind of repetitive.

>Dear Princess//

Needs a comma or colon, and why didn't Dash have a closing on this letter?

>Oh, horsefeathers. I forgot. Sorry.//

Here's another affectation that doesn't work with letters. Keep in mind what I said about the ellipsis before. If Dash feels like she messed this up, then why not get a clean sheet of paper and start over? The fact that she sent these errors means she wanted Celstia to see them, or at least didn't mind if she saw. It certainly doesn't feel like a foot-in-the-mouth thing where she has to hastily correct herself and hope Celestia doesn't care or notice. What works for spoken dialogue doesn't necessarily work for articles of writing, and you're losing the sense of authenticity these letters have when you do something that real letter-writers wouldn't.

>She's my best friend.//

I'd kind of like to see more justification of this. She's known Fluttershy the longest, and she hangs out with Pinkie a lot, too. I don't know that there's clear canon evidence these two are best friends. Not that you can't come up with a case for it, but you haven't done so. You just want me to take your word for it. Building up a past for them is similar to building up a romance (which, incidentally, you're also trying to do). Maybe you'll do this later on, but I'll go ahead and say that one of the best ways to do this, short of taking me through flashback scenes, is to work by anecdote. Have her give me a few one- or two-sentence blurbs about good times they've had together.

>Next, she'd felt... pride.//

Just naming her emotions isn't going to be very engaging. You want the reader feeling them along with her, so it's better to demonstrate them. Give me imagery of how they make her feel, physical sensations, evocative word choice and phrasing.

>already knowing what it said but eager to read it again anyway; to share once more in the happiness of her most loyal subject.//

You should be able to replace a semicolon with a period and have both sentences stand as complete, but what comes after it here couldn't. A comma or dash would work fine.

>you...and//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>She kissed me.//

This is very cliched, that once a secret crush is revealed, it is immediately reciprocated.

>Earth Pony//

Why'd you capitalize that? You didn't with "pegasus."

>All of a sudden//

Really consider whether it's necessary to say something is sudden. If you write it well, it'll come across as sudden anyway. Assuring the reader it is sudden is like promising a joke is funny. If you have to say so, it probably isn't.

>Luna smiled to herself; Tia was such a horrible faker.//

You've skipped over to Luna's perspective for a single sentence. I wouldn't advise shifting it anyway, but if it's necessary, then it's certainly worth staying there longer. There's a section on head hopping at the top of this thread that explains why it's a bad idea to jerk the perspective around abruptly. You go back and forth every paragraph or two around here.

>She just wanted to get back to reading those letters!//

Why can't she read letters while feeling ill? I don't see why they're mutually exclusive. She can still act sick while reading them. It's not like that's going to make Luna any more or less suspicious.

>All thoughts of organizing had long been forgotten.//

Remember your limited narration. Celestia essentially is the narrator. If she's forgotten, then so has the narrator. And if the narrator's forgotten, he can't know this to say it.

>Well, I did it. I asked Applejack out on a date.//

After admitting her love and kissing (and possibly more), asking her on a date is really a source of stress? That's tough to buy. Why would Applejack possibly turn her down at this point?

>Applejack can't fly//

She's been up there before, though. There are ways.

>As soon as I got to her house, it started to rain.//

She's on the weather crew. How would she not know this was scheduled? It's not hard to come up with a reason why, but you don't even attempt one, which begs the question.

>suspiciously//

I don't know what perspective this is, since Celestia wouldn't think this, but nobody else is there.

>(what? Princesses like to see their subjects get their happy endings)//

Once again, you're implying an audience you've never defined and that the narrative doesn't support.

>I'd only be allowed to go back to Ponyville for a few days a year. I'd never see Fluttershy, or Twilight, or Pinkie Pie, or Rarity.//

I'm assuming you wrote this before "Top Bolt" came out. That, or you're just ignoring it. It's also a cliched thing to do this "leaving town means never seeing any of her friends ever again." The Wonderbolts seem to have plenty of time for other pursuits, and Cloudsdale isn't that far from Ponyville anyway.

>how she'd adopted Scootaloo as her little sister//

If she's adopted, wouldn't that make her a daughter? That'd be the legal relationship.

>Earth pony and Pegasus//

You're inconsistent at how you capitalize races, and particularly for "earth pony," if you only capitalize the "earth," it makes it refer to our planet.

>leather//

As in the tanned skin of dead sentient cows?

>This was actually due to an Earth pony custom//

Keep in mind Celestia's supposed to be reminiscing here. Isn't this the kind of thing she would have already known? It sounds like you're explaining it for the reader's benefit, not Celestia's.

>Once you put them on, you were never supposed to take them off unless you absolutely had to//

Kind of obtrusively addressing the reader here.

>Pegasi had a similar custom: They presented their partner with a single one of their wing feathers, which were then pressed onto a wedding band just like the Earth ponies'.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>Sadly, Applejack didn't have wings//

That comes across as a value judgment that Applejack is somehow inferior.

>partially because there hadn't actually been a wedding between an Earth pony and a pegasus in centuries//

This really doesn't seem to be supported by canon either. It wasn't seen as shocking when Big Mac revealed his crush on Sugar Belle, a unicorn. The Cakes have both unicorns and pegasi in their family tree no more than a couple generations back. There really isn't that much romance to draw on from the show, but what's there doesn't suggest this, nor is it required for your plot to work. YMMV, and I won't make you change it, but it does seem odd, like it's adding pointless tension that doesn't lead anywhere.

>Applebloom//

Apple Bloom

Okay, I get why you're telling this whole wedding scene as an after-the-fact summary. Celestia's there reminiscing, and we get her memory of it. There's no dialogue, because Celestia wouldn't be able to remember it word for word well enough to present it as such. Too many authors don't get that. But a lot of the story's emotional context comes from this wedding scene, and it's emotionally detached when we get it all as narration, with nothing of it occurring "live," as you have it here. Plus it gets a little obtrusive how much you have to use past perfect tense. I think this would carry much more power as a flashback scene, where we'd be transported to the past and see it as it happens, complete with scenery, action, and dialogue.

>Shortly after the wrestling match the sun had set//

And Celestia's not going to remark on being the one to do it? You make it sound like it happened on its own.

>squeal of enthusiasm and a fervent embrace. The Cutie Mark Crusaders had danced together, bouncing up and down and squealing//

Watch that close repetition.

>Applejack herself had been called to play the fiddle//

Again, this is something I won't make you change, since there's no harm in adding to her repertoire, but in the show, she's seen playing a banjo and an acoustic guitar. It might mesh better if you used one of those.

>She has not heard one word from Rainbow Dash since then//

Why'd you switch to present tense?

>now she would never know//

This isn't true.

And of course right as Celestia is sad she hasn't received a letter in a year, another one comes in an act of utter plot convenience. There's an old principle of writing: it's fine to have a coincidence get you into trouble, but it's weak to have a coincidence get you out of trouble. Or to word it another way, coincidence is fine for causing problems but poor for resolving them.

>So that was why Rainbow Dash hadn't written in so long.//

Huh? I don't get it. Rainbow couldn't write anytime during the pregnancy? Why not? It's not like Celestia never makes it to Ponyville or sees the Elements. She would have noticed. There's no justification for why Celestia would just now be learning of this. Heck, this is very explicitly the question the synopsis asks, and we don't get a satisfactory answer.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2840

>>2839
So, I will say that the writing wasn't bad, and the premise is cute. I don't mind indulging in a guilty pleasure and enjoying a fluffy romance. That said, it should be clear what the bigger problems were, but I'll sum them up.

The wedding scene is what really carries the emotional weight. Receiving the letter at the end is more the climax, but the wedding is what invests that one with it power, but it's hard to have a scene be emotionally engaging when we're getting a recap of it instead of the play-by-play account. I think a flashback would work better, and if you're concerned that having just the one flashback will make it feel out of place (for that matter, I don't think it would), you can put in a couple of short ones about Dash's interactions with Celestia. More on this in a moment.

You do a good job of demonstrating emotion instead of informing of it, at least when the stakes are low, but when emotions run high, you tend to tell me directly how characters feel. The purpose of the story is to make the reader feel like he's a witness to these events, and knowing that Celestia was sad is a conclusion, one that the reader can reach through proper evidence of it, and doing it that way feels more like real life. You have to interpret cues from other people's behavior to deduce how they feel most of the time, so doing it that way in writing as well can be more realistic.

I'm not going to rehash the specific events, but just note places where I felt things didn't mesh with the show very well. It'd help to make them conform better or do something to explain why they're different.

The subplot about Celestia feigning illness never goes anywhere, yet it takes up a significant portion of the beginning of the story. That's a lot of wasted verbiage, and the reader may well wonder if he's in the correct story, as it's not even hinted at in the synopsis.

In a couple of places, you seem to be addressing an audience, but none is ever established, implicitly or otherwise.

Dash does several things that real people just don't do in letters, and it harms the story's authenticity when they don't feel like real letters.

A number of cliches crop up. Not that cliches can't be written well, but it takes viewing them from an unusual angle, yet this story plays out like the majority of shipping stories on FiMFiction do. A confesses a long-held crush to B, who either admits the same or, if she hadn't considered it before, immediately decides she loves A back. Do something different with it. You can't write the same story everyone else is writing and hope it'll stand out.

Lastly, I never bought into what interest the characters have in each other. This goes for the couple, as well as Celestia's interest in Dash. I said I'd come back to that part, and a couple pf flashbacks or anecdotes might help flesh out why Celestia chooses Dash in particular to focus her attention on. But you really do need to work on what Applejack and Dash love about each other, as what's here is incredibly vague. I'll just refer to to Aragon's blog posts again to read up on how you really make a couple feel like they belong together. It takes thinking about what each one finds endearing about the other, what makes each think the other is good relationship material, and what each will contribute to and get out of a romance, among other things.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2842

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I will tell you of a history only god and I know.//

When you're referring to "god" and not something made generic like "a god," it's customary to capitalize it.

>flatout//

flat out

>Hey Somnia I forgot my homework//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>She twisted her head away from Momo, “I//

You've got a non-speaking action punctuated as if it's a speech tag.

>You know Momo//

Without a comma for direct address, she's saying that Momo is acquainted with herself. You're missing lots of such commas, and I'm not going to continue marking them.

>In a sudden//

In a sudden what?

>Gasping for air//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>On the bed laid a young pony of lavender color, just about to awake.//

You need "lay" and "awaken."

>and scanned the room. Before her eyes had traversed the entire room//

That sure makes it sound like she looked over the whole room, but then you skip back and say she didn't. You don't want hiccups like that in the writing.

>pattern: Long strands of hair, braided together and finished with a ribbon.//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>While waiting, Violet nervously tapped her hoof on the floor while looking around the hallway.//

Repetitive use of "while" phrases.

>until Violet became visible through the gap//

This is from the perspective of someone inside the room, not Violet.

>steps, the squeaking of the door hinges easily drowned out the sound of her steps//

Watch that close word repetition, like the "steps" here. This problem keeps popping up.

>the underwhelming nature of Violet's grand entry calmed their enthusiasm//

And that's from some sort of collective class perspective. It also over-explains things. You usually shouldn't be spelling out character motivations or intentions. Let the characters' actions and dialogue imply all that.

>As soon as the bell fulfilled its usual job of signaling the end of this period, a circle of ponies gathered around Somnia's table. As they approached her, their eyes filled with sparkles.//

You've started consecutive sentences with "as" clauses.

>but realized it was best to make way for the transfer student//

How does Violet know this? You're using her perspective, but the narration is telling me their thought processes.

>an earring in both her ears//

This makes it sound like there's a single earring going through both ears. A more normal phrasing would be "earrings in both her ears" or "an earring in each of her ears," though the latter is still a little strange-sounding, unless you went on to say they weren't a matched pair.

In this scene, Somnia doesn't sound too bad, but Rose's dialogue doesn't sound natural. It sounds forced, like a script for something that's not too concerned with realistic character portrayal.

>towards the big gate at the front of the school to trot back towards//

More repetition. I haven't been marking all of these.

>It was hard to believe that any pony would make the effort to search for her after the school was over, instead of just walking home and meeting at school again the next day.//

This implies she'd expect them to want to see her the next day, but given how self-deprecating she tends to be, I'm not sure she would.

>This is Azure Marina, you might have seen her before in class.//

You have a fair number of comma splices like this.

>Rose continued, “you//

Capitalization.

>Violet held back a laugh.//

This is just an example of a larger problem. She sounds like she's actually starting to enjoy herself here, yet the narration, which is in her perspective, sounds so bland. It's just not very expressive, for the most part. The but of her waiting outside the classroom on the first day wasn't bad, but everything's so sterile and lifeless. Put some energy into it. Use imagery, simile, metaphor. Give me some rich descriptions of the setting, especially what's appropriate for the situation. Like that first day in class. It's a new room for Somnia, so surely she'd look it over, and the things her eyes linger on would reveal bits of her character, or possibly become symbolic. Yet I really get no description of the room. Compare this to the details we get when she's taken to Amber's place in chapter 2. On the whole, the story feels like it's just giving me a "this happens, then this happens, then this happens" list instead of evoking any imagery or emotion from the experience.

>under way//

underway

>But I'm gonna say it's correct!//

Since I don't even know what she was trying to answer, I can't tell if there's a joke here. If so, I don't get it.

>There were plenty of other ponies around that would be glad to help her out and support her//

Early on, she assumed nobody would care about her, and now this? When did her attitude change? That's a pretty major shift, one that's worth showing in the story.

>everypony!” The teacher yelled//

Capitalization.

>Violet just swung her head around from left to right, bouncing it off the wall//

She's... bouncing her head off the wall? That sounds like it'd hurt. And why are the other students just letting her do it?

>edge of city//

Missing word.

>As she crossed a bridge over the Kami river on the edge of city//

Same missing word, and this is the third straight sentence to begin with an "as" clause.

>the end of the school year was drawing closer each day//

Why is she thinking this in past tense?

>everything was going to come to end//

Missing word.

>midst//

You need "amid" here.

>In a sudden//

Same as before. That's not a phrasing I've ever heard.

>Sorry for bringing up here//

Missing word.

>she replied, “no//

Capitalization.

>It sounded from the other room.//

I'm not sure what "it" refers to here.

>At multiple points it seemed like Violet was just about to say something, but she instead kept silent.//

Seemed to whom? You've moved out of Violet's perspective.

>Violet, who already had a bleak look on her face.//

How can she see her own face to describe it as such?

>Violet stopped listening halfway through Amber's speech//

Then why does the narrator in her perspective deliver the whole speech? They're the same person. If Amber didn't hear some of it, neither did the narrator.

>you might-”//

Use a proper dash.

>only its tail waggled from side to side, while his entire face remained completely stiff.//

You're wavering between using masculine and neuter pronouns for Kiubee.

>I don't think it would be wise to just drag here into this//

>I didn't think you'd actually join as after everything that happened//
Typos.

>An awkward silence laid over the three//

lay

>Violet only now noticed that all this time Amber hasn't changed the expression on her face once.//

A lot of this scene's perspective had seemed to be in... well, I couldn't tell who, but either Amber or Rose. But this is definitely shifted to Violet's. It's also gone to present tense.

>limitations of that ability is//

Plural/singular mismatch: limitations is.

>by-”//

Use a dash for cutoffs.

Chapter 2 is where I stopped last time, and I'm going to stop here again. The writing isn't bad, but it's just pretty lifeless. I see in your comment that you eliminated a lot of inner dialogue, but I think that's really what the story needs, as long as it makes sense for the perspective. Like don't give me inner dialogue of multiple characters, unless you're going to rewrite the whole thing with an omniscient narrator. And that inner dialogue shouldn't be presented as quoted thoughts, either. Just let the narration speak it for her, unless it needs to be stated in first person. Inner dialogue is precisely what limited narration is for, so take advantage of it.

Beyond that, you do need a fair amount of editing help, too.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2845

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Earth Ponies//

Why is this the only race you're capitalizing? The standard is to leave them all lower-case.

>ponies turned Equestria into a grand kingdom and a particular occupation became commonplace.//

You have two distinct subject-verb pairs, so they're separate clauses. You'll normally put a comma between clauses. But this sentence is phrased very strangely. It makes it sound like there was only one job that became commonplace, and that you're about to name it. But then you don't say anything. Even taking it that you mean all jobs became commonplace, that's also a strange thought. I can't imagine that being the case.

>This is the story of how I became a great hero.//

It's really strange to have these two scenes be so disconnected, since they're so short. The second presumes that Twilight's either recording the story or relating it to an audience, so is she doing that in the first scene, too? If so, it's jarring to have that context added afterward, and if not, then it's weird to have this one little scene that's not like any other, when it easily could have been, and the difference doesn't add anything.

Let me back up to the synopsis for a moment. It's awfully long, and I have to think you could get away with less. You're just trying to tell me what the story is about, not give me a scene of it. What you have in your short description is just fine. Also look how many one-line paragraphs are in the synopsis. That screams over-dramatization. Single-line paragraphs add emphasis, and when everything's emphasized, nothing is.

Now that I'm in the first actual chapter, the first thing I notice is that there's a lot of repetition. This happens in two ways. The first is on the word level.

>Night Light looked//

>Velvet looked//
>Velvet looked//
>Velvet was looking//
This is all on the first screen. Aside from the most absolutely mundane words, you want to avoid repeating them in a close space. The more unusual the word, the longer you ought to go before reusing it, since it'll stick in the reader's mind more easily. Unless, of course, the repetition is intentional, but then the key is to make it obvious that it's on purpose. That's not what you're doing in this case, though, so that's a topic for another day.

Now, the other kind of repetition I see already. Imagine taking out every sentence that contains dialogue, even if dialogue is only part of the sentence. Look at what's left. I count only 5 sentences in the entire first scene that start with anything but the subject. Many of them are about the same length. Many of them have the same inflection. At least having the dialogue interspersed helps break things up, but it still gets very plodding, like reading a list of actions.

Most of your sentences will probably end up starting with the subject, but you need to avoid having a bunch of them in a row. Throw in something different every few sentences, and work on varying the length and rhythm by tossing in some different structures, like dependent clauses and participial phrases.

And a few odd notes on detailed things.

It's strange to have them refer to Celestia as something like "the mare" several times before using her name. They know who she is, but the avoidance of using her name suggests they don't. And then the narration suddenly switches to calling her by name.

>Awes went through the crowd.//

That's just awkwardly phrased.

>the sun had just peaked into the sky//

You're confusing "peak" with "peek."

>Truly, she was as radiant as the sun she commanded.//

Your first scene is mostly in an omniscient viewpoint, but here, you have the narrator expressing one of the characters' opinions on her behalf. So you've switched to a limited narration now, in Twilight's perspective. You really should keep to one consistent type of narration until you gain enough experience to play tricks like that and make them work.

>Everypony-save for Moondancer-laughed.//

Please use proper dashes for interruptions and asides. Alt+0151 on the keypad will produce one.

>blank flank//

I'm guessing Twilight was about 4 in the first scene, so she's 14 now and still a blank flank? That seems awfully late.

>T-there’s//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. That word doesn't have a "t" sound in it.

>I can’t in good consciousness//

conscience

The scene where the doctor won't sign Twilight's form is a symptom of a larger problem where you absolutely blast through things. This should be a pretty emotionally charged moment, but there's not much description, setting, evocative behavior... This is a huge blow to Twilight's hopes for her future, but it doesn't dwell on her reaction at all. Seven paragraphs, and it's over. Compare to the scene before it where Sunset is verbally abusing Twilight. It still skimps on setting and Twilight's reaction, but at least it draws out what Sunset does. Really, the whole point of the story is what impact the events have on the characters, so make sure you're conveying that and not rushing on to the next scene.

>Your highness//

That whole term is an honorific, so it should be capitalized.

>“Please,” She whimpered.//

You occasionally have this problem where you capitalize a speech tag.

>P-p-princess//

As a title attached to a name, this word would have to be capitalized anyway. so capitalize every instance of its first letter in the stutter.

>T-thank//

Same issue as before with which sound she'd actually repeat.

>alot//

That should be two words. There is no such word as this.

>But, the other reason//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>The Element’s power//

She's referring to more than one of them, yet she's using a singular possessive.

>pegasi guards//

Noun adjuncts are singular, even when the term is plural. For instance, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

Now in the fight with Spike, you have a couple of very jerky perspective shifts between Twilight and Celestia.

>Its serpentine eyes//

That's a strange word choice, as "serpentine" means winding the vast majority of the time.

>It unclenched its claw and Sunset fell to the ground.//

You have a number of spots like this where there's a separate verb for each subject, so you have two clauses (It unclenched... and Sunset fell...), so use a comma before the conjunction.

>all you magic//

Typo.

>S-sunset//

Another stutter where the capitalization should persist.

>Aura exploded off Twilight.//

Unless "aura" is jargon from the crossover material that gets used in phrasings like this (I'm not familiar with it), you're missing a word.

>with a heavy accent//

You've already made that apparent in the dialogue. You don't need to repeat it in the narration.

>what she vants//

Note that you're inconsistently applying his accent.

There's not a bad story in here, but you've got a number of stylistic issues fighting it. I've already discussed them, but I'll sum them up here:

-Some editing issues.
-Repetition.
-Often a lack of character emotional investment in what's happening.
-Jumpy perspective.
-Lack of description leaves many scenes feeling pretty bare.
-Many of the scenes are rushed.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2850

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>It was a pleasure doing business with you and I know the Princesses will feel the same once I deliver the news.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>the hotel he was staying at//

That's a bit of a clunky phrasing. Why not just "his hotel"?

>“Alright, Spike,” he said aloud to himself, “time to remind Celestia why you were chosen as the ambassador of Equestria.”//

This is the only sentence we get between him getting to his room and the text of the letter. It's rather abrupt. Doesn't he freshen up a bit? Get some paper? Find a pen? It just sounds unnatural.

>I’ve heard legends of a distant planet called “Earth.”//

This is really out of place. You're not trying to write a metafic or allude to space travel or anything. I won't make you drop the joke, but it immediately removed my enthusiasm for the story.

>Anywho//

An odd expression for Celestia to use, since it's a very vernacular way of saying "anyhow."

>Our current treaty on the gems that border our land and theirs is coming to an end and it’s of utmost importance you work out a new deal.//

Needs a comma.

>The white mare//

You're telling the story in Spike's perspective. Is this really how he'd choose to refer to her? People don't think about friends in such external and formal ways.

>But, you have to let me pay.//

It's rarely correct to put a comma after a conjunction. This one is not.

>before laying back into his bed//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight.

>But, that was a nice dream.//

Same deal with the comma after a conjunction. You should scan for these, as I'm not going to mark them all.

> I believe Equestrian’s celebrate it every year at this time.//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>Love,

>
>Your friend, Celestia//
Why is she putting two closings on the letter?

>The sound of train horns and hot metal filled his nostrils//

Hot metal makes sounds? Or he has the sound of train horns in his nose? I'm not sure how to take this.

>days worth//

days' worth

The narration is starting to get a fairly repetitive feel. Here's an example paragraph:
>Spike nodded before running off toward the designated train. He handed his ticket to the conductor and found a seat. He slouched back and closed his eyes. He felt so stupid. But, there was no time to feel sorry for himself. He had only one thought on his mind.//
Look at how the same structure keeps repeating. All but one sentence starts with the subject. They're all fairly short. 4 of the 6 start with "he," and yet another starts with him as well, in name form. It just loses its flow when it does that.

>onto important matters//

"On to" needs to be separate words here, as it changes the meaning.

>Spike chuckled gave up a toothy grin.//

Phrasing is jumbled.

>I’ know//

Why is that apostrophe there?

>Twilight has pretty much locked herself up in the castle//

Why in the world did this happen? It smacks of convenience, and it never gets explained.

>“I’d love to, Spike,” Rarity pulled her eyes up to meet his.//

You've punctuated that like it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

>So, is it a date?//

The problem here is we just get told they're together, but it's not really justified. I'll revisit this at the end.

>A few other passengers on the train squinted their eyes in annoyance at being woken up//

From what? His yawn? They must be incredibly light sleepers.

>“Excuse me, Miss?” He said//

"Miss" only gets capitalized when it's attached to a name, and you've capitalized your speech tag.

>plastered on//

You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>continue onto the next car//

Same issue with "on to" being two words. "Onto" literally means "on top of."

>He looked at the doors directly in front of him, then glanced back at the doors on the side of the car. “The south doors, right…”//

How is this confusing? There are only two possible directions.

>where the hostess was at//

Don't ever end a sentence with "at." In most cases, you can just remove it without harming the syntax at all.

>“Will four creams be enough for ya?” She asked//

Speech tag capitalization again, and so far, you're only getting it wrong when the dialogue ends in a question mark. This used to be an issue with GDocs, so I don't know if that's what's going on here.

This conversation with the waitress is a prime spot for some anecdotes, but I'll get to that later when I wrap up the shipping discussion.

>between you and I//

between you and me

>Yes or no.?//

Extraneous punctuation.

>there’s a mare out there that loves you//

When referring to sentient creatures, it's preferred to use "who" instead of "that."

>when Rarity, came down the aisle//

Why is that comma there?

>It’s true//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>We’ve now arrived at Ponyville!//

You mentioned the trip having multiple layovers, yet none of that ever happened. He boarded a train, slept, ate, slept, and got off the train.

>it was as if nothing changed from all the years he’d lived there//

Well, he'd already said exactly this:
>“Some things never change.”//

>When he finally made it into town//

Look at the number of "to be" verbs in this paragraph. It's bogging the story down. It wouldn't be hard to rephrase most of this with active verbs, and it makes a story more interesting to read, since active verbs make things happen.

>business takes him away longer than he wishes//

You're in present tense again.

Frankly, that ending was obvious right from the start, but that doesn't mean it's badly done. I do have a few issues.

Spike keeps setting up that Rarity is going to be angry with him, but there's never any reason given why. Not that they didn't get along well, not that she'd actually ever gotten angry with him before. And as it turns out, I doubt she has. That part feels manufactured.

I guess Platinum is related to Rarity? I'm not sure, but it seemed to be implied, yet it's hard to believe she wouldn't have immediately known who Spike was, then.

I'm not sure why this holiday is so important. I'd guess it's either the anniversary of their wedding or her death, but it could be their first date or something. The story never says.

The trick to this kind of ending is to have it add new meaning to the story, but aside from an "oh, okay" moment, it doesn't add new context. It doesn't change how Spike feels, since he obviously already knew, but it doesn't change anyone else either. It's less like a story with a twist to it and more like story that just exists to have that twist in it. Usually this would involve some other character experiencing growth, since all the important stuff has already happened for Spike, unless he reaches a new understanding or something. But the twist comes and goes, and the story never really concludes anything from it.

Now, about the shipping. This is a common issue for shipping stories, and for the long version, I'll refer you to the blog posts that Aragon has written on the subject and linked from his homepage. The short version is that it's not enough just to tell me they love each other. You have to demonstrate it and establish what the basis for it is.

A good way of doing that is by anecdote, and you tried to do that by showing some past events, but look at what we really get from each one. That they got married, but that's a given, and it's pretty generic. That they went out on a first date, which is getting warmer, but still not there. That they'd hung out before dating, which is also a nice character moment. But here's the thing that's missing: I don't know why either of them is in love. They agree to go on a date, they agree to get married, but the only reason I have to think they're in love is because the narrator says so.

What is it that Spike actually likes about her? Details of her personality, things she does that he finds endearing, how she's compatible with him. Those are the kinds of things you want the anecdotes to show. People each give and take from a relationship, and they believe that the other person does the same. So what does she have that he sees as good relationship material, not just that she's attractive, but that she's the kind of companion he could see enjoying for many years? He's in a unique position to tell me that, but I never get it.

That has to come from her side as well, though we obviously can't hear it directly from her now. In anecdotes, though, she can say what she likes about him, what leads her to believe he's good relationship material in general and for her specifically. Plus he can read the signs from her that she's happy. My investment in the story is going to be driven by how much he loves her, and all I have to go on is the narrator's assurance that he does, without much evidence to demonstrate it.

When I'm convinced they're truly in love, then it means so much more when she dies. Without that piece, it's still tragic, but no more so than any other of his friends, so you're singling her out without proving she warrants that.

And creating a vibrant relationship (to be sure, a relationship should be built with the same care as a character and can almost be considered one), is what really brings life to a romance story. That's how you stand out against the crowd of all the other "dead lover" stories out there. If you can add that piece, then you'd have something here.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2852

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>‘Tura//

You have an opening quote there, not an apostrophe.

>“Reschedule one or two things”.//

>“The Country Tourer”.//
Period goes inside the quotes. There are times you can make the argument that it wasn't part of the quote, but these aren't exactly quotations. You're not putting a comma before them like they're speech.

>Coloratura tried to meet her half-lidded eye, and found she simply couldn’t.//

No need for a comma there. It's all one clause.

>Tain’t//

Could use an apostrophe on the front as well, since you're clipping it short there.

>doncha//

Usually spelled don'tcha.

>Fancypants//

His canon name is two words.

>ever-so-slightly//

No need for those hyphens.

>he half-lidded, smiling face of Cherry Jubilee//

This is already the third time in the chapter you've described her eyes like this.

>her crushed swirl//

>ripped a chunk off//
It's subtle, but these don't quite work with how you described it as "mushy."

Well, I have to admit to being confused at the end of chapter 1. There's a story about Cherry trying to help Rara out, and then we go into a couple of flashbacks where she attempts to chew out Sven and... well, get Cherry's help yet again. At least that was the first time, so it's a significant event, but then there isn't any contrast drawn between the two. I don't get a sense that they're really all that different, that Rara has grown as a character at all in between. Yeah, we're early in the story, and I'm sure you'll fill in that character arc, but it's really static so far. You make a point of comparing the past to the present, but she hasn't changed any. You'd have a more compelling first chapter if there was some movement on that front, but it feels like nothing but setup, and it's a fairly large percentage of the story expended to have the nature of the conflict so nebulous still. I don't really even know what it's about yet. Rara's miserable while trying to make it without Sven, and... that's it. That's kind of vague, and I don't know anything more about what she wants, much less see her taking steps to get it.

I've had overnight to stew on it, and I'll elaborate a little more. There are a couple of avenues for conflict set up: she's mad at Svengallop, she's being comforted by Cherry, and there's something about Denim, yet I can't tell whether she's concerned about Denim's well-being or sees her as a rival. So after a chapter and a third of the way through the story, I still don't know what the chief conflict or struggle is going to be.

The beginning of chapter 2 is confusing as far as perspective is concerned. Chapter 1 ends in Rara's viewpoint, and while it's fair game to change perspectives at chapter breaks, you want to make it immediately evident you've done so, or the reader will assume it hasn't shifted. So when you start with "She kept up the good sleeping regime for three days, and then bad habits ambushed her again," it would appear to be Rara's thought. Then midway through the third sentence it seems like Cherry is the viewpoint character because some of the subject matter in the second sentence. It's not until the last sentence of the second paragraph that the perspective is obvious. You don't want me having to hit the speed bump of reinterpreting the first couple sentences once the shift is clear. It's a bad idea for the first reference to a character in a scene be by pronoun anyway, since they work by antecedent, and in that situation, there isn't one.

>It didn’t really seem to be hurting any pony.//

Seems like that "any pony" would be one word, like "anyone."

>get in the way when I was trying to get into//

Kind of repetitive phrasing.

>Never had he found himself surrounded by so many wide and eager eyes.//

This is Rara's reminiscence, yet she seems to be reading Shill's mind here. You don't normally flash back into any perspective but your own.

For that matter, these flashbacks go on long enough that it's probably better to segue into them and set them off as separate scenes, leaving them in regular font. It gets irritating to read this much italics. They're not for extended passages.

>she went along with it first//

Usually, I see that phrased as "at first."

>seemed as certain and solid as he did now. No one else seemed//

Repetitive word choice.

>I felt a hundred hands tall!//

That doesn't seem plausible as a unit of measure. First off, not many races have hands, and second, those who do aren't in charge of the ponies, so why would that be the standard?

>special//

>pestle//
That's a pretty weak rhyme.

>And turned my tongue towards the art//

You're a syllable short on that one.

>With sweet, divine, enchanting melodies.//

You just used "enchanting" two lines ago, and it's not evident as a thematic repetition.

>Flowing words now kept me tall,

>Kept me from the reaper’s fall
>Crashing down to fading darkness,
>Gave me heart when I was heartless.//
Okay, now look at this stanza. The first couplet is a syllable short per line, but you have a different stress pattern. It looks like you alternate stanzas where the lines start with stressed or unstressed syllables, but especially on the stressed ones, you're inconsistent at using 7 or 8 syllables per line. And this line especially:
>Changing my dark soul inside://
Has a really forced stress pattern. You're trying to emphasize that word to stomp it into the pattern, but it doesn't fit.

>Had me possessed; the ghost was my Countess!//

And this stress pattern is way off. Plus it's another weak rhyme.

>And now my roots grew back across the distance,

>And I was saved by my own reminiscence…//
It's not a sonnet, but I suppose that doesn't mean you can't have female rhyme. At least you do it in both lines. Except you do it again the next two times you have an isolated couplet. The idea behind female rhyme is that it's only an occasional thing.

>charm//

>balm//
Yikes. That rhyme's a real stretch.

>Farmer’s gal who’d run away,

>Lost it all, and had to pay//
Short on syllables there again.

>forever//

Kind of weak to rhyme a word with itself.

Jeez, that song takes up four and a half screens. You know a hefty chunk of readers are just going to scroll past it, right? Readers are not very receptive to song lyrics, so you have to keep them short, preferably less than a screen, or break them up with anecdotes or something so you're only getting a little at a time. This is like having a block of exposition. It makes the action grind to a halt.

>Turns out wizards have a weakness//

Now you're breaking the pattern of alternating stanzas that stress or unstress the first syllable of each line. Counting where she left the song off before, you now have two stanzas in a row that begin stressed.

>My horizon! My heartsong!//

That rhythm is off.

It seems a little odd that we go to Silver Shill's reminiscence in flashback form, which necessitates being in his perspective, from an scene that was in Rara's perspective, but I guess that can't be helped, unless you don't show it in flashback mode.

And at the end of the second chapter, I'm still pretty mystified as to what the story's point is. Rara's clearly facing down some internal turmoil over what her role in life is to be, but I don't understand why that is or what it has to do with her breaking from Svengallop. It's not like she'd completely changed. Take how she loved doing events with the children. So I don't have a good picture of whether she's upset about who she is or if she's just upset about where her career can go from here. And since I'm now roughly 2/3 way through the story, that's not a good place for your reader to be. I mean, the writing's good, and the character voicing is vivid. I can certainly see it being engaging to the crowds on FiMFiction, but it's not holding together that well for me.

>few freckles flecked//

The alliteration creates a playful feel that doesn't really match the tone.

>“Letters,” she said quietly, “are nowhere near good enough. We need to meet up more often.”//

It's ambiguous who "she" is here. Applejack was the last character mentioned by name, though Rara is the most recent to warrant a "her." It felt more like Applejack was saying it, but then I had to backtrack when that made the dialogue exchanges off.

>“Applejack,” said Coloratura quickly, “you’re not making sense! That wasn’t your fault!”//

You're placing all your dialogue tags in that same position in the sentence. It's getting repetitive.

>She watched as Applejack sat down on the boards.//

Again, it's ambiguous who "she" is here. Applejack just had dialogue, but the last character mentioned was Cherry, and yet I get the sense this is supposed to be Rara.

>She ignored the way Applejack’s foreleg moved up to her snout, and the slight sniffs that followed.//

If she ignored them, then how did she see them?

>Cherry Jubilee gave a loud sniff and dabbed at her eyes with her neckerchief.//

I've said this several times already, and I'll wrap it up at the end, but i should be just as emotional as Cherry here, but I'm just not feeling it. It's not until this chapter that I'm really getting a picture of what's been going on the whole time, but it's still a bit vague, and it's pretty late in the story to create that investment.

>‘em//

Needs an apostrophe, not an open quote.

>far too cheesy//

Hyphenate that, since it's all a single adjective for the "smile" afterward.

>said “Good//

Missing comma.

>You’re too good to leave doin’ nothin’ but chores//

I don't understand this phrasing. My best guess is AJ's telling her that if she left and went back home to her chores, it'd be a waste. If that's what you mean, then the participial phrase "doin' nothin but chores" should be set off with commas.

>weighed down by some private misery//

How does Rara know what this is?

>“I’m saying –” she began. “Y… No.”//

This is the first time in the story you've actually gotten me invested in what happens to her, and we're about 85% of the way through. Why do I care? Because I know exactly what the conflict is that led up to this statement and witnessed her agonizing over it. That hasn't been present in the story until now.

>because they weren’t sure if she was joking or not//

Rara presumes this about AJ, but she doesn't know it. Maybe you should phrase it so. For that matter, it's better to have Rara express this directly than have the narrator say it like a middleman. It's kind of cold and factual as is, but if Rara asks herself the question, it's more personal.

>each other and tightened their grip on each other’s//

Kind of repetitive.

>“Moonlighting”, she’d said.//

Comma goes inside the quotes.

>‘em//

Needs to be an apostrophe.

>her hoof steering Coloratura//

>Coloratura let Applejack steer her//
These are just a paragraph apart.

I don't understand why you went to Cherry's perspective for the last scene. The whole thing had been in Rara's, so it's a "one of these things is not like the others" when only the final few hundred words out of 10k change from that. And we don't even learn anything vital from being there. Furthermore, Rara even comes back in, so whatever little bit of plot closure you wanted to achieve with this scene could still happen in Rara's viewpoint. It's not Cherry's character growth that the story's about, yet you make that your parting shot.

I like the story's message and how that's conveyed by Rara's decision at the end, and of course the writing is good, but my main problem with this is that it takes so long for it to go anywhere. It's not until halfway through chapter 3 that I find out exactly what Rara's issue has been all along and what she wants. So I have to wade through lots of vagaries that dance around the topic, and then all those song lyrics in chapter 2. That's an absolute death knell for a story. Many readers will tune out right there. If the actual content of the lyrics is important to understand the story or move the plot, make that abundantly clear, but for goodness' sake, keep it short or break it up into bite-size chunks.

For so much of the story, I'm in the dark about what's bothering Rara. It could be she hasn't gotten over feeling used, it could be that she's taken it on as a personal mission to help Sven's other victims, it could be she feels emptied out and doesn't know who she is anymore (though I'm glad you didn't go that way, since it'd be harder to explain why she felt she very much did know exactly who she was at the end of that episode). It could even be all three, but I could never tell what her attitude toward Denim was, and then Denim comes back up briefly a bit later before being dropped from the story entirely. So she's feeling like a Chekhov's gun: something given seeming importance that never gets used.

Then, it's not apparent why Rara seems to have taken an interest in country music. Is it necessary to scrape together enough money to make a living? It sure doesn't seem that way. Is it just because she wants to explore more kinds of music? I guess that's the case, given how it ends, but she never equates her disdain for Manehattan with a particular style of music. It's not like she's giving up on pop music, or it least it doesn't seem so. And Manehattan's not the only place to play that, so... I'm a bit stumped. Has her experience tainted her on not just the pop business but even the sound as well? Yet she doesn't seem to have latched onto anything else either. She's tried country, but she doesn't come across as enthusiastic about it, and nothing else gets mentioned. So even with all this talk at the end about her finding her own way, it seems like lip service, because she's not taking any steps to get there. Yeah, she wrote a song, but how is she going to present it? As a country song? As some other style she just never says she's interested in?

Only at the end is there anything concrete about Rara's emotional investment. She acts upset the whole way through, but it's just generic through the beginning since it's unfocused about what precisely is eating at her, and she doesn't even seem to be in turmoil about it, just a steady gloominess. Plus it's unclear what she's actually doing about it, so that she's engaged in a real struggle instead of just moping along. Not that moping can't be interesting to read, but it's tougher, and it still needs to earn buy-in from the reader about what and why and how and what stakes exist. Not to mention that the synopsis explicitly promises a struggle, while she's more numbly accepting things until chapter 3.

Like I said, this story has the good writing flow and characterization I expect from you, but it lacks much direction, and what direction it does have waits until the last minute to make an appearance. It takes a lot of trust fro a reader to push through all that (plus those song lyrics and the lengthy stretches of all italics!). I went back and skimmed chapter 1 to make sure I wasn't just missing something, as I've been known to do, but I don't see it. It's a little more evident that Rara's disappointed her country song didn't make a bigger splash and that she's relegated to the opening act at the moment, but she doesn't come across as feeling all that strongly about it, so with the benefit of hindsight, it's a little better, but not much.

I could post this on the strength of the writing and characterization alone, and I don't think anyone would call me on it. We've certainly posted lower-quality stories. But I've read enough of your stories to know what you're capable of, and you can do better than this. If it were a low-stakes SoL, that's one thing. It's not supposed to have a big payoff. But when you build the story around this wrenching emotional experience, it really does need to have that impact. So I'm going to send it back to you and see what you can do with it.

In quick bullet point fashion:
-Extended italics get irritating to read. It'd work better to segue those into flashback scenes.
-Having a single block of song lyrics go on that long is asking for lots of trouble. There were also lots of irregularities in meter, and I get it's just a rough draft she scribbled down, but it's so exacting in its irregularity that it doesn't come across as something half-formed.
-It's so late in the story before we find out what she wants and why, and a couple of false leads (namely Denim) just get dropped.
-When we do find out what she wants, it's kind of generic. Everyone wants to be loved for who they really are, so don't leave it so abstract. Give me specific examples of when she tried, how she failed, what the result was, and how that made her feel. She's speaking in generalities, and they're never going to connect with the reader as much as specifics will.
-Given how limited a narrator you're using, you don't get very expressive with Rara's emotion.
-I don't see the point at all of going to Cherry's perspective for the final scene.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2856

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>having audience with her//

Usually, that's phrased as "an" audience.

Right away, a lot of your verb choices tend toward the stagnant. You have 8 "to be" verbs in just the first 5 paragraphs. You're killing the story's momentum before it even has any. Most times, it's not hard to rephrase a lot of these things with active verbs, in the narration at least. You get leeway for dialogue, since people don't take fancy routes around such verbs, and the dialogue does need to sound natural. But as for the narration, the more active you keep it, the more interesting it is.

The beginning is also very generalized. Someone waiting to speak to Celestia is common enough that it doesn't stand out. So what can you do to make it pop? Well, look at what comes next. The narrator says she hasn't been here in a long time, and she enjoys looking around, but the detail level is so vague. If you'd just returned to a place you knew very well after being away for ages, how would you react? You'd notice lots of little details. You just mention generic things like rugs and marble floors that are stock pieces for a castle, and we don't even get a description of what any of it looks like. Impress me with how grand it is. Tie it to her personal experience. She's going to look at things that mean something to her. She doesn't just see the rug. She sees it still has the curled-up edge she used to trip on when she was young. The clock on the wall that none of the staff could ever seem to keep properly wound. A vase she remembers is gone now. Did it get broken, or had Celestia only kept it there to humor her? This is the kind of thing I'm looking for. Make this a very personal experience for the narrator, not some routine errand, since you haven't described it as one. (Actually making a routine errand interesting is a whole other topic.)

>Still, the same rugs and tapestries adorned the halls. The marble floors and walls were still//

Watch repeating a word that close.

>the guards and servants that walked the halls//

When referring to sentient beings, it's customary to use "who" instead of "that."

>Her Majesty//

That's actually a title for a queen. A princess would be Your Highness, though I'll grant you that the show seems to use them interchangeably.

>I had been waiting here for well over an hour now, standing the entire time.//

Ponies don't exactly need chairs to sit. She didn't have to remain standing.

>Though, what I had to speak with her about was no doubt an important matter.//

It's rarely correct to put a comma after a conjunction—only when there's some sort of comma-delimited element following it, like a participial phrase.

>I knew she was distraught over his disappearance.//

How so? Describe some of the reaction Clover has witnessed. Or some manner of evidence of how close they were.

>remaining friends she had left//

Redundant.

>And, Hurricane//

No reason to have that comma.

>And, I knew that I would die soon as well.//

Same thing. I can't keep noting these or I'll have a document full of them. Suffice it to say you should scan through ad likely remove any commas you have after conjunctions.

>that Luna has been gone//

Verb tense is off here.

Man, this chapter spends an inordinate amount of time on exposition. When you spend paragraphs at a time summarizing events, it doesn't give them much gravity. I have to think these summaries don't need to be as long as they are, but they're also very dry, like a history lesson. They're dwelling more on what events transpired and less on what effect that had on Clover. They're her memories, after all.

>After all, she is still maintaining Luna’s bedchambers//

That's a strange choice of tense anyway, "is maintaining" versus "maintains," but I'm not sure why it's in present. The whole narration has been in past tense, aside from one typo.

>As young and radiant as ever//

You're glossing over the kind of detail she'd use to arrive at this conclusion, the same way you glossed over the way the castle looked to her. What she notices, what she chooses to linger on, and how it makes her feel, are all very good ways to characterize her.

>The throne room had brought back too many memories, many good, some bad.//

One or two examples will always be more powerful that something vague or generalized. Give me a couple of one-sentence anecdotes about these memories. If I have no idea what they are, I'm not going to be invested in them.

>He seemed affronted.//

How so? What did he do?

>“Sir,” I spoke calmly, “If//

When you transition out of speech and back in with commas like this, the quote is implied to be one unbroken sentence, so you shouldn't capitalize "if."

>tried to suppress a laugh, but failed miserably. He instead tried//

Watch the repetition again.

>“Clover,” said she, her voice full of warmth, “It is good to see you.”//

Same capitalization problem with the dialogue. You'll have to scan the story for these.

>“Likewise,” I said, as it was.//

Yet the narration sounds so formal and stoic about it. It doesn't feel like the train of thought of someone who's happy to see an old friend.

>been…some//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts the sentence or has other punctuation after it.

>all of the ponies that//

"Who," not "that."

>whatever else garbage//

>whatever else asinine rumors//
Awkwardly phrased.

>That small smile of hers returned to her face.//

You never really said it left. You did have her expression "shift" but then "snap back into place," so it sounds like she was already smiling.

>deal with the politics here. I doubt very much you would want to deal with//

Repetitive phrasing.

To make a point, I'm going to paste in a few paragraphs' worth of narration with all the sentences of dialogue removed.

>I nodded in affirmation. I shrugged. Celestia shifted the positioning of one of her hooves slightly. That small smile of hers returned to her face. She nodded in thought. I smiled. Celestia clapped her hooves together and leaned forward. I finally broke and a gruff laugh escaped from deep within me. I smiled at her. She bobbed her head gently.//

It gets better after this, but if you read that as a paragraph like I have it here, wouldn't that feel dreadfully plodding? They're mostly short sentences with downward inflection, and they all start with the subject. It gets very structurally repetitive. The dialogue that gets mixed in helps mask the repetition, but it can only do so much. Toss in a little more variety here and there so you don't get 10 sentences in a row that are the same.

>I finally broke and a gruff laugh escaped from deep within me.//

Needs a comma between the clauses, since you have distinct subject-verb pairs: I broke, and a laugh escaped

>if this was a mere social call//

She's speaking hypothetically, so use subjunctive mood: if this were.

>“…Gone?” Was what she eventually said//

"Was" shouldn't be capitalized here. It doesn't start a sentence.

>I paused//

This is a meaningless phrase. What happens during the pause is what charges it with tension. Is she stopping to think of how to break the news? Searching for a particular word? Surreptitiously farting? Those all completely change the mood. So let me know what the mood is here.

>Celestia’s eyes met mine//

Given how much she just used "met" in the previous paragraph, this isn't a good spot to use it again so soon.

>I allowed myself a small smile.//

Both of them are doing an awful lot of smiling. It's a word authors tend to overuse.

>This is hardly proper court procedures.//

"Procedure" would be singular here.

>obviously upset//

This is already clear from his behavior. Beware over-explaining things.

>Last though, was the herald.//

You need another comma before "though."

>I gazed up at the throne.//

All these short one-sentence paragraphs... They really don't say much. Doing this is supposed to add emphasis, but when you emphasize six things in a row, then none of them really stand out. Even so, the formatting had better be justified by something important happening in them, and nothing really does.

>Yet, I had only taken the first few before, Celestia//

Neither one of those commas should be there.

>helped me up the last five steps//

Why is Celestia making an old mare walk up there? Why doesn't she come down? I get the bit about Luna's throne, but Clover didn't know Celestia was going to do that.

>alicorn that goes around//

Who, not that.

>She paused.//

Again, this is meaningless as a standalone sentence.

>Me and Celestia were now the only two left//

Celestia and I.

>one-hundred//

That's not a spot where a hyphen would go.

>the permanent scorch mark from one of Starswirl’s wayward spells on one of the walls.//

See, this is the kind of detail I was looking for earlier. Do more of this.

>know…” her voice trembled, “…I//

Here's how to format an aside in a quote. Pay attention to the capitalization and punctuation:
know—” her voice trembled “—I

>She had so much of this bottled up//

Needs a comma here.

>her wails//

This is a bit much. I realize they're alone, to where she doesn't need to keep up appearances, but still. Where sad situations are concerned, less is usually more. If you go overboard, it just comes across as maudlin, and then you lose the sense of authenticity. You don't want the story to feel emotionally manipulative.

>I paused.//

plz

>Madam//

That's not a word that would be capitalized, unless it precedes a name or title.

>I think we both knew what was to come next.//

This is the 5th sentence in a row to start with the same word.

There's some good character work in this chapter, but I can't help feeling like it's a very long wind-up before we actually get to the story the synopsis promised. It would help if you add the kinds of details I discussed earlier, since it'd increase Clover's engagement with the situation and thus feel like character development instead of a rather static explanatory chapter.

>been one of my favorite places to be//

Same as last chapter, you have a lot of "to be" verbs stagnating things right away.

>I was only a common scribe at the moment.//

This makes it sound like she knew she would be more, and we haven't gotten that sense of ambition from her.

>The most interesting that happened//

Missing word.

>The royal alchemists and the castle infirmary were always in need of fresh trimmings.//

Only 7 paragraphs into the chapter, and you already have 15 "to be" verbs, 10 of them "was."

>Canterbury Woods was a unique place.//

Seriously. Do a Ctrl-f for "was" and watch the screen light up. There are 224 of them in the chapter. That's about once every 3 sentences just for that form of the verb alone. That's how often something doesn't happen.

>some of ones back at the castle//

Missing word.

>On many occasion//

Typo.

Now you're having the same issue I noted earlier. You have so many one-line paragraphs, and you have to be more judicious about where you use emphasis like this. It just looks poorly formatted.

>grinded//

ground

Through this spot, look how calm and flat the narration is. If this were happening to you, would your internal thoughts be so organized and formal? There's a disconnect between the events and the narrative tone. For that matter, I understand that short sentences can work toward pacing and tension, but you still don't want to use nothing but that. Yet in this passage, nearly every sentence is identical in inflection and length, and it gets to be like reading a grocery list:
>Everything vanished. My vision went black. I could not feel the ground under my hooves. The forest’s aromas were gone. The silence intensified.
>
>My skin was aflame. A ringing in my ears. The bones within my body grinded against each other.//

>It was as if nothing had even happened.//

This ends a stretch of 19 consecutive one-line paragraphs. This is ridiculous. What that says to me as a reader is that you either don't have a sense of where to correctly place emphasis or you're not coming up with enough detail to fill the story out. On the word count alone, I'd say the latter isn't the issue.

>who I could now see//

whom

>He seemed somewhat surprised. Confused.//

What does he do that leads Clover to conclude this?

>surely the townsponies would know who he is//

You've switched to present tense.

>the slightest traces of nervousness trickling into my voice//

If you're nervous is your tone of voice what clues you in? Surely there are more immediate ways she'd perceive the emotion than that.

>He paused and then began again.//

This is wasted verbiage. The fact that he paused is meaningless. What gives it meaning is why he paused, usually shown indirectly through what happens during the pause. But all we get to know is that it exists.

>How could he have possibly have known that?//

And I bet you're not going to say what it is. Consider the perspective, though. We're seeing Clover's internal thoughts as narration. If the narration won't say, that implies she has a reason to avoid thinking about it, but no such motivation has been mentioned. So there's no reason for the narrator to withhold the information.

>two-hundred//

That's not the spot for a hyphen in a number. They only go between tens and ones places.

>My brain took a moment to catch-up.//

This isn't a situation where you'd hyphenate that.

>I would strongly suspect that is was because of our meeting here.//

Typo.

>“Life isn’t always fair, dear Clover. Nor is it predictable.”//

He's using direct address with her over and over. Think about how often you do so when having a one-on-one conversation. Pretty rarely. Direct address is used to get someone's attention, disambiguate to whom you're speaking, or to add emphasis. The last one is the only possibility that might apply here, but this falls under the same umbrella as all those one-line paragraphs: too much emphasis is the same as no emphasis, except that it's more irritating to read.

>trying to recollect my thoughts some//

I think you mean just "collect." "Recollect" would mean she's trying to remember them.

>All of a sudden//

You've told me things are sudden several times already. It's not the kind of thing you should have to point out. If you write it well, it will already come across as sudden. It's like having to assure the reader that a joke is funny. If it needs the explanation, it probably wasn't. You have 17 of them in the chapter, which is quite a few.

>I do not kno—” He broke off unexpectedly//

The punctuation already shows me he broke off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>“I would like to hear it, if you do not mind.”

>
>“Hmm?”
>
>“Your story?” He blinked. “Of how you got here?”//
It's ambiguous who says what here, particularly since his action is placed with her speech. I thought he was asking her how she got there, and I didn't realize I was wrong until two screens later.

>sit the boulder//

Missing word.

>sat beside him on the rock//

And you just used "sat" in the last sentence. Try to avoid close word repetition like that.

>“There!” said he, seemingly satisfied, “We may as well be comfortable while we chat, no?”//

The way you capitalized and punctuated that speech tag, it means that the two parts of the quote are one continuous sentence, yet they obviously aren't, since you put end punctuation on the first and capitalized the second.

>“Clover,” he interrupted me again, as he was wont to do, “If//

Same thing.

>who you will meet//

whom

>“Now,” he said, clasping his hooves together, “Let’s begin.//

Capitalization again. I don't know why this is suddenly turning up. Maybe you just didn't use this pattern of speech tags until now, but it's wrong regularly enough that you should scan the whole story for it.

>He trailed off into silence.//

The punctuation already tells me this.

>researching time magic for some time//

That just sound strange, like you're trying to make a joke.

>Over time//

And with this so soon after, it's just getting repetitive.

>“But eventually, I overstay my welcome, and am noticed and forced out again.//

This is the 14th straight paragraph without even a single word of narration. Not even a speech tag. This is really talking heads.

>Every time//

It's probably best to avoid expressions about time when he's actually talking about it. It comes across as you making puns.

>He had been speaking nonstop for what felt like several minutes now.//

Yeah, I know how you feel, Clover.

>snapping me from my own thoughts//

Missing punctuation.

>250//

Spell out numbers that short. You'd already been doing so anyway.

>And a pony was never meant to experience what he has//

You're using present tense again.

>Night had now fallen proper.//

You really like to use "proper" in this way. It's already the 5th time in the chapter you've done so. It's sticking out as a writing tic.

>Crickets or some other bug buzzed off in the distance.//

This isn't really ambiguous. Crickets don't buzz.

>“Thank you for telling me,” I finally said, “I would not think it easy to carry such a burden for so long.”//

Same issue with the intermediary speech tag, but it's less obvious this time. If you put the two parts of the quote together, you'd have a comma splice.

>One of his ears swiveled in my direction and then spoke//

One of his ears spoke?

>A pause.//

A meaningless sentence.

>T-thank//

Think about what sound she'd actually repeat. There isn't even a "t" sound in that word.

>I suspected it was related to his predicament.//

You don't need to state the obvious.

>“Starswirl,” My voice was low, “Are you feeli—” I broke off//

Two capitalization errors, redundant indications of breaking off.

>Here, was this stallion sitting in front of me//

No reason to have that comma.

>I tore off another chunk of bread and began eating.//

She didn't begin eating. She started that a while ago.

>his self//

himself

>two-hundred//

No hyphen.

>I did not think he had had such a chance talk with anypony//

Missing word.

>somepony who he trusted//

whom

>I gasped in amazement//

Whenever you have one of these "in/with/of emotion" phrasings, consider whether something already in the sentence conveys it, like the gasp here. If not, then consider whether it's an emotion important to the story, such that you should likewise show the character demonstrating that emotion instead of directly identifying it. You use these phrases a fair amount.

>You were the only pony that could ever match me//

Use "who."

>He then gripped me suddenly, his voice now low and serious,//

You've punctuated that like it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.

>other’s hearts//

Assuming he wants her to do this for more than one person, you need a plural possssive.

>his crystal dinged twice is rapid succession//

Typo.

And now you're doing that single-sentence paragraph thing again.

>without so much of a trace//

The phrasing is usually "without so much as."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2857

>>2856
>poured over every sentence//
pored

>I excused my behavior for that you needed to learn how to cope on your own//

That's pretty hard to parse.

For a rather long letter, it sure doesn't say much. it covers all the generic stuff you'd expect it to, but it doesn't have any sort of detail to it. That leaves it feeling very impersonal. It just keeps going back over that he loves her and time travel is dangerous. The bit about Luna is interesting, but it's odd for that to just now come up, so late in the story.

>Though it was not until very recent//

recently

>her features somewhat nervous, as if she was embarrassed about her behavior//

I don't understand why this would embarrass her. It's a heartfelt emotion, one that's completely understandable.

>Clover!” She said//

Capitalization.

>two-hundred//

No hyphen.

>Nor did I feel like.//

Like what?

>A slight pause.//

And another meaningless one.

>My voice crackled some.//

>Her mouth twitched some.//
Repetitive phrasing so close together.

>She did not like anypony else try//

Syntax is off.

>two-hundred//

Just do a global search and replace on it. There are times it's valid to hyphenate it, but it's uncommon, and I don't see any so far.

This story's kind of an odd bird. The whole point of it is that Clover's going to tell Celestia what became of Star Swirl. The whole first chapter does nothing but lead up to the actual plot. And by the end, nothing happens. Celestia knows now, but there's no conclusion drawn from it. Nothing gets resolved, and there isn't even a direction set to start resolving it, in the way that a good open ending would. The only character development is in relation to a tangential plot that doesn't even get brought up until the last few thousand words.

I read your author's note about how you pieced the story together, and from reading it, it does really feel like that's how it was done, since it doesn't have strong thematic ties between the parts, as if it were a single, coherent plan. It could just use a little more thought as to how the last chapter provides or implies the resolution of what happened in chapter 2.

Aside from that, it's just the detailed things I had to keep mentioning, particularly all the one-line/one-sentence paragraphs and the prevalence of boring "to be" verbs.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2894

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A blur of colors whizzed through the sky; a rainbow trail left behind for brief seconds where the owner of those colors had been.//

A semicolon's really supposed to go between independent clauses. You should be able to replace it with a period and have two complete sentences, but you can't here.

>Rocketing only feet away from the observer, pink strands of mane//

This says the pink strands of mane are rocketing, not that Dash is.

>the mare flicked wild messy mane back//

Missing word.

>her friend whom had been observing her//

That's not a spot for "whom."

>the girl whom had been watching//

That either.

>“Well?” She asked impatiently.//

Speech tags don't get capitalized.

>The other pegasus shyly brushes a lock of her mane//

Why are you switching to present tense?

Your perspective continues to bounce back and forth between them, and when it stays factual, that's fine, but the narration expresses the characters' opinions and impressions as if his own often enough that it's more of a limited narration, and head-hopping is a bad idea with that.

>She would ramble for hours and hours about various facts about the group that she was familiar with//

That's just awkwardly phrased, and it's pretty much repeating what the last sentence already said twice.

>Fluttershy didn’t mind though, she wasn’t a very skilled conversationalist//That comma's a splice. It's tacking together two complete sentences.


>her friends whom insisted she needed a backup plan//

You keep using "whom" where "who" is actually the correct choice.

You haven't marked this as an AU, but it diverges from canon quite a lot. Fluttershy couldn't attend many of Dash's events? Well, some things, like Fluttershy having to pass a flight test and both of them attending college, aren't explicitly contradicted by canon, but neither do them seem to be implied by it. You can get away with some of this, but the more and more it piles up, it gets harder to take on the whole.

>Spitefire//

Typo.

>one whom I have personally trained//

That's the only "whom" I've seen so far that is correct.

>Wonderbolts,” she paused for a moment so reporters could murmur amongst each other, “That//

The way you go out and back into speech with commas suggests the quote is one continuous sentence, but it clearly isn't, and you've capitalized "That."

>Rarity had gone on a designing spree and made on inspired by each of her friends.//

Typo.

>Clearing her throat, Rainbow’s loud voice//

This says her voice cleared her throat.

>“Thank you, Spitefire,” she paused//

Another typo, and your speech tag doesn't have a speaking action in it.

>Today, I’m here with some of the best flyers around whom have lead me to greatness.//

That just doesn't parse.

>her pet rabbit, Angel//

This kind of appositive needs commas on both sides or none at all.

It's kind of odd seeing Dash use semicolons in her letter. She doesn't seem like the type to know how, much less be inclined to.

>She had decided on a blue sweater than Rainbow had given her years ago as a Christmas present.//

Typo. And it's Hearth's Warming there.

>Pegasus//

Don't capitalize that.

>The bellboy had lead Fluttershy//

The past tense is "led."

>the banana colored pegasus//

You're using Fluttershy's perspective. Why would she describe herself this way?

>fluttershy//

Capitalization.

>for when whatever opened that door did//

Huh?

>paled blue//

Typo.

>T-thank//

Think about wha sound she'd actually repeat. There isn't a "t" sound in that word.

>segway//

segue

>speaking again, “any//

Capitalization.

>gentle patter//

>gentle smile//
These are only a sentence apart. Avoid close word repetition like this.

Okay, I took fewer and fewer notes as I read, since I was just seeing more of the same things. Don't take these notes as a comprehensive list. They're just examples.

Now the romance. It's hard to develop a good romance. It's not enough to just say one character loves the other. You have to prove it. All I know about Fluttershy is that she finds Rainbow attractive and like to watch her fly? But what does she actually like about her? What makes her think Rainbow is good relationship material, that they'd be compatible? Right near the end, you start to scratch the surface of that, when Fluttershy starts telling Rainbow all the times she admired her through their lives. That kind of anecdote is really where a romance can shine, since it shows them actually in love, but it needs much more detail.

From the other side, we get nothing. I have no idea what Dash likes about Fluttershy. It's a really cliched plot, too where one pony reveals a long-standing secret crush, and upon learning about it, the other pony either reveals the same, or just suddenly decides they're in love, too. You have to do something to stand out from the crowd of stories that all do this same thing. And the best way is to make their relationship really vibrant. How to accomplish that? Well, rather than spend a long time typing out a bunch of advice, I'll refer you to Aragon, who's written a good series of blogs on how to build a believable romance. They're linked from his homepage. I'd recommend reading through them.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2932

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Right away, the story is a bit stagnant, since it's pretty heavily front-loaded with "to be" verbs. They're inherently boring, as nothing happens, and the beginning of a story is an espeecially important place to create an active feel and grab the reader's interest. You'd do well to rephrase these with active verbs where possible.

>“I noticed you were very tense around Cup Cake,” Fluttershy said.//

She didn't seem very tense. Paint a picture of it for me.

>First your filly goes missing//

She'd mentioned ponies disappearing in her dreams, but not that it happened in real life, too. Seems like that would have come up right away. It's also strange they assume Carrot left even though Pumpkin "disappeared." Why doesn't anyone think Carrot might be a disappearance as well?

>Losing your whole family//

Wait, what happened to Pound Cake?

>things - encouraging, loyal, competitive - but//

Please use proper dashes for cutoffs and asides. There's a brief guide to them at the top of this thread. In numerous places, you use hyphens were dashes are appropriate.

>Fluttershy decided she’d try to help Rainbow, starting with her worries about Cup Cake.//

This is redundant, since she goes on to do exactly that. You don't want to over-explain things.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

In canon, they spell "Sugarcube" as one word. This comes up again in later chapters.

>As she listened to Thunderlane rant//

This is the 5th sentence of this scene. It's the 4th in a row with an "as" clause. It's the 3rd in a row where that "as" clause starts the sentence. Beware getting structurally repetitive like this.

>highly-rated fliers//

Two-word modifiers that start with an -ly adverb don't need hyphens.

>They never invited Fluttershy, but it was their loss.//

I find this very confusing. I can't believe this is Fluttershy's thought process, so it must be Dash's. Indeed, this whole paragraph seems to relate things through Dash's eyes. Yet the previous paragraph was very much through Fluttershy's viewpoint. I didn't even know Dash was there until the second paragraph, after all. You don't want to bounce the perspective around like this. There's a section on head-hopping at the top of the thread that gives some rationale for that.

>the yellow pony//

And no matter which of them holds the perspective, neither one would have a reason to describe Fluttershy in such an external, formal way. You don't think of your best friend in such abstract terms, do you? Or yourself.

>The other pegasus//

Another very external reference for this limited a narrator.

>Rainbow said, exasperated//

Don't tell me she's exasperated. Demonstrte it. What does she do? How does she look?

>an empty honeycomb lying on the ground//

Wait, that's an odd thing to have just randomly lying around a shed.

>Fluttershy rushed to her, grabbing the baker around her barrel.//

>Fluttershy bolted forward, leaping over the platform’s edge with her forelegs stretched out.//
>A whoosh of wind knocked her mane into her eyes, stopping her in mid flight.//
See how you keep tacking those participial phrases onto the ends of sentences? Just the fact you keep using them plus you keep putting them in the same place makes this very repetitive. Authors of intermediate experience tend to overuse participles, and they stand out easily when repeated, since you don't encounter them that much in everyday conversations. They have a few attendant problems I'll likely see as well, if you keep using so many. In fact, I see one already. Note that participles make things happen at the same time. Yet in that first one, Fluttershy wouldn't grab Cup Cake until after rushing to her, yet you have them happening simultaneously.

I don't get why Dash is having so much trouble carrying Mrs. Cake. She's carried multiple ponies before.

>A curving cavern//

This whole paragraph, where you have paired alliteration, is severly undercutting the story's mood. Alliteration usually creates a playful feel, and that's precisely the opposite of what you want.

And then you try to get poetic with lots of rhymes, and to be honest, most of these rhymes are very forced to the point the language seems nonsensical. I get that being nonsensical is somewhat the point, but there's a fine line. This just sounds goofy, where it should be menacing or disorienting.

>Fluttershy ran her hoof along her sides to if she had been burned//

Missing word.

>significantly singed, or scarcely scorched//

Yeah, you're severely overdoing the alliteration.

>a few second before//

Typo.

>The unicorn stood besides her//

beside

The alliteration is more tolerable as a speech affectation of Rarity's, but in the narration, it's just annoying.

>attached to which was a slender thread that she and Rarity dangled from//

That's... kind of strange how you take pains to avoid one dangling preposition but not the other. I really don't mind either way, but this is inconsistent.

>one of the thread//

Typo.

>small, white//

These are hierarchical adjectives, so they don't need a comma. The (non-foolproof) test is to see whether they describe different aspects, or to see if they sound very awkward in reverse order. If the answer to those is yes, you probably don't need the comma.

It strikes me that aside from flowery language and having a sewing-themed weapon, Rarity doesn't seem like Rarity at all. If you're going to call her that, then have her be Rarity. Otherwise, just make an OC. Maybe Rarity's supposed to emulate a specific character from the manga? If so, it'd work better as an MLP crossover in the Magica Madoka fandom than the other way around.

>He hopped onto Rainbow and begin//

>for a few second//
Typos.

>Fluttershy had plenty of practice dragging the reckless pegasus home from Sweet Apple Acres, and hoisted her with ease.//

Wait, what? Then why did Rainbow Dash have so much trouble carrying Mrs. Cake? She's much stronger than Fluttershy.

What happened to Cup Cake? Maybe I just missed it, but I didn't see where she got returned home. And wouldn't Fluttershy and Dash want to check on her later? Rarity just glosses over it to say she's fine.

>What you saw with your very own eyes was this unicorn dispatch//

dispatching

>pegasi companions//

Noun adjuncts are singular. For instance, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches."

>bring out fresh binds//

Usually bonds or bindings.

>herd//

Most readers will assume "herd," but a group of ponies is actually a "string." Though I don't expect you to use that.

Now that I'm significantly into chapter 4, i have to wonder what the point is. Mrs. Cake hasn't been that big a deal in the story, and neither has Apple Bloom, yet you're dwelling at length on both. It's a rather different thing than Rarity's description of there being lots of witches around, and that they could always use more fighters to combat them. By focusing so heavily on one (who is already dead, no less), it's taking focus away from the bigger picture.

And now we're getting a ton of exposition about Fluttershy. Delivering it in one big batch like this is asking for lots of trouble. It's only marginally interesting, mostly because I don't see any relevance for it yet. Exposition works best when you dole it out a little at a time, as it becomes pertinent to the plot.

>blood shot//

bloodshot

>Where did you learn to do heal ponies//

Extraneous word.

>can enters//

Typo.

>But, Rarity talked Rainbow into it//

It's rare that a comma after a conjunction is used correctly. This one isn't.

>… And//

Don't leave a space after a leading ellipsis. You have several through here.

>Manure!?//

When you have a word italicized to show emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>mail box//

mailbox

>roundtrip//

That's two words.

>Or, it was supposed to be.//

Lose the comma.

>A part of her wanted tell //

Missing word.

>No, there couldn’t, a witch wouldn’t, trap ponies here, that much is clear//

I get that you're putting the commas to show where the rhymed lines are, but it's coming across as really forced.

>I didn’t….//

You only need three dots. Four is really for citations in formal writing.

>some of her friend//

Typo.

>freshly-waxed//

You don't need hyphens on two-word phrases that being with an -ly adverb.

>All wrong.//

This is an occasional problem with the story, and I'll revisit it in more detail when I write up my closing discussion, but this scene goes into the third paragraph before I know what perspective it's in. The previous scene was in Fluttershy's, so the presumption will be that she continues to hold the viewpoint until there's evidence otherwise. It doesn't feel like her voicing here, so it probably has changed, but I don't get to find out who for a while. What that means is that I have to store up the whole scene to that point in my head, then reapply that context to it once I know. That's a pretty big thing to ask of a reader, and many will just gloss over it and lose the effect you're creating by having a limited narrator in the first place.

>I don’t think I’m done a great job of it//

Typo.

>protégé//

Applejack's female, so protégée.

>There’s been no reports//

You're mixing singular (has been) with plural (reports).

>So, she ignored it.//

No comma.

>pretending to the the stranger//

Typo.

>Fluttershy lost track of time//

Looks like you have an inadvertent line break here. Or maybe you need another.

>a lost expression was on her face//

Given the syntax you're trying to use, you shouldn't have that "was" there.

>The stranger grimaced against their binds.//

Again, either bonds or bindings would be much more typical.

>The swirling clouds of ink she figured were minions laid crumpled on the floor.//

"Laid" is transitive; it requires a direct object. You want "lay."

This chapter finally developed Rarity into more of the character we know than one who only bears a superficial resemblance to her, so good on that front. However, I'm not sure all these gimmicky chapters are that good an idea. I'd talked about how the one that kept resorting to alliteration undercut its own tone. Similarly, this one is presumably supposed to be a gimmick related to the witch's effect. It looks more like a screenplay, but I could also buy it as a libretto, which ties in to music. But it's focused on Rarity's viewpoint during the fight, meaning she experiences it like this. It's far more likely this would be from the witch's viewpoint, since it would choose to see things through this lens, yet what does it accomplish to use the witch's perspective? We don't even know who it is, much less have a desire to identify with it. I'll get back to this later when I discuss perspective at the end.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2933

>>2932
>Now that I think of it, I presume that tragedy was fresh on her mind.//
It's surprising that a lawyer worth his credentials would think this to be well-considered and not insist she get to a more stable frame of mind before redoing her will.

This also smacks of you putting Flim in the story by name only, just to have a recognizable one. He acts nothing like Flim. He's completely on the up-and-up, and he's not trying to scheme them out of anything.

>vaguely remembered extravagances and furbelows//

Rainbow's the only one present for this, so if you're indeed using a limited narrator, she's the only candidate. Yet this sounds nothing like word choices she'd make. And it does feel like limited narration through here, as it's full of subjective judgments.

>or for church//

Conceptually, I don't have a problem with there being churches in Equestria. But just be aware that it suggests a lot of world-building that the story never delivers. Plus it's very late in the story to introduce a pretty fundamental piece of world-building. Not that it'll be critical to the plot (in which case it's also extraneous), but the way Dash so casually mentions it also makes it something that's fairly pervasive in the culture, or something she has a personal familiarity with, neither of which is suggested.

>gas lights//

gaslights

>out of the way hallway//

You're using "out of the way" as a phrasal adjective, so hyphenate it.

>why on earth//

But they're not on Earth... Is it just an earth pony expression that's more generic? Seems odd for a pegasus to use it then.

>Fluttershy retreated from the map room, and decided she needed a smaller project to start off with.//

>she climbed the stairs and found her way to the master bedroom//
Note the inconsistent comma usage here. This is an intermittent issue throughout the story. In both cases, there's merely a compound verb, yet you use a comma in one and not the other. For a compound verb or subject, you usually don't need one. When you do use one is when you have a whole new subject-verb pair. Like in the first one, if you'd said "and she decided," then a comma would be appropriate.

>There was even a nice breeze coming from an open window//

Interesting. Dash had considered opening the window and explicitly did not. I trust this is intentional. But then nothing ever comes of it.

>Then, the doorbell rang.//

Another unnecessary comma after a conjunction.

>pretend-Fluttershy//

After the first couple of these, we get the picture. You can just call them by name.

>There was a half-empty bottle of cider//

You have a lot of these "there was" constructions in describing Dash's house. Despite getting repetitive, it also kills the momentum with inactive verbs.

>all-empty ones besides it//

Kind of a curious use of "besides." Are you sure you didn't mean "beside"?

>Then, she dumped the rest of the cider//

No comma.

>once in awhile//

You have to be careful choosing between "awhile" and "a while." The first is an adverb, and the second is a noun. They won't parse in the same places in sentences. This needs to be two words so you have a noun to be the object of the preposition "in."

>There used to be a brash, energetic, and most of all, happy pony, and she lived right here.//

All of this is pretty nebulous. If you want the reader to become invested in Dash's character, be more specific. What exactly happened to her? Why did that affect her the way it did? One or two examples will speak far louder than a sweeping generalization.

>Kyubey was besides her on the bed.//

Yeah, you're definitely confusing "beside" with "besides." Only "beside" describs a physical position. "Besides" means "in addition to" or "not taking into account."

>Searching for a change of topic, her attention fell on Applejack’s necklace.//

Beware dangling participles. This says that her attention was searching for a change of topic.

>Then, he said it was time for her to summon her weapon.//

No comma. Just do a Ctrl-f for "Then,".

>once familiar//

Another spot where you need to hyphenate a phrasal adjective.

>The Adventure Book//

Book titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized. You have a couple instances of it.

>The blue pegasus//

This scene's been in Dash's perspective. Why would she refer to herself in such an external, formal way?

>Phillydelphia//

It kind of loses the horse pun if you don't spell it "Fillydelphia." Plus that's the canon spelling, and you use it later on.

>Winesap’s daughter//

I'm assuming you wrote this before we knew her father's name to be Bright Mac. Would it be a big deal to change it? You get a pass anyway for it being an AU, but unless some part of the plot hinges on it being that name, there's no reason not to.

>I might want to see Apple Bloom, first.//

No need for that comma.

>Fluttershy caught up to her and besides her in silence.//

Even correcting that to "beside," it still wouldn't parse. You're missing a verb.

>who she thought had a blue coat//

Whom, though as this is Fluttershy's limited narration, it's up to you whether you want her to know that.

>Fluttersay//

Typo.

>Rainbow winced.//

Missing a line break here.

>the pegasus’s neck//

Another odd reference. Dash is Fluttershy's good friend, so why would she refer to her so impersonally?

>Rainbow tussled Fluttershy mane//

"Tussle" means to get into a fight. You want "tousle." And you're missing an apostrophe.

>where Applejack laid upside down//

lay

>graceful navigation of treacherous discussions//

You're starting to lose Dash's voice again. This doesn't sound like something she'd say, and limited narration is essentially internal dialogue.

>Only, they never did.//

No comma.

>Applejack’s head jerked up, and she glared at Rainbow. Rainbow met her gaze. Applejack broke the stare first and pulled herself off the chair. She continued walking to the middle of the room, where she stopped mid-stride. Her head drooped.//

This paragraph badly needs some variety. All of the sentences are short. All start with the subject. Only two have a dependent clause. None have any other sort of parenthetical element, like an aside, absolute phrase, or participial phrase. It doesn't take much seasoning to add a lot of flavor, and this is just bland.

>The smile faded away, and her head rolled back towards the floor.//

This is near the beginning of a long paragraph. There isn't any more narration in it. There isn't any narration in the next paragraph. There isn't any narration in the next three paragraphs after that. Monologuing has its place, but it's tougher to buy here. Applejack doesn't have any reason I've seen to sit perfectly still, and real people do things while they talk. And from the other side of it, you haven't given Dash a reason to be so riveted on it that she doesn't pay attention to anything else, which is a viable way to work it through the limited narration.

>everyday//

"Every day" and "everyday" aren't the same thing. The one you've chosen means "ordinary."

>Applejack grew quiet. Rainbow approached with hesitant steps and sat beside her. Rainbow reached out a foreleg and laid it on Applejack’s back. Applejack tensed and gave Rainbow a sidelong stare.//

And once we do finally get some narration, it's back to that plodding, repetitive structure.

>Or, you can also take//

No comma.

>side-to-side//

This isn't modifying something that comes after it, so you don't need the hyphens.

>Cup Dazzle//

And we've learned in canon her name was Chiffon Swirl. Really, if you went and edited this and changed Winesap to Bright Mac, what would it really hurt? And then you wouldn't have readers asking why you aren't in agreement with the show.

>So, you had a chance to revive somepony who did everything she could to deserve her life, and instead you wished away your own pain.//

Why doesn't Dash cut in her and explain her original plan. It'd help a bit, and I'd think she'd want to defend herself. It was her first instinct to save them, after all.

>getting a drink the cider bar//

Missing word.

>The air was cold as stone//

And since the encounter began, this is already the third time you've mentioned stone, and it's not done in a way that's obviously thematic, so it just comes across as an oversight.

This chapter reminds me of the earlier ones that have witch encounters formatted as poetry. Yet I can't make rhyme nor reason out of this one. I can't see the logic of how it's organized into lines. It's not by rhythm. there are a couple of rhymes, but nothing regularly spaced. I don't know what sort of atmosphere you're trying to create, so whatever your intent was it's lost on me. In fact, I was a little put off by the more readily identifiable poetry earlier, since while it rhymed, it had very irregular rhythm. And yet it had a kind of show tune feel to me, which can get away with that. Still, you want to be sure this formatting is accomplishing something. Different for the sake of different is pointless, and I'm not getting anything more than that out of it.

About this fire... Dash is on the weather team. Can't she go get a raincloud?

>Applejack huddled besides the entryway//

beside

Okay, I like this story. I know very little of Madoka Magica, so I can't tell if some of the story's quirks are meant to emulate it, but I didn't feel lost at all, which is a sign of an effective crossover. Especially the weirdness that comes in when they're in a labyrinth, which I'd guess is more likely to come from the manga, since what you're doing is very different from a visual effect. I do think the alliterative one, as I said, is harming the mood. As to the rest of them, I think there's also a perspective problem.

In fact, perspective was an issue in other places as well. I noted spots already, so I won't detail them again, only to say that you seem to write limited narration, so be careful that you're staying in a consistent viewpoint and not jumping around unnecessarily to different characters. And then those labyrinth scenes. I alluded to this before, but the one that seems like a screenplay fights the perspective as well, since the only one who would choose to experience it that way is the witch, yet none of the witches are explicitly in the story. So the scenes are structured to make it feel like Rarity or Fluttershy or whoever holds the perspective at the time is the one viewing it like that, and it just has a plausibility problem.

A related matter is when the limited narrator loses the voicing of the character he's supposed to represent, which most often happened with Dash.

Yet you've done a very good job of characterization. The only standout to me was Rarity, who, as I said, doesn't really come across as her until we've already been with her for a while. So for quite a bit of the time she's around, I'm wondering where her insistence on the finer things in life is, her need to adjust everyone else's wardrobe, and especially why she's so willing to leap right into a fight. Like Jumping down the throat, fighting a tongue, getting spit and blood all over her, and not complaining one bit? That's not the Rarity I know. Not that there couldn't be a reason why she's changed in this manner, but you have to present it. Don't just make her different and rely on me to come up with the reason why. That's your job.

There's not all that much that needs fixing, really. The most extensive bit is making the weird labyrinth narration (seriously, does the manga do that, because the anime doesn't) suit the perspective, and clean up the rhyme and rhythm of it, for that matter. But I could even let that drop as a stylistic thing if everything else got fixed up.

Ah, but there's the rub. You have that sex tag on the story, and not a hint of it has turned up so far. Because sex and gore are the two main ways stories violate our content guidelines, we need to see how bad it'll get. We can't post such things sight unseen. So I'd need to know how explicit that's going to get, either by getting a synopsis of that specific plot thread or by seeing a rough draft of the chapter(s) where it happens. Nothing in the extended synopsis of future chapters you sent us deals with this, either, so I'm flying totally blind on it, and I can't do that.

Finally, a word about the story description. You have another one of those erroneous commas after a conjunction ("So,"), and it's quite cliched to ask rhetorical questions, particularly to end on one.

You're well on your way to having this posted. It just needs some tweaks here and there (and please apply them to your future chapters as well, since a lot of those things are likely to be pervasive), and I'd need to know what all the sex tag will entail. If all that's satisfactory, I could definitely see posting this.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2936

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I really don't see the point of putting whole chapters or even whole scenes in italics. I don't know what the italics are supposed to signify (flashbacks? personal thoughts?), plus italics are meant to show emphasis, and when everything is emphasized, nothing is.

>districts sat in the shadow of the proud, but kind edifice and the full moon would hang in the air in just the right place//

I have zero idea what this means. "Edifice" isn't the kind of thing that goes without an article; it's used here more like it's an abstract idea. And I'm just baffled at what "districts" is supposed to evoke.

>the moon above the midnight sky//

I'm not sure how the moon would be above the sky from his perspective. If he were in orbit, sure.

>The Crystal Ball had passed a few months ago and she had not danced.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>moon - the simple movement of the sky seemed to make him vanish - and//

Please use proper dashes for interruptions and asides, not hyphens.

>Sombra's gaze changed and she saw mischief in his eyes.//

Needs a comma.

>How on earth//

I'm not sure how that expression works in Equestria. If he were an earth pony, maybe, but he's a unicorn.

>you're dreadfully boring and standing here is certainly worthwhile isn't it?//

Missing a couple of commas.

>did a double take as she looked at King Sombra//

That's weirdly redundant and contradictory at the same time.

>her wariness broken and replaced with confusion//

You're using a limited narrator, so it's a bit off-putting to have her readily identify her emotion. That's not really how people experience it. To wit, if she's confused, it's more natural for her to try thinking her way through it or ask a question internally, not just to say she's confused.

>with slight disgust still visible//

And that's working against the perspective again. Her eyes are your camera. How can she see her own expression to evaluate it as disgust? You've even explicitly called it a visual thing.

>She too, felt stiff//

If you're going to use commas with "too," put them on both sides of it.

>He gave her a curious sideways glance and Cadance tried to remember what it was like having somepony who was taller than her.//

Needs a comma.

>Sombra noted that she sounded slightly sheepish//

Why are you switching to Sombra's perspective? The chapter didn't start there, and just as quickly, you go back to Cadence's. What was the value of being there? And if it has some, then surely it's worth staying there longer than a few paragraphs.

>When was the last time it was spoken?//

The tense is off here. It should be "had been spoken."

>with disinterest//

This isn't the same thing as saying he had no interest. It means he was once interested but no longer is, so make sure that's what you want.

>Cadance looked at her hooves and muttered something Sombra didn't hear and he promptly gave her another one of his curious looks that was best described as cat-like.//

And now the perspective is wavering badly. The narration identifies it as something he didn't hear before there's any evidence of such presented, which puts it in his viewpoint, but in the same sentence, there's a more external evaluation of his expression that'd seem to be more from Cadence. This also needs a comma between the clauses.

>Sighing, Cadance spoke up.//

The participle means these happen at the same time. It'd be strange for her to raise her voice while sighing.

>her not-quite-right smile//

Now you're back in Sombra's viewpoint.

>It'd take a lot explaining.//

Missing word.

>thirty two//

Needs a hyphen.

>Isn't a little weird to you that a gloomy ghost is telling me to lighten up...?//

That's a complete thought, so I don't know why she's trailing off with it.

>Cadance's smile was as it should be.//

Back into Sombra's viewpoint after having returned to Cadence's. I haven't been marking all the shifts. The perspective is really jumping around a lot.

>wither//

That's generally used as a collective term: on her withers.

>to signal the start of his interruption//

But he didn't interrupt her. She finished speaking.

>last question first//

Odd juxtaposition. I think dropping the "last" wouldn't harm anything.

>looking completely relaxed//

Back to Cadence's head.

>The moon's light could be obscured, after all and a cloud outside did the trick.//

Needs a comma.

>"W-Wh-"//

Two things: Only capitalize the first part of a stutter unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway. And since I don't know which word she was going to say, I don't know how to hear this. A "w" sound for "what" or "why"? An "h" sound for "who"?

>The next deep breath Cadance took was heard by both//

I have no idea which perspective this is, since neither one could definitively know that about the other without seeing evidence of it.

>her form glittering like a diamond//

Seems to be more from Sombra's viewpoint.

>Sombra's ghostly limb slipped into hers and she pulled him into the light.//

Needs a comma.

>I'm barely physically//

Physically what?

>He speaks the word with particular disgust, as though there's something about it he wants to dodge.//

Why is this in present tense? And narrative asides in quotes like this don't get capitalized or end punctuation (except possibly for an exclamation mark or question mark, if appropriate).

>She nodded into his wither.//

withers

>one who have//

Verb conjugation is off.

>Sombra felt Cadance nod.//

Now you're in his head again.

>Cadance was relieved//

Don't be so direct. If she's relieved, then in her own head, she's going to have a "thank goodness" or some such, not a blunt "I'm relieved."

At this point, I have to wonder if you're writing an AU where she isn't married to Shining Armor. He's conspicuously absent from her thoughts.

>Cadance's hooves hurt from the night's dancing and laying out on the floor wasn't as cold as Sombra's deathly cold touch//

Needs a comma, and lie/lay confusion.

>Unable to touch anything other than flesh and his own regalia, Sombra found himself unable//

Watch that close word repetition.

>the first that Cadance had seen the handsome stallion make//

He hadn't smiled in any of the prior chapters? I could swear I'd read it, and since you were using her as your limited narrator, if the narrator mentions it, it follows that she knows about it.

>He crossed his ghostly forehooves and his expression soured.//

Needs a comma.

>the solitary Empress//

This really smacks of having moved to his perspective, since it'd be really strange for her to refer to herself in such a manner.

>Sombra looked down at the solitary Empress sprawled across the floor, and listened to her laugh for a moment longer//

That's actually a spot that doesn't need the comma, since the verb "listened" doesn't get its own subject.

>as it its//

Typo.

>you had interrupted me//

Why is he injecting past perfect tense when responding to a past tense question?

>the use in the south//

Typo.

>The green piece of glass close to Sombra wouldn't budge in any pointless attempt to pick it up that he made.//

That's really awkwardly phrased.

>Quirky things like this were Auntie Luna's niche but she hadn't realized how lonely she'd been//

Needs a comma.

>She didn't let that thought finish and Sombra's gaze only left her when she looked at him again, holding an azure fragment of glass in her magic.//

Needs a comma. Also note that grammatically speaking, it first appears he's the one holding the glass, since the phrase is located closer to his mention. It's a tad ambiguous.

>Flurry's//

Ah, so Shining Armor is in the picture. Curious that he's never come up until now.

>Y-Yeah//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>She grew up and moved out and has her own kingdom.//

And the picture comes together. I don't see what's gained by hiding when the story takes place until now, but if you're attached to the idea, it's not a big deal.

>Instead of looking down sorrowfully, as Cadance was prone to do whenever social subjects involving other ponies came up, she perked up.//

That's phrased pretty externally to her, and it's oddly expository during a scene that hasn't been.

>Cadance's purple tipped wings//

You'd wandered into her perspective around here. It's really odd for her to comment on the color of her wings. Why would she even notice?

>I had guard when I ruled//

Seems like that should be "guards" or "a guard."

>The tall Goddess-Empress of the Crystal Empire, Mi Amore Cadenza//

Again, a strange way for her to refer to herself.

>k-know//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. There isn't even a "k" sound in that word.

>M-My//

Only capitalize the first one.

>trying to meet his calmed gaze//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>and Cadance nuzzled him back, once before wilting again//

Having a comma alone there is really strange. Either put another after "once" or drop this one.

>Sombry she was so young when it happened//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Sombra leaned down to nuzzle her again and Cadance reached up a forehoof to stroke his fluffy face, no matter how cold he was, she felt comforted for the first time since the slow freeze of everything centuries ago.//

That first part needs a comma, and one of the two commas you have is a splice. It just depends on which part you want "no matter how cold he was" to go with.

>Cadance nodded, and thawed a little bit more.//

Unnecessary comma.

>he still had an actor's heart and his voice brought every word to life//

Needs a comma.

>It was a very silly thought, in fact, it was as silly as her eyes watering at the thought of her ghostly lover vanishing like all was a dream.//

Same deal: one of those commas is a splice, but it's up to you which one.

>a dusty vinyl//

A dusty vinyl what? Or is it common nowadays to use that word as a synonym for "record"?

>Was their distinguishing feature, their unreasonably short tails?//

Unnecessary comma.

>nine inch tail//

nine-inch

>cold. formal//

That period should be a comma.

>"Do lutes count as a genre?"//

Given what we know about the Crystal Empire's history, I'm surprised he doesn't have anything to say about flugelhorns.

>you had been reading to be//

Typo.

>your own husband//

So... they're married now? That's a rather abrupt change to the relationship. I guess I'll have to talk about this in a minute.

Well, I'm at the end, so I'll talk about it now!

I do see the progression of why Cadence ends up with him, though I'm still not exactly in touch with why. He offers her a connection to her past and is the only one who will dance with her. She does gradually act comfortable around him. But I never really get a sense of what she likes about him. Just that he's the only option does not good romance make. How is it that their personalities are compatible? What does she see as good relationship material in him? I don't know if you;ve seen it, but Aragon did a series of blog posts on how to do realistic romance, and he keeps them linked on his homepage. It might be worth going through that to make sure you have a solid romance.

It works both ways as well. From Sombra's side, all I can tell is that she's the only one who will talk to him, maybe the only one who can see him. But I have no idea what he likes about her, how he feels the mesh well together, other than they both like dancing. Now, there's something to be said for atmosphere conveying some of that. The times they play games or read together do show that they at least have a deep friendship, and that can work for portraying a relationship well after the formative stages, but the formative stages are precisely what the story is meant to document, so it feels like a big omission to leave that out.

For that matter, Sombra is evasive about his past, and he never answers her. I don't know how she lets him get away with sweeping it under the rug that he had a reign of terror over an enslaved and mind-controlled population, and probably would have killed Cadence, given the opportunity. But all that just gets shoved aside so Cadence can love him without any obstacles. That's a pretty glaring thing to overlook when deciding you can utterly trust someone.

It ended up not being so bad that Shining Armor didn't come into it until late, but make sure that works with the perspective. And a quick aside: the perspective does need to be ironed out quite a bit, as it skips back and forth between them almost constantly. But assuming you want Cadence to be the viewpoint character (she is at the point of the reveal, anyway), does she have a motivation to avoid even thinking about it so it won't show up in the narration? Sure she does. But that doesn't mean she can exercise complete control of her thoughts and keep it from ever coming up. As I noted, there are several places where it would have been natural for it to, so these are where some aborted intrusive thoughts might start up before she can tamp them down. That would make it feel more realistic, like she's struggling to keep her mind off it instead of being implausibly free of such thoughts.

I don't know how much you're willing to add to this, or if you want to keep it within what would have been allowed for the contest. Touching up the editing and perspective aren't really going to change the word count, but building up a more solid romance might, depending on whether you can cut other things to balance. But that and the jumpy perspective are really the big things here. I just didn't come away from the story with an understanding of why either of them would choose the other, and you're not trying to play it up as a dysfunctional thing. The atmosphere and characterization were good, so I'd just like to see a stronger foundation for the relationship.

Jay Bear!cSWoEWwnvICountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2938

>>2932
>>2933

Author here! Thank you very much for the thorough critique. One of my goals with this story is to experiment with tone, style, and perspective, so it's especially helpful to see where those experiments don't work and distract from the story. That said, you also flagged a lot of things that weren't experiments and just need to be better written (chapter 1 in general, Rarity OOC in chapter 2, that infodump in chapter 4, etc.). I'll get to work on re-writing before asking any in-depth questions, since I'm sure I can resolve some questions on my own.

Regarding the Sex tag, I added that for the double entendre titles of Rarity's romance novels, and don't have plans to add anything else that would merit the tag. It sounds like I was being overly cautious with FimFic's tagging rules and can safely remove it, though.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2939

>>2938
I did find those different formats interesting, so I wouldn't call them failed experiments. It's just that they didn't quite fit the chosen perspective. The one with all the alliteration did create a confused feel, which would be right on target, except it did it in more of a comical way than a menacing one. It may well be that the witch sees the situation as comical, but then you'd need to be in her perspective to show that, and the witches aren't even shown as characters, so that's not possible. That said, they can be tweaked to show the experience of the perspective characters you chose.

Again let's take the alliterative one. Iirc, Fluttershy is the perspective character for that one. And she gets affected by the labyrinth enough that she starts speaking in alliteration as well, so it's not out of the question that it flows into her perception of what's happening. A similar effect happens later on as well, when the hunters speak in rhyme, or Fluttershy gets fooled by the fork in the road. So some of those would only take a minor tweak. Show it as the perspective character sees it, not as the witch does, and make the mood match. Rarity fighting the tongue monster is an example of one that did work well. The script-format one less so, since I don't know how writing it out as stage directions and labeled dialogue is supposed to inform my interpretation of how the perspective character at the time (I forget who it was) would perceive what was going on. I mean, what about the labyrinth would make it seem to that hunter that she was acting out a script? Writing it out as one doesn't quite do it, but there are other narrative tricks that might, like having the hunter feel like she was taking her fight cues from a director or something. I'm just spitballing here, but that's the kind of thought process you need here: how does the perspective character experience it?
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2940

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Thanks for walking me to the train station, daddy.//

When used as terms of address or effectively as names, family relations get capitalized.

>deep in her mane. He took a deep//

Try to avoid repeating all but the most mundane of words in a close space like this.

>to—” Pear Butter was cut off//

It's pretty redundant to narrate getting cut off when the punctuation already shows it.

>She spat her bag out and quickly crossed over to Grand Pear, planting a quick kiss on his cheek and running back to the train.//

Note that participles mean things happen at the same time, so she goes to Grand Pear, kisses him, and runs back simultaneously, where it's more reasonable for her to do that in a sequence.

>I love you, daddy!//

Capitalization of the family relation again.

>Even though his hooves felt like they were glued in place//

This is 8th paragraph, but it's the first that doesn't start with dialogue. Try and mix up the structure a bit for variety.

>tall, black//

These are hierarchical adjective, so they don't need a comma. The non-foolproof test is that if they describe different aspects of something, or if they sound really awkward in reverse order, you don't need the comma.

>the end of the last car raced past him, the bright red lights on the end//

Watch that repetition again.

>all he could do was lay still//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight.

>In the exact same ritual he performed every morning//

You could use some more variety in your narration like this sentence. So many of your narrative sentences start with the subject. Most of your sentences probably will, but break them up hre and there. It doesn't take much to have a big impact.

This paragraph has its own couple of instances of repetition. There are two phrasings that get used twice:
>towards the house’s living areas
>towards the stove
>the house’s selection

>Breakfast was accounted for//

It's often hard to put my finger on exactly why something isn't working when it's purely related to the story's feel, but I'll try. The opening scene had more visual imagery than this, and there was tension. A good-bye, and we didn't know why, plus the action with the train kept interest up. Now, it's just Grand Pear going through his morning routine, and it's really dull. This paragraph is one of the worst offenders. It gives us quite a bit of detail, but it's detail that doesn't mean anything. None of these events or descriptions are going to be important to the plot. I can get that maybe you're deliberately trying to create a mood of boring routine, but that's very difficult to do while keeping the story entertaining. If you want to establish a sense of boredom, it's best to make it short.

>yesterday’s paper. If he remembered right, he still hadn’t looked at the financial section from yesterday’s edition.//

You don't need to say twice that it's from yesterday.

>Her expression was somewhere between concern and caution.//

It's fairly abstract to mention the mood, because there are lots of ways that could look. Describe it. Show me your vision of it and let me deduce the emotion on my own. If you do it well, I'll get where you want me to go.

>keeping his eyes fixated on the newspaper//

That's not really a place for "fixated." "Fixed" is more what you want.

>Grand paused for a moment//

>He paused for a moment//
These are in consecutive sentences.

>The percolator began to whistle quietly, signifying that the coffee was almost ready.//

Don't over-explain things. Let the facts speak for themselves. Even if I didn't know a percolator whistled, his reaction to it will tell me.

>he could tell that she wasn’t too pleased with his appraisal of the significance of the dreams//

How so? Let me see what she's doing. Don't just sum it up and draw the conclusion for me. It's less real that way.

>that family?//

When you italicize something for emphasis, it's preferred to include any question marks or exclamation marks on it in the italics.

>with eyes full some emotion he couldn’t quite place. Shock? Pity? Guilt?//

Missing word. Also, this places you well within the realm of a limited narrator. The narration is vocalizing Grand's thoughts for him. This really is the key to those moments of boring routine. Show his inner turmoil through the tone the narration takes, and contrast that with the boring exterior. Use the limited narrator to its full advantage.

>handful//

What's that to a pony?

>he was the one that broke//

When referring to a sentient being, it's preferred to use "who" instead of "that."

>No, he couldn’t do that.//

This scene is doing a much better job of keeping tension and interest up through the narrative tone. If you can make the previous scene more like this one, it'd do a lot better.

>They’d understand, he thought.//

Okay, if you're going to have the narrator state his thoughts for him, then it's odd to also have quoted thoughts. They create different levels of distance from the reader.

>rummaging through his bag//

>rummaged through them//
These occur close enough together for a word that unusual that it feels repetitive.

>Dear Grand Pear,//

The bbcode you're using to do this formatting puts a bar down the left side, which just looks strange. Check out the bbcode guide on the site. It supports a couple different indent ones which would probably create the effect you want.

>I’ll be taking custody of the foals//

Not sure she'd actually use that term. Big Mac wasn't very young anymore when Apple Bloom was born. I don't know that he could be called a foal at that point. Applejack, maybe.

>He’d been so dumbfounded that he forgot to breathe//

You mentioned a full minute going by. You might want to shorten that. A minute's past "forgetting to breathe" territory.

>His throat began to tighten up, and he knew that it would only be a few seconds before his eyes flooded with tears.//

The limited narration (and his quoted thoughts, for that matter) sound rather sedate for what should be a big emotional moment. Compare to that bit I excerpted earlier, where Grad was asking questions in the narration. Let the narration carry his mood and show his passion.

>eased, and the tightness that he felt throughout his body began to ease//

Close word repetition.

>around the store//

>everything around him//
>all around him//
All that is in the same paragraph.

>with it out of his sight//

"It" is singular, but he knocked more than one thing to the floor.

>the payment method; in this case, a money order//

The semicolon isn't used right, since what comes after it couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>placed a single twenty-bit coin on the counter while Grand placed//

Close word repetition.

>He could easily see that she wasn’t so convinced.//

How so? What does she do?

I'm still seeing that if a paragraph contains dialogue, it always begins with the dialogue. A little variety always helps.

>one of the taps on the bar//

It's self-evident that's where they'd be, plus it's already the third time in the chapter you've used "bar."

>no-time//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>still didn’t feel any different otherwise//

The "still" and "otherwise" are fairly redundant, and then you have another "still" in the next sentence.

>it sucked//

Kind of odd seeing someone of his generation using that term but it's up to you.

>Grand paused to pound another shot down.//

But Gerry cut him off, and you haven't said anything since then to change that.

>Not that it phased Grand.//

fazed

>the fu- from//

Use a proper dash for cutoffs and asides, not a hyphen.

>funeral…” Grand trailed off//

It's pretty redundant to narrate trailing off when the punctuation already indicates it.

>Gerry looked away from Grand.//

When did he look at Grand? Last time you said what he was doing, he was keeping himself occupied so he didn't have to pay attention.

>fuzziness in his sight//

You just mentioned "fuzz" two paragraphs ago.

>I screwed up, Gerry.”//

When his dialogue bridges across paragraphs, you need to renew the opening quotes on each paragraph.

>Even through the fuzz in his mind//

More fuzz already?

>as he sat on his cold metal bench, watching as dozens of ponies rushed back and forth//

It's really clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence. They fight each other for setting the timeline.

>So long as he avoided letting anypony smell the liquor on his breath and walked a straight line, he’d be home free.//

I don't get this. They won't let drunk ponies ride the train? Why not? It isn't dangerous.

>quickly. He’d still have time to grab a quick//

>a bit too far inward, and he stumbled a bit//
Repetition.

>The mare in the window looked on with disinterest as Grand turned away from her slowly and began walking away slowly at first, and then began to increase his pace, his steps becoming more and more wobbly and disconcerted as he picked up speed.//

The way this is phrased, she keeps watching him the whole time, but I don't know how he could tell that.

>back over onto his back//

Repetition. You also use "still" twice in this paragraph. You have 22 uses of "still" in the chapter, which is tending toward overuse.

>“What?”

Include the question mark in the italics.

>laying back flat on her head//

You need "lying" here.

>wrapped him in a tight hug//

>wrapped tightly in each other’s embrace//
These are only two paragraphs apart.

>Her embrace was just about the only place he felt safe enough to let it out.//

The line break is off here.

I'll just check another couple of words that it feels like I'm seeing a lot in this chapter. Look: 25, just: 32.

>Péra wrapped a hoof around his shoulders//

And now more wrapping.

>detailed a lot of the little details//

That seems self-explanatory.

>In a couple of hours time//

This should be phrased as a possessive: In a couple of hours' time.

>The gate swung open, its lightly rusted hinges groaning quietly as they were brought to life. Grand Pear stepped through the entrance, his hooves crunching in the gravel as he made his way slowly forward. His legs were killing him after the walk to get here, each step hindered by stiffness in his joints, but it wasn’t quite time to rest.//

Look how repetitive your sentence structure is here.
1. main clause, absolute phrase, dependent "as" clause
2. main clause, absolute phrase, dependent "as" clause
3. main clause, absolute phrase, dependent clause

>patches of snow left over, but those would be gone in just a few days. Patches//

Repetition. I'm not even pointing out all the instances of repetition, just examples.

>there was one single wilting red flower already needed trimming//

Missing word.

>carefully-trimmed//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb.

>were only starting to bloom//

>was just starting to sprout//
These are in consecutive paragraphs.

>just wasn’t much work to do to the grave. In just a few minutes, it already looked just//

See what I mean about overusing "just"? It isn't only the raw numbers, but how they can tend to turn up in clusters.

>But it’s too late. You’re gone, and there’s nothing I can do.”//

You need opening quotes on this, since it starts a new paragraph.

>the growing chorus of sobs//

Don't oversell this. Power often comes through being understated.

This isn't a bad redemption-type story, but it should be obvious from what I had to mention multiple times what the problems are. There's lots of repetition, and the first few scenes of chapter 1 are boring. What I think it's still missing, though, is more about Pera. She encouraged Grand to visit the Apples, he seemed receptive to it, and then we skip ahead in time to where she's dead, and he still has never gone for vague reasons.

It's like that sobbing at the end. There's more than is required to make the story work. Yeah, maybe you're trying to fit canon, but even that's easy to get around. Maybe Pera goes with him, but he didn't expect to be approached by the Apples, so he got caught by surprise without her. That'd work fine. Throwing in needless tragedy makes a story harder to take as realistic, and thus it can easily have the opposite effect than the author intended: it makes the story less sad because it's harder to relate to.

At the very least, we need some more concrete reason why Grand delayed so much longer (I don't even get a sense of how much later it is), and then consider how much it actually serves the plot to have Pera dead. It doesn't change his attitude toward his daughter, after all.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2948

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>pairs - including//

Please use a proper dash for asides and interruptions.

>The woman//

You've now identified her as Twilight, so why persist in using vague descriptors for her?

>it’s feeble magic depleted//

Its/it's confusion.

>here,” Discord eyed Twilight with his piercing gaze//

Your speech tag has no speaking verb. You can't tack just any action onto dialogue with a comma.

>Princess?//

When you italicize a word for emphasis, it's preferred to include any exclamation marks or question marks on it in the italics.

>Finally, she turned to Discord and nodded.//

This is the last sentence of the first scene and about a quarter of the way through the story. It's also the first narrative sentence that doesn't start with the subject. It's a very aesthetic thing, but the sentence structures in this story are very plodding and repetitive. SO many of them start with the subject, and so many of them are about the same length. You have to throw a little variety in there just to give the story a pleasant flow. That's my biggest issue with the story so far: it doesn't have any sort of lyrical quality to the narration. It reads more like a list of actions.

>Discord and Twilight sat across from one another at the dining room table. Two cups of steaming hot tea sat in front of them. Twilight cupped the beverage in her hands and watched Discord.//

Try to avoid close repetition of words, too. This happened in a few places. In this example, you have two uses of "sat" in consecutive sentences, and two uses of some form of "cup."

>His signature goatee survived the transition nicely//

You have a bit of dissonance in the narrative voice. Basically, you need to decide whether you want a limited narrator who's telling the story through Twilight's eyes or a limited narrator who's external to everyone. This sounds very much like one of Twilight's thoughts, so would be limited, yet the story started out sounding very omniscient, giving descriptions Twilight herself wouldn't make, like referring to her as "the woman" and listing details about her jewelry.

>“So…” she traced the lines on the table with her eyes.//

You keep using non-speaking actions as dialogue tags.

>“About six months or so.” Discord said matter-of-factly.//

That first period needs to be a comma.

>... Ten//

Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis.

>They gave me money and sometimes food. Never more than enough to last the day, though.//

Missing your closing quotation marks.

You're using a ton of ellipses in Twilight's dialogue. They're like seasonings. A little adds flavor, but too much is overwhelming. You want the reader remembering what happened, not that he saw a bunch of ellipses.

>Twilight choked back a sob as a tear slide down her cheek.//

Three things: 1) that's a very abrupt change of mood, from being not even upset to full-on sobbing, 2) there's a typo, and 3) that single tear is about the most cliched thing possible.

>Her eyes were red, puffy, and wet.//

Going back to perspective, if you're using a limited narrator in her viewpoint, she might know her eyes were wet, but she can't see them. How would she know they were red and puffy?

>Humans and Ponies//

Not sure why you're capitalizing those.

>She ran her fingers over several textbooks of various subjects.//

This is a symptom of a larger issue. When you leave things so vague like this, it has very limited impact. Give a couple of examples, attach some emotion to them. Maybe one was from the calculus class where someone asked her on a date for the first time, maybe another was from the English class where she couldn't bring herself to read a poem she'd written, so the teacher did it for her, and everyone loved it. Little windows into her life like that with the kinds of details to bring it alive are how you really engage a reader. A couple of brief examples will always be more powerful than a generalization. This goes for whoever her romantic interest is. We've just gotten generic statements that he looked out for her, but that doesn't paint a picture at all. Let me see a couple of times he did so I get to witness them, not simply have to accept the narrator's assurances that they were appropriately touching.

>concealed the slumbering form of a young girl//

This is very external again. She's not going to refer to her own daughter as "a young girl" in her own thoughts.

>You're also a grandmother now!//

That's a strange sentiment. Celestia isn't her mother, and nowhere in the story has she expressed that she considers Celestia like one, so this is just coming out of nowhere.

>but let's try this…//

It's far less reasonable to put an ellipsis in something she's written that something she says. In speech, people trail off for various reasons, none of which apply to writing, and it's not a very deliberate thing. But in a letter, she'd have to make a conscious decision to put the three dots on the page, and she must think she's accomplishing something by doing so, but I can't imagine what that is. It's a very iffy prospect to put speech affectations into something a character has written.

>Celestia paced relentlessly across the stone floor of her courtroom.//

Wait, we were just on Earth. Why are you skipping over to Equestria? That's a very jarring transition. There are ways to make this kind of thing work, but to suddenly drop it in just makes things a little confusing.

>the wailing alicorn//

If you go over the top, you risk making the emotion feel unrealistic. Where tragedy is concerned, less is often more. Giving the character an extreme reaction doesn't make it more sad. It just makes it less authentic.

>Give my regards to all of my friends, my parents, Shining, Cadance, and Spike.//

And this is the bit that the story never explains. She's known Spike for somewhere around 20 years. She's been on Earth for 10. I would think she'd have a greater attachment to Spike than this, but she glosses over it like she can just send a hello to him, and he'll understand.

>each of you are//

"Each" is considered singular, so use "is."

This is an interesting idea for a story, but the narration never really decides what it wants to be, it's very repetitive structurally (to get a feel for that, try reading it out loud, especially if you skip the dialogue), and Twilight seems very dismissive at the end about what she's giving up in Equestria. Part of engaging with a character is getting involved with her struggle, but we don't see it here. Twilight learns that Discord can take her back, he says he needs a decision, and we cut to her calmly informing Celestia of what she decided. All that turmoil occurred off camera, yet that's what gives the story its strength. You're asking the reader to come up with that investment for you, but it's the author's job to show his vision of it. It's another example of how you diminish the story's power by sticking to vagaries instead of letting me witness the key moments that form the story's emotional basis. If it's important to the story's emotional arc, don't skip past it and make me imagine how it must have gone.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2955

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

There are a couple of impressions I have immediately. The writing's good, but there are some quirks and stylistic things that detract from it.

You use Radagast's name so frequently that it gets off-putting. In the first scene, he's the only character there, so it's not ambiguous to use "he." It can sound forced to use names more often than is necessary.

The next thing is the preponderance of "to be" verbs. Right away, your paragraphs have so many instances of "was." Between that and "wasn't," you have 95 of them in the first chapter alone, and that just continues. That's a very boring verb, as nothing happens. It's not practical to remove them all, but you really should be using active verbs where you can. It makes the story more interesting. You use other forms of it as well, but for "was/wasn't" alone there's one about every 3 sentences. That's not terrible, but they tend to turn up in clumps, which makes the story's momentum stagnate.

I also don't get a good impression of Radagast's size. He's small enough that the rabbits can pull him on a sled, but I don't know that a couple dozen could pull a full-grown human. So is he not much bigger than the rabbits? Just having some sort of reference where he's near something of a known size would give a better picture of him. Or just saying he's a human, I guess.

>the wizard//

You're taking a fairly shallow limited narration in Radagast's perspective, so the narration is essentially his train of thought. Why would he refer to himself with such an external phrasing like this? People don't do that.

>became more dense, and shrubs started to become//

Try to avoid repeating a word close together like that, unless it's a themtic repetition.

>he could see//

>The wizard knew//
This is a subtle thing, but a limited narrator is so connected to the character that they have the same perceptions and knowledge. So it's not necessary to say he could see something. Just the fact that the narrator describes it means that he saw it. And just because the narrator says something means that he knew it. When you force in these perception and knowledge verbs, you push the narrator farther from the character, which works against the point of having a limited narrator.

>then he lay still.

>
>Radagast lay on his back on the ground//
Close word repetition again. I won't keep marking these, so keep an eye out for them.

>Wasn’t that the way the storm was coming from?//

You've spent the whole scene in Radagast's perspective so far. Why are you switching over the the rabbits' perspective? And you don't even stay there.

>brusque pace//

I have to think you meant brisk.

>Gandalf had been paying him a visit//

Another thing about "to be" verbs is that they're often used unnecessarily as auxiliary verbs. If you changed this to "Gandalf had paid him a visit," what do you lose?

>someone— dangerous?//

Extraneous space after the dash.

You have lots of questionable semicolons. Ideally, you should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete.

>the pony had no idea what the birds’ names where.//

Typo. And it's getting really obtrusive here that you're apparently taking her perspective, yet you have her refer to herself as "the pony." The scene started out in a strange conversational-sounding narrator with no identifiable perspective, and he's still trying to be omniscient while taking on Fluttershy's stream of thought at times.

>she realized that her eyes were unseeing

>
>“I-I can’t see!” she said//
That's pretty redundant. It's also really odd that this wasn't the very first things she noticed. It's not like she'd been holding her eyes shut.

>The pony felt worry and anxiety leap upon her every nerve.//

You really need to avoid always directly identifying emotion like this. I don't doubt this is consistent with Tolkein, but it does stand out as not being very engaging. Show me how she acts and looks, or what she thinks. It doesn't connect me to the character to know abstractly that she's worried and anxious.

>But the sounds of her friends’ names where the only things accompanying her.//

Same typo as before. You seem to have a consistent issue with where and were.

>The pony, scared as she was, forced her to concentrate//

That "her" should be a "herself."

>the pony realized that she wasn’t where she thought she was.

>
>“I am not in Ponyville anymore, am I?”//
Redundant again.

>A single tear rolled from the corner of her hazy eye.//

This is one of the most cliched things possible.

>in the merciless nature//

That's just a strange phrasing.

>At the rim of the black circle of burnt leaves, two squirrels gathered and looked curiously at the pony.//

This is strange with the perspective. You'd apparently been using Fluttershy as a limited narrator, but now you're having the narrator describe things she can't see.

>The wind started blowing fierce.//

fiercely

>She couldn’t fight or flight//

In that syntax, you'd use flee, not flight.

>unconsciousness pony//

You have a noun where you need an adjective.

>where the scared little rabbits were going to; back to his home.//

You should get rid of that first "to," and a colon would be more appropriate than a semicolon, since you're defining or clarifying their destination.

>thick, purple carpet//

Just because you have multiple adjectives doesn't mean you need a comma. When they describe completely different aspects of something, like these do, they're hierarchical adjectives and don't use a comma.

>Luna’s full moon//

It's very cliched to refer to the sun and moon as belonging to the princesses.

>but Rarity’s reaction had to do with her mane//

I don't understand what you mean Rarity's doing here.

Let me back up to an earlier sentence:
>A collective moan indicated that nopony was yet able to talk//
Rainbow Dash is, because she'd already spoken. However, the narration seems to be taking her perspective in this scene, and then this sentence works. She's worried about everyone else, and none of them can talk yet, and it's natural she might not include herself in this statement. So far, so good. But if you're in Rainbow Dash's perspective, it needs to sound like her as well. To make an extreme example, say you have Apple Bloom as your perspective character. It would feel out of place to have her limited narration (essentially her stream of thought) go on with very purple and florid language. Same thing here. A lot of this scene just doesn't sound like word and phrase choices that Dash would make.

>the alicorn//

And you're doing this same thing you did last chapter. This is a very impersonal reference. Dash knows Twilight well, so why would she choose to describe her this way? Do you think of your best friend as "the person" in your own thoughts? That's how unnatural this is.

>arc//

You keep referring to this, but it has a meaning related to lightning and electricity as well, and since those things are also used in this part of the story, it gets confusing. I thought you actually meant there was an electrical arc in the room. You might want to use "arch" to describe the piece of the machine.

>nothing to severe//

Too/to confusion.

>done a few paces//

That's a strange phrasing.

>Rainbow Dash let out a sigh of annoyance.//

Really, really, really try to avoid using these "in/of/with emotion" phrases. For one thing, it's better to have the character demonstrate that emotion than to simply have the narrator state it, but these particular phrases are usually redundant with something already in the sentence. The sigh in context can already paint her as annoyed. If you don't think it's enough, you could add a bit more body language, but it's apparent she's annoyed anyway, without you having to point it out.

>A search it is, then.//

This seems awfully stoic and calm for Twilight.

>reckon//

Kind of an odd word choice for Pinkie.

>Although Starlight Glimmer had a dozen more questions to ask Twilight, she saw that her master wouldn’t say anything more. Twilight hated drawing conclusions on suspicions.//

Okay, I can at least see the value in changing from Dash's perspective to Twilight's. At the beginning of the scene, Dash was the only one who was aware enough to witness what was happening. Then you want the camera to stay behind after Dash leaves, so you go to Twilight. But why do you need to go to Starlight here?

Why are these two going on and on about the machine being destroyed when Twilight's already acknowledged that Fluttershy is gone? Isn't that the more immediate concern?

>When the rubble was cleared and sorted, Twilight—with pain in her heart—decided to break a few dangling cables and sharp pieces of metal off the machine//

More unusual sentence elements stand out when repeated, so you don't want them to become writing quirks. This is already the third narrative aside of the paragraph.

>Only when that was done did the two unicorns proceed to cleaning up the study.//

This paragraph is just loaded with passive voice. That's not a very interesting structure to read.

>called: The Chronicles of Starswirl the Bearded Volume One//

You don't need that colon.

>disappointment was etched on everypony’s faces//

I haven't been marking every instance of this I see. In fact, I'm not marking many of them at all. But aside from not demonstrating the emotion, it's repetitive with Starlight being described as having a "hint of disappointment" just 3 paragraphs ago.

>I’m terribly sorry, twilight//

Capitalization.

>taking the word//

I have no idea what this means. Is it a foreign idiom?

>but neither of us has been able to find the poor darling//

The use of "neither" implies 2, but 4 of them have been looking.

>although the alicorn did her best to hide her lack of it//

And now you've gone back to Twilight's perspective. Plus used a reference that doesn't work well with it.

>as she saw that there were now two ponies missing. “Hasn’t Pinkie Pie returned yet?”//

But you haven't mentioned Dash coming back yet. Is she there?

>Fluttershy’s cabin//

It's not really a cabin. I've most often seen it described as a cottage.

>now completed circle//

When you use a multi-word phrase like "now completed" as a single modifier for a word that follows it, hyphenate the phrase.

>noticing the alicorn’s strange reaction//

Now I have no idea what perspective you're using. Twilight wouldn't describe her own reaction as strange, but you haven't taken on anyone else's viewpoint.

>opposite of the thrones//

When you're using "opposite" to describe a physical location, you typically don't use "of" with it.

>I will first tell you what the machine is and what it does//

This is just the portal machine, right? Don't they already know what it does?

>receiving many odd stared//

Typo.

>Rarity wanted to take the word.//

There's that strange idiom.

>one of Moondancer’s book//

books

>magically-amplified//

This is actually the exception. You don't ned hyphens in two-word phrases when the first word is an -ly adverb.

>Pinkie’s eyes tripled in size, and she munched away another cupcake without taking her eyes off Twilight Sparkle, captivated by the tale.//

By proximity, it sounds like Twilight is the one captivated by the tale.

>I had teleported Frodo Baggins, a character from the book, The Lord of the Rings, written by J.R.R. Tolkien, into Equestria using the machine.//

Wait, what? Why not just have Middle Earth be a real alternate universe? What does it add to have it be a fictional world? It's kind of an odd choice, since MLP is itself fictional, or are you playing it as real? And is Tolkein a pony author? Or is he from the EqG world?

>Suddenly, she wished that nopony would be looking at her.//

Now you're in Dash's head. Plus it's pointless to have her and Twilight both bring up that they had some great adventures, then say absolutely nothing about them. It's a useless tease.

>phase two. The face//

Typo.

>reaction..//

Extra period.

>But whether her pony friends were really indignant, she couldn’t tell.//

This would seem to be in Starlight's perspective. Really, jumping around to different characters like this is fine in an omniscient narration, and if that's what you want to use, then just be careful to keep opinions out of the narration and don't express character thought through narration. And in that case, those references like "the alicorn" would also work, provided you don't us them too often. So it's probably easiest to make sure your narration stays omniscient.

>“It would have been nice to get rid of you for a while.”//

Why in the world does Rarity say this? It's just mean, and it's for no reason.

>a poor little filly//

And this is the kind of thing I'm talking about when I say the narration sounds limited. This is Dash's impression and thought process made into narration. When the narrator states Dash's opinion as if his own, he essentially becomes her. If you want it to stay omniscient, you have to avoid that. Keep the narration factual and attribute opinions explicitly to the characters.

>ever-slinking pile//

That means the pile is sneaking around. I have to think you meant "shrinking."

>Even Starlight had no words for such a theory.//

Why is this so hard for her to comprehend? Isn't it the most obvious explanation?

>Resting two hooves on the table, Twilight’s head was flopped down upon them//

This says Twilight's head was resting two hooves on the table.

>Sometimes her shoulder shocked//

I'm guessing you meant "shook."

>she was not going to leave her friend down//

let her friend down

>She had taken a few days off the weather squad//

She had taken a few days off from the weather squad

>start from scrap//

You might have meant "start from scratch," though it could have a valid meaning as is.

>Feeling the burden of guilt weighing on her shoulders, Twilight’s head dropped again//

Similar to before, this says her head felt the burden of guilt, not that Twilight did.

>No silence this time, but a flurry of questions, aimed directly at Starlight Glimmer.//

It's also sentence fragments like this that create a conversational tone and suggest a limited rather than an omniscient narration.

>Not ponies or zebra’s or griffons//

Why is one of those a possessive?

>East//

Why do you keep capitalizing this direction?

Well, with all this discussion about where Dash wanted to go in the books, it's more justified that it's a fictional world, but it does beg the question: we've seen in canon that they have magic comics that can draw you in to experience the adventure. It's a shorter path to having such books as well than to say Twilight built a machine that can take them into fictional worlds. She's pretty much reinventing something that already exists.

>I don’t want to tell too much about it.//

I don't understand why she wouldn't want to. She's not trying to keep a secret.

>Sugarcube//

That wouldn't be capitalized, as it's a generic term of endearment.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2956

>>2955
>tiny, wooden//
Hierarchical adjectives again. You don't need the comma.

>one of them had fallen down and spilled honey and broken combs on the grass//

You mention this after saying they're all shaking and shuddering, so is the broken one doing that too?

I'm not familiar enough with Tolein to know whether he uses an omniscient narrator with personality, so it may be you're just doing the same as he did. But there's a bit if a disconnect. Take this line from the beginning of chapter 3:
>From a small clearing arose a tiny, wooden cabin, barely standing out against the surrounding pine trees.//
This sounds like the point of view of someone not familiar with the place. A lot of the first paragraph seems so. It's definitely opinionated, but it's a stretch to say it's Radagast's opinion. Then later we get these:
>Yes, she was still breathing. He put a hand on her breast. Yes, she her heart was still beating.//
That's directly from Radagast's thoughts, not some external narrator, so it's inconsistent in how it uses the narrative voice.

>Folding back the wing, Radagast turned around and began pacing to and fro/

Note that participial phrases, like "folding back the wing," mean that the action they describe is simultaneous to the part of the sentence they're attached to. So you have him folding back the wing at the same time he's pacing, where it's more likely he'd do them one after the other.

>A few birds came flying down their branches//

Missing a "from."

>put in on the table//

Typo.

>and stared at the wizard with tilted heads//

They just did that 2 paragraphs ago.

>He searched for the word, ‘wing,’ but found nothing useful. Then he searched for, ‘bird,’//

You don't need the comma before either quote.

>Radagast had all gained them//

A more typical phrasing would be "Radagast had gained them all."

>probably to the vegetable garden to save what could be saved from the destructive storm//

I thought they didn't like getting wet.

>she felt panic flash its tendrils around her chest//

You've been staying with Radagast's thoughts and impression, but this is definitely hers. There's no way he would know this, at least as you've stated it. It's no adeduction he's making from evidence; it's just stated as a fact, which would require him to read her mind.

>the yellow pony//

And if you are going to her perspective for some vital reason, it'd be odd fer her to describe herself this way. People don't think of themselves in so external terms.

>Grabbing some lettuce, some carrots, and filling a bowl with water from a barrel, he returned and put both food and drink down next to the bed.//

Here's another spot where participial phrases are synchronizing things that shouldn't be.

>she could see again//

You're definitely back in her viewpoint, as Radagast never knew that she couldn't see.

>the rain lost its their cloudy allies//

Extraneous word.

>that, ”//

Extraneous space.

>already having displaying//

The verb form is off. It'd be "having displayed."

>It reminded her of home and all of the other animals she called her friends.//

I can't keep marking these. Suffice it to say you need to get a handle on keeping a consistent perspective or on keeping the narration omniscient.

>smell atop the smell//

Watch that close repetition.

>“Gandalf, on the other hand”—Radagast closed his eyes and let out a chuckle—“is//

Note that the difference between the placement of dashes you use here and putting them with the speech is whether he stops speaking for the action. The one you've chosen means the speech doesn't stop, so he keeps speaking through the chuckling. Make sure that's what you intended.

>Saruman the White//

Note how you capitalize the colors with the names, yet when he first gave his name as "Radagast the brown," he didn't.

>the centaur which//

When talking about sentient creatures, it's preferred to use "who" intead of "that" or "which."

>It has simply… vanished and forgotten.//

The verb forms don't quite make sense there. The ring has vanished, that's true, but it hasn't forgotten. It's been forgotten.

>d-d-dark lord//

Why isn't it capitalized here?

>to whom we are speaking and listening to//

Since you have that first "to," you don't need the second one.

Here's the thing that confuses me a bit. Horses exist in our world, so we came up with MLP as a fantasy version of that. But how does someone in Equestria invent all these humanoid races when such things don't really exist in Equestria? Minotaurs aren't that far off, but still, whereas elves and dwarves and orcs and such are variations on humans, they aren't variations on something they'd be familiar with. Not that this is something the reader can't just accept and move past, but it does strike me as a little odd. It's just another thing poking me in the brain and making me wonder why you didn't just make Middle Earth an alternate universe they can travel to instead of a fictional one.

>Forgotten, or reluctant?//

You're definitely in Fluttershy's perspective here, which makes the following problematic:
>Having read only a small portion of the trilogy, Fluttershy hadn’t reached the part of the book were Radagast was mentioned—which wasn’t long at all. Barely a few sentences were written about Radagast the Brown in Tolkien’s trilogy, but that didn’t stop Radagast from existing right before Fluttershy’s nose.//
If the limited narrator is in Fluttershy's perspective, he can't know things she doesn't. Yet he's clearly giving information on part of the books that she hasn't gotten to.

>dug through the dusty cloths, digging//

Repetition.

>a droning cadence; “I want to go home, I want to go home, I want to go home.”//

That should be a colon.

>Sitting down on the bed//

This makes it sound like she had already gotten up and is now sitting down.

>she saw the massive trees looming over Rhosgobel. Pine trees, Fluttershy saw, but they were much bigger than any pine tree she’d ever seen//

That's three forms of "see" in just 23 words. And there are three others in the same paragraph.

>Alexander flew up and landed on Fluttershy’s head, looking outside as well and greeting the morning with the same feeling of peace as Fluttershy. His concentration wasn’t as long as the pony’s, however, and he soon flew off again and towards the kitchen, attracted by the scent of tasty treats.//

I don't know why you bother going to the bird's perspective. You only stay there for two sentences, and nothing important gets revealed while you're there.

>not— I//

Don't leave space around an em dash.

>It was strange how she felt both outlandish and familiar at the same time. But she felt good. The familiarity and resemblances gave her some comfort, and she could feel that from the inside.//

Here, you directly use a form of "feel" three times. It's a verb to avoid anyway, as it's better to demonstrate how she feels instead of telling me, and to do so repeatedly over the course of only two sentences is even more something to avoid.

>He grabbed his tea and took another sip.//

This is a very, very common trap writers fall into. When two characters are sharing a drink, they lose all imagination and can't think of anything to have the characters do with their beverages beyond some variation on "take another sip." People do lots of things with their drinks besides this. Surely you can think of some more.

>vertically from East to West//

Wouldn't that be horizontally? Unless she's looking at the map sidways, but you don't say that.

>T-t-that//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat. "That" doesn't begin with a "t" sound.

>Indeed you aren’t.//

That's not really an appropriate response to what she said.

>and took a sip of tea//

And there you go with the sipping again. That's all they've done since they poured it. And even that didn't really get a mention.

>they’re called, pegasi//

No reason to have a comma there.

>earth-ponies and unicorns. Earth ponies//

Inconsistent dash use. Canon doesn't put one there.

>princess Celestia//

The title would be capitalized when attached to a name.

>similar, Don’t they//

Extraneous capitalization.

>revalidate//

rehabilitate

>I rather stay on the ground//

I'd

>She’s even wrote//

Either "she even wrote" or "she's even written."

It's a little curious that Fluttershy only discusses the other Elements and Spike. It's not like they're her only friends. She knows Bulk Biceps, Tree Hugger, and Discord. She's a frequent customer of Aloe and Lotus. She has Angel Bunny. She has parents and a brother.

>it has been awhile//

I won't go into the long explanation of why, but "a while" and "awhile" aren't interchangeable. The former is a noun, and the latter is an adverb. You need the noun form here.

>errant//

errand

>T-that//

Again, consider what sound she'd actually repeat.

>He could read her big blue eyes like a map. He found them the easiest eyes he had ever read, and he had read countless animals’ eyes and deciphered countless emotions.//

That's very repetitive phrasing.

>That was the way he liked to think; while on the move.//

That semicolon should be a colon. Not only are you defining or clarifying something, but you don't have an independent clause after it.

>strange, pink, column//

Hierarchical adjectives again, and you never put a comma between the last adjective and what they describe.

>although their faces looked much the same as everypony else’s//

Then how is it that this narrator, whomever it's supposed to represent, can distinguish between excitement and amazement?

>climbing frame//

Very minor thing, but your reading audience will be primarily American, and most Americans won't know this term. Here, it's called a jungle gym or monkey bars. That's up to you, though.

>pouring down the heavens//

Missing a "from."

>a rainbow-and-cloud; Dash’s cutie mark//

Another semicolon that should be a colon.

>hues of color//

Redundant.

>Rainbow Dash didn’t saw her//

Typo.

>Fluttershy was running straight at the machine//

I don't understand why she would do this, unless she wasn't paying attention to where she was going. And if that's the case, the limited narrator using her perspective also shouldn't know where she's going.

>if she’d abort//

The tense is off here. Use "if she aborted."

>pacing>[ 2//

You have this at the end of the chapter for some reason. I assume it's unintentional.

>as predicted by the story//

Well, it's less predicted than mandated, right? THat begs the question of whether the story can turn out any way other than how it's written. Yes, Fluttershy could get hurt or killed, but in a global sense, th good guys are still going to win, I presume.

>making sure that The Lord of the Rings, was always within reach//

No reason to have that comma.

>the only sound coming from the library were//

Mixing singular/plural there, plus shortly after, there's a close repetition of "sound," and there are a lot of uses of "had been" lately.

>reckon’//

What's the apostrophe for? There aren't any missing letters.

>princess Celestia and princess Luna//

Capitalize titles when they're on names like that.

>He flopped the stationary down//

"Stationary" means something doesn't move. You want "stationery."

>let his green, slit eyes run over the words//

Why are you bothering to describe his eyes here? The reader already knows what they look like, and it's not even pertinent to what's happening.

>Princess Celestia would recognize the letter the moment she’d receive it.//

Typical verb form would be "she received it" here.

>princess Celestia’s//

Capitalization.

>looked at the ponies one by one, looking//

Repetitive.

>princess Celestia//

Capitalization. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

>The other ponies followed her flight with an unsure expression.//

All of them had just one expression?

>going limp of exhaustion//

From, not of.

>powerful

>power
>powered
>powerful//
These are all in the same paragraph.

>Someway//

That should be two words.

>Shining armor//

Capitalization.

>cramped train coupon//

I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. I guess it's an expression that doesn't translate well?

>Don’t worry Spike.//

>So what are we going to do Twilight?//
Missing a comma for direct address.

>Rarity was looking forward to go to the brilliant Crystal Empire//

The verb form there should be "going."

>men will start to call it, ‘Mirkwood.’//

You don't need that comma.

>Not only the nerves//

I don't understand what this is trying to say.

>i-lanOw[1 2//

And you've got another one of these strange things at the end of a chapter.

At this point, I've read enough of the story to get a flavor for the characterization and writing quality. I'll be at this for months if I continue giving detailed feedback, so I'm just going to skim the rest to get an idea for the plot and make sure I don't see any problems with that. I'll still pull out any detailed things I see, but I won't be reading carefully enough to find that many.

Jay Bear!cSWoEWwnvICountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2957

Howdy! I’ve got most of the rewriting done (nothing posted yet), but I have a few follow-up questions. I’ve put the meatier questions about the “gimmick chapters” at the end.

>Losing your whole family// Wait, what happened to Pound Cake?

>an empty honeycomb lying on the ground// Wait, that's an odd thing to have just randomly lying around a shed.
Wasn’t sure if I needed to change anything about these lines (although “Losing your whole family” got rewritten as part of other tweaks). My objective was to leave clues to readers about some of the important differences in this alt universe, but in a way that’s natural to the characters of that alt universe. Are these too distracting where they are? If so, I’ll throw them into exposition.

>Now that I'm significantly into chapter 4, i have to wonder what the point is. [Cup Cake, Apple Bloom, and Fluttershy backstories.]

I know it’s been two weeks, but do you remember where this felt like it became too much? If it’s in Apple Bloom’s backstory, I think I can fix that easily. If it was during Cup Cake’s service, I’ll need to rethink this chapter. My main objective with the service was to give the reader a break from the heavier stuff before and after. The information is important, too, but I can present it more efficiently if the current fluffiness is getting in the way.

>There used to be a brash, energetic, and most of all, happy pony, and she lived right here.// All of this is pretty nebulous…

I may have boxed myself in here. The situation would be pretty nebulous to Dash, and while the real cause is revealed in a later chapter, it’s implausible she’d figure it out by this point. I tried rewriting this section so Dash develops an incomplete theory of what’s wrong based on other parts of her life to at least flesh things out. However, there hasn’t been any reason to distrust her POV so far, so I’m worried the reader is going to take her theory at face value rather than as another clue to the real cause. I’m not sure how to fix this.

Here’s the meat:
>Gimmick chapters
One of my objectives with changing the writing style for the labyrinths is to show how much control the witches can exert on reality. It’s not just that ponies in a labyrinth see crazy stuff; the rules of the world are so different that this crazy stuff naturally exists (it doesn’t really work in the alliteration labyrinth, but I liked it in the circus labyrinth). I’m surely gambling with the reader’s patience by writing all this weirdness, but showing this control, and how the protagonists deal with it, is important. However, I couldn’t find a natural way to maintain that sense of the witch’s control when changing these parts to be from a pony’s POV. It felt like the POV character was under mind control, but could ignore it when it was convenient.
As an experiment, I rewrote the alliteration part to read like a fairy tale told from the witch’s perspective, and I think it works. It’s much more comprehensible and does a better job of showing the witch control reality by replacing the alliteration with fairy tale styles and tropes. Looking ahead, establishing a rule that witch labyrinths are told from the witch’s perspective helps distinguish them from familiar labyrinths (which is important for the plot), and I can use it creatively in future chapters. So, beyond simply working, I think it would be an improvement to have all of these parts from the witches’ perspective.
Then again, until recently I thought “beside” and “besides” were the same word, so there’s a good chance I’m missing something obvious. Any advice based on what I wrote above, or would you need to see the final draft after I post it?

Specific labyrinth questions:
>It looks more like a screenplay, but I could also buy it as a libretto, which ties in to music.
This one is supposed to be a libretto, although heavily bastardized to remove the unnecessary parts of a typical libretto. I’m not sure why it’s coming across as a screenplay, though. Do I need to flag the songs?

>>The air was cold as stone// And since the encounter began, this is already the third time you've mentioned stone, and it's not done in a way that's obviously thematic, so it just comes across as an oversight.

I don’t actually have a question here, just wanted to point out this was a sestina. They can be beautiful when written by Ezra Pound, or awkward when written with the template I used. I was still proud of mine, though, and it [I]sucked[/i] when I realized it served no purpose here. I’m going to replace it with something that makes sense for the story (to me, at least).

Thank you again. This critique really helped me, both in terms of catching amateur mistakes and rethinking parts of the story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2958

>>2955
>>2956
>Radagast had laid awake//
The proper verb here is "had lain."

>disappearing from someplace and reappear//

Inconsistent verb forms.

>the magical energy the creature bears//

Kind of a confusing use of "bear," since you'd been referring to the animal a lot around here.

>ansi-languagv[* 2//

Yeah, just check the end of every chapter. You consistently have these.

>‘Daring Do and the Dragons’ Domain.’//

Book titles don't go in quotes. They get underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>“But… but what about princess—“//

>“But… but what about princess Ember,”//
"Princess" should be capitalized, as it's being used as a title attached to her name, even in the first one, since it's implied the name would follow.

>We’re going back home boys!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>thirdly—“Garble//

Missing space.

>for a moment, her crossed eyes looked much like Derpy’s//

How would Fluttershy know this? She could suppose it, but she can't see it to know for sure.

Okay, the song in chapter 8. It goes on for almost three full screens. I hope you know many readers will scroll past without reading it. If you want to have song lyrics, the best way to handle them is to: 1. Keep it short, 2. If it's long, break it up into small pieces with narration in between, 3. Keep it short, 4. If reading the lyrics is actually important to understanding the plot, make that very clear up front, 5. Keep it short. The reader's far more likely to read them if they fit on a single screen (or by #2, each chunk fits on a single screen) so he can see the end coming.

>Should… should I ask her?//

I really, really hope this has nothing to do with romance, because if it does, there's zero basis built up for it in the story.

>many confuses squawks//

Typo.

I'll reiterate at the end, but you have very unsteady perspective throughout the story. That's the biggest issue overall. But in this chapter, you have an example of how to do it right. Look at where you alternate scenes of Fluttershy teaching the birds to sing outside and Radagast writing his spell inside. In each of those scenes, you keep to a single perspective. But in the scenes where you have both together, the narration keeps hopping back and forth between seeing through Fluttershy's eyes and Radagast's. It'll express one's opinion and say something only one could perceive in the manner, and just a couple paragraphs later, shift over to the other. When you have a limited narrator (the narration will communicate opinions and impressions on behalf og the characters instead of being completely factual), you don't want to let the perspective waver so much. For the most part, you ought to keep to one perspective per scene.

>“Catering service!” A stallion shouted//

Capitalization.

>hay-sandwich//

Why would you hyphenate that? You don't for ham sandwich or turkey sandwich or anything else.

>Certainly, Miss//

"Miss" is a generic term when not attached to a name, so it wouldn't be capitalized.

>guardponies//

The human equivalent wedges an "s" in there, so I'd suggest "guardsponies ."

>Perhaps an image of Opal and I?//

That's actually a spot for "me" because it's the object of a preposition. Consider that "Opal and I" is the same thing as "we." Also consider that "Opal and me" is the same thing as "us." Which sounds correct, "Perhaps an image of we" or "Perhaps an image of us"?

>your royal highnesses//

Honorifics like this should be capitalized.

Oh, good. More song lyrics. And these go on for four screens. They're utterly pointless.

>and—“//

This is another thing you need to be careful of throughout the story. Certain things, including dashes, can turn smart quotes backward, as has happened here.

>—He stabbed a claw at Spike—//

Don't capitalize asides.

>one of which I might not return//

From, not of.

>had.Light//

Missing space.

>The other wraiths did one step back//

Kind of awkwardly phrased.

>Everywhere you looked//

Kind of odd to address the reader like this. Then there'a another "everywhere" later in the same paragraph.

>“Wait! Don’t go!”//

You have a couple of extra blank lines before this.

>My name is Pinkie Pie,//

Not more song lyrics. Jeez, these go on for 5 screens. People aren't going to read this.

>it only made the whole façade funnier//

If you have to tell the reader something is funny, it probably isn't.

>Bien sure//

I don't know what this is.

>with all logics//

"Logic" is a collective term. You don't need it to be plural.

>poor grey pegasus which just wanted to say sorry for real//

When referring to sentient beings, use "who" instead of "that" or "which."

>Come on you two//

Needs a comma for direct address.

This chapter is far longer than it needs to be. Most of Discord's comedy routine is pointless and (intentionally) unfunny, so there's not much to keep a reader's interest.

>They continued their way//

Usually phrased as "they continued on their way."

>“Well… eh… I… I can’t remember.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>But I am trailing off here.//

This usually means the speaker is gradually becoming quieter. What you want is closer to "but I digress" or "but I'm going on a tangent."

>Even though my eyes are but small and my sight is very ill//

Bats see about as well as people do.

>Hallo Giselda//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>terrible. Since the ride to that terrible//

Close word repetition.

>We should have turned around and go back//

gone

>“Is there a flying horse by the name of Fluttershy here?” The crow said//

Capitalization.

>he needn’t to//

That "to" is superfluous.

>—not the crow—,//

Don't use a comma in conjunction with a dash.

>“But we can’t do that!” The crow said//

Capitalization. There was an issue some time back where GDocs would automatically capitalize after dialogue if it ended in an exclamation mark or question mark. Maybe that's what's happening here.

I do wonder, when the crow said that it wouldn't be stealthy to have a whole swarm of birds accompanying them, that a bright yellow and pink flying horse isn't exactly going to blend in.

>If—“ he pointed his sword straight ahead at Fluttershy—“we//

Note the inconsistent dash placement. If they're both with the speech, it means the speaker stops while the inserted action occurs. If they're both with the narration, the speech doesn't stop. You have one of each. Also, that first set of quotation marks is backward.

>The feeling of losing someone you cared for, someone you loved. It was a feeling of a black torrent, snatching away your loved one and giving back nothing. Like a black arrow through your heart//

You're talking to the reader again.

>Ember grinded the mushrooms//

Ground. Just do a search for "grinded," as you use it more than once.

>and threw the powder//

Wait, how would he do that with fresh mushrooms? They'd have too much moisture in them to grind into a powder, unless someone had picked them and dried them first.

>count, As//

Extraneous capitalization.

>The chamber’s I’ve explored//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>gasses//

gases

>Tablet—”she filled it with new oil, relit it, and tossed it to Rainbow Dash, who caught the thing with her mouth; then she looked back—“so//

Inconsistent dash placement again.

>tell Ember all about her, leaving no detail untold//

Kind of repetitive word choice.

>several second of agony//

Typo.

>an applause//

"Applause" is a collective term. Don't use "an" with it. You do this multiple times.

>princess Celestia and princess Luna//

Capitalize the titles. And how did she get that magic from them? The discussion makes it sound like the princesses didn't know she took it.

>I’m sorry everypony.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>but Ember couldn’t care less//

You use that same phrase in consecutive sentences.

>Dash and Spike did more steps back//

Awkward phrasing.

>Indeed they weren’t. Starlight Glimmer and Twilight Sparkle were standing in a small crater//

This doesn't quite fit the perspective again. The narration in this scene so far is from Radagast's viewpoint, and the first sentence here very much sounds like his thoughts. But then it refers to two ponies by name, even though he hasn't learned their names yet.

>Twilight and Starlight knew the hidden figures were talking about them//

>They were talking about Fluttershy.//
Both of these are pretty self-explanatory. I don't think you need to say them. The reader will get the picture.

>They did another step closer.//

That must be a phrasing that doesn't translate well. It just sounds awkward in English.

>piano clavier//

I've heard of those separately as instruments, but never a single instrument referred to by both words at once.

>dash ,//

Extraneous space.

>But could Radagast’s reclaim her?//

Radagast's what?

>add to the stream she casted//

In this sense of the word, "cast" is the preferred past tense.

>And flying they did.//

The verb form for this phrasing would just be "fly."

>Twilight and Starlight exchanged a glance, as they knew very well what Radagast would do; they had read it in the book, after all. Still, they weren’t sure whether to tell that to Radagast. They were from another world, so interfering with Middle Earth might have big consequences on the fictional world Radagast lived in.//

Hm. This brings up something I'd like to discuss, but I'll save it for the end.

>friendship?” He asked.//

Capitalization.

>Discord did sentry-go//

I have no idea what this is.

>Everypony’s ears ringed.//

Rang.

Maybe I just missed it because I was skimming, but I don't recall ever seeing an explanation of why they excluded Discord from going through the portal. It sounded like they were going to explain it to him, but then Fluttershy calmed him down, and they never spoke up.

Well, I said I was going to wrap up some things at the end, so here goes. I really liked this story. I haven't read any Tolkein, so I don't know if this is supposed to mimic his style or just borrow from his world, but it's an effective tale either way. A lot of what I've noted here is detailed clean-up that's maybe a bit tedious to go through a story of this length (remember I only gave numerous comments on the first few chapters, so you should assume those things persist throughout), but not difficult to handle.

By the end, I came around to having Middle Earth be a fictional place even for Equestrians. It became a plot point that the ponies knew how things would go in the future, so having Middle Earth be an alternate dimension wouldn't have worked with that. So far, so good. But you kind of play both sides of whether they can use that knowledge. I don't understand why they can't alter what happens. Would it somehow change the actual book for them to do that? They refuse to warn Radagast about Sarumen, but they've already changed a fair amount of things just by their presence. So if they did intervene and help win this war before it starts, what implications would that have? It's not clear to me, and it seems like the rules governing that are a pretty important part of the world-building that's missing. The canon example of this is the Power Ponies comic, where they go in and just have a vague goal: defeat the enemy. If doesn't matter how, and then you get back out of the book. So why does this version of it need to work differently?

Next, the perspective is really jumpy. I'll grab this excerpt from chapter 19, which is a good example:

--------

“I know, Twilight. I feel terrible too,” Starlight said, while keeping an eye on the Wraiths, who seemed to be standing still now. “But we could at least—“

An explosion of sound interrupted Starlight’s words. In a chorus of unholy shrieks, the Ringwraiths unleashed their black breaths once more. They had heard them speak about flying, and realized that they might just flee. That couldn’t happen. They had to ground the ponies long enough to finish them off.

Behind the column, Radagast winced at the sound and the fear that bore it. Gritting his teeth, he tried his best to resist it, but found his mind too weak. Once again the agony tried to rip him apart. But then the black breath suddenly ended, and a grave silence lay upon Dol Guldur like a heavy blanket. Only the winds roared on.

--------

In the first paragraph, the "seemed" puts this in one of the good guys' perspectives. Really, it could be any of them who are paying attention, since any of them could have this opinion of the wraiths. If I go back a few paragraphs for context, it's most likely Twilight's perspective. But the point I want to make is that when you have the narrator expressing an opinion or personal impression, particularly if he does so in a conversational manner (emphasizing words, asking a question, using an exclamation mark, etc.), the narrator takes on that character's voice and essentially becomes that character. That's what a limited narration is. For omniscient, the opinion would need to be attributed to a character, like saying "seemed to Twilight" instead.

So we go to the second paragraph, and it's now delivering the wraiths' impressions. "That couldn't happen" is directly what the wraiths are thinking. No other character there would have this thought, and no other character there would be able to read their minds and know they were literally thinking this. They might deduce it, but it's stated as a fact.

And in the very next paragraph, we have Radagast taking the perspective. For example, the "he tried his best" and "found his mind too weak" are things only he would know. So in three consecutive paragraphs, you've inhabited three different perspectives. This is not a good thing to do.

There's a brief rationale in the section on "head hopping" at the top of this thread, but I'll sum it up a bit to say that you should try to hold to one perspective in a scene, if you can. When you shift to the wraiths and Radagast, like you have here, consider if it's really necessary. What do we learn from the wraiths' viewpoint? Nothing useful. We could already presume they would want the ponies fleeing, so learning they thought so doesn't change anything. And if it's not adding anything to be in their perspective, you shouldn't go there. Or if there is some critical piece of information, then it's worth staying in their perspective for a while. It's not even hard, most of the time, to show one character's emotions from another's perspective. You can tell when someone's happy from how the act, how they look, and what they say, after all. You don't have to read their mind to know. And that's why you don't usually have to shift perspective to get at information like that. When you keep jerking readers around to different viewpoints, it gets confusing, it's easy to mix up who thinks what, and it doesn't get the reader engaged on a deeper level with any of the characters.

The very unsteady perspective is the most pervasive problem I see, and it's really the only major one. If you could improve that substantially, I'd be happy to post the story, but I realize that it may be a daunting task to go back through 150k words with an eye to keeping the perspective more stable in each scene.

The last bit is that you disarm one of the story's major conflicts. When Radagast has to win Fluttershy's mind back to his side, he makes vague allusions to the torture and brainwashing she underwent, but that's one of the story's more powerful moments. It informs how hard it must be to get her back, that she was so thoroughly broken. Yet while the story does stay with her in places, it leaves her behind for this. It's not exactly that surprising what happens to her, since the Witch King had already alluded to such, so I don't see a reason to keep it secret.

In any case, the big emotional crux is knowing what happened to her so we know what it's going to take to undo it. But we never get to see that. There's just one paragraph of Radagast surmising what they did to her and sharing her memories of it, but it's told in very generic terms, and it's over with after a few sentences. It ends up not even being that difficult to win her back. It does take several paragraphs, but it's pretty steady progress with no setbacks, so it lacks some dramatic tension. I think it'd really add to the story's power if you added a couple scenes showing what happened to Fluttershy to get her to this state and struggle more to shake it off.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2959

>>2957
First off, not sure if you saw my earlier reply here:>>2939

>Re: Pound Cake and the honeycomb

They're a little distracting because there's no explanation for either. The reader's naturally going to assume thins are just like regular Equestria until it's explicitly said they aren't, so it's a natural question to ask where Pound Cake is when only Pumpkin was mentioned. Sure, the characters would have no clue who Pound Cake was either, so it wouldn't work to have them mention it. But just an offhand comment like calling Pumpkin their only child makes it explicitly clear. Same with the honeycomb. It's not that it's impossible for these characters, but a honeycomb isn't something you'd normally keep in a shed anyway, so it just confuses me as to why it's there.

>Re: Cup Cake's funeral

It's more that the chapter spends so much time with Apple Bloom, only to have her be pretty irrelevant to the story. You sure set her up like she's going to be a significant character, but nothing comes of it.

>Re: Dash

She knows that she used to be happy, but that she isn't anymore. She doesn't know why? Is it just a pervasive feeling that came over her gradually? If so, it might help to say that. The bigger issue is that she doesn't say how she knew she used to be happy. Give me a couple of quick one- or two-sentence anecdotes of happy memories. Be specific. The first time she medaled in a race and danced around so much she nearly fell off the podium. Little bits like that. They add so much life. And maybe she compares it to an anecdote more recently

>Re: Gimmick chapters

It would probably help if you do follow a pattern like you plan to, where you use witch perspectives but not familiar ones. Yet that may be a little too subtle for readers to pick up on. To wit, the characters don't identify which ones are run by familiars right off the bat, so the connecting thread doesn't become apparent until later. However, I talked about these scenes in my previous reply, so I won't repeat that here. The only thing I'd caution you about using the witches' perspectives is that you do need to let the witches come across as characters. Like don't just drop me into these perceptions without letting me get a hint of the witch's personality, same as you'd need to do with any character.

>Re: libretto

The biggest thing here is that most readers will be familiar with what a screenplay is, but have no idea what a libretto is. So just the fact that the dialogue is labeled by speaker feels like a script, and the reader will attach that to whatever's in their experience. Plus with MLP and Madoka being TV shows, it fits. That said, I don't think it matters, unless you're dead set on it coming across like an opera or musical. If that's the case, don't rely on the format alone. Add in imagery that would suggest one or the other, like a pit orchestra, audience using opera glasses, etc.

>Re: sestina

I'm not too familiar with many poetic forms, and most readers won't be either. I don't actually remember whether this was formatted in a way that made it look different from normal prose, so that's one potential fix. But repetition is a tricky thing to deal with. There are ways to make it obvious that it's intentional, and that's how you make it thematic. To do so would take acknowledging the repetition (like italicizing the second time for emphasis or using words such as "again" to call attention to it) or to use it more than twice in the same way, since that seems far more deliberate than two. And you did actually have it more than twice here, but it still didn't feel deliberate. That's an aesthetic thing, though, and the next reader could easily have a different reaction than I did. This one's a minor instance, and I don't think it'd hurt the story to have it. It's not like I won't approve your story if you don't fix every last thing. There's a tolerance level for artistic license.

Did you mean that the mention of stone served no purpose, or that having it as a sestina served no purpose? Because if it's the latter, then it may still lend to the labyrinth's atmosphere, and It's more so that what you say needs to have a purpose, not necessarily how you choose to say it. There are plenty of stories out there written as poems where there's no thematic reason for the story to be poetic. It can just be a genre choice, and I wouldn't say that's wrong.

I did say that some of the formatting choices were lost on me. That's more a data point for you. If many readers are getting lost, that's bad, but it might not bother others. You do have a reason for it. It's like if you told a joke that I didn't get. That doesn't automatically make it a bad joke, and most people might get it just fine. So if you say it's a sestina, I can accept that. It's just not the kind of thing most readers will notice or understand. You could explain it in an author's note for the chapter, if you wanted to make sure.

Jay Bear!cSWoEWwnvICountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2963

>>2959

Thanks, I did see >>2939. I wasn't sure what you meant that it wasn't possible to have scenes from the witch's perspective, which is why I tried it to see if I could find the problem myself. I see what you mean about building up their characterization, though, so I'll pay attention on that when editing those scenes.

>sestina

I meant having a sestina here doesn't serve a good purpose, and I do plan to replace it. Repeating "stone" (as well as light/dark, reflection, and book) were all products of the structure, so that will be less evident on the rewrite. It'll still be basically the same scene, but the style should make more sense. This was a case where I wasn't really thinking about the style's effect on how this part of the story is told, and I think the story does suffer here. If I got really lucky, someone who knows about sestinas might recognize it and comments "Cool, it's a sestina," and other people would know that was intentional rather than me getting sloppy with repetition and line breaks. It's not worth it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2964

>>2963
Yeah, it'd just be weird to show the labyrinth scenes through the witches' eyes in a very mechanical sense without having any of their characterization come through. Perspective is supposed to get the reader to identify with or understand a character, and if you never do anything with them except literally describe what they see, then it's kind of pointless. That said, I could buy it as building atmosphere, but without letting the reader see a little about who these witches are, it'd feel exceedingly superficial, which is against the point of using a limited narrator.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2965

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I'm going to do something to illustrate a point. Here are the first words of all your narrative sentences for the first scene:
a, the, the, I, I, pneumatic, the, the, an, a, a, the, she, I, I, below, a, a, I, a, I, Zephyr, I, she, I
Except for that one "below," you have very repetitive sentence beginnings. Now, some words like "a" and "the" are so mundane that they pass by without notice, so it's not so much that the words themselves are repetitive; it's more that the sentence structures are. They all start with the subject. It gets to feel like a list of actions and doesn't flow very well.

>I swallowed and met her eyes. “Which means… we have to land.” Zephyr nodded. “Crap.”//

It's a little ambiguous who says this dialogue.

>left, a broad river valley at the north end, and an immense forest along the left//

It's a little odd that you're mixing types of directions.

You're probably giving more of a description of the map than you need. How many of these details are actually going to be important to the story? If a lot of them, then how many will be important soon? It's better to introduce information as it's needed instead of pushing a bunch of it at once and hoping the reader will remember it later.

>aluminum eggshell//

For one, you called it aluminum and polycarbonate before, and for another, you don't need to remind the reader so soon afterward what the aircraft is made of.

>week,Zephyr//

Needs a space.

>again.” Zephyr grabbed my seat and lifted her helmet as the transport rocked again//

Watch close repetition of words like that.

>The pegasus//

He knows her well. Why would he refer to her in such an impersonal manner? You don't think of your coworker as "the person," do you?

>the heavily armored mare//

Another very impersonal reference for a friend. I assume this kind of thing will pervade the story, so I won't mark anymore, but this i why this kind ofdescriptor doesn't work with a limited or first-person narrator. People think about other they know in three ways: name, pronoun, and relationship. Only the third falls into the realm of this kind of descriptor, so he might call her "my teammate" or something.

>thick, nylon//

>small, quartz//
These are hierarchical adjectives, so you don't need a comma between them. It can be tricky in some cases to tell the difference, but the general way is that if they describe different aspects or would sound really awkward in reverse order, you don't need a comma. There are a whole lot more of these I saw, but I'm not going to keep marking them.

>“Yeah,” I hollered toward the airlock, “Just//

The way you use those commas, it means both parts of the quote form one continuous sentence, but if that's the case, you've capitalized "just" in the middle of a sentence.

>quartz porthole//

I wonder why they're using quartz anyway. If they have the technology to make polycarbonate, then they must have something better than glass for the windows. It's heavy and not very resistant to damage.

>popped open and swung open//

Kind of repetitive language.

>A high, keening hiss made the aircraft’s hull ring. Lightning crackled along the hull breach, and a glowing, serpentine form shot into the cabin.//

This is another thing the chapter suffers from. I feel like I've seen these same actions and description three or four times already. There's lightning, noise from the hull, damage to it, loud sounds, lots of quartz, cannons firing, over and over again.

>razer teeth//

razor

>farther than it had right//

I've only ever seen that phrased as "than it had any right to."

Here's another thing: if you'd used a third-person limited narrator, there's a range of distances you can use. But when you choose first-person, you're irrevocably at a very close distance to the character. That means that the narration should sound like the character might speak, reflecting his intelligence level, vocabulary, personality and mannerisms. And it should also reflect what's happening at the moment. While the aircraft is breaking up, look at how calmly and stoically he describes it all. If that were you, wouldn't you be freaking out? I'd expect this section to be fast-paced, lacking in detail aside from what he'd focus on for his survival (to make an example, in the middle of a swordfight, it wouldn't make sense for him to give a lengthy description of the mountains in the background), and expressive of his emotions.

>As the serpent shook its entire body and retreated half a meter, maw gaping wide in a hiss, a thin, metal object fell from a holster taped to the pod’s roof and clattered on my ice-encased legs. Frost encroached on my eyelids, numbing my face and locking my mouth open. I began to jerk and buck inside the ice as the ice grew over my nostrils and cracked lips. The serpent shrieked a final time as I wrapped a shaky field around the shotgun on my lap and raised it to eye level.//

Around here, your sentence structure is getting repetitive again, but in a different way. Look how many "as" clauses you're using in this paragraph and the ones around it. Authors of intermediate experience often lean way too heavily on participial phrases and "as" clauses, but they get repetitive easily, since they don't appear much in everyday conversation, so they stand out. Do a Ctrl-f on " as " (include the spaces before and after) and watch the screen light up. There are 128 in the chapter. Granted, you use the word in similes, too, and those will happen in pairs, but that's still a lot. And that won't pick up ones at the beginnings of sentences either.

>As I watched, a tattered, scorched book and several burning pages blew out into the grey skies on the whistling, uncaring wind.//

The thing is, as a reader, I have no idea what this book is yet. I haven't even seen him act like it was particularly important, So it means nothing to me when it's lost. Now he's acting like he's upset, but I'm very detached from it since I don't understand why. He just gets the default sympathy he would for any generic character who's lost something.

>despite the hot air//

It's still going to feel cold at that speed.

>The first of many raindrops speckled the concrete and steel around us.//

Wait, I thought you said this was in a desert. For that matter, what's a bed factory doing in the desert? It'd be expensive to supply it with resources.

>Cold water splashed across my face.//

He was just about to set up camp, and this scene seems totally disconnected from that. I have no idea what's going on here. Maybe he's disoriented, too, but there's no indication of it, so my only assumption can be that he knows exactly what's going on. So why don't I?

>Ma’am; you require medical attention.//

Why the semicolon? It's not used right. A comma would be fine there.

>one hundred and fifty-seven//

I'd think a robot would be programmed to know it's improper to use "and" in a number like that.

>glided inside the immense, domed room. Other robots like the one that carried me glided//

More close word repetition.

>Another robot glided to the bed//

And shortly after, more gliding.

You're losing the sense of a limited narration again. While Crystal is in this operating room, you just go to all the voices and dialogue around her. It's first-person, though. I'm supposed to be getting her experience of all this. There are confusing and strange things going on, and they're talking about amputation. Why doesn't she have any reaction to it? It's like she's completely indifferent to all this.

>I reared up as it leapt, rammed my forehooves into its chest//

This makes it sound like the ghoul rammed his forehooves into its chest.

>Rasping, bestial growls that sent shivers down my spine//

I'm barely a page into the chapter, and this is already the third shiver to go down his spine.

By this point, I just see more of the same. I'll skim the rest of what's published to see if there are any big plot problems, but really the only thing I haven't mentioned yet is this is pushing the limits on gore. There's some pretty explicit descriptions. I'll still note detailed things I see, but I'll be reading too fast to catch much.

>It’s the nearest river for thousands of square kilometers//

Why is he stating distance using an area measurement?

>sky; approaching from a few kilometers away was a trio of dark specks that stood out against the blue sky//

More close word repetition.

>it’sq//

Typo.

>To the right of my saddlebags were the husk of my armor//

Number disagreement. the subject of "were" is "husk."

>Faint buzzes almost outside my range of hearing came from the limb.

>
>A faint//
Close word repetition.

>darlin.’//

The apostrophe would go before the period. It doesn't work like quotation marks.

>times—” I jerked my head to the right. “—but//

Don't use a period on an aside like this. The only end punctuation they take is a question mark or exclamation mark, as appropriate.

>I levitated small plate//

Missing word.

>diner: One//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>yeah…” I trailed off//

The ellipsis already means she trailed off. Saying so in the narration as well is redundant.

Okay, I'm at the end of chapter 2. A lot of words in, and a lot of words still to go, but I'm not seeing any new problems I hadn't already seen in chapter 1. I could go on, but there's not a lot of point to it, as all I'd really get out of it is making sure there weren't any big plot holes (and since the story is incomplete, I couldn't guarantee there never would be anyway) and seeing if you cross the line on any of our content restrictions. So I'm going to stop here.

Really, anything I've had to mention multiple times are the things that need attention, but I'll sum them up here.

-You constantly put commas between adjectives that shouldn't have them.
-You have very repetitive sentence structures, where the vast majority start with the subject. Try reading your story out loud, especially if you skip the dialogue, and I think you'll hear how plodding it feels. You also have spots where you use a ton of "as" clauses.
-This is probably pushing it as to what gore we can allow.
-The narration is very bland and emotionless for a first-person narrator. The whole point of first-person is to give me a front-row seat to the character's thoughts and impressions. It'll typically read like an internal monologue or stream of consciousness. Compare your narration to your main character's dialogue. Her speech is very animated and indicative of how she feels. So are the few thoughts that are presented as quotes. The narration shouldn't sound much different than that, but it very much does.

The repetition and the emotionless narration are the two biggest issues, and unfortunately, they're also some of the more involved things for an author to deal with. It's not going to be a quick process to go through 100k+ words and revamp that. If you can, then I'd be happy to look at it again. I have almost no familiarity with Fallout, either the game or the MLP crossover, so I don't know how much of this story is original and how much is borrowed. I at least recognize a couple character names, but for instance, I don't know whether Eagle, Zephyr, and these alicorns are your invention or not. Either way, they're interesting characters, and on the whole, the writing is good. I think you're capable, but it's also a lot of work to fix those things.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 2980

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>his teeth shined//

"Shined" is a transitive past tense, so this would need a direct object, and it would say that his teeth were polishing something. You need "shone."

>Nodding at his reflection, he trotted across his room in Princess Twilight’s castle and out the door, stopping once to pick up a single purple rose with no thorns from his desk.//

Note that participial phrases mean things happen at the same time, so he nods at the mirror, trots across the room, and stops simultaneously. It's more reasonable that those things would happen in sequence.

>especially after what happened a month ago with Duke Bull Horn//

It's a bit off-putting to make such a big deal of this without explaining any of it. I'll come back to this in a moment.

>She wore an elegant purple dress that to flow with every move.//

Wording is off.

>What had come to a shock to Flash//

I've always heard that phrased as "come as a shock."

>it actually didn't turn out to be to difficult//

To/too confusion.

>more than one…awkward conversations, to say the least.//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, and you have a singular/plural mismatch.

The flashback scene is presumably the background about the duke we're supposed to get, but it starts out with a huge block of exposition, which isn't a good way to get the reader's interest. It runs for 11 paragraphs. It's better to work that kind of thing in gradually as it becomes important.

>slid it her head and the map//

Missing word.

>thinks your crazy//

Your/you're confusion.

>Smarty pants//

That's a name, so both words would be capitalized.

>incidents,” Spike said, wincing, “But//

The way you punctuated that, the quote is on continuous sentence, so when you capitalize "but," you're doing it in the middle of a sentence.

>Twilight and Flash’s//

By not putting a possessive on Twilight, this means their heads are community property that they own jointly.

>It’s be enough//

Typo.

>The duke//

You're inconsistent at capitalizing that.

>more then just a guard//

Than/then confusion.

>and the idea of stressing her out by having her worry about a relationship with him was the last thing he wanted//

How is that more stressful than a relationship with anyone else? Or does he think she shouldn't be in one at all?

>Worse-case//

Worst-case

>worse comes to worse//

"Worst" on both of those, too.

>O-Ok//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>I need to pick up a book I lent her anyway.//

Wouldn't she be interested to go anyway? You don't have to make up a contrived reason for her to go.

>giggling at the drake’s enthusiasm//

You're using a limited narrator in Flash's perspective, so the narration is essentially his thoughts. Why would he internally refer to Spike with something as impersonal as "the drake" when he knows Spike well?

>The present…//

If you do flashbacks well, you won't have to indicate when they happen. The info will be in the context. But why did you use a line to separate scenes here when you didn't at the previous scene break?

>so twinkly that could blend in with Twilight’s castle//

Missing word.

>‘nobles’” she said//

Missing a comma.

>make-shift//

makeshift

>he was being to forward//

Too/to confusion.

>a pony well dressed pony//

Extraneous word, well-dressed.

>I though with a title//

Typo.

>in a horrible, horrible impression of…it was so bad, Twilight couldn’t even figure out what accent he was trying to imitate//

Why are you jumping over to Twilight's perspective here?

>Doth mother know…you wearth her drapes?//

"Mother" would be capitalized in this instance, and he's got the archaic verb conjugation wrong. I can't tell if he's doing it on purpose or if it's your mistake.

>And with that//

You start two paragraphs fairly close together with that identical phrase.

>flower pots//

flowerpots

>The center of the ballroom had been cleared for dancing and a stage set up right next to it, but there were a number of small tables off to one side and a stage for the band off to the other.//

So... there are two stages? I'm confused.

>ruining you date//

Typo.

>Faust have mercy on me//

That's very cliched.

>And with that//

You really like that phrase.

>Their not here yet.//

Their/they're confusion.

>working it’s way//

Its/it's confusion.

>pegesi//

Typo, but why do you have it as plural anyway? You have the other two types as singular.

>Pretty sure we’re all foals compared Celestia.//

Missing word.

>Twilight asked in shock.//

You identify shock fairly often, too. Even so, it's better to make her look shocked than to tell me she is. How does she act? What does she look like?

>Money Bag’s//

This implies his name is Money Bag.

>wont //

Typo.

>All three ponies turned as Princess Celestia herself made her way towards the group, everypony else bowing as she passed. Flash himself also bowed as she approached, partly out of duty, and partly out of reverence.//

That's three "as" clauses in only two sentences. It's a bad idea to be structurally repetitive like this.

>Money bags//

Capitalization.

I'm a bit past the halfway point, and I'm getting bogged down in all these detailed mechanical things, a lot of them the same issues over and over again. Just assume you need to sweep the whole story for them. I'm going to read the rest just to look for plot or character problems.

Wait, the duke is actually going to try assassinating Twilight? That's pretty extreme.

This isn't a bad story, but it's pretty cliched for the point to be getting them up to a first date, a kiss, a wedding, or whatever. Twilight does learn that others can appreciate her for who she is, but even that's a fairly cliched lesson on its own. Plus the conflict that leads up to it, the dispute with Bull Horn, is very superficial. He just comes across as a generic villain, not someone with a real personality. If he just feels like a stock baddie, then it'll disarm the story's tension. It'd help if you gave him a more legitimate beef with her or at least gave him an emotional arc.

Aside from that, there were plenty of editing issues, and for a story with a limited narrator, the narration itself doesn't feel very lively. Unless you have the perspective character's impressions flowing in pretty regularly, it can revert to feeling omniscient. In places, you do that well. It's not just what the narration says, but how it says it. If Flash is angry, for instance, let the narration sound like an angry person.

The flashback sequence ended up being awkwardly wedged in. I think you'd do much better to keep things in chronological order and put that first. The structure implied you'd be skipping back and forth in time, but you only ever did it once.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3001

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>of...well//

Leave a space after an ellipsis, unless there;s more punctuation after it or it starts the sentence.

>O-Okay//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

I have to agree with the comment that there's an awful lot of italics here. When you emphasize nearly everything, you effectively emphasize nothing.

>It had only been...a week?//

Space needed after the ellipsis again. I won't keep marking this, but I pulled it out for another reason. This paragraph brings the story's momentum to a halt. It has 8 "to be" verbs. That's a very boring verb, as nothing happens. You should use active verbs wherever you can, since the engage the reader more. Just as an example, say you rephrased this sentence as "How much time had gone by... a week?" That's all active phrasing, and it doesn't lose any of its meaning. It's impractical to remove all "to be" verbs, but it makes for a more active story when you only use them sparingly.

>The pony straightened up and brushed her long green mane out of her face, revealing bright orange eyes. “Oh, hey! Didn’t see you there. I’m Spring Forward!”//

But Spring Forward has a pale pinkish coat, blonde hair, and green eyes: http://mlp.wikia.com/wiki/Spring_Forward

>except for the wing//

And Spring Forward is an earth pony

Why is Spring Forward so chipper? Most prisoners aren't.

>It was full of surprising bitterness from the still somehow cheerful in the face of being captured, beat up, and shoved into a dingy prison, with meat, the Other, and...herself.//

I can't quite decipher that sentence. It feels like there's supposed to be some mention of Spring later on. Like, what does "cheerful" describe?

>Tempest raised her head in a sudden movement, surprised, then took a second look at Spring’s wing.//

You just mentioned surprise a sentence ago. But also beware of directly identifying emotions like this. It's too calmly self-aware for her to realize that, and with the type of narrator you're using, Tempest is effectively the narrator. If you're surprised, do you calmly think to yourself, "I'm surprised," or do you think, "oh crap!"

I don't get what the griffons want to achieve by leaving a dead body in the cell, especially since they go down there. Someone had to put Spring in there, after all. It'd stink, even to them. Maybe they just want to traumatize the prisoners? There's been no explanation as to why, though. Tempest hasn't described anything as outright abusive.

>Pegasi relied on their wings to do their magic.//

Wait, pegasi can start fires with their wings?

>backed away, eyes darting back//

Watch the repetitive word choice.

>escaped!//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics. You have other instances of this.

>It was a miserable five days//

And we don't know how long Tempest has been there. So is she actually eating the meat? Because I don't see how she's alive otherwise. I also can't believe the griffons are stupid enough not to know they can't feed ponies that, unless it's another form of torture. Then that goes back to my earlier point about there being no clear evidence of torture, which would be counterproductive to selling them as slaves anyway.

>some labeled with simple words like Corn//

Now I'm confused. Meat would be more expensive than corn. Why feed prisoners meat when they can feed them cheaper corn, which they'll actually eat? And a healthy slave is a better slave.

>down. A griffon led the way, carefully lowering herself down//

Repeated use of "down," plus the second one's redundant with "lowering" anyway.

So does Spring Forward's body in the cell imply that The Other was someone else whose death Tempest had been responsible for?

>“Interesting…” he snapped his fingers.//

You have that lower-case as if it's a speech tag, but there's no speaking verb.

Either the ending is really weak or it's just going way over my head. I guess the Storm King figured out Tempest had been responsible for bringing down the ship, so he respects her power. But what is it that she thinks she can benefit from by talking to him? She'd still be in a situation where she felt she was better off alone. That's what made her run away from home in the first place. Also, this isn't exactly how they met. Now, we're not typically in the habit of enforcing comic canon, since they don't take care to mesh with the show, even sometimes contradicting it. But there were 4 comics made specifically as prequels to the movie, and the 4th deals with how Tempest came to work for the Storm King. I don't think it'd take much of a tweak to get in compliance with that, but I'm also not going to require you to.

I also agree with one of the comments that Spring's death has an understated enough effect on Tempest that it's a little hard to get as much of an emotional impact from it. Part of it is that the reader will have a default reaction, just because the death is a sad situation, but the other part is seeing how Tempest responds to it. Again, this is something a minor tweak would handle. Some kind of rage when she burns down the ship would help, and I see that she does express anger toward herself, but she never comes across as the Stockholm Syndrome type where she wouldn't also blame the griffons. Maybe she deserves the pain, but they do, too.

There are a few things here that don't quite jive, plus the mechanical fixes. If you can tend to that, I'd be happy to post the story. When you're ready to resubmit, I wouldn't need a full reread, so you can mark it as "back from Mars."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3002

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>enjoying the warmth of the sun and the fresh air//

It's ambiguous whether this refers to Twilight or Spike.

>She stopped in place and looked at the sky over the Everfree Forest.

>
>“Hey, Twilight! What are you looking at?” Spike looked//
That's 3 uses of "look" in a close space. It's a word many authors tend to overuse.

>A pleasant and relaxing picnic with her friend was exactly what she needed to forget about the recent fiasco with the publishing of the Friendship Journal.//

Let me back up to this sentence. This is clearly Twilight's internal thought expressed as narration. That makes this a limited narrator in her perspective. It's a bad idea to let this kind of perspective wander around. Yet only three paragraphs into the story, it's already switched:
>It took very little effort for Spike to identify what held Twilight Sparkle's attention, because there was a large, shimmering patch of air above the Everfree Forest, as colorful and shifting as Celestia's mane in a stiff breeze. He had to admit, he had never before witnessed something as unique and flickering as the light in the sky, which swiftly started shrinking in on itself. Well… maybe that one time at the Crystal Empire when the Crystal Heart was activated against King Sombra...//
This is very much in Spike's perspective, and it takes a conversational tone. If you want the story told through his eyes, why start with Twilight at all? I suspect you're going to have lots of problems with jumpy perspective.

>Trying to make some sense of her situation//

Don't over-explain things like this. Let her actions speak for themselves.

>Her neck was a little stiff, but flexible enough to look over her shoulder and down, noticing the two bronze stripes of fur running along her spine.//

This explicitly says her neck noticed the stripes.

>the bruised that were starting to color her skin//

Typo.

>dangerous predators who would love to feast on her bruises body//

Opposite typo.

>Yet, something felt odd.//

It's rarely needed to put a comma after a conjunction.

>She couldn’t help herself from occasionally glance at the scary looking trees//

Typo.

>a mistake resulting in her little nose being pricked by a thorn.//

This is a subtle thing, but you often have very subdued reactions. Take when Raichu first woke up. She has no idea where she is, and nothing looks even remotely familiar. Yet the narration sounds very calm. Same here. We're calmly told she pricked herself on a thorn. What would actually go through your mind if this happened to you? This stoic mention of it doesn't sound like she's surprised at all, and then she goes on to rub it without remarking on how it feels. Wouldn't that be on her mind at the moment?

>a sight of a blueberry caught her attention//

This says the sight of the blueberry caught her attention, not that to blueberry did. Seems odd.

>T-that//

Consider what sound is actually repeated. "That" doesn't start with a "t" sound.

>wooden jaws//

You already said they were made out of wood.

>rolling on the ground//

As it's placed in the sentence, this tends to describe the roar, not Raichu.

>After looking up, the pupils in her eyes//

This says her pupils looked up, which while true, is a strange way to phrase things.

>back first//

The way you're using it, hyphenate that phrase.

>“I hope no animal got hurt," she murmured, torn between the safety of her home and the possibility that some poor, helpless creature in the dark forest was injured and needed her help.//

See, this is what I was talking about when I said you tend to over-explain things. The narration expresses the exact same thing she just got finished saying. The reader already knows she feels this way.

>noticing a small dust cloud moving across the numerous hills//

You began the scene in Fluttershy's perspective. Twilight wasn't even there yet. But how would Fluttershy know what Twilight noticed? There might be context clues she reads, but you're stating it as fact, so it amounts to a perspective shift.

>hoping that no Equestria-ending threat awaited them//

And just as quickly, you're back to Fluttershy's perspective.

>sliding down hills//

>slid down her forehead//
Repetitive word choice in consecutive sentences.

>escaping death was the only thing on her mind//

If this is so, how can the narration even talk about anything else? Such is the difficulty of using a limited narrator: the narrator can't know anything the character doesn't. So if you're explicitly saying Raichu can't think about anything but escaping, then that's all the narrator can talk about.

>She looked up, a lifetime supply of apples hung there//

Comma splice.

>a distinct impression of her body, all the way up to the ears//

This is almost exactly the way you described the crater in the prologue.

>of relief//

>expression of anticipatory terror//
Try to avoid directly identifying emotion like this, particularly using a with/in/of phrasing. It doesn't paint much of a visual. What does she do? What does she look like? That's more engaging to describe.

>Not even feeling all that tired despite her non-stop running.//

That sentence fragment feels out of place.

I don't understand the purpose of the short scene with Applejack in it. Presumably she's going to catch up to Raichu at some point, and we can find out what's been going on with her then. Nothing of consequence happens in this scene. Same with Apple Bloom's scene.

>Ya’re//

What's this?

>Even in Equestria, a flying wingless critter wasn’t something she would ignore or consider normal. It wasn’t flying for long though.//

Why would the "even in Equestria" occur to her? When has she ever been anywhere else?

>Ah’em//

And what's this?

>showing four tiny fangs in her shining teeth//

She can't see this? How does she know what it looks like?

>ya'//

What's the apostrophe for? What letters are missing?

>“Ah said, drop that apple before Ah make ya!” Applejack said with firm steps and narrowed eyes.//

That's Raichu narrating this. How does she know Applejack's name?

You're really overwriting the Apples' accent. Readers know what they sound like.

>still apologizing//

In the way you're using this, it needs a hyphen.

><N-no thanks,>//

I don't see a reason to use implied speech here. Applejack can infer well enough what Raichu means without having to spell it out as dialogue. If Fluttershy were here, it might be a different matter.

>kept shaking its head//

>Applejack kept watching//
Repetitive use of "kept" in consecutive sentences.

At least the events in this scene are important, but it shouldn't be necessary to switch to Applejack's perspective for it. We don't really learn anything that we couldn't from Raichu's viewpoint. She's who the story's really about, after all. She can read all this info about how Applejack feels by observing what she does.

>Raichu kept staring at the apple, occasionally glancing between the mare and filly who kept encouraging her//

More repetitive use of "kept."

>ya’re//

I've never seen this before. What exactly is it a contraction of?

>the pokemon’s head//

You're in Raichu's viewpoint. Why would she refer to herself like this? In your own thoughts, do you call yourself "the person"?

>Raichu’s eyes opened in an instant. “I do what?”//

I sure got the sense from the prologue that she already knew she talked like that. She's repeatedly said it out loud, while the narration is in her perspective, so she must be aware of it.

>taking a moment to fix her purple mane//

Why wold Starlight bother mentioning her own hair color? It's not relevant, and it'd be something she takes for granted.

><Hello,> she said as the word “Rai” reached ponies’ ears.//

You've been using Starlight's perspective in the scene, so this would be her knowledge. How did she understand that as a hello?

>taking a moment to fix her purple mane//

>walking by numerous pillars and doors//
>waiting for Applejack to approach//
>stopping herself in the middle of the stairs//
>riding the farm mare’s back//
>noticing a few bandages on the critter’s head//
That's all in just the first screen of chapter 2. You're using so many participial phrases that it gets structurally repetitive. And go back to that "riding the farm mare's back." Normally, you'd see an "on" in there. Plus Starlight knows Applejack. Why would she refer to her with something as impersonal as "the farm mare"?

><No, I would never!>//

Again, how would Starlight know this? The narrator essentially is Starlight at this point, so if she doesn't know something, the narrator can't either.

>words made of is their own name//

Phrasing is off. And has it been established yet that her name is Raichu? It wouldn't be hard for her to confirm that, but just make sure it actually happens somewhere.

>Why are you calling her pest?//

Missing word.

>still slightly sad//

I can't tell what perspective you're in anymore. Starlight's? Raichu's? It keeps jumping around. Pick one and stick with her for the scene.

>few months worth//

That's phrased as a possessive: few months' worth.

>“I must say, never in my life have I encountered or read about such an animal,” Dr. Fauna said, clapping her forehooves in excitement.//

I'm not sure it buys you anything to do this scene as a flashback. Why not just move it to the beginning of the chapter so it's all in chronological order?

>The rat could do little but stare at those impressive features of Raichu.//

Why are you jumping to the rat's viewpoint now? And "impressive features of Raichu" is such a roundabout way of saying that. Why not just "Raichu's impressive features"?

>cool looking//

Hyphenate.

>60%//

>22//
Write out the words.

>lollypop//

lollipop

>This taste delicious//

Typo.

>wood-fragments//

You don't need a hyphen there.

>‘Arts of mind healing and hypnosis’//

You only need the italics, not the quotes, but do capitalize the title properly.

>while-yellow//

Not sure what that was supposed to be.

>down with a bit more rubble falling onto the floor. She approached her, looked down//

Close repetition of "down."

>‘bout//

Note that smart quotes get leading apostrophes backward because they assume you want an opening single quote. You can paste one in the right way.

>Starlight grit her teeth//

Past tense is "gritted."

>Raichu fell to her knees and grit her teeth//

Same thing, but it's repetitive to have Raichu do the same thing as Starlight just a paragraph later.

>luckily none was reaching any precious books//

The comma before this is a splice, and the syntax is off here. So is the perspective. Who's the one saying the books are precious? I can't tell.

>her hoof leaving a hoof-mark//

That would seem to be self-evident.

>She levitated Raichu upward and placed on her own back//

Missing word.

>Not only it gave her time//

Phrasing is off.

>Applejack held hat//

>bringing back smile//
Missing word.

>This place have//

Typo.

>Small snowdrops were falling from the sky while one landed on her nose and dissolved into water.//

Melting isn't the same thing as dissolving.

>First one being the fact//

>Most of them being//
>the fact that she was one of them//
That's a lot of repetitive language for one paragraph.

>M-mon....//

You only need three dots, and is Raichu Jamaican now?

>words; ‘Pikachu’ and ‘their child’.//

You're clarifying there, so use a colon, not a semicolon.

>wrapped in bandage//

"wrapped in bandages" or "wrapped in a bandage"

>She grit her teeth//

gritted

>Why’s she so different now//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>She was lying on a spacious wooden bed with violet eiderdown and a large blue pillow, her size was certainly no match for the owner of this bed.//

Comma splice.

>One quick glance at the window at the brown sky//

Surely you meant that first "at" to be "out."

>overtime//

This needs to be two words.

Why is the letter in the same format as Raichu's translated speech?

>Awkward silence overtook the room as Starlight and Raichu stared at each other, none dared to move.//

>Raichu climbed down and peeked from behind the bed, only the upper part of her head was visible thanks to her cover.//
Comma splices.

>calming her nerves//

How does Raichu know that's what she's doing?

>hiding animal and added, “You can come out from hiding//

Close repetition.

>She pointed at her mentor.//

How does Raichu know what relationship they have?

>suddenly feeling uneasy//

And this isn't in Raichu's perspective either. Your viewpoint is jumping around.

>The comfort of the bed beating dirt in a scary forest any day.//

That's awkwardly phrased.

>the reason behind bandages//

Missing word.

There's nothing I need to go into detail about in summary here. The three biggest issues were general editing, unsteady perspective, and repetition.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3007

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Short description:
>own, little//
No reason to have a comma there.

Long description:
>The day goes on and Spike and Sweetie Belle babysit Flurry Heart together, almost like their own little family.//
That's actually the same sentence you have in the short description, but you have different comma usage in each. The one you have after "on" in the short description should be in this one, too.

Story:
>They should be arriving here at any moment, now//
This isn't really a situation to use a comma there. You would if you wanted to emphasize "now," like she's just gotten new information that changes things. The "any moment now" idiom doesn't use one.

>Now Spike//

And it's kind of repetitive to use "now" so soon after. Especially right at the beginning, you don't want to create the impression that the story is likely to be repetitive.

>"Ugh," Spike rolled his eyes.//

You've punctuated that as if it's a speech attribution, but it has no speaking verb. You can't just tack any action on to dialogue with a comma.

>For the thousandth time Twilight//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I've got this," He chuckled.//

Same deal with a non-speaking action. Even if this were acceptable to do, you wouldn't capitalize the speech tag.

>I promise," Spike came to a stop.//

Let's just say non-speaking speech tags are going to be a pervasive issue, as will likely capitalization of speech tags. You'll need to sweep the story for these. There's a brief guide to it at the top of this thread.

>She padded his head.//

You've confused "padded" for "patted." And at this point, I wouldn't assume the reader has retained anything from the description or cover art. It's worth establishing right away that Spike is older and bigger than he is in the show.

>The others should be waiting for us at the train station, already.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>the way the there//

Extraneous word.

>As Twilight was chasing niece//

Missing word.

Actually, is Spike any older? If not, the cover art is misleading. Flurry Heart doesn't seem to be any older.

>he knew being Shining Armor's brother would naturally make Twilight Flurry Heart's aunt//

Twilight is his sister.

>Seeee?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include a question mark or exclamation mark on it in the italics. There are other instances of this later on.

>just absolutely filled with toys and games that were just//

Watch the close word repetition. In particular, this is a word inexperienced authors tend to overuse.

>fluttered her way out of Spike's arms before jetting her way//

More repetitive phrasing.

>She nuzzled her head.//

The direct object of "nuzzle" should be what she's doing it to, not with.

>down the hallways at high seed//

Typo.

>just adorable playing with the all the toys. There was just//

Close usage of that word again.

>*Gasp!*//

Watch that you don't let personal opinions creep into the narration. So far, you've been using an omniscient narrator, so in this paragraph, it's fine when you say Flurry felt sympathy, because that's factual. But when you take a conversational tone like this, it pushes it into a limited narrator, and then stating something only Flurry Heart could know means you're shifting perspective, which isn't a good idea in the middle of a scene.

>Uuhh.........//

Three dots is plenty.

>Flurry soared him//

"Soar" doesn't take a direct object.

>lest he would risk//

"Lest" uses a different kind of verb form called subjunctive mood. The bottom line is that you don't need "would" here.

>That made very Flurry happy.//

Jumbled wording.

>*puff.*//

You don't need to put asterisks around sound effects like this.

>He lied there on the bear for a moment//

They're tricky verbs to keep straight, but you should use "lay" here instead of "lied."

>this-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs and asides.

>I..?//

Needs one more dot in the ellipsis.

>cutiemark//

That's two words.

>Spike walked stepped//

Extraneous word.

>beside castle’s the doors//

Jumbled wording.

>Many Ponyville's ponies//

Missing word.

>Not ones to deny such a day, Spike//

You're referring to Spike with the plural "ones."

>a plane double hayburger//

You've confused "plane" with "plain."

>Eh, don't worry about//

Don't worry about what?

>street's//

That should be a plural, not a possessive.

>He's the fella you're dancing with in that cute, little wedding picture you keep in your room.//

I'm nearly halfway through the story, and this is the first bit of tension that's come up. Until now, it's just been fluff. There's no source of conflict, no character growth. Any sort of problem that arises is immediately dealt with. You need to have something pushing the story forward.

>broke a tear//

That's not a phrasing I've ever heard before, but if it's familiar to you, it's fine.

>Around a lot of carrot dogs and hayburgers, I'm willing to bet.//

I assume it's Cookie thinking this? If you're going to use an omniscient narrator, you'll normally want to put dialogue-type tags on thoughts.

>Ma'am/

That's a generic title, same as the "sir" Spike used earlier. You wouldn't capitalize this.

>I appreciate it, Sir//

Well, now you've decided to capitalize it. It shouldn't be.

>is she more of trouble//

Phrasing is off.

>still napping//

Hyphenate, given the way you've used it.

>Why did Hondo have to say what he said?//

Why is Sweetie Belle referring to her dad by his name?

>Spike awkwardly rubbed the back of his.//

The back of his what?

>A small blushed//

Typo.

>Y-You//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>'come with me, dear,'.//

Capitalization, extraneous comma.

>But........//

Three dots is plenty.

>she is...embracing it? What is going on?//

Why'd you switch to present tense in the narration?

>"She's gone!"//

I'm about 75% of the way through the story, and this is the first whiff of real conflict. That's a lot to ask of a reader to stick it out this long.

>Despite Spike having scales, Flurry very comfortable in his arms.//

Some missing words in there.

>You've been real good to her, today.//

You really like to stick commas on those adverbs at the ends of sentences. They're rarely needed.

>Sweetie Belle green eyes//

Missing a possessive.

>hangout//

As one word, that's a noun. You need it to be a verb.

>look before looking//

Repetitive word use.

>You won't find stain//

Missing word.

>"..."//

That may cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing.

>........Wow//

Three dots is plenty.

These are just examples of the editing issues I found. There are more, but I should have all the types covered. Other than the editing, the perspective is very unsteady. It never settles into either omniscient or limited narration, and while limited, it skips around to different characters frequently. And there's never tha much of a conflict or character growth. There are minor ones like what to feed Flurry Heart and when she goes missing, but they're all solved quickly and with little effort. The only thing we learn about the characters is that Spike and Sweetie Belle may have a mutual crush, but that doesn't get developed through the course of the story. It's way into inconsequential slice of life material before it's even brought up, and then nothing is done with it by the end of the story. They still just may have a mutual crush.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3011

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>There's still a lot a fighting//

That second "a" should be "of." Maybe you were going for a more phonetic interpretation of how she said it? Either way, the computer still has to hear her and decide what words to use, and even our modern ones are decent at catching grammar like that. I'd think hers would know the proper word.

And a word about italics. They get annoying to read in large quantities. They're also meant to separate things as different. But when the whole thing is different, nothing is. The reader will already pick up how this is being presented as recordings. You don't need the italics to convey that. If they were short recordings interspersed in lots of "live" narration, then there would be a justification in setting them apart, but there's no need to do that for the way you have it.

It might help to put an [hr] between log entries.

>There's a lot of other Talons up her too//

Typo.

>Even if its just me//

Its/it's confusion. Since it's either a computer putting the audio into text or the reader kind of listening to the recording, there are some things it wouldn't make sense to assume she got wrong.

>I' have//

Extraneous apostrophe.

>but... I've//

>they're...they//
Inconsistent ellipsis format. It's preferred to put a space after, unless it starts a sentence, because it plays better with FiMFiction's typesetting, but either format is okay as long as you use the same one throughout.

>Ponies they're//

And it seems like that was supposed to be "there."

>It was, sickening.//

Why is there a comma here?

I mentioned two possibilities before, and I think it's going to make more sense to take this as the reader listening to the recording instead of seeing a text transcript of it. That means it's more reasonable to use ellipses, since it'd be tough to explain to a speech-to-text algorithm which pauses should be ellipses, commas, semicolons, periods, dashes, or just about anything. But taking it as an audio log has its own issues, namely that it wouldn't make sense to have certain kinds of errors, like the aforementioned its/it's confusion. They sound the same, so who's to say which is recorded? There's no reason to choose the wrong one, because then you're presuming Gilda meant the wrong one or the listener hears the wrong one, neither of which is justifiable. This does mean it'd help if you were more judicious about putting commas between clauses. Here's an example I pulled from a little later on:
>I've cut zebras in half on the battlefield, so I'm no stranger to entrails and the like, but that was nothing compared to that building.//
You got this one right. Whenever there's a passage where each subject gets its own verb (I've cut..., so [I am]..., but that was...), you set it off with commas.
>There was a mare in the office too but she had nothing to say after she succumbed to a sudden case of decapitation.//
Here's an example of a spot that needs one. You do have separate subject-verb pairs, but there's no comma to separate the clauses (There was... but she had).

I guess I don't have a picture of who Gilda is yet. She's tough enough to take out the whole Steelworks, but she doesn't have much sway with the military or pegasi.

>Twenty Seventh//

In all these dates, when the ordinal number has two words, put a hyphen between them. Same deal with the cardinal numbers of the years, if that comes up later.

>Found some a lot of ingots//

Jumbled wording.

>High grade//

Hyphenate.

More than in the previous version, you're starting to wander into things that a reader would have to be familiar with Fallout: Equestria to understand. I haven't read it. I don't know what the Curtain or the Luna are. I can guess the latter is a ship, but I don't know what significance it has or why Gilda wants to destroy it. In crossover stories, don't assume the reader knows anything other than canon MLP.

>Luna//

Ship names get italicized. Of course it already is, since everything is (though it shouldn't be).

>its only a pyre//

>maybe its magic or something//
>Knowing who its made to look like//
Its/it's confusion.

>stuck up//

>Fifty Two//
Hyphenate.

>Talons//

You sometimes capitalize that and sometimes don't.

>I found a Ministry of Peace hospital just outside the lethal zone. It was inhabited, but it isn't now.//

I don't know whether that means it was once inhabited but anyone there died in the attack on the city, or if Gilda found someone there and killed them.

>fro this place//

Typo.

>their front's//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>screaming 'that's what everypony says!'.//

Punctuate and capitalize that like dialogue. And the period at the end is extraneous.

>manticore or something//

Missing period.

>played open//

I assume you mean "splayed."

>I'm sorry Dash.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>its still deadly//

Its/it's confusion.

>I looks like the shield went down.//

Typo.

>I think its radiation//

Its/it's confusion.

>no where//

That's one word.

>I'm sorry Dash.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>December Twenty Third, Year one.//

You'd been capitalizing the year numbers. But it looks like you stop doing so here. It goes on like this, at least for the few more dates I scanned ahead to see.

>Pip-Buck//

There was one time a while back where you didn't capitalize both words.

>I heading out//

Typo.

>Lot's of game.//

You have a possessive where you need a plural.

>eating them like crazy so they can't be bad. The things are growing like crazy//

Reptitive phrasing. And there are ways to check if something's poisonous. Wouldn't she know that?

>cave, They're//

Comma should be a period.

>Damn, it's been a long ass time since I've used this thing.//

Seems odd to have a 12-year time skip and not comment on why.

>About a third of them foals//

Missing period.

>hoof made//

That'd probably be one word like "handmade." Except why is a griffon using a "hoof" word?

>Its a little big//

Its/it's confusion.

>Ooooooooooo!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>I was going to start yelling for somepony to come help, I didn't want to go get her myself.//

Comma splice.

>left eh kids//

Typo.

>I had to make a silencer for my rifle//

Where's she getting the material and tools for this? For that matter, where's she getting the toys for the kids?

>If they knew even half the things I've done they run away in terror.//

Typo.

>Next time I get out of the valley//

Well, there it is. She should mention this earlier.

>I just, don't like leaving them alone.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>fifty nine//

Hyphenate.

>I'm sorry Dash.//

Comma for direct address.

>I spent a hundred round//

Typo.

>My pistols don't have silencers to it was only an hour before the parents rushed into the clearing at the Ice Caverns' entrance.//

Typo.

>I cleared out all the bodies//

How'd she get rid of the blood? Or don't they have any? If not, here's a spot where someone unfamiliar with the crossover isn't going to understand.

>its all my fault//

Its/it's confusion.

>and tall the younger ponies//

Typo.

>its some kind of blasphemy//

Its/it's confusion. You get this right sometimes. I'm not sure what the deal is.

>Its not much//

I'm just going to list these when I see them. It's taking too much time to type "Its/it's confusion" over and over again.

>he bastards..//

Needs one more dot.

>All the younger mare's are alive//

You keep mixing up possessives with plurals.

>Fuck I should have been watching the entrance!!!//

Unless this was something she wrote out herself, I don't know how a recording device would differentiate three exclamation marks over one.

>sand bangs//

Typo.

>their isn't in green foliage//

Several typos.

>They have all the mare's and foals//

Possessive/plural. I mean, you get "foals" right. Why is "mares" any different?

>run .//

Extraneous space.

>I am going to hurt them SO much!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>Its all fresh off the assembly line.//


>bleeding out on the ground//

>bled out on the ground//
Pretty repetitive so close together.

>make shift//

That's one word.

>If these bucks are scared than the rest of their comrades should be scared too.//

Than/then confusion.

>questions, to ask them after all//

No reason to have a comma there.

>'Stable 34 territory acquisition expedition//

Where's that quotation supposed to close?

>'We're so sorry spirit', 'please don't hurt us spirit', 'we didn't want to hurt anypony Storm Mother'.//

Needs commas for direct address.

>their trying to shoot//

Typo.

>December First.//

That period needs to be a comma.

>Ambush at the yeti Geyser.//

Not sure why "geyser" is capitalized. Or if it's a place name, why "yeti" isn't.

>I let through leave//

Typo.

>ponies Young//

Missing period.

>It's been a real long time since I used this thing, this will be my last recording.//

Comma splice, and there are several more in this entry.

>here....//

One too many dots.

>took about twenty tries before I could do it with coughing up blood or crying //

Sounds like you meant that to be "without."

>Its nice//

>Its comfortable.//

>Take care of your home my Children.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>You must all be kind to each.//

Missing an "other."

The expansion definitely makes it clearer what's going on and adds more emotional depth. Since I'm not familiar with Fo:E, though, I don't know when this is supposed to take place. Would Gilda have made up with Dash as in "The Lost Treasure of Griffonstone"? Would "Griffon the Brush-Off" have happened? I don't know where we are in Gilda's relationship with Dash. And that informs what it meant for that to end. I gather Gilda killed her because she was paid to, though I don't know whether it was a straight-up hit job or just a bounty on ponies in general. Without that kind of background, I don't know how big a deal it is that Gilda killed her. She regrets it so badly later, but then I don't understand why she could have done it in the first place. It's not like Gilda had some wholesale personality change that made her a different person in that regard. Either there's supposed to be a change that wasn't conveyed, or Gilda's just being inconsistent.

That's really the only story issue for me. Other than that, there's just a lot of mechanical clean-up that needs to happen. It's not unusual for extensively rewritten material to have new issues pop up, but it felt like this was cleaner before. A lot of these things are pretty obvious.

Hold on, let me revisit her age. She says she's 60 in year 14. then in year 40, she says she's 85. Wouldn't she be 86? And she's still marauding around. How long do griffons live? If that's a piece of Fo:E lore, I don't know it. Then she dies in year 55, short of her birthday, so she's 100. Ponies, at least, seem to have pretty human lifespans, and you even allude to such (14 being very young to get pregnant, for instance). Unless griffons are much longer-lived than ponies, it's kind of hard to buy her doing all this at such an advanced age.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3012

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Why'd you put the title in quotes?

>Larger than life//

>hundred carat//
When you use multi-word phrases as single descriptors like this, hyphenate them.

Your perspective is pretty unsteady so far. You obviously start the story with an external viewpoint, but as you ease into it, it seems to take on Rarity's perspective, or possibly remain omniscient. There's nothing decidedly limited about the narration, until we get to this:
>Yet Rarity still appeared completely unfazed//
The opening narrator wasn't a character, because he's clearly self-aware that it's a story. But this statement is from a character viewpoint. "Seemed" is a judgment call. Seemed to whom? I don't know. And that's the kind of context that informs perspective. It's not the same narrator we stated with, because he'd know if she was unfazed; "seem" wouldn't enter into it.

>Unicornia!!!//

One exclamation mark is plenty.

>sequins that drew the eye back to that one perfect diamond that shone like a beacon!//

The two "that" clauses get a bit repetitive when tacked so close together, but technically, both of them should be "which." You're not creating a subcategory; you're just saying this particular diamond and these particular sequins have these characteristics.

>Then a particularly extravagant spin left her facing the edge of the ship and she blindly stepped forward into empty air…//

You've got a number of spots like this, where you need a comma between the clauses.

Right after that first picture, we get assaulted with "as" clauses. You have all these within the space of just 3 paragraphs:
>as she sashayed along the railing//
>as they saw that a sparkling bridge of blue light had materialized beneath the mode//
>as he followed her onto the bridge//
>as he walked past//
>as the music reached its swelling finale//
This and the participial phrase can be wonderfully descriptive, but they're also uncommon enough in everyday usage that they easily stand out as repetitive, and a lot of authors overuse them.

>reached its swelling finale, they reached//

Close word repetition.

>through which she now played a blood-pumping solo on her guitar//

There have been three female characters (well, the reader's left to intuit that the "rainbow-maned pegasus" is female) mentioned in the sentence already, so it's ambiguous who "she" is.

>a figure wearing a cloak that hid all their features//

This is also inconsistent with the omniscient narrator hat you seem to favor. As omniscient, he'd know who this was. There are ways to make the language work and keep the secret, but the narrator or perspective character needs a reason to.

>When Rarity makes art it doesn’t matter what era//

Needs a comma in there.

>“isn’t

>“no//
Capitalization.

>Let me just cut you off right there, Darling.//

"Darling" is a generic term of endearment. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>a particularly fancy skybridge//

There's an opinion creeping into the narration again, but I don't know whose. And whatever personality the seemingly omniscient narrator took on at the beginning of the story has been missing ever since, so it's not him.

>this way, darling//

That's already her third time saying "darling" in this scene. If you look through episode transcripts, she doesn't actually eay it that often, usually no more than two or three times in an entire episode.

>Why don’t we ask him?//

When you italicize w rod for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>definitely not grape juice//

This goes to perspective again. Why's the narrator making a big deal about this? What would matter if it was wine?

>yelling “Thank//

Needs a comma.

Now that you have a scene with Applejack, it's very consistently a limited narration in her perspective. That just leaves me confused about what the narrative voice was supposed to be before now.

>she flew over the earth pony//

Well, now it's slipped. Why would AJ call herself "the earth pony"? In your own head, do you call yourself "the person"?

>Applejack looked hurt.//

How can she see herself to tell? The perspective's somewhere else, but not necessarily with her cousin. Though that's the only other option, I guess.

>I just don’t want to see you hurt again.//

And this use of "hurt" in the same paragraph is repetitive.

>Before Twilight could reply someone tapped her shoulder.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>Turning around//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>she saw Applejack wearing a very odd dress//

So this is in Twilight's perspective...
>Rainbow Dash was the first to find her voice, and naturally the first thing she did with it was laugh.//
This might still be in Twilight's perspetive, but it sounds more like it'd be Rarity's or AJ's...
>She looked around and saw a good vantage point in a nearby tower.//
Now you're in Rarity's head...
>They had never seen fashion like this before!//
And now you're in some kind of collective viewpoint. This is all in the first page.
>But Ginger was hardly listening, already planning on how she would try again.//
Into Ginger's perspective now. It's bouncing all over the place.

>into— ”//

Extraneous space.

>back at Ponyville//

I'd normally see this phrased with "in."

>bu-//

Please use a proper dash for cutoffs.

>Rarity’s reply sounded rehearsed//

This has to be from AJ's perspective...
>Rarity stood up and rounded on the other mare with such suddenness that Applejack had to take a step back.//
But this is unidentifiable. The "had to take a step back" feels like AJ's, but it's strange for either one of them to call AJ "the other mare."

>Taint//

'Tain't

>Applejack’s voice remained strong and self-assured as ever, but her stance told a different story as she continued to back away, her broad shoulders tensing. Rarity’s body language was also different. Gone was the grace of the dainty lady, and in its place was something almost predatory.//

And you're switching perspective in the middle of the paragraph here.

>A fifty carat diamond with a good cut and clarity, it would make a fine addition to any collection.//

Fifty-carat. And while that's not technically a comma splice, it sure feels like one.

>“Blue Topaz”, Rarity thought//

Comma placement.

>Rarity looked away//

>looking affronted//
>Everyone looked at Rarity.//
>“Look, you have a lot of talent.//
That's all in just 3 paragraphs. "Look" is a word many authors tend to overuse.

>I can’t decide who I fall in love with//

I don't gather how this follows from "I'm just a regular mare." Do exceptional mares decide who they fall in love with?

>She did not hear Applejack knocking//

How does she know AJ knocked, then? You've mostly been using a limited narration, so the narrator is essentially the focus character. If Rarity doesn't know AJ knocked, neither does the narrator.

>T'was//

'Twas

>darling.” Rarity said//

Punctuation.

>Somepony made themselves your problem and you treated them much better than you had to.//

Why is AJ making pretty much the opposite argument that she had the day before?

I realize you were very hampered by word count limits, but all of the romantic attractions here are things I just have to accept the story's word for. None of the characters actually justify their infatuations. I don't know what Ginger actually likes about Rarity that she would consider her good relationship material. Same goes for whatever Rarity likes about AJ. It's on the absurd side, but you're not tagging this as comedy, so that's not the angle you're taking. In that case, I really am looking for this to be an authentic portrayal of an earnest love interest, but it's just surface-level, and it's hard to stand out from the crowd of all the other stories that do the same thing. For that matter, the emotional climax of Ginger having to face rejection occurs off camera, so I'm just left to imagine what impact that's had on her, or at the least, to take AJ's vague description of it.

Really, the two biggest things are that the love interest lacks depth and the perspective skips around between limited perspectives and an omniscient voice.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3019

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

You've done a good job using a close limited narrator. The narration expresses Ghost's opinions as if his own, essentially becoming her. But there are a few hiccups. Look at this one:
>Ghost thought that the mochas weren’t half bad here//
She wouldn't think, "I though the mochas weren't half bad here." She'd just think, "The mochas weren't half bad here." By forcing that "Ghost thought" in there, you're putting distance between Ghost and the narrator, who's now a middleman instead of being identically Ghost.

>Four- no//

Please use a proper dash. Alt+0151 = —. And don't put space on either side of it. This goes for the whole story. Don't use hyphens for asides and interruptions.

>Ghost hated the crowds in the supermarket//

This one isn't too bad, but it's a little clinical. Let the tone come through in how she says it, something like "those crowds in the supermarket always grated on her nerves."

>That was at a different cafe, though//

>It was in the past, though//
Kind of repetitive phrasing in the same paragraph.

>She wished she had a social life//

There are two classes of verbs you should only use sparingly in a close limited narration like this. The first governs perception. Since Ghost essentially is the narrator, they share the same perception. If the narrator says something is there, it's implicit that Ghost sees it. You should never have to say she saw, heard, felt, etc. anything, unless you really want to add emphasis that she was on the lookout for it or it was something most people would miss. The other class of verbs governs knowledge, things like want, wish, know, wonder, etc. Instead of using these, express them through tone. Like here, instead of saying she wished this, express it as a longing: If only she had a social life. That gets the wish across, but in a much more personal way.

>The door chimed announced//

Typo.

>thinking that it was mighty rude to not order anything, and hoping that her opinion didn’t show on her face//

A couple more of those types of verbs here that could be more powerful through narrative tone.

>That would be the sixteenth time she wiped the same spot, she mused//

Similar. You don't need the "she mused." Just let the narrator express the thought on her behalf.

>Another customer, hoorah! Ghost felt she could almost cheer at the sound.//

Well, she did cheer. Just not out loud.

>Her changeling friend may work with the royal guards//

Verb tense is off here. You need "may have worked."

>The changeling looked around.//

This is another advanced point about perspective, but you're implying this is the phrasing Ghost would choose to describe her friend. That feels very formal and external. In your own head, do you refer to your best friend as "the person"? More likely you'd use a name or pronoun.

>The changeling looked panicked for a moment, looking around.//

Another very impersonal reference to her best friend, and a close repetition of "look." And instead of saying Misty looks panicked, which is an abstract thing, make it concrete. Tell me how she looks and acts, and let me conclude that it's panic.

>Misty nodded, and sat down at a table nearby//

You only need the comma before the conjunction if it starts a new clause, and not even always then. You don't have a subject for the verb after "and"; it shares the same subject as "nodded," so it's not a new clause, just a compound verb.

>walked in a few minutes late and relieved her, before walking//

Close word repetition.

>The unicorn prodded her friend//

And that's even weirder than calling her friend "the changeling." She'd actually refer to herself as "the unicorn"? Do you think of yourself as "the human"?

>warm.“Hey//

Needs a space.

>you?” She teased//

Looks like you meant that to be a speech tag so don't capitalize it.

>Whatever trouble Misty Step was in, she resolved to do the best she could to try to fix it.//

This sounds rather calm for the situation, which tends to undermine the tension it creates. And undermining tension isn't a good way to end a chapter.

>Misty frowned and huddled against her warmer, warm-blooded friend//

It'd make sense for Ghost to refer to Misty as "her friend," but not for Ghost to refer to herself as "Misty's friend."

Before I move on to chapter 2, a word about your synopsis. It tells me nothing about your story, only that a pony and her changeling friend go on an adventure. That's incredibly generic. It's not going to grab readers' interest. Give me a taste of what's going to happen in the story.

>he put away her keys and flipped on the lights, revealing a cozy little apartment. In one corner was a heap of blankets and cushions, arranged into a nest.//

It's fine that you want to give a description of her apartment, but she's the limited narrator, so you have to give her a motivation to discuss it. This sounds like the once-over a first-time visitor would give, but both she and Misty are familiar with it. Find ways to work in these details. Take that last sentence. There's no reason for her to say it. It's normal to her, it's not relevant to what is happening, and she wouldn't notice it unless you give it a reason to stand out to her. Something like "In one corner was a heap of blankets and cushions, arranged into a nest that she hadn't gotten around to cleaning up for weeks now." That gives a reason for her to describe it, namely, that she sees it as a mess she needs to clean up.

>In one corner was//

>Taped to the pillow nest was//
>Across the room were//
>On the table was//
These are the beginnings to four sentences in a row. See how repetitive they are?

>She hoped she had something that Misty liked reading.//

Why? They haven't discussed anything like this.

>In one corner of the room was//

Now you're back to that phrasing and one you already used.

>Ghost made a mental note to clean those when she got the chance//

>Ghost made a mental note to clean out.//
More repetitive phrasing.

>The apartment was small, crowded, but cozy, and Ghost was proud that she had such a nice place to live.//

You pretty much already said this earlier:
>revealing a cozy little apartment//

>They worked for Chrysalis, and were waiting for the right moment to take over again//

You don't need that comma. It's just a compound verb.

>I’ll have my job back//

We're not going to get an explanation of this?Be careful how you give it, though. Ghost would already know the story, so it wouldn't make sense for Misty to tell her. You have to find other ways of hinting at it.

>She shruggedd//

Typo.

>She points at a few cacti sitting on her shelf.//

Why are you in present tense here? And Ghost already said she had two cacti.

>This was a problem, because the fire had spread over her bed and was slowly making its way around her.//

This is phrased very calmly, given this:
>The heat was unbearable, and the smoke made her cough.//

>She wondered//

Another one of those verbs you can do without.

>That was a terrifying dream, for many reasons.//

But the narration doesn't sound terrified. And beware of referring to generic things like the "many reasons" here. I don't know what any of them are, so I have no way to identify with her. Briefly list a couple of them.

>Misty,” She sighed//

>right?” She inquired//
Capitalization.

>her abomination meal//

I love this.

>Ghost managed a grimace that slightly resembled an encouraging smile.//

How does she know what it looks like? She can't see it.

>Misty trotted into the bathr//

Something got cut off there.

>Ghost sighed as she tossed her back into her apartment.//

Are you sure this is phrased how you wanted? I don't understand it.

>While the class went on about sine and cosine//

I thought you said this was an algebra class. That's trigonometry.

>written in worse handwriting than Ghost wrote in.//

Kind of repetitive phrasing. Just leave it as "written in worse handwriting than Ghost's." For that matter, it isn't handwriting. I typically see it called hoofwriting (closer parallel to the earth term) or mouthwriting (closer to what non-unicorns actually do)/hornwriting.

>Ghost started up a pot of her favorite jasmine tea, and grabbed another book.//

Unnecessary comma.

>Sometimes, Ghost thought as she warmed up a towel in her magic, it really sucks to be right.//

Your presentation of that is closer to dialogue. If you want it that way, use quotation marks or italics for the thought. But you can remove the thought tag and just state it as narration, in past tense.

>any of their behavior follow//

>this criteria//
Singular/plural mismatch.

>hastily-scrawled//

You don't need a hyphen for a two-word phrase starting in an -ly adverb.

>The unicorn//

Another strangely external reference, this time to herself. I haven't been marking every one of these, by the way. You should go through the whole story for them.

>coffeemaker//

>coffee making//
Strange that you have one of those as a single word and the other as two.

>business pony//

This would likely be one word, like the human equivalent.

>list.” She mumbled//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>decypher//

I've always seen that as "decipher," but if you're used to this spelling, it's fine.

>icey//

icy

>which had spread behind the counter and out towards the customer’s chairs, which were thankfully vacated//

It's kind of clunky to have two "which" clauses stacked up like that.

>happened?” Blurted//

Capitalization.

>refridgerator//

This might also be a regional spelling, but I've only seen "refrigerator."

>until it shined like new//

"Shined" takes a direct object. You want "shone."

>“Waffles!” Squealed//

Capitalization.

>ectacy//

Typo.

>shquares~” She//

Capitalization.

>added “I’ll//

Needs a comma.

>pushing a crosswalk button over and over//

I love this.

>ruined page//

You just used "ruining" in the last paragraph.

>going.” Ghost murmured//

Punctuation.

>Was she really that surprised about how easy it was to miss out on the lecture.//

Isn't that a question?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3023

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>wished — for//

Don't leave space on either side of an em dash.

You've got some questionable semicolons. In formal usage, you should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but many of yours would result in sentence fragments.

>A sigh of disappointment escaped her lips.//

Beware directly identifying emotion like this. It's often better to demonstrate it through character behavior and appearance, so that the reader can draw his own conclusion—this mimics how people judge each other in real life anyway. But in these "in/with/of emotion" phrasings, there's usually already something in the sentence to convey the mood. Here, the sigh and what she'd been musing already get across disappointment.

>Tempest’s surprise was apparent in her gaze and in her voice.//

Consider you've been using a limited narrator in Tempest's perspective so far. But she can't see her own face, so how does she know what her expression looks like, much less that it's "apparent"? Besides, it doesn't vocalize the emotion well. When you're surprised, you have a "wait, what?" moment, not a calm, "oh, that surprises me." This could stand to come across as more authentic. How she looks isn't going to be her clue as to how she feels anyway. You don't have to look in a mirror to know you're happy, after all.

>she cut her off//

That's already what the dash means. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>“As you wish,” Twilight nodded.//

You're using a non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>laying down and getting comfortable//

"Lay" and "lie" are tough verbs to keep straight, but you need "lying" here.

As this conversation starts, compare the flavor of the narration to what it was at the beginning of the scene. Early on, it was very expressive of Tempest's thoughts and opinions. Now it's just spouting factual statements. Inject some of those flavorful-toned sentences fairly regularly, or it will sound like you've reverted to an omniscient narration.

Consider character voicing. Twilight's speech sounds virtually identical to Tempest's. If I picked out a random statement, I doubt I'd be able to decide who said it based on voice alone. Maybe from the circumstances of what it actually said but not how it said it. You want to give these characters distinct voices. For that matter, you're affecting a very cumbersome voice for both. Purple, florid language has its place, but extemporaneous musings and off-the-cuff dialogue aren't usually a good use for it. At least Twilight could believably have this level of vocabulary, but Tempest didn't especially seem to in the movie, and you're not giving her a reason why she would.

>Surely even among the diplomacy-obsessed Equestrians//

Pretty repetitive to start two sentences in a row with that word.

>Tempest snorted, a mixture of exasperation and quiet amusement on her breath.//

Again, odd for her to outright identify her mood rather than the effect it's having on her. From her perspective, the effect would be the more noticeable thing.

>a bit of//

You use this phrase is consecutive sentences.

>“And at the risk of sounding too pleased with myself,” she looked up to meet Tempest’s gaze.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag again.

>delicious food//

How does she know it is? She hasn't tasted it yet.

>shocking and intriguing//

Yet the narration reacts to Twilight very calmly, not as if it's intrigued and shocked.

>“Not quite what I meant,” Tempest shook her head.//

Non-speaking action as speech tag.

>real friends that cared about you//

It's preferred to use "who" instead of "which" or "that" when referring to sentient beings.

>“I didn’t,” she nodded.//

Non-speaking action as speech tag.

>a hole in her heart that she didn’t know she had//

You already spoke to hunger she didn't know she had. It's kind of a cliched thought, as well as being repetitive, but I can't tell if the repetition is intended. I doubt it, but there could actually be a very interesting thematic link here. The key is to make it obvious you're doing it on purpose by acknowledging the repetition. You could have her liken it to the earlier hunger, for example.

>“I never realized.” She finally said.//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>panoply//

You can keep this if you like, but for me, it's an odd word choice. "Panoply" implies a covering that's all over, but this one is only on the horizon. It also connotes something protective, which isn't the case here.

>takedown//

It's kind of weird that you've repeatedly used this to describe his defeat.

>“Thank you for your offer. But I’m learning to be more comfortable with who I am.”//

Looks like there's an inadvertent line break here.

>He gaze//

Typo.

>again, but stopped short. A curious notion washed over her. She looked to the decanter and once again focused on her magic. Her horn sparked again//

That's three uses of the same word very close together.

>“No.” She said quietly to herself.//

Punctuation/capitalization.

There's some nice characterization here, but I'm confused. You submitted it as a complete story and didn't give a synopsis of forthcoming chapters, but on FiMFiction, it's marked as incomplete. The incomplete is probably an oversight on your part (I believe it's the default when you create a story), but it really does feel incomplete.

There's not a big moment of character change here, and Tempest doesn't struggle wih it much. She does wrestle a bit with understanding why Twilight acts the way she does, but not with accepting Twilight's attitude, and it's really that struggle that would or wouldn't introduce tension in to the story. If it's something worth having, it's something worth fighting for, so let me see Tempest's fight to attain what it is she wants here, and let me see Twilight fight to help her get it. When there's just a direct path from need to success without any obstacles, it's hard for the story to make a compelling case. And then when she does get it, there's no catharsis for her.

For that matter, I'm not sure why you're tagging this as AU. There's some talk of a council which may or may not fit into canon, but it's relatively unimportant to what's happening.

I liked your characterization of Tempest, but Twilight's voice is pretty indistinguishable from hers, and it could use some higher-stakes and less easily resolved conflict.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3024

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>well,they//

Missing space.

>There was reason//

Missing word.

>six pointed//

Hyphenate.

>cutiemark//

That's two words.

>well deserved//

Hyphenate.

>Twilight- urk//

Please use a proper dash for interruptions and asides. You have a number of these throughout the story.

>bone crushing//

Hyphenate. Whenever you have a multi-word descriptor used as a single adjective in fron of what it describes, hyphenate the phrase.

>fore legs//

That's one word.

>“Oh, I’m still going”//

Missing period.

>and tried to recall the whirlwind of books and dusty scrolls of that day.//

You'd been using Twilight as your perspective character, but this is within Spike's head.

>lung crushing//

Hyphenate, but that's pretty repetitive with the earlier "bone-crushing."

>out the equation//

Missing word.

>Spike felt the now all-too-familiar embrace of a super-strong alicorn.//

You keep flipping back and forth btween their perspectives, and not in a way that an omniscient narrator would.

>change Rarity’s dress and mask to better suit her new look//

How does she know it'll suit her better? She's not exactly fashionable.

>This would be her spells greatest test//

Missing apostrophe.

>and she payed dearly for a few months back//

Missing word.

>doors.” she said//

Punctuation. And I don't get Luna's point. Why would Rarity be the only one to serve as an example?

>she desperately wishes she there could’ve been another way//

Wording is off.

>her Mom//

I won't get into the grammatical dtails here, but if you'd said just "Mom" here, it would need to be capitalized, but with the "her" in front of it, it shouldn't be.

>Tutancalmel//

Did you mean that to be "camel"?

>If there is a universal constant, then Pinkie is the certainly the universal variable. But if there is one thing Twilight can count on, it’s her friends//

Why are you switching to present tense here?

>lantern lit//

Hyphenate.

>in place like this…//

Missing word.

>wished she had stop breathing//

Syntax is off.

>all she could do is watch her friend melt in front of her eyes//

The comma before this is a splice, and you've gone to present tense again.

>Her only response were//

Singular/plural mismatch.

>when Luna pulled similar stunt//

Missing word.

>ended up finding her hiding in the closet, and thinking she was just vermin, ended up//

Repeated phrasing.

>was out of limelight//

Missing word.

>How had Pinkie not succumb to its power?//

Typo. And I haven't been marking many of the perspective shifts, but this is another. Most of the scene was in Twilight's, but you're going to Celestia here.

Aside from the mechanical things, the biggest issue here is the jumpy perspective. It's a bad idea to skip around to different viewpoints in this limited a narrator, because it can be confusing an jarring when the narrative view keeps changing. It also defeats the purpose of using a limited narrator like this, as the reader's never given the time to settle into the different viewpoints. It'd help if you tried to stick to one character per scene.

Plot-wise, the biggest issue is that Twiligt wanted to make the point that her friends are all as important as her. But given the opportunity to, she never does. To her friends, sure, but they already knew that. She didn't make the point to the crowd, which was the outcome she really wanted.

Consider also that the stakes were never very high. The biggest one of all is that Rarity was upset her dress wouldn't get used. Pinkie and Dash didn't have any issues, Applejack didn't even turn up until afterward, and Fluttershy immediately recovered, so the effect on her wasn't significant. Rarity immediately forgave her, too. When everything gets solved so easily without anyone becoming too upset it undermines that there was anything serious going on in the first place.

Even Twilight's problem seems a little misplaced. She's not uncomfortable with the spotlight; she just wanted that spotlight shining on her friends, but she's in the perfect position to make sure it is, so was there some other reason she was desperately avoiding it? That doesn't come out, and it's not used to balance out the justifcation for her actions, such that the other girls understand why she did it and agree to meet in the middle somewhere. Twilight just kind of comes to the conclusion that she never really had an argument in the first place. Resolve that conflict, don't nullify it. They do apologize to her, but really, for what? None of them were acting unreasonably.

If that mask at the end is so potentially dangerous, why is it so easy for someone to gain access to it? It's also a strange diversion from the story's message to have this tangent that doesn't go anywhere.

There's a nice idea in this story, albeit one that's been done plenty of times before, but it could use some focus on the depth of the emotional journey for all involved. Let me see the stakes involved: what Twilight wants, what she's willing to do to get it (so far, you've got those), and what bad thing will happen if she doesn't. And throw some more obstacles in her path. The only major one is Rarity getting upset; all the rest just solve themselves.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3039

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The magenta pony//

You're using Tempest as your perspective character. That means you're having her refer to herself using this type of phrase. Who does that?

>the taller mare//

Again, you're having Tempest refer to herself this way.

>the other unicorn//

Similarly, why would she use a reference like this for someone she knows? You don't think of your acquaintances using language like this.

>Taking a quick breath, she rattled off//

Note that participles make things happen at the same time. So she's speaking while inhaling.

>After she started talking about the incinerator room, she just tuned her out.//

This gets convoluted as to which one of them each "she" refers to.

Now I'm going to illustrate something. I'm going to copy out every participial phrase I see in the first scene.
>hidden behind the doors in Twilight's abode//
>turning another corner in the hallway//
>Turning a corner//
>raising an eyebrow//
>Laughing nervously at Tempest's complete non-reaction//
>Taking a few seconds to ponder the proposal//
>crying//
>Rounding the corner//
>turning around//
>Taking a quick breath//
>Noticing that Starlight had finished her spiel//
>trying to remember the directions//
>Double-checking to make sure she had found the pool//
>Freezing for a few seconds//
That's quite a lot. Not overwhelmingly so, but authors of moderate experience tend to rely on this structure too much. They don't turn up a lot in everyday conversation, so they're unusual and stand out easily. Similar are absolute phrases and "as" clauses, and you have your share of those as well:
>as Tempest Shadow, only a few days into her new life, turned a corner and continued her steady pace//
>as the candelabras and other wall decorations passed by//
>as she slammed into another resident of the castle//
>as the other mare shook her head//
>a slight blush rising on her features//
>As Tempest continued to stare silently//
>as the taller mare passed//
>as Starlight continued her "easy" directions to what should have been a simple room//
>her horn-stub dropping electric blue sparks on the floor//
So just watch that you're not getting structurally repetitive.

>protege//

As she's a female, it's technically protegee.

>Ducking under the table//

>Closing the book//
>Seeing she had been acknowledged//
>Chuckling nervously//
I've already made my point about these, but look how you've started 4 paragraphs in a row with participial phrases. That's also very repetitive.

>so, she won't//

There's rarely a reason to put a comma after a conjunction.

>shocked and embarrassed//

That doesn't really describe how she looks. It's just identifying the emotion. It's more like real life when I get a picture and have to evaluate it. So what does Starlight do here? If you describe her reaction well, the reader will deduce these emotions without you having to mention them at all.

>anger and embarrassment//

Yeah, don't just name emotions like that.

>Sunset." Starlight said, give a few soft hoofclaps//

Punctuation, typo. In fact, it looks like you have this punctuation problem quite a bit. If dialogue ends in a period, then replace the period with a comma when you add a speech tag after it.

>We've all got some stories to tell, why don't we see if Cheerilee would let us present them to her class?//

Comma splice.

>cutiemarksarereallyimportantandtheyshouldn'tmakeyoufeeljealous//

Consider that this is supposed to represent her speaking quickly, yet it actually takes longer to read than separate words. It's creating he exact opposite effect. It's better to write this out normally and just say in the narration that she speakd it very fast.

>Those are hands.//

Minotaurs have them. Plenty of creatures have hand-like claws. Why are they so alien to the students?

>—” She beat her hoof against the diagram a couple of times to emphasize—”to//

Be consistent with your dash placement. Either they both go with the speech (which means she stops talking for the action) or both with the narration. And don't capitalize an aside in a quote like this.

>and snarled slightly//

Missing punctuation.

>Ponyville market had always been an impressive sight to visitors.//

You'd been using Tempest as your perspective character. How would she know this?

>Despite being a small town, the market was always filled//

This says the market was a small town.

>whomever was the current mayor//

This is actually a spot for "whoever."

>a reassuring hand//

Yet you just got through making hands sound so mysterious in the schoolhouse.

>metaled hooves//

Why do you keep calling them that?

>laying perfectly still//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight.

>Pausing to dramatically think for a moment, a pink glow//

This says that a pink glow paused to think.

You're basically running through all the same tricks Trixie showed Sunburst. Why not come up with something original?

>The two guffawed at the showpony//

I assume these are modeled after Waldorf and Statler? I approve.

>afraid of having to explain the situation to Twilight//

How does Tempest know this?

>as one Twilight's friends//

Missing word.

>Tempest visibly getting more and more irritated//

How does she know this? She can't see herself, yet you're telling the story from her viewpoint.

>although both it and her magic field seemed to have no effect on the pony//

Now this is being told from Starlight's perspective. To Tempest, "seem" wouldn't enter into it. She'd know.

>Tempest, who was now watching the three ponies with slightly tear-filled eyes//

I'll touch on this in a moment, but this completes a character arc you never started.

>Seeing that Tempest was somewhat upset//

That's more from Twilight's point of view than Tempest's.

On second thought, you didn't quite complete that character arc. So, at the beginning, Tempest is so lackadaisical about joining this group. She has zero interest in it. Why does she? Just to stave off boredom? You have her learn a lesson toward the end, so why not make that a theme through the story. It really needs one, or a lot of it is pointless. And really, the scene at Trixie's show goes on awfully long for something that's both rehashing material from a show episode and not working toward Tempest's character arc.

So why not have Tempest want to join the group? She doesn't even have to be cognizant of why. She might explicitly know she's looking to make friends, or she might just have some unidentified gnawing feeling that she's missing out on something and she hopes she might find it here. Then keep framing every scene through that lens, such that the events are helping her work toward finding that friendship or suffering setbacks.

How to complete it, then? She doesn't have to be completely won over. Even showing her on the road to getting there is fine, but aside from tearing up a little, she didn't show much of a realization that this is something she wants to achieve. Then the ending is pretty weak, as it doesn't have her start to follow through on that. Twilight, of all ponies, isn't even definite about what's happened, and you turn that into a mild joke. Ending on a joke is fine, but you do want the story to have closure. Not necessarily plot closure, to where she's accomplished everything she wants to in friendship, but thematic closure, where the story makes its point.

This was a pretty good story. You have a few mechanical things, like using commas with speech tags and overuse of certain types of phrases, but you also need to tighten up on what the actual story is. Keep things focused and working toward that goal, showing Tempest's progress toward it, both her steps forward and backward. Along those lines, it did seem a little odd for Grubber to show up and then get completely dropped without serving much pirpose. Can he play a role in her character growth? If not, does he really need to be in the story at all?

If you can get those things ironed out, I could see posting this.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3042

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>approximately 19:42 ,//

Extraneous space.

>ambience magic//

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Are you sure this shouldn't be "ambient" magic?

>Eyewitnesses’ account describe the incident as a sudden of swelling of ambience magic for a few seconds before the aforementioned explosion took place. Bystanders describe the ensuing explosion as a burst of a deep purple magic which tore through the roof and wall of the tower, residence of Twilight Sparkle and her assistant, and then shot upwards to the sky before quickly dissipating.//

What's the difference between an eyewitness and a bystander here? The bystander account is of a direct observation, so aren't they also eyewitnesses? And both essentially say the same thing.

>Captain Shining Armour//

Normally, I don't mind the difference between British and American spellings, but this isn't his name.

>a medical revision//

I have no idea what you're trying to say here either. Maybe you meant "evaluation"?

>Being the only known witness of the event besides Miss Sparkle herself, questioning has been scheduled for tomorrow.//

"Being the only known witness of the event besides Miss Sparkle herself" doesn't describe anything in the sentence. Grammatically it refers to the fact that questioning has been scheduled for tomorrow, which doesn't make sense.

>the guard will continue//

"Guard" would be capitalized here, since it's part of the official title of the group.

In chapter 2, I don't understand the difference between what's underlined and what isn't. I assume it's supposed to represent a form with lines there for writing on, but I don't understand the logic behind which sections have them and which don't. If you really want this to look like a form, it might be a better option to make an actual one and put an image of it in here.

>HPI//

Here's where a balancing act comes in. Authenticity says that this is a document for internal hospital use, so they would use common abbreviations for efficiency. However, you're presenting this outside the intended audience, and I don't know what this means.

>lead to believe//

The past tense is "led."

>Further analysis are required//

You're mixing singular and plural there.

> I don't what should be thanked//

Missing word.

>Per testimony of the Royal Guards//

This is a strange phrasing for this form. Why are medical personnel recording testimony?

>Further analysis are required//

Same singular/plural mixture you had for Spike's report.

>I don’t know how soon will the news of what happened reach you//

Syntax is off.

>I was doing the routine check up of the guard//

Just "check" would sound more reasonable here. "Check up" often has a medical connotation.

>We thought it may have been an attack at first, you know we’ve been on the edge//

That's a comma splice. Now since this is a letter the character has written, the error could plausibly be the character's and not the author's, so I guess that depends on whether you're deliberately having him make this error. And the idiom is just "on edge."

>back detachments from all over Equestria back//

Watch the close word repetition.

>the Twilight’s tower//

Extraneous word.

>Princess Celestia herself was flying straight for the tower, part of the roof was caved in. I don’t I don’t know what happened I got there as fast as I could.//

The firs sentence is a comma splice, and the second kind of is, except that it doesn't even have the comma.

>shewas//

Needs a space, and I can't tell why the sentence cuts off. This is the kind of thing that happens in dialogue, not a letter.

>anyof//

Needs a space.

Why didn't Shining Armor sign his letter?

>Residents of the city were rocked early in the night by a loud blast coming from the Royal Castle.//

Why is the byline in a smaller font than the article?

>In the eve//

on the eve

>Southwest//

Why is this capitalized?

>in the proximities of the castle//

If you really want to use that word, a more normal phrasing would be something like "in close proximity to the castle."

>Spike: “How is Twilight? Can I see her?”//

I guess I've never seen an actual interview report, but it seems odd they'd do it in script format. Unless maybe this was taken down by a court reporter or something, but one isn't identified. A poilice officer isn't going to write it down word for word, for example, much less his own dialogue.

>honest...//

And it seems odd that whoever this is would record speech affectations, like trailing off. They're only interested in the facts, not the nuance of how it's said.

>Spike: “… ”//

>Copper: “…”//
This might cut it as video game dialogue, but not in good writing. Whoever is compiling this report is actually going to write this down? I don't buy it.

>However, thanks to the testimony of Spike//

Missing a space between paragraphs.

>ambience magic//

Same issue with that word choice earlier in the story.

>rundown observatory//

"Rundown" is a noun that means a summary. You want "run-down." Though that tends to mean in bad shape through chronic neglect, not ruined by some freak accident.

>delegated investigator//

While it's possible this is a valid meaning (it would mean that the investigator in charge made someone under his command do it instead of him), I think it's more likely you intended something closer to "designated."

>South tower//

I don't know why that would be capitalized, but didn't you earlier say it was the southwest?

>Copper: “…”//

Again, it's not believable she'd write this.

>events of the Summer Sun Celebration has//

You have a mismatch of singular and plural: events... has.

>Strictly off the record.//

This is to Copper's commanding officer, right? Don't they ever see each other in person? Why does Copper have to communicate this via letter?

>several concussions//

I didn't realize it was possible to have more than one at a time. I suppose she could have kept injuring herself, but then I have to question what goes on at this hospital.

>could not be awaken//

Typo.

>Nervous system had suffered a thaumaturgic feedback, causing.//

Causing what?

>protégé//

Twilight's female, so protégée.

>A meeting of the Royal Guard and the Royal Archmage Court, was held at the Royal Canterlot Castle on the fourth of January at noon.//

There's no reason to have that comma.

>Ambience magic//

Same word use issue with that.

>The Guard is still on the look//

on the lookout

>discomfort and uncertainty is//

Plural subject with singular verb.

>expedite//

expedited

I assume they have the authority to present their findings to the public without Celestia's approval? Seems like they're breaking the chain of command here.

>Asure//

Assure

>Southwest tower//

Again, I don't know why you're capitalizing directions, but you've also switched yet again on whether it's the south or southwest tower.

>a private room//

Seems like on all these statements of which room, if it's worth saying where it was at all, it's worth being specific, like noting a room number.

>there were only a few rooms left in the towers to take care//

take care of

>Additionally, if she speaks the truth//

A number of these documents have spots like this where there's a new paragraph without indenting or leacing a blank line. Don't do both, but you need one or the other.

>ambience magic//

I'm going to stop marking these. Just assume you need to sweep all the chapters for this word usage.

>further worked would be required//

Typo.

>As far as the Court is concerned, the matter of the Summer Sun Incident has reached its conclusion.//

Really? They still don't know what magic was used or if Twilight was the one using it.

>Twilight Sparkle casted Dark Magic//

In the sense of magic, the past tense is usually used as "cast."

>Letter of Discharge//

This is not at all how any military would deal with a soldier in Shining Armor's situation. I realize the Royal Guard wouldn't necessarily operate like any Earth nation's army, but it's strange to have such a departure from that when there isn't a need to. And doesn't Shining Armor outrank Lt. Heartmare? How can a lieutenant remove him from duty then?

>Its resident, Twilight Sparkle, who was severely injured in the process.//

That's not a complete sentence.

>protégé//

protégée

>we hope for her soon recovery//

You're using an adverb as an adjective here.

>Actions will be taken to ensure that such an occurrence will not happen again peace and safety which characterise our beloved city.//

Something went wrong here.

>who have maintain//

Typo/

>a homage//

an

>I have no ground to ask for an apology//

Why would she ask for an apology? She should be offering one.

>disgrace has fallen Twilight Sparkle//

befallen

>downed upon Equestria//

dawned

>a millennia//

millennium

I'm a little surprised there wasn't any sort of public announcement. Celestia didn't ask Twilight's parents to keep it secret, after all. I do find it curious how Luna's banishment didn't leave a body behind, but Twilight's did. There's definitely a balancing act where it can feel justified or not as to outright explaining everything for the reader. And in a case like this, where you'd spent many chapters doling out the facts little by little, only to make that all moot by giving up the entire thing, after inviting the reader to assemble all the little clues. It does feel like a let-down, at least for me, but that's secondary at this point.

Primary is to fix all the editing issues and quirks, like all the mechanical errors I noted and the procedural things that didn't make sense (interview reports recorded in script format, essentially having a junior officer relieve his superior officer of duty, etc.)

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3054

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>and—" My sister glanced to her nervous looking elegant orange-maned manager. "—and//

A narrative aside cutting into a quote like that shouldn't be capitalized or end in a period.

>nervous looking//

>foil decorated//
Hyphenate.

I'm barely a couple paragraphs in, and I'm already suffering participle overload. The first paragraph wasn't too bad overall, except the first two sentences both end in a participial phrase, which gives you a repetitive feel right as the story begins. But then look at this sentence:
>Minutes later Sassy and I trotted toward Canterlot Castle up Alicorn Way, levitating foil decorated boxes tied with ribbons and bows, trying to avoid traffic consisting of stallions in suits wearing top hats and mares in spring dresses sporting green bows.//
You have 6 participial phrases in one sentence. That's actually impressive. But it isn't good.

>She threw open the red door to the bottom flat of a duplex brownstone, tossing her keys onto a glass coffee table with a bang.//

Also keep in mind that participles mean things happen simultaneously. So she tosses her keys while opening the door here.

>splashed with paint from a paint factory explosion//

That just sounds self-explanatory. Maybe you need better imagery. Go for something outlandish.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

Canon spelling has "Sugarcube" as one word.

>(And if that last gets back to Scoots or Bloom, I'll know it was you who said it.)//

Wait, who am I? No audience has been mentioned for her. If you're going to do that, establish it up front, but there's more going on here. It depends on how she's telling the story. Am I accompanying her? Or is she telling me/writing about it after the fact? If the former, nobody's acknowledged I'm there. If the latter, it doesn't ring true, since nobody could remember these events in enough detail to reconstruct entire conversations word for word. The way this is typically handled is by jumping to flashback scenes so that the past events can reasonably be presented "live," though there are other ways. I'm just not sure how you intend to portray this, but it isn't working. EDIT: Now that I've read the whole thing, I'd recommend getting rid of this. You barely revisit addressing the reader in any fashion, and you never even identify who "you" is. This bit stands out as the part that doesn't belong with the rest.

>using her horn to boil the kettle//

Rarity doesn't do this in her own kitchen. Seems odd that anyone who wasn't particularly powerful (or who had that as their special talent, I guess) would be able to.

>Sassy and Twilight were the same age.//

Why is Twilight being brought into this? She's not relevant to anything that's happening. Sweetie just mentioned Rarity. Why wouldn't she give Sassy's age relative to her?

>an hurricane-aftermath//

That's not a spot for "an."

>rumbled shirts//

Are you sure you didn't mean "rumpled"?

>sound— the//

Don't put space on either side of an em dash.

>Posters displayed the constellations and aspects of the Milky Way. One displayed//

Watch the close repetition.

>a obsidian//

an

>I— You//

No space.

You've kind of already let on what this colt's deal is when he said it was too noisy at night, so it's a little off-putting that he's not going to tell her now, and she hasn't figured it out.

>wrote on the chalkboard by the door using the chalk in his mouth//

This is agian something that sounds rather self-explanatory, but it also sounds kind of like he had the chalk in there all along.

This colt seems rather matter-of-fact about his parents' deaths. And why is he throwing a sweater at Sweetie Belle?

>which smelled faintly horsey//

Then why'd she put it on? I mean even without the smell, why'd she put it on? He didn't tell her to, and I still don't get why he threw it at her. He hasn't asked her to go anywhere with him, and she hasn't acknowledged that she will.

>the sky turn deep yellow, orange, then crimson. In minutes, the sky started turning blue//

Kind of repetitive. Plus it takes some time for all this to happen. She's already been self-conscious about this seeming like a date, so she's just going to gloss over this time period without comment?

>peddling her legs//

You sure you didn't mean "pedaling"? Even so, it's kind of an odd word choice.

>Blue." I said//

Punctuation.

>It was indeed as silky as I imagined.//

You're really going out of your way to talk up this OC. I understand why Sweetie Belle would do so externally, but I don't know why she'd think he's so great. She doesn't even know him yet. Just be aware of how many readers will take this. It takes a lot of gradual convincing that an OC is worth caring about, and you're kind of forcing the issue. People will assume this is a representation of you.

>"Who?" He asked.//

Capitalization.

>I just smiled. Just//

Watch that close repetition of "just." It's a word many authors tend to overuse.

>Fire Break//

Does Sweetie Belle know him? She hasn't indicated she does, but in her limited narartion, she's come up with his name without it being mentioned.

>as he rubbed Blue's head like a tike as we left//

Kind of clunky to stack up two "as" clauses like that.

>"Yes, princess."//

As a term of address, that would be capitalized.

>There's been some oversights!//

This is just strangely worded. I can't figure out what she means.

>Oh, yes, I remember her when she called herself Pins. She studied to be a doctor, but the dean of the school didn't like her 'prickly' ideas. Right. A good mare. Sweetie Belle, see that Blue visits the office of the exchequer.//

I assume this means Blue is due some kind of inheritance or some such? It's rather strange to bring it up and close the matter in such rapid fashion, not to mention assigning Sweetie Belle the responsibility for handling it. Plus I hope it'll end up being pertinent to the plot that Sassy wanted to be a doctor.

>text checker//

You can't have this both ways. It's her limited narration, so when she heard Luna says it, she's the one who perceived it as the correct word. She can't get it wrong now.

>And with that, she sprung into the sky and soared off.//

She leaves so abruptly and without explanation. It feels more like the plot had no more use for her than she had an actual reason to leave.

>She visited all of Ponyville together in one big dream once//

Did she really swear an entire town to secrecy? I guess there's precedent for that, though. *cough*Equestria Girls*cough*

>That elicited a dainty royal chuckle and I turned to gaze into her royal blue eyes.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>We— I//

Extraneous space.

>first name basis//

first-name basis

>Er— I've//

Extraneous space.

>old mares tales//

old mares' tales

>Tears streamed down his cheeks.//

This is sudden, and she relates it as a mundane fact. It really feels like she's completely unaffected by it.

>Canterlot mountain//

If that's a proper place name, then "mountain" would be capitalized too.

>She cast another spell and a faintly glowing blue bubble formed around each of us.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>lay down//

lie

>He lay//

This seems like an odd word choice. It doesn't connote any urgency.

>"Please," he pleaded.//

That seems self-explanatory.

>"Blue," Luna said, "What did you sense?"//

Because of the way you punctuated that, you're saying both parts of the quote form a single sentence. That's fine. But then you're capitalizing "What" in the middle of a sentence.

>Oh, and I learned that some of the voices he heard were the stars.//

This glosses over a lot, and she's so glib about it that it doesn't carry any weight.

>It was ponies' dreams he heard when he slept.//

That's been obvious from the start.

>dinner." Luna said//

>sister." she said//
Punctuation.

>her sisters' ear//

You have a plural possessive where you need a singular.

There are a number of editing issues, and I'll step aside for a minute to sy that I have been keeping up with the previous story you submitted here. I've enjoyed it, but a lot of the same editing mistakes I helped you clear up in the early chapters are popping up again in the newer ones, some of them pretty obvious. I was hoping you'd take a little more care with editing.

In the end, why does it matter that this happened? Sweetie Belle was "hired" to help Blue find his cutie mark, but he didn't. Blue found out what the voices were, but so far, that's been treated as no more than a curiosity. What's he going to do with this knowledge? He's been brought on as Luna's student, probably because she's the best one to instruct him in an ability nobody else has, but it's also just kind of tossed in there. Neither he nor Luna shows too much of a definite plan of what that entails. There's so much that's open-ended here.

Now, open endings are fine, but there's a way to make them work, and that's to establish what the stakes and likelihood of the various possible outcome are. That's really not happening here. All these potential pieces are set into motion, but it' vague about what direction things might head, and nobody seems that emotionally attached to any particular outcome. If the characters don't care that much, it's hard for the reader to. Sweetie Belle's a first-person narrator, so we should have a front-row seat to how all this is affecting her, but she doesn't have a plan and she doesn't seem invested in where things are going.

And that's the biggest weakness here. It feels like I'm tossing along in the current with these events, but they're not heading anywhere.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3067

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>“I owe you an apology, Star Swirl.” She swiveled her neck to look at him.//

She looks at him after she speaks to him?

I'm going to pull out a few sentences to illustrate something.
>AJ raised her foreleg.//
>Star Swirl glanced at Applejack and nodded.//
>She flipped her hoof so that the bottom faced upward.//
>Her green eyes shone as she relived the moment.//
>Applejack nodded.//
>Star Swirl cleared his throat.//
>Twilight thought for a moment.//
>Applejack held her hoof toward her friend.//
>Twilight pursed her lips.//
>AJ stared at the ground.//
>Twilight tilted her head, perplexed as to why Applejack brought up that adventure.//
>Applejack's ears twitched.//
>Star Swirl raised his eyebrows.//
>Applejack waved her foreleg.//
This is a stretch where I've removed all the dialogue and any narration that was just a speech tag. Read down this as if it were a single paragraph. See how plodding it is? Most of the sentences are about the same length and with the same inflection. All of them start with the subject, and most of those subjects are names. It helps mask this when there is dialogue breaking it up, but you still want the narration to flow well, or I'll get the feeling that the speech is fine but the action is dull.

>Much of the land was a patchwork of cultivated fields intersected by thin roads and railways.//

This is a very thin description for a moment that's supposed to be inspirational.

Twilight's using direct address with Star Swirl an awful lot. It's never ambiguous who she's talking to, so it shouldn't be necessary.

Around here, the story's starting to stagnate. You're having Star Swirl do a lot of exposition via dialogue, and a lot of it is stuff the reader should already know. The "as you know" type os expository dialogue always has a really tough time feeling natural.

>“I do not make friends with stupid ponies.”//

That's rather callous of her. Why would she rule them out? I could see her not wanting to be friends with malicious ponies or immoral ones, but stupid? Some ponies just couldn't help being that way, and it doesn't seem like a sentiment Twilight would have.

>“Twilight Sparkle, I apologize for doubting you.

Missing a line break here.

>Seeing that Star Swirl was taking banter well//

Don't over-explain what's going on. This is already apparent.

>entry way//

That's one word.

Now that I'm at the end of chapter 1, I want to paste in an earlier excerpt:
>Was that what they were talking about? Yet her friend didn't appear irate. If anything, she seemed pensive, her eyebrows slightly angled upward.//
This takes a very conversational tone. It's not omniscient. An omniscient narrator would know what they were talking about; he wouldn't have to ask. An omniscient narrator wouldn't bother with "seem" or "appear," unless he was attributing such a perception to a character. Yet most of the chapter feels like it's omniscient. It's very formal and factual, and it never mirrors Twilight's (and I presume she'd be the perspective character, since the excerpt I pulled is told from her viewpoint) emotional state. Plus you use lots of phrases like "the farm pony." Limited narration is essentially the focus character's thoughts, so this implies that Twilight chooses to refer to AJ as "the farm pony." That just doesn't ring true. People don't think of acquaintances in such formal, external terms. In your own head, do you refer to your best friend as "the person"? Or if omniscient is what you did want, then make sure you're not having the narrator express opinions as if his own (attribute opinions to the characters) or taking a conversational style (asking questions, trailing off, adding emphasis, etc.).

>Fluttershy truly was curious about Mystical Mask's daughter//

Why are you referring to her like that? You've only called her Mage Meadowbrook or some manner of LUS.

>“He's real?”//

When a word is italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include a question mark or exclamation mark on it in the italics.

>forced my friends and I//

That's actually a spot for "me." Take the friends out: "forced I." Doesn't sound right, does it?

>back. It's horrible to look back//

Watch the close word repetition.

>siren's magic//

There were three, so use a plural possessive.

>counter spell//

Make that one word, or possibly hyphenate it.

>Are you asking me to be your pupil?//

But Meadowbrook specifically said "filly." Seemed like she was looking for a child. It's a bit of a leap for Fluttershy to assume Meadowbrook meant her.

>remembering some of the things Starlight had done to her and her friends in the past//

There are lots of little phrases you like to put in along these lines throughout, but they're not very effective. There are two reasons why. First, it's similar to spelling out emotions. You've probably heard of "show, don't tell" before, where it's usually better to demonstrate emotion than to have the narrator state it outright. It can also be distancing to explain character motivations and intentions. The second thing is that this statement carries no power. I have no idea what these memories are or what they mean to her. It's harder to do this kind of thing in an omniscient narration, since they like to take on a more personal voice, but a couple of examples will always speak louder than a cold, vague summary. Give me a sentence or two each about a couple of these memories. That brings it alive. Then I get engaged with the character and her feelings on the matter. Just leaving it that she had memories is a fact that does nothing to make me empathize with her.

>“If it'll make you happy, then yes, I'd love to.”//

This is a weird sentiment. The first part makes it sound like she's not interested and is playing along to humor her. If she'd really love to, then why qualify it like that?

>Hearths Warming//

Missing apostrophe.

>Had it been his idea, or had Twilight fallen asleep on her own? Oh well, it wasn't that important to the story.//

Here, you're taking a very limited feel to the narration again. You're predominantly using omniscient, but there are the occasional slips like this.

This chapter is extremely dialogue heavy. I don't get a good sense of what the setting is and if that guard is still standing there listening to him. It also tends to make the conversation a little sterile. There aren't the kinds of emotional cues that back up the mood of what they're saying. Remember, a significant part of a conversation is nonverbal. Don't neglect it.

>Ponies marveled at the ancient legend brought to life.//

I guess I'm surprised they'd recognize her unprompted. Has news of their return spread widely?

>when she spied the familiar rooftop in the distance//

>I see the rooftop of my boutique//
These are redundant.

>“Aww,” chorused the followers//

>“Ooooh,” the ponies chorused.//
Repetitive speech tag so close together.

>yet another pony was monopolizing her special time with Mistmane//

This is sudden. Sassy's barely spoken so far.

I'm now 4 chapters in, and I don't see a coherent story. It's just episodes of a Pillar talking an Element through a very low-stakes conflict that's easily solved, and there's no connection between chapters, other than the characters are already linked, but there's nothing in the story doing so. It's felt like I've read 4 separate short stories, not 4 chapters of a long story.

>your highness//

You'll typically capitalize honorifics like this.

>If his canter could do that, how disruptive must his gallop be?//

You're lapsing into a limited narration here. Take this with the earlier:
>the princess//
If you're truly using a limited narration, then this implies Celestia chooses to call herself "the princess," which is oddly formal. This is also very much from her point of view:
>appearing uncomfortable//

Why is Celestia laughing about Stygian on coffee? Does she know him? If so, we don't have any evidence of that.

>coffee?//

Keep the question mark inside the italics.

>Oh, Harmony//

Strange that he'd use that as an expression, because they didn't in the past, and when the modern ponies said things like "Tree of Harmony," the Pillars didn't understand. he'd know what it meant now, but it wouldn't have worked its way into his everyday usage.

>ponies who only knew Luna and I//

Same deal as before: use "me" here.

>If anything, he seemed to be under-reporting the horrors he'd witnessed in battle.//

Into Celestia's viewpoint again.

>protect . . .//

The best argument I can make for not putting spaces between the dots of an ellipsis is that FiMFic's typesetting doesn't recognize it as a single entity, so the spaces are fair game for line breaks. On my browser, two dots ended up on the next line.

>You guys are so proud of yourselves, like it's some kind of accomplishment that hair grows out of your face.//

But... she has hair covering her face as well. I get what you mean, but for an animal with a coat, it's not quite the same sentiment.

This chapter finally seems to have some lasting plot to it, but it doesn't really tie into any of the others, except for Stygian being around the castle.

>Daring Do didn't want to let Somnambula in on her secret identity.//

This is pretty obvious from thir behavior. Don't over-explain it to the audience.

>I've heard some unbelievable stories from Daring Do//

But this is Daring Do saying it, right? I don't understand. It's not like they really need to keep up this charade for Somnambula's benefit. She hasn't read the books, so she'd have no idea what they were doing.

>him,” - here she curved her forelock into a horn shape to illustrate - “but//

>Ages'” - she made hoof quotes - “is//
You have hyphens here where you need dashes.

>ghost aren't//

Mixing plural and singular.

>“Okay. What?”//

Include the question mark in the italics.

>“You were in Somnambula – the town – when Dr. Caballeron was causing trouble, right?”//

Why wouldn't she already know this?

>few seconds head start//

seconds'

>“I'm s-”//

Use a dash.

>the Map wanted you and the other Elements to bring us back for a reason//

Huh? The map didn't direct them there. Twilight undertook that on her own. The only thing the map did was help them find spots of dark energy and direct them to help Stygian, both after the Pillars had already returned.

>“It's like Rocky says – there's a reason they decided to keep me around.”

>
>“I'll say,” said Dash with a laugh.//
That's three forms of "say" close together.

>If he lost his balance and fell, he'd certainly be the heaviest pony she'd saved from falling from a dangerous height, although not the first.//

Drifting into the feel of a limited narrator again.

>lass//

>Ja//
Wait, so is he Scottish or Swedish? Or that Dreamworks/Disney brand of Viking that has a Scottish accent for some reason?

>She would have stumbled over the word if she had not spent an hour in the library with Twilight and Star Swirl earlier in the day.//

Because that specific word came up, or because spending time in the library just makes her generally smarter?

>at edge of our property//

Missing word.

>adding her own opinion//

That's just obvious. You don't need to narrate it.

>But I forgive you if you forgive me.//

Interesting she's making that conditional. It didn't seem like she was at first, and it runs contrary to what she said to him.

>the affects are unpredictable//

Effects. As a noun, "affect" means something like a tic, not a result.

>Stygian sipped from his cup again.//

He's doing that a lot. There's a disease readers catch where they can't think of anything more for a character to do with a beverage than some variation on "take another sip." Think of the things you'd do with your coffee while talking to a friend besides drinking it, then work some of that in.

>but yet//

Redundant.

>He took a drink of coffee///

And you're still at it...

After a couple of chapters of feeling like the story was going somewhere, it's lapsed back into the pattern of a Pillar having a low-stakes discussion with a show regular. That's really how the entire story feels so far, with the exception of the plot point about revamping the military. It's like those stories where it's practically obligatory that it visit each of the Mane 6. Everyone's paired up here, and we go through a somewhat philosophical discussion that ultimately doesn't resolve anything or even create tension to be resolved later. And so many of the chapters have no dependence on each other. As I said earlier, this feels like reading a series of quasi-related stories, not a single one with an overarching plot.

In fact, the story really isn't delivering on what the synopsis promises. The fix for that is probably revising the synopsis, though honestly, what it describes sounds more interesting than what's actually there. It's implied that the Pillars will have trouble fitting in to modern society, and that many apologues are owed. The item about Meadowvrook does come to fruition, but also note that the synopsis focuses on her and Star Swirl.

Of course, it's enirely possible (even likely, I'd say) that we'll get to some more compelling plot points in future chapters, but you're asking readers to go through an awful lot to get there.

Do the Pillars have some kind of unified plan, or are they just wandering around aimlessly trying to find things to do? I get the impression it's more of the latter, but that makes for less of a coherent story. I think it'd help if you established an organized plan for what these characters want to do and that they're on the same page about it, and then make that clear from the earlier chapters. Without any sort of overall purpose, the result is a directionlessness that doesn't keep me wanting to see what happens in the next chapter. The more of an impetus you can give events, the better off you'll be. What they want currently is a set of very broad things that are unlikely to get underway by the time the story concludes, and they're also things for which there's no real conflict or struggle to attain.

We don't know what kind of opposition Flash and Rockhoof will face in increasing the military, Somnambula and Star Swirl are pretty vague in what they actually want, and Mistmane and Meadowbrook seem more interested in surveying the magic school and evaluating the present state of magic than actually achieving something.

Aside from that, there are these detailed mechanical and stylistic things, but the only one I want to emphasize is the perspective. It seems like you want to use an omniscient narrator, but then you have to keep the narration from slipping into taking on any character's persona. There are numerous places where it did that and transitioned into a limited feel. You don't want the narrative voice wavering like that. Or if you intended to use limited, be careful the narration is always focused on saying only what the current perspective character could know or perceive (until you get used to the effect, it's better to keep to one perspective per scene), sounds how that character might phrase things, and doesn't revert to sounding neutral and formal for long stretches, which makes it lapse back into sounding omniscient.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3068

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>so why was it so hard to find the words.//

Isn't this a question?

>mention- her respect//

Not sure why this warrants a dash, but please use a proper one.

>She took the picture of her and Pinkie Pie off the wall making her way to her bed.//

This sounds jumbled. It seems to say the picture is of Pinkie making her way to bed. Or the wall is going to bed.

>picture- as//

Yes, please use proper dashes, either an em dash with no space on either side or an en dash with space on both sides.

>I actually wanted to ask if want to come with.//

Missing word and repetitive use of "want."

>The alicorn inspected the room with joyful curiosity. She frowned when she saw something underneath the covers of Starlight's bed.//

I get that Starlight's not in the room to witness this, but does that really warratn changing perspective? Is this stuff important? If so, can you stay with Starlight and have her notice evidence of it? Or if it really is necessary, can you have a smoother transfer of perspective?

>t was a journal//

Typo.

>But she had already read the last entry before she realized it.//

This is really contrived. She knew it was a journal and inadvertently read it? That's really hard to believe.

>So....//

You have several four-dot ellipses. They should be only three.

>This was her teacher and usually the situation was reversed.//

And now you've popped back to Starlight's viewpoint.

>I just flipped to last entry//

Missing word.

>"Years ago," She stated//

Don't capitalize the speech tag.

>mane. "but//

You have a period, so this starts a new sentence. Capitalize it.

>where we're differ//

"where we differ" or "where we're different."

>"...You're right." Twilight grinned boastfully.//

For several paragraphs around here, you're disorganized. You consitently have one character's speech in the same paragraph as the other's narrated actions, and it gets confusing as to who's speaking.

>And if there's something Pinkie//

Seems like you're missing a word here.

>dragged her to barn//

Missing word.

>she would never try and hurt you, or do anything to hurt you//

That says the same thing twice.

>Put your heart in Starlight.//

>She'll say yes Starlight.//
Missing a comma for direct address.

>He's the guest bedroom//

>Trixie sarcastically//
Missing word.

>"I don't know what to do." She said//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>she won't full on reject you. And least not fully.//

She's saying the same thing twice.

>"Well, for instance," she paused in the road//

You're using a non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>But, you weren't going to tell me.//

No reason to have that comma. They don't normally go after conjunctions.

>I'm took a guess//

Typo.

>Not just to be advice.//

The syntax is off here.

>She was please//

Typo.

>it eventually lead to an entrance//

The past tense is "led."

>Starlight practically felt a hole being born in her chest.//

I have to think you meant "bored."

>Starlight lifted the cup to her lips, it tasted like a strange combination of lemons and grape.//

Comma splice.

>Starlight think she saw//

Verb form is wrong.

>first one i went to//

Capitalization.

>the post office closes at Midnight//

Why is that capitalized? And why is the post office open so late?

>some pony//

One word, same as "somebody."

>hr//

>Slowing marching up the stairs//
>Her gaze sudden turned serious.//
Typo.

>The beautiful flowers of the night rushed over the daylight ones.//

I have no idea what this means. There's no context for it.

>A good night sleep//

A good night's sleep

>Scribbling down the words, she quickly jumped under the covers//

Participial phrases mean things happen at the same time, so she's writing while jumping in bed.

>else where//

elsewhere

>placed the small piece of parchment her saddlebag//

Missing word.

>He held a small blanket and a candle.//

This is the third sentence in a row with a "small" in it.

>hourse 'till Midnight//

Typo, capitalization, and spelling it "till" doesn't use an apostrophe.

>I know it isn't a big sentence, or huge reveal.//

Looks like the bold font got cut off before the end of the letter.

>the pinkie pony//

Typo.

>neat envelope, with various stickers on it. Her name was written neatly//

Repetition of "neat."

>It was "sent in" last minute//

When you have a quote inside another quote, use single quotation marks for the inner one.

The biggest issue here is that I still don't know what made Starlight fall in love with Pinkie. As much time as the story spends exhorting her to think about it and express that to her, she never really speaks of it to anyone, and when she finally puts it into writing, it's still very vague. She likes Pinkie's mane and smile, and she's happy Pinkie treated her well during her reformation. That's all very generic and not much to build a relationship on. What about her makes Starlight think they'd be compatible? How did she gradually come to find Pinkie endearing? I could go on at length, but instead, I'll refer you to Aragon. He's made a series of blog posts on how to do realistic and plausible shipping, and they're linked off his home page.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3069

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the normally blizzarding frozen north of the Crystal Empire//

But the Crystal Heart keeps the blizzard out. Wouldn't she be able to see the moon? Or is she outside the city's border?

>whenever I would come here. I needed a good prodding to come up here//

Try to avoid close repetition of words and phrases like this.

Right away, I'm noticing quite a lot of "to be" verbs. Mostly, you use "was," but it doesn't really matter which form. They're stagnant verbs and tend to make a story's action stagnate. I did a Ctrl-f for "was," and the screen lit up. Let me pull out an example to illustrate.
>I was thankful for my friend, former mentor and faithful confidant, Twilight Sparkle, for convincing me to make the trip up to the Crystal Empire for New Year’s.//
If I replace the "was" or just rephrase it to avoid having a verb there at all, it takes on a more active feel, which is more interesting to read. Try something like this:
>Fortunately my friend, former mentor and faithful confidant, Twilight Sparkle, had convinced me to make the trip up to the Crystal Empire for New Year’s.//

Here's another:
>Truthfully, anxiety was still an undercurrent in my mind//
becomes:
>Truthfully, anxiety had still clouded my thoughts//

It's impractical to completely avoid "to be" verbs, and you get more leeway for dialogue, since real people don't creatively avoid them when they speak, but using active verbs where possible in the narration will make for a more engaging read.

>I was curious about Twilight’s recent research with Sunburst as the sole reason.//

I don't understand what this is saying.

>Let me break the fourth wall, talk directly to my audience and tell you that your guess is as good as mine.//

Don't do this. You're now explicitly saying Starlight has an audience. Who is that audience? Is someone standing there listening to her tell the story? Is she writing all this down? Whatever the case, if you imply or outright state an audience, you need to define them. Why does she want them to hear it? Why do they want to listen? That's a can of worms best avoided unless you're prepared to deal with all that.

>“What a perfect New Year’s Eve,” Sunburst was the first of us to speak//

When you transition from speech to narration with a comma like that, the narrative bit needs to be a speech tag, but that's not how this is phrased.

>off-white stripe going down his muzzle//

I wonder if, being a pony, she'd know the proper terminology for that. For the width of it, it's be called a blaze.

>his voice trailed off//

You ended his speech with an ellipsis, which already means he trailed off. It's redundant to narrate that as well.

>I reply//

Why are you switching to present tense?

>and…” Sunburst trailed off//

Redundant again.

>“But there’s already—” Sunburst tried to protest, but was cut off by my excited smile.//

Two things to say about this. First, this is similar to the trailing off. The dash already means he got cut off, so you don't need to narrate it as well. Second, when you have an interruption, what comes immediately after it needs to be what does the interrupting. The fact that the narrator has time to wedge in the "Sunburst tried to protest" makes it seem less sudden. Do something like this:
>“But there’s already—” My excited smile silenced him.//

>civilians//

That's a strange word choice, as it implies the story focuses on non-civilians, civilians are in the minority, or Starlight herself isn't a civilian. I wonder if you meant citizen.

>in bedazzlement and awe//

Try to avoid directly naming emotions like this. You've been pretty good about presenting behavior and body language as evidence instead of just saying how characters feel, but be especially aware of using these "in/of/with emotion" phrases. Better to demonstrate that through what these characters are doing. It makes things more vivid.

>with,” I answered the question he wanted to ask.//

If that had just said "I answered," it'd be a valid speech tag, but as you've phrased it, that narrative piece should be a separate sentence.

A word about your choice of speaking verbs. You have to find some moderation. Yes, "said" is pretty unremarkable, but it also blends it. The reader doesn't really see it there, and the speech stands out. It's fine to have some more unusual speaking verbs for variety, but don't go overboard. They're okay when they change how the reader interprets or hears the speech, but if you go overboard with fancy ones, they steal attention from the dialogue.

>“Because of you, it’s going to be a good year,”//

Missing a line break here.

I have to say, this was far better written than a lot of what we get, never mind that it's your first one. I think it's on track to where we could post it with a little work. So have a look through what I've said and fix these things up. Then there's one more thing. The romance itself is very superficial.

If you love somebody, there will be lots of reasons why. I never learn why either of these characters think the other would be good relationship material. As far as I can tell, it's just because they knew each other since childhood. But what does Starlight actually like about him? What qualities does he have that she admires? What does Sunburst say to indicate the same about Starlight?

Actually, let me go on a brief tangent. You did a good job at staying in Starlight's perspective. Lots of authors have trouble with that, and they wander over to Sunburst's head to let me know what he's thinking about all this. You didn't do that. You kept steady in showing everything through Starlight's perception. And that's why I made the distinction of Suburst saying what he liked about her. She can't read his mind, after all, so the only way she'd know is if he said it.

But back to the romance. You have to prove to me that these two are in love, not just expect me to take your word for it. So part of that is taking me through Starlight's thoughts about him, so she can say what she likes about him. Anecdote can be a powerful thing here. So instead of just saying she thinks he's smart, give me a few sentences about a time she saw that on display and found it endearing. Then do that for a few other of his qualities as well, and you'll have all this evidence for why she loves him. That's how to build it up.

Also consider that a relationship is a give and take. Not only should she be thinking about what she'd get out of dating him but what she would contribute. What does she think he's going to get out of it?

I could go on at length, but fortunately, someone's already done the legwork. There's a user on the site called Aragon. If you go to his home page, you'll see that he's linked to a series of blog posts about writing romance. It's worth a read. (And he's a good author, so while you're there, his stories are worth a read, too.)

So you've got an excellent start here. You're already ahead of the curve. Just add that context to justify the romance and take into account the other comments I've made, and you could get this fixed up to where I'd be happy to post it. Because hey specifically apply to things I saw in the story, you might want to read some of the sections at the top of this thread, namely the ones about dialogue punctuation/capitalization, show versus tell, and saidisms.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3070

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Rainbow Dash and Rarity head east//

I thought when Rainbow Dash headed east, it took millions of words. Sorry, couldn't resist.

>, love, it’s//

If this formatting means something, it's lost on me.

That opening paragraph just comes across as inconsistent. First off, Dash is not a poetic character. To that end, I could buy the uneven rhythms and stretched rhymes. Yet it's so almost regular that it doesn't feel haphazard. It feels more like something planned, a speech that Dash had worked on for some time but not perfected yet, and the word choice is rather advanced for her in places. In fact, the near-structure of it seems to be fighting the whole theme of the piece.

In short, it doesn't say "Rainbow Dash" to me, nor does it create the tone that follows through the rest of the story.

>If is that one?//

Wording got jumbled here.

>just--hanging//

I don't understand why you're putting a dash here. There isn't a change in the train of thought, and nothing interrupts her.

>Dash felt Rarity take her hoof. She tucked a loose part of her curly mane behind her ear//

The first part sure makes it sound like Dash isn't looking at her, so how would she see the second part?

>She pondered how to open up without opening up all at once, which from her years of experience with her neurotic friends tended to look pretty bad.//

Again, this just doesn't evoke Dash for me. Compare it to her dialogue. The two should sound very similar. A limited narration is essentially the character's internal stream of thought, and if it sounds much different than what they say out loud, there would need to be a rationale for why (like an informal thought pattern against formal speech because she's in a ritzy venue, for instance).

>cartfull//

cartful

>cried out as her tongue burned//

Go back to the notion that the narration is Dash's stream of thought. She says this so matter-of-factly. If you did this, you'd probably have some choice words running through your head, but she just glosses over it. If it were to create the sense she barely noticed, I could buy that, but then she wouldn't be crying out. When she doesn't pay attention to the right things, it loses some authenticity.

>locked inside Carousel Boutique preparing//

Why do they need it to be locked?

>Dash laid on her friend’s plush bed//

Lay/lie confusion.

>Pegasi could feel and manipulate the energy in it like a unicorn could a leyline.//

This seems to contradict her earlier statement that the pegasi who'd modified it had done so in ways few of them understood.

>ripping across the sky//

You repeat this phrase in consecutive sentences.

>Dash would fly.//

I get why she'd like to fly, but it feels like you're skipping over something, namely the pluses and minuses of traveling together. I'm not even sure if Dash would count the companionship as a plus or minus at this point, and that's a rather telling thing.

>it’s a moment of piece//

I don't know if you're doing deliberate wordplay here or this is a typo. If the former, I'm not sure what it means.

>below her//

>beneath her//
Kind of repetitive to end consecutive sentences this way.

>facefull//

facceful

>If Dash had paid enough enough attention to that lesson, she might have come to the conclusion that since the jetstream was essentially one giant column of air being vibrated by unbound magical forces, it was only logical for it to produce sound as the overtones interacted in the space around her.//

Well... you're using a limited narrator. So this is Dash's stream of thought. It explicitly does occur to her if the narrator says it. There are ways to say things to this effect, but they're usually phrased more like she would have been satisfied with that conclusion were she more scientific, or some such. This sounds more like she's saying she lacks the knowledge to reason out the explanation she just reasoned out, which is contradictory.

>carrying over the wind in fifths and fourths and major thirds//

Look, I know you in particular can't help letting this kind of thing creep into the writing, but once again, this is Dash's limited narration. This means that she not only knows what these things are but so instinctively that she can recognize them when they're not where her attention would be focused. Don't lose an authentic train of thought for the character, or else you might as well be writing omniscient.

>a trail of condensation clinging to her like the tail of a comet//

I guess it depends on what the source is? Only condensation from a combusting propulsion source would trail behind, and she doesn't have one. If you're talking about the vapor clouds that form when objects approach the speed of sound (presumably, exiting the jetstream means she's suddenly going much faster relative to the air around her), then those would be more around her head and wings.

Wait, let me revisit that. She shut her wings, and there's suddenly a downward force on her. It's just gravity, so nothing more than she's used to. There's not going to be an aerodynamic force pushing her down just from that.

>again, light blue suited her. Another thought overtook her, and she rolled again//

Watch the close word repetition.

>Dash, pumped her wings hard//

Why is that comma there?

>emblazoned with the San Diamingo flag//

Kinda makes me wonder what it looks like...

>over the mountain,” the pony explained over//

Watch the close repetition.

>There are essentially two towns on either side of the island.//

This makes it sound like there are four towns total, two on each side.

>What kind of food to they have?//

Typo.

>lulled them into silence//

It's kind of presumptive for Dash to assume this is what's happening with the staff member. She can only speak for herself, unless she's drawing a conclusion from her observation of his behavior.

>above, she spotted a pair of pegasi riding a thermal updraft into the clouds above//

Close repetition.

>Thanks for the lift dude.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>in the background, dramatic music playing in the background//

Close phrase repetition.

>all bursting out all//

Close repetition.

>coy!--“No,”//

Here's a danger of using a double hyphen over a real dash: you can't control the typesetting on FiMFic. On my browser, it's put a line break between the hyphens.

>led her down the single dirt road leading//

Repetitive word choice.

>then back to cabin//

Missing word.

>You could have gotten sunburned//

Do ponies get sunburned? I know only certain animals can.

>Much to her friend’s chagrin//

Why would Dash refer to herself in such a roundabout way?

>down into deep//

Seems like you're missing a word.

>Dash laid in a soft bed //

Lay/lie confusion.

>how do you propose I make it down in time for the spa appointment.//

Isn't that a question?

>the pegasus//

So I guess you've tranferred over to Rarity's viewpoint. It doesn't go back for the rest of the chapter, so it's not bad, though I'm not sure it's adding anything either. But once again, this is a very impersonal kind of reference to make about someone she knows well.

>if you want to look presentable when we got to the resort club//

That "got" doesn't parse.

>cognitive dissonance//

You've done a better job since the early chapters of keeping Dash's narration from sounding too advanced, but there are occasional spots like this. You have her not knowing what spelunking is and thinking they'd have a log flume ride coming down the mountain (Is it really a mountain, though? There's a minimum elevation requirement to call it that.) despite no evidence of such, and yet she both knows what cognitive dissonance is and is inclined to use the phrase.

>That vague notion seemed familiar, but it was equally easy to dismiss.//

And you're getting a bit advanced with her again.

>The jetstream roared above her, no more than a few hundred years away.//

Typo.

>to find Dash zonked out on a folding chair. It felt strange to find her//

Watch the repetitive phrasing. And it's curious for you to switch to Rarity's perspective here. The whole story's been with Rainbow Dash so far. Is it really buying you anything to go to Rarity? We don't learn anything important while there, and it only lasts a few paragraphs. You could easily cut it without losing anything, or have this be something Dash observes while pretending to be asleep.

>Having already made the important decision to stay in bed until the tides washed the island away, her resolve was strong.//

This makes it sound like it was her resolve that had made the decision.

>ice cold bottle//

ice-cold

>The poor pegasus//

Why would Dash refer to herself so externally? Nobody does this.

>Without taking her eyes off of Rarity, Dash eyed the paper bags sitting on the floor//

This is self-contradictory.

>Dash nervously peered into the bag and pulled out its contents. “Is that... Prench?”//

I don't understand this on two levels. First, Rarity had put the cold bottle against Dash's neck, so when did it go back into the bag, which may not even be that close to Rarity? And second, Dash already said it was a champagne bottle, so why did she need to look into the bag to see that's what it was? She's the narrator. If the narration says it's champagne, then Dash knows it's champagne.

>“What’s that, some kind of protein shake?” Dash grimaced at the thought.//

I guess I'm a little surprised that someone athletic like Dash would hate protein shakes, but it's not impossible.

>toast, “The//

Capitalization.

>And it’s why I love you so much that, uhm, I want to know if you’re happy.//

Okay, nothing in the story so far has made me think they were already in a relationship. Rarity doesn't react with any degree of surprise, so either they are, Rarity's long since figured this out, or Rarity's just taking this as a platonic statement. And this is good! Rarity's hard to figure out here, and it keeps things interesting.

>everything’s confusing//

Capitalization.

>leaning on a stood//

Typo.

>The chords sounded funny//

This goes back to narrative voice again. Remember, this is the same limited narration you had identifying fifths and fourths and major thirds, and now she can only say something vague (which fits her character better anyway).

>More chords floated past them.//

Why do you keep just calling the music chords? Whether or not Dash has any musical knowledge, she's going to describe it in more ways than that.

>whatever,” Rarity said, “It’s//

Capitalization. When you re-enter the quote like this, it doesn't get capitalized.

>by the time she touching down again//

Syntax is off.

>with the incredible roar of the wind passed around her//

Weird phrasing. Maybe you meant that "with" to be a "while"?

>All that was left with the night.//

This might be okay, but it kind of sounds like another "with" you meant to be something else.

>ocean stretched on endlessly beneath her. The island was a tiny speck in the endless ocean//

Pretty repetitive phrasing.

>Using the jetstream to retrace her flight path//

How's that work? Presumably she's not in it, so she's just below it or something? How can she sense it there in the dark? Seems like this would be a great place for some sensory imagery instead of glossing it over.

>The island appeared on the horizon//

But she mentioned it being a speck before. That sure made it sound like she still had it in sight.

Man, this is a really hard kind of story to judge. It's got lovely atmosphere and characterization, and on the balance that can outweigh some missteps. The biggest is that the narration is inconsistent at feeling like it's Dash's voice. It's too sophisticated at times, and then there are the big poetic paragraphs. Because of the narrator you're using, it's Dash coming up with that stuff on the spur of the moment. On the one hand, that makes it more reasonable that the rhymes aren't very clean most of the time, but on the other, it means Dash is both able and inclined to think in poetry off the cuff, and that's tougher to believe.

So I'll say this: Fix up the typos and mechanical errors and such. I'm prepared to take the poetry as a conceit for the story. But you should really consider how out of place the two short diversions into Rarity's perspective are, and you should think about making the prose-style narration more in tune with Dash's character. It should reflect her intelligence level, vocabulary, mannerisms, and personality, and there were several places, mostly in the early chapters, where it fel like you were losing her voice. Again, if you want that fancy language, you could go for an omniscient narrator, since matching her voice wouldn't be an issue then, but that would be a far more extensive change to make than "dumbing down" some of the existing narration, as it were.

If all you fix is the mechanical/stylistic things, I'll post this, but as much as you want this to be an intensely personal experience for the readers, seeing through Dash's eyes, I hope you'll consider that it would be even more powerful if it more consistently emulated her. Mark it as "back from Mars," and I'll approve it when you resubmit.

Oh, and a word about cover art. You have a lot of followers, and this is a popular enough ship. I'm surprised it's gotten so few readers. I wonder if it isn't the art. If you really want to keep this, you can, but Seth always complains at us when we send him stories with stock images as cover art like this, since they look pretty boring on the blog. Even a nice episode screencap of Dash alone or with Rarity and looking mood-appropriate would make a noticeable difference.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3071

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>the road to school to the bus stop//

So which is it? I realize it could be both, but it's just confusing reading it this way. I'm not sure whether she's walking to school or the bus stop. Either way, this seems to say school is her destination, but the very next sentence talks about her going home, so I can't figure this out.

>as of billions of tiny little cotton balls had covered everything//

Typo.

Just in the first screenful, you have 12 instances of "was" or "wasn't." There are over 100 in the story. That's a lot for this word count. If I factor in other forms of "to be," then you're even more awash in them. It'd pay off for you to phrase things with active verbs where you can. "To be" is boring. Nothing happens. It's impractical to avoid it altogether, particularly in dialogue, since people don't creatively phrase things to get around it when they speak, so you get some leeway there. I'll pull out an example.
>Her bike was in the shop, so her only ride home was the local bus that ran by every fifteen minutes.//
If I rewrite this with active verbs, it could be something like this:
>The shop still hadn't finished fixing her bike, so she had no other way home except the local bus that ran by every fifteen minutes.//

>She also realized that because of the snow the bus would be late//

Why? Is the road not plowed? Is the bus always late when it snows? I'd like to see her justification.

>Once she had reached school, she noticed one of two things.//

This says she only noticed one thing, but then you have her go on to notice both. Even if she only noticed one thing, this wouldn't work for the perspective. You're effectively using Sunset as your narrator, so if there's something she doesn't notice, the narrator can't notice it either.

>Not that the substitute cared, he was dozed off in Ms. Harshwhinny’s chair//

That's a comma splice, and the syntax is off for "he was dozed."

>low voiced//

Hyphenate multi-word descriptors like this when they come before what they're describing.

>She was the newest of the group therefore she shouldn't know either.//

Needs a comma.

>But she guessed that's what the hushed whispers were for, but it didn't seem to comfort her in the slightest.//

The two uses of "but" create the feel of a double negative. Plus Sunset should know whether she was comforted or not. "Seem" shouldn't enter into it. That'd be someone else's impression of her.

>twenty third//

Hyphenate.

>Shock overtook Sunset’s face, then confusion, then understanding.//

This is a bad idea in two ways. First, it's better to demonstrate how a character feels through their behavior, body language, and dialogue, instead of directly naming emotions. It's more realistic that way. Think about it: you don't know how some random person you see in public feels. There's not a narrator telling you. But you can observe them and figure out how they feel from how they act. That's how it works in real life. So when you have to figure out a written character the same way, it's more authentic.

And second, you're using Sunset as your viewpoint character. That means you also have to be careful exactly what things you use to give her emotion context. Only she could know what memories are running through her head, for example. A narrator in another character's viewpoint couldn't tell you what Sunset is thinking. Along those same lines, consider that Sunset can't see her own face to make the judgment you're having her do here.

>twenty first//

Hyphenate.

>what Sunset did know, was that she was going to be there for Applejack//

Why is this such a big thing for her? The other girls know AJ well, and they're not moving to do anything. Why not? Do they know AJ would just rather be alone? Have they tried in the past and nothing's worked? Seems like that's the kind of stuff Sunset should ask about before she unilaterally decides she's going to fix AJ.

>Losing a parent was hard//

This kind of begs the question of how Sunset feels about her own parents.

>Lunch time came around//

Why are we only halfway through the day? You already said "The rest of the day was a blur of classes" as if it's already over.

>Do you....//

>How'd....How'd//
Only three dots in an ellipsis. A four-dot one is a specific use case in formal nonfiction.

>I don't know dear//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>At a time like this, she really needs her friends.//

Then why have none of her friends ever done anything about it?

>the bell for the period to end rung//

rang

>When she arose from her bed//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

>today,” She said//

Capitalization. Dialogue tags don't get capitalized unless they start the sentence.

>up,” There was pity in her eyes.//

The narrative part here doesn't have a speaking action, so it can't be a dialogue tag. It needs to be a separate sentence, so end the dialogue with a period. Both of these dialogue mechanics issues persist throughout the story. I'm not going to mark any more, but that doesn't mean they aren't there.

>the older woman//

AJ is your perspective character now, so you're saying she chooses to refer to her own grandmother like this. In your own thoughts, would you call your grandmother this?

>turnin’.” She turned//

Watch close word repetition like this.

>Seeing how nothing she said was going to get though her stubborn granddaughter’s head, Granny Smith decided to let it go.//

Why are you jumping over to Granny Smith's perspective for a single paragraph? Stay in AJ's head.

>Applejack didn't even bother to shower, she just threw on her work clothes and headed out.//

Comma splice.

>blanketing it in white//

Most times, you'll set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>It was quiet, most mornings were.//

Comma splice, and you have a close repetition of "most" in the next sentence.

>Apple Bloom hated getting up this early, it was the bane of her existence.//

I'm seeing a lot more of these comma splices lately. I'm going to have to stop marking them.

>I wasn't even old enough to talk to them. I don't even remember what Momma looks like and it hurts Applejack! It hurts!//

This'll take a bit more explanation to get into. If Apple Bloom never knew them, then why does she have such an attachment to them? THis is a very over-the-top reaction. She'd love them just by the fact they're her parents, but she didn't have a reason for so personal a relationship with them, so give me more about why this matters so much to her.

>I was four, remember?//

She just said she wasn't old enough to talk to them before they died. A four-year-old can't talk?

>Apple Bloom you can't blame yourself//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>I’m the reason their dead//

Their/they're confusion.

>O-Okay//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>walking passed Applebloom//

Past/passed confusion; Apple Bloom.

>I miss my parents in Equestria//

Ah, there we go. But as relevant as this is to identifying with AJ, she barely touches on it. This is the only mention it ever gets.

>The usually kept girl//

Something's off in that phrasing.

>she had went//

gone

>Oh, Okay//

Why is "okay" capitalized?

>Sunset hadn’t been friend with,//

Friends, and that comma is unnecessary.

>bit bile//

Missing word.

>confused and not sure what made her friend leave so abruptly//

Don't jump over to AJ's perspective like this.

>ya’ll//

y’all

>‘round//

When you have an apostrophe on the front of a word, be aware that smart quotes will turn it backward. You can paste one in th right way or type two in a row, then delete the first.

>recognized the immediately song//

Syntax is off.

>years...” her voice trailed//

The ellipsis already means she's trailing off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>youngin’//

young ’un

It sure doesn't end up taking much convincing to get Apple Bloom to give up her guilt. Part of the power in a story is the difficulty involved in achieving what the protagonist wants. This is all pretty straightforward. At least Apple Bloom doesn't come around when Applejack first spoke to her, but they just make the same argument to her twice, and the second time it works. Plus having everyone come over for dinner ended up not mattering to this. It had nothing to do with what Applejack said to her, so that leaves it feeling extraneous. Plus that's another example of a problem being fixed very easily. Everyone shows up, and Applejack's immediately in a good mood. They didn't have to work for it, so there's less of a payoff when they get the effect they want.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3089

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>A quiet chime sounded and the creature’s characteristics popped up in the lower left of her visor.//

You have a number of places like this that could use a comma between the clauses. When a conjunction separates two subjects that each get their own verb, you'll normally put a comma there. In this case, you have "chime sounded, and... characteristics popped up." Here's another spot a bit later wi the the same issue:
>Luckily she heard its skittering legs at the last second and she was able to throw up a personal shield in time.//
Assuming this is going to be a pervasive thing, I won't be able to mark them all, so give the story a scan for these.

>thirty three//

Hyphenate.

>according to her helmet’s heads-up-display//

Participial phrases like this normally get set off with a comma.

>take a step back to take//

Watch the close repetition of words or phrases like this.

>faster than light travel//

Whenever you have an entire phrase that acts as a single adjective in front of what it describes, hyphenate it. So, "faster-than-light travel." The exception is if there's a two-word phrase starting with an -ly adverb. Those don't use hyphens.

>it more closely resembled a gangly insect rather than a spacecraft capable of faster than light travel//

Now I'm going to revisit this sentence. This is narration, but it's expressing Twilight's opinion for her. Mostly, the narration has been pretty factual, but here, it's taking on Twilight's viewpoint. It could stand to be more consistent. Limited narrators essentially take on a character's identity, while omniscient ones are formal and factual for the most part. Your story has sounded mostly omniscient to this point, but some spots like this one sound limited. The problem is that I can't tell what you intend. If you want omniscient, then you can't let character opinion like this creep into the narration without explicitly saying is what that character thinks. Or if you want a limited narrator, then establish that more definitively from the start, and have it poke in with a subjective statement like this more often. The longer you go without something like this, the more it feels like omniscient narration with occasional perspective mistakes than a limited narration.

And here's another thing that doesn't work if you're using a limited narrator:
>The alicorn mare//
This would mean that Twilight is choosing to describe herself with such a phrase. People don't think of themselves in such formal, external ways. For omniscient, this kind of phrasing is fine, as long as you don't overuse it.

For that matter, if you want a limited narrator, then it's really not necessary to have so much italicized thought. The narration already is her thought, so let it express those for her. By making them quotes, you're forcing a distance between the character and reader that works against the point of using a limited narrator.

>Then I saw the fire….//

A four-dot ellipsis is really for quoted excerpts in formal nonfiction writing. It's possible to actually do that in fiction, like if you were showing a research paper Twilight had written, and she did something like that in the paper. But for trailing off, just use three dots.

>much needed//

Hyphenate.

>As the purple pony settled in the padded pilot’s seat, the canopy swung down and locked with a pneumatic hiss as the airtight seal pressurized.//

It's really clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence like this, plus they effectively over-specify the chronology.

>high pitched//

Hyphenate.

>at best, thirty light minutes away//

No reason to have a comma there.

>burnt out//

Hyphenate.

>excuses.” Twilight quipped//

Punctuation.

>Princess.” The voice boasted back//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>Regret maybe?//

If you've got a word italicized for emphasis, then include a question mark or exclamation mark on it in the italics.

>“Anyway,” Twilight decided to file that thought away to think about later, “I//

And this is the opposite problem. You have something punctuated/capitalized like a speech tag, but it has no speaking action. Add one in or make it a separate sentence.

>several thousand light year//

Hyphenate.

>it was nice to finally have somepony to talk to; especially one that knew her so well.//

A semicolon is really only correctly used if you could replace it by a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but what comes after it here couldn't. A comma would work fine. This is the only one I've marked, but most of your semicolons are misused.

>hideous!” His voice came in//

Capitalization.

>gut wrenching//

Hyphenate.

>“It wasn’t your f…” His voice cut out//

An ellipsis is for a gradual fade. If the voice cuts off suddenly, use a dash.

>Too bad I don’t have time to catalog everything. The mare thought with some indignation.//

You're really intermittent at getting this kind of punctuation/capitalization issue wrong, so I can't tell whether you're making careless errors or don't understand the rules. There's a short section on dialogue capitalization/punctuation at the top of this thread.

>two hundred and sixty//

Someone as scientific as she is should know it's improper to use "and" in a number like this.

>the recording, along with any information she had gathered since her last data drop//

You need to pair that comma with another at the end of this descriptive aside.

>The three that her scanner failed to pick up anything//

Syntax is off here.

>Whatever monster created the life forms within//

It's starting to get stretched very thin that I have no idea what's going on. In a novel-length story, it's easier to put off something for thousands of words, because that's only a small portion of the whole thing, but when I'm closing in on 20% of the way through, and I don't have the first clue 1) what made Twilight run away, 2) why they want her to come back, and 3) whatever you're talking about in this sentence, then you're stringing the reader along too far. There is one exception to this, but it's not one you're using: that the limited narration can't address any of this because it's so abhorrent or traumatic to her that she forces the thoughts away before she can dwell on them. She's been given no motivation to do so.

By the end of chapter 1, I didn't know what the story's central conflict was supposed to be. There was just some banal interaction with an alien life form, then a mild but vague confrontation with another pony. I asked myself then whether it was okay prolonging even identifying the conflict this long, and I decided that it sometimes takes novels several chapters do to this, but now that I'm well into chapter 2, it's getting to be too much. Either let the reader know what the conflict is sooner or give Twilight some plausible reason why she refuses to even think about it, as well as demonstrating her having to fight off such thoughts.

>her conscious overruled her//

conscience

>Depressing the acceleration bars of her control yoke, her vessel’s pulse drive kicked on//

This says that her vessel's pulse drive depressed the acceleration bars.

>gentle decent//

descent

>sunward facing//

Hyphenate.

>flattened mesa//

As opposed to... an unflattened mesa?

>drew her ire attention//

It feels like there's a word missing here or something, but maybe it's just an expression I'm not familiar with.

>dark thoughts muddled her mind//

When you leave something so vague like this, it loses all meaning.

>sparks arching//

Usually sparks are described as "arcing," though what you have is possible, if unusual.

>burnt out//

Hyphenate.

>A cluster of thick crimson crystals//

Is this the plutonium? I don't know of any plutonium compounds having such a color, but if this comes straight from the game, then I suppose it's at least consistent with the source.

>her world turned to red//

Ah, so we finally have some drama. But it still does nothing to bring a sense of unity to the story or explain what's caused it all. What has the most forward momentum so far is wondering why the story's giving me the impression that all the evidence of intelligent life she's found are from the same source. There's only the most vague back story about why she's out here and what she wants to accomplish, so that part isn't compelling.

>ear splitting//

Hyphenate.

>Lined with flakes of ablative skin, they//

What's "they" here? The only candidate I can see is the flakes, but then this says the flakes are lined with flakes.

>peeked around her cover briefly, just long enough to take a peek//

Watch the close repetition.

>but every second she wasted, meant the sentinel grew closer//

No reason to have a comma there.

>an angry, computerized scream//

Is it alive? It kind of sounds odd for a computer to be angry or scream. What purpose would it serve?

>Violet eyes//

Once again, keep in mind you're using her as the perspective character for a limited narration. Why would she remark on her own eye color?

>the two flying sentinel’s//

Why is that a possessive?

>Her ears swiveled around and locked in on the whirling and buzzing//

Maybe you meant whirring?

>accelerate around next bend of the crevice//

Missing word.

I'm going to pull some examples out of the end of chapter 3 to make a point. Here are all the participial phrases you use in the last screenful:
>using her powerful hind legs to accelerate around next bend of the crevice//
>searing away the shadows//
>Galloping along the rocky floor//
>reminding the little pony that she was still being hunted//
>Flaring her wings wide//
>placing a hill between her and the sentinels//
>opening the canopy just in time to leap into it//
>Throwing her harness on//
>slowly trudging after her//
>Staring forward once more//
>letting her breathing fall to a more manageable level//
>already mulling over ideas on how to patch it//
That's over 5 paragraphs and 20 sentences. So you're averaging 2.4 per paragraph, or a little more than one every other sentence. That gets to be very structurally repetitive. The reader notices, albeit perhaps unconsciously, that he's seeing the same elements over and over again, and it feels repetitive. This is even more true the more unusual an element is, and participial phrases don't turn up much in everyday speech, so they stand out easier. The same is true of words. You wouldn't blink at seeing "the" 4 times in a single sentence, but you'd remember seeing "ventriloquist" twice on an entire page. So just watch for getting in a rut with these.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3090

>>3089
>newton meters//
Torque units are usually hyphenated.

>Hyperdrive//

Why is this capitalized? Is it a trademark or something?

>deep space fighters//

deep-space

>showing the Equestrian fighters angle towards her//

The verb form here should be "angling," unless you mean that to be a noun, in which case, "fighters" needs to be possessive.

>“I was hoping.” The Equestrian captain answered//

Capitalization/punctuation.

>one way//

Hyphenate.

>She was the furthest pony from Equestria//

There are other ponies in the same system. She will be when she warps again, but for now? If this is true, it's true by such a tiny margin that it may as well not be.

>twenty five//

Hyphenate.

>Guilt wracked her//

The previous paragraph already describes the circumstances of this. Don't be so blunt with her emotions as to state them outright. Focus on what thoughts and images go through her head (which you've already done) and how this makes her feel physically. But to those thoughts, even though you'v covered what they are, pay a little attention to tone. The narration is essentially her internal monologue, so think about not only what she'd say in her head but how. These are painful images, so she wouldn't be stating them stoically as if reading from a history book. You've got some word choice in there that's in the right direction, like acrid and devastation. These are not factual words, so they let her opinion creep in. That's good. But some of this might get painful enough that she can't complete a sentence, maybe she'd emphasize a word here and there. Basically, give it the inflections she might use if she spoke it out loud.

>the Equestrian pilot//

She knows his name, right? If so, why make such an impersonal reference?

>many more sights that brought a flood of memories to the forefront of her mind//

Another spot where it's way to nebulous. Just a one-sentence example or two of these memories will carry far more weight than leaving it as a bland generalization.

>Griffons, Yaks, and the Dragons//

Why would these be capitalized? She doesn't capitalize pony.

>Twilight Sparkle seemed lost for words//

To whom? She's essentially the narrator. She'd know whether she was at a loss for words. "Seem" wouldn't enter into it.

>a maelstrom of conflicting emotions swirled through her head//

You're doing that vagueness again.

>Twilight saw the explosion happen again, just like it did every time she dreamed of that day.//

See, she's not fighting the thought. She's letting herself see it. So why is the narrator withholding the identity of "he"? You're not setting this up to be plausible as to why she keeps skirting the issue.

>Its ponies like us//

Its/it's confusion.

>“But those families…” She began, only to be interrupted right away.//

Three things here. First, you have the same dialogue tag capitalization issue. Second, if she gets interrupted, she'd get cut off with a dash, not trail off with an ellipsis. And third, when someone gets cut off, the very next thing needs to be what cuts her off. The fact that the narration gets to wedge all that in there takes away the sense that the interruption is sudden and immediate. Just end the speech with a dash, remove that narration, and go right to his speech in the next paragraph.

>His words echoed across the void and they might have worked in the end but he would never know because she was already gone.//

This needs a couple of commas, and it's weird with the perspective. If she's gone, she wouldn't know any of this. It's like you're shifting to his perspective.

>learn her tactics and anticipate her actions//

Really, what are they going to do to her, though? They won't shoot her down, and unless she's somewhere out of her ship gathering resources (which she doesn't even need to do anymore), they couldn't capture her either. I don't get a sense of what the actual peril is.

>month long/

Hyphenate.

>duel levers//

This means they're for fights. You want "dual."

>worn out//

Hyphenate.

>Carefully setting down a crate of lustrous emril ore, the alicorn princess followed the sound back into her ship’s cockpit.//

I mentioned a while back that you use a lot of participial phrases. I haven't seen a cluster quite that extreme again, but there are a couple dangers of using them. One is that they imply synchronized action, so here, she's going back to the cockpit while she's setting the crate down. Whenever you use a participial phrase, make sure you actually intend the actions to be concurrent.

>a hostile scan; ever! The most they’ve ever done is a cursory scan//

I don't understand the difference. What makes a scan hostile?

>high pitched//

Hyphenate.

>Somepony was screaming and only when the attack had ended did she realize that it had been coming from herself.//

This is a very cliched thing.

>It represented the only safety she had but she knew she would never make it in time.//

This is pretty much the same dilemma she faced with the sentry bots. Does the game repeat like this?

>dizzyingly speeds//

You have an adverb where you need an adjective.

>The gangly insect-like spaceship//

I don't know how many times you need to describe it as such.

>a house-sized rock//

I don't get a sense for how much cover this provides. Some of the things she's done aboard the ship make it sound bigger than a house, so this wouldn't obscure her.

>now donut-shaped asteroid, where she could now//

Watch the close word repetition.

>the inevitability of her inescapable fate//

She just got finished saying the other Equestrians were only minutes behind when all this started. She seems to have conveniently forgotten.

>closed her eyes shut//

Redundant.

>Having reached the end of their short energetic lives, the Equestrians//

This makes it sound like the Equestrians reached the end of their lives.

>taxing their weapon’s heat dissipation systems//

That should be a plural possessive, assuming there's more than one weapon in the fleet.

>Hellish lights danced by her cockpit and out of the corner of her eye, she saw several of them slam into her fellow ponies’ shields.//

Comma splice.

>chance… Twilight’s thoughts trailed off//

The ellipsis already connotes trailing off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>One that was piloted by a friend.//

If he's a friend, why hasn't she named him in 6 chapters?

>Four million suns worth//

suns'

>I have run the numbers again and again. She reminded herself//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>a pony//

This makes it sound like she doesn't know who it is.

>damaged, yet un-breached//

You don't need that comma, but if you want it there, you need to pair it with another after this.

>small wave had just crashed, sending a torrent of frothy bubbles racing up the shore to be followed by a small//

Watch the close word repetition.

>downward spiraling//

Hyphenate.

>He asked almost more as an accusation, than a question.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>Did you find any friends? Did you find any allies? Did you find the peace you were looking for?//

I don't get his argument. She left so Equestria would have peace. He's not addressing whether it worked.

>they found a natural adversary, and.//

And what?

>lit by the ambient light//

Lit by light? Seems self-explanatory.

>Her own little science vessel only served as target practice to them//

She keeps denigrating the ship, but it's taken out quite a few enemies and survived. It's been ringing false for a while now. Not that she wants to seek out combat, but she keeps saying it's inadequate in a fight yet proving otherwise.

>Memories poured forth of their own accord. She saw her friends again, smiling at her, beckoning her.//

You're being needlessly vague again.

>coast line//

coastline

>a gentle decent//

descent

>Lifting a hoof, she gently ran it along the multi-tool’s smooth rounded surface.//

Another spot where a participle synchronizes actions that probably shouldn't be. You also need a comma between smooth and rounded.

>She had no more use for it anymore.//

The "no more" and "anymore" are redundant.

In the end, I'm unfamiliar with the game, so I don't know how much about this story was driven by it. For instance, why Twilight never reveals who the friend she rescues is. But again with that as an example, there are some things you can get away with in games that you can't in stories. It makes no sense from her perspective to keep his identity secret, unless you give her a reason to. Same with whatever villain she was referring to. It's still a little off-putting how far we go into the story before we know much about what's going on, but I gather the game is like that as well, so I can take that as being consistent, where it still works with what narration you've used.

Other perspective issues are her use of impersonal descriptors, particularly for herself, and the odd way you have so much quoted thought when the narration is already her thoughts. I can live with the latter, though consider how distancing it is to have the narrator become a middleman relaying quotes when it's supposed to be identically Twilight.

There's some mechanical clean-up needed as well, and I provided examples of all the kinds of problems I saw, though certainly not an exhaustive list of every instance, so take those examples and apply them throughout.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3097

>>3089

Thank you for pre-reading my story. I've read through your feedback, and I just wanted to respond to some of your notes and ask a question or two if you don’t mind.

First, I fully agree with all of your notes on my problems with mechanics. I'm actually a little embarrassed at some of the dumb mistakes I made. I’m sorry about that.

As for my issues with having consistent narration, I get why switching back and forth is an issue and I’ll work on rewriting parts of the story where this problem is evident. If I might ask, would you prefer a limited narrator or an omniscient narrator for this story?

Some parts of the story do reflect things in the game and I know they sound weird if you haven’t played it before. Examples include the hostile scan comment, how the different enemies act, the strange way plutonium is presented, and how the computers screech or scream.

With regard to your comments on the story, I see why there are issues with the main plot. One of the reasons why is in the game itself, the main character never has his/her backstory explained. He/she is only referred to as The Traveler in the game and no reason is given as to why he/she is trying to reach the galactic center. I wanted to leave the exact circumstances of what happened to Twilight as a mystery. Same with the identity of the pony who followed her. My intention was to parody the game and not delve into either backstory but I can understand why it didn’t work. I never intended this to be a long story in the first place and to be honest, I don’t have any canon background for either. Would this be a killing stroke to the story then?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3101

>>3097
I apologize for taking so long to respond. I sometimes forget to check this thread, as I don't get many responses anymore.

The idea with a crossover is that someone who knows nothing about the other material won't be lost. Oddly enough, it seems that people who are familiar with the game will also be lost, quite by design. So all that is to say that anything you've done to mirror what happens in the game (skimping on Twilight's back story, computers screaming, etc.) are fine. They'll hurt immersion for readers new to the game, and I don't think it would hurt the crossover nature to add that stuff, but no, you don't have to.

Between omniscient and limited narration, that's entirely up to you. There are strengths and weaknesses to both, and it'll come down more to what you're comfortable using or feel provides a better story. I think what you have is much closer to limited, so just from a standpoint of how much effort it'd take to make it all uniform, that's the easier route.

Omniscient tends to work better when you want broad overviews of events and want to be able to say what any character is thinking or what other thing is going on across the universe. But you'll normally want to keep such a narrator formal and factual. Limited can only portray what one character at a time knows and perceives. You can jump to multiple characters, but you shouldn't do so often or abruptly. It's best to keep to a single character per scene if possible.

Limited is usually the better choice when the story is focused on the experiences of a small number of characters or you want the reader to identify with one or two in particular, since a limited narration gives a much more intimate portrait of that character. But it's possible to do it either way.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3109

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

There are a few standard things like editing mistakes and close word repetition, but the biggest thing, and the one I'll discuss some, is that the perspective is really unsteady.

I'll begin at the beginning.

>Twilight Sparkle asked Spike for the umpteenth time//

"Umpteenth" is an opinion, so in the first sentence of narration in the story, you're already clearly using a limited narrator. That's fine. The only characters clearly present so far are Spike and Twilight, and this could reasonably represent either of their opinions, but I don't know whose yet.

>the princess//

Next sentence. This isn't something either one would reasonably use. Twilight wouldn't call herself that, and Spike knows her too well to use such an impersonal reference. You don't think about your friends or yourself in your own head as "the person," do you? It's just as poor a fit for a limited narration unless it's a reference they would reasonably use (like "her number one assistant" for Spike, as an example). So I still can't tell who holds the perspective, but it's leaning a little toward Spike.

>nervously wearing a groove into the platform//

"Nervously" is an opinion, so we're still definitely in a limited narration, and it's favoring Spike's viewpoint so far.

>The young dragon//

By the same token as "the princess," Spike wouldn't refer to himself as this, so you've seemingly drifted over to Twilight's viewpoint now.

>Despite his smile, his voice sounded as nervous as Twilight looked.//

Now I can't tell anymore. The comparison of his smile to his voice feels external to him, yet Twilight wouldn't know how she looked. She can't see herself, after all. You're just flicking around to perspectives all over the place.

>the concern in her friend's voice cutting through her inner excuses//

Only Twilight could possibly know this. If you'd phrased it as Spike surmising this, that'd be different, but when stated as fact, this has to be Twilight's perspective.

>Spike whirled around and felt his heart leap into his throat//

Likewise, only Spike could possibly know this, and it's just a couple paragraphs after the previous excerpt I made.

>As she drew near, he struggled to not simply lose himself in adoration of her. Not today, today was too important to lose focus.//

Definitey in Spike's head here. And look at the second sentence. Not only are you conveying Spike's opinion, but the narration is taking a conversational tone to where it sounds very much like dialogue. That's another indicator of a limited narrator in his viewpoint.

>he found himself cut off//

The "found himself" instead of just leaving it facutally at him getting cut off now places this back in Spike's perspective.

>Twilight smiled, though it was more in defeat than anything else.//

Back to Twilight.

>Spike chuckled at the memory of Discord's version of their roleplaying game.//

Next paragraph, and back in Spike's viewpoint. You actually stay with him for quite a while, but you don't exactly have a choice, as he's the only one present anymore. Though you still fight that with these references like "the little dragon." Spike wouldn't call himself that.

And so goes the rest of the prologue. Now, as we start chapter 1:
>Formal events in Canterlot were always glamorous affairs//
A narrative opinion, but I don't know whose. It's not Spike, since he isn't there, so you haven't carried over the perspective from the previous chapter. It's important to establish perspective immediately.

>Unfortunately for Twilight Sparkle and Rarity//

In the next paragraph, we now know which characters are even present, but we don't know which one holds the viewpoint.

>hoping the beverage//

It's not until the end of the third paragraph that we get something that can only be from Twilight's perspective.

>a decidedly hard gleam in her eye//

"Decidedly" is a judgment Rarity would make, and Twilight can't see her own eyes anyway, so this has jumped over to Rarity.

>Twilight silently promised herself//

Still the same paragraph, but only Twilight could know this.

>Despite her own words, Rarity frowned a little and looked into her nearly drained glass.//

Except for the one slip, you'd stayed with Twilight, but now we're more explicitly in Rarity's head.

(There's an awful lot of smiling going on. There are other words for that and other ways to display the same emotions.)

>Rarity, whose gaze seemed focused on something in the crowd//

And back to Twilight.

>hile she couldn’t find fault with her friend’s logic, she still felt guilty about agreeing with it.//

And to Rarity.

>in the tone she reserved for friendly lectures//

Probably back to Twilight, but this could plausibly be Rarity's opinion.

>Rarity couldn’t help but chuckling.//

Only Rarity would know what she couldn't help doing.

>Twilight could only sheepishly nod her head//

Same deal, but this is in the same paragraph. You should definitely not use multiple perspectives in one paragraph, even if you have good reason to shift the perspective in the middle of a scene.

>Freed from her station at Twilight’s side, Rarity navigated the little clusters and islands of ponies//

Over to Rarity again, since Twilight's no longer present.

>if Spike had been a young stallion instead of a baby dragon, he would look like the pony before her//

That's a little too on the nose. Give the reader some credit.

Oh... so it's not just supposition. She immediately sees through his disguise? I'm not sure what to think about that.

>Fire Heart could only stammer at first, petrified by both Rarity’s invitation and her intensely hypnotic stare.//

And now back to my tracking of perspective. You're in Spike's head here.

>Rarity found herself stealing glances at her companion//

Just a paragraph later, back to Rarity.

>Despite her words, Rarity’s body language told a very different story//

You've used that phrasing multiple times by now. And this is in Spike's head.

>Rarity watched his change in demeanor with a mixture of guilt and regret and found herself//

Back to Rarity. You also use this "found him/herself" phrasing a lot.

>His fate was truly sealed however, when he felt the insistent tug of unicorn magic on his collar.//

Once more to Spike.

>she felt him begin to follow her//

Back to Rarity.

>For her own part, Twilight Sparkle, Princess of Friendship, had endured just about all she could of the gentry and, with Rarity being safely distant to spare her any embarrassment, had begun to tell the more unpleasant ones just what she thought of them, titles or no.//

Oh, we're going to Twilight now.

>For all her expectations, the reaction each pony had for the other was decidedly different from what she had thought.//

And just as quickly back to Rarity.

>she realized the pony in front of her was sweating with fear//

And to Twilight.

>Rarity only half listened to Twilight’s rambling apology and a feeling of doubt began to eat away at the back of her mind//

Next paragraph, back to Rarity.

>Leading on a strange stallion, toying with him//

Is it really any better if she's leading Spike on?

>happy to be away from the closer scrutiny of the nobles around him//

You'd actually stayed with Rarity for a while, but this is Spike's viewpoint.

>Fire Heart visibly scowled//

This would be Rarity's observation.

I don't need to continue this any further—you should get the picture by now.

One other thing you ought to watch. Look how repetitive this sentence structure gets here:
>The ingredients congealed into molten mass as he continued to read, watching in surprise as they began to liquefy, turning into a bubbling crimson broth.//
You have main clause, "as" clause, participial phrase, "as" clause, participial phrase. Furthermore, "as" clauses and participial phrases serve to synchronize actions, so every single verb in this sentence happens simultaneously. That's probably not reasonable, but it's also hard to keep track of.

I hadn't been keeping detailed notes through chapters 2 and 3, but I had to pull this excerpt:
>Slowly releasing a breath she hadn't realized she was holding//
This is onr of the most cliched things you could have possibly written.

Perspective was obviously a big problem. Why so? Rather than retype it all, I'll just refer you to the section on "head hopping" at the top of this thread.

The other thing is that I never got a sense of the actual romance here. This is another time I'll refer you somewhere instead of typing out a bunch of advice myself. Off his homepage, Aragon has a series of blogs linked on writing romance, and they're worth reading. In short, there doesn't seem to be any more than a physical attraction here, and I don't know why Rarity's toying with Spike at all. Aragon goes into this in depth, but make sure the reader knows exactly what both of them like about the other, what they'd each give and take from a relationship, and why they each think the other would be good relationship material. The story makes it clear they're in love, but in name only. I have the "what," but I'm missing the "why."

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3112

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The opening gets a bit repetitive in structure. It's also a tad confusing. I tried to figure out why it was italicized. I assumed it was because you were starting with an omniscient narration before easing into a limited perspective, then it's a couple paragraphs in before it becomes apparent he's writing something. These kind of bait-and-switch openings can work when they make for a nice surprise, but there's really no payoff here. It adds confusion without getting anything back for it, and when your opening note has no plot relevance (the fact that he's a writer is relevant, but the reader already knows that from reading the front-page description, and what he's writing about has no importance), it doesn't make a good hook.

This also creates a dissonance that may be justified, but it's hard to tell. He's a prospective writer, so it's hard to know whether to take deficinencies in his writing as intentional or stemming from you. For instance, look at what he's written. Every single sentence but one starts with the subject. That creates a repetitive feel. That's probably still going to be the majority of what you write, but when it's this prevalent, it can get plodding to read. Then look at how many "to be" verbs there are. By paragraph of the things he's written, here they all are:
is, is, is
be, is (you're actually doing quite well in this paragraph—lots of active description)
are, are (both of these use passive voice, which compounds the problem I'll discuss in a moment)
are, are, is
It's not overwhelming, but there are quite a few of these. The problem is that these are boring verbs. Nothing happens, and the several instances of passive voice even accentuate that nothing happens. Even a description of something static can use active language, like "he stood there" versus "he was there," and you've got some active descriptions mixed in as well.

Again, am I to take that as a deficiency in his writing or yours? If the former, then I think it'd help immensely if he immediately glances back over it and is dissatisfied for some of these very reasons, or at least a vague sense of them. If it's not until much later in the story that he learns to spot such things, the reader's not suddenly going to remember all this and excuse it. That ship has sailed.

The one thing that does seem to bleed from his writing to yours, at least what I've seen from the first page alone, is some repetition. His "so thus" is redundant, and you have a "start on his description of the station, but it was starting" that exhibits close word repetition.

I see georg already left a comment to this effect (more on that later), but if you've done anything to address it, it isn't clear enough. The only things he acknowledges having trouble with are identifying parts of speech, staying focused, and descriptive language.

Moving on.

>oversized shield shapes and configurations//

This just sounds weird. What's a shield "configuration," and how does it differ from a shape in this context?

>Baked Bean then sighed, slid his pencil into the spiral binding along the top of his notebook, before placing it into his saddlebags.//

The syntax is off here.

Now that I'm a little further in, I see that the overuse of "to be" verbs is continuing outside Bean's writing.

>Celestia’s bright sunlight//

This is a very cliched thing.

>soot and cinders//

He sure tried to make the station sound inviting. Why did he not mention any of the downside like this?

>adjectives – or were they adverbs//

I'm surprised someone who fancies himself a writer wouldn't know the difference. He doesn't even seem to care.

>brass sculptures//

Outdoors? They would be a nightmare to keep shiny.

>wealthy. The whole city was rich, both in atmosphere and monetary wealth//

More close repetition.

You're really hammering in that this guy's poor and everyone around him is rich. I get the point. The only reason to go on at length about it like this would be if it changed, like he's getting angrier and angrier as he thinks about it, but the narrative tone stays constant.

>and while she didn’t usually have time to meet with ponies for very long//

You have a few spots like this where you could use a comma to sett off a dependent clause, but mostly you're good about that.

>no,” he stopped.//

That's not a speaking action, yet you've punctuated/capitalized it as if it is one.

>having a very loose understanding of the rules made it so difficult to know if he was doing things right or wrong//

So he actually is a bit on the ignorant side. This is probably early enough in the story that it doesn't feel like you're unreasonably hiding it from the reader, though like I said about all the inactive "to be" verbs and repeated sentence structure, it'd help if he acknowledged something sounded off about his earlier attempts, even if he couldn't pinpoint what.

It is getting a little off-putting that he's so focused on physical descriptions, and ones that aren't that interesting anyway.

>nicker of annoyance//

>frustrated breath//
His mood is already coming through fine through what he does and the narration's tone. You don't need to short-circuit that by directly identifying the emotion for the reader. You'd already said he was frustrated anyway.

>Then…!//

This is one punctuation combo that's never made sense. How do you trail off emphatically? They're opposite effects.

>was….//

Only three dots. Four is for a specific nonfiction use.

>“There! He’s running away!” A guard shouted.//

You've capitalized the speech tag. It should still be lower-case, even if the quotes doesn't end in a comma.

>She then spun him slowly in the air in front of her.//

Looks like you meant to put a blank line before this.

>There was a few moments//

You have a singular verb with a plural subject.

>same emphasis on vowels and consonants//

That's awfully vague. I can't come up with how that would sound. It's also described kind of weird. If vowels and consonants are emphasized, then what else is there?

>You tend pick up//

Missing word.

>in embarrassment//

Here's another spot where you directly named an emotion that you didn't need to.

>I think you mean you were looking for adjectives//

Yeah, you're revealing this so far after it came up that leaves me feeling like it's the author's mistake for several pages. I'd recommend at least saying he has trouble with parts of speech pretty early on. It's fine to leave it generalized like that, but then it sets it up better. Getting the reader to see something as character incompetence instead of author incompetence can be a tricky business.

>“Yeah, it’s something like that, I guess.” He replied.//

Punctuation/capitalization of speech tag.

>I should have revoked it many years ago//

Seems like "repealed" would be a better word choice. But here's where my suspension of disbelief starts to kick in. Her power hasn't changed over the years. If she could have repealed it long ago, she still can. And it's entirely possible to repeal a law in such a way that its effects are retroactively nullified, i.e., she doesn't still have to follow it because it was still in effect when the nose touch happened. THen when you do try to explain it, you just gloss it over. That's kind of unsatisfactory.

>again.

>
> Bean’s legs again//
Watch the close word repetition.

>happened, truly. If you happen//

Same.

>Wha…duh…buh…oh…guh…//

Leave a space after each ellipsis.

>Yes, Ma’am//

No reason for "ma'am" to be capitalized here.

>really…expect me…to…marry//

Spaces.

>“Wait. You’re the Princess,” Bean spoke his sudden thought//

That does't really parse. The speech can't be the speaking verb's direct object since you already gave it one.

>You…you couldn’t…couldn’t//

Spaces.

Celestia sure is using direct address a lot. Think about how often you actually do when you're having a one-on-one conversation. There are really only three reasons people do so:
1) to get someone's attention
2) to disambiguate who should be listening to them
3) for emphasis
You don't need either of the first two when there are only two people in the conversation, and when you use too much emphasis, it loses the effect, so this isn't working well for the third case, either.

Celestia's behavior is kind of all over the map. When her nose first gets touched, she's very low-key about it, and she treats Bean quite playfully. Yet she goes on about how it's a very serious situation and she needs to do whatever she can to avoid it. Those two things don't mesh. Either this is a terrible occurrence or she's gently guiding him through something inconsequential. Don't play it both ways. The premise itself as well—your synopsis tells of very serious places the story will go, yet having it all founded on something as lighthearted as a nose boop undercuts the tone, unless there ends up being a good reason why a nose touch in particular should be taken this seriously.

The last thing I have to say is that this will be a very difficult thing to pull off well. Of course, I have the benefit of the extended synopsis, but that actually makes things worse in this case. If I had no idea where you planned to take it, then I wouldn't know to be afraid, but you're going to be greeted with a ton of skepticism when you introduce an OC and ship him with a fan favorite canon character.

You really have to get the reader in the character's corner, but I have no reason to yet. He's not endearing. I know very little about him. He's an aspiring writer a little frustrated with his lack of progress, he's pretty cliched in his disdain for the wealthy, and... that's it. You're not going to get a reader to care about him with such a limited portrait, and caring about him is crucial to making a ship between him and Celestia appealing.

One method I've heard is to come up with a list of five adjectives or short phrases that will cover as much of the character's personality as possible. It helps if a couple of them are contradictory, because real people are just like that. Make sure the story exhibits those traits, and try to show at least three of them the first time he appears. You don't have to do that literally, of course, but it's at least a good mental exercise in making sure your characters are well fleshed out.

Maybe you'll do a convincing job of the ship later on, but for one thing, you need to get the reader on board with Bean immediately, and for another, this situation is so ripe to be mishandled that I wouldn't be prepared to approve it sight unseen anyway. So even if you fixed all that stuff, I'd want to see the story far enough along to evaluate how well the shipping is pulled off.

Oh, one more last thing. You'll get a lot more views if you publish on FiMFiction.net. But even if you leave it in GDocs, it'd look a lot better if you cleared the comments out. They just make the story look messy, and you don't want to air your dirty laundry and let everyone see spots where reviewer thought it needed work. That'll bias the reader toward seeing the same flaws.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3113

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

You have a few editing problems like comma splices and consistent confusion between "its" and "it's." More than that, though, I'm seeing a couple more subtle but pervasive problems.

First, the perspective. You're using a limited narrator in Chrysalis's perspective in the prologue. That's clear from the conversational tone you take, as if Chrysalis herself is vocalizing her inner thoughts. But using her as the viewpoint character has several implications. When the narration refers to her as something like "the dethroned queen," it's Chrysalis choosing to call herself that. People don't think about themselves in such external and formal ways. They would tend to use just pronouns and names, except in unusual circumstances. Another example is where you say she didn't feel the tears coming from her eyes. She is the narrator. If she doesn't know the tears are there, neither does the narrator.

Then at the end of the prologue, you go over to Thorax's perspective for only a couple of paragraphs. It's a jarring shift to him that needs to happen much more smoothly, but is it even necessary to? There's nothing critical to the reader's understanding that happens after she leaves, so why not just stop there?

The rationale behind maintaining a steady perspective is discussed at the top of this thread under "head hopping."

And second, you use a ton of participial phrases. They don't turn up that often in everyday language, so they stand out easily when overused. In addition to getting repetitive by having a lot of them, authors tend to place them in the same positions in sentences, which makes them repetitive in structure, not just makeup. They also cause several common errors, and the more you use, the more likely you'll have such mistakes.

I'll pull out some examples to show you.

Here, you start three consecutive paragraphs with a participial phrase, so again, it's not just having them in the sentences but also using the same placement within those sentences.
>Spotting a hidden alcove in a small gorge//
>Nursing her sore joints//
>Continuing on into the cave//

Here are all the other participial phrases within those three paragraphs:
>gliding down to the ledge that jutted just beyond the opening//
>landing without her usual finesse//
>largely ignoring the aesthetics of the place//
>instead following the cave wall around to where the stalactites and stalagmites gave way to a tunnel//
>leading deeper below ground//
>her eyes perfectly adapted to seeing clearly in the deep and dark places of the world// (This one's actually an absolute phrase, but it's another type of participial structure.)
>letting her see the corridor//

So, you're really repetitive with those. Now to the kinds of errors that pop up. Participial phrases like to describe the closest noun or pronoun that comes before them, unless the start a clause, in which case they describe the clause's subject.
>She was surprised to see a carved door at the end of the hallway, taking a moment to register that fact with her beleaguered brain before proper intrigue could even start to take hold.//
Because if its proximity, this sounds like the hallway is taking a moment to register the fact. It's pretty clear a hallway can't do that, but it still creates a sentence that doesn't feel quite right, which isn't good, and eventually you'll run into one of these situations where it truly is ambiguous what the participle describes.

>Continuing on into the cave, Chrysalis noted it’s rugged, natural appearance as on notices an ant, largely ignoring the aesthetics of the place, instead following the cave wall around to where the stalactites and stalagmites gave way to a tunnel leading deeper below ground.//

Participles mean things happen simultaneously, so here, she performs every one of these four actions at the same time. That can be a lot to keep track of, plus the multiple instances of the participles forcing things to sync up can feel oddly worded. But more to the point, that synchronization sometimes doesn't make sense. She wouldn't follow the cave wall to the deeper passage until after she'd gone inside, yet this says they happen concurrently.

I'll read on a bit to see how the human stuff goes initially.

You're directly naming a lot of emotions. That doesn't make for engaging writing. Think of how you have to interpret real people. You don't just innately know someone is happy. You deduce it from how he looks and acts. You might see him laugh and smile, then conclude he's happy. It feels more like real life when a reader has to interpret written characters the same way, so focus more on the evidence of how your characters feel than just telling the reader. There's a section on this at the top of the thread as well, under "show versus tell."

So you introduce Allan in the first scene of chapter 1. All I learn about him in this scene is that he recently started dating someone, and this fact surprises his father. That's nothing to go on. I don't have the first clue what he's like or why I should care what happens to him. You need to define this character better so that he's immediately interesting.

A good exercise for this is to make a list of 5 or 6 traits he has that give a fairly complete description of his personality. Try to make at least a couple of them contradictory, because real people are like that. Make sure the story demonstrates all those traits. And I don't mean just saying what they are. If he's a huge D&D fan, then don't just say he is; show him rattling off a bunch of game statistics. Furthermore, make sure you demonstrate at least 3 of those traits the first time he appears.

He doesn't show up again until 3 scenes later, and I don't learn anything new about him. It's still just those couple of bare facts that hardly elevate him above generic.

Chapter 2 does a good job of keeping to a single perspective per scene and having that viewpoint character interpret the behavior of those around him instead of stating others' feelings as fact. But in this first scene, you're having Thorax do quite a bit of exposition. He knows very specific things, and I get that you've already had Chrysalis able to read Allan's memories, but this still strains credulity, and a lot of it isn't even particularly relevant at the moment. Exposition is often better handled by meting it out in small bits as it becomes important to the plot. All these things that Thorax intuits aren't necessary to understand the story at this time, and note that he's doing a far better job of characterizing Allan than the time we actually spend in Allan's viewpoint. That's not good.

Chapter 3 goes back to having unsteady perspective. The first paragraph immediately establishes Allan's viewpoint, but it only stays there until the third paragraph, which switches to Thorax. The 11th paragraph goes back to Allan, then the 14th returns to Thorax. The 19th seems to go to Twilight, and you stay there for the rest of the scene.

By the 28th paragraph, you're still with Twilight, but look at this:
>Turning her head back to look at him, worry written plainly onto her features. He’d stopped moving, and looked like he was on the brink of tears//
The latter part is clearly her opinion, and it's something she can observe. Fair enough. But in the first part, how could she perceive this? She can't see her own face.

So now I'm a prologue and three chapters into the story, and I still know nothing about your protagonist except from one sentence in the prologue and some exposition Thorax dropped about him in chapter 2, and that's not much to go on. I have no idea who he is, and I have no investment in what happens to him. When the reader doesn't care about your main character, it's all but impossible to keep the story interesting.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3118

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The maroon silk carpets, the paintings on the walls, the vases; the Thief could have taken anything in the palace and been set for the rest of her life.//

That's not really a correctly used semicolon, since you couldn't split the sentence there; what comes before it would be a fragment.

Note that you have quite a few "to be" verbs early in the story. By paragraph through the first screenful, we have:

was
was, was, was, been
was, be
were, wasn't, was, been
wasn't, was, be, be, were, were

This causes several problems:
1. It's very repetitive word choice for a key part of the sentence.
2. It's a boring choice of verb, since nothing actually happens. The readers here to see some action; don't just tell them what is. Even when the situation is static, it can be described with active verbs. "He stood there" has more momentum to it than "he was there," for example. You do get somewhat of a pass for dialogue, since people don't creatively avoid that verb when they speak, and you don't want the dialogue sounding unnatural, but in narration, use active verbs wherever you can. Some "to be" verbs are fine, but you have way too many.
3. The beginning and end of the story are particularly bad places to overuse this verb. The beginning sets the tone that the rest of the story will be just as repetitive and static, and the ending will create more of a lasting impression.

>Bathing in the shadows, she cautiously crept across the right side wall, a candle illuminating only just in front of her, her eyes darting back and forth in a calm paranoia scouting for an outlier.//

You want to avoid repeating structural elements as well, and you've been pretty good about that so far, but it can be very clunky to have multiple ones of the same kind in one sentence. Here, you have <participial phrase, main clause, absolute phrase, absolute phrase, participial phrase. And since absolute phrases are another kind of participial structure, this sentence is really loaded with them. That can be fine in small doses if you want to create the feeling of someone rushed or overwhelmed, but you don't have that here. This character is very much calm and focused, so let the language convey that in its tone. Furthermore, participial elements create actions that occur simultaneously, so you have a lot going on at once. That's hard to keep track of and visualize. And that's precisely why it works in the situations I noted, because it helps you to feel jumbled then, but you don't now.

>nothing's//

That only expands to "nothing is," not "nothing was," so you've switched to present tense.

>Quickly, whispers spread in the criminal underground like a silent plague//

You just talked about whispers in the previous sentence, and this isn't worded in a way that makes a thematic repetition, so it just feels like an oversight.

>impossibly incredible artifacts that had no way of being truly confirmed beyond the whispers//

And now you're repeating it again.

>an high ranking//

a high-ranking

>once impossible dream//

When you have a whole phrase that acts as a single modifier before the noun or pronoun it describes, hyphenate the phrase. (The exception is for two-word phrases beginning in an -ly adverb.) So "once-impossible dream."

>It was all scarce, as only a damned fool would break into the palace inhabited by gods, but that was no concern of hers. As far as she was concerned//

Watch the close repetition of "concern," but this very much is her concern. She may not consider it much of a threat, but she still does have to deal with it, and that by definition makes it her concern.

>the very night Luna loved so dearly would cloak her enemy to perfection//

But wouldn't that work for pretty much any enemy Luna could have? And so wouldn't Luna know that? And so wouldn't she have developed tactics to counteract it? Avoiding Luna's attention is of course the goal, but it's not like that advantage can't be immediately revoked. Does the Thief have a plan in case that happens?

>The most important thing she needed to gather during her earlier reconnaissance outings were the exact moment the guards changed their shift.//

You have a plural verb with a singular object: thing... were.

>As two or three guards passed, their heavy footsteps almost as loud as their breathing, they didn't stop for a second, with any sort of suspicion in their minds violently surpassed by their will to clamber into bed after another long shift.//

A couple of oddities here. The "as they passed" would imply the "they didn't stop for a second anyway," since that would be the default. And the Thief doesn't presume these thoughts on behalf of the guards; they're stated factually, which has her reading their minds.

>it was a silent as her//

Typo.

>Taking a deep breath just as loud as it could be//

That doesn't sound like she's carefully keeping below a threshold; it sounds like she's taking the loudest breath possible.

>It was where the door was.

>
>It was where the crown was.
>
>It was where her legacy was lying in wait.//
In the light of my previous argument against "to be" verbs, this is a horribly stagnant way to phrase what should be one of the story's most exciting moments.

>she could have cared less about//

People use this phrase wrong all the time. If she could have cared less, that means she does care some, which is precisely the opposite of what you're trying to say. Actually, she couldn't care less.

> to the right of the second to last hallway//

All the language you keep using to this effect is both repetitive and confusing. I have no sense of a map in my mind, so this is all meaningless, but it's also unimportant to the plot. Just say when she makes turns and when she's in a hallway, but you don't need to keep reiterating which direction or that it's the next-to-last hall.

>She could hear the old guard's words now, bouncing around her head in a booming echo, swelling with fear, pride and jubilation that she was only moments away from her prize.//

Here's another problem with participles: then like to modify what's near them, so this really sounds like the echo or the guard's words are swelling with pride. It's located way too far from what it's trying to describe.

>Looking around once last time, she turned to the lock on the door, a plain and inconspicuous mechanism that looked//

More close word repetition.

>Tying it carefully around her horn, the Thief cast a spell//

And there's that synchronization of participles I talked about earlier, except this time it's not action overload, but contradiction. This says she's casting the spell while tying the fur, but she wouldn't work the spell until after she'd finished.

>a spell that could replicate the aura of any unicorn (or in this case, alicorn) with a piece of their fur//

This would be a sentence fragment, so the semicolon before it is improper.

>She slipped through the door frame and closed it behind her//

This sounds like she closed the door frame, not the door.

>anything like like what rested before her//

Inadvertently repeated word.

>speckled//

Are you sure you didn't mean "sparkled"? You haven't given this a direct object, and "speckle" is transitive.

>like and eternity//

Typo.

>A pair of magenta eyes caught her vision in the corner of her eye.//

Watch the repetitive use of "eye."

>has assumed//

You've gone to present tense.

>and while Twilight gathered she was currently scared out of her mind, she certainly made no show of it//

This is weirdly phrased. At first it states as fact what the Thief couldn't know for sure, but then it explicitly says the Thief has zero evidence of it. It's fine for her to speculate, but make it clear that's what she's doing. Oh, wait. You've gone over to Twilight's point of view. I'll see if that's a warranted shift, but you've done it so abruptly that it's jarring and confusing.

>Twilight scanned the mare with her eyes//

What else would she use? This'd certainly be the default anyway.

>the Princess nodded her head towards the crown on the pedestal.//

Capitalization.

>this...what//

It's better to leave a space after an ellipsis, unless it starts a sentence or is followed by other punctuation. It formats better on FiMFiction, since you can't control the typesetting.

>The Princess stepped forward, her whole upper half of her body now revealed to the Thief. Her own crown was missing from atop her head, leaving the only thing different about the Princess to be her wings.//

It's really strange for this to be coming from Twilight's perspective. Have you gone back over to the Thief? It's hard to tell. Even if you're staying with Twilight, it's odd for her to choose to refer to herself as "the Princess." In fact, it was strange all along for the Thief to do something similar for herself, but it's a conceit you see from time to time so you can hide her identity.

>With that's Twilight's warm smile//

Typo.

>Cerise's posture tightened, unsure of what the Princess was attempting to accomplish.//

Now it does seem you've gone back to Cerise's perspective. And it explicitly says her posture was unsure, not that Cerise was.

>I...I//

Leave a space. In fact, it's better if you use a single-character ellipsis instead of three separate dots, but it looks like you're editing directly on FiMFiction, which won't do that automatically.

>the Princess turned to Cerise.//

Capitalization. This has no speaking action, so it can't be a speech tag. It needs to be a separate sentence.

>There was a clear look of sorrow sparkling in her eyes//

And this is back in Cerise's viewpoint. Twilight can't see her own face to describe this, and it's not how she'd perceive the emotion anyway. You don't have to look in a mirror to know you're happy, after all.

>At least...I was.//

Leave a space.

>Everyday I wish it was something else.//

>everyday I tell myself//
"Every day" isn't the same as "everyday." You picked the wrong one. And with where this is going, why aren't the CMCs the ones tackling this problem?

>other pony's things//

Unless she only steals from one pony, that needs to be a plural possessive.

>If I ever see you near these walls again, I won't be so forgiving.//

Wait, what? She's condoning theft as long as it's not from the palace? How is that fair?

>She couldn't see her now//

I can't tell which is which.

>the Equestria's ruler//

Extraneous word.

I like this idea, and it is just like Twilight to be that understanding. I've also thought about this problem of a pony having a cutie mark that would drive them to do things that were illegal or unethical, and it's interesting to think about. I am a little surprised she didn't suggest Cerise consult the CMCs, since this is precisely their bailiwick. I'm even a little bit sympathetic to Twilight saying Cerise can't help what her talent is, but it does rather absolve her of any responsibility for her actions, which is a hard position to get behind. And I still can't get over her basically saying it's okay for Cerise to keep stealing, as long as it's not from the palace.

You've actually set up a very interesting philosophical question here, but you sidestep it instead of exploring it. Not that you have to—if that's not what you want your story to be about, fair enough.

Aside from that, it's mostly mechanical and stylistic things I've already marked, like the repetitive word choices, preponderance of "to be" verbs, participle issues, and unsteady perspective.

Thief and the Princess Country code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3120

Thanks again for reading, it is a huge help! I went back and fixed all the grammar related edits and removed a plethora of "was" and "been" words. I just wanted to address your comment at the end about the plot, because I do like to know what people think about the story.

In MY eyes, Twilight is not condoning theft as long as it is at the castle. She understands that theft is illegal, and the effect it can have on the life of a pony. She also knows that it is Cerise's destiny, so she explains that she's going to let her go, but that if she comes back to the castle, there won't be a second chance. Finally, in one last line of dialogue, she attempts to convince Cerise that, while she may not be able to stop stealing, she can possibly use that talent for other than sole material gain (think Robin Hood, or maybe even working for Equestria in some sort of way with this talent).

I liked writing this story because it could be approached in lots of ways, and I wanted to give Twilight a dilemma that wasn't so easily solved, one that she could handle in the wisdom of Celestia and Luna. If the story doesn't come across that way, I totally get it, so let me know! I am not adverse to changing things around :)

Thank you again so much for the proofread! I am very very grateful and i hope I am not bothering you with this reply!

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3128

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Some times, to ensure that something - or someone - is safe, we resort to drastic measures.//
"Sometimes," and please use proper dashes, either en dashes with spaces or em dashes with no spaces.

>Sometimes, those drastic measures have long reaching consequences.//

Needs a blank line before this to separate the paragraphs, and when you have a multi-word phrase acting as a single modifier before the thing they describe, hyphenate it: long-reaching.

Story:
>My entire life has lead up to this.//
The past tense is "led."

>shines through the thick waxy walls of the chrysalis, shining//

Watch the close word repetition.

>I’m not a huge fan of this color//

This sounds almost comedic, which is undercutting the tone. Also consider the disconnect between what the narration says and how it says it. This character is alarmed and upset, but the narration is delivering it in a flat tone with no emotion to it. And since I'm breaking away to make a comment anyway, I'll say that you have pretty repetitive sentence structure. To this point, I've only seen one sentence that didn't start with the subject. When I keep getting the same beginning over and over again, it gets plodding.

>Will it hurt? Will it burn? I’m so terrified, and I suddenly realize I do not want to die, not like this, but I can’t struggle. I can’t move, I can barely see a few inches in front of me! No, I want to get out, but I can’t! I’m hyperventilating, and probably using up what little air there is in here. It’s crowded, I’m trapped, and I wish I could be anywhere but here.//

Ah, this is what I was looking for. Why not create this tone earlier? This actually sounds terrified.

>The air smells like my breath, and I wish I’d brushed my teeth.//

Again, this is undercutting the seriousness, as it takes a comedic mood.

>I wish somepony else were here//

You keep using this "I wish" phrasing. It's getting repetitive.

>I’m getting ahead of myself, though. Perhaps I should start at the beginning.//

Okay. This opens a whole can of worms. You're implying an audience, but you haven't defined one. Furthermore, by making it present tense, that audience is there with this character inside the chrysalis, and yet she hasn't been speaking aloud, so... who's listening and how?

>Queen Quartz was exhausted.//

This is kind of jarring. The first two paragraphs of the scene don't mention anyone but Flex being there, so he's presumed to be the perspective character. Then in this paragraph, it's evident the queen is, and then I have to look back over the opening two paragraphs to see whether they still work in her viewpoint or if you've done a clumsy perspective shift. Either way, there's a big speed bump here. Establish the queen's perspective right away, or this just gets confusing.

>stars knows//

With the prevailing tense, this should be "knew."

>The captain wobbled caught himself an inch before his muzzle hit the floor.//

He just wobbled a paragraph ago, and the wording is off here.

>before her expression turned somber again.//

Keep in mind you're using her as the perspective character. How can she see her own face to make this judgment? Keep the narration limited to things she can actually perceive.

Chapter 1:

Chapter 1 has the same repetitive sentence structures the prologue did. Such an overwhelming majority of narrative sentences start with the subject. It's understandable tha lots of sentences in a first-person narration will start with "I," but it's worth trying to work around that where you can. You're also falling back into the limited narration sounding very unemotional at a time the perspective character wouldn't be.

>A spray of warm water hits my side and I curl up reflexively.//

>I feel damp silky fur against my hoof, and it comforts me.//
Look at the inconsistent comma usage here. The second one is correct.

>hot water//

She only mentioned it being warm. When did it get hot?

>rubbing my main//

mane

>for her muzzle looks feminine//

This is awkwardly wedged in. I had to read the sentence twice to get the syntax. I'd recommend setting this off with dashes instead of commas so it's demarcated in a way the reader will expect to find a disjoint thought.

>Is that good, or bad?//

This is the type of spot you don't need a comma with a conjunction. It's just a compound structure, not a separate clause with its own verb and subject.

>So many questions, sister.//

>It’s a rather long story, sister//
>There isn’t much time, sister.//
>Because you have no other choice, sister.//
>It’s the closest way in and out of our hive, sister. //
>I will remain up here, sister//
>chorusing We’re here with you, sister// (This one needs a comma to set off the quote, too.)
>Relax, sister//
>You’re not crazy, sister//
>Welcome to Hive Quarry, sister.//
Family relations get capitalized when used as terms of address.

>My eyes are teal, and lack pupils//

>somepony had tried to straighten out Pixie’s crooked horn, and missed a few spots//
Another few spots that don't need the comma.

>‘ling//

Note that smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way or type two in a row and delete the first. Apply this through all the chapters. You also sometimes forget to put the apostrophe on this word.

>as far as our hive and I are concerned//

>Welcome to the Hive//
Inconsistent capitalization of "hive." Just make sure you go through the whole story, whichever one you choose, as there are other spots.

>She lets me go as soon as my hooves brush against the ground, humming gently as I unsteadily catch my balance.//

It's ambiguous who or what is humming here.

>landing gracefully next to me, folding her wings back and heading off at a quick pace down the street.//

I'd recommend insterting a "then" after the comma. As it is, the participles mean that all these things happen at once, yet she wouldn't head off until after landing.

>My legs wobble as I follow her.//

You just used "wobble" not long ago.

>half-crumbled building. The corner of it has crumbled//

Watch the close word repetition.

>My immediate thought is that it depends on what the question is//

But she knows what the question is. It's "do you trust me?"

>I get a nagging feeling in the back of my mind that I shouldn’t question it//

And then the close repetition of "question" in a different sense feels strange.

>Pixie smiles, and levitates the rope around my midsection.//

Don't need the comma.

The changeling//
Now that Flurry knows a name to call her, why would she fall back on this descriptor?

>This is insane, there’s no way I’m jumping down there!//

And you're starting to capture that narrative voice you've been missing for a lot of the story. She's upset, so the narration sounds upset, like the thought would actually be vocalized inside her own head.

>My stomach lurches, and darkness consumes me as I fall.//

But now you've gone back to the narration sounding pretty emotionless when the character would be decidedly otherwise.

>high pitched//

Hyphenate.

>The water gets closer and I scream.//

See, the tone of the narration is at a decided contrast to what's actually happening to her and what her actions say she must be feeling.

>The changelings don’t flinch but they buzz their wings//

Needs a comma.

>He says//

Missing a comma, and you started the italics before the actual quote.

>their-//

Please use a proper dash. I'll just leave it that you need to go through the story for these.

>Don’t scare her, Axiom! The male voice chides.//

Seems like you meant that to be a speech tag, but you've capitalized it.

>they all looked like Pixie, but they all have subtle differences. One, the most female-looking of them all//

A lot of repetition of "all."

>so that I can’t really tell what their gender was//

Why have you switched to past tense?

>My eyes dilate//

How does she know? She can't see them. She can perceive the effect it causes, but then that's what she should be narrating.

Chapter 2:

>baskets slung across their back.//

They don't share a single back between them, do they?

>a questioning look on my face//

Perspective again. How can she see this to know? More to the point, when you're questioning something, is your mind really on what expression you're wearing? You're more likely asking a mental question or feeling confused. Some specific things you might note, like raise eyebrows, but not the overall expression.

>She spins around and walks backwards to face me.//

I'm having trouble visualizing how she could turn around and while facing Flurry walk backwards and stll approach her.

>carefully-styled//

No hyphen.

>The changeling clears her throat and I look up at her.//

Needs a comma, and you have a close repetition of "look" in the next sentence.

>breathe, sister//

Capitalization.

And I'll break in here to say this chapter is doing a much better job of the narrative tone When she's upset, the narration shouts, for instance, and it generally reflects her mood well.

>I let out a breath I didn’t know I was holding//

This is one of the top three most cliched things you could possibly write. It's up there with "a single tear ran down her cheek" and "it was a dark and stormy night."

>but when looks at me for a split second//

Missing word.

>but when I try to concentrate on one//

Needs a comma here.

>slung under their backs//

Wait, how does that work? The stuff's inside them?

>Bridges of the sparkly grey stuff connects towers//

You have a plural subject (bridges) with a singular verb (connects).

>light shines through it, lighting//

So the light lights?

>I’m not kidding//

This really creates the feel again that she's aware she has an audience for her story. It's just weird.

>making Hive Central looks//

Typo.

>and when I turn to follow her//

Needs a comma here.

>Welcome to being part changeling, sister.//

>Try not to freeze, sis!//
>Relax, sister//
Capitalization.

>I want to mimic her stance//

Needs a comma.

>Her wings are spread slightly, and shimmer in the cool light.//

And that doesn't need a comma.

>take my eyes of the female changeling//

Typo.

Chapter 3:

>Queen Quartz lifts my head gently with a hoof, and helps me to my hooves.//

Don't need that comma.

>They’re… something//

It's quite possible that's the correct word choice for the thought that got cut off, but if it's the same thought getting picked back up, it sounds like that should have been "there's."

>The Queen stops suddenly//

Needs a comma here to separate the clauses.

>an unreadable expression on her face. I can’t make out her emotions, even though I’m standing right next to her. I catch flickers of fear, grief, a pain I can’t even begin to describe, but they’re gone as soon as I’m able to name them.//

Okay, this passage is odd. She starts out saying the same thing twice, then contradicts it.

>Queen Quart//

Typo.

>poorly-timed//

You don't need to hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb. There's no ambiguity in what modifies what.

>they celebrate their differences, and remember the outstanding//

Don't need that comma.

>You have no reason to apologize, Flurry Heart.//

She's been using direct address an awful lot and continues to do so throughout the chapter. Think about how often you actually do when you're talking one-on-one with someone. It's not much. You don't need to get their attention or make it clear whom you're addressing. That leaves emphasis, but the more emphasis you use, the weaker it gets.

>not even their royal guards couldn’t keep you safe//

You have a double negative that's changing the meaning to something you didn't want.

>Queen Quartz’s face contorts into an expression of unbridled grief.//

You've been doing this a lot in this chapter. Avoid directly naming emotions, particularly in an in/of/with phrasing. Normally, the answer is to describe what the character does and how they look to get across the emotion without saying it. Here, however, we have a narrator uniquely attuned to emotion. You can still do it the regular way, but it'd be interesting to play with the unusual perceptions she has now and talk more about how the emotions taste or what physical sensations they cause her.

>arching like lightning//

While it's possible you actually meant this as written, it's more likely you intended "arcing."

>The grass below my hooves are soggy.//

You have a singular subject (grass) with a plural verb (are). I also don't see the need to italicize this entire scene. It's plenty obvious it's a flashback, and extended passages of solid italics just get irritating to read.

>I can see the outline of a rabbit between the branches of the hedge. False alarm.//

Why's she so sure that isn't a changeling? Can she tell?

>It had served its purpose, and killed itself to avoid interrogation and punishment.//

Don't need that comma.

>back, my back//

Watch the close repetition.

>my brow furrowing in a mixture of shock and outrage//

Let her actions and the tone of the narration carry the emotion instead of just saying what it is.

Chapter 4:

The beginning of this chapter is stagnating under all the "to be" verbs. Some of these are unavoidable, but just the sheer number. Here they are by paragraph for the first couple screens:
I'm, I'm, that's, I'm, I'm
be, am, am, is, being, you're, is
that's, there's, I'm, I'm, be, be
be, be, they're, isn't
it's, being, it's, is, is, be, that's, are, that's, I'm
It's, isn't, I'm, isn't, I'm, I'm
I'm
it's, I'm
-
I'm
See how that get's better suddenly? But for the first 6 paragraphs, you're averaging over 6 per paragraph. This is bringing the story to a grinding halt.

>Its like looking at a crowd//

Its/it's confusion.

>and the wing roaring past my primaries feels nice and cool//

I think you meant "wind."

>the wind yanks my wings up painfully. Ouch. Note to self: don’t suddenly unfurl your wings while falling.//

This doesn't fit the mood at all. First, she's supposed to be fearing for her life and in pain, but the delivery sounds like she's bored out of her mind. Then she injects levity into a situation that doesn't call for it. You're killing the mood.

>And then it hit me. Not a solution to my problems, just the ground.//

And again. She's supposed to be fearful, and the story hasn't been making jokes until now, but suddenly you're going for lowbrow humor? This is tonal whiplash.

>As I’m taking a deep breath to start explaining what happened to me//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

Why doesn't Flurry feel like she needs to go finish her conversation with the queen? She just kind of left.

>Axiom shifts uncomfortably, and I almost want to comfort her//

That's a weird, repetitive juxtaposition.

>work. I’ve got a lot to work//

Watch the close repetition.

>pinchers//

Usually "pincers."

>His glowing eyes and the tattered remains of his hivemind leads//

You have a compound subject but a singular verb.

>She wouldn’t tolerate excuses, no matter the cause, no matter how important this mission was for the good of the Hive and changelingkind.//

Why have you switched into past tense here?

>few haphazard pods for his siblings to catch a few//

Close repetition.

>they made due//

do

>KI-77 is almost jealous of his former sister as he trembled before his Queen.//

Switched to past tense again.

>wasperfection//

Missing space.

You have a good start to the story here. The plot and characters are interesting, and it doesn't drag. The only issues are some low-level mechanical ones that are easy to fix, plus the unevenness in having the narrative tone follow the mood of what's happening. Sometimes when Flurry is upset, her narration sounds upset, but at others, it only says she's upset while sounding like a documentary voice-over. If you could take a crack at these things, I could definitely see posting your story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3138

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Your door opens slowly and an indigo pony muzzle pops through the grasp//

There are a few spots like this, where you could use a comma between the clauses.

>wizard- Lord Swirlystar, or something like that- she//

Please use proper dashes. There are lots of these throughout the story.

>Evidently, you were also a source of powerful magic which allowed Luna an easy route back to her world and filled Luna with a sense of, as she put it, ‘regeneration’.//

This seems like we're missing an awful lot of interesting story. We're kind of past where they're figuring things out and on to where it's more routine. Did Luna instinctively know it would work this way? Or did she have to go by trial and error? We're also kind of missing their emotional investment in the process. Don't just say this is how things work. Let me see how the characters feel about it.

>Kicking her silver shoes off and removing her crown and headpiece, she places a single hoof up onto your bed.//

Participles make things happen at the same time, so she kicks off a shoe while simultaneously putting a hoof on the bed.

>“Of course!” a tinkling noise briefly emanates from behind your head and the lights click off.//

The part after the quote isn't a speaking action, so it shouldn't be lower-case as if it's a speech tag.

>quickly-morphing//

You don't need hyphens in two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb, since it's not ambiguous what modifies what.

>standing aside it//

You meant "beside," right?

>“Violence is your sleep aid?” She asks intently.//

Capitalization.

>y...when//

The typesetting formats better if you leave s space after the ellipsis, especially if you use a program that automatically converts three dots to a single-character ellipsis.

>“Now it is four of six,” she grins.//

Another non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>eyes fixated on the television//

"Fixed" is closer to what you want. People confuse the two a lot.

>your highness//

Honorifics like this should be capitalized.

>gently run over Luna’s hooves, you can hear the gentle//

Watch the close word repetition.

>the quiet ambience of snuggling; the scratching of your fingers against her coat and the soft ruffling of her feathers.//

What comes after the semicolon couldn't stand as an independent sentence, so it isn't used right. You're defining somthing here, so a colon would do fine.

>You’re the Princess.//

He hadn't been capitalizing that when it wasn't used with her name.

The fact that Luna has been helping him sleep is so generic. What kinds of problems had that been causing in his life? How much better are things now? That's the kind of thing that makes a story out of directionless fluff.

>Noticing you in the corner of her eye, She//

Capitalization.

>she hissed playfully//

Why are you going to past tense?

>Although…” she sighs blissfully//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag again.

>her hoof was taken care of//

Gone to past tense again.

>having her many brushed//

Typo.

>once in awhile//

"Awhile" and "a while" aren't interchangeable. You need it as two words here.

>one peeked open//

>began to quiver//
Switched to past tense.

>Woah//

Why can't anyone spell this right?

>“I’ve always been fluffy,” she winks.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>Inhaling gently, you let out a quiet, muffled groan of approval.//

The participle is synchronizing things that shouldn't be. How can she let a groan out while breathing in?

>“Nothing,” she grinned.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag, and it's past tense.

>Luna’s voice sounded far away.//

Past tense.

>Her head lies on your chest, her mane gently brushing across your chest//

Watch the repetitive phrasing.

>Walking her over to the couch, you sit her down.//

Synchronized actions that shouldn't be.

>Nabbing a blanket from a nearby chair, you spread it out and tuck Luna in it, running your hands behind her back and flanks to make sure she is securely snuggled down.//

And that's an awful lot of actions that are supposed to be happening all at once.

>“She is so embarrassing,” Luna cringed.//

Non-speaking action as speech tag.

>But, don’t worry//

It's rarely correct to put a comma after a conjunction.

>Luna sighed//

Past tense.

>Princess Luna tilts her head. “What do you mean?”//

Missing a line break before this paragraph.

Okay, the good news: the writing here is not bad at all. I think you're a capable author, and I think you can write the kind of quality we'd be happy to feature. But this story isn't it, not in its current state.

Basically, nothing happens. Everything is so superficial. I mentioned before how it would help to delve into the background of how all this came to be and what it means to them, but it's just the cuddling with a small bit of lip service paid to giving it any depth. I'm looking at the author's note for the last chapter.

>it became a reflection on the growth of a relationship, the capacity of cuddling to heal and comfort//

But it really didn't. Each of them did take a turn at getting sick, and each one took a turn at caring for the other, but the cuddling didn't have any sort of additional effect. What kind of situation does he have in his life that this cuddling made a real difference to him, when it was the catalyst that made things turn out for the better? Same for her. Why is this such a big deal to Luna? I'm missing all the context as to why any of this matters, and the human character never gets much personality. I don't know anything about him. Maybe that's an attempt to make him so he can fit any reader, but it leaves him without enough definition to give me a rooting interest in what happens to him.

>I forget who it is, but one of the better writers on this site has as their bio, "Stories about ponies are stories about people." Wise words indeed.//

That would be Cold in Gardez.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3144

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Your synopsis is littered with semicolons, and none of them are used right. You should be ave to replace one with a period and have the resulting sentences stand as complete, but that wouldn't work here.

>A few others congratulate me and I stop to thank them before finally opening the door to the drama room.//

You have a number of spots like this, where you could use a comma betwen the clauses.

You're inconsistent at whether you use proper dashes or double hyphens.

>wants to date me?//

When a word is italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>a neutral expression//

That's a really external evaluation. She can't even see his own face to say how this looks. More immediate to her would be her emotional state, not how she looks. You don't have to look in a mirror to know how you feel, after all.

>I still kept my eyes aimed upward//

You've slipped into past tense.

>“Alright,” I say. “Thank you. I’ll leave.”//

This just feels weird. It's very abrupt, it doesn't sound natural, and it doesn't answer the janitor's question.

>My eyes burn and shake my head from side to side.//

This doesn't make sense.

>My ears lay tight against my head.//

Lay/lie confusion. "Lay" requires a direct object.

Three things strike me about the prologue. First, such a preponderance of the narrative sentences start with the subject and are about the same length that the story gets in a structural rut. Second, you sometimes get relatively heavy on "to be" verbs. These are inherently boring verbs, as nothing happens. You really ought to be choosing active verbs where you can. And third, the whole point of the story is to believe Gold and Jade are in love, but we barely get any reason why. We just have to take the narrator's assurances that they are. You only spend a single paragraph building it up. There are a couple of nice anecdotes in there, and that's one of the better ways to depict a relationship: demonstrate it.

Real people have a give and take. They bring things to a romance and get things out of it. They also believe the other person does as well, so that they're more or less equals. I won't go into too much detail, as someone else already has. Aragon has a good series of blog posts on writing romance linked off his homepage, and they're worth reading. If you want this romance to feature prominently in the story, you have to quickly get the reader invested in it, and so far, it comes across as pretty superficial.

The beginning of chapter 1 is pretty heavy on "to be" verbs again.

>My heart fell to my hooves, and breathing suddenly became very difficult.//

You've slipped into past tense again.

>his ears lay back//

Lay/lie confusion again.

>But…” he trails off.//

The ellipsis already means he trails off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

After class starts, you blaze through an awful lot of the day in a single paragraph, and it sounds so stoic. Gold should be very emotional about this, but you wouldn't know it from the narrative tone.

>I look up at him and nod; he smiles; we walk our respective ways.//

It's pretty clunky to have more than one semicolon, unless they're part of a superlist.

>and her intoxicating scent of rose water and sweat//

She normally smells sweaty?

>well,” Sandy Prose pauses.//

You've punctuated/capitalized that like a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.

>a, “Hi, Gold,” in//

You don't need the first and last commas here, as this isn't actually dialogue.

>go to him without going//

Watch the close word repetition.

>I know very little about her home life; about what happens outside of these walls.//

Misused semicolon.

>I look away from my friend, glancing around the cafeteria.//

It's ambiguous which one is glancing around. Gramatically speaking, Pale is.

>I feel the bile rising to the back of my throat again; my eyes beginning to water.//

Misused semicolon, and this part of the story is another exaple of where the narrative action depicts someone who's very emotional, yet the tone of the narration is rather bland. For a limited narrator (and first person is as limited as it gets), the narration is the character's thoughts. If she's upset, her thoughts wouldn't be so calm and lifeless.

>“You can’t lie to me, Gold,” her voice has turned dark, dangerous.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag again. It's also kind of over the top that Rhubarb is so immediately mean. What's her motivation? Gold's only said simply that she doesn't like Rhubarb, but this is outright malicious.

>“Oh, and,” she says, looking down at me, “if she’s dead, you will be too.”//

I don't get this at all. Rhubarb is so pointlessly antagonistic that it's coming across as more of a caricature. It doesn't feel very authentic. And so what if Jade did ask Gold out and Gold turned her down? It's not like Gold has an obligation to date her. I can't figure out Jade's motivation. I can't imagine she'd be any happier if the two were dating.

>that phantom odor of rosewater and sweat//

What's her obsession with the smell of sweat?

>laying in a small, sterile cot//

>My black cat beanie, black cat socks and black-and-pink choker lay in a heap//
Lay/lie confusion.

>equally-white//

Don't hyphenate two-word phrases starting with an -ly adverb. There's no ambiguity in what modifies what.

>she was depressed enough to contemplate suicide if I didn’t accept//

Why's she become so convinced this is true? She's stating it as fact, yet she's only basing it on what Rhubarb said, whom she shouldn't believe anyway, and Pale vaguely not answering a question about it.

>his red eyes showing his concern//

You just had his voice showing concern a couple paragraphs ago, but you should really avoid directly naming emotion like this anyway. In real life, we have to read little context clues about how people look and act to determine how they feel. It comes across as more realistic when we have to do the same for written characters. So just describe how he looks and what he does, and let me conclude that he's concerned.

>Oh, Honey//

That's a generic nickname. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>Mister Gold, can you leave us?//

This is pretty iffy, questioning her without a parent.

>Hearing myself say that I love Dawn is so foreign; so strange.//

Misused semicolon, and I still have very little picture myself of what makes her love Jade.

>her…” I trail off.//

Redundant.

>Over the next few minutes, Detective Strike asks me more specifics on times and the ponies I met or recognized in the crowd.//

This will be tricky. You haven't necessarily done anything wrong here, but it depends on exactly what you want this story to be. If you want it to be more of a mystery, then think of it in those terms. You want to present evidence to the reader so that he can keep or disregard the bits, but you don't want to skip over things, because then you're jumping the gun and saying none of that is important. Hearing what Strike asks is a bad thing to skip if you want the reader trying to piece together the mystery. That's the draw of one, after all: seeing if you can solve it before the story reveals the truth.

However, if this is less a mystery and more about Gold's experiences, then it may be reasonable that she's so shocked about all this that it barely registers with her. That's up to you, but make sure the whole story is consistent in that regard.

>There was no sign of sadness; no sign of depression//

Misused semicolon.

>If anything happened to trigger her depression, it wasn’t me.//

I still don't get what ever made Gold buy into this line of thinking. Rhubarb first suggested it, and it was all based on Gold rejecting her, but Gold knows that isn't true, so why would Jade kill herself before getting her answer? This isn't feeling like an authentic train of thought.

>It’s okay, Honey//

Again, that wouldn't be capitalized.

>I think I had information for them that they weren’t expecting and that could really help the case.//

What information is that? Just that Jade never got to ask her? I'm kind of surprised Strike didn't already know the janitor had seen her waiting. Seems like a person and place she would have already covered in her investigation.

>“Oh, Siamese, Honey,” he squeezes me.//

Capitalized nickname, and non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

Overall, the major things I see are the lack of a match between the narrative tone and Gold's apparent emotional state, and that I don't know enough about the actual love interest to feel they actually are in love. It's important to get that right when it's a central feature of your story. Maybe you'll get to that later, but if that's the intent, you're quickly running out of time. If you don't get the reader invested early, you risk them dropping the story. To wit, you have a fairly precipitous drop-off in views between the prologue and first chapter, and I wonder if this isn't a main reason why.

Another possibility is that there's nothing inherently pony so far. You could make these human characters, and you'd barely have to change anything, certainly nothing important.

Back to the love interest, though: one of the more powerful ways to show they work as a couple is through anecdote. You made the right choice in having Gold reminisce about feelings she had for Jade, as that establishes them well before hand, but they're a bit vague and unfocused. Sprinkle some more throughout, and go for specific events, times she did something that Gold found endearing, what things about Jade's personality and appearance that Gold noted. And give me the other side. What are some times Jade found Gold endearing or remarked about some quality of Gold's she enjoyed, and maybe Gold didn't realize it at the time, but she's putting the pieces together now. These don't have to be long, but it does take specificity. Not just that Gold found Jade pretty, but that the green dress with the white stripe that really accentuated her shoulders, or the time she just had to stop by the roadside to make sure the ladybug had crawled safely away and wouldn't get stepped on by anyone... These are just examples, but note they're short, yet they're not the least bit generalized, and they pick a couple of details to really focus on and give a vivid picture of who these two are and what sparks their interest about each other. This is a great way to get reader buy-in.

I will say that there's writing talent here. The sentence-level crafting usually shows a pretty good flow, and you've done a good job of characterizing Gold. Instead of having her give an expository description of herself, as many authors are wont to do, you let her personality come through in her interactions with others. That's absolutely the right way to handle it. It is a little odd that you'll apparently later cast her as a famous cat burglar, yet she's a minor (still quite possible), and this hasn't even gotten the slightest mention in the story so far (if it's going to be that important to the plot, it seems a curious omission, though not an impossible one to manage).

So if you could give me a better taste that there's an actual in-depth love interest here, and have Rhubarb a little less cliched, and if you could have the narration convey her emotion better... Well, I'll expand on that a bit.

Internal thoughts sound a lot like dialogue, so think of the narration as being a lot like that. These are actual things that would be running through Gold's head, even if they're not italicized or quoted as thought. In fact, having that avenue available means you should rarely, if ever, need to use italicized or quoted thought, and in fact, you don't have any. But it's not just what the narration says—it's how it says it. If she's angry, the narration should shout. If she's confused or chocked, it can fumble for words. If she's excited, it should sound joyful. And adding italics (emphasis) on just the right words here and there changes not just the meaning but the cadence.

So yeah, if you can do that (and just maybe have something irrevocably pony about the story?), I could see posting this.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3151

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

I don't understand the point of your first scene break. There's no jump in time, place, or perspective.

>The record began to spin and he delicately lowered the needle//

You have a number of spots like this, where there are multiple clauses, essentially where each subject gets its own verb (record began... and he lowered). Most times, you'll want to put a comma between clauses.

>“No, no!” He cried//

Jus because the dialogue ends in an exclamation mark doesn't change the rules about not capitalizing speech tags.

>Is that an ice sculpture of a dragon, he wondered//

Isn't that a question?

>It jumped and immediately galloped towards a blue flame that Star Bright hadn’t noticed until now and simply stood there, transfixed.//

This is a little confusing. Thorax galloped toward a flame? I'm not sure why. Maybe this happened in the episode this obviously references, but I don't know that you can count on readers remembering it in that much detail. And the way this is worded, it sounds like Thorax is the one standing transfixed, which is contradictory to him galloping.

>Star Bright picked up the bouquet and held them//

You're using a plural "them" to refer to a singular "bouquet."

>that,” He heard Roseluck comment//

Capitalization.

>“Oh, so many,” Star Bright pointed to the graph containing multiple circles of different size and color./

You're trying to use a non-speaking action as a dialogue tag.

>she smiled.//

Capitalization.

>I don’t get to participate in question and answer part of the tours//

Seems like you're missing a "the," and you're using "question and answer" as a single modifier, so hyphenate it.

>silver tongued?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include any exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>the stallion’s gardening//

It's ambiguous which one you mean. They're both stallions, after all.

>had perhaps they had fallen //

Wording is jumbled here.

>Star Bright stood still for a moment and watched Silver Script’s determined gaze that was so focused he didn’t even blink, at his forelegs as they bent down so that he could ruffle through the soil, and at his wings as they occasionally extended.//

I can't quite parse this. Where does the "at" come from? As near as I can figure, it branches from "watched," but "watched at" is a strange phrasing.

>You’re making daddy so proud.//

When used effectively as a name, family relations get capitalized. So "Daddy" would, but "your daddy" wouldn't.

>Silver Script himself even tried//

>Star Bright even recalled//
Watch the repetitive "even" phrasing so close together.

>juicy looking//

Hyphenate.

>the stallion//

You're really overusing that as a descriptor.

>Silver Script paused and his eyes darted around.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>dropped the trowel into the toolbox//

But they already put the tools in the box.

>reaching out to place a hoof on Silver Script’s cheek, keeping it there until he made eye contact.//

The way you've used these participles means they happen at the same time, but they'd have to happen one after the other.

>far off look//

far-off

>looking for story ideas.” He looked//

>already open. He turned to ask Silver Script if he had already//
Watch the close word repetition.

>Star Bright bowed down as Princess Luna entered the room//

Take a look at this paragraph. It's symptomatic of something that's popped up occasionally. Every sentence starts with the subject. Every sentence is an independent clause with a compound structure or some sort of parenthetical element following. When you see the same structure over and over again, it can get in a rut. Go for a little more variety.

>Princess Luna seemed to catch on to his nervousness//

This is a pretty advanced topic, but your narration has been omniscient so far. However, "seem" is a subjective thing, so it wouldn't work with an omniscient viewpoint. You could say it seemed to him, because that's a factual statement. By leaving it as "seem," it's the narrator's opinion, but your narrator doesn't inhabit a viewpoint that can have an opinion.

>“I apologize, I was wool gathering.” She snickered.//

I don't understand how she could do that in the middle of a conversation, and one that's still too new for her to have lost interest in already.

>sky,” Star Bright struggled to get the last word out.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>immediately found themselves on the floor. Star Bright immediately//

More close repetition, and you're falling into the rut of all the sentences in this paragraph starting the same again.

>What does the Canterlot Astronomical Society need to send me a letter for,//

Isn't that a question?

>Starry can invent a new type of star, it said, you can’t even get a book published.//

That quoted thought would be a comma splice.

>she…” he let the rest of the sentence trail off.//

The ellipsis already means he trailed off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>“That,” Star Bright continued. “Was//

Here's a spot where it sounds more like the quote would be one continuous sentences instead of starting another at "was."

>took a gulped it down//

Jumbled wording.

>The pegasus flew into the next room while the unicorn//

These are also getting to be very overused descriptors, plus I can never keep straight which is which to be able to tell them apart.

>“How can I say no to a friend,” //

Isn't that a question?

>whinney//

I've only ever seen that spelled "whinny."

>now empty//

Hyphenate.

>now stretched painfully thin//

That's a close repetition with the previous "now," and you've got an opinion creeping into the narration again.

>Okay, he thought, plan B. Just tell him, he thought, just get it out of the way.//

Repetitive speech tags.

>He went to work preparing the muffin and wrapping it up, flew into the living room, slowing his speed as he turned the corner.//

You must be missing a conjunction before the "flew" action.

>Silver Script returned with kiss with one of his own//

Typo.

>flanking each side//

Redundant.

>Another unicorn approached the couple.//

Repetitive with what the previous character did.

>Star Bright took a step forward, and pointed a hoof to himself.//

You don't need that comma. It's just a compound verb.

>floor to ceiling//

Hyphenate.

>He leaned over//

There's been a lot of leaning in this chapter.

>Idiot, he thought, facehoofing, he doesn’t know.//

That's rather harsh. He should know whether he's ever mentioned it before. And since he knows he hasn't, how does he expect Silver to figure it out? That's not something he'd reasonably intuit.

It's kind of interesting to see the change in Star. He's confident right now because he's the one who knows his way around Canterlot. In that sense, it's reasonable that he's forgotten his fear of making a speech, though I hope you'll have him remember at some point and give an appropriate reaction.

>as Silver Script’s gaze toured the room, his eyes getting wider and wider as his jaw continued its slow descent//

It's pretty clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence, and they tend to fight each other for the sentence's timeline.

>first time//

Hyphenate.

>either unaware or ignoring the stallion’s current state of mind//

As I've noted before, you're primarily using an omniscient narrator so I'm going to assume that's what you want. This is closer to being from a character perspective. Someone who's omniscient would know which this is by definition. He wouldn't have to give an ambiguous choice.

>Los Pegasus Review//

>Cloudsdale Chronicle//
>The Manehattaner//
Newspaper titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized. I wasn't sure whether you intended "The" to be part of the official name of either of the first two, but if so, include it as well.

>widest reaching//

Hyphenate.

>pegasi market//

Noun adjuncts are singular, even if the term is plural. For instance, you say "ham sandwiches," not "hams sandwiches." So this would just be "pegasus."

>The sound of glass shattering hit the bedroom floor//

This says the sound hit the floor.

>the glass figurine//

The way you refer to this it's like I should know what figurine you're talking about, but you haven't mentioned one before now.

>Silver Script stared at the wall//

What's the point of a scene break here? You haven't changed time, place, perspective, or anything else.

>matter of factly//

Hyphenate.

>Caliper nodded, his horn glowed, and the pieces of the statue floating into the air.//

The verb form "floating" doesn't work with the syntax. There's some pretty repetitive wording in this paragraph, too. You use some form of "float" twice and "pieces" three times.

>She gleaned over her clipboard//

Are you sure that's the word you mean? I've never heard "glean" used in that sense.

>Silver Script nodded, but didn’t speak. Raven turned to Caliper and nodded//

Repetitive nodding.

>She turned her attention to Star Bright.//

This is pretty redundant with the fact she uses direct address with him.

>“I could write it!”//

Why the hell didn't Star think of this long ago? I mean, his husband is a writer. Is he really so clueless that it would never occur to him ask Silver to do something that he does as a very serious hobby/aspiring career? Star's holding a massive idiot ball here.

>I need the alone time//

Why is he using "the" instead of "some" here? This is the kind of strange phrasing you hear from Starfire on Teen Titans. And why isn't Silver upset that Star had never considered asking him to write the speech?

>S… s…//

Presuming that this is Silvy that he's trying to say, capitalize all those instances of it. It's a name, so it has to be capitalized.

>rest his head against the door//

rested

>knowing there was a purpose to the landscaping, though never quite able to figure out exactly what it was//

Then how does he know? Did someone tell him? Or he just assumes there is?

>do?//

Include the question mark in the italics.

>The Trenderhoof//

Extraneous word.

>I am actually here looking for an astrophysicist named Star Bright.//

Huh? He writes travel articles. Why's he doing an interview of nothing having to do with travel? You could have just made up an OC here. I don't know what it adds to have it be Trenderhoof specifically, and it doesn't make sense.

>says that if Star Bright isn’t in the cage,” he said, making air quotes. “He’s probably hiding. They said//

Since he uses "says" and "said" in the dialogue, it's pretty repetitive to have "said" also be your speaking verb.

>“...yes?”//

This isn't picking up a sentence left suspended earlier, so capitalize it.

>He glanced over at the castle door, praying that Silver Script would come and rescue him.//

The last "he" mentioned was the guard, so this sounds like it still refers to him.

I'm seeing very few speaking verbs other than "said" and the occasional "asked." Often, we have the other problem, that authors aren't using "said" enough and are relying on too many unusual ones. This tends to steal attention away from the dialogue. But you're pretty extreme. Toss in a more interesting one every so often.

>He then began//

>He then turned//
Repetitive beginning to consecutive narrative sentences.

>Sorry I didn’t realize what was happening and I was just trying to get to know the stallion who wanted to interview me.//

Huh? He's not allowed to talk to other stallions? You're pressing the limits of credibility here.

>The wind rustled the leaves and an owl hooted in the distance.//

Needs a comma.

>the cage?//

Include the question mark in the italics.

>they were teleported//

Twilight said way back in the series pilot that teleportation was pretty hard. And Star hasn't been depicted as someone particularly gifted in magic.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3152

>>3151
>Star Bright tapped the call button on the elevator, and moments later, a single bell rang out, and the elevator doors opened with a quiet whoosh. The two stallions stepped in, and the doors closed. The unicorn tapped the button for the basement, and Silver Script immediately felt himself drop.//
This is about as bland as a paragraph could be. You could have said, "They took the elevator down," and I could have intuited that all this other stuff would have happened exactly as you stated it. If you're going to add detail, make it mean something. You just have obvious, empty filler here.

>“You weren’t kidding when you called this the cage.”//

How does he say this before he even sees it? The door doesn't open until the next paragraph.

>flanked either side//

Redundant. That's what "flanked" means.

>He glanced at the unicorn beside him, enjoying the way he had cast a spell to block the kiss from his view.//

Why were they cheering if they didn't see it? And why does he care?

>the Manehattaner//

Underline or italicize, and last time you had "the" capitalized as if it were part of the name.

>a note//

That's not really an instrument. You might want to mention it after what it's attached to so that the list makes sense for what prompted it before the colon.

Ah, a villanelle. One of my favorite poetic forms. You've almost got a regular syllable count, though not a regular meter. Of course, neither is required for a villanelle, but since you're so close to the former, I didn't know if you were trying for such. Most lines have 7 syllables, but some have 6 or 8.

>"And you just made that up on the spot?"//

He really came up with something as structurally demanding as a villanelle off the top of his head? I don't buy it. For Zecora, maybe, but not here. What would you lose if this just happened to be something he'd written a while back but remembered? And then it's far more realistic.

>get out of your manes so you can get back to work,” Star Bright said. “We need to get//

Three uses of "get" in just two sentences.

>to to castle//

Typo.

>Why did he make it sound like he was talking to me,//

That's a question, right?

>He lay his head//

You have a direct object, so use "laid."

>jealous.” He said//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>dropped. He reached a hoof to his chest as he felt his heart drop//

Close repetition.

>“How else could you have meant it?”//

This is a rather manufactured drama. Both of these guys are awfully thin-skinned.

>How could you do that,//

I don't know why you won't punctuate all these questions with question marks.

>he thought as he tried to think//

That sounds kind of contradictory.

>let Silver Script let//

Close repetition.

>clearly unimpressed//

>saw clearly//
Repetitive to have these in consecutive sentences, but it's also a narrative opinion creeping in again, which doesn't work for an omniscient narrator. To whom are these clear?

>“What’s wrong with your wing?” he asked//

Who asks this? I can't tell whether it's Trenderhoof or Star.

>plucking out his remaining feathers//

These guys didn't come across as the type to do this. Not only is it completely tactless, it's also probably criminal. You can't just go and start yanking someone's hair in public.

>he saw//

You have this exact phrase 3 times in the paragraph.

>“You were taking so long,” Trenderhoof said with a soft laugh. “That we ordered for you.”//

You do this a lot, where it makes more sense for the two parts of the quote to make a single sentence, yet you've chopped them into two. I've seen far fewer where you made the mistake in the opposite direction. Essentially, he says:
“You were taking so long. That we ordered for you.”
More likely, he says:
“You were taking so long that we ordered for you.”
Then it would look like this:
“You were taking so long,” Trenderhoof said with a soft laugh, “that we ordered for you.”
I finally commented on it, but I've seen you do this in all the chapters so far.

>flipped the table over//

What the hell? Besides sounding like a lazy meme reference, what'd be the point of this? He's punishing the restaurant for something that has nothing to do with them.

>“Well, you see…” Silver Script began but let his sentence trail off.//

Redundant.

>The pair of unicorns began to circle him, the flickering lights causing their shadows to disappear and reappear around him.//

Okay, so this is a dream?

Ah, it is a dream. I'm not sure it's worth having this come as a surprise. If I knew from the start it was one, it wouldn't be any less powerful, and it'd head off all these suspension of disbelief issues. But that's up to you.

>your highness//

That's an honorific. It would be capitalized.

>Reached reached//

I think you meant one of those to be his name.

>he obediently laid down//

lay

>month,” The pegasus continued//

Capitalization. You also use "massage" 6 times in the first couple screens of this chapter .

>“How did you—” Star Bright began, but was cut off//

This is similar to the deal with the ellipsis. The dash already means he go cut off, so you son't need to narrate it as well.

>castle!//

>dungeon?//
Include the punctuation in the italics.

>What has gotten into you,//

It's a question, so make it one.

>uncharted territory//

They're married, right? How is this uncharted?

>agreement,” She began//

Capitalization.

>back to back//

Hyphenate.

>you?//

Include the question mark in the italics.

>The outside facade of the Silver Frames Art Museum didn’t look particularly inviting. In fact, when compared to the surrounding establishments, it looked downright intimidating//

You've got opinions creeping into your narration again, so you're breaking from an omniscient viewpoint.

>Silver Script paused for a moment before slowly turning his head back to Star Bright, whose head was now turned up to the sky//

>Star Bright’s gaze turned to face him, but immediately turned away again.//
Close repetition of "turn" in each sentence, and these sentences are even close together, so you have 4 of them over just 3 paragraphs.

>his muzzle against his//

A lot of these descriptions and actions get ambiguous, including the ones where you use "the stallion," since it could apply to either, ad there's not always enough context to sort it out quickly.

>“It is my duty to ensure that your trip through town goes smoothly.//

You didn't close those quotation marks.

>guard gaze//

Missing possessive.

>indifferent expression, the only difference//

This still creates a repetitive sound, even if they're not close to each other in meaning.

>Silver Script ignored the ponies who were attempting to approach them//

That's kind of an awkward way to bring up what these other ponies are doing. And why are they doing it?

>the pre-recorded script ended.//

You might need to do something to delineate these better, or put the mention of the recording before what it says instead of after. It keeps appearing to be dialogue, and I have trouble figuring out who says it, and then after the fact I see it's the recording. It's a little confusing.

>on the altar//

I would have expected "at" the altar, but if this is an expression you're used to, it's fine.

>structure?//

Include the question mark in the italics.

Okay, this chapter is getting bogged down in lengthy descriptions of what these architectural designs mean. For one thing, most readers aren't going to care, and it's not even important to the plot to get this much detail. For another, you're trying to convey something visual, and as subjective as artistic interpretation is, you're never going to give the reader an accurate enough text description to really link the artistry to its appearance.

>The Tasty Treat//

You've been inconsistent in capitalizing "the."

>turning back to the couple//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>The two stallions shrugged//

I don't get the shrug. What sentiment are they expressing? Her actions shouldn't be a mystery to them.

>You wouldn’t know them.//

They wouldn't know two Elements who'd saved the world numerous times and had a bestselling journal about them published?

>Did I introduce him to Silvy,//

It's a question.

>stallions shoulder//

Missing apostrophe.

>assistant?//

Include the question mark in the italics.

>Fancy Pants had managed a seat to the interview in order to report to the local news//

Why's someone like him doing journalism?

>The Manehattener//

Underline or italicize the title.

>Trenderhoof leaned in and rest his hoof on the pony’s knee.//

The verb form of "rest" is off, and I've cheated by looking ahead and seeing that there's quite a bit of leaning going on in this chapter, too.

>Has he always called me his partner,//

It's a question.

>This is too much, Silver Script thought, I can’t let him do this anymore.//

If you took out the attribution, the two quote parts would form a comma splice.

>husband!//

Include the exclamation mark in the italics.

>Silver Script could hear the sounds of chairs scratching the courtyard as ponies stood up and backed as far away as possible//

This is in the castle. No guards are coming over to head off a rapidly developing incident?

>mine!//

Include the exclamation mark in the italics.

So even the princesses are there? And nobody's going to intervene when a heated altercation starts?

>star studded//

Hyphenate.

>with an expression on her face even he couldn’t identify//

The "even" makes it sound like he's an expert at interpreting expressions or something, but I have no reason to think he is.

>so that he could he//

Typo.

>the two stallions simply rest//

Why'd you go to present tense?

>The pair were interrupted by a gentle coughing, and immediately separated, Star Bright looked down and pawed at the ground while Silver Script scratched the back of his neck.//

That second comma is a comma splice.

>the bat ponies in front of the podium began playing the Equestrian Anthem on their horns.//

Maybe a little odd that he didn't notice them until now.

>“Thank you, Equestria,” He said//

Capitalization.

>He waited until the crowd quieted before beginning.//

But he already said something. He's not exactly beginning.

>looked up to his husband, who was now looking//

Close repetition.

>“Since antiquity,” Star Bright began.//

And many paragraphs later, he's beginning again?

>Silver Script beamed with pride at the pun//

It kind of loses something if you have to point out that it was one.

>whispering about why they were asked to come there.//

This is unnecessary, as in the very next line, Silver goes on to do just that.

>The Manehattener//

Italicize.

>much to small//

Too/to confusion.

>back and gave Silver Script a wink before turning around and disappearing back//

>before,” she said before//
Close repetition.

>The center of gravity of our love is everywhere.//

I'm not sure what he means by that. As a matter of physics, no, a center of gravity is always at a single point.

I see lots of complaints around the fandom that there's a short supply of good M/M romance. It's not something I normally read, so I can't say whether that's true, but I do think you have a good story here. It gets a bit sappy and simplistic at times, and the two behave in rather childish ways for married adults, but whether that's problematic depends on the story. This is close to show tone than something more serious, so despite the comments I left to that effect, that's not something you need to change. Were you to try writing some original fiction with the goal of getting it published, then there's more of my advice here that I'd press you on, but that isn't necessary.

The main things I do want to see you work on a bit are fixing the mechanical things, the repetition, and working on the perspective, where there were a few slips into a limited narration. There's not a lot of work to be done, and I've pretty much laid it all out for you, so I hope that makes it easier. I'd like to post this, and when you're ready, resubmit and mark it as "back from Mars" so I know it only needs a spot-check of the edits.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3161

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Kind of bold to do an in medias res here. One of the big emotional moments would be Twilight seeing the filly appear and realizing what she was, but you're skipping all that. It can work, but I'm hoping that conflict's of a different nature so it doesn't matter your forgoing some obvious engagement,

>but it only turned more probably the more she thought about it.//

probable

>it has always has been//

Extraneous word.

>Whatever choices she has made or events that have happened must always happen, else a paradox would arise.//

I can't really parse this sentence. I think the syntax is off. Plus I can't figure out why it's in present tense.

>and how exactly whoever was responsible for this, had obtained the power and means//

There's no reason to have that comma. I also don't understand Twilight's conclusions. She's decided that the filly wanted to come here or someone sent her intentionally. Couldn't this just be an accident? Or some natural phenomenon?

>However, she herself was of the future, albeit one that no longer has meaning.//

Switching verb tenses again.

>W-Where//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway, like a name.

>nodding assuredly at the filly//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

> scholarly.” She said//

Punctuation/capitalization. You got it right earlier in the paragraph, so I don't know why you're getting it wrong here.

>patting her on the filly on the back//

Extraneous words.

>A mundane chore like that came off as perfectly choreographed performance akin to a fireworks display.//

You'd been in adult Twilight's perspective so far, but here, you switch to filly Twilight. Until you get comfortable with how to do a perspective shift and whether doing so is justified, it's better to keep to a single perspective in each scene.

>chore” she admitted//

Missing punctuation.

>Filly Twilight noted the slight twitches on the older mare’s face, but paid it no mind. The thought of becoming as focused and precise as the mare in front of her was nothing short of awe-inspiring.//

Here, you're popping into the filly's perspective again. So far, you've never stayed there more than a single paragraph, and we don't learn anything essential while there, so there really isn't a need to shift the viewpoint.

>exactly?” Her past self asked//

Captialization.

>Oh...right//

Needs a space after the ellipsis.

>my sister is taking the exam later this week//

Wait, what? Twilight has a sister?

>it’s pipes rusted//

Its/it's confusion.

>Her eyes squeezed shut as the tears fell in vain, staining her fading body as she bawled it all out.//

Try not to be structurally repetitive, like the two "as" clauses you have here. Because they also set a sentence's timeline, they're also kind of fighting each other.

>The door swung inward to revealing the dusty floor//

Typo.

>She took scope of all it//

Missing word.

>Thank you Mayor Mare.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

The perspective is unsteady in this chapter, too. It starts with the Mayor, then quickly goes to Twilight within the first page.

>I can’t...” Twilight trailed off as she surveyed the place again..//

The ellipsis already means she trailed off. Narrating it as well is redundant. And you have an extra period at the end.

>Mare on the moon//

Mare in the Moon

>every shelve and surface//

shelf

>the clouds we still off in the distance//

Typo.

>as she cleaned, humming a tune to herself as she reflected on the friends she had made here in Ponyville//

Repetitive "as" clauses again.

>nothing beat having real friends around to talk too//

To/too confusion.

>“What was that?” She asked as if hoping somepony might answer here//

Capitalization, typo.

>She reached hoof//

Missing word.

>quick.Why//

Missing space.

>herself- no//

>She saw Waning Star- no//
Please use a proper dash.

>turned corner//

Missing word.

>Twilight brought a hoof to mouth//

Missing word.

>Holding them back for so long in spite of her impending existential unravelling, was a feat in and of itself//

No reason to have that comma.

>I am..was//

Looks like that was supposed to be an ellipsis?

>continue to live on in her? ”//

Extraneous space after the question mark.

>layers of dust that bedded it’s surface//

Its/it's confusion.

>I hope so very much”//

Missing period.

>It faintly smelled of ink//

You just used "faint" a few sentences ago. It's repetitive to use it again so soon.

>This is my last letter to you Celestia.//

>Why didn’t you wake me up Twilight?//
Missing comma for direct address.

>I can-”//

Use a proper dash.

I do wonder how all this is supposed to fit in with canon events of where all the girls were when Twilight took her test, but then you have it marked AU, so you can place them wherever you like.

There'a very interesting idea here, but it does need a lot of editing help. I couldn't even note everything. I got most of the technical things, but there are also plenty of places where the phrasing just sounds off, and it's going to take an editor going through it in detail to help you iron all that out. If you can, it's definitely a unique take on events, and it could be a pretty engaging story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3171

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>who sounded like they were in discord//

That's a pretty odd phrasing.

>Since Kamino laid only a short distance from Bluegrass//

lay

>took her time to take//

Close repetition.

>But don't get your hopes up about any of them Violet.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>we often go out and eat at the ice-cream parlor, if you want to you can join us there in the weekend!//

Comma splice.

>Maybe this could change now. This could be her great chance to finally form some friendships.//

This just comes across as bland, and that's a problem with the narration in general. You're telling things from Violet's mindset. If you thought you had an opportunity to get somehting you really wanted, wouldn't you sound excited? Yet the narration just says it here with no emotion. It doesn't sound like Violet cares much about it. The whole point of using a limited narrator is to give your character a very personal voice, but you're not using it.

>lancing over towards Rose—who smiled back at her—her body calmed down.//

This says her body glanced over.

>Violet thought “I'm not gonna write down anything anyway”//

Needs commas to set off the dialogue.

>It was kinda awkward for her to search these three, especially Rose, so much on this day.//

Strange phrasing.

>Kick it up one last notch everypony!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>While she was in hospital, her parents arranged for her to move to Kamino and rented her a small house on the edge of the city while they were off doing business around the world.//

It feels unnatural to have two "while" clauses in the sentence, plus they're fighting each other for the sentence's timeline.

>The previous owner left barely any furniture and a sheet of dust had already settled in when Violet first entered her new home.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>most walls facing the outside were made up of mostly//

Repetitive word choice.

>None of this made sense to her, so emotions of joy mixed with uncertainty, and ultimately fear.//

So those emotions what? And instead of listing those emotions, give me symptoms of them so I can figure out on my own what they are.

>the pony that had saved her earlier//

When talking about intelligent creatures, it's preferred to use "who" over "that" or "which."

>Apparently Violet mumbled without noticing it first.//

But right after this, she does say it. I'm confused.

>decorated with few abstract paintings//

Seems like you're missing an "a," or else this tends to say Violet would have expected more paintings than there were.

>If you like and feel like it//

Strange phrasing, and kind of repetitive. Just one of those is fine. You don't need both.

>It is pretty tempting don't you think?//

Needs a comma.

>erratic movements//

That's pretty vague. What does she actually do? And here's another spot where Violet should be quite emotional, yet her narrative tone sounds bland.

>Taking a deep breath//

Set off participial phrases like this with a comma.

>whenever you want to become a Sorceress//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

>now.As//

Missing space.

>I didn't think you'd actually join as//

Typo.

>Despite knowing this, she did not want to admit anything of the sort, not even to herself.//

The narration is essentially her thoughts, and it said so explicitly, so she very much has admitted it to herself.

>Even though our main targets are the witches//

Needs a comma here for the dependent clause.

>That's a different story entirely, let's just go after the witch for now.//

Comma splice.

>Whenever I fight one of them//

Needs a comma here.

>All muscles in her body tense up//

Why'd you switch to present?

>anymore.“That's//

Missing space.

>And we would never force you to become a Sorceress if you don't want to, we just wanted to show you the door.//

Comma splice.

>slowly walked away, her hoofsteps slower//

Close repetition.

>An ebb and flow of happiness and subtle terror//

You're directly naming emotion again.

>On the outskirts of Kamino laid relics of ancient villages.//

Lay/lie confusion. They're tough verbs to keep straight. Short version is you need "lay" instead of "laid" when there's not an object being laid down.

>decelerated in its descend//

descent

>the civilian pony//

What are you differentiating "civilian" from? The girls aren't government employees or anything.

>Turning around, no immediate way back out could be seen anymore.//

This says that no way out turned around.

>now spreading//

Hyphenate.

>They counted somewhere between seventy and a hundred.//

That's a rather large number to be able to estimate so quickly, and yet have such a large error band.

>Violet immediately threw herself on the ground and shielded her face, her body trembling.//

Here's another paragraph that sounds very stoic for what iolet's going through. That's the only major thing holding your story up.

>Reaching the apex of her jump//

You'll normally set off participial phrases with a comma.

>Releasing the shot, the magical arrow zoomed forwards//

This says the arrow released the shot.

>around the bridge. Rose turned around//

Watch the close word repetition.

>You can get up now Violet.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>barrier.” Amber said//

Punctuation.

>Giant images of various tapestries hushed over the walls//

I can't imagine "hushed" is the word you meant to use here. I don't even know what it would mean in this context.

>the walls, folding around the walls//

More close repetition.

>Scattered around the field laid common objects//

You need "lay" here again.

>form. Its form//

Close repetition.

>Amber if you'd let me//

>go ahead Rose//
>Don't worry Violet//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>her?She//

Missing space.

>After having traversed about half the distance, the witch's head sprouted rose flowers//

This says that the head traversed the distance.

You're sure using "conjured" a lot during this fight.

>And even then he didn't even seem to realize I was there, he looked right through me.//

Comma splice.

>a whim of her parent's//

She has more than one parent, right?

>looking for more words. She had looked//

Close repetition.

At this point, it's going to take me forever to go through the whole story in detail, and I'm mostly finding the same problems over and over again. The point is for you to learn how to fix them on your own, not have me fix them for you, so I'm just going to read the rest of the story without further comment, then come back at the end to say if I found any plot or characterization problems.

In chapter 4, I don't understand this: "It was still too early in the day for them to attack any ponies." I haven't watched Magica Madoka, but is there really something in there where witches can't attack early in the day?

>thing,” while grasping for Rose's hoof, Violet tossed her head from side to side to look for a path away from the Walpurgisnacht, “we//

You have a non-speaking action you're trying to use as a speech tag. It seems like you want to use a narrative aside here. This is how to format one:
thing—” while grasping for Rose's hoof, Violet tossed her head from side to side to look for a path away from the Walpurgisnacht “—we

You're using "salve" when I think you mean "salvo."

In chapter 5, Violet says she has the ability to skip back in time to getting out of the hospital again. So why doesn't she do that when Amber gets killed? She could have stopped it from happening. That's what she already did for Rose.

Okay, so she does after Rose dies again. But I wonder why she never did after Amber's death.

The editing's gotten noticeably worse in chapter 7. There are numerous slips into present tense and several places where you're missing a space between words.

>Hardly any pony would care if this bridge was suddenly destroyed//

That's just really, really hard to believe.

I'm noticing more editing problems than usual in chapter 11.

In chapter 14, I get this:
>a singular tear//
That is one of the most cliched things you possibly could have said.

Yeah, the editing did noticeably decline the further in I got.

All told, I like the characters, but then I don't know how close a match this is for the show, since I've never seen it. Most of what I know about it comes from the one or two other crossovers I've read. It's interesting how Violet becomes the complete opposite of her original personality over the course of the story.

So, all the things I mentioned in detail over the first few chapters was present through the whole thing. You need to work on the editing, and the narration is pretty bland during emotionally intense moments, considering you're using a limited narrator who takes on characters' identities.

Even if you fixed all that, there's a subtle problem here: why is this an MLP story? There's nothing pony about it. You could make these characters human, and the only thing you'd have to do is a search-and-replace of hoof/hand, mane/hair, etc. You wouldn't have to rewrite the characters, setting, or plot. It doesn't matter that they're ponies, it's immaterial to the plot, and it doesn't even come up very much.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3174

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Chapter 1:

>W-Well, it there’s anything I can do for you//

Only capitalize the irst part of a stutter, and you have a typo there.

>um…I’ll//

It tends to format better on FiMFic if you leave a space after an ellipsis, especially if you use a program that auto-converts three dots to a single ellipsis character.

>And her eyes…their soft raspberry-red hue contrasted perfectly with the rest of her, giving them a captivating look.//

Note two things here. First, this expresses opinion in the narration (perfectly, captivating). Second, the ellipsis makes this sound very conversational, like dialogue. That combines into making this a limited narration in Ticket Stub's perspective. But it doesn't stay there. Only a couple of pages in, Ticket Stub leaves, and the perspective moves over to Sonata. It's usually not a good idea to change perspective in the middle of a scene anyway, but it's really strange to start the story in a perspective that will soon be abandoned and is an unimportant character. I'd be surprised if he even turns up again.

>the red-horned unicorn//

Keep in mind what this means to the perspective. This is Sonata choosing to call him this in her own thoughts. Do you do that with people you know well? Do you think of your grandfather as "the gray-haired man"?

>An exasperated expression//

You outright name emotions a fair amount. Think about how you could tell that someone you saw in public was exasperated. You wouldn't know he was automatically. You'd have to interpret the context of what he's doing and how he looks. It's more authentic when written characters mimic this real-life effect.

>Two months ago Equestria had been the victim of what had since become known as “elemental bleeds”; instances of the heretofore-unknown Elemental Planes superimposing themselves over patches of Equestria.//

You should be able to replace a semicolon with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but they wouldn't here. You're making a definition or clarification, so use a colon.

>“Aww, I bet it’ll be fine,” smiled Sonata.//

How do you smile dialogue?

>how…” Lex trailed off//

The ellipsis already means he trails off. Narrating it as well is redunant. You use this speech tag nearly very time you have an ellipsis.

>Unaware of the nonplussed expression on her boyfriend’s face//

And now you've drifted to Lex's perspective. That's the third one in the scene already.

>Much to her chagrin, he hadn’t noticed//

And now you're back in Sonata's head. The perspective is incredibly unsteady in this story.

Chapter 2:

>So why,” he lifted the pair of boarding passes in his telekinetic grip, waving them in Sonata’s face, “do we have tickets//

You've punctuated/capitalized his like it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb. It sounds like you're trying to do a narrative aside. Here's how:
So why—” he lifted the pair of boarding passes in his telekinetic grip, waving them in Sonata’s face “—do we have tickets

>A look of incomprehension spread across Sonata’s face.//

Besides being very blunt with the emotion again, look at it from Sonata's perspective. She's held the viewpoint in the chapter so far, but how can she see her own face to say this?

>Tale to-//

Please use proper dashes, not hyphens, for interruptions and asides.

>He doubted it would be that easy, since it was likely that Tall Tale had experienced their own problems.//

And now you're in Lex's head.

This is a rather big thing, that he would be granted part of Equestria to rule, but it's just... there. I have no idea how or why this occurred.

>Sonata blinked as Lex looked at her with an inscrutable expression. She was about to ask him if something was wrong, when he leaned towards her, giving her just enough time to feel surprised before he kissed her gently.//

And now you're back in Sonata's viewpoint.

>They had confessed their feelings for each other only a few days ago//

I hope we'll get to some of their backstory eventually. It's a lot to expect the reader to just get invested in this relationship because you say they're in love. You have to demonstrate that. If I don't know why they love each other, what they like about each other, what they each give and take from a relationship, then I'm not going to care much about it.

>Much to his surprise, the stallion was reading the paper intently//

And you've gone to Ticket Stub's viewpoint now, and it only stays there a couple paragraphs.

Chapter 3:

I'll obviously never get through the story if I keep up that level of detail throughout. For the next few chapters, I'm only gong to note new issues I see, and then I'm going to start skimming just to get a flavor for how the plot and characterization go.

>She stumbled on the unfamiliar word, trying to sound it out.//

Why do you feel the need to explain this? Don't you trust the reader to figure out what's going on?

>evidence that his anger had not abated//

And again. It's like you're afraid the reader won't pick up on something unless you spell it out explicitly.

>His eyes had changed back to normal though, indicating that he was finally getting his temper under control.//

Again, you're over-explaining things, but it's also repetitive to keep using the same indicator for it.

>‘kay?//

Note that smart quotes will make leading apostrophes backward. You'll often have to force it the right way by pasting one in.

Chapter 4:

>Kicking her way free of her blankets, Sonata unsteadily climbed to her feet.//

You do this from time to time. Note that a participle synchronizes with the action it's attached to, so she kicks out of the blanket while climbing to her feet. More likey, she'd kick free before standing. You have to be careful when you use participles that you actually do want the actions happening simultaneously. Sometimes it doesn't make sense for them to. In fact, you do this again later in the same paragraph:
>Rushing to the door, she stepped out into the hallway//
Then again just one sentence later:
>Pushing past them, she hurried to Lex’s room, throwing the door open.//
She couldn't open his door until after she'd rushed there.

>His brow furrowed in thought, not answering immediately.//

Another problem with participles is that they can be misplaced modifiers or dangling modifiers. This is one of the latter. Presumably, Lex is the one who's supposed to be "not answering," but he doesn't even appear in the sentence. This says his brow wasn't answering. You have this problem occasionally.

>The responses came from Sonata and the engineer came in chorus//

That wording got jumbled.

For all that you keep mentioning Lex is the only pony fit to rule all of Equestria, I have no idea what's going on. I know you want the story to stand alone well, but I feel like I'm missing lots of context.

Chapter 15:

>Because Sonata’s back was turned to her, she couldn’t see the wolfish smile on Kara’s face.//

But if Sonata's the perspective character, then the narrator can't tell me things she doesn't know or perceive. This is a little bit of a different problem with perspective than the ones you'd been having earlier.

In chapter 20, when the spiders have attacked and gone, Nosey is wandering around town and talks to Sonata. But the last time we saw her, Lex was telling her his story. This just leaves me confused about where Lex is now.

Chapter 23:

>Nodded back to her//

Typo.

Chapter 25 is basically one solid block of exposition. It's rather tedious to read.

In chapter 26, it's pretty cliched to have one of these "as you already know" exposition by dialogue sessions.

What are these italicized paragraphs? Flashbacks? It's just confusing.

Chapter 28:

>Quietly climbing to his hooves, Lex quietly//

Another spot of close repetition. I might as well flag these when I see them, but at the speed I'm reading, I won't catch many.

Chapter 31:

>Barely noticing Fireflower running behind her, Lex’s entire world came to a halt as he saw her//

Just another example of a dangling participle. I've seen others. This says his world barely noticed Fireflower.

>“Rockwood’s right,” Breezyleaf looked like she wanted to cry//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

Chapter 32:

Just because you have a character doesn't mean it adds something to inhabit his perspective. That's the case here. I don't see what we learn of value in this chapter. He's not someone we'e supposed to care about, and there's no important information we get from him that couldn't have come from someone else.

Chapter 33:

More of these italicized paragraphs that are supposed to be flashbacks. They're confusing. At first, they look like they're character thoughts. Flashbacks typically deserve to be separate scenes, but then they'd need to be longer than these.

What these changes of perspective also mean is that you're constantly going over the same events 2 or 3 times. There can be value in showing different interpretations of the same thing, but that's not exactly what you're doing. That'd be more like if two witnesses to a crime remembered it differently. Here, you don't give me anything new from each perspective. They both describe the same events in the same way. And you do this often enough that I'm spending a significant amount of time rereading the same things multiple times.

Chapter 36:

>starting to bubble slightly, heating up enough that it was actually starting//

Watch the close repetition.

Chapter 39:

>Sonata laid on the ground//

Lay

>Lifting it, the hole suddenly turned back into a piece of cloth. //

This says the hole lifted it.

Chapter 43:

>Holding it in his telekinetic grip//

See how you start 4 paragraphs in a row with a participial phrase? That gets pretty repetitive.

>still laying where it had fallen//

lying

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3175

>>3174
Chapter 44:

>The goddess was far larger than himself//

Reflexive pronouns are for when the same person or thing is the subject.

>thaumaturty//

Typo, I believe.

>whom it was//

That's actually a situation where "who" is correct.

>the Night Mare’s had been displeased//

Why is that a possessive?

>of whom Lex was mostly sure had been the subject of that carving//

The "of whom" should just be "who."

Chapter 45:

>He named his remaining request then//

Authors love to do this kind of thing, but they fail to consider whether it works with the perspective. The scene is in Lex's viewpoint. The narration is his thoughts. He knows what he asks for, so why isn't it in the narration? There has to be a motivation for the narrator to avoid mentioning it, and the convenience of creating tension doesn't count. He has zero motivation to avoid mentioning it in his own head, so he has zero motivation to avoid letting the reader know here. It would work from a perspetive that didn't know what he'd asked, and it might work in an omniscient narration, depending on how it's handled. But it doesn't work with the perspective you've chosen.

Chapter 46:

>Sonata laid down beside her boyfriend//

Lay

>Yawning again//

You're in that rut again. Of the scene's 7 paragraphs, 4 start with a participle.

>well played Night Mare//

Missing a comma for direct address.

Chapter 47:

>you know…” he turned slightly red, “to//

Use the aside formatting I discussed earlier.

>he was loathe to do that//

The adjective form is "loath."

>this,” he gestured to Severance, “here//

Aside formatting again.

Chapter 49:

>I love you so much, Sonata.//

He's known her for, what, a few days?

Chapter 51:

Look at these repetitive paragraph beginnings right at the top of the chapter:
>Turning away from where they were embracing in a tangle//
>Pausing as she reached the threshold//
>Turning away//

>He knew that there was no way that a flimsy wooden door could feasibly contain an artifact-weapon forged by a goddess, but he’d be damned if he had to let the thing witness private moments between himself and his beloved, let alone interject its opinion.//

The chapter had been in Sonata's perspective until here.

>Sonata wasn’t sure what made her think that the weapon was a “he.”//

And in the very next paragraph, you're back to Sonata.

Chapter 52:

>between Sonata and I//

That's actually a spot for "me." You wouldn't say "between we," but that's the same thing as "between Sonata and I."

>Lex grit his teeth//

Past tense is "gritted."

It strikes me that since they defeated the dragon, there's very little momentum to the story. Nobody's really struggling for anything, and there's no developing conflict.

In Chapter 58, I don't see what the purpose of the last scene is.

>Canterlot Chronicle//

Newspaper titles should be underlined or (preferably) italicized. This goes for the ones you mention later, too.

Chapter 60:

>“It is my royal duty, sister,”//

When used as terms of address, family relations, get capitalized.

>pony that was having a nightmare//

It's preferred to use "who" over "that" or "which" when referring to an intelligent being.

Even skimming, I'm only getting through about 10 chapters a day, and it's going to be forever before I get a reply to you. So I'm going to have to pick up the pace and just try to get the most basic picture of each chapter. Inevitably, I'll miss things, but I did want to be able to give you some feedback on whether the overall plot makes sense. It means I'll barely catch any detailed stuff, though.

Chapter 75:

>But as loathe as he was//

You're using the verb spelling "loathe" where you need the adjective spelling "loath."

Chapter 76:

>the edge of his periphery//

That's sure redundant.

The perspective is bouncing around a lot in this fight scene.

Chapter 79:

>The pudgy fish-monster was fairing even better.//

faring

Chapter 80:

So precisely the right scroll fell out of Lex's bag by chance? There's an old guideline about writing that has a lot of truth to it: Coincidence is a fine way for characters to get into trouble. It's a terrible way for them to get out of trouble.

Chapter 87:

>start in surprise//

Redundant.

Chapter 88:

>clearly taken by surprise at Nosey’s request. The newsworthiness of everything they’d gone through hadn’t occurred to her before.//

These are from two different perspectives. The second is obviously Nosey's impression, but the first wouldn't work for her perspective. She'd just know she was surprised. "Clearly" wouldn't enter into it. That's someone else's assessment.

Chapter 91:

>She paused, then added. “That’s the other world we were sent to.”//

Punctuation.

Chapter 95:

>We didn’t know our enemies strength then!//

You have a plural where you need a possessive.

Chapter 96:

>spokepony//

That'd probably be spokespony, like the human-equivalent spokesperson.

Chapter 99:

Some of this battle language gets repetitive. Like you describe a "sickening crunch" twice.

So I apologize for not being able to get through everything. I stopped after chapter 100, because it was getting to be a chore to keep going at it, and it was making you wait an inordinate amount of time for a response.

My main issues are these: The story doesn't stand alone well. I did at least get a sense of who the characters were and why some of this was happening, but I did feel at a big disadvantage for not knowing who Lex is, what he'd gone through to get him to this point, and the world-building involving Everglow. It's not like I can't understand this story's plot—mostly, I do, but a little more on that later. It's that I don't understand what motivates and informs this story's plot.

It doesn't feel like there's a strong overall story arc here. Lex has this lofty, fairly abstract goal of ruling Vanhoover. The synopsis seems to say he wants to rule all of Equestria, though nothing I'd read so far speaks to that. This would seem to be a big concern for Celestia and Luna, except that in 100 chapters, they only show up once, vaguely hint that they have their own machinations, then promptly disappear for dozens of chapters again.

The perspective gets jumpy at times, in two ways. It's fine to change perspective characters at scene breaks, but there are numerous places where you abruptly switch in the middle of a scene, sometimes only for a few sentences, and rather than go into a lenghty description of why that's a bad idea, I'll just refer you to the brief discussion on head hopping at the top of this thread. But back to the times you do confine perspective shifts to scene breaks, you spend quite a bit of time recapping events from the new perspective. Now, I know it's a time-honored thing to show the same scene from multiple perspectives, and it's not that fact that you do so at all that's problematic. It's how often. Many of these times, I don't learn anything useful in the new perspective, or at least not right away, so that some of these retellings could be shortened or cut entirely. (And frequently, something that could be cut or shortened should be cut or shortened.)

And any of the editing issues I had to point out in the first few chapters were present throughout.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3180

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>My injury from the assault course yesterday//

She doesn't say what the injury is. That leaves things pretty vague.

>I stepped inside the elevator and was elevated 18 floors//

Watch the close repetition of "elevator" and "elevated." That's a strange enough use of "elevated" that I'm guessing you did this intentionally, but it's not creating an effect. There's nothing thematic. It feels more like you're trying to be humorous, but she never makes a joke of it, and just as quickly, it's gone, so I'm not sure what you were going for. And 18 is a short enough number that you should write out the word.

>allowing me to walk through the hall down to "Office #467".//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>This wasn't my office but I had been sent an email//

You have numerous places through the story like this, where you need a comma between clauses. You have two subjects, each with its own verb (this wasn't... but I had been...), so put a comma before the conjunction.

>my usual office "Office #20".//

That's a strange repetition of "office."

Wait, why would office 467 be on the 18th floor? Usually the numbering scheme reflects the floor, so I would expect 467 to be on the 4th floor. For that matter, how do they have email? They don't have computers.

>yeah we were that professional we had a mini courtroom installed//

This feels really odd just tacked onto the previous sentence as it is.

>The main disputes that were debated in the courtroom were just petty things like let's say they get a raw brand deal, then they can settle that in our courtroom, of course it occurred to me that these were things that could be settled around a desk not in an EBI courtroom, but I kind of enjoyed the company especially because I had lost touch with the team ever since I graduated so it was always good to catch up.//

Man, that should be several sentences. For one, it's not grammatically correct as a single sentence, but for another, you really can't do this much in a single sentence and expect the reader to keep up with it.

>spinning on chair//

Missing word.

>I've been waiting for you." He said.//

This isn't how to punctuate and capitalize transitions between speech and narration. There's a guide to this at the top of this page.

>it's.....//

3 dots is plenty.

>Well..I..never//

And 2 isn't enough.

>Right on it sir.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>This toy wasn't given a valid reason.//

Do we get to know what the given reason was? Without knowing, it's hard to empathize with her. She may be in denial, or she may have been treated unfairly.

>which he constantly teases me about//

Why did you switch to present tense? You use it several times in this paragraph.

>to the suspicion of Twilight.//

What does Twilight do to make Dash think she's suspicious? Let me see that.

>Was it really that obvious.//

That's a question, right?

>aput//

I don't know what you meant to say here. Maybe "amiss"?

>your being give no work//

you're, given

>"I told you there would be risks when joining law enforcement didn't I?" Twilight said//

Missing period at the end. This also speaks to a lot of the back story that I'd really like to know, as it informs what their relationship is like now. You're glossing over some pretty important things.

>"Where have YOU been?!"//

You already had Twilight speak in this paragraph. Keep to one speaker per paragraph.

>Woah//

Whoa

>Her enthusiasm rocking me.//

This isn't a omplete sentence, and absolute phrases make poor stylistic fragments.

>I paused before realising I should probably clarify something//

Missing period.

>""Bye Rainbow Dash!"I//

Extraneous quotation marks, missing space.

>Think of him as a virtual egghead.//

This is explicitly speaking to an audience. This means Dash is aware of her audience. And this opens up a can of worms. Who's listening? Why? Whay does Dash want to tell her story to this listener? Where are they talking, and when? Unless you're prepared to incorporate all that into your story, it's best to refrain from addressing the reader.

>"Um-D-Dash"//

>"I-It's the v-victim"//
Missing periods.

>just as I start to see how much they really mean to me//

When did this happen? This says there was a big change in her life recently, where she gained a new appreciation for them, but we didn't get to see any of it happen. We don't know what it means to her. We're just assured it's really important, but that's not going to get the reader to identify with her. Demonstration is far more powerful that statement. Let me see this change in their relationship, and it'll mean a lot more.

Chapter 2 just has more of the same problems, so I'm not going to note editing details for it

>now door-less doorway//

>notably annoyed carriage driver//
She's just been informed of Scootaloo's murder, and she's using humor? You need to have a consistent tone here.

>We don't have time to be running around trying to find a crazed killer. We're already up to our necks in paperwork, we simply don't have the manpower.//

Huh? What kind of policeman would ever say something like this? This is completely irresponsible and not plausible.

Dash isn't going to ask Blackhoof about the body in his office? She might keep silent if she feared him, but nothing like that happens.

>I'd forgot I'd been given a suspension the day after the incident.//

What incident? And why? The reader's not going to be engaged in her situation if they don't know.

There are a lot of electronic devices for a story not marked as AU.

This is an interesting idea for a story, and heaven knows there's a lack of good mystery stories around. But the editing needs a lot of work, and you gloss over a lot of the background of what gives the situation its emotional gravity. You may well get to that in future chapters, but you can't string along readers too far before doing so, and you need to give some of it early on just to generate interest in the story. If a reader's not invested in the conflict from the start, they'll drop away from following the story.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3196

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>"Spike?" she yawned again, rubbing an eye with her hoof, "You up yet?"//

That pattern of capitalization and punctuation says the two parts of the quote form a single sentence, but if so, you've stuck a question mark in the middle of it. There's a brief guide to capitalizing and punctuating dialogue at the top of this thread.

>and she had come to assume//

>She had come to notice//
>and came to estimate//
You have to be careful of repetitive word choices and phrasing like this. All these excerpts occur in just the first few paragraphs of chapter 2.

>wiring running from the girl's side//

Consider that you're having the narrator convey her thoughts and feelings as if his own. That means the narrator essentially is Lisa. But why would she refer to herself using something as external and impersonal as "the girl"?

>she'd recognize a hamburger anywhere//

If she's so into being a pony, why would a hamburger appeal to her that much?

>The wind has picked up as well, whereas before it was hardly noticeable, it now howled through the girl's ears, and tugged at the flapping sheets she wrapped around herself.//

You've slipped into present tense, and that second comma is a splice.

>Just a walk's away//

I don't quite get that wording.

>city limits-//

Please use a proper dash. In this case, however, since you go on to give examples, a colon would work fine instead.

>some sort of half-burnt fence of some kind//

Repetitive phrasing. And don't be so vague. "Some fence of some kind" does nothing to create a visual. What does it look like?

>been- medical//

Another spot that shouldn't be a hyphem but a dash or colon would do.

>awoken- not//

I can't keep marking all these. Suffice it to say you need to use dashes for asides or interruptions.

>the girl asked timidly//

I haven't been marking all these either, but here's another spot of her very impersonally referring to herself as "the girl."

>"Sorry, I-I'm sorry." he replied//

Punctuation.

>No, no," Lisa cut in, "It's fine.//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>Time and time again, Lisa would spot the strange man and his briefcase scurrying about the city. As the minutes turned to hours//

It's kind of hard to justify "time and time again" within just a few hours.

>watching as the noise slowly returned as the same people who had disappeared into the buildings//

That feels like an incomplete sentence. As those people did what?

>the girl, like so many other confused citizens, were//

The subject for "were" is "the girl," but there's a number mismatch.

>A hand raised from the crowd.//

The story's been from her perspective, but this wouldn't be how she perceives her own hand raising. I'm surprised she counts herself among the residents, though. She's not familiar with this place, so I don't know why she thinks of herself as part of "we."

>you are welcome to ask us any questions you'd like."

>
>She turned, and began walking towards the side-door of the building, her colleagues trailing behind.//
That doesn't sound like someone willing to answer questions. I don't know if you did this on purpose.

At this point, I'm going to pick up the pace and stop marking more instances of the same things I've seen so far. This means I'll chiefly comment on plot or character issues.

The biggest issue is the mechanics, but there are also lots of world-building questions left unanswered, and the pacing is really slow.

To those questions... how is it that only a minority lives in these simulations, but it's such a crisis to even feed them when they wake up? What infrastructure is there to keep these sims going? How do the users pay for it? What motivation did all these people have to go into them in the first place?

And the pacing. It seems like so many chapters were pretty identical. Lisa engaging with managing the awakened people, talking to Pinkie, etc. So many chapters didn't have anything consequential happen. In that sense, it's slow, because it takes lots of scenes for the plot to advance any. But it's fast in the sense that so many of the scenes are very short, and that usually means you're not developing things enough. You're just not able to give things much depth. A great example of that comes in chapter 28:
>I've grown to love my life in this reality just as much as Equestria.
The story really never tells me either side of this. I know from watching the show how much Twilight loves her friends and enjoys living there. But show me your personal vision of that. Don't rely on the show to do your work for you. And on the human side, I never get any sense that Lisa likes it there so much that it rivals Equestria for her. She enjoys the organization tasks she's assigned, but until this statement, I had no clue she'd developed any attachment to the real world. She did want to find out what was going on, but she never came across as loving the real world anywhere close as much as she loves Equestria.

I don't quite get the title, either, as only certain ones of the humans are in a pony simulation. Was it initially created with that as the only world, and then they expanded it from there?

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3197

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Sunday around Princess Twilight’s school was rarely too exciting a locale, and today was no exception.//

The first sentence already sounds odd to me. You open with the time, but then you say it's the place that's unexciting. We know from canon that the school can be very active, so it really is the time you should be focused on. I'd recommend changing that "locale" so it's saying that afternoon is what's typically boring, not that place.

>The time was nearing noon, and Celestia’s sun hung lazily above without a single interfering cloud in sight.//

This happens enough that we have a term for it: the weather report opening. It's so common that it's cliche, and you don't want to begin the story giving the reader the impression that he's going to see a bunch of unoriginal stuff. Unless the weather is an important plot point, skip it.

That first scene really does nothing. It gives me a basic locale, mood, and character, but does nothing interesting with any of them and doesn't set any plot point into motion. I wouldn't be lost without it, which is a pretty good indication that it's extraneous.

Same with the second scene. Nothing happens.

>What mattered was the fact that he could see it with his own two eyes, feel the ground with his own four hooves; the bitter winds on his grey coat.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>This was the proof. He was back.//

This is trying to be dramatic, but I have no context for why it would be. You can't just drum up tension artificially. You have to get the reader to care about it first, and I have no idea what's going on or who this is, so I'm pretty low on tension right now.

>“Hello?” She asked//

Don't capitalize speech tags that follow dialogue. GDocs used to cause problems by automatically doing this when the speech ended in a question mark or exclamation mark. I don't know if that's what's happened here.

>filly,” The omnipresent voice continued to urge.//

Well, you're even doing it with a comma, which GDocs doesn't cause. You sometimes get this right, though.

>she spread two feathered wings//

>Silver landed two claws and two hooves//
You sure like to enumerate her appendages.

>The young hippogriff//

Be careful with your perspective. You're using a limited narrator who takes on Silverstream's identity. He'll vocalize her thoughts and opinions for her, and he takes a conversational tone. That forges a closer connection between the character and the reader than an omniscient narrator will. But the trade-off is that the narrator can only tell me what Silver knows or perceives, and he has to perceive it the same way she would. The narration should be considered Silver's stream of thought, so she's the one choosing to refer to herself as "the young hippogriff." People just don't think of themselves (or others they know, for that matter) in such external and abstract terms. Phrases like this are hurting your choice of narrator.

>headmare Twilight’s//

When used as a title attached to a name, that would be capitalized.

>“Little pony, I-”//

Please use a proper dash for asides and interruptions.

>hoping that wherever this strange being was, they were getting her good side.//

Also beware of explaining a character's motives, especially in a limited narration. Just have her hope this. Don't say she hoped it, because then the narrator becomes a middleman nd stops being Silver. Something like "she posed in case this strange being had a view of her good side" gets cross that she's hoping so without saying it.

>“Wow. You should really get out more often," She gave the darkness a flat look.//

You can't just tack any given action to speech with a comma. It has to be a speaking action. This one isn't, so make it a separate sentence.

>hippo...what//

>I… ugh//
Note the inconsistent spacing. The Second is preferred, since it tends to format better.

>He deep, resounding laugh that shook the very crystal Silverstream was standing on.//

Phrasing is off.

>“No, you see, the trap is-”//

Again, use a dash. Just sweep the whole story for these.

>It was true that this was a flaw in his plan the unicorn had not considered.//

Don't switch perspective like this. You'd been in Silver's head, but now you've jumped to Sombra's. There's a brief discussion of "head hopping" at the top of this thread that will explain.

>the unicorn couldn’t help but commend himself on such a purely genius move.//

Capitalization.

>The unicorn grew confused at this, usually ponies went completely insane after less than half this amount of climbing.//

Comma splice.

Yeah, your perspective keeps wandering back and forth. That's not a good thing to do. Whose story do you want this to be? You can switch perspectives at scene breaks, if you want to show both sides. You can even shift perspective during a scene, if you do so smoothly and have a good justification of why it's a good idea. But for the time we've spent in Sombra's head so far, nothing important gets revealed. It doesn't matter that we'r in his perspective. If you don't make it matter, there's no point in doing this.

>Slowly, Silver removed two feathered wings from her face//

You're really obsessed with enumerating her appendages.

>his prisoner//

How is she a prisoner? She isn't confined.

>soul!//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>At this, Sombra was completely taken aback, “But my magic…//

You have a non-speaking action as a speech tag again.

Just note that once I've pointed out a couple instances of the same problem, I'm not continuing to do so. That doesn't mean there aren't any others.

>You don’t feel resent towards me//

Resentment or resentful

>i’ve//

Capitalization.

>But the airborne Silver wasn’t paying much attention, all of that was directed towards the gorgeous sights below her.//

Comma splice.

>But the hippogriff made a fair point, even while he wasn’t able to bend it to his will just yet, Equestria did look quite lovely from this perspective.//

Comma splice.

>i’ve//

Capitalization on the same word again.

>i'm//

I don't know why you're missing this in contractions so much.

>they won't even know its you//

Its/it's confusion.

>Wooooah//

Why do so many authors spell this wrong?

>Pretencious//

Pretentious

>created my the magic of ancient alicorns//

Typo.

>unnoticeably shrinking//

If it's unnoticeable, then how is she noticing it to include it in the narration?

>it’s time for my friends and I to leave this place//

This is actually a spot for "me," not "I."

> it.He had done it.For//

Missing spaces.

>the hippogriff cheeks//

Missing a possessive, but again, this is a very external term for her to use about herself.

>their made their way//

Typo.

>The monsters were quick to overtake their former master and cloak him in shadow from above, but none could get too close.//

That sounds contradictory.

>Sombra, look, the portal! It’s getting smaller!//

You're hitting an awful lot of tropes in this story.

>I guess i’ll be starting school pretty soon. Accept-//

Seems like you meant "except."

The story itself isn't bad, though it's pretty predictable, but the two biggest issues are the persistent editing problems and the unsteady perspective.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3199

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>The Ponyville Hospital wasn't actually busy, the nurses had me waiting simply because it was me in the waiting room.//

In the first sentence, there's already a comma splice. That comma is just tacking together two complete sentences. You could use a dash or semicolon there, or you could actually split it into two sentences. There are times intentional comma splices can work, but not as the first sentence, since the reader has no context for whether you're doing it to create an effect.

>I was receiving from from other ponies//

Two things. First, the obvious repeated word. Second, "to be" verbs aren't very engaging to read, and it's a good idea to avoid them where possible. If you just said "I received" instead of "I was receiving," it doesn't hurt anything, and then it's more direct and active.

>A lich is an undead creature by the way//

I know it can be fun to do something like this, but consider what it means to the story. You've made it so that I'm not longer an observer of action that has nothing to do with me. Now you have the narrator aware I'm there and speaking to me. That makes me a character, and I need to be justified like any other character. Why am I listening to him? Under what circumstances? Why does he want me to hear it? Typically, if you want to address the reader, you do so from the start. A common tactic is to have the narrator invite you in to sit down with him, and he explains that he has a story he wants you to hear. But if you just start randomly addressing the reader out of nowhere, it's jarring. Presuming that's not what you want to do, then find a less obtrusive way of working this information in. I bet all your readers know what a lich is anyway, but if you want to say it, then try something like "...one begins to understand that sort of attention given to a pony lich such as myself. Most ponies don't feel comfortable associating with the undead, after all."

>necronomicon//

Are you using that generically or as the actual title of the book? If the latter, then capitalize and italicize it.

>Oh the questions you’re sure to have, though you’ll have to be patient, as they will all be explained in good time.//

Okay, so you really do want to do fourth wall breaking. Unfortunately, this does mean that the reader needs a justification for being there. Is Bone telling me this story some time later? It sounds more like he's in the moment, which places me there at the hospital with him. Did I come with him? Am I some random person in the waiting room?

>my job to Luna is to look into the unsolved deaths of ponies; a very grim profession I assure you.//

You should be able to replace a semicolon with a period and have the resulting sentences stand as complete, but the part after it here wouldn't be. A dash would work, since it's a change in his train of thought. A colon could, too, since you're clarifying or defining something.

>pale and white//

That's an odd phrasing. White is pale. Why do you need to mention both?

>possible.I//

Missing space.

>The deep black of frayed hairs on my leg rubbing against her to reassure her while my horn glowed to levitate the small precious load.//

That's a sentence fragment, and with this limited a narrator, they can be used stylistically, but this whole thing is a grammatical element called an absolute phrase, and they make poor fragments, since they're supposed to describe something, so when they stand alone, there's nothing for them to describe.

>I wish the phylactery life sustain effect didn't cause so much issue with appearance and degradation of my physical features.//

Two problems with what's going on here. First, you're digging into addressing the reader, and I don't know what motivates him to explain it or why the listener wants to know. But also consider that in a first-person narration, you're giving me the character's internal thoughts. Those thoughts are occurring simultaneously with the action. So he's just been called back to see the doctor. Surely, he's just going to walk back there. If he has to wait in the examination room for a few minutes, then he's go time to think about these things, but you're having him think about them while he's walking with the nurse. Why would this be on his mind right now? It doesn't feel authentic. It also means that whoever he's talking to is walking back there with him.

>I should have--”//

This is one reason why it's better to use an actual dash than a double hyphen. You can't control the typesetting on FiMFiction, and it's put a line break between the hyphens, at least on my screen.

>Maulwarf//

You hadn't capitalized that in the previous chapter.

>Oh come on Bone,//

You've made this error a couple of times. When you use direct address in the middle of a sentence like this, it takes commas both before and after.

>Having spent a few centuries as a lich, my lips were almost entirely gone.//

This says his lips had spent a few centuries as a lich, not that he had.

>lying snuggly against the mare//

In this sense, it seems like you must have meant "snugly."

>She stirred../

Extra period.

>who I initially believed//

Whom, but as this is the character speaking, it's up to you whether he'd get that right.

>which appeared to large for her head//

To/too confusion.

>The color of her irises were of a deep red that spoke of blood and violence.//

It's getting repetitive to have all those "of" phrases. You could just drop the second "of" and be fine. You also have a number mismatch of a singular subject (color) and a plural verb (were).

>Passersby ponies//

When you use a noun in front of another noun like this, it should be singular, so "passerby." But instead of saying "passerby ponies," why not just "passersby"? It goes without saying hey were ponies. That's the default, and if they were anything else, he would have said so.

>letting all those around us to see and know//

You don't need that "to." In this kind of construction, it's implied.

>I second I walked through those great doors//

Wrong word.

>hoof step//

That'd be one word, like "footstep."

>better more pressing matters//

Put a comma after "better."

>Regardless, they had better things to do//

You just said that.

>stone mason//

>repair man//
These should be single words. But what is this "man" you speak of?

>here the last time I visited. “I should come up here//

Try to avoid repeating a word close together like this, unless it's an extremely mundane one (like "the") or you're doing it on purpose for an effect.

>far off//

Hyphenate.

>my myself//

One of these shouldn't be there. Actually, neither one should. Grammatically, "me" is the correct choice.

>I opened my mouth was ready to answer her//

Phrasing is off.

>The two sisters began whispering to each other and I shook my head.//

There are two clauses here. That is, you have two subject that each get their own verbs. Normally, you'd put a comma between them, just before the conjunction.

>Surely you must remember me Celestia,//

Needs another comma for direct address.

>I'll just be back tomorrow and we'll have this same conversation once more.//

Another spot that needs a comma between the clauses.

>Luna may be smaller than Celestia but don't let that fool you, of the two Luna is the one you should be afraid to anger.//

Comma splice, plus you're talking to the reader again. Even if you'd framed the first chapter as Bone having an audience, we're in a flashback now, and the audience wouldn't be in the flashback with him, so it makes even less sense to acknowledge an audience now.

>I am only suppose to receive//

supposed

>on to how they passed away//

You don't need that "to."

>equestrian//

Capitalize.

>hoever//

Typo.

>against my horn and pressed against//

Watch the close repetition.

>well...,//

Don't use a comma with an ellipsis.

>This is my royal decree and I am sure my sister also agrees with it.//

Needs a comma between the clauses. I also don't understand Luna's purpose here. It's of paramount importance to make sure this filly is cared for responsibly. What makes her think Bone is capable of that?

>a shield of black between myself and the two princesses//

Another spot where "me" is appropriate instead of "myself." Reflexive pronouns really only get used when what thet refer to is also the subject of the clause.

>head .“I//

The space and period are in the wrong order.

>A feeling I had never experienced till now, utter despair and loss, those were things you just never encountered as a lich.//

That second comma is a splice.

>still living//

Hyphenate.

>They've been running while we were talking.//

Well, you've established an audience for him, but 1) you were addressing an audience before he got to the doctor's office and 2) the flashbacks aren't in a format that would work for an oral retelling, since he's presenting all the past dialogue as quotations. People just don't recount things that way.

It also strikes me that Bone is giving the doctor a ton of unnecessary information. The doctor doesn't need her life story. He only needs to know anything that might affect his diagnosis. I'm sure you can come up with a way of justifying why he tells her complete history, but the reason you have right now is pretty thin.

>ages.I//

Missing space.

>Whether she had returned to sleep or just lying there//

The verb forms are inconsistent.

>Her name doesn’t seem to be listed.. great.//

Not sure if that was supposed to be an ellipsis, and why are you in present tense?

>Annoyed that I had no choice but to do this//

Beware just bluntly naming his emotion. It's not a good way to engage the reader. Plus the previous sentence already paints him as annoyed.

>foal's//

I hadn't noticed until now, so I might have missed other examples, but you'd had fancy style quotation marks and apostrophes through most of the story. This is a simple style apostrophe, though. Maybe you directly edited this part on FiMFiction? But now that I look, I do see other inconsistent styles of these. Make them one uniform style.

>mid section//

midsection

>4, maybe 5//

These are short enough numbers that you should write them out.

>Or was she genuinely afraid of the fall from the slab to the floor.//

That's a question, right?

>My impatience came out as a groaned//

Phrasing is off.

>Being a foal//

Participial phrases like this are normally set off with a comma.

>My spell broke and she dropped unceremoniously and harshly to the ground.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>31//

Another number you should write out.

>that sound of tears hitting the metal below her was something couldn’t stand any longer//

Missing word.

>Acting on a hunch, my horn glowed with magic//

This says his horn acted on a hunch.

>examination on her physical well being//

That's usually phrased as "of," and it's "well-being."

>I finally I detached//

Extraneous word.

>then; held them up to her//

Drop the semicolon. You don't need anything there.

>opened her shut eyes//

That sounds pretty self-explanatory. You can't open them if they aren't shut.

>would have delighted//

Missing word.

>this,,//

Extra comma.

>hoove’s//

hoof's

>I looked a the cadavers//

Typo.

>That won’t do; if we’re forced to spend an extended amount of time together, I have to call her something other than “Foal”.//

You've gone into present tense again.

>You, until I find a more suitable one, your name shall be,” I looked at both of her parents then at the clipboard that contained their names, I choose 1 name from each to form hers. “...mm.... Life Sapphire. Understood?”//

Okay, this is kind of a mess. The "chose" is present tense, the comma before it is a splice, the number should be spelled out, and you have a non-speaking action masquerading as a speech tag.

>cheek..“You//

Extraneous period, missing space.

>She nuzzled my leg even harder and shook her head at me.//

Does she really have so little attachment to her parents that their deaths have no effect on her? She doesn't appear to care in the least. And if she breathed in fire to the point she burned her voice box, shouldn't she be in a lot of pain?

>Just how can this possibly get any worse?//

Present tense again.

>29 days,” I replied, “and she stayed with the corpse for nearly 2 hours//

Just scan through the story for numbers and write them out. The most common cutoff is that if it takes more than two or three words, then you can use numerals.

>but has she been able speak again?//

Missing word.

>Life Sapphire’s hoof, then pricked her skin underneath//

He's not really drawing blood from her hoof. That's like trying to do it from your fingernail. Just have him draw it from a foreleg or something.

>I wanted to kill him then and there for causing even the slightest bit of discomfort to her.//

That's... extreme, especially for someone who obviously wants nothing more than to help her.

>blood work//

bloodwork

>life threatening//

Hyphenate.

>I looked to Doctor Horses and completely blanched, my undead heart would have skipped from over a hundred miles away at that moment if it still beat.//

Comma splice.

>But first, how about you tell me how long have you’ve been referring to her as your daughter.//

Same deal I talked about earlier with her life history. Why does this matter to her treatment? It doesn't seem like a reasonable thing for him to ask for, much less delay him over.

>I bite//

Present tense.

>Well then, seems like you have some explaining to do.//

Why's he pressing Bone on this? There's zero reason for him to.

>Anytime I tried to work on them while she was awake resulted in me finding a crying filly attached to my legs.//

Is she crying over her parents? If not, then doesn't he find it suspicious that she has no attachment to them?

>I would begin to work on the seventh day when she came up to me with a bright pink soccer ball.//

That phrasing is off. I don't see what "would" has to do with it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3200

>>3199
Is that soccer ball in the picture actually pink? I can't tell.

>if it had not tug in a way that I experienced guilt and sadness.//

Another phrasing I can't figure out, plus you're directly naming his emotions again.

>Emotions were beyond me, this was frustrating to no end to feel them again.//

Comma splice.

>Unable to process bodies under such conditions, the frustration steadily built for over a minute.//

This says the frustration was unable to process bodies.

>I snapped and flung my scalpel in frustration across the room.//

And now you're repeating "frustration" in the next sentence.

>For six days I had played her games, dealt with her, had to train her to use the toilet!//

So why isn't he looking forward to the opportunity to turn her over to an orphanage?

>She began to tear up and my vision softened.//

Needs a comma.

>I don't have words for it//

>an act that can only be described as terrifying.//
>I am beginning to realize she has much more to her//
You've gone to present tense again.

>player..//

Extra period.

>Great, I'm stuck doing this whether I desire to or not.//

More present tense.

>it’s meaning//

Its/it's confusion.

>forcing me to paused//

>her breathes//
Typo.

>Tear glands protested their inability for an undead creature to cry.//

But you had him cry earlier. Why can't he now?

>reveilation//

Typo.

>blood work//

bloodwork

>be it viral or fungal//

Fungal isn't very common. It's weird he says that but not bacterial.

>Setting the results down, Doctor Horses horn glowed//

Missing possessive, and this says his horn set the results down.

>her with his horn.//

I don't know what this is doing here.

>She’s still in critical condition//

I haven't been given reason to think she's in critical condition, and the doctor seems awfully calm if that's the case. Plus my earlier comment about him listening to a bunch of info that has no bearing on that.

>I’ll examine her, but you must give me a complete history of everything that transpired while she was in your care?//

Why is that a question?

>she was going much slowly, starting at her bulbous head//

Who is "she"? You're also missing a word, and "bulbous" is a really strange word to use her.

>Mothers shielded their foals as we neared and stallions snorted at me like I was some sort of apparition to be challenged.//

Needs a comma.

>learly this only proved how little they understand that my work advances//

Present tense.

>she held but with a bright smile//

I don't know what you meant to say there.

>back, ready to kick it back//

Watch the close repetition.

>six times the length of her body. What was just a few hoofsteps for me must have felt like a football field to her//

Six body lengths shouldn't be a big deal, especially if she can walk to the park.

>watche dher//

Typo.

>soft beat of my heart from it’s locked safe far away..//

Its/it's confusion, extra period, and you're really using this concept an awful lot, to the point it's getting repetitive.

>starring//

Typo.

>I didn’t have a real reason beyond I felt like if Sapphire could see my face in the sun//

That's a rather jumbled phrasing.

>centuries old//

Hyphenate.

>tried to get through, though, as they tried//

Close repetition.

>The sun made me uncomfortable, its light hitting against my centuries-old flesh almost burned like a flamethrower of photons.//

Comma splice.

>No, nice felt ill fitting to describe what I was feeling//

Ill-fitting, and missing period.

>pent up//

Hyphenate.

>it's sealed container//

Its/it's confusion, and this concept is getting very tired by now.

>How has this little foal, who can't even speak, touch me in ways that hundreds of ponies through the centuries couldn't.//

Present tense, the verb form of "touch" is off, and this is a question.

>her,holding//

Missing space.

>My heart my pounding at that point//

Typo.

>She’s cute and it’s affecting me!//

Present tense.

>they looked at Life Sapphire and I understood the nomenclature.//

Capitalization, needs a comma, and "nomenclature" is a really strange word for this.

>look.,//

Extra punctuation.

>given how awful I sound when I laugh//

Present tense, missing period.

>She moved to hide behind my hooves and I felt this parental need to expose her to them.//

Needs a comma.

>Why don’t you join us Life Sapphire, I'm Alluring Flower.//

Comma splice, the first part should be a question, and you need a comma for direct address.

>here” I assured her.//

Missing comma.

>confusion,Alluring//

Missing space.

>trying to understand Sapphire and I//

"Me" is the correct choice here. To illustrate, only leave Bone in there. Would he say "trying to understand I" or "trying to understand me"?

>I most certainly have given them everything by the days end//

Present tense, missing apostrophe.

>Luna's decree concerning Life Sapphire and I//

Same thing with I/me.

>Friendship express//

Both words would be capitalized.

>everyday//

"Everyday" and "every day" aren't the same thing. The one you have means something close to "usual."

>am I becoming attached? Did I just admit that I’m looking forward to spending more time with her?//

Present tense.

>I hung my head at the mares stare//

Missing apostrophe.

>“Genetic Disorders”//

If this is just the title of one article, you're fine with it in quotes, but if it's the title of the whole journal, use italics instead.

>Lich//

Why is that capitalized?

>I actually worried what my profession I might be doing to Life Sapphire.//

Phrasing is off.

>Doctor Horses adjusted his glassed//

Typo.

>Doctor Horses stopped his hooves back.//

I don't know what that means.

>he then got between myself and Life Sapphire//

Use "me" here, since Bone isn't the subject.

>W-wait, I'm a necromancer pony! Death is a quick and easy fix, I could... No, no that isn't right in the slightest.//

>no matter what happens//
>I can save her//
Present tense.

>Now it was Doctor Horses turn//

Missing apostrophe.

>won't that you’ll die//

Missing word.

>permanently?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>humorous..//

Extra period.

>Both myself and Doctor Horses//

Both Doctor Horses and I

>I saw within her the potential to bring you back to life.//

So she deliberately set up Bone Daddy to sacrifice his life? That's not a very nice thing to do.

>your personal pupil//

What's she going to teach an earth pony? I mean, I guess the alicorns might have earth pony characteristics, too, but they're typically shown as magic instructors. Celestia's school is just for unicorns, after all.

>care of her personally//

care for

>she will stay in the castle with myself and Celestia//

me

>fulfilling my commandment beyond what any pony would ever have expected of you.//

But Luna pretty much said the exact opposite just a bit ago, that she put him in the situation on purpose because she wanted him to make this choice.

>daddy loves her//

When used in isolation like this (as opposed to something like having "her" in front of it), "Daddy" would be capitalized.

>Loves//

Why is that capitalized?

>I don’t know when we transition there//

Present tense.

>Just stay here with daddy//

Capitalize "Daddy."

>I already felt my weakness growing//

>I held onto her hoof as long as I could now//
The comma after this is a splice.

>heart beat//

heartbeat

>one..//

Extra period.

>brighter than ever before//

Needs a comma after this, and the rest of the sentence is pretty repetitive with the previous one.

>in that feeling moment//

You sure you didn't mean "fleeting"?

>daughters first words//

Missing apostrophe.

>where now gathered//

Where/were confusion.

>than onto a platform made for her to stand on//

Than/then confusion.

>What hurts is the heart your sharin'//

Your/you're confusion.

Okay, you get some leeway with songs, but the syllable count is pretty uneven, and some of the rhymes are quite a stretch. Were this straight poetry, I'd definitely call it out. As a song, it's okay, but it could be better.

And just a warning: if song lyrics go on for more than a screen, readers will start skipping over them. You might want to add a bit of narration after every second or third verse to break it up.

>And now you cleared mine of all it's strife//

Its/it's confusion.

It should be clear that the major problems are editing, wavering tense, and the way you address the audience. It also feels like it's skimping on the depth of their relationship. The scene of them in the park is good. It demonstrates that they're becoming a family instead of just having the narrator assure me they are. You need more of that, or else the story's pretty superficial.

Then the ending just seems engineered for maximum sadness, particularly that picture and the deathbed love confessions. You have to earn that kind of thing by carefully building up their relationship like I just talked about. The more relatable it is, the more it'll grab the reader. Plus the feeling that he was unfairly roped into this by Luna adds a sour note.

AlzriusCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3202

>>3174
>>3175

Thank you so much for taking the time to pre-read my story. I appreciate all the feedback you've given me, and wanted to reply to some of the points you raised. Please note that I don't use chan boards, so I can only hope that I won't make too much of a mess with the formatting.

First, I've gone through and fixed the various typos you located; thanks for catching those.

With regard to the two largest edits you noted, those being the the changes in perspective and the instances of participles synchronizing with the ensuing action, I disagree with the points you raised.

In regard to the first (perspective shifting), I don't believe that this is actually a problem. While I would certainly believe that there's an editor's guide or style manual for writing prose fiction that says you shouldn't do this with regard to third-person narration, the practice is so widespread in contemporary fiction that I don't believe that this point is anything other than academic. For this style of narration, if there are multiple characters in close proximity to each other, and all of them are viewing, hearing, or otherwise experiencing the same thing, then there's really no issues involved with altering perspective from paragraph to paragraph. As you didn't say that it caused confusion or other issues of comprehension, and that I can find examples of this in virtually any contemporary novel written in the third-person, it's not an issue that I'm overly concerned about.

The same can be said for having participles that synchronize with the action that follows them. Simply put, while this might violate some rule regarding grammatical syntax, I find any such rule to be arcane. I've seen this particular usage of participles used any number of times, and it's always been very clear that it's meant to indicate how two actions are happening so quickly that they might as well be simultaneous. The understanding, once again, is clear, and so this seems more like an issue of style than anything else.

These were the major things I wanted to discuss, and so I'll just go over a few others briefly.

>This is a rather big thing, that he would be granted part of Equestria to rule, but it's just... there. I have no idea how or why this occurred.


Chapter five is devoted to the backstory covers the main character's motivation and how he got to where he is now. Putting it there, right after the first major problem has come up, instead of in the opening is called "burying the lede."

>Why do you feel the need to explain this? Don't you trust the reader to figure out what's going on?


There's no particular vice in simply stating something directly. It's only a problem when it's done too often, and with no other descriptive aspects to indicate what's occurring.

>Chapter 25 is basically one solid block of exposition. It's rather tedious to read.


That's an issue of perspective; I've had some comments that it was helpful and informative. Either way, however, it was necessary. Powers and abilities need to be outlined upfront, lest they simply seem to appear out of nowhere. Given that this involves the way that magic works, there wasn't much opportunity to utilize it in a more active context. Hence, the chapter had to be what it was.

>Just because you have a character doesn't mean it adds something to inhabit his perspective. That's the case here.


I disagree. We've already established that the villain is intelligent, and so their perspective needs to be taken into account simply because not doing so, especially after so much lead in, is anticlimactic. At the very least, the dragon's perspective and motivation needed to be acknowledged, especially as a lead in to showcasing his perspective later in the fight.

>More of these italicized paragraphs that are supposed to be flashbacks. They're confusing. At first, they look like they're character thoughts. Flashbacks typically deserve to be separate scenes, but then they'd need to be longer than these.


It's because they're not longer that they're not separate scenes. While the flashback in chapter thirty is its own scene, these flashbacks aren't long enough to warrant that, as you noted. Likewise, you were able to figure out that they were flashbacks and not thoughts, so the issue of confusion doesn't seem to have been overly burdensome. I'll certainly admit that it doesn't help that I'm using italics for both thoughts and flashbacks, but the context is clear enough that I'm not overly concerned.

>What these changes of perspective also mean is that you're constantly going over the same events 2 or 3 times.


This is necessary because otherwise you risk having relevant characters who essentially disappear during the sequence of events. During certain scenes (most notably action scenes), it becomes necessary to account for what everyone is doing. Hence, if you keep the perspective tightly focused around one character for any length of time, you need to go back and account for what other people were doing during that same period. To put it another way, showing what those other characters were doing is the new information that's given.

>He's known her for, what, a few days?


A few weeks, actually. Chapter five covered that in more detail, but by this point they've known each other for several weeks, albeit only been in a relationship for a few days (and already admitted that they love each other; both of them are very passionate individuals).

>It strikes me that since they defeated the dragon, there's very little momentum to the story. Nobody's really struggling for anything, and there's no developing conflict.


Not everything needs to be conflict. In this case, the following chapters were about resolution, as their business in Tall Tale comes to a close while simultaneously laying the groundwork for the next phase of their adventure.

>So precisely the right scroll fell out of Lex's bag by chance? There's an old guideline about writing that has a lot of truth to it: Coincidence is a fine way for characters to get into trouble. It's a terrible way for them to get out of trouble.


In fact, all of the scrolls fell out of his bag, as it says his possessions were scattered about. It's more of a coincidence that the scroll contained such a helpful spell, but that's nitpicking. It's more salient to say that coincidence isn't really a problem so long as it's used sparingly. Given how often I've subjected the main character to bad luck up until now, a stroke of good luck was called for.

>The story doesn't stand alone well. I did at least get a sense of who the characters were and why some of this was happening, but I did feel at a big disadvantage for not knowing who Lex is, what he'd gone through to get him to this point, and the world-building involving Everglow.


The issue of not seeing more of what Lex went through to get to where he is now is a legitimate one, albeit one that I've tried to make clear with various flashbacks and exposition. (That, and I'm not sure how much his backstory would work as its own tale.) With regard to Everglow, that's also an artifact of this story picking up from where the previous story by a different author left off. As it stands, Everglow functions more as a background element than anything else partially for that very reason. Should the story move back there, the world-building would be much more front-and-center.

>It doesn't feel like there's a strong overall story arc here. Lex has this lofty, fairly abstract goal of ruling Vanhoover. The synopsis seems to say he wants to rule all of Equestria, though nothing I'd read so far speaks to that. This would seem to be a big concern for Celestia and Luna, except that in 100 chapters, they only show up once, vaguely hint that they have their own machinations, then promptly disappear for dozens of chapters again.


That's because the arc is so large that it can seem flat. For example, Lex openly admits that he wants to rule an independent kingdom (breaking away part of Equestria's territory) in chapter 44, and later on reveals that to be a stepping stone in his plan to taking over all of Equestria. The early chapters likewise establish that he demanded that Celestia and Luna abdicate in his favor, and was prepared to fight them when they predictably said no. Sonata convinced him to stand down, and instead the Royal Sisters told him to go rule Vanhoover, which needed help in the wake of the recent disaster anyway (killing two birds with one stone). They're not unaware of his ambition, in other words, but are letting him exercise some of it in an place that needs exactly that. While it's only hinted at, the two chapters they appear in subtly indicate that they're hoping this will mollify his further aspirations.

Having said all that, I want to mention once more how much I appreciate you going over everything and putting as much time and effort into my story as you did. Thanks again!

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3280

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>If only that was rhetorical.//

You'll normally phrase a hypothetical statement like this in subjunctive mood: "If only that were rhetorical."

>I wasn’t always the fluffy purple pony as I write this.//

Feels like there are some words missing. This doesn't really make sense as written.

>homo sapien//

homo sapiens

>I hear you ask//

I'm hoping that at some point, we'll know what audience she's addressing.

>But I kinda miss being one//

"Kinda" isn't something I'd expect to see formally written. Keep in mind she's writing this in a journal, not speaking it.

>Technically speaking though… Nevermind, it’s complicated.//

This is another spot that comes across as a spoken affectation, not a written one.

>I was on records//

Usually that's just phrased as "record."

>But no//

Here's another thing that doesn't make sense for a written record. How does she differentiate italics from normal font? Is one print and the other cursive? When people want to emphasize something in writing, typically they'll underline it, write in all caps, or make it dark.

>All horse parts and all tiny?//

How does she know she's tiny? What reference is she using to compare size?

>“Hey, Twilight!” A voice to my right shouts.//

Capitalization f the speech tag.

>“Hey, Twilight!” A voice to my right shouts.//

This is a common issue with journal or letter stories. When people write such things, they tend to sum up conersations, not present them as quoted dialogue. People also write such things well after the conversations happened, meaning they wouldn't even remember what was said well enough to make them quotations.

>scale covered//

Hyphenate.

>for second//

Missing word.

>fibb

fib

>guards-” He cuts himself off//

Use a proper dash not a hyphen, for cutoffs. And the punctuation already means he was cut off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>we were wondering if you could help carrying her//

The verb form of "carrying" isn't right.

>hospital?” He asks hopefully//

Capitalization.

>I turn to look at her in shock//

>I stumble backwards in shock//
Repetitive, but you should also strive to demonstrate emotion, not name it. If I have to figure it out from her behavior, it's a lot better than you just telling me what it is.

>“See!” She shouted in jubilation.//

Capitalization, and you've gone to past tense.

>me!” She shouts//

Capitalization. You get the picture. I'm not going to mark any more of these.

>the…” I pause for a second, “stuff//

You're trying to make that narrative action a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb. You could do it as an aside. Here's how to format one:
the—” I pause for a second “—stuff

>shifting to lay on my side//

lie

>peop— uh//

Don't leave space on either side of an em dash.

>I’ll fill you all in//

Who is it she's writing this for? She never says. I can only assume it's for her own benefit, except then she wouldn't say this. Whatever you're doing here, there isn't any reason why you're doing it that way.

>I watch silently as the dragon pushes open the wooden door. It creaks as the room within is flooded with light. A distant bookshelf is illuminated in the far back, spines shining as my eyes pass over them.//

There are a few things that many authors tend to repeat to excess. "As" clauses are one. You have one in every sentence of this paragraph. It gets repetitive.

>the wealth of knowledge at my fingertips//

Except she doesn't have fingers...

>I pour over the history section//

pore

>I began my careful descent of the stairs//

You've switched to past tense.

>dusting on of the shelves’ larger tomes//

Typo.

>the pony in the room//

That's a strange way for Twilight to refer to herself.

>I walk to the rightmost shelf and began browsing//

Past tense again, and it's the same verb as the last time.

>The reply came a second later.//

Even more past tense.

>Twi—” Spike’s cry is cut off//

The dash already means it gets cut off. Narrating that as well is redundant.

>I began rapidly trotting down the path//

Yeah, I think you've got a problem with that particular verb for some reason.

>Silence wafts through the streets, early accentuated by dull wind whistling through the alleys.//

I don't know what "early" has to do with it.

>I began to draw closer//

I'm not going to mark these past tense errors anymore. You'll have to scan for them.

>what looks like fresh ropes//

You have a singular verb with a plural subject.

>I’m surprised when I realize just how sturdy the pass is, whoever worked on it did a good job.//

Comma splice.

>My vision clears somewhat as the pain lessons.//

This says she's learning pain. You want "lessens."

>Truly, Celestia spoke highly of thee before she was banished,” she lets go of my aching head, but I continue to stare at her.//

You have a non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>thou are not Twilight Sparkle, are thou//

art

>Next is the pink pony from before, smiling brilliantly despite the situation, she catches my eye and gives a quick wink causing my grimace to lessen slightly.//

Comma splice.

>between Nightmare Moon and I//

This is actualy a spot for "me."

The diary entry at the beginning of chapter 3 is confusing. Previous chapters made it sound like they were entirely entries. Now this one makes it sound more like the first short scene is the entry, and the rest is a flashback of live action. Yet this entry says it's going to describe what happens, then ends before it does so. Is the chapter to be considered the rest of the written record then? Or are we being made privy to events the diary doesn't describe?

>My fur laid flat//

lay

>It — her — stood with a proud and intimidating posture//

That "her" should be "she."

>Thou needs//

needest

>thou represents//

If you're going to use archaic language, please research it so you can get it right.

>I opened my eyes slowly, fearing the sun’s light would sear into my retina//

She only has one retina for two eyes?

>stetson//

That's a proper noun and shoud be capitalized.

>harms way//

Missing apostrophe.

>I—,”//

Don't use a comma with a dash or ellipsis.

>striked//

struck

>“Uh, well—,” I looked around and saw Rarity roll her eyes.//

No comma.

>why don’t I go get Applejack before you start.//

Isn't that a question?

>I wasn’t not sure//

Double negative.

So there are a few overall problems. Some are easy to fix. There are a few persistent editing problems, and it's inconsistent about its delivery format, as to whether this is a diary/journal, whether the entire thing is supposed to be the written record or just some of the scenes, who her intended audience is, and lots of slips into past tense, especially in chapter 3.

Those are more mechanical and stylistic things. As to the plot, we're three chapters in so far, and you're not really starting to deliver what the synopsis promised. I think you'll eventually get there, but you can only string a reader along so far before he starts to lose interest. We know nothing about this human character, except that she's not as grammatically fastidious as Twilight and somewhat prone to profanity. But I know nothing about her personality, what her life on Earth was like, and she's not taking any measures so far to try getting back home or convince anyone of her predicament. I don't even know what her aim here is. She seems to have some prior knowledge of how the pilot episode plays out, such that she's advancing that plot on purpose. I do appreciate that you're not doing a complete rehashing of that episode. Some of the same events have happened, but it's taking a different direction.

Still, we're pretty far into the story now not to have an idea of who this human character is, what she's like, what she's trying to accomplish in Equestria, and how she's going to go about doing that. If a reader doesn't have a pretty good idea of the story's conflict by now and doesn't know the character well enough to have a rooting interest in her, he's not that likely to stick with it.

For an example, look at your by-chapter view counts. No chaptered story retains all its readers to the end. That's just an unfortunate truth. The best stories tend to keep about half of them, and even good ones keep about a third. That's through all the chapter, though. You're down to a third in chapter 2 already, and a fifth in chapter 3. That'll pick up a bit when the story is complete, as some people wait until then to read it at all, but you're dropping readers at a pretty high rate. Now, that's not a problem in itself for us—we want good stories, regardless of what the reader profile looks like or how many views we expect it to get—but I think it's illustrative of the other problems I've spelled out that we do care about, namely that we're lacking so much context and we still haven't gotten to the main conflict yet.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3281

>>3202
I'm sorry it took so long for me to notice your post. I get so few replies anymore that I've fallen out of the habit of checking for them.

To your point about perspective switches, I don't doubt that you can find this in common use. There is some rather poor writing that gets published these days. It's inevitable with the sheer quantity of it. That doesn't make it good, and authors commonly use "I've seen real published works do this" as an excuse. There's good rationale behind why this is a bad idea, and I've gone into that. I can point out lots of examples where a change in perspective is confusing because it isn't apparent immediately that the perspective has changed, so the reader will initially attribute the opinions and impressions to the wrong character. It also inherently makes perspective shallower. The longer you stay with a character, the more they will identify with him, so when you keep rapidly dipping your toe in various ones, it's less immersive. And in many case, nothing useful was accomplished by the change. Take the dragon. Why did we even need to know his motivation? It isn't important. He's dead and gone, so it has no effect on things. You could have had Lex surmise his motivation and not bothered with using the dragon's perspective.

You can get away with lots of perspective changes like this in an omniscient narration, and I wonder if the examples you're citing use that kind of narrator. It's fine in that case, but it's a poor fit for limited narration, at least within a scene. Having a set of 5 scenes that each use a different perspective is fine, but inhabiting 5 different perspectives in one scene is just jumbled.

On the issue with participles, it appears you've misunderstood me. It's perfectly fine to use them when you intend actions to be simultaneous, but they break when they're used for actions that can't be. If you're saying you've seen real fiction do this, then again, that's fine if those publishers want to accept it, but that doesn't make it right.

About exposition, I agree that the information in that chapter is useful. I disagree that this is a good way to present it. The best way to handle background information is to work it in little by little, in places where it's relevant to the plot. You essentially have this as something like a textbook chapter, and it's not going to be much more entertaining than one, unless the reader is just really into your world-building.

Yes, there doesn't have to be constant conflict, but the two major drivers for any story are conflict and character growth. You go through a long stretch without conflict, which would be fine if there was interesting character growth going on as well, but for me, there really wasn't. I can skip a large number of these chapters without losing anything, and that's not good.

Yes, the arc is long, but that doesn't explain why Celestia makes one brief appearance in 100 chapters. It stands to reason this would concern her, but either deal with that or don't. It's fine to have it be something completely off camera, but you brought it into the story's forefront only to do nothing with it. If the reader's left to wonder how this is developing in the background, that's one thing, but you're the one who made a plot point of it, then promptly didn't use it again.

There's definitely writing talent here, but the biggest thing is that I just think it suffers from a lack of context. I wouldn't even recommend giving all that context, as that would mean rehashing significant parts of the other author's story. This one's just not a good entry point. If the original story's author wanted to submit his story to us and it got approved, then we could add yours, with his permission, as a sequel or side story, but main posts have to work for readers new to the material.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3304

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>I..//

Needs another dot.

>Sunbursts’ cheeks flared even brighter and he went silent for a moment//

You have a number of spots like this where you need a comma between clauses. Sometimes you get it right. You'll normally use one with a conjunction when it separates subjects that have their own verbs, as you do here (cheeks flared, and he went). You usually don't use one when the conjunction just separates subjects that share one verb or one subject that performs two verbs. You also have the apostrophe placement wrong on that possessive, and it's an error that popped up multiple times in this chapter alone.

>His face was redder than his mane!.//

Extraneous punctuation.

>Starlight’s looked up at Luna. Her eyes lit up at the remark//

Starlight's what? And you've been using Starlight as your perspective character. The narrator's been expressing her opinions for her and taking a conversational style. Essentially, the narrator is Starlight, so you have to consider what she can perceive and how. She can't see her own face, so how does she know her eyes are lighting up?

>You’re right, princess.//

When using a title as a term of address, it would be capitalized.

>embraced each other in a hug//

Redundant.

>Starlight’s teeth shone in a grand smile//

Similar to her eyes brightening, how would she know her smile was shining? She can intend for it to, and she could see by his reaction that it was, but she can't observe it directly to make it a statement of fact like this. Those are the kinds of things you have to think about when keeping to a perspective.

>G-Force//

No need to capitalize any of that.

>“You want to drag me,” Sunburst pointed at the speeding coaster, “on that?//

You have the narrative bit punctuated as if it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking action. There are 3 ways to handle this. 1) add a speaking action to it, 2) break it up into multiple sentences so the narration isn't a speech tag, or 3) format it like a narrative aside, like so:
>“You want to drag me—” Sunburst pointed at the speeding coaster “—on that?//
This version of it has him stop speaking while he points. If you don't want the speech to stop while he points, the dash placement changes:
>“You want to drag me”—Sunburst pointed at the speeding coaster—“on that?//

>He had no choice now than to endure.//

That phrasing is off, and how you fix it will depend on which part of it you want to keep. It'd be "He had no choice now but to endure" or "He had no other choice now than to endure."

>Her heart raced in anticipation//

Missing period.

>his mind calculating how much every foot in elevation would add to the speed on the way down//

Why'd you pop over to Sunburst's perspective? There's no reason to. You could make this Starlight's perspective by having her presume that's what he's doing, but by stating it as a stark fact, either you're in his head or she's reading his mind.

>three hundred feet//

There's a difference of opinion about where the cutoff is between needing to spell out numbers and use numerals. For me, it's more about how many words are involved than how big the number is, but if you're willing to spell this out, why not the rest? You've already had several short numbers in chapters 1 and 2.

>seemingly looking for a last minute escape//

See, this does effectively stay in Starlight's perspective. That "seemingly" makes it her judgment instead of her somehow having absolute knowledge of it. This is the kind of thing you should be doing to keep the perspective steady.

>Let’s do it-//

Use a dash or double hyphen here. Dashes actually work better with FiMFic's formatting, but you had some double hyphens last chapter.

>I did for you//

Missing word.

>the long journey took its toll when you were pulling such a heavy load//

Why do you need to say "you" here? It's true of Trixie, so just use her. It can be a tricky business to address the audience.

>yawned tiredly//

Beware over-explaining things, and adverbs are a common culprit for this. You've already described her as fatigued, so the reader's already going to assume the yawn means she's tired. There's no point in having that "tiredly" there.

>silently wondering what was going to happen//

Similar deal. She clearly doesn't know what's happening, so you don't need to spell that out for the reader.

>Sunburst shielded his eyes, expecting the worst.//

Here's another spot where you need to couch this as Starlight's interpretation of what Sunburst must be thinking.

>hovered in front Trixie//

Missing word.

>After getting some food in her belly, she could do with a nap.//

The "she could do with a nap" is the narrator vocalizing her thought. That's fine. Now look at this:
>Hey, there’s Starlight! What are the odds I’d see her here? I’ve been so busy with my tour that I haven’t written to her in awhile.//
This is also Trixie's thought, but you're presenting it as a quote. It's odd to have thoughts done both ways. The former is more suited to a limited narration (essentially what you have), and the latter more toward an omniscient narration. When you already have a mechanism to present thought more personally, why fall back on quotes? It's really only necessary if there's some reason it has to be made clear that the thought happened precisely that way, word for word. Otherwise, let the narration express the thought. Something like:
>Starlight was here! What were the odds Trixie would see her here? Her tour had occupied so much of her time that she hadn't taken any of it to write Starlight in a while.//
And note two things about that. One, I cut out a couple of the boring "to be" verbs (active verb choice is always more interesting), and "a while" isn't the same thing grammatically as "awhile." You have it as the object of a preposition, so it needs to be a noun form, not an adverb.

>A low cost game for a high cost prize?//

When you use a multi-word phrase as a single modifier for what follows, hyphenate it, unless the first word is an -ly adverb. So this would be low-cost and high-cost.

>a look of mild annoyance on the mare’s face//

Remember your perspective. Why would Starlight refer to herself as "the mare"? You don't mentally call yourself "the person," do you? Also, you should really try to avoid directly naming emotions like this. Let the characters' actions and appearance speak for themselves. Think of them like actors. One doesn't come out on stage and announce that he's annoyed. You figure that out on your own by watching him. That's how we read people in real life, so it feels more natural when an audience has to interpret it the same way for a character on stage or in writing.

>were-”//

Another spot where a hyphen isn't appropriate for a cutoff.

>It makes my head hurt.//

Really? She's pretty smart. Maybe she just doesn't want it to soak up their time, but I doubt she'd find it intrinsically annoying,

>They’d seen the tracks stretching across Corrals of Fun; circling the entire park.//

For a semicolon to be properly used, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentence stand as complete. But the part after it here couldn't. A comma is fine here.

>The two trotted up to the queue and found their place in the steadily moving line. Their turn came and they took a seat in one of the train cars, waiting for the rest of the passengers to board.//

You fall into this trap sometimes. I've just waited until now to say something about it. This is incredibly mundane. It's not interesting, it doesn't add to the setting, it doesn't advance the plot. Nothing. It's exactly what the reader would expect to happen, so you can let it go unsaid, unless you want it to accomplish one of those things. So I'd recommend one or more of these: 1) cut it, 2) use the opportunity to give me some richer description of the scenery Starlight's looking at while this goes on, 3) spice it up with some language showing how Starlight feels about all this, or 4) let these characters have some sort of interaction while they're waiting so that you can explore their character a bit or work toward advancing the plot. You do this a fair amount in the story, where there's just this dispassionate listing of actions, one after the other. You have this narrative style you've chosen where we get a front-row set to Starlight's thoughts and impressions, so keep checking in with them. Don't let it get bland. Keep her train of thought going.

>Thinking of my friends, architecture and entertainment seem more like earth pony specialities.//

She forgot about Trixie awful quickly.

>one hundred foot drop//

Go back to that explanation os when to hyphenate phrases. This should be "one-hundred-foot drop."

>Starlight countered//

Missing period.

>“It smells like-”//

Another spot that shouldn't be a hyphen.

>Yakyakistonian//

If his follows Earth convention of countries with similar names, that would be Yakyakistani.

>Which reminded her; she’d been so nervous about meeting Sunburst that morning that she hadn’t been able to keep down much of a breakfast.//

Another misused semicolon. In this case, you're clarifying or defining what she was reminded of, so a colon would be appropriate.

I realize you didn't want to write out a massive chapter, but it might help if you gave the sense there was more to it that you left out. A time skip scene break, some instances where Starlight missed out on what the guide was saying because she wasn't paying attention or something. As it is, they only passed like four attractions. That doesn't make for much of a tour.

>The only problem, Trixie wondered, was how?//

Similar to what I was saying about limited narrators before, you don't need to say Trixie wondered this. It's already implied, just because she's the perspective character.

>where there were going to eat//

Typo.

>The magician//

Similar problem as before. This means Trixie is choosing to call herself "the magician" in her own head, which is weird. People don't do that.

>Maud blinked slowly once, her way of expressing surprise.//

How does Trixie know that about her? She might surmise it from Maud's answer, but this comes before Maud gives it.

>She knew how scary Starlight could be when provoked.//

Same as the earlier "wonder." The narration is already presumed to be things Trixie knows. If they weren't, the narrator couldn't say them. So just say that Starlight could be angry when provoked. That inherently means Trixie knows it.

>silently wondering if she should be freaked out about Maud's habit of talking to rocks//

And here you go with the wonder again. Just have the narration ask the question. That already expresses it as wonder.

>For my greatest trick, the Great and Powerful Trixie will make sure they kiss!//

This is kind of a reservation I have about the story. Trixie seems to see getting them to kiss as a goal separate from any meaning. She should be thinking about doing so bcause she presumes that's what Starlight wants. But I really don't know why Starlight wants it, so the romance needs some work from her end as well.

That's probably the biggest thing here. The point of a romance story is to convince the reader that these characters are a good match, have genuine feelings for each other, and belong together. So far, I'm just thrown into this with assurances they do, but aside from some blushing and giggling, it's not apparent. What do they actually like about each other? Be specific. Have Starlight reminisce about a couple of significant times she found Sunburst endearing. Real relationships have a give and take. The people roughly want to be equals. There are things they expect to get out of the relationship and things they expect to contribute. What are those?

And that's the short version. For the long one, which is highly recommended reading, look up Aragon's home page. He's linked a series of blogs on how to write good romance, and it covers what you really need to be including here. As it is, I have no reason to believe these two love each other beyond the narrator just assuring me they do. Demonstrate it.

This is a cute story so far, and there's a good setup for how this cast will interact, but it needs something more on the romance front.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3323

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Rarity’s pleads//

Pleas or pleadings.

>“Yeah,” Rainbow shrugged.//

You have a non-speaking action for your dialogue tag.

>“It’s not quite weekly, then, Darling.”//

That's just a generic term of endearment. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>“…she feels she really failed her parents’ happiness.”//

You're not picking up a previous sentence held suspended, so capitalize this one.

>Rarity liked to see her life through the lens of a teenage drama series—light-hearted, sometimes petty, and surprisingly good at handling darker topics.//

Okay, backtracking a bit. You start the scene with this, which is definitely in Rarity's train of thought. And it continues this way. But not long after, we get this:
>Maybe it was how convinced Rarity sounded—as convinced as an old cat lady is in her independence—or maybe it was Fluttershy’s own consideration that made her want to believe what she was hearing twice.//
This sure sounds like Fluttershy's perspective. It'd be odd for her to note how she sounded in this case, and she wouldn't know what Fluttershy believed. But you only stay there one sentence. Soon enough, you're back with Rarity. There's not a good reason to switch perspective here, and even if there were, it would need to be handled more smoothly. You ought to just stick with Rarity.

>“Of course, Dear.”//

Another term of endearment that shouldn't be capitalized.

>Cause//

Needs a leading apostrophe since you're eliding "because."

>know?’.//

Extraneous period.

>15//

That's a short enough number to write out.

>Chopin inspired ballad//

Hyphenate the first two words.

>the chamber choir//

I'm no aware of anything Chopin wrote for more than one voice, and there aren't even very many of those. It's certainly not a genre Chopin was known for.

You like to do these long stretches of unattributed dialogue, and it can get confusing to figure out which characters are speakin which lines.

>decent to Hell//

descent

>death and Hell is//

Number mismatch.

>take that math!//

Seems like you need a comma for direct address here.

>“CATCH ME YOU IDIOT!”//

And that definitely does.

>later.’.//

Extraneous period.

>less-//

You have a lot of these spots where you need a proper dash for a cutoff.

>Just imagine if our missions were just//

Watch the close word repetition. This is a word many authors tend to overuse anyway.

>The latter//

The latter of whom? The only pair you mention are Rarity and Fluttershy, but you mention Dash after that, so it confuses the issue.

>“But if I steal what has been stolen, I have still the sin of stealing.”//

And I have no idea which one says this. It sounds more like Rarity, it makes more sense for Dash, and Fluttershy is the most recent character indicated. So... I'm lost. I guess it's Fluttershy? But that that's a rather abrupt perspective change from Rarity noting she had to track her lies.

One other thing about perspective. In the scenes where Dash holds it, the narration sounds identical in tone and word choice to the scenes where Rarity does. Yet note how different their dialogue sounds. There's a disconnect in narrative voice.

>“Umm,” Rainbow had to think hard for a moment.//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>Rarity quite liked the setting: she felt the tea, still steaming in the refreshingly chilly air, absorbed a particularly pleasing sweetness, there and then. It balanced out well with the aftertaste of a well executed tea hijacking.//

Here, you're in Rarity's viewpoint.
>Remembering was so hard already, but Rarity talked about boys all the time.//
And just a few paragraphs later, you've jumped over to Dash's head.

You're falling prey to something that plagues authors, and I really can't figure out why so many fall into the trap.
>Rarity leaned back and took a sip of her tea.//
>Rarity took another sip of her tea//
>She finished her tea with one more timely, dainty sip.//
For some reason, authors lose all imagination when characters are sharing drinks, and all they can think to have the characters so is some variation on "take another sip." Sometimes they use a different verb than that, but "sip" is by far the most common. Think about when you're sharing a drink with someone. What other things do you do with it? I could recommend a couple of stories that do a good job with this if you need examples.

>Technically, we got the money through the ring through illegal means.//

I think you meant tha first "through" to be something else.

>Dearest//

Don't captialize this. I'm not going to mark all these generic terms of endearment. Just do a sweep for them.

>“Well, when you put it that way,” shrugged Rainbow, satisfied enough.//

>“Right,” Rainbow grinned.//
Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>3 hour//

three-hour

>bit more, they had spent a bit//

Watch the close word repetition. And you didn't stay in Dash's perspective long. You're back in Rarity's head now. If it's worth going to Dash at all (and it probably isn't), surely it's worth staying there a while.

>Rainbow could imagine her one the other end of the line//

I think you meant "on." And are yachts going to be their specialty? It seems odd that both capers have involved them so far.

>fowl//

I've never heard this as an insult. Are you sure you didn't mean foul?

>I just let her borrow a pen from my pencil case and she must’ve liked yours. She just forgot to return it, probably.//

"Just" is a word many authors overuse without realizing. You have 36 in this chapter alone, which is a ton for the word count. I see 7 of them on the same screenful around this.

>It’s bad manner//

I've only ever heard that as plural "manners."

>Functions class//

I have zero idea what this is. Be prepared that much of your audience won't understand it. I asked a British friend, and he'd never heard of it, either.

>make up//

You keep writing this as two words, but for cosmetics, it's one.

>wedding-//

Use a dash. This is also something I'm not going to keep marking.

>Still, I’ll never understand why popular girls can’t just use pencil cases; she wouldn’t even need your pen if all hers weren’t for her eyes.//

Usually, it's the limited narrative voice sounding off, but here, it's the diaogue. This doesn't sound like something Dash would say, and I can't imagine her using a semicolon.

>like the rhythm or rowing//

I think you meant "of."

>The sharp turn in tone from self-praising to quiet reminiscent//

Kind of repetitive use of "sharp" with how you recently described her smile, and you're not making a thematic connection. And you need a noun in this syntaxm so use "reminiscence."

>didn’t go unnoticed to Rainbow//

didn’t go unnoticed by Rainbow

>DARLING!//

>everything?//
When you hae a word italicized for emphasis, include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>nicked//

I get that's a common British word, but it's not something Dash has ever said. Unless you're reimagining her as British.

>And, I know//

No reason to have a comma there.

>but,” Rainbow shrugged//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>hoof beats//

hoofbeats

>“It scares me to say it,” lifting her head, Rarity pushed her hair back again.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Rainbow stopped spinning, looking a little sick.//

Your perspective is bouncing around in this scene again. This has to be Rarity's viewpoint, since Rainbow can't see herself to evaluate how she looks, but then you have other places that can't be Dash's viewpoint. Keep the viewpoint steady.

>Now that we’re cool,” Rainbow stood up//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Rarity would miss their commodore//

Are you sure you didn't mean camaraderie? I can't imagine what a commodore has to do with this.

>lifting her nose up with uppity//

The syntax doesn't make sense here. "Uppity" is an adjective, but it's in a spot where a noun needs to be.

>old fashion restaurant//

This could make sense as stated, but I wonder if you meant old-fashioned.

>As the second and final crescendo rushed in, Rarity pulled the glass away, idly stirring the shimmering drink as she looked into the distance behind aviator sunglasses.//

It's awkward to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence. It's repetitive structurally, and they fight each other for the sentence's timeline.

>glass’//

glass’s

>“I’m not—“ she paused//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>mermaid-coloured//

Huh? What color is a mermaid?

>Rolling her eyes again and rolling//

You had this same close repetition earlier in the scene.

>thump//

Don't italicize these sound effects. You've already done that a number of times. All the ones you've used are legitimate words. Italicizing them makes it seem like they're supposed to have siginficance.

>against on//

You only need one of these.

>maniac laughter//

You sure you didn't mean maniacal?

>twenty one//

twenty-one

>three month difference//

You're using the whole phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate "three-month."

>10//

Spell it out.

>And,” Rainbow pushed up straight//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>telling one friend that another was dangerousto be around, was terribly tough//

No reason to have a comma there.

>about caring about//

Close word repetition.

>rubbed of on her a bit//

Typo.

>it confirm Fluttershy's fears//

Typo.

>benefit it the doubt//

benefit of the doubt

>Dash,” taking Dash’s hands, Fluttershy faintly noticed how rough they felt in hers./

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>I’m thinking of—“//

Note that dashes have a tendency to break smart quotes. It's given you a set of opening quotes here, whereas you need closing ones. You can paste in the right kind.

>so,” she shrugged//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>at all time//

at all times

>an indignant, ‘oof’//

The "an" makes this not a direct quote, and so it doesn't have to follow all the rules of quotes. It doesn't have to be capitalized, which you have right, and it doesn't need the comma.

>I was thinking—“ she held the ring up, and it sparkled in the low lamplight, “—of//

You finally got one of these right. There are several ways of handling non-speaking narrative actions, and this is one. But the narrative action doesn't take end punctuation in this format, except possibly for an exclamation mark or question mark, if appropriate. So drop the comma.

Okay, this is good so far, but it does have a few problems. It has more editing problems that your previous submission, and it consistently has a couple of those, like using narrative actions as speech tags and some wavering perspective. That's the stuff that I really would like to see fixed up, and fortunately, it's on the easy side to address.

On the story side, it's just barely starting to feel like there's an actual plot. The sentence-level writing is great, and the character voicing is good, except for some slips in narrative tone and word choice for Dash's perspective, but I spent the whole first chapter wondering when we'd get to knowing what the story was even about. And I still don't.

Rarity and Dash are pulling these heists for the thrill of it. There's no direction to this, no ultimate goal they have, and they're not set up to have a character development arc so far. There's nothing to push them through some sort of change. Fluttershy could serve that function, but she hasn't yet, if indeed she will. It sure seems like she has an agenda, but just like Rarity's overall one, it has no focus I can see. So I know what everyone's doing, but I don't have the first clue why.

One of the biggest questions to ask about a story is: so what? What does it matter that the events of the story happened? Do characters change as a result, or do they set up and resolve a conflict? I don't even have a hint of where the story's going, except that maybe Fluttershy will try to influence Dash to stop.

The thing is that your extended synopsis you gave us does promise a well-defined plot arc. It even sounds like an interesting one. The regular synopsis doesn't, though, so I don't know how an average reader would know this was going somewhere. They could trust you're a good enough writer to come through for them, and personally, I do think you're a good enough writer to make this work, but just be aware of how this appears to a reader new to you. You've created kind of an uphill battle to keep them invested in the story, but that's your risk to take. I just think it'd help if you did start bringing in elements of the overall plot by now. Sweetie Belle's barely been mentioned, after all.

In the end, I really am only looking for those mechanical and perspective fixes, and they won't take you long. Just go through the submission form when you're ready again, and choose "back from Mars" so we know this only needs a cursory look.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3364

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>She had done this?//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>That’s how long time had passed//

That's a strange phrasing. I've only ever heard it as "how much time."

>We only just got here?//

Why is this a question?

>Celestia lead Twilight//

The past tense is "led."

>Has something happened in Canterlot that ponies don’t know about.//

And why isn't that a question?

>“Let’s not worry ourselves with it,” Celestia brushed it off.//

I pointed out some typos and mechanical things last time, at least through the first two chapters, and you've only fixed about half of them, if that many. This is one that keeps popping up here and there. You're using a non-speaking action, but you're punctuating and capitalizing it like it's a speech tag. Either that action neds to be a separate sentence, you need to add a speaking action in front of it, or you need to use the dash format I showed you last time.

Authors of intermediate experience tend to lean on a couple of elements too much. They're nicely descriptive, but they don't turn up much in everyday conversation, so they stand out easily, and it doesn't take much before they become repetitive. One of those is the participial phrase. And it's not just the repetition of having them at all; it's employing them in the same place sentence after sentence. For example, all of these are within a span of just 3 paragraphs, and they all come at the nds of sentences:
>carrying a bag full of gems//
>sitting down on his small bed and put a few gems in his mouth// (and in this one, the verb forms are inconsistent)
>reminded of another pressing question that had been on her mind since her ascension//
>facing the dragon//

>the moon—shaped like a slice of apple pie this night//

How is that even possible?

>Beyond that door ahead lie the key that would change her life forever.//

Lay, not lie.

>Even the door hinges were made of crystal, and slid open without a single creak.//

You have a number of spots like this where you don't need the comma, since it's just a compound verb. There's only one subject that gets both verbs. Commas are used when there are verbs that each belong to a different subject.

>And there, on the nightstand, was the price.//

I believe you meant prize.

>She did the first thing that popped into head//

Missing word.

>“I think I know why,” the baby dragon spoke up, pointing to the night stand, absent of its crown.//

He sure seems calm about this. And then you have Sunset's quoted thought in the same paragraph, which is equivalent to dialogue. You shouldn't have dialogue from more than one character in a single paragraph.

>she dashed passed doors//

past

>The room she needed to go//

Missing word.

>to stop in her track//

The standard phrasing is plural: in her tracks.

>spells design to cancel out//

designed

>glass “No immediate danger…//

Missing a period on one sentence and closing quotes on the other.

>others, like Sunset Shimmer, succumbs to the call of power//

You have a plural subject (others) with a singular verb (succumbs).

>Chapter Tree//

I can't tell whether you're making a joke or if this is a typo.

>the her upper body//

Wording is off.

>hide ones//

hind

>So this is how Spike pick things up.//

Typo.

>every single one of them were wearing//

was

>had ran//

had run

>grab it, then run as fast as she could back through the portal. But Celestia might grab//

Watch the close word repetition.

>burglar the thing//

burgle

>W-what option.//

Why isn't that a question?

>to whomever wins the title//

That's actually a spot for "whoever."

>I can’t say certain//

for certain

>his daughter is home school//

schooled

>Me and Luna//

Luna and I

>waxing poetics//

poetic

>It just too convenient//

Typo.

>protege//

She's female, so protegee.

>make due//

make do

>Ironic, isn’t it; a world of magical creation, where its dominant species has to live without it.//

What comes after the semicolon is a sentence fragment, so the semicolon isn't used correctly.

>How could you be so sure I’d be the one to come after you.//

That's a question.

>The dog I am?//

I don't know what this means. If it's some sort of epithet, then I don't know why it's a question.

>Images of Twilight pulling at her mane and yelling at bookshelves came to mind, and she blushed.//

This sounds really external to her for the perspective.

>todays lunch//

Missing apostrophe.

>and,” Spike helpfully propped up on Twilight’s leg, “I wanted you to meet my dog.”//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>It’s not everyday people bring their dog to school//

"Everyday" and "every day" don't mean the same thing. You have the wrong one here.

>oh, and the Fall Formal. Sunset Shimmer wins every year anyway//

Sunset wins what? The Fall Formal is a dance. Anyone who's seen the movie will know what you're talking about, but you never actually say it.

>Just thinking about learning more about the world was nearly enough make her forget about her mission.//

That's rather extreme to use "about" 3 times in one sentence. Can't you rephrase that?

>and streamers and everywhere//

Extraneous word.

>stage.”Just//

Missing space, and it's made your quotes backward.

>mistaken…” the door suddenly opened to the gymnasium, and through it came… “there//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>white, plain shirt, blue tattered jeans//

See ths inconsistency here? You twice have a color followed by a condition, but you treat them differently with commas.

>So, uh, if I wanted to appeal to the athletes, who’d I talk to.//

That should be a question.

>all.“ Alright…//

The space and quotation marks are in the wrong order.

>all five of them goes//

Number mismatch.

>I would advice caution//

advise

>had literally ran//

had literally run

>I’m not the brightest students around//

Typo.

>fell into steps//

fell into step

>Stepping outside, the sun was considerably lower now//

This says that the sun stepped outside.

>was the was the same//

Typo.

>gets on my nerve//

nerves

>cooking dinner to your family//

cooking dinner for your family

>get it touch with ya//

in

>you haven’t see it yet//

seen

>Sunsets voice//

Missing apostrophe.

>we at CHS has to offer//

"We has" is an incorrect conjugation.

>would jumps//

Typo.

>wreck havoc//

wreak

>squatting down to giving him a scratch//

give

>Pinkie and Fluttershy doesn’t//

don't

>I like coming here and watch Rainbow Dash play//

The verb forms don't match.

>Have you never even talk to each other?//

And that verb isn't right, either.

>I’m almost peddling backwards.//

Homophone confusion. This means she's selling something. You want pedaling.

>pizazz//

pizzazz

>putting on the breaks/

brakes

>Bullies like this version of Rainbow Dash was the reason//You have a plural subject (bullies) with a singular verb (was).


>Let’s give Sunset Shimmer the what for!//

I've never seen that phrased with "the."

>“I-I didn’t know you were just acting…” At least I should’ve… I’m so sorry!”//

I'm guessing that middle set of quotation marks shouldn't be there.

>never coming up and talk to me//

Verb forms don't match.

>your not a ten-year-old girl anymore//

Typo.

>At least Fluttershy step up when it counts//

Verb form is off.

>he simplest assumption might be the correct one//

Typo.

>played an important roll//

role

>How’d you know Apple Acre made cider?//

Sweet Apple Acres

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3462

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

This is something I caution many writers about: avoid "to be" verbs whenever you can, especially at the beginning and end of a story. Your first paragraph started out fine enough, with only one such verb through most of it, but then you pile up 4 more in the last few sentences. This creates a very stagnant feel right when you're trying to make your story look very interesting to a reader. Lots of times, it's not hard to rephrase. Take this sentence:
>That’s what my dad would have believed//
If instead you say:
>My dad would have believed that//
What do you lose? And it's more active language.

Then your second paragraph as one in its only sentence. The third paragraph is well done! But in the fourth, you're back at it, with 5 of them in just the first line.

So I guess Flash is bi? Because he was definitely flirting with Twilight in the first EqG movie.

>“By the way, Princess Twilight is gonna be coming down for a couple of weeks, so get ready to have Flurry stolen from you all the time,” Flash Sentry chuckled//

"Chuckle is borderline as a speaking verb, as it's intransitive, but at least keep it to what he would actually laugh while saying. In other words, keep the quote short for a verb like that. It feels very unnatural to have him chuckling out that entire thing.

>found.” I replied, a wide smile reached over my face//

Punctuation, typo.

For that matter, going back to your fourth paragraph, you don't seem to be settling into a tense. You keep shifting between past and present in the narration.

>did anypony hear it?//

Capitalization.

>Is anypony putting the dots together? Are they looking at us?//

You're switching tenses again. This would be fine in present if you wanted it to be a quoted thought, but then italicize it. However, quoted thought is usually not a good idea in a limited narration like this, since the narration is already supposed to be his thoughts. Presenting it as a quote adds extra distance from the narrator that really shouldn't be there. So it's probably best to keep it as narration, but then it needs to match the narration's prevailing tense.

>looking at us? All I wanted was to look //

Watch for close word repetition like that.

>what other ponies think//

More present tense. I can't keep marking all these, but you need to go through and scan for them.

>reorganise.” I said//

Punctuation. You're consistently missing this as well. There's a guide to punctuating and capitalizing dialogue at the top of this thread.

>have a quick peak//

Peek/peak confusion.

>Sigh….//

Just use three dots. Four is for a specific nonfiction usage.

>Numerically//

Why is this capitalized?

>Admittedly, I was blushing like crazy, but my head sank and my voice lost a lot of volume in an irrational attempt to make sure nopony heard me, he only smiled harder though.//

I can tolerate some comma splices as taking on his voice, but the one at the last comma here is really awkward.

>it...being//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>my-//

Please use a proper dash.

Basically, this needs a fair amount of editing work, but I don't want to get bogged down in the details, so I'm just going to skim the rest and only stop for new issues.

Watch for places like this:
>My face had nothing but horror painted on it.//
It doesn't make sense for the perspctive. How can he see his own face to make this evaluation? And why is that what's cluing him in to how he feels anyway? There should be far more readily readable symptoms.

>sosososososowrongandI’msodamnsorry//

Don't do this. Consider that the effect you're trying to create is that he says this very fast, but what actually happens is you make it more difficult to read, so it actually makes it slower to parse. If you want him to speak rapidly, just say that he's doing so, plus the italics already add emphasis.

>...//

This may cut it as video game dialogue, but in writing, it's unnecessarily vague. The fact that a pause is happening is relatively unimportant. What's important is what happens during the pause, and you're skipping that.

>“Sunny, I’m so sorry//

You have an extra line break before this.

>I’m here for you, sunny//

Capitalization.

>Sigh//

Missing end punctuation.

>It’s okay Sunburst,//

Missing comma for direct address.

>Not out of anger, or spite, but out of embarrassment; shame I guess.//

For a semicolon to be used correctly, you should be able to replace it with a period, but what comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence.

>“Hi dad.” I croaked//

A couple of punctuation errors, but what's new here is that family relations get capitalized when effectively used as names.

>I-I’ve got someone for you to- To meet Dad.//

When it's still part of the same sentence, don't capitalize after a dash.

>So. Damn, Much.//

You're missing a number of quotation marks through this monologue. If one paragraph ends with his speech and the next immediately picks up with more, it's fin to leave the quotation marks of the end of the first paragraph, but you still have to refresh the opening quotes with each new paragraph.

One word that authors tend to use a lot without realizing how much is "just." You have it 38 times in your story. That's quite a lot for this word count. You don't want writing tics like that standing out to readers.

>Shutupppppp//

I don't know how you prolong a "p" sound. Without spitting on someone, anyway. Are you sure this is how you want him pronouncing it?

Okay, we occasionally get complaints that there's not enough M/M shipping in the fandom, so I'm trying to give you as much leeway as I can, but there's just not enough here. There are a few main issues.

First, I don't have a basis for why these two are in love. I know nothing about why they like each other, what each one thinks they give and take from a relationship, etc. Rather than go into a long speech about this, I'll just refer you to Aragon. He has a series of blogposts linked off his homepage discussing how to write convincing romance. We need some more here, or it's just the reader having to take your word for it that these characters are in love.

Second, there's no conflict. The whole thing is about Sunburst trying to overcome his fear, yet we never see any basis for it. He's convinced that he's going to be met with disapproval from any public signs of affection. But none of that ever happens. He seems to think that gay relationships are stigmatized. But I never see any evidence of that. Everything they do is steady progress to the goal, and aside from Sunburst's lack of confidence, there are no obstacles for anyone to struggle against. Everything they have to work through turns out fine on the first try.

And third, this is an extremely common plot. Original romance is hard to write, but those first two items are already handicapping you, since they're also very common missteps that writers make. You have to do something to stand out from the crowd, and that can be a very authentically rendered conflict, exceptional writing, taking a fresh angle, etc., but you're falling into most of the traps. You do have M/M shipping making this move a little to the unusual side, but that alone isn't enough.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3463

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>As the charge nurse//

Pretty soon to repeat that already. I think readers will already pick up that you're talking about her duties here. It's like you're smacking the reader over the head and saying, "Hey! Notice this!"

So you have 3 paragraphs of intro material, and in it, you use 12 "to be" verbs. That's a very stagnant way to start your story. Not much is happening. I bet you can rephrase most of those with active verbs. The stretch starting with "If she had any strategies at all" through the end of that paragraph is actually pretty good. It uses active verbs for things that lots of people wouldn't as a reflex, and it makes for a much more interesting read as a result.

>“Aaugh!” The draconequus groaned//

I can't tell whether you meant that to be a speech tag. If so, it shouldn't be capitalized.

>could have sworn she hear her desk shrieking//

Typo.

>With Luna as her witness, Amethyst could have sworn she hear her desk shrieking in agony, cracking and shuddering under the strain; which wasn’t really surprising given that Discord’s dictionary was roughly the size of Harry the Bear.//

A semicolon should be used such that you could replace it with a period. What comes after it here couldn't stand as a complete sentence, though. A comma or dash would be fine there, depending on what rhythm you want.

>Snapping his fingers again, the pages of the dictionary rapidly fluttered backwards//

This says the pages snapped his fingers.

>if anything is weak and helpless here//

Needs a comma here at... well, here.

>The purple unicorn//

You're using Amethyst as your perspective character, so she's the one choosing to call herself this. That's just weird. It's like you mentally referring to yourself as "the fanfiction-writing human."

>the little unicorn//

This seems to be from his perspective much more than hers.

>fifteen minute break//

fifteen-minute break

>“I can take my break right now, Discord, if that’s what you would prefer. I am at a natural gap in the schedule…”//

Looks like you have an inadvertent line break here.

>muttering something under her breath//

This doesn't quite work with the perspective either. She's essentially the narrator, yet the narrator's phrasing this as if he doesn't know exactly what she said. That means she doesn't know what she said, which isn't true.

>need to wait a moment. I need//

Watch the close word repetition.

>was two IV poles with drip lines//

You have a singular verb with a plural subject.

>the small pegasus//

Now that you've begun a new scene, I'm not sure who holds the perspective, but none of the characters used so far would plausibly refer to Fluttershy like this, so it doesn't worj for the perspective.

>with a small smile//

That's pretty close after the last use of "smile."

>the lake situated behind the hospital surrounded by a grove//

The phrasing here lack clarity. I gather you're saying there's a lake behind the hospital, and that lake is surrounded by trees. But what it more readily says is that there are multiple hospitals, and the hospital surrounded by trees has a lake behind it.

>present..//

Extraneous punctuation.

>Fluttershy rolled her eyes.//

She just did that 3 paragraphs ago. I'm betting you didn't notice you repeated yourself, but if it was on purpose, you have to do something to acknowledge the repetition, like adding "again."

>because— ” Discord trailed off//

You have an extraneous space between the dash and quotation marks. And Discord didn't trail off. That would be an ellipsis. A dash is an abrupt cutoff. For that matter, you don't need the narration repeating what the punctuation already tells me, no matter which one of those it is.

>mumbling something Fluttershy couldn’t quite make out.//

This is the first time in the scene it's apparent Fluttershy is your perspective character. Make that clear from the first sentence or two. You don't want a nebulous viewpoint going on this long. This also means it was Fluttershy earlier describing herself as "the small pegasus."

>“Yes… I’m sure he is guarding your ‘body’” Discord muttered.//

Missing comma at the end of the quote.

>The only visible symbols, were K, La, H, Ge, M, and L.//

That first comma has no reason to be there. And if there's a joke buried in here, it's gone over my head. To my knowledge, there are no elements M or L, but that doesn't help me decipher the joke.

>he rubbed his chin a forepaw//

Missing word.

>Those bluebelles’ compliment your tail too, the blue really sets off your natural coloration.//

I don't know why that apostrophe is there, the comma is a splice, and you've confused compliment with complement.

>Poisonous Joke//

It's just poison joke.

>“Oh, no reason…’ Discord trailed off//

You've opened with double quotes but closed with a single. And it's redundant to say he trailed off when the ellipsis already means that.

>If Discord didn't know any better, she might have been counting to herself.//

Here, you seem to have jumped into Discord's perspective.

>slogan. ”//

>say— “//
>“ —and finally//
Extraneous spacenext to the quotation marks. That second one has also made the quotation marks backward.

>the wilting draconequus//

That's an awfully clinical and external reference for her to use about someone she knows well. Do you use similar terms in your own thoughts for your good friends?

>a look of shocked disbelief//

How can she see her own face to make this assessment? You have to think about how the perspective character would perceive the things the narration says. You don't have to see yourself to know you're shocked. There are far more immediate symptoms.

>Discord’s gave a little shudder.//

Discord’s what gave a little shudder?

>the yellow pegasus//

You're having her describe herself in a very external way again.

>Discord couldn’t see her face, but if the way her ears were flicking and how her shoulders tensed were any indication, Fluttershy was not in a good mood.//

Now you've popped over to Discord's perspective, but it doesn't accomplish anything vital to be there. It just makes the narrative voice harder to follow.

>and— “//

>“ —Discord//
Extraneous spaces, backward quotes.

>Her heart ached to see Discord miserable like that//

This is stated kind of clinically. Let the narrative tone carry it. Have the narration sound like someone with their heart breaking, both in what it says and how it says it.

>well being//

well-being

>teen aged//

teenaged

There are a few pervasive things, like several of the mechanical problems I had to point out multiple times. The bigger issues are with perspective, both that it jumps around a fair amount, but also in certain phrasings that don't make sense with the perspective. If you can tune those up (and, hopefully, keep those lessons learned going forward into the as yet unwritten chapters), I'd be happy to post this. The rest of the plot you've laid out doesn't sound problematic on its face, but of course there's always potential differences between the plan and the actual executed product. I trust you can handle it, so just rein in those few things. I'd only need to skim it for those specific issues, so you can mark it as "back from Mars" when you're ready to resubmit.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3489

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>pouring over a text//

poring

>Buzz off, Princess Luna. I'm not dreaming and you have no authority here. I'm busy.//

You're using a third-person limited narration, not first person. The first sentence here could reasonably exist in either, but the second explicitly says "I." Either switch it to third-person pronouns (and rephrase as necessary to make it sound good) or make this a quoted thought by italicizing it or putting it in single quotation marks and possibly tagging it as a thought. Really, the former is the best method, as presenting quoted thought in a limited narration kind of defeats the purpose of using a limited narrator in the first place.

>Yes, Ma'am//

Ma'am is just a generic term. It souldn't be capitalized. This is a recurring issue.

>your Highness//

The "your" gets capitalized too.

>Their visitor left.//

Honestly, the way you keep having very abrupt time skips mid-scene like this, it's very reminiscent of a trollfic. It's also a symptom of this story feeling extremely fast-paced.

Something I want you to try: read the first three pages of your story, and skip over any sentence that has dialogue in it. Only read the ones that are purely narrative. They're incredibly repetitive in structure. It's rare to see one start with anything but the subject. Many of them, particularly in the dialogue-heavy portions, are extremely short and have the same inflection. It gets very plodding to read. Having the dialogue mixed in does help mask the effect, but it can't eliminate it entirely. If you don't throw some variety in there, it has this subtle way of making the writing sound dull.

>heavily wooded, with heavy//

Watch that close repetition.

>T-twilight//

Normally, this is how you'd handle capitalization in a stutter, but when you have a proper noun or something else that has to be capitalized anyway, then do so for all instances of it in the stutter.

>Spike had known up front it was a losing battle.//

You've done a good job of keeping to Twilight's perspective, but this sure smacks of being in Spike's.

>Came a new noise rustling and swishing from the left.//

There have been a couple times you've used that verb now without a subject. It's really strange. Is that a regional usage or something?

>in embarrassed surprise//

Whenever you find yourself directly identifying a character's emotion, instead think of how you can get the character to demonstrate that emotion without ever mentioning it. What does Starlight actually do that would lead an observer to think she was embarrassed and surprised?

>making a lot of fuss about he was going to find and beat up this ghost thingie//

Seems like there should be a "how" in there.

>said to me 'Let's//

>I said 'Trixie//
Needs a comma. Just because it's a quote nested in another quote doesn't mean it behaves by different rules.

>"y'know//

Capitalization.

>four mile hike//

four-mile

>What did you just see.//

Isn't that a question?

>dosie-doed//

do-si-doed

>toward the roadway as Twilight started toward//

Watch the close repetition.

>started back//

You've used both of those fairly recently, too.

>Starlight's eyes narrowed as she began to follow the princess.//

This should still be Twilight's perspective. Why would she refer to herself as "the princess"?

>Eastern//

Why is that capitalized?

>A silent nod to Princess Celestia, who made sure the sun rose for everypony (weather permitting).//

The sun rises regardless of the weather.

>Twilight might have been her mentor, but, hey. Zecora.//

The narrative voice you're taking for Starlight is identical to the one you took for Twilight. They should sound unique, so that a reader could determine one from the other solely by tone. You do give them a little bit of distinctiveness in their dialogue, but it's missing from their narrative voices.

>No syrup; just butter. Twilight.//

The semicolon isn't really used right, and I have no idea what that second sentence is supposed to be doing.

>join her guest for a glass of apple cider. Spike himself joined//

Close repetition.

In fact, that paragraph is kind of bizarre. I noted before how you were employing some pretty drastic time skips. Yet here, you're going into mundane, irrelevant detail.

>But verrry interesting//

Missing period.

>Twi, why don't you go take a quick nap.//

That's also a question.

>one time student//

one-time

>Mustang bothers//

Typo.

>The princess eyes//

Looks like you meant to have a possessive there.

>That afternoon//

Seriously, with the time skips. Why don't you use scene breaks for these? That would also make the perspective changes less jarring.

>Spike didn't complain. Not that anybody noticed.//

Well, then this necessitates a jump to Spike's perspective. You'd been in Twilight's, but jf she didn't notice it, a narrator in her viewpoint can't either.

>Sugar Cube//

Canon tends to make that one word, but in any case, it's a generic nickname and wouldn't be capitalized.

>Saint Michael//

If you want to do this, I won't stop you, but it means there's a ton of back story missing as to who this is to them and what being a saint even means in this world.

>No one paid attention.//

Whoever's holding the perspective must have...

>She held up a hoof.//

Looks like you meant to have another line break here.

>As they rose they thinned into glowing threads, and as they rose further, Twilight could make out phantom eyes and mouths just taking shape//

There's an inconsistency here in setting off the "as" clauses with commas.

It's a little off-putting that the entire aftermath is told as a narrative summary instead of getting to see any of it happen "live."

>ways, Starlight Glimmer on her way//

Close repetition.

>back to the Changelings//

You mentioned something about changelings before, and I thought it might have been a throwaway joke, but there's actually something to this? Why was she there? It seems pretty irrelevant to the story, yet it's brought up as if it's important.

>The 285th Rule of Acquisition//

So Twilight's a Ferengi now?

Okay the comedy aspect of the story is fine. It's funny enough. But it doesn't end on a joke. Really, you have to go a fair amount back from the ending to find a joke. So that sure creates the sense you're trying to have the story make a point. And that's fine as well—you do. But now the problem is getting to that point. In sending a message, a story will usually resolve a conflict and/or show character growth. And we're still good. Twilight solves a problem and learns something from it. But herein lies the issue: it was rather uneventful. She doesn't struggle to understand what Luna's trying to tell her. It doesn't cause her any difficulty to exorcise these non-spirits. There's not a single obstacle in her way. It's a very linear progression from see problem, to know how to deal with problem, to solve problem, with no setbacks. That makes the problem sound quite easy to solve, which weakens the plot arc and doesn't build any tension. When I'm not given any reason to doubt it might work, then I pretty much know how the story's going to go, and I'm just waiting for the explanation. It doesn't create any suspense or momentum. Well, there is a little. The point at which they figure out a lot of the special effects are fake does put a break in the steady rising action, but for one thing, it occurs rather early in the story, and for another, it then disarms a lot of the sense of danger.

This was a pretty good story, though. It's well on the way, but I think it could use a little more attention. To recap, the bigger issues I see are:

1. Decide what you want the story to be, and give it a more impactful ending in service to that. Do you want it to be primarily a comedy? Go out on a big joke. Do you want there to be an actual message? Then don't give Twilight such an easy path to victory, and have the ending draw a conclusion for her.

2. Twilight and Starlight need some distinction between their narrative voices. They sound the same. Maybe they have the same snarky attitude, but they should have different mannerisms and outlooks and speech tics and all that.

3. Having scene breaks would serve you far better than those strange time skips.

4. A couple of pretty common stylistic issues, but watch for having repetitive sentence structures and telling the reader outright how characters feel.

And as a final side note, it's really hard for people to find your story if you keep it on GDocs. You'd get a lot more viewers by posting it on FiMFiction.net, but it's up to you where you want it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3491

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>There was no surprise on her face; a little confusion, perhaps, but that was it.//

How can she see her own face to tell this?

>pedantic as it turned out//

I have no idea what you mean by "pedantic" here. It wouldn't seem to fit.

>A pained expression instantly highlighted her face.//

You're doing it again. You've kept to Twilight's perspective well so far, at least in terms of what she can know or perceive, but you have to consider how she'd perceive things. She can't see her own face to evaluate her expression. She might presume it by piecing together bits of it. She'd notice if she was clenching her teeth, for instance, because she can feel that. If she has a pained expression, there's a reason why as well, and that's going to be on her mind much more than deciding what her expression looks like. Whether the pain is physical or mental, she's going to be focused on the source. So be sure to stay mindful of the narration being reasonable in terms of what she could know or perceive, how she would perceive it, and where her attention would be.

>cutting into her hemispheres//

This is just a really weird image and phrasing. It comes across as more comical.

>It tilted back//

The door tilted back? That's a weird motion for it. Is the hinge mounted horizontally?

>Not a single audible noise could be discerned.//

As opposed to... her discerning inaudible noises?

>Twilight naturally took several steps back//

"Naturally" feels odd here, like you're trying to justify it to the reader. It doesn't feel very "in the moment."

>A half-hearted, weak, contemptuous smile twisted onto her lips.//

This is getting pretty subtle, but look at how you're trying to convey her emotion through her lips. If someone else held the perspective and was trying to interpret Twilight's mood from this, it'd work fine. But for her to associate it implies something entirely different. There's a cause and effect relationship. If she's very deliberately making her mouth do that, then again it could work, but I wouldn't understand her motive in doing so. Whose benefit would it be for? Nobody else is there. It seems more like the cause is the emotion and the effect is what you're describing here, but then the emotion shouldn't come from the action. Think about how you'd perceive that emotion in yourself. Not from how you held your mouth. Come at it more from the angle of why she feels this way, and then let the smile be a side effect of that.

>as though a strain of anxiety//

>as though expecting an attacker//
Watch repeating that phrasing in consecutive sentences.

>Her expression, in its vibrant, often glowing countenance, assumed a readily calculated and studied apprehension.//

Again, this isn't how she would perceive the emotion, and you really shouldn't be outright naming the emotion anyway. Imply the emotion through what she does and narrates, not by telling me what it is.

>Sugar Cube Corner//

Canon has spelled "Sugarcube" as one word for that.

>like an outlet rushing with decision//

That's a really strange simile. What kind of outlet are you talking about? The only one that comes to mind is electrical.

>This observation left her positively burdened with even greater apprehension.//

Don't be so vague. When I don't know what she's apprehensive about, it's hard to connect with her. What kind of fears does this inspire in her? Run through a couple. An example or two will carry a lot more meaning than a generalization.

>just then testified acutely to something out of a surreal novel//

That's a pretty awkward phrasing. And I'm not sure how that would be surreal. Dark, foggy, and shadowy is definitely creepy, but it doesn't strike me as surreal.

>most importantly there was nothing disorientating to be seen//

This is also awkwardly phrased. I'd recommend cutting it and joining it with the following sentence. It'd be a moot point, but for future reference, it's "disorienting."

>That is, a rather routine observation, but not so much anymore, apparently.//

That's also pretty awkward. It's also stating things that should already be obvious to the reader.

>as though she had more to add but dared not to//

Remember, she's effectively the narrator. Why would she be speculating on this? She should already know.

>Again, there was absolutely nothing significant to be described here.//

That sounds much more like it's coming from the author than from Twilight.

>to herself//

I don't know why authors love to use this phrase so much. Who else would she be thinking it to?

>in a similar patter just as before//

I'm not sure you really meant to use "patter" there, but this is a strange phrasing either way.

>And now a screwdriver was drilling a wide pin into the frontal part of her head.//

I don't know what a "wide pin" is in this context or why a screwdriver would be used on it.

>nudged against the corner, so that if you wanted to sit down over it you could only use the half which was in the open space//

That's a pretty obtrusive description of it, and "nudged" is a weird word choice for this.

>annoyed by this inconvenience//

Don't over-explain emotions. This is already apparent from what she says and how she says it.

>For whatever reason//

But she's the one who did it. She should know why.

>the colour drained from her already pale face.//

How does she know this? She can't see her own face. She might deduce this happening from other evidence, like her face going cold or something. You have to think about what she could actually perceive.

>castle of the two sisters//

This is a place name, so it would be a proper noun. You use this name again later.

>Applejack?//

Why doesn't she call out to them? She's been looking for someone, and now that she's finally not alone, she's content to just watch?

>Darkness abound.//

Why are you in present tense?

>in the most coarse intrusions of the self-deprecating soul.//

This is getting really purple. I can't even decipher what it means.

>it resembled a forlorn disposition//

The first scene was in pretty good shape, but the further I get into the story, this is getting worse. It's like you consulted a thesaurus and deliberately chose the most formal-sounding words you could find. That'd be bad enough on its own, but consider that this narration is supposed to be Twilight's thoughts. She's watching some very strange things happening. She's not going to have to presence of mind to dredge up lots and lots of fancy words. A narrator who speaks like this is a narrator who has the inclination and attention to do so, and Twilight really doesn't right now.

>posture pedantic//

I don't even know what this would look like. I've never seen "pedantic" used to describe a position. It can mean rigid, but not in a physical sense, and the connotation of why it would be rigid doesn't fit the situation.

>extreme trepidation highlighting her face, which was panting//

Again, she can't see her own face to make this judgment, but that shouldn't be what clues her in to how she feels anyway. And this says her face was panting, not that she was.

>stolidly silent//

Another weird phrasing. This implies she's forcing herself to stay silent despite temptations to do otherwise, but I have no idea what those might be.

>Many ideas were developing in her mind//

You're being very vague again. I have no idea what's on her mind here, so I'm not connected to her as a character.

>Oh, you gotta be kidding me//

Compare this to her narration. They're both her, but the narration is far more formal than her speech. Ideally, they'd sound the same. People don't think that much different than they speak.

>— she suddenly paused, turned around, staring blankly at the rest of the party planning cave in its gloominess —//

Don't leave space on either side of an em dash.

>ambivalence//

What's she ambivalent about?

>Sugar Cube//

The canon name has that as one word.

>Things like that only disappear when they hit their expiration date.//

Huh? How does that apply to a table?

>This scrambling of the mind was, of course, a consequence of the returning head pains.//

This sounds like an external evaluation of her, not something she's making herself.

>besides a mannequin//

beside

>Saying all this, she had gone up to the second floor//

How? Last thing you said about her condition, her head was hurting, and she'd had to brace herself to keep from falling, and suddenly she's upstairs?

>nothing of particular significance//

Exactly the phrase you used earlier.

>amend//

And I'm pretty sure that's not the right word choice.

>peripherals//

I don't know what you mean by this. Her peripheral vision? Then say so.

>She got up; the smile had vanished from her lips; so did the resolution from her countenance.//

It's a bad idea to have multiple semicolons in a sentence.

>— she waved her arm around —//

No space around the dashes. This is an ongoing problem.

>her eyes vaguely lit up//

This isn't a speaking action, so it needs to be a new sentence.

>So she leaned back against the tree, instinctively stretched out; heavy eyelids drooping...//

That's not really a correct use of a semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period, but what comes after it wouldn't be a complete sentence.

>A bump in the tracks gave everypony a start.//

What? Are these train tracks? I'm looking ahead, and it takes a while to get an explanation.

>notes of disappointment//

You're directly calling out emotion again.

>From a quick glance one would think their expressions were half-hearted, barely conveying any feeling; but this was merely a consequence of the drowning out of noise, of the dark, of the risk they were taking.//

This is backing off to a rather external perspective.

>Not right after the long silence, but some time later, when they had resumed the fragmented conversation.//

But this is the first thing we've seen. There was no indication the conversation had restarted, and you're retconning it after the fact.

>but with vexation, as though unconvinced of this hypothesis//

But she's your perspective character. "As though" shouldn't enter into it. She knows what her attitude is.

>I need to set my prioritizes straight.//

Typo.

>steam frequency//

What does that even mean?

>There was the lodging//

Why wouldn't you just call it a house?

>hardly even phased Twilight//

fazed

>hooves over her head like she were a peasant pleading before a king.//

That's not a spot for subjunctive mood, and once again, this is a very external judgment of her. If she's suddenly in pain, she's not going to be looking for imagery of her posture. It doesn't make sense for the perspective.

>but felt like his tongue were impossibly heavy//

Why are you jumping into Spike's perspective here?

>I understand, princess//

A title would be capitalized when used as direct address.

>She couldn't believe what she had allowed her student to do. But it was the only way.//

And now you're jumping to Celestia's head.

>a primordial key//

What would "primordial" have to do with this?

>This was obviously a great annoyance//

This sounds like Twilight is talking to the reader, not herself.

>like her brain had discarded all its excess dopamine//

This is very clinical and doesn't fit the tone of all the other description you've been giving. It at least suits her personality to think in these terms, except that you haven't been striking this tone throughout the story before.

>your Venerable Majesty//

The "your" would also be capitalized.

>Come on, come one//

Typo.

>I mean alicorn magic, sister//

"Sister" would be capitalized when used as a term of address.

>Or, not even matter//

There's no reason to have that comma.

>canterlot//

Capitalization.

>Where did it begin, princess?//

Capitalize the title used for address.

>malicious//

I can't fathom why Luna'd be malicious about this.

>or it just doesn't exist now?//

Missing word.

>poking into her hemispheres//

That's still a really strange way to refer to a brain.

>I understand, princess//

Capitalization.

>Using her magic//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>apparently looking for a particular one//

You've left Twilight's perspective here.

>Spike was considerably taken aback//

He was also taken aback two paragraphs ago.

>her trembling lips twisted into a thin, weary smile.//

This is lower case as if it's a speech tag, but it has no speaking action.

There's definitely a Lovecraftian sense about all this. The pervasive atmosphere, the creepiness, the sense of overwhelmingly impending doom. Lovecraft even often had these types of open endings, where he lays out that this horror exists and leaves it to the reader to imagine what consequences that has.

However, Lovecraft still wouldn't leave it needlessly vague. It's a little hard to get that invested in the ending, because I don't get a good feel for how her friends are doing without her, why she was the only one who could accomplish this, whether the existence she's had during this story is what she'll indefinitely continue to have, whether she's actually in any danger. For that matter, these aliens are never painted as being malicious. They're ominous, sure, but we don't know their intent or that they were even doing any of this deliberately. It may be their mere existence has this effect on reality, and they weren't trying to hurt anyone. Of course, with any Lovecraftian creation, that won't be the case, but I don't see the evidence of it.

So that all speaks to why the ending feels underwhelming to me, even though it had an effective build-up. There were some consistent mechanical issues that wouldn't be too hard to fix, but the biggest issue, really, is how much of the phrasing sounds unnatural. I commented on that in a few spots, and it was worst in the middle of the story. The first scene wasn't bad at all in that regard, and the end was only moderately so, but all the stuff in between felt pretty forced a lot of the time.

Again, I suspect you're going for a Lovecraftian feel by having a very formal and somewhat archaic sound to the narration. You don't keep it up, though. Twilight's voicing wavers quite a bit, and especially her dialogue doesn't sound much like the narration, which creates a disconnect. Lovcraft maintained that throughout, and it fit the personalities of his characters. And even though he used many unusual words, he didn't really use them in strange ways. Here, I can't tell whether you're stretching for some pretty odd metaphorical usage or just aren't familiar enough with the words to use them optimally, but the end effect is just that it sounds unnatural and stilted, whereas Lovecraft would only sound overly formal, yet correct.

So that'd be the biggest thing that needs fixing: the strange word choices and odd phrasings, and not strange and odd in a way that supports the story's atmosphere.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3492

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

In just the first two paragraphs, you blast through 6 different perspectives. It's fine to start with an omniscient narrative voice if you want to show what everyone's up to, but your narrative voice actually takes on those characters' identities. In the next scene, you do stick to Pinkie well, but you don't actually have much choice—she's the only character there. Once the party starts and there are other characters around, you start hopping heads again. If you're going to let the narrator voice characters' thoughts for them, it's best to stick to one perspective per scene, until you gain the experience to know when it's worth shifting the viewpoint and how to do it smoothly.

You also need to watch for repetition. For example, these phrases occur over the space of just 7 paragraphs:
>Twilight made her way//
>making her way to Twilight's side//
>as they made their way to the water-filled trough//
>Rainbow Dash and Applejack made their way back to the main table//
>As the ponies made their way to the punch bowl//
>Gummy made his own way over to the apple bobbing trough//

The entire first chapter just recounts things a reader should already know from "Party of One." You could have easily cut this chapter altogether and just made a reference to it to set up your story's context. You don't want to spend a whole chapter telling readers something they already know. Same with chapter 2. There's a teeny bit of Pinkie's thought process put in there, but for the most part, I'm just reading a transcript of an episode.

You sometimes use hyphens where you need dashes.

>a mixture of confusion and forced cheeriness in her voice//

Two problems with this. First, it directly names how she feels. Most times, you want to demonstrate character emotion, not tell what it is. It's like the difference between saying someone is happy and that they're smiling. The latter creates more of an image, and it's closer to how we read people in real life, so it comes across as more authentic. And second, Pinkie wouldn't figure out these emotions of hers by the sound of her voice. She'd already feel them internally. You don't have to look in a mirror or listen to your voice to know how you feel, after all. Keep in mind how she'd actually perceive her emotion.

Chapter 3, and we're still covering episode happenings while barely adding anything to them. You're filling in Pinkie's thoughts on the matter, but they're exactly what I'd expect. Until you deviate from the obvious, pick up where the episode left off, or diverge from it into an AU, there's no point in rehashing all this. Start where something's different from the episode.

>accidental running into a wall//

Typo.

>the yellow pegasi//

Fluttershy is only one pegasus, but even so, why would Pinkie refer to her friend in such an impersonal way?

>W-What's//

Unless it's a word that always has to be capitalized, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

Pinkie's already run off by the time Apple Bloom asks about her at the end of chapter 3, so it's breaking perspective for Pinkie's narration to be able to tell me it happened. And then you pop back to Pinkie's head for a couple sentences, then to Gummy's.

>curl up besides his favourite pink pony//

beside

>wait for it//

That's not Pinkie musing in her narration. That's the author talking to the reader. If you don't establish the kind of narrator that will do that right from the beginning, don't throw it in now. It's also a strange piece of comic relief in a story that's been entirely serious for a long stretch now.

>It is worth mentioning that in a world filled with talking pastel ponies, this was not normal.//

Yeah this doesn't work with the perspective.

>life!Was//

Missing space.

>grit//

You keep using that as a past tense. It should be "gritted." But you're also using it often enough that it's a bit repetitive.

>Thinking about the journey ahead of her, her stomach let out an audible growl.//

This says her stomach was thinking about the journey.

>her hut isn't that deep within the forest's boundaries//

Why'd you switch to present tense?

>Maud was the only one of them to not have a nickname, being the elder sister, and just way too Maud to change.//

But she has as much of a nickname as Pinkie does. Pinkie is just short for Pinkamena, and Maud is short for Maudelina. They've said in the show their full names are Pinkamena Diane Pie and Maudelina Daisy Pie.

>Had she noticed or cared//

But if she didn't notice, the narration can't say it was there. That's the way limited narration works.

>Leaving the farm, you'll find yourself on a dirt track leading in opposite directions. Turning right will take you towards Rockville train station//

Why is the narration addressing me now?

>Reaching out to pet him, the young timberwolf flinched at first//

This says the timberwolf pet itself. This is just one of the kinds of problems that commonly turn up with participial phrases, and you're definitely using tons of those.

>The pastel pink pony//

>the earth pony//
Why would she refer to herself like this?

>Tim(ber)?Stickdog?//

Missing space.

All of those are examples. It's far from an exhaustive list, as I didn't have time to document everything. But really, the biggest issue is that I don't understand why any of this happened and what it means.

So let's start with the background. Everyone's being terrible to her, and nobody's acting like they should. That doesn't mean you have to conform to canon characterization perfectly, but it does mean that when you deviate from it, you need to justify that. So sure, it's possible that Twilight's just plain mean. But she doesn't start that way in the show, so you have to connect the dots to show me how we get here from there.

Take the ending as well. Pinkie finds this place to live and a companion, but no point is ever made of any of it. The story doesn't come to any kind of a conclusion. It just stops. Now, I know it's a lead-in to your comic, and it probably does answer all these questions, but for us to post a story, it needs to be fairly self-contained. It doesn't have to give all the answers. We've posted plenty of stories that were only one part of a series, and the entire narrative took several stories to tell. But while each story may leave the overall plot arc suspended at the end, they still have their own subplots they wrap up, such that each feels like a complete story. Yours doesn't It just feels like the setup for a story, which is pretty much what you want it to be. But it's not the kind of thing we're looking to post.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3497

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>an exasperated hoof to her face//

Well, to be fair, it's not the hoof that's exasperated. But more to the point, it's better if you imply emotion than state it outright, and from what she does and what she says, you could cut that "exasperated," and it would still be clear.

>come on!//

If you have a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>a clear sign of intense effort//

This would seem to be from Starlight's perspective. Trixie would note intense effort from how much she was concentrating or straining herself or something. Evaluating the outward evidence is more in Starlight's court. Yet in the next sentence, you go on to say what Trixie could feel her vein doing, and that's not something Starlight could know, so I can't tell what perspective you want this to be. It's definitely not omniscient, but you don't have a steady viewpoint.

>for someone that//

For sentient creatures, it's preferred to use "who" instead of "that."

>especially for someone that wasn’t under the tutelage of an alicorn//

This is maybe a little off point? Starlight could teleport before she met Twilight.

>Magic began building up at the tip of Trixie’s horn, sending crackles of magic//

>like that, you know. If you force things like that//
Watch close repetition of words like this.

>build up//

When you use this as a noun, hyphenate it or make it one word.

>to not//

Swap the order of those.

>a—THUD—before//

That format means there's some kind of interruption at that point in the narration, but you've already had the interruption occur. It's also more inexperienced writers who try to emphasize sounds like this. You don't need the all caps or the dashes. It's a valid word as is.

>The worry on Starlight’s face subsided as soon as she saw Trixie’s open but bewildered eyes, spinning around in their sockets as she blinked to regain focus.//

The perspective is unidentifiable here. Starlight can't see her own face to call the expression worried, but if Trixie's eyes are spinning, she wouldn't be able to see it either. So who holds the viewpoint here?

>Trixie mumbled, obviously woozy but disappointment still hanging in her voice.//

Obvious to whom? Must be Starlight, but in the next paragraph, we get this:
>asked Starlight, obviously relieved that her friend wasn’t hurt//
You're jumping perspectives back and forth constantly. Plus this is once again a repetitive phrasing. And you don't want to over-explain why characters do things.

>exasperated Trixie//

That's really strange to use as a speaking verb, but it's also mis-aimed. The direct object of that verb would be the person getting exasperated by the speech, not the speech itself.

>she laid down next to her//

Lay down. They're tricky verbs to keep straight.

>She’s been in way tougher situations than this before//

Why is this in present tense?

>‘em//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, since they assume you want a single opening quotation mark. You can paste one in the right way, or you can type two in a row and delete the first. Like a lot of the things I'm marking so far, this is just one example. You should scan the whole story for other instances.

>WOA//

What was she going to say? Assuming it's "whoa," you're spelling it wrong.

>Silence filled the empty room.//

Whatever perspective you were using, neither one of them is still there to witness this.

>OOAH//

Yeah, you spelled it wrong.

>Starlight furrowed her brow in anger.//

You don't need the "in anger" at all. It's already clear how she feels.

>burying the lead//

lede

>Gosh, why does she never think of the consequences?!//

>Trixie does what her first impulses instruct her to do//
>like she always inevitably does//
You're in present tense again.

>amount of times//

"Amount" is for collective quantities, like money. You need "number."

>“Ohh,” Trixie shoved her hoof in her face, “I am such a screw up.”//

You're trying to use that as a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb. You can add a speaking action, have the narrative action be a separate sentence, or format it like a narrative aside:
“Ohh”—Trixie shoved her hoof in her face—“I am such a screw up.”
if she doesn't stop speaking for the action to occur or:
“Ohh—” Trixie shoved her hoof in her face “—I am such a screw up.”
if she does.

>“Wait a minute…” she paused.//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>five minutes to three, right before the evening bell rang.//

Huh? The evening bell rings at 3? That's not evening.

>to herself//

I think this is pretty obvious.

>to not//

Again, reverse these.

>past, but she knew that if she wanted to grow past//

More close word repetition.

>“OOH!” she jumped//

Non-speaking action.

>Using her magic to scoop all of the pieces into a neat little pile next to the table, Trixie quickly picked up a nearby decorative flower pot and placed it in front of her crime.//

Participles mean that things happen at the same time. Make sure that's what you intend when you use one. This says she scooped up the pieces while picking up the flowerpot. But it seems more like you meant for those to occur one after the other.

>Making great haste to ensure that nobody would notice her deviousness//

You're over-explaining what's obvious from her behavior.

>It takes a lot to shake Trixie//

Present tense again.

>slid inside the room//

>slid the cabinet door closed//
Pretty close together to reuse that word already.

>to…” her voice snagged on the word, “apologize//

Formatting is off again.

>assumingly//

That's just an awkward and made-up-sounding word. Try "presumably."

>the confused mare//

Through most of this chapter, you've done a better job of sticking to Trixie's perspective, but this is a slip. You're having Trixie choose to refer to herself this way, which is unnatural.

>Woah

whoa

>Trixie found herself incredibly exited//

Typo.

>girls night out//

girls'

I'm going to have to agree with the commenter who said Starlight's office is covered with personal effects. Maybe her statement about her office being devoid of personality was a joke, but there's no indication of that in the story, so I have to take her at her word.

>drenching the sky will all sorts of oranges, pinks, and purples//

Typo.

>Going with reservations at Shetland’s was definitely the way to go.//

Close repetition of "go."

>Finally landing on the sweep of hair towards the front of her scalp, Trixie’s demeanor brightened.//

This says her demeanor landed on the sweep of her hair..

>Licking the bottom of her hoof, Trixie raised her foreleg and moved a bit of hair a few millimeters to the right.//

Another participle creating a synchronization problem.

>such attire//

>her usual attire//
Close repetition again.

>girls night out//

girls'

>having friends really is a unique and amazing feeling//

Present tense again.

>around at the mishmash of ponies trotting around//

Close repetition.

>as this was around when most ponies went out to dinner//

And this isn't long after those two.

>slammed right back into Trixie’s conscious//

I'm not sure whether you meant conscience or consciousness, but what you have doesn't make sense.

>jokingly flirt with each other all the time//

>Whichever works.//
Present tense.

>She took a step outside of the doorway and closed them behind her.//

What does "them" refer to?

>hang up//

As a noun, either hyphenate this or make it one word.

>I had to do the usual, guidance counselor-type stuff//

No reason to have that comma.

>amazed somepony could ever think that way about themselves//

Don't over-explain her attitude.

>“Wow,” Starlight blinked away what seemed to be tears rimming her eyes.//

Non-speaking dialogue tag.

>It’s warm, inviting smell//

Its/it's confusion.

>with a glance back at Trixie and an accompanying nod of approval, the two made their way inside the doorway.//

This says both of them glanced back at Trixie. In other words, you have Trixie glancing back at herself.

I'm seeing lots of the same problems through these chapters, but I hope I've given you enough examples to scout through the rest of the chapters for them. I'm not going to keep up this level of detail or keep pointing out repeat issues from here on, so that I can finish more quickly.

>“Wow,” admired Starlight//

That's really questionable as a speaking verb.

>small, lit//

You don't need that comma.

>Both Trixie and Starlight took seats opposite of one another.//

That's kind of obvious, right? Is it possible for only one of them to take a seat opposite the other?

>Trixie was finding more and more about Starlight every day that continuously astonished her//

See, this is one of the big problems with this story. This exact sentiment is nice. But you never give me any evidence of it. They're acting nice and lovey-dovey, but what actually clicks for them? What specific times did they share that meant a lot to them? What little quirks do they have that endear them to each other? Just stating this as a generalization doesn't carry much power. Give me a few short examples. That's what will bring it to life.

>even later, their food//

They never ordered...

>the attractive features//

What features? What does she like about them? This is way too vague. You're making the reader do all the work for you.

>Trixie, stopped herself from shouting.//

What's that comma doing there?

Okay, their heart-to-heart about how Starlight's never been disappointed in Trixie is nice and a bit of a different angle, and one really tied to their unique histories, but it still needs to be more specific. Starlight keeps talking about "all the times" she was proud of Trixie, but we don't get to hear the story behind a single one of them. Spend a paragraph each showing me a couple of specific events Starlight recalls where Trixie made her proud. That will form a far stronger connection with the reader than a vague description.

Through all this dinner, we never saw them, y'know... eating dinner.

>She still couldn’t quite put a pin in what her new feelings towards Starlight were. Admiration? That was certainly there now more than ever.//

>Maybe it was respect?//
She's already said her friend was hot, You're kind of past the point of her figuring out her feelings.

>a nearby store she said she wanted the two to visit, or an idea for a book she wanted to read//

This is really close to the kind of thing you need. Instead of being vague, you've told me they're talking about a shop and a book. But give me more. What kind of shop? What does she like there? What book? What interests her about it?

>If Trixie had read more books, she might’ve called this situation a “catch-22.”//

This doesn't make sense. You're giving her knowledge about a book you say she hasn't read.

>trusty, little wagon//

Don't need that comma.

>angry that he was making a bad day worse//

You're over-explaining again.

>doing so could put at risk the friendship between you and the only pony in all of Equestria who’s ever gotten close to you//

This isn't a terribly original situation. Do something to make it different from every other story out there. It's fine to have this, but give it something more.

>pepper her with kisses//

That's quite a leap from where she was before. What does she actually love about Starlight?

>whomever it was//

This is actually a spot for "whoever."

>cheer leader//

cheerleader

>… I//

>… Trixie//
Don't put a space after a leading ellipsis.

>hairbrained//

Harebrained

>pay you adieu//

I've only ever heard that as "bid" you adieu.

>her nerves had not one relaxed//

Typo.

The first four paragraphs of this chapter keep saying the same things.

>both out of excitement and out of worry//

Directly naming emotions again.

>“Hmm,” Starlight shrugged.//

Non-speaking action.

>with sarcasm//

You don't need to explain the joke.

>Taking a moment to scan Trixie’s face and see what the magician was planning, Starlight closed her eyes and nodded her head accordingly.//

Another spot where you've synchronized things that shouldn't be.

>Starlight opened her eyes.//

In this paragraph, you've jumped over to Starlight's perspective.

>one-hundred percent//

You're using the whole phrase as a single modifier, so hyphenate all that.

>not to mentioned//

Typo.

>Starlight sat quietly, sipping her juice box, as a voice began to echo out over the loud speakers.//

You've ended two sentences in a row with an "as" clause. It's structurally repetitive.

>loud speakers//

loudspeakers

>first hand//

firsthand

>odd-job//

That's not a hyphenated term.

>we’ve know each other//

Typo.

>Emotion caught in her thought.//

That's a strange phrasing. Are you sure you didn't mean "throat"? Even then, it's pretty vague.

>tear filled//

Hyphenate.

>I’d say you’ve got a whole lot going for you than just that.//

Seems like you're missing a "more" somewhere.

>“Hmm,” comforted Starlight//

Another really questionable speaking verb.

>this,” she gestured to the stage, “didn’t//

Aside formatting.

>nerves and excitement therein spread all throughout her body, heightening every nerve//

Close word repetition.

>stages emergency celebratory fireworks show//

Missing apostrophe.

>“Hmm,” smirked Starlight.//

How do you smirk a sentence? It doesn't involve making a sound.

>And she was going to enjoy every, single second of it.//

No reason to have that comma.

There are a couple typos in the author's note.

This was a cute story, but it suffers from being nearly identical to the vast majority of other shipping stories out there. First, what went right? You did establish the basis for why Trixie would love Starlight. It's not an unusual basis (one often applied to Twilight in older stories), but it's there. I'll go ahead and take this opportunity to plug the series of blog posts Aragon wrote on how to do good shipping. They're worth reading. What they're really about is proving to me that two characters work together, that they genuinely love each other, that they're good relationship material for each other. Each has things to give and take, and they find a good balance.

And that leads to what went wrong. I don't know what Starlight sees in Trixie. The narrator is constantly there telling me she does. It's not like you skipped the subject altogether. But I just have the narrator's word. Demonstrate it. Put it on full display.

Aside from that, you had a few common stylistic issues, like too many blunt statements of character emotion and a perspective that kept jumping back and forth between them. There were some other assorted editing errors, and I was by no means comprehensive. I did mark examples of all the types of problems I saw, but not every instance of each, so please use these as guidelines to make a good editing pass through the whole thing.

None of these problems are insurmountable. Most of them aren't even that hard to deal with. Put some more work into this, and I could definitely see posting it.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3499

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Chapter i.i:
>She was like a kitten readying itself to pounce on a toy mouse; primal instincts urging her to intimidate her prey, while woefully unaware of how sweet and friendly she really looked.//
That's not a correct use of a semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period, but the part after it would be left as a sentence fragment in this case.

>in mock agony//

>her friend mocked//
Pretty close together to use that word again already.

>“Alright,” Starlight reached out with her mind//

You're trying to use a non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>cleverly dampening Twilight’s magic hoofprint//

If you mean something akin to "suppressing," the preferred term is "damping."

>Next taste of magic, Twi, Starlight kept her horn humming with power, Teleport literally anywhere else, and I'll still be able to sense your alicorn foot—.//

I don't know whether you meant that narrative bit to be a speech tag (it has no speaking verb) or a narrative aside (it isn't formatted correctly), but in either case, "teleport" shouldn't be capitalized, and a dash counts as end punctuation. Don't ever put a period or comma after one.

>They were somewhere high in the very sky, upon a certain pirate zep, no less.//

Now you're losing me. "Zep" is an incredibly informal term I'd expect an expert to use as jargon, not someone like Starlight. "Very" sky is also a weirdly extravagant phrasing, and what does "certain" mean here? It sure creates the sense that I'm supposed to know which one you're talking about.

>blather “Hi, guys—!”//

Needs a comma, since it's presented as dialogue.

>“You,” she shakily rose a hoof to Starlight’s chest, which swelled with pride, “you//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag, plus "rose" is intransitive. You want "raised."

>He grabbed the handle of a silver platter cover, “Feast your eyes, on, this!”//

You're doing that non-speaking action thing again, and don't use commas for dramatic pauses like that. Also, when you have a word italicized for emphasis, include any exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics. This comes up repeatedly through the whole story, so please scan for them.

>sake! "//

Extraneous space.

>day?” he lifted that claw, much lighter than the prior one.//

>“Ooh,” Twilight chewed, “Starlight,” she struck the table, “tell//
>“I’m,” Twilight shuddered as she stared down at her plate, her muzzle swaying, “I//
More non-speaking actions. And on that second one, you shouldn't put more than one speech tag on a single quote anyway.

>Slowly, her face lifted, wincing with every inch. Twilight’s face//

Kind of repetitive to mention her face twice so close together.

Chapter i.ii:
>His shoulders drooped, ear frills wilting, “That’s ridiculous.”//
Non-speaking action.

>O-or, there’s something that won’t let me//

There's rarely a reason to put a comma after a conjunction. It doesn't belong here.

>this, is, the answer//

Trying to use commas for dramatic pauses again.

>Spike laughed a shallow sob.//

He's crying? Why?

>whole, horrible//

You don't need the comma. These are hierarchical adjectives—they'd sound really odd in reverse order.

>Starlight sat beside him, pulling him in for a hug, “Celestia//

Non-speaking action.

>back whatever he was about to say, pressing the back//

Close word repetition.

>“It’s somewhere here,” she circled the area, “south of Klugetown.//

Non-speaking action.

>This was an emergency; life and death, for Harmony’s sake!//

Misused semicolon.

>face.“It won’t be, Spike—” she choked on his name//

Missing space, non-speaking action, and you just used "choked" in the last paragraph.

>He looked to scared//

Typo.

Chapter i.iii:
>Guilt panged her in the belly.//
That's a really strange phrasing.

>Woah//

Why doesn't anyone ever spell this right?

>‘Shining//

That should be double quotes.

>“Um,” Sunburst fixed his glasses, “y-yes//

Non-speaking action as speech tag.

>The words had barely left his lips when she turned and began galloping down the hall. She made the next right, down a stairwell ringing with clamor on the other side of them.//

I'm not sure what "them" refers to.

>Propping herself on its golden rim, she beheld her home decked in banners, streamers and balloons, all of which were pink and lavender.//

She pretty much already said that.

Chapter i.iv:
>And yet, Starlight couldn’t shake the feeling that she was being watched through the trees.//
There's rarely a reason to put a comma after a conjunction. There shouldn't be one here.

>totally-real//

When you have a two-word phrase starting with an -ly adverb, don't use a hyphen.

>crossing the Sea//

Why is this capitalized?

>You’d//

It's not a good idea to start addressing the reader when you haven't established them as an audience and been doing this all along.

>In fact, it’d be downright hilarious.//

I don't get why she'd find it funny that her one chance to save Twilight was no longer available.

It's worth noting that "just" is a word many authors tend to overuse without realizing it. I've seen it numerous times in the chapter already. It has 39 total, which isn't that bad, but you do hit clusters of them in spots.

>three, headbutting tribes//

You don't need that comma. If reversing the order of the adjectives would sound really strange, then don't use a comma.

>thrumming with magic//

You keep using that phrase, or some variation on it.

>Starlight felt even more unease pile up inside of her//

There are a fair number of times you outright tell me how she feels, like this excerpt. It gives the reader the information but not the mood. This comes across as fairly cold. How do you feel when you're uneasy? Both physically and mentally. What kinds of thought go through your head? Communicate those kinds of things so the reader will deduce the emotion on his own.

>Turning back toward where she’d come from, Starlight leaped a foot back like a startled kitten.//

Repetitive use of "back."

>Wariness and curiosity//

You're directly identifying her mood again.

>whole, accursed//

You don't need that comma.

>thrumming like that of a heartbeat//

This is already the fourth time you use "thrum" i the chapter.

>warm and lovingly//

You're mixing adjective and adverb there.

>The Humans Sunset Shimmer lived among come to mind.//

The verb tense is wrong, and I don't know why you're capitalizing "Humans" when you don't capitalize any of the pony races.

>wEll,” the smiling witch rose her arms, turning as though presenting the eerie clearing, “HeRe//

Non-speaking action, and "rose" is intransitive. You need "raised."

>Clapping her ears, her belly slapped against the soaked grass.//

This says her belly clapped her ears.

>UnCoMfOrTaBle,” her knuckles hung limply at her sides once more, “aRe//

Non-speaking action.

>"Or did you somehow know already?” She already knew the answer, somehow.//

Very repetitive phrasing.

>Which means, they know why I'm here//

Don't need that comma.

>“EuGh,” Hydia briefly swatted the air in front of her face, “fLoWeRs//

Non-speaking action.

>twist the narrative like her boastful friend, twisting//

Close repetition of "twist."

>OnE iN tHe SaMe//

one and the same

>disease.No//

Missing space.

>“When she had absolutely no reason to.”//

She picks right up speaking in the next paragraph, so the convention is to leave the closing quotation marks off this one.

>tHe BuRdEn Of ThEsE BoAsTs ArEn’T//

You have a singular subject (burden) with a plural verb (aren't).

>W-Well//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>the mare//

Weird of Starlight to refer to herself in such an external way.

Chapter i.v:
>a tormented by both the elements and the witches’ parting words//
Extraneous word.

>basket.You//

Missing space.

>N-Not//

Again, only capitalize the first one.

>curled in an embrace with her tail silky, wavy tail//

Something got jumbled there.

>In a flash and a yank in her horn//

I don't know what "a yank in her horn" means.

>24/7//

It's preferred to spell out numbers that short.

>But, I tried telling you that Twilight isn’t here//

There are only a few specific circumstances where it's valid to have a comma after a conjunction. This isn't one of those.

>S-she//

Consider what sound she'd actually repeat here. That word doesn't have an "s" sound in it, but that's what you're having her say in the first part of the stutter.

>“That reminds me,” Fluttershy’s voice was low with amusement,//

>mean," Starlight glanced left, where Fluttershy stared ahead with furrowed brows, "on//
You're trying to use a non-speaking action as a dialogue tag.

>You should get nice and clean before you get sick yourself.//

A very muddy Starlight just hugged Fluttershy. Don't they both need a bath now?

>“Starlight, if you don’t mind my asking,” Fluttershy looked to her, concerned and curious, “where did you go?”//

Another non-speaking action used as a dialogue tag. I don't know why you're suddenly doing this a lot.

Chapter ii.i:
>Come in, come on//
You sure you didn't mean both of those to be "in"?

In this conversation, they're calling each other by name far more often than people normally do in a one-on-one talk.

>laugh at my face//

Unless there's something funny about her face, the phrasing is normally "laugh in my face."

>Your herd.//

Well... a group of horses is a herd, but a group of ponies is a string.

>*sob*//

This is an awkward way to format sound effects, but it's also kind of coming out of nowhere. Her dialogue didn't sound like she was getting ready to cry, and suddenly she is.

>Starlight Glimmer flung forth, her breast filling haltingly, an icy caress upon her sweat-matted coat//

This just plain doesn't flow well. It's got multiple awkward phrasings, and the way you've inserted a phrase in between "flung" and its direct object is a big speed bump.

>It’s nice of Starlight’s brain//

You've switched to present tense.

>herself.With//

Missing space.

>Why are in my room?//

Missing word.

>thought,” Starlight winced, a sharp flaring in her forehead, “nhg//

Non-speaking action.

>somepony’s prickly//

Present tense.

>“Eh,” she scratched her mane, “I’ll//

>“And besides,” Starlight’s ears perked, her voice was unusually tender, “...I’m//
Non-speaking actions.

>make an exception for you. I’d make//

Close word repetition.

>typically-boisterous//

No hyphen.

>Why take this hypothetical scenario a so seriously?//

Extraneous word.

>Starlight,” she approached, pushing her back into bed, “why//

Non-speaking action. I'm going to have to stop marking these if I ever want to finish the story. You need to do a good sweep for these.

>They’ve certainly done weirder things//

Present tense.

>flash-crisped in fire, her entire world flashing//

Close repetition.

>burned.The//

Missing space. And the narration in this paragraph is so dull for what's happening to her. The narration is supposed to be her thoughts. But compare how the narration sounds to her dialogue. They're completely different. She's yelling and screaming, yet her narration sounds like she's bored.

>pudge//

That's a really weird word choice. I can't see it referring to anything but her stomach, but why would that be burning?

>soot covered//

Hyphenate.

>was the too much//

Not sure what you meant to say there, but this isn't it.

>Tarnation//

That isn't a proper noun.

>Sugarcube//

That's just a generic term of endearment. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>yah had t’ find//

Don't over-write her accent. Readers know what she sounds like.

>might'//

mite

>Where’s it?//

Nobody would use a contraction here.

>‘er//

Backward apostrophe.

>T-they//

What sound would she actually repeat? There isn't a "t" sound in that word.

>Th-They//

Only capitalize the first one.

>dream...,//

Don't put a comma after an ellipsis. The ellipsis already counts as end punctuation.

Chapter ii.ii:
Why are you putting the letter in quotes?

>horn…Her//

Leave a space after the ellipsis.

>with..//

Needs another dot.

>It all felt dead.//

I'm barely a page into this chapter, and I've already seen 10 uses of some form of "feel." It's getting very repetitive.

>means...!//

That's the one punctuation combo that doesn't make sense to me. How do you trail off emphatically? They're opposite effects.

>click-clack's//

That's not a correct use for an apostrophe, and sound effects don't need to be italicized.

>two, strong//

No comma here.

>“I can’t—,”//

Don't use a comma with a dash. The only thing that a comma would replace is a period. Otherwise, don't use one.

>withcrippling//

Typo.

>“I mean,” Starlight breathed deep, “you’re a great friend//

>rate,” Starlight’s eyes rolled, “but//
Non-speaking action.

>you,she//

Missing space.

>Forgiving her crimes, then teaching her friendship; tolerating her failures, letting her laze about the castle a year after graduating....//

One too many dots at the end, and that semicolon isn't used right.

>“And,” Starlight waded through memories, “the//

>“So,” she sniffled, “even//
Non-speaking action.

>awful, hollowness//

Why would you put a comma there?

>well,” she snorted like a pig, “I//

Non-speaking action.

>I don’t know how long you’ve laid here//

lain

>But, let’s move forward//

No comma.

>“I,” Twilight’s voice wavered, “I…//

>“T-Twilight,” she gulped her hammering heart back down her throat, “you//
Non-speaking action.

>And so I refuse to believe, that Spike//

No comma.

>evenhappen//

Typo.

>Do you me to start crying over it?//

Missing word.

>W-Well?//

Only capitalize the first one.

>She lifted a foreleg and brought it down, “I’m//

Non-speaking action.

>however-many//

Don't need that hyphen.

> just…” the tension in her muscles slacked, “Just//

Non-speaking action, capitalization.

>“Well,” she turned over a hoof, “it’s//

Non-speaking action.

>as the blanket left her flanks and lower back, as the ground fell away.//

It's pretty clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence, much less stacked up together like this.

>F-Forgot//

Only capitalize the first one.

>one, boiled//

>solid, violet//
No comma.

>there!No//

Missing space.

There's an awful lot of sighing going on in this chapter.

>voice.“‘Oh,//

Missing space.

>to?.//

Extraneous period.

>‘em//

Backward apostrophe.

>Unless,” Twilight turned her head, “you//

Non-speaking action.

>groaning “Twilight!”//

Needs a comma.

>that’swhat’s//

Missing space.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3500

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>shined like silver//
"Shined is the past tense for the transitive version of the verb. You want "shone."

>dragons breath//

Missing an apostrophe.

Chapter 1:
>Goddesses blinding glory//
Missing apostrophe.

>recoiling back//

Redundant.

>recoiling back from the thunder like a blanket yanked away//

Let me revisit that. It doesn't make sense. Something recoiling is doing so of its own volition, yet you're likening it to something that's forced to move that way. One's doing that thing, and the other is having that thing done to it.

>pale, blue atmosphere//

No need to have that comma.

>U.S.A.//

The insignias on our spacecraft don't use the periods.

>sweet breeze that smelled of blossoming flowers and sweet//

Watch the close word repetition.

>damming judgment//

I assume you meant "damning."

>She shifted from leg to leg under her bulky suit//

It's usually awkward to have the first reference to a character be by pronoun, since pronouns work through antecedent. Even a generic mention would be fine, if you don't want to give her name yet.

>The blue-clad scientist//

It becomes clear in this paragraph that she's your perspective character. In that case, it doesn't make sense for her to say this. It's something very external to her, not something she'd call herself. Keep in mind a limited narration is essentially that character's thoughts. In your own head, would you call yourself something like "the jeans-wearing fanfiction author"? That's why this kind of phrasing usually doesn't work for a limited perspective.

>Twenty-percent oxygen.//

You don't need that hyphen.

>but it should cause more than a slight headache//

Seems like you meant "shouldn't."

>“It’s a gamble”//

Missing punctuation.

>I should run more test//

Typo.

>her face no longer hidden behind the gold-coated visor//

But Astra had already referred to Liz's eyes flicking around. How could she see that?

>as the equine-like creature slowly slinked from its hiding spot//

You've ended 2 sentences in a row with an "as" clause, which gets structurally repetitive.

>The scientist//

Again, why's she referring to herself in such an external manner? Maybe you're trying to use an omniscient narration? Much of it does sound omniscient, but near the beginning of the scene, you had this:
>The blue-clad scientist was no stranger to extra-terrestrial organics, but the sheer bounty and variety of it around her astounded and frightened her//
This isn't something Liz could know. An omniscient narrator could, or Astra could, but Astra wouldn't call herself "the blue-clad scientist." A little later, we have this:
>Immediately strange mutters and murmurs and gasps could be heard from the bushes and behind the trees.//
This wouldn't really be omniscient since nothing is strange to an omniscient narrator. That opinion creeping in there makes it sound like a limited narration, but there's already some ambiguity over which one holds the perspective. Yet later we get this:
>It was as good of a blessing as she would get.//
This is clearly Liz's impression of things. It's best to choose one character whose experience of these events you want to relay and stick with her. Don't let the perspective hop back and forth between them. Keep it to what one can know or perceive.

>her short blue hair the same color of her suit bobbing around her head//

This makes it sound like the suit is bobbing around her head.

>Don’t be shy little one.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>We don’t mean any harm?//

Why is that a question?

>“LaLuna!” several of them pointed ecstatically toward Astra, rushing to meet her.//

The lower case says you're using that piece of narration as a dialogue tag, but it has no speaking action.

>recoil uncomfortable//

uncomfortably

>space,” she hacked as one of the winged creatures clung to her arm, pulling her along as well//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag again.

>“Won’t you live a little?” she poked at the pouting academic.//

Same, plus another of these very external character references. If you want an omniscient narration, they're not exactly wrong, but they're still not a great idea, especially when you try to get really fancy with the phrasing like this. Keep it simple.

>exaggerant//

"Exaggerated" would be a much more normal phrasing.

>Such was the cause for celebration.//

This sentence just sticks out as something that doesn't need to be there.

>sweet smelling//

Hyphenate.

>feather friends//

feathered. And I guess you're referring to birds here? Though I can't imagine why birds would be jousting with pegasi.

>we just hit the freaking jackpot Astra.//

>This is big Liz//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>with glee.//

I haven't really said anything until now, but it's weak to name emotions outright like this. Demonstrate how they feel through their appearance and behavior. If you say someone smiled, I know he's happy without you ever having to use the word "happy." It's a more authentic and engaging way to get emotion across.

>It gave a startled gasp and a heavy blush.//

I'm not sure why a pony would blush at this. If anything, it might get mad.

>If was only several minutes into the trek//

Typo.

>excited by such unknown possibilities//

Similar to emotion, don't outright name motivations. This is also completely vague, to the point it means nothing.

>astronauts legs//

Missing apostrophe.

>Thunk//

Having sound effects in narration like this doesn't tend to fit the tone of a serious story. Just describe what it sounds like.

>Both of their hopes were dashed//

This is said so blandly that it doesn't convey their emotion. Show me how they react. And if you intend to have a limited narration, let the tone of the character thought carry the mood.

A little tangent on that. Look at this excerpt:
>It would be the achievement of a lifetime.//
This is Liz's thought stated as narration. That makes Liz the perspective character in a limited narration. I'm reading her thoughts and impressions of what happens around her. If she's angry, the narration should sound like something an angry person might say. It should reflect her mood. So when she sees the ruined city, have the narration state her impressions, consistent with how someone in her mood would. It's not just what the narration says, but how it says it.

>What had once been a city built for gods, was little more than a shell of cracked marble and overgrown and crumbling stonework.//

Don't need that comma.

>did their hearts stop trying to leap out of their chests//

Whichever one holds the perspective can only know this about herself, unless she cites what she sees the other doing that leads her to conclude it.

>now dulled//

Hyphenate.

>And on the statues, one was borne a crescent, and the other a sun.//

That's a really awkward phrasing.

>I thought they are referring to them//

The verb tenses don't match here.

>“Are you sure they are referring to us?”//

I think you meant to say "aren't" here, since otherwise this would contradict what Liz just said.

>“Are you anticipating these little guys to draw spears on us then,”//

Isn't that a question?

>they were set side by side as the head of the table//

I think you meant "at."

>Comethe,” he motioned them over as the smell of food wafted through the air.//

Non-speaking action.

>the newcomers every move//

Missing apostrophe.

Isn't Astra going to do something to test whether they can eat the food?

>“How old do you think it is,”//

That's a question.

>“Hard to tell really,” she shrugged//

Non-speaking action.

>once great//

Hyphenate.

>same,” the Commander breathed a sigh a relief.//

Non-speaking action.

>striping//

stripping

>strange, yet tantalizing dishes//

Don't need that comma.

>aging yet soft bedding//

Too soon to reuse that phrasing already.

>she could feel Astra lay beside her//

lie

Chapter 2:
>She could see it all across the horizon//
Same thing you did in the second scene of chapter 1. You're using a pronoun for Liz before introducing her, even generically.

>Like vibrations traveling up from the soles of her feet to the cap of her skull, resonating like an amplifier.//

Watch the close repetition of "like."

>The feeling of everything ripped from you in an instant.//

Be careful addressing the reader. There's a lot implied by doing so, a lot you probably don't want to take on.

>strange and powerful beings. A strange peace surrounding them.//

Close repetition of "strange," and I'm not sure you meant that sentence to be a fragment.

>the two goddesses horns//

Missing apostrophe.

>like a nightlight, then growing into a raging inferno. The power ripped through them, the very ground underneath Liz’s feet trembling like an earthquake.//

You're really using a ton of these "like" phrasings in this scene. Shift some of them over to metaphor, where you'd say they are the same thing, not "like." Those don't get repetitive as easily. Or you can switch some to a different word than "like."

>a solitary tear//

This is one of the most cliched things you could have written.

>among the ruin//

"Among" goes with a plural, not a collective. You could say "among the ruins," but if you mean it as an abstract conxep so it needs to be collective, something like "amid the ruin" would do better.

>the ruined gates//

This is the third use of some form of "ruin" within just a couple paragraphs.

>the blue goddesses lips//

Missing apostrophe.

>cold, stone floor//

You don't need that comma. A rule of thumb is that if two adjectives would sound strange in reverse order, then they don't need a comma.

>unmistakable sensation//

>unmistakable voice//
These are just a few sentences apart.

>through the corridors//

>through the maze of corridors//
Repetitive, just two sentences apart.

>light suddenly assaulting her vision//

>dazed by the sudden flash//
Close repetition again. I don't know why you're just now doing this so much. Maybe you were rushed in writing this chapter or didn't do as much editing?

>happene-”.//

I don't know how she'd be able to pronounce that final "e," this needs a proper dash instead of a hyphen, and you have an extraneous period.

>back and disappearing into the shadows.

>
>Astra was already pushing the two of them back//
Close repetition.

>high-intensity light of her camera//

>light of her camera//
And again.

>Leave me,” she gritted desperately through the pain.//

Non-speaking action.

>Liz would never get a chance to tell Astra leaving her was not an option.//

This sure makes it sound like Liz knows of future events. You're kind of trying to back out into an omniscient voice here, but it's not working.

>a jet-black creature with twin fangs like daggers get bombarded//

That "get" isn't the right verb form.

You really are using "corridor" and "light" an awful lot.

>like bugs//

>like towering tombstones//
>like a drum//
That's all in the same paragraph. This chapter is just chock full of repetition.

>One//

Why is that capitalized?

>Fire shot from her space pack and jets of white-hot exhaust that kicked like a cannon burned in the night sky.//

I haven't marked it until now, but you have this problem quite a bit as well. When you have a conjunction, look and see if there is both a subject and a verb on each side. Here, you do: Fire shot... and... jets... burned.... When this happens, put a comma before the conjunction. You really need to scan for these. The very next sentence has the same issue.

>Foxtrot Echo Alpha Romeo//

A little Easter egg, I see.

>Standby//

As one word, this would be an adjective. You need it to be two words.

>Power plant//

In engineering circles, that's usually one word.

>Access corridor secured.//

Three things: I'm surprised the ship is big enough to have anything that would be considered a corridor. The entryway wouldn't really be considered one anyway. And aircraft/spacecraft typically take on naval terminology, so it would use the term "passage."

>require-//

That needs to be a dash.

>They shot past her cracked and torn ivory towers//

I don't know what you're trying to say here. The way it's worded, it sounds like she owns the towers.

>Crack!//

Again, this kind of story isn't really suited to having sound effects in the narration.

>chair, her helmet striking the side of her flight chair//

Repetition.

>thick, slimy, saliva//

The first comma is warranted for the reasons I discussed earlier, but you never put a comma between an adjective and a noun/pronoun that follows it.

>Eject! Eject! Eject!//

You got the first two right. This is another thing I'd seen but hadn't commented on yet. When you have a word italicized for emphasis, include an exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>BANG!//

>Poof.//
Sound effects in the narration again.

>the cold nighttime air//

>through the nighttime air//
More close repetition.

>Straining her neck//

You'll normally set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>straining against the seat restraints//

Even though they're not the same words, that still sounds repetitive.

>God make them stop.//

Whether that's direct address or invective, it still needs a comma.

>She could tell her hands were bound//

>she could tell she wasn’t alone//
Repetition.

>That’s the name of the fish right?//

Needs a comma.

>its hard to read you//

Its/it's confusion.

>Astra- Why//

Use a dash.

>“Its probably better if I just show you,” Pavo sighed.//

He sighed a line of dialogue just a couple paragraphs back. When you use a nonstandard speaking verb, it sticks out easily if you repeat it soon after.

>first hoof//

That would be one word, like "firsthand."

>its strange to me, too.//

Its/it's confusion.

>That pretty much what I expected//

Seems like you meant to use "that's."

>you’ve probably already had the dreams, see the vision//

The verb forms don't match.

>Sisters-//

Use a dash.

>“Right you are, Elizabeth Warren,” Pavo smiled//

Non-speaking action.

>hawk-like eyes//

>beady eyes like a hawk//
Repetitive.

>Every sentient creature wiped in an instant. All except us.//

How do changelings live then? Where would they get love?

>“Why would they do that to their own and themselves.”//

Isn't that a question?

>I can only imagine such a fate as the ponies of Equestria and their leaders was a better one than if they succumbed to the nightmares invading.//

I can't parse that. Something's off in the phrasing.

>an old pain bubbling to the surface//

I don't know what this means. Is Liz feeling pain? Or does it appear to her that Pavo is?

>The mimicry,” he waved a hoof over himself, “it became a memorial.//

That one looks like you're trying to put a narrative aside in a quote. Here's how to format one:
The mimicry—” he waved a hoof over himself “—it became a memorial.

>Believing themselves to actually be pony.//

Ponies.

>Astra strode out the fire//

There are a number of times you use "out" by itself where "out of" would sound a lot less awkward.

>the grief genuine//

How does she conclude this? Just stating it as fact has her reading his mind.

>happen”//

Missing period.

>straightening up//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>the distraught Commander//

>the crying Commander//
Weirdly external references for Liz to use for herself, and a fairly repetitive phrasing.

Good story. Obviously there are lots of little things to fix, but it's just lots of instances of a small number of problems, so they're not that hard to fix. My only issue plot-wise is what the changelings have been eating if there aren't any other species available for love.

Just because the problems are mostly cosmetic, I would earmarked this story to be fast-tracked when it came back, but because they're so pervasive, I will have to do a full read-through again. That just means it's not a sure thing it'll pass, but it's headed in the right direction, and if you care to do the editing work, I could see posting it. I hope to see it get resubmitted.

AnonymousCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3501

>>3491
Hey, this is SpitFlame. I'm going over your suggestions for "Don't Look at the Fog," trying to fix any weird words or phrases, as well as any instances shifting perspective. I'm also gonna include a fairly lengthy first scene detailing what Twilight was doing with her friends before she went out to see the comets, as to add weight to her position.

In short, I'll try to take the Hemingway approach by simplifying the prose, keeping in mind that this is all though Twilight's POV. But I gotta ask: to what length do I simplify things? It's gotten to the point where I feel like I'm botching the atmosphere. For example:

>Just staring at the white vortex, that intangible pulp of gas—of those interlocking, contradicting constituent elements—it nearly left her in a stupor.


or

>As Twilight approached cautiously and uneasily (much to her surprise), the darkness about seemed to creep from every corner, as though the black, jagged shadows possessed a sort of latent sentience.


Do I change this kind of writing?

As for the ending, I'm gonna keep it more on the sad end, with her not seeing her friends, because it's supposed to be tragic. For Twilight, anyway.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3505

>>3501
Either one of those sounds fine, mostly, though "pulp" does seem like an odd word choice there. I'm not sure what idea you're trying to convey with it. It doesn't get me to visualize anything, and I'm not sure what you want me to picture with it. When I say something sounds strange, I don't mean that it's spooky or eerie or unsettling. Those can be very intentional. I just mean when it doesn't flow well, like a word choice that isn't right for the situation. It can also mean that the word or phrase doesn't feel like one the character would use, but that's not so much a problem for Twilight.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3507

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

It's a little strange that you submitted the story to us under the title of your chapter, not the overall story title.

>There was a wild forest around me and I had appeared on a small pasture.//

You have multiple clauses here, so you'll normally want to put a comma between them. And the normal phrasing would be in a pasture, not on one.

>It gave out a pitiful creak and I cringed//

Another spot that needs a comma. When there are two subjects that each get their own verb (It gave... and I cringed), put a comma before the conjunction. There are a few exceptions, but I'll deal with those if I see any.

>no worse for the wear//

Normal phrasing would be "no worse for wear" or "none the worse for wear."

>I caressed one of its wheels gently.//

I though she didn't trust wheels...

>pretty civilized//

>pretty clothes//
Those are pretty (heh) close together to repeat that word already.

>I frowned, confused at the creature’s answer. Did he like it or not?//

This is a pretty subtle thing, but it can have a big unconscious effect on your readers. The "confused at the creature's answer" feels like it's talking down to the reader. You almost always want to avoid explaining a character's mood directly. Especially in this case. The "Did he like it or not" very clearly portrays her as confused. The frown, too. So not only is it over-explain-y, it's also redundant with the nicely un-explain-y stuff you already have.

>I repeated the question.//

Same deal. She just repeated the question. I can see it for myself in the dialogue. You don't need to tell me what you just finished telling me.

>I waited for a few seconds and the silence became a little uncomfortable.//

Needs a comma.

>in annoyance//

Just like character motives and moods, you should avoid naming emotions outright. This kind of phrasing with an in/of/with emotion is almost always redundant with something else already in the sentence, like the flicking tail you have.

>in shock//

And just a sentence later, you're using the same kind of thing again. It'd do you well to develop an aversion to these phrasings.

>the guy said and I glanced at him//

Needs a comma.

>“Trixie is a pony and she can talk,” I pointed out the obvious fact//

The quote need a comma, and that's an odd choice of speaking verb, since the wording would require it to take the speech as an indirect object, but it's not a verb that can take one. At the least, you should make that attribution a separate sentence, but honestly, I'd cut that part out. Her speech gets the idea across perfectly well on its own.

>exclaimed “Aha!”.//

Needs a comma, like any dialogue would, and that period is extraneous.

>that silly kid’s show I used to watch//

Ah, so it's one of those stories. I'll stay tuned to see if this actually makes a difference to the plot, but I think it'd work better if they thought it as some generic performance art and weren't aware of MLP as a show. It's kind of cliched.

>I thought Discord had sent me to another dimension.//

It's getting repetitive that she keeps saying this.

>“What is that?!”//

If the girl is familiar with MLP, why do Trixie's fireworks surprise her?

>now useless//

Hyphenate.

>Damn spell… I//

Up until now, you hadn't been leaving a space after an ellipsis, but it's the better choice. You can't control typesetting on FiMFic, and it tends to format better this way, especially if you use a single ellipsis character instead of three separate dots (many word processors will automatically convert it to a single character if a space or other punctuation follows it, as has happened here), since you may end up with a line break in between the dots.

>That was the perfect place to spend a day in//

You don't need that "in."

>“Trixie Lulamoon,” I read the wording//

Cutting "the wording" would help you in two ways. One, it's pretty extraneous to have, since it's obvious that's what she's doing anyway, and two, it's another case of it making the grammar wonky.

>They all spoke about Trixie and the other ponies like we were all part of some kind of fictional show that had ended years ago.//

But it took the girl a minute to realize who Trixie was, and she got scared at Trixie just doing her usual antics. If this girl has tons of MLP stuff on her phone, especially about Trixie in particular, then she's not reacting right. Or if this is just Ttixie inadvertently doing a reverse image search or something, you need to describe more of what Trixie's actually doing with the phone so it's clearer.

>the instructions about logging in//

Wait, is she using this girl's account, or has she set up one of her own? Either way, that was quick for someone new to the technology to already know what this even is and how to use it.

>now useless//

Hyphenate.

>I felt the wagon shaking and the night outside was replaced by a bright day.//

Needs a comma.

>Jumping off the bed, I ran outside//

Note that participles mean things happen at the same time, but these two actions should happen in sequence, not simultaneously.

>A chuckle from above me made me jump like a spooked cat and I looked up at the grinning draconequus//

Needs a comma.

>“Horrible,” I drooped my ears//

The comma says you want that to be a speech attribution, but it has no speaking action. It should be a separate sentence.

>praising my thoughtfulness inside//

You're over-explaining things again. Since she's the narrator, have her actually, y'know, praise her thoughtfulness inside, instead of just telling me she did.

This was a cute story, but I was hoping there'd be a stronger conclusion to it. Yes, Discord can be a sore loser, but there' usually a method to his madness, a point he's trying to make. So what is it he wanted Trixie o learn from her punishment? And it was odd for her to find out that she was a TV show character without her ever seeming to understand that or having the story explore that any. It ended up not mattering that Trixie went to the human world, and nothing that happened there was important. It's just Discord having a tantrum, and really, anything could have occurred there, and it wouldn't have mattered what. The outcome would be the same.

Usually, what I'm looking for a "before and after." What's different about Trixie, the world, or her little corner of it because the story took place? What lasting consequences are there? Is she traumatized by the experience at all? Did she get some ideas for her show? Does the fact that she might be fictional mean anything to her? Did she find herself wishing Starlight were there to help her out of the situation?

It's a cute idea, and it's mostly well written. What can you do to give this a plot arc and some character development, so that it's not just a series of events that won't matter much tomorrow? What can you do to give the story a message for me to take away from it? A few of those questions I asked are some good starting places, but you can certainly come up with your own as well.

I wouldn't need to give this a full look-over again, so if you decide to address those things and resubmit, you can mark this as "back from Mars" to let us know it only needs a quicker spot-check.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3508

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

The first thing I want to point out is a pretty subtle part of perspective, one that many readers won't even consciously notice. You're using a third-person limited narrator in Mixtape's perspective. I can tell that because the narrator is taking a conversational tone and expressing Mixtape's opinions and thoughts as if his own. Essentially, Mixtape is the narrator, and this differs from first-person only by the choice of pronouns. So far, that's all fine.

However, you really have to take that to heart: Mixtape is the narrator. So the narration has to sound like him. It needs to have the same mannerisms, personality, vocabulary, intelligence, etc. as Mixtape. It shouldn't sound much different than his dialogue. You're pretty good on that front, too. Second, the narration has to be limited to what he can know or perceive. Again, you're fine there. But then comes the catch: the kinds of things the narration says have to be plausible in terms of how he's perceiving them or that they'd have his attention in the first place. So let me pull out some examples from early in the story.

>his yellow gaze//

What possible motivation would he have to mention his eye color here? I know readers like to get physical descriptions, even though they're often not necessary, but you have to find a way to make it reasonable he'd even be thinking about what color his eyes are. How often do you think about your own? Certainly not in a fleeting, incidental way like this.

>Threadbare, a cyan-colored unicorn//

This is a good friend of his. He already knows what she looks like. Why's he going to be running down a description of her in his mind? You don't do that with your own friends. If you want to work in a description of her, fine, but do it in a way that makes sense for what he'd be paying attention to. He might notice a new pair of earrings she had on, for instance, and comment internally that they matched her cyan coat nicely, but that whenever she flicked an ear, they banged against her horn. Now you've got a way to bring her color and race into his thoughts that's plausible for him to mention them. This is the kind of thinking you need to follow when deciding whether his narration should say something. 1) Is it something he can know or perceive? 2) Is it consistent with how he would know or perceive it? 3) Does it match his character voicing to word it the way you did?

>Mixtape’s large, curled ears//

Same as the first example: what's his motivation to mention the size and shape of his ears? Give him a reason to, or don't bother describing them.

On to other matters.

>medically-sterile//

You do hyphenate multi-word phrases used as single modifiers, in most situations, but when it's a two-word phrase starting with an -ly adverb, you don't, since there's no ambiguity in the chain of what modifies what.

>“Do you have enough…” she said her words between loud chomps on the wad of pink gum in her mouth, “...to retire on?”//

That speech tag doesn't quite work. Speaking verbs are supposed to take the speech as their direct object, but you've already given it one in "her words," so there's no longer a grammatical function for the quote. The ellipsis formatting is weird, too. Normally, in this structure, you'd replace the first one with a comma and just get rid of the second, but if you're trying to say she stopped speaking while that narrative action happens, there's a different way to format it... except that wouldn't make sense, because the aside says quite the opposite. So she doesn't stop speaking for the aside, and there's a format for that, too:
>“Do you have enough”—she said her words between loud chomps on the wad of pink gum in her mouth—“to retire on?”//
Also note that your first ellipsis is a single character while the second is three separate dots. That can cause typesetting problems. Mostly, it's the word processing software that automatically converts three dots to a single character, but it only does so when you follow it with a space, line break, or other punctuation. So for your second one, you have to trick the software into doing it, and it's not easy. The best way I've found is to put a space after, go ahead and type the next word, then highlight the space after the ellipsis and delete it. If you just backspace the space out after typing it, you'll usually make the software convert the single-character ellipsis back to three dots.

>Threadbare stared at him with her huge, blue eyes, and blew another small bubble.//

As a contrast to what I said earlier, it does make sense for him to note her eye color here, even though he should be familiar with it, because he's really paying attention to her eyes. However, you don't need either of these commas. The latter, because there's no new clause here—it's just the second part of a compound verb, not a new verb that gets its own subject (compare to the following sentence, which does have two clauses). And the former, because these are hierarchical adjectives, which gets down in the weeds to explain, but a fairly reliable test is to see if they'd sound really strange in reverse order. If so, they probably don't need a comma.

>huh?” she smiled//

That's captialized like a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb. How do you smile a sentence?

>“I bet there’s somewhere out there called Ponyville or something.”//

I have no idea what joke she's making. Is she unaware that there's actually a town named that and through dumb luck gets it right? If so, I still don't get the joke she's making. More likely, I think she's being sarcastic, and they're already in Ponyville, but you haven't said where they are, and after looking ahead a bit, you still don't later on, so how would I know for sure?

>He looked into the box of organized cassettes next to him, and lit up his long horn.//

Don't need that comma.

>urgency in his voice//

Okay, let's go back to the perspective issue. Is this how he would perceive his own urgency? By hearing it in his voice? This feels like an external evaluation of it, not his own. From his side, there are far more immediate ways for him to identify his own urgency, bcause he feels it before he says anything. What symptoms does he get from it? And this phrasing almost makes it sound passive, too, like it just happened that way, whereas he's doing it very deliberately.

>for awhile//

"Awhile" and "a while" aren't grammatically the same thing. You need a noun here to serve as the object of the preposition "for," so it has to be two words in this usage.

>store, playing tapes and records for the enjoyment of the whole store//

Watch the close word repetition. And why wouldn't the store be playing its own music? A turntable seems to be a pretty cumbersome thing to haul around just to play music there.

>Threadbare about her third foal//

Now I'm getting really mixed messages about how old everyone is. Threadbare has 3 kids of her own, but she aso has a brother young enough that he shouldn't be listening to explicit song lyrics. This could all stand to be clearer.

>Not since the CD had overtaken the market. Not since the patronage to his store fell into nothing.//

You keep hammering this point, and it's getting really repetitive.

>Three days prior//

This kind of makes it sound like you're saying it closed three days before the previous scene.

Look at this whole paragraph, though. After the first two very short sentences, the rest all end in a participial phrase. Try to avoid that kind of structural repetition.

>bandaids places haphazardly over his body//

Typo.

>Clomp-clomp.//

It's a bad idea to put sound effects in narration like this. They tend to create a comic or whimsical effect, which doesn't match your story's tone. Plus this is the formatting you've used for his thoughts, so it looks like he's thinking this. Just describe the sound.

>Mister Bristle was a hefty, tall light blue earth pony.//

Same thing I said before. Mixtape is familiar with this character. What's prompting him to give a full description?

>plummeted into bankruptcy//

Do you mean that in a legal sense? Because he hasn't described any legal proceedings.

>by far anything as complex as the soundboards in the recording industry or even a modern microwave//

I don't understand this phrasing. "By far" means he surpasses that. Something like "much less" would be closer to the meaning you're looking for. This is also fighting one of the major plot points. He's incapable of fixing CD players, but he still sells CDs. Just because he can't fix the equipment doesn't mean he can't sell the music for that medium. So what was stopping him from selling whatever the current format of choice is?

>his messy cyan-and-pink mane//

Why's he describing his own color? He has no motivation to, and it's not where his attention would be right now.

Why is Mixtape so fatalistic about finding another job? Does he expect he's just going to starve now? Not all ponies have jobs derived from their special talents. He could work as a waiter or salespony, for instance. I'm surprised he just immediately decides it's impossible he could do even the most menial of jobs.

>As Mixtape closed the door on the outside world; to the smells of asphalt in rain and hayburgers; the sounds of the ponies walking down the street and the taxis roaring on by.//

I don't understand your use of semicolons here. The last one could reasonably be the delimiter in a superlist, but not the first, since what comes before it isn't a list item. In fact, this isn't even a complete sentence.

>They were too busy on errands to slow down; to talk.//

You should be able to replace a semicolon with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but that wouldn't happen here. That's just a compound infinitive. A comma would do fine.

>His ears laid back against his head//

Lay. Those are tough verbs to keep straight.

>Their colors, cyan and pink, clashed against his purple pelt.//

See, here's a spot where it does seem plausible that he'd give some physical description of himself. This one works.

>It had been a storming//

This sounds like a military action. You have an extraneous word.

>sparsely-decorated//

Don't need that hyphen.

Through this part of the story about him getting his cutie mark, you're using simple past tense, which means it's still occurring in the story's present. You need to use past perfect, but you only are in a couple sentences.

>His grin fell, suddenly on high-alert//

No hyphen, and this says his grin was on high alert, not that he was.

>The fear still held fast to his eyes//

This feels more like an external evaluation, like what someone else would see. He can't see his own eyes to say what the expression was, but you could go with less of an overall summary and more of individual things he could tell he was doing, like if his eyes were wide.

>bubbled up old emotions//

But you don't say which ones. This is just vague. Not that you should directly name emotions very often anyway, but you might be able to get away with it here. Give me something to go on, though. This says practically nothing.

>yet, the piece that actually read the disk//

It's unusual for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>“Hey,” an unfamiliar voice pulled him from his reverie.//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>aesthetically-pleasing//

No hyphen.

>The stallion nodded and grabbed his changepurse from under her wing.//

Wait... who is "her"?

>“Mixxy…” he said it//

Another spot where you already gave the speaking verb a direct object, so it can't take the speech as one.

>There was hope in Equestria; hope in selling his box of overstock.//

>It was lunchtime; time to move elsewhere.//
Misused semicolons. Commas or dashes would do fine.

It's counterintuitive that Mixtape has just the one box with him on the street, yet to hear the way he talks about it, he has a pretty comprehensive selection in it. How big is this box? He conveniently has exactly the CD Coral wants.

That's not a good place to end a chapter. In a really long work, a chapter in the middle somewhere could do this, as long as it was infrequent, but it doesn't create any momentum heading into the next chapter. Mostly, you'll want a chapter ending to leave on a cliffhanger or to wrap up a plot point. This just kind of fizzles out. There's a little note of hope, but then you carry on past it, and nothing happens in the last bit.

In fact, not that much happens in the whole chapter. It's a big deal to Mixtape, but he doesn't get that emotional about it, so it's all pretty low-key. You're going to have a tough time enticing readers to give it a chance. His business has gone under, he's lost his place to live, and he's just kind of quietly stoic about it all. You have to get the reader in Mixtape's corner, and a lot of times, that takes being specific. His store is closing, but he doesn't come across as being that broken up about it. He does relate the anecdote of ponies who used to come by to play music, but it's left pretty vague. Same with his apartment. He's going to be evicted, but we don't know what this place means to him beyond a simple place to live. What details about it catch his eye and jog his memory? You have to use opportunities like this to bring it to life and make it vibrant. I think you're capable, but you've chosen a pretty mundane situation, so you need to do what you can to liven it up.

At first, I was concerned that all your other stories have been on hiatus for a long time, but you say you have this whole thing written. You should take all these points, particularly the mechanical ones, and scan through your other chapters for more instances of the same.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3513

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Right away, you have an accessibility problem. In the first paragraph alone, I get several words and phrases that I have no idea what they mean, nor are their meanings apparent from context: oneiric, "the supercelestial sphere that girds the firmament," asanic. If you're going to send the reader to the dictionary, that necessarily means they're taking a significant pause in your story, which isn't a good thing. Either that, or they're just plowing through without knowing what you mean, which isn't any better.

Then in that same paragraph, there's a subtle perspective problem that also introduces an unintended ambiguity:
>His tourmaline irises scintillating in the light of day//
The narration is voicing Trixie's opinions and impressions for him, so he's the limited narrator here. What's his motivation for mentioning his own eye color? I can't fathom why it'd be on his mind. It's irrelevant to what's happening. Plus I don't know what color you mean by "tourmaline." That's a generic term for a group of minerals that can occur in just about any color; Trixie's canon purplish color isn't common at all, so it's not what's going to come to mind when you use that word.

>where her devoted lover Trixie now laid//

Lay. These can be tough verbs to keep straight. Lie/lay/lain doesn't take a direct object, and lay/laid/laid does.

In fact, you're using a ton of very fancy language for Trixie. She doesn't speak at all like this in canon, and I realize you're making an AU here, but if you're going to make such wholesale changes from her canon personality/intelligence level, then why use her in the first place? You might as well construct an OC. Or else do something to bridge the gap between her canon self and your version, to show me how we get here from there, but do it soon. You can't string the reader along too far before it just loses the sense that this actually is Trixie in anything but name.

>Trixie stood up ,//

Extraneous space.

You're really overusing the parenthetical elements. You have one every paragraph or two, which is abnormally high. You want me remembering what I read, not your writing quirks. I did a Ctrl-f, and there are 26 of them in the chapter, which is actually a little more often than once every other paragraph.

>though he found such emotions confusing and, consequently, frightening//

There's an awful lot of background informing this, but we don't get to see any? Or have him reminisce about it at all? This is a pretty powerful part of his personality, but you're leaving it incredibly vague.

>Sweetheart//

That's just a generic term of endearment. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>as a part of the ‘reformation’ he was meant to be undergoing//

This is another big tease to a lot of background. I hope the story will get into what all this is soon.

>is’ he once overheard Twilight say//

Needs a comma, same as you would with any quote.

>ten-years-old//

No reason to hyphenate that.

>dead eyed//

But that does need one.

>wasn’t-//

Please use a proper dash.

>Has Spike gotten back from Rarity’s, yet?//

No reason to have that comma.

>Twilight, being not only very intelligent but also highly attuned to Trixie’s emotions, realized the stallion had mistaken her gentle reassurance for piteous condescension (as he was wont to do when it came to certain conditions of his), so she allowed him to change the subject.//

This really smacks of having switched to Twilight's perspective.

>still defensive//

But he doesn't act defensive. You're purely informing me of this; you need to demonstrate it.

>“Good,” Twilight kissed him once more//

The comma says this is a speech tag, but it has no speaking verb.

>self awareness//

>self esteem//
Hyphenate.

>Besides the few comforts all ponies need to live contentedly were the tools of Trixie’s mission in life; the mission of all magicians—and ultimately, of all living things.//

You have a number of questionable semicolons. You should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but the second part here wouldn't.

>nigh forgotten//

You're using this phrase as a single adjective that precedes what it describes, so hyphenate it.

>the most prominent being an old tepaphone he liked to tinker with, but could never seem to make work//

Unless I look up what a tepaphone even is, this doesn't create a mental picture at all. It's pretty meaningless.

>preferred,)//

Comma would go outside the parentheses, since it has meaning to the outside sentence, not the parenthetical element.

>Brushing the tangles from his hair and levitating the various pieces of his outfit around his physique, a thought struck him.//

This says the thought that struck him was what brushed his hair and levitated his clothes, not that he did.

>Are you ready, yet?//

No reason for that comma.

>Oh sh-//

Use a dash.

This is not a good place to end a chapter. The two best ways to do so are to end on a cliffhanger or to wrap up a plot point so that the next chapter will move on to something new. This just stops, and doesn't seem to have any purpose in where it stops. It doesn't so much conclude as feel like it got cut off.

>borne of Canterlot patricians//

Seems like "born" would work better there.

>life,” Trixie grinned//

Another non-speaking speech tag.

>Ponyville Express//

Newspaper titles get underlined or (preferably) italicized.

>who Trixie regarded as intelligent//

whom

>once azure//

Hyphenate.

>containing with the letter ‘X’//

Extraneous "with."

>death defying//

Hyphenate.

>it kept him Twilight’s good graces//

Missing an "in."

>Trixie shrugged//

Needs a comma here to separate the clauses.

>both parties going their separate ways//

The "both" here is redundant. It's not possibly for only one party to go its separate way, after all.

>This was meant to be a playful gibe at Trixie referring to himself in the third person during their talk with Cheerilee//

If you have to explain a joke, it's not really a joke. You don't need to spell this out. It's pretty obvious.

>in which lied the healthiest course of action//

lay

>Overwhelmed, instinct demanded//

This says that instinct was overwhelmed.

>manifestation,)//

Extraneous comma.

>“Uh, yes. I agree,” Trixie laid a light kiss on her cheek.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>exchanged warm greetings; with Twilight inquiring//

There's no independent clause after the semicolon, so it's not used right.

>Twilight hoped to sidestep the issue, along with any more of Rarity’s vexing double entendres.//

Four things here: don't over-explain Twilight's motivation, you have a non-speaking action used as a speech tag, having to explain it was a double entendre creates the same issue I brought up earlier about explaining jokes, and even having been put on notice that a double entendre is present, I still don't see it.

>The entire trend of modern Ponies’ naming conventions//

Why are you going off on this tangent? What relevance does it have?

>Express//

Underline or italicize, same as before.

>less trained//

Hyphenate.

>sis//

When usedthe same way a name would be, family relations get capitalized. Direct address is one of those situations.

>“Yeah, and Mom still gets mad at him over it,” Sweetie and Rarity both shared a chuckle.//

>Vice Chancellor,” Rarity held the folded-over paper//
Non-speaking actions used as speech tags.

>who had been in thought trying to discern what would drive Trixie’s father to make such a statement//

Who's holding the perspective here? You really haven't taken any viewpoint but Trixie's, yet this would have her reading Sweetie Belle's mind. Or else you've jumped to Sweetie Belle's perspective for only one sentence, for some reason.

>endeavoring to alter the course of the conversation//

You're over-explaining character motives again.

>th-//

Use a dash.

>five-hundred//

That doesn't take a hyphen.

>birth; when//

Another spot where there's no independent clause after the semicolon.

>“You’re ri-”//

Use a dash.

>“Don’t be silly,” Twilight was embarrassed, but not enough to stop him.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>once more, “Could I ask one more//

Repetitive phrasing.

>“It’s fine. Ask away, Sweetie Belle,” Twilight slid her hoof from Trixie’s, and casually nuzzled him.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Island,” she glanced knowingly at Trixie, before returning her gaze to Sweetie Belle, “That//

Same, and don't capitalize when re-entering a quotation.

>S-sweetie//

Normally, this would be the correct format, but since that's a name and has to be capitalized under any circumstances, capitalize all instances of the first letter in a stutter.

>Trixie had been preparing himself to make the following sacrifice, “No, it isn’t true.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Woah//

Don't be among the majority of authors who can't spell this right.

>was-”//

Use a dash.

>Twilight rebuked the whelping//

You used "whelpling" earlier. If he's actually whelping, there's a whole lot more going on here than I care to know.

>“Yes, and don’t forget,” Rarity held up the newspaper again//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

And just like I said of the previous chapter, this one picks a rather poor place to stop. It just ends, without tying up a plot thread or creating any tension. It just fizzles out, feeling more like you just ran out of things to write instead of drew it to a conclusion.

So there are a few mechanical/stylistic things, whatever I had to point out multiple times, but the biggie is that this is so densely purple that it's a rather impenetrable read. Very little of the fancy language is definable from context, and you shouldn't be forcing the reader to either skip those words or leave the story to consult a dictionary. This really feels like you grabbed every fourth word and looked it up in a thesaurus, deliberately picking the most obscure synonym for it, quite possibly without considering whether it suits the fine shade of meaning you wanted. There is a certain Victorian quality to it, I suppose, but you don't want to alienate a broad audience just to appeal to a niche one. Well, maybe you do, but a general audience is what we're geared toward.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3514

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>since the it’s founding, the woods outside the seaside town of Serenity Falls have been haunted.//
You have an extraneous "the," and you've confused it's with its. Also, this tends to say the woods' founding, not the town's. It's fine to double-space between sentences in that it's not grammatically incorrect, but it can break FiMFiction's typesetting. This will depend on the individual browser and device being used, but on my computer, there's a line break between the second and third sentences of your synopsis, and that line break's ended up between the two spaces, meaning the second one looks like a small indentation on the next line. There's nothing you can do to stop FiMFic from doing this, but it won't happen if you single-space.

>fifty four//

fifty-four

>the Equestria's//

Why do you have "the" in there? Also, the second comma in this sentence is a splice. It's just tacking two complete sentences together without a conjunction.

>Hope Is//

Why are these capitalized?

>just to keep the mystery alive...//

Authors like to do this, but really, when would you in an actual letter? Trailing off is a speaking affectation, because you're losing your train of thought or having your attention diverted or some such. Those kinds of effects don't happen when writing a letter, so it comes across as inauthentic.

>With love, Princess Twilight Sparkle//

The signature should be on a separate line from the closing. This comment and my previous one both apply to Celestia's response.

>A warm ocean breeze blew across her face//

Pronouns work by referring to things that have been previously named. so it's always a bit odd to have the first reference to something to be by one. I can presume this is Twilight, but it takes you 6 paragraphs to say so.

>“Come on Spike,” she gave a nod//

The way you've punctuated/capitalized that, you're trying to use it as a speech tag, but it has no speaking action. You can't just tack any action onto speech like this. You do this a lot.

>platform, “The//

Even then, when you transition back into the quote with another comma, the second part of the quote shouldn't be capitalized.

>They walked down from the simple platform, and began down that road, alone.//

That first comma isn't needed, since it's just two verbs assigned to the same subject. It's when there are distinct subject-verb pairs, or separate clauses, that you need a comma. It gets repetitive as well that you use "alone" again in the next sentence.

>the next train wouldn't be in for several days//

This is pretty much the same thing you just said.

>Inland//

Why is that capitalized?

>ago.” he offered, “Serenity//

That first period should be a comma to transition to the speech tag, but you can't go back in with a comma, since the to parts of the quote can't be crammed together into a single sentence. Basically, you need to swap your comma and period.

>one could see the entire cliffside...//

Why are you trailing off here? What sort of incomplete thought are you trying to convey? I don't see one. It's pretty cliched to do this, so make sure it's actually necessary.

>necessary.” she tried to sound friendly, “Whatever//

Yeah, you've just generally got lots of problems with your dialogue mechanics.

>your highness//

An honorific like this should be capitalized.

>she reached out to take the key.//

Capitalization.

>not wanting to offend a princess//

Your narration has been from Twilight's perspective, but this is from the innkeeper's. Don't jump around like that. And while he's questioning whether Spike is a pet, Spike isn't going to speak up for himself?

>She felt a bit guilty to be spending so much time on such a personal project when speciesism and xenophobia were still so prevalent. //

This is kind of an odd sentiment to throw in there. Is that part of her duties? Or something she feels is a personal responsibility? It's just a strange contrast to make when it's not going to be a theme for the story, and it doesn't come up again.

>his voice lowering to a hush//

Missing end punctuation.

>...once//

Go ahead and capitalize that since it's not picking up an earlier sentence he left hanging. Also, I see you're using fancy-style quotation marks, so you must be using software that automatically converts them. They'll typically convert three dots into a single-character ellipsis as well, which also helps with FiMFic's typesetting, since it might put a line break between dots if they're separate. It'll help head this off if you leave a space after an ellipsis, which triggers the automatic conversion.

>they was only one place//

Typo.

>spoke frightfully, as if even speaking//

>seemed to agree that the Mare was real, but none of them seemed//
These are just a couple of examples, but you need to watch for close word repetition like this.

>off-hoot//

I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Maybe you intended "off-hoof"?

>I don't get it Spike,//

Needs another comma to set off his name for direct address.

If Twilight isn't finding out anything about the ghost in town, how'd she even hear of it in the first place? She must have better records than they do at the source. I'm just getting really mixed messages about how well-known this ghost is.

>H-Hey//

Only capitalize the first part of a stutter, unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway.

>cozy looking//

Hyphenate.

>We have a bit more investigation to do tomorrow...//

I don't understand why she's trailing off here. It's a complete thought without a continuation implied.

>a list of ponies to ask for details//

When did she get this? In the previous chapter, she was lamenting the lack of anyone who would tell her anything, so how does she suddenly have a list of ponies who will? At least she does say it was difficult to get them to talk, but I'm not clear on how she even knew who to talk to.

>they’d burned any notes they had//

Why would they do this? Twilight never says, and it doesn't seem reasonable. It feels more like narrative convenience to make her task harder than a plausible turn of events, unless you explain it.

>who she hadn’t terrified enough//

whom

>Even talking about her was enough, in the mind of the town, to bring about her ire.//

See, this is pretty key to what I was talking about, but you're just glossing it over. I haven't actually seen her trying to pry information out of anyone, so I just have to accept this narrative vagueness for one of the more important elements to the plot. The only instance was with the innkeeper, and he wasn't that reluctant to talk.

>Inn//

Why is that capitalized?

>I dunno Twilight//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>vaguely recalled that this region had been of strategic importance in a war//

Somehow, it doesn't seem like Twilight not to know that.

You're suddenly using a lot of colons in this chapter. It's an unusual punctuation mark, and like anything unusual, it's very easy to overuse. You want me remembering what I read, not the fact that I saw a bunch of colons.

>A soft glow shown through the windows//

shone

>her insatiable need for answers bid her continue//

bade

>Around the room//

You start two sentences in a row with that, and it's not done in a way that makes it look deliberate for effect.

>At the back of the room//

This is the fourth sentence in a row to use "room."

>dias//

dais

>dress - Twilight could hear the wet hissing of her breath - her //

Use a proper dash.

>She gasped as she yanked it back, only to have it nearly torn from the socket as the dark bride grabbed it, her veil exploding in tatters as she turned swiftly on Twilight, who was momentarily frozen as she beheld the full sight of a face, pale white, rotting skin pulled over the bone like rags, seaweed and brine oozing from the empty sockets of her eyes which penetrated twilight as if her very soul was naked in the frigid wind, rotten seawater gushing from her carnivorous mouth as she let out a shriek like a thousand pieces of glass shredding through Twilight's body like it was made of paper.//

Really? That's all one sentence? It's also incredibly repetitive. There are 5 different "as" clauses here. It's a bad idea to have more than 1 in a single sentence. It gets really clunky, since it over-specifies what happens when, and it synchronizes actions that shouldn't be. You also have a lower-case "twilight."

And it continues. 4 of the next 5 sentences have an "as" clause.

>“Couldst not leave well alone, foolish child princess!//

You're missing a word or something. That doesn't make sense as written. And why do you have a line break after it?

>Hoof//

Why is this capitalized?

>Pleases she can understand. Understand I?//

I don't understand why she would speak so poorly. It's not like it's a foreign language to her?

>“Try? She must try??

NO. SHE MUST DIE!!!”//
One of each punctuation mark is plenty.

>above the churning see//

sea

You're also in another big stretch of "as" clauses here. In this paragraph and the previous one, there are 6.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3515

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

This really needs a better hook. Your first sentence sounds like thousands of other stories on the site. What can you do to make it stand out?

>Rainbow Dash you shiftless//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Thinking huh?//

Needs a comma.

>“Says the pony spying on her brother’s date,” Rainbow crossed her front legs together with a smirk.//

The comma says that narrative bit is a speech tag, but it has no speaking action. You can't tack just any action onto a quote.

>Rainbow opened her mouth but this time she was ready.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>snippily//

This is already evident from what she says. Don't throw in needless descriptors. They make the story weaker, because they hand-hold the reader.

>Rainbow look—//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>‘bout//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward. You can paste one in the right way, or you can type two in a row and delete the first.

>wishing she had put it another way//

Don't over-explain character emotions and motives. Let her actions and dialogue speak for themselves.

>indignant, almost hurt, expression//

Same deal. Don't tell me how Dash feels. Demonstrate it through how she looks and acts. Be specific. How do people in that mood behave? Have Dash do those things. If she were an actor needing to portray that emotion on stage, what would you tell her to do?

>in agitation//

And really avoid these "in/of/with emotion" phrases. They don't demonstrate the emotion, and they're often redundant with some action you're already having the character display.

>‘Sides//

Backward apostrophe.

>no Applejack//

>Applejack don’t sell yourself short//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>Rainbow patted her shoulder, “some//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag, and it doesn't parse for both parts of the quote to be a single, connected sentence, so you shouldn't have it lower-case here.

>She looked morose.//

You've been using Applejack as your perspective character. How does she know what she looks like? That's not what would clue her in to how she was feeling anyway. You don't have to look in a mirror to know you're sad.

>That I ran roughshod over my own big brother until he became the quiet middle kid.//

Well... I can see her feeling responsible, but the way she's saying this, it suonds like she thinks there's something wrong with being quiet.

>think you it’s because//

Extraneous word.

>Rainbow gave a skeptical snort to make her feelings on that perfectly clear.//

You're over-explaining her emotion and intentions.

>mostly,” Rainbow leaned forward//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Rainbow shrugged.//

I want you to try something. Maybe you can just do it in your head, and maybe you'll need to edit a copy of the story to see it well. Try reading this, but skip any sentence that has dialogue in it. Just read the ones that are purely narrative. I'll even do a little of that to illustrate. Here are all such sentences for a stretch of a few paragraphs:
>Applejack snorted and shook her hoof off. She looked morose. She paused while she waited for Rainbow, who was clearly struggling to answer. Rainbow held up her hooves. Applejack smirked. Rainbow rolled her eyes. Rainbow prodded her with a hoof. Applejack scrunched her face. Rainbow gave a skeptical snort to make her feelings on that perfectly clear. Applejack couldn’t quite repress a snort. Rainbow leaned forward. Applejack tilted her hat back. She saw Rainbow stir and quickly preempted her. Rainbow leaned back, mollified. Applejack lightly punched her shoulder.//
See how plodding that is to read? Almost every sentence, one after the other, is so much the same. It gets very plodding to read when there's that much structural repetition. These all start with the subject, and all of those subjects are one of them by name or pronoun. They're almost all about the same length. They almost all have the same constant downward inflection. It help mask the effect to have all that dialogue mixed in, but you still need some variety in how you're constructing your narrative sentences. At some point, the masking effect of the dialogue isn't enough, and even before then, it'll have a subtle effect on how enjoyable it is to read. You do fine in the longer passages where there's little or no dialogue, but when there's a lot of it, you lose sight of the narrative variety. Mix it up some more.

>are.” Applejack pointed out.//

That one actually would work as a speech tag, but you didn't use a comma. And your choice of speaking verb is repetitive with the "point" earlier in the sentence.

>table,” Applejack eyerolled//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Rainbow snorted.//

And by now, a lot of these narrative actions are getting repetitive in a more basic way. There's lots of head shaking, shrugging, nodding, and snorting.

>Applejack took a bite. “Yeah, I know you weren’t being serious.//

So... is she talking with her mouth full? Seems like that would bear saying. Or that she finished chewing before she spoke.

>Rainbow helped herself to her own apple. “So yeah.//

Same thing.

>in surprise//

Cut this. It's telly, and it's just repeating what's already evident from what Dash just did.

>Realizing how loud and upset she’d become//

This is all self-explanatory.

>“Yeah, I got that,” Rainbow coughed.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>I wasn’t there so maybe I don’t know the whole score.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>I can’t huh?//

Needs a comma.

>if it all it took//

Extraneous word.

>that—” Applejack sighed, looking depressed, “—but//

Looks like you're trying to do a narrative aside here. The formatting is mostly right, but the aside shouldn't have a comma. But this is another spot that doesn't work for being in AJ's perspective. How does she know that she looks depressed? She can't see herself.

>It’s not that you shut him down or pushed him aside or anything//

Needs a comma after this to separate the clauses.

>She crossed her two of her feathers together.//

Extraneous word.

>“Well, yeah,” Rainbow shrugged.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>settling for staring out and watching the sunset//

So isn't she thinking or something? We're in her perspective, so we should be privy to whatever's going through her head.

>Rainbow Dash shook her head.//

>Applejack shook her head.//
Lots of these narrative actions have continued to be the same few over and over again. These two are even in the same paragraph.

>like—” she sniffed and stopped//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>“I’m sorry.” Rainbow mumbled.//

Punctuation.

>S’alright//

You did something like this earlier with S'all, but that's not whre the missing letters are. This should be:
'S alright

>Applejack’s voice sounded tight, but seemed to lessen after she cleared her throat.//

This could potentially be from her perspective, but it doesn't really feel like it. The "sounded" and "seemed" feel more like someone else's impression of her than her own experience of it.

>I don’t know which one of us right//

Missing word.

>“And you can’t pay me back for this, since I don’t have any siblings. So have fun with that!”//

Except by the way Dash reacted to the mention of Zephyr Breeze earlier, AJ could easily get her back that way.

>It was good to be helpful.//

So you've spent the whole story in Applejack's perspective, only to jump over to Dash's for a single sentence at the end? That's a bad idea. The whole point of the limited narration is to get the reader close to AJ's character, then you abandon it right as the story comes to its conclusion. Taken in isolation, it's not a bad line to end on, but it's really undercutting what the perspective does for the story. This is absolutely the wrong time to be head-hopping.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3516

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

>Pegusi//

Pegasi

>same, gentle//

You don't need that comma. If two adjectives would sound really awkward in the opposite order, you usually don't need one.

>the lost soul that played within the ponyquins have transferred//

You have a singular subject (soul) with a plural verb (have).

Your framing device for the story just isn't working. First, the narrator addresses me explicitly. He knows I'm there. Now I'm a party to the action, and like any character, I need a reason to be there. Why am I listening to him? Why does he want to tell me this story? Under what circumstances is he doing so? Because you're telling the story in present tense as well, even more is implied. At the end of the first scene, where the narrator gets his gear together and leaves, that means I must be gong with him, since I'm still there as he picks up narrating the next scene. So what's my purpose in going?

>Perhaps I can turn this into a learning experience for Twilight’s students; using Celestia’s light to help those from beyond.//

If a semicolon is used properly, you should be able to replace it with a period and have two complete sentences, but that wouldn't be the case here.

Now, look how often you're directly identifying character moods and emotions here:
>pang of guilt//
>a comforting hoof//
>sigh of relief//
There's a section at the top of this thread that gives a brief overview of "show versus tell," and it'll explain why these tend to feel more distant.

>my abilities as a lantern keeper//

He'd been capitalizing his job title earlier.

>I always have doubts; that little voice in the back of your mind wondering about all the possible disasters waiting just around the corner.//

Another misused semicolon.

>Exorcising the Carousel Boutique//

There's no reason to insert "the" in front of the shop's name.

You have so many short, punchy paragraphs that they quickly lose their effect. That's supposed to add emphasis, but when everything's emphasized it's the same as emphasizing nothing. And it leaves your story feeling very choppy. You need to consider how many of these really warrant being treated special like this.

>I begin to chant my family’s mantra; a phrase passed down through generations.//

Misused semicolon.

>exploding successive light in turn//

Typo.

>Glancing at the room numbers, it//

This says that "it," whatever it is, is the one glancing at the room number.

>I skid do a halt//

Typo.

>I can’t be teleporting, I would’ve noticed the magic flash if it were.//

What does "it" refer to? Seems like that should be "I."

>drawers-//

Use a proper dash.

>Looking back to the mirror, the figure//

This says the figure is looking in the mirror.

>small, pink//

No comma.

>Inching closer to the mirror, the filly//

This says the filly is moving toward the mirror.

>A hideous scream erupts from its mouth, bearing down at me with a mouth full of jagged teeth and black pits where the eyes would be.//

This doesn't make sense. The participles have to give action to a noun or pronoun, but the only ones available are the scream or the mouth. The scream wouldn't have teeth, and the mouth doesn't have a mouth. You have some consistent problems with dangling participles, where they try to describe something that isn't in the sentence.

>sending a bolt of panic shooting through me//

This is another problem with the story. If you're panicking, what's going on in your head? You'd be mentally shouting, desperately trying to think of a way out, casting your attention all around, and probably having your train of thought jumping around. Yet the narration sounds so calm and factual. In a limited narration (and it doesn't get any more limited than first person), the narration is the perspective character's internal musings. They need to be appropriate to the mood of what's going on. You're undercutting the tension by making his mental process sound unemotional. Just after this passage, things improve a bit on that front, but it's been pretty bland until now.

>Just what kind of magic was Princess Twilight using to attract such wickedness to her castle?//

This comes out of nowhere. Why would it naturally follow that Twilight must be doing this? This feels like some background I should have had already.

>Run, A little voice whispers in my ear.//

Capitalization. That should be treated the same as any speech tag.

>needless fears//

Yet the narrator hasn't expressed any fears.

>back in the hallway.

>
>Turning back//
Watch the close word repetition.

>in frustration//

The further issue with this kind of "in/of/with emotion" phrasing is that it's almost always redundant with an action already in the sentence that demonstrates the emotion well enough on its own, as is the case here.

>Getting back to the task at hand//

3 of the last 4 sentences have started with a participial phrase. Don't be so structurally repetitive. Participles are also a fairly weak way to start a sentence.

>achieved//

This stands out as a really strange word choice. I don't know what you intend it to mean.

>ponyville//

Capitalization.

>Goosebumps//

Why is that capitalized?

>faulter//

Is that a British spelling? I've never seen it as anything but "falter."

>O’ Lantern of Souls, o’ guiding light./

What are the apostrophes for? "O" is a legitimate word, the same as "oh." With the apostrophes, you're making them a shortened form for "of."

>it-//

>she’ll-//
Use a dash.

>Sparing a glance out the window, everything appears normal.//

This says everything is sparing a glance.

>Gingerly placing my hoof against each step, there//

And this says "there" is gingerly placing his hoof.

>third-floor//

Np hyphen.

>My heart’s a jackhammer; adrenaline’s pumping in my veins, mind awash with all manner of possible threats; each one more terrible than the last.//

Misused semicolon, and the narrative tone hasn't been matching his mood.

>Leaping away, my horn flares to life//

This says his horn leapt away.

>Locking eyes with the creature, my lantern reveals the full extent of its monstrosity.//

This says his lantern locked eyes with the creature.

>Wiping the sweat from my brow, I raise my lantern to get a better look at the room; but not before weaving a small protection ward, just in case.//

>The walls are lined with dozens of books, far too many to sift through in one night; although it looks as though Twilight has already done most of the legwork.//
Misused semicolons.

>In its centre//

"Its" refers to the room, but that's located so far back that there are lots of other possible antecedents in between. It isn't clear.

>the-//

Use a dash.

>Wait, what was that sound? A rattle? A groan? I snap back around to face the gargoyle, but it remains still. I know I heard something… didn’t I?//

Finally! This is the kind of narrative tone the story's needed all along. It's conversational, it communicates his mood, it feels like an authentic thought process under the circumstances. You need to be doing a lot more of this.

>Trotting back to the table, I place my lantern down//

Another potential problem with participles is that they mean things happen at the same time. Make sure that's sensible. Here, he wouldn't place the lantern down until after he'd trotted to the table, yet you have him doing them simultaneously.

>My lantern isn’t getting brighter, and the dark magic only grows; swirling around in a winding spiral as it sucks in everything.//

Misused semicolon.

>I’m losing my footing! It’s sucking me in! I’m trying to run, but I can’t escape its pull!//

Nine of the last 10 sentences have ended with an exclamation mark. Like my earlier comment said about numerous short paragraphs, emphasizing everything has the same effect as emphasizing nothing.

>o’ bringer of light, o’ guider of-//

No apostrophes, and use a dash.

>I’m in luck, it’s right beside me; the only source of light in this Celestia forsaken place.//

Misused semicolon.

>It’s lit, but only just.//

Then why couldn't he see it in the dark?

>those that seek the light//

When referring to sapient creatures, it's preferred to use "who" instead of "that" or "which."

>O’ great Celestia//

No apostrophe.

>Head my words!//

Heed.

That was a fairly creepy story, and not a bad homage to Lovecraft. There are a few problems, though, like the dangling modifiers and choppy style of short paragraphs. However, this also feels like two stories.

We start out with this protagonist investigating something pretty vague. He already knew it was a child and that he'd seen it at Carousel Boutique, but were just briefly told that, so it doesn't carry much weight. Then he helps the filly, but we don't know anything about her predicament, so there's no sense of resolution in seeing her release. Glow immediately assumes Twilight's caused all this, but he doesn't say why he thinks that. He seems to have suspicion regarding the princesses even before all this started, but I can't imagine why. Then suddenly we're in eldritch horror territory, and it veered off on a tangent to get there.

Lovecraft is all about rich description, yet we don't get much exposure to what these horrors are. There's not much that the protagonist sees. Not that he needs to see the central threat directly—as they say, the scariest monster is the one you never see—but we do need to see evidence of it, and there isn't a lot that's disturbing to the senses. Plus it's mostly focused on what he hears and sees. Horror in particular needs to engage all the senses.

And again, the framing device isn't helping at all. I have no idea who I am to him, and after the first scene, I must still be with him, but he doesn't talk to me anymore, and I'm not experiencing any of this with him. Honestly, I think you should drop the frame. You'll still need some way to get me up to speed, though it'd be far more effective to work in that material gradually as it becomes germane to the action, instead of dumping a bunch of exposition up front.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3517

Chapter 1:
>A tentacle-like thing appendage//
Seems like you only meant one of those words to be there.

>You shall reveal me your secrets.//

Really needs a "to" in there, as "reveal" doesn't take an indirect object.

>The pink-maned, white-coated unicorn filly//

You're in her perspective, which makes the narration her thoughts. What motivation would Celestia have to describe herself?

>there seemed to be some form of predatory intelligence there//

Watch the close word repetition.

>Her magic reached out and a bundle of sticks floated up beside her.//

Needs a comma to separate the clauses.

>terracotta//

terra-cotta

>Where it touched the walls of its prison the color seemed to drain from the wood.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>…and I think it likes me. You will love it, Lulu.//

When we don't get the beginning of the sentence earlier in the story, go ahead and capitalize after a leading ellipsis.

>It can't be dangerous if you can carry it with a stick.//

This is a wonderful line of child logic.

By the way, I poked at you a bit about perspective in the previous scene. In this one, it feels more like you have an omniscient narrator. In that case, phrases like "the unicorn filly" are fine, as long as you don't use them too often (you don't). I still think that prior scene felt more like it was in Celestia's perspective than an omniscient one, because it was expressing opinions that Celestia would hold without attributing them to her. There's a fine line between the narrator stating an opinion of his own and stating it on a character's behalf, and you were a little on the bad side of it there, but in light of how this scene feels, you're more in a gray area overall.

>Her pink mane flew around as Celestia shook her head with worrying emphasis.//

Pronouns like to look backward to grab what they're referring to, and since the last character you mentioned was Luna, this tends to say she's the one whose pink mane is flying around. It caused a little speed bump in my reading, and if these weren't characters I already knew, I'd find it confusing.

>A shudder ran down Luna's back and she took a deep breath.//

>A golden aura alighted around the little unicorn's horn and the jute satchel opened.//
Needs a comma.

>Then she looked a the pastry//

Typo.

>The aura flickered and the bread fell in the bucket.//

Needs a comma.

>to purple eyes surfaced//

Typo.

>The golden glow reappeared around the satchel and a small flask floated out.//

>With a twist, the cork was removed and Celestia poured some milk into the bucket.//
Needs a comma.

>Four mismatched approximation of eyes//

"Approximation" should be plural.

>And if get all bloated//

Missing word.

>Blorp sounds kinda right but I don't think it's good for a filly.//

Needs a comma.

>everyponys mane//

Missing apostrophe.

>Uhm, I don't think I'll like to dance with a lot of clothes on.//

You have an extra blank line before this paragraph.

One thing I was looking for with this story: does it stand alone well enough? If not, then I'd just post it with the related story you already have on the blog. But a solo post is better for you, so I'm reading it to see if we can do that. The only hangup I have yet is that I just got several characters introduced as if I should know who they are. And I don't remember them appearing in the other story, so it's not exactly an issue with stand-alone-ness, at least with respect to the other story. I can follow who Sottile and Donna Copper Horn are well enough, but Luna brings up Millet in a way it feels like I'm missing a joke.

>Arch-mages//

You're inconsisten about capitalizing that.

>half rotting//

Hyphenate.

>two fillies laid on a bed of moss//

lay

>the tendrils marking the path of destruction left by the diminutive warrior slowly retreating and rejoining the main mass//

This was a little confusing at first. I thought it was saying the warrior was rejoining the mass.

Chapter 2:
>A few creaks and a very unladylike swear later//
This could really stand to be set off with a comma.

>nopony comes ever here//

A couple of those words sound out of order.

>Look, we put her down, and if she doesn't like it we'll find some other place." She put the bucket down, then put it on its side.//

Three uses of "put" in just two sentences,

>forth and back//

I don't know why you're reversing the normal order. It doesn't hurt anything, i suppose, but it doesn't accomplish anything either, as far as any apparent authorial intent.

>fang circled//

You're using this phrase as a single adjective, so hyphenate it.

>Her smile widened and she clopped her hooves together.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>brown coated//

Hyphenate.

>When there wasn't//

Needs a comma here to set off the dependent clause.

>again to her bowl and grabbed the spoon again//

Close repetition.

>"'s nothing."//

Capitalization.

>That could actually be a good thing, Luna tended to break easily under Donna Copper Horn's look.//

You have a number of comma splices like this, and while most of them don't seem too out of place for a child's perspective, this one did feel a little unwarranted.

>it—" Her sister raised her head. "—Only//

For a narrative aside breaking a quote, 1) don't capitalize the aside, unless it starts with something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway, 2) don't give the aside end punctuation, except possibly for an exclamation mark or question mark, if appropriate, 3) don't capitalize the speech the picks up after it, unless, again, it's a word that has to be capitalized anyway.

>face first//

Hyphenate.

>"Yes?".//

>I'm not stupid.".//
Extraneous periods.

>kitty—"Celestia bit her tongue"—but//

You got that one right, but the narrative part needs spaces to separate it from the quotes.

>high — sometimes unreasonably high, in Celestia's opinion — standards//

>the — was//
Don't put spaces around an em dash.

>laying on the floor//

Lying, and needs a comma after this to set apart the clauses.

Chapter 3:
>letting out a squeak//
You'll usually want to set off a participial phrase with a comma.

>he turned his head and rummaged in his saddlebags.//

Capitalization.

>stood simply//

These sound awkward in this order. I recommend swapping them.

>then become wider//

You've gone into present tense here.

>If you were worried//

Needs a comma here to separate the clauses.

>Luna pulled out her tongue.//

Did you mean stuck out her tongue? I'm not familar with this phrasing, unless it means she's gripping her tongue with her hooves or magic and pulling it out.

>looked down at the black mass covering her fore-legs. A couple of eyes looked//

Close repetition.

>and— and//

No space around the em dash.

>on the top of it//

In the sense you're using this, I've never heard it with a "the" in there.

>behaviour—" He stopped and bowed his head to the side. "—anything//

Aside formatting. It'd be one thing if you got it wrong but consistently so, but you seem to do it a different way every time.

>Master Sottile sorely missed his staff now, it would have helped understanding it better.//

Yeah, you've got lots of these comma splices, and while they could possibly suit the narrative tone while using the children's perspectives, it doesn't fit with Sottile. Donna's dialogue has a bunch of them, too.

Chapter 4:
>And then the small creature had come to It and had put itself between the threat and Itself.//
This is a confusing phrasing. It sounds like Celestia put herself between the threat and herself, which means she's in two places at once. The capitalization scheme does clear it up, but it's pretty hard to notice.

>"I don't know if it can do anything not wrong."//

I'm unclear who speaks this paragraph. I think it's Copper Horn, but I'm not convinced it isn't Sottile. Same with the preceding paragraph, for that matter. I think Garvino says it, but it might be Sottile or Copper Horn. You're relying on narrative actions associated with the quotes to inform who's speaking, but in several paragraphs, multiple characters have actions, and the speaker may not always have one at all. It's confusing. I think I can follow it, but I'm not certain.

>Blinking. Copper Horn looked to Garvino//

Did you mean that period to be a comma?

>the chords of a harp//

Chords refers more to the sound, not the actual strings, and that changes the meaning.

>of the cistern, projecting Luna's shadow on the floor of the cistern//

Repetitive phrasing.

>again fun//

Swap the order of those.

>but —"Her voice dropped even more, skipping on the border of the audible. "—maybe//

No spaces around the em dashes, needs a space between the quotes and the start of the narrative aside, and the aside shouldn't be capitalized or have end punctuation.

>here"–she tapped on it with her hoof–"and//

You actually have this one formatted right. Almost. You're inconsistent with whether you use em dashes or en dashes for them. You have en dashes here, which should have spaces on both sides. Em dashes wouldn't have any.

>It was a difficult choice to make, there were too many possible scenarios requiring different parts of Itself.//

Comma splice.

>The hammering of raindrops on stone and earth was a rustled in the distance.//

I'm not sure what you meant to have there, but this verb form doesn't parse.

>Soft, pink curls//

You don't need that comma, since these adjectives describe different aspects.

>and then it was over."//

Since she immediately picks up again with speech in the next paragraph, the convention is to leave the closing quotation marks off this one.

>When we walked back//

Needs a comma here to separate the clauses.

>I could see it."//

Again, you don't need the closing quotes here.

Chapter 5:
>laying on the surface//
lying

>"I don't like it."//

It's not at all clear who says this.

>Copper Horn closed her eyes, and took a deep breath.//

No need for that comma.

>it"–She squinted her eyes–"dried//

Capitalization, inconsistent dash type. And note that placing the dashes with the narration means she doesn't stop speaking for the action, so make sure that's what you want.

>when she sees a foal//

Needs a comma after this to set off the dependent clause.

>she can't really help herself and start stuffing them with food//

starts

>when we all started//

Needs a comma here.

>what we are having here//

That's a really strange verb tense for the situation. Just "what we have here" would do better.

>terracotta//

terra-cotta

>pulled out some herbs she threw in the kettle//

This is a really strange phrasing as well. It makes it sound like she's retrieving herbs from the kettle.

>Wh–Rust//

That should really be an em dash.

>took another small jar//

>took a pinch of green powder//
Close word repetition.

>She's still likes everything//

Typo.

>hungry looking//

Hyphenate.

>that– What– Must//

Dash formatting.

>There was a crunch//

Needs a comma here.

>Shaking her head//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>And–//

>contain–he snorted–Slimey//
Dash formatting.

>chewed through//

Hyphenate.

>I'm sorry Master.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>uni–//

>it–her//
Dash formatting.

>it's lines traced in ash//

Its/it's confusion.

>walked to the hole in the wall laid on his stomach to look through it//

Missing word.

>small, internal court//

No need for that comma.

>the fillies room//

Needs an apostrophe.

>but…I mean–//

Dash formatting, and you've been inconsistent about putting a space after an ellipsis.

>In the meanwhile//

You're mixing usual phrasings there. It's either "meanwhile" or "in the meantime."

>When they arrived//

Needs a comma here.

>turned his head and nodded towards them, then turned//

Close word repetition.

>Luna's head laid on Celestia's side//

lay

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3531

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>Rainboom's//
That should really be a plural possessive.

Story:
>Aviator//
Why is that capitalized?

>out-of-place//

You're generally only going to hyphenate phrasal adjectives like this if what they describe comes after them.

>Rarity purses her lips and holds a finger over it//

What is the "it" here? Her lips? If so , you're mixing singular and plural.

>speaching//

I guess I don't understand why this wouldn't be "speeching."

>12 minutes and 21//

Write those numbers out as words. They're short enough.

>called," she steals a look at her book, "'fashionably//

You did the correct formatting for a narrative aside in a quote earlier on, with the dashes and no commas. Do the same thing here.

>pulling out candy apple//

Seems like there's a missing word.

>See everyone?//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>We zoom in in//

Typo.

>clashing ... the//

You're inconsistent in how you space your ellipses.

>the smirk of winner//

Missing word.

>Then,"//

Needs a space. It's also broken your smart quotes. For that matter, you have a large chunk of story about 20% of the way through where you revert to simple-style quotes. Keep them consistent.

>cun -”//

>“- try//
Use a dash.

>its cut off//

Its/it's confusion.

>as they walk through the doors of Sugarcube Corner, a bell chiming as their shoes hit linoleum floors//

It's pretty clunky to have two "as" clauses in the same sentence. It sounds repetitive, and they can fight each other for the sentence's chronology.

>Ms. Cake//

Why not Mrs. Cake?

>sheek//

I don't get why you didn't spell it chic. If there's a meaning in that choice, it's gone over my head.

>her hair is seems//

Extraneous word.

>The - ah//

Use a dash.

>“'bout//

Capitalize.

>up?//

When you have a question mark or exclamation mark on a word italicized for emphasis, it's preferred to include that punctuation in the italics.

>small, "Oh!"s//

You don't need that comma, since it's not a direct quote.

>dies!//

Italicize the exclamation mark.

>the bands live structure to make the most three less members//

Seems like you're missing an apostrophe and a word.

>our new practice are//

Area, I presume?

>manically//

This could make sense as is, but I wonder if you meant maniacally.

>Rarity, who’s equip//

Typo.

>Rarity explained//

>Rarity rolled her eyes, but hardly meant it.//
Why are these in past tense?

>'part//

Why is that apostrophe there?

>her face become puzzled//

Typo.

>we cut to the wide shot shows Sunset walking into the barn//

Something's off in the phrasing.

>‘cause//

Be careful when you use a leading apostrophe. If you have the fancy quotes enabled, it will turn such an apostrophe the wrong way. You can paste one in, or you can type two in a row and delete the first.

>Sunset sighs out in frustration, holding her forehead in her hand.//

These "in/of/with emotion" phrases are rarely a good idea. They're often redundant with emotional cues already present, as is the case here. Sunset's behavior already makes it clear how she feels. You don't need to state it outright.

>Sunsets’s//

Typo.

>we see Applejack break into the scene and slings an arm over each of them//

The verb form of "slings" doesn't fit here.

>ya’ll//

I'm surprised by the number of people who don't know how to spell this. It's y’all.

>then gibes a flat line frown//

Did you mean "gives"? And "flat-line" would be hyphenated in this usage.

>They’ll have to back for it soon.//

Missing word.

>There's a pause, where Applejack and Rarity stay silent.//

Yes, that would be what a pause is. And you just recently had a "There's a pause" paragraph.

>Apple–”//

You'd been putting spaces around your en dashes.

>sugarcube”//

Missing end punctuation.

>I should this.//

>When Dash drop on the grass//
I don't know why I'm suddenly seeing so many of these obvious editing mistakes. Did you not read through this after you wrote it?

>‘cause//

Backward apostrophe.

>Dahs//

Typo.

>Fluttershy lies down//

You got the right verb here
>When Dash drop on the grass and lays down//
But not here.

>Rainboom's//

Rainbooms'

>manages a,//

When you put something like "a" in front, you're making it genric and not a direct quote anymore, so you don't need the comma.

>'Shy//

You don't always use the apostrophe. You don't really need it, though. It's just a nickname.

>Rainbow Dash using her free arm as a pillow//

You just used "her free arm" in the previous paragraph.

>know!//

Include the exclamation mark in the italics.

>She then points it to Pinkie and mouths, what happened?//

You're inconsistent at putting that comma there. (It does need one. And it needs to be capitalized, too.)

>speaching//

speeching?

>a, “Hi.”//

You don't need the comma or the capitalization.

>Oh, I’d love to see you try, Love.//

Why is "love" capitalized?

>‘aww’s//

You're inconsistent about whether you put this kind of thing in single or double quotes.

>Sunset pushes off the wall, and walks to the middle of the circle.//

You have a few spots like this, where you don't need the comma, because there aren't multiple clauses. This is just a compound verb.

>five-hundred//

That's not a spot where hyphens go in numbers.

>follow in suite//

I've heard of "follow suit," if that's what you're going for.

>every so sorry//

ever

>looks at Flutterhy with sympathy. “Look//

Repetitive word choice.

>“Now, breathe in – “//

Those closing quotes are backward, and I suspect many of them throughout the story are when they've been set off from a dash with a space.

>stops speaking in opt to hyperventilate instead//

I've never heard that phrasing It's weird. I would have expected "stops speaking in order to" or "stops speaking, opting to."

>simple base line//

bass

>the focus in on Fluttershy//

Something's not right here, but I don't know what you meant to say.

>Twilight looks down at her book.//

This is a narrative aside, so don't put a period on it.

>five-hundred//

That's not where hyphens go in a number.

>They share one more small, seemingly smaller laugh in comparison to the sky that engulfs it, before watching the sky in content silence.//

I don't know if I'm supposed to be getting anything clever out of this. It just feels repetitive with two uses each of "small" and "sky," and the "small, seemingly smaller" doesn't really even make sense to me.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3546

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>they finds//
>they decides//
Typos. Unless you're trying to be weirdly gender-neutral and use a singular verb for this on purpose, which 1) will confuse most readers and 2) you aren't even consistent about:
>they've
>pay

Chapter 1:
>worn out—tired//
I don't see what that "tired" adds. It makes the sentence choppy, and it doesn't change my understanding of anything.

>But, work was not exactly what I had always dreamed it would be.//

It's only under certain circumstances that a comma after a conjunction is appropriate. It isn't here.

A word about "to be" verbs—they're boring. Nothing happens. It can be awkward and cumbersome to avoid them altogether, particularly in dialogue, but it's a good idea to use more active verbs where you can. Too many of these ones just makes a story feel stagnant and lose momentum. So when your very first paragraph already has 4 of them (was, was, be, were), it sets the tone for the whole story. You do want to create the impression that your story will lack action.

>together, played some music, went out to a club, or just chilled together//

Kind of repetitive use of "together."

>I poured myself a long glass of orange juice//

Also repetitive with the "something cool and long" she mentioned recently.

>I poured myself a long glass of orange juice, and retired to the living room.//

That comma is unnecessary, since it's only separating a compound verb, not distinct clauses. There's a brief discussion on "comma use with conjunctions" at the top of this thread that will explain.

>My phone beeped again. Already in a conversation with someone, it would only make that sound if a different person sent me a message.//

This is a rather obtrusive thing to put in there. It's way too explain-y. Consider that the narration is essentially her train of thought. Why would she need to work through an explanation of this to herself? It sounds more like her explaining it to an audience who doesn't know how phones work. There are subtler ways to go about something like this.

>I smiled, at least he had read the profile I had posted.//

Comma splice. And would this really relieve her? If it was someone randomly contacting her, it would worry me less than someone who had researched me first, but I guess it depends on the nature of the app.

>It was such a corny, and well-used pickup line//

When you have a conjunction between a list of only two adjectives, don't use a comma.

>lifted it to my mouth—took a sip.//

Some of these dashes you use are really awkward. And I'm not sure why you prefer it this way. I can't say it's wrong but it does feel unnatural, so it does harm the story's flow. A comma would be fine here, and I'm not sure if you were simply worried it wouldn't be. But it'd essentially be a list without an "and," something called asyndeton.

>The usual reply of, "Only the pretty ones,"//

You don't need either comma. This isn't being presented as a formal quote, so it doesn't have to obey all the rules of one.

>Or, he's a player and uses the same corny lines on all the girls he chats up.//

No comma.

>we can chat more?— I asked.//

I'm not sure you meant to format it this way, but did you mean that "I asked" to be in the same formatting block? It'll differ by device and browser, but that "asked" ended up on the next line, so "I" just kind of hangs out by itself and looks wrong. The reader will catch on by now that the right-justified stuff is Rarity, so they don't ned to be reminded of it here anyway. I don't think you need the dialogue tag.

>I ignored the thirty-six messages from Rainbow Dash, and activated the app she had forced upon me.//

No comma.

>No one with all positives existed, unicorns were in Equestria, not Canterlot.//

That first comma is a splice. Now, splices can be used to effect at times, but Rarity is a pretty formal speaker, and this isn't a situation that has her scared, angry, or otherwise far out of her element, so it just doesn't seem to suit her.

>Reading the profile, it seemed to be the absolute minimum to fill in to make a profile.//

Repetition of "profile," and by this phrasing, "it" (whatever "it" is) is the one reading the profile.

>I watched the message counter on Rainbow Dash's name tick up by two more, and swapped to a browser window. I simply typed his nickname into a search engine, and tapped go.//

Neither of those commas should be there. I'm going to be spending hours copying out examples of this if I keep at it, so I hope you get the picture by now. I'm not going to mark any more.

>I said, my voice betraying my intrigue//

This is a subtle but important aspect of perspective. If she's intrigued, that should come through the tone of her thoughts, i.e., narration. The fact that she'd even notice what her voice was doing doesn't put her attention in the right place. It also creates the chain of evidence that she realized she was intrigued from the sound of her voice, which doesn't make sense. You don't have to listen to your voice to figure out how you feel.

>(the app he had contacted me through)//

We should already know this. If you've mentioned it before, this is redundant. If you haven't, then you should have. This also isn't something she'd reasonably think to herself, which makes the narration feel less like her stream of thought and more like something for the benefit of an audience she's aware of, but you're not framing the story that way.

>grabbed up the work I still had to finish, and shoved them into my folio//

A little disconnect there in the collective (treated as singular) "work" being the same thing as the plural "them."

>Pulling out into traffic, I was startled when—rolling forward—the brakes suddenly locked up and stopped me; just as a large pickup was swerving into the lane I almost entered.//

Okay, numerous problems here. Let's break it down. As placed, "rolling forward" tends to describe the brakes, and once again, it's awkward to have it be a harsh break with dashes. The participial structure means that things happen concurrently, so she pulls out into traffic at the same time she stops, whereas they more reasonably would happen one after the other. And the semicolon isn't used right. You should be able to replace one with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete, but the part after it here would be a fragment.

>No sooner was my key in the front door lock and turning, than my phone beeped.//

No comma here.

>The message was Rainbow Dash asking if I was interested in going to a nightclub.//

Again, his sounds more like she's explaining this for the reader's benefit than actually thinking it to herself. Who would actually think this? If she just made an offhand remark about it being Dash, the reader can put two and two together to understand this.

>—If you must know, I am awaiting a reply from that guy I mentioned last night.—//

Formatting again. FimFic put that ending dash on a line by itself. I'm not familiar enough with all the formatting options to know what would be the best way to fix it, but it's worth looking at things like this to see how they appear on screen before you publish them.

>I also don't want NotABug to contact me//

This shouldn't be in present tense.

>I sent.//

I get it by now. This helped the first time you did it, but after that, these attributions on the texts are really obtrusive. I wouldn't recommend using them after that first one.

>but there was some things//

Mixing singular/plural.

>If either of us think the answers are too short, we get to ask a question.//

In this case, "either" would be treated as singular, so that should be "thinks."

>I was all-in, he was a stranger after all.//

Comma splice.

>—So you read my bio before looking at my cleavage?—//

Maybe intentionally on your part, but this makes her rather hypocritical. She was complaining earlier about people only paying attention to that, so she could head off the problem by having a picture that didn't show any. So for whatever reason, it's worth it to her to use that photo.

>sleeze//

sleaze

>Expecting him to ask a deeper question was one thing, having him spend such on something so strange made me remember he was a programmer, after all.//

The first comma is a splice. A semicolon would do fine there.

I don't understand why you'll let his texts go all the way across the screen, but you're taking care to truncate hers so they stay more right-justified. Shouldn't they both have about the same width?

>Reaching for my glass of juice, I took a slow, satisfying drink.//

Synchronization again. She wouldn't take a drink until after she'd reached for it, but this says she does both at the same time.

>I would look deeply into your eyes.//

I guess I'm a little surprised Rarity doesn't react to the fact her question related to a hypothetical girl, while his response was directed at her.

>Using my magic, which Twilight said I shouldn't use except when necessary, I collected a tub of ice cream from the freezer and a long-handled spoon.//

Does she have levitation power, though? I don't remember her ever doing that.

>But, he had come back with something actually sweet//

No comma after the conjunction.

>ice-cream//

You hadn't been hyphenating that until now, but the next couple are.

>neither of those have//

Same as before, this would be singular: neither of those has.

>Are, you there?//

Why is that comma there?

>I felt its joy//

>The drive home was a joy//
These are in consecutive sentences. I can't tell if you did this on purpose, but it doesn't come across as such. There's an art to letting the reader know repetition is deliberate. The three typical ways are to use words like "still," "again," or whatever else might be appropriate to acknowledge it; to use italics in the right spot to acknowledge it; or to use the repeated element at least 3 times.

>Collecting a fresh tub of ice-cream, a spoon, and my usual juice, I settled down at the end of the couch//

You have a consistent problem with these participial phrases synchronizing actions that shouldn't be.

>and pulled a comforter (kept folded under the coffee table for just such a situation//

Pulled a comforter where? And you never closed that parenthesis.

>work my work//

Repetitive.

>Snapping the shot, I double-checked the picture//

More synchronization issues. I won't keep marking these, or they'll pile up and really slow me down, but you need to scan for them.

>Although, it was mostly seeing//

Comma after a conjunction again.

>ten-thousand//

That's not where hyphens go in a number.

>back on the couch, and had to fight to keep tears back//

Close repetition.

>Staring at the patterns, my creativity seemed dead.//

This says her creativity was staring at the patterns.

>against my friends and I//

People make this kind of mistake all the time because they're deathly afraid of using "me" where it should be "I." In this case, "me" is actually the right answer. To illustrate, have her be the only one. Which sounds right, "against me" or "against I"?

>was five calls//

Mixing singular and plural.

Whatever emojis they exchange aren't coming up in the story. I just see an empty square.

>There was just words//

Mixing singular/plural again.

>I tried to work out what to do, there was no keypad appearing to type on.//

Comma splice.

>H-Hello//

Unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalize the first part of a stutter.

>It's body was inky-black//

Its/it's confusion, and you don't need that hyphen.

>W-W-What//

Only capitalize the first part.

I guess I'm really surprised that Rarity isn't put off in the least by seeing him for real. She's never encountered anything like this, and she immediately wants to hug it?

>started to cut through my emotional wreck, and I started//

Close word repetition.

>I saw my folio laying on the floor//

Lying. Those are tough verbs to keep straight.

>"I don't know why talking to him in person seemed so important, when all I needed was some good rest.//

Missing your closing quotes.

>practically pranced through the house to begin my day. I had the laundry on, practically//

Close repetition.

>bra and panties I wore under my work clothes was//

Mixing singular/plural again.

>Bright, summer colors//

You don't need that comma. The non-foolproof test is to see if two adjectives would sound really awkward in reverse order. If so, you don't use a comma.

>my bosses number//

You have a plural where you need a possessive.

>Looking at it, the text//

This says the text looked at it.

>"That worm couldn't get me fired if she wanted to.//

You need to start a new paragraph here.

>hope the promotion goes unnoticed//

Why are you in present tense?

>broke the peace of my thoughts, "Just don't let her break//

Close repetition, and you're trying to use something without a speaking action as a speech tag.

>this,"—I gestured at the empty folio—"around//

You almost have this format right, but there shouldn't be a comma.

>black, Swiss Viole fabric//

No comma.

I've been floating through this scene so far, kind of confused. Does Rarity not remember him emerging from the phone?

>It was just as I imagined; just as I designed it.//

Not really a correct use of a semicolon.

>Mottled alabaster skin//

She just used "alabaster" a few paragraphs ago. That's too soon for keeping an unusual word like that from sounding repetitive.

>Turning, I created a single-faceted plate out of my magic, and hovered it around as I turned//

Close repetition.

>Reality was the bane of a muse. It cramped them, restricted them.//

What does "them" refer to? I don't see anything plural that she's said.

>reassuring hug of my bra, and the tug of the g-string were reassuring//

So the reassuring thing was reassuring? You don't say...

>W-What's//

Only capitalize the first.

Okay, so she does recognize him now. But her reaction is inconsistent. The first time, she immediately wanted to hug him, but the second, she backs awway and refers to him as a monster.

>There was multiple tones//

Mixed singular/plural.

>W-When//

Only capitalize the first. I think you get the picture by now. I won't keep marking these.

At this point, I'm going into skim mode. I'll explain why at the end, but I just want to get an overview of where the story's going. I might chime in with a few more plot-related notes or new mechanical issues, but mostly I just want to get the gist of the rest of it.

>I will remain discrete//

discreet

>set a menu down discretely//

Same issue, and awful soon to repeat the word. You probably need to look up th difference between discrete and discreet.

Wow, you really glossed over dinner. I barely even noticed her ordering or eating, and she's already talking about getting dessert and paying. This is a pretty big missed opportunity to show them interacting. He probably doesn't understand a lot about food.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3547

>>3546
Chapter 2:
>Three-hundred-billion//
>hundred-thousand//
In numbers, hyphens only go between the tens and ones (and ten thousands and one thousands, and so on) place.

Well, this chapter certainly drags. Yes, we're getting a new viewpoint, but it's still telling us a bunch of information we already know. The only new thing is Bug's origin, but we didn't have to get it as a narration-only, after-the-fact summary. Those are really hard to pull off without getting terribly boring, and that's pretty much what happened here. His history could come out a little at a time as he converses with Rarity. Bite-sized chunks is often the way to play this. A huge block of exposition rarely works, because the reader has no reason yet to care about all this as much as you do.

>breaks//

brakes

Chapter 3:
>and…" I said, trailing off//
The ellipsis already means she trails off. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>dress and top that fitted me perfectly//

In that sense, the past tense is just "fit."

>the cost of a new mobile phone//

She doesn't have insurance on it? If not, might she be lamenting that?

>junk-food//

You'd only hyphenate that if you're using it as an adjective.

>discretely//

Discreetly again.

>looked positively loathe//

This is the verb form. The adjective is "loath."

>and saw dollar symbols almost literally appear in the woman's eyes//

You already pulled that with the guy in the cell phone store. It's repetitive.

Chapter 4:
This has a ton more of these "I sent" tags, and they're really unnecessary. Plus they look weird when they go back to regular font, but it's still right-justified, since that's not the part that's supposed to look like a text.

>right-happy//

No reason to have a hyphen there.

>And I have the best,//

Comma should be a period.

And now you are changing formats so the speech tags on the texts aren't in the same paragraph as the actual text. Neither one looks great, but this way probably makes more stylistic sense. You should be consistent, in any case.

>hold back,//

Another comma that should be a period.

>just send me a massage//

I can't tell if that's your error or Fluttershy's. I'm guessing yours, since nobody makes a joke about it.

>—NotABug, remember what I told you about touching in places? That goes for most of my—our body. Unless you really like Rainbow Dash, and I mean really really like, don't let her do anything unless you are sure you want it.—//

I guess I'm surprised at how little Rarity cares about this. Most people would consider someone else using their body for sexual purposes to be a serious invasion.

>want to,— I sent NotABug//

I'm going to stop marking these. It seems like it's only cropped up in this chapter, but maybe I missed some earlier ones. If you were using quotation marks, the comma would be correct, but since you want this to visually look like the actual text, you can bend the rules, but be consistent about it. Don't go with periods in the early chapters then switch to commas later.

>knight-in-shining-armor//

Don't hyphenate that.

Chapter ?:
Basically, I'm satisfied that I know all I need to about this story to render a verdict except one thing: how explicit the material will get that prompted you to put the [Sex] tag on this. So I'm going to ultra-skim the rest to find those bits and see if they're tame enough. So I won't be taking near as many notes, but I will if I happen to notice something.

You have a number of places where there are two blank lines between paragraphs.

You also should really look at how these text messages appear on screen, both on a computer and a mobile device. You'll find that some of them have line breaks in very inpportune places, like having only the final dash on the next line. It'd behoove you to add or take out a word here and there so it all looks nice.

Chapter 6:
>High School//
That shouldn't be capitalized.

>Given your activities,"—Fleur gestured at the portfolio—"I gather//

Drop that comma. You don't use one in this format.

Chapter 8:
>moxy//
British spelling? I've only ever seen "moxie."

>making me do go through this farce//

Jumbled wording.

>I'm not going to get anymore work from you, am I?//

"Anymore" and "any more" aren't the same thing. You need two worse, since an adverb wouldn't parse there.

>What's up, sis?//

Seems like you want Sweetie Belle to be as correct as Rarity in how she types. As a term of address, a family relation should be capitalized, since you're effectively using it as a name.

Chapter 9:
>comfortable teddy that NotABug seemed insistent on sleeping in. I couldn't blame her—it was comfortable//
So you're saying it's comfortable.

>"Comfortable enough to get some more. Time to add some things to my list.//

Ah, confirmed for comfortable. But you didn't close your quotation marks.

>dare not to accept me//

In this kind of phrasing, the "to" is implied. Leave it out.

>what,"—she gestured at what had become of the game machine—"is//

Drop the comma.

Chapter 10:
>out voted//
That should be one word.

>two-hundred-and-twenty//

None of those hyphens should be there.

>I wondered if she were awake or asleep//

Was. This isn't hypothetical.

Chapter 11:
>Rainbow's fingers explored the edges of my wings, gently running her fingers//
So... Rainbow's fingers were running her fingers?

>checking my email, checking//

Watch the close word repetition.

>—We're at the front door,//

You're missing the ending dash, and don't you normally put color behind these?

>she— This//

Em dashes shouldn't have space next to them on either side.

>Hiya Twilight!//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>looked stunned. She looked//

Close word repetition.

>If you think I'm going to let you feel sorry for yourself over something this inconsequential, you've got another thing coming//

It's "you've got another think coming."

>led them free//

That's a rather odd phrasing.

Chapter 12:
Okay, this is a real odd bird. The whole story's been about Rarity so far. It did spend a little time in Bug's perspective early on, but the bulk has been in Rarity's. And now after 100k words, you're going to introduce a new one? I mean... I can get why you want to use Windigo's viewpoint, but if you were going to, it would have been better to have little bits of it throughout the story. This isn't the kind of thing to spring on the reader now. I'm not going to make you change it, but this was a pretty bad idea, and there are ways of getting a lot of this chapter's info across while staying in Rarity/Bug's perspective.

Even with this kind of thing, I still see readers gush over bad decisions because they think it's cool to see part of the story through these other characters' eyes, but frankly, your average reader isn't too sophisticated about what they want from a story. I haven't actually looked at the comments to see if you got that kind of a reaction, but really, this is the first serious mistake I've seen you make. As long as you're going down that road, I hope you'll at least make it a little worthwhile, and that means inhabiting Windigo's viewpoint somewhat regularly from now on. If you have that major break in the story's structure only to abandon it immediately, that'd make things even worse, because then you've got a huge case of "one of these things is not like the others."

I really don't even see the value of utilizing Windigo's perspective anyway, unless you want to make him into a sympathetic character at some point. It just detracts from having this feel like Rarity's story.

To wit, the readership dropped significantly for this chapter.

Chapter 13:
You're falling into a trap the last few chapters where you start lots of sentences with participial elements. Authors of intermediate experience tend to do that, when they've learned to use such thing but not to do so in moderation. The problem is: they don't turn up a lot in normal conversation, so they stand out easily when repeated, like a fancy word. You won't notice "the" five times in a sentence, but you would notice two uses of "ventriloquist" on an entire page. These things are best used as seasoning, so don't let them overpower your story. FWIW, the author of Grendel put out a writing guide, and he considers participles a particularly weak way to start a sentence.

Another part of the issue is that you're doing this in the same places a lot, right at the beginnings of paragraphs. I'm going to paste in the first phrase from some consecutive paragraphs to illustrate, and I'll mark them with an asterisk if they are a participial element.

>Smiling at how NotABug had kept up her half of our deal*

>There was two new aspects (note you have a singular/plural mismatch here)
>Actually, flexible didn't even begin to cover it.
>Opting not to wrap my hair or tail*
>All my life I'd been a show-off.
>I'm turning into a pony monster
>I agreed with myself.
>Picking up the underwear*
>A mare's tail
>The barbaric option
>My mind derailed
>Leaning into the cups*
>Grabbing up the panties*
>No, no, no.
>I pinched the hem down
>Sitting upon my sewing seat*
>Rigging my sewing machine*
>The buttonhole foot had to go
>Taking out a seam ripper*
>Humming to myself*
See how it builds up? That started with one every third or fourth paragraph, which is already pushing it, but then you hit a stretch where the majority are. Couple that with other participial elements in the other parts of those paragraphs, and it's a structure you're abusing.

>"Phrasing," Rainbow Dash said.//

So she's Archer now?

>the two officers each wore the severe uniform of a police officer//

So the officers were wearing officers' uniforms? You don't say.

>There was plenty of things//

You keep using singular "was" to refer to plural objects.

So you put a pretty big disclaimer on this chapter, but if this is really as explicit as things get, you're nowhere near having a problem. Honestly, her odd focus on shapeshifting her genitals comes closer to the line than any of the sexual innuendo.

>The fashion was the give away.//

In that sense, "giveaway" is one word.

>on principal//

principle

>came free of the egg, both her little wings buzzed//

So these aren't going to be like show changelings who start out looking like grubs?

>Yes, mother.//

"Mother" would be capitalized as a term of address.

>between Rainbow and I//

between Rainbow and me

Chapter 14:
>wooshing//
Don't italicize sound effects like this. It's a valid word, so just leave it in normal font. Trying to get visually fancy with sound effects is a rather amateur thing, unless you're going for a children's story feel, which you clearly aren't.

>I'm sure you have more important things to do with your day than using psychological games on innocent women.//

That "using" should just be "use." It's a type of infinitive.

>NotABug looked around the room and her eyes fixated on our new mobile phone.//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>P.O. Box//

There's no reason to capitalize "box" here.

>Uma no Sushi//

I noticed this when you first used the name. Horse's sushi? Heh.

>Should we suggest it?//

I was going to save this until the end, but I'll go ahead and say that the weirdest thing about this story is how unsurprised everyone is. They just all regard Rarity as if she's barely outside the norm. She looks rather horselike by now and has a massive horn, and she's carrying around a daughter who looks very much like a horse, and people hardly even consider her a curiosity. That's some pretty hard suspension of disbelief to get over. And now she's the one suggesting Sweetie Belle combine with Byte? Her own sister, Rarity wouldn't have any idea what might happen, has no idea what the long-term implications are, has no idea if this is even a good thing, and she's going to tell Sweetie Belle to try it? And Bug is the one being the voice of reason? That's pretty hard to swallow.

>Making my way to the kitchen, I left my little family and set about making//

Watch the close repetition.

There's a parallel to good fiction structuring that you might think about using at the restaurant. It's that you shouldn't have a steady rising action to the climax. That's true in multiple ways. One, that there are lulls in what happens so it's not a monotonous climb. And two, that whatever conflict the story has doesn't just go linearly to its resolution. It's not interesting to read a story where everything works in the protagonist's favor and they have no real obstacles to success. So when everyone likes everything the chef makes them, it really saps the narrative of interest. There's no question in my mind that's how it will end up, because it's been that way on every visit to the restaurant so far. I might as well just skip over the scene, since I can already tell how it's going to end. You don't want me to be able to do that. And the chef said so himself, that he needed feedback to make good choices. That includes not liking something. By removing the possibility of failure, you've also removed the possibility of much interest.

Now step back to the story as a whole. Rarity had no real resistance to Bug joining her. They've had no trouble relating to her friends, maintaining their relationship, getting a love interest, having a child, setting up a business... What is there to keep me reading to find out if it'll work? I know it all will. There's no tension. The only slight source is Windigo, but he hasn't given them much trouble either. Bug didn't fare too well against him the first time, but Rarity easily dealt with his trap in the car. In well over 100k words, he's only made those two attempts on them. There's just a straight line from defining every conflict to seeing it resolved, and that's not an interesting way to drive a plot arc. Nobody has any setbacks. I like the story for the good characterizations and interactions, and that's a different way of generating interest, but the plot is honestly kind of dull. It's more a story about character growth, which can be a fine substitute for conflict, and that's what's keeping me interested in the story, but like I said, her character growth is just a constant stream of success, and it'd be a lot more engaging if you sprinkled in the occasional failure. Maybe keep that in mind going forward?

>do some work while NotABug does//

Watch the close repetition.

>Which, is something I should be working on now.//

No reason to have that comma.

Author's Note: who's Hando?

Chapter 15:
>if it were new//
was

>in future/

Missing a "the."

>cubical farm//

cubicle

>He walked around and bundle//

Verb forms don't match.

>half hour meeting//

Since you're using "half hour" as an adjective here, hyphenate it.

>'Bee//

There's not really a reason to use an apostrophe for a nickname.

Chapter 16:
>Everything about the transformation has been horribly mundane//
That should really be "had."

>clop//

Same deal as before with the italicized sound effects.

I have to say, this chapter is really dry. I see authors do this all the time: take a subject they know a lot about and show off, to the point it's pretty incomprehensible to someone without that knowledge. To a degree, understanding it isn't critical—I'm just supposed to get a general idea of what they're doing and accept them as experts, but it's still a lot of verbiage to plow through that doesn't mean anything to me. You might want to keep these exchanges less technical.

>dead-run//

No hyphen.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3573

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
You might find that readers are put off by mentions of feature dates, but that's up to you. You seem to have a typo in the dates, though, unless you managed to get featured before you published the story.

Short description:
>A lich, whose sole purpose is dealing with dead ponies for the royal princesses must now deal with something small, adorable, and alive.//
Needs another comma after "princesses."

Chapter 1:
>I may not be given another chance since once it’s complete; I believe she will be ready.//
That semicolon should be a comma.

>I begin at the Hospital//

Why is that capitalized?

So I see you've added a framing element to have the story be a journal. That's fine, but the issue is the whole thing needs to be plausibly written as one. Think about how people write journals. It's hours or even days after the events have happened. They wouldn't remember conversations well enough to write them out as quotations. They'd just be able to summarize what was said. So then when you do go on to include quoted dialogue, it doesn't feel authentic as a journal anymore. Summarizing is harder to keep interesting, though, which is why journal stories can be pretty hard to write well.

Anyway, there is a workaround. Just because he's writing a journal doesn't mean the entire text of the story has to be literally what's written in it. It could be flashback scenes informing what he did write. However, that does mean that he couldn't address the reader while in flashback mode, since he's going back to a time when he didn't have an audience. Having this frame doesn't necessarily give you carte blanche to break the fourth wall. It still has to make sense for how you're structuring the story.

Now there's another level you could take this to. It's a fairly simple one, though also kind of a lazy one. And that's if you have him explicitly say at the beginning, where he's introducing the journal, that he realizes he might not remember conversations word for word, but he's going to try to reconstruct them as best he can in order to make a narrative out of it. Or something to that effect. Basically, come up with a way to hand-wave the way he's writing it. That would also legitimize the occasional shifts he does into present tense.

>The filly in my lap coughed, softly..//

Extra period.

>She wouldn’t wake up, she looked so peaceful but nothing could bring her to open her eyes.//

Comma splice.

>Waiting in a hospital like every other helicopter parent except; this may be lethal.//

That's not a valid place to use a semicolon. You couldn't split it into two sentences there.

>Necronomicon//

Book titles should be in italics.

>I'm currently in a hospital with an earth pony foal laid across my lap//

This comes across as a little strange. Who's his audience again? It was recommended he write this down, but the filly is the only one he specifically mentioned as someone he was writing it for. So if he's essentially talking to her here, why would he refer to her so obliquely?

>Life Sapphire coughed again, and my attention drawn back to her, away from the staring eyes and dirty looks.//

The way that's phrased, the verb form needs to be "drew."

>The last one gave her a start, the expression on her face of surprise was unmistakable.//

Comma splice, and this is in an awkward order, versus "expression of surprise on her face."

>Something that only a month ago, I could have cared less for was now the most precious desire in the world.//

You don't need that comma, but if you want it, then it needs to be paired with another after "that."

>the mane of Life Sapphire//

These indirect possessions always sound awkward. What's the advantage of phrasing it this way over "Life Sapphire's mane"?

>slamming the door//

Why would the doctor do this? He may have an immediate distaste for Bone Daddy, but why disturb the filly and all the other patients around?

>ill--if that’s even possible for you—don't//

You're mixing real dashes and double hyphens. Dashes format better, but either one's acceptable, as long as you're consistent.

>I knew Sapphire would stay asleep through all this, so I didn’t worry much about his volume.//

Then why was he going to try quieting the doctor when he first entered?

>I held up a hoof, stopping him.//

He did this exact same action a few paragraphs back, and it didn't work. Why does it now?

Chapter 2:
>Earth pony//
You're inconsistent at whether you capitalize that. It really shouldn't be.

>out and once again Cold Hoof bolted out from the room and out//

That's very repetitive: three uses of "out" in only 13 words.

>“I do this job because no pony else will. Because no pony seems to want to.”//

Who's he talking to? Cold Hoof left.

>I with the flick of my horn, revealed a long since dead pegasus pony underneath//

You don't need that comma, but if you want it there, pair it with one after "I."

>The color of her irises were deep reds//

You have a number mismatch: color were.

>Passerbys//

Passersby

>His intentions weren’t hostile, he was checking to see if the badge would react with the proper magic.//

Comma splice.

>The symbols of night and day, the sun and the crescent moon, reflected outward in a holographic display and they knew know I was an agent of our rulers.//

Needs a comma after "display."

>I wonder, does Princess Celestia herself still do the color transformation process or does she have unicorn underlings for that and you royal guard types?//

Needs a comma before "or."

>she bolted onto her hooves//

It's early in the chapter yet, and it's already the third time a character has bolted.

>notice.Luckily//

Needs a space.

>between Celestia and myself//

That "myself" should be "me."

>Luna may have been the smaller of the two sisters//

Needs a comma after this.

>equestrian//

Capitalize this.

>built for the access to the throne//

That first "the" is extraneous, but this is all pretty self-explanatory anyway. Does it really need saying?

>I was escorted out//

Needs a comma after this.

>place somewhere along the pipeline. That hope was dashed, however, when Luna placed//

Watch the close repetition of "place."

>laboratory. ”//

Extraneous space.

>a murmur arouse//

I'm not sure whether you meant to use "arose" or "aroused."

>It slowly pressed outward in my direction//

Needs a comma after this.

>He raised a hoof and cut me off, “I//

>He took a long breath, “But//
You're using a non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>I wanted to scream at him//

>His logic was sound for now//
Needs a comma after this.

>over a century years ago//

Extraneous word.

Chapter 3:
>II can forgo the need for sustenance//
Typo.

>would have to received//

Typo.

>Earth Pony//

You keep flip-flopping on whether you capitalize that.

>The Doctor stops//

You've gone into present tense, and this isn't a situation where you'd capitalize "doctor." And wait, is this Doctor Horses? Bone Daddy was narrating his reminiscence, not speaking it, yet the doctor is responding to it? That doesn't make sense. If the doctor is breaking into the flashback, you might need to set that off as a separate scene, even if it's a really short one.

>I stared at the tiny creature as it lay there//

But he picked her up. She's not lying there anymore.

>the next 31 days and nights//

Write out a number that short.

>her firm hold onto it//

on

>simultaneously holding onto my hoof at the same time.//

Redundant.

>be,” I looked at both of her parents then at the clipboard that contained their names, I choose 1 name from each to form hers.//

There's no speaking action in that speech tag, the comma is a splice, and write out the number.

>mm....//

One dot too many.

>After taking one last bite of the carrot, she nodded to me.//

You have an extra line break before this.

>but again she shouldn’t give//

I don't think "shouldn't" is what you meant here.

>I looked confused//

He just said he was confused a couple paragraphs ago. But consider how he's phrased this. He can't see his own face. How does he know he looks confused?

>Then realized they might not have even told her, they were dead.//

Not told her what? Who her parents are? Kids sure seem to know that intrinsically. Why would she suddenly forget who she's used to living with?

>Perhaps I should, my thoughts were interrupted when my magic aura was broken.//

Perhaps he should what? I can't figure out what he means.

>house broken//

housebroken

>“Twenty-Nine days//

The "nine" shouldn't be capitalized. You also have a lot of extra blank lines between paragraphs through the end of the chapter.

>2 hours//

Spell out the number.

>has she been able speak//

Missing word.

>take, “Twenty-nine//

That shouldn't be capitalized, based on the way you formatted the speech tag.

>fixed me a somewhat curious look.//

fixed me with...

>I bite my nearly decayed away lip//

bit, decayed-away

>winnie//

whinny

Chapter 4:
>If she found me cutting a pony open//
Needs a comma after this.

>I tried to get away but found to no avail.//

Found what to no avail? That needs a noun or phrase to describe.

>I began to work on the seventh day//

That phrasing would be clearer if you got rid of the "to."

>Life Sapphire's burst into tears and give off that wheezing sound as she sobbed.//

The syntax is off in a couple ways. That shouldn't be a possessive, and the verb form of "give" isn't right.

>Unable to process bodies under such conditions, my frustration steadily built for several minutes.//

This says his frustration was unable to process bodies.

>She began to tear up//

But she'd already been crying, and you didn't have her stop.

>1000//

Write out the number.

>having to use her entire body to encompassed the ball//

Typo.

>Great, I was stuck doing this whether I desire to or not.//

I talked before about a fix to the framing device that might justify some of the tense switching, but only certain kinds of it. This is an example that still wouldn't work. The difference is whether what he's talking about would still be the case as of the time he wrote the journal, and this wouldn't.

>to cry anymore than in small bursts//

In this case, "any more" needs to be two words. There's a difference in meaning.

>My heart was beating rapidly inside, its protective safe miles away.//

You don't need that comma.

>care.” Doctor Horses reaffirmed//

You're using that as a speech tag, so the period should be a comma.

>I did notice now though she was growing much slowly//

This phrasing is all jumbled. I don't know what you meant to say.

Chapter 5:
>proper responses to major crisis//
Seems like you meant that to be plural, so crises.

>Looking down at her, my thoughts were shattered by the sight.//

This says his thoughts were looking down at her.

>I had kicked it nearly six times the length of my body. What was just a few hoofsteps for me must have felt like a football field to her.//

This is kind of repetitive with the earlier "The sprint to the ball must have felt like miles to Sapphire." But what's a few body lengths? A couple dozen yards? Didn't they walk to the park? That must have been significantly longer, unless he carried her, but he doesn't mention it.

>“You... want me to hit the ball back to you?” I asked.//

It's kind of odd this just now occurs to him, since he was about to kick it back to her earlier.

>tried to get through, as they tried get closer//

Missing word, but it's repetitive anyway.

>Even the burning sensation against my flesh, was overshadowed by the feeling it caused deep inside my core.//

No reason to have a comma there.

>How had this little foal, who can't even speak, touch me in ways that hundreds of ponies through the centuries couldn't?//

Typo. Let me remove part of the sentence to illustrate: "foal... touch"

>The need to bathe//

>I felt the need to draw in air//
Repetitive to have these so close together.

>The two foals looked two each other//

Typo. And this is repetitive with "they looked to me" a little later.

>given how awful I sounded when I laugh//

Missing a period after this.

>Why don’t you join us Life Sapphire?//

Missing a comma for direct address.

>blue furred-responsibility//

You've got the hyphen in the wrong part of this. It should go between the first two words.

>“Ponyville?” I questioned. “That’s a long way way to travel; five days to a week, isn't it?”//

That's probably pretty extreme. On a map, they're not that far apart. The show's inconsistent about it though. In one episode, it's a day-long train ride, and in another, it's a few hours' walk.

>It would give my little Alluring Flower and Sun Bandit will have somepony else to ride with.//

Phrasing is off.

>What she said made sense, and after I thought about it for a moment, placing a hoof against my lip.//

The way that's phrased, it sounds like there's supposed to be more to it, but it just cuts off.

>Ws//

Typo.

>“Genetic Disorders”//

A journal title wouldn't be in quotes. It would be italicized.

>section..//

Extra period.

>8 editions//

Write out the number.

>you tend to remember exactly were each section in each edition is//

Typo.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3574

>>3573
Chapter 6:
>I want to make sure the record of all the events are detailed out.//
You have a singular subject (record) with a plural verb (are). It doesn't matter that the plural "events" is located next to the verb. It isn't the subject.

>I wanted this to be smoother than last time and less, confrontational.//

There's no reason to have a comma there. They're not for dramatic pauses.

>at hoof length//

at hoof's length

>There was a stallion scrubbing hard at the floor, he looked up and glared at me.//

Comma splice.

>Necronomicon//

Book titles should be italicized.

>I looked at him and nervously smiled, “You//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag. You're also overusing "look." The previous paragraph had 2, and now there's another. This is a stretch of 5 paragraphs where you use it 8 times.

>it.” I suggested//

That sounds more like the speech tag, but the punctuation says the part before the quote is.

>burrowed his brow//

Typo.

>I looked at the escort around me and then at the doors, “I//

Another non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>I royal guards only growled at me//

Wrong word.

>No mercy for the formerly wicked I suppose.//

This is kind of a running theme in the story, yet you never justify it. What did he actually do that was evil? It's always so vague. I don't get a sense of how he's transformed over time if I don't know what he was like before. Work in a couple of examples somewhere.

>The doors opened and Celestia nearly spat out her tea, I looked at the royal crier who just looked back at me nervously.//

Comma splice. In fact, every sentence but the last one in this paragraph is a comma splice.

>I looked incredibly perplexed at her presence, shouldn't Cadence be in the Crystal Empire?//

Comma splice, and why would he be saying he looked perplexed instead of feeling that way? That's not how people experience emotion.

>her.” I managed to get out.//

That's a speech tag, but it's not punctuated as one.

>I managed to get out. I felt someone behind me and turned my head, Luna was standing there//

Comma splice.

>Celestia invited them in a way that you knew was an order without directly commanding a pony.//

That's pretty self-explanatory.

>I—“//

Dashes can sometimes make fancy-style quotation marks backward, as it has here. You can paste some in the right way.

>I was motioned off my a hoof wave//

Typo.

>horse shoe//

horseshoe

>Our initial reaction was to rescue the poor filly and bury you once again.//

Wait, what? He's been working for a very long time with Luna's approval, and he hasn't done anything wrong, and due to their clerical error they were actually considering punishing him for it? That's harsh. That should make him very angry. Plus it was actually Luna's idea to do so? And Celestia was the one to talk her out of it? Early in the story, it was precisely the other way around. Celestia didn't know about Bone Daddy, and Luna had to tell her he was okay. She defended him. Now she wanted to throw him away?

>stepped forward and looks//

Mixing tenses again.

>They consulted me and while we've put some debate into the decision and monitored your actions closely; it is one that even I reluctantly agreed to.//

That should be a comma, not a semicolon. The part before it is only a dependent clause.

>asking like harlets to me!//

Harlots, yet I don't understand the sentiment here. Partly, the phrasing is jumbled enough that I'm not sure what you were trying to say.

>Bone Daddy calm yourself.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>We are the rulers of Equestria and while we do not often directly interfere in everypony's life; we do know when something is wrong and when we have done something wrong.//

That's a spot for a comma, not a semicolon, and you need another comma after "Equestria."

>You have my sincere apologies//

Needs a comma here.

>Leaving you forgotten within the morgue.//

That's a sentence fragment, which can be acceptable in dialogue, but Luna's been speaking very formally, so it doesn't fit.

>She paused and shook her head, “I//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>you were simply a robotic servant to us.”//

She picks right up speaking again in the next paragraph, so the convention is to leave the closing quotation marks off this one.

>For you continue to do work for us, even with us paying you, is not near enough reward for your service.//

And yet she wanted to bury him? I must be missing something.

>Cadence sighed and looked at the two of them then shook her head, “I//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>However, Celestia pointed out that something drastic was required, I only agreed if they agreed to 24 hour monitoring.//

Comma splice, spell out the number.

>She paused and nodded, “I’ve//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>I’ve been watching you closely for the last two weeks, everything you’ve done and on two occasions nearly stepped in to remove her from your care.//

>Luna placed a hoof to her chest and then closed her eyes, her face looked heavy with remorse as she spoke//
Comma splices.

>My cup of rage wanted to boil over, I wanted to shout and rage to them the world over.//

Close repetition of "rage."

>Necromanic//

Necromantic

>The princesses braced themselves and I saw their horns flair.//

Needs a comma in there, and you've confused flair with flare.

>No this was just how I reacted when anger gripped me, I was about to attack yes but as a piece of my mind!//

Comma splice, and the phrasing here is unclear. He says he's not going to attack, and then that he is, and he only means a verbal attack, but that gets muddled.

>something feel from my robes.//

Typo.

>A child's drawing, rather well done for crayon of me.//

The "of me" should really go after "drawing."

>I was genuinely impressed and had realized now that if she could not speak; she must be drawing and learning to hoof sign.//

Misused semicolon.

>But that wasn't the important part, I checked my robes and discovered that within my notes pocket were dozens of pictures//

Comma splice.

>I needed, her.//

No reason for a comma there. If you want a dramatic pause, use an ellipsis.

>I could breath again//

breathe

>fidn//

Typo.

>The only right things here though, is that Life Sapphire has a new father and that you came to me in honesty today.//

Unnecessary comma, and you have plural "things" with singular "is."

>The princesses all gave nervous smiles, they liked that news but the foreboding of my mood indicated that they knew I was not finished with them.//

Comma splice, needs a comma before "but," and I don't follow the logic of the last part. How does his mood indicate what they know? That should be apparent from their behavior, not his.

>While my work my suffer//

Typo.

>took a sip of tea//

This is a common problem, and I don't really know why. When authors have a character enjoying a drink, they suddenly lose all imagination and don't have their characters do anything except some variation on "take a sip" over and over again. You've only mentioned her drink twice, but she was taking a sip both times. What other things do people do with their drinks? Think of what you do when you have tea.

>She offered a hoof towards me, I looked at it.//

Comma splice.

>Slowly I reached up and gave it a shake, “We//

>I nodded at her and then grimaced, “I//
Non-speaking actions used as speech tags.

The editing got noticeably worse in this chapter. That's not too surprising, since it's the first of the new chapters, but they're problems you'd corrected in the earlier ones, so I was hoping you'd learn from that. This one's chock full of comma splices and speech tags without speaking verbs, and it also has lots of typos of the kind you should be capable of finding on your own by reading back through your work. I see a few that people have pointed out in the comments as well, and you haven't addressed those. It took a long time to go over this one chapter, and I don't imagine the remaining two are going to be in any better shape. I can't spend the time to be your proofreader. If you need to find someone to help you edit the new chapters, then please do. The characters are fine, and the plot is mostly so (through the 6 chapters I read, at least), but the editing still needs quite a bit of work.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3594

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>My name is Lyra and I live and work in Ponyville//
Since there are separate clauses (that is, each verb gets its own subject: name is... and I live and work), you chould use a comma before the first "and."

>It's a wonderful job, I get to meet lots of different ponies from all walks of life.//

You have a comma splice here, which may fit the character voicing, but you don't really have the space to establish that much character voice in the synopsis, so it might be better to leave this kind of thing to the main story, or else it appears to be more author error.

Chapter 1:
>frost covered//
You're using that whole phrase as a single adjective, and what it describes comes after it, so hyphenate it.

>According to the wooden clock above me I wasn’t due to open for another fifteen minutes//

I don't get why she wouldn't know this already. She never looked at the time at her house? Doesn't she use an alarm clock? And her commute can't have any variability to it. I can't imagine how she wouldn't already have a good sense of what time it was.

>I didn’t need to rush though, I usually only started getting customers coming in around lunchtime.//

Comma splice. And if this is true, why open that early? It's not giving her much return on her time.

>my cutie mark; a golden lyre.//

Misused semicolon. You should be able to replace one with a period, but "a golden lyre" wouldn't constitute a complete sentence. You could use a colon here, since you'e defining/clarifying, or a dash, since this could be a change in the track of her thoughts, or a comma, since this could be an appositive.

>shutting out the frigid January morning air//

Participial phrases and absolute phrases are both wonderfully descriptive things, but authors of intermediate experience tend to fall in love with them and overuse them. This causes multiple problems.

First, they're not something you encounter much in everyday speech, so they're unusual. The more unusual something is, the more easily it sticks out when repeated, and you don't want your story sounding repetitive. For example, you wouldn't notice seeing "the" four times in a single sentence, but you'd definitley notice seeing "ventriloquist" twice on an entire page.

And in another type of repetition, it's not just that you're using these kinds of phrases at all. It's that you're also using them in the same places in your sentences. They overwhelmingly come at the end, so your sentences are structurally repetitive.

Using so many of them opens you up to several other kinds of things as well. They're supposed to describe something, but it's a common error to word your sentence so that the thing they describe doesn't appear, leaving them to seem to describe something else. If I see an example of that in the chapter, I'll copy it out to illustrate.

Another one is that participial phrases mean things happen at the same time, and authors often don't pay attention to that. They end up synchronizing actions that shouldn't be. I'll also point out an example of that if I see one.

So from just the first screenful of your story, here are all the participial elements I see:
>trying to keep my teeth from chattering//
>the sound of my hooves against the frost covered ground echoing around an otherwise empty street//
>held within a faint emerald glow//
>emblazoned at the top//
>squinting//
>attempting to use what little light was afforded to me//
>According to the wooden clock above me//
>shutting out the frigid January morning air//
>fumbling with the keys still within my magical grasp//
>Blinking out towards the crimson horizon beyond the glass door//
>brought through a lack of sleep//
>maneuvering them to flick every lightswitch inside the shop//
>illuminating my surroundings//
>containing songs for every instrument I sold and more//
It's also customary to set off participial phrases with a comma, which you don't always do. But look at the sheer number of those. You have 14 in just 16 sentences. This is overkill.

A related structure that authors latch onto is the "as" clause, which suffers from most of the same problems, and you use lots of those, too. Over these same 16 sentences, there are 5. You have two other uses of "as," but they're in a different sense. You have 72 uses of "as" in the chapter, and most of those will be for these clauses. Between this and the participials, you're really abusing such structures.

>A collection of shiny brass instruments sparkled within a glass case against one wall, other instruments were either laid out on small tables to be played, or hung delicately from ornate stands.//

Comma splice.

>I entered the building slowly, squinting as I turned to glance upwards//

This is one I already marked, but I pulled it out again as an example of unintentional sychronization. She probably wouldn't try to look at the clock until after she'd entered, but this says she does them at the same time.

>I hate mornings, I’ve never really been a morning pony.//

Comma splice. These can be used to good effect in creating a character voice, but 1) they're best held for when you want to show the character is feeling rushed, confused, emotional, etc. Using lots of them in normal situations defeats the effect. And 2) I don't believe you're doing this intentionally.

>A brighter cyan glow surrounded me as I pulsed energy through my horn and sent out a series of sparks through the air, maneuvering them to flick every lightswitch inside the shop and illuminating my surroundings.//

This is all a synchronization issue with participles, too. You're having a sequence of cause-and-effect actions all happen at once.

>A collection of shiny brass instruments sparkled within a glass case against one wall, other instruments were either laid out on small tables to be played//

Comma splice. Suffice it to say you have a lot of these. I'm not going to keep marking them.

>shuffling hooves barely audible against the soft carpet below. Carefully, I shuffled//

Like I alluded to before, watch repeating words in a close space like this.

>So long little buddy//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>elevated a fresh one from within//

You're really purpling this up. That's kind of a taste issue, but there's something to be said for simplicity. Elevated? Exhausted glass dome? Defunct lamp? If you had an omniscient narrator, you could more easily get away with this. But you have a first-person narration. That means that the narration is her stream of thought. Who monologues in their head with such fancy language? If you set her up as a really intellectual type, fair enough. You do have her actual dialogue as pretty fancy, but she doesn't speak like this in canon, so why would she in her own head? Some fancy words would do fine, especially for creating vivid imagery, but when it's just needlessly choosing more complex synonyms, what is it accomplishing for the story? The idea for choosing fancy words is that a simpler one wouldn't quite do.

>I approached the counter and the newly delivered box//

You just called it a "newly delivered box" a few paragraphs ago.

>before placing the papers onto the countertop and began//

These verb forms don't match, but what you need to do to fix that depends on how you want the sentence structured. If you want the last verb to be another participle (boo!) it needs to be "beginning." If you want it to branch from "I" as a parallel verb to "opened," then you need a comma after "countertop" to show the participle (boo!) ends there.

>began to unpack//

>began unpacking//
Repetitive.

>at a moments notice//

at a moment's notice

>five, prepared and neatly bound stacks//

I don't understand what that comma is doing there. Partly because I'm not sure what "prepared" means in this contex, but mostly because "five" and "prepared" would be hierarchical adjectives—they'd sound really awkward if you swapped the order—so they don't take a comma.

>One-hundred//

That's not a part of a number yo'd hyphenate, and why is it capitalized?

>the cellist//

It's also odd that you keep using these kinds of descriptors. Again, the reader is to take the narration as Lyra's thought process. She knows Derpy and Octavia well. Why would she, in her own head, refer to friends and acquaintances in such an external and impersonal way? You don't think of your grandfather as "the gray-haired man," do you? You'd just mentally refer to him by name or pronoun mostly.

>taking it in her mouth delicately and placing it in her bag before re-clasping it shut and began//

This looks like that earlier instance. I believe you're missing commas in both, since I can see more clearly how you want this one structured.

>See you later,” and turned my attention back down to the parchment before me//

You've capitalized/punctuated that as if it's a speech tag, but it isn't.

>Th-Thank//

Unless it's something like a name that has to be capitalized anyway, only capitalized the first instance of a word that begins a sentence with a stutter.

>allowing the door to gently close behind her. I allowed//

Close word repetition.

>Once she had disappeared completely out of sight, I turned my attention to the mare who had come in.//

So she has a new customer, but she's going to waste time watching Octavia leave? Why?

>“I-I…” she began, stammering//

You already showed me the stammering in her dialogue, so narrating it as well is redundant.

>stave next to the pre-printed treble and bass clefs, and began to jot down notes onto the stave//

Close repetition again, and a single one is just generally called a staff.

>N-No//

Only capitalize the first one.

>The ringing of the bell above the door slowly fading into silence.//

You probably meant to use "faded" there. While sentence fragments can be used by authorial discretion, participial elements make for poor ones, since they're supposed to be descriptive, but there's nothing for them to describe.

>kept invading my mind, and I kept//

Close word repetition.

>I didn’t mind though, The//

Capitalization.

>last minute customers//

Same as earlier, "last-minute" should be hyphenated here.

>began to whirr and a long piece of paper began//

Besides just being repetitive to use these so close together, "begin" and "start" actions are also something many authors overuse. It's a given that any action would begin, so for the most part, it's only worth pointing out that beginning when it's noteworthy for some reason, like it's abrupt or you want to emphasize that the action never finished. You have 10 forms of "start" and 25 of "begin" in the chapter, which is a lot for this word count.

>Turning on the light, I eyed up the hastily stacked piles of boxes from earlier, groaning aloud.//

I'd refrained from pointing out synchronization issues for the most part, but this is an egregious one. You have her doing all three of these actions simultaneously, and it doesn't make sense for her to. There's no path of light on -> realize she still has work to do -> groan.

However, really consider this paragraph. It's symptomatic of a lot of this chapter. There's a whole lot of needless detail. Her interaction with Octavia was the same. Nothing came of it. She did seem to note Octavia wasn't acting right and speculated on why, but neither one of them attempted to discuss it, and Lyra only mentioned it as a factual thing without expressing her feelings about it. On the other hand, Lyra's repeated tries to work on her music while getting interrupted were good, because that characterizes her well. But this paragraph... maybe half of it is interesting. All the details of her adding up the receipts and refilling the till are presented so emotionlessly. If there's something thematic or symbolic about it fine, but if you're just trying to fill up the page with words, this isn't the way to do it. Make all this detail matter in some way, or get rid of it.

>the days earnings//

the day's earnings

>There was only about twelve bars//

You have a singular verb with a plural subject.

>H-Hello//

Only capitalize the first.

>a nervous twinge to my voice//

This is another subtle perspective issue many authors have. If you're nervous, how do you experience it? More likely through your thoughts and physical sensations. Probably not through how you sound. If you sound that way, you're already nervous, and you'd already know that. You don't need to interpret the sound to key you into understanding how you feel.

>Wh-Who’s//

Only capitalize the first.

>I should have run already, I thought.//

The narration's already understood to be her thought. You don't need to say so.

>had ran//

had run

>I thought, dropping my leg back down onto the snow and looked ahead to where the pony had ran, seeing a trail of hoofprints under the next streetlight in the distance.//

Another missing comma that jumbles the meaning, but this is a case where it can be unclear what the participle describes. "Seeing" is so far from "I" that it creates a sense it more likely describes "the pony."

>Why are ponies running away from me today?//

You should still phrase this in past tense.

>As I waited for my coat to dry I felt myself beginning to shiver again.//

Well, this just emphasizes a question I was going to ask earlier. Why would she try warming herself with a shower when it'd just make her feel cold afterward. If she needed to get clean, too, then she'd have an additional motivation to take the shower, but if she only wanted to get warm, bundling up in a blanket and getting the fireplace going would be more effective.

>half finished bars//

half-finished

>eek//

eke

>Turning my eyes away from the fire, my gaze returned to the pages of sheet music in front of me.//

Ah, I finally caught you doing one of these. The last participle I marked was a misplaced modifier, where it seems to describe something closer to it in the sentence than the intended target. In this case, the intended target isn't even in the sentence. This explicitly says her gaze turned her eyes away from the fire, not that she did.

So that seems like I've said a lot, but consider that I wouldn't have spent a couple hours in your story if I didn't think it was worth the investment.

The overall idea for the story seems fine, but make sure you keep a strong thematic line going through it, whatever you want that to be: writing her music, developing a relationship with Bon Bon, finding her place in town, all of the above. Whatever. But keep that floating along through everything so the reader sees it as a common thread. In some of the areas of pointless detail I noted, it felt like the story had no direction. Keep a motive force behind what's happening, and don't get bogged down in irrelevant material.

Aside from that, it should be clear what the pervasive writing issues were: comma splices and repetition, plus it'd help if you'd develop a consistent voicing for Lyra in how fancy she talks/thinks (and perhaps connect the dots as to why your version of her does when the canon one doesn't).

This is a good effort for your first story on the site, and I think you're capable of getting it fixed up to where I'd be happy to post it.
This post was edited by its author on .

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3601

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Synopsis:
>tourists who comes//
Mixing singular with plural there.

Chapter 1:
>slid his pencil into the spiral binding along the top of his notebook, and placed both into his saddlebags//
So he has these combined into a single item, but then he manages to place them in multiple saddlebags?

>there was still had one more stop//

Jumbled wording.

>He had been sitting in the soot and cinders//

Very repetitive with the earlier:
>the soot and loose cinders blowing around on the breeze//

>Despite the obvious abundance that surrounded him//

You just used "surrounded" in the previous sentence.

>There were an abundance//

"Abundance" is just a singular term, but you're using it with a plural verb.

>and while she didn’t usually have time to meet with ponies for very long//

Needs a comma after this to set off the dependent clause.

>…no,” he stopped.//

Leave a space after the ellipsis, and you're trying to use that narrative action as a speech tag, even though it has no speaking verb.

>then …//

Don't leave a space in front of the ellipsis.

>was….//

That should just be three dots.

>Well, didn’t that just bite the bark.//

Not sure whether you need one more or one fewer line break here, but it's not right as is.

>Everfree forest//

"Forest" is part of the name and should be capitalized as well.

>jail in Everfree forest//

Same thing, and missing a "the."

>“Why does everypony believe that I’m going to imprison them in the place I banish them to?” she asked herself.//

You have another spot here where the line break pattern doesn't work.

>took a moment to take//

Repetitive word choice. Instead of "take an appraisal," why not just "appraise"? What would you lose?

>She gave him an annoyed look.//

Messed-up line break again. You'd catch these if you'd just take a minute to scroll through your story.

>it’s … uh … um …//

You're inconsistent in how you're spacing your ellipses.

>“It’s a bit hard to explain.//

Another bad line break.

>problems. You should have seen some of the problems Luna and I cause//

Close repetition of "problems," and why is "cause" in present tense?

>but I’m afraid I can’t just let you go; at least not yet//

Misused semicolon. The part after it couldn't stand as an independent sentence.

>It’s a bit drafty in the winter//

Needs a comma here to go between the clauses.

>bit…much//

Inconsistent ellipsis spacing. I can't keep marking these. You need to scan for them.

>I should have revoked it many years ago//

I still say "revoked" is a poor word choice here for several reasons. One, it's not the typical word used for a law, and two, it implies she's the one who came up with the law. Why would she?

>Repeatedly.//

Another bad line break.

>true.” Celestia replied//

Punctuation.

>Only a Princess can raise or lower a celestial body.//

By herself yes, but the unicorn tribe could do it collectively.

>doesn’t.” she offered//

Punctuation, and this is the same speaking verb you just used a paragraph ago. There are lots of little things like this cropping up that just show you aren't paying attention. If you go back through your own work with any care, you should be spotting a lot of these.

Chapter 2:
What I normally do for really long stories like this is just read the first chapter in detail to get a feel for what its editing needs might be. If it looks in reasonably good shape on that front, I'll skim the rest to see how the characterization and plot go. So the problems I marked above are likely to persist throughout and should be scanned for, but I'm only going to mark new issues, and only the first instance I see of each.

>errors — which would only disturb Twilight — she//

Don't put spaces around em dashes.

>find--”//

If you're willing to type actual dashes, then don't use double hyphens.

>Let’s recap a little bit then//

This is a really good way to bore readers. How much of this is actually necessary? I bet I could understand the story fine without any of it. Celestia goes on an unbroken monologue for 6 paragraphs.

>before taking another sip of tea//

This is a common problem, and I struggle to understand why. Authors lose all imagination when they have a character enjoy a drink, and all they can think to have the character do is repeatedly "take another sip." The last 3 times she's done something with her tea, it was to take a sip. Show some imagination. When you have a drink, what are some other things you do with it than sip it? Especially a drink like tea, that takes some additional steps to get it how you like it? There are lots of things. Scoop in some sugar, swirl it, smell it, look into it, etc.

>“No, it doesn’t.”//

Oh good. More monologue. This one lasts another 6 paragraphs.

>in the early years, she was one of the greatest allies I had in the first few years//

Repetitive phrasing.

>it’s….//

Only use three dots.

>Everypony sees me under a different light, Mister Bean.//

Why does she keep using direct address with him? It's making the conversation feel very artificial. When you're talking one on one with someone, how often do you actually do this?

>as he took a sip of tea//

It's like I'm psychic or something...

Chapter 3:
>She had been kind during the walk, and was even kinder in her explanations of the history behind the baubles and trinkets that now rested on plush velvets and marble pillars.//
See, you're leaving a lot of this generic. If you want the reader to buy into them having a genuine developing friendship, you can't be vague about it. Give me a couple of examples of these. I can see how it might be too slow-paced to actually include all this as it happens, but give me a little taste, at least. What were a couple of these baubles? How was she kind? How did it make him feel? What little mannerisms of hers did he notice that he found endearing? That sort of thing.

And the direct address continues. Celestia and Discord keep calling each other by name. It's not as if it's in doubt to whom they're speaking, which would be the main purpose of doing that. The other is to add emphasis, and they're not doing that, either. At least they shouldn't be, not this much, or emphasis loses all meaning.

>“Imbecile,” He grumbled.//

Capitalization.

>Almost like she wanted to be just Celestia.//

You have an extra line break here.

>for awhile//

"Awhile" and "a while" aren't the same thing. The former is an adverb, and the latter is a noun. You need a noun here to serve as the object of the preposition "for."

>This is a fair description of the train station//

>This does give a fair representation of it.//
She's said the same thing twice.

>Woah//

I also fail to understand why so many writers make this spelling error.

>“Thank you.”//

Another spot with an extra line break.

>protegé//

She's female, so protegée.

Now that I'm looking at the view counts by chapter, you do have a pretty significant drop-off. I wouldn't be surprised if it's from all the expository monologuing in chapter 2.

Chapter 4:
>N-n-nightmare//
In this case, it's a proper noun he's stuttering on, so you need to capitalize it every time he restarts it.

And now Luna's using way too much direct address.

Chapter 5:
>equish//
Languages should be capitalized.

>He didn’t want to offend her by criticizing her cooking, there was a vacancy on the moon, after all.//

That first comma is a splice.

>You tried to incinerate him, sister.//

When you use a family relation the same way you'd use a name, it should be capitalized. Direct address is one such case.

>Baked Bean’s official response to the offer was to choke on a blueberry eyeball.//

Another spot with one too many line beaks. If you'd just quickly scroll through the chapters, you'd easily spot these.

>visit Canterlot without visiting//

I hope he'd be attentive to repetition like this.

>progressing faster now --//

Please be consistent about using proper dashes.

>He trotted quickly to the Palace//

Why is "palace" capitalized here? It's just a general term. It's not the actual name of the place.

You're inconsistent about how you space your ellipses.

>“Sego Lily.” Bean quietly interrupted.//

Punctuation.

Chapter 6:
>Good morning Mister Bean!//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>“I wanted to apologize to you.” Bean finished after a moment.//

>“I see.” Bean quietly replied.//
>“Oh, heh. Wow.” Spike replied, with a bit of embarrassed pride.//
Punctuation. I don't know why you keep intermittently making this mistake. I'm certainly not catching all the instances of it.

>Bean looked crushed for a moment//

You're in his perspective. How does h know how he looks? He can't see himself. And that's not how people judge their own moods anyway. You don't have to look in a mirror to know you're happy.

>Wouldyouexcusemeforonemoment?//

Authors like to do this, but it works precisely opposite the effect they're trying to create. It's supposed to look like he's speaking fast, bt it actually takes longer to read, so it slows the reader down. If you want to communicate that he said it rapidly, then narrate that he did.

>Luna had never been able to say no to Puppy Dog eyes.//

Perspective again. How would Bean know this?

>Twilight looked like she might try to hem or haw for a moment, but then she sighed.//

You've started a new paragraph after this without inserting a blank line.

>He still looked thoughtful.//

Now you've gone to Celestia's viewpoint for some reason.

>“What have you done?” She whispered.//

Well, this time it's a capitalization problem.

>I have been married to another already.//

I hope there will be an explanation forthcoming as to how he doesn't have to marry Luna now. You never said anything about the law that pertains to this.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3602

>>3601
You're just going to make readers take him less seriously. Interesting that you used to have a joke to that effect in here. Because you're not playing that for humor. You're earnest in having him be the best at many things, and all the canon characters take an instant liking to him.

>unique - if not a little back-breaking - style//

Use proper dashes.

>Bean felt like the fun had been doubled//

Yes, memes were just what this story needed.

>“Potato, potahto.” She replied//

Punctuation/capitalization.

>swayed and swooned//

Huh? Neither one of them is swooning.

>‘Self, I wish I had just left well enough alone and remained a unicorn?//

You never closed that quote.

>question: Did you ever want to be a commoner, provided everything else in the kingdom was taken care of?//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>“Did I ever want to step away,” She offered.//

Capitalization.

Chapter 19:
>rocks - which looked very much like enlarged version of those little hot stones Bean had seen used in massage therapy - lined//
Use proper dashes.

>thine magic//

Thy. Only use "thine" where you'd normally use "yours" or when the next word starts with a vowel.

>he doth be//

He is. If you modernize this, it'd say "than he does be." That's just weird. If you're going to use archaic language, study up on it so you can get it right.

>Thou art speaking truly, sister?//

Capitalization. And, incidentally, sisters would be familiar enough to use "you."

>little toy,” Celestia remarked while Bean sat down on the bench next to her. “I like his little//

Close word repetition again.

>It bobbed along//

You just described Bean as bobbing, and now the duck is doing it too.

>‘bout//

Another backward apostrophe.

>for - and of - my//

Use dashes.

>built in bench//

built-in

>But, you look//

No comma.

>moments - several moments, in fact - when//

Use dashes.

Chapter 20:
You use "replied" 18 times in the chapter, which doesn't seem like a lot, but the get a bit clustered in places, where I find 3 or 4 on a single screen.

>“Bean, are you okay? You seem awfully quiet,” Celestia asked.//

You're applying "asked" to the whole quote, but only the first part is a question.

>Kindergarten//

Why is that capitalized?

>(*) Except for the guppies. Don’t ask about the guppies.//

This doesn't work with whatever perspective you're using. This kind of gimmick requires an omniscient narrator or one explicitly relating the story to an audience after the events took place. You don't have either one of those situations.

>can …” Bean trailed off//

Redundant.

>She - my mom, that is - had//

Use dashes.

>Then until you can provide such//

Needs a comma after this to separate the dependent clause.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3603

>>3601
>>3602
Chapter 21:
This would do far better as a side story. As it is, it's just irrelevant fluff jammed in the middle of the story, and it drags the whole thing down. It even spends most of its time recapping things the reader already knows. Plus it has an unqualified shipping pair that doesn't come to a conclusion, and... yeah. This really should be a side story.

Chapter 22:
>her way too the shower//
Typo.

>unholy-yet-pleasantly-plush//

You hyphenated that descriptive phrase right, but not this one:
>wet towel induced//

>Let me see..//

One dot too few or too many.

>this then lead to her slowly turning her head//

The past tense is "led."

>your Highness//

Capitalization.

>Woah//

Spelling.

>your majesties//

Why is Wysteria calling them this? She'd been using "Your Highness" all along, which is the proper address for a prince or princess. This one is for a king or queen. Then you have Silver Tongue use it later.

Chapter 23:
>“Well,” he drew in a long breath, “despite//
That's not a speaking action.

>Tweed//

Why is this capitalized?

>four year old//

As you've used it, this needs to be hyphenated.

>the penalty was fifty years on the racks, sister//

Capitalization.

>Celestia replied in an annoyed voice//

She's your perspective character in this scene, yet this is a very external evaluation of how she sounds. People don't tend to make observations about the overall effect of their own voices like this.

>he hesitated//

By itself, this is pretty uninformative. The fact that he hesitated doesn't mean much. What happens during the hesitation does, so why don't you show me that?

>And yet,//

No comma.

>Hear hear//

That does take a comma.

Chapter 24:
>said, and she said//
Close repetition.

>wife—” her lips snuck in closer to his, “—you//

Hey, you almost got it right that time. But you shouldn't have that comma.

>your Majesties//

Capitalization, Highnesses.

>The Princess was laying on her stomach//

Since Celestia relentlessly hounds him about grammar, I'm going to do the same, where this book is concerned. This should be "lying," and as it's a common error to mix those verbs up, she should take great delight in harassing him about it.

>wait....//

One dot too many.

>is — maybe//

Shorter en dashes use spaces around them, but these longer em dashes shouldn't.

>Barracks//

Why is that capitalized?

>he didn’t want to leave a brother hanging but he wasn’t sure what the appropriate answer should be//

Needs a comma between the clauses.

>she tittered//

Every time you start a new scene, consider that all the pronoun antecedents are reset. Call characters by name again before using a pronoun for them. In this scene, thre are apparently 3 characters present, but only Bean has been named. I presume the other two are Shining and Cadence, but I have to look ahead to see that.

Well, no, it turns out it's just Bean and Celestia. Case in point, then. This was confusing.

>Celestia chuckled in a kind and amused way.//

She's your perspective character here. It's a strange self-assessment for her to make.

>Secretary//

Why is this capitalized?

Chapter 25:
>Lead on my prince//
Without a comma for direct address, she's telling him to lead her prince somewhere.

>naught but//

Well, there's a piece of very fake-sounding dialogue for him. I'd say he was putting on airs to be funny, but nobody reacts to it as if it's a joke. It just sounds really unnatural, and not in keeping with the character voice you've developed for him.

Why do you keep italicizing restaurant names? The only need to be capitalized. Sometimes italics are used for foreign words, so I guess I could see that for these particular names, but it's not required.

>the waiter’s use of the Royal We//

How does he know that's what the waiter's doing? To me, it just sounds like he's speaking on behalf of the entire staff.

>“Now,” Twice Baked smiled broadly.//

You're using that as a speech tag, but it isn't. How do you smile a sentence?

>“I utterly refuse to have another drop.” Celestia simply announced.//

I just don't get this. You have it right a lot of the time, but you'll go for stretches where it's consistently wrong as well.

>High Hinny Hey!//

A song title would go in quotation marks.

>“Hungry, sister?”//

Capitalization.

>challenged//

>admonished//
You have to be careful with some of these speaking verbs. Both of these are transitive, which is fine—speaking verbs are supposed to take the dialogue as their direct objects. However, in both of these cases, that doesn't make sense. The direct objects of these would be the person being challenged or admonished, not the speech that does so.

>“I would like to visit them sometime,” Luna smiled a bit more.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag again.

>macarana//

What are these? A brief google search doesn't turn up anything. Are you sure you didn't mean macadamia?

>But yet//

Redundant.

>Oh, very modest Miss ‘I Am The End Of Your Searching.’//

Needs a comma for direct address.

Chapter 26:
Do you have a broken italics tag at the beginning? I don't see any rhyme or reason to why it's all in italics there or why it stops where it does.

>your Most Serene Highnesses//

"Your" should be capitalized too.

>They also send their thanks again for your forgiveness.//

You have 3 sentences in a row with an "also" up front. It's repetitive.

>2 percent, injuries were down 12 percent, and that a change of armor wax vendors would save over six thousand//

You're going to spell out six thousand but not two or twelve? Yeah, all those numbers are short enough to use the words.

>“All right,” Bean shrugged//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

You're using "replied" a lot again in this chapter.

>to-//

Use a dash.

>“Do I have any in-laws?”//

Wouldn't the pertinent question be whether she has any more? She already knows about Bean's immediate family, and those are in-laws.

>Woah//

Please, please, please spell this right.

Chapter 27:
>Before she could, however//
You wedge that "however" in the same place to start consecutive paragraphs. It's repetitive.

>No, stop that Celly.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>“Shall we?”//

Line break is off here.

>in worry. “Oh. I’m just worried//

So he's worried, is what I'm getting from this.

>ze impression that zis was a casual meeting. I was unaware that there//

You're pretty inconsistent at applying his accent.

>What had done this time?//

Missing word.

Chapter 28:
>longsuffering//
long-suffering

>“And are you completely sure there is no way to turn down the temperature on that thing?”//

Wouldn't there be a reciprocal effect from the moon? For the thousand years Celestia had to raise it, did it freeze her? Luna raises the stars as well, and they'd be hot, if distant.

>Thank you for raising it, sister.//

Capitalization.

Once again, we get a lot of "replied"s and "offered"s in this chapter.

>Miss me?” The mismatched master of mayhem//

Capitalization, and keep your perspective in mind. Bean's the one choosing to call him that, which is kind of weird.

>mon Capitaine//

I don't see a reason to capitalize that. French doesn't do so for nouns in general.

>Luna isn't here yet.”//

Inadvertent line break there.

>It’s a unicorn by the name of Starlight Glimmer. She wants to start a new town out near the edge of the Badlands.//

But her town isn't in the Badlands. it's not even close.

>“I...well…” he stammered.//

Same verb you used last time he spoke.

>began playing from nowhere as spotlights began//

Watch the close word repetition, and avoid using "start" and "begin" actions that much anyway. It's obvious that any action begins. It's only worth pointing it out when the beginning is significant for some reason.

>Citron Préssé//

You didn't capitalize that when the incident happened, and you had another accent mark on it.

Chapter 29:
>“Oh, stop that you two,”//
Needs a comma for direct address.

>Feather Flu//

Why would that be capitalized?

>mine throat//

>mine troops//
>mine sister//
my

>thou are//

art

>mine appetite//

Hey, you actually got that one right.

>Thine princess//

thy

>Thou are//

art

>mine needs//

my

Seriously, learn to write this archaic usage. Suffice it to say I haven't even marked half the problems with it. Luna's also not likely to use "thou" with her husband and daughter.

It's a pretty bad idea to have italics go on for this long. It's like reading all caps. It quickly gets irritating.

Chapter 30:
>With him performing some occasional surveillance on Miss Glimmer//
Except... he doesn't do this. Nobody outside of town was aware of what was going on there, least of all the royals or the elements.

>But, if I hadn’t booped Celestia’s nose//

Move that comma to the end of this excerpt.

>My Dear//

Why is "dear" capitalized?

Chapter 31:
>There’s a few crazy ponies//
There are

>Woah//

/me openly weeps

>wife - if he never allowed anything to tear what had just been woven between them - then//

Use dashes.

>“Woah,” was the best word Bean could come up with to describe the situation. “This is...just...Woah.”//

why must you torture me

Bonus chapter:
>I don’t know, love//
For many chapters, you'd been capitalizing "Love" in this usage.

And the "replied"s and "offered"s are making an abundant holiday appearance, I see.

>Woah!//

I suppose the ghastliness of that spelling does fit the occasion.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3620

Chapter 1:
You're using the long em dashes, which shouldn't have space on either side.

>Scattered about where the occasional lantern or lamp//

Typo.

>as perforated limbs gently flexed as they absorbed the landing impact//

It's pretty clunky to have multiple "as" clauses in the same sentence anyway, but particularly when they're jammed together like this. They both mean that things are happening at the same time, so you're over-specifying that.

>Six pair of light blue//

This sentence rambles on so long that it's not clear what its focus is supposed to be, plus it's got several awkward phrasings.

>stand fast everyling.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>as a mob of mostly-armored guards erupted from within, a glowing alicorn leading the charge, her wings spread wide as she half-flew, half-galloped.//

Another spot of multiple "as" clauses in one sentence.

>Hooves thundered//

Did you miss putting an [hr] here? Or sis you intend this to be a soft scene break?

>as she struggled with conflicting emotions, as her guards fanned out//

"As" clauses again. I can't keep marking all these. You ought to just scan through for them yourself.

>The single, standing changeling//

You shouldn't have a comma there. It's a down-in-the-weeds explanation, but if two adjectives would sound really awkward in reverse order, don't use a comma. Otherwise, do.

>Motioning to the white flag//

Set off participial phrases with a comma.

>The hallways echoed with the clip-clop of multiple bare hooves, and the metallic ringing of shod ones; familiar sounds indeed.//

Don't use a semicolon unless it's a list separator or what's on either side of it could stand as a complete sentence. A comma or dash would do fine here.

>“Quiet!” she called out; well, yelled, to be accurate, which startled both her friends and her guards.//

Another semicolon that doesn't quite work.

>“Sheesh Twilight,” Rainbow grumbled, “You don’t hafta yell, yanno!”//

Needs a comma for direct address, and the way you went out of the quote and back in with commas means you intend both parts of the quote to be a single sentence, yet you capitalized "you" in the middle of it.

>whut’s the deal Twi//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>“Except that they seem to be ambassadors of some sort; from somewhere called “Refugee Hive”. At least that’s all I know for now.”//

Misused semicolon again, and when you have a quote inside another quote, use single quotation marks for the inner one.

>Sure they are!” she mockingly winked.//

As lower case, that's a speech tag, but it has no speaking action. How do you wink a sentence?

>as impartially, as objectively, as she possibly could//

That's an awkward phrasing. The repetition of "as" would seem to be for effect, except the third one is meant in a different sense.

>The changelings never moved, simply remained standing there.//

That just says the same thing twice.

>between myself, and Refugee Hive; correct?//

That comma shouldn't be there, the semicolon should be a comma, and "myself" should be "me."

>We have been——“//

>Queen——“//
Why are you using 2 em dashes? And note that they've made your closing quotation marks backward.

>in interruption//

The fact that the speech got cut off with a dash already means it was an interruption. Narrating it as well is redundant.

>As if there had been no interruption, “We//

Another apparent speech tag that has no speaking verb.

>“Queen??”//

One question mark is plenty.

>in surprise and consternation//

Any time you use an in/with/of emotion phrasing, you probably need to be showing how the character demonstrates that emotion instead of stating it outright.

>peaceful, mutually accommodating, relationship//

That second comma shouldn't be there.

>Ignoring Rainbow’s derisive snort//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma.

>spokeslink//

Typo.

>She is hopeful that Her Hive may be peacefully integrated into Your Kingdom; if not as an allied nation, then as citizens.//

Misused semicolon.

>thet//

Is this supposed to imitate a pronunciation? Because AJ doesn't say it like this. She doesn't pronounce it different than anyone else. Don't overdo her accent. Readers know what she sounds like.

>Simmer down Sally//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>‘bout//

Smart quotes always get leading apostrophes backward, because they think you want a single opening quote. You can paste one in the right way.

>The outraged pegasus was about to argue that when she paused, considering with whom she was speaking: Applejack, the Representation of Honesty.//

This scene had been in Twilight's perspective, but this sure sounds like it's from Dash's.

>winds,” the spokesling continued. “with//

The period and the lower-case "with" don't work. You either need the period to be a comma, or "with" needs to be capitalized.

>—She no longer knows us—//

That shouldn't be capitalized.

>C’mon Twilight//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>cut though the clangor//

You just used "clangor" in the previous paragraph. When you use a word that unusual, it stands out very easily when you use it again too soon. These are close together enough to be repetitive.

>“Invade you,” was repeated. “An interesting word choice,” was contemptuously declared.//

That's awfully strange to have the speaking action be passive when the speaker has been identified.

>it was clearly contemptuous in its tone//

You already said that.

>Yet, one look at the Princess of Friendship’s expression//

It's rare for a comma after a conjunction to be used correctly. This one isn't.

>we changelings//

You're inconsistent in whether you capitalize that.

>predators,” at that the narrator hugely yawned//

Speech tag with no speaking verb.

>success: How to shape-shift//

Only capitalize after a colon if it refers to multiple sentences.

>leaving the prey unharmed; none the wiser//

Misused semicolon.

>There was over two thousand Hives//

were

>yes,” the narrator lifted up a foreleg, obviously stressing the many perforations there.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>feeling them die.”//

You don't need those closing quotation marks.

>It was utterly silent in the throne room, it felt as if everypony was holding their breath.//

Comma splice.

>Dash,” the changeling repeated, “Which//

Capitalization.

>the broken halves of the standard was//

were

>the horrified alicorn//

Twilight holds the perspective here. Why would she refer to herself so externally?

Overall thoughts from chapter 1:
You shouldn't use hyphens when you have a simple adverb-adjective structure, like "barely detectable." You do this a lot.

>High overhead, it seemed as if one of the clouds had shivered and, in the process, shed itself of several pieces of its blackness.//

This is symptomatic of the perspective. An omniscient narrator would deal only in facts. The fact that the narrator here uses "seemed" without saying to whom it seemed that way makes it a limited narrator. There are many other examples of this, like how the narration trails off, asks questions, and speaks Twilight's thought for her. That all is fine. I noted one place where it sounded like you'd jumped to Dash's viewpoint, but you're mostly consistent.

The problem is the first scene. The narrator still sounds that way, but there's no identifiable perspective. He doesn't speak any characters' impression for them. He doesn't seem to represent any character. He even breaks the fourth wall and addresses the audience.

The other problem with the narrative voicing is that it's inconsistent in tone. One sentence, it's making a lowbrow and comedic observation, and the next, it's taking a regular sentence and replacing every word with the most obscure synonym you can find. I'm getting tonal whiplash for whether the narrator is trying to be down to earth or purple. Purple would actually fit Twilight, as long as you still didn't have the tone yo-yo like it had been, but you largely drop that effect once we get to the scenes where she's present.

Speaking of tonal whiplash, you start out portraying this band of changelings as if we're in for a bunch of slapstick humor, but then most of the chapter instead presents them as very solemn and serious. The story even takes a very serious turn. That's a very difficult thing to do well, and it just ends up feeling like the story's not sure what it wants to be. As I read the rest of the chapters, I'll see whether that straightens itself out.

Lastly, a significant chunk of this chapter is taken up by a heavily expository monologue. That's not a good way to keep readers interested. By having just one speaker for long stretches and eliminating nearly all character actions, the story becomes very abstract, and it's easy to get disconnected from it. The one cool detail you have there, that the windigoes the ponies brought with them nearly made the changelings extinct, gets buried under all that. It's also rather difficult to have an expository summary be emotionally engaging for the reader. It'd probably be a good idea to have the changelings react more emotionally during the telling of it, as a proxy for the readers, so there are some cues as to how they all feel about it. All we get is the one changeling being uniformly scowl-y about it, so it's a pretty monotonous reaction.

I'll read the rest anyway, but your note in the synopsis that you're going to release a significantly rewritten and expanded version of this means I'm probably not going to be able to approve it under any circumstances until you've finished that. If you fixed all this up and I approved it, then at some point, there'd be a very different version of it posted than what I'd seen, and that's not something we're willing to do.

And why are you putting the chapter titles at the top? FiMFic already does that, so they're up there twice now.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3621

>>3620
Chapter 2:
As I continue on, I'm not going to keep pulling out examples of the same things I saw in chapter 1, so assume you still need to scan the whole story for the issues already noted.

>They silently hovered there, wings lightly buzzing//

If they're buzzing, they're not silent, are they?

>yet-still-concealing//

You only need that second hyphen.

>they’d ran//

run

>broodingly pondered//

The narrative voice is getting a bit off track again. You're using Dash as your perspective character in this scene—the narrator is essentially her train of thought. So she's the one making the word choices here, and this doesn't sound like something she'd come up with, especially in an off-the-cuff manner like this.

>daunting somesthetic, kinesthetic, and spatial awareness//

Yeah, this really doesn't sound like Dash at all. When she's your perspective character in a limited narration, then the narration shouldn't sound too far off from how she might speak, and I can't see her using those words.

>“Apple Bloom!” she cried out, “Apple Bloom!”//

The punctuation and capitalization pattern here mean "Apple Bloom! Apple Bloom!" is one sentence, but it clearly has end punctuation and capitalization in the middle of it.

>Dropping to her knees the anguished pegasus//

Set off the participial phrase with a comma, and "the anguished pegasus" is a really external way for Dash to refer to herself. You don't call yourself anything like "the fanfic author" in your own thoughts, do you?

>—hers in particular, and others as well—//

You use these asides so often that they're really sticking out as a writing tic. You want me remembering what happened in the story, not the fact that I seemingly saw a couple of these per paragraph. And here's the other problem: use use them equally, no matter who holds the perspective. Dash, Twilight, one of the changelings, whatever the perspective was in the opening scene of chapter 1... it makes their individual voices run together, and that's not a good thing.

>Turning to face the changeling, strong emotions rocked the usually-brash pegasus.//

This is a danger of participles. Thy sometimes seem to describe something other than intended, and they sometimes try to describe something they can't because it isn't even in the sentence. The former is the case here. You want Dash to turn, but this says her emotions do.

I'd already commented about Dash's word choice in her limited narration not fitting her well. Consider also how many semicolons you have her use, or maybe that she's using them at all. That means that she knows how to use them, and that she'd be inclined to in whatever the situation is. And right now, she's in an emergency where her attention is going to be anywhere but on advanced grammar and vocabulary.

>G.good//

Not sure what you meant to do here, but this isn't right.

>“Oh, no, no, no!” violently shaking her head in denial.//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>A look of horror spread across her face//

She's your perspective character. How can she see her own face to determine this? The horror should be more internal to her anyway. There would be thoughts, internal sensations associated with it. She shouldn't have to know how she looks to identify the emotion.

>Twi-twilight//

Her name's a proper noun, so capitalize it every time you start it.

>. . .couldn’t//

Inconsistent with how you've been spacing these.

>It only took one look for Twilight to understand that the changeling was gone; far beyond the reach of any healing, any spell. Rainbow Dash saw the sympathy, sorrow, and regret in her friend’s eyes and, with a loud sob, collapsed, shamelessly weeping.//

Then scene's been in Twilight's perspective, but that second sentence isn't something Twilight could know. It's in Dash's viewpoint.

>Wings loudly buzzling//

Absolute phrases also get set off by commas, and there seems to be a typo.

>ranging in size from dust and pebbles up through several massive boulders//

In addition to the sheer number of these asides, consider which ones are even relevant. Is this important information? Is it something Twilight would even bother commenting on in this situation?

>Thank Sun and Moon!//

No reason to capitalize "thank" here.

>the little sister of Twilight’s dear friend Rarity//

>the orphaned pegasus filly that might as well be Rainbow Dash’s little sister//
Again, relevance. The reader will already know this, and would Twilight even be thinking about it at the moment?

>ling explained//

I don't recall you referring to one as "ling" before. Why are you starting now? Or had you inadvertently deleted something here?

>such,” ling paused as he followed the progress, “they//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag. I hesitate to tell you how to include even more asides in your story, but if you want one in a quote, here's how:
>such”—ling paused as he followed the progress—“they//
if he doesn't stop speaking for the action and:
>such—” ling paused as he followed the progress “—they//
if he does.

>That,” ling gestured with a perforated foreleg, “is//

Same deal, but you really shouldn't be breaking into a quote more than once for an aside or speech tag.

>No sooner did they land —looking greyish, exhausted and drained, dropping to the ground the moment wings were folded— then a third changeling//

That phrasing uses "than."

>ling explained//

>ling matter-of-factly explained//
Repetitive to use these as consecutive speaking verbs.

>the race responsible for invading their land, claiming it for themselves and, in the process, destroyed their civilization and came close to driving them into extinction//

The verb tenses are inconsistent here. "Invading" is a present participle, and the correct choice here, but then you go to simple past for "destroyed" and "came."

>No sooner had the conserver finished then the remaining changeling buzzed forward//

than

>before she winked out, reappearing next to Twilight//

Wait, Rarity can teleport? When's she ever done that before?

>feeling betrayed//

Twilight's your perspective character, but how would she know this?

>still aggrieved and furious, but those emotions slithered to a stop when her pegasus friend, in a stronger, determined voice, declared//

This sure sounds like you've shifted to Rarity's perspective.

>her,” and again tears started flowing//

>Rarity,” she was freely weeping again//
Non-speaking actions used as speech tags, and pretty repetitive actions.

>an emotion she wasn’t accustomed to feeling//

And now you're going over to Dash's perspective? Until you get experience with determining when it's a good idea to shift perspective and how to do it smoothly, you really ought to stick to one viewpoint per scene. What you say from Rarity's and Dash's heads in this scene doesn't add anything important to the story, certainly nothing Twilight couldn't have surmised by observing them from her own perspective.

>Horns softly glowing, barely perceived even in the semi-shade of the chasm’s depths, nothing seemed to happen at first.//

Similar issue with it being unclear what a participial describes. This says that "nothing" has its horn glowing and is barely perceived.

>What made her queasy//

You just used "queasily" two paragraphs ago.

>do,” she gestured with a forehoof, “let//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>back, not to the Castle, but to the hospital instead, with the message that three fillies were badly hurt and would need air transport back//

Watch the close repetition of "back."

>Highness?” the medico began, “Did//

Capitalization/punctuation.

>“Go ahead Rarity,” Rainbow nudged the anxious unicorn.//

Needs a comma for direct address, non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Sorry Squirt//

Needs a comma for direct address, and that's just a generic nickname. It wouldn't be capitalized.

>We,” she gestured at the nine guards behind her, “would like to feed you.”//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

Chapter 3:
Once again, I'll stop pointing out things that occurred a lot in chapters 1 and 2 so that I can focus on new issues.

Okay, you're starting out with an odd narration here, even more so than chapter 1. And it's one who's very aware he has an audience. That opens a can of worms as to who his audience is and why that audience is there.

>the best restaurants in San Prancisco//

This doesn't make sense. The best restaurants in the city are a selling point for the city? Isn't that true of every city?

>Placing a small, gleaming stone into its receptacle in the communications unit, the stone glowed for a moment before disappearing//

This says the stone placed itself.

>Taking a deep breath, the captain passed along the instruction to his driver/communications pony.//

Here's another danger of participles: they mean that things happen at the same time. He wouldn't speak until after he'd taken a breath.

>Look!//

When you have a word italicized for emphasis, include any exclamation mark or question mark on it in the italics.

>Phillydelphia//

Canon spelling is Fillydelphia.

>a rescue parachangelings//

Mixing singular and plural.

>ponies lives//

Missing possessive.

>Faces turned grim as they knelled on, knowing that something very serious had just happened somewhere in their home of San Prancisco.//

This says that either the faces or the sounds knew that something serious had happened.

>five of them arraigned around their central commander//

You sure you didn't mean arranged?

In the end, this story felt kind of fragmented or schizophrenic. I've certainly seen ones that have such loosely connected scenes, but yours leave a whole lot of guesswork between what happened between chapters. At least in chapter 3, that gets explained, but as I said for a significant part of chapter 2, it's done through a whole lot of exposition after the key events already happened. It's very tricky to have the story's climaxes occur completely off camera, and we're only seeing the aftermath. Immediate aftermath is sometimes fine, since we're still seeing the characters' raw emotional reactions to it, but this is more distant.

I spent the first half of chapter 3 wondering what was going on, and finally, you tied it back in with the changelings' rescue techniques used in chapter 2, but you skipped over so much of how things got to be this way that the connection feels weak. Then you try to re-establish it by a bunch of narrative exposition, but that's not a very good way to get the reader engaged with it.

That fractured feel to the separate chapters, plus the way the story starts out as if it's going to be a slapstick comedy, only to shift gears into a rather serious story the rest of the way.

I'm wondering if all these issues are things you intend to address in the expanded version you say you want to write. I think it's worth reducing the tonal dissonance and not having so many of the important parts occur off camera.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3653

Note that this list is not comprehensive. I picked out a few examples of each kind of error or problem I found. Of course, not everything is a black-and-white issue; this is not a list of things you have to fix, but take each under advisement.

Chapter 1:
>The human female//
He's been calling her by name in dialogue, so why is he referring to her like this in the narration, which is effectively his train of thought? You don't mentally use such references for acquaintances, do you?

>the dalek’s nerve-endings outraced the self-contained explosion that would immolate it; barely enough time to even register it.//

For a semicolon to be used right, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both resulting sentences stand as complete. What comes after it here would be a fragment.

>The pain didn’t last as long time//

Phrasing is off.

>And eventually, no doubt, tortured, as it had been by Van Statten.//

There are a few lines like this that are a bit problematic. It's tied to how you state in the opening author's note that the reader should have seen a particular Doctor Who episode before reading this, but that's not how we treat crossover stories. For our purposes, you should assume the reader has little to no knowledge of Doctor Who and write the story so someone like that could understand it. The beginning was fine. If I hadn't seen it, I wouldn't know who Rose was, but you talked through the circumstances enough that I have a little background about how long the war has been going on, and why this dalek is different. But here, I'm left completely on my own. Just give me a couple sentences about who Van Statten is and what he did.

>the fact that the dalek was even considering//

Considering what? You're missing a direct object.

>“I am Celestia,” The creature said//

Capitalization.

>all-too familiar//

Hyphenate all that, since it's a single unit describing "feeling" just after it.

>“You are lying!” The dalek exclaimed//

>“I shall not die again!” The dalek stated//
Capitalization.

>Celestia stood on her four hooves.//

As opposed to... six of them?

>But up here,” she put one hoof to her head, “in your mind//

If you want to wedge a non-speaking narrative action into quote like this, here's how to format it:
But up here—” she put one hoof to her head “—in your mind

>And what Celestia as suggesting//

Typo.

>must…” she looked away, “as//

Use that same dash formatting to put the aside in the quote.

>“Will it hurt?” It asked.//

Capitalization.

>The process was no long//

Typo.

I'm not sure I buy Celestia's explanation. She said she'd turn the dalek into what it would have been if it'd come from Equestria, but there are other creatures there. Something evil like a dalek wouldn't become an old-school changeling, or something like Tirek, a diamond dog, etc.? It seems more like she's forcing it to be a pony than it being a natural conclusion. Furthermore, it sounds like whenever she does this, she always changes the creature into a pony. I don't understand why that would be the case.

>“Daleks have no need for happiness!” She objected.//

Capitalization.

>At length, Celestia opened her eyes again after several moments//

The "after several moments" is redundant with "at length," but there also an issue that you use "moment" so much it's getting repetitive. You have 18 in the chapter, and there's a cluster of them just before this one, where you use it 6 times in 11 paragraphs. Do a Ctrl-f for it and watch the screen light up.

>“I think,” she said at length//

And you're using "at length" pretty soon after the previous time.

>she’s a purple alicorn//

She hasn't explained to him what an alicorn is.

>“Daleks have no concept of friendship!” she objected.//

You've also been repeatedly using that speaking verb.

Chapter 2:
>after several rels//
I'm a Doctor Who fan, and I don't remember what this is. How does a non-fan have any chance? Give me a little context as to how long this is.

>towards the road and began to glide down it towards//

Watch the close word repetition.

>she realized that this was yet another emotion added to her repertoire – trust//

This is fine, but using a colon instead of a dash would be a little more precise, since you're making a clarification.

>The trot was slow, an ungainly.//

Typo.

>The emotions inside of her//

You do go on to name these, which is usually not a great idea, but she doesn't understand them yet, so that's fine. But you want the reader feeling this with her. Give me some more about how it actually feels. What physical sensations does the feeling give her? Does she react to them at all?

Another thing I'm noticing in this chapter: you use a ton of "to be" verbs. They're dreadfully boring, as nothing happens. It's impractical to try removing them all from a story, but you should take whatever opportunities you can to give your story more motion. Do a Ctrl-f on " was " (include the spaces) and watch your screen light up. They're everywhere, and that's only one form of the verb.

>It was tiny, not much larger than the pupils of her now overlarge eyes…//

How does she know how big her pupils are? She hasn't gotten a thorough look at herself, and she's not doing so now. If she thought her eyes were big, it stands to reason she would have said so when she first saw them, but she can't now.

>as she used both hooves to dig out the crystal, falling back onto her haunches as she struggled to pick it up between them//

It's really clunky to use multiple "as" clauses in a sentence. Not only is it repetitive, but they fight each other for synchronizing what happens in the sentence.

>It wasn’t nearly as clear as her the lens had once been//

Extraneous word.

>an promptly proceeded to get her legs tangled up//

Typo.

>as she neared the town, moving back and forth as they pursued their tasks for the day//

Doubling up on the "as" clauses again.

> “You! Pony!” She said//

Capitalization.

>The mare’s expression changed, from one of curiousness to one of annoyance.//

Again, don't just name emotions. You're making me invent these expressions. You tell me what they look like and let me deduce curiosity and annoyance from your description. But more to the point, your narrator, who doesn't understand emotions yet, is somehow making this conclusion for me. She should be especially ill-equipped to identify them explicitly like this.

>The other pony paused as Soldier’s response, her expression now shifting to confusion.//

Same. And that "as" should be "at."

>ponies could convey a lot of meaning through facial expression alone//

See, you say this is something she's paying a lot of attention to, and yet the narration never describes it. It just tells me what to think.

>The mare rolled her eyes. Soldier was unsure as to the meaning of that gesture.//

This is more like it. You let Carrot Top's actions speak for themselves, and Soldier doesn't understand the context for them. This is how a lot of the story should be going.

>“I will not.” Soldier confirmed//

Punctuation.

>muttering in annoyance//

Especially when you use an in/of/with emotion phrasing, it's usually redundant with something already in the sentence. Muttering conveys annoyance on its own. Saying it outright as well is redundant. It's like you're afraid the reader can't interpret emotional cues from your characters.

>run-over//

The way you're using it, this shouldn't be hyphenated.

>what was designated as the Ponyville library//

How does she know? Carrot Top didn't describe it.

>Soldier found herself before what was designated as the Ponyville library//

>Soldier quickly found herself standing inside the library//
It's rather repetitive to have these so close together.

>The once-dalek felt the fur on her coat stand slightly on end in indignation//

See previous comment about "in emotion" phrases being redundant with actions already in the sentence.

>“Sort of,” he shrugged.//

That's a poor choice of speaking verb. How do you shrug a sentence?

>do…” he scratched the back of his head.//

And that speech tag doesn't have anything resembling a speaking action.

>At a confused look from Spike//

You're having her identify emotions again that she probably shouldn't understand how to interpret yet.

>A dalek in a starship would be constantly observed by other dalek//

That should be plural, right?

>“Um…Spike?” The purple pony asked//

Capitalization.

>The reptilian//

Soldier knows his name now. Why would she keep calling him this?

>“Twilight!” He exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>dropping his weapon and charging at the purple pony, hugging one of her legs tightly//

you've got two common problems in your use of participial phrases here. One, by it placement, it sounds like Twilight is the one hugging her leg, and two, they synchronize all these actions where it doesn't make sense to. He wouldn't hug her leg until after he'd charged at her, but you have him doing both at the same time.

>“Okay, um…ma’am?” she leaned over slightly//

You've left that lower-case like it's a speaking action, but it isn't.

Chapter 3:
>Twilight Sparkle’s eyes fluttered//
>wings fluttering a few times//
These are only a couple paragraphs apart.

>Her second-in-command//

She knows his name. Why won't she use it?

>hugging one of her hind legs tightly//

You just had him do this at the end of the last chapter. Are you repeating this deliberately?

>“K…killed things?” She demanded.//

Capitalization.

>Soldier looked between them in confusion.//

You don't need that "in confusion." Her behavior here and the narration through the rest of the paragraph already convey that mood.

>looked to Spike. “Looks//

Watch the close word repetition.

>Owlicious//

Owlowicious.

>Spike looked between Twilight and Soldier//

>Spike looked at Soldier//
There's a lot of looking going on in this chapter.

>Now, um…” he looked down at his attire//

Yet more looking, and this isn't a speaking action.

>mahself…” she held out a hoof.//

Not a speaking action. Put one in there or make the narrative action a separate sentence.

>looked to Soldier//

>looked to Applejack//
This already comes to 12 uses of "look" in the chapters, and I'm not even a quarter of the way through it yet.

>Twilight did not explain the requirements to do so)//

>but it was what she was stuck with)//
>Soldier was determined to figure out)//
Missing end punctuation.

>other).//

Because this isn't done as an aside inside another sentence, the period goes inside the parentheses.

>Earth//

So you're putting Equestria on Earth? That's problematic for both universes, but especially Doctor Who, where our Earth explicitly exists. Or is this an AU of Doctor Who where Equestria is on Earth? If so, you're not marking it as one. Is it just that Soldier assumes it's still Earth? That could be clearer.

>Applejack having gone home some time ago//

This is oddly placed. It's completely irrelevant to anything around it. Why does Soldier even bring it up now?

>The purple alicorn//

Soldier knows her name.

>malfunction!” She exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>travel machine//

You'd been capitalizing that previously.

>dice-up//

diced-up

>Daleks have a concept of sight.//

Why is so much of this passage in present tense?

Chapter 4:
>travel machine//
You're still being inconsistent as to whether you capitalize this.

>creator, Davros//

If you're giong to use "Davros" as an appositive like that, it needs commas on both sides.

>Soldier wished that she had taken the eye-crystal from her Mark-III travel machine with her, she badly wanted to look into it as she might the ocular sensor of another dalek//

That's a comma splice, and I've seen several in the story so far, but this is the most blatant one.

>let’s get your teeth fixed//

Zecora fixed Apple Bloom's chipped tooth by having her drink a potion in the show. Why wouldn't that work in this case?

>It looked, to Soldier,//

You're using a limited narrator. Anything in the narration is already understood to be what Soldier thought. Pointing it out explicitly is unnecessary, redundant, and against the point of using a limited narrator.

>know…” she pointed to the wall, on which hung a piece of paper in a frame, “that//

Use the dash formatting for asides again.

>sorry!” She exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>some form of protective covering//

>so as to not spoil the sanitation of her front hooves//
These would seem to be contradictory. Soldier doesn't know what the covering is for, yet immediately explains what Minuette's purpose is? Either she knows or she doesn't, or else she reasons through it, but you're playing both sides.

>“Ho,” Soldier intoned, meaning to say no. Her meaning came across, at least.//

This says the same thing three times. Just have her say it. The reader can figure this out.

Lots of looking going on in this chapter too.

>is...” she lifted her clipboard again and took a pen into her mouth, scribbling on it, “...thaying.//

Use the dash aside format.

>Twilight Sparkle left//

Why'd you put a scene break here? You haven't skipped to a different place, time, or perspective. You've only used it to gloss over Twilight's exit, and barely at that.

>whirring//

Why'd you italicize that? It's a legitimate word, not a sound effect, and in better writing, you don't see sound effects italicized like this anyway. Same deal with the "tsked" you've used several times, and this one makes another appearance later.

>I don’t know what’s going on, which is very unusual, I normally consider myself to be quite well informed and experienced.//

The second comma is a splice.

>‘that’s Ponyville for you’.//

This inner quote has the same rules as any quote. It should be capitalized, and the period goes inside the quotation marks.

>lay her down on the chair//

They're tough verbs to keep straight, but this should be "laid."

>goodness that causes Soldier//

You've switched to present tense.

>Mark-I//

You've never used a hyphen in this naming convention before.

>- Princess Celestia must still have been in the process of fabricating them -//

You'd been using proper dashes before, but from here through the rest of the chapter, you've switched to hyphens for some reason.

>your - “//

Note that things like spaces and dashes can break smart quotes. These are backward. I bet they aren't the only ones in the story that got turned around.

>“Doctor what?” She asked.//

Capitalization.

Pre-reader 63.546!vZ.Mh9z92UCountry code: blank.gif, country type: blank, valid: 3654

>>3653
Chapter 5:
>Soldier ran straight towards where the crystal that had once been the optical lens of her Mark-III travel machine, on the library’s table.//
That doesn't parse. The "where" clause doesn't have a verb.

You still have issues with whether you capitalize "travel machine" or add a hyphen after "Mark." Just go through the whole story for those.

>Staring into it, the ludicrousness of the situation and what she was doing finally occurred to Soldier.//

This says that the ludicrousness was staring into it.

>Twilight seemed utterly shocked//

How so? Let me see it and make my own judgment.

>“Except…” she looked back to Twilight, quieter.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>Dalek?” She asked slowly.//

>sorry!” She said//
Capitalization.

>At first she thought it some form of attack, but though Twilight was embracing her tightly, it was not with remotely enough force to hurt.//

She witnessed Twilight doing this to Spike back in chapter 3. Why is it suddenly a mystery?

>But my friends and I recently returned the Elements to the Tree of Harmony that they came from in order to save Equestria from the Everfree Forest growing out of control.//

I'm guessing you wrote this some time ago. Because this season, the girls were able to temporarily take the elements back from the tree.

>Nightmare Child//

Now you're making references again that I'd have no hope of understanding unless I was familiar with a specific Doctor Who episode. If it's important for me to know what this is, give me a little more background each time you bring it up. If not, then maybe it's better to cut it.

>At least, I wouldn’t want to be friends with any other dragon I’ve met.//

I assume you wrote this before Ember and Smolder came along.

>read…” he picked up the book from the floor and opened it up to the page they had stopped on, “…you//

Use the aside formatting I showed you.

>book shelf//

bookshelf

Chapter 6:
>standing up and hopping down from the table, heading towards the stairs//
Note that participial phrase mean that things happen simultaneously, so he stands up, hops off the table, and goes to the stairs at the same time. Logically, he'd have to do those in order.

>slight click//

>quiet whirr//
Don't italicize the sound effects.

>“She?” The Doctor echoed.//

Capitalization.

>Never said it’s gender.//

Its/it's confusion.

>surprise attack!//

I don't understand his motivation at all. The Doctor is a guy who's lived in town for a long time. They have no reason to think he's dangerous at all. But Spike's immediately going to fight him. Compare to Soldier, who is immediately aggressive toward everything, admits to being a soldier with lots of destructive power... and when both accuse the other of being dangerous, Solider is the one they believe? That's pretty hard to accept.

>his own mouth, a metal wand with a purple crystal at its end – a sonic probe of his own//

Watch the repetitive phrasing.

>“Oi!” The Doctor exclaimed. //

Capitalization.

>calling out “exterminate!”//

You need a comma and capitalization the same as you would with any quote.

>a cry of surprise//

Another one of those unnecessary tacked-on emotion phrases.

>a line of green flame cut between him and the probe//

You have Soldier screaming "exterminate" and shooting at the Doctor, while he's made zero aggressive moves against anyone. And Spike's still going to take Soldier's side? We usually call out OCs as Mary Sues for this kind of thing.

>back just as Spike slid on by, grabbing the probe and running back over to Soldier. “Don’t worry, I got your back!” He said//

Repetitive use of "back," capitalization.

>metallic snap//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>She saw it was Spike, he had charged at her and flung himself at her with all the force his small body could muster; her own clumsiness on her hooves greatly aiding his attempt and making up for the considerable difference in mass between them.//

For a semicolon to be properly used, you should be able to replace it with a period and have both sentences stand as complete. What comes after it here couldn't.

>felt a thrum//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>aura wrapped around Spike’s form//

>Soldier wrapped her forelegs around Spike//
Repetitive to have these so close together.

>pointing up at Soldier’s horn.//

>Soldier glanced up at her horn//
Same.

>“Daleks do not like anything!”//

And he's still convinced she's in the right...

>“Yours can’t!” The Doctor called out.//

Capitalization.

>began to whirr again//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>“Exterminate!” She called//

Capitalization.

>make it to the stairs and start running up it//

You have singular "it" referring to plural "stairs."

>Water sprayed out an hit the door//

Typo.

>familiar whirr//

>loud whine//
Don't italicize sound effects.

>sonics?!” He demanded//

Capitalization.

>the Twilight Sparkle’s//

Extraneous word.

>the Doctor would know that to//

To/too confusion.

>“Spike!” The Doctor called//

>“Very tautological!” The Doctor called up//
Capitalization.

>Spike hasn’t broken Soldier’s eye contact.//

Why'd you switch to present tense?

>didn’t you?” The Doctor called up.//

Capitalization. And it's getting repetitive to keep using that speaking action.

>There was a whirr from behind Soldier//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>Hello Spike.//

Needs a comma for direct address.

>Dalek?” The Doctor asked//

Capitalization.

>sending out a new whirr//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>tree - a sound//

Use a proper dash.

>In there was as close to Hell as Dalek thought allowed to exist//

I'm not sure whether you meant to say "the dalek" or "daleks," but it isn't right as phrased, and I doubt you meant to capitalize it.

>in disbelief and betrayal//

>showing only anger and hatred//
There you go naming emotions again.

Chapter 7:
>By default, the main room of the Type-40 TARDIS that Soldier entered was simple in its layout,//
A colon would look a whole lot better there, since you're defining the layout.

>trophies and mementos from across the Doctor’s lifespan//

How does she know that they are? For all she can tell, he picked up some stuff at a junkyard that caught his eye.

>that?” He demanded.//

Capitalization.

>She stared at him, confused.//

So make her sound confused. Don't tell me she is.

>then?” The Doctor asked.//

Capitalization.

>His device was many generations in advance of the fairly crude one Soldier had been able to construct, it probably included a psychic readout and interface.//

Comma splice.

>I knew you were filth.”//

He picks right up speaking again in the next paragraph, so leave the closing quotes off this one.

>minuette’s fur//

Capitalization.

>with indignation//

Let me see it.

>What is going on?” She asked.//

Capitalization.

>here…” she then tapped the same hoof to her chest.//

Using a non-speaking action as a speech tag.

>"Speaking of - "//

Use a proper dash. And you have simple-style quotation marks, whereas you use fancy ones through the rest of the story.

>a look of confusion on his face//

Don't tell me he's confused. Demonstrate it.

>a very long ways away//

way

>back!” She exclaimed//

Capitalization.

>confused eyes, she could see them even through her tears. He’d retrieved his sonic probe again and was scanning her in confusion//

So he's confused, is what I'm getting.

>“She doesn’t…” The Doctor began//

Capitalization.

It's worth doing a Ctrl-f for "back." You have quite a few of them around here, and it's getting repetitive.

>flash-pop//

Don't italicize sound/visual effects.

>looks of determination//

Don't make me invent what this looks like. Show me.

>details…” A yellow-coated pegasus ventured//

Capitalization.

>doctor Minuette//

When attached to a name like that, "Doctor" would be capitalized.

>then moved aside a small purple dragon – Spike – pushed past her//

Seems like you're missing a word or two in there.

>EMERGENCY…!//

That combination doesn't make sense. How do you trail off emphatically? They're opposite effects.

>Yet again, for the uncountable time in his long and storied life, the Doctor felt like a complete idiot as he watched all the ponies hugging Soldier.//

The entire story had been from Soldier's POV until now. Why, after nearly 7 chapters and 30k words, are you going to switch? There's nothing vital we learn from being in the Doctor's viewpoint, and it just stands out as the part that doesn't belong. If there's something you think is important to convey here, have him do it as Solider's observation of him. You haven't been building up any sort of reader investment in him to have him suddenly take up a character arc.

>idiot.” Minuette said.//

Punctuation.

>The Doctor looked to Minuette.//

How is it that he wasn't already looking at her? He was talking with her, so that's just the default everyone will assume, and you've never said anywhere else he was looking.

>against to his chest//

Extraneous word.

>He turned a little to look down to Minuette//

And again, you've never said he was looking anywhere else.

>looking up to the Doctor//

Same with her. And there's an awful lot of looking going on.

>anything?” He asked.//

Capitalization.

Chapter 8:
>One Week Later…//
There are more elegant ways of indicating this.

>She actually was not certain what the book was supposed to be informative of; the cover image depicted a gray-toned earth pony stallion//

Comma splice.

>down stairs//

That should be one word.

>the wording in the book was annoying simple//

annoyingly

>Soldier growled, a low vocalization of displeasure from the back of her throat.//

Yes, that would be the definition of a growl. The reader will presumably know this already.

>commands!” She demanded.//

Capitalization.

>“You’re talking to yourself…” Spike’s voice ventured.//

Spike ventured this, not his voice.

>“Did I wake you?” She asked.//

Capitalization.

>group-hug//

That's not a hyphenated term.

>S’ like that//

The missing letter is before the "S." The apostrophe should go there.

>When I breath fire//

Typo.

>snap-pop//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>Only, this balloon was not filled with helium//

Don't put a comma after a conjunction except in very specific circumstances.

>popped open//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>Soldier called out in shock//

She already sounds shocked. You don't need to say so directly.

>No sooner had she moved then another balloon appeared//

In this sense, you need to use "than."

>The principle way//

Principle/principal confusion.

>snap-pop//

>thrum//
Don't italicize sound effects.

>Soldier reached up a hoot//

Is she an owl now?

>work!” He said//

Capitalization.

>flash-pop//

Don't italicize sound effects.

>but holding the door open, waving a hoof, indicating Soldier should enter.//

It's obvious what his intent is. Why do you need to spell it out?

>“Old habits!” He said//

>“…Enjoyable?” The Doctor ventured//
Capitalization.

>“Right…” the Doctor looked away//

Non-speaking action used as speech tag.

>Soldier looked between the Doctor and Minuette//

You still have a ton of looking going on. This is already the 22nd one of the chapter.

>either journey through time…or a journey//

Missing word.

>began to flow upwards.

>
>The Doctor began//
Repetitive to have those so close together, but authors in general tend to overuse "begin" and "start" actions. It's self-explanatory that any given action would start. It's only worth pointing out the beginning when it's significant for some reason, like the action is sudden or it gets interrupted.

>The Doctor proceeded over to the TARDIS’ doors, opening them.//

This says he does both at the same time, but realistically, he'd do them in sequence.

>deep watered//

Hyphenate.

>the jungle gradually gave way//

This is the third "gave way" of the paragraph.

>You’re looking at Skaro//

This is the 11th "look" in just the last 6 paragraphs.

>He had been about the nuzzle her//

Typo.

>one?” She asked//

Capitalization.

>an was encouraging it//

Typo.

>Soldier did not know who either were.//

"Either" should be treated as singular in this case, so "who either was."

>found herself looking at a darkening evening sky//

This is a pretty lazy phrasing, and you use it a fair amount.

Epilogue:
>I promise you, Soldier//
Why is Celestia using direct address so much? It's unnatural. When you're having a one-on-one conversation, how often do you do this? Direct address is for getting someone's attention, disambiguating the intended target, or emphasis. Soldier should have no doubt Celestia is talking to her, and Celestia has her full attention, so emphasis is the only possibility left, but most of what she's saying doesn't warrant that. Besides, if you use emphasis too much it defeats the purpose. When everything is special, nothing is.

>in…” she waved a hoof at Soldier’s flanks.//

Non-speaking action used as a speech tag.

>Soldier’s head tilted to the side in confusion.//

Another blatant emotional tell, but consider that she's doing so about her own emotion, and in a rather external way. She'd have to see herself to note how the head tilt lookd confused, but the visual is all you're giving me. She's the one who's confused. Shouldn't her narration sound like she's confused?

>Celestia slowly trotted up to the library’s door, placing a hoof on it.//

Another participle synchronization issue. She wouldn't do these at the same time.


Delete Post [ ]
Edit Post
[ home ] [ site / arch ] [ pony / oat / chat ] [ rp / fan ]