What do you think of the above person's title?
#201
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:06 AM
#202
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:07 AM
#203
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:23 AM
#204
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:25 AM
HER.
#205
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:56 AM
#206
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:00 AM
Cereal can be confusing.
#207
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:06 AM
#208
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:09 AM
#209
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:09 AM
#210
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:10 AM
#211
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:13 AM
#212
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:15 AM
#213
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:16 AM
#214
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:17 AM
It's algebraic!
Why wub algebwah.
And to YOU tux_peng. Hello.
#215
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:17 AM
Indeed you do. I've seen you talk.
Edited by AntoineDepardieu, 02 October 2012 - 01:18 AM.
#216
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:19 AM
#217
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:19 AM
((I will never stop being the management.))
Edited by Flaming Night, 02 October 2012 - 01:20 AM.
#218
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:20 AM
#219
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:20 AM
Rarity + Weird = Normal
Edited by Thunder Strike, 02 October 2012 - 01:21 AM.
#220
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:20 AM
AND NINJA'D
A WHOLE LOT OF NINJAS
Edited by FaffleMaster, 02 October 2012 - 01:21 AM.
#221
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:22 AM
No comment
#222
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:22 AM
Knew it. Good thing I have my cross-out-ery skillz!
Edited by EP1CWAFF1E, 02 October 2012 - 01:23 AM.
#223
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:35 AM
#224
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:36 AM
#225
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:38 AM
Edited by Flaming Night, 02 October 2012 - 01:38 AM.
#226
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:45 AM
#227
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:24 AM
#228
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:29 AM
#229
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:35 AM
*Tries to keep a straight face*
#230
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:37 AM
#231
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:45 AM
#232
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:48 AM
#233
Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:39 AM
#234
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:46 PM
Happy kitty,
Sleepy kitty,
Purr, purr, purr.
#235
Posted 02 October 2012 - 02:46 PM
"Told you to get out now your frozen."
still management though
#236
Posted 02 October 2012 - 02:53 PM
#237
Posted 02 October 2012 - 02:55 PM
#238
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:53 PM
#239
Posted 03 October 2012 - 12:08 AM
#240
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:00 AM
#241
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:04 AM
Edited by Golfmann14, 03 October 2012 - 01:05 AM.
#242
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:10 AM
2% cooler every 1 second actually adds up to 21.899441999475713024% cooler at 10 seconds...

Rainbow Dash is a disappoint...
Edited by WonderDash, 03 October 2012 - 01:14 AM.
#243
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:58 AM

Twilight is disappoint.
#244
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:58 AM
yay sweaters!
Edited by Senator Lemonsnout, 03 October 2012 - 01:58 AM.
#245
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:00 AM
What? 20% over 10 seconds is the proportion 20/10 which reduces to 2/1, thus, 2 percent in 1 second.Your math is actually invalid...
2% cooler every 1 second actually adds up to 21.899441999475713024% cooler at 10 seconds...
Rainbow Dash is a disappoint...
Basic math fails guise....
Every time someone's math is wrong.... Twilight facehoofs somewhere....
Edited by Golfmann14, 03 October 2012 - 02:01 AM.
#246
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:22 AM
#247
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:33 AM
#248
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:52 AM
Rethink it for a bit... As every 1 second past, you get 2% cooler from the second before that, which means 1.02 times whatever you had before... Use basic algebra...What? 20% over 10 seconds is the proportion 20/10 which reduces to 2/1, thus, 2 percent in 1 second.
Basic math fails guise....
Every time someone's math is wrong.... Twilight facehoofs somewhere....
Now that I have to facepalm to. Nice catch.You spelt either 'Revolution' or 'Revelation' wrong.
Twilight is disappoint.
Back on topic: Too much information!
Edited by WonderDash, 03 October 2012 - 02:54 AM.
#249
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:53 AM
#250
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:56 AM
#251
Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:02 AM
You are correct. Rainbow Dash is 120% cool. If any regular pony is Less than or equal to 100% cool, Rainbow Dash is at least 20% cooler. So if Rainbow is what she says gains 2% more coolness each second over the span of 10 seconds, she ultimately results in 1.20 meaning 120% or 20% cooler than any other pony.Rethink it for a bit... As every 1 second past, you get 2% cooler from the second before that, which means 1.02 times whatever you had before... Use basic algebra...
Thus, resulting in the same conclusion I had before:
Edited by Golfmann14, 03 October 2012 - 03:03 AM.
#252
Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:22 AM
I love where this is going. To everyone else, I'm not trying to derail this thread into a math debate.You are correct. Rainbow Dash is 120% cool. If any regular pony is Less than or equal to 100% cool, Rainbow Dash is at least 20% cooler. So if Rainbow is what she says gains 2% more coolness each second over the span of 10 seconds, she ultimately results in 1.20 meaning 120% or 20% cooler than any other pony.
Thus, resulting in the same conclusion I had before:
Now that is where you are wrong, my friend. Let me illustrate it for you.So if Rainbow is what she says gains 2% more coolness each second over the span of 10 seconds, she ultimately results in 1.20 meaning 120% or 20% cooler than any other pony.
Imagine Rainbow Dash with 100 units of coolness (just deal with my imagination). You are claiming that she is 20% in ten seconds flat, which is 120 units, which is totally correct. Now you are claiming 2% cooler every second that passes. So if rainbow dash gets 2% cooler the first second, you would get 102 units of coolness. Now what about the second second? She likewise gets 2% cooler, so 102 + 2% = 104.04. Now if we continue like this for ten seconds...
1s = 102
2s = 104.04
3s = 106.1208
4s = 108.234316
5s = 110.4080803
6s = 112.6162419
7s = 114.8685668
8s = 117.1659381
9s = 119.5092569
10s = 121.899442
Note that my calculator will only go so far in the decimals.
Now we subtract what we get from 10s by original amount and we get...
21.899442 more units of coolness... Which if we convert it to percentage against 100 units of coolness, it would not be 20% cooler.
...
...

...
Now, back on topic: Oh wait, that was my shenanigans.
Edited by WonderDash, 03 October 2012 - 03:38 AM.
#253
Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:49 AM
I don't want to derail it but one does not simply add 2%. Look at it in a proportion. .20 /10 seconds. Ok correct so far. So there is .20 coolness or (20%) in no more or less than exactly ten seconds. Now reduce that to simplest from and you get .02/1 which is .02 coolness (2%) in a span of 1 second.I love where this is going. To everyone else, I'm not trying to derail this thread into a math debate.
Now that is where you are wrong, my friend. Let me illustrate it for you.
Imagine Rainbow Dash 100 units of coolness (just deal with my imagination). You are claiming that she is 20% in ten seconds flat, which is 120 units, which is totally correct. Now you are claiming 2% cooler every second that passes. So if rainbow dash gets 2% cooler the first second, you would get 102 units of coolness. Now what about the second second? She likewise gets 2% cooler, so 102 + 2% = 104.04. Now if we continue like this for ten seconds...
1s = 102
2s = 104.04
3s = 106.1208
4s = 108.234316
5s = 110.4080803
6s = 112.6162419
7s = 114.8685668
8s = 117.1659381
9s = 119.5092569
10s = 121.899442
Note that my calculator will only go so far in the decimals.
Now we subtract what we get from 10s by original amount and we get...
21.899442 more units of coolness... Which if we convert it to percentage against 100 units of coolness, it would not be 20% cooler.
...
...
...
Now, back on topic: Oh wait, that was my shenanigans.
What you are doing is taking 2% OF 102 and adding that onto itself. Which is in fact 2.04 and the result you got : 104.04 but what you are basically doing is just saying that 20% OF 102 is 20.4 and so on.
What My title is stating, is a rate which is comprised of two different units in proportion with one another. Whilst your examples are not proportional and thus have no discernible pattern.
Also consider the example Mph or Kph. If your rate of speed is 60 miles or kilometers per hour, you will go 60 miles or kilometers in exactly one hour, theoretically.
Rd's rate of coolness is 2% every second, 20% every 10 seconds, and 200% in 100 seconds, theoretically.
See my point?
Edited by Golfmann14, 03 October 2012 - 03:50 AM.
#254
Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:54 AM
Alright, I see what you are saying, but that doesn't match your title. What your logic is saying 2% of the ORIGINAL AMOUNT (100 units of coolness from the previous example). So, yes, 2% more of original amount = 2 units per second, therefore 10 seconds = 20% more units. Your title is saying 2% coolER, which states you get 2% more cooler from the previous second. If you somehow said you get 2% cool of original amount, then it would be valid.I don't want to derail it but one does not simply add 2%. Look at it in a proportion. .20 /10 seconds. Ok correct so far. So there is .20 coolness or (20%) in no more or less than exactly ten seconds. Now reduce that to simplest from and you get .02/1 which is .02 coolness (2%) in a span of 1 second.
What you are doing is taking 2% OF 102 and adding that onto itself. Which is in fact 2.04 and the result you got : 104.04 but what you are basically doing is just saying that 20% OF 102 is 20.4 and so on.
What My title is stating, is a rate which is comprised of two different units in proportion with one another. Whilst your examples are not proportional and thus have no discernible pattern.
Also consider the example Mph or Kph. If your rate of speed is 60 miles or kilometers per hour, you will go 60 miles or kilometers in exactly one hour, theoretically.
Rd's rate of coolness is 2% every second, 20% every 10 seconds, and 200% in 100 seconds, theoretically.
See my point?
#255
Posted 03 October 2012 - 12:54 PM
OT- I was never big on ASCII text stuff.
#256
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:05 PM
#257
Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:13 PM
Creepy pyro...
Edited by Thunder Strike, 03 October 2012 - 01:13 PM.
#258
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:42 PM
#259
Posted 03 October 2012 - 06:38 PM
#260
Posted 03 October 2012 - 06:59 PM
#261
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:01 PM

Heh... I like owlsss!
#262
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:02 PM
Edited by Blazer, 03 October 2012 - 07:02 PM.
#263
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:04 PM
#264
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:05 PM
You aren't that big a badass...
............................
What must I do to make you believe of my badassery?
#265
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:13 PM
To prove it, you must put a picture here, if you have muscles, a mustache, crocodile skin hat, wear shorts, don't wear a shirt, and basically look like Saxton Hale, you're the official australian badass.
#266
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:14 PM
#267
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:59 PM
#268
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:12 PM
That was my shenanigans to golf's title. XDJESUS guys, ON TOPIC! I like this talk, but for the love of frig try?
OT- I was never big on ASCII text stuff.
Anyway...
PYRO!
Edited by WonderDash, 03 October 2012 - 08:13 PM.
#269
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:17 PM

... Stay away from my table man..... STAY AWAY FROM ME!
Edited by Metallic Owl, 03 October 2012 - 08:17 PM.
#270
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:37 PM
#271
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:42 PM
Well I'd be damned, you certainly have frozen something in the fridge.. The machine designed to freeze stuff... Well done.
#272
Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:30 AM
#273
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:36 AM
#274
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:39 AM
#275
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:50 AM
#276
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:51 AM
#277
Posted 04 October 2012 - 03:13 AM
#278
Posted 04 October 2012 - 04:18 AM
#279
Posted 04 October 2012 - 04:34 AM
#280
Posted 04 October 2012 - 04:35 AM
Edited by AcidRain, 04 October 2012 - 04:36 AM.
#281
Posted 04 October 2012 - 04:38 AM
#282
Posted 05 October 2012 - 01:27 AM
#283
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:05 AM
#284
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:05 AM
#285
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:07 AM
#286
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:09 AM
k?
#287
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:10 AM
#288
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:14 AM
#289
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:33 AM
Edited by Jasplosion, 05 October 2012 - 03:34 AM.
#290
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:39 AM
#291
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:40 AM
#292
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:51 AM
#293
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:53 AM
#294
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:59 AM
#295
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:00 AM
#296
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:22 AM
#297
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:27 AM
#298
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:41 AM
I can't read it if it is in my stomachso... if i read fifty shades of gray....
Derpy is so not overrated
#299
Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:44 AM
Twilight will kill you.
#300
Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:45 AM
Edited by Senator Lemonsnout, 05 October 2012 - 05:45 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



