The only mobs that should be able to be disguised as would be passive. Say a cow, pig, wolf and such. There would be no real way this command would be abused, so I see no real harm behind it.
It can't be only coded for RP channels, but it CAN remain only in brohoof. So considering brohoof is mostly people building, exploring and chatting I don't really see any harm in someone disguising as a mob. Of course, just add a nameplate above so it's possible to tell who that user is.
Yes that is true but thule did not state whether it was brohoof or col, I was saying it would be abusive if he meant col, which im thinking he was since it is in the colonizations sub forum.
That's fair. But in that case, is it possible to keep nameplates for disguises on the main server to avoid confusion?
I believe he is meaning for col, it is in colonizations sub forum.
Nonono, give me an example of how it could be abused. Someone on the run from a ban using disguise to run from the law? Someone pulling a prank? I mean of course people will use it out of RP, but there's no real harm in that. If it's such a risky idea, test the waters by allowing only builders to use it or something.
Abuse, that means in this situation using it outside of RP squint, which Im thinking many people may do, then again I am not 100% certain of others intentions, They could use it when they arent changeling to change to different mobs to spy on people which is what changelings do, and if im correct the /dis command turns you into the mob now, not just replaces the look, so unicorns could do /dis bat, and start flying.
And as many people have been saying only let builders use it, I find that unfair cause me and alot of other whitemanes are on col that are responsible to use it so I think it should be free to all who use col, if it was put into effect.
Edited by Mystic, 14 July 2015 - 01:19 AM.