Naming (and semantics) of relatedLink and significantLink #875

Open
dmejia opened this Issue Nov 6, 2015 · 0 comments

1 participant

@dmejia

http://schema.org/WebPage supports relatedLink and significantLink which are both of type URL. I don't see, however, the concept of links used anywhere else, and the naming is usually *Url. Moreover, to be more precise semantically shouldn't the relationship be between web pages? Basically a WebPage can be related to other pages or link to other pages, so instead we could have something like

relatedPage and significantSubPage or significantLinkedPage (of type URL or WebPage).

(Practically you could then provide additional information about the linked pages beyond the URL).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment