
| Icehawk #347470 11 months ago |
Fixed by the artist, now with 20% less giant snatch :) |
| -flood- #347482 11 months ago |
Nice.
Not too much and not too little. And damn her face still gets me. |
| StreakTheFox #347488 11 months ago |
![]() |
| Edef #347534 11 months ago |
This is nudity, not porn. Tag as such. |
| pervotron3000 #347552 11 months ago |
The whole dripping wet part ain't porn? |
| AdrianBrony #347589 11 months ago |
#347534
depends, it's nudity, but she is aroused and presenting in a sexual context. non-porn nudity is like artistic nude or medical style diagram. |
| Icehawk #347628 11 months ago |
Pretty sure I had tagged it as both nudity and porn because it seems pretty clearly porn with the context of the image. lol, "artistic nudes" are not normally dripping and presenting themselves so sexually. |
| DashApples #347641 11 months ago |
The other version seems more natural. |
| Edef #347856 11 months ago |
Irrelevant. Nudity is showing off, porn is when penetration or such occurs. |
| StalkerZHS #347905 11 months ago |
ive never jacked off to any kinda "cute porn" EVER
thats going to change |
| Icehawk #348888 11 months ago |
....Ok, so apparently Edef has never heard of softcore pornography before. |
| Edef #348923 11 months ago |
It's just how the tags work bro. |
| Icehawk #348935 11 months ago |
This websites definition porn for tag rules is simply, "Anything overtly sexual is occurring on screen" that is incredibly vague and it says nothing about requiring penetration as you are claiming, perhaps you should add that to the porn tag rule? |
| Edef #351385 11 months ago |
This is how it's been running since the rule change. Leave it alone. |
| Rick132500 #708854 7 months ago |
No |