Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Tacoworld501
#233139
1 year ago
Such an awful game, not even ponies can redeem it.
Sparky
#233146
1 year ago
^That's why she's like: "Why the fuck am I on the cover for this?"
Dark_Horst
#233166
1 year ago
c&c4: the biggest "fuck you" to the gaming community in general and specifically any fan of the epic and historical series that was ever said
Kawa
#233167
1 year ago
+1 for the pun.
Ssargon
#233191
1 year ago
Ahh, snarky Twilight. You make those words bearable to look at.
Anonymous
#233272
1 year ago
I'd say FUND IT, but it sounds like the original game was turrible. Was C&C3 at least okay? (Those are the only two I haven't played.)
Anonymous
#233288
1 year ago
^
Personally, I think C&C3 pulled the trigger, C&C4 just desecrates an already dead corpse.
Anonymous
#233818
1 year ago
@233272

Red Alert 3 and C&C3 were okay.jpg

C&C4 was nope.jpg
Psychroculus
#234243
1 year ago
Worse is that there are rumors that EA is going to make another CnC game, again.
Ssargon
#236778
1 year ago
C&C3 and RA3 are made by their mods. Hell, RA3 even has a [at least partially] brony mod team. C&C4 is practically an MMO, so one of the best things about the C&C series goes down the tubes with it.
proprotagonist
#240479
1 year ago
if they do make a new CnC game, i want it to be generals 2. they already stuck their dick up the tiberian series, and cockslapped the red alert series. at least try and redeem yoursleves a little EA. just a little.
Anonymous
#270041
1 year ago
C&C3 was awesome. RA3 was awesome only in its soundtrack and cast (although not story and dialogue). C&C4 was terrible.
arkher
#1116578
4 months ago
Comaned and Conquer?