
| Anonymous #66815 1 year ago |
This is extremely creative and I could see it as an actual magic card good job whoever made it! |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #66826 1 year ago |
Thank you. :) |
| MythicDawn #66868 1 year ago |
More please? It's always nice to see professional looking custom MTG cards. |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #66954 1 year ago |
I've got a few new cards in the works, but they aren't presentable yet.
In the meantime, I'll sporadically update some of the clunkier cards I posted back then with cleaner versions. And thank you - it's always nice to read some positive feedback. ;) |
| Anonymous #67034 1 year ago |
Shouldn't she be Planeswalker -- Luna ?
She's the same character as Luna and it would be weirder to have Luna's type be Planeswalker -- Nightmare Moon if she ever gets made into a card, also, I think Planeswalker subtypes are always single-word. |
| Anonymous #67039 1 year ago |
Good combination of blue and black abilities on a dual-colored planeswalker. I approve. (for the un-initiated, first ability is pure black, second is pure blue, last is both). |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #67041 1 year ago |
Good point. I saw "Luna" as a creature, but there's no reason she can't be both. |
| Kriegs #67100 1 year ago |
...yeah, I can see this being useful. Pity I'm so awful at blue. |
| Anonymous #67116 1 year ago |
this is the best of the magic cards yet. balanced, interesting and very thematic. This brony approves and would build a deck around her. |
| Anonymous #68086 1 year ago |
"She's the same character as Luna and it would be weirder to have Luna's type be Planeswalker -- Nightmare Moon if she ever gets made into a card, also, I think Planeswalker subtypes are always single-word."
Actually, ALL subtypes are single words. The current version has two subtypes: "Nightmare" and "Moon" That said, this is a little ridiculous. Destroy a land, destroy a creature, use her ultimate. You just stole all of your opponent's lands and creatures. Seems a little*too* powerful, even for a planeswalker. |
| Anonymous #68704 1 year ago |
^The wording of the card means that the target opponent chooses which card to sacrifice. So unless everything else they have is black, no one would sac a land to a card like this in the first place. |
| Anonymous #68756 1 year ago |
This is pretty awesome.
Anon5, they get to pick what permanent to sacrifice, so it's not as broken as you think. In fact, if you play against a deck with only lands and creatures as permanents, after you smack those two types then she can't get any more loyalty until they play another land/creature --- so if she's lost any loyalty, you can't use her ultimate. You could always hit yourself if you have other types though. Still, maybe might want to stick "nonland" in front of that first ability (although playtesting first would be good); seconding Luna subtype... 0-cost ability feels almost too strong... until the beginning of your next turn, maybe? or tap it first? Also fun with enemy planeswalkers -- mine now! Bolas just destroyed them, this is much more fun... |
| Anonymous #71568 1 year ago |
I target myself. I sac a land. Now all lands are Black. This is a problem. |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #78379 1 year ago |
Most ultimates are pretty much "I win" abilities... |
| Anonymous #156535 1 year ago |
Changes I would make:
1 - The obvious subtype change: Planeswalker -- Luna. 2 - Reword her +1 ability to say "Target player sacrifices a nonblack permanent. Permanents that player controls that share a card type with the sacrificed card become black. This effect lasts indefinitely" That fixes the type conflict on the card. 3 - Her ultimate should probably only target opponents, as there are only a few circumstances (though more likely only 1) where the effect as printed would do more than nothing - and that's just poor designing. Far as I can see, the +0 ability is to allow players to do something with her while she can't use her +1, so it's actually set up perfectly. Could be nonland permanents, though. |