
| Anonymous #521983 9 months ago |
These were stupid before and they're stupid now. |
| Anonymous #522003 9 months ago |
yes, they I agree. |
| Anonymous #522008 9 months ago |
Ah, crap. I meant to say "yes, they are", then I changed my mind to "I agree."
Headcanon isn't really... "valid" unless it's written by the creators themselves. A better term would be "headfanon." |
| dudemang #522020 9 months ago |
Headcanon refers to the canon inside one's head which is true to a single person. I like to think of it as the singular of "fanon", which is group-oriented and thus will have uncertainty and disagreement, whereas a "headcanon" will probably be binary - you either believe it or no.
Though I agree that most of these aren't really all that worthwhile. MY LITTLE PONY SECRETLY PROMOTES RACISM, GAIS. |
| Anonymous #522022 9 months ago |
^It's a little redundant. The head part already implies it's made-up |
| Anonymous #522024 9 months ago |
ninja'd |
| DeeperMadness #522043 9 months ago |
Wouldn't calling him "Pony" be the same as referring to him as "Bloke" if he were human? So, "my mate, Joe", "Top Bloke Joe" or even: "Hey, Joe. You all right, dude?" but suited for pony use. |
| LordBristle #522052 9 months ago |
LookatallthefucksIgive.jpg |
| Anonymous #522067 9 months ago |
Ere' mait, jes bumme nutta java, ye? |
| Anonymous #522070 9 months ago |
^^^ It's more like Nigger Jim. |
| Anonymous #522083 9 months ago |
![]() |
| Dragon_Tosser #522504 9 months ago |
considering ponies are miniature horses, I'd think it'd be the equivalent of calling him "Midget Joe" in human terms. |
| Anonymous #524031 9 months ago |
this shit is stupid and you should feel stupid |
| Anonymous #525549 9 months ago |
Please don't vandalize the tags of things perfectly allowed by the rules just because you don't personally like them. |