
| Glord #551190 9 months ago |
Anyone know of an image with Lyra/Bonbon/both saying Fuck You? |
| Anonymous #551192 9 months ago |
The first ponies were Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! |
| Naruto2-point0 #551198 9 months ago |
Troll griffy? This is a first, for me anyways |
| Glord #551199 9 months ago |
|
| Glord #551200 9 months ago |
You rang? |
| DeeperMadness #551205 9 months ago |
@Glord:
Will Apple Bloom do? Seriously though, do we really need to keep having a pop at this bloke? |
| Scumbag_Crowley #551211 9 months ago |
@anon: inb4 "Actually the first ponies were Celestia and Luna" |
| Anonymous #551220 9 months ago |
@#192
Eeyup |
| Erroneous #551224 9 months ago |
I'm MC homophobic fucking asshole,
being gay is evil and it is unnatural, Jesus said to love thy, neighbour, but only if they're straight, Penises go in vaginas, everything else is just insane! |
| Anonymous #551225 9 months ago |
Guys, calm down.
Your acting like idiots. |
| Glord #551228 9 months ago |
Scumbag_Crowley raises a valid point.
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW??? |
| Glord #551231 9 months ago |
I have an excuse.
Dark Souls has deteriorated my brain matter. |
| Anonymous #551234 9 months ago |
#225
Troll harder |
| Anonymous #551238 9 months ago |
exploitable damn you damn you |
| Jackarunda #551248 9 months ago |
--> right message
--> wrong way to go about it |
| Roxxas #551256 9 months ago |
BRILLIANT!!
also @ Scumbag WoG says Celly and Woona have/had a mother and father. |
| Lance #551257 9 months ago |
wait wait wait
why the fuck are we giving him attention? we're increasing his popularity, even if it is to make fun of him There's no such thing as "bad" attention, remember? |
| TBTabby #551263 9 months ago |
We should give him his own church that protests guard pony funerals. |
| Glord #551264 9 months ago |
Fuck, Lance is right.
EVERPONY STOP POSTING THIS CRAP |
| Anonymous #551269 9 months ago |
@Jackarunda
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to say there. |
| Gentle_Coltte_of_Leisure #551275 9 months ago |
Glord, you've stumbled upon the paradox of the internet. We know it's wrong, and yet it won't stop. The dominoes are falling now, are you a bad enough dude to change fate? |
| Glord #551276 9 months ago |
Also, is everyone so busy arguing on these images that no one is uploading anything new?
I need to go scan my Fluttershy Littlebigplanet sketch and put it up here. |
| Glord #551281 9 months ago |
@Gentle_Coltte
Maybe if I had a time machine, to make this guy never like FiM. So I guess I'm not. I am a bad enough dude to make the Iron Golem in Dark Souls jump off the tower you fight it on though. |
| Jackarunda #551288 9 months ago |
"We know it's wrong, and yet it won't stop."
Story of humanity. Also, you're right. I'm dropping ALL of this right now and I'm going to go draw Derpy golfing. Because lol you guys can't hope to piss me off (I've yet to discover this kind of "courage" IRL). Expect a pic by tonight. |
| Glord #551291 9 months ago |
I'm with Jack.
Ladies, Gentlecolts. I wash my hands of this idiocy. |
| Doctor_Whooves #551307 9 months ago |
#551248: Not the right message at all. Anyway, wouldn't animals getting married be sacrilege or some kind of bullshit like that? The only reason anyone could possibly be against same-sex marriage is if they were a religious nut and felt it was the government's job to enforce their religious beliefs on the entire population. At least that's the only reason I'm willing to pardon, since I don't hold nuts responsible for any silliness they produce. Anyone with any other reason is just being a douche, and sticking their nose where it doesn't belong.
Anyway, I'd think God (as portrayed in those wonderfully family-friendly tomes that've been in circulation the past few thousand years) would be pretty pissed off if animals started getting married, whether it was a hetero marriage or not. Anyone who's a proper religious nut should be against animals getting married, or else you're just an embarrassment to the nut community. |
| Anonymous #551336 9 months ago |
Okay, do we have an actual concrete statement about homophobia from the guy? All I got is that there are "some pairings he doesn't approve of." He probably is referring to same-sex pairings, but that was never really *explicitly* stated... |
| BronythePony #551354 9 months ago |
On National coming out day too. Ouch =P |
| HeinousActsZX #551381 9 months ago |
...I really shouldn't post here... |
| Anonymous #551391 9 months ago |
are we done with this yet? |
| Sonlir #551418 9 months ago |
Marriage from a religious (Christian) point of view REQUIRES a male and female.
Two males or two females just won't cut it... Noone said they cannnot form a formal partnership (and in post civilized countries they can). And then theres the thing with adopting children but that's a thing for an entirely different shitstorm. |
| coolgame17 #551452 9 months ago |
How this discussion should end... |
| Doctor_Whooves #551456 9 months ago |
@Sonlir: There's the religious idea of marriage, and then there's civil marriage licenses and the rights/privileges/responsibilities that go along with it. As an Atheist, I can go to a court or city hall or wherever and get married any time I please... MARRIED... ME, an Atheist. I'm sorry, but marriage isn't the exclusive property of religion. If I, as an atheist, can get married (not that I want to), so too should a same-sex couple be able to get married. Religion has nothing to do with it.
But even then, not everyone has the same interpretation of Christianity. It's arrogant presumption to think yours is the only (or best) interpretation; particularly when it infringes on the ability of other people to lives their lives as they see fit. Canada has allowed same-sex marriage for many years now, so anyone can have a civil marriage ceremony. Whether a church will perform a same-sex ceremony is left up to each particular church, but I can tell you right now that there are churches up here that perform these ceremonies. Want to know another thing? It's those churches which will be the ones that survive any appreciable length of time. |
| Anonymous #551479 9 months ago |
Marriage between the same sex is allowed according to some versions of christianity. And non religious civil unions that people enter into when they go to the courthouse to get married is still generally considered a "marriage" by the people who do them.
Marriage isn't religious nowadays, it's a formal acknowledgement of commitment between two people. One that many people try to restrict to heterosexual couples. |
| Draconaes #551482 9 months ago |
@Doctor_Whooves
Yeah, what he said. |
| Anonymous #551484 9 months ago |
Personally, I believe that marriage should stay between male and female, but it should absolutely be legal for a partnership between two homosexuals.
Denying stuff like insurance and all of that hub bub just because a couple cannot marry is ridiculous. |
| AshesOfSaturn #551504 9 months ago |
Both our diets, I should mention, are completely vegetarian. We all eat hay and oats. Why be at each other's throats? |
| Anonymous #551514 9 months ago |
^If a man and a man or a woman and a woman have all the rights of a married couple in the eyes of the law then what problem is there in calling what they are married? |
| HeinousActsZX #551547 9 months ago |
I don't know if any of you are actually anti-gay, but if you are, read this and tell me, tell everyone, that that's what you want. |
| Sonlir #551564 9 months ago |
@Doctor_Whooves
You have a very odd perception of religion. Sure the bible can be interpreted in many ways but the bits about marriage are somewhat clear. x + y is ok x + x and y + y are not. And if you don't like it then take a civil marriage of form a partnership. Also... any church that labels itself a Christian and gives out gay marriages are either blinded by money or just lacks a spine. Possibly both. |
| Anonymous #551574 9 months ago |
as far as I'm concerned the government should never have started giving out marriage licenses in the first place. marriage is a cultural and/or religious construct which varies depending on the culture and/or religion - and as soon as the government starts supporting marriage at all, it has to make the decision of which culture and/or religion gets to decide what the word means.
make something called a civil union. everyone gets that. straight couples, gay couples, even two people who aren't romantically involved at all but want the benefits of a joint household. leave defining "marriage" up to the culture of the people getting married. done. |
| Anonymous #551585 9 months ago |
Who the heck is OHMURR and how come I haven't seen him say anything so far? Also why did someone bother to make a good picture about him. |
| Anonymous #551599 9 months ago |
dumb image
dumber argument none of us know what the shit we're talking about and a fandom site is the worst possible venue for it if it was up to me this thread would already be nuked |
| Anonymous #551645 9 months ago |
^
the only truth in this thread This thread seemed to be heading in an enlightened direction, but then it became a religious head-up-the-ass discussion and I realized how ignorant some bronies can be. |
| ryebread #551707 9 months ago |
@551192
Actually Lilith, Adam and Eve! |
| Doctor_Whooves #551735 9 months ago |
#551564: Or they recognize that the world changes, and in order to survive, usually it's necessary to change with it. There are many other religious practices, both in Christianity and other faiths, which have fallen by the wayside over the centuries because they simply no longer "fit" in what society had become. It's human nature to resist change (especially positive change, in looking through our history), but change is inevitable. This is no different. Life is constant change, not stagnation. Any real God would know that, which is one of the reasons why I'm of the opinion that if there is a being that created this Universe, it's nothing at all like any human religion has ever described.
The Bible contains many good lessons, some beautiful language, and certainly it never seems to cease being an interesting study for people focusing on literature. But it was written by people. People from a different age, to boot. People as flawed as any of us, subject to the prejudices and mindsets of their own time. If someone wants to live their life according to the dictates of those who've been dead for so long, writing about what they believed God wants... a God that may or may not even exist for all we'll ever know... well, that's their right. But to try and enforce those dictates on others? That's both futile and against the spirit of religion in the first place; and will fail time and time again. Maybe I do have an odd perception of religion, but IMO religion exists primarily to comfort those who need it. It shouldn't be about providing an absolute guide for morality (which doesn't, and never will exist) that everyone on Earth should follow or be made to follow (or else); but rather a source of strength, or community, or inspiration to better oneself and treat others with dignity and respect. Not because you're afraid God will roast you if you don't follow a well-defined list of rules (made up by your fellow, flawed primates); but because it makes this world a somewhat better place than it was yesterday. Denying people the right to live their lives the way they choose on so fundamental a level as refusing to grant their relationships equality does nothing but suck just a little bit more of the life out of our society. |
| Anonymous #551744 9 months ago |
@whoof: the problem with "the world changes" as an argument here is at least in christian tradition, the world - and the practices of a given age - aren't supposed to be allowed to mess with moral right and wrong.
@sonlir: it's not necessarily money or spinelessness. it's possible they just interpret jesus's smackdown of the levitical cleanliness laws as being a more general indictment of the trustworthiness of leviticus as the authentic law of god. since, y'know, if leviticus is trustworthy then how did "mere human precepts" sneak into it? at which point, what do you get? laws which may or may not be mere human precepts, which list gay (male on male) sex (not marriage) as a stoning offense. if that's authentic law-of-god, why? if the whole law comes down to "love god with all of your being, and love your neighbor as yourself", what is this rule for? why can't we know what harm it does, or the reason it's so offensive to him? what's marriage for? is it an enshrinement of love? as far as anyone on earth can tell, it's the same emotion. what's marriage for? is it to raise a family? what about a woman who had ovarian cancer and had to get them removed? is she unfit to wed? what about people who are intersex - who for reason x or y don't have their bits in a "normal" male or female configuration? or who have male bits and female genes, or vice versa? they exist. what are the rules? if this is authentic law-of-god, how the fuck are we supposed to interpret it? |
| Anonymous #551755 9 months ago |
@whooves: as an addendum, I've never considered the carrot of heaven or the stick of hell to be a good reason for a person who believes in the christian god to do what that god wants that person to do. a better reason: if god is as christian doctrine portrays him, he loves us and wants the best for us. doesn't that mean we should follow his advice?
like that. of course, figuring out, "what does he want" immediately gets entangled in this kind of argument. that said, if you don't believe in the christian god then all of this is probably irrelevant to you. so... yeah. just trying to explain why it's a little more complicated from this side of the fence. |
| Anonymous #551792 9 months ago |
>This whole post/thread/comments |
| Anonymous #551851 9 months ago |
WHY SHOULD I LISTEN TO A GODDAMN SNIIIPE? |
| Anonymous #552579 9 months ago |
I believe we should all live by the fucking wise ass words of Benito Juarez. "Among individuals as among nations, the respect to other people's rights and beliefs is peace.”
There is no reason to knock on a persons way of life you cause you disagree with them. If they found something that works for them then who am I to judge them? |
| Anonymous #553656 9 months ago |
Lyra and BonBon beg to differ
![]() |
| Anonymous #1122883 4 months ago |
Did Sunlight1236 or SiliconGlass make this! |