
| Anonymous #28276 1 year ago |
A furry responding to the inundation of furry websites with pony-related art.
Eeyup. |
| Anonymous #28278 1 year ago |
WTF is with this pic? |
| Anonymous #28285 1 year ago |
I don't get it |
| Anonymous #28289 1 year ago |
^
"A furry responding to the inundation of furry websites with pony-related art." |
| Anonymous #28291 1 year ago |
furries: possibly retarded? More at 11. |
| Anonymous #28299 1 year ago |
None can resist the sheer power of friendship! Today, the furries and trolls, tomorrow, THE WORLD!!
*Ominous Lightning* |
| Anonymous #28304 1 year ago |
M.Bison: OF COURSE! |
| Anonymous #28311 1 year ago |
Yes my brony bretheren destroy those furfags one by one |
| Anonymous #28316 1 year ago |
MLP FIB: Cute design, great voice acting, great stories, Catchy music, a really professional work that can be enjoyed by everyone.
Furry comics: ........ nope. |
| Anonymous #28326 1 year ago |
I just love Pinkie's expression |
| Anonymous #28329 1 year ago |
^
^ ^ You do realize that a lot of Bronies ARE furries, right? |
| ModernWarmare #28333 1 year ago |
I love that Nazi regalia. Furries need no excuse to drop the fursecution bomb, even when it makes no goddamn sense. |
| Anonymous #28335 1 year ago |
Yes, many bronies are furries. But most are not. And many furries hate MLP, because they are drama queens and have to stir up shit everywhere they go. |
| Anonymous #28336 1 year ago |
My favorite thing about this pic is Fluttershy trying to wear the armband. D'aaaaaw. |
| Anonymous #28337 1 year ago |
^ couldn't have said it better.
Also, SOME furry comics have nice stuff inside. Not many, granted, but some. Of course, no comic, furry or otherwise, can have great voice acting or catchy music... You know, it's a limit of drawn art. Sad, but true. ^ ^ |
| Anonymous #28339 1 year ago |
^ damn, my post was supposed to comment on the one above the "nazi regalia" one.
Comments add up so fast... |
| Anonymous #28340 1 year ago |
Warmare: the furry in question draws himself as a Nazi. No "fursecution" involved...but hey, whatever floats yer boat... *eyeroll* |
| Anonymous #28342 1 year ago |
I for one intend to love and tolerate the SHIT out of these furry bronies. |
| Anonymous #28343 1 year ago |
Usagi Yojimbo is pretty much the only furry comic that has show some quality in content and presentation. |
| Anonymous #28357 1 year ago |
there's a lot of talented furry artists out there. few of them seem to do comics unfortunately. |
| Anonymous #28362 1 year ago |
Yeah, Usagi Yojimbo, Fred Perry, Albedo - the only good anthro comics I remember. Then came the fucking furries... |
| Anonymous #28373 1 year ago |
^dude, all of those comics were drawn by furries. Some of the first furries. Stan Sakai was a longstanding member of "Rowrbrazzle", the first furry APAzine, fer crissake.
Hell, Albedo triggered the first "furry parties" at San Diego ComiCon. And Fred Perry's been drawing furries (and a guest of honor at furry conventions) for ages. Talk about denial, sheesh. |
| Anonymous #28376 1 year ago |
Seems like "furry" to a lot of people means "art with anthropomorphic animals, as long as I hate it, because if it's good, I don't want it to be called furry". |
| Anonymous #28380 1 year ago |
Yeah but those comics are quite old, the lack of new titles, artist and ideas is what gives the furry community bad reputation. |
| Anonymous #28396 1 year ago |
^^^ My point is more back that then the furry stigma didn't exist. Hell, I didn't hear the term 'furry' until much later. There was a lack of fursonas and Doug Winger-esque art, no "Fuck you I'm a dragon". It was a gentler time, a more innocent time. I miss it. |
| Anonymous #28430 1 year ago |
^ you and me both, man. |
| Anonymous #28435 1 year ago |
Sorry, furry artist. No six boobed fox centaurs with three foot long penises (that art exists, haunts me and is what I think of when I think of furries). The only thing on the menu is PONIES. |
| Anonymous #28456 1 year ago |
^ Yeah, that seems to be why he drew ponies.
^^^ Also, good points all. |
| Anonymous #28606 1 year ago |
oh i was wondering why there were nazi symbols in the picture. so furrys like to compare general dislike/intrusion on their turf/whatever the fuck to nazi germany. sounds completely rational and not at all an overreacting self martyring indulgence . neat.
i don't actually look at furry sites so i don't know these things i don't have any hate for furrys - whatever floats your boat man - but if i could make a suggestion, perhaps you guys should stop being so obnoxiously defensive about your fetish. we all have our kinks but I don't go shoving mine down people's throats at all opportunities in an passive aggressive plea to be considered normal. dang, that came out more venomous then intended. w/e. keep rocking the mike, everypony. |
| Anonymous #28634 1 year ago |
Yes we're screwed: furries like My Little Pony. |
| Anonymous #28841 1 year ago |
^KILL THEM WITH FIRE.
Then continue to befriend all the other trolls. |
| Anonymous #28899 1 year ago |
It's nice to know this message of love and tolerance among Bronies is complete Bullshit |
| Eco #28910 1 year ago |
I feel like people get way too hot and bothered about furry fandom |
| Eco #28911 1 year ago |
Possibly including some of the people in it |
| Anonymous #29040 1 year ago |
i'd brohoof a furry |
| Anonymous #29233 1 year ago |
The furry fandom is a fandom there is a difference between a fandom and a fetish. It's just annoying that as soon as there's even remotely ONE anthropomorphic character everyone seems to cry that the person who drew it is a fetishist. The only ones who are fetishists are the ones who draw and jack off to porn of non-existant characters.
Here's an example between a fan and a fetishist let's use the ponies to illustrate the point. If you draw a random pony character that does nothing out of the ordinary from normal poses to awesome/cool poses, does that make you a fan? Maybe. Do you made more than one (or maybe 5) of these pictures? Then obviously yeah your fan. But does having that many pictures make you a fetishist? NO, it does not. However if you draw the random pony in a sexy and seductive poses and situations, does that make you a fan? Yeah, mabye. Does that make you a fetishist? It's HEAVILY implied, but maybe not, you're probably the type of guy/girl who just enjoy mature rated jokes but not get off of them. But if you draw genitalia on that pony character when she normally isn't supposed to have that and gettin your "jollies" from that at the same time, does that make you a fetishist now? Why YES, yes it does you sick freak, especially if she's "doing it" with another character. That's what makes a fetishist. A normal fan is just a person who likes the character type and the characters of certain worlds/stories, like the ponies, Mickey Mouse and friends, and the Loony Toons. A fetishist just jacks off to porn of those characters. I'm just wondering now, has things gotten so bad for you guys that you've been slammed on jaded colored glasses into your brains that every single anthropomorphic character you see now is some sort of porn star when in fact there's a "chance" that it could be just a RANDOM CHARACTER that had never participated in porn at all and creator of said comic/picture is actually against porn. You kind of guys need to get your heads out of your butts and actually learn what tolerating actually means; unless you personally don't tolerate it, but that doesn't mean you can expect to say or insult something without getting a comeback or being pulled into an arguement. However that anon before Eco said is right you type of "bronies" are hypocrites. This whole situation with the "furry arguement" in the comments of this post reminds me of that one simple sketch comic about a random person dropping in a middle of a group and just said "furries" and then laughed as the entire group devolved into a wall of rage of the group fighting each other. If you guys honestly don't care about furry fandom then don't bring them up, but remember most of the fans are more tired about people grouping them in with the fetishists or some kinky thing when there really shouldn't be, there's a difference. In the end, this picture is really just another mention about how the ponies are taking over the world and the fandom. |
| Dignity #29701 1 year ago |
^tl;dr |
| Anonymous #30145 1 year ago |
to the anonymous that posted that long winded faggotry explanation:
what you said? stuff nobody cares about. also, you furries need to get the fuck out of our ponibooru. |
| Anonymous #30406 1 year ago |
The anon that posted that long explanation: No... |
| Anonymous #30480 1 year ago |
What's the difference between a brony and a furfag?
I've yet to see bronies dressing up in fursuits fucking each other. Although that one chick who cosplayed as Rainbow Dash...yeah I'd hit that like an earth penetrating warhead. |
| Anonymous #30516 1 year ago |
^ Give them time... |
| Anonymous #30558 1 year ago |
^
The anon that posted that long explanation: lol Pinkie said that line. ^_^ almost |
| Anonymous #42498 1 year ago |
For all the butthurt /b/tards: furries provide most of the art here.
Deal with it. You can't escape it. -:) |
| Anonymous #42511 1 year ago |
^ >furries provide most of the art here
So you've indexed every image by whether or not the creator is a furry? What is your criteria for defining an artist as a furry- is it at least one work readily identifiable as 'furry'? Does this include work for hire, in trade, or as gifts? |
| Anonymous #42538 1 year ago |
I would say that to define an artist as furry --- ask the artist. |
| Anonymous #42545 1 year ago |
So when will you be submitting your research for peer review? |
| Anonymous #138919 1 year ago |
Hey guys. Ponies are considered anthropomorphic, since they can talk and have human-like facial expressions. By quite a few definitions all bronies are in fact furries. |
| Anonymous #138926 1 year ago |
This is the same guy that drew the comic defending that moron Skywind.
Apparently he isn't even bothering to ponify himself in order to ship himself with a character, though. He'll just do her as a human. |
| Anonymous #138930 1 year ago |
^ Meant for >>18800 |