Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Mushi
#325633
1 year ago
no, that is a good answer XD
ToxiCookie
#325644
1 year ago
No. Because no.
Rarity is not a slut, get over it already >:(
marioandsonic
#325648
1 year ago
Pretty much, lol
Darkie
#325649
1 year ago
I liked her response.
Turnways_Flip
#325750
1 year ago
Do not randomly proposition ponies. The "sex" position is very similar to the "kick you in half" position.
AdrianBrony
#325754
1 year ago
#325750
plus, there's no guarantee there won't be accidental overlap of the two if the answer, by some twist of fate, is yes.
Anonymous
#325836
1 year ago
hahahaha... Pretty much a HELL NO...
Kooner
#325843
1 year ago
I like the first one xD
Jackarunda
#326092
1 year ago
Rarity is not a slut
Rainbow is not a lesbian
Pinkie is not a psychopath
Applejack is not an incest-pony
Fluttershy is not a transvestite
Twilight is not a rape victim of Celestia


Problem anons?
(lol jk)
Anonymous
#326327
1 year ago
Yes. I DO have a problem. The many-worlds-theory implies that all possible alternate histories and futures are real.
If you choose to believe it is true, then magical ponies exist in some parallel universe.
In that same line of thinking, somewhere
Rarity IS a slut
Rainbow IS a lesbian
Pinkie IS a psychopath
Applejack IS an incest-pony
Fluttershy IS a transvestite
Twilight IS a rape victim of Celestia.

In some universe, all of these may be true all at the same time.

Problem Jackarunda?
Strill
#326539
1 year ago
If Rarity isn't a slut then explain Sweetie Belle!
Sel3theFourth
#327075
1 year ago
@Strill
Freak of nature
Anonymous
#332049
11 months ago
Wait Jack.
Fluttershy transvestite? Where have I been to miss this?