Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#200432
1 year ago
Sure is hypocrite in here
Anonymous
#200434
1 year ago
IIIIIIIII wanna fuck a dog in the ass,
I wanna fuck a dog in the ass,
I wanna fuck a doooog
:D
Anonymous
#200435
1 year ago
ugh I should have rotated some of those heresy censors oh well
and in weaver's defense
"This is not serious and not intended as a supplement for actual debate

it is a joke about the issue, I feel if I don't say this explicitly people will get the wrong idea now"
yawg07
#200445
1 year ago
I lol'ed when I saw this on fimchan.
The lines are so perfectly 'Pinkie Pie' xD
MetalHooves
#200463
1 year ago
Oh lol, the truth is funny and painful.

Alright, here's my stance on it.

"Porn" should be allowed if it's tasteful and not extremely explicit, i/e depicting masturbation, intercourse, etc without censor. Succinctly, tasteful nudity/erotica is a-ok by me.

Mostly because if it wasn't I'd be up shit creek.
Anonymous
#200482
1 year ago
#200435 what issue? Furries brought dogfuckers to the fandom and everyone else hates them both.

Dogfuckers and furries like making terrible "joke" comics about it that present anyone complaining about their bestiality or furryness as hypocrites that like the opposite, completely missing the reality of the situation: you're both horrible perverts and drama whores and you should leave.
Anonymous
#200488
1 year ago
^ i propose a neverending orgy with everything and everyone! :D
Anonymous
#200489
1 year ago
Hahaha. Weaver is becoming one of my favourite poni artists.
Frisby
#200491
1 year ago
Chubby Pinkie is best Pinkie.
Calbeck
#200588
1 year ago
Houston, we're closing on our trajectory and standing by to roffle.
PynkyPy
#200593
1 year ago
Not being Egotistical here, but I can't help but think this was pointing at me specifically.
Kooner
#200630
1 year ago
That's my party hole... I lol'd when i saw this.
JackOfAllTrades
#200631
1 year ago
Where did all our love and tolerance go?
Jimmytrius
#200672
1 year ago
Gotta love the design of the EOoT :0

And about furry art... I don't mind it, but I don't like furry versions of ponies, either :$
Anonymous
#200708
1 year ago
@PynkyPy: It's not. But if you wanna post pics of your fun bags or party hole, we're not stopping you.
Trombe
#200732
1 year ago
THIS IS SO HERETICAL I DON'T KNOW WHOM TO SHOOT FIRST.
Anonymous
#200767
1 year ago
The drawing is so poor, it's difficult to tell whether the humanoid Pinkie is simply human, or one of those creepy anthro creations. If it's human, it's as acceptable as the G4 pony. If it's an anthro, then this picture states the truth and I see no hypocrisy... G4 ponies can be attractive; anthros can't. End of story.

And Pinky, the Universe doesn't revolve around you . For fuck's sake, get a grip on your egotist tendencies.
Anonymous
#200811
1 year ago
I think it's pretty obvious it's supposed to be anthro and not human, what with the face, legs, and ears.
Anonymous
#200862
1 year ago
Anon 767 you are a sad and shortsighted individual. I don't know whether it's worse to think you believe humans have digitigrade legs and tails or that the entire point of the issue is lost on you.
Anonymous
#200870
1 year ago
^ Have you seen some of the pics people have drawn that are supposedly of just plain, ordinary humans? Not all artists have a very good sense of human anatomy; and considering how crude The Weaver's work always is, it's a legitimate question.

As for the issue, I understand it perfectly. I simply disagree with you, which I consider to be a bonus. :P
Anonymous
#200899
1 year ago
Anon @200767, is it hard to reconcile your distaste of anthros with the fact you prefer ponies with horse pussies? Or do you not even concern yourself with issues like how REMOVING animal features makes something more abhorrent and disgusting?
I mean at what point do you see a problem when a sexualized animal-person is more indicative of bestiality than just a sexualized animal?
Anonymous
#200905
1 year ago
THIS IS ALL HERESY
Anonymous
#200910
1 year ago
^ Anthros don't "remove" animal features, they just move them around and alter them slightly.

Also, G4 MLP characters have little in common with real-world equines physically (aside from quadrupedalism), and absolutely nothing in common with them mentally or emotionally (and in this sense they're essentially human).

Also, I'm mystified as to what you consider "animal" features. Human beings are animals, as much as any other creature on this planet... as such, couldn't any of our features also be considered "animal". The only difference is that we're animals with sapience and abstract thought; a quality the MLP characters share.

But this has all been discussed elsewhere, so I see no further reason to discuss it again, here, with you.
Anonymous
#200947
1 year ago
>"Also, I'm mystified as to what you consider "animal" features. Human beings are animals, as much as any other creature on this planet... as such, couldn't any of our features also be considered "animal"."
It's not like it was obvious that he meant non-human animals, you pedantic chucklefuck.
I can only imagine this guy leaning back in his greasy chair with a smug grin, nodding slowly to himself after hitting post. "Animals, huh? Humans ARE animals. Sure told HIM," he grins with a satisfied nod before helping himself to another well-earned fistful of funyuns.
Anonymous
#200970
1 year ago
^ It's a meaningless difference. A creature's physical form is irrelevant; only the mind really matters in the end. There's nothing greatly different about human features than those of any other animal, aside from the fact they're the most familiar to us, and we tend to associate them with the only intelligent beings we've ever known. Had humanity evolved on this world side-by-side with a non-human creature of equal intelligence, this idea you're so fixated on wouldn't even exist. It's built entirely on individual perception, rather than anything truly concrete or absolute.

Since it's obvious you're the same anon as above, I see no further reason to waste my time replying to you.

At least I, unlike you, am willing to tolerate others. I also don't waste my time raging about things on the internet I find objectionable, which is about the most pathetic activity a person can partake in.
Southern_Hospitality
#200987
1 year ago
Wow, sure is flank-hurt in here.
Anonymous
#200989
1 year ago
PLOTHOLES!
Anonymous
#201079
1 year ago
>A creature's physical form is irrelevant
That's what the entire apple-buckin' discussion is ABOUT.
Isshiki_Kotonashi
#201113
1 year ago
OH HI DOUCHEBAGS
I'M OVER HERE IN THE NOT GIVING A SHIT SECTION
LERN2APATHY
Anonymous
#201182
1 year ago
PynkyPy
#200593
4 hours ago Not being Egotistical here

yes you are.
K_thanks
#204401
1 year ago
I dont care about that anthro furry human bla bla stuff.
I just hate mlp Porn
assaholic
#236445
1 year ago
lmao this is some shit
Anonymous
#254940
1 year ago
^ Anon rambling that "anthro" can't be sexy but the Ponies can be.

You're an idiot, sugar cube. Anthro is short for "anthropomorphic" which means "Animal with human characteristics" Guess what? Talking is a human characteristic and makes the ponies ANTHROS.

Moron.
Anonymous
#389939
11 months ago
40K and mlp together at last
Anonymous
#500263
10 months ago
It really dissapoints me that Weaver is a fury.

He has the best humor in the fandom, why should he be such a burnable sickfuck? ;_;
Anonymous
#504224
10 months ago
"welp, someone I like has a trait about them that I disagree with and don't understand, I'd better ADVOCATE BURNING THEM AT THE STAKE"

my goodness, you have revealed something terrifying about yourself there, but it seems that is what this post was made for
Anonymous
#648128
8 months ago
>>500263 He's not. You're just as furry as he is for being here.

Also, BREAKING NEWS! WHO GIVES A FUCK WHAT YOU'RE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO? JUST STFU AND ENJOY WHATEVER YOU ENJOY.
Anonymous
#815274
6 months ago
^ Can't be said enough.

LOOK AT WHAT YOU LIKE, DON'T LOOK AT WHAT YOU DON'T LIKE.

Why is that so fucking difficult for people?

I don't like anthro, so I don't look at anthro. I don't like furry artwork, so I just don't click on it. Instead of whining like babies, just save yourselves the trouble - if you don't want to see it, don't click the thumbnail.

Problem solved.