Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#480369
10 months ago
Great more witch hunt crap!
Tacoworld501
#480381
10 months ago
inb4Flamewar
Anonymous
#480396
10 months ago
Insert generic flames
NightJack
#480425
10 months ago
This is all I have.
BlastingGravy
#480438
10 months ago
That should probably be subtraction rather than division, NightJack. If you use division, a lack of ignorance is impossible, even theoretically.
NightJack
#480448
10 months ago
^ Your looking at it wrong.
BlastingGravy
#480475
10 months ago
Since "WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IT" is always less than or equal to "IT," the minimum value of ignorance is one. Therefore, according to that formula, you can never have zero ignorance on any subject.
Ichijoe
#480504
10 months ago
Seems legit... in fact this is more likely true too
NightJack
#480511
10 months ago
@BlastingGravy It's that ones ignorance is equal what one doesn't know of it, that's what you get when you divide "IT" by "WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IT"
BlastingGravy
#480540
10 months ago
@NightJack
If ones ignorance is equal to what one doesn't know about IT, then knowing everything about IT means ignorance should be zero. According to your formula, if you know everything about IT, ignorance is equal to one, not zero. This means that you still have some ignorance even when you know everything, which contradicts your own definition of ignorance.
Anonymous
#480607
10 months ago
not really funny at all.
Anonymous
#480699
10 months ago
The holocaust did happen.

But Jews were not the only victims.
NightJack
#481052
10 months ago
@BlastingGravy You do know you divide the top by the bottom, the bottom being the lower one in this case.
If "IT" is 10 and "WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IT" is 2 then that makes "IGNORANCE" 5, you puting it the as "IT" being the lower of the numbers.
NightJack
#481056
10 months ago
@BlastingGravy And in that way "IGNORANCE" is 0.2, so like I said you looking at it wrong.
Anonymous
#481366
10 months ago