Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#164716
1 year ago
Tad explicit, but the greater question is if it's any worse than what we've already got >>12757
AdrianBrony
#164725
1 year ago
It's really high on the questionable side, not really "explicit" in any clearly defined way, and no site rules are being violated. there's no reason to have it deleted.
Anonymous
#164735
1 year ago
^ That isn't a question at all. If it was then everything would be allowable because some pretty hefty shit was uploaded before and it took a while to delete. ps delete all porno fics on the site there are better hosts available

I can point out why this should be while that might not, though: The text is in the image and it modifies the context from Pinky just being in a collar to Fluttershy getting a soft dicking.

There was nothing in an earlier image to say Spike was fucking Pinkie but the cum. In this the cum is the text. Delete.
AdrianBrony
#164744
1 year ago
#164735
implication is all that is there. we've had worse on this site with no argument over it. I'm not saying I particularly like this but this is WELL within the boundaries of the written site rules. The cum was edited out because it was literally cum in that context. It isn't the text that counts here except in the fics, but those are a different beast alltogether.
Anonymous
#164761
1 year ago
"We've had worse" is a meaningless argument. It attempts to justify everything that isn't THE worst thing.

In this image the text replaces the cum in its implications. There isn't another situation these words(or that cum) fits into that isn't ridiculous, in the same manner as the cum. There is little effective difference between the two.
Anonymous
#164767
1 year ago
When I compare this to that Spike/Pinkie Pie thing from the yesterday that was removed, I guess I'd have to say I draw the line at obvious coitus with both partners present and/or sexual organs showing.

(Not to mention using Spike is at last two or three extra levels of wrong.)
Anonymous
#164775
1 year ago
I'll take this opportunity to point out the fleshy-colored bit between her legs.
Edef
#164778
1 year ago
Stop whining you babies.
Anonymous
#164779
1 year ago
The other ones in this series had that to. But it's ambiguous enough to appear to be shadowing. You can see the same thing on her elbows.
AdrianBrony
#164781
1 year ago
#164761
we have PLENTY on this site that implies ongoing sexual acts just like this image. the site rules are not about making the site a certain rating, it's about preventing genital exposure to prevent the site from becoming a full on porn dump like E621.
The pinkie picture was just slightly over the line, though it could have been justified in staying as well.

This one is further away from the line than that one was and it sticks perfectly to the rules as clarified by the admins in previous controversial images.
Anonymous
#164783
1 year ago
you gonna make an argument or are you gonna keep doing what you're accusing other people of?
Anonymous
#164787
1 year ago
Delete it or keep it, at least keep the artist:The_Weaver tag in tact.
redweasel
#164799
1 year ago
she's just a big baby about getting her tail brushed
Anonymous
#164805
1 year ago
AdrianBrony: My argument is that the text in this takes the place of the cum in that. "Rating" has nothing to do with it.
AdrianBrony
#164818
1 year ago
#164805
And my ardument is that this is text, that is cum, and you're equivocating two things that are completely different in their relationship to the site rules, regardless of what they imply.
Skipta
#164846
1 year ago
@Adrian: >this is text, that is cum, and you're equivocating two things that are completely different

Haha, oh wow. I can't believe you just had to say that, Adrian. :)
Anonymous
#164850
1 year ago
So your argument is that cum is the explicit material. In that case can we delete the Subway pics as well? I'd be happy with that.
AdrianBrony
#164853
1 year ago
#164846
Yeah it's why I usually stay out of arguments like this. I must me man-strating or something because I keep getting into arguments today.
Skipta
#164854
1 year ago
That's not cum, that's Mayonnaise, Anon850. :)
AdrianBrony
#164855
1 year ago
#164850
but that wasn't cum, it is OBVIOUSLY mayonaisse ;)
Anonymous
#164856
1 year ago
Skipta please don't snipe from the sidelines.
Anonymous
#164859
1 year ago
AdrianBrony: Perhaps Pinky and Spike had just finished sharing a Subway sandwich and hadn't cleaned up yet.
AdrianBrony
#164861
1 year ago
#164856
Nah, Skipta can go ahead. I'm pretty much done here as I think I've made the point I was trying to make to the best of my ability. We'll just wait for the mods response now that a decent debate has been posted for their consideration.
AdrianBrony
#164862
1 year ago
#164859
and yet the "mayo" seemed to be dripping from pinkie's nethers?

okay seriosuly I'm done here. I don't even LIKE this pic, heh.
Skipta
#164867
1 year ago
@Adrian: Hey now, I don't know how you eat your food, but...~
Anonymous
#164897
1 year ago
see this is why I like you Adrian, you get the point of discussion.

Speaking of, my final argument is that ignoring the obvious intent of the image because through some circuitous logic it can be made to appear as something else, is largely just ignoring the image.

#164862: Right, they just finished and Spike was giving her a hug to say thanks! It was one of those spicy subs, to explain why they were sweating.
Anonymous
#165679
1 year ago
She obviously loves having her tummy rubbed.
Anonymous
#199018
1 year ago
#165679 d'awwww you are now aware that dogs love it because it immitates humping sensation