Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#16986
1 year ago
Recoloring a picture doesn't make an "original character"
Anonymous
#16987
1 year ago
3 seconds on google
Anonymous
#16993
1 year ago
@anon1 Tell that to Hasbro :P
Sparkmane
#16995
1 year ago
he also has the same name as a pokemon
Anonymous
#17009
1 year ago
Actually, this was all done with no tracing on Photoshop. Several hours. :P -Arbok_X
Anonymous
#17017
1 year ago
^And it's still not an original character
Anonymous
#17018
1 year ago
I never said it was an original character. Someone else just set that tag. It's more a fan tribute to Spike than it is an original character.
Anonymous
#17054
1 year ago
Why has Spike been rolling in the mud?
Anonymous
#17094
1 year ago
What is this.
Anonymous
#17357
1 year ago
... I just hope it WAS mud
Turin_Aramaia
#17410
1 year ago
oh, LOL.

Could be a cousin of Spike. If you put Alex and Spike in a room and had Twilight pick who to have at her side always...
Anonymous
#17685
1 year ago
^... Spike'd win hooves down?
Anonymous
#17689
1 year ago
A pony recolor is fine but not a Spike recolor? What in the world?
Anonymous
#17884
1 year ago
^Don't know if you realized, but most of us are against Hasbro's Pony recolors, too.