Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

MetalHooves
#68797
1 year ago
Dear mod who deleted most of my work:

Luckily, I saved the macros. Is this good enough?

Sincerely, a somewhat flustered birthday pony.
Edef
#68798
1 year ago
wow, new mods are faggots if they're deleting writing. God forbid someone accidentally reads the whole thing.
Anonymous
#68804
1 year ago
Why would somebody delete such great writing?
Edef
#68806
1 year ago
Also, next time save as .png. JPEG compression is why the writing is fuzzy.
SpecialAnon
#68836
1 year ago
So...this is a re-upload yes? Man, I am disappoint at mods.
y
#68839
1 year ago
yeah it sure does suck that it took so long to delete content violating the "no NSFW content" rule.
Edef
#68847
1 year ago
This site was pretty cool back when it wasn't populated by thin-skins. Explicit content should have as much right to be here as any other content.
y
#68853
1 year ago
too bad for your masturbatory urges that it doesn't, eh?
Anonymous
#68856
1 year ago
Wow, whoever deleted these things is an idiot.
Edef
#68858
1 year ago
Haven't masturbated in two months. Violent and bloody is more my taste.
y
#68861
1 year ago
ladies and gentlemen, the distinguished opposition to rule of ... well, rule.
Edef
#68866
1 year ago
"NSFW" content is already prevalent here as it is, however the threshold for such things is becoming pathetically low.
Anonymous
#68869
1 year ago
You don't have to delete words. They're words. Press the back button.
Eco
#68871
1 year ago
The adoption of mods that are not me has left this whole process a little... shaky.

I'll be in touch with the mod in question.
Edef
#68873
1 year ago
Thank you Eco. I would also like to ask, what exactly do you intent Ponibooru to be. Will people like us get to enjoy their explicit content in the future?
y
#68875
1 year ago
but but but OTHER PEOPLE break the rule so I should be able to as well!
Edef
#68878
1 year ago
The only way the "NSFW" rule, IMO, should be enforced, is just straight up porn.
y
#68880
1 year ago
which this is.
Anonymous
#68884
1 year ago
y, this is words. you don't like where it's going? hit the back button, instant ramification. different from a picture, where you see it and instantly the content is burned into your eyes - here, you can choose to look away as soon as the BIG BAD WORDS approach, without actually seeing them.
Edef
#68885
1 year ago
This is text, no one's going to accidentally read it and be offended. You also have the explicit overlay to shield your sensitive eyes.
y
#68893
1 year ago
Oh I agree this is less NSFW than, say, >>11310 a giant horse dong, but it's still quite NSFW. I can't imagine how you'd attempt to argue that the eroticized sucking of a pe- horn isn't fetish pornography.

That the rule has been lax does not mean the rule did not exist and that this does not violate it.
Eco
#68894
1 year ago
It's unfortunate that all this comes up at a time when I really don't have the time to spare from IRL to oversee it.

My main aesthetic here is: people who want a thing should be able to get it, and people who don't want a thing should be able to pretend it doesn't exist. The NSFW rule is here from a previous 2am brainstorm of what the rules should be (since people wanted SOMETHING) and I don't want to re-calculate whether it's right or not. Personally, I consider explicit fic less of an issue than explicit art, because you see the art the moment it loads on your screen, whereas with fic you have plenty of warning that "it's going there" - which is part of why, despite the rule, I've not really done anything to crack down on this stuff. Maybe that's not the right policy. Maybe it should be stricter, or looser. I don't know. I wish I could just jettison my IRL situation and focus on this completely, if only because barn-painting arguments like this seem so much easier by comparison. But as it is I'd need more spare cycles to figure out what the fuck I ought to be doing.

Meh. Rambling again. Should probably get some sleep.
Edef
#68902
1 year ago
Well, scrap the NSFW rule, and replace it with a "no porn" rule. You already have measures in place to protect thin-skins, and it saves you the trouble of ambiguous rules.
MetalHooves
#68904
1 year ago
As long as your new mods don't run around canning well recieved stuff I worked very hard on, Eco, then I'm cool with it. I was more flankfried that I wasn't even notified than that it got canned; I could kinda see the mod's logic. Nonetheless, I already sent him a mouthfull about it.
Edef
#68905
1 year ago
Also if that was the CMC sex-ed image, that's the kind of content that the explicit overlay is for. It's just humour.
y
#68920
1 year ago
Removing "NSFW" and adding "pornographic"(or just 'graphic') would work to define things much more readily.

also, I could totally throw up some HI-LARIOUS bigoted images if you really want to try shielding a giant horse dong with "humor"
Anonymous
#68921
1 year ago
You should submit these to the My Lemon Pony: Fan'ship is Explicit archive (contains links to a bunch of NSFW stories, obviously):

http://fairyslayer.byethost4.com/ClopsSort.html

You should probably put them in their own Google Docs first though, so if they get deleted again people can still find them.
Edef
#68924
1 year ago
Go for it, Y.
Anonymous
#68930
1 year ago
*if they get deleted from here again, derp
MetalHooves
#68934
1 year ago
^
^My home is Ponibooru. If the internet collective sees it as worth the trouble to spread my work by its own design, far be it from me to stop them, but I'll only be uploading here. Ponibooru is where MetalHooves resides.
y
#68938
1 year ago
pro-bigotry, eh
Edef
#68960
1 year ago
It is unfortunate that it is human x pony, for otherwise I would read your work.
zgrillo2004
#69216
1 year ago
all I can say is revoke the fucking faggot ass clown thats removing these fics from mod status and get this over with. just leave the fics alone for christ sake
Anonymous
#69241
1 year ago
One of mah favourites :3
Mods, I am disappoint.
Anonymous
#74756
1 year ago
Hey y?
Eat like, a million dicks, k?
Just because you conduct yourself like a complete self-righteous tool.
DrunkVege
#158464
1 year ago
Yes, this one was the very first I read from you.
This was your only one at the time and I was just an anon.
I immediatly saved this into my computer's memory and I still have it.
It's a shame you had to re-upload this so my last comment is gone for good. Oh well...

But all I can say is I came to this when I read this for the first time.
MetalHooves
#159291
1 year ago
^ If nothing else, I have to congratulate you for being the first person who admits they've actually clopped to this.
Anonymous
#159931
1 year ago
Um, pardon me...not to interupt, but what happened to ponies love and tolerance. zgrillo2004 and Anonymous
#74756

I love it and thank you for posting MH, I am a big fan
Anonymous
#159935
1 year ago
^ me again, I have "enjoyed" all of your stories so far, thank you and also I wish you the best of luck on keeping them up. T'would be a shame if they were removed and lost
MetalHooves
#168502
1 year ago
^ they'll never be lost. I keep the original written works and the image macros. On a harddrive and a flashdrive.

Can't break my stride.
Metool
#177233
1 year ago
Unicorn magic, in the drink. This raises some questions.
Is it the same as the stuff Insert sucks out?
Anonymous
#184261
1 year ago
so...instead of fucking the guy just sucked her horn?

weird???
MetalHooves
#190858
1 year ago
^^ You know, I actually didn't even think of it that way until now. I'm gonna go with a no, just because yes is not the right answer to give.

^ and no, it's not weird at all. You just happen to be a human sucking the magic out of a small unicorn's horn.
Call_in_the_wind
#195256
1 year ago
Oh lordy what have "I" gotten myself into?