Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Icehawk
#347470
11 months ago
Fixed by the artist, now with 20% less giant snatch :)
-flood-
#347482
11 months ago
Nice.
Not too much and not too little.
And damn her face still gets me.
StreakTheFox
#347488
11 months ago
Edef
#347534
11 months ago
This is nudity, not porn. Tag as such.
pervotron3000
#347552
11 months ago
The whole dripping wet part ain't porn?
AdrianBrony
#347589
11 months ago
#347534
depends, it's nudity, but she is aroused and presenting in a sexual context.
non-porn nudity is like artistic nude or medical style diagram.
Icehawk
#347628
11 months ago
Pretty sure I had tagged it as both nudity and porn because it seems pretty clearly porn with the context of the image. lol, "artistic nudes" are not normally dripping and presenting themselves so sexually.
DashApples
#347641
11 months ago
The other version seems more natural.
Edef
#347856
11 months ago
Irrelevant. Nudity is showing off, porn is when penetration or such occurs.
StalkerZHS
#347905
11 months ago
ive never jacked off to any kinda "cute porn" EVER
thats going to change
Icehawk
#348888
11 months ago
....Ok, so apparently Edef has never heard of softcore pornography before.
Edef
#348923
11 months ago
It's just how the tags work bro.
Icehawk
#348935
11 months ago
This websites definition porn for tag rules is simply, "Anything overtly sexual is occurring on screen" that is incredibly vague and it says nothing about requiring penetration as you are claiming, perhaps you should add that to the porn tag rule?
Edef
#351385
11 months ago
This is how it's been running since the rule change. Leave it alone.
Rick132500
#708854
7 months ago
No