
| PonyRIG #229647 1 year ago |
RRRRRRRRUUUUULLLSSSS! respect them |
| Kooner #229652 1 year ago |
Gore
Porn Nudity Furry - lol |
| Turin_Aramaia #229653 1 year ago |
you can ask them to deleteme if it still disturbs you. |
| Fuzzy_Logic #229656 1 year ago |
"Furry" on the same level as "Gore", "Porn", and "Nudity".
Good lord, you whiny babies. |
| Turin_Aramaia #229659 1 year ago |
there should be a gray "furry" explicit-like hider like the questionable/explicit ones. I know I wouldn't like that, personally, but... |
| Anonymous #229660 1 year ago |
yep
This is going to be fun |
| PynkyPy #229664 1 year ago |
YAY NEW RULES!!!! I"M FREEE!!!!! |
| Xzar #229670 1 year ago |
I'm okay with this. |
| magique #229673 1 year ago |
This has potential to turn into a shit-nami really quickly. |
| Anonymous #229677 1 year ago |
Porn, allowed?
HELL YES! |
| Anonymous #229678 1 year ago |
you guys are stupid |
| Heartmend #229689 1 year ago |
Magique, if you don't like a particular subject you know you can filter that particular tag, right? This way everyone sees only the stuff they want to see. |
| Edef #229691 1 year ago |
Huzzah, freedom! |
| feather #229701 1 year ago |
furry's in the list because people complain about it. There are certain users who will blacklist it. I'm sure it's not a judgement on eco's part, anymore then his inclusion of nudity is a condemnment of nudity :P
@turin you can turn exlicit/questionable etc thumbnails on and off now . . . even safe has a spoiler thumbnail XD @magique not really. people overestimate the amount of porn to normal content available . . . |
| Anonymous #229712 1 year ago |
So furries can stay if they are properly tagged?
Aww bummer. |
| Anonymous #229714 1 year ago |
I think you underestimate furries. We'll see in the coming weeks. |
| Blues #229720 1 year ago |
i totally aprove. |
| Anonymous #229729 1 year ago |
INB4 4 consecutive pages of furry NSFW content. |
| feather #229735 1 year ago |
@229712 wha? o.O first of all, what? second of all, porn being allowed on Ponibooru isn't going to increase the volumn produce to any appreciable degree. it's still something like %2 of the content available. |
| Aurora_Moon #229747 1 year ago |
....i smell a pic of everypony in the sisterhood in a giant orgy being made and posted, now. well, least the 5 more commonly known members. me, Pynky, Spitfire, kasumi, and emeriin. |
| Eco #229758 1 year ago |
People who don't like furry stuff can filter it, and they'll have the site as it would be if furry stuff was against the rules (since posting without the tag is as bad now as posting forbidden content was yesterday).
@229714: Admittedly, there's a couple ways this could go wrong. Like you said, we'll see; if this permissive upload + strict tagging system turns out to not work, we'll revisit the rules at that time. |
| PynkyPy #229772 1 year ago |
@Eco As long as people tag NSFW as they see it. There should be no problem. |
| Aurora_Moon #229793 1 year ago |
now to handle one other thing. which im probably gonna get alotta 'wtf' responses over. a forum. yes, yes, i know, the actual FIMchan is probably supposed to be this booru's forum...but i really dont feel that way. one, its a chan-type board. not a forum.[i consider the two different. its got to do with styling. i'll explain later.]
so, we kinda just need a forum for the booru itsself. it'd at least help with requests for certain kinds of art, and give new registered users a place to say hi.[which brings up another issue i'll get to in abit.]point is, the chan is more for discussion of the show in general. not about the booru. we need a forum for the booru. but about the 'place to say hi' detail i brought up...it does kinda remind me of something. we cant go on someone's page and view every single comment they've left, much like on e621. i'm sure those of us who like to interact here in the comments could find a damn good use for that, and be able to more easily respond to responses to old comments. plus it might get some attention to older pics by old and new users alike. help ponies find stuff without spending hours shifting through the 30K+ pics so far. one last thing. probably-huge comment is probably huge. i cant tell for sure yet.*clicks 'post comment' to find out* |
| JustTheBast #229796 1 year ago |
But if anthro images get tagged properly and all the haters can now filter them out completely, then who will let the furries know that they are third-class citizens who are ruining this fandom for-evvaaarrr?
Oh wait, what am I saying? As if haters would ever let something like that keep them from bitching and whining. Hah! |
| Sind #229884 1 year ago |
Why the hell does i say "furry"
"anthro" is a much better therm, specially since a good amount of furry pieces so far has been tagged as such |
| Anonymous #230003 1 year ago |
@feather: The pony-related contents of r34 alone would be a little less than 3% of the content of ponibooru(which is greatly inflated by a boatload of "memes" and other very nearly duplicate images).
"furry" is a perfectly fine tag as despite the insistence of some there is a definite "furry" form(loosely, a human form with dominant animal traits) and it is not everyone's cup of tea. "Anthro" on the other hand is shorthand for Anthropomorphic, which is such a vastly more inclusive term that it would be on very nearly image on the site. |
| Anonymous #230055 1 year ago |
'Furry' doesn't actually mean 'humanoid anthro', but if that's what youu want to use the term for, whatever. |
| Eco #230081 1 year ago |
Okay, yeah, "furry" has a specific meaning which is a subset of "anthro". But how do you describe the difference in an unambiguous way? (Not a rhetorical question; if you have a suggestion I'm all ears.) |
| Anonymous #230122 1 year ago |
@230055: You're right, it means "Human form with dominant animal traits" - it isn't much more well defined than that because the furry subculture simultaneously wants to replace it with "anthropomorphic" and have "furry" replace anthropomorphic for various reasons, all of which are dumb, and this results in an ever-shifting and nebulous definition of "furry" that causes a bunch of drama. The main thing you can get a given bunch of furries to agree on, however, is that http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6037749/this sort of thing is definitely furry. |
| Anonymous #230127 1 year ago |
^ http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6037749/
fixed link. though that does remind me that a site guide would be pretty cool. |
| JustTheBast #230221 1 year ago |
Add to that the fact that those who hate "furry stuff", and thus would want to filter it, and those who like "furry stuff", and are thus most likely to post it, have rather different definitions of what constitutes "furry stuff", as well. |
| Sonlir #230309 1 year ago |
Furry stuff is easy to recognise in 3 easy steps:
1 - Does it have fur? 2 - Is it engaging in something you count as erotic/fetishist? 3 - Does it disturb/arouse you? If all 3 answers are yes then congratulations you have recognised furry stuff. Moreso if you find it apealing you are probably a furry. Have a nice day. |
| redweasel #230336 1 year ago |
that's furry + porn sonlir, not just furry. furry is just #1
and #3 you whiny baby |
| Sonlir #230363 1 year ago |
@redweasel Not quite porn.
How about all those fetish pics flying around? It's not porn (at least usually) but it does make certain people clop to it even when the said picture is barely erotic. Stuffed Lyra for example. nothing directly erotic but SOMEONE out there is aroused by it. |
| Anonymous #230882 1 year ago |
will you two kiss already |
| JustTheBast #231581 1 year ago |
Thank you, Sonlir and redweasel for proving my point so adroitly.
As you can see, for some people anything they don't like can somehow be classified as "furry", simply because in their mind everything bad that exists in the world is the fault of furries. |