Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

PynkyPy
#87311
1 year ago
No porn please!
Anonymous
#87317
1 year ago
not porn, but rules are rules. so please delete this.
Anonymous
#87318
1 year ago
Random Fact:
This was the 800th My little Pony: Friendship is Magic Picture on Rule34!
Anonymous
#87321
1 year ago
Can someone get this guy banned?
CranialHeartache
#87322
1 year ago
Positive spiral. Yes.
PynkyPy
#87327
1 year ago
^ he just dosen't know tits and vag's = porn

If you remove the tits/nipples and/or vag, ithas a better chance of staying here.
Anonymous
#87334
1 year ago
Hi me again, from the last 2 images, don't assume that my defense of these means I've posted them, cause its not me.
Anonymous
#87348
1 year ago
Also, I was the one arguing with you and I want it to be known I do not think this is porn, but it still should be deleted. but I don't think we can really come up with anything fruitful with further arguing so yeah...
hullo
#87362
1 year ago
@ anon and pynkypy I'm a girl....
Anonymous
#87366
1 year ago
What defines porn on this site?
Anonymous
#87371
1 year ago
Anything that features primary or secondary sexual characteristics, I would assume.
PynkyPy
#87372
1 year ago
@ hullo So am I... :)

I'm not kidding you.

But the minds of today's wold are too perverted to admire nude art without going all out wingboner.
Anonymous
#87376
1 year ago
pynkypy, why don't you go through an art gallery and see how many people gawk at the nudes.

still don't think it's okay to upload HERE but come on, dont' be that way about nude in general.
Anonymous
#87377
1 year ago
Why is it an intelligent convo starts as soon as i leave?
PynkyPy
#87381
1 year ago
^ Well, the American mind anyways is a lost cause.

I actually admire the Nude Mermaid Statue in Copenhagen. I can look at nude stuff and not be affected. I taught myself control! :)
PynkyPy
#87385
1 year ago
Also, the Europeans are better in general to the American mind.
Anonymous
#87387
1 year ago
^Hay I....am an American and agree with you in every way.
Anonymous
#87390
1 year ago
hey look all you have to do to keep a porno image alive is post something vaguely resembling an argument!

LOOPHOLE FOUND

LET'S POST EVERYTHING ON R34 GUYS
Anonymous
#87394
1 year ago
pynkypy, you do NOT want to start assuming things like that. artistic nude is just as respected over here. I'm not going to say the US is better, but it sure ain't worse all things considered. I'm NOT about to continue on the europe V america debate. There are nude statues all around over here as well, people contain themselves just as much.
PynkyPy
#87399
1 year ago
^ I'm American...
Anonymous
#87400
1 year ago
also, are you from denmark? nice. I've always wanted to visit denmark.
Anonymous
#87402
1 year ago
There's some human version porn, did we delete those.
Anonymous
#87406
1 year ago
oh, byu the mention of the copenhagen statue I guess I assumed... well, my mistake I apologize.

The point is you REALLY sell us short culturally int hat regard.
Anonymous
#87407
1 year ago
Just for the record, I'm saving all of these.
Strat
#87408
1 year ago
These comments are too funny. ^_^
Anonymous
#87410
1 year ago
^The American attitude is often a bit more juvenile. I live in the bloodly bible belt and i can attest to how people react to anything remotely racy(from time to time) . They tore down a statue infront of the art museum over here because it was a nude.
Anonymous
#87411
1 year ago
^^ We SHOULD have.
Anonymous
#87413
1 year ago
okay point taken there are some backwards parts of the country.
Anonymous
#87420
1 year ago
my point is, however, that regardless of who is the superior culture, the discussion is on the rules of this site. and although I think it can be a little full of BS, in general the rules are there for a reason and a little bit of BS is permissable for the purposes they serve.
Anonymous
#87421
1 year ago
I'm from Denmark myself. We are in no way afraid of nudity here, that's for sure.

Here's a commercial that's being shown doing prime time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuI_dZAg1dA

It's a mobile commercial, but these things are pretty normal here.
TooOldForThisShow
#87435
1 year ago
Strange, I clicked this thumbnail and it brought me to 4chan.
wolfnanaki
#87596
1 year ago
Wait...

If porn's not allowed on this site, why do we have the "Explicit" option in the first place?
Anonymous
#87605
1 year ago
For gory pics.
Anonymous
#87608
1 year ago
Look at it. There is no "tasteful" nature here, and the artist has done an awful job of it in general. But because the mods think that someone might say something that means a goddamn thing it's going to stay here, being awful, for days.

This is what I was talking about when I said that greenlighting "discussion" threads was a terrible, awful idea.

^ Because Questionable is for material that doesn't break the rules.
Anonymous
#87697
1 year ago
I don't think anyone will say that this piece's purpose isn't primarily erotic.
Anonymous
#87748
1 year ago
Sad that this site has no qualms about violence and gore, but one sight of anatomically correct and everypony just freaks out.
Anonymous
#87760
1 year ago
^ Yes because an example of one thing slips by all rules must be suspended

this is flawless logic that will be upheld through all scrutiny
Anonymous
#87790
1 year ago
You guys have to admit erotic or not the art kicks ass
Anonymous
#87871
1 year ago
^ The rock she's humping is literally just a picture of a rock or cliff that's been fiddled with a bit.

The lighting is confused. The midsection looks funky as hell and throws the perspective into question because of it. The head has little depth. The mohawk has no depth at all.

The best drawn part of this is her breasts, and because of that and the shading around her pits, her upper body looks like a separate piece.

I mean this isn't fucking Liefeld, but it's not Jim Lee either.
Anonymous
#88142
1 year ago
Artistic nudity, you uncultured idiots.
Obscure
#88146
1 year ago
Defending artistic boobs is hard on this site.
Anonymous
#88150
1 year ago
Er, seriously our admin/moderation added features to protect gore but nudity is still a no-no? I hate people sometimes, are we run by the Parents Television Council?
Obscure
#88152
1 year ago
PTC has teached the masses what is obscene or not.

This site is controlled by the masses.

Thus yes. Yes it does.
Anonymous
#88194
1 year ago
Jesus haet furry
Anonymous
#88239
1 year ago
^^^^It helps if you actually defend artistic boobs.

^^^The "WELL THIS OTHER THING UNRELATED TO THIS THING EXISTS SO-" argument is fucking imbecilic and you should be ashamed for making it.

^^Take your tinfoil hattery to a thread about it, you worthless thing.

^Troll elsewhere.

As to artistic nudity, the only relatively interesting argument presented, the key is presentation and purpose. In this case the presentation is a... presenting anthro zebra up against a 2d rock, looking over her shoulder expectantly. yeah. Moving along, I checked out the artist's FA gallery. The vast majority of it is entirely sexualized or straight up pornography and this was apparently done(quickly, poorly) because someone else had tried to color the sketch version, which was itself done as boobies for the sake of boobies, if the artist's comments are anything to go by(hint: they are).

If you want a boobies fix , Rule34 is fantastic for boobies, as is wildcritters and e621 and many other sites I am sure you are already aware of.
Anonymous
#88255
1 year ago
^"I checked out the artist's FA gallery"

yes hello, he's SCAPPO for fucks sake.
Oh-noes
#88266
1 year ago
We need a tag filter feature.

I'm getting sick of all the furries ruining my fandom.
Obscure
#88274
1 year ago
^^^ Artists create Art. They do not create meaning.

'Circe scaling cliff face searching for ingredients and wary of danger'

meh, though. I like the line work, the colours and the back ground, but it's not really that much of a keeper to me.

*straightens his offended tinfoil hat*
Anonymous
#88307
1 year ago
can this bullshit be deleted already, the discussion treads old ground and nothing is changed.
Obscure
#88321
1 year ago
^So you don't care to defend your position any more?
Dark_Horst
#88331
1 year ago
"presenting anthro zebra up against a 2d rock, looking over her shoulder expectantly"

i'm curious: so you're implying impending sex scene because a zebra is loking into a forest?
also this head-tild looks more sidewards to me than anything
Skywind
#88442
1 year ago
omg guys its just a drawing of nekkid zecora
wolfnanaki
#88507
1 year ago
Who the hell keeps resetting the tags and source? Artist and link readded.
Anonymous
#88518
1 year ago
naked ladies is not a porn (if they do not anything of course)
Anonymous
#88555
1 year ago
^^^^^ If you can present an argument that I have not yet countered, whether or not you believe it was effective, please do so.

^^^^ The image is tasteless and created purely for titties. It is the very definition of gratuitous. Check the creator's FA gallery if you care to, it has all the evidence of it.

^^^ Gratuitous titties on an image dump dedicated to a children's cartoon show.

^ Indeed. ... Unless of course that naked ladies is created to be a porn. As this was.

I noticed on another one of these someone suggested that because R34 did not accept something, then it must not be porn. This is a silly argument for a variety of reasons, but let's think about another turn of it simply because I'm bored: R34 would accept this. Should this site mirror content already on R34?
PynkyPy
#88557
1 year ago
When will this war end? Eco, where are you?
Dark_Horst
#88568
1 year ago
for fucks sake, stop gibbering about the creators FA page, it's motherfucking scappo, WHAT DO YOU EXPECT?
this discussion is about this picture not the other stuff the creator might have done some other time and witch has nothing to do with it, so stop shoving it in. jesus.
and really... why do you give a shit anyway?
Anonymous
#88570
1 year ago
^^ oh and "presenting" is used in the technical sense. When equines 'present', their tail moves up and out of the way in the the same fashion Zecora's is here. I see now that could be unclear, sorry.
Anonymous
#88585
1 year ago
Actually Dark_Horst, the comments from the artist on the page are quite illuminating as to the purpose of the image. That is also what I am referencing, not simply the creator's general body of work.

you would know that if you had read the posts instead of being a chump and skipping to the end.

I have time to burn, and Eco apparently loves reading this shit even if it goes over exactly the same ground again and again, so why not? Besides, I don't think every angle has been tried yet, and the horse isn't really dead until they have been. Right? :V
Obscure
#88591
1 year ago
How is this piece tasteless? She's as naked as she always is and doing the things she always does. Only in this instance she is drawn anthro.

The artists other works are not being debated, unless you believe we should blacklist artists for failure to uphold your moral views in all of their work.

My own work >>6820 and >>12326 are equally if not more inappropriate for the audience of a children's cartoon show.

But, has it succeeded in being porn? It may be more erotic then the lingerie section of a sears catalogue but it is less erotic then an animal planet documentary.

This site should mirror any content within it's purview.
Anonymous
#88647
1 year ago
this is just cruel. I'm sorry. I withdraw.
Justanotherperson
#88675
1 year ago
"But, has it succeeded in being porn? It may be more erotic then the lingerie section of a sears catalogue but it is less erotic then an animal planet documentary."

I'm sorry wat?

I had written a tl;dr text on the issues here but now I just feel so confused.
Anonymous
#1492406
4 days ago
We've sure have changed since the site started.
Lium
#1492463
4 days ago
^ Rules relaxed.