
| punctualjinx #520650 9 months ago |
I've been fighting against the rule of "no pedofolia" for awhile and this site has finally allowed this type of content.
inb4 rage |
| Lance #520652 9 months ago |
THAT
FUCKING TAG MY SIDES HURT |
| Frisby #520660 9 months ago |
O rly? And when did this happen? |
| Eco #520668 9 months ago |
A quick reminder for anyone rushing to upload their favorite risqué sketches of Diamond Tiara: there is a mandatory tag assigned to this class of content, which will be enforced at the same level as the rest of the mandatory tags - one-day bans upon first offense, with escalating consequences upon repeat offenses. Also remember that sexual depictions of underage humans (or humanized characters) are no less illegal than they were yesterday; such content is still banned outright.
For the rest of you: you are encouraged to use the Content Preferences system to expunge content which you would rather not see, and further encouraged to report images which are missing their mandatory tags. Thank you for using Ponibooru. |
| Kajet #520670 9 months ago |
Isn't this a repost of a repost of a repost of a repost? |
| SenatorSufficient #520674 9 months ago |
There is going to be so much foalporn in the coming days. |
| Lance #520680 9 months ago |
@Kajet Don't you remember? Every post is a repost of a repost. |
| Van_Horsing #520706 9 months ago |
Tagged as porn to keep the angry filterers only semi-frothing. |
| Mattatatta #520707 9 months ago |
@Senator
Yeah, there'll be a storm of it, no doubt. But look at it this way: Once everyone has posted all of the current available content, the storm shall die down and things will return to a more or less normal routine. |
| punctualjinx #520748 9 months ago |
@eco you're ban didn't work on me.
Isn't a one day ban for accidentally forgetting to include the "porn" tag a big harsh? |
| Doctor_Whooves #520751 9 months ago |
Nah. Harsh would be forcing you to get in there and suck that cock with them. |
| Eco #520757 9 months ago |
It's been the policy ever since we've had a filter. If people don't tag correctly at the time of upload, there's no point in the filter system in the first place, since the #1 place for people to see mistagged material is on the front page, where things will appear the moment they're uploaded.
Hence, missing tags carry, at minimum, a ban that's just long enough to have a sting to it. |
| punctualjinx #520767 9 months ago |
I may not agree with the rule but I guess I gotta obey it. |
| Rectifier #520775 9 months ago |
Alea Iacta Est! |
| Anonymous #520777 9 months ago |
Well, go on guys. Start uploadin' |
| Eco #520787 9 months ago |
(full disclosure: the original reason for "1 day" was that it seemed long enough to be sure that the warning was seen by anon users whose home timezone was unknown. but I don't really see 24 hours as too draconian for a warning shot, so. yeah.) |
| Anonymous #520804 9 months ago |
Does Spike count as foalcon? |
| Sono #520851 9 months ago |
so oral sex, cum, swapping between sweetie belle and celestia.
*claps and clops* |
| your_waifu #520859 9 months ago |
I hope this place becomes as fun in a bit as the awesome first week or so after 34 and gore were allowed. Good times. |
| Anonymous #520866 9 months ago |
Wait, wait, wait... so, now filly-porn is allowed? or it's not? and if so, how? Explain me this. |
| Anonymous #520883 9 months ago |
Ok, I just saw this:
porn - use when anything overtly sexual is occuring onscreen. foalcon - should be used in addition to "porn" when underage characters are involved (keep content rule 2a in mind here). Then, my question is: why the change? |
| Anonymous #520891 9 months ago |
![]() |
| Eco #520898 9 months ago |
@520804: he's an underaged non-human, so yes. I mean, he isn't technically a foal, but we had to choose a standardized tag name that *didn't* include humans, and "foalcon" was as good as any.
@520866: allowed, on two conditions: 1) non-human, non-humanized; if this image had a human version of sweetie-belle in it, it'd still be against the rules, because it'd be illegal for me to host. 2) it must be uploaded with the "foalcon" tag. skipping that tag carries the same penalties as uploading an explicit image as "safe". |
| Eco #520916 9 months ago |
@520883: It took this long for certain users to convince me that such content wouldn't put me at risk legally, and to remind me that the policy of prohibiting it when it wasn't a legal risk prevented the site from fulfilling its intended purpose (a one-stop repository for the fandom's image output). |
| Sono #520935 9 months ago |
yay it stayz, hopefully. Because when i first joined here i was like "spike sechs allowed, but not any foals?" Nice to see it's consistent now. |
| Eco #520946 9 months ago |
spike sex wasn't allowed either. if it didn't get deleted, it's 'cuz it didn't get reported. |
| derpie #521035 9 months ago |
wait when did ponibooru come down so close to my level? j/k, just wish I'd kept checking the rules. I had a lot of the former deleted content ready to go. (including that gem here ^^^.) |
| Silversoul666 #522670 9 months ago |
Oh happy day, oh happy day |
| Anonymous #523201 9 months ago |
^ Happy day for U. |
| Silversoul666 #525545 9 months ago |
^ That's why I said it. |
| Liberion #551853 9 months ago |
This is amazing. |
| ace #576725 9 months ago |
On the plus side, I really like her mane. |
| Gill_Sans #657293 8 months ago |
![]() |