
| Anonymous #480369 10 months ago |
Great more witch hunt crap! |
| Tacoworld501 #480381 10 months ago |
inb4Flamewar |
| Anonymous #480396 10 months ago |
Insert generic flames |
| NightJack #480425 10 months ago |
This is all I have.
![]() |
| BlastingGravy #480438 10 months ago |
That should probably be subtraction rather than division, NightJack. If you use division, a lack of ignorance is impossible, even theoretically. |
| NightJack #480448 10 months ago |
^ Your looking at it wrong. |
| BlastingGravy #480475 10 months ago |
Since "WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IT" is always less than or equal to "IT," the minimum value of ignorance is one. Therefore, according to that formula, you can never have zero ignorance on any subject. |
| Ichijoe #480504 10 months ago |
Seems legit... in fact this is more likely true too |
| NightJack #480511 10 months ago |
@BlastingGravy It's that ones ignorance is equal what one doesn't know of it, that's what you get when you divide "IT" by "WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IT" |
| BlastingGravy #480540 10 months ago |
@NightJack
If ones ignorance is equal to what one doesn't know about IT, then knowing everything about IT means ignorance should be zero. According to your formula, if you know everything about IT, ignorance is equal to one, not zero. This means that you still have some ignorance even when you know everything, which contradicts your own definition of ignorance. |
| Anonymous #480607 10 months ago |
not really funny at all. |
| Anonymous #480699 10 months ago |
The holocaust did happen.
But Jews were not the only victims. |
| NightJack #481052 10 months ago |
@BlastingGravy You do know you divide the top by the bottom, the bottom being the lower one in this case.
If "IT" is 10 and "WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IT" is 2 then that makes "IGNORANCE" 5, you puting it the as "IT" being the lower of the numbers. |
| NightJack #481056 10 months ago |
@BlastingGravy And in that way "IGNORANCE" is 0.2, so like I said you looking at it wrong. |
| Anonymous #481366 10 months ago |
![]() |