
| stormtrooper1701 #307001 1 year ago |
Either way, the bushes look like crap. |
| Gittonsxv #307005 1 year ago |
the custem one just seems to be darker xD |
| Anonymous #307009 1 year ago |
That looks like you just decreased the brightness on the second one. |
| Kein #307012 1 year ago |
Bushes is the last thing you need to care about. |
| stormtrooper1701 #307020 1 year ago |
@Kein: Not sure if remark about Hunters or insult to posing skills... |
| StalkerZHS #307027 1 year ago |
the lights are in exactly the same angles!
only darker! |
| stormtrooper1701 #307035 1 year ago |
In retrospect, this was probably a bad comparison picture. The lighting really is different from the standard lighting other than being "darker". |
| Anonymous #307073 1 year ago |
They're in the same angels but you can tell the contrast is higher and the shadows are softer. |
| stormtrooper1701 #307094 1 year ago |
Yeah, this isn't working how I wanted it to... |
| bersl2 #307186 1 year ago |
You probably should have made this single-blind and not told us which image corresponded to which lighting procedure.
Also, did you use anti-aliasing on the bottom but not on the top? Or is that a property of the experimental lighting? |
| Anonymous #307813 1 year ago |
They're the same thing, the second one is just blurrier and darker.
Successful troll is successful. |