
| Flammie #386826 11 months ago |
Yay indeed! |
| Anonymous #386838 11 months ago |
Should be white green... |
| Anonymous #386849 11 months ago |
get that comma outta there |
| FanOfMostEverything #387066 11 months ago |
Plusses: Derpy watermark
Dat flavor text Minuses: Far too expensive. After adjusting for color, I'd recommend 1GW. This is non-enraged Fluttershy. Consider making her a 0/3 or 0/4, and maybe make that protection from creatures in general. If the subject the card is speaking in the flavor text, you don't have to attribute the quote. Templating fail. Use the following: "GW, T: Put a 0/1 white Bird creature token with flying or a 1/1 white Rabbit creature token onto the battlefield." Also, consider making the bunnies green. |
| pervotron2000 #388658 11 months ago |
Why's the tags for the next image mixed in with this one's? Fixed. |
| Anonymous #389461 11 months ago |
Overcosted. This could cost 2 less, and it still wouldn't be overpowered. |
| Gregorius #701341 8 months ago |
First off, should be G/W, as everyone's saying.
Secondly, you could definitely lower the mana cost by at least one. Flying helps Fluttershy 'cause she's a pegasus, sure, but protection from Beasts is a very niche ability; it'll have an effect on play, but not always (also, protection should not have been capitalized). Third—and this annoys me more than anything when dealing with amateur card makers—if you are given a choice between one of two effects in the same ability, you label it as "Choose one — [effect #1]; or [effect #2]". Hell, you can add more effects if you want; it doesn't matter. Finally, when dealing with character quotes or excerpts from other sources, you put the quote above, the source that quote was from below, and a soft break [that's SHIFT + ENTER in MSE] separating them so it looks like this: "It needs to be about 20% cooler." — Rainbow Dash |