Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

redweasel
#233435
1 year ago
yeah there's just a lot of old porn that hasn't been uploaded yet
Anonymous
#233437
1 year ago
I can clop to this.
Edef
#233439
1 year ago
If you don't like it, filter it out.
LemonSweets
#233440
1 year ago
It says explicit.

Don't click it.
Princess_Luna
#233443
1 year ago
Why? The kind Owner of Ponibooru put Content Filters in place so that you don't need to see any of it... Filter out "Explicit" images!
Mike-RaWare
#233445
1 year ago
nope.mpg

If you don't want to see the porn just use the filter editor and add 'porn' to 'Tags to filter out'.
applebeans
#233451
1 year ago
rediculous
Flaskgarg
#233454
1 year ago
Wasn't the porn just allowed?
It is natural for there to be a river of porn flowing in for the next couple days...
Anonymous
#233456
1 year ago
Wait, where is this porn? Someone direct me in the direction of porn.

Wait! I see it, I see where you turn on the porn. Nevermind.
Kooner
#233458
1 year ago
Am ok with that.
Sparkling
#233460
1 year ago
@Edef, LemonSweets, Princess_Luna, Mike-RaWare:
Youre all right.
Anonymous
#233462
1 year ago
I think it's more about there's too much porn being uploaded, and I don't get to see enough normal art.
Not many people are uploading that anymore...
Frostbite
#233470
1 year ago
^^THIS
Eco
#233477
1 year ago
To be fair, it's possible to like something and still be tired of it.

Hang in there, Frostbite; the backlog should dry up in a few days.
Anonymous
#233481
1 year ago
Complain to the artists then.
Edef
#233482
1 year ago
@462

Implying I didn't just dump ~20 "normal" pictures.
Sparkling
#233486
1 year ago
What you mean by "normal"pics?
Doctor_Whooves
#233489
1 year ago
Doesn't bother me personally, although I do think it's a shame that vast majority of the porn is very poorly-drawn, and overall a bit tacky.
Frostbite
#233492
1 year ago
You have to admit... the massive amount of porn being dumped IS a bit excessive...

I like to see Everything, but in balance...
Anonymous
#233493
1 year ago
The backlog will definitely dry up somewhat soon. Looking at the majority of rule34 sites out there, the amount of MLP porn, gore, ect isn't overwhelming compared to the clean pics. Give it a few days and everything will even out.
Anonymous
#233496
1 year ago
@Edef: No, I know you did.
But you have to admit before you did that it was mostly nothing but porn.
I kinda felt you posted that wave of normal ones to counteract that.

@Sparkling: Nonporn.
Anonymous
#233499
1 year ago
No, keep posting porn. Rule34 loads slow as shit.
Edef
#233500
1 year ago
I am indifferent to porn, gore, and normal images.
kanashiikage
#233506
1 year ago
Why the heck are anons complaining? Porn is filtered out of your searches BY DEFAULT.

And I honestly don't see this thing of Ponibooru being flooded.
Anonymous
#233508
1 year ago
there's a lot of people that really, really, really want to show the world all their porn. Right now.
Frostbite
#233513
1 year ago
@kanashiikage

Scroll back a couple of pages and youll see plenty... back to back
Anonymous
#233518
1 year ago
Here comes another wave
kanashiikage
#233537
1 year ago
*scrolls back*

I've seen bigger image macro floods and meme wars here then that that tiny puddle ripple back there.

I think it's just the onset of porn itself that is surprising you rather then the number of it. That anon up there is crazy making that out as

"and I don't get to see enough normal art.
Not many people are uploading that anymore..."
Anonymous
#233551
1 year ago
Agreed. Even with the porn the majority of work uploaded per day is clean or questionable at worst.
Jimmytrius
#233557
1 year ago
The good thing about this is that all the art concerning MlP will be in one single site, and having the option to put filters on the images you see everyone should be OK ;)

I guess the sudden BOOM of porno images is just logical, as there was so much art that couldn't be uploaded here until now, for that reason :$
Jimmytrius
#233561
1 year ago
"porn images", I mean >_<
Anonymous
#233618
1 year ago
I like how we've gone from "less than 3%" to "Well MOST of it isn't porn..."

I hope for a "Well there's still a lot of clean content being uploaded!" by the middle of week 2.

which coincidentally SHOULD be when the porn wave starts to fall off if it's going to. I'm optimistic.
Pwneh
#233638
1 year ago
YO-ESTOY-DE-ACUERDO-CON-ESTO.JPG

i prefer pr0n, its better than the absurd "meme wars", if it is disgusting for somepony we all can use the filters.
Anonymous
#233648
1 year ago
Hey guess what, memes are uploaded with the "meme" tag- or should be. You can just ignore them too! You can ignore everything you don't like! There's no purpose in complaining about anything at all ever because you can just ignore it!

have we seen yet how retarded this line of thought is or should I repeat myself
Sparkling
#233663
1 year ago
@docterwhooves: Youre right. But this is a stayer pic bout the art. http://ponibooru.413chan.net/post/view/30479
Anonymous
#233695
1 year ago
sure if you're a pedophile.
Sparkling
#233719
1 year ago
Wait. Its about the quality of porn pics not whats on it.
Flaskgarg
#233726
1 year ago
Yes, because nobrony goes to porn to look at the content.
Sparkling
#233751
1 year ago
The only reason why i got there is that is have an haibitat of cliking on the Questionable an Explict pics. Just curios whats behind there.
Anonymous
#233760
1 year ago
we're saying that it's still a picture of prepubescent children engaging in sexual activities.
Doctor_Whooves
#233767
1 year ago
@Sparkling: While that image is technically well-done, the content is pedo. Not being a pedophile, I see no appeal to that image. It's a shame the artist didn't choose to just stick to adult characters, instead.
Edef
#233776
1 year ago
One could argue that the mane cast are just as much children as the CMC are.
Doctor_Whooves
#233792
1 year ago
Just as much? I don't think so. You could perhaps argue that they're still under 18 (though the majority of the fandom seems to think not), but they're not anywhere near as emotionally immature as the CMC; and physically they seem to be no different than any other adult character aside from the extreme examples who are middle-aged (Mayor) to senior citizen (Granny Smith).
Edef
#233806
1 year ago
Aye, but you're segregating between young and younger, depending on your interpretation of the mane 6. Either way, it's a show for children. The characters aren't meant to be mature.
Doctor_Whooves
#233816
1 year ago
But they come across that way, nonetheless. Well, all except Pinkie.

Besides, the age of consent is actually 16 in much of the US, all of Canada, the UK, and much of the rest of Europe.

Personally, Pinkie's the only one of the six I would actually put below 18. The others don't act appreciably different from any of my 19-23/24 year-old friends.
Sparkling
#233835
1 year ago
@doctorwhooves; Yea thats true
Edef
#233869
1 year ago
You mean they have slumber parties and go insane when animals don't like them? :V

Anyways, I'm just arguing for the sake of it. I don't support those images, but I'm not offended by them either. Quite simply the rules allow them.
Doctor_Whooves
#233875
1 year ago
Not those things specifically, of course. But their balance of fun vs. responsibility is about the same.

If you filter out those activities which the mane 6 engage in exclusively for the sake of appealing to their primary audience of children, nothing else about their personalities, day-today activities, or level of responsibility really says "child".
Sparkling
#233880
1 year ago
aaaaaaaaaa-yup
Doctor_Whooves
#233891
1 year ago
^^ day-to-day*
Anonymous
#233895
1 year ago
consider that Faust said the main cast were written to be 12-18.

also in the USA the unrestricted age of consent is 18. You have to be over 18 to feature in pornography, and you have to be within a certain age bracket to fuck anyone under 18. This bracket, IF it exists at all where you live, varies widely. Check your local laws before picking up jailbait at the bar.
Anonymous
#233902
1 year ago
excuse me, 18 or over. Not that any of that particularly matters here, just wanted to clear it up a bit.
Anonymous
#233905
1 year ago
Those images seems to be deleted now.
Sparkling
#233907
1 year ago
^If that is so, how you want the site to check if it is ok in more than (rough guess) 150 towns and cities.
Anonymous
#233927
1 year ago
you wouldn't have to, you'd only need to check the town/county/city/state where the site is hosted.
Doctor_Whooves
#233929
1 year ago
^^^^ From what I've read that isn't the case. You're right about the age to be featured in pornography/etc., however the age of consent is determined at the state-level and in many (most, apparently) it's actually 16: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America#United_States

Close-in-age exemptions tend to exist for the opposite purpose of what you've described, so that someone isn't unjustly charged with statutory rape (which happens in those silly places which have no close-in-age exemptions)... for example an 18 or 19 year-old who sleeps with a 15 year-old. Or, in the case of places with an age of consent of 18, a 21 or 22 year-old that sleeps with a 17 year-old.
Strat
#233932
1 year ago
Oh Edef, your stoicism never ceases to amaze me. ^_^
Doctor_Whooves
#233938
1 year ago
The only times it usually becomes 18 in those place with an AOC of 16 is when the older person is in a position of authority... teacher/etc. But in any other case, by and large, you don't have to be "within a certain bracket", or else the age of consent would just be 18 anyway. If it's 16 in a state, that's pretty much it.
Sparkling
#233943
1 year ago
^^^That is right.
^^ Ok so that problem is solved. Now ther problem what to do with it.
Anonymous
#233949
1 year ago
I dont think we should raise the pedophilia card here... PETA is all ready giving us the stare.
Sparkling
#233951
1 year ago
^^^^^^Yup thats true.
Edef
#233959
1 year ago
Real-world laws don't apply here. Those images are legal for the same reason cub porn (furry fandom) is legal, although I don't know that reason off hand.
Sparkling
#233964
1 year ago
Well if that is so, why the pics are removed?
Doctor_Whooves
#233965
1 year ago
Even drawings of human children in sexual situations are legal in a lot of the world, for whatever crazy reasons. So yeah, these images can't be illegal either. They're just in relatively poor taste.
Edef
#233973
1 year ago
@sparkling

Because the mods are retarted.
idkfa
#233974
1 year ago
@Doctor_Whooves: I was speaking as generally as possible. Once you are over 18 you are legal everywhere, and so unrestricted.

I have no idea where you inferred the close-in exemption thing. I'm pretty sure the joke I used is valid.
Sparkling
#233978
1 year ago
Ok but if you chanhe the persons (exept rainbow) Whats then new story?
Sparkling
#233990
1 year ago
@edef: Thats an very good reason
@idkfa: Take in mind that furry is younger then those pics...
Anonymous
#233992
1 year ago
Generally it's thought that nonhuman pedo is legal because it's not human and it's pretend and that's okay and stuff but really it depends on the laws. In many cases in the USA the fact that it depicts minors makes it contraband, not what went into making it. The PROTECT act for example has language that allows prosecution for digitally created images.
Anonymous
#234000
1 year ago
oh and the PROTECT act is federal, so it most certainly does apply to ponibooru.
Sparkling
#234010
1 year ago
So ponibooru can get sued?
MagicMarker
#234012
1 year ago
Why are you guys wasting your time arguing about porn? It's Rule 34. "If it exists there's Porn of it". It's like a natural law of the interwebs by now. If you don't like the porn then DON'T CLICK ON EXPLICIT MARKED IMAGES. And don't go around bitching and moaning about how there's more porn than 'Normal Art.' Besides, new filter thingy, try it out.

The porn that hasn't been posted here will get posted, things will return to normal, as normal as a booru site can get anyways, and eventually we'll all have a new Skywind or Rayo pic to freak out over. That sound good guys? <:3c
Anonymous
#234014
1 year ago
^Only Celestia is legal.
Doctor_Whooves
#234020
1 year ago
^ Even if you don't personally think the mane six are, what about Luna, Mayor Mare, and Granny Smith? I'd bet Celestia's Royal Guards would be, for sure. Probably Mr. Breezy, too.

Oh, and Cheerilee is an 80s kid, so she's legal :P
Sparkling
#234023
1 year ago
^^You know how it started? It started as an discusion about the qaulity of pics.
Edef
#234025
1 year ago
If this PROTECT act did anything, then the various furry sites and that cub porn mag would have been shut down.
Sparkling
#234030
1 year ago
Thats right, but not much changed so i think this is gonna to do zero.
MagicMarker
#234035
1 year ago
@Sparkling

Actually it looks like a few people said the tl;dr version of what I just said, then people talked about quality, then someone decided to srs the hell out of the whole thing by dragging politics into it. <:3c
Anonymous
#234036
1 year ago
@Sparkling: No, Ponibooru can get raided, shut down, and Eco(And a bunch of others, likely) can get tossed in the slammer. Technically.

@MagicMarker: Hey why don't you just ignore those Skywind/whatever pictures if you don't like them? You can just ignore them! Everything is sunshine and rainbows if you just ignore everything you don't like!
Sparkling
#234048
1 year ago
@magicmarker:
Nah we dunno know what that politics was about. And besides, the pics are gone.
Sparkling
#234053
1 year ago
^it was post 40.
MagicMarker
#234054
1 year ago
@035

Well gee mister Anon you sure are right! 83c Maybe we can learn to do the same thing with comments we dislike too! Hooray! ^w^ <333
Sparkling
#234062
1 year ago
^WTF IS THIS FOR COMMENT???
Anonymous
#234069
1 year ago
@Sparkling:
I'll reupload them later on if people cant come up with conclusion. The rule34.paheal.net is down anyways.
Anonymous
#234070
1 year ago
@Edef: Generally speaking I agree. When or if they go down those charges will be filed as part of a big huge long list that includes actual child abuse charges.
MagicMarker
#234071
1 year ago
@Sparkling

Obviously you haven't seen me comment before, unlike most people I comment in an innocent and overly happy way to hide my inner demons and cynicism towards everyone. YAY! 83c

*Also it was Mr. 036 I was responding too. Oops. <:3c
Anonymous
#234076
1 year ago
@MagicMarker: I'm glad you agree with me about how ridiculous the "Ignore it" argument is.
Sparkling
#234080
1 year ago
Ok thats true but still i don't get it.
MagicMarker
#234087
1 year ago
@076

Never said I agreed with you Mr. Anon, and I was joking about the Rayo and Skywind thing to be honest though, I'm still serious (or as serious as smeone can be when talking about multicoloured equines) when I said people should just try to deal with the porn thing without throwing a nasty hissy fit over it though.

Sorry, but it's just my opinion. <:3c
Sparkling
#234091
1 year ago
Youre right.
Derpyderp
#234098
1 year ago
I went to the front page today and nearly had a heart attack! this pc is set up in my living room damnit -.-
Sparkling
#234101
1 year ago
But why the heart attack?
Derpyderp
#234106
1 year ago
^My parents were in the living room
Sparkling
#234115
1 year ago
Well that sucks. But what do you saw?
Anonymous
#234116
1 year ago
Asking everyone to simply ignore everything they vaguely dislike is pretty much the same thing as saying "Don't say anything negative at all ever."
Derpyderp
#234120
1 year ago
^went to front page and first thumbnail was topless RD and AJ
Sparkling
#234121
1 year ago
So whats the meaning of that?
Derpyderp
#234122
1 year ago
^ *humanized topless RD and AJ
Sparkling
#234124
1 year ago
^Well that sucks really bad.
Strat
#234144
1 year ago
Guys, what exactly are we arguing about?
Anonymous
#234151
1 year ago
Ponies ages and how artist should draw what we like instead.
Anonymous
#234153
1 year ago
The prediction is almost kinda true though. Look here >>25889
Sparkling
#234157
1 year ago
^^nothing
^is this the pic title again
Anonymous
#234171
1 year ago
Edef
#234185
1 year ago
^ I concur.
Sparkling
#234186
1 year ago
Whats that pic?
Anonymous
#234190
1 year ago
the best part for me is that this is just day 2 and I'm expecting it to ramp up as word spreads.
Sparkling
#234195
1 year ago
Whats it?
Jackarunda
#234550
1 year ago

You spelled ridiculous wrong, dumbass!

Razyn
#234806
1 year ago
Make a pun based on the color of a filter image.

Get called a dumbass for spelling it wrong.


LOLWUT.
DJ_Paradroid
#235201
1 year ago
I'm a little depressed by the whole thing, actually. I feel less likely to post what I create here. It's not that I have anything against people creating more blue images with the franchise; freedom of expression and all that but by doing so I kind of off-handedly support it?

I don't know, this is all a little confronting. Of course I know that I could too create things that people would find confronting or challenging. Can't really express my feelings clearly about all this. Hope it doesn't kill the board, really.
0r0ch1
#235498
1 year ago
lol
Anonymous
#235547
1 year ago
People seriously get depressed over porn?
DJ_Paradroid
#235564
1 year ago
People are gibbering masses of neuroses. At least I am.
Lockstep
#235616
1 year ago
There's porn here. Fine. I filter it, and I never have to see it. This site isn't the first thing I would show someone I'm introducing to MLP, anyway. If I did show 'em, I'd just log in to turn the filter on, and head to my favorites. If someone wants to point at the porn as proof of how 'disturbed' bronies are, they already have an agenda--they can find it here and in a hundred different places.

I don't imply support for anything but ponies by just being here. Anyone who would accuse someone of supporting the porn by visiting this website is a douche.

The update makes it easier for me to avoid what I don't want to see. I'm not going to whine anymore about it just existing.

Everyone who likes the porn is loved. They're no less brony than anyone else. I don't care if the fandom is labeled as deviant or 'furry' (as if furries are evil) or whatever, because I'm not, and nobody's gonna convince me any differently.

The end.
DJ_Paradroid
#235797
1 year ago
Yes, I have to retract my statement actually. This has caused me to actually bother with my own filter settings and now I don't need to damage my delicate little sensibilities with images I don't care to see.

There is no excuse for laziness on anyone's behalf. We're all (or pretend to be) adults and should take responsibility for our actions and choices. Now I'm going to go try to get this damn fever down; Winter needs to just wrap up.
Anonymous
#236464
1 year ago
Some people judge a site by the entirety of its contents, not just the stuff they like or dislike.

It's called being honest.
Anonymous
#243785
1 year ago
@sparkling youre 14 >..<