
| Ninestempest #157339 1 year ago |
dat low cost |
| Anonymous #157355 1 year ago |
Why not just make her a Planeswalker? |
| Mellowcorks #157359 1 year ago |
Isn't "Unicorn Horse" kind of redundant? |
| Anonymous #157364 1 year ago |
Not when you have those separate creature types at MtG. |
| Kyouhen #157378 1 year ago |
Just tossing this out there, but when M12 hits that ability's going to be labelled 'Hexproof'. Y'know, in case you wanted to get in on that now. :P |
| Anonymous #157383 1 year ago |
Allready known, but he wanted to keep the "vintage" wording, like on cards like Autum willow. |
| Anonymous #157387 1 year ago |
@anon359
No more redundant than "pegasus pony" or "unicorn pony." |
| Anonymous #157428 1 year ago |
I think it should read "divine alicorn" or "alicorn demigod" |
| yawg07 #157591 1 year ago |
You don't need "All" in the troll-shroud ability line.
I kind of feel like she could be a 6/6 and still have the same abilities. |
| Anonymous #157749 1 year ago |
^
We plan on gather amoney with UotC and print the cards and test them, alone and with real cards to see how they behave. But this will be in the middle term |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #157781 1 year ago |
@ Ninestempest: +[U]+[B]+[R]+[G]&output=spoiler&method=visual&type=+[Creature]&sort=cmc+]a 5/5 with some nasty abilities for WUBRG is par for the course. Plus, she's got the "legendary" downside, so the 6/6 suggested by yawg07 would still be OK. |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #157918 1 year ago |
Argh, the brackets in the link destroyed the formatting. I'll just pick two then. |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #157921 1 year ago |
O_O |
| YandereShy #158027 1 year ago |
Her ability is awesome but her cost is very hard to come by, i wouldn't user her just cause of that. |
| YandereShy #158028 1 year ago |
*use
damn it |
| Dark #158207 1 year ago |
Don't worry, I'll use her as my Commander ;) |
| Anonymous #159058 1 year ago |
Anon1: My thought exactly. The princesses are planeswalkers, not summonable creatures. |