Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Flammie
#386826
11 months ago
Yay indeed!
Anonymous
#386838
11 months ago
Should be white green...
Anonymous
#386849
11 months ago
get that comma outta there
FanOfMostEverything
#387066
11 months ago
Plusses: Derpy watermark
Dat flavor text

Minuses: Far too expensive. After adjusting for color, I'd recommend 1GW.
This is non-enraged Fluttershy. Consider making her a 0/3 or 0/4, and maybe make that protection from creatures in general.
If the subject the card is speaking in the flavor text, you don't have to attribute the quote.
Templating fail. Use the following: "GW, T: Put a 0/1 white Bird creature token with flying or a 1/1 white Rabbit creature token onto the battlefield." Also, consider making the bunnies green.
pervotron2000
#388658
11 months ago
Why's the tags for the next image mixed in with this one's? Fixed.
Anonymous
#389461
11 months ago
Overcosted. This could cost 2 less, and it still wouldn't be overpowered.
Gregorius
#701341
8 months ago
First off, should be G/W, as everyone's saying.

Secondly, you could definitely lower the mana cost by at least one. Flying helps Fluttershy 'cause she's a pegasus, sure, but protection from Beasts is a very niche ability; it'll have an effect on play, but not always (also, protection should not have been capitalized).

Third—and this annoys me more than anything when dealing with amateur card makers—if you are given a choice between one of two effects in the same ability, you label it as "Choose one — [effect #1]; or [effect #2]". Hell, you can add more effects if you want; it doesn't matter.

Finally, when dealing with character quotes or excerpts from other sources, you put the quote above, the source that quote was from below, and a soft break [that's SHIFT + ENTER in MSE] separating them so it looks like this:

"It needs to be about 20% cooler."
— Rainbow Dash