Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#29347
1 year ago
bad
Anonymous
#29351
1 year ago
haha i clicked on this before it got flagged.
Anonymous
#29356
1 year ago
Someone please put an explicit or questionable tag on this garbage.
Anonymous
#29367
1 year ago
artist fetishizes children. artist is a pedophile. i await the shitty white knight trolls who will validate this. imad. fuck off.

I'm a bit jaded.
Anonymous
#29373
1 year ago
Oh wibble. It's amusing how much people raeg and makes claims because they don't like a particular style or claim it offends their subjective sensibilities.

Likewise, if it irks you that much, tag it your own damn self. At least, 'till someone else changes it back, of course...
Anonymous
#29375
1 year ago
Meh, Saucy CMC fan-art is less offensive when their past puberty.
Anonymous
#29382
1 year ago
Creepy art style with lazy side-of-head sonic mouth.
Anonymous
#29389
1 year ago
cute & saved
Anonymous
#29408
1 year ago
the community does not disappoint. a white knight appears, claiming the dislike for the image amuses him. means he wants to establish his fake, pop nihilism early on. he wants to create the image that he does not care, simply observes the horde as they clatter. third rate, intro level trolling. i've seen better shit on something awful's gbs. sad.

claims that the offensive subject is subjective. Up to ones own interpretation. a easy out for pedophiles, especially when they are furries. there is no law that protects cartoon animal children from passive aggressive predators. if they fantasize about that, they can freely talk about it on the internet without as much stigmata.

tries to guilt the counter troll into thinking he is bias. too vanilla for the subject. too sensitive. fails to anticipate that the person calling him out knows his fucking kinks, could care less about people's fetishes, but only cares when fuckers get off on destroying a child's innocence.

he finishes his post by insinuating that they are some kind of fucking legion, a giant group of like minded individuals who will stop at nothing to prevent the re tagging of this image. Obviously it's just a handful of obsessed assholes deluding themselves into thinking they are sane.

in the end, nothing is really gained. nothing is lost. some dickless fuck embarrasses himself. maybe has a 2 minute existential crisis. then continues his degenerate spree. the internet doesn't change. sad.

am i mad? you better fucking believe i am mad.
Anonymous
#29449
1 year ago
Scootaloo doesn't have breasts, but pecs instead.

For some reason that just makes the image seem LESS weird to me.
Anonymous
#29476
1 year ago
^^ why so serious?
Anonymous
#29490
1 year ago
itwasonlyamatteroftime.jpg
Anonymous
#29871
1 year ago
No.
Anonymous
#30095
1 year ago
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPE
Anonymous
#30175
1 year ago
^Anonymous 4/9 needs to realize that the rest of the world is shit and just stfu and deal with it like the rest of us that hate other people
Anonymous
#30179
1 year ago
LOLWUT
Anonymous
#30332
1 year ago
Applejackface.jpg
Anonymous
#30382
1 year ago
If I could draw I would rate this as 7.6/10

But I can't draw so my opinion is invalid
Anonymous
#31971
1 year ago
Personally, I don't have an issue with (tween - teen) loli-ish images. I suppose it's a bit of a fetish. But for me, I'm more attracted to the idea/fantasy of being the "loli" (I'm female). Maybe it's because I struggle with being submissive, which is a common theme in loli art (submissiveness and innocence). Maybe it's because I became sexually active at 13. Maybe I just find cuteness sexually appealing.
I do know that it has nothing to do with being sexually attracted to children.

Loli/cub art is simply fantasy.

And this image isn't thaaat bad as far as loli goes. While the actual, canon, characters may be young... here they've been depicted as older. By the looks of their rears, hips, legs, and boobs... thirteen or fourteen maybe.

Annnyyyways. The picture still sucks. With the four fingers, side mouth, far-apart-eyes, plastic boobs, and tail-in-butt... Ehhh. No.
Anonymous
#31976
1 year ago
Well, it's been fun, Ponibooru, but this place has just gotten far too weird for me.

Have fun ponyin'!
Anonymous
#33133
1 year ago
AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO NIPPLES OR VAGINA THEN IT IS OKAY
Anonymous
#33885
1 year ago
New Ponibooru drinking game: whenever someone says something stupid on Ponibooru, you take a drink

(Read: drink all the fucking time)
MyLittleJosieph
#33891
1 year ago
Does this drinking game involve taking a swig of...Applejack? :)
Anonymous
#34969
1 year ago
Guhuh!
Anonymous
#35113
1 year ago
aaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous
#35115
1 year ago
BY CELESTIA! EITHER YOU DRAW PONIES OR YOU DRAW HUMAN VERSIONS OF PONIES YOU CANT DO BOTH AT THE SAME TIME OR IT ENDS UP LOOKING LIKE THIS CRAP!
Anonymous
#39469
1 year ago
^^^^^ (i think) i'm the guy who posted the original ridiculous whatever thing (anon 9)

can i play the game if i already drink all day, every day?

also, to the guy who posted the Post Of The Month (you know which one), i have a special message for u.

i'll be honest. i have a problem. pedophilia pissed me off. it goes far beyond simple hatred of criminals. i hate anyone who tries to fuck with children. something to do with my own shitty childhood + intelligence and knowledge of what shit like this does to kids. but you have somehow evolved past my hatred and entered the realm of the fucking absurd. you are so weird that i can't even dislike you. i wouldn't even know where to begin with you. i could write an entire paper on just that post alone. you are a strange fucking person. Jeez.
Thaluka
#46328
1 year ago
horrible
Anonymous
#46329
1 year ago
you all know most of the big posts in this thread are pasta right?

just checking
Anonymous
#71681
1 year ago
once again...DAMN ALL YOU FILLI-CON!
Anonymous
#95781
1 year ago
FINDING YOUR NIPPLES CUTIE MARK!
Anonymous
#168134
1 year ago
@#35115 It's not all crap, though I can see why some people would be upset at this particular image, in more ways than one.

Love and Tolerate, guys.
Anonymous
#168296
1 year ago
if you post that on an image that isn't nude children it might have more impact.
Anonymous
#179705
1 year ago
Fun fact: drawings aren't children. This isn't even all that explicit. Cartoon butts aren't really anything to write home about.
No children are being harmed, no fictional children are even being harmed.
Anonymous
#220609
1 year ago
The CMC should preferably be flat. They're still kinda young. Mimi is the only loli with breasts that can get away with it.