
| PhilosopherRob #233182 1 year ago |
I hate both. -___- |
| Anonymous #233207 1 year ago |
Sums up the pony fandom very well. |
| BGPony17 #233292 1 year ago |
Doesn't do too bad a job on the furry fandom, either. |
| Flutterguy #233313 1 year ago |
Horse penis or elephant trunk, you decide |
| redweasel #233426 1 year ago |
hoersisfinetoo.jpg |
| Sparkling #233442 1 year ago |
Do them both. |
| ChoppersTopHat #233772 1 year ago |
I am disturbed by this image.
However I am also disturbed by the fact that he probably WOULD call it a party hole. |
| Anonymous #234635 1 year ago |
This is what the author wants to think. It's a common tactic of creating an "obviously" flawed and mockable enemy and misinterpreting anyone who criticizes anything he likes as said enemy to ignore their actual opinion. |
| GlitterGlue #235160 1 year ago |
Anon, the point stands that anyone who thinks removing animal features from something sexual makes it MORE perverse (or more furry, or more zoophilic) has their priorities out of order at best. |
| Doctor_Whooves #235178 1 year ago |
Uh oh; if you don`t order your priorities in the way GlitterGlue approves of, then WATCH OUT!!! :P
As always, people will be attracted to whatever it is they`re attracted to. I`ve never seen anyone argue that the furry or anthro or whatever you want to call them are `more perverse`, simply that it doesn`t do it for them. No harm, no foul. It`s none of your business what they like, nor is it any of mine, or anyone else`s but their own. In short, GlitterGlue, deal with it. |
| GlitterGlue #235700 1 year ago |
You're taking part in an argument you didn't even witness, getting bent out of shape over a joke image. If anyone needs to learn to deal with it, it sure isn't me. |
| Anonymous #236589 1 year ago |
I like this joke! It makes sense. |
| Doctor_Whooves #236983 1 year ago |
^^ I'm not the one uploading an image and claiming to have authority (or that any absolute authority exists at all, which it most certainly does not) over determining the "proper" way/order/hierarchy for people to be attracted to things.
So yeah, I do get bent out of shape when I see people trying to dictate or judge how others go about their business. I'd rather live my own life, rather than tell other people how to live theirs. There is no "argument" over the subject matter of this image, because it was never worth commenting on in the first place. Who cares what they fap to? |
| GlitterGlue #237257 1 year ago |
You've missed the point so badly you're arguing against what is essentially the reverse. |
| Doctor_Whooves #237260 1 year ago |
^ heh; anon 635 was right about you.
Enjoy raging against the Internet, fucktard. |
| GlitterGlue #237785 1 year ago |
Goodness, what language. Swearing to prove a point, and you call others mad. |
| Turnways_Flip #293113 1 year ago |
Clearly, the Doctor posting here is actually the Master in disguise, trying to make the Doctor look like an incompetent oaf who would rather insult people trying to make the same point as him than comprehend a situation. |
| Anonymous #449677 10 months ago |
glitterglue, he's right, you can't just say something is more perverse, because many people like the furry fandom and many people don't. Therefore, since a large group like it and it isn't a one-time thing for them, it is considered not perverse. Also, remember who you are arguing against. You'll never win. |
| makoruu #666858 8 months ago |
Seems legit. |
| TheGlueFactory #783089 7 months ago |
I'm with the Doctor on this one: insulting furries is a waste of time since they will continue liking what they like regardless...just as people will continue to hate furies regardless of what they have to say. My advice is to add the appropriate tags to your flier list, and try not to get so butt-hurt over what other people like. |
| Anonymous #994078 5 months ago |
Anyway, this image doesn't really need a discussion about this, as it's really just a sarcastic joke pic. *Pinkie shrug* |