Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#521983
9 months ago
These were stupid before and they're stupid now.
Anonymous
#522003
9 months ago
yes, they I agree.
Anonymous
#522008
9 months ago
Ah, crap. I meant to say "yes, they are", then I changed my mind to "I agree."

Headcanon isn't really... "valid" unless it's written by the creators themselves. A better term would be "headfanon."
dudemang
#522020
9 months ago
Headcanon refers to the canon inside one's head which is true to a single person. I like to think of it as the singular of "fanon", which is group-oriented and thus will have uncertainty and disagreement, whereas a "headcanon" will probably be binary - you either believe it or no.

Though I agree that most of these aren't really all that worthwhile. MY LITTLE PONY SECRETLY PROMOTES RACISM, GAIS.
Anonymous
#522022
9 months ago
^It's a little redundant. The head part already implies it's made-up
Anonymous
#522024
9 months ago
ninja'd
DeeperMadness
#522043
9 months ago
Wouldn't calling him "Pony" be the same as referring to him as "Bloke" if he were human? So, "my mate, Joe", "Top Bloke Joe" or even: "Hey, Joe. You all right, dude?" but suited for pony use.
LordBristle
#522052
9 months ago
LookatallthefucksIgive.jpg
Anonymous
#522067
9 months ago
Ere' mait, jes bumme nutta java, ye?
Anonymous
#522070
9 months ago
^^^ It's more like Nigger Jim.
Anonymous
#522083
9 months ago
Dragon_Tosser
#522504
9 months ago
considering ponies are miniature horses, I'd think it'd be the equivalent of calling him "Midget Joe" in human terms.
Anonymous
#524031
9 months ago
this shit is stupid and you should feel stupid
Anonymous
#525549
9 months ago
Please don't vandalize the tags of things perfectly allowed by the rules just because you don't personally like them.