
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #101742 1 year ago |
Update of 10167 with the modern clear frame used for colorless non-artifact cards and cleaner wording.
Does anyone know an episode where you can see Derpy a) looking at the camera b) derping c) smiling d) in the foreground or in HD? I'd rather use a more friendly-looking shot. A higher-res muffin would be great, too... |
| Anonymous #101761 1 year ago |
a) Green isn't your colour
b)Feeling pinky keen or ep 1 c) Again Feeling pinkie keen or applebuck season d) applebuck season, good sized shot |
| Spitfire #101787 1 year ago |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-ih60vHh5c&feature=player_embedded Video of Derpy smiling. (Sort of looking forward)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTYaM3_wJpg&feature=related Assorted Derpy Sorry, not the best quality. |
| Spitfire #101788 1 year ago |
FUUCK |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #101818 1 year ago |
Thanks, anon and Spitfire, I'll look them up!
(I am looking for a scene where Derpy fulfills all four conditions at once. Don't know if one exists.) |
| Anonymous #103787 1 year ago |
well, the best moment for that would be feeling pinkie keen right after the piano drop.
though I really like the idea of two derpy cards. Its been a while since I've plated MTG so i'm not sure if double-sized cards now indeed exist; but if not, i'm seeing a derpy hooves card who spawns a filly and does something with a muffin, and a ditzy doo who spawns the muffin but does something with the filly. |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #104165 1 year ago |
^ Sounds like a fun and elegant concept. Wanna give it a try? |
| keiya #120554 1 year ago |
If the muffin doesn't have a type, why is "Muffin" in its typeline? |
| Anonymous #156388 1 year ago |
For the whole 'typeless' token issue: since we're talking non-official sets already, there's always the option of creating a new supertype. The Muffin Token here, for example, could have the typeline:
Food -- Muffin As it's got an actual permanent type, you can refer to it by type, give it colo(u)r, or even base an effect on the number of Food permanents you control! |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #373294 11 months ago |
@ #156388:
You probably won't read this, but: good idea - I'll adopt it! |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #373348 11 months ago |
By the way, just adding a supertype doesn't give the card a type; those tokens would still be typeless. I'll still give them a supertype for convenience's sake; it would also permit me to gloss over the fact that they are typeless, much like Wizards did with the hackier aspects of Tribal. |
| Invisible_Pink_Unicorn #373363 11 months ago |
Hmm. The supertype complicates things. I think just creating a new type is probably the better solution.
@ Keiya: "Muffin" is a subtype. |