From: "Einhorn Servant" Subject: corected version of my essay Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 About average horsepeople and zoophiles Average horsepeople get their kicks out of dominating other beings such as horses. They obviously enjoy making a horse do what they want (as displayed shamelessly in dressage for example). As child-abusers and bestialists (animal-rapers) alike, average horsepeople only care about other individual's free wills to a limited extent in order to have their own will win over and destroy the will of their subordinates. This is usually acquired by a more or less sadistic cruelty which one can often find displayed openly among playing children. In average horsepeople, these ways are still the psychological means to gain their stupid and lowly goals of unnecessary domination and rulership. The more powerful or masculine (such as a stallion) a living being is, the more perverted joy is generated in average horsepeople by being able to dominate it, supposedly giving the controlling person that masculine power which he or she is dominating. Most often this seems to be "the weak sex" who is in need of this kind of masculine power substitute. Now don't get me wrong; I don't think women are inferior to men. I'm not a macho and I really belive the women's rights movement is basically a great thing! But aside from all the attention to women's rights, I'd like to make women (and some men!) aware of a male right of a free sexuality -- if this sexuality does not hurt or hinder anyone (human or non-human!). I belive this right exists not only for humans but for all males (and females) who are intact in their genitals! Unfortunately exactly women who have had to (and still do) live under oppression by society are totally unable (due to the lack of having testicles) to understand or even feel with this basic right of any testicle owner. But by God, if men as opposed to women have so many difficulties to talk about feelings, then who on earth is going to represent the true and unknown feelings of males and their right of this free sexuality in our culture? No one!!! That's why a really free sexuality for males which includes sex from, to and with any available species who is capable of love has never been accepted in our society where cowardly men rather cut off parts of other males' genital organs than finding out a way to relieve those males' sexual pressure, and at the same time, creating great joy and happiness which I belive will be held high in value (some day) not only by the loved animal! Women who unfortunately for all males do not have an active drive and pressure for sex as most males have, often think that sex (besides for impregnating them) is not only unnecessary but quite often even a nuisance. So naturally when they see a human in a sexual activity with an animal, they not only think that the animal must be bothered by this, but also that the human engaging in this action must be sick in his mind to think that the animal might even like this! And all this just because of a lack of understanding of love and sexuality of God's beings! Now how could women possibly understand that sex can be a great pressure relief and joy, especially when it's connected to loving intimacy with another trusted living being, not only for human males but for all animals? How can they ever understand that allowing oneself to give this relief and bonding joy, not only to oneself, but also to others, is basically a good thing, when they have never felt a sexual pressure, and worse yet, if they have never felt the loneliness around their animal's genitals and hearts which belong together? How can women understand that giving this relief to both genitals and heart (for example with masturbation) is, and taking it away for ever (castration), is not a good thing, when they have never felt the divine power and joy of an intense male orgasm as only males seem to be able to experience? I'm not saying women can't have orgasms. They can even have a lot more in quantity than men which is proven. But unfortunately many of them simply can't experience and enjoy orgasms in the quality and the way males can. (Although some human females seem to be quite good at imitating male orgasmic behavior.) Average horsepeople and many animal owners who are generally only interested in their own needs and goals indeed share a major part of their psychological disposition (if not the earthly goals) with the bestialist. This is probably the reason why average horsepeople and animal owners think that any sex with animals is bestial and rape. Since they don't know of any better psychological disposition than their own, most often egoistic, self-centered and dominant relationship to animals, they naturally assume this same disposition of any other person or human-animal relationship! In context of this (sadly) for our culture "normal" relationship between humans and animals, it's extension into the sexual area is truly bestial and psychologically disgusting because it is rape and cruelty not only of the mind as generally accepted, but truly sexual, which rightfully sets off the big SEXUAL RAPE alarm! (Which sadly is the only rape alarm our society has for animals!) Never in their minds could average horsepeople and animal owners even suspect that a different psychological disposition than what their own self-centered, respectless, egotistic, dominant and often exploiting relationship to animals reflects could be possible! They are truly not only poor in knowledge and respect for animals, but also in faith and knowledge of God and of his great inventions: Love and Sexuality! As opposed to the average horseperson or animal owner with this poor psychological disposition and his team-player the bestialist, the zoophile or zoosexual is an entire new invention of a relationship between animals and humans! It is a non-profit orientated relationship of giving and taking respect, love, affection and maybe intimacy. This new kind of relationship may not be new to other cultures and religions and is definitely not new to God, but obviously new and unknown to most Christian, Jewish and Moslem people who tend to slay God's unknown wonders before getting to know them! It seems to be true now that the average horseperson and the zoophile both look and hunt for a recognition which they seem to be unable to get from a humans-only environment for whatever reason but only from a relationship between human and animal. The signifficant difference though, between the average horseperson and the zoophile, is not only the quality of this sought-after recognition but just as importantly, the means which are used to obtain this recognition. Average horsepeople hunt for recognition by enjoying control and dominance over their subordinates. Zoophiles hunt for recognition primarily from animal friends by trying to serve and please them as much as possible, just as a good and caring lover should do. Now please don't say: "But love and sex between animals and humans is unnatural!" Is it natural for horses that a predator rides on their backs and controls their movements for years before he finally kills them? Is it natural for horses to get their lust for food satisfied by a human with concentrated corn in an artificial plastic container? Decide yourself: What is more natural? -Loving and caring affection and tender loving between two equally fulfillment seeking minds that might lead to a passionate love and therefore satisfying sex for both partners such as demonstrated by zoophiles. Or: -The disgusting porno-factory-like semen collection from enslaved stallion captives whose hearts are drained of all warmth and hope by cold metal mare-substitutes and greased plastic tubes held by coldhearted and uncaring factory workers who don't want to try the Crump-method. (Not because it might be a financial disadvantage but because of social cowardliness and because their hearts are too small to be put into their jobs by milking a stallion with their hands, hearts and caring affection which would heal the hearts of many stallions!) -The inhumane coldness with which average horsepeople walk by or even laugh at the loneliness at heart which a mare is experiencing when she is in heat and of desperate need of a caring and God-filled individual who has enough warmth in his heart to kiss and caress her frog to turn her into a happily satisfied little princess. - Instead she might be restrained and get a plastic tube slid right by her desperately needing clitoris from a love- and God-denyingly ignorant person who fertilizes her with a foreigner's semen and his or her own vast coldness at heart and lack of belief. -Drawing blood from a stallion's penis by whipping it to punish him for getting an erection for the friendly person who had released him from the walking machine after hours of forced walking in a blistering heat. (Mind you: This was one of the rare stallions, who had a most unusual record for thoroughbred stallions at stud, of being extremely friendly and peaceful with people (even children). He just hated to be locked up in an isolated box stall which his new owner deliberately did to break his good and peaceful will!) Go ahead and make your own picture of how animals are treated in our society! But do it! Don't just watch what they show on television and think you will do it some day! To me it is clear as sunshine that real zoophiles should be elected above all others as the real animal protectionists! I believe they should not only be responsible for their own animals but also in charge of some minimal laws and their enforcement against animal cruelty (not only sexual rape!) because someone has to take responsibility for the animals that live under the domination of Homo sapiens and it's consequences! And who could do that better than true and dedicated lovers? Contact me if you wish at: einhornserv@hotmail.com PS: If you're not familiar with the Crump-method, the information at might allow you to get a visual idea of it. Written on November 16th 1997 by Einhorn Servant (a practical nurse for horses embedded in human society).