>>8385

You can get lung cancer without snorting asbestos, too, but it sure doesn't DECREASE your chances.

U da ho. U da big badass ho!

>>8351
well,let also make the distinction between someones fursona having sex vs the actual person.

I liked this thread better when someone was named and then 3 or 4 pics were shown of the same character. We are here to see sluts, not one pic of one character and then on to the next ;)

>>8847

Just click the link which shows 10, 20, and sometimes even 100's of pictures of that slut.

No mention of NecroDrone? I am disappoint

>>8963

I'm going out on a limb here, but gee, that MIGHT be because Necro is female and this is the male board.

>>7964
In response to the other half of this image,
#31: Razr

#32: Dragon Massiel

#33: Zaush's Kineta
(How did she not make it earlier?)

#34: Tojo-the-Thief

>>8995

You do know what board this is, right?

#35: Orona

Even the picture says hes a dirty filthy slut!

I wonder how I haven't shown up on here yet.

Huh, surprised I haven't shown up here.

Hell, there's a few obvious ones missing, too, like SecreT, Adjot, Williamca, BatCountry. Not that I have anything against most of those people, they're pretty cool.

As far as commission prices go? Y'all niggas must be poor to be so upset that someone will spend a hundred or more on the time of an artist they like.

Have you ever gone out to eat, and paid for it? Fuck, eating good sushi with a friend comes to like $40. A good date? $200, easy, on just the meal (with tip, and wine) and $30 on a movie with popcorn.

If it's okay to drop money like that on fleeting, hour-long experiences, why is it so crazy to drop it on something you can actually look at in the future? Oh no, there's no hard copy to keep in digital art?! The only hard copy you keep of food or seeing something at a theater or sports event is the shit you leave in the toilet, or a ticket stub. Whoop-dee-fucking do.

Maybe if you had a talent that people were willing to pay for, you'd have some money and could stop bitching with envy.

Slut means people who get porn just for porn, not caring with whom it is. Obviously adding points if the other is also a slut/popufur

Spending (00$ on a Nek0Gami commission is retarded, since you pay just for popularity, not the work done. Look at Sidian, she ain't as popular, yet her works are FAAAR better than mr. retardedjapanesenamewithl33tsp33k, at a fraction of the price.

Anyway sheesh it's just art :P

Sure, it makes you kinda envious but... yeah xD

>>7967
Cheers for the loving, anon!

>>9203
On that note, Cenny. ->
http://www.furaffinity.net/gallery/cenny/

His entire FA gallery is the product of entering EVERY "free art!" contest ever. Wins surprisingly often, and doesn't seem to care who else gets thrown in the picture. E>>9203
ven ended up in an orgy commission my girlfriend did.

... Also, you're talking about Sidian, but showing a picture by Synrioth.

>>9197

Too many misconceptions with this post =) One is to assume someone is poor or don't have the money because they won't spend outrageous amounts of money for something overpriced because of "name". Imo, a lot people don't know how to spend money wisely. Why spend $100 on a product because of the "name" when you can get the exact same product for $40? (As mentioned in the post right after yours) Take bottled water for instance. Waste of money. Just take tap water, put it in the refrigerator, and it tastes the same as bottled water (unless you live in like Mexico). I seen a lot of articles that show there is almost no difference between tap and bottled. Another good example are online games. I seen games where you can change the color of your name for money. That's right, for nothing else, you get a different colored name for like $20-30. That's just a waste of money and plain retarded, even if you're rich.

I mean, i'm not here to tell you how to spend your money. But if you're paying $500 for a single digital picture, or throwing down $30 to change the color of your online name, people are not gonna be envious of you, they are gonna be laughing and trolling you for it as seen in this thread. I personally don't care (and in fact i encourage more commissions, because more commissions = more prons! = more sluts), but i completely can see why a lot of posters in here are trolling those who spend outrageous amounts of money for a "brand name".

Not that i mind people spending outrageous amounts of money though. =) I used to sell bootleg dvdrips of movies for $10 per dvd. Imo, those weren't even worth $1, but if people are willing to pay $10, then why not!

On a final note. You can have a good date with $0, and all furry sluts rock! Post on.

Special rule #34 slut: Bowser

I've seen him with practically every other rule 34 character and a lot of furries out there. He's probably the only fictional character with real life STD's

>>9197

Secret was mentioned >>7728

>>9332

There's no "exact same product" from a different source when it comes to art. Unless all the artists in question are equally bad, derivative of each other, and don't have a unique approach of their own (yes, it happens far too often). Or if the commissioner doesn't care about quality (this also happens far too often). Generally, people will commission their favorite artists, not the ones with the lowest rates.

It just happens so that popular artists have better visibility, they have a bigger "fanbase" which translates to a bigger demand, to control the demand they rise the price. It's not the quality that allows them to charge more and get away with it, it's the quantity of commissioners.

This thread makes my dick rock hard.

>>9197
>Adjot
>Slut

You do realise that he only has one picture where his character(s) isn't fuckin (or in the same image as) his boyfriend's character(s), right?

>>9197
THIS
Keep up the good work, sluts!

#36 Kusacwolf

Another slut to add to the collection!

So much butthurt up in here. Just shut up and post more sluts.

Another slut!

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/ryan~/

>>8847
I agree. Theres no proof on the whole slut thing, just someone tossing out a random picture and claiming someones a slut. I think the proof just makes it all the juicier. Multiple pix please ;D

#38

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/larathen

His mouth only has one purpose, and it's not for eating/talking

What about the big slut Fuzzyroo? Surely his rump's on a constant automatic cum drip.

Slut #39 - Volkin
furaffinity.net/user/volkin

Slut #40 - ralarare
furaffinity.net/user/ralarare

Must get on this list.....

#41 GrizzlyMidnight

bump

Slut #42 - daxterdingo
furaffinity.net/user/daxterdingo

A slut is someone who mindlessly has sex with anyone they see that is attractive to them.

Someone who has sex ONLY with people they know personally is not a slut. Just letting you guys know that, not saying that I see anyone that isn't a slut.

Also, "whore" means they get payed.

>>14797

Your personal definition is not the universal one. Who do you think you are, God?

Technically, "slut" is defined as an immoral woman, or possibly a synonym for "prostitute". All other definitions, such as the current one, are created by majority opinion of society.

(Also, if you're trying to convince yourself that you're not a "slut" because you have unattached sex with large numbers of people, but only those that you know, I will now proceed to laugh heartily.)