it sucks that the comic won't be finished because it's good but haha, wow, what a spineless person

>>34554
not like it was getting anywhere to begin with. the commissioner is fine to have it done how they want (and cool for trying to create depth of character where there wasn't any), but flaunting it out as porn and never delivering is just asking for this result

DaiGaijin posted a reply to a question on one of his FA commission journals, the comic is continuing as normal. He's just not making it publically available anymore because of how much hate it was generating, and some dick took the trouble to draw some offensive art aimed at the author. *shrug* the commissioner is still getting her comic, just we dont.

oh, yes we will. just a matter of time like everything else

Why are they complaining? It is a sexy well drawn comic that keeps me coming for more.

You haters just know how to be a buzz kill about a great comic so get trash something else

>>34564

>sexyy
>well drawn

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFF- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>>34567
uh yeah, lol

i mean the major problem with this comic is its totally unfappable and unsexy

thats why i love it so much

its a brilliant troll on the mouth breathers that consume this material

the funniest part is if daigaijin is getting all butt hurt and refusing to release any more... all that trolling was unintentional. they were actually trying to make a sexy comic and it came out garbage on accident

i always thought it was that way on purpose, to fuck with all y'all.

just lollin

>>34568
I know sooner or later I'll find the rest of this but why must
good things always be ruined by asshole tolls and or people who get butthurt way too easy.

>>34568
it isnt the artist getting butt hurt. the artist could care less.

its the person who commissioned the comic.

>>34557
at what point was this flaunted as porn? sure it had nakedness and naughtiness. but it was obvious from the start porn was never the focus. obvious to anyone with half a brain anyway.

>>34622

So.. Starting with an Erotic massage does not constitute a reason to expect porn. right.

And jumping out of an airplane doesn't mean you're hurtling towards the ground, Either I suppose.

>>34622
With a story, execution and jokes that poor, the only way the comic is decent is porn.

>>34628

I'd say all the nudity would make it a porn. I'm really sad. I really enjoyed this comic. I hope they release the whole thing once it is done.

>>34622

Right. So imagine this. You're going to a restaurant. The waiter is giving you a menu, you choose a dish. The scent is making your mouth water. After a frustrating one hour of waiting for your meal you ask the waiter what the fuck is going on. And then he replies: "Oh sorry. Where you expecting food? We never give any. If you look at our menu it says so in small font."

Dear LJ, today some people made fun of my furry porn on the Internet. Why is everyone so mean?!?!? Some day...everyone will pay millions for my work and I"ll show them all!!! Current mood: eating

>>34631

Right. So now imagine THIS.

Someone is holding a FREE OUTDOOR BARBEQUE! All you have to do is show up and eat. So you go there and look at what's on the grill... then you start complaining. "Where's my filet mignon?! Where's the red potato salad?! What, no fresh caught salmon wrapped in bacon?! WTF is *WRONG* with you!?" You scream and complain about EVERYTHING you're given, even though you haven't paid a cent for any of it, and the person is happily giving it to you for nothing. And you're not the only one.

Everyone who came is whining, crying, cursing, threatening action against the cook, who is only trying to share a bit of their bounty with people who don't have the ability to hold such an even themselves. They cringe, then explain they bought all the stuff already, so they can't just change the menu. Then they ask people to just calm down, which they all refuse to do, getting louder and more hostile. One of two even draw knives and threaten violence over not getting what they want... still forgetting they never paid a cent and the whole cookout is free.

The cook finally has had enough, and simply says, "Well, i'm sorry. I though I was doing you all a favor by giving you this when I didn't have to, but I guess I made a mistake. I'll take my stuff and go for now; maybe I'll set it up again once things calm down." Then they retreat from the near-mob, to the sounds of "What?! Now you're not even gonna feed us?! What a ripoff!" and "Aw, look at the poor baby wunning away from a little criticism! Come back and gimme my steak!" and "I didn't come all the way out here to get cut off before I get served! You *have* to serve me what I want before you go!" ...and then the person sponsoring the free cookout leaves.

The point I'm trying to make? You act as if you paid for this comic (quote: "imagine if you went to a restaurant". You didn't. You found this and started demanding things when it didn't go your way.) You act as if the artist is required to do what you want (quote: you call the waiter and ask what the hell is going on". You have NO CONTROL OR INVOLVEMENT IN THIS COMIC OTHER THAN WATCHING. Why do you feel you have a right to *demand* anything?) You act as if you can't read. (quote: And then he replies: "Oh sorry. Where you expecting food? We never give any. If you look at our menu it says so in small font." The artist explained after people started complaining that this was a commission, set in stone and not intended to just be "Po and Tigress fuck". She asked nicely, *before* any of this happened, for people to be patient, and to understand. And people lost their minds over it, offering threats and hostility. Over a fuckin' internet comic they didn't pay for.)

Your "example" here is wrong. If all the people who drove the artist to stop posting had spent some money on it, or had spoken to the original commissioner, asking for scenes to be added and offering money to make it happen, or had done SOMETHING to have a say in the comic, THEN your example would make sense. You aren't entitled to this comic. Not even the first page, much less the future ones. And because of dicks like you, you may never SEE another page. Congrats.

And shut the FUCK up.

*Slow wind-up clap*

>>34647

Shut up Angel.

Before you blow up entirely, try to figure out if they're really complaining about free stuff, or just issues 'adjacent' to the free stuff.
I for one usually stick to two types of criticism:
1) Constructive: I think that they just haven't seen the mistake, and that by fixing it the work is improved.
In the BBQ analogy, this would be something like 'I think the potatoes would be less dry if you wrapped them in foil before grilling them'
Sometimes these can get annoying - you KNOW potatoes are better that way, but you forgot the foil, and they're still edible - but they're still well-meaning.

2) Ad Hominem: Sometimes, I just don't like someone, and I tell them so. The work barely comes into play, other than when I'm complaining about them pulling their real-world belief (political, religious, whatever) into their art (yes, they have the right to put whatever message into their art they want. But I have the right to fight that message if it goes against my own. From there we get into politics)
In the BBQ analogy, this might be anything from 'Dude, we're trying to enjoy the scenery, but you're being disruptive with the choking smoke and the loud party-music' to 'You really should provide more vegetarian options, free cookouts isn't the place for fighting against vegans' and even just plain complaining about the chef being a complete ass ('You struck my son!', 'You had no right to call my wife a whore!', etcetera)
If I bring their art into these complaints, it's usually to contrast their good art with their bad behavior.

>>34650
>BBQ, 'You struck my son!', 'You had no right to call my wife a whore!'
Shit, now I have a fetish about a guy who is making a barbeque while fucking his neighbour's son and wife (and calls her a whore), while his neighbour is complaining about a BBQ. And that guy can do it because HE'S A FUCKING T-REX!

Whether the work is free or not is completely irrelevant. Any art... actually, anything, free or not, should be open for criticism. And if the author can't handle it, it's their own weakness.

>>34647

tl;dr Only the highlighted words.

This is the porn site, half the time I don't know if I shouldn't be paying someone for watching this stuff.

Look I don't demand anything from the author. I don't write offensive emails to him or threaten to murder his hamster if I don't see some in 'n' out. I'm just saying that I think his making a mistake by cock-teasing and that some people care for irrelevant details like this too much. So he shouldn't be surprised if he gets such emails.

>>34655

*a porn site

sorry my mistake

IF I WON'T GET TO SEE THE REST OF THIS COMIC I SWEAR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU ALL!
HOLY SHIT I'M SO ANGRY BECAUSE OF SOME STUPID FAGHEADS I CAN'T SEE THIS PANDA FUCKING THIS TIGER
MY LIFE IS INCOMPLETE NOW IT'S MY GOAL TO SEE SOME CARTOON ANIMALS HAVING SEX
GIVE ME E-MAIL OF THE AUTHOR I'LL SEND HIM OVER 9000 HATE MESSAGES WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE
THIS IS SRS BZNS I'M NOT JOKING!!1

>>34658
Don't think I laughed so hard until I read your butthurt rant. lolololololol

>>34658
fact:
it's actually guys EXACTLY like you that caused the end of this comic.

fact:
the author NEVER mentioned any penetration would occur during the course of the story.

sidenote: your timing is awful.

>>34675
fact: that's a troll, you fool

sidenote: I can tell from some of the caps and from seeing quite a few trolls in my time

>>34676
Doesn't make it any less humorous, whether we know it to be a troll or not.

>>34676

fact: I envy the person who can be trolled by this. I truly do. I mean, I'd like to be easily entertained by gluing a staple to my forehead and wondering where has it gone for the rest of the day. So, nice job Gozila, I think.

sidenote: Sadly I do believe some of the fappers here think along that track. Different words maybe, but the clue remains.

>>34681

fact: I'm the guy who made Godzilla post

fact: after reading the arguing about the comic not being available for the public domain, I decided to make an impression of overly-
butthurt fan stereotype, because I wanted to nail what I think about someone who argued here

sidenote: I do not regret anything

>>34683
well, excuse me... i can't 'read' sarcasm.

>>34683
>>34676

Knock, knock, it's an update from the artist himself...

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5197242/

Could you please put some new pictures to this story it's to good to die

>>35001

Too late. It's gone. The artist said he's still making it, but no more public release. Not worth the hassle of dealing with the haters.

>>35003
>deal with the haters
>implying the author has to do shit about someone disliking their work

pls

>>35008
directly from the artist's journal:
>However, I continue drawing the story.
>And all new pages done so far in 2013 will be on the next Fureal-Compilation (Number 6), released at the beginning of next year.

source: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5197242/

I have all new pages on russian.

>>35012

I'll believe it when I see it.

Last one

What I find the most hilarious about the writer actually stopping this comics is...no one seems to realize that it's just more of the same, more "cock-blocking", only directed towards those who seem to enjoy being "cock-blocked". And is attempting to redirect any ill-feelings because of it towards so-called "haters" or "trolls" while putting on a show of "pity me, I'm so abused".

The entire comic appears to be little more than run-on cock-blocks after an initial set-up to get the readers "expecting" sex to happen...then blocking EVERY time it is expected to occur. The author going withdrawing because some people are complaining is just more of the same.

>>35016
thanks, but isn't there a giant gap between the last english page and your russian page?

Thanks but can post more and have it in English please

Nice find, thanks for sharing.

Of course page 171 is missing.. dumb Russians can't count.