Sorry, forgot to mention, it's on his FA: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7509187/

I think five is for uncompressed super-high quality image.
Donate him dollar and you'll get normal version.

Are you really that greedy for I dollar for awesome artist?
I remember Skidd's Kilika pack for 3$, don't remember it ever fully posted.

Quite the greedy little bastard aren't you? If you can't even afford $1 (He even said 50 cents) then you need to sell your fucking PC because you're clearly a jobless bum living on the streets. :P

Someone uploaded it to e621.net... well that was quick.
>>23449
Condemn pirates all you want but copying small files just got way too easy in the last decade. Pay per file just doesn't work anymore if you can just get anything for free this easily. I'd pay for a real piece of hand-painted art, because it takes some effort to copy it in real-life. But paying for digital copies that take no effort at all to multiply... no thanks. Not anymore.

>>23449
Oh and i bet you're fapping to this picture too right now without paying for it. Why else would you be here, fucking hypocrite.

>>23453
You realise that that is only the smaller version that FK posted on her FA page, right?

"and people who do donate, say 5 bucks or more, I will email the full uncompressed size (double what would be posted)"

>people who donate
>double what would be posted
>double

Yeah. Pirating REALLY pays off.

>>23455

Why would I need a massive hi-res version of some generic softcore furry porn

>>23453
Thanks, but it got uploaded to his page anyway;
I misunderstood, assuming that it wouldn't ever be actually uploaded when in reality he was still planning on uploading it, just that he was trying out the 'donation image' idea. That's why I asked for it here, because I really wanted to see it and assumed that it wouldn't be uploaded to FA ever by him.
For the record, I like FK. I was one click away from donating $5 for this last night. But I think he needs more of an incentive for people to buy this stuff if it's gonna work as a profitable strategy; I can wait a day if it means seeing the full thing for free. I'd be much more tempted if say, this was part of a folio or something, to fork out a bit more.

>>23455
That's the dumbest logic I've ever heard, who gives a fuck about super hi rez fur porn? If you're going to stand up against pirates here I suggest you GTFO.

>>23454

Actually I donated for it so I'm sat here enjoying my poster sized image.

Enjoy your meager, pennyless life poor person.

>>23470
My cock is pretty satisfied with the normal rez version. And i don't plan to plaster my room with big-ass yiff wallpapers for everyone to see. Because i really don't know why else you would need this image super-sized.

People would pay 50 cents for this? Madness.

Well 5 $ for a non exclusive pic is a lot. You rarely pay that even for printed artbooks, if you think of it.

5$ for a art e-book, that a totally another thing. Books i pay have, for me, far more value than others.

>>23449
you expect them to spend there entire allowance on Arts??

Wow I can't believe this debate is still going.
The pic's out there. I'm satisfied. Move on.

were not, and it's not here, post or shut the fuck up. <3

>>23471

The problem is all the pixel-bators out there. People who somehow believe their eye is different from all the other human eyes out there and can somehow see definition beyond 300 ppi.

Personally, I think any image that fits close to my screen resolution at a 1:1 scale is just fine. I just can't see myself needing tits at 6000 x 2000.

Pic related. Porn then versus porn now.

hi res means extra detail
which is nice

You can make a poster out of it. All you need is to come to another town and print it.