|
>>
|
No. 22315
ID: 9b3018
O.K. Paws, I have a few questions (I don't want to come across as trolling).
1. Why the hell fuck are all photomanip (or at least decent ones) tiny, low res, artifact-covered Jpegs? Most images in this thread are about 45kB 600x300. Glorified thumbnails, in other words. Surely if you're going to make something that is supposed to be more art than pron you'd make it a massive HD PNG.
2. Don't any of these women shave? All of them have a massive bush that you'd probably get lost in.
3. Despite the massive audiance and demand for such a thing, most photomanip stuff seems to be more "pretentious, artistic nudity" than porn. Whats up?
4. Apparently for photomanip artists, breasts are AWESOME (so awesome they seem to stick two hundred of the things on sometimes), pubic hair is fucking FANTASTIC, but vaginas must be hidden at all times. What.
5. Furries musn't make these. I say this because furries don't tend to draw/create frogs, pigs, insects and other gross shit that much. What sort of artist usually does this stuff then?
Answers would be much appreciated.
|
