>>
|
No. 24489
ID: ebada6
>>24479
>>24488
Hmmmm, my two cents. Considering the examples I think there is a perception difference here.
>>19970 Is a static pose, so enabling Depth of Field, and everything else, then making a distance shot (to avoid seeing close in jaggies) you could achieve this 'model pose'. Though to put all that on your running (even on a empty sim) only 3 MAYBE 5 FPS, but a static shot doesn't matter.
>>24431 Is a action scene shot (i.e. movement constantly) where the person took a larger shot then crop it down. While the shot is probably still at High level with 10+fps, crop-zoom the image and the jaggies are noticeable on the tats (which I am thinking why your calling it crap?).
I noticed even when I maxed out my settings and accept the low FPS for the shot, if I go for a wide-shot then later 'crop that shit out' as someone bellyached before, I could see the jaggies become noticeable because I zoomed-cropped the image.
My settings were the same during >>24316, >>24317, and added DoF for >>24318 . Yes I took alot of shots, over HOURS of just hanging out because I could, so what? I don't know what your expecting here considering the population of SL is in the millions, so there is a large variety of the females, way they are made, etc. especially unique setups like >>24318 though on the generic base model.
|