{ "submission_id": "3707758", "keywords": [ { "keyword_id": "31427", "keyword_name": "biology", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "83" }, { "keyword_id": "123", "keyword_name": "female", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "1117710" }, { "keyword_id": "12223", "keyword_name": "health", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "103" }, { "keyword_id": "1440", "keyword_name": "human", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "110983" }, { "keyword_id": "59049", "keyword_name": "reproduction", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "47" }, { "keyword_id": "76", "keyword_name": "sex", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "137276" } ], "hidden": "f", "scraps": "f", "favorite": "f", "favorites_count": "0", "create_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:24:29.017177+00", "create_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:24 CEST", "last_file_update_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:21:09.997835+00", "last_file_update_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:21 CEST", "username": "dfeyder", "user_id": "200255", "user_icon_file_name": "278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "user_icon_url_large": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/usericons/large/278/278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "user_icon_url_medium": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/usericons/medium/278/278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "user_icon_url_small": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/usericons/small/278/278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "file_name": "5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format_noncustom.jpg", "thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format_noncustom.jpg", "thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "76", "thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "thumb_large_noncustom_x": "126", "thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "189", "thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300", "files": [ { "file_id": "5719080", "file_name": "5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "mimetype": "image/jpeg", "submission_id": "3707758", "user_id": "200255", "submission_file_order": "0", "full_size_x": "800", "full_size_y": "1269", "screen_size_x": "800", "screen_size_y": "1269", "preview_size_x": "189", "preview_size_y": "300", "initial_file_md5": "a03651b1307041c02cd6c46a42a42486", "full_file_md5": "a03651b1307041c02cd6c46a42a42486", "large_file_md5": "25ed61ccdd220e8792759ea5b46888f6", "small_file_md5": "137ff70c9cc80310e7b13b49539c88d6", "thumbnail_md5": "6f125de5f5d6f636a934b80124617803", "deleted": "f", "create_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:21:09.997835+00", "create_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:21 CEST", "thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format.jpg", "thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format_noncustom.jpg", "thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719080_dfeyder_9118-female-reproductive-system_format_noncustom.jpg", "thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "76", "thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "thumb_large_noncustom_x": "126", "thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "189", "thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300" } ], "pools": [], "description": "A Brief Exploration of the Reproductive Habits and Unique Evolutionary Adaptations of the Races in the Cherrywood Community \n\nWritten by:\n Ben Lagoshi \nLeo Fourthmen \nYuki Bal’vic\n\nWith contributions from experts:\nDr. Silas Thrane – Sociologist, Cherrywood Journal of Sociological Growth and Development\nDr. Linnis Ortega – Evolutionary Biologist, AUCR Institute for Evolutionary Science\n\nPremise\nThis academic investigation aims to provide a clinical, structured analysis of the reproductive adaptations of the alien races living within our community. By detailing key biological, evolutionary, and sociological mechanisms, this study serves as an introduction to further research, rather than an exhaustive analysis.\n\nAll data has been sourced from established scientific and medical institutions, and participant names have been anonymized for ethical considerations.\n\nMethodology\nAccording to the Women's Center for Population Health and Growth, there are 152 unique alien species residing in the Cherrywood community. Each evolved independently and developed novel reproductive adaptations, making comparative analysis complex.\n\nTo ensure practical scope and clear biological parallels, we followed a structured selection process: \nExcluded species that do not reproduce sexually, defining sexual reproduction as requiring an exchange of genetic material between two or more partners. Removed species whose adaptations lacked clear comparative biological structures to terrestrial organisms. \nExcluded species without sexual dimorphism (distinct male and female variations). \nRandomized selection among the remaining species via blind drawing method, ensuring an unbiased approach to study order.\n\nControl Group & Study Structure:\nTo facilitate comparative analysis, humans were chosen as the control species due to their well-documented reproductive biology and extensive evolutionary data.\n\nWhile humans were not directly studied, their reproductive framework was used to standardize documentation for clarity across species comparisons.\n\nThe following template was established to ensure uniformity in analysis:\n\nRace: Human (Template)\n\n\nDescription: the common human has two arms, two legs, hands and feet with appendages attached, one head. Largely ape-like in appearance with reduced fur growth. Sexually dimorphic with male and female having unique biology, chemistry and physiology.\nAge of Reproductive Onset: 9-14 years expected (this number is meant to describe when the species first starts to show signs of desire or ability to mate.)\nPeak Reproductive Years: 15-35 years expected (this number is meant to represent the age range wherein the species is most likely to attempt mating)\nGestation: 240 days (after successful mating occurs number of days before a litter is born)\nPostpartum Recovery Period: 28 days ( after gestation number of days before another mating may be attempted)\n\nEvent/Encounter Duration: 15-20 Minutes (this number represents the most common length of time a mating attempt takes. This includes only the time that physical contact is being made)\nGamete Interaction: 6-10 minutes (This represents the anticipated elapsed time between the initiation of mating and the window in which fertilization can occur.)\nSuccess Rate Per Encounter: 20%-30% (this is the likelihood that a single unplanned mating could result in a litter. Assuming no attempt was made to reduce or encourage probabilities. This also assumes a natural mating without external factors taking place and that mating takes place within the fertility window.)\nSuccess Rate Per Event: 60%-70% (this number represents the chance of a successful mating if measure had been used to improve odds: such as actively tracking heat or engaging 8 or more encounters in a single heat cycle.)\nLitter: 1-2 (this is the expected number of offspring produced after a successful mating.)\novulatory cycles: 11-13 (this represents the number of ovulatory cycles a human experiences per year assuming good health.)\n\n\nEvolutionary pressures: Internal gestation reduces early development mortality, promoting protective social structures that safeguard offspring through pre-maturity. (if any of our experts hypothesis as to why a unique trait evolved we will put it here)\nUnique Male Adaptations: (here we will describe anything about the male of the species that is noteworthy–assuming that humans have the most common shape.)\n\nUnique Female Adaptations: (here we will describe anything about the females of the species that is noteworthy–with the assumption that the human shape is the most common.)\n\nOther Notes: (if any other insight was made available in the mist of our investigation it will be noted here.)\nJargon\nIt is important to establish that neither I nor my team are medical professionals. I (Ben Lagoshi) am a journalist, Leo is my editor, Yuki is a statistician, Bean is our project supervisor and Skyler is a research assistant. While compiling data for this study, we selected three primary sources: \nOFWH Journal of Reproductive Health \nAUCR Institute Journal of Evolutionary Science \nCherrywood Journal of Sociological Growth and Development\nThese are technical publications, written for experts in specialized fields. \"This came as an unexpected realization,\" Yuki remarked as we exchanged notes.\nDue to the complexity of the subject matter, we consulted Dr. Lani Ortega, a specialist in behavioral science and reproductive health at the AUCR Institute. Her guidance proved invaluable in translating highly technical concepts into accessible explanations.\nBelow is a list of medical and technical terms that required clarification, including journal definitions and Dr. Ortega’s explanations.\nLCL: Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus Enzyme\nJournal Definition – OFWH Journal of Reproductive Health \"Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) is an enzyme produced by the body of a Haru that facilitates metabolization of DNA and RNA, influencing imprintation status.\"\nDr. Ortega’s Explanation: \"LCL is an enzyme unique to Haru biology—a biological processor for genetic material. It collects DNA and RNA samples during mating, then restructures sex cells to match a preferred mate. Unlike artificial genetic engineering, LCL works instinctively within the Haru’s body, meaning it does not manually alter genes—it absorbs them, metabolizes them, and integrates them into the reproductive system. It ensures offspring express genetic traits primarily from the selected mate. If LCL fails to absorb enough partner DNA, it defaults to the Haru’s own genetic code, leading to offspring genetically identical to the Haru parent, without external genetic variation.\"\nPGC/FGC/DGC – Classification of Mating Encounters\nWhy These Terms Are Necessary The term \"mating\" is not simply a verb—it encompasses a complex web of physiological, neurological, sociological, and behavioral events. \nEncounters can be incidental, structured, or ritualized, affecting hormonal responses, social hierarchies, legal frameworks, and evolutionary adaptations. \nPGC, FGC, and DGC are cladistic classifications, sorting mating interactions based on physical engagement thresholds, ensuring clarity within scientific studies.\nJournal Definitions:\nPGC (Primary Genital Contact) : Incidental, partial, or accidental contact with reproductive organs or fluids.\nMinimal pregnancy risk but qualifies as a mating encounter under biological classification.\nTypical duration: Less than 1 minute of sustained contact, direct or indirect.\nFGC (Full Genital Contact) : Engagement enacted but not with explicit intention of reproduction.\nMay serve social or bonding purposes or result from mistaken sustained contact.\nDuration: Typically 1-8 minutes of genital contact for at least one participant.\nPossible continuation up to 15 minutes with a single individual or 60 minutes divided among multiple participants.\nDGC (Direct Genital Contact) – Structured mating event, explicitly acknowledging potential pregnancy outcomes.\nParticipants engage with the understanding that reproduction may occur, reinforcing biological readiness.\nMay involve mating rituals, behavioral pacing, or arousal threshold mechanics.\nPGC, FGC, and DGC classifications offer a methodical framework for sorting mating encounters, but their functional role differs between species. Some organisms exhibit heightened biological responses even in brief incidental contact, while others regulate mating encounters through structured rituals or seasonal hormonal shifts. For instance, in species where PGC triggers ovulatory activation, an encounter lasting mere seconds could have lasting reproductive implications, while FGC in communal species might reinforce social bonding rather than direct fertility interactions. This layered complexity challenges initial assumptions about mating behaviors, requiring further studies to determine how classification influences evolutionary adaptation.\n\n\nInterview Transcript: Ben & Dr. Ortega – Classification of Mating Encounters\nBen Lagoshi: \"So, Dr. Ortega, I want to make sure I fully understand these classifications. The journals state that PGC, FGC, and DGC help sort mating-related actions, but the scope appears far-reaching.\"\nDr. Ortega: \"That’s a fair observation. The biggest misconception is that mating is only about reproduction—which isn’t the case at all. These classifications exist because mating encounters encompass far more than just conception attempts. Hormonal responses, neurological activation, social bonding, and even non-reproductive interactions can be categorized within this framework.\"\nBen: \"Okay, so PGC is the lowest level—does this mean accidental contact can trigger a mating response?\"\nDr. Ortega: \"Yes, in a very technical sense. PGC describes incidental exposure involving reproductive organs or fluids, yet lacks sustained engagement. Think of it as biological proximity triggering a hormonal reaction rather than an actual mating attempt.\"\nBen: \"Then FGC steps it up—so this is an actual interaction, but not necessarily for reproduction?\"\nDr. Ortega: \"Correct. FGC occurs when genital contact is maintained, but it doesn’t have to be intentional for conception. It might be for bonding, ritual, or social reinforcement, but biological readiness is still triggered.\"\nBen: \"And then DGC is the full-scale event—when participants deliberately prime themselves for potential pregnancy?\"\nDr. Ortega: \"Exactly. DGC represents structured engagement, where all participants have been psychologically and emotionally primed for mating as a reproductive act rather than just an encounter. In species with complex social mating systems, this step ensures fertilization becomes an expected outcome rather than an incidental one.\"\nBen: \"So if I understand this right—PGC signifies biological proximity rather than direct engagement, FGC is sustained interaction but not necessarily reproductive, and DGC is the full commitment where pregnancy is an expected possibility?\"\nDr. Ortega: \"That’s precisely the idea. And since every species processes mating cues differently, these classifications help researchers standardize engagement thresholds to differentiate between incidental contact and reproductive intent.\"\n\n\nAnecdote – Incidental Pregnancy in Haru Biology\nIn an unrelated discussion later that day, I proposed another question within the same topic—one that was officially off the record. \"What is the likelihood of pregnancy resulting from incidental genetic material exposure?\"\nDr. Ortega immediately responded, \"0.05% under any normal conditions.\"\nI sensed she was waiting for me to ask, \"What conditions?\"\nShe explained, \"Given the novel method of genetic absorption through the epidermal layer in Haru… if internal and external temperatures synchronize at 99.1°F, and two tablespoons of freshly harvested sperm cells are spread across a non-absorbent, wax-sealed surface, then make direct contact with a Haru’s perineum—perhaps through a gap in a pair of bikini bottoms… In this scenario, epidermal absorption over 45 seconds reaches the threshold needed to allow fertilization, making pregnancy plausible.\"\nDr. Ortega then told me a story about a Haru engineer she once worked with. She mentioned that some of her coworkers ran this exact scenario through a hypothetical modeling program. After 1,000 test iterations, rerunning the numbers, 3.9% of the time, this method successfully led to pregnancy—3.98% if the DNA sample was applied directly to the perineum without interference from fabric.\nI sat in silence for a moment, staring blankly ahead. Then, Ortega raised her hand, signaling me to wait, before softly whispering, \"I assume she knew this was possible because she witnessed it firsthand.\"\nRecently, she bumped into her former coworker again. The engineer is now a mother of five.\nArousal Level Threshold: (ALT)\nNote: The following chart is used by Fertility experts to explain levels of arousal. This chat has also been used by Mouwzi Mystics to organize a series of games referred to as “Edging” there are many possible setups for this ‘game’ some requiring dice or other RNG programs–but at its most simple it is as follows: a multiple of two fertile individuals will begin a “Mating Encounter” and they will challenge each other to spot one of these diagnostic traits mid mating then disengage. It is proposed that a game of this nature teaches self control and can be used as birth control when other forms are not available. I will also share with you an interview where in this is explained. I also have a sceptic that will point out the flaws in this methodology. \nThe Arousal Level Threshold refers to a graded scale of physiological responses that can be detected visually or through tactile feedback during mating interactions. These responses indicate progressive levels of engagement, ranging from subtle pre-arousal cues to intense, involuntary reactions signaling peak readiness.\n\n\nTwelve Levels of Arousal Level Threshold (ALT) with Sex-Specific Responses Pre-Contact – Latent Activation Phase (NEW) Universal Markers: \n\n\nBaseline: hormonal shifts preceding engagement, minor alterations in pupil dilation, early pheromone production onset. \nMale-Specific: Increase in testosterone secretion, slight thickening of vascular walls, early activation of sperm transport mechanisms. \nFemale-Specific: Increase in estrogen diffusion, subtle expansion of vascularized tissues in reproductive regions, early lubrication activation. \nFirst Contact – Early Sensory Activation Universal Markers:\nSlight increase in heart rate, deep breathing, minor vascular dilation in extremities. \nMale-Specific: Heightened dopaminergic response, minor testicular contractility, early blood flow redirection to reproductive structures. \nFemale-Specific: Peripheral vascular dilation, receptor priming in cervical regions, minor pelvic floor tension adjustments.\nScant Contact – Pre-Mating Preparation Universal Markers: \nSwelling around reproductive zones due to increased blood flow, minor heat buildup in exposed skin surfaces. \nMale-Specific: Strengthened vascular tension increasing firmness, activation of fluid pre-ejection mechanics. \nFemale-Specific: Early uterine positional shifts, responsive lubrication intensification, increase in sensory nerve excitability. \nMinimum Mating – Neuromuscular Priming Universal Markers:\nMinor muscle contractions, initial release of reproductive fluids, heightened tactile sensitivity in erogenous zones. \nMale-Specific: Initiation of reproductive fluid pressurization, early-stage sperm mobilization, minor prostate engagement. \nFemale-Specific: Cervical sensitivity activation, involuntary clitoral pulse reinforcement, initial contraction rhythms in reproductive musculature. \nBrief Contact – Early Tactile Reinforcement Universal Markers: \nLocalized surface tremors, temperature increase near vascularized regions, transient spasms in facial muscles (eyes, lips, nasal region). \nMale-Specific: Increasing fluid viscosity, early urethral dilation signaling system readiness, minor pelvic structural shifts. \nFemale-Specific: Heightened cervical engagement, stabilization of uterine positioning, temperature increase in reproductive tract tissues. \nShort Contact – Consistent Reflex Activation Universal Markers: \nMuscle contractions begin affecting full-body coordination, spontaneous vasodilation triggers visible coloration shifts, peripheral nervous system engagement heightens sensitivity. \nMale-Specific: Heightened fluid pressurization, momentary reproductive tension calibration, neurological synchronization reinforcing motor control. \nFemale-Specific: Steady-cycle muscular activation, clitoral sensitivity spikes, pelvic floor rhythmic structuring preparing for engagement duration stability. \nMid Contact – Stable Engagement Phase Universal Markers: \nPronounced pulsing in exposed musculature, delayed voluntary motion due to sensory feedback reinforcement, steady fluid exchange activation. \nMale-Specific: Reinforced ejaculatory retention, shortened refractory latency, extended vascular dilation preserving engagement integrity. \nFemale-Specific: Prolonged cervical fluid retention, contractile intensification regulating reproductive fluid exposure, early propellant gland stabilization (species-dependent). \nHigh Contact –Peak Neuromuscular Response Universal Markers:\nSharp, involuntary contractions in fingers, toes, anal muscles, uncontrollable skin twitching, maximized hormonal signal transmission reinforcing fluid release timing. \nMale-Specific: Primary ejaculatory engagement, neurological sensitivity spike, momentary endocrine system recalibration influencing metabolic acceleration.\nFemale-Specific: Heightened endometrial receptivity, secondary reproductive fluid modulation, major muscular synchronization event reinforcing engagement stability. \nImminent Mating – Final Activation Before Full Exposure Universal Markers:\nMajor release of reproductive fluids, severe muscle contractions across reproductive and core regions, shortness of breath, sporadic postural instability due to sensory overload. \nMale-Specific: Completion of fluid exchange, arterial contraction signaling phase closure, gradual endocrine system stabilization. \nFemale-Specific: Last-stage contraction cycles, final phase cervical reception, biochemical reinforcement of conception thresholds. \nFull Exposure : Completion of Mating Event Universal Markers: \nRapid post-mating biochemical stabilization, vascular dilation subsides, residual neuromuscular activation gradually fades, return to baseline reproductive cycle parameters. \nMale-Specific: Gradual testosterone rebalancing, post-engagement vascular normalization, minor neurological cooldown response. \nFemale-Specific: Residual contraction minimization, uterine integration of reproductive fluids, post-engagement hormonal balancing cycle initiates. \nPost-Contact : Extended Refractory Phase (NEW) Universal Markers: \nGradual return to homeostatic baseline, reduced sensory responsiveness, lingering hormonal diffusion stabilizing reproductive cycle rhythms. \nMale-Specific: Extended refractory period onset, dopamine regulation aligning neural sensitivity, temporary engagement aversion restoring metabolic balance.\nFemale-Specific: Temporary sensory expansion before cooldown, biochemical synchronization reinforcing post-engagement retention, last-stage vascular cycle normalization.\n\nOvulation & Fertility Symptoms in Females\nCervical Fluid Changes\nColor/Texture Shift: Moves from thicker, cloudy mucus to clear, stretchy consistency, optimizing sperm transport.\nDetectability: Becomes visually and texturally noticeable within Scant Contact : Pre-Mating Preparation phase.\nSkin Texture & Pigmentation Changes\nSoftening or Increased Elasticity: Slight skin hydration boost, mild swelling in reproductive tissue due to estrogen spikes.\nPigmentation Shift: Some species may exhibit darker or flushed hues in specific areas (face, genitals).\nDetectability: Becomes noticeable near Minimum Mating : Neuromuscular Priming phase, when vascular responses heighten.\nGenital Softening or Swelling\nLocalized expansion: Vaginal, cervical, and labial swelling occurs due to increased blood flow and tissue elasticity.\nDetectability: Most prominent in Brief Contact – Early Tactile Reinforcement, aligning with early neuromuscular engagement.\nHeightened Sensitivity & Arousal Response\nIncreased tactile responsiveness: Enhanced clitoral blood flow, sharper nerve signal transmission in erogenous zones.\nDetectability: Aligns with Short Contact– Consistent Reflex Activation, where sensory feedback loops engage fully.\nAbnormal Reactions During Intercourse\nInvoluntary muscle contractions: Pelvic region spasms may intensify during peak fertility, potential discomfort or heightened pleasure.\nDetectability: Becomes highly pronounced near Mid Contact – Stable Engagement Phase, correlating with fluid exchange mechanics.\n Pheromone Amplification\nHeightened biochemical signaling: Increased sexual attraction cues, subtle scent differentiation based on peak receptivity.\nDetectability: Peaks during High Contact – Peak Neuromuscular Response, reinforcing fertility synchronization within engagement.\nEndometrial Receptivity Surge\nUterine lining optimization: Final biochemical restructuring of reproductive tract maximizing implantation probability.\nDetectability: Becomes biologically active in Imminent Mating : Final Activation Before Full Exposure, the point where conception probability is highest.\n\n\n\n\nExperts Explain Mouwzi Edging Game\nExpert in Favor: Dr. Elaan Voska (Mouwzi Fertility & Behavioral Sciences) _\"The Mouwzi practice of Edging is a deeply ingrained technique that fosters exceptional reproductive awareness and self-control. By training individuals to recognize physiological shifts mid-encounter, they develop an acute sensitivity to their own arousal levels, improving their ability to regulate engagement and prevent unintended conception.\nHistorical analysis indicates that among high-discipline practitioners, Edging success rates rival conventional birth control methods in environments where external contraceptive options are unreliable.\"\nSkeptic: Dr. Anzir Daroc (AUCR Institute, Biochemical Reproductive Studies) _\"While the premise of Edging is intriguing, it suffers from critical flaws. Physiological responses in arousal are often unpredictable, varying due to environmental stressors, hormone fluctuations, or even simple miscalculations in timing.\nUnlike mechanical contraception, which provides definitive barriers, Edging relies entirely on reaction speed and decision-making under heightened sensory conditions—both highly unreliable factors. The margin of error is significant enough that it cannot be considered a dependable birth control method in practical applications.\"\nArousal Threshold\nExpected Time Elapsed\nLikelihood of Sperm Introduction (0-5 Scale)\nLikelihood Pregnancy Has\n Occurred (0-5 Scale)\nFirst Contact\n0-1 min\n0 (No sperm introduced)\n0 (Pregnancy impossible)\nScant Contact\n1-3 min\n1 (Earliest sperm introduction: 2m 15s)\n0 \nMinimum Mating\n3-5 min\n2 \n0 \nBrief Contact\n5-7 min\n5 (Guaranteed sperm introduction: 6m 10s)\n1 (First possible pregnancy: 6m 40s)\nShort Contact\n7-10 min\n5\n2 \nMid Contact\n10-14 min\n5 \n3\nHigh Contact\n14-18 min\n5 \n4 \nImminent Mating\n18-22 min\n5 \n5 (Pregnancy guaranteed by 20m 50s)\nFull Exposure\n22+ min\n5 \n5 \n\n", "description_bbcode_parsed": "A Brief Exploration of the Reproductive Habits and Unique Evolutionary Adaptations of the Races in the Cherrywood Community

Written by:
 Ben Lagoshi
Leo Fourthmen
Yuki Bal’vic

With contributions from experts:
Dr. Silas Thrane – Sociologist, Cherrywood Journal of Sociological Growth and Development
Dr. Linnis Ortega – Evolutionary Biologist, AUCR Institute for Evolutionary Science

Premise
This academic investigation aims to provide a clinical, structured analysis of the reproductive adaptations of the alien races living within our community. By detailing key biological, evolutionary, and sociological mechanisms, this study serves as an introduction to further research, rather than an exhaustive analysis.

All data has been sourced from established scientific and medical institutions, and participant names have been anonymized for ethical considerations.

Methodology
According to the Women's Center for Population Health and Growth, there are 152 unique alien species residing in the Cherrywood community. Each evolved independently and developed novel reproductive adaptations, making comparative analysis complex.

To ensure practical scope and clear biological parallels, we followed a structured selection process:
Excluded species that do not reproduce sexually, defining sexual reproduction as requiring an exchange of genetic material between two or more partners. Removed species whose adaptations lacked clear comparative biological structures to terrestrial organisms.
Excluded species without sexual dimorphism (distinct male and female variations).
Randomized selection among the remaining species via blind drawing method, ensuring an unbiased approach to study order.

Control Group & Study Structure:
To facilitate comparative analysis, humans were chosen as the control species due to their well-documented reproductive biology and extensive evolutionary data.

While humans were not directly studied, their reproductive framework was used to standardize documentation for clarity across species comparisons.

The following template was established to ensure uniformity in analysis:

Race: Human (Template)


Description: the common human has two arms, two legs, hands and feet with appendages attached, one head. Largely ape-like in appearance with reduced fur growth.  Sexually dimorphic with male and female having unique biology, chemistry and physiology.
Age of Reproductive Onset: 9-14 years expected (this number is meant to describe when the species first starts to show signs of desire or ability to mate.)
Peak Reproductive Years: 15-35 years expected (this number is meant to represent the age range wherein the species is most likely to attempt mating)
Gestation: 240 days (after successful mating occurs number of days before a litter is born)
Postpartum Recovery Period: 28 days ( after gestation number of days before another mating may be attempted)

Event/Encounter Duration: 15-20 Minutes (this number represents the most common length of time a mating attempt takes. This includes only the time that physical contact is being made)
Gamete Interaction: 6-10 minutes  (This represents the anticipated elapsed time between the initiation of mating and the window in which fertilization can occur.)
Success Rate Per Encounter: 20%-30% (this is the likelihood that a single unplanned mating could result in a litter. Assuming no attempt was made to reduce or encourage probabilities. This also assumes a natural mating without external factors taking place and that mating takes place within the fertility window.)
Success Rate Per Event: 60%-70% (this number represents the chance of a successful mating if measure had been used to improve odds: such as actively tracking heat or engaging 8 or more  encounters in a single heat cycle.)
Litter: 1-2 (this is the expected number of offspring produced after a successful mating.)
ovulatory cycles: 11-13 (this represents the number of ovulatory cycles a human experiences per year assuming good health.)


Evolutionary pressures: Internal gestation reduces early development mortality, promoting protective social structures that safeguard offspring through pre-maturity. (if any of our experts hypothesis as to why a unique trait evolved we will put it here)
Unique Male Adaptations: (here we will describe anything about the male of the species that is noteworthy–assuming that humans have the most common shape.)

Unique Female Adaptations: (here we will describe anything about the females of the species that is noteworthy–with the assumption that the human shape is the most common.)

Other Notes: (if any other insight was made available in the mist of our investigation it will be noted here.)
Jargon
It is important to establish that neither I nor my team are medical professionals. I (Ben Lagoshi) am a journalist, Leo is my editor, Yuki is a statistician, Bean is our project supervisor and Skyler is a research assistant. While compiling data for this study, we selected three primary sources:
OFWH Journal of Reproductive Health
AUCR Institute Journal of Evolutionary Science
Cherrywood Journal of Sociological Growth and Development
These are technical publications, written for experts in specialized fields. "This came as an unexpected realization," Yuki remarked as we exchanged notes.
Due to the complexity of the subject matter, we consulted Dr. Lani Ortega, a specialist in behavioral science and reproductive health at the AUCR Institute. Her guidance proved invaluable in translating highly technical concepts into accessible explanations.
Below is a list of medical and technical terms that required clarification, including journal definitions and Dr. Ortega’s explanations.
LCL: Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus Enzyme
Journal Definition – OFWH Journal of Reproductive Health "Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) is an enzyme produced by the body of a Haru that facilitates metabolization of DNA and RNA, influencing imprintation status."
Dr. Ortega’s Explanation: "LCL is an enzyme unique to Haru biology—a biological processor for genetic material. It collects DNA and RNA samples during mating, then restructures sex cells to match a preferred mate. Unlike artificial genetic engineering, LCL works instinctively within the Haru’s body, meaning it does not manually alter genes—it absorbs them, metabolizes them, and integrates them into the reproductive system. It ensures offspring express genetic traits primarily from the selected mate. If LCL fails to absorb enough partner DNA, it defaults to the Haru’s own genetic code, leading to offspring genetically identical to the Haru parent, without external genetic variation."
PGC/FGC/DGC – Classification of Mating Encounters
Why These Terms Are Necessary The term "mating" is not simply a verb—it encompasses a complex web of physiological, neurological, sociological, and behavioral events.
Encounters can be incidental, structured, or ritualized, affecting hormonal responses, social hierarchies, legal frameworks, and evolutionary adaptations.
PGC, FGC, and DGC are cladistic classifications, sorting mating interactions based on physical engagement thresholds, ensuring clarity within scientific studies.
Journal Definitions:
PGC (Primary Genital Contact) : Incidental, partial, or accidental contact with reproductive organs or fluids.
Minimal pregnancy risk but qualifies as a mating encounter under biological classification.
Typical duration: Less than 1 minute of sustained contact, direct or indirect.
FGC (Full Genital Contact) : Engagement enacted but not with explicit intention of reproduction.
May serve social or bonding purposes or result from mistaken sustained contact.
Duration: Typically 1-8 minutes of genital contact for at least one participant.
Possible continuation up to 15 minutes with a single individual or 60 minutes divided among multiple participants.
DGC (Direct Genital Contact) – Structured mating event, explicitly acknowledging potential pregnancy outcomes.
Participants engage with the understanding that reproduction may occur, reinforcing biological readiness.
May involve mating rituals, behavioral pacing, or arousal threshold mechanics.
PGC, FGC, and DGC classifications offer a methodical framework for sorting mating encounters, but their functional role differs between species. Some organisms exhibit heightened biological responses even in brief incidental contact, while others regulate mating encounters through structured rituals or seasonal hormonal shifts. For instance, in species where PGC triggers ovulatory activation, an encounter lasting mere seconds could have lasting reproductive implications, while FGC in communal species might reinforce social bonding rather than direct fertility interactions. This layered complexity challenges initial assumptions about mating behaviors, requiring further studies to determine how classification influences evolutionary adaptation.


Interview Transcript: Ben & Dr. Ortega – Classification of Mating Encounters
Ben Lagoshi: "So, Dr. Ortega, I want to make sure I fully understand these classifications. The journals state that PGC, FGC, and DGC help sort mating-related actions, but the scope appears far-reaching."
Dr. Ortega: "That’s a fair observation. The biggest misconception is that mating is only about reproduction—which isn’t the case at all. These classifications exist because mating encounters encompass far more than just conception attempts. Hormonal responses, neurological activation, social bonding, and even non-reproductive interactions can be categorized within this framework."
Ben: "Okay, so PGC is the lowest level—does this mean accidental contact can trigger a mating response?"
Dr. Ortega: "Yes, in a very technical sense. PGC describes incidental exposure involving reproductive organs or fluids, yet lacks sustained engagement. Think of it as biological proximity triggering a hormonal reaction rather than an actual mating attempt."
Ben: "Then FGC steps it up—so this is an actual interaction, but not necessarily for reproduction?"
Dr. Ortega: "Correct. FGC occurs when genital contact is maintained, but it doesn’t have to be intentional for conception. It might be for bonding, ritual, or social reinforcement, but biological readiness is still triggered."
Ben: "And then DGC is the full-scale event—when participants deliberately prime themselves for potential pregnancy?"
Dr. Ortega: "Exactly. DGC represents structured engagement, where all participants have been psychologically and emotionally primed for mating as a reproductive act rather than just an encounter. In species with complex social mating systems, this step ensures fertilization becomes an expected outcome rather than an incidental one."
Ben: "So if I understand this right—PGC signifies biological proximity rather than direct engagement, FGC is sustained interaction but not necessarily reproductive, and DGC is the full commitment where pregnancy is an expected possibility?"
Dr. Ortega: "That’s precisely the idea. And since every species processes mating cues differently, these classifications help researchers standardize engagement thresholds to differentiate between incidental contact and reproductive intent."


Anecdote – Incidental Pregnancy in Haru Biology
In an unrelated discussion later that day, I proposed another question within the same topic—one that was officially off the record. "What is the likelihood of pregnancy resulting from incidental genetic material exposure?"
Dr. Ortega immediately responded, "0.05% under any normal conditions."
I sensed she was waiting for me to ask, "What conditions?"
She explained, "Given the novel method of genetic absorption through the epidermal layer in Haru… if internal and external temperatures synchronize at 99.1°F, and two tablespoons of freshly harvested sperm cells are spread across a non-absorbent, wax-sealed surface, then make direct contact with a Haru’s perineum—perhaps through a gap in a pair of bikini bottoms… In this scenario, epidermal absorption over 45 seconds reaches the threshold needed to allow fertilization, making pregnancy plausible."
Dr. Ortega then told me a story about a Haru engineer she once worked with. She mentioned that some of her coworkers ran this exact scenario through a hypothetical modeling program. After 1,000 test iterations, rerunning the numbers, 3.9% of the time, this method successfully led to pregnancy—3.98% if the DNA sample was applied directly to the perineum without interference from fabric.
I sat in silence for a moment, staring blankly ahead. Then, Ortega raised her hand, signaling me to wait, before softly whispering, "I assume she knew this was possible because she witnessed it firsthand."
Recently, she bumped into her former coworker again. The engineer is now a mother of five.
Arousal Level Threshold: (ALT)
Note: The following chart is used by Fertility experts to explain levels of arousal. This chat has also been used by Mouwzi Mystics to organize a series of games referred to as “Edging” there are many possible setups for this ‘game’ some requiring dice or other RNG programs–but at its most simple it is as follows: a multiple of two fertile individuals will begin a “Mating Encounter” and they will challenge each other to spot one of these diagnostic traits mid mating then disengage. It is proposed that a game of this nature teaches self control and can be used as birth control when other forms are not available. I will also share with you an interview where in this is explained. I also have a sceptic that will point out the flaws in this methodology.  
The Arousal Level Threshold refers to a graded scale of physiological responses that can be detected visually or through tactile feedback during mating interactions. These responses indicate progressive levels of engagement, ranging from subtle pre-arousal cues to intense, involuntary reactions signaling peak readiness.


Twelve Levels of Arousal Level Threshold (ALT) with Sex-Specific Responses  Pre-Contact – Latent Activation Phase (NEW) Universal Markers:


Baseline: hormonal shifts preceding engagement, minor alterations in pupil dilation, early pheromone production onset.
Male-Specific: Increase in testosterone secretion, slight thickening of vascular walls, early activation of sperm transport mechanisms.
Female-Specific: Increase in estrogen diffusion, subtle expansion of vascularized tissues in reproductive regions, early lubrication activation.  
First Contact – Early Sensory Activation Universal Markers:
Slight increase in heart rate, deep breathing, minor vascular dilation in extremities.
Male-Specific: Heightened dopaminergic response, minor testicular contractility, early blood flow redirection to reproductive structures.
Female-Specific: Peripheral vascular dilation, receptor priming in cervical regions, minor pelvic floor tension adjustments.
Scant Contact – Pre-Mating Preparation Universal Markers:
Swelling around reproductive zones due to increased blood flow, minor heat buildup in exposed skin surfaces.
Male-Specific: Strengthened vascular tension increasing firmness, activation of fluid pre-ejection mechanics.
Female-Specific: Early uterine positional shifts, responsive lubrication intensification, increase in sensory nerve excitability.
Minimum Mating – Neuromuscular Priming Universal Markers:
Minor muscle contractions, initial release of reproductive fluids, heightened tactile sensitivity in erogenous zones.
Male-Specific: Initiation of reproductive fluid pressurization, early-stage sperm mobilization, minor prostate engagement.
Female-Specific: Cervical sensitivity activation, involuntary clitoral pulse reinforcement, initial contraction rhythms in reproductive musculature.
Brief Contact – Early Tactile Reinforcement Universal Markers:
Localized surface tremors, temperature increase near vascularized regions, transient spasms in facial muscles (eyes, lips, nasal region).
Male-Specific: Increasing fluid viscosity, early urethral dilation signaling system readiness, minor pelvic structural shifts.
Female-Specific: Heightened cervical engagement, stabilization of uterine positioning, temperature increase in reproductive tract tissues.
Short Contact – Consistent Reflex Activation Universal Markers:
Muscle contractions begin affecting full-body coordination, spontaneous vasodilation triggers visible coloration shifts, peripheral nervous system engagement heightens sensitivity.
Male-Specific: Heightened fluid pressurization, momentary reproductive tension calibration, neurological synchronization reinforcing motor control.
Female-Specific: Steady-cycle muscular activation, clitoral sensitivity spikes, pelvic floor rhythmic structuring preparing for engagement duration stability.
Mid Contact – Stable Engagement Phase Universal Markers:
Pronounced pulsing in exposed musculature, delayed voluntary motion due to sensory feedback reinforcement, steady fluid exchange activation.
Male-Specific: Reinforced ejaculatory retention, shortened refractory latency, extended vascular dilation preserving engagement integrity.
Female-Specific: Prolonged cervical fluid retention, contractile intensification regulating reproductive fluid exposure, early propellant gland stabilization (species-dependent).
High Contact –Peak Neuromuscular Response Universal Markers:
Sharp, involuntary contractions in fingers, toes, anal muscles, uncontrollable skin twitching, maximized hormonal signal transmission reinforcing fluid release timing.
Male-Specific: Primary ejaculatory engagement, neurological sensitivity spike, momentary endocrine system recalibration influencing metabolic acceleration.
Female-Specific: Heightened endometrial receptivity, secondary reproductive fluid modulation, major muscular synchronization event reinforcing engagement stability.
Imminent Mating – Final Activation Before Full Exposure Universal Markers:
Major release of reproductive fluids, severe muscle contractions across reproductive and core regions, shortness of breath, sporadic postural instability due to sensory overload.
Male-Specific: Completion of fluid exchange, arterial contraction signaling phase closure, gradual endocrine system stabilization.
Female-Specific: Last-stage contraction cycles, final phase cervical reception, biochemical reinforcement of conception thresholds.
Full Exposure : Completion of Mating Event Universal Markers:
Rapid post-mating biochemical stabilization, vascular dilation subsides, residual neuromuscular activation gradually fades, return to baseline reproductive cycle parameters.
Male-Specific: Gradual testosterone rebalancing, post-engagement vascular normalization, minor neurological cooldown response.
Female-Specific: Residual contraction minimization, uterine integration of reproductive fluids, post-engagement hormonal balancing cycle initiates.
Post-Contact : Extended Refractory Phase (NEW) Universal Markers:
Gradual return to homeostatic baseline, reduced sensory responsiveness, lingering hormonal diffusion stabilizing reproductive cycle rhythms.
Male-Specific: Extended refractory period onset, dopamine regulation aligning neural sensitivity, temporary engagement aversion restoring metabolic balance.
Female-Specific: Temporary sensory expansion before cooldown, biochemical synchronization reinforcing post-engagement retention, last-stage vascular cycle normalization.

Ovulation & Fertility Symptoms in Females
Cervical Fluid Changes
Color/Texture Shift: Moves from thicker, cloudy mucus to clear, stretchy consistency, optimizing sperm transport.
Detectability: Becomes visually and texturally noticeable within Scant Contact : Pre-Mating Preparation phase.
Skin Texture & Pigmentation Changes
Softening or Increased Elasticity: Slight skin hydration boost, mild swelling in reproductive tissue due to estrogen spikes.
Pigmentation Shift: Some species may exhibit darker or flushed hues in specific areas (face, genitals).
Detectability: Becomes noticeable near Minimum Mating : Neuromuscular Priming phase, when vascular responses heighten.
Genital Softening or Swelling
Localized expansion: Vaginal, cervical, and labial swelling occurs due to increased blood flow and tissue elasticity.
Detectability: Most prominent in Brief Contact – Early Tactile Reinforcement, aligning with early neuromuscular engagement.
Heightened Sensitivity & Arousal Response
Increased tactile responsiveness: Enhanced clitoral blood flow, sharper nerve signal transmission in erogenous zones.
Detectability: Aligns with Short Contact– Consistent Reflex Activation, where sensory feedback loops engage fully.
Abnormal Reactions During Intercourse
Involuntary muscle contractions: Pelvic region spasms may intensify during peak fertility, potential discomfort or heightened pleasure.
Detectability: Becomes highly pronounced near Mid Contact – Stable Engagement Phase, correlating with fluid exchange mechanics.
 Pheromone Amplification
Heightened biochemical signaling: Increased sexual attraction cues, subtle scent differentiation based on peak receptivity.
Detectability: Peaks during High Contact – Peak Neuromuscular Response, reinforcing fertility synchronization within engagement.
Endometrial Receptivity Surge
Uterine lining optimization: Final biochemical restructuring of reproductive tract maximizing implantation probability.
Detectability: Becomes biologically active in Imminent Mating : Final Activation Before Full Exposure, the point where conception probability is highest.




Experts Explain Mouwzi Edging Game
Expert in Favor: Dr. Elaan Voska (Mouwzi Fertility & Behavioral Sciences) _"The Mouwzi practice of Edging is a deeply ingrained technique that fosters exceptional reproductive awareness and self-control. By training individuals to recognize physiological shifts mid-encounter, they develop an acute sensitivity to their own arousal levels, improving their ability to regulate engagement and prevent unintended conception.
Historical analysis indicates that among high-discipline practitioners, Edging success rates rival conventional birth control methods in environments where external contraceptive options are unreliable."
Skeptic: Dr. Anzir Daroc (AUCR Institute, Biochemical Reproductive Studies) _"While the premise of Edging is intriguing, it suffers from critical flaws. Physiological responses in arousal are often unpredictable, varying due to environmental stressors, hormone fluctuations, or even simple miscalculations in timing.
Unlike mechanical contraception, which provides definitive barriers, Edging relies entirely on reaction speed and decision-making under heightened sensory conditions—both highly unreliable factors. The margin of error is significant enough that it cannot be considered a dependable birth control method in practical applications."
Arousal Threshold
Expected Time Elapsed
Likelihood of Sperm Introduction (0-5 Scale)
Likelihood Pregnancy Has
 Occurred (0-5 Scale)
First Contact
0-1 min
0 (No sperm introduced)
0 (Pregnancy impossible)
Scant Contact
1-3 min
1 (Earliest sperm introduction: 2m 15s)
0
Minimum Mating
3-5 min
2
0
Brief Contact
5-7 min
5 (Guaranteed sperm introduction: 6m 10s)
1 (First possible pregnancy: 6m 40s)
Short Contact
7-10 min
5
2
Mid Contact
10-14 min
5
3
High Contact
14-18 min
5
4
Imminent Mating
18-22 min
5
5 (Pregnancy guaranteed by 20m 50s)
Full Exposure
22+ min
5
5

", "writing": "", "writing_bbcode_parsed": "", "pools_count": 0, "title": "A Brief Exploration of the Reproductive Habits: Human", "deleted": "f", "public": "t", "mimetype": "image/jpeg", "pagecount": "1", "rating_id": "1", "rating_name": "Mature", "ratings": [ { "content_tag_id": "2", "name": "Nudity", "description": "Nonsexual nudity exposing breasts or genitals (must not show arousal)", "rating_id": "1" } ], "submission_type_id": "1", "type_name": "Picture/Pinup", "guest_block": "t", "friends_only": "f", "comments_count": "0", "views": "40" }