{ "submission_id": "3707750", "keywords": [ { "keyword_id": "554", "keyword_name": "alien", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "24559" }, { "keyword_id": "31427", "keyword_name": "biology", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "83" }, { "keyword_id": "1723", "keyword_name": "evolution", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "726" }, { "keyword_id": "123", "keyword_name": "female", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "1117710" }, { "keyword_id": "12223", "keyword_name": "health", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "103" }, { "keyword_id": "348938", "keyword_name": "speculative biology", "contributed": "f", "submissions_count": "65" } ], "hidden": "f", "scraps": "f", "favorite": "f", "favorites_count": "0", "create_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:19:01.408236+00", "create_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:19 CEST", "last_file_update_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:15:54.399373+00", "last_file_update_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:15 CEST", "username": "dfeyder", "user_id": "200255", "user_icon_file_name": "278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "user_icon_url_large": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/usericons/large/278/278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "user_icon_url_medium": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/usericons/medium/278/278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "user_icon_url_small": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/usericons/small/278/278267_dfeyder_pux_tatsu_ref-sfw.png", "file_name": "5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal_noncustom.jpg", "thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal_noncustom.jpg", "thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "120", "thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "thumb_large_noncustom_x": "200", "thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "300", "thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300", "files": [ { "file_id": "5719064", "file_name": "5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "mimetype": "image/jpeg", "submission_id": "3707750", "user_id": "200255", "submission_file_order": "0", "full_size_x": "1600", "full_size_y": "1600", "screen_size_x": "920", "screen_size_y": "920", "preview_size_x": "300", "preview_size_y": "300", "initial_file_md5": "1366ea25f165ea1903be30a5eb654fbb", "full_file_md5": "6c771e4d295b038edfe3be65de97f01d", "large_file_md5": "485b786bbe14c4302980c79aa58719f8", "small_file_md5": "38064ea8fbd21ecf6c5d1d97d711fcc0", "thumbnail_md5": "cdd2df483792f040105afd87a95372b5", "deleted": "f", "create_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:15:30.174135+00", "create_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:15 CEST", "thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal.jpg", "thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal_noncustom.jpg", "thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719064_dfeyder_haru_exsternal_noncustom.jpg", "thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "120", "thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "thumb_large_noncustom_x": "200", "thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "300", "thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300" }, { "file_id": "5719065", "file_name": "5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "mimetype": "image/jpeg", "submission_id": "3707750", "user_id": "200255", "submission_file_order": "1", "full_size_x": "1600", "full_size_y": "1600", "screen_size_x": "920", "screen_size_y": "920", "preview_size_x": "300", "preview_size_y": "300", "initial_file_md5": "e702ba95e80cc98a04f62d32310d16f2", "full_file_md5": "9af34e88ec846977d9b94e7e4218bbfd", "large_file_md5": "45867158408253b174d298299a8d26d7", "small_file_md5": "cf87fca02b1baedca31fa9be6a604b7b", "thumbnail_md5": "c28bf5fcae2c82e23d9e9eaa6cc3c7fe", "deleted": "f", "create_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:15:54.399373+00", "create_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:15 CEST", "thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal_noncustom.jpg", "thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal_noncustom.jpg", "thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "120", "thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "thumb_large_noncustom_x": "200", "thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "300", "thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300" }, { "file_id": "5719063", "file_name": "5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt.jpg", "file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt.jpg", "file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt.jpg", "file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt.jpg", "mimetype": "image/jpeg", "submission_id": "3707750", "user_id": "200255", "submission_file_order": "2", "full_size_x": "1137", "full_size_y": "1393", "screen_size_x": "920", "screen_size_y": "1127", "preview_size_x": "245", "preview_size_y": "300", "initial_file_md5": "360eac1517dfaa2dbbcd02e340da8360", "full_file_md5": "9e090834aea63f7ccdc23dc01ed317ab", "large_file_md5": "4de94d69110736043d9b969cad07915c", "small_file_md5": "63460d01a41a949c22d8f005217d7aad", "thumbnail_md5": "44f5f6242415dfbc66be83b62d196809", "deleted": "f", "create_datetime": "2025-09-15 23:15:08.870887+00", "create_datetime_usertime": "16 Sep 2025 01:15 CEST", "thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt.jpg", "thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt_noncustom.jpg", "thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719063_dfeyder_haru_alt_noncustom.jpg", "thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "98", "thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "thumb_large_noncustom_x": "163", "thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "245", "thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300" } ], "pools": [], "description": "\n\nDescription: Overall Physiology:\n\nPrimarily human-like, though female Haru display distinctive ocular pigmentation, differentiating them visually. Abnormal hair and eye colorations include–frosted blue, red and black stripes, violet. \n\nEpidermis becomes subtly porous during mating events, activating fluid absorption mechanisms.\n\nThe presence of Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) enzyme, secreted via a bladder-adjacent organ, plays a role in genetic encoding and gamete modification.\n\nReproductive Maturation Timeline: \nAdolescent Engagement Protocol (Reproductive Onset):\n 8-10 years \nPeak Fertility Phase (Mature Imprinting Protocol Activation):\n14-28 years \n\nNote: Behavioral observations indicate that female Haru exhibit a progressive shift between reproductive protocols, transitioning from Adolescent Engagement to Mature Imprinting between 17-19 years, depending on long-term mate viability establishment.\n\nGestation Parameters:\nStandard Gestational Period: 250-260 days \nObserved Gestational Regulation Mechanisms:\n\nShortened Gestation (205-230 days): Female Haru can voluntarily modulate gestation duration, reducing postpartum recovery to 15-20 days.\n\nExtended Gestation (265-330 days): Prolonged gestation induces physiological strain, resulting in recovery periods between 50-90 days.\n\nPostpartum Recovery: \nStandard Recovery: 28-40 days \nRegulated Recovery Mechanisms Based on Gestational Duration:\n\nEarly-Termination Recovery: 15-20 days if gestation ended before 230 days.\n\nExtended-Term Recovery: 50-90 days if gestation surpassed 265 days, resulting in heightened physiological wear.\n\nMating Event Dynamics:\nEvent Duration Varies Based on Reproductive Protocol: \nAdolescent Engagement Protocol (≤19 years or non-imprinted mate):\nStandard mating duration: 10-25 minutes\nExtended mating occurs only when imprint establishment is actively pursued, increasing event length to 30-40 minutes.\nMature Imprinting Protocol (≥20 years, imprinting behavior reinforced):\nImprint initiation becomes obligatory, regardless of previous imprint history.\nEngagement duration expands 45-90 minutes post-climax, with persistent Full Genital Contact (FGC) maintained until physical fatigue or environmental disruption limits continuation.\n\nGamete Interaction & Reproductive Efficiency:\nSperm-Ovum Interaction Timelines Based on Protocol Activation:\nAdolescent Engagement Protocol:\nGamete activation occurs 10-20 minutes post-mating under standard adolescent exposure conditions. \nMature Imprinting Protocol:\nExtended sperm viability window reaches 6-72 hours post-mating if LCL integration and imprinting synchronization occur.\n\nConception Success Rates by Engagement Type:\n Adolescent Phase (Non-Imprinting Events):\n <15% probability \nAdolescent Phase (Imprint Coding Attempts):\n 20-30% probability \nAdulthood (Unimprinted Partner): 50-55% probability \nAdulthood (Imprinted Partner): >90% probability\n\nEvent-Level Conception Probability: \nAdolescent Event-Level Mating:\nUnimprinted: 85-95% probability\nImprinted: >99% probability\n\nAdulthood Event-Level Mating:\nUnimprinted: 75-90% probability\nImprinted: >98% probability\n\nLitter Parameters & Ovulatory Cycles:\nOffspring Per Successful Mating Event: 1-2 expected \nTwin Formation Probability: 50% chance of identical twin formation post-fertilization. \n\nMultiple Egg Ovulation: 2% chance of multi-ovum presence during reproductive cycling.\nHeat Cycle Duration:\nStandard heat cycle: 25 days (compared to human 28-day cycle). \nSperm Storage Capability: Produces nectar-like fluid during mating, capable of sustaining sperm viability for up to 3 days pre-ovulation.\n\n\nEvolutionary Pressures & Theoretical Frameworks:\nArtificial Genetic Manipulation Hypothesis: Suggests that Haru were engineered rather than naturally evolved, serving as prototypes for Modular/Adaptable Cloning Unit viability experiments. \n\nStrict Mate Selection Strategies Reinforced by Internal Gestation: Gestational mechanisms limit early-development mortality, strengthening female-controlled reproductive selection behaviors.\n\nNote: LCL Gamete Coding and Ovulation take place as two distinct events. Impregnations is possible without LCL Gamete Coding. Mating that takes place before gamete coding is complete results in offspring having 100% haru DNA being a perfect clone of the haru. After gamete coding is complete, offspring is 99% of the coded individual–with the remaining percent being left open to allow for male or female variations and minor unique genetic expressions. \n\nEven with a coded gamete a haru female cannot self inseminate. After coding she still must allow a complete mating to confirm fertilization of coded egg cell. It is suspected by some but not confirmed that this final mating safeguard triggers the production of HGH signaling that it is safe for pregnancy to begin. \nLatchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) Concentration Mechanics in Haru\nLCL is a non-reproductive enzyme present in both male and female Haru, responsible for genetic encoding during imprinting. It activates through sweat glands, accumulating genetic material before coded eggs are generated.\n\nLCL Production & Saturation Rates\nBaseline Activation\n\nBegins at 8-10 years for adolescent engagement.\n\nReaches full imprint compatibility by 17-19 years, reinforcing gamete modification efficiency.\n\nAbsorption Efficiency by Body Region\n\nGenital Region : Peak LCL retention (90-100%); primary absorption site for imprint coding.\nPerineum & Lower Abdomen : High (80-95%); secondary retention area, ensuring imprint reinforcement.\nInner Thighs : Moderate (65-80%); supplementary fluid absorption supporting imprint stabilization.\nChest & Shoulders : Low (30-50%); minimal imprint coding effect, minor hormone interaction.\nUpper Arms & Back : Weak (15-40%); secondary exposure sites with minimal genetic integration.\nFace & Scalp : Negligible (5-20%); insufficient retention for imprint establishment.\n\nLCL Accumulation Over Time\n\nAbsorption Mechanics: LCL absorption begins immediately upon skin contact, with varying rates depending on the body zone.\nAccumulation Process: Each zone's absorption compounds over time, with total accumulation measured across a 90-day window.\nCoded Gamete Production: Gamete coding begins whenever a threshold is reached, and Haru is aware of each new imprint initiation.\nRetention Rates by Body Region: The face has the slowest absorption (1% per hour), while genital contact leads to the fastest rate (10% per hour).\nDaily Integration: Absorption rates across all zones are tallied at the end of each day, determining cumulative genetic intake.\nClarified Absorption System:\nBody Zone\nAbsorption Rate (% per hour)\nFace\n1%\nUpper Arms & Back\n2-3%\nChest & Shoulders\n4-5%\nInner Thighs\n6%\nPerineum & Lower Abdomen\n8%\nGenital Region\n10%\n\n\nAfter 90 days Coding decays gradually if no further contact with a target is continued–1-5% coding loss per day.\n\nEnvironmental & Hormonal Factors\n\nStress hormone fluctuations may alter LCL retention rates, delaying imprint completion.\n\nHeat cycle alignment increases fluid activation efficiency, reducing imprint coding time.\nMultiple partner exposure risks genetic imprint destabilization, potentially leading to misallocated coding.\n\nAbsorption Rate vs. Absorption Efficiency in LCL Integration\nIn the context of Haru physiology, absorption rate and absorption efficiency play distinct roles in the imprinting process. Absorption rate refers to the speed at which LCL is taken in through skin contact, measured as a percentage per hour based on body region. This determines how quickly genetic material is introduced into the system. Absorption efficiency, on the other hand, defines how much of the absorbed LCL remains viable for coding after integration. While some areas of the body retain nearly all absorbed material, others allow for significant dissipation or loss.\nFor instance, the genital region, responsible for primary imprint coding, exhibits both high absorption rate (10% per hour) and near-perfect efficiency (90-100%), ensuring minimal waste. In contrast, the face absorbs LCL at only 1% per hour with low efficiency (5-20%), meaning most absorbed material either fails to integrate or requires reinforcement through continued contact. This distinction highlights how imprinting is not just about exposure but about retention—reinforcing why instinctual behaviors around touch, protection, and imprint stabilization remain central to a Haru’s reproductive biology.\nUnique Sexual Dimorphism Adaptations:\nMale-Specific Adaptations:\nNever initiate mating events, requiring prolonged genital contact before arousal onset.\n\nEnhanced hormonal detection grants fertility & health assessment capabilities superior to human males.\n\nIncapable of conceiving offspring with female Haru due to RNA sequencing failure in zygotic formation (genetic reproduction duplication error).\nFemale-Specific Adaptations:\n\nExtended fertility window : Heat cycle lasts 25 days (vs. human 28-day cycle).\n\nLCL enzyme activation enables selective gamete modification, ensuring exclusive genetic retention of preferred mate DNA when adequate absorption occurs.\n\nEarly adolescent reproductive behaviors emphasize multi-partner engagement, reducing imprint dependency until full maturation occurs.\n\nUpon reaching full reproductive maturity, females engage in monogamous imprinting behaviors, refusing intimate contact unless imprint mate is present.\n\nAnatomy Male: \nShape: peach or brown, sometimes pink. Nozzle shape, has a fourskin that protects tip. \nSize: 4”-9”\nStructure: a secondary gland is attached to the testicals that produces and captures LCL in order to activate mating. \nAnatomy Female:\nShape: \nThe labia consist of two sets of folds, situated vertically along the pelvic floor. These folds act as the outer boundary for the vaginal opening and serve both protective and sensory functions.\n\nThe labia majora (outer folds) are moderately firm to the touch, forming a gentle ridge that runs along the pubic area down to the base of the perineum. They remain slightly curved inward, closing the vaginal entrance when the body is in a neutral state.\nThe labia minora (inner folds) are slimmer and softer, positioned within the labia majora and creating a second set of ridges that frame the vaginal opening. Their texture is more pliable, allowing them to expand or contract in response to physical stimulation and environmental factors.\n\nIn Haru females, the inner folds exhibit a subtle darker pigmentation along their creases, with the outer surfaces remaining lighter. This tonal shift becomes more pronounced when hormonal activity increases.\n\nThe entire structure is oriented vertically, following the alignment of the pelvic musculature. Unlike some species where the folds are more rounded or angled outward, Haru labia maintain a sleek, streamlined arrangement, emphasizing fluid efficiency and imprint retention functions during reproductive events.\n\nSparse traces of blue-tinted hair outline the labial edges, forming a thin border along the outer ridges. This faint color variation integrates seamlessly with their epidermal tone, reinforcing their species' distinct pigmentation traits.\n\nThe porous epidermal adaptation activates only during reproductive engagement, enabling efficient fluid absorption and imprint encoding when genetic material is exchanged. In a non-active state, the outer surface remains smooth and well-insulated, minimizing external exposure.\n\nDepth:\nMeasured vaginal depth ranges between 3.5-4.5 inches, comparable to human female anatomy but moderately flexible due to adaptive fluid retention properties.\nCervical structure exhibits responsive elasticity, assisting in sperm absorption efficiency during imprint activation.\n\nStructure:\nLabia Majora: Slightly firmer composition, designed for temporary imprint retention when exposed to genetically encoded fluids.\n\nLabia Minora: Functions as a fluid interface, absorbing external genetic markers (LCL activation site).\n\nVestibular Glands: Enhanced scent detection mechanisms, capable of identifying imprint-matched mates via subtle chemical signals.\n\nVaginal Canal: Exhibits adaptive micro-texturing, assisting imprint efficiency and gamete modification stabilization (a trait absent in humans).\n\nCervical Adaptation: Semi-permeable enzymatic filtration layer, ensuring imprint-exclusive fertilization compatibility when gametes interact.\n\nAdditional Considerations\nSperm Storage Mechanism: Capable of preserving viable sperm via a nectar-like secretion for up to 3 days pre-ovulation.\n\nHormonal Response to Imprinted Mating: If imprinting occurs, post-mating fluid retention increases, enhancing genetic absorption rates.\n\nReproductive Hierarchy Influence: Since imprinting determines mate exclusivity, vaginal structure plays a direct role in mate selection reinforcement through physiological adaptation.\n\nHistorical Documentation – LIFECORE R&D Memo Discovery:\nArchival records uncovered at AUCR reference a classified document indicating Haru were synthetically manufactured under LIFECORE’s experimental cloning project. \n225 Haru were allegedly created using alien resources, but deemed ethically nonviable, resulting in project defunding & de-manufacturing efforts. \nHaru males instinctively refuse mating with Haru females due to genetic reproduction failures, preventing viable zygote formation via RNA sequence breakdown. \nMale Haru exhibit unique pheromone-sensitive glands, granting them universal ovulation detection capabilities across diverse species.\n\nFinal Note on Haru Reproduction:\nImprinting and impregnation are distinct processes, operating under independent hormonal triggers. \nHaru reproductive mechanics appear structurally layered, as though a baseline human reproductive system was installed first, followed by secondary Haru-specific adaptations. Imprinting does not guarantee conception, but imprint-deficient mating events severely impact reproductive viability.\n\nInterviews:\nLegal quandary: What happens if a Coded Haru Egg is Lost or Stolen? \nCore Legal Issues in Shinji vs. Mary, Wendefered, Sara, and Candra Sanderson\nBen Interviews Dixson Hill at the Law Office of Will, Cheat and Howel:\n\nBen: \"Alright, let’s start with the basics—what happens if a coded egg is lost or stolen?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (leans back, adjusting his tie) \"That depends on how it happens. Losing a coded egg is one thing—accidental dispersal, implantation failure, or biological misplacement. But theft? That’s where things get legally messy.\"\n\nBen: \"Legally messy how?\"\n\nDixson Hill: \"First, we have to establish intent. Genetic misappropriation laws—like MN 13.386—focus on whether there was a deliberate act of acquisition. Was the egg stolen with the intention of implantation, or did it end up with an unintended recipient by accident? Courts don’t always recognize passive absorption as theft.\"\n\nBen: \"That’s what happened in Shinji’s case, right?\"\n\nDixson Hill: \"Exactly. Shinji argued misappropriation because his coded gamete was intended for Wendefered, but Sara absorbed a portion during the Mating Event. The adjudicator ruled that, while unintended, Shinji should have recognized the risk of multi-recipient absorption. It wasn’t a premeditated theft—just a biological outcome of the environment.\"\n\nBen: \"But what about actual theft? Say, someone physically extracts a coded egg from a male Haru—what then?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (nods, pulling out a legal document) \"Now that’s a different story. Unlike females—who imprint multiple eggs and select one—male Haru manufacture coded gametes in bulk and release them in controlled increments. If someone steals an active-coded cluster before implantation, that’s a direct violation of genetic ownership.\"\n\nBen: \"So theft would be prosecuted under reproductive autonomy laws?\"\n\nDixson Hill: \"In theory, yes. But here’s the problem—there’s limited precedent. There’s no documented case of a female Haru losing a coded egg to theft, only males. And in those cases, prosecution depends on proving unauthorized implantation occurred with intent.\"\n\nBen: \"Which is hard, because conception happens passively?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (scoffs, crossing his arms) \"Exactly. A stolen gamete doesn’t guarantee pregnancy—it only increases the possibility of misuse. Courts hesitate to convict without direct evidence that the thief actively sought conception rather than just acquiring genetic material.\"\n\nBen: \"So is there a legal gap here?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (sighs, flipping through case records) \"Huge one. MN 13.386 covers misappropriation, but doesn’t account for the error margin inherent in male Haru implantation mechanics. The biological process itself makes theft difficult to track or litigate—unless genetic sequencing confirms unauthorized reproductive intent.\"\n\nBen: (leans forward) \"And has that ever happened?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (pauses) \"There are cases where stolen coded eggs were found in unintended hosts, but no ruling has successfully confirmed premeditated misuse. The science isn't concrete enough.\"\n\nBen: \"So this could change if implantation tracking technology improves?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (grins) \"That’s what I expect. Once we can biochemically track gamete implantation and confirm genetic intent, misappropriation cases will hold stronger in court. But until then? We’re stuck in legal ambiguity.\"\n\nBen: Did you say ‘accidental absorption’ just a few moments ago?\nDixson Hill shifts slightly in his chair, tapping a pen against the table before answering.\nDixson Hill: \"Yeah. Accidental absorption. It’s rare, but it happens. The issue with male Haru-coded eggs is that they’re not individually selected like female Haru eggs—they’re released in bulk, then activated when the recipient’s body signals pregnancy readiness.\"\nHe gestures toward a legal document on his desk.\nDixson Hill: \"Now, say you’re in a Mating Event. Shinji’s case is a good example. He intended to implant Wendefered—but coded eggs aren’t microscopic heat-seeking missiles; they don’t ‘lock on’ instantly. They disperse, waiting for activation. If another participant—Sara, in this case—had a biochemical environment conducive to activation, she could unintentionally absorb a portion of what was spent.\"\nBen: \"So the male doesn’t place the egg directly. The environment determines which gametes activate?\"\nDixson Hill: (snaps his fingers) \"Exactly. A female Haru has a precise coding system—her body selects a pre-imprinted egg, ensures genetic compatibility, and fertilizes it through LCL and HGH integration. A male Haru, though? He’s working with pure volume. Millions of coded eggs, all waiting for the recipient’s biochemical response to trigger activation. If the environment shifts—if another participant has hormone patterns similar to the intended host—there’s a chance they’ll absorb the gametes instead.\"\nBen: \"But couldn’t Shinji have avoided this? If he knew Wendefered was his intended recipient, shouldn’t he have been able to control where the gametes landed?\"\nDixson Hill: (chuckles dryly) \"You’d think so. But remember—the act of spending coded gametes is a reflexive biological function. A male Haru doesn’t have a manual override. Once the process starts, the best he can do is limit environmental exposure, but in a Mating Event—where hormone levels are heightened across multiple participants—precision control is next to impossible.\"\nBen: \"So, in that case, is Sara responsible for misappropriation? Or was this just a biological inevitability?\"\nDixson sighs, rubbing his temple.\nDixson Hill: \"That was the core question in Shinji’s case. The adjudicator ruled a 70-30 split in favor of Sara—meaning Shinji carried some responsibility because he knowingly participated in an environment where multi-recipient absorption was possible. But Sara wasn’t entirely blameless—she anticipated the risk, and courts acknowledged that her conception wasn’t fully accidental.\"\nBen: \"So what stops this from happening more often?\"\nDixson gestures vaguely.\nDixson Hill: \"Nothing—except social customs. Haru males favor single-recipient imprinting precisely to avoid situations like Shinji’s. But in multi-partner encounters, the biological error margin widens, and legal cases like this expose the flaws in genetic governance. Until courts recognize stricter guidelines for gamete spending, cases like Shinji’s will keep happening.\"\nBen: \"So, in short—coded egg theft is rare, but misplacement is biologically inevitable?\"\nDixson Hill: (grinning slightly) \"You got it, kid.\"\nBen: \"Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) enzyme, this is present in both male and female haru, but it is not a sexual fluid, it activates through the sweat glands, it is used during the imprinting process before the generation of the coded eggs. The function it serves is in gathering DNA and RNA to allow coding to begin once the eggs are coded. I don't see any evidence that it plays any further role in conception.\"\nDixson Hill nods, flipping through his case notes before responding.\n\nDixson Hill: \"That’s a fair point, and it's a critical distinction. LCL isn't a reproductive fluid—it’s an imprinting facilitator. It activates through the sweat glands during the genetic encoding process, gathering DNA and RNA before coded eggs are manufactured. Once the eggs are imprinted, LCL no longer plays a role in conception.\"\n\nHe leans forward, tapping his fingers on the desk.\n\nDixson Hill: \"That actually reinforces why male Haru-coded egg theft cases are different from female reproductive disputes. Since male implantation operates on mass gamete dispersal, the moment an egg is coded, it’s primed for implantation. LCL is irrelevant after that stage—it doesn’t regulate transfer, fertilization, or gestation. If someone steals a coded gamete, there’s no biochemical safeguard preventing unintended integration.\"\n\nBen: (scribbling furiously) \"So when Shinji lost control of his coded gamete, LCL wasn’t a factor—it was purely about the mechanics of absorption?\"\n\nDixson Hill: (grinning slightly) \"Exactly. That means proving misappropriation is even harder. If LCL were involved post-coding, courts could use biochemical tracking to verify the intended recipient. But since coded eggs function independently, legal responsibility hinges on proving intentional misuse rather than biological inevitability. But if you want to talk more about that, we need a geneticist. I am a lawyer. \"\n", "description_bbcode_parsed": "

Description: Overall Physiology:

Primarily human-like, though female Haru display distinctive ocular pigmentation, differentiating them visually. Abnormal hair and eye colorations include–frosted blue, red and black stripes, violet.

Epidermis becomes subtly porous during mating events, activating fluid absorption mechanisms.

The presence of Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) enzyme, secreted via a bladder-adjacent organ, plays a role in genetic encoding and gamete modification.

Reproductive Maturation Timeline:
Adolescent Engagement Protocol (Reproductive Onset):
 8-10 years
Peak Fertility Phase (Mature Imprinting Protocol Activation):
14-28 years

Note: Behavioral observations indicate that female Haru exhibit a progressive shift between reproductive protocols, transitioning from Adolescent Engagement to Mature Imprinting between 17-19 years, depending on long-term mate viability establishment.

Gestation Parameters:
Standard Gestational Period: 250-260 days
Observed Gestational Regulation Mechanisms:

Shortened Gestation (205-230 days): Female Haru can voluntarily modulate gestation duration, reducing postpartum recovery to 15-20 days.

Extended Gestation (265-330 days): Prolonged gestation induces physiological strain, resulting in recovery periods between 50-90 days.

Postpartum Recovery:
Standard Recovery: 28-40 days
Regulated Recovery Mechanisms Based on Gestational Duration:

Early-Termination Recovery: 15-20 days if gestation ended before 230 days.

Extended-Term Recovery: 50-90 days if gestation surpassed 265 days, resulting in heightened physiological wear.

Mating Event Dynamics:
Event Duration Varies Based on Reproductive Protocol:
Adolescent Engagement Protocol (≤19 years or non-imprinted mate):
Standard mating duration: 10-25 minutes
Extended mating occurs only when imprint establishment is actively pursued, increasing event length to 30-40 minutes.
Mature Imprinting Protocol (≥20 years, imprinting behavior reinforced):
Imprint initiation becomes obligatory, regardless of previous imprint history.
Engagement duration expands 45-90 minutes post-climax, with persistent Full Genital Contact (FGC) maintained until physical fatigue or environmental disruption limits continuation.

Gamete Interaction & Reproductive Efficiency:
Sperm-Ovum Interaction Timelines Based on Protocol Activation:
Adolescent Engagement Protocol:
Gamete activation occurs 10-20 minutes post-mating under standard adolescent exposure conditions.  
Mature Imprinting Protocol:
Extended sperm viability window reaches 6-72 hours post-mating if LCL integration and imprinting synchronization occur.

Conception Success Rates by Engagement Type:
 Adolescent Phase (Non-Imprinting Events):
 <15% probability
Adolescent Phase (Imprint Coding Attempts):
 20-30% probability
Adulthood (Unimprinted Partner): 50-55% probability
Adulthood (Imprinted Partner): >90% probability

Event-Level Conception Probability:  
Adolescent Event-Level Mating:
Unimprinted: 85-95% probability
Imprinted: >99% probability

Adulthood Event-Level Mating:
Unimprinted: 75-90% probability
Imprinted: >98% probability

Litter Parameters & Ovulatory Cycles:
Offspring Per Successful Mating Event: 1-2 expected
Twin Formation Probability: 50% chance of identical twin formation post-fertilization.

Multiple Egg Ovulation: 2% chance of multi-ovum presence during reproductive cycling.
Heat Cycle Duration:
Standard heat cycle: 25 days (compared to human 28-day cycle).
Sperm Storage Capability: Produces nectar-like fluid during mating, capable of sustaining sperm viability for up to 3 days pre-ovulation.


Evolutionary Pressures & Theoretical Frameworks:
Artificial Genetic Manipulation Hypothesis: Suggests that Haru were engineered rather than naturally evolved, serving as prototypes for Modular/Adaptable Cloning Unit viability experiments.

Strict Mate Selection Strategies Reinforced by Internal Gestation: Gestational mechanisms limit early-development mortality, strengthening female-controlled reproductive selection behaviors.

Note: LCL Gamete Coding and Ovulation take place as two distinct events. Impregnations is possible without LCL Gamete Coding. Mating that takes place before gamete coding is complete results in offspring having 100% haru DNA being a perfect clone of the haru. After gamete coding is complete, offspring is 99% of the coded individual–with the remaining percent being left open to allow for male or female variations and minor unique genetic expressions.  

Even with a coded gamete a haru female cannot self inseminate. After coding she still must allow a complete mating to confirm fertilization of coded egg cell. It is suspected by some but not confirmed that this final mating safeguard triggers the production of HGH signaling that it is safe for pregnancy to begin.
Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) Concentration Mechanics in Haru
LCL is a non-reproductive enzyme present in both male and female Haru, responsible for genetic encoding during imprinting. It activates through sweat glands, accumulating genetic material before coded eggs are generated.

LCL Production & Saturation Rates
Baseline Activation

Begins at 8-10 years for adolescent engagement.

Reaches full imprint compatibility by 17-19 years, reinforcing gamete modification efficiency.

Absorption Efficiency by Body Region

Genital Region : Peak LCL retention (90-100%); primary absorption site for imprint coding.
Perineum & Lower Abdomen : High (80-95%); secondary retention area, ensuring imprint reinforcement.
Inner Thighs : Moderate (65-80%); supplementary fluid absorption supporting imprint stabilization.
Chest & Shoulders : Low (30-50%); minimal imprint coding effect, minor hormone interaction.
Upper Arms & Back : Weak (15-40%); secondary exposure sites with minimal genetic integration.
Face & Scalp : Negligible (5-20%); insufficient retention for imprint establishment.

LCL Accumulation Over Time

Absorption Mechanics: LCL absorption begins immediately upon skin contact, with varying rates depending on the body zone.
Accumulation Process: Each zone's absorption compounds over time, with total accumulation measured across a 90-day window.
Coded Gamete Production: Gamete coding begins whenever a threshold is reached, and Haru is aware of each new imprint initiation.
Retention Rates by Body Region: The face has the slowest absorption (1% per hour), while genital contact leads to the fastest rate (10% per hour).
Daily Integration: Absorption rates across all zones are tallied at the end of each day, determining cumulative genetic intake.
Clarified Absorption System:
Body Zone
Absorption Rate (% per hour)
Face
1%
Upper Arms & Back
2-3%
Chest & Shoulders
4-5%
Inner Thighs
6%
Perineum & Lower Abdomen
8%
Genital Region
10%


After 90 days Coding decays gradually if no further contact with a target is continued–1-5% coding loss per day.

Environmental & Hormonal Factors

Stress hormone fluctuations may alter LCL retention rates, delaying imprint completion.

Heat cycle alignment increases fluid activation efficiency, reducing imprint coding time.
Multiple partner exposure risks genetic imprint destabilization, potentially leading to misallocated coding.

Absorption Rate vs. Absorption Efficiency in LCL Integration
In the context of Haru physiology, absorption rate and absorption efficiency play distinct roles in the imprinting process. Absorption rate refers to the speed at which LCL is taken in through skin contact, measured as a percentage per hour based on body region. This determines how quickly genetic material is introduced into the system. Absorption efficiency, on the other hand, defines how much of the absorbed LCL remains viable for coding after integration. While some areas of the body retain nearly all absorbed material, others allow for significant dissipation or loss.
For instance, the genital region, responsible for primary imprint coding, exhibits both high absorption rate (10% per hour) and near-perfect efficiency (90-100%), ensuring minimal waste. In contrast, the face absorbs LCL at only 1% per hour with low efficiency (5-20%), meaning most absorbed material either fails to integrate or requires reinforcement through continued contact. This distinction highlights how imprinting is not just about exposure but about retention—reinforcing why instinctual behaviors around touch, protection, and imprint stabilization remain central to a Haru’s reproductive biology.
Unique Sexual Dimorphism Adaptations:
Male-Specific Adaptations:
Never initiate mating events, requiring prolonged genital contact before arousal onset.

Enhanced hormonal detection grants fertility & health assessment capabilities superior to human males.

Incapable of conceiving offspring with female Haru due to RNA sequencing failure in zygotic formation (genetic reproduction duplication error).
Female-Specific Adaptations:

Extended fertility window : Heat cycle lasts 25 days (vs. human 28-day cycle).

LCL enzyme activation enables selective gamete modification, ensuring exclusive genetic retention of preferred mate DNA when adequate absorption occurs.

Early adolescent reproductive behaviors emphasize multi-partner engagement, reducing imprint dependency until full maturation occurs.

Upon reaching full reproductive maturity, females engage in monogamous imprinting behaviors, refusing intimate contact unless imprint mate is present.

Anatomy Male:
Shape: peach or brown, sometimes pink. Nozzle shape, has a fourskin that protects tip.  
Size: 4”-9”
Structure: a secondary gland is attached to the testicals that produces and captures LCL in order to activate mating.  
Anatomy Female:
Shape:
The labia consist of two sets of folds, situated vertically along the pelvic floor. These folds act as the outer boundary for the vaginal opening and serve both protective and sensory functions.

The labia majora (outer folds) are moderately firm to the touch, forming a gentle ridge that runs along the pubic area down to the base of the perineum. They remain slightly curved inward, closing the vaginal entrance when the body is in a neutral state.
The labia minora (inner folds) are slimmer and softer, positioned within the labia majora and creating a second set of ridges that frame the vaginal opening. Their texture is more pliable, allowing them to expand or contract in response to physical stimulation and environmental factors.

In Haru females, the inner folds exhibit a subtle darker pigmentation along their creases, with the outer surfaces remaining lighter. This tonal shift becomes more pronounced when hormonal activity increases.

The entire structure is oriented vertically, following the alignment of the pelvic musculature. Unlike some species where the folds are more rounded or angled outward, Haru labia maintain a sleek, streamlined arrangement, emphasizing fluid efficiency and imprint retention functions during reproductive events.

Sparse traces of blue-tinted hair outline the labial edges, forming a thin border along the outer ridges. This faint color variation integrates seamlessly with their epidermal tone, reinforcing their species' distinct pigmentation traits.

The porous epidermal adaptation activates only during reproductive engagement, enabling efficient fluid absorption and imprint encoding when genetic material is exchanged. In a non-active state, the outer surface remains smooth and well-insulated, minimizing external exposure.

Depth:
Measured vaginal depth ranges between 3.5-4.5 inches, comparable to human female anatomy but moderately flexible due to adaptive fluid retention properties.
Cervical structure exhibits responsive elasticity, assisting in sperm absorption efficiency during imprint activation.

Structure:
Labia Majora: Slightly firmer composition, designed for temporary imprint retention when exposed to genetically encoded fluids.

Labia Minora: Functions as a fluid interface, absorbing external genetic markers (LCL activation site).

Vestibular Glands: Enhanced scent detection mechanisms, capable of identifying imprint-matched mates via subtle chemical signals.

Vaginal Canal: Exhibits adaptive micro-texturing, assisting imprint efficiency and gamete modification stabilization (a trait absent in humans).

Cervical Adaptation: Semi-permeable enzymatic filtration layer, ensuring imprint-exclusive fertilization compatibility when gametes interact.

Additional Considerations
Sperm Storage Mechanism: Capable of preserving viable sperm via a nectar-like secretion for up to 3 days pre-ovulation.

Hormonal Response to Imprinted Mating: If imprinting occurs, post-mating fluid retention increases, enhancing genetic absorption rates.

Reproductive Hierarchy Influence: Since imprinting determines mate exclusivity, vaginal structure plays a direct role in mate selection reinforcement through physiological adaptation.

Historical Documentation – LIFECORE R&D Memo Discovery:
Archival records uncovered at AUCR reference a classified document indicating Haru were synthetically manufactured under LIFECORE’s experimental cloning project.
225 Haru were allegedly created using alien resources, but deemed ethically nonviable, resulting in project defunding & de-manufacturing efforts.
Haru males instinctively refuse mating with Haru females due to genetic reproduction failures, preventing viable zygote formation via RNA sequence breakdown.
Male Haru exhibit unique pheromone-sensitive glands, granting them universal ovulation detection capabilities across diverse species.

Final Note on Haru Reproduction:
Imprinting and impregnation are distinct processes, operating under independent hormonal triggers.
Haru reproductive mechanics appear structurally layered, as though a baseline human reproductive system was installed first, followed by secondary Haru-specific adaptations. Imprinting does not guarantee conception, but imprint-deficient mating events severely impact reproductive viability.

Interviews:
Legal quandary: What happens if a Coded Haru Egg is Lost or Stolen?
Core Legal Issues in Shinji vs. Mary, Wendefered, Sara, and Candra Sanderson
Ben Interviews Dixson Hill at the Law Office of Will, Cheat and Howel:

Ben: "Alright, let’s start with the basics—what happens if a coded egg is lost or stolen?"

Dixson Hill: (leans back, adjusting his tie) "That depends on how it happens. Losing a coded egg is one thing—accidental dispersal, implantation failure, or biological misplacement. But theft? That’s where things get legally messy."

Ben: "Legally messy how?"

Dixson Hill: "First, we have to establish intent. Genetic misappropriation laws—like MN 13.386—focus on whether there was a deliberate act of acquisition. Was the egg stolen with the intention of implantation, or did it end up with an unintended recipient by accident? Courts don’t always recognize passive absorption as theft."

Ben: "That’s what happened in Shinji’s case, right?"

Dixson Hill: "Exactly. Shinji argued misappropriation because his coded gamete was intended for Wendefered, but Sara absorbed a portion during the Mating Event. The adjudicator ruled that, while unintended, Shinji should have recognized the risk of multi-recipient absorption. It wasn’t a premeditated theft—just a biological outcome of the environment."

Ben: "But what about actual theft? Say, someone physically extracts a coded egg from a male Haru—what then?"

Dixson Hill: (nods, pulling out a legal document) "Now that’s a different story. Unlike females—who imprint multiple eggs and select one—male Haru manufacture coded gametes in bulk and release them in controlled increments. If someone steals an active-coded cluster before implantation, that’s a direct violation of genetic ownership."

Ben: "So theft would be prosecuted under reproductive autonomy laws?"

Dixson Hill: "In theory, yes. But here’s the problem—there’s limited precedent. There’s no documented case of a female Haru losing a coded egg to theft, only males. And in those cases, prosecution depends on proving unauthorized implantation occurred with intent."

Ben: "Which is hard, because conception happens passively?"

Dixson Hill: (scoffs, crossing his arms) "Exactly. A stolen gamete doesn’t guarantee pregnancy—it only increases the possibility of misuse. Courts hesitate to convict without direct evidence that the thief actively sought conception rather than just acquiring genetic material."

Ben: "So is there a legal gap here?"

Dixson Hill: (sighs, flipping through case records) "Huge one. MN 13.386 covers misappropriation, but doesn’t account for the error margin inherent in male Haru implantation mechanics. The biological process itself makes theft difficult to track or litigate—unless genetic sequencing confirms unauthorized reproductive intent."

Ben: (leans forward) "And has that ever happened?"

Dixson Hill: (pauses) "There are cases where stolen coded eggs were found in unintended hosts, but no ruling has successfully confirmed premeditated misuse. The science isn't concrete enough."

Ben: "So this could change if implantation tracking technology improves?"

Dixson Hill: (grins) "That’s what I expect. Once we can biochemically track gamete implantation and confirm genetic intent, misappropriation cases will hold stronger in court. But until then? We’re stuck in legal ambiguity."

Ben: Did you say ‘accidental absorption’ just a few moments ago?
Dixson Hill shifts slightly in his chair, tapping a pen against the table before answering.
Dixson Hill: "Yeah. Accidental absorption. It’s rare, but it happens. The issue with male Haru-coded eggs is that they’re not individually selected like female Haru eggs—they’re released in bulk, then activated when the recipient’s body signals pregnancy readiness."
He gestures toward a legal document on his desk.
Dixson Hill: "Now, say you’re in a Mating Event. Shinji’s case is a good example. He intended to implant Wendefered—but coded eggs aren’t microscopic heat-seeking missiles; they don’t ‘lock on’ instantly. They disperse, waiting for activation. If another participant—Sara, in this case—had a biochemical environment conducive to activation, she could unintentionally absorb a portion of what was spent."
Ben: "So the male doesn’t place the egg directly. The environment determines which gametes activate?"
Dixson Hill: (snaps his fingers) "Exactly. A female Haru has a precise coding system—her body selects a pre-imprinted egg, ensures genetic compatibility, and fertilizes it through LCL and HGH integration. A male Haru, though? He’s working with pure volume. Millions of coded eggs, all waiting for the recipient’s biochemical response to trigger activation. If the environment shifts—if another participant has hormone patterns similar to the intended host—there’s a chance they’ll absorb the gametes instead."
Ben: "But couldn’t Shinji have avoided this? If he knew Wendefered was his intended recipient, shouldn’t he have been able to control where the gametes landed?"
Dixson Hill: (chuckles dryly) "You’d think so. But remember—the act of spending coded gametes is a reflexive biological function. A male Haru doesn’t have a manual override. Once the process starts, the best he can do is limit environmental exposure, but in a Mating Event—where hormone levels are heightened across multiple participants—precision control is next to impossible."
Ben: "So, in that case, is Sara responsible for misappropriation? Or was this just a biological inevitability?"
Dixson sighs, rubbing his temple.
Dixson Hill: "That was the core question in Shinji’s case. The adjudicator ruled a 70-30 split in favor of Sara—meaning Shinji carried some responsibility because he knowingly participated in an environment where multi-recipient absorption was possible. But Sara wasn’t entirely blameless—she anticipated the risk, and courts acknowledged that her conception wasn’t fully accidental."
Ben: "So what stops this from happening more often?"
Dixson gestures vaguely.
Dixson Hill: "Nothing—except social customs. Haru males favor single-recipient imprinting precisely to avoid situations like Shinji’s. But in multi-partner encounters, the biological error margin widens, and legal cases like this expose the flaws in genetic governance. Until courts recognize stricter guidelines for gamete spending, cases like Shinji’s will keep happening."
Ben: "So, in short—coded egg theft is rare, but misplacement is biologically inevitable?"
Dixson Hill: (grinning slightly) "You got it, kid."
Ben: "Latchkey-Caltivatus Lecchus (LCL) enzyme, this is present in both male and female haru, but it is not a sexual fluid, it activates through the sweat glands, it is used during the imprinting process before the generation of the coded eggs. The function it serves is in gathering DNA and RNA to allow coding to begin once the eggs are coded. I don't see any evidence that it plays any further role in conception."
Dixson Hill nods, flipping through his case notes before responding.

Dixson Hill: "That’s a fair point, and it's a critical distinction. LCL isn't a reproductive fluid—it’s an imprinting facilitator. It activates through the sweat glands during the genetic encoding process, gathering DNA and RNA before coded eggs are manufactured. Once the eggs are imprinted, LCL no longer plays a role in conception."

He leans forward, tapping his fingers on the desk.

Dixson Hill: "That actually reinforces why male Haru-coded egg theft cases are different from female reproductive disputes. Since male implantation operates on mass gamete dispersal, the moment an egg is coded, it’s primed for implantation. LCL is irrelevant after that stage—it doesn’t regulate transfer, fertilization, or gestation. If someone steals a coded gamete, there’s no biochemical safeguard preventing unintended integration."

Ben: (scribbling furiously) "So when Shinji lost control of his coded gamete, LCL wasn’t a factor—it was purely about the mechanics of absorption?"

Dixson Hill: (grinning slightly) "Exactly. That means proving misappropriation is even harder. If LCL were involved post-coding, courts could use biochemical tracking to verify the intended recipient. But since coded eggs function independently, legal responsibility hinges on proving intentional misuse rather than biological inevitability. But if you want to talk more about that, we need a geneticist. I am a lawyer. "
", "writing": "", "writing_bbcode_parsed": "", "pools_count": 0, "title": "A Brief Exploration of the Reproductive Habits: Haru", "deleted": "f", "public": "t", "mimetype": "image/jpeg", "pagecount": "3", "rating_id": "1", "rating_name": "Mature", "ratings": [ { "content_tag_id": "2", "name": "Nudity", "description": "Nonsexual nudity exposing breasts or genitals (must not show arousal)", "rating_id": "1" } ], "submission_type_id": "1", "type_name": "Picture/Pinup", "guest_block": "t", "friends_only": "f", "comments_count": "0", "views": "28", "latest_file_name": "5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "latest_mimetype": "image/jpeg", "latest_file_url_full": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/full/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "latest_file_url_screen": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/screen/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "latest_file_url_preview": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "latest_thumbnail_url_huge_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/files/preview/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal.jpg", "latest_thumbnail_url_large_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/large/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal_noncustom.jpg", "latest_thumbnail_url_medium_noncustom": "https://nl1.ib.metapix.net/thumbnails/medium/5719/5719065_dfeyder_haru_internal_noncustom.jpg", "latest_thumb_medium_noncustom_x": "120", "latest_thumb_medium_noncustom_y": "120", "latest_thumb_large_noncustom_x": "200", "latest_thumb_large_noncustom_y": "200", "latest_thumb_huge_noncustom_x": "300", "latest_thumb_huge_noncustom_y": "300" }